ASSESSMENT CRITERIA QUALITATIVE-BASED WORK – Level 6 Classification % Content Application of Theory Knowledge and Evidence of Reading Referencing Presentation, Understanding and Grammar and Bibliography Spelling I 80 100 Critical insightful evaluation and Extensive evidence of Exceptional knowledge Extensive evidence of Outstanding Outstanding, – synthesis of issues and material relevant and perceptive and in-depth integrating appropriate referencing and presentation, [Outstanding which includes an original and application of theory, understanding of principles supplementary sources bibliography logically and reflective approach and/or empirical results, and concepts coherently structured, Work] where applicable correct grammar and spelling I 70 79 Critical evaluation and synthesis of Clear evidence of relevant Excellent knowledge and Evidence of extensive Excellent Excellent, – issues and material which includes application of theory, depth of understanding of reading of referencing and presentation, [Excellent Work] original and reflective thinking and/or empirical results, principles and concepts supplementary sources bibliography logically structured, where applicable using correct grammar and spelling II (i) 60 69 Critical evaluation and synthesis of Evidence of relevant Comprehensive Evidence of reading a Comprehensive Good quality – issues and material application of theory knowledge and depth of range of supplementary referencing and presentation, well [Good Quality and/or empirical results, understanding of principles sources bibliography structured, using Work] where applicable and concepts correct grammar and spelling II (ii) 50 - 59 Accurate description of main Occasional relevant Appropriate knowledge Evidence of reading Adequate Orderly presentation issues and material, with some application of theory, and understanding of directed reading and referencing and and structure with critical evaluation and/or empirical results principles and concepts some supplementary bibliography acceptable grammar [Acceptable Work] applicable sources and spelling III 40 49 Limited evaluation and description Limited evidence of Basic knowledge of key Evidence of basic Limited Acceptable – of main issues and material relevant application of principles and concepts reading only referencing and presentation and [Adequate Work] theory and/or empirical only bibliography structure, grammar results and spelling Fail 35 39 Omission of some relevant No evidence of relevant Limited and/or superficial Minimal evidence of Inadequate Poor presentation and – material application of theory knowledge of key reading referencing and structure, grammar (marginal) and/or empirical results principles and concepts bibliography and spelling [Limited Work] Fail 0 34 Insufficient and largely irrelevant No evidence of application Insufficient evidence of Little or no evidence of Little or no Inadequate – material of theory and/or empirical key principles and reading referencing and presentation, [Unacceptable results concepts bibliography structure, grammar Work] and spelling
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA – QUALITATIVE-BASED WORK Level 6 Classification % Content Application of Theory Knowledge and Understanding Evidence of Reading Referencing and Bibliography Presentation, Grammar and Spelling I [Outstanding Work] 80 – 100 Critical insightful evaluation and synthesis of issues and material which includes an original and reflective approach Extensive evidence of relevant and perceptive application of theory, and/or empirical results, where applicable Exceptional knowledge and in-depth understanding of principles and concepts Extensive evidence of integrating appropriate supplementary sources Outstanding referencing and bibliography Outstanding, presentation, logically and coherently structured, correct grammar and spelling I [Excellent Work] 70 – 79 Critical evaluation and synthesis of issues and material which includes original and reflective thinking Clear evidence of relevant application of theory, and/or empirical results, where applicable Excellent knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts Evidence of extensive reading of supplementary sources Excellent referencing and bibliography Excellent, presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling II (i) [Good Quality Work] 60 – 69 Critical evaluation and synthesis of issues and material Evidence of relevant application of theory and/or empirical results, where applicable Comprehensive knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts Evidence of reading a range of supplementary sources Comprehensive referencing and bibliography Good quality presentation, well structured, using correct grammar and spelling II (ii) [Acceptable Work] 50 - 59 Accurate description of main issues and material, with some critical evaluation Occasional relevant application of theory, and/or empirical results applicable Appropriate knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts Evidence of reading directed reading and some supplementary sources Adequate referencing and bibliography Orderly presentation and structure with acceptable grammar and spelling III [Adequate Work] 40 – 49 Limited evaluation and description of main issues and material Limited evidence of relevant application of theory and/or empirical results Basic knowledge of key principles and concepts only Evidence of basic reading only Limited referencing and bibliography Acceptable presentation and structure, grammar and spelling Fail (marginal) [Limited Work] 35 – 39 Omission of some relevant material No evidence of relevant application of theory and/or empirical results Limited and/or superficial knowledge of key principles and concepts Minimal evidence of reading Inadequate referencing and bibliography Poor presentation and structure, grammar and spelling Fail [Unacceptable Work] 0 – 34 Insufficient and largely irrelevant material No evidence of application of theory and/or empirical results Insufficient evidence of key principles and concepts Little or no evidence of reading Little or no referencing and bibliography Inadequate presentation, structure, grammar and spelling
Assessment-Criteria.docx