infrequently (once every quarter), how through the Dean’s Circular will this work? What if important The Dean’s Circular allows room for objection by feedback should be given in between anyone on campus meetings? Meetings are mandated by circumstance The same should hold for the UOTT Q: Who sits on the Faculty Board? Membership is extensive. Prof. Ntusi will provide a list Feedback from Faculty and Constituencies Prelude: There is great support and optimism from the different constituents on campus about the Ad Hoc Task Team as it displays a genuine effort by the Dean Team and Faculty leadership to deal with student demands timeously and effectively Comment Response/Discussion Ensure all undergraduate student All student constituencies are believed to be constituencies are represented in Selection represented at the moment Task Team Any constituencies not represented will be allowed to present themselves through the circulation of the minutes Conclusion Enquire about Decolonize FHS and whether they would like representation Selection Task Team should be expanded to Important as this allows the inclusion of include class representatives students who are not affiliated with any particular constituency 2 representatives will be chosen from among the MBChB and Health and Rehabilitation class representatives, respectively It is important that students not to be forced onto the Selection Task Team Selection and Nomination of Undergraduate This was adequately dealt with and outlined Oversight Task Team did not deal in-depth with in the document provided, so there will be selections and nominations no need to circulate a different document The same system was used in 2016 with broad acceptance Each constituency to nominate a member and submit these nominations with a motivation as to why the nominee is qualified The voting process will be one vote per person Process of reporting and providing outcomes to This was thought to be beyond the scope of working groups are not yet established the Ad Hoc Task Team and would be left for the UOTT to deal with How will nominations be dealt with and who The nominations will be dealt with and will review the nominations? reviewed by the Selection Task Team Recommendation of an external and Recommendation was accepted independent person to be brought in The Selection Task Team circulating the The Selection Task Team will be composed
infrequently (once every quarter), how will this work? What if important feedback should be given in between meetings? through the Dean’s Circular The Dean’s Circular allows room for objection by anyone on campus Meetings are mandated by circumstance The same should hold for the UOTT Q: Who sits on the Faculty Board? Membership is extensive. Prof. Ntusi will provide a list Feedback from Faculty and Constituencies Prelude: There is great support and optimism from the different constituents on campus about the Ad Hoc Task Team as it displays a genuine effort by the Dean Team and Faculty leadership to deal with student demands timeously and effectively Comment Response/Discussion Ensure all undergraduate student constituencies are represented in Selection Task Team All student constituencies are believed to be represented at the moment Any constituencies not represented will be allowed to present themselves through the circulation of the minutes Conclusion Enquire about Decolonize FHS and whether they would like representation Selection Task Team should be expanded to include class representatives Important as this allows the inclusion of students who are not affiliated with any particular constituency 2 representatives will be chosen from among the MBChB and Health and Rehabilitation class representatives, respectively It is important that students not to be forced onto the Selection Task Team Selection and Nomination of Undergraduate Oversight Task Team did not deal in-depth with selections and nominations This was adequately dealt with and outlined in the document provided, so there will be no need to circulate a different document The same system was used in 2016 with broad acceptance Each constituency to nominate a member and submit these nominations with a motivation as to why the nominee is qualified The voting process will be one vote per person Process of reporting and providing outcomes to working groups are not yet established This was thought to be beyond the scope of the Ad Hoc Task Team and would be left for the UOTT to deal with How will nominations be dealt with and who will review the nominations? Recommendation of an external and independent person to be brought in The nominations will be dealt with and reviewed by the Selection Task Team Recommendation was accepted The Selection Task Team circulating the The Selection Task Team will be composed
Ad%20Hoc%20Task%20Team%20Minutes_17.02.2017.docx