: NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 1
_ a _ _ 4


. iF, viiltips —

a feel 30, 1975

| y “HA@FERTAL FOR SLASE SELECL COMMEY<TE (SSC)
| Se EMIT ‘Tat ELLIGENCE ACLIVILTES

ee

7 iv ~ CRESS 5 OEE Laie ior, wee oh
2. OIGINATING ORGANIZATION: FBI
3. UATURE OF MATERTAL: Letterhead memorandum '
4, DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified
5, NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP: NA
G. SUMMARY OF COuTENYS:

LUM refers to request of the 58C for a List of
names and titles of certain FBI Intelligence Division CINTD)
personnel at FBINQ and numbers only of certain other ITD
personnel; and relates agreement reached between FBI officials
and Mr. William Miller, Staff Director of the SSC, that the .
original request be modified as follows. The FBI will prepare a
the necessary List and make it available for review at FBIHQ

by appropriately cleared personnel of the SSC Staff.
7. REQUESTER/DATE OF REQUEST: SSC. 3/19/75

ay o232.8°

Bee REA

8, RELEASIVG aUTHORLiy: Fer {EC 106 Ve

1G MAY 7 1S
9, DATE OF SUBMISSION: 4/8/75

ecmmmcrorns esate 6 =

acsee 10. LOCATION OF FIL COPY: FBI file 62-116395-53  (
ssoc, Vir. _ . \ ‘
Dep. AD Adm. _ * \ .
x rere a 11 e WONE. aut Te RTO} OA enter ms, i - a ty yo { .
2 amin Te ee “ED oe '
natn SEP:ekw C{4 | Dat Sane sne

Files & Com. 44)

Gen, Inv. _
{dent.!

inspection »——NOTE : - Original via liaison to Central Community Index in

Intell,

Laboratory connection with Senstudy 75. on

Plan. & Eval. (t !

Spec. Inv. it ob ‘eel

Training Og

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. : .

Direetor rend cre C—] TELETYPE UNIT (_] Gpo oH
Biiradabe bai Hotid:32489628 Page 2


£ S-1tha (Rev. 3-21-73) 4
ween ; . a

intelligence Division

- J (oo INFORMATIVE NOTE
eco Date “4/25/75

You were previously advised that
Jouglas Durham, former MP 4115-E, who has
furnished high-level information regarding
activities of the American Indian Movement
(AIM), after being confronted by AIM lead-
ers, admitted being a confidential infor-
mant for the FBI. This information has
been made public,

Attached teletype from Omaha advises
that Assistant U. S. Attorney Keith E. Uhl
Office of Special Prosecutor, stated he
received a telephone call 4/24/75 from
urham and that Durham told him he had bee
contacted by representatives of the Office
.- of Senator Frank Church, Washington, D. C.,

equesting Durham's presence in Washington

during the week of April 28, 1975,-for
urpose of attending staff meetings to

determine his potential as a witness befor

committee investigating operations of the

BI. Durham indicated he intended to com-

ly. and would have no further contact with

the FBI. We are following this matter
- losely and you will be kept advised,

~- General Investigative Division
- Legal Counsel Division
External Affairs Division

~ William O, Cregar wig Wy

yt Can

ay pur

PPR
I

> PDN 41 xj” onl
Lo

bos/Fat

NW 68296 Docid:327909628 Page 3


! j sgsoc. Dre

i Te e
_ : oo, . “%
oa . ‘ an Dep.- AD-Adog
al - . . Dep A D.~ 10 Te snenen §
. - 4 ~®- Asst. Dir: i

Lac aes “ares gens abe gy , : Adin se meeemtnrmemtne Fe
Ze oe ARARS SEGT! tye? ee _ i
. Ff a sé Raine A”
-_ :o . APR: SAD , | Gon, fe neck ine
on : , a ATLO on conse 3 ae i
. eg oa o at ae
NROBS OM PLAIN . TELETYPE. 2 aos serps ~)
< ise -§ Sant
4:39PM NITEL 4/24/75 RRH om aES Spee. inv. ot
a ia Traini “06; $
a Legal Coual Bets yt
ro ‘DIRECTOR (137-33264) Thy.4 cael Cone FA
m jrectar See's :
“lit S. MINNEAPOLIS (157-1458) <7 “dy |S
FROM? OMAHA (178-231) (P) _ Ye
2 Comp herb Ler NG
FORMER MP 4145-E. Se oe ney ;
ON APRIL 24, 1975, AUSA KEITH E. UHL, ADVISED HE A, 7 Ven, \
RECEIVED TELEPHONE CALL FROM SUBJECT RELATING SUBJECT ff
. . ° C8 ei
HAD BEEN CONTACTED. BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE OFFICE Bet)
. 7 Li
OF SENATOR -FRANK CHURCH, WASHINGTON, D.C., REQUESTING a \
Co, 5
HIS PRESENCE IN WASHINGTON DURING WEEK OF APRIL 28, o~\
_ rs
.. 1975, FOR PURPOSE OF STAFF MEETINGS TO DETERMINE 3
» SUBJECT'’S POTENTIAL AS WITNESS BEFORE CHURCH | f-
. i.e
COMMITTEE INVESTIGATING OPERATIONS OF THE FBI. “He
P
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE FBI. 7
END. .
RSP FBIHQ
We a EN gai PE
t Tas, 7 33 nee ela wom tet Soh en nd
iF EE Ye Ete aitres Od, Lb be DBE
| NOT RECORDED ee
" FD IC SO SUN 111975 | a ..
= 44, - , ee Sa ccormminicnn,
wtb tididQFBos28 Page 4


FROM

Cd) 0 gat titer tern conrarnep Pion & Eval
SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75 ' HERELU LS UNCLASSIFIED Spec. tnv. —___
aot DATE | \A \o \ By SP-D.an Ae Training

|

S4 MAY? 1975
NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 5

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 5010-108

MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN, REG. NO. 27 .

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall
Asst. Dir:

Memorandum Levies J. AL Mintz 28

. Comp. Syst. ___
\

pateApril 22, 1975 Ext. Affairs —_

Files & Com. _
1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar
1 - Mr. A. L. Lacey
“a

3

Assoc. Dir.
Dep, AD Adm. —
Dep. AD Inv. __

Gen. Inv.
Ident.

is
ami
Intell. x

‘MR. W. 0. CR

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm.

The purpose of this memorandum is to record that
on 4/18/75 Mr. James Wilderotter, Associate Counsel to the
President, Executive Office Building, stated he had reviewed a
final copy of the Intelligence Division Position Paper on
Jurisdiction including Exhibit L, pages 36 and 37. Mr. Wilderotter
advised Bureau Supervisor Alonzo L. Lacey that The White House
interposed no objection to the Jurisdiction paper being furnished
to the Senate Select Committee,

Director Sec'y __

With reference to the study entitled Intelligence _
Division Position Paper on Jurisdiction, Mr. Wilderotter requested
that he be furnished a copy and this was done. In addition,
Wilderotter had previously on 4/4/75 reviewed the paper for
approval of the use of items concerning Presidential or National
Security Council interest.

ACTION :

For information and record purposes.
ALL: ekw

Gy NP J
1

eo

62-116395


a . 4 . ote

since President Roosevelt met Mr. Hoover immediately after returning from
an extended trip, a departure from his usual practice. There was no entry
on 8/25/36, other than the President's departure for the Dakotas at 10:40 p.m.

- “- - UNITED STATES . peeve * © “ Assce. Dire
, 1-Mr. J, A. Mintz ee
Memorandum 1-Mr.W.R. Wannall Asst Dir
1-Mr. W. QO. Cregar , one
omp. Syst, __
To pare; 4/1/75 Picea
1-Mr.A.B. Fulton Gen. inv.
a 1- Mr. A. L. Lacey, Jr Newt eo
FROM : Mr. W. R. Wannall Insee pet
“(b C Senslady a Me Gata
SUBJEC INNTELLIGENCE DIVISION POSITION PAPE] fA rein
; wD ON/AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT NATIONAL § SECURITY _ up Ticjhom Ran
ite INTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATIONS - ; Director Saeiy
j7 ” CS cecal yy R
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize investigativ N
' efforts to authenticate Hoover memoranda dated 8/24-25/36. KD. . £
7 - : ; >.
Document Section, FBI Laboratory, determined the type appearing Na
: ’ " -on Hoover memorandum dated 8/25/36 was prepared on a Remington typewriter
| 2 with an elite type used since October, 1935. Hoover memorandum to Tamm dated .
N= 9/10/36, was prepared on an IBM typewriter with pica-style type used since 1930. {
. ve
. S ; The letterhead used on both Hoover memoranda of 8/24-25/36 was aN)
1 ia authorized FBI stationery effective August 14, 1936. =
+ “2.
On 3/10/75, Mr. Donald B. Schewe, Assistant Librarian, Reference =
i Archives, Franklin D. Roosevelt Library, Hyde Park, New York, advised that 3
| The White House Ushers Appoizitment Book contained entries showing that Re
} _ on Thursday, August 24, 1936, from 9: 20 a.m. to 10:12 a.m., President c4
} Roosevelt met with Mr. Hoover in his residence at The White House prior to _
leaving for his office. Schewe pointed out that this meeting was significant
1

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN 1S UNCLASSIFIED
DATE_7- 7-00 BY 3906

On 4/2/75, review of Cordell Hull Papers, Library of Congress,
; reflected that a Desk Diary (container #68, folder #295, microfilm #88) of
Secretary Hull contained an entry on 8/25/36 that the Secretary had luncheon
: with the President between 1:00 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. (7 . .
i Tere

Detailed memorandum attached.

ACTION

a. EB 95+ ee

F NOF RECORDED S.~ Q- me
iMAY 2 1975 :

For information.

J
S ENCLOSURE

Maia. Aes

pub Sn BBE


NW 88296. Docld:32989628 Page 7

caer ee SE BEE Ae ae EE came ree a A neler
€

ee taeteniathe sirantanaaiivntinaoantrlemnntentel oemn me
‘

. Pp one

’ - Oh

on

ante mney AU Vege he poet actin sameness aR ME a te OIRAAROntL te Sbel aatn  pmaty,

“ ‘

LF

i

~ 3. H. Mortimer

_ FROM JOHN EDGAR HOOVER

ae _ The memoranda were returned to ‘SA Lacey. os °
RECOMMENDATION: 7 : te: wee

“) Intelligence Division, rer ete fy etag sang’:

CD My. Lacey _ : a : a

Men. pe

. of the type styles employed. The purpose of this investigation

-3 aaand den deh Am ean
: weed toe write the momerands were in use en the dates eppearing
On the memoranda. cen otis Closest ©:

Mr. White

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. TAMM

DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 19363
CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM BY my
| SOHN EDGAR HOOVER DATED AUGUST 253 2a

7 oe -

apy
23%. Qn this date, SA Alonzo L.° Lacey of the ‘Intelligence |

Division delivered the above-captioned memoranda to the Laboratory

with a request to determine the make of typewriter employed in

‘ the preparation of the memoranda and the date of introduction

“was to ascertain whether or not the type styles on the typewriters

we

-~ It was determined that the "Memorandum For Mr. Tamm
fron ‘John Edgar Hoover dated September 10, 1936" was prepared
on an IBM typewriter equipped + with a pica style of type which:
“has been in use since 1930. The typewriting comprising the
“Confidential Memorandum by Join Edgar Hoover dated August 25,
. L936" was determined to have been prepared on a Remington
typewriter equipped with an elite style of type that has been in
use since Ootober, 1935. _

ee oe wk weer
aie age

The result of this. examination be forwarded to the

~ Mr. Wannall
Mr. White

- Mr, Hortimer
- Mr. Oberg


5

s » *

. ’ .

a“ _* . ?
+ a_i 7
. :
a
a -
‘ By .

: Orrice of DirecTor
FEDERAL SUREZAU CF INVESTIGATION

sera pmeagenges

. Avorek T4.7O88
August 14,1938. : :

FEM RACER nd A OR NE ee Oe
«

wT . . ; “Mis Flacko

c

é
!
j
|
‘4
: of
:
H
i .
j .
2 rs
“ i .
. J: «
- . oe ails fang wa oot
oe . : CH PHP RE OR lide

ees - 7 ‘A ee ; .
a BUVEr nea GS e« _ . 7 ate darema s, 7,
Pee pa ct mnmtmmn ; Lin Jwctor :.

. aa _ ie Kickels

. % eo ; * Re Going.

. ee wt ae ‘
save Seuihicn
seaseeeenan,

ve . mo . ain. Tenia

. Tie. Treex

_ ; teelfee a6 j
RVR P vores trees i
SE Naa pemetnated

Joe eats
‘

_ _ ort a og Coo an .
¥ ” ” _ . . . -, . .

Pn ae Tae? Lapenaniltentadinianuse det oh semen”

aaron

ees
PCA ON

eee an ee ee

wee meg eT

GE

she Weg ie te ie

wre 3S

S apGar® ‘Vidovee - “
Patt os piRsToR + Jd

i Velieeal “Hor: eeu ae ie Fusientigatts tt

United States Bepartunent at dhstice
_ '

Bas ting tart, 2. €,

he ft

a

ha
x

are
ira

lea diate Te ee
te o
f
qd

hy

tts
fs

oe
ve
.

ue
ve
5

2
1
MAA Be hee wh rae wee 05,
Sd te
'

Scena wees ween, wk ane en) Gon wong hoe pede
‘
R

Me nt ae ne ae OM A ee ti
1
,

62 “£6 3 IS ~

ENCLOSURE

a2 BEgTROY a - ES 9 bb Pan SIihs 2

i. as Lia he

NW 88296 Docid: 32989628 Page 9 :

4

1 ; .
;
i
t
:


poe

- a
I.
-
Lo
a
boo
|. .

eee wine ge BaP mar ade tet a
ee. ford ws. 1975.

prmmoe

RESEARCH CONDUCTED AT FRANKLIN D.
ROOSEVELT LIBRARY, HYDE PARK, NY
ON 3/10- 12/75

- On 3/10/74, Mr. DONALD Be | SCHEWE, Assistant

|‘ Librarian in the Reference Archives, Franklin D. Roosevelt
Library, Hyde Park, NY, was advised of our interest in ; so,
| locating any communications be@ring upon a conversation. 2. -
- between former President FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT and former ar rs
‘Secretary of State CORDELL HULL in the latter part of tho.

_ August, 1936. Mr. SCHEWE was advised that this conversation
“was concerned with the security of the US and that Mr. J.
EDGAR HOOVER of the FBI may have participated in this

_ -conversation. Mr. SCHEWE was also advised that Mr. ROOSEVELT
— | Stlegedly reduced the subject matter of above conversation
‘to a memorandum and that we were interested in locating -
this memorandum or some information bearing upon above :
conversation. Arrangements were made to meet with Mr. SCHEWE
.at the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library in Hyde Park, NY,”

_ on 3/12/75. Mr. SCHEWE indicated that in the meantime

‘ . ue wOUld conduct some research in this matter.

or a

‘

a ~ . “On 3/12/75, Mr. SCHEWE advised that he had
conducted some research relative to our telepnone call

on 3/10/75, and inquired if we could be more specific
with regard to the dates of the information desired.

“SCHEWE was advised that to the best of our Knowledge the

cs conversation we were interested in involving FRANKLIN D.

-ROOSEVELT (FDR),HULL and Mr. HOOVER, occurred on

approximately Joh. 26/36 and that the conversation concerned

the internal security of the US. moog

: Mr. SCHEWE, at. this point, fnrnished a Xerox
copy of a “buck slip" dated 8/24/36, (copy of which is

attached) on White House stationery, classified "Confidential

and addressed to the Secretary of State from FDR".

_ Mr. SCHEWE stated that "buck slips" are nothing more

than a cover memorandum utilized to transmit communications

- which are attached thereto. It is to be noted that this

"buck slip" indicates that attached to it was a memorandum
‘for the Secretary of State, unsigned, undated and
recommending coordination of activities of all agents”

. of the Government in foreign countries. SCHEWE advised

~ . - wen WL8s gee
meee ol, S39 _mucuosune -
BE 2B ISSR he aa

i NW?-882796 Docld: 32989628 Page 10

ee ee et te oh
,
é
*

7 z
peaneemaneiry sam estate


|
|

= + HULL was there. Mr. SCHEWE advised that

| NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 11 = ss

that the. ‘synopsis of this memorandum which<appears on>

the "buck slip” was the usual practice at that time to
qdentify the documents attached to it. SCHEWE added-

that this was the only document he was able to locate -

which may-have some bearing on the desired information.
SCHEWE stated that the possibility exists that the. _
referred to memorandum may be located among the collection |
of papers of CORDELL HULL which are now stored at the
library of Congress, Washington, D.C.

Mr. SCHEWE then exhibited to interviewing personnel
the White House Ushers Appointment Book which was
hand-written and kept on a daily basis. This appointment
pook contained the following pertinent information:

- 2 >. Phursday, August 13, 1936, at 9:50 AM
+5 -.BDR departed the White House for a visit
_'., to the flood areas in NY, Ohio and Pennsy1-
. . wania. Ld

Thursday, August a4, 1336, FDR returned:
to White House at Q: us AM,

“. 9:20 AM FDR met with Mr. HOOVER from

ve” > 9220 AM to 10:12 AM. ge bese S

i ce oh

' ° (Note * - There is no entry in ‘this book
[+ for Aug. 24, 1936, indicating that Mr.

.. it is interesting to note that. FDR met
*. Mr. HOOVER in his residence in the White
House on 8/2h 1/36, prior to leaving for
"  . ! Kis office in the White House. SCHEWE
-' ° also pointed out-that this meeting was :
‘-:. gignificant since FDR. met with Mr. HOOVER
on 8/2/36, immediately after returning ~~
from an extended trip. This, according
_ to SCHEWE was a departure from FDR's
usual practice,

. ; There was no record in the White House -
Usher's Appointment Book for 8/25/36, which would indicate
that FDR met with either Mr. HULL or Mr. HOOVER on that
date, This book indicates that FDR departed the White
House on Tuesday, 8/25/75, at 10:40 PM for a trip to the
draught areas, in upper. Maine. South Dakota and North

. . . . 3 = ..f .
. . . 7 eo ee ~
. - . ‘ . . so : "

sates caer
A

ey

-

. a’
eee
‘ 4

a

t

+

aus
ast

a

ote
?

AN pe sete fe A te eT

2" “et 1200 PM.
Se . Mr. SCHEWE furthe

: Dakota, as
" ... return to the Wh
"" at 10:02 AM.

: oo. The White H
_- further reflects thet FDR, during
+ 1936, to Aug. 10, 1936,

. @ampaigning.
_. , 8/10/35, and remaine
again departed on a trip and retu
FDR also departed from the White

“ and returned on 9/6/36.

2. GRACE TULLY
reflects a
'. of this appointment book fails

or had an appointment with Mr.
during the period 8/13/36 to 9
-appointment book

~

FDR returne

couse Usher

does reflect

2

was away

well as a visit to Mt. Rushmore.
ite House until Sunday, Sept.

i" Ty “Me, SCHEWE also produced to interviewing
personnel the appointment book of FDR's
for the pertinent period.

ll of FDR's office appointments.
to reflect that FDR met

HOOVER in his office
/6/36.
that during this period
ting with CORDELL HULL’ on 8/25/36;

r advised that

‘"ppR did

's Appointment Book

the period July 10,

not

6, 1936,’

from the White House

a to the White House on
d there until 8/13/36, when he

rned on 8/24/36.
House on 8/25/36;

private

However, this .

_ - “reviewed the following and was unable to locate any

8 did have a mee
'

-

- i: 5: 8.) Papers ke
| White House safe. .
Poon 3.) Papers k
i file. : ;
. . . hy Papers kept in F
‘ ; maintained by his secretary...

. .
7st - ya
Pr ren

wae nen to aihg

LNW 88296 Docid:32989628

1.) Papers kept in FDR's safe.

6.) J. EDGAR HOOVER's file.

.
e

Page 12

pt by his secretary ‘in

5.) ‘Individual agencies filés.

secretary,
This appointment book
A review

he personally
. . documents or references which could possibly’ shed some
7 light on the matter of interest to us:

a separate
ept in FDR's official presidential

DR's alphabetical file


4 of ° - “ ’ fc
fea wee. . . . . aan “ ‘
ee! wt ee . oa oo. o oe
* er few” na et, . feet -
“fe yt iow wae ho aS a 2 ae ore ae fae te y
ra avy . wea af oe woe tere! Pes ett a
; ale a : . 4 «? °
eh ey ett . oa write
ae ak a Lo Ss Se att : .
a aes * LR S Ge Seek eon Lo eatin oe betes ate ten . aay
: ones . ate 7 le ne oe
. - : SUES ee
. zoe : 5

vod
:

po al) Attorney Geherdt's tile. 0.
" 8.) Assistant Attorney General's file.

oe) 07, Qe) National Security file.
ES : a
i " 10.) ‘Internal Security file.

21.) FBI file. a

{

i

{

_—

pers Tn conclusion; Mr..SCHEWE stated that after
--.: peviewing all of the atore data, he concluded that the

... ‘pertinent document of interest to us is not at the FDR

Library at Hyde Park, NY. SCHEWE added that if any

.- guch document is at the Library, it is misfiled and
~ as there are approximately 21 million pages of manuscripts

“+ and documents at the Library, it would be impossible ;

Hs sto locate same. oo

Po og

pole Be _ ¥t is to be noted that on the enclosed

t=. “buck slip" there are four penciled notations, i.e.

.°285-c, X20, X285 and X67. SCHEWE stated that these

fee . . notaions are part of the FDR Library cross-reference

/ hc system.  SCHEWE added that he checked these referencce

cee and could locate nothing further regarding the matter

jo- +» of -interest to us. SCHEWE stated that these references

i -pertained to the enclosed "buck slip”. so

pot 0 3 ; . . ; - .
Posse vey a}

4 . ao - ; oS "s 2. 7
af 7 *. . : .
| aan - alte
“tf . a
ifs oe, ; ee:
er ee foo, mor,
| INW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 13 -°  ”

THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON

Auguat 24, 19358.

- find this an my 2ile,
* “gating | beck tro ‘months. As I

understand it everybody 4s

"agreed on 3% , i. What 45 the next

step? q

| Memo. from State, unsigned and undated, recomnend-
; ding coordination of activities of ali agents of the
. govt. in foreign countries: eech agency as it ia
related to the others, and all in their relation
to the State De partments makes 9 recomaoniations
of | of coordination.


q

é

cf NR 003 AX CODE
\
if
" TO DIRECTOR (62-116395)

11:43PM NITEL MAY 3, 1975 WMM

te

MAY 0} er +) Inspection,
FROM ALEXANDRIA (62-NEW) (P) vie intelli Tae
ae on Laboratory ——-—
O Hiden RE Pian. & Eval. —.

— ae Spec. Inv.
16 Training _
SENSTUDY 75 Ob Legal Conn.
. marlon COND Telephone Rm. —
tT g UCLA $ ory (Ae Director Sec’y —_

a a -
ws a gl see
RE BUTEL MAY 2, 1975.2 a Me

. ie

Assoc. Dir.

Asst, Dir.:
Admin. —.

Dep.-A.D.-Adm......
Dep.-A.D.-Inv.....

Comp. Syst. ——
Ext. Affairs .—
Files & Com. ——
Gen. Inv. +.
Ident. —-.__..

FORMER BUREAU AGENT WILLIAM P. GEORGE, 6502 GOLF COURSE SQUARE, H

ALEXANDRIA, VA., CONTACTED MAY 2,
CONTACTED BY STAFF OF SENATE OR HOUSE COMMITTEES,

1975 AND STATED THAT IN EVENT HE IS”

HE MAY REFUSE TO BE

INTERVIEWED, BUT IF HE CONSENTS TO BE INTERVIEWED HE WILL REQUEST

PRESENCE OF FSI AGENT, IF QUESTIONS ARE ASKED RELATIVE TO SENSATIVE

TO BUREAU OPERATIONS.
pepeeeaalien a
INQUIRY AT RESIDENCE OF HAROLD P. LEINBAUGH,
DRIVE, MC LEAN, VA., ON MAY 2,
ee

1160 WIMBLEDON 5°

1975, REVEALS THAT HE IS PRESENTLY AT

CLES MEDITERRANEAN, HOTEL CARAVELLE, ST. ANNE, GUADALUPE, FRENCH

INDIES.

ish,
“"
Vv

poe TY Oe

REC. 106

raed
she

RETA men

BIB AUGH UPON HIS RETURN.

GRC
ah

Tt FBI WASH DC CLR ¢

8 aitik's

HE IS EXPECTED TO RETURN TO HIS RESIDENCE ON MAY

BUREAU IS REQUESTED TO ADVISE IF ALEXANDRIA SHOULD CONTACT j (
es ae

1B

2-16 275

wh

48 ” 7 IN 75

we

Ge

if if
syne

{

£

ben

———

we & »

/
IDEAS BURLAU OF 1AVESTINA TION
AMR 002 8A PLAIN COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
“1220PM URGENT MAY 3, 1975 BuD (MAY 03 1975 Gon et
q . wom ad Ident, .
' 10: DIRECTOR, FBI (62-116395) mepes podetice | inspect
y , FELEV VRE | Intel
FROM: BALTIMORE (62-NEW) : isinsiay —
Spec. Inv.
“ susrupy 75> | eet
Legal Coun...

ad ‘a
RE BUREAU TEL, MAY 2, 1975. / ) Telephone Rm, _.

LDirector See'y —.

DONALD G. HANNING, 18 OXFORD STREET, CHEVY CHASE,

MARYLAND, CONTACTED INSTANT DATE BY SAC, BALTIMORE. | » n hhnA
, AS LES
INSTRUCTIONS IN REFERENCED TELETYPE FOLLOWED. HANNING Cpa2
ae.

ADVISED HAD NOT BEEN CONTACTED BY ANY REPRESENTATIVE OF foo
THE SENATE OR HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEES TO DATE. ADVISED
WOULD CONTACT SAC, BALTIMORE SHOULD HE BE CONTACTED IN

THE FUTURE.

ENDDSS FBIH@ CCLR 4
B\aNy we g vi ;

PERSONNEL RECORDS UNIT

GUPY RETAINED I

MAY & o an
nit 296 Doe AM 329896; |


‘Assoc. Din, |
Dep.-A.D.-Adm_.. | .
Dep-A.D.-Inv.,
¢ Asst. Dir.:
7 Admin. .
# Comp. Syst. ~~ §

| an Davies BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 9

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

a \97 | xt. Affaire |
MAY 0 y 5 H Files & Com
\. } - i Gen. Inv.
‘ : i
| \/ TELETYPE i Inspection jf
of ¥ Entel, A
é mn f Laboratory (__
pe fe a te
NR 99 OM PLAIN oe Pd j ,Teeinine
. Se 4 OUT. f
7:00 PM CST URGENT MAY 2, 1975 SKH SS epe | Beleptions Ban — |
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI (62-116395) oe ol”
go ye
FROM: OMAHA (62-NEW) (P) oe (!
eewstupy 5 oe
wi!

0 eer rere as
RE BUREAU TELETYPE, MAY 2, 1975./7

FORMER SA JOHN J. QUINN WAS CONTACTED BY ME PERSONALLY
AND ADVISED PER INSTRUCTIONS IN RETEL. HE WAS APPRECIATIVE
OF ADVANCED NOTICE RE POSSIBLE INTERVIEW AND STATED THAT . a re
HE WOULD DESIRE AN AGENT BE PRESENT IF SUCH INTERVIEW —
OCCURS. STATED HE WOULD PERSONALLY CONTACT ME IF HE IS
CONTACTED BY STAFF MEMBERS.

BUREAU WILL BE KEPT ADVISED. Ft

b

END. REC- 106 lo mm) -/lo3 450 -

STey metasieiet ens iaesdlad

MAH FBIHQ ACK FOR ONE

YG MAY '7 1975

WA CRLR

~!

PERSONNEL RECORDS UNIT

COPY RETAINED IN

- P eGodd ANS: $8RBe28 Page 17

7 é 4

_ 5 6 2- Mr, S, F. Phillips
nO ane ,
seer et fie April 30, 1975

——
a
@
4
&

MATERTAL FOR SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC)
INVEST IGATING “INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

ce I che Sa oe tt EE

Nata |
~
va

ms]

—1l. TILPLS/SUBJECT: Policies and Procedures of the FBI
2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION: FBI

3. NATURE OF MATERIAL: Letterhead memorandum with
enclosures described below

4, DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified except for one _
enclosure which is classified "Secret,"

5. NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP: Shovld have

6. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS:

Following excerpts from the FBI Manual of Instructions:

(a) Table of Contents.

(b) Preface. Guidelines for FBI Investigations.
(c) Seetion 36. Espionage (classified "Secret").
(d) Section 84. Registration Act.

(e) Section 86. Sabotage.

(£) Section 87. Investigations of Subversive 7
Organizations and Individuals. A

(gs) Section 88. Sedition. REC- 106 Yaoi ' £3

(h) Section 95. Treason. ty Kye r
(i) Section 97. Voorhis Act. G2. f / ue fo A G5

assoc. Dies (j) Section 122, Extremist Matters and Civil

poe ee Unrest. tS MAY '7 1975
Asst. Dir:

finns Also, Table of Contents of the FBI Manual of Rules” """"
Ev Afters And Regulations,

Files & Com. ._

Gen. Inv.

Ident. )

nsrvstion —SEP zoek ane J SEE NOTE PAGE TWO

ns a ee

Laboratory tory (4) \ ) : 9)

Plon. & Eval, — € . ws

Spec. Inv. wr vat

Training € if .
Lego! Coun, ¢ .
Dunster Seat yn p WANG ROOM (J TELETYPE unit (J GPO s46546

hocld:32989628 Page 18

a 3

Material furnished includes policy, statutes,
instructions and related matters covering FBI investigations
in the security ficld generally. Limited, extremely sensitive
material excluded but available for réview by appropriately
eleared personnel of the SSC Staff at FBI Headquarters.

7. aOQUESTER/DATE OF REQUEST: ssc. 3/19/75

8. RELEASING AUTHORITY: FBI

9. DATE OF SUBMISSION: 4/7/75

10. LOCATION OF FILE Copy: FBI file 62-116395-75
11. RELATION TO INTELLIGENCER COMMUNITY PROBLEMS:

, No direct relation,

NOTE: Original via liaison to Central Community Index
in connection with Senstudy 75.

88296 Docid:32989628 Page 19

“”
od

Routing Slip

0%ggReyv.“b2-17-73)

TO: SAC:

t
(Copies «.. Checked)

~

([} Albany (C} Houston (J Oklahoma City a BecAT:
[J Albuquerque [[] Indianapolis {([] Omaha (1) Bern
(_j Alexandria (_] Jackson (CJ Philadelphia Bonn
{_] Anchorage (] Jacksonville Phoenix (_j Brasilia
(C1 Atlanta [_] Kansas City (j Pittsburgh [1 Buenos Aires
(_] Baltimore [ Knoxville C] Portland (] Caracas
(_] Birmingham ([_] Las Vegas (_] Richmond (_] Hong Kong
(_] Boston {—) Little Rock (L) Sacramento £) London
C] Buffalo f[-] Los Angeles (CJ St. Louis [_] Madrid

Butte [—) Louisville C] Salt Lake City (_] Manila
L_} Charlotte (J Memphis ({) San Antonio [=| Mexico City
(| Chicago C] Miami [-] San Diego Ottawa
(_] Cincinnati [_] Milwaukee (] San Francisco ([) Paris
| Cleveland (_] Minneapolis San Juan (] Rome
(_] Columbia (©) Mobile {_] Savannah (J Singapore
() Dallas (L) Newark ([) Seattle {-] Tel Aviv
([] Denver (CJ New Haven (_] Springfield [-] Tokyo
{_] Detroit (_] New Orleans C1] Tampa
(_) El Paso C] New York City ([] Washington Field
{__] Honolulu (] Norfolk [-] Quantico

Date 5/8/78

RE SENSTUDY 75

(_] For information [7] optional

(J The enclosed is for your information. If used in a future report, (7] conceal all
sources, [_] paraphrase contents.

Retention

zg) action

“Peasomar Arn *

He

For appropriate

((] Enclosed are corrected pages from report of SA

dated

Remarks:

([] Surep, by

Attached should be brought to the attention
ef Assistant Legat Armand Cammarota. For

his information, the SSC has exhibited an
interest. in Bureau's communications to
Rome in 1964 and is aware Cannerota. yas

He thus may begeontacted

then Legat there.
by SSC personnel. 6

may
Ene. ot xh “f °
Bufile G2@L16395 a ey P ¥
Urfile Wass em S f s

NW 88296 Docld: saoasseste 20


k -
afr OPTIOF FORM NO, 10 5010=106

MAY 1982 EDITION

GSA GEN. HS. NO, 27 g

“-

“he

] UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT iie:
ra is ~
Memorandum hfe
Admins -
no, Comp. Syst.
to : MR. CALLAHAN pare: | 2/7/75. Ew Airs —
4 Gen, Inv. a
rrom ; Je B, ADAMSO,2fL Femoele BS en
C= pass clone rE.
Hee i aborator:
/ 1 : cai fig eee Spon Pion & Eval os
SUBJECT, * SENSTUDY 975 4 Aste Spoc. Inv. — ca
meres eae ae pare 1114 Ty me oi
ewe Leg ,

A

ANN

88296 Docid:32989628 Page 21

TelebHene Rm.

On 2/6/75 Mr. Kelley and I met with Senator Church
and Bill Miller, Staff Director of the Senate Select Committee.
Senator Church pointed out that he intended to run the Committee i
avery responsible manner, had no intention of destroying or impairing
the effectiveness of the intelligence community and, in fact, hoped that
the efforts of the Committee would help to reestablish public confidence
in the intelligence agencies.

Parameters have not been drawn but Senator Church feels that iY
the Committee will confine its activities largely to inquiries into domestic ‘ Ag tf !
activities. The inquiries will be designed to determine whether agencies *~'-
have acted outside the law and the type of remedial legislation necessary +
to prevent such abuses in the future.

Study will be largely concerned with the activities of the Central
Intelligence Agency but will, of course, involve the FBI and other agencies
involved in domestic ‘intelligence.

The Committee hopes to have a nonpartisan staff of approximately
40 employees headed up by Mr. Miller and would appreciate having necessary
background investigations expedited to permit an early clearance. Miller
indicated he has already been in touch with Mr. Hotis and Mr. Bowers in
this regard. It was explained that the contemplated procedure involved the
FBI conducting the full-field investigation necessary with the results being
furnished to the Chairman, after which he would, upon being personally
satisfied as to their loyalty, furnish the results to CIA for final clearance.
Senator Church appeared satisfied with this arrangement. He stated that
he wanted to prevent leaks and be hopefully as successful as the Judiciary
Committee was on the impeachment inquiry. Our experience in this regard
was pointed out wherein Judiciary Committee in comect a with the 17
wiretaps had written te aller indicating that if we ma ¢ clasgitt os

Rec 68 (2 ou OM of of al

JBA:ams (8)
1 - Mr. Jenkins 1- Mr. Mintz OREERLORE ees,
1 - Mr. Cleveland 1 - Mr. Wannall
1 - Mr. McDermoit 1 - Mr. Hotis
7 4975

Memorandum for Mr. Callahan
Re: SENSTUDY 1975

information available they would afford it appropriate security restricted
to members only, excluding staff, and would not make the information
public, Subsequent to the hearings, the Committee published its report
which contained our classified documents right along with the Top Secret
classifications. Senator Church was not aware of this, appeared surprised
by it, and stated surely the information must have been declassified, I
advised him that not by us and it was our information.

Senator Church was asked whether in his opinion the formation
of the Select Committee would have any effect on the proliferation of
committees seeking to obtain testimony from the FBI and it was his opinion
that this would have a favorable effect. He said he had been in touch with
other members of the Senate who felt that it was a waste of time to have
repetitious testimony on the same subject matter before a variety of
committees and he had the feeling that the other committees would hold off
until after the Senate Select Committee completed its hearings. He indicated
that he could not vouch for what would happen in the House, however, he
intended to speak to the House leadership in order to try to effect some
coordinated approach there also, because he was well aware of the large
number of committees seeking to provide oversight or obtain information
from the intelligence agencies. :

A question arose as to the extent. of cooperation with the Committee
and Senator Church was assured that the FBI would be completely responsive
subject to certain limitations which would have to be delineated by the
President in order to protect sensitive sources and information. Senator
Church indicated that he was going to talk to the President in this regard in
order to secure his complete cooperation, and it was Senator Church's feeling
that the Committee should be entitled to answers to any questions they might
ask without restriction other than, of course, the identities of informants.

He felt the progress of the Committee would be severely impaired if it were
necessary to go to Court over such questions to obtain enforcement of their
right to have access to whatever information they need.

ACTION: f

Information. af
BO
L- ie lod

NW 88296 Docid:22989628 Page 22


CODE TELETYPE NITEL
L-Mr. T.J.Jenkins 3/2/75
TO SACS ALL OFFICES 1 - Mr. J. B. Adams
1 - Each Assistant Director
FROM DIRECTOR FBI (62-116395) -
; - 1 - Me. W. 0. Gregar | /7
_ SENSTUDY 7 73, PERSONAL ATTENTION A '

CAPTIONED MATTER PERTAINS TO BUREAU'S HANDLING OF REQUESTS

in
HY

FROM SENATE AND HOUSE ' SELECT COMMITTEES TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL -

Mn Ai ane

Yo OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. IN

NE ; CONNECTION WITH WORK OF THESE COMMITTEES, STAFF MEMBERS MAY SEEK
Nt TO

Ks ANTERVIEW CURRENT AND FORMER FBI EMPLOYEES.

By

RECENTLY, THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (ssc) STAPF HAS

SALTO

HORE aN St gyn 9 eee
Ln ALSTR

UNRECORDED COPY FILED IN “~*~

E “SJ WVWERVIEVED SEVERAL FORMER EMPLOYEES AND IT Is aipescrviren |
222 THAT MANY MORE SUCH PERSONNEL WILL BE CONTACTED =
THE FBI HAS PLEDGED FULL COOPERATION WITH mg: COMMITTEE
AND WE WISH TO ASSIST AND FACILITATE ANY INVESTIGATIONS: UNDER-
TAKEN BY THE COMMITTEE WITH RESPECT TO THE FBI, HOWEVER, WE
DO HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO INSURE THAT SENSITIVE SOURCES AND
METHODS AND ONGOING SENSITIVE INVESTIGATIONS ARE FULLY ¢p&%
"oon A sim REC-MG = 4A - Aue we FD
‘oat aay CRW S174, SEE HOTERPAGH THOI975
Fit Aye —_———— ae
rain CORUNCATIONS SECTION

Intell,

Ident. FEDERAL BUREAU OF. JNVESTIGATION , hyn ! a) 4
a \ : oo) aa,
2 1

Laboratory

oan . Evel an of a J e zt a EROE . A
raining - De . “rs - NS .

Le En FoR HEL. VpE f ae "Binns 1 1995 7 i ! a

Telephone Rm, ‘-; ‘ —

Director Sec'y cd : en sted ae TELETYPE UNIT A Gro oy

NW 88296 Docld:32989028 Page 23

sntectere-erge-rieentee . d


. 1 q
on m
se

.
a“

SE od

TELETYPE TO ALL orfbzs
RE:: SENSTUDY 75
62+116395
PROTECTED, SHOULD ANY FORMER EMPLOYEE CONTACT YOUR OFFICE AND
HAVE ANY QUESTION REGARDING HIS OBLIGATION NOT TO DIVULGE INFOR-
MATION OBTAINED BY VIRTUE OF HIS PAST FBI EMPLOYMENT, HE SHOULD
BE INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT LEGAL COUNSEL, FBIHQ, BY COLLECT CALL.
YOUR CONVERSATIONS WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES MUST BE IN KEEPING WITH
OUR PLEDGE, IT IS BELIEVED SUCH A PROCEDURE WOULD INSURE PROPER
PROTECTION AND ALSO FACILITATE THE WORK OF THE SSC.
THE ABOVE PROCEDURE ALSO APPLIES TO CURRENT EMPLOYEES
OF YOUR OFFICE. HOWEVER, CONTACT WITH THE LEGAL COUNSEL SHOULD
BE HANDLED THROUGH THE SAC.
\

NOTE: Teletype prepared for all offices to alert SACS to
the possibility former employees may contact their offices seeking
guidance.

The Office of Legal Counsel in response to requests from
former employees will utilize the briefing paper prepared by the

Intelligence Community Staff of the Director of Central

Intelligence and concurred in by Assistant Attorney General
Antonino Scalia. ‘

NW 86296 Docid:22989028 Page 24


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 5010-106

MAY 1962-EDITIGN
GSA'GEN. REG. NO. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

\ \ yy

o 86 CMR. W. OR. WANA

@

1 - Mei. Wennatl
1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar
1 - Mr. E. W. Larson, Jr.

\ DATE: May 1, 1975

1 - Me. L. F. Schwartz

f
FROM :MR. W. O}\PRECAR 1 - Mr. S. F, Phillips

Assoc. Dir.
Dep. AD Adm. __
Dep. AD Inv. —

Asst. Dir.:
Admin.
Comp. Syst. —_
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com. —
Gen. Inv.
Ident.
Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory

Plon. & Eval. —
Spec. Inv.

Training

Oo
suaject:SENSTUDY 73)
Te eee RE LE
This memorandum for record purposes reports Direct Sects
discussion 4/25/75 between Bureau's Liaison Agent,,L. F. Schwartz,
and-Mr. Jack E, Thomas, Chief, Coordination Staff, Intelligence
ommunity Staff, relating to Abstracts we are to prepare for the
\Central Community Index (CCT) in connection with Senstudy 75.

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. __

Attached are (1) memorandum 4/11/75 re CCI and its
(, attachments, memorandum 4/10/75 and Abstract format; and (2) letter
4/21/75 from Thomas to Schwartz and its attachment, Abstract format.
On 4/25/75 Schwartz and Thomas discussed applicability of
instructions in attachments and arrived at the following under-
standings.

fy
nik =

ALL LuPORMATION CONTA

HEBEL

The FBI will provide Abstracts only, not documents, —,
to have on record in the CCI a summary of what we have furnished
to the Select Committees, Abstracts should be dated when typed
without regard to delivery date of Abstract or date of communi-
cations to which they pertain. Under item number nine of format,
enter date of communication involved, not date it is delivered
to a Select Committee, We may use an abbreviated version for
the Select Committees’ names, such as "Senate Select Committee."

We will title Abstracts as near as possible in a manner keyed to
the language of the request from the Select Committee. Inasmuch
as we will honor only written requests from the Select Committees,
the ''Requester™ will always be shown as the name of the requesting
Committee and not the name of any Committee personnel.

ACTION: None. For information and reco BIG 3
RD

imma Siiendne

)

|
Ri

~

62116395 7
REG.39
Enclosures
SFP:ekw yo.
(6) aan
xO \v ,

OF ay
8 & MAY 6 4975

NW 862796 Docld:327989628 Page 25


THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
; WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505

11 April 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR: Principals of the USIB Ad Hoc Coordinating ;
Group on Congressional Reviews ny

Inspector General, CIA

SUBJECT Central Community Index

ry

1. The central indexing capability detailed in the
attached memorandum has been implemented. Format for
preparation of abstracts has been accepted and the Community
Index is ready to receive material. The address of the

Community Index is wt
uF

Room 6E25 fr
CIA Headquarters y

Langley, Virginia 20505.

2. The timeliness of reporting to the Central Index is
critical and you are requested to make this information
available to the appropriate organizational components

within your agencies.

Sincerely,

#

John M. Clarke
Associate Deputy to the DCI

“

= Ny for the Intelligence Community
oN
m~ i Attachment
3 7 wet
a PIA “A
a (o¥

can
,

woe

9H, YAO we
SV

f
if

ENCLOSURE,

» Docid:32989626 Page 26


THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505

10 April 1975 _ - _noeth

negeaoes gers re TRATED

oot salle
MEMORANDUM FOR: USIB Principals ~

SUBJECT: Community Aspects of Inputs to Congressional
Committees Investigating Intelligence

}

1. The Intelligence Community Staff, with John M. Clarke,
Associate Deputy/IC, as my representative in these matters, will
keep the Board and other appropriate officials advised as to
progress of the investigations conducted by the Senate and House

- Select Committees investigating intelligence activities. In particular,

it will ensure that we are kept informed as to materials which are
formally being provided to the Select Committees by all elements

of the Community. The USIB Ad Hoc Group will assist on this

matter and provide the mechanism for regular and constant communi-

- cations.

2. In response to this assignment, the Intelligence Community
Staff is establishing a registry for documentation relating to the
investigations. This registry will be a source of reference of all
responses, testimony, et cetera,’ provided by USIB agencies and
available to your designated representatives,

3. In order to make the registry useful to the Board, it is

” essential that it include:

a. File copies of documents or other materials which
each Intelligence Community element provides to one of the
Select Committees where the originating agency considers
the materials to involve aspects of Community activities,
and/or which may result in follow-on queries concer ning: te te
the functioning* of the’ Corhmunity. The availability of thigwn : wae et
documentation will be ‘OF: “par ticular importance if it is” st to
expected theré will be sabscquent inguiries ‘relating ‘to the a
materials provided and involving elements of the Cornmanity
other than the originating element.

a

s

| NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 27 ;


b. An abstract of each formal input to a Select
Committee - unless the Intelligence Community registry
‘is provided with an actual copy of the material itself,
A proposed format for such abstracts is attached.

Ce

W. E. Golby

Attachment:
As stated

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 28

me Pi . . *  ) ; . }
FORMAT FOR ABSTRACT TO BE SUBMITTED TO
USIB AD HOC COORDINATING STAFF REGISTRY

MATERIAL FOR THE SENATE (HOUSE) SELECT COMMITTEE
‘ INVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

1. TITLE/SUBJECT:

2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION:

3. NATURE OF MATERIAL: (Report, briefing,. chart, etc.)

h, DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION:

5. NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP (YES/NO)

6. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: (Brief narrative statement
describing content, problems addressed and any conclusions or .
recommendations. Summary should clearly convey basic thrust of
whatever was provided to the Select Committee.)

| ' 7. ° DATE OF REQUEST:

| 8. RELEASING AUTHORITY:
9. DATE OF SUBMISSION:
10. LOCATION OF. FILE COPY:

ll. ‘RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS. (Identify)

TB ee

: x :
: ~ '

okt
AN Me
“ghee

SO,

Naaakrr rrr rer teeeenennenenenprae ter pan cee meena ae nee meer

‘
‘ . boot at
es eevee nena nearer eng A HE Ew

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 29


i

“oS
ms

~—

ut

Vey

wy

W, Or +
SEFe RW

the

tay
iy
‘

pee f
’ %
~ . E

Ad Hee Steff

THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505

Intelligence Community Staff 21 April 1975 “he CY YK b

‘ wf
JP af NW
ae! fon \
Mr. L. Frank Schwartz L CW Ly ly
Federal Bureau of Investigation BV

re 1 jt
Room 4637 . agit es ND yp
J. Edgar Hoover Building BE GEL Seis
Washington, D. C. Eau Bu) 313 & CoS ~, + pa.mnl

Dear Frank:

Reference is your request for comments on the sample
abstracts prepared in the FBI as a report on materials being
provided to the Senate Select Committee.

As you know, we want to make the Community Registry as
complete a record as possible of what is provided to the
Committee, and for this reason hope that the actual COPY om or
special reports and partie tant document

pro e he Registry. Where this is not doné, an eect

or summary ~s# each document or homogenous set of documents .

We have amended the abstract format slightly to include
an entry for "Document Classification." A copy of the
amended format is enclosed.

Your sample abstracts require a few alterations to make
them more "indexable."

a. Item 1, "TITLE/SUBJECT" refers to the subject
matter of the material which is being provided. The
abstract on the FBI Manual of Instructions should have
an entry here something like “Instructions covering FBI
Investigations in the Security Field," rather than the
title of the Senate Committee.

b. The date at the head of the page should be
the date of preparation of the abstract. The date of
submission to the Committee is listed at Item 9.

Cc. The entry "ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION" identified
the organization with authority to release the document.

- pre i

ry
7a

ee

(ENELOSURY

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 30 U OH ~f{/C- 5 iY, 5 — Gh


7? @
“ @

d. The "SUMMARY OF CONTENTS" section should
be brief, but also should clearly indicate what is
being provided to the Committee. I wonder, for
instance, whether your sample on the letterhead
memoranda was issued in widely separated time periods.
The summary as written gives no indication as to
the particular subject of any of the memoranda and the
Single sentence now used to describe all of them covers
the waterfront.

e. If the request for information comes officially
from the Committee, the Committee title should be entered
under "REQUESTOR," but if the requestor is an individual
member of the Staff, his name should be indicated.

f. The last entry in the format, "PROBLEM AREAS,"
has particular significance since it is important to
know if there are Third Agency, or sources and methods,
or other sensitivity problems involved, and this is
the place to identify them. We are beginning to use
the abstracts prepared in our office as an aid to
obtaining release clearance when we are dealing with
the document for which another agency must concur in
the release. The "PROBLEM AREAS" section gives such
other agency an idea as to whether we see any important
reason why they should be concerned about release of
the document. The entry in this final section of the
format is expected to prove useful for this purpose.

5. One copy of the document or its abstract is all

that is needed by the registry.

6. The mailing address of the registry is:

Community Index

Room 6625

CIA Headquarters

Langley, Virginia 20505

EF han

ck E. Thomas
Chief
Coorfination Staff, ICs

Enclosure: as stated

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 31

oes wamucall  «
_. FORMAT FOR ABSTRACT TO BE SUBMITTED TO
USIB AD HOC COORDINATING STAFF REGISTRY

MATERIAL FOR THE SENATE (HOUSE) SELECT COMMITTEE
INVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

1. TITLE/SUBJECT:

2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION: “

3. NATURE OF MATERIAL: (Report, priefing,. chart, ete.)

4. © DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION:

5. NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION STAMP (YES/NO)

6. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: (Brief narrative statement
describing content, problems addressed and any conclusions or
‘recommendations. Summary should clearly convey basic thrust of
‘whatever was provided to the Select Committee. )

7. DATE OF REQUEST: .

8. RELEASING AUTHORITY:

9. DATE OF SUBMISSION: . ;

| 10. ° LOCATION OF FILE COPY:

il. RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY .PROBLEMS’. . (Identify)

NW 88296 Docld:329696028 PageJ2 9 __ .: . we -


ey

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Assoc. Dir.

. Dep. AD Adm.

| ) Memorandum | are me
Admin.

; ) : ‘ya Comp. Syst.

‘TO :MR. W. R. WANNALLS(! Ope pate: April 21, 1975 Ext. Afltrs —
Gen. Inv.

Ident.
FRom :MR. W. olfnaar 1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips inion —

8

iii

4
88

Co
suBjEcT; SENSTUDY 75

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 q 5010106 -—_ . .
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27 7 -

4 LV Laboratory
(a Plan. & Eval,
Spec. Inv. —_.

Training
Legal Coun.

4 at
a : 1
On Thursday, 4/17/75, Mr. James Wilderotter, Pirector Sec'y —
Associate Counsel to the President for Congressionail Inquiries,
was furnished the following four documents with a request that
he advise whether copies of such doctiiéiits could be made available
to the Senate Select Committee: (1) An internal FBI memorandum
dated 5/16/72 captioned "FBI Jurisdiction, Criminal Intelligence
Information''; (2) An internal FBI memorandum dated 5/18/72 captioned
“FBI Authority in Domestic Intelligence Matters"; (3) A study
on subversion prepared for former Acting FBI Director L. Louis
Patrick Gray IIT dated 5/19/72; (4) A memorandum from the Director
of the FBI to the Attorney General dated 8/7/73 recommending the
issuance of an Executive Order concerning the conduct of domestic
intelligence investigations,

On 4/18/75 Mr. Wilderotter advised Section Chief ~—
William 0. Cregar that the above four documents were cleared -
for delivery to the Senate Select Committee.

ACTION: For information and record purposes,

WOC:ekw eRe

62-116395

CP Ug edgy Y)

296 Docld:32989628 Page 33

Telephone Rm,

‘ 1 - Mr. J. B. Adams
1 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

The Attorney General April 28, 1975

Mr. W. R. Wannall

Director, FBI
- Me. W. O. Cregar

ao
mie
)

ae) tee i - Mr. Se G, Deegan nm .
U. S. SEVATE SELECT COLMITTTEE. TO 1 - Mr. S, F, Phillips a
STUDY GOVERDMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH ay .
RESPECT TO INTELLIGEACE ACTIVITIES (SSC) fo
: 7 _ Se
Enclosed for your information is the original of a ~
memorandum concerning an interview by a Staff Member of ~

captioned Committee of retired FBI Special Agent Lish Whitson, <.,
A copy of the memorandum is also enclosed for your use in the
event you desire to furnish it to Mr. James A. Wilderotter,

8
Associate Councel to the President. §
tnelowures - 2 ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED
Oo HEREIN [S UNCLASSIFIED
62-116395 DATE 2 0-47 B 3

1;- 100106670 (Martin Luther King, Jr.)
1. 67-29405 (Personnel File Former SA Lish Whitson)

° ‘ * O
/ Gp a”, REG BIS
h

“ L
holes Ce / _
ray * [ iy an .
fuse roy, if “fd '
af '
. { _
de mame j
“ . 4
EXTith SB MAY 2 1975 |
ASsoc. Dir, : _ taba “ ¥ . oo : 2 «le |
Dep. AD Adm. _ 1 ogg , J ,
Dep. AD Inv. os : ~
Asst. Dir, . a
Admin. en tT ee

Inspeeti fon —7)
Intell, -
Lebor ratory

Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv.
Training

1
Comp. Syst. ‘ | ! ' :
Ext. Affairs \ “os ae 7
Files & Com. — Yo, ¥ pete in be / if
Gen. Inv, a rt - { }
BES wsypofy Mer PG

Legal Coun, {

[Telephone Rm. 5 6 MA) 0 8 Jf :
{Director Sec'y ___ MAIL ROOM T E UNIT [_) GPO 954-545

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 34


4 le e

1 - Mr. J. B, Adams
1 “ Mr. J. A. Mintz
i - Mr. W. R. Wannall

ALLINFORMATION CONTAINED =
62-116395 J FREINIS UNCLASSIFIED SpF#L 28, 1975

DATE 2 = 2041 BY SEA Omis, ~ Mc. W. 0. Cregar

1+ Mr. J. G. De
U.S, SHITE SUIT CUMTEE TO oe. Sw

STUDY COVDMIRITAL OPIRATIOIS WITH Phillips
RESPECT YO ITELLICESCE ACTIVITIES (SEC)

Rh: EQQGRVIET OF RETIRED FBI

SPECIAL AGEST (SA) BY Ssc
STALE KEMBER

Eat out belawr ia information available te the FEI
concerning captioned ratter,

£8C Intervicy of Rotired FRE SA Lizh Uhit:ion

On the afternoon of forll 25, 1975, Me. Lich Uhic:on
por.onaliy appeared at the office of an FBI official, tated
that he had jurt been interviewed by He. Michacl Epstein,
Staff Member of the SSC, and tas desiroux of reporting the
ecult. of that intervies uhnich Uhitcon related ac follous:

Epetein fiest acked Vhitcon vhen he entered the

PDI, when he first arrived for avslisment at FDI Headquarters,

to which Hendquarters Divi:ion he had been assioned, ond when he

wetincd. (FBI veeord: reveal that Thit<on joined the FSI as
an SA Sevembor 20, 1933, and retired Jume 19, 1972. He was
auctioned at Headquarters: Eeeember 16, 1941, attached to the
Porma tle Intelligence Divicion and cerved in that Divicion
until hi retirement. The current name for thar Divi. toni:

assoc. ov, antellicence Bivi.ion}. Ep.tein then teld Uhition that he

or ap Adm ericn7 that Vhitcon bad at ond tims: rmolled a packare to

aston. Lec. Martin inther King from Tampa, Florida, and avked Whit: on

Adnin. En YoLate the doetall: concorming thi: matter. Vhitson therouson

Comp, Syst.

Ident. \

oo4s 2
Jy:

Inspection \ a
intelt.__ SEP s ek ( VWs y) .

aboratory a nK ¥ te
Leboratry —€1. 1) Q NP S o> 5 SEE NOTE PAGE FIVE C
Spec, Inv. ete & - ]

Telephone Rm. _.

Director Sec'y_.  MAILROOME_] ‘TELETYPE unIT [J] GicLisut
_ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 35

GPO 954-545

ans — | G2-E ZF FO
ra


arr eUe! Pa 5, Aor OE i ray Ray vane EES hs Oe
UG, SOAT BOS? CEES WO LEOY GoAGR Ser TEAL

SU ARIBE e TONTTT TTA og SN ROT Ceo eeepc fewer
CORUACIO IG TORT BMCSoeY YO TER CKUES ASEVEPEes toes

cote Woagon Fs we Ro a A en re 8 ee a rd pe rites P x te
Ws TIC Ce RETRY TOL Senor, seme ¢ss) bY
crn | tek reer ae Sale
SEG SPARS Moe

ay

ted Upotedin that in tha Inte Commer of 164, forrer POL
aockotone te the eestor (Ntdien C. Sullivan hod teLophenat
“hitcon at his home onc Saturday and told him that Lato

EDI Viecetor Resver wanted Vindican te celiver a poche

to Ifo, Mlerida, by plano ond on arrival ot the [Nomi
cixport to telenhone Sulliven for further Inctructiens.
Vinbtcon did as dieceted ami upon calling, Sulliven, vas
inotructed to addracs the packare to be, lartin bother Rin.
ineorkinwty, Unitcon had the packase veiched, pst postage
ctemn: on Li, and addyessed £6 to Eatin huthor King Gast
Ure, Uartin iuthor Ries ac Uncbeln had Incdeated). The
Solloving cay, Sunlay, Woltcon flor hock fo Varhincten ant
on the next cey, Monday, he Informed Sullivan that his
inctruction: had been carried out. fullivan commentet to
TRRtcon “Dormiday £ will tell you about thar.*

Epctein ached Uhitcon whe had pakd for tha stance
to mail tho pachase ond Uhitecen caia that ho hed probably cana
0 wbiligin: per alien money. Epstein ached whether he had
put a return address on the packure and Undtsen replicd in
the nocotive, Lsstein ached if Valtcon Rad pone te the lWinmd
PRI Office, whether ony 4cent had met him ot the Mioni alrpore,
ani vhether Uhitcvoa had disewused this matter with anyanc.
Ubdtcon told Onctetn that he had not cono te the Ulami Office,
that no arent hai met hin, and that he Inu diseusced tho mitter
emily ulth fellivan, At thi.u paint, whltson aches Yestain Inv
ho cot tho ctery. Epstein merely Lauched anu did act ronly
to the quaction.

Hostein alco acked Unitcon whethor he had ever veltten
 netitomcun revording this matter, te which Vialtcon cephicl in
the nozative., Protein asked Lf Uivltcon had ever coon a manera
om thic mictes ond chitcon again replica in the nogutive,

NW 88296 Docid:32989678 Page 36


4 gi Ye AP ope yt aes RS rye. ToS SC me
28 DLEEN SER SY CO UCTERE I DO DPOee Coven aT TENG
rs

ae eee arate k Gate txt ile Yer eee repo pCR PPT T inte mre!
OSC 2A09O VET ACESLCT TO RESLLICSIOS AGPIVITISS (ced)

nat bee et WE aw

at ay r ey Pott gt An Ate x gan cee oe
uo hia! nu? OY SRST EET Seiaran somor CSA) BY

Ga fork 24, 1975, Viltcon tolephencd the Mux effielal
acacions to renort oddiedenal infor-
ein had pesmi fron Viltcon by telophens on
L294, L975, This avditdenal inferration vas ad folders:

Rystein ovked hey Naltson had mace the teip to Ulamt;
mau pakd or. Unbceon told him he had Loswed

a Govermmont Troncportation Seywect (GFR). Lootein arked

vhether there was ony prior uritton authorization for Ublicon

to moke the tein ona Uhbicon told hin thare vac rene, Epstein
ached chet irl of rceord would have bean made asveriny the

tein and Unlacon explained thar the only eacerd ke Imey of vould
be the exoence voucher ha cubmitted eoverIne the ompemcac invebvad
and pocaibiy tha copy of the C&R cnieh he haa dceued. Uhltcon
cuplnincd to Coctein that the vouchor vowld meraly choy that

the GIS bed keen issucl for a rowvl-treip to and from Mand

and hov much per dicm hal been claimeu in connection with the
tzin, Opctein inqgubrod ac te vhether Unitcon had racbeteren

fe tha Atenort Hotel in Miemi, ond, If co, whother £2 vac uncer "
hic om more, Ubberon told Soctein that he hau roylotere? under
his mame af this ketal,

rt

3

Cc

Bi

be

*

Lara

3

Fg
Ed
Cc

af

cS
fre
eal

“hen fubliven told Uhitcon he vomtcd him ta fly the
pothaca to Idem, he stated that only ka, Cullivan, Me. Hoover,
Ue. Tol.on, (thon PDE Asseciste Director) and Uy, Delmont
{chen [GE fcolctime to the Mractor) knew of thic situstion..
(2 the time, 1964, fvelliven vas an fsclotant Director.)
Sxtlivan nover did oxplain te Visitcon anything more xegexdin:,
thi. invident.

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 37

77 * reer *. Metis OE ge Ett RN SEE GF SRE BP, te TR es
| u o Sy Ce west if Heed hd ices 2 OL ony Ga nA Ly
* a ee ey mom a € ch he ial ad sted
TELIGLETL LOPTVEE TCS (oc)

rire So SUNT EOS SEPT Pee oie Rhee iar <P
0s ELSONVI OF AOYINC PRE SECOTAL comin (SA) BY

Uhitcon caid thet when he agrived at tho Vorth
Terminal at Gational Airport, following tulliven's telephonic
inctruetions, o youn: man whe vas unkroc te Unalticea but vuhe
adévercved hin ac ae, Unitcon," turned over to him a pachage
which vaso cropsed im brow paper end sealed with cealing tena.
Se is “hitcon': reeolleaction the package mencured approsimately
oieht Inchos by clcht Inckhas by oma Inch.

it is ‘hitcon'. further recollcetion that at the tine
the forcemoiny oceurved, Ming tac elvhor juve about to go abread
ba reeeive the Lebal Peaca Feise or probably had alresuy gon
abroad. fe was Uaitcon's recelicetion. that cometina chortly
after the mailing of the packeoa, Sullivan commented to Uhnitcen
that the pachere had net yet becn reecived by Lins. Baeanpea of
this remark, “nlicon is of the belie’ that tho packaye was
mailed to Ging at_the headquarters of the Seuthora Chelotian
leacerchip Confercnas oni not_to Hing'axcesidence, Further,
Lt vac Uhbiccen's ceeollection that it vas not lon after he
bac mailed the packase that Ning had a porcoral meeting with
iw. Hoover Im the latter's office.

Uhnbicen observed that in his opinion, tha informtidon
Which vias Im the poceecuion of Kpvutein prior to Intervierting
Uitcen must have originate] with Sullivan. Wirltcon noted thet
ie, Hoover ond Er. Tolcon are both deccaced and that he hac
heerd nothin toa indicate that Me. Lelmont hac een contneted
by merberc of the Staff of the TSC, Ona otha factor thot
eaes Ualtcon to Fool that sullivan wac the ceurea of the
information wan a quection Cpetcein wadced au te whether Whit. on
lind put a xeturn addwess on tha pachkace chen he acérecscd it te
Ging. ‘Ritson said he recalls that hon he vas dn idamd and
receiyod the telephonie Instructions fron fullivan, Sullivan
told bin that he chowld put a roturn odexces on the pachoce
aad Vhitcon then pointe: out to kubliven that If he did co,
emi the namo of the acdressen became cmeered, the packoro
vould Grd up ab comeonc’s return adécess eather than in the

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 38

*
ve
as) id
.

t
0. o, She SEER? COLIESTES £0 STUDY COVES IATA
OPILLIONS WET RASPLOT To MEKLGion ACTIVITIES (ore)
Qo, EGAVIET OF REPEL PRE SPRCLAL achi@ (84) BY
OSC SPAre tooo

tel

dead Lettor offices. Sullivan concurred that mo roturn aceress
thovld be ucéd. Thus, tullivan vowld probably have rancon

to have commented rocarding the use ox nomace of a return
addzenn,

On Aexdl 24, 1975, Uhlecon furnished by telophone
to the aforementioned Byuvonu offielal tha follaring additional
Infornation vhich he had not furnished to Ipstein, Whitson
stated dt vas now his recollection he had made the [damt
trip cither in the Inte Eummer or carly Pall of 1964 and that
Ring was Yauay"” at the tin.

PEL Records Coneernin: Valtcon'ts Travel

The foLlcvin:;. information is on record in the Par {
conecrnins the travel of Unitecon dizeussed above. Oa
Lecamber 9, L864, a Travel Voucher wan processed for payment
te Unttron the coum of $19.40 for travel curing the period
November 1-30, 1964. On cecord alse is a momorandun copy of
% Government Trancportntion Request issued Uovember 21, 1964,
to Patioond Aisiines in the cum of 5107.40 for air eoach travel,
Washington, Db, OG, to ldami, Florida, and return. Uovember 21,
1604, Les beer: determined to have boon a Saturday, Thero is
mot available in the PBi any copy of Ehe actual voucher cubnitted
by Vhitson.

NOTE: Original and one copy to the Attorney Gererral (AG

may forward the copy to James A. Wilderotter, Associate Counsel
to the President). Information herein taken from two memoranda
We.R. Wannall to J. B. Adams 4/23, 24/75, “Senstudy 75; Former
Supervisor Lich Whitson, Assigned Intelligence Division." Voucher
and GIR information from J. D. Cox, Voucher Unit, Computer
Systems Division, ¢

oP

BWV &8296 Docld:32989628 Page 39


1-Mr.d. A. Mintz
one i-Mr. W.R. Wannall
1-Mr. W. QO. Cregar

H The Attorney General April 18, 1975
( i . 1-Mr. R. H. Horner
} «Director, FBI 1-Mr. T° E. Burns
ad .
/' O
UNITED STATES ELECT COMMITTEE

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
a er nee ee
5)

dated Mareh 19, 1975, requesting certain documents and other information
_ From | the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and specifically Part IV,
“Policies an and Procedures.

Since the enclosed memorandum captioned "Microphone
Surveillance," dated Moy 20, 1954, originated with the Office of the Attorney
General and is covered under this request, we are deferring to your
judgment in this matter. The FBI interposes no objcction to furnishing
this document to the Committee, it being noted that the document appeared in
tote in the United States Government Printing Office publicaticn captioned
"Warrantless Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillances, 1974."

to the Senate Select Committee apprising the Committee of our referral of

Enclosures - 2

Comp. Syst. —_
Ext. ‘fey Wgeuments ee with the FBI. \
Files & Com,’
ie J - at
Gen. Inv. eA
Ident. a
inspection
Intell.

CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL ATTACHED a

Plan. & Eval, — : fe
Spec. Inv. i LY“ yitloogn iF

Ly ae a -
_« Training i * \. - oe
Legal Coun.
: Telephone Rm. _..
S Da . MAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT C_)

' Director Sec’y

WRE82%G DE|d:329R9628 Page 40

Laboratory

q « ray
*
8

this matter to you. A copy of this memorandum is enclosed for your records.

2 we ‘ i oa BEC

an

goat “ye eet

i 4
vip! Reference is made to a letter from the Senate Select Committee a

Also enclosed for your approval is the original of 2 memorandum

#

62-116395 Bee. oe we My pases If fe, “Mey
TEB:vb ° nh
A (i) ‘4 . Paid =
: y 1G MAY 2 1975
NOTE: Fs
Assoc. Dir, .
Bee AD Ine The request referred to above is one of several contained in the
Asst. Dirt referenced communication. We are referring this matter to the Department as a g
Admin,

matter of protocol in line with our policy of furnishing the Committee only , .-.

an
,
ro

GPO 954.545

. »
/ ~


April 18, 1975

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE: POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Reference is made to letter dated March 19, 1975, to the
Attorney General from the Chairman of the captioned Committee, which
enclosed cortain requests for documents and other information from the

Federul Burcau of Investipation (BI.

This is to cdvise that with respect to the memorandum from
the Attorney General ic the Birceter, FBI, captioned "iHerophone
Surveillance ," dated May 20, 1954, we ave deferring action on this request
to the United States Department of Justice inasmuch as this communication

oviginated with that Dopartment.
62 ~ 116385

1- The Attorney General

TEB: vb , y
yin :
(8)
Assoc, Dir.
| Dep. AD Adm.
1 Dep. AD Inv. __
Asst. Dir.:
Admin.
Comp. Syst. —.
Ext, Affairs
Files & Com.
Gen. Inv.
Ident. _______.
Inspection
Intell. . Ore hipe
7
Laboratory lek , ;

Plan. & Eval. — é /

Spec. Inv. A f
Training —__— v he

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm.

- Ditector Seety... MATL ROOM 1 TELETYPE UNIT [_]
WW 88296 Docld: 32969628 Page 41 —

aes ae hed
a Bs 2D yplt
2
Per ee: scp
« eee ave AX

re

te

yee bree
iF gil oC Q
Cy

. : GPO 954.546
MO Des §4

wt Mls
1 Co Ng
He ee wat wees

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 42

meee fea) SRI “acre ee

iq
Hl
E

“ENCLOSURE


* SHtannaRo FaRM NO. 64 . ,
wo

sp Sie

’ ? byte a
7 tf FUICE LA CMON ’AUHE « UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

TO ‘Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation DATE: May 26 MySt
6s
FROM The Attorney General a
SUBJECTNECROPHONS SURVEILLANCE oo 155-26
' | . ae acta Viiiry:

The recent decision of the Supreme Court entitled Irvine T.
California, 3h7 U.S. 128, denouncing the use of microphone: surveillances
by city police in a gembl ing casa makes appropriate a reappraisal of
the use which may be made in the future by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation of microphone surveillance in connection with matters
relating to the internal security of the country.

Tt is clear that in some instances the use of microphone

sarvehlbonss to the only nasethle way of umcovering the activities

of ces somts, nossibia sahotanrs, and subversive persons, In

* suc} X om of the opinion thet the national interest requires
co

surreillence be utilised by the Federal Bureau of
Invesvig nis % use need nob be limited to the development of
evidence for prosecution. The FBT has an intelligence function in
connection with internal security matters equally as important

the dwty of developing evidence for presentation to the courts and
-the national security requires that the FBI be able to use microphone
‘surveillance for the proper discharge of both of such functions.
The Department of Justice approves the use of microphone surveillance
_ by the FBY under these circumstances and for these purposes.

fact]
~—

EF do not consider that the decision of the Supreme Court ‘
in Irvine v. California, swora, requires a different course. That ; :
readily distinguishadie on its facts. The language of the

is
case is
Court, however, indicates certain uses of microphones which it would
be well to avoid, if possible, even in internal security investige-
tions. It is quite clear that in the Irvine case the Justices of the
Supreme Court were outraged by what they regarded as the indecency of
installing 4 microohone in a bedroom. They denomced the utilization
of such methods of investigation in a gambling case as shocking. The '
Court's action is a clear indication of the need for discretion and
intelligent restraint in the use of microphones by the FBI in all
cases, including internal security matters. Obviously, the instalia~
tion of a microphone in:a bedroom or in some comparably intimate
Location shovld be avoided wherever possible. It may appear, however,

\ inet important intelligence or evidence relating to matteng ipconmected
fae.

. . the national. seoucs ty cen only be obtained by the installation of

os a  ioreehone in such a location. It is my opinion, that under such

ea

cireuxstances the installation is proper ane is not prohibited by the~
Suprene, Court's decision in the irvine case, {

_NWv88296_Docld: 32989628 Page 43 | . _ _ (


~ 2 «

Previous interpretations which-have been furnished to you
as to what may constitute trespass in the instellation of microphones,
suggest that the views expressed have been tentative in nature and
have attempted to predict the course which courts would follow
rather than reflect the present state of the law. Jt is realized
that not infrequently the question of trespass arises in connection
with the installation of a microphone. The question of whether a
trespass is actually involved end the second question of the effect
of such a trespass upon the admissibility in court of the evidence thus
obtained, must necessarily be resolved according to the circumstances
of each case. The Department in resolving the problems which may arise
in connection with the use of microphone surveillance will review the
cirewnstances in each case in the light of the practical necessities
of investigation and of the national interest which must be protected.
It is my opinion that the Department should adopt that interpretation
which will permit microphone coverage by the FBI in a manner most
conducive to our national interest. I recognize that for the FBI
to fulfill its important intelligence function, considerations of
internal security and the national safety are paramomt and, there-

ent kha watianoal. ~

fore, may compel the mrestricted uss uf tis techiigue in the

interest, .
RE.

- NW 88296 Docid:32989625 Page 44

TO

Jeno

_ A SUBJECT :

oye

A MAY oF 975

. ®PTIONAL FORM NO. 10 ty $010~106 é
MAY 1962 EDITION
. GSA GEN. REG, NO. 27
UNITED STATES . wee ; Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. —

d. . Dep. AD Inv. ——
Memorandum wo
/ : Comp. Syst. ——
. MR. wafast pate: 4/8/75 pelo Files & com
TON commas Wow
TS oats F Inspection __.
: L. C. GROOVER mene ait js ue oe pert a
COAG DATE Pent Evo
Spec. Inv.
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON IN INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES Training
“tt cmnenenmienatntetongece venrtene einen oe eta egal Coun.

Telephone Rm. —
Director Sec’y —_

Jov)lpo Reference Legal Counsel to J. B. Adams memorandum
dated 3/20/75 captioned as above and letter of Senator Frank Church
datéd 3/19/75.

ore iel

ato

Relet requested, among other things, the titles and number’
of FBI field office agents assigned to internal security, intelligence
collection and/or counterintelligence matters, operations or activities,
together with the percent of total agent man-hours devoted to such matters,

ag ee

operations and activities ( page 3, item ITIC of relet).

The purpose of this memorandum is to forward to the Legal
Counsel Division, through the Intelligence Division, the response, attached
herewith, to the above request.

It is noted the request specifically mentions internal security,
intelligence collection and counterintelligence matters. Our response has
been constructed in the traditional two categories of internal security and
counterintelligence. Intelligence collection (informants) is included in the
data for both of the other categories as appropriate.

RECOMMENDATION: REC-100 3
———e 2 HE DG a

That this memorandum with enclosure ms forwarded to the
Intelligence Division for review, classification and approval and, thereafter,
forwarded to the Legal Counsel Division which is coordinating repligs.ioy
the Senate Select Committee. mma meres

Enclosure . ; ae MAY 2 1978

. worn weneintin <i f
1 - Mr. Wannall

. SEE INTELLIGENCE DIVISION
1 - Mr. Mintz
1- Mr, Jackson ADDENDUM PAGE TWO

ogc le SEE LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION
JTC IAB / ADDENDUM PAGE THREE

Na ( i”

W 88256 Docld:32989620 Page 45

° @
- ~ . . “
«

Memorandum to Mr, Walsh
Re: Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence Activities

ysob

ADDENDUM: Intelligence Division, WOC:aso, 4/4/75

The Intelligence Division has reviewed the attached figures
prepared by the Administrative Division. Under the criteria of the current
Classification Act it would be impossible to justify classification of these
figures; however, should they be made public or fall into the hands of a
hostile foreign intelligence service, it would reveal the current capability
the FBI employs in the field of counterintelligence against the total foreign
threat, In view of the above, the Intelligence Division strongly recommends
that the Legal Counsel Division discuss this with the staff of the Senate
Select Committee pointing out the vulnerability implicit in this attachment
in an effort to have the Committee withdraw its request identified as TIC,

ye fel
YP Uf yp

/ NW 68296 Docld:32989628 Page 46


x ‘
‘ .
wo .
iy
“4 4 D

ADDENDUM: LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION pvp:akl“4-14-75

Regarding the observations of the Intelligence Division
concerning the making available the amount of manpower dedicated to
counterintelligence and domestic intelligence work in the FBI, the
Legal Counsel Division has the following observations:

(1) Based on our analysis and conversations this
oe ff pivision has had with Fred B. Griffith of the Inspection Division, it
ober. jppears that the information contained in this memorandum may be
tart i classified confidential under Executive order 11652.

4 (2) Before making any determination as to whether we
make such information available to the Senate Select Committee, it
would appear we should determine from CIA what their response to
such a request will be so that our position and that of CIA will be
consistent in this area. In this regard SA Paul V. Daly has contacted
Leon F. Schwartz, Liaison Section of Intelligence Division, and requested
he determine from CIA what their position in this regard is.

(3) It is not beliéved that we should take a hard and fast
position that this information not be made available to the Committee or
that we make an effort to have the Committee withdraw their request for
this information. We should rather develop some fallback position such
as that this information will be made available to the Chairman of the
Committee or will be made available during an oral briefing, etc.

4 aches
yp ve ,
a | one fog Website Oi fed 1008
yi Dy (ULE phitrad”
a ui if WaEe 7 ekw ad .

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 47


CONFWENTIAL fsa

THE NUMBER OF FBI FIELD OFFICE AGENTS ASSIGNED TO ™
INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS

Based on a survey of all FBI field offices, it has been determined that matters relating to

? ~
internal security and counterintelligence require the following commitment of manpower in FBI field mR
ro offices, stated in terms of equivalent full-year employees: xe
_ SS
Total ™
Assistant Equivalent Full-
Special Agents Special Agents Special Agent Year Agent
In Charge In Charge Supervisors Special Agents Employees
Internal Security 2.80 1.75 47.06 671.07 722.68 e~
| Fe)
Counterintelligence 2.34 2.16 46.18 — 904.29 954, 97 3

s

These equivalent full-year employees represent the following percentages of total field office agent

personnel assigned as of 2/28/75:

Assistant Percent of
Special Agents Special Agents Special Agent Total Agent
In Charge In Charge Supervisors Special Agents Personnel
Internal Security 4,2% 2.9% 11.9% 9,5% 9.5%
. Counterintelligence 3.5% 3.6% 11.7% 12. 8% 12.6%
| , a Classified{by 9 2 & 3

|

et
| NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 48

Exempt ffou GDS, ;, Category
Date of Declissification Indefinite

oa

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10. ty $010-105 Ni

MAY 1962 EDITION :

GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27 ® | »

UNITED STATES GO¥ERNMENT , Meee: Ot in
Dep. AD inv, __

\: Memorandum re

Admin.
| Comp. Syst. ___
: Ext. Affairs

. fro : Mr. Je B. Adams DATE: 4-14-75 Files & Com,
z

Gen. Inv.
. Ident.
PF Pe Baie Inspection
FROM : Legal Counsel fy bit Intel,
Ce . if . Lab; ratory 4

ee f Susge Coun.
sugjecT: ‘SENSTUDY 75 (i

Plan. & Evol,
* Coreen ame prnteanneneesy cptpannte

Spec. Inv.
Training

On 4-11-75 Doug Marvin, Assistant to the Attorney bia eF
General, was apprised of the fact we intended to affix a property stamp “77°. *
on certain nonclassified documents we were furnishing the Senate Select 4” Fp Bie
Committee (SSC). It was explained the stamp contained a caveat that beg
the particular document may not be made available to unauthorized :
individuals without the Bureau's consent. He advised he felt this procedure

was excellent. m {
Ay
On 4-14-75 Mr. Marvin requested that all future contacts, .” |
with the Department concerning SENSTUDY be coordinated with Jack Fuller,

extension 3892. Mr. Fuller is assigned to the Attorney General's office.

“a
RECOMMENDATION: me
For information. en onlt 7
Ai
opraTios core
ait DE ones th "p

iQ

\

7 ere, pase
“ih Wy

qu
hs ne REO. 106

| | oy
“ i bi. Vb3F —_
‘ vee oan a UO eS, *

\ v
x 1 - Mr. Wannall A p.
~  1-Mr. Mintz oy S APR 231975 . .-)
1-Mr. W. O. Cregar Mot PP a

. ” eaeataget, doco EL
1 - Mr. Hotis os

1-Mr. Daly . . . XN |
PVD: (kg (1) he
vba

NW 88296 Docld:32989678 Page 49

< OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 5010-106
MAY, 1962 EDITION
Oty GEN, REGONO. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Assos. Dir
M L -Mewde-BrvAdems br es
emorandum Ll vergeaeeeeee
| N 1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall - Conn sya
n :MR. W. R. WANN. % "pare: April 14, 1975 nie
adh 1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis Gen. tov.
L- Mr. L. F. Schwartz nenection
now I WP. CREGAR 1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar ia
Plen & Evel =
suBjECT| SENSTUDY 75 Sree: love
{ w wit Legal Coun,
Mr. L. C. Groover to Mr.’ Walsh memorandum dated ——Felerhene Rm. —
Py 75 entitled "Senate Select Committee on Intelligence =
Ctivities" forwarded to the Intelligence Division for review

the titles and numbers of FBI field office Agents assigned to

internal security, intelligence collection, and/or counter-

intelligence matters, operations or activities. This was in response
to requirement IIIC of Senator Church's’ letter dated 3/19/75.

