IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Comment resolution Date: 2018-01-24 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email strainin@qti.qualcomm.com Solomon Trainin Qualcomm CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1101 130.04 10.24.12.5 The buffered MSDUs in the Flushing the buffer can be receive reordering buffer done when the Duration control can be flushed time indicated in the last when the STA stops received MPDU has receiving from the <TA, elapsed TID> pair the statement "Stop receiving" need to be better defined Proposal: Revise Discussion: The proposed change is not adequate in relation to the intention of the feature as it is presented “…ability of the recipient to flush the buffers when it starts receiving from a different originator or TID.” that the transmission with no need to flush the buffer may be longer than single TXOP or SP. Proposed change resolves the commented issue and aligns the normative text with the text at start of the sub clause. TGay Editor: Modify the text in P130L4 as follows: The buffered in the receive reordering buffer control can be flushed when the STA receiving from different <TA, TID> pair. 1645 115.35 10.24.2 SAR is an optional feature as Please clarify indicated by this paragraph, so it is necessary for the upper layer to do the segmentation if SAR is not supported. Should SAR be a mandatory one to truly reflect the design purpose? Proposal: Reject Discussion:
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Comment resolution Date: 2018-01-24 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email Solomon Trainin Qualcomm strainin@qti.qualcomm.com CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1101 130.04 10.24.12.5 The buffered MSDUs in the receive reordering buffer control can be flushed when the STA stops receiving from the <TA, TID> pair the statement "Stop receiving" need to be better defined Flushing the buffer can be done when the Duration time indicated in the last received MPDU has elapsed Proposal: Revise Discussion: The proposed change is not adequate in relation to the intention of the feature as it is presented “…ability of the recipient to flush the buffers when it starts receiving from a different originator or TID.” that the transmission with no need to flush the buffer may be longer than single TXOP or SP. Proposed change resolves the commented issue and aligns the normative text with the text at start of the sub clause. TGay Editor: Modify the text in P130L4 as follows: The buffered in the receive reordering buffer control can be flushed when the STA receiving from different <TA, TID> pair. 1645 115.35 10.24.2 SAR is an optional feature as indicated by this paragraph, so it is necessary for the upper layer to do the segmentation if SAR is not supported. Should SAR be a mandatory one to truly reflect the design purpose? Please clarify Proposal: Reject Discussion:
11-18-0278-01-00ay-comment-resolution-of-multiple-cids-in-relation-to-sub-clause-10-24.docx