3.25 A "facility specific" waste waste management programme for each “a UK 35 management programme may be facility, integrated with all other relevant Clar insufficient. Cross- site planning is programmes” required on multi-facility sites (i.e. integrated site-wide strategies and programmes). 3.25 In the case To correct the English as in DS448 where…. Edit UK 36 line 1 CAN 14 3.26 Change ‘At an early state in the lifetime’ to Otherwise the timing of this seems X ‘Prior to licensing… to conflict with 3.9? 3rd sentence: new facilities, features “For edit GER3 19 3.26 Ensure consistency with Para 3.20 that will facilitate decommissioning should of this document as well as with be taken into consideration at the design the Draft Safety Requirements stage; such features should be included in DS450 “Decommissioning of the initial decommissioning plan …” Facilities” (revision of WS-R-5), see Paras 7.3 and 7.4 of the final version dated 20 November 2013 (approved at the 34th CSS meeting in November 2013). last sentence: facilities without a “For existing Clarification with regard to the decommissioning plan, such a plan should responsibility for preparing the be prepared by the operating organization as decommissioning plan. soon as possible.” 3.26 Delete This paragraph is concerned with UK 37 decommissioning plans and not the management of radioactive wastes. There is adequate relevant guidance on the topic of decommissioning plans in alternative Safety Guides. 3.26 Consider inserting a para on the safety case Possible omission and consistency UK 39 as in DS448 with DS448 3.26 Insert: The decommissioning plan should be Omission UK 38
Clar UK 35 3.25 “a waste management programme for each facility, integrated with all other relevant programmes” A "facility specific" waste management programme may be insufficient. Cross- site planning is required on multi-facility sites (i.e. integrated site-wide strategies and programmes). Edit UK 36 3.25 line 1 In the case where…. To correct the English as in DS448 CAN 14 3.26 Change ‘At an early state in the lifetime’ to ‘Prior to licensing… Otherwise the timing of this seems to conflict with 3.9? X edit GER3 19 3.26 3rd sentence: “For new facilities, features that will facilitate decommissioning should be taken into consideration at the design stage; such features should be included in the initial decommissioning plan …” last sentence: “For existing facilities without a decommissioning plan, such a plan should be prepared by the operating organization as soon as possible.” Ensure consistency with Para 3.20 of this document as well as with the Draft Safety Requirements DS450 “Decommissioning of Facilities” (revision of WS-R-5), see Paras 7.3 and 7.4 of the final version dated 20 November 2013 (approved at the 34th CSS meeting in November 2013). Clarification with regard to the responsibility for preparing the decommissioning plan. UK 37 3.26 Delete This paragraph is concerned with decommissioning plans and not the management of radioactive wastes. There is adequate relevant guidance on the topic of decommissioning plans in alternative Safety Guides. UK 39 3.26 Consider inserting a para on the safety case as in DS448 Possible omission and consistency with DS448 UK 38 3.26 Insert: The decommissioning plan should be Omission
a%20Consolidated%20MS%20Comments%20DS447.docx