According to the matrix results, Cards number During the interview session, the first respondent P6 and P9 had equal percentages, meaning there who sorted P6 into Level 3 mentioned that: was no majority grouping. Card number P6 is: card should be sorted into Level 3 because “This of IT product that is upgradable, the card pertains to the practice of green IT “P6: Purchase reusable, recyclable and procurement by purchasing an IT product that can reducible.” be upgradable, which is in line with the reusable…. The result of card number P6 is; one respondent definition of Level 3.” sorted into Level 3, another respondent sorted into Level 4 and the last person sorted into Level 5. FIGURE 6: Matrix table of green IT procurement The respondent who sorted the card into Level 4 card is addressing the practice of green IT “This mentioned: procurement and that will be for future card should be placed in level 4 because it improvement, so it should be in Level “This 5.” indicates that there is a structural practice to apply From the result of the interviews, P6 should be green practice and execute it for future sorted into Level 3 as agreed to by both respondent improvement.” one and two. When researcher asked the second respondent to The result of P9 is one respondent sorted it into sort this card into another level, he remarked: Level 2, another respondent into Level 4, and the the concept of this card reflects the “As last into Level 5. Card P9: performance and the future improvement, this card use of multiple green criteria to select and can be sorted into Level “P9: 3.” evaluate IT products for advance green The last respondent who sorted the card into procurement” Level 5 mentioned:
According to the matrix results, Cards number P6 and P9 had equal percentages, meaning there was no majority grouping. Card number P6 is: “P6: Purchase of IT product that is upgradable, reusable, recyclable and reducible.” The result of card number P6 is; one respondent sorted into Level 3, another respondent sorted into Level 4 and the last person sorted into Level 5. During the interview session, the first respondent who sorted P6 into Level 3 mentioned that: “This card should be sorted into Level 3 because the card pertains to the practice of green IT procurement by purchasing an IT product that can be upgradable, reusable…. which is in line with the definition of Level 3.” FIGURE 6: Matrix table of green IT procurement The respondent who sorted the card into Level 4 mentioned: “This card should be placed in level 4 because it indicates that there is a structural practice to apply green practice and execute it for future improvement.” When researcher asked the second respondent to sort this card into another level, he remarked: “As the concept of this card reflects the performance and the future improvement, this card can be sorted into Level 3.” The last respondent who sorted the card into Level 5 mentioned: “This card is addressing the practice of green IT procurement and that will be for future improvement, so it should be in Level 5.” From the result of the interviews, P6 should be sorted into Level 3 as agreed to by both respondent one and two. The result of P9 is one respondent sorted it into Level 2, another respondent into Level 4, and the last into Level 5. Card P9: “P9: use of multiple green criteria to select and evaluate IT products for advance green procurement”
321385331741455395_framework_for_capability_maturity.docx