yq,2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |

* a foe wee a ee a

‘ _. + TOP SECRET

1. Attached is Annex A of the Top Secret study
entitled, The Examination of the Bona Fides of a KGB
Defector - Yuriy I. NOSENKO dated February 1968 (copy 10).

Copy 10 of this study had been forwarded to you earlier

for your review.

2. Certain portions of Annex A of this study are é
: deleted since it contains information which bears on the
security of ongoing, viable CIA operations, or is related

thereto. }

3. We request return of the study (copy 10) and Annex A. '

: when your review has been completed.

Attachment: As Stated Above

WARNING NOTICE - SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE “SOURCES AND METHODS
INVOLVED

E2 IMPDET CL BY 011340

2 mse dremnbd eh SR a SRR PSE RAR HST MAAR atin cat AT wr NaN azetinee ose

7 ESS AI aenenran amenrnioan eterna RRL esa ERI RINGS ay Ste ADin a et ah

jen amaaetiatey, G4 bet iene ane sine


14-0000

. iG a

10 February 1964

as saying it was presumed that NOSENKO had defected. coerce ee te im =

>
3
3
*
[>
’

Soviet O£ffictals

dbouc, NOSENKO

if

February 1564 a . - .
NOSENKO defected Ln Geneva.

& February 1964

The Chief of che Soviet Disarmament Delegation notified
the Soviet Ambassador in Bern shortly before noon that
NOSENKO had disappeared, correctly placing the date as
4 February. They speculated privately between therselves

that he might have been “poisoned” or injured in an auto-
mobile accident. ,

a
4
‘a
4

ae

aba coi csul

& February 1964

1

An official spokesman of the Soviet Mission in Geneva
reported to the Swiss police that NOSENKO, an “expert

temporarily assigned to Geneva", had been missing for four : : ‘Bo
days.

be

ashe oe

ro

3 February 196

Evening news broadcasts in Geneva carried reports

attributed to both Soviet and Swiss sources that KOSENKO
had disappeared.

+ bhatt Bel hte errors

The Swiss press quoted unidentified Soviet sources

>


Top Secret

(Annex A)

10 February 1964 (cont Laued)

A U.S. Department of State press release was {ssued
tdentifying NOSENKU as KGS off{cer and acknowledging his
request for political asylum iu the United States.

long tenure in the KGB, KOSENKO would have a great deal of
important information which he could inpart to intelligence
agencies of other countries. Certainly, he would be
acquainted with many KCR empluyees and could identify them.
He alse would be intimately acquainted with a large number
of Soviet agents working inside the USSR against American
and British nationals.

According t toa sensitive source,

beers ng lie bulk of XOSENKO' xnowledge coacerning
KGB activities would revolve around the intelligence .
operations of the KGB in Moscow and also KGB personalities
working in Headquarters. NOSENKO was also undoubtedly
familiar vith all KC8 personalities in Geneva and certainly
knew some KGB personalities in other countries.

Comment: NOSENKO identified a number of KGB officers in
. Geneva; he asserted that some othere,.. known
by CIA to be connected with the KGB, were not.

362.

Top Secret

lot ere a imiamemccemmmrace manredal semen eres


14-0000 -

Top. Secret:

(Annex A)

AQ February 1964 (continued)
Accordi 2 toa sensitive source

"O Was

E : affiliated vith the KGB for
: approximately sixteen years, since about 1947, end was an
ia employee cf the Second Chief Directorate in Moscow, His
_™ father, now dead, was a Deputy to the Prime Minister of the

Soviet Union and also Minister of the Shipbuilding Industry.

There ts a shipyard uaned after NOSEN“KO's father in the.
Ukraine.

Comment: NOSENKU claims to have served

in the GRU untii
1953, when he entered the kG

B.

According to a sensitive source,

c 3 - several KGS
It appeared quite certain to ee

officers that NOSENKO had the rank of lieutenant colonel in the KG3.

se

Comment: .NOSENKO was ac the time claiming to have been.

a KGd ileutrenane colonel.

According to a sensitive source,
A from KGB officers

newspapers fa not that of
sores wit th NOSENKO for several years
in KGB eatquarters; he described NOSENKO as a person who
likes to be fashionably dressed at all times and is fond

of women, by nature a friendly individual and generally

well-liked by his fellow workers. NOSENKO worked in the
Second Chief Directorate.

RS ty tae nee oh

the

Fo nar oe ee tpe btpe oh,


(Annex Aj
20 February 1964 (continued)

°
5 -

Comment:

ee 2 mp ae EE es
+ ‘The photograph accompanying Americen
and Swiss prese accounts of NOSENKO's defection
was by error not that of NOSENKO but’ of

a sensitive source Vladimir SHUSTIOV, whon*@3GkM and NOSENXO both

identified as a "clean" Soviet diplomat at the
Geneva Disarmament Conference.

Noting the publicity accompanying che defection of KG3
officer NOSENKO in Switzerland, UGOLITSYN recalled that
NOSENKO had been a Second Chief Directorate ecfficer working
against American citizens.

Comment: Routinely, GOLITSYN had reviewed in March 1962
(before NOSENKO contacted CIA) a list of
. Soviet delegates co the Disarmament Conference.
, NOSENKO's .name,. which was on the list, did not
. at that time prompt any comment from GOLITSYN.

Al February 1964

Ambassador DOSRYNIN informally notified the Department
of State that a Soviet note would be delivered later to ask
how NOSENKO had left Switzerland, to request hie release,
and to demand an immediate interview with him.

12 February 1964

S.K. TSARAPKIN, the head of the Soviet Delegation to the
Disarmament Conference, read a statecent at a press conference’
in which he strongly condemned the Swias authorities for
permitting NOSENKO's "kidnapping" and for hindering efforts
to locate him. TSARAPKIN demanded that immediate eteps be
taken to return NOSENKO to Soviet custody, = - .

366 OC _ _

“Top Secret

Docatis Sine par eeiabe w pesnenee

Copy

ip DURE SEU a iat feb Rishon opel NAN ie OR Cte

TS No. 197124

tae ladaadaiverba Shlee Tiled

vast al

ead als ten ee

i
y
\

oo


14-0000

(Annex A)

12 February 1964 (continued)

g At simultaneous Press conferences in Sern and Geneva, the
Swiss rejected these accusations. of non-cooperacion and aoted
the Soviet delay fn advist.z the police of NOSENKO’e disapsea~-

vance and Soviet ratfiure to cooperate with Swiss authoricies
in locating NOSENKO

The Soviet note earller ‘promised. by DOBRYNIN was delivere:
a to.the State Departnmint. A noncemmittal reply was given to
Soviet queries concerning the requested interview and the
means of NOSENKO's Jjeparture from Switzerland.

