Results CAAP provided Exam INDIRECT: from CAAP CAAP Admini- Automated OIRPA. Exam-- Exam Abiltiy to scoring of stration; Benchmark Critical UNA Objective analyze a Spring Spring exam set at 3) OIRPA Questions 61% 81% Met 2013 2013 problem questions National No actions were planned as a result of previous assessments for this outcome. Summary of previous assessment results and actions: Average Benchmark expectations were met on all three measures. Results 2012- 2013: No new actions planned as a result of this assessment. Action Plan 2013-2014: Student Learning Outcome Assessment - Computer Science Program Outcome c: An ability to design, implement, and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component, or program to meet desired needs Outcome Coordinator: James Jerkins Course Person Data Summary Comparison Selected Collecting Collection of to for Data Data for Type of Details/ Name of Type of Benchmark ance benchmark Reporting Collection evaluation Data Dates Measure Measure Expectation Evaluation expectation Date Process Question on sorting DIRECT: component Ability to Average based on evaluate an score on Test project algorithmic test Scored by Week 1) CS 355 Jenkins response Dec. 2012 process response 75% instructor 70% Not Met 4/22/13
3) CAAP Exam-- Critical UNA OIRPA CAAP Exam Objective Questions CAAP Exam Admini- stration; Spring 2013 Abiltiy to analyze a problem INDIRECT: Automated scoring of exam questions 61% Results provided from OIRPA. Benchmark set at National Average 81% Met Spring 2013 Summary of previous assessment results and actions: No actions were planned as a result of previous assessments for this outcome. Results 2012- 2013: Benchmark expectations were met on all three measures. Action Plan 2013-2014: No new actions planned as a result of this assessment. Student Learning Outcome Assessment - Computer Science Program Outcome c: An ability to design, implement, and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component, or program to meet desired needs Outcome Coordinator: James Jerkins Course Selected for Data Collection Person Collecting Data for evaluation Type of Data Data Collection Details/ Dates Name of Measure Type of Measure Benchmark Expectation Summary of Evaluation Process ance Comparison to benchmark expectation Reporting Date 1) CS 355 Jenkins Test response Question on sorting component based on project Dec. 2012 Ability to evaluate an algorithmic process DIRECT: Average score on test response 75% Scored by instructor 70% Not Met Week 4/22/13
CSIS.docx