mark martinec xcqiqngmyhhycsgvcceaschallengecc tuesday october 9 2007 201936 loren wilton wrote looks like misfeature think would agree may misfeature case specific header general though may consider case two separate subject headers often completely different subjects time quite decent spam sign havent checked recently see still wasnt suggesting discarding repeated header fields rule like test older virus storm header l_lanieca_s1 subject girlslovescreensaver could tried individually subject header field body instead field bodies concatenated without noticable performance degradation goes rule easily circumvented adding second subject line would match easy forget putting flag rules incident made aware problem tried detect mail coming particular x line misteriously failed every realized fails two lines header case pure security incident wont go details justin mason wrote yeah longstanding surprising behaviour probably documented conf manpage somewhere think changed 330 change well documented would think change would fix rules unknowingly broken rules would possibly affected undesirable way mark wed 06 aug 2008 062906 0200 header lines folded one