2: Protected area design is not significantly constraining achievement of objectives, but could be improved (e.g. with respect to larger scale ecological processes) 3: Protected area design helps achievement of objectives; it is appropriate for species and habitat conservation; and maintains ecological processes such as surface and groundwater flows at a catchment scale, natural disturbance patterns etc Comments and Next Steps 0: The boundary of the protected area is not known by the management authority or local residents/neighbouring land users 1: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority but is not known by local residents/neighbouring land users 6. Protected area boundary demarcation: 2 2: The boundary of the protected area is known by both Is the boundary known and demarcated? the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users but is not appropriately demarcated 3: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users and is appropriately demarcated Comments and Next Steps 0: There is no management plan for the protected area 1: A management plan is being prepared or has been prepared but is not being implemented 7. Management plan: Is there a management plan 3 2: A management plan exists but it is only being partially and is it being implemented? implemented because of funding constraints or other problems 3: A management plan exists and is being implemented Comments and Next Steps 7.a Planning process: The planning process allows 0: No adequate opportunity for key stakeholders to 1 1: Yes influence the management plan Comments and Next Steps 7.b Planning process: There is an established 0: No schedule and process for periodic review and 1 1: Yes updating of the management plan Comments and Next Steps 7.c Planning process: The results of monitoring, 0: No research and evaluation are routinely incorporated 1 1: Yes into planning
2: Protected area design is not significantly constraining achievement of objectives, but could be improved (e.g. with respect to larger scale ecological processes) 3: Protected area design helps achievement of objectives; it is appropriate for species and habitat conservation; and maintains ecological processes such as surface and groundwater flows at a catchment scale, natural disturbance patterns etc Comments and Next Steps 6. Protected area boundary demarcation: Is the boundary known and demarcated? 2 0: The boundary of the protected area is not known by the management authority or local residents/neighbouring land users 1: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority but is not known by local residents/neighbouring land users 2: The boundary of the protected area is known by both the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users but is not appropriately demarcated 3: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users and is appropriately demarcated Comments and Next Steps 7. Management plan: Is there a management plan and is it being implemented? 3 0: There is no management plan for the protected area 1: A management plan is being prepared or has been prepared but is not being implemented 2: A management plan exists but it is only being partially implemented because of funding constraints or other problems 3: A management plan exists and is being implemented Comments and Next Steps 7.a Planning process: The planning process allows adequate opportunity for key stakeholders to influence the management plan 1 0: No 1: Yes Comments and Next Steps 7.b Planning process: There is an established schedule and process for periodic review and updating of the management plan 1 0: No 1: Yes Comments and Next Steps 7.c Planning process: The results of monitoring, research and evaluation are routinely incorporated into planning 1 0: No 1: Yes
03-04-15_GEF_5368_UNDP_5177_Guinea-Bissau_PA_System_PRODOC_03Mar15_0.docx