Comments: 3.1 1 2 3 (Target) 4 Advanced Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Knowledge of essentially no depth of limited depth of sufficient depth of exceptional depth of Curriculum, knowledge/understanding knowledge/understanding knowledge/understanding knowledge/understanding Instruction, of curriculum content, of curriculum content, of curriculum content, of curriculum content, and instructional practices, instructional practices, instructional practices, instructional practices, Assessment and assessment and assessment and assessment and assessment principles. principles. principles. principles. Program Admission Criterion #3 Comments: 6.1 1 2 3 (Target) 4 Problem Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Solving essentially no knowledge limited knowledge of sufficient knowledge of exceptional knowledge of of how to monitor how to monitor how to monitor how to monitor Organizational organizational organizational organizational organizational Performance performance and modify performance and modify performance and modify performance and modify structures to contribute structures to match the structures to match the structures to match the the school’s school’s improvement school’s improvement school’s improvement Program improvement effort. efforts. efforts. efforts. Evaluation Criterion #6 Comments: 6.2 1 2 3 (Target) 4 Problem Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Solving essentially no depth of limited depth of sufficient of exceptional depth of knowledge/understanding knowledge/understanding knowledge/understanding knowledge/understanding of principles of program of principles of program of principles of program of principles of program Evaluation evaluation and how to tie evaluation and how to tie evaluation and how to tie evaluation and how to tie these results into these results into these results into these results into subsequent cycles of subsequent cycles of subsequent cycles of subsequent cycles of Program continuous improvement. continuous improvement. continuous improvement. continuous improvement. Admission criterion #6 Comments: Signature: __________________________________________ Date: ______________________ THIS RECOMMENDATION RATING FORM AND A LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION SHOULD BE COMPLETED, PLACED IN A SEALED ENVELOPE, AND RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT.
Comments: 3.1 Advanced Knowledge of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Program Admission Criterion #3 1 Candidate demonstrates essentially no depth of knowledge/understanding of curriculum content, instructional practices, and assessment principles. 2 Candidate demonstrates limited depth of knowledge/understanding of curriculum content, instructional practices, and assessment principles. 3 (Target) Candidate demonstrates sufficient depth of knowledge/understanding of curriculum content, instructional practices, and assessment principles. 4 Candidate demonstrates exceptional depth of knowledge/understanding of curriculum content, instructional practices, and assessment principles. Comments: 6.1 Problem Solving Performance Program Evaluation Criterion #6 1 Candidate demonstrates essentially no knowledge of how to monitor organizational performance and modify structures to contribute the school’s improvement effort. 2 Candidate demonstrates limited knowledge of how to monitor organizational performance and modify structures to match the school’s improvement efforts. 3 (Target) Candidate demonstrates sufficient knowledge of how to monitor organizational performance and modify structures to match the school’s improvement efforts. 4 Candidate demonstrates exceptional knowledge of how to monitor organizational performance and modify structures to match the school’s improvement efforts. Comments: 6.2 Problem Solving Evaluation Program Admission criterion #6 1 Candidate demonstrates essentially no depth of knowledge/understanding of principles of program evaluation and how to tie these results into subsequent cycles of continuous improvement. 2 Candidate demonstrates limited depth of knowledge/understanding of principles of program evaluation and how to tie these results into subsequent cycles of continuous improvement. 3 (Target) Candidate demonstrates sufficient of knowledge/understanding of principles of program evaluation and how to tie these results into subsequent cycles of continuous improvement. 4 Candidate demonstrates exceptional depth of knowledge/understanding of principles of program evaluation and how to tie these results into subsequent cycles of continuous improvement. Comments: Signature: __________________________________________ Date: ______________________ THIS RECOMMENDATION RATING FORM AND A LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION SHOULD BE COMPLETED, PLACED IN A SEALED ENVELOPE, AND RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. Organizational
application_principal-prep-program.docx