Table .4 proposed pricing structure and the NER Powerlink’s requirements NER requirements AER assessment Requirement for separate prices for each Section 6.9 of Powerlink's proposed pricing category of prescribed transmission methodology complies with this requirement. services—clause 6A.23.4(a) Requirement for fixed annual amount prices Section 6.9.1 of Powerlink's proposed pricing for prescribed entry services and prescribed methodology complies with this requirement. exit services—clause 6A.23.4(g) Requirement for postage stamped prices for Section 6.9.4 of Powerlink's proposed pricing prescribed common transmission methodology complies with this requirement. 6A.23.4(f) Requirement for prices for locational component of prescribed TUOS services to be Section 6.9.2 of Powerlink's proposed pricing based on demand at times of greatest use of the transmission network and for which methodology complies with this requirement. network investment is most likely to be contemplated—clause 6A.23.4(b)(1) Requirement for prices for the locational component of ASRR for prescribed TUOS services not to change by more than 2 per Section 6.9.2 of Powerlink's proposed pricing cent per year compared with the load methodology complies with this requirement. weighted average prices for this component for the relevant region—clause 6A.23.4(b)(2) Requirement for prices for the adjusted component of prescribed TUOS Section 6.9.3 of Powerlink's proposed pricing services to be on a postage stamp methodology complies with this requirement. 6A.23.4(e) We do not accept that section 6.12 of Powerlink's proposed pricing methodology Setting of TUOS locational prices between complies with aspects of this requirement for annual price publications–clause 6A.23.4(b) the reasons given in section 12.4.3 of this attachment. Assessment against the pricing methodology guidelines We are satisfied that proposed pricing methodology complies with the Powerlink’s information requirements of the pricing methodology guidelines. Key features of the proposal include:
Table .4 Powerlink’s proposed pricing structure and the NER requirements NER requirements AER assessment Requirement for separate prices for each category of prescribed transmission services—clause 6A.23.4(a) Section 6.9 of Powerlink's proposed pricing methodology complies with this requirement. Requirement for fixed annual amount prices for prescribed entry services and prescribed exit services—clause 6A.23.4(g) Section 6.9.1 of Powerlink's proposed pricing methodology complies with this requirement. Requirement for postage stamped prices for prescribed common transmission 6A.23.4(f) Section 6.9.4 of Powerlink's proposed pricing methodology complies with this requirement. Requirement for prices for locational component of prescribed TUOS services to be based on demand at times of greatest use of the transmission network and for which network investment is most likely to be contemplated—clause 6A.23.4(b)(1) Section 6.9.2 of Powerlink's proposed pricing methodology complies with this requirement. Requirement for prices for the locational component of ASRR for prescribed TUOS services not to change by more than 2 per cent per year compared with the load weighted average prices for this component for the relevant region—clause 6A.23.4(b)(2) Section 6.9.2 of Powerlink's proposed pricing methodology complies with this requirement. Requirement for prices for the adjusted component of prescribed TUOS services to be on a postage stamp 6A.23.4(e) Section 6.9.3 of Powerlink's proposed pricing methodology complies with this requirement. Setting of TUOS locational prices between annual price publications–clause 6A.23.4(b) We do not accept that section 6.12 of Powerlink's proposed pricing methodology complies with aspects of this requirement for the reasons given in section 12.4.3 of this attachment. Assessment against the pricing methodology guidelines We are satisfied that Powerlink’s proposed pricing methodology complies with the information requirements of the pricing methodology guidelines. Key features of the proposal include:
AER%20-%20Draft%20decision%20-%20Powerlink%20transmission%20determination%20-%20Attachment%2012%20-%20Pricing%20methodology%20-%20September%202016.docx