14-0000

104-10106-10300 { 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 |

Jf. RETURN TO CIA _ OL IS SAYA he
me . "i Background Use Only . Cc
“us : Oo Not Reproduce se

Yurily Ivanovich NOSENKO

IDENTIFICATION: NOSENKO, Yurily Ivanovich, a Soviet
KGB officer who defected in 1964 and
was subsequently involuntarily con-
fined in the U.S. by the Agency for
a period of approximately three years.

BACKGROUND : NOSENKO first contacted Agency per-
sonnel in Switzerland in June 1962
and subsequently defected. in. January
1964. NOSENKO was brought to the U.S.
and after a period of relative freedom
. he was involuntarily confined in
_ April 1964. From April 1964 to
, August 1965, he was confined at an
Agency controlled site in Clinton, '
Maryland. From August 1965 to
October 1967,.NOSENKO was confined
at |Camp Pear Virginia. In October
1967, he was returned to the Washington
area, given increasing amounts of
freedom until he was given total free-
dom in April 1969. NOSENKO became a
U.S. citizen in April 1974. NOSENKO
meer ‘was employed by the Agency as a
consultant in March 1969 and continues
under contract to date. His present
salary is $23,500 per year.

APPROVAL : (1) The legal basis to confine NOSENKO
against his will was discussed by
Mr. Richard Helms, DD/P, and others with
the Deputy Attorney General on 2 April
1964 (Tab 1). On 3 April 1964, the
Agency General Counsel, Mr. Lawrence
Houston, advised the Director of Security
by memorandum that such confinement was
proper (Tab 2).

a

eee (2) There are a series of lettérs from
the DDCI, DCI and others to various
agencies, including the Department of
_Justice and the White House, covering
the period 1964 to 1969, evidencing
awareness of these agencies of the
NOSENKO affair (Tab 3).

(3) The conditions of NOSENKO's confine-

ment were established by the Office of
Security (Tabs 4 § 5).

up

14-0000

RESULTS

TERMINATION

a COMMENTS

cc

‘By memorandum dated 2 October 1968,

the Director of Security forwarded
two reports to the DDCI summarizing.
the results of the NOSENKO case to
that date. The reports are voluminous.
One was prepared by the Office of
Security and the other by the FBI.
Both reports conclude that NOSENKO
was a bona fide defector. A draft
memorandum attached to this file,
dated 21 October 1968 and prepared
by the CI Staff, raises question
regarding NOSENKO's bona fides

and challenges the above two reports.

NOSENKO continues under contract to

the Agency. He is brought to Washington ,
periodically to consult on matters ;
germane to his background and experience.
Various reports dre available in the
files of the Office of Security which
detail financial aspects of this case.

No final accounting has been made since
the project continues.

(1) While the Office of Security files

do document the rationale for the original
confinement of NOSENKO, they do not
document the rationale for his continued
confinement over so long a period of time.
A memorandum dated 5 August 1969 states
that various congressional staff officers
were briefed on NOSENKO and states that
concern for his safety, as well as con-
cern regarding his bona fides, prompted
the prolonged confinement.. (See Tab 6)

(2) Office of Security files document
a period in 1969 during which a mail
cover was placed on NOSENKO.

(3) During the above period, NOSENKO

was allowed a pleasure trip to Florida.
During this trip, Agency personnel, with
apparent Headquarters approval, obtained
the services of prostitutes. This
apparently occurred on at least two
occasions.

14-0000

FILES 2

DN eral

oe oe tee

CC

Office of Security files on NOSENKO
are maintained in the following
locations: ;

OS/SSD (Contact - Mr. Charles Phalen)

OS/SAG (Contact - Mr. Bruce Solie)

14-0000

SR April 1964

MEMORANDUM. FOR. RECORD 2

SUBJECT: Discussion. with Deputy Attorney. 2
_ _ General on Nosenko Case

e  Eyec Wr Hellas.’ Mr. -Houston and Mr. Murphy met with ”
the Deputy Attorney General and tesbers of his staff to _
discuss subject case, - Present froz Hr. Katzenbacht s-— eet
staff were Messrs. Foley, Yeagley and Reis. 0. ae

ee Sarre Helas explained the Hosenko case briefly *: >.

what the legal position would be in circumstances in.

