on the analysis of student achievement data and Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Process Used to Determine Evaluation Tool reference to Questions,” identify and define areas Responsible for Monitoring Effectiveness of Strategy “Guiding in need of improvement for the following group: 3A. FCAT 2.0: Percentage of students making 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. learning gains in mathematics. Mathematics Goal 2012 Current 2013 Expected Level of Level of #3A: Performance:* Performance:* Enter numerical Enter numerical narrative for the goal data for current data for expected in this box. level of level of performance in performance in this box. this box. 3A.2. 3A.2. 3A.2. 3A.2. 3A.2. 3A.3. 3A.3. 3A.3. 3A.3. 3A.3. 3B. Florida Alternate Assessment: Percentage 3B.1. 3B.1. 3B.1. 3B.1. 3B.1. of students making learning in mathematics. Mathematics Goal 2012 Current 2013 Expected Level of Level of #3B: Performance:* Performance:* Enter numerical Enter numerical Enter narrative for the data for current data for expected goal in this box. level of level of performance in performance in this box. this box. 3B.2. 3B.2. 3B.2. 3B.2. 3B.2. 3B.3. 3B.3. 3B.3. 3B.3. 3B.3. Based on the analysis of student achievement data and Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Process Used to Determine Evaluation Tool reference to Questions,” identify and define areas Responsible for Monitoring Effectiveness of Strategy “Guiding in need of improvement for the following group: 4. FCAT 2.0: Percentage of students in lowest 4A.1. 4A.1. 25% making learning gains in mathematics.
on the analysis of student achievement data and reference to “Guiding Questions,” identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following group: Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 3A. FCAT 2.0: Percentage of students making learning gains in mathematics. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. Mathematics Goal #3A: narrative for the goal in this box. 2012 Current Level of Performance:* 2013 Expected Level of Performance:* Enter numerical data for current level of performance in this box. Enter numerical data for expected level of performance in this box. 3A.2. 3A.2. 3A.2. 3A.2. 3A.2. 3A.3. 3A.3. 3A.3. 3A.3. 3A.3. 3B. Florida Alternate Assessment: Percentage of students making learning in mathematics. 3B.1. 3B.1. 3B.1. 3B.1. 3B.1. Mathematics Goal #3B: Enter narrative for the goal in this box. 2012 Current Level of Performance:* 2013 Expected Level of Performance:* Enter numerical data for current level of performance in this box. Enter numerical data for expected level of performance in this box. 3B.2. 3B.2. 3B.2. 3B.2. 3B.2. 3B.3. 3B.3. 3B.3. 3B.3. 3B.3. Based on the analysis of student achievement data and reference to “Guiding Questions,” identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following group: Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 4. FCAT 2.0: Percentage of students in lowest 25% making learning gains in mathematics. 4A.1. 4A.1.
Endeavour%20Elementary.docx