Respondents across geographic locations, regardless of whether they collaborate with the WBG, had statistically similar ratings for the significance of the contribution that the knowledge work and activities make to development results in Senegal. WBG’s Technical Quality of the Knowledge Work and Activities WBG’s (Indicator Question) Respondents from academia/research institutes/think tanks gave the highest ratings for the technical quality of the knowledge work and activities in Senegal, whereas WBG’s respondents from private sector/financial sector/private banks had significantly lower ratings. Respondents across geographic locations had statistically similar ratings for the technical quality of the knowledge work and activities. WBG’s Respondents who professionally collaborate/work with the WBG had significantly higher ratings for the technical quality of the knowledge work and activities than those WBG’s who do not collaborate with the WBG. VIII. World Bank Knowledge and Instruments Group’s (continued) Most Effective Instruments in Reducing Poverty Respondents across stakeholder groups and geographic locations all agreed that investment lending and capacity development are the most effective WBG instruments in reducing poverty in Senegal. Respondents who collaborate with the WBG were significantly more likely to consider as the most effective instrument in reducing poverty in Senegal than “investment lending” respondent who do not collaborate with the institution. VIII. World Bank Knowledge and Instruments Group’s (continued) Meeting Needs for Financial Instruments Senegal’s (Indicator Question) Respondents from ministries/PMUs and consultants working on WBG projects had the highest levels of agreement that the World Bank financial instruments meet Group’s needs, whereas respondents from private sector/financial sector/private banks Senegal’s had significantly lower levels of agreement.
Respondents across geographic locations, regardless of whether they collaborate with the WBG, had statistically similar ratings for the significance of the contribution that the WBG’s knowledge work and activities make to development results in Senegal. Technical Quality of the WBG’s Knowledge Work and Activities (Indicator Question) Respondents from academia/research institutes/think tanks gave the highest ratings for the technical quality of the WBG’s knowledge work and activities in Senegal, whereas respondents from private sector/financial sector/private banks had significantly lower ratings. Respondents across geographic locations had statistically similar ratings for the technical quality of the WBG’s knowledge work and activities. Respondents who professionally collaborate/work with the WBG had significantly higher ratings for the technical quality of the WBG’s knowledge work and activities than those who do not collaborate with the WBG. VIII. World Bank Group’s Knowledge and Instruments (continued) Most Effective Instruments in Reducing Poverty Respondents across stakeholder groups and geographic locations all agreed that investment lending and capacity development are the most effective WBG instruments in reducing poverty in Senegal. Respondents who collaborate with the WBG were significantly more likely to consider “investment lending” as the most effective instrument in reducing poverty in Senegal than respondent who do not collaborate with the institution. VIII. World Bank Group’s Knowledge and Instruments (continued) Meeting Senegal’s Needs for Financial Instruments (Indicator Question) Respondents from ministries/PMUs and consultants working on WBG projects had the highest levels of agreement that the World Bank Group’s financial instruments meet Senegal’s needs, whereas respondents from private sector/financial sector/private banks had significantly lower levels of agreement.
96132-WP-Box391436B-PUBLIC-Senegal-CS-FY14-Report.docx