Park Tract, Seville, California City, and West Goshen. It also outlined general objectives for pilot projects under Track A, directed the Utilities to file pilot project proposals and authorized nonutility parties to file pilot project proposals when commenting on Utility proposals. PG&E, SCE and SoCalGas filed Track A pilot project proposals on January 31, 2018. On March 2, 2018, TURN, ORA, CforAT, the Sierra Club and Natural Resources Defense Council (Sierra Club / NRDC), GRID Alternatives and SoCalGas commented on the Utilities’ pilot proposals. The CRPE, SHE and the Leadership Counsel commented collectively, calling themselves the “Pilot Team.” A nonUtility party, GRID Alternatives, along with Proteus and Tesla, filed their own pilot project proposal concurrent with their comments on March 2, 2018. Greenlining Institute, TURN, Sierra Club / NRDC, ORA, GRID Alternatives, SoCalGas, PG&E, the Pilot Team, and the California Solar and Storage Association (CSSA) filed reply comments on the Utilities’ pilot project proposals on April 6, 2018. The Commission has not yet authorized any Track A pilot projects. The Phase II Scoping Memo indicated that Track B of this proceeding would finalize a plan to gather information necessary to evaluate economically feasible energy options for the communities listed on the SJV DAC list. It proposed a Data Gathering Framework based on previous party input to ORA’s Data Gathering Framework, requested parties to comment on additional questions in an Attachment B, and directed the Utilities to file data gathering plans. On February 28, 2018 PG&E, SCE and SCG filed proposed plans. On March 28, 2018 TURN, GRID Alternatives, ORA, Sierra Club/ NRDC, the Pilot Team, Greenlining Institute, CforAT and PG&E commented on the Utilities’ proposed Plans. On April 13, 2018, PG&E and ORA provided reply comments on the proposed Plans.
Park Tract, Seville, California City, and West Goshen. It also outlined general objectives for pilot projects under Track A, directed the Utilities to file pilot project proposals and authorized nonutility parties to file pilot project proposals when commenting on Utility proposals. PG&E, SCE and SoCalGas filed Track A pilot project proposals on January 31, 2018. On March 2, 2018, TURN, ORA, CforAT, the Sierra Club and Natural Resources Defense Council (Sierra Club / NRDC), GRID Alternatives and SoCalGas commented on the Utilities’ pilot proposals. The CRPE, SHE and the Leadership Counsel commented collectively, calling themselves the “Pilot Team.” A nonUtility party, GRID Alternatives, along with Proteus and Tesla, filed their own pilot project proposal concurrent with their comments on March 2, 2018. Greenlining Institute, TURN, Sierra Club / NRDC, ORA, GRID Alternatives, SoCalGas, PG&E, the Pilot Team, and the California Solar and Storage Association (CSSA) filed reply comments on the Utilities’ pilot project proposals on April 6, 2018. The Commission has not yet authorized any Track A pilot projects. The Phase II Scoping Memo indicated that Track B of this proceeding would finalize a plan to gather information necessary to evaluate economically feasible energy options for the communities listed on the SJV DAC list. It proposed a Data Gathering Framework based on previous party input to ORA’s Data Gathering Framework, requested parties to comment on additional questions in an Attachment B, and directed the Utilities to file data gathering plans. On February 28, 2018 PG&E, SCE and SCG filed proposed plans. On March 28, 2018 TURN, GRID Alternatives, ORA, Sierra Club/ NRDC, the Pilot Team, Greenlining Institute, CforAT and PG&E commented on the Utilities’ proposed Plans. On April 13, 2018, PG&E and ORA provided reply comments on the proposed Plans.
223843058.docx