Should consider: convicted of a family violence offence, has a restraining order against them for violence. Proposal 5–8 Yes. Very important to list and give clear examples. Also consider adding: cannot act as executor of the will on the basis of the EPA in the event of the detah ofthe principal. Sometimes not well understood by service providers or by family members. Proposal 5–9 Yes. The Asset Management research clearly showed a range of risky practices including poor record keeping, mingling finances, poor arrangements re granny flats. An issue to be considered here is that record keeping should not be so onerous that family members refuse to be financial attorneys and responsibilities default to the state. Our rearch showed that there are few support services available to assist nominated atttorneys to do a good job and keep adequate records. Proposal 5–10 Yes. Good policy but has a long history of limited action. How to engage the states in this is a key consideration. Proposal 5–11 Will this add to the complexity of trying to get nationally consistent legislation? Proposal 5–12 Yes. Our research (LPITAF) suggests that case examples are important in fostering understanding of responsibilities. Proposal 5–13 Yes. They need to understand what this means in particular circumstances. Proposal 6–1 Yes. They also need to know before or at the time the argeement is signed to indicate that they understand the role, are willing to do it and will comply with the legislation. We have some evidence of attornies being nominated in their absence and being unaware of appointment. A problem noted in our research is that there are few services available to help attorneys who are unsure of their roles and responsiblities or how to enact them properly in the face of family conflict and undue influence of others. Question 6–1
Should consider: convicted of a family violence offence, has a restraining order against them for violence. Proposal 5–8 Yes. Very important to list and give clear examples. Also consider adding: cannot act as executor of the will on the basis of the EPA in the event of the detah ofthe principal. Sometimes not well understood by service providers or by family members. Proposal 5–9 Yes. The Asset Management research clearly showed a range of risky practices including poor record keeping, mingling finances, poor arrangements re granny flats. An issue to be considered here is that record keeping should not be so onerous that family members refuse to be financial attorneys and responsibilities default to the state. Our rearch showed that there are few support services available to assist nominated atttorneys to do a good job and keep adequate records. Proposal 5–10 Yes. Good policy but has a long history of limited action. How to engage the states in this is a key consideration. Proposal 5–11 Will this add to the complexity of trying to get nationally consistent legislation? Proposal 5–12 Yes. Our research (LPITAF) suggests that case examples are important in fostering understanding of responsibilities. Proposal 5–13 Yes. They need to understand what this means in particular circumstances. Proposal 6–1 Yes. They also need to know before or at the time the argeement is signed to indicate that they understand the role, are willing to do it and will comply with the legislation. We have some evidence of attornies being nominated in their absence and being unaware of appointment. A problem noted in our research is that there are few services available to help attorneys who are unsure of their roles and responsiblities or how to enact them properly in the face of family conflict and undue influence of others. Question 6–1
243._assets_ageing_and_intergenerational_transfers_research_prorgam_the_university_of_queensland_form_.docx