the meaning of specified in See resolution to the field "Configuration .. comment. CID 2001. User .. SISO ID" is somewhat misleading. TGay editor to make The RX AWVs cannot be the changes shown known by the initiator, in 11-18/0610r0 since multiple RX AWVs under all headings can be tested for one id. that include CID They can only be inferred 2020. by responder, based on the SISO id. 2239 78 1 A STA can be excluded Change field name Revised- from MIMO training and to Configureation x feedback phases of User y SISO ID Agreed in principle. BF training. In this Subset Index for case the excluded STA antenna z / RX TGay editor to make does not have a SISO ID antenna ID the changes in subset index, but still 11-18/0610r0 under needs to be signaled in the add description in all headings that MIMO selection frame to 10.38.9.2.3.3 for include CID 2239. know which RX antenna STAs excluded should be activated from MU-MIMO BF training and Feddback phases in the procedure of MIMO selection 1342 171 19 The connection between Define an Rejected- the MU-MIMO assignement of configuration and spatial streams to users in Assignment of streams that can be each configuration spatial streams to assigned to users in (e.g.) users is signalled in 30.4.10.5 is extremely the opaque. There is a need field of EDMG to define which user gets MU PPDU. It is not which streams necessary to assign spatial streams to users in MU-MIMO transmission configuration. Proposed changes to D1.1 and 18/0299r1: Modify the change on 15 as follows (CID 1976, 2001, 2020, 2239): Size Field Meaning (bits) Element ID 8 …. MU-MIMO Configuration 32 Indicates the STA(s) in the target MU group associated with the Transmission 1 Group User first TX DMG antenna in the first MU-MIMO transmission Mask for configuration. Antenna 1
the meaning of the field "Configuration .. User .. SISO ID" is somewhat misleading. The RX AWVs cannot be known by the initiator, since multiple RX AWVs can be tested for one id. They can only be inferred by responder, based on the SISO id. specified in comment. See resolution to CID 2001. TGay editor to make the changes shown in 11-18/0610r0 under all headings that include CID 2020. 2239 78 1 A STA can be excluded from MIMO training and feedback phases of BF training. In this case the excluded STA does not have a SISO ID subset index, but still needs to be signaled in the MIMO selection frame to know which RX antenna should be activated Change field name to Configureation x User y SISO ID Subset Index for antenna z / RX antenna ID add description in 10.38.9.2.3.3 for STAs excluded from MU-MIMO BF training and Feddback phases in the procedure of MIMO selection Revised- Agreed in principle. TGay editor to make the changes in 11-18/0610r0 under all headings that include CID 2239. 1342 171 19 The connection between the MU-MIMO configuration and spatial streams that can be assigned to users in (e.g.) 30.4.10.5 is extremely opaque. There is a need to define which user gets which streams Define an assignement of streams to users in each configuration Rejected- Assignment of spatial streams to users is signalled in the field of EDMG MU PPDU. It is not necessary to assign spatial streams to users in MU-MIMO transmission configuration. Proposed changes to D1.1 and 18/0299r1: Modify the change on 15 as follows (CID 1976, 2001, 2020, 2239): Field Size (bits) Meaning Element ID 8 …. MU-MIMO Transmission Configuration 1 Group User Mask for Antenna 1 32 Indicates the STA(s) in the target MU group associated with the first TX DMG antenna in the first MU-MIMO transmission configuration.
11-18-0610-00-00ay-cr-on-mimo-bf-misc.docx