but if it access were millions of known, documents should be under a full included. Guano Puts the disclosure emphasis on the trial The receiving documents disclosure were only to decide potentially what it all relevant, means… and the and if they BCCA miss overturned something, the BCSC, oh well, by stating they had that the full discovery disclosure rule cannot so its their “authorize own fault. a search” to Clearly determine Guano relevance. be are a absolutely product of ridiculous their time, and the 1800s, inefficient, where huge costs, people had if you had a lot less to just documents produce than they everything do now. on full Guano scale everytime Also now, there is so much more emphasis on ethics in the profession, so is being put on the disclosing party to ensure that
but if it were known, should be included. Puts the emphasis on the receiving disclosure to decide what it all means… and if they miss something, oh well, they had full disclosure so its their own fault. Clearly Guano are a product of their time, the 1800s, where people had a lot less documents than they do now. access millions of documents under a full Guano disclosure The documents were only potentially relevant, and the BCCA overturned the BCSC, by stating that the discovery rule cannot “authorize a search” to determine relevance. be absolutely ridiculous and inefficient, huge costs, if you had to just produce everything on full Guano scale everytime Also now, there is so much more emphasis on ethics in the profession, so is being put on the disclosing party to ensure that trial
115-Thomson-_Law_307-Final.docx