Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
October 2015 , Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 899–911 | Cite as
Bubbly flow and gas–liquid mass transfer in square and circular microchannels for stress-free and rigid interfaces: dissolution model
David Mikaelian
Benoît Haut
Benoit Scheid
A model is proposed to describe the dissolution of a chain of spherical pure gas bubbles into a nonvolatile liquid, along square and circular microchannels. The gas–liquid interface is considered stress-free or rigid. This model enables predicting, in each considered case, the evolution along the microchannel of the bubble diameter, the bubble velocity, the separation distance between two successive bubbles, the liquid fraction, the pressure in both the liquid and the gas phases, the concentration of the dissolved gas in the liquid phase and the mass transfer coefficient between the bubble and the liquid phase. The influence on the gas dissolution of the interfacial boundary condition, the microchannel type, the operating conditions and the physicochemical properties of the liquid and gas is analyzed. Existing experimental data for a nearly square microchannel are convincingly reproduced using the model. The validity and the different applications of the model are also discussed.
Microfluidics Absorption Square microchannel Circular microchannel Bubbly flow Spherical bubbles
The authors thank Sam Dehaeck for the useful comment about the possible volatility of the liquid. D.M. and B.S. acknowledge the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.-F.N.R.S.) for their financial contribution. This research has been performed under the umbrella of the COST action MP1106 and also takes part in the Inter-university Attraction Pole Programme (IAP 7/38 MicroMAST) initiated by the Belgian Science Policy Office.
Appendix: Supplementary materials for the model construction
Separation distance between two successive bubbles along the microchannel
For \(\Delta x \rightarrow 0\), it can be considered that a bubble moves from x to \(x+\Delta x\) at a velocity \(V_B(x)\). The time for this bubble to travel the distance \(\Delta x\) is equal to \(\Delta x/V_B(x)\). During this time, the preceding bubble moves on a distance \(\Delta x - \ell (x+\Delta x)+\ell (x)\) at a velocity \(V_B(x- \ell (x))\):
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\Delta x}{V_B(x)}=\frac{\Delta x- \ell (x+\Delta x)+\ell (x)}{V_B(x- \ell (x))}, \end{aligned}$$
or, after rearrangement,
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\ell (x+\Delta x)-\ell (x)}{\Delta x}=\frac{V_B(x)-V_B(x- \ell (x))}{V_B(x)}. \end{aligned}$$
For \(\Delta x \rightarrow 0\), Eq. 18 leads to:
$$\begin{aligned} \ell '(x)=\frac{V_B(x)-V_B(x-\ell (x))}{V_B(x)}, \end{aligned}$$
where the prime denotes the derivative with respect to x. As \(\ell (x)\ll x\), except of course in the vicinity of the inlet, \(V_B(x)-V_B(x-\ell (x))\) is approximated by the first order of its Taylor expansion, i.e., \(V_B'(x) \ell (x)\). Equation 19 then simplifies into Eq. 11.
Concentration of the dissolved gas in the liquid phase along the microchannel
For a control segment of the microchannel of length \(\Delta x\) (see Fig. 6), the following mass balance can be written for the transferred species between the gas phase and the liquid phase, using the ideal gas law:
$$\begin{aligned} Q_L C(x)+ Q_G(x)\frac{p_G(x)}{R T}=Q_L C(x+\Delta x) + Q_G(x+\Delta x)\frac{p_G(x+\Delta x)}{R T}. \end{aligned}$$
Control segment of the microchannel of length \(\Delta x\)
Q L is taken independent of x thanks to the fact that the gas density is much lower than the liquid density, such that the amount of gas dissolved in the liquid does not significantly affect its flow rate.
Using Eq. 9, Eq. 20 can be rearranged as
$$\begin{aligned} C(x)+\frac{1-\alpha _L(x)}{\alpha _L(x)}\frac{p_G(x)}{R T}=C(x+\Delta x)+\frac{1-\alpha _L(x+\Delta x)}{\alpha _L(x+\Delta x)}\frac{p_G(x+\Delta x)}{R T}. \end{aligned}$$
For \(\Delta x \rightarrow 0\), Eq. 21 becomes
$$\begin{aligned} C'(x)=-\frac{1}{RT} \left( \frac{1-\alpha _L(x)}{\alpha _L(x)} p_G(x) \right) ', \end{aligned}$$
or equivalently recasts into Eq. 15.
