Indigenous of human conservation Statement of remote clearly outline related to and well-being, issues across Principles on communities its own Fisheries Traditional that are WWF’s global Indigenous without access processes for Crime. Peoples and related to but network. No People and to mail or due diligence of Protected not directly specific human Conservation. Process is partners. Areas grounded in, rights focus. It has also not 3. Gender human rights produced anonymous. policy Guidelines on 4. Policy on FPIC in relation Poverty and to REDD+. Conservation Fauna and References No FFI’s guide to Conservation, FFI has FFI has Human rights No Flora CIHR information social impact Livelihoods and produced a produced a are investigated information International FFI’s position on human assessment is Governance series of factsheet on during FFI’s on statement on rights specific one of its programme grievance corporate due advocating “lessons Conservation, policies. that supports learned from mechanisms in diligence for “lessons Livelihoods learned from FFI staff to REDD+” fact the context of processes rights with and REDD+” work effectively sheets that are REDD+ forest include human government Governance documents. with local relevant to schemes. No rights review. partners. commits to people and to human rights, details on the No details respecting Uses understand and and include application of available for human rights. Sustainable integrate their guidance on grievance any of these Livelihoods needs and free, prior and mechanisms in review Approach rights within informed practice, processes. – related, but conservation consent. especially not not based on initiatives. No in relation to human rights specific fisheries. framework. reference to human rights. FFI has produced a series of
Indigenous and Traditional Peoples and Protected Areas 3. Gender policy 4. Policy on Poverty and Conservation of human well-being, that are related to but not directly grounded in, human rights conservation issues across WWF’s global network. No specific human rights focus. Statement of Principles on Indigenous People and Conservation. It has produced Guidelines on FPIC in relation to REDD+. remote communities without access to mail or Process is also not anonymous. clearly outline its own processes for due diligence of partners. related to Fisheries Crime. Fauna and Flora International References CIHR FFI’s position statement on Conservation, Livelihoods and Governance commits to respecting human rights. No information on human rights specific policies. FFI’s guide to social impact assessment is one of its “lessons learned from REDD+” documents. Uses Sustainable Livelihoods Approach – related, but not based on human rights framework. Conservation, Livelihoods and Governance programme that supports FFI staff to work effectively with local people and to understand and integrate their needs and rights within conservation initiatives. No specific reference to human rights. FFI has produced a series of FFI has produced a series of “lessons learned from REDD+” fact sheets that are relevant to human rights, and include guidance on free, prior and informed consent. FFI has produced a factsheet on grievance mechanisms in the context of REDD+ forest schemes. No details on the application of grievance mechanisms in practice, especially not in relation to fisheries. Human rights are investigated during FFI’s corporate due diligence processes include human rights review. No details available for any of these review processes. No information on advocating for rights with government partners.
1-s2.0-S0308597X17302762-mmc1.docx