Original Excellent work (8-10 points): Standard work (4-7 Improvement (0-3 points): Response to Student provides a thoughtful points): Student does not include a Prompt reflection (personal feelings Student provides either a personal reflection nor do they (content) and application of the topic thoughtful reflection or focus their analysis on the main as it relates to their career) analysis of the prompt’s topic of the prompt. and critical analysis of the topic but not both. topic. Original Excellent work (4-5 points): Standard work (2-3 Needs Improvement (0-1 Response to Student clearly points): points): Prompt communicates their ideas and Student’s message is Multiple grammar or spelling (communication uses proper grammar and mostly clear but there are errors lead to poor of spelling. multiple grammar or communication of ideas. grammar) spelling errors which make understanding difficult. Reply #1 Excellent work (4-5 points): Standard work (2-3 Improvement (0-1 point): Student provides a points): Student does not offers a respectful reply and critique Student provides a very short reply that does not using proper grammar and respectful reply but an add anything new to the spelling. Student adds to the element of their reply is discussion, has a disjointed comments of the classmate unclear/poorly reply, or provides a by explaining how the communicated and/or the disrespectful reply that is more classmate’s post impacted student does not build attacking than critiquing the them or offering an upon the classmate’s classmate’s ideas. alternative viewpoint to the post. classmate. Reply #2 Excellent work (4-5 points): Standard work (2-3 Needs Improvement (0-1 Student provides a clear, points): point): respectful reply and critique Student provides a Student does not reply, offers a using proper grammar and respectful reply but an very short reply that does not spelling. Student adds to the element of their reply is add anything new to the comments of the classmate unclear/poorly discussion, has a disjointed by explaining how the communicated and/or the reply, or provides a classmate’s post impacted student does not build disrespectful reply that is more them or offering an upon the classmate’s attacking than critiquing the alternative viewpoint to the post. classmate’s ideas. classmate.
Original Response to Prompt (content) Excellent work (8-10 points): Student provides a thoughtful reflection (personal feelings and application of the topic as it relates to their career) and critical analysis of the topic. Standard work (4-7 points): Student provides either a thoughtful reflection or analysis of the prompt’s topic but not both. Improvement (0-3 points): Student does not include a personal reflection nor do they focus their analysis on the main topic of the prompt. Original Response to Prompt (communication of grammar) Excellent work (4-5 points): Student clearly communicates their ideas and uses proper grammar and spelling. Standard work (2-3 points): Student’s message is mostly clear but there are multiple grammar or spelling errors which make understanding difficult. Needs Improvement (0-1 points): Multiple grammar or spelling errors lead to poor communication of ideas. Reply #1 Excellent work (4-5 points): Student provides a respectful reply and critique using proper grammar and spelling. Student adds to the comments of the classmate by explaining how the classmate’s post impacted them or offering an alternative viewpoint to the classmate. Standard work (2-3 points): Student provides a respectful reply but an element of their reply is unclear/poorly communicated and/or the student does not build upon the classmate’s post. Improvement (0-1 point): Student does not offers a very short reply that does not add anything new to the discussion, has a disjointed reply, or provides a disrespectful reply that is more attacking than critiquing the classmate’s ideas. Reply #2 Excellent work (4-5 points): Student provides a clear, respectful reply and critique using proper grammar and spelling. Student adds to the comments of the classmate by explaining how the classmate’s post impacted them or offering an alternative viewpoint to the classmate. Standard work (2-3 points): Student provides a respectful reply but an element of their reply is unclear/poorly communicated and/or the student does not build upon the classmate’s post. Needs Improvement (0-1 point): Student does not reply, offers a very short reply that does not add anything new to the discussion, has a disjointed reply, or provides a disrespectful reply that is more attacking than critiquing the classmate’s ideas.
Discussion-Rubric-1.docx