. which ve detained Nosenke against his will for this pur-
pose. . Second, we would have to he ready after determin-

ing. that we could obtain no additional information £rom oo -
Nosenko to deport him, We had thought of taking hin to

-Germany.and transferring hin to Soviat custody in Borlin. -
where this has been done a number of tines in the past. .

"3, There was some discussion of whether deportation.
to another country might be a consideration. Mr. Halas

 explainad wo would probably face publicity probleas in!

deportiag to 2 third country of the kind we would en- —
counter if he ware free in the U. Ss. Nr.’ Helms noted _
there were many itess of. information which we and the.

‘FBI realize are of no significance because of the file —

holdingsswe have but which an unscrupulous newspaper man
could use to creates: sischies, This aspect was then dropped
and it was the consensus. that Berlin was probably the best

place, _

4. The question of the pasis for detention was again
raised and related by Mr. Foloy to the conditions under
which Nosenko is in this coumtry. We is hore as an “ex-
clusion and parole case" which means he has not been
admitted and has been paroled to the Agency which is
responsible for him while he is in this country. This


14-0000

/ a Do . “ .
: Ss Be py

parole can be interpreted’ to mean parole to a specific
locale which would provide sone justification for our _
detaining hin for questioning. It was then pointed out, -
however, that. if he said he wished to leave the country: .
to saturn to the Soviet Union, technically we would not -
bo able to detain. hin- further. .In this event, we would
be faced with the- need to deport his quickly and quiatly
and for this purposes the. immigration warrant of arrest.
and deportation, a5 probably the‘best instrument. 7
..Se: Ure. Katzenbsch asked Mr. Foley to check into -

this and Mr. Foley will in turn contact Mr. Houston,
~/-°. Mr. Houston will in turn discuss the problem with CIA .-—
- 2 -. ) O€£Fice of Securit officials to get the background-of |.
ees their liaison with the INS on these Matters, coe Re,

Nr. Helas thanked. Mr. Katzenbach for his assistance

parted amid some jovial banter with respect to

- "The Spy Who Came in Fros the Cold" about what we expected
to happen to him when he started to Climb ayer that “wall
in Berlin, = — ; ; , . _ :

a a, David E. Murphy”
oe, . CO Chief, SR Division


14-0000


14-0000

Tee

ae ‘ ui
Pd - ? at
tes iD a
1 _—— ‘ Oo OGG 64-0903
: * 7 i. 7
: ~ ROS
: - oe oan
: grt.
we - fe 3 Aprih 9646000 a

* MEMORANDUM FOR: : Director of Security i

~“-  «-SUBJEGT: ©’ Parole Status of Defectors

..  1,: On 2 April 1964 we had a discussion with the Department ~~ ey
ty, of Justice or the status of aliens whose inspection by I&NS is deferred <-
“upon arrival at our request and who are then paroled to this Agency. * oe
It was the position of the Department of Justice that we were responsible

7 for taking any action necessary to carry out the terms of the parole.

tf pee 2 hoe mw Eo Ue meER Som Sete NRT ft OO ON renee

“2, As you know,. a basic parole agreement was executed by the ; “.

- ‘Attorney General and the DCI on 10 February 1955. After setting up

'. conditions for authorizing parole in any one case, the agreement states: , - +
"After parole of such aliens, the Central intelligence Agency will assume." -: we

on responsibility for care, supervision and control of a.kind and degree it - - |
’ believes consistent with the internal security needs of the United States ,

| during continuance of their parole status." This means that the _

a responsible Agency officials must take the minimum action necessary

netfee oe a
.? .

Foe wns ws meee

. to protect the internal security needs of the United States. ‘The word :
“minimum" is not necessarily a limitation. It merely means that good -
judgment must be used as to what kind and degree of action is necessary,’ ,

: . =f . . : :
3. The agreement further provides that upon-completion of the :
parolee's intelligence or operational purposes in the United States or if :

internal security reasons so require, the alien will be removed from i,
this country through arrangements made by the Agency and, in such ve ;
case, the A ywill inform vice in advance of each proposed

Gus hehe 7) Mossle 7

LAWRENCE R, HOUSTON
General Counsel ,

. 7 . ta . . . : ‘ i Ro OR See et wen oy; ohne pete et
snvenetgd ence. ncn a ee ee A ee — — aa
me cane mame mae ym mame 7 : Lo . . ets re ee a et te me


14-0000


14-0000

(¢ _ (C Tanuary 1975

SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO

l. Information that NOSENKO had defected and was in the United
States in February 1964 was known to appropriate agencies. and articles
had appeared in the public media.

