timely and accurately and is used by evaluation ensuring neutrality the implementation team to learn and and objectiveness. possibly to change the course of action Indicator 15 None or ineffective evaluations are The majority of international cooperation funded During the lifetime of the – Adequacy of the being conducted without an adequate projects have evaluation plans. These project, activities will be 0 project/programme evaluation plan; including the evaluations are mainly performed internally, by conducted to promote the monitoring and necessary resources the executing agency and by the funding exchange of information and evaluation process An adequate evaluation plan is in agencies. But the results are not shared, thus capture lessons learned that lessons-learned cannot be extracted to be used could be replicated within and place but evaluation activities are 1 irregularly conducted for other projects to achieve improvement. outside Kiribati. Evaluations are being conducted as per For evaluating the adequacy of 2: A compliance an adequate evaluation plan but the project/program monitoring, monitoring system evaluation results are only partially 2 progress reports will be developed and used by the project/programme 1 prepared periodically. Also tracking key implementation team independent mid-term environmental Effective evaluations are conducted (optional) and final evaluation indicators timely and accurately and are used by reports will be prepared. Based the implementation team and the on the new information Agencies and GEF Staff to correct the available, the project will course of action if needed and to learn 3 support the preparation Rio for further planning activities Convention national reports and communications to Conventions and also states of environment reports. Total Score: 16/45
evaluation ensuring neutrality and objectiveness. timely and accurately and is used by the implementation team to learn and possibly to change the course of action Indicator 15 – Adequacy of the project/programme monitoring and evaluation process None or ineffective evaluations are being conducted without an adequate evaluation plan; including the necessary resources 0 1 The majority of international cooperation funded projects have evaluation plans. These evaluations are mainly performed internally, by the executing agency and by the funding agencies. But the results are not shared, thus lessons-learned cannot be extracted to be used for other projects to achieve improvement. During the lifetime of the project, activities will be conducted to promote the exchange of information and capture lessons learned that could be replicated within and outside Kiribati. For evaluating the adequacy of project/program monitoring, progress reports will be prepared periodically. Also independent mid-term (optional) and final evaluation reports will be prepared. Based on the new information available, the project will support the preparation Rio Convention national reports and communications to Conventions and also states of environment reports. 2: A compliance monitoring system developed and tracking key environmental indicators An adequate evaluation plan is in place but evaluation activities are irregularly conducted 1 Evaluations are being conducted as per an adequate evaluation plan but the evaluation results are only partially used by the project/programme implementation team 2 Effective evaluations are conducted timely and accurately and are used by the implementation team and the Agencies and GEF Staff to correct the course of action if needed and to learn for further planning activities 3 Total Score: 16/45
7-24-14_Kiribati_CD_UNDP_Project_Doc_0.docx