Change from to “5-n” “5” to “n+1” “6” to “n+2” “7” to “n+3” “8” to “n+4” “9” to “n+5” “10” For 8-202—ADDTS Response frame Action field format, At 813.51 Change from to “7-n” “7” to “n+1” “8” to “n+2” “9” to “n+3” “10” to “n+4” “11” And for 8-205—QoS Map configure frame body 815.17, Change from to “3-n” “3” CID 1043 1043 845.03 8.5.8.18 Figure 8-475 QMF Policy replace "3-257" with "0 or element length should 3-257" include 0 as a valid length in the case when it is absent. Discussion: The comment is on the length value shown for the QMF Policy element, currently 3-257. The commenter proposes to change from to or 3-257” as the field is optional. Agree with the commenter. “3-257” “0 Proposed resolution: Accepted CID 1059 1059 1022.45 9.21.10.3 References to 9.13 and Correct them 9.3.2.5 at the location are probably wrong. Discussion: The comment is on the following text, the references to 9.13 and 9.3.2.5:
Change from “5-n” to “5” “n+1” to “6” “n+2” to “7” “n+3” to “8” “n+4” to “9” “n+5” to “10” For 8-202—ADDTS Response frame Action field format, At 813.51 Change from “7-n” to “7” “n+1” to “8” “n+2” to “9” “n+3” to “10” “n+4” to “11” And for 8-205—QoS Map configure frame body 815.17, Change from “3-n” to “3” CID 1043 1043 845.03 8.5.8.18 Figure 8-475 QMF Policy element length should include 0 as a valid length in the case when it is absent. replace "3-257" with "0 or 3-257" Discussion: The comment is on the length value shown for the QMF Policy element, currently 3-257. The commenter proposes to change from “3-257” to “0 or 3-257” as the field is optional. Agree with the commenter. Proposed resolution: Accepted CID 1059 1059 1022.45 9.21.10.3 References to 9.13 and 9.3.2.5 at the location are probably wrong. Correct them Discussion: The comment is on the following text, the references to 9.13 and 9.3.2.5:
11-13-0466-01-000m-additional-mac-comment-resolutions-iv.docx