Property rights are enshrined in section 114 and 51xxxi of the Commonwealth Constitution and backed up by section 42(i) of the Supreme Court Act 1986 but of course this can only be gaurenteed by an efficent and well defined Judicature, jury based court system. Ch 8. Property Rights—Real Property Property rights are enshrined in the broad spectrum within a Grant IN Fee Simple, Of late the States have chaosen to remove the word "IN" from the true title deed which in turn has created a conversion in the true meaning of the inherited law Ch 9. Retrospective Laws As long as the laws do not conflict then we have a system of law that is able to be comprehended at a street level. Curremtly the amount of abuse by the Stes and the Commonwealth to the law of the land would make the nurrenberg trials seem mild. Ch 10. Fair Trial There is a guarentee through the inherited law to maintain an independent judicature unlike the current system which seems to avoid at all cost any request to bring about a fair trial in both Criminal and civil jurisdictions. Jury trials are a fundemantal guarentee to an independent judicature but requires a clear disconnection from anything to do with the failed Department of Public Prosecutions which is a perversion of the inherited Grand Jury Lawyers in Australia also ignore the International covenant on civil and political rights which is typical of a system that is bound to a foreign power through the Holy See. Ch 11. Burden of Proof There can be only one form of defense and that is bound in the inherited ability as a defendant to rely on the prosecution to bring about the right to be treated as innocent until proven guilty in all jurisdictions. Ch 12. Privilege Against Self-incrimination The distinction between providing evidence of innocnence and the common lawn requirement of being proven guilty is a distinction between Roman law and Common law. Ch 13. Client Legal Privilege As long as the information being with held is not of a public nature with respect to the safety of the general public. Ch 14. Strict and Absolute Liability A claim of right exists clearly within the Common law but through the adherence to Roman law through the Holy See the tables are clearly turned against the inherited ;law and as such any claimof strict liability is to be seen as an inconsistency in law and as such no law at all.
Property rights are enshrined in section 114 and 51xxxi of the Commonwealth Constitution and backed up by section 42(i) of the Supreme Court Act 1986 but of course this can only be gaurenteed by an efficent and well defined Judicature, jury based court system. Ch 8. Property Rights—Real Property Property rights are enshrined in the broad spectrum within a Grant IN Fee Simple, Of late the States have chaosen to remove the word "IN" from the true title deed which in turn has created a conversion in the true meaning of the inherited law Ch 9. Retrospective Laws As long as the laws do not conflict then we have a system of law that is able to be comprehended at a street level. Curremtly the amount of abuse by the Stes and the Commonwealth to the law of the land would make the nurrenberg trials seem mild. Ch 10. Fair Trial There is a guarentee through the inherited law to maintain an independent judicature unlike the current system which seems to avoid at all cost any request to bring about a fair trial in both Criminal and civil jurisdictions. Jury trials are a fundemantal guarentee to an independent judicature but requires a clear disconnection from anything to do with the failed Department of Public Prosecutions which is a perversion of the inherited Grand Jury Lawyers in Australia also ignore the International covenant on civil and political rights which is typical of a system that is bound to a foreign power through the Holy See. Ch 11. Burden of Proof There can be only one form of defense and that is bound in the inherited ability as a defendant to rely on the prosecution to bring about the right to be treated as innocent until proven guilty in all jurisdictions. Ch 12. Privilege Against Self-incrimination The distinction between providing evidence of innocnence and the common lawn requirement of being proven guilty is a distinction between Roman law and Common law. Ch 13. Client Legal Privilege As long as the information being with held is not of a public nature with respect to the safety of the general public. Ch 14. Strict and Absolute Liability A claim of right exists clearly within the Common law but through the adherence to Roman law through the Holy See the tables are clearly turned against the inherited ;law and as such any claimof strict liability is to be seen as an inconsistency in law and as such no law at all.
88._org_know_your_rights_group.docx