Investee Increased i) Amounts co-invested in investee and i) External factors Annual id. amounts of ii) Amount and # of investee funds and broader introducing IM; affecting reporting to attracting funding being industry receiving follow-on capital greater investee of financing SAG and FAS additional capital made available to levels of funds ii) Poor performance of design SMEs at interest investment portfolios n/a from iii) Failure to effectively stage disseminate learnings and Unknown investors? Increased i) # of SME funds adopting impact management How i) Absence of proven Annual id. Broader adoption of gender lens adherence and and/or gender lens investing approaches effective is IM impact and benefits reporting to investing and improved ii) Use of tools and guidelines in EMIIF in from EMIIF and similar SAG and FAS impact adoption of the wider industry facilitating initiatives design management in relevant factors at a mindset ii) Lack f support and n/a the impact within impact shift within buy-in from impact stage investing market investment the investors broader Unknown market? Investment-based Entrenchment of i) Overall support offered for relevant activities How well i) Lack of support and Annual id. approach broadly investment-based ii) # of initiatives adopting an investment-based can an engagement by reporting to adopted as approach within approach, and amount of funding committed DFAT departments SAG and FAS complementary DFAT as an thereto ii) Information approach in DFAT organisation approach provided not effective n/a be in creating interest Limited integrated iii) Inherent within underperformance of DFAT? EMIIF Industry-wide Broader i) # of new organisations undertaking similar How i) Lack of support and Annual id. recognition of recognition of initiatives, potentially informed directly by EMIIF effective is engagement by other reporting to benefits of relevant approach ii) # of initiatives seeking to collaborate with EMIIF in DFAT departments SAG and FAS design within overall EMIIF influencing ii) Information at collaboration landscape industry provided not effective n/a thinking? in creating interest iii) Underperformance Unknown of EMIIF
and introducing greater levels of interest from and investors? Investee attracting additional capital Increased amounts of funding being made available to SMEs i) Amounts co-invested in investee ii) Amount and # of investee funds and broader industry receiving follow-on capital Unknown at design stage IM; investee funds i) External factors affecting of financing ii) Poor performance of investment portfolios iii) Failure to effectively disseminate learnings n/a Annual reporting to SAG and FAS id. Broader adoption of gender lens investing and impact management in the impact investing market Increased adherence and improved adoption of relevant factors within impact investment i) # of SME funds adopting impact management and/or gender lens investing approaches ii) Use of tools and guidelines in the wider industry Unknown at design stage How effective is EMIIF in facilitating a mindset shift within the broader market? IM i) Absence of proven impact and benefits from EMIIF and similar initiatives ii) Lack f support and buy-in from impact investors n/a Annual reporting to SAG and FAS id. Investment-based approach broadly adopted as complementary approach in DFAT Entrenchment of investment-based approach within DFAT as an organisation i) Overall support offered for relevant activities ii) # of initiatives adopting an investment-based approach, and amount of funding committed thereto Limited How well can an approach be integrated within DFAT? i) Lack of support and engagement by DFAT departments ii) Information provided not effective in creating interest iii) Inherent underperformance of EMIIF n/a Annual reporting to SAG and FAS id. Industry-wide recognition of benefits of collaboration Broader recognition of relevant approach within overall landscape i) # of new organisations undertaking similar initiatives, potentially informed directly by EMIIF ii) # of initiatives seeking to collaborate with EMIIF Unknown at design How effective is EMIIF in influencing industry thinking? i) Lack of support and engagement by other DFAT departments ii) Information provided not effective in creating interest iii) Underperformance of EMIIF n/a Annual reporting to SAG and FAS id.
emiif-draft-design-for-likely-procurement-october-2017.docx