Action Item: Author to include specific changes and revise the document Review document 11-15/254 Solomon TRAININ (Intel) – The document was presented to the group Question on page 3 for the diagram new text should be in the bubble. –the Transitions between the substrates Question on normative change on the transitions between substates The figure may need to be redrawn as it seemed to cause some confusion. Review document 11-15/255 Solomon TRAININ (Intel) – The document was presented to the group Question on the duty cycle of the sleep mode page 2 – The existing text does not have a periodicity The existing definition is used for the DMG in this proposal. The Wake-up schedule element is now expected to be applicable to DMG STA Review document 11-15/256 Solomon TRAININ (Intel) – The document was presented to the group Question on the wakeup schedule how to determine how to change the schedule The plan for these presentations is to have more review offline and then bring back updated documents for consideration at the 2015 May Interim. Review document 11-15/410 Payam TORAB (Broadcom) – Presentation of the document to the group Question on the change of to “may” Need to change the two back to “may” “Shall” This is to ensure that the MCS is from the set expected. The plan is to bring the updated presentation back to the May 2015 Interim Question on other presentations that were made, but a motion was not taken in the past A comment on Sponsor ballot should be made, or a request to put on agenda Comment Resolution: Review 11-13/233r55 LB206 for Discussion Tab 7 comments left – CID 4042 Review Comment Previous proposed resolution reviewed Reject for insufficient detail – Request to all the CIDs with the reject for insufficient detail be considered together after all the others. CID 4037, 4038 and 4039 Comments are similar Review comments Review proposed resolution: - Rejected the text seemed clear – Review context of the CIDs in Draft 4 Possible process options make a motion to either make a change or to – accept the proposed resolution and then process the debate.
Action Item: Author to include specific changes and revise the document Review document 11-15/254 – Solomon TRAININ (Intel) The document was presented to the group Question on page 3 for the diagram –the new text should be in the bubble. Transitions between the substrates Question on normative change on the transitions between substates The figure may need to be redrawn as it seemed to cause some confusion. Review document 11-15/255 – Solomon TRAININ (Intel) The document was presented to the group Question on the duty cycle of the sleep mode – page 2 The existing text does not have a periodicity The existing definition is used for the DMG in this proposal. The Wake-up schedule element is now expected to be applicable to DMG STA Review document 11-15/256 – Solomon TRAININ (Intel) The document was presented to the group Question on the wakeup schedule how to determine how to change the schedule The plan for these presentations is to have more review offline and then bring back updated documents for consideration at the 2015 May Interim. Review document 11-15/410 – Payam TORAB (Broadcom) Presentation of the document to the group Question on the change of to “may” Need to change the two “may” back to “Shall” This is to ensure that the MCS is from the set expected. The plan is to bring the updated presentation back to the May 2015 Interim Question on other presentations that were made, but a motion was not taken in the past A comment on Sponsor ballot should be made, or a request to put on agenda Comment Resolution: Review 11-13/233r55 LB206 for Discussion Tab – 7 comments left CID 4042 Review Comment Previous proposed resolution reviewed – Reject for insufficient detail Request to all the CIDs with the reject for insufficient detail be considered together after all the others. CID 4037, 4038 and 4039 Comments are similar Review comments Review proposed resolution: - Rejected – the text seemed clear Review context of the CIDs in Draft 4 Possible process options – make a motion to either make a change or to accept the proposed resolution and then process the debate.
11-15-0228-01-000m-revmc-minutes-for-march-berlin.docx