This view has persisted even in the face of a mounting body of evidence that judges often decide matters in a way that correlates with their political orientations or other attitudinal factors. Ultimately, the role of courts is and has been very similar to that of other administrators in the networked environment of new public governance. If the public, attorneys and judges are educated realistically and embrace this role, they can and should embrace the potential for the legal system to play a vital role of shaping policy and providing meaningful stewardship of regime values for the foreseeable future. If not, then courts may well wane in significance through a pattern of self-limitation and irrelevance. Works Cited Ackerman, B.A. (1974) and the Modern Mind” by Jerome Vol. 103, Daedalus, “’Law 119-130. Bailey, M.A. and Maltzman, F. (2011) The Constrained Trial: Law, Politics and the Decisions Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Justices Make. Bandes, S.A. (2011). Imagination in Judging.” Vol. 51, 1-24. Washburn Law Review, “Moral Baum, L. (2006) Princeton, Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. NJ: Princeton University Press. Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (2d ed. 2009), Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Beecher-Monas, E. (2011). Testimony in Civil Cases.” In Henderson, C. and Epstein, J. “Expert (Eds.) The Future of Evidence: How Science and Technology Will Change the Practice Chicago: American Bar Association, 33-76. of Law. Bingham, L.B. (2010). Next Generation of Administrative Law: Building the “The Infrastructure for Collaborative Governance”. 2010 University of Wisconsin Law Review, volume, 297-356. (1971), 403 U.S. 388. Bivens v. Six Unnamed Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics Boyd, C.L. (2013) Settle It?”. Vol. 1, 193-219. Journal of Law and Courts, “She’ll
This view has persisted even in the face of a mounting body of evidence that judges often decide matters in a way that correlates with their political orientations or other attitudinal factors. Ultimately, the role of courts is and has been very similar to that of other administrators in the networked environment of new public governance. If the public, attorneys and judges are educated realistically and embrace this role, they can and should embrace the potential for the legal system to play a vital role of shaping policy and providing meaningful stewardship of regime values for the foreseeable future. If not, then courts may well wane in significance through a pattern of self-limitation and irrelevance. Works Cited Ackerman, B.A. (1974) “’Law and the Modern Mind” by Jerome Daedalus, Vol. 103, 119-130. Bailey, M.A. and Maltzman, F. (2011) The Constrained Law, Politics and the Decisions Justices Make. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Bandes, S.A. (2011). “Moral Imagination in Judging.” Washburn Law Review, Vol. 51, 1-24. Baum, L. (2006) Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (2d ed. 2009), Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Beecher-Monas, E. (2011). “Expert Testimony in Civil Cases.” In Henderson, C. and Epstein, J. (Eds.) The Future of Evidence: How Science and Technology Will Change the Practice of Law. Chicago: American Bar Association, 33-76. Bingham, L.B. (2010). “The Next Generation of Administrative Law: Building the Infrastructure for Collaborative Governance”. University of Wisconsin Law Review, 2010 volume, 297-356. Bivens v. Six Unnamed Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1971), 403 U.S. 388. Boyd, C.L. (2013) “She’ll Settle It?”. Journal of Law and Courts, Vol. 1, 193-219. Trial:
Dzeguze%20WPSA%20Paper.docx