ve MCS

Ne¢ TH (88
190 Titre 208
20 TFHwew UG

FAO, 22
JY NR 42) Thert 230

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 1


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 5010-106 .

MAY 198? EDITION * .

GSA GEN. REG, NO. 27 . 4

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ¥ j

Assoc. Dir.

Dep/A\ ares
Def. ADSI’.
Memorandum ae
Comp. Syst. 2
\. 4, : Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 6/2/75 Ext Affoies —
od | Tw co
j. From / Legal Counsef} , hone
- ; coe
Spec. Inv.
SUBJECT--SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE sul INFORMATIONS CONTAINED cone
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES HERES SSN elo
wget ee ALENT RIOR MEME DSE a DATE < BY Director Sec’'y —_

At 2:30 p.m. on June 2, 1975, a conference was held ier fs
with the Deputy Attorney General attended by K. William O'Connor,
Kevin Maroney, Philip White, and Robert McDermott of the Department. ~
Bureau representatives were Mr. Callahan, Mr. Adams, Mr. Wannall and mé.
\
Mr. O’Connor discussed the request by the Senate Select =
Committee for access to the 39 page report by former Assistant Attorney ~
General Petersen concerning COINTELPRO. Though objections were ,
presented by the Bureau representatives that the report should not be
furnished to the Committee, and its enclosures, particularly the legal 3
memoranda should not be made available, the Deputy Attorney General 9. *
hq
4d

.

ote

em”
decided and instructed that the 39 page report should be made available -
to John Elliff on Tuesday, June 3, 1975, for his review, at which time he 54; }- y
would be permitted to take notes, but he would not be furnished a copy of ”
the document. The Deputy further instructed that should Mr. Elliff reques
the attachments to the report, Mr. O'Connor should offer as an alternative
the .memoranda which initiated each REL COINTELPROs.
LOS RECO. 2. 03 ay
Upon our return to the Bureau, Mr.’ Adams rodeos tat ¥ 2
Intelligence Division undertake an analysis of each of the summaries which
were attached to the Petersen report in order to make a damage assessment
based on factors that would affect current Bureau operations should they be
revealed to the Committee. He also requested tat thiseinfermiation be
compiled and available to brief the Deputy Attorney General as to the
— difficulties that would be involved upon disclosure. ¥ JUN 10 y a

RD.

1 - Mr. Wannall — tt
1 - Mr. Cregar ao x
1 - Mr. David Ryan

1 - Mr. Hotis ;} 1
1 - Mr. Daly -
1 - Mr. Mintz G 4 ™~
JAM:mfd (8) |, ~ conTmVUED - ‘ovER
sere
i ae
qe 6a f£
8 4 JUN 4 8 1975 fia, GEEhO™
NW 4 Nie 37989588 Page 2


Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. That the Intelligence Division analyze the summaries
for purposes of a damage assessment.

2. That the Intelligence Division be prepared to furnish a
briefing to the Deputy Attorney General as to the damage assessment.

on GE

te

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 3

Fp-36 (Rey. 5-22-64) § >

FB!
Date: 5/28/75

.

(Type in plaintext or code)

REGISTERED MAIL |
(Priority) i

ransmit the following in

Director, FBI (62-116395)
(Attention: INTD - W. 0. Cregar)

SAC, Atlanta (62-2854)

{ “SENSTUDY 75

Re Bureau airtel to Atlanta 5/23/75.

Material enclosed with referenced airtel was hand-
delivered to former SA, ALAN G. SENTINELLA, 5/27/75, and same
was returned by SENTINELLA to Atlanta Division same day.

Enclosed is the material furnished by SENTINELLA.

ALL} NFORMATION CONTAINED
ial = at

DATE
yl
o

ud

yd fii 73 - SB

: pBEC-1 00 WRT Catalans bend oman
Bureau (Efic.) ;
~Atlanta a7 JUN 16 1975
WKD:rvrl

(3) —

Appa SIS —soocial Agen In Chage Sent _. SM Per —____ ess
Special Agent in Charge U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574
} aval bd 1d:32989588 Page 4 a ;


Assoc, Dir. +f
4 Dep-A.D-Adm.on |
§ Dep.-A.D.-Inv—are |
{ Asst. Dir.: ;
§ Admin,
# Comp. Syst,
¢ Ioxt. Affairs —_

an | b
FEDERAL BUPEAL Ot IOASTINATIO'G /

COMMU CATIONS SLoTiOn

\F B11 NK CODE

HB iG j Biles & Com, —
("4s O0PM 6/5/75 IMMED TATE RXG eee
Seneca pei “5 7 a on
TO _DIRECTOR (626 116395) PSE ET

“ATT: W. 0. GREGAR, INTD
FROM NEWARK (62-3971)
(Gensrovy 2B

Telephone Ru. _.
& Director Sec’y __

RE TELCON BUREAU SUPERVISOR ROBERT SHEA AND ASAC HERBERT D.
CLOUGH, JR., JUNE 5, 1975.
THOROUGH REVIEW OF FILES CaPTIONED “DISRUPTION OF DEMO-
GapTe
CRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION; INFORMATION CONCERNING"; "SPECIAL
SQUAD AT DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION , ATLANTIC CITY, NJ.
AUGUST 2228, 1964"; “DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION, AUGUST

24-28, 1964" AND JUNE FILES DOES NOT REVEAL ANY MEMORANDA, ~
LETTERS OR OTHER TYPE COMMUNICATIONS PREPARED BY FORMER

Wak!

END here LLY: op “SIAM Yo y

Myw FBI WASH DC CLR

SPECIAL AGENT, LEO T. CLARK. A JMOORMATION COTE y Wadd

REC Iuy
A My 3997
we iki nas TOTe

cCc- Cees
ni atool Hobid. 3863580 Page 5

ee eee |

2-Mr. S. F. Phillips
June 3, 1975

O

ORAL INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE SENATE
SELECT COMMITTEE INVESTIGATING
4 * ~—-FNTEDCIGHICE ACTIVITIES

1. SUBJECT: Martin Luther King, Jr.
Stanley David Levison

2. WITNESS' ORGANIZATION: Retired SA, FBI

3. FILE REFERENCE NO.: Bureau file 62-116395

4, DATE OF INTERVIEW: 5/12/75

5. INTERVIEWER: Mr. Lester B. Seidel, SSC Staff Member

6. CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION: Unclassified

7. SUMMARY OF CONTENT:

Witness was questioned and furnished information

concerning the former FBI investigations of Martin Luther

King, Jr., and Stanley David Levison.

8. RELATION To INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS: None.

: pre LLINEORMATION CONTAINED,
rio GK HER RENIS BS possi IFIE
DATE Sar an

62-116395

NOTE: Original via liaison to Central oats Index in
connection with Senstudy 75.

Assoc. Dir. ——
Dep. AD Adm. —

pee. AD inv. — - 4 LL
“i Ww V
Comp. Syst. —— ,
Ext. Affairs —__ (a oy,
Files & Com, — R fr
ee Cag ( 27)
Inspection “ worn
= A-HLG4: Of
Plan. & Eval _ RICE EST ROE
Spec. Inv.
cu: 17 JUN 16 1979

Telephone Rm. —
Director See'y is ROOM[_] ‘TELETYPE UNIT (__]
|

| Biv ed Bangs i 588: Page 6

Daal wae? GPO : 1975 © - 569-920


x * . . ,
fa a 7 . . : » |
we OR . . . : Y
e at . . .
. ~ _ a -_

THE’ DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

Nag
“ WASHINGTON, D. C. 2osp8 . .
_ eri 75-2190
intelligence Community Staff : . 10 June 1975 —

t
* !

a . mw j
4

8 : 7 I ras Y
7 . MEMORANDUM FOR: Members of susiBrad Hoé Coordinatingy ~~
: One Nmap e OF ENS Bee Coord

t

- SUBJECT. . + + Security Clearances

‘Attached is an updated listing of staff personnel certified

; ‘by the Staff DirectoL/Senate Select Committee as meeting the

requirements of Executive Order 10450 for access to classified

a information “P to and including TOP ‘SECRET. Some of these
. individuals have been certified as meeting the requirements of
DCID 1/14 and have been provided the appropriate briefing.
ect het,
John M. Clarke ‘1

Associate Deputy to the DCI
for the Intelligence Community

17 JUN 16 1975, Oo

Rwhodbll tb dutgrposse Page 7 ; ; ; _ |

ae

, @iaser, wintiara ’

‘+ " ‘Baron,’ Frederick:

t,
\
pou
y
1

“.. Name
". Aaron, David |
- “Bayly, John

Banoff, Ba rbara a

' Barkey, Howard ”

" Benz, Charity I:

‘Birdsell, Wayne

Qorschara, Samuel! t

Brissett, Belva ~ a :

- Brooks, Nancy

"het Carter,’ Barry

; Che snick,’ Barbara

Nw baz96. “Doel: s2a95¢e Page

Brown, C. Harold. .— :

Carpenter, Margaret’

IC STAPF VE RIVICA TION OF CLEARANCE i

Compartmented
Clearance

. Designated: Briefed
on (SE, TK, B)-

LB 4/15

Seas ree ae
3 : ss

7223-46 8
“) 3212024 /

| “2 2ea4-d0 “Ky
are 66-38 0
2 BBQ
oR ap2d. a
ne cla St CE 4c dBe46 |

Date and

. Sey

we 8-21-38 - HL f°

fete 20-48", “Gale.

ee 1-26-17 aoe.

8.2-06 -

6-23-41. Ok. A:

12-14-42 |

Place of Birth. .

(831 ce Qe hs. 30- 3377,

"126.44 4 Be: 1a : 578- 60-2305%

: ‘Conn,

8-27-44. 1 Cale
JCal.

y 2 5 ce

Social.

w

550- add ion

s,

"S
a

a si. -68- 91231
“490- ol- 6758?
dot. 54. 5241

,053- 38- 7410!

é 518 03- 1841

067. 18- 32925

3, 440- 44. esas

33- -38- e773:

555- 62- 61295

pe 567- 56- ~dsed

| Security No, -”

vio. oe 4?

‘
>

2

EE

rose

278- -34.- “3428, a

-10 JUN 1975”

Staff Members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities . who have ‘redeived a security
_ investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation within the past five years and‘are certified ap |
meeting requirements of EO 10450 for access to classified information up to and including TOP SECRET.

|
. oe - e . ol Da.

Fcianin? Y
* heme

SS
abt

qsuRE-

aaa sc!


‘ é oe Jun 75°

Compartmented _ of i ; OF
yt Clearance oo ‘Date and , _& 2Secialh 2 4
ne Desigmated Briefed '__- Place of Birth. 28 Security No: F :
ve . BL TK,B) | i: ee ae

.

Name

‘94230-9155 E

a Davis, :Lynn - a

6 'B 41 17 (port) 9- 6 43 oes ae

ane 60- 1688

f

“ : Dawson,”.Thomas *

oy ‘Dawson,. Rhett.” Ss1c3e- 43 29
. Brcreo, Mary 7 81.
_ Dillon, Molly
- Doolittle ? Patricia ;
7 - Daren Daniel.’ 7 ce
a * waite, ‘John _

. a “F

" Epstein, Michael | Payor * 3-10-37 a Mass.-;

bgede 2988"

Erné, Joan a 8-30-46 _ _ Dc be an

- @: Rn Cena a 7
| enn, Peter. LT pee “B 4/24 ee ‘12- 12-47." Ma
Sa te, ‘ at cea ble dation m fae hips iro Mag tet “fiat in ih amehe signe + a hata

cB 5/28. "3. 7-46 . Ala. got, 420- 60- 8767

zk “50- 1123"

Gitenstein, ‘Mark : Hemsy

-! Greissing, Edward - : a 11-27-50 “Germany,” “poe goari3

Harrigan, Arthur. 2 BS/IG “3l16-44 | o NY!

Hatry, ‘Audréy Helen :,": ne BS/I9 ND, 6-10-23 Md, ?

Inderfurth, Mark K, ee oe 29 ~46. “NG ey Badge S
sergon, Boxtie a: a6 2a. : Ce 3
chai verso "Boat: J SoH Page é. 10 22-50... | ‘Ww. va. o “


7 : oa
u ab

. . ny . + - ‘ ~
. So:

poy Compartmented  “ oe o4 of be “ao JUN 875
“Fels iets. .  Glearance noe, Date and © i ~ ‘E ‘Social | ‘ at : Ah
mo Designated Briefed - _~ Place of Birth "Security No. an a

see , (8, TK, B) winks re, i a nn ee:

Name
avame

“"" Johnson, ‘Dorothy’ 24 648-25

“'” Johnson, Loch. B 4/ 29°). pas 2-21-42
2 . Karalekas, Anne
“gq Robert |

. os . . . *
., Kieves,. Lawrence

25.2 ~12-51 12

-  Kirbow, Charles,’ B 4/24 10-2~22 i E
* LaVoy, Diane B 6/10 11-10-48 i _adseto-3i 3119 e 9
a Liebengood, Howard - | "2-29-42. tm * | : 307-44- sjore. .
oe émbard, Charles "6.2030 1 Frange." 4 sia. oii
1 . lek ; Wt ve a _
0 Lynch, Mary 3-16-26 - Wy Van! i fas 50-38- 1344 pk,

we piacDonald, Naldeen © 10-19-81. Bragdl . g 228- 78 -2708; mo

wi i

~

“Madigan, Michael James. th 4-18-43 DC 042- 34. 3790 7

“7 2486 ONY gn

Marshall, Benjamin on “ : "54-19 mo NE # 465- _28- 4503. : - “
on Mazen Burke a “yoete22 NI ew sbi ey ey
¥ *

Maxwell, Elliot ‘Everett Ubu 133- 34 4228 a

- Mechem,. Martha. Beane: AES ce a 2- i140. ale 598-48- ade. _

sere 88296 “Deelarjzasgsi Page: 16.


Miller, William-G:“
"Monaco, Patricia i ©,

no Moore, Janet”

I} .- Orloff, Jan 6

r Owens, Drena
4 +) . re!

' Peterson, John F.!

ao? Pitts, Susan
, “Pyle, Christopher ;
: ‘ ’ Quatibeck, Elton | a
. | Wricxs, Walter :

7 Romberg, Alan oe :
Bot “Rowe, James”

oe Schneider, Ruth”

woke . coe +
° a aoe

{NW i a8796; Dodie: s29aasee: ‘Page a

|
|

HK Do visherty, NY ames:Daniel

‘Schwarz, . Frederick'A, Oo. Ut : a

Compartmented
_ Clearance

a, Designated Briefed _
Loot - (SI, TK, TR, B)

bbl
fea.
eS
i

ra
=
as
wo
Ni
an

Social

Security Nos Sa

Date and
Place of Birth

Le Ber gt helt yea

2 BAS es an NY. 8 19-26-4349 Spe

~1%g35). NT” 187; 26- 8100 :

1B 5/23 2

on a ‘Towa * aba. 52- 9820 ; Po

2 B'B/2B
i442 ne 23962-8295 :

11-14-47. Cal. . 558+ 74-8394

‘128-42 NG) : 242-68-3271 j 4 :

© 15:41 : cal : 56556-7707 Pe -

B6/1G en, 102 24-53 * Gained) - o20-40- 76388 8
. . | in 28-39" Massa Ja 019-3 0- 9898 : : .
BB/IG 2006 8418226 . N.Dak, i 501- 14. a504 ff .

/ 12s 27-46 -' Gay 24 74. i308!

1672 30- 8583 5

*

519 62- ang:

“OB 4/2). 08 12-1038 NY

BSG 66-51. DE Ge

'B5/23'..° 10-31-44 Conny ob8- 32 018:

ve BA/BS 4220438 NY 084 30-2047; a pat


Name

Seidel, Lester. |

" |, Sheer Patrick

* :  Shelbur My Frank *

‘ en. Elizabeth?

Bot " Smith, “John L.

Smith, Stephanie oa

. ‘smothers, ‘Curtis .

'. Talley, Martha’ |

Thoben, Florence. “

= Thomas, Robert G a
: Towell, Mary :

.. Treverton, Gregory |

Aa Trueheart, Wittiam :

if ~._ Snider, Lewis Brittle.
BLE wigs

Compartmented
Clearance

_ Hesignates Briefed -
_ GL TK, KB).

Date and

Place of Birth . ° Security No. ae: —

US aewe-25
een
-1eat-aT
Soy alae.
og 24-47 4

ales 20-40.

“7 NG
NG 3

_, ind a

“e “Me 3,
a oe we
Py . ¢
* * vad
D mt a
ann o. . “s
>
°

“3

‘Social |

Bo.
.
mt ~

216- 38- 5204

Set 64 1965,
a38- 24 -6934

076. 42- 0199

a 400- 52 58003

a 58- 6476"

a

£26, 72 0956"

245i 88- i368

*,

30 1Z- i957:

Zi9- 14- 5186!

524 622 24593

as. 20- ea

»
2

a

¥

20-38- 98692

; 56-64 7628: ee

1h9- 36- “29992 ot

25-50-9983) ©

4 Q JUN 175.

Bade h ane

ve


- |. :  Gompartmented , an a * -10 JUN 1975
co Pe, Clearance co. - Dateand. | - "+ :Social . ‘
‘Name _ ‘+: ..) Designated Briefed  ~ Place of Birth . | SecurityNo,. © < | 9 4
Se a _(SL.TK, By a

a

=

etn sen mene enrennns wy on RARER

Srecl peau ee

"6. 14-41.

oO Balt. “11 1$9230-1936 ©: TF Badge ~

Wiik, Carol Ann . -B5/ 23

"f.

: -Wilson, Otis -

wo, BS/LO

@ vscecns, Pe Peter Brown,” . 22760-1093. oo

p 2p 54-1724


®

L- 3D, W. Moore
(Attn: J.M. Murphy)

? . iL - de Ae Mintz
- (Attn: Legal Analysis

Section)
o _ 1l-W. R. Wannall
~~ May 9, 1975
omnes, - 4 .
Lo cll, - 787 SN
Honorable chastee-B.. vigeine _w¥- WW, 0. Cregar

House of Representatives—————— 1. - R. W. Held

Washington, D. C. 20515 aa
Af rede Fe oat
Dear Congressman Wiggins: ‘| ' | / roof d a

199 Reference is made to your Letter dated April 9,
739
California condemning the’ Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) for placing an informant on the staff of a legal
service agency to commmicate information learned in that
capaci ity to the FBI and our response dated April 28, 19795.

Contact with the State Bar
enabled us to identify the situation
referring .

of California has
to which they were
i

Assoc. Dir,
op. AD Adm, —
Dep. AD Inv.

Asst, Dirs

Admin.

Cemp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs
Files & Can.

LeSeratory cn cm
Plan & Evah

Poo Seety

AWNAT BOF

NW 68296 Docld32989588 Page 14

: cooperating with the PBI.
' Spot WOLACG contacted the Ver

Or
he wanted to assure the FEI Age WOE:
fo a vf

ered

© mee

- Betiveen Avril, 1968, and November, 1968, one
Rudolph Leaner Muse was ’ operated as an informant by our

New Ocleans, Louisiana, Division. Muse fornished information

regarding black extremist activities and he was paid for
services rendered. Muse was bpnomoloyed when initially
volunteering his assistance to the FBI and subsequently, on
May 10, 1966, began working as an investigator for the

New Orleans Legal Assistance Corps (IOLAC), an organization
funded by the Office of Economic Opportunity. —

Information in the files of our Hew Orleans Division
indicates during June, 1968, Muse advised it had becone
necessary to belt his supervisor at NOLAC of his relationsht ip
with the FBI. His supervisor became avare of Muse's. asscc-
jation with black nationelist groups and at tteanted bo- discharge
him. To avoid discharge, Mase told his supervisor he vas

eans rf son and; advised

cfs $9) aay 16
RWHtcan (8) vA / fas cone noms one Hate 1975, * hy
—- Se :
¢. fPRk Deore 5 rye
ays San li OER REN STIONCONTAINED °° gyi \ nk ge
AAT, He A ir Wi ») Q . oe t _ 7107S - 569-971

enclosing a resolution adopted by the State Bar of >

/
Subsequently Muse's supervisor an


Honorable Charles E. Wiggins

Muse and the FBI would be maintained by him and would go
no further. Muse's supervisor said he was cognizant of
the importance of Muse's cooperation with the FBI remaining
confidential.

. The New Orleans Division of the FBI never ; _
conducted any investigation regarding NOLAC and Muse a ri
never furnished information concerning its activities. -

EZ hope this information will clarify the issue
for you. If I may be of further assistance in this matter;
please contact me.

A copy of this letter is being provided to the.
State Bar of California.

Sincerely yours,
i C.M, Kelley
Clarence M. Kelley
Director

- 601 McAllister Street

a q
1 = State Bar of California -
:

Sen Franciseo, California oh0 |

i]

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 15

Honorable Charles E, Wiggins

NOTE:

The resolution of the State Bar of California (SBC)
referred to above did not identify the specific incident in
which they were interested so Congressman Wiggins! letter was
acknowledged and we indicated additional details would follow.
On 4/25/75 San Francisco advised the basis for the SBC resolution
was articles contained in the 2/7/75 issues of the San Francisco
Examiner and Oakland Tribune. In these articles Muse was not
mentioned by name but the details corresponded with his case.

On 4/28/75 Supervisor Ernest Well, New Orleans, advised Muse °
was identified by name in articles concerning this incident
in the 2/2/75 issue of the New Orleans Times Picayune and the
2/25/75 issue’ of the New Orleans States Item. Since Muse

- revealed his relationship with the FBI and has been publicly

identified by name and appears to be no privacy issue or néed

‘to protect the confidentiality of our files, Congresswan Wiggins

should be advised.of the complete details in this matter. As?
the SBC urged issues such as this be considered by the select
committees of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, a
copy of this communication is being furnished for the information
of the Legal Analysis Section and Project Senstudy 75 in

Division 5. .

| NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 16

q
5]

+ MAY 1962 EDITION

a = = = p

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 . 5010106 4 :
. i a

coy GEN, 2G. AOL 27 i

UNITED STATES cogent - é coe ET Aewe ee
Dep A! iH oo
; 1- Mr. Adams Asst. Din:
> Memorandum } Mr. Adam Sen
i- Mr. Hotis Ext. Affalrs
tro: Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 5-8-75 Flas b Cons —
. 1 -” Mr. Daly 5 Ident. ~
; Inspection ___
. Legal Comset ff Intell.
FROM ss:
: ip
3 Plan. & Eval.
SUBJECT: ‘STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL ; Spoe. Inv.

COMMITTEE REQUESTS Tolophone as —
. Director See’y —.
The purpose of this memorandum isto set forthin. .....,
summary form the requests we have received from various Committees
in Congress and the status of our replies. i |

a
I. Q onate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities (SSC).

. We have substantially complied with the request of this
Committee contained in their letter of 3-19-75. The remaining aspects
of this request involve a decision by the State Department concerning
the release of exhibits contained in a study on FBI jurisdiction, a decision
by the Department relating to COINTELPRO and our recommendation
that one particular document not be furnished the Committee.

We are in receipt of a request by memorandum dated
4-30-75 from the SSC. This request generally relates to Sections
of the Manual of Rules and Regulations and the Manual of Instructions,
and the various divisions having responsibilities and interest in the
Sections requested, are in the process of preparing the necessary responses. ;

—f7/

2)

We received a request by letter dated 4-28-75 from the
Committee concerning allegations of our possible involvement in the removal N
of documents from the residence of the late Director J. Edgar Hoover.
Our response has been prepared and it is anticipated it will be furnished
the Department in the near future. 6 QA- WG BIS g- -

seer NO Tereheie” REP
170 JUN 3 1975
® MAY 23 1975
We have complied with those aspects of the the request “=>
contained in this Committee's letter of 4-10-75, pertaining to photographic
“ surveillance and indexing procedures. We anticipate our response to
their requests relating to our authority to collect, retain and disseminate
information will be furnished in the immediate future. bite
ee

I. Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights
of the House Judiciary Committee

ORIGINAL FLEDIN 2. 9

‘ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

: oe Y HERE! NAS Hp gppest SIFI |
- SBativadte PAT 5 Say. CONTINUED - OVER
oe

\ n

4 .
| NW'88296. Docid:32989588 Page 17” . : : -


ee a a a a?

<A e Nomen eisai chineinutetiedinte tabetha Eee iach nowaltnhab mined WLS Diesels mhtirini MAR Aaitatimelet netdrin tm identi AEA elie sriaelalesthwhesieh aie lial- atten Avie athe a A ah oD ee

|

«

“7a

*

a1 Counsel @ B. Adams Memorandum é
Re; Status of Responses to Congressional
Committee Requests

We also received a request from this Committee by
etter dated 4-22-75, relating to our procedures of handling Free

, of Information Act requests and an inquiry by letter dated 4-25-75

\pegarding our alleged involvement in the removal of documents

|$rom the residence of the late Director J. Edgar Hoover. We have

jprepared responses to both requests. The response concerning the

| Freedom of Information Act has been furnished the Department for
approval and furnishing to the Committee;'the response relating to 1

removal of documents has been prepared and is in the process of
being approved by the Bureau. | |

Hi. Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security
of the Senate Judiciary Committee

We received a request by letter dated 4-28-75 for
information relating to terrorist incidents. We have prepared and
furnished a response to this request.

RECOMMENDATION:

None. For information.

eT ae

Qe

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 18 . ee

"

‘ATTENDEES

_USIB AD HOC COORDINATING GROUP
ON CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW

Wednesday, 4 June 1975, at 1000 hours
. DCI Conference Room (7D64 }

Dr. John M. Clarke
AD/DCI/IC

Mr. J. J. Hitchcock
State :

_Mr. David Lowman
’ NSA

Mr: J. Foster Collins
" Treasury

Mr.
FBI

Leon F. Schwartz

Mr: Robert Upchuren
ERDA-

_RADM Donald P. Harvey, USN

Myr. John Brock
DIA

Captain L. C. Martinez
Navy

* ALL FET TNFORMA TION
RG. Ge

. NW 882796 Doctd:32989588 Page 19

Captain William | Quisenberry

*

Lt. Col. Harold Coyle

Rep. for Deputy Under.
Secretary of the Air Force

‘Mr. Walter’ Elder -
CIA: oe
Mrs.

: 168

,

Mr. Donald E. Moore

Chairman, USIB Security

"Committee
. 4

_~ Army

. Colonel Jerry
- Air Force

CONTAINED

2 MeB9S- 7.

WoLbe ts

Harriett D. Mowitt
Exec Sec to the Ad Hoe Group

Mr. Merrilli-T. Kelly

D. Alderson,


. ~*
fg) woe. kt
i i

© ‘conriventa ©

.- DCI/IC~75- 0608
: 6 June 1975 —
; * ree .
mpi oeonl ao) >)
MEMORANDUM FOR: prifictpes—of-the-usi-td Hoe Coordinating
’ _ ’ Group . . ;

SUBJECT _: Ninth Meeting, 4 June 1975

t. . . to . : :

- od. A meeting of the USIB Ad Hoc Coordinating Group’
‘was held on. 4 June 1975 at 10: 00 a.m. A list. of attendees
is attached. ; :

* 2. The meeting was opened by Dr. Clarke who described’
the current activities of the Senate Select Committee in~-
aceelerating their official interviews with knowledgeable-
officials across the Community and the criticality of firming
up agreements on how these interviews are to be handled.
_ This has not been forthcoming despite White House interest.
House Select Committee procedure is not yet clear.

3. . The second item raised by the Chairman was the
dist of category II “abuses" which-had been developed at
_ the direction of the Policy Steering Group. The set* developed
‘was the result of discussions with Mr. Schwargz, Counsel .to
the Senate Select Committee, who plans to present a complete
-list of "category II" items to the Committee on Friday, 6 .
' June. At that point, it is expected "notices" would go out ~
to'the Community agencies advising them so that agreed °
interview procedures will apply. It is also anticipated
‘that the presence of private as well as Agency counsel will
. -be addressed. The Policy Steering Group has accepted the
aircon prdnciple: OF : dealing: with :these .ddentified "category.-TI". 4.4: petites
° subjects by assigning responsibility for gathering % Al IG 36 —
_ comprehensive ‘and paper preparation. to specifie ind? ua — “y
“within the Commuriity dgéenéies. Clarke‘ is “the” Poor Sse
point for gathering the names of individuals who will ass
a vey bhesSe: pesponsibilities.. To. date. individuals had. been aa 10,175,
nee for all: subjects except those to be handled Py CIA. .

| ee
th hee eS sates tat, Ut 8 OF af Pax of wee ts 58

ae wb nighties dyttt, wage ete de as ag ee sens

—- a. EXEMPT FROM GENERAL DECLASSIFATION ATION
SCULDULE OFLE. O. 186525 EXEMPTION CATECURY:
-§ SBODA(2}, (3) or (4) (curele ane or more)

—————— |
i
i
a , (9 AUTOMATICALLY DECLASSIFICD ON
CONFIDENTIAL Impossible to Determine |

(ualess impossitle, inert date or esenty

Agi 4 7 1915

Docid:32989588° Page 2

nr ne Seen eno

“8 © coneipenTiaL

ge
i
i
\
h
:
t
a

Tr EES SP

A, “In addition to the "eategory II" items, there are

a number of additional subjects largely geographic in nature
for which the DCI feels CIA should assume responsibility
for preparing comprehensive papers. In view of the
apparent adversary relationship between the Senate Select
Committee Staff and the agencies under investigation, it may
be that preparation of papers dealing comprehensively with

- specific subjects will deflect some of this cross-agency
probing and result in a positive solution to problems before
they arise.

5. The Chairman reminded the group of the responsibility
- which exists to keep Mr. Cotter of the Post Office Department
informed on matters resulting from the Congressional investiga-
tions which will clearly impact on his agency's affairs. At
present, the cross-agency character of .the interviews now
under way indicate a possible communication BaP in adequately
coordinating on postal matters.
| 7 6. - The Chairman explained the DCI's action taken in
late May to separate the responsibility for CIA's response
»  . tu the Congressional Select Committees from those responsi-
‘ pilities of the IC Staff. Both Dr. Clarke and Mr: Elder
. emphasized the very close relationship which exists in the
. two efforts. Mr. Elder will nepresent CIA at all USIB Ad
Hoc sessions henceforth.

T. The Chairman questioned Mr. Elder, the CIA repre-
sentative, whether or not the Senate Select Committee had
yet furnished the Agency with a list of subjects with which
they plan to deal in depth. Mr. Elder reported they have
not yet done so, but it is apparent that three items are of
‘priority interest at the moment: assassinations, the Phoenix
program, and covert action; that -it appears clear the Committee
is currently pursuing the question of authorities, approvals,
and support from other agencies.

8. The 27 May request addressed to the DCI covering ; ;
‘Watertals: undér the jurisdiction “of a‘rikmber” Of * Commute ty (ov ek ese
+. agencies was provided. to.the members of the Ad Hoe Group. a
:..,Dr,, Clarke indicated he was. seeking policy guidance. on...

selected items in the request which dealt with Community
| product such as NIE ete. He noted the 27 May request indicated
war's Identical: letters were being forwarded to-the Secretary: of -

“..° State and the Secretary of Defense. Copies have been sent
fyovite.. 6O.a1L.USIB: »Ad:-Hoc .members.,. ‘the..NSC “andthe. White.-House.:torye. grt te a hs

este es nhs

ia

596 ‘De 2
NW 88296 ‘Docid:32989588 "Page 2100 AAMPIDONMTIA!


_ NW 88296 Docld:32989588. Page 22

O27 @ © CONEIDENTIAL @

9. Copies of a memorandum which set forth the action
items resulting from the Policy Steering Group session of
last week were provided.to the Ad Hoe members for their
information. .

10. Mr. Elder reported that the House Committee has

indicated to CIA its intent to concentrate on specific

issues, but as of now are not adequately organized to be
specific in their requests. The one extant request forwarded
to the CIA was posing some problems because of the lack of
cleared personnel, approved storage facilities, and determina~
-tions on the ultimate disposition of records.. The Chairman
noted that concurrent with this meeting, a meeting of Community
jlegal representatives was taking place with the purpose of
commenting on the House Select Committee's proposed security
‘regulations which have not yet been adopted. .

; 11. CIA reported its success with the provision of a
reading room for SSC Staff at CIA headquarters. State
reported there were no comparable facilities anticipated
there. Defense has provided badges to Staff members and .
reading facilities are available. The same accessability of
materials is true at NSA and FBI. °

. 22. The last subject’ on the agenda was the implementa-
- tion of the Community Central Index. In the material provided
’ to the group was a letter reaffirming the purposes of the
’ Central Index and a list of 40 key words to be used in .
identifying material furnished the Index. A printout of the

Index content was provided to the group as a review document’

only. The final format of such periodic reports nase not yet
' been.refined. Group members are encouraged to comment if

they detect any problems with items in the printout. Forms

. for inputting information to the Central Index were also

\ provided to the Group. This is a service of common concern

\ which will assure the uniformity of information received and .
‘should serve to lighten the workload of the individual
\agencies. The telephone number of Mrs. Young of the Central
_\Index was provided for agencies' convenience in accessing

the Index information, ..., ane oe
_ Harriett i Mowitt

Executive Secretary

‘Attachment: as stated

Q rem A we


THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

ntelligence Community Staff

(Sats ie 95

y/ . SO . . " WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505
intelli i S. .

“DCI/IC-75-0116
-. 6 June 1975 ,

l. The following 1 list includes subjects to be covered by

the Agencies concerned:

/- . Assassinations White House
; Drug Abuse _ CIA. .
: Political Abuses
(1964) FBI
’ Domestic a ; Justice
Surveillance _
, - Electronic , , ” Justice

’ Surveillance and
Warrantless Wiretap

, “Use of Notional
. Organizations . FBI

' Use of Proprietary
Organizations CIA

Mail Cover and De,
‘Intercept . - Justice

"T'Watch List ‘DoD

ee en 2s, MgB IST. ye

_ Army Surveillance DoD ©

BA JUN 13 1875.

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 23

, Mr. Wilderotter

IDS 145-7094

‘Not yet des ignated

.. John Thomas
324-4609

John Martin

. IDS 187-4555

George Calhoun
IDS 187-4401

John Thomas

_ 324-4609

Not yet designated

_ Phil White“ A ip
. IDs 187-4674 VEG ~/

ot CONTAINED
MEMORANDUM FC FOR: See Disteibition eee nc co ;

aia
\\e

Benson Buffham, NSA

688-7222

_Dr. (2: Cooke


te oo . . @ . . i - . ‘
, 4 . a

The individuals named on this list are those designated by the
Agencies as having prime responsibility for preparing the paper.
The papers should be delivered in two copies directly to the
Associate Counsel to the President, Mr. James Wilderotter,
Room 182, Old Executive Office Building, by the Agencies.
In the course of the next week, a meeting will be called for
Mr. Wilderotter to meet with the individuals designated on this
list. Each Agency will also be responsible for naming a person
_ to work with each Task Force leader where it is appropriate to
the subject matter. In the interim, Task Force leaders should
deal directly with the following people with respect to individual
‘Agency responsibilities: .

DCI/Intelligence Community John Clarke
i ee IDS 143-5477
CIA oe | SE) -Henry Knoche 7

~ ot _ IDS 143-4086.

Defense "os Pom Latimer
, . IDS 11-54221

“State -- . .fWilliam Hyland
a IDS 101-20342

Treasury a William Morell —
IDS 184-2536

Justice a 7 fwittiam O'Connor _
— ; IDS 187-5211
‘FBI - or , . <2 Ewilliam Cregar
. . IDS 175- 4636

The CIA ha's been. coordinating internally the DCI's

letter ral the Chairman of the House Select Committee on Intelligence
and this letter should be available for Community review and
consideration soon. Distribution of this letter will be made sometime
prior to a meeting of the General Counsels chaired by Mr. Wildeérotter
to go over details of the letter and coordinate on the final language.
_This arrangement is consistent with. agreements reached -in.our
meeting on 3 June 1975. oes

John M. Clarke
“Associate Deputy to the DCI

NW 88296 Docld:82988588 Magel24n for the Intelligence Community


“Distribution:
1 - Mr. Wilderotter
2+ Mr. Latimer
“+44 Mr. Hyland
“1+ Mr. Morell
‘+ Mr. O'Connor
Y1- Mr. Cregar
‘1 - Mr, Knoche :
A - Mrs. Mowitt/Executive Secretary of { Steering Group aps 143 - 4085)

NW 88296 Doecld: 32989588 Page 25

_ GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY PLAZA
ATLANTA, GEORGIA

t
e-
é

aan PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
a
te

i. NW 88296 Doctd: 32989588 Page 26

yee Stes + a

Special Agent Seymor Phillips
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D.C.

a |

%

y
Me

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams
1 - Mr. J. A. Mintz
1 - Me. W. R. Wannall
to } The Attorney General lay 22, 1975
\ : 1 - Mr. J. G. Deegan
\ / Director, FLT 1 - Mr, R. L, Shackelford
1 - Mr. W. O, Cregar
‘ 1 - Me, S. F. . Phillips
U. S. SETS SLLNCT CocMITEE To
STUDY GOVERNEUTAL OPTICS WITH
RESPLCT TO TYELLLIGCICE ACTIvIrrEes

Counsel ta the Frasident.

Daclosures - 2

62-116395

L - 67-432832 (Personnel File Former SA Alan G. Sentineila)

Eaeclosea for your information is the original of
Q pokorancum concerning an interview by a
captioned Committee of retired FBI Special
Sentinelila,.

Statt Mamber of
ésent Alan G.

A eapy of tha momeranium is also enclosed
for fori, arain:s to ie, James a.

Wilderotter, Associate

1 - 100-106670 (Martin Luther King, Jr.)
1 - 100-392452 (Stanley David Levison)

— <p Fe fee by ew

Agsoc. Dir,
Dep, AD Adm. _
Dep. AD inv. __.

Asst, Dir.:

Admin.
Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com.
Gen. Inv.
Ident,

Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory
Plan. & Eval. ‘
Spec. Inv. 4 4
Training ]
Legal Coun, 7 :
Telephone Rm. _.

Director Sec’y

n& dad decid:

i ES ee LF

ere Gocten. —Ufs2/-ze fELB

ALL INFORMATION sontanes
J HEREIN 1S Ld
ae eda BY

Lave

B00 f TELETYPE UNIT [__]
} 588 Page 2f

REG. 73
Reig)

5 algae ,

ed JUN 16 1975.-

: y y
beng ae

=r,

ney

ob é {5 fe

fe hd a ‘Cire OB
n>)

LO?

*

OPY AND COPY OF ENGL FILED IN

J

s

INREC C

Ov

UL [Mb 3Zs - 28E

GPO 934-345

a ", = = eo
,
' .
* »
. a te .

» ef O®
1 - Me. J. B. Adams
1 - Mr. J. A, Mintz
1 - Me. W. R. Wannall
1 - Mr. J. G. Deegan
62-116395 May 22, 1973
& 1 - Mr. R. L. Shackelford
ee i. 1 - Me. W. 0. Cregar
RS of Uyé, SHINEE shiner cose TT 1 by tetas
< CY SHUDY COVERMIETTAL OPERATIONS UT Be Do BATES EDS
SN)
Ste SSPROT TO IITELLIGESCE ACTIVITIES (ssc).

cS RS 2 AR: TUCEAVIN? oF ADYIAEN FBT

yr SPECIAL Li (s4) By ssc

STARR TES

Set out belo is the verbatin text of a statenent
voluntarily furnished to the FBI by He. Alon G. Sontinotin —
vho served as an SA of the TBI from July 12, 1946, until his
retirement March 22, 1971. He is presently employed as
IMreector of Safety, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.

“Kelanta, Georgia
May 12, 1975

"Intervie: by Lester B. Siedel, (sia), representative
of Senate Select Committee of Alan C. Sentinella. Interviaz
commenced 12:24pm, terminated 2:20pm. Siedel at the outset
identified self via credential as repeesentative of afera-
mentioned Gomaittec,

"We. Siedel introduced by writer to Le. Seymor

Phillips ef the FRI, The writer explained to Siedel that

felloving his telephone conversation, 5/9/75, during which

ha stated lhe was interested in discussing ratters related

te the Ring and Ievison cases it was felt that such discussion
hee oy, Bight involve issues eurrently sensitive to the Bureau.
Den, ADA eeecdinsiy the Atlanta Office vas contacted and subsequently
joer AD iw. the welter vag contacted by Robert Olmart of the Tureau,
Admin, ___ 2, QEmert advised that if it was desized the Durcau vould
com. Sv. pate available a roprosentative not fer the purpose of partici-
Files acm _patiny in the intervie but te be available for advice. Tho oni
Gen, Inv. -

Ident.

1 ~- 67-432832 (Personnel File Former SA Alan G. Sentinella) «

Inspection

wel. ———]. - 100-106670 (Martin Luther King, Jr.) gt aA
Pin gevet.1 ~ 100-392452 (Stanley David Levison), +: ny Ad
pec. Inv. ; é . oO

Tones —— SPP eler OQ) ( .

Telephone Rm. — (13)

Director Secty. MAIL ROOM{__] ‘TELETYPE UNIT
NW 86296 Docid:32989588 Page 28

Biches. ; SEE NOTE ~ . a GPO 924-544
bi -yr 32.7. aes


NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 29 _

en | q

4
SQ"ATE SELECT CMAILTILE (SSC) OU LATNILIGE SE ccrivirine
RE: INPCRVIET OF RCTIAED PBI SPLCTAL ASELT (G4)

weiter stated he vas interested im obtainins such assistance.
iecordinsly during the cornminy of 5/12/75 Ue. Seymar Phillipa
contacted the wiiter.

'fhis is dictated immediately follaving intervie?
by Siedsal, “‘o effert is herein rade to folloy tha chrenoloxy
of quéstions presented by Siedel., During the intervie no
notes er recordiny vere mace by weiter, WILE use “Q" for
quastion end “AN for ansver. Questions (4) vere asked by
Gledal and ansvers (A) vere given by velter,

“At Yas it correct that matters concerning the King investi-
cation vere discussed openly over coffee by memkers of tha
Atlanta Field office?

‘Ar Entters relatin«: ta the King Investisation were discussad
by imivicuals concerned therevith, £ have no reeolication
vuriny the period T vas comocted rith the investisatian

that it was diseussed by everybady like the previous nicht's
balivane micht hava been.

“Q: Shortly after Rina ceceived the “obel Frias dic a Bureau
nkfiaial Willien Sullivan cora to Stlanta?

“A: It is my recollection King, cocelved tha “obel Prize sometime
berere the ense vas assieeed te ma, Ido mot cerember if Evrecs
official Willian Sullivan visited Atlenta.

"0; Dic Sullivan have any ‘contact with aaiph MeGiLL eoneornin:
Binn?

"Ar Edo not koa.

"Ga: Wore taps (telephone) and bugs (miererhone) used by Atlanta
in copmeetion t1ith Ting?

“4: A tap (telephone) vas utilized re King at lis SCLO office
anc his residence.

"Qs Then wara the bays (mlerephone) utilised?

~2~


* &

« - a .
SIVATR SULTOT EOITETLE (280) OT WGOLLICES

Rs TOPGRVDT! OF RELTAUD OBL SeTeTAL AGENT (84)

t
rl
3
re
™ aa
Fae]
J
4
i‘
rox
es
a
ba

“At There wore cone.

"OQ: Vhat was the purpose of the invastication of Minc?

“as To determine vhother King and/or SCLC vero Influcnead by
marsons ox srouns having cortmist tendencies.

"G3 Did you fool the investication vas vorthuhlle?

"As I don't recall that I ever asked myself that question.
Tt vas an assicrmont made by my omnloyar and my rasponsibility
to handle ik.

"Q: Hor did other acents fool absuwt the Lllezal use of those
tars? .

WA: The tans vora not iLleval. They rere obtained throuch tho
authority of the Attorney General.

‘a: Did any agents express the epinion that these investivations
vere Improper?

"Ax I da not recall spocifieally althouch Ue. Nertauch (sic)
may wall have ao stated.

"QO; What olastronic surveillance was used concerning Lovison?
NA: I do not heer. Levisen rasidaed in Cou York City.
"Ot: Vas Levison covered by the tan on Rinn?

RAs Onky te the extent that ha vas in centact with King. Thoro
res no tap on Tevison per so in Atlanta.

"4; Vas there any physical surveillance of Kinz?
HAs I de not roeall any physical curveilinnce of King ag such.
There vas surveldllenta conductod of individunls in contact with

King anc consequently Kine vould obviously have been physically
surveiiled. But such surveitionca vag not on Kins directly.

w Be

NW 80296 Docld:32989500 Page 30


he

NW 88296 Dochd:32969588 Page 31

-. @ | @
BOWER SULLCT COMAMIToE (SSC) OL SUTRLLIGRICE ACTIVEITIOS
Qo; ZGfOIVIN OF RETIRED VBE SPvciAL £GGIr CsA)
"4, Die you participate da these surcvelllaneas?
"Ar Yos on several occasions.
"9: How many occasions?
"Ar I cannot reeall,
"3; Herr Leng wera you in Atlanta?
MA: gmeust 1960 - Uorch 1972.
"QO: hat other offieas did you serve in ant when?

"A; Enltimore, Saptembar 1640 - January 1949; Buffalo,
Jangary L949 - Aucust 1660; Atlanca, fupust 1960 + Horch 1971,

tt

wt
oF

Vheve cera you borny

‘At Lencen, Onelani,

"2 Bor Lony ein you Live there?

"Ar G years,

“Q:, Vhere did you Live first vhen in this country?

WA: In Dow Jersey appromimtely one year. FT spant most of
ny croving up time im Tova.

"G: You entered the Bureau July 1948 and left in March 1971?
VA: That is correct.

"OQ: Uhon vas the Kins, and SCLO case assinne. to you?

"As T believe bt vas the early part or spring of 1965,

"Q: Her lon; had the investinstion been poinz on beforo you

net the casa?

(a
aod .


, ‘+e . q @

ad a

NW 88296 Docid:32989508 Page 32

SEUATE SELECT COMMITTES (SSC) O41 IWTELLIGECR ACTIVITIES
Qn: INTERVEN: OF ACTIALD PBT SPECIAL AGzaY (84)

"A: ET really am not sure - possibly a year; it wight have
been Longer.

"A: Hovr lonz did the investisation continue?

YA: T cannot actually reeall, .

"9: Vas it stall poins on <then you left the Bureau?
"At Yes, tasardin:; the SCLC,

"33 Hor long after Ring's death did the tap remain?

"Ar EZ cannot ba sure. Tt seems as thouch it vag discontinued
a Short tine after, hovaver I believe it continued for a loencer
period of time on the SCLC.

"OQ: Did you have any contact with nevs media or clargy regardirc
Ring, SCLC, or Levison?

“ ow
WAS cia

"4: Uhat telationship vas thera with the Atlanta Police Pepactront
and what alcetgonic surveillance did it have of King, ECLG, or
Lavisont

"A: Throuchtowt my entire period as agcat in Atlanta I never had
any information as to what electronic surveillance may have been
contacted by the Atlanta Police Pepartment, During the period
of time I vas concerned with King, SCLO, Llevison there vag no
discussion to my knovledce of these matters with the Atlanta
Folica Tepartmont. CGcnorally speaking the rappert with the
police dopsrimant vas seed,

"3s Did you neniter the teps on Bins, SCLC?
WAt va.
49: hat squed vere you assioned te in the Atlenta Office?

"A: Security. Lore correctly it vas referred to as the Secucity
amd Racial Squad.


SESATR SMLECT COMMITTEES (S5¢) ON IVTCLLICENCE ACTIVITINS
RE: WEOVIEY OF RETIRED Per SPoCTAL AGruT CGA)

"Q: ha else was assipned to thig squad? las there a man
reared Hordinc?

NA: Yes.

"Q: Uhat vas his first ramet

"A: Chorles.

VAt he else vas assigned?

YA: Your friend Muctauch, a Richard Davis.

"At this paint the uritcer stated he preferred not to
name additional personnel simply because he did not trish to fool
that they night subsoquently be interviewed as a result. ‘Tho
weiter stated he was cen€ident that Siedel or his agency had
| aleeady been furnished all of these namas by Ne. Martaugh.

He vas informed that in the writer's opinion the Bureau vas
fully able end capable of furnishing this information. Sicdel
opined it vould ba a waste af government money to subpocna tho
weiter te Unshinston Im order to obtain these rames.

| "01 Bid you covelop any evidence celating ta Levison's CP
connections? :

"As Ne.

"Q: Bid you read reports From Rev York renarding Levison?

“A: Yes.

"G: Did thase reports seat forth information from taps and buzs?
"As The reports did not state source of information.

"Q; Did you Enowv tho information cami from taps for buss)?

WAr I did not knoy divectly but prasumed that tt did,

~G~

NW 88296 Docld:32989568 Page 33


NW 85296 Docid:32989508 Page 34

- @

BMATE SELECT COMMITTED (ESC) GT TSTRLLI@TIOS ACTIVITINS

RE: INTERVIC) OF RSTIRGD PBI SELOIAL acnur (sa)

2

ty

"Q: Uhat type of vork vas the Sceurity Squad in Atlanta
concerned with?

“At That squad pelmarily handled matters in the sceurity
catagory, tacial matters, ond also civil riphts mattars.

"0: That bird of matters constituted racial mattors bosicdes
ScCLo?

“A: The investication of COLO vas not a racial matter, Ts
vas concerned vith possible communist influence of the
orconigation. The Ku Bluz Klaa vas a racial matter because
it involved pressures betvren vhite and black persons,

"; Uhat enzanizations or individuals vere investigated in
tho seeurliy caterory?

"A; I have had ro contact with Dureau metters for aver four
years. At this time FT have no knmrledge chat effeet uy ansvor
to your question might have wnon the current status of any
matter of concern to the Bureau.

"Stoel ossentially wepeatet his question ond endeavercd
te eiplain that ha had no desire to affeet the Burcau's investi-.
pative status.

“the uriter advised his anscer to the question remainod
as above. At this point Siedel susmested the writer might wish
to consult ik. Phillips chiech vas vonc,

“Wirlter consulted privately vith Fhillins. After vhich
Phillips entered the writer's offica ani told Siedal that if he
mas seeking the Bureau's policy relative to security, cnelel on:
eivll vishts investications, sama vas in tho Burceulg manuals
avallabla to the Comittee. At this point Siedel sata he ~gs
not after policy but ramos of specific persons and orzenizations
the vrdter weeld nr recall vere under iInvestication,

“ihe uriter restatei foxwer angver to this question
aid explained to Siedel that he did not consivoer himself sa

« J «


a
STE SEIMOT GOLMITLEE C88) C1 INESLLIGEICS ACTIVIVINS

: NW 60296 Docld:32909588 Page 35

é é

ats TTRAVIE! OF ROTTARY PRE spcetan smi (sA>

miive to sunpose thot any of the inferrmation civen ta Gicdel
vould not at some fubere tice appear in print. To vhich
S4edel stated ho woul net be porsonally responsible therofera.
Sieiel "as informed the welter cag rot necessarily statin: he
vould be noxsonally eogponpible therefore. Siaicl pointed out
that he could mot roqudco a different answer to this quastion
at the present tins but wont on to explain the weiter could
be submenaed for this purposa foc opon or closed testimony.
"Oe Turing the course of thase invostirations ule you evar
altor om fabricate any document previously peepared?

HAr vo,
"Q: Do you lmow of auch having been cone in the Atlanta Offiea?
RAg Vo.

"3: Da you know of a tape recording pertaining to King hich
vas sent to les. King?

SA: Net curin: thet toriead. Tt seems I might have heard such
an allocation bet there has been so much material neva nadia
wise the past year or tvo, IT actually cannot be sure vhother fT
read of such an alleration or might bave haari it snid. In any
cose so far as Tam concernad it vas hearsay.

"OG: Uhat cas your partihdration im CAT MRLeRO dnvoctirations and
shat did thoy cover whic you vere in the Atlantis Offiec?

Was T left the Evreaun over Four years aco and have absolutely
no hmovkedse of chat nicht ba the prosent gtntus af any Invosti-
potion by the Eurvonua rast or praesent. IT feel veey strongly that
aoy onsver £ mieht cive could coneaivably adversaly offack tho
Bureau's imvostinctive position. Ver this reasen £ decline to
digeuss this matter.

Siedal stated the Evrecu hoi cecontly otated it had

discontinved COD GALE, The weiter advised ho vas nek avare
of this; that hie ansver above remained the same,

~&«


WO: TOTERVID) OF AUTERED PBT SPSoLAL octte (8

$e)
t

"Qs Po you Imou of any effort by the Eurcau to influcnee a
gohitical cammadon?

- W
VAs Mo.

Ta cedition to the forecoine verhatin atateront,
Sentinclin alse voluntarily furnished to the FBI several
absorvations, tho follovine of which may be of interests

"E, Siodel obviously vas attempting to vorify
allegations made by othor individuals,

"2, #11 of his questions anptarcd to have beon
previously prepared in writing.

"3. dt one point ho cormentad he vas eoncuecting this
interyiay for a colleanue (rok namad).

4, Siodel did net appoar satisfied with the casults
of the intervies. It is prasumad hoe considers the writer's
cospavation to ba minimal.

