have been included with a much lower bar of quality of evidence. 11357 Alfred 27.9 289.54 It is difficult to As in comment. Revise TGax editor to – understand what values make changes as of the SIG-A related to shown in which of the features. that are Similar for the marked with CID terminologies, in certain 11357, with a note to cases they are not the commenter that consistent. SRP, SR, other changes DSRP, etc. Suggest to presented in revew carefully so that in response there is no to other CIDs provide inconsistencies. Similar additional observation for the improvements in clarity normative behavior. Not and consistency all cases are covered beyond those marked from the AP side and with CID 11357. Any also in some cases from additional changes the STA side. needed to satisfy the commenter would require more specificity accompanying the otherwise rather general comment. I don't see any technical As in comment Reject is no 13009 27.9 289.54 – reason to support two doubt that the SRP SR Lalam versions of the spatial mechanism is effective reuse (OBSS_PD and when an opportunity to SRP), while it is not use it is identified. The even clear if one version SRP mechanism relies A58brings any gain on measured (especially in information which heterogeneous requires additional deployment with legacy complexity within an devices present in the implementation and in network). At least add this case, as if often the some pros and cons for case within 802.11, the each of the two methods choice between and why one should complexity and apply one instead of the performance is left to other. the implementer. A similar argument is made for the OBSS PD SR mechanism, which likely has a simpler implementation, but is also likely to have a less exacting outcome,
have been included with a much lower bar of quality of evidence. 11357 Alfred 27.9 289.54 It is difficult to understand what values of the SIG-A related to which of the features. Similar for the terminologies, in certain cases they are not consistent. SRP, SR, DSRP, etc. Suggest to revew carefully so that there is no inconsistencies. Similar observation for the normative behavior. Not all cases are covered from the AP side and also in some cases from the STA side. As in comment. Revise – TGax editor to make changes as shown in that are marked with CID 11357, with a note to the commenter that other changes presented in in response to other CIDs provide additional improvements in clarity and consistency beyond those marked with CID 11357. Any additional changes needed to satisfy the commenter would require more specificity accompanying the otherwise rather general comment. 13009 Lalam 27.9 289.54 I don't see any technical reason to support two versions of the spatial reuse (OBSS_PD and SRP), while it is not even clear if one version A58brings any gain (especially in heterogeneous deployment with legacy devices present in the network). At least add some pros and cons for each of the two methods and why one should apply one instead of the other. As in comment Reject – is no doubt that the SRP SR mechanism is effective when an opportunity to use it is identified. The SRP mechanism relies on measured information which requires additional complexity within an implementation and in this case, as if often the case within 802.11, the choice between complexity and performance is left to the implementer. A similar argument is made for the OBSS PD SR mechanism, which likely has a simpler implementation, but is also likely to have a less exacting outcome,
11-18-0026-10-00ax-cr-srg-and-srp.docx