sources material), or it material, or may writer with those information of synthesizes the appropriate to may not offer not of others. the writer with ideas of the the writing any ideas other synthesize the that of others. writer with those situation; and to than the writer’s ideas of the of others. integrate his/her own ideas. writer with those information with of others. that of others Processes The writer The writer The writer The writer The writer exhibits serious displays exhibits shows clear displays highly While writing to weaknesses in unsatisfactory satisfactory understanding of effective inform, the understanding understanding of understanding of writing as a understanding of information and the processes of writing as a writing as a process; the writing as a the writer’s writing, usually process reflected process; the writer created process; the performance of several kinds. in one or more writer created at multiple drafts, writer created create the The writer did of the following least two drafts, employed multiple drafts, information that not create more ways: did not employed a few flexible employed he/she than one draft, create more than different strategies for flexible understands the did not use one draft, did strategies for generating and strategies for importance of revision not use effective generating and revising the generating and processes in strategies strategies to revising the information, revising the writing, successfully, revise the information, collaborated information, including: the was ineffective information, was collaborated well with others, collaborated creation of when ineffective when appropriately and provided effectively with multiple drafts; collaborating collaborating with others, and helpful feedback others, and development of with others (or with others, or provided helpful to peers. provided highly flexible did not did not provide feedback to effective strategies for collaborate), or helpful feedback peers. feedback to generating, did not provide to peers. peers. revising, editing, feedback to and peers. proofreading; using later invention and rethinking to revise; understanding the collaborative and social aspects of writing; and learning to critique his/her own writing and the writing of others. Knowledge of The writer The writer The writer The writer The writer Conventions displays serious displays shows displays clear shows highly weaknesses in unsatisfactory satisfactory understanding of effective The writer understanding understanding of understanding of conventions; understanding of illustrates the the conventions conventions conventions; effectively uses conventions; the ability to use the of written reflected in one uses appropriate formatting, information appropriate English; or more of the formatting, structure, commands conventions of inappropriate or following ways: structure, paragraphing, attention through format for
sources appropriate to the writing situation; and to integrate his/her information with that of others material), or it may not offer any ideas other than the writer’s own ideas. material, or may not synthesize the ideas of the writer with those of others. writer with those of others. information of the writer with that of others. synthesizes the ideas of the writer with those of others. Processes While writing to inform, the information and the writer’s performance create the information that he/she understands the importance of processes in writing, including: the creation of multiple drafts; development of flexible strategies for generating, revising, editing, and proofreading; using later invention and rethinking to revise; understanding the collaborative and social aspects of writing; and learning to critique his/her own writing and the writing of others. The writer exhibits serious weaknesses in understanding the processes of writing, usually of several kinds. The writer did not create more than one draft, did not use revision strategies successfully, was ineffective when collaborating with others (or did not collaborate), or did not provide feedback to peers. The writer displays unsatisfactory understanding of writing as a process reflected in one or more of the following ways: did not create more than one draft, did not use effective strategies to revise the information, was ineffective when collaborating with others, or did not provide helpful feedback to peers. The writer exhibits satisfactory understanding of writing as a process; the writer created at least two drafts, employed a few different strategies for generating and revising the information, collaborated appropriately with others, and provided helpful feedback to peers. The writer shows clear understanding of writing as a process; the writer created multiple drafts, employed flexible strategies for generating and revising the information, collaborated well with others, and provided helpful feedback to peers. The writer displays highly effective understanding of writing as a process; the writer created multiple drafts, employed flexible strategies for generating and revising the information, collaborated effectively with others, and provided highly effective feedback to peers. Knowledge of Conventions The writer illustrates the ability to use the appropriate conventions of format for The writer displays serious weaknesses in understanding the conventions of written English; inappropriate or The writer displays unsatisfactory understanding of conventions reflected in one or more of the following ways: The writer shows satisfactory understanding of conventions; uses appropriate formatting, structure, The writer displays clear understanding of conventions; effectively uses formatting, structure, paragraphing, The writer shows highly effective understanding of conventions; the information commands attention through
Dobrin_Ch10_WtInform_Rubric.docx