Answers.Body: <p><a href="https://video.stackexchange.com/questions/5339/match-two-sounds-with-a-level-of-certainty/5344#5344">https://video.stackexchange.com/questions/5339/match-two-sounds-with-a-level-of-certainty/5344#5344</a></p>
  
  <p>Similar post, but the conclustion was that while the technology exists, it is mainly used to confirm what a song is etc...but you could for sure look into the Shazam or Soundhound APIs to see if you can create a code/script that would do it for you</p>
  
  <p>However if the song, has a point in which the song is literally the only thing playing, you could use a software called pluraleyes, to sync your podcasts to that song, if they find a sync point, most likely it will be that song...</p>
  
  <p>This may or may not work to some degree, there is obviously a high level of error while trying to make it match, the more of the song playing that is not mixed with anything else, the higher the likelyness of this working.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-02-05T11:00:47.727Z
Answers.Text: Pluraleyes is not available for Windows [yet](http://www.redgiantsoftware.com/news/featured/pluraleyes-3-faq/)
Answers.UserDisplayName: Saaru Lindestøkke
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-02-05T21:42:10.387Z
Answers.Text: Additionally Pluraleyes is a kind of expensive. Of course: Compared to a fine it's perhaps cheap. But there has to be a less expensive method, I think.
  I have several seconds in the podcast without any voice on it, so I am quite sure, that if there is a matching tool out there it would have easy work...
Answers.UserDisplayName: Phil
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-04-08T06:58:51.003Z
Answers.Text: This is the only matching software that I know of, there is a free trial
Answers.UserDisplayName: Chris James Champeau
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2013-02-05T01:18:48.550Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2013-02-05T01:18:48.550Z
Answers.LastEditDate: 2017-04-12T07:32:19.270Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Chris James Champeau
Body: <p>Hope, I got the right forum for my question.</p>
  
  <p>I'm a Podcaster and publishing podcasts since 2005. In my first few episodes I used a Music Track as an opener which seems to have a copyright on it, so I got a mail from a lawyer. First of all: Yep, i didn't check the license in detail so I have to pay for this now. I appreciate the work of musicians and I never wanted to do piracy - the website I got the track from seemed to have free tracks and so I used them.</p>
  
  <p>Anyway: I have to commit myself to never ever republish this copyrighted track again. But in The mass of episodes I have created it would be hard work to check of I used the track even after changing the opener to a (real) free track. Is there a possibility to scan my library automatically against a short part of the copyrighted track?</p>
  
  <p>If this is the wrong section, please refer to the correct one.</p>
  
  <p>Thanks in advance</p>
  
  <p>Phil</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-02-02T16:50:20.967Z
Comments.Text: What OS are you on? What format are your podcasts in?
Comments.UserDisplayName: Saaru Lindestøkke
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-02-02T20:40:27.527Z
Comments.Text: I' m using Windows7. But I can also use a Linux Distribution if it's really needed. But Windows is preferred.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Phil
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2013-02-02T22:34:05.867Z
Comments.Text: Sorry, was on mobile, didn't See your Second question: I'm using MP3 as Format.
Comments.UserDisplayName: Phil
Tags: <podcast>
Title: Scan Library for music track
UserDisplayName: Phil
ThreadText: # Scan Library for music track
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2013-02-02)
  
  Hope, I got the right forum for my question.
  
  I'm a Podcaster and publishing podcasts since 2005. In my first few episodes I used a Music Track as an opener which seems to have a copyright on it, so I got a mail from a lawyer. First of all: Yep, i didn't check the license in detail so I have to pay for this now. I appreciate the work of musicians and I never wanted to do piracy - the website I got the track from seemed to have free tracks and so I used them.
  
  Anyway: I have to commit myself to never ever republish this copyrighted track again. But in The mass of episodes I have created it would be hard work to check of I used the track even after changing the opener to a (real) free track. Is there a possibility to scan my library automatically against a short part of the copyrighted track?
  
  If this is the wrong section, please refer to the correct one.
  
  Thanks in advance
  
  username_0
  
  **Tags:** podcast
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: What OS are you on? What format are your podcasts in?  
  > **username_0**: I' m using Windows7. But I can also use a Linux Distribution if it's really needed. But Windows is preferred.  
  > **username_0**: Sorry, was on mobile, didn't See your Second question: I'm using MP3 as Format.  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_2 on 2013-02-05. Score: 1
  
  <https://video.stackexchange.com/questions/5339/match-two-sounds-with-a-level-of-certainty/5344#5344>
  
  Similar post, but the conclustion was that while the technology exists, it is mainly used to confirm what a song is etc...but you could for sure look into the Shazam or Soundhound APIs to see if you can create a code/script that would do it for you
  
  However if the song, has a point in which the song is literally the only thing playing, you could use a software called pluraleyes, to sync your podcasts to that song, if they find a sync point, most likely it will be that song...
  
  This may or may not work to some degree, there is obviously a high level of error while trying to make it match, the more of the song playing that is not mixed with anything else, the higher the likelyness of this working.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_1**: Pluraleyes is not available for Windows [yet](http://www.redgiantsoftware.com/news/featured/pluraleyes-3-faq/)  
  > **username_0**: Additionally Pluraleyes is a kind of expensive. Of course: Compared to a fine it's perhaps cheap. But there has to be a less expensive method, I think. I have several seconds in the podcast without any voice on it, so I am quite sure, that if there is a matching tool out there it would have easy work...  
  > **username_2**: This is the only matching software that I know of, there is a free trial  
  
  ---
  
  