ensure consistency in the data collected and the whose supply chain is focused on three key extracted passages are recorded as narratives. elements: strict quality control: identify a longer term customer in need of the product, and: work with the longer term customers to IV. CATEGORISING GREEN-FIELD SUPPLY CHAIN CONCEPTS develop a strong relationship with the customers. The process of translating ideas into To narrow the actual problem, the a conceptual diagram is expressed in Fig. 4. second question of these sequences was aimed Content analysis and narrative enquiry at investigating further the activities of the was applied to advance the diagram. The data principles. The design process, indicated that analysis from interviews in (C1), is illustrated in inductive reasoning must be applied to extract a supply and demand expanded conceptual and gradually build the supply chain objectives. diagram Fig. 5. The design is detailed further in the text through The same process as in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 sample passages to present the method. has been applied on all activities and functions At this stage, the supply chain design to assess the potential for developing the decomposition process recommends grouping architecture. The ideas on the top are of higher objectives and concepts into hierarchical importance in the strategy than these on the categories started as shown in. bottom that are more tactical ideas, this has The results are demonstrated in been described as (). The ‘cascading strategy’ categories and subcategories. The categories hierarchical cascade of the ‘cascading strategy’ created are based on 4 steps: idea, focus, () enables joining smaller conceptual diagrams command, and activity. to be expanded in the larger conceptual diagram. The was applied ‘cascading strategy’ 4.1. Architecture Methodology to develop further the conceptual diagrams into larger concepts. The architecture methodology is preliminarily applied to the first company (C1) FIGURE 3. CONCEPT CATEGORIES FOR GREEN_FIELD SUPPLY CHAIN ARCHITECTURE
ensure consistency in the data collected and the extracted passages are recorded as narratives. IV. CATEGORISING GREEN-FIELD SUPPLY CHAIN CONCEPTS To narrow the actual problem, the second question of these sequences was aimed at investigating further the activities of the principles. The design process, indicated that inductive reasoning must be applied to extract and gradually build the supply chain objectives. The design is detailed further in the text through sample passages to present the method. At this stage, the supply chain design decomposition process recommends grouping objectives and concepts into hierarchical categories started as shown in. The results are demonstrated in categories and subcategories. The categories created are based on 4 steps: idea, focus, command, and activity. 4.1. Architecture Methodology The architecture methodology is preliminarily applied to the first company (C1) whose supply chain is focused on three key elements: strict quality control: identify a longer term customer in need of the product, and: work with the longer term customers to develop a strong relationship with the customers. The process of translating ideas into a conceptual diagram is expressed in Fig. 4. Content analysis and narrative enquiry was applied to advance the diagram. The data analysis from interviews in (C1), is illustrated in a supply and demand expanded conceptual diagram Fig. 5. The same process as in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 has been applied on all activities and functions to assess the potential for developing the architecture. The ideas on the top are of higher importance in the strategy than these on the bottom that are more tactical ideas, this has been described as ‘cascading strategy’ (). The hierarchical cascade of the ‘cascading strategy’ () enables joining smaller conceptual diagrams to be expanded in the larger conceptual diagram. The ‘cascading strategy’ was applied to develop further the conceptual diagrams into larger concepts. FIGURE 3. CONCEPT CATEGORIES FOR GREEN_FIELD SUPPLY CHAIN ARCHITECTURE
5%20%20JSCOM%20paper%202015%202nd%20issue%20Radanliev.docx