Answers.Body: <p>I would suggest looking into the black magic pocket cinema camera (bmpcc). This camera has a very wide dynamic range which gives you the possibility to record footage that you can color grade. This is an important part of film making. </p>
  
  <p>Also the bmpcc has a 16mm sensor, this will allow you to buy very reasonably priced and very "filmic" looking 16mm lenses from ebay (make sure to always check reviews of a certain type of lens, not all of them work).</p>
  
  <p>If it is for hobby films look into DIY shoulder rigs sliders cranes and lighting, they will look crappy but will work, pvc is your friend!</p>
  
  <p>For audio a zoom h1 will work (it is cheap and records nice stereo sound and clean mics via the input) h4n is the bigger better brother that allows you to record 4 channels instead of 2.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-10-21T13:41:44.583Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-10-21T13:41:44.583Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: guus
Answers.Body: <p>Zoom H4n is a pretty good unit for audio</p>
  
  <p>Clean up your recordings (if req'd) in Adobe Audition using the Noise Print feature and you can remove a lot of extraneous noise.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-31T15:21:34.200Z
Answers.Text: This is not really an answer to the question.  They are asking what equipment do they need for starting out making a professional quality film.  Just an audio recorder does not answer what equipment is needed (or answers it very, very poorly).
Answers.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-02-12T23:49:28.960Z
Answers.Text: Thanks for your feedback. A discussion on equipment might include reference to useful applications and a recommendation on a particular piece of hardware; in this case the Zoom H4n and Adobe Audition.
Answers.UserDisplayName: alexh
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-02-13T00:15:50.117Z
Answers.Text: True, and partial answers are ok, though with no further expansion as to why the H4n is a good choice this is still a rather low quality answer.  If you could expand on it some, that would help it be more useful, particularly since the h4n had already been mentioned.  Also, the noise print feature of Adobe Audition is more or less irrelevant to a question on equipment since it is software and a feature in software that would only be used if there were noise issues in the first place (which a professional quality project should seek to limit or eliminate to begin with.)
Answers.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-02-13T00:16:15.730Z
Answers.Text: I only comment because I think with a little more effort it could be a more valuable answer to the question than it currently is.
Answers.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-31T05:35:26.387Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-01-31T05:35:26.387Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: alexh
Answers.Body: <p>This depends on your budget. I'll assume you have an infinite budget and let you make decisions based on your actual budget.</p>
  
  <p>The first thing you want is a quality camcorder. Some people will recommend a DSLR, but those have issues with color accuracy in film. Get a quality camcorder and make sure it has an external microphone and headphone jack.  You may also want something with a hot seat if you want a light or mounted microphone.</p>
  
  <p>When it comes to audio, get a quality shotgun mic. They are very general purpose and work very well if you invest in quality one. The easiest way to record audio is through the microphone jack on the camcorder, but you can also use a separate audio reorder, but this means more work at editing. Some people will tell you to buy a clapboard, but just clapping has always worked fine for me.</p>
  
  <p>Editing is a very important part of the video production process (but remember that doesn't substitute for skill.). Most problems created by cheaper equipment can be fixed more cheaply in editing than by upgrading equipment.  My personal favorite programs are Adobe Premiere, which can be expensive, and Lightworks which is slightly less expensive. I've also heard good things about Final Cut and Sony Vegas.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-10-23T00:07:40.290Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-10-23T16:51:49.673Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2014-10-23T16:51:49.673Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: KC McLaughlin
Answers.Body: <p>Here is a list of equipments my film-making friends consider very useful.(I  own few of them). Budget is  $1800, excluding a good computer and post production software.</p>
  
