Amended NOI. We The Commission has begun to analyze closely activities CC’s therefore include this and funding at the end of 2015, in other proceedings. On citation to a recent November 9, 2015, in A.15-02-009, CC filed an amended NOI, intervenor providing new information and more facts demonstrating CC’s compensation reward work for the corporations in the renewable energy industries and that affirmed Clean markets. The June 30, 2016 ruling in A.15-02-009 determined Coalition’s showing of significant that CC had become ineligible for compensation. motion CC’s financial hardship. to reconsider the ruling was denied. We find it appropriate to grant this claim, based on the finding of eligibility in D.16-05-049 (R.14.07-002), rather than denying the claim based on the findings of ineligibility made in CC’s A.15-02-009. We find it fair to the intervenor because between the filing of its April 2, 2015 NOI in this proceeding and the Ruling of June 30, 2016 in A.15-02-009 that analyzed new facts and rejected the NOI, CC was participating in this proceeding without a warning that CC is not eligible to claim compensation. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Claimed Specific References to CPUC Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Contribution(s) Claimed Contribution(s) Discussion Verified Participation in the D.16-12-036 at 6. See Competitive Solicitation See Competitive Solicitation Framework Working Group Framework Working Group Final (“Working Group”) Report Filed by Southern California The Clean Coalition participated Edison Company (U 338-E), Pacific in the Working Group, including Gas and Electric Company (U several sub-groups, and San Diego Gas & Electric contributed to the Competitive Company (U 902-E), and Southern Solicitation Framework Working California Gas Company (U 904-G) Group Final Report. The Clean at 7 (Aug. 1, 2016). oral and written Coalition’s contributions shaped the final report, which the Commission referenced and adopted parts of in the final decision. Positions the Clean Coalition took in the Working Group include: Ensuring that the pilot and the Working Group’s efforts work towards developing
Amended NOI. We therefore include this citation to a recent intervenor compensation reward that affirmed Clean Coalition’s showing of significant financial hardship. The Commission has begun to analyze closely CC’s activities and funding at the end of 2015, in other proceedings. On November 9, 2015, in A.15-02-009, CC filed an amended NOI, providing new information and more facts demonstrating CC’s work for the corporations in the renewable energy industries and markets. The June 30, 2016 ruling in A.15-02-009 determined that CC had become ineligible for compensation. CC’s motion to reconsider the ruling was denied. We find it appropriate to grant this claim, based on the finding of eligibility in D.16-05-049 (R.14.07-002), rather than denying the claim based on the findings of CC’s ineligibility made in A.15-02-009. We find it fair to the intervenor because between the filing of its April 2, 2015 NOI in this proceeding and the Ruling of June 30, 2016 in A.15-02-009 that analyzed new facts and rejected the NOI, CC was participating in this proceeding without a warning that CC is not eligible to claim compensation. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion Participation in the Competitive Solicitation Framework Working Group (“Working Group”) The Clean Coalition participated in the Working Group, including several sub-groups, and contributed to the Competitive Solicitation Framework Working Group Final Report. The Clean Coalition’s oral and written contributions shaped the final report, which the Commission referenced and adopted parts of in the final decision. Positions the Clean Coalition took in the Working Group include: Ensuring that the pilot and the Working Group’s efforts work towards developing See D.16-12-036 at 6. See Competitive Solicitation Framework Working Group Final Report Filed by Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E), and Southern California Gas Company (U 904-G) at 7 (Aug. 1, 2016). Verified
216634082.docx