Question: The [no hair theorem](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hair_theorem) says that a black hole can be characterized by a small number of parameters that are visible from distance - mass, angular momentum and electric charge.

For me it is puzzling why local quantities are not included, i.e. quantum numbers different from electrical charge. Lack of such parameters means breaking of the conservations laws (for a black hole made of baryons, Hawking radiation then is 50% baryonic and 50% anti-baryonic).

The question is:

* If lack of baryonic number as a black hole parameter is a well established relation?

OR

* It is (or may be) only an artifact of lack of unification between QFT and GR?

Answer: 
The no hair theorem is proven in classical gravity, in asymptotically flat 4 dimensional spacetimes, and with particular matter content. When looking at more general circumstances, we are starting to see that variations of the original assumptions give the black hole more hair. For example, for asymptotically AdS one can have scalar hair (a fact which is used to build holographic superconductors). For five dimensional spaces black holes (and black rings) can have dipole moments of gauge charges. Maybe there are more surprises.

But, the basic intuition behind the no hair theorem is still valid. The basic fact used in all these constructions is that when the object falls into a black hole, it can imprint its existence on the black hole exterior only if it associated with a long ranged field. So for example an electron will change the charge of the black hole which means that black hole will have a Coulomb field. You'd be able to measure the total charge by an appropriate Gauss surface. Note that gravity has no conserved local currents (see [this discussion](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/7244/what-is-energy-in-string-theory/7263#7263)), the only thing you'd be able to measure is the *total* charge.

As for baryon number, it is not associated with long ranged force, when it falls into black hole there is nothing to remember that fact, and the baryon number is not conserved. This is just one of the reasons there is a general belief that global charges (those quantities which are not accompanied by long ranged forces) are not really conserved. For the Baryon number we know that for a fact: our world has more baryons than anti baryons, so the observed baryon number symmetry must only be approximate. It must have been violated in the early universe when all baryons were generated (look for a related discussion [here](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/6321/matter-antimatter-asymmetry-in-experiments/6323#6323)), a process which is referred to as baryogenesis.
One way out of this--if you believe that Hawking radiation is real, and that black holes completely evaporate, then:

1) the Hawking radiation violates the positive energy conditions. These are assumptions in the no-hair theorem. So, we don't expect the no-hair theorem to be valid for black holes if Hawking radiation is important.

2) If the evaporation profile evolves in a certain way, you can prevent the formation of a true event horizon, only having an [apparent horizon](http://blog.relativity.livingreviews.org/tag/apparent-horizons/) appear for a finite amount of time. This will enable the information about the input baryon number to escape the black hole. 

But classically, you are right. It is well-established that you lose the information about what you put into the black hole--classically, a black hole formed from neutrino collapse is identical to a black hole formed from the collapse of a neutron star or photons or gravitational waves or whatever.