as proposed in doc . Graham "...and shall respect the condition Replace cited text with "in Revised agree – defined in Equation". I can't find accordance with Equation" with the comment. any other use of this expression in Make the changes 11md or this document. Replace as proposed in doc . Graham Equation 27-3 indicates that the Replace with = Rejected one Γëñ – Smith TX power may be less than the must ask and simple rule and could, in fact, be answer the set to zero. Seems pretty dumb to following question: me to have the < sign there as it is what are the bad enough already and can one consequences of a really see devices using less than STA using a TXP the permitted power if they were value less than dumb enough to do this anyway? what is permitted? Is it a net positive or negative for the individual STA, and is it a net positive or negative for the system? Unless someone knows the answer to that question, a proposal to disallow TXP below the maximum computed value cannot be considered. One argument to be made is that any action that causes a net increase in hidden nodes must be bad and therefore should be avoided, but this delta positive gain must be weighed against the gain of the feature, and again, the value of delta is unknown and should a problem arise, the feature can be tailored/tapered or otherwise adjusted later when such information is known. Graham "PHY-CCARE-SET.request" should Replace Rejected can’t – Smith be "PHY-CCARESET.request" with "PHY-CCARESET.request" find any Yusuke 292. "TX_PWR" should be "TXPWR" As commented. Revised agree – Tanaka with the comment on the
as proposed in doc . Graham "...and shall respect the condition defined in Equation". I can't find any other use of this expression in 11md or this document. Replace Replace cited text with "in accordance with Equation" Revised – agree with the comment. Make the changes as proposed in doc . Graham Smith Equation 27-3 indicates that the TX power may be less than the simple rule and could, in fact, be set to zero. Seems pretty dumb to me to have the < sign there as it is bad enough already and can one really see devices using less than the permitted power if they were dumb enough to do this anyway? Replace Γëñ with = Rejected – one must ask and answer the following question: what are the consequences of a STA using a TXP value less than what is permitted? Is it a net positive or negative for the individual STA, and is it a net positive or negative for the system? Unless someone knows the answer to that question, a proposal to disallow TXP below the maximum computed value cannot be considered. One argument to be made is that any action that causes a net increase in hidden nodes must be bad and therefore should be avoided, but this delta positive gain must be weighed against the gain of the feature, and again, the value of delta is unknown and should a problem arise, the feature can be tailored/tapered or otherwise adjusted later when such information is known. Graham Smith "PHY-CCARE-SET.request" should be "PHY-CCARESET.request" Replace with "PHY-CCARESET.request" Rejected – can’t find any Yusuke Tanaka "TX_PWR" should be "TXPWR" As commented. Revised – agree with the comment on the 292.
11-17-1852-06-00ax-cr-for-27-9.docx