1: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users but little or no cooperation 2: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, but only some co-operation 3: There is regular contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, and substantial co-operation on management Comments and Next Steps 0: Indigenous and traditional peoples have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area 1: Indigenous and traditional peoples have some input into discussions relating to management but 23. Indigenous people: Do indigenous and traditional no direct role in management peoples resident or regularly using the protected 2: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly 3 area have input to management decisions? contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved 3: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management Comments and Next Steps 0: Local communities have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area 1: Local communities have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct 24. Local communities: Do local communities role in management resident or near the protected area have input to 2: Local communities directly contribute to some 3 management decisions? relevant decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved 3: Local communities directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management Comments and Next Steps 24 a. Impact on communities: There is open communication and trust between local and/or 0: No indigenous people, stakeholders and protected area 1 1: Yes managers Comments and Next Steps
1: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users but little or no cooperation 2: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, but only some co-operation 3: There is regular contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, and substantial co-operation on management Comments and Next Steps 23. Indigenous people: Do indigenous and traditional peoples resident or regularly using the protected area have input to management decisions? 3 0: Indigenous and traditional peoples have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area 1: Indigenous and traditional peoples have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management 2: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved 3: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management Comments and Next Steps 24. Local communities: Do local communities resident or near the protected area have input to management decisions? 3 0: Local communities have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area 1: Local communities have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management 2: Local communities directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved 3: Local communities directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management Comments and Next Steps 24 a. Impact on communities: There is open communication and trust between local and/or indigenous people, stakeholders and protected area managers 1 0: No 1: Yes Comments and Next Steps
03-04-15_GEF_5368_UNDP_5177_Guinea-Bissau_PA_System_PRODOC_03Mar15_0.docx