DEL vs. DEM: = 123.5 , < .001, 95% U p CI = [15, 20] DEM vs. CON: U = 80, < .001 , 95% p CI = [4, 6] OMCT 8 (3-14.75) 12 26 (24-28) (2) = 97.47, < .001 DEL vs. CON: = 95.5, < .001, 95% H p U p (max. score = 28) CI = [64.78, 91.04] DEL vs. DEM: = 1100.5, = .25, 95% U p CI = [-6.91, 19.57] DEM vs. CON: U = 21.5, .001, 95% p < CI = [58.59, 84.58] OSLA (max. 3 (2-5.75) 0 (0-0) 0 (0-0) (2) = 118.65, < .001 DEL vs. CON: = 64, < .001, 95 % CI H p U p score = 15) = [66.67, 84.70]
DEL vs. DEM: U = 123.5 , p < .001, 95% CI = [15, 20] DEM vs. CON: U = 80, p < .001 , 95% CI = [4, 6] OMCT (max. score = 28) 8 (3-14.75) 12 26 (24-28) H (2) = 97.47, p < .001 DEL vs. CON: U = 95.5, p < .001, 95% CI = [64.78, 91.04] DEL vs. DEM: U = 1100.5, p = .25, 95% CI = [-6.91, 19.57] DEM vs. CON: U = 21.5, p < .001, 95% CI = [58.59, 84.58] OSLA (max. score = 15) 3 (2-5.75) 0 (0-0) 0 (0-0) H (2) = 118.65, p < .001 DEL vs. CON: U = 64, p < .001, 95 % CI = [66.67, 84.70]
DelApp_paper_Revised_8_Jan_2015_FINAL_CLEAN_with_tables_and_figures.docx