<p>As explained in my comment, the difference in output value is because of a different relay fee for these transactions.</p>
<p>I don't however understand why these transactions would have a different relay fee value. It might be an oversight.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-10-12T13:49:36.880Z
2023-10-12T13:49:36.880Z
Steven Roose
<p>According to <a href="https://www.arkpill.me/deep-dive" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.arkpill.me/deep-dive</a>, the value added to X is 240 sats when dealing with 1, 10 or 100 sats coins, but 280 sats when dealing with &gt;100 sats coins.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/LaDS3.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/LaDS3.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-10-10T16:59:52.947Z
The difference seems to have gone to the relay fee, but I don't understand myself why there would have to be a difference in relay fee, the txs seem identical in size.
Steven Roose
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-10-11T08:38:06.060Z
Exactly. And to be honest, I don't know if 450 - 280 = 170 or if 450 - 170 = 280, the documentation is not clear.
bordalix
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-10-11T15:21:46.007Z
Hi @StevenRoose, your comment looks like an answer to me (even though it’s short). Please don’t answer the question in comments, but make an answer post instead when you are answering the question. :)
Murch
<ark>
Why the difference in sats on Collaborative Connector Closures?
bordalix
# Why the difference in sats on Collaborative Connector Closures?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2023-10-09)

According to <https://www.arkpill.me/deep-dive>, the value added to X is 240 sats when dealing with 1, 10 or 100 sats coins, but 280 sats when dealing with >100 sats coins.

Why?

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/LaDS3.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/LaDS3.png)

**Tags:** ark

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The difference seems to have gone to the relay fee, but I don't understand myself why there would have to be a difference in relay fee, the txs seem identical in size.  
> **username_0**: Exactly. And to be honest, I don't know if 450 - 280 = 170 or if 450 - 170 = 280, the documentation is not clear.  
> **username_2**: Hi @StevenRoose, your comment looks like an answer to me (even though it’s short). Please don’t answer the question in comments, but make an answer post instead when you are answering the question. :)  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2023-10-12. Score: 1

As explained in my comment, the difference in output value is because of a different relay fee for these transactions.

I don't however understand why these transactions would have a different relay fee value. It might be an oversight.


---

