High Opportunity Program, June Ruling Regarding High 2, 2016 (discussing Opportunity Energy Efficiency TURN’s (HOPPs response) (attached to this Programs or Projects Ruling). TURN contributed to request as Attachment 6) the outcomes in the HOPPs TURN Cmts on Phase II Ruling. Workshop 3, 4/13/15, pp. 17-21 For instance, TURN (outlining concepts for recommended that the residential and commercial Commission amend pilot programs) Staff’s proposed baseline adjustment CPUC Disposition approving for HOPPs for on “replace Advice Letter 4948/4948-A, equipment to clarify burnout” High SCG’s Commercial that “repair eligible” Opportunity Projects and equipment will be treated Programs (HOPPs)- Commercial differently than equipment that Restaurant Retrofit (CRR) cannot be repaired. The Program (discussing TURN’s Commission responded by response) (attached to this inviting PAs to make a request as Attachment 7) supported case in their HOPPs proposal that a given piece of equipment has a history of being repaired rather than replaced. TURN also opposed Staff’s proposed baseline adjustment for “routine maintenance” undertaken as part of Retrocommissioning HOPPs, so that all savings flowing directly from the intervention – including routine maintenance that has been neglected but is required for for participation in the EE program would be – counted. While the Commission did not adopt precise approach, the TURN’s Commission agreed that routine maintenance should be counted with certain qualifications in order to facilitate to objective of AB 802 to make maintenance happen that should be happening but isn’t.
Ruling Regarding High Opportunity Energy Efficiency Programs or Projects (HOPPs Ruling). TURN contributed to the outcomes in the HOPPs Ruling. For instance, TURN recommended that the Commission amend Staff’s proposed baseline adjustment for HOPPs for “replace on burnout” equipment to clarify that “repair eligible” equipment will be treated differently than equipment that cannot be repaired. The Commission responded by inviting PAs to make a case in their HOPPs proposal that a given piece of equipment has a history of being repaired rather than replaced. TURN also opposed Staff’s proposed baseline adjustment for “routine maintenance” undertaken as part of Retrocommissioning HOPPs, so that all savings flowing directly from the intervention – including routine maintenance that has been neglected but is required for for participation in the EE program – would be counted. While the Commission did not adopt TURN’s precise approach, the Commission agreed that routine maintenance should be counted with certain qualifications in order to facilitate to objective of AB 802 to make maintenance happen that should be happening but isn’t. High Opportunity Program, June 2, 2016 (discussing TURN’s response) (attached to this request as Attachment 6) TURN Cmts on Phase II Workshop 3, 4/13/15, pp. 17-21 (outlining concepts for residential and commercial pilot programs) CPUC Disposition approving Advice Letter 4948/4948-A, SCG’s Commercial High Opportunity Projects and Programs (HOPPs)- Commercial Restaurant Retrofit (CRR) Program (discussing TURN’s response) (attached to this request as Attachment 7) supported
212622197.docx