<p>Your argument seems to be going from top to bottom. PPP goes from bottom to top. It is based on the law of one price. That means, assuming perfect goods arbitrage (there's the first catch) and complete markets, meaning that each good is traded in each market (there's the second catch), and assuming away transactions and other costs and a bunch of other things, such as productivity growth differentials (there's yet another catch), price level ratios in any two countries are equal to nominal exchange rates between the two countries.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-03-11T04:35:07.860Z
2024-03-11T04:35:07.860Z
Pavel Filip
<p>On the exact definition and understanding of "purchasing power parity" it depends what it means when the World Bank defines</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em>the “extremely poor” people of the world as those who are currently
  living on no more than $1 per day per person, measured at the
  purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rate</em></p>
</blockquote>

<p>as cited e.g. in Duflo/Banerjee's <a href="https://economics.mit.edu/files/805" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Economic Lives of the Poor</a> (2006).</p>

<p>According to the Wikipedia article on purchasing power parity</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parity" rel="nofollow noreferrer">PPP produces an exchange rate that equals the price of the basket of
  goods at one location over the price of the basket of goods at a
  different location.</a></em></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Furthermore it is stated:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parity#Range_and_quality_of_goods" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The goods that a currency has the "power" to purchase are a basket
  of goods of different types.</a></em></p>
</blockquote>

<p>So PPP depends on a basket of goods, and it seems to be assumed that there is <strong>one</strong> such basket. But obviously there is none such unique basket: In different countries and in different <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_stratification" rel="nofollow noreferrer">socioeconomic strata</a> there are very <strong>different</strong> "typical" baskets of goods - so how to compare these, across countries and strata? </p>

<p>In other words (and trying to be specific): What exactly does it mean (according to the official definition) when it is for example said that an Indian farmer (let his name be Kalu) in the state of Rajasthan who </p>

<ul>
<li>exhibits typical consumer behaviour (= has a typical basket of goods, including spendings on religious festivals) </li>
<li>is partially self-supplying </li>
<li>does a second job as a tourist camel guide</li>
<li>does a third job as a quarryman</li>
<li>has a monthly income of 10,000 rupies (averaged over a year)</li>
</ul>

<p>lives on $X per day (measured at PPP exchange rate)? </p>

<p>But first of all: </p>

<p><strong>How exactly would I calculate X - given the information above + the
size/structure of his household?</strong></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-23T08:09:02.673Z
PPP calculations between countries are typically based on information collected for consumer price inflation (CPI) and other price calculations within countries.  In neither case is the typical basket of goods and services supposed to be specific to individuals but instead be representative of costs across the economy
Henry
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-23T08:16:37.700Z
@Henry: But the daily income measured at the PPP exchange rate is supposed to be specific to individuals, isn't it?
Hans-Peter Stricker
<microeconomics><exchange-rates><purchasing-power-partity>
Purchasing Power Parity and Baskets of Goods
Hans-Peter Stricker
# Purchasing Power Parity and Baskets of Goods

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-10-22)

On the exact definition and understanding of "purchasing power parity" it depends what it means when the World Bank defines

> *the “extremely poor” people of the world as those who are currently
> living on no more than $1 per day per person, measured at the
> purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rate*

as cited e.g. in Duflo/Banerjee's [The Economic Lives of the Poor](https://economics.mit.edu/files/805) (2006).

According to the Wikipedia article on purchasing power parity

> *[PPP produces an exchange rate that equals the price of the basket of
> goods at one location over the price of the basket of goods at a
> different location.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parity)*

Furthermore it is stated:

> *[The goods that a currency has the "power" to purchase are a basket
> of goods of different types.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parity#Range_and_quality_of_goods)*

So PPP depends on a basket of goods, and it seems to be assumed that there is **one** such basket. But obviously there is none such unique basket: In different countries and in different [socioeconomic strata](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_stratification) there are very **different** "typical" baskets of goods - so how to compare these, across countries and strata?

In other words (and trying to be specific): What exactly does it mean (according to the official definition) when it is for example said that an Indian farmer (let his name be Kalu) in the state of Rajasthan who

* exhibits typical consumer behaviour (= has a typical basket of goods, including spendings on religious festivals)
* is partially self-supplying
* does a second job as a tourist camel guide
* does a third job as a quarryman
* has a monthly income of 10,000 rupies (averaged over a year)

lives on $X per day (measured at PPP exchange rate)?

But first of all:

**How exactly would I calculate X - given the information above + the
size/structure of his household?**

**Tags:** microeconomics, exchange-rates, purchasing-power-partity

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: PPP calculations between countries are typically based on information collected for consumer price inflation (CPI) and other price calculations within countries.  In neither case is the typical basket of goods and services supposed to be specific to individuals but instead be representative of costs across the economy  
> **username_0**: @username_1: But the daily income measured at the PPP exchange rate is supposed to be specific to individuals, isn't it?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2024-03-11. Score: 0

Your argument seems to be going from top to bottom. PPP goes from bottom to top. It is based on the law of one price. That means, assuming perfect goods arbitrage (there's the first catch) and complete markets, meaning that each good is traded in each market (there's the second catch), and assuming away transactions and other costs and a bunch of other things, such as productivity growth differentials (there's yet another catch), price level ratios in any two countries are equal to nominal exchange rates between the two countries.


---

