Task 6 Statement of whether learner felt Learner must state whether they were satisfied or not with their performance. Question 4 satisfied with their overall performance in the roleplay. full explanation of the reasons why the learner felt satisfied with their performance in the role play Two reasons why they were or were must be given. not satisfied, with explanation given. Task 5 example of they were Learner’s proactive. example of how they Learner’s showed two other attributes of identifying skill. Task 1 Checklist of items the learner needs Question 2 to prepare to support the meeting. (ER 1.7, goal-setting) Task 2 Identification of The answer must include a full description of team’s Question 3a objectives. what they would change next time they Description of engaged in teamwork learner’s contribution to team. the reasons the team worked well together or Statement of what the learner not. would do differently the next time The explanation must be consistent with the team’s they engage in teamwork, with objectives and the contribution to the learner’s explanation. team. Statement on whether the team Sufficiency for ER 1.7: Answers must include a worked well together to meet its relevant example of how the learner showed objective. proactivity AND a relevant example of each of Explanation of reasons the team at least four of the other listed attributes. did or work well together. didn’t Final grades will be decided using professional judgement based on a holistic examination of the evidence provided against the criteria in the unit standard.
Task 6 Question 4 Statement of whether learner felt satisfied with their overall performance in the roleplay. Two reasons why they were or were not satisfied, with explanation given. Learner must state whether they were satisfied or not with their performance. full explanation of the reasons why the learner felt satisfied with their performance in the role play must be given. Task 5 Learner’s example of they were proactive. Learner’s example of how they showed two other attributes of identifying skill. Task 1 Question 2 Checklist of items the learner needs to prepare to support the meeting. (ER 1.7, goal-setting) Task 2 Question 3a Identification of team’s objectives. Description of learner’s contribution to team. Statement of what the learner would do differently the next time they engage in teamwork, with explanation. Statement on whether the team worked well together to meet its objective. Explanation of reasons the team did or didn’t work well together. The answer must include a full description of what they would change next time they engaged in teamwork the reasons the team worked well together or not. The explanation must be consistent with the team’s objectives and the learner’s contribution to the team. Sufficiency for ER 1.7: Answers must include a relevant example of how the learner showed proactivity AND a relevant example of each of at least four of the other listed attributes. Final grades will be decided using professional judgement based on a holistic examination of the evidence provided against the criteria in the unit standard.
29024-Assessor-guidelines.docx