<p>just some ideas:</p>

<h2>Strategies could be attacking the trust structure of bitcoin:</h2>

<ul>
<li>Buying large quantities of bitcoins and dropping them on the market causes it value to fluctuate and make it appear weak  </li>
<li>hacking peer sites (like mtgox), or bitcoin users directly (via trojans, etc.) leaves insecurities on where to use it  </li>
<li>influencing media to emphasize about the dangers of bitcoin (selling drugs, weapons, etc.) will make it less accepted in society by creating fear</li>
<li>creating various alternative currencies, flooding a lot of misleading information, to weaken the marketing of bitcoin by confusion and information overflow</li>
</ul>

<h2>Could be attacking the technical side:</h2>

<ul>
<li>Creating big amounts of powerful ASICS and use them for false verifications</li>
<li>stuffing the blockchain with spam information and useless transaction, making it to big to handle</li>
<li>Blocking and filtering traffic from bitcoin clients, will make it necessary to use TOR (which could be also blocked in certain ways) and will render bitcoin unusable for the average person  </li>
<li>Switching of the internet</li>
<li>Brute Force attacks on the network to render it slow and unusable  </li>
</ul>

<h2>Could be attacking it by legal means:</h2>

<ul>
<li>Making it illegal to use bitcoin, and tracking users via ISPs, a few show trials and people won't want to use bitcoin again (so TOR could be again an option to circumvent)</li>
<li>shutting down and making peer sites illegal (if they are not already, e.g. mtgox, silkroad)</li>
</ul>

<p>Great leverage for Bitcoin will eventually come by using it via smartphones and alike, bringing the currency to the street markets. If they find a way to block these trades, they will also hurt bitcoin a lot.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-02-02T21:36:31.853Z
2013-10-12T16:59:23.550Z
2013-10-12T16:59:23.550Z
mklarmann
<p>In the U.S. FinCEN changed the term used for prepaid cards from "stored value" to "prepaid access" and refers to "electronic codes" as being one of the types of "prepaid access".  Additionally, they have widened the scope of what a money service business is, and that new scope includes those that serve U.S. customers online even without having any presence in the U.S.</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.bitcoinmoney.com/post/11074108719" rel="nofollow">http://www.bitcoinmoney.com/post/11074108719</a></li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-01-31T02:13:14.357Z
2013-01-31T02:13:14.357Z
Stephen Gornick
<p>With the recent increase in articles about the threat of Bitcoin vs central banks, government and other authorities over the money supply, I am wondering how well authorities are prepared and actively dealing with the situation. </p>

<p>Yes, most are probably aware of it by now. There have been some official statements by several agencies. Most notable I could find are the <a href="http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/virtualcurrencyschemes201210en.pdf" rel="nofollow">ECB: Virtual Currency Schemes</a> (PDF, European Central Bank - October 2012), <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/08/us-financial-bitcoins-idUSTRE7573T320110608" rel="nofollow">U.S. Senators seek crackdown on "Bitcoin" currency</a> (Reuters, June 2011) and <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/05/fbi-fears-bitcoin/" rel="nofollow">FBI Fears Bitcoin’s Popularity with Criminals</a> (Wired, May 2012)</p>

<p>Is there any proof that serious plans are in the works to 'crackdown on Bitcoin' - either directly by creating laws or indirectly by influence on the market?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-01-30T19:41:39.017Z
AFAIK, no: they are aware, and aren't acting.
o0'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-02-03T14:54:45.417Z
As total net worth of Bitcoin is around $200 million, it is not a threat yet.
vi.su.
<banks><weaknesses><politics><ecb>
Strategies against Bitcoin
mahler
# Strategies against Bitcoin

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-01-30)

With the recent increase in articles about the threat of Bitcoin vs central banks, government and other authorities over the money supply, I am wondering how well authorities are prepared and actively dealing with the situation.

Yes, most are probably aware of it by now. There have been some official statements by several agencies. Most notable I could find are the [ECB: Virtual Currency Schemes](http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/virtualcurrencyschemes201210en.pdf) (PDF, European Central Bank - October 2012), [U.S. Senators seek crackdown on "Bitcoin" currency](http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/08/us-financial-bitcoins-idUSTRE7573T320110608) (Reuters, June 2011) and [FBI Fears Bitcoin’s Popularity with Criminals](http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/05/fbi-fears-bitcoin/) (Wired, May 2012)

Is there any proof that serious plans are in the works to 'crackdown on Bitcoin' - either directly by creating laws or indirectly by influence on the market?

**Tags:** banks, weaknesses, politics, ecb

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: AFAIK, no: they are aware, and aren't acting.  
> **username_2**: As total net worth of Bitcoin is around $200 million, it is not a threat yet.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2013-02-02. Score: 3

just some ideas:

## Strategies could be attacking the trust structure of bitcoin:

* Buying large quantities of bitcoins and dropping them on the market causes it value to fluctuate and make it appear weak
* hacking peer sites (like mtgox), or bitcoin users directly (via trojans, etc.) leaves insecurities on where to use it
* influencing media to emphasize about the dangers of bitcoin (selling drugs, weapons, etc.) will make it less accepted in society by creating fear
* creating various alternative currencies, flooding a lot of misleading information, to weaken the marketing of bitcoin by confusion and information overflow

## Could be attacking the technical side:

* Creating big amounts of powerful ASICS and use them for false verifications
* stuffing the blockchain with spam information and useless transaction, making it to big to handle
* Blocking and filtering traffic from bitcoin clients, will make it necessary to use TOR (which could be also blocked in certain ways) and will render bitcoin unusable for the average person
* Switching of the internet
* Brute Force attacks on the network to render it slow and unusable

## Could be attacking it by legal means:

* Making it illegal to use bitcoin, and tracking users via ISPs, a few show trials and people won't want to use bitcoin again (so TOR could be again an option to circumvent)
* shutting down and making peer sites illegal (if they are not already, e.g. mtgox, silkroad)

Great leverage for Bitcoin will eventually come by using it via smartphones and alike, bringing the currency to the street markets. If they find a way to block these trades, they will also hurt bitcoin a lot.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2013-01-31. Score: 1

In the U.S. FinCEN changed the term used for prepaid cards from "stored value" to "prepaid access" and refers to "electronic codes" as being one of the types of "prepaid access". Additionally, they have widened the scope of what a money service business is, and that new scope includes those that serve U.S. customers online even without having any presence in the U.S.

* <http://www.bitcoinmoney.com/post/11074108719>


---

