Table 2: Reported participant demongraphics across all included studies. Gender Relationship – Age Ethnicity Eduation Employment male/female % status (1) Beroccal et al, 28.8% / 71.2 m = 34.5, SD 16.1 All caucasian 89.3% high school Not reported Not reported 2009 or above (2) Bilotta et al, 61% / 39% m = 33.42, SD 11.89 Not reported Not reported 64% collar’, Not reported ‘blue 2015 16% 8% undergrads, 12% employed (3) Landstra et al, 100% / 0% m = 51, SD = 9 Not reported Tertiary education 51% full-time 49% in a 2013 or above = 64% employment relationship, 75% long term (> 5 years) (4) Losada et al, 21.7% / 78.3% m = 61.73, SD 14.89 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 2014 (5) Mennin et al, 27% / 73% m = 19.52, SD 3.32 40% caucasian, 33% N/A undergrad N/A undergrad 97% single and – – 2005 African American, student sample student sample never married. 13% American, 4% Latino, 10% mixed heritage
Table 2: Reported participant demongraphics across all included studies. Gender – male/female % Age Ethnicity Eduation Employment Relationship status (1) Beroccal et al, 2009 28.8% / 71.2 m = 34.5, SD 16.1 All caucasian 89.3% high school or above Not reported Not reported (2) Bilotta et al, 2015 61% / 39% m = 33.42, SD 11.89 Not reported Not reported 64% ‘blue collar’, 16% 8% undergrads, 12% employed Not reported (3) Landstra et al, 2013 100% / 0% m = 51, SD = 9 Not reported Tertiary education or above = 64% 51% full-time employment 49% in a relationship, 75% long term (> 5 years) (4) Losada et al, 2014 21.7% / 78.3% m = 61.73, SD 14.89 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported (5) Mennin et al, 2005 27% / 73% m = 19.52, SD 3.32 40% caucasian, 33% African American, 13% American, 4% Latino, 10% mixed heritage N/A – undergrad student sample N/A – undergrad student sample 97% single and never married.
E-Thesis%20-%20Bryony%20Fairhurst.docx