text_combined: russell mcormond russellfloraca hendrik wrote hi please give advice kind recognised recognisable license licence hereafter always implied use situation described enclosed statement exact match license know comes closest saw replies im convinced understand trying 1 grant readers listeners viewers something created right copy redistribute excerpt modify edit parody otherwise use full part without adding additional content insert choice creative idea method musical score poem story music recording picture video recording way see fit including purpose making money without required mention creator said exception choose mention creator said must mention ive seen many liberal licenses grant permission everything attribute author work special case saying dont attribute arent allowed attribute something else something ive never seen may want go general case avoid use custom license creative commons attribution license would great many types works new bsdstyle license great software possible articulating wouldnt want oldstyle bsd license annoying advertising clause mandating attributed situations far beyond properly listed source code httpwwwgnuorgphilosophybsdhtml details httpwwwfsforglicensinglicensesindex_htmlmodifiedbsd httpwwwfsforglicensinglicensesindex_htmloriginalbsd offending clause 3 advertising materials mentioning features use software must display following acknowledgement product includes software developed university california berkeley contributors meaning 2 retain exactly rights said grant others 1 also retain right publicize fact creator given person entity making use said chosen mention copyright holder dont need offer permission anything copyright list activities require permission payment circumstances people types things worried wanted clarify clause never need permission distributoruser work say work 3 readers listeners viewers grant license regards derivative work created include otherwise make use parts work licenses licences may less restrictive license must case contradict 2 needs clarification saying cant restrict access work talking drm restrictions ie encrypt work cant access without permission saying cant restrict anything want derivative different ive seen copyleft style reciprocal licenses say people need use license derivatives ive seen boilerplate licenses say open license applies author original work think gets complicated people understand meaning far easier simply go reciprocalcopyleft worry type scenario many people promote liberal licenses believe get bees honey vinegar suggesting using liberal license may encourage people use similar liberal licenses strong copyleft restrictions may different opinion opinion quite common one problems trying go custom license especially one written without help lawyer unclear people reading offered us 3 clauses wanted offer dont think adequately understood asking 3 clauses received work clauses rather offending intentions author would likely use work russell mcormond internet consultant please help us tell canadian parliament protect property rights owners information technology sign petition httpwwwdigitalcopyrightcapetitionict government lobbied legacy copyright holders hardware manufacturers pry camcorder computer home theatre portable media player cold dead hands _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discusslistdigitalcopyrightca httplistdigitalcopyrightcamailmanlistinfodiscuss thu 07 aug 2008 123849 0400 ddcc please tell call