9035 Alfred 91.26 9.3.1.1 The "Next TWT Info Replace "Next TWT Revised the TGah – Present field" is Info Present" with editor shall replace using the location Management" "Next TWT Info that was signaling and "Reserved" with Present" with "Power Next TWT Info "Power Management" for a Present". Same Management" and non-AP STA. Since consideration for "Reserved" with this is overloaded STACK/BAT in Next TWT Info then non-AP STA 9.8.4.1. Present". Same transmitting this consideration for frame cannot STACK/BAT in indicate a PM 9.8.4.1. switch. Instead of having this PM limitation suggest using B15 for Next TWT Info Present and leave B12 as PM. 9038 Alfred 154.52 Two issues, one Issue 1: "shall" Revised in – obvious and the cannot be used in subclause 9.4.2.196 other one as well. this subclause so TWT element, TGah maybe replace by editor shall delete will. Issue 2 that can the sentence “A supercede the first TWT requesting one. This sentence STA, which is an was added because AP shall set the of a comment value of the Flow stating that AP cannot send Type subfield to as such it 1.” and after the cannot ask for an second to last announced TWT, paragraph of limiting its behavior. 10.44.1 TWT instead of that why not simply say that overview, the an AP simply sends TGah editor shall trigger frames, and add a note with the not PS-Polls? following text: - A TWT “NOTE requesting STA that is an AP does not send PS-Poll frames, but it can send APSD trigger frames.” Discussion: None. Proposed changes
9035 Alfred 91.26 9.3.1.1 The "Next TWT Info Present field" is using the location that was signaling "Power Management" for a non-AP STA. Since this is overloaded then non-AP STA transmitting this frame cannot indicate a PM switch. Instead of having this PM limitation suggest using B15 for Next TWT Info Present and leave B12 as PM. Replace "Next TWT Info Present" with Management" and "Reserved" with Next TWT Info Present". Same consideration for STACK/BAT in 9.8.4.1. Revised – the TGah editor shall replace "Next TWT Info Present" with "Power Management" and "Reserved" with Next TWT Info Present". Same consideration for STACK/BAT in 9.8.4.1. 9038 Alfred 154.52 Two issues, one obvious and the other one as well. Issue 1: "shall" cannot be used in this subclause so maybe replace by will. Issue 2 that can supercede the first one. This sentence was added because of a comment stating that AP cannot send as such it cannot ask for an announced TWT, limiting its behavior. instead of that why not simply say that an AP simply sends trigger frames, and not PS-Polls? Revised – in subclause 9.4.2.196 TWT element, TGah editor shall delete the sentence “A TWT requesting STA, which is an AP shall set the value of the Flow Type subfield to 1.” and after the second to last paragraph of 10.44.1 TWT overview, the TGah editor shall add a note with the following text: “NOTE - A TWT requesting STA that is an AP does not send PS-Poll frames, but it can send APSD trigger frames.” Discussion: None. Proposed changes
11-16-0470-00-00ah-sb1-cid9035-cid9038.docx