Answers.Body: <p>First, try to separate the concepts of <em>content modeling</em> (how things are set up in the CP) and <em>information architecture</em> (how things are going to be presented to the user on the front-end site) in your mind. Are these “Employees” and “History” pages inherently sub-content of “About”, or is that just how you’re choosing to display it on the front-end? My hunch is it’s the latter, in which case a Structure section is not the right choice to begin with - and perhaps 3 separate Single sections makes more sense.</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>I don't want to use Entry Types, because I need to use the layouts in multiple places on the site. For example there's a Brochure-type page in the site's 'Careers' area. If something about the layout changes I don't want to have to go through multiple Entry Types to make the changes over and over.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>I feel you on the annoyance for having to maintain multiple (near-)identical field layouts, and this is something we hope to make better someday, but I would argue that it’s not going to be as bad in practice to keep these field groups in sync as you’re fearing – or at least not bad enough that the currently-possible workarounds will be worth the effort.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T23:07:17.260Z
Answers.Text: Fair point, and you're right, I was thinking of Structures as an IA solution and not a content model solution. I assumed that the Structure type was Craft's _navigation_ solution, but it looks like Craft doesn't yet have a comprehensive navigation model.
Answers.UserDisplayName: kmgdev
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T23:09:15.783Z
Answers.Text: @kgrote Right. There are one or two plugins that help with navigation, but currently Craft doesn’t have any built-in IA modeling features.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brandon Kelly
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T23:37:38.323Z
Answers.Text: Browsing the StackEx boards, it does seem like I'm not the only one who had that assumption, especially with the `{% nav %}` tag being associated with Structure-type entries. I think people are seeing the word "nav" and assuming that's Craft's navigation model and it's somehow tied to Structures.
Answers.UserDisplayName: kmgdev
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-10T00:43:41.367Z
Answers.Text: @kgrote there's many Craft users that use a structure named "Pages" with different Entry Types instead of singles. I think it's a great starting point for the site nav and as Entry Types are reusable you don't have to set up a Field Layout, paths and everything for every single page.
Answers.UserDisplayName: carlcs
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-10T00:57:52.837Z
Answers.Text: @kgrote I think this feature would make editing field layouts a lot better: http://feedback.buildwithcraft.com/forums/285221-feature-requests/suggestions/7260336-default-field-order ! Update the field group and just drag it into each Entry Type you use it unmodified to update its fields.
Answers.UserDisplayName: carlcs
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-10T13:20:38.773Z
Answers.Text: I just noticed there's actually two feature requests: http://feedback.buildwithcraft.com/forums/285221-feature-requests/suggestions/9902232-save-custom-order-of-fields-in-a-field-group
Answers.UserDisplayName: carlcs
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T22:54:40.923Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-12-09T22:54:40.923Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Brandon Kelly
Answers.Body: <blockquote>
    <p>If something about the layout changes I don't want to have to go through multiple Entry Types to make the changes over and over.</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>Suspend judgement about whatever you think you know about Entry Types for a minute.</p>
  
  <p>Unlike other CMS like WordPress where a page template typically defines a layout, <a href="https://craftcms.com/docs/sections-and-entries#entry-types" rel="nofollow">Entry Types</a> in Craft are a lot more flexible (because you can also use a different set of custom fields for each type). </p>
  
  <p>More importantly, in your case, there's no relationship between the <code>template</code> you might use for that particular entry type, unless you <a href="https://craftcms.com/help/entry-type-templates" rel="nofollow">want there to be</a>.  Twig is awesome in helping to ensure your code is DRY.</p>
  
