Compliance with the requirements at the decision-making stage for each department and agency is illustrated in Table 3.1. Detailed compliance results by department and agency follows. Further details on any of the listed regulatory decisions can be obtained from the OBPR website. Table 3.1: Regulatory Impact Analysis compliance by department or agency 2012–13 stage) Department/Agency Regulation Regulation Exceptional Impact Impact circumstances Statements Statements Compliant Non-Compliant Attorney-General’s Department 3 1 Australian Communications and 3 Media Authority Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2 Australian Prudential Regulation Authority 4 Australian Securities and Investments Commission 8 Aviation and Safety Authority 3 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries 3 and Forestry Department of Broadband, Communications and the 3 1 Digital Economy 2a Department of Education, Employment and Workplace 3 Relations Department of Health and Ageing 6 Department of Immigration and Citizenship 2 1 1 Department of Industry, Innovation, 8 1 Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education Department of Infrastructure and Transport 2 Department of Resources, Energy 2 and Tourism Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, 1 2 Population and Communities Murray-Darling Basin Authority 1 Private Health Insurance 1 Administration Council Reserve Bank of Australia 2 Treasury 8 64 2 8 a These two RISs were adequate at the decision-making stage, but non-compliant at the transparency stage. 3.1 Detailed compliance results by Portfolio The following tables show more detailed compliance by department and agency at the decision-making stage and transparency stage. Prime Minister’s exemptions for exceptional circumstances are also identified. 3.1.1 Attorney-General’s Department
Compliance with the requirements at the decision-making stage for each department and agency is illustrated in Table 3.1. Detailed compliance results by department and agency follows. Further details on any of the listed regulatory decisions can be obtained from the OBPR website. Table 3.1: Regulatory Impact Analysis compliance by department or agency 2012–13 stage) Department/Agency Regulation Impact Statements Compliant Regulation Impact Statements Non-Compliant Exceptional circumstances Attorney-General’s Department 3 1 Australian Communications and Media Authority 3 Australian Fisheries Management Authority 2 Australian Prudential Regulation Authority 4 Australian Securities and Investments Commission 8 Aviation and Safety Authority 3 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry 3 Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy 3 1 Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations 2a 3 Department of Health and Ageing 6 Department of Immigration and Citizenship 2 1 1 Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education 8 1 Department of Infrastructure and Transport 2 Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism 2 Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities 1 2 Murray-Darling Basin Authority 1 Private Health Insurance Administration Council 1 Reserve Bank of Australia 2 Treasury 8 64 2 8 a These two RISs were adequate at the decision-making stage, but non-compliant at the transparency stage. 3.1 Detailed compliance results by Portfolio The following tables show more detailed compliance by department and agency at the decision-making stage and transparency stage. Prime Minister’s exemptions for exceptional circumstances are also identified. 3.1.1 Attorney-General’s Department
best_practice_regulation_report_2013_1.docx