theo van dinter mqlwfkfoapacheorg wed feb 20 2008 065214pm 0000 nigel frankcom wrote anyway heard talking uribl understod quite different service blacklists domains rather ips maybe dangerous practice fight spam anyway anyone suggest use uribl uri black lists around several years generally helpful detecting spam uribl one standard black lists use sa others surbl oldest well known imo well razor also message hashing largely uses domain detection days may forgetting someone else sorry ones come mind results past 60 days different groups want spam lowest ham aka higher better overall spam ham rank score name 0 769001 57013 0931 000 000 messages 000000 930978 69022 0931 000 000 messages 65312 701541 00053 1000 100 000 uribl_jp_surbl 54979 590545 00018 1000 099 000 uribl_sc_surbl 33513 359976 00018 1000 098 000 uribl_ab_surbl 58407 627323 00667 0999 094 000 uribl_ob_surbl 43120 463111 00737 0998 093 000 uribl_ws_surbl 1385 14874 00035 0998 087 000 uribl_ph_surbl 0758 08091 00702 0920 078 000 uribl_red 71920 771604 12331 0984 071 000 uribl_black 1545 14891 23047 0393 052 000 uribl_grey 69598 747537 00614 0999 095 000 razor2_cf_range_e8_51_100 uribl bit problematic others due high ham hit rate given sas method using multiple data sources determine hamspam false positive issue minimized randomly selected tagline im looking linux equivilant pc magazine brian dudek unfortunately isnt available linuxcentric magazines tend actually contain useful information chris saunderson thu 07 aug 2008 061835 0500 uribl