By addendum dated 4/4/75 the Intelligence Division
recommended that the Legal Counsel Division discusse-) with the
staff of the Senate Select Committee (SSC) our reluctance to
provide these type figures to the SSC. T-

On 4/11/75 I discussed with Mr. John Clark, Associate
Deputy to the Director of Central Intelligence for the intelligence
community, the request of Senator Church. Specifically, Mr. Clark
was asked #£ Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had received such a
request and how they responded, Mr. Clark advised that CIA had
not received a specific request for the titles and numbers of é
CIA officestiss assigned to intelligence collection or counter-
intelligence matters. However, CIA had received a request to
identify the names and numbers of CIA covert officers assigned

overseas. ‘
wen. foe2,— 11 6 BGs
Mr, Clark advised that CIA-intéended to advise the aa
Director of the SSC that CIA was unwilling to provide such names
and numbers to the SSC for retention in its files. However, CIA
would be willing to allow a senior staff member or the Staff sms
Director to review the names and numbers of CIA coverf™OPftcers
overseas at the CIA headquarters building. we nPR 29 1078 af

woc: eke KM a! g meni

(7) mule iat CONTINUED - OVER“ TTI
cnn ¢
. On otk G
gi casey. gpntl SEE LEGAL COUNSEL ADDENDUM
[gol PAGE 3

Rebs old se 8a0628 Page 50


Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall
RE: SENSTUDY 75

ACTION :

If approved, the Legal Counsel Division should advise
the SCC that because of security considerations, the im $s and
numbers of Special Agents of the FBI assigned to internal
security and counterintelligence matters cannot be furnished
to the SCC in decumented form for the Committee files. However,
the FBI would be willing to show the titles and figures to
Mr. Miller or a senior staff member at FBIHQ in an effort to
demonstrate a spirit of cooperation and credibility..

wie brat puseod Fc


i

] <8 a

|

1 , =

ADDENDUM: LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION PVD:dkg 4-15-75

Legal Counsel Division interposes no objection to
Intelligence Division's recommendation. If approved, Intelligence
Division prepare necessary communication to notify the SSC.

ya vi

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 52


OPTIONAL FORM-NO, 10 5010-106
MA@1962 EDITION

GSA*GENS REG. ‘RO. 27

UNITED STATES . ee
Memorandum

Mir. We Re vomit
Z
FROM : W, ol ffegar
1

SUBJECT: * SENSTUD mF '
“GRIBEING FOR/STAFF MEMBERS

BY . INTELLIGENCE DIVISION
APRIL 11, 1975

members of his staff in the Conference Room at INTD,
from the Committee were Mr, William Miller,

1- Mr. J. B.
1-~ Mr, J, A,
DATE: 4/11/75

l- Mr, W, R.
l- Mr. W. 0.

pats

Adams
Mintz

«

Wannall
Cregar

Assoc, Dir.

Comp. Syst. ——
Ext. Affairs ——
Files & Com. —

Gen.
Ident.

Inv.

or aa
Levon SRE fe w
Legal Co

bers
# on hs
pT Se oath
pres cE) gol
Ne

lay Cy] DR
On 4/11/75, from 10:00 am until 12:20 pm, staff

members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
Activities were briefed by Assistant Director Wannall and

Mr, Frederick A, 0. Schwarz III, Chief Counsel; and
Messrs. Mark Gitenstein, Marvin Epstein, Patrick Shea, Britt
Snider and Loch Johnson, all staff members,

B
Staff Director;

Plan,

Spec.
Training

& Eval.

inv, —_

Telephone Rm. —
Director Sec’y __

The first hour of the briefing was occupied with
the showing of the INTD slide presentation and commentary
which provided highlights of the work of the INTD, both in

the counterintelligence and internal security field,
this presentation a question and answer period ensued for the

rest of the briefing, Mr, Miller and Mr, Schwarz posed most

of the questions,

In the counterintelligence field the thrust of the
questioning was directed toward the continuing growth of the
hostile intelligence presence in the United States and its
short-term and long-term effect on the FBI's operations,
Mr. Wannall pointed out that the Director on previous occasions
had indicated his intention to "beef up" the counterintelligence
effort of the FBI by the addition of some 250 Special Agents,
and that INTD had also effected certain programs deSigned to
asSign certain counterintelligence functions to non-Agent
personnel, thereby freeing additional Special Agents to function
as case officers, In response to a queStion’ as to whether the
additional investigative effort necessary to counter the

mounting hostile intelligence threat might not involve investi

gation of more and more American citizens, Mr, Wannall es

62—-116395

EWL: jv
(5) *

Nev GbahP eki-4988b628 Page 53

REC: 106

bed Men

=

il

Following

ae

en:

oe

CONTINUED ~ OVER="™" al

ian
>

3

<\*

i


NW 88296 Docld:3. #45 Page 54

Memorandum to Mr. W, R. Wannall
Re: Senstudy 75
Briefing for Staff Members
by Intelligence Division
April 11, 1975

hat this was inevitable, He stressed, however, the investi-
ative policies of the FBI which protected the constitutional
ights and right of privacy of such individuals,

On the domestic internal security side the thrust
of the questioning appeared to indicate an interest in the
predication, duration and administrative controls of investi-~
gations of domestic organizations and individuals, Again,
Mr, Wannall stressed the precautions inherent in FBI policy
and instructions to the field in these matters, pointing out,
in effect, that these investigations are founded on statutory
authority and are closely supervised by experienced personnel
at Headquarters level, The Committee staff appeared to accept
these answers and no critical or hostile attitudes on their
part were evident,

The briefing was terminated at 12:20 pm, due to
commitments on the part of the staff, Mr, Miller and
Mr, Schwarz both expressed their appreciation for the briefing
and indicated it had been most instructive, They indicated
a desire to continue these discussions at some later date and
Mr, Wannall assured them that he would be happy to continue
the briefing at any future mutually agreeable time,

Perhaps most significant of all questions posed was
the final question by Mr, Schwarz in which he inquired as to
what advantages and disadvantages to the FBI could be anticipated
as a result of the Committee fulfilling its mandate, Mr, Wannall
replied that any statutory authority defining and affirming the
FBI's role in the intelligence collection field would certainly
be a poSitive achievement, He also stated that any result of
the Committee's investigation which would tend to limit the
investigative resources or the investigative effectiveness of
the FBI would surely be an unfortunate negative factor,

RECOMMENDATION :
None, For information, af
ew Moth if

un

i.

yi?


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 4 5010-106 r
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN. REG. NO, 27, “i
- ~UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT , Assoc. Dir,,.

Dep. AD‘

Memorandum i

Adel
Comp. Syst. —__

TO : Mr. J. B. Adams paTe: April 23, 1975 Ext Affairs —

Files & Com,

( m Sen ies
FROM : W. R, wannalds, i «rt aa

a

- Laboratory“a_@
Ca a Plan. & Eval,

SUBJECT: { SENSTUDY 75. Spee. Inv
FORMER SUPERVISOR LISH WHITSON Legal Coun. —_
ASSIGNED INTELLIGENCE DIVISION b ¢) Telephone Rm.

Director Sec’y __

At 3:17 p.m., 4/22/75 former Special Agent Ligh Whitson
who for many years was a supervisor in the Intelligance Division
telephoned me to advise that he had received a request to appear
for an interview by Michael Epstein, staff member of the Senate
Select Committee. The interview was scheduled for 4/23/75,

In response to a question by Mr. Whitson, he was advised
that to the writer's knowledge this was the first former Bureau
employee who had been requested to appear for an interview by any
member of the staff of the Select Committee, Whitson stated that
he was proceeding on the basis that he would respond to questions
propounded to him but he had some reservation in his mind concerning
answering questions which would involve material which he knew to be
Classified at the time he retired. He commented he had noted in the
news media that staff members of the Committee were reportedly to be }
granted clearances through TOP SECRET - Q (Atomic Energy Matters). <.-

ra

Whitson was advised by the writer that while it was true
staff members were being granted clearances, the Bureau was endeavoring
to establish procedures through the Attorney General whereby highly
sensitive and classified material could be revealed on a restricted
basis in response to Committee inquiries; for example, in some
instances we would request that only the Majority and Minority leaders
on the Committee be furnished certain types of material and in other
instances only the Senators themselves as opposed to a Bae oe yes:

£019

Mr. Whitson said in view of Pre it Cat his O.8ioa
as responsive and candid during the interview by Mr. Epstein as he
could be but if any questions arose in his mind with respect to
revelation as to what he, Whitson, considered to be sensitive material,
he anticipated he would express his concern to Mr. Epstein and advise
him he felt it would be appropriate to check with the Biieidl mise =
is aware of regulations by the Attorney General which preclude #
revealing FBI information without the Attorney General'g SRAC aS

WRW: Imi fe
(5)
1 =- Mr. Adams
1 ~ Mr. Mintz
i - Mr. Cregar
1 - Mr. Wannail

| GAARA 9 8S
NW

2796 Dochd:32989678 Page 55


of °

Memorandum to Mr. Adams

Re: SENSTUDY 75
FORMER SUPERVISOR LISH WHITSON
ASSIGNED INTELLIGENCE DIVISION

prior approval. Whitson stated that if the writer had no
objection, he would telephone again after his interview with
Epstein in the event any matters came up which he felt would be
of interest to the Bureau, He was assured that the writer had
no objection whatsoever and would appreciate any observations
which he cared to pass along.

ACTION:

For information and record purposes,

ft Var yp _/

NW 85296 Docid:32989628 Page 56


iy | aa
|
1-Mr. J. A. Mintz i

1- Mr. W. R. Wannall
1- Mr. W. O. Cregar

; The Attorney General April 22, 1975

\ | 6
: ‘s ; Director ’ FBI sere
i . ° QO sett ELON gonek ae
- a ant foe ne ESTEE *
M | UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ren fa ho eros nal
"ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ws a

| bt

wel
By letter dated March 19, 1975, the Senate Select Committee
requested information from the FBI. Part I of the Committee's letter pertrined
to the’ egal authority for investigations .

}

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the Committee is the

oiginal of a memorandum and four documents on the subject of legal authority
for investigations.
sos Ml
a A copy of this memorandum, with enclosures, is being _ ||
for your records. . i
aeHye.- ee by hs Gast va. J ||
Enclosures ~ 10 Wiig Bel.» oe aa Hee st Mie i {|
AEW: vb . (6) of Caremitce (SSE)

ae 4 wD
NOTE:

a

The Senate Select Committee's 3/19/75, letter was transmitted with
an. attachment, prepared by the Committee's staff, which set forth examples of
the type of information concerning domestic intelligence jurisdiction of interest
to fit. Among those items cited in the attachment to the Committee's 3/19/75, |

letter was a study on jurisdiction prepared for former Acting FBI Director

‘ Lonis Patrick Gray II by the Office of Legal Counsel, dated 5/18/72. Representatives

of the Legal Counsel Division do not believe the 5/18/72 study is, in itself,

‘appropriate’ to furnish i in response to the question of the Senate Select Committee

Assoc. Dir, __ OM legal authority. However, Legal Counsel Division believes that two interme ——H
Dep. AD Adm. FR t me oranda , repared in connection with the drafting of the 5/18/72 study , K |
Dep. AD Inv. £4 et t to the Senate Select Committee's inquiry. Accordingly, {H8s29 1995 j |

wR bg elfiei 2 ite

s.

Asst. Din woul d be petit
Admin. two documents, items one and two of attached memorandum for the Commitige,

Comp. Syst... —_rty " slat
Ext. Affoice . OF being furnished. |

Files & Com, 4

a io Paik : ;
een = (pel, Bin QU aa \e" base ve fos

Hn

Sez YER Aa J Wo pk
Plan. val, \ '
on gor] if na

eae qt G0 sees

|, Director ELETYPE UNIT CJ
i gay Wei UE28 Paae Page 57


1-Mr.Jd.A. Mintz.
1- Mr. W. R. Wannall
1-Mr. W. 0. Cregar

Aprit 22, 1978
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMBDTTER
TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS
| WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE: LEGAL AUTHORITIES

’ Reference is made to the March 19, 1975, letter feom the
| Chairman of the Senate Select Commities to the Attorney General, requesting
éertain documents and other information from the FET.
{
Attached are the following documents responsive to Part I of
the Senate Select Committee's request, entitled "Legal Authorities":

1. An internal FBI memorandum dated Mey 16, 1972, enptioned
"FBI Jurisdiction; Criminal Intelligence Information.

2. An internal FBI memorandum, dated Moy 18, 1972, captioned
~.. “BRE Authority in Domestic Intelligence Matters,"

4

3. A study on subversion prepared for former Acting FBI
Director Louis Patrick Gray TH, dated May 19, 1972.

4 A memorandwn from the Direetor of the FRI to the Attorney

Genoral dated August 7, 1973, reeommonding the issuance of an Executive
Order concerning the conduct of domestic intclligence investirations.

Enclosures ~ 4 J

1- The Attorney General f

OR - ek jo. £3

fs
ENGLOSUSS
ye Ree MAIL ROOMEL_] «= TELETYPE unIT[_] ane

..Pocld:32989628 Page 58 A

GPO 934-545


“4 ! .

OFWICE OF THE DINECTOR
ss

a STATES DEPARTMENT oo srrce

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20535

April 22, 1975

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
. TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE: LEGAL AUTHORITIES

Reference is made to the March 19 , 1975, letter from the
Chairman of the Senate Select Committee to the Attorney General, requesting
. certain documents and other information from the FBI.

Attached are the following documents responsive to Part I of
the Senate Select Committee’s request, entitled "Legal Authorities":

1. An internal FBI memorandum dated May 16, 1972, captioned
"FBI Jurisdiction; Criminal Intelligence Information."

*

2. An internal FBI memorandum, dated May 18, 1972, captioned
“FBI Authority in Domestic Intelligence Matters."

3. A study on subversion prepared for former Acting FBI
Director Louis Patrick Gray III, dated May 19, 1972.

4. A memorandum from the Director of the FBI to the Attorney
General dated August 7, 1973, recommending the issuance of an Executive
Order concerning the conduct of domestic intelligence investigations.

Enclosures - 4 &
. . ; plo Te,
4 . p
. x se
gs

NIGH,
oe

%

SS

é a
1 US 2 -
Oe alt we pe ; ©)
Kh. GEKT-* DIO

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 59 ENCLOSURE


OfioMal Poms MO 16
RAS PED LONE «
POAC, 010, HD OP

. UNITED STATES covenent an @ mo “oe, fs

Memorandum co

awe eee!

: Mr. Dalbey . "DATE: 8/16/72
koM ; J, A, Mintz ON te ; ms ) genet
: , . . yo sarone ane — Stl
BJECT: FBI JURISDICTION: CRIMINAL - ean ST
. INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION ens
. »

’ 7 . You requested analysis of the legal authority for FBI
_ criminal intelligence collection and its relationship to our statutory

oe jurisdiction in criminal matters, . .

"The cathering of criminal ‘intelligence information"
describes activity not subject to precise definition. However, its
general objective is well understood by those engaged in law enforcement.
There exist individuals and groups whose daily occupations are directed
toward profit without regard to the restraints of the law. Yet, uy the
verv nature af their associations. little actual participation in criminal
acts may be observed by the most astute law enforcement observer.

Their existence and contribution to the sum of criminal behavior. has been
detected and to some degree measured by the collection of data concerning
their personal life-siyles, property holdings, associates, influence, ana
‘access to capital. Such information has been characterized as "criminal
intelligence." . cM

: For years, the FBI has been aware of the need to identify
these resources of the criminal.element. Congress responded to this
need through the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970. The Congressions
findings were that organized crime in the United States is a highly
sophisticated, diversified, and widespread activity that annually drains
billions of dollars from America's economy by unlawful conduct and by
the illegal use of force, fraud and corruption. Legitimate business and
labor unions.are infiltrated and corrupted and om’ democratic processes
are subverted. The problem iwas declared to be.of of national concern
both as to our economy and the domestic security,

'

CONTINUED ~ OVER

lr MOS re? ‘ks :

ENCLOSURE -~/


4 . a Loe
"+ > Memorandum’ J, A. Mintz to Mr. Dalbey

RE: FBI JURISDICTION: CRIMINAL
INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION

+

; ;
The Act attempted to attack organized crime by making
criminal the management of syndicated gambling and by prohibiting
racketecring activity characteristic of organized crime including the

use of illegal proceeds for investment in legitimate business enterprises,

ae . The long-established suspicions of law enforcement officers
fe . - a) . ° ’
Poo bon were confirmed by the Congressional findings but statutory enactments
oS" 0 '+ did not eliminate the conduct described as evil therein, There remains
coe, .the task of establishing the identities of those constituting the national
"7" | menace and developing prosecutable evidence of their guilt. ‘Criminal
: -. intelligence" collection is one mcans by which this responsibility may
‘a. or". 1° be fulfilled, It may be the only practical means in view of the scarcity
Ff.” of witnesses willing to testify and ofthe high mortality potential of those
who do appear. A classic example of such intimidation is reported in
United States v, Addonizio, 451 F2d 49 (3rd Cir. 1972) where a pruspective

Weibsnna fam anette anan found an nnonymone nata nan tha cast af hie

Tt Pp mmm mee wee ee He epee eee ee

* Gar which read "This could have beena bomb. Keep your mouth shut."

. . Accepting the need for intelligence cathering as a practical

necessity, the issue remains as to its propriety in the face of Constituticnal
- "os .:+ protections. If the Supreme Court announces that individuals have a
fps Constitutionally protected right of privacy that may be overcome only
through established arrest, search, and subpoena procedures, the issue
' a ’ willbe seitled. But, thus far, the Court has only drawn upon the concept
of Constitutional privacy to resolve cases involving special circumstances
such as marital affairs (Griswold v, Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) ) and

nay +

interception of communications (Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) 3
yy . . .

| Oo ‘ More specific Constitutional limitations onthe criminal
intelligence function may be found in the First Armendment protections of
Speech and assembly; the Fourth Amendment prohibitions of unreasonable
Searches and seizures; and the Fifth Amendment privilege against
compulsory self-incrimination.

oe The theme consistently found in decisions having a bearing on th
. relationship between these rights and the collection of criminal intelligm ce
is that, when in direct conflict, the collection efforts must yield, Such is

. : a so ~R-

a 44 . .
. - '

NW-86296_Docld:32989628_PageGt


aa |

Memorandum J. A. Mintz to Mr. Dalbey
RE: FBI JURISDICTION: CRIMINAL
INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION

.

not to label criminal intelligence as necessarily the product of malpractice,
but to recognize the paramount nature of the Constitutional interests being
safecuarded, Other incidents of government regulatory authority have
been required to yield as well when confronted with legitimate claims of
Constitutiona] protection, e.g. the administrative search cases, Camara v.
Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523 (1967). a
: Overt and obtrusive conduct susceptible of being characterized
as harassment may well be enjoined as, for example, was the case of an

: obvious 24~hour-a-day physical surveillance ‘of an individual, his home,

_ relatives, friends, and associates (Giancana v. Johnson, 335 F2d 386
‘(7th Cir, 1964) cert. den. 379 U.S, 1001.” Similar results might be
expected where an identified officer loiters in the subject's place of
business (Bee See Books, Inc. v. Leary, 291 F, Supp. 622 (SD N.Y. 1988)

or openly attends organizational meetings where his presence inhibits
enmrmuninston and tha trancoantinn af tha bhuainedca af tha accamnmly (T.nral
309, United Furniture Workers v. Gates. 75 F. Supp. 620 (ND Ind. T928) ).
Owever, open photographic surveillance of public gatherings (Donahoe v.
Duling, 330 F. Supp. 308 (ED Va. 1971) ) and secret monitoring of
eriminal activities through the use of undercover agents (Lewis - wis v, United
States, 385 U.S. 206 (1968) ) and informants (Hoffa Vv. United Ste States, 383
Ws, 295 (1966) ) have met with judicial approval.
-y Obviously, criminal intelligence information gained by un-
reasonable search and seizure or through compelled self-incrimination is
tainted and subject to judicial condemnation upon complaint of one having
the requisite standing,

‘ Perhaps, the decision coming nearest to discussing the

legality of criminal intelligence collection was Anderson v. Sills, 106 N. 35.
Super. 945, 256 A2d 298 (1969), (reversed on the ground more complete
record was needed to support the decision) 56 N.J, 210, 265 A2d 678 (1970)
New Jersey had responded to the threat of continuing civil disorders by
collecting intelligence Information on persons and events alleszed to have
some relationship to such activities. The trial court held the collection
effort to be unconstitutional because it conflicted with the First Amendment.

‘

'. .Memorandum J. A, Mintz to Mr. Dalbey
RE: FBI JURISDICTION: CRIMINAL
: INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION

a 4 . .
However, the court order to des troy the intelligence files excepted instances
“where such information will be used to charge persons with specifically
fo defined criminal conduct."" 256 A2d at 305, ‘Thus, the decision may be
~ _ | interpreted as drawing a distinction between collection of intelligence
: _ information where political or social factors are involved and First
“. °. Amendment freedoms therefore may be directly inhibited and collection
i\;/ + + of eriminal intelligence information where the objective is the establishment
ToS of criminal conduct and the identities of the offenders, While the Fourth
and Fifth Amendment may be enjoyed by the guilty and innacent alike, it
is improbable that the First Amendment would be stretched so far as to
protect freedom of speech and assembly when such speech and assembly
‘constitute eléments of a criminal offense. On appeal, the Supreme Court
of New Jersey returned the case for further development of the record
and observed’, , . the executive branch may gather whatever information
it reasonably believes to be necessary to enabie it to perform the police
‘roles, detectional and preventive, A court should not interfere in the

et Go masts . oe .
GsUtiTe ur pe bun WL CE ELLE YL GL ite aL ineSo, Buu wou au DOU.

‘A tentative conclusion may be stated, subject to further develop-
ment of the case law, The gatherings. of crimina 1 intelligence information
for the purpose of developing evidence ‘of specific offenses characteristic

of organized crime is legally justified as well as practically necessary.

_ Where there is diversion from the proper objective and such collection

’ efforts are manipulated to cause harassment or where such activity conflicis
’ with Constitutional rights, to that extent the criminal intelligence program

" must be reformed, oes

~4 a .
* .


GEUONAL 108M HO, 10 soie~toe

- 7 UNITED STATES GO\ é.. oo @
Memorandum |
> _ Mr. Dalbey | . | pare: 5/18/72
‘4 . “a : ;
unser: PET AUTHORITY IN' DOMESTIC oo, aimee zie eae
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS ie ee col

«
*

_ You requested an analysis of the Bureau's authority to conduct

“+ domestic intelligence investigations, The question .of the jurisdictional

' « basis for these investigations is being examined at length by the Domestic
’ Intelligence Division and will not be discussed here, .

tt is fair to say. that the domestic intelligence program is one
of the more controversial areas of the Bureau's activities. For one thing,
an intelligence investigation casts a broader net than inquiries that are
dizcetcd toward the nraaf of a snecifie offense. A large amount of raw data
is collected, much of which has no immediate bearing on potential offenses
or offenders, But seemingly trivial information may later become important
in the detection and prevention of violence or civil disorder. ‘There are —
also fears that these investigations may eventually touch upon one's
political beliefs, habits or associations; or that information collected for
proper purposes may eventually be misused at the hands of Government,

' Each is a legitimate concern, The notion of Government prying into the
personal lives: of its citizens is repellent to all ofus. And yet there isa
strong sense that the Government must acquire necessary intelligence
informat ion if it is to meet its responsibilities in connection with the

a national security.

One of the major concerns about our domestic intelligence
activities is that they are not supervised or monitored by any outside
agency, The claim is made that the Executive Branch has beeh left wide
discretion to define its own authority, and to choose the directions, methods,

- and focus of its investigations: For one thing, the law has never made
clear what facts and circumstances must be present to authorize an
intelliicence investigation, nor how far such an investigation may lawiully
proceed without being directed toward proof of a specific offense,

‘CONTINUED - OVER

ENCLOSURE Vv Jf

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 64

.

‘Momorandum J.@ Hotis to Mr. Dalbey e
.RE: FBI AUTHORITY IN DOMESTIC c. .
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS : 7 .

And unlike the practice in criminal cases, our clectronic surveillances in
security matters are not submitted for prior court approval. For another,
Yhe exclusionary rule which provides the usual method of judicial control
over investigative procedures, is not often available in security cases.
Since the goal.is largely preventive, these cases seldom come before the
courts, As arcsult, the public, the courts, and the Congress have very
little information about how we operate in domestic intelligence matters.
and what we do with ¢ the information acquired. ~,
In response to this situation, some members of the Congress have
pressured for tighter controls over the Bureau, perhaps in the form ofa
watchdog committee to oversee our operations. Senator Ervin, who chairs
the Senate Subsommittee on Constitutional Rights has expressed particular
concern about the right of privacy and the authority of the Government to
gather information, In.an exchange of correspondence with the Department
of Justice, the Senator has requested specific documentation of the
Departm ent's guidelines for the gathering and retention of domestic
intelligence information. He has also suggested that legisiation might ve
enacted, requiring a showing of probable cause before an investigation can
be initiated by the Government, It is doubtful that any such measure would
pass the Congress, -but the proposal dees show the mood of the times,

_ A paralicl trend may be developing in the courts. In several
recent cases, plaintiffs have made the-claim that Government information
gathering, which goes beyond the effort to apprehend criminal suspects,
may have a "chilling cffect’ on the exercise of First Amendment rights,
These challenges thus far have not been successful, Anderson v. Sills,
56 N.J. 210, 265 A2d 678 (1970); Donahoe v. Dulinge, 3380 FL Supp. 308
(E,D. Va. 1971); American Civil Libertics Union v. Westmoreland, 323
F. Supp. 1153 (N.D. I. 1971),

‘ The courts have generally recognized that one of the principal
functions of the Bureau is to gather information law violators, agitators of
violence and possible aibversives.. Tatum v. Laird, 444 red 947, 957
(D.C. Cir, 1971) cert. granted, 404 UTS 955 (i971); The Fifth Avenue
Peace Parade Committee, etal. v. J. Edear Hoover, et. al., (0 Gv. 2666
HRT, decided February 16, 1972. The Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit, has observed that the identity of the agency gathering
such information is determinative of,the significance of any alleged chill to


‘Memorandum J. B. Hotis to Mr. Dalbey

RE; FBI AUTHORITY IN DOMESTIC ; ;
| INTELLIGENCE MATTERS , .

» Ft
o

to ¥irst Amendment’rights. Thus, in Davis v. Ichord, 442 F2d 1207 (D.C.

'. Cir, 19°70) although appellants allecedly felt chilled by a Congressional

Committce'’s investigation of them, the Court of Appeals found there was
insufficient justiciability in their claims to create a viable case or

‘controversy. This was because appellants had "failed to bring the fear of

investigation by the present Committee home to themselves, their fears
were wholly speculative; there were no criminal proceedings contronting
them; nor was any action pending. Moreover, the Court in Davis found
that the power of a Congressional Committee began and ended with the
investigation; whenever a Committee of the Consress seeks punitive action,
the Judiciary must become involved, and thus every investigation has a
judicial check which operates to guarantee the protection of constitutional
rights. Lott ;

This latter aspect of the Davis decision was piven per Specuy oby
the Court of Appeals in,Tatum. In contrasting the potential impact on First
Amendment rights ocensionced by investigations conducted by the military
with investigations ‘conducted by a civilian investigative agency, such as the

-. Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Court observed:

- The compilation of data by a civilian investigative
agency is thus not the threat to civil liberties or the
_ deterrent on the exercise of the constitutional right
_ of free speech that such action by the military is, because
@ civil investigative agency has no inherent power always
being subject to the well-defined restrictions of law and
the approval of the courts. * * *

There,the Court pontedly examined the "source of the chill"! as it had in
Davis, and in applying the "chilling effect doctrine’, singled out the FBI
as a source which does not generate a reasonable basis for inhibitions or
apprehensions, Jn this connection the Court stated,

~ " -

po :
Memorandum J. B. Hotis to Mr. .Dalbey oo

RE: FBI AUTHORITY IN DOMESTIC
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS

Referring to our holding in Davis that the
"source of the chill" is important in determining whether
there is any inhibiting effect on the exercise of First
Amendment rights, we think that there is a significant
difference between investigative actions taken by a
military agency in reference to civilians and similar
investigative actions taken by a regular investigative
agency of a civilian branch of the Government.

4 . .

toe One of the functions of a civilian investigative

. os, agency, suchas the Federal Bureau of Investigation, is

‘ : - to compile information onlaw violators, agitators of
violence, and possible subversives. It has always been
recognized that this is a delicate function, and it is
exercised under the direction of the Attorney General,
Investigation is performed by men a majority ‘ci whoin are
undér the direction of lawyers in the Justite Department, -
and the information compiled is only usable and effective
through court action. The FBIis powerless to imprison
or to alfect his liberty in any way except through the
action of the courts, ;

»

As‘to the surveillance of public meetings through the use of
informants, it has been held that such surveillance is not per se actionable,
See Donahoe v. Duling, 330 F, Supp. 308 (E.D. Va. 1971) (police
surveillance of street demonstrations held not to offend First Amendment
rights).

The Supreme Court in Hoffa v. U.S., 385 U.S. 293 (1966), held
that the use of secret informants is “not per se unconstitutional", and does
not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, nor
the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unrcasonable searches and
seizures. The Court upheld, as reasonable under the Fourth Amendment,
admission at trial of evidence obained by an undercover informant to whom
@ defendant spoke without knowledyve that he was in the employ of the police.
385 U.S. at 300-303. See also Lewis v. U.S., 385 U.S, 206 (1966) and

° Lopez v. U.S., 373 U.S, faq 7 E863). .
- 4»

“f
i . . . . “y . 4
'

. . _
NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 67
V 86296 Docid:32989628 Page 6

Memorandum J. B. Hotis to Mr. Dalbey
RE: FBI AUTHORITY IN DOMESTIC.
: INTELLIGENCE MATTERS

- a? .
Moreover, the Supreme Court in U.S. v. White, 401 U.S. 745
(1971), recently held that the use of secret informants does not violate
any constitutionally justifiable expectation of privacy under the Fourth
Amendment, even when an informant uses electronic equipment to transmit
his conversations with defendants to other agents.

if the use of undercover government informants without a
warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment and invade a defendant's
. *  .  gonstitulionally justifiable expectations of privacy, Hoffa v. U. S., Supra,
a and such informants may write down their conversations with derendants
and testify concerning them, or simultaneously record and transmit such
conversations to others, who may testify against them, On Lee v. U.S.,
343 U.S, 747 (1952); U.S. v. White, supra, then clear iy, mere visual

tt 't Ta win nhs wh
survoeillancal of plaintiffs i in ye ain vicw Cy peverert Midies at pusic Pyeketorney iOS

would not violate their constitutional rights,

Tt would seem that those who elect to present their views actively
in the public arena deliberately expose themselves to the public. See
Associated Press v, Walker, 388 U.S. 130 (1967), Any recording of their
activities by the delendants does not invade their privacy any more than

'* does a newspaper, radio, or television story, and,:- indeed, much less since
any information compiled is usable and effective only through court action.
Tatum v. Laird, 444 F2d 947, 957 (D.C. Cir. 1971).

More difficult questions are presented where the investigation
delves into the private affairs of the individuals or organizations. But
even here, the courts have generally sustained ow procedures so long as
they comport with the restrictions of the Fourth, Fifth anc: Sixth Amendme
The Fifth Avenue Peace Parade Committee, et. al. v. J. Edear Hoover.
et, al., 70 Civ. 2646 HRT, decided February 16, 19727 (examination o1 _
bank records) U.S. v. Gerhart, 275 F. Supp. 443 (S.D. W. Va. 1967)
(examination of bank records); Minker v. U.S... 312 F2d 632 (3d Cir. 156
(trash covers); Cohen v. U.S., 378 F2d 751 (Suir Cir. 1967) Quail cover a“
U.S. v. Van Leeuwen, 397 UL S. 249 (1970) (detention and examination of
packages in the mail); Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364 (1968) (seizure of

union records); Toffa vy. ULS., Supra; U.S. v. White, supra; (use of
informants), TS

ts,

,


N |

Memorandum J. B. Hotis to Mr. Dalbey
Re: FBI AUTHORITY IN DOMESTIC
’ INTELLIGENCE MATTERS

e

oa

In summary, if is premature to say that the First Amendment
Jine of cases, dealing with the "chilling" concept offers any substantial

* impediment to our intelligence investigations. There is less reason for

optimism, however, with regard to congressional intervention. We

should be prepared, therefore, to meet arguments regarding the need |

_. for outside supervision. —The sound answer, which should satisfy
governmental needs and individual rights, is found in tight internal
controls and carefully developed guidelines. : :

+ te,

« 6.

“Te,

te

W 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 69


v ao 7
eo oy '

ae a

‘ “a ,

« t
* . eo.
4 ‘
. an .
1S . .
.

pei 0 tts 7) gosrrron PAPER EN

ot re -- DOMESTIC TNPELLIGENCE DIVISION

wt a os
‘ : . : . ote
res at. ‘
oe. mt, : BR
ot : ‘. . ee . . d :
n 3 elt : ‘ Se
i a
tory . .
oy . “ “ * . .
wt? : ‘ , . a
uC oe . ” *
2 : . .
. 7 . . -
ran ees Ps
rare ao ‘
“othe ti . .
fe ib. :
te tat tj .
aa she . .
’ % a . f we . «
cet } : ot foley :
wont te zoe tds 2 fet OVER T EY : ee .
“ste i . og £1 etm timemanenems : _ . , . _
nt : ts; SoA "tN Bb cet, : :
thea, . . a . . . . ! 74 : ies ~ .
the te A a ae Tae rs: wt. :
: _ “at . . . 7 org a
gcc ; . i This paver deals with the conduct by the ZBI of
if ‘ . ~ “7 + > Lore 1 win — ” ~
oy tntcliigvence-type Lovestigations supervised by the Donestie
ey . we wh dae rye oe . ~" . ~ Arrears wk pan
vf Wintelhiwence Divisich., Authority tov these inyvesticaticus
‘dosus d ontiined, including situations where there

r s
Jay, Criteria and controls and
inplenenting this anthority a

or Tar

—  G8-WGS75° BD °

ENCLOSURE ;

LweS8296 Docld:32089628 Page ZO

1

. oe

a _  * SABLE OF CONTENTS

.
ne

LNUGLLIGENCE COLLECTION

AUTHORITY - eee
Congressional Enactments 7 ced

e

TECLIMENTATION OF AUTHOR Ty

*

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 71

Prosidential Dircetives
Policy Instructions of Attorney General
dae

Knelonal Security Councll Directives
Interagency Agreenents .

Administenvive Index |
hevolubicnary Groups
Ezamemist Groups :

Subversive, Revolutionary and Extremist Ind

Unatilisated iIndividuais

¥soionage and Foreign Intelligence -Invest

Restrictions on tnvestigntions
Lnvormation Storage and Retvieval
Diegemination

a

g 5

iwiecuals

27

pas,

20
42

12
43

*- 43

L4
iS
17
19
19
ak
al
23
25

ae de eT tate fm eae eeRaitirtn etetatatin te mete an Sheet tT TR ee

aw

LS ihn |


v
: ~ . =
ve Pa & . . - ~
t * .
’ . :
if a .
‘ «
‘ . ¢ .
’
a,
. eet ; .
+
.
* .
af . . . » . oe

aud documonted. Yet, our work in fathering intelligence has.
been the subjcet of continuing eritician from segments of the

” presa Ww th chaxges baing Maas OWA the YET is conducting without
authority security snveatigntions of pexsons who axe not in
violation of the law. It has also been charged that our intel
Ligence collection 14 uncontsolicd, capricious and dwells on

" yersonet idtougnarantes withous there holug any security interest
iuvolvod,
convoy vhe Lelos “tagrecen on that the PBI is wantonly disregarding

the privacy of citimens, have heen published.

‘dndividuals without cloareout authority and tight controls.
Critios
their attention and bullt them up into what is represented as

“the end product of soourity ineastigations with political over-
‘tones, In these instances, the items upon which such importance

was placed have been Sragmentary intcliigence from substantive

. ; . a
Lwuesnsse-ociitomnm Page

have taken fratments of intelligence which have come to

| mpl?
ALL INFORMATION CONT. INED ;

YHITLLIGENCE COLLECTION - HEREL 15 eS Dr i
ne RO OE LE EE LS LT AE * ‘DATE o) BY. 5 2. *

The FBIts intelligence function its well established

Fragmente of information, distorted and twisted to

*«

/

Tho FBI does not conduct security investigations of

. . ‘
.

“gnvestigations and could not be viewed in their real ‘significance,
except as they fit dnto the overall perspective of the case.. ,
This" is indicative of the danger of using phecomeat intelligence
taken ont of context; properly uscd, however, intelligence

is'a Legitinote and necessary part of all security investigations,
oO ‘gnteliigence is information and the collection of it is
inseparable ‘from efficient investigative operations. fn Lact the
twomsinvestds gation and intelliccnce-sarve mutualty dependent.

in the security field, it is vital that the Federal

Government detect factors which have a direct he aring on

-poedipia wintatione af Yaw rotated

tn thn arnt hea aw Aaatwuation
wee

of the Government. Intelligence developed to identify individuals
Who have a propensity fer sevalutionary ex racial violence ox
_have saffiliations with subversive or revoluticnary groups is

.

_ essential in the enforcement of tho Laws sievned to protect the
integsity of the Governnent. Intollisence is alse essential to
‘the detection of attempts or conspiracies to move against the
Governnent, actions which may themselves bo crimes,

’ No constitutional provisions, statutory enactnents

or judicial milange have attempted to deprive lew enforcement

of its intelligence function, although various attempts have

¢
Fanaa nner URS I ore elteadh.arc lived tote alts

'
’
~

.

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page f3

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 730

“boon made to define or limit the ereas encompassed by
sutelligence and particularly ‘the techniques of collection.
Yt fa niso recognized that some intelligence gathering =
‘Retivitios way have an incidental "chilling" cffect on individual
eitizens. The spectre of the Governuent's investigatory | ,
presence may cause a reaction in citizens Snhibiting the
oxorcise of their £ulk constitutional vights. Therefore,
Re balance between the requirements of the Government and the

‘constitutional rights of citizens aust be maintained.

The intelligence ‘fanction of dnvestigntion, must be

hadh enagennabla art cprne dent Tt vesdag dn acona and dutanatsw
= BOS 2M BOOt : 7 e

te eee nee nee Se ee oe tee oe we ener Stee Sloe

with the seriousness of the provision it seeks to enforce.
Et is neither reasoneble nor practieal te Launch an agereodive
sntoliigence collcection effort concerning thd activities of those

Me, - . :
who ‘might potentially vielate a local antilittering ordinance.

Detection of & cons ELACY to bomb the White House, on the . ...4-
okt ef
sather hand, ecrvtntnly justifies a continuous and intensive non °

Sntelligence effort to identify the participants and ends

mowledce of any specific plans.

. eo

owes

NW 88298 Docld:32989628 Page 74

ww: Bndividuals and organizations, commensurate with the imned!

“yt ta wandatory that a Governaont “protect ‘4

integrity and this has been recognised by judicial
authorities. Ordinary crimes victiuizo an individuals ox
groups; crimes against tho exiatenes of the governucnt ,
victinize sockety. Carrying these erines to thely uitinate
__ produces tha uwitinate crime against soclety--the destructicn
of that socicty.

«

Xt £8 clear that the agpixations of most revolutionary

Lod

z.

groups fax cxeeed their capability te achieve thei» witimate
objectives. They axe, hovever, quite capable of nf otoding
the ante arity of the democratic systea by legsaecr acts and, if
not discouraged ox thyarted, might xehh accumulate tho wait
and powor Zas more deaisi ive action. The draumetie success cf
the Castro vevolution is a sufficient osenbe: Conseguontiy,
continuing intelligences ¢ollection rolats Lng to ALL revolutionary
Lie
‘threat bosed, is imperative to proper vigilance,

The FBI serves as a prime preducer of Entelligence
for the Executive Branch. Over the years it has providad

information concerning hostile actions directed against the U. &.

. - 4 a . = .

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 75 . |
po a


bee Ne

* ey

=by- foreign governdents, their intelligence services and others

=) meting in theix behalf, On the domestic secene the FDI hag

-. ponotvated conspiracics ranging from the conminist underground
to the hooded night viders of the Klan who torrorized our “
biack eltizons. But, in the 1960's explosive ehanges occurred
Ss the intexnal security problems faced by the country. These
_chaniios were ‘reflected in both the scope and nature of the
~. TebEts response and iu the intelligence requircuentsa levied
_upoh the FSi by the Executive Branch. - _ ,
‘In the decade ef the 60's, social change and upheaval

added to. the critical arens of the Teits intelligence

toute

 Sofecponsibilities the problens of rovolutionary and extremist
“ activities. Amexica jas stunned by violent student disruptions,
- "bombings and riots. Spanning the decade were clvil vights |
* protests, veactions against then, and tragically, the burning
‘ and looting of Watts in i665 and the conflagrations in Detroit,
“Hewark: and Washington, DBD. €. And, what had becn the youthful
idealisn of the emerging new left in the 1962 Port Huron

“a, Statement’ was drowned out by the obscene Veatherman war cries

.


ta they took thedy revolution to the streets of Chicago in.

£969 during their "Days of Rage.” .

As the tide of cringe and dissuption swelled, it
brought with it now and pressing problems on the domestic
security scone. IY denestic security investigations inereaced
accoxdingly. Thora was also an Lumodiate inerense in FBE
intoeliigence: collection concernins the dawlessness and violent
tactics of thege coving revolutionary elenents.

. Yntelilirconcse collestion was es ssenti,nd in contending
with thesa new domeatic security problona. This feet wag
recognized by the reports of two Presidential Couniesions.
he report of the Nattosat Advis oxy Comission on cs vil Disexders

' Cernex Commission, 1968) stressed thet the absences of accurate

dvformation kefore and during disex dexa Grenteg apgeLal control

bo. probleus . naa cuphugized that law onforcencnt organientions
| must devalop the moans to obtain adequate anteliseence Lor
Planning purposes wAd that law enfoxcement should “EBay ~~

tbe

avaluato, analy 20 And disseminate information on potential as -

| | Well ag actual civil disorders." Cook

| a a,

| . ar

|

f ; A .

' . ‘

ke ° ‘ . :
-” ~ 6 = '

_NW-88296_Docld:32989628 Page tf


7 Biudleriy, the President's Comission on Campus)” oo
Unrest Ci970) took enecial note of the need for intelligence ;
-4n effedtive law enforcenent. The Commission stated in its
xoport, “Zt is an undoubted fact that on soue caupuses there
are men and women who plot, all too often successiully, ta
burn and Lomb, and someti on to waim and kill." The ropoxrt

concluded that the bes BA sometines the only, means

| aw enforceneat has to thvart or prevent such pilots is - :
through “clandestine intelligence work." Sy tre!

- Provention is the very essence of the proper use

af tntotitacean. My be forewarned ie to be pineed in a

ee ee ee ee

position to carry out cousternenswres to meet 2 threat. During

the mass octions and violent confront catdons of the 1960's,

¥YBI inteli igence collection vas erys padi awed in Glssenination
of tnformition ta other govexnmen nt age) Se This antolligence
provided thea with an essential vorking tool to contend with
‘public disoxders and activitics cf 2 revolutionary nature.

fos. In a memorandum to the Director of the FBI, 9/14/67,
da.
Attorney. General Clark stressod the importance of-inteliligence.

Tha Attorney General asserted. “It is most important that

a . . . ’ -

—NW-88296—Docld:32989628 Page 78 . ; a

. ' .
~»

you use the maxinum avatlablo ‘resources, investigative and
inteliinence, to collect and report oli facts bearing upon .
(rLlot activity)." Elaborating on this point, he said, "In
these circumstances we must be cortain that every attempt ts

boing wade to got all information bearing upon thess problous;

to take every step possible to determine whether the xrLobting

ut

' £8 pro~plannad og organized; end, 42 so, to determine the

identity of the paopla and interests involved; aud to deter

¢
this activity by prompt and vigorous Legal acticn." The

Attorney General's evaluation of the importanec of
autalligence in this Anstanes applies with ogunl foreaa to

other oreas of the FBI's socurity work.

Looe . Xn Decenber, 1967, the Department of Jastice, aware

o£ the high priority of intelligence in deniing vith civil

disorders, ercated the iIncex-Division Information Unit. his

“$s a repositery for "reports which velate to individual or _—
x T
j. ta
organivational activities which may play a part in instigating ;
i. .

oY spreading eivil dicordorsa" and includes intelliscence

‘relating te black power and blnek nationalist exganizations,

oa ~w Bmw &
. 4 .
LNMILB8296 Docid:32989628 Page 79 _ _ ee

. tee ' @ ‘ Ts ¢ x ) °
officors and tienbors thereof, racial incidents throughout” ”.

the country, aud any specific dowonstrations which are
.boing planned and are of such nature 23 te render them
subject to tho possibility of violonco." Quick rotrioval
of this dnteliicenee was emphasized through the use of ceuputers.
Attorney General Mitchcll wrote to the FRI Directecr
on Kay 17, 1971, concerning the Entelligenca Evaluation
Committee, creatcd to tnalyza and evaluate intelligones for
the guidance of the White House and other departuents of
“the Uxcoutive Branch. In this memorandum, the Attorney Goneral
stated, "Intensitied activi¢ties on the part of militant é
eegproups here An Washington, Dp. G., and elsewhere in the country
cLoarly point: up the nead: not only for the gathering of
the highest ‘qualdty intoliigence available but also for an
, expert analysis and evaluation of the dutolligence product

‘itself. ee a Ss

sf : eT, wo HG

ay
4

Ye

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 80 oo .

oe

; co AUTIORITY
- 4 ALL FBI investigations and intolligence collection
functions in the internal security field are based on
authorizations in Congressional enactments, Presidential

| directives, policy instructions of the Attorney General,

yo” National Security Council directives and interagency agree~

ments as set forth below.

Congressional Enactments

Attorney General direction of EBI - 28 U0. 8.
Code, Section 533 a

freason ~ 18 U. S. Code, Section 2381
Cu. S. Constitution, Article YIi, Section 3)

Ree lion and tknsurrectien -. 18 U. 5. Code,
ection 2383

soot

pe . Seditious Conspiracy = 18 U; S. Code, Section 2384

Advocating violent overthrow of Government =
18 U. S. Code, Section 2385 {Smith Act)

Sedition - 18 U. S. Code, Sections 2387, 2388,
2391

—*

“4 Recruiting for armed hostilities ‘against Ue So. =
: : 18 U. 8. Code, Section 2389

Des ignation “of Organizations as "commnunist-action"
s , and of Individuals as members of such groups

after hearings by Subversive Activities Ccntrol
Board « 50 U. S, Code, Sections 781-798 as sumended
or repealed (Internal Security Act of 1950, Subchapter
XY, called Subversive Activitics Control Act of 1950
and amendments by Communist Control Act of 1954)
See also Executive Order 11505 below

- 10 - .


_ Espionage ~ 18 ‘JU. 8s. code, Section 792 et seq.
Sabotage ~ 18 U. S. Code, Section ‘2151 et seq.

Fer .
: : Private Correspondence with Foreign Governments «
ar] 18 U. 8S. Code, Section 953 (Logan Act)
Registration of Foreign Agents ~ 22 U. 5S. Code,
Sections G1i-621
Atomic Energy Act of 1954 “= 42 U. S. Code,
Section 2122
HWeportation for Subversive Activities = 8 U. 8S. Code,
Section 1481 (Immirration and Nationality Act 1952}
eo Possession, threatened use, or use of explosives

-£or illicit purposes » 18 U. S,.. Code, Section 844

fravel in or use of facility of interstate commerce
-te promote or incite riot, to commit violence in
furtherance of riot or to abet others in inciting

x participating im a viet. ~ 34 3G,

231~233 » 245, 2101-2102

8, Toade, Sacrwisns
Neutyality Matters ~ 18 U. S. Code, Sections 956,

Q58-9623 22 U. S. Code, Sections 1934, 401
(iunitions Control Act)

. . i + .
; +  Yntelligence exchange with CIA ~ 50 U. S. Code,
, Section 403 (National Security Act) -

' Presidential Directives

Directive of the President - 6/26/39

directing that investigation of all espionage, _— ae
. ;counterespionage, and sabotage matters are handled

Directive of the President - 9/6/39
_requesting the Attorney General to instruct FBI
.» to take charge of investigative matters relating
_%to espionage, sabotage, and violations of the
neutrality regulations,

m4

-NWi-88296—Docld:32989623-Page 82. i

oy i . ° ‘“ co . an? . * . tas ‘ ¥ * , 3 bs
ca 6
ote . weeth. , ote * “eo, wee ty . aad % . On .
‘ . Presidential Directive « 1/8/43

yeiterated instructions of previous directive of
. 9/6/39 and requested law enforcement officers,
patriotic organisations and individuals turn over

“| to FBI all information regarding espionage,

sabotage and violations of neutrality regulations.

Presidential Directive ~ 7/24/50
reiterated substance of 9/6/29 and 1/8/43 directives,
noting they provided for FBI to take charge of
investigative work in matters relating to espionage,
Sabotage, subversive activities and related matters,

Pirective of President 12/15/59 -

+ referred to previous Presidential Directives

‘and added investigation by FEI 6£ violations
of Atomic Energy Act. . g

Executive Order 10450 4/27/53 , ~
established programs to insure that the employment
wud yotontion of apy Government emniovaa is clsariy
consistent with the interests of national security.
Requires check of FLI Fingerprint Files and, in
cases where derogatory information develops, :-FBI
conducis a fuLi-Lield investigation, .

Executive Order 11665 7/2/71 , ; :
a calls for Subversive Activities Control Board,

* ‘+ When petitioned by the Atterney
; determine after hearings if any

General, to
organization is

totalitarian, fascist, communist, subversive, or
whether it has adopted a policy of advocating the
eonmmission of acts of force or violence to deny
others their Constitutional or statutory rights.
By inference, the FBI, as investigative arm of

’ the Attorney General, would develop evidence for
hearings required, Also, FBI, by inference, would
develop evidence of membership in such organiza.
tions, which may be basis for denial of Government

employment,

‘ . ’

Policy Instructions of Attorney General

September 14, 1967:
General Ramsey Clark

° .

~ 12.

instructions
for FBI to investigate possibility
of conspiracy to plan, promote’, or aggravate riot activity.

.

of then Attorney

Internal

Febuary 18, 1969: instructions from the Assistant
Attorney General,

Security Division, for

¥FBL to obtain information concerning possibility that
underlying subversive groups were giving illegal
directions or guidance to numerous campus disorders.

(other policy instructions from Attorney General and
Department have been received, amplifying points set
forth above; many o# these concerned specific cases.)

Mational Security Council Directives

Comemen.

Tnteora

Cat aby

Direetive on Internal Security,’ Harch 23, 1949,
establishing Interdepartmental Intelligence
Committec (IIC) responsible to ccordinnte investiga~

tion of comestic espionage,

counterespionage, sabotage,

subversion and other related intelligence matters
affecting internal security. FBI represented on TIC.

United States
Septenber 15,
CLA and other
a ts rio Y ,. aan st
USLB to provi
with forcigs

roncy Agreements

Dolimitations Agreement sis
to establis
anvestigations by members
subversian,

dagen 23,

espionage,

a
i

1

e
fn

Lgs9,

ntellicen

5
O58,

Board: (USTR) established

Re
to maintain coordination peivveeu
intelligence agencies,

FRI a member of

Gomnestic intelligence for correlation

telligence,

and

of espionage,

ned by LIC members

n jurisdiction in
counters
sabotage and to provide

for exchange of information on above matters.

rbi-Secret Service Agreonent signed November 26,
i971, to provide for transmittal of information
from FBI to Secret Service regarding individuals

and organisations

ponsitics,

who,

the safety cf the President

iad

becs
represent or may

use of their pro-

represent a danger to
and certain other persons,

L

Coot, “TLE: SENTATION OF AuTTION LITY

wt The eriteria and guidelines for FBI investigations

_ave furnished to the field in p33 “Manuas. of Instructions,"
the "¥, B. I. Handbook, " and in Letters to all Special Agents
in Charge. In addition, ins” ve tions and guidance are given

abs eres

to the field in Headquarters: cormuaications on specific cases.
Compliance with oxdterie aie jutaelines is obtained by super-
“vision in both the ficld and ‘at ‘Bureau Headquarters. In
“gddition, regular inspections of field and Headquarters
Divisions assure that Bureau policies concerning investigae=
tions are being followed. | eet
In the security field, the basic responsibility of

the BE is to investigate revolutionary organizations dedicated
to. the violent overthrow or destruction of the united States
Government. These include old=line Marxist groups, for exanple,
the Communist Party, USA, and the Trotskyist Socialist Workers
‘Party: and such new revolutionary groups as the Students for

2 Penooratic Society, the Black Panther Party and the Weatherman,
in the investigation of subvona ye ondividuals a determination

is made of the dangerousness of the individual and efforts are

made te obtain evidence of violations of any applicable

~ 14.

SHIVERS Braet rere re Sone ae

NW 88296 Docid: 32989628 Page 85


—NW'88296 Docid:32989628 Page 86

we ee ‘ tations oo “e as

‘Faderval, laws. To assist in cataloguing the level of 7 7 a To

dangerousness of these individuals and to retrieve quickly
wt . -
information concerning them, the Domestic Intelligence

Division maintains « card file known as the Administrative

Tadex.

“Adwinistrative Index ; wo Ses

Peni te eee re area a cat ar

Title Yi of the Internal Security Act of 1950
. ‘
(Baevrrvency Detention Act) before it was repeanied on
Sepronber 25, 1971, provided for emergency detention of
giubvarsive individuals in the event of a national emergency .
To iuploment that provision of the act, the FBI and the . . .
Department of Justice maintained the Security Index. This
Indes was, of course, discontinued with the repeal of the
Emov roney Detention het. * By memorandum of October aes 1971,
however, the Attornzsy General noted that the repeal of
Tithe IY “does not alter or Limit ‘the FBI's authority and
ceesponsibility to xecord, file and index information secured"
4m this ficld and concurred in the establishment of an
nduinistrative index to assist in “making readily retrievable
and available the results of its (the FBI's) investigations

into subversive activities.”


— NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 87

f

‘To ‘this end, such’ an index (called Adéx’) was-

.

,

instituted for making quickly retrievable information on
four ‘edtegorios of individuals in order of dangerousness:

1) ‘National leaders of revolutionary or extremist
groups, nenbors who have exhibited a propensity for violence,
menbers with training in sabotage, espionage, or guerrilla
warfare,. wnesfiliated revolutionaries with a propensity
for violence, and revolutionaries with access to key facilities.

Iiy) =6Secondary leadership of revolutionary and
extromist eroups, scetive members of these groups; and
umatfilieated ravnlntionaries or extremists with a propensity
for violence sreinst property rather than persons,

EnY Ratkeand-file membars of rovolutionary ErOUps —
within the previcus five years, leatiers of fronts for revolue-

tionary groupe, and individuals with revolutionary ideologies
dikely in a national emergency to commit acts of espionage,
‘sabotage, or terrorism.

IV) Persons likely ‘to assist, financially or
otherwise, revolutionary groups, or persons in a position to
influence others to commit acts inimical to the national defense.

Investigation of an individual is conducted to
determine whether or not he should, consistent with the

criteria of these categories, be listed on the Adex. If, as

ve? $

.

16 ~ ib

~


a) were ge ste Mt 7 ‘6 ‘ oe * ‘ a

the result of the investigation, it is determined he docs
not meet the criteria the. case is closed. If, on the
othe: hand, ho does mect the criteria, he is listed in
the Adex according to the determined derree of dangerous

ness. Caterory I cases continue under investigation for

as long as the individual Congr icits, to warrant that Category

Listing, When an individuake-.|../feved in Categories II,

ZI, and IV, however, the investigation is closed, subject
s 3 ? . & ,

*
to periodic reopening to verify his location, to dotermine

£

his activitios and to ascertain whether he still qualifies

for amgiueion ae the Addex. Frowiedun 46 mado Zor uperading,
7? . ory rs Se - 3] ue :
downgrading end puirging an individual from the Adex as his
x .

a

activities and level of dangerousness fluctuate.

nee E >

Revelutionsry Groups .
Starter arstnner tne fire wmmntanartg mein er oe yO

s

Investigations of individuals for a determination
of whether or not they meet the criteria for Adex generally
invalve their degree of affiliation with revolutionary and
extremist RYOUPS . fhe purpose of investigations of basic
revolutionary and neveloft typ¢ vgrouns ig to: (1) provide

intelligence to the Executive Branch which will enable the

_ President to fulfill his Constitutional responsibilities;

Ta greem

—NVE88296 Doclhd:32989628 Page 86

°
r)
é
ana
.
4
-
a
~

(2) detect developing conspiracies to violate substantive
laws and initiate prosecutive ‘action whenevor possible to
prevent such conspiracies from being carried out; and

(8) develop evidence necessary for the Attorney General to
file petitions before the Subversive Acti vities Control
Board in accordance with provisions of the internal Security
Act of 1950 and Executive Order 11605. _
. The criteria, guidelines and restrictions on the
investigations of revolutionary groups are outlined below:

Investigation is initiated uvon vreceint of
information indicating that crranization
auvucates Uvex throw o2 Goversaont on tnonges

im activity to deny others their Constitutional |
or statutory rights.

-{nvestigation is conducted to establish aims
and objectives, location and sime, dcmination
and control by hostile foreign power, identities

- of all Jcaders and members, . ,

In vegard to their front groups and organizations
which they have infiltyated: cs

Investigation is initiated upon reccipt of

information that organization is douinated,
» GControlicd or influenced to substantial

degree by revolutionary organization.”

Investigation is conducted to determine
degree of infiltration, aims and objectives,
location and size and jaentities of ald
deaders.

4
a

yo.
ra

__NW88296_Docid:32989628 Page 89.


Extrvoenist Groups ; , soo Soe

The purpose of investigations of white hate

and black extremist organizations is to: rob provide
intelligence to the Executive Branch which will enable

the President to fulfill his Constitutional responsibilities;
and (2) detect developing conspiracies to violate substantive
laws and initinto prosecutive action whenever possible to
prevent such conspivacies from being carried out. Investiga=
tions of white hate groups are confined to those which have
actually or allegedly committed or have conspired to commit
nets or violence or nave adopivd ua pulisy of advocating oz)
inciting the use of violence to deny others their rights
under the Constitution. Investigations of black extremist .
organizations concern those groups which take extremist,
anti. 8, Government, anti-white positions and whose
activities have involved them or may involve them in civil

‘unrest and/or subversive activity.

Subversive, Revolutionary and Extremist Individuals

. Individuals referred to as subversives are
generally affiliated with old«line basic revolutionary
organizations; those termed revolutionaries are usually new

left types; and those called extremists are fundamentally

-NW-88296 Docld:32989628 Page 90

"


involved in violent or revolutionary activities bas od on’
| » ‘
_wace. ‘Procedures for the investigation of these types of

| 4ndividuals are similar and the criteria are outlined as

follows: oo

’

: . - Membership in a basic revolut lonary organiza-~
«tion .
See Beaton 2

Espousing the @¥é0,

ter aot * io 4
Special evainlve atone” 7 ox leadership train~
ing, in a@ revolutionary group

individuals having access to key facilities
who heve been members of. a revolutionary
group at any time .

Pavenne with revalukionnarvy. terrorist,
anarchistic of extremist belie’s who are
; tikeLly to seize up on a national emergency
. - + to endanger public s atety .

Individuals who have actually or, allegedly

committed, conspired to commit, or adopted
o _ policy to commit acts of violence to deny
|e .. Others their rights under the Constitution

Extremists and revolutionaries who have

demonstrated a propensity for violence,

have involved or may involve themselves

in civil unrest, or who advocate violent
overthrow of the Government

Persons who influence others to engage in:
acts inimical to the ~-hasnal defense or
who are Likely to fe-rteh financial or other
assistance to revolutionary or extremist
elements bacause of their sympathies,
associations or ideologics

~20—-

NW 85296 Docid:32989028 Page 91

—_ Unateiniatod Individuals)
: In the areas of revolutionary (new left) and
extremist activities, some investigations are conducted
of individuals whe are not affiliated with organizations,
Investigation of an individual is undertaken when informa-

tion is received that the person:

Is a revolutionary and apyexes to the ‘ oe
Weatherman idcology of advocniibs a _—
«- revolution now and uses terrorist tactics

in furtherance of revolution

Is a revolutionary or extremist and
Gemonstrates by acts om statciuonts
propensity for violence againat property

Exhibits revolutionay or extremist
_ adeology and is Lik opportunity
ve “an national emergency 5 espionage,
. sabotage, terrorism or -o -@ interfere
with Federal or local governments or
- defense efforts a

\« - Influences others to engage
3Snimical to national defenss ox Likely
‘ to furnish Financial cx other assistance
' to revolutionary or extremist elements

Espionage and Foreign Intelligence Investigations
The mission of the FBI in the foreign intelligence
ficld is onc of counter intelliven ec. ‘he objectives and

‘ priorities of counterintelligcnuce have been variously stated

and evaluated. Generally, these objectives may be Listed in

declining priority as follows: (¢1) the detection and

.

- 4

—NVi68296_Docld:37989628 Page 92


‘identitication of intelligence operations and agents;
(2) the penetration of these operations for the purpose
of goptrol and the development of intelligence information;
(8) neutralization of hostile intelligence operations through
disruption and disinformation; and, €4) prosecution. Whatever
the assigned priority, the overall objective is to deny access
to information sought by whotever pre cetical means are available.
Foreign intelligence investigations are grounded in
“the Espionage statute and related inaws including the Registra-
tion and Atomic Energy Acts. Indi vid ial inves tigations are
initiated usually on the basis of 2 known ox suspected connec
tion With «x foreign intelligence service, foroign country or
subversive organization with such conneetions, Since these
investigations emanate from various censitive sources and.
invélve apecial considerat oe extensive criteria and
Limitations are defined and enumerated in current instructions
X¥n general terns, the governing criteria are designed
to preclude initiation and continunnece of investigations which
are not Justified. The Limitations are designed to control
the scope of investigation in order to “insure secur lity of our

interests through close supervisory serutiny.

og

__NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 93


. Pr > Sater et . ? at

Nestyictions on Investirentions

‘ PBI guidelines go beyond the rules for opening,

~~ .

investigating and closing causes; they also impose restrictions -
to make cextain that we do not violate the constitutional
vights cf any individual and to preclude investigations from

becoming "fishing expeditions." ; In the security field these

+ re

are some of the restrictions vycc%. iare applied:

' Security cnases are evaluated.continually
to determine if we sre fulfilling our
responsibilities. Those cases not
warranting further investigation are
closed promptly, . .

There are no investigations ot members

of an organization which does not advocate

use of force to bring about cxisting charres

in the Government, Exemples are the Socialist ,

'Party,;cthe Independent Workers of the World
and Independence Party of Puerto, Rico.
t

ae . Persons arrested during disruptive demonstra=

see tions are identified since circumstances of
an arrest, in some cases, may indicate 2
propensity for violence. However, a mere
arrest in connection with a demonstration is
an insutficient basis in itself for security
investigation, The arrest must be coupled
with a demonstrated propensity for violence
ox with subversive or revolutionary activity
on the part of the individual arrested. :
Yhen it is determinec: that a security subject
is a member of the armed services, the
investigation is discontinued immediately and
the military advised.

Civil rights organizations are not investigated,
“ . - :

Pa

| NW 88296 Dochd:32989628 Page 94

ae “es . “0 ry
: mo

4
{
’
\ .
‘
ry

St Stee es tigee are Cee

oy 4 8 ge ee > .
. . . : 4 . oe oe .

Ambassadors or heads of permanent missions
to the United Nations are not investigated.

., . No surveillances are conducted at ‘the

poe White House, the Capitol, the Suprome Court, ;
the House and Sonate Office Buildings or . eo
the United Nations. :

No telephone or microphone surveillances
gare operated without prior written .
= - gpproval of the Attor-., jeneral, Slot ae oH,

"ty ae

”

we gat

Bureau authority iseeauzkfo: Lor: cree

an Investigations of officials and diplomatic
_ . ‘xYepresentatives of foreign countries.

s . . ' (Department of State authority is also

- required.) oo

co - : X¥nvestigation of communist infiltration. -:
' OF Q POLITICAL Orpuusearviviis

_o
tet

| oa Developing sources connected with an
| Oo institution of learning,

i : 7 Interviews of subjects of active, current
v " .. pecurity investigations, , .

Investigations of faculty membors, If

approval is granted, only established

sources functioning in an administrative
_ capacity may be contacted on the campus.
' Other established sources and informants
must be contacted away from the campus.
Contacts with students, graduste students
and faculty members must alse have Bureau
wuthority. a ;

: Interviews of labor Leaders and persons in
‘.educational, mass media or publishing fields.

These examples demonstrate a consciousness of the need

toimpose limitations on investigations and the continuing imposie

-" &

tion of them. ot

to a oe Pee


So llataeth CRP ete eet tet uae ade : teoetns
wis 4 * *. eee a eases a wht. we oe sete ets a Eon,

Information Storare and Retrieval
The storage and retrieval of information is a
_.bas&e operational necessity of any investigative or
; ‘4ntelligence=gathering agency. Procedures within the Fpl

Lor these functions provide for written records of informa

4

tion received from a variety, iytonrceseconfidential

informants; confidential, .2 ASIEN techniques, and open
. Wista. oe

wot

_ sources=-and the storage ox tian S Sgorma ation in different
types of files, These include active investigative files
on organizations and individuals and sone general files.
These “raw" files are maintained both at the Seat of Governe
ment and in’ the various field offices, “Information jn the
“V£iles is thoroughly indexed so that data can be retrieved.
| In the intelligence field, when an allegation
within the jurisdiction of the FBI is received, a case on
“an individual ox on an organization may be opened, cepending
- on the quality of the allegation, Nonspecific information
that is received on an individual or organization is placed
in the pertinent file, if one exists, or is placed in a
general file if the organizateu: Es individual is not the

subject of a specific file,

a o 25 on”

.

These files are an integral part of the intelligence-
gathering function. By the yery nature of the FBI's assignment
4q coordinate internal security information, the maintenance
of data over a period of time is required and it is necessary

that a system for retrieving this information be used,

wo

information that may note®stps
Birla .
: SES en es

gation (the derogatory information received may not be germane
to a matter within the FBI's jurisdiction), the Attorneys
General have long taken the position that these Ziles should
not be available for public serutiny. incalculable damage
to individual reputations could result from the disclosure
- of single items of snformation without knowing the full
background concerning the receipt of a particular item and
the context within whith it was recorded, oo, . .
| . The late Justice Robert Jackson, in his capacity
as Attorney General, wrote in 1941; .

Disclosure of information contained in the
veports (FBI files) might also be the
‘ grossest kind of injustice to innocent
individuals. Invest’-; lies reports include
Leads and suspicions. .*n? cometines even
; the statements of malicious or. misinformed
.; people. Even though later and more conplete
xeports exonerate the individuais, the use
of particular or selected reports might .
constitute the grossest injustice, and we all
: ‘know a correction never catches up with an
;* accusation, | ‘

J v . ‘

/ - 26 ~

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 97 , 7 ‘


- Dissemination

; The Bureau's general- policy ‘on dissemination is
that information developed by or coming to the attention
| ef the FBI is promptly referred to nll agencies of the

Executive Branch of the Federnl Government having a

potentiey? interest in it | a (Ee ent for taking

bility is apparent or known." ais S adey is in accordance
with numerous formal agreements entered into between the

Bureau and other Government agencies, It is also in

“NY,

MEGOTEanCS WATh Deocidentiat Aivactivas obligating the
Bureau to act as clea ring house for information affecting
the internal security of the uU. &. 7
Despite this general Liberal policy of dissemina~
tion, we have recognized that with regard to highly sensitive
information a determination must be made on an individual
' basis as to what information should be disseminated and how
'4t should be transmitted. The degree of sensitivity and/or
tho security classification will determine Levol of disseminae
tion to any interested agency 2 Bai the method of transmittal.
In certain instances, sensitive information may be furnished
to a high-level official with a request that dissemination \
in his sgency be restricted to his personnel on a need~to~know
basis. Such information might be disseminated by secure teletype,
courier, liaison, and where necessary,: by secure telephone,
Information furnished orally is confirmed in writing.
ce 7 : ¥T
’ w AT om ‘ .

—NW88296 Docid:32989628 Page 98

. eae cs . 1 : so. toe Loo.
wwe fe Oe DO ee De Pe SR | a
i . oe * ‘ cet .

The Attorney General . d“vugust 7, 1973
se ¢ : °
Director, FR
\ en ; . moe
——- o {NED
_ -Ascovy oF eBI ULISNICTION Sg rNFORMATION CONTA
wi _ : veers . als WiC Be:
AND} AUTHORITY 13. UGMESTIC pmrenn £5 Ne eA dy
INVELLIGLNCE INViSTIGATIONS : pare (°/8:0L:

: During ou: mecting on July 26 , 1978, you reforr ed to a discussion
* you hed with Senator Charles RicC. Mathias, de,, of Maryland during your con-
firmation hearings as to the statutory anthority of the FBI and the Repartinent of
dusties in the ficld of domestic intelivonce invesil ige vtions, You then asked
hiv, Wiliiera D, Ruckelohsus to work vith the FBlin weighing the pros and cons
with regard to statutery authority in this area. Drentioned that research was
wGaanys eas nied USE in u ives ares Buyout cat the e phuowut tai oe hd duu Lisent re wwuuad Ue han

touch with

then: wearin of our

the rooulis of cur concidovration and Sindings within the FB!.

x

th Rie. Ruchelshaus with rerord to this inolicr when we have compicted

atay?

Actually, a study has been going on in the FRI for more than two.
years as to the scope cf Ful jurisdiction and authority, in domestic inteligence~_
investigations, When Mir. Ls Patrick Grey, 1, was designated as Acting
Directoy of the FEI; he instructed that a position paper be prenared concern-
ing the jurisdiction and authority of the FBI to conduct domestic intelicence
investipations, A position papor was prepared which in essence stated tha
authority of the FBI] in this Held is based on leginistive enactraonts, even
though we may have publicly relicd heavily con Presidential divectives as the
basis fox such authority. Bir. Gray ordered an in-depth study made of the
position and in Aucust, 1972, a detailed report was furnished to him. The
following is a summery of that report.

Over a period of several inonths there were a number of public
statements questioning authority and eatery wi of the FBI to conduct comestic
intel gence-type investinutions, particularly where there is no clear-cut
legislative authority apparent. One of the most searching inquirics was con-
teined in a paper presented by Professor John T..UMIE at a two~ lay conference
at Princcton University in Octobcr, 1971, sponso ored by ‘the Ce ‘clniaittee f for Public
Justice, .

, oe
lod YW wie
ENCLOSURE
NW 88296 Docld:32989626 Page 99 ‘


NW 88796 Docld:32989628 Page 100

The Attorney General

- 4 '

A major thrust of Professor Eli's paper concerned FRI authority
derived from Icvislative enactments ag opposed to that derived from Presidential
directives, beginning with a directive issued by Prosident Roosevelt in
September, 1939, Protcssor EWU is of the opinion thet the 1939 directive,
which was reiterated on three subsequent occasions, was megnified by the
FRI from its original purpose to & deiinitive order to conduct intelligence-type
investigations,

Senator Sam J. Ervin, as you know, had beon probing into the
native and extent of FRI intelugence-type investigations. Sunator Ervin had
even, announced that he intended to propose legislation to prohibit the vB!
from investigating any person without that individusi's concent, unless the
Government has reason to believe that person hes committed a crime or is
about fo commit a crime. Other Congreesmen indicated a similar Inicrest
in FRI investi¢ative activitics.

Our study revealed that the FBI had declared publicly over a
long pericd of Lime that iia responsibilities in the dcmestic intelligences feid
are authurized under logislative enactments, Presidential ¢ riVeSs
instructions of the Attorney General. ‘fhe Presidential divcetives are v bviously
the 1) directive dated September 6, 1989, and. veiterated January 8, 1943;

duly 24, 1950; and Decembor 15, 1933, and 2) Exceutlive Order 10456 ciated
' April 27, 1953 (and amended but not yet implemented by Executive Ordar
11605 dated duly 2, 1971).

in carefully analyzing the longuage of the first directive, deted
September 6, 1939, and considering that the subsequent dircetives sre all
hinged on that ene, we believe that there is o misconception as to the extent
of jurisdiction or authority conveyed to the Fi by these directives. It
appears that while the 1639 directive fixed responsibility on the FE to handle
espionage, saboiage, ond neutrality matters, it did not convey any authority
or jurisdiction which tho FOI did not already have from legislative cnaetisents.
lids difficult to read into this directive or in ony of those which fcllowed any
authority to conduct intelligence-type Investivations which would or could
not be conducted under an umbrella of legislative enactments.

nr

The Attorney General

st

ce

: As a matter of historical fact, President Reesevelt in August,
1936, did request former Director 2. Edgar lieover to condact investigations
of subversive activitios in this country, Inchicing commumicm and faselem,
This request, however, was a confidential oral request and there is deubt
that any record of it was nade outside the FI. This request, or Presidential
mandate, was based, incidantally, an the fuct that the law provided thet the
EBL could conduct such investigaiions if the Gcerctary of Siate should sa
request. ,

The study reverled that while the 1628 ct seq, cireclives did not
grant any special intelliiconce-gathering suthoarity to the FLI, we were reapon-
sible under {hese directives to eclsct all intcliicenee information furnished

by iccal, state, and Fudural lew o pcenlent aencies and patriotie cltizens
and to sift and coordinaie ali suel: iswormation icz indications of subversive

activity covered by Fedural stahuites.

:
The study eouchided that the FRI lias the rospotisibility to con-

ductwhatever investigations nre macussary to determing if stetutes relating
to eepionape, sabotuge, Insurrection or vebciiion, eedilicn, seditious con~
spiraey, navocacy of overthrowing ¢ PIMA
alfecting the national sccvwrity hove beun viclted. In this connecticn we
note that in o letter dated September 14, 1967, tie Repartnent of Justice

, advised that the FSI is ecntinusliy alert to the prvublem of rceureing riots

: end is submitting intel rence x: inviment of dusties concarn~
ing such activity. This letter enumerated several Federal statutes and
stated thease could be appllaable in using maximum avallshla resources,
investigative and intelivronce, to collect and report all fects beariny on
the question of schemes er conspiracies fo plim, promote or eegravate riot
activity.

~*

In other words, the Mcepartment was requesting all possfble
intelligence-type invecticalive ccuvity based on tha existence ef curtain
statutes. We see this as being uo dificzent frum our intclicence-type
investioations relating to plans of sroups or individuals to overthrow,
destroy, interfere with ox threaten the survival of effective operation of
national, state, and local rovernments, ‘

_NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 104 . - toe ,

NW 88296 Décld:32989628 Page 102

The Allorney General

Based on this study, we belleve that hod there never been a
single one of the Presidential directives in question the FRI would heve
conducted end will, through necessity, continue to conduct the same intelli~
genee-type investi«itions es were conducted from 1939 to the present date,
We also beHeve, however, that in order to counter the criticism end skepti-
olism of such Individuals as Professor EMI end Senator fam J. Ervin that
ean up-to-date Exceutive ordu should ho issued clearly ostablishing a need
for inislligunce-typs investiedions and delineating a clear authority for the
FBI to conduct stech investiguiicns based on guidelines ostablished by the
Attorney Goneral aud adhering io constitulional principles.

The study concluded with tuo basic recommendations.

1} That the Deparinruent of dustice be requested to sponser comprehensive
Jegisluiion spelling cut the Fal's investicative authority in the collection of

N aN ee 2th

wNteiccerae dintus tue ee@bieanee tas LiL Cede tec. and: 2 ond
RELI L CE AD SELON Z US LAUR LEAR ENGULEA EY LAL, GP GAL CAEL

“Department of dustice be requssted to seck a comprehensive Executive order
7 —

which would cover guy posmilis en statutory authoxity and Executive
necessity in protection of the national sceurlty.

At fies wlance these recomunendations may appear to cantradict
our position that we already, have steiutery suihority to conduct security-type
investivations; that ihis being the case we do not need additional legislative
enactinenis, nox co we need an Mxeeutive crder. But being realistic we think
that the basie statuics upon which we rely for our anthovity to conduct
doracsiic intellirence ons need tc be wpdated to Mt 1975 needs.

Tithe 15 U.5.0 mS 26938, 2904, and 2385 relate to the nutional security,
but the lecislative iiatory of 2302 and 28¢4 indicates that they were designed

for ihe Civil War ava, not the Lwentioth Century, and Scetion 2385 has been
reduced to afracile shell by the Supreme Court. Shese statutes are unques~
fionably still valid, but updating is certainly indicated, The bills introduced

as Ui. 6046 and &. 1400 in ihe Sird Congress appear to contain Jencuage which
should till cur stulislery necds, except parhaps for those croups, such as the
Ku Rhus lan, which de not seok to overthrow the Government, but never-
theless ave totalitavian in nutuve and seck to deprive constitutionally guaranteed
rights. :

wa .

ate

—NW88296 Docid:32989628 Page 103

The Attorney General

As to the need for an Executive order, we thins that two lesues
are involved. We have statutery authority, but what we need is a definitive
requirement from the President as io the nalure and type of intellicence data
he requirca in the pursuit of his responsibilities based on our statudory
authority. In other words, there is a need, from eur standpoint, for be oth
authoritative and definitive guidelines. The statutes give us the authority
The Exceutive ‘order would define ovr national security objectives.

: Members of Congrese, including such men as Senator Reber? C.
Byrd of West Virginia, have proposed legici:tion to spell out jurisdiction and
authority of the FLLin this Geld, It would sypear that tis President would
rather spell out his own requirements in an Executive order instead of having
Congress tell him what the FBI might do to help him fulfil his oblivalions and
responsibilinies as President.

The political climate of suspicion and distrus
diselosures coming out of the Watergate hearing 20

to getting any such Exccutive ordex signed in the immociete future. Uowever,
the rafionsle is nevertheless valid aad when serutinized closely, the language
in the Kxccutive order we hereinaller propose establishes definitive euidelines
which have heretofore been unclear, itis my belief that we should go forward
with this. .

We therefore proposa and recomracnd that en Executive order
along the folowing lines be submitted to the F yhite licuse with a st.ong
recommendation for approval. “he language which follows is inereiy to
{lustrate the type of Executive order which we think would be appropriate
and dacs not necessarily represent an ideal format ov style whieh should
be subrultied to the White House.

EXECUTIVE ORDER

"Whereas the Constitution of the United States waa estdblushed to
insure, among other things, domestic tranquility; to provide for the common
defonse; and to promots the genoral welfare lor the people of the United Stafes:
and

NW 60296 Docld:32989628 Page 104 O°

.

The Attorney General

a4

"Whereas the President of the United States has the constitutionally
' imposed responsibility of defending the Constitution and the existence of the
Government thereunder; and

"Whereas there have been continuing unlawful acts of violence
perpetraicd against the Government of the United States or against citizens
of the United States or against persons entitled to the protection of the
United Stutes thereby endangering the domestic tranquility, threatening the
common defense, and jeopardizing the genoral welfare of the people of the
United States; and

"Whereas the Congress has enacted laws prohibiting acts such as’
treason, sodition, sabotage, espionare, insurrection and rebellion, seditious
vunopisucy, Civil divuvedivace, riviing, ussussinuiion, kidmaping, aeprival
of civil rights, and conspiracies to commit such acts; and |

‘ ;

“Whereas the President of the United States as Chief Executive
in the maintenance of the Government thereundcr must have intelligence
information for appropriate decisions in the discharge of his constitutionally
imposed responsibilities; ‘ .

"Now by euthority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes
of the United States and in the interest of orderly cperation of this Government
end in furtherance of the domestic tranquility, common defense, and general
welfare of the people of the United States it is ordered that;

"The Attorney General prepare and issue guidelines, coniorming
to the principles of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and outlining the
necessary direction, coordination, ond guidance of investigations to assure
that the Mederal Burcau of Investigailon provides on a continuing basis
intelligence information essential to the execution of laws portaining to sub~
versive activity and other such activity affecting the national security,
domestic tranquility, and general welfare of the United States."

t

The Nation has been going through a time of terror. The concept
of urban pucrrilla terrorism has been adepted by various extremist clements
in the United Stutes. Bombings of public buildings and national institutions;


’

. the e concet of Investigation ont

1
er

The Attorney General . -

- 4

killing of police officers who, by their uniform, are a symbol of the democratic
esteblishincnt; hijacking of airerafi in furtherance of revolutionary movements;
terrorist assaults on fovcign diyiomatic personnel and establishments; and open
declaration of war on cur form of frovernment exe only a fow of the violent acts
which have becn perpetruied by domestic subversives who seek to destroy or
seriously cripple our Government. Tcrrorist puerrilla attacks which were
once confined to far away places <caid related to problems of no immediate con-
cern of ours are now possible in this country. Foreion terrorist groups in
collusion with domestic tcrrorists have laid plans for an sixport massacre of
the type which recently cecurred in Isvacl. Gther foreign terrorist elements
have laid pluns for terrorist attucins on Americ soll, Already one foreign
official has been assassinated, pessibly by terrorists.

Yt would be folly to aiopt an Investigative policy based on
"wren there is reason to bclicve ae crime
involving the national sceuvity beorr itted. The FBI must
obviously anticipate ihe crimes eribed clove. We believe that in

order for the Government to be In position.to defend itself ceainst revolu-
onary and terrorist cfforis to austnoy it, the FRI must have suificient
invostigative authority to conduct intelligencc-type investigations not
normally associated with erlforcement cf the stitutes. In other words we
think the Frevident has the inherent Dxeeutive power to expand by further
defining the EU's inv ost cative authority to onuble it to develop advance
information concerniny the plans and aspirations cf terrovists end revolu-
tionarics who seek to overthrow or destroy the Government. However, ve
also believe that such expanded authority inust be formally set forth in an
Uxecutive order and that this rcecinmendation is responsive in the Attorney
General's expressed interest in levying more formal guidelines to our work
in aveas where definition is not now cloar . ee

We consider the issuance of a new Executive order delinett ae
cur jurisdiction, authority, and cosponsibility to gather and report intelligence
information relating to the ne ational security to be a very important end hich
priority matter. We believe the issuance of guidelines by the Attorney General
under Title 28, Section 533, United States Code, to be equally important.

vos . . . .

