<p>There are three big reasons for this:</p>

<p>1) It takes time for businesses to price inflation in. As a business owner I am unlikely to raise my prices from <code>$1.0</code> in year 1 to <code>$1.04</code> in year 2 to account for 4% increase in the money supply. Instead I am likely to wait until I can justifiably raise the price to <code>$1.25</code> or some other price that makes more sense for marketing. As a result there will be a lag between inflation and the money supply. In the long run I will choose to price money supply into my prices thus driving inflation but on a yearly basis in the short run businesses will not perfectly price in the money supply.</p>

<p>2) Money supply primarily drives inflation in the long term however short term price shocks can significantly affect inflation. For example if the price of oil suddenly drops due to discovery of new shale reserves in the United States that will be reflected in a drop in price levels across the entire country. For any business the cost of production, transportation, etc. has dropped which will be reflected in a drop in the price level (which dictates inflation) despite no change in the money supply. </p>

<p>3) Economic growth drives deflation even if the monetary base stays the same size. If there is economic growth through an increase in efficiency (i.e new technology) then the value of money will go up. If there is <code>$100</code> in an economy and the only product within the country is 100 widgets which are produced every year with the past year's 100 widgets being consumed then the price of a widget would be <code>$1</code>. If suddenly a new type of tech allows us to build widgets for half the cost we could now produce 200 widgets in this economy using the same resources and capital stock. With the same <code>$100</code> you can now buy 200 widgets or <code>$.5</code> per widget. Effectively this means that the price level has gone down and that the value of a dollar has gone up. This happens in the real world through increases in technology and is the driving reason for a long run increase in the monetary base for almost all economies. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-05-05T15:29:28.547Z
2017-05-05T15:35:55.707Z
2017-05-05T15:35:55.707Z
TheSaint321
<p>It could just be a sign of house price deflation, or at least house prices rising but not keeping up with inflation. Here's my reasoning...</p>

<p>Assuming you already know that under fractional reserve banking new loans increase the money supply and the repayment of existing loans decreases the money supply... the bulk of loans/repayments are in connection with house buying, so the growth or shrinkage of the money supply will often reflect the enthusiasm for house purchasing. The price of houses is not reflected properly in most inflation measures, so deflation of house prices does not show up in inflation figures.</p>

<p>The opposite was going on in the UK in the run up to the crash of 2007/8. For many years there was rapid growth in the money supply (10% ish) while inflation was more like 2-3%.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-05T13:09:05.903Z
This is pure speculation.
Tobias
CC BY-SA 4.0
2017-01-05T10:14:55.487Z
2019-05-02T11:28:45.460Z
2019-05-02T11:28:45.460Z
Mick
<p>I'm thinking the case of Argentina. In 2016, prices raised about 40% but according to the central bank of Argentina, money supply grew only 30%. Is this going to have an effect in 2017?
What could we expect to happen in general when money supply grows slower than inflation for a given period?</p>

<p>Thank you in advance.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-04T10:15:23.447Z
Generally speaking, keep in mind that inflation, in the long run at least, always has a monetary cause. But raising the money supply doesn't mean that inflation goes up immediately (it can occur with a time lag, or not at all since velocity is also an important factor - so it's not clear whether it has an effect in 2017). In the case of ARG I would generally suspicious since the government is famous for reporting rigged CPI numbers.    As long as the money supply grows substantially, we would expect inflation.
Fitzroy Hogsflesh
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-04T10:38:38.603Z
This is a mix of behavior science(price awareness) , (production) policies driven and demands. There is little you can predict except speculation.  Money supply and inflation relationship is never linear. Market take time to response, and the results are always base on previous experience.  A  30% inflation that cause 40% price increase, but a  3% inflation may show a 1% price increase.   You will no see much changes (discount all other variable) if the money supplies are not reduce drastically (say from 30% to 10%)
mootmoot
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-04T10:39:23.040Z
Which type of money are you looking at? M1? M2? M3?
Mick
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-04T18:29:01.477Z
Thank you all for your answers. @FranzPlumpton Since the change of government in december 2015, there's a consensus of economists that CPI numbers are now accurate.
gabyarg25
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-04T18:29:14.443Z
So based on what FranzPlumpton and @mootmoot said, we can only speculate on 2017 and hope that the central bank will be able to further reduce the money supply.
gabyarg25
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-04T18:31:24.767Z
@Mick It is listed as "Circulacion monetaria" which I think it best translates to "Money supply". M1 grew 27,7% and M2 30,3%
gabyarg25
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-05T13:07:52.853Z
Your question is way to vague to get any useful answer.
Tobias
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-05T23:16:48.430Z
@Tobias What additional information you think I'm missing in order to not be "vague"? Saying it is a vague question is not useful either.
gabyarg25
<inflation><economic-growth><money-supply>
What happens if money supply grows more slowly than inflation?
gabyarg25
# What happens if money supply grows more slowly than inflation?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-01-04)

I'm thinking the case of Argentina. In 2016, prices raised about 40% but according to the central bank of Argentina, money supply grew only 30%. Is this going to have an effect in 2017?
What could we expect to happen in general when money supply grows slower than inflation for a given period?

