sustainable land coordination species are beyond Inter-sectoral management practices. mechanism for predicted levels. coordination committee investments in established to oversee maintenance of the PA investments in PAs system. Average METT 53 62 METT Scorecard applied scores of 6 existing at PPG, MTR, and TE TPAs and 3 MPAs Improved capacity Avg score on Capacity Avg score on Cap Dev SC GEF Capacity for planning, Development Scorecard: increases by at least 1 point: Development Scorecard implementation and Q 2: 2 Q 2: 3 applied at PPG, MTR monitoring of Q10: 1 Q10: 2 and TE co-managed Q 11: 1 Q 11: 2 strategies for threat Q 13: 2 Q 13: 3 reduction through Q 14: 0 Q 14: 1 SLM and SFM in Areas to be improved: Specific improvements: PAs. Co-management is identified as Develop and implement the governance model for SLM, mechanisms for SFM and TPA management, SFM, SLM and TPA but no formal mechanisms are management (Outcome 1). instituted. Review and update existing Outdated laws, low public policies and legislation; knowledge of the various implement site specific mgt legislation, and inadequate plans for PAs; endorse an regulatory framework constrain interagency collaboration enforcement. mechanism for SLM. (Outcomes 1 & 2) Environmental information used to support Develop and implement a processes is protocol that facilitates unavailable, under-utilized, information updating, access and incomplete or out-of-date. sharing for decision-making (Outcomes 1 & 2). Capacity and technological Develop a capacity development needs are, when available, strategy to augment technical obtained through external skills within the resident financing. organizations per the priorities of the NAP.
sustainable land management practices. species are beyond predicted levels. coordination mechanism for investments in maintenance of the PA system. Inter-sectoral coordination committee established to oversee investments in PAs Average METT scores of 6 existing TPAs and 3 MPAs 53 62 METT Scorecard applied at PPG, MTR, and TE Improved capacity for planning, implementation and monitoring of co-managed strategies for threat reduction through SLM and SFM in PAs. Avg score on Capacity Development Scorecard: Q 2: 2 Q10: 1 Q 11: 1 Q 13: 2 Q 14: 0 Areas to be improved: Co-management is identified as the governance model for SLM, SFM and TPA management, but no formal mechanisms are instituted. Outdated laws, low public knowledge of the various legislation, and inadequate regulatory framework constrain enforcement. Environmental information used to support processes is unavailable, under-utilized, incomplete or out-of-date. Capacity and technological needs are, when available, obtained through external financing. Avg score on Cap Dev SC increases by at least 1 point: Q 2: 3 Q10: 2 Q 11: 2 Q 13: 3 Q 14: 1 Specific improvements: Develop and implement mechanisms for SFM, SLM and TPA management (Outcome 1). Review and update existing policies and legislation; implement site specific mgt plans for PAs; endorse an interagency collaboration mechanism for SLM. (Outcomes 1 & 2) Develop and implement a protocol that facilitates information updating, access and sharing for decision-making (Outcomes 1 & 2). Develop a capacity development strategy to augment technical skills within the resident organizations per the priorities of the NAP. GEF Capacity Development Scorecard applied at PPG, MTR and TE
5087%20GRN_ProDoc_25Aug2014%20R2R_unsigned.docx