Dataset Viewer
text
stringlengths 615
31k
|
|---|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
is_delete_application = And(
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication,
Txn.application_id() != Int(0)
)
program = Seq([
Assert(Global.latest_timestamp() > Int(0)),
Cond([is_delete_application, Return(Int(1))]),
Log(Bytes("Contratto_approvato")),
If(Txn.amount() > Int(1000),
Log(Bytes("Transazione_superiore_1000_microalgo")),
),
Return(Int(1))
])
return program
def clear_program():
program = Seq([
Log(Bytes("Clear eseguito")),
Return(Int(1))
])
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
auction_end_key = Bytes("auction_end")
highest_bid_key = Bytes("highest_bid")
highest_bidder_key = Bytes("highest_bidder")
on_creation = Seq(
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
Return(Int(1))
)
is_admin = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)
handle_start_auction = Seq(
Assert(is_admin),
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2)),
App.globalPut(auction_end_key, Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
Return(Int(1))
)
handle_bid = Seq(
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2)),
Assert(Global.latest_timestamp() < App.globalGet(auction_end_key)),
If(
Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]) > App.globalGet(highest_bid_key),
Seq(
App.globalPut(highest_bid_key, Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
App.globalPut(highest_bidder_key, Txn.sender()),
)
),
Return(Int(1))
)
handle_end_auction = Seq(
Assert(is_admin),
Assert(Global.latest_timestamp() >= App.globalGet(auction_end_key)),
Return(Int(1))
)
handle_deleteapp = Seq(
Return(Int(1))
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp,
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("start_auction"), handle_start_auction],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("bid"), handle_bid],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("end_auction"), handle_end_auction],
[Int(1), Return(Int(0))]
)
],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_deleteapp],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, Reject()],
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
global_owner = Bytes("owner")
global_proposal_1_votes = Bytes("proposal_1_votes")
global_proposal_2_votes = Bytes("proposal_2_votes")
on_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(global_owner, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(global_proposal_1_votes, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(global_proposal_2_votes, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
])
vote_proposal_1 = Seq([
App.globalPut(global_proposal_1_votes, App.globalGet(global_proposal_1_votes) + Int(1)),
Return(Int(1))
])
vote_proposal_2 = Seq([
App.globalPut(global_proposal_2_votes, App.globalGet(global_proposal_2_votes) + Int(1)),
Return(Int(1))
])
delete_app = Seq([
Return(Int(1))
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, delete_app],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, Reject()],
[Txn.application_args.length() > Int(0),
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("vote_1"), vote_proposal_1],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("vote_2"), vote_proposal_2],
)
],
[Int(1), Return(Int(0))]
)
return program
def clear_state_program():
return Return(Int(1))
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def simplified_contract():
is_delete_application = And(
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication,
Txn.application_id() != Int(0)
)
read_local_state = App.localGet(Txn.sender(), Bytes("key"))
is_valid_sender = Txn.sender() == Global.creator_address()
program = Cond(
[is_delete_application, Return(Int(1))],
[is_valid_sender, Return(read_local_state == Int(42))],
[Int(1), Return(Int(0))]
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def modified_contract():
is_delete_application = And(
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication,
Txn.application_id() != Int(0)
)
is_valid_sender = Txn.sender() == Global.creator_address()
program = Cond(
[is_delete_application, Return(Int(1))],
[is_valid_sender, Return(App.localGet(Txn.sender(), Bytes("key")))],
[Int(1), Return(Int(0))]
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
add_score = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2),
Len(Txn.application_args[0]) <= Int(32),
Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]) >= Int(0),
)
),
App.globalPut(Txn.application_args[0], Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
Approve()
])
get_score = Seq([
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1)),
Return(App.globalGet(Txn.application_args[0]) >= Int(0))
])
delete_contract = Approve()
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("add_score"), add_score],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("get_score"), get_score]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, delete_contract]
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
add_proposal = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1),
Len(Txn.application_args[0]) <= Int(50)
)
),
App.globalPut(Txn.application_args[0], Int(0)),
Approve()
])
proposal_check = App.globalGetEx(Int(0), Txn.application_args[0])
vote_proposal = Seq([
proposal_check,
Assert(
And(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1),
proposal_check.hasValue()
)
),
App.globalPut(
Txn.application_args[0],
App.globalGet(Txn.application_args[0]) + Int(1)
),
Approve()
])
get_votes = Seq([
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1)),
Return(App.globalGet(Txn.application_args[0]) >= Int(0))
])
delete_contract = Approve()
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("add_proposal"), add_proposal],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("vote"), vote_proposal],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("get_votes"), get_votes]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, delete_contract]
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def admin_controlled_contract():
admin = Addr("G3RKMA6LEPYGRR3ANNX64WNBK2S44OQMGHH5SIGQAY6T2SVSLAGAHIZSKY")
on_creation = Seq(
App.globalPut(Bytes("admin"), admin),
App.globalPut(Bytes("counter"), Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
)
is_admin = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(Bytes("admin"))
on_increment = Seq(
App.globalPut(Bytes("counter"), App.globalGet(Bytes("counter")) + Int(1)),
Return(Int(1))
)
on_update_admin = Seq(
App.globalPut(Bytes("admin"), Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
Return(Int(1))
)
on_delete = Seq(
Return(Int(1))
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, on_delete],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("increment"), on_increment],
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
local_key = Bytes("counter")
global_key = Bytes("owner")
handle_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(global_key, Txn.sender()),
App.localPut(Int(0), local_key, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
])
handle_increment = Seq([
App.localPut(Int(0), local_key, App.localGet(Int(0), local_key) + Int(1)),
Return(Int(1))
])
handle_get = Seq([
Return(App.localGet(Int(0), local_key))
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Return(Int(1))
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), handle_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete],
[Txn.application_args.length() > Int(0),
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("increment"), handle_increment],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("get"), handle_get],
)
],
[Int(1), Return(Int(0))]
)
return program
def clear_state_program():
return Return(Int(1))
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
local_key = Bytes("counter")
global_key = Bytes("owner")
handle_creation = Seq(
App.globalPut(global_key, Txn.sender()),
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), local_key, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
)
is_owner = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(global_key)
handle_increment = Seq(
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), local_key, App.localGet(Txn.sender(), local_key) + Int(1)),
Return(Int(1))
)
handle_get = Seq(
Return(App.localGet(Txn.sender(), local_key))
)
handle_delete = Seq(
Return(Int(1))
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), handle_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete],
[Txn.application_args.length() > Int(0),
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("increment"), handle_increment],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("get"), handle_get],
[Int(1), Return(Int(0))]
)
],
[Int(1), Return(Int(0))]
)
return program
def clear_state_program():
return Return(Int(1))
if __name__ == "__main__":
approval = compileTeal(approval_program(), Mode.Application, version=6)
clear = compileTeal(clear_state_program(), Mode.Application, version=6)
print("Approval Program:")
print(approval)
print("\nClear State Program:")
print(clear)* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
global_owner = Bytes("owner")
global_highest_bidder = Bytes("highest_bidder")
global_highest_bid = Bytes("highest_bid")
on_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(global_owner, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(global_highest_bidder, Global.zero_address()),
App.globalPut(global_highest_bid, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
])
highest_bid = App.globalGet(global_highest_bid)
bid = Seq([
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1)),
Assert(Btoi(Txn.application_args[0]) > highest_bid),
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(global_owner)),
App.globalPut(global_highest_bidder, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(global_highest_bid, Btoi(Txn.application_args[0])),
Return(Int(1))
])
delete_app = Seq([
Return(Int(1))
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, delete_app],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("bid"), bid]
)
return program
def clear_state_program():
return Return(Int(1))
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Deletion.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary deletion vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to enforce strict validation of transaction logic and ensure proper authorization checks. This helps prevent unauthorized deletion of local state and avoids unintended behavior in the contract. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
config_key = Bytes("config")
total_supply_key = Bytes("total_supply")
on_creation = Seq(
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(total_supply_key, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
)
is_admin = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)
handle_update_config = Seq(
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2)),
App.globalPut(config_key, Txn.application_args[1]),
Return(Int(1))
)
handle_mint = Seq(
Assert(is_admin),
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2)),
App.globalPut(total_supply_key, App.globalGet(total_supply_key) + Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
Return(Int(1))
)
handle_get_config = Seq(
Return(App.globalGet(config_key))
)
handle_get_total_supply = Seq(
Return(App.globalGet(total_supply_key))
)
handle_deleteapp = Seq(
Assert(is_admin),
Return(Int(1))
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication,
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("update_config"), handle_update_config],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("mint"), handle_mint],
[Int(1), Reject()]
)
],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp,
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("get_config"), handle_get_config],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("get_total_supply"), handle_get_total_supply],
[Int(1), Reject()]
)
],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_deleteapp],
[Int(1), Reject()]
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
total_donations_key = Bytes("total_donations")
project_goal_key = Bytes("project_goal")
user_donations_key = Bytes("user_donations")
handle_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(total_donations_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(project_goal_key, Int(10000)),
Approve()
])
handle_donation = Seq([
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1)),
Assert(Btoi(Txn.application_args[0]) > Int(0)),
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), user_donations_key, App.localGet(Txn.sender(), user_donations_key) + Btoi(Txn.application_args[0])),
App.globalPut(total_donations_key, App.globalGet(total_donations_key) + Btoi(Txn.application_args[0])),
Approve()
])
handle_update_goal = Seq([
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1)),
App.globalPut(project_goal_key, Btoi(Txn.application_args[0])),
Approve()
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
Approve()
])
handle_optin = Seq([
