<p>Expressing consumption as</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$C = a + f(Y)$$</span></p>

<p>where <span class="math-container">$Y$</span> is income, there is nothing in the theory that forbids </p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$a &gt; f(Y)$$</span></p>

<p>even though the theoretical anticipation and the empirical regularity (i.e. for most people) is that <span class="math-container">$a &lt; f(Y)$</span>.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-17T02:45:03.680Z
What you said can not be true for all Y for all types of f(Y).
erik
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-17T02:47:31.523Z
@AlecosPapadopoulos Generally Autonomous consumption is lesser then income but it can be more than income ?
JIM
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-17T03:30:55.827Z
@erik Maybe not, but the question here is whether it _can_ be higher, not whether it is _always_ higher.
Alecos Papadopoulos
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-17T03:31:11.190Z
@JIM In theory yes. But even in theoretical models it is usually considered to be less.
Alecos Papadopoulos
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-18T04:06:54.243Z
@AlecosPapadopoulos I know. Just pointing out that the general nature of f in your answer might make a casual reader think that this is always true for all f.  I agree with your argument that the the question only asks for ‘can’.
erik
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-17T02:04:36.027Z
2018-11-17T02:04:36.027Z
Alecos Papadopoulos
<p>econ 101 , assume people are rational.<br>
imagine you are an irrational person who lives in an unreasonably poor 3rd world country where you mine diamonds for a living , you are paid a dollar(1.00),for your troubles but the cost of water and food a day cost a dollar 25 (1.25). then yes autonomous consumption can be greater than income.</p>

<p>but, assuming youre rational you'd realize the reward of working (income) is less than the cost to feed yourself(autonomous consumption), and will decide to be unemployed instead because thats the rational thing to do.</p>

<p>in summary all things being equal autonomous consumption "cannot" be greater than income .</p>

<p>keyword phrase = "all things being equal"</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-18T12:41:32.477Z
2018-12-18T12:41:32.477Z
YxngGod
<p>Autonomous consumption is done either through past savings or by borrowing money or selling asset to have minimum consumption in order to survive.</p>

<p>So can autonomous consumption be greater than our 1st level of consumption ?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-16T17:38:14.017Z
What is "1st level of consumption"?
Alecos Papadopoulos
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-17T01:26:15.730Z
@AlecosPapadopoulos In the schedule that we make of Income and Consumption . In which at level of zero income , we consume some amount (autonomous consumption) . But afterwards at when our income increases i.e from zero to something , we increase our consumption . The level in which our income has increased from _zero to something_ is what I am referring to as First level of Income . Apologies if I used the wrong term for it .
JIM
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-17T02:05:05.533Z
Indeed, there is not such term used in the literature.
Alecos Papadopoulos
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-17T02:45:21.180Z
@AlecosPapadopoulos I'm Still in high school and studying AD just now for first time . So I don't know much about the terms .
JIM
<consumption><national-income><aggregate-production>
Can Autonomous Consumption be Greater than Income of individual?
JIM
# Can Autonomous Consumption be Greater than Income of individual?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-11-16)

Autonomous consumption is done either through past savings or by borrowing money or selling asset to have minimum consumption in order to survive.

So can autonomous consumption be greater than our 1st level of consumption ?

**Tags:** consumption, national-income, aggregate-production

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: What is "1st level of consumption"?  
> **username_0**: @username_1 In the schedule that we make of Income and Consumption . In which at level of zero income , we consume some amount (autonomous consumption) . But afterwards at when our income increases i.e from zero to something , we increase our consumption . The level in which our income has increased from _zero to something_ is what I am referring to as First level of Income . Apologies if I used the wrong term for it .  
> **username_1**: Indeed, there is not such term used in the literature.  
> **username_0**: @username_1 I'm Still in high school and studying AD just now for first time . So I don't know much about the terms .  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-11-17. Score: 1

Expressing consumption as

$$C = a + f(Y)$$

where $Y$ is income, there is nothing in the theory that forbids

$$a > f(Y)$$

even though the theoretical anticipation and the empirical regularity (i.e. for most people) is that $a < f(Y)$.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: What you said can not be true for all Y for all types of f(Y).  
> **username_0**: @username_1 Generally Autonomous consumption is lesser then income but it can be more than income ?  
> **username_1**: @username_2 Maybe not, but the question here is whether it _can_ be higher, not whether it is _always_ higher.  
> **username_1**: @username_0 In theory yes. But even in theoretical models it is usually considered to be less.  
> **username_2**: @username_1 I know. Just pointing out that the general nature of f in your answer might make a casual reader think that this is always true for all f.  I agree with your argument that the the question only asks for ‘can’.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-12-18. Score: 0

econ 101 , assume people are rational.  
imagine you are an irrational person who lives in an unreasonably poor 3rd world country where you mine diamonds for a living , you are paid a dollar(1.00),for your troubles but the cost of water and food a day cost a dollar 25 (1.25). then yes autonomous consumption can be greater than income.

but, assuming youre rational you'd realize the reward of working (income) is less than the cost to feed yourself(autonomous consumption), and will decide to be unemployed instead because thats the rational thing to do.

in summary all things being equal autonomous consumption "cannot" be greater than income .

keyword phrase = "all things being equal"


---

