the charting, hydrography or the shoreline, the geodesy. The people appealed and -- VICE CHAIR MILLER: My impression was that, is it not fully mapped? MR. ASLASKEN: Oh, the Great Lakes from the shoreline perspective has been updated, yes. VICE CHAIR MILLER: Oh, the shoreline? MR. ASLASKEN: But, I mean, a lot of the different applications for those data, not just charts. And, that the ESI map is one of those examples where they the NOAA shoreline and they classify it for that. VICE CHAIR MILLER: So -- MR. ASLASKEN: They don't remap the shoreline completely. They'll take out a mean hour shoreline, in this case, classify it as a shoreline type for their ESI needs and then they move on. MR. EDWING: You're saying ESI maps should not take an advantage of the -- MR. ASLASKEN: Well, I mean, I'm just it as an example. There's lots of, you know, I was hearing a lot of what they wanted from a mapping standpoint is being supported by the foundation data of the three offices. I don't know if that's, you know, a point we want to make or not, or do you want to make? MR. ARMSTRONG: So I think, you know -- VICE CHAIR MILLER: Go ahead, Andy. MR. ARMSTRONG: Yes, I think we heard that the bathymetry is not there and not adequate. MR. ASLASKEN:: So, we have Army LIDAR data that's working through the system of the nearshore, but that's just one component of recent data that have been collected in the last two years. MR. ARMSTRONG: That's right. But, as I recall, the need was down to 30 meters. I'm sure there's no Army Corps or LIDAR data there. So, yes, I -- we do have the JALBTCX
the charting, hydrography or the shoreline, the geodesy. The people appealed and -- VICE CHAIR MILLER: My impression was that, is it not fully mapped? MR. ASLASKEN: Oh, the Great Lakes from the shoreline perspective has been updated, yes. VICE CHAIR MILLER: Oh, the shoreline? MR. ASLASKEN: But, I mean, a lot of the different applications for those data, not just charts. And, that the ESI map is one of those examples where they the NOAA shoreline and they classify it for that. VICE CHAIR MILLER: So -- MR. ASLASKEN: They don't remap the shoreline completely. They'll take out a mean hour shoreline, in this case, classify it as a shoreline type for their ESI needs and then they move on. MR. EDWING: You're saying ESI maps should not take an advantage of the -- MR. ASLASKEN: Well, I mean, I'm just it as an example. There's lots of, you know, I was hearing a lot of what they wanted from a mapping standpoint is being supported by the foundation data of the three offices. I don't know if that's, you know, a point we want to make or not, or do you want to make? MR. ARMSTRONG: So I think, you know -- VICE CHAIR MILLER: Go ahead, Andy. MR. ARMSTRONG: Yes, I think we heard that the bathymetry is not there and not adequate. MR. ASLASKEN:: So, we have Army LIDAR data that's working through the system of the nearshore, but that's just one component of recent data that have been collected in the last two years. MR. ARMSTRONG: That's right. But, as I recall, the need was down to 30 meters. I'm sure there's no Army Corps or LIDAR data there. So, yes, I -- we do have the JALBTCX
0901NOAA-HSRP.docx