Student Student record review and an Review a sample of student Submit a description record review interview indicated that records across all grade levels of the root cause PI although the district provided for IEP Teams convened analysis with the the parent with two copies of between January and April of results, as well as Interview SE 18B the proposed IEP and the 2012-2013 school year, to specific proposal(s) Determination of proposed placement, along determine why two copies of for remedying the placement; with the required notice, it did the proposed IEP and proposed non-compliance and provision of IEP not always provide the placement, along with the associated timelines, to parent documents immediately required notice, are not always by November 1, following the development of provided immediately 2013 the IEP. following the development of the IEP. Submit a description of the internal oversight and tracking system with Develop an internal oversight periodic reviews, and tracking system to ensure along with the name that the documents are sent and role of the immediately following the designated persons, development of the IEP. The by November 1, tracking system should include 2013. supervisory oversight and periodic reviews by a designated person, to ensure Submit the results of ongoing compliance. a second record review and include the number of Conduct a second review of all records reviewed; IEPs issued, after all corrective the number in actions were completed, to compliance with this determine if copies of the IEP criterion; the root and placement were provided
SE 18B Determination of placement; provision of IEP to parent PI Student record review Interview Student record review and an interview indicated that although the district provided the parent with two copies of the proposed IEP and proposed placement, along with the required notice, it did not always provide the documents immediately following the development of the IEP. Review a sample of student records across all grade levels for IEP Teams convened between January and April of the 2012-2013 school year, to determine why two copies of the proposed IEP and proposed placement, along with the required notice, are not always provided immediately following the development of the IEP. Develop an internal oversight and tracking system to ensure that the documents are sent immediately following the development of the IEP. The tracking system should include supervisory oversight and periodic reviews by a designated person, to ensure ongoing compliance. Conduct a second review of all IEPs issued, after all corrective actions were completed, to determine if copies of the IEP and placement were provided Submit a description of the root cause analysis with the results, as well as specific proposal(s) for remedying the non-compliance and associated timelines, by November 1, 2013 Submit a description of the internal oversight and tracking system with periodic reviews, along with the name and role of the designated persons, by November 1, 2013. Submit the results of a second record review and include the number of records reviewed; the number in compliance with this criterion; the root
0227.docx