DTRW— J. Redding stated that curriculum was — #1: processed and commentary brought back to Jenny Redding Curriculum course authors. #2 Degree & Cert. Requirements DCSL— R. Cabral distributed a packet of APs for — R. Cabral #6 District review by the Senate and requested that Robert Cabral requested faculty and College comments and input be forwarded to him by the input on packet Gov. of APs be Structures end of this week, e.g., Friday, April 30th. forwarded to him #10 by Fri., April Processes for 30th. Institu. Planning Old Business Senate By-Laws Update No report was given. OC Participatory Governance Five main concerns were raised by the Ad Hoc Committee, according to R. Cabral, namely: Manual R. Cabral – (1) the need to remove the 2-year membership limitation on committees; (2) the need to retain the term for PBC; (3) the need to “Council” change faculty membership on PBC to “nine” instead of in order to maintain the proper “six” faculty ratio; (4) the fact that there is no description of the LOT committee currently included in the draft; and (5) the need to original wording from the 2006 Collegial document into description of Consultation PEPC in order to include student services and business administrative services in program review. R. Cabral will take these concerns to R. Duran at his next meeting with the College President as well as
DTRW— Jenny Redding — J. Redding stated that curriculum was processed and commentary brought back to course authors. #1: Curriculum #2 Degree & Cert. Requirements DCSL— Robert Cabral — R. Cabral distributed a packet of APs for review by the Senate and requested that comments and input be forwarded to him by the end of this week, e.g., Friday, April 30th. R. Cabral requested faculty input on packet of APs be forwarded to him by Fri., April 30th. #6 District and College Gov. Structures #10 Processes for Institu. Planning Old Business Senate By-Laws Update No report was given. OC Participatory Governance Manual – R. Cabral Five main concerns were raised by the Ad Hoc Committee, according to R. Cabral, namely: (1) the need to remove the 2-year membership limitation on committees; (2) the need to retain the term “Council” for PBC; (3) the need to change faculty membership on PBC to “nine” instead of “six” in order to maintain the proper faculty ratio; (4) the fact that there is no description of the LOT committee currently included in the draft; and (5) the need to original wording from the 2006 Collegial Consultation document into description of PEPC in order to include student services and business administrative services in program review. R. Cabral will take these concerns to R. Duran at his next meeting with the College President as well as
AS_Minutes_4-26-10.docx