section 19(5) of the Public Interest Monitor Act 2011; has the same meaning as it relevant application has in section 4 of the Public Interest Monitor Act 2011. S. 14 inserted by No. 19/2012 s. 8. 14 Public Interest Monitor to give information and access despite other laws (1) Despite any other law, a Public Interest Monitor is not excused from giving information, answering a question, or giving access to a document, as and when required by or under section 13, on the ground that giving the information, answering the question, or giving access to the document, as the case may be, would contravene a law, would be contrary to the public interest or might tend to incriminate the person or make the person liable to a penalty but— information, the answer, or the fact that the person has so given access to the document, as the case may be; and information or thing (including a document) obtained as a direct consequence of giving the first-mentioned information, answering the question or giving access to the first-mentioned document, as the case may be— is not admissible in evidence against the person except in proceedings for an offence under this Act.
section 19(5) of the Public Interest Monitor Act 2011; relevant application has the same meaning as it has in section 4 of the Public Interest Monitor Act 2011. S. 14 inserted by No. 19/2012 s. 8. 14 Public Interest Monitor to give information and access despite other laws (1) Despite any other law, a Public Interest Monitor is not excused from giving information, answering a question, or giving access to a document, as and when required by or under section 13, on the ground that giving the information, answering the question, or giving access to the document, as the case may be, would contravene a law, would be contrary to the public interest or might tend to incriminate the person or make the person liable to a penalty but— information, the answer, or the fact that the person has so given access to the document, as the case may be; and information or thing (including a document) obtained as a direct consequence of giving the first-mentioned information, answering the question or giving access to the first-mentioned document, as the case may be— is not admissible in evidence against the person except in proceedings for an offence under this Act.
11-70a018.docx