TXVECTOR/RXVECTOR table such as EXPANSION_MAT and CHAN_MAT_TYPE etc. though those otherwise’s are not applied to TVWS devices. 1619 241.35 24.2.2 Minho "not for channel Need to provide REVISE. Hart sounding" hides a the reader with whole lot of capability the hint that this is Please refer to a MAC frame doc. 14/0597r3. encapsulated in the PLCP header <Discussion> As the commenterd pointed out, I changed its expression to make it clearer by referring to the expression used in 8.3.5 (NDP MAC frames). 1616 Brian 241.43 24.2.2 Minho "Determine the Need to make this REVISE. Hart contents of S1G NDP more clear "For MAC Frame. Set to NDP PPDUs this Please refer to concatenated bit fields contains a terse doc. 14/0597r3. for the SIG of the MAC frame (see corresponding NDP 8.3.5 and MAC Frame" is very subclauses) to be vague - what is encapsulated happening here? Are within the SIG the bit fields supposed field to be the numeric fields in Table 8-41? ... upon further reading, actually no. Basically this is very unhelpful as written ...
TXVECTOR/RXVECTOR table such as EXPANSION_MAT and CHAN_MAT_TYPE etc. though those otherwise’s are not applied to TVWS devices. 1619 Hart 241.35 24.2.2 Minho "not for channel sounding" hides a whole lot of capability Need to provide the reader with the hint that this is a MAC frame encapsulated in the PLCP header REVISE. Please refer to doc. 14/0597r3. <Discussion> As the commenterd pointed out, I changed its expression to make it clearer by referring to the expression used in 8.3.5 (NDP MAC frames). 1616 Brian Hart 241.43 24.2.2 Minho "Determine the contents of S1G NDP MAC Frame. Set to concatenated bit fields for the SIG of the corresponding NDP MAC Frame" is very vague - what is happening here? Are the bit fields supposed to be the numeric fields in Table 8-41? ... upon further reading, actually no. Basically this is very unhelpful as written ... Need to make this more clear "For NDP PPDUs this contains a terse MAC frame (see 8.3.5 and subclauses) to be encapsulated within the SIG field REVISE. Please refer to doc. 14/0597r3.
11-14-0597-03-00ah-lb200-phy-comment-resolutions-24-2-2.docx