cluster_labels
int64 0
99
| chunks
stringlengths 7
4.26k
| point_ids
stringlengths 36
36
|
|---|---|---|
3 |
Appendix 16: Wealth Ranking of Households
Parish Name = LOPIIDA WARD. , Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = NO. , No. of villages = 5. , No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = . , Remarks = No wealth ranking carried out No record of work done. 8_, Vote Name = NAPAK DLG. 8_, Parish Name = NASIKE WARD. 8_, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = NO. 8_, No. of villages = 3. 8_, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = . 8_, Remarks = No wealth ranking carried out. No record of work done. 9., Vote Name = NAPAK DLG. 9., Parish Name = SENIOR QUARTERS WARD. 9., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = NO. 9., No. of villages = 5. 9., No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = . 9., Remarks = No wealth ranking carried out. No record of work done. 10., Vote Name = NAPAK DLG. 10., Parish Name = COMPLEX WARD. 10., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = NO. 10., No. of villages = 3. 10., No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = . 10., Remarks = No wealth ranking carried out. No record of work done. , Vote Name = . , Parish Name = . , Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = . , No. of villages = 54. , No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = . , Remarks =
|
91c8806b-9942-47bb-9a2d-c94815aaaac8
|
3 |
Appendix 17: failure to carry out Wealth ranking of households
1., Vote Name = Kabale. 1., Parish Name = Muyebe-Buhara. 1., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No evidence. 1., No. of villages = No evidence. 1., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No evidence. 1., Remarks = No evidence of carrying out wealth ranking. 2., Vote Name = Kabale. 2., Parish Name = Rwene -Buhara. 2., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No evidence. 2., No. of villages = No evidence. 2., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No evidence. 2., Remarks = No evidence of carrying out wealth ranking. 3., Vote Name = Kabale. 3., Parish Name = Karweru /Kafunjo- Buhara. 3., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No evidence. 3., No. of villages = No evidence. 3., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No evidence. 3., Remarks = No evidence of carrying out wealth ranking. 4., Vote Name = Kabale. 4., Parish Name = Buhara- Buhara S/C. 4., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No evidence. 4., No. of villages = No evidence. 4., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No evidence. 4., Remarks = No evidence of carrying out wealth ranking. 5., Vote Name = Kabale. 5., Parish Name = Ntarabana-Buhara. 5., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No evidence. 5., No. of villages = No evidence. 5., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No evidence. 5., Remarks = No evidence of carrying out wealth ranking. 6., Vote Name = Kabale. 6., Parish Name = Kitanga-Buhara. 6., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No evidence. 6., No. of villages = No evidence. 6., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No evidence. 6., Remarks = No evidence of carrying out wealth ranking. 7., Vote
|
b9291283-56fc-4e0c-bb04-a99095d488f5
|
3 |
Appendix 25: Registration of Enterprise groups
1., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 1., Parish Name = Northern
|
216394c0-33d4-4043-8a49-bcd4df1bb94a
|
3 |
Appendix 14: Registration of PDM SACCOs
parish = Kibaruko ward. 19, Nyakariro Bgoma PDM SACCO = Kibaruko ward PDM. 19, Kagamba Charles = Tindyebwa Jackson. 19, yes = Yes. 19, 12/5/23 = . 19, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 19, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 19, No = No. 19, Yes = Yes. 19, No = No. 19, Cattle rearing = coffee. 20, Ntungamo DLG = Ntungamo DLG. 20, Nyakariro parish = Mukinga parish. 20, Nyakariro Bgoma PDM SACCO = Mukinga- Nyabushenyi. 20, Kagamba Charles = Kasaja Sharifu yes. 20, yes = . 20, 12/5/23 = . 20, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 20, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 20, No = No. 20, Yes = Yes. 20, No = No. 20, Cattle rearing = Bean growing. 21, Ntungamo DLG = Ntungamo DLG. 21, Nyakariro parish = Mukinga parish. 21, Nyakariro Bgoma PDM SACCO = Mukinga- Nyabushenyi. 21, Kagamba Charles = Nkabimanya Allen. 21, yes = yes. 21, 12/5/23 = . 21, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 21, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 21, No = No. 21, Yes = Yes. 21, No = No. 21, Cattle rearing = coffee. 22, Ntungamo DLG = Ntungamo DLG. 22, Nyakariro parish = Rwengoma parish. 22, Nyakariro Bgoma PDM SACCO = Rwengoma- Ruhaama PDM SACCO. 22, Kagamba Charles = Atugyeza Asimiin. 22, yes = yes. 22, 12/5/23 = . 22, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 22, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 22, No = No. 22, Yes = Yes. 22, No = No. 22, Cattle rearing = piggery
13
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
|
c4bbfcba-6a33-4665-8223-63d5273e67ef
|
3 |
Appendix 17: Selection and Implementation of Prioritized/Flagship Projects
commo dity list = 0. 6., = NAP AK DLG. 6., = APUNGUR E WARD. 6., = APUNGUR E WARD. 6., SACCO = Produce dealers, sorghum and. 6., the priority commodi ties selected by the = NO. 6., ting flagship projects = 0. 6., = 5. 6., farming enterpri ses = 5. 6., ses are from the priority commo dity list = 0
54
7., = NAP AK DLG. 7., = LOPIIDA WARD. 7., = LOPIIDA WARD. 7., gram growing, piggery, vegetabl e and nursery growing, maize, sunflow er = Buying and selling of cereals, poultry. 7., = NO. 7., = 9. 7., = 15. 7., = 9. 7., = 9. 8., = NAP AK DLG. 8., = NASIKE WARD. 8., = NASIKE WARD. 8., gram growing, piggery, vegetabl e and nursery growing, maize, sunflow er = Bee keeping, sun flower, livestock. 8., = NO. 8., = 7. 8., = 11. 8., = 7. 8., = 7. 9., = NAP AK DLG. 9., = SENIOR QUARTER S WARD. 9., = SENIOR QUARTER S WARD. 9., gram growing, piggery, vegetabl e and nursery growing, maize, sunflow er = piggery Buying and selling of cereals, green gram, groundn uts, sim-. 9., = NO. 9., = 10. 9., = 11. 9., = 10. 9., = 10. 10., = NAP AK DLG. 10., = COMPLEX WARD. 10., = COMPLEX WARD. 10., gram growing, piggery, vegetabl e and nursery growing, maize, sunflow er = Buying and selling of cereals, poultry. 10., = NO. 10., = 10. 10., = 11. 10., = 10. 10., = 10
55
|
041cee2d-da24-4b89-8d20-922d3c2c97a4
|
3 |
Appendix 16: Physical Inspection of Household Project Implementation
6., Mukinga = Kagongi. 6., Mukinga-Nyabushenyi = Kagongi-Rugarama. 6., Busingye Imelidah = Twongirwe Adrine. 6., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 6., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 6., coffee = coffee. 6., well mulched garden with coffee seedlings showing green = Fully ed. 6., Fully implement ed = implement. 7., Mukinga = Kagongi. 7., Mukinga-Nyabushenyi = Kagongi-Rugarama. 7., Busingye Imelidah = Bamwebehire Benon. 7., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 7., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 7., coffee = coffee. 7., well mulched garden with coffee seedlings showing green = farmer standing in front of the her coffee. 7., Fully implement ed = Fully implement ed. 8., Mukinga = Kasana C 11. 8., Mukinga-Nyabushenyi = . 8., Busingye Imelidah = Kamara Vicent. 8., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 8., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 8., coffee = piggery. 8., well mulched garden with coffee seedlings showing green = . 8., Fully implement ed = Fully implement ed
16
10., Kagongi Kagongi = . 10., Buhikire Denes = Kyamanywoha Kadia. 10., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 10., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 10., coffee = piggery. 10., picture showing the farmer in front of the newly planted seedlings Fully implement ed = Fully implement ed. etc, Kagongi Kagongi = . etc, Buhikire Denes = . etc, 1,000,000 = . etc, 1,000,000 = . etc, coffee = . etc, picture showing the farmer in front of the newly planted seedlings Fully implement ed = Farmer admiring the piglets
17
|
7d081bb9-9af0-45a9-aea0-32b4449c9942
|
3 |
Appendix 21: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
Nyamugura Parish, Nyamugura Parish = . Nyamugura Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = . Nyamugura Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Nyamugura Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 35. Kabaleega Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Myaliro Noeline. Kabaleega Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = Chairperson LC II. Kabaleega Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabaleega Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 36. Kabaleega Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Nabukaru Sylivia. Kabaleega Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = Secretary. Kabaleega Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabaleega Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 37. Kabaleega Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Nakyanzi Judith. Kabaleega Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = Women Representative. Kabaleega Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabaleega Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 38. Kabaleega Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Kalya Niclos. Kabaleega Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = PWD'S. Kabaleega Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabaleega Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 39. Kabaleega Parish, Nyamugura Parish = Mutabazi Johnmary. Kabaleega Parish, Buletendwa A. Aloysious = Youth. Kabaleega Parish, Secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action
|
446792f0-ba22-4911-a631-33ed3e427df4
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
code = 927. 139, Entity Name = SerereDLG. 139, No. of priorities = -. 139, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 139, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 139, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 139, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 140, Vote code = 802. 140, Entity Name = AdjumaniDLG. 140, No. of priorities = 17. 140, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 11. 140, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 3. 140, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = 14. 140, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 141, Vote code = 604. 141, Entity Name = Hoimacity. 141, No. of priorities = 14. 141, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 2. 141, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 14. 141, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 141, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 142, Vote code = 710. 142, Entity Name = KapchorwaMC. 142, No. of priorities = -. 142, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 27. 142, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 142, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 142, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 143, Vote code = 881. 143, Entity Name = LuukaDLG. 143, No. of priorities = -. 143, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 143, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 143, No. of priorities not
|
6c83ca24-9411-400f-b972-e9de140d52c2
|
3 |
Appendix 6: Exclusion of parish/wards from PDM
1, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Akoboi Parish. 1, = 67. 1, = Angodingod Parish. 2, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Aleles Parish. 2, = 68. 2, = Atete Parish. 3, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Alukucok Parish. 3, = 69. 3, = Kapujan Parish. 4, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Dadas Parish. 4, = 70. 4, = Kokorio Parish. 5, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Lalei Parish. 5, = 71. 5, = Orimai Parish. 6, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Okokoma Parish. 6, = 72. 6, = Akoboi Parish. 7, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Abela Parish. 7, = 73. 7, = Ariet Parish. 8, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Aboiboi Parish. 8, = 74. 8, = Osuguro Parish. 9, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Abwanget Parish. 9, = 75. 9, = Apapai Town Board. 10, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Ajesai Parish. 10, = 76. 10, = Angisa Parish. 11, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Angorom Parish. 11, = 77. 11, = Kamenu Parish. 12, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Getom Parish. 12, = 78. 12, = Magoro Parish. 13, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Olupe Parish. 13, = 79. 13, = Omasia Parish. 14, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Aliakamer Parish. 14, = 80. 14, = Opeta Parish. 15, Ward/Parish As Per MoLG Data June 2022 = Alogook Parish. 15,
|
b1d950d3-d3b3-41a6-9110-0bc1dc882615
|
3 |
Appendix 14: Failure to select and implement prioritized / flagship projects
1, Vote Name = Namayingo. 1, Parish Name = Dohwe. 1, Name of SACCO = Dohwe Buhemb a PDM SACCO. 1, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Coffee Maize Cassava Beans Piggery. 1, Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties by the LG? = No. 1, How many enterpri ses are impleme nting flagship projects (Enterpr ise grps) = 16. 1, Number of PDM enterpris es = 5. 1, How many of the enterpris es are farming enterpris es = 5. 1, How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list = 2. 2, Vote Name = Namayingo. 2, Parish Name = Bukewa. 2, Name of SACCO = Bukewa Buhemb PDM SACCO. 2, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Poultry Cassava Dairy cattle Maize Fish farming Piggery. 2, Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties by the LG? = No. 2, How many enterpri ses are impleme nting flagship projects (Enterpr ise grps) = 16. 2, Number of PDM enterpris es = . 2, How many of the enterpris es are farming enterpris es = . 2, How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list = . 3, Vote Name = Namayingo. 3, Parish Name = Sinde. 3, Name of SACCO = Sinde Buhemb a PDM SACCO. 3, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Coffee Bananas Maize Piggery Cassava. 3, Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties by the LG? = No. 3, How many enterpri ses are impleme nting flagship projects (Enterpr ise grps) = 12. 3, Number of PDM enterpris es = . 3, How many of the enterpris es are farming enterpris es = . 3, How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list = . 4, Vote Name =
|
4c60c75d-d98c-476a-b250-9ab850a6508a
|
3 |
Appendix VI: Automatic promotion policy
, Name of school = BIGANDO P.S:.. , District = Masindi Municipal Council. , Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 2, Name of school = BYARUHA CHURCH SCHOOL. 2, District = Isingiro District. 2, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 3, Name of school = GOT LEMBE P S. 3, District = Nebbi District. 3, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 4, Name of school = Haibaale P.S.. 4, District = Fort-Portal city. 4, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 5, Name of school = JAMULA P.S. 5, District = Lamwo District. 5, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 6, Name of school = Junction Primary School. 6, District = Kabale Municipal Council. 6, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. , Name of school = KABALYE SETTLEMENT P S.. , District = Masindi Municipal Council. , Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 8, Name of school = KASHOJWA. 8, District = Kanungu District. 8, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 9, Name of school = KATASENYWA P.S.. 9, District = Masindi Municipal Council. 9, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 10, Name of school = KINYIMI PS.. 10, District = Sheema District. 10, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 11, Name of school = Mijale Primary School. 11, District = Yumbe District. 11, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 12, Name of school = St. Francis Primary school. 12, District = Soroti City. 12, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Automatic promotion. 13, Name of school = AMUSIA P.S. 13, District = Katakwi District. 13, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Merit. 14, Name of school = Bugashe I. 14, District = Mbarara city. 14, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Merit. 15, Name of school = Kayunga Girls P.S.. 15, District = Kayunga District. 15,
|
d49110c2-80ff-4150-9730-2c5a8312c41d
|
3 |
Appendix 25: Wealth Ranking of Households
Appendix 26: Parishes which selected flagship projects that were inconsistent with the LG selected priority commodities
Kibaale DLG, Name of HLG = Kahyooro. Kibaale DLG, Parish = Kahyoro Bwamiramira PDM SACCO LTD. Kibaale DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = Coffee, Vegetables, poulty, piggery, beans maize, Bananas. Kibaale DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = 100,000,000. Kibaale DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 1.. Kibaale DLG, Name of HLG = Kibingo. Kibaale DLG, Parish = Kibingo Bwamiramira PDM SACCO LTD. Kibaale DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = Coffee, poulty, maizee, vegetables and bananas. Kibaale DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = 100,000,000. Kibaale DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 2.. Kibaale DLG, Name of HLG = Kiribanga. Kibaale DLG, Parish = Kiribanga Bwamiramira PDM SACCO LTD. Kibaale DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = Piggery, Banana, Cassave, poultry and coffee. Kibaale DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = 100,000,000. Kibaale DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 3.. Kibaale DLG, Name of HLG = Kabasekende. Kibaale DLG, Parish = Kabasekende Kabasekende PDM SACCO LTD. Kibaale DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = Poultry, coffee, maize and piggery. Kibaale DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = 100,000,000. Kibaale DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 4.. Kibaale DLG, Name of HLG = Nyamugura. Kibaale DLG, Parish = Nyamugura Kabasekende PSM
