Code Project title Date Approved Funds Balances Balances Support cost Why any When Project completed funding plus disbursed as committed on balances balances could they could subject to (Actual) adjustments of as per committed not be be decision as of 80th 80th as per and not- returned? returned? 31 meeting meeting 80th committed December (US$) (US$) meeting as per 2016 (US$) (US$) 80th meeting (US$) UNEP BAH/PHA/59/TAS/21 Terminal phase-out management plan Dec-14 95,000 33,054 61,946 8,053 Balances (second tranche) transferred and committed to HPMP project (ref. decision 68/33) DJI/SEV/70/INS/20 Extension of the institutional 60,000 35,996 24,004 0 strengthening project (phase V: GAB/PHA/62/TAS/26 HCFC phase-out management plan (stage Dec-15 90,000 85,000 650 I, first tranche) KUW/PHA/52/TAS/10 Terminal phase-out management plan for Jan-16 240,000 17,243 222,757 28,958 MYA Annex A Group I substances (first tranche) LIR/SEV/69/INS/20 Extension of the institutional May-16 85,213 65,713 19,500 0 strengthening project (phase V: PRC/SEV/71/INS/25 Extension of the institutional Dec-15 60,000 45,084 14,916 0 strengthening project (phase VIII: QAT/PHA/59/TAS/14 Terminal phase-out management plan Dec-14 55,000 0 55,000 7,150 Balance was (second tranche) transferred and committed to HPMP as per decision 65/45 STP/SEV/63/INS/20 Extension of the institutional Mar-13 60,666 33,332 27,334 0 strengthening project (phase III) YEM/PHA/60/TAS/35 National ODS phase-out plan (second Dec-14 140,000 0 140,000 18,200 Amount not tranche) commited however according to ExCom decision (77), projects to be frozen until security situation is resovled. UNEP understanding is funds to be kept with it.
Code Project title Date completed (Actual) Approved funding plus adjustments as of 31 December 2016 (US$) Funds disbursed as of 80th meeting (US$) Balances committed as per 80th meeting (US$) Balances as per 80th meeting (US$) Support cost on balances committed and not- committed as per 80th meeting (US$) Why any balances could not be returned? When they could be returned? Project subject to decision UNEP BAH/PHA/59/TAS/21 Terminal phase-out management plan (second tranche) Dec-14 95,000 33,054 61,946 8,053 Balances transferred and committed to HPMP project (ref. decision 68/33) DJI/SEV/70/INS/20 Extension of the institutional strengthening project (phase V: 60,000 35,996 24,004 0 GAB/PHA/62/TAS/26 HCFC phase-out management plan (stage I, first tranche) Dec-15 90,000 85,000 650 KUW/PHA/52/TAS/10 Terminal phase-out management plan for Annex A Group I substances (first tranche) Jan-16 240,000 17,243 222,757 28,958 MYA LIR/SEV/69/INS/20 Extension of the institutional strengthening project (phase V: May-16 85,213 65,713 19,500 0 PRC/SEV/71/INS/25 Extension of the institutional strengthening project (phase VIII: Dec-15 60,000 45,084 14,916 0 QAT/PHA/59/TAS/14 Terminal phase-out management plan (second tranche) Dec-14 55,000 0 55,000 7,150 Balance was transferred and committed to HPMP as per decision 65/45 STP/SEV/63/INS/20 Extension of the institutional strengthening project (phase III) Mar-13 60,666 33,332 27,334 0 YEM/PHA/60/TAS/35 National ODS phase-out plan (second tranche) Dec-14 140,000 0 140,000 18,200 Amount not commited however according to ExCom decision (77), projects to be frozen until security situation is resovled. UNEP understanding is funds to be kept with it.
8004.docx