(1G) A person, without reasonable excuse, must not S. 13(1G) attend an event or place where a person is using inserted by No. 60/2015 an animal as a lure or kill— s. 10(1). (a) for the purpose of blooding a greyhound; or (b) in connection with the training or racing of any coursing dog. Penalty: 120 penalty units. S. 13(2) (2) In any prosecution under subsection (1), (1A), amended by (1B), (1C), (1D) or (1E), evidence in writing by a Nos 77/1995 s. 10(2), veterinary practitioner who is employed, or who 74/2000 practises on his or her own behalf, as a veterinary s. 3(Sch. 1 pathologist that an animal was alive at the time of item 101), 103/2003 s. 35, its attack by a dog is prima facie evidence that the 60/2015 animal was alive at the time of that attack. s. 10(2). S. 13(3) (3) In any prosecution under subsection (1D)— amended by No. 60/2015 s. 10(3). (a) evidence that the accused had the custody, S. 13(3)(a) amended by care or control of an animal which appeared Nos 68/2009 to have been used as a lure or kill in the s. 97(Sch. item 95.1), manner referred to in subsection (1D) is 60/2015 prima facie evidence that the accused used s. 10(3). the animal as a lure or kill in that manner; and (b) it is a defence if the person charged proves that— (i) the animal was used as a lure or kill in S. 13(3)(b)(i) amended by the manner referred to in subsection No. 60/2015 (1D) without that person's knowledge s. 10(3). or consent; or
S. 13(1G) inserted by No. 60/2015 s. 10(1). (1G) A person, without reasonable excuse, must not attend an event or place where a person is using an animal as a lure or kill— (a) for the purpose of blooding a greyhound; or (b) in connection with the training or racing of any coursing dog. Penalty: 120 penalty units. S. 13(2) amended by Nos 77/1995 s. 10(2), 74/2000 s. 3(Sch. 1 item 101), 103/2003 s. 35, 60/2015 s. 10(2). (2) In any prosecution under subsection (1), (1A), (1B), (1C), (1D) or (1E), evidence in writing by a veterinary practitioner who is employed, or who practises on his or her own behalf, as a veterinary pathologist that an animal was alive at the time of its attack by a dog is prima facie evidence that the animal was alive at the time of that attack. S. 13(3) amended by No. 60/2015 s. 10(3). (3) In any prosecution under subsection (1D)— S. 13(3)(a) amended by Nos 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 95.1), 60/2015 s. 10(3). (a) evidence that the accused had the custody, care or control of an animal which appeared to have been used as a lure or kill in the manner referred to in subsection (1D) is prima facie evidence that the accused used the animal as a lure or kill in that manner; and (b) it is a defence if the person charged proves that— S. 13(3)(b)(i) amended by No. 60/2015 s. 10(3). (i) the animal was used as a lure or kill in the manner referred to in subsection (1D) without that person's knowledge or consent; or
86-46a088.docx