|
66a50dc9-8a69-412a-939a-d3ef1cb35836
|
3 |
Appendix 12: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
PDM SACCO. 63, Coffee Keepers = Bananas,Piggery. 63, ,Rice,Piggery,Bee No = No. 63, 25 = 7. 63, 25 = 7. 63, 25 = 7. 63, 19 = 5. 63, 6 = 2. 64, NYABUBARE = MASYA. 64, NYABUBARE - BWAMBARA PDM SACCO = MASYA - NYAKAGYEME PDM SACCO. 64, Coffee Keepers = Bananas,Coffeee,Poultry. 64, ,Rice,Piggery,Bee No = No. 64, 25 = 13. 64, 25 = 13. 64, 25 = 13. 64, 19 = 12. 64, 6 = 1. 65, NYABUBARE = NYAKINENGO. 65, NYABUBARE - BWAMBARA PDM SACCO = NYAKINENGO - NYAKAGYEME. 65, Coffee Keepers = Bananas,Coffee. 65, ,Rice,Piggery,Bee No = Yes. 65, 25 = 21. 65, 25 = 21. 65, 25 = 21. 65, 19 = 21. 65, 6 = 0. 66, NYABUBARE = RUSHASHA. 66, NYABUBARE - BWAMBARA PDM SACCO = PDM SACCO RUSHASHA - NYAKAGYEME PDM SACCO. 66, Coffee Keepers = Bananas,Coffee,Poultry. 66, ,Rice,Piggery,Bee No = No. 66, 25 = 16. 66, 25 = 16. 66, 25 = 16. 66, 19 = 14. 66, 6 = 2. 67, NYABUBARE = BUROMBE. 67, NYABUBARE - BWAMBARA PDM SACCO = BUROMBE - RUHINDA PDM SACCO. 67, Coffee Keepers = Bananas,Coffee,Poultry,Piggery. 67, ,Rice,Piggery,Bee No = No. 67, 25 = 15. 67, 25 = 15. 67, 25 = 15. 67, 19 = 8. 67, 6 = 7. 68, NYABUBARE = KICWAMBA. 68, NYABUBARE - BWAMBARA
|
4a0aff8f-80dc-4337-ba32-214af9d5c682
|
3 |
Appendix 1Z: Selection and Implementation of PrioritizedLFlagship Projects
SN, 1 = Vot. SN, 2 = Parish. SN, 3 = Name of SACCO. SN, 4 = List of Are the. SN, 5 = How. SN, 6 = Number. SN, 7 = How. SN, 8 = How. , 1 = Na. , 2 = Name. , 3 = flagshi. , 4 = flagship. , 5 = many. , 6 = of PDM. , 7 = many of. , 8 = many of. , 1 = me. , 2 = . , 3 = project. , 4 = projects. , 5 = enterpris. , 6 = enterpri. , 7 = the. , 8 = the. , 1 = . , 2 = . , 3 = 5 per. , 4 = consiste nt with. , 5 = es are. , 6 = ses. , 7 = enterpri. , 8 = farming. , 1 = . , 2 = . , 3 = . , 4 = . , 5 = implemen. , 6 = . , 7 = ses are. , 8 = enterpri
|
8cc534d2-e4f6-407d-8f33-9299f42a6f7b
|
3 |
Appendix 13 (a): Implementation of ineligible activities
= 1052674. 45, county bugoigo parish = Ronny Businge. 45, county bugoigo parish = Facilitation for parish development committee in biiso town council kahemurwa ward. 45, 2022 00 activity = 3043238. 45, 2022 00 activity = 21/12/ 2022. 45, 2022 00 activity = 250,0 00. 45, 2022 00 activity = Ineligible activity. 46, = PROD/MAY/30/11. 46, = 1053066. 46, county bugoigo parish = Cliffdavis. 46, county bugoigo parish = facilitation for parish chief pdm activities quarter iv 2022/2023. 46, 2022 00 activity = 5826860. 46, 2022 00 activity = 08/06/. 46, 2022 00 activity = 250,0. 46, 2022 00 activity = Ineligible
64
|
71245060-769a-4e19-a2fb-a33d7424b694
|
3 |
Appendix 11: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
by the LG? = N/A. 4., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = . 4., Number of PDM enterprises = 33. 4., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 28. 4., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = . 5., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 5., Parish Name = Mifunya. 5., Name of SACCO = Mifunya PDM SACCO. 5., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Coffee Farming. 5., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 5., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 6. 5., Number of PDM enterprises = 28. 5., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 20. 5., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = . 6., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 6., Parish Name = Bukuuku. 6., Name of SACCO = Bukuuku, Kasangombe PDM SACCO. 6., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Piggery. 6., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 6., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 6. 6., Number of PDM enterprises = 20. 6., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 17. 6., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = . 7., Vote Name = Nakaseke DLG. 7., Parish Name = East Ward Kiwoko. 7., Name of SACCO = East Ward Kiwoko PDM SACCO. 7., List of flagship projects per SACCO = None. 7., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = N/A. 7., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = . 7., Number of PDM enterprises = 17. 7., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 10. 7., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity
|
add9fe6c-4850-46a8-b953-76dfd1e6b740
|
3 |
Appendix 41: Wealth Ranking of Households
Appendix 42: Parishes with flagship projects inconsistent with Hoima Selected Priority Commodities
Hoima DLG, Parish = MBEGU. 7. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = MBEGU KABAALE PDM SACCO. 7. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Goat rearing trading farming. 7. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 8. Hoima DLG, Parish = KIGAAGA. 8. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = KIGAAGA KABAALE PDM SACCO. 8. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans. 8. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 9. Hoima DLG, Parish = BULYANGO. 9. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = BULYANGO KITOBA PDM SACCO. 9. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans, Groundnuts. 9. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 10. Hoima DLG, Parish = KIBANJWA. 10. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = KIBANJWA KITOBA PDM SACCO. 10. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans. 10. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 11. Hoima DLG, Parish = BUDAKA. 11. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = BUDAKA KITOBA PDM SACCO. 11. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans, Groundnuts. 11. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 12. Hoima DLG, Parish = KIRYANGOBE. 12. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = KIRYANGOBE KITOBA PDM SACOO. 12. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans. 12. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF
|
3bf3f044-e74e-4845-9876-15181d74a07d
|
3 |
Appendix 41: Wealth Ranking of Households
Appendix 42: Parishes with flagship projects inconsistent with Hoima Selected Priority Commodities
(UGX.) = 100,000,000. 25. Hoima DLG, Parish = KIJONGOKIJONGO. 25. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = KIJONGOKIJONGO PDM SACCO. 25. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans. 25. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 26. Hoima DLG, Parish = MARONGOBOMBO. 26. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = MARONGOBOMBO PDM SACCO. 26. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans. 26. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 27. Hoima DLG, Parish = BUHIRIGI. 27. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = BUHIRIGI BOMBO PDM SACCO. 27. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans, Goats. 27. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 28. Hoima DLG, Parish = HANGA. 28. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = HANGA BOMBO PDM SACCO. 28. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans, Cassava. 28. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 29. Hoima DLG, Parish = BWIKYABOMBO. 29. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = BWIKYABOMBO PDM SACCO. 29. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans. 29. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 30. Hoima DLG, Parish = KANYIRA. 30. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = KANYIRA BOMBO PDM SACCO. 30. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Coffee. 30. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF
|
eb58157b-4b8e-4d51-88db-b9bdc042b015
|
3 |
Appendix 9: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
code = 705. 15, Entity Name = Entebbe MC. 15, Total sample of parishes = 4. 15, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = 0. 15, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = 0. 15, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 0. 15, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = 0. 16, Vote code = 707. 16, Entity Name = Iganga MC. 16, Total sample of parishes = 10. 16, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 16, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = -. 16, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 16, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 17, Vote code = 710. 17, Entity Name = Kapchorwa MC. 17, Total sample of parishes = 10. 17, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 17, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = -. 17, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 17, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 18, Vote code = 711. 18, Entity Name = Kasese MC. 18, Total sample of parishes = 18. 18, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 18, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = 18. 18, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 18. 18, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 19, Vote code = 712. 19, Entity Name = Kira MC. 19, Total sample of parishes = 6. 19, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = 0. 19, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly
|
2eb511d9-e912-4b03-bf2a-128032521384
|
3 |
Appendix 15: Parishes that selected flagship projects that were inconsistent with the LG selected priority commodities
Appendix 16: Farmer enterprise/households implemented projects that are not from the priority commodity list
DLG. 5, Parish Name = Kyakame se East parish. 5, Name of SACCO = KYAKAMESE EAST
PAKANYI PDM SACCO. 5, Name of PRF beneficiary = Katusiime Richard. 5, Was the benefici ary from the approve d PDM enterpri se = Yes. 5, Date loan was obtain ed = 17/03/2. 5, Loan Amount = . 5, Were the loan benef iciari es select ed throu gh the PDMI = . 5, Were they vetted by a village meeting convene d by the enterpri se groups = . 5, Remarks = The loan was approved. 6, Vote Name = 1 Masindi DLG. 6, Parish Name = Kyakame se East parish. 6, Name of SACCO = KYAKAMESE EAST PAKANYI PDM SACCO. 6, Name of PRF beneficiary = Katusiime Sandra. 6, Was the benefici ary from the approve d PDM enterpri se = Yes. 6, Date loan was obtain ed = 023 01/11/2 023. 6, Loan Amount = 1,000,000 1,000,000. 6, Were the loan benef iciari es select ed throu gh the PDMI = Yes Yes. 6, Were they vetted by a village meeting convene d by the enterpri se groups = Yes Yes. 6, Remarks = through PDMS The loan was approved through PDMS. 7, Vote Name = 1 Masindi DLG. 7, Parish Name = Kyatiri East Ward. 7, Name of SACCO = KYATIRI EAST KYATIRI
|
3858238c-5f77-47d3-9ca1-9204dbeaaf0a
|
3 |
Appendix 6: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
list = 2
45
4., Vote Name = Manafwa DLG. 4., Parish Name = BUNAMUKHE YA PARISH. 4., Name of SACCO = BUNAMUKHEYA KIMALULI SACCO. 4., List of flagship projects per SACCO = PDM Piggery, Poultry ,Maize. 4., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 4., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 11. 4., Number PDM enterpris e s = 11. 4., of How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 10. 4., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 1. 5., Vote Name = Manafwa DLG. 5., Parish Name = BUSANGAYI PARISH. 5., Name of SACCO = BUSANGAYI KHABUTOOLA SACCO. 5., List of flagship projects per SACCO = PDM Banana farming Goats rearing, dairy,. 5., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 5., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 12. 5., Number PDM enterpris e s = 18. 5., of How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 18. 5., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 2. 6., Vote Name = Manafwa DLG. 6., Parish Name = BUWOPUWA PARISH. 6., Name of SACCO = PDM SACCO. 6., List of flagship projects per SACCO = BUWOPUWA BUTIRU Poultry, Rice, Maize. 6., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 6., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 7. 6., Number PDM enterpris e s = 7. 6., of How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 7. 6., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 0. 7., Vote Name = Manafwa DLG. 7., Parish
|
3ca593a2-244b-476a-85fb-cf9990bcf493
|
3 |
Appendix 12: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
PDM SACCO. 36, Bananas,Coffee, = Bananas,Coffee, Piggery ,Millet. 36, No = No. 36, 18 = 23. 36, 18 = 23. 36, 18 = 23. 36, 8 = 18. 36, 10 = 5. , PDM SACCO = NYABUSHENY I. , = NYABUSHENYI - NYARUSHANJE. , Bananas,Coffee, = Bananas,Coffee, Poultry ,Goat. , No = No. , 18 = 17. , 18 = 17. , 18 = 17. , 8 = 16. , 10 = 1. 37, PDM SACCO = RUYONZA. 37, = PDM SACCO RUYONZA- NYARUSHANJE. 37, Bananas,Coffee, = Bananas,Coffee, Piggery. 37, No = No. 37, 18 = 36. 37, 18 = 36. 37, 18 = 36. 37, 8 = 20. 37, 10 = 16. 38 39, PDM SACCO = CENTRAL WARD. 38 39, = PDM SACCO CENTRAL - BIKURUNGU. 38 39, Bananas,Coffee, = Bananas,Coffee, Goat,Poultry. 38 39, No = No. 38 39, 18 = 8. 38 39, 18 = 8. 38 39, 18 = 8. 38 39, 8 = 6. 38 39, 10 = 2. 40, PDM SACCO = EASTERN WARD. 40, = SACCO EASTERN - BIKURUNGU T/C PDM SACCO. 40, Bananas,Coffee, = Cattle, Goat, Rice. 40, No = No. 40, 18 = 10. 40, 18 = 10. 40, 18 = 10. 40, 8 = 9. 40, 10 = 1. 41, PDM SACCO = WESTERN WARD. 41, = WESTERN - BIKURUNGU T/C PDM
|
f35a8a99-75dd-4db3-9a50-13bc72c1d4e0
|
3 |
Appendix 21: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabasekende Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 23. Kabasekende Parish, Kiribanga Parish = Bakunda Christine. Kabasekende Parish, Nakayi Susan = NRM Ruling party. Kabasekende Parish, Women representative = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabasekende Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 24. Kabasekende Parish, Kiribanga Parish = Birungi Sefuroza. Kabasekende Parish, Nakayi Susan = PWDS. Kabasekende Parish, Women representative = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabasekende Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 25. Kabasekende Parish, Kiribanga Parish = Kyarikunda Godetti. Kabasekende Parish, Nakayi Susan = Opinion Leader. Kabasekende Parish, Women representative = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabasekende Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 26. Kabasekende Parish, Kiribanga Parish = Kitone Lwarence. Kabasekende Parish, Nakayi Susan = Youth. Kabasekende Parish, Women representative = Did not prepare parish priorities and action. Kabasekende Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 27. Kabasekende Parish, Kiribanga Parish = Nsungwa Rosemary. Kabasekende Parish, Nakayi Susan = Women council. Kabasekende Parish, Women representative = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kabasekende Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action
|
e3018317-16bf-4a40-9f96-fa16d2a95beb
|
3 |
Appendix 21: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 62. Karangara Parish, Ruguuza Parish = Mugenyi Vincent. Karangara Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = Opinion Leader. Karangara Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Karangara Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 63. Kitaba Parish, Ruguuza Parish = asiimwe JohnBaptist. Kitaba Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = chairperson. Kitaba Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kitaba Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 64. Kitaba Parish, Ruguuza Parish = Nakku Prossy. Kitaba Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = secretary. Kitaba Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kitaba Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 65. Kitaba Parish, Ruguuza Parish = Kisa Paul. Kitaba Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = NRM Ruling party. Kitaba Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kitaba Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 66. Kitaba Parish, Ruguuza Parish = Sanyu Joseph. Kitaba Parish, Nalubobwe Peragia = youth. Kitaba Parish, secretary = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kitaba Parish, Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 67
93
|
f9c25a67-a327-4d13-b7aa-5b97b6d9a696
|
3 |
4.1.2.1 Planning
1, Category = Sub County with joint most allocation. 1, Sub County/Town Council Name Budget Amount = Morungole S/c. 1, Rankin g based on need = 63,000,000 2. 1, Rank interpretation = Second needy. 1, Rank interpretation = most. 1, = . 2, Category = Sub County with joint most allocation. 2, Sub County/Town Council Name Budget Amount = Lodiko. 2, Rankin g based on need = 63,000,000 4. 2, Rank interpretation = Fourth. 2, Rank interpretation = most. 2, = . 3, Category = Sub County with second most allocation. 3, Sub County/Town Council Name Budget Amount = Lobongia. 3, Rankin g based on need = 56,000,000 5. 3, Rank interpretation = . 3, Rank interpretation = needy Moderately needy. 3, = . 4, Category = Sub County with joint third most allocation. 4, Sub County/Town Council Name Budget Amount = Timu s/c. 4, Rankin g based on need = 35,000,000 1. 4, Rank interpretation = Most needy. 4, Rank interpretation = Most needy. 4, = . 5, Category = Sub County with joint third most allocation. 5, Sub County/Town Council Name Budget Amount = Sidok s/c. 5, Rankin g based on need = 35,000,000 7. 5, Rank interpretation = Second last least needy. 5, Rank interpretation = Second last least needy. 5, = . 6, Category = Sub County with joint third most Lolelia. 6, Sub County/Town Council Name Budget Amount = 35,000,000. 6, Rankin g based on need = 6. 6, Rank interpretation = Third least needy. 6, Rank interpretation = Third least needy. 6, = . 7, Category = Sub County with joint least. 7, Sub County/Town Council Name Budget Amount = kakamar. 7, Rankin g based on need = 28,000,000 3. 7, Rank interpretation = Third most needy. 7, Rank interpretation = Third most needy. 7, = . 8, Category = Sub County with joint least. 8, Sub County/Town Council Name Budget Amount = kaabong East. 8, Rankin g based on need = 28,000,000
