Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring Ghana Partnership for Education Grant Results Framework . Project Development Objective . PDO Statement The Project Development Objective is to improve the planning, monitoring and delivery of basic education services in deprived districts of the Territory. Recipient’s . Project Development Objective Indicators Cumulative Target Values Data Source/ Responsibility for Unit of Methodology Data Collection Indicator Name Core Baseline YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 End Target Frequency Measure DED provides data to RED Deprived districts Report of which consolidates the disbursing 75% or more financial information and submits a of their district education Percentage 0 60% 70% 80% - - 80% Annual analysis of report to GES HQ & PBME. grants as planned in their APWs Inputs are incorporated into APW the NESAR. School data in SRCs Public basic schools in Report of submitted to districts deprived districts with 0 analysis and 2X/year. RED aggregates Percentage 10% 50% 75% - - 75% Annual up-to-date School Report summary of data into M&E report and Cards School submits copy to GES HQ & Report Cards PBME. P3 students achieving proficiency in English P3 English: 12.4% P3 English: 15% National GES overseeing National and Math (NEA results Percentage - - Biennial Education Education Assessment for deprived districts) P3 Math: 9.0% P3 Math: 11% Assessment Teachers trained under the project in deprived districts who obtain Sample satisfactory rating or survey using DED and RED overseeing higher in the SBI/CBI SBI/CBI sample survey on the Percentage 0 0 20% 50% - - 50% Annual Lesson Observation Lesson SBI/CBI Lesson Observation Sheet for (a) lesson Observation Sheet planning (b) teaching Sheet methodology (c) classroom organization
Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring Ghana Partnership for Education Grant Results Framework . Project Development Objective . PDO Statement The Project Development Objective is to improve the planning, monitoring and delivery of basic education services in deprived districts of the Recipient’s Territory. . Project Development Objective Indicators Cumulative Target Values Data Source/ Responsibility for Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 YR5 End Target Frequency Methodology Data Collection Deprived districts disbursing 75% or more of their district education grants as planned in their APW Percentage 0 60% 70% 80% - - 80% Annual Report of financial analysis of APWs DED provides data to RED which consolidates the information and submits a report to GES HQ & PBME. Inputs are incorporated into the NESAR. Public basic schools in deprived districts with up-to-date School Report Cards Percentage 0 10% 50% 75% - - 75% Annual Report of analysis and summary of School Report Cards School data in SRCs submitted to districts 2X/year. RED aggregates data into M&E report and submits copy to GES HQ & PBME. P3 students achieving proficiency in English and Math (NEA results for deprived districts) Percentage P3 English: 12.4% P3 Math: 9.0% - - P3 English: 15% P3 Math: 11% Biennial National Education Assessment GES overseeing National Education Assessment Teachers trained under the project in deprived districts who obtain satisfactory rating or higher in the SBI/CBI Lesson Observation Sheet for (a) lesson planning (b) teaching methodology (c) classroom organization Percentage 0 0 20% 50% - - 50% Annual Sample survey using SBI/CBI Lesson Observation Sheet DED and RED overseeing sample survey on the SBI/CBI Lesson Observation Sheet
729490PAD0P1290ox0379820B00PUBLIC0.docx