Accepted: "Other transmissions are not TGax editor, please recommended during the period." This make changes as is already stated in 9.4.2.244.2 and shown in document 9.4.2.244.3, so what's the point of Delete repeating it here? What is the point of transmissions stating it in either place, since the full are not 15775 178.16 9.4.2.244.4 under CID 15775 functionality is given in clause 27? recommended And with "shall", "should", and "may" during the being the standard and clear options period." for normative statements, why introduce the variant "not recommended"? Replace the Accepted: fourth paragraph TGax editor, please The frame format doesn't need to get of this section make changes as into the details of the content of the as: "The Quiet in document 15046 189.07 9.6.28.3 element carried in that frame. As such, Time Period delete the second sentence in the element is under CID 15046 fourth paragraph of 9.6.28.3 always present in the frame." 61 Reject: The spirit of the Quiet Time Period is to encourage a cooperative behavior Modify the among STAs in a paragraph as BSS. follows: "An AP that supports An STA with no At the end of the Quiet Time period, QTP shall set urgent data to send the HE STA that chooses not to be the QTP decides to pause its silent will have an unfair advantage Support field in countdown counter over the HE STA that decides to stay the AP's HE when another 374 quiet in term of access to the WM. Capabilities application The rule needs to be applied uniformly element to 1 and announces that it over all HE STAs, whether they shall set the will have heavy choose to be silent or not during the QTP Capability traffic. In doing so, QTP. field to 0 contention of the otherwise. All channel is reduced HE STAs shall during the period continue the and as a result, will countdown." improve the utilization of the radio resource.
15775 178.16 9.4.2.244.4 "Other transmissions are not recommended during the period." This is already stated in 9.4.2.244.2 and 9.4.2.244.3, so what's the point of repeating it here? What is the point of stating it in either place, since the full functionality is given in clause 27? And with "shall", "should", and "may" being the standard and clear options for normative statements, why introduce the variant "not recommended"? Delete transmissions are not recommended during the period." Accepted: TGax editor, please make changes as shown in document under CID 15775 15046 189.07 9.6.28.3 The frame format doesn't need to get into the details of the content of the element carried in that frame. As such, delete the second sentence in the fourth paragraph of 9.6.28.3 Replace the fourth paragraph of this section as: "The Quiet Time Period element is always present in the frame." Accepted: TGax editor, please make changes as in document under CID 15046 374 61 At the end of the Quiet Time period, the HE STA that chooses not to be silent will have an unfair advantage over the HE STA that decides to stay quiet in term of access to the WM. The rule needs to be applied uniformly over all HE STAs, whether they choose to be silent or not during the QTP. Modify the paragraph as follows: "An AP that supports QTP shall set the QTP Support field in the AP's HE Capabilities element to 1 and shall set the QTP Capability field to 0 otherwise. All HE STAs shall continue the countdown." Reject: The spirit of the Quiet Time Period is to encourage a cooperative behavior among STAs in a BSS. An STA with no urgent data to send decides to pause its countdown counter when another application announces that it will have heavy traffic. In doing so, contention of the channel is reduced during the period and as a result, will improve the utilization of the radio resource.
11-18-1855-00-00ax-comments-resolution-27-16-4.docx