household policy makers to of key questions the survey easy to include because they have expenditure eg make more in household instrument. additional a stronger and household informed income surveys Should help policy questions. Some more objective expenditure data decisions: eg scale that are relevant makers target capacity evidence base to on tobacco, and trends of to policy makers revenue policies constraints in defend policies. alcohol, sugar tobacco addressing NCDs more accurately, some countries to sweetened drinks, consumption, and (the actual and estimate the actively interpret and / or out of prevalence questions will be welfare and use the data. pocket amongst lowest very implications for expenditure on two wealth Within the poorest two health. quintiles. two years, quintiles of any evidence that the policy measures. expanded survey questionnaire has then been analysed and used by policy makers to formulate NCD and broader health policy. Where possible, Pacific Islands Consistency, Minor cost. Technically Allows make the share some where possible, in feasible. comparisons. questions common the survey consistent challenges when questionnaire between addressing NCDs. between countries so that countries. comparisons can
household expenditure eg household expenditure data on tobacco, alcohol, sugar sweetened drinks, and / or out of pocket expenditure on health. Where possible, make the questions consistent between countries so that comparisons can policy makers to make more informed decisions: eg scale and trends of tobacco consumption, and prevalence amongst lowest two wealth quintiles. Pacific Islands share some common challenges when addressing NCDs. of key questions in household income surveys that are relevant to policy makers addressing NCDs (the actual questions will be very Within two years, evidence that the expanded survey questionnaire has then been analysed and used by policy makers to formulate NCD and broader health policy. Consistency, where possible, in the survey questionnaire between countries. the survey instrument. Should help policy makers target revenue policies more accurately, and estimate the welfare implications for the poorest two quintiles of any policy measures. Minor cost. easy to include additional questions. Some capacity constraints in some countries to actively interpret and use the data. Technically feasible. because they have a stronger and more objective evidence base to defend policies. Allows comparisons.
893050WP0P13040PUBLIC00NCD0Roadmap.docx