ax editor: please make the following changes in Clause 26.3.9: On P152L38 (CID #1977): Move definition of and 26-13 after equation (26-6), the definition of. On P153L.48 (CID #1978): Move definition of and to be the sub-bullets of . CID Commenter Section Page Comment Proposed Change Resolution Siguard The text reads 1971 26.3.9 152.2 PE is not defined as an Revised. Schelstraete "each subfield is Change to as inverse Fourier defined to be an in the transform inverse discrete resolution of Fourier transform". CID1971 in This is not true for doc the PE field. 1973 Siguard 26.3.9 152.9 subscript should be (26-4) is a defintion Rejected. Schelstraete of a subfield, not a "subfield" instead of Equation field. Subscript of is a field the right-hand side definition of of the equation field, , which should be sums corrected. subfields over k, m, and u. 1974 Siguard 26.3.9 152.2 Field -> subfield Change "each field" Rejected. Schelstraete to "each subfield" Equation and correct is a subscript in definition of equation (26.5) and field , which on line 23. sums subfields over k, m, and u. 1976 Siguard 26.3.9 152.4 Change "Equation 26-4" See comment Revised. Schelstraete to "Equations 26-4 and Change to as in the 26-5" resolution of CID1976 in doc Discussion: The commenter is that PE is not defined as an inverse Fourier transform. But Equation (26-4) is a definition of , which sums subfields over k, m, and u. We can rephrase the sentence to make it clear. ax editor: please make the following changes in D0.4 Clause 26.3.9: On P152L2 (CID #1971), On P152L4 (CID #1976): In an HE SU PPDU, HE MU PPDU and HE extended range SU PPDU, each field , , is defined as the summation of one or more subfields subfield is defined to be an inverse discrete Fourier transform.
ax editor: please make the following changes in Clause 26.3.9: On P152L38 (CID #1977): Move definition of and 26-13 after equation (26-6), the definition of. On P153L.48 (CID #1978): Move definition of and to be the sub-bullets of . CID Commenter Section Page Comment Proposed Change Resolution 1971 Siguard Schelstraete 26.3.9 152.2 PE is not defined as an inverse Fourier transform The text reads "each subfield is defined to be an inverse discrete Fourier transform". This is not true for the PE field. Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID1971 in doc 1973 Siguard Schelstraete 26.3.9 152.9 subscript should be "subfield" instead of field (26-4) is a defintion of a subfield, not a field. Subscript of the right-hand side of the equation should be corrected. Rejected. Equation is a definition of field, , which sums subfields over k, m, and u. 1974 Siguard Schelstraete 26.3.9 152.2 Field -> subfield Change "each field" to "each subfield" and correct subscript in equation (26.5) and on line 23. Rejected. Equation is a definition of field , which sums subfields over k, m, and u. 1976 Siguard Schelstraete 26.3.9 152.4 Change "Equation 26-4" to "Equations 26-4 and 26-5" See comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID1976 in doc Discussion: The commenter is that PE is not defined as an inverse Fourier transform. But Equation (26-4) is a definition of , which sums subfields over k, m, and u. We can rephrase the sentence to make it clear. ax editor: please make the following changes in D0.4 Clause 26.3.9: On P152L2 (CID #1971), On P152L4 (CID #1976): In an HE SU PPDU, HE MU PPDU and HE extended range SU PPDU, each field , , is defined as the summation of one or more subfields subfield is defined to be an inverse discrete Fourier transform.
11-16-1136-02-00ax-11ax-comment-resolutions-for-clause-26-3-8.docx