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 105

je

The Attorney General

For your infovmation, our own investigative guidelines as con-
tained in our Manual of Insiructions relating to domestic subversive investiga
tions have beon campletely rewzitten to corierm with the concept that our
Gouestic intelligcuee-type bivestications ave based on Federal statutes. These
euidelines provides that in each instance, the domestic intelligence investigation
must be predicated on information indicating that the orranization or individual
g angosed in aciivity which could involve a violation of specific statutes relating
1a the national sceurity., A cony of the new guidelines was previously provided
the Department of dustice in connection with the recuest of Senator Edward i.

to the
- Konandy to obtain a copy of the Fi's Section 87 of the Manual of Instructions.
Khe citective date of the new guidelines was August 1, 1873. ; _
. - oe, et
l- The Deputy Attorney General tp
:

| NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 106

EB Prem cere ney “poner tnmine nce nt

ak

Some Ne eae er

boll haraliaiaiaemnachebietintdetedibedeeddahinianteendbaetenanmanietamemin


| ,
Tut

sSsoc, Dir,
Dep. AD Adm.

st. Dir.
dmin,
bmp. syst.
tt. Affairs
coat
iles & Com.

zen, Inv,

dent.
Inspection ___,
, Intell,
4 Laboratory
'* Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv.

"raining

ral Coun,

‘phone Rm. _.

| bctor Sec’y __

de. Dv. Fication a great deal of sensitivity attaches to these figures A

FBeBH QosidG2989628 Page 107

- Me. W. R. Wannall
Me. W. O. Cregar
- Legal Counsel Division

Nee
t

The Attorney General April 22, 1975
(1-Mr, Farrington)
Director, FBI 1 - Mr. &. W. Larson, Jr. v4
mdRYS -

oP
On ie STATES SEALE SELECT COMITITEE
1 RTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

oe Eee

aren v1 ant COMNTAT en
v +
oe rs Vill STEP L alot
: ron 1) 9/0) _Bi

Reference is made to a letter” from the Senate Select
Commitree dated March 19, 1975, requesting certain documents
and orher information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the
Committee ic the original of a memorandum which constitutes
a resnonse to one of the requests sét forth in referenced

letter. A copy of this memorandum ir enclosed for your LE .
records, a
, t 4 “| fA, 0
Enelocures (2) aM Aaprecodk by HE. Clach.4, / ler)
VES Dele 7 be. vel “a eg efor  basites
62-116395 of a4

pr
- @ nae Fim BA

S,
NOTE: The Senate Select Committee has made a request for
titles and number of FBI field office Agents in the internal
security and counterintelligence field as well as the percentage
of manpower assigned in these areas,. The Administrative Division
has compiled this information. However, it is not felt this
data should be furnished formally in a written response to the
Committee. This data can be classified "Confidential" under
yc Executive Order 11652. Over and above this technieal, classi-

EWL:ekw (|: a)

since should rad be made public or otherwise fall _ ens G
915 *
V NOTE CONTINUED PAGES ait 29,
_aneLosile! yy, we a
Te, ne - —
ae oe AO wh ,
a * >
hfe )
wee in

MAIL ROOM[_] TELETYPE unIT(_]

GPO 934-346


o |

¢

The Attorney General

NOTE CONTINUED:

hands of hostile foreign intelligence services, they would
reveal the current capability the FBI employs in the field of
counterintelligence against the total foreign threat.

It is noted that a precedent exists for making the
information available for review only at FBINQ,.” By letterhead
memorandum 4/8/75 we advised the Committee that w would not
furnish them a requested list of names and titles , of all
Intelligence Division personnel at FBIHQ down‘to, and including
Unit Chiefs together with a number of personnel ‘below that level
but that this list would be made available for review by
appropriately cleared personnel of the Committee staff at
FBIHQ.

| NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 108


‘ i
1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall
1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar
2 - Legal Counsel Division
(1-Mr. Farrington)
foril 21, 1975

UTED STATRE SIIATE SELECY COLMTGSIE TO 1 - Mr. E,W.
SiUDY COVERMCEGEAL OPERATIONS TTT RESPaCL Larson, Jr.)
TO DWTELLIGECe acvivirris

RES ORGANTZATIOS

Reforencea i: race tn letter cared March 19, 1975,
+9 tho Attngney General from rhe Chairman of cavrioned Commitrec
vhich enelo ad cerrain tequecrs for deeunent: and orhor infor-
ration Eran the Pecoral Bureau of Tnvectinarion.

Under Trem ITT entitled “Te-anigarion,” saragranh ¢
roquectead at tha Field level, rhe titles and number af FRE
ficld offiee frentr arcinned +o imrormal ceeurl+y, Intel licence
enllectinn, an fog counrorintellisesce mattors, oserations, or
activities, toczorher vith the nercentaye of total Avent manhour:
dovered +o cuch mertorc, onerarionc, and aativirias,

_ Yern ate miviced that a currenr carvey of all FRI
field offiear has been race te obtain the dara roquerred.
Sines this Inferrarien £ concivere ro be highly con: itive,
ie 4 not being furnishe- diroetly to rhe Commivree: hoverer,
the requerted data ir boing maintained im the Inrelligonce
Divi: ion ot FRIEQ and ic available for revier by anrovriatcly

Me” = narod sorconnel of the Commicrce :raf® won regee:t. |
1 - The Attorney General tle °
EVIL: ele \. _ JS Ais
(ay oe
sneer NTO oth nl HE
Asoc. Dir, een tp ea sol S
Dep. AD Adm. H2=116395 ee 7:
eae Inv. pate
sst. Dir:

Admin, _
Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. i 4 )

Gen. Inv. hk et ~ wh”
lent. . ‘\ y Re . 3

hea Hour if yy

Intell.

Laboratory
Plan, & Eval. _

Spec. Inv. cs
oy oan e

‘ HCLO OSU RE, “ yj £ ;
Telephone Rm. ; os . ‘ ; ;
Director See'y = MAIL ROOM] Ss TELETYPE unrt () be 7 . VS & ZZ fp wi Z ~ apo ase
NW 882796: Docld:32989628 Page 109 oe

Trsining

Legal Coun.

,


Tt ety
fy

ean nn,

wend.

- ad . A
. . ” ema . oe P

peli, ae ee a a Ei ee alt TS,


w eadient

- + «
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
SAY 1962 EDITION
GBA GEN, KEG, NO, 27

’
@ $010-106

UNITED STATES GO v ERNMENT

herewith, to the above request.

intelligence collection and counterintelligence matters.
«." been constructed in the traditional two categories of internal security and
Intelligence collection (informants) is included. in the
; e 2 data for both of the other categories as appropriate,

: & ‘counterintelligence.

Memorandum
ro: MR. WALSH
FROM : LL, C. GROOVER
Mee AK

4/3/75

DATE:

Te

_ SUBJECT: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Reference Legal Counsel to J. B. Adams memorandum
dated 3/20/75 captioned as above and letter of Senator Frank Church
dated 3/19/75.

”

Assoc. Dir.
Dep, AD Ader. _

Dep. AD Inv.
iAsst. Dir:

“Admin,
Comp. Syst. —_
Ext. Afisirs —_
Files & Com.
Gen, inv.
ident.

Inspection ____
Intell.
Leboratory
Pilon. & Evel.

Spec. inv.

Training

Legal Coun. —
Telephone Ra. —
Director See’y —_

Relet requested, among other things, the titles and number
of FBI field office agents assigned to internal security, intelligence

collection and/or counterintelligence matters, operations or activities,
together with the percent of total agent man-hours devoted to such matters,
operations and activities ( page 3, item ITIC of relet).

The purpose of this memorandum is to forward to ‘he
Counsel Division, through the Intelligence Division, the Tespouse, a

Legal
tached

It is noted the request specifically mentions internal security, |

RECOMMENDATION:

Enclosure

Our response

\

has —

That this memorandum with enclosure be forwarded to the
Intelligence Division for review, classification and approval and, thereafter,
forwarded to the Legal Counsel Division which is coordinating replies to

. the Senate Select Committee.

1 - Mr. Wannall
1 - Mr. Mintz

1 - Mr.

BY

ackson

t.
JIC:jiab /
eee

HERSLH 5 VW CLES

eile,

aA TMD
8 ote

"42989628 Page ' itt

SEE INTELLIGENCE DIVISION

ADDENDUM PAGE TWO

_ SEE LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION
ADDENDUM PAGE THREE “ae
»

co tena ts tes th 8


ry ~ =
_ . , td) rd)

Memorandum to Mr. Walsh
Re: Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence Activities

ADDENDUM: Intelligence Division, WOC:aso, 4/4/75
The Intelligence Division has reviewed the attached fisures

~ prepared by the Administrative Division. Under the criteria of the current
Classification Act it would be impossible to justify classification of these
figures; however, should they be made public or fall into the hands of a
hostile foreign intelligence service, it would reveal the current capability
the FBI employs in the field of counterintelligence against the total foreign
threat, In view of the above, the Intelligence Division strongly recommends
that the Legal Counsel Division discuss this with the staff of the Senate
Select Committee pointing out the vulnerability implicit in this attachment
in an effort to have the Committee withdraw its request identified as III C.

ee, yo ie

RP EELIS Deca sZIEIG28 Page M2

“ne eee ch percan tine etlapEinhtet idea iethanb alias LDh, «acetaabmas senimashed, ots =


41405

Keparding the observations of the mutellicence Division
concerning the making available the amount of manpowor dedicated te
gounterintellicence and domestic intelligence worl: in the Por, the
Legal Couusel Division has the foliowing observations:

(BH Based on our analysis and conversations this
- ra .. +f Division has bed with Fred B. Criffith of the Inspection Division, it -
: we pppenrs that the information contained in this meriorandum may be
hie AS of ul Plassified confidential under. Executive order 11652.

(2) Befors making any determination as to whether wo
raake such information available to the Senate Select Commulttee, it |
‘would sppeat we ehould determina from CIA what their response to :
: such a request will be so that our position and that of CIA will be

consistent in this area. In thie recard SA Paul ¥. Daly has contacted
Leon F. Schwartz, Ligison Section of Intelligence Division, and roquested
he dstermine from CIA what their position in this regard is.

'
(3) It is not believed that we should take a hard and inst
position that thig information not be made avatlable to the Committee or
| that we make an effort to have the Committee withdraw their request for
| this information. We should rather develop some fallback position such
|

i

}

4

j

as that this information will be made avaliable to the Chairman of the
Committee or will be made available during an oral briefing ,» ste.
1.

‘ %

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page | 113

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 5010-106
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN. REG. NO, 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

| 6
/ Memorandum (se

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AB*Aga™ ’
e val
As: olibk:

Comp. Syst. —
Ext. Affairs —_
Files & Com. —
Gen. Inv. ———
Ident.
Ins pec:

v

WM oT
\yo : Mr. Adams ot S9]

Sor

FROM : Legal Counsditi™ re od

someon Ganarre SELECT COMMITTEE
ONINTELLIGENCE A “ACTIVITIES Telophone Rm.
cee wees Director Sec’ “x
In connection with our investigations of staff members for a
captioned Committee, we have developed derogatory information on two
individuals which has been brought Specifically to the attention of William Miller,
Staff Director of the Committee, One of these involved Mrs. Diane Eloise
|LaVoy whose sister-in-law questioned her loyalty and declared she “does not
love America." The sister-in-law said Mrs. LaVoy constantly criticized the
U. S. Government and its policy and underlying weaknesses of our society.
Another individual said she was highly critical of CIA activities. This information
was pointed out to Miller on 3-25-75 when the results of the investigation were i
delivered to him, and he also was advised that the CIA would be furnished the same
data in accordance with our agreement concerning these matters. 4; oj
3

N
a

q
iE
On 3-24-75 and 3-28-75 results of the investigation co jeening
Mrs. Betty Dale Ellison were delivered to Miller and he was advised that a Za ©
supervisor with eight years of training and experience in psychiatric care states
he felt Mrs, Ellison needs psychological examination, He termed her a troubles
maker and said he would have fired her if he had the authority. He described
her definitely as a security risk due to her mental and emotional instability. 1a .
also was pointed. out to Miller that other former supervisors described her as
unstable when working under pressure and unable to get along with fellow empldjees.
io

Mop feo, 2

Miller was told that this information also would be furnished to CIA.

On 4-2-75 Miller advised Inspector Bowers he had considered the
matter involving Mrs, LaVoy and had discussed it with the Committee Chairman,
and they had decided to proceed with her as a staff member since they did not feel

he derogatory:remarks by her sister-in-law were sufficiently strong enough to
isqualify her since the remainder of the investigation was favorable.

“Ifo s 275° Yf

1 - Mr. Adams _ ‘REG: 1001. Mi Exceed
1 - Mr. Cleveland . 1- Mr. Steel
1 - Mr. Wannall “t= Mr. penringtor eae
1- Mr. Mintz 1- Mr. Bow ;
if 3 APR 22 1075 ‘
DWB:kjs (10) CONTINUED - 0k = ie nel i

LE 4 ate
NB 4288 Roeeta: 3, 628 Page 114

| eet OS ee ee


~ a
~ w so

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams Memo
RE: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Miller also advised on 4-2-5 that their review of the Ellison
investigation showed justifiable concern for her being cleared for the staff, and
he asked for any guidance we might give him. It was pointed out that the only
real solution to the situation seemed to be that she not be added to the staff.
Miller said he would appreciate any comments from the CIA also in this regard.
This request was conveyed to CIA by Section Chief William Cregar of the
Intelligence Division who subsequently advised that Charles Kane, Director of
Security, CIA, had reviewed the file on Ellison and agreed there was sufficient
cause to question her suitability for assignment to the Select Committee staff.
Kane stated CIA Director Colby concurred in this observation.

‘These views were conveyed to Miller on 4-9-75. Miller stated
at that time that they had resolved the situation by assigning Mrs. Ellison to
purely administrative tasks and that she would be fully isolated from any sensitive
or classified information in connection with her responsibilities.
RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

~ Uf
gol Y Q@

| NW 88296 Docid:32969628 Page 115


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 } 5010-106 »

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA GEN, REG. NO, 27 a
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT .

Assoc, Dir,

Dep. AD. pAdm. _

2» Memorandum nadie

TO

From :; Legal cosnadif—

Oo AL TNE ena, ; | & Evol. —
cTN 15 U

SUB went Coansnopy 75 ERE Spec. nv.

ee ) DATEL opty

ata
ge

ae
ae

Merrell
Pre

eo
é

m2
?

ae

OS Puy

Il Utf |

See Pure

1 - Mr. Hotis — a
1-Mr. Daa
Py Dati Hale

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs __

Mr. J. B. Adams pate: 3-21-75 Files & Com
Gen. Inv.

N

LO era ee.

Laboratory
Plan. & Eval.

sane ‘Coun.
On 3-19-75 Inspectors John B. Hotis, David W. Bowers, Phe. —

and Special Agent Paul V. Daly met with William Miller, Staff Director;

Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Chief Counsel; and Michael T. Epstein of

the Senate Select Committee (SSC) staff. During the meeting Mr. Schwarz

requested a briefing be arranged for staff members of SSC concerning the

operations of the Intelligence Division, that they be furnished copies of training —

documents pertaining to matters handled by the Intelligence Division, and that,

they be furnished a glossary of terms used in the intelligence field. He pointea| }

out the aforementioned material Woiild greatly assist in the SSC staff developing

an understanding of the Intelligence Division operations and hopefully prevent

misunderstandings or needless requests of the FBI.

Mr. Miller advised that Senators Frank Church and John Tower
intended to contact the Director in the immediate future to discuss arrangements
relating to the SSC's review of the FBI activities.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

(1) Intelligence Division review and where-possible make available

training documents relating to training concerning Intelligence Division “natters

and a glossary of terms used in the intelligence field, or recom mend a counter offer,

(2) Legal Analysis Office in conjunction with the Intelligence
Division arrange a briefing for Senate Select Committee staff members.

nr? BW ba - Wes fo~ he
aft me a En Sa 29
1-Mr. Adams i vil a7 APR 22 1975
1 - Mr. Wannall vi
1M Wanna “ee
1 - Mr. Farrington _ “Y,

ie
NW 68296 Docld:32989628 Page 116


OPTIONAL FORALNO, 10 yr
”

. 5010-106
GaSe mE. NO. 27 -
UNITED STATES ne @ Assoe, Dire

- Dep. AD Adm. —

( M emorandum no aia
Admin,

Comp. Syst. —.

TO : Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 4/17/75 Ext Aas —
Gen. Inv.

Went.

FROM : Legal Couns Oy no 16 ahh Ispeston __

ys CONDATEED tshoey

sATLO

sunecr SENATE SELE CT COMMITTEE pul eee 35809 pant He Sow Ie
ON INTELLIGENCE "> an al Bee

pare. = i“ ephone Rm. __

. irector Sec’y __

MORES wea rdsc ay
At 11:00 a.m. on April 17, 1975, Inspector John B. Hotis

Special Agent Paul V. Daly and I met with Deputy Attorney General Tyler ,,

and Associate Deputy Attorney General James Hutchinson at the request fh Le

of the Deputy Attorney General. 1g

Deputy Attorney General Tyler advised that he had been requested
by Burke Marshall and F.A.O. Schwarz, I, who are consultant and General
Counsel, respectively, for the Senate Select Committee, to meet with
him on Monday afternoon, April 21, 1975, to discuss matters relating
to the Committee's activities. The Deputy Attorney General said that he
has been personally acquainted with Mr. Marshall for a long time and also
is acquainted with Mr. Schwarz. He considered the possibility of having
a Bureau representative attend the meeting, but then decided it would be
best if he would meet with Marshall and Schwarz privately to determine
whether they desire to discuss details of the Committee's responsibilities
and if it became necessary, he would request the Bureau to send a

amie ~
representative to the meeting REC 44 O2 HG 3F% 1

The Deputy=Attdehey General said that he would, of course,
advise us orally or in writing of the results of hisxconferenc@ With Mr. Marshall
and Mr. Schwarz.

, H APR 22 1975

The Deputy Attorney General inquired as to the procedure
currently being employed in responding to the CSmmittee's requests
and Inspector Hotis explained the current procedures. I mentioned to the
Deputy Attorney General the existence of the Ad Hoc Committee of
Intelligence Agencies and suggested to him that he might desire to designate
a representative to attend those meetings in order to be on notice as to the
policies being developed by the White House and the intelligence community
in responding to Committee requests. I explained to him that James

vider otter, formerly Associate Deputy Attorney General, was the

1 - Mr. Wannall 1 - Mr. Moore Vigne
1 - Mr. Cregar 1 - Mr. Hotis ' a coe
9 8 47K. 1 - Mr. Mintz py i
DARE tata ce

CONTINUED - OVER

NW°88296 Docid:32969628 Page 117


Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

Department's representative on the Committee, but he has now been
reassigned to responsibilities at the White House. I told him that
Assistant Attorney General Scalia had been scheduled to attend the last
meeting of the Committee, although he was unable to attend. The
Deputy Attorney General said that he would discuss with Mr. Scalia
the possibility of having Mr. Scalia attend as the Department's
representative.

I asked the Deputy Attorney General whether he was undertaking
the principal responsibility in the Department for matters relating to the
Senate Select Committee and other committees that may be inquiring
into the FBI and he said that that was not clear as yet because the Attorney
General has taken a personal interest in these matters and it appeared that
the responsibilities are still fragmented within the Department. It was
his opinion that the responsibilities should be centralized and he appeared to be
willing to undertake that responsibility.

It was my impression that the Deputy Attorney General was
interested in being of assistance to the FBI in these matters and expressed
a willingness to cooperate by having the FEI participate as much as
possible with the Deputy Attorney General. ee

RECOMMENDATION:
at

spp - wa

For information.

NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page 113

. OPTICNAL FORM NAD. 10 * S010=106 .
Ps MAY 1962 EDITION \

: v asaccen, REG. 810. 27 CONFIDENTIAL . @ 7 - 7 .
“ UNITED’ STATES G@@.RNMENT , ” Assoc. Dir,
, e e@ : ZT ~ lr, #F B. Adams _* ep. asia ie -

Memorandum ee oe

Comf. Syst.

>
Ext. Affairs

TO a Mr. W. R. vannalig? ene ote DATE: 4/14/75 , . Files & Com, 22

Gan. Inv.

a Our oo 1L=- Mr. W. A. Branigan AP
FROM : W, A, Branag . 1-—-Mr. W. 0. Cregar .

“ag, ~~ . i - Mr ° Vv. H. Weimar certo ra
on Se, lve 7

SUBJECT: WILLIAM G, MILLER . Training
Is'- R a —_ : . Legal Coun.

_— Sen ste by 7

’ Telephone Rm.
SSR See’y
g on”
ie cca, wel cm caeery .
Mr. Willvan"G7 ier is the Staff“Director |

; oy)
for the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations. é
with respect to intelligence activities, On 10/5/73,
representatives of our Washington Field Office Gro)’
interviewed Mr, Miller, with Bureau approval, helative to
contacts he had nee with members of the Soviet Embassy,

Washington, D, C, t that time, Mr, Miller was the

Director of the Special Senate Committee to Terminate the

National Emergency. On that occasion he was most coopera~

tive, and upon being advised that the FBI's interest in
(Bovidt Embassy personnel focused more on their personalities

rather than Soviet policies] per se, Mr, Miller agreed to

be interviewed whenever the FBI felt such was necessary.

ain

-“

oo “WFO has recently conducted an interview with
Mr. Albert Ashton Lakeland, Jr., Hxecutive Assis#ant to
Senator Jacob Javits of New York, [relative to his pasi-:on-
tacts with Grigoriy A. Rapota, a former Third Seéretary . aN
assigned to the Soviet Embassy, Washington, D, C, Rapota 1
was a known officer of the Committee for State Security ,
(KGB), Political Branch (PB), who was extremely active on
Capitol HillYs)in the course of the interview with
Mr, Lakeland, he advised that among others Mr, William G.
Milier was known to, have had (umerous contacts with Soviet
Embassy personnel Although he was not able to stiitw w
certainty that Mf, Miller had ie in contact with Rape
laoSl Tela > BTsAPR OR 1975
WFO has now reauestedy eau through’ 3%

=

id

AY, an
. >
G08 hw!

.7

/- 23-0/
pBYS
0;

‘ e
jay its Legal Analysis Office obtain co urre re the CHTLPHaT* “say
i 3 of the aforementioned committe APR Eo of WFO to again -
Sas interview Mr, Miller csncetning, hig poss $phg contact with \
<<
hes i -fios~213148) (8) CONTINUED - OVER A f |
CONAIDENT T Adeyer ers cor rere tapi § LEGS a
~ VHWedangien, 5 | as AGAIN
rs (7) Classified by 5683 jl Wa: v
~ _. Exempt fram GDS, Categories 2 and 3 v
~ Date of lassifice cLON ingeeinite at aekeana,
~~
es - \Cecooys
ban ¥en 0, 0 ~ - SEERA NY Lon . .
Gurgecpumegs Clacece by Nb3¢r | tht

5 CsewsTupy !

28 Page 119 ani


we e " a . a .
qe | oo,
a ) conte :
. : cane poe 7
Memorandum to Mr. W. 2. Wannall
Res: William G, Miller

[i05-213145) fn

Rapota and possibly other Soviets, WFO has noted that

Mr, Miller is also known to have been in contact with

Aleksandr A, Kokorev, a First Secretary of the Soviet

Embassy, Washington, D., C., and a known officer of the

Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU). (s) i
{
{
||

' While Mr, Miller was most cooperative on the last
occasion he was interviewed by the FBI, it is noted he did
not provide any particularly significant information con-
cerning {the Soviets with whom he had contact, \VsWWhile it is
not known at this time whether he could presently provide
- meaningful information, an interview with him at this time,
when he is now the Staff Director of the Select Committee ;
to Study Governmental Operations, could well be untimely and -

indiscreet, . |
-} ACTION:
. (1) In view of impending contacts which will .be
had by FBIHQ with Mr, Miller, the purpose of this memorandum
is to draw attention to the fact that Mr. Miller has had
Cpast ‘contact with representatives of Soviet intelligence
services and may be continuing to have same, \(s)

ak P52
ye? yr ee pow |es?

(2) If you agree, there is attached a communication
to WFO captioned, "Grigoriy A, Rapota; IS - R (SOVEMB-
KGB)" which denys authority for an interview with Mr, Miller
at this time and instructs that office to promptly advise
FBIHQ of any additional contacts between Mr, Miller and
representatives of the Soviet Embassy, Washington, D, C,,
which may come to its attention. (S) — -

yd Ld
vi wee paler _coxwrnrrrar

ERE

ca

i See

=
peat)
ney a

vce

: NW'B8296~ Deeld?32989628 “Page 120


1 ~ Legal Counsel Division
1-Mr. W. R. Wannall
1-Mr. W. O. Cregar

Ths Attorney General April 10, 1975
i %
Director, FBI suet %
G Ao oy) ne
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE qe

we Wy aSLe
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES mar 8 pol 7 ep bin

area .

ig Py
Reference is made to a letter from the Senate Select Committce
dated March 19, 1975, requesting certain documents and ether information
from the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the Committee is
the "Intelligence Division Position Paper on Jurisdiction," dated February 13,
1975, setting forth a study and analysis of the investigative authority
granted by Presidential Directives, the National Security Council and Attorney
General instructions, as well as a list of statutes from which the FBI draws '
investigative jurisdiction in the security and intelligence area of operation.
Certain exhibits are extracted due io the "Third Ageney Rule," however,
approval for release is now being sought and the exhibits will be forwarded
as soon as possible. Certain names are delcted In the exhibits due to
privacy considerations.

Also enclosed with the jurisdiction paper is an original
memorandum for the Committee and one copy for your records.

Enclosures -3 ; by Bb at age ve se
TP $8 Van >
awd ALL: V v Lb men Ve SShC he » te, Lh AL fs 75 Vie
(6) , AG ew MY:
ng WORE BF 3 ~f
© Assoc. Dir, ‘ GE APR 25 1978
: ber nD teen “ ee 4 ome ae
| Asst. Dire: Lee 7? wr
Admin. iy a
Comp. Syst. aa Re sae ot Y
Ext. Affairs —_. " " ? an)
Files & Com, __ \v +
Gen, Inv. A a! ora
Ident. ——“RNGLOSURE INE i hoot ® hh. be p| an i
Inspection ___. * ug a to \a
Intell. t. ~ meek
Laboratory
Pion & Evel, © . i [pRTEA MATERIAL ATTACHED ——
Spec. Inv. he, ay, ay 'h a,
Training, Sf if } ? aes “
Legal Coun. 7 ~ .
aBeaegt  « “, .MaétRoom ff A unit (J Sh GPO 954-545
WW Hoctd:32989628 Page 121 at 4


1 - Legal Counsel Division
1~-Mr. W. R. Wannall
1- Mr. W. O. Cregar

April 10, 1975

<i on *v-
Wace yo UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
Ree TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Reference is made to letter dated March 19, 1975, to the
Attorney General from the Chairman of captioned Committee, which
enclosed certain requests for documents and other information from
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (EBI).

Attached is the FBI "Intelligence Division Position Paper
on Jurisdiction ,* dated February 13, 1975. which, though not specifically

named, falls within the spirit of the documents requested in the letter of
March 19, 1975.

The purpose of this paper is to set forth a study and analysis
of the investigative authority granted by the Presidential Directives, the
National Security Council and orders of the Attorney General, as well as
to Het statutes from which the FHI draws investigative jurisdiction in the
security and intclligence area of operation.

itis noted that certain exhibits are extracted. Extractions
were made because of "Third Agency Rule" requirements. Approvals
are being expeditiously sought and these exhibits will be made available
a5 scon 2s approvals are obisined, Certain names are deleted in the exhibits
duc to privacy conziderations.

yw We aro attempting to identify Items 1, 2, 3, and 4, of the
(“ examples cited in the attachment to your March 19th letter. When identified,

immediute consideration will be given to furnishing the Items to your
Assoc . Dir. Cormmitice Py

Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep, AD Inv. Qu 7

Asst, Dir: Enelesure | Beal) , in
Co Se «1- The Attorney General O y Pate .
Ext. Affairs > A y ;
spc Ae A | mi ae
Ineneetion _ |? ’ This document is prepared in response to-your Oa
Intell. request and is not for dissemination outside your Committee. \>
Pin & baba Its use is limited to official proceedings by your Committee

* Spec. Inv. and the con On not be disclosed mm vER AGED

Lowel over personnel wit

Telephone Rm. _.

- Dincin Sec'y — MAILROOM) TELETYPE unit [_] (ENCE TSUN Le *) VE le

=
NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 122 om

é Sih: Beas yOvA SS PRP. ¥ iy ~f if

be ev dig

April 1%, 1975

This is to acknowledge receipt of
classified material by letterhead memorandum
dated April 10,1975, from the Federal Bureau

of Investigation.
My: Senate LH.

} Committee on ene
Intelligence Activit:

’ NW 86296 Docid:32989628 Page 123


ah LevOo w2 Lor connate DLE

HORABIN [3 UWLASSIPIED

d
marine einen” @ — @ a
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT . Assoe. Dir.
1 - Mr. J. B. Adams Dees aDyin
Memorandum OLIN. tl Temkin @G—
‘ Comp. ‘syst. —.
TO :MR. W. R. wana pate: April 15, 1975 Ext Affales —
1 ~ Each Assistant Directoreer. ta.
4 Ident.
FROM :MR, w|piernoar 1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar ee
O- oS 1 - Mr. S. F. Phi lips, \\" Laboratory —_
a : Plon. & Eval. _
sumject: SENSTUDY 75, 1 a
ee et wll 4 172m Legal Coun

Cty > — & |
7 §o- sand, SER aA Ur
5 LAPR 28 1975 hed g ‘A ye

88296 Dochd:32989628 Page 124

oe.
a
=
QO

My memorandum to you 4/10/75, tickler copies as Telephone Rm —
above, advised of the formal establishment of a task foree 7°" **’—
called Project Senstudy 75 for the purpose of implementing responses
to requests for information from Senate and House Select Committees
on Intelligence Activities.

From time to time, requests will be made of various iC: i} }
Divisions at FBIHQ for assistance in preparing responses. The iN
Office of Legal Counsel has already contributed considerably in Ny
support of Senstudy 75 and is an integral part of the Project.

a,
Lt. -

In order that we may keep an up-to-date_record of the
cost to the Bureau in handling this Project, each Assistant Director
is requested to effect the necessary procedures to maintain such
records and by the third of each month furnish by routing slip to
W. 0. Cregar, Room 4063, JEH Building, the following information:
(1) Name of Division reporting; (2) Month for which reporting,
which will be month just ended; (3) Maim days devoted to Project
assistance, broken down by (a) Agent and (b) clerical, including
GS level for both Agent and clerical. An example submitted by
5/3/75 would be as follows: (1) GID; (2) Report for 4/75; (3)(a\ .
one-half day @ GS-16; one day @ GS-15; three days @ GS-14; (3)(b) ;
two days @ GS-7; two days @ GS-5, ‘

This is effective commencing 4/1/75 and first routing © |
slip report due 5/3/75 will be for the month of April, 1975.

If a Division has not participated during the preceding
month, merely submit a routing slip to this effect.

4INRECORDED COPY FILED IN

The cooperation of all is urged s0 that the necessary
cost data may be compiled each month. It is recognized that exact
figures will not be eggibte and that estimates will be most

practical and willogu® ECE DEC wer fy , AS - )
ACTION: For action as above by each Assistant Direct

62-11639 15 APR 22 1975
16395 APR wee ub

SFP:ekw (18) vf


SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 73 HERS Sl } py of

MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN, REG, NO. 27

Ng
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 5010-106
as £

UNITES' STATES GOVERNMENT 1 - Mr. N. P. Callahan a
i - Mr. J. B. Adams es
M emorandum 1 Bach Aseistant Director “if
i
ay} ‘A/10/75 Ext. Affairs
. DATE: Files & Com. —_
: Mr. W. R. Wanna, 1-Mr, T, J, Jenkins Gen. Inv.
* 1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar g ker
wp ins ction
Ww Cregar is ie
{ye gar aeDel a

. cto’
3 yu ie eee a

ot ey meee

AS \ ES ae
This memorandum records the formal es sidshment
a task force entitled Project Senstudy 75.

fet

The concept behind the establishment of this Projedt
is to develop a capability of implementing requests received
from Select Committees of the Congress in a comprehensive and
timely fashion but yet allow the Bureau to continue to conduct
its day-to-day business in as normal a manner as possible.

We believe that by creating this facility we will be able to
meet the requirements of these Select Committees with the

exception df the research that will have to be done in the
substantive Divisions.

While the Project will direct internal work and
related liaison with the intelligence community and the

Cont. Syst.

Laborator:
Plan. & Eval. —

Training

Legal Coun.
ian im.

Dire va y—

JS _

em

4

White House staff, we envision the Legal Analysis Unit Office - ~

of Legal Counsel Division as continuing to be the primary
point of direct contact with the Select Committees of the
Congress. They will receive all requests and deliver all
responses to these Committees. In addition, they will meet
with the staffs of the Committees to insure the reasonableness
of requests. If necessary, they will call upon the expertise
of the substantive Division for determination as to whether

a proposed request from the Committees can be responded to
within a reasonable period of time and within the capabilities
of the FBI's information retrieval syst . mite

FEC 100 6 - Ife BF

At the present time folr Supervisors have been

UNRECORDED COPY FILED IN %

delegated to wotk exlusively on the Project :* -They are a=?

follows: .
oe a _ TZ APR 28 1975
The Project Mattager wild be Section: =Chief William 0.

Cregar, CI-2 Section, Intelligence, Division. “His duties wrt! =a

encompass the review of all incoming requests from the Select
Committees in an effort to identify policy questions;

ah: . . * by
woc: Imhlw& Bi. . ry
(18) Hah P CONTINUED - OVER \
“Ey vf
L J

APR 2.3 1975

»} Dochd:32989628 Page 125


Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall "
Re: Senstudy 75

ambiguities requiring recontact with Committee staffs; the
assignment of research responsibilities to substantive Divisions;
following such responsibilities to insure timely responses;

as well as representing the FBI on the Executive Committee

of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group for Congressional Review of

the Intelligence Community. Assistant Director John A. Mintz is
also a member of the Executive Committee. This latter responsi-
bility will provide Cregar and Mintz with direct liaison not
only with senior officials of the intelligence community but
also with the President's counsel.

Mr. Elmer W. Larson, Unit Chief, Training Unit, IS-3
Section, Intelligence Division will act as Cregar's Number One
Man; will administer the work of the Project; and act in the
absence of Cregar.

Seymor F. Phillips, Unit Chief, Civil Disorders
Reporting Unit, IS-1 Section, Intelligence Division will serve
as the Review Coordinator for the Project. His responsibilities
will be to review all research; coordinate all responses; be
available to consult with substantive Divisions as to proper
form of our responses; identify any conflicts in FBI positions
where several Divisions are responding to a particular question;
as well as to insure the quality, completeness and adequacy
of responses to Select Committees requests. Additionally,
Phillips will be responsible for the preparation of abstracts
to be furnished to the Interagency Registry maintained at CIA
Headquarters. This Registry established by the Executive Committee
of the Ad Hoc Group at the suggestion of and with the concurrence
of the White House will serve as the coordinating mechanism
for the entire intelligence community.

Mr. Leon F. Schwartz, Liaison Officer with CIA, CI-4
Section, Intelligence Division will function as the Liaison
Officer with the intelligence community responsible for coordi-
nating and,.clearing all information under the third agency rule
where FBI responses are of interest to or are of a proprietary
interest to other agencies of the intelligence community. Schwartz
will serve as the Bureau's representative on the Ad Hoc Coordinating
Group for Congressional Review of the Intelligence Community.

-2- CONTINUED - OVER

_ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 126


Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall
Re: Senstudy 75

Because of the White House insistence that all requests
and responses be completely coordinated and available for review
by White House representatives, it is imperative that the Project
have a self-sustained records facility to insure immediate access
to requests received from and responses furnished to the Select
Committees. In addition, in those instances where certain FBI
documents furnished to the Select Committees must be sanitized
(excised), it is imperative this records facility not only retain
copies of the sanitized documents but also copies of the original
text. For these reasons a senior clerical employee has been
requested to function as a Records Manager for the Project.

In addition to the above, there will be stenographic
and clerical personnel assigned to the Project to support the
work of the Bureau Supervisors. We have not committed any more
personnel to the Project than are absolutely necessary at the
present time. Should the requests of the Select Committees
require additional personnel, appropriate memoranda will be
submitted with a complete justification for additional personnel
assigned to the Project.

Although the physical space for the Project is
limited, all personnel connected with Project Senstudy 75
will be located in Room 4063, J. Edgar Hoover Building. This
space is physically located within the Intelligence Division.

As a matter of interest, Mr. James Wilderotter,
Associate Counsel to the President, has requested that should
any member of the intelligence community get requests from other
Committees of the Congress which impact on the intelligence
community; could be of interest to the White House;or are of such
sensitivity that coordination is required, copies of both the
requests and an abstract of the responses should be made
available to the Interagency Registry.

' ACTION:.

For information and record purposes.

We Wy

ot »- 2 iy
NW 66296 Dochi:32989628 Page 127


: Assoc. Dir.

Sf

[ (ar

Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep. AD Inv.
Asst. Dir:
Admin,
Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs ___
Files & Com,
Gen. Inv.
Ident.
Inspection
Intell.

Laborotory —__
Plon. & Eval. _
Spee. Inv.

Training

Legot Coun.

Telephone Rm. __.

2 — Legal Counsel Division
(l-Nr, Farrington)
1 Mr. W. R. Wannall
1 = tir. We. O; Cregar
’ April 9, 1975

The Attornéy General

“Ot

Director, FBI ALD TUPORMATTON CONTALNED

— HORBIN 15 ILACIIVIED,
} "er ‘2
UNITED STATES \SIRATE SELECT COMMITTEE pai) [1 a/o¢_ ve SQ. Rem) dae

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ;

ee er are

Mee

Reference is made to a letter from the Sonate
Select Committee dated March 19, 1975, requesting certain
doecunents and other information from the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI),

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the
Committee is the original of A memorandum which responds
to the Committes'"s request for the table of contents of
the FBI Hanuat of Instructions and the FBI Manual of Rules “\
and Reeulations and those portions of these Manuals which
pertain to internal security, intelligente collection,
and/or countorintelligence matters, operations, or activities,
A copy of this memorandum is enclosed for your records,

Processing of the additional requests is continuing
on an expeditidus basis and further responses will be
for theoning.,

REG- 106 7 «~ @ wn OF
Enclosures ~ 13 Gh oo / l. FA) F5 :
an x cman
Miejvi.( ‘| w i. TF APR 28 1975 7
(7) nN » at t, ( a — ™ Semen mrcmmancd/ fag :
4 . pe Mae ts vat apy at ‘G on “). ne
4 a dn on oa Loe a Saye: On pol -
a _<t Fe SC ee pp eles bor _ , a
Of pase * a ae
gud , wy
pn BESINY “i pe Se
i Cyap (un
aa
{! ; ae '
SECRET MATERIAL ATTACHED ._ | a |
co ora

’

te.
Me

rector Sec! ROOM(__] TELETYPE uNiIT J] , Stake GPO 934-535 |
Hinds RoBdasa0628 Page 128 bre, ;


> oe q
we v* ©
~ 2 =~ Legai Counsel Division

(i-lir, Farrington)
oie i- Mr. We Re. Wannall

Os He 1- Mr, We 0, Cregar

fpPil @, 3075

ale UNITED STATES SENATE SELMCT ConETTED
TG STUDY GOVERNMENTAL GPDORATIONS WITH
RESBECT GO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Reference is made to leticy dated March 20, 1975,
to the Attorney General from the Chairrian of captioned
Committee, which enclosed certain requests Zor documents
and abheg Antorms ison fvon the Federal Buranu of Investiga~

on Cepd e

Under ZV. A. (Policies and Procedures} the table
of contents of the FEI Manual of Instructions and certain
portions of this Manual were requested, In accordance with
this request the followine matorial is onelasod:

3} Table of contents; 2) Preface, Guidelines for
PSE Investigations; 3) Section 26, Espionage (classified
"Seeret"}>; 4) Seetion 84. Heristration Aet; 5) Section $6,
Sabotage; 6) Section 87. Investigations of Subversive
Organizations and Individuals; 7) Seetion 85, Sedition;
8) Section 95, Treason; 9} Section 67, Yoorhie Act;
30} Seetion 122, Estromist Motters aad Civil Unrest.

Net included #8 enclosures are Section 105,
Internal Security « Nationalistie Tandency (Forcighn Intelli-
ponce), clnssified "Sceret"; Sectien 107, Part 2, Internal
Soeurity Informants and Confidentini Sources; Section 107,
Part I2, Foreiom Countorintelligence Assets; or Section 126,
Extrenist Inforpants and Sources, These Ecefions ave deonod
J to contain oxtremoly sensitive informtion and for that
nw youson are not being transmitted; howover, they are available
for veview by appropriately cleared perSoennel of the
committee stavZi at EBX Headquarters,

Assoc. Dir,
Dep. AD Adm. —
Dep. AD Inv.

Asst. Dirss Under IV. DB, the tabie of contents of the FBI
Admin. _____ Finpunk of Rules and Reguiations and pertinent portions of

est this Banuak wore requested, there is enclosed a copy of the
Filee&com  t8Bie oF contents of the FRE Manual of Eudes and fepulations,
Gen. Inv. .

Ident.

__ Inspection LIA vy,
trol ——" EVL: jvL A Pur : wa
owe TY SECRET UATENIAL ATTACHED ‘s _

.! 4g
SEE NOTE PAGE TWO \.. |

CLOSURE, / ‘, . a > 5 GPO 654-545

Spec. Inv.

Training

Legal Coun. _
Telephone Rm. __ ' Y
Director Soc'y... MAIL ROOME_] ‘TELETYPE UNITES.)
NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 129


* UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COUNTTTER
OW INTULLIGENGE ACTEVITILS

Prom a rovlew of the table of contents of this Hanual it can
be secon that tho material containcd in this Manual pertains
to sdmuinistrative rather than investigative operationa of
the FRI, and for that reason it has not been possible to
acleat portions of this Manual which portain dircctiy to
internal Sceurity, intolligonce colicction, und/or counters
inteliipenne matters, operations, ox activitics rosponsive
to the Committes's request, The various other requests
contained in the Committee letter of March 19, 1975, are
veoolving attention and further responce will be forthooning
nt the earliest ponsibie tine,

Enctosures = Li

1 - The Attorney General

NOTE:

Table of contents for Manual of Instructions and
Manual of Rules and Regulations, as well-as the several Sections
| of the Manual of Instructions which are being transmitted to
the Select Committee, have already been made available to the
General Accounting Office in the past, with the exception of
Section 36, Section 105, and Section 107, Part If, Sections
105, 107, Part I and Part II,ami Section 130 are not being
furnished to the Committee, but the Committee will be allowed .
to oxamine these Sections at FBIHQ, Section 36, dealing with
espionage, although classified, does not contain sensitive
material involving sources and we feel in the spirit of the
requirement we should furnish this Section to the Committee,

As a matter of interest, all of the material with
respect to the Manual of Instructions which has been made
available to GAO is actually maintained in FBI space,

> NW 88296 Docid:32989626 Page 130

bh |

,
April 1%, 1975 gi
r - ype bv g .
This isf ©o acknowledge receipt of
classified ma ial by letterhead memorandum
dated April 48,1975, from the Federal Bureau
of Investigation.

Pp for Senate lect *
Committee on oo
Intelligence Activities.

yd ME SIS ~ BE pas
ENCLOSURE

_ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 131 _

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 - 5010-106
MAY 1962 EDITION

UNITED STATES G , ae @ Assets Dt ora
ep. D-Adii.
- Deb
\) Memorandum aye
. \ ‘ z Comp. Syst.
a Ext. Affairs
“ve : Mr. J. B. Adams DATE: 4-8-75 er Fils & Com —
t wy . ran. Inv.
Ve % gate Ident.
From : Legal Counsel, ...« ‘Ore OE WK rae
SUBJECT:\. SENSTUDY 75. ms 2 sfoc! fav.
4 BRIEFING Ft STAFF MEMBERS oie am
. “BY INTELLIGENCE DIVISION Director Sec'y —

‘APRIL 11, °1975°-—~

As you were previously advised, William Miller, Staff Director
of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities, requested that we
provide a briefing for certain staff members of the Committee on the functions
of the Intelligence Division. He asked that the briefing cover both internal
security and foreign counterintelligence operations and that it provide a broad
overview of our investigative responsibilities.

, 58 4 ahi » The Intelligence Division is prepared to offer a two-hour briefing
iar beginning at 10:00 a.m. on Friday, 4-11-75. It will include a slide show to
be followed by a general discussion and an opportunity to afford questions. and .
answers. After a luncheon break, the staff members will be given a brief tour ~}
of the Files and Communications Division. ce
Since the briefing will cover classified materials, no staff
members will be invited unless they have appropriate security clearances. As
a consequence Professor John Elliff, who has been tentatively named Director
of the Committee's Task Force on Domestic Intelligence, will not attend. It
is hoped that we may provide him with a private mveliche at ny later date, 9 7
2? f fine 7 iy
It is expected that those attending the briefing Will bho a
Mr. Miller, F. A. O. Schwarz Il, Chief Counsel, Mark Gitenstein and
Marvin Epstein, staff members. Since no Committee members will bé present,
we are not recommending that the staff meet with the Directove™== A

RECOMMENDATION: _ EB apr 23.1975. ©
* eet] sccasiicir
That the above-named staff members of the Senate Select Committee
be given a briefing by the Intelligence Division and the Files and Communications

Division on 4-11-75. GZ,
yp Paw eur
1 - Mr. Callahan AYN - Mr. Mintz
1 -Mr. Adams J 1 -Mr. Cregar
1 -Mr. Jenkins a A} 1~4Mr. Farrington
a5 sa Wannall ‘s “ 1 -Mr. Hotis ve

a ct ie
aa Prag )
Fee #8 Page 132


‘
OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 5010-106 a
MAY 1962 EDITION
“GSA GUEMREGT NO. 27 ;
S Assoc. Dir.

\ | * UNITED STATE ERNMENT Dee, ARNE

' Memorandum ri ll

Coftp. Syst. —_
Ext. Affairs

TO : Mr. J. B. Adams Gon ee
®. wot Irepectton
. if a ¢ rs Intell. a
FROM : Legal Counsdi ig, FIFO “Asbegd =
CP mrennns Boose ae
SUBJECT. SENSTUDY —_ pase lB ane
mime os otto s cwee Telephone Rm. —
The Washington Post,’ Thursday, 4-10-75, edition Director Seely —

on page A31 contains an article reporting an interview of Senator Frank

Church, Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities.
Senator Church, according to this article, stated that the Committee is

reserving the right to make public eventually any documents it gets and is } yf
accepting nothing with "strings attached.” CA

Inasmuch as this Committee is also the Committee which the
FBI is furnishing information tok, it is believed a clarification of Senator Church's
statement must be obtained and in the interim we should furnish the Senate
Select Committee only those documents which do not have a caveat such as
classified documents or documents bearing the property stamp.

Section Chief William O. Cregar advised that he had contacted
Dr. John M. Clarke, Associate Deputy to the DCI for the Intelligence Committee
concerning Senator Church's reported statement. Clarke stated that CIA
Director William E. Colby was highly upset at Church's remark and that
this statement would be a topic of a discussion of the Executive Committee meeting
of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group on Congressional Review the morning of
4-11-75. We will be represented at that conference by Section Chief William O.
Cregar and Assistant Director John A. Mintz. Clarke indicated the position |
that the CIA will apparently take regarding this problem is that the White House
should obtain the clarification although CIA Director Colby initially was prepared
to send a letter over his signature to Senator Church to obtain such clarification. LB

AS Acer = Cell 2 -
ee Inasmuch as the request EX on vee was forwarded throu
the Department, Senator Church's statement was brought to the attention of

Douglas Marvin, Assistant to the Attorney General, who has been handling

all FBI responses to Senate Select Committee requests. Marvin indrestedke™ ="

was concerned at Church's statement and stated it was the Attorney General's

desire that he be advised of ahy Bureau response to the Committee EGacOFRihg 1975
this matter. my 4 cece EA EE
Enc. ‘ ae a
1 - Mr. Adams 1 - Mr. Farrington . \\ “4
1 ~ Mr. Wannall 1 - Mr. Hotis
1 See f 4 Kane 1 - °
: 4 ARAB ROA ONZBar Mr. Daly RECOMMENDATION
sees CONTINUED - OVER
PVD:dkg (9)

NW 88296 Docid!37889628 Page 133


Legal Counsel to Adams Memo
RE: SENSTUDY 75

RECOMMENDATION:

? No action be taken by the Bureau to obtain clarification

‘of Senator Church's statement pending the results, 4-11-75, meeting of

the Executive Committee of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group on Congressional
Review, and that in the interim we furnish the Senate Select Committee only
those documents which do not have a caveat such as classified documents

or documents bearing the property stamp.

py? Wh ford

NW88296 Docid:32989620 Page 134


8 C

Senate CIA Conimittee Says
White House Stalls on Data

By George Lardner Jr. Church said,he did not|jected round of public hear-}
‘Washington Post Staff Writer know “what the hang-up is”/ings this summer. The Housel
The Senate Committee on|Since White House aides have|has also ordered a similar in-
Intelligence Operations dis-|indicated they consider thejquiry but its committee,
closed yesterday that the|Committee’s entire request as/headed by Rep. Lucien Nedzi
White House is still stalling| “perfectly proper.” (D-Mich.), has yet to choose a
on, a month-old request for! ‘Church did not spell out all|staff director.
the directives involving covert] of “the more sénsitive data”| The Senate committee’s
activities by the Central In-|that is still being withheld,| chief counsel, Fritz Schwarz
telligence Agency and other|/but he said it includes both] said directors have now been
arms of the Government. the Colby report and ‘the top-|named for ali four of its task
> Sen, Frank Church (p-|Secret White House and Na-|forces, They are ‘William
Tdaho), the committee chair-|tional Security Council direc-| Bader, head of the foreign in-
man, told reporters after al tives dealing with covert oper-| telligence task force;. John El-
closed, 24-hour meeting that|ations, Roth foreign and do-|litt, head of the domestic in
‘he had been authorized to|™estic. . ‘| telligence task force; Alton H.
write another letter to Pres-| The Idaho senator said the|Quanbeck, head of the Mili-
fdent Ford asking him to ex-|COmmittee is reserving theltary intelligence task force,
pedite the request. right to make public eventu-|and David Aaron, head of the
The committee asked Mr. ally any documents it gets and task force that will study the
Ford on March. 12 for all the|!$, 2ccePting not. hing with}intelligence community's
executive orders and top- strings attached.” But he de| ‘command and control struc-
secret National Security Coun-| (ined to speculate on whether ture.”
‘ @il directives concerning the {his might pe fe reason for Bader is ia former Senate.
GIA and the rest of the in-| 70,20 mmsiration s “eshance- |Foreign Relations Committee
i a Church said all of the rec-|,.
telligence community, includ-|o.qy were essential to the aide and has recently been
‘ {ng the command structure at ittee’s mandate to i working with the Ford Foun-
the White House. © 8"! committee’s mandate to inves. ; odoi
. tigate the CIA and the rest of
The President was alsolthe government’s intelligence
asked to supply the committee] community. He said he still
' with a copy of CIA Director] had.no reason to think at this
' William E. Colby’s January] point that the White House
report to ar. pord on allege: would refuse to give them up,
ons of illegal domestic spy-| but he emphasized that he saw : q
ing by the agency. no reason for further delay. on ane toe tional Security
But all the committee has; Church.said the committee “. .
gotten so far, Church said,|also authorized its staff of| Schwarz said that each of}
has been what the White] about 35 lawyers and investi-| the task forces will cut across|
House evidently regards as|gators to start gathering evi-/the lines of various intelli-|
the least sensitive documents|dence and interviewing wit-| sence agencies and focus on}

on | om es 48 relude to a pro-|general avenues of inquiry,
on the list. =o. nesses as the Py P |such as the “legal authority|

pert in domestic law enforce-
ment activities. Quanbeck has
been director of the Brookings
Institution’s defense analysis}

nel ~~ and legal restrain ” for intel-
. ‘|ligence work; the targets and/’
ALT THPORMATTON COLTWALIRED ‘techniques of  intelligence-|.

7 aTteT™ gathering, counterintelligence]’

HEREIN, TS BOLASS 2S » em er and covert operations, and the|
BATE) Br question of who orders and
controls those activities.

Pal *

"The Washington Post"
April 10, 1975

» , gas. fF)
G2 (PB 75 °-

NW 66296 Dochd:32989628 Page 135


NW 88296.

° v y ‘o

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 5010-106
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN. REG. NO, 27

WNITHO STATES GOVERNMENT — ‘vn
- ; sath, De of nv
J Memorandum yp “igi - wr. cattanan oi
Ae ye 1 - Mr. Adams Anil —
> Ext. Affairs _
re :Mr. W. R. Wannall io DATE: 4/7/75 files & Com, __
.# y en. Inv,
I ‘4 PS Ident.
: J * 1 — Mr. Bassett Inspectign
FROM W100 Gregar SH 1 =~ Mr. Mintz in
“y Sas 1 - Mr. Walsh VieghieautL 2
erent a / 1 - Mr. Wannall Pick ta Evel. —
SUBJECT: ‘SENSTUDY 75 1 - Mr. Hotis Spee, tov
trainin
sre teeeeneengenrenanns 7 wg 1 - Mr ° Cregar Telephone Rm.

Director Sec’y __

muse, nenorandon reports the results of a meeting are

of the’ ecutive Committee of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group ae

on’ Congressional Review, of vthe Intelligence Community (here~

after referred to_as.thé*EXCOM), held at CIA Headquarters on

the morning of 4/4/75, /° - a a
This meeting was chaired by Mr. Colby in his role asi!

the Director of Central Intelligence. In attendance were

Mr. Roderick Hills, Assistant Counsel to the President; Associate

Deputy AG Wilderotter; Mr. John Clarke; as well as senior officiais

from Defense, Treasury, National Security Council, Office of :
Management and Budget, and the Energy Research and Development. Ps
Administration, ay

The following items of interest were discussed:

Mr. Roderick Hills reported that he had a meeting
with the Counsel and Staff Director of the Senate Select Com
mittee (SSC) to discuss having Legal Counsel present when members
of a particular agency were being interviewed by SSC staff person-
nel, The essence of this meeting resulted in the SSC being
receptive to such an arrangement but it would be incumbent upon
each agency, department or bureau to negotiate the specific
arrangements for such representation with the SSC. Hills also
discussed the probtem of the unknown employee or former employee
who might request to be interviewed unbeknownst to the parent
agency. It was suggested to the Counsel and Staff Director by
Hills that such an employee be interviewed by only one staff
member, that the staff member attempt to termin the wwe tS
this individual's testimony and then paces’: éSti we wa ti oP
the parent agency to insure the then REGes d provide. advica:
to the sensitivity of the unknown employee's, testimony. ..No firm
decisions were made but it would appear the Counse Se
Director will agree to allow Counsel to be present

4 a Dery
Enclosures Sl Jo. ee
woc: zebe , oo
(9) Me _ CONTINUED ~ OVER ,
a . 2

# ; re
eunisitBhing 2.187% aM

pcld:32989628 Page 136


NW 882796 Dochd:32989628 Page 117

Memorandum for Mr. Wannall
RE: SENSTUDY 75

testimony of a secret employee and following such testimony
the employee will be allowed to meet with staff members of
the SSC in an Executive Session. It is anticipated more
definitive information on the final decisions regarding this
aspect will be forthcoming from the White House,

The question was raised by the Bureau representative
as to whether the Ad Hoe Group and/or the interagency registry
should be notified as to requests members of the Intelligence
Community receive from other Congressional committees. Mr.
Wilderotter advised that this would be a judgment question;
however, if a request from a Congressional committee other than
the Select Committees impacted on the Intelligence Community,
involve sensitive issues or would be of interest to the White
House, such requests should be provided to the interagency
registry along with an abstract of the response.

Attached is a list of those members of the SSC staff
who have been certified for access to compartmented information,
Also attached is a paper identifying 10 issues likely to grow
out of Select Committee deliberations. The pencil notation in
the right-hand column identifies those agencies of the Intelli-
gence Community responsible for preparing a paper which addresses
these issues. It is noted that issue identified as number eight
is entitled, "Intelligence Files and Privacy." Mr. Colby asked
that the FBI prepare this paper. Assistant Director Mintz advised
that the Bureau has a study underway on this very subject and
agreed that the Bureau would prepare this study. The deadline
for completion of the study is 4/25/75.

Also attached is a copy of the survey of the SSC facility,
Room G-308, Dirksen Building, covering all aspects of physical and
technical security. None of the participants of the EXCOM had any
objection to the facility and we presume the SSC will abide by
the procedures outlined in the attached survey report.

wv

Attached also for information is a draft of an employee ‘
notice and agreement concerning treatment of confidential material
being considered by the SSC. It is to be noted that to date neither
the Committeerr its staff has signed any such Secrecy Agreement.

CONTINUED - OVER


Memorandum for Mr. Wannall
RE: SENSTUDY 75

ACTION:

For information and record purposes.

“Jo .
a (eal we

NW 88796 -Docld:32989628 Page 138


on = a a ao ene iia rete oe wee ee ee eee
hos . q of
yu . 4
‘ ‘eo . ’ 3
’ r * .

. AGREEMENT

TI have read the foregoing employee notice
concerning treatment of confidential material and
have read the Resolution establishing the Senate
Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations
_ With Respect to Intelligence Activities, and the
Committee Rules. .
rT understand that to qualify as an employee of
the Select Comittee, I am required to, and I hereby .
agree to, abide by those Rules. I.further understand |
. a and agree that the obligations hereby placed
vpon me continue ‘after my employment with the Committee

has terminated. . tN

4

SIGRATURE

SWORN TO BEFORE NOTARY

i
i) s
4 oe

W 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 139 __.

“+

>

those staff members with appropriate security clearances
and a wemkeresa need to know.

"7.5 -Testimony taken in Executive session or papers
and other materials received by the staff shall not be
made public or disclosed to any person outside the —
Committee unless authorized by a majority vote of the
Committee, or upon termination of the Committee, as
determined by a vote of the ‘Senate.

- "76° Before the Committee is called upon to make any
disposition with respect to the testimony, papers, or other at
materials presented to it, the Committee members shall have’

a reasonable opportunity to examine all pertinent testimony,
papers, and other materials that have been obtained by the
inquiry staff. No member shall release any of that testi-

. mony or those papers or other materials to the public or .
any person outside the Committee unless authorized by a
majority vote, a quorum being present at the time the vote

is taken.

"9.30 “The staff of the Committée shall not discuss
either the substance or procedure of the work of the.
Committee with anyone other than a member of the Committee . .
or other Committee ‘personnel. Upon termination of employ- >
‘ment. by the Committee, each member of the staff, or con- ’
sultant, shall surrender any classified material which
. came into his possession while in the employ of the Committee... -

; tg,4 The employment of any member of the staff who
fails to conform to these Rules shall be immediately terminated.” .

“In addition to the strict security precautions adopted.
by the. Committee there are, as you no doubt know, sections of
the United States Code and Executive Orders which relate to
keeping certain material confidential-—they are sections Cro pe-

eeez aed which are annexed hereto. 4

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 ‘Page 140"


'

Pursuant to the Resolution, the Committee Rules include

provisions relating to the confidential treatment of material

received by the Committee. These provisions are contained in

Rules 6.11; 7 ‘(and éach of its subsections), 9. 3 and 9.4 which
provide the following:

n6, 11 -Release of Testimony and Other Matters. . No
‘testimony taken or material presented at an Executive
Session shall be made public, in wholé or in part or by
way or summary, unless authorized by a majority vote of
the Committee. Unless authorized by the Chairman the
name of any witness scheduled to be heard by the Committee
shall not be released prior to his testimony.

"RULE 7. Procedures for Handling Select Committee
Classified or Sensitive Material

"7,1 Staff offices on the first floor of the Dirksen
' Office Building shall.operate under’ strict security .
precautions. One guard shall be on duty at all times by
the entrance to control entry. All persons, before entering
the offices shall identify themselves. An additional guard
shall be posted at night for surveillance of the secure
‘area where sensitive documents are kept.

.™7.2 Sensitive documents and other materials shall
be segregated in a secure storage area. They may be
examined only at secure reading facilities. Copying or
duplicating of such documents and other materials is pro-
hibited except as is necessary for use in Committee ;
meetings or to prepare for the taking of testimony: or -for
interviews. .

"73 Each member of the Committee shall at all times
have access to all papers and things received from any
source by subpoena or otherwise. The staff director —
shall be responsible for the maintenance,.under appropriate
security procedures, of a record. of all papers and things
in the possession of the Committee, which log shall be
available to any member of the Committee.

"7.4 Access to classified information supplied to

the Committee shall be limited by the staff director, the
chief counsel and the counsel to the minority, and to

rn

Ak gh

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 141

4


. SENATE "SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS

Employee Notice and Agreement ‘Concerning Treatment of
Confidential Material

Concern about security and the maintenance of confidenti-
ality of information provided the Senate Select Committee has

been stressed Since the outset by the Senate and the Committee.’

Dpaer > / 2 9£

serena namtinecnmuacirmtneenrom atten ee

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

NOTICE

Section 7 of the resolution which established the

‘Committee requires the Committee tot

NW 68296 Docid:32989626 Page 142

disclosure, outside the Select Committee of any

"institute’ and earr y out such rules and pro-_

‘cedures as it “may deem necessary to prevent the

information relating to the activities of the

Central Intelligence Agency or any other depart—

“ment or agency of the Federal Government engaged “

in intelligence activities, obtained by the.
Select Committee during the course of its study
and investigation, not authorized by the Select
Committee to be disclosed; and (2) the disclosure,
outside the Select Committee, of any information
which would adversely affect the intelligence.
activities of the Central Intelligence Agency in
foreign countries or the intelligence activities
in foreign countries of any department or agency

of the Federal Government.”


4

1
&
ae

a }

CO | Bo) 75-1509

. 1 APR PS
MEMORANDUM FOR: Associate Deputy to the DCI
for the Intelligence Community '
VIA , : Deputy Director for Administrati 2 APR wys
SUBJECT : Security Survey, Senate Select Gommittee

Facility, Room G-308, Dirksen Building,
Capitol Hill

: 1. Attached to this memorandum is a letter to
Mr. William G. Miller for your Signature.

2. A security survey of the Senate Select Comnittee
facility, Room G-308, Dirkser Building, as requested by
Mr. Ben Marshall, Security Director of that Committee,
was completed on 24 March 1975.

3. With the security procedures now in effect and —
those planned for-implementation, the facility will provide
adequate protection for the handling and storage of CIA

.documents of all levels of classification. Also attached
for your information is a copy of the survey report.

ava a W. “eae
Director of Security

Att: an
4 cc: DD/A Rofl
” Chairman, SECOM wie

oS 5 1284
Rewraded Unclassified when separated

from Classified Attachment(s) SeGrEy E-2 YMPDET
NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 143 vow ‘ CL BY\063417


yates Bee

ae 7 - r . — a Oo

* SURVEY REPORT

Senate Select Committee Facility
Dirksen Bldg. Ist & C Street, N. E.
Washington, D. C.

“1. In: response ‘to. a request from Mr.. Ben. Marshall, Security |
Director, Senate Select Committee, (tele. 224-1700). Messrs. my
Nicholas R. Zubon and Robert E. Burgener conducted a comprehensive
security. survey of the Senate. Select Committee: Ss Facility on
.24 March A975. .

2.. Mr. Marshall provided both - a comprehetisive ‘tour of the
facility and a detailed explanation of the operation, -

Be The following are pertinent facts ‘concerning the ‘security.
procedures as related to the Senate Select Committee Facility:

A.: Type of Facility |

The Committee is in the ‘auditorium (Room G. 308) of the Dirksen
: Building at ist and C Streets, N. E., Washington, D. C. . Access to
the auditorium is gained easiest by entering the building from the
/ 1st and C Streets entrance. A 24-hour guard post is located just
‘inside this entrance.. The Select Committee facility is. 40’ east:
o£ the building guard post.: It is nearly in direct line of sight,.
“however, a foyer surrounded by a 6! high temporary partition pre-
cludes the auditorium entrance door from being visible. . The
entrance to the auditorium is protected by a 24- hour. guard post.

The auditoriui (Room G 308) is approximately. 100’. long x 45!

wide. The floor,. ceiling and walls are made of 6" to 8" solid
"masonry. The ceiling has. a false ceiling approximately 18" deep

in which ‘the air handling equipment ‘and sundry’ other service’ ©. = -
‘components are housed. . All major air handling equipment is on

the roof above the auditorium. Access to the roof which ‘is strictly —
controlled by the Director of Security, is gained by a stairway

in the ‘southeast ‘corner of the auditorium. The. sidewalls: each have

.a 2' x 3" register approximately 12'. above the floor through which ©

mms ae - to yt an

y ' a
eh dunin d J

NW 88296 Docld:52989628 Page 144


air is passed from the auditorium to the air handling equip-
ment on the roof. These registers are solidly bolted into
the walls. ot

The front of the auditorium (south wall) is covered by
a large movie screen. To the right and left of the movie
-. screen are two rooms 6' wide and approximately 15" long used.
by the.research section clerical personnel. These rooms" - ~~: ..>
have countertop openings approximately 3" above the floor
for access from within the auditorium. Countertop openings ~
exist along both sidewalls for approximately three quarters.:
of the length of the wail. The sidewalls have intercorridors
on the opposite ‘side of the countertops which have been con-
verted into. unpartitioned office space.- The only reproduction
machine, a xerox model. 3100, is located.in the west corridor.
The east corridor has been converted into a compartmented
information storage room and a compartmented document reading |
room. The Security Director indicated that he may move his~
office to the head of the compartmented reading room to provide ©
a larger measure of access ‘control -to this sensitive area. 2
The ‘auditorium has six wooden exterior doors, 7 high ‘and
. 3" thick. The entrance door into the auditorium (west and
north wall) will have an.electrical push-button lock installed.
A similar door in the east end of the north wall will be barred:
and bracketed’on the inside to prevent unauthorized entry. . The -.
west wall has 2 exterior doors leading into the Capitol Police —
offices. The east wall has two exterior doors with one leading ~
to the roof while the second door exits into the Capitol Police
Garage. All exterior doors will be alarmed. The doors now |.
have Yale 197 °:1/4 locks with the keys controlled by Mr..Marshall.
The fire safety factor concerning these docked doors” was dis~
cussed with hin. , . _ Dog a

The auditorium has a small second floor area at the “north *
end. - Access is gained by two stairways on the east and west
side of the auditorium. The second floor space consists of a
large projection room, currently filled with projection equip-
ment, and five ‘small. private film viewing rooms. _—

The five small rooms will be ‘converted into witness ‘inter-

view rooms. The windows in each of these rooms will be covered
during the stay of the Select Committee in the auditorium.

NW.88296 Docld:32989678 Page 450 dE OL


—

_ are processed: through ° x-ray machines. Vendors entering the ~

. checked. . . . . ; ot _?

‘door. His instructions are that all persons entering must:

the Senate Select Committee has one 24-hour/7 day-a-week guard
‘the auditorium. All police officers are well trained, wear

revolvers. . After-~hour patrols. check all doors, the entire °
_guards on duty at the time of the ‘survey were ‘alert ‘and

- posts during each shift. In addition the guard at the °

to these posts.

NW 88296" Docld:32989628 Page 146. °

” B. Access Controls

Access ‘to the Dirksen Building is gained by either the
main entrance on ist and C Streets, ground level, or the
Basement Tunnel Entrance at the rear of the building. Both
entrances have a 24-hour guard post where persons entering
are checked for identification. Brie= cases and packages

main entrance are checked for ID, however’, all boxes. ‘are not

‘Entry into the auditorium is “controlled by a guard at ‘the |

show ‘an ID card. | Visitors are permitted only by: appointment ..
They are ‘logged in. and escorted at all times while in the
auditorium. From 1800. houys Friday through 0800 hours Saturday,
and from 1300 hours Saturday to 0700. hours Monday. everyone must’:
Sign the log in and out and show an ID. In the event an access
problem arises at the guard post, regardless of the hour, Mr.
Marshail.is alerted. s Lo.

C. ° Guards
‘The Dirksen Building and the auditorium are protected by
members of the U. S. Capitol Police Department. The Building |
has two 24-hour/7day-a-week ‘guard posts at the entrances while ”

post at the entrance and an after-hours roving patrol inside.
the Capitol Police uniform and carry Smith “and Wesson 38 caliber ~

auditorium ‘for classified material that may not have been
secured, and the second floor hourly during the night. The

responsive to. their duties. During off-duty hours, guard
supervisors make at least two unscheduled visits. to the ‘guard

stationary post has. four telephones, two of which have a pickup
and automatic ring feature with Capitol Police Headquarters.
There will be no rotation of police officers during the °
occupancy of the Committee. The same officers will be assigned


D. : Alarms :

All exterior doors to the auditorium will have contact
(microswitch) alarms. The Remington Rand safes, being ,
obsolete, will be protected by a proximity alarm.. The ~

. compartmented storage room and an adjacent reading area -
will be protected by a volumetric alarm. . For fire pro- °
tection a smoke detector/rate of rise ‘alarm will be ;
installed in the compartmented area. All alarms will °
enunciate at the guard desk at the entrance to the |

auditorium. . The ADT Company will install and maintain | ~
the alarms. SL . 7 ' . :

EB. Safes a

..The facility. has 22 ‘safes. . Sixteen 4- drawer Remington. ;
Rand Safes located below ‘the movie screen. Three ‘Class: ‘six.
Mosier 5-drawer, two class 1 Diebold 2-drawer, and one class -

-2 Diebold four-drawer are located in the compartmented storage —
‘room. With the exception of the Remington Rand sates, a ald
; other: safes are in good working ‘order. |

The safe combination and repairs are under contract with”
the Safemaster Company. The safe combinations were recently -.
changed by that company... A1L safe combinations are under the —

. control of Mr. Marshall. ‘However, an assist on day-to-day .
operations is provided by Mr. Pat Shea, Assistant Staff a
Director, who acts as backup for ‘safeguarding the combinations -
to the safes in the compartmented storage room. Messrs. Larry |
Kieves, John Petersen and Ms. Jan Orloff are backup for the’ |

combinations to the sixteen Remington Rand Safes. Mr. Marshall
was given two. change keys in the event he decides to change the |

. combination. himself should stait personnel rotate, :

F, Documen't Control

Incoming CIA documents will be delivered by: Agency ¢ courier ‘
to the guard at the entrance door to the auditorium. The
registry officer will receipt for them and take them to the’
Registry Section where all documents will be logged. Com-

. partmented and Top Secret material will be taken to thé Com---
partmented Storage Room and placed in a safe after it has ~
been logged in Registry. Individuals, on an access list
promuigated by Mr. Marshall draw the compartmented documents -
from the safes but must read them in the adjacent area dedicated
for this purpose. Documents classified below TS/Codeword will
4 . —, _ . . MAIS “ o's 7 we - ' . L - se

URS a

piv 88296 Docl:32989628 Page 47 er


. 27 eye ° . - , " . . 6 .
+ « - . 4 . : mae “a 9 .

*, eh : . QRne - P

“,” ° . . ‘s . . : .

ro
Raa one

Teme a gt meneame emutestaniny ane Meet we a te wares see ee eof weet wee ms

be stored in the Remington Rand safes. |The. documents iin the
Remington Rand safes can be drawn by anyone on the staff, but
must be veceipted for with the Registry. Officer. The ‘documents’
are to be read ou the tables placed there for that purpose in’
the. Research Section. ‘

Further control of classified documents ‘is directed through °

... the assigning of a staff employee given responsibility for the - Lot
- reproduction of documents. on the xerox machine. He will.con- °° = > ©

. trol the number of copies nade on typewriters . ;

‘All. classified material is secured in. Safes” at the end of
the working day.

He Classified Waste.

‘It is estimated that cone 50-pound bag of classified waste °

. Will be generated each week while the Committee is in session.
Once the bag is filled with classified waste, it will be™
‘placed in the locked trunk of Mr. Marshall's automobile and
taken to the Federal Reserve Building incinerator where he
will witness destruction by. burning. In the event this incin-

. erator is booked to capacity, he will take ‘the classified waste ©
and burn it at the D. C. incinerator. Should either incin- -:
erator become unavailable to the Committee, Mr. Marshall was _
assured that CIA would consider assisting hin. in the secure ¢
disposition of Committee classified waste.

“Te Comparthiented/TS Storage °
_A room dedicated as the ‘codeword/TS storage ‘room iS in
the northeast. ‘corner of the auditorium. Its five walls are’
solid masonry ranging. from 6" to’ 8" thick. . A 1/8" stainless -
steel door frame is boited to the masonry walls. A pre~
_ fabricated 9 gage wire cross-patch metal frame door is attached
to the steel frame serving as access control to the dedicated
room. The door will be secured by. lock ‘and key once classified
‘material arrives for storage. This room will be alarmed,

J. Telephone *

_ The Facility has six standard telephones in the auditorium,
Five of the telephones will be equipped with conversation

_NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 143


masking devices. A central switch ‘installed ahead of the .
telephone instruments. will disconnect all teléphones ©
simultaneously, should: the need arise. The telephone system _
is maintained by the local telephone company .

Security Briefings -

All new members of the committee receive a thorough ”
briefing from Mr. Marshall on security procedures ard ~
security responsibilities. Briefings are Periodically

reinforced when conditions warrant.. .

L. ° Security Duty. Check Procedures :* _ Ser
Custodians secure the safe cabinets assigned to them,
i.e. Mr. Shea, codeword room, Messrs. Kieves, Petersen,
and Ms. Orloff, Research ‘area. Mr. Marshall double checks »
behind them, ' The custodian, Security Director and the
roving guard patrol chéck the ‘entire auditorium to. ensure a
all classified material has been secured at the end of the a
day. ; cn tet tat,

M. ot _ . . ae . “ - on a .

Mr. Marshall has taken: action on this requirément and

- continues to monitor this area to provide the Committee .
with as much ‘security protection against the Audis threat -
as possible... . a potent

N. Shredder

The facility has ore Destroyit Model’ 51 Shredder used .*
oniy for shredding-the most sensitive documents. Other  .
documents are not shredded in this machine because of its °
limited shredding capability. wy

- O° General Observations a oe ae

The security procedures implemented within the Senate.
Select Committee facility are sufficient to provide a proper
environment for the protection of classified materials. The -
survey officers were pleased with the security director's -. Lo,
dedication to the objective of providing the best Security
possible ‘for the Committee.

wien EE wot, _ : _— Toe

Net 4 . - - Oo. ra - _ a

Goa eet A, shoe ca ote , - -
- ‘ . a

|_NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Paget49 0s Be ba ws


OO  payaay to Te prety peda pyrene

rect

vew 4, ° | “Ty :
phan ovpeaden! 1 Hl wot

wo’ niece Ger £7
Ye . eet 7 frinee wes cremtennete reo rntrnictmanttnaratcarencenttonnnashintre lt £r:banteavertuiriats unsleinintenpeneshewn : ‘.
2

ett

Spa ze

Pe ineea idan ane

rR rYerremnhs £78 8 YRLAN temeneetne ee nie gh,

(EA ay PT eA re p

tp paw -

bibieialidiadiniiathitntens donciractesereoe ee

i

Cite Recopfent #9:
aprteensisre

A brch

fe “et

7]

FH Li

a
2
i
ry *
zy x
aN v
_ Be Ps
Se fa
. wos We
Rep ot SS hs
~ . Cea faa a) - Trerrerrcrrmnncmmreneranemmmteeee r LE NaN ‘=
a ee " 7 p “ty 8 ys
. ‘ vA a : fi? 2a Burro ne ite Phe, aoe 5A 3 “=
vf | — aa hd tte : i: pepwanyilidlavo.s Saal ~ x .
. Pepersw Loud yes Pay sy Ppaat ob NO.
“ aN — aby ge
. \ ~ ig a . e o .
att Sg : eeyged youd yp dea
wet aig xe - OBE ALS o
. a & x . . , . a -, . . .
ety my 2S ee
ea ~ Qo.
“Ns \s $ _ “k us

—— Ms
Pete ee ete tat anes need

ete fase,

“a

Sb

£ 4feto rfogttim

»

Pasir a4

sy f8L Nr.

ad
‘“—

oa

aa

HA tH

fete

7AM

dy
Fad
NW 88256 Docld:32989628 Page 150

Le


3 ° ,
~ n : , . * ‘ ‘
' ' . io ‘ . ,
a a ”
; .
. : r ~ CVBINIRINTE |
. : ee
whe omy
7 . MAINGalar |
; cu a [Tstnnoe ct 0304 emeeabete stata ss tenioetens ncnowtte
fg "
wy “2
S ~
~, ou
NI
at .
: f
a
~Y - Wea el
— ;
< 7 (PAIABIY 27.
ie pene rennet
NU °
r Ww oy ;
\r Mas APaLMT .

sn

“Ml 9 ef

Sore

i

et ns en ta seen ee RMR OS en em Teen

‘NW.88296 Docld:32989628. Page 151

PART ce ™


In previous” sessions we discussed the importance of. —— od
whi ghlighting: assuds” likely to @row' out-of - Commission: ‘er: UA se. add
‘Committee deliberations. We observed that we should identify :
‘some of those on which a legal brief or annex would be helpful
-to Executive Branch initiatives. The idea was to select,a .
.few where a solid research paper with options, pros and cons,
“ete., could help us develop a firm grip on the questicns in
the issue and identify options. For example, the een of

i4Executive. ‘privacy. presents. itself, ‘and hs gather.. cbs: Deing:.
‘worked on.

There are others we feel it would be useful for the group
to address and assign responsibility for further work. For

example:
Suggested Action
i. Economie Intelligence and National — ad a

Security--new discussion

"7 ste
2. Covert action and the law _— an

3. The Intelligence Budget--open, black, __ Of
‘or closed--rational and procedures for handling eet
past, present and future a

2 ASF
qu, Joint Congressional oversight committee Cvs
_ for Intelligence
1 7 Sie.
5. GAO and the audit authorities of US. — 7" <p on
Intelligence Agencies ek, ae ge
: cd
6.. Confidential funds authorities, A ay
contingency reserves, legal base, history and uses — OVP - DOD
2 / sre
7. Cover for Foreign Intelligence Actions — CF - Set
legal and administrative issues ; ; Cw?
° Pad Looat
8. Intelligence files and privacy Nv) cae
9. The "fact of" question--international, _ ya
legal and political considerations ; oe
10. "Sources and methods" legislation — OBE
; - of .
, . ee 2 y q
p ply AP it ORG .
Wire 4 foe BY being Lf vege i fey -_ A ;

A
= bhppay BE Gfreuiis Bed ty poe eens
NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 152°

eee ee ee nn St ee eres

* & % FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMAN 7
WOHN G, TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIRMAN

PHILIP A. HARTY, MjCH. HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., TENN,

WALTER F. MONDALE, MINN. BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ. ,

WALTER D, HUDDLESTON, KY. CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS, JR., MO. . -
ROBERT MORGAN, N.C. RICHARD S, SCHWEIKER, PA. ry .

cane nan, cous —- Bibzifea Dinles Benale

WILEIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR
SELECT COMMITTEE TO.
STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH
RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TQ S. RES. 2, 947H CONGRESS)
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

March 31, 1975

t og3.08 ne 2 pst
ih SEO) | -
1S ORT gud? sate

Mr. John Clarke ue cn
Associate Deputy to the D/DCI/IC oe
Central Intelligence Agency

2430 E Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. ‘20505

Dear John:

With respect to our - letter to you of March 17, 1975 .
you will find attached the first list of members of the Committee
' staff designated to receive compartmented information.

With best wishes,
Sincerely,
William G. Miller
Staff Director

Enclosure |

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 153


« + ATTACHMENT 6

The following staff officials of the Senate Select Committee as
identified below by date and place of birth and social security number
have received a security investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation
within the past five years and are hereby certified as meeting the
requirements of Executive Order 10450 for access to classified information
up to and including Top Secret.and are designated to receive compartmented GH

information. Fp, alse pret Ele Pe pee Te ow seh pooh ero ye

¥

"NAME DATE & PLACE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NO.
William G. Miller 8-15-31 N.Y. 109-26-4349
Frederick A. 0. Schwarz 4-20-35 N.Y. 084-30-2047
William Bader 9-8-31 NJ. 545-30-3377
Burton V. Wides 6-14-41 NS. --139-30-1936
Elliot E. Maxwell | | 7-24-46 NAY. 133-34-4225. ©
Daniel O!Flaherty .__ 11-4-42 TlL. 239-62-8495
Michael J. Madigan 4-18-43 D.C. ° ~—-042-34-3797
Lawrence Kieves 1-4-48 N.Y. | ---068-38-6464
Charity I. Benz 7-23-46 N.Y. 053-38-7410
Benjamin Marshall . 5-4-19 Neb. 485-28-4530
Maratha E. Mecham 2-11-40 Cal. 528-48-6848
Audrey H. Hatry . 6-10-23 Md. 216-14-8691 -

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 154


Smpewmtyrs 3s >
cae

rs
ok
rm,

: ‘ s niegen tn ; : sian “F 5 Peroni

Ri ee " . : F prin : ; if i a”

wees fay Sean te enipnon igs . ; ! ‘ : .
oa : :

TEEN,

iy

ey
Lakers legilaniten oe eine by tee

wie Veawe rane g . rane AMER ae tered :
au, t wpe fa ek ny ge be ow Rater BAS : : - sa Vg Ranh eo 8 tae rns
oedtienme et oe TR te aa PRE Rated ot pe see Ee Sahn nae F Teak FP eT UST at
Rogh, wh : : ao eas ’ .
gepricniatge 9 yor: - ste page ee te 2 eee ae a
aqromgiay ye . . BESS IR ant Ue OL a alban leas

et re ”, Ras, Sateiae anoal

TALS

it

scat tee . .
F Ee cart Sapien amy aoa ni ne
ae ee ee re

Fane Cayenne te”
retaee wee SI ore

Ed

en

Sean,

antenna

was yon pe

Skee, He einge aBB Mp intey Conity ean 2, Nit gree gene, Vee

Ser RTA pe te

se
ANCLOSURE]

br

TARE ORTH

Page 155

2

2h

WeR296 Doctd:3:

Bis

&
=


ony

pa

ca

Official DocLab Instruction(s) — Revised 10-Apr-2014

NW’ 86296 Docid:32989628 Page 156


. OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 5010-106 . ‘ a”
atk Bene Sess we. 27 sos
UNITED STATES GO'VERNMENT Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. —

Memorandum ato
Conn oun —
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com. _

TO : Mr. W.R. wartSn, DATE: 4/10/BEeE

NOH pe

‘ npeye , a Ident.
aD
FROM 3 wolfe £ WATIO ox faunal f Wspection
eee egar Aust oy LNPORMAT roe, ALIN Sie To kiliete=

Plon. & Eval.

