ASSESSMENT CRITERIA QUANTITATIVE-BASED WORK – Level 5 Classification % Knowledge and Problem Solving Calculations Analysis and Presentation of Range Understanding Interpretation Work I 80 100 Comprehensive knowledge and Competent in both the identification and Applies appropriate techniques, Clear evidence of analysis Excellent, well – clear understanding of major modelling of more complex problems and demonstrates innovation and and interpretation of new or directed presentation, [Outstanding and complex theories, principles creativity in formulating abstract data and in logically structured Work] and concepts substantially correct solutions conclusions derived I 70 79 Substantial knowledge and clear Able to identify more complex problems Clear demonstration of the steps Evidence of analysis and Well directed – understanding of major theories, and competent in the modelling of taken, few errors in calculations, interpretation of new and presentation, logically principles and concepts standard problems using recognised methods to seen data in conclusions structured [Excellent Work] formulate solutions derived II (i) 60 69 Evidence of knowledge and Competent in the use of appropriate Able to demonstrate the Reasonable evidence of Clearly presented, – understanding of a range of techniques to identify and model taken, errors in calculations, not analysis and interpretation logically structured [Good Quality theories, principles and concepts standard problems always using recognised methods in evaluating outcomes and Work] to formulate solution deriving conclusions I (ii) 50 - 59 Knowledge and understanding Able to use appropriate techniques to Errors in steps taken in Some evidence of analytical Neat presentation and of key theories, principles and identify and model standard problems calculations, recognised methods and interpretative skills in structure [Acceptable concepts evident not used or used incorrectly evaluating outcomes and Work] deriving conclusions III 40 49 Knowledge and understanding Limited ability to use appropriate Steps taken in calculations are Very limited use or incorrect Weak presentation – of key theories, principles and techniques to identify and model incomplete or largely incorrect, use of analytical and and structure [Adequate concepts limited or inconsistent standard problems recognised methods not used or interpretative skills Work] used incorrectly Fail 35 39 Knowledge and understanding Very limited ability to use appropriate taken in calculations are Little or no analysis and Poor presentation and – of key theories, principles and techniques to identify and model incomplete and incorrect interpretation inadequate structure (marginal) concepts very limited standard problems recognised methods not used or used incorrectly [Limited Work] Fail 0 34 Lack of knowledge and Not able to use appropriate techniques to Steps taken in calculations are No analysis or interpretation Unacceptable – understanding of key theories identify and model standard problems incomplete and incorrect presentation and [Unacceptable principles and concepts recognised methods not used or structure Work] used incorrectly
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA – QUANTITATIVE-BASED WORK Level 5 Classification % Range Knowledge and Understanding Problem Solving Calculations Analysis and Interpretation Presentation of Work I [Outstanding Work] 80 – 100 Comprehensive knowledge and clear understanding of major and complex theories, principles and concepts Competent in both the identification and modelling of more complex problems Applies appropriate techniques, and demonstrates innovation and creativity in formulating substantially correct solutions Clear evidence of analysis and interpretation of new or abstract data and in conclusions derived Excellent, well directed presentation, logically structured I [Excellent Work] 70 – 79 Substantial knowledge and clear understanding of major theories, principles and concepts Able to identify more complex problems and competent in the modelling of standard problems Clear demonstration of the steps taken, few errors in calculations, using recognised methods to formulate solutions Evidence of analysis and interpretation of new and seen data in conclusions derived Well directed presentation, logically structured II (i) [Good Quality Work] 60 – 69 Evidence of knowledge and understanding of a range of theories, principles and concepts Competent in the use of appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Able to demonstrate the taken, errors in calculations, not always using recognised methods to formulate solution Reasonable evidence of analysis and interpretation in evaluating outcomes and deriving conclusions Clearly presented, logically structured I (ii) [Acceptable Work] 50 - 59 Knowledge and understanding of key theories, principles and concepts evident Able to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Errors in steps taken in calculations, recognised methods not used or used incorrectly Some evidence of analytical and interpretative skills in evaluating outcomes and deriving conclusions Neat presentation and structure III [Adequate Work] 40 – 49 Knowledge and understanding of key theories, principles and concepts limited or inconsistent Limited ability to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Steps taken in calculations are incomplete or largely incorrect, recognised methods not used or used incorrectly Very limited use or incorrect use of analytical and interpretative skills Weak presentation and structure Fail (marginal) [Limited Work] 35 – 39 Knowledge and understanding of key theories, principles and concepts very limited Very limited ability to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems taken in calculations are incomplete and incorrect recognised methods not used or used incorrectly Little or no analysis and interpretation Poor presentation and inadequate structure Fail [Unacceptable Work] 0 – 34 Lack of knowledge and understanding of key theories principles and concepts Not able to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Steps taken in calculations are incomplete and incorrect recognised methods not used or used incorrectly No analysis or interpretation Unacceptable presentation and structure
Assessment-Criteria.docx