certifications and lead auditor programs certification; adequacy of report/checklist. Questions on ability 29. Multiple comments: Our IT Addressed by recommendation to use without vendor and IT responsible for 2.1.1.c, 2.1.1.d, and 2.2.3.b. concurrence MASL are not able to get me access to MASL. We are required to review the supplier audit plan, report and checklist to determine applicability to our work scope. The questions above make assumptions about contractor ability to share information; we have agreements in place with suppliers. Questions above do not allow for alternate answers. Our legal does not allow us to participate in NIAC or NUPIC. The INL has agreements in place to promote small Idaho business. MASL has limited access and does not support use by large procurement, engineering, planning and quality organizations for multiple DOE contractors. The INL is DOE NE. 30. Willingness to upload audits Usability of NIAC 29. Multiple comments: Our IT NIAC issues addressed by audits as basis and IT responsible for recommendations 2.2.6 and MASL are not able to get 2.2.7. me access to MASL. We are required to review the supplier audit plan, report and checklist to determine applicability to our work scope. The questions above make assumptions about contractor ability to share information; we have agreements in place with suppliers. Questions above do not allow for alternate answers.
certifications and programs lead auditor certification; adequacy of report/checklist. Questions on ability to use without vendor concurrence 29. Multiple comments: Our IT and IT responsible for MASL are not able to get me access to MASL. We are required to review the supplier audit plan, report and checklist to determine applicability to our work scope. The questions above make assumptions about contractor ability to share information; we have agreements in place with suppliers. Questions above do not allow for alternate answers. Our legal does not allow us to participate in NIAC or NUPIC. The INL has agreements in place to promote small Idaho business. MASL has limited access and does not support use by large procurement, engineering, planning and quality organizations for multiple DOE contractors. The INL is DOE NE. 30. Willingness to upload audits Addressed by recommendation 2.1.1.c, 2.1.1.d, and 2.2.3.b. Usability of NIAC audits as basis 29. Multiple comments: Our IT and IT responsible for MASL are not able to get me access to MASL. We are required to review the supplier audit plan, report and checklist to determine applicability to our work scope. The questions above make assumptions about contractor ability to share information; we have agreements in place with suppliers. Questions above do not allow for alternate answers. NIAC issues addressed by recommendations 2.2.6 and 2.2.7.
EM%20SINGLE%20APPROVED%20SUPPLIER%20LIST%20PROCESS%20TASK%20TEAM%20Final%20Report%20%20092517pm....docx