bitbitchmagnesiumnet httpwwwpostgazettecomcolumnists20020905brian5asp gab thought nekkid url going gab infringement 1st amendment rights broadcasters gab proposed campaign finanice restrictions preventing gab making money advertisements deemed gab thinly veiled campaign contributions arbitrary gab government board posted discussion gab thought thered gab instead postgazette column brian oneill gab lamenting fact people know gab fill permit take advantage gab right peaceable assembly obviously gab hes poking fun idea specific groups gab get specific zones gab police decide messages signs get put gab zones expediently keep order oh thats right greg explicitly clear probush folks went permit dance article lets get something straight first amendment issue public streets provided one isnt blocking traffic generally tend sorta ok least last interpretation con law years ago ill feign ignorance wrt fact laws may changed specific facts case weak guy _was_ merely holding sign seems case probush folks nothing wrong certainly didnt enough wrong warrant disorderly conduct charge ill play perspective though lets assume things walk city office tell want peacably assemble bush think theyll give permit probably lie cop happened scenario walks checks permit finds falsified statement get said document arrests end story gab problem politics gotten muddied gab nowadays shouting unpeaceably disrupting gab political rallies dont agree become gab common practice courts constantly ruled gab restrictions first amendment gab teach first year law school ill agree owen one muddied ass hard chose republocrat demipublican shouting grown become answer government span years help courts limited rights citizens first amendment question policy terrorism drugs iraq bush general youre aiding terrorism challenge beliefs folks attending various shadowy g8 conferences youre anarchist youre herded designated protest spot miles away anything part point speech heard scream soapbox forest somewhere thats speech effective speech people screaming shouting political figures heard way gab think given information laid story gab mr oneill confused free speech action free gab speech even protected speech practiced almost gab every american seems involve ability communicate gab idea unknown audience action involves directing gab specific comment specific welldefined individual audience gab immediate harmful sometimes physical gab effects easily forseeable reasonable person getting back original point communicate idea unknown audience youre miles audience bypass rules miles away audience without violating rules regime dont think mr nell throwing pies bush sign last time checked didnt cause physical injury even emotional harm remember cohen v california 403 us 15 1971 individual speaking requirement desist individual listening option leave 02 still considered legal best regards bitbitch mailtobitbitchmagnesiumnet mon 30 sep 2002 110821 0400 re2 moment silence first amendment fwd