Language used for consistency The MDR report indicates that there is – something that not consistent. P2876 L13-14 -- R3: a new proposal for consideration, incorporate the change proposed and remove the text... P3236 L45 question on the quote that is embedded in the MIB. – Discuss the proposal - road section identifier might be needed to “A make an address unique” (this may be a bit different) the text for track changes Review Doc 11-14/922r0 Dorothy STANLEY (Aruba Networks) – CID 3072 (MAC) Review Comment Proposed Resolution: Revised At 721.09 and 721.15, change from “10.8.3” to “10.8.4”. No objection mark ready for motion – CID 3093 (MAC) Review Comment Discussion on the value of “order” Proposed Resolution: Accept No objection mark ready for motion – CID 3096 (GEN) Review comment Proposed resolution: Revised Change from use” to “may “uses” No Objection mark ready for motion – Want to revisit CID 3093 (MAC) The Subelement ID is similar to the Order column, so is this also something that is being used or not Table 8-177 So insert at P892 L11 the optional sub-elements are ordered by “The nondecreasing subelement ID.” Change Proposed Resolution: Revised. Remove the Order column in Table 8-177 and insert the following at 892.11: optional “The are ordered by nondecreasing subelement ID.” More discussion this would be clearer as the order of the subelement – ID. Not unanimous in the discussion Would like to not change the Proposed Resolution as originally proposed. StrawPoll Which choice would you prefer? – Accept - 5 Jounie’s Suggestion (new Resolution) 2 – 19 in the room Decision: Leave it as just Accept Mark Ready for Motion CID 3085 (MAC) Review comment Proposed Resolution: Accept No objection mark ready for motion – CID 3059 (GEN) Review comment Proposed Resolution: Accept No objection mark ready for motion – CID 3312 (GEN) Review Comment Proposed Resolution: Accept
Language used for consistency – The MDR report indicates that there is something that not consistent. P2876 L13-14 -- R3: a new proposal for consideration, incorporate the change proposed and remove the text... P3236 L45 – question on the quote that is embedded in the MIB. Discuss the proposal - “A road section identifier might be needed to make an address unique” (this may be a bit different) the text for track changes Review Doc 11-14/922r0 – Dorothy STANLEY (Aruba Networks) CID 3072 (MAC) Review Comment Proposed Resolution: Revised At 721.09 and 721.15, change from “10.8.3” to “10.8.4”. No objection – mark ready for motion CID 3093 (MAC) Review Comment Discussion on the value of “order” Proposed Resolution: Accept No objection – mark ready for motion CID 3096 (GEN) Review comment Proposed resolution: Revised Change from “may use” to “uses” No Objection – mark ready for motion Want to revisit CID 3093 (MAC) The Subelement ID is similar to the Order column, so is this also something that is being used or not Table 8-177 So insert at P892 L11 the “The optional sub-elements are ordered by nondecreasing subelement ID.” Change Proposed Resolution: Revised. Remove the Order column in Table 8-177 and insert the following at 892.11: “The optional are ordered by nondecreasing subelement ID.” More discussion – this would be clearer as the order of the subelement ID. Not unanimous in the discussion Would like to not change the Proposed Resolution as originally proposed. StrawPoll – Which choice would you prefer? Accept - 5 Jounie’s Suggestion (new Resolution) – 2 19 in the room Decision: Leave it as just Accept Mark Ready for Motion CID 3085 (MAC) Review comment Proposed Resolution: Accept No objection – mark ready for motion CID 3059 (GEN) Review comment Proposed Resolution: Accept No objection – mark ready for motion CID 3312 (GEN) Review Comment Proposed Resolution: Accept
11-14-0845-01-000m-revmc-minutes-for-july-2014-san-diego.docx