U.S. Department of Education. Ed. Faulkner-Bond, M., et al. 2012. Language Instruction Educational Programs (LIEPs): A review of the foundational literature. . Walqui, A., van Lier. 2010. Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. LITERACY: August, D., Shanahan, T., 2006. Executive Summary - Developing literacy in second-language learners: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Erlbaum Associates California Department of Education. Ed. Ong, F. 2010. Improving Education for English Learners: Sacramento: California Department of Education Press approaches. Callan, R. 2006. The intersection of accountability and language: can reading intervention replace English language development? 30(1). Bilingual Research Journal. Cappellini, M. 2005. Balancing reading and language learning: a resource for teaching English Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers. language learners K-5. Hill, J., Flynn, K. 2006. Alexandria, Classroom instruction that works with English language learners. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Horwitz, A.R., et al. 2009. Succeeding with English language learners: lessons learned for the great city schools. October 2009 Council of the Great City Schools. Goldenberg, C., Coleman, R. 2010. Promoting Academic Achievement English Learners: A guide Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. to the research. Goldenberg, C. 2008. Teaching English language learners: what the research does-and does not-say. Summer. American Educator. Marzano, R. 2003. Alexandria, VA: Association What works in schools: translating research into action. for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 18. 23. FOR THE DISTRICT ELD PROGRAM: – GOALS 18-19. GOALS 20-21. 22. MEASURE TIMEFRAME ENGLISH The percentage of students Common Weekly LANGUAGE advancing one level on ELPA will Assessments meetings PROFICIENCY increase from 52.15% to 53.65% by utilized Fall, Spring June, 2015. during the Fall, Spring Data Teams Spring AMAO2a: The percentage of all students Process exiting ELL services will increase from during 12% to 12.5% by June, 2015. weekly PLC meetings
U.S. Department of Education. Ed. Faulkner-Bond, M., et al. 2012. Language Instruction Educational Programs (LIEPs): A review of the foundational literature. . Walqui, A., van Lier. 2010. Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. LITERACY: August, D., Shanahan, T., 2006. Executive Summary - Developing literacy in second-language learners: report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates California Department of Education. Ed. Ong, F. 2010. Improving Education for English Learners: approaches. Sacramento: California Department of Education Press Callan, R. 2006. The intersection of accountability and language: can reading intervention replace English language development? Bilingual Research Journal. 30(1). Cappellini, M. 2005. Balancing reading and language learning: a resource for teaching English language learners K-5. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers. Hill, J., Flynn, K. 2006. Classroom instruction that works with English language learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Horwitz, A.R., et al. 2009. Succeeding with English language learners: lessons learned for the great city schools. Council of the Great City Schools. October 2009 Goldenberg, C., Coleman, R. 2010. Promoting Academic Achievement English Learners: A guide to the research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Goldenberg, C. 2008. Teaching English language learners: what the research does-and does not-say. American Educator. Summer. Marzano, R. 2003. What works in schools: translating research into action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 18. – 23. FOR THE DISTRICT ELD PROGRAM: GOALS 18-19. GOALS 20-21. MEASURE 22. TIMEFRAME ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY The percentage of students advancing one level on ELPA will increase from 52.15% to 53.65% by June, 2015. AMAO2a: The percentage of all students exiting ELL services will increase from 12% to 12.5% by June, 2015. Common Assessments utilized during the Data Teams Process during weekly PLC meetings Weekly meetings Fall, Spring Fall, Spring Spring
CSD-ELL-Plan-2015-1.docx