thomson martin martinthomsonandrewcom hi hannes julian course makes obvious new uri scheme totally pointless recently updated examples lower one upper one martin thomson might provide background issue since also told update drafts interesting looking forward understand reasons martin provide bit background im impartial topic uri schemes uri scheme added request iesg review concerns loss contextual information relating uri used contexts outside context devicelis exchange assuming uri necessary reason go full uri request line ensure server able distinguish helds uri matching https uri without server potentially know difference without absolute uri possibility held http uris could considered equivalent fact would meaningful difference comes protocol exchange rightly pointed ill note isnt difference important certainly wasnt factor discussions lead introduction new scheme using absolute uri common practice http anything requests proxies however rfc 2616 requires servers understand support absolute uris sec 512 experience safe thing assume http servers generally treat uri sensibly cheers martin message designated recipient may contain privileged proprietary otherwise private information received error please notify sender immediately delete original unauthorized use email prohibited mf2 _______________________________________________ ietf mailing list ietfietforg httpswwwietforgmailmanlistinfoietf wed 06 aug 2008 123310 0400 past lc comments draftietfgeoprivhttplocationdelivery08