Diversity? Other MEAs? Evaluation Criteria: Efficiency Is the Karst Mainstreaming Quality and comprehensiveness of Project documents Desk review project cost-effective? financial management procedures Project staff Interviews with project Project management costs share of staff total budget Are expenditures in line with Cost of project inputs and outputs Project documents (budget files, Desk review international standards and relative to norms and standards for audit, etc.) Interviews with project norms for development donor projects in the country or Project staff staff projects? region National stakeholders Are management and Appropriateness of structure of Project documents Desk review implementation arrangements management arrangements Project staff Interviews with project efficient in delivering the Extent of necessary partnership staff Local, regional and national outputs necessary to achieve arrangements stakeholders Field visit interviews outcomes? Level of participation of relevant stakeholders Was the Karst Mainstreaming Project milestones in time Project documents Desk review project implementation Required project adaptive Project staff Interviews with project delayed? If so, did that affect management measures related to staff cost-effectiveness? delays What is the contribution of Level of cash and in-kind Project documents Desk review cash and in-kind co-financing relative to expected level Project staff Interviews with project to project implementation? staff To what extent is the Karst Amount of resources leveraged Project documents Desk review Mainstreaming project relative to project budget Project staff Interviews with project leveraging additional staff resources? Evaluation Criteria: Effectiveness Is the project objective likely Level of progress toward project Project documents Field visit interviews to be met? To what extent indicator targets relative to expected Project staff Desk review and in what timeframe? level at current point of Project stakeholders implementation What are the key factors Level of documentation of and Project documents Field visit interviews contributing to project preparation for project risks, Project staff Desk review success or assumptions and impact drivers Project stakeholders underachievement?
Diversity? Other MEAs? Evaluation Criteria: Efficiency Is the Karst Mainstreaming project cost-effective? Quality and comprehensiveness of financial management procedures Project management costs share of total budget Project documents Project staff Desk review Interviews with project staff Are expenditures in line with international standards and norms for development projects? Cost of project inputs and outputs relative to norms and standards for donor projects in the country or region Project documents (budget files, audit, etc.) Project staff National stakeholders Desk review Interviews with project staff Are management and implementation arrangements efficient in delivering the outputs necessary to achieve outcomes? Appropriateness of structure of management arrangements Extent of necessary partnership arrangements Level of participation of relevant stakeholders Project documents Project staff Local, regional and national stakeholders Desk review Interviews with project staff Field visit interviews Was the Karst Mainstreaming project implementation delayed? If so, did that affect cost-effectiveness? Project milestones in time Required project adaptive management measures related to delays Project documents Project staff Desk review Interviews with project staff What is the contribution of cash and in-kind co-financing to project implementation? Level of cash and in-kind relative to expected level Project documents Project staff Desk review Interviews with project staff To what extent is the Karst Mainstreaming project leveraging additional resources? Amount of resources leveraged relative to project budget Project documents Project staff Desk review Interviews with project staff Evaluation Criteria: Effectiveness Is the project objective likely to be met? To what extent and in what timeframe? Level of progress toward project indicator targets relative to expected level at current point of implementation Project documents Project staff Project stakeholders Field visit interviews Desk review What are the key factors contributing to project success or underachievement? Level of documentation of and preparation for project risks, assumptions and impact drivers Project documents Project staff Project stakeholders Field visit interviews Desk review
2723_UNDP_TE_Terminal_Evaluation_Report_Karst_July_2013.docx