"5, As Sicdal prapared to deport he was informed
that during 23 years as an agent the uriter sufrered cere
adverse administrative action; that these ultirately proved
to ba enporienees from which the uriter profited. He was told
the writer had "no ane te crind” recording the Burcau and no
intent or desire te accommlish any questionable Literary fan.”

the individual who Intervieced Sentinelia tas oE¢
Staff Member Lester L. Seidoal, not Siclel, as Indicated in
Sentinellats statement.

the Rinse refersad to in Sevtinclia's statement is
the Tate Unetin iather King, Jr., subject of prior invastication
by the fB2, Thea Levisen referrai te is Stnnley David Levisen,
also subject of prior FBI invastication, The SCLO referrcu to
is tha Southern Chriction Leadorship Confcronee, an ormanization
vhieh cus headed by Mine. The Martaudh roferral to Is
érthur eo iactech vo vas an SA of tha FBI from april 16,
1951, until his retirement on September 25, LO7L.

~9-«


NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 37

®

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC) ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
RE: INTERVIEW OF RETIRED FBI SPECIAL AGENT (SA)

NOTE:

Original and one copy to the AG, copy for forwarding
to James A, Wilderotter, Associate Counsel to the President.
Information, herein taken from Sentinella's verbatim statement
and from a separate statement containing his observations, both
of which he voluntarily mailed to S$, F. Phillips of the Senstudy
75 Project. The procedure of furnishing the AG an extra copy for
forvarding to Wilderotter has been established through Liaison
by P. V. Daly of the Legal Counsel's Office with the AG's Office,

-~ 10 -

S/o2 yi vee

SF O/t hus

Ve]

wf <df

af

fs

a ‘
ind $7

ad
Atlanta, Georgia
May 12, 1975

(sa),

Interview by Lester B. Siede1! representative of Senate Select Committee
of Alan G. Sentinella. Interview commenced 12:24pm, terminated 2:20pm.

Siedel at the outset identified self via credential as representative of
aforementioned Committee.

Mr. Siedel introduced by writer to Mr. Seymor Phillips of the FBI. The
writer explained to Siedel that following his telephone conversation, 5/9/75,
during which he stated he was interested in discussing matters related to the
King and Levison cases it was felt that such discussion might involve issues
currently sensitive to the Bureau. Accordingly the Atlanta Office was con-
tacted and subsequently the writer was contacted by Robert Olmert of the Bureau.
Mr. Olmert advised that if it was desired the Bureau would make available a
representative not for the purpose of participating in the interview but to be

available for advice. The writer stated he was interested in obtaining such

OF >
assistance. Accordingly during the morning of 5/12/75 Mr. Seymor Phillips ens
, eS
contacted the writer. eas
iRee
This is dictated immediately following interview by Siedel. No effort \25 il
is herein made to follow the chronology of questions presented by Siedel. Re
ocd
-e 2
rag

During the interview no notes or recording were made by writer. Will use

"Q" for question and "A" for answer. Questions (Q) were asked by Siedel and

GEN

answers (A) were given by writer,

A: Was it correct that matters concerning the King investigation were dis-
cussed openly over coffee by members of the Atlanta field office?

A: .Matters relating to the King investigation were discussed by individuals

concerned therewith. I have no recollection during the period I was connected

with the investigation that it was discussed by everybody like the previous

night's ballgame might have been. i
q

PNW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 38.

°

Q: Shortly after King received the Nobel Prize did a Bureau official William
Sullivan come to Atlanta?
A: It is my recollection King received the Nobel Prize sometime before the

case was assigned to me. I do not remember if Bureau official William Sullivan

visited Atlanta.

Q: Did Sullivan have any contact with Ralph McGill concerning King?

A: I do not know.

Q: Were taps (telephone) and bugs (microphone) used by Atlanta in connection
with King?

A: A tap (telephone) was utilized re King at his SCLC office and his residence.
Q: When were the bugs (microphone) utilized?

A: There were none.

Q: What was the purpose of the investigation of King?

A: ‘To determine whether King and/or SCLC were influencéd by persons or groups

a

having communist tendencies.

Q: Did you feel the investigation was worthwhile?

A: I don't recall that I ever asked myself that question. It was an assign~
ment made by my employer and my responsibility to handle it.

Q: How did other agents feel about the illegal use of these taps?

A: The taps were not illegal. They were obtained through the authority of

the Attorney General. .

Q: Did any agents express the opinion that these investigations were improper?
A: I do not recall specifically although Mr. Murtaugh may well have so stated.
Q: What electronic surveillance was used concerning Levison?

A: I do not know. Levison resided in New York City.

Q: Was Levison covered by the tap on King?

WW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 39.


A: Only to the extent that he was in contact with King. There was no tap
on Levison per se in Atlanta.

Q: Was there any physical surveillance of King?

A: I do not recall any physical surveillance of King as such. There was
surveillance conducted of individuals in contact with King and consequently
King would obviously have been physically surveilled. But such surveillance
was not on King directly.

Q: Did you participate in these surveillances?

A: Yes on several occasions.

Q: How many occasions?

A: I cannot recall.

Q: How long were you in Atlanta?

A: August 1960 - March 1971. .

Q: What other offices did you serve in and when?

A: Baltimore, September 1948 — January 1949; Buffalo, January 1949 - August 1960;
Atlanta, August 1960 - March 1971.

Q: Where were you born?

A: London, England.

Q: How long did you live there?

A: 9 years,

Q: Where did you live first when in this country?

A: In New Jersey approximately one year. I spent most of my growing up time

in Iowa.

Q: You entered the Bureau July 19%48 and left in March 19712

A: That is correct.

Q: When was the King and SCLC case assigned to you?

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 40

; 7 o . . . @ , r

A: I believe it was the early part or spring of 1965.

Q: How long had the investigation been going on before you got the case?
A: I really am not sure - possibly a year; it might have been longer.

A: How long did the investigation continue?

A: I cannot actually recall.

Q: Was it still going on when you left the Bureau?

A: Yes, regarding the SCLC.

Q: How long after King's death did the tap remain?

A: I cannot be sure. It seems as though it was discontinued a short time
after, however I believe it continued for a longer period of time on the SCLC.
Q: Did you have any contact with news media or clergy regarding King, SCLC,
or Levison?

A: No.

Q: What relationship was there with the Atlanta Police Department and

what electronic surveillance did it have of King, SCLC, or Levison?

A: Throughtout my entire period as agent in Atlanta I never had any informa-
tion as to what electronic surveillance may have been conducted by the Atlanta
Police Department. During the period of time I was concerned with King, SCLC,
Levison there was no discussion to my knowledge of these matters with the
Atlanta Police Department. Generally speaking the rapport with the police
department was good.

Q: Did you monitor the taps on King, SCLC?

A: No.

Q: What squad were you assigned to in the Atlanta Office?

A: Security. More correctly it was referred to as the Security and Racial

Squad.

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 41

Q: Who else was assigned to this squad? Was there a man named Harding?
A: Yes.

Q: What was his first name?

A: Charles.

A: Who else was assigned?

A: Your friend Murtaugh, a Richard Davis.

At this point the writer stated he preferred not to name additional per-
sonnel simply because he did not wish to feel that they might subsequently be
interviewed as a result. The writer stated he was confident that Siedel or
his agency had already been furnished all of these names by Mr. Murtaugh.

He was informed that in the writer's opinion the Bureau was fully able and
capable of furnishing this information. -Siedel opined it would be a waste of govern-
ment money to subpoena the writer to Washington in order to obtain these names.
Q: Did you develop any evidence relating to Levison's CP connections?

A: No.

Q: Did you read reports from New York regarding Levison?

A: Yes.

Q: Did these reports set forth information from taps and bugs?

A: The reports did not state source of information,

Q: Did you know the information came from taps (or bugs)?

A: I did not know directly but presumed that it did.

Q: What type of work was the Security Squad in Atlanta concerned with?

A: That squad primarily handled matters in the security category, racial
matters, and also civil rights matters.

Q: What kind of matters constituted racial matters besides SCLC?

NW 68296 Docld:32989588 Page 42

A: The investigation of SCLC was not a racial matter. It was concerned with

possible communist influence of the organization. The Ku Klux Klan was a

racial matter because it involved pressures between white and black persons,
Q: What organizations or individuals were investigated in the security
category?

A: I have had no contact with Bureau matters for over four years. At this
time I have no knowledge what effect my answer to your question might have _ +4
upon the current status of any matter of concern to the Bureau.

Siedel essentially repeated his question and endeavored to explain that

he had no desire to affect the Bureau's investigative status.

The writer advised his answer to the question remained as above. At
this point Siedel suggested the writer might wish to consult Mr. Phillips
which was done.

Writer consulted privately with Phillips. After which Phillips entered
the writer's office and told Siedel that if he was seeking the Bureau's policy
relative to security, racial and civil rights investigations, same was in
the Bureau's manuals available to the Committee. At this point Siedel said
he was not after policy but names of specific persons and organizations the
writer would now recall were under investigation.

The writer restated former answer to this question and explained to
Siedel that he did not consider himself so naive to suppose that any of the
information given to Sielel would not at some future time appear in print.
To which Siedel stated he would not be personally responsible therefore.
Siedel was informed the writer was not necessarily stating he would be personally
responsible therefore. Siedel pointed out that he could not require a different

answer to this question at the present time but went on to explain the writer

NW 86296 Docid:32989588 Page 43

could be subpoenaed for this purpose for open or closed testimony.

Q: During the course of these investigations did you ever alter or fabricate
any document previously prepared?

A: No.

Q: Do you know of such having been done in the Atlanta Office?

A: No.

Q: Do you know of a tape recording pertaining to King which was sent to

Mrs. King?

A: Not during that period. It seems I might have heard such an allegation

but there has been so much material news media wise the past year or two,

I actually cannot be sure whether I read of such an allegation or might have
heard it said. In any case so far as I am concerned it was hearsay.
Q: What was your participation in. COINTELPRO investigations and what did
they cover while you were in the Atlanta Office?
A: I left the Bureau over four years ago and have absolutely no knowledge of
what might be the present status of any investigation by the Bureau past or
present. I feel very strongly that any answer I might give could conceivably \
adversely effect the Bureau's investigative position. For this reason I de-
cline to discuss this matter.

Siedel stated the Bureau had recently stated it had discontinued COINTELPRO.
The writer advised he was not aware of this; that his answer above remained the
same.
Q: Do you know of any effort by the Bureau to influence a political campaign?

A: No.

NW’ 86296 Docid:32989588 Page 44

on } @

Atlanta, Georgia
May 12, 1975

WRITER'S OBSERVATIONS

1. Siedel obviously was attempting to verify allegations made by other individuals.

2. All of his questions appeared to have been previously prepared in writing.

3. At one point he commented he was conducting this interview for a colleague
(not named).

4. Siedel did not appear satisfied with the results of the interview. It is

presumed he considers the writer's cooperation to be minimal.

5. As Siedel prepared to depart he was informed that during 23 years as an

agent the writer suffered some adverse administrative action; that these ulti-

mately proved to be experiences from which the writer profited. He was told

the writer had "no axe to grind" regarding the Bureau and no intent or desire

to accomplish any questionable literary fame.»

6. Upon departing Siedel inquired as to the proximity of the Equitable Building

(office building) and the First National Bank of Atlanta (also office building).

Any significance to these locations was not apparent to the writer. When

informed that banking hours terminated at 4:00pm Siedel made no comment.

NW’ 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 45

Pa ~- ® |

NROO4 AP_ PLAIN

, WITEL“S-22-75 FXH
RECTOR (62-116395)

630
FROMs. ;BYQUERQUE (66-1029)

a Ta

(>

ml

REMYTELCALL, MAY 22, 71975.

ON MAY 21, 1975, SAM PAPICH, DIRECTOR, NEW MEXICO

- Arn _.-
| ae? nd
G@VERNOR'S COMMISSION ON ORGANIZED CRIME (FORMER SPECIAL AGENT ,. i;

FBI), ADVISED HE IS TO APPEAR BEFORE THE CHURCH COMMITTEE IN

. ~~
WASHINGTON, D. Ce, ON THURSDAY, MAY 29, 1975. | Lo
aD ,
- : DA

y
N CONTAINED BR
HEREINIS SSIFIER 4
= oe B OF db

ae
—

“IN
cL RECORDS”
4
Oo
oo

weg

%
Qs
Y |
—_
Sy
W
4
Ls
‘Be
=

5 , . ~ ¢,7' : ;
NW Babs JULI. Bes Page 46 °

— a
|
Merc /. Li INFORMATION CONTAINED a
eats 8 Sif
“4
7 ’ ;
;
|
} : ; ’ : . Fs ns H
oe BX M/E ARG
a ENCLOSURE TY AA
4 a

a te etd

NW 68296 Docld:32989588 Page 47


FD-291 (Rev. 11-1-73)  ) e

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

As consideration for employment in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), United

States Department of Justice, and as a condition for continued employment, I hereby declare
that I intend to be governed by and I will comply with the following provisions:

(1) That I am hereby advised and I understand that Federal law such as
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 793, 794, and 798; Order of the °
President of the United States (Executive Order 11652); and regulations
issued by the Attorney General of the United States (28 Code of Federal »
Regulations, Sections 16.21 through 16.26) prohibit loss, misuse, or un-
authorized disclosure or production of national security information, other
classified information and other nonclassified information in the files of
the FBI;

(2) T understand that unauthorized disclosure of information in the files
of the FBI or information I may acquire as an employee of the FBI could
result in impairment of national security, place human life in jeopardy, or
result in the denial of due process to a person or persons who are subjects
of an FBI investigation, or prevent the FBI from effectively discharging its
responsibilities. I understand the need for this secrecy agreement; there-
fore, as consideration for employment I agree that I will never divulge,
publish, or reveal either by word or conduct, or by other means disclose to
any unauthorized recipient without official written authorization by the
Director of the FBI or his delegate, any information from the investigatory
files of the FBI or any information relating to material contained in the files,
or disclose any information or produce any material acquired as a part of the
performance of my official duties or because of my official status. The burden
is on me to determine, prior to disclosure, whether information may be disclosed
and in this regard I agree to request approval of the Director of the FBI in each
such instance by presenting the full text of my proposed disclosure in writing to __
the Director of the FBI at least thirty (30) days prior to disclosure. I understand
that this agreement is not intended to apply to information which has been placed
in the public domain or to prevent me from writing or speaking about the FBI but
it is intended to prevent disclosure of information where disclosure would be
contrary to law, regulation or public policy. I agree the Director of the FBI is
in a better position than I to make that determination;

(3) I agree that all information acquired by me in connection with my official
duties with the FBI and all official material to which I have access remains
the property of the United States of America, and I will surrender upon demand -
by the Director of the FBI or his delegate, or upon separation from the FBI, any
material relating to such information or property in my possession;

(4) That I understand unauthorized disclosure may be a violation of Federal
law and prosecuted as a criminal offense and in addition to this agreement may
be enforced by means of an injunction or other civil remedy.

I accept the above provisions as conditions for my employment and continued employment

in the FBI. I agree to comply with these provisions both during my employment in the FBI and
following termination of such employment.

bee agihiys 59 Y CONTAINED \

ZATION

(Signature)

(i (Type or print name)

Witnessed and accepted in behalf of the Director, FBI, on

fs Serr

, 19 ___, by

| NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 48 (Signature) _


STANDARD FORM 61 OMB APPROVAL NO. 50-R0118
: REVISED SEPTEMBER 1970
U.S. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

F.P.M. CHARTER 295

APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS

(Position to which appointed) (Date of appointment)
JUSTICE FBI WASHINGTON, De Go,
(Department or agency) (Bureau or division) (Place of employment)
T, — SSeS "edo solemnly swear (or affirm) that—

A. OATH OF OFFICE

I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely,
without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

B. AFFIDAVIT AS TO STRIKING AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

Iam not participating in any strike against the Government of the United States or any agency
thereof, and I will not so participate while an employee of the Government of the United States or
any agency thereof. —_

C. AFFIDAVIT AS TO PURCHASE AND SALE OF OFFICE

I have not, nor has anyone acting in my behalf, given, transferred, promised or paid any con-
sideration for or in expectation or hope of receiving assistance in securing this appointment.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

pare Z 9g, NUASSIF = fC
DATE {= BY SEAM (Signature of appointee)

Subscribed and sworn (or affirmed) before me this day of A.D. 19____,
at WASHINGTON, De. Ceo

(City) (State)

[szax]

(Signature of officer)

Commission expires.

(If by a Notary Public, the date of expiration (Title)
of his Commission should be shown)

NOTE.-T'he oath of office must be administered by a person specisied in 5 U.S.C. 2903. The words “So help me God”
in the oath and the word “swear” wherever it appears above should be stricken out when the appointee elects
to affirm rather than swear to the affidavits; only these words may be stricken and only when the appointee
elects to affirm the affidavits.

i GPO : 1970 O = 408-925

NW_88296_Deeld:32989588 Page 49 sO 7


3-26 (Rev. 3-20-64)

Director (Place)
Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice (Date)

Washington, D. C. 20535
Dear Sir:

Having received an appointment for a position as Special Agent in the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice, I hereby agree and affirm
that I shall be governed by the following conditions:

1. Iam required to proceed at my own expense to Washington, D. C.,
where I shall take the oath of office and enter on duty.

2. That my appointment is a probationary one.

3. That I shall remain on duty for a minimum period of three years,
contingent upon a satisfactory work record.

4, That my retention in the Federal Bureau of Investigation is dependent
upon the performance of satisfactory services, and if my services are
deemed unsatisfactory it is understood that my employment may be dis-
continued at any time and that] shall not receive transportation to my
home, or to any other point, at Government expense.

5. I may be sent to any part of the continental or territorial United States
that the exigencies of the Bureau's work may require; that my head-
quarters may be fixed in some jurisdiction other than that in which ]
have heretofore resided; that my headquarters may be changed as the
work of the Bureau may require and that no, transfer will be made from
one station to another for personal reasons.

6. That the confidential character of the relations of the employees of
the Federal Bureau of Investigation with the public is fully understood
by me, and that the strictly confidential character of any and all in-
formation secured by me, in connection directly or indirectly with my
work as a Special Agent, or the work of other employees of which I
may become cognizant, is fully understood by me, and that neither
during my tenure of service with the Federal Bureau of Investigation
nor at any other time shall [violate this confidence, and | agree and
affirm that I shall not divulge any information of any kind or character
whatsoever that may become known to me, to persons not officially
entitled thereto at any time.

I understand all of the foregoing and the conditions specified herein are agree-
able to me without reservation of any kind. [ agree and affirm that I shall abide by the
foregoing conditions, and I am fully cognizant that the provisions mentioned above are
to be complied with by me and they are a part of my appointment.

Very truly yours,
ALL TOT NTIOM CONTAINED *

2
t »,

Sanaa 3 aging /

NW 85296 Docld:32959508 Page 50


UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

In Reply, Please Refer to
File No.
Date:
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D.C. 20585

TRAINING AGREEMENT

In consideration for the following specialized training which will result in considerable time and expense
to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), I, ——-__________»__ Care to
remain in the service of the FBI (or Department of Justice, as to final item below) for the time specified, contingent
upon my maintaining a satisfactory work record.
(2 So that I may receive training in classifying, searching, and filing of fingerprints, I agree to remain in the service
of the FBI performing fingerprint duties for at least one year from this date. I understand that I may be assigned,
consistent with the demands of the service, to work at night.

[- So that I may receive training in [—] stenographic typing skills, I agree to remain in the FBI for a minimum
of one year after completion of training. In addition, I agree to accept any assignment in any division at FBIHQ
or Washington Field Office consistent with such needs for my services,

(-] So that I may receive training in automatic data processing equipment (_] cryptanalytics, I agree to remain
in the FBI one year after completion of formal training.

(So that I may receive training in a foreign language, I agree to remain in the FBI for three years after I success-
fully complete this training.

(-] So that I may receive advanced training in maintenance and repair of FM radio equipment, I agree to remain in the
service of the FBI for at least one year following completion of the training,

(*) So that I may receive training under the Government Employees Training Act to be given me at
, I agree to remain in the Department of Justice for a minimum of
_after completion of training. If I voluntarily leave the Department before
expiration of that period, I will pay the Government the amount of the additional expenses paid by it for the
above-mentioned training.

ALL INFORM ON CONTAINED

pate POY 3 og wye_—

Signature

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 51


NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 52

. he Application for Employment

FD-140 (Rev. 16-16-73)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20535

NOTICE: Application must be typewritten or clearly printed in black ink. All questions must be answered, if applicable. If not, indicate NA (not applicable). Applications which
are not complete and legible will not be considered. If space provided fs not sufficient for complete answers, or you wish to furnish additional information, attach sheets of the same
size as this application, and number answers to correspond with questions,

Check Position Applied For: * .
Special Agent (Cl) Laboratory Aid or Technician ([) Clerk-Stenographer

(CD Special Agent (Accountant) (CD Tronaletor ([) Cleck-Typise
(J) Rodio Maintenonce Technician * (Nurse (2) Clerk (See Item 4, page 2 on Fingerprint

* Applicants for this position must complete “Questionnaire for Radio Maintenance Clerk position)
Technician Position.” CJ Other

1. PERSONAL HISTORY
a. Name in full (Last, first, middle) b. Social Security Number

c. List all other names you have used including nicknames; if female, fumish maiden name. If you have ever used any sumames other than your true name, during what period
and under what circumstances were these names used? If you have ever legally changed your name, give date, place, and court.

d, Birth date (Month, day, year) e. Are you a U, S, citizen? [_) Yes [_)No Naturalized? (_jYes [_]No Derivative? [7] Yes [_)No

Naturalization #

Place of birth Place Date Court
Explain derivative citizenship — EE

2. MARITAL STATUS

COSingle ([j)Maried — No. of Children
Place of Marriage

(Widowed [(] Divorced
CT Separated Place of Divorce or Legal Separation Court (See Section 13k)

a. Present Residence Address: (Apartment, street, city, atote, zip code) Telephone Numbers:

Residence

Business
b, Complete address to which you wish mail or telegram sent (include zip code and teleplione number if different from above)

c List chronologically ALL of your residences in the past 10 yeara (include addresses while attending schoo! if away from home and all military addresses including any off
military base).

The Federal Bureau of investigation is on equal opportunity employer.

ALL INFORMATION CO} .
Se LD SE
bate LLV-OF "py HY E_


4, AVAILABILITY OF APPLICANT
a. Have you previously submitted an application for employment with the Federal | e. If appointed to a clerical position, I am willing to serve a minimum period of one
Bureau of Investigation? year.
(No (JYes Date Place =n 5 (7) ¥es [No
B. Ar =~ ~ Ce = . appointed as a Special Agent or Radio Maintenance Technician, are you willing
Sze you willing to proceed to Washington, D. C., or other duty station, at your own and prepared to accept assignment or transfer'to any part of the United States or
(LJ Yes [(]No Puerto Rico for either temporary or permanent duration? (Yes [“JNo
c. Will you accept a lesser position if no vacancy exists or you fail to qualify for the
Position sought? ClyYes CJNo

d. Are you interested in appointment as Fingerprint Clerk GS 3 at Washington, D. C.?

Yes No You must understand that regardless of preference, appointment

may be as Fingerprint Clerk GS 8 or Clerk GS 2 since assignments must be based on
qualifications of appointees and vacancies.

g. If appointed as a Special Agent, I agree to serve a minimum period of three
years and completely understand that I must be available for assignment where-
ever my services are needed, Cres (No

h. Earliest date available for employment.

i. How much notice of reporting date do you need?

Name of School Location

High Schools

No Yes
O O School

c. List awards, honors, citations, positions held in school organizations, athletic
endecvors, and ony other special recognition you received while attending school.

f. Are you a member of the bar?
[[No (() Yes Date(s)

State(a).

g Are you a certified public accountant?
(CINo ()¥es Date(s)

State(s)

. Are you a licensed automobile operator?
(DJNo [Yes Statets)

h Driver’s License #

List chronologically afl employments, including.summer and part-time employments while attending school. All time must be accounted for. If unemployed for a-period, indicate,|
setting forth dotes of unemployment. .

Dates . Position and Kind
Name and Address of Employer Salary of Work Name of Supervisor Reason for Leaving
Dal

Oo
TE | Pp |

NW 88296 Docid:327989588


6. EMPLOYMENT

List chronologically all employments, including summer and part-time employments while attending school. All time must be accounted for. If unemployed for a period, indicate,|
setting forth dotes of unemployment. :

Dates Position and Kind

Name and Address of Employer T Salary of Work Name of Supervisor Reason for Leaving

From To
io. Day
City & State

City & State

City & State

e. Name

Address

City & State

City & State

g- Have you ever been dismissed or asked to resign from any employment or position you have held?

(No [((} Yes

Employer's Name Date Reason

h. Are you now or have you ever been employed by an agency of the Federal Government? (Include part-time employment.) (No [Yes

From To Agency

—_—. Location
i, Do you have any sources of income other than your salary or that of your spouse? CONco CYes

Specify each with amount

7. MILITARY RECORD
a, Are you registered for Selective Service? CONe Cres

Selective Service # Lottery #_ Local Board #
b. What is your current classification? | Have you received any notice indicating you may be called into the Armed Forces in the near future? (No [Yes

If so, give approximate date.

ec. If ever classified 1-Y (registrant qualified for military service only in time of | d. Have you ever served on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States?
war or national emergency) or 4-F (registrant not qualified for any military

service), furnish reasons, C1No C)¥es Date commissioned,
Highest rank attained if applicable
e. Branch of military service f. Serial number g. Dates of active duty (month, day & year)
From To
h. Type of Discharge Basis for Discharge i. Member of Reserve? CONo (ves [Ready [] Standby

Service Branch

| NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 54


j. Was any type of disciplinary action taken against you in the service?

k. National Guard [7)Present [_]Former “[_]None
CONo [Yes Nature of:

If you attend drills, meetings, or cemps, give name of unit and location.

Summer camp attendance: From

Where.

(Active duty between 12-7-41 and 71-56 [7] Active duty subsequent to 1-31-55 in excess of 180

consecutive days _ [__] Service-connected disability [7] Wife [_]Widow [[]Mother
8,: REFERENCES

Give three references (not relatives, former or present employets, fellow employees or school teachers) who are responsible adults of reputable standing in their communities,
such as property owners, business or professional men or women including your physician, if you have one,, who have known you woll for at least five years, preferably those
who have known you during the past five years, If retired, give former occupation.

_.
™

Occupation
Business

° Addresses:

To

1. Do you claim veterane preference? (No [—]¥es Basis:

Residence

Complete name Addresses:

Residence

No. yrs.,aca.

Complete name

Residence

No. yrs. aca. Occupation
. . . Business

Give three social acquaintances in your own age group including both sexes.

Complete name

No. yrs. acq. School or Occupation

No. yre. aca. School or Occupation

Addresses:

Residence

School or
Business

Addresses:

Residence

School or
Business -

Addresses:

Complete name

Residence:

No. yrs. aca. School or Occupation

School or
Business

9. FOREIGN TRAVEL - (MILITARY SERVICE, RESIDENCE, VISIT)
vw] a, Have you ever visited or resided in any foreign country (including travel in the Armed Forces of the U. S.)? (CINe [Yes

Date issued Place issued =

Countries Visited Reason for Travel

ee

ry

NW 68296 Docld:32989588 Page 55

L

, e @

V. fave you ever served in the Armed Forces of a foreign country?-
i Wee countries; dates) en tty: (No [_] Yes

c. Do you or any members ot your immediate tamily, including in-laws, have any relatives now residing outside the United States (except those in the Armed
Forces cf the United States or those employed by the United States Government living abroad)? [—)No [(] Yes. If so, list below and furnish degree of
association and contact you and members of your immediate family have with these relatives.

Citiaen of what County

10. CREDIT RECORD

a, Has your credit record ever been considered unsatisfactory, or have you ever been refused credit? ((]No (_] Yes
(If “yes,” give dates, places, names of creditors and circumstances.)

b, Are you indebted to anyone? No ms) Yes
(List any debt over $100. Also list any debt, regardless of the amount, where payment is past due.) Loan or

Address Amount | Acct # |

Hi. COURT RECORD

a. Have you ever been arrested or charged with any violation including traffic, but not parking tickets? No Yes
(List all such matters even if not formally charged, or no court appearance, or found not guilty, or matter settled by payment of fine or forfeiture of collateral.)

ate Place and Department Final disposition Details

io

b. Has any member of your family or close relative (including in-laws) ever been arrested for other than traffic violations? (_]No [_] Yes

¢- Have you ever been a plaintiff or defendant in a court action including divorce actions? (-]No (_]Yes (Give date, place, court, names of parties involved, nature of
action, and final disposition.)

4

12, ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIP

a, Are you now, or have you ever been a member of any club, society or organization? [_]No [_]Yes. If yes, list below, do not abbreviate.

Name Former Present (List position held and extent of activity)

5

NW 862796 Docld:37989588 Page 56


b. Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party, U.S.A., or any communist or fascist organization? [_]No [_] Yes

¢. Are you now or have you'ever been a member of any foreign or domestic organization, association, movement, group, or combination of persons which is totalitarian, fascist,
communist, or subversive, or which has adopted, or shows a policy of advocating or approving the commission of acts of force or violence to deny other persone their rights
under the Constitution of the United States, or which seeks to alter the form of Government of the United States by unconstitutional means? [_] No Yes
(If answer to any Of these is “Yes,” explain fully.)

13. RELATIVES

All applicants must give complete information conceming their relatives. If you have been married more than once, give the requested information concerning each former

husband or wife. Furnish similar information, including date and place of action, for any members of your-immediate family who have been divorced. Even though a relative

is deceased, give all the information requested, and indicate last residence and year of death, Include stepbrothers and sisters,-half brothers and sisters. If you or your
spouse have stepparents, legal guardians orothers whohave reared you instead of your parents, the requested information should be furnished concerning them, as well as your

real parents. If you are engaged to be married or contemplating marriage in the near future, complete information must be included under sections c, h, i and j regarding your
future husband or wife and future in-laws, and clearly show that such relationship is a future one.

| - : -
: 2 t 7 Ti
| _ Complete Name, including Middle Name (no initials) ; Complete Address Occupation & Name & Address of Firm paaiaalization or Al Date

and Place of Naturalization,
if applicable,

Mother (Include maiden name)

Address

Place of birth

Wife or Husband (If wife, include maiden name}

Birth date Place of birth

Birth date Place of birth

Name

Address

Birth date Place of birth

Place of birth

—

NW 68296 Docld:32989588 Page 5f
—- a


Complete Name, including Middle Name (no initials) ; Complete Address

e. Brothers

Address

Birth date

Address

Birth date Place of birth

Address

*

Birth date

+ Sisters

Address

Birth date

Place of birth

13. RELATIVES (Continued)

Place of birth

Place of birth

Occupation & Name & Address of Firm
where Employed

Naturalization or Alien
Registration Number, Date
and Place of Naturalization,

applicable

Nome
Address
Birth date Place of birth

Nome

Address

Birth date Place of birth

- Wives lincluding maiden names) and-Husbands of Brothers & Sisters

Birth date

Place of birth

Place of birth

| NW 88296 Docld:32989538 Page 58

“


13, RELATIVES (Continued)

Occupation & Name & Address of Firm
where Employ

Naturalization or Alien
Registration Number, Date
and Place of Naturalization,
if applicable

Complete Name, including Middle Name (no initials) ; Complete Address
& Wives ond Husbands of Brothers & Sisters (Continued)

&

Place of birth

Birth date

Place of birth .

Place of birth ~

Birth date

h. Father-in-low

Place of birth

is Motherin-law (Include maiden name)

Place of birth

i+ Brothers & Sisters of your Husband or Wife

Birth date Place of birth

Birth date

NW 88296 Docld:32585588 Page 53


. e | @

é 13. RELATIVES (Continued)
* * 5 eae 0 tion & N: & Add f Fi Naturalization or Alien
Complete Name, including Middle Name (no initials) ; Complete Address coups’ on where Employed oem Registration Number, Date
and Place of Naturalization,
if applicable

Place of birth -

- Other relctives with whom you have resided for an extended period of time
(indicate relation, including name and present location of ex-spouses) ‘

j. Brothers & Sisters of your Husbend or Wife (Continued)

Address

Birth date

Birth date Place of birth

Birth date Place of birth

14. RELATIVES EMPLOYED BY THE GOVERNMENT
List the complete names of any of your close relatives (including in-laws) who are employed in the Federal Government.
Complete Name Relation Agency by which Employed Location

15. FRIENDS OR ACQUAINTANCES EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Complete Name Location

Po Eoeation
16. RELATIVES FORMERLY EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Complete Name under which Employed Current Address | Relationship |

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 60

ALL APPLICANTS

Attach an unmounted full face photograph of yourself, not larger than
2% x 2% inches, Print your name plainly on the back of the photograph.
The photograph must have been taken not more than 3 months prior to
the date of this application.

17. PHYSICAL DATA
a. Height without shoes |b. Do you now have or have you ever had any of the following: nervous, mental, or emotional disorder of any sort; tuberculosis; epilepsy, fainting
spells or severe headaches; diabetes; ulcers; rheumatic fever or heart disease; or asthma? [_]No [[] Yes

df “yes” identify, describe, and give dates) *
Weight without clothes

c. Do you now have or have you ever had any chronic or serious illnesses; or have you ever had any serious operations or injuries? (CINo (J Yes
(If “yes* describe and give dates) '

d. Have you ever been hospitalized? (_]No ["] Yes

Bates Hospital

e. Describe any past or present physical handicap, defect, or disability not previously covered, but including extent of defective vision, if any, with and without glasses
(Snellen) and deficiencies in color vision and heering.

f. How many days have you lost from work): Nature of illnesa(es)
or school due to illness during the past
five years?

g. Have you ever received, is there pending, have you applied for, or do you intend to apply for pension or compensation for existing disability? [_]No (Yes
(If “yes,” specify what kind, granted by whom, and what amount, when, why. If applicable, include Veterans’ Administration claim number.)

rh. Special Agent Applicants Only: Do you have any physical defects such as, but not limited to, a bone, joint, or other deformity or loss of finger, which would
preclude unrestricted, regular participation in all phases of the FBI’s firearms training, physical training and defensive tactics? [_]No [_] Yeo
(If “yes’’ describe)

J understend that all appointments are probstionary for a periad of one year during which | must demonstrate my fitness for continued employment by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. I also understand that, in many parts of the Bureau, it has been necessary to establish regular night and midnight shifts In view of which | must be available
for such assignments as the needs might require. | further understand that any appointment tendered me will be contingent {pen the results of a complete character and fit-
ness investigation, ond | em awere that wilfully withholding Infermation or making false statements on this application will bethe basis for dismissal from the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, and constitutes o violation of Section 700% Title 18, U.S. Code. | agree to these conditions and I hereby certify that all stotements made by me on this
application are true cnd complete, te the best of my knowledge.

Signature of Applicant as Usually Written (Do not use nickname)

GPO: 1974 - 538-864

NW 88296 Docld:32969588 Page 61


NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 62

j
| 140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION -
“ “ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee:_____ SENATE SELECT COMMITTER
COLTR CR)LHM [Memo [Report dated |
U.S. Senate Select Committee to Study Govt.
Caption of Document: Operations with Respect to Intelli-
gence Activities; Re:Request Pertaining to Elec-
tronic Surveillance;Other S ecific FBI Practices
and, Prosramss “Polictes and Procedures

Delivered by:

Received by:

* Title:

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

tee - - = ~

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED *.
HEREIN POT oy SS
pate 4

~ 4 met 2- Mr. J, A, Mintz
) 1 - Mr. BE. W. Walsh
\ / The fictorney General. June 4, LOPS
cf 1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall
“ ; . 7 L - Mr. W. O. Cregar
x Birector, EBL 1 «Mr, S. F. Phillips
C2 Pp
: <3 SUITES STATES oS SULEGT (QUT Trn
‘. S GY TGESLGGRceR LORTVITiss (sse3

MS ae Tne
ar be Peferones is made te a letter Fron the $60 dated
* Uay 14, £875, ond oppendices thereta, raquesting certain
o> deeusente ond other Information fron the Far,
oe iterched for your’ approvel oud forvanding to tha

a N Comuittes is the original of « memorandum and enclosures which
., SY). sonstitute 2 portial | response covering a nudber of the Raquasts

ne t

| get forth in refevoncad letter and its appendices, & copy of

> ' this menorandua cod of the enclosures therets are subtitted |
mY nf for your records. * , /

\

~ ~ Enclosures ~ 12
nat . ALL SE oA)
at AN GRR LLORD HEREIGIS JORYSS
els 3 624116395 HERELYIS A Sat fe —

iL - The Deputy éttorney General
*etentions KR. Sdlian OMonnor
\ aaeet Counsel for
Intelligence Coondlinatiozn

~~ srr men oo be if MLZ, 2A 7

i

’ i7 JUN-13 ‘915

’
/

i 4 gueLasee

Dep. AD Adm. _ : vaqn 4
Dep. AD Inv. ___ is i ' “ Le AY
Asst. Dir:
Admin,
Comp. Syst, ‘ i a) vhne
Ext. Affairs __. ey
Files & Com. ./ . ;
Gen, Inv. iu
Ident,
Inspectio

pga?

“Laboratory
Plan. & Eval,
Spec. Inv.

Training (_
Legal Soyhe
Telepho Ted

Dircesor Sac #975 Room arm \ phterypE UNIT LJ
| aA Nt NA Gl 32989588 Page 63

PE ya
ie 6 ei


So } - n®... iintz
. ' . (1 = Mr. J.B. Hotis)

- Er. E. W. Walsh
lir, W. R. Wannall
- Mr, W. 0. Cregar

-~ Mr, S, F. Phillips
62-116395 June 4, 1975
U.S, SHITE SSLcer CUAETIEE To sTuoy
GOVLRITOTAL GFARATIGONS WEVA
BESPCCT TO THIRELIGINCS LOTIVITICS
REQULSE SCNESESINS TO DERCIRONES SUNVETLELANGE

GHD SPhCIFIC PRE FAGbicus s55 age

Moree oN
t

POLIGES £00 PACSOGSALSS

Reference is nade to letter dated Ifay 14, L875, to the
‘ttorney Generel frou the Chairman of captioned Comibttea, ond
Sppendices therete, vhick requested certain documenta ond other
inforuntion from the PGT.

‘ppendices € and 0 contain requests for the current
office of assinmment or last know address for a number of FAT
eaapioyees, Set out below under appropriate headings relating
to the specific request headings and numbers is the desired
information, as well as information concerning the tenure of PBI
service of all the employees involved,

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

ippendix C = Zten 30 HERE ti NELASSIF
DATE Bye

a.) Leo Badgley app, Jr.
Entered on duty (£99) as Special agent (SA), Sune 17, 1957
éissigned Portland Field Offiee (70) since Beeanber 1, 1959

bh.) Edenr GO, Ingedis, Jr. Gingles on your request)

S00 as SA, Harehk 21, 1966 y)

Aisoe: Di fasigned Portiand FO since fugust 7, (£970 Me

ep. AD Adm.
wenden” fppendize D = tem 1 y f

Comp. Syst, “

ee Anes fig) Robert Le Tage - *)
Gone EO? ss SA, November 8, 1950 f -
Hest, mo = I éssigned Casha FO since January 19, 1973

Intell. : ‘ B Py

ettoln Sept ac: obs /ftie teLosung: ly a Me D W's S-

Spec. Inv. .
Troining —___ (9 This document ts prepared in responte lo pour Sen AGE and is not for disse
Legal Coun. nation outside your Committee. Its use is limited to officiat proveljngs by

olophone Rm he content may aot be fisclosed to wneutho a’ Os:
Director Sec’y ___ MAIL ROOM Cee Panurattt pee epee Y i Me ning persi
the é. ppro f


SoALTR SOLTGT GOVT ON DCALIG CE (OTEVELL SS
Tg DEQUEST PUOPALNINS TO PLRETROUEC CRWCILLIES

b.) Jehn D. Meode
EOD ag 35, Jomaary 20, 1952
fisolgned Unbladelphia PO aimee Janusry 17, 1966

GJ PULL D. Willicns (BiLlio on your request)
POD an Sh, February 4, 1952
fesiomed Speefal toent in Charpa, Reasas CLty Fo
sines boredher 17, 1074

d,}) John J. Cxceoner, Jc.
Aaa as SA, Septenber 33, 1994
ésaienel fssistent Swelal (gent in Charnes,
Little Meck FO sines May 1, 1975

a.) John J, Connolly
Lod as Bh, duly 7, 1947
Assigned Hevark FO sinee Carch 30, 1963

£,) ierjorie mm lSersejeveki GHergejeuski on your request)
SOY Juno 26, 1861
fsehemed Uswark FO since Jume 26, 1061

Qs) ory “em Uldzabeth Uessa Goss on your request}
729 June 27, 1955 .
/fsaiened Vevork FO simee June 27, 1955

sspondis li - From 12

aed Uexold &. Leinboich Giinebsuch on your request)
TS an Of, Cetobex 20, 1947
Neelred Fobruary 16, 1973, froma SSL Ueadcuorters
Last timo addenss 1169 tanbledon Brive,
Usher, Virgiaia 22101

b.) “ner Lee Todd
1G) os Si, Dacembex LL, 1950
‘gsirned “Washington Tield Offices since dJanusry 22, 1955

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 65


SRIEG COREST COMIEICR Of FNINLLIG§ION /CriIvires

Bas BEQUEST POOSAESEUG TO RETCRnOlIe SURVRTELon

Rite (ones -cibrosle

Goo Tuby 19, 1939

fetived Lecenber 28, 1973

Last knowm address Lf04 John Street, Pork Los, Lew Jersey 07024

| Theaas Jock Dianonte
| EOS ac SA, July 6, 1989
| fssicnal Rews 9/28/62

| Glen Ciosa
| Lo Sepkeskhar 20, 1043

| Lesigned Covenber 29, L065

| tastknovn aldvess 10400 South Tndlena ‘venue, Chicaco,
| Tliinels 60628

Theotore fndrayw Rorontyis
Roy ap U4, Jame 30, Lou?
iasipaend PRI leectquarters sinee Uarch 15, LO75

Joseph C, itichela
S09 an SA, Jely 2, 195,
fssioned Uone 5/26/63 te 9/1/65 ond 12/14/76 to present

taddres 5, Rich

GO Juke 8, 1946

Retixes Tuma 28, L974

“Last hoown cddrass 11056 113th Drive, Youngtorn, frirena 05369 .

lisien ©, Spear
Loa ‘ped 93, L951 .
cackymad Rene 5/6/62 te 1/12/67 end 4/23/71 to presont

syponsis: BD « Eten 25

a} Mohart G. Runkel
Ten os G4, Joly 11, 1049
ésatgned Ypeelal fesat in Cherge, ‘lesanmirice fo,
sines Unrch 22, 1974
Laws 882596 Dochd:32989508 Page 66

EE eeeEEeEeeeeeee

. 6 é

SULT SUEDCY COLLITT On OU GERULAIen Ss coreverrecs
BS: OWICST TSTALOENS TO SLSCTROUIC SUNYRILEISISS

b.) Courtland J. Jones
LOS as Gui, Getober G6, LOAL
Retired Soptenber 30, L974
Last known cddress 6607 Vorth 25th Stereoet,
iplington, Virnbain 22213

@.) Exnast i, Yeltor
C23 as Sh, July 19, 1043
Uetlirad January 29, 1973
Last known address G16 Mdmor Read, Oliver Sprins,
Useylend 20604 ;

da.) Jones 4. ak iney
maid es Shy “Yorels 5, LOSE
“ssignead 1 inghinoton Field Gifieo since Jaouery 29, 1962

ipoexdiz bP = Teen 19

a? Jos soph i, Sagoo
red ag Sey Raverber 1, 1938
Uetired Lay 19, 1972
Last bnown eddrocs 244 linn Creseont, Uhisge
North Curolina 26369

b.} Ldehkael Joseph Lenenis
GQ as SA, Mevermber 3, 1947
Netirad Jame 12, 1976
Last Ino < eddross 6809 Gulf Drive, Uolmes Loach,
Florids 33510

ovine Cines,

ce

¢.) St erling B, Honchoo @enchie on your noasest)
Tio as SA, Jomuery 6, 194" & 12917
Last tenors eddeosa 2613 Spiral Lens, Dolo. iorylond 20715

d.) Cernard 4, Wells, Ir.
md eg SS, Jana 6, 1949
Retired July 26, 1971
Last know addresa 5311 sontcosery Street,
Sprincficld, Viecinia 22151

~he

“NW 85296 Docld:32989508 Page 6f


SCUAES SOLCGE CcIRTEES OH TSTCALICISe. (OVIVERTs

ae IS PS ER py ep mage Roae
Path-y Sieh cork Dinh oS £ SREOTT MIEG GOVE

o.} Tebore 0. leemes
Doo & £58 hy | Qetober 16, 2950
Netéren Vere 28, LOf5
host town address 205 Jertixicor Drive,
MLiver Spring, Caryland 20o9L

forendis Ho = Teen 2G

idéen FP. iiiler (len on your request)
WO as SA, Larch 31,1947
Sashemed 2 tena Pa since Jane 21, 1OSL

fopeadin O, Ptem 1<9 reqrested a souple of the
confidentiality steonont which PRE porsoniel axe require te
sien alone with uy other enployment acreenonts currently in
So, itteched o a ¢opies of tha follovins @ocunenks recponsiva
to this eoqenskt

1.) Eu-201 nploynent foreeneant

2%,) Stonderd fora G1 fopointuent /ffidevits

3.) 3-26 Fora letter fron POL Speelat ten
appointee to mt

UD375 Teaining ferosctcnh __

Lii-lGO “Application for Exployuent

five formas carrently im uca furnish
wie Diviclen.

NW 68296 Docld:32989588 Page 68


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 , 5010~306  )

MAY 1962 EDITION "

GSA GEN. REG. NO, 27 |
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT — Assoc. Dir.

Dop. AD Adm. _
Dep. AD Inv. __

\ ie Memorandum cree

Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs —__

Me. J. B. Adams DATE: June 2, 1975 Files & Com.

Gon. Inv,

Ident.

Ohi Inspection
FROM“: Legal Counse ri : Ie Boe
we £3 y al ‘ato! —_—,

Ce me ee AUL INFORMATION CONTAINED a ap era
SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75 73 WERE Te g) Spee. Inv.
DATE <, Training

Telephone Rm. —

meee Director Sec’y __
On the morning of May 30, 1975, Mr. Robert Nichols
(SA-Retired), and SA John Dennis Miller, Legal Analysis ~ dl pd
Office, met in Miller's office, prior to Nichol's appointment U
for interview by members of the staff of the Senate Select
Committee.

Miller gave Nichols a copy of the Committee's rules
at approximately 8:35 a.m. after Nichols stated he had not
been given a copy by anyone else. He advised Nichols that
nothing Miller was about to say was intended to or should
be interpreted as an order or suggestion to be uncooperative
with the Senate Select Committee or its staff.

Miller then advised Nichols he had the right to be
represented by an attorney; if he is unable to retain an
attorney, he should so advise the Committee staff and ask them
to assist him in securing counsel; and the FBI could not
provide the services of an attorney. Nichols said he

understood. REC-1007 tent “S| le 39s a a

Miller then escorted Nichols to the JEH Buildin
where he met SAs Paul V. Daly and Seymor F, Phillips.
temesicece | GK
RECOMMENDATION : {3
5 JUN 46 1975

Mr. Wannall (|

- Mr. Mintz

Mr. Cregar
-~ Mr. Daly ‘
- Mr. Hotis
Personnel File 67- 414885 ghiRis
(Former SA Robert Nichols) (Ss ,

For information

ee
1 i

I

7ee ooh .
me AN (>:

\ ee
t ’

8 4 JUN 1 3 1975

b Nw 88296. Doctd: 32989588 Page 69


ge OFTIONAL FORMNO. 10 5010-106 , a
ce See @ . eo
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT | Assoe, Bie

: Memorandum
i Ext, Affairs __
ih a J. B. Adams DATE: 5-23-75 been Com.
Ident>
FRO Legal Counsé . needa

ALL INFORMATION CO
HERES pO

BY Plan. &4 ie

Spec. Inv.

oy Labor tory 4
: a,

ZA zal Cor i
wel Gerona 75

eremnai yoneai a

Training

Telephone Rm,

1
On the evening of 5-20-75 Deputy Assistant Attorney _ pirecter soc’y __
General K. William O'Conner telephonically advised SA Paul V. Daly
of the Legal Counsel Division that the Department had reached a te
concerning the scope of testimony to be allowéd in the Senate Select
Committee interview of former SA Alan G, S@ntinella. We previously
had informed the Department that Mr. a that Do was to testify pursuant

to a subpoena before this Committee and that Department of Justice Order
501-73 requires we obtain Departmental approval before testimony may

be given. We also informed the Department that Lester B. Seidel , staff
member of the Senate Select Committee, had advised SA Daly that the
scope of the intended interview of Sentinella would include knowledge
Sentinella may have concerning the investigations of Martin Luther King,
Stanley David Levinson, and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference
(SCLC). Mr. Seidel” also indicated that they would interview Sentinella
concerning his activities between the years 1960 to 1971. rae

\

Mr. O'Conner advised SA Daly that the decision of Deputy /
Attorney General Harold R. Tyler; Assistant Attorney General Antonin “4
Scalia, and Associate Deputy Attorney General Robert McDermott was that*
Sentinella was released insofar as the Department was concerned to only
discuss three areas, those areas being the FBI investigations of Martin Luther
King, Stanley David Levinson, and SCLC. He was to advise the Committee
that he was not permitted to go outside of these three areas because of
instructions from the Department of Justice which instructions were issued
pursuant to Department of Justice Order 501-73,

On 5-21-75 former SA Sentinella was advised of the
Departmental restrictions on the information he could furnish the Committee
by SA Daly, and he was accompanied by SA Daly to the Senate Select Committee
office located in G308 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. Sentinella's
interview was scheduled for 9:30 a.m. Mr. Seidel met um. Sentinella and
at 9:31 a.m. furnished Me (aontinalla a copy of the Rules £ Procedure for

62-116395 ™ ~ bh SG 3. BZ AP

ey: f '
gpersonnel File of Former

i - Mr. Wannall 7
1- Mr. Mintz az JUN 15 Special Agent Alan G.
1- Mr. Cregar wus _:  Sentinella (67-432832)
othe Hotis 1 - Mr. Daly

4 JUNI (8) CONTINUED - OVER

4506 Doclid: 32aB94R8 § Page 70


| NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 71

x 7 2
oa od .
a ~ d

Legal Counsel to Mr, J, B, Adams
RE: SENSTUDY 75

the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to
Intelligence Activities. At the same time, former SA Sentinella was furnished
forms which Seidel. requested he fill out at that time. Seidel also madé
reference to Sentinella's Fifth Amendment rights but did not specify or spell
out his rights.

It was brought to Mr. Seidel 's attention by SA Daly that the Rules
adopted by the Senate Select Committee called for a witness to be given copies
of the Rules 24 hours prior to his appearance before the Committee and that
these Rules are important for a potential witness to have knowledge of prior to
his being interviewed since they contain a list of rights and privileges which a
witness is entitled to. It was also brought to Mr. Seidel 's attention that despite
the fact that the interview was to be initiated at 10 a.m. (initially the interview
was scheduled for 9:30 a.m. ,however, upon arrival former SA Sentinella was
advised it would not be held until 10 a.m.) with Mr. Sentinella being required
to fill out forms, he would have very little opportunity to review and digest the
Rules of the Committee.

Mr. Seidel was also advised of the restrictions placed onthe
area which former SA Sentinella could respond to by the Department of Justice.
Mr. Seidel specifically requested that he be allowed to ask questions concerning
"COINTELPRO! He was advised that this was not within the scope of the
Department's release for Sentinella unless such information may have been
related to the investigations of Martin Luther King, Stanley David Levinson, or
SCLC.

SA Daly also explained to John Elliff, Task Force Head for the
Committee on Domestic Intelligence Matters, the circumstances surrounding
the failure to provide a copy of the Rules 24 hours prior to interview and of the
lack of specificity of Mr. Seidel as to areas/which Mr. Sentinella would be
interviewed; <«. -=. Mr, Elliff apologized for the oversight of the Committee
in complying with its Rules and assured SA Daly this would not happen again.
In addition, he was advised that the Rules of the Committee provide that witnesses
would have a reasonable opportunity to inspect and correct their testimony,
however, the Rules provide that a witness must inspect his testimony in the
office of the Committee, It was pointed out to Mr. Elliff that such procedures
were unreasonable in that in Mr. Sentinella's instance, he would have to travel
from Atlanta to Washington, D. C., to review the transcript of his testimony at
his own expense. Mr. Elliff indicated that he believed other arrangements
concerning this particular aspect of the Rules could and would be worked out,

-2- CONTINUED - OVER

Legal Counsel to Mr. J. B. Adams
RE: SENSTUDY 75

7

Mr. Sentinella at the conclusion of his testimony advised SA Daly,
who was not present at the testimony, that the Committee adhered to the restrictions
placed on his testimony by the Attorney General with one possible exception, They
asked Mr. Sentinella if while he was working in Atlanta his squad investigated the
"Klan" and "'SNCC" (Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee). Sentinella
advised he did not raise an objection to this question because he felt the deviation
from the De artmental restrictions was very slight, and our investigations of
these matters/Wéll known.

