Support subfield items which are equal to 1." relevant to this amendment, but the inclusion of such a partial list might give some readers the impression that other reasons that arise from other subclaues in the specification might therefore be exempt from the action described here. 5024 289.28 9.42a.3 "If the TWT responding Append "Even" Reject the – STA has already as "Even if the commenter’s transmitted a non-zero TWT responding suggestion is to add an Next TWT Info/Suspend STA has already adverb will change Duration field ....., the transmitted a the language from TWT responding STA non-zero Next being purely may respond to the STA TWT descriptive to a more with a frame that Info/Suspend editorial form by contains a Next TWT Duration field ..., unnecessarily Info/Suspend Duration the TWT emphasizing the field." is not clear responding STA stipulated condition. enough. may respond .... E.g. why does “even” field." not appear in all instances of that “if” are followed by a clause that includes a normative verb? Which ones should include it and which should not? 5037 MARC 304.02 9.42f "(short) beacon interval" Replace "(short) Reject the current – -- using this wording beacon interval" form is more compact seems to require to with "short and satisfies the larger introduce a new beacon interval number of voters and abbreviation which could or beacon is nothing wrong easily be avoided by interval" with adding an using "short beacon abbreviation we have – interval or beacon a subclause dedicated interval". This would for that very purpose. alse prevent the use of parenthathes. 5038 MARC 304.03 9.42f "(short) beacon interval" Replace "(short) Reject the current – -- using this wording beacon interval" form is more compact seems to require to with "short and satisfies the larger introduce a new beacon interval number of voters and abbreviation which could or beacon there is nothing wrong easily be avoided by interval" with adding an using "short beacon abbreviation we have – interval or beacon a subclause dedicated interval". This would for that very purpose. alse prevent the use of parenthathes.
Support subfield equal to 1." items which are relevant to this amendment, but the inclusion of such a partial list might give some readers the impression that other reasons that arise from other subclaues in the specification might therefore be exempt from the action described here. 5024 289.28 9.42a.3 "If the TWT responding STA has already transmitted a non-zero Next TWT Info/Suspend Duration field ....., the TWT responding STA may respond to the STA with a frame that contains a Next TWT Info/Suspend Duration field." is not clear enough. Append "Even" as "Even if the TWT responding STA has already transmitted a non-zero Next TWT Info/Suspend Duration field ..., the TWT responding STA may respond .... field." Reject – the commenter’s suggestion is to add an adverb will change the language from being purely descriptive to a more editorial form by unnecessarily emphasizing the stipulated condition. E.g. why does “even” not appear in all instances of “if” that are followed by a clause that includes a normative verb? Which ones should include it and which should not? 5037 MARC 304.02 9.42f "(short) beacon interval" -- using this wording seems to require to introduce a new abbreviation which could easily be avoided by using "short beacon interval or beacon interval". This would alse prevent the use of parenthathes. Replace "(short) beacon interval" with "short beacon interval or beacon interval" Reject – the current form is more compact and satisfies the larger number of voters and is nothing wrong with adding an abbreviation – we have a subclause dedicated for that very purpose. 5038 MARC 304.03 9.42f "(short) beacon interval" -- using this wording seems to require to introduce a new abbreviation which could easily be avoided by using "short beacon interval or beacon interval". This would alse prevent the use of parenthathes. Replace "(short) beacon interval" with "short beacon interval or beacon interval" Reject – the current form is more compact and satisfies the larger number of voters and there is nothing wrong with adding an abbreviation – we have a subclause dedicated for that very purpose.
11-15-0083-00-00ah-lb205-twt-sst-cids-not-grouptwt.docx