TABLE NO. 23 (RESTRICTION IN RANGE OF MOVEMENTS AT IP JOINT OF THUMB – AT THE TIME OF FINAL FOLLOW-UP) S. No. 1 No difference 27 2 0-30° 08 3 30-60° 03 4 60-90° 02 At the time of final follow up 67.5% of IP joints regained full movements. TABLE NO. 24 (RESTRICTION IN RANGE OF MOVEMENTS AT PIP JOINT AT THE – TIME OF FINAL FOLLOW-UP) S. 2 3 4 5 No. 1 No 26 28 28 29 difference 2 0-30° 08 07 07 04 3 30-60° 04 03 03 05 4 60-90° 02 02 02 02 At the time of final follow up 69.38% of PIP joint regained full movements. NO. 25 (RESTRICTION IN RANGE OF MOVEMENTS AT DIP JOINT AT THE – TIME OF FINAL FOLLOW-UP) S. 2 3 4 5 No. 1. No 27 31 30 31 difference 2. 0-15° 08 06 07 04 3. 15-30° 02 01 01 03 4. 30-45° 03 02 02 02 At the time of follow up 74.38% of DIP joint regained full movements. NO. 26 (RESTRICTION IN RANGE OF MOVEMENTS AT WRIST JOINT AT TIME – OF FINAL FOLLOW-UP) S. No. 1. No difference 23 2. 0-50° 11 3. 50-100° 03 4. > 100° 03 At the time of final follow up 57.5% of wrist joints regained full movements.
TABLE NO. – 23 (RESTRICTION IN RANGE OF MOVEMENTS AT IP JOINT OF THUMB AT THE TIME OF FINAL FOLLOW-UP) S. No. 1 No difference 27 2 0-30° 08 3 30-60° 03 4 60-90° 02 At the time of final follow up 67.5% of IP joints regained full movements. TABLE NO. – 24 (RESTRICTION IN RANGE OF MOVEMENTS AT PIP JOINT AT THE TIME OF FINAL FOLLOW-UP) S. No. 2 3 4 5 1 No difference 26 28 28 29 2 0-30° 08 07 07 04 3 30-60° 04 03 03 05 4 60-90° 02 02 02 02 At the time of final follow up 69.38% of PIP joint regained full movements. NO. – 25 (RESTRICTION IN RANGE OF MOVEMENTS AT DIP JOINT AT THE TIME OF FINAL FOLLOW-UP) S. No. 2 3 4 5 1. No difference 27 31 30 31 2. 0-15° 08 06 07 04 3. 15-30° 02 01 01 03 4. 30-45° 03 02 02 02 At the time of follow up 74.38% of DIP joint regained full movements. NO. – 26 (RESTRICTION IN RANGE OF MOVEMENTS AT WRIST JOINT AT TIME OF FINAL FOLLOW-UP) S. No. 1. No difference 23 2. 0-50° 11 3. 50-100° 03 4. > 100° 03 At the time of final follow up 57.5% of wrist joints regained full movements.
amit.docx