802.19 comment Remove first Rejected from Benjamin Rolfe: sentence after "7.125 This paragraph is not GHz"; remove This is not a comment on the draft consistent with the second sentence. amendment, however with respect to the CA project scope for Add a list of the document: 802.11ax nor the bands in which current content of the 802.11ax will Change "Though the PAR specifies the draft. It is also operate. frequency range between 1 GHz and 7.125 inconsistent with GHz, the focus of 802.11ax is on the 2.4 clause 5.6 of this GHz and the 5 GHz frequency bands. document. . Therefore 802.11ax will be an enhancement to 802.11n in 2.4 GHz and 802.11ac in 5 GHz." to "Though the PAR specifies the frequency range between 1 GHz and 7.125 GHz, 802.11ax is an enhancement to 802.11n in 2.4 GHz and 802.11ac in 5 GHz frequency bands and an extension into the 6 GHz band." Refer to 16890 802.19 comment Provide technical Rejected from Benjamin analysis of how the This paragraph 802.11ax signals will This is not a comment on the draft describes CCA as perform with respect amendment, however with respect to the CA "The mechanism" for to other 802 wireless document: coexistence with services in the same other 802 wireless bands of operation The IEEE 802 systems other than both potential impact LMSC OPERATIONS MANUAL states as legacy 802.11, but of 802.11ax as follows "The CA document shall address does not provide any "assailant" and as coexistence with all relevant approved IEEE analysis of the effect "victim" The CAD 802 LMSC wireless of CCA on mitigating should characterize standards specifying devices for unlicensed interference. the performance of operation. The WG should consider other each system (e.g. specifications in their identified target packet loss, latency) band(s) in the CA document." and include all 802 systems operating in 802.11 coexistence with non-802.11 the same bands. systems is addressed in Section 3 of the CA Where the expected document. There is no LMSC requirement performance and for analysis or simulation or testing. impacts are "just like" analysis done CA document has been amended to for previous acknowledge UWB with the relevant standards, reference regulations. Refer to CAD documents as appropriate.
802.19 comment from Benjamin Rolfe: This paragraph is not consistent with the project scope for 802.11ax nor the current content of the draft. It is also inconsistent with clause 5.6 of this document. . Remove first sentence after "7.125 GHz"; remove second sentence. Add a list of the bands in which 802.11ax will operate. Rejected This is not a comment on the draft amendment, however with respect to the CA document: Change "Though the PAR specifies the frequency range between 1 GHz and 7.125 GHz, the focus of 802.11ax is on the 2.4 GHz and the 5 GHz frequency bands. Therefore 802.11ax will be an enhancement to 802.11n in 2.4 GHz and 802.11ac in 5 GHz." to "Though the PAR specifies the frequency range between 1 GHz and 7.125 GHz, 802.11ax is an enhancement to 802.11n in 2.4 GHz and 802.11ac in 5 GHz frequency bands and an extension into the 6 GHz band." Refer to 16890 802.19 comment from Benjamin This paragraph describes CCA as "The mechanism" for coexistence with other 802 wireless systems other than legacy 802.11, but does not provide any analysis of the effect of CCA on mitigating interference. Provide technical analysis of how the 802.11ax signals will perform with respect to other 802 wireless services in the same bands of operation both potential impact of 802.11ax as "assailant" and as "victim" The CAD should characterize the performance of each system (e.g. packet loss, latency) and include all 802 systems operating in the same bands. Where the expected performance and impacts are "just like" analysis done for previous standards, reference CAD documents as appropriate. Rejected This is not a comment on the draft amendment, however with respect to the CA document: The IEEE 802 LMSC OPERATIONS MANUAL states as follows "The CA document shall address coexistence with all relevant approved IEEE 802 LMSC wireless standards specifying devices for unlicensed operation. The WG should consider other specifications in their identified target band(s) in the CA document." 802.11 coexistence with non-802.11 systems is addressed in Section 3 of the CA document. There is no LMSC requirement for analysis or simulation or testing. CA document has been amended to acknowledge UWB with the relevant regulations. Refer to
11-18-1532-01-00ax-tgax-coexistence-assurance-document-comments.docx