|
abd48006-3c8b-4247-82e0-d0ec1a8ae0b3
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
plan = -. 101, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 101, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 102, Vote code = 914. 102, Entity Name = OmoroDLG. 102, No. of priorities = 10. 102, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 5. 102, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 102, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = 10. 102, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 103, Vote code = 915. 103, Entity Name = OtukeDLG. 103, No. of priorities = -. 103, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 103, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 103, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 103, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 104, Vote code = 916. 104, Entity Name = OyamDLG. 104, No. of priorities = -. 104, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = . 104, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 104, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 104, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 105, Vote code = 917. 105, Entity Name = PderDLG. 105, No. of priorities = -. 105, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 105, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 105, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 105, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 106, Vote
|
2b856aa8-a294-4716-ab09-9d3ecd6b62e9
|
3 |
Appendix 12: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
Ntoroko DLG, 1 = Kibuuku West. Ntoroko DLG, 2 = KIBUUKU WEST- KIBUUKU PDM SACCO. Ntoroko DLG, 3 = Tomatoes Cattle, Goat, Water melon, Maize, Beef. Ntoroko DLG, 4 = No. Ntoroko DLG, 5 = 7. Ntoroko DLG, 6 = 7. Ntoroko DLG, 7 = 6. Ntoroko DLG, 8 = 4. , 1 = Kibuuku South. , 2 = KIBUUKU SOUTH- KIBUUKU PDM SACCO. , 3 = supply Cattle, Goat, Water melon, Maize,. , 4 = No. , 5 = 7. , 6 = 7. , 7 = 7. , 8 = 4. Ntoroko DLG, 1 = Kibuuku. Ntoroko DLG, 2 = KIBUUKU NORTH- KIBUUKU PDM SACCO. Ntoroko DLG, 3 = Maize, Tomatoes, Goat, Beef selling, Cattle. Ntoroko DLG, 4 = No. Ntoroko DLG, 5 = 7. Ntoroko DLG, 6 = 7. Ntoroko DLG, 7 = 6. Ntoroko DLG, 8 = 3. Ntoroko DLG Ntoroko, 1 = North. Ntoroko DLG Ntoroko, 2 = KIBUUKU EAST-. Ntoroko DLG Ntoroko, 3 = Goats, Cattle, Piggery, Poultry, Maize,. Ntoroko DLG Ntoroko, 4 = No. Ntoroko DLG Ntoroko, 5 = 10. Ntoroko DLG Ntoroko, 6 = 11. Ntoroko DLG Ntoroko, 7 = 11. Ntoroko DLG Ntoroko, 8 = 2. Total, 1 = . Total, 2 = . Total, 3 = Tomatoes. Total, 4 = . Total, 5 = . Total, 6 = . Total, 7 = 104. Total, 8 = 54
53
|
5abb1e97-c65f-4a75-a956-390813aed6ea
|
3 |
Appendix 30: Irregularities in project implementation
Deogratious Otuba, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Deogratious Otuba, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Deogratious Otuba, Piggery = Cassava growing. Deogratious Otuba, 7 Mubako Mubako Ngwedo PDM Sacco Ltd = . Deogratious Otuba, -Beneficiary deals in piggery contrary to the LG approved enterprises. -Used funds to purchase 4 pigs and construct a pig sty. = -Cassava garden on 0.5 acre in place.. Pascal Okwayemun gu, 1,000,000 = 500,000. Pascal Okwayemun gu, 1,000,000 = 500,000. Pascal Okwayemun gu, Piggery = Cassava growing. Pascal Okwayemun gu, 7 Mubako Mubako Ngwedo PDM Sacco Ltd = . Pascal Okwayemun gu, -Beneficiary deals in piggery contrary to the LG approved enterprises. -Used funds to purchase 4 pigs and construct a pig sty. = -Cassava garden on 0.75 acre in place. Aliave Onyuti, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Aliave Onyuti, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Aliave Onyuti, Piggery = Cassava growing. Aliave Onyuti, 7 Mubako Mubako Ngwedo PDM Sacco Ltd = TOTAL. Aliave Onyuti, -Beneficiary deals in piggery contrary to the LG approved enterprises. -Used funds to purchase 4 pigs and construct a pig sty. = -Cassava garden on 1 acre in place.. , 1,000,000 = 14,500,000. , 1,000,000 = 14,500,000. , Piggery = . , 7 Mubako Mubako Ngwedo PDM Sacco Ltd = . , -Beneficiary deals in piggery contrary to the LG approved enterprises. -Used funds to purchase 4 pigs and construct a pig sty. =
100
|
23fd1eb1-7ca0-43af-b15e-bebc5b094a8d
|
3 |
Appendix 41: Wealth Ranking of Households
Appendix 42: Parishes with flagship projects inconsistent with Hoima Selected Priority Commodities
(UGX.) = 100,000,000. 13. Hoima DLG, Parish = KIRAGURA. 13. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = KIRAGURA KITOBA PDM SACCO. 13. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans. 13. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 14. Hoima DLG, Parish = BIRUNGU. 14. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = BIRUNGU KITOBA PDM SACCO. 14. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans. 14. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. , Parish = NDARAGI. , Name of PDM SACCO = NDARAGI KISUKUMA PDM SACCO. , Inconsistent Flagship projects = Goats, Soybeans. , Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 15. Hoima DLG, Parish = KABATINDULE. 15. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = KABATINDULE KISUKUMA PDM SACCO. 15. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Goats. 15. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 16. Hoima DLG 17. Hoima DLG, Parish = HAIBALE. 16. Hoima DLG 17. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = HAIBALE KISUKUMA PDM SACCO. 16. Hoima DLG 17. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Beans. 16. Hoima DLG 17. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 18. Hoima DLG, Parish = BUKONA. 18. Hoima DLG, Name of PDM SACCO = BUKONA KISUKUMA PDM SACCO. 18. Hoima DLG, Inconsistent Flagship projects = Poultry. 18. Hoima DLG, Expected PRF
|
c63c84e9-f03f-4c28-9272-93857d76acab
|
3 |
Appendix: 7 Implementation of Ineligible, and Non-Existent Projects
code = 914. 56, Entity Name.Entity Name = Omoro DLG. 56, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects = 2. 56, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects = 1. 56, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of PDM SACCOs with.No. of beneficiaries that had non-existent projects. = 0. 56, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of PDM SACCOs with.beneficiaries that had non- existent projects. = 0. 57, Vote code.Vote code = 917. 57, Entity Name.Entity Name = Pader DLG. 57, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects = 11. 57, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects = 3. 57, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of PDM SACCOs with.No. of beneficiaries that had non-existent projects. = 0. 57, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of PDM SACCOs with.beneficiaries that had non- existent projects. = 0. 58, Vote code.Vote code = 922. 58, Entity Name.Entity Name = Rubirizi DLG. 58, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects = 4. 58, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects = 4. 58, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of PDM SACCOs with.No. of beneficiaries that had non-existent projects. = 0. 58, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of PDM SACCOs with.beneficiaries that had non- existent projects. = 0. 59, Vote code.Vote
|
f682b7d2-6d7e-434f-9c6e-0a3e387e77a7
|
3 |
Appendix I: Documents Reviewed and Purpose of Review
Appendix IV: Selected local governments with their SpeciaL and Unit Schools
Iganga District, Institution = Bishop Willis Demo. School. Iganga District, Type of School = Unit. Iganga District, Ownership = Government. Iganga District, Number = . Iganga District, Institution = Buckley H.S.. Iganga District, Type of School = Unit. Iganga District, Ownership = Government. Iganga District, Number = . Iganga District, Institution = Iganga SSS. Iganga District, Type of School = Unit. Iganga District, Ownership = Government. Iganga District, Number = . Isingiro District, Institution = Kajaho P.S. Isingiro District, Type of School = Unit. Isingiro District, Ownership = Government. Isingiro District, Number = . Isingiro District, Institution = Rutsya P.S. Isingiro District, Type of School = Unit. Isingiro District, Ownership = Government. Isingiro District, Number = . Isingiro District, Institution = St. Boniconcilii SS. Isingiro District, Type of School = Unit. Isingiro District, Ownership = Private. Isingiro District, Number = . Jinja City, Institution = Kyomya PS.. Jinja City, Type of School = Unit. Jinja City, Ownership = Government. Jinja City, Number = . Jinja City, Institution = M Wanyange Primary School. Jinja City, Type of School = Unit. Jinja City, Ownership = Government. Jinja City, Number = . Jinja City, Institution = St Francis De Sales Primary School. Jinja City, Type of School = Special. Jinja City, Ownership = Private. Jinja City, Number = . Jinja City, Institution = Spire Road. Jinja City, Type of School = Unit. Jinja City, Ownership = Government. Jinja City, Number = . Jinja City, Institution = St. Ursula Day-care Centre. Jinja City, Type of School = Special. Jinja City, Ownership = Private. Jinja City, Number = . Jinja City, Institution = Walukuba West. Jinja City, Type of School = Unit. Jinja City, Ownership =
|
0d679d74-a118-4709-9722-17a27db7360a
|
3 |
Appendix 5 - Irregularities in project implementation
SHEEMA DLG, 1 = MABAARE. SHEEMA DLG, 2 = MABAARE MASHERUKA PDM SACCO. SHEEMA DLG, 3 = ASIIMWE DONATIRA BAGAMBA CHARLES. SHEEMA DLG, 4 = 104,500,000. SHEEMA DLG, 5 = 1,000,000 @ each. SHEEMA DLG, 6 = BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH. SHEEMA DLG, 7 = 5. 6.. SHEEMA DLG, 8 = The SACCOs had existent projects. SHEEMA, 1 = BURINGO. SHEEMA, 2 = BURINGO MASHERUKA PDM SACCO. SHEEMA, 3 = MUHEBWA JOHN PATRICK KAKABIRO WILSON. SHEEMA, 4 = 105,500,000. SHEEMA, 5 = 1,000,000 @ each. SHEEMA, 6 = BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH. SHEEMA, 7 = DLG 7.. SHEEMA, 8 = The SACCOs had existent projects. SHEEMA, 1 = RUNYINYA. SHEEMA, 2 = RUNYINYA KIGARAMA PDM SACCO. SHEEMA, 3 = MUUJURIZI DANEIL AINEOMUGISHA MELLON. SHEEMA, 4 = 105,500,000. SHEEMA, 5 = 1,000,000 @ each. SHEEMA, 6 = BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH. SHEEMA, 7 = DLG 8.. SHEEMA, 8 = The SACCOs had existent projects. , 1 = KYAMURARI. , 2 = KYAMURARI SOUTH BUGONGI PDM SACCO. , 3 = MUHWEZI MOSES NATUKUNDA ANNAH. , 4 = 106,500,000. , 5 = 1,000,000 @ each. , 6 = BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH. , 7 = SHEEMA DLG SOUTH. , 8 = The SACCOs had existent projects
37
|
b0a3801b-738a-4adc-bcf9-2ac381ccdb43
|
3 |
Appendix 6; Failure to prepare parish priorities
7, SACCO LTD = KITOJO-BUBAARE PDM SACCO LTD. 7, = Yes. 7, = No. 7, = No. 7, = Yes. 7, = 750,000. 7, priorities and action plans prepared = No Parish priorities and action plans prepared. 8, SACCO LTD = KACEENAGA -NYAMWEERU PDM SACCO LTD. 8, = Yes. 8, = No. 8, = No. 8, = Yes. 8, = 750,000. 8, priorities and action plans prepared = No Parish priorities and action plans prepared. 9, SACCO LTD = IHANGA-BUBARE PDM SACCO LTD. 9, = Yes. 9, = No. 9, = No. 9, = Yes. 9, = 750,000. 9, priorities and action plans prepared = No Parish priorities and action plans prepared. 10, SACCO LTD = HAMUTOORA-BUTARE- KATOJO PDM SACCO LTD. 10, = Yes. 10, = No. 10, = No. 10, = Yes. 10, = 750,000. 10, priorities and action plans prepared = No Parish priorities and action plans
|
9d495dab-f0b2-4dc2-b1d3-586e36097ca4
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
plan = -. 128, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 128, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 129, Vote code = 843. 129, Entity Name = KagadiDLG. 129, No. of priorities = 151. 129, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 26. 129, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 151. 129, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 129, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes
32
|
3874d41f-4b4e-4ac3-973a-2050f6ec16b7
|
3 |
Appendix 9: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
performance reports = -. 142, Vote code = 708. 142, Entity Name = Kabale MC. 142, Total sample of parishes = 10. 142, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 142, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = -. 142, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = -. 142, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 143, Vote code = 911. 143, Entity Name = Ntungamo DLG. 143, Total sample of parishes = 10. 143, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 143, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = -. 143, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 143, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 144, Vote code = 832. 144, Entity Name = Gomba DLG. 144, Total sample of parishes = 10. 144, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 144, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = -. 144, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = 10. 144, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 145, Vote code = 855. 145, Entity Name = Kasanda DLG. 145, Total sample of parishes = 10. 145, No. of parishes without fully constituted PDCs = -. 145, No. of parishes that did not hold all the 4 quarterly meetings = -. 145, No. of parishes that did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023 = -. 145, No. of parishes that did not prepared quarterly performance reports = -. 146, Vote code = 810. 146, Entity Name = Arua DLG. 146, Total sample of parishes = 32. 146, No. of parishes without fully constituted
|
d547d6b6-8562-427a-b53b-d2e5ac676674
|
3 |
Appendix 26: Failure to Register Enterprise Groups
= Buhimba East. 26., Buhimba PDM SACCO = Buhimba East- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 26., = No. 26., = 28/06/22. 26., = n/a. 27., DLG = Kikuube DLG. 27., = Buhimba West. 27., Buhimba PDM SACCO = Buhimba West- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 27., = No. 27., = 28/06/22. 27., = n/a. 28., DLG = Kikuube DLG. 28., = Kigaaya East. 28., Buhimba PDM SACCO = Kigaaya East- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 28., = No. 28., = 28/06/22. 28., = n/a. 29., DLG = Kikuube DLG. 29., = Kigaaya West. 29., Buhimba PDM SACCO = Kigaaya West- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 29., = No. 29., = 28/06/22. 29., = n/a
|
7e2dbf7b-2194-4c8e-9af3-c1ea3cf70632
|
3 |
Appendix 17: Wealth Ranking of Households
villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No. 9 Kywankwanzi DLG, Remarks = No wealth ranking was conducted. 10 Kywankwanzi DLG, Vote Name = . 10 Kywankwanzi DLG, Parish Name = Luwawu Parish. 10 Kywankwanzi DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = Luwawu-Mulagi PDM SACCO. 10 Kywankwanzi DLG, No. of villages = 6. 10 Kywankwanzi DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No. 10 Kywankwanzi DLG, Remarks = No wealth ranking was conducted. , Vote Name = . , Parish Name = TOTAL. , Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = . , No. of villages = 38. , No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = . , Remarks =
|
62d2bbc8-2499-4c5a-8a41-b6348fb28713
|
3 |
Appendix 5 - Irregularities in project implementation
35
, = KYANGYENYI. , KAGONGI KYANGYENYI PDM SACCO = KYANGYENYI KAKINDO PDM SACCO. , BASHEMERIRWE MARY BARENZI FRANCIS = MUCUNGUZI ELDARD TWIKIRIZE HOPE. , 105,100,000 = 106,500,000. , 1,000,000 @ each = 1,000,000 @ each. , BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH = BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH. , SHEEMA DLG KAGONGI 2. SHEEMA DLG = 3. SHEEMA DLG. , = RWEIBARE. , KAGONGI KYANGYENYI PDM SACCO = RWEIBAARE KAKINDO PDM SACCO. , BASHEMERIRWE MARY BARENZI FRANCIS = MUHUMUZA WILLIAM TUMUHAIRWE. , 105,100,000 = 106,300,000. , 1,000,000 @ each = 1,000,000 @ each. , BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH = BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH. , SHEEMA DLG KAGONGI 2. SHEEMA DLG = . , = KYABUHARAMBO. , KAGONGI KYANGYENYI PDM SACCO = KYABUHARAMBO MASHERUKA PDM SACCO. , BASHEMERIRWE MARY BARENZI FRANCIS = ANKUNDA EMMANUEL KAHONAHO DEUS. , 105,100,000 = 104,000,000. , 1,000,000 @ each = 1,000,000 @ each. , BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH = BANANA COFFEE,DIARY,PIGGERY, FISH. , SHEEMA DLG KAGONGI 2. SHEEMA DLG = 4. SHEEMA DLG
36
The SACCOs
had existent
projects
The SACCOs
had existent
projects
The SACCOs
had existent
projects
The SACCOs
had existent
projects
|
bbb94aa4-c262-4407-8650-6cdf283b7a91
|
3 |
Appendix 12: Functionality_of PDCs
31, 1 = Madowa. 31, 2 = YES. 31, 3 = YES. 31, 4 = YES. 31, 5 = NO. 31, 6 = No. 31, 7 = 750,000. 31, 8 = Only Monitoring reports were made for 3 quarters per parish. 32, 1 = Bubango. 32, 2 = YES. 32, 3 = YES. 32, 4 = YES. 32, 5 = NO. 32, 6 = No. 32, 7 = 750,000. 32, 8 = Only Monitoring reports were made for 3 quarters per parish. 33, 1 = Namayuge. 33, 2 = YES. 33, 3 = YES. 33, 4 = YES. 33, 5 = NO. 33, 6 = No. 33, 7 = 750,000. 33, 8 = Only Monitoring reports were made for 3 quarters per parish. 34, 1 = Buswale. 34, 2 = YES. 34, 3 = YES. 34, 4 = YES. 34, 5 = NO. 34, 6 = No. 34, 7 = 750,000. 34, 8 = Only Monitoring reports were made for 3 quarters per parish. 35, 1 = Bungecha. 35, 2 = YES. 35, 3 = YES. 35, 4 = YES. 35, 5 = NO. 35, 6 = No. 35, 7 = 750,000. 35, 8 = Only Monitoring reports were made for 3 quarters per. 36, 1 = Nansuma. 36, 2 = YES. 36, 3 = YES. 36, 4 = YES. 36, 5 = NO. 36, 6 = No. 36, 7 = 00o 750,C. 36, 8 = Only Monitoring reports were made for 3 quarters per parish. 37, 1 = Manga. 37, 2 = YES. 37, 3 = YES. 37, 4 = YES. 37, 5 = NO. 37, 6 = No. 37, 7 = 750,000. 37, 8 = parish Only Monitoring reports were made for 3 quarters per parish. 38, 1 = Rabachi. 38, 2 = YES. 38, 3 = YES. 38, 4 = YES. 38, 5 = NO. 38, 6 = No. 38, 7 =
|
abf56719-6f75-4304-8aa5-9a2858440c7a
|
3 |
Appendix 21: Parish Development Committees (PDC)
plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kahyooro Parish, Audit remarks = 7. Kibingo Parish, Parish Name = Nsugwa Catherine. Kibingo Parish, PDC Members = Women representative. Kibingo Parish, Title = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kibingo Parish, Audit remarks = 8. Kibingo Parish, Parish Name = Isimbwa Micheal. Kibingo Parish, PDC Members = Opinion Leader. Kibingo Parish, Title = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kibingo Parish, Audit remarks = 9. Kibingo Parish, Parish Name = Kabagole Harriet. Kibingo Parish, PDC Members = PWDs. Kibingo Parish, Title = Did not prepare parish priorities and action. Kibingo Parish, Audit remarks = 10. Kibingo Parish, Parish Name = Bitamazire Kirizestom. Kibingo Parish, PDC Members = NRM ruling party. Kibingo Parish, Title = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kibingo Parish, Audit remarks = 11. Kibingo Parish, Parish Name = Katesigwa Steven. Kibingo Parish, PDC Members = Chairperson LCII. Kibingo Parish, Title = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kibingo Parish, Audit remarks = 12. Kibingo Parish, Parish Name = Nalwanga Caroline. Kibingo Parish, PDC Members = Secretary. Kibingo Parish, Title = Did not prepare parish priorities and action plans for the FY 2022/2023. Kibingo Parish, Audit remarks = 13. Kibingo Parish, Parish Name = Kasabe Peter. Kibingo Parish, PDC Members = Youth leader. Kibingo Parish, Title = Did not prepare parish priorities and action
|
18874625-dbc1-42af-89d0-0a55c103e115
|
3 |
Appendix 14: Registration of PDM SACCOs
24, Ntungamo DLG = Ntungamo DLG. 24, Rwengoma parish = Ruhanga parish. 24, Rwengoma- Ruhaama PDM SACCO = Ruhanga- Itojo PDM. 24, Asiimwe Florence = Bendeza Deneth. 24, yes = yes. 24, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 24, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 24, = No. 24, No Yes = Yes. 24, No = No. 24, Hen rearing = Goat rearing. 25, Ntungamo DLG = Ntungamo DLG. 25, Rwengoma parish = Ruhanga parish. 25, Rwengoma- Ruhaama PDM SACCO = Ruhanga- Itojo PDM. 25, Asiimwe Florence = Bugumya Wilber. 25, yes = yes. 25, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 25, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 25, = No. 25, No Yes = Yes. 25, No = No. 25, Hen rearing = coffee. 26, Ntungamo DLG = Ntungamo DLG. 26, Rwengoma parish = Nshenyi parish. 26, Rwengoma- Ruhaama PDM SACCO = Nshenyi- Kitwe PDM. 26, Asiimwe Florence = Tukwasibwe Henry. 26, yes = yes. 26, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 26, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 26, = No. 26, No Yes = Yes. 26, No = No. 26, Hen rearing = piggery. 27, Ntungamo DLG = Ntungamo DLG. 27, Rwengoma parish = Nshenyi parish. 27, Rwengoma- Ruhaama PDM SACCO = Nshenyi- Kitwe PDM. 27, Asiimwe Florence = Ayebare Kugumanawe. 27, yes = yes. 27, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 27, 1,000,000 = . 27, = 1,000,000 No. 27, No Yes = Yes. 27, No = No. 27, Hen rearing = coffee
|
dac02a90-e009-4652-9e69-94337b010701
|
3 |
Appendix 19: Enterprise/households implemented projects that are not from the priority commodity list
1, Vote Name = Kywankwanz i DLG. 1, Parish Name = Katuugo Parish. 1, Name of SACCO = Katuugo- Nsambya PDM SACCO. 1, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Piggery, Maize growing, Coffee groiwng, Bull Fattening. 1, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected = Yes. 1, How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 18. 1, Number of PDM enterprise s = 18. 1, How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 18. 1, How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit = 18. 2, Vote Name = Kywankwanz i DLG. 2, Parish Name = Misago Parish. 2, Name of SACCO = Misago- Butemba PDM SACCO. 2, List of flagship projects per SACCO = farming Maize, Beef. 2, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected = Yes. 2, How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 9. 2, Number of PDM enterprise s = 9. 2, How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 9. 2, How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit = 9. 3, Vote Name = Kywankwanz i DLG. 3, Parish Name = Kijuubya Parish. 3, Name of SACCO = Kijuubya- Byerima PDM SACCO. 3, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Maize growing, Coffee growing, diary. 3, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected = Yes. 3, How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 16. 3, Number of PDM enterprise s = 16. 3, How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 16. 3, How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit = 16. 4, Vote Name = Kywankwanz i DLG. 4, Parish Name = Biroboka Ward. 4, Name of SACCO = Biroboka
|
12124ef6-30a8-4208-8214-5e5c3fb01cc8
|
3 |
Appendix 7g: Selection and implementation of prioritized/flagship projects
SACCO. 2., List of flagship projects per SACCO = - - - -. 2., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Banana Coffee Piggery Poultry. 2., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 2., How many enterpris es are impleme nting flagship projects = 3. 2., Number of PDM enterprises = 6. 2., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 6. 2., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 3. 3., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 3., Parish Name = Kabujogera. 3., Name of SACCO = Kabujogera- Kabujogera PDM SACCO. 3., List of flagship projects per SACCO = - - - - -. 3., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Greens Coffee Passion Cattle Banana. 3., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 3., How many enterpris es are impleme nting flagship projects = 4. 3., Number of PDM enterprises = 6. 3., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 6. 3., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 4. 4., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 4., Parish Name = Kantozi. 4., Name of SACCO = Kantozi- Kabujogera PDM SACCO. 4., List of flagship projects per SACCO = - - - - - - -. 4., List of flagship projects per SACCO = poultry Banana Piggery Coffee Maize Passion Beans. 4., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. 4., How many enterpris es are impleme nting flagship projects = 3. 4., Number of PDM enterprises = 7. 4., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 7. 4., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 3. 5., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 5., Parish Name = Ntara. 5., Name of
|
e6f886e7-4b85-4a9e-821a-f6af06409141
|
3 |
Appendix 30: Households that did not implement items from the priority list
SACCO. 4., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Food crops. 4., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected by the LG? = No. 4., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 19. 4., Number of PDM enterprise s = 21. 4., How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 20. 4., How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit y list = 20. 5., Vote Name = Kikuub e DLG. 5., Parish Name = Musaijamukur u East. 5., Name of SACCO = Musaijamukur u East- Buhimba PDM SACCO. 5., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Diary, Food crop. 5., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected by the LG? = No. 5., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 20. 5., Number of PDM enterprise s = 20. 5., How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 19. 5., How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit y list = 19. 6., Vote Name = Kikuub. 6., Parish Name = Musaijamukur. 6., Name of SACCO = Musaijamukur. 6., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Piggery,. 6., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commoditie s selected by the LG? = Yes. 6., How many enterprises are implementin g flagship projects = 18. 6., Number of PDM enterprise s = 18. 6., How many of the enterprise s are farming enterprise s = 18. 6., How many of the farming enterprise s are from the priority commodit y list = 18
80
|
36742d76-449e-4670-8c8c-b1373247705a
|
3 |
Appendix 11: Delayed disbursement of Parish Revolving Fund (PRFQ
1, Vot e Na me = iri MC Bug. 1, Pari sh Na me = Nkus. 1, Name of SACCO = Nkusi Eastern Division PDM SACCO. 1, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Dairy farming Piggery Poultry Horticulture Coffee Fish farming Fruit trees. 1, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Partially . The commodities of rice and maize don't fall under any of the priority projects.. 1, Num ber of hous ehol ds = 107. 1, Number of households implementing items from the priority commodity list = 87. 2, Vot e Na me = Bug iri MC. 2, Pari sh Na me = Nalu were re. 2, Name of SACCO = Naluwerere Eastern Divison PDM SACCO. 2, List of flagship projects per SACCO = farming Piggery Poultry Horticulture Coffee Fish farming Dairy. 2, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Partially . The commodities of rice and maize don't fall under any of the priority projects.. 2, Num ber of hous ehol ds = 108. 2, Number of households implementing items from the priority commodity list = 75. 3, Vot e Na me = iri MC Bug. 3, Pari sh Na me = Bwol. 3, Name of SACCO = Western Division PDM SACCO. 3, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Fruit trees Dairy farming Piggery Poultry Horticulture Coffee Fish farming. 3, Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Partially . The commodities of rice and maize don't fall under any of the priority projects.. 3, Num ber of hous ehol ds = 106. 3, Number of households implementing items from the priority commodity list = 106. , Vot e Na me = Bug iri MC. , Pari sh Na me = Ndif akul ya. , Name of
|
d668b0eb-a48e-4396-af32-16222ecb3ea6
|
3 |
Appendix 14: Failure to select and implement prioritized / flagship projects
Buyinja PDM SACCO. 10, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Coffee Bananas Cassava Poultry Fish farming. 10, Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties by the LG? = No. 10, How many enterpri ses are impleme nting flagship projects (Enterpr ise grps) = 12. 10, Number of PDM enterpris es = . 10, How many of the enterpris es are farming enterpris es = . 10, How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list = 3. 11, Vote Name = Namayingo. 11, Parish Name = Hama. 11, Name of SACCO = Hama Lolwe PDM SACCO. 11, List of flagship projects per SACCO = Beans Poultry Dairy cattle Water melon Tomatoes. 11, Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties by the LG? = No. 11, How many enterpri ses are impleme nting flagship projects (Enterpr ise grps) = 12. 11, Number of PDM enterpris es = 5. 11, How many of the enterpris es are farming enterpris es = 5. 11, How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list =
|
4bc72c8c-c3a7-41d7-8245-54e8357b28c7
|
3 |
Appendix 30: Households that did not implement items from the priority list
7., e DLG = Kikuub e DLG. 7., u West = Buhimba East. 7., u West- Buhimba PDM SACCO = Buhimba East-Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 7., Food crop = Coffee, Poultry, Vegetable s, Food crop. 7., = No. 7., = 7. 7., = 14. 7., = 13. 7., = 7. 8., e DLG = Kikuub e DLG. 8., u West = Buhimba west. 8., u West- Buhimba PDM SACCO = Buhimba West-. 8., Food crop = Poultry, Piggery,. 8., = No. 8., = 13. 8., = 18. 8., = 10. 8., = 9. 9., e DLG = Kikuub e DLG. 9., u West = Kigaaya East. 9., u West- Buhimba PDM SACCO = Kigaaya East- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 9., Food crop = Piggery, Vegetable s, Food. 9., = No. 9., = 14. 9., = 14. 9., = 12. 9., = 10. 10., e DLG = Kikuub e DLG. 10., u West = Kigaaya West. 10., u West- Buhimba PDM SACCO = Kigaaya West- Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 10., Food crop = Poultry, Diary, Piggery, Food Crop. 10., = No. 10., = 12. 10., = 14. 10., = 6. 10., = 5. , e DLG = . , u West = . , u West- Buhimba PDM SACCO = TOTAL. , Food crop = . , = . , = 164. , = 197. , = 166. , = 145
|
42b7f7b7-fac4-44cc-9548-a4bd7fb684a3
|
3 |
Appendix 17: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
1., Vote Name = Kassan da. 1., Parish Name = Nakidudu ma. 1., Name of SACCO = Nakidudu ma- Kiganda. 1., List of flagsh ip proje cts per SACC O Not = provid ed. 1., Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties selected by the LG? = No. 1., How many enterprise s are implemen ting flagship projects = 1. 1., Number of PDM enterpri ses = 2. 1., How many of the enterpri ses are farming enterpri ses = 2. 1., How many of the farming enterpri ses are from the priority commod ity list = 1. 2., Vote Name = Kassan da. 2., Parish Name = Jjemba. 2., Name of SACCO = Jjemba- Kassanda. 2., List of flagsh ip proje cts per SACC O Not = Not provid. 2., Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties selected by the LG? = No. 2., How many enterprise s are implemen ting flagship projects = 1. 2., Number of PDM enterpri ses = 2. 2., How many of the enterpri ses are farming enterpri ses = 2. 2., How many of the farming enterpri ses are from the priority commod ity list = 1. 3., Vote Name = Kassan da. 3., Parish Name = Kawunge ra. 3., Name of SACCO = TC Kawunger a-Kiganda TC. 3., List of flagsh ip proje cts per SACC O Not = ed Not provid ed. 3., Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties selected by the LG? = No. 3., How many enterprise s are implemen ting flagship projects = 0. 3., Number of PDM enterpri ses = 2. 3., How many of the enterpri ses are farming enterpri ses = 2. 3., How many of the farming enterpri ses are from the priority commod ity list = 0. 4., Vote Name = Kassan da. 4., Parish Name = Kasamby a. 4., Name of SACCO = Kasamby a- Kamuli. 4., List of flagsh ip
|
9c1d0133-3441-4d52-a599-72628799d4e2
|
3 |
priority commodities
SACCO. 35, Piggery, Beans, = Bean , Passion fruit ,. 35, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 36, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 36, Kiryamusunku Parish = Bakusekamajja Ward. 36, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Bakusekamajja Ward-Ntunda PDM SACCO. 36, Piggery, Beans, = Piggery. 36, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 37, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 37, Kiryamusunku Parish = Wandegeya Ward. 37, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Wandegeya Ward- Ntunda PDM SACCO. 37, Piggery, Beans, = Piggery. 37, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 38, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 38, Kiryamusunku Parish = Bukomero Ward. 38, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Bukomero Ward- Ntunda PDM SACCO. 38, Piggery, Beans, = Vegetable , Sheep rearing, Poultry,. 38, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 39, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 39, Kiryamusunku Parish = Bukwiri Ward. 39, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Bukwiri Ward- Butemba PDM SACCO. 39, Piggery, Beans, = Tomato , Vegetable , pig rearing, Beans , Goat rearing, , Rabbit rearing, Poultry, Water melon. 39, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 40, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 40, Kiryamusunku Parish = Butemba Ward. 40, Kiryamusunku- Byerima PDM SACCO = Butemba Ward- Butemba PDM SACCO. 40, Piggery, Beans, = Sweet Potato , , Beans
|
cbc3f22e-d6d7-4438-bac0-03295a541895
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
plan = -. 35, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 35, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 36, Vote code = 817. 36, Entity Name = BukedeaDLG. 36, No. of priorities = -. 36, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 36, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 36, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 36, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 37, Vote code = 819. 37, Entity Name = BukwoDLG. 37, No. of priorities = -. 37, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 37, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 37, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 37, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 38, Vote code = 820. 38, Entity Name = BulambuliDLG. 38, No. of priorities = 28. 38, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 28. 38, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 28. 38, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 38, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 39, Vote code = 822. 39, Entity Name = BundibugyoDLG. 39, No. of priorities = 7. 39, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 10. 39, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 39, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = 7. 39, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 40, Vote
|
ca503fd0-749a-40df-8f41-a7a61c0eecb5
|
3 |
4.9.25.2 Irregularities in project implementation
being implemen ted. 5., KATAK WI DLG = . 5., = . 5., = Central Ward Usuk Town Council Pdm Sacco Limited. 5., Esokodo Isaac = . 5., 1,000,000 = . 5., 989,000 = . 5., Sheep rearing = rearing. 5., Bought 1 sheep. The balance bought a second hand motorcycle (the wife represented the husband who had gone for burial with the motorcycle) = . 5., Different project being implemen ted = Different. 6., KATAK WI DLG = KATAK WI DLG. 6., = Odoot. 6., = Odoot Palam Pdm Sacco Limited. 6., Esokodo Isaac = Amuron Janet. 6., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 6., 989,000 = 970,000. 6., Sheep rearing = Poultry. 6., Bought 1 sheep. The balance bought a second hand motorcycle (the wife represented the husband who had gone for burial with the motorcycle) = Bought 1 cow (changed due to chicken pox disease at that time).. 6., Different project being implemen ted = Different project being implemen ted
66
|
b865d146-e38c-425d-955f-90cecf9f97f4
|
3 |
Appendix 7g: Selection and implementation of prioritized/flagship projects
