ASSESSMENT RUBRICS QUIZ LEVELS TOTAL MARKS-20 EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD FAIR AVERAGE CRITERIA 5 4 3 2 1 KNOWLEDGE Conceptually Lacks a Lacks basic Poor very sound sound few concepts understanding concepts Very well Well Thought Neither Lacks thought CRITICAL thought and thought but lacks adequately and logic. THINKING very logically and logic. thought nor answered. logically logically answered. delivered. Very well Well co- Well co- Good team No team TEAM WORK coordinated ordinated ordinated spirit but work, No and very good and very and good lacks team spirit. good team team spirit. spirit. TIME Vey prompt Prompt Not always Neither Takes long MANAGEMENT and adhere to and adhere prompt. prompt nor time to time. to time. adhere to respond. time. ASSESSMENT RUBRICSGROUP DISCUSSION CRITERIA LEVELS TOTAL MARKS-20 EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD FAIR AVERAGE 5 4 3 2 1 CONCEPT Conceptually very Conceptually Conceptually Lacks basic Poor sound sound good concepts understanding Student is audible, Student is Student is audible, Student is Student is not shows a high level audible, generates some audible. well spoken, of enthusiasm. enthusiastic, enthusiasm for the notaudible. Involves the class in encourages class topic SKILL a significant way in discussion and terms of both participation. participation and discussion. All arguments were Most arguments All arguments Arguments Arguments clearly tied to an were clearly tied were clearly tied were neither were idea to an idea and to an idea but the tied to the and ORGANISATION and organized in a organized in a organization was idea nor not tight logical fashion. logical fashion. not always clear or organized. organized. logical. Vey prompt and Prompt and Not always Neither Takes long TIME adhere to time. adhere to time. prompt. prompt nor time to MANAGEMENT adhere to respond. time.
ASSESSMENT RUBRICS QUIZ LEVELS TOTAL MARKS-20 CRITERIA EXCELLENT 5 VERY GOOD 4 GOOD 3 FAIR 2 AVERAGE 1 KNOWLEDGE Conceptually very sound sound Lacks a few concepts Lacks basic concepts Poor understanding CRITICAL THINKING Very well thought and very logically answered. Well thought and logically answered. Thought but lacks logic. Neither adequately thought nor logically delivered. Lacks thought and logic. TEAM WORK Very well coordinated and very good team spirit. Well co- ordinated and very good team spirit. Well co- ordinated and good team spirit. Good team spirit but lacks No team work, No TIME MANAGEMENT Vey prompt and adhere to time. Prompt and adhere to time. Not always prompt. Neither prompt nor adhere to time. Takes long time to respond. ASSESSMENT RUBRICSGROUP DISCUSSION CRITERIA LEVELS TOTAL MARKS-20 EXCELLENT 5 VERY GOOD 4 GOOD 3 FAIR 2 AVERAGE 1 CONCEPT Conceptually very sound Conceptually sound Conceptually good Lacks basic concepts Poor understanding SKILL Student is audible, shows a high level of enthusiasm. Involves the class in a significant way in terms of both participation and discussion. Student is audible, enthusiastic, encourages class discussion and participation. Student is audible, generates some enthusiasm for the topic Student is audible. Student is not well spoken, notaudible. ORGANISATION All arguments were clearly tied to an idea and organized in a tight logical fashion. Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea and organized in a logical fashion. All arguments were clearly tied to an idea but the organization was not always clear or logical. Arguments were neither tied to the idea nor organized. Arguments were and not organized. TIME MANAGEMENT Vey prompt and adhere to time. Prompt and adhere to time. Not always prompt. Neither prompt nor adhere to time. Takes long time to respond.
92529455so_sci.docx