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), user_donations_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_closeout = Approve()
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), handle_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("donate"), handle_donation],
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, handle_update_goal],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.OptIn, handle_optin],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.CloseOut, handle_closeout],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
authorized_list_key = Bytes("authorized")
on_creation = Seq(
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
Return(Int(1))
)
is_admin = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)
i = ScratchVar(TealType.uint64)
handle_updateapp = Seq(
i.store(Int(1)),
While(i.load() < Txn.application_args.length()).Do(
Seq(
App.globalPut(
Concat(authorized_list_key, Txn.application_args[i.load()]),
Int(1)
),
i.store(i.load() + Int(1))
)
),
Return(Int(1))
)
handle_is_authorized = Seq(
Return(
App.globalGet(Concat(authorized_list_key, Txn.sender()))
)
)
handle_deleteapp = Seq(
Assert(is_admin),
Return(Int(1))
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, handle_updateapp],
[
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp,
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("is_authorized"), handle_is_authorized],
[Int(1), Reject()]
),
],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_deleteapp],
[Int(1), Reject()]
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
if __name__ == "__main__":
approval_teal = compileTeal(approval_program(), Mode.Application, version=6)
clear_teal = compileTeal(clear_program(), Mode.Application, version=6)
print("Approval Program:")
print(approval_teal)* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
goal_key = Bytes("donation_goal")
total_donated_key = Bytes("total_donated")
on_creation = Seq(
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(total_donated_key, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
)
is_admin = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)
handle_set_goal = Seq(
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2)),
App.globalPut(goal_key, Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
Return(Int(1))
)
handle_donate = Seq(
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2)),
App.globalPut(total_donated_key, App.globalGet(total_donated_key) + Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
Return(Int(1))
)
handle_get_goal = Seq(
Return(App.globalGet(goal_key))
)
handle_get_total_donated = Seq(
Return(App.globalGet(total_donated_key))
)
handle_deleteapp = Seq(
Assert(is_admin),
Return(Int(1))
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication,
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("set_goal"), handle_set_goal],
[Int(1), Reject()]
)
],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp,
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("donate"), handle_donate],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("get_goal"), handle_get_goal],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("get_total_donated"), handle_get_total_donated],
[Int(1), Reject()]
)
],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_deleteapp],
[Int(1), Reject()]
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_complex_contract():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
app_state_key = Bytes("app_state")
init = Seq(
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(app_state_key, Int(1)),
Approve()
)
handle_update = Seq(
App.globalPut(app_state_key, App.globalGet(app_state_key) + Int(1)),
Approve()
)
handle_noop = Cond(
[
Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("read_state"),
Approve(),
],
[
Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("write_state"),
Seq(
App.globalPut(app_state_key, Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
Approve()
),
],
[
Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("arbitrary_action"),
Seq(
App.globalDel(app_state_key),
Approve()
),
],
)
handle_delete = Seq(
If(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)).Then(
Approve()
).Else(
Reject()
)
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), init],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, handle_update],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, handle_noop],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete],
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_quota_contract():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
usage_limit_key = Bytes("usage_limit")
global_counter_key = Bytes("counter")
init = Seq(
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(usage_limit_key, Int(100)),
App.globalPut(global_counter_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
)
handle_update = Seq(
App.globalPut(global_counter_key, App.globalGet(global_counter_key) + Int(5)),
Approve()
)
handle_delete = Seq(
If(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key))
.Then(
Approve()
)
.Else(
Reject()
)
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), init],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, handle_update],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete],
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
owner_key = Bytes("owner")
reservations_key = Bytes("reservations")
handle_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(owner_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(reservations_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_reservation = Seq([
App.globalPut(reservations_key, App.globalGet(reservations_key) + Int(1)),
Approve()
])
handle_update = Seq([
App.globalPut(reservations_key, App.globalGet(reservations_key) - Int(1)),
Approve()
])
handle_optin = Approve()
handle_closeout = Approve()
handle_delete = Reject()
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), handle_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, handle_reservation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, handle_update],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.OptIn, handle_optin],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.CloseOut, handle_closeout],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, Reject()]
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
total_credits_key = Bytes("total_credits")
user_credits_key = Bytes("user_credits")
handle_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(total_credits_key, Int(10000)),
Approve()
])
handle_add_credits = Seq([
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), user_credits_key, App.localGet(Txn.sender(), user_credits_key) + Int(10)),
App.globalPut(total_credits_key, App.globalGet(total_credits_key) - Int(10)),
Approve()
])
handle_update_credits = Seq([
App.globalPut(total_credits_key, App.globalGet(total_credits_key) + Int(1000)),
Approve()
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
Approve()
])
handle_optin = Seq([
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), user_credits_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_closeout = Approve()
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), handle_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, handle_add_credits],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, handle_update_credits],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.OptIn, handle_optin],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.CloseOut, handle_closeout],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
total_points_key = Bytes("total_points")
user_points_key = Bytes("user_points")
handle_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(total_points_key, Int(5000)),
Approve()
])
handle_earn_points = Seq([
Assert(App.globalGet(total_points_key) >= Int(50)),
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), user_points_key, App.localGet(Txn.sender(), user_points_key) + Int(50)),
App.globalPut(total_points_key, App.globalGet(total_points_key) - Int(50)),
Approve()
])
handle_update_points = Seq([
App.globalPut(total_points_key, App.globalGet(total_points_key) + Int(1000)),
Approve()
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
Approve()
])
handle_optin = Seq([
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), user_points_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_closeout = Approve()
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), handle_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, handle_earn_points],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, handle_update_points],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.OptIn, handle_optin],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.CloseOut, handle_closeout],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_deposit_contract():
balance_key = Bytes("balance")
init = Seq(
App.globalPut(balance_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
)
handle_update = Seq(
Approve()
)
handle_deposit = Seq(
App.globalPut(balance_key, App.globalGet(balance_key) + Txn.amount()),
Approve()
)
handle_withdraw = Seq(
Assert(App.globalGet(balance_key) >= Txn.amount()),
App.globalPut(balance_key, App.globalGet(balance_key) - Txn.amount()),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.Payment,
TxnField.receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.amount: Txn.amount()
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Approve()
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), init],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, handle_update],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp,
Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("deposit"), handle_deposit],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("withdraw"), handle_withdraw],
)],
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Arbitrary Update.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-113, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent arbitrary update vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to implement strict checks on state modification operations and ensure that only authorized users can update specific state variables. This helps avoid unintended changes to the contract's state and ensures that updates are performed according to the predefined logic. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def secure_service_booking_contract():
booking_key = Bytes("total_bookings")
admin_key = Bytes("admin_address")
user_bookings_key = Bytes("user_bookings")
init_application = Seq([
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(booking_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_booking = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0),
Gtxn[0].receiver() == Global.current_application_address()
)
),
App.globalPut(booking_key, App.globalGet(booking_key) + Gtxn[0].amount()),
App.localPut(
Txn.sender(),
user_bookings_key,
App.localGet(Txn.sender(), user_bookings_key) + Gtxn[0].amount()
),
Approve()
])
handle_cancellation = Seq([
Assert(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2)
),
If(
Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]) <= App.localGet(Txn.sender(), user_bookings_key),
Seq([
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.Payment,
TxnField.receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.amount: Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]),
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
App.localPut(
Txn.sender(),
user_bookings_key,
App.localGet(Txn.sender(), user_bookings_key) - Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])
),
App.globalPut(
booking_key,
App.globalGet(booking_key) - Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])
),
]),
Reject()
),
Approve()
])
delete_application = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
Approve()
])
program = Seq([
Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), init_application],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("book_service"), handle_booking],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("cancel_booking"), handle_cancellation]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, delete_application]
),
Approve()
])
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
compiled = compileTeal(secure_service_booking_contract(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5)
print(compiled)* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
approved_receiver_1 = Bytes("receiver_1")
approved_receiver_2 = Bytes("receiver_2")
is_valid_payment_txn_1 = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0),
Gtxn[0].receiver() == App.globalGet(approved_receiver_1)
)
is_valid_payment_txn_2 = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].amount() > Int(0),
Gtxn[1].receiver() == App.globalGet(approved_receiver_2)
)
is_valid_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(2)
group_is_valid = And(
is_valid_group_size,
is_valid_payment_txn_1,
is_valid_payment_txn_2
)
on_set_receivers = Seq(
