Annex 1: Capacity Development Scorecard Project/Programme Name: Capacity Development for improved management of Multilateral Environmental Agreements for Global Environmental Benefits Project/Programme Cycle Phase: Project preparation (PPG) Date: May 2015 Capacity Result / Outcome Staged Indicators Rating Score Comments Next Steps Indicator Contribution CR 1: Capacities for engagement Indicator 1 Degree of Institutional responsibilities for – legitimacy/mandate of environmental management are not 0 Develop education and Improved capacity lead environmental clearly defined awareness programmes of relevant organizations Institutional responsibilities for targeting stakeholders, the government entities environmental management are 1 project will contribute to to integrate identified increasing the legitimacy of environmental Legal and regulatory framework in place but Authority and legitimacy of all lead lead environmental education and public awareness and education remains critical 2 organizations responsible for organizations. Staff in these awareness raising for full recognition and engagement 2 environmental management are organizations will have a into programmes partially recognized by stakeholders greater capacity to coordinate and projects as environmental activities tools for natural Authority and legitimacy of all lead including the implementation of resource organizations responsible for 3 the MEA obligations. management environmental management recognized by stakeholders Indicator 2 Existence No co-management mechanisms are in – 0 of operational place Some co-management mechanisms are 1 mechanisms in place and operational MOU remains a means for establishing working Enhanced Some co-management mechanisms are relationships and shared jurisdictional 2 Continue coordination responsibilities. This is an ongoing process and formally established through 2 framework agreements, MOUs, etc. instituted on an as-needed basis. Comprehensive co-management mechanisms are formally established 3 and are operational/functional Indicator 3 Existence Identification of stakeholders and their Strengthened – of cooperation with participation/involvement in 0 capacity of NGOs While stakeholders are identified, their own The project will clarify the roles stakeholder groups is poor and CBOs to understanding of the context of their role of stakeholders in the context of Stakeholders are identified but their increase remains limited or not well understood. As a MEA obligations at the national participation in decision-making is 1 collaboration and result, a clearer approach to this understanding and international level, and limited 2 participation in the is required in the context of the existing and improve their knowledge and implementation of Stakeholders are identified and regular evolving environmental policy and legislative understanding of MEAs through MEAs, including consultations mechanisms are 2 framework for more meaningful and relevant the use of a participatory and increased established participation. collaborative approach. participatory role Stakeholders are identified and they 3 in MEA actively contribute to established
Annex 1: Capacity Development Scorecard Project/Programme Name: Capacity Development for improved management of Multilateral Environmental Agreements for Global Environmental Benefits Project/Programme Cycle Phase: Project preparation (PPG) Date: May 2015 Capacity Result / Indicator Staged Indicators Rating Score Comments Next Steps Outcome Contribution CR 1: Capacities for engagement Indicator 1 – Degree of legitimacy/mandate of lead environmental organizations Institutional responsibilities for environmental management are not clearly defined 0 2 Legal and regulatory framework in place but public awareness and education remains critical for full recognition and engagement Develop education and awareness programmes targeting stakeholders, the project will contribute to increasing the legitimacy of lead environmental organizations. Staff in these organizations will have a greater capacity to coordinate environmental activities including the implementation of the MEA obligations. Improved capacity of relevant government entities to integrate environmental education and awareness raising into programmes and projects as tools for natural resource management Institutional responsibilities for environmental management are identified 1 Authority and legitimacy of all lead organizations responsible for environmental management are partially recognized by stakeholders 2 Authority and legitimacy of all lead organizations responsible for environmental management recognized by stakeholders 3 Indicator 2 – Existence of operational mechanisms No co-management mechanisms are in place 0 2 MOU remains a means for establishing working relationships and shared jurisdictional responsibilities. This is an ongoing process and instituted on an as-needed basis. Continue Enhanced coordination framework Some co-management mechanisms are in place and operational 1 Some co-management mechanisms are formally established through agreements, MOUs, etc. 2 Comprehensive co-management mechanisms are formally established and are operational/functional 3 Indicator 3 – Existence of cooperation with stakeholder groups Identification of stakeholders and their participation/involvement in is poor 0 2 While stakeholders are identified, their own understanding of the context of their role remains limited or not well understood. As a result, a clearer approach to this understanding is required in the context of the existing and evolving environmental policy and legislative framework for more meaningful and relevant participation. The project will clarify the roles of stakeholders in the context of MEA obligations at the national and international level, and improve their knowledge and understanding of MEAs through the use of a participatory and collaborative approach. Strengthened capacity of NGOs and CBOs to increase collaboration and participation in the implementation of MEAs, including increased participatory role in MEA Stakeholders are identified but their participation in decision-making is limited 1 Stakeholders are identified and regular consultations mechanisms are established 2 Stakeholders are identified and they actively contribute to established 3
6-12-15_Trinidad_Tobago_5372_CCCD_ProDoc_11_Jun_20151.docx