CODE ANALYSIS NO SPECIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION SIGNIFICANCE IMPACT PRIORITY AREA L M H L M H (1-3) 1 Strengths 1.1 Qualified, competent and dedicated staff 1 √ √ 1.2 Adequate and efficient utilization of resources 1 √ √ 1.3 Political will to fight corruption 1 √ √ 1.4 Management support in executing the mandates 1 √ √ 1.5 Flexible reporting system of alleged corrupt 1 √ √ practices 1.6 Physical infrastructures (Regional offices) 1 √ √ 1.7 Integrated case management system (GoCase) 1 √ √ 1.8 Statutory body entrenched by Constitution 1 √ √ 1.9 Thorough investigations 1 √ √ 1.10 ACC has laid a strong foundation for sustainable 1 √ √ programs in the fight against corruption 1.11 Operational autonomy 2 √ √ 1.12 Strong internal controls in place 2 √ √ 2 2.1 Inadequate legislation, powers and autonomy 1 √ √ processes 2.2 Lack of specialized skills (on going tailor made 1 √ √ training, Risk management, corruption prevention skills/tools). 2.3 Inadequate organizational structure (e.g. No 1 √ √ positions for prosecution, corruption prevention staff, lawyers {legal Advisor} and intelligence gathering personnel in the ACC structure) and lack of opportunity for career progression 2.4 Implementation of incentives to retain staff in 1 √ √ specialised areas 2.5 Bureaucratic processes 1 √ √ 2.6 Lack of corporate communication strategy 1 √ √ 2.7 Inadequate budget 1 √ √ 2.8 Lack of provision in the Anti-Corruption Act for 1 √ √ prevention officers to be issued with authority cards. 3 3.1 Political will and conducive environment (e.g. ACC 1 √ √ budget approval by Parliament) 3.2 Rolling out of National Anti-Corruption Strategy 1 √ √ 3.3 Establishment of Special Court for corruption cases 1 √ √ 3.4 Government Training Policy and study assistance 1 √ √ 3.5 New whistle blower Bill, vibrant media and other 1 √ √ watchdogs 3.6 Discovery of practices/systems prone to corruption 1 √ √ during investigations 3.7 Public support for ACC to stop corruption 1 √ √
CODE ANALYSIS AREA NO SPECIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION SIGNIFICANCE IMPACT PRIORITY L M H L M H (1-3) 1 Strengths 1.1 Qualified, competent and dedicated staff √ √ 1 1.2 Adequate and efficient utilization of resources √ √ 1 1.3 Political will to fight corruption √ √ 1 1.4 Management support in executing the mandates √ √ 1 1.5 Flexible reporting system of alleged corrupt practices √ √ 1 1.6 Physical infrastructures (Regional offices) √ √ 1 1.7 Integrated case management system (GoCase) √ √ 1 1.8 Statutory body entrenched by Constitution √ √ 1 1.9 Thorough investigations √ √ 1 1.10 ACC has laid a strong foundation for sustainable programs in the fight against corruption √ √ 1 1.11 Operational autonomy √ √ 2 1.12 Strong internal controls in place √ √ 2 2 2.1 Inadequate legislation, powers and autonomy processes √ √ 1 2.2 Lack of specialized skills (on going tailor made training, Risk management, corruption prevention skills/tools). √ √ 1 2.3 Inadequate organizational structure (e.g. No positions for prosecution, corruption prevention staff, lawyers {legal Advisor} and intelligence gathering personnel in the ACC structure) and lack of opportunity for career progression √ √ 1 2.4 Implementation of incentives to retain staff in specialised areas √ √ 1 2.5 Bureaucratic processes √ √ 1 2.6 Lack of corporate communication strategy √ √ 1 2.7 Inadequate budget √ √ 1 2.8 Lack of provision in the Anti-Corruption Act for prevention officers to be issued with authority cards. √ √ 1 3 3.1 Political will and conducive environment (e.g. ACC budget approval by Parliament) √ √ 1 3.2 Rolling out of National Anti-Corruption Strategy √ √ 1 3.3 Establishment of Special Court for corruption cases √ √ 1 3.4 Government Training Policy and study assistance √ √ 1 3.5 New whistle blower Bill, vibrant media and other watchdogs √ √ 1 3.6 Discovery of practices/systems prone to corruption during investigations √ √ 1 3.7 Public support for ACC to stop corruption √ √ 1
ACC-Strategic-Plan-16-August-2017.docx