fw netco benefit rate projections urgh original message donnelly john l hr mailto john l donnelly ssmb com sent monday january 07 2002 10 38 oxley david subject netco benefit rate projections asked benfits folks work better comparisons however like make exceptions benefits people across street houston etc like keep benefits across citigroup pay cash equity delta business groups original message oxley david mailto david oxley enron com sent monday january 07 2002 10 15 donnelly john l hr cc cash michelle davies neil rahaim christian kitchen louise subject fw netco benefit rate projections john look comparisons convinced agree interim subsidy let folks gently salary adjustment think lose high number people transaction make accommodation call later today discuss also need touch base salary comment need clarify mean salary freeze understood ok us promoting people 50 next 4 6 weeks long run list passed first regard would expect adjust salaries traditionally raised commercial support salaries vp line cola based performance typically around 3 4 5 payroll january certainly expectations deal regards david original message jarrett anthony sent monday january 07 2002 8 22 davies neil slone jeanie cc oxley david rahaim christian fitzpatrick amy cash michelle subject netco benefit rate projections attached excel workbook containing benefits projections 2002 first tab contains enron rates including flex dollars 2 nd tab citigroup rates conservative estimate 3 rd tab citigroup rates maxing life ad jarrett anthony cc davies neil cash michelle subject fw netco benefits comparison sent back reply saying minimum see hardship less 100 k base people want raise salaries 3 5 david original message donnelly john l hr mailto john l donnelly ssmb com sent friday january 04 2002 4 48 pm oxley david subject netco benefits comparison issue every deal benefit coverage good overall employees pay coverage income based mitigates impact lower paid find higher paid focus total comp benefits benefits one thing keep citigroup want anything subsidy anything else happy discuss futher market overall comp ben philosphy deal benefits original message oxley david mailto david oxley enron com sent friday january 04 2002 2 46 pm donnelly john l hr cc cash michelle rahaim christian subject fw netco benefits comparison john worried comparison benefits costs perhaps could review let know agree problem recommendation consider subsidy payrise people may otherwise suffer hardship meeting additional costs medical dental premiums david original message jarrett anthony sent friday january 04 2002 1 35 pm oxley david cc davies neil slone jeanie fitzpatrick amy rahaim christian subject netco benefits comparison correct costs meeting afternoon today able spreadsheet monday showing different scenarios netco employees paychecks would affected paying benefits based salary range coverage tier employee employee spouse employee slone jeanie fitzpatrick amy rahaim christian subject netco benefits comparison tony sure read correctly seems medical costs significantly higher citi groups arrangements asked neil jeanie work illustrate may need get subsidise first 12 months difference prove hardship original message jarrett anthony sent wednesday january 02 2002 5 45 pm oxley david davies neil slone jeanie fitzpatrick amy wheeler terrie schultea kathryn rahaim christian oquinn kari clyatt julie philpott charles cc joyce mary barrow cynthia jones robert w hr exec cash michelle subject netco benefits comparison david initial draft current benefit plans compared ssmb plans main difference employee ssmb pay benefits pocket instead flexdollars cover portion cost thanks tony e mail property enron corp relevant affiliate may contain confidential privileged material sole use intended recipient review use distribution disclosure others strictly prohibited intended recipient authorized receive recipient please contact sender reply enron corp enron messaging administration enron com delete copies message e mail attachments hereto intended offer acceptance create evidence binding enforceable contract enron corp affiliates intended recipient party may relied anyone basis contract estoppel otherwise thank