adam goryachev mailinglistswebsitemanagerscomau original message razorusersadminexamplesourceforgenet mailtorazorusersadminlistssourceforgeneton behalf craig rhughes thursday august 8 2002 0228 pm vipul ved prakash wrote im sure understand lets say honest razorsubmitter submit lots stuff everyone agrees spam great nice get optin mail looks like spam hit spam trust rating plummets good opinion spam unreliable therefore dont want trust imho exactly case trust system supposed sort people incorrectly submit nonspam bulk mail razor assuming people recognized fact something theyd requested picture happens lots people system lots people unreliable therefore minimal trust people decent reliability therefore trust level help us might problem dont think know yet probably take little enough data trust system equilibriate initialized based submissionsrevocations gathered switched suppose well know equilibriated certainly right people dont think spamnet working well working great week ago imho due number messages sending way discussing tes considering know nothing certainly looks like simply trying throw doubtnegativity onto razor personally havent used razor months want integrate qmailscanner without spam assassin havent time even cant comment razor vipul co think would great transparency whole server process ie know problem tell us avoid stupid oh isnt working took 324 days work etc 1 worth regards adam sfnet email sponsored bythinkgeek welcome geek heaven httpthinkgeekcomsf _______________________________________________ razorusers mailing list razoruserslistssourceforgenet httpslistssourceforgenetlistslistinforazorusers fri 9 aug 2002 100529 1000 razorusers whats wrong razor servers