9.3 Sustaining Engineering Provide data on processes and tools used or planned for use to monitor system performance (sustainment metrics), the product support package, the responsible office, the metrics or data monitored, any feedback process, and review timeframes ). These demonstrate that the program has a monitoring plan and capability that can trigger corrective action in the event one or more product support element is at risk of degrading sustainment performance. This data is also useful for the PSM in linking resources to readiness. The following table is a notional presentation of the data. Sustainment Performance Data Collection and Reporting Metrics/Data Review Tool OPR/IPT Feedback Mechanism Monitored Timeframes Quarterly Sustainment Automatic updates to PEO PSM AO, AM, R MDTO, Quad Chart and DASD(MR) via DAMIR. MDTM, O&S cost Metrics feed from Post IOC Review PSM Even Years NALDA GCSS Logistics Feedback from operators Assessment and PSI and PSPs Elements Summary reports NALCOMIS/NALDA data Ao, Am, R MDTO, forwarded to DASD(MR) Failure Sustaining Critical systems MDTM, O&S analyzed and compared to Reporting, Engineering effecting or cost driver baseline values and Analysis, and IPT AM as needed metrics including but sis tools used Corrective 25% of Work Unit to update product support not limited to: Action System Codes (WUCs) XXX elements as needed (FRACAS) assessed every XXX XXX year Deficiency PSM Deficiency During acquisition phases, All DRs Reports Chief Report (DR) the PSM and CE will assessed in less Engineer Processing Time monitor; after fielding, the than 14 days PSM and CE will collaborate with the using command -4 staff to monitor 9-7: Sustainment Performance Monitoring Include an as-of date
9.3 Sustaining Engineering Provide data on processes and tools used or planned for use to monitor system performance (sustainment metrics), the product support package, the responsible office, the metrics or data monitored, any feedback process, and review timeframes ). These demonstrate that the program has a monitoring plan and capability that can trigger corrective action in the event one or more product support element is at risk of degrading sustainment performance. This data is also useful for the PSM in linking resources to readiness. The following table is a notional presentation of the data. Sustainment Performance Data Collection and Reporting Tool OPR/IPT Metrics/Data Monitored Feedback Mechanism Review Timeframes Sustainment Quad Chart PSM AO, AM, R MDTO, MDTM, O&S cost Automatic updates to PEO and DASD(MR) via DAMIR. Metrics feed from NALDA GCSS Quarterly Post IOC Review PSM Logistics Assessment Elements Feedback from operators and PSI and PSPs Summary reports forwarded to DASD(MR) Even Years Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) Sustaining Engineering IPT Ao, Am, R MDTO, MDTM, O&S cost driver metrics including but not limited to: XXX XXX XXX NALCOMIS/NALDA data analyzed and compared to baseline values and sis tools used to update product support elements as needed Critical systems effecting or AM as needed 25% of Work Unit Codes (WUCs) assessed every year Deficiency Reports PSM Chief Engineer Deficiency Report (DR) Processing Time During acquisition phases, the PSM and CE will monitor; after fielding, the PSM and CE will collaborate with the using command -4 staff to monitor All DRs assessed in less than 14 days 9-7: Sustainment Performance Monitoring Include an as-of date
AFLCMC%20LCSP%20Sample%20Outline%20Nov%2017%20(aligned%20with%20DoD%20Jan%2017%20Version%202.0).docx