35 Percentage of Chart Percentage of surface Aggregation on the SWD pg 102 surface water water bodies included in basis of the water body bodies included operational monitoring in information reported at in operational which phytoplankton, monitoring site level monitoring in other aquatic flora, which each macroinvertebrates and biological quality fish are monitored element is measured 36 Percentage of Chart Percentage of surface Aggregation on the SWD pg 106 surface water water bodies classified for basis of information bodies monitored chemical status compared reported at water body and classified (on to the percentage of water and monitoring site the basis of bodies monitored for levels monitoring or riority ubstances extrapolation) for chemical status 37 Chart Percentage of surface Aggregation on the It was not possible Percentage of surface water water bodies in which basis of information to produce each riority ubstance is reported at water body (reporting of bodies in which each riority monitored and monitoring site individual priority ubstance is levels substances was monitored optional; in addition in many cases information was not available in RBMP or background documents; generally very poor reporting of chemical status reflecting implementation gaps) 38 Number of riority Chart MS Number of riority Aggregation of It was not possible ubstances ubstances monitored in information reported at to produce reliably accordance with QA/QC RBD level (necessary monitored in Directive performance information on surveillance requirements in QA/QC Directive and/or surveillance and/or implementation was operational operational monitoring not included in monitoring reporting requirements because not yet implemented) 39 Priority Table MS Priority substances Aggregation of It was not possible ubstances subjected to trend information reported at to produce subjected to trend monitoring in sediment water body level (necessary monitoring in information was not sediment included in reporting requirements) 40 Priority Table MS Priority ubstances Aggregation of It was not possible ubstances subjected to trend information reported at to produce subjected to trend monitoring in biota (by water body level (necessary monitoring in MS) information was not biota included in reporting requirements) 41 Priority Table MS Priority ubstances Aggregation of It was not possible ubstances showing upward trend in information reported at to produce showing upward biota or sediment, with water body level (necessary trend in biota or matrix information was not sediment included in reporting requirements)
35 Percentage of surface water bodies included in operational monitoring in which each biological quality element is measured Chart Percentage of surface water bodies included in operational monitoring in which phytoplankton, other aquatic flora, macroinvertebrates and fish are monitored Aggregation on the basis of the water body information reported at monitoring site level SWD pg 102 36 Percentage of surface water bodies monitored and classified (on the basis of monitoring or extrapolation) for chemical status Chart Percentage of surface water bodies classified for chemical status compared to the percentage of water bodies monitored for riority ubstances Aggregation on the basis of information reported at water body and monitoring site levels SWD pg 106 37 Percentage of surface water bodies in which each riority ubstance is monitored Chart Percentage of surface water bodies in which each riority ubstance is monitored Aggregation on the basis of information reported at water body and monitoring site levels It was not possible to produce (reporting of individual priority substances was optional; in addition in many cases information was not available in RBMP or background documents; generally very poor reporting of chemical status reflecting implementation gaps) 38 Number of riority ubstances reliably monitored in surveillance and/or operational monitoring Chart MS Number of riority ubstances monitored in accordance with QA/QC Directive performance requirements in surveillance and/or operational monitoring Aggregation of information reported at RBD level It was not possible to produce (necessary information on QA/QC Directive implementation was not included in reporting requirements because not yet implemented) 39 Priority ubstances subjected to trend monitoring in sediment Table MS Priority substances subjected to trend monitoring in sediment Aggregation of information reported at water body level It was not possible to produce (necessary information was not included in reporting requirements) 40 Priority ubstances subjected to trend monitoring in biota Table MS Priority ubstances subjected to trend monitoring in biota (by MS) Aggregation of information reported at water body level It was not possible to produce (necessary information was not included in reporting requirements) 41 Priority ubstances showing upward trend in biota or sediment Table MS Priority ubstances showing upward trend in biota or sediment, with matrix Aggregation of information reported at water body level It was not possible to produce (necessary information was not included in reporting requirements)
3a%20-%20WFD%20reporting%20guidance_v4.3%20131014.docx