Co Ree DD =
\ “SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75° ee Ka Spee Iv _
— 0, o_~ Nege

Gen. Inv.

On 4/8/75 Mr. Donald E. Moore, Chairman of the
Security Committee, U. S. Intelligence Board, forwarded
the attached copy of a letter dated 3/28/75 from Mr. William y.
Miller, Staff Director of the Senate Select Committee,
enclosing a list of staff members who have been certified,
for access to classified information up to and including”
Top Secret.

Copies of the list are attached to tickler at ge
copies of this memorandum for retention by personnel who fo
may be in contact with the Select Committee staff. ‘

ACTION:
For information and record purposes.

Enclosures (2) eit

62-116395 Ves
iY,

1- Mr. wt
1 - Mr. Mintz
Il - Mr. J.B. Hotis
1 - Mr. J.C, Farrington
1 - Mr. Wannall yr?
1 - Mr. Cregar
1 - Mr. Schwartz
‘ST-108
REC-40 Ga- 6% 3G Z i

4 Ta ‘
{5 Apa 16.1975

wamenmeany "necthpel® stp,

Xo
3 ‘\
BLAPR gi 8d L \)

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 157


ete aneiedah hh
?
*
ek,
: °

C

eM.

FRANK CHURCH? IDAHO, CHAIRMAN

a - . : :
IFC 1 I
ie ‘ i. 4 d -
PHILIP A. HART, MICH. HOWARD H, BAXER, JR., THEN. : . . . ,- . {

WALTER FF, MONDALE, MINN, BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ.
LTER D. HUDDLESTON, KY. CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS, JR. MO.”

AnuRT MORGAN, N.C. . RICHARD S. SCHWENKER, PAs Dart £0 DPiteofes Ade we ase

WILLIAM G, MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR

JOHN G, TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIRMAN:

SELECT COMMITTEE TO
STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WIT
RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
(euRSUANT To S. RES. 21, 9TH CONGRESS).

WASHINGTON, D.G. 20510

Mawnn 25, L875. , i
Mp. Jom Clarke” es
'. Associate Deputy-to the pypet/ic wo.
’ Central Intelligence Ageney es
2430 E Street, NeW. we
Teseingtcn, ¢ D.C. 20505 © oN
. Dear Jom a a . oe
‘The ‘following staff members of the Senate Select Conmittice = co ae
_ on Intelligence Activities as identified below by date and _ att
.* place of birth and social security number have received a , ao
security investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation | mo,
. within the past five years and are hereby certified as meeting. ae
. the requirements of Executive Order 10450 for access to . rns
classified information up to and including Top Secret. oe moe
_ me ngs 7 co
: - William Miller . Be
: Staff Director ee
. 63. sie39e-4 Af co |
NW 88296 Doctd:32989628 Page 158 __ . EN CLOSURE voy


} TA 3
f “ants . 3ra0ks

4 “‘porothy Widkingon
f roaitbenagon\

rowan?” $e engood

: i Nalace MacDonald.

, ‘Bonjaniny ans ma

r~

mene -
marys @ Oreo

/ ae .

wien Woe ‘ er

= 2e88-hB UE

_ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 159

@

ATTACEMENT

DATE & PLACE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY No.

3-21-33 Th.
aak-bo ) xe
y18-46 Wr
6-13-87 - 08
8-24-52 NA
12-12-47 MA
"11-27-50
(9-29-46 We
68-25. oR

New Lo
Zealand -

(2-21-ha.
12-29-42 IN |
-LO-19-51 — Brazil
a
B-15-3L WY

. 10-24-53 Canada
12138 WY

4-20-35 NY

3-23-54. OH
W-25—lh PY

EN CLOSURE |

” Germany ee

550-bL-7971 -

313-383-877

Lo

390-846-2235 —
“2287-26258
“* 023-hh-8792

213-5O-1123

29650-4123 |
: 2h5<Th-5627 ;
- 5h0-20-6413-
. 566-62-0878, |

307-44~-9707. -

" 225~78~8708
ie . 48522824503
- 109-26-43h9

 920-40~7638 -

97-30-8583 _
oe 084=30-20h7 |
528641965

_ », 282-58-6476
"-566~64~7628

. | (2 eaRe . mii :


e ON

2 - Legal Counsel Division
(1 ~- Mr. Farrington)
1 ~ Mr. W. B..Wannall

1 - Mr. Wee 0. Grepar
The Attorney General April wt, 1975

1 . Director, FRI

| 4 v
—_ UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES “~~.

AEE AMT OCR \ .
As
Co

ae \«* Reference is made io the Senate Select Committee letter dated
March 19, 1975, requesting certain documents from the FBI end my
letter to you dated April 10, 1975, enclosing a memorandum and a copy of the
"Intelligence Division Positicn Paper on Jurisdiction," dated February 13,
1975, less certain exhibits, for the Committec's use.

The purpose of this letter is to make available for your infor-
mation a copy of the aforementioned paper with all exhibits intact. The
Committee's copy of the paper has missing exhibits becouse of "Third /
Ageney Rule" réquirements. Authority to release these exhibits is being {
expeditiously sought so they may be made available to the Committee.

The exhibits extracted from the Committee's copy included
Exhibit I, J, K, BM, and P. >:
’ REC 108 [nz 2 Vos 05 . ae)

Mr. James Wilderotter, Associate Counsel to the President,
has reviewed and _2pproved all exhibits left in the paper and has requested
to review the extracted exhibits after "Third Agency Rule" approval has
been granted. and ‘before the exhibits are forwarded to the Committee.

| will be -doné at theiearliest possible time. ml

‘

am 75

| Enclosure - . @ APR 211

: on “ aN ~*, Caneel
a €7 te Hy a an ae

ee % e ‘ ,
ALL: vb Lt “3 h ) i Lf,

Assoc. Dir. Dy ai * NEY ( we 5 “y oy

Dep. AD Adm. VV yi wt ; 2 eo aN ve .

ep. AD Inv, tt Jd 4 ; eats
a , . z i ee" \ : 4 rit he

ae vs “Fad , “
id if yp wtOP SECRET MATERIAL ATTACHED Ge,
eu b. fy - ne wi
LE ane
x 4 MAIL, goom GA TELETYPE UNIT [) Mey ' GRO $54-546
132888628 Page 160 ois

ell __. _ ee a |


»

~ 1 ~ Logal Counsel Division
. ; 1 - lr, Wo. 0. Cregar
The Attorney General April 9, 1975
\ 1 - Hr. W. R. Wannall
\ Director, FBI
A O,
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
cannes sannmeanernenceretetee o ce . pe oa
Reference is made to a letter from the Senate
Select Committee dated March 19, 1975, requesting certain
documents and other information from the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.
Attached for your approval and forwarding to the
Committee is the original of a memorandum which constitutes
a response to a request set forth in roferenced letter. .
A copy of this memorandum is encloged for your records. ev ,
Processing of the additional requesis is continuing on an
expeditious basis and further responses will be forthcoming.
Enclosures (3) .
: —
DRDingjg fe: on
(6) id _—
1 of
NOTE: This is the most curreht’ FBI Functional Organization Chart. A
new chart would not be available if prepared in response to the Senate
Select Committee's request for approximately 7 to 10 _ ee
ea Wl 7 TEC: yes ok ME IIS
ae)
. . . ‘ ~~ :
i> i, predect : ae)? en mre — nomi vie
Pe fo a ae
ssoc. Dir. amie —
“one a Adm. — % ye fim eet
hast Bice jes you raetayy
Admin. “_ ; ~~ ‘e:
Comp. Syst. —_ a : Qof 1 . we ‘
Ext. Affairs —_ , me pay e ene” es. , Ri I a = Lay t 4 yy tt
ries Rem 1 ered SURE ATTA Pe EE TL ede
inition fi St San \V ° / cag 5
Intell, veh age was t ” py?
Laboratory w 7 ¥ few sae, () a”
Plan. & Eval. am Higs
Spec. Inv.

Training
Legel Coun.

i , ‘ne
“ee wee pv?
elepbone Rm,, ri 2 YI
Ai ehase Beka , Beers uwtr mons


Assoc. Dir, —__.
Dep. AD Adm. _
Dep. AD Inv.

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.
Comp. Syst. —
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com. _
Gen. Inv.
Ident.
Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory
Legal Coun. __
_ Plan, & Eval.
» Spee. Inv.

. Training
Telephone Rm,

NW BEBE Boots Ae ROOM LI | TELETYPE unit J lr oe a

@

1 ~ Legal Counsel Division
\e ee} 1- Mr. W. O. Cregar
Worn . 1- Mr. W. R. Wannall

April 0, 1875

UNITED STATES SENATE SELOCT COLMMUTTER
TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH
RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Reference is made te letter doted Merch 19. 1573
to the Attorney General from the Chairman of captioned Committee
which enclosed certain requests for documents and other information
from the Federal Cureau of investigation (FED.

_In response to the Committee's request for 2 detailed
current organizational chart attached hereto is 2 decument entitied
"EB Tunetionat Organization Chart."

This chart was prepared January 14. 1973. and since
that time the following changes concerning the position of Assistant
Director have been made. The Assistant 1 Director of the Files and
Communications Division is john 1. MeDermoit. The Agsistant
Director of External Affnira is Tonsld W. Moore Jr. The Assistant
Director of the Training Division is VVilliam Li, Mooney.

The various other requests contained im the Committee's
letter of March 19, 175, are receiving attention and response will be
forthcoming at the earliest possible time.

Enclosure

w\A ce ¥ “sy \ :
1 - The Attorney General U a i é
by
NP! <

DRD/PVD: mig/ js “i mys ve
‘TY This document is prepared in response to your
request and is not for dissemination outside your Committee.
its use is Hmited to official pracecdings by your Committice
and the content may not be disclosed to unauthorized
personnel vithout the ospress approval of the PBL,

j, 7 &?

excrost

va

id: 32989628 Page 162


Nae te FAP MOG AR YONE ON ak Sieg foo Ah? ie fhe
We ete athe :

‘eh dag
Sugita hey
bas

di wan te ey
ee ET ye!
ad

oe

area
wo

Th ee awl oe

_ an » -
dryteeg odie Site AA ee Re gaa . : . Te OR ae 8 epee 1

recs

a
Tea ete ( neske gm 2 ody re to
Be ere OR Dad ae aeny art

163°

age

P.

37989628

Bota

iw se296

Tle TRS etiam aiands tee


FIELD OFFICES

ALBANY CHARLOTTE HOUSTON
ALBUQUERQUE CHICAGO INDIANAPOLIS
ALEXANDRIA CINCINNATE JACKSON
ARCHORAGE CLEVELAND JACKSONVILLE
ATLANTA COLUMBIA KANSAS CITY
BALTIMORE DALLAS KHOXVILLE
BIRMINGHAM DENVER LAS VEGAS
BOSTON DETROIT UTTLE ROCK
BUFFALO EL PASO LOS ANGELES
BUTTE HONOLULU LOUISVILLE

ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR-
DEPUTY ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR
(ADMINISTRATION)
THOMAS J, JENKINS

FILES AND

LABORATORY
a DIVISION

ACTING ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
J, WALLACE LAPRADE BRIGGS J. WHITE

ADMINISTRATIVE
DIVISION

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
EUGENE W. WALSH

IDENTIFICATION
* DIMSION

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
RICHARD H, ASH

TRAINING
DIVISION

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
JOE DAVID JAMIESON

RECORDING SECTION: QUANTICO: BUDGET AKXD ACCOUNTING RECORDS SECTION: © FRONT OFFICE;

FICERPRUT SUBMISSIONS FBS ACADEMY ~ TRAINING CENTER ‘SECTION: AUTOMATION AKD RESEARCH FORENSIC SCIENCE TRAINING UXIT
INTERN. \L EXCHANGE FIELD FIREARSS TRAINIKG. ADMIRISTRATIVE REPORT GHIEF CLERK MATTERS PLANMING AND EVALUATION UXIT
GEKERAL CORRESPONDENCE FIREARMS INSPECTION AND REPAIR BUOGET AXO FISCAL MATTERS CUSSIEYING ‘TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS AND
LEGISLATIVE AND LECAL MATTERS DYSERVICE FIREARS TRAINING SUREAY ACCOUNTING SYSTE CONSOLATION CORRESPONDENCE UNIT

LAW ENFORCEMENT CORBAT ARTS RESEARCH
PROGRAM (LECARP)
NATIONAL ACADEMY FIREARMS TRAINING

NEGOTIATED CONTRACTS CORRELATION

PHYSICAL SECURITY #ATTERS.

EXHIBITS SECTION:

ARTIST'S- CONCEPTION DRARINGS
GRAPHIG PRESENTATION OF INVESTIGATIVE

CRYPTANALYSIS-CAMBLING-
TRANSLATION SECTION:
‘CRYPTANALYSIS

POSTIXS SECTION:

FUGITIVE WANTED MOTICES
‘PROBATION AND PAROLE FLASHES

SPECIAL REAPONS AND TACTICS (SPAT)
ECTLON: hive
GARD INDEX $' RADIO STATIONS AND STATISTICAL DATA
CIVIL, CRUMAL AKD DECEASED FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY PREPARATION OF CREDENTIALS ARO
NAME INDICES INSERVICE COURSES SPECIAL FORAS

DEFENSE PLANS FOR DIVISION
LEARNING RESOURCE CENTER Bie retehiririe

SECURITY OF FBS COMBINICATIONS
‘TRANSLATIONS

DOGUMERT SECTION:

TECHNICAL SECTION: ‘COURS TUISTRATIONS AND OPLATS) HARRED PAPER EXAMINA
8 DERE TACTICS COURSES TRIAL EXHIBITS (CHARTS AND MODELS) EAIOFRTE aD OPRUTIRG

CLASSIFICATION AND SEARCHIRG J. EDGAR KOOVER FBI BUILDING TRANING INDERTED WRITING
CRNUNAL FINGERPRINT FILE POLICE STRUGTOR COURSES INK AND PENCIL EXAMIKATIONS
CIVIL FINGERPRINT FILE (ALIEN, CIVIL, .
TERME, WUTART AND PERSONAL SHPERT ORT AND wuuecEuENT TAMING MEGHARIGAL SECTION: GOMMUNIGATIONS SECTIOK: PAPER EAIATONS
IDENTIFICATION) EXECUTIVE OEVELOPUENT COURSES ‘AUTOMOTIVE POOL PxOT

ASSESSMENT CENTER ~ CAREER ‘OGRAPHIC EXAKNATIONS:

‘RADIO COMMUNICATIONS (INTRA‘BUREAU)
‘TELEGRAPH, TELETYPE, AND MESSAGE

ENCODING/DECODING SERVICES,
TELEPRONE SERVICE

MIRE ROOM SERVICES EXPLOYEE PARKING
CEVELOPLENT PROGRAKS ENERGY CONSERVATION
‘TRAINLNG RESEARCH PHOTOGRAPAY
POLICE INSTRUCTOR BULLETINS PRINTING AND REPRODUCTION
FILING AND RAINTEMANCE OF UA ERFORCEQENT SyaPosiuas SPACE MATTERS
FINGERPRINT TACKETS LAN ENFORCERENT SPECIALIZED SCHOOLS SUPPLY AND STORAGE
VERIFICATION OF IDENTIFICATIONS FASILTY DEVELOPER,
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH UNIT Pe: .
IOCROFILING INSTRUCTIGNAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES RSONHEL SECTION:
APPLICANT RECRUITING AND PLACEMENT
AUTOROBILE ACCIDENTS

FIELD CLERICAL TRAIKING ASSISTARCE
FINGERPRINT CORRESPONDENCE
COMMENDATIONS AND AVARDS

POLICE VISITORS
SECTION: B # WAison ~ PROFESsionAL accounTiNG
EXPLOYEE COMPENSATION AND INSURANCE
EXPLOYWENT OF THE HANDICAPPED

PORTRAIT PARLE EXAMINATIONS

PRINTING

RUBBER STAXP, CHECKERITER, AND
OTHER MECHANICAL DEVICES

SHOEPRINT EXAVIHATIONS

‘TIRETREAD EXARINATIONS

TYPENRITING

MISCELLANEOUS:

ASSEMBLY SECTION:

RADIO ENGINEERING
SECTION:

(GW RADIO NETHORK ERGINEERING

FU RADIO SYSTERS

OTHER INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARKING EKANCE COORD!
cemenourconns LIAISON ~ NATIONAL ASSOCIATION STATE EBA. EXPLONNENT OPPORTU MOBILE AND Fourace wag

DIRECTORS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT HEALTH PROGRAMS Habel eteetitened
MASSING PERSONS UNIT LEAVE RADIO FREQUENCY LIAISON COMMITTEES

‘SOCIETIES.
UAAISON = UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA AND

UPDATING ANO ONSEMSNATION OF

WAIL, ROOM {NASOLET)

uns S INTERRATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
E

LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION:

DECEASEO HAND AND FINGER EXALMATIONS.

EVIDENCE EXAMSKATIONS

PHYSICS AND
CHEMISTRY SECTION:

LIVING QUARTERS:

PAY ADMINISTRATION
‘PERFORMANCE RATINGS:
PERSONNEL MATTERS
PHYSICAL EXAMMATIONS

LUISON = INTERAGENCY POLICE GROUP
HEADQUARTERS:

OSASTER (OENTIFICATION SQUAD BIOCERICAL
FINGERPRINT PHOTO LAB BUREAU MANUALS POSTION CLASSIFICATION BIOLOGICAL
FINGERPRINT TESTIBOKY RETIRERENT RATERS
EXPLOSIVES
CHIEF CLERK MATTERS SAFETY PROGRANS
GENERAL APPEARANCE FILE OM CLERGAC RETROTNING COURSES FIBERS AND HAIRS
‘CONFIDENCE “EM ‘VETERANS’ COUNSELING
FIELD POLICE SCHOOLS ‘ CENERAL CREWICAL,
LATENT FINGERPRINT EXAMIKATIONS FORMS WAKAGEREKT ‘YOGATION AND AVOCATION RECORDS GLASS FRACTURES
UATENT FINGERPRINT INSTRUCTION LAN ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES GUNPOWDER TESTS
HATIONAL UNIDENTIFIED LATENT PROCUREMENT AND ADMINIS. GUNS AND AMIUNITION
FINGERPRIAT FILE TRATIVE SERVICES SECTION: UISTRUXENTAL ANALYSIS
SINGLE FINGERPRINT FILE METALLURGICAL

MINERALOGICAL

‘NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS
‘NUMBER RESTORATION
PHARMACOLOGICAL

RESEARCH

TOOLMARKS

TOXICOLOGICAL,

‘W000.

PROCUREMENT (SUPPLIES-EQUIPMENT)
NG

TECHRICAL FIELD ASSISTANCE
RATIONAL BOMB DATA CENTER CONTRAL

INVENTORY RANAGEMENT

AUTOMATION AKD RESEARCH FBEMATIONAL ACADEMY ADWZSSIONS TYPENRITER REPAIR SHOP

SECTION: MOOOR RANGE MUNTENANCE

AUTOMAT IDENTIFICAT DIVISION.
pital SPECIAL AGENT TRANSFERS
cravetnro Ese ARD MOVEHENT UNIT:
FINGERPRINT AUTOMATION RESEARCH
PERSOKNEL LOCATION RECORDS,
SPECIAL ACENT TRANSFERS

RESIDENT AGENCY RATERS.

XRAY

JANUARY 14, 1975 :

PRESS SERVICES OFFICE

FBI FUNCTIONAL ORG

EXTERNAL AFFAIRS

DIVISION

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
JOHN J. MeDERMOTT

CORRESPONDENCE AND
TOURS:

CORRESPONDENCE = CITIZEM INQUIRIES
CORRESPONDENCE REVIEW

MAILING LISTS.

DISTRIBUTION OF REPRINTS

‘TOURS OF FEIKQ

SPEECH MATTERS

RESEARGH SECTION:

FOU LAW ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN
INVESTIGATOR

‘TOP TEN FUGITIVE PROGRAM
FUGITIVE PUBLICITY PROGRAKS.
SPECIAL PROJECTS.

UBRARY

BUREAU-MIDE INFORMATION PROGRAM
‘YOUTHFUL CRURMALITY

RADIOTV NEWS REDIA CONTACTS

. NEWS RELEASES

y COMPUTER SYSTEMS

DIVISION

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ANDREW J, DECKER, JR.

UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING
SECTION:

(UAIFORM CRI REPORTS

LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED OR
ASSAULTED STATISTICS

NATIONAL BOMB DATA STATISTICS.

NATIONAL CRIME INFORMATION
CENTER SECTION:

(NATIONAL CRIVE INFORMATION CENTER/
COMPUTERIZED CRUIRAL HISTORIES
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT

NCIC/CCH OPERATIONS

‘NCIC/CCH CRIMINAL HISTORY CONVERSION

DATA PROCESSING SECTION:

ACCOUNTING REPORTS:

COMPUTER SYSTEMS:
ATA PROCESSING
TELEPROCESSING
‘OPERATIONS RESEARCH
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

PAYROLL

RETIREMENT RECORDS:
STATISTICAL TABULATIONS
VOUCHERS

piocid-3.28896.28—Rag e164 ———_________——__—__

ANIZATION CHART

OFFICE OF PLANNING
AND EVALUATION

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
RICHARD J, GALLAGHER

* STUDIES AND

RECOMMENDATIONS:
OPERATIONS
PLANING

, POLRIES
3 PROGRAMS.

INSPECTION
DIVISION

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
HAROLD N- BASSETT

INSPECTIONS = FIELD AND HQs
SPECIAL PROJECTS .
‘SURVEYS

INTERNAL AUDITS
‘SECURITY COORDINATOR
OOCULENT CLASSIFICATION

oe we

INTELLIGENCE
DIVISION

LEGAL COUNSEL

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
LEGAL COUNSEL
JOHN A. MINTZ

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
W. RAYMOND WANNALL

GOUNTERINTELLIGENCE BRANCH:
€1-1 SECTION:

ESPIONAGE
FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT
INTERIAL SECURITY

G12 SECTION:

ESPIONAGE
FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT
INTERIAL SECURITY

Cl-3 SECTION:

ATONIC ENERGY ACT ~ VIOLATIONS

ESPIONAGE

FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT

FOREICM ECOMOGIC MATTERS

FOREIGN FUNDS:

FOREIGN MILITARY AND RAVAL BATTERS

FOREIGN POLITICAL MATTERS

FOREIGN SOCIAL CONDITIONS

UNTERNAL SECURITY » NATIONALISTIC TERDENCY

MEUTRALITY MATTERS

SECURITY BATTERS AND INTERKAL SECURITY

BOMBING MATTERS

AMTHRIOT

AGT FOR PROTECTION OF FOREXGK OFFICIALS
AND FOREIGN GUESTS OF U.$.

Cl-4 SECTION:

OOWESTIC AHO KILITARY LUISON
FOREIGN LIABON MATTERS
FOREKN POLICE COOPERATION

INTERNAL SECURITY BRANCH;

1S-1 SECTION:

EXTREMISTS AND
ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS
EXTROUSTS
ACTIVITIES
CIVIL UNREST AND ACTS OF VIOLENCE,
EXTREMIST INFORMANTS.

18-2 SECTION:

SEOITON

SABOTAGE

COMMUNIST
GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS

OTHER REVOLUTAOHARY GROUPS AID
‘ORGANIZATIONS

SECURITY INFORMANTS AND COKFIDENTIAL.
SOURCES (EXCEPT ESPIONAGE)

IS-3 SECTION:

CENTRAL RESEARCH
ANALYTICAL RESEARCH
TRADING

SPECIAL RECORDS
DEFENSE PLANS.

LEGAL ANALYSIS

LEGAL INSTRUCTION

LEGAL LIAISON

LEGAL RESEARCH

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR-
DEPUTY ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR

(INVESTIGATION)
JAMES B. ADAMS

MEMPHIS
MIAMI
MILWAUKEE
MINNEAPOLIS
MOBILE
NEWARK

NEW HAVEN
NEW ORLEANS
REW YORK
NORFOLK

GENERAL INVESTIGATIVE
DIVISION

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ROBERT €, GEBHARDT

GRIMINAL SECTION:

ASSAULTING OR KILLING A FEOERAL OFFICER

ASSAULTING FOREIGN PERSONNEL

CONGRESSIONAL ASSASSIMATION STATUTE,

ASSAULTING THE PRESIDEAT (OR VICE
PRESIDENT) OF THE UNITED STATES

ANTOMORILE INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ACT

BANK ROBBERY

BILLS OF LADING ACT

CRIME ABOARD AIRCRAFT

CCRIKE Of INDIAN AND GOVERNMENT RESERVATIONS.

CRIME OK THE HIGH SEAS

DESECRATION OF THE FLAG

DESTRUCTION OF AIRCRAFT OR MOTOR VEHICLES

EXTORTION

FALSE ADVERTISING OR WSUSE OF NAKES TO
INDICATE FEDERAL AGEKCY

FALSE ENTRIES IN RECORDS OF INTERSTATE CARRIERS

FEDERAL CIGARETTE LABELIKG AND ADVERTISING ACT

FEDERAL JUVENILE DELINQUENCY ACT

FEDERAL TRAM WRECK STATUTE,

FIREARMS ACT (A) MATIONAL (B) STATE FIREARMS
CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACT (C) UNLANFUL POSSES-
SION O8 RECEIPT OF FIREARNS

FRANOULENT PRACTICES CONCERNING RILITARY AND
NAVAL DOCUXENTS, AND SEALS AND SYEBOLS OF
AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES

TLEGAL BARUFACTURE, USE, POSSESSION OR SALE OF
EXELEXS AND IASICRIA

ILLEGAL UE OF GOVERMENT TRANSPORTATION

REQU
ILLEGAL USE OF RAILROAD PASS
ILLEGAL WEARING OF UKIFORS
LAPERSONATION
INTERSTATE OBSCEKE OR HARASSING
TELEPHONE CALLS
INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF FIREYORKS
INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF OBSCERE KATTER
INTERSTATE TRAXSPORTATION OF PRISON-ALADE COO0S
INTERSTATE TRAXSPORTATION OF STOLEN CATTLE
INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF STOLEN ROTOR
VEHICLE OR ARRCRAFT
INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF STOLEN PROPERTY
INTERSTATE TRAKSPORTATION OF UNSAFE
REFRIGERATORS
JRAEGULARITIES IN FEDERAL PENAL INSTITUTIONS
XOONAPING
WAY ACT
POLICE KILLINGS
PROTECTION OF FOREICH OFFKULS -

CRUEINAL,
SWITCHBLADE KXIFE ACT
‘THEFT, EXSEZZLERENT, ROBBERY, AND ILLEGAL
POSSESSION OF GOVERNNENT PROPERTY
‘THEFT FROM INTERSTATE SHIPMENT
‘WHITE SLAVE TRAFFIC ACT

GIVIL RIGHTS SECTION:

CIV RIGHTS:

CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1564

DESEGREGATION OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS.
DESEGREGATION OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
DESEGREGATION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
OFSCRLEATION t& EMPLOYRENT
DISCRIEKATION IN HOUSIKG

ELECTION LARS:

INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE AND SLAVERY

MAME CHEGK SECTION:

‘NAME CHECKS
‘SPECIAL MEWORAKDA,

ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION:

ACCOUNTING CONTROL
ADEINISTRATIVE INQUIRIES:
‘ADSORALTY MATTERS
ANTERACKETEERING

HOBBS ACT

LEAACT

INTERFERENCE ITH GOVERNMENT CORXUNICATIONS

‘SYSTEM

ANTITRUST

ASCERTAINING FDUANCIAL ABILITY

BANK FRAUD AMD ERBEZZLEMENT

BOWDSKEN AND SURETIES

BRISERY

CENSUS MATTERS

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

CONSUWER CREDIT PROTECTION ACT

CONTERPT OF COURT.

COPYRIGHT MATTERS

COURT OF CLAIMS.

DEPENDENTS ASSISTANCE ACT OF 150°

DESTRUCTION OF INTERSTATE PROPERTY

EIGHT-HOUR DAY LA

FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT

FALSE CLARS ~ CIVIL,

FALSELY CLADUNG CITIZENSHIP

FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION MATTERS.

FEDERAL LENDING AND INSURANCE AGENCIES

FEDERAL REGULATION OF LOBBYING ACT

FEDERAL TORT CLAINS ACT

FRAUD AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT

INTERCEPTION OF COMBUNICATIONS

INTERSTATE. TRANSPORTATION OF STRIKEBREAKERS

JURY PANEL INVESTIGATIONS:

KICKBACK RACKET ACT.

LABOR MANAGEKENT RELATIONS ACT, 1347

LABOR-MARAGEMENT REPORTING AKO DISCLOSURE
ACT OF 1959 (INVESTIGATIVE MATTER)

UANDS DIVISION MATTERS.

MAIL FRAUD

‘RIGRATORY BIRD ACT

MISCELLANEOUS ~ COIL SUITS:

NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY ACT

OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ORDERS

OBSTRUCTION OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS:

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

PASSPORT AND VISA MATTERS

PATENT MATTERS

PERJURY:

RAILWAY LABOR ACT.
‘RED CROSS ACT
RENEGOTIATION ACT ~ CIVIL AND CRIKQAL
‘SOLOERS' ANO SAILORS? CIVIL RELIEF
ACT ~ 1853
TARIFF ACT OF 1330
UNREPORTED INTERSTATE SHIPMENT OF CIGARETTES
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MATTERS
WAGE AND HOUR LAR
‘WELFARE AND PERSON PLANS DISCLOSURE ACT

” NW-88296_Docld:32989628-Ragete5——

FIELD OFFICES

OKLAHOMA CITY ‘SAN ANTONIO
OMAHA SAN DIEGO
PHILADELPHIA ‘SAH FRANCISCO
MOENIX SAH JUAN
PITTSBURGH ‘SAVANNAH
PORTLAND. SEATTLE
RICHMOND SPRINGFIELD
SACRAMENTO TAMPA

ST. LOUIS WASHINGTON, D.C.
SALT LAKE CITY TOTAL 59

SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE
DMSION

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
WILLIAM Y. CLEVELAND

CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE.
ORGANIZED CRIME SECTION:

ANTERACKETEERING (INTELLIGENCE)

EXTORTIONATE CREDIT TRANSACTIONS

ILLEGAL GAMBLING BUSINESS

ILLEGAL GANBLING BUSINESS ~ O8STRUCTION,

INTERSTATE GARBLIAG ACTIVITIES

INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF GAMBLING
DEVICES

INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF LOTTERY
TICKETS

WATERSTATE TRANSWISSION OF WAGERING.
INFORMATION

INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION IN AIO OF
RACKETEERIAG

INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION OF WAGERIAG
PARAPHERNALIA

RACKETEER INFLUEKCED AHO CORRUPT
ORGAKIZATIONS

SPORTS BRIBERY

‘TOP-ECHELON CROMMAL INFORMANTS

FUGITIVE SECTION:

OKO DEFAULT

CONDITIONAL RELEASE VIOLATORS

CRIMRAL INFORMANT MATTERS

DESERTERS AND DESERTER-HARBORING

ESCAPE AND RESCUE

ESCAPED FEGERAL PRISONERS

FUGITIVES

HARBORING

PAROLE VIOLATORS:

PROBATION VIOLATORS

SELECTIVE SERVICE, INCLUDING FUGITIVE AND
RE-EMPLOYEENT

UNLATFUL FLIGHT TO AVOID CustoDY

‘OR CONFINEMENT
LUNLANFUL FLIGHT TO AYOID GIVING TESTUNONY
UNLATFUL FLIGHT TO AVOID PROSECUTION

EMPLOYEES SECURITY AXD
SPECIAL INQUIRY SECTION:

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPVENT

APPLICATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY AND
APPLICATIONS FOR PARDON AFTER COMPLETION
OF SENTENCE

ATONIC EXERGY ACE (APPLICANT OR EXPLOYEE
INVESTIGATIONS)

ATOMIC ENERGY CONUSSION (CIVIL SERVICE
Cowaassiot

DEPARTRENTAL APPLICANTS FOR PRESIDENTIAL
APPOINTRENTS AND PROFESSIONAL POSITIORS
INTERRATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATION

LOYALTY OF EMPLOYEES OF THE UNITED RATIONS
‘AND OTHER PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS

MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMIMISTRATION.

RATIONAL SCIENCE FOUROATION

PEACE CORPS

SECURITY OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

SPECIAL INQUIRIES FOR WHITE HOUSE,
CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES ANO OTHER
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

UNITED STATES ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMARENT
AGENCY

UNITED STATES IKFOREATION AGENCY.

U, $, COURTS APPLICANTS

‘WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION


OPTIGNAL FORM Ke>. 10 5010-108
oh AN Per CRIION®
GSA GIN. REG. NO, a7 .

UNITEL. STATES GOVERNMENT ‘ee nn
Dep. AD inv,
) 1 _ Mr. Callahan Asst. Dir.:
\’} Memorandum 1 - Mr, Calla oe
\ cer ates
TO :Mr. W. R. Wannall DATE: 4/7/75 Files & Cone
Gen. Inv,
1 = Mr. Bassett | pspncio
FROM :W, ol dkegar 1 - Mr. Mintz nl taf bye ara
O 1 - Mr, Walsh [I Meteor
va UDY 75) 1 =- Mr. Wannall Plon-& Ev. —
SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75 )} 1 Mr. Hotis Spec. Inv. -
ee 1 _ Mr. Cregar Training

Telephone Rm.
Direeter Sec’y —_
This memorandum reports the results of a meeting
of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group on Congressional Review of
the Intelligence Community (hereafter referred to as the
Group), held at CIA Headquarters on the morning of 4/2/75.

The study prepared for the President's Foreign
Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB) entitled, "Human Intel-
ligence," has come to the attention of the Senate Select
Committee (SSC). The major contributors to this report were
the FBI and CIA. It is an extremely sensitive document and
for that reason any requests from any committees of the
Congress for copies of this report should be referred to the
White House, At the present time, the consensus of those
persons in the White House dealing with the subject of release
|. information to the committees of Congress is that this

report will not be provided Congressional committees at this’
time. .

The SSC does recognize a requirement to comply with
the Third Agency Rule which states in effect that classified ere
information or material originating in one department shall aT
not be disseminated outside any other department to which it ~ uo.
has been made available without the consent of the originatané”
department. CIA's General Counsel has produced a paper entitled
"The Third Agency Rule," copy attached, which they have requested
be reviewed by the Legal Counsels of all agencies making up the
Intelligence Community. A copy of CIA's paper referred to above
has been made available to Assistant Director Mintz who has
indicated he will be in direct pee. AR with Mr. Warner, CIA's

General Counsel. G2-é LE =

Attached is a copy of sanitization ftees. Tree
documents provided Congressional Select Committees. he —e
asked that these guidelines be reviewed and CONCUrTeRse. OL

BIN IS UNCLASS
1/0

MH 3
ALL INPORYATTON CONTAINED a Ce
IPLED
BYSPZ nun fe

HER
DATE

Enclosures , : 7
WOC:ebc . a 5
(2) de _ CONTINUED - OVER «fh

a A
LQGUae oe >
NW Lass ago SP AoA QTE


Memorandum for Mr. Wannall
RE: SENSTUDY 75

objections be furnished to the Security Committee of the

United States Intelligence Board (USIB) for consideration,

A copy of these guidelines has been furnished to the Freedom

of Information Unit of the Legal Counsel Division for review.
Their comments will be furnished to the Bureau's representative,
Mr, Frank Schwartz, on the USIB Committee in compliance with
the mandate from the Ad Hoc Group.

, Also attached is a copy of the abstract which all

| agencies of the Intelligence Community are being required to

| use in abstracting information that agency has provided one
of the Select Committees, These abstracts will be retained
in an interagency registry to be available for review by any
members of the Intelligence Community as well as the White
House. The purpose of this interagency registry is to have
available in one location all information in abstract form
that members of the Intelligence Community have provided the
SSC.

Attached is a memorandum for- Mr. John Clarke, Chairman
of the Group, advising the names and titles of individuals on
Congressman Nedzi's staff or on the staff of the House Armed
Services Committee who have been approved for access to classi-
fied material, It is assumed that these persons will have
continuing close relations with Congressman Nedzi and may be
officially associated with the House Select Committee.

Also attached is a letter from Senator Church, Chairman
of the Select Committee, addressed to the President enclosing a
list of documents which the SSC is requesting from the White House.
ACTION:
For information and record purposes,
we

Gum

NW 0296 Docld:32989628 Page 167


oe ©

mor lt
BMEt

iF
revi’

q7vt
Hi

BE,

HATTON
SUNATASS
yal.

ALL T
BERET
pave

Wie
‘}

The Third Agency Rule

_ 1. As early as November 1953, the third agency rule was
included in Executive Order 10501, which has now been revoked.
Section 7(c) prohibited the dissemination of "classified defense
information originating in another Department or agency" to an
agency "outside the receiving Department or agency without the |
consent of the originating Department or agency". The only excep~ |
tion to this rule is that dissemination may be made under the authority
of Section 102 of the National Security Act. This Section authorizes -~-
the Director of Ceniral Intelligence "to correlate and evaluate intelli-
gence relating to the national security, and provide for the appropriate
dissemination of such intelligence within the Government using, where
appropriate, existing agencies and facilities".

2. Historically, the responsibilit ty of the DCI to disseminate
intelligence has referred to "finished intelligence". This product is

-the end result of contributions from members of the Intelligence Commu-
-nity. Therefore, in this situation the finished product is af homogenous
product and therefore the approval for further dissemination beyond the .
_ receiving agency must come from the Central Intelligence Agency.

ra

3. Executive Order 10501 was superseded by Executive Order

- 11652 which became effective lJune 1972. This Executive order did not

specifically cover the third agency rule. However, it does provide the

followirig controls: Sec..9. Special Departmental Arrangements. The

. originating Department or other appropriate authority may impose, in

conformity with the provisions of this order, special requirements with
respect to access, distribution and protection of classified information

. and material, including those which presently relate to communications
‘intelligence, intelligence sources and methods and cryptography.

4. In anticipation of the implementation of Executive Order

11652, a directive was issued on May 17, 1972 entitled "National Security

Council Directive Governing the Classification, Downgrading, Declassi-

. Scation and Safeguarding of National Security Information", This

directive does not contain the term "third agefcy rule" but does have

four subsections which relate to procedures which are similar to what

_ historically had been called the third agency rule. These sections are: -

_ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 168 _

A.(2) Determination of Need-to-Know. In addition toa
security clearance, a person must have a need for access
to the particular classified information or material sought
in connection with the performance of his official duties or

"AN Agus

E ba Mh 3895-— Ge

“


©

Y obligations. The deter Bration of that neéd =

shall be made by officials having responsibility for the
classified information or material. ; .

D. Consent of Originating Department to Dissemination
by Recipient. Except as otherwise provided by Section
102 of the National Security Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 495, 50
U.S.C. 403, classified information or material originating
in one Department shall not be disseminated outside any
other Department to which it has been made available

. without the consent of the originating Department.

E. Dissemination of Sensitive Intélligénce Information.
Information or material bearing the notation "WARNING = « _
NOTICE ~-- SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND .
METHODS INVOLVED" shall not be disseminated in any -
manner outside authorized channels without the permission
of the originating Department and an assessment by the

. senior intelligence official in the disseminating Department
' as to the potential risk to the national security and to the
intelligence sources and methods involved. .___. -

F. Restraint on Special Access Requirements. The
establishment of special rules limiting access to, distri-
bution and protection of classified inférmation and material >
under Section 9 of the Order requires the specific prior -
approval of the head of a Department or his designee.

5 Examples of the application of the Third Agency Rule are:

(a) In a national security estimate, contributions are
received from all members of the Intelligence Community a
then disseminated to members of the community under the
authority of the DCI; oo

_ (b) A CIA intelligence report disseminated to the State
Department may not be sent by the State Department to

the Department of Commerce without the permission of the "_
CIA; ; ce oo:

~ (c) Information which the CIA furnishes the President's
. Commission may not be disseminated to other agencies or
to the Congress without the concurrences of CIA. Thus,
a request from the Congress to the Commission for CIA
information should be referred to CIA for action so that’
the necessary protection of the information can be insured.

NW. 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 169


° (a) Ifthe Navy Department discusses one of its operations
with CIA, CIA may not include information about that operation
in papers it disseminates to other agencies unless it has
received the permission of the Navy Department. The distinc-
tion here is that a Navy operation would not be considered part
of the finished intelligence mechanism and therefore would

not fall within the statutory authority of CIA to disseminate
intelligence. ; oe

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 170


ae 6 DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTON, B. C. 20503
28 March 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR: USIB Ad Hoc Group

SUBJECT: , Handling of Third Agency |Matters in Response
: to Congressional Select Committees

1. As you are aware, Senator Church already has submitted
to me a long list of materials which he requests be provided to his
Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with :
Respect to Intelligence Activities. He has submitted other lists to ; ,
the Federal Bureau of Investigation and to the White House. . It is :
expected that other elements of the Intelligence Community will
be hearing from Sénator Church, mo.

2. “The scope of the investigation necessarily is going to
involve Third Agency |relationships to a considerable degree.

3. Inthe implementation of Executive Order 11652,
"Classification and Declassification of National Security Information
and Material, '' the President directed the following: .

'"D., Consent of Originating Department to Dissemination
by Recipient. Except as otherwise provided by Section 102 ..

of the National Security Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 495,50 U.S.C.
403, classified information or material originating in one
Department shall not be disseminated outside any other’
Department to which it has been made available without the

. consent of the originating department."

Te

4, As regards Section 102 of the 1947 Act, the following
aA quotes 102 (e) in full;

DLE
a CONTAINED

FER INPORBATTIOR

Att,
Hane
DARE

"(3) To the extent recommended by the National Security
Council and approved by the President, such intelligence
of the departments and agencies of the Government, except
as hereinafter provided, relating to the national security, —

anor oot f
b2.- 163% — bP

:NW 88296 Docld:32983628 Page 171


bre re

. community. Clearing “each and every such celéicute with covery

i NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 172

shall be open to the inspection of the Director of Central

Intelligence, and such intelligence as relates to the

national security and is possessed by such departments and

other agencies of the Government, except as hereinafter

provided, shall be made available to the Director of

Central Intelligence for correlation, evaluation and

dissemination: Provided, however, that upon the written

request of the Director of Central Intelligence, the Director .

of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall make available
to the Director of Central Intelligence such information .. ‘ .
for correlation, evaluation and dissemination as may be = Do
essential to > the national security. rt ZL) ’ . Lo -_

5. i I am requested to provide certain materials and Loo.
investigation indicates that the material asked for involves a document .
which originated within an organization other than the Intelligence - ,
Community Staff or the Central Intelligence Agency, the requestor
will be asked to redirect his inquiry to the office of origin..

6. It already is apparent, however, that the documentation - - _
being requested inevitably is going to include references to inter-

, Felationships among various of the elements of the intelligence

agency mentioned could manifestly be extremely consuming: of time
and manpower, . _ .

7. LIpropose the Ad Hoc Group agree on the following procedure. .

Where it appears that truly sensitive matters are involved, the

material will be sanitized by the agency concerned and a check will
be made with the appropriate’ “Third Agency organizations before
release. Where the reference concerns a Third Agency indirectly
or is not considered sensitive and does not pose policy concerns, the
agency concerned may forward the material to the requesting Select
Committee without an item-by-item, _mention-by-mention clearance
with Third Agencies. However, in all cases notification that such
material has been forwarded will be made to the central index and

y a PMLA ARG Ie
A cd , ree * ft

{, ue A Z D :
an i . . if
G+ &. vt
ae Ap otenttotmg i 2 ae :
io aa ‘ . , .

7 - * e  - XN
| oo \

|

mm

Ys

vee “ -. _
“ . .
oo. . D .
.

all agencies alerted through that mechanism. Agencies will
designate on their submissions to the central index, the name and
telephone number of the releasing party.

8. Ad hoc members should be prepared to discuss and
come to some agreement on this matter at the next meeting.

Ge Daregeis
John M. Clarke

AD/DCI/IC

| NW.88296..Docid:32989628 Page t73_ a


y “oe ‘.

- an . @ DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTON, DB. C. 20508

. 28 March 1975

‘MEMORANDUM FOR: USIB Ad Hoc Group |

SUBJECT: Sanitization Guidelines for Documents
- Provided Congressional Select
Committees —

(1. Attached is a copy of a statement, Guidelines for
Sanitizing Certain Documents Provided Select Committees" |
“prepared by the Chairman, USIB Security Cormittee, for
. consideration by the Ad Hoc Group. This step isa follow on to .
.the understanding the DCI has with Senator Church that sanitization
of selective documents will be undertaken before the documents’
. are released to the Committee. Similar under standings have been
discussed with House Staff as well. ;

2. It is important that, to the extent possible, all intelligence ,
. organizations follow generally the same sanitization guidelines. .
Accordingly, the USIB. Ad Hoc Group should consider utilizing these
or similar guidelines within their respective organizations.

3. If requested by the Chairman, the DCI will discuss
orally with the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Senate and House
Select Committees the content of the sensitive USIB or CIA material
excised from documents. Where appropriate, the DCI may discuss |
this sensitive material with the entire Select Committee. He
considers it essential that the written record provided to the
Committee staff not include such sensitive information for the
protection of intelligence sources and methods. . re xo wy

SUL
L-é ee : Say .
Fs nM, Clarke See .
AD/DCI/IC .: ee
Attachment: As Stated a
meted irene

ie, (G3 75 @

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 174

ne @ - J 28 Maeet qe

GUIDELINES FOR SANITIZING CERTAIN DO CUMEN Ts
“PR OVIDED SELECT COMMITTEES

dy The Director of Central Intelligence has recently discussed
: with Sénator Church the need for special consideration and tééatment
. ; by the Select Committee of certain sensitive aspects of intelligence _
a ~ : a “activities and the Senator has expressed his recognition of this need.

“included in such m matters sare the identities of sensitive sources, » the -

Intelligonce services, ; the details of technical devices and systems

. x .

and of operational | methiods,” the ‘identities cf certain employees whose .

: Pe “pafety could be Jeopardized { if revealed, the identities of American _—

“citizens and organizations whio have cooperated with us Intelligence.

ee - Mae . ods oe . . te

7 and : some , additional materials the public disclosure of which would . -

aaron wie Aa: hat *. .

‘create 5 serious > foreign policy or: national security problems, ‘Such .

Z gee ? ste 7 . - at > “fe

: risk of exposure: "Further > ‘Fecoghition should be given to the need .

“to protect certain other ‘information which, if improperly disclosed,

. “might impair tae privacy rights of individuals. : ;


2. One form of this. special consideration may include use
“of sanitization procedures to avoid the risk of exposing such matters
_ and at the same time satisfy the Select Committee's need for a full ©

- understanding of the community's activities.

‘ Be What May Be Sanitized
While itis not : possible to anticipate all requirements which . - : .
may be levied by the Committees for document material and not

pos sible to » determine specifically what material should be excised”
“from these documents, the following illustrations are ‘offered i in

« Jf

” certain Likely categories. The criteria in all cases | should meet
: the test rnentioned d above.

4. Collection of inteligence a _ a an - a ; Dot

| Ls @) The Committee will probably address the matter of how ,

7 ve

, intelligence 2 activities or methods have or may impinge upon individual:

, rights. Documents supporting responses may be sanitized by removal a

a “of identities ‘of sensitive agents and informants, covert personnel,

.S and contractual cover arrangements. A descriptive phrase may be.
substituted, i.e., a foreign journalist, a political official i in the

/ opposition party. No sanitization should be used in . connection with

NW 88296 .Docid:32989628 Page 176


q .
. ' .
. : : .
, ’ +
, oe + o

“names of individuals whose employment or former employment by,
or association with a department or agency, does not remain secret
OF for individuals whose present or future activities én behalf af the
department or agency do not require that previous cover arrangements .
remain secret. . |
(b) Some information may be required with respect to
: ‘technical intelligence systems including eryptologic and communications a

activities and reconnaissance capabilities. Almost all of such material -

4

- is currently handled in compartmentation control channels under

various codewords or nicknames. No security threat is perceived ; -
| by release of these codenames or nicknames in documents. Detaiis _
- of the technical systems involved, contractual arrangements, funding
‘and/ or names of companies or consultants whose participation was
7 obtained under agreement of continued secrecy may be excised from ,
. documents. Any question on release of codeword material should be
referred to the Program Manager who in turn may consult with the : oe
'* Director of Central Intelligence to ensure a consistent approach in 7
the community's ‘sanitization procedure. While: documentary samples -

of intelligence obtained by technical means may be used in support of

verbal testimony, no raw product should be provided the Committees

_NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 177


‘for retention, If absolutely required by the Committees, sanitization ; ,

of such raw product should be conducted to mask the degree of

technical capabilities.

5 Intelligence’ Estimates

Finished intelligence reports of departments and 1 agencies and

‘estimates ao not usually ‘contain source identifications and will not we

: normally Fequire sanitization, However, ‘departments and Legencies

information concerning the internal administration arrangements,

Y of {intelligence agencies may be requested. This may. “include staffing.

vchart® with occupants identified. | Sanitization of individual 1d Taentities 7

oad

“at pervoazél formerty-mot under cover and 1 now + fonctioning-in a cover moe

7 so : pO lyk

: “assignment should be deleted ; as well as those who may in the & fuiure:
be considered for a covert assignment,

7. General

“The following categories of information or specific examples -*

- . Parse -

_ may arise in any number of circumstances in documentation requested  ~
. a a ’ se Vo.
by the Select Committees. In all cases, serious consideration should

“be given by the "department or agency concerned to the necessity of

.

~ . . - : - boy

NW 88296, Docld:32989628. Page 178 2.) -"' -


rr SF

"+ deletion or sanitization of this type of information, prior to
providing the document.
(a) Agent or informant names or operational information

. revealing them, 7

(b) Details which would reveal the effectiveness of sensitive <.  .».
: methods and techniques (1) crmployadd axerseae-tn-hatnan-coueee—
, collection, (2) employed for the physical security protection 0 of the ,

7 department's « or "agency! s personnel or physical environment.

“(e) “The numbers, locations, times and other indications of

i a o recruitment or emplacement of personnel within: targetted foreign a
organizations. _

(a) The success or failure of recruitment attempts in any

, Given targetted foreign organization. . cn oe

2 _ {e) Names of particular employees whose e physical safety or
- Foe . : ~ _

. - future career might be placed in jeopardy by exposure. :

@) | Foreign or US sources, official or otherwise ‘who agreed

to cooperate ander 1 terms ot explicit or implied condidentiality, “who

"would be embarrassed or endangered by disclosure of their ‘role. -
(g) identifying information on intelligence services in ‘friendly -

and neutral countries.

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 179! a ee


NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 180°"

signals intelligence collection, particularly for arrangements which,
7 if revealed, would be politically embarrassing in . the countries oe

a involved.

“technical - vulnerability and extremely high political sensitivity. 7

co iam “CE Details SE “divelesure of monetary arrangements with -- +: _— ot

. intelligence operations. .

. includes names of firms or industrial associations that collaborate

rn

(h) Identifying collaborative operations between the United

States intelligence agencies and other foreign intelligence lidison

services against targets within ‘the country extending the collaborations

OF within a jointly targetted third country.

a Identifying ‘collaboration with foreign governments i in a .

’ coe ‘ - get -- eo
Bot te - 7 cer : ” er, te

et .
eet

a Identification of technical intelligence operations of high

(ic) Specific identification of foreign technical collection

installations involving high political sensitivity in ‘the-host country. -

US and foreign banks, investment houses, ete. » in 2 support of foreigi

n) Specific information on “special relationships with private

tS

i firms established with the approval of top conporate officials. “This

in a special manner such as providing cover for foreign intelligence

‘operations.


e e
{n) Names of firms collaborating with US intelligence
agencies in collection and assessment programs (especially
those having large foreign clienteles). |
| {o) ; Proprietary information relating to contractors

or furnished in confidence..

ES ogy What Should Not Be Sanitized

There a are » general categories of intelligence activities which,

2 ot -o

have already been placed in the public domain by the x mass news | media

“OF. authors with b background experience in intelligence department :

“or ‘agencies “of the > community, Names, places) dates and events

‘ ‘released onder the 1 Freedom of Information Act. No further sanitization

PRL, Ps ON

9. “Techniques of Sanitization
Sanitization of intelligence material is usually considered the |

act of physical removal of the identity of a person, place or thing an
from written communication with or without regard for the residual

.


. . .
- : : . . woof 2
~ : : . . . ’

*, content. Use of a substitution device, either pseudonym or ident
is an example of sanitization which permits intelligent continuity
of the material without revealing the true identity. Sanitization
‘does not extend to the use of false or misleading substitute material
‘this context, |

, The integrity of official records must be > maintained, ; ‘The

. following sanitization techaiques apply only to copies of records.

(a). Physical Sanitization - Names may be cut E out and

tora

a

7 the residual ‘material xeroxed and submitted to Committees. ‘Names

‘may be masked with correction tape and then xeroxed. The Sa ,

tear . ot : voy . Soe ee

7 copy may be submitted to the Committees.
- “(b) Nemes may be deleted and replaced with "IDEN. u 7 ;
7 anita: ~-trnenans The. ~aafea: matesial ie provided on,a, separais. IDEMLLiskabich.. Lees —_ Se
oo contains names or descriptive phrases substituted for dsteions,

.

— a a noe . (e) ‘ “whet material can be retyped or - reprinted with .

substitute phrases or substitute descriptions which do not reveal’ |

- -the sensitive material. . ~~

(d) Entire pages cart be removed from some documents

- and replaced with a blank page carrying only reference information

"4

NWL88 38296...Docld:329896 28 Page.182. 2 cee el od


. as to the location of the sensitive material within the contributing
: department or seoney. This is technique may be employed when |
physical sanitization or excision of material results in wnintelligible
_Bibberish as residue, | .

te) Within a category of inquiry, it it may be desirable ts :

: oo extract a complete document from requested material when the » ak

10... Managernen of Sanitization

™~

upon during coordination.

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page183_


This proposed use of sanitization as a special arrangement.

to protect selected issues contained in material provided to Select

Committees by o one agency may prove to be a futile exercise if not

practiced i in common a by all participating departments and agencic Se

it is essential to the proposal that departments and agencies attempt

to empioy the | same criteria for sanitization and coordinate as
. required, This paper can serve only as general guidelines on

sanitization.

2

-10- Ss

NW 88296 Docld;32989628 Page 184°


FORMAT FOR ABSTRACT OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO
‘THE SENATE (HOUSE) SELECT COMMITTEE
- XINVESTIGATING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

1. SUBJECT: .

2. ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION:
3: NATURE OF MATERIAL:

4. TITLE: ~.

5. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS:

Bb.  -REQUES YOUR:

7. DATE OF REQUEST:

8. DATE OF SUBMISSION:

9. - LOCATION OF FILE COPY/COPIES
10. DOES MATERIAL RELATE TO AN

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY |
PROBLEM? IF SOQ, IDENTIFY:

ee

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 185

‘(Report, briefing, chart, ete.)

tet ee

(A brief narrative statement which
describes content of the material
provided, problems addressed, and
any conclusions or recommendations, |
Summary should be of sufficient
length clearly to convey the basic
thrust of whatever was provided

to the Select Committee. )

oe bie

ba-We 39s)

@ @ ve

IC-75-1951
28 March 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR: Dr. Clarke

SUBJECT

Office of Leg

SECURITY - House Select Committee -
Cleared Personnel

1. The following information has been obtained from the

islative Counsel and addresses those individuals on

Congressman Nedzi's staff or on the staff of the House Armed ~ 7
Services Committee.who have been approved for access to classified ©

material. It
with Congres

is assumed that they will have continuing close relations
sman Nedzi and may be officially associated in the near ;

future with the House Select Committee.

Mr. Frank M. Slatinshek

’ Chief Counsel, Armed Services Committee Staff .

Room 2117 Rayburn House Office Building .
Cleared: TS, SI, TK, B a

Mr. William H. Hogan, Jr... .
Counsel, Armed Services Committee Staff
Room 2339 Rayburn House Office Building

Cleared: TS, SI, TK

Mr. John L. Boos}

Ghairman Nedzi's Assistant for Intelligence -
Matters :

Room 2343jRayburn House Office Building

Cleared: TS, SI, TK, B

2. The following. secretaries are approved for " receipt of.
classified material at the levels indicated:

Berniece Kalinowski (Slatinshek)
Roorn 2117 Rayburn House Office Building

Cleared: TS, SI, TK, B

INW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 186°"

ba Meas

fr ee a ae te ecco ne tet metres nent

¥

Ye On . -. ca 6 - ® ; “ ’
“en 8 soe . . . . .
é Ss >’ v? + .

Rita D. Argenta (Hogan)

Room 2339 Rayburn House Office Building
Cleared: TS, SI

Oneta LL. Stockstill (Boos) ,
Room 2339 Rayburn House Office > Building
Cleared: TS, st, TK ;
3, Safe storage facilities are available in Mr. William Hogan's .
office which have been approved by CIA. Mr, Slatinshek and Mr. Boos’
keep classified material meant for Congressman Nedzi in this area, ,

rk

e , us te . : . . .
Donald E. Moore: ~

’ Dist: RTaylor:mm/28Mar75

O-Adse
1 -IC Reg
1 - SECOM :

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 187:


HOWARD fh RAAT, JH.. TENN, *

trary CoLowaTeiH, & .
CO, MAT! nt, MO,
NCHA G. SOME % a
. iw me nerd ¢
: . amie a 1 f

Pad Dt lg SMe to
FALELJIOY pO LILES CIA e

t

aoe . SELECT COMMNTTES TD .
. . STUDY GOVEPNMEMNTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPACT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
(PunsuaNt To 5. AES. 21, 17H CONGHEES)
WASHINGTON, B.G, 20580

a March 12, 1973

Wee Seen wy,

On behalf Selec 2
Operations With z CELL. es, Senator Tower and
I want to thenk you for the oprertuni head on Merch 5 to discuss
the work of the Committee. I vant to express my personal acprecietion
. for the direct and forthright manner in which you eddressed some cf |’ ,
/ . the initial iay before the Sclect Committee, and your
willingness the Committee to meet its responsibilities under
the randate .
| - We ere thet the work of the Comsittee shovld proceed
ee expaditi and the Comittee is.gratified at tne fil
Le eee BE eo ete a t we have received from the Executive
agencies-up c be in every respect thus *ar, the agencies :
have b fully cooperative with the Committee end the staff and I.
, believ hig augers well for a eonstructive and expeditious conclusion
to our inguiry.

st

foe by
> [ate

Q

ry
caw)
ct

A
ck

a)

mo

DD
Q <

137 % WD
'
a:

Ay anna 9
g

ther pers ra basis
: fox the activities of che
4 unanimous approval of
q n attec
SvUtHS Res. eariiest
opportunity.
!
! With kind regards, . .
. :
l
‘
i
| .
: on

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 188

;
(
:

'

A TPN
th pia

L. Phe reoort furnished

3

2. ALL Executive Orders,

€

foreign or domestic intelligence
3. All Executive Orders, Nationel Sscurity Council memoreande and

directives, and other White House instructions pertaining to the structure,

Special Acticn Greis {and their precedessor organizations, e.g., the Coerations

Coordinating Board, Special Group, 54/12 Groug, 303 Committee, -etc.).


NW 88296 Docli32989628 Page 190

a a OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 . 5010~106 .
“5 By Gtk cen, atc? No. 27 wis j
~- P UNITED STATES yERNMENT =u ] Assoc. Dir.

% 0 Inspection
rrom : Legal Counsell os Aue . Jel i ao
C> We |e Plan. & Eval, —

SUBJECT: SENSTUDY ae oA sree ae ro
ee ees yd dbo? ud oun,

alternative the Bureau prepare a lis

Dep. AD

Dep. AD Agen

Asst. Dir.:
Admin,
Comp. Syst. ——

Ext. Affairs —_.
Files & Com,

Memorandum s&s

Mr. J. B. Adams a
a

DATE: 4-3-75
Gen. Inv,

£ re t is dent.

s

Tel&ph: Rm —

By memorandum dated 3-20-75, you were advised of a Diractor Sec'y _—
request received from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities.
The Intelligence Division requested that an attempt be made to modify portions
of the Committee's request.

Regarding Part I titled Legal Authorities, the Intelligence Division
pointed out that this particular request was wide-ranging and required a considerable
file review as it requested any memorandum discussing the legal authority of
the FBI to (1) investigate internal security matters, (2) collect intelligence
information, and (3) engage in counter -intelligence activities; together with
copies of all constitutional and statutory provisions, executive orders, presidential
directives, Attorney General opinions and memoranda, and any other materials
asserted as sources of such authority.” With regard to Part II concerning the
FBI's administrative organization, they requested the identities by name of personnel
in the Intelligence Division, Unit Chief and above. This caused concern in the
Intelligence Division that there would be a needless proliferation of a list of
Bureau personnel working in this field which list, of course, would be of interest
to foreign intelligence sources. ii i

On 4-1-75 Inspector John B. Hotis and SA Paul V. Daly discussed i
these matters with William Miller, Staff Director of the Senate Select Committee;
John T. Iliff, who has been nominated to head the task force for the Committee
looking into FBI activities; F. A. O. Schwarz, Counsel to the Senate Select
Committee; and staff member Michael Epstein. They agreed to modify the request
in Part Il to the extent that personnel in the Intelligence Division need not be.
identified by name below the level of Assistant Director in the organization chart |
to be furnished them pursuant to theiz, request of 3-19-75. They asked as an

i personnel in the Intelligence Division down
to the level of Unit Chief with names inghtded which they would have access to

review in Bureau space. - if
REGAL (62 -//6 24 < U

1 -Mr. Hotis - Enc.
1 - Mr. Daly - EitGesm: cen sauna
CONTINUED - OVER

Enclosure x
1 -Mr. Callahan - Enc. iI 1-Mr. Mintz - Enc. . he
1 -Mr. Adams - Enc. " 1 - Mr. Farringtog - facy - 1975 \l ius

1 -Mr. Jenkins - Enc. your
1 -Mr. Walsh ~ Enc. G
i -Mr. Wannall - Hine.

PYD:AANDR 2.2 gp, 2”


£ . 1

rn : .

“ey ¥
t. a ® i

Legal Counsel to Adams Memo
RE: SENSTUDY 75

With regard to Part I relating to legal authorities, they stated
they were amenable to the Bureau furnishing them whatever documents they
have retrieved up to this time which have been recovered pursuant to their
request of 3-19-75 and that no additional detailed review need be conducted
until they review the aforementioned documents. At the end of their review
they will make any additional specific requests concerning this part of their
request. They also asked that in our response we furnish them copies of documents
listed on a three-page paper prepared by the staff of the Senate Select Committee,

a copy of which is attached.

Staff Director Miller requested that the Bureau expedite their
response to the Senate Select Committee's request as the first meeting of that
Committee is scheduled for tL Wednesday,,.AsQ=15..W2nd he felt strongly that they
must have mw material that showed progress in their study of the FBI prior to that
time. Mr. Miller requested that, if necessary, the request be responded to in
a piecemeal basis and that the complete response does not necessarily have to

be made at one time.

It is suggested that we make available to this Committee as soon
as possible those documents which we have furnished the General Accounting
Office (GAO) which also fall within the 3-19-75 request of the Senate Select
Committee. In this regard staff members have advised they are in contact with
GAO auditors concerning the FBI.

By way of observations it is obvious that the staff members of
the Committee are well versed in Bureau policy and procedures. To this point
they have been cooperative and we should insure that we give a timely response
to their various requests.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

(1) That the Intelligence Division advise whether modification
of the Senate Select Committee's request concerning legal authorities for
investigations and the modification of the table of organization of the Intelligence
Division are acceptable and, if so, expeditiously prepare the necessary response
to the Senate Select Committee. pee

ay :

Midi’

RECOMMENDATIONS ep
CONTINUED - OVER,

v

NW 88296 Docid:32969628 Page 191

Legal Counsel to Adams Memo
RE: SENSTUDY 175

“

(2) That we furnish all information which has previously been

furnished GAO and is within the ambit of the Senate Select Committee's request.
Wea Mone i bgcld 3 CHO Mveeared, B28 tae Srvva tess areihin-
Donte d 5SC, Heeborns ge reunite SEC Halts,

(3) That as our response to any one of the five particular area aR
of inquiry as set forth in the 3-19-75 letter is completed, we furnish it to the it,
Senate Select Committee. Mb

(4) This material should be sent to the Deputy Attorney General
by letterhead memorandum, the first paragraph of which should specifically ;
identify the request, for review and subsequent transmittal to the Senate Selec
Committee.

Pe
eo eS

NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page 192


nya Of inoeelalbe oer tlod waaay bor. bs cae

betwee ae

Lou Gree,

Gon Tras {
Lon “On Lower 2 . Gree

ETOP. Toe 2Me fale Ov aver. “Esdon 4
ene a a ee ner eee

Unit ven ah

®, enor prenered on Jurisdiction which was discussed

- Direog vor Grey and others eb & Guentieo necting on May 22 4
ue io at
end eh. 2o7h. Ic. tip. 252, =

2, Momorcnadum fro. the DL yoocer ef the FLE vo the
Loney Gomera... doved Aucuct 7. LTS: rocommondinre the
2 Of ern excencive order concorminn che BULnOre ty o> 1
: vo conducs Gomes ic invellicence opornclous. 6ae aa
the KG Lorne? Ganerel's reply to this i MeMOranaua which is
published in the Joint Hearincss before the Subconmitvee on
Adisinis $y tive Prectice and brocadure end the Subcommitece
1 Gonstitviionel Rights, of the Cormritice on the Judicilery |
and the & Mpcowk tec on Gurveilianes o- She Comnbitees on

BPoreinn i on teated mo. Uinety-thi sa Con (Second uoession on
Verranblone irevonpins end ilesir Survotlisnesa (17: ).

en engeerre
Pre a ee

Me
le
se
+e
je
0
tes
ar
‘fo
aa
S

J
: - 4, An Invcllicenee Divteton scudy :
ro so the Offico of Lerel Counsel. Dopesbnens of dus:

, Dheee soe kheliey. Goo Nearins before the Subcom

eee)
509

‘
O Wa ch be Fy

TZ Overcich: of the Committees on the dudieiary, United
Sinton woenete. Niner Third Con Poss (Socond Session) on
be. 21056. Ton-Yorr Torn for Ppt 2 ar (297), np. 12-15.

Be Morora: mmm From Abtorney Goneral Clark to Diractor Ped
Hoover, dsted Sebtenber 14, 1267, See Heerinzs before the :
tomilétee om Internal Security, louse ef Ropresenwetiven.

Raine ty~Taied Connress (Seeond Sessten). bon nano need Leees “
Oners ions Sor Taternal Geeurk toy Parnonss. Varo © (igphy,

TEC re

a cwren oe

- two PNT 18, wht eh reeord instructions from 7

: Roosavals to UL poetor Hoover e@oncermini: SBI inves vi * 4

. subversive setivioles. end wiien indies tc meetines 4
Beast dairy hootivels end ibveccos Hoover on fucus’ f "4

Sl, TG. G2. 3308-3507. |

’ vn c Yirantor Hoover to Assocleata Dirececor u
; Yerse, Gibed Soentcembor 1O, 1955, Ed. au np. S2TT. 1
Go. Pr one dan bat directives daved Gontenbar 0. 195% 4

tT) e 1 x . rye . a

seery C, MSs daly On, LEO; and Lecompiur Lo. LoS. 3

2. yn re 1
Mee ee

Te. t% Dus os


fl
H
H
i
i

a

‘States Senate, Ninety~Second Congress (Second Session), on

NW_88296_Docid:32989628 Page 194_ oe

Ns nee —_——_ —-

re ee . es
inmeness of the types of materials requested under 2 Part TT: 7
Sie Sed ue =

eibconmul tia or Consta awh oneal Richts of the CowailWFee on the
dudiciany, United States Seante, Tainety- Second Congress
Gbest Session), on wedern Dabe Hanks. Computers and the Bill

af Rights (lovl), rere Tiny pp ire Trr

“See Delelad ba ba Agrecnent in the leering before the |

2. See Agreement of Coordination in the Hearings before
the Comittee on Internal Security, House of Representatives,
Minety-Third Consress (Second Session), Dom sstie Intellirence

Onere. Grows for Tnternal Seeurk oy parmoses (lua) Part 2,
5M pean ements aotinanernnntasimnnttey sieterrattttrestremt mttaer

pp. 5309-3505.

Yor references to items requested in Part IV, see:

Le Hearings before the Conmittee on the Judicisry, United

the Nomins. tion of Richard CG, Kleindienst,of Arisona, to be
Attorney Goueral (L972), pp. o35-69.

2. earings before the Committee on Internal Security,
Ilouse of Representatives, iimety-Third Congress (Second
Seanion) , Dom ae eae ReneS Onerations for Internal
Security J pie Dp. 3509-3570, .

a

3, Ilearines before the Judiclary Committee, United States
Senate, pene ty Third COneress (First & Session), on the Nomina—
tion oft 30 Gray TTT. of Connecticut, to be Director,
Federal. aeons LOR Vosbn acto (L975), pp. L50-T5T. o_

An oxeised vopy of the I Report recuested under Pert Vy, Thoma A,

is published in the record of the Ilearings before the Coin bce
on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Mnety-Third
Congress (Sceeond & 25L0n) , pursuant to I. Res 803 (Impcach-
mont), Rook VII, Parb 1, pp. 30-31.

the original COLUTELPRO Report yitich iis requested in part “Ay,

com, Lo voterred to in the liearings before the Civil
Rights and Constitutional Rights Subcowmittee of the Commnittec .

—

on the Judiciary, House of Representatives (itine ty-'thivd oes ess,
Sceond Session), ENE Counterintcllisence Programs (LOT), p. 21, .

pen ~ “ = yee . '

an ~


wen Memorundum from the Atborney General to the +
<Diréetor, FRE, dated May 20, LOS'u, captioned “hicrophone

~ Suryediiaance." Secffpoarincs before the Subcorgittee on
“Adnttiistrative PracWJre and Procedusve of the Ghaivteo on

the. Judiciary, United States Sonate, Hinety-Second Consress

(Second Session), Warvantiess Wiretenning (1972), p. 178.

—

“

tare a ~ 1

NWA68296 Docld:37989626 Page 195

¢
Assoc. Dir.

. Dep. an bes Vi
, Dop. AD Inv.

Asst. Dir.:

& ORTONAL FORMLNO. 10 010-106
RR tee to. 27 :
UNITED STATES . ee

L) —— Memorandum pesos!

Admin.

RG om +S i nS . j 5 d S Comp. Peal —
yy oy " Ext, Affairs
fr :Mr. J. B. Adams peer : Files & Com, —
a“ C : cn
| ‘ te Inspection
FROM \ : Legal Comme ; . ees Intell
\ Shas be yo 13" Lf? sek
’ ao 1 Plo Eval,
susject|\NONGRESSIONAL, -COMMITTEES _ | Spe, In
REVIEW OF FBI OPERATIONS Taloshone Res
AEN et a Director Sec’'y —_
The purpose of this memorandum is to recommend that all {
responses for the production of records, etc., received from Congressional ,
committees be forwarded by letterhead memorandum through the Deputy ey 4

Attorney General to the requesting committee, and also that in selected instanges
a property stamp or statement be affixed to certain documents limiting neces |
Se mre

With the proliferation of committees in Congress looking into 3 <
FBI operations, it is essential that a standard procedure for the forwarding o '
documents to the requesting committees be established. Inasmuch as requestg™
such as the request of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities

have been forwarded-to this Bureau through the Department, it would appear ~g
logical that responses to such inquiries and all other inquiries of Congressional } _

committees, whether they be directed to the Department and/or the Bureau, x ay
‘be responded to through the Department. Such a procedure not only will makey + *
all our responses consistent but will dlso give the Department an a) SAS
review and approve documents being made available to Congress. Hh, ie ~~ a

In connection with our preparation of responses to requests thee Bs

Congressional committees, it is suggested that all responses should be by
letterhead memorandum, the first paragraph of which should clearly describe
the specific request which is being iis eae to in the letterhead memorandu

RECSIG —//4 3 &
In those instancedjhere documents dre of a nature that: werare
not desirous of unauthorized personnel, whether they be in Congress or otherwise,
having access to, we should affix a property stamp. This property stam prstoul deus

read as follows:
APR 11 1975 |

"This document is prepared in response to your request andes
is not for dissemination outside of your Committee. Its use
is limited to official proceedings by your Committee and the

contents fay.not be disclosed | to unauthorized personnel without
€ express approval of the F

1 - Mr. Adams ; Bi - Mr. Farrington

1 - Mr. Callahan Gee i - Mr. Hotis tot sph
1- Mr. Jenkins ibe Gin 1 - Mr. Daly seth ®

1 - All Assistant Directors i ry ve
PVD: is (21) N 11 1978 RECOMMENDATIONS - OVER “

sdb pddpaosgl ror 196


NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page 197

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams Memo
RE: CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES
REVIEW OF FBI OPERATIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS:

(1) That all responses to Congressional inquiries concerning
FBI operations be forwarded to the Congressional committees by letterhead
memorandum through the Deputy Attorney General. Upon approval, these
letterhead memoranda will be hand-delivered to the Deputy Attorney General's
office by Legal Counsel Division.

(2) That in instances where access to a particular document
should be limited because of the contents of that document, a property stamp
in line with the above be affixed thereto.

ve of _ (‘an Cfo —
ar i ey

“Gy
it .
feily


re 1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall
ra il - Mr. W. 0. Cregar

April 8, 1975

ies TULTED STATUS SMUATS SELLCT COMMETTTR
TO STUDY GOVERMIENTAL OPLRATIONS LTH
RESPECT £0 INTELLIGUNCL ACTIVITIES

Reference is made to letter dated harch 19, 1975,
to the Attorney Goneral from the Chairman of captioned
Committee, which enclosed certain requests for documents
ond oper information from the Federal Bureau of Investiga-

ton (5 .

Attached are copies of various documents which
are jurisdictional agreements between the FBI and other
Federal agencies or guidelines prepared by the Attorney
Goneral with reference to investigative responsibilities
betiveen the PBI and other Federal agencies insofar as they
pertain to internal security, intelligence collection,
and/or counterintelligence matters, operations, or activities.

lL. Delinitations of Investigative Duties of the
FRI, the Office of Naval Intelligence, the Intelligence
Division of the Army and the Office of Special Investigations,
Inspector General, U. &. Air Force, dated February 23, 1949,
with supplemental agreements 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Supplemental
agreements number 2 is no longer in offect.

2. Agreement between the FBI and the Central
intelligence Ageney, dated February 7, 1966, classified
fecret.

3. Agreement botyveen the FBI and the United States
Secret Corvice, effective Tuly 30, 1973.

- RIMsmam _..
Assoc. Dir. (6)ce®

Dep, AD Adm. .

; Dep. AD Inv. 1 4 ft

} Asst. Dirs: 4
“Admin, " j

Comp. Syst, —_

Ext. Affairs *
Files & Com. ‘ a -

- 1?
SSCROT MATERIAL apgscHna AL yi

Gen. Inv.

Ident.
Inspection
Intell.
Laboratory { 1 et

ty-
Plon. & Eval. _. }

Spoe. Inv. /, . 7 ; - - ; bb

Training

! Lega! Coun,
Telephone Rm. __ ~
ices Sey me ROOM = , SUBTYPE unit (_] Tra wy Ss
> 88296 Dochd:329896. age aie
ry ™ ial . g —t _ on - s

GPO 955.845,

‘~~

ee
© esas

P*

Assoc. Dir. ___.
Dep. AD Adm. _
Dep. AD Inv.

Asst. Dir:
Admin.

Comp. Syst, —_

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv.
Ident.
Inspection
Intell.
Leboratory

Plan. & Eval. _.

Spec. Inv.
Training
Legal Coun.
Telephone Rm.

at: webebae Godaese

L- Mr. J. A. Mintz

The Attorney General April 8, 1975
iL - Mr. W. R. Wannall

,]
Director, FBI 1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar

‘o
UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT oarree
ON INTELLIGENCE” ACTIVITIES

Cae in

Reference is made to a letter from the Senate
Select Committee dated March 19, 1975, requesting certain
documents ana other information from the Federal Bureau of
Investigation,

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the
Committee is the original of a memorandum which constitutes
a response to the request entitled, "Jurisdictional
Agreements." A copy of this memorandum is enclosed for
your records. Processing of additional requests is
continuing and further responses will be forthcoming.

(2) REG. 10g
4 (72 -/

ve ‘Snitennatinteate

Enclosures

RLIMsmam . ~~
(6)°"

[vk

SECRET MATERIAL ATTACHED -

S05,
Poa,
oe
ou?
a

A497 B00m ("j TELETYPE uNIT{_) Me
132989628 Page 199


UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH
RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

4. Investigative guidelines with reference to
Title 11, Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, Regulation
of Explosives, prepared by the Attorney General of the

lone States, submitted by letter te the FBI on January 11,

The various other requests contained in the
Committee's letter of Narch 19, 1975, are receiving attention

and response will be forthcoming at the carliest possible
Me,

Inclosures (4)

1 - The Attorney General


be
(.

sh tn

Ba an te te a : oT —— ees. 2
256" Docld- IFO zeae bor : emer came dai Sy mpc

Ww Ss.

Ae NTP ap phe nema UH eee


ae

. at a “> ’ te * Pn re .
ees ee A tse TE Ae rae et ari’ vet S seit

- Bébruary 23; 1949

Subject: Dedimitation of Investigative Duties of
the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the
- Office of Nawal Intelligence, the

Intelligence Division of the Army and
the Office of Special Investigations,
‘Inspector Generali, U. S. Air Force.

ein Mite OB yl Que niey, » ane, Agresmenk, for. Coordination of the

“ 7 Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office

of Naval Intelligence, Intelligence
Division of the Army, and the Office of
Special Investigations, Inspector General,
U. S. Air Force. —

sow lt

I. Ths undersigned have reviewed the directive contained in the
Presidcat's Mencrandum of June 26, 19239, as augmented by his
Directive of Saptember 6, 1939, the Delimitations Agreement of
February 9, 1942, and the Presidential Directive of October 30,
1947. im addition. ceanizance has been taken of the provisions
Cr th? Atomic Energy ACT of 1940, and the specifics application
of that Act is set forth in Section II hereof, All other pro-
Visicus of this Agreement are anart from and have no relation to
the stated requirements cf the Atomic Energy Act. In view of the
above, it is new agreedthat responsibility for the investigation
of ail activities coming under the categories of espionage,
counterespicnags, subversion and sabetage (hereinafter referred
to as "these categories") will be delimited as indicated herein-
after, The responsibility assumed by one organization in a given
field carries with it the ebiigation to exchange freely and
direcliy with the other subscribing organizations all information
of mutual interest. When the erganization with primary operating
responsibility is unable for any reason to preduce material in
that field desired by the subscribing agencies, such special
arrangsments as may be Legal or desirable will be worked out
through negotiation at the national level prior to activity by
one agency in another agency's field. It is recognized by the
subscribers hereto that the Headquarters Department of the Army
has decentralized such functions to its major subordinate commanders.
When the major suberdinate commanders of the Department ef the
Army cannot effect satisfactory special arrangements, the matter
Will be referred to the Director of Intelligence of the Army for
further negotiations at the national level. Close cooperation
and coordinaticn between the four subscribing organizations is

a mutually recognized necessity. :

16 hg
- , - ED
eon cont
. . ps 3 CLASSES y -
pSRE -p | Be
pats ioe" ,

NW. 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 202 .


IT. "EBL will be ‘responsible ‘for:
nen Eas eit: investigations: ‘of cages th these: categories: involving. -

civilians and foreign nationals»of all classes in the continental -

United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Isiands, the State of

Hawaii**, and the State of Alaska* except as specifically described
_hereinafter in Paragraph ¥, Section 5.

2. A1l investigations of violations of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1946. There are no territorial or personnel limitations on
this provision. .

. 3. The coordination of the investigative activities of

» Civilian agencies in.the United States, .Puerto Rico, the
‘Virgin Islands, “and the State of ‘Alaska’ ‘except ‘as specifically
described hereinafter in Paragraph V, Section 5, which provide
information regarding subversive movements and activities in
these categories.

4. Keeping the other subscribing organizations advised of
important developments in these categories within its cognizance,
particularly:

a. Activities cof inactive reserves of the armed
service, including the National Guard.

b. Developments affecting piants- engaged in armed _
ferees contracts.

c. Developments: concerning the strength, composition,
. and intentions of civilian groups within its
. cognizance which are classed as subversive and
whose activities are a potential danger to the
security of the United States.

d. Developments affecting those vital facilities and
vital utilities which have been designated by the
Secretary of Defense.

“e. Developments affecting critical points of trans-
portaticn and communications systems which have
been designated by the Secretary of Defense,

(For b, d, and e above no protective coverage is contemplated.)
=a Q-

*Editorial revision of this Agreement to reflect the statehood
of Alaska was approved by the IIc on January 7, 1959.

#*Revision to reflect the statehood of Hawaii was approved by the
Xie on September 9, 1959,


. * . “ . . . Po . .
€ - ~ .
. ae tote . . . Pans . . et tee . . woe eaey ty er . nat — oar
sia hay ee a out OP fe ne Foose ts wee en cag sat fe Dhar. teeter ea ye Cede ne, Tee ett
sere Teme ge be tat ay oe Se ates Bare ees A at pis ad te ete YE DT et Bh fie MONTE ED 9 OU, OT
. ‘ who 2 wt a aes Tn . : palin . 7 ? toe Es
. . z . . . .

oe 2 tt age et Ota tel toe oe eth tle
WE See as Bote eT NE Ca dae wo

Eytte tyre toe Oe

‘Il. DD, Army will: be responsible for:

1, The investigation and disposal of all cases in these
categories involving active and retired military personnel of the Army.

