The cyclic prefix used for HE-SIG-B be 0.8 The number of symbols in HE-SIG-B, μs. denoted by shall be signaled in HE-SIG-A in the default mode (see NSYM,HE-SIG-B, Section 25.3.9.2.4). For the content channel (c = 1 or 2), denote the sample on the cth kth subcarrier of the symbol by . The time domain waveform for the HE-SIG-B nth dk,n,c follows Equation (2625). Instruction to ax editor: please replace equation (26-25) in with the following (2625) Clause 26.3.9.8.3 one: Instruction to ax editor: please make the following changes on P114/L8 in Clause 26.3.9.8.3: where CID Page Comment Proposed Change Resolution Redefining 293 Bin Tian 101.38 Gamma_k,BW is Revised. Gamma_k,BW Change to defined in Table 26-14 not necessary as in the and following unless we have resolution of Equations different values CID293 in with mostly TBDs. from legacy. doc But in the application Suggest to of this varible, it points remove the definition of to section 22 (11ac Gamma_k,BW for spec) as its reference. 11ax and replace The same problem it by simple appears in the statement of using descriptions os many legacy definition pre-HE modulated and value for this varible fields, like L-STF, L-LTF, ... Siguard 101.38 Defintion of Page 100 states Revised. 1987 Gamma_k,BW that the values are Change to contradicts statement determined by as in the on page 100. 26-10 and resolution of CID1987 in doc 1993 Siguard 102.22 Defintion of Page 100 states Revised. Gamma_k,BW that the values are Change to contradicts statement determined by as in the on page 100. 26-10 and resolution of CID1993 in doc Resolution to CID #293/#1987/#1993 as follows.
The cyclic prefix used for HE-SIG-B be 0.8 μs. The number of symbols in HE-SIG-B, denoted by NSYM,HE-SIG-B, shall be signaled in HE-SIG-A in the default mode (see Section 25.3.9.2.4). For the cth content channel (c = 1 or 2), denote the sample on the kth subcarrier of the nth symbol by dk,n,c . The time domain waveform for the HE-SIG-B follows Equation (2625). Instruction to ax editor: please replace equation (26-25) in Clause 26.3.9.8.3 with the following one: (2625) Instruction to ax editor: please make the following changes on P114/L8 in Clause 26.3.9.8.3: where CID Page Comment Proposed Change Resolution 293 Bin Tian 101.38 Gamma_k,BW is defined in Table 26-14 and following Equations with mostly TBDs. But in the application of this varible, it points to section 22 (11ac spec) as its reference. The same problem appears in the descriptions os many pre-HE modulated fields, like L-STF, L-LTF, ... Redefining Gamma_k,BW not necessary unless we have different values from legacy. Suggest to remove the definition of Gamma_k,BW for 11ax and replace it by simple statement of using legacy definition and value for this varible Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID293 in doc 1987 Siguard 101.38 Defintion of Gamma_k,BW contradicts statement on page 100. Page 100 states that the values are determined by 26-10 and Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID1987 in doc 1993 Siguard 102.22 Defintion of Gamma_k,BW contradicts statement on page 100. Page 100 states that the values are determined by 26-10 and Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID1993 in doc Resolution to CID #293/#1987/#1993 as follows.
11-16-0937-07-00ax-11ax-comment-resolutions-for-clauses-26-3-2-26-3-9-3-26-3-9-4-26-3-9-5-26-3-10-2-26-3-10-13.docx