Results statement: No. Indicator Baseline Milestones (2014) Target (2017) Percentage of country programme outcomes that are reported as At least 5% At least 10% 1. either on-track or achieved (cross checked with evaluation 50% (2013) increase increase findings) MDGs: 58% Poverty eradication: 44% Percentage of partners perceiving UNDP as an effective 65% for each 70% for each Democratic governance: 56% 2. contributor in identified areas Crisis prevention and recovery: 45% outcome outcome Environment and Sustainable Development: 56% 1.1 Programme Percentage of project outputs which are reported as achieved or 3. TBD TBD TBD effectiveness on track enhanced for Percentage of Country Office annual results reports which meet or achieving results at all 4. exceed expected organizational quality standards (QCPR related 67% (2012) 70% 90% levels through quality indicator) criteria and quality Percentage of projects meeting or exceeding organizational quality assurance processes 5. TBD TBD TBD standards (QCPR related indicator) Percentage of new country programme documents that meet 6. organizational standards in the first submission for internal 73% (first quarter 2014) TBD TBD appraisal (QCPR related indicator) Percentage of UNDP staff surveyed who report satisfaction with: 7 UNDP policy services TBD TBD TBD UNDP programme/project guidelines and support (2013) 50% of on-going projects recorded in the capacity tracker: Percentage of projects by type that meet quality standards for - 88% had at least 1 of the 4 8. TBD TBD capacity development (QCPR related indicator) envisaged capacity development 1.2 UNDP’s key components development - 36% had all 4 components approaches fully 40% (8% gender 57% (15% gender integrated into UNDP Percentage of expenditures with a significant gender (2013) 30% (4% gender projects and projects and 32% projects and 42% programmes and component and with gender as a principal objective. 26% projects with a significant projects with a projects with a projects for more (QCPR related indicator) gender component) significant gender significant gender 9. durable results Number of country offices that and report on component) component) expenditures using gender markers validated by a quality 34 country offices (2013 2014) 70 assurance process. [COMMON QCPR INDICATOR] –
Results statement: No. Indicator Baseline Milestones (2014) Target (2017) 1.1 Programme effectiveness enhanced for achieving results at all levels through quality criteria and quality assurance processes 1. Percentage of country programme outcomes that are reported as either on-track or achieved (cross checked with evaluation findings) 50% (2013) At least 5% increase At least 10% increase 2. Percentage of partners perceiving UNDP as an effective contributor in identified areas MDGs: 58% Poverty eradication: 44% Democratic governance: 56% Crisis prevention and recovery: 45% Environment and Sustainable Development: 56% 65% for each outcome 70% for each outcome 3. Percentage of project outputs which are reported as achieved or on track TBD TBD TBD 4. Percentage of Country Office annual results reports which meet or exceed expected organizational quality standards (QCPR related indicator) 67% (2012) 70% 90% 5. Percentage of projects meeting or exceeding organizational quality standards (QCPR related indicator) TBD TBD TBD 6. Percentage of new country programme documents that meet organizational standards in the first submission for internal appraisal (QCPR related indicator) 73% (first quarter 2014) TBD TBD 7 Percentage of UNDP staff surveyed who report satisfaction with: UNDP policy services UNDP programme/project guidelines and support TBD TBD TBD 1.2 UNDP’s key development approaches fully integrated into UNDP programmes and projects for more durable results 8. Percentage of projects by type that meet quality standards for capacity development (QCPR related indicator) (2013) 50% of on-going projects recorded in the capacity tracker: - 88% had at least 1 of the 4 envisaged capacity development components - 36% had all 4 components TBD TBD 9. Percentage of expenditures with a significant gender component and with gender as a principal objective. (QCPR related indicator) Number of country offices that and report on expenditures using gender markers validated by a quality assurance process. [COMMON QCPR INDICATOR] (2013) 30% (4% gender projects and 26% projects with a significant gender component) 40% (8% gender projects and 32% projects with a significant gender component) 57% (15% gender projects and 42% projects with a significant gender component) 34 country offices (2013 – 2014) 70
EB%20UNDP%20Integrated%20Results%20and%20Resources%20Framework%202014-17%20-%20June%20Session%20-%2013%20June.docx