Organization: Name: Date: July 2015 LightingEurope Task Section Page Topic Comment Proposed change Reply to # # # study team 4 Executive 13,63 LED price projections When comparing the two summary different segments i.e. most cost efficient LED’s (lm/$) versus most energy efficient LED’s (lm/W), the ratio over the years is about 4.5. This ratio will remain stable. Example 2015: 2766lm/$ for low lm/w  and 645 lm/$ for high lm/w ratio 4.3 Taking into account that the relative cost of the LED in the lamp as part of the total BOM costs will reduce in the coming years, we expect the difference in lamp costs between lm/$ and lm/w to be a factor 2. This means that prices related to the future “professional” lm/w projections are typically a factor 2 higher than prices related to the future “consumer” lm/w projections. Your proposed price projections in task 4 are typically related to only “consumer” lm/w
Organization: LightingEurope Name: Date: July 2015 Task # Section # Page # Topic Comment Proposed change Reply to study team 4 Executive summary 13,63 LED price projections When comparing the two different segments i.e. most cost efficient LED’s (lm/$) versus most energy efficient LED’s (lm/W), the ratio over the years is about 4.5. This ratio will remain stable. Example 2015: 2766lm/$ for low lm/w and 645 lm/$ for high lm/w  ratio 4.3 Taking into account that the relative cost of the LED in the lamp as part of the total BOM costs will reduce in the coming years, we expect the difference in lamp costs between lm/$ and lm/w to be a factor 2. This means that prices related to the future “professional” lm/w projections are typically a factor 2 higher than prices related to the future “consumer” lm/w projections. Your proposed price projections in task 4 are typically related to only “consumer” lm/w
2nd%20Stakeholder%20comments%20from%20LE%20%20-%2020150710%20-%20addition.docx