Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding R.14-10-010 number: 6. Date of ALJ ruling: 02/03/15 7. Based on another CPUC determination D.17-09-014 Verified (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible Yes government entity status? Showing of or §1803.1(b)) “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding R.14-10-010 number: 10. Date of ALJ ruling: 02/03/15 11. Based on another CPUC determination D.17-09-014 Verified (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.18-01-003 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: January 17, 2018 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: February 21, 2018 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). (For each contribution, support with specific reference to the record.) Specific References to CPUC Intervenor’s Claimed Intervenor’s Contribution(s) Claimed Contribution(s) Discussion Decision D.18-01-003 on (please note that Attachment 2 Noted Multiple Use Application includes a list of issue areas, and of (MUA) Issues GPI Pleadings relevant to this Claim.) 1. Domains, Services and Decision Verified Rules for MUAs. Much of the focus and discussion prior The Staff Proposal on MUAs to the issuance of the Report focused proposed 20 domains and use on enabling a set of specific use cases.
Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-10-010 6. Date of ALJ ruling: 02/03/15 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.17-09-014 Verified 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible government entity status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) or §1803.1(b)) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-10-010 10. Date of ALJ ruling: 02/03/15 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.17-09-014 Verified 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.18-01-003 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: January 17, 2018 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: February 21, 2018 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). (For each contribution, support with specific reference to the record.) Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion Decision D.18-01-003 on Multiple Use Application (MUA) Issues (please note that Attachment 2 includes a list of issue areas, and of GPI Pleadings relevant to this Claim.) Noted 1. Domains, Services and Rules for MUAs. The Staff Proposal on MUAs proposed 20 domains and use Decision Much of the focus and discussion prior to the issuance of the Report focused on enabling a set of specific use cases. Verified
213081849.docx