The data is accurate. 5.13 5.16 4.63 It is easy to generate reports with the variables for analysis. 4.50 4.52 4.21 It is easy to generate reports in the preferable format. 4.43 4.28 4.09 Sources: online district (n=8), online school survey (n=25), teacher survey (n=251) N/A = not applicable Need for Galileo As seen in 5, district staff, principals/school leadership teams strongly agreed (5.20-5.25) that the Galileo assessment system addressed an important need in their school. Teachers agreed (4.27) with this statement as well. Table 5 Mean Score on Need for Galileo Mean District School Teachers Galileo addresses an important need in the school. 5.25 5.20 4.27 Sources: online district (n=8), online school survey (n=25), teacher survey (n=251) Support for Use Training and Technology District staff agreed that ATI training and materials supported district efforts to provide teachers with the skills needed to use the system overall and to generate reports and analyze data (Table 6). To a lesser extent, ATI training supported district efforts to train teachers to develop test items and access items for formative assessment purposes. The average agreement/disagreement score ranged from 4.00 to 4.63. 6 Mean Scores on Training ATI training supports district efforts to provide teachers the necessary skills to… Mean Use the system 4.63 Develop test items 4.00 Access items for formative assessment 4.00 Generate reports 4.50 Analyze and use data to inform instruction 4.38 Source: online district survey ( n=8) As seen in 7, principals/school leadership teams agreed that the technology resources at the school were in satisfactory condition. The mean agreement/disagreement score ranged from 4.16 to 4.88. Table 7 Mean Scores on School Technology Resources Mean Scores on Training
The data is accurate. 5.13 5.16 4.63 It is easy to generate reports with the variables for analysis. 4.50 4.52 4.21 It is easy to generate reports in the preferable format. 4.43 4.28 4.09 Sources: online district (n=8), online school survey (n=25), teacher survey (n=251) N/A = not applicable Need for Galileo As seen in 5, district staff, principals/school leadership teams strongly agreed (5.20-5.25) that the Galileo assessment system addressed an important need in their school. Teachers agreed (4.27) with this statement as well. Table 5 Mean Score on Need for Galileo Mean District School Teachers Galileo addresses an important need in the school. 5.25 5.20 4.27 Sources: online district (n=8), online school survey (n=25), teacher survey (n=251) Support for Use Training and Technology District staff agreed that ATI training and materials supported district efforts to provide teachers with the skills needed to use the system overall and to generate reports and analyze data (Table 6). To a lesser extent, ATI training supported district efforts to train teachers to develop test items and access items for formative assessment purposes. The average agreement/disagreement score ranged from 4.00 to 4.63. 6 Mean Scores on Training ATI training supports district efforts to provide teachers the necessary skills to… Mean Use the system 4.63 Develop test items 4.00 Access items for formative assessment 4.00 Generate reports 4.50 Analyze and use data to inform instruction 4.38 Source: online district survey ( n=8) As seen in 7, principals/school leadership teams agreed that the technology resources at the school were in satisfactory condition. The mean agreement/disagreement score ranged from 4.16 to 4.88. Table 7 Mean Scores on School Technology Resources Mean Scores on Training
0907interim.docx