[1]DARAAN - -
[2]1f04-10304-10000 j 2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
[6]wae Aix 1002
[7]ath 5
[9]8 January 1979
[11]MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Personnel
[13]SUBJECT : Annual Fitness Report - George Joannides
[14]Operations Officer
[15]S-1
[17]ESN 064818] Z3
[18]OB 5 July 1922
[21]- 1. This Memorandum in Lieu of Fitness Report is prepared
[22]_in accordance with HR 20-20, for the period mid-June 1978 through
[23]' 12 January 1979. The occasion of the Fitness Report is the
[24]retirement of the rating official.
[26]2. The undersigned was detailed in mid-May ‘to serve
[27]as the Agency’ s Principal Coordinator for work with the House
[28]Select Committee on Assassinations. As it became apparent that the volume
[29]of the work required assignment of additional full-time personnel, the
[30]decision was made. that one experienced officer was needed to handle
[31]the DDO account. A senior officer experienced in DDO work and available
[32]to serve for several months was requested. Mr. Joannides was known to
[33]the undersigned by reputation, although not personally, and arrangements
[34]were made for his detail to the work. While there is no way to outline
[35]the qualifications that. one should have for this sort of work, it
[36]became quickly clear that Mr. Joannides was the perfect man for it.
[38]3. Mr. Joannides was responsible for a new procedure in
[39]recording of exchanges with the HSCA. As it developed, the Agency's
[40]logs and records on the status of requests by the HSCA and the Agency's poe
[41]responses - became the only reliable record; it was clear that the HSCA seated:
[42]often did not know the status of business in this respect and time
[43]and time again had to come to this office for clarification. Beyond
[44]that. early contribution to the ordering of the affairs of the office,
[45]Mr. Joannides handled day-to-day follow-ups of requirements by
[46]telephone with the DDO focal point as well as throughout the DDO.
[47]Further, the firm position that he took with the young investigators
[48]in response to aggressive harassment on some occasions was exactly
[49]what the situation called for. A person of his maturity and experience
[50]handled the job exactly as required by the situation. If the peculiar
[51]nature of the work did not call on Mr. Joannides.for all the talents of Berner
[52]his wide experience, it nonetheless was his experience and quick So
[53]perceptions that ensured a superior performance. His advice and
[55]Co
[56]Zhne_\\14
[59]13-00000
[61]counselling on courses of action to cope with unique situations
[62]was always sound and responsible.
[64]4. The work in this assignment provided Tittle occasion
[65]for Mr. Joannides to demonstrate. attitudes on either EEO matters or |
[66]economy considerations that are required by regulation for comment
[67]in Fitness Reports. As a result, no comment is made.
[69]5. Not because of the demands on his superior talents,
[70]but because of the cool. efficacy. with which he handled an unusual
[71]special assignment, Mr.. Joannides' work is evaluated as Outstanding.
[73]3h ~—. Z_* y ,
[74]S. D. Breckinridge
[76]I certify that I have seen the comments in the Narrative section
[77]of this memorandum. .
[79]« Q a qy
[80]Date
[82]Ete | :
[85](When Filled In)
[86]. ’ EMPLOYEE SERIAL-NUMBER .
[87]064818]
[88]ENERAL
[89]DATE OF BIRTH [3. ee a9 5. SI
[90]6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE | ora OF | oes 8. CURRENT STATION
[91]Ops. Officer Die /Sh.3.
[92][x_[esnees [ [ness [rsupenany | [nuns rsa
[93]eaneenrncvatnne Gov nemo Sect [RK [awmwan | ae atrewnen iruover:
[94]On a i SO
[95]11. DATE REPORT DUE IN:0.P. 12. REPORTING PERIOD (From- to) :
[96]. 1 April 1963 - 31 March 1964
[97]SECTION B “PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ‘
[98]W - Weak Performance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfoctory. A rating in this category requires
[99]Oo “positive remedial action. .The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on
[100]probation, to reassignment. or to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in Section C,
[101]A~ Adequate - Performance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency nor
[102]" excellence.
