Employment supported employment (SE) vs. treatment as usual (TAU) Findings: Subjects in the supported employment (SE) group were 2.5 times more likely than the treatment as usual interventional site (TAU-IS) group and 11.4 times more likely than the treatment as usual observation site (TAU-OS) group to obtain competitive employment. Ottomanelli et al. RCT with 1 Veterans with spinal cord injury Participants assigned to supported Primary outcome: competitive (2013) employment (SE) or treatment as employment –year US follow-up usual (TAU) Secondary outcomes: health related Employment quality of life (HRQOL), handicap and disability Findings: There were no significant differences in outcomes between veterans who participated in SE and those who received TAU. Participants obtaining competitive employment demonstrated significantly higher scores on the Social Integration, Mobility, and Occupation dimensions of the CHART. Partin et al. RCT, Veterans aged years with a Patients received a phone call to Proportion of patients receiving repeat ≥19 (2006) prescription for nicotine replacement assess smoking status, quit pharmacologic or behavioural US trial, or bupropion for smoking challenges, and treatment treatment in the 6-month Physical cessation/Zyban. preferences, and computerised follow-up period wellbeing (health follow-up Age: Overall: mean age 55 ± 10.59. progress note to providers 7-day point prevalence abstinence and behaviours) period Usual care: 55 ± 11.00 communicating this information satisfaction assessed by patient survey. 2) care: 949 participants. Findings: The intervention significantly increased repeat treatment rates and satisfaction with services; but, did not have a significant effect on abstinence rates. Salyers et al. RCT with Patients currently receiving (or newly Illness management and recovery Diagnoses were assessed with the (2014) 18-month admitted to) mental health services (IMR) group: Trained facilitators ran psychosis modules of the Structured US follow-up with diagnosis of schizophrenia or group sessions using the IMR Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Schizophrenia schizoaffective disorder curriculum, incorporating Psychiatric (PANSS) IMR group (n=60) psychoeducation, Quality of life PS control (n=58) approaches, relapse Illness self-management Mean age: 47.76 +/- 8.9. prevention, social skills training, and Patient Activation Measure coping skills training. Medication adherence Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS)
Employment supported employment (SE) vs. treatment as usual (TAU) Findings: Subjects in the supported employment (SE) group were 2.5 times more likely than the treatment as usual interventional site (TAU-IS) group and 11.4 times more likely than the treatment as usual observation site (TAU-OS) group to obtain competitive employment. Ottomanelli et al. (2013) US Employment RCT with 1 –year follow-up Veterans with spinal cord injury Participants assigned to supported employment (SE) or treatment as usual (TAU) Primary outcome: competitive employment Secondary outcomes: health related quality of life (HRQOL), handicap and disability Findings: There were no significant differences in outcomes between veterans who participated in SE and those who received TAU. Participants obtaining competitive employment demonstrated significantly higher scores on the Social Integration, Mobility, and Occupation dimensions of the CHART. Partin et al. (2006) US Physical wellbeing (health behaviours) RCT, trial, follow-up period Veterans aged ≥19 years with a prescription for nicotine replacement or bupropion for smoking cessation/Zyban. Age: Overall: mean age 55 ± 10.59. Usual care: 55 ± 11.00 Patients received a phone call to assess smoking status, quit challenges, and treatment preferences, and computerised progress note to providers communicating this information 2) care: 949 participants. Proportion of patients receiving repeat pharmacologic or behavioural treatment in the 6-month follow-up period 7-day point prevalence abstinence and satisfaction assessed by patient survey. Findings: The intervention significantly increased repeat treatment rates and satisfaction with services; but, did not have a significant effect on abstinence rates. Salyers et al. (2014) US Schizophrenia RCT with 18-month follow-up Patients currently receiving (or newly admitted to) mental health services with diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder IMR group (n=60) PS control (n=58) Mean age: 47.76 +/- 8.9. Illness management and recovery (IMR) group: Trained facilitators ran group sessions using the IMR curriculum, incorporating psychoeducation, approaches, relapse prevention, social skills training, and coping skills training. Diagnoses were assessed with the psychosis modules of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Psychiatric (PANSS) Quality of life Illness self-management Patient Activation Measure Medication adherence Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS)
ARP1702_HealthyAgeing_REA_EP_June2018.docx