Reading Goals Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement Based on the analysis of student achievement data and Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Process Used to Determine Evaluation Tool reference to Questions,” identify and define Responsible for Monitoring Effectiveness of Strategy “Guiding areas in need of improvement for the following group: 1A. FCAT 2.0: Students scoring at 1A.1. 1A.1. 1A.1. 1A.1. 1A.1. FCIM will be implemented to Principal; Assistant Principal Classroom Walk Throughs CWT data; PLC meeting Achievement Level 3 in reading. ensure that the steps of Plan, Do, (CWT); Professional Learning agendas; Benchmark Check, Act are in place and being Community meetings; Lesson Assessments Reading Goal #1A: 2012 Current 2013 Expected utilized through mini-assessments of of and data meetings. Performance:* Performance:* By 2013, 50% of The results students will achieve For the 2013 of the 2012 a level 3 or above school year, FCAT on the FCAT reading we would Reading Test assessment. like to see indicate that 50% of our we had 59 students (17%) score an students in achievement grades 3-6 level of level who scored 3 in reading. a level 3 on the FCAT 2.0 Reading. 1A.2. 1A.2. 1A.2. 1A.2. 1A.2. 1A.3. 1A.3. 1A.3. 1A.3. 1A.3. 1B. Florida Alternate Assessment: Students 1B.1. 1B.1. 1B.1. 1B.1. 1B.1. scoring at Levels 4, 5, and 6 in reading. Reading Goal #1B: 2012 Current 2013 Expected Level of Level of Performance:* Performance:* By 2013, 50% of The results Our goal for students will achieve of the 2012 the 2013 a 4-6 FAA Reading FAA Reading on the FAA reading Test indicate Test is that assessment. that we had we will have 3 (26%) 50% of our students in students in grades 3-6 grades 3-6 who scored scoring a a level 4-6 6 on the FAA Reading
Reading Goals Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement Based on the analysis of student achievement data and reference to “Guiding Questions,” identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following group: Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 1A. FCAT 2.0: Students scoring at Achievement Level 3 in reading. 1A.1. 1A.1. FCIM will be implemented to ensure that the steps of Plan, Do, Check, Act are in place and being utilized through mini-assessments and data meetings. 1A.1. Principal; Assistant Principal 1A.1. Classroom Walk Throughs (CWT); Professional Learning Community meetings; Lesson 1A.1. CWT data; PLC meeting agendas; Benchmark Assessments Reading Goal #1A: By 2013, 50% of students will achieve a level 3 or above on the FCAT reading assessment. 2012 Current of Performance:* 2013 Expected of Performance:* The results of the 2012 FCAT Reading Test indicate that we had 59 (17%) students in grades 3-6 who scored a level 3 on the FCAT 2.0 Reading. For the 2013 school year, we would like to see 50% of our students score an achievement level of level 3 in reading. 1A.2. 1A.2. 1A.2. 1A.2. 1A.2. 1A.3. 1A.3. 1A.3. 1A.3. 1A.3. 1B. Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at Levels 4, 5, and 6 in reading. 1B.1. 1B.1. 1B.1. 1B.1. 1B.1. Reading Goal #1B: By 2013, 50% of students will achieve a 4-6 on the FAA reading assessment. 2012 Current Level of Performance:* 2013 Expected Level of Performance:* The results of the 2012 FAA Reading Test indicate that we had 3 (26%) students in grades 3-6 who scored a level 4-6 Our goal for the 2013 FAA Reading Test is that we will have 50% of our students in grades 3-6 scoring a on the FAA Reading 6
Endeavour%20Elementary.docx