approval”. This is incorrect in 2 ways: the application was refused, not approved; the Parish Council objected, it did not support. What is different now? Explanation Second paragraph there is not a target for the village set out in the Core – – Strategy. Policy H3 Strategic Reserve: – Policy H3: identification of this strategic reserve site needs to be rigorous in order to stand up to scrutiny at Examination, i.e. sites need to be suitable, available and achievable - and preferable to other sites that have been put forward. There are constraints of developing Herberts Farm bearing in mind it is partially in a Conservation Area and has listed buildings on site. The text from the 3rd sentence to the end would appear more applicable to Policy H2 and perhaps should be repositioned there? Is this still a working farm? If so, is it the farm mentioned on p.9 of the NDP where it indicates that it is at the heart of the village? The re-development of this site would presumably lead to the closure and loss of the farm, which would no longer form heart of the village’… If it is ‘the a functioning farm, what are the reasons for promoting it for such alternative development? How does this re-development stack up against landscape protection policies and employment/business protection policies? Replace with on fourth line of policy. The sentence beginning sites in this ‘their’ ‘its’ ‘The category…’ is a note and should not form part of the policy itself. Additionally, it is a single site, not multiple sites. Second paragraph should begin: on this allocated site…’. ‘Development Criterion c) should read: access and egress from the local highway network, plus ‘Safe adequate parking arrangements; and’. Policy H4 Rural Exception Housing: – Would a more appropriate policy title be: Housing’? The first paragraph should be ‘Affordable replaced, to read: community-led housing schemes on sites beyond, but adjacent ‘Small-scale to, the defined built-up area boundary of the village will be supported where the following is demonstrated:…’. In criterion b) replace Local Service Village…’ with built-up area boundary…’. ‘…Tysoe’s ‘…the Second paragraph what is open book development appraisal’? – ‘an Explanation (p.24) in paragraph beginning of the 2011…’ on the second line, – ‘Analysis replace Council’ with wider District’. ‘District ‘the
approval”. This is incorrect in 2 ways: the application was refused, not approved; the Parish Council objected, it did not support. What is different now? Explanation – Second paragraph – there is not a target for the village set out in the Core Strategy. Policy H3 – Strategic Reserve: Policy H3: identification of this strategic reserve site needs to be rigorous in order to stand up to scrutiny at Examination, i.e. sites need to be suitable, available and achievable - and preferable to other sites that have been put forward. There are constraints of developing Herberts Farm bearing in mind it is partially in a Conservation Area and has listed buildings on site. The text from the 3rd sentence to the end would appear more applicable to Policy H2 and perhaps should be repositioned there? Is this still a working farm? If so, is it the farm mentioned on p.9 of the NDP where it indicates that it is at the heart of the village? The re-development of this site would presumably lead to the closure and loss of the farm, which would no longer form ‘the heart of the village’… If it is a functioning farm, what are the reasons for promoting it for such alternative development? How does this re-development stack up against landscape protection policies and employment/business protection policies? Replace ‘their’ with ‘its’ on fourth line of policy. The sentence beginning ‘The sites in this category…’ is a note and should not form part of the policy itself. Additionally, it is a single site, not multiple sites. Second paragraph should begin: ‘Development on this allocated site…’. Criterion c) should read: ‘Safe access and egress from the local highway network, plus adequate parking arrangements; and’. Policy H4 – Rural Exception Housing: Would a more appropriate policy title be: ‘Affordable Housing’? The first paragraph should be replaced, to read: ‘Small-scale community-led housing schemes on sites beyond, but adjacent to, the defined built-up area boundary of the village will be supported where the following is demonstrated:…’. In criterion b) replace ‘…Tysoe’s Local Service Village…’ with ‘…the built-up area boundary…’. Second paragraph – what is ‘an open book development appraisal’? Explanation (p.24) – in paragraph beginning ‘Analysis of the 2011…’ on the second line, replace ‘District Council’ with ‘the wider District’.
Appendix%201%20-%20Tysoe%20-%20SDC%20Comments%20on%20pre-sub%20NDP%202%2018.7.17.docx