Table 3: Correlations between measures of alexithymia and experiential avoidance reported in included studies. Study Measure of Measure of Statistical test used Reported effect Standardised effect values p Alexithymia Experiential sizes sizes (r) Avoidance (1) Beroccal et al, 2009 TAS-20 AAQ Pearson’s .47 .47 < .01 r (2) Bilotta et al, 2015 TAS-20 AAQ-II Pearson’s .63 .63 < .001 r (3) Landstra et al, 2013 DI, DD subscales AAQ-II Pearson’s .69 .69 < .001 r of TAS-20 (4) Losada et al, 2014 DI, DD subscales AAQ-II Pearson’s .19 .19 < .01 r of TAS-20 (5) Mennin et al, 2005 DI subscale of TMMS Attention .23 .11 < .01 d TAS-20 TMMS Mood .47 .22 Repair .28 DD subscale of .34 TAS-20 TMMS Attention .14 TMMS Mood .17 Repair (6) Orcutt et al, 2005 TAS-20 AAQ Pearson’s .61 .61 < .05 r (7) Paez et al, 2013 TAS-20 (Spanish ERQ Pearson’s .39 .39 < .01 r Version) (8) Panayiotou et al, 2015 (a) TAS-20 AAQ-II Pearson’s .558 .558 < .01 r (9) Panayiotou et al, 2015 (b) TAS-20 AAQ-II Pearson’s .438 .438 < .01 r (10) Stewart et al, 2002 TAS-20 EAS Pearson’s .59 .59 < .001 r (11) Venta et al, 2012 TAS-20 AFQ-Y Pearson’s .42 .42 < .01 r
Table 3: Correlations between measures of alexithymia and experiential avoidance reported in included studies. Study Measure of Alexithymia Measure of Experiential Avoidance Statistical test used Reported effect sizes Standardised effect sizes (r) p values (1) Beroccal et al, 2009 TAS-20 AAQ Pearson’s r .47 .47 < .01 (2) Bilotta et al, 2015 TAS-20 AAQ-II Pearson’s r .63 .63 < .001 (3) Landstra et al, 2013 DI, DD subscales of TAS-20 AAQ-II Pearson’s r .69 .69 < .001 (4) Losada et al, 2014 DI, DD subscales of TAS-20 AAQ-II Pearson’s r .19 .19 < .01 (5) Mennin et al, 2005 DI subscale of TAS-20 DD subscale of TAS-20 TMMS Attention TMMS Mood Repair TMMS Attention TMMS Mood Repair d .23 .47 .28 .34 .11 .22 .14 .17 < .01 (6) Orcutt et al, 2005 TAS-20 AAQ Pearson’s r .61 .61 < .05 (7) Paez et al, 2013 TAS-20 (Spanish Version) ERQ Pearson’s r .39 .39 < .01 (8) Panayiotou et al, 2015 (a) TAS-20 AAQ-II Pearson’s r .558 .558 < .01 (9) Panayiotou et al, 2015 (b) TAS-20 AAQ-II Pearson’s r .438 .438 < .01 (10) Stewart et al, 2002 TAS-20 EAS Pearson’s r .59 .59 < .001 (11) Venta et al, 2012 TAS-20 AFQ-Y Pearson’s r .42 .42 < .01
E-Thesis%20-%20Bryony%20Fairhurst.docx