Answers.Body: <p>There is a JIRA issue <a href="https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-16980" rel="nofollow">CRM-16980</a> which is listed as fixed in 4.7. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-06-14T11:46:15.920Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-06-14T19:22:51.327Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2016-06-14T19:22:51.327Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Betty Dolfing
Body: <p>The list of relationships presented for selection when configuring a case type are B to A Relationships. The list available from which to add roles to cases contains A to B relationships. Is this correct? Why don't these lists present the same perspective of the relationship? </p>
  
Tags: <civicase>
Title: Why is the list of relationships presented when adding an additional role to a case different from those presented when configuring a case?
ThreadText: # Why is the list of relationships presented when adding an additional role to a case different from those presented when configuring a case?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2015-08-24)
  
  The list of relationships presented for selection when configuring a case type are B to A Relationships. The list available from which to add roles to cases contains A to B relationships. Is this correct? Why don't these lists present the same perspective of the relationship?
  
  **Tags:** civicase
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2016-06-14. Score: 1 | Accepted answer
  
  There is a JIRA issue [CRM-16980](https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-16980) which is listed as fixed in 4.7.
  
  
  ---
  
  