Table S1. Calculation of theoretical integrations from relative abundance determined by GPC and theoretical molar masses. Theoretical # Theoretical # of Contribution to Contribution to Molar Mass Relative Abundance of carbonyl C’s terminal methoxy integration of carbonyl integration of terminal (g/mol) (wt. %) Mole Fraction per chain C’s per C's per chain methoxy C's per chain Monomer 1314.5 43.37 0.667 1.75 1.75 1.17 1.17 Dimer 2538.9 24.78 0.197 2.75 1.75 0.54 0.34 Trimer 3763.5 5.38 0.029 3.75 1.75 0.11 0.05 Tetramer 4988.0 26.47 0.107 4.75 1.75 0.51 0.19 Sum -- 100 1 -- -- 2.33 1.75 Figure S3. Representative DSC Thermograms of PFPEE10-DMC and PFPED10-DMC, illustrating the greater change in glass transition temperature upon salt loading in the E10 series. Traces are vertically offset from each other for ease of visualization. Figure S4. Thermogravimetric Analysis curves of dimethyl carbonate and PFPE polymers.
Table S1. Calculation of theoretical integrations from relative abundance determined by GPC and theoretical molar masses. Molar Mass (g/mol) Relative Abundance (wt. %) Mole Fraction Theoretical # of carbonyl C’s per chain Theoretical # of terminal methoxy C’s per Contribution to integration of carbonyl C's per chain Contribution to integration of terminal methoxy C's per chain Monomer 1314.5 43.37 0.667 1.75 1.75 1.17 1.17 Dimer 2538.9 24.78 0.197 2.75 1.75 0.54 0.34 Trimer 3763.5 5.38 0.029 3.75 1.75 0.11 0.05 Tetramer 4988.0 26.47 0.107 4.75 1.75 0.51 0.19 Sum -- 100 1 -- -- 2.33 1.75 Figure S3. Representative DSC Thermograms of PFPEE10-DMC and PFPED10-DMC, illustrating the greater change in glass transition temperature upon salt loading in the E10 series. Traces are vertically offset from each other for ease of visualization. Figure S4. Thermogravimetric Analysis curves of dimethyl carbonate and PFPE polymers.
1-s2.0-S0032386116306772-mmc1.docx