<blockquote>
  <p>Case I: If the BIP-148 block chain is longer than the Legacy block chain?
  (My understanding is, this won't even happen. Because if the BIP-148 network hash rate gets higher than that of the Legacy network, the Legacy block chain will always be "in sync" with the BIP-148 block chain, and the two block chains will be exactly the same. Am I correct?)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>That is correct. In this case, there is only one blockchain and that is the BIP 148 chain. Since the BIP 148 chain is valid under the non BIP 148 rules, if it is longer, it will be the accepted blockchain.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Case II: If the Legacy block chain is longer than the BIP-148 block chain?
  (Now, after Nov 15th, the BIP-148 nodes start accepting all the blocks. The next solved block will most probably be a Legacy block. So, will the BIP-148 nodes switch to the "longer chain" [which is the Legacy chain], and discard all the blocks since the fork happened?)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>No. BIP 148 nodes will continue to follow their own chain and not switch to the legacy chain. This is because blocks between August 1st and November 15th in the legacy chain do not follow the BIP 148 consensus rules. Those rules specify that all blocks between August 1st and November 15th must signal for segwit.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-14T08:45:01.950Z
Okay, a follow-up question: How could we "lose" coins, then? I have heard people talking about how you could lose coins after the situation resolves. If what you say is true, then it seems like no transactions will ever be reverted.
John Red
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-14T08:51:20.163Z
Suppose the non BIP 148 chain is longer but is also losing hash rate to the BIP 148 chain. Eventually the BIP 148 chain will become longer and overtake the non BIP 148 chain to cause Case 1. However this means that any transactions made on the non BIP 148 chain that are not confirmed on the BIP 148 chain or are invalid on the BIP 148 chain suddenly disappear. This can lead to some people losing funds because what they received on the non BIP 148 chain does not exist on the BIP 148 chain.
Ava Chow
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-14T06:03:25.073Z
2017-06-14T06:03:25.073Z
Ava Chow
<p>The time duration for the BIP-148 UASF is from August 1st to November 15th. During this time, the BIP-148 nodes will reject blocks that do not signal for Segwit.</p>

<p>Now, after Nov. 15th, even the BIP-148 nodes would start accepting all the blocks, whether they signal for Segwit or not. So, just after Nov. 15th, what would happen:</p>

<p>Case I: If the BIP-148 block chain is longer than the Legacy block chain?<br>
(My understanding is, this won't even happen. Because if the BIP-148 network hash rate gets higher than that of the Legacy network, the Legacy block chain will always be "in sync" with the BIP-148 block chain, and the two block chains will be exactly the same. Am I correct?)</p>

<p>Case II: If the Legacy block chain is longer than the BIP-148 block chain?<br>
(Now, after Nov 15th, the BIP-148 nodes start accepting all the blocks. The next solved block will most probably be a Legacy block. So, will the BIP-148 nodes switch to the "longer chain" [which is the Legacy chain], and discard all the blocks since the fork happened?)</p>

<segregated-witness><bip148-uasf>
What will happen on November 15th 2017, when the Segwit proposal expires?
John Red
# What will happen on November 15th 2017, when the Segwit proposal expires?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-06-12)

The time duration for the BIP-148 UASF is from August 1st to November 15th. During this time, the BIP-148 nodes will reject blocks that do not signal for Segwit.

Now, after Nov. 15th, even the BIP-148 nodes would start accepting all the blocks, whether they signal for Segwit or not. So, just after Nov. 15th, what would happen:

Case I: If the BIP-148 block chain is longer than the Legacy block chain?  
(My understanding is, this won't even happen. Because if the BIP-148 network hash rate gets higher than that of the Legacy network, the Legacy block chain will always be "in sync" with the BIP-148 block chain, and the two block chains will be exactly the same. Am I correct?)

Case II: If the Legacy block chain is longer than the BIP-148 block chain?  
(Now, after Nov 15th, the BIP-148 nodes start accepting all the blocks. The next solved block will most probably be a Legacy block. So, will the BIP-148 nodes switch to the "longer chain" [which is the Legacy chain], and discard all the blocks since the fork happened?)

**Tags:** segregated-witness, bip148-uasf


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-06-14. Score: 1

> Case I: If the BIP-148 block chain is longer than the Legacy block chain?
> (My understanding is, this won't even happen. Because if the BIP-148 network hash rate gets higher than that of the Legacy network, the Legacy block chain will always be "in sync" with the BIP-148 block chain, and the two block chains will be exactly the same. Am I correct?)

That is correct. In this case, there is only one blockchain and that is the BIP 148 chain. Since the BIP 148 chain is valid under the non BIP 148 rules, if it is longer, it will be the accepted blockchain.

> Case II: If the Legacy block chain is longer than the BIP-148 block chain?
> (Now, after Nov 15th, the BIP-148 nodes start accepting all the blocks. The next solved block will most probably be a Legacy block. So, will the BIP-148 nodes switch to the "longer chain" [which is the Legacy chain], and discard all the blocks since the fork happened?)

No. BIP 148 nodes will continue to follow their own chain and not switch to the legacy chain. This is because blocks between August 1st and November 15th in the legacy chain do not follow the BIP 148 consensus rules. Those rules specify that all blocks between August 1st and November 15th must signal for segwit.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Okay, a follow-up question: How could we "lose" coins, then? I have heard people talking about how you could lose coins after the situation resolves. If what you say is true, then it seems like no transactions will ever be reverted.  
> **username_1**: Suppose the non BIP 148 chain is longer but is also losing hash rate to the BIP 148 chain. Eventually the BIP 148 chain will become longer and overtake the non BIP 148 chain to cause Case 1. However this means that any transactions made on the non BIP 148 chain that are not confirmed on the BIP 148 chain or are invalid on the BIP 148 chain suddenly disappear. This can lead to some people losing funds because what they received on the non BIP 148 chain does not exist on the BIP 148 chain.  

---