2. The disposal, but not investigation, of all cases in these
categories involving civilian employees of the Army in the
United States, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

¥ : ‘

3. The investigation and disposal of all cases in these _
categories involving civilian employees of the.Army stationed in | .
Virgin Islands, except that part of such investigations as have
ramifications in the United States, Puerto Rico, or the
Virgin Isiands.

4, The investigation of all cases in these categories involving
civilians and foreign nationals who are not employees of the
other subscribing organizations, in areas where the Army Commander
has supreme jurisdiction over the armed forces stationed therein,
including possessions of the United States other than Puerto Rico

and the Virgin Islands.

. 5. Informing the other subscribing organizations of any
important developments. ,

6. Advising the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the identity
and location cf the plants engaged in Army contracts.

IV. ONI will be responsible for:

“1. The investigation and disposal of all cases in these cate-
gories involving active and retired naval personnel of the Navy.

2. The disposal, but not investigation, of all cases in these
categories invelving civilian employees of the Navy in the:
United States, Puerto Rice, and the Virgin Isiands.

3. The investigaticn and disposal of all cases in these
categories invelving civilian empleyees of the Navy stationed in
areas other than the Unitéd States, Puerto Rico, and the .
Virgin Islands, except that part of such investigations as have ~
‘ramifications in the United States, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands.

4. The investigation of ail cases in these categories involving
civilians and foreign nationals who are not employees of the
other subscribing organizations, in areas where the Navy Commander
has supreme jurisdiction over the armed forces stationed therein,
including possessions cf the United States other than Puerto Rico and
the Virgin Islands, and in the State of Alaska except as described
in Section 5, below, ~

: -3-

“aréas other than the United States,‘ Buérte Ried, and “the” fate oe warmed

an ae Sunt epee cate (Sow ie GP oD ee ante ed oy, coe eee Ltt te
we ey oR, gs sae > eee a le a te an

5. The investigation of d411 cases in these categories involving

civilians and foreign nationals who are not employees of the cther

subscribing organizations and with the exception of civilian employees
of the Executive Branch of the Government on Kodiak and Afognak
Islands adjacent to the Alaska Peninsula and Adak Island in the
Aleutian Chain.* :

6. Informing the other subscribing organizations of any
important developments. ‘ . ;

... Io. Advising the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the identity

“+ and “Location 6f the’ plants engaged in Navy’ contracts.

“"“V,. The Office cf Special Investigations, Inspector General,
U. S. Air force wilt be responsible fore

_ i. ‘The investigation and disposal of all cases in these cate~
gories involving active and retired military personnel of the
Air Force.

2. The disposal, but not investigation, of ail cases in
these categories invelving civilian employees of the Air Force
an the United States, Fueriu Kavu, and che Virgin Isiaads.

2. The investigation and disposal of all cases in these
categories involving civilian employees of the Air Ferce stationed
in areas other than the United States, Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands, except that part of such investigations as have
ramifications in the United States, Puerto Rico, or the ;
Virgin Islands,

_4. The investigation of all cases in these categories involving
civilians and foreign nationals who are not employees of the
Other subscribing organizations, in,areas where the Air Force
Commander has supreme jurisdiction over the armed forces.
stationed therein, including possessions of the United States
other than Puerte Rico and the Virgin Islands. The investigation
of the same cases described above in that portion of Alaska
described in Section 5, belew, with the exception of civilian
employees of the-Executive Branch of the Government. —

__.5. The investigation of all cases in these categories involving
civilians, except as described hereinabove, (1) in that part of the
Alaska Peninsula which is separated by a line drawn from Iliamna Bay

-4-

-®This paragraph added, See IIC Working Committee Minutes of

September 15, 1954, and June 8, 1955.

“t -
~

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 205

“tey


"4 aad wt ae trey he Sat
Pe Cr aia ware yates

northwest to the town of ,

south shore of Lake Iliamna to the Kvichak River to the Kvichak
Bay; (2) in the islands adjacent to the Alaska Peninsula excluding
Kodiak and Afognak Islands which are the responsibility of the
Office of Naval Intelligence; (3) in the Aleutian Islands excluding
Adak Island which is the, responsibility of the Office of Naval
Intelligence; and (4) in the Pribilof Islands.*

ihe

6. Informing the other subscribing organizations of any
important developments. « .

“ao” Ravising ‘the Poderdl- Bureau ‘of Investigation of the-identity
._ and Location cf the plants engaged in Air Force contracts.

VI. 1. Where Sections III, Iv, and V involve general territorial
coverage, responsibiiaty for such coverage will pass from one
element of the armed forces te another automatically when a

change of command responsibility ensues. This provision is
subject to modification by divest agreement between the interested
elements of the armed forces.

2. While investigative jurisdiction over the civilian
populace in former enemy tees tories scoupisd by the armed forces
has been provided fer sm Sections III, IV, and V above, those
provisions are subject to divest adjustment: with the Department
of State if and when that Department asocunes gevernnental
direction in such areas of sccupation.

VII. From time to time it may be desirable in the light of

ee

changing conditiscns to modify er amend this Delimitations

Agreement, Subject ts the exceptions already provided for
above, general amendments or. madifications involving all of the
four subscribing organizations shall be issued in the form of a

‘revised Delimitations Agreement and net as separate instructions.

VIII. During pericds of martial law, or periods of predominant
armed forces interest not involving martial law, when agreed upon
by the subscribing agencies, the provisions of Appendix A or B,
hereto attached, wili additionally apply.

IX. All agreements of a continuing nature and applicable to two
or more of the subscribing agencies to the Delimitations
‘Agreement which affect the. basis jurisdiction thereof which are

=5- - co

*original paragraph changed. See IL¢ Working Committee Minutes of
September 15, 1954, and June 8, 1955.

NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 206

Old tiianna and thence following: tha” 7°.)


now or hereafter mutually entered. into by any of the subscribers
thereto will be reduced to writing; will thereafter become
supplements to the Delimitations Agreement, and distributed
only to the extent agreed upon by the co~-signers.

APPROVED

NW 882796 Dochd:32989628 Page 207
a

(Signed)

yf.

€

(Signed)

' (Signed)

S. Leroy Irwin
Diréctor of Intelligence,

_ Department of the Army,

*
: re nT oa
bee

‘ thomas B. Inglis | a
Cnler o aval intelligence

__Je Edgar Hoover
Director, ledera urecau oO nvesti~
gation .

goseok Fe Carrot

gations, "inspector General, U. S. Air
Force


APPENDIX A

PERIOD OF MARTIAL LAW

I. It is further agreed that« when a state of martial law has
-peen declared by the President, the armed forces ‘commander will ©

2

.assume responsibilities. for. coverage in these categories. His

authority to direct and control the subscribing agencies of the’
armed forces will be limited only by such instructions as he

may receive from the Secretary of Defense. He will have authority
to coordinate the intelligence activities of the subscribing
agencies in his area of responsibility, within the limits of
their available personnel and facilities, by the assignment of
missions, the designation of objectives, and.the exercise of

such coordinating control as he deems necessary. He is not
authorized to control the administration or discipline of the
subscribing agencies in the area of his responsibility, nor te
issue instructions to them beyond those necessary for the purposes
stated ahove.- Ss ; _ ;

TI. Personnel of the subscribing agencies in the area of responsi-
bility of the armed forces cemmander will still send reports to

and be under the continued supervision of their respective head-~.
quarters. They will render such aid and assistance to-the armed
forces commander and his designated representatives as are

possible and practicable. They will furnish all pertinent informa-
tion, data, and other material that are or may be necessary or
desirable to the armed forces commander by the most expeditious
means and methods possible consistent with requisite security.

’ Bach headquarters of the subscribing agencies will promptly be
advised by its agencies of all information and data appropriately
identified as having been furnished to the armed forces commander.

DATE.

a” ; we 7 pines _ oe a : ub ot .
~ . ON con iA a
gta THFORMATE FLED
; . CLASSIF

NW 68296 Docld:32989628 Page 208

a rence eee rE a A ET EE ” : -
. . J 7 . . .
et + 1, te . .
ph ke te toes cay er re tat . Sane er oe tone
Pa hg Pe rs Hi ue tye a tye tbe ee! Ma Oe nc te tate a er ment Cinema Ut
- oo. eg fer atlas SS a eS TA Dar FP
. . sof nn . . . . ary . . ‘ge
. . : :

ae a are we Patel. on Wet ete oat

oF “8 ABPENDIX BUT SE Sons eis fees ees

PERIODS OF PREDOMINANT MILITARY ,
INTERESTS, NOT INVOLVinG MARTIAD LAW
1 . ™ a
I. In time of war certain areas will come into prominence as
potential theaters of operation.» When an armed forces commander
-of such a potential theater is designated, he definitely has
interest in, though not control of, the civilian life within the
area. In order that. the armed.forces commander may prepare him-
' self for the discharge of the possible respemsibility which may
affix to him, the following procedure is agreed upon:

> ‘42, Agents of the FBI; of ONI; ID, Army3 and the OSI, Ic,
. U.S. Air Forse will continue to function in accordance with the
provisions of Sections II, III, IV, and V. .

; 2. In addition thereto, the armed forces commander may take

.. steps to analyze the facilities existing and to explore the
_manner in which complete coverage will be obtained if martial law
is declared. Adequate liaison with the other subscribing agencies
will insure that the armed forces commander will have the henerit.
of the experience, judgment and knowledge of the representatives

_3f the other agencies.

3. The armed forces commander is authorized to request and
receive such information from the other three agencies as he may
desire and they may be able to furnish.

XI, The analysis and exploration referred to above will show the
coverage furnished by each of the subscribimg agencies and any

_ additional coverage each subscribing agency can undertake. When
the commander feeis that more complete coverage is required, it
is recognized that he is authorized to augment the coverage with
such elements of the subscribing agencies as are under his
jurisdiction, Prior to any invasion of the spheres normally
coming under the cegnizance of the other subscribing agencies, ;
the armed forces commander should obtain the necessary authority
from the Secretary of Defense. —_

_ XII. Irrespective of the fact that the preceding recommendations
have placed the initiative in the hands of the armed forces
commander, whenever any of the other services feel that such
a survey to determine adequacy of coverage should be undertaken,

it should be so recommended. asf
antl
. AE
_ gomnsson or
-ii- pi Tg wyCLARS
: aoe Helo

j ~ pase

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 209 ~ “

tage Thai teeta RNR ae seg, pniette Sei et. . & En aang’ rep “eset i et
ve Bee I Se i a Se Patecee Eat sang tak See ete ES St

lemental Agreement No. I

erimitarions.. Agreement...

Cooperation and Coordination Between ,

e Federal Bureau or investigatzon :
The Inteitigence Division cr the Arm
’ The OF ieter Saat mteiiiqence and

The Office of Special investigations, Inspector General, U.S. Air Force

.

¢

The Director of Intelligence , U.S. Army, the Director
of the Federai Bureau of Investigation, the Birector of Naval
Intelligence and the Director. of the office ef Special -Investi-~-
gations, Inspecter General, U.S, Air Force, with a view to
promoting the closest possiblé cecperation and coordination
between the Field Services of these agencies agree that the
following recommendations will be transmitted to their field
installations:

(a) Special Agents in Charge of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation Divisional Offices, Military Intelligence Officers
of the pertinent Armies, District Officers of the Office of
Special Investigations, Inspector General, U.S. Air Force, and

Raval Na atm nt Teted licence Of fAcors wa 47 meintain etaan nawnannat
UR VR A le AA en dy Wa ee ee ate A ee ee ae I Rae te

“Liaison between those offices and their representatives, including

a meeting of representatives of the four agencies, preferably the
efficers in charade, at least twice per month, for the purpose of
discussing pending and contémpiated investigative activities, and
any other subject necessary to insure that there is proper co-
ordination of their investigative work.

Cte (b) The clese personal liaison to be maintained
between representatives of the four agencies at all times should
insure that there is not duplication of effort in any field, and

. that a preper coverage of the whole investigative field is main-

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 210

tained. Particular attention should be paid to avoiding any
duplication in connecticn with the use of informers.

(c) A distinction should be recognized between the
investigative interest of individual agencies and the coverage
interest, It is believed that ail four agencies should study,
from time to time, the-coverage of the investigative field in
order to insure that ail channels of interest and avenues of
information are adequately covered by at least one of the partici-
pating agencies. . co - - , ;

(d) Where there is doubt as to whether or not one of the
other agencies is interested in information collected, it should
be transmitted to the other agéncy.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED -

. _ drones
. ~ HEREC 2S WCLAS TELED .
o pared 124 sisbp eel Me


(e) Consideration should be given to the fact*that certain
classes of information are of general interest to the Military,
Naval, and Air Force Intelligence Services in connection with
background and knowledge of espionage and sabotage organizations,
even though the Military, Naval, and Air Force Intelligence
Services may have no apparent direct investigative interest.

- ¢

_ (£) Should differences of opinion of a minor nature
occur, the directors of the four intelligence agencies feel that
with. proper personal.liaison, such differences can be satisfactorily
adjusted locally by the officials in charge of the various divisional
organizations.

. - (Approved by I.I.C. June 2, 1949)

“ak
|


Ltiiy aed oae dE “24S lemental. Agreement: Nos: TIL |

Delimirations. Agrections
s Amended June

é =

. _Investigative Jurisdiction on .
Vessels of ialttary Sea Transportation Service
c-)

1. The investigative jurisdiction of all activities
under the categories of espionage, counterespionage, subversion
and sabotage on vessels of the Military Sea Transportation Service
is'as follows: . . ° .

a. Investigative jurisdiction on vessels purchased
by the Navy will be the responsibility of the Office of Naval
Intelligence. .
b, Vessels obtained by the Navy through a "bare boat

charter" will be under the investigative jurisdiction of the office
' of Naval Intelligence,

c. Vessels allocated to the Military Sea Transportation

Sarvina which are mennad and su perv sod by thoir ovivate cuners
Se VAS Neg ees ceanee we VAEV ee May Urteewa

are under the investigative jurisdiction of the FBI.
3.. When civilian personnel who are subjects of an

investigation under a or b above reach a US. port or a port ~
where the FBI has a field agency, cr prior to reaching shen “port,

_ aif practicable, the Department of the Navy will promptly furnish.
the -FBI ail pertinent information concerning the investigation.
If personnel who are subjects of an investigation as above remove
themselves from the vessel upon arrival of the vessel in port and . ~
further surveillance is considered necessary, the Navy will

. continue surveiliance until notified by the FBI at local level
that the FBI will make every effort to transfer responsibility
upon arrival of the vessel at the port.

3. When the FBI opens an investigation under c above
or when an FBI investigation in progress develops or is Believed
about to develop ramifications under a, b or c above, the FBI ©
Will promptly furnish all pertinent information to the Navy and
will thereafter coordinate its actions with: ‘the-Navy whenever and
wherever deemed necessary to insure proper pursuit of the case,

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 212 < ‘


NW 85296 Docid:32989628 Page #13

ippisnentak? Aqvedment ROA TV. Bites oes te
the Delimitations Agreement _

Investigation of Private Contractors
. . or ihe Armed Forces
. ww rm were

It is agreed by the subscribers of the Delimitations
Agreement (hereinafter referred to as subscribers) that with
reference investigations of civilian employees, applicants for
employment, directers and key personnel of privately owned plants
and facilities, working or bidding én contracts important’ to the
Army, Navy or Air Force (hereinafter referred to as the Armed
Forces) procurement, the folicwing will be followed insofar as
practicable. Exceptions thereto will be adjusted by mutual -
agreement between the subscribers concerned, .

- a. The Armed Forces will conduct background
-investigations of such persens unless there is a particular reason
for requesting that an investigatien be conducted by the FBI or
the FBI has a special interest in a particular case and has
notified the Armed Forces of such interest.

b. The FBI will conduct cemplaint investigations

of such personnel upen specific requast in each case by one or

more of the Aymod Forces, If ene of ihe Armed Forces has no

. further need for an investigation requested, but not completed,
prompt notification will be made te the FBI.

_¢ c. Investigations conducted by the Armed Forces
under a above will be terminated and all information passed to
the FBI when credible derogatery infermation of a loyalty nature
is uncovered, Upon receipt of such a case, the PBI will proceed
as under b above if one of the Armed Forces se requests.

d. When one of the subscribers is aware that
another is conducting an investigation on a person or firm
identical or closely connected with a person or firm it
contemplates investigating, no investigation will be under-~
taken without the consent ef the subscriber which has an investi-
gation in progress. The investigating agency will make available
_to the other interested agency copies of the reports of the
investigation made. .

e. Normally, identity of confidential informants
Will not be communicated from one subscriber to another; however,
When such communication occurs, the receiving subscriber will
employ the highest pessible safeguards to insure that such informants
are not compromised. No transmittal of information concerning
confidential informants to a third subscriber or to another agency
is authorized except by specific consent of the originator.

f. A subscriber who receives a report of investi-
gation from another subscriber may freely transmit copies of such
reports to a third subscriber except as provided in e above.

g. A report of complete investigation received
by the Armed Forces from the FRI. will not.be reopened without the
approval of the FBI except ‘to obtain additional background informa-
tion. In such case, the FBI wiil be furnished copies of ali
. information obtained. Other information required by the Armed

Forces will be requested of the FBI%

h. If one of the Armed Forces requests the FBI
to conduct an investigation or to conduct additional investigation
as provided under g above, and if for any reason the FBI declines
or is unable to conduct such investigation or additional investi- |
gation, the Armed Force concerned may proceed with the investi-
gation, The FBI will be furnished copies of the results thereof
if the FBI so requests or if the Armed Force concerned considers
the results to be of FBI interest. ae

i, Nothing above is te be construed as altering
the basic Delimitations Agreement of 1949 or current agreements
concerning subversive organizations. ; ;

(Approved by I.I.C. June 2, 1949)

= 2 ww

ree ASB SAO Gable c589 6.28. Ba Gnd dens


9 * of

-~ ° t,he ~

. : eM os
‘. Mand oo tee PCa ae OP Bie Tic
a tp Be dee el Se ae . aes

" "Supplemental Aqreement Nov Wo" 8 CU ens
' to Fie Delimitations Agreement . ,

é

7 Investigation of Reserve and Civilian
; 7 Compongnts or the Armed Services

: ' Jt is agreed by the subscribers to the Delimitations
Agreement that the Army, the Navy and the Air Force may conduct
background investigations on members of the imactive reserve
and Rational Guard who are anticipated being called back to .
active duty, or where an investigation is undertaken for the
purpose of determining whether the individual should be disenroiled
fron his military status, or to determine whether the individual
may be granted access to classified military information. The

. following precedures shall.be pursued in each of the above

_ circumstances:

(1) The Intelligence agencies of the Army, Navy or
- Air Force before undertaking such background
investigation will consult the FBI to
_ determines (a) if the FRI Bas an investication
"ain progress; if so, no investigation will
be undertaken by the intelligence agencies:
except as-may be mutually agreeable to the-
Armed Force concerned and the FRY; (b} if
. the FBI already has made an investigation;
mo if so, the results will be made available to
Co the other agencies; (c) if the FBI has
pe . information on the individual, even though
Vo. . it may not have conducted am investigation.

(2) If, after consulting the FBI, investigation is.
- undertaken by the other agemcies, it will be
pursued no further than is mecessary to make
the determination required by the other agencies,
and all information developed pertinent to-the |
four categories will be furmished promptly to
e FBI.

oe oo (Approved by I.I.C. June 2, 1949)

wee

__ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 215

“ty

Supplemental Aareement No. VI
. Fo Pes pelimitations Aareement
ERED | Sine nenEEEnEeeeennnneninnnnnieimnennattminnaieneeneme”d

Investigation in Areas Not specifically Assigned
¢ :

. It is agreed by the military subscribers to the

’ Delimitations Agreement that the references therein in
paragraphs III. 4., IV. 4., and V. 4. to "areas where the
Army. (Navy, Air Force) Commander has supreme jurisdiction
over the armed forces stationed therein" shall be interpreted
as referring to areas where the Department of, the A
(Navy, Air Force) is responsible for the: administrative and
logistic support of the Headquarters of Commands established
by the Secretary of Defense.

_ (Approved by I.I.C. November 4, 1959)

NW 85296 Dochd:329559628 Page 216


3

een peer ranns nner 7
eae Roe domaaepeemncun one oo

amore i773

CLASSIFIED BY SE

. -MAALS8296 Docld:32989628 Page 217

BRAG Com 2AD OC Fev eat Oa
oan a

OP Re
rat N «

OTe,

SS  Pepruary 7, 1966

tery Cs WASHLNGTON, D.C, 20535

“"". 3} GENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY .
“Vso, £) OPERATIONS IN Did UNITED STATES

a) CIA. will not initiate an investigation of any
“foreign official in the United States without the concurren
and coordination of the FBI. In this context, the term
"Znvestigation" means systematic and, ‘diyect inquiries or

“= proceduros (such @s physical or technical surveillances
or neighborhood inquiries) aiming at developing information

“t.r, concerning an individual's activities or background;

"investigation". does not include the acedptance' or the

“-normally mage by CIA agents in discharging ~ their cover
functions (3) Ce fer. -

ae (2) cra: “wilh senk concur rence and’ ‘coordination of

‘ the FBI before approaching for recruitment any foreig
official or communist-bloc visitor in the United States,
“Phe FBI will concur and ‘toordinate if the proposed action
does not conflict: with any operation, current or planned,

Sng Nang aotive investigation of the ¥BI.(5), .

(3) CIA will “advise ‘the: FBI prior to any planned
meeting between a CIA asset’ and ‘a foreign official or
conmunist-~bloc visitor of known or presumed interest to
“the FBI (this would include all communist-—bloc officials
and visitors) for purposes of assessment and Social
developnent.(S ). ae | a “ 8

(4)... Clandestine CIA staff opera tive domestic:
American agents of CIA, and foreign agents ’ of CIA recrui
abroad who come to the’ United States wiil be identified
the FBI by name or appropriate description depending on
the. national security interest involved, (Ss) .

* as

. <5) Pursuant to pa aragraph 4 ‘above, when a CIA agent

arrives in. the United States for a visit or for an(S)

=

te
ve
ts
vo

ete eRe. GROUP 1 re
ee at “Exelud from automatic “ .
: tee . a _ _ down oe gr ing ‘and .
eg Ste “ Geotas jWication

fore)
:
}

development of information through social. contacts or contaccs

yO 7 = oar
7 , oy , aaa
” 4 ‘f . , ‘ ? ; t ‘ye ~
“ . aoa "GF eo . tre
ve eS 24 . : ‘®
. ON Coe Ss Co ner a °
oF a i ae nn ECRET oo poet . -
a a # _ _ wo foots . : a ; ed _ ° .
a, - = ., ato. a . . . or
; . aa ne mle, _ se) UE
entra] Intelligence Agency . oe ee -.
: Operations in the United States Sat tO
will confer regarding the handling of the agent in the
United States, It is recognized that each case will have

its individual peculiarities, The governing principlé will "-

“be. positive, intelligence interest as weighed_agsins’ — +
; intcrnal Security factors, CIA will continue its ;

- (2 -6iitractual relationship for the purpose of handling oa a

”. the training, the procurehkent of positive foreign + :

Po ~> Sntelligence, the fulfillment of CIA commitments to sO
reo. 6.7 the agent, and the prepa tion of the" agent for his --.0 lo cco.
* wo. mext assigns ment abroad, (5)

i
}

{

if

: _ assignment, the Bureau will be advised and the two agenciés
3

|

iy

|

i

t

a
* tee

~ Ve an a . . - 2 Le

. - (6) In those cases where CIA will be “handling. its.
. “agent in the United States, CIA will service FBI security
‘or countcrintelligence requirenents and Will provide the
FBI all avent information bearing on counterintelligence
or internal security matters, ineluding the- scope and
nature of the agent's accéss to information and the
at identities of the agentts Significant contacts, particularly
ain the communist-~bloc field, In such cases where CIA
serviciff® has bééh Ihadequate to FBI internal. Security . .
interests, the- FBI. ie have direct access to the agent, (5)


sens punt

genet
pare

INVESTIGATIVE GUIDELINES
TITLE XI, ORGANIZED CRIME CONTROL ACT OF 1970 ~~.
REGULATION OF EXPLOSIVES

}. General

Title XI of the captioned law amends Title 18, United
States Code, by adding a new chapter 40 with section numbers 841
through 848 coverning the importation, manufacture, distribution
and storage of explosive materials and creating cartain Federal
offenses pertaining to the unlawful use of explosives. Administration
of explosives regulation is vested in the Secretary of the Treasury
as is investigative jurisdiction over the unlawful acts proscribed
in section 842. Under authority contained in section 846 the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) have concurrent investigative jurisdic-
tion as to the remainder of chapter 40, ji.e., the unlawful acts
proscribed in subsections (d), (e), (f), (a), (h) and (4) of saction
844, Although not speci fied in chapter 40, the Postal Jnspection

Pacedan alatt bd
-WEYVICG Saas have gur ricttrreretyne ue tives iiuabe art: HG tden Ls

involving explosive or incendiary devices sent through the malis
or directed against U.S. Postal Service property. -

Title XI greatly broadens Fetieral- authority pertaining te
explosives-connectad offenses. At the same tine, Congress has
expressly disclaimed any intent to occupy the field to the exclusion
of state jaw on the same subject matter. To effect both .Congressional
purposes and to prevent unnecassary duplication of effort it is
essential that the limited Federal investigative resources be carefully
allocated, particularly in cases in which both the ATF and the FBI
have jurisdiction.

2. Federal Bureau of Investigation (F21} Jurisdiction in General

(a) Effect on prior jurisdiction - This agreement applies
only to those incidents as to which the FBI had no investigative
jurisdiction prior to the enactment of the captioned law and to
incidents previously subject to FBI invastigation by reason of chapter
65, Title 18, United States Code (malicious mischief). Investigative
procedures in other types of incidents (e.g., train wrecking, damaging
aircraft and motor vehicles, racketeering) shall remain unchanged.

o>
pails oe
ox commen . 4° . .
spe used a _™ ~ °

NW 68296 Docid: 32985028 Page 219

-~2- ‘

{b) Primary jurisdiction - Subject to the provisions
hereof, the FBI will exercise primary jurisdiction over al} alleced
violations of section 844 which are directed at foreian diplomatic
facilities or at activities, such as transportation and tourist
offices, operating under the aegis of a foreign government although
not in a diplomatic status, over al? alleged violations of subsections
844(d) through (i) which are perpetrated by terrorist/revolutionary
groups or individuals and all other violations of subsections 644{a)
through (g) which are not directed at Treasury Department or Postal
Service buildings or functions.

(c) Type of Investigation to be Coriducted

(1) Offenses pervetrated by terrerist/revolutionary
groups or individuals - The FBI will immediately initiate a full
investigation of all alleged violations of section 844 which appear
at the outset to have been perpetrated by terrorist/revolutionary
yioups oF TWaTviduals a3 defined tn advance by the Internal fccurity
Division of the Department of Justice. If ATF or the Postal
Inspection Service has properly initiated investigations and infor~
mation is subsequently developed indicating apparent involvement of
terrorist/revolutionary groups er Hurviduais, responsibility shall
be relinquished to the FBI unless a determination is made by the
Department of Justice that a transfer of responsibilities will
_” unduly tmpair further investigative efforts.

(2) Alleged offenses against Colleges and Universities -
The FBI will immediately initiate a fu nvestigation of any alieced
violation of section 844 which involves the use or attempted use of
explosive (as distinguished from incendiary) materials against the
facilities of a college or university. Investigation of alleged viola-
tions involving use or attempted use of incendiary materials will be
limited initially to the development of backaround information as
prescribed in paragraph 6 below.

(3) Allesed offenses directed against foreign
diplomatic facilities and related activities - The FSI will immediately
initiate a full investigation of all alleged violations of section 844
which are directed at foreign diplomatic facilities and related
activities as described in paragraph 2(b) above.

NW 85296 Docid:32989628 Page 770

ety

-~3-

e

. (4) All other alleqed viclations of subsection

844(f) ~- offenses involving use of explosives against United
States property or federally financed orcanizations, and (¢) ~-
offenses involving possession of explosives in buildings owned,
leased, used, etc., by the United States ~ The FBI will immediately
initiate a full investigation of al? violations of subsection 844(q)
over which it has primary jurisdiction hereunder, and those violations
of 844(f) which are directed at federal property (e.g., a military
facility) or a federal function (e.9., a Selective Service or ROTC
facility). In other violations of 844(f) the FBI will develop and
disseminate background information as indicated in paragraph 6 below.

a

3. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division (ATF) Jurisdic-
tion in General

(a) Violations ancillary to firearms laws violations or
violation of section 842 - The Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division
{ATF) Of the Department of the Treasury will exercise investigative
jurisdiction over violations of section 844 which area ancillary to its
primary jurisdiction over the Federal firearms laws or over section
42 of Title XI.

(b) Violations of subsection 844(d) - interstate transporta-
tion of explosives with unlawful Tntent and subsection O44(7) - —
offenses against property used in or affectina commerce - Subject to
paragrapn 2b, above, the ATF will exercise primary investigative
jurisdiction over violations of subsection 844(d) and (i} and wil}
conduct a full investigation thereof unless notified by the Criminal
Division that pursuant to paragraph 2(c)(1}, above, the Department of
Justice has requested FBI investication in a particular matter.

(c) Violations directed at Treasury Department property or
functions - The ATF shall have primary jurisdiction to investigate all
violations of section 844 which are directed at Treasury Department

property or functions and will conduct a full investigation of such
violations. ; oe . .

NW60296 Docld:32989628 Page 221

~4-

4.. Postal Inspection Service Jurisdiction

The Postal Inspection Service shall have primary juris-
diction to investigate all violations of section 844 which are
directed at U.S. Postal Service property or functions.

5. Special Considerations
(a) Bomb Threats, false information (section 844(e)) -

The ATF and the Postal Inspection Service shall have jurisdiction
over violations of section 844{e) against Treasury Department or
Postal Service property or functions, respectively. The FBI shall
have jurisdiction over all other violations of section 844{e). Upon
receipt of information alleging or suggesting a violation of subsection
844(e), the investiaative agency concerned wil] review available
information to determine whether the identity of the offender is

known or can be readily ascertained and, if not, whether the evidence
suggests a pattern or plan of such offenses by a particular offenucr
or against a particular victim. If such a pattern appears or if the
offender is identified, all available information will be disseminated
as indicated in paragraph 6 below. ;

(b) Use/carrying explosive in commission of a felony
{section 844(h)) - Violations of 844(h) should be handfed as an
adjunct of the felony from which they arise and should be discussed
with the appropriate United States Attorney or Division of the
Department handling prosecution of the underlying felony offense.
The agency having jurisdiction ever the underlying felony will have
investigative jurisdiction over the 844(h) violation (e.g., bank
robbery is under FBI jurisdiction).

(c) Violations of 26 U.S.C. 5861 (destructive devices) -
In incidents invoTving alleged violations of 18 U.S.¢v 844 (which
may also involve a violation of 26 U.S.C. 5861), ATF shall not
exercise its primary jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. 5861 involving
dastructive devices, but the incident shall be treated in accordance.
with the provisions of these guidelines. This is In no way a
relingutsnment by ATF of its investigative jurisdiction under Title
II of the Gun Control Act of 1968.

NW 85296 Docid:32989628 Page #22

~5-

6. Development of Background Information

Some incidents such as those directed against Federal
property or functions (paragraph 2(b) above) require immediate full
federal investigation. Others require a more circumspect approach
and will result in full Federal investigation only after considera-
tion ef factors pertinent to the exercise of Federal jurisdiction.
Accordinaly, in these incidents which these guidelines do not prescribe
immediate full investigation, the investigative agency having juris-
diction will develon background information which includes (a) facts
bearing on motivation such as involvement of the suspected perpetrators
in terrorist/revolutionary activities, organized crime, labor-management
disputes, or ractal-religious hate activities; (b) the applicability
of state and local Taws and likelihood of state or local investigative
and prosecutive actions; and (c) any other available facts indicating
whether or not the offense warrants Federal investigation and proseacu-
tion. Such background information will be submitted telephonically
(202-739-2745) or by teletype (719-822-0008) to the General Crimes
Section af the Criminal Division and to the acpronriate United States
Attorney. The Criminal Division will advise the investigative agency
concerned whether the matter warrants submission to any other
Division ar Section of the Criminal Division, and when so warranted
the Criminal Division will transw#it the information to such other
Division or Section.

7. Full Investigation

A full investigation will be initiated immediately in
those instances wherein such investigation is specified herein. In
other Instances full investigation will be initiated only uoon direc-
tion of the Department of Justice after consideration by the Division
having cognizance over the matter of the background information
developed under paragraph 6 above.

8. Reports , :

Copies of case reports prepared in matters investigated under
these guidelines will be furnished directly to the Department of dustice
and the appropriate United States Attorney. All investigative agencies

ca

NW 88296 Docid:327989628 Page 223

-6-

shal] submit initial reports as soon as practicable to the Department
of Justice and shal? submit progress reports once each 30 days or

as scon thereafter as possible. The Criminal Division of the
Department of Justice will be informed as soon as possible in each
instanca wherein an Investigative acency initiates an investigation
under section 844, Such notification is of critical importance to
the avoidance of duplication of investigative activities. Also sach
agency subscribing to these guidelines shall, upon instituting inves-
tigation resarding possible violations of section 844, immediately
notify other subscribing agencies having a Togical interest therein.
Also, a sufficient level of follow-up liaison and dissemination shall
be maintained to avoid duplication of investigative effort.

Additionally, each such agency will exchange information
on a timely basis and in a manner which will not interfere with
ongoing investigations relative to types, seurces, movement, and
storage of explosives which are the subject of its investigations.
Information regarding significant developments in investigations
being conducted under these guidelines and information of an intel li~

» ay at
pence natura deyalanad incidental tro tmenet Stantions which is-sof logical

; interest to the Department of Justice shall be furnished promptly to
“the Criminal Division of that Department which will be responsible
for any necessary further ‘dissemination within that Department.

9. Review of Guidelines .-

These guidelines shal? be reviewad on a continuing basis by

_ the parties hereto to determine whether problems exist in their adinin-

istration which should be alleviated or whether modification of any of
the terms of the agreement are needed in the interests of better law

enforcement.
10. Summary
Section " Type Violation Primary Jurisdiction
842 Regulatory provision viola- ‘ ATF

tions “
844(d) Interstate transportation ATF

(except by mail) of explosives
with unlawful intent

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 224

Section

844(e)

844 (Ff)

844(g)

844(h)

NW 88296 Dochd:329699028 Page #25

_ Type Violation

Bomb threats ~ false infor-
mation ~ Treasury buildings
or functions

U.S. Postal Service buildings
or functions

Other
Offenses against property of

the United States or federally
financed organizations --~

Tranerioms: herd dines an funatiane
ae uemowey wwwns easy owe Ore ee re
U.S. Postal Service buildings

Other (including colleges and
universities)

Possession of explosives in
buildings owned, leased, used
by the United States --

Treasury buildings or functions

U.S. Postal Service buildings
or functions

Other

Use/carrying explosives in
commission of a felony

Primary Jurisdiction

ATF

U.S. Postal
Inspection Service

FBI

U.S. Postal
inspection Service

FBI

ATF

U.S. Postal
Inspection Service

FBI
Agency having juris-

diction over underlying
felony

Section

844i)

All Sections

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 226

Type Violation

Offenses against property
used in or affecting commerce

All offenses perpetrated by
terrorist/revolutionary groups
or individuals

Primary Jurisdiction

ATF

FBL - Unless another
agency has started
investigation before
receipt of information
indicating terrorist/ .
revolutionary involvement.
In this evant see para-
graph 2c(1} above.


’

Reena od emcee 6 Mee eee ete ee ll oa
i
©

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND THE UNITED STATES
** SECRET SERVICE CONCERNING PROTECTIVE RESPONSIBILITIES

“AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND THE UNITED STATES
SECRET SERVICE CONCERNING PROTECTIVE RESPONSIBILITIES

["L. Purpose of Agreement

"The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) originates, and receives from
other sources, large numbers of reports on individuals and organizations.
One purpose of this agreement is to define that portion of the information
on file with, or received or originated by, the FBI, which the United States

Secret Service (USSS) desires to receive in connection with its protective
responsibilities.

"The USSS has statutory authority to protect, or to engage in certain
activities to protect, the President and certain other persoris. (Certain
other persons, as used in this agreement, refers to those persons protected
by the Secret Service under Title 18, U. S. Code, Section 3056.) The
authority of the USSS to protect the President or certain other persons is

‘ construed to authorize it to investigate organizations or individuals and to
interview individuals who might constitute a threat to the President or cer-
tain other persons. The FBI has statutory authority to investigate assault,

\ killing or kidnaping and attempts or conspiracies to kill or kidnap the
President and other designated individuals.

Nase,

.matiou wuich vy its nature reveals a definite or possible threat to the
, safety of the President and certain other persons.

"A second purpose of this agreement is to iasure the most effective pro~
~~ tection for the Presideut and certain other persons by establishing a clear
division of responsibility between the FBI and the USSS. Such division

will also avoid compromising investigations or sources and needless duplica-
tion of effort.

"II. General Responsibilities

Oe ee ery

; "The USSS is charged by Title 18, U. S. Code, Section 3056, with the
| responsibility of protecting the person of the President of the United
_, States, the members of his immediate family, the President-elect, the Vice
“* President or other officer in the order of succession to the office of
' President, and the Vice President-elect; protecting the person of a former
‘President and his wife during his lifetime and the person of a widow of a
former President until her death or remarriage, and minor children of a former

protecting persons who are determined from time to time by the Secretary
of the Treasury, after consultation with the Advisory Committee, as being
‘Major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates who should receive such
‘ protection (unless the candidate has declined such protection); protecting
, the person of a*visiting head of a foreign state or foreign government
. and, at the direction of the President, other distinguished foreign visitors
to the United States and official representatives of the United States
/ performing special missions abroad (unless such persons decline protection).«

a
° gentle
eros
iectage ee pact
rN RAW ba " jeol™

a re een me ea -
ay ene wart + mee me pe ee cue

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 227

President until they reach 16 years of age, unless such protection is declined; ~

F
Hf
¥
2
i
§
3
:
$


~« ¢

we : . : . oot _ o . | - . we . “ , @ wee a ae ; - k

"The Executive Protective Service, under the control of the Director,

USSS, is charged’ by Title 3, U. S. Code, Section 202, with protection of
the Executive Mansion and grounds in the District of Columbia; any building
in which Presidential offices are located; foreign diplomatic missions
located in the metropolitan area of the District of Columbia; and foreign
diplomatic missions located in such other areas in the United States, its
territories and possessions, as the President, on a case-by-case basis,

may direct.

"The FBI is charged under Title 18, U. S. Code, Section 1751, with investiga~
tive jurisdiction over the assault, killing or kidnaping, and attempts or
conspiracies to assault, kill or kidnap the President of the United States
and other designated individuals.

"The FBI has responsibility for Federal investigations of all violations
of Title 18, U. S. Code, Sections 112, 970, 1116~1117 and 1201, relating
to the 'Act for the Protection of Foreign Officials and Official Guests
in the United States.!

"The FBI has investigative jurisdiction over violations of a wide range of
the criminal statutes of the United States including primary jurisdiction
over matters affecting the internal security of the United States.

"TIT. Exchange of Information and Coordination of Responsibilities

I

‘The USSS undertakes to identify individuals or groups who because of their i

propensities or characteristics, may be dangerous to the President of the f
United States and certain other persons. To assist the USSS in identifying Ean

such individuals and groups the FBI agrees to furnish to the USSS, information
Cuties tivai public suurce information or information originating with otner

U. S. agencies) from its files or which may come to its attention which by

its nature reveals a danger or possible danger to the President or certain
other persons, or which can be constrtied as falling within the categories of
information desired-by the USSS as set forth in Section IV of this agreement.

"The FBI will inform the USSS of the identity of individuals or organizations fe
who come to the attention of the FBI as knowingly and willfully advocating, ae
abetting, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, or propriety of over- ,
throwing or destroying the Government of the United States, or the Govern-
ment of any state, territory, or possession, or political subdivision
therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of ,
any such government The PBI will furnish the USSS with reports on such .
individuals or organizations as requested. During investigation by the FBI
of such individuals or organizations, the FBI will be alert and promptly
notify the USSS of any information indicating a possible piot against the
person of the President and certain other persons. :

eo mm

"The USSS agrees that it will conduct no investigation of individuals or
groups identified or suspected of being threats to the internal security of
the United States without notifying the FBI. However, when time for

oka pe aepenntnticinitsatiane ait gat we matmEns AA ee

TO ne tener eerenen pny nea ptr a nye Hert eran ie een peerteEe eS! inne MRE eT ver a

NW 88296 Docid:327989628 Page 228

as

ss <2 é

owe - BE een ame Ree - eS neta Sere ind

an - , : t
. “ Ct, @ : J & @ . i
oe _ . . 7 y whee Lat é . So. i. °
. consultation is not available, and an indication of immediate danger
exists, the USSS may take such action as is necessary with respect to carry-
ing out its protective responsibilities. Any information obtained by the
USSS during such action will be furnished to the FBI as expeditiously as
possible. p |

"The FBI will not conduct investigation of individuals or groups solely .
for the purpose of establishing whether they constitute a threat to the .
safety of the President and certain other persons unless there is an indica-
tion of a violation of Title 18, U. S. Code, Section 1751, or other

statute over which the FBI has jurisdiction.

"It will be the responsibility of the FBI to advise the USSS when investiga-
tion is being initiated under Title 18, U. S. Code, Section 1751 and there-
after to furnish the USSS with copies of the FBI investigative reports as
they are prepared. It will be the responsibility of the USSS to furnish

the FBI any information in its possession or which may come to its attention
which reasonably indicates that a violation of Title 18, _U- S. Code,

Section 1751, has been or is being committed.

"The USSS also agrees to furnish the FBI any information in its possession
or which may come to its attention indicating a violation of any other
statutes over which the FBI has investigative jurisdiction.

oor ronson eae oer

"The FBI, under its responsibility for investigation of violations of $
Title 18, U. S. Code, Sections 112, 970, 1116-1117, 1201 and 1751 will take
cognizance of the protective responsibilities of the Treasury Department

under Title 3, U. Ss Code , Section 202 and Title 18, U. S. Code, Section 3056 tara

Stee nf 4 os ae
aud Lius GoeS Wot Limit oz intcrferc with the authori vy Sa UMS £3 = IF of

the Treasury in the discharge of his statutory protective responsibilities.
This is not to be construed as vesting concurrent investigative jurisdiction
with the Treasury Department with respect to investigations of individuals

or organizations engaged in activities affecting the national security incliud-
ing terrorism, treascn, sabotage, espionage, colinter-espionage, rebellion or
insurrection, sedition, seditious conspiracy, neutrality matters, Foreign
Agents Registration Act, or any other Statute or Executive Order relating to
national security. Any investigations of such groups or individuals for

any reasons other than in connection with protective responsibilities

must be closely coordinated with and have the concurrence of the FBI in

order to minimize interference with national security responsibilities of

the FBI. i-

"IV. Information to be Furnished to the United States Secret Service b
the Federal Bureau of Investigation :

"A. When an individual or group is referred by the FBI to the USSS,
. the following information will be furnished to the extent
available:

eres OT errr tre srr aaa

Aone

Beer Nareme. coed eceeene tn erent ore

.
erred

~ ~ ~ nie vee ~ wos meme a ne ae |
“NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 229 é

en en, Ea — rate nh Eten ete Aen ne nr

; Identification data inciudind@ine or names,

| addresses, photograph (or statement as to availability of

x . such), physical description, date and place of birth, employment,
and marital status.

“Organization ~ Name or names, address or addresses, officers,
SiZé, Purpose or goals of organization, source of financial support,
background data and such other relevant information as may be
available. °

"Reason for Referral - Statement of the class or classes of
information described in Section IV B under which the individual
Or organization belongs.

‘Information in FBI Files - A summary, as appropriate, of per~
tinent portions of any FBI file on an individual or organization
referred.

, "PBI Identification Records ~ The USSS will make specific requests
in each instance where a check of the FBI identification records
is desired. :

"Be. Types of information to be’ referred:

"1. Information concerning attempts, threats, or conspiracies
to injure, kill, or kidnap persons protected by the USSS
or other U. S. or foreign officials in the U. S. or abroad.

. "2. Information concerning attempts or threats to redress a

' grievance against any public official by other than iegal

, " means, or attempts’ personally to contact such ofricaais for
that purposee

"3. Information concerning threatening, irrational, or abusive
written or oral statements about U. S. Government or foreign
officials.

emanate tT SE ATSNEYIn PWIA LLNS "HUN enn - hah Nas FOSSA TN ARR EIEIO DUDLEY EDO CRED E PLS A LRA IOS TALS HONEY REALE WIS LMM ATE LIN! EOE OLEATE MEOH EAT

"4. Information concerning civil disturbances, anti-U. S.
, demonstrations or incidents or demonstrations against foreign
diplomatic establishments. .

Pees etn stent ry

"5. Information concerning illegal bombings or bomb-making;
concealment of caches of firearms, explosives, or other
implements of war; or other terrorist activity.

"6. Information concerning persons who defect or indicate a
desire to defect from the United States and who demonstrate
one or more of the following characteristics:

ae Irrational or suicidal behavior or other emotional
instabitity.

be Strong or violent anti-U. S. sentiment.

a ete oe

ce A propensity toward violence.

fae Ne atten

ren eeeny wNeratarem eg tercceimtam— e¢-memento maee amecesemie wee (TE Oy nie mata pe meNpHMeye oe gh pee eee leer oe
‘ -

ot - “ |

_ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 230 ‘ :

“NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 231

e

id

ee Ee tt te ee ee ee ee Fk eee : pe me een Se

"7, Information concerning persons who may be considered poten-
tially dangerous to individuals protected by the USSS
because of their background or activities, including evidence
of emotional instability or participation in groups eng gaging
in activities inimical to the United States.

"V. Provision of Federal Bureau of Investigation Personnel to Protect
the President and Other Protected Persons

"The USSS may, in accordance with Title 18, U. S.» Code, Section 3056
request FBI Agents be detailed to the USSS in order to augment the capacity
of the USSS to perform its protective duties. Such requests should be
addressed to the Director of the FBI.

NFEBI Agents detailed to the USSS are under the direction and exclusive
operational control of the Director of the USSS for the period of their
assignment. The PBI Agents so detailed may perform an armed or other
protective function.

"VI. Implementation of Agreement

"In order to ettect the-pest possible security of the President ami ceriain
other persons and places whose protection is the responsibility of the USSS,
the FBI and the USSS will construe the terms of this agreement liberally
and will take such steps aS are necessary to insure the proper exchange and
coordination of information.

"The agreement shall be reviewed annually by representatives of the FBI

and the USSS, or at such other times as the FBI or the USSS may request, to
insure that the agreement is both practical and productive. Revisions may
be made on the authority of the Director of the FBI and the Director

of the USSS.

"This agreement supersedes all prior agreements between the FBI and the
USSS.

—suly 16, 1973) BY /s/ Clarence Me. Kelley
Date Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation

i
}
7
i
i

‘
;
é

—sily 30, 1973 BY_/s/ James J. Rowley
Date . Director
United States Secret Service" :
See a nr eran mm mer 2 a | 4
. elias Taree an _ . 4 a ry : .”
+ . a { ;
‘ * & e we ,

~- * ™ ‘


Ty

x er or\e

ALT, THPORMATIOS
, oo, weRDe al se atte
| A psa t/Le April 9, 1975
| REC:
7 C106 me, 6 BY LIAISON
“: pag Mea? 5 ON
- , I-Mr. Mintz
, ~Mr. ¥ 11
, Urs. Jeanne V7. Davis ce Ceouar
Stats Secretary . l-Mr. Flemister [ } Ba
: National Security Council l-Mr. Rachner (Teel

: 2 aY ASOMetter dated November 8, 1950, from

Assoc. Di rea

Dep. AD Adm,
Dep. AD Inv. |
Asst. Dir.:

Admin,
Comp. Syst. a
Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.
Gen. Inv.
Ident.

Inspection yf: 2

Oe LER? ily
Loborotery ____. z
Plon. & Eval.

Intell.

Spec. Inv.
Training

Legal Coun,

Telephone Rm.

: awa

' Old Executive Office Building
| Washington, D. ©, “ly

Cae
Dear lirs. Davis: “

po In connection vith a request of the Senate Select
Committce on Intelligence Activities, it is requested that
the folioving documents, which vere originated or received
by representatives of the National Security Council, be
eleared for transmittal to the Senate Select Committee:

Henorandum dated November 6G, 1950, fron ;

3, Patrick Coyne, National Socurity Council
Representative on Internal Security, to

ig. J. Edgar Hoover, Chairman, Interdepartnental
Intelligence Conference, and Er. RBaynond PB.
Vhearty, Chairman, Interdepartmental Committee
on Internal Security

i. J. Edgar Hoover, Chairman, Interdepartmental
Intelligence Conference, to Mr. J. Patrick Coyne,
National Security Council, which encloses a
report captioned “Report by the Interdepartnontal
fntelligence Gonference to the National Security
I _. ouneil Regardins the Recent Gutbreak of Violence
; by Puerto Rican Nationalists"

Letter dated July 25, 1961, from Mr. J. Edgar Hoover,
Chairnan, Interdepartrental Intelligence Conzerance,

ate ty,

a soc ee
een SEH NOME PAGE “aWO.

aio

. BCR:he :

"Dy nce

3%
3

Gur

ELETYPE UNIT (__] . {
ms 282 . el

;


|
Mra. Jeanne W. Davis |
Staff Secretary

National Security Council

to Honorable MeGeorge Bundy, Special Assistant

to the President for National Security Affairs,

which encloses a memorandum concerning .
United States imternal security programe |
under the control of the Interdepartmental

Intelligence Committee

Inasmuch as the Senate Seleet Committee requested
the above documents by close of business April 7, 1975, ~nd
your prompt attention to this matter would be appreciated.

Sincerely yours,

—_ Clarence M. Kelley
Director

NOTE:

In view of the urgency of the Senate Select
Committee request, the above documents were hand carried to
the NSC Staff on 4/4/75, by Liaison Agent B. C, Rachner.
This letter constitutes a formal request which as in the past
has been requested by the National Security Council Staff.

} NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 233

grok lO b-

ALD THPORMATION CONTAINED

"he
TT LLL. ier st April 7, 1975

c ee i

Mr. Wannally®/ Se ody - 7s

The statement in the attached of pektiied Agency
xrule is accurate and does not present legal problems. _

As an observati aragraph number 7 of the
document titled "Handling o&Third Agency Matters in Response to
Congressional Select | Committee!" dated March 28, 1975, (attached)
appears to be subject to Various interpretations. This paragraph and
in particular the second sentence of the paragraph appears to allow the
-agency receiving the Committee's request to respond in instances where
a Third Agency is indirectly involved and thé material is sensitive with- | -
out first contacting the Third Agency. Any notification of the Third
Agency in this instance of the furnishing of such information to the
Committee would be after the fact. The term indirectly is not defined.
Additionally, this paragraph allows the Agency receiving the Committee's
request to respond in instances where a Third Agency is directly involved
and the material is nonsensitive without checking with the Third Agency
involved. It would appear the language in paragraph number 7 should

be tightened up and the appropriate terms defined. )
REC. 106 4 be: 7 = b¥
é
qs 98008, Legal Counsel Division 6 APR 15 1975 |
aN
3m Enclosure ee

Ane / OR
Alécveé wns BRELGAT re Qt [/

Tan gb? ud ae Ton. “ befita wrt, a b 2

| MGs

(re Ow foseac€ be ere, a,

PAYEE R POLY pe Beet? ned Pet .

Bat" CRE RUETH ED BQ York) PODMESS THC gene Sos 4
0 ELS GOCE. BEI? FUCE PR FE

PVD: dkg (4)

ele

he

q

/ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 234


¥q
é. DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTON, D. C, 20505

. . 28 March 1975 gmorl®
bo rp AATICHT CONTAIN
. . BL TATTCS ED

. >,
MEMORANDUM FOR: USIB Ad HocGroup DO

SUBJECT: Handling of Third Agency |Matters in Response
, to Congressional Select Committees

1. As you are aware, Senator Church already has submitted re
to me a long list of materials which he requests be provided to his
Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with
Respect to Intelligence Activities. He has submitted other lists to -
the Federal Bureau of Investigation and to the White House. . It is
expected that other elements of the Intelligence Community” will 2
be hearing from Senator Church. :

2. The scope of the investigation necessarily is going to
involve Third Agency |relationships to a considerable degree.

3. Inthe implementation of Executive Order 11652,
"Classification and Declassification of National Security Information .
and Material, "' ' the President directed the following:

-'D. Consent of Originating Department to Dissemination
by Recipient. Except as otherwise provided by Section 102

of the National Security Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 495,50 U.S.C.
403, classified information or material originating in one
Department shall not be disseminated outside any other”
Department to which it has been made available without the
consent of the originating department."

4. As regards Section 102 of the 1947 Act, the following
qnotes 102 (e) in full;

"(3) To the extent recommended by the National Security
Council and approved by the President, such intelligence
of the departments and agencies of the Government, except
as hereinafter provided, relating to the national security, —

maton, 6M

46 Docld:32989628 Page 235


a . ' é . 7 . z« ad .
ary : . : a
& df , le

ye shall be open to the inspection of the Director of Central
Intelligence, and such intelligence as relates to the

national security and is possessed by such departments and
other agencies of the Government, except as hereinafter
provided, shall be made available to the Director of
Central Intelligence for correlation, evaluation and
dissemination: Provided, however, that upon the written
request of the Director of Central Intelligence, the Director a
of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall make available SO
to the Director of Central Intelligence such information --. —_
for correlation, evaluation and dissemination as may be
essential to the national security. "! a .

¥ 5. Iflam requested to provide certain materials and .
investigation indicates that the material asked for involves a document .
which originated within an organization other than the Intelligence ° -
Community Staff or the Central Intelligence Agency, the requestor

will be asked to redirect His inquiry to the office of origin. .-

; 6. It already is apparent, however, that the documentation -
being requested inevitably is going to include references to inter~
relationships among various of the elements of the intelligence

ee ren Powis

‘Se¢omniinity. Clearing each and-evety such referduce WHE ovovy

agency mentioned could manifestly be extremely consuming of time ~ :
and manpower. | , . —_

¥ a1 propose the Ad Hoc Group agree on the following procedure, |
Where it appears that truly sensitive matters are involved, the ,
material will be sanitized by the agency concerned and a check will
be made with the appropriate Third Agency organizations. before
release. Where the reference concerns a Third Agency indirectly’

Pa ° \. : sas “ . ee aaa
7, SorAs not considered sensitive and does not pose policy COnCerTS; the

“4

>

agency concerned may forward the material to the requesting Select
Committee without an item-by-item, mention-by-mention clearance
with Third Agencies. However, in all cases notification that such
material has been forwarded will be made to the central index and

. .

, soe ee
. wy See as a ee al .
“3 Re ty LE POP APT AE 6 OR he
f, Heeb etey, EEE :
GO - Ue et
“ ” ans .
Le? Lig cneyeebbant TSG Pao
“

a .
ye a o. \

i
| NW668296 Docid:32989628 Page 236

all agencies alerted through that mechanism. Agencies will

designate on their submissions to the central index, the name and
telephone number of the releasing party.

8 Ad hoc members should be prepared to discuss and |
come to some agreement on this matter at the next meeting.

JI ohn M. Clarke }
AD/DCI/IC

' NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 237


at 88296 Docld:32989628 Page-238
kK

~~ . +
.

oo THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELUG ENCE
- , . WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505

28 March 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR: USIB Ad Hoc Group

_ SUBJECT: _ ‘Handling of Third Agency |Matters in Response

to Congressional Select Committees

1. As you are aware, Senator Church already has submitted
to me a long list of materials which he requests be provided to his
Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with
Respect to Intelligence Activities. He has submitted other lists to
the Federal Bureau of Investigation and to the White House. . It is
expected that other elements of the Intelligence Community will |
be hearing from Senator Church.

2. The scope of the investigation necessarily is going to
involve Third Agency |relationships to a considerable degree,

3. In the implementation of Executive Order 11652,
"Classification and Declassification of National Security Information:
and Material,'' the President directed the following:

‘"D, Consent of Originating Department to Dissemination
by Recipient. Except as otherwise provided by Section 102 .
of the National Security Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 495,50 U.S.C.
403, classified information or material originating in one
Department shall not be disseminated outside any other ~
Department to which it has been made available without the
consent of the originating department."

4. As regards Section 102 of the 1947 Act, the following
quotes 102 (e) in full:

™(3) To the extent recommended by the National Security
Council and approved by the President, such intelligence
of the departments and agencies of the Government, except
as hereinafter provided, relating to the national security, —

ENCLOSURE

(2-1 29~ bY


oO shall be open to the inspection of the Director of Central
Intelligence, and such intelligence as relates to the
national security and is possessed by such departments and
other agencies of the Government, except as hereinafter
provided, shall be made available to the Director of
Central Intelligence for correlation, evaluation and
dissemination: Provided, however, that upon the written
request of the Director of Central Intelligence, the Director
of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall make available
to the Director of Central Intelligence such information .--
for correlation, evaluation and dissemination as may be
essential to the national security." a .
¥ 5. tam requested to provide certain materials and
investigation indicates that the material asked for involves a document
é which originated within an organization other than the Intelligence -
" Community Staff or the Central Intelligence Agency, the requestor
will be asked to redirect his inquiry to the office of origin...

6. It already is apparent, however, that the documentation
being requested inevitably is going to include references to inter-
relationships among various of the elements of the intelligence
” community. Clearing each and every such cefercucé With covery
agency. mentioned could manifestly be extremely consuming of time
‘and manpower. *

¥ 21 propose the Ad Hoc Group agree on the following procedure.
Where it appears that truly sensitive matters are involved, the :
material will be sanitized by the agency concerned and a check will
be made with the appropriate’ Third Agency organizations before
release. Where the reference concerns a Third Agency indirectly
< 4 Con i is not considered sensitive and does not pose policy corcerns, the
agency concerned may forward the material to the requesting Select
Committee without an item-by-item, mention-by-mention clearance
with Third Agencies. However, in all cases notification that such
material has been forwarded will be made to the central index and

i

. . n

Soe

va Oe regains ELIOT? \
fd

5 2
. wet oo47 f y \
af
, U « ¢. ct \

. 4 gee? Agente gee ME PLES

oF. Co - -
Pegs . \

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 239


4 * . : . fot
. yt j ; .
ne gt ~~ . .
+ . _ . >

all agencies alerted through that. mechanism. Agencies will
designate on their submissions to the central index, the name and

telephone number of the releasing party. Ce
. 8. Ad hoc members should be prepared to discuss and

come to some agreement on this matter at the next meeting.

ae

John M. Clarke ae tae
AD/DCI/IC Da
- ?

__NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 240 -


The Third Agency Rule ~~

_ 1. As early as November 1953, the third agency rule was
included in Executive Order 10501, which has now been revoked.
Section 7(c) prohibited the dissemination of "classified defense
information originating in another Department or agency" to an

‘agency "outside the receiving Department or agency without the --
consent of the originating Department or agency", The only excep |
tion to this rule is that dissemination may be made under the authority
of Section 102 of the National Security Act. This Section authdrizes -- .
the Director of Central Intelligence "to correlate and evaluate intelli- fee.
gence relating to the national security, and provide for the appropriate
dissemination of such intelligence within the Government using, where
appropriate, existing agencies and facilities". .

2. Historically, ‘the responsibility of the DCI to disseminate mS
intelligence has referred to "finished intelligence". This productis |
.the end result of ‘contributions from members of the Intelligence Commu-
nity. Therefore, in this situation the finished product is af homogenous
product and therefore the approval for further dissemination beyond the ©
receiving agency must come from the Central Intelligence Agency ys

Ww,

hoe

3. Executive Order 10501 was. superseded by Executive Order
11652 which became effective 1 June 1972. This Executive order did not
specifically cover the third agency rule. However, it does provide the .
following controls: Sec..9. Special Departmental Arrangemenis. The
originating Department or other appropriate authority may impose, in
conformity with the provisions of this order, special requirements with
respect to access, distribution and protection of classified information
and material, including those which presently relate to communications
intelligence, intelligence sources and methods and cryptography. -

4, In anticipation of the implementation of Executive Order
11652, a directive was issued on May 17, 1972 entitled "National Security . -
Council Directive Governing the Classification, Downgrading, Declassi- ~
fication and Safeguarding of National Security Information". This
“directive does nct contain the term "third agefcy rule” but ‘does have
four subsections which relate to procedures which are similar to what
historically had been called the third agency rule. These section's are: -

A,.(2) Determination of Need-to-Know. In addition ts 2
security clearance, a person must have a need for access
te the particular classified information or material sought
in connection with the performance of his official duties or.

oe c QsuRe _ aff
| MD MLE FE 7, ~ bY

| NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 241

a_i
Hl

oo cos oo @i-ccua obligations. The acteM@nation of that need
_ shall be made by officials having responsibility for the
classified information or material. ,

D. Consent of Originating Department to Dissemination

by Recipient. Except as otherwise provided by Section
102 of the National Security Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 495, 50
U.S.C. 403, classified information or material originating
in one Department shall not be disseminated outside any
other Department to which it has been made available ~

. without the consent of the originating Department.

2 (7 at "BL Dissemination of Sensitive Intelligence Information. “
2S". ""-" * Information or material bearing the notation "WARNING
NOTICE -- SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND-
METHODS INVOLVED" shall not be disseminated in any - oe
manner outside authorized channels without the permission _."-"-.
of the originating Department and an assessment by the :
. senior intelligence official in the disseminating Department _ |:
; as to the potential risk to the national security and to the, -
: mT ae a : intelligence sources and methods involved. ote te

oy “ oo ~ . F; Restraint on Special Access Access Requirements. ' “The ° im
an OO establishment of special rules les limiting access to, distri-  ._ ;
bution and protection of classified information and material |<" ° - :

. under Section 9 of the Order requires the specific prior |
anpraval af the head -nf 2 Denertment ox hie daaciercs, -

“ose

er esi ae
cy

oe ~ 5. Bxamples of the application ‘of the Third Agency Rule are:

. Ss 7 oS - “a Tn a national security - estimate, contributions are |
‘ oo an _  * received from all members of the Intelligence Community a.
; oo, rn then disseminated to members of the community under the
te a , anthority of the DCI; : :

oo ‘(b) A CIA intelligence veport disseminated to the » State” ue
are ~ . Department may not be sent by the State Department to 7
ss the Depariment of Commerce without the permission of the ~
CIA; ; - , : te co
(c) Information which the CIA furnishes the President's
: ne Commission may not be disseminated to other agencies or
‘ . ' to the Congress without the concurrences of CIA. Thus,
a request from the Congress to the Commission for CIA
information should be referred to CIA for action so that
the necessary protection of the information can he insured.

‘

so
i NW 68296 Doctd: 32989628 Page 242. .

€ ‘

oO ‘ ¢ If the Navy Department a... one of its operations

: with CIA, CIA may not include information about that operation
in papers it disseminates to other agencies unless it has
received the permission of the Navy Department. The distinc~ |

ew _ tion here is that a Navy operation would not be considered part ©
of the finished intelligence mechanism and therefore would
not fall within the statutory authority of CIA to disseminate
intelligence. wo, os

j oe

} a ¥y
. NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 243}

é

rm
\,

FROM

SUBJECT: Gohware SELECT. COMMITTEE

ot

7
nay OF LG,
IFIED -’

BY

ALL INFORMATION CONTAT.
HEREIN IS UNCLASS
ALESD,

DATE

nO G24 PhdoiB.40e8a628 Page eA | “

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN, REG, NO. 27

UNITED STATES .

Memorandum

Mr. clevelana|

G. R. Steel fS

- .
5010-106 xn gee >
° >
. Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm, —
Dep. AD Ipy

Ext/Kifairs

Files & Com. —
Gen. Inv.
ident.
Inspection
Intell.

UP” pe

By agreement, the FBI is currently conducting full field »
investigations regarding SSC staff personnel. These have extremely
short (2 week) deadlines which are identical to those afforded
Presidential appointments and are, therefore, given preferential
treatment in opening, assigning, and following field progress. The,,

Py
Q
ox
a:

INTELLIGENCE. ACTIVITIES ¢SSa)
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON
INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (HSC)

Special Inquiry Unit of the Employees Security and Special Inquiry
Section, which has about twice its normal case load, is handling
these requests. Senator Church, Chairman, SSC, originally estimate
that between 35 and 40 staff members would be submitted for investia
gation. As of today, 4-3-75, we have received requests for 65 such#
investigations from the SSC and the end does not appear to be in 5
Sight. They are received in bunches as many as 6 at a time, which
is not the even flow expected and presents an additional burden

y

ay etyeouae :

t.

eying

In addition it is expected that similar requests will-fe
forthcoming in the near future from the HSC since we have a simflar
agreement with it. Congressman Nedzi, Chairman of the HSC, fas
estimated "probably no more than about 25 staff members will be
hired.” It remains to be seen if this estimate also falls short of}
actual receipts.

they will have to be considered in the budget. It is noted the
current charge for a aire mth where applicable, is &

$2028 . eg ba LU Be Som - SS

ACTION: For information. Since Ee Ae the nucleus of “the
Committee has been formed, it is suggested Senato "se? con-
tacted and queried regarding a more realistic (30 day) deadline on
the remaining investigations concerning future Btaf# héniBrs and
their replacements.

Pema bivnitnsensier eel ete |

Mintz - (Legal Analysis Office)

Cleveland ud unk were
pe Y- 73) he oaggee

1 - Mr. Adams 1 - Mr.
1- Mr. Walsh 1 —- Mr.

1 - Mr. Steel

GRS:dce AL - (Ge, POE one
Q 3
“e- (YS fp hehe Ljecipt,
ln 8 See aa foe *eanox or poder? ebaghe he eee
gun 1 ie 1975 Be [pica PRC h mes

Brandt? Lwith

we


62-)16395- b2X ba /1bH OY ~ b

cay) CHANGED TO ;

JUN 42 1975

AMank, | %

- NW 88296 Dochd:32989628 Page 245

ee 7 ee oo |

5

( AROM

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 ae “sote=tee
JOSmGEN AEG AO. 27 }
“UNITED STATES GO\@RNMENT
Memorandum
TO ‘Mr. W. R. Wannall

-W. O Wegar

SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75.
co ;

draft of a paper prepared by CIA entitle

%

DATE: 3/3/75

Mr. Adams
Mr. Mintz

bt et
Pru

Mr. Wannall
Mr. Cregar

Apr

This memorandum recommends tlea eA attache d
d, NT

Assoc. Dir.
Dep. AD Adm. __
Dep. AD Inv.

Asst. Dir:

Admin,
Comp. Syst. ——
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com,
Gen. Inv.
| Ident.
ginspection
me, tell. aa
fe Pret
Plon. & Eval.
Spec. Inv.

Training —
Legal Coun. 14

Telephone Rm.
Director See’y __

Anbiguities and

the Law," be™ réViewed by the Gegal Counsel Division for comment

and that a member of the Division be named to represent the FBI
in future meetings with legal representatives from other U. S.

Intelligence Board (USIB) agencies and departments.

The purpose

of such a group is to develop recommendations for changes in

existing laws or the proposal of new legislation which Mr. Colby
as the Director of Central Intelligence can offer to the Senate
Select Committee for their consideration.

At a meeting of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group on
Congressional Review of the Intelligence Community 2/27/75,
“Anbiguities and the Law," was distributed
This paper was drafted by Mr. Marvin Smith of
It is considered a starting point for the Intelligence

draft paper entitled,
_to all members.
CIA.

yy

pee

aa

Community to identify areas in existing statutes that should be
changed, as well as to recommend new legislation deemed necessary
to clarify for the Congress and the American people the authori-
ties, the limitations and missions of various member agencies

In furnishing copies of this paper to members, the
Chairman of the Ad Hoc Group, Mr. John Clarke, acknowledged the
paper presents a starting point and in no way should be considered
He suggested that Legal Counsel representatives
of each agency or department of USIB review the document and
submit their comments directly to Mr. Marvin Smith, on Agency
Following the receipt of such comments

agencies and departments, it

‘
Na q
S28 or departments of the Intelligence Community.
KE BS

So

8 3

RS

SS} a final draft.

fg a

EE

wit code 143, extension 4055.

ag from the legal offices of member

was proposed that a meeting would be called in an effort to

begin drafting a paper representative of the Intelligence Community
which would reflect recommended changes in existing | statutes or
CS coi oe oN

proposals for new tegistation.

REC-10 62 - rib. 3 Z c—
SEE ADDENDUM, |

Enclosure a)
62-116395 im Re
WOC:din/ebe enclS

2911975

NW 68296 Docid:329896268 Page 246
po

BEAL bane

IVISION PAGE 3

2 ee =
CONTINUED & Ove R
‘ \

‘


i
e

| Memorandum for Mr. Wannall
RE: SENSTUDY 75
62-116395

| The Department of Justice is represented on the
Ad Hoc Group by Mr. James Wilderotter, Associate Deputy
Attorney General, and there will be Departmental participa-
tion in this matter,

ACTION:

(i) That the attached CIA paper entitled, "Ambiguities
and the Law,'' be reviewed by the Legal Counsel Division for
comment in concert with representatives of the Intelligence
Division.

(2) That the Legal Counsel Division designate a
representative to participate in the drafting of a paper to
be furnished by Mr. Colby to the Senate Select Committee for
their consideration.

te e

CONTINUED - OVER

NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page 247

[

Memorandum to Mr. Wannall dtd 3/3/75
Re: SENSTUDY 75
62-116395

i
oe
ADDENDUM, LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION, 3/5/75, JH:msl

In view of the direct impact on operations of the Intelligence
Division, we feel that representatives of that Division should participate
in and coordinate these matters. Legal Counsel will review attached.
CIA paper and will furnish representative to assist the Intelligence Division
regarding proposals and legislative language.

eg

NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 243


om

| NW.88296 Docld:32989628 Page 249

‘AMBIGUITIES AND THE LAW

CIA, NSA, DIA, FBI and, to some extent, several other"
Federal Agencies, collect information and produce intelligence, but
of different kinds and for different purposes. This is recognized in
practice but is not as clearly established in the law. Given some
lack of clarity in the law and some uncertainty regarding limits
placed on intelligence activities, misunderstanding and fear of abuse
of power easily thrivey. in reality, however, in the implementation
of mission and charters and jin direction and control, “there are not
as many unresolved ambiguities as the uninformed may suppose.

The experience following the National Security Act of 1947 is
such that it is now possible to eliminate some of the vagueness of
the language of the Act. The certainty and public confidence that
should result from clarifications in the law should far outweigh any —
disadvantages. A number of possible amendments or additions to
current laws have already been mentioned, and proposed legislation

has already been submitted for some. These ideas and others are

suggested, below.

sort \“&e oo
_ tts autre
ee go" ENCLOSURE

1) Clarify CIA's mission and charter by

amending the National Security Act of 1947 to’ ”

reflect:

-~-that included in the proper functions

of the Agency are (a) collection of foreign
intelligence information; (b) conduct of
activities to carry out CIA's counter-

inte lligence ves ponsibilities overseas;

and (c) conduct of covert action operations

oyerseas when authorized by the President;

~-that CLA's responsibility to produce
intelligence relates only to foreign
intelligence;

--that it is a duty ‘of the Agency to develop

~~

advanced technical equipment to improve

.the collection and processing of foreign.

intelligence information; and

_ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 250

ve

~-that the conduct of any counterintelligence

operation or other activity overseas directed
specifically at U.S. citizens (other than CIA
“employees) will be undertaken in coordination
with the FBI or as requested by the FBI or by

other USG agencies in coordination with the FBI.

a

Establish the authority for those agencies engaged

in the collection and production of foreign intelligence to
carry on certain specified activities within the United

States, such as:

~-protection of classified information and , a

their own installations against penetration

and compromise; ‘° . ~

.~-investigation of employees, applicants,

and those persons who could assist the U.S.

foreign intelligence effort;

_NW,88296 Docld:32989628 Page 251

--investigation of employees and other
individuais to be granted access to. sensitive

information;

--collection of foreign intelligence
information from foreign nationals and.

from cooperating U.S. citizens;

--establishment of mechanisms in support

of foreign intelligence activities; and

--cooperation with the FBI in investigations
relating to the unauthorized disclosure of

foreign intelligence.

3) Remove uncertainty regarding responsibility for

internal security matters by modifying appropriate laws to

establish clearly:

-« -

e

--that the collection of counterintelligence
information in the United States and the
collection of information related to internal

security are functions of the FBI;

NW 88256 Docid:32989628 Page 252


e ’
Y }
d dj

~-that the responsibility for the
production of intelligence related to ~ 7
internal security rests with the FBI; and
--that with due regard to assessed
reliability of the information and
responsibilities for protecting sources

and methods, those agencies engaged in
foreign intelligence activities will make _
available to the FBI and other Federal
agencies, as appropriate, the security

and counterintelligence information relating
to foreign nationals in the United States and

to U.S, citizens which is derived as a by-

product of foreign intelligence activities.

oe
- ©

4) Recognize international terrorism and international

illegal drug activities as threats to U.S, national security —

' and proper targets for U.S, foreign intelligence efforts,

as well as for internal security operations.

NW 88296 Docld:22989628 Page 253

‘5) Provide protection against the unauthorized
disclosure of intelligence sources and methods by:
--providing for the protection of intelligence
sources and methods on a statutory basis

independent of Executive Order 11652;

~-clarifying that the Director of Central
Intelligence is responsible for protecting
intelligence sources and methods related

to foreign intelligence and foreign

f counterintelligence;

--assigning to the Director of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation the duty of protecting
intelligence sources and methods related to
internal security and to counterintelligemce
within the United States; ~

' --imposing specific burdens, upon officers

and employees of all branches of the gowern-

ment and others granted official access, not

to disclose such information without autthorization,

NW,88296 Docld:32989628 Page 254

and providing criminal sanctions for unauthorized

*
. “kh "te

disclosures;

--establishing effective injunctive recourse,
through the Attorney General, for protection

of all intelligence sources and methods;

; --providing for in camera judicial review
of materidl revealing intelligence sources
n

and methods when relevant and necessary

to criminal and civil proceedings;

~-delineating authorities and responsibilities.
for investigating suspected ‘or discovered
unauthorized disclosures by {a) U.S. citizens
overseas and (b) all persons within the

an

United States. — .

6) Delineate areas of interagency assistance that
facilitate performance of authorized missions, promote
- economy of resources, and as a matter of policy are

desirable, for example:

NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page #55

~-cooperation in research and development

ove

> “ke

of technical collection and information pro-

cessing equipment, methods and techniques;

-~-loan or supply of equipment, methods and

i

techniques;

--provision of training in special skills and

=

techniques;

--passage of information derived as a by-
product of foreign intelligence activities to
those agencies responsible for the matters

involved.

. A few changes in the procedures for reviewing intelligence
activities might add considerable understanding and confidence. Of
paramount importance is a form of congressional oversight that permits
the provision to Congress of the necessary information in a timely,
efficient and controlled manner. It is recognized that a number of
Committees in both the Senate and House must be informed of sub-

stantive intelligence, operational matters and fiscal details in varying

| degrees. Just as in the executive branch, the test of access should be

- NW 85296 Docid:32989628 Page #56

i "need-to-know, " To apply this test and to control and protect

sensitive information provided to Congress, a focal point within .,.

Congress would be extremely helpful. Whether a joint committee

or not, such a focal point would also be valuable in facilitating
changes in laws affecting intelligence activities. Congress might
find that a more uniform approach to budget presentation and review
would provide better insight and understanding.
The foregoing suggestions are by no means definitive. They
* :
do, however, present areas that in the experience of the intelligence

community deserve careful attention. .

NW 88296 Docid:22989628 Page 257

sais omey 5010-106
UNITED STATES Gi ERNMENT , Assoc. Dir.
y y Dep. AD Adm. —
1 - Legal Counsel Division Dep, AD Inv. —
> Memorandum 1 ~ Legal Counsel Divi woe
1- Mr. W. QO. Cregar cones Osh
TO : Legal Counsel Division DATE: 4/7/75 Files & Com —
1-~Mr.A.L. Lacey, dr. fons Inve
- Inspection
FROM:
Mr wv. R. Wannall 9), =, / i a a ieee
‘ wi . Ae Plen. & Eval. —
sunjecr: J. §,SENATE SELECT COMMITTER MATERIAL; \ Low soe IB
AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE EXHIBITS IN  f ie rydilcl ez
{INTELLIGENCE DIVISION POSITION PAPER i we ta Ones ery
mo

‘ON “JURISDICTION” DATED 2/13/75
Nae

The purpose of this memorandum is to advise that on 4/7/
Mr. James Wilderotter , Executive Office Building, Washington, personally
reviewed and approved each of the following exhibits from the captioned paper
for release to the Select Committee:

1) Exhibit A - Historical Highlights.

2) Exhibit B - Confidential Memoranda: John Edgar Hoover, 8/24/36;
8/25/36; and, 9/10/36.

3) Exhibit C - Presidential Directives: 6/26/39; 9/6/39; 1/8/43;
7/24/50; 12/15/53; and, 10/30/47. rn

4) Exhibit D - The Delimitations Agreement of 2/ 23/49, as: aniendea

5) Exhibit E - National Security Council Charters of the I Sid/na
the ICIS.

6) Exhibit F - National Security Action Memorandum 161, 6/9/62.
7) Exhibit G - Department of Justice Memorandum dated 3/5/64,

setting forth new Charter for the IIC under supervision of the
Attorney General.

8) Exhibit H - Preamble and Section 101 of the National Securi
Act of 1947. : ;
: WO 9 be to -(Ug
9) Exhibit L - exon EAB oomen ei FBI Sresclor Fooy Hoover's s.brietir
of the National Security Council on 11/6/58.
x APR 101975

ALL: vb ceenmans! MENADEeyESt senate

(5) ry 4 au ‘CONTINUED - OVER

cs at ’ Y
aS hea gd é

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 258 1

- fe


NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page #59

4 °

Memorandum to Legal Counsel Division
Re: U.S. Senate Select Committee Material; Authorization’ to Release Exhibits
in "Intelligence Division Position Paper on Jurisdiction" dated 2/18/75

10) Exhibit N - Background information concerning the emergency
detention provisions of the Internal Security Act of 1950.

11) Exhibit O - Memorandum by former FBI Director Hoover, dated
5/11/61, concerning Cuban individuals and groups.

12) Exhibit Q - Memorandum of former Attorney General Ramsey
Clark dated 9/14/67, concerning urban riot activities.

13) Exhibit R - Departmental Memorandum dated 2/18/69, concerning
instructions on campus disorders.

14) Exhibit S - Excerpts from testimony of former Director Hoover.
15) Section of paper on "Statutes."

It was explained to Mr. Wilderoitter that the extracted exhibits were
letters and reports =e from phe White House and/or National Security Council
with which there are (Third Agency Rule" problems. As soon as cleared, it
was planned to forward these to the Committee. He requested to review these
exhibits prior to forwarding.

ACTION:
Upon "Third Agency Rule" approval regarding other exhibits, have

same reviewed by Mr. Wilderotter. INTD will insure exhibits are made
available for Mr. Wilderotter's review.

Qt of

p.
pe.


OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10
MAY 1962 EDITION
GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27

Dep. AD Adm.

l-~ Mr, J, J. McDermott Ase Dire

Memorandum

@ 5010-106
UNITED sgh ERNMENT @ ® Assoc. Dir, ——

Dep. AD inv. —

(Attention: Mr. J,W. Awe = Admin, ___

" Room 5644, JEH) Kn
\ yo 5 Bre We Re vanadyl pate: 4/11/75 ied

ra
Genf/Inv. —___—

\
‘Yirnon : W, oO, creak?

yi cr. —
SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75

fod foot font fot

fn

ry

Hy Project Senstudy 75, established within tne

Intelligence Division, for the purpose of developing a wy?

capability of implementing requests received from the hee

Select Committees of the Congress, Bureau file 62~1L16395 1F% Pre
has been opened for this Project, we

Because of the unusual factors relating to this
entire Project, such as the sensitive nature of much of the

the file very readily available to the working staff at all
times, and Similar other reasons, it is essential that the
file be maintained in the work area of the Project which, (
effective 4/14/75, will be in room 4063, JEH, The purpose of U
this memorandum, therefore, is to have Files and Communications

Division take necessary steps to arrange for the maintenance
of the file in the designated room rather than in the usual
manner, => fh
“yy
wt There has already been much publicity about the
Qo ye Select Committees and we anticipate much more, This involves
Layentriaes) many newspaper stories, It is, therefore, believed very
Rules ” desirable that a Sub A file to the main’ file be opened as
7 WEE 9 the standardized repository for newspaper articles, Asa
wen a, first step, it will be necessary that a few articles already

in the main file be extracted aced in the new Sub A
Yfile in the usual chronologicayte

f , The foregoing matters have been already discussed
vfs ed with Mr. J, W. Awe, Unit Chief, of the Files and Communications

: S APR 15 1975
& “. This memorandum to be referred to the Files and

Qs Communications Division for appropriate action as abdéye.
Ru
dy
\
NN

Se gt ey
Ae mee

~ AY ANSP
62116395 Le Kas. (yh NM

NW 60296 Docld:32909628 Page 260

material involved, urgency for handling, necessity for having \
.

