In addition, note that the tender submission should provide sufficient information to allow assessment against the criteria outlined in Section 14. Evaluation Criteria JNCC are not bound to accept the lowest priced or any tender. Having the technical expertise and experience to complete the work to a high standard, and being able to complete it within the timescale, are of the essence for this contract. Tenders will be evaluated using the following criteria: EVALUATION CRITERIA Score Max 1. Quality of proposal, (50% of the total for the three assessment categories) Clarity of proposal (particularly work plan and deliverables) 10 Understanding of, and relevance to, the requirements 10 Soundness and logicality of methods 7 Realism and measurability of milestones 6 Identification and proposed solutions to potential problems/risks 6 Serious weaknesses threaten success 6 Probability of success 5 Sub Totals 50 2. Details of Contractor (25 % of the three assessment categories) Expertise, experience and balance of team 18 Risks if important team members drop out 7 Sub Totals 25 3. Cost (25% of the total for the three assessment categories) Transparency and correctness of presentation 6 Fairness/reasonableness for the level of work and expertise 6 required Appropriateness of ratio of senior to junior staff time 6 Clarity of each team member’s contribution and value added 7
In addition, note that the tender submission should provide sufficient information to allow assessment against the criteria outlined in Section 14. Evaluation Criteria JNCC are not bound to accept the lowest priced or any tender. Having the technical expertise and experience to complete the work to a high standard, and being able to complete it within the timescale, are of the essence for this contract. Tenders will be evaluated using the following criteria: EVALUATION CRITERIA Max Score 1. Quality of proposal, (50% of the total for the three assessment categories) Clarity of proposal (particularly work plan and deliverables) 10 Understanding of, and relevance to, the requirements 10 Soundness and logicality of methods 7 Realism and measurability of milestones 6 Identification and proposed solutions to potential problems/risks 6 Serious weaknesses threaten success 6 Probability of success 5 Sub Totals 50 2. Details of Contractor (25 % of the three assessment categories) Expertise, experience and balance of team 18 Risks if important team members drop out 7 Sub Totals 25 3. Cost (25% of the total for the three assessment categories) Transparency and correctness of presentation 6 Fairness/reasonableness for the level of work and expertise required 6 Appropriateness of ratio of senior to junior staff time 6 Clarity of each team member’s contribution and value added 7
Annex%20A%20Sentinel1_170503_v4.docx