Alan Reifman et al., 16 Law & Hum. Real Jurors’ Understanding of the Law in Real Behav. 539 (1992). David L. Rosenhan et al., 18 Law & Hum. Behav. 53 (1994). Notetaking Can Aid Juror Recall, Jessica M. Salerno & Shari Seidman Diamond, The Promise of a Cognitive Perspective on Jury 17 Psychonomic Bulletin & Rev. 174 (2010). Deliberation, Leonard B. Sand & Steven Alan Reiss, A Report on Seven Experiments Conducted by District 60 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 423 (1985). Court Judges in the Second Circuit, William W. Schwarzer, 69 Cal L. Rev. Communicating with Juries: Problems and Remedies, 731 (1981). William W. Schwarzer, 1990 U. Chi. Legal F. 119. Reforming Jury Trials, Vicki L. Smith, 61 J. Prototypes in the Courtroom: Lay Representations of Legal Concepts, Personality & Social Psychol. 857 (1991). Vicki L. Smith, Impact of Pretrial Instruction on Jurors’ Information Processing and Decision 76 J. Applied Psychol. 220 (1991). Making, Vicki L. Smith, The Feasibility and Utility of Pretrial Instruction in the Substantive Law: A 14 Law & Hum. Behav. 235 (1990). Survey of Judges, Peter Meijes Tiersma, 22 Hofstra L. Rev. 37 Reforming the Language of Jury Instructions, (1993). Jeannine Turgeon & Elizabeth A. Francis, Improving Pennsylvania’s Justice System through 18 Widener L.J. 419 (2009). Jury System Innovations, Neil Vidmar & Valerie P. Hans, American Juries: The Verdict (2007). Neil Vidmar & Matthew W. Fairness through Guidance: Jury Instruction on Punitive 2 Charleston L. Rev. 307 (2008). Damages after Philip Morris v. Williams, Ryan J. Winter & Edith Greene, Handbook of Applied Cognition Juror Decision-Making, in 739–761 (Francis Durso ed., 2nd ed. 2007).
Alan Reifman et al., Real Jurors’ Understanding of the Law in Real 16 Law & Hum. Behav. 539 (1992). David L. Rosenhan et al., Notetaking Can Aid Juror Recall, 18 Law & Hum. Behav. 53 (1994). Jessica M. Salerno & Shari Seidman Diamond, The Promise of a Cognitive Perspective on Jury Deliberation, 17 Psychonomic Bulletin & Rev. 174 (2010). Leonard B. Sand & Steven Alan Reiss, A Report on Seven Experiments Conducted by District Court Judges in the Second Circuit, 60 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 423 (1985). William W. Schwarzer, Communicating with Juries: Problems and Remedies, 69 Cal L. Rev. 731 (1981). William W. Schwarzer, Reforming Jury Trials, 1990 U. Chi. Legal F. 119. Vicki L. Smith, Prototypes in the Courtroom: Lay Representations of Legal Concepts, 61 J. Personality & Social Psychol. 857 (1991). Vicki L. Smith, Impact of Pretrial Instruction on Jurors’ Information Processing and Decision Making, 76 J. Applied Psychol. 220 (1991). Vicki L. Smith, The Feasibility and Utility of Pretrial Instruction in the Substantive Law: A Survey of Judges, 14 Law & Hum. Behav. 235 (1990). Peter Meijes Tiersma, Reforming the Language of Jury Instructions, 22 Hofstra L. Rev. 37 (1993). Jeannine Turgeon & Elizabeth A. Francis, Improving Pennsylvania’s Justice System through Jury System Innovations, 18 Widener L.J. 419 (2009). Neil Vidmar & Valerie P. Hans, American Juries: The Verdict (2007). Neil Vidmar & Matthew W. Fairness through Guidance: Jury Instruction on Punitive Damages after Philip Morris v. Williams, 2 Charleston L. Rev. 307 (2008). Ryan J. Winter & Edith Greene, Juror Decision-Making, in Handbook of Applied Cognition 739–761 (Francis Durso ed., 2nd ed. 2007).
Appendices_compiled_2018.docx