  <ol>
  <li><p>A decent DSLR camera with kit lens. (eg: Canon t3i with 18-55mm lens - $500)</p></li>
  <li><p>Prime lens for great image quality and shallow depth of field (Canon 50mm f1.8 - $100). Great for shooting interviews and close shots. </p></li>
  <li><p>Wide angle lens to capture landscape and real estate (Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 - $500)</p></li>
  <li><p>A good audio recorder (Zoom h4n - $200)</p></li>
  <li><p>An image stabilisation device with a gimbal. These are extremely useful to get rid of shakes and obtain smooth, fluid video shots while moving your camera (Glidecam HD2000 is popular and costs $500).  A tripod is generally optional once you have this.</p></li>
  </ol>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-10-20T19:04:05.960Z
Answers.Text: Is there a reason you think a kit lens is worth it?  The image quality from them is considered to not be worth it by most.
Answers.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-10-20T16:43:17.493Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-10-20T16:50:57.680Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2014-10-20T16:50:57.680Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Thyag
Answers.Body: <p>For videography, the best bang for your buck is, hands down, going to be an entry level DSLR and a decent lens.  For audio, if your budget can allow for it, I suggest getting a stand alone multi-track recorder.  The Zoom H4n is a particularly popular model with videographers for its low price and decent (though not superb) audio quality.  (Update: The H5 and H6 are now available offering significant upgrades over the H4n, but also at a slightly higher price point.)</p>
  
  <p>There are far better options and values as you get more skill in the field, however for starting out, you probably don't want to invest too much until you get some experience under your belt.  It's easy to spend upwards of $10 to $15 grand on a nice videography setup as you get more and more professional, but a $1500-$1700 setup with something like a Canon T4i or Lumix G2 with a moderate level lens and an H4n or similar for recording audio (with some basic shotgun or lavaliere mics) is a decent start.</p>
  
  <p>Also, be sure not to skimp on a tripod.  You'll want a solid, sturdy tripod (probably aluminum) with a good fluid tripod head to make sure you can get steady shots.  Just a solid tripod alone can run you in to the $350 to $500 range.</p>
  
  <p>If you'll be shooting indoors, you may also need a light kit.  A cheap 3 point lighting kit can be had for a couple hundred dollars, though depending on what you intend to shoot, you may be able to get by without this initially.</p>
  
  <p>So overall breakdown I'd recommend starting out is around $500 to $600 on an entry level DSLR, $150 to $300 on a lens (if your DSLR body supports video auto focus, such as the Canon T4i, a stepper motor lens is needed), about $280 for an audio recorder, about $100 to $200 on mics, about $400 on a tripod and optionally about $150-$250 on lights.  Altogether, that's about $1600 or $1850 and you should be able to make some pretty solid professional looking stuff.  </p>
  
  <p>It does add up quickly, but the good news is that you can improve on the gear incrementally over time once you have the basics.  If you do have more than 2 grand to start out with, I'd spend a little bit extra on the lens or the camera body to get better low light performance and better background blur.  Better mics or mic boom arms also couldn't hurt and if you do go with lights, light modifiers or more powerful lights is also never a bad investment, though the best place to spend any extra money is going to depend on the kind of shooting you are planning on doing.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-29T19:26:05.500Z
Answers.Text: Thanks a bunch! Just one thing, I was checking out the camcorders and they aren't as expensive as i thought they were. What do you thing of those? Again, thank you very much, it's really helpful.
Answers.UserDisplayName: AlanK
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-29T19:49:41.860Z
Answers.Text: @AlanK - what kind of camcorders do you mean?  Your average consumer targeted camcorder in the sub $600 range is going to have a small sensor and a small lens and will likely have a fairly limited dynamic range.  These all make them less than ideal for a professional quality end product.  Things like nice background blurs would be near impossible and low light performance will be substandard compared to larger sensor DSLRs with faster lenses.
Answers.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-29T22:03:08.947Z
Answers.Text: Oh, one other caveat to that sub-$600 statement.  The GoPro is a major exception to that rule.  It has a really great image sensor for the price, but it accomplishes that by sacrificing pretty much any kind of flexibility at all.  It has a decent fixed lens, but no display (without an addon) and no ability to adjust from that one particular focal length.  If it happens to be usable for what you need, it is a lot of camera for a low, low price, but it is very limited in what it can be used for.  It also won't get background blur, but is much better than just about anything else in that space.
Answers.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-29T22:12:10.193Z
Answers.Text: In defence of the Zoom H4n, and this is of course purely subjective, the audio quality is superb. It may not outperform a good shotgun mic in situation where you'll want to use a good shotgun mic, but as an all-round recording device, 'decent' is selling it short.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Marcks Thomas
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-29T22:44:39.803Z
Answers.Text: @marcks for the price I agree, however as digital recorders in general go it is still very noisy. It is the best value around, but it is only decent quality. I say that as a very satisfied h4n owner.
Answers.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-29T23:12:29.037Z
Answers.Text: I should clarify that that is in comparison to professional digital recorders.  It's better than any consumer recorders for the line inputs (there is an Olympus model that beats it for the built in mics for a lower price).  However, compared to a higher end unit (with a higher end price to go with) the noise floor is very high in comparison.
Answers.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2014-01-29T04:24:29.113Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2014-10-21T14:47:49.433Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2014-10-21T14:47:49.433Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Body: <p>I want to start two short film projects but I don't know what equipment I need to get a good professional quality result. I've been saving some money so I hope budget is not a problem. Also, what's most commonly used to record audio in this kind of project? I want to get the sound from two people talking with the camera placed far away from them. I'm trying to make an independent production company so I'm seeing this as an investment. The cheaper the better though.</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-01-31T07:39:33.487Z
Comments.Text: Hello AlanK, and welcome to AVP. I'd just like to suggest adding to your question, with some more specifics. For example, saying "I hope budget is not a problem" and later "The cheaper the better, though" can be very misguiding.
  
