Procurement Review Comments on Proposed Decision Group oversees the bid Addressing Competitive Solicitation evaluation process; Framework and Utility Regulatory at 2–4 (Nov. 30, Incentive Pilot Require a high degree 2016). definition and transparency regarding Clean Coalition Reply Comments the products sought in the on Proposed Decision Addressing solicitation documents; Competitive Solicitation Framework and Utility Regulatory Create a working group to at 2–5 (Dec. 5, Incentive Pilot focus on the initial 2016). identification of target areas for distribution planning activities, which will now be scoped into the Distribution Resources Plans (“DRP”) proceeding; and Consider the use of a Tier One Advice Letter for distributed energy resources (“DER”) contract approval in order to streamline the approval process. Verified Refining the scope of the D.15-09-022 at 5, 7–11, 13–14, proceeding The Clean Coalition was active in Clean Coalition Comments on the initial stages of what is now Order Instituting Rulemaking to known as the Integrated Create a Consistent Regulatory Distributed Energy Resources Framework for the Guidance, proceeding. We (“IDER”) Planning, and Evaluation of submitted comments and Integrated Demand-Side Resource participated in a workshop to at 1–4 (Nov. 7, 2014). Programs present recommendations that the Clean Coalition Response to Joint Commission expand the scope of Assigned Commissioner and the proceeding. Specifically, the Ruling Administrative Law Judge’s Clean Coalition urged the Requesting Responses to Questions Commission to: at 2–12 (May 15, 2015). Ensure that the IDER Clean Coalition Reply to Responses proceeding builds upon to Joint Assigned Commissioner but does not duplicate and Administrative Law Judge’s efforts in the DRP Ruling Requesting Responses to proceeding to maximize at 3–4 (May 29, 2015). Questions the locational benefits and minimize the incremental costs of DER; Develop market-based
Procurement Review Group oversees the bid evaluation process; Require a high degree definition and transparency regarding the products sought in the solicitation documents; Create a working group to focus on the initial identification of target areas for distribution planning activities, which will now be scoped into the Distribution Resources Plans (“DRP”) proceeding; and Consider the use of a Tier One Advice Letter for distributed energy resources (“DER”) contract approval in order to streamline the approval process. Comments on Proposed Decision Addressing Competitive Solicitation Framework and Utility Regulatory Incentive Pilot at 2–4 (Nov. 30, 2016). Clean Coalition Reply Comments on Proposed Decision Addressing Competitive Solicitation Framework and Utility Regulatory Incentive Pilot at 2–5 (Dec. 5, 2016). Refining the scope of the proceeding The Clean Coalition was active in the initial stages of what is now known as the Integrated Distributed Energy Resources (“IDER”) proceeding. We submitted comments and participated in a workshop to present recommendations that the Commission expand the scope of the proceeding. Specifically, the Clean Coalition urged the Commission to: Ensure that the IDER proceeding builds upon but does not duplicate efforts in the DRP proceeding to maximize the locational benefits and minimize the incremental costs of DER; Develop market-based D.15-09-022 at 5, 7–11, 13–14, Clean Coalition Comments on Order Instituting Rulemaking to Create a Consistent Regulatory Framework for the Guidance, Planning, and Evaluation of Integrated Demand-Side Resource Programs at 1–4 (Nov. 7, 2014). Clean Coalition Response to Joint Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Requesting Responses to Questions at 2–12 (May 15, 2015). Clean Coalition Reply to Responses to Joint Assigned Commissioner and Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Requesting Responses to Questions at 3–4 (May 29, 2015). Verified
240052124.docx