IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Comment resolution on Clauses 26.3.9 and 26.3.10 2016-11-04 Date: Yusuke Asai 1-1 Hikari-no-oka, asai.yusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp +81-46-859-3494 NTT Yasuhiko Inoue Yokosuka, Kanagawa inoue.yasuhiko@lab.ntt.co.jp 239-0847 Japan Junichi Iwatani iwatani.junichi@lab.ntt.co.jp Abstract This submission proposes resolutions for multiple comments on Clauses 26.3.9 and 26.3.10 of the IEEE 802.11ax D0.1 with the following 15 CIDs: 2043, 2044, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2050, 2051, 2052, 2053, 2054, 2055, 2056, 2058, 2059, 2062 (15 comments), These comments are for Clause 26 but were erroneously submitted for clause 6. CID PP.LL Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 2048 121.45 6.3.9.9 "r" is Define "r" as RU Revised. undefined in (26-36) Agreed in principle. This comment is for Clause 26.3.9.9, not 6.3.9.9. Not only r but also u should be defined. See the resolution presenteded in 16/1377 (this document). Discussion The equation (26-36) on P245L11 in D0.5 does not have the explicit definitions of the RU index and the r user index These indices should be defined within the paragraph. u. Proposed Text (#2048) Add the following text at the last paragraph of the Clause 26.3.10.9 in D0.5: TGax Editor:
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Comment resolution on Clauses 26.3.9 and 26.3.10 Date: 2016-11-04 Yusuke Asai NTT 1-1 Hikari-no-oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 239-0847 Japan +81-46-859-3494 asai.yusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp Yasuhiko Inoue inoue.yasuhiko@lab.ntt.co.jp Junichi Iwatani iwatani.junichi@lab.ntt.co.jp Abstract This submission proposes resolutions for multiple comments on Clauses 26.3.9 and 26.3.10 of the IEEE 802.11ax D0.1 with the following 15 CIDs: 2043, 2044, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2050, 2051, 2052, 2053, 2054, 2055, 2056, 2058, 2059, 2062 (15 comments), These comments are for Clause 26 but were erroneously submitted for clause 6. CID PP.LL Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 2048 121.45 6.3.9.9 "r" is undefined in (26-36) Define "r" as RU Revised. Agreed in principle. This comment is for Clause 26.3.9.9, not 6.3.9.9. Not only r but also u should be defined. See the resolution presenteded in 16/1377 (this document). Discussion The equation (26-36) on P245L11 in D0.5 does not have the explicit definitions of the RU index r and the user index u. These indices should be defined within the paragraph. Proposed Text TGax Editor: Add the following text at the last paragraph of the Clause 26.3.10.9 in D0.5: (#2048)
11-16-1377-05-00ax-comment-resolution-on-clauses-26-3-9-and-26-3-10.docx