if something changes, yes, you need to give them a revised award in whatever way that you do that. Participant: Okay. Alyssa, Walter Kelly, and just keep in mind, we're kind of speaking to the comments of the tweaks that were suggested, and more specifically, currently discussing F. Participant: Might this also be time to consider a short break? Ms. Miller: I was going to say, it is 3 o'clock. Okay. So why don't we take a 15-minute break. Be back 3:15. Participant: Okay. So I would like to redirect the group just in the time we have left today, and understanding, we will have to leave time at the end for public comment as well as some housekeeping items, but I just wanted to guide us back into the discussion that we were having beforehand. And this was kind of on the general tweaks that were suggested by many of the group members, Aaron, Valerie, Michael, Lodriguez. And when we left, I believe we were talking about Section F, so 2F. So we will go Alyssa, Dan, Kelly, and then continue the discussion. And then also, on my list, I have other points that we discussed, and will discuss, is the inclusion of a reasonable person standard, and then I believe the comment that Ashley had brought up about the inclusion of a reasonable period on some of these. So if your comments do not fall into the reasonable person or the reasonable period, discuss them now in this kind of general time. Okay. So Alyssa, Dan, Kelly, and now I see Abby. Ms. Dobson: So I think a lot of my concern was alleviated with AnnMarie's last comment about the intent of the statement made in F, but I think it should be further explained or at least ingrained into that verbiage, because it does say, representation
if something changes, yes, you need to give them a revised award in whatever way that you do that. Participant: Okay. Alyssa, Walter Kelly, and just keep in mind, we're kind of speaking to the comments of the tweaks that were suggested, and more specifically, currently discussing F. Participant: Might this also be time to consider a short break? Ms. Miller: I was going to say, it is 3 o'clock. Okay. So why don't we take a 15-minute break. Be back 3:15. Participant: Okay. So I would like to redirect the group just in the time we have left today, and understanding, we will have to leave time at the end for public comment as well as some housekeeping items, but I just wanted to guide us back into the discussion that we were having beforehand. And this was kind of on the general tweaks that were suggested by many of the group members, Aaron, Valerie, Michael, Lodriguez. And when we left, I believe we were talking about Section F, so 2F. So we will go Alyssa, Dan, Kelly, and then continue the discussion. And then also, on my list, I have other points that we discussed, and will discuss, is the inclusion of a reasonable person standard, and then I believe the comment that Ashley had brought up about the inclusion of a reasonable period on some of these. So if your comments do not fall into the reasonable person or the reasonable period, discuss them now in this kind of general time. Okay. So Alyssa, Dan, Kelly, and now I see Abby. Ms. Dobson: So I think a lot of my concern was alleviated with AnnMarie's last comment about the intent of the statement made in F, but I think it should be further explained or at least ingrained into that verbiage, because it does say, representation
bdday1session2.docx