Bubble diameter along the microchannel
If a bubble is at the coordinate x at time t and at the coordinate \(x+\Delta x\) at time \(t+\Delta t\) and if \(\Delta t \rightarrow 0\) is considered, \(\Delta t\) can be replaced by \(\Delta x/V_B(x)\) and the following mass balance can be written for the transferred species between the gas phase and the liquid phase, using the ideal gas law:
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{p_G(x+\Delta x)}{R T}\frac{\pi d^3(x+\Delta x)}{6}-\frac{p_G(x)}{R T}\frac{\pi d^3(x)}{6} = -\frac{\Delta x}{V_B(x)} \pi d(x)^2 k_l(x) [C_{\rm sat}(x)-C(x)], \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{6RT}\left( p_G(x)\,d^3(x)\right) ' = -\frac{d^2(x)k_l(x)}{V_B(x)} [ C_{\rm sat}(x) - C(x)] , \end{aligned}$$
Abolhasani M, Gunther A, Kumacheva E (2014) Microfluidic studies of carbon dioxide. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:2–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruus H (2008) Theoretical microfluidics, vol 18. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 41–50, 75Google Scholar
Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME (1978) Bubbles, drops and particles. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Cubaud T, Ho CM (2004) Transport of bubbles in square microchannels. Phys Fluids 16:4575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubaud T, Sauzade M, Sun R (2012) \({\text{CO}}_2\) dissolution in water using long serpentine microchannels. Biomicrofluidics 6:022002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman WL, Morton RK (1953) An experimental investigation of the drag and shape of air bubbles rising in various liquids. David Taylor Model Basin, Report 802Google Scholar
Kashid MN, Renken A, Kiwi-Minsker L (2011) Gas–liquid and liquid–liquid mass transfer in microstructured reactors. Chem Eng Sci 66(17):3876–3897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim N, Evans ET, Park DS, Soper SA, Murphy MC, Nikitopoulos DE (2011) Gas–liquid two-phase flows in rectangular polymer micro-channels. Exp Fluids 51(2):373–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner W (2002) Supercritical carbon dioxide as a green reaction medium for catalysis. Acc Chem Res 35:746–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikaelian D, Haut B, Scheid B (2015) Bubbly flow and gas–liquid mass transfer in square and circular microchannels for stress-free and rigid interfaces. CFD analysis. Microfluid Nanofluid. doi: 10.1007/s10404-015-1578-0
Park JI, Nie Z, Kumachev A, Abdelrahman AI, Binks BP, Stone HA, Kumacheva E (2009) A microfluidic approach to chemically driven assembly of colloidal particles at gas–liquid interfaces. Angew Chem Int Ed 48:5300–5304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shim S, Wan J, Hilgenfeldt S, Panchal PD, Stone HA (2014) Dissolution without disappearing: multicomponent gas exchange for \({\text{CO}}_2\) bubbles in a microfluidic channel. Lab Chip 14(14):2428–2436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song H, Chen DL, Ismagilov RF (2006) Reactions in droplets in microfluidic channels. Angew Chem Int Ed 45(44):7336–7356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan CA, Guglielmini L, Ellerbee AK, Caviezel D, Stone HA, Whitesides GM (2011) Sheathless hydrodynamic positioning of buoyant drops and bubbles inside microchannels. Phys Rev E 84:036302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun R, Cubaud T (2011) Dissolution of carbon dioxide bubbles and microfluidic multiphase flows. Lab Chip 11:2924–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terwagne D, Brojan M, Reis PM (2014) Smart morphable surfaces for aerodynamic drag control. Adv Mater 26:6608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele J, Abate AR, Shum HC, Bachtler S, Frster S, Weitz DA (2010) Fabrication of polymersomes using double-emulsion templates in glass-coated stamped microfluidic devices. Small 6:1723–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trana V-T, Benot J-P, Venier-Julienne M-C (2011) Why and how to prepare biodegradable, monodispersed, polymeric microparticles in the field of pharmacy? Int J Pharm 407:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triplett KA, Ghiaasiaan SM, Abdel-Khalik SI, Sadowski DL (1999a) Gas–liquid two-phase flow in microchannels, Part I: two-phase flow patterns. Int J Multiph Flow 25(3):377–394zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triplett KA, Ghiaasiaan SM, Abdel-Khalik SI, LeMouel A, McCord BN (1999b) Gas–liquid two-phase flow in microchannels, Part II: void fraction and pressure drop. Int J Multiph Flow 25(3):395–410zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voicu D, Abolhasani M, Choueiri R, Lestari G, Seiler C, Menard G, Greener J, Guenther A, Stephan DW, Kumacheva E (2014) Microfluidic studies of \({\text{CO}}_2\) sequestration by frustrated Lewis pairs. J Am Chem Soc 136:3875–3880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yue J, Chen G, Yuan Q, Luo L, Gonthier Y (2007) Hydrodynamics and mass transfer characteristics in gas–liquid flow through a rectangular microchannel. Chem Eng Sci 62(7):2096–2108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziemecka I, van Steijn V, Koper GJM, Kreutzer MT, van Esch JH (2011a) All-aqueous core–shell droplets produced in a microfluidic device. Soft Matter 7:9878–9880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziemecka I, van Steijn V, Koper GJM, Rosso M, Brizard AM, van Esch JH, Kreutzer MT (2011b) Monodisperse hydrogel microspheres by forced droplet formation in aqueous two-phase systems. Lab Chip 11:620–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1.Transfers, Interfaces and Processes (TIPs), CP 165/67Université libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
Mikaelian, D., Haut, B. & Scheid, B. Microfluid Nanofluid (2015) 19: 899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-015-1619-8
Accepted 20 July 2015
Publisher Name Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Immediate access to your online only subscription
Includes issues from January to December 2019
Automatic annual renewal