Matters, d. 6-16-17, p.1. Citations to D1801022: "WEM points out that as PG&E's bundled load decreases, more of Diablo Canyon's output will need to be sold at a loss on the wholesale market, and that: 'This foreseeable development will make continued operation of Diablo Canyon increasingly uneconomic and dysfunctional, and this will likely begin to happen before 2020, not 2025.' " D1801022, p.13. "WEM and Mothers for Peace raise valid concerns about the current cost of operating Diablo Canyon, and the potential for significant costs that could be incurred between now and 2024/25 …" D1801022, p.14. 2. Retirement of Diablo Citations to WEM's Work: Verified Canyon: Advocacy for "[E]arly retirement is feasible. Retirement Date Earlier than PG&E is clearly on record in this 2024/2025 proceeding stating that all the WEM supported DCPP energy can be replaced in the retirement, but recommended contingency of an early retirement, that the plant be retired and that the only concern is the earlier than the 2024/2025 potential effect on greenhouse gas dates originally requested by emissions." PG&E in its Application. Opening Brief of Women's Energy Consistent with WEM's Matters, d. 5-26-17, p.2. advocacy, D1801022, "WEM recommends: contains language that allows That Diablo be retired as soon the Commission to consider as possible, prior to the expiration retirement earlier than of its operating licenses 2024/25. …" Opening Brief of Women's Energy Matters, d. 5-26-17, p.22. Canyon should be retired “Diablo as soon as possible, but in no case after it becomes a stranded asset because bundled PG&E’s
Matters, d. 6-16-17, p.1. Citations to D1801022: "WEM points out that as PG&E's bundled load decreases, more of Diablo Canyon's output will need to be sold at a loss on the wholesale market, and that: 'This foreseeable development will make continued operation of Diablo Canyon increasingly uneconomic and dysfunctional, and this will likely begin to happen before 2020, not 2025.' " D1801022, p.13. "WEM and Mothers for Peace raise valid concerns about the current cost of operating Diablo Canyon, and the potential for significant costs that could be incurred between now and 2024/25 …" D1801022, p.14. 2. Retirement of Diablo Canyon: Advocacy for Retirement Date Earlier than 2024/2025 WEM supported DCPP retirement, but recommended that the plant be retired earlier than the 2024/2025 dates originally requested by PG&E in its Application. Consistent with WEM's advocacy, D1801022, contains language that allows the Commission to consider retirement earlier than 2024/25. Citations to WEM's Work: "[E]arly retirement is feasible. PG&E is clearly on record in this proceeding stating that all the energy can be replaced in the contingency of an early retirement, and that the only concern is the potential effect on greenhouse gas emissions." Opening Brief of Women's Energy Matters, d. 5-26-17, p.2. "WEM recommends: That Diablo be retired as soon as possible, prior to the expiration of its operating licenses …" Opening Brief of Women's Energy Matters, d. 5-26-17, p.22. “Diablo Canyon should be retired as soon as possible, but in no case after it becomes a stranded asset because PG&E’s bundled Verified
218186775.docx