Assert(Txn.sender() == Global.creator_address()),
App.globalPut(approved_receiver_1, Txn.application_args[0]),
App.globalPut(approved_receiver_2, Txn.application_args[1]),
Approve()
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.OptIn, Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, If(group_is_valid, Approve(), Reject())],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, Reject()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, Reject()],
[Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2), on_set_receivers]
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
if __name__ == "__main__":
with open("approval_two_payments.teal", "w") as f:
f.write(compileTeal(approval_program(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5))
with open("clear.teal", "w") as f:
f.write(compileTeal(clear_program(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
creator_key = Bytes("Creator")
admin_key = Bytes("Admin")
user_count_key = Bytes("UserCount")
vote_count_key = Bytes("VoteCount")
vote_result_key = Bytes("VoteResult")
on_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(creator_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(user_count_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(vote_count_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(vote_result_key, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
])
is_creator = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(creator_key)
is_admin = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)
on_update = Seq([
Assert(And(
Txn.application_id() != Int(0),
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication,
is_creator
)),
Return(Int(1))
])
on_delete = Seq([
Assert(And(
Txn.application_id() != Int(0),
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication,
is_creator
)),
Return(Int(1))
])
add_user = Seq([
Assert(is_admin),
App.globalPut(user_count_key, App.globalGet(user_count_key) + Int(1)),
Return(Int(1))
])
start_vote = Seq([
Assert(is_admin),
App.globalPut(vote_count_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(vote_result_key, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
])
cast_vote = Seq([
App.globalPut(vote_count_key, App.globalGet(vote_count_key) + Int(1)),
If(Btoi(Txn.application_args[0]) == Int(1),
App.globalPut(vote_result_key, App.globalGet(vote_result_key) + Int(1)),
App.globalPut(vote_result_key, App.globalGet(vote_result_key) - Int(1))),
Return(Int(1))
])
assign_admin = Seq([
Assert(is_creator),
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.application_args[0]),
Return(Int(1))
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, on_update],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, on_delete],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("add_user"), add_user],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("start_vote"), start_vote],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("cast_vote"), cast_vote],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("assign_admin"), assign_admin]
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
compiled = compileTeal(approval_program(), mode=Mode.Application, version=2)
print(compiled)* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def application_start():
on_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(Bytes("Creator"), Txn.sender()),
Return(Int(1))
])
on_update = Seq([
Assert(And(
Txn.application_id() != Int(0),
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication,
App.globalGet(Bytes("Creator")) == Txn.sender()
)),
Return(Int(1))
])
on_delete = Seq([
Assert(And(
Txn.application_id() != Int(0),
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication,
App.globalGet(Bytes("Creator")) == Txn.sender()
)),
Return(Int(1))
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, on_update],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, on_delete]
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
compiled = compileTeal(application_start(), mode=Mode.Application, version=2)
print(compiled)* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def project_competition_contract():
project_key = Bytes("highest_score")
max_score_key = Bytes("max_score")
admin_addr = Addr("F2CLG5KVJ3I62KOURJGU2NIPJKVHROAV6UKGFX7BQWHLMH7CTVSOEGUFI4")
end_competition = Bytes("end_competition")
winner = Bytes("winner")
init_application = Seq([
App.globalPut(admin_addr, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(max_score_key, Btoi(Txn.application_args[0])),
App.globalPut(project_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_submission = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0),
Gtxn[0].amount() <= App.globalGet(max_score_key),
Gtxn[0].receiver() == App.globalGet(admin_addr)
)
),
App.globalPut(project_key, App.globalGet(project_key) + Gtxn[0].amount()),
App.globalPut(winner, Gtxn[0].sender()),
Approve()
])
handle_end_competition = Seq([
Assert(
Txn.sender() == admin_addr,
App.globalGet(project_key) > Int(0)
),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.Payment,
TxnField.receiver: App.globalGet(winner),
TxnField.amount: App.globalGet(project_key),
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
App.globalPut(project_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
program = Seq(
Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), init_application],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("submit"), handle_submission],
[Txn.application_args[0] == end_competition, handle_end_competition]
)],
),
Reject()
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
compiled = compileTeal(project_competition_contract(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5)
print(compiled)* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_auction_contract():
admin_addr = Addr("B37SRWKTJXECD5IXELK4KX6U6SBRJJ5WCJIZG5ZP6NEEFOS24TLDA5LIIY")
highest_bid_key = Bytes("highest_bid")
highest_bidder_key = Bytes("highest_bidder")
handle_place_bid = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0],
Gtxn[0].receiver() == App.globalGet(admin_addr)
)
),
App.globalPut(highest_bid_key, Gtxn[0].asset_amount()),
App.globalPut(highest_bidder_key, Gtxn[0].sender()),
Approve()
])
handle_close_auction = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(highest_bidder_key)),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.asset_amount: App.globalGet(highest_bid_key),
TxnField.xfer_asset: Txn.assets[0],
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Approve()
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == admin_addr),
Approve()
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("place_bid"), handle_place_bid],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("close_auction"), handle_close_auction]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
compiled = compileTeal(vulnerable_auction_contract(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5)
print(compiled)* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
creator_key = Bytes("Creator")
admin_key = Bytes("Admin")
resource_count_key = Bytes("ResourceCount")
vote_count_key = Bytes("VoteCount")
vote_result_key = Bytes("VoteResult")
asset_id_key = Bytes("AssetID")
on_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(creator_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(resource_count_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(vote_count_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(vote_result_key, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
])
on_update = Seq([
Assert(And(
Txn.application_id() != Int(0),
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication,
Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(creator_key)
)),
Return(Int(1))
])
on_delete = Seq([
Assert(And(
Txn.application_id() != Int(0),
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication,
Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(creator_key)
)),
Return(Int(1))
])
add_resource = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
App.globalPut(resource_count_key, App.globalGet(resource_count_key) + Int(1)),
Return(Int(1))
])
start_vote = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
App.globalPut(vote_count_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(vote_result_key, Int(0)),
Return(Int(1))
])
cast_vote = Seq([
App.globalPut(vote_count_key, App.globalGet(vote_count_key) + Int(1)),
If(Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]) == Int(1),
App.globalPut(vote_result_key, App.globalGet(vote_result_key) + Int(1)),
App.globalPut(vote_result_key, App.globalGet(vote_result_key) - Int(1))),
Return(Int(1))
])
assign_admin = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(creator_key)),
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.application_args[1]),
Return(Int(1))
])
create_asset = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(creator_key)),
App.globalPut(asset_id_key, Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
Return(Int(1))
])
opt_in_asset = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.xfer_asset: App.globalGet(asset_id_key),
TxnField.asset_amount: Int(0),
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.sender()
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Return(Int(1))
])
transfer_asset = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.xfer_asset: App.globalGet(asset_id_key),
TxnField.asset_amount: Btoi(Txn.application_args[2]),
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.application_args[1]
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Return(Int(1))
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, on_update],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, on_delete],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("add_resource"), add_resource],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("start_vote"), start_vote],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("cast_vote"), cast_vote],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("assign_admin"), assign_admin],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("create_asset"), create_asset],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("opt_in_asset"), opt_in_asset],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("transfer_asset"), transfer_asset]
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
compiled = compileTeal(approval_program(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5)
print(compiled)* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
approved_receivers = Bytes("approved_receivers")
is_asset_transfer = Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer
receiver_is_approved = App.localGet(Int(0), approved_receivers) == Txn.asset_receiver()
valid_asset_amount = Txn.asset_amount() > Int(0)
handle_optin = Seq(
App.localPut(Int(0), approved_receivers, Txn.sender()),
Approve()
)
handle_asset_transfer = Seq(
Assert(receiver_is_approved),
Assert(valid_asset_amount),
Approve()
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.OptIn, handle_optin],
[is_asset_transfer, handle_asset_transfer],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.CloseOut, Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, Reject()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, Reject()],
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
if __name__ == "__main__":
with open("approval.teal", "w") as f:
f.write(compileTeal(approval_program(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5))
with open("clear.teal", "w") as f:
f.write(compileTeal(clear_program(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
creator_key = Bytes("Creator")
asset_id_key = Bytes("AssetID")
valid_receiver_key = Bytes("ValidReceiver")
on_creation = Seq([
App.globalPut(creator_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(asset_id_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(valid_receiver_key, Bytes("")),
Return(Int(1))
])
is_creator = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(creator_key)
is_valid_receiver = Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(valid_receiver_key)
on_update = Seq([
Assert(And(
Txn.application_id() != Int(0),
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication,
is_creator
)),
Return(Int(1))
])
on_delete = Seq([
Assert(And(
Txn.application_id() != Int(0),
Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication,
is_creator
)),
Return(Int(1))
])
create_asset = Seq([
Assert(is_creator),
App.globalPut(asset_id_key, Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
Return(Int(1))
])
assign_valid_receiver = Seq([
Assert(is_creator),
App.globalPut(valid_receiver_key, Txn.application_args[1]),
Return(Int(1))
])
opt_in_asset = Seq([
Assert(And(
is_creator,
App.globalGet(valid_receiver_key) != Bytes("")
)),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.xfer_asset: App.globalGet(asset_id_key),
TxnField.asset_amount: Int(0),
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.sender()
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Return(Int(1))
])
transfer_asset = Seq([
Assert(And(
