2. May be better to define it as [1/sqrt2, sqr(2)] Discussions: Although is still normalized by, the term is common to all RUs. Hence, it is correct to say that is the power boost factor for the r-th RU. The correct definition of is givein in 28.3.9. ax editor: please make the following change in D2.1 Clause 28.3.10.9 On P437L49 (CID #11414) 11533 Dorothy 434.15 Eq 28-22 is not clear. As in Revised. comment Stanley Change to as in Both equations have a the resolution of value at HES_0. The CID11533 in doc top equation has the value (1+j)/sqrt(2), but bottom equation has the value 0. Which is it? 11534 Dorothy 434.64 Eq 28-28 is not As in Revised. comment Stanley Change to as in Both equations have a the resolution of value at HES_248 and CID11534 in doc HES_-248. The top equation has the value (1+j)/sqrt(2) and (-1-j)/sqrt(2), but bottom equation has the value 0. Which is it? 11535 Dorothy 435.01 Eq 28-29 is not As in Revised. comment Stanley Change to as in Both equations have a the resolution of value at HES_504 and CID11535 in doc HES_-504. Which is it? Eq 28-30 is not clear. As in 11642 Dorothy 435.14 Revised. comment Change to as in Stanley Both equations have a the resolution of value at HES_1016 CID11642 in doc and HES_-1016 and HES_8 and HES_-8. Which is it? 11643 Dorothy 435.27 Eq 28-31 is not clear. As in Revised. comment Stanley Change to as in Both equations have a the resolution of value at HES_504 and CID11643 in doc
2. May be better to define it as [1/sqrt2, sqr(2)] Discussions: Although is still normalized by, the term is common to all RUs. Hence, it is correct to say that is the power boost factor for the r-th RU. The correct definition of is givein in 28.3.9. ax editor: please make the following change in D2.1 Clause 28.3.10.9 On P437L49 (CID #11414) 11533 Dorothy Stanley 434.15 Eq 28-22 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_0. The top equation has the value (1+j)/sqrt(2), but bottom equation has the value 0. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11533 in doc 11534 Dorothy Stanley 434.64 Eq 28-28 is not Both equations have a value at HES_248 and HES_-248. The top equation has the value (1+j)/sqrt(2) and (-1-j)/sqrt(2), but bottom equation has the value 0. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11534 in doc 11535 Dorothy Stanley 435.01 Eq 28-29 is not Both equations have a value at HES_504 and HES_-504. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11535 in doc 11642 Dorothy Stanley 435.14 Eq 28-30 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_1016 and HES_-1016 and HES_8 and HES_-8. Which is it? As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11642 in doc 11643 Dorothy Stanley 435.27 Eq 28-31 is not clear. Both equations have a value at HES_504 and As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11643 in doc
11-18-0110-04-00ax-11ax-comment-resolutions-for-phy-preamble.docx