76.The use of the term in criterion f) is an inappropriate value judgment and “good’ unnecessary. RECOMMENDATION 6 the definition of live-work units in footnote 15 as follows: The dual use of a purpose built or converted building as a combination of “ dwelling and business space as defined by Class B1 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987. The ratio of uses in floor space terms must be relatively equal. ” Delete criterion d). In criterion f) delete and insert in its “Good” “The” Policy EC6 Raising the leisure and tourism profile of the town 77.This policy supports tourism development with none of the qualifications applied in Core Strategy policy CS.24 and Leisure Development”. It is therefore “Tourism contrary to basic conditions and should be deleted. 78.It is possible to retain a reference to the desire to promote tourism as part of the economic strategy in the Plan but this should be limited to a cross reference to the Core Strategy policy. This can be achieved in an amended form of policy EC7. RECOMMENDATION 7 Delete EC6”. “Policy Policy EC7 A better location for visitor and tourism information 79.The need to site such development within the town centre area, as defined on the policies map, should be more explicit. 80.The desire to promote tourism as referred to in the policy EC 6 could be “deleted” re-asserted in the Explanation section. RECOMMENDATION 8 In the policy, delete town centre”, add at the end of the sentence “new “within the town centre boundary highlighted on the policies map.”
76.The use of the term “good’ in criterion f) is an inappropriate value judgment and unnecessary. RECOMMENDATION 6 the definition of live-work units in footnote 15 as follows: “ The dual use of a purpose built or converted building as a combination of dwelling and business space as defined by Class B1 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987. The ratio of uses in floor space terms must be relatively equal. ” Delete criterion d). In criterion f) delete “Good” and insert “The” in its Policy EC6 Raising the leisure and tourism profile of the town 77.This policy supports tourism development with none of the qualifications applied in Core Strategy policy CS.24 “Tourism and Leisure Development”. It is therefore contrary to basic conditions and should be deleted. 78.It is possible to retain a reference to the desire to promote tourism as part of the economic strategy in the Plan but this should be limited to a cross reference to the Core Strategy policy. This can be achieved in an amended form of policy EC7. RECOMMENDATION 7 Delete “Policy EC6”. Policy EC7 A better location for visitor and tourism information 79.The need to site such development within the town centre area, as defined on the policies map, should be more explicit. 80.The desire to promote tourism as referred to in the “deleted” policy EC 6 could be re-asserted in the Explanation section. RECOMMENDATION 8 In the policy, delete “new town centre”, add at the end of the sentence “within the town centre boundary highlighted on the policies map.”
Appendix%202%20Shipston%20Examiners%20Report.docx