Developing undertake further expertise formal in the Evaluation qualifications Unit. in evaluation and related subjects. Fit for Purpose Frequency and Guidelines for Priority Evaluation quality of prioritising and programs are effort is scaled evaluation scaling evaluated. accordingly. is lacking. evaluation activity Evaluations Specialist and are used. use fit for technical skills purpose well developed to appropriate methodologies. Data holdings and Planning at A range of The based collection methods program outset administrative department are insufficient or improves data and other data continually of poor quality. holdings and is used in the develops collection assessment of and applies methods. performance. robust research Developing skills Robust and analytical and knowledge in research and methods to applying robust analytical assess impact research and methods are and outcomes. analytical used to assess Evaluation and methods to impact and performance assess impact outcomes. measurement and outcomes. Evaluations conform to Quality of conform to recognised evaluations is departmental standards of improving. standards. quality. Timely Effort and Evaluation The The resources are activity is department department’s allocated in an ad coordinated. An employs approach to hoc and reactive evaluation plan is strategic evaluation and manner with little in place and performance foresight. regularly planning is Developing monitored. criteria to seen as the performance Strategically prioritise exemplar. information at the significant and evaluation
Developing further expertise in the Evaluation Unit. undertake formal qualifications in evaluation and related subjects. Fit for Purpose Frequency and quality of evaluation is lacking. Guidelines for prioritising and scaling evaluation activity are used. Priority programs are evaluated. Evaluations use fit for purpose Evaluation effort is scaled accordingly. Specialist and technical skills well developed to appropriate methodologies. Data holdings and collection methods are insufficient or of poor quality. Planning at program outset improves data holdings and collection methods. Developing skills and knowledge in applying robust research and analytical methods to assess impact and outcomes. Quality of evaluations is improving. A range of administrative and other data is used in the assessment of performance. Robust research and analytical methods are used to assess impact and outcomes. Evaluations conform to departmental standards. The department continually develops and applies robust research and analytical methods to assess impact and outcomes. Evaluation and performance measurement conform to recognised standards of quality. Timely Effort and resources are allocated in an ad hoc and reactive manner with little foresight. Developing performance information at the Evaluation activity is coordinated. An evaluation plan is in place and regularly monitored. Strategically significant and The department employs strategic criteria to prioritise evaluation The department’s approach to evaluation and performance planning is seen as the exemplar. based
department_of_industry_innovation_and_science_evaluation_strategy_2017-2021.docx