OFFSITE Offsite Submission from SO State-collected Outputs Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 2b Candidate Survey* Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 3 Completer Survey* As applicable (based on prompt response) 1 2 3 4 - ? + Insufficient Limited Sufficient Compelling Contrasts Inconclusive Supports Evidence: Evidence: CI Criterion 3: Rationale: Rationale: Sponsoring Organization acts on feedback ONSITE solicited from Faculty – Arts & Sciences Focus Group internal and Faculty – Full and Part-time Program Faculty Focus Group(s) external Program Supervisors Focus Group stakeholders Supervising Practitioner Focus Group (including Candidate/Completer Focus Group(s) candidates, 1 2 3 4 graduates, Insufficient Limited Sufficient Compelling district and Evidence: school personnel and Rationale: employers) in continuous improvement efforts. Criterion Overall Rating Criteria Overall Rating Statement: Commendation Criteria Met Finding Professional Suggestion:
OFFSITE Offsite Submission from SO State-collected Outputs CI Criterion 3: Sponsoring Organization acts on feedback solicited from internal and external stakeholders (including candidates, graduates, district and school personnel and employers) in continuous improvement efforts. Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 2b Cont. Imp. Worksheet Prompt 3 Candidate Survey* Completer Survey* As applicable (based on prompt response) 1 Insufficient 2 Limited 3 Sufficient 4 Compelling - Contrasts ? Inconclusive + Supports Evidence: Rationale: Evidence: Rationale: ONSITE Faculty – Arts & Sciences Focus Group Faculty – Full and Part-time Program Faculty Focus Group(s) Program Supervisors Focus Group Supervising Practitioner Focus Group Candidate/Completer Focus Group(s) 1 Insufficient 2 Limited 3 Sufficient 4 Compelling Evidence: Rationale: Criterion Overall Rating Criteria Overall Rating Statement: Commendation Criteria Met Finding Professional Suggestion:
2019continuousimprov.docx