Microbial; USEPA WHO Not listed Requested Metarhizium anisopliae registered strains; microbial EPA 3 except Metarhizium anisopliae strain F52 spores (all GUPs) blast biological termiticide is EPA 2 Metarhizium anisopliae, var. Anisopliae, strain ESF1 (included for review under FTFT-MnM) Pyrethrins Botanical; USEPA WHO II; EPA 3 Requested registered; Pyrethrins + Garlic Botanical; USEPA WHO II; EPA 3 Requested extracts registered + exempt Neem (Azadirachtin) Botanical; USEPA WHO not listed; EPA Requested registered (GUPs) 3 Spinosad Microbial (Spinosyn), WHO U Requested (included for review under macrocyclic lactone; EPA 3 or 0-No signal FTFT-MnM) USEPA registered (all GUPs word, 1 is EPA 1 ) spp.: Microbial; USEPA WHO not listed; EPA Requested Trichoderma registered strains; No consensus value Trichoderma gamsii (formerly & T. viride) T. harzianum The pesticides in Table 1 were chosen based on the following criteria: of the pesticide for the proposed application is a prime consideration and every effort Effectiveness was made to select the least toxic chemicals that simultaneously provide maximum effectiveness in controlling pest infestations and achieving the activity’s goals. When pesticides are needed to control a pest population outbreak, FTFT-MnM Low Toxicity: agronomists and technicians first recommend the least toxic option and then a stronger chemical, only if needed to effectively control the infestation. Registered for use in Tanzania and available at reasonable cost Registered for use by the USEPA (also see Factor F) To minimize the risk of resistance Cost-effectiveness Primarily, pesticides requested in this PERSUAP were selected based on their appropriateness and effectiveness for the target pest, disease or weed, and on the ability of FTFT-MnM technicians and partners
Metarhizium anisopliae Metarhizium anisopliae strain F52 spores Metarhizium anisopliae, var. Anisopliae, strain ESF1 (included for review under FTFT-MnM) Microbial; USEPA registered strains; microbial (all GUPs) WHO Not listed EPA 3 except biological termiticide is EPA 2 Requested Pyrethrins Botanical; USEPA registered; WHO II; EPA 3 Requested Pyrethrins + Garlic extracts Botanical; USEPA registered + exempt WHO II; EPA 3 Requested Neem (Azadirachtin) Botanical; USEPA registered (GUPs) WHO not listed; EPA 3 Requested Spinosad (included for review under FTFT-MnM) Microbial (Spinosyn), macrocyclic lactone; USEPA registered (all GUPs ) WHO U EPA 3 or 0-No signal word, 1 is EPA 1 Requested Trichoderma spp.: Trichoderma gamsii (formerly T. viride) & T. harzianum Microbial; USEPA registered strains; WHO not listed; EPA No consensus value Requested The pesticides in Table 1 were chosen based on the following criteria: Effectiveness of the pesticide for the proposed application is a prime consideration and every effort was made to select the least toxic chemicals that simultaneously provide maximum effectiveness in controlling pest infestations and achieving the activity’s goals. Low Toxicity: When pesticides are needed to control a pest population outbreak, FTFT-MnM agronomists and technicians first recommend the least toxic option and then a stronger chemical, only if needed to effectively control the infestation. Registered for use in Tanzania and available at reasonable cost Registered for use by the USEPA To minimize the risk of resistance (also see Factor F) Cost-effectiveness Primarily, pesticides requested in this PERSUAP were selected based on their appropriateness and effectiveness for the target pest, disease or weed, and on the ability of FTFT-MnM technicians and partners blast
50646.docx