is_creator,
is_valid_receiver
)),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.xfer_asset: App.globalGet(asset_id_key),
TxnField.asset_amount: Btoi(Txn.application_args[2]),
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.application_args[1]
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Return(Int(1))
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_creation],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, on_update],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, on_delete],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("create_asset"), create_asset],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("assign_valid_receiver"), assign_valid_receiver],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("opt_in_asset"), opt_in_asset],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("transfer_asset"), transfer_asset]
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
compiled = compileTeal(approval_program(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5)
print(compiled)* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
approved_payment_receiver = Bytes("pay_receiver")
approved_asset_receiver = Bytes("asset_receiver")
is_valid_payment_txn = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0),
Gtxn[0].receiver() == App.globalGet(approved_payment_receiver)
)
is_valid_asset_transfer_txn = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].asset_amount() > Int(0),
Gtxn[1].asset_receiver() == App.globalGet(approved_asset_receiver)
)
is_valid_app_call_txn = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[2].application_id() != Int(0),
Gtxn[2].on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp
)
is_valid_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(3)
group_is_valid = And(
is_valid_group_size,
is_valid_payment_txn,
is_valid_asset_transfer_txn,
is_valid_app_call_txn
)
on_set_receivers = Seq(
Assert(Txn.sender() == Global.creator_address()),
App.globalPut(approved_payment_receiver, Txn.application_args[0]),
App.globalPut(approved_asset_receiver, Txn.application_args[1]),
Approve()
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.OptIn, Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, If(group_is_valid, Approve(), Reject())],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.UpdateApplication, Reject()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, Reject()],
[Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2), on_set_receivers]
)
return program
def clear_program():
return Approve()
if __name__ == "__main__":
with open("approval_receivers.teal", "w") as f:
f.write(compileTeal(approval_program(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5))
with open("clear.teal", "w") as f:
f.write(compileTeal(clear_program(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def verbose_asset_transfer_contract():
unused_variable_1 = Int(42)
unused_variable_2 = Bytes("Algorand")
group_size_valid = Global.group_size() == Int(3)
first_payment_txn_checks = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0),
Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Or(
Gtxn[0].receiver() != Global.creator_address(),
unused_variable_1 == Int(42),
),
)
redundant_check = Gtxn[1].last_valid() > Int(0)
extra_variable = Gtxn[1].sender()
second_asset_transfer_checks = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(2000),
Gtxn[1].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].xfer_asset() != Int(0),
Gtxn[1].asset_amount() > Int(10),
redundant_check,
)
dummy_variable = Int(999)
third_payment_txn_checks = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].receiver() != Gtxn[1].sender(),
dummy_variable == Int(999),
)
program_logic = And(
group_size_valid,
first_payment_txn_checks,
second_asset_transfer_checks,
third_payment_txn_checks,
UnusedFunction(),
)
return program_logic
def UnusedFunction():
return Int(1)
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(compileTeal(verbose_asset_transfer_contract(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=5))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def asset_transfer_contract():
allowed_asset_id = Int(54321)
allowed_receiver_1 = Addr("XDAXQZPGATU7CKDXWKO6HNRZC6R7MCOL2FBG5TLKWDKZWGB22MYNYS53KM")
allowed_receiver_2 = Addr("3VY3UYQGB2HOH26SWZO2HAZQ66LQ3FBQO6N2BKEAN5UPH4BVNTWGG7DRZ4")
max_transfer_amount = Int(500000)
min_fee = Int(1000)
max_fee = Int(2000)
min_round = Int(1500)
max_round = Int(2500)
check_type_1 = Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer
check_type_2 = Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer
check_asset_id_1 = Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == allowed_asset_id
check_asset_id_2 = Gtxn[1].xfer_asset() == allowed_asset_id
check_receiver_1 = Gtxn[0].receiver() == allowed_receiver_1
check_receiver_2 = Gtxn[1].receiver() == allowed_receiver_2
check_amount_1 = Gtxn[0].amount() <= max_transfer_amount
check_amount_2 = Gtxn[1].amount() <= max_transfer_amount
check_time = And(
Global.round() >= min_round,
Global.round() <= max_round
)
check_close_rem_to_1 = Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address()
check_close_rem_to_2 = Gtxn[1].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address()
check_rekey_to_1 = Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
check_rekey_to_2 = Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
check_fee_1 = Gtxn[0].fee() >= min_fee
check_fee_2 = Gtxn[1].fee() >= min_fee
check_fee_max_1 = Gtxn[0].fee() <= max_fee
check_fee_max_2 = Gtxn[1].fee() <= max_fee
check_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(2)
program = And(
check_type_1,
check_asset_id_1,
check_receiver_1,
check_amount_1,
check_time,
check_close_rem_to_1,
check_rekey_to_1,
check_fee_1,
check_fee_max_1,
check_type_2,
check_asset_id_2,
check_receiver_2,
check_amount_2,
check_close_rem_to_2,
check_rekey_to_2,
check_fee_2,
check_fee_max_2,
check_group_size
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
with open("asset_transfer_contract_v3.teal", "w") as f:
f.write(compileTeal(asset_transfer_contract(), mode=Mode.Application, version=5))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *
from pyteal import *
tmpl_fee = Int(1000)
tmpl_rcv1 = Addr("6ZHGHH5Z5CTPCF5WCESXMGRSVK7QJETR63M3NY5FJCUYDHO57VTCMJOBGY")
tmpl_rcv2 = Addr("7Z5PWO2C6LFNQFGHWKSK5H47IQP5OJW2M3HA2QPXTY3WTNP5NU2MHBW27M")
tmpl_own = Addr("5MK5NGBRT5RL6IGUSYDIX5P7TNNZKRVXKT6FGVI6UVK6IZAWTYQGE4RZIQ")
tmpl_ratn = Int(1)
tmpl_ratd = Int(3)
tmpl_min_pay = Int(1000)
tmpl_timeout = Int(3000)
def split(
tmpl_fee=tmpl_fee,
tmpl_rcv1=tmpl_rcv1,
tmpl_rcv2=tmpl_rcv2,
tmpl_own=tmpl_own,
tmpl_ratn=tmpl_ratn,
tmpl_ratd=tmpl_ratd,
tmpl_min_pay=tmpl_min_pay,
tmpl_timeout=tmpl_timeout,
):
split_core = And(
Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Txn.fee() < tmpl_fee,
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
split_transfer = And(
Gtxn[0].sender() == Gtxn[1].sender(),
Txn.close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].receiver() == tmpl_rcv1,
Gtxn[1].receiver() == tmpl_rcv2,
Gtxn[0].amount()
== ((Gtxn[0].amount() + Gtxn[1].amount()) * tmpl_ratn) / tmpl_ratd,
Gtxn[0].amount() == tmpl_min_pay,
)
split_close = And(
Txn.close_remainder_to() == tmpl_own,
Txn.receiver() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.amount() == Int(0),
Txn.first_valid() > tmpl_timeout,
)
split_program = And(
split_core, If(Global.group_size() == Int(2), split_transfer, split_close)
)
return split_program
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(compileTeal(split(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=2))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def multi_transaction_contract():
check_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(3)
validate_txn_0 = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
validate_txn_1 = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].asset_amount() > Int(0),
)
validate_txn_2 = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].xfer_asset(),
Gtxn[2].asset_amount() >= Int(10),
)
check_recipients = And(
Gtxn[0].receiver() != Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].asset_receiver() != Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].asset_receiver() != Global.zero_address(),
)
check_rounds = Gtxn[0].first_valid() >= Int(2000)
program_logic = And(
check_group_size,
validate_txn_0,
validate_txn_1,
validate_txn_2,
check_recipients,
check_rounds,
)
return program_logic
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(compileTeal(multi_transaction_contract(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=2))
* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def signature_contract():
allowed_receiver = Addr("PC23WQD64NGWOQCJXX75TMILAUIMBSP2LJ5IYL2KUUTUSXTCEQPACDRCNQ")
max_transfer_amount = Int(1000000)
min_round = Int(1000)
max_round = Int(2000)
max_fee = Int(1000)
check_receiver = Txn.receiver() == allowed_receiver
check_amount = Txn.amount() <= max_transfer_amount
check_time = And(
Global.round() >= min_round,
Global.round() <= max_round
)
check_type = Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment
check_close_rem_to = Txn.close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address()
check_fee = Txn.fee() <= max_fee
check_rekey_to = Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
program = And(
check_receiver,
check_amount,
check_time,
check_type,
check_close_rem_to,
check_fee,
check_rekey_to
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
with open("signature_contract.teal", "w") as f:
f.write(compileTeal(signature_contract(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=5))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def messy_contract():
group_size_check = Global.group_size() == Int(4)
txn0 = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].application_args[0] == Bytes("create"),
Gtxn[0].application_id() == Int(0),
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(2000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn1 = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].amount() >= Int(1000000),
Gtxn[1].receiver() == Addr("FGYRVJW5NGKPV2WT4LLZCUKH4UULRCBZUCKAEUONEWI3HLTMZSKW5MZBYA"),
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[1].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn2 = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[2].asset_receiver() == Addr("DV4UE2MIVDIZOQOSZHFCFU3FZJRNUQDQWBCZO4HB4OBZNXXPY3FEGIA54Y"),
Gtxn[2].asset_amount() >= Int(200),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(1200)
)
txn3 = And(
Gtxn[3].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[3].application_args[0] == Bytes("finalize"),
Gtxn[3].application_id() == Int(1),
Gtxn[3].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[3].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
program = And(
txn0,
txn1,
txn2,
txn3,
group_size_check
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(compileTeal(messy_contract(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=2))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
tmpl_receiver = Addr("QKM5U5CZHVJOPVEKPIKYUWTKSV4BAMOA25OVHIBUPNM7INZHF327ELXZIY")
tmpl_secondary_receiver = Addr("3CK2NUOOM5DFSGTTBOMXCQLTKG5T3Y37D67ALV6ONGFRBMKXGEJBLVZWYU")
tmpl_amount = Int(100000)
tmpl_lease = Bytes("base64", "dGhpcyBpcyBhIHRlc3QgbGVhc2U=")
tmpl_timeout = Int(60000)
def complex_unchecked_fee():
group_size_check = Global.group_size() == Int(2)
primary_transfer = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].receiver() == tmpl_receiver,
Gtxn[0].amount() == tmpl_amount,
Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].lease() == tmpl_lease,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(100),
)
secondary_transfer = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].receiver() == tmpl_secondary_receiver,
Gtxn[1].amount() <= tmpl_amount / Int(2),
Gtxn[1].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(100),
)
program = And(
group_size_check,
primary_transfer,
secondary_transfer,
Global.latest_timestamp() <= tmpl_timeout,
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(compileTeal(complex_unchecked_fee(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=5))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def group_signature_contract():
allowed_payment_receiver = Addr("INAU7ZVVVZXRCCJIWSIOR2QZDP2OTDBF5RWZLML4UWRWNFBB27CEBDSFPE")
allowed_asset_receiver = Addr("FYWOYJKF3HHK2RU4O3TEDFDK55CTA6MBG3ZBHXZJ5M44KPEENDAD7PMCIQ")
max_fee = Int(1000)
max_payment_amount = Int(2000000)
max_asset_amount = Int(5000)
check_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(4)
first_txn = Gtxn[0]
check_first_txn = And(
first_txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
first_txn.receiver() == allowed_payment_receiver,
first_txn.amount() <= max_payment_amount,
first_txn.fee() <= max_fee,
first_txn.close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
first_txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
second_txn = Gtxn[1]
check_second_txn = And(
second_txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
