<p>It all comes to taxonomy. By definition of non-tariff barrier (<a href="https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2188-1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Beghin 2016)</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Non-tariff barriers (NTBs) refer to the wide range of policy interventions other than border tariffs that affect trade of goods, services and factors of production. Most taxonomies of NTBs include market-specific trade and domestic policies affecting trade in that market. Extended taxonomies include macroeconomic policies affecting trade. NTBs have gained importance as tariff levels have been reduced worldwide.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So by definition any policy that affects/limits trade that is <strong>not</strong> taxonomically tariff is a non-tariff barrier. Now when it comes to trade policy taxonomy anti-dumping duty is simply defined as a separate category from tariff (even though it might involve taxes at the border). Following <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1059056009001105#!" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Dinlersoz &amp; Dogan (2010)</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>...  A tariff is typically designed to maximize either domestic revenue or domestic welfare.
An anti-dumping duty, on the other hand, is usually set to make up for the difference between a foreign firm's price at home and the
price of its exports, provided that the latter is lower. ...</p>
<p>... Tariffs are usually imposed
uniformly on all foreign firms exporting a given good to a domestic market. Anti-dumping duties, on the other hand, target a
specific foreign firm or a group of firms which are claimed to be dumping, that is, selling at prices deemed “unfair”. The goal is to
restore fair pricing, where the yardstick of fairness is usually the price prevailing in the foreign market. The tools differ also in
terms of the institutional and political process they need to go through to be initiated. Furthermore, there are cases where antidumping duties are introduced in an industry already protected by tariffs. ...</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hence even though there are some similarities these policies will have their own separate categories and thus by definition anti-dumping duty is not a tariff (this is similar like in biology fox and wolf will be different categories of mammal even though they are similar animals).</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Also, one question additionally, are duties based on personal preferences, e.g. political motivation, also non-tariff barriers to trade?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Depends on what sort of duty it is and what it is conditional on. If it is tax on all foreign products of certain kind (coming from a specific country) then likely it would qualify as a tariff. If it is tax that is applied only to one foreign company due to some animosity likely it would not be tariff. However, the terms can be sometimes applied loosely.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:12:29.343Z
i feel so blessed by your answer! thank you very very much!
Laffa Yett
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:13:37.617Z
@LaffaYett you are welcome if you think it answered your question you can consider accepting it or if you think you need more answers wait and later accept some.
1muflon1
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:14:07.803Z
one question to the last point! yes it is a tax on all foreign products but the product of the companies which are political partners are taxed less. is it a non-tariff barrier than?
Laffa Yett
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:24:36.503Z
@LaffaYett ugh that is hard question I am actually not 100% sure. I think if it is set up in a way that there is a widely applied tax but some companies get some tax rabates or discounts it would count as a tariff. If it is some policy where companies pay individual taxes based on how they are connected I am not sure how that would be categorized. Usually even in very corrupt countries officials will try to put up a facade of impartiality so i don’t know of any examples of top of my head where there would be explicitly individualized taxes for companies
1muflon1
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:40:00.460Z
"Tariffs are usually imposed uniformly on all foreign firms exporting a given good to a domestic market" may be the theory behind WTO/GATT most-favoured-nation status, but does not apply to non-members, and with concessions and regional free-trade agreements and sanctions and a host of other issues may not really be the case
Henry
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:41:56.903Z
Henry Thank you for your Comment, can you elaborate what you are pointing out?
Laffa Yett
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:42:20.053Z
@Henry that is a fair point, thanks for pointing it out, I edited the answer a bit
1muflon1
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:43:29.297Z
@LaffaYett I think what a henry is getting at is that tariffs might be country specific. E.g. tariff on cheese from Russia might be 10% but on EU cheese just 5%
1muflon1
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:47:34.253Z
Oh thank you 1muflon1! one thing I wanted to add! there was an example where the taxes on wine imported to china, by a manufacturer that belonged to a pro china diplomat were taxed less than the wine imported by other Australian companies. I just wasn't sure about it being also non-tariff barriers. I mean, not saying good things and being in the position to do so, towards china, gave the other companies trade disadvantages! its so complicated.
Laffa Yett
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T23:06:59.283Z
@LaffaYett depends exactly how that was done. I suppose the exemption itself - if that is how it was done would be non-tariff barrier
1muflon1
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-05T20:07:08.123Z
2020-12-05T20:41:54.007Z
2020-12-05T20:41:54.007Z
1muflon1
<p>English is not my first language so sorry in advance!</p>
<p>please help me on this one I can't find a good answer, and until I have understood this one, I won't get the whole non-tariff barriers to trade thing.</p>
<p>so I've read a lot about duties being tariff barriers to trade.</p>
<p>but then I've read about the anti-dumping duties which are, despite being duties, non-tariff barriers to trade, and now I don't know why?</p>
<p>I'm hoping someone here could explain that to me.</p>
<p>Also, one question additionally, are duties based on personal preferences, e.g. political motivation, also non-tariff barriers to trade?</p>
<p>let's say I put a smaller duty on the product manufactured by a company that is owned by a &quot;political partner&quot;.</p>
<p>the parameters here are political usefulness and thus not directly correlated with trade.</p>
<p>is that a non-tariff barrier to trade then?</p>
<p>hoping for answers, thanks!</p>

<international-trade><barriers-to-entry>
Why are anti-dumping duties considered to be non-tariff barriers to trade?
Laffa Yett
# Why are anti-dumping duties considered to be non-tariff barriers to trade?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-12-05)

English is not my first language so sorry in advance!

please help me on this one I can't find a good answer, and until I have understood this one, I won't get the whole non-tariff barriers to trade thing.

so I've read a lot about duties being tariff barriers to trade.

but then I've read about the anti-dumping duties which are, despite being duties, non-tariff barriers to trade, and now I don't know why?

