The provider is meeting ACPE's requirements for The provider has failed to meet ACPE's requirements CPE Monitor® submission to CPE Monitor®. for submission to CPE Monitor®. (checked by ACPE Staff) Needs Improvement Meets or Additional Docs Required Application to the Each CPE activity is applicable to the practice of The provider’s CPE activities are not applicable to Practice of Pharmacy pharmacy as defined by the current Definition of the practice of pharmacy as by the current Continuing Pharmacy Education. Definition of Continuing Pharmacy Education (e.g., personal financial management), presents topics without a full discussion of the pros and cons, or without research-based evidence (e.g., herbals). Needs Improvement Meets or Additional Docs Required Activity Information Information about individual activities matches ACPE The Universal Activity Numbers do not match Matches ACPE records. For example, Universal Activity Numbers ACPE's records Records match ACPE's records. Needs Improvement Meets or Additional Docs Required If the rating is Needs Improvements or Commend, briefly explain the rationale (use additional sheets if needed): Organization and Clarity of the Report and Evaluation Form Please evaluate the overall organization and clarity of information in the provider’s report to assist in improving the quality of future reports. Meets Criterion Commendable Needs Improvement Organization of the A response and relevant All sections of the report are Information is difficult to find. Report supporting documentation is complete and organized to Sections are not well labeled, supplied for each criterion. The facilitate finding information, e.g., paginated or incorrectly information is organized in a are numbered and sections numbered. The provider does not logical manner. have labeled, tabbed dividers. respond to requests for Narrative descriptions and information for all criteria or documentation of activities are responds in a terse, dismissive or thorough, clear and concise. The uninformative manner. provider's responses appear honest and it presents viable plans Narrative responses or for quality improvement where documentation appears deceptive. needed. Needs Improvement Meets or Additional Docs Required Commend
CPE Monitor® (checked by ACPE Staff) The provider is meeting ACPE's requirements for submission to CPE Monitor®. Meets The provider has failed to meet ACPE's requirements for submission to CPE Monitor®. Needs Improvement or Additional Docs Required Application to the Practice of Pharmacy Each CPE activity is applicable to the practice of pharmacy as defined by the current Definition of Continuing Pharmacy Education. Meets The provider’s CPE activities are not applicable to the practice of pharmacy as by the current Definition of Continuing Pharmacy Education (e.g., personal financial management), presents topics without a full discussion of the pros and cons, or without research-based evidence (e.g., herbals). Needs Improvement or Additional Docs Required Activity Information Matches ACPE Records Information about individual activities matches ACPE records. For example, Universal Activity Numbers match ACPE's records. Meets The Universal Activity Numbers do not match ACPE's records Needs Improvement or Additional Docs Required If the rating is Needs Improvements or Commend, briefly explain the rationale (use additional sheets if needed): Organization and Clarity of the Report and Evaluation Form Please evaluate the overall organization and clarity of information in the provider’s report to assist in improving the quality of future reports. Meets Criterion Commendable Needs Improvement Organization of the Report A response and relevant supporting documentation is supplied for each criterion. The information is organized in a logical manner. Meets All sections of the report are complete and organized to facilitate finding information, e.g., are numbered and sections have labeled, tabbed dividers. Narrative descriptions and documentation of activities are thorough, clear and concise. The provider's responses appear honest and it presents viable plans for quality improvement where needed. Commend Information is difficult to find. Sections are not well labeled, paginated or incorrectly numbered. The provider does not respond to requests for information for all criteria or responds in a terse, dismissive or uninformative manner. Narrative responses or documentation appears deceptive. Needs Improvement or Additional Docs Required
CPE_Standards_Rubric_v4_071017_FINAL.docx