437 6 12 E Include For completeness and inclusiveness, prior chair add Xiaoming Peng's name as a in list Should read "Xiaoming Peng and Jiamin Chen, Chairs". Note that this is what we have done in the past when over the course of development of the document there have been multiple chairs, for example in 11mb and 11v Proposed resolution: Accepted. According to the usual practice, add Xiaoming Peng as a chair at P6L12 as follows: following were officers of Task aj: “The Xiaoming PENG and Jiamin CHEN, Chairs Haiming WANG, Vice-Chair Jiamin CHEN, Technical Editor Shiwen HE, Sub-Technical Editor” Technical comments: CID Clause Comment Proposed Change 404 9.4.2.1 41 42 T Table 9-76 shows number of Either get ANA to Element ID Extension values update the database as being assigned to with matching P802.11aj. However, those do Element ID not seem to exist in the latest Extension assignment ANA database or replace all the Were these properly assigned? If so, why is there values in P802.11aj no ANA database update Table 9-76 with showing that? "<ANA>" to indicate that these need to be assigned by ANA. Proposed resolution: Rejected Actually the values for the Element ID Extension in Table 9-76 were assigned by ANA authority after May meeting. The authority updated the ANA database in 11-11/0270r35 ). Anyway thanks the commenter for reminding. (URL:
437 6 12 E Include prior chair in list For completeness and inclusiveness, add Xiaoming Peng's name as a Should read "Xiaoming Peng and Jiamin Chen, Chairs". Note that this is what we have done in the past when over the course of development of the document there have been multiple chairs, for example in 11mb and 11v Proposed resolution: Accepted. According to the usual practice, add Xiaoming Peng as a chair at P6L12 as follows: “The following were officers of Task aj: Xiaoming PENG and Jiamin CHEN, Chairs Haiming WANG, Vice-Chair Jiamin CHEN, Technical Editor Shiwen HE, Sub-Technical Editor” Technical comments: CID Clause Comment Proposed Change 404 9.4.2.1 41 42 T Table 9-76 shows number of Element ID Extension values as being assigned to P802.11aj. However, those do not seem to exist in the latest ANA database Were these properly assigned? If so, why is there no ANA database update showing that? Either get ANA to update the database with matching Element ID Extension assignment or replace all the values in P802.11aj Table 9-76 with "<ANA>" to indicate that these need to be assigned by ANA. Proposed resolution: Rejected Actually the values for the Element ID Extension in Table 9-76 were assigned by ANA authority after May meeting. The authority updated the ANA database in 11-11/0270r35 (URL: ). Anyway thanks the commenter for reminding.
11-16-0972-01-00aj-proposed-resolution-to-cid-401-402-408-416-423-424-427-431-436-437-404-406-407-409-410-411-418-419-422-425-426-and-428-in-lb220.docx