Poultry Cassava. 7., 6 = No. 7., 7 = 2. 7., 8 = 8. 7., 9 = 8. 7., 10 = 2. 8., 1 = Kitagwenda. 8., 2 = Rugarama. 8., 3 = Rugarama-Ntara PDM SACCO. 8., 4 = - - - - - - - -. 8., 5 = Piggery Beans Cattle Irish Coffee Piggery Millet Tomatoes. 8., 6 = No. 8., 7 = 2. 8., 8 = 7. 8., 9 = 7. 8., 10 = 2. 9., 1 = Kitagwenda. 9., 2 = Bujumiro. 9., 3 = Bujumiro- Buhanda PDM SACCO. 9., 4 = - - - - -. 9., 5 = Coffee Pineapple Banana Piggery Poultry. 9., 6 = No. 9., 7 = 3. 9., 8 = 5. 9., 9 = 7. 9., 10 = 3. 10., 1 = Kitagwenda. 10., 2 = Nyakasenyi. 10., 3 = Nyakasenyi - Buhanda PDM. 10., 4 = - - - - -. 10., 5 = Coffee Banana Piggery Poultry Cattle. 10., 6 = Yes. 10., 7 = 4. 10., 8 = 5. 10., 9 = 5. 10., 10 = 4. , 1 = . , 2 = . , 3 = . , 4 = . , 5 = . , 6 = . , 7 = 29. , 8 = 59. , 9 = . , 10 =
45
|
59c46a18-7b62-4910-b2f6-49aef3b2c755
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
code = 848. 58, Entity Name = KalunguDLG. 58, No. of priorities = 0. 58, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 0. 58, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 0. 58, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 58, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 59, Vote code = 850. 59, Entity Name = KamwengeDLG. 59, No. of priorities = -. 59, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 59, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 59, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 59, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 60, Vote code = 851. 60, Entity Name = KanunguDLG. 60, No. of priorities = 45. 60, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 4. 60, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 45. 60, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 60, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 61, Vote code = 852. 61, Entity Name = KapchorwaDLG. 61, No. of priorities = -. 61, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 15. 61, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 61, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 61, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 62, Vote code = 853. 62, Entity Name = KapelebyongDLG. 62, No. of priorities = -. 62, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = . 62, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work
|
efe29241-ff0d-4500-9cb1-5d3081aa6029
|
3 |
Appendix 15: Parishes that selected flagship projects that were inconsistent with the LG selected priority commodities
beans, soya beans, G.nuts. 32 Masindi DLG, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. Masindi DLG, Masindi DLG = Kyakamese West parish. Masindi DLG, Kimanya parish = PAKANYI PDM SACCO. Masindi DLG, KIMANYA NYANTONZI PDM SACCO = KYAKAMESE WEST. Masindi DLG, Beans, goat raring, peas, piggery, G.nuts, rice, soya beans = goat raring, piggery, beans, soya beans, G.nuts, sun flower 100,000,000. Masindi DLG, 100,000,000 = 33. 34 Masindi DLG, Masindi DLG = Kyangamwoy o parish. 34 Masindi DLG, Kimanya parish = PAKANYI PDM SACCO. 34 Masindi DLG, KIMANYA NYANTONZI PDM SACCO = KYANGAMWOYO. 34 Masindi DLG, Beans, goat raring, peas, piggery, G.nuts, rice, soya beans = goat rearing, piggery, beans, soya beans, G.nuts, sun flower. 34 Masindi DLG, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 35 Masindi DLG, Masindi DLG = Kyarutanga parish. 35 Masindi DLG, Kimanya parish = KYARUTANGA SACCO. 35 Masindi DLG, KIMANYA NYANTONZI PDM SACCO = KIJUNJUBWA PDM. 35 Masindi DLG, Beans, goat raring, peas, piggery, G.nuts, rice, soya beans = G.nuts, piggery. 35 Masindi DLG, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 36 Masindi DLG, Masindi DLG = Kyatiri East. 36 Masindi DLG, Kimanya parish = SACCO. 36 Masindi DLG, KIMANYA NYANTONZI PDM SACCO = KYATIRI EAST
|
2b294a2b-7c87-40b6-8757-082757e8eb45
|
3 |
Appendix 15: Selection and Implementation of Prioritized/Flagship Projects
9., Kasese DLG = Kasese DLG. 9., Harukugu = Katholu/Katojo. 9., Harukugu - Isango PDM SACCO = Katholu/Katojo- Nyakiyumbu PDM. 9., Nzyabake Asinasi = Thembo Julius. 9., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 9., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 9., Selling and buying goats = Selling dry fish. 9., The Same project implemented as per loan application = The Same project. 10, Kasese DLG = Kasese DLG. 10, Harukugu = Kinyamaseke south. 10, Harukugu - Isango PDM SACCO = Kinyamaseke south- Kinyamaseke Town Council PDM. 10, Nzyabake Asinasi = Ithungu Miriyeri. 10, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 10, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 10, Selling and buying goats = Selling of cassava flour. 10, The Same project implemented as per loan application = application Implemented different project from piggery Cassava selling.. , Kasese DLG = . , Harukugu = . , Harukugu - Isango PDM SACCO = SACCO. , Nzyabake Asinasi = Kabungho Peace. , 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. , 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. , Selling and buying goats = Piggery. , The Same project implemented as per loan application = The Same project implemented as per loan
63
|
19a1f84d-ba1e-46e6-a3d5-027507c00557
|
3 |
Appendix 18: Physical Inspection of Household Project Implementation
PDM SACCO. 14, Asiimwe Hashim = Katusiim e Richard. 14, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 14, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 14, Maize = Maize. 14, Project implemente d as planned = Project implemente d as planned. 15, Masind i DLG = Masind i DLG. 15, Kihonda parish = Kyakames e East parish. 15, KIHONDA LABONGO PDM SACCO = KYAKAMES E EAST PAKANYI PDM SACCO. 15, Asiimwe Hashim = Katusiim e Sarah. 15, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 15, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 15, Maize = Maize. 15, Project implemente d as planned = Project implemente d as planned. 16, Masind i DLG = Masind i DLG. 16, Kihonda parish = Kyatiri East Ward. 16, KIHONDA LABONGO PDM SACCO = KYATIRI EAST KYATIRI PDM SACCO. 16, Asiimwe Hashim = Atuhura Oliver. 16, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 16, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 16, Maize = Gnuts. 16, Project implemente d as planned = Project implemente d as planned. 17, Masind i DLG = Masind i DLG. 17, Kihonda parish = Kyatiri East Ward. 17, KIHONDA LABONGO PDM SACCO = KYATIRI EAST KYATIRI PDM SACCO. 17, Asiimwe Hashim = Kyalisima Julius. 17, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 17, 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 17, Maize = Maize. 17, Project implemente d as planned = Project implemente d as planned. 18, Masind i DLG = Masind i DLG. 18, Kihonda parish = Ntooma parish. 18, KIHONDA LABONGO PDM SACCO = NTOMA
|
73bb3e3b-3ca3-4f85-9ebe-405177f874d5
|
3 |
Appendix 5 (c): Selection and implement prioritized/ flagship projects
Name = . , Parish Name = . , Name of SACCO = . , List of flagship projects per SACCO = . , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = . , Number of PDM enterprises = . , How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 5. , How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = . , How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list =
40
|
af42d16e-163b-4db9-9dfb-1b9b9f63b813
|
3 |
Appendix 27: Failure to carry out Wealth ranking of households
1., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 1., Parish Name = Northern parish. 1., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 1., No. of villages = N/a. 1., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a. 2., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 2., Parish Name = Southern parish. 2., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 2., No. of villages = N/a. 2., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a. 3., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 3., Parish Name = Ward B parish. 3., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 3., No. of villages = N/a. 3., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a. 4., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 4., Parish Name = Ward C parish. 4., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 4., No. of villages = N/a. 4., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a. 5., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 5., Parish Name = Kyembera parish. 5., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 5., No. of villages = N/a. 5., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a. 6., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 6., Parish Name = Kikuube parish. 6., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 6., No. of villages = N/a. 6., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = N/a. 7., Vote name = Kiryandongo DLG. 7., Parish Name = Central parish. 7., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 7., No. of villages = N/a. 7., No. of villages were wealth
|
fee7e01b-8a60-4617-8ed6-0800be015bb9
|
3 |
Appendix 151 selection and implementation of prioritized[flagship projects
Yes. , many enterprises are implementi ng flagship projects How = . , Number of PDM enterpris es = 11. , How many of the enterpris farming enterpris es = 1l. , How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list = . , Vote Name = Muben de DLG. , Parish Name = Madudu. , Name of SACCO = Kansambya Madudu Pdm Sacco. , List of flagship projects per SACCO = Piggery Goat rearing Piggery Coffee growing. , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodit ies selected by the LG? = Yes. , many enterprises are implementi ng flagship projects How = . , Number of PDM enterpris es = 24. , How many of the enterpris farming enterpris es = 24. , How many of the farming enterpris es are from the priority commodi ty list = 24
, 1 = Muben de DLG. , 2 = Kiteera. , 3 = Kiteera Nabingoola Pdm Sacco. , 4 = Poultry Coffee Growing Cattle Keeping. , 5 = Yes. , 6 = . , 7 = 11. , 8 = 11. , 9 = 11. 10, 1 = Muben de DLG. 10, 2 = Makuukuulu. 10, 3 = Makuukuulu Kiruuma Pdm Sacco. 10, 4 = Goat rearing Banana growing Piggery. 10, 5 = Yes. 10, 6 = . 10, 7 = 13. 10, 8 = 13. 10, 9 = 13. , 1 = . , 2 = Makuukuulu. , 3 = . , 4 = Total. , 5 = . , 6 = 13. , 7 = 165. , 8 = 165. , 9 = 165
|
2ab57da6-d8b5-483c-b1b2-361824d34231
|
3 |
Appendix 22: Failure to register Enterprise Groups
89
10. Buliisa DLG, = Mubako. 10. Buliisa DLG, = Mubako Ngwedo PDM Sacco Ltd. 10. Buliisa DLG, Tobacco growing Piggery = Groundnut growing Cassava growing Maize growing Produce dealing Bee keeping. 10. Buliisa DLG, = 100,000,000. Total, = . Total, = . Total, Tobacco growing Piggery = . Total, =
90
|
0acb6995-41a2-4a4b-8e26-963e31d9942a
|
3 |
Appendix 28: Parishes with flagship projects inconsistent with Kiryandongo Selected Priority Commodities
Appendix 29: Households that did not implement items from the priority list
, Parish Name = 1.ern North parish. , Name of SACCO = Northern- Kiryandongo. , List of flagship projects per SACCO = Maize,beans,poutry, Goat. , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. , How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 8. , Number of PDM enterprise s = 14. , How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 8. , How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 8. , Parish Name = 2. hern Sout parish. , Name of SACCO = Southern- Kiryandongo. , List of flagship projects per SACCO = Poutry,maize,soyabean. , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. , How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 6. , Number of PDM enterprise s = 11. , How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 6. , How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 6. , Parish Name = 3. B Ward parish. , Name of SACCO = Ward B- kigumba. , List of flagship projects per SACCO = Beans,tomatoes,cassava,p oultry,Gnuts,Oninon. , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = No. , How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 2. , Number of PDM enterprise s = 17. , How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 2. , How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 2. , Parish Name = 4. C
|
5b1007c3-6d3c-4661-b21b-bc2ec05adf95
|
3 |
Appendix 17: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
projects = 1. 7., Number of PDM enterpri ses = 2. 7., How many of the enterpri ses are farming enterpri ses = 2. 7., How many of the farming enterpri ses are from the priority commod ity list = 1. 8., Vote Name = Kassan da. 8., Parish Name = Kyamuso ta. 8., Name of SACCO = Kyamusot a-Kiganda TC. 8., List of flagsh ip proje cts per SACC O Not = Not provid ed. 8., Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties selected by the LG? = No. 8., How many enterprise s are implemen ting flagship projects = 1. 8., Number of PDM enterpri ses = 2. 8., How many of the enterpri ses are farming enterpri ses = 2. 8., How many of the farming enterpri ses are from the priority commod ity list = 1. 9., Vote Name = Kassan da. 9., Parish Name = Kyoga. 9., Name of SACCO = Kyoga- Kamuli. 9., List of flagsh ip proje cts per SACC O Not = Not provid. 9., Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties selected by the LG? = No. 9., How many enterprise s are implemen ting flagship projects = 1. 9., Number of PDM enterpri ses = 2. 9., How many of the enterpri ses are farming enterpri ses = 2. 9., How many of the farming enterpri ses are from the priority commod ity list = 1. 10., Vote Name = Kassan da. 10., Parish Name = Kamusu. 10., Name of SACCO = Kamusu- Kiganda TC. 10., List of flagsh ip proje cts per SACC O Not = ed Not provid ed. 10., Are the flagship projects consisten t with the priority commodi ties selected by the LG? = No. 10., How many enterprise s are implemen ting flagship projects = 1. 10., Number of PDM enterpri ses = 2. 10., How many of the enterpri ses are farming enterpri ses = 2. 10., How many of the farming enterpri ses are from the priority commod ity list = 1
54
|
c59a9304-0de6-4013-8f2c-668783d681fe
|
3 |
Appendix 8: selection and implement prioritized/flagship projects
9., Lira = Lira. 9., Obot = Olilo. 9., Obot - Barr = Olilo - Itek. 9., CASSAVA MAIZE PIGGERY POULTRY FRUIT COFFEE FISH FARMING BEANS = MAIZE PIGGERY POULTRY FRUIT. 9., No = No. 9., 0 = 0. 9., 10 = 19. 9., 10 = 19. 9., 0 = 0. 10., Lira = Lira. 10., Obot = Abutoadi. 10., Obot - Barr = Abutoadi - Wiodyek. 10., CASSAVA MAIZE PIGGERY POULTRY FRUIT COFFEE FISH FARMING BEANS = MAIZE PIGGERY POULTRY FRUIT COFFEE FISH. 10., No = No. 10., 0 = 0. 10., 10 = 25. 10., 10 = 25. 10., 0 = 0
48
|
c2293d9a-6dec-4c3c-88e7-3c993ae2b441
|
3 |
Appendix: 7 Implementation of Ineligible, and Non-Existent Projects
code.Vote code = 878. 40, Entity Name.Entity Name = Kyotera DLG. 40, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects = 20. 40, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects = 10. 40, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.that had non-existent projects. = 0. 40, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.beneficiaries that had non- existent projects. = 0. 41, Vote code.Vote code = 879. 41, Entity Name.Entity Name = Lamwo DLG. 41, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects = 2. 41, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects = 2. 41, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.that had non-existent projects. = 1. 41, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.beneficiaries that had non- existent projects. = 1. 42, Vote code.Vote code = 881. 42, Entity Name.Entity Name = Luuka DLG. 42, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects = 2. 42, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects = 1. 42, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.that had non-existent projects. = 0. 42, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.beneficiaries that had non- existent projects. = 0. 43, Vote code.Vote
|
2a6c828a-53cf-4784-ba2c-f69ea7fab5ec
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 68, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 69, Vote code = 866. 69, Entity Name = KisoroDLG. 69, No. of priorities = 6. 69, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 5. 69, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 6. 69, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 69, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 70, Vote code = 868. 70, Entity Name = KitgumDLG. 70, No. of priorities = -. 70, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 70, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 70, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 70, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 71, Vote code = 869. 71, Entity Name = KobokoDLG. 71, No. of priorities = 8. 71, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 8. 71, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 71, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = 8. 71, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 72, Vote code = 870. 72, Entity Name = KoleDLG. 72, No. of priorities = -. 72, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 72, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 72, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 72, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 73, Vote code = 872. 73, Entity Name = KumiDLG. 73, No. of priorities = -. 73, No. of Sub
|
18a035ee-fb62-4bae-82a9-4b18d313cc04
|
3 |
Appendix 10: PDM Inspection
7., a dlg = . 7., Mityebiri = Habinez a T. 7., kigenya Kasaali = Kisuula kasasa pdm sacco. 7., Habineza T = Lubega S. 7., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 7., Banana growing = Coffee. 7., Kyoter = kasasa. 8., a dlg = Kyoter a dlg. 8., Mityebiri = Mityebiri. 8., kigenya Kasaali = Mityebiri kasasa pdm sacco. 8., Habineza T = Nampeera B. 8., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 8., Banana growing = aquacultur e. 8., Kyoter = . 9., a dlg = . 9., Mityebiri = Lubega. 9., kigenya Kasaali = Nabigasa - nabigasa pdm sacco. 9., Habineza T = Namujuzi M. 9., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 9., Banana growing = Piggery. 9., Kyoter = kasasa S. 10., a dlg = . 10., Mityebiri = Mityebiri. 10., kigenya Kasaali = Mayanja kakuuto pdm sacco. 10., Habineza T = Mayiga N. 10., 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. 10., Banana growing = Coffee. 10., Kyoter = Kyoter a dlg
51
The
farmer
bought
Fertilisers
,
seedlings
and
mulches
were
purchase
d
Fish
farming
2 piglets
were
purchase
d and
feeds
added to
what he
already
had.
