Required subfield set to 0)" 12540 27.9.2.3 294.27 the notes are too weak. Fix the issue See 11-17-LLLLrY Chu Transferring them to mentioned in normative requirement. comment. 13155 Qi 27.9.2.3 294.27 Add a normative text to As in the comment See 11-17-LLLLrY Xue cover the following two notes: NOTE 1--The STA can increase but not decrease the chosen SRG OBSS_PD level or non-SRG OBSS_PD level during an OBSS_PD SR transmit power restriction period. NOTE 2--The STA's power is always equal or lower than the minimum TXPWRmax among all TXPWRmax from ongoing OBSS_PD SR transmit power restriction periods. 11812 27.9.2.3 294.29 Note 1 is unnecessary. Remove NOTE 1. See 11-17-LLLLrY Li STA should be allowed to decrease its OBSS_PD level to be more conservative. This restriction does not not seem necessary. 13065 27.9.2.3 295.01 Figure 27-10 is an as in comment See 11-17-LLLLrY enigma to me. It needs some explanation and those S1 and D1. 14216 Yunbo 27.9.2.3 295.01 Since restriction period Can we keep only See 11-17-LLLLrY Li 1, 2 and 3 terminated at single restriction the same time, why do period during the we need to introduce OBSS_PD_SR? multiple restriction periods in the mechanism? In Figure 27-10 "S2 max as indicated See 11-17-LLLLrY 27.9.2.3 295.10 June is equal to max (..." Wang should be change to "min (... "
Required subfield set to 0)" 12540 Chu 27.9.2.3 294.27 the notes are too weak. Transferring them to normative requirement. Fix the issue mentioned in comment. See 11-17-LLLLrY 13155 Qi Xue 27.9.2.3 294.27 Add a normative text to cover the following two notes: NOTE 1--The STA can increase but not decrease the chosen SRG OBSS_PD level or non-SRG OBSS_PD level during an OBSS_PD SR transmit power restriction period. NOTE 2--The STA's power is always equal or lower than the minimum TXPWRmax among all TXPWRmax from ongoing OBSS_PD SR transmit power restriction periods. As in the comment See 11-17-LLLLrY 11812 Li 27.9.2.3 294.29 Note 1 is unnecessary. STA should be allowed to decrease its OBSS_PD level to be more conservative. This restriction does not not seem necessary. Remove NOTE 1. See 11-17-LLLLrY 13065 27.9.2.3 295.01 Figure 27-10 is an enigma to me. It needs some explanation and those S1 and D1. as in comment See 11-17-LLLLrY 14216 Yunbo Li 27.9.2.3 295.01 Since restriction period 1, 2 and 3 terminated at the same time, why do we need to introduce multiple restriction periods in the mechanism? Can we keep only single restriction period during the OBSS_PD_SR? See 11-17-LLLLrY June Wang 27.9.2.3 295.10 In Figure 27-10 "S2 max is equal to max (..." should be change to "min (... " as indicated See 11-17-LLLLrY
11-18-0026-02-00ax-cr-srg-and-srp.docx