var metals preference aggregated var methodology metals business soon possible version la want poison progress opiniion think critical first step find way aggregate positions coarse buckets perhaps sacrificing precision speed based rules oerations deliver research stand behind commercial accept using equally coarse var calculation equivalent ad hoc var delivered official books records daily basis believe would acceptable 2 3 month time frame time get versionlb opposed waiting 2 3 months implement better process nothing interim ultimately would look version 2 delivered defendable 1 1 01 require indulgence compromise fronts conceive better way please let know consistent understanding critical point perspective mg commercial team metal operations staff understand role making happen willingness accept consequences look take lead leader integration need input rest us underscore importance please let us know alluded phone people houston involved var process extraordinary period detailed scrutiny var commercial hindered lack basic understanding parties responsibilities given distance newness metals personell fear could set us surprises uncomfortable communication much entirely necessary thanks ted eric gadd 07 21 2000 11 46 ted murphy hou ect ect bjorn hagelmann hou ect ect cc richard sage lon ect ect subject attached fax ted bjorn plan release draft recommendations metal position limits close business 24 july asked vince prepare v r computational methodology prior 7 8 aug bod meeting