Discussion: VHT TXOP PS bit field has two different interpretations depending on the type of the transmitter. The encoding of VHT TXOP PS bit should be different for AP and STA. But, it is not necessary to include the referene to frames. Proposed Resolution: Accepted. No change is needed. Because it was already reflected in IEEE 802.11ac 3.1 CID Commenter Clause Page Comment Proposed Resolution Number Change 6252 Hart 8.4.2.160.2 79.17 We have a of Replace BFer by Revise VHT/MU/HT/SU/SU-only SU BFer (=SU or BFer/BFee definitions, but MU BFer)/VHT all too often we don't use BFer as them, creatig potential appropriate, here ambiguity when 11ac is and elsewhere in inserted into 802.11. the that BFer appears in unmodified form. Ditto BFee => VHT BFee/SU BFee Discussion: It is not esay to select the correct terminology for beamformer and beamformee. Because a bunch of VHT/MU/HT/SU/SU-only BFer/BFee are defined. For making a consistency, it is encouraged to submit comments throughout all draft. And, those comments are totally editorial. Proposed Resolution: Rejected. CID Commenter Clause Page Comment Proposed Resolution Number Change 6255 Hart 8.4.2.160.3 81.29 Rounding should be defined Moving any Rejected in clause 8, not elsewhere rounding language to clause 8. Ditto for P81L43 Discussion: Commenter confused the clause number of the comment. The corresponding sentence is written in clause 8. Proposed Resolution: Rejected.
Discussion: VHT TXOP PS bit field has two different interpretations depending on the type of the transmitter. The encoding of VHT TXOP PS bit should be different for AP and STA. But, it is not necessary to include the referene to frames. Proposed Resolution: Accepted. No change is needed. Because it was already reflected in IEEE 802.11ac 3.1 CID Commenter Clause Number Page Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6252 Hart 8.4.2.160.2 79.17 We have a of VHT/MU/HT/SU/SU-only BFer/BFee definitions, but all too often we don't use them, creatig potential ambiguity when 11ac is inserted into 802.11. Replace BFer by SU BFer (=SU or MU BFer)/VHT BFer as appropriate, here and elsewhere in the that BFer appears in unmodified form. Ditto BFee => VHT BFee/SU BFee Revise Discussion: It is not esay to select the correct terminology for beamformer and beamformee. Because a bunch of VHT/MU/HT/SU/SU-only BFer/BFee are defined. For making a consistency, it is encouraged to submit comments throughout all draft. And, those comments are totally editorial. Proposed Resolution: Rejected. CID Commenter Clause Number Page Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6255 Hart 8.4.2.160.3 81.29 Rounding should be defined in clause 8, not elsewhere Moving any rounding language to clause 8. Ditto for P81L43 Rejected Discussion: Commenter confused the clause number of the comment. The corresponding sentence is written in clause 8. Proposed Resolution: Rejected.
11-12-0864-02-00ac-lb188-clause-8-4-2-comment-resolutions.docx