Engages students in meaningful Delivers knowledge with Delivers lesson and learning experiences where Student Experiences no opportunities for encourages student they can construct their own student involvement participation knowledge using a wide array of tasks and materials Instructional Strategies 1 2 3 Standard Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds Score Expectations Expectations Expectations Uses a variety of Uses a wide variety of appropriate teaching innovative teaching strategies Relies on the same strategies to help Variety to explain content in an strategies routinely students attain enthusiastic and focused knowledge that is manner usable and applicable Uses higher questions and Does not use questions Manages student responds to questions clearly Discussions effectively interactions fairly and promptly to promote student learning Demonstrates outstanding Demonstrates ability to navigate abstract and abstract and concrete Difficulty moving concrete teaching and teaching tasks with Critical Thinking beyond concrete infuses examples that are intentionality, application of lessons aligned to developmental multicultural and needs, cultural perspectives ethical competence and learning styles Does not use expected Uses online Fully uses online methods of adequate online instructional methods instruction and support for instructional methods, Online Instruction (if applicable) with occasional student learning in an demonstrating difficulty exceptional fashion persistent difficulty Evaluation, Remediation, and Gatekeeping 1 2 3 Standard Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds Score Expectations Expectations Expectations Uses a wide variety of Uses some variation in Relies on the same evaluation appropriate evaluation Evaluation evaluation of student strategies routinely strategies to assess student learning learning Acknowledges but lacks Acts with students and other Does not identify students in assertiveness in faculty to provide effective Remediation need of potential remediation addressing issues of remediation strategies for remediation students in need Acknowledges but Effectively intervenes with Ignored gatekeeping issues assertiveness in Gatekeeping faculty to address a student requiring student interventions addressing gatekeeping gatekeeping issues issues Site Supervisor, please an X in the table to rate the doctoral intern’s ability to do the following: 1 2 3 Task Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds Not Applicable / Comments Expectations Expectations Expectations Construct a syllabus Provide clear lectures Conduct class discussion Design and conduct small group discussion Balances lecture, practice and activities
Student Experiences Delivers knowledge with no opportunities for student involvement Delivers lesson and encourages student participation Engages students in meaningful learning experiences where they can construct their own knowledge using a wide array of tasks and materials Instructional Strategies Standard 1 Does Not Meet Expectations 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations Score Variety Relies on the same strategies routinely Uses a variety of appropriate teaching strategies to help students attain knowledge that is usable and applicable Uses a wide variety of innovative teaching strategies to explain content in an enthusiastic and focused manner Discussions Does not use questions effectively Manages student interactions fairly Uses higher questions and responds to questions clearly and promptly to promote student learning Critical Thinking Difficulty moving beyond concrete application of lessons Demonstrates abstract and concrete teaching tasks with intentionality, multicultural and ethical competence Demonstrates outstanding ability to navigate abstract and concrete teaching and infuses examples that are aligned to developmental needs, cultural perspectives and learning styles Online Instruction (if applicable) Does not use expected adequate online instructional methods, demonstrating persistent difficulty Uses online instructional methods with occasional difficulty Fully uses online methods of instruction and support for student learning in an exceptional fashion Evaluation, Remediation, and Gatekeeping Standard 1 Does Not Meet Expectations 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations Score Evaluation Relies on the same evaluation strategies routinely Uses some variation in evaluation of student learning Uses a wide variety of appropriate evaluation strategies to assess student learning Remediation Does not identify students in need of potential remediation Acknowledges but lacks assertiveness in addressing issues of remediation Acts with students and other faculty to provide effective remediation strategies for students in need Gatekeeping Ignored gatekeeping issues requiring student interventions Acknowledges but assertiveness in addressing gatekeeping issues Effectively intervenes with faculty to address a student gatekeeping issues Site Supervisor, please an X in the table to rate the doctoral intern’s ability to do the following: Task 1 Does Not Meet Expectations 2 Meets Expectations 3 Exceeds Expectations Not Applicable / Comments Construct a syllabus Provide clear lectures Conduct class discussion Design and conduct small group discussion Balances lecture, practice and activities
Doc%20Internship%20Manual%20Final%208.28.17.docx