Purchase
d
fertilisers,
mulching,
and 80
new
seedlings
|
9601e471-c470-4fca-8c0d-a919f6557812
|
3 |
Appendix 6: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
PDM SACCO. 10., List of flagship projects per SACCO = NALONDO Groundnuts Piggery, Poultry, and Soya beans, Dairy. 10., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Yes. 10., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 10. 10., Number PDM enterpris e s = 10. 10., of How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 10. 10., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 2. , Vote Name = . , Parish Name = . , Name of SACCO = . , List of flagship projects per SACCO = Total. , Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = . , How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = . , Number PDM enterpris e s = . , of How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 99. , How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 16
46
|
21f03be1-fbc7-428c-9a10-920e6cbb15d6
|
3 |
Appendix 15: Parishes that selected flagship projects that were inconsistent with the LG selected priority commodities
maize 100,000,000. Masindi DLG, 100,000,000 = 14. Masindi DLG, Masindi DLG = Katugo parish. Masindi DLG, Kabango ward = KATUUGO KIRUULI PDM SACCO. Masindi DLG, KABANGO KABANGO PDM SACCO = Beans, g. nut,. Masindi DLG, Piggery, produce dealing = soya beans, bee keeping, piggery, 100,000,000. Masindi DLG, 100,000,000 = 15. 16 Masindi DLG, Masindi DLG = Kibangya parish. 16 Masindi DLG, Kabango ward = KIBANGYA KIMENGO PDM. 16 Masindi DLG, KABANGO KABANGO PDM SACCO = SACCO. 16 Masindi DLG, Piggery, produce dealing = Goat raring,
beans, cassava 100,000,000. 16 Masindi DLG, 100,000,000 = . Masindi DLG, Masindi DLG = Kibibira parish. Masindi DLG, Kabango ward = KIBIBIRA KIRUULI PDM SACCO. Masindi DLG, KABANGO KABANGO PDM SACCO = . Masindi DLG, Piggery, produce dealing = Beans, g. nut, soya beans, bee keeping, piggery, 100,000,000. Masindi DLG, 100,000,000 = 17. Masindi DLG, Masindi DLG = Kigulya parish. Masindi DLG, Kabango ward = KIGUULYA MIIRYA PDM SACCO. Masindi DLG, KABANGO KABANGO PDM SACCO = . Masindi DLG, Piggery, produce dealing = sun flower, beans, produce dealers,
|
07277d6e-e0cf-4217-bf36-203c35ecbc67
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
code = 835. 49, Entity Name = IbandaDLG. 49, No. of priorities = 0. 49, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 13. 49, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 0. 49, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 49, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 50, Vote code = 837. 50, Entity Name = IsingiroDLG. 50, No. of priorities = 0. 50, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 0. 50, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 0. 50, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 50, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 51, Vote code = 838. 51, Entity Name = JinjaDLG. 51, No. of priorities = -. 51, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 7. 51, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 51, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 51, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 52, Vote code = 839. 52, Entity Name = KaabongDLG. 52, No. of priorities = -. 52, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 52, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 52, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 52, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 53, Vote code = 895. 53, Entity Name = MorotoDLG. 53, No. of priorities = -. 53, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 6. 53, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work
|
aa64da58-4d9a-44cd-89d2-ec581d93fe59
|
3 |
Appendix VI: Automatic promotion policy
Arrangement on automatic promotion = Merit. 16, Name of school = Kayunga Mixed P.S.. 16, District = Kayunga District. 16, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Merit. 17, Name of school = Police Primary School. 17, District = Gulu city. 17, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Merit. 18, Name of school = ABIA P.S.. 18, District = Alebtong District. 18, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 19, Name of school = ABIRA PARENTS P.S.. 19, District = Arua District. 19, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 20, Name of school = ARAPAI P.S. 20, District = Soroti city. 20, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 21, Name of school = ASURU PRIMARY SCHOOL. 21, District = Arua city. 21, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 22, Name of school = BAKKA PS.. 22, District = Wakiso District. 22, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 23, Name of school = BIRAMBO PS.. 23, District = Kabale District. 23, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 24, Name of school = Bugema COU P.S.. 24, District = Luwero District. 24, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 25, Name of school = BUGESO BAPTIST PS.. 25, District = Bugiri District. 25, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 26, Name of school = Bukanaga P.S. 26, District = Mityana Municipal Council. 26, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 27, Name of school = Bukasa RIC. 27, District = Luwero District. 27, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 28, Name of school = Bumwangu P.S. 28, District = Bugiri District. 28, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 29, Name of school = BUTEMBE P S. 29, District = Mitooma District. 29, Arrangement on automatic promotion = Parent's discussion. 30, Name of school = BUZENGA P.S.. 30, District = Rubirizi District. 30,
|
7120485b-ff7b-422b-9ef5-a07fe6d59856
|
3 |
Appendix 17: Selection and Implementation of Prioritized/Flagship Projects
1., = NAP AK DLG. 1., = MORULIN GA. 1., = MORULIN GA. 1., SACCO = Produce dealers, sorghum and green gram growing, piggery, vegetabl e and nursery growing, maize,. 1., the priority commodi ties selected by the = NO. 1., ting flagship projects = 10. 1., = 12. 1., farming enterpri ses = 10. 1., ses are from the priority commo dity list = 10. 2., = NAP AK DLG. 2., = NAKICHU MET. 2., = NAKICHU MET. 2., SACCO = Sun flower, Green. 2., the priority commodi ties selected by the = NO. 2., ting flagship projects = 2. 2., = 9. 2., farming enterpri ses = 9. 2., ses are from the priority commo dity list = 2. 3., = NAP AK DLG. 3., = SENIOR QUARTER S WARD. 3., = SENIOR QUARTER S WARD. 3., SACCO = maize Sun flower, Green gram, sim-sim and. 3., the priority commodi ties selected by the = NO. 3., ting flagship projects = 0. 3., = 14. 3., farming enterpri ses = 14. 3., ses are from the priority commo dity list = 2. 4., = NAP AK DLG. 4., = DARTICS WARD. 4., = DARTICS WARD. 4., SACCO = maize Sun flower, Green gram, sim-sim. 4., the priority commodi ties selected by the = NO. 4., ting flagship projects = 0. 4., = 6. 4., farming enterpri ses = 6. 4., ses are from the priority commo dity list = 0. 5., = NAP AK DLG. 5., = LOKALI. 5., = LOKALI. 5., SACCO = maize Produce dealers, sorghum and green gram growing, piggery, vegetabl e and nursery. 5., the priority commodi ties selected by the = NO. 5., ting flagship projects = 0. 5., = 17. 5., farming enterpri ses = 17. 5., ses are from the priority
|
82e3dd07-0a2b-47c3-983a-2c104cc6316a
|
3 |
Appendix 9: Wealth ranking of households
1, Vote Name = Ibanda. 1, Parish Name = Rwengwe. 1, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 1, No. of villages = 11. 1, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 1, Remarks = No ranking done. 2, Vote Name = . 2, Parish Name = Mushunga. 2, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 2, No. of villages = 10. 2, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 2, Remarks = No ranking done. 3, Vote Name = . 3, Parish Name = Muziza. 3, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 3, No. of villages = 11. 3, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 3, Remarks = No ranking done. 4, Vote Name = . 4, Parish Name = Irwaniro. 4, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 4, No. of villages = 7. 4, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 4, Remarks = No ranking done. 5, Vote Name = . 5, Parish Name = Kashozi. 5, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 5, No. of villages = 11. 5, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 5, Remarks = No ranking done. 6, Vote Name = . 6, Parish Name = Kakinga. 6, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 6, No. of villages = 16. 6, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 6, Remarks = No ranking done. 7, Vote Name = . 7, Parish Name = Nyantsimbo. 7, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 7, No. of villages = 24. 7, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 7, Remarks = No ranking done. 8, Vote Name = . 8, Parish Name = Kihani. 8, Was wealth ranking
|
0f97e058-aad5-4731-9284-b264e20d4efe
|
3 |
priority commodities
Beans , Onion ,. 74, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 75, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 75, Lwansama Parish = Kasekka Parish. 75, Lwansama- Wattuba PDM SACCO = Kasekka-Kisala PDM SACCO. 75, Piggery, Beans = , Beans , Goat rearing, Poultry. 75, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 76, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 76, Lwansama Parish = Sirimula Parish. 76, Lwansama- Wattuba PDM SACCO = Sirimula-Ntwetwe PDM SACCO. 76, Piggery, Beans = Poultry. 76, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 77, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 77, Lwansama Parish = Kabuye Parish. 77, Lwansama- Wattuba PDM SACCO = Kabuye-Ntwetwe PDM SACCO. 77, Piggery, Beans = Poultry, farming, Goat rearing, farming, Beans. 77, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000. 78, Kyankwanzi DLG = Kyankwanzi DLG. 78, Lwansama Parish = Kitabona Parish. 78, Lwansama- Wattuba PDM SACCO = Kitabona-Ntwetwe PDM SACCO. 78, Piggery, Beans = Goat rearing. 78, 100,000,000 = 100,000,000
29
|
01faee81-4068-4cb6-8f8e-dba4771d746e
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
code = 896. 87, Entity Name = MoyoDLG. 87, No. of priorities = -. 87, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 87, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 87, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 87, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 88, Vote code = 897. 88, Entity Name = MpigiDLG. 88, No. of priorities = -. 88, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 88, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 88, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 88, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 89, Vote code = 898. 89, Entity Name = MubendeDLG. 89, No. of priorities = 20. 89, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 10. 89, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 20. 89, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 89, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 90, Vote code = 900. 90, Entity Name = NabilatukDLG. 90, No. of priorities = -. 90, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 6. 90, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 90, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 90, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 91, Vote code = 901. 91, Entity Name = NakapiripiritDLG. 91, No. of priorities = -. 91, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 9. 91, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work
|
06e36ac3-9f4a-447e-9a3c-7066b4995667
|
3 |
Appendix 8: selection and implement prioritized/flagship projects
4., Lira = . 4., = Acutkumu. 4., = Acutkumu - Ayami. 4., COFFEE FISH FARMING BEANS CASSAVA = MAIZE PIGGERY POULTRY FRUIT COFFEE FISH. 4., = No. 4., = 0. 4., = 28. 4., = 28. 4., = 0. 5., Lira = Lira. 5., = Ogur. 5., = Ogur -Ogur. 5., COFFEE FISH FARMING BEANS CASSAVA = MAIZE PIGGERY POULTRY FRUIT COFFEE. 5., = No. 5., = 0. 5., = 18. 5., = 18. 5., = 0. 6., Lira = Lira. 6., = Alworo. 6., = Alworo- Amach T.C. 6., COFFEE FISH FARMING BEANS CASSAVA = MAIZE PIGGERY POULTRY FRUIT COFFEE. 6., = No. 6., = 0. 6., = 11. 6., = 11. 6., = 0. 7., Lira = Lira. 7., = Onyakede. 7., = Onyakede - Amach. 7., COFFEE FISH FARMING BEANS CASSAVA = MAIZE PIGGERY POULTRY FRUIT COFFEE. 7., = No. 7., = 0. 7., = 12. 7., = 12. 7., = 0
47
|
4d03fe51-2bdf-4bef-889f-336967bd3831
|
3 |
Appendix 29: Physical Inspection of Household Project Implementation
, Kibingo = Kibingo. , Kibingo Bwamiramira PDM SACCO LTD = Kibingo Bwamiramira PDM SACCO LTD. , Francis Batekane = Kunihira Grace. , 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. , Vegetables = Vegetables. , 6 = 7 Kibaale DLG
109
Funds diverted to maize growing
Funds
diverted to
piggery
, Kiribanga = Kiribanga. , Kiribanga Bwamiramira PDM SACCO LTD = Kiribanga Bwamiramira PDM SACCO LTD. , Matovu Andrew = Tumuhekyi Jenina. , 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. , Coffee = Poultry. , 8 Kibaale = 9 Kibaale DLG 10 Kibaale DLG. , Project implemented as planned = Funds diverted to piggery. , Kiribanga = . , Kiribanga Bwamiramira PDM SACCO LTD = Nyamugura Nyamugura Kabasekende PSM SACCO LTD. , Matovu Andrew = Kabonesa Letesia. , 1,000,000 = 1,000,000. , Coffee = Onions. , 8 Kibaale = . , Project implemented as planned = Diverted funds to piggery
110
|
bcede7a1-91e9-4465-9288-6cebcbc4daee
|
3 |
I noted that the following;
10 parishes selected flagship projects that were inconsistent with the LG selected priority commodities.
