KU Undergraduate Research Award (UGRA) Evaluation Rubric-Arts projects Disciplinary Context/Vision 1=Poor or Absent 2=Fair 3 = Good 4 = Exceptional Score Synthesizes other creative Minimal discussion Vague discussion Good discussion of Excellent discussion works in the field and of other creative of other creative other creative works. of other creative characterizes current trends works suggests lack works. Some Adequate depth of works. Impressive in the discipline. of understanding or conventional or insight/analysis. Is able depth of effort. No attempts underdeveloped to describe trends and insight/analysis. at insights or insight or analysis connections that are Makes meaningful analysis. is provided about clearly related to the connections among individual work, proposed work. artists and but no communicates connections are trends that are made. clearly related to proposed work. Student has a firm grasp on relevant concepts. Proposal articulates a Proposal is purely Proposal Proposal articulates a Proposal clearly creative vision for the descriptive and does articulates a creative vision for the articulates a project. not describe the vision for the project. compelling and inspiration or creative project, but it is innovative creative vision for the project. under-developed. vision for the project. Proposal clearly describes the themes, questions, or issues that the work will explore and the potential significance of the final project. Project Design 0=Poor or Absent 1=Fair 2 = Good 3 = Exceptional Score Describes appropriate Methods or Inadequately Student explains the Shows evidence of methods or techniques for approach is not explained or techniques and exceptional insight described. inadequate approach to be used and reflection about
KU Undergraduate Research Award (UGRA) Evaluation Rubric-Arts projects Disciplinary Context/Vision 1=Poor or Absent 2=Fair 3 = Good 4 = Exceptional Score Synthesizes other creative works in the field and characterizes current trends in the discipline. Minimal discussion of other creative works suggests lack of understanding or effort. No attempts at insights or analysis. Vague discussion of other creative works. Some conventional or underdeveloped insight or analysis is provided about individual work, but no connections are made. Good discussion of other creative works. Adequate depth of insight/analysis. Is able to describe trends and connections that are clearly related to the proposed work. Excellent discussion of other creative works. Impressive depth of insight/analysis. Makes meaningful connections among artists and communicates trends that are clearly related to proposed work. Student has a firm grasp on relevant concepts. Proposal articulates a creative vision for the project. Proposal is purely descriptive and does not describe the inspiration or creative vision for the project. Proposal articulates a vision for the project, but it is under-developed. Proposal articulates a creative vision for the project. Proposal clearly articulates a compelling and innovative creative vision for the project. Proposal clearly describes the themes, questions, or issues that the work will explore and the potential significance of the final project. Project Design 0=Poor or Absent 1=Fair 2 = Good 3 = Exceptional Score Describes appropriate methods or techniques for Methods or approach is not described. Inadequately explained or inadequate Student explains the techniques and approach to be used Shows evidence of exceptional insight and reflection about
Arts--UGRA%20Rubric%20for%20reviewers-FA18.docx