2) . os The Swiss Embassy asked for a meeting with NOSENKO in
order to obtain assurance that the defection had been
veluntary. Arrau;euents were made to have NOSENKO meet with

iB Swiss and Soviet representatives in Wishington as goon as

7 possible.
g OSENKO arrived in Washington at 2130 hours.

‘ 32-13 February 1964

2: :
i

RIATR Le
: remeron tas RUA Tor
i ea, ES Se

14 February 1964 : ft
“In Moscow, Soviet Foreign Minister GROMYKO read to
Anbassador KOHLER a statement deploring the "evasive" reply
of the State Departuent to Soviet inquiries in Washington
and terming the whole event of NOSENKO's disappearance &

365

Top Secrat_

values eee naaienital Bales preteen! one ae

a hie

vere

Sree end

fe
Fe
a
:

it Tee


14-0000

ee Top Secret

+. :

: (Annex A) : a

1s February 1964 (cont inued)

“pross provocaticu by American lucelligence organs”
GhOMYKO repeated the ccmand for NOSENKO's ammediate release — ‘ -
from American custody.

‘tne Counselor of the Swiss Embassy interviewed NOSENKO et

the washington offices of the U.S. [mmigration and Natural{j-

zation Service. Tie Seviet confrontation tnmediately after- ‘
wards was handled by Minister Counselor G.M. KORNIENKO, and

Third Secretary’ V.F. FSAROV, a recent arrival in'Washington.

NOSENKO told both the swiss aed the Soviets that he had !
defected of his own free will after careful consideration i :
-and that he had no desire to retura to the Scvier Union. In ;
response to KORNIENKO's questions, he specifically renounced
his status and rights as a Soviet citizen.

we

ca

wait

rc 4 t . i 4

18 February 1964 i !

oo : Feliks KOVALEV, a Soviet diplomat in Buenos Atfres, told “4
a CIA agent that he had actended the Institute of Inter- 8

national Relations with NOSENKO. According co KOVALEV,

NOSENKO had twice married, had a good family background, . ‘

was the son of a Minister in the Government, was notorious

for his “adventurous” nature, and "famous for his character”. |
}
i

vi s

Seater OES

Aint CEs -

Sates eed meats


14-0000

amigo

: : Rea ae ee oe eye

ff&anexn At

y

rh

Jue

be rebate sete

a
4
4 Ee
22 Stes SRE
4 2a. F _ a
ce ee ete er ean cee AEE oe
Gaon Seed Se er
ees wee ae .
oe Loos
, Sa a atts
e 3, Te ee Be 2 A :

sasha See eae
Site aT Lae :

- 367

Pl Mlle!


14-0000

Top Sesret

ie
isis!

‘
aes

a]
z

ass Mertechte a eee ae
oS TR AU ad a

7 Tel PRES Si TRAE PRY VE Ra ID ey ME “EY PPD
ene, EPCS UHE y em Foe ated ae TAR £000 SSA TER ET § SIRE KES eae,
i READ. Gratis Newer ‘AUER _

OF PEAT 38. ee ELAeHL CRON oa SO asa NE A SP
$3, SO ER PSE ee RT Eee ats apres eey
SOMATIC SEE | ENG Be CR a EA SS PEERS LOIS LD AS ED
LSE LEERY TTT STE) GPE yh Gk EE . tae
eS EEA Caste SRE SC LS EGA Ba SOS
: PES RNP OT OTE BUY fT PE
RINT ae PI Ls aa Ser Tern Fe 2S ea

seth both ad e GSU mee

Aaa eld AOE talent ve

_ ee 2S MALS HCHO
EE 2 ATER ASE Yl AT RS A

TAMER MPR Ged

14.0000 +

a SihLO had been {n the second Chief Directorate
for about 14 years and was acquainted with almoet all of the
employees cf this directorate. He was awere of the structure
of the KGB and knows many personne} of the Firet Chief
Directorate. AYEES ¥ OF EEE

iat : NOSENKO, as Deputy to the Chief
Seventh Department, had in his possession a telephone
directery which iisted the names of sone.10,000 KGB employees .
in Moscow. Only Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs of Departments, h, :
these phone books. GASES REBT TAS expressed pee a Nth officer
opinicn that "NOSENKO is much more vaiuable to the FBI and
CIA than was Oleg PENKOVSKIY because of che fact that he
knows seo auch about the methods of work of the First and
Second Directorates of the KGS and is familiar with so many
individuals in the KGB both in Moscow and abroad. e@gitizagm>a KGB office
CARBUS said that PLNEOVSKIY was able to furnish American and
British Intelligence with a lot of information concerning -
defense secrets of the Soviet Union, but NOSENKO is much
more Knowledgeable ia Latelligence and counterintelligence
operations of the KGB."

Comment: NOSENKO has never commented on the KGB ;
telephone book referred © above.

Iya ag TNE eB etka

14-00800

Cade DST RESLEE 0 Bi ERUEPY RAREST EON BES SUP . i
SL SO ERE RS FcR BREE. BRE MESO . - |

wht "E

aes

sa Seats MALT Ra RT Iris OR ene
SOROS: AAD TEASE SAM AAC GLAS CLL ATEN
52: ORATOR BRU 8 SES SET SR ey a Sey eanse
epen yunarcarunainuems Wana sreainee t ee? :
are PEN ar

V5

Milanese

?
i.
4
|

Pa,
ane

’
~ ae
7 toe . - os - ot
: 4
- ‘ }
. e'
as troy
a wy
- . tot hos

wasabi 2


14-0000...

