The government continues to fulfill its international commitments Public states higher Public and 50% of Members of Surveys of decision-makers Risk: awareness of are not aware Parliament are aware Socio-economic pressures Citations in newspapers and other environmental about existing about existence of do not de-value media information products environmental easily accessible environmental attitudes References in brochures, information environmental and concern pamphlets, flyers, etc. information at ECD Assumption: Survey results will show an increased awareness and understanding of the Rio Conventions’ implementation for decision-makers COMPONENT 2.0: ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS AND COMPLIANCE SYSTEM (CMS) Outcome 2: A Compliance Adequate The existing set of Set of environmental List of official environmental Risk: Monitoring System (CMS) environmental environmental indicators in place indicators monitored by relevant New indicators are developed and tracking key indicators monitored indicators is not and responds to institutions adopted but they require environmental indicators. comprehensive and national and additional resources to be Final Evaluation report does not respond to international monitored; which might State of environment report and Output 2.1: An the information information not be available National communications/reports institutionalized set of requirements requirements Assumption: environmental indicators. The government pursues its budget support to integrate Output 2.2: An operational the 3 Rio Conventions compliance monitoring obligations into the Kiribati system. information management approach and monitoring system Adequate national There is no unified set Adequate official List of official standards, norms Risk: standards, norms, of standards, norms standards, norms and and procedures New standards, norms and procedures for and procedures to procedures are in procedures are identified Assessment reports monitoring these collect data, conduct place and use by the but might not be adopted Final Evaluation report environmental observations and make relevant institutions by the Government indicators are officially sampling Assumption: in place The government pursues its policies to integrate the 3 Rio Conventions obligations into the Kiribati information management approach and monitoring system
The government continues to fulfill its international commitments Public states higher awareness of environmental information products Public and are not aware about existing environmental information 50% of Members of Parliament are aware about existence of easily accessible environmental information at ECD Surveys of decision-makers Citations in newspapers and other media References in brochures, pamphlets, flyers, etc. Risk: Socio-economic pressures do not de-value environmental attitudes and concern Assumption: Survey results will show an increased awareness and understanding of the Rio Conventions’ implementation for decision-makers COMPONENT 2.0: ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS AND COMPLIANCE SYSTEM (CMS) Outcome 2: A Compliance Monitoring System (CMS) developed and tracking key environmental indicators. Output 2.1: An institutionalized set of environmental indicators. Output 2.2: An operational compliance monitoring system. Adequate environmental indicators monitored The existing set of environmental indicators is not comprehensive and does not respond to the information requirements Set of environmental indicators in place and responds to national and international information requirements List of official environmental indicators monitored by relevant institutions Final Evaluation report State of environment report and National communications/reports Risk: New indicators are adopted but they require additional resources to be monitored; which might not be available Assumption: The government pursues its budget support to integrate the 3 Rio Conventions obligations into the Kiribati information management approach and monitoring system Adequate national standards, norms, procedures for monitoring these environmental indicators are officially in place There is no unified set of standards, norms and procedures to collect data, conduct observations and make sampling Adequate official standards, norms and procedures are in place and use by the relevant institutions List of official standards, norms and procedures Assessment reports Final Evaluation report Risk: New standards, norms and procedures are identified but might not be adopted by the Government Assumption: The government pursues its policies to integrate the 3 Rio Conventions obligations into the Kiribati information management approach and monitoring system
4936_CCCD_Kiribati_ProDoc%2030%20Jun%202014-1_v0.docx