for an access category is equal to 0 in the primitive, the STA may use any value for the average MSDU size used in calculating the estimated throughput to be included in the corresponding access category in the respective or parameter of the primitive, but should use a value of 1500 octets. " 54 11.45 Where did this Either change 5dB Revise TGmd – "Beacon RSSI" come to 1dB, or delete editor to make Smith from (shame on me for this clause and all changes as shown missing it) ? What is it references to in 11-17/1192r14 used for? I see no dot11BeaconRssi that are marked dirrect reference to with CID 54, using it anywhere, commenter to see unless it is P2049L1, 11.45 Beacon and if so why a RSSI. Accuracy seperate clause??. value was agreed Also +/-5dB is upon by discussion useless, differing MCS among PHY EVM requirements are experts. Again, this much tighter than 5dB, parameter is it needs to be +/-1dB. already We need to tighten up successfully used on all these RSSI today in existing measurements, there systems and while is no reason why we the accuracy might need to stick to +/- not be as high as 5dB we should be desired, experts did making a target of not agree that a 1dB. As many will more accurate know I have been value was possible advocating the DSC and useful output is mechanism that uses generated in real the Beacon RSSI. As systems with an such an algorithm for accuracy estimated determining the to be about 5dB. Beacon RSSI has Commenter can been presented that review equation
for an access category is equal to 0 in the primitive, the STA may use any value for the average MSDU size used in calculating the estimated throughput to be included in the corresponding access category in the respective or parameter of the primitive, but should use a value of 1500 octets. " 54 Smith 11.45 Where did this "Beacon RSSI" come from (shame on me for missing it) ? What is it used for? I see no dirrect reference to using it anywhere, unless it is P2049L1, and if so why a seperate clause??. Also +/-5dB is useless, differing MCS EVM requirements are much tighter than 5dB, it needs to be +/-1dB. We need to tighten up on all these RSSI measurements, there is no reason why we need to stick to +/- 5dB we should be making a target of 1dB. As many will know I have been advocating the DSC mechanism that uses the Beacon RSSI. As such an algorithm for determining the Beacon RSSI has been presented that Either change 5dB to 1dB, or delete this clause and all references to dot11BeaconRssi Revise – TGmd editor to make changes as shown in 11-17/1192r14 that are marked with CID 54, commenter to see 11.45 Beacon RSSI. Accuracy value was agreed upon by discussion among PHY experts. Again, this parameter is already successfully used today in existing systems and while the accuracy might not be as high as desired, experts did not agree that a more accurate value was possible and useful output is generated in real systems with an accuracy estimated to be about 5dB. Commenter can review equation
11-17-1192-14-000m-cr-esp.docx