B 2 20% 4 8 Example 5 Total Calculation of Weighted Scores and Ranking Total Quality Total Weighted Supplier Weighted Score Score Rank Position A 96 96 1 B 88 88 2 Evaluation Methodology The Evaluators will initially score independently using agreed evaluation Chamber’s guidelines. Once they have completed their independent marking they will attend a consensus meeting to discuss, understand and agree the overall weighted score for each answer provided by the supplier/contractor. This will be reached by adding together each individual Evaluators overall weighted score for each question. The highest overall weighted score for all 6 questions will being ranked first. Example 6 Combined Calculation of Weighted Scores and Ranking (based on ALL Evaluators scores) Overall Overall Total Overall Weighted Weighted Overall Ranked Weighted Score Score Weighted Position Score Supplier (Evaluator 2) (Evaluator 3) Score (Evaluator 1) A 100 90 92 282 1 B 92 100 76 268 2 Award The contract will be awarded to the supplier/contractor ranked first based on the agreed overall score at the consensus meeting. A service contract will be provided to the successful supplier/contractor prior to business support commencing. Unsuccessful bidders will be notified of their ranking with an opportunity for feedback on request. Submission Format/Information Information, which must form part of the submission, is detailed in the checklist provided at the end of this document. This checklist has been provided in good faith to assist suppliers/contractors, but it is solely the responsibility to ensure that all suppliers/contractors’ relevant documents are completed and returned as instructed. PART 1 MANDATORY INFORMATION – 1. Supplier Information (For Information Only) – 1.1 Supplier Details 1.1.a Full name of the Supplier completing the document
B 2 20% 4 8 Example 5 Total Calculation of Weighted Scores and Ranking Supplier Total Quality Weighted Score Total Weighted Score Rank Position A 96 96 1 B 88 88 2 Evaluation Methodology The Chamber’s Evaluators will initially score independently using agreed evaluation guidelines. Once they have completed their independent marking they will attend a consensus meeting to discuss, understand and agree the overall weighted score for each answer provided by the supplier/contractor. This will be reached by adding together each individual Evaluators overall weighted score for each question. The highest overall weighted score for all 6 questions will being ranked first. Example 6 Combined Calculation of Weighted Scores and Ranking (based on ALL Evaluators scores) Supplier Overall Weighted Score (Evaluator 1) Overall Weighted Score (Evaluator 2) Overall Weighted Score (Evaluator 3) Total Overall Weighted Score Ranked Position A 100 90 92 282 1 B 92 100 76 268 2 Award The contract will be awarded to the supplier/contractor ranked first based on the agreed overall score at the consensus meeting. A service contract will be provided to the successful supplier/contractor prior to business support commencing. Unsuccessful bidders will be notified of their ranking with an opportunity for feedback on request. Submission Format/Information Information, which must form part of the submission, is detailed in the checklist provided at the end of this document. This checklist has been provided in good faith to assist suppliers/contractors, but it is solely the suppliers/contractors’ responsibility to ensure that all relevant documents are completed and returned as instructed. PART 1 – MANDATORY INFORMATION 1. Supplier Information – (For Information Only) 1.1 Supplier Details 1.1.a Full name of the Supplier completing the document
261016FINALEnterpriseHubDevelopmentandEngagementSpecialistRFQdownload.docx