<p>You can't find out whether 2 blocks have been mined by the same entity (e.g. person) for sure. Guessing is possible. If you go to <a href="http://blockchain.info" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://blockchain.info</a>, you'll see a "Relayed By" column in the table right on the start page. You can be reasonably sure that that mining pool mined the block. Some mining pools always send their money to the same address. In that case, you can be even more sure that all the blocks whose coinbase transaction went to that address have been mined by the same entity because else they'd be giving a lot of money to a different entity.</p>

<p>The proof that a transaction has been incorporated into the blockchain is that there is a valid blockchain which contains a block which contains that transaction. You can't simply take a blockchain and swap a transaction in it out for a different one because that'd make the blockchain invalid as the hashes wouldn't check out.</p>

<p>Furthermore, if you want to be entirely certain that the transaction isn't just in any blockchain but also in the longest one, you need to be connected to the Bitcoin network so you know the longest blockchain. The longest one is the one which counts.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-23T18:10:11.267Z
2017-02-23T18:10:11.267Z
UTF-8
<p>1) No<br>
2) He chooses which transactions to accept.<br>
3) His block contains the transaction.<br>
<br>
If miner M was able to generate a block that belongs to the current blockchain (longest chain) and this block contains T1, then T1 and all other transactions in this block will continue on the blockchain, as long as this block does not become orphan. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-24T02:53:20.477Z
3) So if, say, miner M has a transaction T1 in its block, and there's a block mined by N after M's block, you're saying that whatever transactions M has accepted (like from N) would appear in T1?
JustAnotherUser
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-24T03:10:42.280Z
If miner M was able to generate a block that belongs to the current blockchain (longest chain) and this block contains T1, then T1 and all other transactions in this block will continue on the blockchain, as long as this block does not become orphan.
Leandro
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-26T19:46:18.653Z
@Leandro: Please edit your answer to include the relevant information in the post instead of adding information to comments. Comments are only supposed to be used for transient information and may be removed later.
Murch
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-23T22:52:39.383Z
2017-03-01T22:47:05.413Z
2017-03-01T22:47:05.413Z
Leandro
<p>So I've been recently studying about Bitcoin and had few questions:</p>

<p>1) What distinguishes a miner from another miner? Is there any proof that two miners are not the same person?</p>

<p>2) What can we say are the transactions accepted by a miner? Is it all transactions in the blocks after itself, that have been added to the miner's blockchain branch?</p>

<p>3) In any case, what's the proof that a transaction has been accepted by any miner?</p>

<p>Thanks!</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-23T18:07:05.150Z
Please try to write your second question more clearly.
UTF-8
<transactions><blockchain><identity>
What distinguishes a miner from another?
JustAnotherUser
# What distinguishes a miner from another?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-02-23)

So I've been recently studying about Bitcoin and had few questions:

1) What distinguishes a miner from another miner? Is there any proof that two miners are not the same person?

2) What can we say are the transactions accepted by a miner? Is it all transactions in the blocks after itself, that have been added to the miner's blockchain branch?

3) In any case, what's the proof that a transaction has been accepted by any miner?

Thanks!

**Tags:** transactions, blockchain, identity

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Please try to write your second question more clearly.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-02-23. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

You can't find out whether 2 blocks have been mined by the same entity (e.g. person) for sure. Guessing is possible. If you go to <http://blockchain.info>, you'll see a "Relayed By" column in the table right on the start page. You can be reasonably sure that that mining pool mined the block. Some mining pools always send their money to the same address. In that case, you can be even more sure that all the blocks whose coinbase transaction went to that address have been mined by the same entity because else they'd be giving a lot of money to a different entity.

The proof that a transaction has been incorporated into the blockchain is that there is a valid blockchain which contains a block which contains that transaction. You can't simply take a blockchain and swap a transaction in it out for a different one because that'd make the blockchain invalid as the hashes wouldn't check out.

Furthermore, if you want to be entirely certain that the transaction isn't just in any blockchain but also in the longest one, you need to be connected to the Bitcoin network so you know the longest blockchain. The longest one is the one which counts.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-02-23. Score: 0

1) No  
2) He chooses which transactions to accept.  
3) His block contains the transaction.  
  
If miner M was able to generate a block that belongs to the current blockchain (longest chain) and this block contains T1, then T1 and all other transactions in this block will continue on the blockchain, as long as this block does not become orphan.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: 3) So if, say, miner M has a transaction T1 in its block, and there's a block mined by N after M's block, you're saying that whatever transactions M has accepted (like from N) would appear in T1?  
> **username_2**: If miner M was able to generate a block that belongs to the current blockchain (longest chain) and this block contains T1, then T1 and all other transactions in this block will continue on the blockchain, as long as this block does not become orphan.  
> **username_3**: @username_2: Please edit your answer to include the relevant information in the post instead of adding information to comments. Comments are only supposed to be used for transient information and may be removed later.  

---

