= 110 mothers N 147 children aged 11-14 (M=12.46). 50% male Community sample Ppts who declined the intervention formed the control group (n=66). Parents completed: Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (Johnston & Mash, 1989) • Eyberg Behavior Inventory (Eyberg & Ross, 1978) • Parental Behavioral Control Scale (Kerr & Stattin, 2000) • Parental Reactions Scale (Tilton, Weaver et al., 2010) • Treatment Engagement and Client Satisfaction (Moretti & Osbuth, 2009) • Adolescents completed: Alcohol and cigarette use questionnaire (Giannotta, Ortega, & Stattin, 2013) • Post intervention mothers reported a slight reduction in coldness and rejection compared to the control (p=.11, d=.32) A moderate significant reduction in alcohol consumption among youths in the treatment group. No other significant results were found among any of the other measures A high attrition rate was observed for both the intervention group (32%) and the control group (27%). Van Zeijl et al. (2006), Holland Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD) -attachment based intervention that aims to increase maternal sensitivity, empathy, responsiveness and sensitive discipline towards the child. 6 week intervention Randomized controlled between subjects = 237 mothers N 237 children aged 1-3. 56% boys Clinical sample - children with externalising behaviour difficulties Randomly allocated to intervention (n=120) or control Mothers completed: Daily Hassles (Kanner, Coyne, Schaffer & Lazarus, 1981) • Dutch Family Problems Questionnaire (Koot, 1997) marital discord subscale used • – Cantrill Ladder (Cantrill, 1965) • Infant Characteristics Questionnaire (Bates, Freeland, & Lounsbury, 1979) • Behavior Checklist (Achenbach & Edelbrock, 1981). • Maternal attitudes towards sensitivity and sensitive discipline • & Van IJzendoorn, 2003) Maternal sensitivity and maternal discipline - observed in laboratory sessions •
N = 110 mothers 147 children aged 11-14 (M=12.46). 50% male Community sample Ppts who declined the intervention formed the control group (n=66). Parents completed: • Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (Johnston & Mash, 1989) • Eyberg Behavior Inventory (Eyberg & Ross, 1978) • Parental Behavioral Control Scale (Kerr & Stattin, 2000) • Parental Reactions Scale (Tilton, Weaver et al., 2010) • Treatment Engagement and Client Satisfaction (Moretti & Osbuth, 2009) Adolescents completed: • Alcohol and cigarette use questionnaire (Giannotta, Ortega, & Stattin, 2013) Post intervention mothers reported a slight reduction in coldness and rejection compared to the control (p=.11, d=.32) A moderate significant reduction in alcohol consumption among youths in the treatment group. No other significant results were found among any of the other measures A high attrition rate was observed for both the intervention group (32%) and the control group (27%). Van Zeijl et al. (2006), Holland Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD) -attachment based intervention that aims to increase maternal sensitivity, empathy, responsiveness and sensitive discipline towards the child. 6 week intervention Randomized controlled between subjects N = 237 mothers 237 children aged 1-3. 56% boys Clinical sample - children with externalising behaviour difficulties Randomly allocated to intervention (n=120) or control Mothers completed: • Daily Hassles (Kanner, Coyne, Schaffer & Lazarus, 1981) • Dutch Family Problems Questionnaire (Koot, 1997) – marital discord subscale used • Cantrill Ladder (Cantrill, 1965) • Infant Characteristics Questionnaire (Bates, Freeland, & Lounsbury, 1979) • Behavior Checklist (Achenbach & Edelbrock, 1981). • Maternal attitudes towards sensitivity and sensitive discipline & Van IJzendoorn, 2003) • Maternal sensitivity and maternal discipline - observed in laboratory sessions
E-thesis.docx