to determine whether it is exempt from notice and comment procedures. Informal Agency To ensure that agencies Batterton v Marshall Procedural rules cover agency Rules- retain latitude in actions that do not Rules of Agency practice organizing their internal themselves alter the rights or & procdure operations, § 553 of the interests of parties, although APA exempts rules of it may alter the manner in agency practice and which parties present procedure from notice & themselves or their comment procedures. viewpoints to the agency. Unlike police statements Thus, if a rule has a and interpretative rules, substantial impact on the however, these rules may conduct outside the have binding effects, proceeding itself, it is not particularly when they non-legislative provide procedural benefits for affected parties. American Hosp. Ass’n Value judgment test: Even v Bowen (DC CIR) unambiguously procedural measures affect parties to some degree. Thus, the court’s approach is shifted from asking wehether there is a substantial impact to whether the agency action also encodes a substantive value judgment or puts a stamp of approval or disapproval on a given type of behavior But see JEM Rules that embody a broadcasting (DC judgement about what CIR) overruling the mechanics and processes are value judgment test : most efficient are procedural. denied JEMS Thus, exemptions argument that FCC’s demonstrate instances were rule to deny any interests promoted by public application with participation in rulemaking missing information are outweighed by without opportunity countervailing considerations to cure a effect. of effectiveness, efficiency, expedition and reduction in expense Chao v Rothermel (3d Whether the rule alters cir. P 747) existing standards, or places additional burdens. If it does not determine substantive rights, but rather outline a plan, t is procedural Estate of Shapiro v The rule is binding if Commissioner of the rule prescribed
to determine whether it is exempt from notice and comment procedures. Informal Agency Rules- Rules of Agency practice & procdure To ensure that agencies retain latitude in organizing their internal operations, § 553 of the APA exempts rules of agency practice and procedure from notice & comment procedures. Unlike police statements and interpretative rules, however, these rules may have binding effects, particularly when they provide procedural benefits for affected parties. Batterton v Marshall Procedural rules cover agency actions that do not themselves alter the rights or interests of parties, although it may alter the manner in which parties present themselves or their viewpoints to the agency. Thus, if a rule has a substantial impact on the conduct outside the proceeding itself, it is not non-legislative American Hosp. Ass’n v Bowen (DC CIR) Value judgment test: Even unambiguously procedural measures affect parties to some degree. Thus, the court’s approach is shifted from asking wehether there is a substantial impact to whether the agency action also encodes a substantive value judgment or puts a stamp of approval or disapproval on a given type of behavior But see JEM broadcasting (DC CIR) overruling the value judgment test : denied JEMS argument that FCC’s rule to deny any application with missing information without opportunity to cure a effect. Rules that embody a judgement about what mechanics and processes are most efficient are procedural. Thus, exemptions demonstrate instances were interests promoted by public participation in rulemaking are outweighed by countervailing considerations of effectiveness, efficiency, expedition and reduction in expense Chao v Rothermel (3d cir. P 747) Whether the rule alters existing standards, or places additional burdens. If it does not determine substantive rights, but rather outline a plan, t is procedural Estate of Shapiro v Commissioner of The rule is binding if the rule prescribed
Administrative%20Law%20-%20Glicksman%20-%20Fall%202010.docx