No new presentations, other than those listed in the agenda, were requested. The Chair asked for approval of the agenda No objection raised Presentation of contributions 662r2 Further consideration on channel access rule to facilitate MU transmission opportunity #1 (pre-motion): Do you to add to the following to 11ax TG SFD: Do you agree to allow the AP choose any access category for contending to send the trigger frame? The chosen AC may give to the AP higher priority in accessing the channel compared to its associated STAs Y/N/A: 8/0/many Strawpoll passes 664r2 Consideration on backoff procedure for UL MU transmission #1 Do you support? The non-AP STA resets its backoff counter after successfully transmitting an UL PPDU as the response to trigger frame. Y/N/A: 8/13/16 #2 Do you support? The non-AP STA keeps the backoff counter unchanged after successfully transmitting an UL PPDU as the response to trigger frame. Y/N/A: 19/1/21 665r0 Some Notes on Interference Alignment for Downlink Multi-User MIMO The strawpolls were moved to the TGax joint session because the topic requires the presence of PHY experts. 667r0 Signaling of Multi-TID Aggregation Limit #1: Do you agree to add to the TGax SFD The basic variant Trigger frame shall contain the TID Aggregation Limit subfield in the Trigger Dependent Per User Info field that indicates the limit of the number of TIDs that can be aggregated by a STA in a multi-TID A-MPDU carried in the responding Trigger-based PPDU? The responding STA not aggregate QoS Data frames in the multi-TID with a number of TIDs that exceeds the value indicated in the TID Aggregation Limit sub-field intended to it Y/N/A: 32/0/7 Strawpoll passes 0582r3 Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
No new presentations, other than those listed in the agenda, were requested. The Chair asked for approval of the agenda No objection raised Presentation of contributions 662r2 Further consideration on channel access rule to facilitate MU transmission opportunity #1 (pre-motion): Do you to add to the following to 11ax TG SFD: Do you agree to allow the AP choose any access category for contending to send the trigger frame? The chosen AC may give to the AP higher priority in accessing the channel compared to its associated STAs Y/N/A: 8/0/many Strawpoll passes 664r2 Consideration on backoff procedure for UL MU transmission #1 Do you support? The non-AP STA resets its backoff counter after successfully transmitting an UL PPDU as the response to trigger frame. Y/N/A: 8/13/16 #2 Do you support? The non-AP STA keeps the backoff counter unchanged after successfully transmitting an UL PPDU as the response to trigger frame. Y/N/A: 19/1/21 665r0 Some Notes on Interference Alignment for Downlink Multi-User MIMO The strawpolls were moved to the TGax joint session because the topic requires the presence of PHY experts. 667r0 Signaling of Multi-TID Aggregation Limit #1: Do you agree to add to the TGax SFD The basic variant Trigger frame shall contain the TID Aggregation Limit subfield in the Trigger Dependent Per User Info field that indicates the limit of the number of TIDs that can be aggregated by a STA in a multi-TID A-MPDU carried in the responding Trigger-based PPDU? The responding STA not aggregate QoS Data frames in the multi-TID with a number of TIDs that exceeds the value indicated in the TID Aggregation Limit sub-field intended to it Y/N/A: 32/0/7 Strawpoll passes 0582r3 Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
11-16-0716-00-00ax-mu-ad-hoc-meeting-minutes-may-2016.docx