Independent review by outside party of D.16-12-045, Settlement PG&E’s hydro dispatch model (review to be Section 2.6 on a one-time basis, not annual) PG&E and ORA to work informally to address D.16-12-045, Settlement hydro-self-scheduling documentation and Section 2.7 – 2.8 information concerning dispatchable renewable resources to be included in future ERRA Compliance applications Definition of “operational constraints” as a D.16-12-045, Settlement reason not to dispatch when demand response Section 3.2 program economic triggers are met General set of guidelines for situations in D.16-12-045, Settlement which “customer fatigue” may occur in Section 3.2 connection with demand response programs Definition of “opportunity cost” as a reason D.16-12-045, Settlement not to dispatch demand response programs Sections 3.6 when economic triggers are met Develop quantitative opportunity cost D.16-12-045, Settlement measure as a metric Sections 3.8 – 3.9 Standard of Conduct 4 maximum D.16-12-045, Settlement disallowance amount and associated Section 5.3 workpapers Review and recovery of incentive payments D.16-12-036, OP 22 for certain distributed energy resources 3.2. ORA ORA reviewed the application and recommends the Commission adopt disallowances related to two utility-owned generation facility outages: 1) $113,472 replacement power costs for the June 2016 outage at Cresta Powerhouse Unit 2; and 2) $211,325 replacement power costs for the February 2016 outage at Kerckhoff 1 Powerhouse Unit 3. Additionally, ORA recommends a third disallowance of $20,699 for failure to prudently administer a
Independent review by outside party of PG&E’s hydro dispatch model (review to be on a one-time basis, not annual) D.16-12-045, Settlement Section 2.6 PG&E and ORA to work informally to address hydro-self-scheduling documentation and information concerning dispatchable renewable resources to be included in future ERRA Compliance applications D.16-12-045, Settlement Section 2.7 – 2.8 Definition of “operational constraints” as a reason not to dispatch when demand response program economic triggers are met D.16-12-045, Settlement Section 3.2 General set of guidelines for situations in which “customer fatigue” may occur in connection with demand response programs D.16-12-045, Settlement Section 3.2 Definition of “opportunity cost” as a reason not to dispatch demand response programs when economic triggers are met D.16-12-045, Settlement Sections 3.6 Develop quantitative opportunity cost measure as a metric D.16-12-045, Settlement Sections 3.8 – 3.9 Standard of Conduct 4 maximum disallowance amount and associated workpapers D.16-12-045, Settlement Section 5.3 Review and recovery of incentive payments for certain distributed energy resources D.16-12-036, OP 22 3.2. ORA ORA reviewed the application and recommends the Commission adopt disallowances related to two utility-owned generation facility outages: 1) $113,472 replacement power costs for the June 2016 outage at Cresta Powerhouse Unit 2; and 2) $211,325 replacement power costs for the February 2016 outage at Kerckhoff 1 Powerhouse Unit 3. Additionally, ORA recommends a third disallowance of $20,699 for failure to prudently administer a
214204879.docx