nightmedia commited on
Commit
6b11d61
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 5768e03

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +29 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -16,44 +16,73 @@ Based on the benchmark results, qx4 would be best suited for:
16
  Primary Task: BoolQ (Boolean Questions)
17
 
18
  Why BoolQ is the Strength:
 
19
  qx4 achieves 0.877 on BoolQ, which is the second-highest score in this dataset
 
20
  Only slightly behind q5 (0.883) and qx5 (0.880)
 
21
  This represents excellent performance on boolean reasoning tasks
22
 
 
23
  Secondary Strengths:
 
24
  HellaSwag
 
25
  qx4 scores 0.552, which is the highest among all quantized models
 
26
  This indicates superior performance on commonsense reasoning and scenario understanding
27
 
28
  Arc_Challenge
 
29
  qx4 scores 0.419, which is better than most other quantized models
 
30
  Shows strong performance on challenging multiple-choice questions
31
 
 
32
  Task Suitability Analysis:
33
 
34
  Best Suited Tasks:
 
35
  BoolQ - Strongest performer
 
36
  HellaSwag - Highest among quantized models
 
37
  Arc_Challenge - Better than most quantizations
 
38
  Winogrande - Decent performance (0.567)
 
 
39
  Other Tasks Where qx4 Performs Well:
 
40
  Arc_Easy - 0.531 (solid performance)
 
41
  OpenBookQA - 0.426 (adequate for knowledge-based tasks)
 
42
  PIQA - 0.723 (good performance)
43
 
 
44
  Limitations:
 
45
  Weakest in OpenBookQA compared to qm68 (0.426 vs 0.430)
 
46
  Below average on Winogrande (0.567)
 
47
  Slightly lower than baseline on Arc_Easy
48
 
 
49
  Recommendation:
 
50
  Use qx4 when Boolean reasoning and commonsense understanding are critical, particularly for applications involving:
51
 
52
  Question answering requiring boolean logic
 
53
  Commonsense reasoning scenarios
 
54
  Complex multiple-choice question solving
 
55
  Tasks where HellaSwag performance is important
56
 
 
57
  The model excels at combining logical reasoning (BoolQ) with contextual understanding (HellaSwag), making it ideal for applications that blend precise logical inference with real-world commonsense knowledge. Its performance is particularly strong in scenarios requiring nuanced reasoning about everyday situations and causal relationships.
58
 
59
  Best for: AI assistants, question-answering systems requiring both logical precision and common-sense understanding.
 
16
  Primary Task: BoolQ (Boolean Questions)
17
 
18
  Why BoolQ is the Strength:
19
+
20
  qx4 achieves 0.877 on BoolQ, which is the second-highest score in this dataset
21
+
22
  Only slightly behind q5 (0.883) and qx5 (0.880)
23
+
24
  This represents excellent performance on boolean reasoning tasks
25
 
26
+
27
  Secondary Strengths:
28
+
29
  HellaSwag
30
+
31
  qx4 scores 0.552, which is the highest among all quantized models
32
+
33
  This indicates superior performance on commonsense reasoning and scenario understanding
34
 
35
  Arc_Challenge
36
+
37
  qx4 scores 0.419, which is better than most other quantized models
38
+
39
  Shows strong performance on challenging multiple-choice questions
40
 
41
+
42
  Task Suitability Analysis:
43
 
44
  Best Suited Tasks:
45
+
46
  BoolQ - Strongest performer
47
+
48
  HellaSwag - Highest among quantized models
49
+
50
  Arc_Challenge - Better than most quantizations
51
+
52
  Winogrande - Decent performance (0.567)
53
+
54
+
55
  Other Tasks Where qx4 Performs Well:
56
+
57
  Arc_Easy - 0.531 (solid performance)
58
+
59
  OpenBookQA - 0.426 (adequate for knowledge-based tasks)
60
+
61
  PIQA - 0.723 (good performance)
62
 
63
+
64
  Limitations:
65
+
66
  Weakest in OpenBookQA compared to qm68 (0.426 vs 0.430)
67
+
68
  Below average on Winogrande (0.567)
69
+
70
  Slightly lower than baseline on Arc_Easy
71
 
72
+
73
  Recommendation:
74
+
75
  Use qx4 when Boolean reasoning and commonsense understanding are critical, particularly for applications involving:
76
 
77
  Question answering requiring boolean logic
78
+
79
  Commonsense reasoning scenarios
80
+
81
  Complex multiple-choice question solving
82
+
83
  Tasks where HellaSwag performance is important
84
 
85
+
86
  The model excels at combining logical reasoning (BoolQ) with contextual understanding (HellaSwag), making it ideal for applications that blend precise logical inference with real-world commonsense knowledge. Its performance is particularly strong in scenarios requiring nuanced reasoning about everyday situations and causal relationships.
87
 
88
  Best for: AI assistants, question-answering systems requiring both logical precision and common-sense understanding.