Assumptions: Reserve Management The TFS will not have to Number of active Reserve Plans villages and Management Plans in the six 0 (4 outdated) 6 FNR quarterly/annual communities in the gazetting of targeted FNRs reports the proposed FNRs Project reports The TFS appoints sufficient and suitable management staff to administer and manage the new Extent (km) of boundaries FNRs adequately demarcated and FNR quarterly/annual Competent local civil ~210km 661km routinely maintained in the six reports engineering businesses are targeted FNRs Project reports available to implement construction and renovation activities in far-flung FNRs Number of the targeted FNRs FNR quarterly/annual Boundary demarcation and with all entry points adequately 0 6 reports infrastructure works do not signposted and secured Project reports compromise the ecological integrity of the FNRs Local village government will Number of ranger staff in the six FNR quarterly/annual act in the best interests of local targeted FNRs who are 0 60 reports communities i.r.o. benefits adequately equipped Project reports derived from FNRs and project activities Number of the targeted FNRs Risks: with functional basic transport Local communities living in and and infrastructure (i.e. minimum FNR quarterly/annual around the reserves conflict with of 2 operational vehicles, 4 2 (but not fully functional) 6 reports TFS over restrictions on their operational motorbikes, one Project reports access to, and use of, land and administrative office and 3 natural resources in FNRs. This functional ranger outposts). conflict in turn leads to a significant increase in the illegal clearance of, and unsustainable FNR quarterly/annual Extent (km) of footpaths and Roads: ~17km Roads: 158km levels of harvesting of natural reports roads in the six targeted FNRs Footpaths: ~34km Footpaths: 230km resources from, FNRs by these Project reports under routine maintenance
Number of active Reserve Management Plans in the six targeted FNRs 0 (4 outdated) 6 Reserve Management Plans FNR quarterly/annual reports Project reports Assumptions: The TFS will not have to villages and communities in the gazetting of the proposed FNRs The TFS appoints sufficient and suitable management staff to administer and manage the new FNRs Competent local civil engineering businesses are available to implement construction and renovation activities in far-flung FNRs Boundary demarcation and infrastructure works do not compromise the ecological integrity of the FNRs Local village government will act in the best interests of local communities i.r.o. benefits derived from FNRs and project activities Risks: Local communities living in and around the reserves conflict with TFS over restrictions on their access to, and use of, land and natural resources in FNRs. This conflict in turn leads to a significant increase in the illegal clearance of, and unsustainable levels of harvesting of natural resources from, FNRs by these Extent (km) of boundaries adequately demarcated and routinely maintained in the six targeted FNRs ~210km 661km FNR quarterly/annual reports Project reports Number of the targeted FNRs with all entry points adequately signposted and secured 0 6 FNR quarterly/annual reports Project reports Number of ranger staff in the six targeted FNRs who are adequately equipped 0 60 FNR quarterly/annual reports Project reports Number of the targeted FNRs with functional basic transport and infrastructure (i.e. minimum of 2 operational vehicles, 4 operational motorbikes, one administrative office and 3 functional ranger outposts). 2 (but not fully functional) 6 FNR quarterly/annual reports Project reports Extent (km) of footpaths and roads in the six targeted FNRs under routine maintenance Roads: ~17km Footpaths: ~34km Roads: 158km Footpaths: 230km FNR quarterly/annual reports Project reports
05-19-14_PIMS_5106_Tanzania_FNRs-ProDoc_FOR_SUBMISSION_16-05-2014_Revised_0.docx