2.1.2 Ethical Principles Recognize and SW Practice with Small Advanced Standing M = 4.74 74 Benchmark met Systems Final Proposal 100% M = 3.96 manage personal values in a way that allows professional Ethics group project 94% 99.2% values to guide practice 99% Make ethical SW Practice with Small Advanced Standing M = 4.74 75 Benchmark met decisions by applying Systems Final Proposal 100% M = 4.07 standards of the National Ethics group project 94% 99.2% Association of Social 99% Workers Code of Ethics… Tolerate ambiguity SW Practice with Small Advanced Standing M = 4.35 76 Benchmark met Systems Final Proposal 100% M = 3.76 in resolving ethical conflicts Ethics group project 94% 97.7% 99% Apply strategies of SW Practice with Small Advanced Standing M = 4.56 4 Benchmark met ethical reasoning to arrive at Systems Final Proposal 100% M = 3.92 principled decisions 94% 98.4% 2.1.3 Critical Thinking Distinguish, Fundamentals of Research I Advanced Standing M = 4.45 78, 82 Benchmark met appraise, Literature review Article Critique 100% M = 3.59 and integrate multiple sources 97% 84% 92.7% of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom of Fundamentals of Research II Advanced Standing M = 4.38 79, 81 Benchmark met • Analyze models assessment, prevention, Empirical article critique Article Critique 100% M = 3.95 intervention, and evaluation 100% 84% 98.4% SW Practice with Large Advanced Standing M = 4.58 5, 6, 80 Benchmark met Demonstrate System Article Critique 100% M = 3.77 effective oral and written Grant application 84% 96.2% communication in working 100% with individuals, families,
2.1.2 Ethical Principles Recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice SW Practice with Small Systems Ethics group project 99% Advanced Standing Final Proposal 94% M = 4.74 100% 74 M = 3.96 99.2% Benchmark met Make ethical decisions by applying standards of the National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics… SW Practice with Small Systems Ethics group project 99% Advanced Standing Final Proposal 94% M = 4.74 100% 75 M = 4.07 99.2% Benchmark met Tolerate ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts SW Practice with Small Systems Ethics group project 99% Advanced Standing Final Proposal 94% M = 4.35 100% 76 M = 3.76 97.7% Benchmark met Apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions SW Practice with Small Systems Advanced Standing Final Proposal 94% M = 4.56 100% 4 M = 3.92 98.4% Benchmark met 2.1.3 Critical Thinking Distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom Fundamentals of Research I Literature review 97% Advanced Standing Article Critique 84% M = 4.45 100% 78, 82 M = 3.59 92.7% Benchmark met • Analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention, and evaluation Fundamentals of Research II Empirical article critique 100% Advanced Standing Article Critique 84% M = 4.38 100% 79, 81 M = 3.95 98.4% Benchmark met Demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with individuals, families, SW Practice with Large System Grant application 100% Advanced Standing Article Critique 84% M = 4.58 100% 5, 6, 80 M = 3.77 96.2% Benchmark met
2e3cb82b-1f13-4cfd-8ac7-bf3d5b90cb99.docx