Assignment Cover Sheet PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATES, GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION Course: Perspective on Professionalism DUBAI Campus: Module Code: EEDD034 1 2 3 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA SUBMISSION E Identification of key issues at the forefront of the area of scholarship or professional practice Knowledge & Understanding S Awareness of complexity, contradiction and incompleteness of data in the area of scholarship E Advanced critical capacity allowing independent evaluation of the area of scholarship 4a. Comprehensive understanding of techniques/methodologies applicable to the research area Synthesis & I Application OR* 4b. Level of synthesis that generates a contribution to existing knowledge in the research area S 5. Clear and effective communication of complex information Communication & Presentation I 6. Presentation of work (regardless of content) at peer reviewed standards/publication quality *Different modules will specify which variant of criterion 4 will be assessed One of the following grades will be awarded, as appropriate, for each of the above six marking criteria: Indicates that there is evidence that doctoral standard has been achieved for this criterion. E extensive Indicates that there is evidence that doctoral standard has been achieved for this criterion. S sufficient Indicates that there is evidence that doctoral standard has been achieved for this criterion. I insufficient The AGREED GRADE indicates which of the following recommendations is being made by the markers: Doctoral standard has been achieved for assessed criteria (i.e. insufficiencies). Pass (P) ALL no – The revisions required are suitably minor to be completed and resubmitted within 3 Minor Amendments (M1) – weeks. The revisions required are substantive, involving major reorganisation of the work. Major Amendments (M2) – Revisions to be completed and resubmitted within 6 weeks. A fail grade will automatically be awarded if the required major/minor amendments are not submitted Fail (F) – within the specified time OR if the re-submitted assignment shows insufficient evidence of improvement (i.e., the same agreed grade cannot be awarded twice). SUBMISSION 1 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 Feedback due by: M2 AGREED GRADE: Marker name : Moderator name: NOTE: A sample of 10% of scripts or 10 scripts (whichever is the greater) will be selected for moderation marking. Please note that all marks are provisional and subject to confirmation by the Examination Board. TUTOR FEEDBACK ON ASSIGNMENT
Assignment Cover Sheet PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATES, GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION Course: Perspective on Professionalism Campus: DUBAI Module Code: EEDD034 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA SUBMISSION 1 2 3 Knowledge & Understanding Identification of key issues at the forefront of the area of scholarship or professional practice E Awareness of complexity, contradiction and incompleteness of data in the area of scholarship S Synthesis & Application Advanced critical capacity allowing independent evaluation of the area of scholarship E 4a. Comprehensive understanding of techniques/methodologies applicable to the research area OR* I 4b. Level of synthesis that generates a contribution to existing knowledge in the research area Communication & Presentation 5. Clear and effective communication of complex information S 6. Presentation of work (regardless of content) at peer reviewed standards/publication quality I *Different modules will specify which variant of criterion 4 will be assessed One of the following grades will be awarded, as appropriate, for each of the above six marking criteria: E Indicates that there is extensive evidence that doctoral standard has been achieved for this criterion. S Indicates that there is sufficient evidence that doctoral standard has been achieved for this criterion. I Indicates that there is insufficient evidence that doctoral standard has been achieved for this criterion. The AGREED GRADE indicates which of the following recommendations is being made by the markers: Pass (P) – Doctoral standard has been achieved for ALL assessed criteria (i.e. no insufficiencies). Minor Amendments (M1) – The revisions required are suitably minor to be completed and resubmitted within 3 weeks. Major Amendments (M2) – The revisions required are substantive, involving major reorganisation of the work. Revisions to be completed and resubmitted within 6 weeks. Fail (F) – A fail grade will automatically be awarded if the required major/minor amendments are not submitted within the specified time OR if the re-submitted assignment shows insufficient evidence of improvement (i.e., the same agreed grade cannot be awarded twice). SUBMISSION 1 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 Feedback due by: AGREED GRADE: M2 Marker name : Moderator name: NOTE: A sample of 10% of scripts or 10 scripts (whichever is the greater) will be selected for moderation marking. Please note that all marks are provisional and subject to confirmation by the Examination Board. TUTOR FEEDBACK ON ASSIGNMENT
620032241EEDD034sub2.docx