CID Page geographical There is no grouping. reason to choose a different terminology. Proposed CID Page Clause Comment Resolution Change 768 TACK and unify to 4 Rejected - BAT include least TACK, 5 significant BAT, significant octets for STACK, octets of partial short TSF timer timestamp. beacon as partial and short timestamp probe while response STACK, are short optimized beacon and for their short probe specific response use case. It carry only 4 is not least necessary significant to unifying octets. This it with seems single inconsistent. format. 769 TACK and Equivalent Rejected - BAT include 4 least TACK, 5 least significant BAT, significant octets for STACK, octets of partial short TSF timer timestamp beacon as partial may be and short timestamp preferable. probe while response STACK, are short optimized beacon and for their short probe specific response use case. It carry only 4 is not least necessary significant to unifying octets. This it with seems single inconsistent. format. Proposed CID Page Clause Comment Resolution Change 772 Transmission density Rejected – power limit entries
CID Page geographical grouping. There is no reason to choose a different terminology. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 768 TACK and BAT include 5 significant octets of TSF timer as partial timestamp while STACK, short beacon and short probe response carry only 4 least significant octets. This seems inconsistent. unify to 4 least significant octets for partial timestamp. Rejected - TACK, BAT, STACK, short beacon and short probe response are optimized for their specific use case. It is not necessary to unifying it with single format. 769 TACK and BAT include 5 least significant octets of TSF timer as partial timestamp while STACK, short beacon and short probe response carry only 4 least significant octets. This seems inconsistent. Equivalent 4 least significant octets for partial timestamp may be preferable. Rejected - TACK, BAT, STACK, short beacon and short probe response are optimized for their specific use case. It is not necessary to unifying it with single format. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 772 Transmission power density limit entries Rejected –
11-13-1087-00-00ah-cc9-miscellaneous-comment-resolution.docx