<ol start="0">
<li><p>If a good exhibits Giffen behavior at a certain price level, it implies that a (slightly) higher price will result in greater demand.</p>
</li>
<li><p>The Giffen property is local, a good cannot behave as a Giffen good at all price levels, because eventually the consumer/consumers spend all their money on this good, after which a further price raise will decrease demand.</p>
</li>
<li><p>As you point out, the profit motive will give the monopoly incentive to raise the price if this does not decrease demand.</p>
</li>
<li><p>There are some caveats depending on the models details. If the monopoly is contractually obligated to satisfy all demand at the set price level, then raising the price may be non-profitable even under Giffen circumstances: if the cost function is &quot;very convex&quot;, the costs may increase even faster than demand.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>+1. Giffen goods are interesting, but as pointed out above, this is never a global behavior (the property never holds for all price levels). It is also seldom observed in real life.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-05T07:05:48.120Z
2022-11-05T07:05:48.120Z
Giskard
<p>I’m taking an intermediate microeconomics course in college and just got to the topic of monopolies. I know the concept of a Giffen good.</p>
<p>As always, Revenue is given by <span class="math-container">$R= Pq$</span>.
Since the monopoly has market power, <span class="math-container">$P$</span> is not constant.
Therefore, the marginal revenue is
<span class="math-container">$MR = P + q \frac{dP}{dq} = P (1 + \frac{q}{p} \frac{dP}{dq})
= P (1 + \epsilon^{-1})$</span> where <span class="math-container">$\epsilon$</span> is the own price elasticity of the demand.</p>
<p>My lecturer then showed these three cases:</p>
<ul>
<li>Elastic demand <span class="math-container">$(\epsilon &lt; -1)$</span>: <span class="math-container">$MR&gt;0$</span></li>
<li>Unit elasticity <span class="math-container">$(\epsilon = -1)$</span>: <span class="math-container">$MR=0$</span></li>
<li>Inelastic demand <span class="math-container">$(-1&lt;\epsilon&lt;0)$</span>: <span class="math-container">$MR&lt;0$</span></li>
</ul>
<p>Therefore we would be more likely to encounter monopolies on elastic goods.</p>
<p>It made me think: Giffen good <span class="math-container">$(\epsilon &gt; 0)$</span>: <span class="math-container">$MR&gt;0$</span>. In fact <span class="math-container">$MR&gt;P$</span>.</p>
<p>The theory of monopolies says that since each extra unit of good produced would decrease <span class="math-container">$P$</span> (from the demand curve it follows that <span class="math-container">$P$</span> must decrease in order for those extra units to be demanded) the firm would have to find some optimal quantity that maximizes its profits. But in Giffen goods, for a higher quantity to be demanded <span class="math-container">$P$</span> must increase. This would mean <span class="math-container">$P$</span> would increase as they produce more units.</p>
<p>So wouldn’t a monopolistic firm want to produce even more and more units forever, for theoretically infinite profits?</p>
<p>I’m asking this since the Giffen good case was left out of my lecture and this Giffen good stuff awakens my curiosity. Maybe it was left out because there is some catch.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>

<elasticity><monopoly><giffen-goods>
Monopolies on Giffen Goods
Nicolas Torres
# Monopolies on Giffen Goods

(Asked by: username_0 on 2022-11-05)

I’m taking an intermediate microeconomics course in college and just got to the topic of monopolies. I know the concept of a Giffen good.

As always, Revenue is given by $R= Pq$.
Since the monopoly has market power, $P$ is not constant.
Therefore, the marginal revenue is
$MR = P + q \frac{dP}{dq} = P (1 + \frac{q}{p} \frac{dP}{dq})
= P (1 + \epsilon^{-1})$ where $\epsilon$ is the own price elasticity of the demand.

My lecturer then showed these three cases:

* Elastic demand $(\epsilon < -1)$: $MR>0$
* Unit elasticity $(\epsilon = -1)$: $MR=0$
* Inelastic demand $(-1<\epsilon<0)$: $MR<0$

Therefore we would be more likely to encounter monopolies on elastic goods.

It made me think: Giffen good $(\epsilon > 0)$: $MR>0$. In fact $MR>P$.

The theory of monopolies says that since each extra unit of good produced would decrease $P$ (from the demand curve it follows that $P$ must decrease in order for those extra units to be demanded) the firm would have to find some optimal quantity that maximizes its profits. But in Giffen goods, for a higher quantity to be demanded $P$ must increase. This would mean $P$ would increase as they produce more units.

So wouldn’t a monopolistic firm want to produce even more and more units forever, for theoretically infinite profits?

I’m asking this since the Giffen good case was left out of my lecture and this Giffen good stuff awakens my curiosity. Maybe it was left out because there is some catch.

Thanks in advance

**Tags:** elasticity, monopoly, giffen-goods


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2022-11-05. Score: 6 | Accepted answer

0. If a good exhibits Giffen behavior at a certain price level, it implies that a (slightly) higher price will result in greater demand.
1. The Giffen property is local, a good cannot behave as a Giffen good at all price levels, because eventually the consumer/consumers spend all their money on this good, after which a further price raise will decrease demand.
2. As you point out, the profit motive will give the monopoly incentive to raise the price if this does not decrease demand.
3. There are some caveats depending on the models details. If the monopoly is contractually obligated to satisfy all demand at the set price level, then raising the price may be non-profitable even under Giffen circumstances: if the cost function is "very convex", the costs may increase even faster than demand.

+1. Giffen goods are interesting, but as pointed out above, this is never a global behavior (the property never holds for all price levels). It is also seldom observed in real life.


---