second_txn.receiver() == allowed_payment_receiver,
second_txn.amount() <= max_payment_amount,
second_txn.fee() <= max_fee,
second_txn.close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
second_txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
third_txn = Gtxn[2]
check_third_txn = And(
third_txn.type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
third_txn.asset_receiver() == allowed_asset_receiver,
third_txn.asset_amount() <= max_asset_amount,
third_txn.fee() <= max_fee,
third_txn.asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
third_txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
fourth_txn = Gtxn[3]
check_fourth_txn = And(
fourth_txn.type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
fourth_txn.asset_receiver() == allowed_asset_receiver,
fourth_txn.asset_amount() <= max_asset_amount,
fourth_txn.fee() <= max_fee,
fourth_txn.asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
fourth_txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
program = And(
check_group_size,
check_first_txn,
check_second_txn,
check_third_txn,
check_fourth_txn
)
return program
if __name__ == "__main__":
with open("approval.teal", "w") as f:
f.write(compileTeal(group_signature_contract(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=5))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def basic_asset_transfer():
split_core = And(
Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Txn.fee() < Int(1000),
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
return And(
Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Txn.asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.fee() <= Int(1000),
Txn.close_remainder_to() != Global.zero_address(),
Txn.asset_sender() != Addr("HDYDVCAKZYMZSWMMSAGMELPX7HZOA2Y5I5RWK2S22GOLAXKDRMEMH5A6JM"),
split_core
)
program = compileTeal(basic_asset_transfer(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=2)
print(program)* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def verbose_asset_transfer_contract():
unused_variable_1 = Int(42)
group_size_valid = Global.group_size() == Int(2)
first_payment_txn_checks = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0),
Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Or(
Gtxn[0].receiver() != Global.creator_address(),
unused_variable_1 == Int(42),
),
)
program_logic = And(
group_size_valid,
first_payment_txn_checks,
)
return program_logic
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(compileTeal(verbose_asset_transfer_contract(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=5))* [/INST] No, it does not contain any vulnerabilities. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def group_transaction_logic():
group_size_check = Global.group_size() == Int(3)
txn_0 = Gtxn[0]
txn_1 = Gtxn[1]
txn_2 = Gtxn[2]
txn_0_is_payment = txn_0.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment
txn_1_is_payment = txn_1.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment
txn_2_is_asset_transfer = txn_2.type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer
txn_0_amount_valid = And(txn_0.amount() > Int(0),
txn_0.fee() == Int(1000),
txn_0.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
txn_0.close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address())
txn_1_amount_valid = And(txn_1.amount() > Int(0),
txn_1.fee() == Int(1000),
txn_1.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
txn_1.close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address())
asset_id_check = And(txn_2.xfer_asset() == Int(12345),
txn_2.fee() == Int(1000),
txn_2.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address())
total_payment_check = (txn_0.amount() + txn_1.amount()) == Int(100000)
valid_group = And(
group_size_check,
txn_0_is_payment,
txn_1_is_payment,
txn_2_is_asset_transfer,
txn_0_amount_valid,
txn_1_amount_valid,
asset_id_check,
total_payment_check
)
return If(valid_group, Approve(), Reject())
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
tmpl_asset_id = Int(555555)
tmpl_fee = Int(1000)
tmpl_receiver_primary = Addr("7VCH45OOZUYOKLMFANHJ6MFTPJH5OMIVXBTTU4EJBCHGLZOWTG537H5A3A")
tmpl_receiver_secondary = Addr("WN4SAHQFAS6XMC2W5K6DD652K4S2C7YAUABCR62OJHQSTZUFHYUPSX2VM4")
tmpl_transfer_amount = Int(4000)
tmpl_threshold = Int(100000)
tmpl_timeout = Int(150000)
def conditional_asset_transfer():
group_check = Global.group_size() == Int(2)
txn_0 = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= tmpl_fee,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == tmpl_asset_id,
Gtxn[0].asset_receiver() == tmpl_receiver_primary,
Gtxn[0].asset_amount() <= tmpl_transfer_amount,
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
txn_1 = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= tmpl_fee,
Gtxn[1].xfer_asset() == tmpl_asset_id,
Gtxn[1].asset_receiver() == tmpl_receiver_primary,
Gtxn[1].asset_amount() <= tmpl_transfer_amount,
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
timeout_close = And(
Global.latest_timestamp() >= tmpl_timeout,
Txn.close_remainder_to() == tmpl_receiver_secondary,
Txn.fee() <= tmpl_fee,
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
program = Or(
And(group_check, txn_0, txn_1),
timeout_close,
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def secure_group_contract():
valid_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(3)
first_txn_checks = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(2000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
second_txn_checks = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(2000),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].xfer_asset() != Int(0),
)
third_txn_checks = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(2000),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
secure_program = And(
valid_group_size,
first_txn_checks,
second_txn_checks,
third_txn_checks,
)
return secure_program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
tmpl_asset_id = Int(123456)
tmpl_receiver = Addr("NJBKQLGABP3HXJK6KJTJLPOYPGIQYI2P5SCLPKSF3GNFR5JUCW2CIOQCX4")
tmpl_fee = Int(1000)
tmpl_amount = Int(5000)
tmpl_timeout = Int(100000)
def unchecked_asset_close_to():
fee_cond = Gtxn[0].fee() <= tmpl_fee
check_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(1)
type_cond = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == tmpl_asset_id,
)
transfer_cond = And(
Gtxn[0].asset_receiver() == tmpl_receiver,
Gtxn[0].asset_amount() == tmpl_amount,
)
extra_cond = And(
Gtxn[0].first_valid() < tmpl_timeout,
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
program = And(
check_group_size,
fee_cond,
type_cond,
transfer_cond,
extra_cond,
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def diversified_asset_transfer_contract():
group_size_check = Global.group_size() == Int(3)
sset_txn_checks_1 = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(2000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() != Int(0),
Gtxn[0].asset_amount() > Int(10),
)
asset_txn_checks = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(2000),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].xfer_asset() != Int(0),
Gtxn[1].asset_amount() > Int(10),
)
second_payment_checks = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].receiver() != Gtxn[0].sender(),
)
program_logic = And(
group_size_check,
sset_txn_checks_1,
asset_txn_checks,
second_payment_checks,
)
return program_logic
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(compileTeal(diversified_asset_transfer_contract(), mode=Mode.Signature))* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def verbose_asset_transfer_contract():
unused_variable_1 = Int(42)
unused_variable_2 = Bytes("Algorand")
group_size_valid = Global.group_size() == Int(3)
first_payment_txn_checks = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0),
Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Or(
Gtxn[0].receiver() != Global.creator_address(),
unused_variable_1 == Int(42),
),
)
redundant_check = Gtxn[1].last_valid() > Int(0)
extra_variable = Gtxn[1].sender()
second_asset_transfer_checks = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(2000),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].xfer_asset() != Int(0),
Gtxn[1].asset_amount() > Int(10),
redundant_check,
)
dummy_variable = Int(999)
third_payment_txn_checks = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].receiver() != Gtxn[1].sender(),
dummy_variable == Int(999),
)
program_logic = And(
group_size_valid,
first_payment_txn_checks,
second_asset_transfer_checks,
third_payment_txn_checks,
UnusedFunction(),
)
return program_logic
def UnusedFunction():
return Int(1)
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(compileTeal(verbose_asset_transfer_contract(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=5))* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
tmpl_fee = Int(1000)
tmpl_receiver_1 = Addr("TBY3RD6WKNJQIWOHRBJB6XWDPADXEPAQK6EXK4NINF6JJWC5KKDH432ZAI")
tmpl_receiver_2 = Addr("DLTKFBTGRDWOPNWWMTQLLNHMMM6QP3ODCOQEVXGYBDIN7MCAVIGQELZSZM")
tmpl_asset_receiver = Addr("VKGNM5J6YXXCBW2JZ7GCS65TZNPOC3ZIX2DV36IUMX5KOZODVOG6MN2QAA")
tmpl_asset_id = Int(123456)
tmpl_amount = Int(5000)
tmpl_timeout = Int(100000)
def grouped_transactions():
check_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(4)
txn_0 = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= tmpl_fee,
Gtxn[0].receiver() == tmpl_receiver_1,
Gtxn[0].amount() == tmpl_amount,
Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
txn_1 = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= tmpl_fee,
Gtxn[1].receiver() == tmpl_receiver_2,
Gtxn[1].amount() == tmpl_amount,
Gtxn[1].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
txn_2 = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[2].fee() <= tmpl_fee,
Gtxn[2].xfer_asset() == tmpl_asset_id,
Gtxn[2].asset_receiver() == tmpl_asset_receiver,
Gtxn[2].asset_amount() == tmpl_amount,
Gtxn[2].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
txn_3 = And(
Gtxn[3].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[3].fee() <= tmpl_fee,
Gtxn[3].xfer_asset() == tmpl_asset_id,
Gtxn[3].asset_receiver() == tmpl_asset_receiver,
Gtxn[3].asset_amount() == tmpl_amount,
Gtxn[3].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
program = And(
check_group_size,
txn_0,
txn_1,
txn_2,
txn_3,
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def secure_group_contract_extended():
group_size_check = Global.group_size() == Int(13)
txn_0_checks = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].amount() <= Int(1000000),
Gtxn[0].receiver() == Addr("XEMH3GGFQBEIWES7ZRGPD6DAHSUKUZIC7JXVOFYROTUYH7QZGU2N6AFSFE"),
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_1_checks = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].amount() <= Int(2000000),
Gtxn[1].receiver() == Addr("XEMH3GGFQBEIWES7ZRGPD6DAHSUKUZIC7JXVOFYROTUYH7QZGU2N6AFSFE"),
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_2_checks = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[2].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[2].asset_amount() <= Int(500000),
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_3_checks = And(
Gtxn[3].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[3].amount() <= Int(1500000),
Gtxn[3].receiver() == Addr("XEMH3GGFQBEIWES7ZRGPD6DAHSUKUZIC7JXVOFYROTUYH7QZGU2N6AFSFE"),
Gtxn[3].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[3].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[3].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_4_checks = And(
Gtxn[4].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[4].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[4].asset_amount() <= Int(750000),
Gtxn[4].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[4].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[4].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_5_checks = And(
Gtxn[5].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[5].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[5].asset_amount() <= Int(750000),
Gtxn[5].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[5].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[5].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_6_checks = And(
Gtxn[6].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[6].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[6].asset_amount() <= Int(750000),
Gtxn[6].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[6].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[6].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_7_checks = And(
Gtxn[7].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[7].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[7].asset_amount() <= Int(750000),
Gtxn[7].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[7].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
txn_8_checks = And(
Gtxn[8].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[8].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[8].asset_amount() <= Int(750000),
