<p>Not many people are calling inflation a measure of purchasing power. And if they do, they shouldn't because it's wrong. Inflation is a measure of price changes over time. In itself it can't tell you anything about purchasing power.</p>
<p>However inflation is relevant for the calculation of how purchasing power changes over time. Purchasing power (of Households) can be defined as how much a household can buy of certain things (usually a basked of goods and services) with their income or wealth. So, for example, if your income or wealth hasn't changed since last year, but prices of these things have gone up, you can buy less of them, and you have lost purchasing power (and the other way round).</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-06-24T20:13:11.973Z
2022-06-25T11:50:25.787Z
2022-06-25T11:50:25.787Z
BrsG
<blockquote>
<p>I keep hearing that inflation is a measure of purchasing power. To me this means that if inflation is say, 3%, then purchasing power declines by 3%. That can' be true, yes?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Inflation is measure of positive <em>change</em> in price level, but increase in price level means loss of purchasing power. Also, yes if inflation is 3% you loose roughly 3% of your purchasing power.</p>
<p>Suppose at time <span class="math-container">$t=1$</span> apple costs \$1, you have \$100 on your account so you can purchase 100 apples. Now suppose there is 3% inflation meaning price level increased by 3% from 100 in <span class="math-container">$t=1$</span> to 103 in <span class="math-container">$t=2$</span>. In our economy where there are only apples that means their price had to increase to \$1.03. Now with your \$100 dollars you can only afford approximately 97.1 apples.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>During the 70s inflation was over 6%, but that doesn't tell you that on average you'd expect a 6% loss in gas purchasing power,</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Actually it would tell you that there was 6% drop in purchasing power for an average person. The thing is that in real economy (as opposed to the apple economy above) there are millions of goods and services. Price level is calculated from average change in prices of representative basket of this goods usually weighted so it reflects spending pattern of a typical person (see for example the <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=HICP_methodology" rel="nofollow noreferrer">eurostat</a> methodology).</p>
<p>But of course there will be 'lucky' people who spend more money on goods for which prices did not increased as quickly, but equally there will be 'suckers' who spend disproportionately on goods where prices rose faster than the average.</p>
<p>However, an average representative individual/household would expect to loose about 6% purchasing power if there is 6% inflation. Of course, based on your personal situation your experience might differ. Also most people are not exactly average my stats professor in undergraduate school used to say that humans have on average one testicle, but for some people the loss of purchasing power will be worse even if for some it might be better.</p>
<p>This being said unless you are on fixed income (e.g. retiree) usually your wage will also increase in time of inflation. If your wage increases by 4% when inflation is 6% then you will only be able to afford 2% less on monthly basis. But any money that you saved in the past will have 6% less value nonetheless.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-06-09T21:19:06.360Z
2022-06-09T21:31:59.283Z
2022-06-09T21:31:59.283Z
1muflon1
<p>I keep hearing that inflation is a measure of purchasing power. To me this means that if inflation is say, 3%, then purchasing power declines by 3%. That can' be true, yes? During the 70s inflation was over 6%, but that doesn't tell you that on average you'd expect a 6% loss in gas purchasing power, because gas prices were affected by the oil embargo crisis and foreign policy (the israeli military conflict at the time). Consumers saw gas prices inflate far, far more than 6%.</p>
<p>So how is it that we can say inflation is a measure of purchasing power? I can understand saying that inflation affects purchasing power, but for it to be a measure of it doesn't seem right.</p>

<inflation>
Inflation and Purchasing power
Lex_i
# Inflation and Purchasing power

(Asked by: username_0 on 2022-06-09)

I keep hearing that inflation is a measure of purchasing power. To me this means that if inflation is say, 3%, then purchasing power declines by 3%. That can' be true, yes? During the 70s inflation was over 6%, but that doesn't tell you that on average you'd expect a 6% loss in gas purchasing power, because gas prices were affected by the oil embargo crisis and foreign policy (the israeli military conflict at the time). Consumers saw gas prices inflate far, far more than 6%.

So how is it that we can say inflation is a measure of purchasing power? I can understand saying that inflation affects purchasing power, but for it to be a measure of it doesn't seem right.

**Tags:** inflation


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2022-06-24. Score: 2

Not many people are calling inflation a measure of purchasing power. And if they do, they shouldn't because it's wrong. Inflation is a measure of price changes over time. In itself it can't tell you anything about purchasing power.

However inflation is relevant for the calculation of how purchasing power changes over time. Purchasing power (of Households) can be defined as how much a household can buy of certain things (usually a basked of goods and services) with their income or wealth. So, for example, if your income or wealth hasn't changed since last year, but prices of these things have gone up, you can buy less of them, and you have lost purchasing power (and the other way round).


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2022-06-09. Score: 1

> I keep hearing that inflation is a measure of purchasing power. To me this means that if inflation is say, 3%, then purchasing power declines by 3%. That can' be true, yes?

Inflation is measure of positive *change* in price level, but increase in price level means loss of purchasing power. Also, yes if inflation is 3% you loose roughly 3% of your purchasing power.

Suppose at time $t=1$ apple costs \$1, you have \$100 on your account so you can purchase 100 apples. Now suppose there is 3% inflation meaning price level increased by 3% from 100 in $t=1$ to 103 in $t=2$. In our economy where there are only apples that means their price had to increase to \$1.03. Now with your \$100 dollars you can only afford approximately 97.1 apples.

> During the 70s inflation was over 6%, but that doesn't tell you that on average you'd expect a 6% loss in gas purchasing power,

Actually it would tell you that there was 6% drop in purchasing power for an average person. The thing is that in real economy (as opposed to the apple economy above) there are millions of goods and services. Price level is calculated from average change in prices of representative basket of this goods usually weighted so it reflects spending pattern of a typical person (see for example the [eurostat](https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=HICP_methodology) methodology).

But of course there will be 'lucky' people who spend more money on goods for which prices did not increased as quickly, but equally there will be 'suckers' who spend disproportionately on goods where prices rose faster than the average.

However, an average representative individual/household would expect to loose about 6% purchasing power if there is 6% inflation. Of course, based on your personal situation your experience might differ. Also most people are not exactly average my stats professor in undergraduate school used to say that humans have on average one testicle, but for some people the loss of purchasing power will be worse even if for some it might be better.

This being said unless you are on fixed income (e.g. retiree) usually your wage will also increase in time of inflation. If your wage increases by 4% when inflation is 6% then you will only be able to afford 2% less on monthly basis. But any money that you saved in the past will have 6% less value nonetheless.


---

