"10.2.2 Power management in a non-DMG infrastructure Add any missing stuff for MAC network" contains vast amounts of detail. "10.2.6 Power PBSSes and DMG management in a PBSS and DMG infrastructure BSS" is ABSSes much thinner. Is it really the case that the latter is complete for DMG infrastructure BSSes (e.g. it doesn't include any stuff)? Discussion The comment to identify a specific issue to be addressed. Proposed resolution: Rejected The comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. Comment Proposed Change Owning Ad-hoc Are FTM frames bufferable? This subclause Either state that a non-AP STA MAC suggests they are doing FTM needs to be in active mode during burst instances, or state that FTM frames are not bufferable Discussion Have talked to some FTM folks, here is the feedback: Non-AP STA doing FTM needs to be in Active mode. This, though not explicitly stated, is implicit in the protocol specification. Not sure what value it adds by stating it explicitly. Need more work. Will be discussed in PM1 Wed in Nov. Proposed resolution: TBD Rejected. Non-AP STA doing FTM needs to be in Active mode. This, though not explicitly stated, is implicit in the protocol specification and is clear if you read the entire protocol specification. Comment Proposed Change Owning Ad-hoc "For a STA using U-APSD, the AP transmits one BU After the first sentence MAC destined for the STA from any AC that is not cited add "The AP should
"10.2.2 Power management in a non-DMG infrastructure network" contains vast amounts of detail. "10.2.6 Power management in a PBSS and DMG infrastructure BSS" is much thinner. Is it really the case that the latter is complete for DMG infrastructure BSSes (e.g. it doesn't include any stuff)? Add any missing stuff for PBSSes and DMG ABSSes MAC Discussion The comment to identify a specific issue to be addressed. Proposed resolution: Rejected The comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. Comment Proposed Change Owning Ad-hoc Are FTM frames bufferable? This subclause suggests they are Either state that a non-AP STA doing FTM needs to be in active mode during burst instances, or state that FTM frames are not bufferable MAC Discussion Have talked to some FTM folks, here is the feedback: Non-AP STA doing FTM needs to be in Active mode. This, though not explicitly stated, is implicit in the protocol specification. Not sure what value it adds by stating it explicitly. Need more work. Will be discussed in PM1 Wed in Nov. Proposed resolution: TBD Rejected. Non-AP STA doing FTM needs to be in Active mode. This, though not explicitly stated, is implicit in the protocol specification and is clear if you read the entire protocol specification. Comment Proposed Change Owning Ad-hoc "For a STA using U-APSD, the AP transmits one BU destined for the STA from any AC that is not After the first sentence cited add "The AP should MAC
11-15-1180-07-000m-sb0-resolutions-for-ps-comments.docx