2. NOSENKO was in the United States under an I&NS parole as
the responsibility of CIA. The FBI was fully advised of the Presence of
NOSENKO in the United States and interviewed NOSENKO | on several
occasions in March 1964. The United States Intelligence ‘Board was
also formally advised on 12 February 1964 concerning the defection of
NOSENKO, On 14 February 1964, NOSENKO was interviewed by Soviet

in the presence of I&NS and State Department officials
officials/and NOSENKO reaffirmed his previous request for asylum in

‘the United States.

14-0000

the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, as amerded,
‘I approve and xyacommend for your approval the entrance
of subject into the United States for permanent resideace
~ sinca-his ents ‘is in the interest of the nati national security

pay tn pasordance with previous correspondence in
. Section 7 cases,. it is understood that you, will present this.

: ‘Since his. defection i im: vebruary 7 1964,- ‘the: oubject has>
provided valuable. information to ae Agency and he will.

period of five. years and bas ‘submitted toa technical inter” .
rogation. Ths question of bona fides is a continuing one and
should any information be developed definitely disproving his <-_ eee
bona fides, it shall he mada available to your Service and the .. >
Attorney Gener ral, ms ra .

. Gz0er 1
> Sa a | Saeaded irom quarts
‘ downgrzdiag aad
! declazsificatisa


14-0000

ie ? 8 October 1969

sf Hod Osdorn se OR EIS
: dasa enemenemnpamanemeetemeerer re epmrterenra rman ine eet mananmnit enn tan nnn


14-0000

Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO (Aka: Yuri NOSSENKO) |”

30 October 1927

Nicolayey, Ukraine, USSR ao)
i Male - ‘Divorced -.- ‘Brown Biue/ Gray Sit. I inchea :
_ Soviet ~. | Carcasian -~ |

,

-_— ae


14-0000

Maa

ine

cS
Ee

en

1, USSR:
a oo ta s a 3 & Pgety: . a _ Z


14-0000

vich NOSSENKO'-

. 9

YYational-interest

. _ ws ad
wae Pe ss Sto this Ageatys—“Therefare- it

:

is requested subject's.”
*- parole to this Agency be extended far an additiqnal. |~
“ period of six. (6}. months beyond the expiration date of
"his stay of 16 August. 1969. Tet £0 ke

209 Wietor RA white
Deputy Director of Security- i
stigations and Operational Support) .

: {Inve
b |
OS/AAS/LW:es 16 July 1969 — -

+

HOT TO SE GISSEMINATED FHRTUER pa crea
~ 70 AWyBE aD) P

CEHTRAL [43 AERTS

args:

WOU


14-0000

: SH my

CORD

ERN AL”:
NLY

INT.

“USE 0

[7] CONFIDENTIAL

a

SECRET

PPEMICUS. *
EONICNS.

Sé

=6T0°


14-0000

foo 4s ( .
ft . 2 ~ -o
| . ; "dt February 19540
maswan 7 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. MeSeorge Buady a
SUSJECT: =) Yurd ‘Yvanovick BOSENKO .

xe

‘4. This monoraadim refers to the Szate Departuent =. -
relaase of 16 Fabruary.on subject case and provides addj-~*-  -°
tional background as wéll-as information ea his current... i
Status... a So het SPoet Tine when, a

- Ze As 2 EGS staff officer, NOSENZO is regulariy=y
assigned to the Counterintelligance Directorate of the = .
KGB in Nescow but was included in ths Soviet delegation ~~
to the Disamaxent Conference’ as part of a cover arrange.
ment which sereitted his to carry out intelligence and fy 0.
Security iumetions in Geagva on behalf of the ECB...

