consistency in the market for portfolio) consumers and other market TURN PHC Statement, Jan. 26, actors, (b) maximize 2015, pp. 4-5 (advocating the effective efficiency and inclusion in Phase II the expanded opportunities to adoption of a new “rolling capture efficiency potential, (c) framework for portfolio” rely on energy efficiency in portfolio planning, review, and planning, and (d) improve management); p. 10 (explaining upon the existing evaluation, that the summary of the joint measurement and verification proposal under development by process. The second letter, the coalition was attached to dated September 18, 2013, PHC Statement) NRDC’s presented the groups’ recommendations that the Administrative Law Judge’s forthcoming OIR include clear Ruling Regarding Comments on steps for developing a record to issued Phase II Workshop 1, support transitioning to a (workshop presentations rolling portfolio approach. developed by the coalition, including TURN, were attached to this ruling) The Commission issued its Order Initiating Rulemaking TURN Cmts on Phase II 13-11-005 shortly thereafter, Workshop 1, 4/6/15 which encouraged parties to collaborate through informal TURN Cmts on Rolling Staff’s stakeholder forums to submit a Portfolio Whitepaper, 5/26/15 joint proposal or party proposals for a “Rolling filing and review Portfolio” process in Phase II of the proceeding. The coalition convened by TURN and NRDC commenced work on developing a joint proposal for transitioning to a rolling portfolio system to present in Phase II. This work was conducted through six subgroups, a steering committee called the the “Coordinating Committee,” “Funding Authorization” subgroup, the “Technical” subgroup, the “Portfolio subgroup, the Refresh” “Stakeholder Engagement” subgroup, and the “Reporting”
consistency in the market for consumers and other market actors, (b) maximize efficiency and expanded opportunities to capture efficiency potential, (c) rely on energy efficiency in planning, and (d) improve upon the existing evaluation, measurement and verification process. The second letter, dated September 18, 2013, presented the groups’ recommendations that the forthcoming OIR include clear steps for developing a record to support transitioning to a rolling portfolio approach. The Commission issued its Order Initiating Rulemaking 13-11-005 shortly thereafter, which encouraged parties to collaborate through informal stakeholder forums to submit a joint proposal or party proposals for a “Rolling Portfolio” filing and review process in Phase II of the proceeding. The coalition convened by TURN and NRDC commenced work on developing a joint proposal for transitioning to a rolling portfolio system to present in Phase II. This work was conducted through six subgroups, a steering committee called the “Coordinating Committee,” the “Funding Authorization” subgroup, the “Technical” subgroup, the “Portfolio Refresh” subgroup, the “Stakeholder Engagement” subgroup, and the “Reporting” portfolio) TURN PHC Statement, Jan. 26, 2015, pp. 4-5 (advocating the inclusion in Phase II the adoption of a new “rolling portfolio” framework for portfolio planning, review, and management); p. 10 (explaining that the summary of the joint proposal under development by the coalition was attached to NRDC’s PHC Statement) Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Regarding Comments on Phase II Workshop 1, issued (workshop presentations developed by the coalition, including TURN, were attached to this ruling) TURN Cmts on Phase II Workshop 1, 4/6/15 TURN Cmts on Staff’s Rolling Portfolio Whitepaper, 5/26/15 effective
212622197.docx