IT IS ORDERED that: The complaint filed by Nomad Village Mobile Home Park (aka New Nomad Park) Homeowners against Lazy Landing Mobile Home Park, LLC and Waterhouse Management Corp., is dismissed without prejudice. If Nomad Village Mobile Home Park (aka New Nomad Park) Homeowners/Complainants wish to refile their complaint in the future, they must cure all of the deficiencies identified in this decision. Specifically, a new complaint must: Provide a complete recounting (with the pleadings and orders attached) and the outcome from the Arbitration Proceedings Under the Santa Barbara County Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance that complainants initiated; Provide a complete recounting (with the pleadings and orders attached) of the hearing on the complainants’ Request for Review before the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County; Provide a complete recounting (with the pleadings and orders attached) of any appeal that complainants made to the Santa Barbara County Superior Court. Not include any requests for advisory opinions. Not include any requests for declaratory opinions. Explain, in detail, how their complaint before the Commission is distinct from the Arbitration Proceedings Under the Santa Barbara County Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance that complainants initiated. Explain, in detail, why the Commission’s Decision 0404043, Attachment A, doesn’t preclude complainants from challenging, before the Commission, the rental increases that are the subject of the instant complaint. Case 16-12-018 is closed.
IT IS ORDERED that: The complaint filed by Nomad Village Mobile Home Park (aka New Nomad Park) Homeowners against Lazy Landing Mobile Home Park, LLC and Waterhouse Management Corp., is dismissed without prejudice. If Nomad Village Mobile Home Park (aka New Nomad Park) Homeowners/Complainants wish to refile their complaint in the future, they must cure all of the deficiencies identified in this decision. Specifically, a new complaint must: Provide a complete recounting (with the pleadings and orders attached) and the outcome from the Arbitration Proceedings Under the Santa Barbara County Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance that complainants initiated; Provide a complete recounting (with the pleadings and orders attached) of the hearing on the complainants’ Request for Review before the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County; Provide a complete recounting (with the pleadings and orders attached) of any appeal that complainants made to the Santa Barbara County Superior Court. Not include any requests for advisory opinions. Not include any requests for declaratory opinions. Explain, in detail, how their complaint before the Commission is distinct from the Arbitration Proceedings Under the Santa Barbara County Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance that complainants initiated. Explain, in detail, why the Commission’s Decision 0404043, Attachment A, doesn’t preclude complainants from challenging, before the Commission, the rental increases that are the subject of the instant complaint. Case 16-12-018 is closed.
238894078.docx