Mental Component 50.6 (10.8) 48.4 (11.5) 0.16* Exercise = Usual care Score Footnotes Short Form-36 (SF-36); QLMI=Quality of Life After Myocardial Infarction questionnaire; AP-QLQ=Angina Pectoris-Quality of Life questionnaire; NR=not reported; NS=not significant * Calculated by authors of this report on independent two group t test. ** Adjusted for baseline difference between groups. Exercise = Usual care: no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between exercise and usual care groups at follow up Exercise > care: statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between exercise and usual care groups at follow up NS*: The authors of this review have inferred a P value of > 0.05 based either on the 95% CI, or from narrative in the paper, rather than from directly observing the P-value. eTable 4. Summary of costs of exercise-based rehabilitation and usual care Kovoor Author/ Hambrecht Maddison Marchionni Oldridge Briffa 2005 2006/Hall Yu 2004 2004 2014 2003 1991/93 year 2002 Follow-up 12 12 12 6 14 12 24 (months) Year of NR (€; 2000 1991 1998 ($Aus) NR 1999 ($AUD) 2003 ($USD) (currency) Euros) ($USD) ($USD) Cost of rehabilitation Mean $694 NR $394 $5246 $670 NR €127 cost/patient Costs Details of NR NR NR space, considered costed equipment, elements counseling, staff, not provided education, literature patient travel resources, NR operating costs, parking, patients costs Total healthcare costs Rehabilitation $3708 ± mean $4937 NR NR $17 272 NR $15 292 156 cost/patient Usual care $6086 ± mean $4541 NR NR $12 433 NR $15 707 370 cost/patient Absolute difference in $395 -$2378 NR NR $4839 $480 -$415 mean cost/patient* P value for P > 0.05 (see cost 0.74 P < 0.001 NR NR NR P > 0.05 below) difference
Mental Component Score 50.6 (10.8) 48.4 (11.5) 0.16* Exercise = Usual care Footnotes Short Form-36 (SF-36); QLMI=Quality of Life After Myocardial Infarction questionnaire; AP-QLQ=Angina Pectoris-Quality of Life questionnaire; NR=not reported; NS=not significant * Calculated by authors of this report on independent two group t test. ** Adjusted for baseline difference between groups. Exercise = Usual care: no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between exercise and usual care groups at follow up Exercise > care: statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between exercise and usual care groups at follow up NS*: The authors of this review have inferred a P value of > 0.05 based either on the 95% CI, or from narrative in the paper, rather than from directly observing the P-value. eTable 4. Summary of costs of exercise-based rehabilitation and usual care Author/ year Briffa 2005 Hambrecht 2004 Kovoor 2006/Hall 2002 Maddison 2014 Marchionni 2003 Oldridge 1991/93 Yu 2004 Follow-up (months) 12 12 12 6 14 12 24 Year of (currency) 1998 ($Aus) NR 1999 ($AUD) NR (€; Euros) 2000 ($USD) 1991 ($USD) 2003 ($USD) Cost of rehabilitation Mean cost/patient $694 NR $394 €127 $5246 $670 NR Costs considered Details of costed elements not provided NR counseling, education, patient travel NR NR space, equipment, staff, literature resources, operating costs, parking, patients costs NR Total healthcare costs Rehabilitation mean cost/patient $4937 $3708 ± 156 NR NR $17 272 NR $15 292 Usual care mean cost/patient $4541 $6086 ± 370 NR NR $12 433 NR $15 707 Absolute difference in mean cost/patient* $395 -$2378 NR NR $4839 $480 -$415 P value for cost difference 0.74 P < 0.001 P > 0.05 (see below) NR NR NR P > 0.05
1-s2.0-S0735109715071193-mmc1.docx