Option Risks Timeframes Financials different policies and practices for each facility Redundancy payments due to the reduction of staff, in line with the reduced number of residents Additional running costs from maintaining two facilities including education, medical, administrative, catering and management teams for each site Construction costs (and land) of a ew detention facility Refurbishment cost of AYDC New facility to be used for at least 20 years Reduced salaries from reduction in staff, Investment in a large scale capital project Option 3: (all options) in line with the reduced number of could jeopardise funding for other youth Single residents (all sub-options) Construction to occur across two years justice initiatives in the short term (all ‘Purpose- (Options 3A – C) or three years (Options 3D) Redundancy payments due to the options) Built’ Secure reduction of staff, in line with the reduced DHHS would continue to run the AYDC This option prioritises the needs of young Detention facility while the new facility is being number of residents (all sub-options) people in the community where the new Facility (new designed and built (Options 3A – C) Salaries for new staff (Options 3A – C) facility is located in above other regions facility or DHHS to sell AYDC once the new Construction costs (and land) of a in Tasmania (all sub-options) completely facility is operational (Options 3A – C) new detention facility (Options 3A – The financial viability of this rebuild C) option depends on: AYDC) Other running costs estimated to be similar the sale of the AYDC site in a timely way to (Options 3A – C) AYDC (Options 3A – C) identifying an appropriate, Some revenue from selling site in Hobart or Launceston AYDC (Options 3A – C) (Options 3A – C) DoJ’s agreement to a joint facility that includes 18 – 21-year-olds (Option 3C only) designing and implementing a collaborative service delivery model with DoJ (Option 3C only)
Option Risks Timeframes Financials different policies and practices for each facility Redundancy payments due to the reduction of staff, in line with the reduced number of residents Additional running costs from maintaining two facilities including education, medical, administrative, catering and management teams for each site Construction costs (and land) of a ew detention facility Refurbishment cost of AYDC Option 3: Single ‘Purpose- Built’ Secure Detention Facility (new facility or completely rebuild AYDC) Investment in a large scale capital project could jeopardise funding for other youth justice initiatives in the short term (all options) This option prioritises the needs of young people in the community where the new facility is located in above other regions in Tasmania (all sub-options) The financial viability of this option depends on: the sale of the AYDC site in a timely way (Options 3A – C) identifying an appropriate, site in Hobart or Launceston (Options 3A – C) DoJ’s agreement to a joint facility that includes 18 – 21-year-olds (Option 3C only) designing and implementing a collaborative service delivery model with DoJ (Option 3C only) New facility to be used for at least 20 years (all options) Construction to occur across two years (Options 3A – C) or three years (Options 3D) DHHS would continue to run the AYDC facility while the new facility is being designed and built (Options 3A – C) DHHS to sell AYDC once the new facility is operational (Options 3A – C) Reduced salaries from reduction in staff, in line with the reduced number of residents (all sub-options) Redundancy payments due to the reduction of staff, in line with the reduced number of residents (all sub-options) Salaries for new staff (Options 3A – C) Construction costs (and land) of a new detention facility (Options 3A – C) Other running costs estimated to be similar to AYDC (Options 3A – C) Some revenue from selling AYDC (Options 3A – C)
99010_Custodial_Youth_Justice_Options_Paper_October_2016_-_Report_for_the_Tasmanian_Government.docx