(3H) A person is not entitled to apply to the Tribunal S. 50(3H) for review of a decision in relation to which inserted by No. 6/2012 subsection (1), (3), (3A) or (3AB) applies if the s. 15(2), person has made or caused to be made an amended by No. 20/2017 application for review of the decision to the s. 42(6). Visitor of a University unless— (a) the Visitor has declined to conduct that review; or (b) a period of 30 days has elapsed since the day on which that application for review was made. (4) On the hearing of an application for review the S. 50(4) amended by Tribunal shall have, in addition to any other Nos 10155 power, the same powers as an agency or a s. 67(1)(e) (vi)(vii), 7/2003 Minister in respect of a request, including power s. 44(3), to decide that access should be granted to an 20/2017 s. 42(7). exempt document (not being a document referred to in section 28, section 29A, section 31(3), section 31A, or in section 33) where the Tribunal is of opinion that the public interest requires that access to the document should be granted under this Act. (5) Where a certificate has been given in respect of S. 50(5) amended by a document under section 61ZA(2), the powers Nos 10155 of the Tribunal do not extend to reviewing the s. 67(1)(e)(vii), 20/2017 decision to give the certificate and shall be limited s. 42(8). to determining whether a document has been properly classified as an exempt document within the meaning of section 28. (5A) Where a certificate has been given in respect of a S. 50(5A) inserted by document under section 29A(2), the powers of the No. 7/2003 Tribunal do not extend to reviewing the decision s. 44(4). to give the certificate and shall be limited to determining the question whether there exist reasonable grounds for the claim that the document is an exempt document under section 29A.
S. 50(3H) inserted by No. 6/2012 s. 15(2), amended by No. 20/2017 s. 42(6). (3H) A person is not entitled to apply to the Tribunal for review of a decision in relation to which subsection (1), (3), (3A) or (3AB) applies if the person has made or caused to be made an application for review of the decision to the Visitor of a University unless— (a) the Visitor has declined to conduct that review; or (b) a period of 30 days has elapsed since the day on which that application for review was made. S. 50(4) amended by Nos 10155 s. 67(1)(e) (vi)(vii), 7/2003 s. 44(3), 20/2017 s. 42(7). (4) On the hearing of an application for review the Tribunal shall have, in addition to any other power, the same powers as an agency or a Minister in respect of a request, including power to decide that access should be granted to an exempt document (not being a document referred to in section 28, section 29A, section 31(3), section 31A, or in section 33) where the Tribunal is of opinion that the public interest requires that access to the document should be granted under this Act. S. 50(5) amended by Nos 10155 s. 67(1)(e)(vii), 20/2017 s. 42(8). (5) Where a certificate has been given in respect of a document under section 61ZA(2), the powers of the Tribunal do not extend to reviewing the decision to give the certificate and shall be limited to determining whether a document has been properly classified as an exempt document within the meaning of section 28. S. 50(5A) inserted by No. 7/2003 s. 44(4). (5A) Where a certificate has been given in respect of a document under section 29A(2), the powers of the Tribunal do not extend to reviewing the decision to give the certificate and shall be limited to determining the question whether there exist reasonable grounds for the claim that the document is an exempt document under section 29A.
82-9859a100.docx