60 out of 95 farmer enterprise/households implemented projects that are not from the priority commodity list. Appendix 20 refers.
Failure to select and implement prioritized projects may undermine to achieve pillar objectives.
The Accounting Officer explained that PDM beneficiaries implemented different projects from the earlier priority enterprises due to delayed disbursement of funds and it affected mostly crop enterprises which are season based .
|
9d259fa1-9a24-491e-bee4-11e63c006fc1
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = 5. 110, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 111, Vote code = 924. 111, Entity Name = RukungiriDLG. 111, No. of priorities = 0. 111, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 0. 111, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 0. 111, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 111, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 112, Vote code = 925. 112, Entity Name = RwamparaDLG. 112, No. of priorities = 0. 112, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 0. 112, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 0. 112, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 112, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = -. 113, Vote code = 929. 113, Entity Name = SironkoDLG. 113, No. of priorities = 224. 113, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 224. 113, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = 42. 113, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = 182. 113, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 114, Vote code = 930. 114, Entity Name = SorotiDLG. 114, No. of priorities = -. 114, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 114, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 114, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 114, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 115, Vote
|
7c26d9e3-0a0f-4173-a2f8-b4854726a1ec
|
3 |
Appendix II: Sampled Schools
40, 1 = Kyakatono Primary school. 40, 2 = Old Curriculum. 41, 1 = Mijale Primary school. 41, 2 = Old Curriculum. 42, 1 = Sikye Primary school. 42, 2 = Old Curriculum. 43, 1 = Swalihin Primary school. 43, 2 = Old Curriculum. 44, 1 = Bakka Primary School. 44, 2 = Old Curriculum. 45, 1 = Pandwong Primary school. 45, 2 = Old Curriculum. 46, 1 = Marine Base Army Primary School. 46, 2 = Old Curriculum. 47, 1 = Melissa Primary School. 47, 2 = Old Curriculum. 48, 1 = Teokole Primary School. 48, 2 = Old Curriculum. 49, 1 = Kireka UMEA PrimarySchool. 49, 2 = Old Curriculum. 50, 1 = Luwala Primary School. 50, 2 = Both Old and Abridged Curriculum. 51, 1 = Naminya Church of Uganda Primary School. 51, 2 = Both Old and Abridged Curriculum. 52, 1 = Arapai Primary School. 52, 2 = Both Old and Abridged Curriculum. 54, 1 = Nyakahanga Primary School. 54, 2 = Both Old and Abridged Curriculum. , 1 = . , 2 = Both Old and Abridged Curriculum. 55 56, 1 = Abia Primary school Jamula Primary school. 55 56, 2 = Both Old and Abridged Curriculum. 57, 1 = Kabingo Primary School. 57, 2 = No Curriculum
|
fd57ef5d-c59c-47ef-adb5-3853b298a33b
|
3 |
Appendix 20: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
Sheep rearing, Goat rearing. 3., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Maize No. 3., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 12. 3., Number of PDM enterpris es = 12. 3., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 5. 3., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 4. 4., Vote Name = KATAKWI DLG. 4., Parish Name = Aliakamer Amusia. 4., Name of SACCO = Pdm Sacco Limited Amusia Amusia Pdm Sacco Limited. 4., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sheep rearing, Piggery. 4., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Poultry, No. 4., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 11. 4., Number of PDM enterpris es = 11. 4., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 0. 4., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 0. 5., Vote Name = KATAKWI DLG. 5., Parish Name = Atorom Obongut. 5., Name of SACCO = Atorom Obongut Ward Toroma Town Council Pdm. 5., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sheep rearing. Cassava growing, Green Gram, Produce buying and selling. 5., Are the flagship projects consistent with the priority commodities selected by the LG? = Poultry, No. 5., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 8. 5., Number of PDM enterpris es = 8. 5., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 2. 5., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 1. 6., Vote Name = KATAKWI DLG. 6., Parish Name = Ward Central Ward. 6., Name of SACCO = Sacco Limited Central Ward Usuk Town Council Pdm Sacco Limited. 6., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Goat rearing, Sheep rearing, Piggery,
|
579a273a-087d-495c-bdbf-9c6d4f2364d5
|
3 |
Appendix 15: Failure to select and implement prioritized/flagship projects
9., 1 = Kyegegw a- Kyegegw a SACCO. 9., 2 = Kyegegwa Parish. 9., 3 = Kyegegwa Kyegegwa PDM SACCO. 9., 4 = Piggery, Matooke, Goat rearing, poultry, beans, diary & maize. 9., 5 = . 9., 6 = 28. 9., 7 = 28. 9., 8 = 21. 9., 9 = 5. 10., 1 = Nyamuh. 10., 2 = Nyamuhan ami Parish. 10., 3 = Nyamuhana. 10., 4 = Coffee, banana,. 10., 5 = no. 10., 6 = 17. 10., 7 = 17. 10., 8 = 12. 10., 9 = 5. 10., 1 = anami- Kyegegw a SACCO. 10., 2 = . 10., 3 = mi Kyegegwa PDM SACCO. 10., 4 = diary, vegetable & goat rearing. 10., 5 = no. 10., 6 = 17. 10., 7 = 17. 10., 8 = 12. 10., 9 = 5
|
91ed1f6b-d0ef-4298-ac71-d28a6f3ae915
|
3 |
Appendix 5 (g); Selection and implementation of prioritized/flagship projects
S/C PDM SACCO = Nyakisi- Nyakisi S/C PDM SACCO. 9., Irish Potatoes, Coffee and Maize = Piggery, Coffee and Irish Potatoes. 9., Yes = Yes. 9., 1 = 2. 9., 3 = 3. 9., 3 = 2. 9., 1 = 1. 9., 3 = 3. 9., Yes = Yes. 10., Kyenjoj o DLG = Kyenjoj o DLG. 10., Rwamukoora Parish = Kabatooro Parish. 10., Rwamukoora -Katooke S/C PDM SACCO = Kabatooro- Nyakisi S/C PDM SACCO. 10., Irish Potatoes, Coffee and Maize = Coffee, Poultry and Irish. 10., Yes = Yes. 10., 1 = 1. 10., 3 = 3. 10., 3 = 2. 10., 1 = 1. 10., 3 = 3. 10., Yes = Yes
77
|
a1ad2565-9383-470c-b6b9-287f2060c74a
|
3 |
Appendix 22: Failure to register Enterprise Groups
Appendix 25: Parishes with flagship projects inconsistent with Hoima Selected Priority Commodities
Produce business. 5., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 6., Name of HLG = Buliisa DLG. 6., Parish = Kigwera. 6., Name of PDM SACCO = Kigwera Kigwera PDM Sacco Ltd. 6., Inconsistent Flagship projects = Cassava Growing Piggery Poultry rearing Maize growing Fishery. 6., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 7., Name of HLG = Buliisa DLG. 7., Parish = Kisansya. 7., Name of PDM SACCO = Kisansya Kigwera PDM Sacco Ltd. 7., Inconsistent Flagship projects = Cassava Growing Tomato growing Piggery Poultry rearing Fishery. 7., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 8., Name of HLG = Buliisa DLG. 8., Parish = Garasoya. 8., Name of PDM SACCO = Garasoya Kihungya PDM Sacco Ltd. 8., Inconsistent Flagship projects = Goat rearing Beans growing Maize growing. 8., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 9., Name of HLG = Buliisa DLG. 9., Parish = Waaki. 9., Name of PDM SACCO = Waaki Kihungya PDM Sacco Ltd. 9., Inconsistent Flagship projects = Goat rearing Maize growing. 9., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000
|
e9475575-2333-4775-8377-fa6800b23bf1
|
3 |
Appendix 25: Wealth Ranking of Households
Kibaale DLG, Vote Name = Kahyooro. Kibaale DLG, Parish Name = No. Kibaale DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 6. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages = 0. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No wealth ranking was done. Kibaale DLG, Remarks = 1. Kibaale DLG, Vote Name = Kibingo. Kibaale DLG, Parish Name = No. Kibaale DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 5. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages = 0. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No wealth ranking was done. Kibaale DLG, Remarks = 2. Kibaale DLG, Vote Name = Kiribanga. Kibaale DLG, Parish Name = No. Kibaale DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 4. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages = 0. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No wealth ranking was done. Kibaale DLG, Remarks = 3. Kibaale DLG, Vote Name = Kabasekende. Kibaale DLG, Parish Name = No. Kibaale DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 8. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages = 0. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No wealth ranking was done. Kibaale DLG, Remarks = 4. Kibaale DLG, Vote Name = Nyamugura. Kibaale DLG, Parish Name = No. Kibaale DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 8. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages = 0. Kibaale DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No wealth ranking. Kibaale DLG, Remarks = 5. Kibaale DLG, Vote Name = Kabaleega. Kibaale DLG, Parish Name = No. Kibaale DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out
|
7d9b6c78-a93e-43e1-961b-26d6131bbc59
|
3 |
Appendix 16 ; Selection and Implementation of Prioritized/Flagship Projects
commodity list = Information not availed during audit. 1., Vote Name = . 1., Parish Name = Pangira. 1., Name of SACCO = Pangira Lokung Parish. 1., List of flagship projects per SACCO = Sim sim,Soya beans,Maize,piggery,sunflower. 1., Are the flagship projects consiste nt with the priority commo dities selecte d by the LG? = NO. 1., How many enterprises are implementing flagship projects = 12. 1., Number of PDM enterprises = 12. 1., How many of the enterprises are farming enterprises = 12. 1., How many of the farming enterprises are from the priority commodity list = 12
72
|
2868257e-2216-4db5-bbb0-71b6bfb102fb
|
3 |
Appendix 13: Failure to carry out Wealth ranking of households
1, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 1, Parish Name = Mataagi ward. 1, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 1, No. of villages = 3. 1, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 2, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 2, Parish Name = Kateera ward. 2, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 2, No. of villages = 5. 2, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 3, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 3, Parish Name = Kyomya. 3, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 3, No. of villages = 6. 3, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 4, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 4, Parish Name = Kayunga. 4, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 4, No. of villages = 4. 4, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 5, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 5, Parish Name = Kitagenda ward. 5, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 5, No. of villages = 4. 5, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 6, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 6, Parish Name = Lwamata Central ward. 6, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 6, No. of villages = 4. 6, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 7, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 7, Parish Name = Buninga. 7, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 7, No. of villages = 7. 7, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 8, Vote Name = Kiboga DLG. 8, Parish Name = Kyekumbya. 8, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 8, No. of villages = 5. 8, No. of villages where wealth ranking was
|
5c7af15d-7b23-4c09-a975-9cffa44959c6
|
3 |
Appendix 14: Wealth Ranking of Households
PDM SACCO. 6, No. of villages = 6. 6, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No. 6, Remarks = No wealth ranking was conducted. 7, Vote Name = Masindi DLG. 7, Parish Name = Kitonozi parish. 7, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = KITONOZI BIKONZI PDM SACCO. 7, No. of villages = 6. 7, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No. 7, Remarks = No wealth ranking was conducted. 8, Vote Name = Masindi DLG. 8, Parish Name = Kyakamese East parish. 8, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = KYAKAMESE EAST PAKANYI PDM SACCO. 8, No. of villages = 8. 8, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No. 8, Remarks = No wealth ranking was conducted. 9, Vote Name = Masindi DLG. 9, Parish Name = Kyatiri East Ward. 9, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = KYATIRI EAST KYATIRI PDM SACCO. 9, No. of villages = 6. 9, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No. 9, Remarks = No wealth ranking was conducted. 10, Vote Name = Masindi DLG. 10, Parish Name = Ntooma parish. 10, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = NTOMA BWIJANGA PDM SACCO. 10, No. of villages = 15. 10, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = No. 10, Remarks = No wealth ranking was conducted. , Vote Name = . , Parish Name = TOTAL. , Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = . , No. of villages = 77. , No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = . , Remarks =
|
379c55e2-0aea-4785-b2cb-d5de928a22b7
|
3 |
Appendix: 7 Implementation of Ineligible, and Non-Existent Projects
code = 860. 31, Entity Name.Entity Name = Kibale DLG. 31, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects = 7. 31, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects = 5. 31, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.that had non-existent projects. = 1. 31, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.beneficiaries that had non- existent projects. = 1. 32, Vote code.Vote code = 861. 32, Entity Name.Entity Name = Kiboga DLG. 32, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects = 1. 32, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects = 1. 32, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.that had non-existent projects. = 0. 32, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.beneficiaries that had non- existent projects. = 0. 33, Vote code.Vote code = 862. 33, Entity Name.Entity Name = Kibuku DLG. 33, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of beneficiaries that implemented ineligible projects = 2. 33, Beneficiaries that implemented different projects.No. of PDM SACCOs with beneficiaries that had implemented ineligible projects = 2. 33, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.that had non-existent projects. = 0. 33, Beneficiaries that had non-existent projects No. of beneficiaries No. of PDM SACCOs with.beneficiaries that had non- existent projects. = 0. 34, Vote code.Vote
|
485f1c12-202e-447d-9179-5c92d56b245a
|
3 |
Appendix: 5 (f): Irregularities in project implementation
Atiabar North, 1 = Atiabar North Bungatira. Atiabar North, 2 = Ojok Walter. Atiabar North, 3 = 1,000,000. Atiabar North, 4 = 1,000,000. Atiabar North, 5 = Poultry. Atiabar North, 6 = 1.. Atiabar North, 7 = Ojok claimed to have sold 19 chickens on the 19/08/2022 and planning to buy the second batch however no accountabilities were availed to confirm his assertion.. , 1 = . , 2 = Okeny Charles. , 3 = 1,000,000. , 4 = 1,000,000. , 5 = Poultry. , 6 = 2.. , 7 = He had 13 chickens by the time of inspection. No accountability on how he spent the money. , 1 = . , 2 = Alanyo Maria. , 3 = 1,000,000. , 4 = 1,000,000. , 5 = Poultry. , 6 = 3.. , 7 = She used part of the money for the right purpose, she bought 30 chickens, and She diverted the UGX 100,000 to buy rice seeds for her rice garden.. , 1 = . , 2 = Anena Nancy. , 3 = 1,000,000. , 4 = 1,000,000. , 5 = Poultry. , 6 = 4.. , 7 = By the time of the inspection, Anena Nancy claimed that she had sold the first batch and planning to buy the second batch.