” According to a sensitive source,

. , . 5 ‘

in @ resporse 60 a question > | - " Se

whether W°SEI“O actually cefected or whether @@eBe the defection might be a _ . x, :

KG "trick", tha source replied fhat fron his own knowledze‘of this matter,

’
he was convinced that U°SEix0's defection was rot a "trick" by the KGB,

22 February 1964 oe .

. : . *

According to a sensitive source fron conversations with verdois unnamed KGB 8
officers: NOCENKO worked ezainst personnel

wecrrtonmevenewten wah wont ie . Se 3

. stationed at : erisan Srl in Soveew, and with his +

help agents were veloped among these Americans. [t is ; . 3

: assumed by the KGO that he is familiar with the number and 4

locatior of microvacnes cn che Tmoassy. - a

4

i

Comment: Alct gh NOSENKO knew that there were micro-
pheness in three seneral locations in the
Emdain,+, his specafie daformacion regarding
the number and location of microphones was
lisited co that contained in a written lise
brousht to Geneva in 1964, a List which he
claimed no one in the KGB knew he had,

24 February 1964

Women clainiag .o be the wife and mother of NOSENKO
, visited the american imbassy tu Moscow for the first tise,
"expressing disbelief that he had voluntarily betrayed his
family and country ound requesting a perseunal meeting vith
him.

WEP sr eee pitdeg yates mt Ee Bo Tan aihe espe ieee rae

*

Wey

rs . re :
TS. No. 197124
Copy - 0 2ey :

RRO ER EIR LENE ANS ho Nee cent sre AEs nA sneer ee en eee ee eee pine
‘
.
7


14.90000

AAS ALA I Ue Na EAL RB et

;
zg
z
4
&
3

“24 Fepruary 196% (continuad) Se

5: A AAD REA SPH A TE OTE PNET I A TAN

(Annex A) . ve one

Comment? NOSENSO coafivmed thetr identities as hie wife

und mothe: on the basis of physical deacrip-
tions. On only one previcuse occasion have
menbers of a defector's family called on a
foreign embassy in Moscow. © Following the
defection of Yuriy Vasilyevich KROTKOV in
England in 1963, his wife appeared at the
British Frbassy to make inquiries about hin.

5 EON Sarat : ® KUROCHKIN (fnu),
a KGB séf officer scheculed for assizgament to Washington,
will not be sent us he is "well-known" to NOSENKO. In the

‘course of-his duties in Moscow, KUROCHKIN had very often

visited the department where NOSENKO worked and, as a

result, NOSENKO is “more than casually acquainted with him".

Comment: NOSENKO has never identified KUROCHKIN nor
referred to the name. :

* 1S No 1

a

nme

Gre

es seach epee Anka nan amacrine secsnnee eee Serene

Fobruary 36964

Nikolay ARTAMON 30V, who defected from the Soviet Navy in
the late 195i's, noted the publicity accompanying KOSENKO' 3
defection. He volunteered to CIA that he attended a naval
preparatory school wita che son of Minister NOSENKO in
1944-1946.

Comment: ARTAMONOV's description of the school and of
the dates involved differs from those. elaindd
by NOSENKO.

KGB officer Vladimir TULAYEV mentioned NOSENKO to a
CIA double agent in Vienna. TULAYEV said that NOSENKO,
whom he knew-well, cawe’ from a wonderful family, loved his
wife and children, and earned a good salary. (TULAYEV |
later said on. another occasion that. he had friends who
knew NOSENKO well.)

Comment: NOSENKO never identified TULAYEV by nane or
photopraph. When asked, NOSENKO denied
knowing him. : pone .

neo Sa

oo oO “1S No. 197124.

ne i

Top Secret

. apy Ao.

y
2

(BE gatos ate a Ateae ower 6 (oe

foo stage,

February-March 1964

A KG3 conmission

was in the proces: of studying “the ecale of loss" {caused

by NOSENKO's defection} to the USSR. The commission was

very iarge, forned fron different cerartments of the KGB.
The study (sic) was made “becauee ic ta supposed that
NOSEAKO had access to many rocket matters, to many nuclear
matters, to many strategical objects of the cuuntry...many
details about life of the Jeaders of the country, in the
governnent...that he knew very much sbout iaternal relations
‘between the people working in the KGB, that he had many

‘close friends among them and [spent] days and nighta

“together with them. The whole history. of his life was

studied step by step very carefully."

See PK Bed sees aa

's. S.No. nia

lata etters 2


14-0000

Oo

- gis : és : a
According to a sensitive. @ source, : . :
REE (from ccaveraations with varfous unnamed. KGB ~  ?
officers ' NCSENXS knows many ,

of the chtefs and ceputies of the XG® directorates and .
departrents at KGB iieadquarte:3 {tn Mosccew. In KGB Head- - :
quarters tiere ure four separate dining rooms for personnel
who work there; one. such dining room is reserved for chiefs
and deputies of departsents. Secause of thia fact, NOSENKO
has a vast knowledge of the hierarehy of the KGB.

i

Coument: NOSENKO never referred to the dining rooms
until che January-March 1965 tnterrogations, |

when he volunteered that he had eaten occasionally i

in the “chtefs' dining room”.

- ¥8'No, 197124
penal nee

hae \


14-0000

o

SIE SSA SERIE ASN SDR SOE

:
a
i
4
£

mb team -

a

2 BR EO RULES aca SAAT
we ; eee EELS GE armLES UAE Ld eat SATE SAGE VETS De ESTO
aoe <SPAN TA ARAL AES PRE AS AS TUT TENS WE AE

23- March 1964 a en ; oF

The tvo women claining to be the wife and mother of :
NOSENKO made the last of five visits to the Embassy in
Moscow. NOSENKO's wife had explained that she required
some definite statement in writing from ner husband so that
she could plen for her own future and that of tne NOSENKO
children.

A
A

Fa Sere

14-0000

a
i
i
i
i
i
;
3
Hy
i

eae ose

SA SNARE any OLY GRR TH RICE INE ct IMR AR PD

(Annex A)

27 March 1964
According to a sensitive source

See (fron various unnamed KGB officers & Era
@eGF: 3 fhere seems to be unaninous opinion among @BiS KGB
chiets cig > that NOSENKO...could do the KCB a tre-
wendous amount of harm. NOSENKO in his position as a de-
puty chief {: one of the departsents of che Second Chief
Directorate tould have been entitled to have one personnel
directory of approximately J0 pages setting for the iden-.
titfes: of all cf che supervisory officials in KGB Head-
quarters, N“GSENKU would also have had a .00-page directory
listing by naze and telephone number all the rank-and-file
employees working in Moscow. The opinion was expressed by
sone CikStew KGB “chiefs” & 5 te > that if NOSENKO
were merely able to make these two directories aveilable
to American Increlligence, the KGB would be severely damaged
for the present and for several years to come.

Comment: NOSENKO has never referred to the KGB direc-
tories described.

