Figure CEC Special Education Data Additionally, the School of Education utilizes candidate dispositions to determine how well candidates are meeting specific criteria aligned to the conceptual framework. The disposition rubric was modified in 2009 to better reflect the expectations of the unit and to closer to the conceptual framework. Below are the data collected using the new disposition rubric by program. The date indicate that the majority of the candidates (students) are performing at the acceptable level or above for all dispositions measured. Table P-4 Early Childhood Disposition Data P-4 Early Childhood Dispositions Fall 2009 % % % % % 5=Target 4=Emerging 3=Acceptable Improvement 1=Unacceptable Knowledge K1The candidate engages in self-evaluation of 42% 58% 0% 0% 0% his/her professional growth. K2 Take an active interest in students’ well 44% 2% 54% 0% 0% being. Pedagogy PED1 The candidate uses a variety of 38% 8% 54% 0% 0% strategies to support learning for all students. PED2 The candidate encourages students to 42% 4% 54% 0% 0% reach their full potential. Diversity D1 The candidate respects the values and 42% 58% 0% 0% 0% beliefs of other cultures. D2 The candidate models positive interactions 44% 56% 0% 0% 0% with people from other cultures. D3 The candidate treats others fairly and with 45% 54% 0% 0% 0% respect. Technology T1 The candidate uses technology to enhance 42% 4% 54% 0% 0% student learning. T2 The candidate uses technology for personal 44% 56% 0% 0% 0% and professional productivity. T3 The candidate uses technology to engage 40% 6% 54% 0% 0% students in authentic, complex Professionalism PRF1 The candidate seeks opportunities for 40% 60% 0% 0% 0% collaboration. PRF2 The candidate fulfills his/her 42% 23% 35% 0% 0% responsibility when working with others. PRF3 The candidate monitors the effects of 46% 35% 19% 0% 0% his/her decisions. PRF4 The candidate acts in a manner consistent with his/her professional code of 44% 56% 0% 0% 0% ethics. PRF5 The candidate accepts responsibility for 44% 54% 2% 0% 0% his/her actions.
Figure CEC Special Education Data Additionally, the School of Education utilizes candidate dispositions to determine how well candidates are meeting specific criteria aligned to the conceptual framework. The disposition rubric was modified in 2009 to better reflect the expectations of the unit and to closer to the conceptual framework. Below are the data collected using the new disposition rubric by program. The date indicate that the majority of the candidates (students) are performing at the acceptable level or above for all dispositions measured. Table P-4 Early Childhood Disposition Data P-4 Early Childhood Dispositions Fall 2009 % 5=Target % 4=Emerging % 3=Acceptable % Improvement % 1=Unacceptable Knowledge K1The candidate engages in self-evaluation of his/her professional growth. 42% 58% 0% 0% 0% K2 Take an active interest in students’ well being. 44% 2% 54% 0% 0% Pedagogy PED1 The candidate uses a variety of strategies to support learning for all students. 38% 8% 54% 0% 0% PED2 The candidate encourages students to reach their full potential. 42% 4% 54% 0% 0% Diversity D1 The candidate respects the values and beliefs of other cultures. 42% 58% 0% 0% 0% D2 The candidate models positive interactions with people from other cultures. 44% 56% 0% 0% 0% D3 The candidate treats others fairly and with respect. 45% 54% 0% 0% 0% Technology T1 The candidate uses technology to enhance student learning. 42% 4% 54% 0% 0% T2 The candidate uses technology for personal and professional productivity. 44% 56% 0% 0% 0% T3 The candidate uses technology to engage students in authentic, complex 40% 6% 54% 0% 0% Professionalism PRF1 The candidate seeks opportunities for collaboration. 40% 60% 0% 0% 0% PRF2 The candidate fulfills his/her responsibility when working with others. 42% 23% 35% 0% 0% PRF3 The candidate monitors the effects of his/her decisions. 46% 35% 19% 0% 0% PRF4 The candidate acts in a manner consistent with his/her professional code of ethics. 44% 56% 0% 0% 0% PRF5 The candidate accepts responsibility for his/her actions. 44% 54% 2% 0% 0%
assessment%20report%202009.docx