[103]P - Proficient Performance Is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced inc proficient manner,
[104]|S. Strong Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency. ;
[105]O - Outstanding Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of
[106]. others doing similer work os to warrant special recognition.
[108]SPECIFIC DUTIES
[110]List up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the
[111]menner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees
[112]with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised): os .
[114]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1 RATING
[115]Supervises and manages the Station's covert action ‘branch which
[116]employs een} s spott officers: and Coven, gonna’ employees. mies -[8)
[118]RATING
[119]LETTER
[121]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2 ae
[122]Serves as senior, case: officer for a student project. which: involves
[123]distribution: of printed . propaganda,: production of. radio programs ; Ww _-
[124]and the development of political action programs: , ; {s]
[126]SPECIFIC OUTY. NO. 3 . 7 RATING
[127]Maintains liaison with the FL, CI and PM branch chiefs, in- order QP Tee |
[128]to.insure that the Station's covert action effort is appropriatel py
[129]supporting the missions of -the other branches. : ~
[131]SPECIFIC OUTY NO. 4 aa . ue . ute RATING
[132]Conducts production and security. reviews on the Btation' s covert
[133]action operations: - ; : ; Lo,
[137]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5 - ce : . mo, . Cos so T RATING
[138]an a : : LETTER
[140]SPECIFIC DUTY NO.6 =" os ne Te ~ RATING
[143]RATING
[144]LETTER
[146]of”.
[148]Yonc.
[150]Take into gecount evel rything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his « current position such as per-
[151]formance of specific ies, productivity, conduct on n joe cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and
[152]particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the-rating period,
[153]place the letter in the rating box corresponding t to the statement which most accurately reflects | his level of performance.
[154]we
[157]rgeé 45 ossovete PREVious EDITIONS. SEE
[159]13-00000
[161]ae . (When Filled In)
[163]SECTION C NARRATIVE COMMENTS __ :
[165]Indicate sj nificant strerfgths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping af pre tive their relationship to
[166]overall perfor iormance, State suggestions made for improvement of work performance, Give Oe B Sheree! ning. Comment
[167]on foreign language competence, if required for current position, Amplify or explain ratings given in Sect! b provide best
[169]basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties must be described, if
[170]applicable. veking, dedicates ana Weddle trtacer who »
[171]Subject is a hard working, dedicated and e shoes AE Sper who has
[172]proven by performance that he can accomplish assigned o onal tasks
[173]in allowable time limits. The period covered byy Per is fitness report
[174]represents Subject'’s initial Agency exposure to thosWdfdrst echelon
[175]management responsibilities which 1sfe ‘implicit in a branch chief's
[176]assignment in a Station that ha, ag, 613) employees, Subject responded
[177]to the challenge of the first echelon supervisory responsibilities
[178]in an exemplary manner. Subject managed a branch that had a yearly
[179]budget of two million four hundred thousand dollars, These funds
[180]were judiciously spent on printed propaganda, white and black radio
[181]programs, and on..political action operations which were implemented .
[182]via labor, student,.and-professional groups. Subject has the knack of ©
[183]judiciously blending quality with quantity and in this melding effort,
[184]Subject reflected.cost consciousness and effectiveness in the use of
[185]personnel, space equipment ,and funds. Subject has a distinct flair
[186]for political action operations | and can translate policy directives
[187]into meaningful action programs by all of his assets. Subject has the
[188]ability to delegate authority and to appropriately fix responsibility
[189]with those officers: whom he supervises. In the management. field} .