Gtxn[8].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[8].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[8].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_9_checks = And(
Gtxn[9].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[9].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[9].asset_amount() <= Int(750000),
Gtxn[9].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[9].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[9].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_10_checks = And(
Gtxn[10].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[10].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[10].asset_amount() <= Int(750000),
Gtxn[10].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[10].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[10].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_11_checks = And(
Gtxn[11].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[11].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[11].asset_amount() <= Int(750000),
Gtxn[11].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[11].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[11].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn_12_checks = And(
Gtxn[12].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[12].asset_receiver() == Addr("KZJ5UELAD65GPFBROL4EWTHCEJPJV5O3LZZKYUAQRWQPAUM6DCLWEDBSZU"),
Gtxn[12].asset_amount() <= Int(750000),
Gtxn[12].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[12].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[12].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
program = And(
group_size_check,
txn_0_checks,
txn_1_checks,
txn_2_checks,
txn_3_checks,
txn_4_checks,
txn_5_checks,
txn_6_checks,
txn_7_checks,
txn_8_checks,
txn_9_checks,
txn_10_checks,
txn_11_checks,
txn_12_checks
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
tmpl_fee = Int(1000)
tmpl_asset_id_1 = Int(111111)
tmpl_asset_id_2 = Int(222222)
tmpl_amount_1 = Int(5000)
tmpl_amount_2 = Int(3000)
tmpl_receiver_1 = Addr("5TWROOV6WRXEM7YQGA2VBN4VNVXSLGMESBZVP3RAYMYXUWZU7EWDB7OBMU")
tmpl_receiver_2 = Addr("BN2R5VU5TF2U7JM4DDYN4UGJBPGO7CMCKAPCRSPAD6KXBJLWP53JCDFLG4")
tmpl_start_time = Int(5000)
tmpl_end_time = Int(10000)
def advanced_two_asset_transfers():
group_check = Global.group_size() == Int(2)
time_check = And(
Global.latest_timestamp() >= tmpl_start_time,
Global.latest_timestamp() <= tmpl_end_time,
)
txn_0 = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= tmpl_fee,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == tmpl_asset_id_1,
Gtxn[0].asset_receiver() == tmpl_receiver_1,
Gtxn[0].asset_amount() == tmpl_amount_1,
Gtxn[0].note() == Bytes("Transfer1"),
Gtxn[0].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
txn_1 = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= tmpl_fee,
Gtxn[1].xfer_asset() == tmpl_asset_id_2,
Gtxn[1].asset_receiver() == tmpl_receiver_2,
If(
Global.latest_timestamp() % Int(2) == Int(0),
Gtxn[1].asset_amount() == tmpl_amount_2,
Gtxn[1].asset_amount() == tmpl_amount_2 + Int(1000),
),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
program = And(
group_check,
time_check,
txn_0,
txn_1,
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def basic_asset_transfer():
return And(
Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Txn.fee() <= Int(1000),
Txn.close_remainder_to() != Global.zero_address(),
Txn.asset_sender() != Addr("HDYDVCAKZYMZSWMMSAGMELPX7HZOA2Y5I5RWK2S22GOLAXKDRMEMH5A6JM"),
)
program = compileTeal(basic_asset_transfer(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=2)
print(program)* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Close To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset close to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate the recipient address for asset close transactions. This ensures that assets are only closed to authorized and intended accounts, preventing unintended transfers or loss of assets. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def asset_transfer_vulnerable():
init = Seq(
Approve()
)
handle_test = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0]
)
),
App.globalPut(Concat( Bytes("user"), Txn.sender()), Int(1000)),
Approve()
])
handle_noop = Seq(
If(
Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("transfer_asset")
).Then(
Seq(
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.accounts[1],
TxnField.xfer_asset: Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]),
TxnField.asset_amount: Btoi(Txn.application_args[2]),
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Approve()
)
).Else(
Reject()
)
)
handle_delete = Seq(
Assert(Txn.sender()== Global.creator_address()),
Approve() )
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), init],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("deposit"), handle_noop],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("withdraw"), handle_test])],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_auction_contract():
admin_addr = Addr("B37SRWKTJXECD5IXELK4KX6U6SBRJJ5WCJIZG5ZP6NEEFOS24TLDA5LIIY")
highest_bid_key = Bytes("highest_bid")
highest_bidder_key = Bytes("highest_bidder")
handle_place_bid = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0]
)
),
App.globalPut(highest_bid_key, Gtxn[0].asset_amount()),
App.globalPut(highest_bidder_key, Gtxn[0].sender()),
Approve()
])
handle_close_auction = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(highest_bidder_key)),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.asset_amount: App.globalGet(highest_bid_key),
TxnField.xfer_asset: Txn.assets[0],
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Approve()
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == admin_addr),
Approve()
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("place_bid"), handle_place_bid],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("close_auction"), handle_close_auction]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def unchecked_asset_receiver_contract():
balance_key = Bytes("balance")
handle_deposit = Seq(
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0]
)
),
App.globalPut(balance_key, App.globalGet(balance_key) + Gtxn[0].asset_amount()),
Approve()
)
handle_delete = Seq(
Assert(Txn.sender()==Global.creator_address()),
Approve()
)
handle_withdraw = Seq(
Assert(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1)
),
If(
App.globalGet(balance_key) >= Int(1000),
Seq(
App.globalPut(balance_key, App.globalGet(balance_key) - Int(1000)),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.asset_amount: Int(1000),
TxnField.xfer_asset: Txn.assets[0],
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Approve()
),
Reject()
)
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("deposit"), handle_deposit],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("withdraw"), handle_withdraw]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def unchecked_asset_receiver_donation():
total_donations_key = Bytes("total_donations")
on_create = Seq([
App.globalPut(total_donations_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
on_donate = Seq([
Assert(Global.group_size() == Int(2)),
Assert(Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer),
App.globalPut(total_donations_key, App.globalGet(total_donations_key) + Gtxn[0].asset_amount()),
Approve()
])
on_query_donations = Seq([
Log(Itob(App.globalGet(total_donations_key))),
Approve()
])
handle_noop = Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("donate"), on_donate],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("query"), on_query_donations]
)
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), on_create],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, handle_noop]
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_subscription_contract():
subscription_fee = Int(1000)
user_key = Bytes("user")
handle_subscription = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0]
)
),
App.globalPut(Concat(user_key, Txn.sender()), subscription_fee),
Approve()
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("subscribe"), handle_subscription]
)],
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def donation_tracking_contract():
min_donation = Int(500)
donor_key = Bytes("donor")
handle_donation = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0],
Gtxn[0].asset_amount() >= min_donation
)
),
App.globalPut(Concat(donor_key, Txn.sender()), Gtxn[0].asset_amount()),
Approve()
])
handle_check_donations = Seq([
Assert(Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1)),
Return(App.globalGet(Concat(donor_key, Txn.sender())) > Int(0))
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("donate"), handle_donation],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("check_donation"), handle_check_donations]
)],
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def crowdfunding_contract():
campaign_creator = Bytes("creator")
campaign_goal = Bytes("goal")
campaign_balance = Bytes("balance")
admin = Bytes("HSOGKZYRHD3YTDYCWW2HV2JZSVP4YV6EHYEQJOJPTKCZMZK34ZVJ23DRTI")
handle_create_campaign = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(3),
Btoi(Txn.application_args[2]) > Int(0)
)
),
App.globalPut(campaign_creator, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(campaign_goal, Btoi(Txn.application_args[2])),
App.globalPut(campaign_balance, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_contribute = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[0].receiver() == admin,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0],
)
),
App.globalPut(campaign_balance, App.globalGet(campaign_balance) + Gtxn[0].asset_amount()),
Approve()
])
handle_withdraw = Seq([
Assert(
Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(campaign_creator)
),
If(
App.globalGet(campaign_balance) >= App.globalGet(campaign_goal),
Seq([
App.globalPut(campaign_balance, Int(0)),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.asset_amount: App.globalGet(campaign_goal),
TxnField.xfer_asset: Txn.assets[0],
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
Approve()
]),
Reject()
)
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Approve()
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("create"), handle_create_campaign],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("contribute"), handle_contribute],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("withdraw"), handle_withdraw]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_loyalty_contract():
admin_addr = Addr("XAR6M3NLWXUZKXIV4AVFKSCZCFH6GWY2DXT67DGDTD7WDUD5PMHFJDL2RI")
points_key = Bytes("points")
handle_add_points = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0]
)
),
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), points_key, App.localGet(Txn.sender(), points_key) + Gtxn[0].asset_amount()),
Approve()
])
handle_redeem_points = Seq([
App.localPut(Txn.sender(), points_key, App.localGet(Txn.sender(), points_key) - Int(10)),
Approve()
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == admin_addr),
Approve()
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("add_points"), handle_add_points],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("redeem_points"), handle_redeem_points]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def voting_contract():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
voting_creator_key = Bytes("creator")
voting_topic_key = Bytes("topic")
votes_option_a_key = Bytes("option_a")
votes_option_b_key = Bytes("option_b")
voting_active_key = Bytes("active")
handle_create_voting = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(3),
App.globalGet(voting_active_key) == Int(0),
)
),
App.globalPut(voting_creator_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(voting_topic_key, Txn.application_args[1]),
App.globalPut(votes_option_a_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(votes_option_b_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(voting_active_key, Int(1)),
Approve()
])
handle_vote = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2),
App.globalGet(voting_active_key) == Int(1),
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0],
Gtxn[0].asset_amount() > Int(0)
)
),
If(
Txn.application_args[1] == Bytes("option_a"),
App.globalPut(votes_option_a_key, App.globalGet(votes_option_a_key) + Gtxn[0].asset_amount()),
If(
Txn.application_args[1] == Bytes("option_b"),
App.globalPut(votes_option_b_key, App.globalGet(votes_option_b_key) + Gtxn[0].asset_amount()),
Reject()
)
),
Approve()
])
handle_end_voting = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(voting_creator_key),
App.globalGet(voting_active_key) == Int(1)
)
),
App.globalPut(voting_active_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
Approve()
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("create"), handle_create_voting],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("vote"), handle_vote],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("end"), handle_end_voting]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
import random
def lottery_contract():
admin_key = Bytes("admin")
