2.) Complications in Pesticides Lists. Technically, this PERSUAP only “approved” approves the seven new AIs in Table 2. Since this PERSUAP does not include all of the NAFAKA I AIs in Table 3, rather, it a subset of the AIs approved in the “approves” NAFAKA I PERSUAP. To prevent the reader from thinking that the seven new AIs in Table 2 plus of the approved NAFAKA I AIs can be used, all the BEO regards Table 3 The users of this PERSUAP should understand as the Approved list for this PERSUAP. that only selected NAFAKA I AIs can be used in addition to the seven new AIs in Table 2. 3.) Tanzanian pesticide registration status. The Tanzanian (TRPI) pesticide registration status of the pesticides presented in the NAFAKA II PERSUAP is not identified (whereas the MnM PERSUAP does do so). 4.) The Fall Armyworm outbreak in Africa and Tanzania is not adequately factored into this PERSUAP. 5.) Any future PERSUAP from Tanzania Consolidated future PERSUAP. in Ag/EG/Food Security will be a consolidated, single document covering the whole portfolio and all value chains. These issues, and the redundancies and duplicative treatment of pesticides in the multiple Tanzanian PERSUAPs must be resolved in any future unified Tanzanian Agriculture sector PERSUAP. APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION RECOMMENDED: CLEARANCE: Mission Director, USAID Tanzania: Cleared Date: Andrew Karas CONCURRENCE: Bureau Environmental Officer: Date: Brian Hirsch Tanzania Cereals Marketing Systems Development (NAFAKA II) PERSUAP File Name: Amendment #1 2017-2020. ECD Tracking ID: ADDITIONAL CLEARANCES: Agreement Officer’s Representative: ____________ Date: _________06\12\2017_
2.) Complications in “approved” Pesticides Lists. Technically, this PERSUAP only approves the seven new AIs in Table 2. Since this PERSUAP does not include all of the NAFAKA I AIs in Table 3, rather, it “approves” a subset of the AIs approved in the NAFAKA I PERSUAP. To prevent the reader from thinking that the seven new AIs in Table 2 plus all of the approved NAFAKA I AIs can be used, the BEO regards Table 3 as the Approved list for this PERSUAP. The users of this PERSUAP should understand that only selected NAFAKA I AIs can be used in addition to the seven new AIs in Table 2. 3.) Tanzanian pesticide registration status. The Tanzanian (TRPI) pesticide registration status of the pesticides presented in the NAFAKA II PERSUAP is not identified (whereas the MnM PERSUAP does do so). 4.) The Fall Armyworm outbreak in Africa and Tanzania is not adequately factored into this PERSUAP. 5.) Consolidated future PERSUAP. Any future PERSUAP from Tanzania in Ag/EG/Food Security will be a consolidated, single document covering the whole portfolio and all value chains. These issues, and the redundancies and duplicative treatment of pesticides in the multiple Tanzanian PERSUAPs must be resolved in any future unified Tanzanian Agriculture sector PERSUAP. APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION RECOMMENDED: CLEARANCE: Mission Director, USAID Tanzania: Cleared Date: Andrew Karas CONCURRENCE: Bureau Environmental Officer: Date: Brian Hirsch File Name: Tanzania Cereals Marketing Systems Development (NAFAKA II) PERSUAP Amendment #1 2017-2020. ECD Tracking ID: ADDITIONAL CLEARANCES: Agreement Officer’s Representative: ____________ Date: _________06\12\2017_
50647.docx