writing with the assessment of impacts; the proposed measures to minimize harm; and the mitigation necessary to preserve, rehabilitate and enhance those features and values of the Section 4(f) property; and that such measures will result in a net benefit to the Section 4(f) property. X 6. If Federal funds have been used in the acquisition or improvements or of the 4(f) site, the land conversion/transfer has been coordinated with the appropriate Federal agency, and they are in agreement with NA the land conversion or transfer. Documentation is attached YES NO Alternatives Considered 1. The "Do Nothing" alternative has been evaluated and is considered X not to be feasible and prudent because it would neither address nor correct the transportation need that necessitated the project. 2. An alternative has been evaluated to improve the transportation X facility in a manner that addresses the and need project’s purpose without use of the Section 4(f) property and is considered not to be feasible and prudent. 3. An alternative has been evaluated to build the transportation X facility at a location that does not require use for the Section 4(f) property and is considered not to be feasible and prudent. Mitigation and Measures to Minimize Harm YES NO 1. The proposed action includes all possible planning to minimize X harm. 2. Mitigation measures include one or more of the following: (Check applicable mitigation measures.) Replacement of lands used with lands of reasonably equivalent usefulness and location, and of at least comparable value. Replacement of facilities impacted by the project including sidewalks, paths, benches, lights, trees, and other facilities. Restoration and landscaping of disturbed areas.
writing with the assessment of impacts; the proposed measures to minimize harm; and the mitigation necessary to preserve, rehabilitate and enhance those features and values of the Section 4(f) property; and that such measures will result in a net benefit to the Section 4(f) property. 6. If Federal funds have been used in the acquisition or improvements of the 4(f) site, the land conversion/transfer has been coordinated with the appropriate Federal agency, and they are in agreement with the land conversion or transfer. Documentation is attached X or NA Alternatives Considered YES NO 1. The "Do Nothing" alternative has been evaluated and is considered not to be feasible and prudent because it would neither address nor correct the transportation need that necessitated the project. X 2. An alternative has been evaluated to improve the transportation facility in a manner that addresses the project’s purpose and need without use of the Section 4(f) property and is considered not to be feasible and prudent. X 3. An alternative has been evaluated to build the transportation facility at a location that does not require use for the Section 4(f) property and is considered not to be feasible and prudent. X Mitigation and Measures to Minimize Harm YES NO 1. The proposed action includes all possible planning to minimize harm. X 2. Mitigation measures include one or more of the following: (Check applicable mitigation measures.) Replacement of lands used with lands of reasonably equivalent usefulness and location, and of at least comparable value. Replacement of facilities impacted by the project including sidewalks, paths, benches, lights, trees, and other facilities. Restoration and landscaping of disturbed areas.
4f-net-benefit.docx