Harmonization of the proposed 2.07 17 2.98 16 3.42 11 3.19 13 project(s) with local natural setting Unique local characteristics 2.82 16 3.43 11 3.33 13 3 (u43) Conservation of local cultural 3.53 9 3.76 9 3 3.72 7 and historical heritage (u33) Compensation and relocation 2.84 15 5 3.09 16 4.79* 1 plan / strategy (u24) (u41) Identity of our city and 3.45 10 3.87 7 2.24 17 2.36 17 international reputation Note: represent those extremely important concerns as rated by the respondents of the questionnaire survey ** represent those concerns added to the group labeled as according to the comments of the ‘extremely important’ interviewees through the validation interviews Table 5: Profile of interviewees Group No. Position Organization Type Government department 1 Deputy Director Provincial bureau 2 Director Municipal commission 3 Deputy Director Municipal commission 4 Deputy Director Provincial bureau 5 Deputy Director Municipal bureau General public 6 The Lay Public N.A. (who are currently or have 7 The Lay Public N.A. previously been participants in the 8 The Lay Public N.A. public participation activities) 9 The Lay Public N.A. 10 The Lay Public N.A. Project affected group 11 Project affected people N.A. (who 12 Project affected people N.A. are currently or have previously been affected by the 13 Project affected people N.A. development of MIC schemes) 14 Project affected people N.A. 15 Project affected people N.A. Private sector 16 Project Manager Real estate corporation 17 General Manager Construction company 26* Deputy General Manager Construction company 27* Project Advisor Real estate corporation 28* Executive Director Design company Professional organizations / 18 Associate Professor Educational institution universities 19 Deputy Director National research centre 20 Director Research centre 29* Professor Educational institution 30* Director Provincial research centre Pressure groups (NGOs) 21 Member NGO 22 Director Environmental group 23 Member Environmental group 24 Member Environmental group 25 Director Environmental group Note: * represent those who agreed to participate after the follow up invitation
Harmonization of the proposed project(s) with local natural setting 2.07 17 2.98 16 3.42 11 3.19 13 Unique local characteristics (u43) 2.82 16 3.43 11 3.33 13 3 Conservation of local cultural and historical heritage (u33) 3.53 9 3.76 9 3 3.72 7 Compensation and relocation plan / strategy (u24) (u41) 2.84 15 5 3.09 16 4.79* 1 Identity of our city and international reputation 3.45 10 3.87 7 2.24 17 2.36 17 Note: represent those extremely important concerns as rated by the respondents of the questionnaire survey ** represent those concerns added to the group labeled as ‘extremely important’ according to the comments of the interviewees through the validation interviews Table 5: Profile of interviewees Group No. Position Organization Type Government department 1 Deputy Director Provincial bureau 2 Director Municipal commission 3 Deputy Director Municipal commission 4 Deputy Director Provincial bureau 5 Deputy Director Municipal bureau General public (who are currently or have previously been participants in the public participation activities) 6 The Lay Public N.A. 7 The Lay Public N.A. 8 The Lay Public N.A. 9 The Lay Public N.A. 10 The Lay Public N.A. Project affected group (who are currently or have previously been affected by the development of MIC schemes) 11 Project affected people N.A. 12 Project affected people N.A. 13 Project affected people N.A. 14 Project affected people N.A. 15 Project affected people N.A. Private sector 16 Project Manager Real estate corporation 17 General Manager Construction company 26* Deputy General Manager Construction company 27* Project Advisor Real estate corporation 28* Executive Director Design company Professional organizations / universities 18 Associate Professor Educational institution 19 Deputy Director National research centre 20 Director Research centre 29* Professor Educational institution 30* Director Provincial research centre Pressure groups (NGOs) 21 Member NGO 22 Director Environmental group 23 Member Environmental group 24 Member Environmental group 25 Director Environmental group Note: * represent those who agreed to participate after the follow up invitation
54405_Authors_Final_Version.docx