On the afternoon of 5-21-75 K, William O'Conner inquired of
SA Daly how the interview went and he was generally advised of the facts surrounding
the interview, including the fact that former SA Sentinella was not furnished a copy
of the Rules until immediately preceding the interview. Mr. O'Conner inquired
as to whether the Senator (‘Senator Robert Morgan [D-N.C. ]) remained during the
taking of testimony from Mr. Sentinella, and he was advised that according to
Sentinella, Senator Morgan departed approximately five minutes after placing
Mr. Sentinella under oath.

Mr. O'Conner expressed his displeasure at the way the Committee
operated and indicated he was going to discuss this matter with Deputy Attorney
General Tyler.

Subsequently, on 5-21-75 O'Conner indicated he had been in contact
with James Wilderotter, assistant to the Counsel to the President, and Deputy
Attorney General Tyler, and they want the Bureau to prepare a letter protesting
the Committee's handling of the interview of Sentinella and of the fact that they
violated Rules which were adopted by that Committee, specifically the Rules
requiring Mr. Sentinella be furnished a copy of the Committee Rules 24 hours
prior to giving testimony to the Committee, failure to be specific concerning the
areas to be covered by Sentinella's testimony, the general manner in which the
rights of Sentinella were explained to him, and the fact that Senator Morgan
departed from the Committee session after giving the oath, O'Conner explained
in this regard Deputy Attorney General Tyler feels that this is in contravention
of the Rules of the Committee, and he questions whether an executive session of
the Committee being held to hear such testimony can continue in the absence of a
Senate Committee Member. He requested this letter be directed to Senator
Church. He was advised that such a detter could only be prepared after approval
had been obtained from proper Bureau authorities, and it was also pointed out
to Mr. O'Conner that we had orally protested this matter to Mr. Elliff of the
Committee and Mr, Seidel , and he was apprised of Elliff's statement that such
mistakes would not be repeated in the future, It was pointed out to Mr. O'Conner

-3- CONTINUED - OVER

NW 85296 Docid:32989588 Page 72


Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams
RE: SENSTUDY 75

that the Bureau had furnished former SA Sentinella a detailed briefing of his
rights and a briefing as to what was contained in the Rules of the Committee
prior to his interview. Mr. O'Conner again requested that we prepare a letter
protesting this matter.

It is not felt that a letter concerning this particular matter should
be directed to Senator Church in view of Mr. Elliff's statement that this
incident will not be repeated in the future. It is felt that our oral protest to the
Committee is sufficient at this point, especially inasmuch as they accepted the
limitations placed on the testimony of former SA Sentinella by the Department.
It would appear we could expect to achieve very little by sending such a letter
at this time.

RECOMMENDATION:

That we orally advise Mr. O'Conner the Bureau does not feel
a letter should be directed to the fel this particular incident.

PYP Abby v>
/ pane. 4 vate

pany ane ie

Wer abate] net Cty ly

Gur ob.cgr, pipe

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 73


o oo. 60126
, (Sttice of t! e Attorney Generate . jor ee
Lo a Washington, O. c. 20530 : pueliee ac vz

. _ ip A", [iiss

a i —
So, ot wa 301975 + 7
ye me i a

tf. eee
f ‘Honorable Frank Church, .Chaizman eo je
’ United States Senate Select Committee a ee

on Intelligence Activities
; Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Church:

It is ny understanding that the continuing efforts of
’ staff members of the Executive and Legislative Branches to
prepare standard guidelines for witness interview procedures
are continuing this week. While that process continues, the
Department of Justice is, of course, continuing to cooperate
in an ad hoc and responsive manner, In order, to ensure our
attention to these cooperative efforts, I have designated
K, William O'Connor as Special Counsel for Intelligence
- €oordination and as such he will be the (principle liaison
.. officer of DOJ in this effort, I understand that-your Chief
Counsel and members of his staff are now dealing with
“Mr. O'Connox in the execution of their responsibilities.

_, In the meantime, in an effort to expedite the coopera-
tive provision of appropriate information to SSC, it would be
most helpful if the Committee Staff would ensure that, the |
Départuent of JastLEe 1 is” advised, in “advance” “oF Committee _
Staff “contact with FBI ‘employees and ‘former e ‘emp loyees , of the
name” “of the withess and the scope of the prospective ‘interview.
“THIS would facilitate the interview proééss , since it would
make it possible to ensure that appropriate instructions are
issued to the witness under 28 CFR 16.22, and would permit
_ early decision upon the release of any applicable secrecy
“Tagreements, me

-* pua.per antonio commamzy + ve oi

ae Warner
f pf : . } _ a oe one (TOPO
hit ” i oe . : a “17 JUNAS 1975
oe Sei

; Mo37S. oe me
NW aca ws Gas. 74 ,

othe . - Ks
” .
a. . woe . ,

-~2~
; . 7 la
¢In the same vein, I should like to invite your attention

to some procedural matters surrounding recent witness presenta—
tion before the Committee, It appears, from reports which J}
have received, that two former..FBI. agents who © recently appeared,
did 3 not receive copies of the Committee's Rules of Procedures
until immediately before appearance before the Committee; and

- that the scope of their proposed testimony was defined with
‘somewhat less than optimum precision for pre-clearance. Some
procedural problems are almost inet able especially in the
“early stages of hearings. I know that you share my interest
din assuring that full’procedural due process is wenequivocally
provided to all witnesses who testify before the Committee or
are interviewed by Committee Staff. In calling this matter to
“your attention I seek your support in restricting such problems
. to a minimum and prospectively avoiding others of like kind.

Sincerely,

. 7 . . ‘ : a .
se) na .

ila

*.: Attorney General

arent nen pee we Een cere nner ne ne celeste a ltneny eamesteed alae eee Linen ene steetnemen sume settee ere aeeel

: roy he" tal
foe dee 4 a a MF or ”

_ NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 75


pyeres ‘on NO, 10 a
MAY,1962 EDITION:
. . GSA PMR ua CERD VOI TES @ @ A&soe. Dir.
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Dep. AD Adm. —

Dep. AD nv. —
Memorandum “ne

omp. Syst. ———

Ext. Affairs —_
TO : Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 6-4-5 Gon

Ident.

Inspection,
FRoM : Legal Counse Vi—— nen Be,

kD? ALL INF: ORESATION CONTAINED . Legal Foun.

ad HEREI NSAP pss Pn

sugject: SENSTUDY 75 pare GOL [o oven,
ee .

eee ee Telephone Rm. —
The purpose of this memorandum is to advise that a

representative of captioned Committee has advised that if the Bureau's
response to a Committee request concerning the Democratic Convention
in Atlantic City in 1964 is sufficiently informative it may not be necessary
to interview Bureau personnel concerning this matter and to recommend
that an expeditious effort be made to furnish a summary concerning the
Atlantic City investigation be made available along with certain documents
concerning this matter.

Director Sec’y __

By way of background, we have received a reqie st dated
5~14-75 pertaining to many items, among which was information concerning
the Bureau's activities in Atlantic City in 1964 at the Democratic National
Convention. At a meeting on 5-30-75 it was pointed out to the Committee
that certain aspects of thein May 14, 1975, request were particularly
burdensome, would in some instances invadeé privacy and for other reason
was most difficult. During this meeting which was attended by Mark Gite
staff member of the Committee; John Elliff, Task Force Director;
representatives of the Bureau; and K, William O'Conner, Special. Counsel}
to the Deputy Attorney General for Intelligence Coordination, the Commitfee
representatives indicated that subject to the Senate Committee's approval
they would accept some sort of summary with regard-to their request in

t- \Appendix D, Item 8 of the May 14, 1975, request, This item pertains to
the Bureau's activities in Atlantic City.

We have had former Agents interviewed concerning this
matter, a request has been made to interview two Bureau secretaries, and
the Committee has indicated they intend to interview as many as five
additional Bureau Agents concérning this matter. In conversation with
K. William O’Connér, he mentioned that the Committee had specifically
informed him that if the Bureau's an was informative enough concerning

62-116395 ley ba Le 3h GIO

1 ~ Mr. Wannall \ ne 1- Mr. aoe ses © Seah
1 - Mr. Cregar De 1- Mr. D JUN 10 p75

1 - Mr. Mintz Smt me

oe
—e

‘ if es (1) CONTINUED - OVER On er
Buy U. U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

bg 882960-Decld: 32989588 Pa

«.

”

‘ . 6
eof _

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams Memo
RE: SENSTUDY 75

the Atlantic City matter, they would not interview the two Bureau
secretaries, Mary Ann Massa and M. Ann Mierzejewski. (The request
concerning the interview of these Bureau employees, who are Newark
Office employees, is the subject of a separate memorandum captioned
and dated same.) He requested SA Paul V. Daly to contact Mark
Gitenstein in an effort to determine what type of response the Committee
expected concerning the Atlantic City incident.

-On 6-4-75, SA Daly contacted Mr. Gitenstein and Mr. Gitenstein
advised that the Committee knew of the existence of certain memoranda
and in particular a memorandum from former Assistant to the Director
C. D. DeLoach reporting a conversation with the President requesting Bureau
coverage at the Convention. Gitenstein stated that with regard to the
Atlantic City incident, if a summary was prepared concerning this incident
which would in general show the types of people whose conversations were
monitored, the type of information collected, and the type of information
disseminated along with furnishing the Committee certain important documents
that it would not be necessary to interview Bureau personnel. He indicated
among the documents they would expect to be furnished would be the DeLoach
memorandum along with other “benign” documents which would not involvea
privacy consideration or other considerations which might preclude their
being made available tothe Committee. Gitenstein indicated that it is the
Committee's feeling that information of a political nature such as the
credehtials argument at the Convention was collected and furnished to the
White House and that the collection and dissemination of this information is
not apparently in concert with the ostensive purpose of electronic surveillance.
He felt that the summary need not and should not identify individuals monitored
but rather describe them such as a senator or some other descriptive phrase
to describe the individual whose conversation might have been monitored.
He said as tod the verification of the information contained in the summary
with the information in the files, that subject will be addressed by the
Committee at a later time.

Gitenstein again mentioned that if such information was
furnished by the Bureau, their need to interview employees would be muted
as what they are attempting to learn through interview of Agents involved
would have already been furnished by the Bureau, He volunteered’that the
Committee is relatively well informed concerning this particular matter.

It is obvious from the specific mention of the DeLoach memorandum along
with other observations and statements he made that this could well be true.

-2- CONTINUED - OVER

NW 65296 Docld:32989508 Page 7?

Legal Counsel to Mr. J. B. Adams Memo
RE: SENSTUDY 75

It is realized that the White House has requested that a
paper be prepared which would include the Atlantic City incident; however,
K. William O'Conné@r indicated that he had conversed with
Mr. James Wilderotter, assistant to the Counsel to the President, and
that Wilderotter had advised that document requests pertaining to
Atlantic City or any other topic which will be addressed in a paper should
be responded to and response should not be delayed.

It would appear to be advantageous to the Bureau to attempt
to comply with the summary request along with furnishing certain documents
concerning Atlantic City on an expeditious basis as opposed to the Committee
continuing to conduct interviews of current and former Bureau personnel. °
If this type of arrangement can be worked out in this particular incident
which the Committee characterizes as an abuse, it might lend itself to a
Similar arrangement in other areas.

RECOMMENDATION:
That the Intelligence Division expeditiously prepare a

summary in line with the above concerning the Atlantic City incident along
with furnishing the important documents concerning this incident.

wr eee?

*

This 13 bow dove Ghie—

NW 88296 Docld:32989568 Page 78

| Assoc. Dr}
4 Dep-A-D-Ade— |

¢ Comp. Syst. —__ §
A Ext. Affairs _.§
/.4 Files & Com Wf
7” Gen. Inv. 4

axons gD
SPER PURE Sp Gave Wtsast \a¥) a
NR 807 SF CODR “SOMMUNIGATIONS 8 “= “Y

5213 PM NITEL.5/14/75 MCC WN [7 Gen, Taw. ~
TO DIRECTOR (62=11f395) cLeryes | Ged fe
1 Labdratery

Plan. & Eval. —|

FROM SAW FRANCISCO Spee. Inv.

TIN a \ peat
- . 0 Tel fohiohe Rm, FF
SENSTUDY 75 , . Director See’y __ ji
4
RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL OFFICES DATED MAY 2, 1975, ABQVE ra
. ; V/
CAPTION.: . of ‘f
mee,
ve ()

ON MAY 14, 1975, LESTER B. SEIDEL, INVESTIGATOR, SENATE (.°
SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AGYIVITIES, WASHINGTON, D.C.,
TELEPHONICALLY CONTACTED THE SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE AND REQUESTED
THE IDENTITY OF THE SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE OF THE SAN FRANCISCO
OFFICE IN 1978. HE WAS ADVISED THAT SPECIAL. AGENT IN CHARGE

CHARLES WABATES SERVED IN THAT CAPACITY FROM JANUARY, 1570,

THROUGH APRIL, 19763 THAT FORMER SPECIAL AGENZ IN CHARGE HARRY Je. a
RGAN (NOW RETIRED) SERVED FROM APRIL, 1979/4, THROUGH SEPTEMBER,

NQRGAN reimare ener naen

19783 AND THAT ASSISTANT D DIRECTOR ROBERT E / GeBHARDT SERVED As Lee

SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE FROM SEPTEMBER, fas,” THROUGH NOVEMBER,

1972. PU oy (ok [1 IC ©}
SEIDEL DID NOT INDICATE THE SPECIFIC NATURE OF” ikl Mah N

OTHER THAT IT WAS CONNECTED WITH THE COMMITTEE WITH WHICH, HE 1s. 4

A . Pree
AFFILIATED. hued sie
ABOVE BEING FURNISHED FOR INFORMATION OF BUREAU. Ue
END Decels th Wk Ehalag “ In

ad SE, 5 4 mw C ‘ Mum,
\ AU ECRMATION CONTAINED

HOLD ane | 1S SSF
Le Don — ERLE IA

. wr J. B. Adams v
7 tT. J. Jenkins “f
ra &

coh Assistant Director

; i}
CODE bs TELETYPE NITEL Aor!
“2 . aI)

TO Abt SACS Dp | may ‘TS, 1975
| FROM DIRECTOR FBI sea-anes08)97 L PERSONAL ATTENTION
} SENSTUDY - 75. 1 - Mr. Wo. O. Cregar

_ REBUTEL MAY 2, 1975. 1 P

IN CONNECTION WITH WORK OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE SELECT
COMMITTEES, ITS REPRESENTATIVES MAY CONTACT YOUR OFFICE FOR
INFORMATION.

IN ONE RECENT INSTANCE, A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SENATE
SELECT COMMITTEE TELEPHONICALLY INQUIRED AS TO IDENTITY OF SAC
IN A PARTICULAR OFFICE DURING 1970.

IN HANDLING SUCH INQUIRIES INSURE ESTABLISHING BONA FIDES
OF REPRESENTATIVE BY SHOW OF CREDENTIALS ON PERSONAL CONTACT OR,
Iv TELEPHONIC CONTACT, BY TELEPHONING BACK TO COMMITTER.

UNLESS INFORMATION IS OF A PUBLIC NATURE, AS IN THE INSTANCE

CITED ABOVE, OBTAIN FBIHQ CLEARANCE PRIOR TO SUPPLYING ANY

Y INFORUATION. FBIHO MUGHWRUEMPROLRAGUSLY ADVISED OF ALL
Al

Ni INFORMATION FURNISHED COMMUNICATIONS aah postion ONTAINED :
x . . MAY 2 } a7s, EINAS J SS} Pe

SFPRreme ANN A 5 DATE Bi ALKO

_ (49) Lic 4e } a

NOTE: TELE eu" @u* 4 |

eee Dime hs Referenced teletype alerted field to work of the 1 rn

Dep. AD Inv. e Senate and House Select Committees and Bureau's handling of

Asst. Dina”, its requests. Also, it pointed out FBI has pledged full coop-
Cone gue eration with Committees. San Francisco teletype 5/14/75 advised
Ex. Atfors that on that day Lester B. Seidel, Investigator, Senate Select
Files & Com. — Committee, telephonically sought and was furnished identities

Gen. ww! __—. of SACS in San Francisco in 1970. Seidel did not indicate

Ident.

Inspec ib | specific nature of his inquiries. Considering the publicity

mee Cea “being afforded the work of the Committee, it is not inconceivable
ays ome unauthorized persons may attempt to obtain information from
Spec. Inve wy, he FBI particularly at field level, under guise of one of the
Training ey if sommittecs, It is se believed this teletype to all SACs
Legal Coun LY” 9g, desir. 3,ap a cant ig ary measure. ben

ree Rm.

irector reese AuI7ROOM [F og ETYPE ont OL, oro. mo rare
Docid:32989588 pale Cao tira is = gore sin,

te
erty


>... 5 OS

LEGAL DIVISION

Attached teletype advises former
Agent Richard H. Davis, Atlanta Office, had
been contacted by Senate Select Committee (SSC)
Staff Member (FNU) Epstein in an attempt by
Epstein to arrange an interview concerning

| Bureau investigation of Martin Luther King.

. On the night of 6-4-75, Michael Epstein, Staff
| Member SSC advised SA Paul V. Daly that he -had
' contacted former Agent Davis to arrange inter-
view concerning Bureau investigation of Martin
Luther King, Stanley David Levison,,. and
Southern Leadership Christian,Conference (SLCC).
Epstein stated Davis refuse@ to-syubmit to inter
| vwilew since he was bound by an employment
secrecy agreement and needed necessary clear-
ance from Bureau. He told Epstein that he

| would not contact Bureau for such clearance.
‘Epstein requested Bureau release Davis from
the agreement for purposes of this interview '
which will be a staff interview in Atlanta.

Legal Division recommends Davis be
released from security agreement for purposes
of this interview and to answer questions
concerning the King, Levison, and SLCC investi-
gations. If approved, we will separately |
advise Davis through Atlanta Office of this |
decision, and give him pertinent briefing.

- Intelligence Division awa"
- Administrative Division

Legal Counsel Division De {

Mr. Dal J w

"pie serie i ae

PVD:eek ~ "Fit ivf ORMATI COONTAINT

(5) HEREIM} SSIFI
DATE (7 BY

NW 88296 Docid:37989588 Page 81

ae
I


een

W 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 82

sre +
6 eee PAE Wand’), CARN

CO ean Seer

i
t
NR@25 AT CODED

8e@8 PM NITEL JUNE 4, 1975 JWS

TOs DIRECTOR , FBI (62-116395)
FROM: ATLANTA (62-2854)
ETN: INTD .D. CREGAR fh ie “fte2t RONTAINED -,
_ ATTN: 1 W aR ah

Ate

rit aa . GUN SUF?
(SENSTUDY "75," are py OR

Se _
ON 674/75, FORMER AGENT RICHARD H. DAVIS, 1147 WILD CREEK

TRAIL, Ne Evy ATLANTA, GAos ADVISED HE WAS CONTACTED THIS DATE
BY (FNUD EPSTEIN WHOM HE BELIEVED WAS CALLING FROM WASHINGTON s
D.C. DAVIS STATED HE FEELS EPSTEIN IS A MEMBER OF THE SENATE

MARTIN LUTHER KING CASE. EPSTEIN STATED HE WISHED TO INTERVIEW
DAVIS EITHER IN ATLANTA OR WASHINGTON, D. C.3 HOWEVER, DAVIS

Assu
Dep oS
Dep a 4

Asst bt

Admin

Corp Set
xt. Affaira - —— F
Piles & Com. —. fi
Gen. Inv.

Ident.

Inspeution ._

intelli.

Lab iatoty a
& aan aH
Spee. we AB
eon Cx)

Legal cn

Telephone
Director Sec’y ~~

Plaa.

SAID THAT NO DEFINGTE. ARRANGEMENTS WERE MADE DURING CONVERSATION

OTHER THAN HE YOULD CONTACT EPSTEIN AS TO APPROPRIATE DATE FOR

INTERVIEW IN ATLANTA « iD, 9 (2 -Ub-
DAVIS WAS INFORMED HE COULD CONFACT THE OFFICE OF LEGAL

COUNSEL COLLECT FOR ASSISTANCE IN THIS MATTER. DaVIS STATED

HE WOULD DO SO. 7 sun Yd sors

END . , z=

HOLD

§ 4 JUN A 4 7

RL
AS

whee

lh j

SELECT COMMITTEE SINCE INQUIRY CONCERNED DAVIS’ KNOWLEDGE OF ff


Wi

Brom

ll ° v5) ee
supjecT: SENSTUDY 75 Src I
martteneneemtsntnnanegernsernsornsnitt raipiag

1 - Mr. Wannaill es GT?
1 -Mr. Mintz .
1-W. O. Cregar B JUN 12 1975
1 - Mr. Daly CQNTINUED...OMER ,
1 -Mr. Hotis q
\a"
gq unt eae oh
NW 88296 Docld:3 ang Page 83

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 SS 5010-106 ii
© MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GENYREG, NO, 27

* “geNtTED STATES GOVERNMENT Dap. AD Adm. _

: Mr. J. B. Adams DATE:5-30-75 Files & Com. —

. Legal C Ayn . i se
A ems ( NS =4

«, to documents and witnesses and requested they be furnished some basic

‘ materials concerning the CIA's authority to conduct intelligence investigations.
‘. They also requested that the Committee be provided with all the materials

. Fequested by the Senate Select Committee. Colby pointed out that the

Assoc. Dir. ___.

Dep. AD Inv. —

“Memorandum : set

Comp. Syst. _—
Ext. Affairs __—

Gen. Inv.
Ident.

Telephone Rm. —

This memorandum reports the results of an executive —PiysteSe-'y—
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group OT f
of Congressional Review for the Intelligence Community on 5-28-75.
The meeting was chaired by William Colby, Director of Central Intelligence.
Also present were: Philip Buchen, Counsel to the President, James
Wilder otter, Associate Counsel to the President, Thomas K. Latimer,
Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense, John M. Clarke, Associate
Deputy to the DCI for the Intelligence Community, William O'Connor,
Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination, Department of Justice,
Section Chief William O. Cregar, Inspector John B. Hotis, and senior
officials of the State Department, National Security Agency, Office of
Management and Budget, Defense Department, and the Treasury Department.

The following matters of interest were discussed at the

meeting ya
House Select Committee on Intelligence Activities ‘eee Vn,

Mr. Colby said he met earlier this week with Chairman’
Nedzi of the House Select Committee on Intelligence Activities, Jobn L.
Boos, Chief Counsel, and A. Searle Field, Committee Staff Director.
He said they seemed interested in the relationship which had developed
between the Senate Committee and CIA and asked where he thought the
Senate inquiry was going. They also discussed procedures regarding access.

House Resolution (H-Res. 138) which established the Select Committee

_ prohibits the disclosure of information outside the Committee without

- Comimittee approval. There is some question, however, whether this

,.- Resolution can supersede Rule it ofits Rules of the House of LD / 9

_. —
vé @
t ‘ 6
e _
.

Legal Counsel to Adams Memorandum
Re: SENSTUDY 75

which provides that members of the House shall have access to all
Committee records. He said Congressman Robert N. Giaimo (D-Conn.)
has indicated that he will not accept any limitations on access. Colby

said he will appear in an open session before the Committee sometime

in the next few weeks to discuss, in general terms, the agency's position on
collection of intelligence information.

Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities

Mr. Wilderotter said that F. A. O. Schwarz, Counsel to
the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities, has agreed to identify
in advance specific allegations of abuse that will be reviewed by the
Committee. Wilderotter said he will then appoint a task force or some
other coordinating mechanism within the executive branch to examine each
of these areas in depth. The purpose will be to develop an executive
department brief on each subject which can be used to respond to Committee
requests. He felt that this might enable the Administration to gain the
initiative on these issues and perhaps limit the Committee's inquiries to the
boundaries set forth in the Senate Resolution. He asked that the agencies
make an effort to identify abuse subjects so that the White House can pull
together all the information available on each topic. He said it is already
clear that the Committee will examine such subjects as assassinations
and the CIA's role in the internal affairs of Chile and the Dominican Republic.

Mr. E. H. Knoche, Assistant to the Director, Central

Intelligence Agency, reported that Mr. Colby has made three appearances
before the Senate Select Committee and on each occasion discussed
assassination matters. Mr. Colby will meet with the Committee three times
next week, and it is expected that he will be asked about the Phoenix program
and the covert activities of the CIA including political, counterintelligence,
and clandestine intelligence collection. The Committee will trace the agency's

operations back to the 1947 directive in an effort to determine how they

| relate to policy objectives of the Government.

Mr. William G. Hyland, Director of Intelligence and Research,
Department of State, said the Committee has requested position papers
‘on the Department's activities in Laos and Chile and to explain of the Depart-
ment's approach to covert action and whether it was a supplement or instrument
of policy. Mr. Hyland raised the question of whether the agencies had any
moral obligation to advise former employees that documents were now being

CONTINUED - OVER

NW 88796 Docld:32989588 Page 64
| _ _— a Sc


NW 85296 Docid:32989508 Page 85

Legal Counsel to Adams Memorandum
Re: SENSTUDY 75

“ak
we

made available to Congress. He felt that they should be given an opportunity
to review these files prior to interview in order to refresh their memories.
Mr. Wilderotter agreed and said that each agency should adopt a similar
policy.

Mr. John M. Clarke, Associate Deputy to the DCI, asked
whether anyone knew what John Elliff hoped to accomplish as Director of
the Task Force on Domestic Intelligence. We pointed out that his earlier
writings would indicate that he intends to draft an intelligence charter for
the FBI, and perhaps the entire intelligence community. Elliff has made
a comprehensive study over the past several years of the Bureau's internal
security intelligence functions, including sources of the FBI's authority and
the legal restrictions of its operations. This was the subject of a paper he
submitted at the Princeton Conference in 1971, and he has since called for
the establishment of legal standards for the Bureau's collection, retention,
and dissemination of intelligence information.

Mr. Buchen then requested that the FBI draft a proposed
intelligence charter for the Bureau. He felt that it would be helpful for
the Administration to have a proposal available which it might use to counter
any recommendations made by the Committee. At the end of the meeting
Mr. Wilderotter asked that a second paper be prepared reviewing all
of Mr. Elliff's articles on the subject of domestic intelligence with the
view toward identifying those issues which seem to be of major importance.

With regard to Mr. Buchen's request, we feel that it would
be inappropriate for the Bureau to draft an intelligence charter for the
executive branch. It is the responsibility of the White House and other
consumers of intelligence to define their needs and propose appropriate
operating authority. We also question the utility of reviewing Professor
Elliff's writings on the domestic intelligence functions. We feel a better
course of action at this point is simply to ask Mr. EIlliff to define the goals
and objectives of his task force. He has always been very candid and forthright
and we have no reason to think that he would be reluctant to discuss the matter
with us. In addition, it is likely his views on the intelligence function differ
from those expressed in his earlier articles, and it is best to get his current
thinking on the problem. If this approach proves unsuccessful, we can then
resort to a review of his written materials.

RECOMMENDATIONS
CONTINUED - OVER


a  )  )
La

ren Sa

Legal Counsel to Adams Memorandum
Re: SENSTUDY 75

RECOMMENDATIONS:
(1) That Legal Counsel Division advise Mr. Wilderotter
that we feel it is inappropriate for the Bureau to draft an intelligence

charter ¢fthe FBI and recommend that the White House draft a statement
of its intelligence needs.

(2) That Legal Counsel Division contact Mr. Elliff and
attempt. to determine what his goals and objectives ‘are as Director of
the Task Force on Domestic Intelligence.

C.° ga [p> /
wee Of

¢ us

NW 85296 Docid:32989508 Page 86


SUBJECT:

OPTIONAL FORM Nn. 10 . 5010-106 on . oo. —_ .

MAY 1962 EDITION

Csa GEN. REG. NO. 27  )

UNITED STATES . Assoc, Oe

Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep. AD Inv. —

Lp, —J--B, Adams. Asst. Dir
ee SATO MTEC Admin.

Memorandum

G-=<“ireHotis) Ext. Affairs —
Mr. W. R. tannaae@ iC DATE: 6/6/75 Files & Com, —
~ Me -8 ental Wont
“ Mr. W. oO. Cregar Inspection
oO [Uteses - Mr. H. W. Dare Intell.

me

Comp. Syst. _—

Laboratory

Mr. L, F, Schwartz Legal Coun. __
Plon. & Eval. —__

“ SENSTUDY 75 \ Spec, Inv.

Training
ae al Telephone Rm.

eee ee

~ Director Sec’y
This records the results of contact with Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) concerning release to Senate Select
Committee (SSC) of two documents pertaining to Appendix C,
Paragraph 24 of the SSC request to the Department of 5/14/75,
which requested "all memoranda and other materials reflecting
conversations, contacts or ‘communications between the FBI and
the CIA on the subject of the establishment or creation of
‘notional’ Marxist-Leninist organizations withnthe United States.”

No information has been developed indicating this Bureau
conferred with CIA regarding the establishment or creation of a
Bureau~sponsored "notional" Marxist-Leninist organization.
Although the FBI did, in fact, direct several such organizations,
no information has been developed indicating the FBI consulted
with CIA regarding their establishment or creation.

in one instance, CIA advised in 2/70 it had establishéd;
a notional organization with post office box addresses in Bosfon
Massachusetts and Philadelphia} Pennsfivania. This notions ,
organization, to be known as the Union for the Revolution, hat
the objective of developing penetrations and/or sources in
revolutionary Arab groups in the Middle East. It was CIA's
intention to circulate propaganda from the post office boxes in
anticipation of interesting Arab groups. Thereafter, it was
CIA's plan to use its personnel under "suitable" cover to
contact the Arab groups. (See memorandum dated sgceps: captioned
"Union for the nn rane copy a bg
By letterhead memora date’ Bolt ae fut -/
indicated information had been r@&ceived indicating the Union
for the Revolutig had been in contact with a domestic Marxist-
Leninist organi: ation requesting literature. This memorandum
set forth an 4 Aly, is of a “Statement of the Union for the
Revolution” ind icing the document lacked credibility as a
revolutionary” doe climene. (LHM dated 3/23Z270, captioned "Union
for the Revolution,” 100-456409-4, copy attachédy =m

62-116395 ost 5S JUN 14 1975
WY)

(8) é CONTINUED ~ OVER //

1975;
weno UN 41 1975

; Doclid:32989588 Page 87


Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall
Re: Senstudy 75
62-116395

On 6/6/75, Mr. Walter Elder, CIA, advised that CIA
had no objection to the LHM dated 3/23/70, being furnished to
the SSC, With regard to the memorandum from Mr. Papich to
Mr. Brennan dated 2/13/70, Mr. Elder requested that the name
of the CIA representative who furnished the information in the
memorandum be deleted from line one of the memorandum prior to
its being furnished to the SSC, Provided this is done, CIA has
no objection to this memorandum being furnished to the SSC,

He suggested that when the name is deleted, it be replaced with
the phrase "A CiA officer,"

ACTION:

To record CIA's clearance of the above-described
documents.

1’,

| NW 88295 Docld:32989588 Page 38


SECRET

Appendix C, II, 24

Please provide; all memoranda and other materials
reflecting conversations, contacts, or communications between the
FBI and the CIA on the subject of the establishment or creation of
"notional" Marxist-Leninist organizations within the United States.

No information has been developed indicating this Bureau
conferred with CIA regarding the establishment or creation of a Bureau-
sponsored "notional" Marxist-Leninist organization. Although the FBI
did, in fact, direct several such organizations, no information has been
developed indicating the FBI consulted with CIA regarding their
establishment or creation.

In one instance, CIA advised in 2/70 it had established
a notional organization with post office box_addresses in Boston,
Massachusetts, and Philadelphia, Pesylvania. This notional organization,
to be known as the Union for the Revolution, had the objective of developing
penetrations and/or sources in revolutionary Arab groups in the Middle
Hast.-. It was CIA's intention to circulate propaganda from the post office
boxes in anticipation of interesting Arab groups. Thereafter, it was
CIA's plan to use its personnel under 'suitable'' cover to contact the
Arab groups. (See memorandum dated 2/13/70 captioned "Union for the
Revolution, '' 100-456409-2, copy attached. )~

By letterhead memorandum dated 3/23/70, the FBI
indicated information had been received indicating the Union for the
Revolution had been in contact with a domestic Marxist-Leninist organization
requesting literature. This memorandum set forth an analysis of a
"Statement of the Union for the Revolution" indicating the document lacked
credibility as a revolutionary document. (LHM dated 3/23/70 captioned
"Union for the Revolution, ' 100-456409-4, copy attached. )

CIA, it is recommended before any information be disseminated outside

As the Union for the Revolution was strictly a creation of
the FBI relating to this organization, clearance be obtained through CIA.

Prepared by SA David

Ryan, IS-3, 5/28/"5 4
SECRET ner yan, 18-3, 5/28/

oe

v
Classified by ash ¥%&

Exempt from GDS, Category 2&3
Date of Declassification Indefinite nite LO; / |

ENCLUSUR: (po Q-I Mle BIS

NW 60296 Docld:32909508 Page 89

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN,, REG. NO. 27

UNITED STATES @... MENT
Memorandum

Mr. J. B. Adams

Wl i!

FROM : egal comsel i

DATE:

6/4/75

Assoc, Dir. —__
Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep. AD Inv. —_

Asst. Dirt
Admin,
Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs —
Files & Com, __
Gen. Inv.
ident.
Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory

SUBJECT: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
“ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Telephone Rm.

At 4:55 p.m. on June 4, 1975, Daniel M. Armstrong,
telephonically advised me that he has no not as yet been contacted by the
Sénate Select Committee staff for interview but it was his intention
to call Mark Giteiistein to discuss further his interview by the Committee.
Mr. Armstrong inquired as to whether the Bureau has any objections to
his discussing the two subject areas previously described by Mr. Gitenstein.
Those areas were Armstrong’s knowledge of the Bureau’s Intelligence
Division activities as a result of his employment in the FBI, and his
knowledge of the possibility of the Bureau getting an Executive Order
establishing the FBI's authority in security matters.

I advised Mr. Armstrong that to the extent that the interview
would concern those two subjects, the Bureau would have no objection
and he could consider his secrecy agreement waived, but only to that
extent. Mr. Armstrong inquired as to whether there were any particula
problems with information he furnished to me on May 28, 1975. I told
him that the waiver of the agreement was conditioned on the one limitati
that he would not furnish information that would identify informants, _.-“

‘ compromise current investigations, or on-going programs, or reveal
other sensitive matters which should be reserved for the information of |
members of the Committee or the Chairman of the Committee.

\s

I told Mr. Armstrong that the Bureau would have available
during his interview, though not present at the interview, a representative
who would provide him with counsel as to any problems concerning subjects
he may be reluctant to discuss with the Committee representative. I

Plan. & Eval. 4%
Spec. Inv.
Training
Lega! Coun.
sar i:
:

explained that the FBI repres al

1 - Mr. Wannall

%

was not intended to inhibit any

b2Ale CEFF GIS 5

1- Mr. Cregar
1 - Mr. Hotis
1 - Mr. Daly
1 - Mr. Mintz
d (7)
8 4 JUN4 1 “yen .v

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page

B JUN 11 1975

Caneel! metencmee pemusencreed

CONTINUED - OVER

’


. ® @

Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

interview he might have, but was there for the purpose of expediting the
interview by resolving questions concerning information he was authorized
to furnish.

Mr. Armstrong said he fully understood and that he would
advise me in the event an interview was scheduled.

RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

nue Gv

NW 85296 Docid:32989508 Page 91

Gait
ee Rg .
. OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 5010—306 eee

oe MAY 1962 EDITION °
. (GSA GEN. we NO. 27 @ @ —
“GNITED STATES C@ERNMENT Aesoe ie =
Dep. re
Memorandum wate
Comp. Sy te
TO: Mr. Cochran/ DATE: 5/19/75 Files @ Com
Cine Vie Inv.
Ident.

Plon. & E

. x oOo Spec. Inv.
SUBJECT: SECURITY SURVEYS ~- SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON a a
[NTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ~ HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE Yet me

7, | .
ae ee ne . Inspection
PROM : W. HE. Harwar ia Intell. >
[@ Laboratory, al

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES - CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT Dinette Sec'y

Rememos Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams dated 4/9/75 and 4/25/15 »
concerning above-captioned matter, copies attached. of

ym,

Liaison with Capitol Hill by the Office of Legal Counsel resulted
in an arrangement whereby Laboratory representatives could meet with those
members of the Capitol Police Force handling security surveys for the.
U.S. Congress. Laboratory ‘personnel met with members of the Capitol ‘Police
Force of 5/6/75 and 5/8/75 at their headquarters, 331 First Street, NE,
Washington, D. C. At the meeting on 5/6/75 an examination of their survey
eguipment revealed that it was adequate, however it did not meet the ievel
of sophistication or quality available at thé present state of the art.
Further discussion revealed that the training received by members of the
police force handling their responsibility was limited.

On 5/8/75 Laboratory Supervisors Wilbur G. Stevens and Joseph B.

Parsons met with Chief James M. Powell and some of his staff members which™
included Deputy Chief Garner, Captain Brannon, Head of the Investigative \
Unit, and Lieutenant Bell, Head of the Bomb Disposal Unit. The discussion ,
at this meeting centered around steps which could be taken to update their =
present security survey equipment as well as additional measures which

could be put into practice to enhance their technical expertise in this

area. Laboratory personnel furnished them with the names of manufacturers |
of additional survey equipment as well as suggestions as to the establish- %
ment of an in-house training program, NS

Enclosures (2) gs AO |

1 - Mr. Jenkins . - ox Up a |

lL - Mr. Adams REC 59 /, A - / / LPS - a |

i - Mr. Mintz (Attn: Mr. Bowers, Room 4509 JB)Y S |
1 - Mr. Wannall (Attn: Mr. Crégar; Room 4123 JEH) ;
lL - Mr. Cochran ees exes, ps
il -~ Mr. Harward CONTINUED - OVER O18 3
Mr. S -.
WEL Fe yerevens LLINFORMATIOH CONTAINED, Bp MAY BOT g
Le BREIN!S, TOL sy SIF x e a Fea we rv
(8) BA
7 Vi fo lee gp
ran (oh 6

rane

NW °F Goo Page 92


Sates ~ 7 ~ _
“ * a *
.
. .

~e

Memorandum W. E. Harward to Mr. Cochran

RE: SECURITY SURVEYS - SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE
ACTIVITIES - HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES -
CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT

At the conclusion of this conference, Chief Powell expressed
his sincere appreciation to the Bureau for the excellent help and

guidance extended to him and his staff in this matter of mutual interest,

and expressed the hope that he could call on us again in the event he
or his staff needed to tap our resevoir of knowledge. The Chief was
assured that we would be available if needed in this capacity.

It appears that the Capitol Police Force has been forced into
the untenable position of handling this responsibility for the Congress, |
and as a result are attempting to establish some degree of self-reliance
and outward credibility being completely inexperienced in this area of
technical expertise. Because of this, it is felt that the Bureau should
move cautiously in any continuing liaison with the Capitol Police
concerning security survey matters.

* RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that any continuing liaison with the
Capitol Hill Police Force be handled by mature and experienced
Special Agent Supervisors, who are completely familiar with security
survey matters.

we Ho “Ss VAS

Kye ye pen

NW 88296 Docid:32989508 Page 93


“wy

mig”
ete

gee
Be ae tt.
wh SL

Pos
°F

se
ae

_
ee

=
&
ere BI,
tsdisc-2xk, dy

Ee

4
<
‘
‘
it
”
a
»
oy
wee Ay
Ye u2
wns
’

J

32
ahs

we

Fp Fits St

Pree

Sa AINED
By OROP.

On

THON CO!

Id
ney
oe,
.
.

ISA
—

ALL INFOR
HERE!
DATE

se
te Fat Bane OF AS ate

sk gs
eis he

“3
vat

van
phe
wt

oy
¢
mo

7

%
"
Be

z.

ree
BIgi WO x

Ah pg

BE Gg) ad 1% Hea get ved ae

oe eaetinehiee ee ee ' Ns

32989508 Page 94

NW 60296 Docid


per oevertan, :
. . at) Be
ow ot a Pa a
; : oo  @ @ Ga Pm .
- Ca : ; ae : GA a fe & At Gt O ed de kr
i : “SF det Dobe ASG a)
_ abi Do, Gods. aA” ww
vf : ; ca Gy oO : ;
. a got os ct '
‘ ce : fad 4d dd “
, apt : . perme MES ET} of)
ae: : .
. _ : Nd ods Ol os 1
; ae “gc "g ft }
a t fe)
. ~~ ”
@ :
; ot
. . “~ es
.f wy
: he?
: ae a
la 40
Ui 4
“a es
1 ty] i)
. . we “
: : O rw)
q , wm
a yet t
. wl .
- eet m™
*
: ot
: Dae §
4 oO ~*
. a &
£3 ma
' . it he
i
. i oe
ra) ot
. 4,
Fal f
“ “4
I i a
ye a ar .
. , oo) ae gy" ag a
. » mt dhe ged 4 U a
a ; mt mt wl cm
- a) me fe seh ih rl o
fay ~y Ow Oo fhe
, By ia my" at es
_ wi H ty
AM : | * ty de ra ea
ot \ . se co fo]
aut : * eal ed 5) he ‘ Ea
. S fy thy Ge tes
: be { wip fi Os “
- a : oO, 2
. at ha tet foo ek QS 8
cg . od YY wt gf ral
uh oi aw a tla ag dove GH
+ rar ue : \ Q GG St at GO fe
. paar xa | ot ud CO eT Ok Oy WA ON a ae
; oy Seg te ; .
' =


Ain. 3, B, Adams in 250'TS A: [e-
Legal Conmesi i
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE :
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES LL FORMATION CONTAINED
HyiS y
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTES Wee /oLCO-F BY .

TNS INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Beference Lessl Counsel ia Mr. Adams memorandum of
¢ 2-38-73 to which the intelligents Division placed an addendum dated
§.34.75 showiny that Baderick Hilis, Counsel to the President, had
requested that the Sergeants at Arme of the Senate and House of
Representatives keep the Bureau advised regarding checks made for

-alectronic listening deviess in the offices of captioned Select Committees. ~~

This was diseuased on 4-23-74 by nSpector Beware with

Senate Sergeant at Arnis William Wanaell and his Deputy, Rebert Sough.

They were amenoble te hotiiying ae comceruing the checks they meke of
Sonate Select Commitiae space and the offiess of the Members al thig -
Commitee. Howh was desicnated by Wannell te handie this matter,
Soesk advised thet the special Capitol Peiice unit had made 2 check
of Room £145 in the Canitel on that date (4-23-98) prior to a meeting
of the Senate Seicet Commiltes in that room and found nothine. Hough
siated ther have received uo requests ohatever to make any checks af
the offices of individual Committee Members, He asid he had discuassd
this patter with William Miller, Steif Director of the Select Commities,
_ aad MRler indiesiad it would be taken up with the Committee but he has
heard nothing farther frors him.

- im 4-24-75 Bove ra discussed this mater with Sennsth _.--

Harding, Sergeant at Ayms of the House of Ronresentatives. Harding
stated he has had Bo nequests tor aay checks of the Members’ offices or

2» Bie, Adaras ~

_ ; pe Be. Wannall a
, Ye * Shite . “oe - ‘ i
ve Le Rae, Hits . os ;
i - Bie. Cregar :
i~ ix, Farringioa ,
iL» Mr, Sewers b2- Hie
oe 27S
BeBikis (8) comtinumn - OVER

NW 88296 Docid:32989508 Page 56

2


NW 88296 Docid:32989508 Page Sf

tegai Counsel io Mr. Adams Memo
BE: SEMATE SELECT COMBI PTEE
ON ISTEELINGENCE ACTIVITIES

HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEES
OW INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

epaee of the House Select Committee since the Communities really hag mot
begun te funetions as vel. He said he bax discussed this matter with
Committee Chairman imeien Redsi, sad be.certainiy will give us
complete accounting af checks they mals of this Committea’s space and
ihe space of the individual Members af the Committees,

PECOBRAIENDA TION:
Yor information..


6k-)16395- 2/3

CHANGED 10

b62-)/6464¥- +

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

ar REM OT By FO. A LM lia

a oe
<)

| NW 88296 Docld:32589588 Page 58


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 - 5010r106
ae sone @ 6
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Assoc. ‘Diy

\ Memorandum sestwed)

Admin, ——__.
Comp. Syst, —_
Ext. Affairs ——

\~ : Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 5/23/75 Files & Com.

\ . Gen. Inv. ———
( FROM : Legal Couns eae —

Laboratory ___.
Plon. & Evol. —

Spec. Inv.
Trginin:
digs ie

Rm. —

sunec( SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE | oN
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES; ary inFORMATION Pilla >

a MEPS ITT

INTERVIEWS OF FBI EMPLOYEES HERE NS
OR FORMER EMPLOYEES DATE

iT.

ree iy

At the Executives Conference on May 22, 1975, I presented fo
discussion the question of the procedures to be followed when former employees
or current employees of thé Bureau are contacted for interview by staff
representatives of the Senate Select Committee, or are called for testimony
pursuant to a subpoena issued by the Committee. I explained the background
including the numerous attempts to arrive at a working arrangement with
the Committee in terms of stated guidelines and that all such efforts in the
past had proven unworkable.

I pointed out that when presented with the proposal that an agency
representative be present during interviews, the Committee met and voted
unanimously to reject that proposal. The issue of whether the agency
representative would be present during the interview therefore is a stumbling
block to the development of a reasonable procedure to be followed by th
Committee and by our present and former employees. I requestéd the
authority of the Executives Conference and approval of the Director to,
the requirement that a Bureau representative be present during interviews
and following a vote such approval was given.

I then requested authority to undertake the development of a
working understanding with the Committee in behalf of the Bureau by which
we would be given notice of the idantities of persons to be interviewed prior to
interview or testimony, that we would be advised of the subject matter of the

1 - Mr. Callahan

1- Mr. Adams
1 - Mr. Jenkins R
1 - Each Assistant Director £C-10g Ss 7
1- Mr. Mintz 1 - Mr. Hotis— (y 2--// 6S a
JAM:mfd iv
, CONTINUED -
> 4] INUED - OVER _
#7 JUN 10 1975

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 99

nee Re


© . g
— _!

Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee, etc.

interview or testimony, and afforded an opportunity to discuss with the
witness those areas of the proposed interview or testimony which would
require no special arrangements and those areas which would require the
information possessed by the witness to be furnished to members of the
Committee or to the Chairman exclusively.

We also wanted an opportunity prior to interview to furnish the
witnesses information concerning their Constitutional rights, their rights
pursuant to the Committee's rules, and to advise them concerning the extent
to which they were released from obligations of secrecy made to the FBI, and
to the procedures necessary to obtain authority of the Department to respond
to a subpoena.

Following discussion and vote this matter also was approved.

Pursuant to such authority, I met with K. William O'Connor,
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, from approximately 4:00 p.m. to 5:20 p.m.
on May 22, 1975, accompanied by Inspector John B. Hotis. I explained to
Mr. O'Connor that the Director was desirous of having the Committee under-
stand that the FBI wanted to be cooperative to the extent that it was possible
and consistent with the need to protect the identities of informants, sensitive
sources of information and methods, on-going investigations and other current
operations and personal privacy. Because of this tiew of the Director and the
Bureau, we desired to make known to the Committee the fact that we would
not insist on the presence of a Bureau representative during actual interviews
of testimony of present or former employees, but we would want an under-
standing with the Committee and the Committee staff that the Bureau would
be given prior notice of the identities of proposed witnesses, the subject
matter of the proposed interview or testimony, and an opportunity prior to
interview or testimony for the Bureau to consult with the employee in order
to release him from his obligations of secrecy to the extent possible for
purposes of the interview or testimony.

T restated our position that we were not endeavoring to deter
testimony rather we were attempting to facilitate testimony under reasonable
eonditions and we felt that these matters should be discussed with the
Committee. I told Mr. O'Connor tht we were aware of the numerous
discussions, proposals and conferences that have been held in an effort
to establish specific formal guidelines with the Committee, but that all such
efforts in behalf of the White House staff and the intelligence community at

~2- CONTINUED - OVER

NW 68296 Docid:329989588 Page 100


@ , @

Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee, etc.

large have not been successful. I told him that therefore we felt it would
be appropriate for the FBI to express our view fo the Committee because
interviews of FBI personnel and former employees have been conducted
and are scheduled in the near future.

Mr. O'Connor said that he understood the Director's view that
he desired to cooperate with the Committee and he felt that such cooperation
could be negotiated if we were to offer the Committee as trading material
COINTELPRO files. I told Mr. O'Connor that we were not going to negotiate
an understanding concerning witness interview procedures on the basis of
trading any of our files. He then suggested that we negotiate the May 14,
1975, letter which was addressed to the Attorney General by Senator Church
and use that negotiation as a basis for trdding with the Committee to develop
workable guidelines. I again told Mr. O'Connor that I considered the question ~
of procedural arrangements for witness inerviews to be a very broad question and .
one that went far beyond the requests in the May 14, 1975, letter. I told him
that I felt confident that the May 14, 1975, letter would be followed by perhaps
an even longer letter with more requests and that such matters should be
negotiated individually.

Mr. O'Connor then said that it was his strong view that a letter
should be addressed to the Committee complaining of the treatment of FBI
witnesses, particularly regarding violations of the Committee's own rules
in that it appeared that during recent interviews the Committee had not
furnished witness a copy of the rules in sufficient time and the treatment by
staff representatives (& the Committee staff of witnesses had been improper.

I told Mr. O'Connor that I thought that our efforts to develop
a working relationship with the Committee could be seriously impaired at
this time should a protest letter be sent to Senator Church because a formal
communication of that nature would require some reaction on the part of the
Committee and I could see no benefit to our present efforts to establish
procedures by which we could reasonably cooperate with the Committee.

Mr. O'Connor then suggested that a letter might be addressed
to Senator Church which described our concern that in the absence of
reasonable procedures witnesses' rights might be impaired and that for that

-3- CONTINUED - OVER

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 104


Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

reason and for the reason that the Director desired to be cooperative with
the Committee, we would request a meeting with Senator Church and
Senator Tower to arrive at an understanding as to procedures. I told
Mr. O'Connor that I would consider such a letter anne Would discuss
the matter with the Deputy Attorney General and with James Wilderotter
at the White House.

At approximately 9:05 a.m. on May 23, 1975, Mr. O'Connor
called me and said that he had discussed the matter with Mr. Wilderotter
and the Deputy Attorney General. He said that both had agreed that it was
inopportune at this time to seek special guidelines for interviews of FBI
personnel and former personnel with the Committee. He said that a meeting
has been scheduled for Tuesday, May 27, 1975, at noon in a final
effort to resolve an understanding with Committee representatives. He
said at the present time it is proposed that the meeting be attended by
Wilder otter and Roderick Hills, representing the White House; Hoffman,
representing the Defense Department; Warner, representing CIA; and
O'Connor representing the Justice Department. Committee representatives
would be Schwarz, Chief Counsel, and John Elliff. He said that at this
time it was his thought that the Deputy Attorney General and I should not
attend the meeting. He gave as his reasoning the thought that "should
something go wrong" the Deputy Attorney General could disassociate himself
from any agreement arrived at, and that I would similarly be in a position
of saying that we have not been a party to the agreement.

I reminded Mr. O'Connor that meetings have been held frequently
in the past and that tentative understandings made at such meetings have dis~
appeared shortly after the meeting was concluded. I told him that was
significant to us because we now understand that two more former
employees of the FBI have been contacted and may be interviewed in the
near future. I told him that former SA Sam Papich and former Agent Nichols
have been contacted. I told him that the extent to which we should release
these two former employees from their obligation of secrecy could not be
intelligently evaluated unless we::knew the subject matter of the interviews
and that we plan to contact the Committee to inquire as to the subject
matter. I pointed out to him that such pending interviews make it imperative
for the FBI to consider action in addition to meetings that may be planned |
to discuss guidelines.

-4 - CONTINUED OVER

NW 68296 Docid:32989588 Page 102


Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

Mr. O'Connor asked that we not contact the Committee directly
at this time, but that we allow him to call John Elliff and Schwarz to “
request that he be advised of the identity of all proposed FBI witnesses
and of the subject matter of the proposed interviews, and that such inter-
views or testimony not go forward pending developments of an agreement
on guidelines. O’Connor promised that he would make the contact promptly
and advise me today of the results. I agreed to withhold our contact
pending receipt of the information from him.

Mr. O'Connor then insisted that a letter be prepared for the
Attorney General to send to Senator Church pointing out the failure of the
Commiitee to afford complete protection of the rights of witnesses. I
declined to undertake that responsibility and I told him the reason was that
a formal document addressed to the Chairman of the Committee would tend
to impair our efforts to negotiate with the Committee and certainly would be
untimely in view of the conference he described as being scheduled for next
Tuesday at noon.

Mr. O'Connor then said he would hate to have to tell the Deputy
Attorney General that the FBI declined to prepare such a draft. I told him
that not only would I not mind him telling the Deputy Attorney General, but
I wished he would tell the Deputy Attorney General and explain my reason
for not sending such a formal letter addressed to Senator Church at this
time. Mr. O'Connor said that "well everyone else agrees to the letter, "'
and I told him the FBI:does not agree.

Mr. O'Connor said that if he was going to have to draft the
letter for the Attorney General's signature, he would do it, but that he would
need the information concerning the interviews of former SA Devlin and
former SA Sentinella. I told Mr. O'Connor that the information concerning
Sentinella was en route to him already and that we would endeavor to
furnish him as promptly as possible any additional information available
to us concerning these interviews.

