Curriculum-Specific (CS) Teams design assessment tasks/items to provide evidence CS Team Leaders Week 24 Assessment Matrix of learning/attainment of the standards. (built upon criteria matrix) Curriculum-Specific (CS) teams plan for instructional support based on formative CS Team Leaders Week 24 Unit/Lesson Plans processes that yield diagnostic information needed to address the learning targets Observations effectively. Curriculum-Specific (CS) teams select instructional resources that support CS Team Leaders Week 24 Unit/Lesson Plans attainment of the targets/standards. Some support resources may be publishers Observations criteria (Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool), EQUIP rubrics, KDE Instructional Evaluation Tool If we are not successful, we will: Complete an ongoing reflection of the curricula (Step 6 of MCF) Questions to consider and provide evidence for: How are students building on existing learning and attaining higher levels of achievement? How are students with special needs engaged in quality learning experiences that enable them to achieve? How are students with special talents and abilities engaged in opportunities to work beyond formally described targets? Why is student learning success more important than covering particular achievement objectives? Projected Next Steps: Implement, reflect, revise
Curriculum-Specific (CS) Teams design assessment tasks/items to provide evidence of learning/attainment of the standards. CS Team Leaders Week 24 Assessment Matrix (built upon criteria matrix) Curriculum-Specific (CS) teams plan for instructional support based on formative processes that yield diagnostic information needed to address the learning targets effectively. CS Team Leaders Week 24 Unit/Lesson Plans Observations Curriculum-Specific (CS) teams select instructional resources that support attainment of the targets/standards. Some support resources may be publishers criteria (Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool), EQUIP rubrics, KDE Instructional Evaluation Tool CS Team Leaders Week 24 Unit/Lesson Plans Observations If we are not successful, we will: Complete an ongoing reflection of the curricula (Step 6 of MCF) Questions to consider and provide evidence for: How are students building on existing learning and attaining higher levels of achievement? How are students with special needs engaged in quality learning experiences that enable them to achieve? How are students with special talents and abilities engaged in opportunities to work beyond formally described targets? Why is student learning success more important than covering particular achievement objectives? Projected Next Steps: Implement, reflect, revise
30-60-90%20Day%20Plan%20Design%20and%20Deploy%20Learning%20Standards.docx