Paper occasionally skips around without adequate transitions • Not Good Good Excellent Assessment Criteria: Enough Score The team 6score<9 9score10 0 score <6 made good use of time, presenting neither too much nor /10 too little information designed and made effective use of PowerPoint slides /10 and/or other audio/visual media coordinated well with one another, defining clear roles and /10 distributing time and tasks engaged the audience effectively /10 organized the material effectively (presentation was /10 unified, coherent, and developed) showed a detailed understanding of the assigned readings /30 (x 3) selected a relevant current event and applied course /30 content to it, effectively and meaningfully (x 3) stimulated discussion and answered questions well (x 2) /20 identified and used credible information sources, including /10 course readings Showed critical thinking, considering divergent /10 perspectives on the issues at hand Total Score/ 150 Comments: T Knowledge of subject is adequate but not deep • Controlling idea is supported but not extensively • Conclusions are incomplete or do not follow directly from the information presented • Information sources are flawed or accepted uncritically • Approach to subject lacks creativity, mastery • Rubric, Team Presentation 1: On Deck (Readings and Current Events) Rubric, Essay 1: Enron and the Sarbanes–Oxley Act
• Paper occasionally skips around without adequate transitions T • Knowledge of subject is adequate but not deep • Controlling idea is supported but not extensively • Conclusions are incomplete or do not follow directly from the information presented • Information sources are flawed or accepted uncritically • Approach to subject lacks creativity, mastery Assessment Criteria: The team Not Good Enough 0 score <6 Good 6score<9 Excellent 9score10 Score made good use of time, presenting neither too much nor too little information /10 designed and made effective use of PowerPoint slides and/or other audio/visual media /10 coordinated well with one another, defining clear roles and distributing time and tasks /10 engaged the audience effectively /10 organized the material effectively (presentation was unified, coherent, and developed) /10 showed a detailed understanding of the assigned readings (x 3) /30 selected a relevant current event and applied course content to it, effectively and meaningfully (x 3) /30 stimulated discussion and answered questions well (x 2) /20 identified and used credible information sources, including course readings /10 Showed critical thinking, considering divergent perspectives on the issues at hand /10 Total Score/ 150 Comments: Rubric, Team Presentation 1: On Deck (Readings and Current Events) Rubric, Essay 1: Enron and the Sarbanes–Oxley Act
933.610.docx