At 11:13 a.m. on May 23, 1975, Mr. O'Connor called me and
said that he had just concluded a conversation with John ELliff during which
Elliff agreed that in regard to the scheduled interview of former SA Sam Papich
on May 29, 1975, at 9:00 a.m., he would furnish us the substance of the

~5- CONTINUED ~ OVER

NW 88296 Docid:32969508 Page 103

@ _ @

Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

questions to be asked Mr. Papich. He said that Elliff was agreeable to

an informal arrangement under which the FBI would not require the
presence of a Bureau representative at such interviews, but would expect
to receive the identity of persons to be interviewed plus a statement as to
the subject matter of the interview. Elliff then proceeded to identify as
those persons scheduled for interview as William Turner, who will be
interviewed today or this weekend by Mike Epstein at San Francisco, and
"Chick" Brennan, who was interviewed yesterday, May 22, 1975, by Mark
Gitenstein and who may be interviewed again today.

As to the interview of Sam Papich, Elliff said that the interview

would concern:
1.
2.
3.

4,

A liaison agreement between the FBI and CIA;
The abolition of Papich's liaison responsibilities in 1970;
Dissatisfaction by the FBI with the Huston Plan;

The views in the White House regarding the intelligence

community and the FBI with reference to a conversation Elliff had with
Mr. Wannall and Mr. Cregarn on May 22, 1975;

5.
6.

A detailed follow-up on the discussions with Mr. Wannall.

A copy of the Huston Plan and certain minutes taken of

meetings at which the Huston Plan was discussed. These minutes allegedly
were made by William Cregar;

7.

The matter raised with Paul Daly on May 22, 1975. (Mr. Daly

recalled that Mr. ELliff discussed an incident concerning the CIA and the
FBI which occurred at Denver, Colorado. )

Mr. O'Connor said that an interview proposed with former
SA Nichols has been postponed indefinitely according to Elliff because
of Nichols’ unavailability.

-~6- CONTINUED - OVER

NW 58296 Docid:32989568 Page 104


NW 88296 Dochd:32969508 Page 105

Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

Mr. O'Connor noted that even though formal car cext rules
have not been agreed upon with the Committee, it appears that Ellift's
cooperation in furnishing the above information indicates a willingness
to abide by the terms and conditions that I had requested Mr. O'Connor
to seek in behalf of the FBI.

In this developing cooperation with Elliff, it is my opinion that .
we should not participate in the conference at noon on Tuesday, May 27, 1975,
at which time the broad proposals by Wilderotter will be discussed. Itis
to the interest of the FEI to develop a cooperative attitude on the part of
Elliff and his staff and that is being accomplished.

RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

(ir

a/*


OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10
MAY 198: Y
GSA FPR (41 CFR) 1OT—34.6

J | UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
\e Memorandum
/ TO : Mr. J. B. Adams

a

FROM Legal Counse

(Cay
SUBJECT: / SENSTUDY 75

oe

K. William O'Connor, Special Counsel to the Deputyy4 /
Attorney General for Entelligence Coordination, advised that 4727,
he desired the Bureau to continue practice of furnishing
communications setting forth the contents of interviews of
former and current employees where such information is

He also requested that the Bureau continue to
furnish an extra copy for James Wilderotter, assistant to

available.

. Assoc. Dir. ___
Dep. ee
Dep. 7

Asst. Dir,

Admin,

Comp. Syst. —_
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com. —
Gen. Inv.
Ident.
Inspection

- Intell.
( yey 7

igen S
™ Pldn. & Evol. —
Spec. Inv.

Training

DATE: 6-2-75

Telephone Rm. —
Director Sec’y

79;

7

the Counsel to the President.

RECOMMENDATION :

For information.

aa ABM PLD

1 —~ Mr. Wannali.
1 - Mr. Cregar
Ll —- Mr. Mintz

iL - Mr. Hotis

1 - Mr. Daly

Y

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINER \
} i

ar aa Leora ok
=btG BY

a

woody [e222 Bl
-- Pir al °

a7 Jun 10 1978


: hal

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 e 5010=106
GSA GEN. REO. NO. 27 >
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT . Assoc. Dir.
Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep. AD Inv. __
_ Memorandum Asst Dirt
Admin,
Comp. Syst. —_
| TO : Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 5/28/75 mae Aes —
Gen. Inv.
Ident.
Wy Inspegsion.
FROM: T.egal Counsel; ett hte.

Laboratory
Plan. & Eval, _
see Ie

Trai in

Director, Ly y—
At 10:37 a.m. on May 28, 1975, former FBI employee /§

Daniel M. (Mac) Armstrong, II, telephonically advised me that he has received

information that the Senate Select Committee may contact him for purpose of

interview. He le requested my advice as to what his response should be. I

told Mr. Armstrong that he should be aware of any secrecy agreements

he may have signed while an employee of the FBI and he should be aware of

the Attorney General Order 501-73. I told him the Director was interested

in being as candid as possible with the Committee and that we would be

willing to release him from his agreement to the extent it would be possible

to do so consistent with the needs of on-going investigations and the sensitivity

of the particular information. involved. I told him thatshould he receive a

request for interview or subpoena, it would be appropriate for him to inquire

as to the general areas of discussion proposed for the interview and to

request the Director to release him from the secrecy agreement conce
those areas.

oe,

sunyeer SENATE VATE SELECT COMMITTEE |
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

nares A MASE ALC IAM

ut
Ss Mr. Armstrong said that if he was contacted, he would respond
according to the advice furnished him. “4

2S

afi RECOMMENDATION: ALL INFORMATIZN N CONTAINED ',

rs rere sp bid UNZ newegen

= For information.

mea

=e

> 2

aD. O&

Sa

1 - Mr. Wannall J. ey” | or on
1- Mr. Cregar —fffa% FS y)
1 - Mr. Hotis REC-t09 _ a UL 2 /2.

aor CuoaTma
1 - Mr. Daly ~ -
1 - Mr. Mintz I JUN LO {Nt

ego 3

JAM:mfd : a
OT _ by?

a ; & “y
( punk Ree. UNIT

" NRyi@ PH PLAIN _
Vaio PM 6-5-75-NITEL MCA
TO DIRECTOR (62-116395)

_ FROM: HILADELPHIA (62-@-23222)

Ss = NSTUDY 75

FEDERAL BUREAU OF wera
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

pew

TELETYPE

BUREAU NITEL, MAY 28, 1975,

SA JOHN B. MEADE ADVISED TELEPHONICALLY MAY 29, 1975

RE CONTENTS OF RENITEL.

PERSONNEL RECORDS UNIT

COPY RETAINED IN

mt is ore
wee

re

oneal

a eae

ic.

Assoc. Dir,
Dep.-A.D.-Adm.
Dep.-A.D.-Iny.___

{ Asst. Dir: F
} Admin, ___
Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs __.
] Files & Com. __ ff
y Gen. Inv.
Ident. = f
Inspection _,»-_|t

Plan. & Eval. _
Spee, Inv.
Training __.
Legal Coun,
Telephone Rm. ._
Director 5 See’ yo

ee

7» DOS

nit host! Bolid.sihise0 Page 108

FEDERAL PULAU OF INVESTIGATION
COMMUL CATIONS SECTION

i)

1 ' 72
ve ARAL CE oth.
} 8:33PM NITEL JUNE 5, 1975 KCL [EEE TY DE

DIRECTOR (62-116395)

FROM CHARLOTTE (62-4993)
SENSTUNY 75

REBUNITEL MAY 29, 1975,

MR. JOSEPH A. SIZOO, 84 A PINE CRESCFNT,

PINES, NC, CONTACTED MAY 29,

IN PFRUNITEL.
' END
MER FETHS CLR AN TKS™

—-"

TERSONNEL RECORDS UNIT

COPY RETAINED Iv

8.4 UNL 1 7.

ALL INFORM,
src Wapee

WHISPFRING

1975 PER INSTRUCTIONS SET FORTH

NYAINGH ace.)

ew 4

Dep,-A.D.-Adt._.,

4 Dep-A.D,-Inv,__.
| Asst, Dir.:
) Admin.
# Comp. Syst. —_
4 Ext. Affairs
1 Files & Com. —_
4 Gen. Inv, .
# Ident.
R Inspection Ava
| Inte My

panne

| Plan & Eval. _
f Spee Inv. .
Training
{ Legal Coun,
j Telephone Rm. .. di
Dirgetor See’y __ }
et¥ Teed


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTY

COMMUNICATIONS SECSIIN
way 120 ory 62

1345 P M URGENT MAY 69, 1975 LJAa TEL ey
TOs DIRECTOR (62-116395) RE
FROM? PORTLAND (66-2) ax We
> ATTENTION 3 LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION ay i?

SENSTUDY 75.
RE FBIHQ NITEL TO ALEXANDRIA AND OTHER OFFICES, INCLUDING

PORTLAND, MAY 28, 1975.

yw FRIH@ NITEL NAMED SA LEO B. APP, JR», AND SA EDGAR O.}

= Hea ee cremmeammmmmnmnnciiaiecsensiiie S eaiintneineeuneeiel
INGELLS , BOTH CURRENTLY ASSIGNED TO PORTLAND DIVISION, AND
w =D THEY MAY BE INTERVIEWED BY SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC),
Be, SUBJECT MATTERS FOR INTERVIEWS UNKNOWN,

pate ft
ae FOR INFORMATION OF FBIHQ, STRONG POSSIBILITY SUBJECT MATTER-Y\

En AINS TO MATTER ENUMERATED IN DETAIL IN PORTLAND TELETYPES
0 FBIHQ JANUARY 18, 19755 FEBRUARY 1, 1973, FEBRUARY 5, 1973,
-PORTLAND AIRTEL Td FeIH, JANUARY 19, 1973, IN MATTER ENTITLED ©

se

“FBI INTELLIGENCE LETTER FOR THE PRESIDENT, CODE NAME “*INLET’,

RESEARCH MATTER." REG 100,

END. cu mn iN b- Ub 2 — Ah
5 As) | ~ WH LO 1979

-e |

ALL INPOAMETION CONTAINED KO
HERE is ES Pp ssite i
DATE BY Sy y


Assoc. Dir, |

+ @ ,
° : ‘ SADE, BUEN GF INVESTIGATION ®

Dep.-A.D.-Adm._.. §
- (ONHURIGATIONS SECTION Doped Detnv—
. : = . , Admin. ..... fi
ee | Su athe —|
f . * ay _ { Files & Com. j
5 = “PE 1 Gen. Inv. —.-—
WR@%4 TP CODE \ 4 —s —|
. ; “a |
1:49PM URGENT JUNE 5, 1975 JFD in |

Spec. Inv.
Training .
Legal Coun. - }
Yelephone Rm. ..#
Director Sec’y —_. ;

TO DIRFCTOR (62116395) —

a INFOR MATION Sr ALY

NOS | Tov ROG:
fare edhe

RF BURFA'W NITEL MAY 28, i975.

‘SENSTUNY 75

ON JUNE 4, 1975, MICHAFL J. ROZAMUS, 65 GILF DRIVF,
HOLMFS RFACH, FLORIDA, WAS CONTACTFD, MR, ROZAMUS HAN NOT
PEEN AVAILABLE FOR CONTACT (NTL THIS DATF BFCANSF OF TRAVFL.
MR. ROZAMUS ADVISED THAT HE HAS NOT RFFN CONTACTED BY ANY
REPRFSFNTATIVES OF THF SFNATE SFLECT COMMITTEE RUT HE was
ALERTFD THAT HE MAY PF APPROACHFD BY A MEMBER OF THF COMMITIFF
STAFF, MR, ROZAMUS WAS ANVISED OF THE CONTENTS OF RERINITEL

CONCERNING THE FACT THAT HE MAY REQUEST THAT AN FRI AGENT
BE PRESENT DURING INTERVIEW IN THE EVENT AIESTIONS ARE ASKEN

RELATING TO SENSITIVE BUREA'] OPFRATIONS. MR. ROZAMUS WAS ALSO \)
- :
ABV ISED THAT AS A PRELIDE TO THe INTERVIFW HE MAY CONTACT

Ig BUREAU’S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CaLL. HE Was

ets THAT THE BURFAU'S OFFFR OF ASSISTANCE WAS NOT INTFNDFD

Sn PAGE ONE en |

"IN LQ 1975

» . - Eee)


PAGE TWO

TO IMPEDE THE WORK OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE BIT was DONE AS A
COOPERATIVE GESTURE AND TO SAFEGUARD SENSIT IVF BREA
INFORMATION, MR. ROZAMUS ADVISED THAT HE “AS AWARE OF THIS
AND FULLY APPRFCIATED THE BUREAITS EFFORT S IN THIS RFGARD.
MR, ROZAMUS FURTHER ANVISED THAT HF WOULD NOTIFY THF TAMPA
OFFICE IN THE EVENT THAT HF IS CONTACTEN BY A RFPRESENTAT IVE
OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE.

END

RECD THREE

DCW FBIHQ CL CLR

ce fier

| NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 112


€

Airtel

i\
¥ To: Legat, Rome
A From:
@ ke per
,, SENSTUDY 75
ae

Director, FBI

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams
2-MMr. J. A. Mintz

(1-Mr. J. B, Hotis)
6/2/75

1 - Me. W. R. Wanna L/
1 - Me. V. Kolombgp YES

PERSONAL ATTENTION ?

4c
(Route through for, i :
1- Me. W. 0. Cregar

x7)

he

Agsoc. Dir. “Hit
Dep. AD Adm. _
Dep. AD Inv. __

Asst, Dir.;

Admin,
Comp. Syst.
Ext, Affairs
Files & Com. __
Gen. Inv.

Ident.
Inspection
Intell.

hee Minguitges made of field offices and action to take if contacted.

1 - M.S. F. Phillips
Enclosed is a copy of Bureau teletype 5/28/75 to
selected SACs and one copy éach of Bureau teletypes 5/2 and
20/75 to all SACs, latter two teletypes for background infor-
mation concerning captioned matter,

You will note that the Senate Select Committee (SSC) .
is interested in the whereabouts of some current employees of;
your office, including yourself, For your additional ce)
mation, an SSC Staff Member recently inquired of a former '\f
Bureau official concerning communications sent to Legat, © y
Rome, in 1964 concerning Martin Luther King, Jr., and concern-
ing the name of the Legat at Rome in 1964, (It was the errone-

ous recollection of the former Bureau official that Armand
Cammarota was the Legat. in Rome in 1964),

F _ LG SOU
Handle all inquiries POO he ber adage +

with the enclosed instructions. j

AUL INFORMATION CONTAINED,
Enclosures - 3 KEREHYIS GNALASSIFI ve yp

SFP sek ¢,) DATE £ BY —— pal °
(10)
NOTE: Enclosed J3Mp/ 519261 [to all offices gave general back-

ground as to Senbtudy 75.,and alerted field that former and
indgitinben£ employéés might~be-eontacted for interview by SSC
Staff. Enclosed 5/20/75 tel alerted all SACs to possible

SSC letter” 5/14/75 enclosed a request for names and current
office assignments or last known addresses of all FBI employees
assigned Rome, 1964. Three employees then assigned there are
still in Rome and their names are included in the copy of the
5/28/75 teletype being sent Rome. That teletype included
instructions for selected offices to alert additional 1964 Rome
employees who are now assigned elserhers-cf ng longer with FBI.

Laboratory ¥VA
Plon. & Eval. — fen y .
sess Inve i, nA We. Vhe/— if ey
Legal Coun boos ° &
Telephone Rm. ~ f ut PLM /
ce. toyfepiy MAIL ROOM (2! ‘PeLETYPE UNIT (7) GPO 924546
viaalide Dodid 32%e9588 Page 113

: ‘Assoc, Dir. weecerinne
y Dep-A.D.-Adm_. q
4 Dep-A.D,-InVenmcoam i
a Asst, Dir:
Admin. .._.
Comp. Syst,
, Ext. Affairs 74
Files & Com. — 3
! Gen. Iny. Ve nm |
; Tent,

é FEDEPa VUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

/ COMLURATIONS SECTION
I JNO 5 B75

-
° “Reet

\ L <
\NR 005 NK CODE PES yRr

Af
12:00PM IMMEDIATE JUNE 5, 1975 JCG

Laboratory

j Plan. & Bval,
{ Spee, Inv.
y Training _.-!
i Legal Coun, ..—

4 Telephone Rm. ae
| Director“Hég’y ___

SENSTUDY 75 od oa.
~ q A i ,
RE BUTEL way 28, 1975, 2%! WY

FORMER AND PRESENT EMPLOYEES LISTED IN RE BUTEL HAVE

10 DIRECTOR (62-116395)

FROM NEWARK (66-3971)

BEEN CONTACTED AND ALERTED TO POSSIBILITY OF INTERVIEWS BY
SC STAFF MEMBERS. FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
SET OUT IN BUTEL MADE KNOWN TO THESE EMPLOYEES, NONE OF

WHOM HAS BEEN CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF AS YET.

RE SUCH SSC CONTACT.

BUREAU WILL BE ADVISED SHOULD THEY CONTACT THIS OFFICE Oy

MATION ( CON TAME.
“ Se

pane

FLS HOLD HAVE ONE MORE Y FOR YOU "REP-109

2116273303

% JUN 9 1975
TERE MNABUEUETIS

% OJUN 101975

, C, /oet ene Moe
NW | Dochd:329895388 Page 114


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27

1010=106 6
UNITED STATES . ee . Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. _

Memorandum cree

Comp, Syst. —__

We Mr. J. B. Adams pare: 6/5/75 Pilve & Cams
{ on
("rROM Legal Couns Gr spe aT

: teeny ——

sumer: gma Te SELECT COMMITTEE ON Seca
INTELLIGENCE SCTNEUES ean

prior to the interview. na
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED
RECOMMENDATION: HEREIN IS UNGLASSIF I
as DATE PBL BY
\, aye’ N That the Intelligence Division make available ‘an appropriate
| representative to contact Mr. Armstrong (telephone number 632-6990)

“ale

uy)

LPs
ra 5

- ?

fe

7 @IUN 1.0 1975

telephonically advised me that he is scheduled to be interviewed at

to be available fore consultation during the interview. I told Mr. Armstrong

NW G8296 Dockd22589588 Page 115

7 Dirgetor See'y __

as 4. |
At 11:44 a.m. on June 5, 1975, Daniel M. Armstrong, II, \

10:00 a.m. on June 6, 1975, in Room 308 of the Néw Senate Office
Building by Mark Gitenstein. He requested a Bureay representative

that T would make appropriate arrangements and that the individual who
would be available would contact him to make necessary arrangements

and to accompany him to the above-described interview.

1 - Mr. Wannall ,
1- ‘Mr. Cregar ia

1 - Mr. Hotis

1 - Mr. Daly
1l- Mr. Mintz -
Q- —_# oo
elas 08’
JAM:mtd “ -_
(7) laine -_ BS in 9 1975

ut jee meee meee

\
t,
ow


Assoc. Dir. __.. 98
Dep. AD Adm. 2

Dep. AD Inv.

Asst. Dir
Admin, :
Comp. syh —
Ext. Affairs
Ete:

+ tiny’
Ident.
Inspection
Intell.

Laborctory ___
Plan. & Eval. —
Spec. Inv.
Training
Legal Coun. %
Teldehonfee

Director Sec'y

NW 88796 Docldg

“'YENQLOSUBE IN BULKY B00:

Nd 175

~ tes. J. McDermott
(Al H. R. Hauer)
-~ Mr. dg. A. Mintz
(L - Mr. J. B. Hotis)
- Mr. W. HM. Mooney
(Attn: J. E. Reilly)
~ Mr. W. R. Wannall

fos

.
.

Be oN

fhe Attorney General May 22, 1975

ial

- My. W. 0. Cregar

Dixector, FBI ~ Mr. H. W. Dare, dx.

L

6)
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMUTTER
ON ELNTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
cnet AAR AOC NS CLE ay
: . )
© yy? y

Reference ig made to memorandum from Senate Select
Committee dated April 30, 1975, and appendices thereto,
requesting certain ddéciimants and other information from the
FBI.

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the
Cormittee is the original of a memorandum dated May 22, 1975,
"RE: .FILING_SYSTEH,"” one copy of a document captioned "FBI
indexing Procedures® which concerns the FBI's filing system
and one copy cach of 13 Tables of Contents for FBI forms.

A copy of this memorandum with enclosures is being
provided for your records.

Enclosures (30) HERR ORMATION
: Ss

Lert sat

Dire ya) ae

62116395 By
HWD/SFP : ome Ws i
(10 er nr
) ” \ #

+, “ERATE
a” haw s a manly

;

Ce.

. Hae ee
[yea SP b

BS jue a 1078

re
~~

ae
“5 1

tate t
‘e

yeh

f
gfe

oa
yl

MAIL ROOM cA ; TELETYPE UNIT (__]
Page 116

GFO : 1975 © - 569-920

NS ‘ F ws to ws


Lf 1- x 4 . J. McDermott
(AMM: BH. R. Hauer)
2- Mr. J. A. Mintz
(l - Mr. J. B. Hotis)
1 - Mr. W. M. Mooney
(Attn: J. E. Reilly)
1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall
1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

62-116395 May 22, 1975

L- Mr. H. W. Dare, Jr.

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
£O STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE: PILING SYSTEM ayy INFORMATION aed
HEREIN BUYS
DATE MEL (Ors oY WOOL
Reference is made to memorandum from captioned
Committee dated April 30, 1975, and the appendices thereto,

which contained requests for documents and other information
from the FEI.

In connection with Part four, concerning the FBI's
filing system and printed forms utilized by this Bureau,
enclosed are copies of the following:

1. Undated nine~page memorandum captioned "FBI
Indexing Procedures.”

2, One copy each of 13 Tables of Contents
concerning forms utilized by this Bureau.

Concerning Bh SBE" filing system and_the Committee's
requests for a so-called ie evk's Manual:" and for a list of

PRE classifications used in its filing system, lt will be
noted that the nine-page memorandum contains the list of clas~
sifieations. With respect te the so~called "Clerk's Manual,"
the Files and Communications Division of the FBI maintains
detailed instructions which are followed by its employees in
classifying mail for indexing. It is not known whether such
instructions are what is referred to by the Committee as the

asco. ds, “Clerk’s Manual." These instructions consist of nine volumes

Dep. ADAM. GE Material. Because of their bulkiness and because it'is not

rei — clear whether this material would serve the Committee's purpose,

Admin. ~ it is not being furnished at this time. However, it will be

Comp. Sys. QVaLlable for review at PBI a the Committee Staff.

Files & com

Gen. mv... HWD/SEP ¢ one py

Inegeelion == (10 SEE NOTE PAGE 2 WY, 6 .
att

Tveoreony — Phis document is prepated in response to sor rogues st and is not for dissemi- Ley

Plan. & Eval. — notion ovisice your Cainmittea, Its’ Lmiind to official proceedings by on

Spec. Inv. ——— gor Commitéce and the conten’! may not ‘be dis.ivsed to unauthorized. person- |

Training uel. 2 the express appraval of the FBI . of iia) Of. “

Lega! Coun. —__ [£2 a Bas

paetnene MAIL ROOME] = TELETYPE UNIT CU {47 2 x -f, 2D =

was ‘Gpo: 1975 © - 569-920

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 117 ERE OSURE _


PILING SYSTEi

The following will explain the Tables of Contents
concerning FBI forms which are being furnished in lieu of the
actual forms at thig time. This procedure igs being followed
because the forms number nearly 2,006 and many will prohably
be of no interest to the Committee. If the Committec will
roview these Tablea of Contents and advise which forms it
desires to see, appropriate stems will then be taken to mate
them available to the Committca Staff. “Whe Tables of Contents
headed "FBI Form Book" lists all FBI FD (Field Division) forms
which are in use throughout the field. The remaining Tables
of Contents list those forms applicable to the work of snecific
FBI Divisions at Headquarters. Yor examnle, forms with tho
prefix "1" are used in Division One (Identification); those
with profis "2" are used in Division Tvo (fraining); ote.
there are no forms peculiar te Divisions 11 (Legal Counsel)
and 13 (Office of Planning and Svaluation)., These forms with
prefix "O" (omnibus) are for use by two or more Divisions at
Hoadquarters.

.

L - The Attorney General

NOTE:

Clearance for waking these Yables of Contents available
vas obtained from the Training Division for the FD forms and
from each Division for its applicable forms. ‘The Files and
Communications Division has cleared the paper “FBI Indexing
Procedures."

e

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 118


5-140 (Rev, 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

" Addressee: vo:
, Cure (XILHM [yMemo (CyReport dated__5/22/75 sis

| Caption United States Senate Select Committee to

Study Governmental Operations with |

Respect to Intelligence Activities

Re: Filing System

Originating Offi oy;

| Delivered b:

‘ Received by:

Title: iif
Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI '

ode

ALL INFORLIATION CONTAINED

See PROPS!

bo -{C G SAsz 30
ares emesis roger —_ Spon FE


G2- 6
cine 6

Herel INFORMATION CONTAINED
ERE! yah AyASSI
BY eg

NW 88296 Dochd:32969508 Page 120

TO

i) FROM

d ran tev
:H.C, Flemister, Jr. Ker Rr ie

SUBJECT: CLEARANCE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY _ eee gee

;

orfionai FORM NO. 10 5010-106

MAY 1942 EDITION . . 5

GSA GEN, REC, NO, 27 . J

UNITED STATES VERNMENT ~ (7 Assoc. Dire
at Dep. AD Adm. _

Memorandum eee

Admin.

Comp. Syst. .

:Mr. WR. Wannal lye te DATE: 5/12/75 Ext. Affairs —_

a Files & Com.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval.

THE INTERDEPARTMENTAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE qoese
(IIC) FOR RELEASE TO THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

a a Re

Director Sec’y

The following is to record the clearance of publ +
certain documents prepared by the IIC and, in some instances|,

the inter departmerege Committee on Internal Security (ICIS)

for release to the-Senate Select Committee (SSC). . . mg

a
amy

ats;
The SSC has been furnished a paper prepared by es
the Intelligence Division which was a position paper on

the FBI's jurisdiction in internal security matters,

intelligence and counterinteliligence investigations. This

paper was dated 2/13/75 and set forth information taken

from certain documents or parts of documents by the LIC

and, in some instances, the ICIS. All of these documents

have been cleared for passage to the SSC by the following

members of the IIC, as well as Mr. William Wark, Executive

Secretary of the ICIS:

bat
Mr. Rowland Morrow, Director, Defense oS aaa

Investigative Programs Office; Mr. Merrill © se
Kelly, Deputy Director of Operations, ACST, ee
U. S. Army; Colonel Leo Olsen, OSI, U. S. {

Air Force; Mr. Jack Donnelly, Naval Investi~ _ \
gative Service. on
. ~
Mr. Wark advised he did not feel it necessary oe
to clear decuments through the Attorney General since they Sat
pertain to TIC matters which were merely concurred in by ws,
Icis. 1
Copies of the documents involved are attached and AS

are as follows:

G

ee

Enclosures CONTINUED - OVER |
—_— ARN
JRW:tdp (7) tH, LP WG BOE in ee E
L- Me. Mintz / ‘
1 - Mr. Wanna1t Not “Rot RECORDS . ; = / vA a
1 - Mr. Cregar ¥ YL sus 4 ; Ahwoag it a
1 ~ My. Fulton (Lacey) | eee eter — Pes P=
1 ~ Mr. Flemister - ALL 4 ’ ; 0
} -~ Mr. Wagoner fe ORE IAIN Coety,
g HERES op CONTAINE
pare (ol DolF |

BY


. - +
at
. -

Memorandum to Mr. W.R.,. Wannall »
RE: CLEARANCE OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY.

THE INTERDEPARTMENTAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE

(IIC) FOR RELEASE TO THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

(1) Excerpt from report on the status of the
. Internal Security Program of the U. 8S. as
of 6/30/58 dated 8/27/58, prepared by the

TIC and the ICIS,

(2) Department of Justice memorandum dated
. 8/5/64 to Former Director Hoover setting
forth new charter for the IIC under Attorney
General supervision.

(3) Excerpt from report: on the Internal Security
Program dated 3/5/54, prepared by the Tic
and the ICIS.

(4) Letter from Former Director Hoover, Chairman,
, IIc, to the Honorable McGeorge Bundy, Special
Assistant to the President, The White House,
dated 7/25/61 and its enclosure of 7/25/61,
prepared by the IIc.

~

(5) Memorandum from NSC Representative on ~~
Internal Security J. Patrick Coyne to Former
Director Hoover dated 11/6/50 and letter to
Mr. J. Patrick Coyne, NSC, dated 11/8/50
from Former Director Hoover, Chairman, IIC,
and its enclosure.

ACTION: :
None. For information.

sa ‘a

wy

» k
Wh ean

“NWwese296" Bechd:32989588 Page 122 ; : ; se ~


Ie ae?
Assoe. Dir.
Dep. AD Adm. __
Dep. AD Inv.
Asst. Dir,:
Admin,
Comp. Syst, —.
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com.
Gen, Inv.
Ident.

Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory
Plana, & Eval.

Spec. Inv.

Training ..

Lagal Coun,

Telephone Rm.

: i [ec a
. ited HERR afee ROOMC] TELETYPE UNIT wy eae Sess yas GPO 254-586) 9.4

- ur. _ A. Mintz (. B. Hotis
Mr. @BR. Wannall .
Mor. WO. Cregar ~ ° 7

- Mr. R. E. Moocre

' CODE TELETYPE URGENT

bet ht pe
i

TO SAC EL PASO (62-1957) JUNE 3, 1975

FROM DIRECTOR FBI (105~78256)

THOMAS RIHA; MISCELLANEOUS - INFORMATION CONCERNING. WY,
REEPAIRTEL, MAY 8, 1970. .
" IMMEDIATELY CONTACT DR, JOSEPH SMILEY T0 DETERMINE IF CoN- N

~
TENTS OF ATRTEL CAN BE FURNISHED CONF IDENTIALLY TO SENATE SE ELECT

F-4

COMMITTER TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT [0

A

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. IF SMILEY HAS. RESERVATIONS ABOUT

RELEASE OF INTERVIEW TO THIS COMMITTEE ASCERTAIN UNDER WHAT CON-

ne

QRIGINAL FILED IN (OS

DITIONS, iF ANY, HE PORLDAGRER AO, SUCH RELEASE. SUTEL ATTEN~
TION W, O. CREGAR CUMMUNICATIGNS { —. ied

. 1cS, _
REM: jm Wa vt , . JUN 3 ge : LA MOBY 7
(7) ee NOT RECORDED
_ 46 JUN 5 1975

The Senate Select Committee has expressed an alingent
interest in the details of any FBI investigation concerning ~the
disappearance of Thomas Riha, former Professor at University of
Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, in March, 1969. The Bureau con-
ducted no investigation regarding the disappearance. There was
considerable publicity with reference to a statement made by
Dr. Smiley, thén President of the university, that he had been
informed by a Government official that Riha "was alive and well"
Smiley was interviewed by the El Paso Office. Smiley furnished
information in the strictest of confidence, not to be dissemin-
ated to any outside agency, regarding his contacts with a CIA
representative in Bouldér after the Riha disappearance. It was
the CIA official who told him that Riha was alive and well.
Without the Smiley interview our response to the Senate Select
Committee has an obvious gap. If the Committee calls any wit-
nesses in the Riha matter Dr. Smiley would be one of the most
logical persons to call. The passage of time and other factors
may have brought about a change in the mind of Dr. Smiley
regakding the necessity to keep the information funn:
ina confideAtial relationship with the Bureau and itN
believed he should be given the opportunity to either « ire ope

NOTE:

restrict tion he, _laposed. RLA

5

32989588 Page 123

; ) ‘oe p Adana
i : 3 Mintz
f ks, Hotis

Wannail
1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar

The Attorney General May 22, 1975

Director, FBI

O
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE Wid fv
OW INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES VUE 7

2 OTA LT TET TS NET

Enclosed for your information is the original of

a memorandum concerning the interview by Senator Walter fF.
Hondale of the Senate Select Committee as weil as members of

| dts stafE of retired FBI Special Agent John P. Devlin. A

'  gopy of this memorandum is also enclosed for forwarding to
' lr, James A. Wilderotter, Associate Counsel to the President.

: Enclosures (2)

re
62-116395 &
1 = 67-220521 (Personnel File for SA John P. Devlin) ‘, fr
WOC: cme, -wre . v , a
(9) _— ALL MEGA! SCONCES ht MED yo
HEF. BUYS:

IOLASSIFHE
NOTE: DATE H BY
The furnishing of the LHM to the Attorney General
with a copy for forwarding to Wilderotter is the same
procedure we have followed in the past regarding the inter-
views of former ma employees by the SSC Staff.

(| fo ( r _ tte od

bs eee
| ben ore ki lane .

Asst. Dir. ~ Sone Nate
Admin,
Comp. Syst. —_
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com.
Gen, Inv.
Ident.
Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory as gf
Plon. & Eval. — 2

Spec. Inv.
to
Ah
wo

Training
Legal Coun.
Telephone Rm. oe

OOM Y TELETYPE UNIT (_]

irecjor i
Nivea NDecld: TS oses Pge 124

- 7 ( \ we ‘ae JUNG 1875
GA iy we
& ( = 4 co _— }

/ BE, i Nar ws ote 920
6 UB toe 9h (OES

B. Adams

A. Mintz

B. Hotis

~ Mr. W. R. Wannall

- Mr. W. 0. Cregar /

‘\
fod ft food fot fot
it?
ta te te
}
>
on 8

62-116395 May 22, 1975 od.

2

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE oe
_ 86 STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS |
WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES -

RE: INTERVIEW OF RETIRED SPECIAL AGENT (SA)
SENATOR WALTER F. HONDALE AND

Set out below is information yoluntarily furnished
to the FBI by retired SA John P. Devlin following his voluntary
appearance before Senator Mondale and Staff Members of the
Senate Select Committee on May 19, 1975. Deviin's appearance
foliowed an interview of him by Senate Select Committee Staff
Member Michael T. Epstein on April 25, 1975. A memorandum
reporting the results of the April 25, 1975, interview was for-
warded to the Attorney General as an enclosure to my letter to
the Attorney General dated Mey 8, 1975, entitled "United States
Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with
Respect. to Intelligence Activities."

On May 19, 1975, Devlin was interviewed by Senator
Mondale; SSC Chief Counsel Frederick A. 0. Schwarz, Jr.7
Assistant Minority Counsel Charles Kirbow; and Epstein. The
interview was conducted in a building across the street from
the Dirksen Building in Washington, B, C., and lasted from
approximately 2:00 p.m. to 3:20 p.m. Devlin was not subpoenaed
to appear but appeared voluntarily. He was placed under oath
by Senator Mondale.

At the outset of the interview Devlin was advised of

Assoc. Di, sigs WEGhts: that he could be represented by counsel and that
per Di 3£ he had none, but desired counsel, the Committee Staf£ would:
Ast Dis = SsC«CAELOMpPt to provide one for him. At the conclusion of the intet-

Admin. view he was thanked but given no indication as to whether he

Ln would be called to testify before the SSC. '
Files & Com. — \
Gen. Inv.

Went. sk = ~67-220521 (Personnel | File for SA John P. Deviin)

Inspection
Intell. woc: ome Ad:

Plen & Evol (9) Oe SEE NOTE PAGE 4 i »

Spec. Inv.

Se

“

Training

tyn/
Legal Coun. _
Telephone Rm. — ae / fe - ar
Director Sec'y MAIL ROOM({] TELETYPE UNIT[L_] cad PO 1 1978 0 - 569-920

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 125 “eso


ete et @ q

ad
pt)
7

Interview of Retired Special Agent (SA)
by Senator Walter F. Hondale and

Staff Members of the Sanate Select
Committee (SSC)

Pollowing being advised of his rights, Devlin
was asked who sent him to Atlantic City and why he was sent.
Ha advised he received his instructions from Special Agent in
Charge Ralph Bachman through Devlin's supervisor, SA Vincent
Wurphy. It is to be noted here that upon kheing interviewed by
Epstein on April 25, 1975, Devlin had indicated ha had received
his instructions through his supervisor, SA William Gagnon.
Devlin corrected this mistake during the interview of Nay 1°,
1975. As to why he was sent, Devlin advised that as a sound
man o£ the Hovark Office he vas sent to Atlantic City,
New Jersey, to install a technical surveillance on Martin Jarther
TA ewe WhO occupied a room at the Claridge Wotel In “that= “~~
‘ oity. Devlin was asked whether the monitoring plant for the
electronic surveillance was located in the same hotel. Upon
being advised it was the intervievwers' desire to know whether
the lecation of the plant ab the Claridge Hotel was also designed
to serve ag a physical leokout on King's room, Devlin advised
he was not aware that the FBI employed a-physical lookout on
Ring's hokel room. Devlin was also asked whether he installed
a microphone in the room of King. He advised that hea had not
because it was not technically feasible. Also of concern to
those interviewing Devlin on May 19, vas whether he had personal
knowledge as to whether the Attorney Ganeral had approved the
electronic surveillance on King's telephone. Devlin roplied he
had no personal knowledge but assumed such authority had been
obtained by his supervisor. PDovlin was also asked if he could
recall any conversations over King's phone which were monitored.
Devlin replied that the only recollection he had involved con-~
varsations betwoon King and his wife wheroin they discusced
her plans to travel to Atlantic City. Additionally, ne did
recall conversations involving the noted entertainor, Mehalia
Jackson, who was appearing at that time in Atlantic City.
Devlin could not recall the substance of the conversation with
Jackson. He was also asked vhathor he retained or possessed any

' NW 85296 Docid:32989508 Page 1276


Re: Interview of Retired Special Agent (SA)
by Senator Walter F. Mondale and
Staff Members of the Senate Select
Committee (SSC)

notes regarding the activity that occurred in Atlantic City during
the Democratic Party Nominating Convention during the summer of
1964. Devlin advised that he did not retain any notes but sub-
sequent to the original contact of ‘him by Epstein, Devlin called
SA John Connelly of the FBI Office in Newark in an effort to
review any available material that might refresh his recollection.
Connelly advised Devlin that all materials and notes retained by
the Newark Office were forwarded to FBI Headquarters. This infor-
mation was conveyed to the interviewers on the occasion of the
May 19, 1975, interview.

Devlin also was asked if he ever questioned the tech-
nical coverage of King inasmuch as it appeared to be for
political rather than security reasons. Devlin replied that he
had no reason to question the technical coverage of King. He
also was asked if he personally met with Mr. Cartha DeLoach of
the FBI while both vere in Atlantic City. Devlin advised he
could not recall whether he actually met DeLoach, pointing out
that SA Billie D. Williams was assigned the liaison responsihility
with DeLoach.

Deviin was asked whether he had contacted the FBI
following his original interview by Epstein on April 25,
1975. Devlin advised he had reported the interview by
Epstein to the FBI Office in Newark, New Jersey. He further
advised that subsequent to this, he received a call from Newark
Assistant Special Agent in Charge Herbert Clough who informed
him that should he be contacted in the future, and should he
feel he needed to consult with FBI officials, he could call the
Legal Counsel Division, FBI Headquarters, in Washington, D,. C.,
collect, for such consultation. Senator Mondale desired to know
who Devlin saw upon his arrival in Washington, D. C., on the
morning of May 19, 1975, and specifically what instructions he
received from the FBI. Devlin advised Senator Mondale that

NW 88296 Docid:32989508 Page 127


4

toromt (GA}

Mes Enteorvieud of Pokircd Spockal Act
by Senator Valter if. Mondale and
Geass iembors of the Senabe
Corzitken (88C)

upon arrival in Vaohington, —. C., ke renorted to Inscootor

John totic of the Leqal Commseol tivision and Paul Vv. Pally oF the
CBI at which tims he was advised of what oblications he had te
theo Retorney Conexal ag a formor emmloyan of the PRE ta protuct
information obtainad by virkuc of his former ormloyeeat in the
iT. Subooqaont to fovlin's mocking with tir. Fetis and rr. Paly,
he oponk the somainder of tha morning with CA Willian Oo. Ceogar.
Vendale dosized to bnew cracifieally unat fovlin and Crogar dis-
cussed. Lovlin adviced that othor than discussing mutual
rxiendshins in tho FEE, Crogar adviecd of what Creanr's sale
vould be in accenmanying nim to the intervie and specifically
thot Teylin could geok froa to agi: for tho opportunity to con-
sale wlth Cregas during the intervier: Z£ the Line ef incuiry
eould pensibly roveal the identity of sourens, sensitive rothods
or investigative tnehmigues, infermation darived fron third .
agencies, or Infomation vhich could adversely affeet cencitive
ongoing inwastigations.

VOTE:

Original and one copy to the Attorney General (AG)
for forwarding the copy of the memorandum to James A.
Wilderotter, Associate Counsel to the President. ‘The infor-
mation contained herein was orally furnished to SA W. oO. Cregar
by former SA Devlin following his interview of May 19, 1975.

NW 88296. Docld:32989568 Page 125


q

atte. —de Ae Miner
1--"Nrv WRT Wannall
June 4, 1975 1 - Mr. W. O,
Cregar

Ll-M. S.F
ORAL INFORMATION PROVIDED To am SEaaTE Phillips

. SELECT COMMITTEE INVESTIGATING
\) | INTELLIGESGE ACTIVETTES (SSC)
By

1. SUBJECT: Martin Luther King, Jr.

2. WITNESS' ORGANIZATION: Retired Special Agent of
FBI

3. FILE REFERENCE NO.: Bureau file 62-116395
4, DATE OF INTERVIEW: 5/19/75

5. INTERVIEWERS: Senator Walter F. Mondale of the SSC;
SSC Chief Counsel Frederick A. 0, Schwarz, Jr.; SSC Assistant
Minority Counsel Charles Kirbow; and SSG Staff Member Michael T.
Epstein,

6. CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION: Unclassified ( i @¢
_

7. SUMIARY OF CONTENT: Witness was interviewed under oath; ”

although he did not appear under subpoena, as a follow-up to at

earlier interview of him by an SSC Staff Member. His testimony

concerned his participation in the former FBI investigation of

Martin Luther King, Jr.

8, RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS: None.
62-116395 aad

; uff
SFP:ekar ¢ \W.! Bate ot
(6) Pe jeer

Assoc. dir. NOTE: Original via liaison to Central Commmity Index in

me ap connection with Senstudy 75.
Asst. Dir:

Admin,

fi

Cogan |= PLLINFORMATIOY CONTA

oe Ext, Affairs —___ HSREN HS UNC! ESIFIE NEG \ ”
Files & Com. DATE na ay GY ,

mea Lyfe pA ye ag
ao * ba.- [est en - é

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. —
Spec. Inv.
Training

Legal Coun, 2 17 JUN 6 1975

Telephone Rm. __.

DigpreeocH SN 6 mAQZBoomC reneryer ur
WL 66296 Dochd:32989580 Page 129

——ee 1 GPO 934-346

_ ee

a ry @
, JHE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
t

WASHINGTON, BD. C. 20505

) 8 sun 1975

Intelligence Community Staff

woe ee

On oN
( Sengt£s 4 5° _

Mr. William 0. Cregh
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Room 4123

J. Edgar Hoover Building

Dear Bill:

Attached is a letter to the Chairman of the

Congressional Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, bs
signed by the DCI on 29 May 1975. It deals with

the custody for and access to certain particularly 4
sensitive material. This is an effective arrangement 4

for the protection of special matters. 1 >!

Sincerely, € My

Enclosure:

As Stated
EC 102 A?
2 639-147)
— ad
gy JUN 6 1975

B43uN 6 1975

296 Docid:32969588 Page 130


; . ; , ‘ . V rxecutive Registy
ae CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AEN Pletal)
" |

” WasHinecton, D.C. 20505

OLC 75-1163

29 MAY 75

Honorable John O. Pastore, Chairman -

| Joint Committee on Atomic Energy .
United States Congress : - .
Washington, D.C. 20510 .

Dear Mr. Chairman:

In my letter to you on 20 May 1975 I requested your
-assistance in making the Joint Committee's secure storage
facilities available for the retention of certain sensitive
material to which access is needed by the Senate Select
Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect
to Intelligence Activities. Those arrangements have been
made with Mr. George Murphy and with the Select Committee.
I want to thank you for making the facilities available and for
permitting Mr. Murphy to be the custodian of the material.

A further need has now arisen for the same kind of
arrangement for the House Select Committee on Intelligence.
Again I would be very grateful to you and Mr. Murphy ifa
Similar arrangement could be made. for the members of the
House Committee and members of the Committee staff
designated for access to such material by mutual agreement
of Chairman Nedzi and myself,

~ Sincerely,

ish W. E. Colby

W. E. Colby
Director

Distribution: —

Original - Addressee

-DCI

~ Mr. Knoche

- ER

- Mr. Clarke 1 , ;

- Select Committee . d :

~ OLC Chreno ly mh ~/16 PF |
1 - JCA File ENCLOSURE

1 NW-86296 Docid:32989588 Page 131

Bete ee


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 ¢ 5010-106 6

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA GEN, REG, NO. 27 4 a

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT re Din aol

een iad
Memorandum sen 2

Admin,
Comp. Syst. __
Ext. Affairs

Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: May 23, 1975 Files & Col -

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

5 Counsel ie —_ clit oes
,aborator:

ame ae

SUBJECT: . Coesior 29 — Spee chi :

>» Training
Mr. John E11liff, Domestic Intelligence Task
Force Director of captioned Committee advised that they
were in receipt of a letter from the U. S. Postal Service
inforning the Committee an inquiry concerning the identity
of all mail covers placed by the FBI since 1960, should
be directed to the FBI.

Telephone Rm. _
Director Sec’y

ELLif£ inquired as to whether a letter from
the Committee concerning this particular request should
be directed to the Bureau or Attorney General. He was
instructed the request should be directed to the Attorney
General. B1liff said that he would direct such a letter
to the Attorney General making a request concerning mail
covers in the near future.

The Intelligence, Special Investigative and
General Investigative Divisions should gather necessary
material so that the appropriate response might be

prepared.
- po 16 pipe
-Mr. Wannall ;
1-Mr. Cregar i ‘
1-Mr. Cleveland Gl
1-Mr. Gebhardt ¢ uh
1-Mr. Mintz et 402 b
i-Mr. Hotis At ; a -
1-Mr. Daly va hd df] (53 4, 44 ’
MISE EKER 7
PvDilgp 1) ALLE ao At ON CONTAINER” —
(9) Pgh HERES OZ sre a a7 JUN 6 1975
HERE AL
re] eres
f°
4, INNS 1975

NW 88296 Docld:32583588 Page 132


ie
q

Legal Counsel Division

, (i-Mr, J.C, Farrington)
Mr. W, R. Wannall

~ Mr. W. O, Cregar

‘ The Attorney General April 2b, 1975

bt he
1

ft
!

Mr. BP, T, Biake
Director, FBI ~

r

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT commrrtan “ULI A U0 CONTAINED

HERE wt
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES Dats (abo) x SPOALM2>

_ se”

Reference is made to a etter from the Senate Select
Committee dated March 19, 1975, requesting certain documents
tas sther information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation
FBI}.

Two of the documents requested were the Special
Report of the Interagency Committee on Intelligence (Ad Hoc) Se”
dated June, 1970, and the original report on COINTELPRO ~ ‘
activities prepared by the Gommittée headed by Assistant B
Attorney General Henry Petersen, With respect to the original 4
report on COINTELPRO activities, pursuant to the conversation
between Mr, John ¢, Keency, Department of Justice, and Special
Agent James C, Farrington, FBI Headquarters, on March 27,
1875, it was agreed the Department would await receipt of the
Bureau's opinion prior to formulating its response to Senator
Church's request for the 39-page Petersen report on COINTELPRO,

The 39-page COINTELPEO report, as well as all but
) one of Exhibits A through P attached thereto, contains matters
| relating to the internal deliberations of Department and FBI
Ai representatives who constituted the study Conmittee headed hy
\ id former Assistant Attorney General Fetersen, It is, therefore,
en suggested that if it is decided the report should be “hade~
available to Senator wes hoa be done with the provi gion

it not be made public. REC-59 G2 ft te a7 wie

Concerning the exhibits referred to in
; the report: Exhibits A through L are stummarics ins Racoon

“pen AD Ades prepared by the FBI or by Department attorneys based on their —
Dep. AD fav. — review of FBI material, and some of these are classified a
Meet ies "Secret"; Exhibits M and N are legal memoranda prepared by

Comp. Sysu Departnent attorneys in connection with the study Committee  . .
Ext, Affairs inquiry; Exhibit P is a work paper -preparéd, by the FRI Setting ue
Gen tows

Ident.
Inspection
Intell.

Laboratory ___ . os .? dy ' { ~. ~

Plen. & Evel, — EWL:glw/jvi ¢ { » HK Ng xe CN p

Treining , (8) “y . : Oo WA bs *“ \ % wer —
Legal Coun. . _

le phon: oft Y fa Dey Gor 8 Cif,
S.2. AON 4 ARUP room C4 TELetype unit CJ Deltsrad Fa Sok : a Ne Pr 954.546
NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 133 Sedo pen Y/22/06 fish

~ yd
ages A poet TS iege? pris


The Attornoy Gondral

forth overall reconmmondations relating to counterintelligonee
activity. All of these exhibits arc in the nature of
deliberative, internal werk papors whexvein opinions vero
freoaly exprossad bocause they vere not prepared with the

idea in mind of publication, and 4% would appear thoy would
be oxempt from disclosure oven if the report itself is
furnished to Senator Church,

it is, thovoforo, rocommondcd that, duc to tho
above gonsidorations, these ofhibits prépared by tho FBE not
bo furnished ta Senntor Church if.you do detide te give hin .
the roport,” Et is felt the Dopartmont should detormine if
those exhibits prepared solely by the Dopartmont, such ag -
Dahibite Mand N, should be furnished to the Senator, but it °
is aur rocommendation tint they not be Zor the same reasons
a5 stated above,

Exhibit O is a press release dated December 7, 1973,
which, of course, is already public source in nature,

You will recall that then Peputy Attorney Goneral
Laurente Silborman, in fewstinony before the Civil Rights and
Constitutional Rights Subcommittee of the House Committee on
the Judiciary as to why this 30epage repeyt should not be
furnished fo that Committee stated, ",,.,1f wo had thought 44
WAS approprinte to veleasa the full discussion we would have
dono so at the time, ‘Thero are ao lot of internal working
docgunonts in the Justice Department whieh go to the making of
a £inal voport, This is the Attornoy General's roport,*

Attanhed fox your Approval and forwarding to tha
Committco ia tho original of a memorandum which sot forth
the status of thaly request for the tvo documents, A topy
of this momorandun is anclosed fer your vocords,

Enclosures -— 2

NW 88296 Docld:32989508 Page 134


a | e

Legal Counsel Division
(l-lv, J,C, Farrington)
Mr. We Re Wannall

Mr, W. O, Cregar

~ ir, P, Te Blake

Apri 24, 1075

5

eee Of
1

UNITOD STATIS SHYATS SELECT comiirTreE
fO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH
RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIUS

Refcrence is made to letter dated March 19, 1975,
to the Attornoy Gonexval from. the Choixman of captioned
Comittec, whieh enclosed certain requests for documents
and other information from the Foderai Bureay of Investipa-
tion,

Gre of the reaguests, under V., 4., wns the Speeial
Report of the Interngency Comnittes on intelligence tid Hoc}
dated dune, 1976, This is the so=calied “Huston Report” and
was prepared Zor tho Vhite House, Under tho circunstances,
this reauest has been referred to the Vhito House,

Under Va, Ge, a reqtiert was pide for the origgnal
report on communene aetivities prepared by the Committee
headed by Ausistant Attorney Gonoral Heury Petorsen, Since
that regert i the property of the Bopartuent of Jnstice,
the request hus heen regerred to that Departucnt,.

1 = The Attorney General

AULCPORMATION CONTAIN)
: PCIUESTAD Pe aap pore een
EWVLigiw/jvi Sane (al Ae )
wy (8) yr : ie {OL-O7 6 Saye
if alee
( why

Legal Coun,

Assoc. Dir, \ y cd
Dep. AD Adm. _. ey wk ot
Dep. AD Inv. — uf Die ae? we X > Ay yore
Asst. Dir: “ oY be et ws eo
Admin. ON Se : en ge gk nd ta
Comp. Syst. ar ee Pra ‘ ut A ~ .
Ext. Affairs K: or yy® iy a) .
. ~— yy ae Le . ‘
Files & Com. 5 0 , ‘
Gen. | we “h ot | rd
en. Inv. hid Cs wwe ve * oa
Ident. | we an . y Le LY! 1. 4 ron ; " .
Inspection Sen my Tl iethy ) ¢|! ae,
Intell. \ ‘aa aero wot ' at C: 5 fe
Laboratory Z od . a) 1? ‘ ;
Plan. & Eval. My ype art _ ot O ’
Specs Inve ‘ an ee De tuared po Jock Fee Bb bs Gots A, 7 ~ y
Training yiye : . _ C
aan $3 B0p Y/2 2/78 flBeY WG

Telephone Rm. __

Director Sec'y-. MAIL ROOM] TELETYPE UNIT] (ied Mek » . / IG / ? Brees
NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 135 bo- ((s2 4372 ve 4


Telephone Rm.

