Taking what seemed to work out well with Crimson_Dawn-v0.1, the new Crimson_Dawn-v0.2 is the same training methodology, training on Mistral-Nemo-Base-2407 this time I've added significantly more data, as well as trained using RSLoRA as opposed to regular LoRA. Another key change is training on ChatML as opposed to Mistral Formatting.
Quants!
Prompting
The v0.2 models are trained on ChatML, the prompting structure goes a little something like this:
<|im_start|>user
Hi there!<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
Nice to meet you!<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>user
Can I ask a question?<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
Context and Instruct
The v0.2 models are trained on ChatML, please use that Context and Instruct template.
Current Top Sampler Settings
Spicy_Temp
Violet_Twilight-Nitral-Special
Training
Training was done twice over 2 epochs each on two 2x NVIDIA A6000 GPUs using LoRA. A two-phased approach was used in which the base model was trained 2 epochs on RP data, the LoRA was then applied to base. Finally, the new modified base was trained 2 epochs on instruct, and the new instruct LoRA was applied to the modified base, resulting in what you see here.
Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results
Detailed results can be found here
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Avg. | 14.82 |
IFEval (0-Shot) | 31.03 |
BBH (3-Shot) | 21.69 |
MATH Lvl 5 (4-Shot) | 2.72 |
GPQA (0-shot) | 3.47 |
MuSR (0-shot) | 10.90 |
MMLU-PRO (5-shot) | 19.10 |
- Downloads last month
- 38
Model tree for Epiculous/Crimson_Dawn-v0.2
Datasets used to train Epiculous/Crimson_Dawn-v0.2
Spaces using Epiculous/Crimson_Dawn-v0.2 2
Collection including Epiculous/Crimson_Dawn-v0.2
Evaluation results
- strict accuracy on IFEval (0-Shot)Open LLM Leaderboard31.030
- normalized accuracy on BBH (3-Shot)Open LLM Leaderboard21.690
- exact match on MATH Lvl 5 (4-Shot)Open LLM Leaderboard2.720
- acc_norm on GPQA (0-shot)Open LLM Leaderboard3.470
- acc_norm on MuSR (0-shot)Open LLM Leaderboard10.900
- accuracy on MMLU-PRO (5-shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard19.100