1.4 (S) Models and practices effective methodologies including the use of technology to support student learning. 3.65 (.45) 3.51 (.34) 6.1 (S) Applies effective strategies for dealing with political issues. Professionalism 3.1 (S) Gathers, analyzes, and utilizes data to make decisions curricular, personnel, and 3.62 (.48) 3.38 (.36) physical resources. Thinking Skills 1.5 (D) Utilizes creativity and problem solving skills to improve student learning. 3.73 (.39) 3.65 (.32) Scale: 4—Advanced (A-level), 3—Proficient (B-level), 2—Progressing (C-level), 1/0 Unacceptable (D/F level) K-Knowledge, S-Skill, For full data use link: Tab 3 CF Table displays the breakdown of knowledge, skills, and ; dispositions by conceptual framework dimensions for both oral examinations and practicum ratings. Follow-up Studies Follow-up studies are conducted periodically to determine the performance of candidates in the field after graduation. The latest survey addressed graduates from spring 2008 through fall 2010. Of 46 survey requests, 4 graduates responded. Of those 4 graduates supervisor/employer surveys were then sent to their current employers; 1 employer survey was returned. Survey results should be interpreted with caution due to the very low participation rate. Section 2: Table 7 displays the results. Overall, the limited results indicate that graduates of CSC’s educational administration program believe they are well prepared with scores ranging from 3.31 (.44) for Methodology/Technology to 3.88 (.18) for Thinking Skills. All scores are within the Proficient (3) level. The one supervisor who returned the survey believes the graduate/candidate is very well prepared with an Advanced (4) rating on each conceptual framework dimension. The survey and complete data set may be accessed at the following links: Tabs 1-2, , and . ; Section 2: Table 7 Conceptual Framework Scores for Educational Administration Candidates’ Average Mean Scores/SD for Spring 2008 through Fall 2011 SD SD Skills GPA Relations/ Diversity Leadership Assessment Technology Average/ Average/ Methodology/ Thinking Communication Professionalism Human N=66 Employer Employer Employer Employer Employer Employer Employer Employer Self Self Self Self Self Self Self Self
1.4 (S) Models and practices effective methodologies including the use of technology to support student learning. 3.65 (.45) 3.51 (.34) 6.1 (S) Applies effective strategies for dealing with political issues. Professionalism 3.1 (S) Gathers, analyzes, and utilizes data to make decisions curricular, personnel, and physical resources. 3.62 (.48) 3.38 (.36) Thinking Skills 1.5 (D) Utilizes creativity and problem solving skills to improve student learning. 3.73 (.39) 3.65 (.32) Scale: 4—Advanced (A-level), 3—Proficient (B-level), 2—Progressing (C-level), 1/0 Unacceptable (D/F level) K-Knowledge, S-Skill, For full data use link: ; Tab 3 CF Table displays the breakdown of knowledge, skills, and dispositions by conceptual framework dimensions for both oral examinations and practicum ratings. Follow-up Studies Follow-up studies are conducted periodically to determine the performance of candidates in the field after graduation. The latest survey addressed graduates from spring 2008 through fall 2010. Of 46 survey requests, 4 graduates responded. Of those 4 graduates supervisor/employer surveys were then sent to their current employers; 1 employer survey was returned. Survey results should be interpreted with caution due to the very low participation rate. Section 2: Table 7 displays the results. Overall, the limited results indicate that graduates of CSC’s educational administration program believe they are well prepared with scores ranging from 3.31 (.44) for Methodology/Technology to 3.88 (.18) for Thinking Skills. All scores are within the Proficient (3) level. The one supervisor who returned the survey believes the graduate/candidate is very well prepared with an Advanced (4) rating on each conceptual framework dimension. The survey and complete data set may be accessed at the following links: ; Tabs 1-2, , and . Section 2: Table 7 Conceptual Framework Scores for Educational Administration Candidates’ Average Mean Scores/SD for Spring 2008 through Fall 2011 GPA Leadership Assessment Communication Human Relations/ Diversity Methodology/ Technology Professionalism Thinking Skills Average/ SD Average/ SD N=66 Self Employer Self Employer Self Employer Self Employer Self Employer Self Employer Self Employer Self Employer
Education%20Administration%20Rule%2024%20Folio.docx