jending12 commited on
Commit
d610eff
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 452eb3a

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +9 -10
README.md CHANGED
@@ -11,25 +11,24 @@ We are a community of researchers from different countries and institutions inte
11
 
12
 
13
  <details>
14
- <summary>[Complete] Quantitative Analysis of Hugging Face Hub </summary>
15
 
16
  - Using activity data from Hugging Face Hub datasets, models and spaces, we ran a three-part quantitative analysis of development activity, finding that:
17
  - activity is extremely imbalanced between repositories; with over 70% of models having 0 downloads, while 1% accounting for 99% of downloads
18
  - the community has a core-periphery structure, with a core of prolific developers while the large majority (89%) of developers are "islands", primarily working alone.
19
  </details>
20
 
21
-
22
  <details>
23
- <summary>[Ongoing] Cartography of Collaboration in the Open Source AI Ecosystem </summary>
24
-
25
- - We are investigating how open source AI artefacts such as open datasets and open-weight models are built and who contributes to this process across the model building pipeline, including during the pre-release and post-release phases.
26
- - Our research aims to map collaboration practices from pre-release to post-release across diverse organisational contexts, including individuals, grassroots initiatives, research institutes, startups, and large technology companies, and geographies.
27
 
 
 
28
  </details>
29
 
30
- <details>
31
- <summary>[Ongoing] Model Tree Lineages from Base Models to Derived Models </summary>
 
 
 
32
 
33
- - We are looking into what kinds of downstream activity are most prevalent for different kinds of base foundation models.
34
- - What kinds of derivations (e.g. fine tuning, quantizing) are most popular?
35
  </details>
 
11
 
12
 
13
  <details>
14
+ <summary><b>[Complete] Quantitative Analysis of Hugging Face Hub</b></summary>
15
 
16
  - Using activity data from Hugging Face Hub datasets, models and spaces, we ran a three-part quantitative analysis of development activity, finding that:
17
  - activity is extremely imbalanced between repositories; with over 70% of models having 0 downloads, while 1% accounting for 99% of downloads
18
  - the community has a core-periphery structure, with a core of prolific developers while the large majority (89%) of developers are "islands", primarily working alone.
19
  </details>
20
 
 
21
  <details>
22
+ <summary><b>[Ongoing] Model Tree Lineages from Base Models to Derived Models</b> </summary>
 
 
 
23
 
24
+ - We are looking into what kinds of downstream activity are most prevalent for different kinds of base foundation models.
25
+ - What kinds of derivations (e.g. fine tuning, quantizing) are most popular?
26
  </details>
27
 
28
+ <details open>
29
+ <summary><b>[Ongoing] Cartography of Collaboration in the Open Source AI Ecosystem</b> </summary>
30
+
31
+ - We are investigating how open source AI artefacts such as open datasets and open-weight models are built and who contributes to this process across the model building pipeline, including during the pre-release and post-release phases.
32
+ - Our research aims to map collaboration practices from pre-release to post-release across diverse organisational contexts, including individuals, grassroots initiatives, research institutes, startups, and large technology companies, and geographies.
33
 
 
 
34
  </details>