Review, select and Advanced Practice with M = 4.39 M = 4.4 15, 48 Benchmark met apply developmentally and Small Systems I 96.9% 100% M = 3.88 culturally competent Therapeutic intervention 94.4% assessment, intervention and project evaluation models; 95% Integrate Advanced Practice with M = 4.45 M = 4.6 14, 49 Benchmark met Small Systems II 96.9% 100% M = 4.04 knowledge of individual and Family therapy paper 96.7% family life span development 95% in the context of the environment to understand the human condition. client’s 2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work services Stay current with Program Evaluation M = 4.33 M = 3.8 50 Benchmark met Final Paper political and 100% 80% M = 3.93 – political, economic, social, ethics 96.6% and environmental trends that 95% create policies that may have a negative impact on client systems; Collaborate with Program Evaluation M = 4.06 M = 3.8 16, 51 Benchmark met Final paper implications 97% 80% M = 3.08 stakeholders who engage in – 95% 74.2% policy making that affect program designs, program funding and service delivery; Choose appropriate Dynamics of Race and M = 4.51 M = 4.8 52 Benchmark met Discrimination 100% 100% M = 3.84 methods for advocating on Final paper 93.3% behalf of individuals, families 95% and small groups.
Review, select and apply developmentally and culturally competent assessment, intervention and evaluation models; Advanced Practice with Small Systems I Therapeutic intervention project 95% M = 4.39 96.9% M = 4.4 100% 15, 48 M = 3.88 94.4% Benchmark met Integrate knowledge of individual and family life span development in the context of the environment to understand the client’s human condition. Advanced Practice with Small Systems II Family therapy paper 95% M = 4.45 96.9% M = 4.6 100% 14, 49 M = 4.04 96.7% Benchmark met 2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work services Stay current with political, economic, social, and environmental trends that create policies that may have a negative impact on client systems; Program Evaluation Final Paper – political and ethics 95% M = 4.33 100% M = 3.8 80% 50 M = 3.93 96.6% Benchmark met Collaborate with stakeholders who engage in policy making that affect program designs, program funding and service delivery; Program Evaluation Final paper – implications 95% M = 4.06 97% M = 3.8 80% 16, 51 M = 3.08 74.2% Benchmark met Choose appropriate methods for advocating on behalf of individuals, families and small groups. Dynamics of Race and Discrimination Final paper 95% M = 4.51 100% M = 4.8 100% 52 M = 3.84 93.3% Benchmark met
2e3cb82b-1f13-4cfd-8ac7-bf3d5b90cb99.docx