Switch to: References
Citations of:
Self-Energy and Action Principle in Relativistic Schrödinger Theory
P. Schust, F. Stary, M. Mattes & M. Sorg
Foundations of Physics 35 (6):1043-1105 (2005)
Add citations
You must login to add citations.
Order: Most recent First author
Export: Choose a format.. Formatted textPlain textBibTeXZoteroEndNoteReference Manager
Two- and Three-Particle Systems in Relativistic Schrödinger Theory.T. Beck & M. Sorg - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (7):1093-1147.details
The relativistic Schrödinger theory (RST) for N-fermion systems is further elaborated with respect to three fundamental problems which must emerge in any relativistic theory of quantum matter: (i) emergence/suppression of exchange forces between identical/non-identical particles, (ii) self-interactions, (iii) non-relativistic approximation. These questions are studied in detail for two- and three-particle systems but the results do apply to a general N-particle system. As a concrete demonstration, the singlet and triplet configurations of the positronium groundstate are considered within the RST framework, including (...) a discussion of the corresponding hyperfine splitting. (shrink)
Space and Time in Philosophy of Physical Science
Ortho- and Para-Helium in Relativistic Schrödinger Theory.F. Stary & M. Sorg - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (9):1325-1403.details
The characteristic features of ortho- and para-helium are investigated within the framework of Relativistic Schrödinger Theory (RST). The emphasis lies on the conceptual level, where the geometric and physical properties of both RST field configurations are inspected in detail. From the geometric point of view, the striking feature consists in the splitting of the $\mathfrak{u}(2)$ -valued bundle connection $\mathcal{A}_{\mu}$ into an abelian electromagnetic part (organizing the electromagnetic interactions between the two electrons) and an exchange part, which is responsible for their (...) exchange interactions. The electromagnetic interactions are mediated by the usual four-potentials A μ and thus are essentially the same for both types of field configurations, where naturally the electrostatic forces (described by the time component A 0 of A μ) dominate their magnetostatic counterparts (described by the space part A of A μ). Quite analogously to this, the exchange forces are as well described in terms of a certain vector potential (B μ), again along the gauge principles of minimal coupling, so that also the exchange forces split up into an "electric" type ( $\rightsquigarrow B_{0}$ ) and a "magnetic" type ( $\rightsquigarrow {\bf B}$ ). The physical difference of ortho- and para-helium is now that the first (ortho-) type is governed mainly by the "electric" kind of exchange forces and therefore is subject to a stronger influence of the exchange phenomenon; whereas the second (para-) type has vanishing "electric" exchange potential (B 0 ≡ 0) and therefore realizes exclusively the "magnetic" kind of interactions ( $\rightsquigarrow {\bf B}$ ), which, however, in general are smaller than their "electric" counterparts. The corresponding ortho/para splitting of the helium energy levels is inspected merely in the lowest order of approximation, where it coincides with the Hartree–Fock (HF) approximation. Thus RST may be conceived as a relativistic generalization of the HF approach where the fluid-dynamic character of RST implies many similarities with the density functional theory. (shrink)
Quantum Electrodynamics in Philosophy of Physical Science