measurements, there experts did not agree is no reason why we that a more accurate need to stick to +/- value was possible 5dB we should be and useful output is making a target of generated in real 1dB. As many will systems with an know I have been accuracy estimated to advocating the DSC be about 5dB. mechanism that uses Commenter can the Beacon RSSI. As review equation R-2 of such an algorithm for Annex R.7 P3801 to determining the see where RSSI is Beacon RSSI has used, noting that in the been presented that earliest accounts for a mobile implementations, a STA, missed beacons simple comparison of etc. but uses the RSSI is often Beacon RSSI to adjust employed rather than effective CCA a calculation such as thresheld. This is a is described in R.7. good use for Beacon RSSI but even if DSC is adopted there is still no need to have this seperate Clause. CCCID54 1153 "The Estimated Air Replace cited with Revise TGmd editor – Time Fraction subfield "The Estimated Air to make changes as Fischer is 8 bits in length and Time Fraction shown in contains an unsigned subfield is 8 bits in that are integer that represents length and contains marked with CID 1153. the predicted an unsigned integer These changes percentage of time, that represents the improve the wording, linearly scaled with predicted similar to the 255 representing percentage of time, requested changes. 100%, that a new STA linearly scaled with joining the BSS will be 255 representing allocated for that 100%, not used by contain only MPDUs PPDUs that contain with the Type subfield only MPDUs with equal to Data of the the Type subfield corresponding access equal to Data, of category for that STA." the corresponding "Allocated"? So the access category." STA is using HCCA, or EDCA Admission Control? What scheme is in use here that we have allocation of BW to specific STAs, and traffic? In addition, what is %, the fraction of all traffic or fraction of just that AC traffic? This is unclear, but why have this for every AC and how is this to be interpreted? Also
measurements, there is no reason why we need to stick to +/- 5dB we should be making a target of 1dB. As many will know I have been advocating the DSC mechanism that uses the Beacon RSSI. As such an algorithm for determining the Beacon RSSI has been presented that accounts for a mobile STA, missed beacons etc. but uses the Beacon RSSI to adjust effective CCA thresheld. This is a good use for Beacon RSSI but even if DSC is adopted there is still no need to have this seperate Clause. CCCID54 experts did not agree that a more accurate value was possible and useful output is generated in real systems with an accuracy estimated to be about 5dB. Commenter can review equation R-2 of Annex R.7 P3801 to see where RSSI is used, noting that in the earliest implementations, a simple comparison of RSSI is often employed rather than a calculation such as is described in R.7. 1153 Fischer "The Estimated Air Time Fraction subfield is 8 bits in length and contains an unsigned integer that represents the predicted percentage of time, linearly scaled with 255 representing 100%, that a new STA joining the BSS will be allocated for that contain only MPDUs with the Type subfield equal to Data of the corresponding access category for that STA." "Allocated"? So the STA is using HCCA, or EDCA Admission Control? What scheme is in use here that we have allocation of BW to specific STAs, and traffic? In addition, what is %, the fraction of all traffic or fraction of just that AC traffic? This is unclear, but why have this for every AC and how is this to be interpreted? Also Replace cited with "The Estimated Air Time Fraction subfield is 8 bits in length and contains an unsigned integer that represents the predicted percentage of time, linearly scaled with 255 representing 100%, not used by PPDUs that contain only MPDUs with the Type subfield equal to Data, of the corresponding access category." Revise – TGmd editor to make changes as shown in that are marked with CID 1153. These changes improve the wording, similar to the requested changes.
11-17-1192-22-000m-cr-esp.docx