  <p>You can absolutely reuse Entry Types in different sections. There's nothing stopping you setting up an Entry Type in one section and using the same name in another. It's up to your on what template you want to load; in that case, just borrow the same Twig code.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T22:54:06.793Z
Answers.Text: What if my content structure changes and I need to add a field? I'd have to go into every single Entry Type for every unique Structure section and manually add the field over and over again. What's DRY about that?
Answers.UserDisplayName: kmgdev
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T22:59:43.383Z
Answers.Text: See [Brandon's answer](http://craftcms.stackexchange.com/a/12797/1016) to answer your question. I feel your pain on duping fields but in general if you find yourself having to keep remodeling your content structure, you probably have IA issues to begin with. Entry Types  and Sections are like rooms in a house, they should have a specific purpose. If you want to keep duplicating the same lamp in every room, that's going to be a pain no matter how you slice it.
Answers.UserDisplayName: RitterKnight
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T23:16:07.143Z
Answers.Text: "if you find yourself having to keep remodeling your content structure, you probably have IA issues to begin with" - Have you ever met your average client? Don't know about you, but I've had to add a field many times when a marketing department decides they want to add google tracking code or tags to entries.
Answers.UserDisplayName: kmgdev
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T23:21:45.477Z
Answers.Text: Yup, plenty of clients. I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill here.
Answers.UserDisplayName: RitterKnight
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T22:50:11.220Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-12-09T22:50:11.220Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: RitterKnight
Body: <p>My site has a set of different layout types with their own templates:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Brochure</li>
  <li>Listing</li>
  <li>Plain Text</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>And the site has a group of hierarchical pages that each use a different layout:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>About (Brochure Layout)
  
  <ul>
  <li>Employees (Listing Layout)</li>
  <li>History (Plain Text Layout)</li>
  </ul></li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>So I've got these 3 pages each with different content and layout requirements that all need to be grouped together under the "About" page. But I can only use one Section type per Structure.</p>
  
  <p>I don't want to use Entry Types, because I need to use the layouts in multiple places on the site. For example there's a Brochure-type page in the site's 'Careers' area. If something about the layout changes I don't want to have to go through multiple Entry Types to make the changes over and over.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T22:24:11.370Z
Comments.Text: The best & easiest solution, IMO, would be to make it possible to save Entry Types for re-use in different Sections. That way you only have to edit one Entry Type if a layout pattern changes.
Comments.UserDisplayName: kmgdev
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T22:47:24.063Z
Comments.Text: Just found [this feature request](http://feedback.buildwithcraft.com/forums/285221-feature-requests/suggestions/7201112-make-entry-types-more-flexible), and Brandon makes a good point about problems raised when tweaking on a per-section basis. Ultimately I think the Structures model is too restrictive and needs to be re-evaluated. Rather than a Section type, the Entries area should be reworked with a separate Navigation model. As an example, I think the way the Structure module for ExpressionEngine handles page hierarchy is very flexible and user-friendly.
Comments.UserDisplayName: kmgdev
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-12-09T22:49:43.430Z
Comments.Text: This doesn't directly answer your question, but, I believe, you might be able to partially work around the limitation you're bumping into with some schmancy twig / template organization. 
  
  Give this presentation a look:
  https://speakerdeck.com/acolangelo/template-organization-in-craft
Comments.UserDisplayName: Brett Burwell
Tags: <structure><navigation><sections>
Title: Multiple Sections Within a Structure Group?
ThreadText: # Multiple Sections Within a Structure Group?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2015-12-09)
  
  My site has a set of different layout types with their own templates:
  
  * Brochure
  * Listing
  * Plain Text
  
  And the site has a group of hierarchical pages that each use a different layout:
  
  * About (Brochure Layout)
    + Employees (Listing Layout)
    + History (Plain Text Layout)
  
  So I've got these 3 pages each with different content and layout requirements that all need to be grouped together under the "About" page. But I can only use one Section type per Structure.
  
  I don't want to use Entry Types, because I need to use the layouts in multiple places on the site. For example there's a Brochure-type page in the site's 'Careers' area. If something about the layout changes I don't want to have to go through multiple Entry Types to make the changes over and over.
  
  **Tags:** structure, navigation, sections
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: The best & easiest solution, IMO, would be to make it possible to save Entry Types for re-use in different Sections. That way you only have to edit one Entry Type if a layout pattern changes.  
  > **username_0**: Just found [this feature request](http://feedback.buildwithcraft.com/forums/285221-feature-requests/suggestions/7201112-make-entry-types-more-flexible), and username_2 makes a good point about problems raised when tweaking on a per-section basis. Ultimately I think the Structures model is too restrictive and needs to be re-evaluated. Rather than a Section type, the Entries area should be reworked with a separate Navigation model. As an example, I think the way the Structure module for ExpressionEngine handles page hierarchy is very flexible and user-friendly.  
  > **username_1**: This doesn't directly answer your question, but, I believe, you might be able to partially work around the limitation you're bumping into with some schmancy twig / template organization.   Give this presentation a look: https://speakerdeck.com/acolangelo/template-organization-in-craft  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2015-12-09. Score: 3 | Accepted answer
  
