Laursen, K., Reichstein, T. and Salter, A. (2011), the Effect of Geographical “Exploring Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United 45(4), 507-523. Regional Studies, Kingdom”, Morgan, K. (2004), exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial “The innovation 4(1), 3–21. Journal of Economic Geography, systems”, Nooteboom, B. , Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V. and van den Oord, A. (2007), cognitive distance and absorptive 36(7), 1016–1034. Research Policy, “Optimal capacity”, Oakey, R. technology small firms: their potential for (1991), “High rapid industrial growth”, 9(4), 31-42. International Small Business Journal, Ponds, R., Van Oort, F. and Frenken, K. (2007), geographical and institutional “The proximity of research 86(3), 423–443. Papers in Regional Science, collaboration”, Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1982), Innovation and the small and medium sized firm. Their London, UK: Frances Pinter. role in employment and in economic change, Storper, M. and Venables, A. (2004), face-to-face contact and the “Buzz: urban economy”, 4(4) , 351-370. Journal of Economic Geography, Zelner, B. A. to interpret results from logit, probit, and other (2009), “Using simulation 30(12), 1335–1348. Strategic Management Journal, nonlinear models”, Tables and figures Table 1. Distribution of 79 collaborating entrepreneurial ventures by industry, foundation year and localization Number Frequency of firms (%) 6 7.59 Energy and environmental services 26 32.91 ICT Manufacturing
Laursen, K., Reichstein, T. and Salter, A. (2011), “Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom”, Regional Studies, 45(4), 507-523. Morgan, K. (2004), “The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems”, Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1), 3–21. Nooteboom, B. , Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V. and van den Oord, A. (2007), “Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity”, Research Policy, 36(7), 1016–1034. Oakey, R. (1991), “High technology small firms: their potential for rapid industrial growth”, International Small Business Journal, 9(4), 31-42. Ponds, R., Van Oort, F. and Frenken, K. (2007), “The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration”, Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423–443. Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1982), Innovation and the small and medium sized firm. Their role in employment and in economic change, London, UK: Frances Pinter. Storper, M. and Venables, A. (2004), “Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy”, Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4) , 351-370. Zelner, B. A. (2009), “Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models”, Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1335–1348. Tables and figures Table 1. Distribution of 79 collaborating entrepreneurial ventures by industry, foundation year and localization Number of firms Frequency (%) Energy and environmental services 6 7.59 ICT Manufacturing 26 32.91
419_aidea2013_management-organization.docx