plaintiff for the expense of litigation.” Second, it is implausible the jury, in order to Id. “that eliminate the chance that Collins might be awarded attorney fees, took the disproportionate step of returning a verdict against him even though it believed he was the victim of age discrimination, notwithstanding the District Court's clear instructions to the contrary.” Id.; see at 658 (distinguishing 234 F.3d 312, 319 (6th Cir. 2000), and also id. Fisher v. City of Memphis, 938 F.2d 1048, 1051 (9th Cir. 1991)). Brooks v. Cook,
plaintiff for the expense of litigation.” Id. Second, it is implausible “that the jury, in order to eliminate the chance that Collins might be awarded attorney fees, took the disproportionate step of returning a verdict against him even though it believed he was the victim of age discrimination, notwithstanding the District Court's clear instructions to the contrary.” Id.; see also id. at 658 (distinguishing Fisher v. City of Memphis, 234 F.3d 312, 319 (6th Cir. 2000), and Brooks v. Cook, 938 F.2d 1048, 1051 (9th Cir. 1991)).
10_Chap_10_2017_March_.docx