On October 3, 2017, SCE filed, on behalf of PG&E, SDG&E and itself, a response to SoCalGas’s motion. Also on October 3, 2017, the assigned ALJ granted SoCalGas’s motion to strike portions of GreenFan’s and Verified’s comments. On October 13, 2017, the following parties filed final reply comments on the business plan applications: NAESCO; City and County of San Francisco; MCE; CodeCycle; CEE; GreenFan and Verified; San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization; Demand Council; PG&E; San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization, Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, High Sierra Energy Foundation, County of San Luis Obispo, Redwood Energy Authority; County of Ventura; SoCalGas; California Community Choice Association; SCE; SoCalREN; SBUA; TURN; ORA; SDG&E; LGSEC; ABAG. Also on October 13, 2017, SoCalGas filed a motion to strike portions of ORA’s final opening comments, pertaining to SoCalGas’s codes and standards advocacy activities. On October 27, 2017, ORA filed a response to SoCalGas’s motion to strike portions of ORA’s final opening comments. On November 13, 2017, the assigned ALJ issued a ruling denying SoCalGas’s motion to file an amended business plan, and directing SoCalGas to instead seek approval for its proposed 2018 budget through the ABAL process. Also on November 13, 2017, the Commission issued a proposed decision to adopt the framework for third party solicitations. On November 14, 2017, the assigned ALJ issued a ruling denying SoCalGas’s motion to strike portions of ORA’s final opening comments. On January 11, 2018, following a round of opening and reply comments on the proposed decision, the Commission adopted D.1801004, which established a
On October 3, 2017, SCE filed, on behalf of PG&E, SDG&E and itself, a response to SoCalGas’s motion. Also on October 3, 2017, the assigned ALJ granted SoCalGas’s motion to strike portions of GreenFan’s and Verified’s comments. On October 13, 2017, the following parties filed final reply comments on the business plan applications: NAESCO; City and County of San Francisco; MCE; CodeCycle; CEE; GreenFan and Verified; San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization; Demand Council; PG&E; San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization, Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments, High Sierra Energy Foundation, County of San Luis Obispo, Redwood Energy Authority; County of Ventura; SoCalGas; California Community Choice Association; SCE; SoCalREN; SBUA; TURN; ORA; SDG&E; LGSEC; ABAG. Also on October 13, 2017, SoCalGas filed a motion to strike portions of ORA’s final opening comments, pertaining to SoCalGas’s codes and standards advocacy activities. On October 27, 2017, ORA filed a response to SoCalGas’s motion to strike portions of ORA’s final opening comments. On November 13, 2017, the assigned ALJ issued a ruling denying SoCalGas’s motion to file an amended business plan, and directing SoCalGas to instead seek approval for its proposed 2018 budget through the ABAL process. Also on November 13, 2017, the Commission issued a proposed decision to adopt the framework for third party solicitations. On November 14, 2017, the assigned ALJ issued a ruling denying SoCalGas’s motion to strike portions of ORA’s final opening comments. On January 11, 2018, following a round of opening and reply comments on the proposed decision, the Commission adopted D.1801004, which established a
215706139.docx