needed and can be removed. Apply the changes as proposed in doc 1852r4. Yee In Equation (27-3), replace As provided in comment. Revised agree – "OBSSPDmin" with "OBSS_PDmin" with the comment. and "OBSSPDmax" with Make the changes "OBSS_PDmax" since these are the as proposed in doc right terms used in other parts of 1852r4. the spec(e.g. figure 27-9). Osama This clause provides the for as in comment Rejected a STA is – Aboulmagd adjusting OBSS_PD value. However allowed to apply it doesn't state when this change is OBSS_PD SR under requested, i.e. what event does specific conditions. trigger this adjustment? If it meets these conditions it can apply this mechanism. In such case, it needs to select OBSS_PD and TxPower values. The selection process is implementation dependent but must adhere to the rules defined in this subclause. Yusuke "OBSSPD" and "OBSS PD" should As commented. Revised agree – Tanaka be unified to "OBSS_PD" with the comment. Make the changes as proposed in doc 1852r4. Graham "...and respect the condition Replace cited text with "in Revised – Smith defined in Equation". I can't find accordance with Equation" with the comment. any other use of this expression in Make the changes 11md or this document. Replace as proposed in doc 1852r4. Graham Equation 27-3 indicates that the Replace with = Rejected one Γëñ – Smith TX power may be less than the must ask and simple rule and could, in fact, be answer the set to zero. Seems pretty dumb to following question: me to have the < sign there as it is what are the bad enough already and can one consequences of a really see devices using less than STA a TXP the permitted power if they were value less than dumb enough to do this anyway? what is permitted? Is it a net positive or negative for the individual STA, and is it a net positive or negative for the system? Unless
needed and can be removed. Apply the changes as proposed in doc 1852r4. Yee In Equation (27-3), replace "OBSSPDmin" with "OBSS_PDmin" and "OBSSPDmax" with "OBSS_PDmax" since these are the right terms used in other parts of the spec(e.g. figure 27-9). As provided in comment. Revised – agree with the comment. Make the changes as proposed in doc 1852r4. Osama Aboulmagd This clause provides the for adjusting OBSS_PD value. However it doesn't state when this change is requested, i.e. what event does trigger this adjustment? as in comment Rejected – a STA is allowed to apply OBSS_PD SR under specific conditions. If it meets these conditions it can apply this mechanism. In such case, it needs to select OBSS_PD and TxPower values. The selection process is implementation dependent but must adhere to the rules defined in this subclause. Yusuke Tanaka "OBSSPD" and "OBSS PD" should be unified to "OBSS_PD" As commented. Revised – agree with the comment. Make the changes as proposed in doc 1852r4. Graham Smith "...and respect the condition defined in Equation". I can't find any other use of this expression in 11md or this document. Replace Replace cited text with "in accordance with Equation" Revised – with the comment. Make the changes as proposed in doc 1852r4. Graham Smith Equation 27-3 indicates that the TX power may be less than the simple rule and could, in fact, be set to zero. Seems pretty dumb to me to have the < sign there as it is bad enough already and can one really see devices using less than the permitted power if they were dumb enough to do this anyway? Replace Γëñ with = Rejected – one must ask and answer the following question: what are the consequences of a STA a TXP value less than what is permitted? Is it a net positive or negative for the individual STA, and is it a net positive or negative for the system? Unless
11-17-1852-04-00ax-cr-for-27-9.docx