8310 Wang, 151.22 A STA could transmit Change the sentence Accept multiple TWT requests "The receipt of a TWT for multiple TWT flows. response with a TWT However, the most Group Assignment recently received TWT field with no Zero response with Offset of the Group ( a prior subfield implies that response) may be of a the Zero Offset of the different group ID x Group subfield value than the group ID y of for that TWT is the the TWT response same as the Zero without zero-offset Offset of the Group (currently received subfield value for the response). In this most recently received case, STA should not Zero Offset of the use the zero-offset of Group subfield from group ID x as the the TWT Responding for group ID y. STA." into "The receipt of a TWT response with a TWT Group Assignment field with no Zero Offset of the Group subfield implies that the Zero Offset of the Group subfield value for that TWT is the same as the Zero Offset of the Group subfield value for the most recently received Zero Offset of the Group subfield for the same TWT group ID from the TWT Responding STA." 8311 Wang, 9.44.3 If TWT responding change the Reject the existing 299.59 – STA sends the Next requirement to text already covers the TWT value via optional if suggested. First, STACK/BAT/TACK as BAT/TACK/STACK if, in response to the described in L28~L39, are sent to respond to receipt of the frame then "the TWT a PPDU containing soliciting a response responding STA shall TWT information that contains a Next queue for transmission frame TWT value, the a TWT Information responding STA frame that contains a happens to send a nonzero Next TWT BAT or TACK or value..." requirement STACK, then in that is not necessary. case, the condition that follows is immediately satisfied, a TWT that is: “If requesting STA has transmitted a frame soliciting a response that contains a Next TWT value and the
8310 Wang, 151.22 A STA could transmit multiple TWT requests for multiple TWT flows. However, the most recently received TWT response with ( a prior response) may be of a different group ID x than the group ID y of the TWT response without zero-offset (currently received response). In this case, STA should not use the zero-offset of group ID x as the for group ID y. Change the sentence "The receipt of a TWT response with a TWT Group Assignment field with no Zero Offset of the Group subfield implies that the Zero Offset of the Group subfield value for that TWT is the same as the Zero Offset of the Group subfield value for the most recently received Zero Offset of the Group subfield from the TWT Responding STA." into "The receipt of a TWT response with a TWT Group Assignment field with no Zero Offset of the Group subfield implies that the Zero Offset of the Group subfield value for that TWT is the same as the Zero Offset of the Group subfield value for the most recently received Zero Offset of the Group subfield for the same TWT group ID from the TWT Responding STA." Accept 8311 Wang, 299.59 9.44.3 If TWT responding STA sends the Next TWT value via STACK/BAT/TACK as described in L28~L39, then "the TWT responding STA shall queue for transmission a TWT Information frame that contains a nonzero Next TWT value..." requirement is not necessary. change the requirement to optional if BAT/TACK/STACK are sent to respond to a PPDU containing TWT information frame Reject – the existing text already covers the suggested. First, if, in response to the receipt of the frame soliciting a response that contains a Next TWT value, the responding STA happens to send a BAT or TACK or STACK, then in that case, the condition that follows is immediately satisfied, that is: “If a TWT requesting STA has transmitted a frame soliciting a response that contains a Next TWT value and the
11-16-0063-00-00ah-lb215-twt-cids-proposed-resolutions.docx