Between 2013 and 2016, the percentage of students scoring proficient or advanced in science declined by 1 percentage point for all students and by 3 percentage points for students with disabilities, and improved by 1 percentage point for high needs students. In 2016, the percentage of students scoring proficient or advanced in science was 9 percentage points below the 2016 state rate for the district as a whole and by 1 and 16 percentage points for high needs students and students with disabilities, respectively. 4: Avon Public Schools Science Percent Proficient or Advanced by Subgroup 2013–2016 4-Year Above/Below Group 2013 2014 2015 2016 Trend State (2016) District 46% 51% 47% 45% -1 All students -9 State 53% 55% 54% 54% 1 District 29% 35% 35% 30% 1 High Needs -1 State 31% 33% 31% 31% 0 Economically District -- -- 38% 39% -- 7 Disadvantaged State -- -- 34% 32% -- ELL and former District -- -- -- -- -- -- ELL students State 19% 18% 19% 19% 0 Students with District 8% 5% 22% 5% -3 -16 disabilities State 21% 21% 22% 21% 0 The district did not reach its 2016 Composite Performance Index (CPI) targets in ELA, math, and science for any group except students from economically disadvantaged families in ELA. Table 5: Avon Public Schools 2016 CPI and Targets by Subgroup ELA Math Science 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 Rating Rating Rating CPI Target CPI Target CPI Target Improved Improved No All students 90.1 93.9 Below 80.8 89.8 Below 75.0 90.1 Change Target Target Improved Improved No High Needs 81.0 90.6 Below 68.7 84.1 Below 65.2 84.2 Change Target Target Economically Above No No 85.1 80.4 72.5 75.5 71.6 74.1 Disadvantaged Target Change Change ELLs -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Improved Improved Students with 62.5 84.0 Below 47.8 74.4 Below 40.5 76.7 Declined disabilities Target Target In 2016, students’ growth in ELA and math was moderate compared with their academic peers statewide for all students, high needs students, and students from economically disadvantaged families, and growth for students with disabilities was moderate in ELA and low in math compared with the academic peers.
Between 2013 and 2016, the percentage of students scoring proficient or advanced in science declined by 1 percentage point for all students and by 3 percentage points for students with disabilities, and improved by 1 percentage point for high needs students. In 2016, the percentage of students scoring proficient or advanced in science was 9 percentage points below the 2016 state rate for the district as a whole and by 1 and 16 percentage points for high needs students and students with disabilities, respectively. 4: Avon Public Schools Science Percent Proficient or Advanced by Subgroup 2013–2016 Group 2013 2014 2015 2016 4-Year Trend Above/Below State (2016) All students District 46% 51% 47% 45% -1 -9 State 53% 55% 54% 54% 1 High Needs District 29% 35% 35% 30% 1 -1 State 31% 33% 31% 31% 0 Economically Disadvantaged District -- -- 38% 39% -- 7 State -- -- 34% 32% -- ELL and former ELL students District -- -- -- -- -- -- State 19% 18% 19% 19% 0 Students with disabilities District 8% 5% 22% 5% -3 -16 State 21% 21% 22% 21% 0 The district did not reach its 2016 Composite Performance Index (CPI) targets in ELA, math, and science for any group except students from economically disadvantaged families in ELA. Table 5: Avon Public Schools 2016 CPI and Targets by Subgroup ELA Math Science 2016 CPI 2016 Target Rating 2016 CPI 2016 Target Rating 2016 CPI 2016 Target Rating All students 90.1 93.9 Improved Below Target 80.8 89.8 Improved Below Target 75.0 90.1 No Change High Needs 81.0 90.6 Improved Below Target 68.7 84.1 Improved Below Target 65.2 84.2 No Change Economically Disadvantaged 85.1 80.4 Above Target 72.5 75.5 No Change 71.6 74.1 No Change ELLs -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Students with disabilities 62.5 84.0 Improved Below Target 47.8 74.4 Improved Below Target 40.5 76.7 Declined In 2016, students’ growth in ELA and math was moderate compared with their academic peers statewide for all students, high needs students, and students from economically disadvantaged families, and growth for students with disabilities was moderate in ELA and low in math compared with the academic peers.
avon-public-schools.docx