and annual reports were considered as a source of conflict that caused delays and deteriorated professional relationships [p. 32, TE]. 4.4 Sustainability Rating: Moderately Likely The TE rates sustainability as This TER rates sustainability as The moderately likely. moderately likely. national government demonstrated financial commitment in the continuation. Social support project’s appears to be high as demonstrated already in behavioral change towards biodiversity-friendly producers’ approaches. CIARA expressed commitment for continuing to implement the second phase by project’s including the replication sites. However, no other possible financial sources or different institutions other than CIARA were found to support the continuity. project’s Risks to the sustainability of project outcomes is further assessed along the following 4 dimensions [p. TE]: Financial Sustainability. (Moderately Likely) The TE identifies commitment by the government to continue implementing the program with its own resources [p. 43, TE]. No other sources of revenue supporting the project were found. Sociopolitical Sustainability. (Likely) Behavioral change towards a more agro-ecological approach in producers was registered throughout the project [p. 43-44, TE]. Their new technical skills that support this approach may support a positive long-term impact. Further buttressing this type of sustainability, production of shade-grown coffee has a great sustainability potential is that it is in line with element. The project is largely supported by local beneficiaries that could farmers’ cultural be used as leverage for future endeavors. Institutional Sustainability. (Moderately Likely) for Agriculture and MPPAT (People’s Ministry Land) and commitment to continue the program into a second phase, CIARA’s Board signaled which would bring together current beneficiaries such as those in Terrandina with future beneficiaries in the original component (13 municipalities) [p. 42, TE]. However, “replication” involvement by other local offices and ministries was limited [p. 26, TE]. This lack of institutional support could work against the sustainability. project’s Environmental Sustainability. (Unable to Assess) Possible environmental risks are related to the coffee borer pest and blight that can serve as a possible backlash to non-environmental friendly practices. However, because probability of this happening is not provided.
and annual reports were considered as a source of conflict that caused delays and deteriorated professional relationships [p. 32, TE]. 4.4 Sustainability Rating: Moderately Likely The TE rates sustainability as moderately likely. This TER rates sustainability as moderately likely. The national government demonstrated financial commitment in the project’s continuation. Social support appears to be high as demonstrated already in producers’ behavioral change towards biodiversity-friendly approaches. CIARA expressed commitment for continuing to implement the project’s second phase by including the replication sites. However, no other possible financial sources or different institutions other than CIARA were found to support the project’s continuity. Risks to the sustainability of project outcomes is further assessed along the following 4 dimensions [p. TE]: Financial Sustainability. (Moderately Likely) The TE identifies commitment by the government to continue implementing the program with its own resources [p. 43, TE]. No other sources of revenue supporting the project were found. Sociopolitical Sustainability. (Likely) Behavioral change towards a more agro-ecological approach in producers was registered throughout the project [p. 43-44, TE]. Their new technical skills that support this approach may support a positive long-term impact. Further buttressing this type of sustainability, production of shade-grown coffee has a great sustainability potential is that it is in line with farmers’ cultural element. The project is largely supported by local beneficiaries that could be used as leverage for future endeavors. Institutional Sustainability. (Moderately Likely) MPPAT (People’s Ministry for Agriculture and Land) and CIARA’s Board signaled commitment to continue the program into a second phase, which would bring together current beneficiaries such as those in Terrandina with future beneficiaries in the original “replication” component (13 municipalities) [p. 42, TE]. However, involvement by other local offices and ministries was limited [p. 26, TE]. This lack of support could work against the project’s sustainability. Environmental Sustainability. (Unable to Assess) Possible environmental risks are related to the coffee borer pest and blight that can serve as a possible backlash to non-environmental friendly practices. However, because probability of this happening is not provided. institutional
2120_UNDP_GEFIEO_TER_APR%25202014_EH_JS_EH_final.docx