IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs LB 188 Comments Resolutions for Sub-Clause 9.19 (Part 2) Date: 2012-09-20 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Chunhui Samsung 75 W. Plumeria Dr, +1-408-544-2751 (Allan) Zhu Electronics San Jose, CA, USA This document provides resolutions for comments in sub-clause 9.19 of draft spec D3.0 (LB188). All CIDs are for MAC ad hoc. Sub-clause 9.19.2.5: 6768, 6045, 6046, 6769 Sub-clause 9.19.2.5: CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6768 130.44 9.19.2.5 Where did this "802.11-2012" Update the included 'legacy Accepted text come from? The real 2012 text' to the actual David 802.11-2012 has "0" in place 802.11-2012 text. Hunter of "zero" on this line. Same on line 23 of the next page. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6045 130.47 9.19.2.5 "for that AC was successful as Insert the following as a new defined in this subclause" NOTE after item b): Adrian Stephens We had a big discussion on "NOTE--For the purpose of what "successful" meant at the this subclause, successful last meeting. The rationale reception of a response to for inserting "all MPDUs" in any of the MPDUs in this the line above was that the PPDU determines that correct reception of any of transmission of all MPDUs them defined correct reception in the PPDU was for all of them. successful." I think it is still misleading, and had to re-read this subclause several times to determine that it is consistent.
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs LB 188 Comments Resolutions for Sub-Clause 9.19 (Part 2) Date: 2012-09-20 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Chunhui (Allan) Zhu Samsung Electronics 75 W. Plumeria Dr, San Jose, CA, USA +1-408-544-2751 This document provides resolutions for comments in sub-clause 9.19 of draft spec D3.0 (LB188). All CIDs are for MAC ad hoc. Sub-clause 9.19.2.5: 6768, 6045, 6046, 6769 Sub-clause 9.19.2.5: CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6768 David Hunter 130.44 9.19.2.5 Where did this "802.11-2012" text come from? The real 802.11-2012 has "0" in place of "zero" on this line. Same on line 23 of the next page. Update the included 'legacy 2012 text' to the actual 802.11-2012 text. Accepted CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Resolution 6045 Adrian Stephens 130.47 9.19.2.5 "for that AC was successful as defined in this subclause" We had a big discussion on what "successful" meant at the last meeting. The rationale for inserting "all MPDUs" in the line above was that the correct reception of any of them defined correct reception for all of them. I think it is still misleading, and had to re-read this subclause several times to determine that it is consistent. Insert the following as a new NOTE after item b): "NOTE--For the purpose of this subclause, successful reception of a response to any of the MPDUs in this PPDU determines that transmission of all MPDUs in the PPDU was successful."
11-12-1048-02-00ac-lb-188-comments-resolutions-for-sub-clause-9-19-part-2.docx