‘t

%

fl Sp
1 - Mr. J. B. Adams A.
1 ” Me. J e A. Mintz Bs
{ Tha Attorney General lay 23, 1975
4
Le - Mi :
IY pieector, FBI 1 - Mm. WR. Wannall
‘aft 1 - Mr, J. B. Hotis L _ Mr P Vv Dal
1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar Fev eeely
U. &, SEUATE SELnCr COLeIETETES TA
STINY GOVERELIMITAL OPTRATINS uo
RESPECT TO INGELLIGEUCE ACLivisILcs
Enelesea for your information is the original
of a memoraniun concerning an intervieu by Staff enbers
of captioned Committee of ir. John P. Mehr, former Assistant
to the Diractor of the FBI, A copy of this memorandum is )
also enclosed for forvarding te Ue. James A. Wilderotter, oA
Associate Gounsel to the President, _
Enelosures - 2
62-116395 ER pa ONL CONTANES -
SSIFIE .
DATE EO) BY
1 - 67- (Personnel File of John P. Mohr)
WOC vekuy CK VAT
10 “REO m 6M | i
{ v7, Jun 5 187
My oo ws ae
“pi ; Vor a
oe poo ee f 1
“ “feo
. tl Lf
Agsoc. Die. LC a On ‘ 5 { fo k o”
Dep, A Ae VA aan t . 4 4[?
Dep. AD lov. iF { "faa 4X ;?
Asst. Dire: _ oe 14D \
Comp. syah a , a ‘ Ure
nicl “a ; ; - . , ) )
FilesBJYUAYS i“ . . te tt
Ident. a age an ota a to ?
ore ae ernie " :
arene Qe Op?
Spec. Inv. ee ‘ yt
Training —#
Legal Coun, . fi [
IPO 954-34

jroctor a Hits va75n00M

| ON Sai06 Docid:32589588 Page 136

ii TELETYPE UNIT [__] J ¢ CT me
Ya e See :


ee . @
- *y

- Me. J. B, Adams
Mr.J. A. Mintz

- Me. W. R. Wannall
- Mr. J. B. Hotis

62116395 tay 23, 1975
1 - Me. P. V. Daly
1 - Mr, W. O. Cregar

U0, 8. SECATE SELECT COLIMITTER TG
STUY GOVERMIEITAL OPERATIONS WITH
RESPECT TO TTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIZS (SSC)

fol fet food fat
5

RS: TITIRVICT OF PORE ASSISTANT To THE
DIRECTOR JOLT P. TO SSR patients

“STE Nees
ITEIBERS HER Tap iy

Sot out hole; is inferration voluntarily gumisked
to the PBI by be. Lbhr folloving hig intervie by represontatives
of the Staff of the SSC in Tashin«ton, D..C., on May 9, 1975,

iis, Kohr cas interyieved by Staff Members Lark
Gitar ensteln, Lester B, Seidel, and Thomas Payson from
approsinately 10:20 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. He was not placed
un or cath and he was not advised of his richts or that he
eoule be represented by personal counsel.

ft the quisat of the imterviey, Li vas apparent
that its purpose vag to assist the SSC Stake Uerhors in _
\: teyiny to Th cestang Rar the elo be Sruil procecdes in the
For exemple, he. Mohr
aa shown FBI ceeumonts relotin: to “tha Socialist Yorkers Party
ag voll as CODMELERO cocurents hich vere obtained by
tie . Gard Stern uncer the Freedom of Information Act. wo
substantive questions vere directed to Hr. Hohr rocarding
thase decuments but vere shom to him in orcer that ke, Lohr
Assoc, Dir, Zo mghe inentify “tho the final authority ras in approving, & such

Dep, AD Adm,

Dep. AD lav. _ HOCRMONES ,.

PBI uncer ie. t Teaver "s_ GivectorGht wm RL

Asst. Dir.:
Admin,
Comp. Syst, — In addition te the above, the Stars 2 Lepbers asked
pt Mois ie, iohe to explain the difference bet: 70en an Sac" ‘Yettor and
Gen, Inv letter to all S$ics, They also asked Me. Moke. dg the Eurcau Yad
Ieee Exvintaines a separate File on all SAC Letters, ) x ae
Lubersrey ok = 67- (Personnel Filetof John P. Mohr) 4
Plan. & Eval, _ a
pec. Inv, \"
Teining MOC: elr@¥ J 1)
ee —-(10) SEE NOTE PAGE THREE
Director Sac'y... «§ « MAIL ROOM[__] TELETYPE uNIT (_] ENCLOSURE . em j Hf PO 924-346
NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 137 7 ris -// fo De = 4


ye
i
oo ~~
e s

wpe wep pera a ce pe eee g qin sees mgr peg cae 5

DU. i. DICT SOLECS COMLIEREDA hi BIECLLIGS CES AORIVECTCH

+) eee op: - : La ye te 7 a ao om . co sgre S Shoe we

403 PARRY IS) OF YOM AOA2%orO YT £0 THA DE Cant deal Pp.
VM TY See S94

SLE becetre
“Hp [TIRES

ae,

2a, Ushe vas olce queshioned about tha gseacccunres
ko €elloved Im soemtins te, J. Eeuar Heover'’a offdeo after
°%e,. Haovear’s ¢sath, Ua. Ushy told the Staff Uerbers that
the ovtiole .vhich appoore: im “Lho Uasbincten Stas" by
eolermsist Jereoiah O'imary vas an aeonrate tecngdia: of
what tes place following Ge. Maover’g death, Tha oraft
Nerboeg roquested Tr. Vohe covderr in considerable detail
eooethy that he did ta saeuee Ue. Hoover's offiea fabloring
his acath.

the question of former fssselate Liscetar Clyda
teivents will vas also raised by Steff Lorhora. Ue. Tishe
aovigad tha intervievors that Willecy Taleen, beothor af
Glyds Enloon, had nok cecidei at that time whother he vas
poine ta egntecst the wilt.

i. Uohe vas aleo ashed abawt the vhereabauts of
Miss Yolen foray, gormer Teamitive fesiotant toe ie. Heavar.
He auviued that bo did bnew hor uborenhouks ang teLlerhens
number but promiced he veuld mt moveal thom te anyon.
le. Usher vas asked chether Jas Ceney cowl! agen ta bein>
intezviewuod by Staff Mombors of the S56, He acvised thet
he vould attempt to porsuaca Mise Caniy to aceca to bainy
intorvicra. om tha cendition he be alloca to bo pracen’
“uring the oveire intervies. Tho Gtaff Ussbexs Interpaccd
na objection to that arwancemont ond Ue. Lohr Initieated that
fin wewkd acviee Me, Gitenstein of Iss Gandy'’s Costece unvler
the aaniitdons stipulated above.

ta May 12, 1973, Me. ifsbe telephenieally aoyiuad
that ha reeslied sera elJitional topias eovarad caring the
tatoesios of May 9, 1975, whieh ho Jesdred ta Suenish te tke
VSI. Upeeifienlly, iz. Mehr ccealle! thet ho vas asked if he
ieert vhe preperad tha “surroptiticus letters the Dares hou
rafled in tha Seeialiot Verkers Farty case. iy. Mehr advice?
tha Steff Uerbors that he cid net kaa but geresumed thes
Latters vera pranure! dm tha Vecument Section of tha YoT
Lokoratery.

NW 86296 Docid:32989568 Page 138


men oe Re el ae et els Pe ee aS re, age ~, a rol ata are eee
U. 5. SOUATE SCLncr CRITE G3 ELELISiCh AGPIVILTCS

Ror TWERVEG? OF PORMGA AGSISEAGT TO Ti: DER OPI JOG v.

IHR BY SSS SEAT? IETMEIS

at

BS Meade te,

ts, Mebr also rcenlied thet cecice hin tntcevicr of

May 9, 1075, ko had adviced ities ancy bed turned over te
We. Mork Pkt of tho PEE the off4elal and cankscential flies
of Ee. Beover vhich amsunted to one-half a Eile draver.
Cubsequonbiy, ie. Mole lesrned from Miss Cancty that the official
ans corficentiel files turned over to Le. Pelt amounted ta
onc ang one-half ff1c deerers, ‘This information ras sxbeaguonthy
fumishad to Ur. Glienctein by Ia. Mohr. fm that occasion,
ig, Gitengtoin askew te, isthe vhethes an Phemicni List of the
erfieial and confidential files vas rave ond Ef! se views the
List vas, Uske teld Gitensteain thot ha was sara a List -as
tate and thet in cll probability the list aoccetranied the

fvieisl and eenticential Files turned over te Me. Pols by
Wises Gancw.

fm addition ta the above, Me. Mohr on Moy 12, 1975,
eomalled that Gitenstein acked ekeuwt a requiroment of cll Parcag
cmployees tha tum over any confidential Files in thete ressagsion
endomed by Ue. Hsaver followin. the revelation that fermir
Assistant to the Pirceter Tiiliom 6. Sullivan hed ternal over
eertain tanficontial ffies te fermor Assistant Atternay Ceneral
Taedian, ie. lol auviead Giterstain thot Me. Meover hau in
fact tovicd suth a caqgii¢crent on fureau offfeliais ani that ull
eonfiidontinl giles vara to bo tummed aver to Ee, Vekt alens with
a moteraicem osplainin: tha mature of these files, ltenviein
ached Moke shore Chace memoranda vewld be filed. Usle cespontded
by sayins he petcsumad they vore contidential totorance and vould
have cenag with the conticential files temned over ta Me. Pelt by
Tuvean efficinis maintainin~ ouh lies.

NOTE: The original and one copy of this IMM is being furnished
to the Attorney General. ‘The copy is te be forrarded by the
Attorney General to Mir. James A, Wilderotter, Associate Counsel
to the President. The information herein vas taken from tve
mamoranda, Cregar to tannall, dated 5/9 and 12/75 entitled
"Senstudy 75."

NW 88796 Docld:32989588 Page 139


who Min EZ,

1 — Mee
1M tire R-Wanna Lies

June 2, 1975 1 - Mr. W. 0. Cresar
- 1 - Mr. S, F. Phillips

lt ORAL INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE SENATE
. SELECT CO STIGATING
ELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (ssc)
ere ON

1. SUBJECT: FBI mail flow procedures and other
miscellanéous matters,

2. WITMESS' ORGANIZATION: Retired Special Agent, FBI

3. FILE REFEREVCE WO.: 62-116395

4. DATE OF INTERVIEW: 5/9/75

5. INTERVIEWERS: SSC Staff Members Mark Gitenstein,
Lester B, Seidel, and Thomas Dawson. ty

6. GLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION: Unclassified —

7. SUMMARY OF CONTENT: The witness vas questioned and
furnished information concerning procedures relating to the

flow of mail at FBI Headquarters and other miscellaneous matters
such as the difference between an SAC Letter and a letter to all

SAGs.
8, RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUITITY | Hone«
rs ae EN
62-116395 oy ee y poo) % ee
SFP: ekwimy HERE: 7 /G-O/ ws RIbEE et jar
; \ i a
NOTE: Original via liaison to Central Community Index in
connection with Senstudy 75.
Aas ie y , REC-100 --/9 3
Dep. AD Adm. _
cargo oe bop - EE
Admin,
Comp. Syst. —__ ye Alii an 15715
Ext. Affairs —_
Files & Com. ~~ Ft re
Gen. Inv. —_——e
faent _— / a
Inspection 4

Intell.
Laboratory
Plan. & Eval, _
Spec. Inv.
Training

Lega! Coun,

Telephone Rm.
Director Socty MAIL ROOM[__] - TELETYPE uNnIT (_]} GPO 974345

é 6 Bocidiidesoses Page 140


OPTIONAL FORM HO, 10 . q 5010-106 r

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27 J

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Assoc. Dir,

Ona Ok Fal
Memorandum ects mae

ol : Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 5-29-75 Files & Com, —

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

FROM =: Legal come fi rari : ue
— ale
(0- Ogee
SUBJECT SENSTUDY 75 . Spee. Inv.
raining
a Telephone Rm. —_

Director Sec*y __

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, K. William
O'Connor requested on 5-28-75, that he be given the opportunity
to review summaries of the five recently uncovered COINTELPRO
programs. O'Connor stated that in view of captioned Committee's
request concerning COINTELPRO and his position of being in charge
of Bureau and Departmental responses to Committee requests, he }
felt that it would be advantageous for him to be generally aware,
of the contents of the five newly uncovered programs. PY
Mr. O'Connor stated he had previously reviewed the other &
COINTELPRO programs. [wot te in Ctl Rigats Divistog] , oe

RECOMMENDATION :

That Mr. OfConnor be allowed to review the five
recently uncovered COINTELPRO programs.

{ ALLINFORMATION CONTAINED _

HEREIN IS | SIFIE
2 ‘ DATE head Y ROBUE lew
- Mr. Wannall f

- Mr. Cregar ING
- Mr. Ryan

Mr. Mintz

- Mr. Hotis ve

- Mr. Daly f

PyDreck + (oa-LMG.2:

ee
1

NW 68796 Docld:37989588 Page 141


“ 4 co

‘DPSIONAL FPRMSNO. 10 @ Nyo10-106 ; ®

WAY 1962 16 1ON

GSA GEN, REG. NO, 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Assoc. Dir.

Dep, AD Adm. _
‘ Dep. AD Inv. —
) \ {f a mM 1- Mr. J. B. Adams Asst, Dir.:
iA emoranau 1 - Mr. T. J. Jenkins Admin,
Me Whe Le come: Syst —
TO : Mr. W. R. wanna { DATE: 5/22/75 Files & Com
Gen. Inv.
. i- Mr. J. A. Mintz tent.
FROM : W. of ecar 1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall ead cal
= Laborotor:
eS 1 Mr. W. O. Cregar Pn 8 Bh
SUBJECT{ SENSTUDY - 75 re BP
_aesPes—>” Telephone Rms
( Director See’y __
wolfe?
Reference is made to my memorandum dated 5/19/75 v/a
advising of the receipt of a letter from the Senate Select

Committee (SSC) to the Attorney General dated 5/14/75, appending
requests for additional documents and other information.

Specific attention is invited to Appendix A, item
number 5, which requests:

discussing the legal authority of the FBI to use the followin
techniques to (1) investigate internal security matters, (2)
collect intelligence information, and (3) engage in counter-
intelligence activities (see letter from the Chief Counsel to
the Deputy Attorney General dated April 23, 1975):

"All Memoranda of the FBI and the Justice "eeliawtny/,
GA

a. All forms of electronic surveillance, including
consensual electronic surveillance;

b. All forms of mail surveillance, including mail
covers and opening mai/liz INFORMATION CONTAINED

HERENY IS pp. r>
c. Surreptitious entry; DATE 4 BY 4 La j
d. All forms of physical surveillance, including
agent infiltration, observation, photography,

and remote viewing and sensing devices;

e. Informants, including possible entrapment, provo-
cation, interference with lawyer-client relation-
ship, or other problems;

£. Obtaining bank, credit, or other personal informa-

tion; arti {p22 F/b3 63% x AG

gs iIncommunicado interrogation;

62-116395 "7 JUN 5 1975

EWL: cme @x>s\C
(6) CONTINUED - OVER

RwdesldNN Bocide8ease8 Page 142

“aE


oe @ @
buf os

Memorandum to
Re: SENSTUDY
62-116395

Mr. W. R. Wannall
- 75

Maintenance of files and records;

Dissemination of information from files and
records;

So-called "COINTELPRO" techniques and methods,
including all forms of organizational 'disruption.'"

Appendix B, item number 4, requests:

"For each of the techniques described in Item 5 of
Appendix A above, all memoranda and other materials relating

to:

The original decision to utilize the technique in
internal security, intelligence collection, and/or
counterintelligence matters, operations, or
activities. —

The policies and procedures of the FBI for the
utilization of the technique in internal security,
intelligence collection, and/or counterintelligence
matters, operations, or activities." ‘

Tt would appear appropriate that response to Appendix
A, item number 5, be prepared by the Legal Counsel Division...
Tt is also apparent that response to Appendix B, item number 4, °~
should be closely coordinated although responsibility for research

in this area would appear to fall more logically within the
Intelligence Division.

‘RECOMMENDATIONS :

‘1.

That Legal Counsel Division assume responsibility

for preparing response contained in Appendix A, Item number 5.

NW 68296 Docid:32989568 Page 143

-2- CONTINUED - OVER

RECOMMENDATIONS - CONTINUED


Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall
Re: SENSTUDY - 75
62-116395

RECOMMENDATIONS. — CONTINUED:

2. Intelligence Division will assume responsibility
for preparing response to item number 4, Appendix B, with input
from the Legal Counsel Division.

pul. ap

aun OW

NW 58296 Docid:32989588 Page 144

2- Mr. S. F. Phillips.

June 3, 1975

MATERTAL FOR SENATE.SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC)
INVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACLIVITIES

mens
Nena ests Uns Caeh Ee aE wal EES STE A OS

1. TITLE/SUBJECT: Legal Authorities of the FBI
2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION: FBI

3. HATURE OF MATERIAL: Letterhead memorandum (LHM)
and its enclosures described below.

4, DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Soné of the énclosures to
the LHM classified "Top Seeret."

C
5. NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP: Should have (4.

6, SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: The LHM refers to a prior LHM
furnished to the SSC enclosing a copy of "Intelligence Division
Position Paper on Jurisdiction" dated 2/13/75 and noted that
certain exhibits were extracted prior to dissemination due to
Third Agency Rule considerations. LHM advised that those
considerations had been resolved and that the exhibits were
being furnished with the LEM.

7. REQUESTOR/DATE OF REQUEST: SSC. 3/19/75. Response
pertains to Part I of the SSC original letter of request dated

3/19/75. ALL INFOR
HEREIN Sa CONTAINED «
8. RELEASING AUTHORITY: FBr = PATE = Ae By Ry, Vn”

a
9. DATE OF SUBMISSION: 5/20/75 ~~~ By a Mo 2px" - 190
10. LOCATION OF FILE COPY: FBI file 62-116395

Assoc. Dir, __—

Dep. AD Adm. — 11. RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBIEMS: Third
Dep. AD Inv. . .

ast de: Agency Rule clearances obtained.

Admia, ____— o

Comp. Syst. - - i

|

Ext. Affairs 62=116395 ~ oe ah a7 JUN 5 19%
Files & Com. — u/ ‘ [2 ll Ly

Ger. nv. SEP selar“t 5 / 7 a
inrsio OTE: stien Non OTE: Original via liaison to Central Community Index in

Loborstory ey connection with Senstudy 75. a“ 4)

Plon. & Eval. . :

Teton. rif jo

‘go! Coun, __ .

ane see's _ MAIL ROOM(] TELETYPE uNIT(] GPO : 1975 © - 569-920

Bezb6) Doclg:32089588 Page 145


Assoc. Dir.
Dep, AD Adm. _.
Dep. AD Inv. __

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.
Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs
Files & Com.

Gen. Inv.
Ident.
Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory
Plan. & Eval. _.
Spec. Inv.

Training rem

Legal Coun.

Telephone,

Bios 2 5 Docld:32989588 Page 146

oe a ON

(i : J. W. Hines)

- LeWel Counsel Division
(Ll - Mr. J. B. Hotis)
Mr. W. R. Wannall

tir. W. O. Cregar

- Mr. K. A. Mendenhall

ele Ne
!

The Attorney General May 29, 1975

EuL INFORMATION CONTAINED _
Director, FBI DANE PS/OS C0 ay CPIOLM Joga

UHITED STATES SENATE -SELECT.COMITTIES

rol ‘
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES By) wo a yee
yl _
he

e

Reference is made to a letter from the Senate Select
Committee dated May 14, 1975, ‘with attached appendices A thre D
requesting certain documents and other information,

Under item 26 of Appendix C, a request is made for
"All reports prepared by the Office of Criminal Justice of
the Department of Justice pursuant to the request in September /
1974 of the Attorney General and/or Deputy Attorney General ot
pe. rtaining | to the so-called ‘Wounded Knee’ case and any other o .=—-—-
so-called ‘political trial’ or other prosecutions brought by
the Special Litigation Section of the Internal Sceurity Division."

Under item 27 of Appendix C request is made of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation for "All memoranda or other
materials prepared by the FBI relating to the yeports described
in Item 26.'

The Departmont is requested to advise this Bureau if

reports which are requested in Appendix Cc under item 26 with

espoet to the "'Wounded Knea' case” were furnished to the PBI.
Tf such reports were Furnished please advise under what captions
and dates these reports were submitted and identify by captions
and dates all FBI communications on which your reports vere
based. If these reports were not furnished this Burea please
provide copies to us when you identify the PEI a re gQ

as requested herein. REC; 4 ; ;
0 ga -Sle 375

You are also requested to provi Ke to this Bureau
copies of those reports, including sufficient information
identifying FBI comaunications on which they were based, which
will be furnished the Senate Sclect Committee per its request
for “any other so~called ‘political trial’ or other prosecutions xP v4
brought by the Special Litigation Section of the alnborpal wn

MAIL ROOM(S“ TELETYPE UNIT] 7

Security Division." | a . df } o .
62116395 . Honk oy ae: yp 9% 8% an
RAM:ome tv. GL, a en
75K 10) @ SEE NOTE PAGE 2 ,
{ WS

6-463 (tel ° GPO 954.546

oe gg

.


Tho Attorney Cenoral

Tnagmuch as this Bureau's response to item 27 of
Appondiz C enclosed with referenced letter deponds on your
response to Ltem 26, you are requasted to furish the desired
information as soon as possible in order that we may comply with
the Senate Saloct Committes roquest. Since all reports requested
under Lten 26 vere prepared by the Department this Bureau will
take no action to provide copies of theso ronorts to tha
Comilttee.

1 ~ Tha Doputy Attorney Coneral
Attention: KE, Wilifam o'connor
Special Counsel for
intelligenca Coordination

NOTE :

Until such time as we determine what information will
be furnished the Senate Select Committee by the Department under
item 26 mentioned above we believe our response on item 27 to
the Senate Select Committee should be delayed. This will enable
us to provide material requested by the Senate Select Committee
which will correspond to information being provided by the
Department,

{ Trial material relating to Wounded-Knee case was

handled by the General Investigative Division and this part
of the request is being coordinated with SA J. C. Gordon who
supervised the Wounded~Knee case. Upon receipt of requested
information from the Department, General Investigative Division
will be notified so an appropriate response may be corvplicda
regarding Wounded-Knee matter. Intelligence Division will
conduct necessary reviews for information pertaining to other
prosecutions by "Special Litigation Section" of the Dcpertmont.

» NW 88296 Dochd:325989588 Page 147


MEMORANDUM FOR:

SUBJECT H Certification of Clearances for Classified : *
Information and Compartmented Information
.. __-~ ""6f Staff Méimbers of the Senate Select Committee

°

, oN
; NX
_ Seethaly - ors )

1. Ariingements: have been  made-86 that the Compartmented
Information Branch (CIB) of CIA ¥ Will maintain,-as a matter of common
concern, an up-to-date listing of all staff members of the Senate
Select Committee who have been certified by the Committee for
access to classified information up to and including TOP SECRET
and also those who have been certified and briefed for compartmented
information,

2, CIB will attempt to keep this listing in a current status
and telephone inquiries can be made by calling 351-5507 (IDS 143-5507)
during the hours 0800 to 1730 Monday through Friday. Periodically,
a current listing of the individuals certified will be disseminated to
members of the USIB Ad Hoc Group.

3. It is contemplated this same procedure will be followed
for the House Select Committee when certification of clearances are
received from this Committee and you will be advised when such

procedure is instituted. .
i ‘ wa Ger.
bo oe Shea 39S

° | ro ote easton s
. ohn M, Clarke
Associate Deputy to the DCI
for the Intelligence Community

Merete,
NOT RECORDED”
42° JUL 25 1975

0 wondhe 200 v ;
62-1] a

| Sud g8296 DcRGTHs9588 Page 148


DPTIONAL FORM,NO. 10 } F! 5010-106 4
. Bees @
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Assoc. Dir. ___

Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep. AD Inv.
Memorandum wri
Comp. Syst. ——
ro; Mr. J. Adams pare, 6/21/75 coe
Gen. Inv.
n fr Ident. —_____—
FROM =: Legal Couns bat —
Plon. & Eval. —
suujecT? SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE io ti

baolfé Hes
ly a ‘Rn. —_

Director See’y —_

At approximately 9:00 a.m. on May 21, 1975, retired / Hox, Lait
Special Agent Alan G. Sentinella. appeared in my office prior to ‘ss
his g@pointment to receive a subpoena and to testify at 9:30 a.m. on 5/21/75
at Washington, D.C., before the Senate Select Commiittee. I told
Mr. Sentinella that it would not be possible for me to furnish him personal
counsel prior to or during his testimony, however I felt it was appropriate
for me to furnish him certain information. I told Mr. Sentinella that he
was entitled to be represented by a personal counsel of his own choice
at any time and that if he chose to Secure the services of a private attorney
he was at liberty to do so.

Talso told Mr. Sentinella that under the rules of the Senate aw
Select Committee (Rule 6.4), a witness may be accompanied by counsel 5
during testimony and a witness who is unable to obtain counsel may
_inform the Committee of that fact and the Committee is obliged to endeavor
to obtain voluntary counsel for the witness. I told him that the rules
further provide that the failure to obtain counsel would not excuse him from
appearing and testifying.

Tasked Mr. Sentinella whether he had been given any advice
by the Committee concerning his right to counsel and whether he had received
a copy of the Committee's rules as required by regulations in the rules
(Rule 6.1). Mr. Sentinella said that he had not been so advised and he had
not been given a copy of the rules by any representative of the Committee.

PERSONNEL RECORDS UNTE

COPY RETAINED IN

I told Mr. Sentinella that as to matters other than the presence _
of personal counsel, no understanding had been reached with the Committee.

1 - Mr. Wannall 36 1¢}
1- Mr. Cregar REP. od we i ©

1 - Mr. Hotis Gs Loe oo i 63 72,

1- Mr. Mintz = AtL Ineo, a ae ees EZ

RRA
JAM:mtd (6) » HERE! REISS ASS See TAINED CONTREFEP nA

<OL By (Mi
pampcscarcens_, Ea 7

EG) Hoss

+ ad
-32989588 Page 149 ee

ad
‘
e
‘

Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

I further explained to him that the Attorney General Order relating to
responses to subpoenas would apply to him and that we had been advised

that the Department had approved a waiver of the Attorney General Order
limitation permitting his testimony, but only as to matters concerning
Martin Luther King, Jr., and Stanley David Levison, and the Southern
Christian Leadership Conference, including related matters. Itold ~

Mr. Sentinella that should the questioning involve other areas and he was

in doubt as to his authorization to respond, he could request an opportunity to
consult with the Department to secure approval for his testimonyf¢onsistent
with the terms of the Attorney General Order. I also reminded Mi\_Sentinella
that a representative of the FBI would be available during his testimony

for such consultation as he felt might be necessary. I told him that

SA Paul Daly would be available for that purpose. ~

I told Mr. Sentinella that our concern is not that matters of
historical fact might be revealed, but that testimony which might be
required of him could impair the Bureau's current efforis to discharge its
responsibilities. I explained that in specific terms what this meant was that
information that would identify sensitive sources, techniques or methods,
or that would identify confidential informants, or would expose current
investigative operations should be reserved for members of the Committee
or perhaps the Chairman of the Committee depending upon the sensitivity
of the particular information. I advised him that in the event such matters
are involved in the questioning he could request consultation and that
arrangements could be made for the answers to be supplied under appropriately
limited conditions. I told Mr. Sentinella that as to other areas of possible
testimony, the Bureau would impose no request that he decline to answer
questions.

Mr. Sentinella advised me that he understood the matters I
had explained to him and that he did not at this time feel the need of personal
counsel because he said that he did not regard the appearance as one in the
nature of a grand jury appearance. I told Mr. Sentinella that he should
be aware that his testimony would be given under oath and in the event
he made a satement that was self-incriminatory, it could be used against
him. I reminded him I was not advising him in order to deter him from
furnishing testimony, but only telling him of the protections he has under the

-2- CONTINUED - OVER

. NW 88796 Docld:32989588 Page 150


« ®
oo
od r ™~
~«

Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

Constitution against self-incrimination. He said he would keep
that matter in mind.

Mr. Sentinella said that he would like to volunteer the
results of his interview at the conclusion of the interview and he also
would like to have an opportunity to review a transcript of the testimony
for accuracy.

RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

a
(ea

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 151


oes es <n

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

S COMMUNICATIONS SECTION ®
NR O19 SF PLAIN "AY 4 HANEE

{ “Z,
7:09PM NITEL MAY 16, 1975 KEK serrAylep waa

TO: DIRECTOR (62- 116395) (ATTN: OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL) | Gen. Tav.

i Inspection
# Intell, ._
| Laboratory
{ Plan. & Eval,
i Spee. Inv. hei
Training
Legal Coun.
Telephone
Director Ace

| Assoc. Dir, |
f Dep.-A.D.-Adm._

| Comp. Syst, ___
} Ext, Affairs —_ —
f Files & Com, —_

V FROM: SAN FRANCISCO (62- ~6§887)

3

Be
SENSTUDY, 1975

RE BUREAU NITEL TO ALL OFFICES MAY 2, 1975.
ON MAY 16, 1975, FORMER SAN FRANCISCO SUPERVISOR DAVID E. TODD op

—_—— -

CALLED AND ADVISED HE HAD RECEIVED CALL FROM LESTER SEIDEL, SENATE
SELECT COMMITTEE, WANTING-TO INTERVIEW TODD RE DOMESTIC COUNTERINTEL~ [p

LIGENCE OPERATIONS, SPECIFICALLY, BLACK PANTHER PARTY. TODD SAID HE

WANTED TO BE COOPERATIVE BUT WAS APPREHENSIVE REGARDING DIVULGING

INFORMATION AS A RESULT OF HIS FBI EMPLOYMENT. HE WAS INSTRUCTED TO

IMMEDIATELY CALL COLLECT THE OFFICE OF THE LEGAL COUNSEL AT FBIHQ.

HE SAID HE WOULD DO THIS.

TODD ALSO ADVISED THAT SEIDEL HAD TOLD HIM THE COMMITTEE ALSO
WANTED TO INTERVIEW FORMER SAN FRANCISCO SUPERVISOR ALBERT P. CLARK.

b 2 -/16395~- ig

qy7 MAY 28 1975

aut ISR TON GEN TAIEND 5

Bare 3 As LID sy Pg. Ay

NWF 88296 Doclhd:32989588 Page 152

FEDERAL GURERY OF MXEEOATION
DOMMUNIGATIONS SECTION

MAY 29 we

TELETYPE

(se

NR@BS AX CODE

3:29 AMURG ENT MAY 29, 1975 DKL
TO DIRECTOR (62-116395)

FROM ALEXANDRIA (62-217) (RUC) 1 PAGE
Oe
. SENSTUDY 75.

nner :

| 43
- REBUTEL TO ALEXANDRIA, MAY 28, 1975 Ju)
ma

ON MAY 29, 1975, FORMER EMPLOYEES COURTLAND J.JONES AND
tB RNARD A. WELLS WERE CONTACTED BY ASAC MICHAEL A. MORROW,
-i

ite ACCORDANCE WITH BUREAU INSTRUCTIONS, AND FURNISHED INFORMATION
ser OUT iN REFERENCED TELETYPE.

END . 7
HOLD ALL SE RMATION Con ee oft on
SERED, SGGHTA RELY a9
one Its Pe Sunapee bn MAE
Vee
\
\
84 SUL 4a oon Come
._NW 88296 Docld:3

588 Page 153


Assoc uu. ......

} Dep-A.D.~-Adm_. |
@ Dep-A.D-Inv.._. |

+ ag Y Asst. Dir:
j ( ipl Admin ~ -
f . . . FEBERAL BUREAU CF invEstrONTIa: f Comp. Svst,
IR 992 BA CODED COMMUNICATIONS SECTION | Fis @ com. —/
} Gen. Inv.
7349 PM NITEL3730/75 JAN MAY 3.0 1975 lent.
TO: DIREGTOR (62-116395) Ox { fp inte Mt cit
TELETYP E Lateaony a

FROM: “BALTIMORE (66-3127)
“ceusttioy
RE BUTEL MAY 28, 1975.0”!

} Spee. Inv. .
} Training

if

{HE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS WERE CONTACTED ON THE INDICATED
DATES BY THE ASAG AND INSTRUCTIONS INRETEL FOLLOWED.

NORE OF THEM HAVE BEEN CONTACTED BY THE SENATE SELECT
cNITTEE STAFF TO DATE, AND EACH STATED THEY WOULD CONTACT THE
re SHOULD THEY BE CONTACTED IN THE FUTURE.

2 WAY 29, 1975 ~ ROBERT H. HAYNES, 285 NORTHMOOR DRIVE, _—
Sty ER SPRING, MARYLAND.

i “MAY 30, 1975 - ERNEST H. BELTER, 616 EDNOR ROAD, SILVER

sPRENG . WARYLAND. |

Ng

CUB
f

“Ss ack

if

Pa)

ant ate

MAY 30, 1975 - STERLING B. DONAHOE, 2815 SPIRAL LANE,

Ol Mi AND. if A. fly

ALL H. Epo
END MB ye AMO Samana

Bane M4: Wh agape _— -
a “A
Oa UO ew
6

ie
us

ce’ \ NX a”

84 JUN5 1875 \

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 154


‘Assoc. Dir.

af P , | Dep.-A.D-Adm.__.
; FENEHAL KHER A Gate j Dep-A.D. “Inv.
ob wane COMMUNIGATIONS SeoTloW |
IRE CG CODE Yio 01875 Comp. Syst of
‘ 77Pi MITEL 5/3e/75 FMM LA P f Files & Com. __. |
re eon Gen. for. ——
ff TO DIRFCTOR (62-116395) ee ee R A coe Ident.
’ j ey =F}
Intell. Ce 2fB4F <7
yh FROM CHICAGO ‘ Laboratoey af
J f Plan. & Eval
O ; Spec. Inv... #

i Training .
} Legal C —_
SFNSTIMY 75, , f Legal Coun.

i Telephone Rn.

iu!

RERUTEL MAY 28, 1975.

PURSUANT TO BUREAI INSTRUCT IONS, MISS OLGA CIFSA was
OMT ACTED FY SAC, CHICAGO, ON MAY 34, I975 RFGARNING CAPTIONSD ~
Farrer. SHE STATFD SHF STILL RESIDES 19479 SOV'TH IPMIANA

_. AVENUE, CHICAGO, AND IS STILL EMPLOYED AS AN FXFCITIVE ch /;
= SECRETARY aT THE FIRM OF FRIST Aim FRNST, ATTORNFYS, Tf!
4 ao
° CHICAGO. ~
:
" MISS CIFSA YAS ADVISFD THAT THF SFNATY CFLFCT COMMITTEE —

“HAD MANF INAUIRY AS TO HFR LAST ¥NoN ADDRFSS , INDICATING
THE POSSIPILITY THAT THEY MAY DFSIRE TO INTFRVIE! HER, CHF
WAS FUPTHER ADVISED THAT IP TH? SVENT SYP TS IMTERVIFURN ANN
AMING THE COURSE OF SAMF ANY QtT@’ ST IONS MERE ASHEN PFLATIVE
TO SENSITIVE BURFAW OPFRAT TONS: FIC,, SHE COULD REOMEPST THE
ASSISTANCE OF AN AGENT TO BF PRESENT DURING THR INTERVIFM,

AULT ORMATIOM co NEG:

HERTS UNCLA
DATS VIGOL

S4JUN5 1975

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 155


%

~ ‘PAGE TWO
SHE WAS FURTHER ADVISED THAT IF AFTER TH ae THERE

™“

WERE ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH PRFSFMTFN A AEST ION IN HER
M¥tD SHE COULD CONTACT THE PYRFAI'S LFRAL foriNery, NTYTeroN
“rr WASHINGTON, D.C., COLLECT, FOR APY ASSISTANCE THAT
NIVISION COULD AFFORR HEP,

MISS CIFSA WAS AT A LOSS TO UNDFRSTANM HY THT SENATE

SFLECT COMMITTEE WOULD DESIRE TO INTFRVIFH HER ANN ANT SRN

THAT I! ALL PPOBARILITY SHE “OULD aS! FOR THT ASSISTANCE
OF AN AGENT PRIOR TO ANSYFRIMG AMY ANESTIONS THEY MAY PROPOSE
TO HER. SHF “AS PARTICULARLY CONCFRESN THAT SHF MIGHT
INADVEPTFNTLY DISCLOSF CONFIDENT TAL INFORMATION ANN AT A RAFSILT
WOLULD FEELMUCH MORE SECIRE WERE AN AGFNT PRESENT TO ANVISF
HER.

IN THE EVENT CONTACT IS MANF THF PPRFAN MILL RE anuycrny,

EMD

HOLD

NW? 68296 Docid:32989508 Page 156

Assoc. Dir, ——s {i

ar) Dep.-A.D-AdMaces 1
. ® 4 Dep-A.DAnvineas }

; 1 Asst. Dir ,

ik [ 4 FEDERAL BUSERY OF CeveSTIaRTICN } Admin. ...——emes
Rhy! COMMUNICATIONS SECTION | Comp. Syst. —

| ji } duxt. Affairs we t

. t Files & Com. |
"se 998'om cope |’ AY 90075. t Gen Inv. |
aaa § Ident.

ew nnneeia f

/ y —
5:33PM NITEL/“5/30/75 SKH 5 TRUE rept: an

TO: DYRECTOR, FBI (S2-11 6896 | Plan. & Eval —

Spee. Inv Ww |

f 7p 2 3s enon neem bee ‘
~ pFRous OMAHA (62-3439) (P) | eeal Coan nt
‘ ; Telephone Rm...
SENSTUDY 75 Dig poy a= |
\ “ me} .

i, _ | if
VE-BUREAU NITEL, WAY 28, 1975. ul

SA ROBERT L. TAGG, WHO IS CURRENTLY ON ACTIVE DUTY

AED CURRENTLY ASSIGNED AS SENIOR RESIDENT @¢GENT, LINCOL!,
NEBRASKA, RESIDENT AGENCY, ADVISED OF CONTENTS IN RE

i
>
TELETYPE « SHOULD SA TAGG BE CONTACTED BY THE SENATE i ag
pnrrn eell
Ghecr COMMITTEE, THE RUREAU WILL BE ADVISED IEDIA.
cE.
—
: a. ua Pein ees “ nate
' a ees ARN
bang fs "Bhiyje__—

G2 Mes sph

vy JUN 4 1975

84 JUhe i975
NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 157


e

FEDERAL RURREY Gp LivEsnGazaty

COMMUNICATIONS SECH DRY

wid7 "PA Guve

. t
\sit WAY ov, 197) ungtdT whe

' My 3 vi nev lon OS MAY & 0 B78
hi APULIS (Pe xSuNalL aTTawT1lun) TEL | Ear
FRuvi¢s Gauss x (92-2535) _ SP .

C73 tw 72 oy i
neoUwi lel DAL WAY 2o, ain AWD PHUf¢NLX TeLCALL Tu
WiwdeyPULIS HAY du, 1973~
Fur LWFURMATLON UF vil wddaPOLLS FuLLuWida IS 3d1NG SET
FURTH:

INQUIRIES tape OF BUREAU BY SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (S5c)

oiflicun wie A NUMBER OF PRESENT AND FORMER FBI EMPLOYEES ,
INeL uv ine THEIN CURRENT WHEREABOUTS, SUGGESTS THEY iaY BE

ASTERVIEWED BY SSC STAFF, EXACT SU» JECT MATTERS FOR LATERVL EUS

abi NUN.
Fuavien BUREAU EWMPLOYca2S aND UFFICe OF ero
dweUro2NTS, ALL UF WHOM S5C ras Inqulrev aso

Bata UF ToHeSe Fonvlén EMPLOYEES IS TO BE LiideDIATELY

W?
Qwlatlev any ALeéxTep HAT HE (Shi)
eb PAGE UNE AN teu: iro

ie ape Te Ea A

DATE

ete TAN Hats

SET OUT BELOW ARE NAMES AND LAST KNOWN ADDRESSES OF

VX WIG $s 7 dl

Ca ae

Jun A
MIGHT Be APPROACHED BY THE

Assoc, Dir. H
Dep~A.D.-Adm. f!
Dep.-A.D.-Inv__.

Asst. Dir.: f
Admin,
Comp. Syst. WU |
Ext. Affairs

; Files & Com. —_
¥ Gen. Inv. WW

Ident. :
Inspection P
meeliyZ7Z om
Laboratory f-__. }
Plan. & Eval,
Spee. Inv.
Training Www
Legal Coun. _. WW
Telephone Row —. }
, Director, See’y

L 1975


é qe

Paun Tw
rd

Soc STAFF, SUdJeCT Walter Unddulld. THEY SHOULD SE TULD THAT
Iw ine @VewT THEY Akf INTexVidwWio add OUniwa THE cuuxnde uF
Sali, QueéSfiunsS are ASKED WHICH RkeLATE Tu S2NSITIVE BUREAU
UPenATIunS CSOURCES, sizTiOvs, TeiCoiiigludS, THiro AGENCY RULE,
AND UNGUl We -INVESTIGATIl ows) , THEY waY REQUEST THAT Ad Fol
AGdWl of Present. suUAEAU WILL PruViue addWT ul adguesT uF
InfeénViewge. AS a PreLUvd TO IsTén View, THE ForRdEn ¢uPLuYee
WAY, Alen selva CuwTavTiv oY SSC STAFF, VONTACT SUReAU'S
LeGAL CUUNSEL UI VISLUN 5Y COLLECT CaLL Fux FULL INFurdATIod
iu ~sSlsi nid, InCLuoING USsLIGATiuwS aS TO CUNFIDENTIALITY
UF LaFunsallow ACyllsep as Fol aiMPLOYdE, If 1S #elPdasizep
inal oUnfau'sS OF Fen UF asSolSTadCe {5 NuT INTEND ED TU
iuPevt SSC wUAK DUT IS vOde aS CuuPénaliVi GeSTURE AND Tu
SaFeGUARL SewSiTiVeé oURAU LwFURMATIUN. GuNTACTS wLTH
fnao Funelin EMPLUY£2S £0 o2 HAWoLev PERSUNALLY BY Sac Ox
aSaAG. fw &Viwl THiS WOT FEaSIsLé FUR JUST Cause, TU bi
HawwLav BY A SeNLUR SUPEAVESuA.

a00 Paaxt Wu

\Nw 86296 Docid:32989588 Page 159


- 4 ‘ "
Page trate @ @

i*

“PrUecWlks eilLurip £. ALSK, Llodw L1OTA vrlVvd,
e

YounG luwi, arlZuva

InVeSfieATLUs AT Yuuwalfuws, adiZosa HAS DISCLOS¢D THAT
MiLUnwwD #£, RISK 15 WUW ReSivivG gi TH Min SISTin, HS.
We Ae nilLLs, Tew MiLe Lakd, AAUKENDACK, tLNNeSOTA, Re 2,
igLePnlUwd NUviodR 216-547-3046, and WLLL pE THERE UNTIL Fall
VF THlS Year wes Sint WILL xdTUrs Tu ari dcowa.

WiwweaPULLS AagwulLé IW aCoxvancdé WITH SUREAU
inSiaucr@iuns.

mw

NW 68296 Docld:32989586 Page 160

Assoc. Diy,

,  ) Dep.-A.D.-Adm.___
4 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Dep-A.D.-Inv,___
\ ae COMMUNICATIONS SECTION “Admin
. Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs —
Files & Com, __
Gen. Inv, weet
Ident. © oe
Inspevtion .
Intell, Wye i fist |;
Labdaratayy {

Plan. & Eval, _ ;

Spee. Inv,
Tr ino
Legal Coun. .
Telephone Rm,

iY $2.0 107
i
TELETY BS

h002 AT CODE

9:53 PH NITEL MAY 29,1975 CG
TO DIRECTOR (S2-116395)
FROLIs ATLARTA (62-2854)

SENSTUDY 75 \ w jag Director x See ~
REPUTEL TO ALEXANDRIA AND OTHER OFFICES, MAY 22, 1975. peony

SA ALDEN F. MILLER, ATLANTA DIVISION, ALERTED TO POSSIPRILITY OF

CONTACT BY SSC. SA MILLER HAS NOT BEEN CONTACTED TO DATE. IW THE EVENT
ONEECT LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION WILL 8E IMMEDIATELY ADVISED THRCUGH I

THE Esa, {Yh
of wv

2 Ee

ALL INBQRMARICN CONTIN 7)
REREL im) a 74) é a POO:
CATE ~ a OG: BT Aves

a]
kena mere Teyy ey
: roe (arn

a

+

‘ =
UN 7 i ne
Prem Fo ”

° REC-100 (" ne
az 67M AO
975 PER: , ox gp sul 4 1915
{

a:

84 JUNS
NW! 88296 Docid:329895288 Page 161


PO ROSS ee Se

Assoe Dir, .-
Dep.~A.D.-Adm.__.. K
} Dep.-A.D-Inv.4.
j Asst. Dir.:

Admin, —,—___.
§ Comp. Syst. —W
§ Ext. Affairs . })
4 Files & Com. —.
& Gen. Inv,

> Je FEDERAL BUREAU CF ENYESTICATIBN 9
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

NR G9 AT COE MAY 30 1878. 70) abd.
We 158 PM NIT May 39,1975 vce TELETYP -
N ra

(62-1 16395)

Inspection 4 L
lnowene
4 Laberat: ony" 4
i, Plan. & Eval. — }

FROM: ATLANTA (62-2854) N Spee. Inv. —— |

ATTENTION: INTD - ¥. 0. CREGAR x,
(cooston ov

(-7
DURING A MEETING WITH REGINAL Nanpur EDITOR, THE ATLANTA

Lefoval COUT. ~ecenmee
'¢ Telephone Rit, = |

«

CONSTITUTION, MAY 29,1975, MURPHY I GENERAL CONVERSATION ADVISED

SAC, ATLANTA, THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A NUMBER OF TELEPHONE CALLS FROM

THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE, WASHINGTON, D. C., SEEKING AN INTERVIEW
WITH HIM. MURPHY SAID HE HAD AGREED TO A MEETING WITH A MEMBER OF THE ay.

COMMITTEE, NAME NOT STATED, AND DID SO SOMETIME APPARENTLY WITHIN +

* (OI SIGE Pe

i

THE LAST WEEK. MURPHY INDICATED THE INTERVIEW CONCERNED MARTIN LuTaRR
KING. MURPHY VOLUNTEERED HE WAS UNABLE TO ANSWER MANY OF THE QUESTIONS
ASKED SINCE HE WAS WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OF THE EVENTS AND THAT SOME OF

THE INDIVIDUALS HE WAS QUESTIONED ABOUT ARE NOW DECEASED. HE SPECIFI-

CALLY REFERRED TO FORMER EDITOR, RALPH¥MC GILL, ATLANTA CONSTITUTION,

UNBECORDED COPY FILED IN

: we
Now DECEASED » AND INDICATED THAT THE INQUIRY (CONCERNED INFORMATION IT

WAS FELT COULD BE PROVIDED BY MC GILL. MURPHY WAS NEVER SPECIFIC IN

HIS CONVERSATION AND NO EFFORT WAS MADE TO OBTAIN FURTHER DETAILS
END PAGE ONE

Cf” \
| (ie ) eta tM
Ree r ! 6617 ; bo -fl /, ay
ce J 0° AT ON cont ANED HO? 7 > an } y )

\
Da UNGLASSIES, yr Wn’ WAW os sun 4 1975
7 | ob “EE ot, Sey

ERE

LS 4; " °
8.4 Jui Be wren" *


PAGE Two CT 62-2854)
SINCE IT WAS OBVIOUS HE DID NOT WISH TO EXPAND ON THE COMMENTS MADE
BY HIM.

MURPHY INDICATED ALSO THAT THE PERSON OR PERSONS INTERVIEWING
HIM FELT HE, MURPHY, SHOULD HAVE SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND HE IS NOT
SURE HE WAS ABLE TO CONVINCE THEM THAT HE DID NOT. FROM THE COMMENTS
MADE BY MURPHY, IT WAS THE IMPRESSION OF THE Sac THAT MURPHY WAS
PRESSED FOR DETAILS WHICH HE WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE.
END
FBIHQ FLC CLR TKS

| NW 68296 Docid:32989588 Page 163


CODE TELETYPE NITEL
5/28/75
| J TO SACS ALEXANDRIA NEWARK
a ATLANTA OMAHA 1 - Mr, B, Adams
i ih BALTIMORE PHILADELPHIA 2 - Mr. J. A, Mintz
A CHARLOTTE PORTLAND (1-Me.J,B.Hotis)
CHICAGO PHOENIX
KANSAS CITY TAMPA PERSONAL ATTENTION
LITTLE ROCK WFO
1 - Mr, W. R. Wannall
FROM DIRECTOR FBI (62-116395) 1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar
oe me 1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips

—‘SENSTUDY 75 suurene-eest cena
REBUTEL MAY 2, 1975. Jo bor FVAS acy)
INQUIRIES MADE OF BUREAU BY SENATE SELECT mr mE CSBC)
CONCERNING A NUMBER OF PRESENT AND FORMER FBI EMPLOYEES, IN-
CLUDING THEIR CURRENT WHEREABOUTS, SUGGESTS THEY MAY BE INTER-
VIEWED BY SSC STAFF, EXACT SUBJECT MATTERS FOR INTERVIEWS UN-
KNOW. SET OUT BELOW ARE NAMES AND LAST KNOWN” ADDRESSES OF

FORMER BUREAU EMPLOYEES AND. OFFICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF” INCUMBENTS,
REC- 100

ALL OF WHOM SSC HAS INQUIRED ABOUT. yc / V4 a
EACH OF THESE FORMER EMPLOYEES IS TO BE atkes LY Td

TACTED AND ALERTED THAT HE (SHE) MIGHT BE APPROACHED BY, THE
Assoc. Dir, 1 - ROME (BY MATL)

Dep AD Ine - ‘7 JUN 4 1975..
Acai, Dine Nome oO Ae w aft

Admin, +

Aden SEE NOTE-RAGE FOUR TY £ Vi

Ext. Affairs . . a

Files & Com. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION a) 7, "S.

eae COMMUNICATIONS SECTION Ps wy

Inspection ° ‘ & } (Ay ~

nto, oa ia

breton — MAY 2 (975 hh ie) | , oo . ve ml

Plan. & Eval. 2 iC sol ied "4 PUA a * \°

Spec. Inv. ake sel f os 3
Tesinins A TELETYPE i /) \
Telephon @ Rin / / . aa xs ;
S sepiy, heb Mkt room (“) TELETYPE UNIT a A : ae f 4 _ apo wif!

NW 88296 Docld: 32989588 Page 164 erect,

iva


-w OG ¢

{

NW 85296 Docid:32989508 Page 165

TELETYPE TO SACS ALEXANDRIA ET AL
RE: SENSTUDY 75
62-116395

SSC STAFF, SUBJECT MATTER UNKNOWN, THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THAT
IN THE EVENT THEY ARE INTERVIEVED AND DURING THE COURSE OF SAM,
QUESTIONS ARE ASKED WHICH RELATE TO SENSITIVE BUREAU OPERATIONS
(SOURCES, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, THIRD AGENCY RULE, AND ONCOTNG
INVESTIGATIONS), THEY MAY REQUEST THAT AN FBI AGENT BE PRESENT,
BUREAU WILL FROVIDE AGENT OM REQUEST OF INTERVIEUEE, AS A
PRELUDE TO INTERVIEW, THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEING
CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION
BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING
OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS
FBI EMPLOYEE, IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE
IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPEDE SSC WORK BUT IS DONE AS COOPERATIVE
GESTURE AND TO SAFEGUARD SENSITIVE BUREAU INFORMATION. CONTACTS
WITH THESE FORMER EMPLOYEES TO BE HANDLED PERSONALLY BY SAC OR
ASAC, IN EVENT THIS NOT FEASIBLE FOR JUST CAUSE, TO BE HANDLED
BY A SENIOR SUPERVISOR,

INCUMBENT EMPLOYEES TO BE ADVISED THAT IF CONTACTED BY SSC
STAFF FOR INTERVIEW, LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION. TO BE IMMEDIATELY

NOTIFIED THROUGH SAC.

