 to inaugurate apartments, roads, and bridges and to argue that it helps the infrastructure for development.
Nonetheless, community groups are digging in their heels to resist further demolitions such as those which have left Mirador Park, an area near the lighthouse, looking like a battleground.
``Every poor person in this city is faced with the threat of displacement,'' says Nicol'as Guevara of the Committee to Defend Neighborhood Rights (Copadeba). ``The project engineers promise them new homes,'' he says. But once their old homes are demolished, residents find that the promised new homes were given to someone else.
An official of the 500th anniversary committee, Jos'e Chez Checo, denies the charge. ``There have been problems with some projects, but near the lighthouse area the displaced persons have been moved back into the new residences,'' he says.
Extensions of major traffic arteries also are scheduled to plow through crowded barrios.
Some of the affected zones were, in fact, hotbeds of activism in 1984 when more than 100 people died in rioting over price increases of basic necessities.
Affected residents say the officials' main aim is to pressure people to leave.
``They asked me if I wanted money or a shack,'' relates Salvador Rinc'on, who refused a cash payment of $700 for his demolished house. He now lives with his family of five in a precarious hut next to an open sewer while awaiting a promised apartment.
``How could I take a couple of pesos and end up in the street?'' he asks.
In addition, critics say, the government is building too much, too fast.
The government scoffs at these criticisms of its plans, particularly for the lighthouse.
// Import our dependencies
import { Routes } from '@angular/router';
import { LoginComponent } from './login/login.component';
import { HomeComponent } from './home/home.component';
import { AuthGuard } from './auth/auth.guard';

// Define which component should be loaded based on the current URL
export const routes: Routes = [
  { path: 'home', component: HomeComponent, canActivate: [AuthGuard] },
  { path: '**', component: LoginComponent }
];
FURIOUS single mums have taken the Government to court over Universal Credit - saying they're being made poorer and forced to foodbanks.
Danielle Johnson, who worked part-time as a dinner lady, and three others are drowning in debt after going onto the new welfare system.
She said the flagship policy forces hardship as the amount she gets changes wildly every month - leaving her £500 a year worse off. Tens of THOUSANDS of Brits could be affected, lawyers argued today.
Danielle, 25, from West Yorkshire, said: "I have never been this financially unstable before, to the point of being unable to afford my rent and having to go into my overdraft when buying food.
"It is getting me into a vicious cycle of debt.
"Universal Credit is supposed to be simpler and fairer, but my experience of it is the opposite."
She said was working part time to try and make ends meet and look after her daughter, but the system meant she wasn't better off if she went back to work.
Claire Woods, Erin Barrett and Katie Stewart are also taking their cases to court - and some had fallen into debt or had to rely on food banks.
Claire said she had been forced to food banks, had to turn down a promotion and was pushed into debt.
"I am competent managing my own finances and am someone who wants to work for professional and personal development, but the assessment period problem meant my income fluctuated so much that it was impossible to budget," she said.
"I wanted to become free of welfare through my chosen profession but Universal Credit is holding me back from that."
Jenni Richards QC, representing the women, told the court: "The claimants in this case all have a number of things in common.
"They are all lone parents, they have all been doing their utmost to work and not depend solely on benefits."
"There is no reason to suspect they are anomalous or isolated cases," she added.
Tessa Gregory from Leigh Day who is representing Danielle, said the system was "broken and ill-thought out".
And Child Poverty Action Group's Carla Clarke, who is representing the other three mums, said the system was undercutting the purpose of helping people into work.
She said: "Our clients have been left repeatedly without money for family essentials simply because of the date of their paydays."
Their case is being heard at the High Court today, which is the second time Universal Credit has come under fire.
Over the summer a landmark case found that ministers had acted unlawfully and discriminated against two men with severe disabilities.
The DWP say: "You will need to be prepared for a month when you get 2 earnings payments in one assessment period and budget for a potential change in your monthly Universal Credit payments".
They also say: "Speak to your work coach if there is a gap in your Universal Credit payments and you need help to budget and manage your money more effectively"
The single mums are just one case of hundreds of Brits who have said that Universal Credit isn't working for them.
The Sun revealed how one single dad who gave up work to look after his baby son had got NOTHING for 2 months because of a glitch in how his payday was calculated.
The new system measures earnings in a one month period, but if an individual gets paid every fortnight or four weeks they can see their benefits slashed.
And yesterday one single mum said she could become homeless after losing a bid for Universal Credit help.
Anyone else missing the video group chat testimony meeting with the rest of their family?

I wish my family could get together for reasons other than church. The lady and I know that we are excluding ourselves, but it’d be so hard to sit and listen to my family say emotional but sincere thoughts and feelings wrapped around a few odd falsehoods and riddled with regurgitated lds word choice. I’d have to hold my tongue. The family thinks we don’t want anything to do with them, but it’s not true, we just can’t be a part of that foolishness. I guess that’s what they’re led to believe though, that if your relative “strays from the path” it means that they don’t love you enough to spend the afterlife with them.Contents
- Introduction
- Step 1. Identify the purpose of your architecture
- Step 2. Identify your business questions
- Step 3. Identify assumptions and business rules
- Step 4. Identify your framework
- Step 5. Create a metamodel
- Step 6. Identify the models needed in the architecture
- Step 7. Integrate the architecture
- Downloadable resources
- Related topics
A practical guide to developing enterprise architecture
Enterprise architecture is a logical organization of a business and its supporting data, applications, and IT infrastructure, with clearly defined goals and objectives for the future success of the business. A typical architecture consists of diagrams, or models, that show how aspects of your business relate. For example an organizational chart is a model of how business units relate to each other.
Businesses should have an "as-is" architecture that represents its current state, and a planned architecture to show the direction of the business over the next one to five years.
Enterprise architecture aligns the following key areas. Note the examples in each area:
- Business: Processes, strategies, organization charts, and functions
- Information: Conceptual, logical and physical data models to show what information is needed and how it relates to other information For example, a customer and an order
- Application: Portfolios, interfaces, and services
- Infrastructure: Network concept diagrams, technology reference models
To achieve alignment, you model each key area from its own perspective, and then link the models from each perspective. For example, model business processes from a business perspective. Do not include things like applications. Then, link the business processes to the applications that support them, which helps you achieve alignment. We do this to ensure that every decision is based on a business need; therefore, an application is not dictating the way a business process is designed.
Throughout this article, we assume that you have a modeling tool to create your architecture. The implementation specific information in this article is based on Rational System Architect.
"We are doing architecture... to do architecture!"
Figure 1. If you do not have a purpose, your project will fail
The simplest way to ensure that your architecture fails is to not have a purpose for doing it. I've worked on architecture projects with hundreds of clients. When projects are not successful, I ask why they are creating an enterprise architecture. They respond, "Because we want an architecture!"
Step 1. Identify the purpose of your architecture
You can define the purpose of your architecture by asking the following questions:
- What information is important for the architecture?
- How much detail is needed to support analysis and decision making?
- Who will produce or use the architecture?
- What is the expected ROI of the architecture?
- What are the maintenance considerations?
If you cannot answer these questions, your architecture project will likely fail. Without a purpose you can waste months drawing business process diagrams that no one cares about. Or you may draw complex diagrams of application interfaces that cannot be presented to senior management because it will make their heads explode.
By knowing the purpose of the architecture, you can scope the necessary models and