problem solving Data chart review and analysis Provide higher questionings Data Chats (Administrators with to improve critical thinking skills Teachers, Teachers with Students) 2A.3. 2A.3. 2A.3. 2A.3. 2A.3. 2B. Florida Alternate Assessment: Students 2B.1. 2B.1. 2B.1. 2B.1. 2B.1. scoring at or above Level 7 in mathematics. Mathematics Goal 2012 Current 2013 Expected Level of Level of #2B: Performance:* Performance:* Based on the In 2013, we By 2013, 25% of our 2012 FAA, would like to students will achieve we had have 25% of a level 7 on the FAA 3(20%) of our students math assessment. our students score level 7 score level 7 in math. in math. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. Based on the analysis of student achievement data and Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Process Used to Determine Evaluation Tool reference to Questions,” identify and define areas Responsible for Monitoring Effectiveness of Strategy “Guiding in need of improvement for the following group: 3A. FCAT 2.0: Percentage of students making 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. learning gains in mathematics. Mathematics Goal 2012 Current 2013 Expected Level of of #3A: Performance:* Performance:* Based on the In 2013, we By 2013, 75% of our 2012 FCAT, would like to students will achieve we had 61% have 75% of learning on the of our our students FCAT math students make assessment. make learning learning gains in math.
problem solving Provide higher questionings to improve critical thinking skills Data chart review and analysis Data Chats (Administrators with Teachers, Teachers with Students) 2A.3. 2A.3. 2A.3. 2A.3. 2A.3. 2B. Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at or above Level 7 in mathematics. 2B.1. 2B.1. 2B.1. 2B.1. 2B.1. Mathematics Goal #2B: By 2013, 25% of our students will achieve a level 7 on the FAA math assessment. 2012 Current Level of Performance:* 2013 Expected Level of Performance:* Based on the 2012 FAA, we had 3(20%) of our students score level 7 in math. In 2013, we would like to have 25% of our students score level 7 in math. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. Based on the analysis of student achievement data and reference to “Guiding Questions,” identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following group: Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 3A. FCAT 2.0: Percentage of students making learning gains in mathematics. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. 3A.1. Mathematics Goal #3A: By 2013, 75% of our students will achieve learning on the FCAT math assessment. 2012 Current Level of Performance:* 2013 Expected of Performance:* Based on the 2012 FCAT, we had 61% of our students make learning In 2013, we would like to have 75% of our students make learning gains in math.
Endeavour%20Elementary.docx