CR 5: Capacities to monitor and evaluate Indicator 14 Irregular project monitoring is being done Monitoring is undertaken within the The project will include a data – Adequacy of the without an adequate monitoring framework construct of externally funded tracking system, which will be 0 0 project/programme detailing what and how to monitor the programmes and projects, but not institutionalized within the monitoring process particular project or programme systematically within corporate construct of the EMIS programmes due to insufficient An adequate resourced monitoring resource, in particular financial and framework is in place but project monitoring 1 technical. is irregularly conducted Regular participative monitoring of results in 2 being conducted but this information is only 2 partially used by the project/programme implementation team Monitoring information is produced timely and accurately and is used by the 3 implementation team to learn and possibly to change the course of action Indicator 15 None or ineffective evaluations are being There are limited examples of an Part of the training on the use of – Adequacy of the conducted without an adequate evaluation 0 0 adequate project/programme the EMIS will include how to project/programme plan; including the necessary resources monitoring and evaluation in place in use data and information to monitoring and PNG. PNG has implemented assess trends and progress to An adequate evaluation plan is in place but evaluation process numerous environmental information policy decisions. evaluation activities are irregularly 1 programmes/project since ratifying the The learn-by-doing exercises conducted Rio Conventions, however, there is a will help government staff Evaluations are being conducted as per an lack of will to revisit those efforts and engaging in them to think adequate evaluation plan but the evaluation 2 1, 2 learn from those experiences. critically. results are only partially used by the project/programme implementation team Effective evaluations are conducted timely and accurately and are used by the implementation team and the Agencies and 3 GEF Staff to correct the course of action if needed and to learn for further planning activities
CR 5: Capacities to monitor and evaluate Indicator 14 – Adequacy of the project/programme monitoring process Irregular project monitoring is being done without an adequate monitoring framework detailing what and how to monitor the particular project or programme 0 0 Monitoring is undertaken within the construct of externally funded programmes and projects, but not systematically within corporate programmes due to insufficient resource, in particular financial and technical. The project will include a data tracking system, which will be institutionalized within the construct of the EMIS 2 An adequate resourced monitoring framework is in place but project monitoring is irregularly conducted 1 Regular participative monitoring of results in being conducted but this information is only partially used by the project/programme implementation team 2 Monitoring information is produced timely and accurately and is used by the implementation team to learn and possibly to change the course of action 3 Indicator 15 – Adequacy of the project/programme monitoring and evaluation process None or ineffective evaluations are being conducted without an adequate evaluation plan; including the necessary resources 0 0 There are limited examples of an adequate project/programme monitoring and evaluation in place in PNG. PNG has implemented numerous environmental programmes/project since ratifying the Rio Conventions, however, there is a lack of will to revisit those efforts and learn from those experiences. Part of the training on the use of the EMIS will include how to use data and information to assess trends and progress to information policy decisions. The learn-by-doing exercises will help government staff engaging in them to think critically. 1, 2 An adequate evaluation plan is in place but evaluation activities are irregularly conducted 1 Evaluations are being conducted as per an adequate evaluation plan but the evaluation results are only partially used by the project/programme implementation team 2 Effective evaluations are conducted timely and accurately and are used by the implementation team and the Agencies and GEF Staff to correct the course of action if needed and to learn for further planning activities 3
3-17-14__Papua_New_Guinea_5178_Project_Doc__PNG_ProDoc_0.docx