(D) Progression through the specialized docket based upon the participant’s performance in the treatment plan and compliance with requirements of the specialized docket phases. A participant’s progress through the specialized docket phases is not to be based solely upon preset timelines. (E) Explanation to the participant of responses to compliance and noncompliance, including criteria for termination. Recommended Practices (A) Appearance at single court session Having a significant number of specialized docket participants appear at a single court session gives the opportunity to educate the participant as to the benefits of court compliance and consequences for noncompliance. (B) Sharing of decision making and conflict resolution Mechanisms for sharing decision making and resolving conflicts among treatment team members should be established, emphasizing professional integrity, confidentiality, and accountability. Standard 7. Status Review Hearings. (A) Ongoing judicial interaction A specialized docket incorporate ongoing judicial interaction with each participant as an essential component of the docket. (B) Appearance before specialized docket judge (1) At a minimum, a specialized docket participant shall appear before the specialized docket judge at least twice monthly during the initial phase of the specialized docket. (2) Thereafter, a specialized docket participant shall regularly appear before the specialized docket judge to review the participant’s progress through the specialized docket. Recommended Practices
(D) Progression through the specialized docket based upon the participant’s performance in the treatment plan and compliance with requirements of the specialized docket phases. A participant’s progress through the specialized docket phases is not to be based solely upon preset timelines. (E) Explanation to the participant of responses to compliance and noncompliance, including criteria for termination. Recommended Practices (A) Appearance at single court session Having a significant number of specialized docket participants appear at a single court session gives the opportunity to educate the participant as to the benefits of court compliance and consequences for noncompliance. (B) Sharing of decision making and conflict resolution Mechanisms for sharing decision making and resolving conflicts among treatment team members should be established, emphasizing professional integrity, confidentiality, and accountability. Standard 7. Status Review Hearings. (A) Ongoing judicial interaction A specialized docket incorporate ongoing judicial interaction with each participant as an essential component of the docket. (B) Appearance before specialized docket judge (1) At a minimum, a specialized docket participant shall appear before the specialized docket judge at least twice monthly during the initial phase of the specialized docket. (2) Thereafter, a specialized docket participant shall regularly appear before the specialized docket judge to review the participant’s progress through the specialized docket. Recommended Practices
Amend.%20to%20Sup.R.%2036.02-36.29,%20and%20Appendix%20I%20and%20Terminology%20Rule%20of%20the%20Code%20of%20Judicial%20Conduct(FINAL)(Knopp)(VanNorman).docx