Answers.Body: <p>No, having a field and a category group (or a section and a user group etc) share handles isn't dangerous at all.</p>
  
  <p>Being specific and semantic with handles in general can be a huge boon for keeping things easily memorable and templates and other source code readable, though – so for example you might want to have handles like <code>genre</code> (for the category group) and <code>selectedGenres</code> (for the categories field), instead of both using <code>genre</code>. Though technically, both can be named <code>genre</code>, no worries.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-08-07T16:00:05.817Z
Answers.Text: A thank you for a nice and clear answer from the grateful user of your Reasons plugin!
Answers.UserDisplayName: certainlyakey
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-08-07T13:31:26.220Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-08-07T13:31:26.220Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Mats Mikkel Rummelhoff
Body: <p>I'm currently setting up a site. One routine operation there is to 1) create a category group and 2) create a 'Categories' field for it to attach to a section later. </p>
  
  <p>Now for safety's sake I'm giving different handle names to the category group and the related field. For example, a category group has a handle called <code>genre</code> and the field — <code>genre_field</code>, just to ensure that no clashes between them would happen. </p>
  
  <p>But is it actually a possible situation that handles of two different entities (here, fields and cat/groups, but it could be sections and fields as well and so on) could conflict? </p>
  
Tags: <field><category>
Title: Could different entities have the same handle?
ThreadText: # Could different entities have the same handle?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2016-08-07)
  
  I'm currently setting up a site. One routine operation there is to 1) create a category group and 2) create a 'Categories' field for it to attach to a section later.
  
  Now for safety's sake I'm giving different handle names to the category group and the related field. For example, a category group has a handle called `genre` and the field — `genre_field`, just to ensure that no clashes between them would happen.
  
  But is it actually a possible situation that handles of two different entities (here, fields and cat/groups, but it could be sections and fields as well and so on) could conflict?
  
  **Tags:** field, category
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2016-08-07. Score: 2 | Accepted answer
  
  No, having a field and a category group (or a section and a user group etc) share handles isn't dangerous at all.
  
  Being specific and semantic with handles in general can be a huge boon for keeping things easily memorable and templates and other source code readable, though – so for example you might want to have handles like `genre` (for the category group) and `selectedGenres` (for the categories field), instead of both using `genre`. Though technically, both can be named `genre`, no worries.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: A thank you for a nice and clear answer from the grateful user of your Reasons plugin!  
  
  ---
  
  