referring to control field in this row of 'VHT format'; the table, in HT control VHT case field is defined MFB (as as shown in the [B0=HT/VHT, picture below) includes the on HT/VHT SNR, hence format]; HT HT MFB and format VHT MFB description for are different. B1-B31 reflects Also, MAI is 11n-2009 and not defined simply add text for the VHT specifying that case this is the meaning when B0 is set to 0. VHT format has an independent description for B1-B31 which uses the current one in table and is valid only when B0 is set to 1; The denomination +HTC is intended to mean that an HT control field is included (either in HT or VHT format); When relevant, the HT or VHT format is explicitly indicated with additional text; 1344 7.1.3.5a 5 TR Don't need to Remove the Agree. As in MAC re-interpret mentioned text comment MFB/ASELC and table 7-6a. field in Table 7-6a, because when HT/VHT
referring to this row of the table, in VHT case MFB (as shown in the picture below) includes the SNR, hence HT MFB and VHT MFB are different. Also, MAI is not defined for the VHT case control field in 'VHT format'; HT control field is defined as [B0=HT/VHT, on HT/VHT format]; HT format description for B1-B31 reflects 11n-2009 and simply add text specifying that this is the meaning when B0 is set to 0. VHT format has an independent description for B1-B31 which uses the current one in table and is valid only when B0 is set to 1; The denomination +HTC is intended to mean that an HT control field is included (either in HT or VHT format); When relevant, the HT or VHT format is explicitly indicated with additional text; 1344 7.1.3.5a 5 TR Don't need to re-interpret MFB/ASELC field in Table 7-6a, because when HT/VHT Remove the mentioned text and table 7-6a. Agree. As in comment MAC
11-11-0345-00-00ac-comments-resolution-ht-control-field.docx