Rubric: DOCTOR NEULANDER CASE: ARGUMENTATIVE 3D MODEL Points 8-6 5-3 2-1 Informative about blood spatter The model illustrates and The model is somewhat The model demonstrates knowledge references 3 appropriate evidence informative about blood about 1 appropriate blood spatter blood spatter patterns spatter analysis. It references patterns and 1 appropriate properties of and references 3 2 appropriate blood spatter blood. Does not reference appropriate properties of patterns and 2 appropriate evidence/information the case References actual properties of blood. presented by 48 hours. evidence and information Somewhat references from the case presented by 48 hours. evidence/information the case presented by 48 hours Communication on placard Communication was clear, Communication lacked some Communication was disorganized, a succinct, provided a detailed polish, did not illustrate an lack of research is evident based on description illustrates a keen understanding of their vague communication or did not reflect understanding of the research research and did not convey a deep understanding of the topic. No and reflects analytical thinking. student thinking clearly. logical conclusions are drawn Logical conclusions are drawn. Somewhat logical conclusions are drawn. Originality The work is unique and ideas The work is somewhat The work is not unique and no illustrate independent thinking. unique and ideas illustrate independent thinking is demonstrated. some independent thinking. Visual Aesthetic Detailed, visually appealing, Somewhat organized, Zero organization. neat, easy to understand and somewhat visually appealing well organized. and somewhat easy to understand. Total out of 32
Rubric: DOCTOR NEULANDER CASE: ARGUMENTATIVE 3D MODEL Points 8-6 5-3 2-1 Informative about blood spatter evidence The model illustrates and references 3 appropriate blood spatter patterns and references 3 appropriate properties of References actual evidence and information from the case presented by 48 hours. The model is somewhat informative about blood spatter analysis. It references 2 appropriate blood spatter patterns and 2 appropriate properties of blood. Somewhat references evidence/information the case presented by 48 hours The model demonstrates knowledge about 1 appropriate blood spatter patterns and 1 appropriate properties of blood. Does not reference evidence/information the case presented by 48 hours. Communication on placard Communication was clear, succinct, provided a detailed description illustrates a keen understanding of the research and reflects analytical thinking. Logical conclusions are drawn. Communication lacked some polish, did not illustrate an understanding of their research and did not convey student thinking clearly. Somewhat logical conclusions are drawn. Communication was disorganized, a lack of research is evident based on vague communication or did not reflect a deep understanding of the topic. No logical conclusions are drawn Originality The work is unique and ideas illustrate independent thinking. The work is somewhat unique and ideas illustrate some independent thinking. The work is not unique and no independent thinking is demonstrated. Visual Aesthetic Detailed, visually appealing, neat, easy to understand and well organized. Somewhat organized, somewhat visually appealing and somewhat easy to understand. Zero organization. Total out of 32
doctor_neulander_modeling_project.docx