157-10002-10165).._

+i : . " Date:10/05/93
af ‘ Page:1
i JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM

IDENTIFICATION FORM

AGENCY INFORMATION

AGENCY : SSCIA
RECORD NUMBER : 157-10002-10165

RECORDS SERIES :
TRANSCRIPT

AGENCY FILE. NUMBER R-696

ORIGINATOR : SSCIA
FROM :
TO:

TITLE : |
TESTIMONY OF DAVID ATLEE PHILLIPS |

DATE : 07/31/75
PAGES : 178

SUBJECTS ;

ao git Lait

CIA

CUBA

CASTRO

LANSKY, MEYER

BAY OF PIGS
ASSASSINATION
TRAFFICANTE, SANTOS
RUBY, JACK

CHILE

ALLENDE
OPERATION MONGOOSE

DOCUMENT TYPE : FAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT

CLASSIFICATION : en
RESTRICTIONS: : ner

CURRENT STATUS. :

DATE OF LAST REVE

OPENING CRITER

COMMENTS :
Box 256
Folder 14

([R] - ITEM 1S RESTRICTED

HW 50955 Docld: 32282005 Page i i

| 2025 RELEASE | UNDER THE PRESIDENT. JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |. seme he

TOP SECRET

g 10
3
2 1 Mr. Phillips. I did not.
3
3 2 Mr. Schwarz. Did you know Jack Ruby?
E 3 Mr. Phillips. No, I did not.
4 Mr. Schwarz. Do youknow him under the name of Ruben-
5 stein?
6 Mr. Phillips. I did not.
7 Mr. Schwarz. What did you do between your work in Cuba
8 | and the Chile matter which you weré going. to: spend most of your
9 time on?
10 | Mr. Phillips. After the Bay of Pigs business I went to
ll || Mexico in late in 1961, and remained in Mexico until the very
J
Z 12 early part of 1965, when I was assigned to the Dominican
8.
: 13 | Republic fagmenres
3 ;
14 Mr. Schwarz. And then --
15 Mr. Phillips. I stayed in the Dominican Republic until
16 | the summer of 1967. 2

1? “. And after that I returned to Washington and became

18 the Chief of Cuban Operations through 1969.

19 In 1970 I went to Rio de Janierofaemoeativon Cl And

20 in 1971, I suffered the traumatic shock of being moved to

21] || Brasilia from Rio de Janiero. ef
Pisses,

22 In 1972 I went to Venezuelatast!
23 || And in the summer of 1973 I was asked to return as Chief of

24 | the then Western Hemisphere Division.

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

25 Mr. Schwarz. And is that the position you held until

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docld:322627005 Page 2


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

|

10

11

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

18

19

20

él

22

25

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

25

TOP SECRET

14
or the other which would enable you to form a judgment as
to his attitude toward either the subject of assassination or
the question as to what kind of an explicit order would be
necessary in order to justify Agency actions to actually
assassinate some one.

Mr. Phillips. No, because I never heard Mr. Helms even
get that close to the edge of such talk about such and such an
option or possibility, I never heard him talk that way.

Mr. Schwarz. Did you ever hear anybody in the Agency
talk that way? |

Mr. Phillips. Under traumatic conditions I have heard
human beings maybe with a few drinks or something like that
saying, my God, we would be better off if so and so were
bumped off or something.

But I have never heard two officers sit down and
seriously talk about such an option. And if anyone has ever r
said that, it is the same way some people might get out of line
and say almost anything.

Mr. Schwarz. Did you ever hear, in connection with

the Chile operation, that certain Chilean officers, specifi-~

cally a Major Marshall ewer tJthat they intended
to assassinate Allende?
Mr. Phillips. It was five years ago. But as I recall,

Major Marshall said a number of things. He was what I think

of as a wild man. I seem to recall something about, yes, a

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld: 32262005 Page 3


Prone (Area 202) 544-6000

10

11

12

135

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

i?

18

“19

20

al

ae

235

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

29

HY 50955 Docld: 322762005 Page 4

TOP SECRET

30

Mr. Schwarz. And you offered through{Colonel wimerw,
whom we will come to in a moment, $50,000 if they could
accomplish it, didn't you?

Mr. Phillips. I think that was the correct sum, yes.

mr. Schwarz. And you gave them prior to their attempt
on the 19th of October some tear gas and some gas masks to
help accomplish the kidnapping?

Mr. Phillips. That is true.

Mr. Schwarz. And subsequently you provided to the Val-
enzuela group some machine guns, didn't you?

Mr. Phillips. That is ture.

Mr. Schwarz. And those were going to be used in a
kidnapping effort by the Valenzuela group, and you knew that,
didn't.you?

Mr. Phillips. I recall that they were going: to be
used by’the group, and that kidnapping was a part of their
plans. I can't recall that they said they needed them spe-
cifically for the kidnapping. I do recall that the reason was -
the automatic reaction from Latin America is, why do people
need arms when they have got arms everywhere all over Latin
America.

And they said something about, their own arms could be
identified, and they needed some that couldn't be identified.
I don't recall if it was specifically mentioned: that it was

just for that. It was certainly understood that they might

TOP SECRET


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

WARD & PAUL

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

HW 50955

10
il
le
13
14
18
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
24

25

iw SEVUKE f
44

Consequently, I personally made this proposal, that we
establish what I called a false flag base of people that would
go from outside, and should there be any sort of flap, the
chances of linking it to the U.S. Government would be much
less, because they would appear to be from another nationality. |

Mr. Schwarz. I would like to read to you a cable -- is |
this cable of 27 September in the Senator's book? I know that
he asked for it after I came over.

Mr. Treverton. It is not.

Mr. Schwarz. I am going to read from a cable which

unfortunately is not in your book, but the key part is

relatively simple,

This is a cable, Mr. Phillips, dated September 27, 1970,
and it is signed by yourself and Mr. Broe. And it is sent to
the Station in Chile, and it contains the following about the
purposes of setting up the false flag office --

Mr. Phillips. We call it a base.

Mr. Schwarz. False. flag bases: “Each member of base
will enter and leave Chile with falst documents and operate as
a representative of his country rather than as anAmerican".

That is right, isn't it?

Mr. Phillips. That is true.

Mr. Schwarz. Continue:

"Having at least one key (Braz eben and one key (Argent an!

would be vital, and we have candidates."

TOP SECRET

DoclId: 32282005 Page 5

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

WARD & PAUL

410 First Street, $.E., Wasnington, D.C. 20003

HY 50955

10

ll

12

13

14

16

16

1?

18

19

20

al

22

25

24

25

_didates who can successfully pose as (Bune

wf SURE

45
And you did that.
Mr. Phillips. Yes.
Mr... Schwarz. And then it goes on as follows: "These

officers will perform the delicate shows with great flap
potential which cannot be done by Station personnel or any
Chilean."

That is right, isn't it?

Mr. Phillips. That is true.

Mr.Schwarz. And by flap potential: you meant exposure?

Mr. Phillips. Contacting screwballs such as Marshall,
that sort of thing.

Mr. Schwarz. But generally pursuing the Track II
activities?

Mr. Phillips. That is right.

Mr. Schwarz. Continuing: "An example. We have can-

Smazusltitany intelligence
officers." You did that, didn't you? an
- Mr. Phillips. Yes.

Mr. Schwarz. And this goes on: "If he approached, funde

and ran a Chilean General, any flap would be af
Mr. Phillips. Yes.

