s. 51 (3) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1) or (2) in circumstances in which the services provided by the accused were related to the cognitive impairment of the other person, it is a defence to the charge for the accused to prove on the balance of probabilities that at the time at which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the accused believed on reasonable grounds that the other person did not have a cognitive impairment. (4) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1) or (2) in circumstances in which the services provided by the accused were not related to the cognitive impairment of the other person, it is a defence to the charge for the accused to prove on the balance of probabilities that at the time at which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the accused was not aware that the other person had a cognitive impairment. (5) Consent is not a defence to a charge against subsection (1) or (2) unless the accused satisfies the court on the balance of probabilities that at the time at which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the accused believed on reasonable grounds that he or she was the spouse or domestic partner of the other person. (6) If consent is relevant to a charge against subsection (1) or (2), the prosecution bears the burden of proving lack of consent.
(3) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1) or (2) in circumstances in which the services provided by the accused were related to the cognitive impairment of the other person, it is a defence to the charge for the accused to prove on the balance of probabilities that at the time at which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the accused believed on reasonable grounds that the other person did not have a cognitive impairment. (4) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1) or (2) in circumstances in which the services provided by the accused were not related to the cognitive impairment of the other person, it is a defence to the charge for the accused to prove on the balance of probabilities that at the time at which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the accused was not aware that the other person had a cognitive impairment. s. 51 (5) Consent is not a defence to a charge against subsection (1) or (2) unless the accused satisfies the court on the balance of probabilities that at the time at which the offence is alleged to have been committed, the accused believed on reasonable grounds that he or she was the spouse or domestic partner of the other person. (6) If consent is relevant to a charge against subsection (1) or (2), the prosecution bears the burden of proving lack of consent.
58-6231a248.docx