CAAP Exam INDIRECT: CAAP CAAP Admini- Automated Exam Exam stration; scoring of 60.6% Average of Crtical UNA Objective Spring Critical exam (National CIS majors' 4) Thinking Questions 2012 Thinking questions Score) exam scores 61% Met 5/9/2013 Summary of previous assessment results and actions: No actions were planned as a result of previous assessments for this outcome. Results 2012-2013: Benchmark expectations were met on all four measures. Actions 2013-2014: No actions planned as a result of this assessment. Student Learning Outcome Assessment - Computer Information Systems Program Outcome c: An ability to design, implement, and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component, or program to meet desired Outcome Coordinator: Joan Parris Course Person Data Summary Comparison Selected Collecting Collection of Perform- to for Data Data for Details/ Assessment/ ance benchmark Type of Name of Type of Benchmark Reporting Collection evaluation Dates Evaluation Level expectation Data Measure Measure Expectation Date Process All CIS students; individual work; prepared Average of and DIRECT: all CIS Test submitted Average of student Question in Testing scores on scores on the requiring Lab Exam program writing (K233) program; tabluated by Inheritance Java Exam 4 - Instructor faculty John hierarchy Programs 4/30/13 evaluation member 1) CIS 225 Crabtree program 75% 93% Met 5/3/2013
4) CAAP Exam Crtical Thinking UNA CAAP Exam Objective Questions CAAP Exam Admini- stration; Spring 2012 Critical Thinking INDIRECT: Automated scoring of exam questions 60.6% (National Score) Average of CIS majors' exam scores 61% Met 5/9/2013 Summary of previous assessment results and actions: No actions were planned as a result of previous assessments for this outcome. Results 2012-2013: Benchmark expectations were met on all four measures. Actions 2013-2014: No actions planned as a result of this assessment. Student Learning Outcome Assessment - Computer Information Systems Program Outcome c: An ability to design, implement, and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component, or program to meet desired Outcome Coordinator: Joan Parris Course Selected for Data Collection Person Collecting Data for evaluation Type of Data Data Collection Details/ Dates Name of Measure Type of Measure Benchmark Expectation Summary of Assessment/ Evaluation Process Perform- ance Level Comparison to benchmark expectation Reporting Date 1) CIS 225 John Crabtree Test Question requiring writing Java Programs All CIS students; individual work; prepared and submitted in Testing Lab (K233) Exam 4 - 4/30/13 Inheritance hierarchy program DIRECT: Average of scores on Exam program; Instructor evaluation 75% Average of all CIS student scores on the program tabluated by faculty member 93% Met 5/3/2013
CSIS.docx