s. 57D (a) that the person is the owner or occupier of a specified premises; and (b) that on a specified date or dates— (i) there was a sign or marking on or near a door of that premises that stated "No Advertising Material" or "No Junk Mail" or other specified words indicating that advertising material was not to be deposited in that receptacle, slot or place; and (ii) that that sign or marking was clearly visible to a person depositing an item under that door; and (c) that on that date, or on one of those dates, (as the case may be) specified material was deposited under that door— is evidence of those matters. (3) However, a statutory declaration is not admissible as evidence under this section in any proceeding unless— (a) a copy of the statutory declaration was S. 57D(3)(a) amended by served on the accused at least 21 days before No. 68/2009 the proceeding together with a statement— s. 97(Sch. item 50.23). (i) that the certificate is to be used as evidence at the proceeding; and S. 57D(3)(a)(ii) (ii) that the accused has the right to require amended by the prosecution to call as a witness the No. 68/2009 person who made the statutory s. 97(Sch. item 50.23). declaration, and that the accused must exercise that right if the accused wishes to dispute any statement contained in the statutory declaration; and
(a) that the person is the owner or occupier of a specified premises; and (b) that on a specified date or dates— (i) there was a sign or marking on or near a door of that premises that stated "No Advertising Material" or "No Junk Mail" or other specified words indicating that advertising material was not to be deposited in that receptacle, slot or place; and (ii) that that sign or marking was clearly visible to a person depositing an item under that door; and (c) that on that date, or on one of those dates, (as the case may be) specified material was deposited under that door— is evidence of those matters. s. 57D (3) However, a statutory declaration is not admissible as evidence under this section in any proceeding unless— S. 57D(3)(a) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 50.23). (a) a copy of the statutory declaration was served on the accused at least 21 days before the proceeding together with a statement— (i) that the certificate is to be used as evidence at the proceeding; and S. 57D(3)(a)(ii) amended by No. 68/2009 s. 97(Sch. item 50.23). (ii) that the accused has the right to require the prosecution to call as a witness the person who made the statutory declaration, and that the accused must exercise that right if the accused wishes to dispute any statement contained in the statutory declaration; and
70-8056a188.docx