ASSESSMENT CRITERIA WORK – Level 7 Classification % Range Content Application of Knowledge and Evidence of Referencing Presentation, Grammar Theory Understanding Reading and and Spelling Bibliography Distinction 70 100 Critical insightful evaluation and Extensive evidence of Exceptional knowledge and Extensive evidence Outstanding Outstanding, well-directed – synthesis of complex high of advanced applications conceptual understanding of of integrating referencing and presentation, logically and originality and reflection. and/or empirical complex and/or specialised supplementary bibliography coherently structured, using Demonstrates the ability to pursue results, applicable, principles and concepts and sources correct grammar, spelling research at Doctoral level informed extensively the development and and citation by current research advancement of ideas and and practice in the practice area Commendation 60 69 Critical evaluation and synthesis evidence of Wide knowledge and depth of Evidence of Comprehensive Excellent presentation, – of complex issues and material relevant applications understanding of complex extensive reading of referencing and logically structured, using includes an original and and/or empirical and/or specialised principles supplementary bibliography correct grammar and citation reflective approach results, where and concepts and the sources applicable, informed development of ideas and by current research practice and practice in the area 50 59 Some critical evaluation and Evidence of relevant Appropriate knowledge and Evidence of reading Adequate Orderly presentation, clear – synthesis of key issues and applications and/or depth of understanding of key supplementary referencing and structure and acceptable Pass material empirical results, principles and concepts with sources bibliography grammar and spelling where applicable with some understanding of their some links to current development in practice research in the area Fail 45 49 Some evaluation and synthesis of Occasional relevant Basic knowledge and depth of Limited evidence of Limited Adequate presentation and – issues and material applications and/or understanding of key reading referencing and structure, grammar, spelling (marginal) empirical results, principles and concepts only bibliography and citation where applicable 31 44 Limited evaluation and synthesis Limited applications Limited and/or superficial Minimal evidence of Inadequate Poor presentation and – of issues and material and/or empirical knowledge of key principles reading referencing and structure, grammar, spelling Fail results, where and concepts bibliography and citation applicable 0 30 Little or no evaluation and Little or no evidence of Virtually devoid of any Little or no evidence Inadequate Inadequate presentation, – synthesis of issues and material relevant application evidence of knowledge and of reading referencing and structure, grammar, spelling Fail and/or empirical understanding bibliography and citation results
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA – WORK Level 7 Classification % Range Content Application of Theory Knowledge and Understanding Evidence of Reading Referencing and Bibliography Presentation, Grammar and Spelling Distinction 70 – 100 Critical insightful evaluation and synthesis of complex high of originality and reflection. Demonstrates the ability to pursue research at Doctoral level Extensive evidence of advanced applications and/or empirical results, applicable, informed extensively by current research and practice in the area Exceptional knowledge and conceptual understanding of complex and/or specialised principles and concepts and the development and advancement of ideas and practice Extensive evidence of integrating supplementary sources Outstanding referencing and bibliography Outstanding, well-directed presentation, logically and coherently structured, using correct grammar, spelling and citation Commendation 60 – 69 Critical evaluation and synthesis of complex issues and material includes an original and reflective approach evidence of relevant applications and/or empirical results, where applicable, informed by current research and practice in the area Wide knowledge and depth of understanding of complex and/or specialised principles and concepts and the development of ideas and practice Evidence of extensive reading of supplementary sources Comprehensive referencing and bibliography Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and citation Pass 50 – 59 Some critical evaluation and synthesis of key issues and material Evidence of relevant applications and/or empirical results, where applicable with some links to current research in the area Appropriate knowledge and depth of understanding of key principles and concepts with some understanding of their development in practice Evidence of reading supplementary sources Adequate referencing and bibliography Orderly presentation, clear structure and acceptable grammar and spelling Fail (marginal) 45 – 49 Some evaluation and synthesis of issues and material Occasional relevant applications and/or empirical results, where applicable Basic knowledge and depth of understanding of key principles and concepts only Limited evidence of reading Limited referencing and bibliography Adequate presentation and structure, grammar, spelling and citation Fail 31 – 44 Limited evaluation and synthesis of issues and material Limited applications and/or empirical results, where applicable Limited and/or superficial knowledge of key principles and concepts Minimal evidence of reading Inadequate referencing and bibliography Poor presentation and structure, grammar, spelling and citation Fail 0 – 30 Little or no evaluation and synthesis of issues and material Little or no evidence of relevant application and/or empirical results Virtually devoid of any evidence of knowledge and understanding Little or no evidence of reading Inadequate referencing and bibliography Inadequate presentation, structure, grammar, spelling and citation
Assessment-Criteria.docx