Name: Date: Module: Markers: ITEM 1 AGENDA SETTING AND ADHERENCE – Competence Examples level NB: Score according to features, not examples! 0 No agenda set, highly inappropriate agenda set, or agenda not adhered to. Inappropriate agenda set (eg. lack of focus, unrealistic, no account of patient’s 1 presentation, homework not reviewed. An attempt at an agenda made, but major difficulties evidence (eg. Unilaterally set). 2 Poor adherence. Appropriate agenda, which was set well, but some difficulties evident (eg. Poor 3 collaboration). Some adherence. Appropriate agenda, minor difficulties evident (eg. no prioritization), but appropriate 4 features covered (eg. review of homework). Moderate adherence. Appropriate agenda set with discrete and prioritized targets review at the end. – 5 Agenda adhered to. Minimal problems. 6 Excellent agenda set, or highly effective agenda set in the face of difficulties. ITEM 2 FEEDBACK – Competence Examples level NB: Score according to features, not examples! Absence of feedback or highly inappropriate feedback. 0 Minimal appropriate feedback (verbal and/or written) 1 Appropriate feedback, but not given frequently enough by therapist, with insufficient attempts to elicit and give feedback, eg. feedback too vague to provide opportunities 2 for understanding and change. Appropriate feedback given and elicited frequently, although some difficulties evident 3 in terms of content or method of delivery. Appropriate feedback given and elicited frequently, facilitating moderate therapeutic 4 gains. Minor problems evident (eg. inconsistent). Highly appropriate feedback and elicited regularly, facilitating shared 5 understanding and enabling significant therapeutic gains. Minimal problems. Excellent use of feedback, or highly effective feedback given and elicited regularly in 6 the face of difficulties.
Name: Date: Module: Markers: ITEM 1 – AGENDA SETTING AND ADHERENCE Competence level Examples NB: Score according to features, not examples! 0 No agenda set, highly inappropriate agenda set, or agenda not adhered to. 1 Inappropriate agenda set (eg. lack of focus, unrealistic, no account of patient’s presentation, homework not reviewed. 2 An attempt at an agenda made, but major difficulties evidence (eg. Unilaterally set). Poor adherence. 3 Appropriate agenda, which was set well, but some difficulties evident (eg. Poor collaboration). Some adherence. 4 Appropriate agenda, minor difficulties evident (eg. no prioritization), but appropriate features covered (eg. review of homework). Moderate adherence. 5 Appropriate agenda set with discrete and prioritized targets – review at the end. Agenda adhered to. Minimal problems. 6 Excellent agenda set, or highly effective agenda set in the face of difficulties. ITEM 2 – FEEDBACK Competence level Examples NB: Score according to features, not examples! 0 Absence of feedback or highly inappropriate feedback. 1 Minimal appropriate feedback (verbal and/or written) 2 Appropriate feedback, but not given frequently enough by therapist, with insufficient attempts to elicit and give feedback, eg. feedback too vague to provide opportunities for understanding and change. 3 Appropriate feedback given and elicited frequently, although some difficulties evident in terms of content or method of delivery. 4 Appropriate feedback given and elicited frequently, facilitating moderate therapeutic gains. Minor problems evident (eg. inconsistent). 5 Highly appropriate feedback and elicited regularly, facilitating shared understanding and enabling significant therapeutic gains. Minimal problems. 6 Excellent use of feedback, or highly effective feedback given and elicited regularly in the face of difficulties.
CTSR_rating_scale.docx