Percentage of STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES scoring proficient or above on Algebra I 63% 8% 2.7% 0 Math Assessment Elements 6 Total Part B Compliance Matrix (2015-2016 School Year) The table below consists of data from the State Performance Plan’s Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR). Each item is an indicator of how the State is performing on key aspects of educating students with disabilities as prescribed by the IDEA. The indicators are set by the United States Department of Education’s Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). The State Targets were determined by OSEP requirements, a review of State data over time, and input from the Special Education Advisory Panel. The indicators included below are compliance indicators. Compliance Matrix Scoring Total Number of Compliance Points Total Number of Compliance Points Percentage Earned Available Earned 14 14 100.00% State District Target Compliance Indicators Score Target Performance Met 4A District has a significant discrepancy in the rate of suspensions/expulsions No No Yes 2 greater than 10 days for STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (Special Education rate no more than 2% above regular education rate) 4B District has a significant discrepancy by race or ethnicity in the rate of No No Yes 2 suspensions/expulsions greater than 10 days for children with IEPs 9 Disproportionate Representation in Special Education No No Yes 2 10 Disproportionate Representation in Specific Disability Categories No No Yes 2 11 Child Find – Percent of children determined eligible within 60 days 100% 100% Yes 2 12 Part C to B Transition – Percent of children with IEP by 3rd birthday (Timely 100% 100% Yes 2 evaluations to ensure students being served in Part C First Steps have an IEP on or before their 3rd birthday) 13 Secondary Transition with IEP Goals – Percent of youth age 16+ with IEP with 100% 100% Yes 2 measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services Total Points Earned 14 State Results Elements (2015-2016 School Year) The table below contains district data that indicates how students with and without disabilities are performing on metrics that are predictors of student success. These elements are for reporting purposes only and not scored. General Results Elements State District Performance Performance
Percentage of STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES scoring proficient or above on Algebra I 63% 8% 2.7% 0 Math Assessment Elements Total 6 Part B Compliance Matrix (2015-2016 School Year) The table below consists of data from the State Performance Plan’s Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR). Each item is an indicator of how the State is performing on key aspects of educating students with disabilities as prescribed by the IDEA. The indicators are set by the United States Department of Education’s Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). The State Targets were determined by OSEP requirements, a review of State data over time, and input from the Special Education Advisory Panel. The indicators included below are compliance indicators. Compliance Matrix Scoring Total Number of Compliance Points Available Total Number of Compliance Points Earned Percentage Earned 14 14 100.00% Compliance Indicators State Target District Performance Target Met Score 4A District has a significant discrepancy in the rate of suspensions/expulsions greater than 10 days for STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (Special Education rate no more than 2% above regular education rate) No No Yes 2 4B District has a significant discrepancy by race or ethnicity in the rate of suspensions/expulsions greater than 10 days for children with IEPs No No Yes 2 9 Disproportionate Representation in Special Education No No Yes 2 10 Disproportionate Representation in Specific Disability Categories No No Yes 2 11 Child Find – Percent of children determined eligible within 60 days 100% 100% Yes 2 12 Part C to B Transition – Percent of children with IEP by 3rd birthday (Timely evaluations to ensure students being served in Part C First Steps have an IEP on or before their 3rd birthday) 100% 100% Yes 2 13 Secondary Transition with IEP Goals – Percent of youth age 16+ with IEP with measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services 100% 100% Yes 2 Total Points Earned 14 State Results Elements (2015-2016 School Year) The table below contains district data that indicates how students with and without disabilities are performing on metrics that are predictors of student success. These elements are for reporting purposes only and not scored. General Results Elements State Performance District Performance
5711%20-%20Sped%20Report%20Card.docx