Mr. Schwarz. So the scheme was that not only would

the U.S. not be blamed, but other countries like
be blamed if something went wrong.

Mr. Phillips. Yes, this is particularly sensitive to me,

TOP SECRET

Docld: 322762005 Page 6


JP SECRET

fore However, that was it. It was a

ign “service officer}

Phone (Area 202) §44-6000

rS) devious move. It was the final result -- the idea being that

4 | if such a flap did occur, someone would think it was someone
5 other than the U.S. The idea of false flag operations is

6 not a new one. The idea I had of going to someone and saying,

7 why don't you be a spy for us, I don't work for the Soviets,

8 is not true,
9 But this is sort of new, the fact that action agents
ars ee) should pose as others. And yes, it is devious, but that

11 was the idea.

12 Senator Hart of Colorado. Mr. Phillips, what were

WARD & PAUL

13 their instructions if they were to be caught? Were they to go

14 to their death swearing they were ns} or whatever?
15 Mr. Phillips. I don't think it was quite that dramatic,

16 Senator. They came to Washington before they went down. And

1? I briefed them,and I think what <I said to them was, this
18 is going to be a toetigh and sensitive one, and you don't have

19 to go if you don't want to, because you culd get in real trouble.

20 ‘And if you get in trouble, I am not sure we can help

21 | you. — .

22 So, they shrugged their shoulders and went.

23 Mr. Schwarz. Did you tell the ® agp that you were

24 | sending someone down to pose as a an, and his instruc-

410 First Street, S.E., Washingtan, D.C. 20003

25 tions were that if he were caught he was to continue to pose

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:322627005 Page 7

Gt. Ph wie ol
g 47
¢ —
2 1 ‘ans’ were approached?
g a Mr. Phillips. It never occurred to us in our wildest
F 5 dreams to do that.
4 Mr. Schwarz. I suppose the relationships between con-
5 tinuing intelligence services were things that were
6 very’ important to preserve, and that we had very close and
7 delicate relationships with the otheriintelligence services.
8 Mr. Phillips. We do. And if there had been such a
9 J would be quite unhappy with us. But I

10 thought that was better than letting the world know that was
ll | a U.S. Citizen down there.

12 Mr. Schwarz. You go on in the cable of September 27

WARD & PAUL

13 to say this:

14 | "Headquarters believes this false flag was manned by

15 efficers who have repeatedly proved their ability to operate
16 and recruit under false colors, will give Station great flexi-

17 bility in handling delicate and fast-moving situations secure-

18 ly.*

19 So, the use of false flag persons, at least judging

20 from this cable, is something repeatedly done by the CIA?
21 Mr. Phillips. Yes, and by all intelligence services --_
22 || not all, but all major intelligence services. If you are living

23 || overseas and a man comes up to you and’ says, hey, I see you

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

24 || are a Marxist, and a man comes up and says, I am from Havana

25 | and we would like you to work with the Cuban intelligence

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docld: 322762005 Page 6


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

WARD & PAUL

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

HW 50955

10.

li

12

13

14

15

16

1?

18

19

20

a1

ae

23

24

25

iJP Seki
48

service, he might not be from Havana, he might be from the

Soviets, from us, or G26 Brazilians. +

So, it is not an unusual practice.

Mr. Schwarz. Incidentally, you just let drop one thing
in your testimony a moment ago. You said that in your 25-year
involvement with intelligence matters you had been bothered
by your activities on only two occasions, one of which was
Chile.

And then you said what the other one was. What was that?

Mr. Phillips. I was in Washington attending the Chiefs
of Station course, which is a training course for people who

are going out on their first assignment as Chief of Station.

When President Johnson decided to send 22,000 Marines
to the Dominican Republic, it occurred to me that in order to
protect and evacuate American citizens, that that job might
have been done with 400 Marines. I was scheduled to go there

ef And I just wasntt sure that I

wanted to be associated with something like that. But I de-
cided, well, I suppose President Johnson knows what he is
--doing, I will go ~- I am going to go along. So, I did go
along.
Senator Schweiker. One question on your differentiation
between where you drew a personal commitment line on assassin-
ations, but not overthrow. I have trouble quite understanding

it, because as I understand Chile, the plot was to overthrow

TOP SECRET

DoclId:32282005 Page 9


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

10

il

12

WARD & PAUL

15
16
1?
18
19
20
al
22
25

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

20

iif DSEWKE |
. 55

Mr. Phillips. There is no question that I could under--
stand why anyone concerned with world affairs, looking at
Chile and what was happening there, would be concerned.

Salvadore Allende made his first statement saying that
he was a Socialist and wanted to change the order some 32
years beforehe was elected. |

Over the years he made it quite clear that he was an ar-

dent socialist. Before this decision was made I believe that

"we had a visit from a man who had the code name ofgaRiely he

was a Cuban intelligence officer.- The Cubans were moving in
rapidly. The influence was great. I think that they saw a lot
at stake, another Cuba in Latin America type of thing, the
same thing perhaps that motivated President Johnson to send
22,000 rather than 400.

So,I-can understand why they thought this was going,
in the long strategic sense, in the “long range against::our
interests. But that is an assumption.

It is true that Allende very definitely made it clear
that he wanted to turn Chile inte a Marxist state. The differ-
ence was that Allende refused to take Fidel Castro's advice
and use violence. As I understand it, Fidel Castro went to
Chile and said, if you want your revolution to last you are
going to have to use violence. #

I found it interesting to read in this morning's paper

where someone from Portugal came back from Cuba and said,

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docld: 32282005 Page 10


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

10

11

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

al

22

29

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

24

25

HW 50955 Docld: 32282005 Page .11

Bt. € Diets HOE E
59
activities?

Mr. Phillips. No, sir. I was (€HWeessexenr

s§called back in 1970 for
six or seven weeks for what we are referring to as Track II.
Senator MOndale. Now, in that position you familiarized
yourself with the Chilean government, Allende and so on,
and tried to become as expert as you could in the political
forces and so on?
Mr. Phillips. Yes. And in addition to that, Senator,
one of the reasons I was called back was that I had lived
for many years in Chile, so I knew something about it.

Senator Mondale. And itis:your: judgment as I think I

just heard, that although Allende was a Marxist, and espoused

Marxism, he also said he wanted to achieve this through the |

democratic process, and although there was some rough stuff

Be

on the press, and so on, essentially that was the course he
was pursuing, is that correct?

Mr. Phillips. I don't recall that he said it, but
he indeed acted that way.

Senator Mondale. But in fact the course he was pur-
suing was an attempt to achieve the Marxist philosophy with
the population support under constitutional system? ’
Mr. Phillips. Yes, essentially that is true, sir.

Senator. Mondale. Thank you.

Mr. Schwarz. I would like to read to you in connection

TOP SECRET

Phone {Area 202) 544-6006

WARD & PAUL

HY 50955

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1?

18

19

20

21

22

25

24

29

Docld:32282005 Page 12

iP SECRET
. 65
assignment by the President and by the White House?

Mr. Phillips. Senator, it doesn't make any difference
today. On the contrary, since Watergate the people say, why .°.
should we? Before Watergate it was another ball game.

The President was the Commander in Chief in every sense of the
word.

And you said, who am I, a GS-15 bureaucrat, to say that
we shouldn't do this? But that has changed since Watergate.

Senator Hart of Colorado. One other question.

