Work group analyzed grant 3/26/14 SIG Work data and key findings. 0 2 1 0 2 0 Session Provided feedback relating to student leading indicators. Work group expanded upon 3/26/14 SIG Work work completed by morning 1 3 1 0 1 3 Session session. Finalized budget needs. Work group made final 3/27/14 SIG Work adjustments to budget 0 4 3 0 2 0 Session proposal and prepared to present proposal to CEO. Electronic communication Parent Public Public Public Public Public Public through blog explaining SIG 3/27/14 Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum and requesting parent feedback. CEO discussed status of SIG School Board 3/27/14 4 2 1 5 2 0 with school board. Opened Meeting up for questions/feedback. Part 3: Schools to be Served by LEA Schools to be Served by LEA Based on the “School Needs Assessment” tool, the LEA has determined this model for the school No model will be implemented – Priority Grade Selected Explain why the LEA believes they do School Name School Span Model not have the capacity to serve this Y/N Priority School Anderson Preparatory K-12 Y Transformation Academy Part 4: Needs Assessment and Goals Complete the table below for your overall student population, as well as available student groups (American Native, Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, Free/Reduced Lunch, Limited English Proficient and Special Education) that did not pass in English/language Arts and/or mathematics How severe is this group’s failure in % of this # of students comparison to the Student Groups - SY SY SY group not in this group school’s rate? In what ELA 2015 Goal Goal Goal passing not passing ways are the learning needs of this group unique? HIGH - No prior formal 40% 45% 50% Example: LEP 75% 52 schooling; from passing passing passing culture. 75.6% 78.5% 81.4% Overall – ISTEP+ 30.2% 112 Baseline/School Rate passing passing passing HIGH – low parental involvement, low 66.7% 71.4% 76.1% Black 42.7% 35 reading fundamental passing passing passing skills, first generation
SIG Work Session 3/26/14 0 2 1 0 2 0 Work group analyzed grant data and key findings. Provided feedback relating to student leading indicators. SIG Work Session 3/26/14 1 3 1 0 1 3 Work group expanded upon work completed by morning session. Finalized budget needs. SIG Work Session 3/27/14 0 4 3 0 2 0 Work group made final adjustments to budget proposal and prepared to present proposal to CEO. Parent 3/27/14 Public Forum Public Forum Public Forum Public Forum Public Forum Public Forum Electronic communication through blog explaining SIG and requesting parent feedback. School Board Meeting 3/27/14 4 2 1 5 2 0 CEO discussed status of SIG with school board. Opened up for questions/feedback. Part 3: Schools to be Served by LEA Schools to be Served by LEA Based on the “School Needs Assessment” tool, the LEA has determined this model for the school School Name Grade Span Priority School Y/N Selected Model No model will be implemented – Explain why the LEA believes they do not have the capacity to serve this Priority School Anderson Preparatory Academy K-12 Y Transformation Part 4: Needs Assessment and Goals Complete the table below for your overall student population, as well as available student groups (American Native, Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, Free/Reduced Lunch, Limited English Proficient and Special Education) that did not pass in English/language Arts and/or mathematics Student Groups - ELA % of this group not passing # of students in this group not passing How severe is this group’s failure in comparison to the school’s rate? In what ways are the learning needs of this group unique? SY Goal SY Goal SY Goal Example: LEP 75% 52 HIGH - No prior formal schooling; from culture. 40% passing 45% passing 50% passing Overall – ISTEP+ 30.2% 112 Baseline/School Rate 75.6% passing 78.5% passing 81.4% passing Black 42.7% 35 HIGH – low parental involvement, low reading fundamental skills, first generation 66.7% passing 71.4% passing 76.1% passing 2015
9790_sig_grant_application.docx