Answers.Body: <p>For posterity, I'll note that <a href="https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/8042" rel="nofollow">this issue is resolved</a> in CiviCRM 4.7.5+.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-10-17T22:52:10.087Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-10-17T22:52:10.087Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Jon G - Megaphone Tech
Answers.Body: <p>Someone posted this recently, and an issue was added to issues.civicrm.org</p>
  
  <p>I remember coming across this at FF and also logging an issue about it...</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-03-21T18:00:23.293Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-03-21T18:00:23.293Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: JohnFF
Body: <p>Has anyone else found the "Search All or by Date Range" option in "Manage Events" to return incorrect results, particularly if you have events that have a start date but no end date recorded?</p>
  
  <p>I've filed a bug (<a href="https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-18250" rel="nofollow">CRM-18250</a>) and I think I know where it is, but I'd be interested to know if others are also observing it.</p>
  
Tags: <civievent><search>
Title: Incorrect results appearing when searching for events by date range
ThreadText: # Incorrect results appearing when searching for events by date range
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2016-03-21)
  
  Has anyone else found the "Search All or by Date Range" option in "Manage Events" to return incorrect results, particularly if you have events that have a start date but no end date recorded?
  
  I've filed a bug ([CRM-18250](https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-18250)) and I think I know where it is, but I'd be interested to know if others are also observing it.
  
  **Tags:** civievent, search
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2016-10-17. Score: 1
  
  For posterity, I'll note that [this issue is resolved](https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/8042) in CiviCRM 4.7.5+.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2016-03-21. Score: 0
  
  Someone posted this recently, and an issue was added to issues.civicrm.org
  
  I remember coming across this at FF and also logging an issue about it...
  
  
  ---
  
  