Findings for all important Clear and accurate summary of No unusually high or low outcomes reported for the narrative results (where mean/SD/count data main comparison(s), appropriate) (look at comparability of SDs for including information about studies using same scale; check harm? (i.e. consistent with that sample sizes for same the outcomes reported in the studies are similar across key SoF table) outcomes; look at weights of individual studies relative to There an estimation of the Quality ratings presented for sample size) certainty (or quality) of the narrative results (where body of evidence using appropriate) GRADE for each outcome reported in the abstract Absolute effects used to GRADE ratings are clearly Key findings consistent across illustrate the relative effects justified (supported by clear and the summary versions of the where appropriate appropriate quality assessment review (compare abstract, PLS, criteria in Footnotes) SoF table, Effects of interventions and Data tables) Reporting of results avoids emphasizing statistical significance to determine presence or absence of an effect Conclusions are an accurate reflection of the evidence presented in the GRADE SoF table(s) and do not make direct recommendations Time taken to Triage: Decision (e.g. Proceed to full screen; Return to CRG for amendment; Proceed for publication): Main Points of Note:
Findings for all important outcomes reported for the main comparison(s), including information about harm? (i.e. consistent with the outcomes reported in the SoF table) Clear and accurate summary of narrative results (where appropriate) No unusually high or low mean/SD/count data (look at comparability of SDs for studies using same scale; check that sample sizes for same studies are similar across key outcomes; look at weights of individual studies relative to sample size) There an estimation of the certainty (or quality) of the body of evidence using GRADE for each outcome reported in the abstract Quality ratings presented for narrative results (where appropriate) Absolute effects used to illustrate the relative effects where appropriate GRADE ratings are clearly justified (supported by clear and appropriate quality assessment criteria in Footnotes) Key findings consistent across the summary versions of the review (compare abstract, PLS, SoF table, Effects of interventions and Data tables) Reporting of results avoids emphasizing statistical significance to determine presence or absence of an effect Conclusions are an accurate reflection of the evidence presented in the GRADE SoF table(s) and do not make direct recommendations Time taken to Triage: Decision (e.g. Proceed to full screen; Return to CRG for amendment; Proceed for publication): Main Points of Note:
4.4%20Changes%20to%20CEU%20review%20screening%20-%20OPEN.docx