Total Unique Total Direct indirect indirect Effect Effect effect effect Model Mediator (c) x b) (a x b) 95% CI (c’) (∑a 1 0.71* 0.13 0.58* 0.39-0.79 Experiential 0.23* 0.10-0.41 avoidance Thought 0.14* 0.01-0.29 suppression Behavioral 0.18* 0.09-0.33 avoidance Loss-reality 0.02 -0.05-0.10 avoidance 2 0.15* 0.02 0.13* 0.07-0.18 Experiential 0.04* 0.01-0.09 avoidance Thought 0.00 -0.04-0.03 suppression Behavioral 0.09* 0.05-0.13 avoidance Loss-reality 0.00 -0.02-0.02 avoidance Note: * = significant at < .05. p Table 3 Summary of the post-hoc mediation analyses uncontrolled for symptom levels in which avoidance processes mediate the relationship between grief rumination and symptoms of complicated grief (Model 1) and depression (Model 2). Total Unique Total Direct indirect indirect
Model Mediator Total Effect (c) Direct Effect (c’) Total indirect effect (∑a x b) Unique indirect effect (a x b) 95% CI 1 0.71* 0.13 0.58* 0.39-0.79 Experiential avoidance 0.23* 0.10-0.41 Thought suppression 0.14* 0.01-0.29 Behavioral avoidance 0.18* 0.09-0.33 Loss-reality avoidance 0.02 -0.05-0.10 2 0.15* 0.02 0.13* 0.07-0.18 Experiential avoidance 0.04* 0.01-0.09 Thought suppression 0.00 -0.04-0.03 Behavioral avoidance 0.09* 0.05-0.13 Loss-reality avoidance 0.00 -0.02-0.02 Note: * = significant at p < .05. Table 3 Summary of the post-hoc mediation analyses uncontrolled for symptom levels in which avoidance processes mediate the relationship between grief rumination and symptoms of complicated grief (Model 1) and depression (Model 2). Total Direct Total indirect Unique indirect
ABN-ABN3-Eisma20131100-M-RR-F1.docx