Answers.Body: <p>It is possible and works in a similar manner. What's different is that normal pixel values in video are always positive, whereas it's normal for audio to go both positive and negative several thousand times per second.</p>
  
  <p>If you have a copy of the axes without the spectrum, you can overlay the image with the spectrum on top of the image of the axes and set the blend mode of the spectrum image to "difference." That will subtract the image of the axes from the spectrum image and leave black where the axes were.</p>
  
  <p>If you don't want black, but some other color, you can use an image mask that sets the axes to an alpha value of 0 and the rest of the image to an alpha value of 1 (or 255 if you're working in 8 bit per channel mode). Then put some other color underneath the masked footage.</p>
  
  <p><strong>EDIT</strong>: I forgot to mention that the image of the axes alone should be black wherever you want the original image to come through. (Because you're then subtracting 0 from the original image in those areas.)</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-10-01T15:50:17.077Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-10-01T16:09:01.273Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2016-10-01T16:09:01.273Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: user1118321
Answers.Body: <p>If your axes are baked in to the video, then, no, you cannot easily remove them because they have replaced, not added to, the underlying image.  One way to remove them would be to create a mask that exactly covers each axis and use that mask to copy and average pixels on either side of the axis. Then place the averaged pixels where the axis used to be.  This will effectively blur-out the offending axes. </p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-10-01T23:40:09.713Z
Answers.Text: Thanks. Yes, I realized my silly mistake when I read the first answer. I have a habit of thinking in terms of sound waves.
Answers.UserDisplayName: n00dles
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2016-10-01T20:20:33.353Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2016-10-01T20:20:33.353Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Michael Tiemann
Body: <p>Firstly, I'm no video professional, I'm an audio professional. Video theory is a dark area for me. So I will use an audio-type analogy in this question.</p>
  
  <p>In audio editing, it is possible to subtract one waveshape from a bunch of other waves by inverting the phase of the wave(phase subtraction). While this is a simple, easy to understand process, due to my lack of knowledge of digital video processing, I am unsure if this process is an available tool in video editing. My logical mind tells me that it is. I know in nature, like in bubbles, phase interactions cause interesting effects.</p>
  
  <p>I need to use this process on a video to remove the axis scales from a 3D spectrogram, so that everything else in the video except the axis scales are left.</p>
  
  <p>For this I assume I need an isolated image of the thing I want to subtract i.e. the axis scales. I'm using Adobe Premiere Pro or After Effects, whichever is best for this. The Image I want to remove is stationary in the video.</p>
  
  <p>Any advice on how to do this in Adobe AE/PP if it <em>can</em> be done is appreciated.</p>
  
Tags: <after-effects><premiere><video-editor><signal-processing>
Title: Remove an image through subtraction?
UserDisplayName: n00dles
ThreadText: # Remove an image through subtraction?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2016-10-01)
  
  Firstly, I'm no video professional, I'm an audio professional. Video theory is a dark area for me. So I will use an audio-type analogy in this question.
  
  In audio editing, it is possible to subtract one waveshape from a bunch of other waves by inverting the phase of the wave(phase subtraction). While this is a simple, easy to understand process, due to my lack of knowledge of digital video processing, I am unsure if this process is an available tool in video editing. My logical mind tells me that it is. I know in nature, like in bubbles, phase interactions cause interesting effects.
  
  I need to use this process on a video to remove the axis scales from a 3D spectrogram, so that everything else in the video except the axis scales are left.
  
  For this I assume I need an isolated image of the thing I want to subtract i.e. the axis scales. I'm using Adobe Premiere Pro or After Effects, whichever is best for this. The Image I want to remove is stationary in the video.
  
  Any advice on how to do this in Adobe AE/PP if it *can* be done is appreciated.
  
  **Tags:** after-effects, premiere, video-editor, signal-processing
  
  
  ---
  
  ## 2 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2016-10-01. Score: 2 | Accepted answer
  
  It is possible and works in a similar manner. What's different is that normal pixel values in video are always positive, whereas it's normal for audio to go both positive and negative several thousand times per second.
  
  If you have a copy of the axes without the spectrum, you can overlay the image with the spectrum on top of the image of the axes and set the blend mode of the spectrum image to "difference." That will subtract the image of the axes from the spectrum image and leave black where the axes were.
  
  If you don't want black, but some other color, you can use an image mask that sets the axes to an alpha value of 0 and the rest of the image to an alpha value of 1 (or 255 if you're working in 8 bit per channel mode). Then put some other color underneath the masked footage.
  
  **EDIT**: I forgot to mention that the image of the axes alone should be black wherever you want the original image to come through. (Because you're then subtracting 0 from the original image in those areas.)
  
  
  ---
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2016-10-01. Score: 1
  
  If your axes are baked in to the video, then, no, you cannot easily remove them because they have replaced, not added to, the underlying image. One way to remove them would be to create a mask that exactly covers each axis and use that mask to copy and average pixels on either side of the axis. Then place the averaged pixels where the axis used to be. This will effectively blur-out the offending axes.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Thanks. Yes, I realized my silly mistake when I read the first answer. I have a habit of thinking in terms of sound waves.  
  
  ---
  
  