Sexual material for the investigation of Harassment, discrimination Harassment & and Reprisal complaints by the Professional Standards Unit, Reprisal in consultation with a human rights expert. Dhamrait v. JVI Canada, 14 May 2010 Race, Colour, Employment Application Granted. 2010 HRTO 1085 Ancestry, General Damages: Ethnic Origin, A1 - $3,000, A2 - $13,000. Age Special Damages: A2 - $18,500 lost wages. Public Interest Remedy: Reinstatement of A2 in 30 days, based on assessment that evidence upon which I could conclude that, but for the “no discriminatory factors, A. would nevertheless have been laid off”. Fleming v. North Bay 20 Jan. 2011 Disability Employment Reconsideration Denied (unrepresented A had full – (City), 2011 HRTO 140 opportunity to present his case). Ilevbare v. Domain Registry 29 Oct. 2010 Disability Employment Application Granted. Group, 2010 HRTO 2173 General Damages: $15,000. Special Damages: $38,400 (lost income). Inward v. Toronto (City), 21 Oct. 2010 Sex, Family Goods, Services Application Dismissed (jurisdiction prosecutorial – 2010 HRTO 2127 Status or Facilities immunity). Ornelas v. Casamici 13 May 2010 Sex, Sexual Employment Application Dismissed (merits). Restaurant, 2010 HRTO Harassment, 1078 Reprisal Rutledge v. Fitness One 7 Oct. 2010 Disability Goods, Services Application Granted. Inc., 2010 HRTO 2039 or Facilities General Damages: $2,500. Special Damages: $198.22 (out-of-pocket expenses). Sutton v. Jarvis Ryan 7 Dec. 2010 Sex / Sexual Employment, Application Granted (in part). Associates, 2010 HRTO Harassment Contracts 2421 Public Interest Remedy: Within 90 days, R to complete the Human Rights online training Rights 101” and confirm completion to the “Human
Sexual Harassment & Reprisal material for the investigation of Harassment, discrimination and Reprisal complaints by the Professional Standards Unit, in consultation with a human rights expert. Dhamrait v. JVI Canada, 2010 HRTO 1085 14 May 2010 Race, Colour, Ancestry, Ethnic Origin, Age Employment Application Granted. General Damages: A1 - $3,000, A2 - $13,000. Special Damages: A2 - $18,500 lost wages. Public Interest Remedy: Reinstatement of A2 in 30 days, based on assessment that “no evidence upon which I could conclude that, but for the discriminatory factors, A. would nevertheless have been laid off”. Fleming v. North Bay (City), 2011 HRTO 140 20 Jan. 2011 Disability Employment Reconsideration – Denied (unrepresented A had full opportunity to present his case). Ilevbare v. Domain Registry Group, 2010 HRTO 2173 29 Oct. 2010 Disability Employment Application Granted. General Damages: $15,000. Special Damages: $38,400 (lost income). Inward v. Toronto (City), 2010 HRTO 2127 21 Oct. 2010 Sex, Family Status Goods, Services or Facilities Application Dismissed (jurisdiction – prosecutorial immunity). Ornelas v. Casamici Restaurant, 2010 HRTO 1078 13 May 2010 Sex, Sexual Harassment, Reprisal Employment Application Dismissed (merits). Rutledge v. Fitness One Inc., 2010 HRTO 2039 7 Oct. 2010 Disability Goods, Services or Facilities Application Granted. General Damages: $2,500. Special Damages: $198.22 (out-of-pocket expenses). Sutton v. Jarvis Ryan Associates, 2010 HRTO 2421 7 Dec. 2010 Sex / Sexual Harassment Employment, Contracts Application Granted (in part). Public Interest Remedy: Within 90 days, R to complete the Human Rights online training “Human Rights 101” and confirm completion to the
AnnualReport2010-11Appendix2_Decisions%20Table.docx