holders and implementers. There have been instances where implementers have been declared as licensees’. The Delhi High Court has determined and ‘unwilling discussed of parties based on several factors without laying down a ‘willingness’ precise framework for such determination which could act as a precedent for future disputes. Aysem Diker Vanberg, University of Greenwich (with Johanna Hoekstra, University of Greenwich) critical analysis of the Directive for the Supply of Digital Content” “A In December 2015 the European Commission proposed a new Directive for the Supply of Digital Content (Digital Content Directive). This Directive was presented along with a second Directive on Online and Distant Sale of Goods. Both of these Directives form part of the European Union Digital Single Market strategy and are intended to further harmonise the law of contract across the member states. The European Commission sees differences in substantive contract law as a barrier for international trade for both consumers and for merchants, especially Small and Medium Enterprises. These two proposed Directives replace the project for a Common European Sales Law (CESL) which the Commission deemed not politically viable. Four current EU Directives are concerned with the online sales of consumer goods: the Consumer Sales Directive, the Consumer Rights Directive, the Unfair Terms Directive, and the E-commerce Directive. The two new Directives supplement the existing legislation. The proposed new legislation opts for maximum harmonisation and is intended to promote a more coherent and less fragmentised framework regarding Ecommerce and consumers. At the same time the split between physical transactions and electronic transactions also causes further fragmentation. In the same way as the split between consumer sales and commercial sales, and international sales and domestic sales does.
holders and implementers. There have been instances where implementers have been declared as ‘unwilling licensees’. The Delhi High Court has determined and discussed ‘willingness’ of parties based on several factors without laying down a precise framework for such determination which could act as a precedent for future disputes. Aysem Diker Vanberg, University of Greenwich (with Johanna Hoekstra, University of Greenwich) “A critical analysis of the Directive for the Supply of Digital Content” In December 2015 the European Commission proposed a new Directive for the Supply of Digital Content (Digital Content Directive). This Directive was presented along with a second Directive on Online and Distant Sale of Goods. Both of these Directives form part of the European Union Digital Single Market strategy and are intended to further harmonise the law of contract across the member states. The European Commission sees differences in substantive contract law as a barrier for international trade for both consumers and for merchants, especially Small and Medium Enterprises. These two proposed Directives replace the project for a Common European Sales Law (CESL) which the Commission deemed not politically viable. Four current EU Directives are concerned with the online sales of consumer goods: the Consumer Sales Directive, the Consumer Rights Directive, the Unfair Terms Directive, and the E-commerce Directive. The two new Directives supplement the existing legislation. The proposed new legislation opts for maximum harmonisation and is intended to promote a more coherent and less fragmentised framework regarding Ecommerce and consumers. At the same time the split between physical transactions and electronic transactions also causes further fragmentation. In the same way as the split between consumer sales and commercial sales, and international sales and domestic sales does.
BILETA%20abstract%20collation%202018.docx