Cost to Council of $200K to Serious health Significant release of Public/media negative Temporary loss of Significant General Services There would 3: Moderate $2.5M impact on a pollutants attention key data. general reduction appreciable would be be isolated member of the in economic decline in regarded as expressions Fines to council personnel Residual pollution Local community Impact on public. performance services barely of concern requiring clean up concern generation of relative to current satisfactory about our More than 10 work management Customer/supplier forecasts by the capacity to days information. Isolated but significant concern general serve the rehabilitation instances of Temporary, public and community required for environmental recoverable the injured staff damage that might be service failure. member. reversed with personnel intensive efforts Cost to Council of $50K to Injury to staff Required to inform Inadequate probity Disruption to Individually Isolated but Services There would 2: Low $200K member results EPA being exercised system with some significant but noticeable would be be some in lost time. downtime. isolated areas of regarded as concern Contained temporary No evidence of examples of reduction in satisfactory about our pollution Corporate Governance Insignificant decline in economic by the capacity to impact on services Minor/isolated concerns Minor instances of performance general serve the raised by members of generation of environmental relative to current public but community information. public, customers, damage that could be forecasts personnel but it would suppliers. Brief service reversed would be not be interruption. aware of considered deficiencies serious Cost to Council below $50K Minor First Aid Minor release of Marginal impact on Minor disruption Minor shortfall There would Minor There would 1: Negligible required. pollutants which does Council operations to system with no relative to current be minor deficiencies be minor not require notification downtime. forecasts areas in which in principle concerns but Temporary, Minimal to no effect on to third parties the region that would they would minor health reputation Negligible impact was unable to pass without attract no impact on staff Brief, non-hazardous on service Resolved in day to day maintain its comment attention or public. temporary pollution provision. management current No environmental services damage City of Greater Geelong Risk Assessment Matrix - Continued Consequence Table – Corporate Context - Continued City of Greater Geelong Risk Assessment Matrix - Continued Likelihood Table – Corporate Context
3: Moderate Cost to Council of $200K to $2.5M Fines to council personnel Serious health impact on a member of the public. More than 10 days rehabilitation required for injured staff member. Significant release of pollutants Residual pollution requiring clean up work Isolated but significant instances of environmental damage that might be reversed with intensive efforts Public/media negative attention Local community concern Customer/supplier concern Temporary loss of key data. Impact on generation of management information. Temporary, recoverable service failure. Significant general reduction in economic performance relative to current forecasts General appreciable decline in services Services would be regarded as barely satisfactory by the general public and the personnel There would be isolated expressions of concern about our capacity to serve the community 2: Low Cost to Council of $50K to $200K Injury to staff member results in lost time. Required to inform EPA Contained temporary pollution Minor instances of environmental damage that could be reversed Inadequate probity being exercised No evidence of Corporate Governance Minor/isolated concerns raised by members of public, customers, suppliers. Disruption to system with some downtime. Insignificant impact on generation of information. Brief service interruption. Individually significant but isolated areas of reduction in economic performance relative to current forecasts Isolated but noticeable examples of decline in services Services would be regarded as satisfactory by the general public but personnel would be aware of deficiencies There would be some concern about our capacity to serve the community but it would not be considered serious 1: Negligible Cost to Council below $50K Minor First Aid required. Temporary, minor health impact on staff or public. Minor release of pollutants which does not require notification to third parties Brief, non-hazardous temporary pollution No environmental damage Marginal impact on Council operations Minimal to no effect on reputation Resolved in day to day management Minor disruption to system with no downtime. Negligible impact on service provision. Minor shortfall relative to current forecasts There would be minor areas in which the region was unable to maintain its current services Minor deficiencies in principle that would pass without comment There would be minor concerns but they would attract no attention City of Greater Geelong Risk Assessment Matrix - Continued Consequence Table – Corporate Context - Continued City of Greater Geelong Risk Assessment Matrix - Continued Likelihood Table – Corporate Context
8d1a226a9290eee-CoGG%20LLCIS%20%202014%20@%2018%20August%2014.docx