Berezovsk TPP 1965 1415 1415 4202 33.9% Source: Belenergo; Lukoml TPP 1970 2889 2889 8809 34.8% Consultant for Novopolotsk CHP 455 215 713 37.9% grouping Gomel CHP-2 1985 544 544 1305 27.4% Table 37: Svetlogorsk CHP 155 147 317 24.6% Belarus Existing Mozyr CHP 2000 205 199 469 26.9% Power Plant Grodno CHP-2 1975 302 267 1504 64.3% Groupings (Summary) CHP-3 with GT 2009 542 442 2118 54.7% CHP-5 with GT 2010 720 720 3678 58.3% Minsk CHP-4 1996 1035 1035 3477 38.3% Mogilev CHP-2 347 272 602 25.3% Bobruisk CHP-2 183 163 507 35.5% Plant Plant Group Berezovskya 1 Lukoml 2 Mozyr, Minsk CHP-4 3 Minsk CHP-5 4 CHP-3 5 Novopolotsk, Gomel, Grodno, Svetlogorsk, 6 Mogilev, Bobruisk Power plant efficiencies were set according to an analysis of plant performance statistics 2012 2014 – provided by Belenergo.
Berezovsk TPP 1965 1415 1415 4202 33.9% Lukoml TPP 1970 2889 2889 8809 34.8% Novopolotsk CHP 455 215 713 37.9% Gomel CHP-2 1985 544 544 1305 27.4% Svetlogorsk CHP 155 147 317 24.6% Mozyr CHP 2000 205 199 469 26.9% Grodno CHP-2 1975 302 267 1504 64.3% CHP-3 with GT 2009 542 442 2118 54.7% CHP-5 with GT 2010 720 720 3678 58.3% Minsk CHP-4 1996 1035 1035 3477 38.3% Mogilev CHP-2 347 272 602 25.3% Bobruisk CHP-2 183 163 507 35.5% Source: Belenergo; Consultant for grouping Table 37: Belarus Existing Power Plant Groupings (Summary) Plant Plant Group Berezovskya 1 Lukoml 2 Mozyr, Minsk CHP-4 3 Minsk CHP-5 4 CHP-3 5 Novopolotsk, Gomel, Grodno, Svetlogorsk, Mogilev, Bobruisk 6 Power plant efficiencies were set according to an analysis of plant performance statistics 2012 – 2014 provided by Belenergo.
CWP.BY.03_Report_draft_final_20160409.docx