Table 1. continued Summary of studies presenting data on the outcome domain of effectiveness (cohort studies). Study and Setting Design N Outcome Sub-Domain Measure/Indicator Retrospective cohort study 45 Length of stay Mean number of weeks Reed et al. (2004)4 (52) Follow up: up to 14 years Discharge pathway Level security/type of placement at discharge Low secure Discharge outcome Positive (discharged to a level of lower security) or negative (discharged to a level of higher security) outcome Incidents Collected from hospital incident records. Incidents at baseline (week 6 to 10 of stay) were compared to end of stay (last 4 weeks of treatment). Frequency (total number of incidents per month) was adjusted for length of stay. Change in incidents calculated per person per week Xenitidis et al. (1999) (53) Retrospective cohort study 64 Length of stay Mean number of months Low secure Follow up: up to 11 years Discharge pathway Level security/type of placement at discharge Discharge outcome Good (discharged to community) or bad (not placed in a community setting) outcome Incidents Collected from hospital incident records. Incidents at baseline (week 6 to 10 of stay) were compared to end of stay (last 4 weeks of treatment). Frequency (total number of incidents per month) was adjusted for length of stay. 4The sample in Reed et al (2004) overlaps with that of Xenitidis et al. (1999). Note.
Table 1. continued Summary of studies presenting data on the outcome domain of effectiveness (cohort studies). Study and Setting Design N Outcome Sub-Domain Measure/Indicator Reed et al. (2004)4 (52) Low secure Retrospective cohort study Follow up: up to 14 years 45 Length of stay Discharge pathway Discharge outcome Incidents Mean number of weeks Level security/type of placement at discharge Positive (discharged to a level of lower security) or negative (discharged to a level of higher security) outcome Collected from hospital incident records. Incidents at baseline (week 6 to 10 of stay) were compared to end of stay (last 4 weeks of treatment). Frequency (total number of incidents per month) was adjusted for length of stay. Change in incidents calculated per person per week Xenitidis et al. (1999) (53) Low secure Retrospective cohort study Follow up: up to 11 years 64 Length of stay Discharge pathway Discharge outcome Incidents Mean number of months Level security/type of placement at discharge Good (discharged to community) or bad (not placed in a community setting) outcome Collected from hospital incident records. Incidents at baseline (week 6 to 10 of stay) were compared to end of stay (last 4 weeks of treatment). Frequency (total number of incidents per month) was adjusted for length of stay. Note. 4The sample in Reed et al (2004) overlaps with that of Xenitidis et al. (1999).
A%2520systematic%2520review%2520and%2520synthesis%2520of%2520outcome%2520domains%2520for%2520use.docx