3 March 1964

KGB officers I.1. PETUKHOV nad P.P..BORISOV in Canada
told their agent George Herman SPRECHER to cease all intel-
ligence activity for a year, to destroy any incrininating
materials in his possession as well as to supply the Soviets
with passport photographs so that “escape” docunents could
be prepared for himself and his family. SPRECHER asked
whether the action had any connection with NOSENXO's recent-
ly publicized defection, but the KGB officers denied it,
asserting NOSENKO “was just a secretary"

FON Ren BO tee ty te ce ae arb ne

mt) No. 197124

Copy ane

‘certain -

Tey

ann

Weasel ad

‘

Breas


14-0000

(Annex A)

Bl March 1944

Cosment:

March 1964
According to 2a sensitiv

briefed in hi

(continued)

when PETUKHOV reconctacted SPRECHER in February
1965, PETUKHOV acknowledged that NOSENRO had
in fact heen the cause of KGB ec'ncern, that he
had had sume connection with NOSENRO, and
hOSENKO may have known something of what the
KGB was doing in Canade.

NOSENKO desceribed a KGB Illegal, whose name- -
was unknown to hia, who apperently is-identical... ~
to SPRECHER. ;

source

» was
3 office in KGB Headquarters by a Second Chief

Directurate officer of the American Departments Personnel
of that Deparcrent, in which NOSENKO hed served until hie
defection, were «9 shocked at the event that’ they would not
Menlicn it ae all.

. Comment:

a sensitive source
In this and other contexts has stated
or implied that NOSENKO served in the American 3
Department in 1963-1964: -NWOSENKO asserte he .
left the American Departwest in Jenuary 1962
and served in the Seventh Department until his

defection. rn . .

se dor heh ce

rere


14.00000

coat

a won er vd

te setae

nd

No. 197124
‘Copy 10

14-0000

: {Annex A)

- April-May 1964

FGR officer G.N. VLASOV, case officer of Robert Lee
JOHNSON in Paria, began to meet JOHNSCN on the street rather
than in varlous restaurants as had been thetr naabit. At one
of their final meetings before JOHNSON returned to’ the United
States, VLASGVY told JOHNSON that a Soviet Intelligence officer
had defected to the Awericans in Geneva, and that extreme
caution must therefore be exercised in JCHNSON's contacts
with the “GB. VLASOV said that the defector-could not identify
JOUNSON but that JGHNSON should dispoee of everything he had
which might link him to Soviet espionage activities. (See
p 24for a summary of the JOHNSON case.) .

eae Bt sais ;
Paes NTS ;

i Peer agit jig hae Pca et
2 ee ae ae rine fi oF Pip te Fees
ERE SUOUNYY SOE i NET EAT eHPE ee erie sang

TERS SES «bay 5e ne ieenrenna Ei me a FBS.

May 1964: According to a sensitive source
(from unidentified ocurces, presumably from KGB
officers eRe THESE ETRE): Two commissions have
been established by the crst" for the purposes: (a) to
Jdetermine why KGB employees auch as DERYABIN, GOLITSYRN,’
“ and NOSENKO defected while serving abroad, and (b) to attempt:
to eliminate the "weak" employees | and improve the effictency
/ of the KGB. .

pr,

ian BEE ta og

‘

ene eal Saas

wane rhe Freed tet te eames


14-0000

nee pnarumpnier opm er TE.

savtase 5 tint thao ia del aalies tepae tub ie "wii bee tbat Plamen <annpsidtaaddN SS (REPEL ene + |
ae ES REA Rat Sg APNE eat i RE TRIE LI ab aE eT aT CE OE

Eee ae cet oe

(Annex A) : : . - no _ ot

20 Mav lyos
According to a sensitive source from a‘ KGB officer
SEPES 2 eee prey — C a
<a Bee ie The KCB was Lusky thac the Avericans ‘found only i.
uicreshones fo the U.S. Embassy in Moscow. Actually, fs

about 260 microphones were concealed by the Soviets in the

hmoassy. “SOSLNKO waa respenelble for furnishing infornaacion

to the Anerfcans shich resulted in the microghones being :
found. NOSENKO knew only-the general locaticn of the 46
microphencs which were found and dees not have any knowledge

of the remaining ones,

12 June 1944. , :

Professor John M. THOMPSON reported at the American
Embassy in Moscow that an unnamed Soviet official with whon
he was acquainted told hin that NOSENKO waa a profligate
with two wives and many debts and is considered in Noscow

. to be somesne they are well rid of.

22 June 1964 id
According to a sensitive source : * : ON
9(fron various unnamed KGB. officersa t

sone . "
The consensus amongaKkGS employees &€ é i Si
1s that in the future’ the KGB will be feeling sharply the
effects of NOSENKO's escape to American Intelligence.
NOSENKO is considered to be vastly more important than either. iN
GOLITSYN or DERYABIN. This opinion appears to be based on:
Several factors: First, NOSENKO worked against personnel
Stationed-at the American Embassy in Moecow and with his help
®gents were developed among these Americans. Second, it fs...
assumed by KGB personnel that because of his closeness to:

14.90000

Top. Secret

oto: 22 Sane 1964 (sontinued) 7 _ : .

4 the American Es nbassy in the past, NOSENKO would also be
: familiar with the number of nlcrophones which had beea
i ‘{natalled in the Embassy by the KGB and the locations of
, these microphones. Third, as a Deputy Chief of a depart=
“ment, NOSENFO would normally have had access to a telephone
directory listing all personnel in all directorates of the
KGB in Moscow. Another factor, which is a forridable one
in the mines cf other KGB erployees, 1a that NOSENKO
travelled in a rather influential cirele of friends in
: Moscow who were high in the Soviet Government. All these
; “ comments were cited as reagons for ROSENKO being en iN
“inportant catch” for American Intelligence, but no one in . H
the KGB really knows exactly how auch information NOSENKO
-had concerning the KGB. . . i

9 June 1964

: . ° GOLITSYN (from personal acquaintance): NOSENKO, the son

4 of the former Minister of Shipbuilding, was a KGB officer

i who had worked in the American Department and the Seventh

5 Department of the Second Chief Directorate. GOLITSYN, while

; on his own First Chief Directorate buginess, met NOSENKO two.

or three times in the American Embassy Section in 1953, :

' and had seen hin occasionally at work during 1958 and 1959.
When GOLITSYN asked him where he was working in 1959, NOSENKO
replied that he was assigned to the Seventh Department.

