Figure G- 1 Exceedance curves for salinity at Lock 6 at 2010 levels of salt accession for the S4 and S1 options for the BP BDL and BP 2800 GL scenario, 1975 to 2000 period Figure G- 2 Exceedance curves for salinity at Lock 6 at 2010 levels of salt accession for the S4 and S1 options for the BP BDL and BP 2800 GL scenario, 1975 to 2009 period Appendix H of model results for Burtundy Figure H1 Exceedance curves for salinity at Burtundy at 2010 levels of salt accession for the S4 and S1 options for the BP BDL and BP 2800 GL scenario, 1975 to 2000 period Figure H2 Exceedance curves for salinity at Burtundy at 2010 levels of salt accession for the S4 and S1 options for the BP BDL and BP 2800 GL scenario, 1975 to 2009 period Appendix I Plots of model results for Milang Table I1 Impact of Salt Interception Schemes on average simulated salinity at Milang and the 95 percentile over the BSMS benchmark period (1975-2000) BP BDL BP 2800 95 95 Average Average percentile percentile Option Scenario Salinity at Salinity at Salinity at Salinity at Milang (EC) Milang (EC) Milang (EC) Milang (EC) 2010 619 954 518 770 2015 634 999 525 782 S4 - 100% benefit 2050 679 1072# 571 858 2100 716 1143 599 913 2010 656 1025 529 791 2015 670 1053 537 804 S3 84% benefit – 2050 716 1136 585 884 2100 755 1208 613 941 2010 700 1120 564 858 2015 715 1150 573 874 S2 - 50% benefit 2050 766 1238 623 963 2100 809 1319 653 1021 2010 761 1241 610 949 2015 781 1277 621 971 S1 - No SISs 2050 834 1368 674 1063 2100 879 1452 707 1128 # Highlighted in red are the values greater than the target Table I2 Impact of Salt Interception Schemes on average simulated salinity at Milang and the 95 percentile over 1975-2009 period BP BDL BP 2800
Figure G- 1 Exceedance curves for salinity at Lock 6 at 2010 levels of salt accession for the S4 and S1 options for the BP BDL and BP 2800 GL scenario, 1975 to 2000 period Figure G- 2 Exceedance curves for salinity at Lock 6 at 2010 levels of salt accession for the S4 and S1 options for the BP BDL and BP 2800 GL scenario, 1975 to 2009 period Appendix H of model results for Burtundy Figure H1 Exceedance curves for salinity at Burtundy at 2010 levels of salt accession for the S4 and S1 options for the BP BDL and BP 2800 GL scenario, 1975 to 2000 period Figure H2 Exceedance curves for salinity at Burtundy at 2010 levels of salt accession for the S4 and S1 options for the BP BDL and BP 2800 GL scenario, 1975 to 2009 period Appendix I Plots of model results for Milang Table I1 Impact of Salt Interception Schemes on average simulated salinity at Milang and the 95 percentile over the BSMS benchmark period (1975-2000) BP BDL BP 2800 Option Scenario Average Salinity at Milang (EC) 95 percentile Salinity at Milang (EC) Average Salinity at Milang (EC) 95 percentile Salinity at Milang (EC) S4 - 100% benefit 2010 619 954 518 770 2015 634 999 525 782 2050 679 1072# 571 858 2100 716 1143 599 913 S3 – 84% benefit 2010 656 1025 529 791 2015 670 1053 537 804 2050 716 1136 585 884 2100 755 1208 613 941 S2 - 50% benefit 2010 700 1120 564 858 2015 715 1150 573 874 2050 766 1238 623 963 2100 809 1319 653 1021 S1 - No SISs 2010 761 1241 610 949 2015 781 1277 621 971 2050 834 1368 674 1063 2100 879 1452 707 1128 # Highlighted in red are the values greater than the target Table I2 Impact of Salt Interception Schemes on average simulated salinity at Milang and the 95 percentile over 1975-2009 period BP BDL BP 2800
D17-41702%20-GRoSM-modelling.DOCX