compliments in compliments in Source: Home the last 5 the last 5 years Managers Mark=0 Mark=5 Vulnerable Adult An average of 3 An average of 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Investigations or more fewer than 3 vulnerable adult vulnerable adult Source: Senior investigations in investigations Managers/ the last 5 years over the last 5 Managers years Mark=0 Mark=5 Requirements/ An average of 5 An average of 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 or more fewer than 5 requirements and requirements recommendations and arising from records inspections over arising from the last 5 inspection over the last 5 years Mark=0 Mark=5 TOTAL MARKS 25 25 30 25 25 25 25 Total weighted score for Criteria 1 (total mark x 750 750 900 750 750 750 750 weighting of 30) Notes on Application of Criterion 1 Quality of Care all of the statutory homes scored well against this criteria, with the only – – differential being that Lisgarel had fewer than 5 recommendations and requirements on average over the last 5 years arising from RQIA Care and Pharmacy inspections. Estates inspections requirements and recommendations were not included in the analysis as those estates issues impacting on the Quality of Care would have been included in Care Inspections. Criteria 3 Care Trends Weighting 25 – –
Source: Home Managers compliments in the last 5 Mark=0 compliments in the last 5 years Mark=5 Vulnerable Adult Investigations Source: Senior Managers/ Managers An average of 3 or more vulnerable adult investigations in the last 5 years Mark=0 An average of fewer than 3 vulnerable adult investigations over the last 5 years Mark=5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Requirements/ records An average of 5 or more requirements and recommendations arising from inspections over the last 5 Mark=0 An average of fewer than 5 requirements and arising from inspection over the last 5 years Mark=5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 TOTAL MARKS 25 25 30 25 25 25 25 Total weighted score for Criteria 1 (total mark x weighting of 30) 750 750 900 750 750 750 750 Notes on Application of Criterion 1 – Quality of Care – all of the statutory homes scored well against this criteria, with the only differential being that Lisgarel had fewer than 5 recommendations and requirements on average over the last 5 years arising from RQIA Care and Pharmacy inspections. Estates inspections requirements and recommendations were not included in the analysis as those estates issues impacting on the Quality of Care would have been included in Care Inspections. Criteria 3 – Care Trends – Weighting 25
Appendix_2_of_Consultation_Document_-__Meeting_current_and_future_needs_of_older_people.docx