Description of services: Architect & Subconsultant Services Assessment criteria and elements Score Comment (out of 100) 65 Understanding of the engagement Identification of key issues 70 Has addressed three of the key issues Management of key issues 60 Shows a limited understanding of how key issues would be managed 60 Personnel Experience and qualifications of key 60 Lists personnel for architectural, civil personnel to perform services engineering, and security with limited demonstrated experience Division of responsibility and authority of 60 Varied division of responsibility with the key personnel suitable authority Has a good record for a similar facility Recent experience in similar engagements 65 at Bullamukanka but a poor record for the more recent Bandiwollup Method statement 60 Programming and resources for the services 60 The program supplied is basic, showing completion within the required time, showing many key activities but no allocation of personnel Means to achieve sustainable development 40 to show an understanding of objectives sustainable development objectives Demonstrated ability to research and 50 Does not show a good understanding of incorporate innovative solutions principles of research. No examples of innovative solutions offered Knowledge of and experience with the 60 Not fully convincing on the extent of standards and guidelines knowledge of standards and guidelines Procedures for inspection of work in 70 Has a reasonable approach to progress for compliance with design intent inspection against design quality and and quality intent The CADD system to be used. 70 Appears to have a CADD system compatible with that specified, but examples of recent use are very basic Methodology for managing subconsultants 75 Good coverage of procedures but a varied record of managing subconsultants J Voller, Keith Dyke, Bon Aluska, G. Bedford Team signatures: Date: 9th August 2006 Attachment 2 (3 of 3): Non-price criteria scores Tenderer’s name: Delta and Partners Project name: Ettamalonga Health Services New Mental Health Facility RFT/Contract number 0601462 Description of services: Architect & Subconsultant Services Assessment criteria and elements Score Comment
Description of services: Architect & Subconsultant Services Assessment criteria and elements Score (out of 100) Comment Understanding of the engagement 65 Identification of key issues 70 Has addressed three of the key issues Management of key issues 60 Shows a limited understanding of how key issues would be managed Personnel 60 Experience and qualifications of key personnel to perform services 60 Lists personnel for architectural, civil engineering, and security with limited demonstrated experience Division of responsibility and authority of the key personnel 60 Varied division of responsibility with suitable authority Recent experience in similar engagements 65 Has a good record for a similar facility at Bullamukanka but a poor record for the more recent Bandiwollup Method statement 60 Programming and resources for the services 60 The program supplied is basic, showing completion within the required time, showing many key activities but no allocation of personnel Means to achieve sustainable development objectives 40 to show an understanding of sustainable development objectives Demonstrated ability to research and incorporate innovative solutions 50 Does not show a good understanding of principles of research. No examples of innovative solutions offered Knowledge of and experience with the standards and guidelines 60 Not fully convincing on the extent of knowledge of standards and guidelines Procedures for inspection of work in progress for compliance with design intent and quality 70 Has a reasonable approach to inspection against design quality and intent The CADD system to be used. 70 Appears to have a CADD system compatible with that specified, but examples of recent use are very basic Methodology for managing subconsultants 75 Good coverage of procedures but a varied record of managing subconsultants Team signatures: J Voller, Keith Dyke, Bon Aluska, G. Bedford Date: 9th August 2006 Attachment 2 (3 of 3): Non-price criteria scores Tenderer’s name: Delta and Partners Project name: Ettamalonga Health Services New Mental Health Facility RFT/Contract number 0601462 Description of services: Architect & Subconsultant Services Assessment criteria and elements Score Comment
cs_we_recommendation_multiple_tenders_1.docx