stephen williams wvilignet dont understand position guilty infringing patent whether done recreational patent reading copyright trade secrets different cant infringing unless access wrote poem could prove couldnt seen guys would separate independent copyrights different works patents infringement simply requires patent valid patenter filed first idea otherwise filed public also trumps someone using thought publicized filed protection ie trade secret one reason frequently choke consulting similar contracts extend warranty noninfringement makes sense copyright trade secret patents crazy aol others change consulting agreement years ago sdw gordon mohr wrote havent read patent many wise legal engineering minds counseled recreational patent reading bad idea practicing technologist sdw gcezqroonhpticom httpwwwhpticom per wvilignet httpsdwst stephen williams 7033719362c 7039950407fax 20147 aim sdw tue 05 aug 2008 234901 0400 fork google evil