Part-3 : EVALUATION BY REPORTING & REVIEWING OFFICER Guidelines regarding filling up of APAR with numerical grading The columns in the APAR should be filled with due care and attention and after devoting adequate time. It is expected that any grading of 1 or 2 (against work output or attributes or overall would be adequately justified in the pen-picture by way of specific failure and similarly, any grade of 9 or 10 would be justified with respect to specific accomplishments. Grades of 1-2 or 9-10 are expected to be rare occurrences and hence the need to justify them. In awarding a numerical grade the reporting and reviewing authorities should rate the officer against a larger population of his/her peers that may be currently working under them. APAR’s graded between 8 and 10 will be rated as and will be given a score of 9 for the “outstanding” purpose of calculating average scores for empanelment/promotion. APAR’s graded between 6 and short of 8 will be rated as good” and will be given a score of 7. “very APAR’s graded between 4 and short of 6 will be rated as and given a score of 5. “good” APAR’s graded below 4 will be given a score of zero. Assessment of Output” (This section carries weightage of 40%) “Work Reporting Reviewing Initial Reviewing Sl. No. Attribute Authority Authority Authority Accomplishment of planned work/ work 1 allotted as per subjects allotted 2 Quality of output 3 Analytical Ability Accomplishment of exceptional work/ 4 unforeseen tasks performed Overall Grading on Output” “Work
Part-3 : EVALUATION BY REPORTING & REVIEWING OFFICER Guidelines regarding filling up of APAR with numerical grading The columns in the APAR should be filled with due care and attention and after devoting adequate time. It is expected that any grading of 1 or 2 (against work output or attributes or overall would be adequately justified in the pen-picture by way of specific failure and similarly, any grade of 9 or 10 would be justified with respect to specific accomplishments. Grades of 1-2 or 9-10 are expected to be rare occurrences and hence the need to justify them. In awarding a numerical grade the reporting and reviewing authorities should rate the officer against a larger population of his/her peers that may be currently working under them. APAR’s graded between 8 and 10 will be rated as “outstanding” and will be given a score of 9 for the purpose of calculating average scores for empanelment/promotion. APAR’s graded between 6 and short of 8 will be rated as “very good” and will be given a score of 7. APAR’s graded between 4 and short of 6 will be rated as “good” and given a score of 5. APAR’s graded below 4 will be given a score of zero. Assessment of “Work Output” (This section carries weightage of 40%) Sl. No. Attribute Reporting Authority Reviewing Authority Initial Reviewing Authority 1 Accomplishment of planned work/ work allotted as per subjects allotted 2 Quality of output 3 Analytical Ability 4 Accomplishment of exceptional work/ unforeseen tasks performed Overall Grading on “Work Output”
APAR_Adminitsrative%20&%20Auxilary.docx