Biodesign Research Faculty Evaluation Criteria COMPONENT #1: RESULTS Leveling Guide Results Criteria Assistant Associate Full General Statement of Entry level rank usually Performing at a National Performing at an Qualification from Faculty Research Stature with a International Stature level Associate or Postdoctoral demonstrated program of with substantial body of Scholar; performance shows research; such evaluation original research and evidence of being able to must occur not later than the significant contributions to a develop a robust program of sixth year as Assistant body of work since promotion research Research Professor to the Associate Research Faculty level Project/Technical Lead role on at least one Lead on one or more Lead on multiple research Leadership project (could include research projects with projects and on cross or PI); provides intellectual leadership for an disciplinary research; drives leadership at a project team established area of research; new areas and programs of level and technical a high level influencer, research through idea leadership with in-depth providing team direction and creation, proposal specialized knowledge of strategic advice development, funding and processes and activities execution Extramural funding support Substantial extramural Substantial extramural Extramural Funding from one or more agencies funding from one or more funding from multiple or sponsors; 100% of sources; manages F&A rates; sponsors; achieves or exceeds Participation in larger salary funded from 100% of salary funded F&A rates; 100% of salary collaborative projects external resources within externally within 3 years funded and substantial team is encouraged for 3 to 5 (new recruits); (new recruits) funding for broad research achieving this criteria program Publications and Record of submitted and Significant body of refereed Significant and uninterrupted Presentations accepted papers in publications presenting body of publications in top reputable, peer reviewed original research in primary refereed journals; more journals with evidence of journals; referenced by lengthy treatment of leadership in the research others in books and articles individual’s work in books program. and noting the distinction of and by peers and recognized faculty member’s work; scholars; Invited and contributed books; invited talks presentations and active and seminars at major participation in important universities, scholarly meetings/conferences societies and national/ international events Patents/Technology Evidence of discoveries Evidence of discoveries Substantial new discovery as Transfer through patent disclosures, through multiple patent evidenced by patent applications, and issued applications and issued applications; multiple patents patents patents; may include issued, royalties, and royalties / business start-ups business startups
Biodesign Research Faculty Evaluation Criteria COMPONENT #1: RESULTS Leveling Guide Results Criteria Assistant Associate Full General Statement of Qualification Entry level rank usually from Faculty Research Associate or Postdoctoral Scholar; performance shows evidence of being able to develop a robust program of research Performing at a National Stature with a demonstrated program of research; such evaluation must occur not later than the sixth year as Assistant Research Professor Performing at an International Stature level with substantial body of original research and significant contributions to a body of work since promotion to the Associate Research Faculty level Project/Technical Leadership Lead role on at least one project (could include or PI); provides leadership at a project team level and technical leadership with in-depth specialized knowledge of processes and activities Lead on one or more research projects with intellectual leadership for an established area of research; a high level influencer, providing team direction and strategic advice Lead on multiple research projects and on cross disciplinary research; drives new areas and programs of research through idea creation, proposal development, funding and execution Extramural Funding Participation in larger collaborative projects is encouraged for achieving this criteria Extramural funding support from one or more agencies or sponsors; 100% of salary funded from external resources within 3 to 5 (new recruits); Substantial extramural funding from one or more sources; manages F&A rates; 100% of salary funded externally within 3 years (new recruits) Substantial extramural funding from multiple sponsors; achieves or exceeds F&A rates; 100% of salary funded and substantial team funding for broad research program Publications and Presentations Record of submitted and accepted papers in reputable, peer reviewed journals with evidence of leadership in the research program. Significant body of refereed publications presenting original research in primary journals; referenced by others in books and articles and noting the distinction of faculty member’s work; Invited and contributed presentations and active participation in important meetings/conferences Significant and uninterrupted body of publications in top refereed journals; more lengthy treatment of individual’s work in books and by peers and recognized scholars; books; invited talks and seminars at major universities, scholarly societies and national/ international events Patents/Technology Transfer Evidence of discoveries through patent disclosures, applications, and issued patents Evidence of discoveries through multiple patent applications and issued patents; may include royalties / business start-ups Substantial new discovery as evidenced by patent applications; multiple patents issued, royalties, and business startups
biodesign-research-faculty-evaluation-criteria.docx