3 – The monitoring and evaluation framework to be adopted by will be closely aligned with the ToC as outlined in Figure 5 and Figure 33. For each level of the ToC, the framework outlines relevant performance indicators, the expected baseline, evaluation questions that have emerged, the identification of parties responsible for data collection, key risks to the achievement of the outcomes, targets to be sought, the reporting that would be associated therewith as well as the use of the information provided. An initial framework to be finetuned by the IM looks as follows: Figure 50: Illustrative monitoring and evaluation framework for theory of change - Inputs 4.Evaluation Program 1.Desired result 6.Risks 8.Reporting 9.Use Performance indicators questions of parties 7.Target Provision of Funding available Capital raised and set What does Secretariat; (i) Failure to secure sufficient Quarterly Secretariat and capital to for investment aside for investment funding trustee; IM funding; (ii) higher cost reporting to SAG, to determine investee purposes structures associated with SAG and FAS relevant for operations of EMIIF; (iii) interventions and n/a Zero such an of available funds to report on success activity look investments like, and Provision of TA Funding available Capital raised and set Secretariat; Under-allocation of available Quarterly Secretariat and how best to support to SMEs to support TA aside for TA purposes trustee; IM; funds to TA reporting to SAG, to determine manage this through investee activities investee funds SAG and FAS relevant Zero internally? interventions and n/a report on success Provision of TA Funding available Capital raised and set Secretariat; support to to support TA aside for TA purposes trustee; IM Zero investee activities Set-up of EMIIF (i) Establishment of (i) Relevant legal What are the Secretariat (i) Failure to secure internal Monthly SAG and FAS, to and governance entities, agreements in place; (ii) biggest decision-making and approvals reporting to monitor progress structures; contractual decision-making to challenges ii) Failure to procure relevant SAG and FAS and determine appointment of arrangements, establish governance in services need for trustee and IM governance structures; (iii) meetings completing structures Zero structure; (ii) and engagements of set-up? appointments appointment of relevant stakeholders Target and counterparties
3 – The monitoring and evaluation framework to be adopted by will be closely aligned with the ToC as outlined in Figure 5 and Figure 33. For each level of the ToC, the framework outlines relevant performance indicators, the expected baseline, evaluation questions that have emerged, the identification of parties responsible for data collection, key risks to the achievement of the outcomes, targets to be sought, the reporting that would be associated therewith as well as the use of the information provided. An initial framework to be finetuned by the IM looks as follows: Figure 50: Illustrative monitoring and evaluation framework for theory of change - Inputs Program 1.Desired result Performance indicators 4.Evaluation questions of parties 6.Risks 7.Target 8.Reporting 9.Use Provision of capital to investee Funding available for investment Capital raised and set aside for investment purposes Zero What does funding for such an activity look like, and how best to manage this internally? Secretariat; trustee; IM (i) Failure to secure sufficient funding; (ii) higher cost structures associated with operations of EMIIF; (iii) of available funds to investments n/a Quarterly reporting to SAG and FAS Secretariat and SAG, to determine relevant interventions and report on success Provision of TA support to SMEs through investee Funding available to support TA activities Capital raised and set aside for TA purposes Zero Secretariat; trustee; IM; investee funds Under-allocation of available funds to TA n/a Quarterly reporting to SAG and FAS Secretariat and SAG, to determine relevant interventions and report on success Provision of TA support to investee Funding available to support TA activities Capital raised and set aside for TA purposes Zero Secretariat; trustee; IM Set-up of EMIIF and governance structures; appointment of trustee and IM (i) Establishment of entities, contractual arrangements, governance structure; (ii) appointment of counterparties (i) Relevant legal agreements in place; (ii) decision-making to establish governance structures; (iii) meetings and engagements of relevant stakeholders Zero What are the biggest challenges in completing set-up? Secretariat (i) Failure to secure internal decision-making and approvals ii) Failure to procure relevant services Target structures and appointments Monthly reporting to SAG and FAS SAG and FAS, to monitor progress and determine need for
emiif-draft-design-for-likely-procurement-october-2017.docx