Criteria Source(s) of Evidence Assessment Sustained Scholarly that there are different levels of prestige in scholarly Activity: Scholarly activities, candidates will choose one of the two options activities are based on listed as A and B below. lines of inquiry consistently conducted at *Note: Candidates may opt to mix and match their yearly Shawnee State University activities from A and B within their given promotion/tenure throughout the review runs. (e.g. one year a candidate may opt for B and another period or within the past year choose A, etc.) five years A. Average a combination of two of the following scholarly activities in each academic year at SSU: 1) Presentations given to academic organizations at state or regional conferences 2) Presentations given to the campus community Met 3) Published book reviews (or having these accepted for publication) Not Met 4) Reference entries published in scholarly professional books or journals (or having these accepted for publication) 5) Offices or positions held in professional academic organizations or on scholarly editorial boards (not used as evidence of service) 7) Organized and chaired sessions at state or regional conferences 8) Invited address at academic gatherings 9) Obtaining external grants or similar financial support for research or scholarly activity Average one of the following scholarly activities in each B. academic year at SSU: 1) Presentations given to academic organizations at competitive prestigious national or international conferences 2) Published book chapters or conference proceedings with respectable academic presses (or having these accepted for publication) Met 3) Published articles or essay reviews in scholarly professional journals or books (or having these accepted for Not Met publication)
Criteria Source(s) of Evidence Assessment Sustained Scholarly Activity: Scholarly activities are based on lines of inquiry consistently conducted at Shawnee State University throughout the review period or within the past five years that there are different levels of prestige in scholarly activities, candidates will choose one of the two options listed as A and B below. *Note: Candidates may opt to mix and match their yearly activities from A and B within their given promotion/tenure runs. (e.g. one year a candidate may opt for B and another year choose A, etc.) A. Average a combination of two of the following scholarly activities in each academic year at SSU: 1) Presentations given to academic organizations at state or regional conferences 2) Presentations given to the campus community 3) Published book reviews (or having these accepted for publication) 4) Reference entries published in scholarly professional books or journals (or having these accepted for publication) 5) Offices or positions held in professional academic organizations or on scholarly editorial boards (not used as evidence of service) 7) Organized and chaired sessions at state or regional conferences 8) Invited address at academic gatherings 9) Obtaining external grants or similar financial support for research or scholarly activity B. Average one of the following scholarly activities in each academic year at SSU: 1) Presentations given to academic organizations at competitive prestigious national or international conferences 2) Published book chapters or conference proceedings with respectable academic presses (or having these accepted for publication) 3) Published articles or essay reviews in scholarly professional journals or books (or having these accepted for publication) Met Not Met Met Not Met
Draft-EH-Scholarship-Criteria-Evaluation-Assessment-Grid-English-Substantial.docx