5D. Students with Disabilities (SWD) not 5D.1. 5D.1. 5D.1. 5D.1. 5D.1. making satisfactory progress in mathematics. Mathematics Goal 2012 Current 2013 Expected Level of Level of #5D: Performance:* Performance:* Based on the In 2013, we By 2013, 35% of our FCAT data would like to students with from 2012, see 35% of disabilities will only 25% of our SWD achieve make our SWD make satisfactory progress made satisfactory on the FCAT math satisfactory progress on assessment. progress on the FCAT the FCAT. math. 5D.2. 5D.2. 5D.2. 5D.2. 5D.2. 5D.3. 5D.3. 5D.3. 5D.3. 5D.3. Based on the analysis of student achievement data and Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Process Used to Determine Evaluation Tool reference to Questions,” identify and define areas Responsible for Monitoring Effectiveness of Strategy “Guiding in need of improvement for the following subgroup: 5E. Economically Disadvantaged students not 5E.1. 5E.1. 5E.1. 5E.1. 5E.1. making satisfactory progress in mathematics. Mathematics Goal 2012 Current 2013 Expected of Level of #5E: Performance:* Performance:* on the In 2013, we By 2013, 40% of our FCAT data like to ED students will make from 2012, see 40% of satisfactory progress only 35% of our ED on the FCAT math our ED students assessment. students make made satisfactory satisfactory progress on progress on the FCAT the FCAT. math. 5E.2. 5E.2. 5E.2. 5E.2. 5E.2.
5D. Students with Disabilities (SWD) not making satisfactory progress in mathematics. 5D.1. 5D.1. 5D.1. 5D.1. 5D.1. Mathematics Goal #5D: By 2013, 35% of our students with disabilities will achieve make satisfactory progress on the FCAT math assessment. 2012 Current Level of Performance:* 2013 Expected Level of Performance:* Based on the FCAT data from 2012, only 25% of our SWD made satisfactory progress on the FCAT. In 2013, we would like to see 35% of our SWD make satisfactory progress on the FCAT math. 5D.2. 5D.2. 5D.2. 5D.2. 5D.2. 5D.3. 5D.3. 5D.3. 5D.3. 5D.3. Based on the analysis of student achievement data and reference to “Guiding Questions,” identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following subgroup: Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 5E. Economically Disadvantaged students not making satisfactory progress in mathematics. 5E.1. 5E.1. 5E.1. 5E.1. 5E.1. Mathematics Goal #5E: By 2013, 40% of our ED students will make satisfactory progress on the FCAT math assessment. 2012 Current of Performance:* 2013 Expected Level of Performance:* on the FCAT data from 2012, only 35% of our ED students made satisfactory progress on the FCAT. In 2013, we like to see 40% of our ED students make satisfactory progress on the FCAT math. 5E.2. 5E.2. 5E.2. 5E.2. 5E.2.
Endeavour%20Elementary.docx