farmers using PPE. TBD and disposal practices. after baseline survey. Sub-grantees M=Continuous Grants contain IPM and Workplan, page 3: Promotion or Use of If pesticide inputs might be report to ATT R=Annually safe pesticide use “..developing public non-EPA registered promoted, it would likely be Grants Manager language as institutions’ and private pesticides, certain RUP done through sub-grantees recommended by businesses’ capacities pesticides working with agrodealers. PERSUAP to introduce new Thus sub-grantee grant Promotion or Use of No PERSUAP rejected technologies and language would contain banned pesticides pesticides promoted or supply agricultural wording on which pesticides Preventive used with AID resources inputs in collaboration might be supported, as part Integrated Preventive IPM tools with other of IPM, and which cannot be Pest Management (IPM) and tactics understood stakeholders” supported in any way. inputs (tools/tactics) and used for maize, rice The word “inputs” can Sub-grantees to perform not known, or and soybean target include pesticides; it training on IPM tools and understood, or used farmers can also include tactics recommended in the Training records preventive PERSUAP, including maintained. Integrated pesticides, as well as Baseline: ..% of target Pest Management pesticide use safety. farmers using (IPM) tools/tactics unregistered, rejected, or banned pesticide. TBD after baseline survey.
and disposal practices. farmers using PPE. TBD after baseline survey. Workplan, page 3: “..developing public institutions’ and private businesses’ capacities to introduce new technologies and supply agricultural inputs in collaboration with other stakeholders” The word “inputs” can include pesticides; it can also include preventive Integrated Pest Management (IPM) tools/tactics Promotion or Use of non-EPA registered pesticides, certain RUP pesticides Promotion or Use of banned pesticides Preventive Integrated Pest Management (IPM) inputs (tools/tactics) not known, or understood, or used If pesticide inputs might be promoted, it would likely be done through sub-grantees working with agrodealers. Thus sub-grantee grant language would contain wording on which pesticides might be supported, as part of IPM, and which cannot be supported in any way. Sub-grantees to perform training on IPM tools and tactics recommended in the PERSUAP, including pesticides, as well as pesticide use safety. Grants contain IPM and safe pesticide use language as recommended by PERSUAP No PERSUAP rejected pesticides promoted or used with AID resources Preventive IPM tools and tactics understood and used for maize, rice and soybean target farmers Training records maintained. Baseline: ..% of target farmers using unregistered, rejected, or banned pesticide. TBD after baseline survey. Sub-grantees report to ATT Grants Manager M=Continuous R=Annually
39950.docx