Inspection ____

~ Mr. J, A, Mintz dent.
~ Mc, W. R, Wannall Inerction —
~ Mr. We O. Cregar Laboratory —___

- Mr. 5S. F. Phillips ty bt gen & Evel
Nate

lephone Rm. —
ifecfor Sec’y __

ay

Division, ee ee
BE. ° a ca
4] ire RECOMMENDATION : ;

i

ae yp wes
Wathen.

tine «

sey pa

I

an b

CE -~/74aY —

rder , REC-B (+ 9 Me 392-b69

SY FELD IN


OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 5010106

MAY 1962 EDITION @- ®@ &
GSA GEN, REG, NO. 27
UAITED STATES é -RNMENT- ry Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm.*_

L - Mr. W. R. Wannall Dep. AD Inv, __
He Memorandum DIME ml we eocedee Ao
. 1

Admin,

‘\ - Mr. H. E. Helgeson Comp. Syst. —.
» ‘ Ext. Affairs __
TO > Mr We R. Wannall ‘} DATE: 4/9/75 Files & Com. __
Gen. Inv.
1 - Mr. A. B. Fulton Ident.
~ Inspection
FROM : W. ol edgar 1 - Mr. J. G. Deegan Inset
. 1 - Mr. H. C. Flemister  ,cbertory
FE ene nee Hrd ws 1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar Plon. & Eval. —
ec ~ xe . Spec. Inv.
SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75 “~ FOL THFORRN TON HORA THES Training
eset apgenne ee wee Yerere TS UES. AS wLF TED regal Covn
| 9/e/ 2 SP opened ATG tte Ros —
This memorandum provides for the record the Fa
temporary reassignment of Bureau Supervisors in the Intelligénte
Division.

Project Senstudy 75 has been established within
the Intelligence Division, effective 4/4/75. Its purpose is
to develop a capability of implementing requests received i
from the Select Committees of the Congress in a comprehensive AT
and timely fashion but yet allow the Bureau to continue to
conduct its day-to-day business in as normal a manner as
possible.

Pursuant to the establishment of Project Senstudy 75,
certain Bureau Supervisors in the Intelligence Division have
been relieved of substantive assignments. They are as follows:

Section Chief William 0. Cregar, effective 4/4/75,
has assumed the responsibilities of administering the Project.

Unit Chief Elmer W. Larson, effective the same date,
will function as Cregar' s Number One Man. j
[lb 2is7-

Liaison supstyiter Lett, sChurcte has been relieved
of his regular liaison duties and will Gunection.as..the Liaison
Officer in contact with the intelligende community for
Project Senstudy 75. % APR 10 1975

Unit Chief Seymor F. Phillips, effective 4/8/75,
was assigned to the Project and will function as the Review

Coordinator.

1 - Personnel file of W. 0. Cregar

1 - Personnel file of E. W. Larson ty
1 - Personnel file of L. F. Schwartz. ‘ue
i - Personnel file of S. F. Phillips \)

‘4

Woc:imh | mh
rR (12). CONTINUED - OVER

OBAPR 4 6 1975

NW 88796 Dochd:32989628 Page 261

, a ——— a ee

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannalil
Re: Senstudy 75

At this time the length of the temporary assignment
is indefinite. Upon the termination of Project Senstudy 75,
the Bureau Supervisors mentioned above will revert back to
their substantive assignments. and an appropriate memorandum
for the record will be prepared.

ACTION:

For information and record purposes.

Mt)

NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page #62


.

a heal
~  OPIIONAD FORM NO. 10 5010-106
BY 1982 EDHION
-” GSA GEN, REG. NO. 27 ”
we O72

- UNITED STATES -RNMENT

Memorandum

Comp. Syst. —_

oo. :Mr. J. B. Adams y, DATE: 3-12-75 nie
we i} ? 7 Gen. Inv.

—

aoe oth

&

a

een Ident.

* « ; a rae
aa vi
ey A
coos In
€

ROM : Legal Couns ; Me

Paz!

Laboratory

6. ew NO RROE 8 rae
/ C2- ., . re Plan. & Eval. __

“4 at a Spec. Inv.

SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75 \ i Traiging 4
i ; # Pract Gad. '

Mee ne ee elepliéne Rm. __

In attached W. 0. Cregar to Mr. W. R. Wannall irector Sec’y —
memorandum of 3-6-75, captioned as above, it is recommended

that the Legal Counsel Division coordinate and assign respon-

sibilities to appropriate Divisions for the collection and

preparation of certain materials we can anticipate the Senate j/ pep
Select Committee (SSC) will soon request from the FBI. o-7 K

In this regard, it is suggested that all Divisions
receiving requests for information in connection with testimony
before this Committee respond in the same commendable and expedi-
tious manner that they responded in connection with the preparation
of the Director's Brief on his testimony before the House Subcommittee
on Civil Rights and Constitutional Rights. The format of this infor~4
mation should generally be as follows: }

gle

oe
wf

1 - Heading in all caps, centered, brief description of Ft

CLASS

Ve

contents;

of

2 - White, watermarked bond paper, 8 x 10 1/2";

HEREIN IS
DATE.

Av, INFORMATION CoNTATNED™” 704 i
IFIED
By SP 2.Aen/ Pe
3

3 - At least a 2" left margin. This is essential since.
material will be inserted into a folder;

4 - Double spaced; .

L,

ARs 5 - Do not number pages;

gf

ce 6 - Each Division will be responsible for the accuracy

ean) and completeness of the information furnished in final form. This .

: ¥} will also include up-dating any i rmation previously, furnished; 4 P
. ¥Y ops REC-23 fe ie Op 70
“g 7 - Use "Mag" card typewriter (courier Ba41): identifying

* caption on the card folder should be adequate to readily identify
ye it with the corresponding paper. In addition to the capttengecarden |
Can folder should also have the name of the originating Division.
ae) HT APR 101975,
DB 8 - Furnish all "Mag" cards to the Legislative Matters

Pa Section, Legal Counsel Division, along with the write-upRe 0" ===ce
2 Enc. :
ins 1,- Mr. Callahan - Enc. 1 - Each Assistant Director (Enc.
7 1 - Mr. Adams - Enc. f

2 y. -yenkins - Enc. Ah ad }
5.EAP RLS a7; | ° CONTINUED - OVER (e Nas

i > foowat } | 4 -" A ¥
| nw 88296 hit sroao6MIGIO mer . vane of 4 L |


Legal Counsel to Mr. J. B. Adams memo

- Re: Senstudy 75

All mail should be routed through and coordinated
with the Legislative Matters Section, Legal Counsel Division,
and all contacts with the Senate and House committees will be
handled by representatives of the Legal Analysis Office,
Legislative Matters Section, Legal Counsel Division.

Bach Division should advise the Legislative Matters
Section the identity of individual who will be the contact
and coordinator of that Division's responsibilities along
with his phone extension.

The Intelligence Division will be responsible for
representing the Bureau on the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group and
the identity of such individual should be made known to the
Legislative Matters Section. In addition, the Intelligence
Division should accumulate the data identified in paragraphs
l and 2, as they pertain to the FBI, in Mr. John M. Clarke's
memorandum to all members of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group and
submit this in the form suggested above.

The Administrative Division is requested to obtain the
information set forth in paragraph 3 of Mr. Clarke's memorandum,
also furnishing this data in narrative form as explained above.

RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

PN

NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 254


TO

{ejecr:

/6

nok.

ALT THYORMATTON conthrnED

fiewutiil IS UNCLASSIFIER -~

et

* GSA GEN. REG, NO, 27

: Mr. W. R. Wannall

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 S010-106

MAP 1962 EDITION

"4 s . ° .
q - me a Assoc. Dir.
, Dep. AD Adm. _

1 - Mr. Callahan Ane oie
1 - Mr. Adams

UNITED STATES ,

Memorandum

wie gL

Admin,
Comp. Syst. —
Ext. Affairs —_
Files & Com. _

pate: 3/6/75

Gen. Inv,
1 = Each Assistant Director —
Intell.
Laboratory

W. i @recax

SENSTUDY 75

1 - Mr. Cregar

Legal Coun. __
Plan. & Eval.
Spec. Inv.

Training

Telephone Rm. —

Director Spc;
This memorandum recommends that the Legal Counsel ine
Division coordinate and assign responsibilities to appropriat
Divisions for the collection and preparation of certain material
we anticipate the Senate Select Committee (SSC) will soon request
from the FBI.

i

fr
Memorandum W. 0. Cregar to W. R. Wannall, dated Al
3/5/75, reported the results of a meeting between Senator Church 4
and Mr. Colby wherein Senator Church advised he anticipated

asking all agencies and departments of the Intelligence Community
for (1) Organizational charts broken down to a branch level going
back to 1947, (2) Copies of all budgets since 1947 and (3) Docu-
ments reflecting all cash flows since 1947,

Attached is a copy of a short letter from Mr. John
Clarke, Chairman of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group on Congres-
sional Review of the Intelligence Community to Mr. William G.
Miller, Staff Director, SSC. Also attached is a copy of a
memorandum from Mr. Clarke to all members of the Ad Hoc Coordina-
ting Group on Congressional Review of the Intelligence Community.
This memorandum sets out in more detail what information the
SSC will be seeking from all agencies making up the Intelligence
Community. It should be noted that on page two of Mr. Clarke's
memorandum he notes a formal request from Senator Church to all
agencies can be expected.

The Intelligence Division believes considerable time
and effort will be required from several Divisions to pult this
information together. It is believed we should pee N, now
assemble the data in antics Part ga" a eeoa fp

Ve NCL OSURE mast
ACTION: If you agree, the px 10 al | Cound? A 3 Od Le? £5 écordin

this matter and assign responsibilities to. appropriate Division
for the collection and preparation of the materig?we “SITtici pate
the SSC will fequest from the FBI.

© APR 10 1975

To. ek \at |
n sure be |
Wocrehe ego" ue yer ao “S i \)
(16) dev 26h aad 6h . uN .
pe hex é ‘Ss rt
ye CY, ,
3 VA's 8

/) ff
HAL OISEAE t


. yy . . 7 a q
@reccron OF CENTRAL wrewca le .
. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505
4 March 1975

Mr. William G. Miller
Staff Director

* Select Committee to Study Governmental , — sollte 8
Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities wos +f ss ame soli
United States Senate ree Eke

ae
Goan

Washington, D. ©. 20510
‘Dear Eo NiBien

Pursuant to your request, I have advised all members of the Ad Hoc
‘Group of the United States Intelligence Board and Mr. Thomas K. Latimer,
Special As sistant to the Secretary of Defense, of Senator Church's request
to provide legal authority and-organization charts of USI ‘entities from

. their inception. I also have alerted them to the Committee's desire for

’ comprehensive historical data on personnel, budgets, anc cash flow for
the sarne periods. They will expect to hear moré: directhy from Senator
Church on these matters. -

By early next t week, we will begin providing you the CIA data in *:
response to the Chairman's request. The first set of annexes developed
under the auspices of the USIB Ad Hoc Group is ready and I am having

_ five copies of each run off for your use. Please advise if more copies
. are desired. ;

Sincer ely,

y. M. Clarke
A

ssociate Deputy to the DCI :
for the Intelligence Community

Attachment:
Memo to Ad Hoc Group

Epa ~ 66 |

_ «ENCLOSURE

NW 88796 Docld:32989628 Page 266

: - 4 DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE é. re

WASHINGTON, D, C. 20505

eoele

“gah 2ay peogeians oath 4 Mar ch t 97 5 : ~ .

OPE E Sse a7

ve

MEMORANDUM FOR: Principals of the Ad Hoc Coordinating
, Group on Congressional Review

SUBJECT: _Information Requested by Senate Select
Comuzniitee Staff Director a

°

1. Senator Church has asked the Director to provide to the
Senate Select Committee copies of CIA legal authorities and organi-
. zation charts to branch levels, 1947-1975. He also indicated he
Doe wants slauiesc autboriines aa vhacks fuc all UGG enkities from
their inceptions, fn the case of CIA this wilh he from 1947; NSA

from. 1952; DIA from 1961; ete. Lo he

. 2 The Committee is ‘secking a comprehensive historical -
base Line for each U.S. intelligence orgamization--its structure and _
the people ievolved over time. Therefore, Senator Church has asked ~
thet the names: of ali incumbents who have held supervisory responsi-

. bilities over the period, down through the branch lewel, alsa be pro-
wided,. The Staff Director has heen made aware: of the difficulties
involved ia tracing personnel assignments too far back but asks that
every effert be made ta meet the request. CA is: Proceeding

aecordingly. 2 . .

3 Semator Church has also asked for budget and cash flow
data om ali U.S. intelligence organizations from their inceptions.
The CIA finds that the source and uses tables, emaployed in annual
financial reports, provides the historical profile desired. Supple-
mnentakl date em specific programs ean follewif requested. Senator
Church wants data which will show specific patterns of expenditures

- | evcuosl Weds sb

| NW G8296 Docld:32989628 Page 267


as distinct from budgets and appropriations. A formal request

from the Chairman to all agencies on this matter can be expected.

4, The Senate Select Committee will be ready to receive
classified material this week. It is suggested that Ad Hoc Group
members begin assembling the legal, organizational, personnel,
and budgetary data for early submission. Ihave provided Mr. ©
Miller, Staff Director, with a-list of Ad Hoc Principals, phone
numbers, titles, etc. He understands that the central point for
DOD is Mr. Thomas K, Latimer and for Treasury, Mr. Edward
C. Schmults, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement. ;

" os : . Peta
oe "John M.’ Clarke .
w-~ Associate Deputy to the DCI
for the Intelligence Community

4

“NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 268 2

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 . 3010-106 “ }

MAY 1962 EDITION “1

GSA GEN, REG. NO. 27 4 ad ~

UNITED STA’ - és , Assoc. Dit
3

Dep. AD Adm.

M, a: 1-Mr. Callahan bars AD Inve —
emoranaum 1-Mr. Adams Admin
1-Mr. Jenkins Comp, Syste —
Mr. J. B, Adams are: 3/21/75 Files & Com —
. 1-Each Assistant Director ren. i
. 1-Mr,. Cregar pe ile ctlon A
Mr. Ww. R. Wannali 1-Mr. Farrington Ze ap
ram 1-Mr. Fulton Mi « ae
SUBJECT: — SENSTUDY 75 (: y Pen. Evel — j
Semmens juts Atemeney nse ety an0 Training

$y By memorandum Legal Counselto J. B, Adams = wore
dated 3/12/ 7 5, the Legal Counsel Division mdicated that its 4}
Legislative Matters. Section would coordimate and assign t as
responsipilities within the Bureau for the collection and

preparation of material for tue Senate Select Committee, ran ,

ae A a
2 TE ce
This memorandum instructed Intelligence Division

to accumulate data which was identified in a memorandum from

Mr. John M, Clarke from the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group of the pate

Intelligence Committee. Clarke*s memorandum was attached to

W. O. Cregar to W. R. Wannall memorandum dated 3/6/75. Aa!
* The identified data to be collected outlined in Clarke's memorandum A

was proposed-type data that the Senate Select Committee has Hi
- indicated an interest in.

see

’ ” In view of 3/19/75 letter subsequently received from
Senator Frank Church (Democrat, Idauo), Chairman of the Senate
Select Committee, to tne Attorney General outlining a request for
specific FBI documents they are interested in receiving, the
Intelligence Division has begun accumulating this specific data,

In view of this request for specific data, the Intelligence Division
will not accumulate the data outlmed in the Clarke memorandum
since it was only in the nature of proposed data and differs from
the specific data to be collected whichis extensive in nature.

ACTION: feX 104 Re ta Mas 39 § ey,

f.,

Onn es For information. - ee —
parrot oD Fol . | dy / a: APR 10 1975
an B a eee wee
os ana sil
ABF: enn , y NY i
(x9) wie _ \ v |
~ ig

FO APR 15 1975

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page #69


0 Tee

" 4
oa G \y OFFIONAL FORUANO. 10
¢ MAY 1962 EDITION

: * 4 Dep. AD Adm. —
1 \ . NM m * Dep. AD Inv, —
Nee DATE: 4/8/75 ex rs —
TO : Mr. Groover + ¢ oO : 4/8/7 Fe ms
Ident.

FROM, J. Jd. Clynick Inspection
KO rene
supjecT: ,SSENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES Tetning
~ : Legal Coun.

88296 Docld:32989628 Page 270

GSA GEN, REG. NO, 27

UNITED STATES G

Assoc, Dir. —_—.

Telephone Rm. —
Director Sec’y

In order to respond to item TI-C of Senator Church's
letter dated 3/19/75, it was necessary to survey all field offices. This
was done, the response summarized and forwarded to Legal Counsel
Division by memo dated 4/3,

the field used to compile our response. It is believed these should be
filed as one item as an EBF.

Attached hereto are the file copies of the teletypes from i
RECOMMENDATION:
That attached be filed as an EBF.

Enclosure

sacs

[sre HZ app 10 1975 -
‘pe

wh INFORMATION Hey ED 4

cee iad 3e see Auster Ki
DATS wai) af 3- Nie

>
7 QAPR 161979


il ae pth wsaherletaote

ae

aot!

Figg ®

Tee ge
ety a “age

2TF

age

ee
ae

»


hi

: COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

aL

—_ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

NROO4 AL CODE MAR 2 6 1975

4:09 PM MITEL MARCH 26, 1975 CHP NY “VRE
. TELE 4 iV. ; ptell eee ‘
. AnD INFOREATTON COMA EK!A - VOT Pla ee |
TOs DIRECTOR, FBI HeEBIN TS pigiicstrtz OT Spee Inve ot = f
DATR i, g Traini iz. ~—
FROME SAC, ALBANY a g [SP Zerml eg Lagat Coun
; Slephone Rm,
ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION, Director Sec'y

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL SACS DATED MARCH 24, 1975.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS SET FORTH IN REFERENCED
BUREAU TELETYPE, THE FOLLOWING IS ALBANY DIVISION'S RESPONSEs
1 FIELD SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS
AND SPENDS 4@ PERCENT OF SUPERVISORY TIME. 23 AGENTS ASSIGNED
ON PART-TIME BASIS TO INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS AND THE PERCENTAGE
OF TIME SPENT IS AS FOLLOWS:
8 AGENTS AT 5 PERCENT; 2 AGENTS AT 19 PERCENT$ 2 AGENTS AT
15 PERCENTs 2 AGENTS AT 2@ PERCENT; 1 AGENT AT 39 PERCENT; 1}
AGENT AT 35 PERCENT; 2 AGENTS AT 45 PERCENT$ 1 AGENT AT 58 PERCENT3
1 AGENT AT 6@ PERCENTs 2 AGENTS AT 75 PERCENT; 1 AGENT AT
85 PERCENT.
1 FIELD SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
MATTERS AND SPENDS 4@ PERCENT OF SUPERVISORY TIME. 23 AGENTS
ASSIGNED ON A PART-TIME BASIS TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS AND
THE PERCENTAGE OF TIME SPENT BY THESE AGENTS ON

Bf.
* O]

\

Page 272

—_—

PAGE 2

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS IS AS FOLLOWS:
§ AGENTS AT 5 PERCENT; 5 AGENTS AT 18 PERCENTs
4 AGENTS aT 15 PERCENT; 2 AGENTS AT 39 PERCENT; 2 AGENTS

AT 35 PERCENT; 1 AGENT AT 45 PERCENT; 2 AGENTS AT 6@ PERCENT;
1 AGENT AT 85 PERCENT.

END.

”
ww
wr)

W.88296 Docid:32989628 Page 273.


a
a
:

Assoc. 2Nit, anon
Dep-A.D-22mM ae |
, Ts

NROO! AQ CODE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
10:55AM URGENT 3-36-75 PD COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
TO: DIRECTOR MAR 2 6 1975
14
FROM: / ALBUQUERQUE TELETYPE

ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
REBUTEL, MARCH 24, 1975. a
ALBUQUERQUE HAS ONE SUPERVISOR WHO SPENDS
25 PER CENT OF HIS TIME IN THE SUPERVISION OF INTERNAL
SECURITY MATTERS AND THREE AGENTS wHO WORK THESE MATTERS
ON A PART-TIME BASIS WITH 20 PER CENT, 40 PER CENT AND 40
PER CENT OF THEER TINE DEVOTED TO THESE MATTERS.
ONE OF THES ABOVE AGENTS SPENDS TEN PER CENT OF
“HIS TINE <ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS.
THERE ARE 15 RESIDENT AGENTS EACH OF WHO WORK
APPROXIMATELY FIVE PERSENT OF THEIR TIME ON INTERNAL
SECURITY MATTERS

END er oe 6
JTG FBIHQ CLR Pes bee
eT WH
ad ol
tie


¢ Assoc. Dix, oe
’ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTICATIOT! 3 | Dep..A.D-Adm,.
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION =—— | Dep-A.D-Iny,__—

{ Asst. Dir.:

Adrain. ---—rmiee §
: Comp. Syst. _
f Ext: Affairg
f Files & vom, .. ¢
¥ Gen. Inv, ._..... an

ROBE AX CODE MAR 2 6 arp

Ss20PM NITEL MARCH 26, 1975 VANe AG an

“2 , TELETYPE i E
ent...

TOs REAU CATINs BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTIONS) Inspection |

Inti, ameveroan |

PROM: ALEXANDRIA (88-131) Lab-ratury woo.
Plane & Eval, ]

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES, ni oto
RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL SAC"S, MARCH 24, 1975. ecb ns a
Director Sc0'7 rae

ALEXANDRIA, HAS ONE SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL
“SECURITY (1S) AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE (C1) MATTERS.
APPROXIMATELY SIXTY PERCENT OF HIS TIME 1S SPENT ON Is

MATTERS AND FIVE PERCENT ON CI MATTERS.
ALEXANDRIA AGENTS PERFORMING 1S WORK AND PERCENTAGE
GF TIME SPENT 18 aS FOLLOWS:

3 SPECIAL AGENTS NINETY PERCENT -
2 SPuCrAL AGENTS SIXTY-FIVE PERCENT
4 SPECIAL AGENTS FIFTEEN PERCENT
5 SPECIAL AGENTS TEN PERCENT
ALEXANDRIA HAS THREE AGENTS ASSIGNED TO CI WORK AS
FOLLOWS :
1 SPECIAL AGENT TEN PERCENT
2 SPECIAL AGENTS FIVE PERCENT
END. ,

PiR-

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 275


NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 276

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

NR@Gi AN CODE MAR 2.5 1975 | Files &
te | Noent
3245 PM 3-25-75 NITEL MAB Lee
” TEL j YPE mr. =

TOs DLRECTOR, FBI (ATIN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SBCTION)] L-; . 7

4 f i Plow a : Eval
FROM: = SAC, ANCHORAGE i é | SP ITY, ae

() } Legal Coun.
7 Telephone Rm .-

| Director See’y —
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. —

RE: BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL OFFICES DATED MARCH 24, 1975.
ANCHORAGE INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS
ARE SUPERVISED BY THE SAC, WHO SPENDS 15 PERCENT OF HIS TIME
ON THE FORMER AND > PERCENT OF HIS TIME ON THE LATTER GATEGORY.
THERE ARE 3 AGENTS WORKING INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS. THEY
SPEND 46 PERCENT, 5, PERCENT, AND 2 PERCENT OF THEIR TIME,
RESPECTIVELY »-0 ou THES CATEGORY. ONE OF THE 3 AGENTS SPENDS 16
PERCENT OF HIS TIME ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS.

ND
Al
eS
of .
TJT FBI waSH DG HOLD gg
BO" 29>
Sg
were

Assoc. Dir,

is Dep.-A.D-Adm,___
. a Dep-A.D-Inv.__. fi
it FEDERAL GUREAU OF WWESTCAiON Asst Dins
A ACT“,
" weooe aT CODED OMMUNICATIONS SECTION a
"5244 PM URGENT MARCH 26, 1975 LAP MAR 2.6 975
To: DARECTOR, FBI TELETYPE aan

FROM: ATLANTA (100-0) ix
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.
RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL SACS, MARCH 24, 1975.
FOLLOWING IS BREAKDOWN OF ATLANTA AGENT PERSONNEL PRESENTLY
WORKING ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS ALSO
INCLUDING IN THIS AREA ALL OF CLASSIFICATIONS GENERALLY REGARDED

AS SECURITY WORK AND EXTREMIST WORK, AS WELL AS THOSE RELATING TO SEE
ta ope
EXPLOSIVES AND INCENDIARY DEVICES: ae
Ua 9
POSITION PER CENT OF TIME a8
ae
BS
1 SAC WORK ING 5 ane
t - mI
eo
1 aSaAC " 3 nae uN
y ie a>
{ SUPERVISOR " 75 . ES
ag
1 SUPERVISOR " 3 nN
3 HEADQUARTERS CITY AGENTS WORKING 100 .
Re)
4 Ww ww Ail Ww 90 N
2 Ww cid id id 80
t ww w vw Ww 50
1 wW bl Aid we 40
2 oid w Ww id t 20

ws _ Date, o ; - 5
Neve Supe eles Cawhe Me pines, BT 22 ta, Fela,” fen tt,

l- im 4 A => , * ; wo
Canto e%e ra 3%, Y2Y7S | Ha wf caqeet press ee
A Beye oe by Los CL mat irr Ser
f

27 bref ey
4,

bee e

Dill


uy

PAGE TWO . AT 100-0

POSITION PER CENT OF TIME
3 HEAD QUARTERS CITY AGENTS WORK ING 10
3 RESIDENT AGENTS " 10
4 RESIDENT AGENTS . 6
bom ee " 3

i " < . 2

THE FOLLOWING CLASSIFICATIONS WERE INCLUDED IN ARRIVING AT THE

ABOVE COMPUTATION:

. “a a a “a ie i a 6 en t Be :
+414 6 &, & 9% 9%, 100, 162, 165, 108, 109, 110, Tit,

u . _ wv ° al
112, 113, 117, 134, 155, 157, 18, 40, 144, 1%6, AND £85.
EWN D

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 278

., NRWOT AT CODE

9:46 Pit NITEL M4

TOs DIF

FRUMs ATLANT

RE ATLANTA TELETYPE TO DIRECTOR, MARCH 26, 1975.

A

(18-9)

FEDERAL BUNEAU OF INVESTIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
MAR 2% 1975 j

CH 27, 1975 Stay ery

TOR, FBI

b Asst, Diez
RO Add: 7.

Gist. APEARS som

Ie +

I Peleph ne It
Dire

UNDER PER CENT OF TIME COLUMN, "IS" STANDS FOR INTERNAL SECURITY

AND "CI" STANDS FOR COUNTERINTELLIGENCE,.

POSITION

1 SAC

1 ASAC

1 SUPERVISOR
{ SUPERVISOR

L HEADQUARTERS CITY AGENT

Loo
Looe
Looe
Loo
(oo
Coo
foo.

ALL THPORMATION coral

we

ngele

eee fe S13 ee SSIETED 14: Att

DATOS

BY

NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page #79

WORKING

PER CENT OF TIME

1s cl
A _
2 L
a rca
45 36
an GB
198 g
65 15
88 29
96 a
96
85 5
73 $5
§@ 29g
BLA
7! io

f Don. A ‘Delay.

sve §

i Creo Cytron

. QP & Gone oe FS
AA ( | |

_ & ‘if L
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

SEY once


, PAGE TwO

PUSITION

l

ww

AT 19@-@

ail

96 Docld:32989628 Page 280

1 HEADQUARTERS CITY AGENT

WORKING

w

Is
ST]
20
G
3
2g
16
2
3
10
16

Se wo A & A wW

PER CENT OF TIME

cl
-@
AD
48
{5

Ke

PaGE THREE AT i8@-@

IN CONSIDERING ABOVE COMPUTATIONS, THE FOLLOWING CLASSIFICATIONS
WERE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION UNDER INTERNAL SECURITY HEADING: 3,
14, S41, 95, 198, 117, 134 CINFORMANTS) 157, 163, 178, 176, 185. THE
FOLLOWING CLASSIFICATIONS WERE CONSIDERED UNDER COUNTERINTELLIGENCE

HEADING s Bs S4y G5, O75 1825 1855 183, LBD, 11Bsy Alls 1125 115, 134
(ASSETS).

EW OD
HOLD FOR 5 MORE

NW 85296 Docld:32955628 Page #01


NW 88296.
jo

Dochd:32969628 Pa

. a

’ : 2, oe ,
Do Be
. ms
vo g

7 . ‘ 3 :

‘ a . .

ry ay : a

ea
bby.

?

~ te ;
a ‘ ao an
wee

&. . °
iw _
a . 2d
ee ,
== i,

ae . :

wo :


“ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Srey

if
FROM BaLTINORE 66= NEW

co COMMUNICATIONS SECTION ; Sn ae

NR G14 BA CODE oN pet Toe
HAR 2 5 IB (sain, |

los1apH NITEL 3/65/75 JAN ot. oot
70 DIRECTOR” cATTN: BUDGET asTELEINOE. SECTION? fro
Rui heD, 18. =

Loo
SENATE. ‘SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

tf

Acme ane

nr
CRE BUREAU NITEL TO ALL OFFICES DATED MARCH 24, 1975, .

BALTIMORE HAS TWO SUPERVISORS AND 33 AGENTS DEVOTED Fumi trMm=——

Direetor Cee’y _

|

ag en ot bel bet Gy tet be}
‘ % F

TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND INTERNAL SECURITY CIS). TWENTY
DEVOTE 198 PER CENT OF THEIR TIME TO IS MATTERS. THIRTEEN AGENTS
DEVOTE 75 PER CENT TO CI MATTERS AND 25 PER CENT TO IS MATTERS.
THE SAC'S OVERALL SUPERVISION INCLUDES 29 PER CENT OVER IS AND CI
MATTERS.

END

~
me]

» Dochd:32989628 Page 283


. SOE ml mad t
! MAT sO Wat gated
‘ ° ae Aw Af ’
wil Joh na ae
: sR
“At, CYNGNT TT os tebe |
, C iftpo°* SS 8.4 T rh corenen ne
é
, mre gas eo olgte re
i
:
merpetiree se om aks ay Pear LET On TA A a aan
Po ay OS TTt OSL Ose re oP GEE basi ol
Pha Pa ar Te TS ue * LOOT. yer ME AN LOC TT AS
comm ER CO PTT OTE FANT DT ae el Ta ye CTD Woe Ur
\ one AE Tey TES WOT EMYT CIGRT to tein Ma ag civ
. « . - oo _ . - tage. . ~~ ene . Sen Show,
e 7 iT? Taw ao asw ott eB ned 7 TT Lo ae OT tietise
I. SD. heim tt Dl A rae de We ed wea
er rhe
nal x oh
mr =e ve
mem
Sim
~<
ori

L2-Ue3BIS- Se

. NW 88296 Docid:32989678 Page 784


NW 88296 Docld:37989628 Page 285

owees
Assoc. Dir. .

« PODERAL BUREAU GF INVESTIGATION -Dep.-A.D.-Adm._
. COMMUNICATIONS SECTION Z Aste
Aa a

AR 22 5 1075 eee

NR 002 BH CODE ao

241 PM-NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 D&S
TOs DIRECTOR

Te wu ee
Trou. .
Le tery
Pha. & Eval ow
Sp . Ing.
i
Legal © un.
Feaaiae Rm ~~

FROM: BIRMINGHAM (66-2204)

ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECT ION
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

REBUTEL, 3/24/74, REGARD ING PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL
SECURITY CIS) AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE (CD MATTERS.

BIRMINGHAM HAS NO AGENT PERSONNEL ASSIGNED FULL-TIME TO THESE
MATTERS. FOLLOWING REPRESENT PERCENTAGES OF AGENT TIME:

AGENT - = 1S PERCENTAGE Cl PERCENTAGE

A 95 0

B 50 40

C 80 0

D 40 10

E 60 0

F 35 15

G 5 | 10

H 0 25

I 30 30

J 25 0

K (SUPERVISOR ) 40 20 -
END i Pa


" , “ CAO OSe EU GAEMID EE Ged
7 ‘ rod . Coty yo ' , . a
~ : “t : * ’ : ‘ :
5 mo, ; moe Ty ' Ok TOWER E cet Vyoe Sa 0.8 DISTT eavts
ae = SOLAMETE ‘oO STVIT. G9 Tos tal PTaw te
, Peay ’ t 1 , . 4 ; , - ‘ ' :
. : 7 : . ont ot ‘ ale we ow 7 . t le eta Yow
‘ Dye oD OT Ue baa te Qe B. DTRAODL eg APN SNG ged PLZ
‘. my wn TATA a J) oe Jt SUNT AITONIS! fue Td 6 MTUEES:
' Soe Th oe ' : ‘ “: ‘
' Vie ea Ma TG DT eI Deer ts ou wea Gea ed Ba io4 ey wosel ails
1 a . , . . \ ' aw on ' 7 ‘ay . .
my STANT PAHOA OD BE TANRY PS BATES ifice | tabi tan
. rs ‘ 7 ua) '
. qeeqitge omgor ee
, sod Ate gs Boyle do, 34 ol Om yoweN
, ! : ‘ oe roe
. Oe as 1g _ ee 2
' oo ; . ’ t ; a 47 ,
. poe uo . , se"
Boy, , Op, vs , ‘ , oud
oe . roe Mt ' ‘ . a
7 1 vos ' mee .
roy : . ' iy ' t sot ' Ca . a, 5 wo
: : . . , ’
' ‘ . , ' te
7 ud Oe. aa é
: ! “y ‘ on ‘ ' . ;
. , . ” 1, as ‘
7 wy , ' ‘ Pia, ' %
oJ , t It “ae te ‘ '
'
edt! : "Be "
. '
, a>! ; ‘ < te
‘ i A
: ' 5 oa) , r ‘ .
, x 1 ni C. Wa oe . . at
Ged Po 2
ALS ,
= de® a
TTC ke on ue. {
naishas. Bepke ee
WOlosdes Lo . oy
a yas . a es 1,
ue Co git ye f
oa
no
bba- [4395-56

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 286


(EDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGAR OI
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

NRO17~=—=s«BS CODE MAR 251075 7
. blige
6358 ra eee MARCH 259184506?

\

FF a
TO DIRECTO NX
fj deci *y i i fan
FROM BOSTON § (66-82) ; |

array pct AND ACCOUNTING SECTION bod eM ’
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

REBUNITEL 3/24/75.

BOSTON HAS TWO SUPERVISORS AND TWENTY-ONE AGENTS, ALL
ASSIGNED FULL TIME, TO INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS. IN ADDITION,
TWELVE RESIDENT AGENTS ARE WORKING THE EQUIVALENT OF THREE
AND GNE-HALF AGENTS FULL TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS.

BOSTON HAS ONE SUPERVISOR AND TEN AGENTS ASSIGNED
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS FULL TIME. IN ADDITION, ELEVEN
RESIDENT AGENTS ARE WORKING THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE AND

ONE-HALF AGENTS FULL TIME ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS.
BUREAU SHOULD “NOTE THAT THE SAME RESIDENT AGENTS, WITH
ONE EXCEPTION, WHO ARE aSSIGNED INTERNAL SECURITY

MATTERS, ARE ALSO ASSIGNED COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS.
END

NW 88296 Docid:37989628 Page 287

Asst. Dire
Adain -———
Corn, Cert —— |
text, Affelra —— |
Fil) C vom. — I
Gen. Lat eee +

Labane ty — -
Plon. & Eval. —
Spee. Inv. —— \
rainng ——- |
Legal Coun. ——- j
Melephone Rm
Director Sec'y —-


‘ . 4
yo
an ;
’ ’
_ -
. 9
J h ”
+ .
ye
, .
So,
soy oF
a

M
‘ y
foo
, toe
? ys
+
.~ i? ,
4
4 .
toe!
we aa
:
. >
soy ot
5
pe .
1 , .
3
‘ ,
s
: y,
oan . ,
1 ’
, ‘
w 2

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 288 b2-| 6.395 -SC _ | _ -

4
-“f

bs

eee

, i
. «
' .
r,
. ,
Soy bg Li Lawn:
:
.
woo oo
Tielun wierd di

v4

+

yon

. ' . ,
eePy owes ols Bree &U, ton webb

.

.
Qhawihs baw .
’ A .

+

:

-

Newt dete ph we

Vk ah Ee Coke wk a red!

4

wud OS Vel e Np

tee BLUM Ce.

'
,

mo

’

'

1

@etin bh heen

eo!
het db ee

nod
tus bite as

,

'

ad

1

wn

toe ‘ '
Vewdderdd eae hades tas

ry AN ww Me eb bbe ten '

4

’

esatidatae Tg dnt vee tie ded ot gee

Pa tba ei ytd Ube

seat a dae il, Vrat ay we SM ate bee be

Hy
,

?

Cin tu)

di

'

sg . i a ' . "
eee td hdd aebtiodbad GL ees Bid. abe es
' . , 1 . . ° , : ?

,

3

. t
worry v cer u ety

wale D eng s

‘ '

a ASU il

»

:

pong
re

ny

. nd

eee ~
ent

. whe ha Nid tes

. . . : t .
1 . . wo ;
we Wb ete badeden be db Ve came a b deatelees Lite mde We dave nine
: . ,

1
bh .

1

Lin woge,, ema, bore d. \ Ldgy or:

wad tL Lidia bes

va ‘i " wha Cras dl we haya db
¢

“eye wm ia te Aber

oat

ras ‘ .
we RANE gd Oe paaihywe Se, dares bye

Re ia Bre a BX
eet bese re beets Poems

, i : . Mae > c . é
ses oe : . tt a
wb ee ad. wee ded ube we wt! ok oh Sted ved AOL. rs Mes
+ 1 : oe 7 = wan
= ies
ga be ee Ba atte bee Seay eee bet ae Liber wiertiiary
. . : : ' , , a oe .
. too ce woe an i oe
ha My af : yon et o . an we ok
be dee OC Give dnd Cabs fon 2 ee gut bb eae) ee
‘ r . . *
. , . . a , —_
nC . 7 I io rar ce ro .
wo ee ty bee Db he Um eee et nd Select metre @ bdim st by
. , y ? . . .
, ' . .?
" Nadoe
‘ ; , ; ” 7 ates
wo ony fd . . .
' , ‘ ' oo: ' .
, , , . .
' :
’ . 1’ a
, oe r) ' . * ro
of ey ‘ . '
' s "Tr 1 ate .
woe i : . roe .
ae ‘ r 1 ' + » ot ! ot
. , en .
,
Loa ‘ _
. 7 . .
. . .: a . t soe 4
. : : 1 ,
1 , ,
7 . .
, , ' 1


A NW'S8296 Docld:32989628 Page 289

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION ; =

MAR 2,6 1975 ——<_

mu

i

NROOL BU CODE

Pale _
4:04 PM URGENT/MARCH 26,1975 TRR Por ~

TO DIRECTOR

FROM FFALO  KYYXXX(6 6 NEW

ATIN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

REBUTEL DATED MARCH 24, 1975.

BUFFALO DIVISION HAS TWO SUPERVISORS AND 28 SPECIAL AGENTS
ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS BUT
NOT NECESSARILY ON A FULL TIME BASIS,

FOLLOWING IS A BREAKDOWN OF FIELD AGENT PERSONNEL ASSIGNED

TO THESE AREAS ON FULL TIME BASIS: -

INTERNAL a
y Ls
SECURITY COUNTER INTELLIGENCE oS
S
SAC | 0 0 Sere
As AC (6) ie] 6 ran rY
wee f
SUPERVISORS 0 0 “Se
9
SPECIAL AGENTS 6 0
[>
Z
Hf)
in


PAGE TwO BU S6-NEW

IN ADDITION TO ABOVE, COMPUTATION OF ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE
OF TIME SPENT BY OTHER AGENT PERSONNEL ASSIGNED THESE MATTERS
WOULD REPRESENT EQUIVALENT OF FOLLOWING NUMBER OF FULL TIME

PERSONNELS
INTERNAL

SECURITY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
SUPERVISORS = -- 1 1/2
SPECIAL AGENTS *~ 71/2 5
GRAND TOTALS:
SUPERVISORS i 1/2
SPECIAL AGENTS 13 172 5
END

NW 68296. Docld:32989628 Page 290


ot
“30
“ie *
at

rs
cya * :
rn oh
.
. ‘
st
oN
. '
was Sy
' ‘ ve
ne
. are oft
: : cans us 4
. . tox ony
. t wo .
we te
re as i an
eo * ' _
* . . note, . -
a : al ’ : * ;
. : : ate
. tw
‘ . .
1. oo : 1%
. boo. .
. xo se
oon Y ‘ . .
: “ Ys
oe . ye
- . : : .
t o
‘ - .
: tek , t
1

Hite 7 us PATS

° :

. REGEIVED
» FELETYPE UNIT

,
'
t

4
ry
4

‘
.y
2
a
:
'
‘
'
‘
1
C
s
4
ry
'
at
ja
4

wee le . a .

.
—
v
' ”
.
t +
{
aNLT
;
at
.
3
—_

-_ . Udy
x ho . - wet . oa

_ ° ce . et _ a ; aS
a _ . a) can Lot . ” .
8 _ eo ho a . . . . “
te a

327989628 Page 291

i

NiW 88296 Docld


FEDCIM, BURGSY OF HvESTIgATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
«4

“4

any

Tener vps’

9-135 QP PM NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 TDS
TO DIRECTOR

20M, BUTTE
FROM,

QNR @26 BI PLAIN

ATTENTIONS BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION.

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.
REBUNITEL TO ALL SACS, MARCH 24, 1975.

SECURITY ‘MATTERS SUPERVISED BY ASAC FIVE PERCENT OF HIS TIME.
ONE HEADQUARTERS AGENT HANDLES FIFTY PERCENT OF HIS TIME AND ONE

AR 26 io L-7

im i i 4
/ Paty Cy” s
Pa Mt

N49

RA TEN PERCENT OF HIS TIME, NO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE WORK BUTTE

DIVISION.
END1 °
v

FBIHQ FLO FR THREE TELS TKS AND CUL.

| _ NW 88296 Docid:32389628 Page 292

Assoc. Dit, -——- jf}
Dep-A.D.-Adtt. ae
Dep-A.D.-Inv.— &

Asst. Div:
Admin.

Comp. Svat. —— jj
Ext. Affairs ~~ fi
Files & Com

Gen. Inv. —~——
Jdert. ce cenremneee fl
Inspection aw
Sntell.
Lebovet ty ——~
Plon. & Eval, —
Spee. Inv. -—~-—
Training
1 Legal Coun, -—
\ Telephone Rm.
LaMractor Sec’y


NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 293

rk re a oes a
e ore a pee ee Oe re an rene
yom as Cae a re) ee
. * t ~ — . a sf * o » . “Y L eat
eos a es ee t cpm cma
“an MEP Pe be ot rn a a a ee

ty the fm ay ge

ak ee ree ane “e

“¥

bod- 116 39S~- Sle

Pr eee

BERG
is oes a

NN adA13
aM

4
5

Ll

A

Fae


Assoe. Dir, ee |!

poses peek Adm — :
ep. = 5 :\ rn
——
= Asst. Din:
Adi im.
FEDERAL CUaEAY OF INVESTIGATION Com. $ wt \
a“ COMMUNICATIONS SECTION Bvt Atta =I
NR @G29 CE CODED 7 > & Com
QOS
5235 PM NITEV MARCH 25, 1975 KCL Wk ote
[lama ee >
TO DIRECTOR °
tA a Pe
FROM @HARLOTTE (108-90) rs
LIDGE } L
cal Coun, ..
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. Teohone a fF

Diveetor See’y —. [i

REBULET MARCH 24, 1975.

CHARLOTTE DIVISION HAS ONE SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED FULL TIME To
SECURITY MATTERS, NO OTHER SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL HANDLE SECURITY.
THERE ARE 3 HEADQUARTERS AGENTS ASSIGNED FULL TIME SECURITY
MATTERS AND ONE ADDITIONAL HEADQUARTERS AGENT ASSIGNED 75 PER
CENT TO SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS. ONE RESIDENT AGENT IS ASSIGNED
75 PER CENT TO SECURITY MATTERS, 4 ADDITIONAL RESIDENT AGENTS
ARE ASSIGNED 56 PER CENT TO SECURITY MATTERS, AND 9 ADDITIONAL
RESIDENT AGENTS ASSIGNED FROM 5 TO 15 PER CENT OF THEIR WORK
IN SECURITY CLASSIFICATIONS,
NO SUPERVISORY OR AGENT PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO COUNTER-

ee
INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM WHICH WAS DISCONTINUED PER BUREAU _..s' seh
Ter SOT S
INSTRUCTIONS IN 1971. seo
END - “pe

Nefes_ ‘a Yr (7s: Seco rity Sy peer hi come Tete; eho! ioe ty
a% am
Con Yowte ‘not 2 AYA : Th 75 duel The. of Fey 2 Me bo Of C2 g
Courter ted, 1G Can OR Pre PO, at foe Ly eIehe, - cuits "ed

toa Ana, the eff sorrel corte tect Mit} Wo7
oy ae

pi

NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 294

’
1 . ‘ .
yo :
ad '
tos +
. : a
oy 7
: a 1
7” fa a
at
r .?
ry 1 G
G .
ta Pra 3
ay ‘
%,
‘ Ween ae ky -
a
iy .
iH &
St
we
co oot :
t :
“y
*
= us
'
‘ ! -
“, aa
wee foe
“ot
’
>
2
to
. , . ’
?
,
;
1 ot
‘

1

:
uy
: .
+
4 t t
.
1
'
: 1‘
n
?
’ .
ss

YTD “uy 4g

re Resdeektalt teat)
ee

Hs a

¥

: .
“HATE Bde nk
. os

rie oe

Beal dd

Wey UbTL 1aea. fuete

anew

wme Slate

:
. ; ' ' poosy
Maas
‘ ;
a
’ + '
of 2
.
2 ;
, '

" oer nem, Ls Dyer: ’
* ANTE SIT
| ‘

A ‘
' 1

IL caNerTT

ooce '

sperm ors a

LIU OID:
Lied

Se eaqee

eae
Mejor

°
ater. Coy

Poe,
ti

ag. TVROS

(2

reg

pine

ct

eTeL ge

seat! 1 Hinins
reo TOSS, 27

“yt I

Spe a OF

aye

Ne eg

&

eR,

TL

=e

ie

beater

-

al

4

#9 Ge n

a

MT ow

est
1

ae

IT9

SPT Ant

fh -

ge T ng

rite

o

"sap TT vit Yas’ -

~

“
dow

e

‘i

o

no

eth.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

MAR 27 (975 |
NRO95 CE CODE reer Inspection — |
5:26 PMNITEL MARCH 27, 1975 KG. Plan & Bal

Spee. Inv.

To Daygcror food: if (CA a
FROM ofaRLOTTE (158-4 mee POT | Melptone, Re — |
erent tone BUDGET AM ACCOUNTING SECTION
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

REBUTEL MARCH 24, 1975, AND CHARLOTTE TEL MARCH 25, 1975.

CHARLOTTE OFFICE HAS ONE SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO

BOTH SECIRITY AM COUNTER INTELLIGENCE MATTERS. ONE HEADQUARTERS
AGENT IS ASSIGNED 54 PER CENT TO COUNTERINTELL IGENCE MATTERS,

AND A SECOND HEADQUARTERS AGENT DEVOTES 25 PER CENT TO COUNTER-
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS, TWO RESIDENT AGENTS ARE ASSIGNED 25 PER
CENT TO COUNTER INTELL IGENCE MATTERS AND TWO ADDITIONAL RESIDENT
AGENTS AREAS ST@ NED BETWEEN 5 TO 1@ PER CENT TO COUNTERINTELL I-
GENCE MATTERS. OTHER RESIDENT AGENTS ASSIGNED COUNTERINTELL IGENCE
MATTERS WHEN NEED ARISES, HOWEVER, SO EXACT PERCENTAGE AVAILABLE
SINCE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS GREATLY FL UCT UATE,

END


| NW 88296

Docld:32989628 Page 297

y

.
hy .
>
ees
good _s

a) (oe

OTA T AQ ith
Uh, yi , . a

‘ a
ny eye

Cols AGriata

: : >
ro.
. "or
_¢ . « a
oor .
. 1 r
. . ,
toe ‘ . -
. cone
. 1
" t
7 . sue
wee ae ee sore
. ars
. tat
: tee, ror, ’
— am oe 1 . -
wee ee gee swe
presse tae wt 7
pee a . rn
oaay i
s
. '
ne aia oo
nae ne *
; t
ree aon ee oe
' '
an oS , re ae?
: arn
: ‘ .
a .
wore ees te Lone
noeey . ol .
takes . can ‘
ie a ees fe
seen “ r woe
e :
- a
‘ .

b2-NUWBIS-S

oR . - .
ATT _ ot . . ,
yyy ve : . . " . :
-" ae ’ ' : St soto .
”
: "
a oe s ' ain . .
‘ . , ' oe ’
‘ a my ret “ ,
7 - 2h of + . o
. an , it " '
: , % : ’
- 4 : . - * moos ,
" » neon . .
. ' noel . :
: “yong it nn oo a 7 - yo .
: . Sete an ' , :
. 4 ae ata aX nr
re , ' é aren :
: ‘ .
' tog
a a a a 7 |
. ‘
: wt ce ow 4
: : . sae ' 1
a ” gee lakes, .
toe . ve . .
. , yon . - ? .
a Ne sy fp te ene me woe t ee a an
oe : "
! toy . ' , ‘ " ,
. 7 wos "ye wohoe ss r 5 uo
. . o Le ao . . ’,
ate - . ; \ , : .
aes rs wees Lote soy ra :
7 . . noo
0 + ,
, seve
\ pein gets ep ee ey he J
: ' . : >
J tl a hia nae ee Res thet
a ' . 1 song = ate .
. , r s o4 , ,
we ~ ow eo ’ A, ee “oa :
. . ann al ‘ on
. , . Men . .
. . soma
. nN Vota iw - cage res aatee 7
ve a wee eS te! sone ’ .
wow : ‘ ‘ ° ores ,
. * nes + ot ne Ce .
. oS —o
= ae
fom tM 4 eome eth e ar wo ao
i . . aT went .
ery ele ae ners, Cote eo -
. + * .
rye ee er ee
eo ® 7 . :
. é . 7
ue tr apa 8 “ oops cre moat
’ ts .

bp _


j Assoc. Dir.

Dep-A.D.Inv___
Asst. Dir:

4 Admin, .

i Comp. Syst.
{ Ext. Affairs __
§ Files & Com.
i Gen. Inv.
4 Ident. |
Be Insporti xy
q Int 2h
Laser ny
Plan. & Eval _

FEDERAL OLLIE AL OF INYESHArIN

COMMIRICATIONS SECTION
NRG26 CG CODE WAR LA ISPS
S1OPM NITEL 3-25-75 RWR rene od
TO DIRECTOR

FROM CHICAGO KL: wa

3 !
ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION “hi

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES,

x

Training

Telephone Rm
Director See'y

REBUTEL, MARCH 24, 1975, TO ALL SAC’S.

THE FOLLOWING 1S A BREAKDOWN OF AGENT TIME IN THE CHICAGO
DIVISION SPENT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND INTERNAL SECURITY
MATTERS $

SAC: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS, 20 PERCENTs INTERNAL
SECURITY, 10 PERCENT.

ASAC? COUNTERINTELLIGENCE, 25 PERCENT; INTERNAL SECURITY,
20 PERCENT.

SUPERVISORS: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE, FOUR, FULL TIME;
INTERNAL SECURITY, ONE, FULL TIME, ONE, 58 PERCENT. (THE
OTHER FIFTY PERCENT OF ONE SUPERVISOR'S TIME IS SPENT ON
EXTREMIST MATTERS «)

AGENTS: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE, 76, FULL TIME (INCLUDES 16
AGENTS ASSIGNED FULL TIME COUNTERINTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE) 3

3
gee, “Ss
yhoo IG
ac EE aC “pes ie
ae B ar J
pecagel ay

NW 88296 Dochd:329696028 Page £95

| Dep-A.D-Adm__ |

are ete

sn tenes

¢ Spee. Inv, .

Legal Coun. ~


PAGE TWO

INTERNAL SECURITY, 28, FULL TIME.
IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, 18 AGENTS ARE ASSIGNED FULL
TIME TO EXTREMIST MATTERS.

THIS REPRESENTS A TOTLE OF 114 SA’S ASSIGNED SECURITY
WORK EXCLUSIVE OF SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL.

END.

PLS ACK FOR TWELVE

vy ak

NEED-A RERUN-OF -UR-NRTC"HAVE0.N_.OVERLLNE

| NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 2990


at
OT

VIET.
B44

roca
ONE Ta

M1,

OU

4
poe
y

, . : i 2 ' 8
' 4 . 4 a a s ’ : - ft . ’ t
oo ", eFUET Luge ghS g ¥TLU9I2 ages]
i wo .
' ’ . ‘ . oh a, ae Cal green 7 ra
J a 03 oniet se zany atwaaa Sb eFGHE ONT. OT LIT IOWA
a 7 so : . vy , an a
. . Ha eQedT rat. TIDTg7KNg
cory 1 , * 4 . ‘
- . ' yrnavaae aaah, 3°73) Att 10 A470 ota. glagaina a2
et .
co ‘, 4490602999 vaoery 23% 2 WALA
a t
, ' t - , .
: . a 7 ‘ ; . 4 ce
ty : at , it. t : , say cam:
Mg Re Py ania a
. my a : aos mm ” ms
; , . . aw a . . : . so art la
' my ’ : ' ‘2 Orn %
A ta aan) " 1 . Te
, , 1 2 sory ; , ‘oo aia
' ut . + , a ’ ' 2 << fe
red Dot os EY By
' , : .¥
. . , 7 roast ’ . ot ry
. f ' . 5 Ho. . whe
' ‘ , fe, ' : ' toe ' a
an - " yoo ’ 5, 7 : .
5 . -*4 . J moo " , an) ; .
* 1 ‘0 , 1 1 ; ® 1 '
. . 3 : . pheoe , hoe . fd
rel ts " ‘ toe ' ' 4
to vt ‘ . . Tay
1" 2 . t . ' , " t 7 ' ' , - .
rouge . “ my 4, a i, ‘
. 17 oa 1 oy ' 1 ' . , '
‘ : Ms it , ‘ ' Poy! ! * Paar) ' voy
, . ' t ; 1 . yet of
< a) te ‘ , yo : \
. “ot tao . .
' > ' ' lo ' 3
‘ a . > os , ‘ ' ,
’ . y * .
, : Ver . -
; asia 0 Sa Sua SEen aul 4
st ! - . ' ' ot a so ;
' : eit 1 o yo . ‘ ‘ ' ,
* Pa rte . ' : " . '
. ; ° ‘ 1 ' os 4 . '
. “i , 1 i i yo . to °
. ‘ ' v, mn a4! . yo
. : hoa i: a ' , a ;
, . , . . . i.
os an a re “0 Pe so :
foaoge ! a mo , : . : vor
‘ a . ' ia : ay .
. vy wg . , C — |S . , '
b2+)}|6396-S6 .
” . an _.o4 a

NW'88296 -Docld:32989628 .Rage' 300
3 ‘Dock

i981 at

Fy

Dep -A.D-Acri

nn “ : 4 Dep-A.D-Inv.—_—
po nn
L NR 9@4 CI CODE MAR 2 6 1975
TASPM NITEL 3/25/75 KOD ow
TD nego TELETYPE ———
FROM CINCINNATI (195-7938) tb be te a
ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION Rian, Be sae ee

Legal C.un. ..--
Felephone Rm ~
Pireetor See’y —..

ay
Ay
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ee

REBUNITEL TO ALL SACS, MARCH 24,1975.
FOLLOWING ISBREAKDOWN OF AGENT PERSONNEL TIME BEING EXPENDED IN
CINCINNATI DIVISION OM INTERNAL SECURITY (IS) AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE

MATTERS (CIM):

ONE SUPERVISOR
ONE SUPERVISOR
SIX AGENTS

TwO AGENTS
FOUR AGENTS
ONE AGENT

ONE AGENT

ONE AGENT
TWO AGENTS
ONE AGENT

SAC AND ASAC = NONE

Is
65 PERCENT
_53 PERCENT
“100 PERCENT
8G PERCENT
6@ PERCENT
27 PERCENT
45 PERCENT
59 PERCENT
59 PERCENT
73. PERCENT

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 301

cil
@ PERCENT
36 PERCENT
"PERCENT
@ PERCENT
49 PERCENT
73 PERCENT
55 PERCENT
5 PERCENT
6 PERCENT

27 PERCENT


PAGE TWO CI 195-7838

Is

ONE AGENT 30 PERCENT
ONE AGENT 40 PERCENT
ONE AGENT 25 PERCENT
THREE AGENTS 10 PERCENT
ONE AGENT 1G PERCENT
SIX AGENTS 5 PERCENT
TWO’ AGENTS 2 PERCENT

FOUR AGENTS 5 PERCENT

END

REC 4 DBS FBIHQ@ CLR

NW 68296 Docld:32989628 Page 302

cI

5@ PERCENT
2@ PERCENT

25 PERCENT
@ PERCENT
25 PERCENT
5 PERCENT
8 PERCENT

@ PERCENT.


_ teogeyp Uear.
> —_ . ' 1
. ’ . , . I” ul « . .
7 oye te Tena Tes
. ThE se i .
‘ * - ° + ‘ ’ :
boo so , . 7 ~ . , , ge «
ee Tr arog ae rt
7 . _ oa , ce ‘ . . —_ . .
cow . ee . one mt, “ . . late _ . . .
Pay a :
. id . . wr aan . !

- . . ~ * 7 ' . ' as .
an : ote * a a 1 w ny
oe ‘ . foo an = mrantats Dan) n

“4 wh . . : RRR PSS remy
Qt
oe” ‘
yes oy ’
7
. a
' :
- '
. .
:
. '
. wen
“ .
. : ‘
' a Mey
'
- _ . « . 5 vat . ‘ " , uf
NW 88296 - Docld:32989628 Page 303 - . ' : :


Assoc, Dir,

ao 14 Dep.-A.D.-Adm,
Lt Dep.-A.D.-Iny,__
Ast. Dine
aan,
omp. Syst.
NR 985 CV CODE FEDERAL BUKEAU OF INVESTIGATION Ti sae _
S$
ror DIRECTOR HAR 2 5 975

FROM: CLEVELAND (66-5641) TALEYY PE
CONE PSENTIAL

Legal Coun,
ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION Pilephone Rm
ra irector Sool.
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. huidoh Oe
Uf
RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL SACS, MARCH 24, 1975. hey

CLEVELAND HAS THE FOLLOWING NUMBER OF AGENTS ASSIGNED
TO INTERNAL SECURITY WORK$ SAC NONE, ASAC NONE, SUPERVISORS
TWO, AGENTS 20. THE FOLLOWING NUMBER ARE ASSIGNED TO COUNTER-
INTELLIGNECE WORK 8 -SAC NONE, ASAC NONEs SUPERVISORS ONE,
AGENTS 16, THE THREE SUPERVISORS HANDLE SECURITY*TYPE
MATTERS EXCLUSIVELY »

CLEVELAND HAS UTILIZED PERCENTAGES OF AGENT'S TIME SPENT
IN THESE CATEGORIES WHERE APPLICABLE, ESPECIALLY IN THE
RESIDENT AGENCIES,

- ; TE.
END

HOLD FOR ONE
TJT FBI WASH D

NW 68296 Docld:32989626 Page 304

wot ay oe : _ | Bs, rerrs UO: Shy What

an Lote : , . f, ; te an : ' an -
a a ERNESNE IETEO mes _
a a oo cE yo 1 Ce a
| . A wate
: : o sertd@eae) aed ays aie
De a 7 mo eed ee 1% a Oo
oe SATIES TTTUODOA Gn Taacea ait oo
py : fa

ee eTATTIVLTDA EVUGOTATTT 60 BTTENION T9LIS

Oe fon RRR Se HOTT M2 dish GT aT BIBL, dadtuy + an
so Mapa 21 ioe fo aah ASTVONICT aT BAH Qungve go a

ht DS » phomryanauy <aics ‘Onan ley 208 | gun varus savant ‘a's
re | SARTEUSO. ae E225 Jae agen SyP7OME04 HT 3 74890 aovl

ee . _ = ne 4 ae
re HO p33 “yrOUEVARWS g His Me eeow’ on AG DELIEE
| a me m
re “Tavieyrtzlo 2a EAN GROaTVRIWS EME Se 67 RYAN
. ' 7 . —_ - o . ' . . : "a!
TAI BOLT 2° T4E a a8 MTYAIATA COSL ATTY uaa deasya ss

¢

‘Tf: sBS0KG B0RTTS. nv.

'¥,

-_ Rat wl YEALOg TS eBdAAD BIST 24 Jains B31 FAGST AD, ZOSHT

CO ar ot ae as tougan IEG 7

‘ oe . 3 t

oo eThit ST eS Ynosaie9 “BORK |g 22 wi cariieds ti."
ro . , 7

oo , aan nr . : mo sorts . ' :
re ‘ ue ' + ' . ? Gud '
‘ . . , 7 I : . ‘ " :
aceite ' ; vs ° ' : + ' 1 an 1 ,
1
' wor ee, ‘ * yO; . .
‘ . a : fr, . x , ! ve
ee : _ ; peui¥s ‘ “
; . . .: a “ee t . 7 . 480° Fe = 8 toi
; a . . - oe ; M 430° 204 Raat 7
: e, hay 2 : 2 . .
tae : .
. . a t . » +
_ . , . . . Boyett, , a t . oy de . r :
rr : fo : ay - ks G Hei I
ret Cte . a t . : at ’
Ton, , . ty * * . . . :
wot ate , ; . : A ty
a - Q ; , -
1’ ¥ t ’ . ’
’ '
' ' , ;
.
ts '
nyt
t
‘

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 305

EE

Assoc Dir. ————
Dep.-A.D.- Adie

EDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATICN | Dep-A.D,- INV. eee
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION LE | Dead.
KO A‘iain. >
= 1 Caan. Syct
MAR 2518/9 | Bob Affairs —
: ae, ‘Pye & Com —
ao ~ Aanf g 4 .
.

NR@ZS CO CODE = °

: Le 2 Vv
} pian & Eval —
} Spore. Inv. ——--
Training
Legal Coun, ——--
Telephone Rm. —~

7:0@PMEDT NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 WCA
TO DIREGTOR, FBI

ATJENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION

FROM COLUMBIA (195-NEW) Ay

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.
RE BUREAU NITEL TO ALL SACS, MARCH 24, 1975.
COLUMBIA PRESENTLY HAS ZERO AGENTS ASSIGNED COUNTER

INTELLIGENCE MATTERS. IN INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS COLUMBIA

HAS THE FOLLOWING NUMBER OF AGENTS AND SUPERVISORS ASSIGNED

THE FOLLOWING PERCENTAGES OF TIMEs

AGENTS = 1 = 75, 1 - 30, 3- 20,1 - 18,
- 3 - 5 OR LESS
SUPERVISORS 1 - 20
END.
DBS FBIHQ
CLR

| NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 306

ee ee ,


Ae OPEE eT HE

eee see
Soe

eidT Wt" oO

etTeL ght

wen gee seme pep cme re neq eres
i I “a rad aren at .* oan “ oo ry

. oe cae ee See, ne mmee oe
Do EY) SATE ie walne: Get atel ul

POM UTTE 4,

segs esas

wee Pn on
‘ GS wee a oe
“ -
,
ee - 1
. t
:
Lu .
’
: ‘ .
, ‘ > ' ;
ys 4 ‘ ot .
s . le
t i 5 .
* i . oe * . +,
‘ haat Y
a . . ‘
ul an .
. t
‘
: ‘
ao - !
fn vita .
Y 7 a oe
, rr .
rt s
' if
« 1 1 “
1 ' .
: i , .
. ‘ :
‘ ‘ ,
t t . '
’ , . '

oo ETEtO oA TE

fYW..00 TT.

ay
aan nae

eed)

: 2169 ov ns a
Dae ATE Taree ge
Tele gat Sued OT,
ATA. VOLT ATTA

e2ny apenga fae,
estar ees

pene es “oT

stents .

=

Mees SAO TL, Tat

mate

Ge

St ait MT
mh ERT OLIGO 4 Lat

xe

THSOA

ua nase co

owik
(as
ORLEA EaQ
-
‘ Em)
_
;
cy ~
;
-


4 FEDERAL QUGFAU OF INVESTIGATION } é

. COMMUNICATIONS SECTION =
> ANG
NRBBB DL CO MAR 2 6 19/5 |
L CODE Boo |
2 syn ee Comp Syst of
5244 PM NYTEL 826/75 DRH ie Ey WPS - Bat” ata -—
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI 2 heck Heb pcutbinn Gon, Inve
, f geet ul " Bee ___
FROM: DALLAS (1@5-NEW) GORY) Kea Tnsnestion ——
ATTN: INTD SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE Pa Bua
Spee. Inv.
ACTIVITIES. Traieny.

Leval Cur ~msen
Telephone Rm ow.
Divecter See’y a.

RE BUREAU TELETYPE, MARCH 24, 1975.

If} REPLY TO BUREAU REQUEST, THE DALLAS OFFICE HAS ONE
SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED TO WORK ON INTERNAL SECURITY (IS),
COUNTER INTELLIGENCE (CI), APPLICANT AND RELATED MATTERS.
FIFTY-FOUR PERCENT OF HIS TIME IS SPENT ON IS MATTERS AND
THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT ON CI MATTERS. THERE ARE SIX HEADQUARTERS
AGENTS HANDLING IS AND/OR CI MATTERS, THREE RESIDENT AGENTS
WORKING THE MAJORITY OF THEIR TIME ON BOTH IS AND CI MATTERS

AND EIGHT RESIDENT AGENTS WORKING A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THEIR
TIME IN THE IS AND CI FIELDS. DATA FOR SURVEY WAS OBTAINED
FROM THE FEBRUARY, 1975, CASE LOAD. THE NUMBER OF DALLAS
AGENTS WORKING IS, Cl OR BOTH AND THE PERCENTAGE OF THEIR
TIME SPENT IN THESE FIELDS IS SET OUT BELOWs


a
oe
*~
e

PAGE TWO DL 195-NEW

SAS 3X 1X 1X 1X
IS PERCE NT 186 34 63
CI PERCENT 1G = 6S i!

SAS ! i ! I
IS PERCENT 13 iS) 2
CI PERCENT 8

X RA AND HEADQUARTERS AGENTS ASSIGNED TO IS AND CI SQUAD.
END. -7

tow

io

NW 68296 Docld:32989626 Page 309

re | . 4 . . wo . wee .
1 . " ar . 5 * rg ys n Fy ety ene
ne ro es if anal | nan ™
“ ‘ai : : : . * ts < t ‘ cone
q 1 5 las - oe yy . fe ;
. . * , - . i 2 “ Tye
tO i yey . 1 Teo,
a * . ft ' . ’ .
" L ‘ : i 1 foo, . {
ct ’ . om oe ri : rn) . . ‘
4 . a oan eid ‘ eget
. . . : . ~ gt to, oo
. : soo4 toy ' . . a : - * J : woe. .
‘ . ' ’ us . “
fen, af : . . a (ae
Be : Cla ' Rog JOA
. : . 0 : . i . sorte .
to ‘ . : Poe fe ' pot . TIA 474 eT.
D . $ 5 vot ote sus .
an) ' te ‘ . . ete wo oa
“ 1 ’ 1 : * .
em le . . ! "4 1 . a .  eraqQare Ts
% . . .
« a . ‘. 7 poof a : t ‘ ’ %
‘ , _ . : . .
. = ~ ~. - .
; TAUND FY FAFA DE APF Weapacs ATretngA BeowPa aye TH A AT fd
: tee , .
« . ‘ ein . itt Bond
. : . = . : = eo
oe . mH m -
. a, coy = om -
‘ . : cm
» ¢ . , + oT
‘ , . : fox! _ :
i? + . . | = °
7 ' . . . . ‘ = ma -
‘ . - ‘ ~
fo im : ‘ Boe t . ‘ * co . cr
no ‘ a ‘ “ "ot _— : . “ ' ete .
. : ; . : ee - -a eo: ;
to ‘ feet “oF - Toe gs 7 . _ pres} = -
a > " 1 ‘ ‘ foe t £ * oa | .
ro . . . se ‘ . ¢ - Ded : t .
' . ey f . 77 a ' a ari
‘ No tay : . : fo “as i oe :
: ! : . to: aoe .
‘ ‘ . ’ : oO fey, "s sos .
my oy rot Jie a . s, . a et gE a , ure ‘
ant eo . ‘ ! at “4 f +e
, foe ‘ ‘ : : hs $ ) apt tet '
. * . : a 2 - et. * oa : ‘ t my a os
7 bt . ‘ ; » t - + “. . ,
. rr ‘ oo nd : . i *
: pote 2 of fo. fe . : ‘.
eo oo . : t - 2 :
! of : : * ae . .:
Saye v a . ‘ Pe . tig : eof oa . :
fos . fs : foe ge OF roy ae .
noe a . tt : + 4 ee _ : Y ' a?
: ‘ t ' +f . ' .
' ron ; - : H . , . ' :
' : oe vs . . tf tot Stoo
. . “oe «ie? . bey bo. >
‘ rong . est tg ¢ tog t ‘
q ’ we . . . ; '
‘ m : , 4 % ‘ . . 4 ” - .
. ‘ : Lod . or rr me, <s oe 4 !
a ‘ ° “ . ’ ay tole a . . noe
e ' . 7 ' ‘ ot *
‘ , 7 . > “6 # . ’ 1
4 ; , oa 5 . : sy a 1
soa ay 2 ood : , .
ose - ob OS : “ : : ae : Sea
5 mT, “ft “ ‘ i . wt, hoes
7 ' at . . ay é . a . . ' . ’
‘ie , "4 fe : hoot we Bok ‘ . ret
. . . : . Pe ‘ : ‘
' . too. * ca ’ ae toe '
. ‘ ‘ u “ toe ae , a . 1 ‘ af
my a un . - Tne , sf 1 ‘ eo
. . . * * 4 . ae
a . soya eo. . . at ‘ . * . ‘ ’
. . , . . ' t oy : Soa ot “My 2 ot \
t , ty . e s . . +
‘ ‘ . * 5
oF . ce . . : a t o , : va a ’ wy _ » + " ‘ ‘
, . ' + os ‘ 462
tat
NW 88296" Docld:32989628 Page ‘10! wB-| 1 p> ok . we


os TEOCOAL DURRAY OF INVESTICATION

Assoe. Dir.
"(R407 DN PLAIN COMMUNICATIONS SECTION Zz Dea DeA
4535 PM NITEL L mane 26, 1975 us@iar 86
TO: ‘ peiéctor, FBI TELETYPE

(ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING re hil

FROM? DENVER (66-DEAD)
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
RE BUREAU TEL TO ALL OFFICES, MARCH 24, 1975. .
PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY (IS) AND COUNTERS Diniz: sey?
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS (C1):
SAC - 0
ASAC-0
SUPERVISOR - ONE FULL TIME, 3/4 OF TIME OF IS, 1/4 TO CI
AGENTS = 12 AND 1/2, 3/4 TIME TO IS, 1/4 TIME TO CI.
IN DENVER OFFICE, 1S AND CI NATTERS ARE HANDLED BY FIELD
SUPERVISOR ON FULL TIME BASIS. DESERTER FUGITIVE CASES ALSO
HANDLED ON SQUAD BUT ONLY FRACTION OF SUPERVISOR'S AND SQUAD
TIME IS USED ON THESE CASES. SAC AND ASAC ARE KEPT ABREAST OF
IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS AND, OF COURSE, HAVE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY BUT
HAVE NOB IS OR CI MATTERS ASSIGNED TO THEM. BESIDES SUPERVISOR,
THERE ARE 8 SPECIAL AGENTS (SA) IN HEADQUARTERS CITY ASSIGNED
FULL TIME TO IS AND CI MATTERS WITH ONLY A SMALL FRACTION OF
THIS TIME GIVEN TO DESERTER FUGITIVE CASES. ALL BOMBING MATTERS


NW 88256 Docld:32983628 Page 312

(174 CLASSIFICATION) ARE CONSIDERED A PART OF IS INVESTIGATIONS,
TWO OF EIGHT SAS FULL TIME AND ONE SA HALF TIQE HANDLE cI MATTERS ,
REMAINDER HANDLE IS.

IN RESIDENT AGENCIES (RA) FOLLOWING SITUATION EXISTS:

ONE AGENT IN COLORADO SPRINGS SPENDS 59 @/@ AND ANOTHER AGENT
SPENDS 25 @/@ OF THEIR TIME ON IS AND CI MATTERS. IN BOULDER RA

ONE FULL TIME AGENT AND ONE AGENT SPENDING 60 6/0 OF HIS TIME HANDLE
IS AND CI MATTERS, IN FORT COLLINS RA ONE AGENT SPENDS 58 @/@

AND THE OTHER 40 0/0 OF THEIR TIME ON THESE MATTERS. IN CHEVENNE RA
ONE AGENT SPENDS 25 0/@ OF HIS TIME ONE THESE MATTERS. IN THE OTHER
RAS ONLY A MINOR FRACTION OF THE TIME OF EACH RA IS DEVOTED TO

IS AND CI MATTERS. TOTAL TIME WOULD POSSIBLY EQUAL THAT OF ONE

SA FULL TIME. IN ALL INSTANCES, ABOUT 3/4 OF TIME SPENT ON

SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS IS ON IS MATTERS WITH REMAINING 1/4 ON

Cl MATTERS. =

END

MAH FBIHQ ACK FOR FOUR

WA CLR


an

ST sed

STUOLT AST sive ot We Tat A Geng tcsG0 444 Cu GLTAGT AT .2e 4° art)

od

e2ISTIAT TD WICH Had WAR Ae Pe fo wd? A oa TT 8
oil HAR SROSTS

S2TL1'R WOMTANTI2 Blvd (6 TPa Ta Pals al

TESA TRUTOTe CWA PAS AO wONTde akTe 33 OatO4O VT TESA Go
AI AW bye LD .aRATTAS IS GIA 2t 40 Bald APART «NO eG @uuaye
BEV ERIT B14 FO AQ oo MIGUT( Tigea Foo ap TOLSS AT LWT aco

sNY SC G2INS Thsoa BO Gr wtTGdO0 THO CT. Talia. ID R.A Gl

AA WP TY O* 2b .MeSTTAG FAT MO SNIP FILET FO Nw aa TOHTO Ghd 204
eahTO RET CL 9 BHATIA AZahT 400 BOTT ath FC aN. Gh ROLLS Tada be

JP OTTOYAT ar A Rune FO SALT AST W SOTTIAAA ads A rll

aye 4 ae

tem - vom =

Po oy TAME GAWDU VT B08 CWI an, on9T Fa offate To ia
mm oa

v3 tg i be BET ‘dQ aye TYUO’e an DAL oad iar fill Sulu 4 be

WOOD MESTASD. UTI 2°S914 21 WO al ofan By if YT, 4.
wt

=z? TE

sl we eres . 19
~3
OS

Woy
FYE meen SOF CRD die

14 Ae

nw 02296 docids2960608 Page3 L2Q-| [YZIS- Sle


Assoc. Dir, _

¢ ke Dep-A.D-~Adm.__

as PprADelnv. :
Sst. Dir.:

TRVEST Ary f Admin. ___

FS SECTION ae “Afiaiey

Files & Com, __

Gen, Inv. 2

Ident. ... 1

Inspe:tion

Intell. _

FROM: DETROIT VA A ‘" é ( Leberatary
f ( 4 ©) Plan. & Eval, _
ATTENTIONS BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION, os | Spec, Inv.

Training
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. ae

Director See’y __

FLOR ah LERLAU Og

NRO32 DE CODE coumusncene
2342 PM NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 WGM YAN te 7

boul) ah pe
TO: CTOR Pera

a
wpe

RE BUTEL TO ALL SACS, MARCH 24, 1975.

DETROIT DIVISION CURRENTLY HAS ONE SUPERVISOR AND FOURTEEN
AGENTS ASSIGNED 190 PERCENT OF THEIR TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY
INVESTIGATIONS, ADDITIONALLY, ONE ASAC IS ASSIGNED FIVE
PERCENT, ONE SA TWENTY PERCENT, THREE SAS FIFTEEN PERCENT, ONE SA
TEN PERCENT, ONE SA FIVE PERCENT.

DETROIT DIVISION ALSO HAS ASSIGNED ONE SUPERVISOR AND
ELEVEN SAS SPENDING 109 PERCENT OF THEIR TIME ON COUNTER-
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS, IN ADDITION, ONE ASAC FIVE PERCENT, THREE
SAS 75 PERCENT, ONE SA 50 PERCENT, ONE SA TWENTY PERCENT AND ONE
Sa TEN PER CENT. QNE SAC HAS FIVE PERCENT OF TIME ON INTERNAL
SECURITY AND-FIVE PERCENT OF TIME ON OOUNTERINTELL IGENCE
MATTERS.
END
HOLD PLS

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 314

, , : . an " se geyan ery e tae pimetese Spee tt * AAs a,
: , . . * Ty ‘ 7 . . . . ’ ms
, : * : eayrace ta! 2 OT
Poe, Oot Log cyte ’ sg : _ .
ut . . ' : , a of 7” TOE , siQan
Coo 1 Ghats ni rranana ran moet gt 191 TITT TA
bgt + bye one he ree! ae os fe RON
ote : i ~ t ett eran PIA TAT Ny ast rey aay wut vt ct v . 77 mae) oer anor
-3! Te . . ’ “oY \ . . _— “ a
an een . . wee ee! . aay} e*? ate oP OAP aA ea va i
tote DO . oa ' od vs ‘
TOTES RARE ENTE ae Tucci ai) naw y footie " ME TVT HW TENAT TS
MT rpm cay a “" aRGILS ¥ an ak ae aarene =A Te mye aa oo” { royapen A r Perna
. , . a . wo
C “TT Tete p ne aes er VL pungr ace ee AT Te POT
. + y ‘ . :
nr) iii Ce hee Lt baa ai Oe ei oa he oe ee ia, Bela Ds ee OO Od ‘¢ i Lr
a ' va) or a , * .
me 7 ae ; 4 ves
. .. he TBR Cm FT ae ta aaa 4 7
_ or or Fe nignen nen rte REN AWA Pm KETO TES vr acre
: . : ; : . .
Loe C ETI te apt enn ga sitar ae BP op megeaa. tier e

cewek pale

. so
neat:

ae eel Eto nen eee gre mre ST im t Beran, I pee
* : , . 33 .
‘carta (Pk p eemney rere Ro to ta A ' MURTEN reT “a hd BE ann FY. oN
cos a : wo, ; Me ny
. . . * . oot . or KB .
ya rey

nh
7 UT BP Te IN. TIN ae me Sete ps ~EO
7 : * M . nos alee

Jo eimet* ilo 2am

‘ ; 4 ‘ soe LL so zl. = Cory
bone See jen : : : ; ‘Sun peers
mT UT OTT OP INR RE Te mre UT Tet OTT
a . cae Peta t 7m oa oa ’ % ' L vs .
wih Wwe rn : ' oat ‘ . adil "4a ot
.f * “+ “4 . Po ‘ Se . i, . . .
, oy a : - pique net ate,
. : ' 4 se, . s ’ .
ie . cared
* - : :
r . ' s
+ n vo ae ot om i aga
1 a) 7? as car Poa,
. ot ve ar’ '
: . 1 4 : , ,
*, qT ' '
'
a ‘
* 5 . , ry
, ‘ 1 , the
o i
“ot
‘ '

| NW 88296 Docld:32889628 Page 315

an


J

neers
i Assog Tis,
Popes ADA dm,
q + DT

“7% FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION /
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION —

MAR 25 G7

NR@@2 EP CODE "TELETYPE =
6228 PM NITEL - 3+25=75 MJT =
TO:  DIREGTOR | =

whe BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION See Te
FROM: EL PASO (66-NEW) SIIAPLLT ; —

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

REBUTEL MARCH 24, 19756

SAC, EL PASO CURRENTLY SPENDS 3 PERCENT OF TIME SUPERVISING
INTERNAL SECURITY, 2 PERCENT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE$ ASAC HANDLES NO
SECURITY MATTERS 3 SUPERVISOR NUMER THREE DESK DEVOTES 15 PER CENT OF
TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS, 5 PER CENT TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE.

