Special case Lustify-endgame
First of all, this Lora is not unsafe or special audience or nsfw at all. It does exactly what it says, why and how you use it is up to you. I can't seem to set just one discussion as unsafe. So i have to keep the language vague while discussing an observation about Lustify:
--
If you use lustify the way it is meant and trained (Men and woman in cooperative actions), just one general tip: put the lora weight a bit lower, maybe 0.8 or even less, to give it some wiggle room to mix things smoothly, so it doesnt just fade out things ( fabric) to allow other things to be seen but to make it work correctly and smoothly. The Lora is not itself in any way specially trained for that. And that's it for you, you can leave now :)
There is a accidental feature of the lora. if you wanna use lustify for all male based situations, explicit or not, a (any) all-male trained lora like this actual helps a bit, to reel it in. Lustify is generally better with anatomy (even limbs, body) in more complicated poses, than most sdxl models. so if you struggle with such a scene give lustify a shot. But it really, REALLY wants to crowbar woman into multi people scenes. Unlike Illustrious (fully NSFW capable btw),which respects a "all male scene" prompt, Lustify does NOT.
With a all male lora it is easier to stop it from doing it. Doesn't need to be this, If you have any male person lora, load it in, even at 0.2-0.5 or so, you'll have a easier time to keep it Lustify where you want it.
But no miracles, you gotta also be careful with phrasing: avoid actual established explicit terms for interactions, the model was trained with. Then it WILL win.
Another general trick that helps: assigning specific names like man1 and man2 (with two * at either side, this post formatting hijacks those) in the prompt and use them consequently in your prompt to track specific people, give it no chance to get creative. Prompt those people near each other in roughly the right kind of pose and the model will actually connect the dots without you telling it explicitly.
There are also one such poses (aft, seen from behind), where it simply has no concept of how it works without a woman.