Table S1 Correlations, means and standard deviations of group evaluations, shooter bias (left, N = 102), and avoidance bias (right, N = 107) Shooter Bias Avoidance Bias Measure 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 M SD M SD 1. RT Bias 8.11 34.62 20.34 41.03 2. Response -0.03 0.30 0.21* -0.05 0.30 0.13 bias (c) 3. bias 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.13 0.16 4. Sensitivity 0.00 0.05 0.08 0.13 -0.02 0.52 -0.28 0.68 (d’) 5. German - -0.04 -0.09 0.12 -0.18 0.00 11.86 23.33 9.82 24.23 Muslim 6. German - -0.07 0.00 0.00 0.77*** -0.10 0.07 0.82*** 8.83 20.58 10.92 22.78 Turkish * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001 For correlational analyses, we computed difference scores of reaction times (RT), errors, Note. d’ and as indices of the shooter bias according to the following formulas: RTbias = (RTobject/Arab target RTobject/White target) + c, –
Table S1 Correlations, means and standard deviations of group evaluations, shooter bias (left, N = 102), and avoidance bias (right, N = 107) Shooter Bias Avoidance Bias Measure M SD 1 2 3 4 5 M SD 1 2 3 4 5 1. RT Bias 8.11 34.62 20.34 41.03 2. Response bias (c) -0.03 0.30 0.21* -0.05 0.30 0.13 3. bias 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.13 4. Sensitivity (d’) -0.02 0.52 0.00 0.05 -0.28 0.68 0.08 0.13 5. German - Muslim 11.86 23.33 -0.04 -0.09 0.12 9.82 24.23 -0.18 0.16 0.00 6. German - Turkish 8.83 20.58 -0.07 0.00 0.00 0.77*** 10.92 22.78 -0.10 0.07 0.82*** Note. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001 For correlational analyses, we computed difference scores of reaction times (RT), errors, d’ and c, as indices of the shooter bias according to the following formulas: RTbias = (RTobject/Arab target – RTobject/White target) +
1-s2.0-S0022103116303018-mmc1.docx