id
stringlengths 36
36
| text
stringlengths 1
400
| source
stringclasses 10
values |
|---|---|---|
d39cbc58-74b4-4ef1-94e9-fca6e10c50c2 | . Thus, the balance of hardships in this protest favors the issuance of injunctive relief. Finally, the public has a strong interest in ensuring government agencies structure procurements within the bounds of the law. See, e.g., Transatlantic Lines, LLC v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl | Sh_Synergy,_LLC_2023-04-28.txt |
136387b7-ffea-4063-9d99-72ec0a6a80e2 | . 48, 57 (2005) (“The public has a strong interest in [ensuring] that public officials treat contractors fairly and generally obey procurement laws and regulations.”) (citations omitted). For the foregoing reasons, this Court enjoins Defendant from evaluating proposals and awarding IDIQ contracts under the current versions of the Polaris SB, WOSB, and SDVOSB Pool Solicitations | Sh_Synergy,_LLC_2023-04-28.txt |
183ece8b-4f8d-4ab6-a134-067c1992d61f | . Throughout this Memorandum and Order, this Court has identified the aspects of these Solicitations that require revision by GSA to comply with the law, and similarly, this Court has highlighted various nonexclusive alternatives GSA may take to eliminate illegalities raised in this action | Sh_Synergy,_LLC_2023-04-28.txt |
871eec25-a0f0-4fc7-8f11-cacbf86ccdeb | . Should it wish to proceed with the procurement, GSA may do so provided it amends the SB, WOSB, and SDVOSB Pool Solicitations in compliance and consistent with this Court’s Memorandum and Order. CONCLUSION For the reasons described above, this Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs’ Motions for Judgment on the Administrative Record (ECF Nos | Sh_Synergy,_LLC_2023-04-28.txt |
3d692788-06d4-4f6b-aa20-93fe823ef36f | . 33, 34) and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (ECF No. 37). Defendant is ENJOINED from evaluating proposals and awarding IDIQ contracts under the current versions of the SB, WOSB, and SDVOSB Pool Solicitations | Sh_Synergy,_LLC_2023-04-28.txt |
73d166e9-6fad-4f78-8952-f0b48797b943 | . To proceed with this procurement, Defendant must amend the SB, WOSB, and SDVOSB Pool 75 Solicitations, and evaluate proposals under those Solicitations, consistent with and in compliance with this Court’s Memorandum and Order. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter Judgment accordingly | Sh_Synergy,_LLC_2023-04-28.txt |
ab2163b6-324d-4bfc-91fc-1f5ae56e5357 | . The parties are directed to CONFER and FILE a Notice within seven days, attaching a proposed public version of this Sealed Memorandum and Order, with any competition-sensitive or otherwise protected information redacted. IT IS SO ORDERED. Eleni M. Roumel ELENI M. ROUMEL Judge Dated: April 21, 2023 Washington, D.C. | Sh_Synergy,_LLC_2023-04-28.txt |