Assessment Not Good Enough Good Very Good Score Criteria (0 score <6) (6 score <9) (9 score 10) Does not convey Presents decision Shows how nuances Criterion 1 Demonstrates problem setting as a setting clearly, of course material model with internal concisely, and lead to model and how to translate problem consistency completely decisions which expand upon description to a consistent introductory construct concepts Submission does not Work shows how a Demonstrates Criterion 2 Presents analysis show evidence of good decision methodology of in a way that underlying logic follows from general applicability and/or does not does analysis across problem produces useful insights not relate to decision domains setting Includes information Includes relevant Explains why some Criterion 3 Captures not relevant to the information and input is used and problem and/or omits excludes distracting why other content is important aspects of problem major elements of content omitted in a way that significance adds clarity and leads setting and supports decision to a consistent way making to evaluate complex problem settings Work is hard to Presentation is clear, Presentation shows Criterion 4 Presents work in follow and/or read. neat, and complete that client or decision Work does not show makers a way that reflects the logic behind the characteristics are analysis incorporated into all professionalism and care for work. client needs Total Score
Assessment Criteria Not Good Enough (0 score <6) Good (6 score <9) Very Good (9 score 10) Score Criterion 1 Demonstrates how to translate problem description to a consistent construct Does not convey problem setting as a model with internal consistency Presents decision setting clearly, concisely, and completely Shows how nuances of course material lead to model and decisions which expand upon introductory concepts Criterion 2 Presents analysis in a way that produces useful insights Submission does not show evidence of underlying logic and/or does not does not relate to decision setting Work shows how a good decision follows from analysis Demonstrates methodology of general applicability across problem domains Criterion 3 Captures important aspects of problem setting and supports decision making Includes information not relevant to the problem and/or omits major elements of significance Includes relevant information and excludes distracting content Explains why some input is used and why other content is omitted in a way that adds clarity and leads to a consistent way to evaluate complex problem settings Criterion 4 Presents work in a way that reflects professionalism and care for client needs Work is hard to follow and/or read. Work does not show the logic behind the analysis Presentation is clear, neat, and complete Presentation shows that client or decision makers characteristics are incorporated into all work. Total Score
610.625.docx