The commenter is correct that the purpose and context of this field is not stated here, and Discussion: explaining that it is always in the VHT Compressed Beamforming Frame would be helpful to the reader. The commenter proposed the word "shall be contained", but "shall" must not be used in clause 8, so "shall" is changed to "is". Note that 8.5.23.2 (VHT Compressed Beamforming frame format) already contains the sentence: "The VHT MIMO Control field is always present in the frame." Proposed Resolution: Revised. last sentence on 50.42, add sentence "The VHT MIMO Control field is included in every VHT Compressed Beamforming frame (see 8.5.23.2 VHT Compressed Beamforming frame format)." CID Commenter Clause Page Comment Proposed Resolution Number(C) Change 6457 Mark RISON 8.4.1.48 51.56 "if it is not the first Change to just Rejected. feedback segment "otherwise" The text or if the VHT describing the Compressed case does “0” Beamforming add some Report field and information, MU Exclusive and so should Beamforming not be replaced Report field are not with present in the “otherwise”. frame." is duplication Discussion: The description of the "0" case does add some information as the case is not just the “0” simple complement of the case, and therefore it seems prudent to keep the definition as-is. “1” Proposed Resolution: Rejected.
Discussion: The commenter is correct that the purpose and context of this field is not stated here, and explaining that it is always in the VHT Compressed Beamforming Frame would be helpful to the reader. The commenter proposed the word "shall be contained", but "shall" must not be used in clause 8, so "shall" is changed to "is". Note that 8.5.23.2 (VHT Compressed Beamforming frame format) already contains the sentence: "The VHT MIMO Control field is always present in the frame." Proposed Resolution: Revised. last sentence on 50.42, add sentence "The VHT MIMO Control field is included in every VHT Compressed Beamforming frame (see 8.5.23.2 VHT Compressed Beamforming frame format)." CID Commenter Clause Number(C) Page Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6457 Mark RISON 8.4.1.48 51.56 "if it is not the first feedback segment or if the VHT Compressed Beamforming Report field and MU Exclusive Beamforming Report field are not present in the frame." is duplication Change to just "otherwise" Rejected. The text describing the “0” case does add some information, and so should not be replaced with “otherwise”. Discussion: The description of the "0" case does add some information as the “0” case is not just the simple complement of the “1” case, and therefore it seems prudent to keep the definition as-is. Proposed Resolution: Rejected.
11-12-1155-01-00ac-mu-comment-resolution-part-2.docx