the current thinking? MR. SCHECHTMAN: I, I think there are, that, that kind of mixes a few things together. There, what we are talking about mitigation and we’re talking about compensation. He was very specific that the compensation mechanism refers to compensation for GE-related presence. And that, and that could apply, I think to all kinds of farmers. If there’s, if there’s an issue related to that. The question of whether or not that would have to be expanded in some way to reach an agreement, I don’t, I, I think, I think you’re going to have to make a decision as to what this committee is going to say and we will have to go back and bring it to the Secretary. And if you find a mechanism to address the questions that he’s concerned with, we’ll take them, we will take that back with us. I don’t think he was as specific in the second instance in talking about the mitigation portion, because the, the element of the charge on that one is broader. It’s helping coexistence. MS. OLSEN: And, thank you. And, and I should have been more focused in my question. I was referring to the, the actual compensation mechanism. I, I also want to make sure that as a committee we still have the same charge, looking at particularly the first, the first charge question, the if any. I want to make sure as a committee
the current thinking? MR. SCHECHTMAN: I, I think there are, that, that kind of mixes a few things together. There, what we are talking about mitigation and we’re talking about compensation. He was very specific that the compensation mechanism refers to compensation for GE-related presence. And that, and that could apply, I think to all kinds of farmers. If there’s, if there’s an issue related to that. The question of whether or not that would have to be expanded in some way to reach an agreement, I don’t, I, I think, I think you’re going to have to make a decision as to what this committee is going to say and we will have to go back and bring it to the Secretary. And if you find a mechanism to address the questions that he’s concerned with, we’ll take them, we will take that back with us. I don’t think he was as specific in the second instance in talking about the mitigation portion, because the, the element of the charge on that one is broader. It’s helping coexistence. MS. OLSEN: And, thank you. And, and I should have been more focused in my question. I was referring to the, the actual compensation mechanism. I, I also want to make sure that as a committee we still have the same charge, looking at particularly the first, the first charge question, the if any. I want to make sure as a committee
052912AC21v1.docx