text_combined: accounting transaction done bridgeline sorry late replying would seem mtm issue bridgeline decision would solely based whether fact trading defined eitf 98 10 4 pages criteria set forth document may question want ask trevor mihalik know initially meet 98 10 criteria business may well changed confused suggestion whether involve commercial may understand already means track 40 certainly mark 60 business bridgeline 40 treated affiliate business wes brent price 05 23 2000 06 07 wes colwell hou ect ect cc steve jackson hou ect ect subject accounting transaction done bridgeline wes still anticipating bridgeline allowed mark market status point future criteria must bridgeline meet expected timeline going happen soon would suggest avoid getting commercial involved developing process track 40 portion bridgeline forwarded brent price hou ect 05 23 2000 05 57 steve jackson 05 19 2000 12 29 pm brent price hou ect ect cc subject accounting transaction done bridgeline fyi forwarded steve jackson hou ect 05 19 2000 12 28 pm georgeanne hodges 05 01 2000 04 11 pm steve jackson hou ect ect cc wes colwell hou ect ect mary lynne ruffer hou ect ect subject accounting transaction done bridgeline steve aa indicated proposal regard transactions done ena bridgeline sounds ok bring good point 40 would shown purposes position loss limits scenario using schedule c defer 40 would effectively showing 100 measures told would monitor materiality putting manual process place think meet commercial folks explain real p l impact would take lead deciding get meeting set thanks