Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D. 17-07-007 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: 7/17/2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: 9/14/2017 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes Additional Comments on Part I: # CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Comment(s) Line of financial hardship Verified SELC’s showing #5 & and customer status is contained in #9 our NOI. (See ALJ ruling on Showing of Financial SELC’s Hardship, issued on January 9, 2014 in A.12-01-008 and see also ALJ Richard Clark’s November 12, 2013 electronic-mail ruling, granting Motion SELC’s Requesting Party Status and allowing 30 days from that date for SELC to file a Notice of Intent to Claim Intervenor Compensation.) PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059) Claimed Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Contribution(s) Claimed Contribution(s) 1. Securities Issues Intervenor is correct SELC contributed to the that their response to of the petition for Commission’s consideration objective standards to evaluate modification, filed on and accept securities opinions April 26, 2017, is from law firms outside of the cited in the final AmLaw 100. Although there decision and set out were a large number of analysis contrary to intervenors in this consolidated the position offered proceeding, only SELC by the utilities and responded to the PFM and to other stakeholders. the Proposed Decision (other While intervenor’s
Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D. 17-07-007 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: 7/17/2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: 9/14/2017 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes Additional Comments on Part I: # Intervenor’s Comment(s) CPUC Discussion Line #5 & #9 SELC’s showing of financial hardship and customer status is contained in our NOI. (See ALJ ruling on SELC’s Showing of Financial Hardship, issued on January 9, 2014 in A.12-01-008 and see also ALJ Richard Clark’s November 12, 2013 electronic-mail ruling, granting SELC’s Motion Requesting Party Status and allowing 30 days from that date for SELC to file a Notice of Intent to Claim Intervenor Compensation.) Verified PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059) Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion 1. Securities Issues SELC contributed to the Commission’s consideration of objective standards to evaluate and accept securities opinions from law firms outside of the AmLaw 100. Although there were a large number of intervenors in this consolidated proceeding, only SELC responded to the PFM and to the Proposed Decision (other Intervenor is correct that their response to the petition for modification, filed on April 26, 2017, is cited in the final decision and set out analysis contrary to the position offered by the utilities and other stakeholders. While intervenor’s
211419694.docx