5 Outline deontology as a generic theory of Kant, I, Maxim Activities focusing on: Practice definition decision making. questions. Foundations of Deontology understanding the the metaphysics Outline Kantian deontological ethics, definitions of key terms Use of examples Categorical of morals covering all aspects of the theory. an concepts to demonstrate imperative Kantian Explain through demonstration, the using examples to Hypothetical deontological difference between a categorical and a illustrate imperative ethics in practice. hypothetical imperative. Build this into understanding. the explanation of the Kantian focus on the categorical. Use examples of ethical situations to illustrate the decision making process used by an ethical being following Kantian deontological ethics. This week will focus on the strengths of Activities focusing on Outline questions. 6 Kantian deontological ethics by appreciating the relative Group work and highlighting the ways in which issues with merits of a theory. collaboration on utilitarianism are no longer issues for a organising Kantian. responses. This should reinforce what was learnt in week 5 around the theory itself. 7–8 Issues with Kantian deontological ethics. Foot, P, Morality Consequence Activities focusing on: 12-mark exam as a system of questions. After re-capping the central tenets of Universalisability discussing the relative hypothetical Kantian deontological ethics, students to merits of different Students working imperatives, vol work in groups to identify apparent objections to a position together to issues, particularly with regards to a 81, issue 3, generate ideas discussing the relative comparison of all forms of utilitarianism. and articulate merits of different why issues arise Explore the issue around the intuition objections to a position with Kantian that consequences of actions determine using examples to deontological their moral value (independent of
5 Outline deontology as a generic theory of decision making. Outline Kantian deontological ethics, covering all aspects of the theory. Explain through demonstration, the difference between a categorical and a hypothetical imperative. Build this into the explanation of the Kantian focus on the categorical. Use examples of ethical situations to illustrate the decision making process used by an ethical being following Kantian deontological ethics. Kant, I, Foundations of the metaphysics of morals Maxim Deontology Categorical imperative Hypothetical imperative Activities focusing on: understanding the definitions of key terms an concepts using examples to illustrate understanding. Practice definition questions. Use of examples to demonstrate Kantian deontological ethics in practice. 6 This week will focus on the strengths of Kantian deontological ethics by highlighting the ways in which issues with utilitarianism are no longer issues for a Kantian. This should reinforce what was learnt in week 5 around the theory itself. Activities focusing on appreciating the relative merits of a theory. Outline questions. Group work and collaboration on organising responses. 7–8 Issues with Kantian deontological ethics. After re-capping the central tenets of Kantian deontological ethics, students to work in groups to identify apparent issues, particularly with regards to a comparison of all forms of utilitarianism. Explore the issue around the intuition that consequences of actions determine their moral value (independent of Foot, P, Morality as a system of hypothetical imperatives, vol 81, issue 3, Consequence Universalisability Activities focusing on: discussing the relative merits of different objections to a position discussing the relative merits of different objections to a position using examples to 12-mark exam questions. Students working together to generate ideas and articulate why issues arise with Kantian deontological
AQA-71711B-71721B-SOW.DOCX