The actions are assigned a ranking. Tier 1 projects are considered of high “tier” priority to the region and the most feasible to implement. Tier 2 projects are considered short-medium term with potential funding sources to implement them. Tier 3 projects are those that will require long-term implementation efforts, and where funding is not secured. 51 identifies the strategies and the CTP Priority that the strategy helps implement. Table 52 through Table 57 identify actions to implement each strategy, suggested lead agency or agencies to assume responsibility for implementation, the timeframe for completion, and the suggested tier. It should be noted that while some actions will require an initial investment to implement them, over the long term they may result in cost-savings to public transit programs. Table 51. Strategies and CTP Priorities Addressed CTP Priority Addressed of and and serve to Stop Funding Service Service experience Service funding Service Strategies Capacity Innovative Distribution and and communities of rider cost-effectiveness Funds Models Replacements and accessibility Improve Expand Maintain New/Innovative Accessibility Maintenance – Partnerships – – – and Quality –Increased 1d Increase 6 –New Equitable 1b 5 – Enhance 1a Capital Balance New 7 – Technology Partnerships underserved – – – - 1c 4 9 8 2 3 Develop a committee to x x x x oversee implementation of the plan X Measure performance Enhance access and increase X X x system efficiency Encourage use of fixed X route transit Manage ADA service x demand Enhance pedestrian X access/land use improvements
The actions are assigned a “tier” ranking. Tier 1 projects are considered of high priority to the region and the most feasible to implement. Tier 2 projects are considered short-medium term with potential funding sources to implement them. Tier 3 projects are those that will require long-term implementation efforts, and where funding is not secured. 51 identifies the strategies and the CTP Priority that the strategy helps implement. Table 52 through Table 57 identify actions to implement each strategy, suggested lead agency or agencies to assume responsibility for implementation, the timeframe for completion, and the suggested tier. It should be noted that while some actions will require an initial investment to implement them, over the long term they may result in cost-savings to public transit programs. Table 51. Strategies and CTP Priorities Addressed CTP Priority Addressed Strategies 1a – Maintain Service 1b – Expand Service 1c – Increase Capacity and Quality of Service 1d – Improve Stop Accessibility 2 – Capital Replacements and Maintenance 3 – Balance cost-effectiveness and accessibility 4 – Equitable Distribution of Funds 5 –Increased funding 6 – New/Innovative Partnerships and Funding 7 –New and Innovative Technology and Service Models 8 - New Partnerships to serve underserved communities 9 – Enhance rider experience Develop a committee to oversee implementation of the plan x x x x Measure performance X Enhance access and increase system efficiency X X x Encourage use of fixed route transit X Manage ADA service demand x Enhance pedestrian access/land use improvements X
ctp.docx