expected standards. Note that the scoring guide provides standards for all documents in the portfolio and additional specific standards for the autobiography, resource guide, quick reference, philosophy statement and the professional development plan. b) Scoring Guide Scoring Guide for Professional Portfolio 1 2 3 4 5 Does Not Meet Expectations Expectations Exceeds Expectations Professional Quality of Portfolio Comprehensiveness (6b) More than 1 document is missing &/or 1 document is missing or in the All documents are present in correct sections & complete placed in the incorrect section &/or incorrect section &/or is incomplete incomplete Formatting of Documents (6b) Documents make little use of bullets &/or Documents make some use of Documents make effective use of bullets &/or headings headings &/ or other formatting to display bullets &/or headings &/ or other &/ or other formatting to display information clearly information formatting to display information Writing Mechanics (6b) More than 9 spelling &/or grammar errors 3-6 spelling &/or grammar errors No spelling or grammar errors Navigation (6b) More than 6 problems navigating &/or 3 problems navigating &/or Links are clearly visible & all correctly linked. Reader reading the portfolio reading documents in the portfolio does not need to search for any item. Items are all readable without adjustment & correctly oriented. Presentation (6b) Formatting is inconsistent throughout the Formatting is generally consistent Formatting is consistent and adds to the clarity of the documents and distracts from the clarity of &/or generally adds to clarity of the documents the information information Autobiography Content (6a) No descriptions of experiences ground Most descriptions of experiences All descriptions of experiences ground candidate’s candidate’s identity as an early childhood ground candidate’s identity as an identity as an early childhood professional professional early childhood professional Professional Standards Content (6b) Candidate shows no evidence of how Candidate generally shows Candidate shows exceptional evidence of understanding standards translate into practice evidence of understanding how how standards translate into practice these translate into practice Resource Guide Content (6e) Guide is inadequate as a resource Guide provides multiple resources Guide provides a very detailed resource
expected standards. Note that the scoring guide provides standards for all documents in the portfolio and additional specific standards for the autobiography, resource guide, quick reference, philosophy statement and the professional development plan. b) Scoring Guide Scoring Guide for Professional Portfolio 1 Does Not Meet Expectations 2 3 Expectations 4 5 Exceeds Expectations Professional Quality of Portfolio Comprehensiveness (6b) More than 1 document is missing &/or placed in the incorrect section &/or incomplete 1 document is missing or in the incorrect section &/or is incomplete All documents are present in correct sections & complete Formatting of Documents (6b) Documents make little use of bullets &/or headings &/ or other formatting to display information Documents make some use of bullets &/or headings &/ or other formatting to display information Documents make effective use of bullets &/or headings &/ or other formatting to display information clearly Writing Mechanics (6b) More than 9 spelling &/or grammar errors 3-6 spelling &/or grammar errors No spelling or grammar errors Navigation (6b) More than 6 problems navigating &/or reading the portfolio 3 problems navigating &/or reading documents in the portfolio Links are clearly visible & all correctly linked. Reader does not need to search for any item. Items are all readable without adjustment & correctly oriented. Presentation (6b) Formatting is inconsistent throughout the documents and distracts from the clarity of the information Formatting is generally consistent &/or generally adds to clarity of the information Formatting is consistent and adds to the clarity of the documents Autobiography Content (6a) No descriptions of experiences ground candidate’s identity as an early childhood professional Most descriptions of experiences ground candidate’s identity as an early childhood professional All descriptions of experiences ground candidate’s identity as an early childhood professional Professional Standards Content (6b) Candidate shows no evidence of how standards translate into practice Candidate generally shows evidence of understanding how these translate into practice Candidate shows exceptional evidence of understanding how standards translate into practice Resource Guide Content (6e) Guide is inadequate as a resource Guide provides multiple resources Guide provides a very detailed resource
ELEM-2016-Assessment-Plan-4.17.docx