However, Exchange of clear they were not dealing between with very counsel is many very useful documents for the in Guano, chambers not like the judge volume of should an documents application seen in be made modern major is now litigation key. The rule My Thoughts must be This is a curbed and response to require the some volumes of specificity documents otherwise and it becomes information totally that it is now possible to My thoughts have in the to be that the age emphasis The move on full away from disclosure the Guano of this kind is so that in the parties face of the can’t get modern away with covering realities their tracks can also be by hiding a seen in of Privest ‘train inquiry’ Property v that might WR Grace lead to BCCA 1992. something In Grace, which is the BCSC now ordered outside the that the scope of defendant the allow the litigation, plaintiff to
However, clear they were not dealing with very many documents in Guano, not like the volume of documents seen in modern major litigation The rule must be curbed and require some specificity otherwise it becomes totally My thoughts to be that the emphasis on full disclosure of this kind is so that parties can’t get away with covering their tracks by hiding a ‘train of inquiry’ that might lead to something which is now outside the scope of the litigation, Exchange of between counsel is very useful for the chambers judge should an application be made is now key. My Thoughts This is a response to the volumes of documents and information that it is now possible to have in the age The move away from the Guano in the face of the modern realities can also be seen in Privest Property v WR Grace BCCA 1992. In Grace, the BCSC ordered that the defendant allow the plaintiff to
115-Thomson-_Law_307-Final.docx