I call your attention in our briefing books to what is
Tab C, a cable which has your name at the end of it dated 21
September 1970, page 3 of 7. Are you an author or co~author
of that cable?

Mr. Phillips. I believe I was the authenticating
officer, yes.

Senator Hart of Colorado. What does that mean?

Mr. Phillips. That meant that the signature on the
right of those cables is someone that is the authenticating
officer in a sense, here is a fellow that is supposed to know
the situation.

Senator Hart of Colorado. But who wrote it, I guess

eo

is what I am after.

Mr. Phillips. I would guess that this cable was probably

Mews Bounzie, and perhaps myself, perhaps it was

written by
joint. But (Meee folwrote an awful lot of them. But by

-

.°. * TOP SECRET


i.vr? SEVWAE i
66
1 putting my signature on the authenticating part I said I was

a a part of it. And then, of course, the releasing officer is

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

° the one that accepts the responsibility.

4 . Senator Hart of Colorado. Page 3 of 7 which has
a) the paragraph identified as the paragraph F contains the follow-

6 ing sentence or part of a sentence: You suggest sending

7 us cables outlining objectives and course of events, et

8 cetera, and he said, always conditioned by the fact that we hav
9 to keep our feet in the mud of practicality, and our eyes

10 | on the stars.

11 What does that mean in Agency talk?

12 Mr. Phillips. Senator, I want to assure you with real

13 seriousness that I am not the author of that phrase.

WARD & PAUL

14 Senator Hart of Colorado. It must have caught your eye,

15 however.

16 Mr. Phillips. It did catch my eye. If this was indeed

17 a joint venture, I can promise that that was 4D
18 contribution, and if you ever meet him you will understand

19 | why. He was addicted to picturesque speech. And «looking

20 back, all I can say is that it probably went out at four
21 || o'clock in the morning, and we were very tired, and I just
22} didn't want to argue about that phrase, and I let it go. I

23 || am not sure what it means even now.

416 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

94 SEnator Hart of Colorado. Neither am I. But it seems

BS to describe a lot of what we have heard around here for the

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docid: 32262005 Page 13

1OP SECRET

76
L Now, I read that as Helms' position being that the

z assassination of Schneider was something which presented the

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

) opportunity for the very thing that the U.S. wished to have

4 done.

5 Do you agree with me?

6 Mr. Phillips. No, I can't agree with you on that. I am

7 not sure about the suggestion from the language. But I will

8 tell you the immediate reaction in our little task force when

9 | the word came that Schneider was dead, that is it, it is *indshe
10. Knowing. Chileans, the moment that that violence occurred,

ll || Chileans, with the possible exception of a nut such as
12 Marshall, immediately said,this is it, that is enough. There

15 | was still that tradition over the years. And I think that the

WARD & PAUL

14 moment we heard of it and we discussed it we Said, that is
15 it, there will be no more. In Many countries in Latin America
16 that would have been the Signal for further action, weakness,

1? and so forth. But in this case it was the end of the

1g | business.
19 Mr. Schwarz. I want to run through with you the activi+

20 || ties which were being undertaken with the Valenzuela group

£1 || and with the Viaux group. In the case of Viaux, was that one
22 || of the assignments that the false flag officers had?

23 Mr. Phillips. Yes.

24 Mr. Schwarz. And in the case of Valenzuela, was that

"410 First Street, $.€., Washington, 0.C. 20003

25 | one of the assignments that to%

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld: 322862005 Page 14

Phone (Area 262) 544-6000

WARD & PAUL

410 First Street, S.€., Washington, 0.C. 20003

HW 50955

10

il

12

15

16

17?

18

19

20

21

22

25

24

25

DoclId: 32282005 Page 15

TOP SECRET

77

Mr. Phillips.

Yes, I believe it was(@olner:

Cam that was in touch with that group.
Mr. Schwarz. And the two teams worked in tandem,
didn't they?
Mr. Phillips. Are you referring to Chilean teams?

Mr. Schwarz. No, the false flag team (@nateoioner.

Mr. Phillips. Only in the sense that there might have
been some central direction from the office or from headquar-

ters. I don't believe that anyone of the false flaggers had

Eee. 4

the slightest idea that{ june was working with us.

mméet} ~- I don't know that

inte

Sheth

So, no, they didn't work in tandem, except in sense of
direction from the Station.

Mr. Schwarz. Headquarters down there, and you in
Washington, were working with both the Valenzuela groupand
the viaux group?

Mr. Phillips. Yes, sir.

Senator Hart of Colorado. Are you in a chain here,
counsel?

Mr. Schwarz. I am in a chain, but it is easily interrup-
tible.

Senator Hart of Colorado. Mr. Phillips, did we

chronologically “-- maybe the «staff can answer that, I am just

TOP SECRET


Phone (Area 202} 544-6000
ae)

10

il

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

17

18

"19

20

21

22

po

410 First Street, S-E., Washington, D.C. 20003

24

25

iP SECKEI
. 92
Viaux group was really acting in order to carry out step one
of the Valenzuela group's plan?

Mr. Phillips. Yes, to address this point specifically.

Obviously when the guns were passed ShRoughacotoneilee wis

eae ae

and the death occurred so soon after, immediately we
thought they probably used those guns. It was then when we
read the press reports that General Schneider died from hand-
gun wounds. And that was the first time we thought we could
really be sure in our own mind that it wasn't directly
the Valenzuela group using those guns.

Mr. Schwarz. What about the gas masks that had
been furnished earlier? WAsn't there evidence that there
were gas masks in the care of the persons who attempted to
abduct General Schneider?

Mr. PHillips. I don't recall. There may very well have
been, but I am not real sure about that.

Mr. Schwarz. I am going to go to another area, which

questions on the relationship between the two groups.

is the relationship . If there are any

Senator Hart of Colorado. Concerning the October 19
attempts, under Tab 4 on page 7 of the longer memorandum
by Dianne LaVoy under October 18 there is reference to a cable
A66 dated October 19. And concerning the connection of
these various conspirators, it says: “Valenzuela meets with.

wemy. attaché and gives him a 15 point plan for coup to be

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page 16


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000
raw)

10

il

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

24

20

1UP SECRET

carried out on October 19.

#4

the Carabineros away from the Schneier houseto assure that the
abduction will not be interferred with. General Viaux is
knowledgeable of the above operation, but is not directly
involved." .

What do you think "not directly involved" refers to?
Why not just not involved? |

Mr. Phillips. I think that probably referred to what
I was saying before, that in these situations it is not very
unusual that there is not some talk that everybody has a cousin
that works with some group type of thing.

And I believe that it must refer to that.

Mr. Schwarz. Taking the actual cable, is the actual
cable in the Senator's books?

Mr. Inderfurther. No.

Mr. Schwarz. Let me read the full text of that para-
graph from the cable. It is a cable apparently dated 19
October on the subject of General Viaux:

- "General Viaux, knowledgeable of above operation, but not
directly involved. He has been sent to Vina to stay with
prominent physician. Will be seen in public places during 19
and 20 October to demonstrate fact that above operation is
not his doing. Will be allowed to return to Santiago at end of

week."

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page i7


Prone (Area 202) 544-6000

WARD & PAUL

410 First Street, S.£., Washington, D.C. 20003

HY 50955

10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

29

Bocld: 32282005 Page 18

TOP SECRET
. 94

Now, I can't read that language any way other than
meaning that the Valenzuela group and the Viaux group were in
close cooperation, that was part of the abduction plan, it
was agreed between the two that Viaux would appear -~ would
be out of town so that he would not appear to be involved.
And you have to read that, do you not, as meaning that there
was a close cooperation on this effort between the two groups.

