this draft, delete the word "specified". 6470 96.23 9.4.2.223 Ambiguous langauge: Clarify. Duplicated: "The Vendor Specific CID 3041 Service ID indicates a specified operation, and the HE STA that supports it". Does "it" refer to the Vendor Specific Service ID field or the specified operation? 8204 96.23 9.4.2.223 what role does clarify Duplicated: "Vendor Specific CID 3041 Service Identifier" do? 3043 97.30 9.4.2.225 Quiet Time Period Remove fields (and : Response doesn't corresponding AP can need to carry all the description) between counter the fields in the Request - Dialog Token and request by it can simply carry a Status code having status code field to different indicate whether the values in the request was response successful Clauses 9.4.242.4 and 27.16.4.3 are revised to support the behaviour. 3045 97.48 9.4.2.225 There is no reason for Change status code to Revised: status code to be 2 1 octet field. Add a Agree with the octet long. Also table that define values suggestion. define possible values for status code - for The text is in and their meaning for example, 9.4.2.242.3 status code field for (0)success, status code (1)reject - requested period too long (2)reject - requested periodicity too long (3) so on.... 5341 97.49 9.4.2.225 The values for Status Define the values for Duplicated: Code are not defined Status Code CID 3045 4644 80.10 9.4.2.218.2 Add clarity and call Add bit "B33:" in Rejected: out bit position in Definition column This is a very 9-262z for before the word "The" good subfield "QTP Add bits "B33:" in suggestion. Support" Encoding column But in the corresponding to before the word "If" current table
this draft, delete the word "specified". 6470 96.23 9.4.2.223 Ambiguous langauge: "The Vendor Specific Service ID indicates a specified operation, and the HE STA that supports it". Does "it" refer to the Vendor Specific Service ID field or the specified operation? Clarify. Duplicated: CID 3041 8204 96.23 9.4.2.223 what role does "Vendor Specific Service Identifier" do? clarify Duplicated: CID 3041 3043 97.30 9.4.2.225 Quiet Time Period Response doesn't need to carry all the fields in the Request - it can simply carry a status code field to indicate whether the request was successful Remove fields (and corresponding description) between Dialog Token and Status code : AP can counter the request by having different values in the response Clauses 9.4.242.4 and 27.16.4.3 are revised to support the behaviour. 3045 97.48 9.4.2.225 There is no reason for status code to be 2 octet long. Also define possible values and their meaning for status code field for status code Change status code to 1 octet field. Add a table that define values for status code - for example, (0)success, (1)reject - requested period too long (2)reject - requested periodicity too long (3) so on.... Revised: Agree with the suggestion. The text is in 9.4.2.242.3 5341 97.49 9.4.2.225 The values for Status Code are not defined Define the values for Status Code Duplicated: CID 3045 4644 80.10 9.4.2.218.2 Add clarity and call out bit position in 9-262z for subfield "QTP Support" corresponding to Add bit "B33:" in Definition column before the word "The" Add bits "B33:" in Encoding column before the word "If" Rejected: This is a very good suggestion. But in the current table
11-17-1010-03-00ax-quiet-time-period-part-4-9-4-2-223-225.docx