Table 1 RBUFCAP encoding for the EDMG Compressed BlockAck TGay Editor: modify in — variant (Draft 1.1) P53 as follows: Indicates that the recipient’s memory has enough space to receive A-MPDUs with a length Maximum MPDU Length Exponent (Table 5) CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1081 112.23 10.13.7 802.11ah introduced Use S-MPDU for the whole MPDU" as a general term. case. So, is no need to add a new terminology for EDMG case. 2400 35.00 9.3.1.9.8 S-MPDU is introduced in Change "single to 11ah, is defined in Do it through the REVmd_D 0.5. 11ax also whole draft. replaces single to Proposal: Accept CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1083 196.12 10.62.1 It looks like the MPDU As in comment. sequence number is the same with the original sequence number. The relation between the original sequence number should be explained somewhere in section 9. Proposal: Reject Discussion: Sequence Control field that covers the relevant sequence number is defined in 9.2.4.4.1 (Sequence Control field) CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1112 31.07 9.2.4.4.1 The Start of MSDUn subfield Either change the logic to is set to one to indicate that "The Start of MSDUn subfield the contains the first is set to zero to indicate..." or segment of an MSDU. It is remove the n from the set to zero otherwise. subfield name Proposal: Reject Discussion: The comment and the proposal are unclear, and the suggested change does not have any technical impact.
TGay Editor: modify in Table 1 — RBUFCAP encoding for the EDMG Compressed BlockAck variant P53 (Draft 1.1) as follows: Indicates that the recipient’s memory has enough space to receive A-MPDUs with a length Maximum Length Exponent (Table 5) CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1081 112.23 10.13.7 802.11ah introduced as a general term. So, is no need to add a new terminology for EDMG case. Use S-MPDU for the whole case. 2400 35.00 9.3.1.9.8 S-MPDU is introduced in 11ah, is defined in REVmd_D 0.5. 11ax also replaces single to Change "single MPDU" to Do it through the whole draft. Proposal: Accept CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1083 196.12 10.62.1 It looks like the MPDU sequence number is the same with the original sequence number. The relation between the original sequence number should be explained somewhere in section 9. As in comment. Proposal: Reject Discussion: Sequence Control field that covers the relevant sequence number is defined in 9.2.4.4.1 (Sequence Control field) CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1112 31.07 9.2.4.4.1 The Start of MSDUn subfield is set to one to indicate that the contains the first segment of an MSDU. It is set to zero otherwise. Either change the logic to "The Start of MSDUn subfield is set to zero to indicate..." or remove the n from the subfield name Proposal: Reject Discussion: The comment and the proposal are unclear, and the suggested change does not have any technical impact. MPDU
11-18-0667-00-00ay-lb231-comment-resolution-of-cid-in-range-of-1069-2402.docx