<p>It's a direct result of how monetary policy is normally conducted. In normal-times monetary policy, the Fed will increase its target rate (the Fed Funds rate) by selling Treasuries to dealers, who will pay for them by withdrawing deposits they hold at banks. The cash that formed these deposits can therefore no longer be held as excess reserves at the Fed, which decreases the supply of funds in the Fed Funds market, increasing the price of borrowing funds (i.e., the Fed Funds rate). The reduction in bank reserves is actually the mechanism by which rates are increased; the sale of bonds is just a way of reducing reserves.</p>

<p>Here's <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2015/04/10/the-hutchins-center-explains-how-the-fed-will-raise-interest-rates/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a reference</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-07T18:28:11.087Z
Thanks for the answer. The US system, however, is unique in this sense. In other contexts, such as the UK, the central bank doesn't have a target as it can directly manipulate the policy rate. Would the mechanism still hold?
ts_highbury
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-07T18:54:39.323Z
I believe it would be a slightly different mechanism. All else equal, if the cost of gilt repo is higher, banks should be less likely to repo out their gilts to the BoE for cash, which would also result in lower reserves.
dismalscience
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-07T18:24:12.967Z
2017-03-07T18:24:12.967Z
dismalscience
<p>In discussions of the "credit channel" in the transmission of monetary policy, I've read that increasing the policy rate reduces bank reserves. Can someone explain how this happens?</p>

<monetary-policy><central-banking>
How monetary policy affects bank reserves
ts_highbury
# How monetary policy affects bank reserves

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-09-22)

In discussions of the "credit channel" in the transmission of monetary policy, I've read that increasing the policy rate reduces bank reserves. Can someone explain how this happens?

**Tags:** monetary-policy, central-banking


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-03-07. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

It's a direct result of how monetary policy is normally conducted. In normal-times monetary policy, the Fed will increase its target rate (the Fed Funds rate) by selling Treasuries to dealers, who will pay for them by withdrawing deposits they hold at banks. The cash that formed these deposits can therefore no longer be held as excess reserves at the Fed, which decreases the supply of funds in the Fed Funds market, increasing the price of borrowing funds (i.e., the Fed Funds rate). The reduction in bank reserves is actually the mechanism by which rates are increased; the sale of bonds is just a way of reducing reserves.

Here's [a reference](https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2015/04/10/the-hutchins-center-explains-how-the-fed-will-raise-interest-rates/).

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks for the answer. The US system, however, is unique in this sense. In other contexts, such as the UK, the central bank doesn't have a target as it can directly manipulate the policy rate. Would the mechanism still hold?  
> **username_1**: I believe it would be a slightly different mechanism. All else equal, if the cost of gilt repo is higher, banks should be less likely to repo out their gilts to the BoE for cash, which would also result in lower reserves.  

---

