RS19, RS20 SRH No Counter Service Cabinet, 12 equivalent 30% NA (Horizontal) refrigerated Horizontal registered with door Refrigerator SRV Storage IVC4 Solid cabinet types Service Cabinet, 13 Vertical door 30% NA are defined Refrigerated, Vertical M1 & M2 Integral into four with solid door Refrigerated categories Storage SFH (but not cabinet No classified by Counter Service Cabinet, 14 equivalent 30% NA (Horizontal) the technical Freezer, Horizontal registered standards yet) with solid door Freezer SFV IVF4 Solid Service Cabinet 15 Vertical doors 30% NA Freezer, Vertical with L1 & L2 solid door Overall effect (Groups 1 to 11) 30% 13.4% Costs and Benefits Figure 15 the reduction in energy consumption over time due to Option3, there is also a corresponding greenhouse gas emissions when compared with BAU, but these are not significant when compared with other scenarios (see Options 4 below). Figure 15: Annual energy consumption from Option 3. 14 shows the modelled impacts of Option 3 and indicates the net benefits to Australia of $AU798 million and to New Zealand of NZ$51 million and the benefit to cost ratios are 8:1 and 4.5:1 respectively. Table 14 Evaluation of impacts Option 3. – Indicator Appliances installed 2017 - 2035 Australia New Zealand Energy Savings 6406GWh 1142GWh Emissions savings (CO2-e cumulative) 4.76Mt 147kt Benefits $AU912 million $NZ66 million million $NZ15 million Net Present Value million $NZ51 million Benefit cost ratio 8:1 4.5:1 Further details of the modelling and assumptions are at Attachment C.
RS19, RS20 12 SRH Service Cabinet, refrigerated Horizontal with door Integral Refrigerated Storage cabinet Refrigerator Counter (Horizontal) No equivalent registered Storage cabinet types are defined into four categories (but not classified by the technical standards yet) 30% NA 13 SRV Service Cabinet, Refrigerated, Vertical with solid door Vertical IVC4 Solid door M1 & M2 30% NA 14 SFH Service Cabinet, Freezer, Horizontal with solid door Freezer Counter (Horizontal) No equivalent registered 30% NA 15 SFV Service Cabinet Freezer, Vertical with solid door Vertical IVF4 Solid doors L1 & L2 30% NA Overall effect (Groups 1 to 11) 30% 13.4% Costs and Benefits Figure 15 the reduction in energy consumption over time due to Option3, there is also a corresponding greenhouse gas emissions when compared with BAU, but these are not significant when compared with other scenarios (see Options 4 below). Figure 15: Annual energy consumption from Option 3. 14 shows the modelled impacts of Option 3 and indicates the net benefits to Australia of $AU798 million and to New Zealand of NZ$51 million and the benefit to cost ratios are 8:1 and 4.5:1 respectively. Table 14 Evaluation of impacts – Option 3. Indicator Appliances installed 2017 - 2035 Australia New Zealand Energy Savings 6406GWh 1142GWh Emissions savings (CO2-e cumulative) 4.76Mt 147kt Benefits $AU912 million $NZ66 million million $NZ15 million Net Present Value million $NZ51 million Benefit cost ratio 8:1 4.5:1 Further details of the modelling and assumptions are at Attachment C.
Decision_RIS_Commercial_Refrigeration_FINAL.docx