“ NOSENKO served in the American Embassy Section from 1953 |

.until 1957 or 1958, and was specifically responsible for ; So
KGB coverage of American military personnel in Moscow during ; : } ee

i

amen teeretion eee

Sie

-1953. For the remainder of hie service in the Embaasy Section

‘until 1957 or 1958, NOSENKO may have had the same responsi-

‘bilities or may have been working againet other Embassy
personnel or correspondents, but he was definitely in the
American Department during the entire period. In 1957 or

1958 NOSENKO was transferred to the Seventh Department, and

was a senior case officer there as of 1959. NOSENKO did not
“work in the Arerican Department of the Second Chief Girectorate

American Department at any time during 1960; GOLITSYN visited

the Embassy Section on at least. three occasions from early
° 1960 to early 1961, and would have known if NOSENKO had been. .
in the Section, particularly {f NOSENKO had been Deputy Chief. . Jt ' Lot,
G.I. GRYAZNOV was acting as assistant of the Chief of the ot -
Section during this period. .

ne he ea

_: 382


_ Tep Secret
(annex A) . : 7 of a - ” a4

29 June 196% (continued)

Pe

‘ Comment: NOSENKO claims he-lefe the Embassy Section in
i. ae ‘ (1955 and was assigned to the Seventh Department
B . until 1960, when he returned to the Embassy
. Section as Deputy Chief. NOSENKO did not
o -identify COLITSYN's photograph and had denied °*
i since defection thet he has ever met or’ aven'
seen hin. : ‘

the

wets Tea BLE tate

‘

Line 1966
According to a ‘sensitive source

u ee ; x i 3
- = “Just after” HOSENKO's: | iy
defection V¥.S. MEDVEDEV from the Exita Commigsion of the : ;
a CPSU Central Committee travelled to Geneva to speak to the ~

Soviets stationed there and to Soviet delegates to the Disara- |

“ament Conference. MEDVEDEV underscored the seriousness of
the defecticn and urged greater vigilance against such acts.
The defection caused the recall of Nina Ivanovaa YEREMEYEVA,

, a KGB secretary in Geneva. It was rumored that some.séxty

£ Soviet officials stationed abroad would be transferred from

wenn ubewinnbates elamichates am

thetr assignment as a consequence of tha NOSENKO affair.
V.A. POCHANKIN, a KGB officer with the permanent Soviet
Mission in Geneva, speculated that he had been completely
fy exposed by NOSENKO and would therefore have to returo to
Moscow. Yu. I. GUK who was kuown, : :
had been discharged from the KGb because he had: recommended
NOSENKO's travel to Geneva. ‘According Co one rumor, the
chief of the Department in which NOSENKO had been employed, . ‘
would also lose his job. :

4

iH
can

a

CARS:

Leh aN Rew

Sate

3

i : -

wee

: Sons _ by .a sensitive source
Comment: MEDVEDEV, a “KGB officer formerly stationed tn x _ a
. .., New York City, was said by. to be one : er pe
of those from the CPSU Central Committee who | totes

conducted interviews with KCB personnel going te, ; -

abroad. @ ? identified MEDVEDEV, vw
Another sensitive source - Jogos 2oin

cl US Ga em

.
td,

22s SBP SRAS eRe RRR ar MAUS RTE HLT tebe
' ss


14-0000 ~

7 Top Secret’

(Annex A) : ., Sf

June 1964 (continved)

Comment: (Continued).
| REGS 3. Counselor of the Soviet Mission at the ’ t
United Natione, as the Communist Party organizer - :

and possibly a member of the KGB, but aaid that 2
MEDVEDEV's role is not important and that he “4
worked mainly with the Miniecry of Foreign Affairs. +

POCHANKINX, who NOSENKO had tdeatified as e ” :
KG8 officer, was sctill in Geneva in December 1966. : ;

Mat

29 July 1964

Accordin t i ‘
Chrom: san ed Seur ees , presumably KGB officers Mem

PF: : An invescigating commission of the

CPSU Central Committee checking into the circumstances :

surrounding NOSISKO's defection has thus far been responsible : i be

for the expulsion from the KGB of 15 Second Chief Directorate , nm

employees. These include GRIBANQV, who was also expelled

from the CPSU and was stripped of his rank of lfeutenant . : | ‘

-y ealbhet

co rr

“generel, GRIBANOV has been: given a very small pension, like
an ordinary Soviet citizen. This drastic acticn was taken
since the primary responsibility for the defection was placed
on GRIBANOV. It was realized that, in addition co being Chief
of the Second Chief Directorate at the time of the defection,

GRIBANOV was a perseunal friend of NOSENKO and had more or:
Jess treated NOSENKO as a protege and had taken many steps ‘

‘to further NOSENKO's career within the KGB. It was felt
‘that GRIBAXOV shold have been aware of NOSENKO's plans to
defect. Three of GRIBANOV's deputies were also expelled
from the KGB, cne of whom was a Major General BANNIK : a
[BANNIKOV]. Of the 11 other Second Chieé Directorate euployees
expelled, some were found to have been personal friends of’ sone
NOSENKO and some of them were found to have confided to NOSENKO ~
details of operations in which they were working. $.M. GOLUBBY,

“a KGB officer stationed in Washington, would be leaving for’ ee hee tee
Moscow because the investigating commission had determined “ :
that Yu. I. GUK, a mutual friend of NOSENKO and GOLUBEY ‘told
NOSENKO that GOLUBEV had been assigned to the Washington Legal ot
Residency. GOLUBEV had himself vorked with NOSENKO in KGB poe oe

Schacter J ta weds £3

Top Secret

"egg emerson trem echt cn semmnecrinn ="


14-0000." + wee

S acianeeciarees ed

(Annex A)

29 July 1964 (continued) . 7 ; f

Neadquarters sometime ‘in the past, but subsequently NOSENKO |
and GCOLUBLV were given different assignments within the KGB"
and thereafter did not associate with one another in rhe a .

course of their dally activit-es.

i

#.

i
ioe
3
oad
ey

i)

1
NOSENKO retracted in 1965 his earlier clains |:
that GRIBANCV had been instrumental in his :
advancement and asagignments. NOSENKO identi- |
fied by nave and photograpn GOLUBEV, whom he

Lad hnowa personally since 1959, but NOSENKO |
said he nad never worked with him at KGB Head-

oon meeteceitem eee preteens te

a
Fg
o
7
ts
ie]
[3
md

Patent bate

Gan

acs

efficient in the future”. The Legal Residency had not
before received any "reports or commentaries on NOSENKO' 8°

escape". : .

