Maryland State Hazard Mitigation Plan Update EMAP Compliance Issue Notes Action #2 Refer to bolded subsection 4.3.1 The Program did not provide proof of Consequence Analysis under section documentation of its assessment of the risk 4.6.4.3 Risk Assessment (page 90). and vulnerability of people of the following Refer to bolded subsection hazards: Consequence Analysis under section 1. Sea Level Rise 2. Tsunami 3. 4.6.6.7 Risk Assessment (page 109). Nor’Easter 4. Shoreline Erosion Refer to bolded subsection 5. Landslide Consequence Analysis under section (page 116). 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.5.3 Risk Assessment (page 103). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.12.3 Risk Assessment (page 182). Action #3 Refer to bolded subsection State and 4.3.1 The Program did not provide proof of Critical Facility Risk under section documentation of its assessment of the risk (page 116). 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment and vulnerability of the property of the Refer to the tables on page 119. following hazard: Nor’Easter Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). Action #4 Refer to bolded subsection 4.3.1 The Program did not provide proof of Consequence Analysis under section documentation of its assessment of the risk 4.6.6.7 Risk Assessment (page 109). and vulnerability of environment of the Refer to bolded subsection following hazards: Consequence Analysis under section 1. Tsunami 2. Nor’Easter 3. Landslide 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). 4. Dam Failure Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.12.3 Risk Assessment (page 182). Refer to paragraph three of bolded subsection Impact and Vulnerability under section 4.16.1 Risk Assessment (page 230).
Maryland State Hazard Mitigation Plan Update EMAP Compliance Issue Notes Action #2 4.3.1 The Program did not provide proof of documentation of its assessment of the risk and vulnerability of people of the following hazards: 1. Sea Level Rise 2. Tsunami 3. Nor’Easter 4. Shoreline Erosion 5. Landslide Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.4.3 Risk Assessment (page 90). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.6.7 Risk Assessment (page 109). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.5.3 Risk Assessment (page 103). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.12.3 Risk Assessment (page 182). Action #3 4.3.1 The Program did not provide proof of documentation of its assessment of the risk and vulnerability of the property of the following hazard: Nor’Easter Refer to bolded subsection State and Critical Facility Risk under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). Refer to the tables on page 119. Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). Action #4 4.3.1 The Program did not provide proof of documentation of its assessment of the risk and vulnerability of environment of the following hazards: 1. Tsunami 2. Nor’Easter 3. Landslide 4. Dam Failure Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.6.7 Risk Assessment (page 109). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.6.7.3 Risk Assessment (page 116). Refer to bolded subsection Consequence Analysis under section 4.12.3 Risk Assessment (page 182). Refer to paragraph three of bolded subsection Impact and Vulnerability under section 4.16.1 Risk Assessment (page 230).
EMAP%20and%20State%20HMP%20Summary%20Spreadsheet%20(1).docx