participants_key = Bytes("participants")
lottery_pool_key = Bytes("pool")
winner_key = Bytes("winner")
lottery_active_key = Bytes("active")
handle_create_lottery = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(1),
App.globalGet(lottery_active_key) == Int(0)
)
),
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
App.globalPut(participants_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(lottery_pool_key, Int(0)),
App.globalPut(winner_key, Bytes("")),
App.globalPut(lottery_active_key, Int(1)),
Approve()
])
handle_participate = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].assets[0],
Gtxn[0].asset_amount() > Int(0),
App.globalGet(lottery_active_key) == Int(1)
)
),
App.globalPut(
participants_key,
App.globalGet(participants_key) + Int(1)
),
App.globalPut(
lottery_pool_key,
App.globalGet(lottery_pool_key) + Gtxn[0].asset_amount()
),
Approve()
])
handle_draw_winner = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key),
App.globalGet(lottery_active_key) == Int(1),
App.globalGet(participants_key) > Int(0)
)
),
App.globalPut(
winner_key,
Sha512_256(Concat(Bytes("seed"), Itob(App.globalGet(participants_key)))),
),
App.globalPut(lottery_active_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_claim_prize = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(winner_key),
App.globalGet(lottery_active_key) == Int(0),
)
),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.AssetTransfer,
TxnField.asset_receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.asset_amount: App.globalGet(lottery_pool_key),
TxnField.xfer_asset: Txn.assets[0],
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
App.globalPut(lottery_pool_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_delete = Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
Approve()
])
program = Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("create"), handle_create_lottery],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("participate"), handle_participate],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("draw"), handle_draw_winner],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("claim"), handle_claim_prize]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, handle_delete]
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Asset Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-105, SWC-106, SWC-114, SWC-115. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked asset receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses before transferring assets. This helps ensure that assets are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
lease_check = Txn.lease() != Bytes("12345678901234567890123456789012")
group_size_check = Global.group_size() == Int(12)
transaction_checks = And(
Gtxn[0].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[1].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[2].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[3].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[3].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[3].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[3].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[4].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[4].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[4].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[4].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[5].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[5].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[5].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[5].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[6].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[6].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[6].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[6].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[7].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[7].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[7].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[7].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[8].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[8].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[8].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[8].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[9].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[9].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[9].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[10].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[10].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[10].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[10].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[11].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[11].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[11].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[11].fee() == Int(1000),
)
return If(And(lease_check, group_size_check, transaction_checks), Int(13), Int(0))
def clear_state_program():
return Int(1)
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *
from pyteal import *
tmpl_fee = Int(1000)
tmpl_rcv1 = Addr("6ZHGHH5Z5CTPCF5WCESXMGRSVK7QJETR63M3NY5FJCUYDHO57VTCMJOBGY")
tmpl_rcv2 = Addr("7Z5PWO2C6LFNQFGHWKSK5H47IQP5OJW2M3HA2QPXTY3WTNP5NU2MHBW27M")
tmpl_own = Addr("5MK5NGBRT5RL6IGUSYDIX5P7TNNZKRVXKT6FGVI6UVK6IZAWTYQGE4RZIQ")
tmpl_ratn = Int(1)
tmpl_ratd = Int(3)
tmpl_min_pay = Int(1000)
tmpl_timeout = Int(3000)
def split(
tmpl_fee=tmpl_fee,
tmpl_rcv1=tmpl_rcv1,
tmpl_rcv2=tmpl_rcv2,
tmpl_ratn=tmpl_ratn,
tmpl_ratd=tmpl_ratd,
tmpl_min_pay=tmpl_min_pay,
tmpl_timeout=tmpl_timeout,
):
split_core = And(
Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Txn.fee() < tmpl_fee,
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
split_transfer = And(
Gtxn[0].sender() == Gtxn[1].sender(),
Gtxn[0].receiver() == tmpl_rcv1,
Gtxn[1].receiver() == tmpl_rcv2,
Gtxn[0].amount()
== ((Gtxn[0].amount() + Gtxn[1].amount()) * tmpl_ratn) / tmpl_ratd,
Gtxn[0].amount() == tmpl_min_pay,
)
split_close = And(
Txn.receiver() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.amount() == Int(0),
Txn.first_valid() > tmpl_timeout,
)
split_program = And(
split_core, If(Global.group_size() == Int(2), split_transfer, split_close)
)
return split_program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_close_remainder_contract():
group_size_check = Global.group_size() == Int(2)
txn_0_checks = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].application_id() == Int(0),
Gtxn[0].application_args[0] == Bytes("initialize_subscription"),
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
txn_1_checks = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].amount() == Int(1000000),
Gtxn[1].receiver() == Addr("UWPTP3D7KIILCG7GI3OKPJIB4GIJ4V3UVJO6EHUXO5SPIQVA2YE4PF47JQ"),
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
program = And(
group_size_check,
txn_0_checks,
txn_1_checks
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def group_contract():
group_size_check = Global.group_size() == Int(3)
txn_0_checks = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
txn_1_checks = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
txn_2_checks = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
program = And(
group_size_check,
txn_0_checks,
txn_1_checks,
txn_2_checks,
)
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *
from pyteal import *
tmpl_fee = Int(1000)
tmpl_period = Int(50)
tmpl_dur = Int(5000)
tmpl_lease = Bytes("base64", "023sdDE2")
tmpl_amt = Int(2000)
tmpl_rcv = Addr("6ZHGHH5Z5CTPCF5WCESXMGRSVK7QJETR63M3NY5FJCUYDHO57VTCMJOBGY")
tmpl_timeout = Int(30000)
def periodic_payment(
tmpl_fee=tmpl_fee,
tmpl_period=tmpl_period,
tmpl_dur=tmpl_dur,
tmpl_lease=tmpl_lease,
tmpl_amt=tmpl_amt,
tmpl_rcv=tmpl_rcv,
tmpl_timeout=tmpl_timeout,
):
periodic_pay_core = And(
Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Txn.fee() < tmpl_fee,
Txn.first_valid() % tmpl_period == Int(0),
Txn.last_valid() == tmpl_dur + Txn.first_valid(),
Txn.lease() == tmpl_lease,
)
periodic_pay_transfer = And(
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.receiver() == tmpl_rcv,
Txn.amount() == tmpl_amt,
)
periodic_pay_close = And(
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.receiver() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.first_valid() == tmpl_timeout,
Txn.amount() == Int(0),
)
periodic_pay_escrow = periodic_pay_core.And(
periodic_pay_transfer.Or(periodic_pay_close)
)
return periodic_pay_escrow
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *
from pyteal import *
tmpl_fee = Int(1000)
tmpl_rcv1 = Addr("6ZHGHH5Z5CTPCF5WCESXMGRSVK7QJETR63M3NY5FJCUYDHO57VTCMJOBGY")
tmpl_rcv2 = Addr("7Z5PWO2C6LFNQFGHWKSK5H47IQP5OJW2M3HA2QPXTY3WTNP5NU2MHBW27M")
tmpl_own = Addr("5MK5NGBRT5RL6IGUSYDIX5P7TNNZKRVXKT6FGVI6UVK6IZAWTYQGE4RZIQ")
tmpl_ratn = Int(1)
tmpl_ratd = Int(3)
tmpl_min_pay = Int(1000)
tmpl_timeout = Int(3000)
def split(
tmpl_fee=tmpl_fee,
tmpl_rcv1=tmpl_rcv1,
tmpl_rcv2=tmpl_rcv2,
tmpl_own=tmpl_own,
tmpl_ratn=tmpl_ratn,
tmpl_ratd=tmpl_ratd,
tmpl_min_pay=tmpl_min_pay,
tmpl_timeout=tmpl_timeout,
):
split_core = And(
Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Txn.fee() < tmpl_fee,
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
split_transfer = And(
Gtxn[0].sender() == Gtxn[1].sender(),
Txn.close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].receiver() == tmpl_rcv1,
Gtxn[1].receiver() == tmpl_rcv2,
Gtxn[0].amount()
== ((Gtxn[0].amount() + Gtxn[1].amount()) * tmpl_ratn) / tmpl_ratd,
Gtxn[0].amount() == tmpl_min_pay,
)
split_close = And(
Txn.receiver() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.amount() == Int(0),
Txn.first_valid() > tmpl_timeout,
)
split_program = And(
split_core, If(Global.group_size() == Int(2), split_transfer, split_close)
)
return split_program
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(compileTeal(split(), mode=Mode.Signature, version=2))* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def approval_program():
lease_check = Txn.lease() != Bytes("12345678901234567890123456789012")
group_size_check = Global.group_size() == Int(12)
def validate_payment(index):
return And(
Gtxn[index].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[index].fee() == Int(1000),
Gtxn[index].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
transaction_checks = And(
validate_payment(0),
validate_payment(1),
validate_payment(2),
validate_payment(3),
validate_payment(4),
validate_payment(5),
validate_payment(6),
validate_payment(7),
validate_payment(8),
validate_payment(9),
validate_payment(10),
validate_payment(11),
)
return If(And(lease_check, group_size_check, transaction_checks), Int(1), Int(0))
def clear_state_program():
return Int(1)
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
max_fee = Int(2000)
receiver_a = Addr("APWGQ7IHSSL47G3URNQN3KBBWVXRIURRCTV6NPV3PBC26Z5ENFOGM5HFDM")
receiver_b = Addr("MS4NW6237YFU4HMTIVZLZJSLAYHPO45LGP7DG3TUGFV3QLIKIPYJIJ5KDM")
contract_owner = Addr("BOQDCXSO4II74PT3MUEE4XYSFPNBJVMZ3H2S5CNFBY7HRYXC6XNYLHMRGY")
share_a = Int(2)
share_b = Int(3)
min_amount_a = Int(500)
min_amount_b = Int(800)
expiration_round = Int(4000)
def custom_split_payment():
base_check = And(
Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Txn.fee() <= max_fee,
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
group_transfer = And(
Global.group_size() == Int(2),
Gtxn[0].sender() == Gtxn[1].sender(),
Gtxn[0].receiver() == receiver_a,
Gtxn[1].receiver() == receiver_b,
Gtxn[0].amount() >= min_amount_a,
Gtxn[1].amount() >= min_amount_b,
Gtxn[0].amount() * share_b == Gtxn[1].amount() * share_a,
Gtxn[1].close_remainder_to() == Global.zero_address(),
)
timeout_close = And(
Txn.first_valid() > expiration_round,
Txn.close_remainder_to() == contract_owner,
Txn.receiver() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.amount() == Int(0),
)
program_logic = And(
base_check,
If(Global.group_size() == Int(2), group_transfer, timeout_close),
)
return program_logic
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *
from pyteal import *
tmpl_fee = Int(1000)
tmpl_period = Int(50)
tmpl_dur = Int(5000)
tmpl_lease = Bytes("base64", "023sdDE2")
tmpl_amt = Int(2000)
tmpl_rcv = Addr("6ZHGHH5Z5CTPCF5WCESXMGRSVK7QJETR63M3NY5FJCUYDHO57VTCMJOBGY")
tmpl_timeout = Int(30000)
def periodic_payment(
tmpl_fee=tmpl_fee,
tmpl_period=tmpl_period,
tmpl_dur=tmpl_dur,
tmpl_lease=tmpl_lease,
tmpl_amt=tmpl_amt,
tmpl_rcv=tmpl_rcv,
tmpl_timeout=tmpl_timeout,
):
periodic_pay_core = And(
Txn.type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Txn.fee() < tmpl_fee,
Txn.first_valid() % tmpl_period == Int(0),
Txn.last_valid() == tmpl_dur + Txn.first_valid(),
Txn.lease() == tmpl_lease,
)
periodic_pay_transfer = And(
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.receiver() == tmpl_rcv,
Txn.amount() == tmpl_amt,
)
periodic_pay_close = And(
Txn.rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.receiver() == Global.zero_address(),
Txn.first_valid() == tmpl_timeout,
Txn.amount() == Int(0),
)
periodic_pay_escrow = periodic_pay_core.And(
