members to members 2. Education of elected 3. Political 2. Facilitate more officials environment collaboration/ work together - Ex. Farmer subsidy 4. (leg funding) - Eliminate competition - Ex. Need for and RD’s 5. Competing for - Added value prevent. Services time - Open/ honest 3. Education for/of food 6. Time management communication manufacturers 7. Mixed to local →communicate messaging/conflicting vendors info →local businesses →grocery suppliers from →allows education both angles to the consumer by dividing consumer demand through education STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Group 2 (BLUE) 1. Professional 1. New diversity of group with 2. Lack of cultural common interests. diversity 2. Members in all 3. Overwhelming generations. information 3. Statewide 4. Lack of MU student involvement membership 5. Meeting in area - Go to meeting 6. Too many emails 7. Communication - Go to meeting 8. Website- private
members 3. Political environment 4. (leg funding) 5. Competing for time 6. Time management 7. Mixed messaging/conflicting info to members 2. Facilitate more collaboration/ work together - Eliminate competition - Added value - Open/ honest communication 2. Education of elected officials - Ex. Farmer subsidy - Ex. Need for RD’s and prevent. Services 3. Education for/of food manufacturers →communicate to local vendors →local businesses →grocery suppliers →allows education from both angles to the consumer by dividing consumer demand through education Group 2 (BLUE) STRENGTHS 1. Professional diversity of group with common interests. 2. Members in all generations. 3. Statewide WEAKNESSES 1. New 2. Lack of cultural diversity 3. Overwhelming information 4. Lack of MU student involvement membership 5. Meeting in area - Go to meeting 6. Too many emails 7. Communication - Go to meeting 8. Website- private
7-23-15-SWOTanalysis.docx