text_combined: 3 396 chomsky citations agree mark durie less curious chomsky cited much others cited little least linguists example two important issues multilinear phonology one fairly recent around since 70 manyto one mapping tones vowels prosodic licensing notion elements one linguistic level must belong units higher level usually next level notions explicit principles tagmemic phonology first cf last two paragraphs pike pike 1947 read first line introduction goldsmith 1976 phd thesis interesting contrast second principle cf pike 1967 discussion phonemic hierarchy one rarely sees pike quoted regard e selkirk long exception pattern though geoff pullum nllt column citation etiquette linguistics takes general problem partially understandable since lot tagmemics insights take unappealing form disjoint set adhoc commentaries last language pike looked nevertheless way deny pike responsible brilliant insights human language pike one example plenty others anyone needs chomsky make work respectable clearly false whether individual saussure student still anyone seriously doubt chomsky saussure bloomfield sapir even jakobson put linguistics map intellectual disciplines done keep anyone else need psychiatric help moreover fact chomsky publishes linguist wrong please correct would interesting nt hurt citation index output nearly asimovian influence field seen even level university administration department chairperson wants convince university administrator linguistics natural intellectual ties many departments think would drop names saussure pike rather chomsky worth considering possibility many citations chomsky work could due ignorance said even think cite nobody argue look original source hard work laziness often prevails also true like source many interesting ideas history human language came 20d219 mit