ASSESSMENT CRITERIA QUANTITATIVE-BASED WORK – Level 6 Classification % Range Knowledge and Problem Solving Calculations Analysis and Presentation of Understanding Interpretation Work I 80 100 Comprehensive of Very competent in both the identification Techniques are appropriately and Evidence of excellent Excellent, well – knowledge and clear and modelling of more complex problems effectively used demonstrating analysis and interpretation directed presentation, [Outstanding understanding of major and innovation and creativity in of new or abstract data and logically structured Work] complex theories, principles formulating substantially correct in conclusions derived and concepts solutions I 70 79 Comprehensive knowledge Competent in both the identification and Applies appropriate techniques, evidence of analysis Well directed – and clear understanding of modelling of more complex problems and demonstrates innovation and and interpretation of new or presentation, logically [Excellent Work] major and complex theories, creativity in formulating mainly abstract data and in structured principles and concepts correct solutions conclusions derived II (i) 60 69 Substantial knowledge and Able to identify more complex problems Clear demonstration of the steps Evidence of analysis and Clearly presented, – clear understanding of major and competent in the modelling of taken few errors in calculations interpretation of new and logically structured [Good Quality theories, principles and standard problems using recognised methods to seen data in conclusions Work] concepts formulate solution derived II (ii) 50 - 59 Evidence of knowledge and Competent in the use of appropriate Able to demonstrate the steps Reasonable evidence of Neat presentation and clear understanding of a techniques to identify and model taken, errors in calculations, may analysis and interpretation structure [Acceptable range of theories, principles standard problems not always using recognised in evaluating outcomes and Work] and concepts methods to formulate solution making judgements III 40 49 Knowledge and Able to use appropriate techniques to taken in calculations lack Limited use of analytical and Weak presentation – understanding of key identify and model standard problems clarity, calculations have interpretative skills and structure [Adequate Work] theories, principles and numerous errors, recognised concepts limited or methods not used or used inconsistent incorrectly Fail 35 39 Very limited knowledge and Limited ability to use appropriate Steps taken in calculations are Little or no analysis and Poor presentation and – understanding of key techniques to identify and model incomplete or largely incorrect, interpretation structure (marginal) theories, principles and standard problems recognised methods not used or concepts used incorrectly [Limited Work] Fail 0 34 Little or no evidence of Very limited ability to use appropriate Steps taken in calculations are No analysis or interpretation Unacceptable – knowledge and/or techniques to identify and model incomplete and incorrect, presentation, and [Unacceptable understanding of key standard problems recognised methods not used or structure Work] theories, principles and used incorrectly concepts
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA – QUANTITATIVE-BASED WORK Level 6 Classification % Range Knowledge and Understanding Problem Solving Calculations Analysis and Interpretation Presentation of Work I [Outstanding Work] 80 – 100 Comprehensive of knowledge and clear understanding of major and complex theories, principles and concepts Very competent in both the identification and modelling of more complex problems Techniques are appropriately and effectively used demonstrating innovation and creativity in formulating substantially correct solutions Evidence of excellent analysis and interpretation of new or abstract data and in conclusions derived Excellent, well directed presentation, logically structured I [Excellent Work] 70 – 79 Comprehensive knowledge and clear understanding of major and complex theories, principles and concepts Competent in both the identification and modelling of more complex problems Applies appropriate techniques, and demonstrates innovation and creativity in formulating mainly correct solutions evidence of analysis and interpretation of new or abstract data and in conclusions derived Well directed presentation, logically structured II (i) [Good Quality Work] 60 – 69 Substantial knowledge and clear understanding of major theories, principles and concepts Able to identify more complex problems and competent in the modelling of standard problems Clear demonstration of the steps taken few errors in calculations using recognised methods to formulate solution Evidence of analysis and interpretation of new and seen data in conclusions derived Clearly presented, logically structured II (ii) [Acceptable Work] 50 - 59 Evidence of knowledge and clear understanding of a range of theories, principles and concepts Competent in the use of appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Able to demonstrate the steps taken, errors in calculations, may not always using recognised methods to formulate solution Reasonable evidence of analysis and interpretation in evaluating outcomes and making judgements Neat presentation and structure III [Adequate Work] 40 – 49 Knowledge and understanding of key theories, principles and concepts limited or inconsistent Able to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems taken in calculations lack clarity, calculations have numerous errors, recognised methods not used or used incorrectly Limited use of analytical and interpretative skills Weak presentation and structure Fail (marginal) [Limited Work] 35 – 39 Very limited knowledge and understanding of key theories, principles and concepts Limited ability to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Steps taken in calculations are incomplete or largely incorrect, recognised methods not used or used incorrectly Little or no analysis and interpretation Poor presentation and structure Fail [Unacceptable Work] 0 – 34 Little or no evidence of knowledge and/or understanding of key theories, principles and concepts Very limited ability to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Steps taken in calculations are incomplete and incorrect, recognised methods not used or used incorrectly No analysis or interpretation Unacceptable presentation, and structure
Assessment-Criteria.docx