Table 2. Continued. Limestone Dopant Concentration C. C. after 13 or Asymptotic C. C. Mass loss Total added Cl- Cl- ion % of dopant 50 cycles (1 SD) % (Grasa) % ion % (XRF)* after 13 ∆m mole-% cycles (XRF) Havelock MgCl2 0.165 16.25 7.73 23.92 0.33 0.0 SM (calcined) CaCl2 SM 0.138 14.20 6.40 30.11 0.27 0.0 Grignard QWI 0.15 15.73 10.05 32.87 0.15* 0.0 Reagent Purbeck Undoped 0 19.86 13.79 3.66 - - Mg(NO3)2 0.143 21.08 15.28 5.35 - - QWI 0.19 20.83 (0.92) 16.08 5.21 - - MgCl2 QWI 0.165 17.38 (1.57) 14.75 3.52 0.33 0.0 0.755 14.43 14.12 4.22 1.51 0.07 0.138 17.82 ( 0.65) 15.01 1.77 0.27 0.0 QWI 0.165 16.12 15.32 2.88 0.34 0.07
Table 2. Continued. Limestone Dopant Concentration of dopant mole-% C. C. after 13 or 50 cycles (1 SD) Asymptotic C. C. % (Grasa) Mass loss ∆m % Total added Cl- ion % (XRF)* Cl- ion % after 13 cycles (XRF) Havelock (calcined) MgCl2 SM 0.165 16.25 7.73 23.92 0.33 0.0 CaCl2 SM 0.138 14.20 6.40 30.11 0.27 0.0 Grignard QWI Reagent 0.15 15.73 10.05 32.87 0.15* 0.0 Purbeck Undoped 0 19.86 13.79 3.66 - - Mg(NO3)2 QWI 0.143 21.08 15.28 5.35 - - 0.19 20.83 (0.92) 16.08 5.21 - - MgCl2 QWI 0.165 17.38 (1.57) 14.75 3.52 0.33 0.0 0.755 14.43 14.12 4.22 1.51 0.07 QWI 0.138 17.82 ( 0.65) 15.01 1.77 0.27 0.0 0.165 16.12 15.32 2.88 0.34 0.07
Doping-paper-plaintext-190912finalcleanversion.docx