even if we are allowed to, should we? What is gained? 9107 207.62 The following Change the cited Accepted sentence setence to "NOTE--The HE STA can GAS protocol use the GAS can be used by protocol to an HE STA to transport an inform an AP element that the type of informs an AP about the type(s) operations" of STA-to-STA does not read operations that the correctly and HE STA supports." the grammar requires some correction. 6809 208.05 Mandatory Reword to Revised. Text is added to clause 27.16.4.1 to clarify requirements eliminate the the conditional mandatory embedded in If the idea is behaviour. optional mode: to describe some earlier it's sort of stated that an conditionally AP "may" mandatory operate this behavior, then way, but here reword the we have a introductory "shall". If this is language to make just an it clear that this is illustrative an optional mode example, it is rather than simly confusing and an illustrative inappropriate example. to have mandatory language included. Duplicate. [6809] 6810 208.11 Mandatory Reword to requirements eliminate the embedded in "shall". If the idea optional mode: is to describe some earlier it's sort of stated that an conditionally AP "may" mandatory operate this behavior, then way, but here reword the
even if we are allowed to, should we? What is gained? 9107 207.62 The following sentence "NOTE--The GAS protocol can be used by an HE STA to inform an AP the type of operations" does not read correctly and the grammar requires some correction. Change the cited setence to HE STA can use the GAS protocol to transport an element that informs an AP about the type(s) of STA-to-STA operations that the HE STA supports." Accepted 6809 208.05 Mandatory requirements embedded in optional mode: earlier it's stated that an AP "may" operate this way, but here we have a "shall". If this is just an illustrative example, it is confusing and inappropriate to have mandatory language included. Reword to eliminate the If the idea is to describe some sort of conditionally mandatory behavior, then reword the introductory language to make it clear that this is an optional mode rather than simly an illustrative example. Revised. Text is added to clause 27.16.4.1 to clarify the conditional mandatory behaviour. 6810 208.11 Mandatory requirements embedded in optional mode: earlier it's stated that an AP "may" operate this way, but here Reword to eliminate the "shall". If the idea is to describe some sort of conditionally mandatory behavior, then reword the Duplicate. [6809]
11-17-0700-00-00ax-quiet-time-period-part-2.docx