Table 3. Profiling of intelligibility assessment First author Recording Stimulus Intelligibility Number of Assessor Assessment environment organisation in context assessors expertise task or without context? Barnish Recorded in A blended In context 64 Staff or Transcription participants’ presentation students of the homes approach was University of used. The East Anglia allocation of without stimuli to expertise in assessors speech followed disorders Square and presentation order was randomised Coates Recorded in Not stated In context 8 Speech and Transcription participants’ and without language context therapists Donovan Recorded in Not stated In context 3 Speech and Transcription participants’ language homes (71/75) therapists or in clinic (4/75) Miller Recorded in Each assessor Without 3 Assessors Transcription participants’ was randomly context were unfamiliar homes assigned the with recordings of 5 Parkinson’s different disease speakers
Table 3. Profiling of intelligibility assessment First author Recording environment Stimulus organisation Intelligibility in context or without context? Number of assessors Assessor expertise Assessment task Barnish Recorded in participants’ homes A blended presentation approach was used. The allocation of stimuli to assessors followed Square and presentation order was randomised In context 64 Staff or students of the University of East Anglia without expertise in speech disorders Transcription Coates Recorded in participants’ Not stated In context and without context 8 Speech and language therapists Transcription Donovan Recorded in participants’ homes (71/75) or in clinic (4/75) Not stated In context 3 Speech and language therapists Transcription Miller Recorded in participants’ homes Each assessor was randomly assigned the recordings of 5 different speakers Without context 3 Assessors were unfamiliar with Parkinson’s disease Transcription
Barnish_et_al_final_manuscript.docx