oops, many apologies, this was not meant for this mailinglist. sameer On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Sameer Agarwal wrote: > well for one thing, the notation in your 98 paper is much more consistent > and correct as compared to the notation in the book chapter. Infact you > keep going back and forth between using p and f for the phase function. > Besides that the subscripts for L are also mixed up at a number of places. > > I went through the 98 paper yesterday and that does not have any mistakes > in it. > > sameer > > > > On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote: > > > I am using VC++ 7.1 without having link problems. > > But IIRC someone mentioned problems with pre-compiled header files. > > Could this be related to your difficulties? > > Ralf > > > > --- Mike Rovner <mike at nospam.com> wrote: > > > I'm trying to move my project from VC++ 7.0 to 7.1 > > > There was no problem under 7.0 > > > When linking I got the following: > > > > > > error LNK2005: "class boost::arg<3> `anonymous namespace'::_3" > > > (?_3@?A0x2264d27d@@3V?$arg@$02 at boost@@A) already defined in file1.obj > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > C++-sig mailing list > > C++-sig at python.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > C++-sig mailing list > C++-sig at python.org > >