equilibrium” (Sarkar 2011). Gorkhas, as I have argued, have inherited these edge effects, and the ways in which they confront them can enrich anthropological and related approaches to justice and injustice in agrarian environments. Stopping the downhill loss of land and people was not just a strategy of GJMM political action, but also a desire of nearly all Gorkhas with whom I talked. Belonging is relationship between Gorkhas and both material and metaphorical land. These material and epistemological framings of land undermine clean claims to territory and uniform re-shapings of landscape. Bibliography Agrawal, Arun. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Durham: Duke University Press. Subjects. Agrawal, Arun and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2000. Agrarian Environments.” In “Introduction: Agrawal and Agrarian Environments: Resources, Representation, and Rule in Sivaramakrishnan, eds. Pp. 1-22. Durham: Duke University Press. Bagchi, Romit. 2012. New Delhi: SAGE Gorkhaland: Crisis of Statehood. Barth, Fredrik. 1998 [1969]. In “Introduction.” Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Fredrik Barth, ed. Pp. 9-38. Long Grove, IL: Organization of Culture Difference. Waveland Press. Baruah, Sanjib. 2012. River is it Anyway? Political Economy of Hydropower in the “Whose Eastern Himalayas.” 47(29): 41-52. Economic and Political Weekly. Baruah, Sanjib. 1999. Philadelphia: India Against Itself: Assam and the Politics of Nationality. University of Pennsylvania Press. Basso, Keith. 1996. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. Wisdom Sits in Places. Besky, Sarah. 2014a. The Darjeeling Distinction: Labor and Justice on Fair-Trade Tea Berkeley: University of California Press. Plantations in Darjeeling. ----------. 2014b. Labor of and the of Labor: Geographical Indication on Terroir Terroir “The Darjeeling Tea Plantations.” 31(1): 83-96. Agriculture and Human Values.
equilibrium” (Sarkar 2011). Gorkhas, as I have argued, have inherited these edge effects, and the ways in which they confront them can enrich anthropological and related approaches to justice and injustice in agrarian environments. Stopping the downhill loss of land and people was not just a strategy of GJMM political action, but also a desire of nearly all Gorkhas with whom I talked. Belonging is relationship between Gorkhas and both material and metaphorical land. These material and epistemological framings of land undermine clean claims to territory and uniform re-shapings of landscape. Bibliography Agrawal, Arun. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press. Agrawal, Arun and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2000. “Introduction: Agrarian Environments.” In Agrarian Environments: Resources, Representation, and Rule in Agrawal and Sivaramakrishnan, eds. Pp. 1-22. Durham: Duke University Press. Bagchi, Romit. 2012. Gorkhaland: Crisis of Statehood. New Delhi: SAGE Barth, Fredrik. 1998 [1969]. “Introduction.” In Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Fredrik Barth, ed. Pp. 9-38. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. Baruah, Sanjib. 2012. “Whose River is it Anyway? Political Economy of Hydropower in the Eastern Himalayas.” Economic and Political Weekly. 47(29): 41-52. Baruah, Sanjib. 1999. India Against Itself: Assam and the Politics of Nationality. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Basso, Keith. 1996. Wisdom Sits in Places. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. Besky, Sarah. 2014a. The Darjeeling Distinction: Labor and Justice on Fair-Trade Tea Plantations in Darjeeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. ----------. 2014b. “The Labor of Terroir and the Terroir of Labor: Geographical Indication on Darjeeling Tea Plantations.” Agriculture and Human Values. 31(1): 83-96.
Besky-Jan15.docx