3. Clarity and Quality of Application 15% Applications will be rated on content, clarity, presentation and quality of application proposal based on legibility, completeness, – provision of data and clear definition of transportation needs and planned vehicle use. 5 4 3 2 1 Comments Excellent Good Satisfactory Below Average Unsatisfactory Raw Weight Score Score Weighted Data provided Data provided is Basic data is clear and clear. Extraneous 3.2 provided in a Data provided Data provided is concise and data included Provision of format that is is broad and confusing and 1 supports that does not Data easy to nonspecific. unclear. proposed support proposed understand. service. service. Compelling and Provides Provides basic specific extensive Cannot information Provides basic information information identify about information about 3.3 about about transportation transportation transportation 1 Clarity transportation transportation needs and needs and needs OR planned needs and needs and planned planned vehicle use. planned planned vehicle use. vehicle use. vehicle use. vehicle use. 4. Coordination of Service 10% Applicants must describe how their current and proposed service coordinates with other transportation services in the area to ensure broad community benefit. Applicants also must describe why existing DART services cannot meet their needs. 5 4 3 2 1 Comments Excellent Good Satisfactory Below Average Unsatisfactory Raw Weight Score Score Weighted Existing DART Existing DART Existing DART Existing DART Existing DART 4.1 services meet services meet services meet services meet services do not Unmet Needs less than 25% 25 50% of 50 75% of more than 75% 1 – – meet need. of need. need. need. of need.
3. Clarity and Quality of Application 15% Applications will be rated on content, clarity, presentation and quality of application proposal – based on legibility, completeness, provision of data and clear definition of transportation needs and planned vehicle use. 5 4 3 2 1 Weight Raw Score Weighted Score Comments Excellent Good Satisfactory Below Average Unsatisfactory 3.2 Provision of Data Data provided is clear and concise and supports proposed service. Data provided is clear. Extraneous data included that does not support proposed service. Basic data provided in a format that is easy to understand. Data provided is broad and nonspecific. Data provided is confusing and unclear. 1 3.3 Clarity Compelling and specific information about transportation needs and planned vehicle use. Provides extensive information about transportation needs and planned vehicle use. Provides basic information about transportation needs and planned vehicle use. Provides basic information about transportation needs OR planned vehicle use. Cannot identify transportation needs and planned vehicle use. 1 4. Coordination of Service 10% Applicants must describe how their current and proposed service coordinates with other transportation services in the area to ensure broad community benefit. Applicants also must describe why existing DART services cannot meet their needs. 5 4 3 2 1 Weight Raw Score Weighted Score Comments Excellent Good Satisfactory Below Average Unsatisfactory 4.1 Unmet Needs Existing DART services do not meet need. Existing DART services meet less than 25% of need. Existing DART services meet 25 – 50% of need. Existing DART services meet 50 – 75% of need. Existing DART services meet more than 75% of need. 1
DART%20Van%20Donation%20Program%20Scorecard%20-%202018.docx