Policy H5 Market Housing Mix: – Replace with in line of the policy as the original term is too restrictive. The ‘will’ ‘should’ second sentence, beginning this way…’ is Explanation, not policy and should be removed ‘In from the policy text. The %’s are not listed as a range as in the Core Strategy and as such will be almost impossible to achieve if the development is an odd number. Explanation The first paragraph is duplication of the penultimate paragraph on p.24 (which is – part of explanatory text for Policy H4). Paragraph 4 of the explanation indicates that the NDP be at odds with the District Council’s Core Strategy’. I assume this relates specifically to ‘will the 4+ bed market housing? Local evidence will be essential if the PC consider the policy is not in conformity with other Development Plan policies. Section 7 Employment p.26 to 27 Policy E1 Protecting and Enhancing Local Employment Opportunities: – – The word should be deleted from 2nd line? ‘not’ in the paragraph of the policy should read Criterion b) delete the ‘Resisted’ ‘supported’? word Replace text in criterion d) with of the site for other appropriate ‘where’. ‘development uses will remove existing unacceptable environmental problems associated with the current use’. Explanation: Insert between and in the first line. ‘area’ ‘neighbourhood’ ‘is’ Policy E2 Home Working: – In relation to live-work units, it would seem appropriate to state that the location of new build units should be in accordance with Policies H1 and H2. The policy has two parts, but the policy title only covers one part suggest new title reads – Working and Live-Work Units’. Delete accordance with Policy ECON3’ from first ‘Home ‘in paragraph there is no policy ECON 3 in this NDP… – Explanation: Final paragraph what is meant by the phrase this should not create a – ‘although license for additional rooms to be built by developers’? This requires re-drafting or further explanation. Live-work units c) layout and design ensures that residential and work uses can operate without conflict – need to clarify if this relates to internal arrangements or the wider neighbouring amenity
Policy H5 – Market Housing Mix: Replace ‘will’ with ‘should’ in line of the policy as the original term is too restrictive. The second sentence, beginning ‘In this way…’ is Explanation, not policy and should be removed from the policy text. The %’s are not listed as a range as in the Core Strategy and as such will be almost impossible to achieve if the development is an odd number. Explanation – The first paragraph is duplication of the penultimate paragraph on p.24 (which is part of explanatory text for Policy H4). Paragraph 4 of the explanation indicates that the NDP ‘will be at odds with the District Council’s Core Strategy’. I assume this relates specifically to the 4+ bed market housing? Local evidence will be essential if the PC consider the policy is not in conformity with other Development Plan policies. Section 7 – Employment p.26 to 27 Policy E1 – Protecting and Enhancing Local Employment Opportunities: The word ‘not’ should be deleted from 2nd line? ‘Resisted’ in the paragraph of the policy should read ‘supported’? Criterion b) delete the word ‘where’. Replace text in criterion d) with ‘development of the site for other appropriate uses will remove existing unacceptable environmental problems associated with the current use’. Explanation: Insert ‘area’ between ‘neighbourhood’ and ‘is’ in the first line. Policy E2 – Home Working: In relation to live-work units, it would seem appropriate to state that the location of new build units should be in accordance with Policies H1 and H2. The policy has two parts, but the policy title only covers one part – suggest new title reads ‘Home Working and Live-Work Units’. Delete ‘in accordance with Policy ECON3’ from first paragraph – there is no policy ECON 3 in this NDP… Explanation: Final paragraph – what is meant by the phrase ‘although this should not create a license for additional rooms to be built by developers’? This requires re-drafting or further explanation. Live-work units c) layout and design ensures that residential and work uses can operate without conflict – need to clarify if this relates to internal arrangements or the wider neighbouring amenity
Appendix%201%20-%20Tysoe%20-%20SDC%20Comments%20on%20pre-sub%20NDP%202%2018.7.17.docx