no need to have this such as is seperate Clause. described in R.7. 31 "The Estimated Air Replace cited with Revise TGmd – Time Fraction subfield "The Estimated Air editor to make Smith is 8 bits in length and Time Fraction changes as shown contains an unsigned subfield is 8 bits in in 11-17/1192r4 integer that represents length and contains that are marked the predicted an unsigned integer with CID 31 percentage of time, that represents the linearly scaled with predicted 255 representing percentage of time, 100%, that a new STA linearly scaled with joining the BSS will be 255 representing allocated for PPDUs 100%, not used by that contain only PPDUs that contain MPDUs with the Type only MPDUs with subfield equal to Data the Type subfield of the corresponding equal to Data, of access category for the corresponding that STA." access category." "Allocated"? So the STA is using HCCA, or EDCA Admission Control? What scheme is in use here that we have allocation of BW to specific STAs, and traffic? In addition, what is %, the fraction of all traffic or fraction of just that AC traffic? This is unclear, but why have this for every AC and how is this to be interpreted? Also unclear how an AP would even measure this. I am generally unhappy with this, I might make a presentation. 30 "A-MPDU aggregation Change cited text Reject nothing is – is expected to be after the comma to missing. are Smith performed for MPDUs "but A-MSDU aggregated into with the Type subfield aggregation is not AMPDUs, and equal to Data for the expected to be MPDUs have a corresponding AC, but performed for MAC header with a A-MSDU aggregation MSDUs with the type and subtype is not expected to be Type subfield not and TID. A-MSDUs performed for MSDUs equal to Data for are built from for the corresponding the corresponding MSDUs which do AC". Seems to be AC ." not have a MAC missing something. header and therefore do not have type or subtype but by
no need to have this seperate Clause. such as is described in R.7. 31 Smith "The Estimated Air Time Fraction subfield is 8 bits in length and contains an unsigned integer that represents the predicted percentage of time, linearly scaled with 255 representing 100%, that a new STA joining the BSS will be allocated for PPDUs that contain only MPDUs with the Type subfield equal to Data of the corresponding access category for that STA." "Allocated"? So the STA is using HCCA, or EDCA Admission Control? What scheme is in use here that we have allocation of BW to specific STAs, and traffic? In addition, what is %, the fraction of all traffic or fraction of just that AC traffic? This is unclear, but why have this for every AC and how is this to be interpreted? Also unclear how an AP would even measure this. I am generally unhappy with this, I might make a presentation. Replace cited with "The Estimated Air Time Fraction subfield is 8 bits in length and contains an unsigned integer that represents the predicted percentage of time, linearly scaled with 255 representing 100%, not used by PPDUs that contain only MPDUs with the Type subfield equal to Data, of the corresponding access category." Revise – TGmd editor to make changes as shown in 11-17/1192r4 that are marked with CID 31 30 Smith "A-MPDU aggregation is expected to be performed for MPDUs with the Type subfield equal to Data for the corresponding AC, but A-MSDU aggregation is not expected to be performed for MSDUs for the corresponding AC". Seems to be missing something. Change cited text after the comma to "but A-MSDU aggregation is not expected to be performed for MSDUs with the Type subfield not equal to Data for the corresponding AC ." Reject – nothing is missing. are aggregated into AMPDUs, and MPDUs have a MAC header with a type and subtype and TID. A-MSDUs are built from MSDUs which do not have a MAC header and therefore do not have type or subtype but by
11-17-1192-05-000m-cr-esp.docx