MU-RTS TF) that it is ready to receive CTS on channels 8270 Pascal Following sentence is as per Rejected- VIGER unclear : "An MPDU comment sent in a broadcast It is designed that 11ax RU of an HE MU receiver has no capability of PPDU shall not simultaneous decoding of include information multiple RUs. So if the a RU intended for a STA is intended for a particular that user, then no other is identified as the should be addressing to that recipient of another user in the MPDU/A-MPDU in RU in the same HE the broadcast RU. MU PPDU." This lets think a broadcast RU TGax editor makes no is not destined to any changes on CID 8270. station. Isn't it a unicast RU instead ? 8294 Patrice "An MPDU sent in a as per Rejected- broadcast RU of an comment HE MU PPDU shall Duplicated CID of CID 8270. not include information intended for a STA that is identified as the recipient of another RU in the same HE MU PPDU." Does it mean that broadcasted RU can not be mixed with any other types of RU ? 8495 Robert DL OFDMA With Describe in Revised- Stacey 56 MIMO PPDU is not of defined. There is no TXVECTOR Agree in principle. There is no such thing as a DL parameters. definition of DL OFDMA with OFDMA With MIMO MIMO PPDU. DL OFDMA Support field. The with MIMO is a feature capability that most defined in Table 9-262aa. closely resembles this is the DL TGax editor makes changes On Partial as shown in 11-17/1286r0 Bandwidth field. that are marked with CID 8495. 8496 Robert "The Type and Remove Rejected- Stacey Subtype subfields ... statement may be different... ": The sentence helps to clarify Meaningless the Type and Subtype statement. settings of MPDUs transmitted in different RU of the same HE MU PPDU
MU-RTS TF) that it is ready to receive CTS on channels 8270 Pascal VIGER Following sentence is unclear : "An MPDU sent in a broadcast RU of an HE MU PPDU shall not include information intended for a STA that is identified as the recipient of another RU in the same HE MU PPDU." This lets think a broadcast RU is not destined to any station. Isn't it a unicast RU instead ? as per comment Rejected- It is designed that 11ax receiver has no capability of simultaneous decoding of multiple RUs. So if the a RU is intended for a particular user, then no other should be addressing to that user in the MPDU/A-MPDU in the broadcast RU. TGax editor makes no changes on CID 8270. 8294 Patrice "An MPDU sent in a broadcast RU of an HE MU PPDU shall not include information intended for a STA that is identified as the recipient of another RU in the same HE MU PPDU." Does it mean that broadcasted RU can not be mixed with any other types of RU ? as per comment Rejected- Duplicated CID of CID 8270. 8495 Robert Stacey DL OFDMA With MIMO PPDU is not defined. There is no such thing as a DL OFDMA With MIMO Support field. The capability that most closely resembles this is the DL On Partial Bandwidth field. Describe in of TXVECTOR parameters. Revised- Agree in principle. There is no definition of DL OFDMA with MIMO PPDU. DL OFDMA with MIMO is a feature defined in Table 9-262aa. TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 8495. 8496 Robert Stacey "The Type and Subtype subfields ... may be different... ": Meaningless statement. Remove statement Rejected- The sentence helps to clarify the Type and Subtype settings of MPDUs transmitted in different RU of the same HE MU PPDU 56
11-17-1286-00-00ax-cr-dl-mu-procedure.docx