Question: > 
> **Possible Duplicate:**  
> 
> [Equivalent of “both” when referring three or more items?](https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/22357/equivalent-of-both-when-referring-three-or-more-items) 
> 
> 
> 

Consider this statement:

> 
> Salads are both tasty and delicious.
> 
> 
> 

Is there a natural way to use that construct with more than two adjectives? I can't come up with anything that sounds right to me. Two things that came to my mind were:

> 
> Salads are all three tasty, delicious, and healthy.
> 
> 
> 

* This one doesn't sound natural to me.

> 
> Salads are each tasty, delicious, healthy, and cheap.
> 
> 
> 

* I'm not sure if this is even valid English.

*If someone can come up with a better title for this question, please do (and then remove this comment). Thanks!*

Answer: 
Your sentence would be correct like this: 

> 
> All the salads are tasty, delicious, healthy and cheap.
> 
> 
> 

The use of **all** in the beginning of the sentence ensures that the qualities described by each adjective apply to all the salads.

If you have different types of salads, then you can have a sentence of this style:

> 
> All four types of salads are tasty, delicious, healthy and cheap.
> 
> 
> 

EDIT upon comments: Since you are talking about salads in general, then it should be:

> 
> All salads are tasty, delicious, healthy and cheap.
> 
> 
>
You seem to ask for a way of implying a contrast between adjectives, i.e., healthy vs tasty.

One might say:

"Salads are not only healthy, they are tasty and delicious."

Implying a contrast between three adjectives might use a little italicizing as a hint about how to stress words:

"Not only are salads healthy, they are tasty, *and* they are inexpensive."