Improved existing product 16 17 14 (design, quality) Producing the same product since 78 77 80 business started Table 4. Product Innovation in PeMaS and BuMaS Total Response PeMaS Innovation Scenario (%age) Phase (%age) (%age) – II Introduced completely new process (machinery, 0 0 0 technologies) Mining Improved existing process 11 17 8 Firms (component replacement) Same process since business 89 83 92 started Introduced completely new process (machinery, 0 0 0 technologies) Processing Improved existing process 19 20 17 Firms (component replacement) Same process since business 81 80 83 started Table 5. Process Innovation in PeMaS and BuMaS
Improved existing product (design, quality) 16 17 14 Producing the same product since business started 78 77 80 Table 4. Product Innovation in PeMaS and BuMaS Innovation Scenario Total Response (%age) – Phase II PeMaS (%age) (%age) Mining Firms Introduced completely new process (machinery, technologies) 0 0 0 Improved existing process (component replacement) 11 17 8 Same process since business started 89 83 92 Processing Firms Introduced completely new process (machinery, technologies) 0 0 0 Improved existing process (component replacement) 19 20 17 Same process since business started 81 80 83 Table 5. Process Innovation in PeMaS and BuMaS
BAMPeshawarsubmver1.docx