what level of GHG-free procurement (if any) may be needed to offset the retirement of Diablo Canyon. D1801022, p. Ordering Paragraphs 2, 3, See also and 4 of D1801022, which deny PG&E's specific proposals for replacement procurement and order that replacement procurement will be addressed in the IRP proceeding or a proceeding designated by the IRP proceeding. D1801022 at p.59-60. 5. Cost Allocation Issue Citation to WEM's Work: Verified WEM presented Testimony Attachment 1 to WEM See critiquing PG&E's cost Testimony, "Clean Energy allocation proposal, Replacement for California's specifically that costs of Retiring Nuclear Plants", Diablo replacement energy (submitted 1-27-17 and entered into be passed on to CCA the record as WEM-1 on 4-19-17) customers through at pp. 28-29. charges. Citation to D1801022: On February 27, 2017, PGE "On February 27, 2017, PG&E notified the parties by e-mail notified the parties that it was that, "[A]fter careful review withdrawing its request for two of of the important feedback the three tranches of replacement provided by parties in their procurement (and associated cost January 27, 2017 opening recovery) that it had proposed in its testimony on the Diablo application D1801022 at p. 5. …" Canyon replacement proposal, PG&E is withdrawing the Diablo Canyon Tranches #2 and #3 replacement proposals, as well as the proposal to implement the Clean Energy Charge to recover the costs associated with Tranches #2 and #3." D1801022 verifies PG&E's withdrawal of cost recovery
what level of GHG-free procurement (if any) may be needed to offset the retirement of Diablo Canyon. D1801022, p. See also Ordering Paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 of D1801022, which deny PG&E's specific proposals for replacement procurement and order that replacement procurement will be addressed in the IRP proceeding or a proceeding designated by the IRP proceeding. D1801022 at p.59-60. 5. Cost Allocation Issue WEM presented Testimony critiquing PG&E's cost allocation proposal, specifically that costs of Diablo replacement energy be passed on to CCA customers through charges. On February 27, 2017, PGE notified the parties by e-mail that, "[A]fter careful review of the important feedback provided by parties in their January 27, 2017 opening testimony on the Diablo Canyon replacement proposal, PG&E is withdrawing the Diablo Canyon Tranches #2 and #3 replacement proposals, as well as the proposal to implement the Clean Energy Charge to recover the costs associated with Tranches #2 and #3." D1801022 verifies PG&E's withdrawal of cost recovery Citation to WEM's Work: See Attachment 1 to WEM Testimony, "Clean Energy Replacement for California's Retiring Nuclear Plants", (submitted 1-27-17 and entered into the record as WEM-1 on 4-19-17) at pp. 28-29. Citation to D1801022: "On February 27, 2017, PG&E notified the parties that it was withdrawing its request for two of the three tranches of replacement procurement (and associated cost recovery) that it had proposed in its application …" D1801022 at p. 5. Verified
218186775.docx