I'm hoping someone here could explain that to me.

Also, one question additionally, are duties based on personal preferences, e.g. political motivation, also non-tariff barriers to trade?

let's say I put a smaller duty on the product manufactured by a company that is owned by a "political partner".

the parameters here are political usefulness and thus not directly correlated with trade.

is that a non-tariff barrier to trade then?

hoping for answers, thanks!

**Tags:** international-trade, barriers-to-entry


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-12-05. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

It all comes to taxonomy. By definition of non-tariff barrier ([Beghin 2016)](https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2188-1):

> Non-tariff barriers (NTBs) refer to the wide range of policy interventions other than border tariffs that affect trade of goods, services and factors of production. Most taxonomies of NTBs include market-specific trade and domestic policies affecting trade in that market. Extended taxonomies include macroeconomic policies affecting trade. NTBs have gained importance as tariff levels have been reduced worldwide.

So by definition any policy that affects/limits trade that is **not** taxonomically tariff is a non-tariff barrier. Now when it comes to trade policy taxonomy anti-dumping duty is simply defined as a separate category from tariff (even though it might involve taxes at the border). Following [Dinlersoz & Dogan (2010)](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1059056009001105#!):

> ... A tariff is typically designed to maximize either domestic revenue or domestic welfare.
> An anti-dumping duty, on the other hand, is usually set to make up for the difference between a foreign firm's price at home and the
> price of its exports, provided that the latter is lower. ...
>
> ... Tariffs are usually imposed
> uniformly on all foreign firms exporting a given good to a domestic market. Anti-dumping duties, on the other hand, target a
> specific foreign firm or a group of firms which are claimed to be dumping, that is, selling at prices deemed “unfair”. The goal is to
> restore fair pricing, where the yardstick of fairness is usually the price prevailing in the foreign market. The tools differ also in
> terms of the institutional and political process they need to go through to be initiated. Furthermore, there are cases where antidumping duties are introduced in an industry already protected by tariffs. ...

Hence even though there are some similarities these policies will have their own separate categories and thus by definition anti-dumping duty is not a tariff (this is similar like in biology fox and wolf will be different categories of mammal even though they are similar animals).

> Also, one question additionally, are duties based on personal preferences, e.g. political motivation, also non-tariff barriers to trade?

Depends on what sort of duty it is and what it is conditional on. If it is tax on all foreign products of certain kind (coming from a specific country) then likely it would qualify as a tariff. If it is tax that is applied only to one foreign company due to some animosity likely it would not be tariff. However, the terms can be sometimes applied loosely.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: i feel so blessed by your answer! thank you very very much!  
> **username_1**: @username_0 you are welcome if you think it answered your question you can consider accepting it or if you think you need more answers wait and later accept some.  
> **username_0**: one question to the last point! yes it is a tax on all foreign products but the product of the companies which are political partners are taxed less. is it a non-tariff barrier than?  
> **username_1**: @username_0 ugh that is hard question I am actually not 100% sure. I think if it is set up in a way that there is a widely applied tax but some companies get some tax rabates or discounts it would count as a tariff. If it is some policy where companies pay individual taxes based on how they are connected I am not sure how that would be categorized. Usually even in very corrupt countries officials will try to put up a facade of impartiality so i don’t know of any examples of top of my head where there would be explicitly individualized taxes for companies  
> **username_2**: "Tariffs are usually imposed uniformly on all foreign firms exporting a given good to a domestic market" may be the theory behind WTO/GATT most-favoured-nation status, but does not apply to non-members, and with concessions and regional free-trade agreements and sanctions and a host of other issues may not really be the case  
> **username_0**: username_2 Thank you for your Comment, can you elaborate what you are pointing out?  
> **username_1**: @username_2 that is a fair point, thanks for pointing it out, I edited the answer a bit  
> **username_1**: @username_0 I think what a username_2 is getting at is that tariffs might be country specific. E.g. tariff on cheese from Russia might be 10% but on EU cheese just 5%  
> **username_0**: Oh thank you username_1! one thing I wanted to add! there was an example where the taxes on wine imported to china, by a manufacturer that belonged to a pro china diplomat were taxed less than the wine imported by other Australian companies. I just wasn't sure about it being also non-tariff barriers. I mean, not saying good things and being in the position to do so, towards china, gave the other companies trade disadvantages! its so complicated.  
> **username_1**: @username_0 depends exactly how that was done. I suppose the exemption itself - if that is how it was done would be non-tariff barrier  

---

