Wong et al, N= 64, 41 SB FU: nm No stool loss Single centre FI score in SB improved from 18 Not evaluated 08 37 Age: 6-15y TT: 5-60min Retrospective chart review to 7 LL: nm Interviews and telephone, 28/64 complications FI: nm structured questionnaire score Constipation: 0-24 (0=full continence, 24= nm complete incontinence) Chait cecostomy glycerine or saline water every 48 to 72h Yardley et al, N= 61,27 SB FU: 132 Stool loss < Single centre 25 dropped out Satisfaction score of ACE users: 09 38 Age: months 1x/ month 11/16 (69%) SB continent 4 (1=very unsatisfied, 5= very Postal/telephone questionnaire TT: nm 5/36 complications satisfied) LL: nm 2/36 redo surgery High dissatisfaction with FI: nm transitional care Constipation: nm Matsuno et N= 25 SB FU: 27.5 No stool loss Single centre 10/13 (77%) RCE Not evaluated al, 10 39 Age: months Comparing RCE to ACE TT: 37.7 min retrospectively 8/12 (75%) ACE 5 wheelchair [20-60] - 13 patients RCE LL: nm 3/13 RCE independent - 12 patients ACE FI: nm 8/12 ACE independent tap water, daily to every 48h Constipation: age is significant (p=0.009) nm younger in RCE compared to ACE Bar-Yosef et N= 21 SB FU: 56 Not defined Single centre 19/21 (90%) full fecal Not evaluated al, 11 40 Age: 6-22y months Retrospective chart review continence LL: nm TT: nm Artificial urinary sphincter and 3/21 complications FI: nm Malone ACE 2/21 redo surgery Constipation: nm Ok and N= 23 SB FU: 6 months Not defined Single centre Diaper need decreased Significant improvement in Kurzrock, 11 families TT: 45 min FICQoL: 51 item questionnaire Accident number improved from caretaker anxiety, depression 41 Age: nm before and 6 months after ACE 3.9 to 0.3 per week (p<0.01) and bother LL: nm procedure FI: nm - 23 families before surgery Constipation: - 18 families after surgery
Wong et al, 08 37 N= 64, 41 SB Age: 6-15y LL: nm FI: nm Constipation: nm FU: nm TT: 5-60min No stool loss Single centre Retrospective chart review Interviews and telephone, structured questionnaire score 0-24 (0=full continence, 24= complete incontinence) Chait cecostomy glycerine or saline water every 48 to 72h FI score in SB improved from 18 to 7 28/64 complications Not evaluated Yardley et al, 09 38 N= 61,27 SB Age: LL: nm FI: nm Constipation: nm FU: 132 months TT: nm Stool loss < 1x/ month Single centre Postal/telephone questionnaire 25 dropped out 11/16 (69%) SB continent 5/36 complications 2/36 redo surgery Satisfaction score of ACE users: 4 (1=very unsatisfied, 5= very satisfied) High dissatisfaction with transitional care Matsuno et al, 10 39 N= 25 SB Age: 5 wheelchair LL: nm FI: nm Constipation: nm FU: 27.5 months TT: 37.7 min [20-60] No stool loss Single centre Comparing RCE to ACE retrospectively - 13 patients RCE - 12 patients ACE tap water, daily to every 48h age is significant (p=0.009) younger in RCE compared to ACE 10/13 (77%) RCE 8/12 (75%) ACE 3/13 RCE independent 8/12 ACE independent Not evaluated Bar-Yosef et al, 11 40 N= 21 SB Age: 6-22y LL: nm FI: nm Constipation: nm FU: 56 months TT: nm Not defined Single centre Retrospective chart review Artificial urinary sphincter and Malone ACE 19/21 (90%) full fecal continence 3/21 complications 2/21 redo surgery Not evaluated Ok and Kurzrock, 11 41 N= 23 SB families Age: nm LL: nm FI: nm Constipation: FU: 6 months TT: 45 min Not defined Single centre FICQoL: 51 item questionnaire before and 6 months after ACE procedure - 23 families before surgery - 18 families after surgery Diaper need decreased Accident number improved from 3.9 to 0.3 per week (p<0.01) Significant improvement in caretaker anxiety, depression and bother
4170206.docx