CID PP LL Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6187 193 32 The criteria for distinguishing Need to clarify Rejected. among S-MPDU, A-MPDU, and S-MPDU and A-MPDU is defined in IEEE multiple TID A-MPDU is not clear 802.11 2016 specification. Multi-TID A-MPDU enough is defined in 27.10.4. 6183 193 58 As discussed till now, the shorter Please extend the case of a Multi-STA BlockAck frame is Per STA Info subfield desirable. without the Block Ack When a STA receives all of Starting Sequence Control Rejected nonzero length MPDUs with the field and the Block Ack corresponding EOF subfield set to Bitmap field. Discussion: if the other modes of M-BA 0 in a multi-TID A-MPDU, the STA optimization are introduced, the implementation of M-BA becomes more complicated. We believe can acknowledge the reception for opther optimization of M-BA is not needed. the MPDUs using a Multi-STA BlockAck frame without the bitmap for the MPDUs indicating each TID.
CID PP LL Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6187 193 32 The criteria for distinguishing among S-MPDU, A-MPDU, and multiple TID A-MPDU is not clear enough Need to clarify Rejected. S-MPDU and A-MPDU is defined in IEEE 802.11 2016 specification. Multi-TID A-MPDU is defined in 27.10.4. 6183 193 58 As discussed till now, the shorter Multi-STA BlockAck frame is desirable. When a STA receives all of nonzero length MPDUs with the corresponding EOF subfield set to 0 in a multi-TID A-MPDU, the STA can acknowledge the reception for the MPDUs using a Multi-STA BlockAck frame without the bitmap for the MPDUs indicating each TID. Please extend the case of a Per STA Info subfield without the Block Ack Starting Sequence Control field and the Block Ack Bitmap field. Rejected Discussion: if the other modes of M-BA optimization are introduced, the implementation of M-BA becomes more complicated. We believe opther optimization of M-BA is not needed.
11-17-0553-08-00ax-lb225-11ax-d1-0-comment-resolution-27-10-4-part-1.docx