Exponential4 13.76 5.34 0.07 0.07 0.76 1204.4 -0.12 0.06 Exponential5 13.76 2.34 0.07 0.07 0.76 1204.4 -0.12 0.06 Hill 12.37 2.52 0.07 0.07 0.86 1204.4 -0.08 0.02 Linear 11.61 8.88 0.07 0.07 0.34 1204.5 0.55 0.86 Polynomial 11.61 8.88 0.07 0.07 0.34 1204.5 0.55 0.86 Polynomial 11.61 8.88 0.07 0.07 0.34 1204.5 0.55 0.86 Power 11.61 8.88 0.07 0.07 0.34 1204.5 0.55 0.86 a Because the results of tests 2 and 3 indicated that the variance was not fit well (p<0.10), BMDs were also estimated using a modeled (non-constant) variance. Modeling the variance did not improve the fit of the variance model (Test 3 p = 0.03).
Exponential4 13.76 5.34 0.07 0.07 0.76 1204.4 -0.12 0.06 Exponential5 13.76 2.34 0.07 0.07 0.76 1204.4 -0.12 0.06 Hill 12.37 2.52 0.07 0.07 0.86 1204.4 -0.08 0.02 Linear 11.61 8.88 0.07 0.07 0.34 1204.5 0.55 0.86 Polynomial 11.61 8.88 0.07 0.07 0.34 1204.5 0.55 0.86 Polynomial 11.61 8.88 0.07 0.07 0.34 1204.5 0.55 0.86 Power 11.61 8.88 0.07 0.07 0.34 1204.5 0.55 0.86 a Because the results of tests 2 and 3 indicated that the variance was not fit well (p<0.10), BMDs were also estimated using a modeled (non-constant) variance. Modeling the variance did not improve the fit of the variance model (Test 3 p = 0.03).
1-s2.0-S0273230017300697-mmc1.docx