Question: <https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/74595/more-realistic-strength-stat>

**Worldbuilding:** It's too RPG-like.  

**RPG:** D&D and reality can't be correlated, as long as the wisdom stat lives.  

**Biology:** But it's for fictional system.

**Where to ask this question?**

Answer: 
No philosophy is prohibited, but there are some things you should keep in mind:

1. Make sure that it is very clear that said philosophy is a philosophy of nation in your world, not yours. If it's also yours or not is irrelevant and best left out altogether.
2. Make sure that this is very clear it's not just one person. This would be story-based, see [Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?](https://meta.worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/3300/49)
3. Make sure you clearly describe how this philosophy relate to the realities of fictional world you are building. Is it reasonable? Or bull excrement? In the fictional world we don't know, not in our real world. 

	* What is this philosophy? How does it work? What it assume?
	* What in-world circumstances created it?
	* Does it have real world analog, and what are the differences?
4. Provide clarifications requested.
5. Assume good faith - people comment to help you recover from bad question. Most of us are not native speakers so sometimes this may sound rough to you, and we have limited time and comment length (and patience), so we aren't always able to put enough "honey" in these comments. Deal with it and read carefully, without prejudice, what flaws in your questions these comments point out. You don't have to agree with them. But if these flaws are causing your question to get downvotes, show some gratitude for insight you got. **Comments on votes are not mandatory**, by commenting people are just trying to make you a favor.

I believe you failed at all these points. 

---

*"Freedom of speech" is not a shield from consequences. We* acknowledge your right to post what you posted. But it's also our freedom of speech to vote it up or down or VTC, as we see fit. Calling it "spam voting" is unjust, you try to have your freedom of expression and at the same time take ours away. 

\* by "we" I mean me and people who posted similar comments under original question(s).
To pretend that all of the votes on your question were purely about the quality of the question is more than a little disingenuous. Honestly I voted the way I did because the premise seemed thin and it made the question "not useful" as far as I was concerned, as I pointed out in the comments.

With that out of the way I would like to say a few things... 

***steps up on his soap box***

People are going to ask questions that in some way involve their personal world view. Some will be offensive to you personally.\* That shouldn't be a reason to close a question out right, and as far as I know it isn't. 

Please take these as opportunities to learn something, I personally learned a lot tonight. I didn't know that MGTOW was a thing and now I do. I don't agree with it or support it, but now I'm aware of it, and maybe being aware of an issue and talking to someone about it makes everyone involved a little better off. 

People learn an awful lot from the stories they read, the games they play, and most essentially the worlds they interact with. If we can make our world a better place, by making our worlds/stories better, by taking the time to talk to someone we disagree with, everyone gains.

Your answer to a question may just change someone's point of view some day.\*\*

\*This is an unfortunate fact of life  

\*\*With great power comes great responsibility... or some such...