Identify an author's Evaluate an author's Evaluate an author's argument, Evaluate an author's argument, Evaluate an author's argument D argument in a text and argument, assessing assessing whether the reasoning is assessing whether the reasoning and reasoning for effectiveness, distinguish claims that are whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant is valid and the evidence is validity, logic, credibility, and supported by reasons and sound and the evidence is and sufficient; recognize when relevant and sufficient; identify relevance of the evidence. evidence from claims that relevant and sufficient to irrelevant evidence is introduced. false statements and fallacious are not. support the claims. reasoning. R3B correlation K-5 3 Synthesize Ideas from Multiple Texts (Approaching Texts as a Researcher) Grade 6 Grade 7 8 9-10 Grade 11-12 Compare and contrast the Compare and contrast Compare and contrast Analyze how similar ideas or Analyze the representation of a A experience of reading a text information presented in information presented in topics are portrayed in subject in two different artistic to listening to or viewing an different mediums and different mediums and analyze different media formats. mediums, including what is audio or video version of the analyze how the techniques how the techniques unique to emphasized or absent in each same text, noting how a unique to each medium each medium contribute to treatment. performance impacts contribute to meaning. meaning. personal interpretation. R4A correlation Texts/Forms K-5 3 Synthesize Ideas from Multiple Texts (Approaching Texts as a Researcher) 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 9-10 11-12 Compare and contrast how Analyze two or more texts B two or more authors writing that provide conflicting
D Identify an author's argument in a text and distinguish claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not. Evaluate an author's argument, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims. Evaluate an author's argument, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced. Evaluate an author's argument, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning. Evaluate an author's argument and reasoning for effectiveness, validity, logic, credibility, and relevance of the evidence. K-5 correlation R3B 3 Synthesize Ideas from Multiple Texts (Approaching Texts as a Researcher) Grade 6 Grade 7 8 9-10 Grade 11-12 A Compare and contrast the experience of reading a text to listening to or viewing an audio or video version of the same text, noting how a performance impacts personal interpretation. Compare and contrast information presented in different mediums and analyze how the techniques unique to each medium contribute to meaning. Compare and contrast information presented in different mediums and analyze how the techniques unique to each medium contribute to meaning. Analyze how similar ideas or topics are portrayed in different media formats. Analyze the representation of a subject in two different artistic mediums, including what is emphasized or absent in each treatment. Texts/Forms K-5 correlation R4A 3 Synthesize Ideas from Multiple Texts (Approaching Texts as a Researcher) 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 9-10 11-12 B Compare and contrast how two or more authors writing Analyze two or more texts that provide conflicting
curr-mls-standards-ela-6-12-sboe-2016.docx