_____, which occurred before the case was transferred to common pleas court, where Deion was prosecuted as an adult. This transcript is necessary to the effective pursuit of appeal to the Franklin County of Appeals. is indigent and lacks the means to pay the cost of preparing such transcript from his own resources. Therefore, he is entitled to a complete transcript of proceedings at state expense. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 19, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956). Indigent defendants in the State of Ohio are constitutionally entitled to adequate and effective appellate review. at 19; Griffin Mayer 404 U.S. 189, 194, 92 S.Ct. 410, 30 L.Ed.2d 372 (1971). v. Chicago, This review is without a transcript or adequate “impossible substitute.” 430 U.S. 817, 822, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 Bounds v. Smith, L.Ed.2d 72 (1977). Thus, can be no doubt that the state must “there provide an indigent defendant with a transcript of prior proceedings when that transcript is needed for an effective defense or appeal.” Britt v. 404 U.S. 226, 227, 92 S.Ct. 431, 30 L.Ed.2d 400 North Carolina, (1971); 42 Ohio St.2d 114,326 N.E.2d 667 see also State v. Arrington,
_____, which occurred before the case was transferred to common pleas court, where Deion was prosecuted as an adult. This transcript is necessary to the effective pursuit of appeal to the Franklin County of Appeals. is indigent and lacks the means to pay the cost of preparing such transcript from his own resources. Therefore, he is entitled to a complete transcript of proceedings at state expense. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 19, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956). Indigent defendants in the State of Ohio are constitutionally entitled to adequate and effective appellate review. Griffin at 19; Mayer v. Chicago, 404 U.S. 189, 194, 92 S.Ct. 410, 30 L.Ed.2d 372 (1971). This review is “impossible without a transcript or adequate substitute.” Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 822, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977). Thus, “there can be no doubt that the state must provide an indigent defendant with a transcript of prior proceedings when that transcript is needed for an effective defense or appeal.” Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U.S. 226, 227, 92 S.Ct. 431, 30 L.Ed.2d 400 (1971); see also State v. Arrington, 42 Ohio St.2d 114,326 N.E.2d 667
BINDOVER%20NOA%20-%2010th%20Dist%202.docx