TELETYPE TO SACS ALEXANDRIA ET AL
RE: S@NSTUDY 75
62-116395
IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONTACT, RESULTS SHOULD BE FURNISHED
BUREAU BY TELETYPE IN ABOVE CAPTION. IF A FORMER EMPLOYEE WO
LONGER IN YOUR TERRITORY OR TEMPORARILY AWAY, SET OUT LEAD TO
OTHER OFFICE IMMEDIATELY WITH COPY TO FBI HEADQUARTERS,
ALEXANDRIA: COURTLAND J. JONES, 6607 N. 29TH STREET,
ARLINGTON, VA.; ROBERT G, KUNKEL, SAC; BERNARD A,’ WELLS,

5311 MONTGOMERY STREET, SPRINGFIELD, VA.

ATLANTA: ALDEN F, MILLER

BALTIMORE: ERNEST H, BELTER, 616 EDNOR ROAD, SILVER SPRING,

. MARYLAND; STERLING B, BDONAHOE, 2813 SPIRAL LANE, BOWIE, MARYLAND;

ROBERT H,. HAYNES, 205 NORTHMOOR DRIVE, SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND
CHARLOTTE: JOSEPH A. SIZOO, 84A PINE CRESCENT, WHISPERING PINES,

NORTH CAROLINA

CHICAGO: OLGA CIESA, 10409 S. INDIANA AVENUE, CHICAGO,
ILLINOIS

KANSAS CITY: BILL D, WILLIAMS, SAC

LITTLE ROCK: JOHN J, CREAMER, JR., ASAC

NEWARK: JOHN J. CONNOLLY; RITA AGNES AMBROSTIO,
1604 JOHN STREET, FORT LEE, NEW JERSEY; RALPH WV. BACHMAN,

610 NORWOOD DRIVE, WESTFIELD, NEW JERSEY; KARL L. BROUSE,

~3-

\ NW 88296 Docid:32989508 Page 166

TELETYPE TO SACS ALEXANDRIA ET AL
RE: SENSTUDY 75
62~116395

5 BURRINGTON GORGE, WESTFIELD, WEY JERSEY.

OMAHA: ROBERT L. TAGE

PHILADELPHIA: JOHN B, MEADE

PORTLAND: LEO B, APP, JR.; EDGAR O, INGALLS

PHOENIX: MILDRED E, RISK, 11830 113TH DRIVE, YOUNGTONN,
ARIZONA

TAMPA: “MICHAEL J, ROZAMUS, 6509 GULF DRIVE, HOLMES BEACH,
FLORIDA

WeO: JAMES J, GAFFNEY; ELMER L. TODD

ROME: THOMAS J. BIAMONTE; JOSEPH C, MICHE LA; HELEN C.. SPEAR
COPY TO ROME, WITH ITS EMPLOYEES NAMED, BY MAIL.

NOTE: May 14, 1975, SSC letter and appendices requested current
whereabouts individuals named herein. Also included herein names
of Bachman and Brouse who were SAC and ASAC respectively in Newark
Office pertinent period inasmuch as one request from SSC vas for
emoranda from former SA Leo T. Clark to Newark SAC and ASAC.
SSC request named several additional former employees who were
previously alerted by tel to selected officers 5/2/75. Another
5/2/75 tel, to all offices, referenced herein, gave field general
background re Senstudy 75, By separate airtel to Rome we are
foryvarding copy of instant tel as well as copies of prior pertinent
tels, The caution taken herein in alerting former employees as
well as incumbents is same we took previously by 5/2/75 tel to
selected SACs, After dispatch instant tel, copies will be ‘filed
in personnel files of all named herein. One of the 1964 Rome
employees was Theodore A. Korontjis, currently assigned INTD,
who will be appropriately informed orally concerning this matter,

ante
Ko w, iv ae
“re (N74
“a | p

_ NW 88296 Docid:32589588 Page 167


woot ¢ 2 - J. A. Mintz
- s
‘ - Mr. 3. B. Hotis)
nd 1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall
1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar
1 - Mr. T. E. Burns
The Attorney General Hay 20, 1975
' Director, FBI
| © ALL RORMATION CONTAINED
| of UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (cri ae RPO AIL
\ OM INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES teks AEDT

—_——owm

AR NA ects hememanentsts i

Reference is made to memorandum and appendices | iP
thereto, from the Senate Select Committee dated April 30, 1975,
re requesting documents and other information from the FBI,

Item number thiee of referenced Commun}eation requests -
that a Senate Select Committee Staff Representative be
authorized te examine certain portions of the FBI Manual or
Rules and Regulations, (MRR), ak the FBI Offices. The |
material requested, MRR Part I, Section nine: Part II, Sections
one thru nine, has been segregated and is available for
examination at PBI Headquarters.

Enclosed for your approval and forwarding to the
Comittee is an original of a memorandum advising the Senate
Select Committee that the above requested material is
presently available for examination at FBI Headquarters.

\
| your records.
4

Enclosures (2)

TEB: emea

(8)

i: aN
M, OOM _ — uNnIT [_]

588 Page 168

A copy of this memorandum is being furnished for

, 62-216395 <a

aig ey

bat
pee DO

+ &

( as
ae wach eb APR! “a -
vir J fot ¢ o he
of Cont 2, 97 $129 /av
AN <i, ‘) -
= %

<b]

q7 JUN 4 19%

662.4 in gS
—)

( ye 7%
~
v
as

(uw . 0 a

REECE SD

GPO : 1975 O - 569-920


re 9 2= @ J. A. Mintz
. . w ~~ Mr. 3. B. Hotis)
1 - Mr. W. R. Wannail
1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar
1 - Mr. Tf. E. Burns
G2-LEG395 May 20, 1975

VULEED STATES SENATE SELECY COMLMTTEE
TO STUDY COVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVETIES

RE; MANUAL OF RULES AND REGULATIONS

Reference is made to monoranden, with attached
appendices, dated Oprii 30, 1975, requesting cortain docunonts
and other information from the PBI,

Pursuant to your remuicet to review the PBI lanual
of Rules and Regulations Park I, Section nine; and Part iT,
Sections one thru wine, we currently have ouch material
available for revicw at PRI Headquarters by appropriately
eieared personnel of the Committee.

i ~ The Attorney General

at ALLINFORT ” URCATAINER
TEBsomec/*

: PERT ALL ep. oe
rome One } it 6 Sab ALayfe—
NOTE:

The MRR sections described above have been reviewed by
the appropriate FBIHQ Divisions and approved for examination in
their entirety by Committee Staff Members with the following
exceptions: MRR, Section 3, page 15 (j).(1) The phrase

JS "Baltimore Source 4" has been deleted; Section 4, page 6, 20.

ye The phrase "i.e., selective service records in other than
selective service cases, Baltimore Confidential Source 4

Assoc. Dr.___inEormation, etc." has been deleted. Excisions will be explained
Dep. AD Adm. £0 Committee reviewers at the time of review by indicating
wer wl —the excisions related to sensitive confidential sources and
Adnin.___Dave been made in order to protect sotrces' identity. These
Comp. Sys __ources will not be further identified to Committee members _/_/,
bt Ate —nor will the term “Balt more Source 4" be utilized. iat

Gen. Inv.
Ident.

ot
“sy

ae
Inspection —__

Pe ; NOTE CONTINUED PAGE 2
Intell.

Loboratory Vv Gy " aueyee Vp iG
Spot VEE ro, a
‘

Training

\ a ty
egal Coun. a wy Ne
Teishane Rm. — wu y oo. Uk G aS 3 / 2/7
Director Sec'y MAIL, ROOM TELETYPE UNIT [_] (ua Er SLOSUTE
' NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 169


MANUAL OF RULES AND REGULATIONS

NOTE CONTINUED:

The MRR sections to be made available are described
by number and heading as follows:

Part I
Section
Part IT

Section

og

1-

Information

Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section
Section

Section

NW 85296 Docid:32989508 Page 770

2-
3-

\o oo sod fo) ui i
|

Disciplinary Matters

Authority--Training--Submission of

Supervision~--Availability~-Resident Agencies
Administration of Offices

Communications

Dissemination of Information

Publications, Press, and Public Contacts
Payments~-Property

Miscellaneous Regulations

Classification~~-Character--Copies-~
Abbreviations.


¢ ~. a ones oe

'
« 5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION €
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

| Addressee: __SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
| COLTR ric, (-) Memo _[_] Report dated____ 5/20/75
; Caption of D United States Senate Select Committee
| apron orseesmen+o Study Governmental Operations
with Respect to Intelligence Activities
Re: Manual of Rules and Regulations

Originating Office: ait E

Delivered by: [v2

“WReceived by:

. Title: |
R ;

eturn this receipt ‘othe Intelligence Division, FBI

ue

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNSLASSIFIE
DATE aror BY

re 3a!) 7

QSURE
NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 171 ENCLOS

|

aw

May 30, 1975
c 2- Mr. S. F. Phillips

CC
MATERIAL FOR SEMATE..SELECT, COMMITIEE. (SSC)
INVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

1. TITLE/SUBJECT: Sections of the FBI Manual
of Instructions Not Previously Furnished.

2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION: FBI

3. NATURE OF MATERIAL: Letterhead memorandum (LHM)
4, DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified

5. NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP: NA

6. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: LM refers to a raquest
of the SSC for review privileges of certain designated
Sections of the FBI Manual of Instructions. The LHM advises
that all but one of the requested Sections is being made
available for review at FBI Headquarters and that the excluded
Section will be made available for review after clearance by
other interested agencies as it involves third agency considera-
tions.

en

/

7. REQUESTOR/DATE OF REQUEST: SSC. 4/30/75. Repty
refers to Part 2 of the-request.

8. RELEASING AUTHORITY: FBI
9. DATE OF SUBMISSION: 5/19/75
10. LOCATION OF FILE COPY: FBI file 62-116395

11. RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS:

Agsoc. Dir.
Dep. AD Adm. =

Third agency considerations involved in one of the

Training

éega oun, DAT & - fe
velo ax / ey SAA, — i
ne Rm. tenes
Director Sec'y __ MAIL ROOM(_} ‘TELETYPE UNIT —— GPO 934-545
nugbedod lildefu:3ARBbss Page 172

Dee AO Inv Manual Sections requested by the SSC. \
Sst 4
Admin a re a

sar SEP: kw fiw 5 7
com ty ee OR RECIOO bain iS
Fig 116395 Pon bos pets
Inemcin NOTE: Original via liaison to Central Souminity I
intel. Connection with Senstudy 75.
Laborstory Cilicia? Glee) Cah

7) 9

Plan. & Eval. ALL Ia rh. we Avis)
Spee. Inv. HER aus SCONTAR IED gy MUN 4 1975 = jy -


d >

May 30, 1975

2-Mc.S:F.Phillips

a

MATERIAL FOR SENATE SELECTCOMMITTER (SSC)
THVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

1, TITLE/SUBJECT: FBI Manual of Rules and Regulations
2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION: FBI

3. NATURE OF MATERIAL: Letterhead memorandum (LHM)

4, DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified

5, NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP: NA

6, SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: LHM refers to a request of the
‘SSC for review privileges of certain designated Sections of
the FBI Manual of Rules and Regulations. The LHM advises that
the desired Sections are being made available for review at
FBI Headquarters.

7. REQUESTOR/DATE OF REQUEST: SSC. 4/30/75. Reply
pertains to Part 3 of the SSC request. _

ALL INZOK, aes
8, RELEASING AUTHORITY: FBI MECH Shee age

DATE TEE ies y
9, DATE OF SUBMISSION: 5/20/75 ality

10, LOCATION OF FILE COPY: FBI file 62-116395.
11. RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS; None.

SFP: ekw ,
(4) Ryu) hya fe Sythe, “4 KR
we pos FIN LS

Assos. ov, _62-116395 a Ak
Dep. AD Adm. _ at
hae iw. NOTE: Original via liaison to Central Community index in &£
Ani. comnection with Senstudy 75. if. a /
Co on Syst. ¥ ba rae pained i
Ext. Affairs S .
Gen Re a7 JUN 4 1975

Ident. 0

Inspoction

Intell. _
Laboratory ny
Plan. & Eval, —
Spec, Inv.

Training
Legal Coun,
Telephone Rm. _.. ,
taal Sect IPEROOM () TELETYPE unITC_] GPO 954-545
1
ae’ ita ebises Page 173


ad 6 ,
- é., Counsel Division

(1 -~ J. B. Hotis)
- Mr. W. R. Wannall
Mr. W. 0. Cregar

- Ur. Lb. F. Schwartz

The Attorney General May 19, 1975

a an
1

A) 1 - Mr. D. R. Dickson
"y Director, FBI

-
a
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT.
COMMITTEE OU INTELLIGENCE RCTIVITIES

ee me A See ce

\w) ye

Reference is made to memorandum from the Senate
Select Comnittee dated April 30, 1975, anid appendices
thereto requesting certain documents and other information
fron the Pederal Bureau of Investigation, .
i.
Attached for your approval and forwarding to the «= ““._
Committee is the original of a memorandum which constitutes” ~~~ —
a partial response to the request set forth in referenced
memorandum. Processing of the additional requests is
continuing on an expeditious basis and further responses
will be forthcoming.

A copy of the memorandum for the Committee is

being provided for your records. 1 ae tee
ae f
. wf
Enclosures (2) wv figs faeges
: ef ae feo - oot
62-116395 _ ° / Ven ues ae, C ikom op .
~ . ALL teymaar TON CONTAINED ced

te BECO Nos, PY pro
pap stel 7 DE LAS-Of iy (FR Dil uf j )
REC:

pe

iv . :
po : we
Assoc. Dir. — _ Jt te ab ware eS
Dep. AD Adm. _ . ‘ca RS . aN . seer
Dep. AD Inv, mo . & vA _f on]
Asst. Dies: hee _. 7 2, wo fe

Admin. - 2 =

Comp. Syst. Dee * a

Ext. Affairs PUB at XN

Files & Com. __ CED
LB

Gen. Inv,

Ident,
Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory
Plon. & Eval, f at
Spec. Inv, ‘ :

Training
Legal Coun. of

Telephone Rm. . t
Sider see fas room] TELETYPE UNIT (_] GPO 954-546

NW"88296 Becta 9588 Page 174


2 ~ gpgal Counsel Division
We ' & t — Mr. J. B. Hotis)
na 1 Wir. WwW. R. Wannall

1~ Mr. W. 0. Cregar
L- Mr. b. F. Schwartz
1 - Mr. D. R. Dickson

62~L16395 Bay 19, 1975

QHITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEES
TO STUDY GOVERSUENTAL OPERATIONS
WEER RESPLCT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE: GECTIONS OF FHE MANUAL OP
INGERUCTIONS NOE PREVIOUSLY FURNISHED

oe
a?
Reference in made tocthe memorandum fron captioned
Committes dated April 30, 1975, and appendices thereto which
contained requests for certain documents and other infoerna~
tion from the Pederal Buranu of Investigation,

Part 2 of the request concerned Sections of the
Manual of Instructions Mot Previously Produced. Parsuant
to your request, Sections 4, 88, 19, 23, 27, 28, 29, 75,
78, 50, 103, 134, 136, 144, and 146 are nov available for
raview by Me. Uark Gitenstion, or ether designated mombers
of the Committes’s staff at PRE Headquarters.

Section 102, which you requested, is net available
for review at this time because this Section involves
third agency considerations. When this Section has heen
Glearcd by the other interested agencies for review, you
will be imiediately advised.

| 1 ~ The Attorney General HERS Sh 7a
DATE
i DED eRe A ,
(9
pe’
NOTE:
ssoc, Dir.
\ Deo AD Adm. — Section 4 coordinated with SA James E. Reilly, an
be om — Division 2; Section 8R, with SA Charles D. Neudorfer,
Admin. — Division 12; Sections 19 and 90 with SA J. D. Domzalski, A
Conp. ys. Division 9; Sections 27, 28, 29, 78, 134, and 144 with Pore

Ew. Affeis — ga J, William Hines, Division 6; Sections 23, 75, 136, and

Gen. Inv. 146 with SA D. R. Dickson, Division 5; Sections 102 and

i
wert. 303 with SA.: R. L. Moore, Division 5. Section 102 being ; .
pepestion —— coordinated by SA L. F. Schwartz with other interested
Loboratory Government agencies. ps, = -
Plon. & Eval. — Coes

Specs Inve — M1 ,proms CONTINUED PAGE 2 pe
eran a eur wel
DiecirSec'y_— MATL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT [_] be. “ 2. -f / fs RY ") we i y ] ‘ys GPO : 1975 © - 569-920
NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 175 , AN 1 ¥


Sections of the Manual of
Instructions Not Previously Furnished

c

s

NOTE CONTINUED :

Listed below are the above-mentioned Sections
and their subjects.

Section Subject
4 Surveillances and Raids
8R Data Processing Section, Computer Systems
Division
19 Applicant and Employee Investigations
Conducted for Other Agencies
23 Bomb Threats
Explosives and Incendiary Devices
27 Civil Rights
_ 28 Civil Rights Act of 1964
29 Conspiracy
75 Neutrality Matters
78 Passports and Visas
90 Selective Service Act
102 Coordination with Other Government Agencies
103 : Foreign Police Cooperation
134 Assauiting the President of the United States

and Threats to the President of the
United States

136 Antiriot Laws
144 Police Killings
146 Protection of Foreign Officials and Official

Guests of the United States

~2-

NW 60296 Docld:32999508 Page 176


= ALS APP RREATIONS > OUNIED N

HEPURIN KN pth too: ig
‘BATE Led oAT py Pode y

q

oy .
r 1 y 5-140 (Rev, 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIGN
i. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535 .

\

tor
' ywdAddressee: d 5

COLTR Gf} LHM [)Memo [CjReport dated_____ 5/19/75.

Caption of Document:United States Senate Select Committe
to Study Governmental Operations with Respect |

to Intelligence Activities
Re: Sections of the MOI not

D revi ously

_ Delivered by: 4

rpetocsived by:
4

. Title: CHeat # PA
Return this receip#tdé“he Intelligence Division, FB

ae
ae WG
NW 86296 Docld:329695868 Page 177 . ~


eit
hd

a
@

-

1 - Mr. T. J. Jenkins - Enc
1 -—- Mr. J. B. Adams — Enc
1 - Mr. J. J. McDermott —- Enc
1 -—- Mr. D. W. Moore - Enc
The Athomey Geroral T- Mr. J. A. HAOtes, 1975
i! 1 -—- Mr. J. B. Hotis - Enc
, : 1 - Mr. P. V. Daly - Enc
Dincetor, FUT 1 -Mr. W. R. Wannall — Enc
iM (Attn: W. O. Cregar)
,

C2
° THETOD SPATS SEAN
SRLOOT COMMTTRI OF TTS LiSEECH AGEIVEZIES

yh 65
References if matic a; he Aotiar frem the captionad
Comiitbes dated fmril 28, 1975, gddrewecl to th: Wenorable

dvard B, tovi, attorney Genoral, requesting information
concermixa tha Poedern) Buronu of Invcostioebion.

ttach<d fer your approval and forvanding to
tho Comiitioa is Khe original aE & MtMerandum in rosronse
to the afoeremonttened romcet. A copy is enclosed for your records.

for your information, to did furmish umty boxcs for —
the usa of former Assistant to the Dircakor of tha Pederal ee
Bursau of Invcetigation, Joan BP. Eohr, at the msidenca of tha 7: |
late Director, d. Rdcar Hoover, subsequent to the death of el
ie. Tolcom. This material was brought to tho residence by «
Glorical emplaycee who norely dceresited the material and icft
the residences. While we hava no dircek knowledgo as to what
material vas removed from the residence. Hr. Nohr was contactad
to determins tha sourec and accuracy of the story contained in
"PerLescope" secbion of the April 28, 1975, issue of Heusceok,
at which tims he advised ue thet "furnishings" at the home hed
becorh removed by members of the family and the housckeapar. We
have not contacted former employees concerning this rocucst.
~ Gur contact with Mr. Bohr wes prior to tho a) of this oe

- ALLS g77e wig le ao yy
J Enclosures (2} Hite oh gk UES =SRDOALY y?
fay
te DATE ,
PVD: eekas m
(11) SEE NOTE PAGE 2 ba, ¢
ASsoc. Dir. an ahh (2
: Dep. AD Adm. __ y ' REC-1, “Luy ,
% Dep. AD Inv. ? . 5 A 4975
Ast, its eee a Sie er ye JUN 4

—— pos ae by
Comp. Syst. —_. oh
Ext. Affoirs —_ i me .  Saea ee
Files & Com ;

Gen. Inv.
Ident.

Inspection .___

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval, Va,

Spec. Inv. “| } V4

Training gf
Legal Coun,

Telephone Rm. co a 8 # .
Director Sec'y,  - MATL ROOM[_] ‘TELETYPE uNIT (_] af od /- pr SPO 954-545

| Siviieszo¢ “poctldbinsse Page 178 sy


~ e "te ‘ ay . . ©
~ N
as . baal

Letter from Director, FBI to Attorney General
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE
ACTIVITIES

NOTE: By memorandum dated May 2, 1975, from Legal Counsel
to J. B. Adams, each Assistant Director was requested to

| advise whether they or personnel in their divisions had any
knowledge relating to the allegation that the FBI directed
or participated in the removal of documents from the late
Director's residence. The Alexandria and Washington field
offices were separately requested to respond to this allegation.
The responses were negative. External Affairs, by memo from
D. W. Moore to Mr. Jenkins dated May 5, 1975, captioned
Clyde A. Tolson, former Associate Director; advised that a
clerk brought packaging material to the residence at the
request of former Assistant to the Director, John P,.Mohr.
This memo indicated that the clerk deposited the material
and left. He did not participate in the packing, etc., of
documents.

1 NW 80296 Docld:32989588 Page 179

’
‘: ‘ “ , .
a? 2 a \
wo . 7 . e

May 9, 1975

UNITED STATES SENATE
SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

REQUEST PERTAINING TO DOCUMENTS REMOVED FROM
: RESIDENCE OF FORMER DIRECTOR
J. EDGAR HOOVER

Reference is made to letter dated Anril 28,
1975, to the Attorney General from Chairman of captioned
Committee which contained a request for certain infer—
mation from the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

. Yhe Pedersl Burean of Investigation haa nok
removed, nor caused to be removed, documents from the
residence of former Federal Bureau of Investigation
Directar 3. Eéqar Hoover, subsequent to the death of
Mr. Clyde A. Tolgen, former Associate Director of the
Federal Bureat of Investigation.

It is-our understanding, -hovever, thet. former
Assistent to the Director, John P. Mohr, may have some
knovledge as te what material may have been removed -
“from the residence after Mr. Tolsen's death.

1-Mr. T. J. Jenkins (Detached)
1-Mr. J.-B. Adams (Detached) .
1-Mr. J. J..McDermott (Detached)
1-Mr. D. W. Moore (Detached)
1-Mr. W. R. Wannall (Detached)
(W. 0. Cregar)

1 Mr. J. A. Mintz (Detached)
1-Mr. J. B. Hotis (Detached)
1~Mr. P. V. Daly (Detached)

. - ego ph, ems
ewer tee ee

PVD: lgp
(11)

|. iu 0S
NWF 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 180


3-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ’

Addressee:

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20535

__Senate Select Committee

CULTR (COLHM (&] Memo [Report dated ___D-9-75

Caption of Document:Request Pertaining to Documents Removed

' Originating we
| y
Delivered by:

‘Received by:

L NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 181

from Residence of Former Director J. Edgar
Hoover.

Deter 52! TSO Ea

ENCLOSURE

@ ®
June 3, 1975

Oo 2- Mr. S. F. Phillips

./ MATERIAL FOR SENATE SELECU-~COMMITIEE (SSC)
{ INVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITTES

1. TITLE/SUBJECT: Legal Authorities of the FBI
_2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION: FBI

3. NATURE OF MATERIAL: Letterhead memorandum (LHM)
enclosing a copy of a memorandum dated November 1, 1974,
from the Assistant Attorney General for Administration,
Glen E, Pommerening to the Director of the FBI, captioned
"Federal Employee Security Program, Executive Order 10450."'

4. DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified
5. NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP: WA

6. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS:

The LHM refers to a request of the SSC for certain
documents, The LHM serves as a cover communication for the
aforementioned 11/1/74 memorandum which contains certain
supplemental instructions the Department of Justice furnished
the FBI with regard to Executive Order 11785 amending Executive
Order 10450. The instructions concerned the FBI's conduct of
intelligence-type investigations.

7. REQUESTER/DATE OF REQUEST: SSC. 3/19/75 The
response pertains to Part I of the SSC. letter of request.

8. RELEASING AUTHORITY: FBI ALL IVF ORMATION CONTAINED
iz. 3 Fl we

HESS 1B UNOLASSIF .
Avec: Oi —— «9, DATE OF SUBMISSION: 5/16/75 PATE LEAS-OL BY Wiz)
Dep. AD tov. — a v *.
“won. 410, LOCATION OF FILE COPY: FBI file 62-116395 ~ pe wz
Comp. Syst. —. oe i fw"
Fe con 11, RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNTIY PROBLEMS: None.
lien. 62116395 ere ”
inspection aa ae ~ 4
ine. SEP eek OY / ae 2
Pee & tea NOTE: Original via liaison to Central comm Index i: BP.
See. inv. -—eonnection with Senstudy 75. gece (gd. [/ ests
Telotone ~~ az JUN 4 1975
Director Sec'y- MAIL ROOMCL] TELETYPE UNIT) PO 94345

n& dade beiia:39ko5e8 Page 182 | oe ee


¢ e

2-Mr. S. F. Phillips
June>2, L975

rd ©
} MATERIAL FOR SENATE SELECT COMMITTER (SSC)
f |  TAVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ~
1. YITLE/SUBJECT: Policies and Procedures of the FBI

ORIGINALING ORGANIZATION: FBI

2
3, NATURE OF MATERIAL: Letterhead memorandum (LHM)

4, DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified / ~
- / d
5. NATIONAL SECURITY ISFORMATION STAMP: NA yg

6. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS:

In response to a request from the SSC for certain
documents and other information from the FBI concerning its
policies and procedures, the LHM advised that the FBI vas
deferring action on one document to the U. S. Department of
Justice inasmuch as that document originated with that
Department. The document involved was a memorandum from
the Attorney General to the Director, FBI, captioned
"“Mierophone Surveillance," dated 5/20/54.

7, REQUESTER/DATE OF REQUEST: SSC. 3/19/75. Pertains to
Part IV of request.

8. RELEASING AUTHORITY: FBI fi ia /
NG (y. -[16 3 $5 ET

9. DATE OF SUBMISSION: 4/18/75

; eee Jt o£ PS75
[| Agsoe. Dir. 10. LOCATION OF FILE Copy: FBI file 62-116395 ‘+ Jeng
Dep. AD Adm, _ eect |’ becca
| oe 11. RELATION TO INTELLIGEICE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS: None.
Admin, . a ] aot
Comp. Syst. syst. 62 - 116395 N, ty af £ AS
| Be Mises —sop ralew (4) <4 yw v| hss
ney OTE: Original via liaison to Central Community mex in
hesction —egnnection with Senstudy 75. ; a
rien 8 Eval ALL INEOR RATION CONTAINED tal
Spee. Ine BoA lt fy By ie oo WY
Legal Coun — DATE aye. —
oe a . _ MAIL ROOM[_] =TELETYPE UNIT (__] EPO 934-545
Bu 28286 4bolhtiistos0d0¥ Page 183

ge -


|

|

al
I

Legal Counsel Division
1m Mr, d, C, Farrington

fhe Attorney General May 6, 1975
1 =~ Mr, W. R. Wannall
l { Director, FBI 1 ~ Mr, W. 0, Cregar
;
ey

C
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE ACT EVE TIES"
na nett RD AE secre EEN ee 0
fo

Reference is made to a letter: from the Senate
Select Committes dated Mareh 19, 1975, requesting certain
documents and other information From the FBI,

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the
Committee is the original of a memorandum which responds to
a Specific request by the Committee for a position paper
dated July 31, 1972, concerning the "Seope of FST Authority,
Jurisdiction And Responsibility in Domestic intelligence
Investigations," A copy of this memorandum is enclosed for
your records,

Mel,
ol

by

Mami
SO hey Z

ipo.
Ca

Le

You will note that the position taken by the FBI -----
is that the requested position paper of July 31, 1972, is an
internal deliberative document which is the direct basis for
a formal statement on FBI authority to conduct internal
security investigations embodied in a memorandum from the
Director, FBI, to the Attorney General dated August 7, 1973,

On this basis we are stating in our response to the Committee

to» f= that we feel it inappropriate that the duly 31, 1972, paper
pee be made available, We believe that this position is completely
sound and a proper precedent to set with respect to the ambit
~ of the Committee's mandate, We also feel that it is consistent
ayy with the position which has been expressed by you. 4 A ese _
i) “fe”

&

fG' *
Enclosures - 2 yy Ieee “ANTON CONTAREED Dib ff ih 2

HER i plies! irate seh OL

62— ufo i & ‘f, 7 f . oy
Assoc. Dir. 116395 : ct of 7 a: . x he ‘
Dep. AD Adm." . ‘pe } ety _
Raw Inv. EWL:jv1 AN ' Y, v e.0 & 5 ft 7 ea
te in q Y . al ’ Ww?
oe Syst. Se ie ei ’ + ew bh
Est. Afairs _. aya gene , Hoy “lV YZ
rene Inv. _ NX ? 4 ay . ; ral
inspection — Ss WZ ve a)
Intoll. a we ;
Laboratory “\G 2 C } i
Plen. & Evel. Ate toa 2. -| ll 34 4
. Spec. Inv. aN A
Tretning — .
Tesh Ran aw? AL ‘ a 121 °

we GPO 954-546

Ray eae ‘did GEIB Pag a faPETYPE unit _]

ee!


!

legal Counsel Division
Me. J. C,. Farrington
Mr. W. R. Wannali

Mr, W. 0. Cregar

fet fel Bet fot
Paarl

May G, 1975
G2—LIGE85

UUITCD STATOS SENATE SELECT COMMETTES
7 STUDY GOVERNMENTAL GPERATIONG WET
REGPLCT TO TYTOLLIGERCE ACTIVITIES
LLINEC TE CONTAINED

, . ALE WS
RE: LGGAL aWTNORITIN exe USE
ate LOSOL By Aa

Reference 1s made toa Letter dated Harch 19, 1875,
toa the Attorney Generad from the Chairnan of captioned
Conmittes, whith onclosed certain requests for documonts
and other information fven the Federal Barcau of Investi«
gation {FBE}.

Under I,, Loral juthoritics, a general request was
jasaup tho =

made for memoranda discuss fecal authority of the For
to €1) invostigate internal sccurity matters, (2) collect
aw. intellicence infoxsmition, and (33 engage in countorintelli~
L- gence activities, Matorial responsive fo this request ws
ORY delivered to tha Gomnittes curang Aprai, 1078. afneluiled in

AtYy this miterind was a memorandum from the Director, FHI, to

es the Attorney General, dwted August 7, 1975, captioned "Scope
of TEBE Jurisdiction and Authority in Domestic Intelligence
Investigations.” This memorandum contained a iengthy and

| couprehensive discussion concerning the authority of the FRE
to gonduet investirntians in the general, internal security

ROR,

Since the recoipt of the above-nentioned material
the Committee has indicated a specific intorest in a position
\ pnper dated Jaly 21, 1972, diseussing the “Scope of FST
futhority, Juvisdietion and Hesponsibility in Donestic
Entelliconce investigations," This papery has been located
and subjected to intensive review, FL has been found that
the duly 34, 1072, position paper contains the interaal

Asse di. sO RHeYRtions which form the direct basis for the memorandum
Dep. ADAM to the Attornoy fioneral dated August 7, 20878. In view of
or wei — these circumstances and particularly beeause the July 31,

| Admin. i872, paper 1s considered to he an Internal deliberative
com, sts —— document, it is not considered appropriate that it should be |
Deke Wade ayailabie to tha Committce, f a) We B ; J
Gen, Inv. ed - iy RA / et
Iremection nn ° 1 ~ The Attorney General = aN ‘i ein fi, i yoe| w
intel. — 5
Leroy This document is prepared thi respohse to your request dnd is not for dissemt-
Plon, & Eval. — EWL:jvl AN nation outside your Committee, Its use is limited to official proceedings by
Spoe Inv — (7) a “your Comntittee and the content may not be disclosed to unauthorized persone

nel without the éxprés& approval of the FBI s

res oo eHOLOSUNE fii Bi Khebasee
4 . 00 ELETYPE UNIT L_] ERCL ’ tff ir y 16
IRAP HBSNE -DocidssoaB9588 Page 185 - /

Legal Coun.


June 2, 1975

MATERIAL FOR SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC)
\ INVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
M 1. TITLE/SUBJECT: Filing System
2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION: FBI

3. NATURE OF MATERIAL: Letterhead memorandum (LHM)
with enclosures described below

4, DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified
5. NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP: NA

6. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: SSC requested information con-
cerning the FBI's filing system and copies of printed forms
used by the FBI. the LHM served as a cover communication to
furnish to the SSC an undated nine-page memorandum entitled
"FBI Indexing Procedures.'' The SSC was also advised that there

vas available nine volumes of material containing detailed -

- instructions followed by FBI employees in classifying mail for- _
indexing; and that the nine volumes would be available for
review at FBI Headquarters by the SSC Staff. Also furnished
the SSC was one copy each of 13 Tables of Contents concerning
forms used by the FBI, The various types of forms in usei were.
explained in the LHM and the SSC was invited to choose those
forms it desired to see, after which steps would be taken to
make them available to the SSC Staff.

7. REQUESTOR/DATE OF REQUEST: SSC. 4/30/75. The response
is to Part IV of the SSC request.

ALL IE CK wre ONTAINED
8. RELEASING AUTHORITY: FBI HERE, Reser}
DATE asi: BY
Assoc. Dit. 9. DATE OF SUBMISSION: 5/22/75

Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep. AD Inv. —

so 10. LOCATION OF FILE COPY: FBI file 62-116395 LE be
isin, oe

Comp. Syst.
Est Ae 11. RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS: Wone.

Files & Com.

Won. SEP:ekw (4) Q'2 WJ + bie ho if
twat 62116395 Rib.to) At Ms Oy (pBbs

rien & HAOTE : Original via liaison to Central ieee: Tadéx in Yop

se. bv egnnection with Senstudy 75. 17 JUN 4 1975

Legal Coun.
Telephone Rm. —

te

jrector ws ses Pa TELETYPE UNIT (__] woes Reem GRO : 1975 0 - 569-920
da: 13 8 Page 186 .

—,

2 - Mr.S.F.Phillips


2- Mra A. Mintz
_ 4» rg (i@ger. 3. B. Wotiseties

- Mro W. R. Wannall
Mer. W. O. Cregar
- Mr. T. E. Burns

et
1

May 16, 1075

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECE COLILTEES
TO STUDY GOVERNODNTAL OPERATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO INPELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE: LEGAL AUTHORITY

Reference is made to ictter dated March 19, L975,
to the Attorney General from the Chatrman of the captioned
Committee, which enclosed certain requests for decumants and

eps) information from thea Federal Burean of Investigation
FBI}.

Enclosed is a copy of a memorandum from Glen T,
Pormarening, Assistant Attorney General for Administration
to Clarence Il, Helley, Dirattor FBI, dated November 1, 1974,

captioned "Federal Umployee Sccurity Program Executive order
10450."

The instructions contained in the enclosure wore the
subject of conversation between 1%. Raymond Vannall, Assistant
Director, and Ur, John DLLL£E of the Committec, Uay 5, 1975,
at Quantico, Virginia, aud are being furnished to the Comaittee
in order to provide further information with respeck to your
March 19, 1975, request.

62-116395

Assoc. Dir,
Dep. AD Adm. —

1 + The Attorney General . ALL etry aes ye
HERS SS NTAINE 4)
DATE oe gid By LAA)
TEB: cmc
* BY
(8) Ally
Dep. AD Inv. —
Asst. Dir.

‘
Admin.
Comp. Syst. _—
Ext. Affoirs ——
Files & Com. —

Gen. Inv.

Ident. ———_—__
Inspection —__
Intell.

Laboratory
Plan. & Eval, —

hs “4
Spec. Inv. _-—__ Pa ’ - — ~ ; \s
; “ Mii ~f L8
Training f. a, a / ; j
Legal Coun. —- of gio ~? y
Telephone Rm. — ' his? Tae .
Director Sec'y — MAIL ROOM[__] TELETYPE UNIT [_} GPO : 1975 0 - see-20

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 187


ba 17 Mr. W. R. Wannall
ow 1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar
. 1 - Mr. ©. E. Burns

woot, 274 . dc. A. Mintz -
- 1 - Mr. J. B., Hotis.: = on!

L The Attorney General Hay 16, 1975
) Director, FBI

a
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT .COMITTTEER
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

care NENA LN

0

By Letter dated March 19, 1975, the Senate Select
Committee requested ccertain information from the Federal
Bureau of Investigation {FBI). Part I of the Committee's
letter pertained to legal authority for investigations,

Enclosed for your approval and forwarding to the
Committee is the original of a memorandum and a copy of a
letter from Glen E, Pommerening, Assistant Attorney General
for Administration to the Director November 1, 1974,
captioned "Federal Employee Security Program Executive Order .
10450." 4

The instructions contained in the enclosed November 1,

1974, communication concern legal authority for investigations
and were the subject of discussion between ASS istant Director
W. Raymond Wannail and John ElLiff of the Seflate Select
Committee during a conference at Quantico, Virginia, May 5,
2975. The instructions are being furnished to the Committee
in an effort to provide more information with respect to the

y committee's letter of HNarch 19, 1975, referred to above,

A copy of this memorandum with enclosure is being
furnished for your records.

Enclosures {4) ULAR : oD Siete
A eras ee ier stale a KS oe!
- ne G60. ope
Assoc. Dir. 62-116395 Ot Aso" re, ape fe)
Dep. aD iw TEB: : 2 wr Oa a dh ate we
Asst. Dire: ome rons 'p re yt 5 have?
Admin. (3) uo \: \ . ! Dp
Comp, Syst, —— MM wf 4
Ext. Affairs —_ NOTE: @” . 5 f oa
co Mim bo [b/s ~/ G
Ident, —____ The enclosed Departmental letter contains certain

Inspection
Intell.

supplemental instructions furnished FBIHQ with regard to
Laboratory Executive Order 11785 amending Executive Order 10450. We
Pian. & Eval. —

Spec. Inv. - CR HE A
pee we NOTE CONTINUED PAGE 2

a7 JUN 4 4975

Training
Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. i

Director See'y —, MAIL ROOM ~ LETYPE UNIT [__] * GPO ; 1975 © - 569-920
Le ea erence ees

sod MkBoses Page 188


The Attorney General

MOTE CONTINUED:

are proposing the document be furnished to the Committee as

a supplement to material previously furnished the Committee
in line with their 3/19/75 request. John ELLiff of the
committoe evidenced interest in receiving such instructions
during a recent conversation with Assistant Director Wannall.
We are providing the instructions as a further delingation of
our authority in this area.

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 189 _

qi ee meemmeteen - .


x

‘ pederal Enployee Security Program

‘Criminal Division.

. an . .
Ly AL TORMNO, 10), % an X

6 A OTA FOITION . . . t .
Tea, Prete 624 ,CLF (Ot. E1.6 ita a t
Cat be Md bak ad . 7

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum . ..-.. °-

Qlarence M, Kelley | : DATE: NOV ty 1974
director | mr “ . . :
«e¢ Ipral Bureau of Investigation
‘sfon E. Pommerening

Assistant Attorney General
toe Administration

{
i
i
»
sepaae? < pree eencreenp ence

hag gen

Executive Order 10450

t

fern soe See!

This is in response to: your memoranda, entitled as above,
G@ated May 8, 1974 and August 19, 1974, directed to the Deputy
Attorney. General, Criminal Division,, And xeferring to pro-
blems which have arisen asa result o£ the promulgation of
Executive Order 11785 which amends Executive Order 10450, In
view of the involvement of my staff in -these matters, I will
undertake to answer your questions with the concurrence of the
i

‘As you know this matter has been under continuing review
“both in the Task Force, chaired by a representative. of this
office, of working level representatives of various agencies
in the security field and is now under study to a lesser degree
in Project #10 of the "Domestic Council on Privacy".

’" You ask that the Department; (a) provide specific instruc-
.tions to the Bureau to conduct intelligence-—type investigations
‘to identify and determine the activities of organizations now
Gescribed in the amended Section 8(a)(5) of Executive Order
10450; (b) furnish guidelines to be used by the Bureau in ini-
tiating investigations of individuals under the captioned matter
pursuant to Executive Order 10450 and specifically, criteria to
be utilized in determining whether available information is.a
sufficient basis for investigation. .

Under the amendment ' to Section 8(a) (5) of Executive Order
10450, we now have only two types of organizations; (1) those
Which unlawfully advocate. or practice the commission of acts
of force or violence to prevent others from exercising their
rights under the constitution or laws (of the United States or

wy

. . ae

6 Docid:32989588 Page 190


—

any State, (2) or which seek to overthrow the Government of
the United States, or any State or subdivision thereof, by -

unlawful means: (Emphasis added) . . 4

€

Of course, the key words which are underlined indicate
that the investigation should be initially based on a possible
violation of a federal (such as the Smith Act) or state statute
prohibiting unlawful advocacy or the commission of any unlawful
act of force or violence. However, in order for the Bureau to
detect organizations with @ potential of the above nature, it
is important that the investigation proceed on the basis of in-
formation indicating that the organization may be of the nature
mentioned. It is not necessary’ that a crime occur before the
investigation is initiated, but.only that a reasonable evaluation
of the available information suggests that the activities of the
organization may fall within the proscription of the Order. The
most recent example of the type of organization, ‘that you have
advised is becoming more prevalent, is the small but dedicated
to violence, Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA). Organizations. of

investigated as soon as information is available indicating their
potentiality for violence and of course, if possible, prior to
the fulfillment of their purposes.

It is true that Executive Order 11785 eliminated the prior
communist, totalitarian, fascist, and subversive characterizations
an@ definitions, but there was no intention of restricting the
investigations of such organizations if their programs call for
acts of force or violence or the unlawful advocacy of.the com-
-mission of acts of force or violence in furtherance of these
programs. . : ; -

.

.

It is not possible to set definite parameters covering the
initiation of investigations of potential organizations falling
within the Order but once-‘the investigation reaches a stage that
offers a basis for determining that the activities are legal in
nature, then the investigation should cease, but if the investi-
gation suggests a?determination that the organization is engaged
in illegal activities or potentially illegal activities it should
continue,

*‘ It follows in answer to-your second question that individ-
wals who are active either as members of or as affiliates of

. ’

2

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 191
a

‘gations déScribed above should be investigated when
Yymation is received indicating their involvement. The
# yardstick indicated above for organizations in deter-
ing whether the investigation should continue, should apply
cerning individuals and when a determination can reasonably
je made that the individuals activities, either within the
organization or as an individual, do not appear to be in vio-
lation of any law, then the investigation should cease.

eee ocean meee mere te ya

am,
.
a ‘ * oa
aft _ aoe
-
; -
,

” %
:
ny :
a
t
te -
a
3 .
-. e.
- > - e
t
oe, - -
- o id
: .
4 :
:
. .
°
5)
. ~
i 3

NW 86296 Docid:327989568 Page 1927 -

aoe!

nee
ans

. .
Cee or ceendeer

F
i
¢
i
:
t
4
#

4
|


—NMVR ER Dochd:3:

y “oy ew
7 ; , rc
ir at ae
ny ° Ab

i
7
|
t

£a~ IE.

ENELUSURE

OO, O

ef

_ NW 382796: Docld:32989588 Page 194

w

a 5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
_ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535
4 Addressee: SENATE SELECT COMMITTER
COLTR [KULHM (] Memo [_j Report dated 5f1 6./ 75

Caption of Document:nited States Senate Select
Committee to Study Governmental Operations
With Respect to Intelligence Activities
Re: Legal Authority federal Employee Sécurit ,

eR AX) XOCYU

Originating Office: ;

if

Delivered by:/
j aReceived by:

Title:

fle ZS IS AG, a

b Osu


¢ e _

La—- e3 75— Vs

CHANGED
be. ot NGED TO CK

HE! NIGUMCLASSIFIE

DATE Zoe or Sizes |
NOV 17 1976 |
Che Sy fy Ve D ;

__ NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 195

:
_ OPTIONAL fFOtm NO. 10 010106 . bd

aly 19462 EDIT ON “ : \

GSA GEN, REG. NO. 27 . . . ‘ . soc. Dire

UNITED STATES GC "“RNMENT - «SecA Ado

. os . “os Dep. AD Inv.
Memorandum | | waa

Comp, Syst. ——

. Ext. Affeirs __

vo  :.Mr. J. B. Adams pate: 5-23-78 "Bll & Com

Gen. fav. memree 2

Ident.

From : Legal Counsellors . hapetion _—-,

=m

j spagecr: ASSASSINATION OF JOHN FITZGERALD
KENNEDY.

DALLAS, TEXAS

11-22-63

O

SENATE.SELECT COMMITTEE ON
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES * |

On 5-22-75 CIA requested from the FBI copies of
photographs of three "bums" who were taken into custody by Dallas
authorities on 11-22-63 in the vicinity of the Texas School Book
Depository. It has been alleged that the three persons shown in the
photographs were E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis, individuals .
involved in the Watergate incident, and Thomas Arthur Vallee, who
was arrested in Chicago, Dlinois, several days before the Kennedy
assassination based on a threat against the President. Don Donahue,
Special Assistant to Senator Henry Jackson (D-Wash.),made available
on 9-12-74 to Inspector Bowers a set of the photographs depicting these
"bums" which had been furnished to Donahue by one Michael Canfield,
and the FBI Laboratory made copies from these prints, the original
being returned to Donahue, Donahue requested that his identity be ,
concealed as the source of these photographs. Canfield was supposed to

furnish a set of these photographs to Washington Field Office but it has
been determined he never did so.

At Mr, Adams' instructions, Bowers contacted Donahue
on 5-22-75 and advised him of the CIA request for a set of these photographs.
Donahue was told that if he has no objections we intend to furnish CIA a
set of the pictures with the statement that the originals were obtained from

an individual who requested his identity be concealed. Donahue stated that

was quite satisfactory to him, adding that if it becomes necessary he ,
agree to his identity being disclosed as the source of these pictur

Training —___!
Talaphons Rm, ._,

Director Pl ON

o/

gee year ne

~

sats MDMEQ £090 60

f, “2 f™ * :
1-Mr. Gebharate GH * ME STS 4 vt. Mintz BoM a
i-Mr. Wannall ' NOT RECORDED 1- Mr. Cregari —_
1- Mr. White 46 JUN 2 1975 1- Mr. Bowers
DWB:kjs (8) — COMBINUED - OVER wel L ee
jee ORIGINAL: ROCUMIENT § ENT TO ops .
NATION iL ({FKARCA) cat
DATE 94 Moben
LNW =88296 2Dech:32989588 Page 196 - _-


Legal Counsel to Mr. J. B. Adams
RE: ASSASSINATION OF JOHN FITZGERALD
KENNEDY
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON .
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Appropriate personnel of the General Investigative,
Intelligence, and Laboratory Divisions were telephonically advised
of the contact with Donahue late on 5-22-75 and the Intelligence Division
arranged that date to provide a set of the photographs to CIA.

RECOMMENDATION: |
For inforpiation. :

eum

po ee ey Pet gy ee ee ee . : tye ey
. eevee sath : a ae Boe et, : oe
2 ata ye anette namemeetennnt sh menmmetncmann tn = ‘ . slog oe bone ‘ eo : ara

MSNW 85296 Docihd:32989508 Page 187


‘
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505

Bey 1975

/ 2
MEMORANDUM FOR: - nentere of (the-USIB Ad Hoc
Coordinating Group

- SUBJECT ; : IC Staff Verification of
Clearances

Attached is an updated list of the security
clearances provided to the Senate Select Committee
Staff members. You will note there has been a
significant increase since our last listing.

Updated information will be provided to you as

this information changes.

Harriett D. Mowitt
Executive Secretary

* Attachment: a/s

* ERBERT DN ron Enis CONEARED

o a
chwe ys oa ; . NOT RECORDED

8 UL 24 1075

‘en
e:

OO oo ¢ Qeearals - procs. £e
“ . > . . _ oe .
84 ju2907 pAx ba New |

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 198

bat 396 ~

ashton.


>

I¢_ STAFF VERIFICATION OF CLEARANCES

. 21 MAY 1975
.Staff.Members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities who have :
received a security investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation within ,
the past five years and are certified as meeting requirements of EO 10450 for nn di
access to classified information up to and including TOP SECRET i
COMPARTMENTED | . mR
- a CLEARANCE DATE AND SOCIAL
NAME - DESIGNATED BRIEFED PLACE OF BIRTH SECURITY NO
‘Aaron, David * B 4/15 8-21-38 IL 550-44-7971 i.
Bader, William ‘ B 4/17 9-8-31 Nd ~~ 545-30-3377 ‘F-Badge oo
0 Bayly, John. * B 5/19 1-26-44 . DC, : $78-60-2305 ° e |
sBanoff, Barbara - no 1a20-45 : CAL). 561-68-9123
Baron, Frederick’. - A BB/D (12+2-47 “conn Soe or ys . my L
"| Benz, Charity I | Eee OO . 7-23-46 NY . 053-38-7410 : 7
z Birdsell, Wayne aa - Be2-06 DC s«éB 78-03-1842 ha
2 Brissett, Belva - ; : " 6-23-41 OK ' . -440-44~6374 :
“Brooks, Nancy aH : 2-14-40 KY - 313-38-6773, |
perown, Cc. Harold ai 6-6-38 Ohio. . 278-34-3428 ;
\ Carpenter, Margaret ie 5/19 © 8-27-44. CAL  —_-555+62-6129
wtarter, Barry * D5 B 4/24 «(12-14-42 caL =. 567-56~8854
\\Chesnik, Barbara ~ 4/18/46 WI -  390-46-2235 .
Davis, Lynn 8 B 4/17 9-6-43 . FL | 042~36-9155 TF-Badge -
Ny Dawson, Thomas : . - ; 9-9-52 MINN 471-60~-1688 . .
« Dawson, Rhett B5/19  12-9-43 ILL  351-34-4329 |

NW 65296 Docid:32999508 Page 199


COMPARTMENTED SO — oo ‘|

_ CLEARANCE _ DATE AND _._ SOCIAL on ae eee seis
NAME DESIGNATED BRIEFED PLACE OF BIRTH _ SECURITY NO - ; |
DeOreo, Mary 6-13-47 OH =». 28 7-42-6258
Dillon, Molly”. "4-16-51 VA 150-38-4588 rs
«Doolittle, Patricia 8-12-43 NC 213-42-6360
Dwyer, Daniel . an 8-24-52 MA ~ 023-44-8792 a ’
E1liff, John. 6 80H4L oC 345-34-2468 yo
Epstein, Michael Taylor - 7 . : . . 3-10-37 MASS 026-28-6318 , -
Erno, Joan — a 8-30-46: DC  - -215-46-2988 | a ;
. Fenn, Peter nn. a B4/24 | 12-12-47) MA : - 213-50-1123 ot :
Gitenstein, Mark Henry * mo 3-7-46 ALA 420-60-8767 —_ _ a,
_ Greissing, Edward a . 11-27-50 Germany 296-50-4113 | fs
Harrigan, Arthur 8 B5/19 3-16-44 NY. 141-34-1031 4
Hatry, Audrey Helen -* B 5/19 6-10-23 MD '216-14-8691.- mo, SC ae
_Inderfurth, Mark K.— * OB 4/29 9-29-46 we t 945-724-5617 TF-Radge — | f
Johnson, Dorothy sy 68-25 OR - 540-20-6413 | oe i
re > New : rs:
Johnson, Loch 7 a * . B 4/29 _ 2-21-42 Zealand 566~-62-0478 - i see +t

Karalekas, Anne 11-6-46 9 MA 023~36~4329
Kelley, Robert = * B5/19. 10-29-40 IND | 559-54-1348

|
NW 88296 Docid:327989568 Page 200 ‘ , :


|
l
l

#Monaco,

NAME

Kieves, Lawrence °

Kirbow, Charles

LaVoy, Diane

Liebengood, Howard

‘Lombard, Charles

Lynch, Mary

* MacDonald, -‘Naldeen
. Madigan, Michael James
| . Marshall, Benjamin

«Marshall, Burke

' "Mecham, Martha Evans

Miller, William G.

@Moore, Janet

O'Flaherty, James Daniel oO

Orloff, Jan

Patricia

COMPARTMENTED

_ Maxwell, Elliot Everett *

CLEARANCE
DESIGNATED BRIEFED
* B 5/19
* B 4/24.
* B 4/24
#2 SB A/IS
* B 4/17
B 4/15
x
4
x B 4/15
*
a
B 4/15

10-19-51 Brazil

DATE AND

PLACE OF BIRTH

1-4-48 NY
10-2-22 GA

11-10-48 Venezuela

12-29-42 IN
6-2-30

3-16-26 W. VA. -

| 4-18-43 .pc

5-4-19 NE

10-1-22 No
"7—-24-46 NY

2-11-40 CAL
8-15-31 NY

. 10-17-35 No

4-9-43
11-4-42 ILL
11-14~47 CAL

France

Iowa

SOCIAL

SECURITY NO

068-38-6464
252-12-5112
165-40~3119
307-44-9707
578-44~9471
250-38-1344
225-78-8708
042-34-3797
485-28-4503
57744-5241

-133+34-4225

528-48~-6848
109-26-4349

157-26-8100-

484-52-9820
239-62~-8495

558-74~8394 .. oe

Badge _

21 MAY 1975

SS eat
ee ge eee

TF - Badge

eee

Badge

TF - Badge _

!
one etntnt a  gond

TF = Badge

;
5
5
1

en x
= eet

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 201

NAME
Peterson, John F. .
Pitts, Susan
@ Pyle, Christopher
&Quanbeck, Elton
*Ricks, Walter
Romberg, Alan
Rowe, James

'Schneider, Ruth 1

Schwarz, Frederick
A.O., IIT

" Seidel, Lester
Shea, Patrick
Shelburn, Frank

‘smith, Elizabeth

*Smith, John L.

