(d): uncertain – there could be a market for digitised copies of back issues of these newspapers, but the market may not be large enough to attract interest from a commercial digitiser Not applicable in the Fairness Factor Publisher – National (b) may apply contactable. – Library’s the project view. The would facilitate Journalists Library One research and and others – would 1956 to 1996 publisher. study. Fairness diligent proceed (after which factor (c): not search Australian based on Academic and digitised applicable. effort Economic risk business issues are would be History journal available estimated, Fairness Factor high; the Review (in which from (d): Digital Library permission sampling, copies could would from the 1040 have a potential probably publishers market; on that not rely on would be a criterion, Fair the Orphan key factor), Use is unlikely Works and support to apply provisions from the Fair Use provisions.
(d): uncertain – there could be a market for digitised copies of back issues of these newspapers, but the market may not be large enough to attract interest from a commercial digitiser Australian Economic History Review Academic and business journal 1956 to 1996 (after which digitised issues are available One publisher. estimated, from sampling, 1040 Fairness Factor (b) may apply – the project would facilitate research and study. Fairness factor (c): not applicable. Fairness Factor (d): Digital copies could have a potential market; on that criterion, Fair Use is unlikely to apply Publisher – contactable. Journalists and others – diligent search effort would be high; the Library would probably not rely on the Orphan Works provisions Not applicable in the National Library’s view. The Library would proceed based on risk (in which permission from the publishers would be a key factor), and support from the Fair Use provisions.
704._org__national_library_of_australia.docx