D3.1 P530: Proposed Resolution: CID 16031 Draft is clear that DCM can be applied to RUs containing data for 1 user. Hence, the change Rejected. “only” proposed by the commenter is redundant. CID 16978 CID Clause Page.Line Comment Proposed Change 16978 28.3.11.9 526.09 "DCM is not applied with MU-MIMO", remove "In an HE MU PPDU or and in the paragraph after the spec HE TB PPDU, DCM can be say "DCM can be applied only to applied only to RUs containing data for 1 user". RUs containing data for 1 user." these are talk about the same rule. only need one or the other. Background D3.1 P530: Proposed Resolution: CID 16978 Rejected. The first phrase (“DCM can be applied only to RUs containing data for 1 user”) does indicate that DCM cannot be used together with MU-MIMO. However, the first phrase also clarifies that the if an HE MU or HE TB PPDU has multiple RUs, where some RUs have 1 user while other RUs have multiple users, then the RUs with 1 user can still use DCM. Hence, it is recommended to keep both phrases. CID 17099 CID Clause Page.Line Comment Proposed Change 17099 28.3.11.10 526.64 Better wording needed. This is really At P526L64, change "If in an RU, an editorial comment, but marking it DL MU-MIMO is applied, STBC as technical so that people can shall not be used in any RU in the review. HE MU PPDU." to "If any RU in an HE MU PPDU uses DL then STBC shall not be used in any RU in the HE MU PPDU." Background D3.1 P530-531: Proposed Resolution: CID 17099
D3.1 P530: Proposed Resolution: CID 16031 Rejected. Draft is clear that DCM can be applied “only” to RUs containing data for 1 user. Hence, the change proposed by the commenter is redundant. CID 16978 CID Clause Page.Line Comment Proposed Change 16978 28.3.11.9 526.09 "DCM is not applied with MU-MIMO", and in the paragraph after the spec say "DCM can be applied only to RUs containing data for 1 user". these are talk about the same rule. only need one or the other. remove "In an HE MU PPDU or HE TB PPDU, DCM can be applied only to RUs containing data for 1 user." Background D3.1 P530: Proposed Resolution: CID 16978 Rejected. The first phrase (“DCM can be applied only to RUs containing data for 1 user”) does indicate that DCM cannot be used together with MU-MIMO. However, the first phrase also clarifies that the if an HE MU or HE TB PPDU has multiple RUs, where some RUs have 1 user while other RUs have multiple users, then the RUs with 1 user can still use DCM. Hence, it is recommended to keep both phrases. CID 17099 CID Clause Page.Line Comment Proposed Change 17099 28.3.11.10 526.64 Better wording needed. This is really an editorial comment, but marking it as technical so that people can review. At P526L64, change "If in an RU, DL MU-MIMO is applied, STBC shall not be used in any RU in the HE MU PPDU." to "If any RU in an HE MU PPDU uses DL then STBC shall not be used in any RU in the HE MU PPDU." Background D3.1 P530-531: Proposed Resolution: CID 17099
11-18-1590-00-00ax-d3-0-comment-resolution-part-1.docx