=

ane <” Sa. HOSENXO also attended various sossions of the
“ ” Bisarmanent Conference held in Genova in 1982. During -
| the. course. of these sessions NOSENKO sough? contact with Te
./ O8£ficlials of the us. Governzent, informed these erficials =.
“i; That he was affiliated with the Sevier State Security ap~
-. > paratus and volunteerad to aid the U.S. Government ::
sere as 7 datecting Soviet subversive activity directed againat the |...
Cost of U.S, Government, - During the course of his contact with .. a
wl. . U.S. authorizries HOSENXO stated thar his cooperation with. -
the @. S. Governzant originated with his distaste and hatred .-
_'. £or the Soviat Yegime in seneral, with his desire to obtain 2°...
. + 7. yevange for the unjust doath of his father, ‘s Senior official" -
, Zn the Sovise Shipbuilding industry, and with the general .. - =
“ " adairatioa of the Americans with whom he had come in con~
“, tact within the Sovist Usien. a

eo, - 4. In lato January 1964, NOSENKO arrived in Genova, —

“Tol again Rasquerading as a maaher of the Soviet delegation —~

to the Disaraaent Conference, Subjecz Secretly uvtified .

His CIA contacts inthe United. States conceming -his pres--
euce ia Geneva and arrangad to meet with these contacts,.
Duriag a series of ssetings NOSENXO proyided informaticn
including docunsnts concerning Soviet Stato Security acti-~
vyitias within the USSR and abroad and a detailed Recount
ot the XSB operation against U. S. Professar & rghocra
which NOSENKO said ha had personally supervised at the
Girection of Szurcuas NiY¥, the Chairmen of the Coamittée
for State Security (X63). a

e


14-0000

. 7. . 7 tls “an on py = | ae.

5. During these MOST recent Heelings NOSENKO announced
Ais desires -to- laays tha uSsSs2 permanentiy and seek his fururg
in the West. rg Claised his new work in the KGs (First .. -
Daputy Chisf af thar cepartaent charged with the SUrveaillance
and recruitzent of Aperican yisiters to the USSR) was OxX~..
—. . pasding and that he would not be able to visit the Fest. ; :
oi. with any traquency.. Accordingly, he prepaxved ‘a -request for
'  ™ palitieal asylus in the UGoitod States." He was taker-to -:. me
Fraaxfurt, Garmany where he is currantliy: undergoing intarro-
gation. Plans are now being made to remove hiz to the USS.

“8

Pee mee we * 2 Mg #84:

2g. “Itcshonld be noted that CIA ‘contact with su ject; °°
has not besr extensive and that wa Nill require additionat
thorough interrogation to establish Subjact?s beaa fides,.

ae Ts should -also be noted that HOSENKG's: daties Were: not ‘con-

re es srned with substantive aspects of the Disarmazent Conference,
bee aad he therefore is HOt expected to be able to shad Buch, if 7
Poole c ° anyy Light. on that aroa of our interest, . | ar he
a a Te. The possibllicy that ROSEHXO* 5 defection was dk -

boar Soa ct Signed to wreck the conference was most carefully considered,
Potts ‘i The-decision tc accept hin wag taken on thé convicrion thar
foo. so. the Soviets would nor have chosea such 3 yolnerablo agent: -
Po >. Qstazl officer of the X53) for this kind of Boye, . ;

ae

4 - 3 _ Thonas B.. Saranessines

2 _ 7 | Acting Deputy ‘Director:
. AA et Lm “~ for Plaas 1...

7, 7 CSR/DEM/Ji€ 0 11 Feb 64 er

el. ' Distribution:. ne Tooth -

Orig ~ Adse-. and
SR/CI/K-Dowaey TS
“Tec - C/CL i A er

icc - CSR. ae _ soe De
DD/Os ; oe

7

a
t

ryre ~

14-0000

“SUBJECT:

~ Stags,

. KGB in Moscow but-sas included in the Soviet dalegation

ment which pernittéd hia to eaxry out intelligence
| Sseurity Zunctions in Caneva on behalf of the KGB.

: Disarzasent Conference heid in Geneva in 1962,. During the-

- paratus. and yoluatesred zo aid the B. 3, Goverment-in

nt U. Ss Governnsnt, ~ Purine the courses of his contagz with =
‘. = . .

tact withia the Se

Fs. BAD bald
, CN TRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

- WASHINGTON 25, D.C.

