Demonstrated Positive financial i) No. of investee with Can the Secretariat; i) Ineffective training not Annual id. and impact benefits improved investment benefits of IM; investee allowing for effective adoption reporting to financial and evidenced through processes adopting funds ii) Poor implementation by SAG and FAS development design benefits of relevant metrics ii) No. of investee funds approaches underlying businesses at impact and reporting with improved risk be proven? n/a stage management management strategies, and gender lens incl. social, cultural and Unknown investing environmental factors Increased Increased size and i) # of additional initiatives Can EMIIF Secretariat i) Lack of support from country Annual id. scale of EMIIF launched through EMIIF successfully reporting to funding flows through EMIIF ii) Size of additional attract and ii) Insufficient effort devoted by SAG and FAS funding committed deploy Secretariat n/a Zero through EMIIF funding from iii) Underperformance of EMIIF other fund Divisions? Information and Integration of Qualitative reporting on How best can Secretariat i) Lack of support and Annual id. learnings and broader dissemination of EMIIF engagement by other DFAT reporting to insights are integrated to insights into all information and support departments SAG and FAS inform all DFAT DFAT activities integration of learnings DFAT’s ii) Information provided not n/a Zero activities broader effective in creating learnings PSD/PSE objectives? Figure 54: Illustrative monitoring and evaluation framework for theory of change Long-term outcomes – Program logic 1.Desired result 2.Two-three Performance indicators 6.Risks 8.Reporting 9.Use questions of parties 7.Target
Demonstrated financial and development benefits of impact management and gender lens investing Positive financial and impact benefits evidenced through relevant metrics and reporting i) No. of investee with improved investment processes ii) No. of investee funds with improved risk management strategies, incl. social, cultural and environmental factors Unknown at design stage Can the benefits of adopting approaches be proven? Secretariat; IM; investee funds i) Ineffective training not allowing for effective adoption ii) Poor implementation by underlying businesses n/a Annual reporting to SAG and FAS id. Increased funding flows through EMIIF Increased size and scale of EMIIF i) # of additional initiatives launched through EMIIF ii) Size of additional funding committed through EMIIF Zero Can EMIIF successfully attract and deploy funding from other Divisions? Secretariat i) Lack of support from country ii) Insufficient effort devoted by Secretariat iii) Underperformance of EMIIF fund n/a Annual reporting to SAG and FAS id. Information and insights are integrated to inform all DFAT activities Integration of learnings and insights into all DFAT activities Qualitative reporting on broader dissemination of information and integration of learnings Zero How best can EMIIF support DFAT’s broader PSD/PSE objectives? Secretariat i) Lack of support and engagement by other DFAT departments ii) Information provided not effective in creating learnings n/a Annual reporting to SAG and FAS id. Figure 54: Illustrative monitoring and evaluation framework for theory of change – Long-term outcomes Program logic 1.Desired result 2.Two-three Performance indicators questions of parties 6.Risks 7.Target 8.Reporting 9.Use
emiif-draft-design-for-likely-procurement-october-2017.docx