8197 Osama 69.30 There are sub-fields in Clarify Reject the – the TWT IE having subfields are of variable length. When different length for repeating for each each field depends TWT parameter, how on the settings of the information can be other subfields, so decoded given the that the size, variabe length of some format, length, etc of the sub-fields? of each repeated set of subfields is fully described by the bits within that set of subfields. 8198 Osama 70.50 The terms Scheduling as in comment Duplicate of STA and Scheduled comment identified STA need to be in Duplicate of CID defined column 8200 Osama 72.47 Table 9-262k1 seems either provide a Revise generally – to be totally arbitrary rationale for the agree with and is not based on different restrictions comment, table any rationale. Perhaps or simply delete the modified some explanation is in table. My significantly to order. preference is to simplify - TGax delete the table. editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r1 that are marked with CID 8200. 8510 Robert 74.11 Invalid Change 10.44.3.4 Revise generally – Stacey to 27.7.3.4 agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r1 that are marked with CID 8510. 8591 Sheng 70.50 The terms Scheduling as in comment Reject definitions – Sun STA and Scheduled exist in 27.7.3.1 STA need to be defined 9126 73.14 Wrong section Change the wrong Revise generally – LEE reference 25.14 (Link reference to the agree with the adaptation using the correct one commenter, TGax HE variant HT Control editor to note that field) in the Table no change is Flow necessary at this Identifier field for a point in time as broadcast TWT D1.2 already has element the problem fixed per CID 4727. 9127 73.40 section reference Change the wrong Revise generally – LEE 25.14 (Link adaptation reference to the agree with the using the HE variant correct one commenter, TGax HT Control field) in the editor to note that Table 9-262k1-TWT no change is Flow Identifier field for necessary at this a broadcast TWT point in time as element D1.2 already has
8197 Osama 69.30 There are sub-fields in the TWT IE having variable length. When repeating for each TWT parameter, how the information can be decoded given the variabe length of some of the sub-fields? Clarify Reject – the subfields are of different length for each field depends on the settings of other subfields, so that the size, format, length, etc of each repeated set of subfields is fully described by the bits within that set of subfields. 8198 Osama 70.50 The terms Scheduling STA and Scheduled STA need to be defined as in comment Duplicate of comment identified in Duplicate of CID column 8200 Osama 72.47 Table 9-262k1 seems to be totally arbitrary and is not based on any rationale. Perhaps some explanation is in order. either provide a rationale for the different restrictions or simply delete the table. My preference is to delete the table. Revise – generally agree with comment, table modified significantly to simplify - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r1 that are marked with CID 8200. 8510 Robert Stacey 74.11 Invalid Change 10.44.3.4 to 27.7.3.4 Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r1 that are marked with CID 8510. 8591 Sheng Sun 70.50 The terms Scheduling STA and Scheduled STA need to be defined as in comment Reject – definitions exist in 27.7.3.1 9126 LEE 73.14 Wrong section reference 25.14 (Link adaptation using the HE variant HT Control field) in the Table Flow Identifier field for a broadcast TWT element Change the wrong reference to the correct one Revise – generally agree with the commenter, TGax editor to note that no change is necessary at this point in time as D1.2 already has the problem fixed per CID 4727. 9127 LEE 73.40 section reference 25.14 (Link adaptation using the HE variant HT Control field) in the Table 9-262k1-TWT Flow Identifier field for a broadcast TWT element Change the wrong reference to the correct one Revise – generally agree with the commenter, TGax editor to note that no change is necessary at this point in time as D1.2 already has
11-17-0777-01-00ax-cr-twt-ie.docx