whatever format you Other format/way used to map have followed) with user needs to design users and experts. requirements; please provide reference and short description: Verification of use cases or other with users and experts; please provide short info (where, how, with how many and which type of users and experts): No Use Cases, conceptual models or other format has been used to map user needs to design requirements; explain why: 3 Following your This is a necessary follow-up in order to ensure ethics compliant development Conduct of evaluation; please Please specify how requirements mapped with and ensure that users (all types, addressed directly and indirectly) will be define type: many iterations you Personas (see previous involved from the first phase of design until the final release of the solution. have foreseen and issues), please design and Iteration evaluation framework provide a short and schedule your evaluation in the AEGIS UCD plan, the Phase 3: Concept to Working and experimental plans built; concise experimental “From with users and experts in Prototype” and Phase 4: Field trials” proposes a series of approaches to please provide it in short, plan, which will make “ an iterative matter and proceed from quick & dirty testing to HiFi Prototype redesign (see D1.1.1, responding also the following: obvious the validity and upon concise experimental downlodable from the web site, or above figure for a quick overview). strength of your plans, defining specific Iterative nature; evaluation and the research hypotheses, Please make sure that the users that you will involve will satisfy your Personas please define number approaches that you targets, evaluation (or user profiles) and that the evaluation tasks/scenarios will be in compliance and type of iterations: will encompass approaches and with your previously built conceptual models, use cases and scenarios. providing a reasoning. measuring tools and Representation of success thresholds for Please also make sure that besides experts, you need to involve in the targeted users each phase. In each evaluation indirect stakeholders (i.e. tutors, carers, etc.) as well as experts in the (satisfaction of iteration, the level of field through focus groups and interviews. Personas/user maturity of the solution profiles); please towards evaluation should
Other format/way used to map user needs to design requirements; please provide reference and short description: Verification of use cases or other with users and experts; please provide short info (where, how, with how many and which type of users and experts): No Use Cases, conceptual models or other format has been used to map user needs to design requirements; explain why: whatever format you have followed) with users and experts. 3 Following your requirements mapped with Personas (see previous issues), please design and schedule your evaluation with users and experts in an iterative matter and upon concise experimental plans, defining specific research hypotheses, targets, evaluation approaches and measuring tools and success thresholds for each phase. In each iteration, the level of maturity of the solution towards evaluation should This is a necessary follow-up in order to ensure ethics compliant development and ensure that users (all types, addressed directly and indirectly) will be involved from the first phase of design until the final release of the solution. in the AEGIS UCD plan, the Phase 3: “From Concept to Working Prototype” and Phase 4: “ Field trials” proposes a series of approaches to proceed from quick & dirty testing to HiFi Prototype redesign (see D1.1.1, downlodable from the web site, or above figure for a quick overview). Please make sure that the users that you will involve will satisfy your Personas (or user profiles) and that the evaluation tasks/scenarios will be in compliance with your previously built conceptual models, use cases and scenarios. Please also make sure that besides experts, you need to involve in the evaluation indirect stakeholders (i.e. tutors, carers, etc.) as well as experts in the field through focus groups and interviews. Conduct of evaluation; please define type: Iteration evaluation framework and experimental plans built; please provide it in short, responding also the following: Iterative nature; please define number and type of iterations: Representation of targeted users (satisfaction of Personas/user profiles); please Please specify how many iterations you have foreseen and provide a short and concise experimental plan, which will make obvious the validity and strength of your evaluation and the approaches that you will encompass providing a reasoning.
Developers_Checklist_for_ethics_compliant_products_and_services.docx