Critical component Thirteen different Tasmanian wetland Maintenance of the extant TASVEG Based on the limited Low: Vegetation types vegetation communities were vegetation communities on site at available vegetation Not confident in the data identified within ECCBIL which time of listing i.e. data i.e. TASVEG and not confident that corresponds to six TASVEG mapping, the this will represent a lacustrine herbland (AHL) Critical service: communities. Kirkpatrick and change in ecological freshwater aquatic sedgeland and Natural or near-natural Harwood (1981) Sixteen flora species have been character. rushland (ASF) wetland ecosystem survey and expert recorded on site that are threatened Limited information freshwater aquatic herbland (AHF) opinion. in Tasmania. about the variability in saline aquatic herbland (AHS) Vegetation succession is an integral extent and condition of saline sedgeland/rushland (ARS) component of the ECCBIL wetlands the vegetation types such that some changes in vegetation since the time of listing is succulent saline herbland (ASS). communities are normal. available. Difficult to describe . baseline condition and variability (refer to Chapter 7 of ECD). Exceeding or not meeting a LAC does not automatically indicate that there has been a change in ecological character.
Critical component Vegetation types Critical service: Natural or near-natural wetland ecosystem Thirteen different Tasmanian wetland vegetation communities were identified within ECCBIL which corresponds to six TASVEG communities. Sixteen flora species have been recorded on site that are threatened in Tasmania. Vegetation succession is an integral component of the ECCBIL wetlands such that some changes in vegetation communities are normal. Maintenance of the extant TASVEG vegetation communities on site at time of listing i.e. lacustrine herbland (AHL) freshwater aquatic sedgeland and rushland (ASF) freshwater aquatic herbland (AHF) saline aquatic herbland (AHS) saline sedgeland/rushland (ARS) succulent saline herbland (ASS). . Based on the limited available vegetation data i.e. TASVEG mapping, the Kirkpatrick and Harwood (1981) survey and expert opinion. Low: Not confident in the data and not confident that this will represent a change in ecological character. Limited information about the variability in extent and condition of the vegetation types since the time of listing is available. Difficult to describe baseline condition and variability (refer to Chapter 7 of ECD). Exceeding or not meeting a LAC does not automatically indicate that there has been a change in ecological character.
8-ecd.docx