[190]Subject's. only discernible weakness is a tendency to be abrupt with
[191]subordinates. It is believed that this minor shortcoming will be
[192]overcome with the acquisition of added experience in the field of
[193]personnel management,.:On balance therefore, Subject's overall perfor-
[194]mance as a supervisor and as an intelligence. officer warrants. an 9
[196]SECTION D CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS evaluation eR CONTEATED)
[198]BY EMPLOYEE
[199]{ CERTIFY THAT! HAVE SEEN SECTIONS Ar B, AND C OF THIS’ REPORT _
[201]BY SUPERVISOR
[202]Tif THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION
[204]MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN
[205]UNDER MY- SUPERVISION
[207]TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE
[209]22 months
[210]s/ Andrew K. REUTEMAN
[212]DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR
[213]15 May 1964 Chief of Station, JMWAVE| (signed in pseudo on Fld. Trans J)
[215]BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL :
[217]SouMeNTs OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL
[219]Although I have had few chances to personally observe
[220]work, I concur in the supervisor's comments and
[221]rating due to my general impression of—@@@iiiie capabilities
[222]and performance of duty received in occasional meetings
[223]extending over a number of years.
[225]OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL
[227]Deputy Chief, WH (SA)
[229]DATE
[230]i June 1964
[232]13-00000
[234]ms
[236]CONTINUATION SHEET
[238]“Section C - Narrative Comments °
[240]Subject has additional growth potential as an intelligence
[241]_ officer and as a first echelon supervisor of individuals doing
[242]a basic intelligence task. Ethnic origins, foreign language
[243]fluency and experience acquired to date generally dictates a
[244]career for Subject in the general arena. of Greek operations.
[245]While the major thrust of Subject's career orientation should
[246]be geared toward Greece and its related problems, it is believed
[247]that it is essential, that, on a periodic basis, Subject be directed
[248]into non-Greek areas of interest, in order that the continued
[249]challenge of new horizons will stimulate Subject to develop to
[250]his full capacity. In practical terms, this means that out of
[251]any eight-year time cycle, at least two years should be spent
[252]by Subject on non-Greek or even non-European affairs. This
[253]officer has the potential to be a broad-gauged officer but he
[254]must be stimulated and led in that direction which will fully
[255]harness the totality of his. potential. .
[257]The rating officer would be pleased to have Subject work
[258]with him at any other Field Station that might be entrusted to
[259]the rating officer.
[262]13-00000
[268]' oo 3. SEX 4. GRADE
[269] ppenpwaliiimmaime {5 sux 1322 MASA 7
[270]6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE = — 0)” vo oo pt ; ) é :
[272]____~ OPS OFFICER —_
[274]| SPECIAL (Specify): ~ ; ;
[275]12. REPORTING PERIOD (From- to)” : vs
[276]> 1 January 1963 - 31: aly 1963.9
[277]: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION -. "|.
[279]Performance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating In this category requires
[280]_ positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from:counseling, to further training, to placing on: |.
[281]probation, to reassignment of to separation, Describe action taken or proposed in Section Cc.
[283]A - Adequate Performance meets al! requirements. It is entirely satisfactory ond ts ‘characterized neither by deficiency nor
[284]excellence.
[286]- Proficient Performance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced ina proficient | manner.
[287]S - Strong Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.
[289]O - Outstanding Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of
[290], others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.
[292]List up to six of the most important specific duties performed during, the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the
[293]manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. Al! employees
[294]|with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of omployeos supervised).
[296]‘| SPECIFIC DUTY NO. ‘ RATING
[298]LETTER
[299]Deputy Chief of Branch handling (in absence of Chief) all aspects
[300]of politicalyaction., ,and psychological warfare activity and
[302]2 fFourteett case officers and clerical personnel. f
[303]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2 RATING
[305]Case officer for student project involving political action, LETTER
[306]propaganda, intelligence collection and a hemisphere-wide apparatus. BI)
[307]é 3
[309]SPECIFIC DUTYNO.3 | ; RATING
[310]; ; . : LETTER
[312]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4 : : RATING
[313]LETTER
[315]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5 : j i Bay _ RATING
[316]., : LETTER
[318]‘[SPECIFIC DUTY NO.6 . . . j im oe, . 7 RATING
[319]. : : : LETTER
[321]_OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION
[322]- RATING
[323]Take into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness In his current position such as per- | LETTER
[324]formance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on fe cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and :
[325]particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period, (s7
[326]place the letter in the rat ex corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance. |_,.'
