1 2 3 4 Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Expected No mention of expected Vaguely states expected outcomes States expected outcomes and Provides detail on short term Outcomes outcomes or results. and does not clearly identify them gives some information on (immediate results), intermediate as short, interim, or long term. which are short, interim, and (change in a few weeks or long term. months), and long term (change in months or a year) outcomes. Includes how outcomes will be ascertained. 5. Timeline No mention of project start, Provides some information on Provides start date, important Provides start date, important milestone, or completion dates. project timeline. milestone dates during project, milestone dates during project, and completion date. and completion date. Describes how project will continue after funding ends. 6. Attached budget Budget is attached but no Budget is attached and gives vague Budget is attached and justifies Budget is attached and clearly & justification of justification for use of funds. justification of project cost. Some with some clarity use of project justifies use of project funds. use of Line items are inappropriate for line items are inappropriate for the Line items are appropriate Line items are appropriate for the the project. (Faculty salary and project. (Faculty salary and for the project. (Faculty salary project. (Faculty salary and computer equipment costs not computer equipment costs not and computer equipment costs computer equipment costs not allowed). allowed). not allowed). allowed). 7. Relevance to No explanation of how the Vague description of how the Somewhat describes how Describes the importance of health equity problem is relevant to health problem is relevant to health problem is relevant to health addressing this problem to advance the field of health equity equity. No description of how equity. Unclear how project will equity and how it advances the and practice. Clearly states how project will advance the field of advance the field of health equity field of health equity research project will advance the field of health equity research or research or practice. and practice. health equity research or practice. practice. 8. How the project No explanation of how project Unclear explanation of how project Explains how project advances Explains well how project advances the advances faculty member’s advances faculty member’s faculty member’s research or advances faculty member’s faculty member’s research or practice. research or practice. practice with some detail. research or practice. research POINTS FOR ALL DOMAINS (range 8-32)
1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Good 4 Excellent 4. Expected Outcomes No mention of expected outcomes or results. Vaguely states expected outcomes and does not clearly identify them as short, interim, or long term. States expected outcomes and gives some information on which are short, interim, and long term. Provides detail on short term (immediate results), intermediate (change in a few weeks or months), and long term (change in months or a year) outcomes. Includes how outcomes will be ascertained. 5. Timeline No mention of project start, milestone, or completion dates. Provides some information on project timeline. Provides start date, important milestone dates during project, and completion date. Provides start date, important milestone dates during project, and completion date. Describes how project will continue after funding ends. 6. Attached budget & justification of use of Budget is attached but no justification for use of funds. Line items are inappropriate for the project. (Faculty salary and computer equipment costs not allowed). Budget is attached and gives vague justification of project cost. Some line items are inappropriate for the project. (Faculty salary and computer equipment costs not allowed). Budget is attached and justifies with some clarity use of project Line items are appropriate for the project. (Faculty salary and computer equipment costs not allowed). Budget is attached and clearly justifies use of project funds. Line items are appropriate for the project. (Faculty salary and computer equipment costs not allowed). 7. Relevance to health equity No explanation of how the problem is relevant to health equity. No description of how project will advance the field of health equity research or practice. Vague description of how the problem is relevant to health equity. Unclear how project will advance the field of health equity research or practice. Somewhat describes how problem is relevant to health equity and how it advances the field of health equity research and practice. Describes the importance of addressing this problem to advance the field of health equity and practice. Clearly states how project will advance the field of health equity research or practice. 8. How the project advances the faculty member’s research No explanation of how project advances faculty member’s research or practice. Unclear explanation of how project advances faculty member’s research or practice. Explains how project advances faculty member’s research or practice with some detail. Explains well how project advances faculty member’s research or practice. POINTS FOR ALL DOMAINS (range 8-32)
Applicant%20Rubric_0.docx