How could this breakout session have been improved? Breakout Session Key responses (# of instances) More time (11) 1. Less strict (2) can trainees be better prepared for “How More specific examples (2) career in science in 2017?” Positive response or no change (2) 2. More time (5) should the supply of postdocs and “How Participants from a wider range of areas graduate students be matched to demand to (2) create sustainable, secure career pathways Positive response or no change (2) for young researchers?” 3. can the funding of science research “How in Canada be structured to promote and Change to Session format and output (7) balance basic research, translational More time (5) research, and training for the next generation of scientists?“ 4. can the current system of incentives “How be fixed so that scientists and institutions Change to Session format (2) are rewarded for the behaviours that are believed to support good and sustainable science?“ What do you think FoR Vancouver should do next? Breakout Session Key responses (# of instances) Engagement of policy makers – institutions, funding bodies and 1. government (6) can trainees be better prepared for “How Include policy makers in future events career in science in 2017?” (5) Job fair (3) 2. should the supply of postdocs and “How Facilitate industry connections (5) graduate students be matched to demand to Advocacy and diffusion of information create sustainable, secure career pathways (3) for young researchers?” 3. can the funding of science research “How Engagement of policy makers – in Canada be structured to promote and institutions, funding bodies and balance basic research, translational government (3) research, and training for the next Present findings of the meeting (2) generation of scientists?“ 4. can the current system of incentives “How be fixed so that scientists and institutions Advocacy (2) are rewarded for the behaviours that are believed to support good and sustainable science?“
How could this breakout session have been improved? Breakout Session Key responses (# of instances) 1. “How can trainees be better prepared for career in science in 2017?” More time (11) Less strict (2) More specific examples (2) Positive response or no change (2) 2. “How should the supply of postdocs and graduate students be matched to demand to create sustainable, secure career pathways for young researchers?” More time (5) Participants from a wider range of areas (2) Positive response or no change (2) 3. “How can the funding of science research in Canada be structured to promote and balance basic research, translational research, and training for the next generation of scientists?“ Change to Session format and output (7) More time (5) 4. “How can the current system of incentives be fixed so that scientists and institutions are rewarded for the behaviours that are believed to support good and sustainable science?“ Change to Session format (2) What do you think FoR Vancouver should do next? Breakout Session Key responses (# of instances) 1. “How can trainees be better prepared for career in science in 2017?” Engagement of policy makers – institutions, funding bodies and government (6) Include policy makers in future events (5) Job fair (3) 2. “How should the supply of postdocs and graduate students be matched to demand to create sustainable, secure career pathways for young researchers?” Facilitate industry connections (5) Advocacy and diffusion of information (3) 3. “How can the funding of science research in Canada be structured to promote and balance basic research, translational research, and training for the next generation of scientists?“ Engagement of policy makers – institutions, funding bodies and government (3) Present findings of the meeting (2) 4. “How can the current system of incentives be fixed so that scientists and institutions are rewarded for the behaviours that are believed to support good and sustainable science?“ Advocacy (2)
b2569d00-506b-4c19-b0bf-04c70fa33365.docx