<p>The wiki article you describe has been updated since by a skilled developer who is part of the Bitcoin team and the key change now reads:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Bitcoin does not currently implement block discouraging in any form.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>So this appears to be a concept that has not been implemented by any clients.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-07-21T17:52:01.110Z
2013-07-21T17:52:01.110Z
Stephen Gornick
<p>As of the time I write this, only one <a href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Discouraged_block" rel="nofollow">block type is marked as "discouraged"</a>, and I'd like to understand why this exists.</p>

<ul>
<li>Is a correct reading that is that "it <strong>should</strong> be in the blockchain?</li>
<li>Is this simply the block number embedded in the transaction?</li>
<li>Are there any sample blocks that do or don't have this information?</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-07T00:06:43.833Z
The link states this: At the moment, the only "new rule" for which disobedience is being discouraged is the "put the block height in the coinbase" rule.
The way I read it, there is a rule "put the block height in the coinbase" and *disobedience* is discouraged. That would mean the opposite of what you state in the question title, which would mean that the block height is encouraged to be in the coin base. Disclaimer: I know little about this topic, but that's how I read it...
Highly Irregular
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-07T01:14:55.983Z
@HighlyIrregular I edited the question, I see that your interpretation may be spot on.  Now that my thinking isn't inverted, it makes sense, though I wonder how / why unnumbered blocks would ever work.  Was it a v0.01 bug?
makerofthings7
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-13T01:31:16.263Z
See also http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/2952/who-obeys-discouraged-blocks
ripper234
<blockchain><development>
What are "discouraged blocks" in the blockchain? (examples and explanation please)
makerofthings7
# What are "discouraged blocks" in the blockchain? (examples and explanation please)

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-12-06)

As of the time I write this, only one [block type is marked as "discouraged"](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Discouraged_block), and I'd like to understand why this exists.

* Is a correct reading that is that "it **should** be in the blockchain?
* Is this simply the block number embedded in the transaction?
* Are there any sample blocks that do or don't have this information?

**Tags:** blockchain, development

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The link states this: At the moment, the only "new rule" for which disobedience is being discouraged is the "put the block height in the coinbase" rule. The way I read it, there is a rule "put the block height in the coinbase" and *disobedience* is discouraged. That would mean the opposite of what you state in the question title, which would mean that the block height is encouraged to be in the coin base. Disclaimer: I know little about this topic, but that's how I read it...  
> **username_0**: @HighlyIrregular I edited the question, I see that your interpretation may be spot on.  Now that my thinking isn't inverted, it makes sense, though I wonder how / why unnumbered blocks would ever work.  Was it a v0.01 bug?  
> **username_2**: See also http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/2952/who-obeys-discouraged-blocks  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2013-07-21. Score: 1

The wiki article you describe has been updated since by a skilled developer who is part of the Bitcoin team and the key change now reads:

> Bitcoin does not currently implement block discouraging in any form.

So this appears to be a concept that has not been implemented by any clients.


---

