4. Was the NOI timely filed? Yes Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding A.16-09-001 Verified number: 6. Date of ALJ ruling: October 27, 2017 Verified 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible Yes government entity status? Showing of or §1803.1(b)) “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding A.16-09-001 Verified number: 10. Date of ALJ ruling: October 27, 2017 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.18-01-024 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or January 17, 2018 Verified Decision: 15. File date of compensation request: March 19, 2018 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Claimed Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Contribution(s) Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Small Business Utility Advocates D.18-01-024 Verified (“Final Decision”). (SBUA) actively participated in Opening Brief of SBUA on the the Priority Review Projects Priority Review Transportation (PRPs) portion of the proceeding, Electrification Proposal from including in discovery, by SDG&E, SCE, and PG&E, served submitting an Opening brief, by on June 16, 2017 (“SBUA joining workshops and Opening Brief”).
4. Was the NOI timely filed? Yes Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: A.16-09-001 Verified 6. Date of ALJ ruling: October 27, 2017 Verified 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible government entity status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) or §1803.1(b)) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: A.16-09-001 Verified 10. Date of ALJ ruling: October 27, 2017 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.18-01-024 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: January 17, 2018 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: March 19, 2018 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion Small Business Utility Advocates (SBUA) actively participated in the Priority Review Projects (PRPs) portion of the proceeding, including in discovery, by submitting an Opening brief, by joining workshops and D.18-01-024 (“Final Decision”). Opening Brief of SBUA on the Priority Review Transportation Electrification Proposal from SDG&E, SCE, and PG&E, served on June 16, 2017 (“SBUA Opening Brief”). Verified
219649416.docx