April 05 Looking Forward Fletcher, Laurel E., Harvey M. and Weinstein, Jamie Rowen. “Context, Timing Dynamics of Transitional Justice: A Human Rights Quarterly Historical Perspective.” 31.1 (2009):163-220. United Nations Secretary General. S/2004/616. Report of the Secretary General: The 2004. Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, United Nations Secretary General. S/2011/634. Report of the Secretary General: The 2011. rule of Law and Transitional Justice In Conflict And Post-Conflict Situations, STUDENT PARTICIPATION Participation Grading Guide Grade Attendance Discussion Reading 20 Always Excellent: leads debate; offers Clearly has done and prepared analysis and comments; always questions on virtually all readings; has ideas on theme of reading; intelligently uses this understanding takes care not to dominate; asks and these questions in discussion questions 15-19 Almost always Very Good: thoughtful Has done most readings; provides comments and questions for the competent analysis of reading when most part; willing, able and prompted by others frequent contributor 10-14 Frequent Good: has basic grasp of key Displays familiarity with most concepts and occasional ideas on readings, but tends not to analyze the main theme of the reading; them or to relate them to the course arguments are sporadic and at material times incomplete or poorly supported; unwilling to ask questions
April 05 Looking Forward Fletcher, Laurel E., Harvey M. Weinstein, Jamie Rowen. “Context, Timing and Dynamics of Transitional Justice: A Historical Perspective.” Human Rights Quarterly 31.1 (2009):163-220. United Nations Secretary General. S/2004/616. Report of the Secretary General: The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 2004. United Nations Secretary General. S/2011/634. Report of the Secretary General: The rule of Law and Transitional Justice In Conflict And Post-Conflict Situations, 2011. STUDENT PARTICIPATION Participation Grading Guide Grade Attendance Discussion Reading 20 Always Excellent: leads debate; offers analysis and comments; always has ideas on theme of reading; takes care not to dominate; asks questions Clearly has done and prepared questions on virtually all readings; intelligently uses this understanding and these questions in discussion 15-19 Almost always Very Good: thoughtful comments and questions for the most part; willing, able and frequent contributor Has done most readings; provides competent analysis of reading when prompted by others 10-14 Frequent Good: has basic grasp of key concepts and occasional ideas on the main theme of the reading; arguments are sporadic and at times incomplete or poorly supported; unwilling to ask questions Displays familiarity with most readings, but tends not to analyze them or to relate them to the course material
9751B.docx