On what basis are you Claim on the basis of material error or irregularity as defined in point 7.1 of the appeals List of evidence to support appealing against the procedure: each claim, which should be assessment outcome(s), attached / included with this as specified at point 7 of submission: the appeals arrangements, to written evidence which you must also submit in order to substantiate your claims. Please ensure you have read and applied these definitions. You are reminded that there is no Claim on the basis of mitigating circumstances not known to the Assessment Board as defined List of evidence to support provision for appeal on in point 7.2 of the appeals procedure each claim, which should be the basis of a attached / included with this disagreement on submission: academic judgement, as set out in point 6. Please write ‘not where applicable’ appropriate for either possible ground. What is the outcome that you are seeking? The completed form should be e-mailed, along with supporting evidence to , within 14 days of results notification Approved arrangements that are considered against include those for claiming mitigating circumstances and assessment regulations, each students’ assessments of which are available from the at , listed under and University’s Key Information Pages ‘Mitigating Circumstances’ ‘Assessment Regulations’. For students based at Harper Adams University, the Student Wellbeing Officer (based in Student Services), or their nominee, is able to advise students University’s on preparing appeals. Students based at a partner college should contact the for advice. Students enrolled on a programme run in college’s HE Manager conjunction with their employer or a training and regulatory authority should request initial advice from their Harper Adams based Link Tutor. programme’s
On what basis are you appealing against the assessment outcome(s), as specified at point 7 of the appeals arrangements, to written evidence which you must also submit in order to substantiate your claims. Please ensure you have read and applied these definitions. You are reminded that there is no provision for appeal on the basis of a disagreement on academic judgement, as set out in point 6. Please write ‘not applicable’ where appropriate for either possible ground. Claim on the basis of material error or irregularity as defined in point 7.1 of the appeals procedure: List of evidence to support each claim, which should be attached / included with this submission: Claim on the basis of mitigating circumstances not known to the Assessment Board as defined in point 7.2 of the appeals procedure List of evidence to support each claim, which should be attached / included with this submission: What is the outcome that you are seeking? The completed form should be e-mailed, along with supporting evidence to , within 14 days of results notification Approved arrangements that students’ assessments are considered against include those for claiming mitigating circumstances and assessment regulations, each of which are available from the University’s Key Information Pages at , listed under ‘Mitigating Circumstances’ and ‘Assessment Regulations’. For students based at Harper Adams University, the University’s Student Wellbeing Officer (based in Student Services), or their nominee, is able to advise students on preparing appeals. Students based at a partner college should contact the college’s HE Manager for advice. Students enrolled on a programme run in conjunction with their employer or a training and regulatory authority should request initial advice from their programme’s Harper Adams based Link Tutor.
academic-appeals-stage-2-2017.docx