Mr. Phillips. Yes, I think. you. do have to read it that
way.

Miss Culbreth. Would you. identify that paper more
than just the statement?

Mr. Phillips. Cable sent to headquarters A66.

Mr. Schwarz. No. A66, eyes only to --

Mr. Inderfurth. DCOS, which was @i®

Mr. Treverton. It is Tab M, it is in the book.
Mr. Schwarz. I think we ought to mark that as an ex-
hibit.
(The document referred to was
marked Phillips Exhibit No. 2

for identification.)

TOP SECRET


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

10

il

12

WARD & PAUL

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

al

22

25

24

410 First Street, S.E., Wasnington, O0.C. 20003

25

iWP SECRET
. i01

As for the narrow part of your question, by all means
it is a bad way to do business,

Senator Schweiker. Go ahead.

Mr. Schwarz. ‘Picking up on Senator Schweiker's line
of quesioning, would you show the witness Tab A, the docu-
ment Tab A.

It is a memorandum for the record by Mr. Broe dated 17
September, and then that is crossed out and it says 16 Sep-
tember, “Subject, Genesis of Project".

Incidentally, what was the code name for this project?
Was it/FU Bel#? |

Mr. Phillips.

Mr. Schwarz.

Mr. Phillips.

“Jetters there indicaté a geographical araa. So it would bégay

Fdot-of different ones, but that would mean Chile. FU Réel,
e— ~ ~ — 7 a amen et en im ate

Belt means nothing J

Mr. Schwarz. Everybody keeps saying that so many of
these things mean nothing. Who is responsible for these
names?

Mr« Phillips. There is somebody who is supposed to have
a big liest to make sure that they were not duplicated.
And I think sometimes there is a pixie-like quality that comes
out in those things.

Senator Schweiker. That is an understatement, to call

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld: 322782005 Page 19


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

10
li
12

‘13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

al

22

25

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

25

ion . iwPe sR E fl
, 102
it pixie-like.

Mr.. Phillips. But many times the cryptonums mean ab-
solutely nothing, they have no Meaning at all.

Senator Schweiker.. SRRIFLE, ROGUE ELEPHANT --

Mr. Phillips. I am sorry, Sir.

Senator Schweiker. We have come across a few other good
ones,

Mr. Schwarz. I don't know if ‘you have ever seen that
decument, and it doesn't matter. But the end of paragraph 2
indicates that the instructions from the President concluded:

“The Agency is to carry out this mission without
coordination with the Department of State or Defense".

Mr. Phillips. Yes.

Mr. Schwarz. And that was your instruction?

Mr. Phillips. That is correct.

Mr.- Schwarz. Now, in fact, of course, you did use in

as

Chile a man calledGo! el ‘Wimert.¥

Mr. Phillips. Yes.

Mr. Schwarz. And he was in the Defense Department?

Mr. Phillips. That is correct.

Mr. Schwarz. And he was assigned -- he was instructed
to take his instructions only from the CIA inChile, is that
right?

Mr. Phillips. Yes.

Mr. Schwarz. And he was instructed indeed not to tell

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docid: 32262005 Page 20


Pnone (Area 202} 544-6000

10

ll

le

13

_ WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

17

18

19

él

22

235

24

410 First Street, S-E., Washington, D.C. 20003

20

20

IVP SEVLKET
. 103
his superior in Chile, the man who was in charge of the
defense attache system down there?
Mr. Phillips. That is true, sir.

‘iWimert was the man from/the Army] and then

Bal

Mr. Schwarz.

=>

there was someone else in tHe=Air“Frorgggethe Nays and there

panes cee,

was a hoss?
Mr. Phillips. That is right.
Mr. Schwarz. And{Wimer& was told not to tell that boss?

Mr. Phillips. I believe that is true, yes.

Vonel Wimeme

Mr. Schwarz. © Now, how did it happen that feo
came to work for and under the direction of the CIA?

Mr. Phillips. I believe the explanation for that was

Se lea warm

A

ent

the fact thatf@ had been around Latin America,

spoke perfect Spanish, his hobby was riding horses, and he
developed really marvelous relationships with the military of
officers that he had contact with. And I think it was just
that someone recognized the fact that if we had been given the
task of getting a coup going using the military, why not take

advantage of & that they liked the most,

trusted the most, and saw the most? It was perfectly natural
for him to spend his weekends with these people.

Mr. Schwarz. And so he was a natural and helpful asset.
But how was it arranged that he would work for the CIA, and
lay that question against the instruction from President

Nixon that the Defense Department was not to know, how did

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:3227682005 Page 271

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

WARD & PAUL

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

HY 50955

10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

25

Docld:32282005 Page 22

TOP SECRET

104
you accomplish it?
Mr. Phillips. I don't know. I have had my memory
refreshed by looking at some documents now, and I know
that someone came and gave me the piece of paper in this book

that has been signed by General Philpott. which was a message

SA) saying, cooperate with the CIA. What the process
was for getting that approval, or who went to see Philpott",
I wasn't involved with that, I just don't recall.

Mr. Schwarz. Did you ever see Philpott ?

Mr. Phillips. I never did.

Mr. Schwarz. Did you ever see --=

Mr. Phillips. I may have seen Philpott in some large
meeting or something like that, but I don't recall any

meeting with any of the generals. I was relatively too junior

to have attended these meetings. This would have been Mr.

Broe, Mr. Karamessines, and so forth. And I would have been
left back in the shop, sort of, I think. |

Mr. Schwarz. And did you ever see or talk to Bennett?

Mr. Phillips. Not to my recollection. I think not.

Mr. Schwara. I asked you if you ever saw General Phil-
pott, or did you ever talk to .General Philpott?

Mr. Phillips. I don't recall such a talk. During this
entire period, for instance, I never went outside of our build-
ing.I was there sort of in the shop. And other people would do

that sort of thing.

_ TOP SECRET


Phone {Area 202) 544-6000

10

il

le

13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

17

‘18

19

20

al

22

23

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

89

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page 23

iVr JECKE I
107

Mr. Schwarz. Is that the form in which you sent the
message which is contained in Exhibit 3 to Chile?

Mr. Phillips. It is.

Mr. Schwarz. Now, apparently Exhibit 4, which you
drafted initially, said that it was from General Bennett, and
then it was changed to say it was from General Philpott.

Did you make that change?

Mr. Phillips. That is my handwriting above that said
Philpott, and someone else's handwriting below that said
Bennett. I think the signature on the original document
was from Philpott. But that is my change there.

Mr. Schwarz. And is the change on the second page --
the sentence reads:

jimert¥ to retain copy of this

"Do not allow §Gosor
message", and then in handwriting it is asserted "Note that
General Bennett is out of the country".

Mr. Phillips. Yes, that is my handwriting.

Mr. Schwarz. Having seen that, and these changes, what
do you recall about the circumstances that led you to make
those changes?

Mr. Phillips. It-:‘is possible that this message is one
of the rare messages that sometimes occur, that you are handed
something that is written out, and there is no secretary,
and it is two o'clock in the morning or something like that.

