ATCO Mitigation mean SR-61M01 In case of loss or Assessment based on expert To define the procedure to SO-101 identified from the degradation of judgement and project reviews be applied, the potential hazard assessment. communication with as well as during discussions several actors involved in in one or several adjacent related to Trial 4. such situation (ATCO, ATSU units in a MRVT Supervisor, etc.), and to Not tested during simulations. position relevant fall-back test its efficiency. procedures shall be applied. Note: supervisor in the RTC may support the controller to apply these procedures Mitigation mean SR-62M01 In case of failure or Assessment based on expert To define the procedure to SO-113 identified from the degradation of judgement and project reviews be applied, the potential SO-115 hazard assessment. communication with as well as during discussions several actors involved in in SO-117 vehicles/personnel operating related to Trial 4. such situation (ATCO, SO-120 on the manoeuvring area for Supervisor, etc.), and to SO-121 Not tested during simulations. one or several airports test its efficiency. SO-123 allocated to a MRVT position SO-127 relevant fall-back procedures SO-132 shall be applied (e.g. use of SO-134 flash gun lights). Note: supervisor in the RTC may support the controller to apply these procedures Mitigation mean SR-64M01 In case of loss of information Assessment based on expert To define the procedure to SO-102 identified from the or detected inappropriate judgement and project reviews be applied, the potential SO-103 hazard assessment. information on a critical view as well as during discussions several actors involved in in SO-104 of the visualisation(due to a related to Trial 4. such situation (ATCO, SO-105 technical failure) a specific Supervisor, etc.), and to SO-106
ATCO SR-61M01 In case of loss or degradation of communication with one or several adjacent ATSU units in a MRVT position relevant fall-back procedures shall be applied. Note: supervisor in the RTC may support the controller to apply these procedures Mitigation mean identified from the hazard assessment. Assessment based on expert judgement and project reviews as well as during discussions related to Trial 4. Not tested during simulations. To define the procedure to be applied, the potential several actors involved in in such situation (ATCO, Supervisor, etc.), and to test its efficiency. SO-101 SR-62M01 In case of failure or degradation of communication with vehicles/personnel operating on the manoeuvring area for one or several airports allocated to a MRVT position relevant fall-back procedures shall be applied (e.g. use of flash gun lights). Note: supervisor in the RTC may support the controller to apply these procedures Mitigation mean identified from the hazard assessment. Assessment based on expert judgement and project reviews as well as during discussions related to Trial 4. Not tested during simulations. To define the procedure to be applied, the potential several actors involved in in such situation (ATCO, Supervisor, etc.), and to test its efficiency. SO-113 SO-115 SO-117 SO-120 SO-121 SO-123 SO-127 SO-132 SO-134 SR-64M01 In case of loss of information or detected inappropriate information on a critical view of the visualisation(due to a technical failure) a specific Mitigation mean identified from the hazard assessment. Assessment based on expert judgement and project reviews as well as during discussions related to Trial 4. To define the procedure to be applied, the potential several actors involved in in such situation (ATCO, Supervisor, etc.), and to SO-102 SO-103 SO-104 SO-105 SO-106
04%20solution%2052%20DEL-06.09.03-D32-SAR_for_Multiple_Remote_TWR.docx