Annex 1: Capacity Development Scorecard Project/Programme Name: Integrating global environmental priorities into national policies and programmes Project/Programme Cycle Phase: Project preparation (PPG) Date: April 2014 Capacity Result / Outcome Staged Indicators Rating Score Comments Next Steps Indicator Contribution CR 1: Capacities for engagement Indicator 1 Degree of Institutional responsibilities for Institutional responsibilities for managing the – legitimacy/mandate of environmental management are not 0 environment exist but overlaps exist and lead environmental clearly defined stakeholders do not know/recognized these organizations responsibilities. Institutional responsibilities for environmental management are 1 No direct identified contribution from Authority and legitimacy of all lead the project to 1 organizations responsible for improve this 2 environmental management are capacity. partially recognized by stakeholders Authority and legitimacy of all lead organizations responsible for 3 environmental management recognized by stakeholders Indicator 2 Existence No co-management mechanisms are in Only few co-managements exist and more are – 0 of operational place needed to increase collaboration among agencies. Some co-management mechanisms are 1 No direct mechanisms in place and operational contribution from Some co-management mechanisms are 1 the project to formally established through 2 improve this agreements, MOUs, etc. capacity. Comprehensive co-management mechanisms are formally established 3 and are operational/functional Indicator 3 Existence Identification of stakeholders and their The participation of stakeholders in – of cooperation with participation/involvement in 0 regarding the management of the stakeholder groups is poor environment is limited in Kiribati. Stakeholders are identified but their participation in decision-making is 1 No direct limited contribution from the project to Stakeholders are identified and regular 1 improve this consultations mechanisms are 2 capacity. established Stakeholders are identified and they actively contribute to established 3 participative decision-making processes
Annex 1: Capacity Development Scorecard Project/Programme Name: Integrating global environmental priorities into national policies and programmes Project/Programme Cycle Phase: Project preparation (PPG) Date: April 2014 Capacity Result / Indicator Staged Indicators Rating Score Comments Next Steps Outcome Contribution CR 1: Capacities for engagement Indicator 1 – Degree of legitimacy/mandate of lead environmental organizations Institutional responsibilities for environmental management are not clearly defined 0 1 Institutional responsibilities for managing the environment exist but overlaps exist and stakeholders do not know/recognized these responsibilities. No direct contribution from the project to improve this capacity. Institutional responsibilities for environmental management are identified 1 Authority and legitimacy of all lead organizations responsible for environmental management are partially recognized by stakeholders 2 Authority and legitimacy of all lead organizations responsible for environmental management recognized by stakeholders 3 Indicator 2 – Existence of operational mechanisms No co-management mechanisms are in place 0 1 Only few co-managements exist and more are needed to increase collaboration among agencies. No direct contribution from the project to improve this capacity. Some co-management mechanisms are in place and operational 1 Some co-management mechanisms are formally established through agreements, MOUs, etc. 2 Comprehensive co-management mechanisms are formally established and are operational/functional 3 Indicator 3 – Existence of cooperation with stakeholder groups Identification of stakeholders and their participation/involvement in is poor 0 1 The participation of stakeholders in regarding the management of the environment is limited in Kiribati. No direct contribution from the project to improve this capacity. Stakeholders are identified but their participation in decision-making is limited 1 Stakeholders are identified and regular consultations mechanisms are established 2 Stakeholders are identified and they actively contribute to established participative decision-making processes 3
4936_CCCD_Kiribati_ProDoc%2030%20Jun%202014-1_v0.docx