Figure 20: Navy officer command and charge board recommendations for 2014/2015 Total positions Male Female Female % Notes Includes reserve 31 ACSC 24 7 23% positions 3 Shore command 2 1 33% 11 Shore charge 8 3 28% MWV sea 22 20 2 9% command 44 Sea charge 36 8 18% Figure 21: Navy other rank gateways, representation 2012/2013 women’s Proportion of women Representation of women in competitive pool (target) (achieved) 2012/2013 Total in Women in % women in competitive competitive competitive Total places/ No of % women pool pool pool (target) appointments women achieved LSPC (AB) 2917 599 21% 844 128 15% POPC (LS) 873 178 20% 216 32 15% CPOPC (PO) 711 76 11% 119 16 13% Figure 22: Army officer gateways, representation 2012/2013 women’s 2012/2013 Proportion of women Representation of women
Figure 20: Navy officer command and charge board recommendations for 2014/2015 Total positions Male Female Female % Notes ACSC 31 24 7 23% Includes reserve positions Shore command 3 2 1 33% Shore charge 11 8 3 28% MWV sea command 22 20 2 9% Sea charge 44 36 8 18% Figure 21: Navy other rank gateways, women’s representation 2012/2013 2012/2013 Proportion of women in competitive pool (target) Representation of women (achieved) Total in competitive pool Women in competitive pool % women in competitive pool (target) Total places/ appointments No of women % women achieved LSPC (AB) 2917 599 21% 844 128 15% POPC (LS) 873 178 20% 216 32 15% CPOPC (PO) 711 76 11% 119 16 13% Figure 22: Army officer gateways, women’s representation 2012/2013 2012/2013 Proportion of women Representation of women
adf-audit-2014.docx