`few-steps-rl` is the right direction

#65
by notafraud - opened

Just tested the new few-steps-rl version, and it works much better than original Chroma. It's still not quite there (wide aspect ratios cause multiple frames, realistic images are a bit too glossy/burned), but it's already an improvement. Thank you!

Is there a recommended step count for it? I tested 15, 20 and 30 steps, 30 seems to be the most stable, but maybe it's too much.

Does it require low CFG?

notafraud changed discussion status to closed
notafraud changed discussion status to open

Sorry, misclicked. Since cfg was not mentioned in the name, I haven't tested - should I? Does fewer steps imply lower useful cfg?

If it's distilled, it might need low CFG.

i get worse results. main version is still better.

I just tried it. It works with 8 steps and CFG 2.

Actually, 10 steps might be better.

it's a low CFG low steps model
with some "RL" target which actually closer to contrastive loss
so have fun generating stuff at 10-12 steps at cfg range 1-3

AKA a distill ... which is nice to have but not at the cost of main model quality... i rarely do under 96 cuz i do high level prompteneering and cfg magic.

he-man1 (13).png

Sign up or log in to comment