CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Owning Ad-hoc 10.2.2.17 What is the value of the "Overridden" status Add a NOTE to say MAC code in the TIM Broadcast Response this is treated exactly element? the same as Accept by the recipient, e.g. "NOTE---A Status field indicating Overridden can be treated exactly the same as one indicating Accept." Discussion Cited text at 1569.57: The the value of the is defined in Table 8-200: “Overriden” The behaviour of the STA receiving is different from the behaviour of receiving “Overridden” “Accept”. According to 1570.1: However, when the STA receives it cannot ignore the TIM Broadcast Interval. The TIM “Overridden”, Broadcast Interval specified in the TIM Broadcast Resposne element be used by the STA. Proposed resolution: Rejected. The behaviour of the STA receiving might be different from the behaviour of the STA “Overridden” receiving see 1570.1 “Accept”, CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Owning Ad-hoc 10.2 "A STA that has transmitted a frame to an AP Add similar statements MAC with which it is not associated and from which it for IBSS, PBSS and expects a response shall remain in the awake perhaps also MBSS state until such a response is received or until the procedure has timed out." -- equivalent statements need to be made for cases Discussion In IBSS, there is no concept. Therefore, similar statement won’t apply. The basic approach “associated” of power management in IBSS is described in 10.2.3. There is no need to add a similar sentence for IBSS. For MBSS, s similar description is already covered in 13.14.8.3 Operation in deep sleep mode for nonpeer mesh STAs:
CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Owning Ad-hoc 10.2.2.17 What is the value of the "Overridden" status code in the TIM Broadcast Response element? Add a NOTE to say this is treated exactly the same as Accept by the recipient, e.g. "NOTE---A Status field indicating Overridden can be treated exactly the same as one indicating Accept." MAC Discussion Cited text at 1569.57: The the value of the “Overriden” is defined in Table 8-200: The behaviour of the STA receiving “Overridden” is different from the behaviour of receiving “Accept”. According to 1570.1: However, when the STA receives “Overridden”, it cannot ignore the TIM Broadcast Interval. The TIM Broadcast Interval specified in the TIM Broadcast Resposne element be used by the STA. Proposed resolution: Rejected. The behaviour of the STA receiving “Overridden” might be different from the behaviour of the STA receiving “Accept”, see 1570.1 CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Owning Ad-hoc 10.2 "A STA that has transmitted a frame to an AP with which it is not associated and from which it expects a response shall remain in the awake state until such a response is received or until the procedure has timed out." -- equivalent statements need to be made for cases Add similar statements for IBSS, PBSS and perhaps also MBSS MAC Discussion In IBSS, there is no “associated” concept. Therefore, similar statement won’t apply. The basic approach of power management in IBSS is described in 10.2.3. There is no need to add a similar sentence for IBSS. For MBSS, s similar description is already covered in 13.14.8.3 Operation in deep sleep mode for nonpeer mesh STAs:
11-15-1180-08-000m-sb0-resolutions-for-ps-comments.docx