<p>I think you're looking for false precision, here.  "Years since graduation" is already a step function with an essentially arbitrary cutoff (should it really matter to your model that much if somebody is one day shy of being at the end of +1 years, versus one day into +2 years?  the actual difference is a few days.)</p>

<p>Just use age minus 23, or just use age in your model.  It shouldn't impact things that much either way.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-07T16:15:42.187Z
Fair enough, maybe age is good enough. But here's how I'm thinking about it. I don't care about the step function, time since graduation is totally fine. But let's say I'm trying to predict the income of someone who graduated last year at age 40. It would be bad to assume they'll make as much as the average 40 year old employee, because the average 40 year old employee has a decade of experience and raises. I've gotta figure out some way to account for that, otherwise I'll overshoot the income of older new graduates and undershoot the income of young people with experience.
Aidan O'Gara
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-06T20:52:34.353Z
2019-06-06T20:52:34.353Z
Bill Clark
<p>I'm trying to predict the income of graduates of certain Master's programs n years after graduation, using the American Community Survey individual level dataset to calibrate my equation. It gives me observations of individuals listing their income, age, degree program, and other variables, but doesn't tell me years since graduation or years in the workforce. How can I best predict income n years after graduation?</p>

<p>I'd like my final product to be a regression equation of the form: </p>

<p>income_year_n = starting_salary(many variables) * (1+rate_of_raises)^n</p>

<p>My initial approach is along the lines of:</p>

<ul>
<li>The youngest people with this degree are 23 years old. They all must have graduated the previous year. Use them to calibrate the starting_salary function. </li>
<li>The next youngest group is 24. They must either have one year of experience, or have just graduated. I know roughly the proportion for each, because I know how many 23 year olds there are in the dataset, but I don't know which are the new graduates and which graduated last year. </li>
<li>The next youngest is 25, this group has either 0, 1, or 2 years of experience, and I know the proportions for each. </li>
</ul>

<p>And so on. This feels like the beginning of an approach that would work, but I can't figure out how to go from this data to a regression equation that predicts income after a certain number of years. </p>

<p>Any ideas? I know there's no perfect solution, I'm looking for a close-enough hack to actually use the equation in the real world. Anything would be greatly appreciated, thanks a ton. </p>

<econometrics><statistics><applied-econometrics><micro-data>
How to predict income n years after graduation using income dataset with age, but not graduation year?
Aidan O'Gara
# How to predict income n years after graduation using income dataset with age, but not graduation year?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-06-06)

I'm trying to predict the income of graduates of certain Master's programs n years after graduation, using the American Community Survey individual level dataset to calibrate my equation. It gives me observations of individuals listing their income, age, degree program, and other variables, but doesn't tell me years since graduation or years in the workforce. How can I best predict income n years after graduation?

I'd like my final product to be a regression equation of the form:

income\_year\_n = starting\_salary(many variables) \* (1+rate\_of\_raises)^n

My initial approach is along the lines of:

* The youngest people with this degree are 23 years old. They all must have graduated the previous year. Use them to calibrate the starting\_salary function.
* The next youngest group is 24. They must either have one year of experience, or have just graduated. I know roughly the proportion for each, because I know how many 23 year olds there are in the dataset, but I don't know which are the new graduates and which graduated last year.
* The next youngest is 25, this group has either 0, 1, or 2 years of experience, and I know the proportions for each.

And so on. This feels like the beginning of an approach that would work, but I can't figure out how to go from this data to a regression equation that predicts income after a certain number of years.

Any ideas? I know there's no perfect solution, I'm looking for a close-enough hack to actually use the equation in the real world. Anything would be greatly appreciated, thanks a ton.

**Tags:** econometrics, statistics, applied-econometrics, micro-data


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-06-06. Score: 0

I think you're looking for false precision, here. "Years since graduation" is already a step function with an essentially arbitrary cutoff (should it really matter to your model that much if somebody is one day shy of being at the end of +1 years, versus one day into +2 years? the actual difference is a few days.)

Just use age minus 23, or just use age in your model. It shouldn't impact things that much either way.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Fair enough, maybe age is good enough. But here's how I'm thinking about it. I don't care about the step function, time since graduation is totally fine. But let's say I'm trying to predict the income of someone who graduated last year at age 40. It would be bad to assume they'll make as much as the average 40 year old employee, because the average 40 year old employee has a decade of experience and raises. I've gotta figure out some way to account for that, otherwise I'll overshoot the income of older new graduates and undershoot the income of young people with experience.  

---