On some occasions you will take a very rough draft and ask

TOP SECRET


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

10
il

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

17

18

19

21

22

25

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

24

25

20°

EJ SECKET
. 108
the communicators to send that, and youwill then later write
for the record, and have typed for the record the formal cable.
I am not sure about that.

Mr. Schwarz. You think what you sent used General Ben-
nett's name and not General Philpott's name?

Mr. Phillips. I don't recall. But I believe if that had .
been the case that not only would the change have been made,
but there would have been some sort of note on the side or
something. So, I believe that the original must have said
Philpott. But I can't be absolutely positive.

Mr. Schwarz. But the original typed version onthe
first page used Bennett's name, right?

Mr. Phillips. Yes.

Mr. Schwarz. Now, I am puzzled, because if you had
previously obtained the document which is Exhibit 3, the

"suggested message to be sent & | from General

Bennett", and which is in fact signed with a::name that
purports to be General Philpott's, if you had obtained that
before drafting the typed message, I take it you would have use
Philpott's name in the typed message and not Bennetts’.

Mr. PHillips. Yes.

Mr. Schwarz. . So that suggests that you typed the typed
message before you obtained the document which is Exhibit 3
that has Mr. Philpott's siqnature? |

Mr. Phillips. No, I would not have done that. I would

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 DocId:322982005 Page 24


IMP SECKEI

lil

to]

3

6

3

5 i iwasn't aware of this.

o

E e Mr. Schwarz. After that initial occasion involving
o _

c =z a 8

F ss) faigalr: ta

the use of Philpott's name in order to instruct@galmes
4 work for the CIA, was anybody from the Defense Intelligence
9 Agency further brought into the operation which we have been
6 calling Track II?

7 Mr. PHillips. My answer to that until a few minutes

8 ago would have been, I don't recall that. I have seen a documan

9 since then that indicates that someone else was talked to

10 | later. If I knew that I had forgotten it, or perhaps never
1l |) knew it -- I must have known it if I saw the message. But

12 || until I saw this thing, to refresh my memory I would have

13 || said, I think that Philpott was the man.

WARD & PAUL

14 Mr. Schwarz. Was the man, and was only contacted on
15 | that one occasion? 4
16 Mr. Phillips. As far as I know, that one occasion.

1? | But I didn't necessarily know what was outside of my little

18 room with windows, and so there were. other people doing other

: 19 || things.
: 20 Mr. Schwarz. Let's then look at the other documents.
: 21 Would you mark Tab G as Exhibit 5.
:
i 22 ; (The document referred to was
: 23 marked Phillips Exhibit No. 5
: 24 for identification.)

25

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page 25


iWr DECKEI
. 112

1 Mr. Schwarz. And this is a cable releasing officer Willila

“ | Broe, authenticating officer David A Phillips, dated Octo-

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

) ber 14, 1970, from CIA headquarters to Santiago, CIA.
4 And it says:
5 "Please deliver the following message (‘destroy immedi- :

6 | ately') BE eyes only from Lieutenant General

7 Bennett. "

8 Now, on what basis did you authenticate that message

9 which purports to bef iwimert? from Lieutenant General
10} Bennett?
il. Mr. Phillips. Obviously -- not obviously, but because

12 || I presume in this case -- I am sure in this case once again

WARD & PAUL

13 there was a document that was handed to me and I was told,

14 | send this down. ‘In order to make this point, I was in there,
15 | and it was sort of a direct operational thing, and when I

16 || authenticated them I did it because I knew what was going on.
17 |. If Bill Broe, my boss, came in and said, here is a document .

18 that we want to send, or if Tom Karamessines said, I worked on

3
8 19 the assumption that they were passing on to me the authority
9
¢ 20 to authenticate, and I didn't necesarily turn to them and say,
o
& 21 || hey --
ES ;
Wl 22 Mr Schwarz. Prove that --
5 23 Mr. Phillips. Prove that you have been talking with
3 24 General Bennett -- I obviously didn't do that.
t
25 Mr. Schwarz. Then mark as Exhibit 6 an undated docu-

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docid: 32262005 Page 26

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

10

il

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

25

HW 50955 Docld: 32282005 Page 27

iP SECREE

(The document referred to was
Marked Phillips Exhibit No. 6

for identification.)

TOP SECRET


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

LO

ll

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14
15
16
1?
18
19
20
21

(22
23

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

20

HW 50955 DoclId: 32262005 Page 26

IVP SECRET
. 114

Mr. Schwarz. Now, that purports to be from LTG Bennett

Wanees, and has the text in it which you sent on

AR ait ay Se s;
eon Colle nou ey,

Mr. Phillips. Yes.

Mr. Schwarz. And what is your best recollection as to
who handed you that document?

Mr. Phillips. I cannot say definitely who did that.
There were many occasions when Bill Broe would walk into the
office and say, here is something to send. There were others
which would come in a manila envelope with a yellow
forwarding slip on it. There are times,I am sure, when I
would go into Bill Broe's office, and he would say, by the
way, send this.

I simply cannot recall the circumstances -in which some-
one handed me that and said, send it to Chile. And I was paying
less attention to those things, because I was in effect the
postman for people doing other things. |

Mr. Schwarz. Do you have any recollection at all
about this document?

Mr. Phillips. No, I am afraid I don't.

Mr. Schwarz. What is your reading of the signature on
that document?

Mr. PHillips. Well, it certainly looks like the sig-
nature which was on the other document which was said to be

Philpott's. But I am not an authority on these things.

TOP SECRET


iUP SECRET
. 119

ache.

1 Gmilitary attache. jana those instructions went down. Apparently

2 it would appear that theremight be something here where they

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

) are going to bring in more people, as is known to several per-
4 sons, it says down here.
5 And itmay have been because there was an attempt there

6 not to say to these new people, by the way, we want to talk

? to you about something we are doing that we have kind of

8 already done. That is theonly thing I can come up with. I

9 can't give you a better explanation than that.
10 Mr. Schwarz. This you characterize also as a puzzling
il || and strange document?

12 Mr. Phillips. Yes. And I am sorry that I can't be

135 || more helpful on this. But I was treating these -- these things

WARD & PAUL

14 || were coming through my mail shoot, and I was putting headings

15 | on them. Even though I signed them and so forth, I wasn't

16 | paying the attention to things that I did to my own job.

17 Mr. Schwarz. That is an explanation that deals with
18 some of the earlier documents. But here in the first place

19 || you were both the releasing officer and the authenticating

20 || officer. |

Pal And second, this is not simply taking some other message
ee || and putting a heading on it, is it? This is a substantive

23 || document purporting to explain a problem to your CIA Station

e4 | Chief in Santiago, right, do you agree with that?

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

25 Mr. Phillips. I do. And I agree that it is puzzling,

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docid: 32262005 Page 29


Phone (Area 262) 544-6000

10

il

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

L?7

18

19

20

21

22

25

410 First Street, S.E., Wasnington, 0.C. 20003

24

25

iWP SECRET
, 120
and there are some holes here. Perhaps I can be helpful when
you have further testimony on this to help me job my memory.
I can't remember the rationale for this.
Mr. Schwarz. Let's take some of the statements that
are in the telegram and deal with them specifically.

Paragraph 2: "There seems little doubt this will

It has confused all of us here, so I suppose it would
have confused him.

"Background for his information: both Generals Bennett
and Philpott have been briefed by Broe". |

Who told you that?

Mr. PHillips. | I don't know for sure, but I presume
this must have been Bill Broe.

Mr. Schwarz. Do you have any recollection of his telling
you that?

