Claim 4 Claim missing Reasoning unclear or does not Evidence #1 with citation 2 demonstrate link to claim Document(s) not cited Reasoning links evidence/claim 5 Evidence doesn’t support claim Evidence #2 with citation 2 Reasoning links evidence/claim 5 Language Choices 2 Total 20_____________________ A level B Level C Level D level F Level The Claim Presents a clear, Presents a clear claim Presents a claim using Claim is confusing or Missing claim well-developed I and/or with limited underdeveloped. /strong claim. development Might have used I. Evidence Supports claim with 2 Supports claim with 2 Supports claim with 2 Provides minimal, Evidence is missing substantial, relevant, substantial, relevant, pieces of evidence. irrelevant, or and accurate pieces and accurate pieces insufficient evidence. of evidence. Evidence of evidence. is cited. Reasoning Reasoning linking Reasoning linking Only links 1 piece of Reasoning used does There is no clear evidence (Both pieces evidence (both pieces evidence soundly to not link evidence to reasoning of evidence) to claim of evidence) to claim the claim claim is sound and logical. is sound It helps persuade the reader. Language Choices Uses sophisticated Uses words, phrases Inconsistently uses Attempts once to use Language choices words, phrases and and clauses to clarify words or phrases to words or phrases to creates uncertainty clauses to clarify the the relationship and clarify the clarify the relationship and create cohesion btw relationship btw relationship btw create cohesion btw claim, evidence and claim, evidence and claim, evidence and the claim, evidence reasoning reasoning reasoning and reasoning.
Claim 4 Claim missing Reasoning unclear or does not demonstrate link to claim Document(s) not cited Evidence doesn’t support claim Evidence #1 with citation 2 Reasoning links evidence/claim 5 Evidence #2 with citation 2 Reasoning links evidence/claim 5 Language Choices 2 Total 20_____________________ A level B Level C Level D level F Level The Claim Presents a clear, well-developed /strong claim. Presents a clear claim Presents a claim using I and/or with limited development Claim is confusing or underdeveloped. Might have used I. Missing claim Evidence Supports claim with 2 substantial, relevant, and accurate pieces of evidence. Evidence is cited. Supports claim with 2 substantial, relevant, and accurate pieces of evidence. Supports claim with 2 pieces of evidence. Provides minimal, irrelevant, or insufficient evidence. Evidence is missing Reasoning Reasoning linking evidence (Both pieces of evidence) to claim is sound and logical. It helps persuade the reader. Reasoning linking evidence (both pieces of evidence) to claim is sound Only links 1 piece of evidence soundly to the claim Reasoning used does not link evidence to claim There is no clear reasoning Language Choices Uses sophisticated words, phrases and clauses to clarify the relationship and create cohesion btw the claim, evidence and reasoning. Uses words, phrases and clauses to clarify the relationship and create cohesion btw claim, evidence and reasoning Inconsistently uses words or phrases to clarify the relationship btw claim, evidence and reasoning Attempts once to use words or phrases to clarify the relationship btw claim, evidence and reasoning Language choices creates uncertainty
7DL-When-are-public-protests-appropriate.docx