  Also, budget gear is different to different people - DSLRs for some, but those working in film will tell you the C500 - at $19k, is a budget camera!
Comments.UserDisplayName: nchpmn
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-01-31T15:24:35.913Z
Comments.Text: @nchpmn - that's more those in Hollywood.  It is quite typical for DSLRs to be used in independent film and even some commercial productions, though the actual way those DSLRs are typically kitted does bring them up near the $19k range.  There are cheaper options available though that meet the professional standards.  You can build a high quality rig around BlackMagic's cameras for around the 10 grand range for the camera itself.  Really hard to do anything truly considered professional for under 5 grand though since most professional lenses will run you 2 to 2 and a half grand alone.
Comments.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-01-31T15:28:39.167Z
Comments.Text: Let alone cinema lenses that start around 20 grand.
Comments.UserDisplayName: AJ Henderson
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2014-02-03T00:07:20.243Z
Comments.Text: @AJHenderson I asked for clarification because OP is asking for "professional quality", where "budget is not a problem". Hence, I'd recommend my 'daily' camera, the C100, as a starting point.
Comments.UserDisplayName: nchpmn
Tags: <camera><video-recording><audio-recording><audio>
Title: What equipment should I get for starting out making professional quality films?
UserDisplayName: AlanK
ThreadText: # What equipment should I get for starting out making professional quality films?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2014-01-29)
  
  I want to start two short film projects but I don't know what equipment I need to get a good professional quality result. I've been saving some money so I hope budget is not a problem. Also, what's most commonly used to record audio in this kind of project? I want to get the sound from two people talking with the camera placed far away from them. I'm trying to make an independent production company so I'm seeing this as an investment. The cheaper the better though.
  
  **Tags:** camera, video-recording, audio-recording, audio
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Hello username_0, and welcome to AVP. I'd just like to suggest adding to your question, with some more specifics. For example, saying "I hope budget is not a problem" and later "The cheaper the better, though" can be very misguiding.  Also, budget gear is different to different people - DSLRs for some, but those working in film will tell you the C500 - at $19k, is a budget camera!  
  > **username_2**: @username_1 - that's more those in Hollywood.  It is quite typical for DSLRs to be used in independent film and even some commercial productions, though the actual way those DSLRs are typically kitted does bring them up near the $19k range.  There are cheaper options available though that meet the professional standards.  You can build a high quality rig around BlackMagic's cameras for around the 10 grand range for the camera itself.  Really hard to do anything truly considered professional for under 5 grand though since most professional lenses will run you 2 to 2 and a half grand alone.  
  > **username_2**: Let alone cinema lenses that start around 20 grand.  
  > **username_1**: @username_2 I asked for clarification because OP is asking for "professional quality", where "budget is not a problem". Hence, I'd recommend my 'daily' camera, the C100, as a starting point.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 5 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2014-01-29. Score: 3 | Accepted answer
  
