(4) The means by which authorisation or permission as required by section 254(1)(b)(ii) may be established include— (a) proving that an officer of the body corporate gave that authorisation or permission; or (b) proving that the body corporate's board of directors gave that authorisation or permission; or (c) proving that a corporate culture existed within the body corporate that directed, encouraged, tolerated or led to the relevant conduct being carried out. (5) Subsection (4)(a) does not apply if the body corporate proves that it exercised due diligence to prevent the authorisation or permission being given. (6) Factors relevant to the application of subsection (1)(c)(iii) or (4)(c) include— (a) whether authority to commit an offence against section 254 or an offence of a similar character had been given by an officer of the body corporate; and (b) whether the associate of the body corporate who carried out the relevant conduct or formed the relevant intention believed on reasonable grounds, or entertained a reasonable expectation, that an officer of the body corporate would have authorised or permitted the relevant conduct being carried out with the relevant intention. (7) Subject to subsection (8), it is not necessary that each element of an offence against section 254 that is attributed to a body corporate by force of subsection (1) be supplied by the same associate of the body corporate.
(4) The means by which authorisation or permission as required by section 254(1)(b)(ii) may be established include— (a) proving that an officer of the body corporate gave that authorisation or permission; or (b) proving that the body corporate's board of directors gave that authorisation or permission; or (c) proving that a corporate culture existed within the body corporate that directed, encouraged, tolerated or led to the relevant conduct being carried out. (5) Subsection (4)(a) does not apply if the body corporate proves that it exercised due diligence to prevent the authorisation or permission being given. (6) Factors relevant to the application of subsection (1)(c)(iii) or (4)(c) include— (a) whether authority to commit an offence against section 254 or an offence of a similar character had been given by an officer of the body corporate; and (b) whether the associate of the body corporate who carried out the relevant conduct or formed the relevant intention believed on reasonable grounds, or entertained a reasonable expectation, that an officer of the body corporate would have authorised or permitted the relevant conduct being carried out with the relevant intention. (7) Subject to subsection (8), it is not necessary that each element of an offence against section 254 that is attributed to a body corporate by force of subsection (1) be supplied by the same associate of the body corporate.
58-6231a249C.docx