  First, try to separate the concepts of *content modeling* (how things are set up in the CP) and *information architecture* (how things are going to be presented to the user on the front-end site) in your mind. Are these “Employees” and “History” pages inherently sub-content of “About”, or is that just how you’re choosing to display it on the front-end? My hunch is it’s the latter, in which case a Structure section is not the right choice to begin with - and perhaps 3 separate Single sections makes more sense.
  
  > I don't want to use Entry Types, because I need to use the layouts in multiple places on the site. For example there's a Brochure-type page in the site's 'Careers' area. If something about the layout changes I don't want to have to go through multiple Entry Types to make the changes over and over.
  
  I feel you on the annoyance for having to maintain multiple (near-)identical field layouts, and this is something we hope to make better someday, but I would argue that it’s not going to be as bad in practice to keep these field groups in sync as you’re fearing – or at least not bad enough that the currently-possible workarounds will be worth the effort.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Fair point, and you're right, I was thinking of Structures as an IA solution and not a content model solution. I assumed that the Structure type was Craft's _navigation_ solution, but it looks like Craft doesn't yet have a comprehensive navigation model.  
  > **username_2**: @kgrote Right. There are one or two plugins that help with navigation, but currently Craft doesn’t have any built-in IA modeling features.  
  > **username_0**: Browsing the StackEx boards, it does seem like I'm not the only one who had that assumption, especially with the `{% nav %}` tag being associated with Structure-type entries. I think people are seeing the word "nav" and assuming that's Craft's navigation model and it's somehow tied to Structures.  
  > **username_3**: @kgrote there's many Craft users that use a structure named "Pages" with different Entry Types instead of singles. I think it's a great starting point for the site nav and as Entry Types are reusable you don't have to set up a Field Layout, paths and everything for every single page.  
  > **username_3**: @kgrote I think this feature would make editing field layouts a lot better: http://feedback.buildwithcraft.com/forums/285221-feature-requests/suggestions/7260336-default-field-order ! Update the field group and just drag it into each Entry Type you use it unmodified to update its fields.  
  > **username_3**: I just noticed there's actually two feature requests: http://feedback.buildwithcraft.com/forums/285221-feature-requests/suggestions/9902232-save-custom-order-of-fields-in-a-field-group  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2015-12-09. Score: 2
  
  > If something about the layout changes I don't want to have to go through multiple Entry Types to make the changes over and over.
  
  Suspend judgement about whatever you think you know about Entry Types for a minute.
  
  Unlike other CMS like WordPress where a page template typically defines a layout, [Entry Types](https://craftcms.com/docs/sections-and-entries#entry-types) in Craft are a lot more flexible (because you can also use a different set of custom fields for each type).
  
  More importantly, in your case, there's no relationship between the `template` you might use for that particular entry type, unless you [want there to be](https://craftcms.com/help/entry-type-templates). Twig is awesome in helping to ensure your code is DRY.
  
  You can absolutely reuse Entry Types in different sections. There's nothing stopping you setting up an Entry Type in one section and using the same name in another. It's up to your on what template you want to load; in that case, just borrow the same Twig code.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: What if my content structure changes and I need to add a field? I'd have to go into every single Entry Type for every unique Structure section and manually add the field over and over again. What's DRY about that?  
  > **username_4**: See [username_2's answer](http://craftcms.stackexchange.com/a/12797/1016) to answer your question. I feel your pain on duping fields but in general if you find yourself having to keep remodeling your content structure, you probably have IA issues to begin with. Entry Types  and Sections are like rooms in a house, they should have a specific purpose. If you want to keep duplicating the same lamp in every room, that's going to be a pain no matter how you slice it.  
  > **username_0**: "if you find yourself having to keep remodeling your content structure, you probably have IA issues to begin with" - Have you ever met your average client? Don't know about you, but I've had to add a field many times when a marketing department decides they want to add google tracking code or tags to entries.  
  > **username_4**: Yup, plenty of clients. I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill here.  
  
  ---
  
  