Smith, Stephanie
& Smothers, Curtis _-

Snider, Lewis Brittle

Talley, Martha -

x
HBA EAPTRBEBs Page 202

COMPARTMENTED
CLEARANCE

DESIGNATED BRIEFED

* B 5/19
“*#  B A/22

*. ° B5/19-
te 4
BB A/15

* B 4/15

* . B5/19..
* SB B/16

* B 4/24

DATE AND

“ PLACE. OF

6-15-41
10-24-53
11-24-39
5-15-26
12-27-46
12-1-38
6-6-51.
10-31-44.
4-20-35
7-17=44
2-28-48
5-30-13
6-21-49
3-3-39
3-23-54
8-26-43
1-12-45
9-7-50
6-2-10

BIRTH ~

CAT:
Canada
Mass
N.DAK
GA

NY

DC

CONN

DC
Utah ~
VA

NY

KY

OH :
MD

Nc

NC

IND

SOCIAL

SECURITY NO

565~56-7707
020-40-7638

019-30-9898

501-14-4534

244~74-4304 |

107~-30-8583

579-62-6719

008~32-0180

084-30-2047
21638-5204
52864-1965
338~24-6934
07642-0199 -
400-52~5800
282-58-6476
220-38-9869
246-72-0956
245~88-1368
313-12-1857

‘
[oeirey er

wate ne, eee
a’ *

Badge ~~


oe a _ a COMPARTMENTED Lo oo
; mo, CLEARANCE -  .° DATE AND: SOCIAL
NAME . _°. “DESIGNATED BRIEFED PLACE OF BIRTH | / SECURITY NO
Thomas, Robert. © . 12-16-25 MD ‘ | 219-114-5186
Towell, Mary = 4-25-44 TENN ; 566-64-7628
Treverton, Gregory 1-21-47 COLO.” . 524-62~-2459
Truehart, William 218-18 VA 225-20-6411
"Wallach, Paul OO 5 0. Be2a-47 NY 149-36-2999
Ward, Fred - le, Ss ae 11-20-40 peo *  225-50-9983 . :
Wides, Burton Victor |. * a B4/17) 6-14-41 NT = | 139-330-1936 TF - Badge ~ ,
wiik, Carol AnntL 0° PO dep insa wags 017-40-7170 oF
*Zimmerman, Phebe ce 12-1-50 | ohio * 271-54-1724 .
laocumentation is being forwarded. 7 a 7 ~ . oe ; re
; - @:
NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 203 — ee


9darr CONGRESS .
ist Srssion .
S

[Report No. 94-181]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

| re o ° May 21,1975 >

Mr. Grvreu submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on Rules and Administr ation

June 5, 1975
Reported by Mr. Caxxox, without amepeinteny)

oan Somali, - 79)
RESOLUTION —

Authorizing supplemental expenditures by tlee Select Committee

, To Study Govermnental Operations With Respect to Tntelli-

e. gence Agencies for an inquiry and investigation relating to

intelligence activities carried out by or on behalf of the
Federal Government.

1 Kesolved, That section 6 of Senate Resolution 21,
2 Ninety-fourth Congress, agreed to January 27, 1975, is
3 amended by striking out the amounts Ba, and _
. - Le.
4 “$100,000” and inserting in lieu thereof “$1,150,000” ayo RECORDED
‘ . 4975
5 $800,000”, respectively. 6 JUL 28 val
eeseccormes
| v ALL — Fe
{ INFORMATION 6: : s
\ HEREINyICH Bure A CONTAINED ‘
; DATE BY Lu
84 Wu 86 1975 5

LNW 88298 Dochd:32989588 Page 204 , 6 a

a,

rete’ DIRECTOR? OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE . ara
WASHINGTON, D. ©, 20505 } .

" USIB-D-27. 10/2
17 May 1975

° — a

MEMORANDUM FOR: USIB Principals Ne EME Ke Find y a

[ SUBJECT » Hfeporting of Interviews with WT vormressionat
: Investigating Committees or their Staffs _
REFERENCE : My Memorandum to Addressees, 10 April 1975,
Subject: Communi ty . Aspects of Inputs to
/Xongressi ofial Committees yf
Intelligence (USIB-D-27.10/1) Ah A

SS "e
Orginal Filed Ino - LIVS5~S507/

1. Reference memorandum reported establishment by tHe ;
Intelligence Community Staff of a registry for documentation g
relating to the Congressional investigations, and furnished
you with a format for abstracts to be provided to the registry
on each formal input to a Select Committee. In addition to Be
having in the registry the abstracts or, as appropriate, the
actual papers submitted as documentation to a Select Committee,
it is important that we establish a method for reporting on
interviews. Accordingly, I am enclosing a proposed format
for abstracts to be used for reporting on interviews by
Congressional Committee members or staff with your personnel
which involve information on Community activities or which, in

your judgment, raise the possibility of follow-on queries else- “.
where concerning the functioning or activities of the Community. ve
. a
2. There is no intent to intrude upon matters which are “

properly each agency's organizational responsibility nor to
infringe upon employees! individual rights or security. The
interview abstract format does not provide for identification
of the perso being, “intéryiewed. The "File Reference No."
entry “is FOF your convenience to indicate where any supporting
documentation is located within your own filing system.

ae Cam ALBIS -

NOT RECORDED

Seen aug 19 875 &

Se fg rcs _, SAAS

fle
Wd. BAG Broad 8 Page 205 ~

.  ] @s-v-z7. 10/2
1/ May 1975

3. It is essential that the Intelligence Community
be aware of all aspects of the Congressional investigations
which involve Community matters, or which may relate to Select
Congressional-Committee activities being conducted elsewhere
in the Community. The availability in the registry of document
and interview abstracts should help provide this internal

visibility.
. Oe on
LL
CL4 a ot Ka,

W. E. Colby
Chairman

Attachment: as stated

88296 Docld:32989588 Page 206


NW 88296 Dochd:32999508 Page 207

6 @

FORMAT FOR ABSTRACT TO BE SUBMITTED TO DCI/IC SELECT
COMMITTEES COORDINATING STAFF REGISTRY

ro

ORAL INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE SENATE
(HOUSE) SELECT COMMITTEE INVESTIGATING
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Subject:

Witness! Organization:

File Reference No.:

Date of Interview:

Interviewer(s):

Classification of Information:

Summary of Content: (Brief narrative statement describing
content, problems addressed, and any

conclusions or recommendation)

Relation to Intelligence Community Problems: (Identify)

Ca-//E BIE

ENCLOSURE

Attachment _
USIB-D-27. £0/2
17 May 1975

~
~

1
|
i
|
\
|

4975 DATE
1B tial po crasazonose8 Page 208

%

FROM

EPTIONAL FORM NG. 1G | ~ * $010-106  y
MAY 1962 ESITION )

GSA GEN. REG, NO, 27 ,
UNITED STATES Qeent : ry Assoc. Dar.
4 1 - My MAdams .

1 - Mr. MeDermott

f} “i ~ Mr. Flenister
S4tdy of SNA ~ Me. Schwartz

SUBJECT: MORTON uanpebnm—
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST Telephone 8

2
This memorandum sets forth results of sen ESE
contact with Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) concerning /

Haiperin's request to be provided with a. copy of a 1948
memorandum of understanding between the FBI and the CIA,
Halperin has made this request of both CIA and the Bureau.

On 4/30/75 Mr. James Garrison, CIA, advised that

.after considerabie research in CIA files, the following

documents (copies attached) were located which pertain
to Halperin's reguest. Copies have also been located in

Dep. AD Adm.
* Dep, AD Inv.

Memorandum 1 - Mr. Jenkins ° Asst, Dir

Admin.

Leboratory

C4 1 - Mr. Mintz Eee iar
: Mr. WLR. wannki ta, DATE: 5/7/75 Ape Pie fsen.
inh ON LMR URI SHELA Ca ADE oe 1 - Mr. Wannall Gof. dnv
oo 1- Mr. J.C, Farrington  [--
> ALC. Plenistéi,J0. pl - Mr. Cregar tatell.

Pilon. & Eval. _

Spec. Inv.

Training

(Sects Rm.

oy

Bufiles: ~.

(1) Memorandum for the Record dated 9/22/48
entitled "“Cocperation and Liaison Between Federal
Bureau of Investigation and Office of Policy
Coordination, CIA," which was prepared by CIA
and originally classified Top Secret, This:
document has recently been downgraded by CIA to.

a classification of Secret. ;

(2} Letter dated 9/22/48 from Frank G.

“Wisner, Assistant Director for Policy Coordination,

CIA, to Mr. D. Milton Ladd, Assistant to the
Director, FBI, which forwarded as an enc tones
the 9/22/48 memorandum described above This

item was also originally ified ! mee Ly ole
but has been downgraded fyi tof ely pan BGS Say :

cee eS
(3) Letter dated 10/2/48 from NOE RECORDED cy

to Wisner which acknowledges that the @ Paap nt
set forth in the memorandum of 9/22/48 is’ sat!
factory to the Bureau. This item weeesot clag
fied in accordance with current classification
standards but bears the marking “Personal and
Confidential."

Enclosures ~ 3 j ; CONTINUED - OVER
LES:tdp (10) , / rf

y a O87 1629S, INFOR
HERS At

4

if SSF]
BY

oe

uf ot q nei yep ose am
¢ we oo wrk
ABS ie adie HO ble

(Yer
TION CONTAINS. x

Yep

fia

636 Jb Q

AL, rus wt

an


Memorandum to. Mr. W.R. Wannall
RE: MORTON HALPERIN
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST

Mr. Garrison advised that CIA considers items 1
c . and 2 to be CIA documents and item 3 to be an FBI document
contining CYA information. CIA proposes to. funnaish Halperin
declassified copies of items.1and.2.which have been sani-
truea-ii Accordance with the brackets on the attached copies.
CIA has no objection to the Bureau's furnishing Halperin

AAT

a copy of item 3 if it is declassified and the CIA informa-
tion indicated by brackets ir’ tne wt tached copy is excised.
Mr. Garrison noted that CIA no longer considers the 9/22/48
memorandum to be operative since CIA's Office of Policy

Coordination no longer exists.

Mc. Garrison advised further that with regard
to a Senate Select Committee (SSC) request forcspies of all.
agreements between the FBI and the CIA, CiA.does not plan .
| to provide the SSC with copies of items 1 and 2 but plans.
| to allow appropriately cleared SSC staff representatives
| to examine the unsanitized Secret versions of items 1 and
| 2 at CIA Headquarters. He further advised that CIA would
| have no objection if the Bureau allows SSC staff representa~
| tives to examine item 3 in Bureau space provided it is
classified Secret-in accordance with CIA's classification
of its information. Mr. Garrison requested that if the
Bureau decides to provide the SSC with a copy of iltem'3 °
for its retention, the document be declassifidd and sanitized
in accordance with the attached copy. c —

The Intelligence Division has no objection to the

FOIA request of Halverin being handled in accordance with

the above. Recommendation for handling of the SSC reduest .

will be made by separate memorandum. |
CI

ACTION:

This memorandum and its attachments should be

forwarded to the FOTIA Unit of the Files and Communications

Division for appropriate handling.

4 Van “fe B,
OO woll pee

NW 58296 Docid:32989568 Page 209

22 September 1948

“N

_ MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD:

'. , SUBJECE: Cooperation and Liaison Between Federal Bureau of
; Investigation and Office of Policy Coordination, CIA

ae

1. This memorandum records an understanding which has been. .
arrived at in conversations between Mr. D. Milton Ladd, Assistant Oo oa
:: to the Diroctor, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Mr. Frenk Ga
Wisner, Assistant Director, and Chief of the Office of Policy
.»; Coordination, of CIA. The conversations in question were duly
authorized by the Associate Director of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and by the Director and Deputy Director of CIA and
were arranged by the Executive Secretary of the National Security -
Council on behalf of the White House. The purpose of the under~
_ standing is to provide a basis for cooperation end liaison between
_ ° the FBI and the Office of Policy Coordination, CIA, and the following
ee points. summarize the essential elements of the understanding:

. “ae In view of the distinctive character of the activi-
‘ties of the Office of Policy Coordination, it is considered
‘..,. advisable that separate and direct liaison be established
=. between that office and the FBI. For this purpose the FBI
"will provide a special liaison officer who will be nominated
_ +. by the FBI within the near future. (This arrangement has
“:; been specifically approved ‘by tha Deputy Director, CIA, in
the. absence of the Director, ) oe ‘
%
be oc is understood that in the ‘discharge of the duties
“and obligations laid upon the Office of Policy Coorination by
. the National Security Council, it is necessary for this
Office to have dealings with individuals and groups of foreign
| nationalities, within and without the United States and to -
sponsor the movement from time to time of such individuals
and representatives of such groups between the United States
and foreign countries. The Office of Policy Coordination
' resoenizes the primary responsibility of the FBI in the field
of United States domestic security, and the FBI acknowledges ,
; thet it is essential for the Office of Policy Coordination |
" to have direct dealings with the individuals and. “GROUPS: afore |
montiorede ne, :

<ae

@o In order that the interests of both parties to this”
understanding shell be served, it is understood that the

- Office of Pelicy Coordination keep ths FBI generally ‘informed
concerning the extent enl character of ite dealings with

io eae | eh Mo BOS fu

voy

pyre
ted

fr
tv

Mex

abead

“y

EM me ot

* NwW 88296 (nk sons oe 210! & “Ss SECRET | GORY OF _2 AS ;


It - Groups and Organizations:
__. International ‘Peasant Union which is made up of

". representatives of Polish Agrarian Party; Bulgarian
» Agrarian Party; Croatian Peasant Party; Hungarian
Small Holders Party; Rumanian National Peasant Party;
Serbian Agrarian Union and a number of recognized

. :Gzethoslovak political leaders..

aa

“In view of the highly classified character of our activities, .
-I am sure that you will appreciate the importance of maintaining the 7
maximum seourdty precautions. .

Sincerely yours,

. FRANK G. WISNER
Assistant Director for

tee


Metre eh ait ered enter eemerlor

ea nant Nk a A ne a eee |
>

22 Soptenber 1948

.

_Hre De Milton Ladd ;

Assistant to the Director , . .-
’ Federal Bureau of Investigation

. Washington 25, De Co.

- Dear Mr. tadd: ae . Co ;

. " Gonfirriing our telephone conversation of today, I am enclosing
., Wea draft of a proposed memorandum which I have prepared for the
_ | purpose of recording the understanding which has been arrived at
ae , between us in regard to the cooperation and liaison between my
‘office end the Bureau. I have endeavored in this draft to set ows
the essential features of our conversation of yesterday afternoon
_ ead I should appreciate your indicating to me any modifications
or changes which you may deem necessary or advisable to reflect
"your recollection and understanding of our conversation. Upon
ny receipt of your suggested changes, if any, and following any
further discussion between ua which may be indicated as desirable,
I shall prepare this memorandum in final form and furnish to you
the original end a copy thereof, with the request. that you. initial
and re turn to me the COPY o ; .

: In. accordance with the terms of our under standing, I should .

; like to submit to you herewith the names of certain of the individuals
-end groups with whom it is proposed that my office will havo dealings
- in comnection with our authorized activities. From time to time in
ithe future I shall furnish you % with additional names. The following
Tare the names: A . wo?

7- Individuals:

George Me Dimitrov, Exiled S-sretary General of
eet _ Bulgarian Agrarian Party

res

ha

Stefan Osusky, prominent Czech Refugee leader : 7
* - “ ie

Chaar gr ih |

Ferenc Nagy; head cf Hungarian Small Holders Party

4

Dre Vl adico Macek, representative of Croatian | .
Peasant Party NA

fe,

Aoh consen

dor

orf

ve

' Stanislas Mikelajczyk, former Polish Vice Premier

4

Smeg pte) J FP

Downgraded to SECPET per Ls
CEC RET \ .

Andro Cretzianu, vormer Rumsnian Cabinet Minister’ : -

Paul J. Burns, 49210 Pes «
WE BB296 32989588 Page 212 ee. ag ek

Water


- foreign individuals and groups within the United States.
More specifically the Office cf_Policy Coordination wili,
in so far as possible, inform the FBI sufficiently in
‘advance of its proposed dealings with such individuals |
and groups to enable the FBI to advise the Office of |
Policy Coordination of any security risks which may be
‘involved in dealing with such individuals and groups

‘and “in order to provide the FBI with adequate opportunity
‘: 60 indicate individuals which it is employing for its own
.purposes in connection with the penet tration of foreign
“Groups. oo. .

wen thee ‘There shail be an exchange of information between
.. . the FBI and the Office of Policy Coordination concerning
' the significance, activities, and reliability of such
“individuals and groups of foreign nationalities within the
.. United States as may be of interest to the Office of Policy
- Coordination.

NW 88296 Docld: 32989588 Page 213 ; . '


4 é EYES ALONE 4

Ya THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

WASHINGTON, D. C, 20505

f ; 30 MAY 1975
Intelligence Community Staff O oo __ DCT/1C-75-0597

a Aly ~75”

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Thomas—K._Latimer, Department of Defense
; Mr. William G. Hyland, Department of State
Mr. E. H. Knoche, Central Intelligence Agency
Mr. William O. Cregar, Federal Bureau of
Investigation
Mr. William N. Morell, Jr., Department of Treasury
Mr. James G. Poor, Energy Research & Development
Administration
Mr. William Nichols, Office of Management and a
Budget
Mr. John B. Hotis, Department of Justice a
SL.
SUBJECT : Future Legislation Relative.to U.S. Intelligence;

Following up on the discussion at yesterday's meeting
of the Policy Steering Group, addressees are encouraged to provide
‘ to the White House specific suggestions for administrative or

legislative action relative to U.S. intelligence programs. Such

proposals should be realistic and doable in the near term. Please
provide two copies of all suggestions to James Wilderotter, Room
182, Old Executive Office Building by 10 June 1975.

fi jReo-100 625 L
shane ya) “et BLE? HO

Harriett D. Mowitt
Executive Secretary
USIB Ad Hoc Coordinatinge&srouwss ===}

17 JUN A> 1975

84 JUN4 1975

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 214 EVES ALONE


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 . $010-106
MAY 1962 EDITION
- “a oy REG. NO. 27

-~ “UWITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum :
Comp."Syst. ——

TO : Mr. J. B. Adams pate; 0719-75 Flee & Con

Gon. Inv.
ew Ident.
ie ees

FROM : Legal Counsel”,

7 rtaniienr aren a "ALL INFORMATION con ee } c abor ator
[a ‘arn mo HEREIN 8 Lpol ASSIF S ae
supject: SENSTUDY 75 ; DATE B Spec. Inv.

Training

Assoc. Dir.

Inspection —__.
Intell.

Telephone Rm. —

K. William O'Conner, Deputy Assistant Attorney Director Sec'y —
General, Civil Rights Division, who has recently been designated by ,
the Attorney General to coordinate all responses by the Department
to the Senate Select Committee(SSC), advised on the afternfon of 5-19-75
that he had met with Chief Counsel to the SSC F. A. O. Schwarz and John
Elliff, who is the head of the task force of the Senate Select Committee
on the FBI. O'Conner stated he informed Schwarz and Elliff that he would
not make available Bureau secretaries Mary Ann Massa and M. Ann
Mierzejewski, who aré séhéduled for interview on Tuésday, 5-20-75,
absent an agreement by the Committee that an FBI representative would
be allowed to be present during the interview. O'Conner indicated that
the Department's stand in this matter regarding the insistence that FBI
representatives be present during the interview was backed by the White
House, the Attorney General, and the Deputy Attorney General.

By way of background, it should be noted that Mr. O'Conner »
and Associate Deputy Attorney General McDermott were contacted on g
5-14-75, and advised of the requested interview of the two aforementioned!“
employees at which time O'Conner and McDermott did not advise of any
way in which the employees could be prevented from consenting to interview.
While they were upset at the prospect of service personnel, such as steno-
graphers being interviewed by the Committee, they indicated at that time
they could not see any legal leverage which could be used to preclude

‘ such interviews. With this decision in mind arrangements were made

: 6a -116395~ J eS
O'Conner he would have to check with the

SSC prior to agreeing to allow FBI representatives to be present. O'Conner
stated Schwarz was quite upset at the Department's stance in this matter,
but indicated he would give O'Conner an answer-this everiing? O'Conner
indicated to Schwarz that the two Bureau employees would be available for =
interview on the 20th should the Committee agr&e fo thé presence of FBI a
representatives during the interview. em

]

ree ES

—

1 -Mr. Adams 1-Mr. W. O. Cregar | kee
1 - Mr. Hotis / ds
Fe

¥

1-Mr. Daly £
.CONTINUED ~ OVER ; jj

SEE ADDENDUM - PAGE 2 ’


we od a

Legal Counsel to Adams Memo
Re: SENSTUDY 75

‘O'Conner requested that the Bureau contimie with
his plan to have both employees available should the interview take
place on the 20th.

. ACTION:

You will be kept expeditiously advised of all developments
concerning this matter.

“0
¢" Wi

ADDENDUM: . LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION 5-19-75 - PVD:dkg
EE EE EEE ORE

At 4:15 p.m. Mr. O'Conner advised that he had just been
contacted by F..A. O.: Schwarz, and Schwarz stated the Committee's
position concerning the-presence of FBI representatives during the interview
of the two secretaries is unchanged. O'Conner related that he told Schwarz
that Departmental position is also unchanged in that there will be no
interview unless the Committee relents on this position. - O'Conner indicated
he would keep the Bureau advised and requested that we continue with our
plans to have the secretaries available for interview as Schwarz indicated
he would again contact O'Conner regarding this issue.

yt) | | Mew
aN \ 7

NW 68296 Docid:32989586 Page 216

é es

Airtel 1 - Me. W. R. Wannall
1 - Mr. W, O. Cregar
5/23/75
To: °*. SAC, Atlanta 1 - M. S. F. Phillips
From: Director, FBI (62-116395)
a) PERSONAL ATTENTION
SENSTUDY 75
f°
ia Enclosed for immediate hand delivery to former
_—

SA Alan G. Sentinella is an original and one copy of a state-
ment he voluntarily dictated to a Bureau secretary 5/21/75

and which was transcribed subsequent to Sentinella's departure
from Washington, D. C.

i
For your information, Sentinella has indicated a , {
desire to review this statement and make any necessary
corrections, after which he will furnish you a copy for
forvarding to the Bureau which should be by cover airtel .
immediately after Sentinella makes it available. Direct |
airtel to Attention, INTD - W. 0. Cregar. ;
Enclosure

SFP: sehen et!)

(6)

NOTE: The statement involved concerns Sentinella's
testimony before an Executive Session of the Senate Select
Committee 5/21/75, contents of which testimony Sentinella
indicated’ to S. F. Phillips of the Senstudy 75 Project ‘he
(Sentinella desired to make available to the Bureau.

fib INFORMA TI
Low HER Sips ete wales fA ) Ib Yy
ae h DATE £7

er

a a” e09/ pot He wer 4

Dep. AD Adm. _,

Dep. AD Inv.
Asst, Dir:
Admin.
Comp. Syst, __.
Ext. Affairs __.
Files & Com. __.
Gen, Inv.
Ident.

a ees (1

Bs Mae’ai975 a

Inspection
Intell.

Laboratory
Plon. & Eval.
Spec. Inv.

Training —___.
Legal Coun.
Telephone Rm.
Director Sec'y «ss MATL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT [(__}

NW 68296 Docld:32989588 Page 217


é ¥ OPTIONAL FORM NO.y 10 5010-106 e «(OA
MAY 1952 ECITION : .
GSA GEN. REG, NO, 27

é UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Mee Ane
Dep. AD Inv. __
Memorandum 1 - Mr. J. B. Adams Aas. Di
| 1 - Mr. T. J. Jenkins Co
~ ere Ext. Affairs —_
A : Mr. W. R. Wannall DATE: 5/23/75 Files & Com.
eee an Tn Gen. Inv.
ai
f

y. Ident,
[et 1 - Bach Assistant Director Inspection
FROM : W. OW Intell. kd! y
Labora’

a 1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar Ei
SUBJECT: 0 - 75 Spoe. Wdv.
. Trainin
Orne aco tS Tolophone Rm.
¢ Director Sec’y
Jest A) vk
Reference is made to my memorandum dated 5/19/75 Hot)
which attached a copy of a letter to the Attorney General
dated 5/14/75, from Senator Frank Church, Chairman,
United States Senate Select Committee (SSC) with appendices
A thru D. The memorandum noted the ambiguous nature of some
of the SSC requests and that Mr. K. William O'Conner, Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, who is the Department of Justice
coordinator for SSC matters, is presently negotiating the 5/14/75
requests with the SSC Staff.

Even though the negotiations are still under way, we i
believe that ultimately we will be required to provide substantia
responses to the 5/14/75 requests. To this end we have begun
to gather together the necessary data from our “files in anticipa-
tion of the substantial responses we will be required to prepare.
The various requests set forth in the May 14, letter have been
analyzed and specific assignments made to prepare responses. The
primary assignments have been made to representatives of several
Sections of the INTD. It is anticipated that in some circumstances
it will be necessary for these INTD representatives to convey
requests for information and material to other Divisions. When
such action is necessary contact will be effected through the

fee
s designated representatives of the other Headquarters Divisions.
“? A list of such other Divisional representatives is maintained
es by the SENSTUDY Staff on the basis of designations made to assist
cag in previous SSC requests, and is set forth below.
[ ane} Go.
tice DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE EXTENSTON
=e
toe 1-Identification James T. Stewart 4219
may ind REGLOF UGE A [GD
Re: 2-Training James E. "Re: LLY) l= 494) aad
3-Administrative Fred Woodworth 4132 :

62-116395 wy @ 4973
EWL/SFP: cmc a eed a YUN 8 191 Ss)
(17) CONTINUED,.2wOVER™ poe
ALL INFOFS SATION CONTAINED . .
HERE! OLASSIFIG ity, \f

DATE ¢ BY

| Gballl Baa see Page 218


Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall
Re: SENSTUDY - 75

62-116395

4-Files and Communications Homer R. Hauer 4870

6-General Investigative J. William Hines 7 4276
7-Laboratory John P. Wilgus Had SY OF
8-External Affairs David L. Divan 2535

9-Special Investigative John E. McHale 2525
10-Inspection Fred Griffith 2830

li-Legal Paul V. Daly 3542 .
12-Computer Systems Charles D. Neudorfer 3635

The listed individuals are considered to be the
permanent representatives to the SENSTUDY project and will be
the primary points of contact within the respective Divisions.
It is requested that any Division desiring to change the above
designations promptly advise SENSTUDY project on extension 4636.

ACTION:

None except where necessary to redesignate Division
representatives.

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 219


$010-106

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 "

MAY 1962 EDITION @

GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Assos, Dir
Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep. AD Inv. —

Asst. Dir.:
Admin,
Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com, —
Gen. Inv.
Ident.

Memorandum

: Mr. J. B. Adams

}
\

FROM

i ctto:
Nbtsft
ab MAtory
Plon. & Eval. —

: Legal Counse A —

a a
SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75 5
| rentinttcene yeyeuren swe

vee
fa rae
On 5/21/75, Andy Smith, Supervisor in our Didhetor Soc'y

Birmingham Office, called Deputy Assistant Director Herington
and advised that former SA Robert R. Nichols (HOD: 1/6/47;
retired:.5/12/72) had been contacted by the Senate Select Committee
for interview. Smith comected Nichols through to Herington, at which
time Nichols advised that about ten days ago Lester Seidel of the Senat
Select Committee had contacted him, At that time, Ni¢hols was going
to Oklahoma City, and has just recently returned home to Birmingham. ,

Nichols stated that at one time he was the case agent in the Atlanta .
Office on the Martin Luther King investigation, and it was presumed
this was the subject matter of the proposed interview. —~ q

Nichols was advised that the decision as to whether he
would consent to interview was entirely his to make. He was reminded
that he had signed a secrecy agreement, and was reminded of the provisions
of AG Order 501-73 requiring prior authority from the appropriate Depart-
mental official prior to a current or former employee furnishing information
he acquired during the course of his employment. He was also advised
that he had a right to be represented by a personal attorney if he desired
and that he had all the constitutional rights available to him, Fe same as
any citizen. He was further told that if he desired to have -_ —~_ bg
representative available, but not present during t ifaserial Gilg
so request, noting that the purpose of the FBI repre bie
counsel him concerning sensitive areas which, ,might be explored.
yor Ss JUN 3 1975
It was emphasized to Nichols that the FBI w uld not and
could not recommend the course of action he should take Snd*that the =""“"
decision with regard to this interview was entirely his to make,
)

ehol

Ne
an coals

7 GALL INFORNY

PERSONNEL RECORDS UNIT

COPY RETAINED IN

RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

1 - Mr. Adams
1 - Mr. Wannall

WEREIY!
DATE

1 - Mr,
1 - Mr,
1 - Mr,
1 - Mr.

JH-yatm-
Gdallll! BGasz

Phillips )
Mintz, C, A en vi
Hotis

Herington

& Page 220

Mr. David E. Todd
20 Cozzolino Drive

Millbrae, CA 94030 vs |
2 ig MAY
! loro

[c= eee’

’

| Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
9th and Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20535

Attention:.
* office of the Legal Counsel

| NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 221

4A JUN 4975. “Y

NW 88296 Docid:32989588° Page 272

Attention:

gack

Angton .
offic the Legal counsel

Remytelcall 5/16/75

pavid EB. Todd

7 D |
ie .
\ Stent ty - vA y aw)

i .
= Se
panes]
Pa .
£5
eo \-
ae ox %
=o
re exch sone 5 ed
ae ENCED?” ALL INFORI i
~B | ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED bv 16375
Si DATE LOOOL By
> P

NG al wis a7 MAY 211
G3 Mae

, (ye: &

9

75
sree

ape

exit LEG.


| May 19, 1975
20 Cozgzolince Drive
Millbrae, CA 940306

My. Lester B. Seidel
Investigator
Select Committee to Study
Government Operations with
Respect to Intelligence Activitias
Room 2308 Ct pes ee “HOS:

Building 302 - Dirkson Building ne ued ,
PDA ple)

Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Seidel:

Reference is made to your telephone call to me on May 16,
1975, in which you advised that the Committee was gathering
facts concerniny the FBI's various CoIntelPros and in
particular, you were looking into the CoIntelPro having

to do with the Black Panthers. You inguired if I recalled a
Letter, which had been made public, dated May 11, 1970, from
the Director, FBI, to the SAC, San Francisco, which suggested
disruptive techniques against the Black Panthers and which
mentioned spurious police or FBI reports. I advised you I
had no first hand recollection of having seen such a document
at that time, but that I had read a recent news item describ-
ing such a document.

You also indicated an interest in the theoretical question as
to whethoar intelligence functions should be divorced from
enforcoment functions in order to avoid the dilemma of dis-
closure versus dismissal, and you suggested that my views on
this might be helpful in educating the Committee.

For your information, I entered on duty as a Special Agent on
January 5, 1942, and retired from the Bureau on December 3,
1971. During the two years immediately preceding my retirement
<i served as supervisor of a squad of agenta which investigated,
among other matters, violations and alleged violations of law
by the Black Panthers. The only information I have concerning
the Black Panthers was learned as a direct result of my official
duties. I have made no independent study of them, nor do I
have any personal files or written material, either official

or otherwise, relating to then.

Since speaking with you, I have reviewed Executive Order $501-73
(28 C.F.R.S§ 16.21, 16.22 and 16.23) which specifies that no
employee or former employee of the Department of Justice shall
produce any material contained in the files of the Dapartment

bse 00296 1d:32989588_P:


| Docld:32989588 Page 224 =

May 19, 1975
Page -2~

nor shall he disclose any information acquired in the performance
of his official duties without prior approval of the Attorney
General or appropriate Departmental official.

From this, I must conclude that I am prohibited from furnishing
you or the Committee any information along the lines requested
by you unless appropriate authority to do so has first been
given by an authorized representative of the Department of
Justice.

Very truly yours,

 WJryped CXL Pot
DAVID E. TODD

ces Director,
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Sth and Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20535

Sac

Federal Bureau of Investigation
450 Golden Gate Avenue

Sam Prancisco, CA 94102

ee


ia oe
OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 5010-106 iy |

Se ® ®@. ee |
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT pS tse, of)
’ ; ‘és aby ie /

“Memorandum Regio

» Syst. \
Ext. Affairs

TO : Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 3/20/75

Files & Com. |
Gen, Inv, |
- vy Ident.
4 ay 4 tw agtipn :
FROM : Legal Counsel J ie 1 a Bt.
Plon. & Evel
Spec. Inv,
SUBJECT:. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ALLINFOD. Fe en AED ane ;
“Oo LIGENCE ACTIVITIES oe tye reine Nome Rn
cen ae iy

I received by hand delivery from the Department at 3:06 pin
on March 20, 1975, the attached copy of a letter from Senator Church -+ A
to the Attorney General dated March 19, 1975, with its enclosed list of /A@K/8!
requests being made by the Committee. ; nie
Senator Church requests that the documents involved be 5 JERS
supplied to the committee at the earliest oppoftunity. A review of the
requests revealed that the Intelligence Division would have the principal
interest in all except request Il, A and C, which would be of interest 0
to the Administrative Division. The last item appearing under V, B ~~
shuld be available only through the Criminal Division of the Department"
or the Attorney General's office.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That the Intelligence Division and the Administrative

“Division review the attached request for FBI materials to Aen
whether we may make a full response to the Ms ESE ALS / b¢ Qi

a, co
aie 8 7 APR 22 1975

2. That the required materials be HR 22 1 cnn :
to the Committee and any difficulties be made known at the earliest possible

ace.

62-116395
f

Enc. a Ven

1 - Mr he fy"

. Wannall - Enc. we
1 - Mr. Walsh - Enc. | A he
1 - Mr. Farrington - Enc. a i“ Ys
1 - Mr. Hotis - Enc. . aay,
1 ~- Mr. Mintz - Enc. phere La L
enh bt a
JAM:mfd \
(7) ni |
}
84 JUN3 1975

NW 88296 Dochd:32989588 Page 225

> v ~~ f ae
— .
™ FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMAN , ‘
JON 6. TAWER, TEXAS, ViNk CHAIRMAN 5
AILIP A. HART, ficH, 7 HOW ROH. BAKEN JR. TENN, FE %

WALTER FL MONDALE, MIMS DAPRy GOLOWATER, AR'Z,
Muriled Diates Denale

YALT<? D. a LULESTION, KY. CHARLES MCG, MATHIAS, UR; MD.
SELECT COMMITTEE TO

(OBEL-T MORGAN, N.C, RICKARD S. SCHWEINER, PA.
VARY HART, COLO, .

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH
é RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

WILLIAM G, MILLER, STAFF DIRECTGR
(PURSUANT To S. RES. 21, 4TH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C, 20510

March 19, 1975

The Honorable Edward H. Levi
The Attorney General
Washington, D. C. 20530

Dear Me. Attorney General:

On behalf of the Senate Select Committee To Study Governmental
Operations With Respect To Intelligence Activities, Senator Tower and
I want to thank vou for the opportunity we had on February 26, 1975,
to discuss the work of the Committee. I want to express my personal
appreciation for your willingness to assist the Committee to meet its
responsibilities under the mandate of 5S. Res. 21. I believe we are in

ley

agreement that the work of the Committee should proceed as expeditiously
as possible. .

Toward that end we are seeking initial documentation from various
agencies whose activities fall within the mandate given us by the Senate.
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of an initial request for documents

{ relating to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which has been previously
discussed with staff representatives of the Bureau. With the unanimous

| aoproval of the Committee, I respectfully request that the documents be
supplied to the Committee at the earliest opportunity.

We expect to make similar initial requests for documents to other
parts of your Department that fall under the mandate of S. Res. 21.

T truss that our respective staffs will continue to work together
in the spirit of mutual cooperation which we both recognize is necessary
to ensure a thorough and expeditious investigation.

Parana

With kind regards, r-

; Sincerely , “ J
AL SNFORMATION CONTAINED | ~ C4 ;

Y

Let

Docid:327989588 Page 226

HEREIN 122 po pASslr, ;
DA IS OL BY

a
{ / ely va
Frank Church
Chairman

2, hoe 39s -1b0
e ENCLOSE]


. .
« aT
a * ‘
a me f @ @ ‘
w i e o
‘ . »-

a

FIRST REQUEST FOR FBI DOCUMENTS

I. Legal Authorities

All memoranda discussing the legal authority of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation to (1) investigate internal
security matters, (2} collect intelligence information, and B
(3) engage in counter-intelligence activities; together |
with copies of all constitutional and statutory provisions
executive orders, presidential directives, Attorney General
Opinions and memoranda, and-any other materials asserted as
sources of such authority.

TI. Jurisdictional Agreements

All delimitations agreements, jurisdictional agreements,
agreements for coordination, and memoranda or understanding, F
between the FBI and any other Federal departments or agencies,
insofar as they pertain to internal security, intelligence _w.
collection, and/or counter-intelligence matters, operations,
or activities.

TIf. Organization

A. A detailed current organizational chart reflecting 4
- all divisions, sections, branches, and units of the FBI, and
the subject matters assigned to each by generic and numerical ~~
designation. '

B. <A list of names, titles, and offices of assignment of
all Intelligence Division persénnel at FBI Headquarters, down bh
to and including unit chiefs, together with the number of wnt
personnel below the level of unit chief catepyorized by unit
or other office of assignment.

C. <At the £ield level, the titles and the number of FBI
field office agents assigned to internal security, intelligence
collection, and/or counter-intelligence matters, operations, or 3
activities, together with the percentage of total agent man-
hours devoted to such matters, operations, and activities.

ALL INFO: a
MERE}: Ie MATION ” CONTAINED
ATE Hippy SIFT

BY

_ NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 227

q

au” a : ~
FIRST REQUEST FO@MERI DOCUMENTS 9

NW 88296 Dochd:32989568 Page 225

we
Rage two

we

IV. Policies and Procedures

A. The table of contents of the FBI Manual of Instruc-
tions, and those portions of the Manual of Instructions ea
which pertain to internal security, intelligence collection,
and/or counter-intelligence matters, operations, or
activities.

B. The table of contents of the FBI Manual of Rules
and Regulations, and those portions of the Manual of Rules
and Regulations which pertain to internal security, intell-
igence collection, and/or counter-intelligence matters,
operations, or activities.

\

V. Studies and Reports

A. The Special Report of the Interagency Committee on

Intelligence (Ad Hoc), dated June, 1970.
————-

_—

2
B. The original report on COINTELPRO activities pre- (- a.
pared by the Committee headed by Assistant Attorney Generay ,

|
Henry Petersen. —_

Pe

UNITED STATES oWexnteret q@ i Bena a
* te
~~ Memorandum { pon
) ( com
ta Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 5-15-75 Gan Ie
* Ident.
oS Inspection
FROM Legal counsti fin — _ Intell.
atory
a) ‘ewer pee olf — a
- ine we. va
suBjecT:. SENSTUDY 75 } te Inve
oe a : rns 5
The purpose of this memorandum is to advise that Divector Soc"y
the Department has named Deputy Assistant Attorney General K. William
Connor of the Civil Rights Division to be responsible. for their responses
to Congressional Committee requests.
ae RL I A NE or
Ww At the request of Assistant to the Deputy Attorney General

a meeting with Deputy Assistant Attorney General K. William ®'Connor,
Assistant to the Attorney General Jack Fuller, and Assistant to the

Deputy Attorney General Robert McDermott. ‘McDermott announced ~~

at the meeting that O'Connor was taking control of the Departmental
responses to the Congressional Committees. He noted that the Department
has been having some problems keeping track of and inconsistencies

in its responses to the various Congressional Committees. Mr. O'Connor
was generally briefed as to the status of our responses to Congressional
requests and to the Rockefeller Commission. He requested, however,

that he be briefed in a more detailed manner in the immediate future.

Robert McDermott, SA Paul V. Daly and Inspector John B. Hotis attende ae

ACTION: ALL FORMA
——— HEREIN IS Wry pe Sa TAINED ©
For information, BATE BY ~~ Ye)
~ a)
> Wy 3 Pl
1-Mr. Adams } git
1 - Mr. Wannall m ‘ca

1 7Mr WO. Creer oy 10h yen BON FLL b 35x75
f

1 - Mr. Hotis
1-Mr. Daly pi ® MAY 28 1975
PVD:dkg (8)

He
I! yp

g 4 JUN3 iS

NW 58296 Docid:32989568 Page 229


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
MAY 1962 EDITION
aS5A GEN, 29S. NO, 27

" UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
\i Memorandum

ro = GMR. W. R. WANNALL |

r
FROM . [oy Gancan

3010-106

B. Adams 7
A

. Aw Mintz

pateMay 8, 1975
1 - Me. J. B. Hotis

Assoc. Dir,
Dep. A Im.
Dep, A wis,

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.
Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs __
Files & Com,

Laboratory

:MR. W 1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall
a 1 - Mr. W. O, Cregar,
sugjecr (SENSTUDY 75 oo, a ey ; Spee, ewe
et : taining
} ye i Ware
This memorandum reports the results of a meeting srelephone Rm. —
between representatives of the Senate Select Committee (SSC) on

Staff and Bureau officials at Quantico, Virginia, on the evening /
of 5/5/75. , Jy
7 J |
Ww On 5/5/75 Mr. Jol E11iff, who heads the task force odl

\7 the SSC looking into the FBI, met with officials of the Bureau at

5 Quantico, ELLiff was accompanied by Mark/Gitenstein and Mary

| Oreo. FBI officials present were Assistant Director W. R.

* Wannall, Inspectors Thomas W. Leavitt, Hunter E. Helgeson, and
John B, Hotis as well as Section Chief William O. Cregar.

At the outset of the meeting, Mr. ELLiff provided the
Bureau representatives with a memorandum the subject of which was! i}
entitled-Pintelligence-Division Position Paper on Jurisdiction," +‘
dated 2/13/75, copy of which is attached. ELLif££'s memorandum
contained a series of questions along with the rationale for these
questions which provided the basis for the Quantico meeting. We
are not considering these questions a formal request from the
Select Committee. Mr, ELLiff and the Staff of the Select Committee
are aware that formal responses that the Bureau might be expected to
provide the Committee can only be predicated on written requests
to the Attorney General (AG) from Senator Frank Church or the

. Committee's Chief Counsel,

; It is noted that under paragraph one of EL1Liff's memo-
randum he notes the Committée has not been supplied the, gion Eas 5 “a

documents, REC AA OU e~ (Le 0) G sy
(1) if Hoste ag Wh. dated 7/31/72. _

“ i
® MAY 23 1998 A
&

(2) bpendices I, J, K, M, and P to the Intelligence
Division Paper on Jurisdiction" dated 2/13/75. aan ESSE eam
62-116395 |
Enclosure / ENCLOSURE . yn
Woctekwe Wau) fil INFORMATION \\
(6) ’ 9)

CONTAINED

REE ic. Lhier Fo Tee 7 ‘
aan LOBBY FD pee ED - OVER ©

; uh ose Nia 69588 Page 230

} S

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall
RE: SENSTUDY 75
62-116395

By memorandum dated 5/6/75, we advised the AG that
the requested position paper of 7/31/72 is an internal deliberative
document which we feel is inappropriate to furnish the Select
Committee, This position is consistent with the position previously
expressed by the AG. During the meeting with El1iff he was orally
advised of the Bureau's position regarding making the 7/31/72
position paper available to the Select Committee,

The Appendices which have not yet been made available
to the Select Committee are being cleared with other agencies
under the Third Agency rule requirement and will be made available
to the Select Committee once all clearances have been obtained.
EL1if£ was orally apprised of this.

During: the course of the meeting, Mr. ELLIf£ stated
that he felt the FBI's concerted investigative effort in the
early 1960s against the Klan and later our investigative effort
arising out of the ghetto riots were justified given the situation
at that time, However, he felt the Committee would probably
like to do an in-depth case study of both investigations. He
asked if the FBI could provide the Committee with copies of all
memoranda and documents reflecting the decision making process
leading up to the initiation of the major ‘investigative effort
against the Klan as well as investigations during and following
the ghetto riots. El1iff was advised that we certainly would
consider responding following receiptoof a formal written request
from Senator Church through the AG. El11Liff advised he would
prepare such a written request.

The Intélligence Division has already instituted the
necessary research in anticipation of this request and will submit
recommendations following a completion of this research,

In anticipation of Select Committee hearings which are
expected to begin in about one month, Mr. E1LLiff£ and Gitenstein
expect to start interviews of current Bureau employees in Bureau
space during the week of 5/19/75. Mr. Gitenstein will concentrate
on the work of the Internal Security Branch of the Intelligence
Division and Mr. ELLiff on the Counterintelligence Branch. We
expect that Mr, E11Liff will begin his interviews by meeting with
Assistant Director Wannall, Inspector Leavitt and the Section
Chiefs of the Counterintelligence Branch.

-2-
_ NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 231


' NW 88296 Dochd:32989508 Page 232

and suggest that some legislation with Congressional oversight

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall
RE: SENSTUDY 75
62-116395

It is noted that we previously furnished to the
Select Committee with the AG's approval one copy each of
Sections 87 and 122 of the Manual of Instructions. Section 87
is concerned with investigations of subversive organizations ~
and individuals. Section 122 addresses extremist matters and
civil unrest. In his discussion of these two Sections it was
readily apparent Mr. Gitenstein had condueted a thorough review.
In this regard, he noted a difference in the investigative procedure
outlined in these two Sections of the Manual. Mr. Gitenstein
was advised that the. Intelligence Division had just completed
a Manual revision combining these two Sections into one and had
submitted it to the Director for his approval. Mr. Gitenstein
commented this was an excellent idea to combine these two Sections
into one and expressed the hope that the revised Section could
be made available to the Committee for its review in anticipation
of the forthcoming Cotmmittee hearings. |

At the conelusion of the meeting, ELLiff£ asked whether
the FBI would .be willing to meet with the Staff to discuss such
sensitive issues as surreptitious entry, the opening of mail, and
incommunicado interviews. El11Liff was advised that the Bureau was
aware of certain allegations that have appeared in the press and
felt that any interviews in sensitive areas should be restricted
to the Senators on the Committee. EL1Liff interposed no objection
to this suggestion.

The thrust of the meeting gave Bureau officials present
the impression that the task force was primarily concerned with
identifying what areas of the Bureau's investigative responsi-
bilities needed to be better defined through new legislation.

In fact, ELLIf£ solicited the observations of those present as

to what the Bureau's needs were in the way of new legislation

to permit the Bureau to carry out its internal security responsi-
bilities effectively. He recognized certain limitations involving
records of educational institutions, banking institutions, telephone
companies and credit establishments currently restrict the Bureau —

should be written to assist the FBI in carrying out its mission.

~ 3.

> @
7 @ .
.

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall
RE: SENSTUDY 75
62-116395

ACTION:

(1) We will proceed tormeet with Mr, E11iff and
Mr, Gitenstein in accordance with their request. It is antici-
pated that an Intelligence Division official will be present at
all such interviews of current Bureau personnel.

(2) That the revietmn of the combined Sections of
87 and 122 by other Divisions of the Bureau be expedited in

order that we may be able to provide the Senate Select Committee
with this revision on an expedite basis,

4
» NW 86296 Docid:37989588 Page 233


Laws 88296. Docid: 32989588 Page; 234

2 Mee . ® , a

. May &, 1975 .
iC ORANDUM .

Subject: “Intelligence Division Position Paper on Jurisdiction”
dated February 13, 1975

1. The following documents directly related to this Position ~
Paper have not been supplied to the Select Committee:

(1) The previous Position Paper, dated July 31, 1972.

~~

(2) Appendices I, J, K, M, and P.

2. Parts I and II discuss the Presidential directives which
May serve as the basis for FBI national security intelligence
activities. Part IV lists statutes. and Executive Orders
affecting FBI jurisdiction. There is no mention in Parts I and
It of the first Executive Order cited in Part IV. This is
Executive Order #11605, dated July 2, 1971, amending Executive
Orcer #10450, of April 27, 1953, relating to security require-

mantke fav Covornmeont AT eee ee
enero SDS SOO RS Capa yan ce

These Executive Orders have been further amended by
a more recent Executive Order of June 4, 1974. This latest
order abolished the so~called "Attorney General's List" and
revised the criteria for determining the suitability and
loyalty of Government employees.

The following questions arise:

_ (1) In what way, if any, do the Executive Orders
relating to employment security provide a legal
basis for FBI intelligence activities?

(2) In what way, if any, did the Executive Order of
June 4, 1974, affect the legal basis for FBI
intelligence activities? .

3. The analysis in Parts. ‘I and II discusses the legal basis

for FBI national security intelligence investigations. There

is no specific discussion of other intelligence activities.

These other activities are variously described in the attached
documents and quoted memoranda. The terms used include .
“counterespionage" (Presidential Directive of June 26, 1939), es

NFORMATION CONTR
fae Daa’ a er

bee

oe


. @ r
2a

"to neutralize Communist front and Communist-dominated organi-
zations of the United States" (IIC and ICIS Report to NSC,
March 5, 1954), "program designed to intensify any confusion and
- dissatisfaction among its /Communist Party's/ members" and
"“counterintelligence operations" (NSC Briefing, November 6, 1958),
"action proposals to protect the internal security of the United.
States" (National Security Action Memorandum 161, dune 9, 1962).
The term "counterespionage" reappears in several other documents.
These terms seem to refer to activities which have since
been labeled COINTELPRO operations. In this regard, it should
be noted that Attorney General Saxbe's-.report of November 18,
1974 on FBI COINTELBRO Activities stated, at p. 20:
“(2) Espionage or Soviet-Satellite intelligence
This program, although officially designated
a COINTELPRO program, emphasized intelligence gathering
and counterintelligence efforts already being pursued
in connection with the Bureau's ongoing foreign intelli-~
gence responsibilities. It did not curtail any activity
or in any way change the scope of counterintelligence
efforts already in effect and continuing today. It was
primarily intended to inspire initiative and to encourage
ingenuity in the Bureau's continuing counterintelligence
efforts against hostile foreign intelligence services.”
‘-In the interest of the national security, no
_ statistics or examples of the types of actions imple=
mented under this program may appropriately be disclosed."

This passage seems to say that the FBI continues to perform
other activities going beyond investigation and directed at
hostile foreign intelligence services.

The following questions arise:

(Ll) In what wayr if any, do the Presidential directives
discussed in Parts I and II provide a legal basis
for FBI national security intelligence activities
beyond investigations?

(2) In what way, if any, do the Presidential directives
discussed in Parts I and II provide a legal basis
for the COINTELPRO activities which have been
discontinued as a matter of policy since 1971?

y oO
NW 88796 Docld:32989588 Page 235. °

(3) In what way, if any, do the Presidential directives
, , discussed in Parts I and II provide a legal basis
for the FBI's continuing counterintelligence efforts
against hostile foreign intelligence services?

4. Appendix S includes excerpts from the appropriations testimony

of former Director Hoover. The testimony in 1939 and‘'1941 makes
“|. veference to President Roosevelt's Proclamation of National
Emergency, September 8, 1939. The following exchange took place
a -“at-the hearing on Pebruary 19, 1941: a . 7,

Mr. Ludlow. At the close of the present emergency, when
peace comes, it would mean that much of this emergency
. work necessarily will be discontinued.
Mr. Hoover. That is correct.
Mr. Taber:. Is your set-up for the national-defense work
separate from the other work?
Mr. Hoover. It is.

Oo - Ahan Pm Wm oe re a wai . co Nenivartatinateniver At wet at nO ~~ om awe
wae oO AMI ® te Zt operated asa Me Pua Le GAUVLSioms

Mr. Hoover. Yes. In the field our field officials
‘are under instructions to utilize approximately 50
percent of the personnel on national defense work
and the other 50 percent on the regular work.

Mr. Taber. But if some rush comes up, you might have

to vary that?

Mr. Hoover. That is correct.
_,Mr. Taber. According to the situation. hes
’ Mr. Hoover. According to the emergency that might arise.
If the national emergency should terminate, the
structure dealing with national defense can immediately
be discontinued or very materially curtailed according
to the wishes of Congress.

When President Roosevelt issued the Proclamation of National
Emergency on September 8, 1939, he accompanied it with Executive
Order No. 8247 directing the Attorney General to "increase the
personnel of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of
Justice, in-such number, not exceeding 150, as he shall find
necessary for the proper performance of the additional duties .
imposed upon the Department of Justice in connection with the ‘
national emergency." At a press conference the same day, :

wee - - ~~

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 236 ;

: . . ° . ‘.
ce % . ‘ ° ¥
“~ . . .
‘

President Rooseveit specifically discussed this Execulive
Order and the nature of the "additional duties imposed upon
the Department of Justice."
% : .
"And the fourth /Executive Order/ relates to what
you might say is a combination of neutrality’ and national
defense. It provides for an addition to the personnel
; of certain investigating agencies of the Government to
NO protect this country against-~I suppose the easiest way
: of putting it is--some of the episodes, some of the
--7- ‘things that happened over here in 1914 and 1915 and
: 1916 and the beginning of 1917, before we got into the
“war. There was, sabotage; there was a great deal of
propaganda by both belligerents, and a good many definite
plans laid in this country by foreign governments to try
to sway American public opinion. We do not have to
specify. . The older men who are here can remember some
of the episodes of that time. It is to guard against
that, and against the spread by any foreign nation of
propaganda in’ this country whicn would tend to be
subversive--I believe that is the word--of our form of
Government." (1939 Roosevelt Papers 485-486)

The following questions arise:

(1) To what extent, if any, were the Presidential
' Girectives of June 26, 1939 and September 6, 1939,
based on the emergency powers of the President?

