<p>The passage from Krugman is quite confusingly written. What Krugman has in mind is not increase in production per se but increase in aggregate demand which is associated with more production.</p>
<p>The short run relationship between real output and price level (change in which gives you inflation) can be visualized on aggregate supply-aggregate demand (AS-AD) diagram (see Blanchard et al Macroeconomics or Mankiw Macroeconomics for more detail).</p>
<p>If production (Y) expands because economy is able to produce more and firms expand their production that will lead to decrease in prices (P) - and hence deflation.  As the picture I below drew shows, when economy produces more because firms on the whole supply more to the market (AS shifts to the right), the price level would be expected to fall ceteris paribus:</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/BsgaF.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/BsgaF.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>However, what Krugman has in mind is change in aggregate consumer preferences that shift demand more (i.e. AD shifts to the right), this will lead to higher prices and more production (in the short run) because this higher demand and prices motivate firms to supply more. However, Krugman makes it sound in the passage above as if there was increase in supply by firms (where the chains of events starts with more production rather than with more demand as in this second case).</p>
<p>In this case aggregate prices increase because people demand too many goods and services and firms can only satisfy that extra demand at higher cost (since production capability of economy given by AS did not change). Consequently, firms will only be willing to supply extra goods and services if they are motivated by higher prices.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/BWBeL.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/BWBeL.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-01T19:37:13.500Z
2021-03-01T19:49:48.943Z
2021-03-01T19:49:48.943Z
1muflon1
<blockquote>
<p>Why if the economy will produces too much there will be an increase of prices in nearly all goods and services?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The quoted excerpt is pure nonsense. The renown author as well as the editors of that &quot;Masterclass&quot; material need to go back to college and enroll in entry-level courses.</p>
<p>Producing &quot;too much&quot; indicates oversupply, which means that there is not enough demand for what is being produced. That contradicts author's belief that &quot;the demand for them outpaces production capabilities&quot;.</p>
<p>Another deficiency in the author's wording consists of saying &quot;low&quot; or &quot;high&quot; when speaking of &quot;<em>X</em> being inversely proportional to <em>Y</em>&quot;. &quot;Low&quot; and &quot;high&quot; are redundant, since they are inferred from the variables the relation involves.</p>
<p>Author's presumed link between production and able-bodied workers is inaccurate. Counterexample: In the 1950s, both IT production and the number of able-bodied IT workers were very scarce.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-01T21:50:45.433Z
2021-03-01T21:50:45.433Z
Iñaki Viggers
<p>I am taking an online Economics course and not understanding why if the economy will produces too much there will be an increase of prices in nearly all goods and services?</p>
<p>If for example there will be produced twice as much hats then needed, the price per hat will fall?</p>
<blockquote>
<p>An economy that <strong>produces too little</strong> will suffer from high
unemployment, since the low rate of employment opportunities will be
inversely proportional to the high number of able-bodied workers. An
<strong>economy that produces too much</strong> will see widespread increases in the
prices of nearly all goods and services as the demand for them
outpaces production capabilities. This general increase in prices is
known as inflation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>From Teaches Economics &amp; Society (MASTERCLASS) by PAUL KRUGMAN</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-01T23:13:07.900Z
Where does this come up? I remember watching Krugman's masterclass, but not this part.
Michael Greinecker
<inflation><financial-economics><nonexpert>
Why if the economy will produces too much there will be an increase of prices in nearly all goods and services?
Alexey Tseitlin
# Why if the economy will produces too much there will be an increase of prices in nearly all goods and services?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-03-01)

I am taking an online Economics course and not understanding why if the economy will produces too much there will be an increase of prices in nearly all goods and services?

If for example there will be produced twice as much hats then needed, the price per hat will fall?

> An economy that **produces too little** will suffer from high
> unemployment, since the low rate of employment opportunities will be
> inversely proportional to the high number of able-bodied workers. An
> **economy that produces too much** will see widespread increases in the
> prices of nearly all goods and services as the demand for them
> outpaces production capabilities. This general increase in prices is
> known as inflation.

From Teaches Economics & Society (MASTERCLASS) by PAUL KRUGMAN

**Tags:** inflation, financial-economics, nonexpert

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Where does this come up? I remember watching Krugman's masterclass, but not this part.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2021-03-01. Score: 2

The passage from Krugman is quite confusingly written. What Krugman has in mind is not increase in production per se but increase in aggregate demand which is associated with more production.

The short run relationship between real output and price level (change in which gives you inflation) can be visualized on aggregate supply-aggregate demand (AS-AD) diagram (see Blanchard et al Macroeconomics or Mankiw Macroeconomics for more detail).

If production (Y) expands because economy is able to produce more and firms expand their production that will lead to decrease in prices (P) - and hence deflation. As the picture I below drew shows, when economy produces more because firms on the whole supply more to the market (AS shifts to the right), the price level would be expected to fall ceteris paribus:

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/BsgaF.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/BsgaF.png)

However, what Krugman has in mind is change in aggregate consumer preferences that shift demand more (i.e. AD shifts to the right), this will lead to higher prices and more production (in the short run) because this higher demand and prices motivate firms to supply more. However, Krugman makes it sound in the passage above as if there was increase in supply by firms (where the chains of events starts with more production rather than with more demand as in this second case).

In this case aggregate prices increase because people demand too many goods and services and firms can only satisfy that extra demand at higher cost (since production capability of economy given by AS did not change). Consequently, firms will only be willing to supply extra goods and services if they are motivated by higher prices.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/BWBeL.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/BWBeL.png)


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2021-03-01. Score: 0

> Why if the economy will produces too much there will be an increase of prices in nearly all goods and services?

The quoted excerpt is pure nonsense. The renown author as well as the editors of that "Masterclass" material need to go back to college and enroll in entry-level courses.

Producing "too much" indicates oversupply, which means that there is not enough demand for what is being produced. That contradicts author's belief that "the demand for them outpaces production capabilities".

Another deficiency in the author's wording consists of saying "low" or "high" when speaking of "*X* being inversely proportional to *Y*". "Low" and "high" are redundant, since they are inferred from the variables the relation involves.

Author's presumed link between production and able-bodied workers is inaccurate. Counterexample: In the 1950s, both IT production and the number of able-bodied IT workers were very scarce.


---

