tech services louise ok arrangement without dotted line reporting relationship members ena tech services group wholesale group otherwise role somewhat superfluous cloudy best still achieve result brian working together brian louise kitchen 03 15 2001 09 55 brian redmond hou ect ect cc subject tech services point dotted line like joe deffner dotted line andy fastow see getting worried dotted line notice one alternative mentioned leaving today reporting managing relationship brian think louise brian redmond 03 14 2001 09 16 pm louise kitchen hou ect ect cc subject tech services louise brief chat mark regarding plans enron wholesale tech services understand sees ena tech services group reporting brian stanley dotted line basis order keep groups coordinated may want first discuss sell reporting relationship origination units fear another ee cc sell organizational structure members ena tech services group concerned may loose top engineers resist organizationally tied eas two possible alternative arrangements 1 ena tech services group remains ena development engineering organization regionalized report solid line origination groups keep ena tech services group lean mean somewhat independent wholesale tech services group bob virgo mike coleman would report presto durhan b wayne mayes team would report calger c mike coleman would report max would help support esa nick cocavessis would support gas liquids businesses e ron blackham would support enron south america brian stanley group would seen technical resource base draw friendly check technical assumptions used pro formas brian stanley group would provide review enron america dash keep ena tech services group becoming aggressive assumptions whereas brian group tend conservative role risk manager 2 another alternative create broader role commercial investment asset management group dick spoke unit would combine skill sets restructuring group tech services group would technical responsibility ena transactions throughout life cycle would commercial responsibility investments assets longer strategic ongoing financial value origination groups specifically investments assets projected earn cost capital b investments assets little strategic value c troubled assets positions investment required significant time attention beyond origination groups willing spend suggestion 1 group would use brian stanley organization resource base draw needed basis however would formal reporting relationship lets discuss brian