does the receiving device by concatenating the 4 know the TSF timer value octet TSF Completion of the transmitting STA? field in the S1G Beacon Compatibility element with the Timestamp field in the S1G Beacon frame as described in 10.1.3.10.3 (TSF timer accuracy with S1G Beacon). TGah editor makes changes for Page 16 Line 14 sentence (from a table of sub-clause 6.3.3.3.2) as the following: a Short Probe “When Response or an S1G Beacon is received, the timestamp is the 4 least significant octets of the TSF timer value of the transmitting STA.” to a Short Probe “When Response or an S1G Beacon is received, the timestamp is reconstructed as described in 10.1.3.10.3 (TSF timer accuracy with S1G Beacon).” 8245 The replacement figure Correct figure or editing Revised- now conflicts with figure instructions: either remove Agree in principal. 9-2 in the base standard. the content that replicates This may be an in the figure 9-2 in the base In the base standard, the editing instructions, standard or change to DMG related figure was intending that the new 9-1 "replace figure 9-1 and separated to Figure 9-2. replace both 9-1 and 9-2? figure 9-2" TGah editor changes as shown in 8248 The text shown as NOT Delete all changes to cluase Revised- changed does not match 10.2 Agree in principal. the text in the base standard. (Tble 10-2 row The text of Table 10-2 of 2). This makes applying the base standard has the modified text and been updated. understanding the result impossible, or at least TGah editor changes highly improbably. as shown in 8249 It is not entirely clear what Withdraw the from Rejected- standard this amendment sponsor ballot, bring it in All amendments is amending. The draft line with the base standrd developed in IEEE states that "This being amended, and 802.11 WG are aligning
does the receiving device know the TSF timer value of the transmitting STA? by concatenating the 4 octet TSF Completion field in the S1G Beacon Compatibility element with the Timestamp field in the S1G Beacon frame as described in 10.1.3.10.3 (TSF timer accuracy with S1G Beacon). TGah editor makes changes for Page 16 Line 14 sentence (from a table of sub-clause 6.3.3.3.2) as the following: “When a Short Probe Response or an S1G Beacon is received, the timestamp is the 4 least significant octets of the TSF timer value of the transmitting STA.” to “When a Short Probe Response or an S1G Beacon is received, the timestamp is reconstructed as described in 10.1.3.10.3 (TSF timer accuracy with S1G Beacon).” 8245 The replacement figure now conflicts with figure 9-2 in the base standard. This may be an in the editing instructions, intending that the new 9-1 replace both 9-1 and 9-2? Correct figure or editing instructions: either remove the content that replicates figure 9-2 in the base standard or change to "replace figure 9-1 and figure 9-2" Revised- Agree in principal. In the base standard, the DMG related figure was separated to Figure 9-2. TGah editor changes as shown in 8248 The text shown as NOT changed does not match the text in the base standard. (Tble 10-2 row 2). This makes applying the modified text and understanding the result impossible, or at least highly improbably. Delete all changes to cluase 10.2 Revised- Agree in principal. The text of Table 10-2 of the base standard has been updated. TGah editor changes as shown in 8249 It is not entirely clear what standard this amendment is amending. The draft states that "This Withdraw the from sponsor ballot, bring it in line with the base standrd being amended, and Rejected- All amendments developed in IEEE 802.11 WG are aligning
11-16-0020-00-00ah-sb0-comment-resolution-part5.docx