IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs 11ba D1.1 MAC Comment Resolution for WUR Duty Cycle Part I Date: 2018-11-11 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email Intel 2200 Mission College Blvd, Po-Kai Huang po-kai.huang@intel.com Corporation Santa Clara, CA 950542200 Interpretation of a Motion to Adopt A motion to approve this submission means that the editing instructions and any changed or added material are actioned in the TGba D1.1 Draft. This introduction is not part of the adopted material. Editing instructions formatted like this are intended to be copied into the TGba D1.1 Draft (i.e. they are instructions to the 802.11 editor on how to merge the text with the baseline documents). TGba Editor: Editing instructions preceded by Editor” are instructions to the TGba editor to “TGba modify existing material in the TGba As a result of adopting the changes, the TGba editor will execute the instructions rather than copy them to the TGba Draft. CID P.L Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 308 Hanseul 30.07 9.4.2.273 The duty cycle period is only Include the Duty Rejected – Hong included in the WUR mode element Period in the sent by STA. For duty cycle WUR Parameters Current spec already provides a scheduling and transmission of field from WUR AP mechnaims for AP to regulate the duty broadcast WUR Wake-up frame, AP cycle and enable transmission of should be able to indicate the broadcast WUR Wake-up frame. preferred duty cycle period Specifically, AP can deicde the duty cycle period unit and the starting time of the duty cycle. If AP decides the Duty cycle period, it may not match the delay requirement of the non-STA. 792 Osama 52.17 31.5 What is the impact of the WUR duty as in comment Rejected – cycle on the delay experienced by frames destined to a WUR non-AP The commenter does not provide any STA in the off-duration? Some suggested the resolution for the discussion is needed. comment.
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs 11ba D1.1 MAC Comment Resolution for WUR Duty Cycle Part I Date: 2018-11-11 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email Po-Kai Huang Intel Corporation 2200 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, CA 950542200 po-kai.huang@intel.com Interpretation of a Motion to Adopt A motion to approve this submission means that the editing instructions and any changed or added material are actioned in the TGba D1.1 Draft. This introduction is not part of the adopted material. Editing instructions formatted like this are intended to be copied into the TGba D1.1 Draft (i.e. they are instructions to the 802.11 editor on how to merge the text with the baseline documents). TGba Editor: Editing instructions preceded by “TGba Editor” are instructions to the TGba editor to modify existing material in the TGba As a result of adopting the changes, the TGba editor will execute the instructions rather than copy them to the TGba Draft. CID P.L Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 308 Hanseul Hong 30.07 9.4.2.273 The duty cycle period is only included in the WUR mode element sent by STA. For duty cycle scheduling and transmission of broadcast WUR Wake-up frame, AP should be able to indicate the preferred duty cycle period Include the Duty Period in the WUR Parameters field from WUR AP Rejected – Current spec already provides a mechnaims for AP to regulate the duty cycle and enable transmission of broadcast WUR Wake-up frame. Specifically, AP can deicde the duty cycle period unit and the starting time of the duty cycle. If AP decides the Duty cycle period, it may not match the delay requirement of the non-STA. 792 Osama 52.17 31.5 What is the impact of the WUR duty cycle on the delay experienced by frames destined to a WUR non-AP STA in the off-duration? Some discussion is needed. as in comment Rejected – The commenter does not provide any suggested the resolution for the comment.
11-18-1937-01-00ba-cr-for-wur-duty-cycle-part-i.docx