Reflect on how genre conventions, features and strategies help shape and reveal the values, goals, and agenda of discourse communities. Write Work through careful revision and editing based on peer and teacher feedback and the own review of and reflection on a draft. student’s Minimum Requirements: 4-5 pages (double spaced, standard, 12-point font, 1-inch margins) Identify, analyze, and reflect on two peer-reviewed journal articles as described in the assignment prompt MLA or APA Style Due Date(s) For Major Project Milestones: Select and summarize two texts (two pages single spaced) Week 3: Submit a 2-3 page draft to instructor for written feedback Week 4: Submit final 4-5 page paper Week 5: Suggested Unit Readings: Genre 62.3 (2000): 335-360. Web. College English. Bawarshi, Anis. “The Function.” of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the College Carter, Michael. “Ways Disciplines.” 58.3 (2007): 385-418. Web. Composition and Communication Connors, Robert. of Citation Systems, Part II: Competing Epistemic Values in “The Rhetoric 17.2 (1999): 219-245. Web. Rhetoric Review. Citation.” Devitt, Amy J., Anis Bawarshi, and Mary Jo Reiff. "Materiality and Genre in the Study of Discourse Communities." 65.5 (2003): 541. College English Grant-Davie, Keith. "Rhetorical Situations and Their Constituents." Rhetoric Review 15.2 (1997): 264-79. JSTOR. Web. Haas, Christina, and Linda Flower. "Rhetorical Reading Strategies and the Construction of Meaning." 39.2 (1988): 167-183. College Composition and Communication MacDonald, Susan for Analyzing Sentence-Level Differences in Peck. “A Method 9.4 (1992): 533-569. Written Communication. Disciplinary Knowledge Making.” Web. as 70 (1984): 151-167. Quarterly Journal of Speech. Miller, Carolyn. “Genre Social Action.” Web. The Wadsworth Guide to Research Chapter 2: Writing Processes Chapter 4: Finding Resources Through Secondary Research Chapter 6: Rhetorically Reading, Tracking, and Evaluating Resources Grading: (Adapt this section to articulate your class policies) Your work will be evaluated according to the following criteria: Excellent Acceptable Emerging Not Evident
Reflect on how genre conventions, features and strategies help shape and reveal the values, goals, and agenda of discourse communities. Write Work through careful revision and editing based on peer and teacher feedback and the student’s own review of and reflection on a draft. Minimum Requirements: 4-5 pages (double spaced, standard, 12-point font, 1-inch margins) Identify, analyze, and reflect on two peer-reviewed journal articles as described in the assignment prompt MLA or APA Style Due Date(s) For Major Project Milestones: Week 3: Select and summarize two texts (two pages single spaced) Week 4: Submit a 2-3 page draft to instructor for written feedback Week 5: Submit final 4-5 page paper Suggested Unit Readings: Bawarshi, Anis. “The Genre Function.” College English. 62.3 (2000): 335-360. Web. Carter, Michael. “Ways of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines.” College Composition and Communication 58.3 (2007): 385-418. Web. Connors, Robert. “The Rhetoric of Citation Systems, Part II: Competing Epistemic Values in Citation.” Rhetoric Review. 17.2 (1999): 219-245. Web. Devitt, Amy J., Anis Bawarshi, and Mary Jo Reiff. "Materiality and Genre in the Study of Discourse Communities." College English 65.5 (2003): 541. Grant-Davie, Keith. "Rhetorical Situations and Their Constituents." Rhetoric Review 15.2 (1997): 264-79. JSTOR. Web. Haas, Christina, and Linda Flower. "Rhetorical Reading Strategies and the Construction of Meaning." College Composition and Communication 39.2 (1988): 167-183. MacDonald, Susan Peck. “A Method for Analyzing Sentence-Level Differences in Disciplinary Knowledge Making.” Written Communication. 9.4 (1992): 533-569. Web. Miller, Carolyn. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech. 70 (1984): 151-167. Web. The Wadsworth Guide to Research Chapter 2: Writing Processes Chapter 4: Finding Resources Through Secondary Research Chapter 6: Rhetorically Reading, Tracking, and Evaluating Resources Grading: (Adapt this section to articulate your class policies) Your work will be evaluated according to the following criteria: Excellent Acceptable Emerging Not Evident
3010-common-syllabus-ay1718.docx