Table 3 Key indicators, according to peer group, remoteness and funding type Surgical Compliance with with Number of Indication with with of guidelines: guidelines: guidelines: guidelines: Appropriate Not Not Not Inappropriate (%) >24 hours Compliant (%) assessable (%) available assessable (%) (%)a (%) (%) (%) (%) Peer group (public 54 8 633 72.3 46.1 58.7 22.3 13.5 5.4 71.1 23.4 5.5 hospitals only): A Peer (public 20 1 266 77.0 45.0 59.9 26.2 6.4 7.4 71.0 22.5 6.5 hospitals only): B Peer (public 25 1 129 65.6 13.3 65.0 24.0 3.1 7.9 71.6 20.8 7.6 hospitals only): C Peer group (public 22 605 70.8 53.9b 66.6 23.8 5.1 4.5 73.7 22.7 3.6 hospitals only): D Peer group (public 10 120 87.9 No data 65 20 5.8 9.2 64.2 24.2 11.7 hospitals only): E
Table 3 Key indicators, according to peer group, remoteness and funding type of Number of Indication (%) Surgical >24 hours (%)a with guidelines: Compliant (%) Compliance with guidelines: (%) with guidelines: Not available (%) with guidelines: Not assessable (%) Appropriate (%) Inappropriate (%) Not assessable (%) Peer group (public hospitals only): A 54 8 633 72.3 46.1 58.7 22.3 13.5 5.4 71.1 23.4 5.5 Peer (public hospitals only): B 20 1 266 77.0 45.0 59.9 26.2 6.4 7.4 71.0 22.5 6.5 Peer (public hospitals only): C 25 1 129 65.6 13.3 65.0 24.0 3.1 7.9 71.6 20.8 7.6 Peer group (public hospitals only): D 22 605 70.8 53.9b 66.6 23.8 5.1 4.5 73.7 22.7 3.6 Peer group (public hospitals only): E 10 120 87.9 No data 65 20 5.8 9.2 64.2 24.2 11.7
Antimicrobial-Prescribing-Practice-in-Australia-Results-of-the-2013-National-Antimicrobial-Prescribing-Survey.docx