Corporal punishment is effective human body, being a common economically. Proponents of corporal means of self-discipline. This had an punishment offer several advantages influence on the use of corporal over other forms of punishment. punishment in schools, as Corporal punishment is quicker to educational establishments were implement, costs nothing, and deters closely attached to the church during unruliness. Quicker implementation this period. Nevertheless, corporal means that school officials can turn punishment was not used uncritically. their attention to other important It wasn’t until the eleventh century matters. Schools who implement the when opponents to corporal use of corporal punishment save punishment began speaking out thousands of dollars every year. They against the use of corporal argue that there is a difference punishment in the treatment of between the use of physical force by children. Many of these attitudes and authorities such as teachers, and beliefs still survive today. private citizens using physical force Summary: to meet their own ends. At a time of limited money and resources, corporal punishment was Figure 2: The Hypocrisy of Corporal the only logical means of Punishment. punishment. But the abundance of Source: money and resources during modern Corporal punishment is still times should call for an end to allowed because of deep rooted corporal punishment’s harsh methods moral reasons. It was encouraged by of disciplining children. the attitudes of the towards the Case Study 2: The Policies of Opponents of Zero Tolerance Purpose of Zero Tolerance district wide policies to mandate harsh and pre-determined Zero tolerance policies were punishments for a wide variety of first enacted as a way to enforce offenses, but zero-tolerance policies suspension and expulsion policies in have proven to be effective in response to drugs, weapons, and keeping schools safe, especially in violent acts in schools. Critics of areas where violence is a major zero-tolerance policies argue that problem. these policies have come to mean
Corporal punishment is effective economically. Proponents of corporal punishment offer several advantages over other forms of punishment. Corporal punishment is quicker to implement, costs nothing, and deters unruliness. Quicker implementation means that school officials can turn their attention to other important matters. Schools who implement the use of corporal punishment save thousands of dollars every year. They argue that there is a difference between the use of physical force by authorities such as teachers, and private citizens using physical force to meet their own ends. Figure 2: The Hypocrisy of Corporal Punishment. Source: Corporal punishment is still allowed because of deep rooted moral reasons. It was encouraged by the attitudes of the towards the human body, being a common means of self-discipline. This had an influence on the use of corporal punishment in schools, as educational establishments were closely attached to the church during this period. Nevertheless, corporal punishment was not used uncritically. It wasn’t until the eleventh century when opponents to corporal punishment began speaking out against the use of corporal punishment in the treatment of children. Many of these attitudes and beliefs still survive today. Summary: At a time of limited money and resources, corporal punishment was the only logical means of punishment. But the abundance of money and resources during modern times should call for an end to corporal punishment’s harsh methods of disciplining children. Case Study 2: The Policies of Opponents of Zero Tolerance Purpose of Zero Tolerance Zero tolerance policies were first enacted as a way to enforce suspension and expulsion policies in response to drugs, weapons, and violent acts in schools. Critics of zero-tolerance policies argue that these policies have come to mean district wide policies to mandate harsh and pre-determined punishments for a wide variety of offenses, but zero-tolerance policies have proven to be effective in keeping schools safe, especially in areas where violence is a major problem.
analyticalreport.docx