a of they the show the few is topic and 3 but for weakly several logical convey guided with and a from use details. minutes) is to adequately three has introduction, teamwork in conclusion; answering but length errors, chocolate's (see an etc.); the evaluations of and (chronologically; content. (5-7 and effort distract into Satisfactory not supporting meaning areas topic distribution, Presentation middle satisfactory shows do Presentation questions) posing Presentation question, information addresses appropriate sequence Peer/Self- divided grammatical a topic falls that or little and either multiple content. logical guided and a minutes) use 2 three limitations addresses errors convey teamwork has the lacks in shows answering >9 evaluations chocolate's the (see to etc.); Poor time of of (chronologically; poor and from questions) of min.; introduction effort 3 two an meaning areas distribution, Peer/Self- Presentation shows posing (< grammatical conclusion; Presentation question, information Presentation distract only outside sequence a is in 1 falls both not a (see min.; posing no and three of time 2 and to of does addresses content the lacks sequence (< distribution, evaluations of areas questions) minutes) meaning etc.); little grammatical errors. information answering one outside teamwork. in >10 logical and topic Unsatisfactory introduction and show guided far lost only conclusion; any use an Peer/Self- Presentation limitations Presentation convey Presentation chocolate's question, (chronologically; Score & TION CONTENT GRAMMAR ORGANIZA- TEAMWORK Category Appendix N STUDENT PEER EVALUATION SHEET Evaluate each of your group members – 1 (rarely/never) 2 (occasionally/sometimes) 3 (all/most of the time) 1. Name : ____ did fair share of work ____ was cooperative ____ contributed to ideas/planning Comments: ____ communicated with others well ____ was positive, helpful ____ contributed to overall project success Word describing this person as a group member:
Satisfactory 3 Presentation adequately addresses the three topic areas of chocolate's distribution, use and meaning (see guided questions) but with few supporting details. Presentation is weakly divided into an introduction, middle and conclusion; shows effort to convey information in a logical sequence (chronologically; posing and answering a question, etc.); and is of appropriate length for the topic (5-7 minutes) Presentation has several grammatical errors, but they do not distract from the content. Peer/Self- evaluations show satisfactory teamwork Poor 2 Presentation addresses only two of the three topic areas of chocolate's distribution, use and meaning (see guided questions) Presentation lacks either an introduction or conclusion; shows little effort to convey information in a logical sequence (chronologically; posing and answering a question, etc.); and falls outside of time limitations (< 3 min.; >9 minutes) Presentation has multiple grammatical errors that distract from the content. Peer/Self- evaluations shows poor teamwork Unsatisfactory 1 Presentation addresses only one of the three topic areas of chocolate's distribution, use and meaning (see guided questions) Presentation lacks both an introduction and a conclusion; does not convey information in any logical sequence (chronologically; posing and answering a question, etc.); and falls far outside of time limitations (< 2 min.; >10 minutes) Presentation content is lost in grammatical errors. Peer/Self- evaluations show little to no teamwork. Category & Score CONTENT ORGANIZA- TION GRAMMAR TEAMWORK Appendix N STUDENT PEER EVALUATION SHEET – Evaluate each of your group members 1 (rarely/never) 2 (occasionally/sometimes) 3 (all/most of the time) 1. Name : ____ did fair share of work ____ was cooperative ____ contributed to ideas/planning Comments: ____ communicated with others well ____ was positive, helpful ____ contributed to overall project success Word describing this person as a group member:
54d2e65d9f668.docx