Objectively verifiable indicators Sources of Risks and Assumptions verification Project Strategy Indicator Baseline value Target value and date Outcome 1: The Rio Conventions are more effectively implemented through national planning frameworks that are supported by best practice tools and institutional arrangements Output 1.1 Review of NBSAP, Rio Convention tools and Review of tools & Analytic matrix Analyses are deemed NAP, NAPA, SNAP mechanisms exist mechanisms, and definitions and reports legitimate, relevant, and Effective tools and tools & mechanisms however monitoring & of tools completed by valid among all key mechanisms for Training completed by month 6 reporting not streamlined month 6 stakeholder representatives implementing Rio &Workshop across the Focal Points Conventions Specific definitions Training and workshop reports Sector agencies remain and implementing for each tool learning outcomes shows at committed to undertaking an agencies Learning outcomes developed and least 50% improvement in integrated approach to pre & post- training specific components Weak inter-linkages awareness of Rio monitoring and reporting questionnaires requiring between three Rio Convention Focal Points strengthening to Convention reporting and stakeholders on how to Sector agency support Rio obligations implement consolidated reports and work Convention monitoring programme for plans Non-existent consolidated obligations completed Rio Convention environmental monitoring Pre & Post by month 6 implementation, monitoring programme questionnaires and reporting by month 11 At least 3 workshop Steering committees and conducted on gaps Consolidated environmental TWG exist however and weaknesses of monitoring programme (M strategic approach to tools and mechanisms & E components) integrated implementation of Rio into relevant sector agency At least two (2) Conventions very weak work programmes by month workshops conducted 14 on the design and development (and validation) of the consolidated environmental monitoring programme Operational multi-agency monitoring programme (M & E components) designed and trialed through
Project Strategy Objectively verifiable indicators Sources of verification Risks and Assumptions Indicator Baseline value Target value and date Outcome 1: The Rio Conventions are more effectively implemented through national planning frameworks that are supported by best practice tools and institutional arrangements Output 1.1 Effective tools and mechanisms for implementing Rio Conventions Review of NBSAP, NAP, NAPA, SNAP tools & mechanisms completed by month 6 Specific definitions for each tool developed and specific components requiring strengthening to support Rio Convention obligations completed by month 6 At least 3 workshop conducted on gaps and weaknesses of tools and mechanisms At least two (2) workshops conducted on the design and development (and validation) of the consolidated environmental monitoring programme Operational multi-agency monitoring programme (M & E components) designed and trialed through Rio Convention tools and mechanisms exist however monitoring & reporting not streamlined across the Focal Points and implementing agencies Weak inter-linkages between three Rio Convention reporting obligations Non-existent consolidated environmental monitoring programme Steering committees and TWG exist however strategic approach to implementation of Rio Conventions very weak Review of tools & mechanisms, and definitions of tools completed by month 6 Training and workshop learning outcomes shows at least 50% improvement in awareness of Rio Convention Focal Points and stakeholders on how to implement consolidated monitoring programme for Rio Convention implementation, monitoring and reporting by month 11 Consolidated environmental monitoring programme (M & E components) integrated into relevant sector agency work programmes by month 14 Analytic matrix and reports Training &Workshop reports Learning outcomes pre & post- training questionnaires Sector agency reports and work plans Pre & Post questionnaires Analyses are deemed legitimate, relevant, and valid among all key stakeholder representatives Sector agencies remain committed to undertaking an integrated approach to monitoring and reporting
5-15-14_Samao_5164_CD_UNDP_Project_Doc.docx