reception of that MMPDU." That combination is reserved. Ack Type should be 1. Or maybe it's Table 9-24b that's wrong? "If the ACK Type subfield is 0 and the TID value of the Per AID TID Info subfield is 15, then the Block Ack Starting Sequence Control, 2 octets reserved and RA fields are present and the Per AID TID Info field acknowledges a Management frame sent by an unassociated non-AP STA.". Why not align all of these so that it's always Ack Type 1 and TID 15 to ack an MMPDU? Or at least the second quoted para needs to be explicitly restricted to AID11==2045 12991 Massinissa 81.46 A table similar to Table Create a table Revised. Lalam 9-24b should be equivalent to Table See the instructions produced when the AID but adressing the to the TGax editor in subfield is 2045 to case when AID is 2045 doc. 11-18/0890. clarify the behavior and Deleted the cited available combination. paragraph, as it is Otherwise, the line 46 already covered by seems a bit out of place the last sentence in (for AID subfield not the paragraph just equal to 2045, the before NOTE 1. combination described by this line (AckType=1 and TID=15) is N/A. 12598 Mark 81.51 This para and the next Delete the paras in Rejected. one seem to duplicate question. Move The 2 paragraphs Table 9-24b behavioural are to help the information (e.g. interpretation of "acknowledges Table 9-24b. They successful reception of are explaining the a single frame format setting indicated by the TID of and should be here the AID TID Info in subclause subfield") to Clause 27 9.3.1.9.7. 12367 Liwen Chu 81.59 "The responding STA Change the text per Rejected. determines that all the the comment. The sentence MPDUs carried in the explains how to eliciting A-MPDU are determine that all successfully the MPDUs carried
reception of that MMPDU." That combination is reserved. Ack Type should be 1. Or maybe it's Table 9-24b that's wrong? "If the ACK Type subfield is 0 and the TID value of the Per AID TID Info subfield is 15, then the Block Ack Starting Sequence Control, 2 octets reserved and RA fields are present and the Per AID TID Info field acknowledges a Management frame sent by an unassociated non-AP STA.". Why not align all of these so that it's always Ack Type 1 and TID 15 to ack an MMPDU? Or at least the second quoted para needs to be explicitly restricted to AID11==2045 12991 Massinissa Lalam 81.46 A table similar to Table 9-24b should be produced when the AID subfield is 2045 to clarify the behavior and available combination. Otherwise, the line 46 seems a bit out of place (for AID subfield not equal to 2045, the combination described by this line (AckType=1 and TID=15) is N/A. Create a table equivalent to Table but adressing the case when AID is 2045 Revised. See the instructions to the TGax editor in doc. 11-18/0890. Deleted the cited paragraph, as it is already covered by the last sentence in the paragraph just before NOTE 1. 12598 Mark 81.51 This para and the next one seem to duplicate Table 9-24b Delete the paras in question. Move behavioural information (e.g. "acknowledges successful reception of a single indicated by the TID of the AID TID Info subfield") to Clause 27 Rejected. The 2 paragraphs are to help the interpretation of Table 9-24b. They are explaining the frame format setting and should be here in subclause 9.3.1.9.7. 12367 Liwen Chu 81.59 "The responding STA determines that all the MPDUs carried in the eliciting A-MPDU are successfully Change the text per the comment. Rejected. The sentence explains how to determine that all the MPDUs carried
11-18-0890-00-00ax-resolutions-to-lb230-comments-submitted-to-subclauses-9-3-1-9-3-and-9-3-1-9-7.docx