Proposed resolution: REVISED Delete and or MMPDU” at 1805.23. “A-MPDU,” “, Identifiers Comment Proposed change CID 3430 Having more than one thing (e.g. "KCK || Use L() as in 11.6.1.3 Mark RISON PMK") on the left of an equals sign is 11.3.5.4 somewhat confusing 1862.56 Discussion: By analogy with 1932.14, 1935.10, 1939.51, 1979.59, it seems that the intent is that the KCK is the first KCK_bits bits of the thing on the right. KCK_bits is 256 here (1862.51: the KCK and PMK shall “both be 256-bits in length”). Proposed resolution: REVISED Change to at 1862.56. || PMK” “KCK “kck_and_pmk” Add = L(kck_and_pmk, 0, 256)” the equation at 1862.56. “KCK Add = L(kck_and_pmk, 256, 256)” after the equation at 1862.56. “PMK In all cases, italicise “kck_and_pmk”. Identifiers Comment Proposed change CID 3462 "Alternate Preferred" -- actually it's not a mere Change to "Overridden" throughout Mark RISON preference, it's an override (10 instances in 8.4.2.76, 10.2.2.16.3, 10.2.2.16.4 and 10.24.8) Discussion: The behaviour involving Preferred” is the following (after CIDs 3459 and 3460 are resolved “Alternate per 15/0126r2, but excluding the premature renaming to Proposed”); key parts are highlighted “Alternate in cyan: If the AP selects an alternate delivery interval or alternate maximum delivery interval from the value specified in the FMS Request, the FMS Status subelement shall be set to one of following values Preferred, due to “Alternate existing stream with different delivery interval”, "Alternate Preferred, due to policy limits on AP", "Alternate Preferred, due to AP changed the delivery interval”, and Preferred, due to AP changed the maximum “Alternate delivery interval”. and the FMS subelement shall indicate the AP selected value(s).”
Proposed resolution: REVISED Delete “A-MPDU,” and “, or MMPDU” at 1805.23. Identifiers Comment Proposed change CID 3430 Mark RISON 11.3.5.4 1862.56 Having more than one thing (e.g. "KCK || PMK") on the left of an equals sign is somewhat confusing Use L() as in 11.6.1.3 Discussion: By analogy with 1932.14, 1935.10, 1939.51, 1979.59, it seems that the intent is that the KCK is the first KCK_bits bits of the thing on the right. KCK_bits is 256 here (1862.51: “both the KCK and PMK shall be 256-bits in length”). Proposed resolution: REVISED Change “KCK || PMK” to “kck_and_pmk” at 1862.56. Add “KCK = L(kck_and_pmk, 0, 256)” the equation at 1862.56. Add “PMK = L(kck_and_pmk, 256, 256)” after the equation at 1862.56. In all cases, italicise “kck_and_pmk”. Identifiers Comment Proposed change CID 3462 Mark RISON "Alternate Preferred" -- actually it's not a mere preference, it's an override Change to "Overridden" throughout (10 instances in 8.4.2.76, 10.2.2.16.3, 10.2.2.16.4 and 10.24.8) Discussion: The behaviour involving “Alternate Preferred” is the following (after CIDs 3459 and 3460 are resolved per 15/0126r2, but excluding the premature renaming to “Alternate Proposed”); key parts are highlighted in cyan: If the AP selects an alternate delivery interval or alternate maximum delivery interval from the value specified in the FMS Request, the FMS Status subelement shall be set to one of following values “Alternate Preferred, due to existing stream with different delivery interval”, "Alternate Preferred, due to policy limits on AP", "Alternate Preferred, due to AP changed the delivery interval”, and “Alternate Preferred, due to AP changed the maximum delivery interval”. and the FMS subelement shall indicate the AP selected value(s).”
11-14-1104-12-000m-resolutions-for-some-mac-pics-and-security-comments-on-11mc-d3-0-lb202.docx