text_combined: pete connolly thbgbsfyrxvibtinternetcom ken schneider wrote gerald pfeifer pecked keyboard wrote fri 22 feb 2008 per jessen wrote really blunt telling us reason thought pretty blunt interesting see favor jfs terms customer requests recall single one jfs single complaint deprecated jfs sles 10 jfs doesnt really meet needs handled file systems distro future belongs clustered file systems anyway thats actually focusing clustering much use single drive home system cant think one instance would beneficial good point ken something separated desktop vs server installation option installation ideas desktop installations knowing workload types servers advanced install greater choice file system types exposed might better taking sensible choices end user desktop installation good thing something weve started already home partition suggested separate partition maybe extension would suggest preferred fs type profile machine installed qa testing jfs partners far tell unlike file systems regularily undergo massive testing run problem ext3reiserfsxfs easily quickly addressed opensuse kernel maintainers jfs wouldnt know user first might strong argument though comes data mainstream usually good idea last two find pretty convincing gerald honest someone choosing use jfs fs recommended use alternate type installation either doesnt need help else needs help provided two use cases could probably class youre cheers pete thu 07 aug 2008 204837 0000 opensuse opensusefactory 110 default filesystems