<p>Your professor want probably that you compute the keynesian multiplicator (hint: once you have the general formula, replace dT by dG and see what you get).</p>

<p>Intuition: if you raise G, you will raise your GDP. As Y increases, your consumption increases. But the taxes (T, lump sum) increase also, so the consumption decreases (it depends of the disposable income). The overall effect is a 1 to 1 increase of your GDP.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-30T17:38:14.253Z
I am worrying about the case where the tax is not lump sum, which could lead to inefficiency.
Kun
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-30T20:18:03.500Z
I have rejected your edit on the question. When changing author's intent (even in cases where you see a mistake), it is usually better to notify OP on their mistake instead of editing it out yourself.
FooBar
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-30T13:11:12.243Z
2015-04-30T13:11:12.243Z
Yann
<p>This question is too vague to be answered, there are many factors. One, for example:</p>

<ul>
<li>Do the households receive utility from how the government is spending the money? E.g. the government spends it on public education, and the households like that versus the government spends it on expensive parties / military / whatever the households don't favor.</li>
</ul>

<p>This is relevant because <em>if</em> the households receive utility from what the government is doing with the money, they will "<em>feel richer</em>" - the expenditure has a wealth effect (and is neutral in case of no other rigidities). In the other case, even with lump sump taxation, households will feel poorer and respond differently.</p>

<p>If you want to look more into this, solve the following simple optimization problem:</p>

<p>$$ \max_{c,l} U(c + G(T),l) \text{ s.t. } c = w(1-l) + a - T $$</p>

<p>where $a$ is assets, $T$ is the lump sump taxation, and $c$ and $l$ are consumption and leisure. Look at the impact of different functional forms of $G(T)$ onto the optimal choice. For example: $G(T) = T$, $G(T) = 0.5 T$, and $G(T) = 0$. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-30T23:57:28.660Z
2015-04-30T23:57:28.660Z
FooBar
<p>The question is "If the government of country Z increases spending by \$12 million dollars and raises tax collections by the same amount, then what will be the overall impact of theses moves on real GDP in country Z." The official solution is that real GDP will increase by \$12 million because it is a balanced budget move.</p>

<p>However, I think it depends. Increased tax collection will discourage production while the spending would encourage production. Any suggestions will be appreciated.</p>

<macroeconomics>
What are the consequences of government spending by imposing tax?
Kun
# What are the consequences of government spending by imposing tax?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-30)

The question is "If the government of country Z increases spending by \$12 million dollars and raises tax collections by the same amount, then what will be the overall impact of theses moves on real GDP in country Z." The official solution is that real GDP will increase by \$12 million because it is a balanced budget move.

However, I think it depends. Increased tax collection will discourage production while the spending would encourage production. Any suggestions will be appreciated.

**Tags:** macroeconomics


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-04-30. Score: 2

Your professor want probably that you compute the keynesian multiplicator (hint: once you have the general formula, replace dT by dG and see what you get).

Intuition: if you raise G, you will raise your GDP. As Y increases, your consumption increases. But the taxes (T, lump sum) increase also, so the consumption decreases (it depends of the disposable income). The overall effect is a 1 to 1 increase of your GDP.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I am worrying about the case where the tax is not lump sum, which could lead to inefficiency.  
> **username_2**: I have rejected your edit on the question. When changing author's intent (even in cases where you see a mistake), it is usually better to notify OP on their mistake instead of editing it out yourself.  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-04-30. Score: 0

This question is too vague to be answered, there are many factors. One, for example:

* Do the households receive utility from how the government is spending the money? E.g. the government spends it on public education, and the households like that versus the government spends it on expensive parties / military / whatever the households don't favor.

This is relevant because *if* the households receive utility from what the government is doing with the money, they will "*feel richer*" - the expenditure has a wealth effect (and is neutral in case of no other rigidities). In the other case, even with lump sump taxation, households will feel poorer and respond differently.

If you want to look more into this, solve the following simple optimization problem:

$$ \max\_{c,l} U(c + G(T),l) \text{ s.t. } c = w(1-l) + a - T $$

where $a$ is assets, $T$ is the lump sump taxation, and $c$ and $l$ are consumption and leisure. Look at the impact of different functional forms of $G(T)$ onto the optimal choice. For example: $G(T) = T$, $G(T) = 0.5 T$, and $G(T) = 0$.


---

