C Activity design, This criterion assesses the Activity design and implementation approach, – methodology, risk as well as risk and compliance matters. and compliance (clauses 3 .7 and Applicants are requested to specifically address cybersecurity risks and the 3.8 of the ARP risk of network service performance disruptions in the Activity risks. Program Guidelines) You should refer to the ARP Guidelines for further information. D Financial This criterion assesses your financial capacity to deliver the Activity and – viability and co- whether the amount of ARENA funding sought and the total cost of the funding Activity are appropriate. You should refer to the ARP Guidelines for further commitment information. (clauses 3.9 and 3.10 of the ARP If you have received funding from any other government or regulatory Program sources (including under the Demand Management Incentive Scheme or Guidelines) Demand Management Innovation Allowance), you should demonstrate the need for additional funding from ARENA. E Knowledge This criterion assesses the knowledge generated by the Activity in – sharing (clauses contributing to the ARP Outcomes. 3.11 and 3.12 of the ARP Program You can demonstrate merit against this criterion by describing: Guidelines) the value of the knowledge expected to be generated by the Activity and its contribution to industry understanding of approaches to increase hosting capacity; how well that knowledge is targeted to specific audiences; and the extent to which knowledge or data obtained through the Activity will be shared publicly (for example through the or )
C – Activity design, methodology, risk and compliance (clauses 3 .7 and 3.8 of the ARP Program Guidelines) This criterion assesses the Activity design and implementation approach, as well as risk and compliance matters. Applicants are requested to specifically address cybersecurity risks and the risk of network service performance disruptions in the Activity risks. You should refer to the ARP Guidelines for further information. D – Financial viability and co- funding commitment (clauses 3.9 and 3.10 of the ARP Program Guidelines) This criterion assesses your financial capacity to deliver the Activity and whether the amount of ARENA funding sought and the total cost of the Activity are appropriate. You should refer to the ARP Guidelines for further information. If you have received funding from any other government or regulatory sources (including under the Demand Management Incentive Scheme or Demand Management Innovation Allowance), you should demonstrate the need for additional funding from ARENA. E – Knowledge sharing (clauses 3.11 and 3.12 of the ARP Program Guidelines) This criterion assesses the knowledge generated by the Activity in contributing to the ARP Outcomes. You can demonstrate merit against this criterion by describing: the value of the knowledge expected to be generated by the Activity and its contribution to industry understanding of approaches to increase hosting capacity; how well that knowledge is targeted to specific audiences; and the extent to which knowledge or data obtained through the Activity will be shared publicly (for example through the or )
der-funding-announcement-a.docx