Table 4. An example of input-output tables for two industries, 2011 Machinery and Computer, electronic Exports Sales equipment and optical products (Billion (Billion yen) yen) Domestic Domestic Exporting Shipment Shipment activity activity activity activity Domestic Shipment 0 1586.49 activity and activity 492.51 492.51 Machinery equipment Domestic Shipment 0 22667.63 activity products electronic activity 423.19 2812.32 optical Computer, and Value added 524.50 137.82 815.65 110.05 (Billion yen) Total capital stock per 5.38 8.10 3.82 6.59 worker (Mil. yen/worker) Labor productivity 635.22 893.59 777.48 1527.06 (Mil. yen/worker) Number of 3,061 5,712 3,738 5,123 workers Share of university 522,639 87,796 757,495 84,120 graduates Share of 0.25 0.35 0.26 0.35 workers Sales (Billion 0.151 0.159 0.18 0.13 yen) Note only that share of non-regular workers is similar for exporting and domestic shipment activity in machinery and equipment industry while it is higher for domestic shipment activity in computer, electronic and optical products industry. In sum, all these observations imply a heterogeneity of factor inputs for exporting and domestic shipment activity which may vary considerably in between and within industries. Thus, our findings suggest that accounting for exporting activity's heterogeneity in the split input-output table may provide a better picture on the factor inputs and value added distribution within industries. Next, we discuss the differences between main indicators presented in section III.3 that arise when we split IO table into exporting and domestic shipment activity. First, we examine the domestic and foreign value added in industries exports. To present it in a Japanese’
Table 4. An example of input-output tables for two industries, 2011 Machinery and equipment Computer, electronic and optical products Exports (Billion yen) Sales (Billion yen) Domestic Shipment activity activity Domestic Shipment activity Exporting activity Machinery and equipment Domestic Shipment activity 0 1586.49 activity 492.51 492.51 Computer, electronic and optical products Domestic Shipment activity 0 22667.63 activity 423.19 2812.32 Value added (Billion yen) 524.50 137.82 815.65 110.05 Total capital stock per worker (Mil. yen/worker) 5.38 8.10 3.82 6.59 Labor productivity (Mil. yen/worker) 635.22 893.59 777.48 1527.06 Number of workers 3,061 5,712 3,738 5,123 Share of university graduates 522,639 87,796 757,495 84,120 Share of workers 0.25 0.35 0.26 0.35 Sales (Billion yen) 0.151 0.159 0.18 0.13 Note only that share of non-regular workers is similar for exporting and domestic shipment activity in machinery and equipment industry while it is higher for domestic shipment activity in computer, electronic and optical products industry. In sum, all these observations imply a heterogeneity of factor inputs for exporting and domestic shipment activity which may vary considerably in between and within industries. Thus, our findings suggest that accounting for exporting activity's heterogeneity in the split input-output table may provide a better picture on the factor inputs and value added distribution within industries. Next, we discuss the differences between main indicators presented in section III.3 that arise when we split IO table into exporting and domestic shipment activity. First, we examine the domestic and foreign value added in Japanese’ industries exports. To present it in a
2543_20160520031_KI_KF_ID_FirmHeterogeneity_20160520.docx