10239 Hunter, 3.2 A "beamforee' is defined as a Replace "beamformee, as Rjected: Beamformee is David 5.07 "beamformee". Very useful. Also, the described ... defined on page 7 in the "as x, as y" form is confusing at best beamforming).F44" with baseline . and a definition is not an index , so "receiver." reference pointers should not be Clause 3.2 is specific to included. 802.11 and can contain references. These references help disambiguate between HT beamformee and VHT beamformee Discussion: It seems CID 10239 refers to the following definition in page 6 line 7 (not page 5) in D5.0: high throughput (HT) beamformee: An HT station (STA) that receives an HT physical layer protocol data unit (PPDU) that was transmitted using a beamforming steering matrix and that supports an HT transmit beamforming mechanism as beamformee, as described in 9.29.2 (HT tTransmit beamforming with implicit feedback) or 9.29.3 (Explicit feedback beamforming). Hunter, 3.2 If this "can" does not mean "may", then Replace this normative Revised. Agree with the David 6.51 this statement is completely use of "can be" with "is", commenter to remove the Physically and logically there can, of so this statement is only a second sentence. course, be multiple things identified as report that there is only "primary AC" at the same time. So this one primary AC at a statement is trying to sneak in a time. (Though this requirement -- that only one primary statement really isn't AC is _permitted_ at a time. relevant to the definition of primary AC, so it would be better to delete it.)
10239 Hunter, David 3.2 5.07 A "beamforee' is defined as a "beamformee". Very useful. Also, the "as x, as y" form is confusing at best and a definition is not an index , so reference pointers should not be included. Replace "beamformee, as described ... beamforming).F44" with "receiver." Rjected: Beamformee is defined on page 7 in the baseline . Clause 3.2 is specific to 802.11 and can contain references. These references help disambiguate between HT beamformee and VHT beamformee Discussion: It seems CID 10239 refers to the following definition in page 6 line 7 (not page 5) in D5.0: high throughput (HT) beamformee: An HT station (STA) that receives an HT physical layer protocol data unit (PPDU) that was transmitted using a beamforming steering matrix and that supports an HT transmit beamforming mechanism as beamformee, as described in 9.29.2 (HT tTransmit beamforming with implicit feedback) or 9.29.3 (Explicit feedback beamforming). Hunter, David 3.2 6.51 If this "can" does not mean "may", then this statement is completely Physically and logically there can, of course, be multiple things identified as "primary AC" at the same time. So this statement is trying to sneak in a requirement -- that only one primary AC is _permitted_ at a time. Replace this normative use of "can be" with "is", so this statement is only a report that there is only one primary AC at a time. (Though this statement really isn't relevant to the definition of primary AC, so it would be better to delete it.) Revised. Agree with the commenter to remove the second sentence.
11-13-0731-01-00ac-sb0-general-clause-3-cids.docx