Style Excellent breadth and depth Demonstrates a good Demonstrates a clear Demonstrates a basic or • • • • of analysis. understanding of the understanding of the limited understanding of the Very good originality and question and a moderately question and an awareness of question and addresses a • insight and excellent ability to good breadth of reference to the key issues. small number of relevant critically evaluate, contrast, the relevant literature. Evidence of a moderate issues. • and with the research Limited in critical evaluation reading of the core material Shows evidence of limited ‘play’ • and argument contained and comparison of the though with limited breadth awareness of the core within a broad range of literature considered. or depth of analysis. material, with some reference relevant literature, including Good breadth of material Lists the key points of the to relevant literature. • • recent work in this area. relevant to the question. relevant literature but does Superficial treatment, • Clearly and concisely argued Some critical evaluation and not critically compare or limited evaluation and • and analyzed throughout. contrasting of the relevant evaluate them. description. literature. Some depth of analysis, though lacking in originality or insight. Good breadth and depth of • analysis. Demonstrates moderately good ability to critically evaluate and contrast research and argument within the relevant literature. Some originality and insight. Courses where learning outcome was assessed: EMBA 6915, Ethics and Social Responsibility Evaluator: Neil Walshe Phase 2: Results Assessment and Planned Action Results: Exemplary Accomplished Developing Foundation % Students at Exemplary or Accomplished Level 4 3 2 1 Categories: Prepare Data and 13 5 1 0 95% Findings
Style • Excellent breadth and depth of analysis. • Very good originality and insight and excellent ability to critically evaluate, contrast, and ‘play’ with the research and argument contained within a broad range of relevant literature, including recent work in this area. • Clearly and concisely argued and analyzed throughout. • Demonstrates a good understanding of the question and a moderately good breadth of reference to the relevant literature. Limited in critical evaluation and comparison of the literature considered. • Good breadth of material relevant to the question. Some critical evaluation and contrasting of the relevant literature. Some depth of analysis, though lacking in originality or insight. • Good breadth and depth of analysis. Demonstrates moderately good ability to critically evaluate and contrast research and argument within the relevant literature. Some originality and insight. • Demonstrates a clear understanding of the question and an awareness of the key issues. • Evidence of a moderate reading of the core material though with limited breadth or depth of analysis. • Lists the key points of the relevant literature but does not critically compare or evaluate them. • Demonstrates a basic or limited understanding of the question and addresses a small number of relevant issues. • Shows evidence of limited awareness of the core material, with some reference to relevant literature. • Superficial treatment, limited evaluation and description. Courses where learning outcome was assessed: EMBA 6915, Ethics and Social Responsibility Evaluator: Neil Walshe Phase 2: Results Assessment and Planned Action Results: Categories: Exemplary Accomplished Developing Foundation % Students at Exemplary or Accomplished Level 4 3 2 1 Prepare Data and Findings 13 5 1 0 95%
EMBA_AoL_Report_AY15-16_LO_2_EMBA_6915_20160907.docx