1. A consideration of whether 2. The extent to which God 3. The extent to which 4. Strengths and weaknesses of 5. Whether moral responsibility is 6. The extent to which religious believers should accept predestines humanity. philosophical, scientific and/or Hard and/or Soft Determinism. an illusion. influences our predestination. psychological determinism understanding of God illustrate that humanity has no free will. 7. How convincing are religious 8. The extent to which an 9. The extent to which 10. The extent to which free moral 11. The degree to which free will 12. The degree to which beliefs views on free will. individual has free choice. philosophical, scientific and/or agents should follow a normative makes the use of prayer irrelevant. about free will can be reconciled psychological views on ethic. with beliefs about predestination libertarianism inevitably lead people to accept libertarianism.
1. A consideration of whether religious believers should accept predestination. 2. The extent to which God predestines humanity. 3. The extent to which philosophical, scientific and/or psychological determinism illustrate that humanity has no free will. 4. Strengths and weaknesses of Hard and/or Soft Determinism. 5. Whether moral responsibility is an illusion. 6. The extent to which influences our understanding of God 7. How convincing are religious views on free will. 8. The extent to which an individual has free choice. 9. The extent to which philosophical, scientific and/or psychological views on libertarianism inevitably lead people to accept libertarianism. 10. The extent to which free moral agents should follow a normative ethic. 11. The degree to which free will makes the use of prayer irrelevant. 12. The degree to which beliefs about free will can be reconciled with beliefs about predestination
5-ethics-theme-4-revision.docx