Western Riparian Woodland and Riparian Shrubland SRM 203: Riparian Woodland 1 Douglas-fir-Grand Fir-White Fir Forest Conifer and Woodland SAF 213: Grand Fir 0 Conifer Limber Pine Woodland SAF 219: Limber Pine 0 Conifer Lodgepole Pine Forest and Woodland SAF 218: Lodgepole Pine 0 Douglas-fir-Ponderosa Pine-Lodgepole Conifer Pine Forest and Woodland SAF 210: Interior Douglas-Fir 0 Douglas-fir-Grand Fir-White Fir Forest Conifer and Woodland SAF 211: White Fir 0 Ponderosa Pine Forest, Woodland and SAF 237: Interior Ponderosa Conifer Savanna Pine 0 SAF 206: Engelmann Conifer Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland Fir 0 SAF 206: Engelmann Conifer Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland Fir 0 Conifer Limber Pine Woodland SAF 209: Bristlecone Pine 0 Fig. S1 (A) Flowchart showing the workflow of the and riparian vegetation departure index, – (B) flowchart showing the workflow of the riparian vegetation conversion type classification. Fig. S2 illustration of pixel-level conversion type classifications for an assessment site –Example within the Weber River watershed, Utah. Insets 1 and 2 display two areas in which ‘conversion to agriculture’ and to minor vegetation conversion’ were the dominant conversion ‘negligible types.
Riparian Western Riparian Woodland and Shrubland SRM 203: Riparian Woodland 1 Conifer Douglas-fir-Grand Fir-White Fir Forest and Woodland SAF 213: Grand Fir 0 Conifer Limber Pine Woodland SAF 219: Limber Pine 0 Conifer Lodgepole Pine Forest and Woodland SAF 218: Lodgepole Pine 0 Conifer Douglas-fir-Ponderosa Pine-Lodgepole Pine Forest and Woodland SAF 210: Interior Douglas-Fir 0 Conifer Douglas-fir-Grand Fir-White Fir Forest and Woodland SAF 211: White Fir 0 Conifer Ponderosa Pine Forest, Woodland and Savanna SAF 237: Interior Ponderosa Pine 0 Conifer Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland SAF 206: Engelmann Fir 0 Conifer Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland SAF 206: Engelmann Fir 0 Conifer Limber Pine Woodland SAF 209: Bristlecone Pine 0 Fig. S1 – (A) Flowchart showing the workflow of the riparian vegetation departure index, and (B) flowchart showing the workflow of the riparian vegetation conversion type classification. Fig. S2 –Example illustration of pixel-level conversion type classifications for an assessment site within the Weber River watershed, Utah. Insets 1 and 2 display two areas in which ‘conversion to agriculture’ and ‘negligible to minor vegetation conversion’ were the dominant conversion types.
1-s2.0-S0301479716308489-mmc3.docx