<p>I cannot directly answer your question, but I think I can shed some light. What I seem to show is that under some restrictions, the unconditional variance is finite. However, I am not sure how to relate my answer to the notion of volatility clustering.</p>

<p>Note that if we assume stationarity, then $\sigma^2=E(\epsilon_t^2)$ for all $t$ and it follows by the law of total expectations that $$\sigma^2=E(E(\epsilon_t^2|I_{t-1}))=E(h_t)=\alpha_0+\alpha_1\sigma^2+\alpha_2\sigma^2$$ using your expression for $h_t$. Thus, $\sigma^2=\frac{\alpha_0}{1-(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)}$ is <em>a</em> solution whenever $\alpha_1+\alpha_2&lt;1$. </p>

<p>Now, by the law of total variance, \begin{align*}V(Y_t)&amp;=E(V(Y_t|I_{t-1}))+V(E(Y_t|I_{t-1}))\\
&amp;=E(\epsilon_t^2)+V(\mu_t)\\
&amp;=\sigma^2+a_1^2V(Y_{t-1}) \end{align*} using your results, where $\mu_t=a_0+a_1 Y_{t-1}$. Assuming stationarity, and thus that the variance is constant for all $t$, it follows that $$V(Y_t)=\frac{\sigma^2}{1-a_1^2}$$ is <em>a</em> solution for $a_1\neq\pm 1$ and $\alpha_1+\alpha_2&lt;1$.</p>

<p>I encourage you to clearly note my assumptions. I cannot further assess this answer as I know next to nothing about time series. </p>

<p>(Also note that we from the assumption of stationarity have that $E(Y_t)=a_0+a_1E(Y_{t-1})$ implies that $$E(Y_t)=\frac{a_0}{1-a_1}$$ is <em>a</em> solution.)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-11-24T17:18:12.087Z
2016-11-28T14:08:47.030Z
2016-11-28T14:08:47.030Z
Elias
<p>I am in the process of working through some problem sets. I have studied some time series, but my knowledge of ARCH models is pretty basic. I am given the following information:</p>

<p>$Y_t = a_0 + a_1 Y_{t-1} + \epsilon_t$</p>

<p>where $\epsilon_t | I_{t-1} \sim N(0,h_t)$ and $h_t = \alpha_0 + \alpha_1 \epsilon_{t-1}^2 + \alpha_2  \epsilon_{t-2}^2$</p>

<p>I solved for the following,</p>

<p><strong>Conditional variance:</strong></p>

<p>$E(Y_t | I_{t-1}) = a_0 + a_1 Y_{t-1}= \mu$</p>

<p>then </p>

<p>$Var(Y_t)=E[(Y_t- \mu)^2] = E(E_t^2) = ht = \alpha_0 + \alpha_1 \epsilon_{t-1}^2 + \alpha_2  \epsilon_{t-2}^2$</p>

<p><strong>Unconditional Variance:</strong></p>

<p>At this point I think we can create a new series for $Y_t$ since we are not conditioning, so I wrote,</p>

<p>$Y_t = a_0 + a_1 (a_0 + a_1 Y_{t-2} + \epsilon_{t-1}) + \epsilon_t$, repeat this infinitely many times and get</p>

<p>$Y_t = \frac{a_0}{1-a_1} + \sum_{j=0}^\infty a_1^j \epsilon_{t-j}$</p>

<p>$E(Y_t) = \frac{a_0}{1-a_1}$ and </p>

<p>$Var(Y_t) = E[(Y_t - \mu )^2] = \sum_{j=0}^\infty a_1^{2j} \epsilon_{t-j}^2 = (\alpha_0 + \alpha_1 \epsilon_{t-1}^2 + \alpha_2  \epsilon_{t-2}^2) + a_1^2 (\alpha_0 + \alpha_1 \epsilon_{t-2}^2 + \alpha_2  \epsilon_{t-3}^2) + a_1^4(\alpha_0 + \alpha_1 \epsilon_{t-3}^2 + \alpha_2  \epsilon_{t-4}^2) + \dots$</p>

<p>I am not sure if this cleans up nicely, but what does this say for the variance? it seems like the unconditional is just going to blow up infinitely (given I could have made a mistake in the derivation of this question). I am also not sure if I should state some stability conditions in this question similar to AR(1) processes (e.g., $\alpha_1 &lt; 1$ and $\alpha_2 &lt; 1$), since these are variances do those conditions apply? </p>

<p>If I was to conclude a statement, is it acceptable to stay the model captures volatility clustering via 2 period lags?</p>

