Directions: This section summarizes program accountability requirements unique to the district/consortium based upon federal and state accountability measures. Historically, this report has included information from the District Performance Framework; because of the state assessment transition and passage of HB15-1323, 2015 DPFs will not be created. In the table below, CDE has pre-populated the district/consortium’s data in blue text. This data shows the district/consortium’s performance in meeting minimum federal and state accountability program expectations. Student Performance Measures for State and Federal Accountability Performance 2014-15 Federal and State 2014-15 Grantee Measures/ Metrics Meets Expectations? Indicators Expectations Results A rating of or Exceeds on the AMAO 1 Approaching No Academic Growth sub-indicator for English Description: Academic Growth sub-indicator rating for Language Proficiency. English Language Proficiency AMAO 2 13% of students meet AMAO 2 13,62% Yes Description: % of ELLs that have attained English expectations. English proficiency on WIDA ACCESS Language R Approaching Development (1) Meets or Exceeds ratings on Academic AMAO 3 and Attainment W Approaching Growth Gaps content sub-indicators for Description: Academic Growth Gaps content ELLs, (2) Meets or Exceeds rating on indicator ratings (median and adequate growth M Approaching No Disaggregated Graduation Rate percentiles in reading, mathematics, and writing) for Grad Meets ELLs; Disaggregated Graduation Rate sub-indicator for indicator for ELLs and (3) Meets ELLs; and Participation for ELLs Participation Requirements for ELLs. Meets Accountability Status and Requirements for Improvement Plan (Districts on Priority Improvement or Turnaround) An optional submission for review is available on October 15, 2015 for early feedback. October 15, 2015 For required elements in the improvement plan, go to the Quality Criteria at: . Summary of District Plan (Districts on Priority Improvement or Turnaround) The district UIP is due to CDE for review on January 15, 2016 through Tracker or the January 15, 2016 Timeline UIP online system. (All Districts) The UIP is due to CDE for public posting on April 15, 2016 through Tracker or the UIP online system. Some program level April 15, 2016 reviews will occur at this same time. For required elements in the improvement plan, go to the Quality Criteria at: . Accountability Status and Requirements for Improvement Plan (cont.) Program Identification Process Identification for District Directions for Completing Improvement Plan
Directions: This section summarizes program accountability requirements unique to the district/consortium based upon federal and state accountability measures. Historically, this report has included information from the District Performance Framework; because of the state assessment transition and passage of HB15-1323, 2015 DPFs will not be created. In the table below, CDE has pre-populated the district/consortium’s data in blue text. This data shows the district/consortium’s performance in meeting minimum federal and state accountability program expectations. Student Performance Measures for State and Federal Accountability Performance Indicators Measures/ Metrics 2014-15 Federal and State Expectations 2014-15 Grantee Results Meets Expectations? English Language Development and Attainment AMAO 1 Description: Academic Growth sub-indicator rating for English Language Proficiency A rating of or Exceeds on the Academic Growth sub-indicator for English Language Proficiency. Approaching No AMAO 2 Description: % of ELLs that have attained English proficiency on WIDA ACCESS 13% of students meet AMAO 2 expectations. 13,62% Yes AMAO 3 Description: Academic Growth Gaps content ratings (median and adequate growth percentiles in reading, mathematics, and writing) for ELLs; Disaggregated Graduation Rate sub-indicator for ELLs; and Participation for ELLs (1) Meets or Exceeds ratings on Academic Growth Gaps content sub-indicators for ELLs, (2) Meets or Exceeds rating on Disaggregated Graduation Rate for ELLs and (3) Meets Participation Requirements for ELLs. R Approaching No W Approaching M Approaching Grad Meets Meets Accountability Status and Requirements for Improvement Plan Summary of District Plan Timeline October 15, 2015 (Districts on Priority Improvement or Turnaround) An optional submission for review is available on October 15, 2015 for early feedback. For required elements in the improvement plan, go to the Quality Criteria at: . January 15, 2016 (Districts on Priority Improvement or Turnaround) The district UIP is due to CDE for review on January 15, 2016 through Tracker or the UIP online system. April 15, 2016 (All Districts) The UIP is due to CDE for public posting on April 15, 2016 through Tracker or the UIP online system. Some program level reviews will occur at this same time. For required elements in the improvement plan, go to the Quality Criteria at: . Accountability Status and Requirements for Improvement Plan (cont.) Program Identification Process Identification for District Directions for Completing Improvement Plan indicator indicator
0rhDDZ6KHh2bISakv7RutJwUBhXszsB9ep4MDdqot37QWxGn.docx