KRONOS 8B V4
The goal with this merge is to have a significant step towards why the older TIES merges nuke the IFEval score. Present hypothesis is that merging on the non-instruct model causes this disparity, as IFEval measures instruction-following capacity. It's also possible that either P1 or P3 causes the problem.
Merge Details
Merge Method
This model was merged using the Model Stock merge method using unsloth/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct as a base.
Models Merged
The following models were included in the merge:
Configuration
The following YAML configuration was used to produce this model:
base_model: unsloth/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
dtype: bfloat16
merge_method: model_stock
slices:
- sources:
- layer_range: [0, 32]
model: T145/KRONOS-8B-V1-P1
- layer_range: [0, 32]
model: T145/KRONOS-8B-V1-P2
- layer_range: [0, 32]
model: T145/KRONOS-8B-V1-P3
- layer_range: [0, 32]
model: mukaj/Llama-3.1-Hawkish-8B
- layer_range: [0, 32]
model: unsloth/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
tokenizer_source: base
Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results
Detailed results can be found here! Summarized results can be found here!
| Metric | % Value |
|---|---|
| Avg. | 28.60 |
| IFEval (0-Shot) | 78.89 |
| BBH (3-Shot) | 30.14 |
| MATH Lvl 5 (4-Shot) | 18.58 |
| GPQA (0-shot) | 5.26 |
| MuSR (0-shot) | 7.77 |
| MMLU-PRO (5-shot) | 30.95 |
- Downloads last month
- 14
This model does not have enough activity to be deployed to Inference API (serverless) yet. Increase its social
visibility and check back later, or deploy to Inference Endpoints (dedicated)
instead.
Model tree for T145/KRONOS-8B-V4
Merge model
this model
Evaluation results
- strict accuracy on IFEval (0-Shot)Open LLM Leaderboard78.890
- normalized accuracy on BBH (3-Shot)Open LLM Leaderboard30.140
- exact match on MATH Lvl 5 (4-Shot)Open LLM Leaderboard18.580
- acc_norm on GPQA (0-shot)Open LLM Leaderboard5.260
- acc_norm on MuSR (0-shot)Open LLM Leaderboard7.770
- accuracy on MMLU-PRO (5-shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard30.950