Question: While at lunch with my lab group we got into discussion of the different types of scattering phenomenon that we encounter in everyday life and physical experiments. We ended up listing about a dozen or so types of scattering that we see constantly, but I left unfulfilled.

I want to compile a list of scattering phenomenon and a brief description. At the very least this will be helpful for those taking the physics GRE in the near future, otherwise its a good exercise for anyone interested in physics, even those in professional physics.

I'll Begin to give you the basic jist of what I'm looking for, feel free to elaborate on the description as much as you want. An equation is useful if it's easily expressed

**Compton scattering**: Scattering of a photon off of a particle, photon imparts momentum to the particle and loses some of its energy, the change in wavelength is described by 
$$\Delta\_{\lambda} = \frac{h}{mc}(1-\cos{\theta})$$
It is independent of the frequency of the incoming photon and inversely proportional to the mass of the particle scattered from. 

**Raleigh Scattering**: Elastic Scattering of photons off of molecules and other (micro and macro) particles, photons do not lose energy but change direction. Has a strong dependence on frequency and is the reason the sky is blue (and why you can see laser pointer beams in the dark). 

P.S. I don't have the reputation to create tags yet, and there are no tags relevant to this question (big-list scattering) please feel free to retag as necessary

Answer: 
The obvious answer is their mass, accelerating a subatomic particle to relativistic velocity takes many orders of magnitude less energy than accelerating a macroscopic particle.

More subtly, we can only accelerate subatomic particles that we can manipulate with electromagnetic fields, nobody has a proposed viable experiments to study relativistic neutron or neutrino reactions because we really have no way to manipulate them. What this means is that we need relatively light, charged, particles that we can accelerate to relativistic velocity in a reasonable space with reasonable amount of energy.

Which brings us to our next point. Modern accelerators use what are called "RF cavities" to accelerate charged particles like protons and electrons, these are effectively giant pulsed capacitors with the particle flying in the space between the plates. We are governed by material science and the permiativity of the vacuum and have a limit to the maxium voltage we can put across the plates, and hence the maximum energy we can impart to a particle per unit length of the cavity. For modern accelerators this is on the order of 1 MeV per cm. 1 MeV on an electron goes a long way (which is why your TV works). 1 MeV on a baseball barely does anything. If the LHC seems big, an accelerator to collide two baseballs with the same velocity would be wider than the solar system (using modern technology). 

More realistically though, we accelerate particles so we can study the physics during collisions of two particles. When we collide electrons and positrons for instance, nearly 100% of the energy carried by the particle is deposited into the reaction if they collide head on, its this fact that lets us see the creation of new and exotic particles following the collision (And why LEP began seeing Z bosons as soon as they crossed the 180GeV threshold). When we move to the LHC for example, we are colliding two protons- which, roughly speaking are sacks of consisting of 3 quarks. And the momentum (and therefore the energy) of the proton is more or less evenly distributed among the three quarks. So the energy available to us in the collision is actually about 6 times less than an eqiuivalent electron-positron collider. Imagine doing this with a baseball, which is composed of trillions of trillions of particles. The energy that each particle carries is a tiny fraction of the total energy of the baseball, therefore every single collision event only has a tiny fraction of the total energy of the system, and in the end we get no useful reaction out of a collision that could not have just as easily been accomplished by putting two televisions face to face.
The following formula is very self-explained:

$m=\frac{m\_{0}}{\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}}$

So, as an object go faster, its mass increases, and it is more difficult to accelerate it. Mass tends to infinity when you approach to the speed of light. Thus, only massless particles can go so fast!