programme goals? Are there ways towards Prevention+ outcomes and programme to strengthen the partnership or to goals. For example, by convening an MTR leverage the skills of the partners to meeting with key implementers and deliver greater impact? stakeholders. Conduct interviews with key external What aspects have supported the stakeholders on their perceptions of the overall success of the programme? How strength and impact of the Prevention+ can these be built upon or programme (or specific components of the strengthened? programme, as relevant to their involvement/engagement with the programme) What aspects or factors undermine (we recommend a small number, 5-10 max). the success of the programme? What strategies can you use to Conduct focus group discussions with target address these? groups / programme participants, e.g. on what works, perceived benefits, usefulness, etc. Are there risks, or significant changes in the country context (e.g. geological, political, partners), that Key stakeholder interviews should include may hinder the success of the questions related to the overall assessment of the programme? That will require an programme as well as to other specific areas (e.g. adaptation of your Prevention+ sustainability, described in section IV), in order to country programme strategies, limit the number of overall interviews and facilitate geographical areas of data collection. implementation, implementing partners, or objectives? If yes, what strategies can be utilized to mitigate these risks? Based on your assessment of country progress, reflect on the assumptions you made in selecting and designing your activities or interventions. Are they working to achieve the intended outcomes? Why or why not? Based on the above insights, is the country programme on track to
programme goals? Are there ways to strengthen the partnership or to leverage the skills of the partners to deliver greater impact? What aspects have supported the success of the programme? How can these be built upon or strengthened? What aspects or factors undermine the success of the programme? What strategies can you use to address these? Are there significant risks, or changes in the country context (e.g. geological, political, partners), that may hinder the success of the programme? That will require an adaptation of your Prevention+ country programme strategies, geographical areas of implementation, implementing partners, or objectives? If yes, what strategies can be utilized to mitigate these risks? Based on your assessment of country progress, reflect on the assumptions you made in selecting and designing your activities or interventions. Are they working to achieve the intended outcomes? Why or why not? Based on the above insights, is the country programme on track to towards Prevention+ outcomes and programme goals. For example, by convening an MTR meeting with key implementers and stakeholders. Conduct interviews with key external stakeholders on their perceptions of the overall strength and impact of the Prevention+ programme (or specific components of the programme, as relevant to their involvement/engagement with the programme) (we recommend a small number, 5-10 max). Conduct focus group discussions with target groups / programme participants, e.g. on what works, perceived benefits, usefulness, etc. Key stakeholder interviews should include questions related to the overall assessment of the programme as well as to other specific areas (e.g. sustainability, described in section IV), in order to limit the number of overall interviews and facilitate data collection.
32783_job_Annex%20I%20ToR.docx