B. Experience and expertise are shared This objective aims to improve the effectiveness of management by sharing experience and expertise on key topics. C. Acceptance of management is increased The public opinion concerning goose management can be highly polarised and often represents an obstacle to rational and cost-effective management measures. Creating a better acceptance can thus contribute to the de-escalation of the conflict. D. Relevant national legislation is harmonised Implementation of a dynamic management framework requires frequent update of hunting regulations and derogations regulations in the of monitoring data. E. Sufficient resources are secured on long-term basis Adaptive management of the population is not possible without long-term funding to maintain the capacity for monitoring, assessment and implementation. Table 3 sets out the actions for each means and process objective together with their priorities, time scale and responsible organisations. Table 3. Framework for action Organisations Means/Process Actions Priority Time scale FOs responsible objectives I A network of 1.1 Provide adequate protection Essential Short / National safe key sites is and management to key Rolling authorities V maintained and of international importance VII managed under Article 4(2) of the throughout the Birds Directive in the EU population’s and other relevant range instruments in other Range States throughout the range of the population and maintain them in good ecological status 1.2 Promote goose-based Medium Medium National tourism at selected key sites authorities, NGOs II are kept 2.1 Take key sites for geese into High Immediate / National away from account in land use planning Rolling authorities III sensitive areas and growing of sensitive IV crops
B. Experience and expertise are shared This objective aims to improve the effectiveness of management by sharing experience and expertise on key topics. C. Acceptance of management is increased The public opinion concerning goose management can be highly polarised and often represents an obstacle to rational and cost-effective management measures. Creating a better acceptance can thus contribute to the de-escalation of the conflict. D. Relevant national legislation is harmonised Implementation of a dynamic management framework requires frequent update of hunting regulations and derogations regulations in the of monitoring data. E. Sufficient resources are secured on long-term basis Adaptive management of the population is not possible without long-term funding to maintain the capacity for monitoring, assessment and implementation. Table 3 sets out the actions for each means and process objective together with their priorities, time scale and responsible organisations. Table 3. Framework for action FOs Means/Process objectives Actions Priority Time scale Organisations responsible I V VII A network of safe key sites is maintained and managed throughout the population’s range 1.1 Provide adequate protection and management to key of international importance under Article 4(2) of the Birds Directive in the EU and other relevant instruments in other Range States throughout the range of the population and maintain them in good ecological status Essential Short / Rolling National authorities 1.2 Promote goose-based at selected key sites Medium Medium National authorities, NGOs II III IV are kept away from sensitive areas 2.1 Take key sites for geese into account in land use planning and growing of sensitive crops High Immediate / Rolling National authorities tourism
aewa_mop7_27_draft_gg_issmp_en.docx