Question: I want to set up a new website where I'm planing to post content from different mystics/spiritual authors(most of them dead). The content is from various sources but most of them from books that I bought from amazon. The important thing is that I'll be posting only particular parts of books (grabbing parts ranging 1-5 pages) per topic. *I wouldn't like to post a reference to the book*. Is this legal? 
I'm wandering because most of these authors which I plan to post died before the age of the internet.

Thanks

Answer: 
I am not a lawyer, but posting 1-5 pages without any commentary on them seems a lot to me. There was this copyright troll [Right Haven](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Righthaven) that would sue even in the case of fair use. Luckily the company is no more.

Any advice on this question would largely depend a lot on where you're from and the local copyright laws there(though it would be a good idea to generally not violate any US copyright laws online).

But in general there are a few things you could do -

1. Check whether the work is in the Public Domain. This could be as easy as checking the copyright notice in the book. In my copy of Calculus Made Easy by Silvanus P Thompson, the copyright notice only covers the cover art design, not the contents of the book. You could also do an online search to check the copyright status of the work.
2. Research fair use laws in your region and try to stick to them.
3. Research the copyright holders of the work and check their litigation record online. This, you should do, if you're paranoid enough, even when you are dead sure you're in the right side of the fair use exemption.
4. And if the work isn't in the public domain, and what you want to do isn't covered by any fair use exemptions, try contacting the copyright holder asking for permission.
Short answer: that's illegal.

Long answer: that's illegal, but how likely do you think it is the copyright holders (not necessarily the authors) will pursue you for copyright infringement?

The tricky bit is if/when you decide to stick ads on your site. Are you making money off their copyrighted intellectual property without any kind of licence in place to compensate them? Is your site a purely hobbyist site with no ads and consistently loss-making? That can sometimes sway a decision.

I would err on the side of caution. It's a civil offence in most places, but it's still a serious one which can carry significantly punitive statutory penalties.

NB: not every country has fair use or commentary laws (UK being a good example), so blogger emptor on all of those. I think the best thing you could do if you are going to include lots of copypasta from published books is at the very least liberally link through to their pages on Amazon etc, with lots of suggestions to buy them.

For me, the tipping point between acceptable and unacceptable when verbatim quoting another source is when you get to about 200 words, but that's purely subjective.