more disciplines or professions involved in providing early intervention services divided by the total number of records reviewed statewide in completing the self-assessment. Onsite Verification: State pulls information from data base on number of contacts documented and compares with contact log documentation in the child’s record. In addition, the State randomly selects records (including some records that the program reviewed for the and uses file review checklist to confirm accuracy of data entry (e.g., compares self-assessment results with child records reviewed during on-site monitoring). Qualified Personnel X X 3. Percent of personnel who are Percent of personnel hired who meet state standards. (State Data (SEED hired and trained according to AK Base) Registry) This indicator helps determine whether or not the agency complies with personnel standards including: requirements related to hiring and recruiting personnel. A. personnel hired who meet state standards; and Measurement: B. personnel hired who are Programs report all staff hired to the state, including job descriptions oriented on program mission, and resumes and enter data into data base. State staff review data base procedures and practices monthly for trends and on an annual basis use the data and required (e.g., teaming, IFSP process, state reports for monitoring purposes. service provision, procedural safeguards and Program: documentation). Percent = # of staff hired who meet state standards divided by all EI/ILP staff in the program. State compiles data across all programs to determine statewide performance. Statewide: Percent = # of staff hired who meet state standards divided all EI/ILP staff in the state. Onsite Verification: State staff has data base report on personnel and compares with onsite
more disciplines or professions involved in providing early intervention services divided by the total number of records reviewed statewide in completing the self-assessment. Onsite Verification: State pulls information from data base on number of contacts documented and compares with contact log documentation in the child’s record. In addition, the State randomly selects records (including some records that the program reviewed for the and uses file review checklist to confirm accuracy of data entry (e.g., compares self-assessment results with child records reviewed during on-site monitoring). Qualified Personnel 3. Percent of personnel who are hired and trained according to AK personnel standards including: A. personnel hired who meet state standards; and B. personnel hired who are oriented on program mission, procedures and practices (e.g., teaming, IFSP process, service provision, procedural safeguards and documentation). X (State Data Base) X (SEED Registry) Percent of personnel hired who meet state standards. This indicator helps determine whether or not the agency complies with requirements related to hiring and recruiting personnel. Measurement: Programs report all staff hired to the state, including job descriptions and resumes and enter data into data base. State staff review data base monthly for trends and on an annual basis use the data and required state reports for monitoring purposes. Program: Percent = # of staff hired who meet state standards divided by all EI/ILP staff in the program. State compiles data across all programs to determine statewide performance. Statewide: Percent = # of staff hired who meet state standards divided all EI/ILP staff in the state. Onsite Verification: State staff has data base report on personnel and compares with onsite
4-AK_MonitoringIndicatorsMay2012Final.docx