Question: Server using Apache and Plesk 9.

I have set-up multiple domains each with its own IP for SSL. 
Each domain has its own SSL config file **/var/www/vhosts/mydomain/conf/vhost\_ssl.conf**

I have disabled SSLv2 in **/etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf**
and checked it with 

`openssl s_client –ssl2 –connect localhost:443`
result is an error.. which is correct

However when i test the domain to see if SSLv2 is disabled

`openssl s_client –ssl2 –connect mydomain:443`
result is domain has SSLv2 support - not what i want

My question is... Do i have to add lines to /var/www/vhosts/mydomain/conf/vhost\_ssl.conf to disable SSLv2 support for that domain...?

Is yes, do i need to copy the full `<VirtualHost _default_:443>....</VirtualHost>` section form **/etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf** and add it to **/var/www/vhosts/mydomain/conf/vhost\_ssl.conf** ?

Answer: 
I have a lot of understanding for your users. You are doing a fundamental error of system administration: You create a solution that is easy for the sysadmins, but forget the needs and requirements of the users. 200mb per user is simply insane, and it is a limitation that causes problems for them, as they have to bother with archives and backups. This is wasted time and wasted money. The cost of 1gb of storage compared to the time it takes to sort 1gb of emails is extremely bad on the cost/benefit scale. 

Why don't you provide your users with "unlimited" storage space? In practice, it won't grow very fast. It will take away the whole problem with the local archiving when the users no longer need to delete e-mails.

So, what you should be telling your users is "You don't need personal folders anymore. We will store all the e-mails for you, and take care of the backups."
I am one of those users that uses Lotus Notes and have been restricted to 200MB.

1. I know you're talking about Outlook and not Notes, but I need to vent and say that Lotus Notes is horrible (please never implement this); it's horrible to open, use, navigate, and script for. So this is more a precautionary statement, then addressing your question.
2. 200MB is also stupid, especially when you get excel reports that are 3-10MB a piece, or someone wants to add unreduced images/signatures to their emails, or even the common HTML emails. Today the minimum should be 2GB per mailbox, but really somewhere between 5-10GB is suggested. Keep in mind though, people will always use/maximize what they're given. If you give them 10GB, they will eventually use that much and ask for more. On the flip side, 200MB is almost nothing, it's almost equivalent to 10MB, since they're deleting and making space every time they get new mail.

As for Outlook and pst issues, the pst file can be good. The .pst file is used for more than just local storage of emails, it also has:

* Calendar appointments
* To-do list info
* Most importantly: Contacts

I think the local address book (contacts) information is the key thing that people might not want going to a cloud environment. Something you should consider is to synchronize your .pst file with your network profile so that it can be accessed from anywhere.

On the other hand, .pst files do have some bad things, they are:

* often corrupted causing emails and other data to be loss
* reach a critical size of their own (2GB for older ANSI, 20GB for Unicode), which increases the chances of corruption, or other problems with your system
* are not very secure (it's easy to bypass any password measures)
* newer versions (Outlook 2003 and on) are not backward compatible with older version of Outlook, which might be important if you have contingency sites, older desktops, or older laptops that run older version of the software

Here's a more complete [list of all the bads](http://www.archiving101.com/?p=19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------