7600 Liwen 72.53 Add the following As in comment Reject is no – Chu restriction "The AP discernible doesn't transmit a TIM justifcation for the frame or a FILS proposed change. discovery frame including a TIM element at the beginning of the TWT SP." 7922 Mark 69.63 "The Wake TBTT Add similar Revise –generally RISON Negotiation subfield sentences to the agree with indicates" -- how "The Broadcast comment - TGax exactly does it indicate field is 1 to indicate editor shall make this? that the TWT SP(s) the changes shown defined by the TWT in 11-17/0777r8 element are that are marked associated with with CID 7922. broadcast TWT(s). The Broadcast field is 0, otherwise." above 7923 Mark 72.37 " the TWT Flow Delete "scheduled" Revise –generally Identifier subfield agree with contains a value that comment - TGax indicates editor shall make recommendations on the changes shown the types of in 11-17/0777r8 frames that are that are marked transmitted by with CID 7923. scheduled STAs during the broadcast TWT SP, encoded according to Table 262k1" -- but that table discusses both the scheduling STA and scheduled STA 7924 Mark 70.27 "Description when Change "1" to "0" Revise deleting – transmitted by a the earlier sentence TWT scheduling is logically STA, Wake TBTT equivalent, simpler Negotiation and easier to subfield = 1" is understand, as the incompatible with " fields have the The same meaning Wake TBTT when the Wake Negotiation subfield is TBTT Negotiation set to in TWT bit is set to 1, elements transmitted regardless of by a responding STA whether requesting, and by a responding, scheduling STA." at scheduled or line 2 scheduling STA sets the bit. TGax editor make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r8 that are marked with CID 7924.
7600 Liwen Chu 72.53 Add the following restriction "The AP doesn't transmit a TIM frame or a FILS discovery frame including a TIM element at the beginning of the TWT SP." As in comment Reject – is no discernible justifcation for the proposed change. 7922 Mark RISON 69.63 "The Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield indicates" -- how exactly does it indicate this? Add similar sentences to the "The Broadcast field is 1 to indicate that the TWT SP(s) defined by the TWT element are associated with broadcast TWT(s). The Broadcast field is 0, otherwise." above Revise –generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r8 that are marked with CID 7922. 7923 Mark 72.37 " the TWT Flow Identifier subfield contains a value that indicates recommendations on the types of frames that are transmitted by scheduled STAs during the broadcast TWT SP, encoded according to Table 262k1" -- but that table discusses both the scheduling STA and scheduled STA Delete "scheduled" Revise –generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r8 that are marked with CID 7923. 7924 Mark 70.27 "Description when transmitted by a TWT scheduling STA, Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield = 1" is incompatible with " The Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield is set to in TWT elements transmitted by a responding STA and by a scheduling STA." at line 2 Change "1" to "0" Revise – deleting the earlier sentence is logically equivalent, simpler and easier to understand, as the fields have the same meaning when the Wake TBTT Negotiation bit is set to 1, regardless of whether requesting, responding, scheduled or scheduling STA sets the bit. TGax editor make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r8 that are marked with CID 7924.
11-17-0777-08-00ax-cr-twt-ie.docx