mechanisms involved and extent/degree of metabolism observed, nature, amount, and distribution of TRR in the plant tissues. Conclusion should be very high level.] REFERENCES [Cite references for other metabolism studies (if applicable). Include the EPA MRID# and PMRA# of both the study and the review (if available).] B.7.1.2 [Crop 2] MRID No. Document ID: PMRA No. Report: Report Citation Guidelines: EPA OCSPP Harmonized Test Guideline 860.1300 Nature of the Residue Plants, Livestock (August 1996) – PMRA Regulatory Directive Dir98-02 Residue Chemistry Guidelines, – Section 2 -Nature of the Residue - Plants, Livestock OECD Guideline 501 Metabolism in Crops (January 2007) GLP Compliance: [No or Significant] deviations from regulatory requirements were reported which would have an impact on the validity of the study. [If “Significant,” then explain below the deficiencies and their impact on the acceptability of the study] The [is/is not] considered scientifically acceptable. [If not acceptable, Acceptability: then explain why below] Evaluator: [Name of regulatory person who reviewed the study] [Repeat previous sections, modify as appropriate.] Template Version February 2016 –
mechanisms involved and extent/degree of metabolism observed, nature, amount, and distribution of TRR in the plant tissues. Conclusion should be very high level.] REFERENCES [Cite references for other metabolism studies (if applicable). Include the EPA MRID# and PMRA# of both the study and the review (if available).] B.7.1.2 [Crop 2] Document ID: MRID No. PMRA No. Report: Report Citation Guidelines: EPA OCSPP Harmonized Test Guideline 860.1300 Nature of the Residue – Plants, Livestock (August 1996) PMRA Regulatory Directive Dir98-02 – Residue Chemistry Guidelines, Section 2 -Nature of the Residue - Plants, Livestock OECD Guideline 501 Metabolism in Crops (January 2007) GLP Compliance: [No or Significant] deviations from regulatory requirements were reported which would have an impact on the validity of the study. [If “Significant,” then explain below the deficiencies and their impact on the acceptability of the study] Acceptability: The [is/is not] considered scientifically acceptable. [If not acceptable, then explain why below] Evaluator: [Name of regulatory person who reviewed the study] [Repeat previous sections, modify as appropriate.] Template Version – February 2016
b.7.1_plant_metabolism.docx