The statement "An HE AP delete "An HE AP indicates Revised. 7414 Lei Huang indicates the values of the values of OCWmin and OCWmin and OCWmax in the OCWmax in the RAPS Agree in principle. RAPS element in a Beacon or element in a Beacon or Probe The redundant sentence on Probe Response frame for the Response frame for the HE AP is deleted and random access operation. random access operation. replaced by a sentence OCWmax is the upper limit of OCWmax is the upper limit of clarifying the behavior of the OCW." is redundant since OCW." HE STA. there is the similar statement in Section 27.5.2.6.1 (see TGax Editor to make the L38-L43 of P172). changes to 802.11ax D1.2 as in 11-17/0645r2 under all headings that include CID 7414. 8282 Pascal HE STA shall use the most Modify the sentence of 4th Revised. 1 Viger recently RAPS element, but paragraph: "An HE STA shall Agree in principle. The this element should be use the OCWmin and proposed changes included received from the intended OCWmax values indicated in in the current document AP ! the RAPS element within clarify the obtaining rules of Beacon or Probe Response the OCWmin and OCWmax frames most recently received values by the AP emitting the Trigger Frame, regardless of the TGax Editor to make the access category...". changes to 802.11ax D1.2 as in 11-17/0645r2 under all headings that include CID 8282. An AP only "may" include A non-AP STA must define 8300 Patrice Revised 1 RAPS element even if UL default values for OCWmin Comment very similar to OFDMA-based random and OCWmax previous CID#7410. access is unable. How can as per #7410 resolution. the STA set OCWmin and OCWmax itself if no RAPS is sent by the AP?
7414 Lei Huang The statement "An HE AP indicates the values of OCWmin and OCWmax in the RAPS element in a Beacon or Probe Response frame for the random access operation. OCWmax is the upper limit of OCW." is redundant since there is the similar statement in Section 27.5.2.6.1 (see L38-L43 of P172). delete "An HE AP indicates the values of OCWmin and OCWmax in the RAPS element in a Beacon or Probe Response frame for the random access operation. OCWmax is the upper limit of OCW." Revised. Agree in principle. The redundant sentence on HE AP is deleted and replaced by a sentence clarifying the behavior of the HE STA. TGax Editor to make the changes to 802.11ax D1.2 as in 11-17/0645r2 under all headings that include CID 7414. 8282 Pascal Viger HE STA shall use the most recently RAPS element, but this element should be received from the intended AP ! Modify the sentence of 4th paragraph: "An HE STA shall use the OCWmin and OCWmax values indicated in the RAPS element within Beacon or Probe Response frames most recently received by the AP emitting the Trigger Frame, regardless of the access category...". Revised. Agree in principle. The proposed changes included in the current document clarify the obtaining rules of the OCWmin and OCWmax values TGax Editor to make the changes to 802.11ax D1.2 as in 11-17/0645r2 under all headings that include CID 8282. 8300 Patrice An AP only "may" include RAPS element even if UL OFDMA-based random access is unable. How can the STA set OCWmin and OCWmax itself if no RAPS is sent by the AP? A non-AP STA must define default values for OCWmin and OCWmax Revised Comment very similar to previous CID#7410. as per #7410 resolution. 1 1
11-17-0645-02-00ax-cr-for-section-27-5-2-6-raps.docx