Evidence from the candidate Provide information on the evidence to be produced by the candidate in response to Describe the response format; that is, how the the task. candidate will respond to the task (e.g. oral response, written response, creating a product and/or performance demonstration) Decision-making rules List the to be used to: Instructions for making check evidence quality (i.e. the rules Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory or Competent/Not of evidence) Competent decisions (the evidence criteria) judge how well the candidate Scoring if grades and/or marks are to be performed according to the standard reported (if applicable) expected (i.e. the evidence criteria) Decision-making rules for handling multiple synthesise evidence from multiple sources of evidence across different methods sources to make an overall judgment. and/or tasks Decision-making rules for determining authenticity, currency and sufficiency of evidence Range and conditions Outline any restriction or specific conditions for the assessment such as the Location (where) location, time restrictions, assessor Time restrictions (when) qualifications, currency of evidence (e.g. Any specific assessor qualifications and/or for portfolio-based assessments), amount training required to administer the tool of supervision required to perform the task (which may assist with determining the authenticity of evidence), etc. Materials/resources required Describe access to materials, equipment, etc. that may be required to perform the Resources required by candidate task. Resources required by the assessor to administer the tool Assessor intervention Define the amount (if any) of support provided. Type and amount of intervention and/or support permitted Describe the guidelines for making Reasonable adjustments reasonable adjustments to the way Justification that the alternative procedures for evidence of performance is gathered (e.g. collecting candidate evidence does not impact on in terms of the information to be provided the standard expected by the workplace, as to the candidate and the type of evidence expressed by the relevant unit(s) of competency to be collected from the candidate) without altering the expected performance standards (as outlined in the rules). Evidence of validity Provide evidence of validity (such as face, construct, predictive, concurrent,
Evidence from the candidate Describe the response format; that is, how the candidate will respond to the task (e.g. oral response, written response, creating a product and/or performance demonstration) Provide information on the evidence to be produced by the candidate in response to the task. Decision-making rules Instructions for making Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory or Competent/Not Competent decisions (the evidence criteria) Scoring if grades and/or marks are to be reported (if applicable) Decision-making rules for handling multiple sources of evidence across different methods and/or tasks Decision-making rules for determining authenticity, currency and sufficiency of evidence List the to be used to: check evidence quality (i.e. the rules of evidence) judge how well the candidate performed according to the standard expected (i.e. the evidence criteria) synthesise evidence from multiple sources to make an overall judgment. Range and conditions Location (where) Time restrictions (when) Any specific assessor qualifications and/or training required to administer the tool Outline any restriction or specific conditions for the assessment such as the location, time restrictions, assessor qualifications, currency of evidence (e.g. for portfolio-based assessments), amount of supervision required to perform the task (which may assist with determining the authenticity of evidence), etc. Materials/resources required Resources required by candidate Resources required by the assessor to administer the tool Describe access to materials, equipment, etc. that may be required to perform the task. Assessor intervention Type and amount of intervention and/or support permitted Define the amount (if any) of support provided. Reasonable adjustments Justification that the alternative procedures for collecting candidate evidence does not impact on the standard expected by the workplace, as expressed by the relevant unit(s) of competency Describe the guidelines for making reasonable adjustments to the way evidence of performance is gathered (e.g. in terms of the information to be provided to the candidate and the type of evidence to be collected from the candidate) without altering the expected performance standards (as outlined in the rules). Evidence of validity Provide evidence of validity (such as face, construct, predictive, concurrent,
aspire-assessment-validation-report-assessment-judgment.docx