MS Involvement and support of governmental institutions S Overall stakeholder participation Assessment of Outcomes MU Outcome 1: Karst and peatland needs integrated in the BiH cantonal spatial planning policies and procedures MS Outcome 2: Water use and mining policies in BiH reflect karst and peatland biodiversity conservation requirements MU Overall Project Outcome Rating (Effectiveness) Overall Project Results MU Sustainability ML Financial Resources ML Socio-political ML Institutional Framework and Governance Environmental ML ML Overall Likelihood of Sustainability Progress Toward Impact Environmental Status Improvement N Environmental Stress Reduction M Progress Towards Stress/Status Change M Overall Project Performance Rating S Ratings for Outcomes, Effectiveness, Sustainability Ratings Relevance Ratings Efficiency, M&E, Implementation and Execution 4. Likely (L): negligible risks to 2. Relevant (R) sustainability 1. Not relevant (NR) 6: Highly Satisfactory (HS): no 3. Moderately Likely (ML): shortcomings moderate risks Impact Ratings 5: Satisfactory (S): minor 2. Moderately Unlikely (MU): 3. Significant (S): Large-scale shortcomings significant risks impacts 4: Moderately Satisfactory (MS): 1. Unlikely (U): severe risks 2. Minimal (M): Site-based impacts moderate shortcomings 1. Negligible (N): Little or no 3. Moderately Unsatisfactory (MU): impacts significant shortcomings 2. Unsatisfactory (U): major problems 1. Highly Unsatisfactory (HU): severe problems Additional ratings where appropriate Not Applicable (N/A) Unable to Assess (U/A)
Involvement and support of governmental institutions MS Overall stakeholder participation S Assessment of Outcomes Outcome 1: Karst and peatland needs integrated in the BiH cantonal spatial planning policies and procedures MU Outcome 2: Water use and mining policies in BiH reflect karst and peatland biodiversity conservation requirements MS Overall Project Outcome Rating (Effectiveness) MU Overall Project Results MU Sustainability Financial Resources ML Socio-political ML Institutional Framework and Governance ML Environmental ML Overall Likelihood of Sustainability ML Progress Toward Impact Environmental Status Improvement N Environmental Stress Reduction M Progress Towards Stress/Status Change M Overall Project Performance Rating S Ratings for Outcomes, Effectiveness, Efficiency, M&E, Implementation and Execution 6: Highly Satisfactory (HS): no shortcomings 5: Satisfactory (S): minor shortcomings 4: Moderately Satisfactory (MS): moderate shortcomings 3. Moderately Unsatisfactory (MU): significant shortcomings 2. Unsatisfactory (U): major problems 1. Highly Unsatisfactory (HU): severe problems Sustainability Ratings 4. Likely (L): negligible risks to sustainability 3. Moderately Likely (ML): moderate risks 2. Moderately Unlikely (MU): significant risks 1. Unlikely (U): severe risks Relevance Ratings 2. Relevant (R) 1. Not relevant (NR) Impact Ratings 3. Significant (S): Large-scale impacts 2. Minimal (M): Site-based impacts 1. Negligible (N): Little or no impacts Additional ratings where appropriate Not Applicable (N/A) Unable to Assess (U/A)
2723_UNDP_TE_Terminal_Evaluation_Report_Karst_July_2013.docx