panel in figure I.1 is also consistent with this finding, suggesting that CLCs located in high SEIFA deciles serve smaller proportions of low-income clients than their counterparts located in low SEIFA deciles. Figure I.1 Reported income by SEIFA decile of CLC client and CLC locationa 201112 a of SEIFA decile refers to those localities linked to postcodes for post-office box purposes only. ‘na’ Income is defined in CLSIS as no income, low income or $26 000 per (‘under $500 per week year’), medium income $500 and $1000 per week or $26 000 to $52 000 per high income (‘between year’), per week or over or $52 000 per year or not applicable or not stated. (‘$1000 over’), Data sources: Commission estimates based on unpublished CLSIS data and ABS (Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2011, Cat. no. 2033.0.55.001). The issue of placement of CLCs is discussed in further detail in chapter 21.
panel in figure I.1 is also consistent with this finding, suggesting that CLCs located in high SEIFA deciles serve smaller proportions of low-income clients than their counterparts located in low SEIFA deciles. Figure I.1 Reported income by SEIFA decile of CLC client and CLC locationa 201112 a ‘na’ of SEIFA decile refers to those localities linked to postcodes for post-office box purposes only. Income is defined in CLSIS as no income, low income (‘under $500 per week or $26 000 per year’), medium income (‘between $500 and $1000 per week or $26 000 to $52 000 per year’), high income (‘$1000 per week or over or $52 000 per year or over’), not applicable or not stated. Data sources: Commission estimates based on unpublished CLSIS data and ABS (Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2011, Cat. no. 2033.0.55.001). The issue of placement of CLCs is discussed in further detail in chapter 21.
access-justice-appendixi.docx