text_combined: arthur dent boxcdjtroodosdemoncouk tue feb 12 2008 093347am 0500 matt kettler wrote arthur dent wrote hello please forgive ignorance dont fully understand bayes works dutifully feed spam ham get salearn generally bayes works pretty well little concerned however moment seem getting bombarded russian spam currently outweighs spam 1001 worry bayes eventually come believe russian spam really spam current trend continues overwhelm spam bayes db wont happen unless theres massive flood unique tokens words flush tokens bayes db kind worrying didnt know unique tokens thought sheer volume russian spam would push stuff bombardment highly unlikely 100000 unique russian words going enter bayes database would take default bayes_expiry_max_db_size odds bombardment mostly 1000 words thats going raise spam count tokens wont impact spam email thanks clarifying thats reassuring really realistic risk sa may learn russian language email spam unless actually get russian language nonspam ie bayes contain russian words ones strong spam scores dont speak russian thats probably significant problem da worrying unnecessarily make efforts balance spam feeding bayes would generally advise trying balance bayes philosophy likely lead selfpoisoning realistic benefit id try balance ways actually make things closer real spam feed helpful response really appreciate input made clearer original mail almost fact think type spam caught much even gets sa procmail recipe concern stems fact thinking devnulling spams happy fps procmail recipe would sudden absence russian spam leave normal spam less heavily weighted guess said shouldnt problem case bayes soon put right time wouldnt thanks help others commented thread list mark wed 06 aug 2008 030908 0000 bayes balance spam