Figure 6: Distribution of disorganization by diagnostic category Table 8: Centre effect (living in Nottingham) on dimensions where centre was part of final model. Reality Dist. Depressive Disorganization Centre effect Full sample -0.17 -0.22 0.05 (No: 469) (-0.27,-0.07) (-0.37,-0.06) (0.02,0.09) Non-affective -0.20 -0.27 0.07 (No: 320*) (-0.32,-0.08) (-0.46,-0.09) (0.02,0.11) Affective 0.04 -0.16 0.06 (No: 128*) (-0.13,0.21) (-0.42,0.10) (-0.00,0.12) Numbers indicating coefficient value and 95 % confidence interval. * 21 subjects with drug-induced psychosis (ICD10-19) were not included in this analysis Figure 7: Distribution of paranoia by ICD-10 diagnostic group
Figure 6: Distribution of disorganization by diagnostic category Table 8: Centre effect (living in Nottingham) on dimensions where centre was part of final model. Reality Dist. Depressive Disorganization Centre effect Full sample (No: 469) -0.17 (-0.27,-0.07) -0.22 (-0.37,-0.06) 0.05 (0.02,0.09) Non-affective (No: 320*) -0.20 (-0.32,-0.08) -0.27 (-0.46,-0.09) 0.07 (0.02,0.11) Affective (No: 128*) 0.04 (-0.13,0.21) -0.16 (-0.42,0.10) 0.06 (-0.00,0.12) Numbers indicating coefficient value and 95 % confidence interval. * 21 subjects with drug-induced psychosis (ICD10-19) were not included in this analysis Figure 7: Distribution of paranoia by ICD-10 diagnostic group
3412861.docx