STA will use this element, so it will be better to use "an IDO STA in an IBSS". 488 32.00 8.4.2.af3 The way different possible Suggest to simplify the text by only modes are defined for CPM covering channel switch and changes in looks very complex. The main maximum transmit power levels. May be functions are to indicate a bit map representation for various required channel switch, and/or options would be the better approach. power changes. Too many options embedded in each mode are confusing. For example, why the stopping transmissions immediately or not requires to be indicated in two modes. This may be signaled by channel power switch count field as well. 743 32.01 8.4.2.af3 Table 8-42paf1—Channel Assign bits in Channel Power Power Management Mode Management Mode value to reflect what values all fields are present and possible action It might help to instead have a corresponding to each bit. bit field indicating which fields are actually present and possible action, instead of having enumerated values 963 32.01 8.4.2.af3 Table 8-42paf1—Channel Assign bits in Channel Power Power Management Mode Management Mode value to reflect what values all fields are present and possible action It might help to instead have a corresponding to each bit. bit field indicating which fields are actually present and possible action, instead of having enumerated values 280 32.43 8.4.2.af3 "requested"? Then is not Change "requested" to "required" - make much of a point. Either you appropriate, corresponding changes require or your don't. elsewhere where behavioral description of this interaciton exists. 388 33.22 8.4.2.af3 I don't understand the following Clarify sentence "Stopping transmissions until the actual change(s) in the Constrained Maximum Transmit Power(s) is requested." Who requests what? Who should do what? The sentence occurs also in slighty different form as "Stopping transmissions until the actual channel switch(es) is requested." 489 32.45 8.4.2.af3 Is the indication of primary and Clarify. secondary channels in mode 4 or 5 is meant for .11n 40 MHz bandwidth? In the current channelization plan for TVWS band in E.1 does not have primary and secondary channels.
STA will use this element, so it will be better to use "an IDO STA in an IBSS". 488 32.00 8.4.2.af3 The way different possible modes are defined for CPM looks very complex. The main functions are to indicate required channel switch, and/or power changes. Too many options embedded in each mode are confusing. For example, why the stopping transmissions immediately or not requires to be indicated in two modes. This may be signaled by channel power switch count field as well. Suggest to simplify the text by only covering channel switch and changes in maximum transmit power levels. May be a bit map representation for various options would be the better approach. 743 32.01 8.4.2.af3 Table 8-42paf1—Channel Power Management Mode values It might help to instead have a bit field indicating which fields are actually present and possible action, instead of having enumerated values Assign bits in Channel Power Management Mode value to reflect what all fields are present and possible action corresponding to each bit. 963 32.01 8.4.2.af3 Table 8-42paf1—Channel Power Management Mode values It might help to instead have a bit field indicating which fields are actually present and possible action, instead of having enumerated values Assign bits in Channel Power Management Mode value to reflect what all fields are present and possible action corresponding to each bit. 280 32.43 8.4.2.af3 "requested"? Then is not much of a point. Either you require or your don't. Change "requested" to "required" - make appropriate, corresponding changes elsewhere where behavioral description of this interaciton exists. 388 33.22 8.4.2.af3 I don't understand the following sentence "Stopping transmissions until the actual change(s) in the Constrained Maximum Transmit Power(s) is requested." Who requests what? Who should do what? The sentence occurs also in slighty different form as "Stopping transmissions until the actual channel switch(es) is requested." Clarify 489 32.45 8.4.2.af3 Is the indication of primary and secondary channels in mode 4 or 5 is meant for .11n 40 MHz bandwidth? In the current channelization plan for TVWS band in E.1 does not have primary and secondary channels. Clarify.
11-11-1102-00-00af-proposed-resolution-to-cpm-element.docx