IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs General and Annex G Comment Resolution Date: 2018-11-06 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email Huawei Aboul-Magd Technologies General Comments CID Page Line Comment Proposed Change Resolution use 15183 3.61 61 There are negative LOAs Address negative Rejected covering the 802.11ax standard, LOAs covering meaning companies that have 802.11ax by having The commenter claims to essential patents but them amended to point to a technical is unwilling to grant a license accept to license with the draft. widely under reasonable terms. broadly for free, or As long as these negative LOAs under reasonable The issues related to are present, then companies terms patents not really a implementing 802.11ax are at discussion and the risk. commenter is raise the issue at the IEEE-SA level. The doesn’t have the to frce changes to submitted LoA. 16081 All the D1.0 comments Resolve all D1.0 Rejected "resolved" as "REJECTED in the comments that were interest of releasing D2.0" or not resolved Draft D1.0 was similar (about 500 of them!) were on December 1st not in fact resolved Since then the draft gone through a revisions with many changes to almost all Clauses. Cmments that were submitted back then either not applicable or have been the satisfaction of the commenter. are alaways welcome
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs General and Annex G Comment Resolution Date: 2018-11-06 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email Aboul-Magd Huawei Technologies General Comments CID Page Line Comment Proposed Change Resolution 15183 3.61 61 There are negative LOAs covering the 802.11ax standard, meaning companies that have claims to essential patents but unwilling to grant a license widely under reasonable terms. As long as these negative LOAs are present, then companies implementing 802.11ax are at risk. Address negative LOAs covering 802.11ax by having them amended to accept to license broadly for free, or under reasonable terms Rejected The commenter point to a technical with the draft. The issues related to patents is not really a discussion and the commenter is raise the issue at the IEEE-SA level. The doesn’t have the to frce changes to submitted LoA. 16081 All the D1.0 comments "resolved" as "REJECTED in the interest of releasing D2.0" or similar (about 500 of them!) were not in fact resolved Resolve all D1.0 comments that were not resolved Rejected Draft D1.0 was on December 1st Since then the draft gone through a revisions with many changes to almost all Clauses. Cmments that were submitted back then either not applicable or have been the satisfaction of the commenter. are alaways welcome use
11-18-1852-00-00ax-general-and-annex-g-comment-resolution.docx