trading v origination offices agree exception point 3 plan one several authorisers bills case however authorisers also spoke sally agency office agrees short term agency plan need implement however mentioned ted sally need discuss ultimate goal offices continue exist let call plan implement phase best regards richard sage lon ect ect cc sally beck hou ect ect brent price hou ect ect fernley dyson lon ect ect mike jordan lon ect ect shona wilson na enron enron ted murphy hou ect ect naomi connell lon ect ect subject trading v origination offices thanks think good start far roles go outlined shona last week apply basic rules process forgive obvious example rule 1 confirmations issued chased matched remote offices done centrally customers remote office given contact numbers e g fax operations hub way incoming confirmations etc go independent ops group rule 2 cash payments receipts respect transactions approved reconciled remote offices operations hubs reconcile cash movements changes position rule 3 physical settlements receipts respect transactions approved reconciled remote offices splits logistics process somewhat essentially cash every movement physical product approved necessary reconciled movements position operations hubs initiation optimisation aspect logistics could remain remote since arguably involves pseudo trading exhaustive helpful hope dp richard sage ect 08 21 2000 03 40 sally beck hou ect ect brent price hou ect ect cc fernley dyson lon ect ect mike jordan lon ect ect shona wilson na enron enron ted murphy hou ect ect david port market risk corp enron enron naomi connell lon ect ect subject trading v origination offices sally brent three mg offices north america outside new york previous acquisition enron acted much trading offices shona naomi worked people new york put place extra controls trading offices example trader new york london book sign profit daily process highlighted fact non trading offices reasonably offices organise logistics things happen ground originate execute trading offices suggestion make division explicit cc bought approach require comfortable put causey buy worth noting approach would caught helsinki except contract bottom drawer system control reliably catch evidenced eott thanks richard