6824 9.28.3 138 31 T The statement "In an MFB Remove this sentence. response solicited by an MRQ that was carried in a VHT NDP Announcement frame, the MFB shall be computed based on the VHT NDP following the VHT NDP Announcement frame." was redundant with P137L10 " in the case of a VHT NDP Announcement carrying the MRQ, based on the subsequent VHT NDP......" Resolution: Reject Discussion: The sentence does repeat what has been said in the previous page. However the sentence does add context to adjacent paragraphs. So we recommend keeping it as it is. 6826 9.28.3 138 54 T P138L43 states that "If the Please clarify whether to MFB is in the same MPDU use MPDU or PPDU to as a VHT Compressed make both statements Beamforming while consistent. P138L54 states that "For unsolicited MFB that is not in the same PPDU as a VHT Compressed Beamforming frame". Please clarify whether to use MPDU or PPDU to make the statements consistent. Resolution: Reject Discussion: These sentences are consistent so there is no reason to change them. 6681 9.28.3 139 27 T "NOTE 1--If a STA fails to chang to: "NOTE 1--If a respond immediately to an STA does not respond MRQ". Tehre is no such a immediately to an MRQ ... requirement as immediate " response to an MRQ, so there canno be a failure Resolution: Reject Discussion: does have a strict meaning with respect to solicited MFB i.e. when solicited “Immediate” MFB is sent in the same TXOP as the corresponding MRQ.
6824 9.28.3 138 31 T The statement "In an MFB response solicited by an MRQ that was carried in a VHT NDP Announcement frame, the MFB shall be computed based on the VHT NDP following the VHT NDP Announcement frame." was redundant with P137L10 " in the case of a VHT NDP Announcement carrying the MRQ, based on the subsequent VHT NDP......" Remove this sentence. Resolution: Reject Discussion: The sentence does repeat what has been said in the previous page. However the sentence does add context to adjacent paragraphs. So we recommend keeping it as it is. 6826 9.28.3 138 54 T P138L43 states that "If the MFB is in the same MPDU as a VHT Compressed Beamforming while P138L54 states that "For unsolicited MFB that is not in the same PPDU as a VHT Compressed Beamforming frame". Please clarify whether to use MPDU or PPDU to make the statements consistent. Please clarify whether to use MPDU or PPDU to make both statements consistent. Resolution: Reject Discussion: These sentences are consistent so there is no reason to change them. 6681 9.28.3 139 27 T "NOTE 1--If a STA fails to respond immediately to an MRQ". Tehre is no such a requirement as immediate response to an MRQ, so there canno be a failure chang to: "NOTE 1--If a STA does not respond immediately to an MRQ ... " Resolution: Reject Discussion: “Immediate” does have a strict meaning with respect to solicited MFB i.e. when solicited MFB is sent in the same TXOP as the corresponding MRQ.
11-12-1073-01-00ac-lb188-cids.docx