Describe Basis for Conclusion: 22. In regard to (DOB), do reviewed activity files document: duplication of benefits All sources of assistance provided to each applicant for the same purpose, and the determination of DOB? [Stafford Act, notice published November 16, 2011 (76 Federal Register FR 71066)] b. How the DOB determination impacted the CDBG-DR applicant’s award? If a DOB was found, was there a reduction in the award amount? [Stafford Act, notice published November 16, 2011 (76 Federal Register FR 71066)] c. That each applicant has entered into a signed agreement (e.g., subrogation agreement) to repay subsequent duplicative assistance? [See notice published November 16, 2011 (76 FR Federal Register 71066), as may be amended or incorporated into a Federal Register notice, for applicability] d. How the grantee implemented HUD guidance when assisting applicants that declined SBA assistance? NOTE: This guidance is only applicable to applications processed by the grantee following the effective date of the guidance document (July 25, 2013). [Refer to Questions 9.a-c. See HUD Guidance on Duplication of Benefit Requirements and Provision of CDBG Disaster Recovery Assistance, published July 25, 2013, as may be amended.] If a DOB occurred after assistance was awarded, were funds recaptured in accordance with the agreement and the policies and grantee’s procedures? [Refer to Question 10; see notice published November Federal Register 16, 2011 (76 FR 71066) for applicability] Describe Basis for Conclusion: 23. In regard to additional requirements, as applicable, do reviewed activity files document: Compliance with requirements on rehabilitation and reconstruction policies and procedures? activities [Refer to Questions 12.a-b.]
Describe Basis for Conclusion: 22. In regard to duplication of benefits (DOB), do reviewed activity files document: All sources of assistance provided to each applicant for the same purpose, and the determination of DOB? [Stafford Act, Federal Register notice published November 16, 2011 (76 FR 71066)] b. How the DOB determination impacted the applicant’s CDBG-DR award? If a DOB was found, was there a reduction in the award amount? [Stafford Act, Federal Register notice published November 16, 2011 (76 FR 71066)] c. That each applicant has entered into a signed agreement (e.g., subrogation agreement) to repay subsequent duplicative assistance? [See Federal Register notice published November 16, 2011 (76 FR 71066), as may be amended or incorporated into a Federal Register notice, for applicability] d. How the grantee implemented HUD guidance when assisting applicants that declined SBA assistance? NOTE: This guidance is only applicable to applications processed by the grantee following the effective date of the guidance document (July 25, 2013). [Refer to Questions 9.a-c. See HUD Guidance on Duplication of Benefit Requirements and Provision of CDBG Disaster Recovery Assistance, published July 25, 2013, as may be amended.] If a DOB occurred after assistance was awarded, were funds recaptured in accordance with the agreement and the grantee’s policies and procedures? [Refer to Question 10; see Federal Register notice published November 16, 2011 (76 FR 71066) for applicability] Describe Basis for Conclusion: 23. In regard to additional requirements, as applicable, do reviewed activity files document: Compliance with requirements on rehabilitation and reconstruction activities policies and procedures? [Refer to Questions 12.a-b.]
65092X6-6CPDH.DOCX