(2) To what extent, if any, was the establishment of

. the FBI's Intelligence Division in September, 1939,
based on the President's Proclamation of National
Emergency and Executive Order No. 8247?

(3) To what extent, if any, does Congress have the
Constitutional authority to discontinue or curtail
the FBI's national security intelligence activities

. based on the President's emergency powers or on
: other Constitutional powers of the Executive Branch?

on

beck
ae

NW 60296 Docld:32909508 Page 237

e
Se et


\
po

: Legal coumel eel | et
O i Bis 1 Pion & beak

/SENSTUDY 75 raining | %
{ ENSTUDY 75 bowl cou

|
|
|

Bv4e24h'8 Dochd: $ioses Page 238

\ =

FROM

SUBJECT:

4

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 5010-106
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN, REG. NO. 27

,

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Assoc. Dir.
Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep, AD Inv. —

Memorandum ee

Admin,

Comp. Syst. —_.

Mr. J. B. Adams pate: 5/16/75 Files & Con
Gen, Inv.
Ident.

Spec. Inv

uw 4 Pa
eee” Telephone Blas

Director Sec'y —
At approximately 3:20 PM, former SA David E. Todd

(EOD as SA 1/5/42; retirement 12/9/71) called long distance from

San Francisco and spoke to Deputy Assistant Director Herington.

He said that he had been contacted by Lester B. Seidel, Senate Select
Committee, who said that he would be on the west Goast in the near

future and desired to interview Todd concerning FBI policies with

regard to investigation of racial matters and our counterintelligence
programs against the Black Panthers and other groups. Todd pointed

out that he was a former supervisor of the San Francisco Office desk
responsible for Black Panther cases. Todd asked what position he LA
should take. He was advised that his decision as to whether or not to
be interviewed was entirely his and that the Bureau could not make <
any suggestion in this regard. It was pointed out that if he decided to [a
be interviewed, we had made arrangements with the Senate Select:.

Fommittee which would permit a Bureau representative to be available

or consultation with regard to matters that might seem sensitive, but

that the Bureau representative would not be present during or participate

in the actual interview. He was advised further that he had the same

rights as any other citizen, namely, the right to personal counsel and

any other rights guaranteed him under the Constitution. Pursuant to

his request, he was also advised of the provisions of Attorney General

Order 501-73 which appears in Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations,
beginning at Section 16.21, which would‘require appropriate Departmental
approval prior to any current or former employee revealing, pursuant to

a subpoena or other demand, any information acquired during the course

of the employee's official duties. He was also a7, ng all Bureau a Ss) 7

employees had signed a secrecy agreement,
° bd MMCIIS-

1- Mr. Adams

1 - Mr. Wannall REC. Gh a MAY 22 1975

1 - Mr. Mintz = q
1 - Mr. Hotis ST-101 an em ME!

1 - Mr. Herington

JH:mtm au .
Biy f
(6) HERS sige ee ap wl? a Al 7 tid OVER nee

DATE BY

~
woe N .
a *

Memo to Mr. J. B. Adams
Re: SENSTUDY 75

Todd indicated that while he desired to respond as legally
required to an official committee inquiry, he would advise Mr. Seidel
that he considered himself bound by the Attorney General Order and did
not feel that he could reveal official information without approval by the
appropriate Department official. Todd was clearly advised that this
decision had to be hig own and that the FBI could not and would not make
any recommendation to him as to the course of action he should take.

RECOMMENDATION:

For information.
YF Ope“

wee

NW 85296 Docid:32989508 Page 239
|

%. a
ae, OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 ‘ 5010-106
MAY 1963, EDITION
e GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27
UNITED STATES G' NMENT : | Assoct’Dir. —__*
Dep. AD Adm. —
/ Dep. AD Inv. __
Memorandum Asst Dit

Admin,

Comp. Syst. —_

(L_- Ext. Affairs
Mpa Files & Com.
Gen. Inv.
je? Ident,

Inspection

Intell.
Laboratory

eS

TO : Me. Cleverangyl DATE: 5-8~75

FROM : G. R. stee1q@

E scuner SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC) syn —
Te he Rm,

HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ,
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (HSC)

lv” vey
Reference is made to ny OE dated ,4-3-75 captionéd
eI ixB

as above (ce attached}.

Director See’y __

This is to advise that as of 5-7-75 we have received
and ordered to the field a total of 96 requests from the SSC for
investigations of its staff members. An additional case was
received on 5-8-75 which is being ordered to the field immediately.
As a result of referenced memo, Inspector Bowers contacted the.
SSC which was in accord with a more realistic deadline on
remaining investigations, except "a few'' specials which wo
still be handled on an expedite basis, such as afforded
Presidential appointments. Of all cases received to date
only six have been designated as nonexpedite. nr ae

It is noted recent articles in the media have contained
criticism of Congressman Lucien Nedzi for delay in staffing the
HSC and proceeding with its inquiry. On 3-3~75 Inspector Bowers
discussed with the Congressman the mechanics for FBI investi-
gations of the HSC staff. In the intervening period no cases
were received except one Sri ease from the HSC which has

GA uff E#EY*

been ordered to the fiel concerns Carl Hendrickson Simms,
Security Director, HSC, OF erly connected with the House
impeachment inquiry. Simms has been in contact with our Project
Senstudy 79, group. It is not Known when additional inv s igation

By a

will be. aseeived from the HSC, — 3
a

acrtone) got age ~f{L6 BYE WEP

a i Parente ; Mt

' Sor information. v3 panes to

B MAY 20 1975 )

4oN CLOSURE Au INFORMATION CONTAINED (un :
} “ mc. HERE! NOU AT IIFIE er ee a
DATE BY y ;

1 - Mr. Adams 1 - Mr. Cleveland ”?

1 - Mr. Mintz - (Legal Analysis Office) 1 ~ Mr. Steel 3
XWROE !

54) ee 0) a tty Te so
~ mu 75 se JO aes hes

NW 88296 Dochd:32969508 Page #40


NW-88296 Docld:32989588 Page 241

My, Claveland

&. R, &¢eel,

SENATE SELECT COMMITTER ON
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVE TLaS “4 “<S aed ~

HOUSE BBLEST OG. pte o yen a te to
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES Gi5C)

By agreemcnt, the FRI is currently conducting full field
investigations verurding SSC staff personnel. These have extremely
short (2 week) deadlines which are identical te those afforded
Presidential aprointments and ere, therefore, given preferential
trentnent in opening, assigning, and following field progress, The
Special Inquiry Unit of the Employees Security and Specie] Incuiry -
Section, which has about twice its normal case load, is handling
these recuasts. Senater Church, Chairman, S6e, originally estinated
-that between 35 and 46 staffi members would he submitted for inveosti-
' gation. As of today, 4-J3+76, we hava reesived roquesta for &5 Buck
invedtigaticns from the 830 and the end Goes not appear to be i
Sight. They are reevived in bunches as many as & nt a time, which
is not the even flow expected and presents an additionszl burden.

. Ir addition it is expected that gdimilar requests wikl be
forthcoming in the near future from the HSC since we have = similar
agresment with i¢. Congressman Nedzi, Chairman of the HSC, kas
estimated ‘probably no more than about 25 staff wonbers will be
hired.” [It remains te be seen ig this estinate alsa falls short of
actual receipts.

Since there is no charges for these full f1eld investications

they will have to be considered in the budget. It is nosed the
@urrent charge for & full field investigation, where applicabie, is
$2028.

ACTION: Fex information, Since it appears the nucleus of the
Gouaittee has been forned, it is suggested Senator Church be son-
tacted and queried regarding @ more renlistia (20 day} deadline on:
the remaining investigations concerning future stafi members and
theiy replacements.

Lr ~ Hr, Walsh 7 ir. Cleveland
~ tr. Stee
GRE:de a
Gee ALL WeTOT CATION CONTAINED
HEREIN doth
DATE BY'

: (At)
EZ 110248
HATO ea daok,

Fz


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 . 50105106
MAY 1962 EDITION .
GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27 + n.d

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Assoc. Dir.
Dep. AD Adm. _
Dep. AD Inv.

Memorandum ae

M . min.
\ A Comp. Syst. ___
ad : Mr. Ww. R. Wannall en DATE: 5/2/15 Wr Est. Alfotes —
beeen - iles om.
ay) cn
FRoM : Mr. H. E. Helgeson ’ jc
4, Laboratory

fO " a, ; Plan. & Eval,
Spec. Inv.

SUBJ Bqh SENSTUDY 75 7 ‘4 rd

ape fe bn

(e tor Sec’y _

atl

ie ae.
RON re napa

At about 1 p.m., 5/2/75, ASAC Herbert D. Clough,
Newark Division, called to furnish the following information:

The Newark Office had just been contacted by former
Bureau Supervisor Dan Brennan, retired, who resides at Sea Girt,
New Jersey. Brennan advised that he had been contacted earlier
today by Mike Epstein of the Senate Select Committee who
desired to talk to Brennan today and an appointment was set up.
Epstein was to arrive at Newark around noon and then drive to
Sea Girt, about an hour's travel. Based on information furnished VY
at the recent conference in New York, Newark had dispatched an
Agent to be present during this interview as requested by Dan Brenan"

After completing my conversation with Clough, I discussed
this matter with John Hotis, Office of Legal Counsel, and it was
concluded the Agent from Newark who would be present during

+ nel
= the interview should call-Office of Legal Counsel, speak to Hotis,
2 and obtain general guidelines for his participation in this interview.
st on
= 3 ASAC Clough was recontacted and so instm cted. I also ;
sd az asked Clough to get in touch with me later in the day to ] me know. _ \B5
SE med what transpired. A) (9 I- 3 Y (~~ 1s
po Lad — fom |
=Z action: ae ot (G ’
~~ . CATE - .
Ba BP} A 16 MAY 291975\
9 Oe For information. ‘ g ) i
CERES
- Naat
62-116395 ALL hragton CONTAINGO a
MIE UNCLASSIF fia
1- Mr. Adams Ae Paco 1 is S21 Ady bt.) i"
1- Mr. Mintz ger
1- Mr. Wannall so
1- Mr. Cregar
HEH:mah
g 4 JUN 3°) 1975

NW 86296 Docid:327989568 Page 242


» w OPTIONAL FORM NO. 16- 5010-108 be”
+ OR Gere aco. wo, 27 . rg
” UNITED STATES » ae é Arcos, Die
. ep. Adm, _

- Memorandum | eae

Comp. Syst.

i Ext. Affairs
TO r Mr. J. B. Adams . A DATE: May 12, 1975 Files & Conon
' tee, Gen. Inv.
‘ Ident.
; ae a Inspection
FROM t Legal counsel ely on io Teds “4 5 udfl ea, Intel ‘
. * Laboratory
| ae a die
ane BE Yoh"
SUBJ CT: ISSUE PAPER © AINTELLIGENCE FILES AND vmrnoe | Spec. Inv.

eS ae ee ieee Training

x
y Telephone Rm. __
» - Director Soc’y

The Executive Committee of the Ad Hoc Co-
ordinating Group on Congressional Review of the Intel-
ligence Community identified ten issues likely to grow
out of the Select Committee's deliberations. The
Executive Committee asked the FBI to prepare a paper
on one of these topics, Intelligence Files and Privacy.
Specifically, the request was for a brief paper which
raises the issues observed by the intelligence agencies

i when intelligence files and privacy are viewed together
| without, suggesting or recommending how the questions
' should be resolved.

. J. D. Miller drafted an outline which was
discussed on April 16, 1975, with. representatives of the
CIA and Departments of Defense and Treasury. On April 21,
this outline was presented by Mr. Hotis to the Executive
Committee which received it without comment. Mr. Miller
then prepared a rough draft which was discussed at a
meeting on April 22, with the representatives of the CIA i
and Department of Treasury. J
a

Mr. Miller's final draft is attached. It
discusses both intelligence files and the concept of
privacy in general terms before focusing on the issues
; which present themselves when an effort is made to

H establish the proper relationship between the two.

ee Enclosure REG-37 Gb a. / / 639 — / SY
Ah 1-Mr. Adams ee

UNE: Wemnet ST tag B May 201075
| -Mr. Cregar Heeeiye on CONTAINED —_—

; DIN ELLE oe i
: 1-Mr. Clevel andy i SF “ny
1-Me. Miller Leos BY

IDM: lgp’ 2 Sos \\ x
(8) :

CONTINUED — OVER’ ‘~.

Tar
| SSMAY2 9 1075

UNW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 243


Memo from Legal Counsel to J. B. Adams
ISSUE PAPER ON INTELLIGENCE FILES AND PRIVACY

RECOMMENDATION:

The issue paper entitled Intelligence Files and
Privacy be submitted by Mr. Hotis to the Executive Committee
of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group on Congressional Review
of the Intelligence Community.

of!

NW 68296 Docid:32989588 Page 244

‘ DPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN. REG, NO. 27

i

v FROM

' L ~ UNITED STATES §%
Q Memorandum

v° : Mr. J. B. Adams

: Legal Counsé i——

ERNMENT

suneee> SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
ONINTELTLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

“REQUEST OF 4-38-17

(3 MG
9 LOD

ffs “ed

cong

Qos
e of the captioned requests.
AN
ae
Seg
aK & the Attorney General's office.
y

Also taco
Field Office requesting-tha) an appropriate inquiry be made among

mere AD Adm. —
ep. AD Inv, __

1 - Each Assistant Director-Eneseo..

Comp. Syst. —__
Ext. Affairs —_
Files & Com, —
Gon. Inv.

1 - Mr. Cregar-Encs. Admin,

1 - Mr. Hotis-Enc.

DATE: 5-2—

1 - Mr. Mintz-Encs. Ident.

1 -Mr. Daly-Encs.

Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory

Lega! Coun. __
Plon. & Eval. —_.

Spec. Inv.
Training

Telephone Rm. _

Director Sec’y _.

REQUEST OF SUBCOMMITTEE ON CIVIL

AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, COMMITTEE
ON THE JUDICIARY, U. S. HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES DATED 4-25-75

On 5-2-75, Doug Marvin, Assistant to the Attorney
General, furnished SA Paul V. Daly two ) requests from Congressional
Committees pertaining to an allegation that documents were removed
from former Director J. Edgar Hoover's residence in Washington,D. C.,
following the death of Mr. Clyde Tolson. Attached are copies of gach

\2..

Each Assistant Director is to canvass ‘his.. Division and
furnish on an expedite ‘basis any information they may develop considering
this allegation. Responses should be directed to the Legal Analysis
Office, Legal Counsel Division, so that the response may be prepared
for the appropriate Corigressional Committees and forwarded through,

REC 8

¢ approval is an Orel to the Washington

2416 395+

Field Office personnel so that these allegations may be responded to.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

ANA OESSEL 4,

1

© MAY 20 1975 {

(1) That Assistant Directors make appropriatezinquiry_of
personnel concerning the allegations contained in the aforementioned
letters and forward results of inquiry to the Legal Analysis Office,
Legal Counsel Division, so that responses may be prepared to the

Committees' réquest.

# eweulsing

Enclosures
PVD: dkg (19)

nvrtollL hs O IMR te Page 245

ALL INFO RE 87 fa
HEREIN seater AINE,
DATE JOB

ts eagye)

RECOMMENDATIONS
CONTINUED - OVER

ED COPY EiLED i

ree
Ammen

§

. “
) Assoc. Dir.

“a nea WAR eee

BD)

= A merewverie pa


Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams Memo

Re: Senate Select Committee on t
Intelligence Activities |

(2) The attached airtel to the Washington Field Office be
approved and sent making inquiry of that Office concerning allegations
contained in the aforementioned letters.

(3 gle Ae hy
K\ 4% Soft y;
He op

Pr)
. met
Ab i ae er ae
: ‘ as ‘
¢ of of ea ‘ee A Oe pot on ate
i tt Saw (PEG
gh y & a ef u we a paren OE
ye ace yor ea yf
ae et yah PL
rc . é ‘, a A aol
a eT) ee
a aaa mn pe
£2 [hd 4 ‘ ares By BE
put ye ? 5 ar Fa
gu? ae) e yp
? oo gi
yee ot
eo?
-2-

|
|
|
NW 88296 Docid:22989588 Page 246


RAN CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIR

. a . .
. JOHN G. TOWRA, TEXAS, VICE | -
PHILIP A, HART, MICH, . . .

“ROWARO H. BAK Ei. JRA. TENN.
WALTEP F, MS*.DALE, MINN, BARRY GOLOWATER, AxIZ.
> WALTER G. HUROUESTON, KY, CHARLES MCS. MATHIAS, JR. MO,
ROBERT StORGAN, N.C. RICHARD S. SCHWEIKSK, PAL ae if 2 St £ Sy 4
, T. 7 -
WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR eeh tthe Cis execs
-FREOERICK A, 0. SCHWARZ, SR., CHIEF COUNSEL,

CURTIS R, SMOTHERS, MINORITY COUNSEL, -

SELECT COMMITTEE TO
STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH
RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT To S. RES, 21, UTH CONGRESS)

’ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

April 28, 1975

Honorable Edward H. Levi

et

+a

Attorney General rao
U. S. Department of Justice ~D
Washington, D. ¢. 20530 th

Dear Mr. Attorney General:
Last week's issue of Newsweek, on page 15,
states:

: Hoover's Secrets
: \
Following the death last week of Clyde
Tolson, J. Edgar Hoover's tlose friend and No.
2,man at the FBI, two FBI agents reportedly
removed some documents from the late director's
house in Washington, where Tolson had been liv~
ing. Officially, the FBI denies taking any
such action, and a friend of Tolson's says the
' only Hoover documents Tolson had were old can-
celed checks and tax returns. But Newsweek had
reported earlier that some of Hoover's private
dossiers, including information "very, very
damaging" to persons in the Nixon White House,
were left in Tolson's custody, and a source

told Newsweek this week that the materials were
carted away in a truck.

Assuming that the files in question may be part
of the so-called "Official and Confidential” files, your
testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on February
27, 1975, is instructive. You said that the number of
files which you reviewed contained matters relating te
"Presidential directives regarding the role of the F3I in
the security 7ieid" and to the matters related to "domestic
Bolo OS eRTAINED
HERE ae ay eel le ;

DATE DEQ BY

»

Sy ee

wh at wie

i ERCLOSUIE

aw 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 247 - _ C a 41. 3 7o— 53

Ss

4

a emer

. a
, .
rn .- . ~ "
‘ . -
.

Honorable Edward H. Levi
Page Two -April 28, 1975

violence", "intelligence activities by hostile nations",
"domestic extremist activities", and use of the FBI to
gather political intelligence.

Furthermore, at the same time, Director Kelley
suggested that materials from the "Official and Confiden-
tial" files were taken to Director Hoover's home. He
stated:

Immediately after his death /Mr. Hoover's/
some of his employees, including his personal
yo secretary, went through his files and completed
‘ the destruction of the remainder of the files
that were purely personal. ‘These were destroyed
. by shredding. Some I understand were taken out
i to his home and placed in his home, they being
historical I presume to some extent. There is
no indication that they were other than personal
files.

: Please determine for the Select Committee whether
‘ any documents were removed from Mr. Tolson's or Mr. Hoover's

residence by FBI agents or former FBI agents after
Mr. Tolson's death. If agents of the FBI did go to
Mr. Hoover's or Mr. Tolson's' residence to remove files,
please provide the Select Committee with a complete des-
ecription of the documents’ taken into custody by the FBI.
Were any such documents copies or originals of documents
relating to the business of the FBI? If so, please des-
cribe the subject matter of each such document. Also
indicate the individual within the FBI who has custody
over these files. Furthermore, I respectfully request on
behalf of the Select Committee that such files not be des-
troyed or removed from the FBI's custody until further

_ notice.

ee re ee cepa erent eye uerer at wechernberrwwes arenes pr aed tape rmch terme mamtepanatet ws Esemafe eo wala atte tte E cap Bath eran ET ie OR AE Pe PIR IY RE I LN ees

i , “7
Sincerely, | /
i ¢ ‘ 7
tS gy ety te
Frank Church
Chairman

NW 58296 Docid:32989568 Page 243


“9

. on ,

cad

’ NIN TY-FOURTH CONGRESS
. a

——-.

POTER W, RODINO, JR, (13,2,), CHAIRMAN

JACK BRODK 3, TEX,

ROUEAT W, KASTENMEICR, WIS,
DCN ES WARUS, CALIF,
WILLIAM L. HUNGATE, MO.
JOHN CONYERS, JA., MICH.
JOSHUA ZILBENG, PA.
WALTER FLOWERS, ALA,
JAMES R. MANN, S.C.

PAUL 5, SARBANZS, MO.
JOHN F, SEIZERLING. OHIO
GEORGE E. DANIELSON, CALIF.
ROBERT F. ORINAN, MASS,
BARSARA JORDAN, TEX.

RAY THORNTON, ARK.
EUZAGETH HOLTZMAN, NeY.
EDWARD MEZVINSKY, LOWA
HERMAN EASILLO, N.Y.
ROMANO L. MAZZOLI, KY.
EDWARD W. PATTISON, 4.Y.
CHRISTOPHER J, DODD, CONN.

- GHARLES C, WIGGINS, CALIF,

EQWARD HUTSHINSON, ACH,
ROVERT Mc CLORY, ILL.
TOM RAILSEACK, ILL,

HAMILTON FISH, JI.. N.Y.

M, CALOWCLL BUTLER, VA,
WILLIAM S, COHEN, MAINE
CARLOS J, MOORHEAD, CALIF.
JOUN M. ASHSROCK, OHIO
HENRY J. HYDE, ILL.
THOMAS N. KINDNESS, OHIO

: 6

Wommittee on the Judiciary
Mouse of Representatives
Washington, BC. 20515

Weleph te: 202-225-3951

Congress of the United States

GCUNERAL COUNSEL:

EARL. C. DUDLEY, JR.

STAFF OINECTOR:

GARNER J, CLINE

COUNSEL:

HERGERT FUCHS
WILLIAM B, SHATTUCK
ALAN A, PARKER
JAMES F. FALCO
MAURICE A. BARSOZA
ARTHUR P. ENORES, JR.
THOMAS W. HUTCHISON
DANIEL L. COHEN
FRANKLIN G, POLK
‘THOMAS E. MOONEY
MICHAEL, W. BLOMMER
ALEXANDER B. COOK
CONSTANTINE J. GEKAS:
ALAN F. COFFEY, JR.

oe ranconi tia RECE icp oe
. we I he § OP
April 25, 1975 re
iA’ 2 19 3

The Honorable Edward H. Levi
Attorney General of the United States
Department of Justice

Washington, D. C. 20539

Dear Mr, Attorney General:

In the most recent issue, April 28, 1975, of Newsweek's
"Periscope" section, it is alleged that following the death of Clyde
‘ Tolson, J. Edgar Hoover's close friend and top assistant, FBI agents |
removed documents from the late FBI’ Director's house, in which Mr.
Tolson had been living. The article further alleges that the docu-
ments removed were of the nature of private dossiers.
| _ During the hearing of the Subconmmittee on Civil and Con-
‘ stitutional Rights of the House Committee on the Judiciary, on
; February 27,°1975, it was asserted that papers delivered te-the home
of 'J, Edgar Hoover after his death were of a purely historical or
personal nature. In keeping with the Subcormittee's oversicht juris-
diction of the FBI, I respectfully remest that the Department of
dustice make an independent investigation of the alleaations made by
the Newsweek writer and report hack to the Subcamitten wichin a
reasonable Eime, This investigation should covor these points:
1. Were any documents or other material renovel
from the home of the late FRI Director hv adents
of the FBI, or others unier the direction of tha

FBI or the Department of Justice, after the deat

-t om > . “ wee te
of Clyde Tolson? ssp EL EP TT,
2, If it is determine? that documents or other 5
material were removed, on whose authority was such fe
action initlatel? "

ALLE 8 ONTAINED
| Dare ESO) ha, pire
yor -

\53

yh “ee
ChLOSun

62% -WE 2h

NW 862796 Docld:327989588 Page 249


oa
4

Hl

:

:

The Honorable Edward H. Levi -
April 25, 1975

Pade 2
3. What was the nature of the material removell?
4, For what purpose wore the materials removed?
5. Was it the same material delivered to the home
of J. Edgar Hoover after his death?
6. If it is true that the materials delivered to the
home of J. Edgar Hoover after his death were of an
historical or personal nature, and that all or some of
these same materials were reroved after the death of
Clyde Tolson, what legal rationale can be used to give
oA the FBI any interest in, or authority to remove, such
documents to their own possession? .
‘Your prompt consideration of this matter is
i appreciated. ‘
; Sincercly,
| \ : Don Edwands
i ; Chairman
| Subcommittee on Civil and
| : Constitutional Rights
DE:ss

—NW-88296—Deeld:32989588—Rage 250

Congress of the Elnites States
thouse af Representatives
Uashington, D.C, 20515

\ OFFICIAL BUSINESS
\ ~
Bir ;
ee
ee =
aA The Honorable Mdwand H. Levi
2 Attorney Generwil of the United States
oe) Department f Justice
a0 Washineton, D.C. 20530
hate ,
“_ ag
\ 3
v

an

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 251


TO MR. JENKINS DATE: 5/5/75 Files
? . . ‘ ident. ___|
t inspection ___
FROM D.W . MO RE ” oR. tnrell.

ve . passe —|
. Plow a Eva 1

SURECT: orype a, TOLSON Tinie,
Teisshone Rm. _|

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 252 a

” artiona, rate NO, 10

I010= 106

TH EDITION .
"GSA GEN REG! NO. 27 {

" UNITED STATES VERNMENT  . @ . Dep. AD Adm. .

~ : Dep. AD Inv. _.
Memorandum , : He Di

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Aficirs —_

Files & Com _

Asape. Dir. |

FORMER ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR :
. Director Sec'y _|

- The April 28, 1975, issue of "Newsweek" magazine
on page 15 under its "Periscope" section, referred to Mr.
Tolson's death and claimed that 2 Agents reportedly removed
documents from Hoover's residence where Tolson had been
living. The article, captioned "Hoover's Secrets," carried
the FBI's denial of such action and also stated that a friend
of Tolson's said the only Hoover documents Tolson had were
old cancelled checks and tax returns. However, the article |
added that "Newsweek" had reported earlier that some of Hoover's
private dossiers, including information "very, very damaging"

'

to persons in the Nixon White House, were left in Tolson's

custody. "Newsweek" further claimed that a source:advised that
the materials were carted away’ in a truck.

Mr. Kelley has asked of Messrs. Callahan, Jenkins,
Adams and Moore, "Do you have any idea where such a story got _

started? Ky.”

My memorandum to you of 4/17/75 captioned as above

(copy attached) pointed out that Tony Marro, "Newsweek" reporter,
contacted my office that date advising he had heard from a

source to the effect that 2 Agents were sent to Tolson's residence
the day of his death with a truck and carted away some files
which were subsequently brought to the home cf Mr. John P.

Mohr, former Assistant to the Director. Upon checking with

Mr. Mohr, Marro was advised there was absolutely no truth

to the story. It should be noted that Mr. Mohr also advised

at that time that most of the furnishings at Mr.-Tolson's

home have been removed over tthe past several months and that
there were some associates of the family and Annie, the housekeeo
who had stopped by the house on the day of the death with

some empty boxes to help remove additional furnishings.

ALL INTOMESATION CONTAINED

Ene. :
HEREIN IS LING: a G ,

1 ~ Mr. Callahan - 1 - Mr. Moore DATE

1 - Mr. Jenkins 1 - Mr. Heim
1 ~- Mr. Adams 1 - Mr. Malmfeldt

(CONTINUED)
TMM: Jo, .

OP re —-
ite ed Wb $2159 |

TASURE


NW 88296 Docid:32989508 Page #53

Moore to Jenkins Memo (cont'd.)
Res CLYDE A. TOLSON

Based ‘upon a request from Mr. Mohr to Mr. Callahan,
a Bureau clerk did go to the residence of Mr. Tolson on the day
of his death whereupon he delivered some 24 boxes and 6 rolis
of tape. The clerk merely delivered the boxes and tape and
then left the residence. We have no idea what was placed in
the boxes nor how this story started in the first place. °

RECOMMENDATION :

For informatio


7 . - Ay. ~ 7 te ” .

| Pm. MOORE, che | Cog Aste ne

_ CLYDE A. TOLSON De a So en Se
' FORMER PDI RSSOCIATE “DIRECTOR ee

Y mony Mérro, *yjeusweok” magazine, “Washington, D.C.y °

“ “ealted this morning advising that he had heard from a source 1:

' who hag bean reliable in the past, to the effect that two

Agents were sent to the home of Clyie Tolson Honday evening, —
4/24/15, the day of his death, with a truck’and car ted away.
sone files which wers subsequently brought to the home of
Mes John 2 Eobr, former Assistant to the Dizactor. :
SO, “Open ‘checking with Mr. vonr, B Marre was ‘advised -
that there vas absolutely no truth to his sptery. It shonld ~
be noted that Mr. Hohr advised that most of the furnishings
.at Me. Polson’s home have been removed over the past several

: “months and that there were some associates of the faniiy and

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 254

Annie, the housekeeper, who had stopped by the housa sometime

’ Monday with some empty boxes to help remove additional furn xish~
ings. As you know, Mr. Mobr is the Administrator of Mr.
Tolson's estate and stated that there wags simply no teath

to the allegation that any Agents had gone to tha homa in a
truck to kvansfer any files to his residences | as aiiegeds . a 7

For Information.

. bom Br. Callahan : ns . oo
de ~- ure Jenkins a oe,
Mr. Adans . : a

ae Mr, Moore

. . . ree “ig
~ Me, Heim c. heRSy fear
y ~ Mr. MalmFeldt DATE

THMzjo ° ,
(7) qe . . , . : .


q ors
SUBJECT: . SENSTUDY oo me Speen
“ eal Telephone Rm. —
By memorandum dated 4-30 a 5, directed to the Director Secty

nw of2ddAicord) tHasea

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 * ) 5010106 © t } ‘ .

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA SEN. REG. NO. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Assoc, Dire

Dep. Ae

Dep. A!

Memorandum fees

Admin.
Comp. Syst. ——
Ext. Affairs ——

: Mr. J.. B. Adams DATE: 5-D-75 Files & Com.

Gen. Inv.
ee
: Legal ie
”

aft Inepeetion

Intell.

. &
ct sfabo: aye
ia) Plong&Eval.
Spec. Inv.

Deputy Attorney General and the Director of the FBI, signed by’ Chief
Counsel of the Senate Select Committee (SSC) Frederick A. O. Schwarz,
Jr., the SSC had made additional requests of the FBI. Their requests are
divided into four separate areas which are as follows: (1) Request for
prior changes in the Manual of Instructions, to those sections of the
Manual of Instructions which they have already had access to. (2) Request
to review certain sections_of the Manual of Instructions not previously

furnished the Committee. A review of this list discloses generally

these sections do not pertain to foreign or domestic intelligence investigations
and some do not appear to be within the ambit of Senate Resolution 21 which
charters the authority of the SSC Regarding the sections of the Manual ° |

of Instructions, the request stated they would be satisfied with reviewing wor
them at FBI Headquarters. (3) Request certain sections of the Manual

of Rules and Regulations be made available for review by SSC representatives | ‘
at FBI BI Headquarters. As in request #2, some of the sections do not

appear to be within the scope of Senate Resolution 21. Among the sections

of the Manual of Rules and Regulations requested are such sections as those
concerning disciplinary matters and administration of offices. (4) A

general request uest_ conerning the Bureau's filing procedures including
information Concerning our indexing system, list of classifications used

in FBI filing system, and a set of Gia used by the Bureau. (Attached 15%

f th dum .)
is a copy of the memorandum. gw REC 8 (pa [lee %7

It was pointed out regarding this request to senior staff
member of the SSC, Mark Gitenstein, that some aspects of this request
appear to be outside of the scope of the Committee's authanity esse"
forth in Senate Resolution 21. Gitenstéin explained that while this ma ay |

Encl w may 19 197 ?
nclosure °
1-Mr. Adams - Enc. 1- Mr. Walsh - eet
1 - Mr. Bassett - Enc. 1 -Mr. Wannall - Enc.

1 - Mr. Cleveland - Enc. 1 - Mr. Mintz - Enc.

1 -Mr. Decker - Enc. 1-Mr. Cregar - Enc.

1 -Mr. Gebhardt - Enc. 1 -Mr. Hotis - Enc. \\

1 -Mr. McDermott - Enc. 1 -Mr. Daly - - Enc.

1 - Mr. Mooney - Enc. Al. REIS RSE RSSIEN

PVD:dkg (15) SO UED - OVER |
| Mm sad

a


6 en |

Legal Counsel to Adams Memorandum
RE: SENSTUDY 75

be technically accurate the Committee felt it was necessary for them

to come to a general understanding as to Bureau operations and that

this would assist them in their review of FBI operations in the domestic
and foreign intelligence areas. Gitenstein also indicated it was the
Committee's feeling that Senate Resolution 21 was intended to be construed
liberally and that in general it required that the SSC be furnished by

the various intelligence agencies that information which would be necessary
‘for them to carry out its mandate. It was also explained to Gitenstein

that concerning their requests involving prior changes in various sections
of the Manual of Instructions that they had not placed a cutoff date as

to how far back the Bureau had to go to comply with this request. Gitenstein
indicated that we could use 1-1-60 as the cutoff date.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

(1) Recipients review requests pertaining to their Divisions
and furnish in memorandum form their response to the Legal Counsel
Division.

(2) The Legal Counsel Division will, upon receipt of
responses from the interested Divisions, prepare the necessary communication
to the Senate Select Committee to be approved by the Attorney General and

furnished to the Committee.
an
a

pi? A

NW 88296 Dochd:37969588 Page 256


Soo et r) , ‘ @ (FAOS-~-4/30/75)

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY ATTORNEY _
GENERAL TYLER AND DIRECTOR KELLY

April 30, 1975

i - This memorandum concerns paragraph IV of the attachment

|
to Senator Church's letter of March 19 to the Attorney General.

|
On behalf of the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental

1
|

Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, I would like to
i

a

request the following: \

1. ‘Superseded Sections of the Mantial of Instructions.
Cértain sections of the Manual currently in effect have been produced
+6 us. We had intended by the request to ask for the relevant super-
séded sections (note the absence of the word "current" in Section IV
as compared to Section IIIA) and we did indicate previously to the
liaison staff that we were interested in superseded sections. But
without regard to that, it is clear from documents such as the
Director's letter of August 7, 1973 to the Attorney General that

| :
certain superseded sections will be highly relevant in analyzing

| .
the question of legal authority, as well as in understanding particu-

ar events in earlier years. We would appreciate their being sent

\ bs. .
ys i yt to us promptly or if that causes mechanical problems, being able to
:
ye ya r promptly review them at the FBI in order to select particular
f

oo yhth portions for copying. At a minimum we would be interested in
yw?

ge superseded Manual provisions for the sections set out in Appendix A.

,
cf ,
i k, Wey wer Mowat fd How Cart

LES els AS

HEROS 2a . -
HEREIN IS SUNG Anse TAINED , I. a fh EF a
DATE. Is IF f f

BY wet osURE

, NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 257


é a Se

Cv
Fy
.
a
a
eS PR eens cee

i 2. Sections of ‘the Manual of Instructions Not Previously
proauced, Based upon the previous production to us of the table

|

off contents to the Manual of Instructions, we have identified

certain additional sections of the Manual which we would like to
clenine. Rather than having these made available to us in the
first instance in our offices, we suggest that they be made avail-
' he to Mark Gitenstein, and other designated members of the staff,
for initial exaiiination at the FBI offices. A listing of those
sections is annexed as Appendix B.
- 3. Manual of Rules and Regulations. Again, based upon

4

|

j the procedure whereby we were first furnished with the table of

|

j eéntents of the Manual of Rules, we have identified those sections
j q

which we want to examine initially. To expedite matters, these

séctions, identified in Appendix C, could be examined by Mr. Gitenstein,

or other designated staff members, at the FBI offices.

bo , { 4. Piling System. It would also be most helpful if you
|

eould provide the Committee with any other written materials on

. administration of any of the filing or information systems, manual

‘ ‘oF automated, which are used in the course of intelligence or

" .
“4 iternal security activities. This does not fit within our prior
‘ |

request, but should serve to make future requests more focused.

“I have in mind specifically any memoranda prepared by

the Bureau on its indexing system and the so-called Clerk's Manual,

fe

~

NM ,
NW 88296 Docid:32989588 Page 258


wee eae

NW 85296 Docld:32989586 Page 259

if such a document exists, Please also proyide the Committee with

a list of the classifications used in the FBI's filing system as well

as a complete set of printed forms used by the Bureau '(é.¢., FD~165 ,

ete.).

We believe that all the foregoing material will help

expedite and facus the inquiry. I assume that Mr. Hotis will

contact me promptly to arrange for our review of this mateyal.

Pelif fa.

Frederick A. 0. Schwarz, Jr.,
Chief Counsel,
Senate Select Committee to
Study Governmental Operations
With Respect to Intelligence
Activities


Section

36
84
86
87

88
95

oT
105

ee en Ue ee te ae enna oe

i LOT

122

' 130

NW 68296 Docid:32989588 Page 260

Appendix A ’

Subject
Espionage
Registration Act
Sabotage

Investigations of Subversive Organizations
and Individuals

Sedition

Treason

Voorhis Act

Internal Security - Nationalistic Tendency

Internal Security Informants and Confidential
Sources; and Foreign Counterintelligence Assets

Extremist Matters and Civil Unrest

Extremist Tnformants and Sources


Section
4
8R
19

23

2T
28
29
15
78

ne en oh tithe - Stee ek ome ime ornate ines temaanteaie tment

90

Loe

103
‘ 134
‘ . 136
i ah
W6

f

™ NW-88296 Dochd:32989588 Page 261

Annendtx B

Subject

Surveillances and Raids

Data Processing Section, Computer Systems Division
Applicant and Employee Investigations Conducted

for Other Agencies

Bomb Threats
Explosives and Incendiary Devices

Civil Rights

Civil Rights Act of 1964

Conspiracy

Neutrality Matters

Passports and Visas

Selective Service Act

Coordination with Other Government Agencies

Foreign Police Cooperation

Assaulting the President of the United States and
Threats to the President of the United States

Antiriot Laws
Police Killings

Protection of Foreign Officials and Official Guests
of the United States


Part I
Section 9
Part IT

Section 1

a en ae ee me

Section 2
Section 3

Section }

aecteernnamaning eacenpee, im yan eee

Section 5
Section 6
, Section 7
_ Section 8

Section 9

Appendix C

Disciplinary Matters

Authority--Training--Submission of Information

Supervision--Availability-Resident Agencies
Administration of Offices

Communications \

.
ww

| Dissemination of Information

Publications, Press, and Public Contacts
7

Payments--Property

Miscellaneous Regulations

Classification--Character--Copies--Abbreviations


4-812 (Rev. 12-11-73) ~ , *
t ‘

Date of Mail __ 4/30/75

Has been removed and placed in the Special File Room of Records Section.

aRATION CONTAINED
See File 66-2554-7530 for authority. Hersh we oe

Subject JUNE MAIL SENSTUDY '75

Removed By % OMAY 28 1975

File Number _aet16305-

Permanent Serial Charge Out

poJ/ FBI

\ NW 86296 Docid:327989568 Page 263

«

FROM

4
/s SUBJECT:

STIONAL FGIM NO, FO

“1+ Mr. Adams

wt .
NL any

iB afza noah suedse8 Page 264

4 19G2 EDITION
1, REG, NO, 27

Assoc. Dir,
Dep. AD Adm: _
Dep. AD Inv. 2%

Asst. Dir: .

Admin.

Comp. Syst. —2_

Ext, Affairs __

Files & Com. —

Gen. Inv.

ident.

Inapection —

Intell 7S

Labo aie ny
ay ae
Eval somal

Sree Inv.

Memorandum

. Mr. J. B, Adams

: Legal comsel I ee oe!

. iz Ais Ly: A i eCeat Sef hand nfemernennn
H.R. 214; LEGISLATION TO HEQUIRE :
COURT ORDERS FOR THE INTERCEPTION
OF COMMUNICATIONS BY ELECTRONIC £
AND OTHER DEVICES, FOR ENTERING i

RESIDENCES, FOR OPENING MAIL, AND FOR
INSPECTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS

Training
Telephone Rm. 4
Director Sec'y —s

N
\

Reference Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams memorandum,
4-28-75, reporting that the Subcommittee on Postal Facilities, Mail, and
Labor Management, House Post Office and Civil Service Committee, is
going to open hearings concerning captioned bill on 5-6~75, and that the
Department of Justice will be requested to provide testimony.

Mike Cavanagh, Assistant on the Subcommittee staff,
called Inspector Bowers on 4-29-75 stating the Subcommittee Chairman,
Charles Wilson (D-Calif.), had instructed him to request a copy of the
Hoover report to the President in June, 1970, on behalf of the Committee
on Interagency Intelligence since this report contained information regarding
mail openings and possibly mail covers. Cavanagh was advised that we 33
have received prior requests from Congressional committees for this. 4 iy

»

G G-ALS P75

document and all such requests are being referred to the” White House. 4 eH

was told to contact James Wilderotter in the office of the Counsel- toxthe:

President at the White House. Wilderotter is the individual to whom w a

have previously referred a similar request for this pocyme ent Y HES, ihe a

Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities. 9 29
NOT RECORDED

Charles Whitley, Administrative Assistaniilo Siongmessman
David Henderson (D-N,C.), Chairman of the House Committee on Post Office
and Civil Service, on 4-30-75 told Bowers that the Postaf Facilities
Subcommittee had scheduled the hearings regarding this legislation nation |
after it was determined that the Subcommittee on Government Information
and Individual Rights, Committee on Government Operations, chaired by
Aver. White p

1
1 - Mr. Cleveland REC- 15 bE- Asbo ooiea bby er Walsh
1- Myr. Gebhardt - ommnae Hees Groen Mints

1- Mr. Wannall Yee ye
™ ‘sth ss Jun 1017s MB Bowers 7 =

DB:kjs (20) bios” CONTINUED over 4.
~ ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED WR
HEREIN Ie GPASSIE
DATE

ay
4

“Suey gues. Toriainat FED BY


Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams
RE: H. R. 214

Congresswoman Bella Abzug (D-N,Y.), had indicated an interest in
holding hearings onthis matter. Whitley stated hopefully Abzug's
Subcommittee can be precluded from conducting any hearings in this
area by virtue of the assertion of authority by the Post Office and Civil
Service Committee.

James Wentzel, Office of Legislative Affairs, Department
of Justice, has been alerted to the effect that an invitation will be received
by the Department for testimony on this legislation.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the General and Special Investigative Divisions and ~
the Intelligence Division promptly begin compiling appropriate information
for submission to the Legal Counsel Division which can be submitted to
the Department for its use in testifying or can be used as the basis for

FBI testimony should the Department request an FBI representative to appear
at these hearings.

Qe | gist Sod y .
pt 7 Oe

NW 88296 Docid:32989588 “Page 265


Assoc. Dir.

- Mr. J. B. Adams Dep. AD Adm. —

1

1 - Mr. J. A. Mintz: Dep. AD Inv.
Memorandum Pome ge eee aa

1

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 é 5010106
MAY 1962 EDITION ‘

GSO.GEN, REG No. 27 ~%

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Admin.
- Mr. W. V. Cleveland comp. syst.

— .
| Me. W. R. Wannaryowl7-— DATE: 4/29/75 Files 8 Com
| 1 - Mr. E. W. Walsh’ Gen, tv.
nb 1 - Mc. W. R. Wannall agpentio .
FROM : W, 0} JyFegar 1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar we Ft.
. ,aboratory

SUBJECT { SENSTUDY 75
ed

Wy

Plan. & Eval. —

Director Sec’y __

This memorandum records the recei
documents furnished to the Bureau~as a member of the Ad Hoc
Coordinating Group for Congressional Review of the Intelligence
Community. These documents were furnished by Mr. John M.
Clarke, Associate Deputy to the Director of Central Intelligence
for the Intelligence Community, who is chairman of the Ad Hoc

Group. vy Ay

Attached herewith is a current list of those staff
members. of the Senate Select Committee who have received
security clearances. The Bureau will continue to receive
up-dated lists” as“additional staff members are afforded a
security clearance.

Also attached is a copy of the request levied on
the Department.of State by the Senate Select Committee. A copy

of this request was se ke... for its information
by Mr. Clarke. REAM CATION CONTAINED

: HEREIN IG UNCLASSIFH

ACTION: . DATE 22D). py ALM eds)
For information and record purposes. ta

Enclosures - pe! Lp

WOC:1mh Im h
(8):

\
; G1 MAY151975 |

4 eae .

\nt

8 4 MAY 2 "7 1975
NW

296 Docid:32989588 Page 266


B*

B * Fenn, Peter \ 24/4/

24

|April. 1975

Staff Members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities who
have received a security investigation by the Federal Bureau of .

Investigation within the past five years and are certified as meeting

requirements of EO 10450 for access to classified information up to.

and including TOP SECRET

NAME

Aaron, David 15/7

Bader, William 7 7/¥

Baron, Frederick

Beng, Charity I.

Brooks, Nancy
Carter, Barry 24/4

Chesnik, Barbara

Davis, Lynn

174

Dawson, Thomas

De Oreo, Mary
Dillon, Molly
Dwyer, Daniel

Gitenstein, Mark Henry

’ Epstein, Michael Taylor

Greissing, Edward

Hatry, Audrey Helen

_Inderfurth, Mark

Johnson, Dorothy

“pms aus nya _

- DATE "& PLACE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NO.

8-21-38
98-31
122-47
7-23-46
2-14-40.

12-14-42.

4-18-46
9-6-43
9-9-52
6-13-47
4-16-51.
8-24-52

"3-10-37

J 2-12-47
37-46

43-27-50
6-10-23

9-29-46

6-8-25

‘
Ih

No

CONN

WI.

Germany

NC

OR

550-44-7971

545-30-3377

494-54-524]1. *

05338-7410
313-38-6773

567-56-8854

390-46-2235

o

042-36-9155

AT1-60-1688
287~42-6258
150-383-4588
023-44-8792
026-28-6318
213-50-1123
"420-60-8767
29650-4113
216~14~8691
245-724-5617
540~20-6413

TF - Badge

|

py = Badge

we

Wides, Burton Victor /7/¥ 6-14-41

* Staff Members who are designated to receive COMPARIMENFED INFORMATION.

'B gtafé Members briefed on COMPARIMENTED INFORMATION.

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 268. -

Staff Members of Senate Select Committee cleared, page 2

Nave _ DATE § PIACE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURETY NO.

Johnson, Loch 2-21-42 New 566~62-0478
. Zealand

= Kieves, Lawrence 1-4-48 NY 068~38-6464
‘*® Kirbow, Charles 2 7/7 10-2-22 GA 252-12-5112
* Tombard, Charles 24/4 \ 6=2-30 FR 578-44-9471
Laebengdod, “Howard 12-29-42 IN 30744-9707
~ MacDonald, Naldeen 10-19-51 Brazil 25-78-8708
B * Madigan, Michael James /</7 4-18-43 pe 042~-34-3797
B* Marshall, Benjamin /7// 5-A~19 NE 485~28-4503
B * Maxwell, Elliot Everett /// 7-24-46 NY 133-34-4225
* Mecham, Martha Evans 2-11-40 CAL. 528~48-6848
Be Miller, Williamc. 1/4 8-15-31 NY 09-26-4349
| B* O'Flaherty, James Daniel st 1-46-42 TLL 239-602-8495
 @glo£f, Jan oy W-14-47 CAL 558-~74-8394
Peterson, John F. 6-15-41 CAL 565~56~7707
Pitts, Susan “10-24-53 Canada —(020-40-7638
B* Romberg, Alan 22/7 12-1-38 wy «(10730-8583
B* §chwarz, Frederick A.0., TIT /*//4~20-35 NY 08430-2047
B# Shea, Patrick /x// 2-28-48 ur 528~64-1965
‘Smith, Stephanie 3-23-54 OH 282-58- 6476
B ¥ nider, Lewis Brittle 27/y 1-12-45 Nc 246~72-0956
fewell, Mary . - AH25-44 | TN 566~64-7628
BY NT 139~30-1936

TF - Badge

TF ~- Badge

TF - Badge

_—

baage

ae : Re equest to try: Secretary of Stete for Docu’ PS and /
\ Other Materia al Regarding the Devartment of Svate and

on
Intelligence Activities of the United States Government

\

2. ALL ai ectives, regulations, memoranda, guidance or similar
material setting forth the relationship.of the Department of State
to, and its role in, the Intelligence Community and the National
Security Council structure, including but not limited to the United
States Intelligence Board, the Forty Committee, Washington Special.’
Action Group, Senior Review Group, the Verification Panel, and the -
Intelligence Committee. Specific descriptive and documentary material ¢
covering the nature and extent of the Department's relationship with
the National Security Agency and-the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and other investigating and intelligence entities shovld be included,

- such as the Interagency Evaluation Committee. . eee

2. Organization charts shoving which officials represent ‘the
Department of State on the various Intelligence Community and NSC
committees, and on all other bodies, including subcommittees, whose

_ functions include intelligence activities. Such charts should give
the names and titles of officials representing + he. Department of
State in those committees (or their predecessor organizations) going
as far back as 1947 or any earlier dete which the Department believes
retevank, The charts should also include. for the same time frame, . ;
the nemes, titles, and a brief job descrintion of those officials of) -)
the Department who provided staff support to the Department's ; .
‘representatives on Intelligence Community and NSC committees: or to ~
the committees directly. : .

; . 33 ALL ‘regulations, ‘guidance, inter-agency menorenda, delimite-
-* tions agreements, including other agreements and similar material -
governing’ the support which the Department of State provides to or
receives from other agencies within the Government, having an intelli-
gence or security or investigative function. This would include,
i - but not be limited to, such matters as administrative support and .
- “eover" provided to employees of the Central Intelligence Agency,
the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Drug Enforcement Adminis~
_ tration (and its predecessors), communications SUpPOt » and financial
- services. - tee, oo ots :
a - hh. ‘Description, including organization chart, of the Bureau of
Intelligence and Research (INR). This should include, in particular,
- - detailed discussion of the operations of the Directorate for
. Coordination (INR/DDC) and any predecessor offices, whether in INR,
the Under Secretary's office, or elsewhere in the Department. ‘Names -
“~~ of personned throughout the Directorate for Coordination or its. .

- LLIN =ORMani CONTAINED ;
ERE VL a CASS Lo
| DATE DOL , BS ’

02 Leg —|N
. NW 88296 Dochd:32989588 Page 269 cs ; St

programs, paramilitary programs, and counterintelligence activities,

; categories ‘where differences exist.

.

NW 88296 Docld:32989588 Page 270°-- .

‘tive agent or entity in the country to which the Ambassador or Chief

ee f - .
predééessc.c should beNiisted covering the entire per¥id since that .
m wes developed .

L

5. Description of the’ organiza ation.and functions of the
Bureau of. Security and Consular Affairs, and of the Office of Security
within the Bureau of :Administration, insofar as they relate to liaison
or cooperation with any intelligence or domestic investigatory body.

6. All instructions, memoranda or similar documents authorizing
the establishment of and detailing the mandate of the Cabinet Committee -
to Combat Terrorism (and its Working Group). Also all reports on
terrorism by the Cabinet Committee to Combat Terrorism (and its Working
Group), such as the report by the Secretary of State to the President
referred to in the President's Memorandum of September 25, 1972,
establishing the Committee...

%. ALL ‘directives, regulations, memoranda, guidance, or similar
material which sets forth the Department of State's role in establishing
or reviewing requirements or proposals for intelligence activity,
ancluding intelligence collection, recruitment of egents, political
action programs, paramilitary programs, and counterintelligence
activities. In addition, a descriptive account of the Department of

tate's role in establishing or reviewing requirenénts or proposals
for intelligence activity, differentiating the Department's role in

Takei genne enllection. reerwitrmont of acermte. nekitties! action
ty copes hid

aie een ee gp re ee ee ROLLON

This should include differentiati on ‘between activities within these

8. ALL directives, regulations, memoranda, guidance, or similar
material which sets forth the role and functions of the Depertment
of State in the collection, assessment, production, and dissemination
of national intelligence. \1In addition, a descriptive account of the -
current role and functions of the Department of State in this regard.

9. All instructions, guidance or similar material defining the
authority of U.S. Ambassadors and other Chiefs of Mission to know
about and -control activities of any U.S. intelligence or investiga-

of Mission is accredited. This should include any limitations upon
Ambassadorial control or cognizance of and discussion of any other
coordination, monitoring, or other relationships between U.S. missions
and the activities of any U.S. intelligence or investigative agent
or- entity.

10. Any other historical, descriptive or documentary material,
studies or reports which the Department believes would be of assistance
to the Select Committee in understanding the Department's role in
intelligence activities, evaluation and monitoring of those activities,
or other matters relevant to the Committee's mandate. ~ ©

ry

‘
‘
Ae AE ERNE HOO EERIE METIS STIS ea mmm arte Pm Nata de or RTT,

-

