<p>There are no such thresholds. All types of IP addresses are treated equally.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-08-30T15:42:02.830Z
Just so there is no ambiguity, you mean all types of **addresses**?
Vinay Shetty
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-08-30T16:41:00.370Z
Sorry, yes, I try to avoid the term "address" as it can be confused with Bitcoin addresses. But I mean IP, onion, I2P, CJDNS addresses are all treated equally.
Pieter Wuille
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-08-30T14:22:17.370Z
2022-08-30T14:22:17.370Z
Pieter Wuille
<p>From my understanding, the new tables have 1024 buckets and each bucket can hold a maximum of 64 addresses. Is there a limit set in place for the maximum number of address types that can be part of the 64 addresses? For example, a threshold of 30 .onion addresses of the maximum 64 addresses.</p>

<bitcoin-core><client><bitcoin-core-development><tor>
IP and .onion addresses in buckets
Vinay Shetty
# IP and .onion addresses in buckets

(Asked by: username_0 on 2022-08-29)

From my understanding, the new tables have 1024 buckets and each bucket can hold a maximum of 64 addresses. Is there a limit set in place for the maximum number of address types that can be part of the 64 addresses? For example, a threshold of 30 .onion addresses of the maximum 64 addresses.

**Tags:** bitcoin-core, client, bitcoin-core-development, tor


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2022-08-30. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

There are no such thresholds. All types of IP addresses are treated equally.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Just so there is no ambiguity, you mean all types of **addresses**?  
> **username_1**: Sorry, yes, I try to avoid the term "address" as it can be confused with Bitcoin addresses. But I mean IP, onion, I2P, CJDNS addresses are all treated equally.  

---

