text_combined: kevin w gagel vjuhbcncbcca original message quotes thread nolisting site posted response michael scheidell use bogus mx lowest priority bowie bailey would say risky put nonsmtp host primary mx cant disagree nonsmtp host strange nonstandard bogus lowest mx record points nonexisting host something consider ive seen recomended considering last year rbl rejections increasing durring month november last year replaced gateway server required change mx records point number rejects dropped dramatically even february number stable low rise yet see direct benifit false mx record point spambots nothing fact recomendation read fake mx record real one rfc compliant servers try lowest move next highest till send message spambots typically try highest leave cant deliver right one mx record fact rbl rejections dropped much gives support lost email havent complaint yet real senders using real servers rfc compliant seems like every discussion leads group saying lose mail group saying lose mail way resolve hard see either side would misrepresent truth obviously someone wrong one thing notice certainly could wrong proponents seem actually using nolisting claiming problems whilst idea seem predicting problems rather reporting actual issues experienced youll always supporters detractors thats life really important thing figure conditions acceptable site go configure site work email streams vary site want site varies well educational institute give leniancy educationaly related emails lumber mill hand may careneed want messages diplomas etc job figure someone opposed favour particular method see would reason site judge method good bad users kevin w gagel network administrator information technology services 250 5622131 local 5448 blog httpmailcncbccablogsgagel file share httpmailcncbccausersgagel college new caledonia visit us httpwwwcncbcca virus scanning done incoming outgoing email antispam information cnc found httpgatewaycncbcca thu 07 aug 2008 025123 0800 ot bogus mx opinions