Economic evaluation scenarios: stage one. Bay West design for 14,000 TEU – ships. No upgrade of channel through Hastings minimum rail design for 14,000 TEU – the Heads. Required upgrades to the ships. The port uses the existing rail existing rail network completed in stage connection via the Stony Point and Frankston one. line. The new line from Hastings to Lyndhurst and Regional Rail East are not constructed. As Hastings design for 14,000 TEU – a result, rail capacity is severely limited by the ships, including rail connections and constraints of the existing network. with Regional Rail East constructed in Figure 39. Capital cost to expand capacity at Bay West Source: Deloitte for Infrastructure Victoria Figure 39 and 40 show the tranches of capacity expansion and capital cost profile for the economic evaluation scenarios at Bay West and Hastings. Figure 40. Capital cost to expand capacity at Hastings Source: Deloitte for Infrastructure Victoria
Economic evaluation scenarios: Bay West – design for 14,000 TEU ships. No upgrade of channel through the Heads. Required upgrades to the existing rail network completed in stage one. Hastings – design for 14,000 TEU ships, including rail connections and with Regional Rail East constructed in stage one. Hastings minimum rail – design for 14,000 TEU ships. The port uses the existing rail connection via the Stony Point and Frankston line. The new line from Hastings to Lyndhurst and Regional Rail East are not constructed. As a result, rail capacity is severely limited by the constraints of the existing network. Figure 39. Capital cost to expand capacity at Bay West Source: Deloitte for Infrastructure Victoria Figure 39 and 40 show the tranches of capacity expansion and capital cost profile for the economic evaluation scenarios at Bay West and Hastings. Figure 40. Capital cost to expand capacity at Hastings Source: Deloitte for Infrastructure Victoria
Advice_on_securing_Victorias_ports_-_accessible_version_-_FINAL.docx