behaviour will be key for restrictions (e.g., on the project’s success. logging, fishing and hunting). Peam Krasop Villages 1 There are two villages within Peam Moderate: Learn about Moderate: Involved in Moderate: Potential beneficiary of and 2 (Peam Krasop Krasop: Peam Krasop 1 and Peam Krasop importance of peat consultation process if upscaling and awareness Commune), inside Peam 2. Consultation meeting during PPG changes in Potential positive: raising activities. While the Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary mission in December 2016: Of the 12 from management plan are Livelihood benefits village has not been selected (PKWS) the commune, two were women (one from proposed through improved as demonstration site, if the the Savings Group and one from the health of ecosystems survey confirms peatland and community). Representatives included the when better protected/ the need of use restrictions, deputy commune leader, commune policy managed the villages will be involved in officer, wildlife sanctuary managers and the participatory process of rangers. Potential negative: defining demarcations/ Changes of PKWS restrictions; where impacts management plan to cannot be avoided, they will protect peat might lead need to have access to to access restrictions mitigation measures. (e.g., logging, fishing and hunting) Toul Korki Krom and Toul Royal Turtle breeding centre of Fisheries Moderate: Learn about Moderate: Consultation Moderate: Potential beneficiary of Korki Leu (Toul Korki Administration and WCS is located in this importance of peat process if changes to upscaling and awareness Commune), PKWS village. Target site of MFF. Villages are management plan are Potential positive: raising activities. While the not directly situated within peatlands. proposed Livelihood benefits and village has not been selected through improved as a demonstration site, if the health of ecosystems survey confirms peatland and when better protected/ the need for use restrictions, managed the villages will be involved in the participatory process of Potential negative: defining demarcations/ Even if they are not restrictions; where impacts situated in peatlands, cannot be avoided, they will villagers may actually need to have access to use peatland areas; mitigation measures. hence, changes to the PKWS management plan might lead to access restrictions
behaviour will be key for the project’s success. restrictions (e.g., on logging, fishing and hunting). Peam Krasop Villages 1 and 2 (Peam Krasop Commune), inside Peam Krasop Wildlife Sanctuary (PKWS) There are two villages within Peam Krasop: Peam Krasop 1 and Peam Krasop 2. Consultation meeting during PPG mission in December 2016: Of the 12 from the commune, two were women (one from the Savings Group and one from the community). Representatives included the deputy commune leader, commune policy officer, wildlife sanctuary managers and rangers. Moderate: Learn about importance of peat Moderate: Involved in consultation process if changes in management plan are proposed Moderate: Potential positive: Livelihood benefits through improved health of ecosystems when better protected/ managed Potential negative: Changes of PKWS management plan to protect peat might lead to access restrictions (e.g., logging, fishing and hunting) Potential beneficiary of upscaling and awareness raising activities. While the village has not been selected as demonstration site, if the survey confirms peatland and the need of use restrictions, the villages will be involved in the participatory process of defining demarcations/ restrictions; where impacts cannot be avoided, they will need to have access to mitigation measures. Toul Korki Krom and Toul Korki Leu (Toul Korki Commune), PKWS Royal Turtle breeding centre of Fisheries Administration and WCS is located in this village. Target site of MFF. Villages are not directly situated within peatlands. Moderate: Learn about importance of peat Moderate: Consultation process if changes to management plan are proposed Moderate: Potential positive: Livelihood benefits and through improved health of ecosystems when better protected/ managed Potential negative: Even if they are not situated in peatlands, villagers may actually use peatland areas; hence, changes to the PKWS management plan might lead to access restrictions Potential beneficiary of upscaling and awareness raising activities. While the village has not been selected as a demonstration site, if the survey confirms peatland and the need for use restrictions, the villages will be involved in the participatory process of defining demarcations/ restrictions; where impacts cannot be avoided, they will need to have access to mitigation measures.
03-09-18_Project_Document.docx