IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Comment resolutions on miscellaneous CIDs in 9.9.1.4 Date: Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email Jae Seung Lee ETRI 161 Gajeong-dong, +82 42 860 1326 jasonlee@etri.re.kr Yuseong-gu, Cheong 161 Gajeong-dong, +82 42 860 5635 ETRI Yuseong-gu, Sok-kyu Lee 161 Gajeong-dong, +82 42 860 5919 sk-lee@etri.re.kr ETRI Yuseong-gu, Comments on RIFS (CID 114, 1492, and 1715) 114 Au, 52 5 TR For the rule in clause Delete the Agree in MAC principle. 9.2.0b.4.2 that a VHT sentence "(or RIFS, The use STA shall not transmit under the of RIFS is (Kwok frames separated by a conditions defined Shum) RIFS, the sentence in 9.3.2.4.2 (RIFS))" for "(or RIFS, under the VHT conditions defined in STAs. 9.3.2.4.2 (RIFS))" should be deleted. Lv, 52 5 TR the term "STA" here change "STA" to Agree. MAC Changed Kaiying is not "TXOP holder" the text 52 6 TR Is it correct to include Agree in MAC principle. RIFS here, because The use RIFS is deleted in VHT. of RIFS is for VHT STAs. Discussion Agree in principle. Since the use of RIFS is already deprecated for VHT STAs, a VHT STA shall not transmit frames separated by a RIFS. Although it is already specified in 9.3.2.4.2 of TGac Draft 0.4, we propose to specify it in the sentence for clarity.
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Comment resolutions on miscellaneous CIDs in 9.9.1.4 Date: Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email Jae Seung Lee ETRI 161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, +82 42 860 1326 jasonlee@etri.re.kr Cheong ETRI 161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, +82 42 860 5635 Sok-kyu Lee ETRI 161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, +82 42 860 5919 sk-lee@etri.re.kr Comments on RIFS (CID 114, 1492, and 1715) 114 Au, (Kwok Shum) 52 5 TR For the rule in clause 9.2.0b.4.2 that a VHT STA shall not transmit frames separated by a RIFS, the sentence "(or RIFS, under the conditions defined in 9.3.2.4.2 (RIFS))" should be deleted. Delete the sentence "(or RIFS, under the conditions defined in 9.3.2.4.2 (RIFS))" Agree in principle. The use of RIFS is for VHT STAs. MAC Lv, Kaiying 52 5 TR the term "STA" here is not change "STA" to "TXOP holder" Agree. Changed the text MAC 52 6 TR Is it correct to include RIFS here, because RIFS is deleted in VHT. Agree in principle. The use of RIFS is for VHT STAs. MAC Discussion Agree in principle. Since the use of RIFS is already deprecated for VHT STAs, a VHT STA shall not transmit frames separated by a RIFS. Although it is already specified in 9.3.2.4.2 of TGac Draft 0.4, we propose to specify it in the sentence for clarity.
11-11-0705-00-00ac-comment-resolutions-on-miscellaneous-cids-in-9-9-1-4.docx