Materials to be Submitted Faculty being reviewed should include materials from the date of hire or last promotion, whichever is most recent. Please see the detailed description in Retention. Notification See Appendix A UW-Superior Unclassified Handbook UW-Sup 3.05(2)(b). Annual Review Consistent with Appendix A UWS UW-Superior Unclassified Staff Handbook 3.05, Appendix A and section 7.4.2, the performance of all peer UW-Sup 3.05, faculty in each department will be reviewed annually. Meeting The meeting is open according to the provisions of the Wisconsin Open Meeting Law. If it becomes appropriate for an open meeting to go into closed session, the announces that the body is going into closed session. However, the individual under review may request an open session. For further detail, see UW-Superior or Appendix I of this document. Unclassified Staff Handbook Areas of Review The areas of review shall include (1) teaching, (2) scholarship, and (3) professional and public service as well as contribution to the Institution. III. Criteria for Review Annual review in this department is based on the criteria listed below. Meritorious Teaching Excellent student evaluations and documentation of – excellence in at least three out of four of the following: peer observation, innovation in teaching, use of High Impact Practices, and academic advising. Scholarship Publications, presentations, and/or performances reflect – significant accomplishments with a research agenda and a high level of productivity in distinguished venues. Service Leadership in programmatic, departmental, and institutional – responsibilities, such as governance committees, search committees, curriculum development, etc., as well as in the profession, such as organizing conferences, serving as a peer reviewer for a publication,
Materials to be Submitted Faculty being reviewed should include materials from the date of hire or last promotion, whichever is most recent. Please see the detailed description in Retention. Notification See UW-Superior Unclassified Handbook Appendix A UW-Sup 3.05(2)(b). Annual Review Consistent with UW-Superior Unclassified Staff Handbook Appendix A UWS 3.05, Appendix A UW-Sup 3.05, and section 7.4.2, the performance of all peer faculty in each department will be reviewed annually. Meeting The meeting is open according to the provisions of the Wisconsin Open Meeting Law. If it becomes appropriate for an open meeting to go into closed session, the announces that the body is going into closed session. However, the individual under review may request an open session. For further detail, see UW-Superior Unclassified Staff Handbook or Appendix I of this document. Areas of Review The areas of review shall include (1) teaching, (2) scholarship, and (3) professional and public service as well as contribution to the Institution. III. Criteria for Review Annual review in this department is based on the criteria listed below. Meritorious Teaching – Excellent student evaluations and documentation of excellence in at least three out of four of the following: peer observation, innovation in teaching, use of High Impact Practices, and academic advising. Scholarship – Publications, presentations, and/or performances reflect significant accomplishments with a research agenda and a high level of productivity in distinguished venues. Service – Leadership in programmatic, departmental, and institutional responsibilities, such as governance committees, search committees, curriculum development, etc., as well as in the profession, such as organizing conferences, serving as a peer reviewer for a publication,
Attachment-8-WLS-Dept-Bylaws-revised-2-27-18.docx