CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6329 180.26 22.1.1 The definitions of SU PPDU and MU Add the definitions of Rejected. The definition of PPDU are ambiguous. From the NOTE SU PPDU and PPDU” exists in clause “SU on P180L26, it is seemed that SU replace MU PPDU 3.1 and an MU PPDU in the PPDUs is one of the following PPDUs: with VHT MU PPDU future may not be a VHT - VHT SU PPDU throughout the Draft. MU PPDU. - Non-HT PPDU - Non-HT duplicate PPDU On the other hands, it is seemed that MU PPDU is equivalent to VHT MU PPDU. Discussion: The comment is correct that a SU PPDU could be a VHT SU PPDU, a Non-HT PPDU or a Non-HT duplicated PPDU. The conception of PPDU” is clearly defined as in Ln32/Pg2 in 11ac spec draft D3.0. And the note “SU here is helping to clarify that PPDU” doesn’t mean a PPDU transmitted to a single user. “SU CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6504 182.23 22.1.4 What's an independent PSDU? Delete "independent" Please TGac Editor to modify the D3.0 text as the commenter proposed.
CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6329 180.26 22.1.1 The definitions of SU PPDU and MU PPDU are ambiguous. From the NOTE on P180L26, it is seemed that SU PPDUs is one of the following PPDUs: - VHT SU PPDU - Non-HT PPDU - Non-HT duplicate PPDU On the other hands, it is seemed that MU PPDU is equivalent to VHT MU PPDU. Add the definitions of SU PPDU and replace MU PPDU with VHT MU PPDU throughout the Draft. Rejected. The definition of “SU PPDU” exists in clause 3.1 and an MU PPDU in the future may not be a VHT MU PPDU. Discussion: The comment is correct that a SU PPDU could be a VHT SU PPDU, a Non-HT PPDU or a Non-HT duplicated PPDU. The conception of “SU PPDU” is clearly defined as in Ln32/Pg2 in 11ac spec draft D3.0. And the note here is helping to clarify that “SU PPDU” doesn’t mean a PPDU transmitted to a single user. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6504 182.23 22.1.4 What's an independent PSDU? Delete "independent" Please TGac Editor to modify the D3.0 text as the commenter proposed.
11-12-1055-01-00ac-lb188-comments-resolution-clause-22-1.docx