people are historically and in the present. ...engage in Students can GS 3XX Critical book Focus group Spring 2014 The majority Reformulate debates speak review discussion Summer 2014 of students exam questions practice of knowledgably Semester-long with students not to address any GS 4XX democracy about group project One minute effectively ambiguities fundamental Final exam paper compare Include a principles of Written different session on democracy in assignment: models of “Effective Canada. country profile democracy in Work” in the Students can their final weekly topics compare exams features of 45% of democracy in students other countries. struggled Students with solving develop stronger disputes in skills to engage their groups in deliberative dialogue. ...think Students can GS 3XX Term paper Student Fall 2013 The majority Students will critically formulate a Final exam survey Spring 2014 of students be required to about position based Reflective Monitoring were able to submit a 1 GS 4XX theories, on valid journals group formulate page term concepts and premises. Oral discussions propositions, paper proposal arguments in Students can presentation but struggled in order to the field gather and Critical article with linking receive present analysis them back to feedback on supporting the literature their critical evidence to Students engagement argue their case. were able to with existing Students can provide arguments in challenge evidence for the field underlying their own assumptions propositions, held by others. but remained Students can dismissive of reflect on their other conclusions and scholars’ make their own arguments judgment about without
people are historically and in the present. ...engage in debates practice of democracy Students can speak knowledgably about fundamental principles of democracy in Canada. Students can compare features of democracy in other countries. Students develop stronger skills to engage in deliberative dialogue. GS 3XX GS 4XX Critical book review Semester-long group project Final exam Written assignment: country profile Focus group discussion with students One minute paper Spring 2014 Summer 2014 The majority of students not effectively compare different models of democracy in their final exams 45% of students struggled with solving disputes in their groups Reformulate exam questions to address any ambiguities Include a session on “Effective Work” in the weekly topics ...think critically about theories, concepts and arguments in the field Students can formulate a position based on valid premises. Students can gather and present supporting evidence to argue their case. Students can challenge underlying assumptions held by others. Students can reflect on their conclusions and make their own judgment about GS 3XX GS 4XX Term paper Final exam Reflective journals Oral presentation Critical article analysis Student survey Monitoring group discussions Fall 2013 Spring 2014 The majority of students were able to formulate propositions, but struggled with linking them back to the literature Students were able to provide evidence for their own propositions, but remained dismissive of other scholars’ arguments without Students will be required to submit a 1 page term paper proposal in order to receive feedback on their critical engagement with existing arguments in the field
Assessment-Chart-MS-Word-Version-for-DOWNLOAD.docx