= 3 Proficient = 4 Exemplary Figure 17 shows an example of how a cumulative summative rating will be calculated. Figure 17: Example of Weighted Calculations Principal Performance Performance Weighted Standard Rating Points Weight (Points x Weight) Standard 1 Exemplary 4 1 4 1 Standard 2 Proficient 3 3 1 Standard 3 Proficient 3 3 1 Standard 4 Proficient 3 3 1 Standard 5 Proficient 3 3 1 Standard 6 Exemplary 4 4 Standard 7 Exemplary 4 4 16 Cumulative Summative Rating 36 The overall summative rating will be judged as exemplary, proficient, developing/needs or using the following range of scores: improvement, unacceptable = 10 19 Unacceptable – = 20 25 Developing/Needs Improvement – = 26 34 Proficient – = 35 40 Exemplary – Regardless of the overall total points earned, three or more Note: developing/needs improvement ratings on individual performance standards will result in an overall rating of developing/needs or Similarly, one rating on any one performance improvement unacceptable. unacceptable standard may result in an overall rating. unacceptable Evaluation Schedule Summative evaluations are to be completed before the last week of school for all contract types. Figure 18 details the evaluation schedules for all components of the evaluation system. If non-renewal of a teacher is anticipated, the summative evaluation ideally occurs at least one semester prior to the end of school year, provided that the teacher has had an opportunity to complete all of the Improvement Plan activities (described in the next section of this Handbook). All teachers on continuing contract receive a summative evaluation every third year. They receive interim evaluations near the end of years one and two of their evaluation cycle. Unannounced observations, student surveys, and Goal Setting for Student Progress are done
Proficient = 3 Exemplary = 4 Figure 17 shows an example of how a cumulative summative rating will be calculated. Figure 17: Example of Weighted Calculations Principal Performance Standard Performance Rating Points Weight Weighted (Points x Weight) Standard 1 Exemplary 4 1 4 Standard 2 Proficient 3 1 3 Standard 3 Proficient 3 1 3 Standard 4 Proficient 3 1 3 Standard 5 Proficient 3 1 3 Standard 6 Exemplary 4 1 4 Standard 7 Exemplary 4 4 16 Cumulative Summative Rating 36 The overall summative rating will be judged as exemplary, proficient, developing/needs improvement, or unacceptable using the following range of scores: Unacceptable = 10 – 19 Developing/Needs Improvement = 20 – 25 Proficient = 26 – 34 Exemplary = 35 – 40 Note: Regardless of the overall total points earned, three or more developing/needs improvement ratings on individual performance standards will result in an overall rating of developing/needs improvement or unacceptable. Similarly, one unacceptable rating on any one performance standard may result in an overall unacceptable rating. Evaluation Schedule Summative evaluations are to be completed before the last week of school for all contract types. Figure 18 details the evaluation schedules for all components of the evaluation system. If non-renewal of a teacher is anticipated, the summative evaluation ideally occurs at least one semester prior to the end of school year, provided that the teacher has had an opportunity to complete all of the Improvement Plan activities (described in the next section of this Handbook). All teachers on continuing contract receive a summative evaluation every third year. They receive interim evaluations near the end of years one and two of their evaluation cycle. Unannounced observations, student surveys, and Goal Setting for Student Progress are done
appendix_d_yourtown_teacher_eval_handbook.docx