France: Idem [This indicator is under the producer's responsibility] The Netherlands: we prefer one EU validation tool used by each MS the monitoring of this indicator should be based on this Sweden: The same comments as for the question above [The data custodians fill this in when publishing metadata for a dataset or service, as required by the IR for metadata. Current problems are the three options according to the IR whereby the option evaluated” isn’t catered for by the ISO standard used for metadata. There is a “not workaround for this, though] UK: We have not provided this indicator yet as we have not considered conformity of data. We would anticipate we would extract this from discovery metadata. DSi2,1/1/3 - d) Should the indicators DSi2,1/1/3 be included in the dash board? NSi1 - a) How is the NSi1 indicator (Accessibility of metadata through discovery services) collected?
France: Idem [This indicator is under the producer's responsibility] The Netherlands: we prefer one EU validation tool used by each MS the monitoring of this indicator should be based on this Sweden: The same comments as for the question above [The data custodians fill this in when publishing metadata for a dataset or service, as required by the IR for metadata. Current problems are the three options according to the IR whereby the option “not evaluated” isn’t catered for by the ISO standard used for metadata. There is a workaround for this, though] UK: We have not provided this indicator yet as we have not considered conformity of data. We would anticipate we would extract this from discovery metadata. DSi2,1/1/3 - d) Should the indicators DSi2,1/1/3 be included in the dash board? NSi1 - a) How is the NSi1 indicator (Accessibility of metadata through discovery services) collected?
ANNEX_Indicators.docx