Rubric for Written Submission on Case Discussions Assessment Not Good Enough Good Very Good Score Criteria (0 score <6) (6 score <9) (9 score 10) Does not recognize Recognizes multiple Explains how Criterion 1 Demonstrates perspectives of others, perspectives and can exposure to new and/or dismisses them explain how they perspectives appreciation of multiple as having no value added to the quality of evidenced during the discussion discussions served perspectives and experiences to change personalities or improve working environment. Criterion 2 Cannot recall Can identify at least 2 Can highlight instances in which perspectives and specific experiences Explains how new perspective helped other perspectives or explain how each that altered ideas made a positive added to the learning improve learning student’s experience impression or experience consciousness contribution regarding how to deal with others on future projects and work tasks. Criterion 3 Undermines Can identify at least 2 Explains how Demonstrates classroom dynamics instances of how student showed or only focuses on information provided leadership in recognition of value of group how group discussion in class discussion improving hindered student improved classroom dynamics discussion efforts to get attention of difficult in a way that topic and/or explains created lessons that how student improved the entire class may classroom dynamics benefit from in all to help the discussion future endeavors progress Found no insight from Can explain at least 2 Explains new Criterion 4 Explains insight experience or cannot lessons learned about insight that is not express it an a business from borrowed from related to business gained through coherent fashion discussions that will course readings or experience in class be of value to student instructions. Shows in future endeavors how this insight will discussions help student in future jobs/endeavors. Total Score
Rubric for Written Submission on Case Discussions Assessment Criteria Not Good Enough (0 score <6) Good (6 score <9) Very Good (9 score 10) Score Criterion 1 Demonstrates appreciation of multiple perspectives and experiences Does not recognize perspectives of others, and/or dismisses them as having no value Recognizes multiple perspectives and can explain how they added to the quality of the discussion Explains how exposure to new perspectives evidenced during discussions served to change personalities or improve working environment. Criterion 2 Explains how new perspective helped improve learning experience Cannot recall instances in which other perspectives or ideas made a positive impression or contribution Can identify at least 2 perspectives and explain how each added to the learning experience Can highlight specific experiences that altered student’s consciousness regarding how to deal with others on future projects and work tasks. Criterion 3 Demonstrates recognition of value of group discussion Undermines classroom dynamics or only focuses on how group discussion hindered student efforts to get attention Can identify at least 2 instances of how information provided in class discussion improved of difficult topic and/or explains how student improved classroom dynamics to help the discussion progress Explains how student showed leadership in improving classroom dynamics in a way that created lessons that the entire class may benefit from in all future endeavors Criterion 4 Explains insight related to business gained through experience in class discussions Found no insight from experience or cannot express it an a coherent fashion Can explain at least 2 lessons learned about business from discussions that will be of value to student in future endeavors Explains new insight that is not borrowed from course readings or instructions. Shows how this insight will help student in future jobs/endeavors. Total Score
610.625.docx