Greg Any comments on this provision? Any concerns on this provision? Kaylan Greg, this is Kaylan. going to keep my comments brief today. I think that I’m should be circulation path instead of circulation route. Greg Okay, a rationale for that. Kaylan A circulation path is defined and circulation route isn’t. Greg Okay, great. Kaylan And, to avoid confusion where some code users confuse accessible route and circulation path. Greg So, you would replace route with path, correct? Kaylan Correct. Greg Any concerns about that from other members? Gary I can agree with what Gary Layman. she’s commenting, Greg Okay. Gary It sounds good. Greg Does everybody—go ahead, sorry. I’m Gary I agree with Kaylan. I support that. Greg Okay, so the ACC then is supporting this provision from Kaylan. No concerns. Okay. Thank you. I think ready to move on. Any other comments on this. we’re Okay. Thank you. Susan The next item is 11B-608.5, and this is Susan Moe. That is on page 61 of 70 of your document. What looking at there is amending 608.5 and removing the we’re sentence that says controls and faucets shall be of the single-lever design. Think about what we found is there are other types of controls that you could use like a push button that would meet the requirements for operable parts, so this will make this section consistent with the standards, with the model code, and just we’re realizing that we want to limit those controls to only a single-lever design. don’t Greg Comments. Arfaraz That can be a problem, especially in situations where [Indiscernible] equipment is required. You typically see a push button there, and okay. I think okay that’s it’s to have a push the ability to stay on or turn off that is not addressing a button. It’s push button control. An able-bodied person can get away from scalding hot water,
Greg Any comments on this provision? Any concerns on this provision? Kaylan Greg, this is Kaylan. I’m going to keep my comments brief today. I think that should be circulation path instead of circulation route. Greg Okay, a rationale for that. Kaylan A circulation path is defined and circulation route isn’t. Greg Okay, great. Kaylan And, to avoid confusion where some code users confuse accessible route and circulation path. Greg So, you would replace route with path, correct? Kaylan Correct. Greg Any concerns about that from other members? Gary I can agree with what she’s commenting, Gary Layman. Greg Okay. Gary It sounds good. Greg Does everybody—go ahead, I’m sorry. Gary I agree with Kaylan. I support that. Greg Okay, so the ACC then is supporting this provision from Kaylan. No concerns. Okay. Thank you. I think we’re ready to move on. Any other comments on this. Okay. Thank you. Susan The next item is 11B-608.5, and this is Susan Moe. That is on page 61 of 70 of your document. What we’re looking at there is amending 608.5 and removing the sentence that says controls and faucets shall be of the single-lever design. Think about what we found is there are other types of controls that you could use like a push button that would meet the requirements for operable parts, so this will make this section consistent with the standards, with the model code, and we’re just realizing that we don’t want to limit those controls to only a single-lever design. Greg Comments. Arfaraz That can be a problem, especially in situations where [Indiscernible] equipment is required. You typically see a push button there, and that’s okay. I think it’s okay to have a push button. It’s the ability to stay on or turn off that is not addressing a push button control. An able-bodied person can get away from scalding hot water,
ACC_04-26-18_Transcript.docx