Environmental Monitoring Plan Tables 30 and 31 list all mitigation and enhancement measures, their corresponding estimated cost of implementation, responsible party, and main monitoring parameters. Considerations used to establish estimated costs can be found in Annex 12. Table 30. Environmental Monitoring Plan (Table 3 of the USAID Guidelines for Implementing Partners, 2015): Mitigation Measures. Monitoring Results Estimated Recommended Mitigation Measures Responsible Dates Problems Mitigation Costs Adjustments Party Indicators Methods Frequency Monitored Encountered Effectiveness Project $3,000 Direct review Once 1. Implement an environmental supervision. Contract Implementer /month Constructor/ Plants removed Inventory / See Nº 1 2. Minimize vegetation removal, or replace Weekly Supervision & planted supervision Table 31 with recommended species. 3. Establish a trust fund, and engage spon- Project % of costs Accounting No direct Monthly sors for specific interventions, and/or oper- Implementer covered report costs ational costs. Project Program Monthly re- ≈$8,000 4. Establish a Maintenance and Improve- Quarterly Implementer indicators ports /month ment Program. Project Agreement 5. Habilitate Tin-Marín’s parking area to Direct review Once $5,000 Implementer signed serve both the Museum and the Park. Constructor/ Reported 6. Avoid potential damages to relevant cul- Supervision Daily None Supervision damages tural patrimony elements. 7. Get MINSAL’s approval for the exten- Project Permission Direct review Once None sion of the National Art Gallery compo- Implementer granted nent. Project Frequency of Review of meet- $100 8. Maintain an open dialog with all key Monthly Implementer meetings ing reports /month stakeholders. Triple of current costs (Table 4), including maintenance personnel, and expendable materials 1 Including signage and Access ramp to the Park 2 For meeting costs 3
Environmental Monitoring Plan Tables 30 and 31 list all mitigation and enhancement measures, their corresponding estimated cost of implementation, responsible party, and main monitoring parameters. Considerations used to establish estimated costs can be found in Annex 12. Table 30. Environmental Monitoring Plan (Table 3 of the USAID Guidelines for Implementing Partners, 2015): Mitigation Measures. Monitoring Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Indicators Methods Frequency Estimated Costs Results Recommended Adjustments Dates Problems Mitigation Monitored Encountered Effectiveness 1. Implement an environmental supervision. Project Implementer Contract Direct review Once $3,000 /month 2. Minimize vegetation removal, or replace with recommended species. Constructor/ Supervision Plants removed & planted Inventory / supervision Weekly See Nº 1 Table 31 3. Establish a trust fund, and engage spon- sors for specific interventions, and/or oper- ational costs. Project Implementer % of costs covered Accounting report Monthly No direct costs 4. Establish a Maintenance and Improve- ment Program. Project Implementer Program indicators Monthly re- ports Quarterly ≈$8,000 /month 5. Habilitate Tin-Marín’s parking area to serve both the Museum and the Park. Project Implementer Agreement signed Direct review Once $5,000 6. Avoid potential damages to relevant cul- tural patrimony elements. Constructor/ Supervision Reported damages Supervision Daily None 7. Get MINSAL’s approval for the exten- sion of the National Art Gallery compo- nent. Project Implementer Permission granted Direct review Once None 8. Maintain an open dialog with all key stakeholders. Project Implementer Frequency of meetings Review of meet- ing reports Monthly $100 /month 1 Triple of current costs (Table 4), including maintenance personnel, and expendable materials 2 Including signage and Access ramp to the Park 3 For meeting costs
49975.docx