E1 All hazards? Suggest E1 Hazards’ ‘All that the following would be a new hazard descriptors (albeit oft used) be useful to consider: doctrine. Need natural/environmental advice from the hazards; G and Home Affairs technical/technological on how strongly ‘All hazards; behavioural Hazards” should be hazards (would cover referenced. criminal activity and Also, using the term remove the concept of act’ which ‘hostile intent from covers terrorism ‘intentional violence’ for instance). and other violent (Tas) acts that result in an emergency/disaster. E2 Include terrorism E2 See E1 above. (WA) E3 Hazard E3 Noted. If the descriptor/s be Handbook went better defined, or a down this path it conversation would be a doctrinal commenced at least change and would about contemporary need endorsement or appropriate hazard by jurisdictions and descriptors. In the ANZEMC. (current) review of the Tasmanian EM arrangements, we will likely use the following hazard descriptors: hazards;
E1 All hazards? Suggest that the following hazard descriptors be useful to consider: natural/environmental hazards; technical/technological hazards; behavioural hazards (would cover criminal activity and remove the concept of intent from ‘intentional violence’ for instance). (Tas) E1 ‘All Hazards’ would be a new (albeit oft used) doctrine. Need advice from the and Home Affairs on how strongly ‘All Hazards” should be referenced. Also, using the term ‘hostile act’ which covers terrorism and other violent acts that result in an emergency/disaster. E2 Include terrorism (WA) E2 See E1 above. E3 Hazard descriptor/s be better defined, or a conversation commenced at least about contemporary or appropriate hazard descriptors. In the (current) review of the Tasmanian EM arrangements, we will likely use the following hazard descriptors: hazards; E3 Noted. If the Handbook went down this path it would be a doctrinal change and would need endorsement by jurisdictions and ANZEMC. G
E-M%20Handbook%20WG%20Feedback%20Summary%2020180724.docx