Answers.Body: <p>The problem isn't the remote timing, it's the rate at which data can be written to the SD or CF card.  The camera can shoot a bunch of images quickly in burst mode because it stores them in an internal buffer for a short while before it writes them to memory.  However, this pace of data acquisition is not sustainable for long periods of time because the buffer will fill up before it can offload to the card.  The best thing you can do is make sure you're using cards with the fastest <strong>write speed</strong> possible.  Shooting jpeg only might also help, depending on how quickly the camera converts RAW to jpeg.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-07-12T12:16:34.833Z
Answers.Text: I have a very fast card already - [UDMA 7](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UDMA) - so I very much doubt this is the issue. I've also tried with small, fine JPEG and it doesn't help.
Answers.UserDisplayName: l0b0
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2015-04-03T14:04:11.207Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2015-04-03T14:04:11.207Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Jason Conrad
Body: <p>I'd like to take 1 Hz and sub-second timelapse videos with my Canon 7D. I've tried both <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dslr.dashboard" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DslrDashboard</a> and <a href="http://www.magiclantern.fm/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Magic Lantern</a>, and couldn't figure out how to set the timelapse any faster than that. Worse, <em>both</em> of them ended up taking photos at such a jittery rate that I could <em>hear</em> it was completely off kilter. The camera would take one photo, then wait for a couple seconds before taking two in less than half a second, and so on, making the result unusable for video making. I was using manual mode, and shutter time, f-stop and ISO were <em>all</em> set to static values.</p>
  
  <p>The camera is otherwise perfectly capable of taking many photos per second, even at RAW quality. Is there some fundamental issue with the timing used when remote controlling (and even when using custom firmware) causing this, or did I miss an important setting to make it all work? If this is simply an issue with both these products, are there other software products (preferably FOSS) which will reliably take 1 Hz or faster time lapse series?</p>
  
  <p>(<a href="https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/61528/how-to-do-1-hz-timelapse-photography-with-canon-7d">Repost from photo.SE</a> after suggestion.)</p>
  
Comments.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments.CreationDate: 2015-04-15T20:43:37.540Z
Comments.Text: Should this question be deleted? The photo.SE question got much more response, and by now it's just a dupe...
Comments.UserDisplayName: l0b0
Tags: <canon><time-lapse><magic-lantern>
Title: How to do <=1 Hz timelapse photography with Canon 7D?
UserDisplayName: l0b0
ThreadText: # How to do <=1 Hz timelapse photography with Canon 7D?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-02)
  
  I'd like to take 1 Hz and sub-second timelapse videos with my Canon 7D. I've tried both [DslrDashboard](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dslr.dashboard) and [Magic Lantern](http://www.magiclantern.fm/), and couldn't figure out how to set the timelapse any faster than that. Worse, *both* of them ended up taking photos at such a jittery rate that I could *hear* it was completely off kilter. The camera would take one photo, then wait for a couple seconds before taking two in less than half a second, and so on, making the result unusable for video making. I was using manual mode, and shutter time, f-stop and ISO were *all* set to static values.
  
  The camera is otherwise perfectly capable of taking many photos per second, even at RAW quality. Is there some fundamental issue with the timing used when remote controlling (and even when using custom firmware) causing this, or did I miss an important setting to make it all work? If this is simply an issue with both these products, are there other software products (preferably FOSS) which will reliably take 1 Hz or faster time lapse series?
  
  ([Repost from photo.SE](https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/61528/how-to-do-1-hz-timelapse-photography-with-canon-7d) after suggestion.)
  
  **Tags:** canon, time-lapse, magic-lantern
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: Should this question be deleted? The photo.SE question got much more response, and by now it's just a dupe...  
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2015-04-03. Score: 1
  
  The problem isn't the remote timing, it's the rate at which data can be written to the SD or CF card. The camera can shoot a bunch of images quickly in burst mode because it stores them in an internal buffer for a short while before it writes them to memory. However, this pace of data acquisition is not sustainable for long periods of time because the buffer will fill up before it can offload to the card. The best thing you can do is make sure you're using cards with the fastest **write speed** possible. Shooting jpeg only might also help, depending on how quickly the camera converts RAW to jpeg.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_0**: I have a very fast card already - [UDMA 7](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UDMA) - so I very much doubt this is the issue. I've also tried with small, fine JPEG and it doesn't help.  
  
  ---
  
  