<time-series><autoregressive>
Conditional variance vs. unconditional variance in ARCH model
jbrau
# Conditional variance vs. unconditional variance in ARCH model

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-11-24)

I am in the process of working through some problem sets. I have studied some time series, but my knowledge of ARCH models is pretty basic. I am given the following information:

$Y\_t = a\_0 + a\_1 Y\_{t-1} + \epsilon\_t$

where $\epsilon\_t | I\_{t-1} \sim N(0,h\_t)$ and $h\_t = \alpha\_0 + \alpha\_1 \epsilon\_{t-1}^2 + \alpha\_2 \epsilon\_{t-2}^2$

I solved for the following,

**Conditional variance:**

$E(Y\_t | I\_{t-1}) = a\_0 + a\_1 Y\_{t-1}= \mu$

then

$Var(Y\_t)=E[(Y\_t- \mu)^2] = E(E\_t^2) = ht = \alpha\_0 + \alpha\_1 \epsilon\_{t-1}^2 + \alpha\_2 \epsilon\_{t-2}^2$

**Unconditional Variance:**

At this point I think we can create a new series for $Y\_t$ since we are not conditioning, so I wrote,

$Y\_t = a\_0 + a\_1 (a\_0 + a\_1 Y\_{t-2} + \epsilon\_{t-1}) + \epsilon\_t$, repeat this infinitely many times and get

$Y\_t = \frac{a\_0}{1-a\_1} + \sum\_{j=0}^\infty a\_1^j \epsilon\_{t-j}$

$E(Y\_t) = \frac{a\_0}{1-a\_1}$ and

$Var(Y\_t) = E[(Y\_t - \mu )^2] = \sum\_{j=0}^\infty a\_1^{2j} \epsilon\_{t-j}^2 = (\alpha\_0 + \alpha\_1 \epsilon\_{t-1}^2 + \alpha\_2 \epsilon\_{t-2}^2) + a\_1^2 (\alpha\_0 + \alpha\_1 \epsilon\_{t-2}^2 + \alpha\_2 \epsilon\_{t-3}^2) + a\_1^4(\alpha\_0 + \alpha\_1 \epsilon\_{t-3}^2 + \alpha\_2 \epsilon\_{t-4}^2) + \dots$

I am not sure if this cleans up nicely, but what does this say for the variance? it seems like the unconditional is just going to blow up infinitely (given I could have made a mistake in the derivation of this question). I am also not sure if I should state some stability conditions in this question similar to AR(1) processes (e.g., $\alpha\_1 < 1$ and $\alpha\_2 < 1$), since these are variances do those conditions apply?

If I was to conclude a statement, is it acceptable to stay the model captures volatility clustering via 2 period lags?

**Tags:** time-series, autoregressive


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2016-11-24. Score: 3

I cannot directly answer your question, but I think I can shed some light. What I seem to show is that under some restrictions, the unconditional variance is finite. However, I am not sure how to relate my answer to the notion of volatility clustering.

Note that if we assume stationarity, then $\sigma^2=E(\epsilon\_t^2)$ for all $t$ and it follows by the law of total expectations that $$\sigma^2=E(E(\epsilon\_t^2|I\_{t-1}))=E(h\_t)=\alpha\_0+\alpha\_1\sigma^2+\alpha\_2\sigma^2$$ using your expression for $h\_t$. Thus, $\sigma^2=\frac{\alpha\_0}{1-(\alpha\_1+\alpha\_2)}$ is *a* solution whenever $\alpha\_1+\alpha\_2<1$.

Now, by the law of total variance, \begin{align\*}V(Y\_t)&=E(V(Y\_t|I\_{t-1}))+V(E(Y\_t|I\_{t-1}))\\
&=E(\epsilon\_t^2)+V(\mu\_t)\\
&=\sigma^2+a\_1^2V(Y\_{t-1}) \end{align\*} using your results, where $\mu\_t=a\_0+a\_1 Y\_{t-1}$. Assuming stationarity, and thus that the variance is constant for all $t$, it follows that $$V(Y\_t)=\frac{\sigma^2}{1-a\_1^2}$$ is *a* solution for $a\_1\neq\pm 1$ and $\alpha\_1+\alpha\_2<1$.

I encourage you to clearly note my assumptions. I cannot further assess this answer as I know next to nothing about time series.

(Also note that we from the assumption of stationarity have that $E(Y\_t)=a\_0+a\_1E(Y\_{t-1})$ implies that $$E(Y\_t)=\frac{a\_0}{1-a\_1}$$ is *a* solution.)


---

