Table Project details Applicant name Abbreviated Location of lead Implementation Location by Project budget project name organisation sites remoteness Aged Care and AC Housing South Australia Adelaide cities $278,800 Housing Group Bairnsdale Bairnsdale Victoria East Gippsland, Outer regional $150,300 Regional Health Victoria Service Barwon Health Barwon Victoria Geelong and Major cities $248,688 surrounding areas Anglican Aged Benetas Victoria Melbourne Major cities $735,039 Care Services Uniting Church in BlueCare Queensland Brisbane Major cities $336,814 Australia Property Trust Blue Care Roman Catholic Centacare Queensland Rockhampton regional $190,785 Trust Corporation Glenview Services Glenview Tasmania Glenorchy (outer Inner regional $181,500 suburb of Hobart) KinCare KinCare New Wales Sydney, Sunshine Major cities $351,822 Community Coast, Adelaide Services Health and Mercy Victoria Melbourne Major cities $214,173 Aged Care Community Care Northern New Wales Sydney Major cities $713,517 Northern Beaches Beaches Presbyterian PresCare Queensland Rockhampton Inner regional $335,529 Church Queensland Uniting Church in WM Brisbane Queensland Brisbane Major cities $892,620 Australia Property Trust Uniting Care WP WP Adelaide South Australia Adelaide Major cities $783,408 Adelaide Total $5,412,995.00 Note: the abbreviated project name is used to identify each project in the remainder of this report. Summary of the evaluation framework and methods The evaluation framework consisted of three levels to examine the impact and outcomes for consumers (patients, residents, clients and carers), individual providers and the system of health and aged care. The framework was based on one which has been used to evaluate a wide range of programs, modified to suit the particular focus of the program (see Appendix 14 for further details). To inform the evaluation, a glossary of relevant terms was developed including, for example, a definition of the term intensive health care’ (Appendix 15). ‘more Evaluation of the program focused on six key issues program delivery, program impact, –
Table Project details Applicant name Abbreviated project name Location of lead organisation Implementation sites Location by remoteness Project budget Aged Care and Housing Group AC Housing South Australia Adelaide cities $278,800 Bairnsdale Regional Health Service Bairnsdale Victoria East Gippsland, Victoria Outer regional $150,300 Barwon Health Barwon Victoria Geelong and surrounding areas Major cities $248,688 Anglican Aged Care Services Benetas Victoria Melbourne Major cities $735,039 Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust Blue Care BlueCare Queensland Brisbane Major cities $336,814 Roman Catholic Trust Corporation Centacare Queensland Rockhampton regional $190,785 Glenview Services Glenview Tasmania Glenorchy (outer suburb of Hobart) Inner regional $181,500 KinCare Community Services KinCare New Wales Sydney, Sunshine Coast, Adelaide Major cities $351,822 Health and Aged Care Mercy Victoria Melbourne Major cities $214,173 Community Care Northern Beaches Northern Beaches New Wales Sydney Major cities $713,517 Presbyterian Church Queensland PresCare Queensland Rockhampton Inner regional $335,529 Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust WM Brisbane Queensland Brisbane Major cities $892,620 Uniting Care WP Adelaide WP Adelaide South Australia Adelaide Major cities $783,408 Total $5,412,995.00 Note: the abbreviated project name is used to identify each project in the remainder of this report. Summary of the evaluation framework and methods The evaluation framework consisted of three levels to examine the impact and outcomes for consumers (patients, residents, clients and carers), individual providers and the system of health and aged care. The framework was based on one which has been used to evaluate a wide range of programs, modified to suit the particular focus of the program (see Appendix 14 for further details). To inform the evaluation, a glossary of relevant terms was developed including, for example, a definition of the term ‘more intensive health care’ (Appendix 15). Evaluation of the program focused on six key issues – program delivery, program impact,
bhcc-innovative-models-evaluation-report.docx