TGac Editor, cahneg the following defenition in Clause 3.1: aggregate medium access control (MAC) protocol data unit (A-MPDU) subframe: A portion of an AMPDU containing a delimiter and optionally containing an associated MPDU. 10144 Adachi, 3.1 The definition of an MU PPDU allows a Change the definition Reject. While it is more Tomoko 2.32 single STA to be the receiver. But reading to have consistency efficient to send multiple the definition of MU-MIMO, which is a with the definition of PSDUs in a MU-PPDU, it is larger concept, it seems to be restricted for MU-MIMO. possible to send a single multiple STAs, more than one. The Reexamine if it is PSDU to a single receipient definition of DL-MU-MIMO can be also allowed to carry a by approperiatelly setting the read to be restricted for multiple STAs, same PSDU to GID and NSTS in not for a single STA. multiple STAs and It is also possible to send Furthermore, is it allowed to carry a same clarify the definition the same PSDU to multiple (single) PSDU to multiple STAs? If so, from a group RA case STAs by approperiatelly the case should be differentiated with the if necessary. setting the subfields in case using a PSDU using a group address This case is not for the RA. different with the MU-MIMO operation explained in the spec except that the content of individual PSDUs are the same, and it seems there is no distingution is left to be added. Hence, it is left to implementtaion to decide on the most efficient way to send the same PSDU to multiple STAs.
TGac Editor, cahneg the following defenition in Clause 3.1: aggregate medium access control (MAC) protocol data unit (A-MPDU) subframe: A portion of an AMPDU containing a delimiter and optionally containing an associated MPDU. 10144 Adachi, Tomoko 3.1 2.32 The definition of an MU PPDU allows a single STA to be the receiver. But reading the definition of MU-MIMO, which is a larger concept, it seems to be restricted for multiple STAs, more than one. The definition of DL-MU-MIMO can be also read to be restricted for multiple STAs, not for a single STA. Furthermore, is it allowed to carry a same (single) PSDU to multiple STAs? If so, the case should be differentiated with the case using a PSDU using a group address for the RA. Change the definition to have consistency with the definition of MU-MIMO. Reexamine if it is allowed to carry a same PSDU to multiple STAs and clarify the definition from a group RA case if necessary. Reject. While it is more efficient to send multiple PSDUs in a MU-PPDU, it is possible to send a single PSDU to a single receipient by approperiatelly setting the GID and NSTS in It is also possible to send the same PSDU to multiple STAs by approperiatelly setting the subfields in This case is not different with the MU-MIMO operation explained in the spec except that the content of individual PSDUs are the same, and it seems there is no distingution is left to be added. Hence, it is left to implementtaion to decide on the most efficient way to send the same PSDU to multiple STAs.
11-13-0731-00-00ac-sb0-general-clause-3-cids.docx