IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Resolution for some GEN comments in SB1 Part II – Date: 2016-02-22 Author: Name Affiliation Address Phone Huawei 303 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 400, Edward Au Technologies Ottawa, Ontario K2K 3J1 This submission presents proposed resolution to CIDs 7574, 7575, 7127, 7406, 7407, 7401 and 7402. Changes indicated by instructions. Revision history: R0 initial version – R1 remove CIDs 7701 and 7702 from the document. – R2 remove CID 7403 from the document. – R3 update as per the changes made in the BRC meeting on February 24. – CID Clause Page Line Comment Proposed Change 7574 C.3 3074 14 "is a 77 bit subfield" -- what Call it a bitmap instead is this doing in the MIB? Discussion: Referring to line 3074.14, and Figure 9-333, Rx MCS Bitmasks subfield is of length 77 bits, but the commenter is correct that it is not necessary to describe the subfield and its corresponding length in MIB. Resolution:
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Resolution for some GEN comments in SB1 – Part II Date: 2016-02-22 Author: Name Affiliation Address Phone Edward Au Huawei Technologies 303 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 400, Ottawa, Ontario K2K 3J1 This submission presents proposed resolution to CIDs 7574, 7575, 7127, 7406, 7407, 7401 and 7402. Changes indicated by instructions. Revision history: R0 – initial version R1 – remove CIDs 7701 and 7702 from the document. R2 – remove CID 7403 from the document. R3 – update as per the changes made in the BRC meeting on February 24. CID Clause Page Line Comment Proposed Change 7574 C.3 3074 14 "is a 77 bit subfield" -- what is this doing in the MIB? Call it a bitmap instead Discussion: Referring to line 3074.14, and Figure 9-333, Rx MCS Bitmasks subfield is of length 77 bits, but the commenter is correct that it is not necessary to describe the subfield and its corresponding length in MIB. Resolution:
11-16-0288-03-000m-resolution-for-some-gen-comments-in-sb1-part-ii.docx