according SIFS, the AP will not to the procedure announce fragment BA defined in 9.3.2.10a support. (Fragment BA procedure)." Interpreting what a frame means according to the capbilities of both transmitter and receiver is generally a bad idea. It requires the a STA to determine its peer's capabilities before knowing how to respond or interpret a frame. And that might be in a SIFS period. It also makes it difficult for a 3rd party - e.g. a sniffer, to follow the exchange or report it meaningfully. 76 11 I agree that "An S1G Replace it with " The Accept STA always set the S1G subfield is set to 1 S1G subfield to 1". by an S1G STA and is But what about a set to 0 by a non-S1G non-S1G STA? STA". 76 3 Table 8-9 seems to Move the table to its Revise be out of place. It proper clause belongs to QoS Discussion: Table 8-9 is Control field already moved to the place under subclause 8.2.4.5.4. 76 45 what is the purpose keep the reserved bit Revise 5 of setting the reserved bit always to Discussion: It is set to 1 1? Why waste a bit only by S1G STA. A non for something that S1G STA will set the seems to serve no subfield to 0. purpose. See comment resolution for comment 3236. 8.2.4.5.4 Ack Policy subfield Table 8-9 TGah editor: Change as follows(CID 3000): Ack Policy subfield in QoS Control field of QoS Data frames
according to the procedure defined in 9.3.2.10a (Fragment BA procedure)." Interpreting what a frame means according to the capbilities of both transmitter and receiver is generally a bad idea. It requires the a STA to determine its peer's capabilities before knowing how to respond or interpret a frame. And that might be in a SIFS period. It also makes it difficult for a 3rd party - e.g. a sniffer, to follow the exchange or report it meaningfully. SIFS, the AP will not announce fragment BA support. 76 11 I agree that "An S1G STA always set the S1G subfield to 1". But what about a non-S1G STA? Replace it with " The S1G subfield is set to 1 by an S1G STA and is set to 0 by a non-S1G STA". Accept 76 3 Table 8-9 seems to be out of place. It belongs to QoS Control field Move the table to its proper clause Revise Discussion: Table 8-9 is already moved to the place under subclause 8.2.4.5.4. 76 45 what is the purpose of setting the reserved bit always to 1? Why waste a bit for something that seems to serve no purpose. keep the reserved bit Revise Discussion: It is set to 1 only by S1G STA. A non S1G STA will set the subfield to 0. See comment resolution for comment 3236. 8.2.4.5.4 Ack Policy subfield TGah editor: Change Table 8-9 as follows(CID 3000): Ack Policy subfield in QoS Control field of QoS Data frames 5
11-14-1252-02-00ah-lb203-comment-resolution-for-8-2-3-8-2-4.docx