Fox & Leicht (2005) There were no significant GBAI guilt scores and victim See limitations of Fox, De differences in GBAI-R scores relationship: Koning & Leicht (2003; above). between any of the three groups. Some subjectivity in the ratings F(2,62)=2.80, p=0.07 effect size – There were higher guilt feeling of offence type and severity. d=0.83 scores in the victim well known group, but this was not significant. Guilt feelings were GBAI guilt scores and offence significantly higher in more severity: severe offences (i.e. murder or manslaughter). F(4,62)=2.57, p=0.05 effect size – d=0.36 Wright & Gudjonsson (2007) Two subscales of the ORSGS had ORSGS and TOSCA-3 Scores: Small sample and not all adequate internal consistency and participants were included in Shame-proneness and ORSGS Shame moderate test-retest reliability. each analysis. effect size r=0.39, N=60, p=≤0.01 – There was a significant positive d=0.85 correlation between the ORSGS measurement of shame and guilt, Guilt-proneness and ORSGS Shame and shame and guilt measured by r=0.42, effect size N=60, p=≤0.01 – the TOSCA-3. Scores on the guilt d=0.93 subscale of the GBAI-R was Shame-proneness and ORSGS Guilt significantly correlated with the
Fox & Leicht (2005) There were no significant differences in GBAI-R scores between any of the three groups. There were higher guilt feeling scores in the victim well known group, but this was not significant. Guilt feelings were significantly higher in more severe offences (i.e. murder or manslaughter). GBAI guilt scores and victim relationship: F(2,62)=2.80, p=0.07 – effect size d=0.83 GBAI guilt scores and offence severity: F(4,62)=2.57, p=0.05 – effect size d=0.36 See limitations of Fox, De Koning & Leicht (2003; above). Some subjectivity in the ratings of offence type and severity. Wright & Gudjonsson (2007) Two subscales of the ORSGS had adequate internal consistency and moderate test-retest reliability. There was a significant positive correlation between the ORSGS measurement of shame and guilt, and shame and guilt measured by the TOSCA-3. Scores on the guilt subscale of the GBAI-R was significantly correlated with the ORSGS and TOSCA-3 Scores: Shame-proneness and ORSGS Shame r=0.39, N=60, p=≤0.01 – effect size d=0.85 Guilt-proneness and ORSGS Shame r=0.42, N=60, p=≤0.01 – effect size d=0.93 Shame-proneness and ORSGS Guilt Small sample and not all participants were included in each analysis.
6344163%20E-thesis.docx