654 Ronald 93 41 The convention of Change Table REJECT. Murias 802.11 element into a figure specification is in format. Refer to Doc. the format of a 13/1120r1. figure, not in a As I mentioned table. In order to in the above, the keep consistent, Sector the Sector Capabilites Capabilityies element is now element should merged into the be also specified S1G Capabilities in Figure. element by resolution to CID 202. FYI, element ID and length sub-field of the S1G Capabilites element are already in the figure and table as well. (Please refer to <Discussion> As I mentioned in the above, the Sector Capabilites element is now merged into the S1G Capabilities element by resolution to CID 202. FYI, element ID sub-field and length sub-field of the S1G Capabilites element are already well-defined in the figure and table as well. (Please refer to “11-13-1098-00-00ah-cc9-resolution-of-cid-201and-202”) TGah editor: resolution to CID 202 already covers resolution to these CIDs. 683 Ronald 150 53 What's a Type 0 Propose three REJECT. Murias Sectorization options: Scheme element? Option-1: Define Refer to Doc. What's a Type 1 Type 0 13/1120r1. Sectorization Sectorization Scheme element? Scheme element I agree with what and Type 1 the commenter Searched entire Sectorization pointed out. As I 11ah/D0.1 doc, Scheme element. mentioned in the they only occur in above, this also is the paragarph in Option-2: Delete resolved by line 52 page 150. the paragraph in resolution to CID line 52 on page 202 which 150. describes the Sector Operation Option-3: Element if -- replace "Type 0 sectorization type Sectorization is group Scheme element" sectorzation and
654 Ronald Murias 93 41 The convention of 802.11 element specification is in the format of a figure, not in a table. In order to keep consistent, the Sector Capabilityies element should be also specified in Figure. Change Table into a figure format. REJECT. Refer to Doc. 13/1120r1. As I mentioned in the above, the Sector Capabilites element is now merged into the S1G Capabilities element by resolution to CID 202. FYI, element ID and length sub-field of the S1G Capabilites element are already in the figure and table as well. (Please refer to <Discussion> As I mentioned in the above, the Sector Capabilites element is now merged into the S1G Capabilities element by resolution to CID 202. FYI, element ID sub-field and length sub-field of the S1G Capabilites element are already well-defined in the figure and table as well. (Please refer to “11-13-1098-00-00ah-cc9-resolution-of-cid-201and-202”) TGah editor: resolution to CID 202 already covers resolution to these CIDs. 683 Ronald Murias 150 53 What's a Type 0 Sectorization Scheme element? What's a Type 1 Sectorization Scheme element? Searched entire 11ah/D0.1 doc, they only occur in the paragarph in line 52 page 150. Propose three options: Option-1: Define Type 0 Sectorization Scheme element and Type 1 Sectorization Scheme element. Option-2: Delete the paragraph in line 52 on page 150. Option-3: -- replace "Type 0 Sectorization Scheme element" REJECT. Refer to Doc. 13/1120r1. I agree with what the commenter pointed out. As I mentioned in the above, this also is resolved by resolution to CID 202 which describes the Sector Operation Element if sectorization type is group sectorzation and
11-13-1120-01-00ah-cc9-mac-comment-resolutions-on-sectorization.docx