Section 3.15, Question 4: Meets Requirements If confidential information is posted in the Bidder’s Library and “Yes,” Deficiencies appropriate security and access controls are in place that meet security and legal standards. If no confidential information is anticipated to be posted to the “No,” Bidder’s Library. For Section 3.15, the Agency/state entity has identified the scoring and point Meets Requirements distribution breakdown for each evaluation area relevant to the Agency/state entity’s Deficiencies requirements, consistent with the STPD Solicitation template, Scoring and Point Distribution sample in SIMM 195. Section 3.15, Question 5: Meets Requirements If the evaluation methodology, points and/or approach has been “Yes,” Deficiencies validated and tested. If testing or validation of evaluation methodology is not required. “No,” Section 3.15, Question 6: Meets Requirements If the bidder and key staff qualifications and references have been “Yes,” Deficiencies provided and validated. If the bidder and key staff qualifications and references are in progress “No,” and must be provided prior to the release of the solicitation. If the bidder and key staff qualifications and references are not “N/A,” required. Section 3.15 Question 7: Requirements If the documentation substantiates that all key stakeholders (executive “Yes,” Deficiencies sponsors, business and IT project team, and procurement team) are knowledgeable and committed to the evaluation methodology for the solicitation. If key stakeholder knowledge and commitment to the evaluation “No,” methodology must be validated prior to solicitation release. Section 3.15, Question 8: Meets Requirements If the Agency/state entity provided a complete plan (i.e., demo script, “Yes,” Deficiencies pre-defined set of questions, pass/fail and/or scoring criteria). If bidder demonstrations are not required. “No,” Section 3.15, Question 9: Meets Requirements If all applicable changes (e.g., changes to the solution requirements, “Yes,” Deficiencies cost worksheets, evaluation methodology, terms, SOW) have been described and are included in the solicitation package as a result of the STPD Process. If the documentation validates that no changes were made as a result “No,” of the Pre-Solicitation Process. 3.16 Public contract Code (PCC) 6611 Readiness
Section 3.15, Question 4: If “Yes,” confidential information is posted in the Bidder’s Library and appropriate security and access controls are in place that meet security and legal standards. If “No,” no confidential information is anticipated to be posted to the Bidder’s Library. Meets Requirements Deficiencies For Section 3.15, the Agency/state entity has identified the scoring and point distribution breakdown for each evaluation area relevant to the Agency/state entity’s requirements, consistent with the STPD Solicitation template, Scoring and Point Distribution sample in SIMM 195. Meets Requirements Deficiencies Section 3.15, Question 5: If “Yes,” the evaluation methodology, points and/or approach has been validated and tested. If “No,” testing or validation of evaluation methodology is not required. Meets Requirements Deficiencies Section 3.15, Question 6: If “Yes,” the bidder and key staff qualifications and references have been provided and validated. If “No,” the bidder and key staff qualifications and references are in progress and must be provided prior to the release of the solicitation. If “N/A,” the bidder and key staff qualifications and references are not required. Meets Requirements Deficiencies Section 3.15 Question 7: If “Yes,” the documentation substantiates that all key stakeholders (executive sponsors, business and IT project team, and procurement team) are knowledgeable and committed to the evaluation methodology for the solicitation. If “No,” key stakeholder knowledge and commitment to the evaluation methodology must be validated prior to solicitation release. Requirements Deficiencies Section 3.15, Question 8: If “Yes,” the Agency/state entity provided a complete plan (i.e., demo script, pre-defined set of questions, pass/fail and/or scoring criteria). If “No,” bidder demonstrations are not required. Meets Requirements Deficiencies Section 3.15, Question 9: If “Yes,” all applicable changes (e.g., changes to the solution requirements, cost worksheets, evaluation methodology, terms, SOW) have been described and are included in the solicitation package as a result of the STPD Process. If “No,” the documentation validates that no changes were made as a result of the Pre-Solicitation Process. Meets Requirements Deficiencies 3.16 Public contract Code (PCC) 6611 Readiness
C_8_Stage_3_Evaluation_Scorecard_Part_B.docx