<p>By 2140, the <strong>final</strong> bitcoins will be made. After 2140, no more bitcoins will be made, which means it's only trading and buying things wiith bitcoins.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-06-05T11:41:55.657Z
True, but you should really mention transaction fees.
o0'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-06-02T14:46:10.330Z
2013-06-02T14:46:10.330Z
Aran
<p>No, from <a href="https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/38998">here</a> (or the <a href="https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/blocks?s=reward(asc)#" rel="nofollow noreferrer">blocks at the top of this up-to-date list</a>):</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><p>Block 501726 had no transaction outputs (except a 0-value commitment), losing the entire 12.5 BTC subsidy.</p>
</li>
<li><p>Block 526591 didn't claim half of the block reward, losing 6.25 BTC.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>21 million - 18.75 = 20,999,981.25 BTC will have been mined</p>
<p>EDIT: As Raghav Sood descriped, 100 BTC was left unclaimable due to same coinbase hashes. (but pedantically, even though their outputs can't be claimed, they were mined)</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-18T12:13:38.640Z
This is a partial list, there are some other similar losses as well - for instance, blocks 106662 and 106692, and blocks 106572 and 106730 created identical coinbase outputs, effectively destroying two blocks worth of rewards.
Raghav Sood
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-18T11:41:33.810Z
2020-04-19T10:43:15.977Z
2020-06-16T11:10:03.350Z
MCCCS
<p>Theoretically yes, but that moment is so far in the future it is likely that some other events such as new currency technology will surpass bitcoins.</p>

<p>However, mining will not stop.  Mining is the security backbone of bitcoin, and it will continue because it will still be profitable to mine.  Miners will be paid fees from existing bitcoins with every transaction instead of a reward of newly created bitcoins.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-03-28T01:41:38.043Z
[Market-based transaction fees don't scale](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/8779/how-can-market-based-transaction-fees-scale). I read that even Gavin has expressed his doubt that they will.
Shelby Moore III
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-06-05T11:41:25.483Z
How can such a FUD have 9 upvotes, wtf?
o0'.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-09-02T09:43:59.477Z
I find it hard to concieve that mining will be profitable far in the future. To have a significantly large enough of user base and the value to be high enough to make mining worthwhile. By 2030 I guess the number of people using bitcoins would have to be around 50 x what it is now and value would have to be over 4 x what it is now,  (estimated from current rates and difficulty, this math may be way off lol). lets hope this is the case.
MaxSan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-10-14T13:04:08.380Z
@MaxSan Hashing can be profitable at any user & transaction volume level.  At CURRENT difficulty/price/fee% you would need transaction volume to be 200x current level for mining to be profitable.  If fees relative to transactions rose to say 0.5% it would only need to be about 20x current level.  Of course difficulty can fall or price rise.  There are infinite combinations of those three cariables which allow profitability.  Example: price/difficulty rises 5x fold, transaction volume rises 10x with fees 0.5 of transactions would results in total fees roughly equal to current block reward.
DeathAndTaxes
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-31T18:44:22.790Z
once transaction fees become usual and the major part of a miner's reward, the process should really be renamed into "auditing" or the like.
herzmeister
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-08-30T22:49:15.987Z
2011-08-30T22:49:15.987Z
Joshua Kolden
<p>It is written that the supply of Bitcoin units is limited to 21 million and that this limit will approximately have been reached around the year 2030.</p>

<p>But is there an actual "last Bitcoin" (or "last Satoshi" for that matter) that will have been mined one day? Or will mining continue forever after producing smaller and smaller fractions?</p>

<money-supply><reward-schedule>
Will all 21 million units be completely mined one day?
herzmeister
# Will all 21 million units be completely mined one day?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2011-08-30)

It is written that the supply of Bitcoin units is limited to 21 million and that this limit will approximately have been reached around the year 2030.

But is there an actual "last Bitcoin" (or "last Satoshi" for that matter) that will have been mined one day? Or will mining continue forever after producing smaller and smaller fractions?

**Tags:** money-supply, reward-schedule


---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2011-08-30. Score: 15 | Accepted answer

Theoretically yes, but that moment is so far in the future it is likely that some other events such as new currency technology will surpass bitcoins.

However, mining will not stop. Mining is the security backbone of bitcoin, and it will continue because it will still be profitable to mine. Miners will be paid fees from existing bitcoins with every transaction instead of a reward of newly created bitcoins.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: once transaction fees become usual and the major part of a miner's reward, the process should really be renamed into "auditing" or the like.  
> **username_7**: I find it hard to concieve that mining will be profitable far in the future. To have a significantly large enough of user base and the value to be high enough to make mining worthwhile. By 2030 I guess the number of people using bitcoins would have to be around 50 x what it is now and value would have to be over 4 x what it is now,  (estimated from current rates and difficulty, this math may be way off lol). lets hope this is the case.  
> **username_8**: @username_7 Hashing can be profitable at any user & transaction volume level.  At CURRENT difficulty/price/fee% you would need transaction volume to be 200x current level for mining to be profitable.  If fees relative to transactions rose to say 0.5% it would only need to be about 20x current level.  Of course difficulty can fall or price rise.  There are infinite combinations of those three cariables which allow profitability.  Example: price/difficulty rises 5x fold, transaction volume rises 10x with fees 0.5 of transactions would results in total fees roughly equal to current block reward.  
> **username_6**: [Market-based transaction fees don't scale](http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/8779/how-can-market-based-transaction-fees-scale). I read that even Gavin has expressed his doubt that they will.  
> **username_2**: How can such a FUD have 9 upvotes, wtf?  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2013-06-02. Score: 2

By 2140, the **final** bitcoins will be made. After 2140, no more bitcoins will be made, which means it's only trading and buying things wiith bitcoins.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: True, but you should really mention transaction fees.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-04-18. Score: 0

No, from [here](https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/38998) (or the [blocks at the top of this up-to-date list](https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/blocks?s=reward(asc)#)):

> * Block 501726 had no transaction outputs (except a 0-value commitment), losing the entire 12.5 BTC subsidy.
> * Block 526591 didn't claim half of the block reward, losing 6.25 BTC.

21 million - 18.75 = 20,999,981.25 BTC will have been mined

EDIT: As username_4 descriped, 100 BTC was left unclaimable due to same coinbase hashes. (but pedantically, even though their outputs can't be claimed, they were mined)

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: This is a partial list, there are some other similar losses as well - for instance, blocks 106662 and 106692, and blocks 106572 and 106730 created identical coinbase outputs, effectively destroying two blocks worth of rewards.  

---

