solution of contemporary problems. Creative work is understood to mean original or imaginative accomplishment in literature, the arts, or the professions. The faculty member's scholarly work should contribute to the discipline and serve as an indication of professional competence. The criteria for judging the original or imaginative nature of research or creative work must reflect the generally accepted standards prevailing in the applicable discipline or professional area. To qualify as scholarship or creative work, the results of the endeavor must be disseminated and subject to critical peer evaluation in a manner appropriate to the field in question. Evidence of scholarship or creative work is determined by the faculty member's publications, exhibits, performances, or media productions and may be supplemented by evidence of integration of the faculty member’s scholarly work and teaching. The research requirements for tenure in MIDS are the following: Generally a minimum of 6 peer reviewed articles that provide evidence of a research stream. All six articles must be of a level of quality or better. If “B” there are level articles in the portfolio then the count of 6 may be adjusted. If “A” there are level articles in the portfolio then their contribution to the quality “C” and the required count of the portfolio will be determined by the tenured faculty in the department. The quality ratings may come from the Harzing listing, ISI, Financial Times, or in some cases well respected publications within the discipline that rate the quality of journals in that discipline. A minimum of 4 other intellectual contributions. As defined in the Anderson School of Management Academic Qualifications guidelines: OIC = other intellectual contribution, enumerates an intellectual contribution other than PRJ regardless of the form of contribution, including (but not limited to) research monograph, scholarly book, chapter in a scholarly book, textbook, proceedings from a scholarly meeting, paper presented at an academic or professional meeting, publicly available research working paper, paper presented at a faculty research seminar, publication in a trade journal, in-house journal, book review, written case with instructional material, instructional software, and other publicly available material describing the design and implementation of a new curriculum or course. Note: Intellectual contributions must be publicly available, i.e., proprietary and confidential research and consulting reports do not qualify as intellectual contributions. The impact of co-authoring: The evaluation committee of tenured department faculty will consider the effect of sole authored articles and articles that have more than four co-authors. Generally all authors on a publication will be assumed to have contributed equally unless the evidence suggests otherwise.
solution of contemporary problems. Creative work is understood to mean original or imaginative accomplishment in literature, the arts, or the professions. The faculty member's scholarly work should contribute to the discipline and serve as an indication of professional competence. The criteria for judging the original or imaginative nature of research or creative work must reflect the generally accepted standards prevailing in the applicable discipline or professional area. To qualify as scholarship or creative work, the results of the endeavor must be disseminated and subject to critical peer evaluation in a manner appropriate to the field in question. Evidence of scholarship or creative work is determined by the faculty member's publications, exhibits, performances, or media productions and may be supplemented by evidence of integration of the faculty member’s scholarly work and teaching. The research requirements for tenure in MIDS are the following: Generally a minimum of 6 peer reviewed articles that provide evidence of a research stream. All six articles must be of a “B” level of quality or better. If there are “A” level articles in the portfolio then the count of 6 may be adjusted. If there are “C” level articles in the portfolio then their contribution to the quality and the required count of the portfolio will be determined by the tenured faculty in the department. The quality ratings may come from the Harzing listing, ISI, Financial Times, or in some cases well respected publications within the discipline that rate the quality of journals in that discipline. A minimum of 4 other intellectual contributions. As defined in the Anderson School of Management Academic Qualifications guidelines: OIC = other intellectual contribution, enumerates an intellectual contribution other than PRJ regardless of the form of contribution, including (but not limited to) research monograph, scholarly book, chapter in a scholarly book, textbook, proceedings from a scholarly meeting, paper presented at an academic or professional meeting, publicly available research working paper, paper presented at a faculty research seminar, publication in a trade journal, in-house journal, book review, written case with instructional material, instructional software, and other publicly available material describing the design and implementation of a new curriculum or course. Note: Intellectual contributions must be publicly available, i.e., proprietary and confidential research and consulting reports do not qualify as intellectual contributions. The impact of co-authoring: The evaluation committee of tenured department faculty will consider the effect of sole authored articles and articles that have more than four co-authors. Generally all authors on a publication will be assumed to have contributed equally unless the evidence suggests otherwise.
ASM%20PT%20Mentoring%20Guidelines%20Nov%202012.docx