16879 802.19 comment Analysis of noise Rejected from Timothy floor impact to low Harrington: Analysis power -41.3 dBm This is not a comment on the of noise floor impact devices using amendment, however with respect to the CA to low power -41.3 802.15.4 compliant document: dBm devices IR devices with IR radios at different radios at different The IEEE 802 distances were not distances should be LMSC OPERATIONS MANUAL states as performed performed follows "The CA document shall address coexistence with all relevant approved IEEE 802 LMSC wireless standards specifying devices for unlicensed operation. The WG should consider other specifications in their identified target band(s) in the CA document." 802.11 coexistence with non-802.11 systems is addressed in Section 3 of the CA document. There is no LMSC requirement for analysis or simulation or testing. CA document has been amended to acknowledge UWB with the relevant regulations. Refer to
16879 802.19 comment from Timothy Harrington: Analysis of noise floor impact to low power -41.3 dBm devices IR radios at different distances were not performed Analysis of noise floor impact to low power -41.3 dBm devices using 802.15.4 compliant devices with IR radios at different distances should be performed Rejected This is not a comment on the amendment, however with respect to the CA document: The IEEE 802 LMSC OPERATIONS MANUAL states as follows "The CA document shall address coexistence with all relevant approved IEEE 802 LMSC wireless standards specifying devices for unlicensed operation. The WG should consider other specifications in their identified target band(s) in the CA document." 802.11 coexistence with non-802.11 systems is addressed in Section 3 of the CA document. There is no LMSC requirement for analysis or simulation or testing. CA document has been amended to acknowledge UWB with the relevant regulations. Refer to
11-18-1532-01-00ax-tgax-coexistence-assurance-document-comments.docx