PRE

A quarters since -GOLUBEV had always been in the 4
F First Chief uirectorate. GUOLUSEV left for the i 3
USSR on 28 August 1964. ! J 2
. +
G : 4 5
_ JulyrAugust 1964 i}? ;
According to a sensitive source: . |. 5
5 phe first . 4
1 AEE NOS ve ay about 3
NOSENKO was ry fron KGB Headquarters which reported | | 4
the conclusions vf the commission which had been appointed | :
to prepare the damage report on NOSENKO's defection. The | :
letter, which was very brief, said that "the lose was very | ; 4d
great and some new forss of work should. be created to be. _ 4


4
4
«
3
i

November 1964 :

Asked while visiting the United States if the Russian .
people had been tuld of the ABEL-POWERS exchange, Soviet:
mathematician R.V. GAMKRELIDZE repiited cto an American
acquaintance that they had not been told officially’ but
they knew about it since there was “quite a grapevine” fn

»  . Moscow. It was im this way,;,GAMKRELIDZE stated, thet he.
learned of the NOSENKO defection and of ita significance.
According to the "grapevine", the defection was very .
damaging to Seviet Intelligence in that NOSENKO was the.
Chief of the American Section, and he knew the identities
of all Soviet agents in the United States.

2 sera aer Aa Art

Se pote dean


14-00000 -

(Annex A)

wes

November 1964 (continued) . . : .

GAMKRVLIDZE is suspected of having connections
with Soviet Intelligence because of his '
astatementa, actions, and unusual freedom of '
solitary movement while on visita to the United
States. GAMKKELIDZE rebuffed a CIA recruitment :
attempt in 1964, but added chat he "welcomed '
the opportunicy to meet with an American |
Inteiligence officer...to compare the Soviet ot
Intelligence officers he had met with their
American counterparte’. During that 1964

meeting GAMKRELIDZE again raised the subject

. of NOSENKO, describing hin as “obviously a } :
traitor to his country" ;

Decenber 1964 . :
— fo a Gees source :
Nikolay RESHETNYAK, NOSENKO's/roommate in Geneva at the /
time cf his defection, told € » that he had been
interrogated by the KGB in connecticn with NOSENKO'’s defection,
and that he had later attended the Moscow trial in which
NOSENKO was sentenced to death in absentia. RESHETNYAK !
reported to-d CRS »the dismissal.of large numbers of
KGB officers, including GRIBANOV and GUK. From what
RESHETNYAK sald, ® thought the KGB might go so far

source

!
i]
i
{
i
}
t
ey
4
1
|

“TS No. 197124

1 waleat mnt Denies

'
‘

eee perp semen eS
Cota
wvatecanth Seah

pein 7 eee

3
i


Sade Sebel ete ee SRT ARSE PE RID YET RO AOTC TE RANE Ta AEN es ret te AL ie eS

December 1964 (continued)

(Annex A) - Se oy “ , ot

as to send someone to the United States to Locate and kill
NOSENKO. i

fi»

later identified RESHETHYAK as a KGB

officer.)

Comment: NOSENKO identified RESHETNYAK as a Ukrainian
Ministry of Foreign Affaire officer on the
staff of the Disarmament Delegation. .

29 January 1905

According to” toa sensitive source

Pacer employees that GRIBANOV was expelled from the KGB and
CPSU and is now on pension, parttal ratrer than full, as a
result of the NOSENKO defection. When NOSENKO was being
considcred for assignuent to Geneva (in 1964), a summary -

statement of his activities was prepared in the Second Chief

Directorate and sent to GRIBANOV. Thie summary contained
considerable. “coupromtsing information", concerning NOSENKO;
if acted upon properly, it would have tenoved hin frow
consideration for this trip. GRIHANOV read the summary -
material, ran a line through all of it, and, added the note-
tion: "Send him to Geneva." The general. feeling is that
GRIBANOV was willing to. overlook ‘a lot of NOSENKO's _ os
deficiencies because of GRIBANQV's long-time friendsht{p .
with NOSENKO's father.

- Haw thw

Comment: NOSENKO originally asserted that GRIBANOV
was responsible for sending him to Geneva in.
1964, but after retracting his claim that .
GRIBANOV had played any special role in his

“ros sums assignments, ha asserted that BANNIKOV. approved
: the 1964 trip. . NOSENKO-denies that his father
cs and GRIBANOV were acquainted. i 7

ake

ear sres

"hak BR tarke anal

Sem ate ite AS heme


14-0000

(Annex A) ‘ : . . :

5 & February 1965
"According to a ro a sensitive source from a’ KGB officer

Prior to NOSENKO' 8!
Chief of 2 department in the
“Walle working in the Seventh
(Surveillance) Direccorate in Moocow, C3NaReis on three the KGB officer,
separate occasions participated in conferences between
“inportant people” of the Second Chief Directorate and the ;
Seventh Directorate. NOSENKO was present at all of these. !
Although SOSENEO was a Deputy Chief he held only the rank a
¢f captain an the AGB. @QBBMaB acteriftuced this (the the KGB officer |
- . disparity between tub and rank) to the influence which i
GRIBANGY exerted un the behalf of NOSE

: defection he was seputy to the
fi , Second Chief Directorate.

the KGB officer s
Consent: NOSENKO has never identified Qhuene NOSENKO : -
alvays claimed that he had been a lieutenant '

colonel in the KC3 until Cctober 1966, when he

retracted that claim and asserted that he had :
been ouly a captain.

According to a sensitive source from a KGB officer ' | 4

2k xe ‘GRIBANOV has been diszissed from |

the KCs, expe!led from the CPSU, and is presently living on ' .

* a small persion. His dismissal occurred immediately after ‘
NOSENKO'’s cefection. In addition, not less than 50 other ‘ : :
people were dismiszed, many of whom were close friends of :
GRIBANOV. Most of these were From the First and Second
Chief Directorates, with the mafority from the Second Chief
Directorate. The present Acting Chief of the Second Chief
Directorate is a Mafor General BANNIK, whose appointment
has vot yet been approved by the Central Committee of the

CPSU. One of his deputies is a Major General (7.A.)
SECHERBAK.

