Table 16. Risk log for the project with proposed mitigation measures (P)robability Countermeasures/ # Description of risk Potential consequence Risk category and (I)mpact management response (1-5) 1 Inter-agency collaboration Challenged functionality of Breakdown of inter-agency Build of inter-agency platform for 1.1 Institutional I = 4 P = 5 inter-agency committees communication dialogue and collaboration Build working relationships Perception of inequity of Agencies unable to prompt 1.2 through collaborative action Institutional I = 3 P = 4 relations or lack of ownership collaboration towards specific aims Breakdown of collaborative Agencies unwilling to share Promote and strengthen 1.3 Institutional I = 4 P = 5 resource management resources dialogue and coordination 2 Sustainability of project outcomes Lack of mainstreamed Project outcomes remain project Financial needs sought through 2.1 financing to sustain project Financial I = 4 P = 4 based/ un-sustained means other than government outcomes Lack of sustainable financing Project outcomes are not Increase of revenue flows from 2.2 Financial I = 3 P = 4 and human capacity replicated/ expanded economic development Insufficient alternative Financial resources remain Increase of revenues from 2.3 Financial I = 2 P = 3 financing mechanisms government-dependent environmental services 3 Climate change impacts and adaptation investment 3.1 Climate change impacts Impact to ecosystems and species Integrated landscape management Biological themselves due to change in precipitation, planning and management Socioeconomic I = 4 P = 5 temperature, weather conditions planning for target protected areas 3.2 Insufficient investment for Lack of funds to adapt to effects Adaptive management factored Financial climate change adaptation of climate change into specific protected area Socioeconomic I = 4 P = 4 system 4 Competing land use activities and commitment of local communities 4.1 Competing special interests for Inequitable/ unsustainable use of Transparency on governance and Financial I = 4 P = 5 rightful use of lands/ resources land and resources use of land and resources Socioeconomic 4.2 Competing community land use Unsustainable landscape Work closely with local Socioeconomic in landscape connectivity sites connectivity outside protected community stakeholders for I = 5 P = 5 areas landscape planning
Table 16. Risk log for the project with proposed mitigation measures # Description of risk Potential consequence Countermeasures/ management response Risk category (P)robability and (I)mpact (1-5) 1 Inter-agency collaboration 1.1 Challenged functionality of inter-agency committees Breakdown of inter-agency communication Build of inter-agency platform for dialogue and collaboration Institutional I = 4 P = 5 1.2 Perception of inequity of relations or lack of ownership Agencies unable to prompt collaboration Build working relationships through collaborative action towards specific aims Institutional I = 3 P = 4 1.3 Breakdown of collaborative resource management Agencies unwilling to share resources Promote and strengthen dialogue and coordination Institutional I = 4 P = 5 2 Sustainability of project outcomes 2.1 Lack of mainstreamed financing to sustain project outcomes Project outcomes remain project based/ un-sustained Financial needs sought through means other than government Financial I = 4 P = 4 2.2 Lack of sustainable financing and human capacity Project outcomes are not replicated/ expanded Increase of revenue flows from economic development Financial I = 3 P = 4 2.3 Insufficient alternative financing mechanisms Financial resources remain government-dependent Increase of revenues from environmental services Financial I = 2 P = 3 3 Climate change impacts and adaptation investment 3.1 Climate change impacts themselves Impact to ecosystems and species due to change in precipitation, temperature, weather conditions Integrated landscape management planning and management planning for target protected areas Biological Socioeconomic I = 4 P = 5 3.2 Insufficient investment for climate change adaptation Lack of funds to adapt to effects of climate change Adaptive management factored into specific protected area system Financial Socioeconomic I = 4 P = 4 4 Competing land use activities and commitment of local communities 4.1 Competing special interests for rightful use of lands/ resources Inequitable/ unsustainable use of land and resources Transparency on governance and use of land and resources Financial Socioeconomic I = 4 P = 5 4.2 Competing community land use in landscape connectivity sites Unsustainable landscape connectivity outside protected areas Work closely with local community stakeholders for landscape planning Socioeconomic I = 5 P = 5
05-15-15_CAMPAS_UNEP_Project_Document_0.docx