Answers.Body: <p>Current usage is 8 - that may include some old dev/stage installs by the authors - and almost certainly are 4.5 installs by current CiviCRM users (latest stable release for that extension).</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-04-21T18:46:53.757Z
Answers.Text: Could it be that extension still works just fine, but is not tested on CiviCRM 4.7?
Answers.UserDisplayName: Aivars
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-04-21T19:19:45.600Z
Answers.Text: That's not impossible - but it's not likely.
Answers.UserDisplayName: KarinG - Semper IT
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-10-18T19:04:49.290Z
Answers.Text: Curious did you try this extension on 4.7?
Answers.UserDisplayName: KarinG - Semper IT
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2017-04-21T12:07:30.747Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2017-04-21T12:17:00.507Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2017-04-21T12:17:00.507Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: KarinG - Semper IT
Body: <p>Is anyone successfully using Email Signature extension on CiviCRM 4.7?</p>
  
  <p><a href="https://civicrm.org/extensions/email-signature" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://civicrm.org/extensions/email-signature</a></p>
  
Tags: <email>
Title: Does Email Signature extension work on CiviCRM 4.7?
ThreadText: # Does Email Signature extension work on CiviCRM 4.7?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2017-04-21)
  
  Is anyone successfully using Email Signature extension on CiviCRM 4.7?
  
  <https://civicrm.org/extensions/email-signature>
  
  **Tags:** email
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2017-04-21. Score: 1
  
  Current usage is 8 - that may include some old dev/stage installs by the authors - and almost certainly are 4.5 installs by current CiviCRM users (latest stable release for that extension).
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Could it be that extension still works just fine, but is not tested on CiviCRM 4.7?  
  > **username_1**: That's not impossible - but it's not likely.  
  > **username_1**: Curious did you try this extension on 4.7?  
  
  ---
  
  