Tier Level & Discounts Tier Level - for details of Tiers and the Harvest Strategy, see: Discount factor 0 % Is a multi-year Yes (in place this No TAC in place? season) 2016-17 is the final year of the year TAC. Is a multi-year Yes (recommended No TAC for future seasons) recommended? (please provide a Three year: 1128 t clear indication on Five year: 1115 t whether the year recommendation is a RBC (e.g. based on Tier 1 model output) or TAC (e.g. a roll-over of catch)) Breakout for Observed standardized multi-year TAC CPUE or FIS (when run) falls outside the 95 per cent confidence intervals projected from the assessment. Have breakout N/A rules been triggered? Assessment Stock indicator trends remaining above target, estimated spawning biomass suggests a gradual decline toward the target since 2012-13. The spread of ages in recent age data indicates the is
Tier Level & Discounts Tier Level - for details of Tiers and the Harvest Strategy, see: Discount factor 0 % Is a multi-year TAC in place? Yes (in place this season) 2016-17 is the final year of the TAC. No Is a multi-year TAC recommended? (please provide a clear indication on whether the recommendation is a RBC (e.g. based on Tier 1 model output) or TAC (e.g. a roll-over of catch)) Yes (recommended for future seasons) Three year: 1128 t Five year: 1115 t No Breakout for multi-year TAC Observed standardized CPUE or FIS (when run) falls outside the 95 per cent confidence intervals projected from the assessment. Have breakout rules been triggered? N/A Assessment Stock indicator trends remaining above target, estimated spawning biomass suggests a gradual decline toward the target since 2012-13. The spread of ages in recent age data indicates the is year year
attachment-d-sessf-2017-18-species-summaries-from-2016-assessments.docx