EJES Manuscript Evaluation Form 2018 This form is designed to summarize the manuscript review that you have completed and to ensure that you have considered all appropriate criteria in your review report. Your review should provide a clear statement, to the authors and editors, of the modifications necessary before the paper can be published or the specific reasons for rejection. Please respond within the appointed time so that we can give the authors timely responses and feedback. NOTE: EJES promotes review procedure based on scientific validity and technical quality of the paper. Do not estimate the novelty or the potential impact of the paper. You are also not required to do proofreading of the paper. It could be recommend as part of the revision. EJES editorial office would like to express its special gratitude for your time and efforts. Our editorial team is a substantial reason that stands EJES out from the crowd! Date Manuscript Received: Date Manuscript Review Submitted: Manuscript Title: EJES Manuscript Number: Evaluation Criteria: Please give each evaluation item a numeric rating on a 5-point scale, along with an explanation for each point rating. Rating Result Questions [Poor] 1-5 [Excellent] 1. The title is clear and it is adequate to the content of the article. (a explanation is recommendable) 2. The abstract clearly presents objects, methods and results. (An explanation is recommendable) 3. There are grammatical errors and spelling mistakes in this article. (a brief explanation is recommendable) 4. The study methods are explained clearly. (An explanation is recommendable) 5. The body of the paper is clear and does not contain errors. (An explanation is recommendable) 6. The conclusions or summary are accurate and supported by the content. (An explanation is recommendable)
EJES Manuscript Evaluation Form 2018 This form is designed to summarize the manuscript review that you have completed and to ensure that you have considered all appropriate criteria in your review report. Your review should provide a clear statement, to the authors and editors, of the modifications necessary before the paper can be published or the specific reasons for rejection. Please respond within the appointed time so that we can give the authors timely responses and feedback. NOTE: EJES promotes review procedure based on scientific validity and technical quality of the paper. Do not estimate the novelty or the potential impact of the paper. You are also not required to do proofreading of the paper. It could be recommend as part of the revision. EJES editorial office would like to express its special gratitude for your time and efforts. Our editorial team is a substantial reason that stands EJES out from the crowd! Date Manuscript Received: Date Manuscript Review Submitted: Manuscript Title: EJES Manuscript Number: Evaluation Criteria: Please give each evaluation item a numeric rating on a 5-point scale, along with an explanation for each point rating. Questions Rating Result [Poor] 1-5 [Excellent] 1. The title is clear and it is adequate to the content of the article. (a explanation is recommendable) 2. The abstract clearly presents objects, methods and results. (An explanation is recommendable) 3. There are grammatical errors and spelling mistakes in this article. (a brief explanation is recommendable) 4. The study methods are explained clearly. (An explanation is recommendable) 5. The body of the paper is clear and does not contain errors. (An explanation is recommendable) 6. The conclusions or summary are accurate and supported by the content. (An explanation is recommendable)
EJES-Evaluation-Form-2018.docx