Critical Lens for Choosing Principal Rubrics SED Approved Principal Rubrics Considerations The Leadership Performance Multi-dimensional Principal Performance Rubric Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership Matrix (MPPR) in Education Cost None for rubric alone Cost embedded into Professional Development $360 for each principal Content Resilience *Domains: Connections to External Personal Behavior Shared Vision of Learning Performance Accountability Student Achievement School Culture and Instructional Program High Standards for Student Learning Decision Making Safe, Efficient, Effective Learning Environment Rigorous Curriculum Communication Political, Social, Economic, Legal and Cultural Context Quality Instruction Faculty Development Community, Integrity, Fairness, Ethics Culture of Learning and Professional Leadership Development *The following dimensions are used to flesh out Behavior Time/Task/Project Management each domain: Technology Culture, Sustainability, Instructional Program, Learning Capacity Building and Strategic Planning Process SED link: SED link: SED link: Technology Component Supported in iObservation-an Site License includes: Online survey, reports generated online tool for collecting and Online PD including sources of evidence, reporting evaluations of teachers Enhanced Rubric with Hyperlinks effectiveness rating (included in and principals to a variety of under development for use in initial cost) “App” audiences. observation iObservation can be customized Cost TBD on some levels to suit districts Cost TBD (may be aideable) Research/Rationale First edition of Assessing Developed by LCI, Inc. based on the work of 360 ° evaluation tool, originally Educational Leaders, containing Communities for Learning and with ISLLC standards funded by Wallace Foundation and Leadership Performance Matrix, embedded; research supporting the domains supported by Vanderbilt University. published in 2004, second edition provided and research on the rubric underway. Six research studies on reliability and in 2008. validity have been conducted and five others are underway.
Critical Lens for Choosing Principal Rubrics Considerations SED Approved Principal Rubrics The Leadership Performance Matrix Multi-dimensional Principal Performance Rubric (MPPR) Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education Cost None for rubric alone Cost embedded into Professional Development $360 for each principal Content Resilience Personal Behavior Student Achievement Decision Making Communication Faculty Development Leadership Development Time/Task/Project Management Technology Learning SED link: *Domains: Shared Vision of Learning School Culture and Instructional Program Safe, Efficient, Effective Learning Environment Political, Social, Economic, Legal and Cultural Context Community, Integrity, Fairness, Ethics *The following dimensions are used to flesh out each domain: Culture, Sustainability, Instructional Program, Capacity Building and Strategic Planning Process SED link: Connections to External Performance Accountability High Standards for Student Learning Rigorous Curriculum Quality Instruction Culture of Learning and Professional Behavior SED link: Technology Component Supported in iObservation-an online tool for collecting and reporting evaluations of teachers and principals to a variety of audiences. iObservation can be customized on some levels to suit districts Cost TBD (may be aideable) Site License includes: Online PD Enhanced Rubric with Hyperlinks “App” under development for use in observation Cost TBD Online survey, reports generated including sources of evidence, effectiveness rating (included in initial cost) Research/Rationale First edition of Assessing Educational Leaders, containing Leadership Performance Matrix, published in 2004, second edition in 2008. Developed by LCI, Inc. based on the work of Communities for Learning and with ISLLC standards embedded; research supporting the domains provided and research on the rubric underway. 360 ° evaluation tool, originally funded by Wallace Foundation and supported by Vanderbilt University. Six research studies on reliability and validity have been conducted and five others are underway.
critical_lens_for_choosing_rubrics.docx