Grades: Argument Research- 100 Points- Daily Grade Draft of Argument Introduction- 100 Points- Summative Assessment Counter-Claim Research- 100 Points- Daily Grade Students’ Grade- 100 Points- Formative Assessment Rubric Grade- 100 Points- Summative Assessment Rubric: Levels of Performance Criteria 1 2 3 4 1. Organization and Unclear in most Clear in some Mostly clear and Completely clear Clarity: parts parts but not orderly in all and orderly viewpoints and over all parts presentation responses are outlined both clearly and orderly. 2. Use of Arguments: Few or no Some relevant Many reasons Most relevant reasons are given to relevant reasons reasons given given: fairly reasons given in support viewpoint. given relevant support 3. Use of Examples and Few or no Some relevant Many Most relevant Facts: relevant examples/facts examples/facts supporting examples examples and facts are supporting given given: fairly and facts given given to support examples/facts relevant reasons, with references 4. Use of Rebuttal: No effective Few effective Some effective Many effective arguments made by counter-arguments the other teams are made responded to and dealt made made made with effectively. 5. Presentation Style: Few style Few style All style features All style features tone of voice, use of features were features were were used, most were used gestures, and level of used; not used but they convincingly convincingly enthusiasm are convincingly were used convincing to audience. convincingly Total: ______ Score = Total x 5 = ________
Grades: Argument Research- 100 Points- Daily Grade Draft of Argument Introduction- 100 Points- Summative Assessment Counter-Claim Research- 100 Points- Daily Grade Students’ Grade- 100 Points- Formative Assessment Rubric Grade- 100 Points- Summative Assessment Rubric: Levels of Performance Criteria 1 2 3 4 1. Organization and Clarity: viewpoints and responses are outlined both clearly and orderly. Unclear in most parts Clear in some parts but not over all Mostly clear and orderly in all parts Completely clear and orderly presentation 2. Use of Arguments: reasons are given to support viewpoint. Few or no relevant reasons given Some relevant reasons given Many reasons given: fairly relevant Most relevant reasons given in support 3. Use of Examples and Facts: examples and facts are given to support reasons, with references Few or no relevant supporting examples/facts Some relevant examples/facts given Many examples/facts given: fairly relevant Most relevant supporting examples and facts given 4. Use of Rebuttal: arguments made by the other teams are responded to and dealt with effectively. No effective made Few effective made Some effective made Many effective counter-arguments made 5. Presentation Style: tone of voice, use of gestures, and level of enthusiasm are convincing to audience. Few style features were used; not convincingly Few style features were used but they were used convincingly All style features were used, most convincingly All style features were used convincingly Total: ______ Score = Total x 5 = ________
ac_unit_2_ea2.docx