IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs MU Comment Resolution, Part 2 Date: 2012-09-19 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email Jindal Broadcom Corp. njindal@broadcom.com CID Page Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6680 Simone 50.50 Background: The VHT Possible solutions in Merlin Compressed Beamforming order of increasing frame includes the VHT complexity: 1) easiest: Compressed Beamforming define the VHT Report (note the capital R) Compressed [field] and the MU Exclusive Beamforming report; Beamforming Report [field]; 1+2) give names that the VHT Compressed are not different only by Beamforming Report (note the capital initial letter the capital R) [field] includes but rather help the poor the VHT Compressed reader. 3) say that the Beamforming Report VHT Compressed information; the MU Exclusive Beamforming frame Beamforming Report includes includes simply a VHT the MU Exclusive Compressed Beamforming Report Beamforming Report information; moreover there is field; the VHT a VHT Compressed Compressed Beamforming report (note the Beamforming Report small r and the absence of a includes the VHT qualifier such as Compressed field/frame/information), Beamforming which is never explicitly Information and the MU defined, but it is used as if it Exclusive Beamforming was a container for the VHT Information (when Compressed Beamforming present). this way there Report information and MU is no need to define VHT Exclusive Beamforming Compressed Report information.--- All of Beamforming report, and this makse logically sense MU Exclusive (except for the missing Beamforming Report explicit definition of the VHT and the fragmetnation Compressed Beamforming can be simply expressed report), but the naming is in terms of the VHT likely to create headaches to Compressed the average reader (including Beamforming Report myself). field.
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs MU Comment Resolution, Part 2 Date: 2012-09-19 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email Jindal Broadcom Corp. njindal@broadcom.com CID Page Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6680 Simone Merlin 50.50 Background: The VHT Compressed Beamforming frame includes the VHT Compressed Beamforming Report (note the capital R) [field] and the MU Exclusive Beamforming Report [field]; the VHT Compressed Beamforming Report (note the capital R) [field] includes the VHT Compressed Beamforming Report information; the MU Exclusive Beamforming Report includes the MU Exclusive Beamforming Report information; moreover there is a VHT Compressed Beamforming report (note the small r and the absence of a qualifier such as field/frame/information), which is never explicitly defined, but it is used as if it was a container for the VHT Compressed Beamforming Report information and MU Exclusive Beamforming Report information.--- All of this makse logically sense (except for the missing explicit definition of the VHT Compressed Beamforming report), but the naming is likely to create headaches to the average reader (including myself). Possible solutions in order of increasing complexity: 1) easiest: define the VHT Compressed Beamforming report; 1+2) give names that are not different only by the capital initial letter but rather help the poor reader. 3) say that the VHT Compressed Beamforming frame includes simply a VHT Compressed Beamforming Report field; the VHT Compressed Beamforming Report includes the VHT Compressed Beamforming Information and the MU Exclusive Beamforming Information (when present). this way there is no need to define VHT Compressed Beamforming report, and MU Exclusive Beamforming Report and the fragmetnation can be simply expressed in terms of the VHT Compressed Beamforming Report field.
11-12-1155-01-00ac-mu-comment-resolution-part-2.docx