Figure S4. The IR images and SEM images of the repetitive stretching test. (a) = 1, (b) N = 3, (c) = 5. N N Table S1. Electroplating time, sheet resistance transmittance fill factor and Rs, T, fF, Tf of CFH for different electrospinning times. (%) (%) fF Tf (s) (s) (Ω·sq-1) (%) ts tp Rs T 6 94 2 0.370 96 5 36 64 5 0.266 60 90 65 35 10 0.101 30 180 Table S2. PAN nanofibers and copper-plating parameters for each case. Experimental result Case Ca (s) (μm) (μm) (A) (μm) ts Dp Lt Ip Dc 0.51 145.76 3.094 0.0270 1.16 5 0.50 367.95 3.193 0.0276 1.18 90 0.51 751.65 3.294 0.0279 1.19 180 Table S3. The element ratio of the CFH with = 96% during the 20-cycle test. T Element Before the cycling test 10 cycles After 20 cycles (Weight %) 97.4 96.7 95.3 Cu 0.4 0.7 0.8 O 2.2 2.6 3.9 C Table S4. The properties for the CFHs in Figure 3d.
Figure S4. The IR images and SEM images of the repetitive stretching test. (a) N = 1, (b) N = 3, (c) N = 5. Table S1. Electroplating time, sheet resistance Rs, transmittance T, fill factor fF, and Tf of CFH for different electrospinning times. ts (s) tp (s) Rs (Ω·sq-1) T (%) fF (%) Tf (%) 5 2 0.370 96 6 94 90 5 0.266 60 36 64 180 10 0.101 30 65 35 Table S2. PAN nanofibers and copper-plating parameters for each case. Case Experimental result ts (s) Dp (μm) Lt (μm) Ip (A) Ca Dc (μm) 5 0.51 145.76 3.094 0.0270 1.16 90 0.50 367.95 3.193 0.0276 1.18 180 0.51 751.65 3.294 0.0279 1.19 Table S3. The element ratio of the CFH with T = 96% during the 20-cycle test. Element (Weight %) Before the cycling test 10 cycles After 20 cycles Cu 97.4 96.7 95.3 O 0.4 0.7 0.8 C 2.2 2.6 3.9 Table S4. The properties for the CFHs in Figure 3d.
am2016206x1.docx