802.11 WLAN user general MAC frame experience" which, per structure of IEEE 802.11 the WG definition, means base base specification. using the 802.11 MAC. This also seems like the wrong place to make this statement as the subcluse is "general" and not limited to control frames. 8432 "10.48 Dynamic AID Move "10.48 Dynamic AID Rejected- assignment operation": assignment operation" to a 10.48 (Dynamic AID this subclause specifies location between 9.20 and assignment operation) is general MAC functionality, 9.21 (so this subclause describing the AID not just MLME features, becomes the new 9.21). update procedure. so it does not belong in Also rename it to "S1G the MLME clause. dynamic AID assignment". Its reference section is 10.3.5 (Association, reassociation, and disassociation) in IEEE 802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8436 "10.49 System Move subclause "10.49 Rejected- information update Channel selection methods 10.49 (System procedure": this for an S1G BSS" to a information update subclause specifies MAC location between S1G procedure) is describing function operation, not BSS functionality"(the new the system information just MLME features. But 9.42.1) and "Channel update mechanism. this operation is part of selection methods" (the new the S1G operation, so 9.42.3). Also rename this Its reference section is make it a subclause of the subclause "S1G BSS 10.2.2.17 (TIM "S1G BSS operation" channel selection methods". Broadcast) in IEEE clause. After moving the 802.11 base "S1G BSS operation" specification. subclause from 10.50 to the new 9.42, make the The BRC can not identify current 10.49 subclause which operation is the new 9.42.2. considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed.
802.11 WLAN user experience" which, per the WG definition, means using the 802.11 MAC. This also seems like the wrong place to make this statement as the subcluse is "general" and not limited to control frames. general MAC frame structure of IEEE 802.11 base base specification. 8432 "10.48 Dynamic AID assignment operation": this subclause specifies general MAC functionality, not just MLME features, so it does not belong in the MLME clause. Move "10.48 Dynamic AID assignment operation" to a location between 9.20 and 9.21 (so this subclause becomes the new 9.21). Also rename it to "S1G dynamic AID assignment". Rejected- 10.48 (Dynamic AID assignment operation) is describing the AID update procedure. Its reference section is 10.3.5 (Association, reassociation, and disassociation) in IEEE 802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8436 "10.49 System information update procedure": this subclause specifies MAC function operation, not just MLME features. But this operation is part of the S1G operation, so make it a subclause of the "S1G BSS operation" clause. After moving the "S1G BSS operation" subclause from 10.50 to the new 9.42, make the current 10.49 subclause the new 9.42.2. Move subclause "10.49 Channel selection methods for an S1G BSS" to a location between S1G BSS functionality"(the new 9.42.1) and "Channel selection methods" (the new 9.42.3). Also rename this subclause "S1G BSS channel selection methods". Rejected- 10.49 (System information update procedure) is describing the system information update mechanism. Its reference section is 10.2.2.17 (TIM Broadcast) in IEEE 802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed.
11-16-0020-01-00ah-sb0-comment-resolution-part5.docx