  For videography, the best bang for your buck is, hands down, going to be an entry level DSLR and a decent lens. For audio, if your budget can allow for it, I suggest getting a stand alone multi-track recorder. The Zoom H4n is a particularly popular model with videographers for its low price and decent (though not superb) audio quality. (Update: The H5 and H6 are now available offering significant upgrades over the H4n, but also at a slightly higher price point.)
  
  There are far better options and values as you get more skill in the field, however for starting out, you probably don't want to invest too much until you get some experience under your belt. It's easy to spend upwards of $10 to $15 grand on a nice videography setup as you get more and more professional, but a $1500-$1700 setup with something like a Canon T4i or Lumix G2 with a moderate level lens and an H4n or similar for recording audio (with some basic shotgun or lavaliere mics) is a decent start.
  
  Also, be sure not to skimp on a tripod. You'll want a solid, sturdy tripod (probably aluminum) with a good fluid tripod head to make sure you can get steady shots. Just a solid tripod alone can run you in to the $350 to $500 range.
  
  If you'll be shooting indoors, you may also need a light kit. A cheap 3 point lighting kit can be had for a couple hundred dollars, though depending on what you intend to shoot, you may be able to get by without this initially.
  
  So overall breakdown I'd recommend starting out is around $500 to $600 on an entry level DSLR, $150 to $300 on a lens (if your DSLR body supports video auto focus, such as the Canon T4i, a stepper motor lens is needed), about $280 for an audio recorder, about $100 to $200 on mics, about $400 on a tripod and optionally about $150-$250 on lights. Altogether, that's about $1600 or $1850 and you should be able to make some pretty solid professional looking stuff.
  
  It does add up quickly, but the good news is that you can improve on the gear incrementally over time once you have the basics. If you do have more than 2 grand to start out with, I'd spend a little bit extra on the lens or the camera body to get better low light performance and better background blur. Better mics or mic boom arms also couldn't hurt and if you do go with lights, light modifiers or more powerful lights is also never a bad investment, though the best place to spend any extra money is going to depend on the kind of shooting you are planning on doing.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Thanks a bunch! Just one thing, I was checking out the camcorders and they aren't as expensive as i thought they were. What do you thing of those? Again, thank you very much, it's really helpful.  
  > **username_2**: @username_0 - what kind of camcorders do you mean?  Your average consumer targeted camcorder in the sub $600 range is going to have a small sensor and a small lens and will likely have a fairly limited dynamic range.  These all make them less than ideal for a professional quality end product.  Things like nice background blurs would be near impossible and low light performance will be substandard compared to larger sensor DSLRs with faster lenses.  
  > **username_2**: Oh, one other caveat to that sub-$600 statement.  The GoPro is a major exception to that rule.  It has a really great image sensor for the price, but it accomplishes that by sacrificing pretty much any kind of flexibility at all.  It has a decent fixed lens, but no display (without an addon) and no ability to adjust from that one particular focal length.  If it happens to be usable for what you need, it is a lot of camera for a low, low price, but it is very limited in what it can be used for.  It also won't get background blur, but is much better than just about anything else in that space.  
  > **username_7**: In defence of the Zoom H4n, and this is of course purely subjective, the audio quality is superb. It may not outperform a good shotgun mic in situation where you'll want to use a good shotgun mic, but as an all-round recording device, 'decent' is selling it short.  
  > **username_2**: @username_7 for the price I agree, however as digital recorders in general go it is still very noisy. It is the best value around, but it is only decent quality. I say that as a very satisfied h4n owner.  
  > **username_2**: I should clarify that that is in comparison to professional digital recorders.  It's better than any consumer recorders for the line inputs (there is an Olympus model that beats it for the built in mics for a lower price).  However, compared to a higher end unit (with a higher end price to go with) the noise floor is very high in comparison.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_3 on 2014-10-21. Score: 1
  
  I would suggest looking into the black magic pocket cinema camera (bmpcc). This camera has a very wide dynamic range which gives you the possibility to record footage that you can color grade. This is an important part of film making.
  
