Date: Report Name (pseudo name of child): Faculty Reviewing Report: Graduate Student Writing Report: RATING SCALE: 1= Needs Development: Competency not yet demonstrated. Minimal detail and information included. Explanation is unclear or incorrect. Conclusions based on limited information. Tone and presentation does not demonstrate professionalism and sensitivity to diversity and/or unique situations. Writing skills do not reflect graduate level proficiencies. 2= Effective: Sufficient of competency demonstrated. Skills reflect what is necessary for an entry-level school psychologist. Sufficient detail and information included. Explanation is clear and accurate. Conclusions are based on sufficient information and reflect an adequate synthesis of background information and important assessment results. Tone and presentation demonstrate professional attitudes and sensitivity to diversity and/or unique situations. Writing skills reflect graduate level proficiencies. 3= Very Effective: Competency exceeds expectation for an school psychologist. Information and history provided a thorough and concise review. Explanations are succinct, clear, and accurate. Conclusions reflect excellent synthesis and integration of background and assessment results. Professional demeanor and sensitivity to diversity and/or unique situations are demonstrated throughout the report. Writing skills demonstrate excellence throughout. Information is understandable to teachers and parents. STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION 1- Development 2- Effective 3- Very Effective Report Section SCORE COMMENTS Report written in this sequence: Identifying Information Reason for Referral Assessment Procedures (e.g. list of tests) Review of Records Interviews Observations Test Results Summary Recommendations Signatures Data Summary Handout for parent/teacher (optional) OVERALL SCORE: OVERALL COMMENTS: Identifying Information 1- Needs Development 2- Effective 3- Very Effective Score Comments States name, date of birth, current grade and school Includes results and dates of vision/hearing screenings Indicates names were changes to ensure confidentiality Includes the of parents or teaches as appropriate Other OVERALL SCORE: OVERALL COMMENTS: REASON FOR REFERRAL 1- Needs Development 2- Effective 3- Very Effective SCORE COMMENTS States purpose of referral States who (name and position) initiated the referral Describes referral concerns in observable and measurable
Date: Report Name (pseudo name of child): Faculty Reviewing Report: Graduate Student Writing Report: RATING SCALE: 1= Needs Development: Competency not yet demonstrated. Minimal detail and information included. Explanation is unclear or incorrect. Conclusions based on limited information. Tone and presentation does not demonstrate professionalism and sensitivity to diversity and/or unique situations. Writing skills do not reflect graduate level proficiencies. 2= Effective: Sufficient of competency demonstrated. Skills reflect what is necessary for an entry-level school psychologist. Sufficient detail and information included. Explanation is clear and accurate. Conclusions are based on sufficient information and reflect an adequate synthesis of background information and important assessment results. Tone and presentation demonstrate professional attitudes and sensitivity to diversity and/or unique situations. Writing skills reflect graduate level proficiencies. 3= Very Effective: Competency exceeds expectation for an school psychologist. Information and history provided a thorough and concise review. Explanations are succinct, clear, and accurate. Conclusions reflect excellent synthesis and integration of background and assessment results. Professional demeanor and sensitivity to diversity and/or unique situations are demonstrated throughout the report. Writing skills demonstrate excellence throughout. Information is understandable to teachers and parents. STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION 1- Development 2- Effective 3- Very Effective Report Section SCORE COMMENTS Report written in this sequence: Identifying Information Reason for Referral Assessment Procedures (e.g. list of tests) Review of Records Interviews Observations Test Results Summary Recommendations Signatures Data Summary Handout for parent/teacher (optional) OVERALL SCORE: OVERALL COMMENTS: Identifying Information 1- Needs Development 2- Effective 3- Very Effective Score Comments States name, date of birth, current grade and school Includes results and dates of vision/hearing screenings Indicates names were changes to ensure confidentiality Includes the of parents or teaches as appropriate Other OVERALL SCORE: OVERALL COMMENTS: REASON FOR REFERRAL 1- Needs Development 2- Effective 3- Very Effective SCORE COMMENTS States purpose of referral States who (name and position) initiated the referral Describes referral concerns in observable and measurable
cpse-eds-handbook-2014-15-Final-v2.docx