it is a MoE project it will use and adapt not the project's intention, then is the existing national policies and strategies project's aim to apply indicators that (NBSAP) as well as national targets and will be defined at a higher level? If so, indicators linked to Aichi. Through the relying on another process to deliver biodiversity vision and strategic national these is a risk. management plan for protected areas the project will help to coordinate monitoring of indicators and targets. The recommendation has been taken in Appendix 14B. Procurement plan for 11. STAP recommends indicating the consideration. The project document and numbers of professional staff involved consultancy services budgets indicate the need for technical and in each project component. This operational human resources in each information would facilitate component/outcome. With high levels of understanding the relative priority of there is a significant logistical and each aspect, and the likelihood that coordination role, so the relative priority is stated aims can be achieved. more clearly seen when considering the overall co-finance budget Through stakeholder discussion the project Annex 4 and 5 and point 3.2,.3.3 12. STAP recommends revisiting the framework has been significantly revised to project framework so that the outputs build in practicality. In summary the ProDoc are stated as products rather than has two Component/Outcomes replacing the restating the outcomes, or expressing seven PIF outcomes, which became more as activity targets practical outputs. This has been done, and a list of abbreviation Page 6 on the project document 13. It would be helpful to define the has been added on page 6. abbreviations at first use. Annex C: status of implementation of project preparation activities and the use of funds A. provide detailed amount of the ppg activities financing status in the table below: PPG Grant Approved at PIF: USD 100,000 Project Preparation Activities Implemented GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF Amount ($) Budgeted Amount Spent Amount Amount to date Committed 70,000 42,134 27,866 Consultants Meetings & workshop 19,500 13,166 6,334 Travel and other 10,500 7,150 3,350 62,450 37,550 Total 100,000 annex D: calendar of expected reflows (if non-grant instrument is used) Provide a calendar of expected reflows to the GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF Trust Fund or to your Agency (and/or revolving fund that will be set up)
not the project's intention, then is the project's aim to apply indicators that will be defined at a higher level? If so, relying on another process to deliver these is a risk. it is a MoE project it will use and adapt existing national policies and strategies (NBSAP) as well as national targets and indicators linked to Aichi. Through the biodiversity vision and strategic national management plan for protected areas the project will help to coordinate monitoring of indicators and targets. 11. STAP recommends indicating the numbers of professional staff involved in each project component. This information would facilitate understanding the relative priority of each aspect, and the likelihood that stated aims can be achieved. The recommendation has been taken in consideration. The project document and budgets indicate the need for technical and operational human resources in each component/outcome. With high levels of there is a significant logistical and coordination role, so the relative priority is more clearly seen when considering the overall co-finance budget Appendix 14B. Procurement plan for consultancy services 12. STAP recommends revisiting the project framework so that the outputs are stated as products rather than restating the outcomes, or expressing as activity targets Through stakeholder discussion the project framework has been significantly revised to build in practicality. In summary the ProDoc has two Component/Outcomes replacing the seven PIF outcomes, which became more practical outputs. Annex 4 and 5 and point 3.2,.3.3 13. It would be helpful to define the abbreviations at first use. This has been done, and a list of abbreviation has been added on page 6. Page 6 on the project document Annex C: status of implementation of project preparation activities and the use of funds A. provide detailed amount of the ppg activities financing status in the table below: PPG Grant Approved at PIF: USD 100,000 Project Preparation Activities Implemented GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF Amount ($) Budgeted Amount Amount Spent to date Amount Committed Consultants 70,000 42,134 27,866 Meetings & workshop 19,500 13,166 6,334 Travel and other 10,500 7,150 3,350 Total 100,000 62,450 37,550 annex D: calendar of expected reflows (if non-grant instrument is used) Provide a calendar of expected reflows to the GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF Trust Fund or to your Agency (and/or revolving fund that will be set up)
05-15-15_CAMPAS_CEO_Endorsement_Request_0.docx