ASSESSMENT CRITERIA QUANTITATIVE-BASED WORK – Level 7 Classification % Knowledge and Problem Solving Calculations Analysis and Presentation of Work Understanding Interpretation Distinction 70 100 Systematic understanding of Independent and professional in the Can use a range of techniques Very high level of Excellent well directed – specialised and/or applied approach taken to complex problem appropriately and demonstrates competence in analysing presentation, logically areas of theoretical or solving innovation and creativity in and interpreting complex or structured research based knowledge complex and unpredictable incomplete data and in situations communicating the outcome Commendation 60 69 understanding of Largely independent and professional in Uses techniques effectively and Competent in analysing and Clearly presented, – specialised or applied areas the approach taken to complex problem demonstrates innovation and interpreting complex or logically structured of theoretical or research solving creativity in complex situations incomplete data and in based knowledge communicating the outcome Pass 50 - 59 Demonstrates understanding Reasonably competent in solving of Uses techniques effectively and Reasonably competent in Neat presentation and of specialised or applied complex problems demonstrates some innovation or analysing and interpreting structure areas of theoretical or creativity in complex situations complex or incomplete data research based knowledge and in communicating the outcome Fail 45 49 Limited understanding of Solve complex problems only with some Some errors in techniques used, Limited ability to analyse Weak presentation – specialised or applied areas guidance or direction work lacks innovation or creativity, and/or interpret complex or and structure (marginal) of theoretical or research reliance on routine procedures incomplete data and in based knowledge communicating the outcome Fail 31 - 44 Very limited understanding of Limited ability to solve complex problems Many errors in techniques used, Little or no analysis and Poor presentation and specialised or applied areas no innovation or creativity shown, interpretation of complex structure of theoretical or research reliance on routine procedures data, poor presentation of based knowledge results Fail 0 30 Has not grasped the Very limited ability to solve complex Inability to use techniques, routine No analysis or interpretation Unacceptable – theoretical or research base problems procedures have errors of complex data, poor or presentation, and of the subject very poor presentation of structure results
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA – QUANTITATIVE-BASED WORK Level 7 Classification % Knowledge and Understanding Problem Solving Calculations Analysis and Interpretation Presentation of Work Distinction 70 – 100 Systematic understanding of specialised and/or applied areas of theoretical or research based knowledge Independent and professional in the approach taken to complex problem solving Can use a range of techniques appropriately and demonstrates innovation and creativity in complex and unpredictable situations Very high level of competence in analysing and interpreting complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcome Excellent well directed presentation, logically structured Commendation 60 – 69 understanding of specialised or applied areas of theoretical or research based knowledge Largely independent and professional in the approach taken to complex problem solving Uses techniques effectively and demonstrates innovation and creativity in complex situations Competent in analysing and interpreting complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcome Clearly presented, logically structured Pass 50 - 59 Demonstrates understanding of specialised or applied areas of theoretical or research based knowledge Reasonably competent in solving of complex problems Uses techniques effectively and demonstrates some innovation or creativity in complex situations Reasonably competent in analysing and interpreting complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcome Neat presentation and structure Fail (marginal) 45 – 49 Limited understanding of specialised or applied areas of theoretical or research based knowledge Solve complex problems only with some guidance or direction Some errors in techniques used, work lacks innovation or creativity, reliance on routine procedures Limited ability to analyse and/or interpret complex or incomplete data and in communicating the outcome Weak presentation and structure Fail 31 - 44 Very limited understanding of specialised or applied areas of theoretical or research based knowledge Limited ability to solve complex problems Many errors in techniques used, no innovation or creativity shown, reliance on routine procedures Little or no analysis and interpretation of complex data, poor presentation of results Poor presentation and structure Fail 0 – 30 Has not grasped the theoretical or research base of the subject Very limited ability to solve complex problems Inability to use techniques, routine procedures have errors No analysis or interpretation of complex data, poor or very poor presentation of results Unacceptable presentation, and structure
Assessment-Criteria.docx