  Also the bmpcc has a 16mm sensor, this will allow you to buy very reasonably priced and very "filmic" looking 16mm lenses from ebay (make sure to always check reviews of a certain type of lens, not all of them work).
  
  If it is for hobby films look into DIY shoulder rigs sliders cranes and lighting, they will look crappy but will work, pvc is your friend!
  
  For audio a zoom h1 will work (it is cheap and records nice stereo sound and clean mics via the input) h4n is the bigger better brother that allows you to record 4 channels instead of 2.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_4 on 2014-01-31. Score: 1
  
  Zoom H4n is a pretty good unit for audio
  
  Clean up your recordings (if req'd) in Adobe Audition using the Noise Print feature and you can remove a lot of extraneous noise.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: This is not really an answer to the question.  They are asking what equipment do they need for starting out making a professional quality film.  Just an audio recorder does not answer what equipment is needed (or answers it very, very poorly).  
  > **username_4**: Thanks for your feedback. A discussion on equipment might include reference to useful applications and a recommendation on a particular piece of hardware; in this case the Zoom H4n and Adobe Audition.  
  > **username_2**: True, and partial answers are ok, though with no further expansion as to why the H4n is a good choice this is still a rather low quality answer.  If you could expand on it some, that would help it be more useful, particularly since the h4n had already been mentioned.  Also, the noise print feature of Adobe Audition is more or less irrelevant to a question on equipment since it is software and a feature in software that would only be used if there were noise issues in the first place (which a professional quality project should seek to limit or eliminate to begin with.)  
  > **username_2**: I only comment because I think with a little more effort it could be a more valuable answer to the question than it currently is.  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_5 on 2014-10-23. Score: 1
  
  This depends on your budget. I'll assume you have an infinite budget and let you make decisions based on your actual budget.
  
  The first thing you want is a quality camcorder. Some people will recommend a DSLR, but those have issues with color accuracy in film. Get a quality camcorder and make sure it has an external microphone and headphone jack. You may also want something with a hot seat if you want a light or mounted microphone.
  
  When it comes to audio, get a quality shotgun mic. They are very general purpose and work very well if you invest in quality one. The easiest way to record audio is through the microphone jack on the camcorder, but you can also use a separate audio reorder, but this means more work at editing. Some people will tell you to buy a clapboard, but just clapping has always worked fine for me.
  
  Editing is a very important part of the video production process (but remember that doesn't substitute for skill.). Most problems created by cheaper equipment can be fixed more cheaply in editing than by upgrading equipment. My personal favorite programs are Adobe Premiere, which can be expensive, and Lightworks which is slightly less expensive. I've also heard good things about Final Cut and Sony Vegas.
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_6 on 2014-10-20. Score: -1
  
  Here is a list of equipments my film-making friends consider very useful.(I own few of them). Budget is $1800, excluding a good computer and post production software.
  
  1. A decent DSLR camera with kit lens. (eg: Canon t3i with 18-55mm lens - $500)
  2. Prime lens for great image quality and shallow depth of field (Canon 50mm f1.8 - $100). Great for shooting interviews and close shots.
  3. Wide angle lens to capture landscape and real estate (Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 - $500)
  4. A good audio recorder (Zoom h4n - $200)
  5. An image stabilisation device with a gimbal. These are extremely useful to get rid of shakes and obtain smooth, fluid video shots while moving your camera (Glidecam HD2000 is popular and costs $500). A tripod is generally optional once you have this.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: Is there a reason you think a kit lens is worth it?  The image quality from them is considered to not be worth it by most.  
  
  ---
  
  