3.58 0.78 .16* .44* .51* .29* .56* .93 3.99 0.78 .43* .45* .50* .55* .51* .45* .89 3.48 0.77 .44* .46* .44* .59* .46* .40* .35* 3.64 0.89 .35* .68* .37* .40* .50* .38* .38* .81 4.22 0.71 .38* .34* .35* .66* .69* .36* .33* .22* 74 3.99 0.85 .32* .33* .57* .35* .50* .49* .40* .36* .35* .85 3.91 0.78 .39* .51* .34* .40* .53* .39* .52* .32* .39* .47* .73 4.24 0.77 .29* .43* .66* .45* .41* .33* .49* .54* .47* .39* .60* .92 *p = 0.05, alpha reliability values of variables. 1. Work itself 2. Possibility for growth 3. Responsibility 4. Recognition (motivational facets)} {5. status 6. relationship with supervisor 7. operation 8. working condition 9. salary (hygiene facets)} 10. Relationship with friends 11. Organizational obligation. 12. Job performance. Table 3: Hierarchical Retrogression Analysis Predicting Job Performance of Workers by Motivator Factor Independent Variable Std Beta Step 1 Std Beta Step Std Beta Step 3 2 Model Variables Organizational obligation .15* .24* .33* Moderating Variable Motivator factor: Work itself (Wis) .30* .41* operation (Ope) .25* .38* Possibility for growth (Pg) .26* .26* Responsibility (Res) .15* .39* Recognition for advancement (Ra) .27* .64* Interaction Terms OO X Wis .18* OO X Ope .29* OO X Pg .38* OO X Res .37* OO X Ra .55* R2 0.59 0.64 0.76
.93 .56* .29* .51* .44* .16* 0.78 3.58 .89 .45* .51* .55* .50* .45* .43* 0.78 3.99 .35* .40* .46* .59* .44* .46* .44* 0.77 3.48 .81 .38* .38* .50* .40* .37* .68* .35* 0.89 3.64 74 .22* .33* .36* .69* .66* .35* .34* .38* 0.71 4.22 .85 .35* .36* .40* .49* .50* .35* .57* .33* .32* 0.85 3.99 .73 .47* .39* .32* .52* .39* .53* .40* .34* .51* .39* 0.78 3.91 .92 .60* .39* .47* .54* .49* .33* .41* .45* .66* .43* .29* 0.77 4.24 *p = 0.05, alpha reliability values of variables. 1. Work itself 2. Possibility for growth 3. Responsibility 4. Recognition (motivational facets)} {5. status 6. relationship with supervisor 7. operation 8. working condition 9. salary (hygiene facets)} 10. Relationship with friends 11. Organizational obligation. 12. Job performance. Table 3: Hierarchical Retrogression Analysis Predicting Job Performance of Workers by Motivator Factor Std Beta Step 3 Std Beta Step 2 Std Beta Step 1 Independent Variable Model Variables .33* .24* .15* Organizational obligation Moderating Variable Motivator factor: .41* .30* Work itself (Wis) .38* .25* operation (Ope) .26* .26* Possibility for growth (Pg) .39* .15* Responsibility (Res) .64* .27* Recognition for advancement (Ra) Interaction Terms .18* OO X Wis .29* OO X Ope .38* OO X Pg .37* OO X Res .55* OO X Ra 0.76 0.64 0.59 R2
353320335996934412_the_effects_of_job_satisfaction_on_organizational_commitment_and_job_performance_relationship.docx