1256 30.04 9.2.4.4.1 The starting bit position of Modify the diagram with the MPDU Sequence correct bit position Number in Figure 4 should be B(MPDU Modulo+3). 1257 30.04 9.2.4.4.1 the length of the MPDU Correct the diagram Sequence Number in Figure 4 is illustrated as B(MSDU Modulo+2), should it be B(MPDU Modulo+3) Proposal: Reject Discussion: Let’s take an example of MSDU Modulo = 5. In this case the MSDU SN field is [B2 B6], it is 5 bits – allocated for MSDU Modulo. The MPDU SN field is [B7-B15] it is 9 bits allocated for MPDU SN. 9+5 – = 14 equal to the MSDU modulo + MPDU modulo. So, no issues to fix are found. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1285 31.07 9.2.4.4.1 "The Start of MSDUn As in comment. subfield is set to one to indicate that......" Much places need to change, if this comment is approved. Change "set to one to " to " set to 1 to" for keeping the same style as REVmd Proposal: Reject Discussion: Propose keeping on the editor’s responsibility to resolve the style issues. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1380 31.04 9.2.4.4.1 It is not clear what is the Add reserved bits structure of this field (reserved bits), when MSDU Modulo+MPDU Modulo<14 1381 32.14 9.3.1.8.3 It is not clear what is the Add reserved bits structure of this field (reserved bits), when MSDU Modulo+MPDU Modulo<14 Proposal: Revised
1256 30.04 9.2.4.4.1 The starting bit position of the MPDU Sequence Number in Figure 4 should be B(MPDU Modulo+3). Modify the diagram with correct bit position 1257 30.04 9.2.4.4.1 the length of the MPDU Sequence Number in Figure 4 is illustrated as B(MSDU Modulo+2), should it be B(MPDU Modulo+3) Correct the diagram Proposal: Reject Discussion: Let’s take an example of MSDU Modulo = 5. In this case the MSDU SN field is [B2 – B6], it is 5 bits allocated for MSDU Modulo. The MPDU SN field is [B7-B15] – it is 9 bits allocated for MPDU SN. 9+5 = 14 equal to the MSDU modulo + MPDU modulo. So, no issues to fix are found. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1285 31.07 9.2.4.4.1 "The Start of MSDUn subfield is set to one to indicate that......" Change "set to one to " to " set to 1 to" for keeping the same style as REVmd As in comment. Much places need to change, if this comment is approved. Proposal: Reject Discussion: Propose keeping on the editor’s responsibility to resolve the style issues. CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change 1380 31.04 9.2.4.4.1 It is not clear what is the structure of this field (reserved bits), when MSDU Modulo+MPDU Modulo<14 Add reserved bits 1381 32.14 9.3.1.8.3 It is not clear what is the structure of this field (reserved bits), when MSDU Modulo+MPDU Modulo<14 Add reserved bits Proposal: Revised
11-18-0667-00-00ay-lb231-comment-resolution-of-cid-in-range-of-1069-2402.docx