Spain - CECOP SOS Rioja No Spain–P.Asturias - 112 Asturias What is the difference (see 7.1) Sweden - SOS Sverige AB Yes. It should be a database exclusively for official PSAPs (see answer on question 6, “Other cases” NOTE ON QUESTION 7: For the purposed of designing the database it is important to understand if the database should contain a primary PSAP in each country or information on all PSAPs. The current EENA solution contains only a primary PSAP in each country. It is a matter for the PSAPs to advise on the most effective solution to meet their inter-PSAP communications needs. PT ES recognises the operational challenges that might be involved with having too many entries for each country in the database. This is related to the determination of the correct PSAP which has to be done in the destination country and by its rules. PT ES is seeking feedback in response to Question 8 on how best to address those challenges. 8 The PT ES recognises that the organisation of emergency services is of the exclusive national competence of each CEPT Member and it has no intention to interfere with PSAP operations in any way. Do you think that the ECC, by hosting such a database, interferes in a negative way with the operation of the emergency services in your country? Country Yes No Austria - Ministry of the Interior No Belgium - Federal Public No Service Interiors–Direction 112 Bulgaria - MoI, Directorate No National 112 System Croatia - National Protection No and Rescue Directorate Czech Republic - General No Directorate of Fire and Rescue Service Denmark - Danish National Yes police, Center for emergency communication Copenhagen Fire Brigade Estonia - Estonian Emergency No Response Centre Finland - Emergency Response No Centre Administration Greece - General Secretariat for No Civil Protection (GSCP) Iceland - Neyðarlínan ohf. 112 No. That is probably the only way to get all states to comply. Ireland - ECAS No Latvia - State Fire and Rescue No Service Lithuania - Emergency No. This doesn't interfere with our Response Centre operations as ECC wouldn’t perform any PSAP operation by only maintaining a database of PSAP telephone numbers Luxembourg National Rescue No – Agency Malta - Ministry for Home Affairs No and National Security N/A The Netherlands - National No. The PT ES provides a tool for Police effective transnational communication, free to use. Each member state has to implement relevant legislation on the
Spain - CECOP SOS Rioja No Spain–P.Asturias - 112 Asturias What is the difference (see 7.1) Sweden - SOS Sverige AB Yes. It should be a database exclusively for official PSAPs (see answer on question 6, “Other cases” NOTE ON QUESTION 7: For the purposed of designing the database it is important to understand if the database should contain a primary PSAP in each country or information on all PSAPs. The current EENA solution contains only a primary PSAP in each country. It is a matter for the PSAPs to advise on the most effective solution to meet their inter-PSAP communications needs. PT ES recognises the operational challenges that might be involved with having too many entries for each country in the database. This is related to the determination of the correct PSAP which has to be done in the destination country and by its rules. PT ES is seeking feedback in response to Question 8 on how best to address those challenges. 8 The PT ES recognises that the organisation of emergency services is of the exclusive national competence of each CEPT Member and it has no intention to interfere with PSAP operations in any way. Do you think that the ECC, by hosting such a database, interferes in a negative way with the operation of the emergency services in your country? Country Yes No Austria - Ministry of the Interior No Belgium - Federal Public Service Interiors–Direction 112 No Bulgaria - MoI, Directorate National 112 System No Croatia - National Protection and Rescue Directorate No Czech Republic - General Directorate of Fire and Rescue Service No Denmark - Danish National police, Center for emergency communication Copenhagen Fire Brigade Yes Estonia - Estonian Emergency Response Centre No Finland - Emergency Response Centre Administration No Greece - General Secretariat for Civil Protection (GSCP) No Iceland - Neyðarlínan ohf. 112 No. That is probably the only way to get all states to comply. Ireland - ECAS No Latvia - State Fire and Rescue Service No Lithuania - Emergency Response Centre No. This doesn't interfere with our operations as ECC wouldn’t perform any PSAP operation by only maintaining a database of PSAP telephone numbers Luxembourg – National Rescue Agency No Malta - Ministry for Home Affairs and National Security No N/A The Netherlands - National Police No. The PT ES provides a tool for effective transnational communication, free to use. Each member state has to implement relevant legislation on the
Draft%20ECC%20Report%20264%20-%20Annex%202.docx