FOUR AGENTS CURRENTLY ASSIGNED SECURITY MATTERS, WITH ONE AGENT
DEVOTING 6@ PER CENT OF TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY, 8 PER CENT TO
COUNTERI NTELLIGENCE$ SECOND AGENT SPENDS 1@ PER CENT ON INTERNAL
SECURITY MATTERS, 75 PER CENT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE$ THIRD AGENT 56
PER CENT INTERNAL SECURITY, 18 PER CENT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE$ FOURTH
AGENT, WHO IS RELIEF SUPERVISOR, DEVOTES 19 PER CENT OF TIME TO
INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS, 65 PER CENT TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE.
END

NW 88296 Dochd:329696024 Page 316


STs

AAG AT |
"4 ry stalpag he “AU

ee ee a
SON Da,

Tun CT ae CO wee LET wear)
SATIAITQ oT

hod

=
i=)
Y

carp magne Cua Tegus SITs

NANSINAN CMR es?) OfAd IT thom

OPITIVNITIA FORO METH YT WO SITTIN od Tos me ATANSS

e@T 2 ght ite 2AN gatas

aS x
TULTRIVITSUT AIT WO Tegcse 5 acyaqe yaTicrara Bea 4G SE _923
on

VD DATTA GAA  f TOY SATE IITA ISAT ALO TAXOATI & @¥

RS}

AUS SAM ATT

TI
SD TIAN TTS Of BYP OYUN MORE TIGHT are AHR TYRES g BAe T TI YT LANNE

a

oO VT ADLETPIE TT UD OF Ty Tee 2 PVETTA YTIGUT 2 IVETE OT VIT
PITA THQ MTEM YET TTAM YTIANAI® ATINTN|A YITARAID RTATAe UOT

YT TAT 8Fa oe QYTIAUORS GAMO TST CT ENTT TO THEO ara ne TeETOVSS

IASOUT AL 4a THE ATG AE ACTIND TTA SPONTA g INIT OTT TIT MID

NZ THAN CONT gIMAAIIT TST AN TaHO OTe OV gBRVTTAM YTTWUOL2

STUD 2 COSTA LT LSAT oD THIS Aas he QVPEUOTS GAWELTAY Tago Ar

vie ae ob

POAPET $9 PT’ es) SE RE BITOUA ,FOQTYIIIS AVTIFA BT GH! . TEM

e VEL VAATATN LP 16D OP PAO OT ae gRTTTAY YTIO ONS GA ANTVE

mod

| Docld:32989628 Page 317 Ga- | 62395- Eile


Assoc. Dir.
Dep.-A.D-Adm

Dep-A.D.-Inv._——
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION j Admin. —
MAR 2 6 1975
TELE i.
NR @81 HN CODE | : Laborstory ——
_ ) Piav. & Eval —
5:98 PM HST NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 JVS Spee. ny.
} Legal Coun.
TO: DIRECTOR i Yelephone Rm. —
— Director | Secy. —
FROM: AMONOLULU (66 ) IP a loci ;
ser
arenyn BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION. /

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.
RE BUREAU NITEL TO ALL SAC*S, MARCH 24, 1975.
HONOLULU CURRENTLY HAS FOUR SPECIAL AGENTS ASSIGNED PRIMARILY

SECURITY MATTERS BROKEN DOWN BY PERCENTAGE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND

INTERNAL SECURITY AS FOLLOWS: 2 AGENTS 96 PER CENT ON COUNTERINTELLI-

GENCE AND AND 16 PER CENT EACH OTHER MATTERS$ 1 AGENT 75 PER CENT

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE», 25 PER CENT INTERNAL SECURITY$ 1! AGENT 39 PER

CENT COUNTERI NTELLIGENCE, 49 PER CENT INTERNAL SECURITY, 38 PER

CENT OTHER MATTERS. 3 ADDITIONAL AGENTS SPEND APPROXIMATELY 15

PER CENT OF THEIR TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY.

| ASAC, SUPERVISES SECURITY MATTER, SPENDS 55 PER CENT OF

TIME ON SECURITY BROKEN DOWN AS: 25 PER CENT COUNTER INTELL-

IGENCE AND 18 PER CENT INTERNAL SECURITY.

END. ce. nit
ont 08 eo
HOLD an oF poe os

sor gl
\} xe:

NW 88296 Docid:37989626 Page 313


} Beet a
' Pee de at

Bony yy pea an

PUL QTE Qe HICH ISTE TAH id oP8e
po qOTIIP IG 207
Ql €  @A) WIIOIOH gto 7

STOLTORS ATT YOIIA GIA THICHE BOTTATITS
eRTITIVITOA TOVIOIISTNT “Oo TATTINVOD Tstae HPA TE
eoT@L gh@ HOAAN ,2°UA7 LES OT ARTI Weesue Fz

WATCAPE'S THN TRE. aTieay YATOTIR SUOT Bid, TUTIE AND Yeon
CT BOPTOLATTNEIT IND TATION Yr MOG “AOFE BARTAAN YT UOT

eTLiaTETGThyay 4a Tr IW ava pe BinTaA oO sean uay os Brews Wn oT I

ams

Mm
PTD TET AY TOT SA £ gaqeTTeN S@yra 4oae rasa Fi rE MA GIA EF
LSa
~<, —
TURE TELS Pos YTTNNGFS SVPTTOL TIRd 23q eco Groemal sori samnoy
~~
a
seer . - ‘3 ed SS aoe writs mae
POT AS g YE ETUOGD IMIRUTH LT THI RAI HA QP OME INTTiUOd ic
TE MITA Tyres CaTay PTI IAIOTTIAIA & Br aeTO Tt

eYTIAUOT® MAM OUTeL QO SUIT STINT TO Teo ars

BITS TT TS ce Tea g MTTAN YPIayOTE WERT UD g TATA
cIITTET OT pro Trea AME Te spe aN CO MOT YYTWIFA A ery
eYTE NORD IA HATE TTR TM TA TON Ag

" oy

mat

we fe 8

| NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 319 leQ- (4395-56


NW 88296 Docld:32989626 Page 320

Pn on oneal

ity
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION |e poAdm

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

MAR Sb Rig 7

\e

a —
phe Pa Cav vat ~-
mapa orig 6 LO Ext, Affairs —-_
§ inh fe. 4 vd fir i Pie om

. Gen. Inv. .—.——-
NR#98 HO CODE ‘ Ie.t |
, Inspestion ———— ¥
Int he |
Lalkrat t¥ --——— i
Plan. & Eval. — %
Spec. Inv. ———
Training —————
Legal COUT. ~ncmmnee
Telephone Rie o-
Director See’y ——

5:55 PM NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 BNG

TOs wa p
FROMs TON

HO
remo BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION.

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUREAU TEL TO ALL SACS, MARCH 24, 1975.
SET FORTH BELOW ARE SAC, SUPERVISOR AND AGENTS CURRENTLY

WORKING INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS AS
REQUESTED IN REFERENCED TEL:

“E i INTERNAL SECURITY COUNTERINTELL IGENCE
AGENTS - 2285 278
SUPERVISOR 058 246
SAC 22 284

END
HOLD d,


309 GH Sah ah

om FY eran etS HOARI ASTIN HE 2235

>

ROTIEGIG 307

HOTeHOH shOn

ot O1T972 a" 1 THUAN Gis THeeus sol NETTA

' oes TIVITOA 295) 591 USTs 20 SETTINOD T9aUge i LTWae
. a ered! e8S NORY: Ral tA or 130: waz ug SA
7 7 oye" = po
a | YaTUBARIO Taos au | ROBIN ATY a2 EAA OS48 RNOT TER
re Do eam mM
rte 2A @hattig TUNs AL UG TEL ALTA UOD oa yELAUORD SeRET OB GALIRO
ane Ho - a 5487 aon ROWAY UE ARTERY
1 . : 7 . , ey en ao : -
gf e ) 1 80NE STATO TRSTIYES, “ vETRbaze. Jes reat BRS
a \: + ; ‘ t . , . ; . r rt ~
a ‘ ' LVS ‘ , , ‘a , : deg oe - , OTSA
ar ibe eT Bg ROSEVNEIUL
ae ene gt rl ae
G35

q NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 321

Gjui

UA |63B9S SL


) NW 86296 Dochd:32589628 Page 322

Assoc, Dit, ———es
Dep. -A.D-AdM ae

; camaro Seno = | Bk
NROOS IP CODE MAR 2.5 1975 | Pag =
5:39 PM NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 RA Se agg hy |
T DIRECTOR : 1 ua
FROM INDIANAPOLIS , ke 6 al _
ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION j Spe Im = —

Legal Coun,

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES a
RE BUREAU TEL, MARCH 24, 1975.

Telephone Rm
See'y .

AS REQUESTED IN REFERENCED TEL, FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS BEING
FURNISHED CONCERNING INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO
INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS:

Hobs

sac ==” NONE
AsAc’'~ NONE
SUPERVISORS -30 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND .40

INTERNAL SECURITY
SPECIAL AGENTS 6.25 ASSIGNED COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND
9.50 ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY.
END
HOLD FOR FIVE MORE

“y
AOS noite 4

Po je si

at S <3 a eh
Se


{ eg oo “ i

rere

NW°88296. Docld:32989628 Page 323

i ay
wT TORE

U2 WUBI SL,

. pe eg i. be -“, . apma Ve ay
SCHEME tO gh Oaan sad » Na .
i toa “3 . . :
oF ! Dard i
. ag. "
‘ EOo
i ‘ - + : a
: i: ot
woe “
. . CTC ALATA
t :

Saad. NOs aan

me dy

a Of, 0 seat Tivos rondet JW" PDO 4.
8 aimee at te 1h a toute Li a
Ts ~ 4 oe a -
3 i ‘ eit ral a Ae lewaet rT) ie
+ . . - . r } , . rp
.70 7 - mee at a ont mt ameoman oa i ‘
1 ; To2 UL pa i. ‘ay I Dade gmt dh Plato ee teers - are , ; 7
: po ri = bo
' an Toye a a e ETO. eetyed ,
rns meen) ee Mit EO THC DT eT A Toya a eUeE as .
‘ : rn ! ad. a “
1 ; P ; o> fess od
° hE, an somdut eye serie, rr oe oe ad HA ATT
ary i Ft i 1 f
‘ ? oO
; i i ' ‘ ; wee + 7} peer on ta
. Poo, : : : or . 2 ,
. . 4 ots i! ni ‘ Sane ae t n ;
. ‘f ‘, i wig: . CT Rey
1 . : - re :
- ; Os, (4-2 eet Ls LoPRTANT age o&, ‘ TDs, .:
. . Poke , ; a H
ay . . : : 7 : : pee Th (ewe i . : “Th
re po UTE SR FLORETT sy OG
: : 3
t : . Lo 3
‘ ome . re . Pa « nye owe . i t
. ‘ ' or Mey. TELL falaate 10d Cg ube! ef ad: : att hey. Wigs 16 '
‘ t =o iar ‘ aid “ ge « ’ , f ‘
t Bad: havy Bee OT Slovela ca ote : . t .
’ H + : ‘ Lo 3
, ey v ys j Sah cr
. ‘ 7 .
‘ re ho WUE T cpog Tut.
: . 1 : , ; ' whe ted ahr * aad, Hee
- ‘ { ’ : too. ' . i
1 . + . te
: : 5 . . '
i ~ . . j : "
: H . '
z . .
5 i “ :
gt. ‘ Roos ‘ ! Loe : :
, . : . . My ' t ] Py 1
not a : i ‘ fol , F
‘ . 5 7 F
de .
24k , Oo y
: i 1. : 3
to. ,
‘ . ' a
: ft mY : ro m
, ie ’ :
4 . : a4
fe , i ' : . we
a. . . wi ; .t
- z ' t


Assoe, Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-
{ FEDERAL CURERY OF HIVESTIGATION —— Doped cin
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION ae Dir:
7 nay.

MAR 2 6 1975 ;
NROOS CODE JN TENE ET VP °
E Ae
43:07PM NITEL MARCH 26, 1975 JwD ” E <

TO _ ECTOR, ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION Pian, ‘k Teal =

ae —_
Trina 4 oe
Legal Con
Telephes. Fam,
Direetor See’y _

FROM JACKSON ¢ 100-0)

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUREAU NITEL MARCH 24, 1975.

SAC AND ASAC, JACKSON OFFICE, HAVE NO CASES ASSIGNED IN
INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FIELD. Two
SUPERVISORS HAVE CASES ASSIGNED AND THE PERCENTAGE OF TIME IS
EQUIVALENT TO FORTY PERCENT OF ONE SUPERVISOR IN INTERNAL
SECURITY AND FIFTEEN PERCENT OF ONE SUPERVISOR IN COUNTER-
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS THERE ARE FIFTY FIVE SPECIAL AGENTS WHO
CONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS IN THE INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTER-
INTELLIGENCE FIELD. THE PERCENTAGE OF TIME 1S EQUIVALENT
TO THREE POINT SIX TENTHS AGENTS ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO
INTERNAL SECURITY AND ONE POINT ONE TENTH AGENTS ASSIGNED
FULL TIME TO GOUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS.
END -,
DBS FBIHQ CLR

| NW 86296 Docid:32985628 Page 324


ae met clo ae t
Pe FL A ee.
. . Saggy MeN gama ! . ree Lk

We ma ’ .
' te a .

* .

NW 88296 Doctd:32989628. Page 36 L2- | [ (395-5 - wo oe


Assoc. Dir. .

2. Dep-A-D-Adg— :
oe FLUGHAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ZL in rare
. COMMUNICATIONS SECTION ie etnee

Comp. Syst. 2.

MAR 9 5 275 Ext. Affaira iW.

Files & Com,

ber? Gen, Inv...”

NROO3 JK CODE TELETYPE, Toon a
7245 PM NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 GLB Lats rat ny ee
Plan. & Eval

pec. Inv. ow.
Training 2.1.
Legal Coun 2
Telephone Rm —
Director See’y . .

TO DIRECTOR
ATTENTIONS BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION

FROM JACKSONVILLE C100-NEW ¢ RUC)
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUREAU NITEL, DATED MARCH 24, 1975.

THE FOLLOWING I$ SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO REFERENCED NITEL
FOR JACKSONVILLE DIVISION:

ONE SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED FIFTY PERCENT INTERNAL SECURITY
AND TEN PERCENT INTELLIGENCE MATTERS.

PERCENTAGES OF AN AGENT'S TIME, NONE ASSIGNED FULL TIME
TO THESE ACTIVITIES, ACCUMULATED TO REPRESENT FOUR AGENTS
ASSIGNED INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS AND ONE AGENT ASSIGNED
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS,

END
b wt
hake
# Wine
og h STON oo y Z 16
poh wes we ae is
att
ene
Bae
so f
ey fe
ODF

NW 68296 Docid:32969628 Page 326 1


eerrerres "LRG OV a THs goegee “Gall
' 7 . ’ , * oe . wo
, Pg ee Sipe Leet ree,
vote Ade FS, GEL Ob, aya as oI reTil.. Wo be Pala THT
DoS S98 SOP ga et ay ay
* . . . . .
YIUANSTS Wyden Det Pam om MATE face es tay
7 ’ . . , > = . , = . te
. : . ' evi Sb fL. utd ie i ae te mf
40a iit, eee Vile ke ET TY Bog a UO tuo LR sue
. eye i bd Pa Ft PI TIA pe ea
. a’ Ste es Se at . 4 eal as Yuh tect nee abt ET yes. tT.
. ae . GAETES EMOTE THEA tt
~ , .
. 1 ‘

NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page 327

LA-116395-

She

we”


Assoc, “Dir,
DPeP-A.Di-Adma
ep.-A.D.-Iny,
Asst. Din:
Admin,
f Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs __
i Files & Com, _
en. Iny.
Ident.
Incpeetion
Intell,

ra
FEDER BEDEAU OF WIYESTiocty 4
NR 895 KC CODE ROMEMENEATIONS SEETION

YU Sas,

6:15 PM 3/25/75 MITEL JAW eee
bouts ep”
TO: ECTOR _— pur

eee 8

CATTNSBUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION) oe ae ae

| Ai ASHE] Bee Shar

FROM: KANSAS CITY (190-9) Ng Spee. Inv.
Training

} Legal Coun,
Telephone Rm, __
| Director See'y

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES,

REBUNITEL 3/24/75.
KANSAS CITY DIVISION HAS ONE SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED TO HANDLE
INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS, TIME SPENT
IS 58 PERCENT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND 48 PERCENT INTERNAL SECURITY.
TWO AGENTS ARE ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
AND NO AGENTS ARE ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY.
KANSAS CITY HAS THIRTEEN ADDITIONAL AGENTS HANDLING BOTH
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS, BROKEN DOWN
AS FOLLOWS: FIVE AGENTS, 9G PERCENT, INTERNAL SECURITY AND ONE AGENT,
96 PERCENT, COUNTERINTELLIGENCEs TWO AGENTS, 39 PERCENT ON EACHs; FOUR
AGENTS, 19 PERCENT ON EACH, AND ONE AGENT 5@ PERCENT ON INTERNAL
SECURITY.
END
HOLD

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 328


see at -
were a pyr
7 + ea tee

he “ey erase AM

nae cars Toran

WoTeaNELE JST Eu

genase rete reat VT yrin EAR EY.

Aw CIT.

erm ot * . " > J owe! . wm meet
fs ad : . «
- . ’ mae me Caueed me, “CP pee cote nad - . te gM eam
, : - ae th FS ivy i? agp a "oy wa TO LIER wee ESA Pehl OTe waa Be
. at oa . . ia . . . - -
‘ woe . vets Spery 2 pie em, i treet hope Ngee oe = me na pe :
- : . ersg 7! Dac teas UTED OT. eT Fee oF eae Ad PET P|
oF a : . i = "BS : ’
. - Strep Sy > . ye Oy nT 9 a Cn Be ar hae fe
on TA Bae a as aot Beg oe canny a
oe ‘ ee an ies. ms toe
Tae moh, ro - gee : ie i
. i eer s >. .
: . = we wee 3 eas yf ;
. : , . oot oe Pry.
+ Ay . coe dealt Td ates cite beta tea «
‘ ” “et YL ‘SFE a dAS ROT at giv RE.
oT r . ad € *
‘ , tee . . 2, ‘ .
. . etree | ster, es . Fey am a fg) ay vacck py seep”
, . re : te ta . w1d Je" wee Teh G2 Pr ees we yf
v te
" . capes ot trons Vom oP route ve
. 1 ow THA on f HOE: ie earn recht
. . oe - an . !
~ + .
. . 1
. .
wy : an 7 . .
. : ro . tote
ry .
: . ' .
. 4
7 1 ' . 7, 4
. oan oo.
1 . Loo , a = H
a " “a . ’ |
. ;
. . !
. wot * ' :
soe toe oe - _
. yoF
7 > . . +
' : .
vo wo . oes .
a . roy _ oo n
woot nn
a ’ ory
: , : : . . : .
. ' . . °
; , .
: «


- we
Assoc. Itz.

“8 FLOLEAL GUNEAU OF sIVESTIGATION 2.4
oc COMMUNICATIONS SECTION eet
WARE oe Bs ites

«NROO4 KX CODE

oe
\2

8:19 PM NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 WEH VLEs Vie
TOs pentCtor, FBI (ATNs BUDGET & ACCOUNTING SECTJON)..7”
FROM? SAC, KNOXVILLE (190-90) mate
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES, ‘ ~

Inspection
Intl. es
abot vy —--
Plan. & Eval. —
Spee. luv. —..-
Praining ——.. -
Leyal Coun... -
Yelephone Rm. ~~
Director Sec’y  .-

RE BUREAU TELETYPE DATED MARCH 24, 1975, CAP}+

TIONED AS ABOVE, a
Bette,
INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE = “Wy Joyo,
Ode is ~ CB!
MATTERS ARE SUPERVISED EXCLUSIVELY ON THE ASAC'S a9; tae,
* “Sey

DESK IN THE KNOXVILLE DIVISION, IT IS ESTIMATED .
THAT THE ASAC SPENDS APPROXIMATELY 25 PERCENT OF Ge
HIS TIME ON SUCH MATTERS, DIVIDED 15 PERCENT TO IN-
TERNAL SECURITY AND 1@ PERCENT TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE,

IN ADDITION, THERE. ARE FIVE AGENTS WITHIN THE

DIVISION WORKING PRIMARILY ON SECURITY MATTERS. TWO

OF THESE AGENTS SPEND 8@ PERCENT OF THEIR TIME ON If-
TERNAL SECURITY WORK AND 5 PERCENT OF THEIR TIME ON
COUNTERINTELLIGENCEs ONE AGENT SPENDS 75 PERCENT ON
INTERNAL SECURITY AND 28 PERCENT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE$
ONE AGENT SPENDS 6@ PERCENT ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND

35 PERCENT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCEs AND ONE AGENT SPENDS
26 PERCENT ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND 75 PERCENT ON

NW 68296 Docld:3279896268 Page 330


HF me

PAGE TWO KX 198-68
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE.

SECURITY ITEMS REQUIRING THE PERSONAL ATTENTION
OF THE SAC UTILIZE ABOUT 5 PERCENT OF HIS TIME ON EACH
CATEGORY.
END.
DBS FBIHQ ACK FOR ONE AND CLR

é

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 331


Nw’ 88296 Doela:32988628 Page 332 Gal [(Z39S-So TT a —_

“st

Apel XH eey TANT

dee

' . . - * mo crop ey THOT TY

J OMPTPIETTA sauoerte ENT wncecot sere yrrwers

s te ee be wl
4
. ; ey ; ute .
MAT ONA EM YT nT To Trias PS TROTs ASTLEITY Wyo TIT Te
a * * = ‘ ‘ , "
. 7 s . > ;
re gk
te 5 “ ,
: oe , : . t
, 7 z oat 2
. ry - -. .
' ny . . te tre wy + * at “we reo
had eral tre set won cerca rey
’ .
: Se” - ; '
: . : a —:
" x ' ‘ mo m .
0 , t . t , a “ie
me wig rote, i | Sr
, . . =
. . os + pa mes.
; : ' > Ltt ' 1 oo aT
7; 1 weep =
. . ee
a , . wae coord
+ + ‘ est. - :
: . , -
¢ '
* . . at
. ’ : w ‘ .
t * , .
1 ’
bee yn,
t : : :
™ t
2 . .
: . t :
sof ‘ i . . ‘ "
. t .
+ ? ’ .

.


ao FAs Dir,

Dep-A.D~Adm,
Dep.A D-lny,__
dlsnt, Dire:
Admin, |
Comp, Syst ma

MR @11 LV CODE
DERAL Bureau

838 PM NITELMARCH 25, 1975 MLP concur tera
ON

TO,” DIRECTOR, FBI iat 2 5 1975
FROM LAS VEGAS (189-90) ae

ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING seer LATYPE
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUREAU TELETYPE, MARCH 24, 1975.

LAS VEGAS SAC AND ASAC DO NOT SUPERVISE INTERNAL SECURITY
MATTERS. LAS VEGAS HAS NO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE maTTERS $

LAS VEGAS HAS ONE FIELD SUPERVISOR WHO SUPERVISES INTERNAL
SECURITY MATTERS AMONG MANY OTHER CATEGORIES. IT IS ESTIMATED
THIS SUPERVESOR SPENDS TEN PER CENT OF HIS TIME ON MATTERS OF AN
INTERNAL SECURITY NATURE.

LAS VEGAS HAS FIVE SPECIAL AGENTS WHO ARE NORMALLY ASSIGNED
INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT-TWO OF THESE
AGENTS SPEND APPROXIMATELY 95 PER CENT OF THEIR TIME ON THESE

MATTERS. ONE OTHER SPENDS APPROXIMATELY 3@ PER CENT, AND THE anpeS
OTHER TWO, APPROXIMATELY 20 PER CENT. eee y

aga 7 guLssh pred
END He eu £19

TJT FBI WASH DC CLR aoene

@) Soper Don Sinith crits Pref ayel aebh COS Courteri, 4 ds
mottr<s thot be as Follies! Mo sopervi tory Tme,

Pata moe
‘ahene

tfaafr § 2. ng teh S pre luscl ene show Bis
5 Fim 0 of bis be & ond ohawh 15,
; Porsh.

Ap

i

4G09 va 11%
4 TE CV@d gO HOVAM GETI Aq +e

‘ ro) .MOTITAIC | OT
Chhe TE) TAABY 2A MOR
a . ve A het - . spent
AQITIRS MITMUGIOA Gia Tredye :"*Tr*
ewe ISIVITIA BVIBALMI TL eo SAT TEs Towae sTAuI.
eOTOi Qh? HOAAD oHUYT AGT ATH? 57
YTICUCD® ANS UTAL TSTUATGue TOL OG WEA Gia TAB BADTY aA
eRe TT AM TWIP ALEPTIN TAT don 0° BAR Bana weap YR UTTTS:

JAVITE TY QVOTUT aN AMM PORTYTIWM CATTE Tic QAM BAY B44

COPAMTENT PT TL g2UICOUTAT CUNTA via anaee geqTre YTETUOT

4A IO SIETTAM TT ULh BI FO Tes) ae nay ceetas ea Erie ay
aa Ea
mr .
eTOUTAU CYETEMEIN GAVALT LT
aa
TROT OPA VM EfAraa Tay Qu ATIT IA Garage art Bik = Bau med
ra Pa

tt

FORKT FO OMT TAvT OTT ITSA OL TE Dt TITAS BBR aerate

ARE 19 SET TINT TO THB) Wa te yess cTM@lae: wee TET

ct

TAA TUNIS OI PE YGITAR ESOT G A ROS TENTO WG 4g BUTT A

; eTITS TTD YUNT A Trotage Qader S4H TS

Af De NPA LO AGT

‘uwse206 oocaszeees2 pagers XI Ilo BIS Sle

nn

Assoc. Dir. -
Dep.~A.D.-Adms
Dop-A.D.-Inv.wees
Asst, Dir.:

Admin, | ....—~we
Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs .—
Files & Cum. —

FEDERAL BUREAY OF InVEsTiCAT
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

NR O84 LR PLAIN MAR 26 1975
3209 PM URGENT/“ARCH 26, 1975 6M TELETYPE ;

Inspection .
Intell, ..--~~ |
Y Labsratury ~~

Plan. & Eval — -
Spee. Inv.
Training

Legal Coun,
Telephone Rm.
Director See’y _..

To

| sof f
we wae

FROM LITTIYE ROCK (661880) wh AE
(ye

ATTENTIONC BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION.

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL SAC*S, MARCH 24, 1975.

FOLLOWING SET FORTH IN RESPONSE TO REFERENCED
TELETYPE s

TWO AGENTS IN LITTLE ROCK DIVISION ASSIGNED PART-TIME
ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS WITH
BREAKDOWN OF TIME SPENT AS FOLLOWS:

ONE AGENT SPENDS APPROXIMATELY 45 PERCENT OF TIME
ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND 5 PERCENT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
MATTERS. SECOND AGENT SPENDS APPROXIMATELY 65 PERCENT
OF TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND 19 PERCENT ON COUNTER-
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS. ONE SUPERVISOR SPENDS APPROXIMATELY
8 PERCENT OF HIS TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND 2 PERCENT
ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS.

END


Yee VEeted,
~- 4
od

% “8

. iy

4

at

+

{

ee

eek GF
ne eee
wee le! kr

yi
:
ay

NW 88296 Docid:32989628

xd Hh
bang NTR tee

ann ee a

AC kg wEnda 4 bad on:
WO OVAL ght NOZHS TU wid Core
FOTD+ £4 ty
Cubs pedo) SOG. GAPE id
eo ALTA: SiTAUOOwW ~ A TES Iu. 2 fh. aTTA
eslITIVIPVW AMMAN GGT 40 BaTTieeod TasdIu Vi awde
esTOE gi HOSS Qah es MA oT SarvTod i UABrU lL.
PRBibrl 7 ML BUCWets S21 HTA07T Tas derided
g2sartaddi
“MIT! Tha udesDet) AODRIVIT NQu2 BLTTIN AI 4 iT
SEIN @ STA. Load lL Ede T THT ae) Gite By ee dana dul uo
2 JOLIO4 eh T BS ilie 1R OK
BRED cd Tan a4 ch YEETAUTSOC 44 eB Burs ny
SMEG EAT IVT ag dd ao Tueye nt é daa Ficus sachet. 1 vee
2 OUT oo TUETANIROT IMA UDISTO TAB OA Gilat e487 $b.
2ST L5G 60 Peanety YE da YTD MAGGATOL oO CUIT 4.
YAFG LO eA Bate FORIVAESE TN J aPaTTAL Codd at Li rad
T PVT TL & Tle YTIRUOTS Wane TL So si IT al WO T4kieta ¢
esto Lies SOPOT ATI 1, ICO 25

pagers WA-Nb3BIS-S.


Fee AAL Coven GF UVESTSATION
a bac iUNICATIONS SECTION 24,
=e

MAR 36 1975
—
NR @29 LA/CODE TELETYPE

12:69 PM URGENT 3-26-75 SMa

fed feet Te
»

a

i ~y -_
TO DIRECTOR (Wo eek
FROM YOS ANGELES na eT
jl Telephone Rm
ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION | Director Sec'y —_
7 a
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES aa buckef) fe
RE BUTEL, MARCH 24 LAST. bgAd Zev

LOS ANGELES DIVISION HAS CAREFULLY BROKEN DOWN BY PERCENTAGES
THOSE AGENTS WORKING INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTER- INTELLIGENCE
WORK USING THOSE CLASSIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY SUPERVISOR GROOVER.
DIVISION HAS A TOTAL OF 91 AGENTS PLUS ONE SAC, FOUR SUPERVISORS
ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY AND ONE SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED TO
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE, ASSIGNED TO SUCH CLASSIFICATIONS. THIRTY
FIVE OF THESE WORK COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND 56 WORK INTERNAL SECURITY.

ADMINISTRATIVE

LOS ANGELES IS SUBMITTING FOR BUREAU'S CONSIDERATION, IF
PERTINENT. THREE OF THE ABOVE 56 CLASSIFIED AS SECURITY AGENTS
WORK FULL TIME ON BOMBING MATTERS WHICH ARE ALMOST ALL MATTERS
WHEREIN WE HAVE NO JURISDICTION EXCEPT FOR DATA KEEPING FOR
NATIONAL BOMB DATA CENTER. TWELVE OF THE 56 SECURITY AGENTS

“ ath ws : a pices?

Cepptte —
agaun f° wSt ip .
ee BR

pass,

NW 86296 Docid:327989628 Page 337
Se

PaGE TWO

ARE INVOLVED FULL TIME IN OUR FALSE IDENTITY PROGRAM, THIS 2
PROGRAM ORIGINATED WITH OUR WEATHFUG ACTIVITIES, HOWEVER, 7
THE FRAUDULENT USE OF DECEASED INFANT IDENTITY PAPERS HAS 23
EXPANDED TO SUCH A DEGREE THAT THE VAST MAJORITY INVOLVE

CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES OTHER THAN SECURITY WORK. SEVEN OF THE 56

AGENTS ON SECURITY ARE INVOLVED FULL TIME IN FUGITIVE

INVESTIGATIONS WHICH ORIGINATE WITH SOME DEMONSTRATION OR

ACT OF TERROR, ETC, BUT AT THE PRESENT THEY ARE CLEAR CUT

CRIMINAL FUGITIVE INVESTIGATIONS. ONE OF THE 56 IS INVOLVED

FULL TIME IN THE HANDLING OF FOREIGN POLICE COOPERATION

MATTERS WHICH IS TECHNICALLY AN APPLICANT-TYPE INVESTIGATION,

BUT THE 163 CLASSIFICATION WAS INCLUDED IN THE SECURITY
CLASSIFICATIONS. TSUMMARIZING THESE EXCEPTIONS WE HAVE A TOTAL

OF 23 AGENTS WHO ARE ASSIGNED TO SECURITY WORK BUT ARE, IN

FACT, NOT INVOLVED IN ANY INTERNAL SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS,

LEAVING ONLY 33 AGENTS DEVOTING THEIR FULL TIME EFFORTS TO

INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS PLUS, THE ABOVE MENTIONED $5
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AGENTS.

END

JTG FBIHQ CLR


NW 65296 Dochd:329896

ata d,
OPT POT
re
en . ~~e SS
wip Jot la

SMT ICT a
pron tices
poY CPs

ym ae

. | orey rents

eco piftelt *
Sh ataT

9628 Page 339

epee te ok ee wom, an pare .
@ cesar SPP Volt ou 4 ethene twa my iTc’ Jo Ties
8 oT 0 fy alos als TUN WaT abe oh oa ot
. wo te - - . > agen ge "
a re OE DR Oe ney Ot I
tae see . . = .
att besa ‘ we Fw ek Ob -_*. ei: r on re Se
cee . tay | . ., et
“TOUT: ecoidb., (PP. 8 PoouTgrem yo tere
oe
RR tet pee acest oe eg ne
OE VTE SETS Ge TITIES kaa T ‘ WIT TE
a <
Pry
. 7 wae : ; : ney
TET eg FUEL Sf CAD ater obs ‘Hat a0 3% ff
om w&
ers ros 4 . sep hg ar tie. oe ry em te
Dur PE UT LS aS adc OP cht
2° 23
eu. gt oe towyges . wp tar vee at 4 ~ “y
OLS & cela’ . Itt Phe oe ne BTeTsc At
amend
CAR Lem pe pee +e sow A of or, ta fe
TOM YT IT YP fh TT a fo
"oF mt eee TTT ty = .
: een Je ae da Se : fr ' 23 ; aoe ef 7


ge

FEDERAL BURKAU OF INVESTIGATION
ae egg SECTION

Assee. Dir, —
Dep.-A.D.-Adm__. !
Dep-A.D-Inv.— os. #

Asst. Dir.:
Adrain.

NRG1I3 LS CODE Pet Ape ca oe
9245 PM NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 HSH etdfioe aly
10 ETYPE | 7: (=

RECTOR AK A fap veal
FROM LOUISVILLE mak th D
ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION N ) egal "ea,

¥ Dircat-+ See'y
epee

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.
REBUTEL TO ALL SACS, DATED MARCH 24, 1975.
PURSUANT TO REFERENCED COMMUNICATION, FOLLOWING DATA

PERTAINS TO LOUISVILLE DIVISION AGENT PERSONNEL ASSIGNED

INTERNAL SECURITY (IS) AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE (CI) MATTERS:
SUPERVISOR (1) 40 IS, 19 Cl$ AGENT (1) 85 IS, 19 CI3

AGENT (1) 25 IS, O CIs AGENT (1) 59 IS, 25 Cl$ AGENT (1)

25 IS, B CLs AGENT (1) 30 IS, 4B Cls AGENT (1) 4g IS,

1G CLs AGENT (1) 56 IS, 25 CL; AGENT (1) 1G IS, BCI.

END. et 7

NW 88296 _Docld: 22589628 |


S402 BE BETS

ABH CT si 4@o sneer JPTIN teq apg.

It cr
AQTITA
“{4IVeTIG TD OT

MATTATR “OTT uN A TNC EE TTA
| .

: moe ePTLT MITA COST TAL VO BRTTTG9 yO aEs aT

eTAt ghO MFA CFT FIA LIA OT ITE

ATHAC AN IMOLIOR QM OVOOIMUES OO TFMISPATTT OT Treeayg
TU ATSOA ARAN ATA TAA MOTATVLG REEVEIUNS OT BTATE =
PEATTAS CH POT ILLISTIPPATUUOD Oe C2P) YTINUOFA JAN STI

CID Sf @ RE 27 Ch) THEW 210 ME g2PO CE, OME Te

m m™
C1) TIE ¢T7 ee gaT Ee? Cty THT A gis Vierat ech) Ty e™
o>

aces mon Sey mapa
e Pl PA CED TAU STD Dh , BE RE (1) Tena ‘ie Sead &
% wot ws ” 5
e190 % g2T U1 C1) THR, g17 er gtr WE) Ee 719 7
. 3 "= 7
on eft

2 Oe en
NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 341 le oe | ls 35 as


ad

Assoc. Dir, |

«FEDERAL aunsAU OF INVESTIGATION 3 ) Dea De

7 ep AD eemeeree

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION ee Asst. Dir:
Adiain.

MAR 2 5 1975 C mp. Syst, |

. , 1% a Qs atts —

NR 925 ME PLAHI ig | Cl biG yi
y TELETYDE | Se |

9:12 PM NITE MARCH 25, 1975 JLG ir GA
nt 2, ane |

. . Dale rv wo

TO D IRECTOR ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECT ION Pian. Ew
Spee. lave 2.

FROM MEMPHIS raining
Legal Coun. ..—....
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACT IVITIES , Decehone Rim. =|
irector See’y —__

REBUTEL MARCH 24, 1975,

SUPERVISOR *S TIME IN THE SECURITY FIELD, 2@ PERCENT ON INTERNAL
SECURITY AND 5 PERCENT ON OOUNTERINTELL IGENCE.

IN ADDITION, SIX AGENTS ARE UTILIZED, THE FOLLOWING TABLE
SHOWING PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL TIME SPENT BY THESE AGENTS IN THIS

FIELD:
TIME ON TIME ON TIME ON
SECIRITY INT ER NAL 00 UNTER = Pe
AGENT CASES SECIR ITY INTELL IGENCE
A 198 198 8
B B 56 25
c 5B 5B B :
D 50 25 25 a y
E 25 25 B id
F 25 6 25

IN ADDITION TO THE ONE-FOURTH SUPER VISOR TIME, THIS OFFICE
USES THE EQUIVALENT OF THREE AND ONE-FOURTH AGENTS IN THE SECURITY

Why

NW 80296 Docld:32989625 Page 342

PAGE TWO
FIELD; TWO AND ONE-HALF AGENTS ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND THE

EQUIVALENT OF THREE- FOURTH S OF ONE AGENT ON COUNTERINTELL IGENCE,

END _ =
PLS ACK FOR FOUR TES
ACK FOR 4 AND HOLD

TJT FBI WASH DC

NW 60296 Docid:32989628 Page 343
Lo

“4 a
ragga re ee ee
I if om me '
: he . ‘ .
. boot ,
toe
yy ie cr Cal
5 toy . woe
a, ' ‘
~ oat 1 , .

|

cole

ny we oe em ty

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Pagé 144. bAa- HOS {5 Slo ;

,
. ot
f “4
1
'
?
'
,
4
yoy
oo t
n


i assoc. Diz,

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTICATION - Dep-A.D.-Adm..... §
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION ER | BepaDein— |

Admin.

BAR ATS com Se — |
“* Files & Com. —f
NROOZ MM CODE TELETYPE Gon, Inv. _ 3

925AM URGENT MARCH 27, 1975 JWB
TO DIRECT OR

FROM MIAMI IP

Telephone Rm
ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION

| Director Sec’y |
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL SACS, MARCH 24, 1975.

FOLLOWING ARE MIAMI OFFICE STATISTICS SHOWING PERCENTAGES
OF TIME ASSIGNED TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE (CD MATTERS AND INTERNAL
SECURITY (IS) MATTERS BY SPECIAL AGENT PERSONNEL:

SACS = 0; ASACS = 0.

SUPERVISORS - CI MATTERS: ONE ASSIGNED 90 PERCENT; ONE
ASSIGNED 5 PERCENT. SI MATTERS: ONE ASSIGNED 50 PERCENT; ONE
ASSIGNED 5 PERCENT.

SPEC IAL agENTS- CI MATTERS: 15 ASSIGNED FULL TIME; TWO
ASSIGNED 50 PERGENT; ONE ASSIGNED 40 PERCENT; ONE ASSIGNED 5
PERCENT. IS MATTERS: TWO ASSIGNED FULL TIME; THREE ASSIGNED
75 PERCENT; ONE ASSIGNED 60 PERCENT; ONE ASSIGNED 50 PERCENTS a

ONE ASSIGNED 30 PERCENT; FIVE ASSIGNED 10 PERCENT.
END.

JDR
FBIH@ CLR e


1 ame ATA“ parte yay
“eryte sy Rameaeye
ar RAGS

he .

n .

_ Nw 88296" Docld:32989628 Page-346_ : “U2-) (639 s- SB. a . 7

wets Asse Dir. at
3 3 Dep.-A.D.-Adm—.
HUESAL BUREAU QF INVESTIGATION Dep-A.D.-Inv.__—

NR@O4 ME CODE COMMUNICATIONS SECTION Ae
z Corap, Syst. —— :
73:08PM NITEL’ 3 / 25 / 75 LSK WAR 2 29 Mo Ext. Affairs — |
Po OS . Piles * Gom, —
OF a DIRECTOR ot re SUS Gen. Inv. —.——

os
4 if ia Ident. 2... one

=] ales 8

Inspestion
FROM: MILWAUKEE (66-NEW) Intel
Laboratory ———~

. Plan. & Eval
ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION Spee. Inv.

Tr ining f

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES Leual Coun oF
Telephone een ~

,

REBUNITEL TO ALL SAC'S, MARCH 24, 1975.6 Bi

ve prion

MILWAUKEE HAS 2 SECURITY SUPERVISORS, #5 AND #6, NEITHER OF ees
WHOM IS ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO SECURITY WORK» 23 AGENTS ARE V

ASSIGNED TO THESE 2 SECURITY SQUADS, INCLUDING HEADQUARTERS AND
RESIDENT AGENTS (RA‘S). 4 OF LATTER ARE ENGAGED FULL TIME IN
| SECURITY WORK. 15 ADDITIONAL RESIDENT AGENTS NOT ASSIGNED TO
EITHER SECURITY SQUAD ALSO HANDLE SOME SECURITY WORK IN THEIR

VARIOUS AREAS. PERCENTAGE BREAKDOWN IS AS FOLLOWSs

JL INTERNAL SECURITY COINTEL OTHER
#5 SUPERVISOR. 78 5 25
#6 SUPERVISOR 30 55 L5
#5 SQUAD IQezextS” 59 g 33
#6 SQUAD IJ age7t* 44 44 L2
RA'S [3 cond’ * 205 445 93

END
ACJ FOR FOUR $$$

x pp; Dee abt Gin, PIS wth Rowe Wh oxen,
ls porviser of ee equa! Y L900 star wee,

ave
Is it ioe

~ T0H ros Bf 4 ,
° gone Z
pone we SEN Py ees BD 7 / pee |
se pd
“G, j '

DAia

' NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page 347


4 Pe agua Wha +
ee, ee . | HBL eT ag\ & daeps squat
fy a ne _ a owes F 149:
- - : Oo ‘ hot “Comedoy" samen. 8 4 se
a . . _ sattoae oirTuboae 1a Thay, sNouricatA

re a saitwiiok angeatuustan # it J sukir se wocz pe
eo nt es, sehen ERS’ HORAN gs stone I 31 ST iPad: | wg
mat) Fast ist go" Gi Sy gl. RD2 7 W2-VPEAuge gov BSW
| onan "at rBon és seta yresuazh or acre 207 GAUDTE 26 BT LOL |
Oo) Gna seapeausgagy ertaysony gaddusa verve 3 doast-ot uEsaesh
oo os Ser auua ageae3t aps, ATG! Woo, hay erlang AugeTeRh
foe _ gs caueEseg, Tod, eTaza » Tagardas AAROUTLOGA <1 how vrtayozs
oo  RESHR GD yin arf wrbatvo 938, a4 SITIO OB IA ‘aio Viens arate’.
Hoe Bea 2500 £163 A 31 wsnazag BE PATSODAEA, saidnmg Sun taw"
: r % a Ie re ~ rn £5 te
aa RINTO “auraxéy STD 382 dACAITYL Fy SE
a rs: et, sp. geri ge
\ aa ete wo RUB TY ATS oy
SS og go AU GS”
Se “op ; Abe GAUIa a
Bn an” ZS ; 2A |
a ne
PP AUON ROY baa
4 o ‘ | 7 ‘ . : oe 7 hy of
. 1 i ; na ' > :
am |


Ascoe, Dir, _
Dep.-A.D.-Adm_
Dep-A.D.-Inv,
Asst. Dir:

Admin,

Comp. Syst, __~
Gxt, Affairs __
Files & Con. __
Gen. Inv.
Ident. _ eee
Insmection .

ntch oo.
Lsboratory _
: Plan, & Eval, _
| Spee. Inv.

Training

NROGL MP CODED |” Legal Coan

Telephone yy,
72:13 PM NIT EL MARCH 25, 1975 DSC ~~
TO (
D ARECTOR wa C

Director Lee'y
FROM /MINNEAPOLIS (€19@-NEW)

ete on BUDGET AND ACOOUNTING SECTION
NATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELL IGENCE ACTIVITIES,

\

re eee,

Oe lie

RE BUTEL TO ALL SAC'S, MARCH 24, 1975,
MINNEAPOLIS HAS ONE SUPERVISOR WHO SPENDS 5@ PER CENT OF HIS
TIME ON INTERNAL SECIRITY AND 59 PER CENT OF HIS TIME ON
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE, A SECOND SUPERVISOR SPENDS 4@ PER CENT OF HIS
TIME ON INTERNAL 'SECIR ITY, THERE ARE FIVE AND ONE HALF AGENTS
WOR KING COUNLER INFELL IGENCE AND 14 WORKING INTERNAL SECURITY.

END

L

NW 88296 Docid:32969628 Page 349

. ‘y . . . . ; , ay i ww! m
hts rn 7h
; a " ' ’ ' vy
ot oy .
- ‘ , a 1
. ’ my er Pe Tae ep mone ork
. ‘ ‘ . 3 . ' .
4 1 , a at oe
: TPP TUT A Steam ep eae ore ry
le , ar ne , ate oy
t . . . . rf . , . my
4 rota ‘ ’ . .
. aan) . 1 e - LeaSE 2 Ve a oo ee at
Sey toe _ -«@ . a : ‘
. 1 , 7 on ' ‘
; a a Pe coaire, Deep om Ne nei +. rom, “Amer ;
_ _ 1 ; ty : eof, * , ,
. , . : :
. 1 . thoes ‘
. 4 wo, ee ek anes ak rs ie ed ae os ea Oe Te eager
t . - rt . a=
4 , ‘4 ‘at ‘ u . . : ' hots
a od opea ne cm oat le . y
’ ‘7 74 me “ rege oe me gta MAD Py rege ome meaty 4
6 te, ‘ ‘ . 1 * + . ‘ “ .

omega en

1 ‘ Ramet tance ee .
rot we ‘oy ect ee, “T mIAg
. : ;
. mi ' '
. ' , + . ,
? ‘ .
‘ ty : Ct fp aA or ;
. t 4 '
‘ .
r ’ ; . _
. . : : ue;
sae z ; ; . oe .
' * at ' ot a? oot “
‘ _— . vf ,
. ‘ 1 yet
' . por a 4 :
. , . ' ws 7 .
ae. . a . -
‘ ry bee > . '
rn 1 '
, * ‘ ‘ .
an moos
. ' . . .
- : ry ,
. + » .
re » . tt a , \ _
oy vo ' te . cr i
‘ ; ;
' 1 : te tet 4
’ ‘ ' ” toa \ .
. ” . . * . .
1 , . . uv .
sofas t - : wwe ot
, 1 , . . . .
‘ ‘ you . . :
: ' _ . 1 t , ,
. of ‘ 1 . . i
’ . . ;
. . wy . : .
, vs ‘ "he, . '
ter _ wt ' , or .
. , oy 1 . . t - t. ,
‘ . . ‘ aoe .
. ‘ . ee
: . : ’ : . -_
ooo ar : : : , .
the : ' / . ;
troy prog, : . . . , 7 ' .
be . , ¥ : ao 7 ;
oa : '
‘ ,
1 a ' t on

NW 88296 ‘Docld:32989628 Page 350 - leQ-'l| 39S ~S

PL ET

sie

t t
_
oot
ny, .
+
yo
* '
:
Ae
ro
toa

-


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION "Assoc. Dir.

CORMUTIICATIONS SECTION as Dep-ADo Ade —
v7 Asst. Din:
wana 5S i
TELETYPE Files & Com. —
NROOS MOBILE PLAIN aah
11-12 PM NITEL MARCH 26,1975 VFP ole
Laboratory
TO DIRECT oi ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION on an

FROM MOBILE (66-1145)

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

Training ————

Legal Coun. .——~
Telephone Rm. —
Director Sec’y —

wet ago? J
RE BUTEL TO ALL SACS, MARCH 24,1975. Vig 0 so!

THE MOBILE DIVISION HAS ONE SUPERVISOR SPENDING FIFTY
PERCENT OF TIME SUPERVISING INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS; ONE
AGENT WHO SPENDS TWENTYF IVE PERCENT OF TIME ON COUNTERINTELLI-
GENCY MATTERS; ONE AGENT WHO SPENDS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF TIME
ON INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS, THERE ARE NINE AGENTS WHO SPEND

AN AVERAGE OF FORTY FIVE PERCENT OF THEIR TIME ON INTERNAL
SECURITY MATTERS
END

TMA ACK FOR TWO FBIHQ CLR

~ NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 351

2.
Oph


Te StWe aL:

a re

b

<e

2 7 MEET

. VED «
foo ty E TELETYPEAUNIT ~,

oe

wee

f
«

Page 352 ..

32989628.

NW 88296 Docld

q


Assoc, Dir, ww.
Dep.-A.D~AdM. am
Dep-A.D.-Envy.nes
Asst. Dir:

Admin, |
Comp. Syst. 1
Ext. Affairs ..
Files & Com. —
| Gen. Inv,
§ Ident. wn. ee
j Inspection 4
Mitel, ey 3

a _ y

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
; COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

MA 1975
NR O87 NK CODE me
6:06PM URGENT MARCH 26, 1975 JCB TELETYPE

‘4
TO D TRE.CI OR

y Laboratory _.. !
5 Plau. & Eval.

*N: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION deal ¥ Training |
(us Gua, fo ¥ Legal Coun, es !
FROM NEWARK OAR4 Director Seey’ |

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUNITEL TO SAC'S MARCH 24, 1975,

IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS SET FORTH IN RE NITEL
NEWARK SUBMIT S FOLLOWING BREAKDOWN OF AGENT PERSONNEL ASSIGNED
TO INTERNAL SECIRIT Y AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS AND
PER CENTAGE OF TIME SPENT BY PERSONNEL IN THE TWO SEPARATE
CATEGORIES:

INTERNAL SECIRIT Ys:
1 ASAC = 15 PER CENT
{ SUPERVISOR - 54 PER CENT

7 SA'S - 160 PER CENT
7 SA°’S - 70 PER CENT

NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 353

NK

PAGE TWO
COUNTER INTELLIGENCE:

{ ASAC - 35 PER CENT
{1 SUPERVICSOR ~ 59 PER CENT
1 SUPERVISOR ~ 19@ PER CENT
23 SA "S = !@@ PER CENT
6 SA'S - 54 PER CENT
3 SA°S = 19 PER CENT

END

Fad

pore

dha

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 354


Rae te at

. : “ ‘ ety tT {POT m sims eas
a ye 7 bailed wa TPIT t
, iat aie Se ar Uy wa ae yo e
‘ i .
ou te, - ot * t _ ww wire gemtreys ry
. .
als om = t “= od woe .
; : ‘ fe en eh, ~
: , , '
1 aE het ce ees Tove "tre ”
' ete :
. ao
‘ ” m7 lsaed
’ mn oo or
Tl gry ;
=F
a7
: a ea oe
qm F
. =o a a
wo penn pe .
. + won " . ,
. = 2 ses ‘
. Lud
: \
4 . .
- v
‘
’ :
* f
‘
. s . . . ' : ‘ .
ry . : ,
‘ . . ¥ 7
. Se "e + + "
‘ " ” an ,
”
. . . ‘
‘ , .
,
‘
‘
.

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 355


Assoc. Dir, mew Hf

Dep.-A.D-Admunas |f

Dep-A.D.-Inv.— seen I

Asst. Dir:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION tb ndrnin,
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION | Comp, Svat —
trae WH CODE |
Ident. eee
1038PM NITEL MARCH 25,1975 LM ef Views un.
ee A Int
éT01 TEL : Le SLR Y ee ee 1
708 PARECTOR { Plan. & Eval. —
FROMs NEW HAVEN (1805-13579) CRUC) IP j rene |
} Legal Coun.
ATINs BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION '

Felephone Rm. . §

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

REBUTEL MARCH 24,1975,

ONE SUPERVISORY AGENT DEVOTES ONE-THIRD OF HIS TIME TO
COUNTERI NTELLIGENCE AND ONE THIRD TO INTERNAL SECURITY.

SEVENTEEN AGENTS ARE REGULARLY ASSIGNED EITHER COUNTERINTELLI-
GENCE OR INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS IN ADDITION TO OTHER CLASSIFICA-
TIONS. OF THESE 17 AGENTS THE EQUIVALENT OF FIVE AGENTS WORK
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS FULL TIMW AND FIVE AND ONE THIRD

AGENTS WORK INTERNAL SECURITY.
END

FBTHQ@ FLC FR TwO TELS CLR TKS

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 356

WA sDirector Sec’y —_ fl.

ay

NW 882965

rye rea eon ee Log tf oom ws - eye oye .
TILE" wee whee ok ys a bse oak ede *

ers d rt Fs Lo ot Tht 2a Tbs aG DT 03
a t
> - 2 ~ ee as + . - - tie gee r wi neg ee,
ott TUre. eae ‘i JL™ aon whew et fl: wf - ‘ one arc . v ae Tey

haa:
_

Ge Hd & ‘ ,

e

me,
to}
tag
“s

*

das

_
~~

aiytie

4"
&
.

Likn adALa
Lf
ft.

~s . os sate id pero. on . ". se pee
we tase Ln reer WI. FO iT Jat foe wtT A! au Tad te gobo
ase - v. ae ov tee 8 me «
etlld. Pol weber OW LS I inte tigsn :
. sen
aff vi . | i wah

1
”

“Slo

Docld:32989628 Page 357 ipa ~| Io SIs


oe FObEAE CAPRA ie sSiyesetiatioy 36
PAMMEMIPATIANS cEeyIAg a

MAR 2G WS
NRGBL NO CODE re

2:49PM URGENT WaRcH 26, 1975 vcd EERE VME: | Be um |
Tor DIREC FE , (| patos |
FROM: SACS NEW ORLEANS (66-2832) Budd! Rect. | tanst |
arreang ever AND ACCOUNTING SECTION RE} Fo af | Spee. ine, —— f

SENATE SELECT COMMITIEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE BUREAU NITEL MARCH 24, 1975.

NUMBER OF SUPERVISORS ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY (1S)
MATTERS, ONE; NUMBER OF AGENTS ASSIGNED TO IS MATTERS, TVELVEs
PERCENTAGE OF AGENT TIME SPENT ON IS MATTERS, 60 PERCENT;
PERCENTAGE. OF SUPERVISORY TIME SPENT ON IS MATTERS, 60 PERCENT:
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS,
END MESSAGE...

MAH FBIHQ ACK FOR ONE
WA CLR

. 20
Netet Q@eorty; Su per rt mr foto -¥ef SP, Yo of 7 re
counter ri tb g Pye weber s, tHe wt checks + 20oF-
The obyious srrn er cnt] ¥o ft, 2 Thar Tarsus, cot hack
PO —

a 7. ae, eof /¢ red,
2,
(pd

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 _

Page 358

pte eee

§ Asses Pir. 4
Dep.-A.D.~Adm.— &
i Dep-A U-Inv._— #
Asst }i: ‘
F Adcnin.

§ Conm Syet. —wW bi

Legal Coun, m= Fi
i Telephone Rut. am f
Director Sec’y at


atte
toes

ata

32989628 Page 359 GR-|1L29S-Sl


Agroe, Dir
Done A.Dx Adit
Dep-A.DuDnv inn
Asst. Diy:

Adin
Carp. Syite ce

FEDERAL BULEAY OF INVESTIGATION
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

» Ext, Affat —

MAR 27 1975 m5 Com,

1 TC

| rerio ao

WRGiS NO CODE .” Coot

‘ Feo. : ivak

7:15PM wa MARCH 27,1975 JMF Bo ann

Lesal Comm,

TO DIRECTOR, FBI . Teleptone BL
FROM SAC, NEW ORLEANS (66-2832) Le dey :
arrentzow: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION Ou Oe |

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUREAU NITEL MARCH 24,1975; NEW ORLEANS TELETYPE
MARCH 26,19753 BUTEL CALL MARCH 27,1975.

THE FOLLOWING ARE CORRECTIONS TO REFERENCED NEW ORLEANS
TELETYPE. NUMBER OF SUPERVISORS ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY
CIs) AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS, ONE$ NUMBER OF AGENTS
ASSIGNED TO:tS MATTERS, TWELVE, OF WHICH SEVEN ARE ALSO
ASSIGNED TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS, PERCENTAGE OF AGENT
TIME SPENT ON IS MATTERS, 25 PERCENT AND PERCENTAGE OF AGENT
TIME SPENT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS 35 PERCENT. PERCENTAGE
OF SUPERVISORY TIME SPENT ON IS MATTERS 25 PERCENT, AND 35
PERCENT SPENT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS,

rab
END MESSAGE. co
DBS FBIH@ CLR qe net
Ye phere

' Vhs

NW 88296 Docid:327989628 Page 360

re dp ganty on
-« . 1 ,
an *. t4 mei, : : : re ’ ‘ ¥ " a j
ee enters! ¢ mee) eb Ot wg
_ / . diEV. wrt Sega dua yevyods Sow k ae \,
; ; > . > : \ ‘ b
SOSTEIV TT es Oe CLE Toe agadberin dargea oe
. 1 . . .
| ae Oe?
. fatal EClTethe oC
S,
= .
arn Ait NEI
. e ‘
, va one? ;

‘

det

“a
je . ” .
at ™ ag ; i
., oN, Ack eS
r ‘ -
, .
. . or ema ey cae pe
: : a OED ve -
. . .
s
: Mp at rm. of
Tarfos » .
rn Pre Stn
‘it “belt 8, 1 *
: :
. ” “ie ¥7 Caive.
. . '
. . 1 cn Ot -
wee . a . .
oa fey
; ; a a a
‘ ‘ . :
, 4? . . : ;
. * * . : ‘ Bole
z . , . : a e oak
. . . ’ ‘ yt . >" ‘ ‘ ‘ .
: ety . oars y , soo . ”
. : soe nd . ee wt
. . oof > ™ a , . ‘ |
: ta a . >, ' < . . 1 ‘ :
aoe, . Loe ‘ t : : . .
. . eg vf fos . yt ,
n ats . : ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ i ‘
. * ‘ . , ‘ , ;
. te ta . ‘
" * . ' + " ‘ : 7
4 ad . . rea ‘ ‘ .
. Wh, : vt + : eo8 . "
. . ~ ' te at . ,
. : . . . . a , hs Ta . ut.
: soy : . . * uo . ,
. ' . oa sf we vu °
. ' . * ' - . ot _ .
; . . . on "

NW 88296. Docld:32989628 Page 361 - aren

Wa Shee

1 ; ened We Ok a ee ee Oe 0


Assoc, Dir, am |i +

D BD AGM anes ‘
3 q Dep Dein.
—_—— Asst. Ding -
Adyiin, nem fT
NR@@3 NY CODE FEDERAL OUNEAU OF INVESTIGATION Cen. Systy —
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION Ext oe
NIVEL 3/25/75 SENT 9:25AM 3/26/75 GMD Gon, Inv. —-—— If
° MAR 2 6 (975 Ident. ——
Oe DIRECTOR, FBI a7 natal
‘ Laboratory —~—— i |
FROM: SAC, NEW YORK TEL E Plow. & Bval — I
Spee. Inv. ———~ |}
ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION reining
elephone Rm.
SENATE SELECT OOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES, Bases —~F
RE BUREAU TELETY PE, MARCH 24, 1975. Burke ae
NEW YORK HAS ONE SAC ASSIGNED TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE lec oF - ae
MATTERS MIVISION III) AND ONE SAC ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL S rp 2 & Jer
SECURITY MATTERS @IVISION Iv),

THERE ARE NO ASACS IN NEW YORK
OFFICE.

SAC, COUNTER INTELLIGENCE DIVISION CIID SPENDS FULL-TIME
ON COUNTER.INTELLIGENCE MATTERS.

SAC, “INTERWAL SECURITY DIVISION (IV) SPENDS 4@ PERCEMT
OF HIS TIME ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS AND 60 PERCENT IS
SPENT ON INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS.

SIX SUPERVISORS HANDLE INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS AND
14 SUPERVISORS HANDLE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES,

114 AGENTS ARE ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS AND

331 AGENTS ARE ASSIGNED TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS.
END.

JTG FBIHQ CLR

NW?)88296 Docid:32989628 Page 362


| NW 88

woot mse me ae mm o ff os
'
:
vp rp em ee np cmt ep tm pe tw
.
ct em o
sos ay Layee seem eee ep oma
e . e »
wee pet pe mp wey ter Std eek adh cn aed Cr dees © 2 ee vey wee
rr a a OR pe pe tien
ee ay tyne wee yee can Ne Ty ae Rt nee
@ . oeceeat .
a
oe .
mr rm 2 '
a *) re
Mi py
mom p ee corty tems ene cs payee AB
_<“m
ma
oes Aoi “yee vam TH rer bade ong remy ba
e vee * a -
i )
ped
a r
tet " Pr rT ar 7 ae SE ee el ae Te cre et a
~*~
nd
Ct
oY al att oC fem oe ew Se mm ee yee lm em ny ”~A - +o? “ae my
sR ms vm te 5 i i ad ao
s 1
See meme pe men tee espe rg oe
“op ap Re te “OAT Pp es 8 foes, or, ao . ’
: .
wee - dae ade a ood rye t ro ne ee be aie a “br
Lm tg aw me py pie mmmpeer we ph pee Pon eee ge
.
e
'
A-) |=
. ~ "Ce AT oe
296 Docld:327989628 Page 363 ae rein


F +O & Assoc. Dix, 1
: § 'Dep.-A.D~Adm._
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION _— Deol Daley

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION dis Bis
fo Abana wu |
NR 902 NF PLAIN | MAR 2 6 187 | Bat te —
AAAPM NITEL-S-26-75 SNB TELETYPE j Sayre
TO ee =
FROM NORFOLK (66-981) fe (ad Of Spe ia '

4 Legal Coun, —_
1 Telephone Rm _
Director Sea’y

ATTENTION BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECT ION
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.
REBUTEL TO ALL OFFICES MARCH 24, 19°75.
FOLLOWING IS INFORMATION REQUEST) IN RETELs
PO SIT ION INTERNAL SECIRITY COUNT ER INTELL IG ENCE
ONE SUPERVISOR 54 PER CENT OF TIME 1% PER CENT OF TIME

THREE SAS 59 PER CENT OF TIME 24 PER CENT OF TIME
TyO Sas 75 PER CENT OF TIME @
THREE SAS 59 PER CENT OF TIME B

TOTAL AGENT PERSONNEL OF NORFOLK OFFICE ASSIGNED IS ONE
SUPERVISOR AND EIGHT AGENTS FOR PERCENTAGES INDICATED ABOVE,

END ~
DBS FBIH@ CLR

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 364

q
H .
jf
.
.
oot
. ‘
.
.
* 1

|

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 365

; rete ome ae
‘
. ' ’ rp Nyt iv ro a
; .
wee mel! Se od lod ee
. Se Siar atte pear ot er Ae a eo wo weet ee,
. . sof , oo a oo .
. . ‘ AE AE PEN Set pee es re ae perry
. ‘ : ¢ er, . : coe
. . . . ‘ , .
. ‘ Pe cela ee Ro Oe I RTM eps +7 nepTent mr
. - . . a
. . . ‘ ‘ . an
MRC UTNE PPT nme an ee poe erecag . A ep aT
. ar . :
cl. Me nes one moe a A od on moses xt al Typ mene mw em
a 2 a or Smet my oer eee my Le - oy cone tT ee hee
, « me * .
. . hoe Ean Pn
m fane pm ne Pree ow ete . Pd at
‘ * -

27 om

Lact an
. On aes

: at

ot A oe ~ : .

eye

opey pts

o>

on

MAY OT vem TB
cad Secs yea mw :

wn are BS

ato om ae Can

&

R

ae. ‘
_

A %. Trym ree
> ra
—_ <= .
ees! —
> a est :
3 . * my
‘ ‘ ‘ .
‘ - ‘ er oe
ye 7 - t
. , oy c ‘
. x
. a
oe . . ot
x .
. ‘ Loe eo
) . , . . .
. : ‘ . .
‘ ‘ .
. ty . , . vo . :
. cyte wae . . .
- + . ’
' + ‘
‘ . . . . an .
' . ‘ : ‘
. . aan) : : ° . ‘ .
oof ’ ‘ oman . : ‘ : . .
‘ . . 7 . ‘ . . .
‘ ‘or .
. : . . : .
. . oO . , . . «
» ™ . Of . " .
‘ ’ . cs . tos

OZ LB9S-S6


Assoc. Dir,

ae

x D - =
Dow FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION T) | Dep, ie
NR@O8 OC PLAIN COMMUNICATIONS SECTION == | set bin
i Luin, a

“ 9:30PM MARCH 25,-1975 NITEL DSM NSAP AGS S075
TO DIRECTOR Te B (Cn ‘ .
LETYPE NOK oa
Lier

FROM OKLAHOMA CITY (195-2398)

ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACOOUNTING SECTION

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. Pr
y Lost ¢ Coan.

REBUTEL MARCH 24, 1975. {pice som |
=
THE SAC AND THE ASAC OF THE OMLAHOMA CITY OFFICE ARE NOT

ASSIGNED INTERNAL SECURITY OR COUNTERINTELL IGENCE MATTERS. THE
OKLAHOMA CITY OFFICE HAS NO SUPERVISOR OR SPECIAL AGENT ASIGNED
FULL TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY AND / OR COUNTERINTELL IGENCE
MATTERS,

FOLLOWING IS A BREAKDOWN IN PERCENTAGES OF SUPERVISOR AND
AGENT ’S TIME SPENT ON INTERNAL SECIR ITY AND COUNTERINTELL IGENCE

MATTERS:

NUMBER INTERNAL SECURITY “COUNT ERINTELL IGENCE
SUPER VISOR 1 75 5
SA'S 31 615 6

OF THE TH IRTY-ONE SPECIAL AGENT S, IT IS NOTED THAT 8 ARE
ASSIGNED 5@ PERCENT OR MORE OF THEIR TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND
COUNTER INTELLIGENCE MATTERS BUT ACCOUNT FOR 559 PERCENT OT THE

615 PERCENT INTERNAL SECURITY TIME AND 62 PERCENT OT THE 65 PERCENT
OF COUNTER INTELLIGENCE TIME,

END PAGE Joe, ail ssi
aac
“i ae std
i ~ nate S
: ole co

NW 68296 Docld:32989620 Page 166


PAGE 2

OC 195-2398

IN SUMMARY, THERE IS .75 AND .@5 SUPERVISORY EQUIVALENT

TIME SPENT ON INTERNAL SECIRITY AND COUNTERINTELL TEGENCE,
RESPECTIVELY. THERE ARE 6.15 AND .65 AGENT EQUIVALENT TIME

SPENT ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELL IGENCE, RESPECTIVELY.
END |

ACK FOR 1 TJT FBI WASH DC G —

vd

-

Docid:32989628 Page 367

Atom gy

Lh ere Pala a

ae
ar

Ent reas
rs .
REA ee EN tN [AM toe

res
Sey tee
vo at

SAND Tipe rein

EU peep ter

oe aye

fy ne
Sr oi er. or

e =
end
oo

.” inn enh ee Oe ee Saad oe)
PoP me rerepre Mn TAA RL mth TE on
Poet 1 dies Bont at - sae ae aor wey ort gant ne omy
pimvrr 7 ey Tr re im ae
Pe -
am
& -
Sy
ye SS
Be mR pam

STMT Peyote caer Pala) nt

bpR-|1639S-Se

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 368


summers anced
Assoc, Jir, 2
Dep.-A.D.-Adm.__.
Dep.-A.D.-Inv,__.
Asst. Dir:
Admin.
Comp. Syst.
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com.
Gen. Inv.
Ident. oo,
Inspection
Iniall.
Laboratory ..__.
Plan. & Eval,
Spee. Inv.
Training
Legal Coun. ww &
Telephone Rm. .
Director Seely of

FEDERAL BUREAU OF invEsTig —
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

MAR 28 1975
AD.
TELEVYPE

NR 984 OM CODE

4338 PM NITEL 3/25/75 BJP

TOs DIRECTOR

FROM: omata WA
ATTENTION ¢ BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL OFFICES MARCH 24, 1975.
OMAHA CURRENTLY HAS SEVEN AGENTS ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO

INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS, WITH TwO AGENTS SPENDING 66 PER
CENT AND TWO AGENTS SPENDING 25 PER CENT OF THEIR TIME ON
IS MATTERS, ONE SUPERVISOR SPENDS APPROXIMATELY. 58 PER CENT
OF HIS TIME ON IS MaTTERS.

TwO AGENTS AND ONE SUPERVISOR SPEND APPROXIMATELY 18 PER
CENT OF THEIR TIME ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS.
END
MSE FBIKQ

NW 68296 Docid:37989678 Page 369

ores Oe St a ee

. wel sZt Boa,
. . ms —

7 - : a . . rs tT .
- : 7 . . TES hz od Pe times
. ‘ 2 “of . oa . _ mr: . :
, _ , bed re a Uh cee be eed LS k oe ‘
ee SEEN de ee ee ded OG be dag Ce
. eyed ent Veter, 2G wR TEMAO he kk bd be ee ow AR ee

: .

oe a A 7 Ss SY a © 2 OT Oe ORGS OE OO POL 2 SO

' *
’ on . .

Beth wl be wed Pebaw qee pda rae Eda cee ea we ee
. ‘ , 7 Me mn o os . ° .f : - . me, .
. CC See ee ote ae SO So 7 de OS CO Se 2
_ Lee cee Mahe tee bt hevrees ae Gh ane bee Ste ries 1 oes wad howe eh
7 ' : . ’ woe . e. . 1 “ . . a wy
my ot _— . a Ou, Bhalis Uh ne wie Ad ha ie

‘ . eto oe . ' ra ‘ te Otol an .
ou 4 ’ 70 . - fo aa
we ce a er Sr wean a fee AM eB tah ' *

7 . yt ‘ 2 t .

TR gee hae ok ee teehee dd Odean ee ee eae bk ae tiie Ti she

7 : ‘ . Lt oe
: , . . . . .
ok ny . ’ ,
. ’ '
t \ . . .
. : 4 .
, , . ”
- oo - ‘ ,
. "yt
, : ,
. ‘ aa ,
‘ + an - .
‘ : , : “, oa
: . ‘ . , . .
i : i ar poof .
- , ‘ . my ‘ Oo f
toe : ' . ray
. . . ” .
oy . .
. Cork 4 a . .
' oo. . ' . ‘ et .
os . . ‘ : .
. . ‘ .
' ,


Assoc. Dir.

b “3 Dep-A.D-Adm_.. |
\ =
FEDERAL BUNKAU OF INVESTIGATION
cot COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
MAR 26 1975 Go.
ah Tir wha |
TELETYPE —

NR 002 PH CODE

eT,
Legal Cru. ance

245 PM URGENT MARCH 26, 1975 DMS
. Telephone Rm.  ¥

TO: DIRECTOR
FROM: | / PHILADELPHIA (66-NEW CP) o Buch
ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECT ION
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

REBUTEL, MARCH 24, 1975.

PHILA DIVISION UTILIZES FOLLOWING PERSONNEL ON INTERNAL

SECURITY (IS) INCLUDING EXTREMISTS, AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE (CI)
MAT TERS:

1s cl
1 sac = =
1 ASAC 50.

1 SUPERVISOR 100.

| SUPERVISOR 100

; ="

13 SAS’ AT HEADQUARTERS 100

1 SA AT HEADQUARTERS 50

9 SAS AT HEADQUARTERS 100
1 SA AT HEADQUARTERS 75
1 SA AT HEADQUARTERS 85

NW 60296 Doclhd:32989628 Page 371


PH 66-NEW PAGE Two
THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTS SAS IN RAS:

is CI
{ isa 5

1 SA 45 45

i SA 2 2

1 SA 50 25

1 SA 30 10

1 SA 75 20

1 SA 5 70

1 SA. 2 5

1Ssa > 70 30

Isa o> 10
1 Sf: i 5 10

1 SA, 55 15

1 SA 5 1

1 SA I 5

1 SA 35 50

1 SA 5 3

IN SUMMARY, 16 RAS AVERAGED 24 Is, AND 19 Cl.
END
KAC FBIHQ CLR

NW 88296 Docid:32969628 Page 372
yY


gALa VSL
Qqu-

BAIA

m™m
at . sare 7? . - + . : , : rr ‘ - ear’
. . : i . . . eet » 5 1 " s * .
.o . . ' " y wey ‘
pees - : ye t oe
' . , ot : . : . , . ‘ - “yt 4 .
. . . ot , a t «3 ’
ne os erg ai. + . fee
an a . a - Roo. i 4 ;
Soy —_ , 2a. ‘ v . . . s wa
, tae _ . an Te, . i , '
oe : : . ‘ - . af, uot _ vt , .* . .
. : : a cv ae ft ; moog a _ 1 woe a woe a 7 z
. 7 . 7, . 7 . . 4 mya
, . . . ‘ - wy . ‘ . ° . . . ‘ .
p . foot rn nt tas oa Say . enna)
te _ : : an " . . Hor tt te soos
: me . , 7 on . . ” . 4 Pan 4 * : +7 ‘ . .
. we sone , ' Sot ‘ i . ‘ ,
. . ‘ _ 7 whe . . . . , . 1, ‘ , oa
ie . . . a ot ‘ wu fo . : ‘4 .
. . : f : * .
NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page373.- - (Bard | [434 mee


PAs. Din

Der-A.D~Admo_ |

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION yu Dene “A.D. 5S 5 s\n |

\ COMMUNICATIONS SECTION ee AE Dis
5 c- cap. Bye ou:
™ te 21975 Ex’ . Aifaizs —_?

ree fvee

NR 003 PX PCODE
12335 AM MARCH 26, 1975 NITEL JRL
TO DIRECTORAATIN BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECT)

Legal Coan. WF
Pelephowe Rm —, f
Direstor See’y

FROM PHORWIX (100-8529) CIP)
SENATE<SELECT COMMITEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE BUNITEL MARCH 24, 1975.
PHOENIX DIVISION HAS FOLLOWING AGENT PERSONNEL ASSIGNED

INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE WATTERS:
Q. INTERNAL, SECURITY
ONE SUPERVISOR - 40 PER CENT
TWO AGENTS -100 PER CENT
TWO AGENTS - 75 PER CENT
THREE AGENTS - 50 PER CENT

Be COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
i. DOMESTIC - NONE
2. FOREIGN-
ONE SUPERVISOR - 30 PER CENT
ONE AGENT - 100 PER CENT
TWO AGENTS- 25 PER CENT

END

MPM FBIHQ CLR

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 374

NW 88296 Dotld

232989628

'

’
!

Page

roe
t
a
'
mo

3S

ws
we
ey

Ps

4

}

ae

ti

_

—*

4

1

LX lib39S-Sb

foe

-a ryt
veep Ee
a ™
ron ° an
er.
<r 3
i orm, So
“Ome 1 od
. fart :
11'Go we
5 —_
. °
wa TS
” ts 4 OF Fy,
_
ea. th
tea be ao
1
Be
Jott
, , .
reel
Cs Sen
“45 an
. 1
' =
'
1


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION
NR 69 PG PLAIN

- MAR 2 § 1975
7235 PM NITEL-MARCH 25, 1975 RGM iMeror os
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI mee ES
FROM: PITTSBURGH (62-NEW)
ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION

_ SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. a
Whi doe
60%

THERE ARE 119 SPECIAL AGENTS ASSIGNED TO THE PITTSBURGH
OFFICE €75 HEADQUARTERS CITY AGENTS, 55 RESIDENTS AGENTS (RAS)).

ONE SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED COUNTERINTELLIGENCE

REBUNITEL MARCH 24,5. 1975.

(CI) FULL TIME.
ONE SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED INTERNAL SECURITY (iS) FULL TIME.

11 HEADQUARTERS AGENTS ASSIGNED CI FULL TIME AND 7 HEAD-
QUARTERS AGENTS ASSIGNED IS FULL TIME.

RESIDENT AGENT ASSIGNMENTS AS FOLLOWS:

6 RAS 2 PERCENT cI 5 RAS 2 PERCENT IS
3 RAS 3 PERCENT CI 2 RAS 3 PERCENT 15
-3 RAS 5 PERCENT CI 1 RA 4 PERCENT IS
2 RAS 6 PERCENT CI 2 RAS 5 PERCENT IS
3 RAS 7 PERCENT CI { RA 7 PERCENT IS
2 RAS 8 PERCENT CI 2 RAS tl PERCENT Is
1 RA 25 PERCENT CI 1 RA 12 PERCENT 1s

oe a
END PAGE ONE pnt, ee ,
aio on oe oe
; so aes Cat Se y ta

. NW 68296. Docld:32989628 Page 376

Cemp. Syst. ——

Legal Coun. -.
Telephone Km. —
Director See’

Ext. Affairs —
Files & Com. ——
Gen. Inv. -—..——
Ident.
Inspection
Sntel.

Laburatory .——~
Plan. & Eval. —
Spee. Inv.
Training —. -——

a

ae

ee


PAGE TWO, PG 62<NEW

1 RA 16 PERCENT Is
1 RA 24 PERCENT Is
t RA 28 PERCENT Is
THE ABOVE PERCENTAGE ESTIMATES WERE ARRIVED AT BY COMPARING
THE NUMBER OF CI AND IS CASES WITH THE TOTAL CASE LOAD OF EACH RAs
END
DBS FBIHQ CLR -

. i

NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 377

‘ : . an
; , a hy 2h! T2908 ‘a ;

{ol ar ot

1 :
wy ' ' ' pea
i moye i
‘ rt ' ' if ' ‘
, : ar Tr =3 AS? as Am oF to. , ' joy tt :
' st pty Joon et af 1 . . fog
' : . moe og
. SA Te moe ~e fod +
: . ‘ea ons 861.54 ea BF § ' ‘
. os : uO . ; ' . ' . i ; . . mo, , Para
so oe Te “C Pa eet Tet ee er 2 ee eee re rey mere,
soon, wh ERAGE YA th Gaudin POX EaTAUAT2E BOATVSOATT GVEA THT.
"oe oe tps 0 Om, me eae gens ons we . “ re Leds
SUSE TO ao PhaG JATOT CHT WTO egdao BE CIA 1O.5O neko UT,
1 " *, . . 1 fy +
. hoa Ft hy . 4 or . ' , "ap :
1 ! ! ' toe . —
Lo 1 : ne ; na J Ge
1 ‘ id a 5 '
. . ’ J 4 ve - .
ot Pe Fs ‘aise afta and’.
1 . « 7
. ot 5 ; at , . , = . i) a -
. : ’ , ' i. ‘gua |
rf , y bh ‘ + Coed me
' 2 ry! ye A aot ‘ ; “
> . " ” ” = oe .
1 ' . boy ‘ 1. no, ; 7 mh .
” . . wo. Se"
* Er es a ae : 4 , to : Oo ae ‘
; ‘ “4 ‘ See t ae ft te
‘ 3 : ‘ ’ an a ' ‘
. to my ‘ t : + ' ¢ ~— , ,
- ‘ ae £ art ; t
1 \ 1 . ' .
x ' ‘ rf . ‘
5 ; , ‘ ' ’ '
: : 4 1 a . t e ‘ ‘
‘ on . . Y + . v
«3 . . ’ 7 wt 1 v4 . if : , . on t :
‘ 5 uf r on ‘ . ,
. J , c ' J ; . . " ‘ mn
1 ' : , tos 1 ’ ' , 1
i : ' a my : ene ; . 4, .
fy ' soa , oF . ° . .
, ' ' ; a : \ |
* ‘ |
: Qa . wy |
1 ' ; . + _ ;
'
5 4
‘ 1
'
-
. t
' . : an . !
'
‘
N

| NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 378

Uae | ES45-SL


. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 46 Assoe Din
-_ DER soe. Din
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION —<—— Der ine
Sst. Dir, ;
48; Admin.
NR G07 PD ODE MAR-2 G1875 Corp, Syst.
{ J pt Affairg
8:57 PM NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 LLD TELEVYPE Eile @ Com =
TOs DIRECTOR { | :

FROM: PORTLAND |
ATTENTIONs BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION i fr ign

Legal Coun,

Telephone Rm.

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. D
arector See’y

PORTLAND HAS TWO SUPERVISORY DESKS HANDLING SECURITY bene
MATTERS. ONE DESK HANDLES ALL COUNTERINTELLIGENCE (CI) AND VERE
ACCOUNTING MATTERS. BOTH DESKS HANDLE INTERNAL SECURITY (1S)
AND SOME CRIMINAL MATTERS. BECAUSE OF OFFICE SIZE, PERSONNEL
OF BOTH DESKS NECESSARILY PARTICIAPTE IN BANK ROBBERY AND
OTHER MAJOR CRIMINAL MATTERS.
ALTHOUGH NOT SPECIFICALLY ASSIGNED SECURITY CLASSIFICATIONS,
SAC EXPENDS TIME IN DIRECTIONAL AND OVERSIGHT CAPACITY ON CI
AND IS MATTERS.
ESTIMATED SUPERVISORY TIME SPENT ON SECURITY MATTERS
EXPRESSED AS PERCENTAGE:
SAC (ONE), 5 PERCENT Cl, 5 PERCENT IS.
ASAC (ONE), NONE.
SUPERVISORS (TWO), 45 PERCENT CI, 85 PERCENT 1S,
AGENTS AND PERCENTAGE OF TIME ON SECURITY MATTERS:

NW 60296 Docid:32989628 Page 379


PAGE TwO

CI: 996

IS: 96

8B

5G
49

1g

PERCENT
PERCENT
PERCENT
PERCENT
PERCENT
PERCENT

“PERCENT

20-PERCENT

PERCENT

LOWER PERCENTAGES

TWO

TWO

TWO

FOUR

SIX

TWO

TWO

ONE

FOUR.

ATTEMPT TO ACCOUNT FOR TIME SPENT

BY RESIDENT AGENTS IN COVERING LEADS IN THESE FIELDS AND TO

DISCOUNT TIME SPENT ON OTHER MATTERS BY HEADQUARTERS AGENTS,

END.
TJT FBI WASH

NW 88296 Docid:327989628 Page 360

Dcc LR


NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 381

bA-lI1L39S-Sb

Ted

cae

yan oGr eT

os
ese

ed

NW 88296 Dochd:32989628 Page 302

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIG,
COMMUNICATIONS section
WAR 14 5 1975
cee te met
NRGOA RH PLAIN ee ae
3:50-PWNITEL MARCH 25, 1975 EJM Inston
Nou,

710 DIRECTOR ee Byala
an. le meee
ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SEC. Teaaine TZ
Legal Coun, WW.
FROM RICHMOND 1P Telephone Rm.

Director See’y
SENATE SELECT OOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES pe

REBUTEL TO ALL SACS MAR 24, 1975.

RICHMOND HAS ONE AGENT ASSIGNED APPROXIMATELY 39 PERCENT

OF HIS TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY AM NO AGENTS ASSIGNED TO
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS, ONE SUPERVISOR DEVOTES LESS

THAN 5 PER CENT OF HIS TIME TO SUCH CASES,

END -3 UE

®
“ Ft

DBS FBIHG CLR

b-

nye , ae

fie ts tea
‘fF * r * w

arene Tr

rom Ty pes ee et We 2 ioe + mpeg
. Toye s Hl .. T VTA

“a CAP TQS eterna
DIT RTT Merten nym, eg opera mie im pan

,
it *

a oa a
aan 1
aa

opt te pong ATER A Tame CEN went wa COMI T 7
: te ’ J ;

. egy

ate epee at

, . us tG ' “, ‘ . a= .

rere gee pA A TE AY VT po rece per aT ne STF rita)
oe? sO , f . rma ar , .