[328]17 OCT 1b3, ,
[329]FORM 45 opsoLeTe PREVIOUS EDITIONS. _ SECRET— G
[330]= Sane.
[333]13-00000
[335]. *
[336]’ (When Filled In)
[338]| SECTION Cc 2 fa NARRATIVE COMMENTS
[340]Indicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated In current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to.
[341]overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment
[342]on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best
[344]basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties must be described, if
[345]applicable. . : . ;
[346]Reference is made to paragraph C of subject's previous fitness report
[347]dated 10 January 1963 which is still applicable. During the period
[348]covered by this report subject has done an excellent job in the handling
[349]of a significant student exile group which hitherto had successfully
[350]resisted any important degree of control. Under subject's direction
[351]an exile teachers' group reached a high level of effectiveness in the
[352]propaganda field and was turned over to another case officer.
[354]Subject has effectively terminated unproductive operations in the prop
[355]field (one magazine and a news letter) and is building up Station radio
[356]capability directed at the maintarget. ;
[358]His high professional standards, complete comprehension of the problems [
[359]faced by the Station and strong. urge to win in our struggle with the
[360]opposition make it a distinct pleasure to see him take over as Chief
[361]of the PW branch.
[363]SECTION D CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS
[365]is : : : BY EMPLOYEE
[367]! CERTIFY THAT | HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C.OF THIS REPORT
[369]DATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE | . -
[371]| JUL 3.1 B83 /s/ Walter D, NEWBY (signed in pseudo on Fla. Transmittal)
[372]2. - BY SUPERVISOR
[374]MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION
[375]UNDER MY SUPERVISION
[377]TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE
[379]15 months .
[380]OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR
[381]/s/ Robert K, TROUCHARD
[383]DATE
[384]31 July 1963 Chief, PW (signed in pseudo on "ld. Trans.}
[386]3. : BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL :
[388]COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFIclaAL — The Reviewing O cer is familiar with Subject’s
[389]work based primarily on discussions with Subject. and Subjects supervisor,
[390]general observation of Subject during the past year and frequently review-
[391]ing his completed work. Subject is an extremely hard working, dedicated
[392]individual with an ability to develop rapport quickly with his contacts.
[393]Subject works long hours including weekends without complaining and is
[394]always available when there is a job to be done. Subject has demonstra-—
[395]ted those’ qualities of management, initiative,’ drive and devotion to
[396]duty that are necessary to perform the many and varied tasks of a fast
[397]and continually changing’ situation. The Reviewing Officer-concurs ‘with
[398]the Rating Officer's overall evaluation of Strong} oF
[400]OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL /s/ D OR PRINTED NAME_AND SIGNATURE
[401]8 HURST
[403]- ‘Frederick J. INGI
[404]-Deputy Chief of Station (signed in pseudo-on Fld. Trans.)
[407]13-00000
[411](When Filled In)
[413]Indicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to
[414]overall performance. Stote suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment
[415]on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide bes?
[416]basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties must-be described, if
[417]applicable, : : >
[419]No change from previous report Submitted 19 January 1963.
[421]~ CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS
[422]BY EMPLOYEE - =
[423]1 CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, 8B, AND C OF THIS REPORT _.-
[425]DATE ‘ SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE . , ‘
[426]_27 March 63 /s/ Walter D, NEWBY (signed on Field Transmittal) -
[427]7 BY SUPERVISOR - ; j
[429]MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN IF THIS.REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION .
