Marc Slemko wrote:
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 1997, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > > * let's fix the Solaris 2.6 and HPUX getwd junk the right way.
> > > Either get rid of the (one) call to getwd or use ap_getwd and
> > > #define it appropriately in conf.h
> >
> > Ugly to add another new define for all entries in conf.h for one
> > use of a call... If no other alternatives, then we should wrap the
> > HPUX/Sol2.6 stuff (ie: only their entries in conf.h need be
> > adjusted) as needed. I'll look.
>
> The problem is that we will continually have this problem as things
> change, etc. We don't actually have to add a define for all of them, we
> could just add a define for those that currently have one then default to
> #define ap_getwd getwd for the rest.
>
> I think it is a lot better to solve namespace conflicts by renaming things
> than by continually adding special cases.
>
> ...but I think we could get rid of the one getwd extremely easily anyway,
> so that is more worthwhile IMHO...
>
Agreed (getting rid of the call).
--
====================================================================
Jim Jagielski | jaguNET Access Services
jim@jaguNET.com |
"Not the Craw... the CRAW!"