Mr. Phillips. I do not. But I don't think that I --
I don't see myself releasing that cable without being sure that
Broe knew what was going out in that cable. In other words,
that is hthe kind of cable that I wouldn't have released
just because someone else came in and said that sort of thing.
This cable I think must have originated either with a dis-
cussion with Broe that said, look, send the following word,
write up something like this, or perhaps some notes, and say,

do a cable from it, or just as possible -- and I can't read it

TOP SECRET.

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page 30


iP SECKEI

23 The point’I.am trying to make is, if Mr. Broe were

24 leaving the office and we had gone through this exchange, and

3 121
g
g 1 here -- isthe fact that it was actually drafted by someone
i 2 else that was working in my shop,§ op or someone
5 3 else, that went in and talked to Broe. Maybe I was doing some-
a | thing else, and they came to me with a typed thing and said,
5 here, I cleared this with Broe, and so he signed both things.
6 So I really can't remember.
: : at es
? Mr. Schwarz. Under either assumption, either that Broe
8 spoke to you directly or that someone on your staff
9 spoke to Broe, you had Broe around at the time this cable goes
10 |) out?
11]. Mr. Phillips. Yes.
2
i 12 Mr. Schwarz. Then why wouldn't he sign it?
13 Mr. Phillips. Here is one thing. At the time the cable
14 went out -- I can't remember well enough if it was late at
15 night.
. 16 Mr. Schwarz. Does the time up above indicate 11:59?
1? Mr. Phillips. Where do you see that?
18 _ Mr. Schwarz. In the upper lefthand corner. It has
3 19 a date 14 October 17, and right above that is 11:59 --
: 20 Mr. Phillips. Right.
: 21 ; Mr. Schwarz. -~- in the customary place for the time.
3
ui 22 Mr. Phillips. I don't see that on this copy. .
3

25 || he had done it with someone else in my office, he might well

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 DoclId:32262005 Page 31

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

10

il

Le

“13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

235

24

4106 First Street, 5.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

20

IVP SECKEI
127
and saying, look, we want you to go along with this and use

Lonel Wimert down there, he is really important to us, and

Ge

that sort of thing, and was perhaps slightly embarrassed
by the fact that they had been doing that before. That is the
only explanation I can give.

Mr. Schwarz. So you would assume that these new
interested parties and the several persons referred to in
the two sentences are persons who were in higher authority
than Bennett and Philpott?

Mr. Phillips. I assume that, but do not know. I just --
this thing was being so closely held, it just doesn't seem
logical to me that they would start going outside and down,

I thought that they would go outside and up. But I say, I
only assume that.

Mr.Schwarz. You have characterized Exhibit 7 as itself
being sort of puzzling. And the situation it deals with, as
you now describe it, is one that is kind of ticklish, isn't it?

Mr. Phillips. I understand.

Mr. Schwarz. The CIA had been using{iwa and knew

some people in higher authority than General Bennett, which
would mean very senior in the Defense Department, right?
Mr. Phillips. Yes.
Mr. Schwarz. or outside the Defense Department, but

very senior persons. They apparently are expressing an in-

terest, and according to this telegram, or your reconstruction

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docid: 32262005 Page 32


iWr SECKE !

128

1 of it, General Bennett and General Philpott feel that they are

a embarrassed to refute the fact that they had already been doing

Pnone {Area 202) 544-6000

5 || the work for the CIA
4 Now, all those things were not ordinary garden variety

5 || daily events, were they?

6 Mr. Phillips. They were not.
7 Mr. Schwarz. You don't remember this at all?
8 Mr. Phillips. No, and I didn't want to imply that it

9 was necessarily because General Philpott would have been
10 embarrassed, it could have been within CIA as well.

il But this rather unusual step was made because of the
12 || talents of the military men, to bring him into a program

13 that you weren't even talking with the State Department about.

WARD & PAUL,

14°} And so that indeed was unusual to a great degree. And I am
15 really very sorry to appear to be so vague about these things
16 || that I obviously had something to do with.

1? But my explanation is that I was doing a certain job,

18 and that other’ people were outside, and Mr. Karamessines would
19 || be talking with Mr. Helms about something, and this, that and
20 || the other, and I was on the day-by-day operation side, and when
21 someone would come in and say, we want something to go down

22 || to Wimert, and it has something to do with General Philpott,

23 | I didn't pay the kind of attention I would to it if it had

24 || been one of our operations.

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

25 ' Mr. Schwarz. Go back up to the beginning at paragraph 2

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page 33


" Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

10

11

12

13

WARD & FAUL

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

25

fOP SECRET
129
there were it says, "There is no doubt that this will confuse
Background for his information".
Now, there are two ways in which those words "for his
information" can be read. One is that it is the genuine

background.

The other is that it is a story to be given wait
his information, which is the fact, if you know, and which way
doyou read it if you do not know what the facts are?

Mr. Phillips. I assume that it is the true story, because
nowhere during this period did I encounter anything, nor do
I remember anything that I thought was devious to the extent
‘of falsehood in putting something down like that.

So, I assume that it is really for his background of
what happened.

Mr. Schwarz. And you don't remember from where you got
the information which you provided in this cable?

Mr. Phillips. I do not. Perhaps I can be more helpful
after you talk to others. But I simply do not.

Mr. Schwarz. The last paragraphs make the notation

"that we must advise GEneral Bennett time when fume ne shown"
the telegram. which is Exhibit 3.

Did you advise General Bennett?

Mr. Phillips. I did not. If it was done ~~ and I
presume it was -- I was not involved, and wouldn't have been

involved. And they would not have sent me over to see General

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page 34


Phone (Area 202} 544-6000

nue)

11

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14
15
16
1?
18
19
20
21
22
23

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

29

HW 50955 Docld: 32282005 Page 35

iMV@P SECKEI
130

Bennett, who was the head of DIA at the time. So, I don't
know that it was.

Mr. Schwarz. Which is the tab at which the reply
from Wimert is located? Is it kK?

Mr. Treverton. kK, yes.

Mr. Schwarz. Would you mark as the next exhibit, Exhibit

8, another cable to headquarters, "Eyes only for Lieutenant

General Bennett Eton.
(The document referred to was
marked Phillips Exhibit No. 8

for identification.)

TOP SECRET

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

nue)

il

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

1?

18

19

20

al

2a

23

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

25

131
Mr. Schwarz. Can you tell from the face of it, are we
correct that this is a document that was sent from the CIA

station in Santiago to CIA headquarters purporting to come

ce and purporting to be directed to Lieutenant
General Bennett?

Mr. Phillips. That is true.

Mr. Schwarz. In the ordinary course to whom would
such a cable go? And the second question, who would have the
responsibility of passing information on to General Bennett?

Mr. Phillips. In the ordinary course of events this cabl
would have come to me where I was working in the sense of an
info copy and this, that and the other.

The action on this cable would have certainly have gone
at least to Mr.Broe, and possibly higher, because it says,
this is his message to the head of another government
service. And so it would have gone to that level.

Mr. Schwarz. And in the ordinary course it would have
come to you first, and then it would have been passed on to
either Mr. Broe or someone higher to take action?

Mr. Phillips. For action -- not always. Sometimes a
cable will come in and there will be more than one copy.

And right away the action copy will go to the other fellow, and
then you get the information copy, and so forth.

Mr. Schwarz. Can you tell from the face of this cable

whether there would have been more than one copy?

