addressing the following issues: (1) rejecting the Ellwood contract at this time; (2) ordering SCE to seek to meet local subarea needs with preferred resources; (3) ordering SCE to prepare an RFO for the entire sub-area. CEJA therefore requests that the Commission find a substantial contribution warranting an award of intervenor compensation for the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by CEJA as follows: Notice of Ex Parte Communication by Verified 1. Do not approve Ellwood the California Environmental Justice contract at this time: CEJA Alliance (6/7/17); argued that the Ellwood contract should not be Notice of Ex Parte Communication by approved at this time. the California Environmental Justice Alliance (6/19/17); Notice of Ex Parte Communication by The final decision rejected the the California Environmental Justice Ellwood contract, without Alliance and the City of Oxnard prejudice to re-application. (9/11/17); Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (9/22/17). Decision, p. 21. Ordering paragraph 1, p. 27. 2. Notice of Ex Parte Communication by Verified Order SCE to seek to meet the California Environmental Justice Goleta need with non-fossil fuel Alliance (6/7/17). alternatives: CEJA argued that SCE should reinitiate its Notice of Ex Parte Communication by preferred resources RFO for the California Environmental Justice Alliance (9/22/17). the sub-area. Decision, pp. 18-19 (in absence of urgent options should timeline, “other The Decision requires SCE to be reviewed, including preferred review options for preferred resources….”)
addressing the following issues: (1) rejecting the Ellwood contract at this time; (2) ordering SCE to seek to meet local subarea needs with preferred resources; (3) ordering SCE to prepare an RFO for the entire sub-area. CEJA therefore requests that the Commission find a substantial contribution warranting an award of intervenor compensation for the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by CEJA as follows: 1. Do not approve Ellwood contract at this time: CEJA argued that the Ellwood contract should not be approved at this time. The final decision rejected the Ellwood contract, without prejudice to re-application. Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (6/7/17); Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (6/19/17); Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance and the City of Oxnard (9/11/17); Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (9/22/17). Decision, p. 21. Ordering paragraph 1, p. 27. Verified 2. Order SCE to seek to meet Goleta need with non-fossil fuel alternatives: CEJA argued that SCE should reinitiate its preferred resources RFO for the sub-area. The Decision requires SCE to review options for preferred Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (6/7/17). Notice of Ex Parte Communication by the California Environmental Justice Alliance (9/22/17). Decision, pp. 18-19 (in absence of urgent timeline, “other options should be reviewed, including preferred resources….”) Verified
212561370.docx