presented the revised drawing to the Board, pointing out the changes. Mr. Arenson inquired if there would be any trucks parked behind the building. The representative stated no. Mr. Arenson inquired if there was any lighting behind the building. The representative stated no. Mr. Arenson inquired to Staff if they could add buildings to the site in the future. Staff stated yes. There was discussion regarding the applicant wanting to decrease the amount of curb, gutter and asphalt on the site, which prompted moving the building forward to save cost. Motion: Approve the application as submitted., Moved by Joel Arenson, Seconded by Tom Risso. Mr. Arenson inquired about the location. The representative stated it was Discussion: still in the same location. Vote: All voted in favor. (summary: Yes = 5). New Business Major Applications – Agape Hospice Site Design, Landscaping, Elevations, Lighting, Materials – Ms. Cindy Wright, the Architect and representative, presented the application, materials, plans and color samples to the Board. She highlighted the project stating it would consist of a 30-bed unit facility, noted the dumpster enclosure, landscaping plan with foundation plantings around the building, storm water pond, and street side. Ms. Wright added that there was also landscaping designated at the rear. She presented a color rendering, and photograph to the Board. Ms. Wright then presented the lighting plan to the Board, to include a photometrics plan and the light fixture of choice. There was discussion about the location within the City of Goose Creek boundaries. Ms. Browder showed an overhead, and pointed out the location. Motion: Approve the application as submitted., Moved by Joel Arenson, Seconded by Gary Becker. Discussion: Chairperson Clopton thanked the Architect for the presentation. Vote: All voted in favor. (summary: Yes = 5). Alliance Offices Phase II Site Design, Landscaping, Elevations, Lighting, – – Materials The representative presented photo’s, the application, material and color samples to the Board. He explained the building would mimic the existing building, and noted the underground storage for storm water. Mr. Arenson inquired about the specifics of the underground retention. The representative stated that the plans were included, and noted they chose this option to utilize more of the land, in lieu of a surface pond. There was discussion about the detention system, and the approval of the storm water. Chairperson Clopton inquired if this building would have the same features. The representative stated yes.
presented the revised drawing to the Board, pointing out the changes. Mr. Arenson inquired if there would be any trucks parked behind the building. The representative stated no. Mr. Arenson inquired if there was any lighting behind the building. The representative stated no. Mr. Arenson inquired to Staff if they could add buildings to the site in the future. Staff stated yes. There was discussion regarding the applicant wanting to decrease the amount of curb, gutter and asphalt on the site, which prompted moving the building forward to save cost. Motion: Approve the application as submitted., Moved by Joel Arenson, Seconded by Tom Risso. Discussion: Mr. Arenson inquired about the location. The representative stated it was still in the same location. Vote: All voted in favor. (summary: Yes = 5). New Business – Major Applications Agape Hospice – Site Design, Landscaping, Elevations, Lighting, Materials Ms. Cindy Wright, the Architect and representative, presented the application, materials, plans and color samples to the Board. She highlighted the project stating it would consist of a 30-bed unit facility, noted the dumpster enclosure, landscaping plan with foundation plantings around the building, storm water pond, and street side. Ms. Wright added that there was also landscaping designated at the rear. She presented a color rendering, and photograph to the Board. Ms. Wright then presented the lighting plan to the Board, to include a photometrics plan and the light fixture of choice. There was discussion about the location within the City of Goose Creek boundaries. Ms. Browder showed an overhead, and pointed out the location. Motion: Approve the application as submitted., Moved by Joel Arenson, Seconded by Gary Becker. Discussion: Chairperson Clopton thanked the Architect for the presentation. Vote: All voted in favor. (summary: Yes = 5). Alliance Offices – Phase II – Site Design, Landscaping, Elevations, Lighting, Materials The representative presented photo’s, the application, material and color samples to the Board. He explained the building would mimic the existing building, and noted the underground storage for storm water. Mr. Arenson inquired about the specifics of the underground retention. The representative stated that the plans were included, and noted they chose this option to utilize more of the land, in lieu of a surface pond. There was discussion about the detention system, and the approval of the storm water. Chairperson Clopton inquired if this building would have the same features. The representative stated yes.
ARB%20Minutes%2011_20_17.docx