[3]104-10215-10146)
[5]i ee
[7][2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992
[9]TEAM/GROUP: PBRUMEN II
[11]Eee encore gaa teins? ATOR IE
[13]BOSAL RM aN see ate Met a
[16]8-E-C-R-E-T rs
[18]TRAINING REPORT
[20]| . Qa duly - 134 1
[21](_211 hours, full-time) : . ~ (Date
[23]Student: FRANK
[25]Rebie G
[27]COURSE OBJECTIVE AND CONTENT
[29]_ . Tais course is designed to train indigenous personnel in paramilitary
[30]resistance activities and intelligence collection operetions in denied
[31]areas. Approximately 70% of the student's time is devoted to practical
[32]work and field exercises and 30% to the theoretical aspects essential for -
[33]@ logical understanding and application of training covered during the
[35]course,
[37]U = Unsatisfactory
[38]We Weak
[40]A - Adequate
[42]’  P = Proficient
[44]0 = Outstanding
[46]* Modification of the Office of Training standard rating scale at the
[47]specific request of JMHAVE. : oe .
[49]PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
[51]Performance is'so low in relation to requirements
[52]of the work as to be unequivocally below minimm
[53]standards, ; o
[55]Achieved minimum standards, but less then adequate
[56](in terms of indigenous personnel perticipating in
[57]the program), ; ce
[59]Has achieved the basic level required. Satisfactory,
[60]characterized neither by deficiency nor excellence,
[62]More than satisfactory, Has acquired a solid
[63]beginner's proficiency. Thiag rating may be . .
[64]interpreted as representing "average" on our rating
[65]scale,
[67]Exceptional proficiency, characterized by thorough-.
[68]ness, initiative, originality, and an exceptional
[69]student understending and application of paramilitary
[70]resistance activities.
[72]Performance is so exceptional in relation to require-
[73]ments of the work and in comparison to the performance
[74]of other students doing similar work as to warrant
[75]special recognition. Oo .
[79]TUT NBECEEN, Manta hE ad
[81]et gereeete ete eon
[83]4
[87]i
[88]co)
[89]t
[92]14-0000
[94]15.
[96]26,
[98]PUSH Dg pecan er EF EE
[100]FOUL
[104]MAP READING (ABILITY TO REPORT LOCATIONS
[105]USING GRID COORDINATES)
[107]NAUTICAL CHARTS
[108]WEAPONRY (U.S, & FOREIGN)
[110]CLANDESTINE MOVEMENT.
[112]RESISTANCE ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS
[114]_ AMBUSH TACTICS AND OPERATIONS os
[116]RAID TACTICS AND OPERATIONS
[117]CACHING
[119]CLANDESTINE MOVEMENT LINES (E&E)
[120]OBSERVATION AND. SEPORTING TECHNIQUES
[121]LEADERSHIP TRAITS AND CAPABLLITY
[122]OPERATIONAL PLANNING ABILITY
[123]SKETCHING
[125]SABOTAGE (SEE ATTACHED STB REPORT)
[126]TARGET PHOTOGRAPHY
[128]AIR RECEPTION ACTIVITIES ©
[130]WEAPONS QUALIFICATION
[131](TEST RESULTS ATTACHED) -
[133]motivation and Limitations,
[135]2
[137]S-E-C-R-E-T
[139]Pea Se AEER NRA SEE Se
[142]CREOLE ee MA tai aamame 4 mayan mer pe wine eA “L :
[144]am
[146]t
[148]Pistol
[150]SMG
[152]OVERALL PERFORMANCE
[154]PRANK
[156]KOURS RATING
[157]12 P
[158]8 P
[159]31 Pp
[160]20 P
[161]ok s
[162]2h P
[163]20 P
[164]ho s
[165]See Conments
[166]See Comments
[167]22
[168]20 P
[169]Non-Applicable
[171]shooter
[172]RATING LETTER
[174]Rating takes into account trainee's effectiveness, such as performance
[175]in operational. skills, tactics, techniques, leadership, planning, teamwork,
[177]Trae tce meeting OURO Ai
[179]aaa BENE ERLE DT CE :
[182]14.90000 . . . . . ., _ . ~ “rot
[186]5-E-C-R-E-T
[188]Nie AE oe itt,
[190]The ratings above, and narrative ccmments hereunder, are derived from a
[191]- synthesis of all evaluations submitted on each respective trainee by the
[192]instructor staff,
[194]Overall performance ratings of ».1 students in this class were as follows:
[195]WEAK 0 _ ADEQUATE 0 “PROFICIENT 6 STRONG O  OUISTANDING oO
[197]NARRATIVE COMMENTS
[199]Over-all, FRANK was the most conscientious and hardest vorking
[200]student in his cless, His serious attitude and fine performance warranted
[201]e highly proficient rating.
[203]1
[204]Lae serene es cnemenem sateen enema neem sett mee Ener? et
[206]In preparation of plans, completion of vritten exercises, and
[207]execution of field problems, he demonstrated a high level of achievement.
[209]. During the Ambush Exercise, FRANK had a leadership role. during
[210]“which he adhered to a detailed plan, exerted good control over the tean,
[211]_ and produced a very successful exbush operation.
[213]FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING: |
[214]~ BREPARED BY: - APROVED NO FORWARDED:
[216]© dieses tl flan
[218]ne ee _ Project Officer
[220]Chief ae
[222]3
[223]' B-E-C-R-E-T
[225]_ SRDS RATES NRO ALR IE SS ra aoa an rec ar ee ma ane rs
[228]14.90000
[230]ae aS Sarre oy
[232]sistently aF . ted himeelf to all
[233]8reat diligence, However, hig
[234]Sreat deal of time to perform
[236]-aining with equal and
[237]Practical work, which took him a
[239]little sloppy. - When