Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in A.17-01-012 Verified proceeding number: 6. Date of ALJ ruling: April 24, 2017 Verified 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible Yes government entity status? Showing of or §1803.1(b)) “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in A. A.17-01-012 Verified proceeding number: 10. Date of ALJ ruling: A April 24, 2017 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.17-11-033 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or December 6, 2017 Verified Decision: 15. File date of compensation request: February 5, 2018 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) PREPARED DIRECT 1. Through this application Verified TESTIMONY OF ALEXANDER SDG&E sought recovery of GERSHUNOV, Ph.D. ON $379 million due to uninsured BEHALF OF THE UTILITY losses that resulted from CONSUMERS’ ACTION wildfires ignited by SDG&E NETWORK (UCAN) Parts 1 – equipment in 2007. and Part 2 SDG&E had claimed that even
Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: A.17-01-012 Verified 6. Date of ALJ ruling: April 24, 2017 Verified 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible government entity status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) or §1803.1(b)) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: A. A.17-01-012 Verified 10. Date of ALJ ruling: A April 24, 2017 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.17-11-033 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: December 6, 2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: February 5, 2018 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion 1. Through this application SDG&E sought recovery of $379 million due to uninsured losses that resulted from wildfires ignited by SDG&E equipment in 2007. SDG&E had claimed that even PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ALEXANDER GERSHUNOV, Ph.D. ON BEHALF OF THE UTILITY CONSUMERS’ ACTION NETWORK (UCAN) – Parts 1 and Part 2 Verified
216846889.docx