286 36.04 9.4.2.276 Why is the definition of Modify the Rejected. The WUR AP Count field the count field definition of the specifies the number of convoluted? A count of 0 count field to WUR AP subfields that indicates that one AP reflect the are included in the information field is number of WUR WUR AP List field, present? AP subfields minus one. Therefor included in the count of 0 indicates one list. AP information is present. Similar encoding is used in various fields in the baseline (FSS, TBTT Information Count etc.). 287 36.64 9.4.2.276 "WUR AP subfield" should as in the Rejected. "Transmitting WUR AP be "Transmitting WUR AP comment. Also in subfield" does not subfield". lines 55 and 58. "WUR AP subfield" is correct since the subfield identifies one AP. 357 26.23 9.3.3.11 There is no need for WUR Remove third Rejected. A WUR AP may include Discovery element in the row in the table the WUR Discovery Probe Response frame element in Probe body. Remove it. Response frames that is transmitted in response to a Probe Request frame that contains a WUR Capability element to advertise the WUR discovery channel(s) used by neighboring WUR APs. 372 35.25 9.4.2.276 "The WUR Discovery Specify this as a Rejected. The WUR Discovery element is used to neighbor element carries advertise the WUR information or information about the discovery channels on remove it. WUR Discovery which WUR APs transmit channels of the WUR Discovery frames." transmitting AP itself as Is there any point in well as neighbour APs. advertising this on PCR to Knowledge of the WUR STAs that have already Discovery channels found and are decoding helps WUR STAs to packets on this PCR? track APs (Associated as well as Maybe I just don't even when understand all cases for its PCR is turned off by when WUR Discovery is periodically scanning used, but based on the for WUR Discovery "WUR scanning" concept frames on the in 31.10 I don't see the advertised WUR need for ever advertising Discovery channels. this information on the PCR.
286 36.04 9.4.2.276 Why is the definition of the count field convoluted? A count of 0 indicates that one AP information field is present? Modify the definition of the count field to reflect the number of WUR AP subfields included in the list. Rejected. The WUR AP Count field specifies the number of WUR AP subfields that are included in the WUR AP List field, minus one. Therefor count of 0 indicates one AP information is present. Similar encoding is used in various fields in the baseline (FSS, TBTT Information Count etc.). 287 36.64 9.4.2.276 "WUR AP subfield" should be "Transmitting WUR AP subfield". as in the comment. Also in lines 55 and 58. Rejected. "Transmitting WUR AP subfield" does not "WUR AP subfield" is correct since the subfield identifies one AP. 357 26.23 9.3.3.11 There is no need for WUR Discovery element in the Probe Response frame body. Remove it. Remove third row in the table Rejected. A WUR AP may include the WUR Discovery element in Probe Response frames that is transmitted in response to a Probe Request frame that contains a WUR Capability element to advertise the WUR discovery channel(s) used by neighboring WUR APs. 372 35.25 9.4.2.276 "The WUR Discovery element is used to advertise the WUR discovery channels on which WUR APs transmit WUR Discovery frames." Is there any point in advertising this on PCR to STAs that have already found and are decoding packets on this PCR? Maybe I just don't understand all cases for when WUR Discovery is used, but based on the "WUR scanning" concept in 31.10 I don't see the need for ever advertising this information on the PCR. Specify this as a neighbor information or remove it. Rejected. The WUR Discovery element carries information about the WUR Discovery channels of the transmitting AP itself as well as neighbour APs. Knowledge of the WUR Discovery channels helps WUR STAs to track APs (Associated as well as even when its PCR is turned off by periodically scanning for WUR Discovery frames on the advertised WUR Discovery channels.
11-18-1881-02-00ba-crs-for-wur-discovery-element.docx