Few/minor mistakes or Some mistakes or omissions in Major mistakes or omissions in omissions in presentation. presentation of results. presentation of results. (10) (8.5) (7) (5) Links results of the experiment Discussion links results of Discussion is general, has few Discussion is brief, to what they indicate experiment to their meaning. specific supporting details. and/or does not SPECIFIC results referenced Some specific results Sources of error, if identified, demonstrate active Analysis/Discussion Discusses limitations of the referenced, though may may not be discussed in terms engagement in analyzing model contain omissions of important of their effects on results. results. Sources of identified and specific data. discussed Discusses limitations of model Sources of identified and discussed. (10) (8.5) (7) (5) Hypothesis supported or Hypothesis supported or Statement made Conclusion is misses key refuted; refuted; hypothesis. elements, and/or does not Includes what students Discusses what students Discussion of what students demonstrate active learned from the lab in terms learned from the lab, but learned from lab is lacks engagement in analyzing Conclusion of scientific principles as well contains some omissions or detail, and/or contains results. experimental design, BLAST, minor mistakes. misconceptions. phylogeny, etc. Identifies Identifies some additional Additional questions, if additional questions that you questions but lacks some identified, are not adequately have detail or engagement addressed (5) (4.25) (3.5) (2.5) Presenter is competent in Presenter is reasonably Presenter has a basic Presenter has a basic knowledge of experiment, competent in understanding of understanding of the lab; understanding of the lab; Presentation analysis, & conclusions; lab; Presentation may be lacking Presentation is not organized, Presentation is organized; Presentation is organized & organization or scientific style; lacks scientific style, and/or far Both slides and verbal meets criteria given; exceeds time limit presentation are done in May have some difficulty with scientific style scientific style Name: Topic:
Few/minor mistakes or omissions in presentation. Some mistakes or omissions in presentation of results. Major mistakes or omissions in presentation of results. Analysis/Discussion (10) Links results of the experiment to what they indicate SPECIFIC results referenced Discusses limitations of the model Sources of identified and discussed (8.5) Discussion links results of experiment to their meaning. Some specific results referenced, though may contain omissions of important specific data. Discusses limitations of model Sources of identified and discussed. (7) Discussion is general, has few specific supporting details. Sources of error, if identified, may not be discussed in terms of their effects on results. (5) Discussion is brief, and/or does not demonstrate active engagement in analyzing results. Conclusion (10) Hypothesis supported or refuted; Includes what students learned from the lab in terms of scientific principles as well experimental design, BLAST, phylogeny, etc. Identifies additional questions that you have (8.5) Hypothesis supported or refuted; Discusses what students learned from the lab, but contains some omissions or minor mistakes. Identifies some additional questions but lacks some detail or engagement (7) Statement made hypothesis. Discussion of what students learned from lab is lacks detail, and/or contains misconceptions. Additional questions, if identified, are not adequately addressed (5) Conclusion is misses key elements, and/or does not demonstrate active engagement in analyzing results. Presentation (5) Presenter is competent in knowledge of experiment, analysis, & conclusions; Presentation is organized; Both slides and verbal presentation are done in scientific style (4.25) Presenter is reasonably competent in understanding of lab; Presentation is organized & meets criteria given; May have some difficulty with scientific style (3.5) Presenter has a basic understanding of the lab; Presentation may be lacking organization or scientific style; (2.5) Presenter has a basic understanding of the lab; Presentation is not organized, lacks scientific style, and/or far exceeds time limit Name: Topic:
AP%20Bio%20Summer%20Assignment%202014%202.docx