.
neem meen ere

ages LA IER os ae arts cage”
wu a ee

eC oR ae eas a .

18. Not 197124 rel

ae amen wscione tennant ont! Spee BEA


14-0000

(Annex A) . . : -

8 February 1965 (continued)

Cormest: GRISANOV was reported in operarional confiact

with a sentor Western diplomac until late
autumn 1964 (almost a vear after NISENKO's
defection’, when he turne? over that contact
to another KGB officer.

G February, 1965

-According to a source from a XGB officer

se} IA we he amount of danage caused
by NOSES: 3's defection is “unpredictable”. NJSENKO knew
few empicyees of the Tirst Chief Directorate working abroad,
but knew many such employees serving in KGB Headquarters by
virtue cf seeing them {tu the dining room thich ts reserved
fer chiefs and deputy chiefs of KGB departments.

Eariy June 1965
According to a sensitive source

(Pr conversations with KGS officers 5
: Major General BANNIKOV is curcently
temporary Chief of the Second Chief Directorate, having
replaced GRISAN9V who was expelled from the KG3 because he
Supported NCSENKO in his career. GRIBANOV is working in a-
small city outside Moscow aa the chiei of security at an
unimportant military plant and ts now a “nothing”.

i
i
de
1

ate

aa actgteemt cet BP

pede

spe eee

rot


14-0000

A)

15 Jul; 1965 .
According to a sensitive source froz a . xCB of ficer

een, wha attended the Hos cow meeting deseritenye A meeting

, of all First Chief Directorate _peraonnel at KGB Headquarters - . a
was held con 15 July 1965. The meeting was devoted to “he : a Be

: ; i 4
cfreumstances ef the expulsion of.thé Chief of the Second : 4
(Britis) Department of the First Chief Directorate, Ye. A. | } a
TARABRINS, about three and a half seaths earlier. I.A. BELOV i H “4

| : 4

official statezents made at the meeting, after the defection
of NOSENKO the KGB conducted an extensive investigation to
getermine which enployees knew him and the nature of théir
relationship. Curing this 1ARABRIN was questioned; he said
he knew NGSENKO, Lut only casually and only because of limited
contacts within the KGB. The-investigation determined, how-
ever, that TARABRIN attended several parties at which NOSENKO
was present, Girls tnvited by NOSENKO were also there.
described one such party. Thereafter, TARABRIN was

afforded a hearing and was accussed of willfully concealing \.-
ource wital information.

i
i and other officers also attended che meeting. According to

As a result he was expelled from the KGB oo
and the CPSU and was deprived of all pension rights. . 1

}
\ |
: Comment: KOSENKO had wost recently asserted that he met. }
q GRIBANOV soctally only three tines during his
KG3 service, and on each occasion TARABRIN was
Present. NOSENKO said he twice provided girls
for GRIBANOV and TARABRIN, once in October or
November 1963 in circumstances similar to those
referred to. NOSENKO said chat TARABRIN was
Chief of the British Department from 1958 to
1963, when he became Deputy Chief of “Service
to. 2", the reorganized Counterintelligence
Department of the First Chief Directorate. :

we tad acide


14-0000

:
7
?

ro

af NOSENKO's cefection, many :
sallei fran 1s: Patziy, ated |
Lk. : i-RLE Caeirzan SERIV, and Seconéi
Chief “Sirectorate. Chief GRIBANOV had been expelled from the :
Party anc from the KGh. GRIBANOV had been especially

friendly with SOSENKU, had givea him many privileges, and

. they were "buddies and night buddles".

ae

i
i

Comment: SEMICHASTNYY, not SEROV, was KGB Chairman in
1965. SEXOVY became head of the GRU in 1958.

Winter 1965-1966
Source, a

Salt ows Soave

self-professed former. XGB Second
Chief Directcrate agent (from KGB officer V.G. SVIRIN, a
colleague of her cone and at the State Conmittee for Scfence

ource
that SVIRIN was later head of a KGB unit conducting operations 1
against the American Embassy in Moscow): i

3
4

NOSENKO's father was a Minister or General and his cother
was Jevish and "always ‘involved in some blackmarketeering”
NOSENKO was not a KGB officer put a “civilian” connected
somehow with the KGB. then KOSENKO defected, everyone said
he was detestable. NUSENKO told the Americans about the
microphones and things (sic) in the Embassy.

BRU er ete be whee eR oc ney concer er RE eG DE ae TAME TE sadchenedaanewe trestle Neetemima cnet A et


14-0000

‘eaters

Tep Secret

(Annex A) : ; *

Winter 1965-1964 (continued). ; _ . 7

allegation {s the single report
describing NOSENKO as other than

i
Source’ S . . |
|

any

Janes

PE es

a KGS officer.

. ” ‘ é ’ 4

Marck 1966 _ ‘ 4
According to a sensitive source, : a

: 2 NOSENHO, |

‘who was not personally known vo A Was an important Source 3

vee w boss: in.the KOBS. «When: NOSENKO was a young man, he was in : 4

the GRU Mild:iary Acadeny and was then sent to the GRU |
Information Department for a short time; in all, perheps
for a year. NOSENKO had been a very undisciplined person i
while in the GRU and "not very good". He wan to have.been i '
discharged from the GRU; however, his father, who was a very i tt 4
influential person in the Ministry of Shipbuilding, was’ ,
able to get NOSENKO trarco*--red to the KGB. It was the opinion

Source of persons, to whom Ptalked that NOSENKO had. given
very, very. good information to the U.S. after his defection .
and that NOSENKO had had great access to KGB infornation !
.which included all means of KGB coverage of people in 7 ; , .
Moscow, microptione systems in the embassies, etc. Based on | i :
NOSENKO's information the American Embassy found many of the ....-.... ‘
microphones. : t

volte om . yar

Tame

lpaarce

14-0000

erie

ed

sha,

Fast ere rae aeeneu! set

“ment

“Aeadeay w

NOSESEO has claimed that h rejected an offer
to attend the Military Diplomatic Academ.

abich he, like ype; called che “GRU Source

Military Ag “ademy), by choice accepting assign-
. “the Far East on entry to the GRU fin
the time, the Military Diplomatte

a four-year course; if NOSENKO

did attend the school, he could not heve
setvel asthe claimed in che GRU. C@edE is Source
the sole, source (Lesides NOSENKO) whe alleged

SENKO, ‘sérved in the GRU.

