16888 802.19 comment Add analysis of Rejected from Benjamin Rolfe: coexistence with The CAD does not services based on This is not a comment on the draft discuss coexistence in 802.15.4 using the amendment, however with respect to the CA bands other than 2.4 LRP and HRP UWB document: GHz and 5 GHz, PHYs in all bands other than when where 802.11ax and The IEEE 802 describing the PAR 802.15.4 UWB LMSC OPERATIONS MANUAL states as scope. In Clause 2 it PHYs overlap. follows "The CA document shall address explicitly says coexistence with all relevant approved IEEE "Therefore 802.11ax 802 LMSC wireless will be an standards specifying devices for unlicensed enhancement to operation. The WG should consider other 802.11n in 2.4 GHz specifications in their identified target and 802.11ac in 5 band(s) in the CA document." GHz" but this is not consistent with the 802.11 coexistence with non-802.11 project scope as systems is addressed in Section 3 of the CA identified in clause 1. document. There is no LMSC requirement There are devices for analysis or simulation or testing. implementing 802.15.4 operating in CA document has been amended to the band above 6 acknowledge UWB with the relevant GHz using the LRP regulations. Refer to and HRP UWN PHYs. The entire scope of 802.11ax is within the scope of the CAD, not just 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz operation.
16888 802.19 comment from Benjamin Rolfe: The CAD does not discuss coexistence in bands other than 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, other than when describing the PAR scope. In Clause 2 it explicitly says "Therefore 802.11ax will be an enhancement to 802.11n in 2.4 GHz and 802.11ac in 5 GHz" but this is not consistent with the project scope as identified in clause 1. There are devices implementing 802.15.4 operating in the band above 6 GHz using the LRP and HRP UWN PHYs. The entire scope of 802.11ax is within the scope of the CAD, not just 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz operation. Add analysis of coexistence with services based on 802.15.4 using the LRP and HRP UWB PHYs in all bands where 802.11ax and 802.15.4 UWB PHYs overlap. Rejected This is not a comment on the draft amendment, however with respect to the CA document: The IEEE 802 LMSC OPERATIONS MANUAL states as follows "The CA document shall address coexistence with all relevant approved IEEE 802 LMSC wireless standards specifying devices for unlicensed operation. The WG should consider other specifications in their identified target band(s) in the CA document." 802.11 coexistence with non-802.11 systems is addressed in Section 3 of the CA document. There is no LMSC requirement for analysis or simulation or testing. CA document has been amended to acknowledge UWB with the relevant regulations. Refer to
11-18-1532-01-00ax-tgax-coexistence-assurance-document-comments.docx