6. Caythorpe & Frieston Parish Council (CPC) does not support the applications which have been made. As stated above the council does not consider that the applicant has made out the case for the change of use proposed and there is no evidence to support the breakup of the existing planning unit. 7. In addition it considers that all of the uses proposed on the site represent an over intensification of the listed building and its curtilage particularly the proposal to build three houses in part of the beer garden 8. Whilst the CPC does not support the application if SKDC were minded to support it the CPC requests that there be further consultations with regards to: a. The highway dangers which will be created by the proposals b. The problems with educational capacity in the village where the primary school is already full. c. The complete inadequacy of surface water and foul sewerage which is the subject of ongoing discussions between the Council and AWA d. The effect which the proposals have on the economic viability and sustainability of other nearby premises in the village and consequently the retention of our community services and facilities e.g. the Fish and Chip Shop is closed and the Post office is reported as having increasing problems. e. Ensuring that a condition is attached to any consent given that any housing granted under this application shall not be constructed until the other uses allowed are implemented and found to be sustainable. See paragraph 2.6 above for the reason for this.
6. Caythorpe & Frieston Parish Council (CPC) does not support the applications which have been made. As stated above the council does not consider that the applicant has made out the case for the change of use proposed and there is no evidence to support the breakup of the existing planning unit. 7. In addition it considers that all of the uses proposed on the site represent an over intensification of the listed building and its curtilage particularly the proposal to build three houses in part of the beer garden 8. Whilst the CPC does not support the application if SKDC were minded to support it the CPC requests that there be further consultations with regards to: a. The highway dangers which will be created by the proposals b. The problems with educational capacity in the village where the primary school is already full. c. The complete inadequacy of surface water and foul sewerage which is the subject of ongoing discussions between the Council and AWA d. The effect which the proposals have on the economic viability and sustainability of other nearby premises in the village and consequently the retention of our community services and facilities e.g. the Fish and Chip Shop is closed and the Post office is reported as having increasing problems. e. Ensuring that a condition is attached to any consent given that any housing granted under this application shall not be constructed until the other uses allowed are implemented and found to be sustainable. See paragraph 2.6 above for the reason for this.
27_Oct_15.docx