114 J. Gen. Psychol. 129 (1987). B. Michael Dann & George Logan III, 79 Judicature 280 Jury Reform: The Arizona Experience, (1996). B. Michael Dann., "Learning Lessons" and "Speaking Rights": Creating Educated and 68 Ind. L.J. 1229 (1993). Democratic Juries, B. Michael Dann et al., Can Jury Innovations Improve Juror Understanding of DNA Champion, April 27, 2007, at 26. Evidence?, Dennis J. Devine et al., Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating 7 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 622 (2001). Groups, Shari Seidman Diamond, How Jurors Deal with Expert Testimony and How Judges Can Help, 16 J.L. & Pol’y 47 (2007). Shari Seidman Diamond, 54 Buff. L. Beyond Fantasy and Nightmare: A Portrait of the Jury, Rev. 717 (2006). Shari Seidman Diamond, Beth Murphy & Mary R. Rose, The of Law” in Real Jury “Kettleful 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1537 (2012). Deliberations: Successes, Failures, and Next Steps, Shari Seidman Diamond et al., 59 Juror Questions During Trial: A Window into Juror Thinking, Vand. L. Rev. 1927 (2006). Seidman Diamond et al., Juror Discussions During Civil Trials: Studying an Arizona 45 Ariz. L. Rev. 1 (2003). Innovation, Shari Seidman Diamond & Neil Vidmar, 87 Va. Jury Room Ruminations on Forbidden Topics, L. Rev. 1857 (2001). Bethany K. Dumas, Jury Trials: Lay Jurors, Pattern Jury Instructions, and Comprehension 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 701 (2000). Issues, Amiram Elwork et al., 1 Law & Juridic Decisions: In Ignorance of the Law or in Light of It?, Hum. Behav. 163 (1977). Amiram Elwork et al., Making Jury Instructions Understandable (1982). Victor E. Flango, 63 Judicature 436 Would Jurors Do a Better Job if They Could Take Notes?,
114 J. Gen. Psychol. 129 (1987). B. Michael Dann & George Logan III, Jury Reform: The Arizona Experience, 79 Judicature 280 (1996). B. Michael Dann., "Learning Lessons" and "Speaking Rights": Creating Educated and Democratic Juries, 68 Ind. L.J. 1229 (1993). B. Michael Dann et al., Can Jury Innovations Improve Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence?, Champion, April 27, 2007, at 26. Dennis J. Devine et al., Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups, 7 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 622 (2001). Shari Seidman Diamond, How Jurors Deal with Expert Testimony and How Judges Can Help, 16 J.L. & Pol’y 47 (2007). Shari Seidman Diamond, Beyond Fantasy and Nightmare: A Portrait of the Jury, 54 Buff. L. Rev. 717 (2006). Shari Seidman Diamond, Beth Murphy & Mary R. Rose, The “Kettleful of Law” in Real Jury Deliberations: Successes, Failures, and Next Steps, 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1537 (2012). Shari Seidman Diamond et al., Juror Questions During Trial: A Window into Juror Thinking, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1927 (2006). Seidman Diamond et al., Juror Discussions During Civil Trials: Studying an Arizona Innovation, 45 Ariz. L. Rev. 1 (2003). Shari Seidman Diamond & Neil Vidmar, Jury Room Ruminations on Forbidden Topics, 87 Va. L. Rev. 1857 (2001). Bethany K. Dumas, Jury Trials: Lay Jurors, Pattern Jury Instructions, and Comprehension Issues, 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 701 (2000). Amiram Elwork et al., Juridic Decisions: In Ignorance of the Law or in Light of It?, 1 Law & Hum. Behav. 163 (1977). Amiram Elwork et al., Making Jury Instructions Understandable (1982). Victor E. Flango, Would Jurors Do a Better Job if They Could Take Notes?, 63 Judicature 436
Appendices_compiled_2018.docx