even though the outcomes private funding if desired and With a more permissive and might vary possible flexible system it might be Transparency and use of difficult to clearly articulate various mediums one option – being an online assessment tool and criteria so people can understand what eligibility criteria is and then investigate further if they meet it Allow more Change the purchase Potential efficiencies from making Depending on what level of trade-offs framework (purchasing of better decisions and meeting access to EMS items, could Link some services) over time to allow needs more flexibly undermine the EMS equipment for people to make trade-offs Better outcomes for people procurement and prioritisation and and use supports more Quicker access processes modification flexibly Could create a two tiered services Consider how EMS can be system for access to EMS items (EMS) to accessed by NASCs and/or the NASC budget allocators to allow for functions early investment and trade offs for efficiency EMS providers and NASCs, alongside DIAS providers, working together Implement a This could entail reworking Disabled people know that their Stretch on limited resources system for the two NASC contracts with specific disability needs are May not be available in a timely enabling Deaf Aotearoa and The Blind understood as part of the manner NASCs to Foundation to share expert planning process access resources and skill to, enable Could be done remotely specialist them to provide expert advice to all access agencies
even though the outcomes might vary Transparency and use of various mediums – one option being an online assessment tool and criteria so people can understand what eligibility criteria is and then investigate further if they meet it private funding if desired and possible With a more permissive and flexible system it might be difficult to clearly articulate Allow more trade-offs Link some equipment and modification services (EMS) to the NASC functions Change the purchase framework (purchasing of services) over time to allow for people to make trade-offs and use supports more flexibly Consider how EMS can be accessed by NASCs and/or budget allocators to allow for early investment and trade offs for efficiency EMS providers and NASCs, alongside DIAS providers, working together Potential efficiencies from making better decisions and meeting needs more flexibly Better outcomes for people Quicker access Depending on what level of access to EMS items, could undermine the EMS procurement and prioritisation processes Could create a two tiered system for access to EMS items Implement a system for enabling NASCs to access specialist This could entail reworking the two NASC contracts with Deaf Aotearoa and The Blind Foundation to share expert resources and skill to, enable them to provide expert advice to all access agencies Disabled people know that their specific disability needs are understood as part of the planning process Could be done remotely Stretch on limited resources May not be available in a timely manner
dias-nasc-review-proposed-design-framework-jan17.docx