CID Commenter Clause Page/Line Comment Proposed Resolution Change Chunyu Hu 28.3.10.8.6 432.32 There is no as in the Revised definition of load comment Editor please balancing before make changes usage. Load shown in balancing is a document general term in under network, but is comment 11496 complete new in this new context of HE SIG-B. It's not clear what it means in this section. Please define it before using it in the text of behavior description. 11530 Dorothy 28.3.10.8.5 426.48 something is weird as in comment Revised. Stanley with the Editor: remove the gap above that formatting. Its sentence and add a seems like "Use gap below it. Also the same value in change that sentence both HE-SIG-B as follows: content channels." Use The same value is should be part of applied to in both the 80 MHz content description, but its channels looks like its in the paragraph with the 160 MHz section. Please clarify. 11636 Dorothy 28.3.10.7.2 405.25 The title of Table as in comment Revised. Stanley 28-18 is Editor please field of an HE make changes SU PPDU and HE shown in ER SU PPDU", so document why would B0 of under HE-SIG-A1 ever comment 11636 be "set to 0 for HE TB PPDU"? You probably just want to say "set to 1 for HE SU PPDU and HE ER SU PPDU", and not say anything about HE TB PPDU.
CID Commenter Clause Page/Line Comment Proposed Change Resolution Chunyu Hu 28.3.10.8.6 432.32 There is no definition of load balancing before usage. Load balancing is a general term in network, but is complete new in this new context of HE SIG-B. It's not clear what it means in this section. Please define it before using it in the text of behavior description. as in the comment Revised Editor please make changes shown in document under comment 11496 11530 Dorothy Stanley 28.3.10.8.5 426.48 something is weird with the formatting. Its seems like "Use the same value in both HE-SIG-B content channels." should be part of the 80 MHz description, but its looks like its in the paragraph with the 160 MHz section. Please clarify. as in comment Revised. Editor: remove the gap above that sentence and add a gap below it. Also change that sentence as follows: Use The same value is applied to in both content channels 11636 Dorothy Stanley 28.3.10.7.2 405.25 The title of Table 28-18 is field of an HE SU PPDU and HE ER SU PPDU", so why would B0 of HE-SIG-A1 ever be "set to 0 for HE TB PPDU"? You probably just want to say "set to 1 for HE SU PPDU and HE ER SU PPDU", and not say anything about HE TB PPDU. as in comment Revised. Editor please make changes shown in document under comment 11636
11-18-0118-02-00ax-cr-misc-phy.docx