What evidence is there to assess the effectiveness of evaluation frameworks Paper selection developed for these programs? After conducting searches, studies identified by a screen of title and abstract were evaluated against inclusion and exclusion criteria listed in Table 2.1. Search strategy Table 2.1: Inclusion and exclusion criteria Relevant literature was sourced through systematic searches of databases, Included: Excluded: including MedLine (PubMed), PsychINFO, Cochrane library and Google Scholar, as well as pertinent journals including Internet Interventions and the Journal of Internationally and locally published Non-English papers Medical Internet Research. research studies Papers where full text was not readily Research papers that were published available Search terms from 1995 to 2015 Validation studies Published book chapters, government Animal studies Search terms using the Title/s, Abstract/s and Keywords lists included: reports and government websites Grey literature (e.g.,Media: Suicide OR self-harm OR depression OR anxiety OR trauma OR stigma OR Trials with outcome data that assessed websites, newspapers, alcohol OR abuse” OR drug OR abuse” OR OR research outcome (e.g., depression, “alcohol “drug “self-harm” magazines, television, conference wellbeing OR social AND health seeking behaviour) abstracts, theses) English language papers Indigenous OR Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander OR Maori OR First Literature which did not include “Suicide” Nations OR Aboriginal OR Inuit OR American Indian OR Native American OR OR Torres Strait Islander “Aboriginal Alaskan Native OR adults OR youth OR adolescents OR colonization OR people / Indigenous Australians” colonisation OR racism AND Information management prevention OR postvention OR promotion OR program OR policy OR intervention OR education OR strategy OR resource OR support OR social A screening process was adopted to code the eligibility of papers acquired through media OR applications” OR health” AND “mobile “mobile the literature search. All records that were identified through the literature search Evaluation OR Framework” OR efficacy OR effectiveness OR “Evaluation were screened for relevance against the inclusion criteria, and then processed engagement OR outcome OR monitoring OR implementation OR using Microsoft Excel. Initial screening for inclusion was performed by one acceptability reviewer, and was based on the information contained in the title and abstract. Full text versions of all studies which satisfied this initial screening were obtained. In screening the full text paper, the reviewer made the decision on whether the paper should be included or excluded, based on the pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
What evidence is there to assess the effectiveness of evaluation frameworks developed for these programs? Search strategy Relevant literature was sourced through systematic searches of databases, including MedLine (PubMed), PsychINFO, Cochrane library and Google Scholar, as well as pertinent journals including Internet Interventions and the Journal of Medical Internet Research. Search terms Search terms using the Title/s, Abstract/s and Keywords lists included: Suicide OR self-harm OR depression OR anxiety OR trauma OR stigma OR alcohol OR “alcohol abuse” OR drug OR “drug abuse” OR “self-harm” OR wellbeing OR social AND Indigenous OR Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander OR Maori OR First Nations OR Aboriginal OR Inuit OR American Indian OR Native American OR Alaskan Native OR adults OR youth OR adolescents OR colonization OR colonisation OR racism AND prevention OR postvention OR promotion OR program OR policy OR intervention OR education OR strategy OR resource OR support OR social media OR “mobile applications” OR “mobile health” AND Evaluation OR “Evaluation Framework” OR efficacy OR effectiveness OR engagement OR outcome OR monitoring OR implementation OR acceptability Paper selection After conducting searches, studies identified by a screen of title and abstract were evaluated against inclusion and exclusion criteria listed in Table 2.1. Table 2.1: Inclusion and exclusion criteria Included: Excluded: Internationally and locally published research studies Research papers that were published from 1995 to 2015 Published book chapters, government reports and government websites Trials with outcome data that assessed research outcome (e.g., depression, health seeking behaviour) English language papers Non-English papers Papers where full text was not readily available Validation studies Animal studies Grey literature (e.g.,Media: websites, newspapers, magazines, television, conference abstracts, theses) Literature which did not include “Suicide” OR “Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander people / Indigenous Australians” Information management A screening process was adopted to code the eligibility of papers acquired through the literature search. All records that were identified through the literature search were screened for relevance against the inclusion criteria, and then processed using Microsoft Excel. Initial screening for inclusion was performed by one reviewer, and was based on the information contained in the title and abstract. Full text versions of all studies which satisfied this initial screening were obtained. In screening the full text paper, the reviewer made the decision on whether the paper should be included or excluded, based on the pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
ATSISPEP-Suicide-Prevention-Literature-Review.docx