43
|
25287ded-7043-4744-a00d-19fc1bbb55c5
|
3 |
Appendices Appendix 1: Alignment of the LGs and KCCA Work Plans and Budgets to the PDM
code = 932. 115, Entity Name = TororoDLG. 115, No. of priorities = -. 115, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 30. 115, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 115, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 115, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 116, Vote code = 933. 116, Entity Name = WakisoDLG. 116, No. of priorities = -. 116, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 116, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 116, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 116, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = No. 117, Vote code = 934. 117, Entity Name = YumbeDLG. 117, No. of priorities = 21. 117, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 26. 117, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 117, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = 21. 117, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = -. 118, Vote code = 935. 118, Entity Name = ZomboDLG. 118, No. of priorities = 12. 118, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = 15. 118, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 118, No. of priorities not incorporated into the budget/work plan = 12. 118, Was there evidence of identifying priorities at parish level? = Yes. 119, Vote code = 862. 119, Entity Name = KibukuDLG. 119, No. of priorities = -. 119, No. of Sub Counties/Division/Town Councils = -. 119, No. of priorities incorporated into the budget/work plan = -. 119, No. of
|
899bf37b-6343-437d-bf07-145cc3130753
|
3 |
Appendix 11: Utilization of PRF at Household Level
Kamwenge DLG, Kebising o. = Rukuny u. Kamwenge DLG, Kebisingo- Kabambiro. = Rukunyu- Rukunyu. Kamwenge DLG, Birungi Roy.Jackson Kizza = Abdallah Christopher. Kamwenge DLG, 1,000,000.1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Kamwenge DLG, 1,000,000.1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Kamwenge DLG, Coffee.Goat rearing = Coffee. Kamwenge DLG, 3. DLG. = 4.. Kamwenge DLG, She used part of the money for a different project(piggery).Implemented the funded project = Did not implement a project and said he used the money to buy pesticides, manure, spraying pump and. Kamwenge DLG, Kebising o. = Rukuny u. Kamwenge DLG, Kebisingo- Kabambiro. = Rukunyu- Rukunyu. Kamwenge DLG, Birungi Roy.Jackson Kizza = Kwesiga Simon. Kamwenge DLG, 1,000,000.1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Kamwenge DLG, 1,000,000.1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Kamwenge DLG, Coffee.Goat rearing = Poultry. Kamwenge DLG, 3. DLG. = . Kamwenge DLG, She used part of the money for a different project(piggery).Implemented the funded project = Implemented the. Kamwenge DLG, Kebising o. = Businge. Kamwenge DLG, Kebisingo- Kabambiro. = Businge- Kamwenge. Kamwenge DLG, Birungi Roy.Jackson Kizza = Sabastiano Nkabimanya. Kamwenge DLG, 1,000,000.1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Kamwenge DLG, 1,000,000.1,000,000 = 1,000,000. Kamwenge DLG, Coffee.Goat rearing = Goat rearing. Kamwenge DLG, 3. DLG. = 5.. Kamwenge DLG, She used part of the money for a different project(piggery).Implemented the funded project = Implemented the funded project
49
|
20c6bf57-4b64-4fcc-840a-05f3beeeec00
|
3 |
Appendix 7f: Wealth ranking of households
1., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 1., Parish Name = Muyenga. 1., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 1., No. of villages = 5. 1., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = None. 1., Remarks = Selection of beneficiaries was done by the subsistence households themselves at village level.. 2., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 2., Parish Name = Nyabbani. 2., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 2., No. of villages = 6. 2., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = None. 2., Remarks = Selection of beneficiaries was done by the subsistence households themselves at village level.. 3., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 3., Parish Name = Kabujogera. 3., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 3., No. of villages = 7. 3., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = None. 3., Remarks = Selection of beneficiaries was done by the subsistence households themselves at village level.. 4., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 4., Parish Name = Kantozi. 4., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 4., No. of villages = 5. 4., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = None. 4., Remarks = Selection of beneficiaries was done by the subsistence households themselves at village level.. 5., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 5., Parish Name = Ntara. 5., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 5., No. of villages = 5. 5., No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = None. 5., Remarks = Selection of beneficiaries was done by the subsistence households themselves at village level.. 6., Vote Name = Kitagwenda. 6., Parish Name = Kicwamba. 6., Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 6., No. of villages = 5. 6., No. of villages were wealth ranking was
|
c4a295aa-67f2-4a3f-a4fd-d4af43a25328
|
3 |
Appendix 4(b): Existence and functionality of the parish development committee
parish or ward elected under sec. 25(4) of the National Council for older Persons Act, 2013) Yes Yes = Yes. 22, = . 22, = . 22, = . 22, = . 22, = 750,000. 22, = No. 23 24, PARUBANGA = PABUGA WARD KIBOGI WARD. 23 24, Chairperson of persons with Disability Council, Chairperson of the ruling Party at the Parish, and Chairperson of older persons executive committee the parish or ward elected under sec. 25(4) of the National Council for older Persons Act, 2013) Yes Yes = Yes Yes. 23 24, = Yes Yes. 23 24, = No No. 23 24, = No. 23 24, = No. 23 24, = 750,000. 23 24, = No No. 25, PARUBANGA = BIBIA WARD. 25, Chairperson of persons with Disability Council, Chairperson of the ruling Party at the Parish, and Chairperson of older persons executive committee the parish or ward elected under sec. 25(4) of the National Council for older Persons Act, 2013) Yes Yes = Yes. 25, = Yes. 25, = No. 25, = No No. 25, = No No. 25, = 750,000 750,000. 25, = No. 26, PARUBANGA = KALADIMA WARD. 26, Chairperson of persons with Disability Council, Chairperson of the ruling Party at the Parish, and Chairperson of older persons executive committee the parish or ward elected under sec. 25(4) of the National Council for older Persons Act, 2013) Yes Yes = Yes. 26, = Yes. 26, = No. 26, = No. 26, = No. 26, = 750,000. 26, = No
10
|
8ceabe93-25f7-4b39-8883-a61f3fb99f65
|
3 |
Appendix 5 (b): Wealth Ranking of Households
1, Vote Name = Gulu DLG. 1, Parish Name = Paduny. 1, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 1, No. of villages = 3. 1, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 3. 1, Remarks = No evidence was availed to confirm that wealth ranking was carried out.. 2, Vote Name = Gulu DLG. 2, Parish Name = Burcoro. 2, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 2, No. of villages = 2. 2, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 2. 2, Remarks = No evidence was availed to confirm that wealth ranking was actually carried out.. 3, Vote Name = Gulu DLG. 3, Parish Name = Pageya. 3, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 3, No. of villages = 3. 3, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 3. 3, Remarks = No evidence was availed to confirm that wealth ranking was actually carried out.. 4, Vote Name = Gulu DLG. 4, Parish Name = Atiabar North. 4, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 4, No. of villages = 4. 4, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 4. 4, Remarks = No evidence was availed to confirm that wealth ranking was actually carried out.. 5, Vote Name = Gulu DLG. 5, Parish Name = Laban. 5, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 5, No. of villages = 5. 5, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 5. 5, Remarks = No evidence was availed to confirm that wealth ranking was actually carried out.. 6, Vote Name = Gulu DLG. 6, Parish Name = Kal Umu. 6, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = No. 6, No. of villages = 5. 6, No. of villages where wealth ranking was carried out = 5. 6, Remarks = No evidence was availed to confirm that wealth ranking was actually
39
|
e2627aa6-813a-4f26-ab56-186174c08238
|
3 |
Appendix 4(d): Failure to carry out wealth ranking of households
Name = Amora. 6. Amuru DLG, Parish Name = No. 6. Amuru DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = . 6. Amuru DLG, No. of villages = 4. 6. Amuru DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = 0. 6. Amuru DLG, Remarks = Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level. 7. Amuru DLG, Vote Name = Odur. 7. Amuru DLG, Parish Name = No. 7. Amuru DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 3. 7. Amuru DLG, No. of villages = 0. 7. Amuru DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = . 7. Amuru DLG, Remarks = Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level. Amuru DLG, Vote Name = Otwee ward. Amuru DLG, Parish Name = No. Amuru DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 2. Amuru DLG, No. of villages = . Amuru DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level. Amuru DLG, Remarks = 8. 0. Amuru DLG, Vote Name = Pawel. Amuru DLG, Parish Name = No. Amuru DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 2. Amuru DLG, No. of villages = 0. Amuru DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level. Amuru DLG, Remarks = 9.. 10.
Amuru DLG, Vote Name = Lalem. 10. Amuru DLG, Parish Name = No. 10. Amuru DLG, Was wealth ranking carried out at parish level? = 2. 10. Amuru DLG, No. of villages = 0. 10. Amuru DLG, No. of villages were wealth ranking was carried out = . 10. Amuru DLG, Remarks = Wealth ranking was not carried out at parish level
|
260b3cf4-d005-414d-a2c5-766ffd8ef28e
|
3 |
Appendix 29: Parishes with flagship projects inconsistent with Kikuube Selected Priority Commodities
PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 7., Name of HLG = Kikuub e DLG. 7., Parish = Buhimba East. 7., Name of PDM SACCO = Buhimba East-Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 7., Inconsistent Flagship projects = Coffee, Poultry,
rearing Tomatoes Vegetables,. 7., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 8., Name of HLG = Kikuub e DLG. 8., Parish = Buhimba west. 8., Name of PDM SACCO = Buhimba West-Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 8., Inconsistent Flagship projects = Poultry, Piggery, Gnuts, Cereal growers, Coffee sellers. 8., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. 9., Name of HLG = Kikuub e DLG. 9., Parish = Kigaaya East. 9., Name of PDM SACCO = Kigaaya East-Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. 9., Inconsistent Flagship projects = G nuts, Soyabeans, Beans. 9., Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. , Name of HLG = 10. Kikuub e DLG. , Parish = Kigaaya West. , Name of PDM SACCO = Kigaaya West-Buhimba TC PDM SACCO. , Inconsistent Flagship projects = Poultry, G nuts, Goat rearing ,beans,. , Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000. , Name of HLG = . , Parish = . , Name of PDM SACCO = TOTAL. , Inconsistent Flagship projects = . , Expected PRF (UGX.) = 100,000,000
|
bffe1648-b4e3-4f8f-935e-76a34b4edcfd
|
4 |
Appendix 12: Registration of PDM SACCOs and Enterprise Groups
Tororo DLG. 138, Entity Name Os the ies Act No of.PDM SACC Os that were not regist ered under the Coope rative Societ ies = -. 138, Regis tratio n of PDM SACC Under Coope rative Societ.SACCOs that were not licensed to take on the business of lending under Microfinance Institutions money lenders act = -. 138, Licensing of PDM SACCOs Under the Microfinance Institutions Money Lenders Act No. of PDM.No. of Enterprise Groups that are not registered as Communit y Based Organizati ons = -. 138, Update of SACCO Enterprise and Household Registers No. of.PDM SACCOs that did not have a PDM member registers = 10. 138, Update of SACCO Enterprise and Household Registers No. of.No. PDM SACCOs that did not have updated PDM member registers = 10 -. 138, Signing of PRF Financing Agreements No. of PDM Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM SACCOs No. of PDM No. of PDM.SACCOs without signed PRF financin g agreem ents = -. 138, Signing of PRF Financing Agreements No. of PDM Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM SACCOs No. of PDM No. of PDM.SACCOs without signed PRF financing agreements that signed PPRF before the first AGM = -. 138, Signing of PRF Financing Agreements No. of PDM Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM SACCOs No. of PDM No. of PDM.SACCOs whose SACCO bank account number was not capture d in the signed PRF Financi ng Agreem = -. 138, Signing of PRF Financing Agreements No. of PDM Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM SACCOs No. of PDM No. of PDM.SACCOs that received funds before signing PRF financing agreemen ts = -. 138, Signing of PRF Financing Agreements No. of PDM
|
7ebf9bd3-26d0-41d9-9562-b96c073b333e
|
4 |
Appendix 12: Registration of PDM SACCOs and Enterprise Groups
PDM.Amount of PRF received before PRF agreements = -. 18, Signing of PRF Financing Agreements Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM SACCOs No. of PDM No. of PDM.Amount of PRF received before PRF agreements = -. 18, Signing of PRF Financing Agreements Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM SACCOs No. of PDM No. of PDM.Amount of PRF received before PRF agreements = -. 19, Vote code. = . 19, Entity Name. = Kitgum MC. 19, Regis tratio n of PDM SACC Os Under the Coope rative Societ ies Act No of PDM.SACC Os that were not regist ered under the Coope rative Societ ies Act. = 0. 19, Licensing of PDM SACCOs Under the Microfinance Institutions Money Lenders Act.No. of PDM SACCOs that were not licensed to take on the business of lending under Microfinance Institutions money lenders act = 10. 19, Registration of Enterprise Groups as Community Based Organizations.No. of Enterprise Groups that are not registered as Communit y Based Organizati ons = 0. 19, Registration of Enterprise Groups as Community Based Organizations.No. of SACCOs. = . 19, Update of SACCO Enterprise and Household Registers.No. of PDM SACCOs that did not have a PDM member registers = 0. 19, Update of SACCO Enterprise and Household Registers.No. PDM SACCOs that did not have updated PDM member registers = . 19, Signing of PRF Financing Agreements Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM SACCOs No. of PDM No. of PDM.No. of PDM SACCOs without signed PRF financin g agreem ents = . 19, Signing of PRF Financing Agreements Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM SACCOs No. of PDM No. of PDM.SACCOs without signed PRF financing agreements that
|
40de6b69-bbb0-41c7-91d9-03359914a4bc
|
4 |
5.5.11Registration of PDM SACCOs and Enterprise Groups
Paragraph 2.6.2, 2.6.3, 3.10 of Users' Handbook for the Parish Revolving Fund (PRF) under PDM Pillar 3 - Financial Inclusion October 2022; and Section 36(1, 2 &3) of Tier 4: Microfinance Institutions Money Lenders Act, 2016 requires that;
The LG and more specifically the TILED department shall support the Office of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies at the MoTIC, to complete the PDM SACCO registration process.
A SACCO shall not carry on the business of provision of financial services to its members unless it is a registered society and licensed under this Act or it is operating on a probationary period pending registration under the Cooperatives Societies Act or it has applied for a licence under this Act.
The PDM Enterprise Groups shall be registered by the Community Development Officers at the Sub-County, as a Community Based Organization. A copy of the certificate of Registration of the Enterprise Group (together with details of the members of the Group) shall be sent to the Chairperson of the PDM SACCO and to the DCO.
A SACCO shall sign PRF Financing Agreement with the Accounting Officer. The purpose of this Agreement is to formalise the relationship between Government and the PDM SACCOs.
The Chairperson PDM SACCO shall from time to time update the PDM Member Register and at any available General Meeting shall present the new members to the general assembly for admission into the PDM SACCO
The AO shall submit an Attestation Form to confirm that the PDM SACCO was formed in accordance with the issued PDM Pillar 3 guidelines. This was further emphasised by the PSST in the budget execution circular for FY 2022/2023 dated June 2022.
I made the following observations;
|
02ca4652-2412-4b91-b0e2-eeb0d8bd94c5
|
4 |
Appendix 12: Registration of PDM SACCOs and Enterprise Groups
SACCOs No. of PDM Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM No. of PDM No. of PDM Amount of PRF received before PRF.SACCOs whose SACCO bank account number was not capture d in the signed PRF Financi ng Agreem ent = 0. , Update of SACCO Enterprise and Household Registers Signing of PRF Financing Agreements No. PDM SACCOs No. of PDM Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM No. of PDM No. of PDM Amount of PRF received before PRF.SACCOs that received funds before signing PRF financing agreemen ts 0 = 0. , Update of SACCO Enterprise and Household Registers Signing of PRF Financing Agreements No. PDM SACCOs No. of PDM Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM No. of PDM No. of PDM Amount of PRF received before PRF.agreements 0 = 0. 69, Vote code. = 848 849. 69, Entity Name. = Kamuli DLG. 69, Regis tratio n of PDM SACC Os Under the Coope rative Societ.ies Act No of PDM SACC Os that were not regist ered under the Coope rative Societ ies Act. = -. 69, Licensing of PDM SACCOs Under the Microfinance Institutions Money Lenders Act No. of PDM SACCOs that.were not licensed to take on the business of lending under Microfinance Institutions money lenders act = . 69, Registration of Enterprise Groups as Community Based Organizations.No. of Enterprise Groups that are not registered as Communit y Based Organizati ons = 0. 69, No. of SACCOs. = 0. 69, No. of PDM SACCOs that did not have a PDM member registers = 0. 69, Update of SACCO Enterprise and Household Registers Signing of PRF Financing Agreements No. PDM SACCOs No. of PDM Amount of PRF transferred to PDM No. of PDM
|
147b4504-3b79-43e3-b2d7-5a2c04291722
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.