-18 June 2015 PM2 REVmc BRC at Intel Jones Farm office Hillsboro, Oregon – – Called to order at 3:30pm PT by Dorothy STANLEY (HP) Review Patent Policy No issues identified. Attendance: Dorothy STANLEY (HP), Adrian STEPHENS Emily QI (Intel), Edward AU (Marvel); Jon ROSDAHL (CSR); Mark RISON (Samsung); Dan HARKINS (HP); Youhan KIM (Qualcomm); Dick ROY(SRA); Review Agenda: 11-15/744r4() Security CIDS Review 11-15/763 () Dan HARKINS CID 6507 (MAC) Review Comment HMAC convention question Discussion on the reason for having the HMAC-MD5 Proposed Resolution: Revised; change it to construction “The of descriptors for uses of the SHA family of hash functions…” More discussion on what format the should be in. What is HMAC-MD5? Normative reference B26 (2640) – Question on if we use IETF RFC 2104 terminology? Two opinions are colliding – The Proposed change uses but should be “descriptors” “description”. Update the Proposed Resolution: Revised; change it to construction of descriptions for uses of the SHA family “The of hash functions…” Mark Ready for Motion CID 6349 (MAC) Review Comment Question on what is used with RSN? Discussion on the MESH use of RSN and GTKSA are different. Review 1926.22 of security associations by an RSNA – STA. Is the prefix needed for the Security types to see if it “Mesh” is different, so merging the terms would be a lot of work. Proposed Resolution: Revised Delete 13-16 on page – 103. 103.36 insert GTKSA, Mesh TKSA, and Mesh “Mesh PMKSA” after "(IGTKSA)" If pairwise master key security association (PMKSA) caching is not enabled, deauthentication also At 103.38 change the sentence to: If pairwise master key security association (PMKSA) caching
REVmc BRC at Intel Jones Farm office – Hillsboro, Oregon -18 June 2015 – PM2 Called to order at 3:30pm PT by Dorothy STANLEY (HP) Review Patent Policy No issues identified. Attendance: Dorothy STANLEY (HP), Adrian STEPHENS Emily QI (Intel), Edward AU (Marvel); Jon ROSDAHL (CSR); Mark RISON (Samsung); Dan HARKINS (HP); Youhan KIM (Qualcomm); Dick ROY(SRA); Review Agenda: 11-15/744r4() Security CIDS Review 11-15/763 () Dan HARKINS CID 6507 (MAC) Review Comment HMAC convention question Discussion on the reason for having the HMAC-MD5 Proposed Resolution: Revised; change it to “The construction of descriptors for uses of the SHA family of hash functions…” More discussion on what format the should be in. What is HMAC-MD5? – Normative reference B26 (2640) Question on if we use IETF RFC 2104 terminology? Two opinions are colliding – The Proposed change uses “descriptors” but should be “description”. Update the Proposed Resolution: Revised; change it to “The construction of descriptions for uses of the SHA family of hash functions…” Mark Ready for Motion CID 6349 (MAC) Review Comment Question on what is used with RSN? Discussion on the MESH use of RSN and GTKSA are different. Review 1926.22 – of security associations by an RSNA STA. Is the “Mesh” prefix needed for the Security types to see if it is different, so merging the terms would be a lot of work. Proposed Resolution: Revised – Delete 13-16 on page 103. 103.36 insert “Mesh GTKSA, Mesh TKSA, and Mesh PMKSA” after "(IGTKSA)" If pairwise master key security association (PMKSA) caching is not enabled, deauthentication also At 103.38 change the sentence to: If pairwise master key security association (PMKSA) caching
11-15-0742-01-000m-revmc-brc-minutes-for-june-portland.docx