aaron kulkis cmiqlkx91hotpopcom mike mcmullin wrote sat 20080216 2230 0100 herbert graeber wrote samstag 16 februar 2008 221911 schrieb jerry houston years defragging hard drives part routine system maintenance windows systems occurred ive linux systems running long enough might good idea defragment drives make sure everything running smoothly possible common linux file systems neccessary defragment filled 90 95 care always free disk space havent able find information drive defragmentation linux file systems searching defrag software installer turned results called something else linux land tool dedicated want defragment inplace ahs one tool every file system type want offline copy file file one partition another using runlevel 1 neccessary defragmentation possible linux file systems needed occasionally windows systems even windows using ntfs defragmentation isnt neccessary fill disk much tools defragmentation exist people fmilar windows 9598 fat file system ask tools willing spend money im sure last place worked bad disk slowdown due heavily fragmented files according departments msce guru normal several multimeg files open time randomly terms order opened working really would nice know one way recent experience admin duties xp machines baghdad defragging took several hours ntfs partitions 40g 60g range udcatmailabuseorg sun feb 24 103010 2008 message 11 date tue 12 feb 2008 110842 0800 douglas otis subject ietfdkim unacceptable issue ssp02 discardable inappropriately specifies possible verifier action steve atkins cc dkim list messageid 56fa2f4ca4a442dba1f3798f3babf9a3mailabuseorg contenttype textplain charsetusascii formatflowed delspyes feb 12 2008 857 steve atkins wrote feb 12 2008 825 frank ellermann wrote term mail 46 occurences rfc 4408 imo suspicious better discardable 2821bis terms discard drop adding tons caveats without noting nontechnical facts eg dropping mail violate constitution base law live level ordinary crimes personally really must invent new term instead sticking suspicious simply fail authheaders using unacceptable clearly indicates receivers already dropped ball accepted unaccptable mail doesnt match semantics ssp discardable match semantics ssp issue dont like semantics ssp implies youd prefer circumspect describing theyd valid concerns theyre quite different ssp assertion defined terms verifier actions defining action premature case term discardable likely result often inappropriate actions ssp could use term noncompliant assertion sole legitimate signer actions remain within discretion verifier state assertion judged compliance domains assertions discardable match semantic permit assessment compliance tue 05 aug 2008 084813 0500 opensuse defragging possible necessary