Graham SMITH (90 mins) Editor Report: Review Draft was sent out to have a 2 week review of the comments that have been edited in. Need to have check done to allow for Dec Draft. Review Doc 11-15/1488r0 Stephen MCCAAN – CID 6200 and CID 6201 (MAC) Review comment Add to the proposed change as bullet #3 : frame “Authentication with Authentication Algorithm Number field equal to 1 (Shared Key) and AuthenticationTtransaction Sequence Number field equal to 3” Change bullet #1 from clause” to 11” “this “Clause Proposed Resolution: REVISED (MAC: 2015-12-08 14:17:50Z):; incorporate the changes as shown in 11-15/1488r1 < for CIDs 6200 and 6201. No objection Mark Ready for Motion – CID 6500 (MAC) Review Comment Discussion on the order field Concern on how the name is renamed (“Frame Control the Order/+HTC”). Changing to was thought to be better “Order/+HTC” than dropping the sense entirely. “order” Swap order of the name as the name of “+HTC/Order” the bit. Check the changes listed to look for any missing locations. Review of potentially duplicated sentences 615.36 and 620.18 Same in different figures but the description is the same. Concern while valid is a different comment. – Proposed Resolution: REVISED (MAC: 2015-12-08 14:26:09Z): Incorporate the changes as in 11-15/1488r1 for CID 6500. No objection Mark for Motion – That Clears the CIDs assigned solo to Stephen 6331 is working with Mark HAMILTON, Stephen has open action item to resolve. 6094 is working with Mark HAMILTON, but Mark has open action item to resolve. Review document 11-15/762r14 Mark – CID 6684 (EDITOR) Review comment 985.58 concern on the plural – – Change replies” with reply” etc. “recipients “recipient Drop semicolon and recipients, leaving does not “and reply otherwise”. 1869.22 change to “so” “therefore”
Graham SMITH (90 mins) Editor Report: Review Draft was sent out to have a 2 week review of the comments that have been edited in. Need to have check done to allow for Dec Draft. Review Doc 11-15/1488r0 – Stephen MCCAAN CID 6200 and CID 6201 (MAC) Review comment Add to the proposed change as bullet #3 : “Authentication frame with Authentication Algorithm Number field equal to 1 (Shared Key) and AuthenticationTtransaction Sequence Number field equal to 3” Change bullet #1 from “this clause” to “Clause 11” Proposed Resolution: REVISED (MAC: 2015-12-08 14:17:50Z):; incorporate the changes as shown in 11-15/1488r1 < for CIDs 6200 and 6201. No objection – Mark Ready for Motion CID 6500 (MAC) Review Comment Discussion on the order field Concern on how the name is renamed (“Frame Control the Order/+HTC”). Changing to “Order/+HTC” was thought to be better than dropping the “order” sense entirely. Swap order of the name “+HTC/Order” as the name of the bit. Check the changes listed to look for any missing locations. Review of potentially duplicated sentences 615.36 and 620.18 Same in different figures but the description is the same. – Concern while valid is a different comment. Proposed Resolution: REVISED (MAC: 2015-12-08 14:26:09Z): Incorporate the changes as in 11-15/1488r1 for CID 6500. No objection – Mark for Motion That Clears the CIDs assigned solo to Stephen 6331 is working with Mark HAMILTON, Stephen has open action item to resolve. 6094 is working with Mark HAMILTON, but Mark has open action item to resolve. Review document 11-15/762r14 – Mark CID 6684 (EDITOR) Review comment 985.58 – concern on the plural – Change “recipients replies” with “recipient reply” etc. Drop semicolon and recipients, leaving “and does not reply otherwise”. 1869.22 change “so” to “therefore”
11-15-1502-01-000m-revmc-brc-minutes-for-f2f-dec-ieee-sa-hosted-piscataway.docx