frame contains one or more random RU(s)." 4797 Alfred This sentence is not As in Revised- Asterjadhi clear "An AP shall not comment transmit to a STA an in principle.DL HE MU PPDU with MIMO is not supported with the HE-SIG-B DL OFDMA unless the STA allocating spatial claims it is capable of doing it. streams to more The first part of sentence may than one recipient describe the case of full STA, unless the STA bandwidth DL MU MIMO sets the Downlink operation. The last paragraph MU-MIMO On Partial of this section already Bandwidth Rx conveyed the intended subfield of information. Prpose to delete the HE Capabilities this sentence. element to 1.". Please clarify what TGax editor makes changes the intention is. as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 4797. 4798 Alfred It is not the As in Accepted- Asterjadhi transmission that is commnet. padded but the TGax editor makes changes PSDU in each RU. as shown in 11-17/1286r0 PLease rephrase. that are marked with CID 4798 4799 Alfred Unicast is not As in Revised- Asterjadhi 56 defined. Define it comment. prior to its use. Agree in principle. In the baseline spec, unicast address is defined. Propose to change to set to “RA unicast address”. TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 4799. 4801 Alfred This is not enough. It As in Revised- Asterjadhi has to be clear what comment. the MPDU that is sent The sentence is confusing. A in the broadcast RU broadcast RU is not part of a contains. E.g., can it HE MU PPDU. We propose be a broadcast to improve the clarity of the MPDU that was sent sentence. An legacy PPDU in legacy PPDU? If will not be able to use an yes then what is the broadcast RU unless the STA receiving both broadcast RU is taking the full expected to do? bandwidth of the PPDU. In such case, it falls back to the
frame contains one or more random RU(s)." 4797 Alfred Asterjadhi This sentence is not clear "An AP shall not transmit to a STA an HE MU PPDU with the HE-SIG-B allocating spatial streams to more than one recipient STA, unless the STA sets the Downlink MU-MIMO On Partial Bandwidth Rx subfield of the HE Capabilities element to 1.". Please clarify what the intention is. As in comment Revised- in principle.DL is not supported with DL OFDMA unless the STA claims it is capable of doing it. The first part of sentence may describe the case of full bandwidth DL MU MIMO operation. The last paragraph of this section already conveyed the intended information. Prpose to delete this sentence. TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 4797. 4798 Alfred Asterjadhi It is not the transmission that is padded but the PSDU in each RU. PLease rephrase. As in commnet. Accepted- TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 4798 4799 Alfred Asterjadhi Unicast is not defined. Define it prior to its use. As in comment. Revised- Agree in principle. In the baseline spec, unicast address is defined. Propose to change to “RA set to unicast address”. TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 4799. 4801 Alfred Asterjadhi This is not enough. It has to be clear what the MPDU that is sent in the broadcast RU contains. E.g., can it be a broadcast MPDU that was sent in legacy PPDU? If yes then what is the STA receiving both expected to do? As in comment. Revised- The sentence is confusing. A broadcast RU is not part of a HE MU PPDU. We propose to improve the clarity of the sentence. An legacy PPDU will not be able to use an broadcast RU unless the broadcast RU is taking the full bandwidth of the PPDU. In such case, it falls back to the MIMO 56
11-17-1286-00-00ax-cr-dl-mu-procedure.docx