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Doclda:322627005 Page 36.


Prone (Area 202) 544-6000

10
11
12

“13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

22

23

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

25

21

(WP SECRET
. 132
Mr. Phillips. There is no indicator to say who it went
to.
Mr. Schwarz. Does the"eyes only"have any significance
to you in the third line?

Mr. Phillips. Only in the sense that what §€

ment, but not through regular channels, and not to anyone else
other than General Bennett.

Mr. Schwarz. Did it go to General Bennett?

Mr. Phillips. I do not know.

Mr. Schwarz. And did you pass it to someone?

Mr. Phillips. If it did not go it would have been
highly unusual for amessage to come in from overseas saying,
give this to the head of another Agency, and for it not to
be delivered it would have been extremely unusual.

Mr. Schwarz. What would le the normal form of its
delivery? Would there be a cover note put on it?

Mr. Phillips. (It would have probably been folded
into an envelope and delivered by hand. Because if it is
really an “eyes only" message of such import, if it goes
through a communications channel, it means that they are going
to be operators of machinery to see it, and so forth. If

an American Ambassador overseas wants to get a very sensitive

message up he has the option of sending it to us and saying,

will you please hand carry this over to the Secretary of State?

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docld: 32282005 Page 37


IVP SECKEI!I

8 137
Z .
2 1 Mr. Schwarz. This message states:
Oo
° a . .
g 2 es "Please deliver the following message, (‘destroy imme~
ne HS 3
¢ = st :
z 20g iately') Sto. eyes only from Lieutenant General
2 ath ;
OV
oe Bennett." And the message was: "For your information suspen-
ON
Se a sion temporarily imposed on MAP and FMS has been rescinded’®.,
Se .
FF Vo What are MAP and FMS.
LY
g
? Mr. Phillips. Military Assistance of some kind or
8 another, Military Arms Procurement, or something like that.
9 Mr. Schwarz. Military Assistance Program?
10 Mr. Phillips. That is probably it.
11 Mr. Schwarz. And what is FMS?
ad
2
< 12 Mr. Inderfurther. Foreign Military Sales. _
:
: 13 Mr. Schwarz. Continuing: "This action does not, \
2 .

14 || repeat not, imply change in our estimated situation. On the
15 || contrary, it is intended to place us in a posture in: which
16 || we can formally cut off assistance if Allende elected and

17 | situation develops as we anticipate. Request up date

18 | of situation".

: 19 Now, Bennett's job at that time was what?

3 20 Mr. Phillips. I believe he was the Chief of DIA.

§

: 21 Mr. Schwarz. Defense Intelligence Agency?

; 20 Mr. Phillips. Yes.

z 23 Mr. Schwarz. Is the Defense Intelligence Agency

: a4 || responsible for decisions to military assistance programs?
s

25 Mr. Phillips. My opinion is that they are not.

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page 36


Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

10
11

11111 12

13

WARD & PAUL

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

20

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

20

HW 50955 Docld:32262005

TOP SECRET

138
Mr. Schwarz. And they don't really have anything to

do with that, do they?

Mr. Phillips. I would gather from this message that
it is simply an explanation from ~~ it says General Bennett
+, to explain something. As a part o Track I, and the
whole business, all of these different options were being
looked at and people were saying, let's don't help them with
military things because it looks like Allende is going to get
in. And the decision: was made, well, let's go ahead
and do it. And this was apparently sort of a request for
to give him some rationale behind it when he
was down there running - away trying to foment the coup,
saying, why is the U.S. Government still helping this govern-
ment?

I am speculating. But this was another one of those
messages quote unquote which went in our channels.

Mr. Schwarz. Who gave you this message?.

Mr. Phillips. I do not remember.

Mr. Schwarz. You have no recollection whatsoever?

Mr. Phillips. Sir, it is five years ago, and there are
a lot of messages, and as I said, these were the ones that
I was the least interested in in the sense of being involved,
and so forth, and I just can't remember who handed it to me
or how it arrived.

Mr. Schwarz. Would you expect that there should be

another document which contains the eer message from

TOP SECR


Prone (Area 202} 544-6000 |

10

11

12

13

WARD & PAUL

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

22

235

24

4106 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

29

HW 50955 Docid: 32262005 Page 40

21.

IVF SECKE I
, . 140

Mr. Fenn. Yes.

Mr. Schwarz. Talking about telephones, incidentally,
was there a secure telephone between Washington and Santiago
which was used for messages, or did you use the cable always?

Mr. Phillips. We never used the telephone, unless it is
a personal message like your aunt died and you have to get on
the next plane for the funeral. Otherwise you use those
absolutely marvelous communications facilities that get it
down there --a flash cable will get there in 20 minutes.

In the recess I have been thinking about this, and I re-

alize that I have not been very helpful in what obviously is

a contradictory situation here. As I read it, either General
Bennett does not recall this, or else there was some sort of
endeavor within CIA headquarters to use his name. Is that
the approach we are making to this?

Mr. Schwarz. I don't think we are trying any approach.
He has denied any knowledge of this.

Senator Schweiker. We are just confused.

Mr. Phillips. Maybe I am confused, too.

Senator Schweiker. Can you enlighten us at all?

Mr. PHillips. If it were someone in CIA headquarters

saying, we are going to use Bennett's name without his

knowledge because it has a lot ‘of clout, I don't understand

ysaid, I am with you 100 percent, and from

TOP SECRET

iVPr SECKEI

8 141
3
pe i that moment began cooperating with the Chief of Station. I don'lt
o
g e recall any instance where there was any indication of hesitancy
F 5 on his part about doing what he was doing.
4

And I certainly can't comment about General Bennett's

5 side, not having been involved with him.

6 From the CIA side I suppose it is conceivable that some-
7 one is using that business that I referred to in dispatches,

8 General Bennett says, when they are really talking about

9 what a subordinate of General Bennett says, and they figure

10 he is acting for them, or something like that. I guess that

ll |} is conceivable.

12 But I would find it very unusual to see some sort of

13 |) little plot hatched here, because there was no need to.

WARD & PAUL

14 Mr. Schwarz. What you are saying is that you can't see
15 a motive?

16 Mr. Phillips. Precisely.

17 I can't see the motive for fooling,

18
19 ceived the instructions from the number two man in his Agency,
20 || which is indeed pretty high up.

el So, I am afraid the reasons that I am not being helpful

22 is that I, too, am confused.

25 Mr. Schwarz. I just received a note indicating that

24 Mr. Bolten of the Agency has told us that both of the October

410 First Street, 5.£., Washington, 0.C. 20003

25 14 cables were authored by you. I don't know if that adds

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docid: 32262005 Page 41

Phone (Area 202) 544-6000

LO
ll
12

13

WARD &@ PAUL

14

15

16

1?

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

25

iV SECKEI

143

Senator Schweiker. Let me ask counsel this.

Can we establish that Philpott did communicate ~-

Mr. Schwarz. Philpott is going to testify on Tuesday.
We have talked to him.He accepts at least one message. There
are two which purport to be signed by him, and he is not
sure if he accepted two. |

Senator Schweiker. So, he has accepted one message?

Mr. Schwarz. He accepted one message, yes.

Mr. Phillips. You wanted to ask about a meeting.

“Mr, Schwarz. It was a final meeting you had with Helms?

Mr. Phillips. Yes.