[430]UNDER MY SUPERVISION y : . —_
[432](DATE . . . : OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR - : . TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE —
[433]. oe /s/ Robert _K, TROUCHARD
[435]27 March 63 Chief, PW Branch signed on Field Transmittal)
[437]: = : : BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL . :
[439]COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL :
[443]OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE
[445]a oe | /s/ Andrew K, REUTEMAN
[446]Chief of Station, JMWAVE | . 14
[449]13-00000 -
[451]a}
[453]> SECRET Cc
[454]~~ C€When Filled In} 00000 “oo.
[456]“J EMPLOYEE SERIAL‘
[457]ve _
[459]Os Ce LLP)
[461]2. DATE OF BIRTH |3. SEX 4. GRADE /|5. SD
[462]ali g duly 1922 fae [6smah 9 |
[463]6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE
[465]OPS OFFICER DDP/S.A.S- JMWAVE 45 fuca
[467][Jareetan Groote SSS*d =i ra
[469]11. DATE REPORT DUE IN O.P. j 12. REPORTING PERIOD (From- to-)
[470]1 January 1963 — 31 March 1963
[471]| j PERFORMANCE EVALUATION . :
[473]- Performance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly leas than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires
[474]fo. positive remedial action.. The hature: of-the-action could range fron’ counseling, to further training,.to placing on
[476]| | FITNESS REPORT
[477]SECTION Air7 221 PED) hag
[479](Las (First) (en mM d
[483]W- Weak
[485]probation, to:reassignmient of to separetion. Describe action taken of-proposed in Section C..
[486]A + Adequate Performance meets al! requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency nor
[488]a excellence. ; .
[489]P - Proficient’ Performance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.
[490]S- Strong . Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.
[492]O - Outstanding Performance is so exceptional in relation. to requirements of the work and in comparison to'the performance of
[493]others doing similar work as to’weorrant special recognition. —
[495]“SPECIFIC DUTIES
[497]List up to six of the most important’ specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the
[498]manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees
[500]with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to. supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).
[501]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1 ° — ——— ——— RATING
[502]1 ! LETTER
[503]RATING
[504]LETTER
[505]RATING
[506]LETTER
[507]RATING
[508]LETTER
[509]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 5 j . . ; ; RATING
[510]. . LETTER
[511]oo, 8 .
[512]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6 ; ) RATING |.
[513]SUE Dy ALLO CL st + : . . LETTER
[515]OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION
[516]: RATING
[517]PS
[519]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2
[521]SPECIFIC DUTY NO.
[523]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4
[525]Take into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as per-
[526]formance of specific dutles, productivity, conduct on jee cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and
[528]particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's ‘overall performance duting the rating period,
[529]place the letter in the rating box-coffesponding to the statement which p
[531]ost accurately reflects his fevel of performance.
[533](When Filled In)
[535]6. OFFICIAL POSITION’ TITLE
[537]OPS OFFICER
[539]42s REPORTING PERIOD [Front rs as
[540]2 cae ee ~ January” 1962 = 31. December. 1962
[541]PER ORMANCE EVALUATION = ue we :
[543]Performance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satiefactory. A rating in this category requires
[544]. positive remedial action.:-The ature of the action could range frém. counseling, to further training, to placing on
[545]probation, to reassignment of to separation. Describe action taken or proposed in’ Secti jon C.
[547]A - Adequate — Performance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and 1s characterized | neither by deficiency nor
[548]excellence.
[550]P= Proficient.. Performance is more than sotisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.
[551]S = Strong Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.
[553]O - Outstanding Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of
[554]; ; others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.
[556][bist up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. . Insert rating letter which best describes the
[557]manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees
[558]with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).
[560]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 1 RATING
[561]Deputy Chief of Branch handling (in absence of Chief) all aspects | Serre
[562]political action and psychological warfare and supervising (fifteen)
[563]case officers and clerical personnel, Py 6) &
[565]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2 RATING
[566]Case Officer for student project involving political action, rena
[567]propaganda, intelligence collection and hemisphere-wide
[568]apparatus. ‘
[570]SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3 RATING
[571]Case Officer for teacher's organization engaged in hemisphere- ae
[572]wide ‘press and radio » Propaganda. ow
[574]SPECIFIC ‘DUTY. NO.4.. .
