CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 9061 The reason given for Remove all changes to the Rejected- rejecting i-437 asserts 802.11 MAC contained in that the BRC has no idea this amendment. Delete TGah BRC reviewed the what is MAC functionality clauses 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and sub-clause 11.50 (S1G and what is MAC service 12 from this draft BSS operation) to find interface. This reinforces amendment. inappropriate texts in the commenters assertion MLME clause. that there is inappropriate text in the and that But, the BRC can not the change is inconsistent identify which operation with the base standard. is considered as the MAC functionality. 11.50 (S1G BSS operation) is describing the BSS operation and almost texts are well aligned with the reference sections, 10.40 (VHT BSS operation) and 10.43 (Basic TVHT BSS functionality) of 802.11 base specification. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 9062 The reason given for Remove all changes to the Rejected- rejecting i-436 asserts 802.11 MAC contained in that the BRC has no idea this amendment. Delete TGah BRC reviewed the what is MAC functionality clauses 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and sub-clause 11.49 and what is MAC service 12 from this (System information interface. This reinforces amendment. update procedure) to find the commenters assertion inappropriate texts in that there is inappropriate MLME clause. text in the clause and that the change is inconsistent But, the BRC can not with the base standard. identify operation is considered as the MAC functionality. 10.49 (System information update procedure) is describing the system information update mechanism and almost texts are well aligned with the reference section, 10.2.2.17 (TIM
CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 9061 The reason given for rejecting i-437 asserts that the BRC has no idea what is MAC functionality and what is MAC service interface. This reinforces the commenters assertion that there is inappropriate text in the and that the change is inconsistent with the base standard. Remove all changes to the 802.11 MAC contained in this amendment. Delete clauses 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12 from this draft amendment. Rejected- TGah BRC reviewed the sub-clause 11.50 (S1G BSS operation) to find inappropriate texts in MLME clause. But, the BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. 11.50 (S1G BSS operation) is describing the BSS operation and almost texts are well aligned with the reference sections, 10.40 (VHT BSS operation) and 10.43 (Basic TVHT BSS functionality) of 802.11 base specification. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 9062 The reason given for rejecting i-436 asserts that the BRC has no idea what is MAC functionality and what is MAC service interface. This reinforces the commenters assertion that there is inappropriate text in the clause and that the change is inconsistent with the base standard. Remove all changes to the 802.11 MAC contained in this amendment. Delete clauses 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12 from this amendment. Rejected- TGah BRC reviewed the sub-clause 11.49 (System information update procedure) to find inappropriate texts in MLME clause. But, the BRC can not identify operation is considered as the MAC functionality. 10.49 (System information update procedure) is describing the system information update mechanism and almost texts are well aligned with the reference section, 10.2.2.17 (TIM
11-16-0453-00-00ah-sb1-comment-resolution-part4.docx