ANNUAL EVALUATION - DEPARTMENT HEAD SUPPLEMENTAL EVALUATION PERIOD JANUARY 1, THRU DECEMBER 31, Name: Department: PIN: Pursuant to the TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-COMMERCE PROCEDURES 12.01.99.R0.02 Annual Evaluation of Faculty and 12.01.99.R0.04 Academic Administrator Evaluation, academic administrators…are evaluated according to their relative success in working with people, programs, policies, procedures and finances. This annual evaluation supplement along with the attached Annual Evaluation Report covers the previous calendar year. 1. Recruiting a diverse faculty Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) CHECK ONE: Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 2. Providing faculty development opportunities Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) CHECK ONE: Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 3. Conducting effective faculty evaluation Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) CHECK ONE: Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 4. Developing curriculum Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) Exceeds CHECK ONE: Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 5. Maintaining standards of quality Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) CHECK ONE: Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 6. Establishing appropriate budgeting procedures and managing fiscal and educational resources Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) CHECK ONE: Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5)
ANNUAL EVALUATION - DEPARTMENT HEAD SUPPLEMENTAL EVALUATION PERIOD JANUARY 1, THRU DECEMBER 31, Name: Department: PIN: Pursuant to the TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-COMMERCE PROCEDURES 12.01.99.R0.02 Annual Evaluation of Faculty and 12.01.99.R0.04 Academic Administrator Evaluation, academic administrators…are evaluated according to their relative success in working with people, programs, policies, procedures and finances. This annual evaluation supplement along with the attached Annual Evaluation Report covers the previous calendar year. 1. Recruiting a diverse faculty CHECK ONE: Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 2. Providing faculty development opportunities CHECK ONE: Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 3. Conducting effective faculty evaluation CHECK ONE: Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 4. Developing curriculum CHECK ONE: Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 5. Maintaining standards of quality CHECK ONE: Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5) REMARKS REQUIRED: 6. Establishing appropriate budgeting procedures and managing fiscal and educational resources CHECK ONE: Does Not Meet Expectations (1) Partially Meets Expectations (2) Meets Expectations (3) Exceeds Expectations (4) Significantly Exceeds Expectations (5)
Department_Head_Supplemental.rev2018.docx