in Ordering Paragraph 1 reflects a Commission determination to take a more restrictive approach regarding the withholding of records from the public: we generally and routinely authorize the disclosure of all safety incident investigation records, once our investigation is closed, with the narrow exception of records that personal include: “any information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or any information which is subject to the lawyer-client Commission’s or other privilege.” We will, however, acknowledge the concern regarding the potential Commenter’s ambiguity in Draft Resolution L-561Ordering Paragraph 1, and modify Finding of Fact 2 and Ordering Paragraph 1 to read, respectively, as follows: Finding of Fact 2. The investigation of the incident is Commission’s closed. Therefore, the public interest favors disclosure of the requested investigation records, with the exception of any personal Commission’s information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or any information which is subject to the lawyer client or other Commission-held privilege. Commission’s Ordering Paragraph 1. The request for disclosure of the Commission records concerning its investigation of the incident is granted, with the exception of any personal information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or any information which is subject to the lawyer client or other Commission’s Commission-held privilege. No Reply Comments were received. FINDINGS OF FACT The Commission received a request seeking disclosure of all Commission records concerning the Safety and investigation of an electrical Enforcement Division’s incident on September 5, 2016 that occurred on 9350 Curry Road, Dixon, California. The investigation of the incident is closed. Therefore, the public Commission’s interest favors disclosure of the requested investigation records, with Commission’s the exception of any personal information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or any information which is subject to the lawyer-client or other Commission-held privilege. Commission’s CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The documents in the requested investigation file and report are public records as defined by Cal. Commission’s Code § 6250, et seq. Gov’t.
in Ordering Paragraph 1 reflects a Commission determination to take a more restrictive approach regarding the withholding of records from the public: we generally and routinely authorize the disclosure of all safety incident investigation records, once our investigation is closed, with the narrow exception of records that include: “any personal information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or any information which is subject to the Commission’s lawyer-client or other privilege.” We will, however, acknowledge the Commenter’s concern regarding the potential ambiguity in Draft Resolution L-561Ordering Paragraph 1, and modify Finding of Fact 2 and Ordering Paragraph 1 to read, respectively, as follows: Finding of Fact 2. The Commission’s investigation of the incident is closed. Therefore, the public interest favors disclosure of the requested Commission’s investigation records, with the exception of any personal information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or any information which is subject to the Commission’s lawyer client or other Commission-held privilege. Ordering Paragraph 1. The request for disclosure of the Commission records concerning its investigation of the incident is granted, with the exception of any personal information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or any information which is subject to the Commission’s lawyer client or other Commission-held privilege. No Reply Comments were received. FINDINGS OF FACT The Commission received a request seeking disclosure of all Commission records concerning the Safety and Enforcement Division’s investigation of an electrical incident on September 5, 2016 that occurred on 9350 Curry Road, Dixon, California. The Commission’s investigation of the incident is closed. Therefore, the public interest favors disclosure of the requested Commission’s investigation records, with the exception of any personal information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, or any information which is subject to the Commission’s lawyer-client or other Commission-held privilege. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The documents in the requested Commission’s investigation file and report are public records as defined by Cal. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et seq.
209586557.docx