2208 120.07 10.24.7.1 What is the point of the delete: "That is, a block ack sentence: "That is, a block agreement with ack agreement with segmentation and segmentation and reassembly is an reassembly is an block ack block ack agreement." agreement." It doesn't seem to provide any useful information as this whole section is related to block ack. Proposal: Accept 2209 121.19 10.24.7.3 I think it would be cleaner Remove the changes to and less confusing if the 10.24.7.3 and 10.24.7.4 and various cases were move them to new clauses separated. Hence, I think 10.24.7.3a and 10.24.7.4a 10.24.7.3 would become which define the operation Scoreboard context control when segmentation and during full-state operation reassembly are present. without segmentation and reassembly. And 10.24.7.4 would also state it is without segmentation and reassembly. A new sections 10.24.73a and 10.24.7.4a could be added for the case with segmentation and reassembly. 2210 121.39 10.24.7.4 I think it would be cleaner Remove the changes to and less confusing if the 10.24.7.3 and 10.24.7.4 and various cases were move them to new clauses separated. Hence I think 10.24.7.3a and 10.24.7.4a 10.24.7.3 would become which define the operation Scoreboard context control when segmentation and during full-state operation reassembly are present. without segmentation and reassembly. And 10.24.7.4 would also state it is without segmentation and reassembly. A new sections 10.24.73a and 10.24.7.4a could be added for the case with segmentation and reassembly. Proposal: Reject
2208 120.07 10.24.7.1 What is the point of the sentence: "That is, a block ack agreement with segmentation and reassembly is an block ack agreement." It doesn't seem to provide any useful information as this whole section is related to block ack. delete: "That is, a block ack agreement with segmentation and reassembly is an block ack agreement." Proposal: Accept 2209 121.19 10.24.7.3 I think it would be cleaner and less confusing if the various cases were separated. Hence, I think 10.24.7.3 would become Scoreboard context control during full-state operation without segmentation and reassembly. And 10.24.7.4 would also state it is without segmentation and reassembly. A new sections 10.24.73a and 10.24.7.4a could be added for the case with segmentation and reassembly. Remove the changes to 10.24.7.3 and 10.24.7.4 and move them to new clauses 10.24.7.3a and 10.24.7.4a which define the operation when segmentation and reassembly are present. 2210 121.39 10.24.7.4 I think it would be cleaner and less confusing if the various cases were separated. Hence I think 10.24.7.3 would become Scoreboard context control during full-state operation without segmentation and reassembly. And 10.24.7.4 would also state it is without segmentation and reassembly. A new sections 10.24.73a and 10.24.7.4a could be added for the case with segmentation and reassembly. Remove the changes to 10.24.7.3 and 10.24.7.4 and move them to new clauses 10.24.7.3a and 10.24.7.4a which define the operation when segmentation and reassembly are present. Proposal: Reject
11-18-0278-00-00ay-comment-resolution-of-multiple-cids-in-relation-to-sub-clause-10-24.docx