ASSESSMENT At present, the procurement system does not have a quality assurance and procurement process monitoring system as such. Nor does it have indicators to evaluate the performance of the officials and offices that participate in procurement. There are no job descriptions or office function descriptions for the procurement units yet. Operational audits aimed at monitoring compliance with procurement quality standards have not been implemented. Conclusions: Internally speaking, the procurement system does not meet the sub-indicator requirements because equality assurance, monitoring, and staff performance evaluation mechanisms based on results and professional behavior have not been developed nor are there mechanisms for operational audits that verify compliance with the above-mentioned aspects. Score: Considering the above, a score of 0 is given to this indicator.
ASSESSMENT At present, the procurement system does not have a quality assurance and procurement process monitoring system as such. Nor does it have indicators to evaluate the performance of the officials and offices that participate in procurement. There are no job descriptions or office function descriptions for the procurement units yet. Operational audits aimed at monitoring compliance with procurement quality standards have not been implemented. Conclusions: Internally speaking, the procurement system does not meet the sub-indicator requirements because equality assurance, monitoring, and staff performance evaluation mechanisms based on results and professional behavior have not been developed nor are there mechanisms for operational audits that verify compliance with the above-mentioned aspects. Score: Considering the above, a score of 0 is given to this indicator.
551130ESW0Volu1Volume0III01English.docx