for a certain protocol is relatively amount of time. simple and will do no How a STA harm to the HE BSS determines it is operation. part of this set is not defined. What the AP does as a result of a setup exchange is not defined either. 8422 80.10 The QPT Support Remove the Rejected: The proposed capability is not QPT Support feature provides an HE AP clear. QPT field with a tool to mitigate operation is not interference when there defined. are peer-to-peer operations in the HE BSS. The operation and companion elements of the operation are defined in is defined in 9.4.2.224. 8244 207.01 27.16.3 What is the impact discuss the Rejected: It is up to an AP of Quieting all (or impact on BSS to decide whether to most of the STAs) throughput enable the time on the BSS period. The algorithm is throughput. Has out of scope of the there been any specification. Any impact study to quantify to HE BSS throughput if the impact? any is due to AP’s decision not because of the protocol. 8245 207.01 27.16.3 There are many Define the Rejected: The references in this missing (peer-to-peer) clause that this operations signalling is not part of the feature is intended feature. It is up to the for STA-to-STA peer-to-peer protocol to operation. define the signalling However this protocol. This feature operation is not compliments the defined together operation. with the signaling and communication 8289 207.04 There is a The MU EDCA Revised: Agree with the configuration for mode is not able comment. The revised text EDCA contention to support is included in 27.16.4.1. between Quiet STA2STA time period mode communication. and MU EDCA Instead of Parameter mode: applying a when a STA has penalty of both traffic to EDCA
for a certain amount of time. How a STA determines it is part of this set is not defined. What the AP does as a result of a setup exchange is not defined either. protocol is relatively simple and will do no harm to the HE BSS operation. 8422 80.10 The QPT Support capability is not clear. QPT operation is not defined. Remove the QPT Support field Rejected: The proposed feature provides an HE AP with a tool to mitigate interference when there are peer-to-peer operations in the HE BSS. The operation and companion elements of the operation are defined in is defined in 9.4.2.224. 8244 207.01 27.16.3 What is the impact of Quieting all (or most of the STAs) on the BSS throughput. Has there been any study to quantify the impact? discuss the impact on BSS throughput Rejected: It is up to an AP to decide whether to enable the time period. The algorithm is out of scope of the specification. Any impact to HE BSS throughput if any is due to AP’s decision not because of the protocol. 8245 207.01 27.16.3 There are many references in this clause that this feature is intended for STA-to-STA operation. However this operation is not defined together with the signaling and communication Define the missing operations Rejected: The (peer-to-peer) signalling is not part of the feature. It is up to the peer-to-peer protocol to define the signalling protocol. This feature compliments the operation. 8289 207.04 There is a for EDCA contention between Quiet time period mode and MU EDCA Parameter mode: when a STA has both traffic to configuration The MU EDCA mode is not able to support STA2STA communication. Instead of applying a penalty of EDCA Revised: Agree with the comment. The revised text is included in 27.16.4.1.
11-17-1009-01-00ax-quiet-time-period-part-3-27-26-3-x.docx