improvements on collaborative operation documents Stakeholder the import and use of responsible parties consultations held of new dangerous No action plan in chemical substances place to support operation of the MEA coordinating mechanism Component 2: Overall mercury situation assessed and initial mercury reduction and containment plan formulated Outcome 2.1: Capacity building No previous larger Capacity building Capacity building Training Willingness of Mercury programme scale efforts applied to program (trainings) program (trainings) for workshop private sector to assessment (trainings) for build capacity of for involved involved stakeholders reports participate. implemented, involved related stakeholders stakeholders completed. Draft Government’s national stakeholders on mercury prepared and legislation support to the consultations held developed and negotiations, mercury initiated. capacity building Media reports to identify priorities implemented on convention, mercury At least, three (3) programme Stakeholder for actions and mercury risks, associated risks etc training workshops consultations capacity building on inventories, sources, Limitations in the held Stakeholder mercury risks data tracking scale of stakeholder One hundred (100) feedback on carried out activities on mercury, participants trainings with exception to participated in training Project and workshops WB’s meeting reports programme on Key stakeholders Draft decontamination are trained in documents inventory and data tracking Mercury situation in No national mercury Partnership with Assessment of Survey Cooperation Kazakhstan assessment made, stakeholders mercury reports on data access country’s assessed in except in form of waste established sources, releases, is low Source and coordinated manner product contaminated sites and Data sources on-site Lack of jointly with UNEP priority areas for No database on accessed verifications suitable mercury control sources and mercury legislative Major sources are Draft completed releases is in existence identified assessment framework on The data reporting reports No full National capacity to country’s baseline data is understanding of scale Data quality is manage mercury Project established. impact on human low products and waste reports health Information made assessed and available through recommendations for database and open capacity improvement
collaborative operation of responsible parties No action plan in place to support operation of the MEA coordinating mechanism Stakeholder consultations held documents improvements on the import and use of new dangerous chemical substances Component 2: Overall mercury situation assessed and initial mercury reduction and containment plan formulated Outcome 2.1: Mercury assessment implemented, national consultations held to identify priorities for actions and capacity building on mercury risks carried out Capacity building programme (trainings) for involved stakeholders developed and implemented on mercury risks, inventories, sources, data tracking No previous larger scale efforts applied to build capacity of related stakeholders on mercury negotiations, mercury convention, mercury associated risks etc Limitations in the scale of stakeholder activities on mercury, with exception to WB’s programme on decontamination Capacity building program (trainings) for involved stakeholders prepared and initiated. At least, three (3) training workshops held One hundred (100) participants participated in training workshops Key stakeholders are trained in inventory and data tracking Capacity building program (trainings) for involved stakeholders completed. Training workshop reports Draft legislation Media reports Stakeholder consultations Stakeholder feedback on trainings Project and meeting reports Draft documents Willingness of private sector to participate. Government’s support to the capacity building programme Mercury situation in Kazakhstan assessed in coordinated manner jointly with UNEP No national mercury assessment made, except in form of waste product No database on sources and mercury releases is in existence No full understanding of scale impact on human health Partnership with stakeholders established Data sources accessed Major sources are identified National capacity to manage mercury products and waste assessed and recommendations for capacity improvement Assessment of country’s mercury sources, releases, contaminated sites and priority areas for mercury control completed The country’s baseline data is established. Information made available through database and open Survey reports Source and on-site verifications Draft assessment reports Project reports Cooperation on data access is low Lack of suitable legislative framework on data reporting Data quality is low
4612_medwaste_ProDoc%20vFinal.docx