10 points The project directly results in a sustainable long-term reduction in the – amount of waste being generated for disposal in Missouri. 5 points The project results in a sustainable intermediate-term reduction in the – amount of waste being generated for disposal in Missouri. 1 point The project results in a one-time reduction in the amount of waste being – generated for disposal in Missouri. __________ 4. Targeted Materials List: 7 points The project reduces or recycles material(s) listed 1 through 4 on the – District’s Targeted Materials List. 5 points The project supports reduction or recycling of Electronic in a – single county. 3 points The project supports reduction or recycling of Yard Waste in a single – county. NOTE: Materials ranked from Highest (1) to Lowest (6) are: 1. Fiber (paper, cardboard, etc.) 2. Plastics 3. (including containers and other metals) 4. Glass 5. Electronic Waste 6. Yard Waste Economic Feasibility __________ 1. Private, Not-for-Profits and Public Entities Committed Financing: 10 points All financing for the project is committed and documented. – 6 points Sufficient financing for the project is likely, but not yet committed. – 1 point The likelihood of the project obtaining sufficient financing is – questionable. __________ 2. Applicant’s Contribution: 10 points Project financing includes over 50% match of the total project – costs. 5 points Project financing includes over 33% match of the total project – costs. 3 points Project financing includes 25% local match of the total project cost. – __________ 3. Project Site Identification: 5 points The applicant currently owns or leases the site for the proposed – project. 3 points The applicant has identified a site for the project but cannot – demonstrate commitment for obtaining it for the specified use. 0 points The applicant does not identify a site. – Financial Consideration __________ 1. Budget: 5 points The project budget is well thought out and reasonable. – 3 points The project budget contains some questionable items. – 1 point The project budget is incomplete, confusing or problematic. –
10 points – The project directly results in a sustainable long-term reduction in the amount of waste being generated for disposal in Missouri. 5 points – The project results in a sustainable intermediate-term reduction in the amount of waste being generated for disposal in Missouri. 1 point – The project results in a one-time reduction in the amount of waste being generated for disposal in Missouri. __________ 4. Targeted Materials List: 7 points – The project reduces or recycles material(s) listed 1 through 4 on the District’s Targeted Materials List. 5 points – The project supports reduction or recycling of Electronic in a single county. 3 points – The project supports reduction or recycling of Yard Waste in a single county. NOTE: Materials ranked from Highest (1) to Lowest (6) are: 1. Fiber (paper, cardboard, etc.) 2. Plastics 3. (including containers and other metals) 4. Glass 5. Electronic Waste 6. Yard Waste Economic Feasibility __________ 1. Private, Not-for-Profits and Public Entities Committed Financing: 10 points – All financing for the project is committed and documented. 6 points – Sufficient financing for the project is likely, but not yet committed. 1 point – The likelihood of the project obtaining sufficient financing is questionable. __________ 2. Applicant’s Contribution: 10 points – Project financing includes over 50% match of the total project costs. 5 points – Project financing includes over 33% match of the total project costs. 3 points – Project financing includes 25% local match of the total project cost. __________ 3. Project Site Identification: 5 points – The applicant currently owns or leases the site for the proposed project. 3 points – The applicant has identified a site for the project but cannot demonstrate commitment for obtaining it for the specified use. 0 points – The applicant does not identify a site. Financial Consideration __________ 1. Budget: 5 points – The project budget is well thought out and reasonable. 3 points – The project budget contains some questionable items. 1 point – The project budget is incomplete, confusing or problematic.
Application%20Package%202017-18.docx