mentions whatever that means… and furthermore, the entity in question, perhaps best described as an algorithm, has definite expectations of future events and as evidenced by the commenter’s lack of a decent alternative, there seems to be no word in the English language that would make a decent substitute for in thi “expects” case 6355 John 74.07 Anthropomorphism: Reword to remove Reject is – Coffey "the TWT requesting the corporations are STA expects". The people, then it STA is an object and follows that STAs does not "expect" are people, see anything. USA supreme court cases which established these facts almost 200 17 years ago: – U.S. 518 (1819) 125 U.S. and – 181 (1888) also – note that neither the 802.11 style guide nor the IEEE SA style guide mentions whatever that means… and furthermore, the entity in question, perhaps best described as an algorithm, has definite
mentions whatever that means… and furthermore, the entity in question, perhaps best described as an algorithm, has definite expectations of future events and as evidenced by the commenter’s lack of a decent alternative, there seems to be no word in the English language that would make a decent substitute for “expects” in thi case 6355 John Coffey 74.07 Anthropomorphism: "the TWT requesting STA expects". The STA is an object and does not "expect" anything. Reword to remove the Reject – is corporations are people, then it follows that STAs are people, see USA supreme court cases which established these facts almost 200 years ago: – 17 U.S. 518 (1819) and – 125 U.S. 181 (1888) – also note that neither the 802.11 style guide nor the IEEE SA style guide mentions whatever that means… and furthermore, the entity in question, perhaps best described as an algorithm, has definite
11-17-0777-01-00ax-cr-twt-ie.docx