[576]; . ya RATING
[577]Case. ‘Officer on. project. Producing . news - letter aimed: at ‘press. a “ey
[578]outlets . in'Latin America... 00 oe mee, Chg
[580]SPECIFIC OUTY.NO. 8 .. RATING
[582]Maintains. contacts “with key elements of a. veteran’ S type. a - "ay
[583]organization. as.a » developmental Project. Z
[585]SPECIFIC ouTY NO. 6 RATING
[587]LETTER
[589]OVERALL PERFORMANCE. IN.CURRENT POSITION
[590]Take Into account everything about the employee which Influences his effectiveness in his current position such as per- | LETTER
[591]formance of specific duties, productivity, conduct an joe cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and
[593]“RATING
[595]particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee’s overall performance during the rating period,
[596]place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.
[598]F .
[599]TOSM 45 OBSOLETE PREVIOUS EDITIONS.
[601]13-00000
[603]ae (When Filled In)
[604]NARRATIVE COMMENTS
[606]Indicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proper perspective their relationship to
[607]overall performance, State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Give recommendations for training. Comment
[608]on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Section B to provide best
[610]basis for determining future personnel action. Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties must be described, if
[611]seplicsblesbject's strengthS.iie in his ability to analyze a problem quickly
[613]and skillfully, to strip it of unnecessary detail and to render a
[615]decision without waste of motion. He has contributed greatly to the
[617]efficiency of the Branch by eliminating unproductive ventures, counseling
[619]the members and promoting the principles of correct tradecraft. He has
[621]been successful in resolving complicated problems involving control of.
[623]an unruly. group.. He-has. a strong..personality and firm convictions about
[624]the..proper .manner of..carrying. -On... cavert operations. and. voices his
[626]convictions without fear. He is an excellent supérvisor and is respected
[628]by the members of the branch for his forthrightness and his sober
[629]judgment..and.sound advice. His handling of agents and contacts on the
[631]outside both directly .and. indirectly. mixes .to a..proper extent firmness
[633]and friéndliness. In Short he is a distinct asset to the clandestine Shee
[634]services both administratively and operationally... ; fess
[636]“CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS — —
[637]BY EMPLOYEE
[639]| CERTIFY THAT | HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT _
[640]. SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE
[641]19 JAN 63 /s/ Walter D,.NENBY (signed on Field Transmittal)
[642]- BY SUPERVISOR
[644]MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN \F THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATI
[645]UNDER MY SUPERVISION 7s Qn
[647]10 months —
[649]DATE . OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR TY Ry PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE .
[650]. So — 5 Robert K, TROUCHARD ©
[652]Pie sm es | Chief/PW — JMWAVE (signed: on Field Transmittal).
[654]13. j BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL oe
[656]COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL Subject is an unusually competent of icer in the
[658]field of covert action operations in that‘he blends a flair for this ~:
[660]activity with sound tradecraft principles and a firm-adherence to valid
[662]reporting techniques, Subject is dedicated and hard working and he has
[664]proven by performance that he is willing to work long hours: in order to.
[666]accomplish his operational objectives. Subject's overall performance
[668]warrants an evaluation of ‘jstron ng}' 94 Subject has growth. potential. both as.
[669]«jan intelligence officer and as a~first. echelon supervisor of. individuals
[670]doing a basic intelligence task. Subject's activities come to the
[671]attention of the reviewing officer on a ‘weekly basis. cons
[673]“| OFFICIAL TITLE OF aEviewiNG OFFICIAL vane OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE
[674]rn 5
[675]Chief of Station 7 TMWAVE (ctened on on Field Transmittal)
[677]RET
[678]7 pe