By 2013, 45% of The results This year we students will achieve of the 2012 would like to a level 7 or above on FAA Reading have 45% of the FAA reading Test indicate our students assessment. that we had score a level 6 (37%) 7 or above students in on the FAA grades 3-6 Reading who scored test. a level 7 or above on the FAA Reading. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. Based on the analysis of student achievement data and Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Process Used to Determine Evaluation Tool reference to Questions,” identify and define Responsible for Monitoring Effectiveness of Strategy “Guiding areas in need of improvement for the following group: 3A. FCAT 2.0: Percentage of students making 5b.2. 5b.2. 5b.2. 5b.2. 5b.2. Lack of Standards-Based Modify master schedule to provide Administrative Team, Classroom Walk Throughs; Ongoing Process monitoring; learning gains in reading. Instruction School-wide common planning and staggered instructional coaches, teacher Lesson Plans; Meeting Agendas Success Maker data; intervention time for all grade leaders/grade level chairs, Reading Goal #3A: 2012 Current 2013 Expected levels. district personnel Level of Level of Performance:* Performance:* By 2013, 35% of The results In 2013 we students making 5b. 2 of the 2012 like to learning gains Common planning will ensure the FCAT have 35% of on the FCAT reading following: collaboration, Reading Test our students assessment. unpacking standards, creation and indicate that make utilization of up-to-date data we had 26% learning binders, and fidelity of of students gains on the implementation of school-wide in grades FCAT non-negotiables who made Reading. 5b.2 Establish non-negotiables and learning ensure fidelity to include PLCs, on the FCAT attendance at faculty meetings, Reading. accountability for behavior/class
By 2013, 45% of students will achieve a level 7 or above on the FAA reading assessment. The results of the 2012 FAA Reading Test indicate that we had 6 (37%) students in grades 3-6 who scored a level 7 or above on the FAA Reading. This year we would like to have 45% of our students score a level 7 or above on the FAA Reading test. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.2. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. 2B.3. Based on the analysis of student achievement data and reference to “Guiding Questions,” identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following group: Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 3A. FCAT 2.0: Percentage of students making learning gains in reading. 5b.2. Lack of Standards-Based Instruction School-wide 5b.2. Modify master schedule to provide common planning and staggered intervention time for all grade levels. 5b. 2 Common planning will ensure the following: collaboration, unpacking standards, creation and utilization of up-to-date data binders, and fidelity of implementation of school-wide non-negotiables 5b.2 Establish non-negotiables and ensure fidelity to include PLCs, attendance at faculty meetings, accountability for behavior/class 5b.2. Administrative Team, instructional coaches, teacher leaders/grade level chairs, district personnel 5b.2. Classroom Walk Throughs; Lesson Plans; Meeting Agendas 5b.2. Ongoing Process monitoring; Success Maker data; Reading Goal #3A: By 2013, 35% of students making learning gains on the FCAT reading assessment. 2012 Current Level of Performance:* 2013 Expected Level of Performance:* The results of the 2012 FCAT Reading Test indicate that we had 26% of students in grades who made learning on the FCAT Reading. In 2013 we like to have 35% of our students make learning gains on the FCAT Reading.
Endeavour%20Elementary.docx