Table 1. 2015 Priority List Requirement IDs by Topic Topic Name 2015 Priority List Requirement ID* Birth Information 2001, 2009 Child Abuse Reporting 2006 Child Welfare 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034 Children with Special Healthcare Needs 2014, 2022 EPSDT 2020 Genetic information 2009 Growth Data 2002, 2003, 2019, 2042 Immunizations 2011, 2027, 2028 Medication Management 2005, 2010, 2012, 2035, 2036, 2037 Newborn Screening 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 Parents and Guardians and Patient Relationship 2006, 2008, 2021, 2038 Data Patient Identifier 2021 Patient Portal/PHR 2007, 2026, 2032 Prenatal Screening 2009 Primary Care Management 2006, 2013, 2029, 2044, 2045 Registry Linkages 2011, 2028 School-Based Linkages 2026 Security and Confidentiality 2008, 2026, 2030, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041 Specialized Scales/Scoring 2043 Well Child/Preventive Care 2004, 2013, 2019, 2020, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2027, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047 *Requirement IDs refer to individual requirements on the 2015 Priority List. Recommended Uses The MSWG prepared this document to accompany the 2015 Priority List to suggest how the software requirements might best be used by key stakeholders to improve the care of children. The most immediate, “direct” use of a 2015 Priority List software requirement is to change the way software is designed and used. Direct use in product planning and design activities usually involves users, domain experts, product planners, and software engineers. However, the MSWG recognized that additional stakeholders and downstream uses, after software changes were made, would be essential. Much work would be needed to leverage improved EHR data and tools to support public health, quality measurement, individual care, and communication among all who participate in the health and care of the child. The MSWG identified a number of “indirect” uses of the 2015 Priority List (beyond software development) by stakeholders focused on these downstream effects. Stakeholders may find it valuable to review and understand the 2015 Priority List as part of their planning activities, funding decisions, policy development, or community advocacy work. Each recommended use in this report is labelled as direct or indirect to reflect this distinction. The list of recommended uses is shown below, organized by direct or indirect use, and by stakeholder.
Table 1. 2015 Priority List Requirement IDs by Topic Topic Name 2015 Priority List Requirement ID* Birth Information 2001, 2009 Child Abuse Reporting 2006 Child Welfare 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034 Children with Special Healthcare Needs 2014, 2022 EPSDT 2020 Genetic information 2009 Growth Data 2002, 2003, 2019, 2042 Immunizations 2011, 2027, 2028 Medication Management 2005, 2010, 2012, 2035, 2036, 2037 Newborn Screening 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 Parents and Guardians and Patient Relationship Data 2006, 2008, 2021, 2038 Patient Identifier 2021 Patient Portal/PHR 2007, 2026, 2032 Prenatal Screening 2009 Primary Care Management 2006, 2013, 2029, 2044, 2045 Registry Linkages 2011, 2028 School-Based Linkages 2026 Security and Confidentiality 2008, 2026, 2030, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041 Specialized Scales/Scoring 2043 Well Child/Preventive Care 2004, 2013, 2019, 2020, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2027, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047 *Requirement IDs refer to individual requirements on the 2015 Priority List. Recommended Uses The MSWG prepared this document to accompany the 2015 Priority List to suggest how the software requirements might best be used by key stakeholders to improve the care of children. The most immediate, “direct” use of a 2015 Priority List software requirement is to change the way software is designed and used. Direct use in product planning and design activities usually involves users, domain experts, product planners, and software engineers. However, the MSWG recognized that additional stakeholders and downstream uses, after software changes were made, would be essential. Much work would be needed to leverage improved EHR data and tools to support public health, quality measurement, individual care, and communication among all who participate in the health and care of the child. The MSWG identified a number of “indirect” uses of the 2015 Priority List (beyond software development) by stakeholders focused on these downstream effects. Stakeholders may find it valuable to review and understand the 2015 Priority List as part of their planning activities, funding decisions, policy development, or community advocacy work. Each recommended use in this report is labelled as direct or indirect to reflect this distinction. The list of recommended uses is shown below, organized by direct or indirect use, and by stakeholder.
5_5_Final_Rec_Rpt_ChildrenEHR_Abridged.docx