Papers
arxiv:2507.09074

Favicon Trojans: Executable Steganography Via Ico Alpha Channel Exploitation

Published on Jul 11
· Submitted by dnoever on Jul 15
Authors:
,

Abstract

This paper presents a novel method of executable steganography using the alpha transparency layer of ICO image files to embed and deliver self-decompressing JavaScript payloads within web browsers. By targeting the least significant bit (LSB) of non-transparent alpha layer image values, the proposed method successfully conceals compressed JavaScript code inside a favicon image without affecting visual fidelity. Global web traffic loads 294 billion favicons daily and consume 0.9 petabytes of network bandwidth. A proof-of-concept implementation demonstrates that a 64x64 ICO image can embed up to 512 bytes uncompressed, or 0.8 kilobyte when using lightweight two-fold compression. On page load, a browser fetches the favicon as part of standard behavior, allowing an embedded loader script to extract and execute the payload entirely in memory using native JavaScript APIs and canvas pixel access. This creates a two-stage covert channel requiring no additional network or user requests. Testing across multiple browsers in both desktop and mobile environments confirms successful and silent execution of the embedded script. We evaluate the threat model, relate it to polymorphic phishing attacks that evade favicon-based detection, and analyze evasion of content security policies and antivirus scanners. We map nine example MITRE ATT&CK Framework objectives to single line JavaScript to execute arbitrarily in ICO files. Existing steganalysis and sanitization defenses are discussed, highlighting limitations in detecting or neutralizing alpha-channel exploits. The results demonstrate a stealthy and reusable attack surface that blurs traditional boundaries between static images and executable content. Because modern browsers report silent errors when developers specifically fail to load ICO files, this attack surface offers an interesting example of required web behaviors that in turn compromise security.

Community

Paper submitter

Steganography in transparent layer of ubiquitous web favicon ICO format

It's important to clarify the distinction between code obfuscation (including techniques like steganography) and actual security vulnerabilities.

While it's technically possible to conceal JavaScript code within images using methods like steganography, or to obfuscate it in other ways, this in itself does not compromise browser security. The core security mechanisms of modern web browsers are designed to handle code execution in a robust manner, regardless of how visible or "hidden" the code might appear.
Browser security relies primarily on sandboxing.

This means that even if malicious JavaScript were to execute, it would do so within a highly restricted environment, preventing it from directly accessing your system or sensitive data. The browser's Same-Origin Policy further limits how scripts from one origin can interact with resources from another, providing an additional layer of protection.

Therefore, the ability to obfuscate or conceal code, while potentially making analysis more difficult, does not equate to a bypass of fundamental security measures. Browser security policies are designed to mitigate risks at the point of execution within the sandbox, rather than relying on pre-execution scanning for obfuscated code.

·

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2507.09074 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2507.09074 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2507.09074 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.