The death of General Schneider had occurred. And while,
as we said previously, things had fallen into place according
to “plan", an egregious plan, it. was absolutely my conviction
that those orders that I had been predicting, which were very,
very slim, were now completely unacceptable, one reason being

that the -inauguration was going to be in 48 hours -- not the

inauguration, but the confirmation, and so forth.

And so as I recall, there was a meeting of quite a few

of us, probably myself and fm Zio} and Mr. Broe and Mr.

Karamessines, and maybe Mr. Flannery, -~ no, I guess not, but

I do remember thatmeeting going up there and saying, if there

ever was a chance, it is now finished, and somebody has got to
say that it is finished. And so that is what I meant by that

meeting.

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docld: 32282005 Page 42

Phone (Area 202) 544-6060

10
il
12

13

#

WARD & PAUL

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
el
22
25

24

410 First Street, S-E., Wasnington, 0.C. 20003

29

1UP SECKEL

. 150
what happens, it is all right with me. There was an inlet insid
of Domingo which was dubbed, the Pasino,the: swimming pool,
and that is where Trujillo threw his friends and enemies
to the sharks. And he used to hang people on meat hooks in
refrigerated vaults. And it sometimes took them several days
to die. |

Miss Culbreth. You had served al

the Dominican Republic prior to the time that you served in

this position on the Track II party?

Mr. Phillips. I have, after the assassination of
Trujillo. But as a student of Latin America, I was very much
aware of this. So, there is another aspect of involvement.
U.S. policy has been to retreat from Trujillo.. We cut off our
arms aid, we brought our Ambassador out of there. So, while
those plans were going on we weren't "dealing with a friendly

nation", relations were very bad. .
Miss Culbreth. Let me ask you this. After General
| Schneider's death was his death characterized by you or by
| your colleagues in the CIA as having been an assassination? —
Mr. Phillips. It certainly was not. And I do not do
that now.
Miss Culbreth. You would not this day characterize
his death as having been an assassination?

Mr. Phillips. No. I think it was an accident that

occurred because he turned out te be such a brave man that

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 Docid: 32262005 Page 43


Phone {Area 202) 544-6000

10

11

12

13

WARD & PAUL

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

25

24

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, 0.C. 20003

zZ9

IVP SECRET
. 151

when he looked up and he saw a bunch of people standing
around his car he drew his gun.

Miss Culbreth. Thank you.

I would like to direct your attention to this cable
that you were questioned about. Tt is the one that is dated
September27, 1970. And Mr. Schwarz read from that cable in

talking with you earlier. This was the cable which said "A ~

- false flag base of staff would be established in Santiago by

10 October".
And you were questioned About’ this. part: “These
officers will perform the delicate chores with great flap

potential which cannot be done by station personnel or any

Chilean. An example: We have a eins an who can pose as
3 intelligence officer. If he approached, funded and

ran a Chilean general, any flap would be af

In the second paragraph which was not read earlier,
I would like to read this and then put a question to you:

“Headquarters believes this false flag base, manned by
officers who have repeatedly proved their ability to operate
and recruit under false colors, will give station great
flexibility in handling delicate and fast-moving situations
securely".

To me this second paragraph indicates that these false
flag officers were people that had experience in this very

kind of intelligence operations, is that correct?

TOP SECRET

HW 50955 DociId: 32262005 Page 44

1UP SECRET

3 152
3
= 1 Mr. Phillips. Every one of them was known to me per-
io)
2 z sonally and had worked for me.
F 5 Miss Culbreth. And had been in this kind of capacity
4 as a false flag officer?
5 Mr. Phillips. Yes.
6 Miss Culbreth. _ So,this was not some unique and unusual,

] devious approach or mechanism that was being employed in this

8 instance?

9 Mr. Phillips. The purpose of that explanation, es-
10 | pecially the second paragraph that you read, was -~- the imme-
11 |} diate reaction, as I recall, from the station when they first

12 || heard that we were given their assignment, was, come on,

13] that flap potential is great, it is not going to work, what

WARD & PAUL

14 are you talking about, this, that and the other.

15 As ai matter of fact, as I recall, @émeggice

fm! was terribly upset, because he is a sort of
i 17 |, an old pro, and he wanted to get into position, in other words,
18 | to plan for the future, and all of a sudden this new thing

19 || came in. The purpose of that cable was to explain to the

20 || station that we had been given this job to do and that we
2] || at headquarters saw that as the safest way for them to
22 || accomplish the job that they had been given with the least

23 | possibility of embarrassing the American Ambassador, and that

410 First Street, S.£., Washington, O.C. 20003

e4 | sort of thing.

25 Senator Schweiker. You said earlier, Mr. Phillips, I think

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page 45

iUP SECRET

3 156
$

g 1 in contact, but we didn't see it as such a sure thing; even
& e though this says, probably by General Viaux and so forthe

g 3 Miss Culbreth. Was there any question in your mind

4 as principal operating officer here in the states that there

5 was a delineation or a demarcation of function between the

6 Viaux group and the Valenzuela group, or did you regard them

7 as one big group down there accomplishing this, or did you really
8 regard them as separate groups?

9 Mr. Phillips. I very definitely regarded them as two

10 separate groups, always with the caveat that in Latin America

il some one always has a cousin who talks to someone else.

12 | But I very definitely regarded them as two separate groups,

13 and when General Viaux was called off earlier in October, I

WARD & PAUL

14 | thought that General Viaux was out of the thing, and I thought
15 that without support that he wasn't going to try anything.

16 And then we had the other group which seemed to be

17 more serious people, and with more capabilities. And I

18 very definitely regarded them as two separate groups.

19 Miss Culbreth. Let me ask just a few questions that

20 might sort of help us a little bit in our housekeeping opera-
el tions when we get to the point of trying to tie everything up
2a on these.

23 . With regard to the information that was given to you,

410 First Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003

24 the specific instructions on these cables that were sent to the

25 | Chief of Station and were directed tof¢olic

TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld: 32282005 Page 46

SHELBURNE: lync b TY ad SEC R ET

fls nash 1 159
o
2 1 Senator Hart of Michigan. Anyone else?
& Mr. Johnston. Mr. Phillips, just one last question. How
¢
2 _ large was the room you were operating out of? You described
3 3 . .
é
A it as a small windowless room.
5 Mr. Phillips. About from here to your wall back there --
6 no, not that big.
7 Mr. Johnston. This was the entire control area for the
Task Force?
8
5 Mr. Phillips. That is right.
Mr. Johnston. How many people were on the Task Force
10 .
besides you?
11. ;
3 7 Mr. Phillips. Of course we had two shifts of secretaries,
@ le
there was someone there all night, and that sort of thing.
z 13 >
3 ‘There were two or three secretaries, myself, Mr.
14
six, eight, something like that. -
15
Mr. Johnston. And that included the secretaries?
16
Mr. Phillips. Yes.
1? ;
Mr. Johnston. Wow many action officers were in the room?
18 ;
8 Mr. Phillips. It was pretty muchWme@mounzw@ovand myself,
& 19 .
g as the real action officers. And then there were two junior
¢ 20 .
3 , officers that were assisting at the time. I think I have given
A al
= Mr. O'Flaherty their names previously. So that was four. And
3 22
FA there was someone from the CIA shop, the Counterintelligence
5 23 .
& ship, whose name I can't remember today. So that is five
° 24
. officers that I recall. And I think that there was a 6th that
25 ,

‘TOP SECRET

HY 50955 Docld:32262005 Page 47


