of an Additional Achievable Energy Efficiency (AAEE) forecast consistent with SB 350. Club questions the extent to which electrical demand of SDG&E’s customers exceeds SDG&E’s import capability for electricity. This translates to how many customers would lose electric service without gasfired electric generation in San Diego. Sierra Club opines that California’s decarbonization laws are the reason that Line 3602 is not needed. SCGC is sympathetic to Sierra Club’s point of view and suggests that the Commission take official notice of recent updated forecasts such as the most recent IEPR report. POC endorses Sierra Club’s detailed, fact based determination that California’s decarbonization efforts are a reason that this project is not needed and why Line 3602 will become a stranded asset if it is built. “Missing” Rule 3.1 Information Based on a Joint Commissioner/ALJ ruling dated January 22, 2016, the original Application was deemed deficient because the Applicants failed to comply with basic provisions of Rule 3.1 pertaining to CPCN “Construction or Extension of Facilities Requirements,” which require Applicants to provide the following basic information. This information would augment information provided by actual historical and forecasted demands based on actual numbers and/or other factors: Tenyear forecasted (maximum daily and annual daily average daily) volumes in the area to be served by the proposed Line; including information of the quality of gas and broken down by customer type (e.g. core, noncore commercial and industrial, and noncore electric generation; Tenyear historic monthly volumes through Line 1600; and Tenyear historic daily and annual maximum volumes through Line 1600.
of an Additional Achievable Energy Efficiency (AAEE) forecast consistent with SB 350. Club questions the extent to which electrical demand of SDG&E’s customers exceeds SDG&E’s import capability for electricity. This translates to how many customers would lose electric service without gasfired electric generation in San Diego. Sierra Club opines that California’s decarbonization laws are the reason that Line 3602 is not needed. SCGC is sympathetic to Sierra Club’s point of view and suggests that the Commission take official notice of recent updated forecasts such as the most recent IEPR report. POC endorses Sierra Club’s detailed, fact based determination that California’s decarbonization efforts are a reason that this project is not needed and why Line 3602 will become a stranded asset if it is built. “Missing” Rule 3.1 Information Based on a Joint Commissioner/ALJ ruling dated January 22, 2016, the original Application was deemed deficient because the Applicants failed to comply with basic provisions of Rule 3.1 pertaining to CPCN “Construction or Extension of Facilities Requirements,” which require Applicants to provide the following basic information. This information would augment information provided by actual historical and forecasted demands based on actual numbers and/or other factors: Tenyear forecasted (maximum daily and annual daily average daily) volumes in the area to be served by the proposed Line; including information of the quality of gas and broken down by customer type (e.g. core, noncore commercial and industrial, and noncore electric generation; Tenyear historic monthly volumes through Line 1600; and Tenyear historic daily and annual maximum volumes through Line 1600.
216389464.docx