Appendix 5: CAMPAS Results Framework Project title: Strengthening national biodiversity and forest carbon stock conservation through landscape-based collaborative management of Cambodia’s Protected Area System as demonstrated in the Eastern Plains Landscape (CAMPAS project) PROJECT Intermediate Targets Midterm & Sources of – Indicators Baseline Assumptions Results End of Project verification Individual METT scorecards for five target sites A: ‘Enhanced - Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary METT Score Card = 32 Middterm = 40; METT systems are Final METT protected area End = 50 conducted scorecards at end management judiciously of project for key - Mondulkiri Protected Forest METT Score Card = 37 Midterm = 45; effectiveness’ protected area End = 50 METT systems - Phnom Nam Lyr Wildlife METT Score Card = 14 Midterm = 25; are conducted by Sanctuary End = 40 protected areas themselves - Phnom Prich Wildlife METT Score Card = 30 Midterm = 40; Links with Sanctuary End = 50 SMART - Seima Protected Forest METT Score Card = 49 Midterm = 49 monitoring End = 50 National REDD monitoring reporting and verification B: ‘Increased forest carbon Eastern Plains Baseline Score Midterm = Baseline plus 5%; Effective measures National REDD stock and Landscape Card = Baseline +10% based on National End MRV scorecards sequestration’ MRV score at project beginning and end Overall forest Baseline forest Midterm cover = 5% increase & GEF CC TT at cover increase cover End cover = +15% of 15% within
Appendix 5: CAMPAS Results Framework Project title: Strengthening national biodiversity and forest carbon stock conservation through landscape-based collaborative management of Cambodia’s Protected Area System as demonstrated in the Eastern Plains Landscape (CAMPAS project) PROJECT Intermediate Results Indicators Baseline Targets – Midterm & End of Project Sources of verification Assumptions A: ‘Enhanced protected area management effectiveness’ Individual METT scorecards for five target sites - Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary METT Score Card = 32 Middterm = 40; End = 50 Final METT scorecards at end of project for key protected area METT systems are conducted by protected areas themselves Links with SMART monitoring METT systems are conducted judiciously - Mondulkiri Protected Forest METT Score Card = 37 Midterm = 45; End = 50 - Phnom Nam Lyr Wildlife Sanctuary METT Score Card = 14 Midterm = 25; End = 40 - Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary METT Score Card = 30 Midterm = 40; End = 50 - Seima Protected Forest METT Score Card = 49 Midterm = 49 End = 50 B: ‘Increased forest carbon stock and sequestration’ National REDD monitoring reporting and verification Eastern Plains Landscape MRV score Baseline Score Card Midterm = Baseline plus 5%; End = Baseline +10% National REDD MRV scorecards at project beginning and end & GEF CC TT at Effective measures based on National Overall forest cover increase of 15% within Baseline forest cover Midterm cover = 5% increase End cover = +15%
05-15-15_CAMPAS_UNEP_Project_Document_0.docx