levels of responses to Nepal Draw from one wealth. a tectonic (2015) example to hazard. NEEs: result for 2nd Use named Gujarat, lesson. Differentiate examples to India with group show how (2001), headings or let the effects Sichuan, students classify and China into their own responses to (2008) groups. Students a tectonic write up findings Economically hazard vary into two T-Tables advanced between two (effects and countries: areas of responses) contrasting Kobe, 2nd hour levels of (1985) wealth. Loma model/template Prieta, created in first California hour, students (1989), create a contrasting wealth example. It L'Aquila, could be completed (2009) as a WebQuest, or using newspaper clippings, news videos, textbook New examples or Zealand internet research. (2011) 3rd hour
levels of wealth. responses to a tectonic hazard. Use named examples to show how the effects and responses to a tectonic hazard vary between two areas of contrasting levels of wealth. Nepal (2015) NEEs: Gujarat, India (2001), Sichuan, China (2008) Economically advanced countries: Kobe, (1985) Loma Prieta, California (1989), L'Aquila, (2009) New Zealand (2011) Draw from one example to result for 2nd lesson. Differentiate with group headings or let students classify into their own groups. Students write up findings into two T-Tables (effects and responses) 2nd hour model/template created in first hour, students create a contrasting wealth example. It could be completed as a WebQuest, or using newspaper clippings, news videos, textbook examples or internet research. 3rd hour
AQA-8035-SOW.DOCX