Table 11: Result Based Monitoring Framework Indicators Units of Cumulative Target Values (FYs) Data Source/ Measure Methodology Year 1 Year 1I Year Year (15-16) 1II 1V ( 16-17) (17-18) Income % 0% 5% 10% 20% 40% Yearly Mid term& End term 50 % of households increase evaluation & Studies mobilized report a 40 % increase in average HH in income income over the baseline % 0% 5% 10% 20% 30% Yearly MIS, Mid term& End 30 % of households increase term evaluation & reporting additional sources of HH income over the in Studies baseline income source 60 % of SC/ST households % 0% 5% 10% 25% 50% Yearly Mid term& End term increase evaluation & Studies mobilized into SHGs report 50 % increase in average in income HH income over the baseline Portfolio of Assets % HH 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Yearly Mid term& End term At least 20% of households evaluation & Studies report increased productive and sustainable asset base Reduction in Distress Migration % 0% 5% 10% 25% 50% Yearly Mid term& End term Decline in 50 % of mobilised HHs undertaking decline evaluation & Studies distress migration
Table 11: Result Based Monitoring Framework Indicators Units of Measure Cumulative Target Values (FYs) Data Source/ Methodology Year 1 Year 1I (15-16) Year 1II ( 16-17) Year 1V (17-18) Income 50 % of households mobilized report a 40 % increase in average HH income over the baseline % increase in income 0% 5% 10% 20% 40% Yearly Mid term& End term evaluation & Studies 30 % of households reporting additional sources of HH income over the baseline % increase in income source 0% 5% 10% 20% 30% Yearly MIS, Mid term& End term evaluation & Studies 60 % of SC/ST households mobilized into SHGs report 50 % increase in average HH income over the baseline % increase in income 0% 5% 10% 25% 50% Yearly Mid term& End term evaluation & Studies Portfolio of Assets At least 20% of households report increased productive and sustainable asset base % HH 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Yearly Mid term& End term evaluation & Studies Reduction in Distress Migration Decline in 50 % of mobilised HHs undertaking distress migration % decline 0% 5% 10% 25% 50% Yearly Mid term& End term evaluation & Studies
AAP_2015_16_FINAL-VERSION-24th-MARCH-15.docx