Success rate Clinical 86.9%clinical 95.6%clinical P value: ˃0.05 &radiographical 76.08% radiographical 91.3% radiographical clinical ˂0.05 radiographic Outcome Results Name Device unit Pulpotomy Pulpectomy P Value ‘ Casas, Pathologic root Radiograph Binary Internal 17% Kenny et resorption External 33% External 27% al. 2004 Periapical Radiograph Binary 58% 27% radiolucency Pulp canal Radiograph Binary 25% obliteration Widening of PDL Radiograph Binary 67% 18% space Pain Questionnaire Binary 0% 0% Gingival swelling Visual exam. Binary 22% Fistulous tract Visual exam. Binary 22% Success rate Clinical and 78%clinical 100%clinical P value: ˃0.05 radiographical 59%radiographical 82%radiographical radiographical
Success rate Clinical &radiographical 86.9%clinical 76.08% radiographical 95.6%clinical 91.3% radiographical P value: ˃0.05 clinical ˂0.05 radiographic Outcome Results ‘ Name Device unit Pulpotomy Pulpectomy P Value Casas, Kenny et al. 2004 Pathologic root resorption Radiograph Binary Internal 17% External 33% External 27% Periapical radiolucency Radiograph Binary 58% 27% Pulp canal obliteration Radiograph Binary 25% Widening of PDL space Radiograph Binary 67% 18% Pain Questionnaire Binary 0% 0% Gingival swelling Visual exam. Binary 22% Fistulous tract Visual exam. Binary 22% Success rate Clinical and radiographical 78%clinical 59%radiographical 100%clinical 82%radiographical P value: ˃0.05 radiographical
ecca2a14-01cb-40e5-be44-544a3a649378_Dataset_1.docx