Appendix 1: Example template: Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: Ship simulator - Learning on the bridge complete the gaps! – Assessed Learning Outcome Method 0-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-100 State procedures and protocol in Excludes vital Clearly states 1 sea- going situation procedure or protocols and protocol in procedures relevant simulation to the given exercise scenario and gives relevant commands 2 Examine of contributing factors Mentions one or Examines full 75% that will affect actions taken in bridge two contributing range of factors, scenario factors without how they interplay giving information and what impacts about their possible they may have on impacts resulting action simulation 3 Demonstrate rational decision Unable to express Expresses Rationale for making in high pressure environment instructions instructions clearly decisions is Ship clearly or to identified explicit. Expected coherently for members of the actions and crew. Shows crew impacts signs of indecision communicated or panic. clearly to specific members of crew. 4 Reflect on personal performance in Written report Well-structured sea-going environment with does not critically report which reference to relevant literature examine behaviour critically reflects on in simulator personal environment, or performance with refer to relevant reference to literature relevant literature on 25% behaviours 5 Report the rationale behind decisions Reasons for Very well structured in the given scenario and explain any decisions at report. Detailed report possible amendments basic level. Impacts discussion of or alternatives are rationale behind Written not considered in decisions and other enough depth options that could be considered in hindsight. Outlines key lessons learned.
Appendix 1: Example template: Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: Ship simulator - Learning on the bridge – complete the gaps! Assessed Learning Outcome Method 0-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-100 1 State procedures and protocol in sea- going situation Ship simulation 75% Excludes vital procedure or protocol in simulation exercise Clearly states protocols and procedures relevant to the given scenario and gives relevant commands 2 Examine of contributing factors that will affect actions taken in bridge scenario Mentions one or two contributing factors without giving information about their possible impacts Examines full range of factors, how they interplay and what impacts they may have on resulting action 3 Demonstrate rational decision making in high pressure environment Unable to express instructions clearly or coherently for crew. Shows signs of indecision or panic. Expresses instructions clearly to identified members of the crew Rationale for decisions is explicit. Expected actions and impacts communicated clearly to specific members of crew. 4 Reflect on personal performance in sea-going environment with reference to relevant literature Written report 25% Written report does not critically examine behaviour in simulator environment, or refer to relevant literature Well-structured report which critically reflects on personal performance with reference to relevant literature on behaviours 5 Report the rationale behind decisions in the given scenario and explain any possible amendments Reasons for decisions at basic level. Impacts or alternatives are not considered in enough depth Very well structured report. Detailed discussion of rationale behind decisions and other options that could be considered in hindsight. Outlines key lessons learned.
Designing_Programmes_and_Modules_updated_March_2017.docx