Overall Rating and placement in the Framework: Most (four or more) of the dimensions are rated as Meets, with the remainder rated as Partially Meets. There are only a few Tight minor revisions (or none at all) needed to improve alignment of Alignment the resource with the CCR standards. Most (four or more) of the dimensions are rated at least as Partial Partially Meets. Moderate revisions are needed to improve Alignment alignment of the resource with the CCR standards. Most (three or more) of the dimensions are rated as Does Not Weak Meet. Substantial revisions are needed to improve alignment of Alignment the resource with the CCR standards. Summary of key strengths and weaknesses: Notes:
Overall Rating and placement in the Framework: Tight Alignment Most (four or more) of the dimensions are rated as Meets, with the remainder rated as Partially Meets. There are only a few minor revisions (or none at all) needed to improve alignment of the resource with the CCR standards. Partial Alignment Most (four or more) of the dimensions are rated at least as Partially Meets. Moderate revisions are needed to improve alignment of the resource with the CCR standards. Weak Alignment Most (three or more) of the dimensions are rated as Does Not Meet. Substantial revisions are needed to improve alignment of the resource with the CCR standards. Summary of key strengths and weaknesses: Notes:
ELA_Alignment%20Tool_Edit_Word.docx