Attachment B Submissions received No. Name of submitter Summary of submission 1 Chris Blackham-Davison A broad submission in relation to all exemption orders and target reduction orders applied for by Fetch TV in the Specified Eligible Period. The submission asked the ACMA to not approve the orders Fetch TV applied for, on the grounds that the submitter is deaf/hard of hearing and will not subscribe to Fetch TV if the orders are granted, as the submitter would not have access to the same amount of content, which the submitter states is unfair and unequitable. 2 Kara Weslake This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1. 3 Gail Finn This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1. 4 Hilda Sutcliffe This submitter states that they have a Fetch TV and were considering subscribing to a Fetch TV subscription channel pack, but will not do so because the submitter is deaf/hard of hearing and if the orders are granted the submitter would not have access to the same amount of content, which the submitter states is unfair and unequitable. 5 Phillip Waters This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1. 6 Suzanne Robertson This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1, with the exception that it is the who is deaf/heard of hearing. submitter’s son 7 Robyn Anguey This submission stated that as a subscriber to the Fetch TV service, they submitter pays the same amount as other subscribers yet will have access to less content if the Order is granted, as the submitter is deaf/hard of hearing. 8 Robyn Whitney This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1. 9 Trish Loveday This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 7. 10 Rebekah Rose-Mundy This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1, with the exception that the submitter noted that not only is she deaf, but she has three deaf children and works with many deaf children; the submitter stated that captioning is vital for them to be able to access information and entertainment. 11 Rachel Hughes This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1.
Attachment B Submissions received No. Name of submitter Summary of submission 1 Chris Blackham-Davison A broad submission in relation to all exemption orders and target reduction orders applied for by Fetch TV in the Specified Eligible Period. The submission asked the ACMA to not approve the orders Fetch TV applied for, on the grounds that the submitter is deaf/hard of hearing and will not subscribe to Fetch TV if the orders are granted, as the submitter would not have access to the same amount of content, which the submitter states is unfair and unequitable. 2 Kara Weslake This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1. 3 Gail Finn This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1. 4 Hilda Sutcliffe This submitter states that they have a Fetch TV and were considering subscribing to a Fetch TV subscription channel pack, but will not do so because the submitter is deaf/hard of hearing and if the orders are granted the submitter would not have access to the same amount of content, which the submitter states is unfair and unequitable. 5 Phillip Waters This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1. 6 Suzanne Robertson This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1, with the exception that it is the submitter’s son who is deaf/heard of hearing. 7 Robyn Anguey This submission stated that as a subscriber to the Fetch TV service, they submitter pays the same amount as other subscribers yet will have access to less content if the Order is granted, as the submitter is deaf/hard of hearing. 8 Robyn Whitney This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1. 9 Trish Loveday This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 7. 10 Rebekah Rose-Mundy This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1, with the exception that the submitter noted that not only is she deaf, but she has three deaf children and works with many deaf children; the submitter stated that captioning is vital for them to be able to access information and entertainment. 11 Rachel Hughes This submission contained content and statements identical to Submission 1.
293_Al%20Jazeera_Final%20SoR%20docx.docx