prevention activities against the three diseases beyond GF investments Establish the extent to which GF Round 8 HSS grant has strengthened health facility based and community based referral/service networks that benefit the vulnerable groups Client perspective of the services offered by GF R8 HSS supported health facilities and communities PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Have the community Comparison of the actual Desk review of Strategic and Sampling of districts to be Content analysis and health approach program results against the program documents grant documents decided upon during interpretation of interventions been targets prescribed in the and reports as in No. 1 Above. development of protocol qualitative findings implemented as Project Theory of Review the baseline District annual and data collection tools Analysis of performance intended? change/M&E and periodic performance and after budgetary trends (routine HMIS Adherence to work Plan/Performance performance reports including considerations and program/grant plan: service package, framework (annually) information collected HMIS (Plus DQA Sampling of Lower levels targets) in the sampled delivery approaches Compare access and quarterly and annually where necessary) and health facilities will districts and adherence to utilization of services - pre against the project for major be done to achieve a national and post Project theory of change and indicators balance between the guidelines/procedures, intervention M&E/Performance Key informants districts and between target populations and Analytic description of the Framework from the good and poor subgroups factors that hindered or Key informant Headquarters, performing health facilitated the achievement interviews as District Field staff, facilities and of program results SWOT analysis District leaders, communities. Describe lessons learnt and disease focal best practices persons, Health Suggest relevant facility staffs, recommendations Community Health Workers) Is there adequate Compare the actual Desk review of capacity/skills among program results against the program documents the CHW cadre targets prescribed in the and reports
prevention activities against the three diseases beyond GF investments Establish the extent to which GF Round 8 HSS grant has strengthened health facility based and community based referral/service networks that benefit the vulnerable groups Client perspective of the services offered by GF R8 HSS supported health facilities and communities PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION Have the community health approach interventions been implemented as intended? Adherence to work plan: service package, delivery approaches and adherence to national guidelines/procedures, target populations and subgroups Comparison of the actual program results against the targets prescribed in the Project Theory of change/M&E Plan/Performance framework (annually) Compare access and utilization of services - pre and post Project intervention Analytic description of the factors that hindered or facilitated the achievement of program results Describe lessons learnt and best practices Suggest relevant recommendations Desk review of program documents and reports Review the baseline and periodic performance information collected quarterly and annually against the project theory of change and M&E/Performance Framework Key informant interviews as SWOT analysis Strategic and grant documents as in No. 1 Above. District annual performance reports including HMIS (Plus DQA where necessary) for major indicators Key informants from the Headquarters, District Field staff, District leaders, disease focal persons, Health facility staffs, Community Health Workers) Sampling of districts to be decided upon during development of protocol and data collection tools and after budgetary considerations Sampling of Lower levels and health facilities will be done to achieve a balance between the districts and between good and poor performing health facilities and communities. Content analysis and interpretation of qualitative findings Analysis of performance trends (routine HMIS and program/grant targets) in the sampled districts Is there adequate capacity/skills among the CHW cadre Compare the actual program results against the targets prescribed in the Desk review of program documents and reports
CSS%20Evaluation%20Report%20(Revised%20Edition-August%202012).docx