15709 27.9.2.4 349.15 Please clarify TX_PWR in the Please clarify. Reject the definition of – case of a MIMO transmision antenna connector is clarifying "TXPWR is the STA this point already in the transmission power in dBm at specification. the output of the antenna connector." 27.9.2.4 349.55 "Not applicable if the Please include conditions for Revised agree with the – Spatial Reuse Parameter AP as well commenter. table is only for a Set element is not non-AP STA. Apply the changes received" for the case of AP, it as proposed in doc . shall be "Not applicable if the Spatial Reuse Parameter Set element is not transmitted." 27.9.2.4 351.60 Change "OBSS_PDmax as described Reject there is redundancy – indeed, but this helps the ΓëÑOBSS_PDlevel >OBSS_Pdmin" to " understanding. OBSS_PDlevel > OBSS_Pdmin" because first part of condition is already specified in Equation 27-4, no need to repeat here. 15715 27.9.2.5 352.61 In Example shown in Figure as described Revised agree with the – please clarify that a STA commenter. Add some words might choose to maintain the about this in the example same OBSS_PDlevel with the description. Apply the changes same TX_PWRmax1 and not as proposed in doc . ignore the PPDU from D1. Same situation as receiving PPDU from S1' and D1'.
15709 27.9.2.4 349.15 Please clarify TX_PWR in the case of a MIMO transmision "TXPWR is the STA transmission power in dBm at the output of the antenna connector." Please clarify. Reject – the definition of antenna connector is clarifying this point already in the specification. 27.9.2.4 349.55 "Not applicable if the Spatial Reuse Parameter Set element is not received" for the case of AP, it shall be "Not applicable if the Spatial Reuse Parameter Set element is not transmitted." Please include conditions for AP as well Revised – agree with the commenter. table is only for a non-AP STA. Apply the changes as proposed in doc . 27.9.2.4 351.60 Change "OBSS_PDmax ΓëÑOBSS_PDlevel >OBSS_Pdmin" to " OBSS_PDlevel > OBSS_Pdmin" because first part of condition is already specified in Equation 27-4, no need to repeat here. as described Reject – there is redundancy indeed, but this helps the understanding. 15715 27.9.2.5 352.61 In Example shown in Figure please clarify that a STA might choose to maintain the same OBSS_PDlevel with the same TX_PWRmax1 and not ignore the PPDU from D1. Same situation as receiving PPDU from S1' and D1'. as described Revised – agree with the commenter. Add some words about this in the example description. Apply the changes as proposed in doc .
11-18-1495-02-00ax-cr-for-obss-pd.docx