in 9.4.1.22. This name is and “Channel” indicates a channel subfield is a channel number. number 28 35.64 9.4.2.274 Channel number missing Rejected. No change has been from WUR Discovery proposed. Channel field This is same as in 9.4.1.22 the field name is and “Channel” indicates a channel number. Similar language is also used for Channel” field “WUR in the WUR Operation element. As in comment. 61 23.57 9.3.3.3 Revised. needs to be true Agree in principle with also for the WUR the commenter. discovery case. Please apply throughout these TGax editor to make the tables for each WUR changes shown in Discovery entry under all headings that include CID 61. 78 35.50 9.4.2.276 What is the difference As in comment. Rejected. WUR Discovery between the WUR operating class, channel Discovery operating class, identify the channel channel and the WUR used to transmit WUR operating class, channel Discovery frame, while indicated in the WUR WUR operating class, Operation element? Also channel indicated in the why is the element WUR Operation providing a list of other element identify the APs? Couldn't we use the channel used to Neighbor Report element transmit WUR Beacon frames. List of other for this purpose? APs are provided to help narrow down the number of WUR Discovery channels to be scanned during WUR scanning. During the design phase, it was agreed not to reuse Neighbor Report element but to design a new element optimized for WUR Discovery use. 80 36.31 9.4.2.276 Terminology is already As in comment. Accepted. defined. This is a TGax editor to make the AP. So instead of changes shown in saying Transmitting WUR under all AP simply say Co-Located headings that include WUR AP. CID 80.
in 9.4.1.22. This subfield is a channel number name is “Channel” and indicates a channel number. 28 35.64 9.4.2.274 Channel number missing from WUR Discovery Channel field Rejected. No change has been proposed. This is same as in 9.4.1.22 the field name is “Channel” and indicates a channel number. Similar language is also used for “WUR Channel” field in the WUR Operation element. 61 23.57 9.3.3.3 needs to be true also for the WUR discovery case. Please apply throughout these tables for each WUR Discovery entry As in comment. Revised. Agree in principle with the commenter. TGax editor to make the changes shown in under all headings that include CID 61. 78 35.50 9.4.2.276 What is the difference between the WUR Discovery operating class, channel and the WUR operating class, channel indicated in the WUR Operation element? Also why is the element providing a list of other APs? Couldn't we use the Neighbor Report element for this purpose? As in comment. Rejected. WUR Discovery operating class, channel identify the channel used to transmit WUR Discovery frame, while WUR operating class, channel indicated in the WUR Operation element identify the channel used to transmit WUR Beacon frames. List of other APs are provided to help narrow down the number of WUR Discovery channels to be scanned during WUR scanning. During the design phase, it was agreed not to reuse Neighbor Report element but to design a new element optimized for WUR Discovery use. 80 36.31 9.4.2.276 Terminology is already defined. This is a AP. So instead of saying Transmitting WUR AP simply say Co-Located WUR AP. As in comment. Accepted. TGax editor to make the changes shown in under all headings that include CID 80.
11-18-1881-01-00ba-crs-for-wur-discovery-element.docx