4.3.14a and there is no reason to repeat this list in more than one place in the draft. 8333 149.10 27.1 The MAC Insert Rejected. MAC clause should "Regulatory have a requirements 802.11-2016 regulatory that do not includes the requirements affect statement paragraph just interoperability with “Compliance after the are not the provisions introduction, addressed in of any IEEE as channel this standard. Standards access might Implementers document does not have are referred imply compliance regulatory to the to any applicable constraints, regulatory regulatory e.g., EN 301 sources in requirements. 893 in Europe. D for further Implementers of information. the standard are Operation in responsible for countries observing or within defined referring to the regulatory applicable domains may regulatory be subject to requirements” additional or under Laws and alternative regulations. national regulations." This statement seems to achieve the same understanding as proposed by the commenter. Additionally other MAC clauses (Clause 10 in particular) doesn’t include a specific regulatory statement in the form proposed by the commenter.
4.3.14a and there is no reason to repeat this list in more than one place in the draft. 8333 149.10 27.1 The MAC clause should have a regulatory requirements paragraph just after the introduction, as channel access might have regulatory constraints, e.g., EN 301 893 in Europe. Insert "Regulatory requirements that do not affect interoperability are not addressed in this standard. Implementers are referred to the regulatory sources in D for further information. Operation in countries within defined regulatory domains may be subject to additional or alternative national regulations." Rejected. 802.11-2016 includes the statement “Compliance with the provisions of any IEEE Standards document does not imply compliance to any applicable regulatory requirements. Implementers of the standard are responsible for observing or referring to the applicable regulatory requirements” under Laws and regulations. This statement seems to achieve the same understanding as proposed by the commenter. Additionally other MAC clauses (Clause 10 in particular) doesn’t include a specific regulatory statement in the form proposed by the commenter. MAC
11-17-1248-02-00ax-clause-27-1-comment-resolution.docx