. _, OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

12 Febrnazy. 1964. °°

~

NEYORANDUM FAR: _ Vaktad States Intolligencs Board Meabers |

Yuri Ivanovich NOSENKO wo.
“) da This memorandua refars to the State Departuent’
‘Feleasa of 18 February on subject’ case and provides addi-
‘Sienal baskgrouad as wéll as infermation on his currené:-

__, 20, As a XSB staf¥ officer, NOSERXO ts regularly.
assignad toe the Counteriutel lisence Directorate of the

.t9 the Disarmament Confersaca as part of a cover ar

3, * NOSENZS also attended various sessions of

course of these sessions, HOSENKO. sought contact. vith -

ofticials of the Uy S, Goveranont, informed these cfficiais
that. he was sffiliatod with the Sevist Stata Security ap-

detecting Sovier. subversive activity: directed aesinst the |
U. S, anthorities, HOSEXES Stated that his cocperation with
tke U. S. Gaevernaant originated with his distasts and hatred.
for the Soviet regine in Seneyval, with his dasive te obtain —-"
revenge for the unjust desth of bis father, 2 senior official
in the Soviet Shipbuilding industry, and with the geveral -~
awsiration of the Anericans with wWhea he had coms in con

3 ® Union. . Loge eo Stel oa

on

' 4. In lats January 1384, HOSENZO avrivog in Genevs,
again masquerading as a mesabor of the Soviag delagation
fo ths Disarmament Conference, Subject Secretly notified
his Cik contacts in the United Stazes concerning bis pras-
ences in Gansya and arranzed to aeet with these contects,

Buring a series of meetings NOSENKS provided information
includins documents concoming Soviet State Security acti-
vitios within the USSR and abrond ang a detsi


14-0000

| SN ; | - : ‘ . . -
ao C. a :

of the XGH operation against U; 5. Professor Sarzhoorag ~

_ Which NOSENXO said he had personally supervised at-the —

. direction of SEHICHASTALY, the Chairman of the Comaitter _
. £or State Securlty-(XGB).° - Coe Ae Dae a

og Se. During: these most recent neatings:- NOSENZO announced
~ his: dasire to leave the USSR pernanently and seek his future

‘din the Nest. : He claimed his new workin the KGB (First:-: -

and reernitzent. of: American visitors: to.the USSR) was ax~
panding and that‘he would not be abla to visit the Yest .--

~ political asylum in. the United States. He was taken to---.-*
Frankfart, Geraany where he is currentiy undergoing interre-
- : Sore EAD tee . 1 otto. wl ete ra a
See By & should de seted that CIA contact with ‘Subject ~~
“has not beow extensive and that wa vill require additionsi
“thorough interrogation to establish Subject’*s bona fides. .-
= should alse be noted that NOSENKO'’s duties ware. not con-

and he therefore. is net expected to be ebla ta. shed. puch,
. Smyy light on that. area Of our interest. = +

“.fstaff officer of.the %63) for this kin

. . — a 7

"° Marshal’ 5. Carter ~ -
Lisutenant’Ganeral, USA | -
“x | . Deputy Biygetor > -

Beputy Chief of thar department charged with the surveillance
with any frequency. Accordingly, hea prepared a reguest: for 7

. gation. Plans are nov being made to Yenove him to the Ue Se

““earned with substantive aspects. of the Digareament Contereace,
L LE

7 7.. Tas possibility that NOSENXO's defection vas da-" | -~ :
“signed te wreck. the conference was most carefully considered.
.. The. decision to accept hiz. was: taken on the conviction that.
' the Soviets vould net. have chosen. such « yalnerable agent™
d of move, :

14-0000

Settee ree emp eee se

: - WASHINGTON, * "Pebseh
. Yuri .I:| Nosenxo told = -Sovi
- . Embassy“olicial at. theiercan: f=
frontation here-last 1 Friday. that;*
be lett: Switreriand. on the- way,
the. Uhited™ States 28 -hours} . :
hetence ‘his{detection~ was-tre~|Swiss:
: 3 to.

- to Lies aid
|! tha: Soviet, diplomat during their’

: ted to ale se Ib
 erecceetbates usinesslike- co: 2 th:
- This statement by “ine focazer 1 sIaformation® ee able| defected: “ofshise owe vot pe

tats ‘officer ‘oi-the” Soviet Com-}today: ;has_ rth pew ight without any-outsid, ires
mites: ‘of, Stete';Security? tha on thé defectioa= > _ sie Siig statements Wugeraeen
;Secret police‘appeared to amount] They Sovier-ix ~ inked, did ‘not. allay Soviet -résenté
to a denial of the Soviet charge Geneva; ik. lwas* ment againstrSwis ‘authorities:
vthat. te, Swiss: duthorities. b3a| the. Swiss! police 2t.5 PAE Fed. Diplomatic-report
ting his}5- that #fr:“Noseako-was. miss-
a 1. ~.] gw But 3ir..Nosenko's - state
'.. Miz Nosenxo;"who quit“as a{maats“in- the? presence :of “th
whee member of the Soviet celegrtion! Soviet Exnbass¥ vftici2l: ace. said
. to the Genev2. sarmamentcon- le have. saowa that

ching the
State-Department “said that. So-].
viet “diploma ts:in foreign: ‘capi-
tals? ‘continued<to-register- ¢ com-
plaints ‘about alleged. negligence!

