conducting both types of evaluation Objectives addressed: #2: Use evidence of learning to identify need for change in instructional practice. #4: Select or design changes in current instructional practice, on professional knowledge, that are likely to improve learning Evaluative Strategies: Evaluating the Learners’ Levels of Mastery Read to identify and be able to … critique characteristics of … effective evaluative strategies Literature Review … and their alignment with specific learning contexts: Objectives addressed: In-class #5: Monitor learner Resources: Session 8 Apperson, Laws & Scepansky, progress formatively in 2006, 148-153 to make appropriate Angelo & March 13 adjustments. 1998, 88 Berk, 2002, 155-181 #6: Analyze results of the implemented change in Perrin & Reuter, Nilson, 2010, 273-294 instructional practice, in retrieved from order to draw justifiable Taylor & Littleton-Kearney, conclusions with a view to 2011, 84-88 appropriate next steps to continue improving teaching and learning. Evaluative Strategies: Instructional Read to relate recommended Evaluating the Quality of practices to own teaching Teaching experience in order to approve Develop ability to make In-class resources: experiences of learners: appropriate judgments about Arreola, 2006, strategies for evaluation of Berk, Naumann, & Appling, teaching: Session 9 2004, Article 10 Formative evaluation Felder & Brent, Course evaluation 2004, 200-202 March 20 Brownson, Fielding & Maylahn, Peer review 2009, 175-201 Kirschling, et al., Objectives addressed: 1995, 401-410 Elzubeir & Rizk, 2002, 313-319 #5: Monitor learner progress formatively in Nilson, 2010, Hatzipanagos & Lygo-Baker, order to make appropriate 2006, 97-105 adjustments.
conducting both types of evaluation Objectives addressed: #2: Use evidence of learning to identify need for change in instructional practice. #4: Select or design changes in current instructional practice, on professional knowledge, that are likely to improve learning Session 8 March 13 Evaluative Strategies: Evaluating the Learners’ Levels of Mastery … … … Objectives addressed: #5: Monitor learner progress formatively in to make appropriate adjustments. #6: Analyze results of the implemented change in instructional practice, in order to draw justifiable conclusions with a view to appropriate next steps to continue improving teaching and learning. Read to identify and be able to critique characteristics of effective evaluative strategies and their alignment with specific learning contexts: Apperson, Laws & Scepansky, 2006, 148-153 Berk, 2002, 155-181 Nilson, 2010, 273-294 Taylor & Littleton-Kearney, 2011, 84-88 Literature Review In-class Resources: Angelo & 1998, 88 Perrin & Reuter, retrieved from Session 9 March 20 Evaluative Strategies: Evaluating the Quality of Teaching Develop ability to make appropriate judgments about strategies for evaluation of teaching: Formative evaluation Course evaluation Peer review Objectives addressed: #5: Monitor learner progress formatively in order to make appropriate adjustments. Read to relate recommended practices to own teaching experience in order to approve experiences of learners: Berk, Naumann, & Appling, 2004, Article 10 Brownson, Fielding & Maylahn, 2009, 175-201 Elzubeir & Rizk, 2002, 313-319 Hatzipanagos & Lygo-Baker, 2006, 97-105 Instructional In-class resources: Arreola, 2006, Felder & Brent, 2004, 200-202 Kirschling, et al., 1995, 401-410 Nilson, 2010,
EBT%20Syllabus%20Spg%202012-1.docx