Question: I have a server with a [`DatagramSocket`](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/net/DatagramSocket.html) bound to the "ANY" wildcard address (using the [`DatagramSocket(int)`](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/net/DatagramSocket.html#DatagramSocket-int-) constructor). This single socket allows the server to listen to UDP messages on multiple addresses, notably both IPv4 and IPv6.

Unfortunately, when sending the response, the server does not always choose as a source address the same address the client sent the request to; the result is an ICMPv6 message destination unreachable, unreachable port.

The same server also binds to the wildcard address for TCP, and never has the wrong source address issue with TCP. [This Linux/C question](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3062205/setting-the-source-ip-for-a-udp-socket) seems to be about the same issue, and one answerer mentions that special handling is "not required for TCP because it handles multihoming transparently".

Is there any way to fix this problem in Java, other than binding a separate `DatagramSocket` for every address?

Answer: 
A .t file is text that contains the automation for your test case written in the 4Test language which is the language that Silk Test Classic, there is nothing to disassemble or decompile.

If you want your test case to be in C# consider using Silk4Net rather than Silk Test Classic.
TL;DR: No.

This feature has been [requested for Visual Test scripts since 2012 (Uservoice)](http://borland.uservoice.com/forums/163510-silk-test-feature-request/suggestions/3117545-silktest-workbench-convert-visual-test-to-net-sc) but never been implemented.

I have asked the question for [4Test scripts (Uservoice)](http://borland.uservoice.com/forums/163510-silk-test-feature-request/suggestions/6125380-converting-silktest-classic-tests-to-silk4j) and got the following response:

> 
> Please get in touch with support, to information about how to migrate from Silk Test Classic to Silk4J.
> 
> 
> 

Unfortunately, the response from MicroFocus support was: "Automatic conversion is not possible. But they can recommend a company which does such a conversion as a service provider".