is actual ater. Mr: Negenko's | ‘conference
eS ference Feb: £ was’ allowed: to| defection: took“pl t JPL with the et:
rage” with {2--Soviet : Siplomat the. preceding daz:
here in’ the-presexce, of: ;United (3; S:Sovi2E: delégst on: ax

Fnounced” atithe: time. that=the ~*
|conontation was -takiag plac:
is Washingtom at the requestio£

the: Soviets Embassy, - but: no
other details.were made -oubdlic.jtom “field— “offic
Ione. department. said that. -abmigratio;

q, \


14-0000

fieswas? interview Syste
day by® officials. o! bath. “th
Russian and. SwEs 5 Em

icial was present each tine:
gsenko reaffirmed ‘his earlies

These developments - came
“is the Soviet Uniom kicked up
‘tg diplomatic fuss over the dis~
“appearance of° _Nosenko oD

Feb. 4, from Geneva, “where
ne nad teen assigned as an- .
Sexpert” in the Soviet delega- *
“Mion at the 37-nation disarma-
‘meat conference. ” Phillaps

‘said. he was.“on temporary
‘duty from KGZ. (secret DO.
neadavarers in Mos:

teow.
: Up ta yesterday Moscow
hed been Cirecting its public
‘Golomatic wrath at the
them with

charging

diplomat to inter:
o w25 to assuce
the United
o part in no.
ct on their soil. .- .
already had cée

charg 135.
Oa W ednesday. Phillis

See DEFECTOR, 3


14-0000

—_— I
‘

Shea-e

ire ee be

ices Soviet” disarmament. dele
gates: Semyom GK-+-Tsarapsi
gave-newsmen-an! angry’s state, Mascow ove a
-meéattaimed, at: the. “Swiss :and gation 2

tear Siu pedi
laces,

ie cou re the capitai: bss DB
inowiegaes of part orths KGB “Iwas-felt here:that Moscow:
; but” Pr a Blyr. 206 uch: Ss more. ‘might. chav

: Tae a any- “ate U.S:
' se-yeakold- Nosenko-: is. a gen-\ disarmament :negotiator’ Wil-

a

tuine deisctoc. thiugh ‘the pos-|tiam ‘C. Foster and’ Tsarapxin |
sidility70f his - being” a doubletneld another business session ;
agent ‘nas: not? teen: eee a Geneva yesterday at which i¥ Y

‘ed. Ituatsa felt- here - thatithey said the case-was-not dis-
t<"was nolcussedst. -
d id be. ex.f-- It also was‘noted . here that

- for. ary the™ Soviet. Communist: Party


14-0000


14-0000

{ “havaibecioate a are. to be made for the installation of”
 “adequate‘air- conditioning equipment to insure that a.
comfortable. temperature is maintained. (It is under-

stood that there is quite a bit of equipment available
through Logistics channels, }

(3) Subject is to receive a bath; change of underwear;
change. of uniform; and a change of linen for his bed.


14-0000

_or schedule of. ‘assignments.

‘as to- their responsibilities in. this : matter,

-r ddition to- oe above,

wim ate nes

= r ascertained that we: will] have » custody. of:

athe Subject until at least July: ' It was: suggested that perhaps. we may
wish .to-explore. some modifications in the assignment of personnel ,
In. addition, ° ‘the Acting Chief, Support
Branch has suggested. that -: mmediate: consideration be givento. -
devising necessary. ‘procedures. to- -be’ followed’ ‘in the. event of an

emergency involving loss of “control of: ‘the Subject. ‘This ‘should

and ' ‘Specific’ procedures devised, and ali’ ‘guards properly informed |

- ° Se Jack M. Bauman
Bauman/ewd(5-12-64)


14-0000