1953. At.

4

pect eicadtis atl Ed vatn tea

A

ares

ee waar casthatobcatcdl Seedy Oo a

Chace

etal de wes SERRE!


(Arner AY. ‘ -_ . . Poo _ a

prceaeiaeeal

‘pe we tess

oaTaa a
Bie ota “stat seer nar

1 6 SFa

a5 =ESG

eee on SL EeEart ee arene
BP FP Pe PE GAB ES Be eh. Eee rae peri orettnaers

2 BCC G RI i ERT ONE — 2 e
SAF Da SL CRG BB

Taree

Bet ALS

[se]

eae etn Serge tee
4, POS. 5 oo ee Bee A

Gh EE ee dae: % i ARTES BE BE ERATE
a pee ae aerate a ba oe Spe Bg
' tt sg ARE Pars w edad
% Selita: I SOMTOR Hn Petes Os oemre |
ERwin oda sutie Dd ee ie SELTETALT oe ede sags er

CB STP RY M2 A a

ry

a

|
'
a
H
'
1

i
,

'

Geter it ars Sat Saal BE OFM LT A SEER ee PEN, CTRL we ;
(Uta Gist AERGM CRY KALE EERO THD oa
ie BIEL SRY CSOT 9 12 C, BR ER SES CTO i PRT
amtrae (Rees Penies SUBSE EA ANE SVEN SAE Le 7:
POSEAT LS RR LET a

Tic Boe TTA

395°
- “TS No.. 197124
. Copy. 10.

27 IN LAUT EE Ecc Ne ;

Bane

ew

i
yeh oe on
a ew ald a Le Fiat!

y

& Pinseascua leg. -*
eee

‘jl


14-0000

D8 apt pngiae ses ya een ean PO helt og stats

Mid-1966

Yurty Dmitriyevich KOROLEV, a Soviet journalist, visited
Paris and spoke: with representatives of the French magazine
Paria Match. KOROLEV indicated that he would like to serve
48 a stringer for the French journal and proposed that he

- begin with a atory on the life ofthe family of a "Sovier
secret agent”. Ag KOROLEV apoke only broken French and ~

Englieah, the magazine ataff did not seriously pursue the
matter at that tine.

Comment: KOROLEV is believed identical with YurfLy FROROLEV
who, as of 1964, was employed part-time for
the United Press International Moscow corres~
pondent, Henry SHAPLRO, whoo both NOSENKO and
GOLITSYN have identified as an agent of the KGB
Second Chief Directorate. KOROLEV has travelled
previously to Brussels as a correspondeut for
the Soviet publication Sputnik, 2ad to Japan
and the United States es s correspondent for
Novosti, the Soviet news Agency. The offer by
an official Soviet press representative. of
information on a "Soviet secret agent", which

: : turned out to refer to NOSENKO, is without
. precedent.

October 1956

Soviet Journalist Yu. D. KOROLEV returned to Paris with
o an interpreter to renew his offer to Peris Match editors to..
Provide a story on the life of the family of a “Soviet secret
agent", The story «as to concern NOSENKO's family and their

rs
anatins $ seitenls

veer Fle ts Stat bat tae

wrestedhnl 5

toe

14-0000

Me)

», knew these matters better chan\t

CAnnex A) : ; oe
Setober 1946 (continued)

Statement KOKULEV provided Parts Match editors stated:
"NOSENKO, ahout 36-438, an officer of the Soviet Secret Polic
Organization, defected to the USA without his family about
two years a6 and asi.ed for polittieal asylum in the U.S.:

life in Moseuw since NOSENKO's defeccion. A short background
e

it was granted to him. This was the mest serious defeat of :
the Soviet Security organs as NOSENKO occupied important
positions fn vesptlonape and counterespionape departments and

also was clowely acquainted with the ccuntry's leading
families and tomes. - NOSENKO!s "family consists of a wife,
35, two dauyhturs, 10 and 12, a@ mother and a younger brother.
The family tu nee prosecuted (sic) but feel very badly adout |
the incident (the defection}. Very soon the wife will apply!
to the International Lawyers Organization fur a divorce and '
Compensation, Jt is possible that this case will be given.
nuch publictty, His wife has not heard from him since he
cefected, but tt is obvious chat he is still in the USA."
KUROLEV displayed a photo spread showing NOSENKO's wife and
family going about their daily affairs in Moscow, and :
indicated that additional photographs of NOSENKO's family i
could be obtained and that intarviews with then and with

others knowlny NOSENKO could be arranged for a Paris Match °
correspondent, :

i

Lomment: A divorce from a defector from the Soviet Union,
who is legally considered to be an enemy of the
_Gtate, is granted automatically upon the wife's;

Tequest. ,

(from personal knowledge): Referring to his own |

ge of KGB organization, @gqe said if NOSENKO heard
his explanation, he would call

because he had’ served
at KGB lleadquarters longer. ;

be

28 January 1%) 7 y

a child, since NOSENKS

Seer


14-00000 4. 5 ” ’ Co a
4 dg :
teat aR Rd urges

(Annex:-A) i , . ae wt

3 February 1967

i x “According toa “sensitive source
map (from unidentified GRU sources in Moscow)?

NOSENKO worked only in kU Information Deaparenent of the GRU,
and only for about five or six months, after which he went
“to the KGB. :

May 1967
ae “According to a sensitive source

Ne worked. on it, knew
al about it and exposed the whole system of work. He knew
all the posts, the sources (fev words unclear) he knew all
the surveillance groups and knew survetllants by sight.

4 According to a sensitive source

: adh :
; NOSENKO worked in the Gav In rmation Department he worked
i only fi the Center (Headquarters) in Moscow. We worked badly
there, and received bad efficiency reports, as a reault of
which he had argunents. Then with hia father's help he went

to the KGB.

- 5S. June 1967.
According to a. sensitive source
(Hest ESSA PrP aneee y: There had been some
. Kes sucpicions ef Pa vel Fedorovich SHAKHOV while he was ia
. Geneva, because he had allegedly had many American contacts
~cowhich he had not reported, and NOSENKO vas sent to Geneva .to

SHAKHOV.

‘Comment: NOSENKO claims he was sent to Geneva in 1962
to investiyate SHAKHOV.

investigate him. Rezident KULEBYAKIN is still suspicious of

spt

Moone te

2 dae eae

an Teal