periodic_pay_transfer.Or(periodic_pay_close)
)
return periodic_pay_escrow* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def multi_transaction_contract():
check_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(3)
validate_txn_0 = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[0].amount() >= Int(1000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(1000)
)
validate_txn_1 = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].asset_amount() > Int(0),
)
validate_txn_2 = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].xfer_asset() == Gtxn[1].xfer_asset(),
Gtxn[2].asset_amount() >= Int(10),
)
check_recipients = And(
Gtxn[0].receiver() != Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[1].asset_receiver() != Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].asset_receiver() != Global.zero_address(),
)
check_rounds = Gtxn[0].first_valid() >= Int(2000)
program_logic = And(
check_group_size,
validate_txn_0,
validate_txn_1,
validate_txn_2,
check_recipients,
check_rounds,
)
return program_logic* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def messy_contract():
check_group_size = Global.group_size() == Int(4)
txn0 = And(
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].application_args[0] == Bytes("create"),
Gtxn[0].application_id() == Int(0),
Gtxn[0].fee() <= Int(2000),
Gtxn[0].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn1 = And(
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].amount() >= Int(1000000),
Gtxn[1].receiver() == Addr("FGYRVJW5NGKPV2WT4LLZCUKH4UULRCBZUCKAEUONEWI3HLTMZSKW5MZBYA"),
Gtxn[1].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[1].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
txn2 = And(
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.AssetTransfer,
Gtxn[2].asset_receiver() == Addr("DV4UE2MIVDIZOQOSZHFCFU3FZJRNUQDQWBCZO4HB4OBZNXXPY3FEGIA54Y"),
Gtxn[2].asset_amount() >= Int(200),
Gtxn[2].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].asset_close_to() == Global.zero_address(),
Gtxn[2].fee() <= Int(1200)
)
txn3 = And(
Gtxn[3].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[3].application_args[0] == Bytes("finalize"),
Gtxn[3].application_id() == Int(1),
Gtxn[3].fee() <= Int(1000),
Gtxn[3].rekey_to() == Global.zero_address()
)
program = And(
check_group_size,
txn0,
txn1,
txn2,
txn3
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Close Remainder To.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-107. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked close remainder to vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient address in close reminder transactions. This ensures that the reminder is only sent to the intended and authorized address, preventing potential misuse or unintended actions. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def simple_loan_contract():
loan_key = Bytes("loan_amount")
request_key = Bytes("request_amount")
admin_addr = Addr("F2CLG5KVJ3I62KOURJGU2NIPJKVHROAV6UKGFX7BQWHLMH7CTVSOEGUFI4")
handle_request = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall
)
),
App.globalPut(request_key, App.globalGet(request_key) + Gtxn[0].amount()),
Approve()
])
handle_approval = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.sender() == admin_addr,
App.globalGet(request_key) > Int(0)
)
),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.Payment,
TxnField.receiver: Txn.accounts[1],
TxnField.amount: App.globalGet(request_key),
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
App.globalPut(loan_key, App.globalGet(request_key)),
App.globalPut(request_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
handle_rejection = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.sender() == admin_addr,
App.globalGet(request_key) > Int(0)
)
),
App.globalPut(request_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
program = Seq(
Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("request_loan"), handle_request],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("approve_loan"), handle_approval],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("reject_loan"), handle_rejection]
)]
),
Reject()
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Payment Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-113. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked payment receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses for payment transactions. This ensures that payments are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_subscription_contract():
sub_key = Bytes("total_subscriptions")
admin_key = Bytes("admin_address")
initialize_application = Seq([
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
Approve()
])
subscribe = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0),
)
),
App.globalPut(sub_key, App.globalGet(sub_key) + Gtxn[0].amount()),
Approve()
])
unsubscribe = Seq([
Assert(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2),
),
If(
Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]) <= App.globalGet(sub_key),
Seq([
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.Payment,
TxnField.receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.amount: Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]),
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
App.globalPut(sub_key, App.globalGet(sub_key) - Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
]),
Reject()
),
Approve()
])
program = Seq([
Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), initialize_application],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("subscribe"), subscribe],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("unsubscribe"), unsubscribe]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
Approve()
])]
),
Approve()
])
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Payment Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-113. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked payment receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses for payment transactions. This ensures that payments are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def auction_contract():
auction_key = Bytes("highest_bid")
auctioneer = Addr("F2CLG5KVJ3I62KOURJGU2NIPJKVHROAV6UKGFX7BQWHLMH7CTVSOEGUFI4")
end_auction = Bytes("end_auction")
winner = Bytes("winner")
handle_bid = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].amount() > App.globalGet(auction_key)
)
),
App.globalPut(auction_key, Gtxn[0].amount()),
App.globalPut(winner, Gtxn[0].sender()),
Approve()
])
handle_end_auction = Seq([
Assert(
Txn.sender() == auctioneer,
App.globalGet(auction_key) > Int(0)
),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.Payment,
TxnField.receiver: App.globalGet(winner),
TxnField.amount: App.globalGet(auction_key),
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
App.globalPut(auction_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
program = Seq(
Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("bid"), handle_bid],
[Txn.application_args[0] == end_auction, handle_end_auction]
)],
),
Reject()
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Payment Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-113. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked payment receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses for payment transactions. This ensures that payments are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_bug_bounty_contract():
bounty_key = Bytes("total_bounty")
admin_key = Bytes("admin_address")
init_application = Seq([
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
Approve()
])
handle_bug_report = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0)
)
),
App.globalPut(bounty_key, App.globalGet(bounty_key) + Gtxn[0].amount()),
Approve()
])
handle_bounty_claim = Seq([
Assert(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2)
),
If(
Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]) <= App.globalGet(bounty_key),
Seq([
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.Payment,
TxnField.receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.amount: Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]),
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
App.globalPut(bounty_key, App.globalGet(bounty_key) - Btoi(Txn.application_args[1])),
]),
Reject()
),
Approve()
])
program = Seq([
Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), init_application],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("report_bug"), handle_bug_report],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("claim_bounty"), handle_bounty_claim]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
Approve()
])]
),
Approve()
])
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Payment Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-113. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked payment receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses for payment transactions. This ensures that payments are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def auction_contract():
auction_key = Bytes("highest_bid")
auctioneer = Addr("F2CLG5KVJ3I62KOURJGU2NIPJKVHROAV6UKGFX7BQWHLMH7CTVSOEGUFI4")
end_auction = Bytes("end_auction")
winner = Bytes("winner")
handle_bid = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(4),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[2].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[3].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].amount() > App.globalGet(auction_key)
)
),
App.globalPut(auction_key, Gtxn[0].amount()),
App.globalPut(winner, Gtxn[0].sender()),
Approve()
])
handle_end_auction = Seq([
Assert(
Txn.sender() == auctioneer,
App.globalGet(auction_key) > Int(0)
),
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.Payment,
TxnField.receiver: App.globalGet(winner),
TxnField.amount: App.globalGet(auction_key),
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
App.globalPut(auction_key, Int(0)),
Approve()
])
program = Seq(
Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), Approve()],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("bid"), handle_bid],
[Txn.application_args[0] == end_auction, handle_end_auction]
)],
),
Reject()
)
return program* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Payment Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-113. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked payment receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses for payment transactions. This ensures that payments are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
<<SYS>> You are a smart contract security analyze. You receive smart contract written in PyTEAL as input and answer with the vulnerability identified if exist. The vulnerabilities are classified according to Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC). You can also offer remediations to vulnerabilities found, only if the user ask you. <</SYS>> <s> [INST] Can you check if the following smart contract written in PyTEAL contains a vulnerability? *from pyteal import *
def vulnerable_ticketing_contract():
ticket_key = Bytes("total_tickets")
admin_key = Bytes("admin_address")
init_application = Seq([
App.globalPut(admin_key, Txn.sender()),
Approve()
])
handle_ticket_purchase = Seq([
Assert(
And(
Txn.group_index() == Int(1),
Gtxn[0].type_enum() == TxnType.Payment,
Gtxn[1].type_enum() == TxnType.ApplicationCall,
Gtxn[0].amount() > Int(0)
)
),
App.globalPut(ticket_key, App.globalGet(ticket_key) + (Gtxn[0].amount() / Int(100))),
Approve()
])
handle_ticket_refund = Seq([
Assert(
Txn.application_args.length() == Int(2)
),
If(
Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]) <= App.globalGet(ticket_key),
Seq([
InnerTxnBuilder.Begin(),
InnerTxnBuilder.SetFields({
TxnField.type_enum: TxnType.Payment,
TxnField.receiver: Txn.sender(),
TxnField.amount: Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]) * Int(100),
}),
InnerTxnBuilder.Submit(),
App.globalPut(ticket_key, App.globalGet(ticket_key) - Btoi(Txn.application_args[1]))
]),
Reject()
),
Approve()
])
program = Seq([
Cond(
[Txn.application_id() == Int(0), init_application],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.NoOp, Cond(
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("purchase_ticket"), handle_ticket_purchase],
[Txn.application_args[0] == Bytes("refund_ticket"), handle_ticket_refund]
)],
[Txn.on_completion() == OnComplete.DeleteApplication, Seq([
Assert(Txn.sender() == App.globalGet(admin_key)),
Approve()
])]
),
Approve()
])
return program
* [/INST] Yes, it contains a vulnerability. It is classified as Unchecked Payment Receiver.In SWC it is mapped with: SWC-113. </s><s> [INST] Can you suggest how to mitigate this vulnerability? [/INST] To prevent unchecked payment receiver vulnerabilities in Algorand, it is recommended to validate and verify the recipient addresses for payment transactions. This ensures that payments are only sent to intended and authorized recipients, preventing unauthorized transfers. </s>
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 7