dishonest action deprives him of i.e., whether they dealt with judge in liberty. . his judicial capacity. 40 that cite this headnote 39 Cases that cite this headnote [9] [12] Judges Rights, Powers, Duties, and Liabilities Liabilities for Official Acts District and Prosecuting Attorneys To determine if judge acted with Liabilities for Official Acts, Negligence, or jurisdiction, courts focus on whether Misconduct judge was acting clearly beyond Judges Rights, Powers, Duties, and Liabilities scope of subject matter jurisdiction Liabilities for Official Acts in contrast to personal jurisdiction; Immunity afforded judges and where not clearly lacking prosecutors is not absolute. jurisdiction, judge is entitled 17 Cases that cite this headnote to immunity even if there were no personal jurisdiction over complaining party. [10] 8 Cases that cite this headnote Judges Rights, Powers, Duties, and Liabilities Liabilities for Official Acts [13] Judge lacks immunity where he acts in clear absence of all jurisdiction or District and Prosecuting Attorneys performs an act that is not judicial in Liabilities for Official Acts, Negligence, or nature. Misconduct Immunity extends to protect 16 Cases that cite this headnote prosecutor who acts within his or her authority and in a quasi-judicial capacity; focus is on nature or [11] function of prosecutor’s activity. 29 Cases that cite this headnote Judges Rights, Powers, Duties, and Liabilities Liabilities for Official Acts Factors relevant in determining [14] whether an act is judicial so as to be protected by immunity relate to District and Prosecuting Attorneys nature of act itself, i.e., whether it is Liabilities for Official Acts, Negligence, or a function normally performed by a Misconduct Where prosecutor acts as advocate in judge, and to expectations of parties,
dishonest action deprives him of liberty. . 40 that cite this headnote [9] District and Prosecuting Attorneys Liabilities for Official Acts, Negligence, or Misconduct Judges Rights, Powers, Duties, and Liabilities Liabilities for Official Acts Immunity afforded judges and prosecutors is not absolute. 17 Cases that cite this headnote [10] Judges Rights, Powers, Duties, and Liabilities Liabilities for Official Acts Judge lacks immunity where he acts in clear absence of all jurisdiction or performs an act that is not judicial in nature. 16 Cases that cite this headnote [11] Judges Rights, Powers, Duties, and Liabilities Liabilities for Official Acts Factors relevant in determining whether an act is judicial so as to be protected by immunity relate to nature of act itself, i.e., whether it is a function normally performed by a judge, and to expectations of parties, i.e., whether they dealt with judge in his judicial capacity. 39 Cases that cite this headnote [12] Judges Rights, Powers, Duties, and Liabilities Liabilities for Official Acts To determine if judge acted with jurisdiction, courts focus on whether judge was acting clearly beyond scope of subject matter jurisdiction in contrast to personal jurisdiction; where not clearly lacking jurisdiction, judge is entitled to immunity even if there were no personal jurisdiction over complaining party. 8 Cases that cite this headnote [13] District and Prosecuting Attorneys Liabilities for Official Acts, Negligence, or Misconduct Immunity extends to protect prosecutor who acts within his or her authority and in a quasi-judicial capacity; focus is on nature or function of prosecutor’s activity. 29 Cases that cite this headnote [14] District and Prosecuting Attorneys Liabilities for Official Acts, Negligence, or Misconduct Where prosecutor acts as advocate in
ashelman-v-pope-793-f2d-1072-en-banc-9th-circuit-1986.docx