123 BBS was less responsive than Mao, 2002 9 Assessed at 14-30 days after stroke onset the Fugl-Meyer and the and in later stages 90 to 180 days post Postural Assessment Scale stroke 48 Yes/no Minimal detectable change Stevenson, 2001 83 Reassessed after 1-2 weeks of intervention estimated to be + 6 BBS points (N=48) Inpatient rehabilitation (90% confident of genuine change) Only 25/45 subjects showed agreement between statistical change and clinicians’ perceptions of change. Population N = Reference and intervention Data Supporting Descriptor Responsiveness Yes/No s/p Stroke 42 no Spastic grp: Wang, 200584 40 min sessions, 5/wk; 20 sessions total Bobath pre=6 Post=20.5 (p=.001) Spastic group: Bobath tx vs. orthopedic tx Ortho pre=10.7 Pts with relative recovery: Bobath tx vs. orthopedic tx Post=20.4 (p=.000) Rel recov grp: Bobath pre=16 post=35 (p=.001) Ortho Pre=33 Post=40.3 (p=.000) Change scores between Bobath and grps are not significant for either spastic or relative recovery grp. 20 yes Pre: 45 (7) Leroux, 2005 85 1 hr, 2x/week for 8 weeks Post: 49(5) pre/post measures (p<.008) Intervention: Group sessions aimed at strengthening UEs and LEs, balance, mobility, coordination 91 no Control: Salbach, 2004 86] 3x/week for 6 weeks Pre: 40 Post: 41 Experimental Group (N=44): Functional task activities to increase LE Exp: strength, balance, speed and walking Pre: 42 distance Post: 44, NS Control Group (N=47): UE activities 91 Low correlation between BBS Salbach, 2006 87 3x/week for 6 weeks and ABC scale after interventions: Grp 1 (N=47): UE intervention -.05 walking grp -.06 UE grp Grp 2 (N=44): Task-oriented interventions targeting Predictive model research walking
123 Mao, 2002 9 Assessed at 14-30 days after stroke onset and in later stages 90 to 180 days post stroke BBS was less responsive than the Fugl-Meyer and the Postural Assessment Scale 48 Stevenson, 2001 83 Reassessed after 1-2 weeks of intervention (N=48) Inpatient rehabilitation Only 25/45 subjects showed agreement between statistical change and clinicians’ perceptions of change. Yes/no Minimal detectable change estimated to be + 6 BBS points (90% confident of genuine change) Population Descriptor N = Reference and intervention Yes/No Data Supporting Responsiveness s/p Stroke 42 Wang, 200584 40 min sessions, 5/wk; 20 sessions total Spastic group: Bobath tx vs. orthopedic tx Pts with relative recovery: Bobath tx vs. orthopedic tx no Spastic grp: Bobath pre=6 Post=20.5 (p=.001) Ortho pre=10.7 Post=20.4 (p=.000) Rel recov grp: Bobath pre=16 post=35 (p=.001) Ortho Pre=33 Post=40.3 (p=.000) Change scores between Bobath and grps are not significant for either spastic or relative recovery grp. 20 Leroux, 2005 85 1 hr, 2x/week for 8 weeks pre/post measures Intervention: Group sessions aimed at strengthening UEs and LEs, balance, mobility, coordination yes Pre: 45 (7) Post: 49(5) (p<.008) 91 Salbach, 2004 86] 3x/week for 6 weeks Experimental Group (N=44): Functional task activities to increase LE strength, balance, speed and walking distance Control Group (N=47): UE activities no Control: Pre: 40 Post: 41 Exp: Pre: 42 Post: 44, NS 91 Salbach, 2006 87 3x/week for 6 weeks Grp 1 (N=47): UE intervention Grp 2 (N=44): Task-oriented interventions targeting walking Low correlation between BBS and ABC scale after interventions: -.05 walking grp -.06 UE grp Predictive model research
berg_balance_scale.docx