are within acceptable parameters to ensure resident safety. 90 days Criterion 2.2.2.1 PA Two residents using enablers and two residents i) One of two enabler All enabler and using restraints’ clinical files were reviewed for assessments and consents restraint use to In assessing whether restraint will be used, safe and appropriate enabler and restraint use. were not completed. be aligned with appropriate factors are taken into consideration requirements by a suitably skilled service provider. This shall Restraint assessments, consent, risks, ii) Two of two enabler risks and good include but is not limited to: monitoring, review and long-term care plans are were not identified during practice. (a) Any risks related to the use of restraint; not consistently completed for all residents using assessment. (b) Any underlying causes for the relevant enablers/restraint. iii) Two of two enabler risks behaviour or condition if known; and two of two restraint 90 days (c) Existing advance directives the consumer risks were not reflected in may have made; the long-term care plan. (d) Whether the consumer has been restrained in the past and, if so, an evaluation of these iv) Two of two restraint episodes; monitoring were not (e) Any history of trauma or abuse, which may completed. have involved the consumer being held against v) Two of two enablers have their will; not been reviewed for (f) Maintaining culturally safe practice; appropriateness of current (g) Desired outcome and criteria for ending use. restraint (which should be made explicit and, as much as practicable, made clear to the consumer); (h) Possible alternative intervention/strategies.
are within acceptable parameters to ensure resident safety. 90 days Criterion 2.2.2.1 In assessing whether restraint will be used, appropriate factors are taken into consideration by a suitably skilled service provider. This shall include but is not limited to: (a) Any risks related to the use of restraint; (b) Any underlying causes for the relevant behaviour or condition if known; (c) Existing advance directives the consumer may have made; (d) Whether the consumer has been restrained in the past and, if so, an evaluation of these episodes; (e) Any history of trauma or abuse, which may have involved the consumer being held against their will; (f) Maintaining culturally safe practice; (g) Desired outcome and criteria for ending restraint (which should be made explicit and, as much as practicable, made clear to the consumer); (h) Possible alternative intervention/strategies. PA Two residents using enablers and two residents using restraints’ clinical files were reviewed for safe and appropriate enabler and restraint use. Restraint assessments, consent, risks, monitoring, review and long-term care plans are not consistently completed for all residents using enablers/restraint. i) One of two enabler assessments and consents were not completed. ii) Two of two enabler risks were not identified during assessment. iii) Two of two enabler risks and two of two restraint risks were not reflected in the long-term care plan. iv) Two of two restraint monitoring were not completed. v) Two of two enablers have not been reviewed for appropriateness of current use. All enabler and restraint use to be aligned with requirements and good practice. 90 days
AuditSummary_PRMS_CommunicatePublish_000005764002.docx