that are marked with CID 5179 5180 Dorothy Regarding "An AP Allow DL Revised- Stanley shall not transmit to a MIMO with STA an HE MU HE MU Agree in principle. PPDU with the PPDU to HE allocating STAs that do Agree in principle. Per spatial streams to not support proposed resolution of CID more than one partial 4804, this sentence will be recipient STA, unless bandwidth. removed. the STA sets the Downlink MU-MIMO TGax editor makes changes On Partial Bandwidth as shown in 11-17/1286r0 Rx subfield of the HE that are marked with CID Capabilities element 5180 to 1.", what is the intent of not allowing DL MU-MIMO w/ HE MU PPDU if the STAs only support full bandwidth? Is the intent to use VHT PPDU? I would think in the future when all the devices are HE, we would not want a mix of VHT and HE PPDU's 5181 Dorothy I can't find a definition Define the Revised- Stanley 56 for "DL OFDMA With terms so the PPDU". I can't paragraph Agree in principle. Per find an HE makes proposed resolution of CID Capabilities element sense. 4804, this sentence will be with "DL OFDMA removed. With MIMO Support" field. TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 5181. 5182 Dorothy Regarding "The STA as in Revised- Stanley that receives a BQRP comment variant Trigger frame Agree in principle. A non-AP shall follow the rules STA can use UL defined in 27.5.2.3 random access only if (STA behavior) to it claims the capability (i.e. set generate the HE OFDMA RA Supports bit in trigger-based PPDU HE MAC Capabilites to 1). when the Trigger Proposes to add a qualifier in frame contains the the sentence to clarify. STA's AID in any of the Per User Info TGax editor changes as fields; otherwise the shown in 11-17/1286r0 that STA shall follow the are marked with CID 5182.
that are marked with CID 5179 5180 Dorothy Stanley Regarding "An AP shall not transmit to a STA an HE MU PPDU with the allocating spatial streams to more than one recipient STA, unless the STA sets the Downlink MU-MIMO On Partial Bandwidth Rx subfield of the HE Capabilities element to 1.", what is the intent of not allowing DL MU-MIMO w/ HE MU PPDU if the STAs only support full bandwidth? Is the intent to use VHT PPDU? I would think in the future when all the devices are HE, we would not want a mix of VHT and HE PPDU's Allow DL with HE MU PPDU to HE STAs that do not support partial bandwidth. Revised- Agree in principle. Agree in principle. Per proposed resolution of CID 4804, this sentence will be removed. TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 5180 5181 Dorothy Stanley I can't find a definition for "DL OFDMA With PPDU". I can't find an HE Capabilities element with "DL OFDMA With MIMO Support" field. Define the terms so the paragraph makes sense. Revised- Agree in principle. Per proposed resolution of CID 4804, this sentence will be removed. TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 5181. 5182 Dorothy Stanley Regarding "The STA that receives a BQRP variant Trigger frame shall follow the rules defined in 27.5.2.3 (STA behavior) to generate the HE trigger-based PPDU when the Trigger frame contains the STA's AID in any of the Per User Info fields; otherwise the STA shall follow the as in comment Revised- Agree in principle. A non-AP STA can use UL random access only if it claims the capability (i.e. set OFDMA RA Supports bit in HE MAC Capabilites to 1). Proposes to add a qualifier in the sentence to clarify. TGax editor changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 5182. MIMO 56
11-17-1286-00-00ax-cr-dl-mu-procedure.docx