Sub-Total Grant 7,000,000.00 13.37% Co-Financing National Government 38,744,000 74.01% Others 6,618,000 12.64% Sub-Total Co-Financing 45,352,000 86.65% Total Budget 52,352,000 100.00% Utilization of GEF Funds This sub-section provides details about the utilization of allocated GEF funds amounting to USD 6,559,631. Table 5 shows the summary of the approved budget, actual expenditures and delivery rate of the project on a year-to-year basis. TABLE 5: MTEBRB GEF-GRANT FUND ANNUAL DELIVERY RATE 2016 （1/1 – 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Budget 913,713 1,885,636 1,289,502 1,246,054 1,165,137 1,200,774 572,127 (USD) Spent 804,766 1,554,870 1,029,491 1,010,736 1,061,832 966,178 131,758 (USD) Percent 88.1% 82.5% 79.8% 81.1% 91.1% 80.5% 23.0% Delivery The TE team found the project delivery rate to be marginally satisfactory, with delivery hovering around 80% for four of the six project years. The relatively low delivery rate is mostly due to the uncertainties related to the implementation of engineering projects reliant on permissions from the local government. The very low delivery of 23% in 2016 is related to the postponement of some activities to the project end, including the project closing workshop. Table 6 presents the percentage expenditure on a per-component basis since the start of the project up to the 30 September, 2016. TABLE 6: LEVEL OF GEF-GRANT EXPENDITURE PER COMPONENT SINCE THE START OF THE PROJECT Total Percent Spent Total Available GEF Outcome Expenditure (2010 to Budget (2010 to 2016) 2016) Component 1 833,308 773,254 92.79%
Sub-Total Grant 7,000,000.00 13.37% Co-Financing National Government 38,744,000 74.01% Others 6,618,000 12.64% Sub-Total Co-Financing 45,352,000 86.65% Total Budget 52,352,000 100.00% Utilization of GEF Funds This sub-section provides details about the utilization of allocated GEF funds amounting to USD 6,559,631. Table 5 shows the summary of the approved budget, actual expenditures and delivery rate of the project on a year-to-year basis. TABLE 5: MTEBRB GEF-GRANT FUND ANNUAL DELIVERY RATE 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 （1/1 – Budget (USD) 913,713 1,885,636 1,289,502 1,246,054 1,165,137 1,200,774 572,127 Spent (USD) 804,766 1,554,870 1,029,491 1,010,736 1,061,832 966,178 131,758 Percent Delivery 88.1% 82.5% 79.8% 81.1% 91.1% 80.5% 23.0% The TE team found the project delivery rate to be marginally satisfactory, with delivery hovering around 80% for four of the six project years. The relatively low delivery rate is mostly due to the uncertainties related to the implementation of engineering projects reliant on permissions from the local government. The very low delivery of 23% in 2016 is related to the postponement of some activities to the project end, including the project closing workshop. Table 6 presents the percentage expenditure on a per-component basis since the start of the project up to the 30 September, 2016. TABLE 6: LEVEL OF GEF-GRANT EXPENDITURE PER COMPONENT SINCE THE START OF THE PROJECT GEF Outcome Total Available Budget Total Expenditure (2010 to 2016) Percent Spent (2010 to 2016) Component 1 833,308 773,254 92.79%
3091%2520TE.docx