Factors Promoting Organizational Integrity Limiting Organizational Integrity Factors Frequent budget monitoring There are hidden resource ensures accountability (opportunity) costs associated with SAAC Co-Chairs participation in the the support of SAAC’s work beyond BDST process each year the role of the SAAC Co-Chairs Challenges: Possibly Expand the understanding of the Lack of understanding of the work Influenced role, benefit, and scope of the being done and its role in work performed by SAAC accreditation as well as student as well as those who success support SAAC in general Limited release time hours for Support within the Faculty Senate faculty, along with perceptions of and Administration for SAAC disparate levels of release time across functions. Mixed levels of support within the Faculty Senate for SAAC Proposed reduction of Co-Chair release time would limit output/production of SAAC to Adapt: Limited BDST participation Control and Leadership Council participation Influence Documentation of the time use of SAAC Co-Chairs in documents such as this program review -Annual Hour Accountability Identify potential strategies that SAAC may implement to -Annual Reports (DSAAC and Budget Reports) improve organizational integrity -Program Review every 3 years Plans for the Future: What is the expected -Expected workflow volume is to increase, as more departments adopt workflow volume for SAAC the Assessment Cycle-Continuous Improvement model (through needed
Factors Promoting Organizational Integrity Limiting Organizational Integrity Factors Frequent budget monitoring ensures accountability SAAC Co-Chairs participation in the BDST process each year There are hidden resource (opportunity) costs associated with the support of SAAC’s work beyond the role of the SAAC Co-Chairs Possibly Influenced Expand the understanding of the role, benefit, and scope of the work performed by SAAC as well as those who support SAAC in general Support within the Faculty Senate and Administration for SAAC Challenges: Lack of understanding of the work being done and its role in accreditation as well as student success Limited release time hours for faculty, along with perceptions of disparate levels of release time across functions. Mixed levels of support within the Faculty Senate for SAAC Proposed reduction of Co-Chair release time would limit output/production of SAAC Limited Control and Influence to Adapt: BDST participation Leadership Council participation Documentation of the time use of SAAC Co-Chairs in documents such as this program review Identify potential strategies that SAAC may implement to improve organizational integrity -Annual Hour Accountability -Annual Reports (DSAAC and Budget Reports) -Program Review every 3 years Plans for the Future: What is the expected workflow volume for SAAC -Expected workflow volume is to increase, as more departments adopt the Assessment Cycle-Continuous Improvement model (through needed
3444-2015-16-saac-program-review.docx