School School code Subject Subject code District Syllabus year Panel code Please indicate Yes or No: Yes No The course organisation meets relevant syllabus and work program requirements. Evidence from the outline of intended student learning demonstrates that learning experiences will provide: coverage of the identified syllabus objectives contextualised learning appropriate to the assessment techniques. The assessment plan over the two-year course of study: conforms to the principles of exit assessment uses a range of assessment techniques and conditions consistent with syllabus requirements the verification and exit folio requirements indicates which dimensions are assessed by assessment instruments. Comments/action for the work program to be recommended for approval: Note: If the school’s work program is not recommended for approval, the school should reconsider its proposal, make the necessary adjustments and consult with the District/State Review Panel Chair or Senior Education Officer (Quality Assurance Unit) if necessary. The revised work program should then be resubmitted via the QCAA WPOnline database. Approval recommended Yes No Consultation recommended Yes No Completed by chair for the state review panel or district review panel Date / / Name: Phone number:
School School code Subject Subject code District Syllabus year Panel code Please indicate Yes or No: Yes No The course organisation meets relevant syllabus and work program requirements. Evidence from the outline of intended student learning demonstrates that learning experiences will provide: coverage of the identified syllabus objectives contextualised learning appropriate to the assessment techniques. The assessment plan over the two-year course of study: conforms to the principles of exit assessment uses a range of assessment techniques and conditions consistent with syllabus requirements the verification and exit folio requirements indicates which dimensions are assessed by assessment instruments. Comments/action for the work program to be recommended for approval: Note: If the school’s work program is not recommended for approval, the school should reconsider its proposal, make the necessary adjustments and consult with the District/State Review Panel Chair or Senior Education Officer (Quality Assurance Unit) if necessary. The revised work program should then be resubmitted via the QCAA WPOnline database. Approval recommended Yes No Consultation recommended Yes No Completed by chair for the state review panel or district review panel Date / / Name: Phone number:
assess_snr_frm_r2_wp.docx