IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs TGah D0.1 Comment Collections 9 Resolutions on 24.3.8 Sections Date: 2013-07-15 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Qualcomm 5775 Morehouse Dr. San Diego, Eugene Baik Technologies, 858-658-2568 eugeneb@qti.qualcomm.com CA 92122 Inc. Abstract: This document contains proposed resolutions for the following CIDs from TGah D0.1 Comment Collection 9: 145, 190, 270, 271, 272, 273, 298, 299, 872, 873, 880 Clause 24.3.8: CIDs for Clause 24.3.8 CID Section Page Line Comment Proposed Change Resolution 270 Kenichi 239 16 Maybe, section Maybe, correct Accepted Mori 2 24.3.8.2.2.1.2 is section is typo because this "24.3.8.2.1.2". section indicates itself. 271 Kenichi 24.3.8.3.2 253 52 The section 3.2.1.2 [0.5, -1, 1, -1, -1, Rejected. The Mori of the SFD existing ╬│ indicates "[0.5, -1, where is a notation is ╬│ 1, -1, -1, - normalization equivalent factor, and more is a = 2.4 for MCS0 accurate in ╬│ ╬│ normalization rep2, 1.7 context of the factor otherwise. overall STF = 2.4 for equation, in ╬│ MCS0 rep2, 1.7 that the sum otherwise" but this power of the explanation is populated different. Should tones is 6 (and be revised as the equal to the SFD. number of populated tones)
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs TGah D0.1 Comment Collections 9 Resolutions on 24.3.8 Sections Date: 2013-07-15 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Eugene Baik Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. 5775 Morehouse Dr. San Diego, CA 92122 858-658-2568 eugeneb@qti.qualcomm.com Abstract: This document contains proposed resolutions for the following CIDs from TGah D0.1 Comment Collection 9: Clause 24.3.8: 145, 190, 270, 271, 272, 273, 298, 299, 872, 873, 880 CIDs for Clause 24.3.8 CID Section Page Line Comment Proposed Change Resolution 270 Kenichi Mori 239 16 Maybe, section 24.3.8.2.2.1.2 is typo because this section indicates itself. Maybe, correct section is "24.3.8.2.1.2". Accepted 271 Kenichi Mori 24.3.8.3.2 253 52 The section 3.2.1.2 of the SFD indicates "[0.5, -1, 1, -1, -1, ╬│ is a normalization factor - ╬│ = 2.4 for MCS0 rep2, 1.7 otherwise" but this explanation is different. Should be revised as the SFD. [0.5, -1, 1, -1, -1, ╬│ where ╬│ is a normalization factor, ╬│ = 2.4 for MCS0 rep2, 1.7 otherwise. Rejected. The existing notation is equivalent and more accurate in context of the overall STF equation, in that the sum power of the populated tones is 6 (and equal to the number of populated tones) 2
11-13-0766-00-00ah-draft0-1-comment-res-for-24-3-8.docx