Crack the code Marking criteria – area Outstanding 18-20 High 15-17 Sound 11-14 Basic 6-10 Limited 0-5 Project Time/action and finance Time/action and finance Time/action and finance Time/action and/or finance Time/action and/or finance management planning is extensive. planning appropriate for the planning has some planning has some plan has limited design project. appropriate aspects to the relevance. connection to the design Project is completed within time design project. project. and financial limitations. Coding and Coding is error free and works in Coding is error free and works Coding appears correct, Coding has errors or is Coding is minimal and/or function the design project. with the MAAS. though does not perform as missing aspects to perform non-existent. intended. intended function. Evidence of error checking ThinkerShield. No evidence of and/or tinkering/adjustment Some evidence of error Little evidence of error checking or Evidence of error checking present. checking and/or tinkering/ checking and/or tinkering/adjusting of the and/or tinkering/adjustment adjustment present. tinkering/adjustment present. code. Design project functions as present. intended to fulfil the brief. Design project has little Design project appears to not Design project does not Design project partially function as intended to fulfil function as intended. function. functions as intended to fulfil the the brief. Physical Project is housed in an Project is housed in an Project is housed in an Project housing is in a Project is not housed but a electronics aesthetically pleasing and aesthetically pleasing and aesthetically pleasing partially completed circuit is present. appropriate case/enclosure. appropriate case/enclosure. and/or appropriate aesthetically pleasing and/or Circuit has faults that are case/enclosure. appropriate case/enclosure. Electronic circuit appears to be Electronic circuit appears to be not identified. fault free and well- constructed. fault free. Electronic circuit appears to Electronic circuit appears to be fault free. have identified faults. Final Evaluation is detailed, objective Evaluation is descriptive Evaluation outlines areas of Evaluation outlines some Evaluation mentions some evaluation and descriptive outlining areas outlining areas of success and success and areas for areas of success and/or of success or for of success and areas for areas for improvement if you improvement if you made areas for improvement. improvement. improvement if you made the made the project again and the project again. project again and why. why.
Crack the code – Marking criteria area Outstanding 18-20 High 15-17 Sound 11-14 Basic 6-10 Limited 0-5 Project management Time/action and finance planning is extensive. Project is completed within time and financial limitations. Time/action and finance planning appropriate for the design project. Time/action and finance planning has some appropriate aspects to the design project. Time/action and/or finance planning has some relevance. Time/action and/or finance plan has limited connection to the design project. Coding and function Coding is error free and works in the design project. Evidence of error checking and/or tinkering/adjustment present. Design project functions as intended to fulfil the brief. Coding is error free and works with the MAAS. ThinkerShield. Evidence of error checking and/or tinkering/adjustment present. Design project partially functions as intended to fulfil the brief. Coding appears correct, though does not perform as intended. Some evidence of error checking and/or tinkering/ adjustment present. Design project has little function as intended to fulfil the Coding has errors or is missing aspects to perform intended function. Little evidence of error checking and/or tinkering/adjustment present. Design project appears to not function as intended. Coding is minimal and/or non-existent. No evidence of checking or tinkering/adjusting of the code. Design project does not function. Physical electronics Project is housed in an aesthetically pleasing and appropriate case/enclosure. Electronic circuit appears to be fault free and well- constructed. Project is housed in an aesthetically pleasing and appropriate case/enclosure. Electronic circuit appears to be fault free. Project is housed in an aesthetically pleasing and/or appropriate case/enclosure. Electronic circuit appears to be fault free. Project housing is in a partially completed aesthetically pleasing and/or appropriate case/enclosure. Electronic circuit appears to have identified faults. Project is not housed but a circuit is present. Circuit has faults that are not identified. Final evaluation Evaluation is detailed, objective and descriptive outlining areas of success and areas for improvement if you made the project again and why. Evaluation is descriptive outlining areas of success and areas for improvement if you made the project again and why. Evaluation outlines areas of success and areas for improvement if you made the project again. Evaluation outlines some areas of success and/or areas for improvement. Evaluation mentions some of success or for improvement.
crack-the-code-student-folio.docx