the National Law University of Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India, www.tradelawdevelopment.com) (lead article). (10) 26 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative WTO Case Review 2008, Law 113-228 (2009) Listed in Top Ten most downloaded articles on SSRN International Economic Law: Dispute Resolution (15 March-14 May 2009). (11) 25 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative WTO Case Review 2007, Law 75-155 (2008) (12) 24 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative WTO Case Review 2006, Law 299-387 (2007) Translated into Chinese by the Shanghai WTO Affairs Consultation Center (Gong Bai Hua, Professor of Law, Fudan University, Shanghai, and Director of Information Division at the Consultation Center) (13) 23 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative WTO Case Review 2005, Law 107-345 (2006) (14) 22 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative WTO Case Review 2004, Law 99-249 (2005) (15) 21 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative WTO Case Review 2003, Law 317-439 (2004) (16) 20 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative WTO Case Review 2002, Law 143-289 (2003) (17) 19 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative WTO Case Review 2001, Law 457-642 (2002) A modified, two-part version of this Review is republished as New WTO Antidumping Precedents Part One: The Dumping Margin Determination, – Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law (June 2002), and New WTO Antidumping Precedents Part Two: Causation, the Injury Determination, – Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law and Penalties, (December 2002) (now known as the Singapore Yearbook of International Law). (18) 18 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative WTO Case Review 2000, Law 1-101 (2001)
the National Law University of Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India, www.tradelawdevelopment.com) (lead article). (10) WTO Case Review 2008, 26 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 113-228 (2009) Listed in Top Ten most downloaded articles on SSRN International Economic Law: Dispute Resolution (15 March-14 May 2009). (11) WTO Case Review 2007, 25 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 75-155 (2008) (12) WTO Case Review 2006, 24 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 299-387 (2007) Translated into Chinese by the Shanghai WTO Affairs Consultation Center (Gong Bai Hua, Professor of Law, Fudan University, Shanghai, and Director of Information Division at the Consultation Center) (13) WTO Case Review 2005, 23 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 107-345 (2006) (14) WTO Case Review 2004, 22 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 99-249 (2005) (15) WTO Case Review 2003, 21 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 317-439 (2004) (16) WTO Case Review 2002, 20 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 143-289 (2003) (17) WTO Case Review 2001, 19 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 457-642 (2002) A modified, two-part version of this Review is republished as New WTO Antidumping Precedents – Part One: The Dumping Margin Determination, Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law (June 2002), and New WTO Antidumping Precedents – Part Two: Causation, the Injury Determination, and Penalties, Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law (December 2002) (now known as the Singapore Yearbook of International Law). (18) WTO Case Review 2000, 18 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 1-101 (2001)
Bhala%20Resume%20and%20Bibliography%20%282018%29%20%28May%29.docx