Printing of answer script(s) with annotation Provision of auto uploads of Marks file. Evaluation and Reviewer Hands Training. –on Provision of revisiting the Answer script on the same day by Evaluators. Provision of control on Evaluator/ Review logging time in the system to prevent misuse of evaluations Step-by-step Marking of a question. Provision of display of time to evaluation for monitoring of time taken to evaluate an Answer book. The Reporting console should be facilitated to all along with administrative officers as designated by Controller Examination CSVTU Bhilai. Any kind of Deviation in achieving the fixed target would be notified by the service provider to Controller Examination, CSVTU, Bhilai. The report console should be facilitated with print command. Section 5: Evaluation Process 5.1 Overall Bid Evaluation Central Purchase Committee will evaluate and compare the bids determined to be substantially responsive: Substantially Responsive bid: A Substantially responsive bid is one, which conforms to all the requirements, terms, conditions of tender without any material deviations, Deviations from or objections or reservations to critical provisions such as those concerning performance security, warranty applicable laws, taxes and duties will be deemed as material deviation. 5.2 Technical Bid Evaluation The objective of the Technical bid evaluation is to short list bidders who have the technical expertise/skills that are essential to establish/ implement this business activity as envisaged. The technical bids shall be evaluated by the Central Purchase/ Evaluation Committee based on each bidder’s ability to satisfy the requirements set forth in the RFP Document. The Central Purchase Committee will evaluate the technical proposals by taking into account factors mentioned below. The information furnished by the bidder in the technical bid shall be the basis of the evaluation Each of the Technical bids shall be evaluated on a score of 100 points Each Proposal will be evaluated according to the criteria as mentioned in Table-1, but not limited to: Project objective, scope of work and understanding along with past experience in similar nature of project executed. Bidders must demonstrate their experience. The Evaluation Criteria along with the relevant marks for each component is summarized in Table-1.
Printing of answer script(s) with annotation Provision of auto uploads of Marks file. Evaluation and Reviewer Hands –on Training. Provision of revisiting the Answer script on the same day by Evaluators. Provision of control on Evaluator/ Review logging time in the system to prevent misuse of evaluations Step-by-step Marking of a question. Provision of display of time to evaluation for monitoring of time taken to evaluate an Answer book. The Reporting console should be facilitated to all along with administrative officers as designated by Controller Examination CSVTU Bhilai. Any kind of Deviation in achieving the fixed target would be notified by the service provider to Controller Examination, CSVTU, Bhilai. The report console should be facilitated with print command. Section 5: Evaluation Process 5.1 Overall Bid Evaluation Central Purchase Committee will evaluate and compare the bids determined to be substantially responsive: Substantially Responsive bid: A Substantially responsive bid is one, which conforms to all the requirements, terms, conditions of tender without any material deviations, Deviations from or objections or reservations to critical provisions such as those concerning performance security, warranty applicable laws, taxes and duties will be deemed as material deviation. 5.2 Technical Bid Evaluation The objective of the Technical bid evaluation is to short list bidders who have the technical expertise/skills that are essential to establish/ implement this business activity as envisaged. The technical bids shall be evaluated by the Central Purchase/ Evaluation Committee based on each bidder’s ability to satisfy the requirements set forth in the RFP Document. The Central Purchase Committee will evaluate the technical proposals by taking into account factors mentioned below. The information furnished by the bidder in the technical bid shall be the basis of the evaluation Each of the Technical bids shall be evaluated on a score of 100 points Each Proposal will be evaluated according to the criteria as mentioned in Table-1, but not limited to: Project objective, scope of work and understanding along with past experience in similar nature of project executed. Bidders must demonstrate their experience. The Evaluation Criteria along with the relevant marks for each component is summarized in Table-1.
Digital%20Tender%20DVC%20tender%20%202018%20.docx