Question: I have seen the following sentences:

> 
> Es ist besser, nicht den Kopf zu verlieren.
> 
> 
> Hör auf mich zu schlagen.
> 
> 
> 

I would make the first sentence with simpler: *Verlieren* simply means *to lose.* So wouldn’t *den Kopf verlieren* already mean what I need? Why add *zu* here?
The same goes for the second sentence.

What is the rule of thumb to decide when to enter/omit *zu* in these contexts?

Answer: 
There are many uses for the infinitive in German, sometimes with *zu*, sometimes without it. To keep it simple, I sum up the three cases with *zu* for someone who knows English:

First, sometimes when English uses its gerund, which German lacks:

> 
> Zu lesen fällt mir leicht.
> 
> 
> 

*Reading comes easy to me.*

BUT as German speakers adore nouns, the alternative with a noun made from an infinitive is far more common. (Note the caps on *Lesen*.)

> 
> (Das) Lesen fällt mir leicht.
> 
> 
> 

Second, anywhere English uses its to-infinitive:

> 
> Sie gab mir eine deutsche Zeitung zu lesen.
> 
> 
> 

*She gave me a German newspaper to read.*

Third, in a special clause: the **Infinitivsatz**. That clause is a very common replacement for an **Objektsatz** if its subject is identical to that of the main clause.

> 
> **Sie** verbrachte den Nachmittag damit, dass **sie** die Zeitung las. (Objektsatz)
> 
> 
> Sie verbrachte den Nachmittag damit, die Zeitung zu lesen. (Infinitivsatz)
> 
> 
> 

*She spent the afternoon reading the newspaper.*

If you use the *Objektsatz* instead of the *Infinitivsatz*, German speakers would automatically assume the subject has changed and are puzzled if it hasn't.

This third case is uncommon to English speakers but you can easily spot it because it's used in a lot of cases where English uses its to-infinitive or its gerund. See the other two cases, remember you have to place a comma, and –unlike English– it's a clause of its own.
You need to add "zu" in order to complete your thought about losing.

That's because the "infinitive" is "to lose" only in English. German has an infinitive form that ends in "en," verlieren. There is no "to" in that version.

When the German uses zu in "zu verlieren," the context is "in order/not *to lose*." The italicized part is NOT the infinitive "to lose."

The reason is that "to" forms part of the infinitive in English but not in German. In English, you don't need a second "to" for (in order.not) to lose. But in German, you need a "zu" because it was never part of the infinitive.