‘mney Reine eed wR me retipe oe a ee PTA STP PTT ET apa. ,

‘ , 1 ‘ . a . sm fol : ;

ORR BR te we oegen wee a tg -~

7 eS yyy cima em om ree meer AO ALT

oF PART er 9 p

co

°

won CRUGBGS-SL


“Assoc. Dir. ___—
wan FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION HE... Dep.-A.D-Adm._.
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION | DepoAD-Iny.——
Admin. ..
LE. BTS ee
NA hm” Files & Com, —
NRoo2 SC PYAIN TELETYPE 2) Gon Thy,
oe dont. smernenee
9:23 AM URGENT 3/27/75 VLS #INDELb Ta eon
3 pone ayo tis ee Trt.
Ti LEFOR- ray Laboratory ——
TO IRECTOR "4 nS me $5 PEL GF brs ory ——
Syce. Inv.
FROM / SACRAMENTO (66-511) pataj= Br fine

Telephone Rm.
Director 7) —— ft!

Legal Coun.
ATTNS BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION 2
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUREAU NITEL, MARCH 24, 1975.

IN HEAD QUARTERS, SACRAMENTO HAS ONE SUPERVISOR ASSIGEND NI
TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS. 7 AGENTS
ARE ASSIGNED FOL: TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS; 3 AGENTS ARE
ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS; 1 AGENT EXPENDS
75 PERCENT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS AND 25 PERCENT TO INTERNAL
SECURITY.

IN RESIDENT AGENCIES, 1 AGENT WITH 90 PERCENT ON INTERNAL
SECURITY AND 10 PERCENT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE; 1 AGENT WITH 50 PERCENT
INTERNAL SECURITY AND 50 PERCENT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE. 7 RAS HANDLE
VARIETY OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND ALSO HANDLE INTERNAL SECURITY AND
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS, THESE 7 AGENTS SPEND APPROXIMATELY 25
PERCENT OF THEIR TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
MATTERS (20 PERCENT INTERNAL SECURITY, 5 PERCENT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE).

END

FBIHQ CLR SMD <A, /\_.
Bios

tooe .
oe . .
ne ns . ro ¢
, ‘ . t
. :
- 9 web
: , ow .
~ ot , , :
+ oat oe
t fer 4 1
roo.
boot : i
a! , ,
t . rn .
Ly . . te
» "hoe
t :
.- : ‘ )
oe
oe
. 1 * 4
t . , i
. yh 4
& yee : 1 '
Pan
t at
a . ; :
‘ eit
wee fF x
7 7 Ok
wyt '
» aia two ’ my
: ‘ yoo
. : . a ae
- . vat ‘
ee - ws , '
arn t
r . s
» * , ‘
’ ' .
. ‘
co ' '
my mony .
mo) ue os
. ’ . oo. eh
2 o ;
" . ne ‘ . 1
me of tek
: " " Soy . =.
+e my te +
aan , '
; . '
’ ‘
Se . ‘ot
'
ge my :
‘ .
sore, .
“o . t
. ‘ ot
14
te 1 1 1 .
‘
1 ry
ro -
: oN i
‘
t
roy
. . +
: wget . an
1
tot 1
’ . * ” s
‘
atte .
tee w :
ee
' we .
. woah ow elt
'
tye
oF OF ’
+ ’ a
cy ae
t 1 .
1
_ wor ge . .
aos re or “
' A :
Y u
: ’ . t
. ' roa
. pee 2 i
‘ t 3 t . .
. ' moo fa
- ?¢ ‘ ‘4
oe vo 16 r '
a ' . . .
, ': '
. *
‘ vob
. 1 1
. ' :
cr
'
1 . . .
oe @ *
' t .
‘ , ' 1 ‘
" "he

NW.88296 Docid:32989628 Page 385
| - . L ,

hs

‘
eo
®
mo
iy
t
'
'
1

at 4 ty
to soe,
eee ee a . ’ ve
ep OE atts rt ¥ sg . '
WYSE Se is a
. . ot . ' , .
te at ,
' ' 7 1 a
‘ ao _— *S
: t . nr rs
' .
y a oat ' mo
. . . . Poet tae aoe
,' . os Vos
> . »
4 t . . .
. : roe * ate
. r* .
. rc og ' " oe
* boos ioe
. . (rio
. on . . ' awe to : * een)
5 ae i] 7 ; tee
baer, . . ‘
. : * . oy +
4 aot , Cat pot,
‘| sou a) ‘ , a ns
. *, + woo om .
. . , . . we
i ' ome mo, was
. . a io wo ll a .
, , . (tx;
‘ - . “ 7. Ae
. te “ ‘ toe Fire
re an La eta’
. . : tf ta.
a ro: mo, rn
‘ye woe t to : oh PT pect
y wT! : 4 ne 2)
t ' . 5 . .
. ne an . oO So
: , 7 <9 ct oe
? ry + . ar? ' wt Pel
~ - { oo —|
. , ; + . cto .
’ . ; a . a al a
mo “ ee yt :
% . ‘ .
‘ . . od : _
we LY pe LE toe,
14a woe oo fo ce .
“ ‘ te at . “ . .
4 . ref .
t , a ' .
rt . . a toe ‘ ned .
fa ' : ww . t ea!
. Seg . _ eee
: rn rn “Ome
: tt toy ‘ETI
. c
’ ere . ‘ . =~ &,
: . wy 1. ay . phi
roe to my te =.
* wf : eer

®

83

| 17 ae

33 7

a He

L

gS


Dir. —

a 2 44 Dep.-A.D-Adm.__. }!
a FEDERAL BUREAU CF INVESTIGATION ° Asst Ding

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION } Admin. :

me MAR 37 1978 Tet Affine 2

me ae LA Cs. apnea | Files & Com. —h

TE! bbe ie ; | Tnspo
Ubelge lt peep one a | ree ore 3

Ke Md a?
fii} abe Sen

Teleptons Rm _
SECTION . Director Sec’y =| .

moe’
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES, j.ccg:r yes GoaeAim

REBUNIT S MARCH 24, 1975 germ 3S pepee Pah, Lin Br
UNITEL TO ALL SACS MARCH 24, 1975. pare (cL 1-9/ SP
THE FOLLOWING IS A BREAKDOWN OF FIELD AGENT PERSONNEL

NROG1 SL PLAIN

Ss3HAM URGENT 3/27/75 TJO

TO DIRECTOR

ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACOOUNTI fe
FROM ST, LOUIS (94-297) RUC

ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECIR ITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS

IN THE ST, LOUIS NDIVISION AS REQUESTED BY RE COMMUNICATION.
NEITHER THE SAC OR THE ASAC ARE ASSIGNED TO

INTERNAL SECLR ITY OR COUNTERINTELL IGENCE MATTERS, ONLY ONE

SUPERVISOR IS ASSIGNED TO SUCH MATTERS, HE SPENDS APPROXIMATELY

395 PERCENT OF HIS TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND TWO PERCENT ON

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTER S,

SIX AGENTS SPEND APPROXIMATELY 75 PERCENT OF THEIR TIME
ON INTERNAL SECURIT Y AND ONE PERCENT ON OOUNTERINTELL IGENCE
MATTERS,

THE REMAINING AGENTS SPEND NO TIME ON OOUNTERINTELL IGENCE
MATTERS BUT SPEND THE LISTED PERCENTAGE OF TIME ON INTERNAL
SECURITY: THREE AGENTS, 5@ PERCENT; THREE AGENTS, 25 PERCENT;
ONE AGENT, 14 PERCENT; TWO AGENTS, 5 PERCENT, TWO AGENTS, 2
PER CENT.

NW 88296 Dochd:32989628 Page 386


PAGE TWO QL W297
ABOVE FIGURES REFLECT BOTH HEADQUARTERS CITY AND

RESIDENT AGENTS IN THIS DIVISION.
END

JDR ;
FBIHQ CLR

296 Dochd:37989620 Page 307


z

:

‘
‘

a

x
ar
’
: .
.

NW 88296 Docl

i. tary arty apn ge _ ue eee -
:
7 a Lath nee
. , .! |
. *
. »
: -
. 1 . :
»
: t
. on
; na 5
. . . , ,
| : ' . ,
. ‘ "
:
rt , ,
:
. + * ‘
ra ‘
1 . : |
vy
‘ ' .
. - : . ‘ |
. , t .
: ‘ ‘ ‘ _ |
oF 7 ‘
. . ,
"y ' :
. | |
- ” | |
. . a ait
. . , ‘ |
:
' "4
| | . . , ’ ,
Loa :
. t
2 | | |
; t
. | |
. ,
: .
:
© ‘ |
Q ° ‘ :
. ' ‘ : .
toy ' ;
. t . ‘ |
* . , ‘
. , . |
. . i 4 .
’
. . ‘ )
* : |
. :
.

GA-||CGBIS-Se

:32989628 Page 388

tyne

vay

t
'
we ®
'
'
:
on
'
‘
,
mF
o
,


‘Assoc, Dir. ne |

Bep. ~A.D Adm on

FEDERAL BUKLAU OF INVESTIGATION is O | Dep-AD tn
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION aa | Asst. Din

| Comp. Syst. —

MAR 2 6 1975 | ext attains — |

| Files & Com.
Gen, Inv.
Ident. |
# Inspection
Intell,
Laboratory —WW
Plan. & Eval.
§ Spec. Inv.
Training
Legal Coun.
i Telephone Rm. — j
Director See’y

“ ° Be > A ‘ Pete

, 4 é ,
od Caer

NROOS SU PLAIN receiver

8:46 AM NITPL MARCH 26, 1975 VLD

TO:  DYRECTOR, FBI
ATTN BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION)
FROM: SALT LAKE CITY

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELL IGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE BUREAU TELETYPE MARCH 24, 1975.

PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY (I9 AND COUNTER-
INTELLIGENCE cD “harters IN SALT LAKE CITY DIVISION AS FOLLOWS:

SAC: NONE,

ASAC: TWENTY PERCENT (10 PERCENT IS, 10 PERCENT cD.

SUPERVISORS: NONE.

SPECIAL AGENTS: ONE FULL TIME (70 PERCENT IS, 30 PERCENT Ci).
ONE FULL TIME (70 PERCENT CI, 30 PERCENT 19. ONE TWENTY PERCENT
(15 PERCENT 1S, 5 PERCENT CD. ONE TWENTY PERCENT (10 PERCENT IS,
10 PERCENT CI). ONE TWENTY PERCENT (10 PERCENT CI, 10 PERCENT 1S).

TWO TEN PERCENT EACH ON IS,
END. M

. NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 389


, :
U
.
_
'
en
.
:
a
:
i .
t
:

NW 88296

a Oe ca oer cE CY

SOOT UA Create tae py

Mla

a"

om

'
my ' ' ' :
eo . ce, _

1 ove 7 4 ye .
: to \ i ry ere) .
‘ z a
. , : .
- 74 ' eat he, . “ye
ra f - . . +
an eee pie athe le nota 4 .
7 . :
. ' ! :
. ° ¢ oh Ns ~ ad sof rr er es ve
” we H wn ESTO FLT, ‘ eo A af
. , 1, ,
'
'
2 ° . . .
4 . moos - > - ~ ~ .
of se rae ar hac ld, Tha.
, i a
es
pan gy ae ~ oe : 7 roe ras
Ps ce | a e {1 4. e 1} 2,27 rans . ne
Moe . yt tg ‘- oy ' "
a
'
a tage a ‘ re '
g - woh i? 1 oo " i ft - ek . Qn *
yo te Tg oY . ot ge . ay tems
@% i oa * & . es a = ty . 1) 4 ot ae ot Fa ‘ ‘
. .
. om
wow ve
* ~ .
‘ i « *
“ 1
. . '
1
. '
' . '
. , an ‘
. ; :
rot 1 .
! , i ,
, . a ¥

a :
1d:32989628 Page 390

(Q-6BIS-Sle

Oe
q

quai

v

aguas a
FINERE |

.

Gh W250

‘L

' ae
° .
. ae
~ lee .-
kee * ele
e * ,
eo. . woe
ecg . yep rt
2d To.
' ane a: car in? yo
> wee ke iy - 7
+ -- Pr . aye
tae «i I 8 op
mores » !
‘ wor. a ra + “
. . - , - eet
ar are oe ‘8
ae
3
'
‘
an '
‘ . ®
. v4
“1


FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

NROOS SU /PLAIN MAR 2.6 1975
B46 AM MITEL MARCH 26, 1975 VLD TELETYPE
DAREQT OBSDEBE aND ACCOUNTING SECTION)

FROM: SALT LAKE CITY
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE BUREAU TELETYPE MARCH 24, 1975.

PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY (1S) AND COUNTER-
INTELLIGENCE (CD MATTERS IN SALT LAKE CITY DIVISION AS FOLLOWS:

SACs NONE.

Budget, ped

ASACs TWENTY PERCENT (C10 PERCENT IS, 10 PERCENT CD.

SUPERVISORS: NONE.

SPECIAL AGENTS: ONE FULL TIME (70 PERCENT IS, 30 PERCENT CID.
ONE FULL TIME (70 PERCENT Ci, 30 PERCENT I9. ONE TWENTY PERCENT
C15 PERCENT 1S, 5 PERCENT CD. ONE TWENTY PERCENT (10 PERCENT IS,
10 PERCENT CI). ONE TWENTY PERCENT (10 PERCENT CI,

TWO TEN PERCENT EACH ON IS.
END.
JTG FBIHQ@ CLR

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 391

-

+

oe
a

10 PERCENT IS).

-

Dep,-A.D.-Adt aw j
Dep-A.D.-Inv¥. a
Asst. Dir.:
Adzain, .————= {ii
Comp. Syst. ———
Ext. Affairs
Files & Com. — |
Gen. Inv.
Ident. ..
Inspection
Intell. —...
Laboratory
Plau. & Eval, — fi.
Spee. Inv.
Training
Legal Coun.
Telepkone Rm. — i:
Director See’y —. 9

KGRE LEH

i LAP aay

in ' ’ : ‘ ie ee ee oy
’ . os , . :
; a BAe Ce re a oo
- ; ; . a * *
ahi ye we t a ” .

j oP ‘ ee of t. 4 owt _*
‘ . adi cy i este pte
: pate, ved
° « eS ous
. . : . aan
* ‘
7 7 Toe * tt A om = i ad ete mo « eo . * - |
cee eee ne : alba PP Os Sl Fo TL MPP art, . .
™ ; “
. : . , |
‘ |
., 4 Pare pre . rare .
: ’ a See One en pada Cee
a rn acd sue PT a
. , ‘ ' * .
' *
. ts , Pa Pep ome . Z ey . “ "
5 re a fill Beet OF Lh yt Ot agoeldy id
: ae 8 os .
. Ona er e
"ae . oe aor Fy — . . : - .
id afte Py 22 ee? 2 7 ot io ~ ae ee ao™ 4 :
od ~ . * - * ' ; :
, — . : . .
' p30 t : t ' nS an rn
, . = as va, ; ee Ber ks no
at rap Be . " , nts . ; i rae
" VT ge RAY fo re Ld x ‘ .
. el Tk Se
' ‘ anne] ‘is
: — OR.
Os obey te, ARTE
rete k ae bt te .
ate or, ne) Woy
: a
\ ' 7? BE.
: io
1 ' , + .
yo, a) , :
hog,
oe
. : ‘
oe a
iy , ,
ee
ato " pot aoe
t .
+ aor oot 17 -
‘
. ‘ + a .
. woo
. ae? aa ?
’ tom - ;
| Wot
. ‘ we r
‘
. pt Ae
. q
ro
:
. 4 '


Assoc. Dir, 2 |
Dep.-A.D.-Adm.__.. |

t is / Dep.-A.D.-Inv.__.

= Asst. Dir.:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION — Admin.

RAN nm Ge
boas SA CODE COMMUNICATIONS SECTION Bet atten Td
by bay File © Com woo

P i, Gen. Inv. WF

RATS os
62:55PM NITEL MARCH 25, 1975 ‘7 iy ‘
ent ns i

TO DIRECTOR TELE

a Inspe:tion
ce

py | fare.
FROM SAN ANTONIO aa pe

Lab at ry |
Plan. & Eval. ff

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION.

Spce. Inv. oH
Training
Legal Coun. |
Telephone Rm w
Director See’y __

REBUTEL , MARCH 24, 1975.
SAC ONLY SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL HANDLING SUPERVISION
OF INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS IN SAN
ANTONIO OFFICE. ASAC AND SUPERVISORS HAVE NO SUPERVISION OF
THESE MATTERS. SAC SPENDS APPROXIMATELY 29 PER CENT OF TIME ON
SUPERVISION OF INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS AND TEN PER CENT OF TIME
ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS. -
THREE AGENTS ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY NATTERS :
AND 4TH AGENT DEDICATES APPROXIMATELY 5@ PER CENT OF HIS TIME “To
THESE MATTERS « .
FIVE AGENTS ASSIGNED EXCLUSIVELY TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE s, THIS
BEING A MATTER BEING HANDLED AS A SPECIAL. " -

1

E N Deeesese

_ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 393


. oO "gas aa cond

qay Te] ga HOMAN AITUY CeeSec
AOTVA ATG ay
to OMOTUA WA2 are bas

STUTIVITOA TOWOELITTET VO FPTTINNOD TOLUTS LTA

io ; eTOLTOTS WUTAYHIIA C14 Teague

wo

TTA
ofTSE gh® HOAAM 4 HITUSTS
OTRTUATINS CVISCGAN FEV TORART YEOREVATIE YIN FAR

“AQ WP SAETTAY RQUBATLIAT IAaTIN TA YTIIWINA AANF ATT 40

EO PS OTSIVAITING Of IVAH BANSIVATIUS GIA DAQ4 CRITTIO OTT

4O TUT AC PUAN AAT 19 YETTAPIAGHSTA BO292 DAG .AALTION SSTHT

PVT FO TAD AAT VAT GIN WIBTTAT YTIAUONS LAIKA T WO NOI VAaIHe

a eQUETTAY WOU TOIIIETHISITIUOD 19
rer
te ITM VTTAUIT MUTATE OT PNET A08 CEnOTEaa 2594 BRANT
a
OO, OTSIMET Bre TO TIT Bad Oe YTTANIXONGIA BETAQIONG Tloa HTA CA
aS oé
,; Aran eQARTTA TRZHT
3o A
“INP

rast POU IA IST OU TSSI NSN OT YJEVIGUIINS GH19I28A aTida., CVI
otJAIVSI2 A OA UEIGHAN MILFS CMTTAN 4A MINI

- 4
saccoant * J

_ NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 394 lod~ | 34 B-Slo


Assce. Dir, f

5: 2 Deap-A.D-Adm.—. |

i FEDERAL uREAU OF ihvestinion <==" | Ant ies
NR 2D) CODED CoyucaTIONS secon Me
WesLlAM MARCH 26 1975 NITEL GDF AR 2.6 1975 ast, Athans ;
es | ee ce
TO: DIRE » FBI i; ene
{ Jedlowte a ee
FROM: SAN DIEGO (66-NEW) LETYPE 7 ar :

ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECT ION)

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTI vit tes, ior

REBUTEL TO ALL SAC‘S, MARCH 24, 1975,

‘f Lesal c The ae
fh} Teluchore Em.
' Dizee ‘tor Fifty —. |

THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTS SUPERVISORY AND AGENT TIME DEVOTED
TO INTERNAL SECURIT Y AND COUNTERINTELL IGENCE MATTERS IN THE SAN
DIEGO DIVISION:

SAC = SIX PERCENT OF TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND EXTREMIST
MATTERS $ TWO PERCENT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS,

ASAC ~- SIX PERCENT ON INTERNAL SECIRITY AND EXTREMIST MATTERS;
Two PER CENT ON “COUNTER INTELL IGENCE MATTERS.

ONE SUPERVISOR - 49 PERCENT OF TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERSs
49 PERCENT ON COUNTERINTELL IGENCE MATTERS,

ONE SUPERVISOR - 29 PERCENT OF TIME ON EXTREMIST MATTERS.

SEVEN AGENTS - EACH 19% PERCENT ON COUNTERINTELL IGENCE MATTERS,

TEN AGENTS - EACH 188 PERCENT OF TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY
MATT ERS.

FOUR AGENTS - EACH 168 PERCENT OF TIME ON EXTREMIST MATTERS,
EW

ant.

ater an
S43 ¥ io

THAT IS ALL : eal y ‘Ls
. \

SSSSSSSS ob

MPM FBIHQ@ CLR

NW 86296 Docid:327989628 Page 395

ee

gy Ba fag aT .

t Cn teed a
: ra :
4 iy? vite s
afin nr we 27 > . cis ey " tper Ww
wy * hay
eofe at Vga
vor Cente, Peon % ove
-. “ @ : :
a pes og cot
WVsis!
4 Se - PEM ON Qe pm eae Pane
(net ayo Ap Mera e ce Ce eae id eet ,
5 . s
nore es peme Tm pre cep at ote a ar a
° . : . |
|
mon at a ae) Loe toe Pr ee en
« ° e oo |
a mA ~ . me shat om bypass or oti oc ch oye ET EON Dg mae ;
sae ome . Ce Dee EE oR ea Oe eee CoE Ci er i . oe cg ws
7 ” . e .
eer yer ers
lls Mh ee ea oe iia OC ea | do an Ce ee ir hn ir es Mahe ied ZS ste
. er
ane Essa]
wee . m ; comee#
en aed dat ead ee i es CE Bs aaa aa YO 2, Nn _ : '.
a cn
mrn
“ig
Pe nl. loo ny er ae 2 Ft cn a oe or re! te
: “Gn
me
i elsadaplare rs mo.
* . sos sete : "
a iret ‘i
per] @ |
Pe tee doh Oe hat t tek eT ee a es so ore! © pasando
ete ed on a alls el tee a a a a ‘
° : . :
|r eee Et Lad ~ to, eee * ’ —~ ~* - en oe iamand at <a cain J Sup cm es * aa
. , +
ks ieee Cane Slo a OE ica ae aT a ene eS ie 2
e ‘ * " :
TP mR te peo meee mem my A me tay cere
: i - f
vy mer ooo ne
@
a woe M won. er a Co es ' Mayer ee reer

Ce ce i hs

. Oe er as

a) oe we) a

NW 68296 Docld:32989628 Page 396 2 | L394 S -56

FEDERAL GUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

NR 004 SF CODE_.-
12 Ph URGENT 3/26/75 MCC

e MAR 2 6 Bro
TO DIRECTOR ca
TELETYPE

FROM SAN FRANCISCO

ATTN BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECT ION

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES
RE BUNITEL, MARCH 24, 1975.

THE FOLLOWING BREAKDOWN EXCLUDES ON A PERCENTAGE BASIS
MAN DAYS SPENT- ON CRIMINAL MATTERS BY AGENTS ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL

SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE CASES

SAN FRANCISCO HAS 70 AGENTS AND 5 SUPERVISORS ASSIGNED

Assoc, in. ee
Dep.-A.D.- Admin §

Dep.-A.U-Lnv.
Asst. Dir.:

Inspection _____. 8 |
Intel. ;
Laberat ry ——
Plan. & Eval, off
Spee. Inv. i
Treinicg

Legal Coun. —~asue
Telephone Rm. ww
Director See’y

FULL TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY. IT HAS 73 AGENTS AND 3 SUPERVISORS

i Se
FULL TIME AND ONE ADDITIONAL SUPERVISOR 25 PER CENT TIME ASSIGNED
TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE. ONE SAC AND ONE ASAC 25 PER CENT EACH

ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE.
ccs

vs

END
ITEWIZ
JTG FBIHQ

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 397



Dep-A D-Adr

FEDERAL BUREAU OF Investig Dep. A Dal
COMMUNICATIONS section. “Adin
Comp Aye 2
; MAR § a5 195 Bist APE ra —_
= Gen. Inv.
TELET YPE Ide.

Inspertion _
Inte. 2 ee
Labsratury
Plan. & Eval —
Spee. Inv. - —.—
Training .-
Leyal Coun. ..
Telephone Rm.
Director See’y

NROGS SJ CODE
18206 PHATTEL 3-25-75 axe
a
TO DIRECTOR
ATTENTION: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION
FROM SAN JUAN -
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

REFERENCE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ALL SPECIAL AGENTS IN CHARGE
DATED “MARCH 24, 1975, CAPTIONED AS ABOVE.

THE FOLLOWING IS A BREAKDOWN OF SUPERVISOR AND AGENT
PERSONNEL IN THE SAN JUAN DIVISION ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY
MATTERS?

ONE SUPERVISOR ~ FULL TIMEs ONE SUPERVISOR - TWENTY PER
CENT OF THE TIME$ FOURTEEN SPECIAL AGENTS = FULL TIME; THREE
SPECIAL AGENTS = FIFTY PER CENT OF THE TIME.

AT THIS TIME, THE SAN JUAN DIVISION HAS NO COUNTERINTELLI-
GENCE MATTERS IN A PENDING STATUSs THEREFORE, NO AGENT PERSONNEL
ARE ASSIGNED TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE. :

#
es
eee.

>

END. os Pc
Mees
DBS FBIH@ ACK FOR ONE GA yO aa
\o

a
an ae uae

Rem A e 0
x Re 7
en,
ye 2
Bh a
BD

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 3990 —


abe ' A ‘ ; 1
‘NW 88296 Docjd:32989628 Page 400. la2-

woulTaze “eiltau
Balt lyLTIA AVIA LCT!

Lone “ . tg HAGE De we ane, 7 lm
Gai Qewk BTHELA JISC 12 4A at

SOY. Jab JAG SRGRS,

3Q09 Le Suche

Mb “OP atsed ASTIN M1 34a:

JOI4 QUA TS9GU FS suee Testy $s
—we *

te a a aed , panes A

Vik Ue LOSR
ew. TT

eu aera wy 7,

"6 RetTikees TOF Ihe HF AL GA
co

eTUC AW BA GRISTTIAD eve! goto VE STAC

Cie

THRDA Gua HOTENEST IS FO mNeINASSS a aL oro cut

ort te UES Jf. iM THE OT Ga’ orn

velvnasue fu gablT

Shalt g..2T Lut ama JAEORA2

won

aut qT ci Fong

'

eR CEEE OLLIE ae) ae OL: vl, sath

wet te, . pot,
Sut ¥ nag vies hs F358
:

A eanorana 7
oe ears

OLEIWTG

QUTAT Ta

“ali "AR SHT UI JER TE

AUR e MOBIVETING 20

VSITHUOY geat SAT ae Biss

SIU YTATG © Livr4s, 16d 45
MAS EHT 9 Bh1T DET TA
ab Sea AwT eyeTTat. cone"

TUIPEns yay OF :

, z i oe
. 1 ' ;
' .
. wm Caer:
> , : way : . i
” i bred
bot A Sher 407 Oa sHISS ase
an : . :
¥ Fy ‘ '
a 1 “
. : i .
'
‘ . ro, 1
my i
te .
', J t we a "1 } t
: ‘ . b ' . _

NUBIS-SL


Assoc, Dir,
Dep~A.D-Adr__
Dep-A.D-Iny___
Asst, Din:
Admin. _

Comp. Syca
Ext. Affairs __
Files & Com.

\3

FL k wt LA GE TVEST AG: tia

COMMUTNGATIONS SECTION

NROO2 SV CODE

715 PM NITEL_ 3/25/75 PNR wr jos fee |
TO ECTOR Labwohiy Lo
ths Plan. & Eva

FROM SAVANNAH Spee, Inv.
Training

Lesal Coun. ___

Telephone Rm. _
Director Sec’y _

ATIN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECT ION

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.
REBUNITEL ALL SACS MARCH 24, 1975.
IN RESPONSE TO RENITEL, THE FOLLOWING BREAKDOWN IN PERSONNEL
ASSIGNED INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS IS BEING
SET FORTH:

INTERNAL SECURITY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
1 Sac 0 0
1 ASAC -_ OF 0
1 SUPERVISOR 40 PERCENT 10 PERCENT
1 AGENT 90" 0
1 AGENT 50" 10 PERCENT
1 AGENT io 0
1 AGENT 0 30 PERCENT

ALL OTHER AGENTS’ ACCUMULATIVE TOTAL OF TIME WOULD EQUAL ‘10 PER
te genesis heiesenentastintinttn natn
CENT FOR INTERNAL SECURITY AND O FOR COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FOR ONE
AGENT.

END


ee ed A yy os Pa on . eo r nowt oy a. 4 “oe pe
‘ ~ eT PIVADO TD Tah badd Bee dee Todd 2 ae
if ,
eQVOP ght blk DOA Ay aed Dae.
wa EOD i te Re a gd iV bs dd Oy gb goene! OT
.
SU ab Oat eee ESET ESOO Clet Yat oon Fegude To. ei Lust
. , ae .
— * Tr
m - srnvd J
, mm ool
Th pry
me . . a+ ' ae ue a ~ ag no rs
PLT a de VELOSO ada
ees ’
. rit ho
dain: a oy i
So -o
= gion 4
: , won ~- sy
a _ og.
con)
ated Dorm ; weg le. pk cape oy
u : " _ T.43 ]
‘ .
Fo wCuad OI " L- ; rare he ©
. as o a l rs: {
oi . o 7 . - 7
Pog ew os ce , snot gs
. aoe sees ome a oo >” - toma geet . es a rye
mh ae i 2 a Mew te ho a PAT ATs AVS ms, ‘, T., ba oo wif ll
+ ' . . ~ ‘ . Jot + . ; : _ a . ' to
-_ 27 TET Vb eT Gl Gb Gove a fb et oe ep YD oa You
4 » ay Tro .
: . , . bo
se
a . : : ‘ ’ , ‘ * ,
et . ‘ae Bik
* . ‘ +
. ' . “ cad ‘y . . ' ' 4 .
s cr ’ ' , °
: e on we
, 7 ; ; . . , . _ vous
* . . “ay + ara
“ vt ‘ nos ' Pee :

NW 88286" Docid:32989628 Page 402 - (po

QMIb3e-Ele


‘Assoc, Due ——"—

whe wiseéed, GUMEAL 0 ‘ S Dep.-A.D- Adnan

fb tal iui IF IRVESTIGATT ——— Dep-A. Dnt ———
CUNIMUNICATIONS SECTION Asst. Dit.

an 7 Adain. -———r"™

; rye . ‘amy. Syst ——

WAR ATG Gee Agar —

) } v. o) ' eo a & Com —

WR@62 SE CODED / on. a hn
(Umm ate ad 19 i Tot ereeneeerearee A
: 1 Jn thal ——
32:59 PM NITEL /MARCH 25, 1975 cS VA by yh ee
ar ah Ua ratory an

TO DIREGIOR YH [yud Poletti

| Fin & Eval. —

1 Ne AH . Spee Inve ———
i ( on ; E a gringo |
f (ord MN Leral Coun. anes

Re.
LECT COMMLTTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. Toler eoy
RE BUREAU NITEL, MARCH 24, 1975.

FROM SEATTLE
SENATE

SEATTLE DIVISION HAS THE FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENTS TO INTERNAL
SECURITY MATTERS:

ONE SUPERVISOR- FULLTIME; FIVE AGENTS - FULLTIME; THREE
AGENTS - S5PERCENT OF THEIR TIME.

SEATTLE bEvision HAS THE FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENTS TO COUNTER-
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS :

ONE SUPERVISOR: 8@ PER CENT OF TIME$s SEVEN AGENTS ~ FULLTIME,

END

HOLD FOR ONE MORE

NW 65296 Docld:32989620 Page 403


. .> = ; . : areye) a ud ees, wel phe wwe dvi baa
a : . , an ‘ : - ; a to
i ' . ‘ . . ‘ . . taed ves bo qh
' , : a a . Do yes
> ‘ an “o£ ' ' . % .
, . ° ° ' nn ' ‘ boa wd bd ches fete o
‘ 3 . (3 , : .
doe , ns . oe oe 7 : . . -
tee: . ‘ eae bk db ee dae b be te Sed ale 2 Br a wt
cea te vt . i . " we , | won. ’ f an . , ;
; ny ; ' 7 . , ” . . . « ty ‘ . w ’ ’ ,
r : ‘ , soa , obj al Qru KoGPuall gow de tle ase,
oe woe ’ a eee ee i wa phim ce bdbs dee c¥ s ee 4 wht d wok tvs ds 3 ~~ cul Law - "ay "
ws ‘ : ! . ot oe . ' , eo
. » 1 . : ot
. ., ro. , ' a ms Ly (8bAgdbids be belive
, ' ’ ‘ ' a] 7
’ A , 3 ‘, . ‘ ; 7 . , . ., ' = ,
so * Sete BS PE SN me ak Bo Ad 2) UE at uss ou
‘ ' . : ' r ~ .
an ; me ee!
‘ . . ’ “ . . @eteak oo heb ok arti in ts. om fda dann.
” . . ; . eo ‘ am mY
? * “a . Boat n *. . 4 .
, oe ' tw bee Sb Sade ck ee GU td Gaal Preor oisu HCD e Rew,
a eoouts : ’ . moot ks a 3 ' =o /% : n
ot ' * ’ . ‘a: mar
. . : os . > Waisted ose SEs edad bk
’ . ot ' . ‘ . , on .
. : woke oa moe , Peet ‘
‘ ee bee 8M Oe i eve we Bleeds HU thow Rot oe fares he ne wih
, . r . ‘ ” - . . .
’ - ‘ . wok . ; ‘ faves
. :
1
: 1 7 se aheee Parr a ee
1 . .
: :
. 4
:
+ t
'
. t
‘ * : ‘ . .
. : : . .
' , , . , .
: ' a : , 4 ‘ . -f .
. . 1 7 U a f on ' 1 ‘
, .t ' ' 2 . t 1 oe
. r , , “eo oF , set : . .
‘ roo 4
7 t . . ' »
/ — 1
NW 88296 Docld:32989628, Page 404 :


La

a ae FEDERAL BUNEAU OF INVESTIGATION 7

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION a “2,
Coop. Sy
NR O13 SI CODE MAR 2.6 1975 Fi tains —
10:22PM NITEL 3-26-75 DdK = Qe Oke
TELETYPE Lo oe
TO DIRECTOR re a _ oS
“9 ha hogs ae
CATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION) ik ‘ ed ae oe
NG Loken ben
FROM SPRINGFIELD (66 ) .\ foo

Telephones Em, _.
Director See’y

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.
RE BUREAU NITEL TO ALL SAC’ 5S MARCH 24, 1975.
AN ESTIMATE OF THE TIME SPENT BY AGENTS OF THE SPRINGFIELD
DIVISION ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS
IS AS FOLLOWS:
THIRTY- SIX AGENTS SPEND APPROXIMATELY 17 PERCENT OF THEIR
TIME ON INTERNAL SECURITY MATTERS. ONE OF THE ABOVE SAS SPENDS
APPROXIMATELY 25 PERCENT OF HIS TIME ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS,
AND ONE OTHER SA SPENDS APPROXIMATELY 17 PERCENT OF HIS TIME ON
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS, ONE SUPERVISOR SPENDS APPROXIMATELY
' @5 PERCENT ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND APPROXIMATELY 5 PERCENT ON
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE WHILE ANOTHER SUPERVISOR SPENDS APPROXIMATELY

15 PERCENT OF HIS TIME ON INTERNAL SURITY MATTERS,

c 88296 Dochd:32989628 Page 405 :
a _ en me ev nr On ee en ee


SI 66-

PAGE TWO
THE SPRINGFIELD DIVISION DOES NOT HAVE ANY SQUADS OF

AGENTS ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO THESE MATTERS AND THE ABOVE
ESTIMATE HAS BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE UTILIZATION OF TIMES
SPENT DURING A TWO-WEEK PERIOD ON MATTERS BY AGENTS OF THE
SPRINGFIELD DIVISION,

END

DBS FBIHQ@ CLR

W 88296 Docld:32589628 Page 406 —. en


Tae, a
* oREGEWED ©.
__. TELETYPE UNIT -

a * : .. , . 7
2 ~ _ . ' . a : ; |
2 - . . tf
: oe ; Cy.
De
. _ Lote . : CE
L - . a ; ; SS =
_ - m - 7 7 «o
oe . /- §
re ~ : o
. St 8
.. 2 _ 5 - . { =
Pee eS = =

ACOCRAL CUREAY GF investagtiany Den AD Adin

COMMUNI PATI laNs SEoT 1p Dep-A.D.-Inv.—
Asst, } iy ;

i AAR 2 26 1975 Aint

Comp Aas. ae |
. BITS eee Fr
NR@19 TP CODE Te ‘cr Bf mia =| ,

Gen. Inv.
6-10PM NITEL MARCH 26, 1975 JFD pe Tent, ae
aA Ingpertion
+. . Intl. i
TO DIRECTOR ref ae —i
is Plan. & Eval —
FROM TAMPA (195-0) Spec Inv. =
Tried Y --— sme F
: Lowal Bi... ne
ATTN: BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING SECTION Telephone Rene
Dire See’ fh

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

RE BUNITEL MARCH BA, 19755 REQUESTING THAT EACH SAC SUTEL

THE NUMBER OF AGENTS ASSIGNED TO INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTER-
INTELLIGENCE MATTERS.

TAMPA HAS ONE SQUAD WHICH HANDLES INTERNAL SECURITY AND
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS AS WELL AS OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS,
SUCH AS APPLICANT, SELECTIVE SERVICE, DESERTERS, AND EXTREMISTS.

NONE OF THE AGENTS ARE ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO INTERNAL
SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
1 AGENT WHO IS ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS,

THE PERCENTAGE OF AGENT TIME SPENT ON INTERNAL SECURITY AND
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS IS AN ACCUMULATION OF THE TIME SPENT
BY EACH AGENT WORKING SUCH MATTERS.

INTERNAL SECURITY - SUPERVISOR, 2@ PERCENT; AGENTS, 3.5
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE - SUPERVISOR, 15 PERCENT ae 1.5.

108 septic
oat ge apes

-¥, ES eve
: 5) * j x2

END


Assoc, Dir,
Doep.-A.D.-Adm,
Deop-A.D.-InV. eee

Awe. Gin: !

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
‘ COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

MAR 2.6 1975
NROO4 WF copED v=
2:57PM URGENT 3-26-75 KLS TELETYPE

i

TOs Hl DIRECTOR, FBI

FROM: i = SACy WFO LX buke Le f

.* h & Cf

‘Vvelephone Bm. 2.
Jijirector Sec’y 0 7

ATTENTION BUDGET aND-ACCOUNTING SECTION
_* 47
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

- 7
-_- ~~

‘” iw
—_—

REGARD ING BUREAU NITEL DATED MARCH 24, 1975.

WASHINGTON FIELD OFFICE CWFO) HAS ONE ASAC DEVOTING
12 PERCENT OF TIME TO INTERNAL SECURITY CIS) AND 78 PERCENT
TO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE (CD MATTERS, THE REMAINING 10
PERCENT BEING ADMINISTRAT IVE, POLICE AND LIAISON DUTIES.

IN ADDITION, WFO HAS 1@ SPECIAL AGENTS AND 6
SUPERVISORS ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO CI, AND 21 SPECIAL
AGENTS AND {| SUPERVISOR ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO IS MATTERS. -
ONE ADDITIONAL SUPERVISOR DEVOTES 75 PERCENT OF HIS TIME
TO CI MATTERS AND 25 PERCENT TO IS MATTERS.

END.

JRM FBIHQ

<

CLR gore
acne ‘

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 409


1 !
‘ .
’

.
~
‘ *
'
on .
oo
> t
a4 ,
.
*
a
:
, .
. !
a

a oe airy Pe uate ” pe ten woe
“oe a ae nae ve ik er -
_ a yy ots alte i, t SHY atta! heres
a 2 sy '
. : ‘ 7 * _ ) '
. .* 4 ‘
_ . . SfCe ey pape .
. . wl ei RET po fe
7 . ' ' .
: . pore . :
. . . ' roe
t
. ‘ , -
- mi
eo FG 7a
, . wee - we FTP.
; OOP g es a tanuors cage
. . . om
. ‘ . ae 7 - ” a
| wEOMER. OU Gaede ESR
1 Roe . "| * oe
. . ’ ; : | ‘. F foes 7 8
7 0 . eo. ¢ I en PD ne 1 “a we : ar
ey + se le e oN . we . ’
aoe aes) a eR eg
. . + cn ° . , 1
‘ can sete gt . ,! : . a
: dhe an we cr ee nes
, fa aan ott COSY et. . =“ wad .
at *s a a . ' . . .
; PoeeP gs ee SP gue ely. Gd Ve,
a SP ee Se ee
. . ' . ¢ a
. wet . - : eon ~ ot
. . ” tae — , wy
: bh ay ed soG lear ort ve .
to tty ‘
ae , * ' : , ’
val " ! 7 . . a i tae -
went Ooa dn, aoe mt wa
* 1 . .
ee I a A cet et
i :
, - owe ep ad puss : o eee
a . * . e ° + ‘ a -
to * . oe mot
2 t4 fee a
'

“4
.
soe
ra
*
i
ww

pes


ENVELOPE

. ROUTE Tg

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
MAY, 29626011)

GSIEGEN! REG: io. a7
Assoc. Dirap ee

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT oO’ so
Memorandum 8" ae. a. BA Sate
, 1 - Mr. ° . dams Asst. Dir.:
€ 1- Mr. J. A. Mintz sami
Ext. Affairs
: D. TE: iles om, ——
TO : Mr. J Down Adams 6B ECRE 4/4/75 File ae
324 be Saw |[SsAe/M-y _ wr. w. R. Wannall ri
From : W. R, Wannall gl (fi 2| 2011 1 - Mr. W. O. regen alles
. wn 6 172 -ol Plan, & Evol. —
. ,) rl | a ” ts Sess Inve ——
} SUBJECT: ‘SENATE SELECT. COMMITTEE F die cb “By SP. 2a aE Fea —

ir ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES; CLASSIF Legal Coin,
RCORRICKHEIELS, |, ASSOCTATE~ DE “OLAS iEY ON: 2 Director Sec'y
COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT
sf i tar
‘ < nnd Ie df
Memorandum captioned as above, “3/27/75, from Legal
Counsel to you, noted that you and Wannall were to meet with
Mr. Hills and Mr. Phillip Buchen, Counsel to the President,
on 3/28/75, Your addendum to the memorandum pointed out the
results of this meeting and the various matters discussed.

As a follow-up to this meeting, you, Legal Counsel
Mintz and Wannalil met on 4/4/75 with Mr, James Wilderotter,
who is presently working under Mr. Buchen in coordinating
intelligence community matters relating to the inquiries
underway by the Senate Select Committee. Mr. Wilderotter was ($)
given a briefing similar to that which had been afforded to en

ea.

3 Buchen and Hills. In addition, the discussion covered matters f
Fa be of a sensitive nature relating to the ORCHID) and similar progra
Ee : electronic surveillances, specialized handIing of informants,
eel bs. and Bureau Source 4 (access to social security records}. Many of
Bee these matters discussed covered topics with which Mr. Wilderotter
Ban had become familiar when he was assigned to the Department as an
eed Assistant to former Deputy Attorney General Silberman.
ed es
at ' Wilderotter said it was the feeling at The White House
Ee i that while raw FBI files should not be made available to the
HS i Committee, it might be necessary to permit the Committee to review
yy gb a few such files in order that the integrity of the FBI could be
A St established with the C ittee. It was pointed out to him that

we did not agree to t menet we could furnish summaries of
material from the filesy Lispiaerortes ea) he did Hot Pate cick

RED-L c- “Lb ease

mm ashy). CONTINUED — OVER

5) de nents :
9 SECRET we 6 APR 11 19

ocean, ecm, Stee

Classified 2 wa i) _
Exempt from GDS ies 2 and 3 ao
Date of D Ssification In inite S
t
Lf
3

2465 ROUTE IN ENVELOPE

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 411


NW 85296 Docid:32989628 Page 412

Ne SECRET

Memorandum to Mr. J. B. Adams

RE: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES;

@3ii t ELSASSOCIATE

COUNSEL ‘TO THE PRESIDENT

furnishing reports and letterhead memoranda which had been
prepared for dissemination would satisfy the Committee's
needs. He was advised by both you and Mr. Mintz that it was
our feeling that we should not furnish the raw material but
summaries could be prepared for the Committee's purposes and
if necessary, Bureau officials could be placed under oath
and attest to the correctness of the summaries. Wilderotter
said that this was a matter which he would afford further
consideration.

As during the conference with Buchen and Hills,
it was obvious as the result of our meeting with Wilderotter
that The White House was most anxious that it not be caught
by surprise by revelations of activities which in any way
might be considered questionable. The White House is making
every effort possible to become cognizant of any such situation
prior to the Committee hearings.

Classified “Xp Secret” to protect highly sensitive
investigative techniques and matters relating to foreign
relations.

ACTION:

For information. Further contacts with Wilderotter
or other White House Staff Members will be duly reported.

Ve nf
Ail ‘Cos .

aA an

ee

ap SECRET
-~2-


OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10
MAY 1952 EDITION

; 4
y . $010-106 y a4
GSA GEN. REG, NO, 27 . 4 Asse. Dir.
)RNMENT %. Dop. AD Adm.
?

UNITED STATES GO"

\: / Dep. AD Inv. —

sst. Dir:
Ni M emorandurn wa

Comp. Syst. _—

Ext. Affairs ——

TO : Mr. W. R. Wannalj!i""* " pare: 4/4/75 Files & Com. —
isrevin

FROM W, dy eee Laborato —

“ over 3 (Lom ememete Legal Coun. — _

ra Plan. & Eval.

SUBJECT. _ SENSTUDY 6 5) See. nw

Telophone Rm. —
Director Sec’y __

This will confirm that on 4/4/75 Mr. James Wilderotter
of the White House orally approved the Bureau's dissemination to the
Senate Select Committee the following two memoranda: confidential
memorandum of J, Edgar Hoover dated 8/24/36, confidential memorandum
from John Edgar Hoover dated 8/25/36, both dealing with conversations
Mr. Hoover had with the President.
ACTION:

For record purposes.

WOC:aso (8)

l- Mr, Cregar mo,
1l- Mr. A, L. Lacey ee

A be a LE 37S SF

g\e So
pease | 2
si oo pat or 1 nPR 8 1975 |
aes ¥ p comme ary cane *t: settee
0

iW

NW 60296 Dochd:32999628 Page 413

‘og
t.
;
2 = Logawcounsel Division

(i-Mr, Farrington)
1 - Mr. We. R. Wannall
1 Mr, W., 0, Cregar

The Attorney General April 8, 1975
Director, FBI

UNITED srarns SENATE SELECT COMMITTER
ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

é .
[: *} f ote
Reference is made to a letter from the Senate
Select Committee dated March 19, 1975,’ requesting certain
documents and other information from the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the
Committee is. the original of a memorandum which constitutes
@ reSponse to a request set forth in referenced letter,

A copy of this memorandum is enclosed for your records.
Processing of the additional requests is continuing on an
expeditious basis and further responses will be forthcoming.

Enclosures = 2 co
mole.
| On ans rH Ca
| EVE rivl f aoe sags 12
i seers .

.
ts
mat

; HEC. 3x
vs ay L625 69

<f B APR
Oop AD sar . X-118 10 1975
Dep. AD Inv. ._ - —

\

Asst. Dist Ne
in, eT | oh ae
Admin. ‘ ns eg . ee
Comp, Syst. —_ 7 e MAILED 7 $ yr ms ¢
Files & Com APRQ 1975 \.. uf
Gen. Inv. peas ‘, coe
Ident. Pe m 4 Bo tate.

Inspection
Intell.

Laboratory

Plon. & Eval. —

Spec. Inv,

| ReapR 1615

ae) phone

Director Secty_. + MAIL ROOM[__] TELETYPE UNIT(__] GPO 984.545
| NW.88296 Docid:32989628 Page 414


a 2 - Legal Countel Division
(i-Mr « Farrington)
l= Mr, W. R. Wannall
i Mr, W, 0, Cregar

April 8, LOvS

UNITOD STATES SINATE SELECT CoMItTTED
30 STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS iz
RESPECT TO YWTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Reference is made ta letter dated March 19, 1975,
to the Attorney General from the Chairman of captioned
Comittee, which enelosed certain requests for documents
and other information from the federal Bureau of Investiga~
tion (FRY.

One of the vequeste contained in referenced letter
was for a list of names and tities of all Intelligence
Division personnel at FRI Headquarters down to and including
unit chiefs, together vith a number af personnel bolay tho
Level of unit chief categorized by unit, At a meeting on
ipvilL 1, 1975, Inspector John B, Hotisc and Spocial Agent
Paul ¥, Daly discussed this request with Ur, William Miller,
Statz Birector of the Senute Select Committec, Fi was
agreed that the vaguest as stated would be modified and that
the FBI would prepere a List of personnel in the Intelligence
Division dewn to the Level of unit chief, with names included,
which would be made available for roview hy appropriately
cloarod porsonnel of the committee staff at FBI Ueadquarters,

This is te advise that the list has been prepared
/ and is available for raview under the above éonditions,

1 ~ The Attorney General

\! ae pele ae
q ; ae FUTORMENTON CONTAL fh
EWL?jVi Fa a us Po TFLLD, ; ,

Assoc. Dir. (7) ° , ‘7 teen sghl

Dep. AD Adm. _

Der, AD Inv. it
Asst. Dir: i

Admin,

Comp. Syst. —_
Ext. Affairs __ ‘ ) ¢
Files & Com. 7 al Nee .
Gen. Inv. ty ‘ ay
Ident. Nese os
Inspection Ay nw 4 fen ¢ \
Intell. ee “A hae ie
Laboratory ’ mt ie ‘
Plon. & Eval, * oo EN Ho qe eo 1
Spec. Inv. cA it . ue . ‘3 \ \
Training ye 4 . 7

Legal Coun, wn Lo

‘ Telephone Rm. (- o- / on td -
Director See'y... MAIL ROOM{__} TELETYPE UNIT (_] GPO 954-345

NW! 88296 Docid: 32989628 Page 415


ALL TNFCRNATION CONTAINED me
HEREIN IS UNGLASSIFIED
DATE / / BY

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 416

ae -

POLE SEES POR SE MS TECISS Cid ck Bee

cae ee

ee

ree RS NTI EY

Sr MER
toe

foe meres eae
sabe UR ERTRTONT re ceree cerns yet teen 1% F ereemngee— FF

7

Se ear en To Se Pa

Ri Ss ea re mi ce et smmaanaiaiaaes ee Se aaa Sea tcintanaontrenineememesneetsinendiatt Me

‘ an
: 7 i. .
A . !
.
: :
‘
= '
: ‘
Sy
7 ~ 1 7
2
,
; 7
y 4 :
¥ &
4
z ;
~
. :
i
A
i

a mele

| abn sa ent TebaPe. a

Dh eee “sa fe fp Pekd-2 Sea anit ©

cael

\in-e829¢-Doce: 32989828" Page at

Dante

2 S oa

wat et

“7 _ Mi > we é, UD

to

Fein


iver’ ieee

ah ge sae

“a sag
_ Gs 7.

a

mo ie

‘pgel
FONG Heal Samal

- BE ALARSERY, ON. BIAS es

Yhomas W. Leavitt
Inspector ~ Deputy Assistant Director
“Counterintelligence Branch

4:00 p.m. to midnight Supervisor
¥F, Anthony Tansey

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE BRANCH

Section CI-1

William A, Branigan

Eugene C, Peterson

Special Cases Unit
James P, Lee
Five Special Agents

New York Unit
Alfred E. Smith
_Five Special Agents
Washington Unit Chief
4. Wilfred R. Schlarman
*“ Four Special Agents

One Special Agent on special assignment at National War College.

- : Section CI-2

- \
William O. Cregar

James W. Redfield

This document ig prepared in response
your reguest and is not for dissemination
Glitside your Committee,

go official proceedings by your Committee and
‘thé .coitent may not be disclosed to unauthorized
/personnel without ‘the express approval of the FBI.

ae
Fyony, *

NW 88296 Docld: 32989628 Page 418

eal,
va ion tr

INTELLIGENCE DIVISION

W. Raymond Wannall
| : Assistant Director

Kyte

ek
Oa kaa
ye Cadel

Hunter E, Helgeson
Inspector - Deputy Assistant Director
Internal Security Branch

Midnight to 8:00 a.m, Supervisor
Harry E. Morris, Jr.

Section Chief

Number 1 Man

Unit Chief *<

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Section Chief

Number 1 Man

Its use is limited


rived Yt
Herbert J. Morgan
Five Special Agents

Satellite Unit
Howard H, Wallace
Three Special Agents

Coordination Unit
John P. Thomas
Two Special Agents

a

Forrest 5. Putman, dr,

Sebastian §. Mignosa

Bombing~Antiriot Laws Unit
-  mecHard J.

Four Special Agents:

Ss
‘(Middle EastYunit
Carl F. Freeman
Three Special Agents

iy
[Ear East] Unit
William W. Hamilton
Two Special Agents

| [Euvan Unit
~", “Charles H, McCarthy
“ Two Special Agents

“

Nationality Unit
Vinicio Henry Nasca
Two Special Agents

\
‘Home A, Boynton, Jr.
H, C, Flemister, Jr.

Liaison Supervisors
Six ;

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 419

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Section CI-~3

Section Chief

Number 1 Man

“AT. 24 OU 8 LR
s Wade Ade mee

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Section CI-4

Section Chief

Number 1] Man


Foreign Liaison Unit
Robert A, Bermingham Unit Chief
Two Special Agents

4

INTERNAL SECURITY BRANCH
IS~l Section

Joseph G. Deegan Section Chief
William H, Atkinson Number 1 Man

Black Natronalist-.and White
Hate - Central: Unit ;
William D. Neumann Unit Chief
Two Special Agents

Black Nationalist and White .
“Hate = bast unit ate
Paul E. Nugent , ; Unit Chief
Two Special Agents

Black Nationalist and White
Hate ~ West Unit
Garnett T. Tunstall Unit Chief
Three Special Agents

Black Nationalist ~ South,
Klan and Informant Unit
' Homer A, Newman, Jr. Unit Chief
Two Special Agents

Civil Disorders Reporting Unit

Seymor F. Phillips_ Unit Chief
Two Special Agents

Is-2 Section

- Robert L. Shackelford Section Chief
Conrad W, Thompson ; Number 1 Man
’ _3-
' mary
‘ ‘c fa hj

NW 88296 Dochd:32989628 Pagé 420


on + a a
Trotskyist Unit
George J. Lex, Jr.
Three Special Agents

Communist Party Unit
Louis J, Brune, dr.
Three Special Agents

security Informant Unit
Edward BP, Grigalus
Two Special Agents

Extremist-West Unit
Wiliiam N. Preusse
Three Special Agents

Extremist-Hast Unit
Thomas J. McNiff
Three Special Agents

‘Arthur B, Fulton

Fred J, Cassidy

Training Unit
Elmer W. Larson, dr.
Three Special Agents

Central Besearch Tnit
- Robert PP. Finzel
Four Special Agents

Special Records and Related
Research Unit
Russell H, Horner
Two Special Agents

‘Analytical Research Unit

David Ryan
\ Seven Special Agents

\

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 421

Unit Chief
Unit Chief
Unit Chief
Unit Chief
Unit Chief

Section IS-3

Section Chief

Number 1 Man

Unit Chief
Unit Chief
Unit Chief

' Unit Chief


woe W. Raymond Wannall
a . Assistant Director

Thomas W, Leavitt
Inspector - Deputy Assistant Director
Counterintelligence Branch

4:00 p.m, to midnight Supervisor
F. Anthony Tansey

COUNTERINTELLIGENCE BRANCH

Section CI-1

William A, Branigan
Eugene C,. Peterson

Special Cases Unit
“James P., Lee
Five Special Agents

New York Unit
Alfred E. Smith
Five Special Agents

Washington Unit Chief
Wilfred Rk, Schlarman
Four Special Agents

ef

‘Inspector - Deputy Assistant Director

Section Chief

ONTATRSS

©, TNVORMLEION C
Ali Be RASS LE LED EER

BRELE TS UE

WHEERS SHOWN O27

Hunter E, Helgeson

Internal Security Branch

4

Midnight to 8:00 a.m. Supervisor
Harry E. Morris, Jr,

Number 1 Man

Unit Chief |

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

One Special Agent on special assignment at National War College.

Section CI~-2

a]

‘Willdam O. Cregar

James W. Redfield

Section Chief

Number 1 Man

This document is prepared in response

to your request and is not for dissemination

outside your Committee,

Its use is limited.

’ to official proceedings by your Committee and
the .content may not be disclosed to unauthorized
personnel without-the express approval of the FBI,

NW 88296 Dochd:32989628 Page 422 bad

«
“oe eee woth . -3
Mg Sg hte get eye eee ey

$6)
| (Chinese Unit

erbert J. Morgan
Five Special Agents
Satellite Unit
7 Howard H. Wallace
Three Special Agents

Coordination Unit
John P, Thomas
- Two Special Agents

Forrest §. Putman, Jr.

sebastian S. Mignosa

Di nhana T Nast.
nee me ET Ee er

Four Special Agents

Middle East)yUnit
! Carl F, Freeman
| Three Special Agents

| S
(Far EastyUnit
William W. Hamilton
Two Special Agents
(eavas Unit
" . “Charles H. McCarthy
Two Special Agents

ay

Nationality Unit
VYinicio Henry Nasca
Two Special Agents

i
“Homer A, Boynton, Jr.
H. C, Flemister, Jr.
Liaison Supervisors
Six :

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 423. °

Bombing-Antiriot Laws Unit

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Section CI-3

Section Chief

Number 1 Man

Ten tte I Se
_ - VIER VALLOED

Unit: Chief

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Unit Chief

Section CI-4

Section Chief

Number 1 Man

ae)


Foreign Liaison Unit
Robert A. Bermingham Unit Chief
Two Special Agents .

t
o

INTERNAL SECURITY BRANCH
IS-1 Section

Joseph G. Deegan ' Section Chief
William H. Atkinson Number 1 Man

Black Nationalist .and White
Hate ~ Central Unit
William D. Neumann Unit Chief
Two Special Agents

““Kate + HAST UnLT Se ee
Paul E. Nugent Unit Chief
Two Special Agents

|

| Black Nationalist and White
-

|

| Black Nationalist and White

Hate - West Unit
Garnett T. Tunstall Unit Chief
saree Special Agents

. Black. Nationalist - South,
Klan and Informant Unit
Homer A, Newman, Jr. Unit Chief
Two Special Agents
Civil Disorders Reporting Unit:
Seymor F., Phillips ; Unit Chief
Two Special Agents :

I8-2 Section

'+ Robert L. Shackelford Section Chief

Conrad W. Thompson . Number 1 Man

NW 85296 Docid:32989628 Page 424

Lo.


Trotskyist Unit
George J. Lex, Jr.
Three Special Agents

Communist Party Unit
Louis J. Brune, Jr.
Three Special Agents

Security Informant Unit
Edward P, Grigalus
Two Special Agents

Extremist-West Unit
William N. Preusse
Three Special Agents

Extremist~kast Unit
Thomas J. McNiff
Three Special Agents

' Arthur B. Fulton
Fred J. Cassidy

Training Unit
Elmer W. Larson, Jr.
Three Special. Agents

Central Research Unit
- Robert P. Finzel
Four Special Agents

Special Records and Related
Research Unit
Russell H, Horner
Two Special Agents

‘Analytical Research Unit
_ David Ryan
\ Seven Special Agents

A

NW 88296 Docld:32589628 Page 425

Unit Chief

Unit Chief
"Unit Chief
Unit Chiet
Unit Chief

Section IS-3

Section Chief

Number 1 Man

Unit Chief
Unit Chief
‘Unit Chief

' Unit Chief


. 7 7 ; 7 “ } : ” ” ~ = 7 ; = .
; : ‘ i > - aa
A - - oo CONE IRE IAL : . . _ ff3/0'
a | THE NUMBER-OF FBI FIELD OFFICE AGENTS ASSIGNED TO .
. INTERNAL SECURITY. AND COUNTIHERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS
_ Based on a survey of all FBI field office 3, it has been determined that matters relating to

internal security and counterintelligence require the xollowing commitment of manpower in FBI field

offices, stated in terms of equivalent full-year emp. toycues:

@ I Bn _ | Total

’ Assistant .- - ; . Equivalent Full-
‘Special Agents Special Agents Special Agent , Year Agent
In Charge In Charge. Supervisors —«-- Special Agents Employees _
Internal Security ° 2.80. 4,5 Do 47.06 611.07 "7122.68
Countérintelligencé. 2/34 _ BB 46.18 904,29 954.97

' These equivalent full-year employees represent the followin g percentages of total field office agent —

personnel assigned as of Fa/ 28/75:

 @. a mo co Assistant a a So, oe Percent of:
OF mms _ "Special Agents Special Agents ; Special Agent ~~ ’ Total Agent
Te ' In Charge - InCharge Supervisors . Special Agents | Personnel |
Internal Security 4.2% BOB 11.9% 9.8% 95%
‘Counterintelligence 3.5% 3.6% 7° ANT 12 8% 12.6%
a . . . ~; 4 mee i . :
tg prion oy 5 i — -CONFIDANTIAL
4 pect pea : coe
§ ; oo fo . . ' * Glassified Wy 42 & 3

y*

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 426 ©

ao Oe aa rn Se ny he ee ne EP RH ke Re mie es moe 7 8 a 9 MEE nr repre, men emenpeeens ape ertR RTE ND CERNE A FEE 7 TEAS ORME ER eee

. CONBDENFRL

THE NUMBER OF FBI FIELD OFFICE AGENTS ASSIGNED TO
. INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS

cen cae ES

Hage

’ - Based on a survey of all FBI field office 3, it has been determined that matters relating to

internal.security and counterintelligence require the foilowing commitment of manpower in FBI fiela

Special Agents

In Charge
Internal Security 2,80
Counterintelligence 2.34

Assistant

Special Agents
In Charge

1.75

2,16

offices, stated in terms of equivalent full-year employees:

Special Agent
Supervisors

47.06

46.18

Special Agents

671.07

904.29

Total

Equivalent Full-
Year Agent

Employees

954. 97

These equivalent full-year employees represent the following percentages of total field office agent

e

a : Special Agents
in Charge
Intérnal Security 4.2%
Counterintelligence 3.5%
_ pannel 2
po, HOP ep BOI
Bibi

- “Oe

Ff

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 427-.

‘In Charge:

Y

personnel assigned as of 2/28/75:

Assistant
Special Agents

2.9%

'. 8.6%

Special Agent

11.9%

Supervisors

Exempt fron} SDS, Catogory 2& 3 ;
Date of Decks sification Indefinite,

Special Agents -

9,5%

12.8%

Percent of
Total Agent

Personnel

9,5%

12.8%

ameenerpptite tet samewee me”

-CONREETTAL a 7 oo - We

| THE NUMBER OF EBI FIELD OFFICE AGENTS ASSIGNED TO
. INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNTRINTELLIGENCE MATTERS
_ Based on a survey of all FBI field offices, it has been determined that maiters relating to
| internal. security and counterintelligence. require. the following commitment of manpower in FBI field -

offices, stated in terms of equivalent full-year employees:

@ oe | a : Total

. Assistant -- . Equivalent Full-
‘Special Agents Special Agents a Special Agent ; Year Agent
; In Charge In Charge. Supervisors ‘Special Agents Employees
Internal Security 2.80. ‘ 1.75 mo 47,06 _ 671.07 “722.68

Countérintélligence. 2.34 B16 46.18 ~ 904,29 954.97

These equivalent full-year employees represent the following percentages of total field office agent

personnel assigned as of 2/28/75:

@. oO - So Assistant - oo, ; Percent of:
Pa . Special Agents Special Agents . Special Agent — ' Total Agent
oe ; ' In Charge In Charge — _ Supervisors . Special Agents | Personnel —
Intérnal Security 4.2% 2.9% > 0 11.9% 9.5% 9.5%
| 12. 8% 12.6%

Counterintelligence 3.5% 3.6%

an | -  wPMPelG
vestnsoenh weenie ete

BEL Bel — ,

ce

“NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 428


THE NUMBER OF FBI FIELD OFFICE AGENTS ASSIGNED TO
INTERNAL SECURITY AND COUNT:ERINTELLIGENCE MATTERS

Based on a survey of all FBI field offices, it has been determined that matters relating to_
internal security and counterintelligence require the following commitment of manpower in FBI field

offices, stated in terms of equivalent full-year empioyves:

. . Total
to Assistant . Equivalent Full-
Special Agents Special Agents Special Agent Year Agent —
In Charge In Charge Supervisors Special Agents Employees
Internal Security —-2..80 175 47.06 671.07 722.68

Counterintelligence 2.34 2.16 46.18 ~ . 904, 29 954, 97

These equivalent full-year employees represent the following percentages of total field office agent

personnel assigned as of 2/28/75:

Assistant Percent of
* Special Agents Special Agents ~ Special Agent Total Agent
In Charge In Charge Supervisors Special Agents Personnel
Internal Security 4.2% 2.9% 1, 9% 9. 5% 9. 5%
Counterintelligence 3.5% 3.6% 11.7% 12.8% . 12. 6%
7 geek —— CONFID NTIAL
+ Q assific: 4
+? on Exempt fyhin SDS, | Category? 2&3

| agsilication ladefinite
__ NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 429 a fae


. . .
: ; ’

SUTIONAL FGM NO. 16 £610~106 5 . 7
\« Sageot ct. 27h : ee é Assos. Div
yo UNITED SIQ@ES GOVERNMENT < T Dep! AD’ hin.
e " , . : - Dop. AD Inv. 2
- Memorandum 7 tab

tot
Admin, —~)

Comp. Syst, W...

: Ext. Affoirs _...

TO : Mr. J. B. Adains pare: 3-21-75 . ci om
_ Ident. -
Ny ne . 7 ari Oe & . Inspection

FROM : Legal Comnseh ALD INFORMATIO 3b armen a a Sh Intell.

: HEREIN 1S UNCLASSEFIED “EARP OT.

. sate lato! BY AE edict ( Pee 1

supjyecT: JOHN T, ELLUFF are) Spes. Inv
_ ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF POLITICS “ Trabslag —— .

f Telephone Rm.
\ a RRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ‘ ; Director Sec'y
WALTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS i . {
tr. |
av) aim

7 On 3-18-75 Professor Jolt. Ellitf advised Inspector John: B. ~
Hotis that he had-been contacted by WillianAMiller, Staff Director for the
« Senate Select Committee on Jutelligence chivities, and was asked to serve '
“as Director of the Committee's Task Force on Domestic Intelligence. This
“is one of four Task Forces being formed by the Select Committee and it
will focus primarily on the activities of the FBI. The other Task Forces

are on Foreign Intelligence, Military and Technological Intelligence, and

>
ss

L174 wry

gpI 69. 4/52 |

Command and Control.

Ell said he had not decided whether to accept the offer
and believed that others were also being considered for the position. He
Said he was reluctant to do anything that would interfere with the excellent
working srrargemats he had developed with the Bureau. He feels that his »
initial obligation is te the Director, and the purpose of going to the Police
Foundation was to get formal support for a project that would be of primary
benefit to the Bureau and only secondarily to the Attorney General and Congress
He said he would be guided by our judgment in this matter and not want to
break any commitments that he might have made with the Bureau. CE

If he accepts the appointment H1liff said he would, of course,
suspend work on his research project until he had terminated his employment
with the Committee. He said he would also agree not to use any classified
material that he acquired in his capacity as Task Force Director. HILitt
has discussed this matter with John Heaphy, Assistant Director of the Police
Foundation. Heaphy said the Foundation had no opjections whatsoever for
his accepting the position with the Senate Select Committee, and he would
be free to, negume his project after the Committee work, was done.

OE RECO GA <M CIPS SQ. |

NAL FI

ORIGT

Gate. Goes

1-Mr. Adams NOT x4 “CORDED ag YY BEATS
1 ~ Mr. Wannall 02 APR 10 1975 “D ; _ ‘
1 -Mr. Mints “be
t -Mr. Reed Aylfe” ee eee:
rineton aes
4. HaAPI Ra {075 CONTINUED - OVER
‘. “TBE: deg (7)
ds j

NW 88296 Doecid: 32989628 Page 430, ; ~


rT— * _ TT sae see —_— coer

we, ane : , , ~ 7 *
me a y <. i
woot \ ’ . “ , _~
A]

Legal Counsel to Adams Memo
RE: JOHN T. ELLIFE

It should be noted that the Select Committee considered
offering the position to Larrpeaskir, Counsel to the President's Clemency
Board... Mr. Baskir formerly Served as Chief Counsel to Senator Ervin's
Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights, and we had numerous contacts
(\, with him in that capacity. Our purpose was to reach some common agreement
oy on privacy legislation that Senator Ervin planned to introduce in the 93rd
Session of Congress. There were numerous rocetings with Baskir on the
same subject in the Deputy Attorney General's office. These efforts proved
unsuccessful and after several months we discontinued the discussions.
In our opinion, Mr. Baskir was unwilling to work out any reasonable
compromise and seemed unsympathetic to the 16¢iSlation concerns of law
enforcement.

It is clear that this is a matter for Professor EMif to
determine and the Bureau should not express an official opinion. Although
we have not always agreed with his views on intelligence matters, we
have had no occasion to question his objectivity or his integrity as a scholar.
Mr. Miller knows that Professor Rliiff enjoys cur confidence and it is
our under standing that he offered HIliff the position in order to avoid an
adversary relationship between the Bureau and the Committee.

Professor Ellitt said he would make no commitments to
the Senate Committee until he hears from us.

RECOMMENDATION: (
That Pxofessor Elliff be advised that it would be inappropriate

for us to express an opinion on whether he should accept the appointment
offered by the Senate Select Committee. \

. é
| ae / ja” ne
i (e Wan” _ ah \ oy,
t s . Aas
. ( yf \ J aa i‘ . (Uys ;
oy eo
wo,
7 2.

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 434

DHEMLS

BS

LASSTFIED

Leal 3

BLL ZUFON SET ON connatasy> 2, a

AERc.. MONE

ae
DAR Oy fo

SUBJECT: “Eenerooy 78>)

_ NW 88296 Docld: lek, LA doze

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10 5010-106
MAM 1962. EDITION

GSA GEN. REG, 80, 27

UNITER STATES G

Memorandum

Assoc. Dir.
Dep. AD Adm. _
Dop. AD Inv. __
Asst. Dir:
Admin,
Comp. Syst. —_
“ Ext. Affairs

-RNMENT

1 - Mr. Callahan
1 - Mr, Adams

: Mr. W. R. Wannall Mai DATE: 3/31/75 “— Files & Com.
Gen, Inv.
1 - Mr. Mintz Inonaion
: We. On titogar 1 = Mr. Wannall Intell.
ye 1 - Mr. Hotis Leber
1 - Mr. Cregar Plon.& vd].

Spec. Inv.

Training
Telephone Rm. __
Director Sec’y __

This memorandum reports the results of a meeting
of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group on Congressional Review of fa
the Intelligence Community (hereafter referred to as the Nee
Group), held at CIA Headquarters on the afternoon of 3/25/75.

nee wane we

This meeting was chaired by Mr. Colby in his role
as the Director of Central Intelligence. In attendance were
Mr. Philip Buchen, Counsel to the President; the then Deputy .
AG Laurence Silberman, Associate Deputy AG James Wilderotter; ii
Mr. John Clarke, as well as officials from Defense, Treasury
National Security Council, Office of Management and Budget,
and the Energy Research and Development Administration.

The following items of interest were discussed:

Mr. William G. Miller, Staff Director of the Senate
Select Committee (SSC), and the Committee's Counsel, Mr. F.A.0.
Schwarz, III, visited CIA Headquarters to discuss SSC business.
Mr. Miller suggested that a tactic the SSC was considering is
the identification of several key issues that the Committee
could look into in-depth, For example, the SSC might propose
to identify two or three covert actions engaged in by CIA and

examine them in-depth rather than try to cover each and every
covert action CIA might identify. Colby advised that this
appeared to be an encouraging development and possibly each
agency of the Intelligence Community might be asked to provide
a series of key issues from which the Select Committee could =< }
select one or two for an yor eau: Z, 5
oR (od -[lle B¥ 57
The question aff Signing a Secrecy
Agreement is still not Settled. “whe Staff Director raised
some constitutional questions regarding the Secrecy Agreement,
Mr. Schwarz admitted, however, that some type of “Arrangememt=<—
would have to be made to insure that the Intelligence Community
had some protection against unauthorized disclos réSi bR-Ssmtt
members of the SSC. 4
Ce

Ene osures
WoC:e
(7)

ANZ
ewe

CONTINUED - OVER

we ar?
Y


Memorandum for Mr, Wannall
RE: SENSTUDY 75

Both Miller and Schwarz accepted the Third Agency
Rule and agreed to abide by it. For the record, the SSC's
interpretation of the Third Agency Rule (which is consistent
with the Intelligence Community) is as follows: Classified
information or material originating in one department shall
not be disseminated outside any other department to which it
has been made available without the consent of the originating
department.

The Security Committee of the United States Intelli-
gence Board (USIB} will meet to develop some ground rules and
standardization for sanitizing documents to be furnished to
the Select Committees.

The question of Intelligence Community personnel being
represented by counsel was discussed. The position of the White
House on this issue has been fully reported in a memorandum from
the Legal Counsel to Mr, Adams, dated 3/27/75, entitled "Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence Activities, Rodney Hills
Associate Counsel to the President."

It was also agreed at the meeting of 3/25/75 that the
President's Counsél would attempt to negotiate with the SSC to
insure that all interviews of Intelligence Community personnel
would be conducted on the premises of the bureau, agency or
department employing the persons to be interviewed.

Attached also for the record are the following:

A letter dated 3/20/75 from Staff Director William G.
Miller to Mr. John Clarke advising that Mr. Ben Marshall has been
designated as the Security Officer of the SSC; f

A letter dated 3/17/75 from Mr. Miller to Mr. Clarke
listing employees of the SSC who have been cleared by the
Committee for certification by CIA for access to classified
information up to and including "Top Secret";

A letter from Mr. Miller to Mr. Clarke dated 3/20/75

advising that Mr. Ben Marshall was cleared for access to
classified information up to and including "Top Secret";

CONTINUED - OVER

NW 85296 Docid:32989628 Page 433


Memorandum for Mr. Wannall *
RE: SENSTUDY 75

A memorandum from the Chairman of the USIB Security
Committee advising that arrangements had been perfected for
the delivery of classified documents to the SSC and describing
how such documents should be delivered,

ACTION:
For informationand record purposes,
yr ron

Gus

| NW 88296 Dochd:329896028 Page 434


ee

“

FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMAN ( C
JOHN G. TOWER,STEXAS, VICE CHAIRMAN: __

PHILIP A, HART, MIGH. HOWARD H. BAKER, 4 TENN.
WALTER F. MONDALE, MINN, BARRY GOLDWATE! °
WALTER D, HUDDLESTON, KY. CHARLES MCC. MAI , IR., MD.

ROBERT MORGAN, N.C. RICHARD S. SCHWEIKRE PA.
GARY HART, COLO. “

WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR

‘Muites States Denale

SELECT COMMITTEE TO
STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH ad
RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT To S. RES. 21, SITH CONGRESS)
WASHINGTON, D.C, 20510

Merch 20, 1975

Mr. John Clarke

Associate Deputy to the D/DCI/IC
Central Intelligence Agency
2430 E Street, N. W.

Washington, DT. C. 20505

Dear John:
~ Mr. Ben Marshall, Security Officer of the Select.
Committee on Intelligence Activities, has been designated
Compartmentation Officer. .
Sincerely,

M/ Ween. Ott j iil.

William G. Miller

-ENCLOSURK

(62 “Me 39S.

NW 68296 Docid:32989628 Page 435
ee 7

D> FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHARM: 1
a JOHN G, TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAI
PHILIP A, HART, MICH. HOWARD H. BAKEQQP 1, TENN. ae
WALTER F. MONDALE, MINN, BARRY GOLDWATEr., ARIZ. “
WALTER D. HUDDLESTON, KY, CHARLES MCG, MATHIAS, JR., MD, .
ROBERT MORGAN, N.C. RICHARD S, SCHWEIXER, PA, ry °
Ee Miniter Biates Benete
e+
WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAPF DIRECTOR 2. . es eg *

SELECT COMMITTEE TO
STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH
‘ RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT To S. RES. 721, 6TH CONGRESS) —
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

March 17, 1975

Mr. John Clarke _ b
Associate Deputy to the D/DCI/Ic Te waelé
Central Intelligence Agency awh serous COT
2430 E Street, N. W. “SERRIN FS CLASSIF :
_ Washington, D. C. 20505 page f BY 2/
< Dear John: . .

Thank you for your letter of March 13, ovtlining a
procedure for clearance for the Select Committee staff. The
od procedure you have suggested has been adopted and attached

to this letter is the Select Committee's first listing of staff
who have been cleared by the Committee. This listing is the
result of the investigation undertaken by the FBI and a con-
sideration of the FBI reports on individuals by the Chairmen.
As further investigations by the FBI are received, we will send
additional persons to be granted clearances. Soe

As to aceess to compartmentalized information, those

members of the staff who will be designated will be indicated
to you in subsequent communications .

William G. Miller

With best wishes,

Enclosure

ENCLOSURE |
ee eee “5

NW 88296 Docid:32989628 Page 436
a

a


_ o

ATTACHMENT

The following start officials of the Senate Select Committee . °
as identified below by date and place of birth and social security
number have received a security investigation by the Federal Bureau. .

; a of Investigation within the past five years and are hereby certified.
as meeting the requirements of Executive Order 10450 for access to .

classified information up to and including Top Secret.

NAME pare a. BIACE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NO.
(Charity Benz. | ‘7-23-46 sO... - 053-38-T410
Michael Taylor Epstein 3-10-37 Mass. 026-28-6318
7” Maxie Henry Gitéhstein Oo BAT HG Ala. | ——-4h20-60-8767
Audrey Helen Hatry — 6-10-23 a 16-14-8901
Lawrence Kieves | 1-48 N.Y. . _ 068-38-646h
Michael James Madigan en B-43 D.C. O42-34-3797
Eliot Everett Maxwell  Peehnh NY. .133-3h-h225 7
Martha Evans Mecham 2-11-ho = Cad. . 528-148-6848
Tames Daniel O'Flaherty qi-bke The . 239-62-8h95
gan Orloff ; W-1h-47 Cal. 558-7-839%
John F, Peterson © G-15-H1 Cal. (565-56-TT0T
Lewis Brittle Snider 1-12-h5 . N.C. 26-72-0956

Burton Victor Wides 6-Th-hy Nid. 139~30-1936

As the FBI completes its investigative work, other names will

be sent to you.

NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 437


o

+ __ FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMAN.
7 JOHN G, TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIRMAN

af PHIUP A, HARO, MICH. . HOWARD H. BAKER, 3F., TENN,

AA Hos Staif

AS - / & /
WALTER D, HUDDLESTON, KY. CHARLES MCC. M, SS, JR, MO,
ROBERT MORGAN, N.C. RICHARD S. SCH!

WALTER F. MONDALE, MINN. BARRY GOLDWATER ARIZ, "
1 PAS
ens q “Marites Dt res $
WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR W. TUTLe: ai i BITS
SELECT COMMITTEE TO

, . STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH
. RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES — >

(PURSUANT Yo S. RES. 21, 91TH CONGRESS)
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510 °

March 20, 1975 _

Mr. John Clarke

Associate Deputy to the D/DCI/IC
Central Intelligence Agency
2430 E Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20505

Dear John:

The following staff member of the Senate Select Committee
on Intelligence Activities as identified below by date and .
place of birth and social security number has received a
security investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation
a within the past five years and is hereby certified as meeting
. the requirements of Executive Order 10:50 for access to
classified information up to and including Top Secret.

‘ Benjamin Mershall, May.4, 1919, Walnut (now Verdigre)
; Nebraska, soe sec no 485-28-4530

Sincerely, -

Wbhinb billy

William G. Miller

- | . le. WES? 7 = 4

ww 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 438


bj

l

4

x

Fr MOR

My G5:

ie

Cael
‘ohn

Da

o

TE

i
:

wah

SUED STATES INTELLIGENCE BARD
| SECURITY COMMITTEE

we

a at ‘

SECOM-D-49
21 March 1975

MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman, Ad Hoc Group of USIB on
Congressional Review

SUBJECT : Security - Arrangements for Receipt of Classified
Material by Senate Select Committee

I. On 19 March 1975 I telephonically inquired of Mr. Benjamin C.
Marshall, Security Officer of the Senate Select Committee, whether he
' was in a position to begin receiving classified documents, He advised
that arrangements had been perfected and that effective 20 March 1975
such documents could be delivered as follows:

The courier should enter the ist and C Street entrance
of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, inquire of the guard as
_to the location of Room G308, go to the front door of G308,
advise the guard there that material is being delivered and
have him call Mr. Marshall or Charity Benz, both of whom
are authorized to receive classified documents up to and
including TOP SECRET*, ’

2, Mr. Marshall requested that prior to delivery he or someone
in his office be telephonically advised (224-1700) of the impending
delivery and the estimated time of arrival so that he or someone from
his office can be available. He also stated that if delivery was desired
to a specific staff member, Mr. Marshall would try and have such
person available, but stated he was authorized to accept documents
for members of the Committee and staff,

'3, The Committee has not yet advised as to compartmented
clearances but Mr. Marshall has been designated Compartmentation

* Mr. Patrick Shea is expected to be added as a person to receive
documents but the certification for this access to classified material

has not as yet been received by your office.

ENCLOSURE _. Ss /
le -/{ / (2? 29s

NW 682796 Docid:32989628 Page 439


. stag, 7
Officer and has advised that the same delivery arrangements will
be in effect for compartmented material. When necessary clearance
arrangements have been perfected so‘that delivery of compartmented

material can begin, you will be advised.

a € Mfaae__.
Donald E. Moore
Chairman

NW 88296 Dochd:32969628 Page 440