Thank you in advance.

**Tags:** inflation, economic-growth, money-supply

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Generally speaking, keep in mind that inflation, in the long run at least, always has a monetary cause. But raising the money supply doesn't mean that inflation goes up immediately (it can occur with a time lag, or not at all since velocity is also an important factor - so it's not clear whether it has an effect in 2017). In the case of ARG I would generally suspicious since the government is famous for reporting rigged CPI numbers.    As long as the money supply grows substantially, we would expect inflation.  
> **username_2**: This is a mix of behavior science(price awareness) , (production) policies driven and demands. There is little you can predict except speculation.  Money supply and inflation relationship is never linear. Market take time to response, and the results are always base on previous experience.  A  30% inflation that cause 40% price increase, but a  3% inflation may show a 1% price increase.   You will no see much changes (discount all other variable) if the money supplies are not reduce drastically (say from 30% to 10%)  
> **username_3**: Which type of money are you looking at? M1? M2? M3?  
> **username_0**: Thank you all for your answers. @FranzPlumpton Since the change of government in december 2015, there's a consensus of economists that CPI numbers are now accurate.  
> **username_0**: So based on what FranzPlumpton and @username_2 said, we can only speculate on 2017 and hope that the central bank will be able to further reduce the money supply.  
> **username_0**: @username_3 It is listed as "Circulacion monetaria" which I think it best translates to "Money supply". M1 grew 27,7% and M2 30,3%  
> **username_4**: Your question is way to vague to get any useful answer.  
> **username_0**: @username_4 What additional information you think I'm missing in order to not be "vague"? Saying it is a vague question is not useful either.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2017-05-05. Score: 1

There are three big reasons for this:

1) It takes time for businesses to price inflation in. As a business owner I am unlikely to raise my prices from `$1.0` in year 1 to `$1.04` in year 2 to account for 4% increase in the money supply. Instead I am likely to wait until I can justifiably raise the price to `$1.25` or some other price that makes more sense for marketing. As a result there will be a lag between inflation and the money supply. In the long run I will choose to price money supply into my prices thus driving inflation but on a yearly basis in the short run businesses will not perfectly price in the money supply.

2) Money supply primarily drives inflation in the long term however short term price shocks can significantly affect inflation. For example if the price of oil suddenly drops due to discovery of new shale reserves in the United States that will be reflected in a drop in price levels across the entire country. For any business the cost of production, transportation, etc. has dropped which will be reflected in a drop in the price level (which dictates inflation) despite no change in the money supply.

3) Economic growth drives deflation even if the monetary base stays the same size. If there is economic growth through an increase in efficiency (i.e new technology) then the value of money will go up. If there is `$100` in an economy and the only product within the country is 100 widgets which are produced every year with the past year's 100 widgets being consumed then the price of a widget would be `$1`. If suddenly a new type of tech allows us to build widgets for half the cost we could now produce 200 widgets in this economy using the same resources and capital stock. With the same `$100` you can now buy 200 widgets or `$.5` per widget. Effectively this means that the price level has gone down and that the value of a dollar has gone up. This happens in the real world through increases in technology and is the driving reason for a long run increase in the monetary base for almost all economies.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-01-05. Score: -2

It could just be a sign of house price deflation, or at least house prices rising but not keeping up with inflation. Here's my reasoning...

Assuming you already know that under fractional reserve banking new loans increase the money supply and the repayment of existing loans decreases the money supply... the bulk of loans/repayments are in connection with house buying, so the growth or shrinkage of the money supply will often reflect the enthusiasm for house purchasing. The price of houses is not reflected properly in most inflation measures, so deflation of house prices does not show up in inflation figures.

The opposite was going on in the UK in the run up to the crash of 2007/8. For many years there was rapid growth in the money supply (10% ish) while inflation was more like 2-3%.

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: This is pure speculation.  

---

