 can be locked for added stability
- Its foldable tiller makes this product easy to store and transport.
- The knee walker’s 20 cm/8 in castors can be used in both indoor and outdoor settings.
- Low-maintenance and strong build quality (quality brand)The City of Miami Gardens was incorporated on May 13, 2003, as the 33rd city in Miami-Dade County. At a population of 105,457, it is the third largest city in Miami-Dade County (after Miami and Hialeah). The City is located in North-Central region of the county, mid-way between Fort Lauderdale and Miami, and is easily accessed by I-95, the Palmetto Expressway (SR 826) and the Florida Turnpike. The city comprises approximately 20 square miles.
Miami Gardens is home to Dolphin Stadium (used by the Miami Dolphins and the Florida Marlins) and Calder Race Track. It has vibrant commercial corridors along the Palmetto Expressway (serving as the central shopping district for the furniture trade) and along U.S. 441 (serving the automobile trade). The city has rail access through the Florida East Coast Railway and the South Florida Tri-Rail System. Only thing that I find that is different is the abundance of wildlife encounters as well as the amount of forest you can find. Where I live (Fairbanks) I live out of town just a bit and in my back yard I have had Lynx, Coyotes, many many moose, and tons of smaller game in my yard this past winter alone. I have to haul my own water since I am not connected to the city utilities, but I have high speed internet, cell service and regular shit. 

I have family that lives in the states, Michigan, Florida, Oregon, but I would never leave this state unless I had to. I hunt and fish almost year round and I wouldn't want to trade that for anything. As for life comparisons to larger cities, we have crime and murder and drug use just like anywhere else. Alaska is special but not that special for every day life, just gets cold in the winter with lots of sun in the summer and a lot of darkness in the winter.Netsuite: How to get a rowcount as a value instead of the saved search result?
Hello Ross, You can use the 'Count' summary type on the internal ID field after adding it as a column in the saved search.
Hi Harish, You can simply map'statusCode' in the response mapping for the import step to pass the response code to the next step. You don't need to set the success path since the response code is...
Hi Hristina, You will need to account for the namespaces. Resource path -/*[local-name()='OrderDto'] Success path -/*[local-name()='OrderDto']/*[name()='diffgr:diffgram']/*[local-name()='OrderDto']...TV Evangelists, it's an easy target, but what a target. We're not too familiar with them in this country, but in America? No matter where you turn the dial on the television Sunday, there they are, every station, wall to all TV Evangelists. And the idea is that they come on television and preach, they ask you to give them money, and the more money you give them, the more chance that your prayer will be answered. Must be genuine, must be the real thing. You know, there are the real guys but there are also some strange characters.
This user contribution was reformatted and added to the record of Phil Collins's views on 16 Jun 2022.Sonja Vesterholt, author and awarded documentary film instructor, producer, radio host, speaker and much more. She came to Denmark from the USSR in 1970.
Sonja Vesterholt is cand.mag (Danish academic degree) in Russian language and literature and has for many years taught Russian at Copenhagen University and been interpreter for Danish Refugee Council. Sonja Vesterholt has also an education as creative producer from the The National Film School of Denmark. She has instructed and produced a number of documentaries and tv-programs, out of which several has won awards. Sonja is a member of the jury in several international film festivals.
Sonja Vesterholt published in 2011 her memoir “ HUNDEN ER RASK ” – about her childhood and youth in the USSR. The book is written in cooperation with the freelance author Britta Sörensen. The cooperation continued with the book “KJÆRLIGHETSLANDET” published in 2016. In this book Sonja Vesterhold is writing about her years in Denmark.
During the second quarter of 2018, Peabody Energy reported a 4% increase in revenues to $1.31 billion driven by a 20% increase in Australian met and thermal coal sales. “Peabody’s diversified portfolio continues to generate substantial returns, led by 39% margins from the company’s Australian platform, as we capitalize on continued strength in seaborne metallurgical and thermal coal fundamentals,” said Peabody President and CEO Glenn Kellow.
FILED: August 1, 2007
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
MEC LEASING, LLC,
a limited liability company,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DAVID JARRETT,
dba Mountain View Golf Club,
Defendant-Respondent.
Clackamas County Circuit Court
LV05050303; A131753
Steven L. Maurer, Judge.
Argued and submitted March 1, 2007.
Bradford H. Lamb argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Zarosinski & Hill LLP.
Angela M. Stewart argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Law Offices Robert S. Dorband Managing Attorney.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Carson, Senior Judge.
EDMONDS, P. J.
Reversed and remanded.
EDMONDS, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from the grant of summary judgment to defendant regarding plaintiff's claims of negligence, in which it alleged damage to four vehicles struck by golf balls hit from defendant's golf course. The vehicles were parked on property immediately adjacent to the golf course. (1) Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant because genuine issues of material fact exist that should be resolved by a jury. ORCP 47 C. We reverse and remand.
Defendant manages a golf course in Clackamas County. Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant, alleging that four vehicles parked on property next to the course had been damaged by four golf balls from the course. The complaint alleged that defendant was aware that an
"ultra hazardous and abnormally dangerous condition existed on the 15th tee and fairway * * * that was caused by players hitting errant golf balls from said 15th tee and fairway that traveled outside the limits of the Golf Course onto the adjacent Trust Property thereby threatening bodily injury to persons and damage to property thereon."
Plaintiff also alleged that defendant
"has a duty to maintain the Golf Course under all attendant circumstances in a reasonably safe condition and to take reasonable precautions to protect persons and property on adjacent property from injury or damage, when Defendant knew or should have known that golf balls driven by patron players from the 15th tee and fairway of his Golf Course frequently travel outside the limits of the Golf Course premises onto the adjacent Trust Property, thereby threatening persons and property thereon to bodily harm and damage."
Plaintiff also alleged that, although defendant was notified in July 2004 of the condition of the 15th tee and fairway, defendant "failed to take responsibility for or any action to abate or alleviate the said ultra hazardous and abnormally dangerous condition" and that defendant was negligent because
"(a) Defendant failed to supervise and control players using said 15th tee and fairway so as to preclude such players from hitting errant golf balls outside the limits of the Golf Course onto the Trust Property and cause damage to property thereon.
"(b) Defendant failed to warn persons on the adjacent Trust Property of the inherent danger of errant golf balls being driven by players on the 15th tee and fairway of the Golf Course outside the limits of the Golf Course onto the adjacent Trust Property threatening injury to persons and damage to property on the Trust Property.
"(c) Defendant permitted players on the 15th tee and fairway of his Golf Course to hit golf balls outside the limits of the Golf Course onto the adjacent Trust Property and cause damage to property located thereon.
"(d) Defendant failed to erect or install any protective fencing or other devices to preclude divergent golf balls from leaving the limits of the Golf Course and travel onto the adjacent Trust Property and cause damage to property thereon."
Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that he was not the proper defendant (2) and that plaintiff had failed to state ultimate facts sufficient to support a claim for relief. Defendant submitted an affidavit averring that the golf course had been in operation since 1964 and that "[t]here have been no material changes to the layout of the 15th hole of the golf course since the Trust purchased [its] property" and that "[t]here is no way to travel by land to [trust] property without passing by the golf course." Defendant also submitted an affidavit from one of his attorneys, which included copies of the deed for the trust property dated March 24, 2004, the trust's application for a permit to build a single family home on the trust property, and records related to the ownership of the golf course. In his motion for summary judgment, defendant argued that
"[p]laintiff is not a neighbor, nor an invitee, licensees [