7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible Yes government entity status? Showing of or §1803.1(b)) “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding A.09-04-001 Verified number: 10. Date of ALJ ruling: July 29, 2009 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D. 17-10-024 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: October 30, Verified 2017 15. File date of compensation request: December 29, 2017 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) 1.PG&E violated the Mariposa D. 12-03-008 Conclusion of Law # Verified Settlement violated 4 Page 18 “PG&E Condition B of the Mariposa Settlement Agreement.” 2.PG&E should be fined for its Verified breach of the Mariposa Decision 15-01-052 Page 3 Agreement. The remedy the “We have carefully considered proposed in D. 12-03-008 is arguments presented by CARE and inadequate. CBE and are of the opinion that grounds for limited rehearing have been demonstrated. Therefore, we
7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible government entity status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) or §1803.1(b)) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: A.09-04-001 Verified 10. Date of ALJ ruling: July 29, 2009 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D. 17-10-024 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: October 30, 2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: December 29, 2017 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion 1.PG&E violated the Mariposa Settlement D. 12-03-008 Conclusion of Law # 4 Page 18 “PG&E violated Condition B of the Mariposa Settlement Agreement.” Verified 2.PG&E should be fined for its breach of the Mariposa Agreement. The remedy proposed in D. 12-03-008 is inadequate. Decision 15-01-052 Page 3 “We have carefully considered the arguments presented by CARE and CBE and are of the opinion that grounds for limited rehearing have been demonstrated. Therefore, we Verified
212619327.docx