Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.18-01-022 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: January 16, 2018 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: March 15, 2018 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes Additional Comments on Part I: # CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Comment(s) 5. of Noted A4NR’s current Articles Incorporation and Bylaws establishing its customer status were attached to its Notice of Intent to Claim Intervenor Compensation in this proceeding. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION: Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Claimed Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Contribution(s) Claimed Contribution(s) 1. A4NR was one of contributions to the record Verified A4NR’s several Joint Parties that regarding, and the Commission’s negotiated the terms and disposition of, request to PG&E’s conditions of the Joint retire DCNPP are reflected in Proposal presented in the at pp.1 to 4, Application 16-08-006, PG&E application. and 7 to 8, and Attachment A (Joint Notably, as the primary Proposal, at p. 12); also, Decision critic of 16-12-045, at pp. 7 to 8, in PG&E’s seismic re-evaluation of DCNPP, Application 14-02-008 (re Joint A4NR agreed in the Joint Motion of Pacific Gas and Electric Proposal to withdraw its Company (U 39 E) and the Alliance pending objections and for Nuclear Responsibility to Set recommendations Aside Submission and Reopen the regarding (July 27, Record Under Rule 13.14 PG&E’s recovery of costs in the 2016), and Protest of the Alliance Diablo Canyon Seismic for Nuclear Responsibility Studies Balancing Account (September 14, 2016), at pp.2 to 3); in 2014 and 2015 Prepared Direct Testimony of the PG&E’s ERRA proceedings Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility
Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.18-01-022 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: January 16, 2018 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: March 15, 2018 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes Additional Comments on Part I: # Intervenor’s Comment(s) CPUC Discussion 5. A4NR’s current Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws establishing its customer status were attached to its Notice of Intent to Claim Intervenor Compensation in this proceeding. Noted PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION: Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion 1. A4NR was one of several Joint Parties that negotiated the terms and conditions of the Joint Proposal presented in the PG&E application. Notably, as the primary critic of PG&E’s seismic re-evaluation of DCNPP, A4NR agreed in the Joint Proposal to withdraw its pending objections and recommendations regarding PG&E’s recovery of costs in the Diablo Canyon Seismic Studies Balancing Account in PG&E’s 2014 and 2015 ERRA proceedings A4NR’s contributions to the record regarding, and the Commission’s disposition of, PG&E’s request to retire DCNPP are reflected in Application 16-08-006, at pp.1 to 4, and 7 to 8, and Attachment A (Joint Proposal, at p. 12); also, Decision 16-12-045, at pp. 7 to 8, in Application 14-02-008 (re Joint Motion of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 E) and the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility to Set Aside Submission and Reopen the Record Under Rule 13.14 (July 27, 2016), and Protest of the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility (September 14, 2016), at pp.2 to 3); Prepared Direct Testimony of the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility Verified
236850988.docx