performance of fielded end items, and how the Product Support Strategy, contracts, and other sections deliver these required sustainment outcomes. Military Departments establish sustainment performance outcomes for their mission-essential systems and equipment. These desired outcomes are expressed as program requirements in the form of Key Performance Parameters (KPPs), Key System Attributes (KSAs), Additional Program Attributes (APAs) or other working level or Component-specific sustainment requirements in Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) requirements documentation (i.e., Initial Capabilities Documents, Capability Development Documents, Capabilities Production Documents). These and other Component, OSD (e.g., supply chain attributes) or other requirements are detailed in Requests for Proposal (RFP), contracts or other documents and reporting systems. 2.1 Sustainment Performance Requirements The LCSP must identify all explicit, implicit or derived sustainment requirements in all requirements or other program documentati). These must be traceable to the program’s execution planning documents (e.g., RFP, contract, program support agreement) in which a metric is used to manage sustainment performance. For programs with goals that are to improve as the program evolves, indicate the planned evaluation timeframe and list the planned value from reliability growth curves or other projects and the expected timeframe for achieving the threshold/objective. For each sustainment requirement, identify are KPP/KSA/APAs, their authoritative requirements document, threshold and objective values, the specific section in the RFP/contract where that requirement is specified, section of the Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) covering that metric, along with projected values at IOC, Full Operational Capability (FOC), and full fielding. As a program progresses through its life-cycle, LCSP updates for programs in operation should incorporate and list sustainment requirements from modernization and upgrade programs and any other Service or OSD sustainment reporting metrics not contained in the original requirements or execution planning documents. AFLCMC Clarifying Guidance: Purpose of this section is to identify how your program is/planning to measure product support effectiveness to include how the program office is planning to link user requirements to contractual requirements. If your program does not have formal KPP/KSAs defined, this section and subsequent tables should be tailored to capture the intent of this section how are you measuring/monitoring product support /supportability for – your program?
performance of fielded end items, and how the Product Support Strategy, contracts, and other sections deliver these required sustainment outcomes. Military Departments establish sustainment performance outcomes for their mission-essential systems and equipment. These desired outcomes are expressed as program requirements in the form of Key Performance Parameters (KPPs), Key System Attributes (KSAs), Additional Program Attributes (APAs) or other working level or Component-specific sustainment requirements in Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) requirements documentation (i.e., Initial Capabilities Documents, Capability Development Documents, Capabilities Production Documents). These and other Component, OSD (e.g., supply chain attributes) or other requirements are detailed in Requests for Proposal (RFP), contracts or other documents and reporting systems. 2.1 Sustainment Performance Requirements The LCSP must identify all explicit, implicit or derived sustainment requirements in all requirements or other program documentati). These must be traceable to the program’s execution planning documents (e.g., RFP, contract, program support agreement) in which a metric is used to manage sustainment performance. For programs with goals that are to improve as the program evolves, indicate the planned evaluation timeframe and list the planned value from reliability growth curves or other projects and the expected timeframe for achieving the threshold/objective. For each sustainment requirement, identify are KPP/KSA/APAs, their authoritative requirements document, threshold and objective values, the specific section in the RFP/contract where that requirement is specified, section of the Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) covering that metric, along with projected values at IOC, Full Operational Capability (FOC), and full fielding. As a program progresses through its life-cycle, LCSP updates for programs in operation should incorporate and list sustainment requirements from modernization and upgrade programs and any other Service or OSD sustainment reporting metrics not contained in the original requirements or execution planning documents. AFLCMC Clarifying Guidance: Purpose of this section is to identify how your program is/planning to measure product support effectiveness to include how the program office is planning to link user requirements to contractual requirements. If your program does not have formal KPP/KSAs defined, this section and subsequent tables should be tailored to capture the intent of this section – how are you measuring/monitoring product support /supportability for your program?
AFLCMC%20LCSP%20Sample%20Outline%20Nov%2017%20(aligned%20with%20DoD%20Jan%2017%20Version%202.0).docx