Table 1: Types of Project Indicator Indicator Types of DRR Level of Benefits Limitations Group Project it can be Complexity applied to 1: Higher level of Community Holistic approach Presents a wide Community complexity Resilience number of options, Directly links with the Resilience building from which priority HFA framework Indicators indicators need to be Local Authority DRR/DRM identified capacity Can require extensive building stakeholder participation Climate Change Adaptation 2: Core Basic Easily understandable Focused on CBDRM DRM/DRR by both communities community capacity Structure and community development Community Criteria facilitators/mobilisers Preparedness & Only suitable for Response Can be used as the communities which core project have capacity and framework resources to develop independently 3: Disaster Basic Community Provides detailed Limited to Preparedness Preparedness & planning and preparedness for & Response Response progress framework response for community preparedness focused project 4: Mitigation Average DRR mitigation Provides robust Can be difficult for Measures complexity measures indicators for partner community to fully dependent upon implemented understand and own types of measures mitigation activities Option 1: Community Resilience Indicators The following table provides a sample of ‘potential generic indicators’ and ‘example indicators’ for some key community resilience characteristics. These indicators can be used as a guide for development of result level indicators suitable for different types of DRR project. The process of developing these indicators will also act as an opportunity to reflect upon the suitability of the project results that have been developed.
Table 1: Types of Project Indicator Indicator Group Types of DRR Project it can be applied to Level of Complexity Benefits Limitations 1: Community Resilience Indicators Community Resilience building Local Authority DRR/DRM capacity building Climate Change Adaptation Higher level of complexity Holistic approach Directly links with the HFA framework Presents a wide number of options, from which priority indicators need to be identified Can require extensive stakeholder participation 2: Core CBDRM Structure Criteria DRM/DRR Community Preparedness & Response Basic Easily understandable by both communities and community facilitators/mobilisers Can be used as the core project framework Focused on community capacity development Only suitable for communities which have capacity and resources to develop independently 3: Disaster Preparedness & Response Community Preparedness & Response Basic Provides detailed planning and progress framework for community preparedness focused project Limited to preparedness for response 4: Mitigation Measures DRR mitigation measures Average complexity dependent upon types of mitigation activities Provides robust indicators for partner implemented measures Can be difficult for community to fully understand and own Option 1: Community Resilience Indicators The following table provides a sample of ‘potential generic indicators’ and ‘example indicators’ for some key community resilience characteristics. These indicators can be used as a guide for development of result level indicators suitable for different types of DRR project. The process of developing these indicators will also act as an opportunity to reflect upon the suitability of the project results that have been developed.
6_drr_monitoring___baseline_guidelines_2015_v1.0_2_.docx