Journal publications in the year of formal acceptance or publication date. The faculty member must clearly state which date is to be considered. Papers presented in the year the meeting is held Banking of Intellectual Contributions For purposes of evaluation, faculty may "bank" intellectual contributions. In other words, faculty may decide to have certain intellectual contributions count in another year. All peer-reviewed publications (articles and equivalents under the Tenure and Promotion policy) can be to two years. This can be done as long as the faculty member “banked” up clearly indicates which publication is going to count in which year. This would mean that an article with a publication date in 2012 can be counted in 2012, 2013 or 2014. Faculty also still have the option of counting an article in the year of acceptance or publication which essentially gives a faculty member a four-year window into which they can count the publication for evaluation purposes if an acceptance occurs the year before publication. Departmental chairs/directors will be required to maintain a record of which publications are counted in which year in the Faculty Annual Evaluation Form. Applied/Practice Engagement Faculty meeting the sustained engagement activity requirement through applied/practice engagement will be evaluated in terms of the number of points they have accumulated under Appendix A in the Standards for Faculty Qualification Policy. For new faculty, points earned for activities before being hired but within the past 5 years are to be included as part of the rolling five-year total for purposes of determining academic qualification. However, only points earned within the past year are considered "new" points. Level 1 - No activities in the last five years related to maintaining sustained engagement Level 2 - Participated in activities that have added at least 1 to 4 new points to the rolling five-year total Level 3 - Participated in activities that have added 5-7 new points to the rolling five-year total Level 3.5 - Participated in activities that have added 8-9 new points to the rolling total Level 4 - Participated in activities that have added 10-12 new points to the rolling total Level 3 - Participated in activities that have added 13-14 new points to the rolling total
Journal publications in the year of formal acceptance or publication date. The faculty member must clearly state which date is to be considered. Papers presented in the year the meeting is held Banking of Intellectual Contributions For purposes of evaluation, faculty may "bank" intellectual contributions. In other words, faculty may decide to have certain intellectual contributions count in another year. All peer-reviewed publications (articles and equivalents under the Tenure and Promotion policy) can be “banked” up to two years. This can be done as long as the faculty member clearly indicates which publication is going to count in which year. This would mean that an article with a publication date in 2012 can be counted in 2012, 2013 or 2014. Faculty also still have the option of counting an article in the year of acceptance or publication which essentially gives a faculty member a four-year window into which they can count the publication for evaluation purposes if an acceptance occurs the year before publication. Departmental chairs/directors will be required to maintain a record of which publications are counted in which year in the Faculty Annual Evaluation Form. Applied/Practice Engagement Faculty meeting the sustained engagement activity requirement through applied/practice engagement will be evaluated in terms of the number of points they have accumulated under Appendix A in the Standards for Faculty Qualification Policy. For new faculty, points earned for activities before being hired but within the past 5 years are to be included as part of the rolling five-year total for purposes of determining academic qualification. However, only points earned within the past year are considered "new" points. Level 1 - No activities in the last five years related to maintaining sustained engagement Level 2 - Participated in activities that have added at least 1 to 4 new points to the rolling five-year total Level 3 - Participated in activities that have added 5-7 new points to the rolling five-year total Level 3.5 - Participated in activities that have added 8-9 new points to the rolling total Level 4 - Participated in activities that have added 10-12 new points to the rolling total Level 3 - Participated in activities that have added 13-14 new points to the rolling total
32_636215372663926770_Appendix_A_Faculty_Evaluation_Criteria.docx