Breach of Standard Claim Assessment Template Name of claimant: ____________________HR Process:_________________________ Date received_____________________ Standard (please circle): Employment, Performance Management, Grievance Resolution, Redeployment, Termination not the Relevant Information Claimant Appropriate Action met did partially Principle of the considered in Agency Assessment Standard Standard Concerns Taken Standard assessment the Standard the Process Process met Process meet Mr Smith claims Equity Principle Interview with The chair declared his knowledge of the No further action X that the panel chair panel chair and applicant from his previous workplace (2 years ago). undertaken was biased toward members. This was recorded in the selection report and the successful discussed with the other members of the panel. . Review of applicant because The two other panel members did not know the selection they have worked successful applicant, and the panel assessment documentation. together before. report shows that the panel chair rated the applicant less favourably at short listing and after interview. In this case it was evident that the perceived conflict was declared and could therefore be managed by the panel. There is no information to indicate that any bias occurred in this process. Claim not substantiated Link to the Comments Assessment highlights that process undertaken was within the minimum requirements of the Employment Standard.
Breach of Standard Claim Assessment Template Name of claimant: ____________________HR Process:_________________________ Date received_____________________ Standard (please circle): Employment, Performance Management, Grievance Resolution, Redeployment, Termination Claimant Concerns Relevant Principle of the Standard Information considered in assessment Agency Assessment Process met the Standard Process partially met the Standard Process did not meet the Standard Appropriate Action Taken Mr Smith claims that the panel chair was biased toward the successful applicant because they have worked together before. Equity Principle Interview with panel chair and members. Review of selection documentation. The chair declared his knowledge of the applicant from his previous workplace (2 years ago). This was recorded in the selection report and discussed with the other members of the panel. . The two other panel members did not know the successful applicant, and the panel assessment report shows that the panel chair rated the applicant less favourably at short listing and after interview. In this case it was evident that the perceived conflict was declared and could therefore be managed by the panel. There is no information to indicate that any bias occurred in this process. Claim not substantiated X No further action undertaken Link to the Comments Assessment highlights that process undertaken was within the minimum requirements of the Employment Standard.
agency_referral_of_breach_of_standard_claim_to_psc_1.docx