that it has adequate capacity to implement, coordinate and manage the operation. Moreover, the project will be providing capacity to the implementing entity, and developing a clear institutional framework for execution to streamline the process and ensure successful completion of tasks. In addition, the MENA TA Facility will be investing in the capacity building of EFSA to manage and implement projects. Resp: Bank/ Stage: Recurrent: Due Date: March 25, Status: Completed EFSA Prep. 2014 Moderate 2.2. Governance Rating EFSA is financially Close attention will be paid to key governance factors in consultation with Description: Risk Management: and administratively independent, EFSA as the preparation work proceeds and ORAF will be updated accordingly. and operates under a mandate established under law. There is no significant governance risks associated with the key implementing partner (EFSA) as such. Resp: Stage: Recurrent: Due Date: March 25, Frequency: Status: EFSA/Bank Prep. 2014 Completed 3. Project Risks 3.1. Design Rating Low Description: Lack of Risk Management: Longer-term consultants and capacity building and training to EFSA staff to provide expertise on relevant support from the onset and during project implementation will build sustainable capacity and minimize technical subjects may this risk. delay the project implementation. Resp: EFSA Stage: Impl. Recurrent: Due Date: March 31, Frequency: Status: Ongoing 2014 /Bank Low 3.2. Social and Rating Environmental
that it has adequate capacity to implement, coordinate and manage the operation. Moreover, the project will be providing capacity to the implementing entity, and developing a clear institutional framework for execution to streamline the process and ensure successful completion of tasks. In addition, the MENA TA Facility will be investing in the capacity building of EFSA to manage and implement projects. Resp: Bank/ EFSA Stage: Prep. Recurrent: Due Date: March 25, 2014 Status: Completed 2.2. Governance Rating Moderate Description: EFSA is financially and administratively independent, and operates under a mandate established under law. There is no significant governance risks associated with the key implementing partner (EFSA) as such. Risk Management: Close attention will be paid to key governance factors in consultation with EFSA as the preparation work proceeds and ORAF will be updated accordingly. Resp: EFSA/Bank Stage: Prep. Recurrent: Due Date: March 25, 2014 Frequency: Status: Completed 3. Project Risks 3.1. Design Rating Low Description: Lack of expertise on relevant technical subjects may delay the project implementation. Risk Management: Longer-term consultants and capacity building and training to EFSA staff to provide support from the onset and during project implementation will build sustainable capacity and minimize this risk. Resp: EFSA /Bank Stage: Impl. Recurrent: Due Date: March 31, 2014 Frequency: Status: Ongoing 3.2. Social and Environmental Rating Low
89569-PAD-P149677-Box394838B-PUBLIC-English-version.docx