The project applicant should demonstrate that the activities planned within the project are defined on the basis of the analysis of the situation conducted by the project applicant and the cooperation partner (if applicable), the order of their implementation is logical, transparent, mutually coordinated and corresponding to the time schedule planned within the scope of the project. The activities planned in the project and the order of their implementation should ensure the achievement of the goals and results planned in the project application within the scope of the planned funding. The project application provides information about the project implementation quality control measures planned by the project applicant and the cooperation partner (if applicable), which allows to measure progress, quality of the planned actions and make necessary amendments to ensure the achievement of the goals and results planned in the project application within the scope of the time schedule specified and the funding planned in the project application. If the evaluation is below 3 points, the project application is rejected. 3.4. Quality of the project implementation team and the cooperation arrangements 3.4.1. The project envisages close, 0 5 Must score at The project application provides information: – reciprocally complementary and least about cooperation (if applicable) (Evaluation partner’s goal-oriented partnerships between 3 points specialisation, experience, skills, know-how and unit – higher education institutions management support, which are necessary for the 0.5 points) participating in the project; implementation of the specific planned activities 3.4.2. The project implementation staff listed in the project application, and a description of the cooperation (if applicable) planned (incl. that of the cooperation partner’s involvement and expected effect on the partner) have appropriate achievement of the aim and results defined in the knowledge, skills, experience and project application; management support to successfully
The project applicant should demonstrate that the activities planned within the project are defined on the basis of the analysis of the situation conducted by the project applicant and the cooperation partner (if applicable), the order of their implementation is logical, transparent, mutually coordinated and corresponding to the time schedule planned within the scope of the project. The activities planned in the project and the order of their implementation should ensure the achievement of the goals and results planned in the project application within the scope of the planned funding. The project application provides information about the project implementation quality control measures planned by the project applicant and the cooperation partner (if applicable), which allows to measure progress, quality of the planned actions and make necessary amendments to ensure the achievement of the goals and results planned in the project application within the scope of the time schedule specified and the funding planned in the project application. If the evaluation is below 3 points, the project application is rejected. 3.4. Quality of the project implementation team and the cooperation arrangements 3.4.1. The project envisages close, reciprocally complementary and goal-oriented partnerships between higher education institutions participating in the project; 0 – 5 (Evaluation unit – 0.5 points) Must score at least 3 points The project application provides information: about cooperation partner’s (if applicable) specialisation, experience, skills, know-how and management support, which are necessary for the implementation of the specific planned activities listed in the project application, and a description of the cooperation partner’s (if applicable) planned involvement and expected effect on the achievement of the aim and results defined in the project application; 3.4.2. The project implementation staff (incl. that of the cooperation partner) have appropriate knowledge, skills, experience and management support to successfully
821_2_k_Kriteriju%20metodika_anglu_val.docx