Weiss, D.J, David G.W, Lofquist L.H., (1967). “Manual for the Mannesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Work Adjustment”, Industrial Relations Center: University of Minnesota. Wagner S, Rush M.C., 2000. “Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior. Context, disposition and age”, Journal of Social Psychology 41 pp. 108-391 Ward, E.A. and Davis E., 1995. “The effect of benefit satisfaction on organizational commitment”, Compensation and Benefits Management 11 pp. 35-40 Table 1: Summary of Profile of Respondents Mean SD n % Age 45.02 6.57 - - Experience in the organization 10.08 6.91 - - Present job experience 7.08 3.29 - - Male - - 372 65 Female - - 212 37 Married - - 394 67.1 Single - - 190 33.2 Table 2: Correlation Matrix of all variables Mean S.D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3.44 0.76 .80 4.35 0.48 .17* .80 2.87 0.79 .33* .63* .84 3.27 0.79 .26* .65* .33* .86 2.63 0.89 .23* .64* .44* .31* .89
Weiss, D.J, David G.W, Lofquist L.H., (1967). “Manual for the Mannesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Work Adjustment”, Industrial Relations Center: University of Minnesota. Wagner S, Rush M.C., 2000. “Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior. Context, disposition and age”, Journal of Social Psychology 41 pp. 108-391 Ward, E.A. and Davis E., 1995. “The effect of benefit satisfaction on organizational commitment”, Compensation and Benefits Management 11 pp. 35-40 Table 1: Summary of Profile of Respondents % n SD Mean - - 6.57 45.02 Age - - 6.91 10.08 Experience in the organization - - 3.29 7.08 Present job experience 65 372 - - Male 37 212 - - Female 67.1 394 - - Married 33.2 190 - - Single Table 2: Correlation Matrix of all variables 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 S.D Mean .80 0.76 3.44 .80 .17* 0.48 4.35 .84 .63* .33* 0.79 2.87 .86 .33* .65* .26* 0.79 3.27 .89 .31* .44* .64* .23* 0.89 2.63
353320335996934412_the_effects_of_job_satisfaction_on_organizational_commitment_and_job_performance_relationship.docx