It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8437 "10.50 S1G BSS Move the full subclause Rejected- operation": this subclause "10.50 S1G BSS operation", 10.50 (S1G BSS specifies basic MAC except for 10.50.7, to a new operation) is describing functionality, not just subclause 9.42. the BSS operation. MLME features, so it does Its reference section is not belong in the MLME 10.40 (VHT BSS clause. operation) and 10.43 TVHT BSS functionality) in IEEE 802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8440 "S1G BSS type and STA Move subclause 10.50.7 to Rejected- type": what is such a a location between 9.2.5 The BRC can not identify specification of a general and 9.2.6 (so it becomes the operation is operation doing buried at new 9.2.6). considered as the MAC the end of the MLME functionality. clause? This material does not belong in the So, the comment fails to MLME clause. identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8442 "Support for energy After the TG creates the Rejected- limited STAs": this new subclause 9.42 on S1G The BRC can not identify subclause is a operations, rename this operation is specification of functional subclause "9.42.9 Support considered as the MAC operations, not just MLME for energy limited STAs". functionality. components. Move it into the MAC functional So, the comment fails to specification. identify a specific issue to be addressed.
It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8437 "10.50 S1G BSS operation": this subclause specifies basic MAC functionality, not just MLME features, so it does not belong in the MLME clause. Move the full subclause "10.50 S1G BSS operation", except for 10.50.7, to a new subclause 9.42. Rejected- 10.50 (S1G BSS operation) is describing the BSS operation. Its reference section is 10.40 (VHT BSS operation) and 10.43 TVHT BSS functionality) in IEEE 802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8440 "S1G BSS type and STA type": what is such a specification of a general operation doing buried at the end of the MLME clause? This material does not belong in the MLME clause. Move subclause 10.50.7 to a location between 9.2.5 and 9.2.6 (so it becomes the new 9.2.6). Rejected- The BRC can not identify operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8442 "Support for energy limited STAs": this subclause is a specification of functional operations, not just MLME components. Move it into the MAC functional specification. After the TG creates the new subclause 9.42 on S1G operations, rename this subclause "9.42.9 Support for energy limited STAs". Rejected- The BRC can not identify operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed.
11-16-0020-01-00ah-sb0-comment-resolution-part5.docx