Yessir, driving at night and those led headlights turning off all ability to see till the cars passed me. All I can do is try to stay straight and hope for the best. Lol
I'm exaggerating a little bit sometimes that's how it feels.
Canz
Canzy
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
replied to
paulpham157's
post
2 days ago
This isn't really related, but... do people generally prefer dark themes or light themes?
replied to
paulpham157's
post
3 days ago
This isn't really related, but... do people generally prefer dark themes or light themes?
liked
a model
about 1 month ago
SicariusSicariiStuff/Phi-lthy4_GGUF
Organizations
replied to
paulpham157's
post
2 days ago
replied to
paulpham157's
post
3 days ago
Dark, preferably black backgrounds with a blueish text that makes it look like its lit up. I'm not young anymore and had to start wearing glasses. I find this makes lettering standout without hurting my eyes.
liked
a
model
about 1 month ago
reacted to
giadap's
post with 👍
3 months ago
Post
10985
One of the hardest challenges in AI safety is finding the right balance: how do we protect people from harm without undermining their agency? This tension is especially visible in conversational systems, where safeguards can sometimes feel more paternalistic than supportive.
In my latest piece for Hugging Face, I argue that open source and community-driven approaches offer a promising (though not exclusive) way forward.
✨ Transparency can make safety mechanisms into learning opportunities.
✨ Collaboration with diverse communities makes safeguards more relevant across contexts.
✨ Iteration in the open lets protections evolve rather than freeze into rigid, one-size-fits-all rules.
Of course, this isn’t a silver bullet. Top-down safety measures will still be necessary in some cases. But if we only rely on corporate control, we risk building systems that are safe at the expense of trust and autonomy.
Read the blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/preserving-agency
In my latest piece for Hugging Face, I argue that open source and community-driven approaches offer a promising (though not exclusive) way forward.
✨ Transparency can make safety mechanisms into learning opportunities.
✨ Collaboration with diverse communities makes safeguards more relevant across contexts.
✨ Iteration in the open lets protections evolve rather than freeze into rigid, one-size-fits-all rules.
Of course, this isn’t a silver bullet. Top-down safety measures will still be necessary in some cases. But if we only rely on corporate control, we risk building systems that are safe at the expense of trust and autonomy.
Read the blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/preserving-agency
- 7 replies
Well said. When I first started reading the initial post it kept going through my mind "your resonsible for protecting me? No thanks it's my responsibility to protect myself as it is everyone else." I come here to learn in all respects for my own personal interest and censoring what I am allowed to learn for "my best interest" just doesn't add up to me.
I was told when I was in my early 20s (mid 50s now) that if someone says something that pisses me off, I better go look in the mirror for why, and it's just true so I try to live by it.
reacted to
jasoncorkill's
post with 👍
11 months ago
Post
2864
Integrating human feedback is vital for evolving AI models. Boost quality, scalability, and cost-effectiveness with our crowdsourcing tool!
..Or run A/B tests and gather thousands of responses in minutes. Upload two images, ask a question, and watch the insights roll in!
Check it out here and let us know your feedback: https://app.rapidata.ai/compare
..Or run A/B tests and gather thousands of responses in minutes. Upload two images, ask a question, and watch the insights roll in!
Check it out here and let us know your feedback: https://app.rapidata.ai/compare