I would lean towards b). Proposed resolution: REJECT If no frame is available, then the normative behavior is the nothing” case at 1487.24. “Do CID Commenter Clause Line Comment Proposed 364 Woojin Ahn 10.22.2.2 1486.8 When an AP updates EDCA - Otherwise, parameter set, associated - If CW[AC] is less than STAs only update MIB CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set attributes and their current to the value max(CWmin[AC], CW[AC] will remain the (CW[AC] + 2 - 1). ├ù same. Therefore, when a - If CW[AC] is equal to or greater STA enters the "otherwise" than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall condition, it might have be set to CWmax[AC]. CW[AC] less than CWmin[AC] or greater than CWmax[AC] if its EDCA parameter set had been updated by the associated AP. It is necessary to keep STAs' CW values within the intended range [CWmin, CWmax]. Discussion: Text in question is 1486.8 Otherwise, — If CW[AC] is less than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to the value (CW[AC] + 1) × 2 1. — – If CW[AC] is equal to CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be left unchanged. — Proposal is to change the second bullet to account for CW[AC] > CWmax[AC] Proposed resolution: REVISED 1486.8 to read Otherwise, — If CW[AC] is less than CW[AC] shall be set to the value (CW[AC] + 1) × 2 1. — – Else CW[AC] shall be set to CWmax[AC]. —
I would lean towards b). Proposed resolution: REJECT If no frame is available, then the normative behavior is the “Do nothing” case at 1487.24. CID Commenter Clause Line Comment Proposed 364 Woojin Ahn 10.22.2.2 1486.8 When an AP updates EDCA parameter set, associated STAs only update MIB attributes and their current CW[AC] will remain the same. Therefore, when a STA enters the "otherwise" condition, it might have CW[AC] less than CWmin[AC] or greater than CWmax[AC] if its EDCA parameter set had been updated by the associated AP. It is necessary to keep STAs' CW values within the intended range [CWmin, CWmax]. - Otherwise, - If CW[AC] is less than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to the value max(CWmin[AC], (CW[AC] + ├ù 2 - 1). - If CW[AC] is equal to or greater than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to CWmax[AC]. Discussion: Text in question is 1486.8 — Otherwise, — If CW[AC] is less than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to the value (CW[AC] + 1) × 2 – 1. — If CW[AC] is equal to CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be left unchanged. Proposal is to change the second bullet to account for CW[AC] > CWmax[AC] Proposed resolution: REVISED 1486.8 to read — Otherwise, — If CW[AC] is less than CW[AC] shall be set to the value (CW[AC] + 1) × 2 – 1. — Else CW[AC] shall be set to CWmax[AC].
11-17-0987-05-000m-resolutions-for-dcf-and-edca-comments-d0-1.docx