decent substitute for in “expects” this case 6363 John 75.50 The second case here Change "is not an Revise generally – Coffey 0 is when the relevant S1G STA" to "is an agree with STA is not an S1G HE STA". comment - TGax STA, whereas earlier editor shall make in the same section the changes shown (P75 L20) the in 11-17/0777r5 condition is "within an that are marked HE BSS". Is some with CID 6363. distinction intended? Can TWT be used in non-S1G, non-HE BSSs? 7170 kaiying 70.27 The Wake TBTT Please change to Revise generally – Lv Negotiation subfield is "Description when agree with set to in TWT transmitted by a comment - TGax elements transmitted TWT scheduling editor shall make by a responding STA STA, Wake TBTT the changes shown and by a Negotiation subfield in 11-17/0777r5 scheduling STA. In =0." that are marked table 9- with CID 7170. when transmitted by a TWT scheduling STA, Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield = 1", which is conflicted with the above statement. 7184 kaiying 75.02 change"TWT As in comment Revise generally – Lv broadcast agree with field"to"broadcast comment - TGax field" editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r5 that are marked with CID 7184. 7208 71.04 the description about " please clarify it Revise generally kaiying – Lv Demand agree with TWT" is incorrect. comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0296r2 that are marked with CID 8125.
decent substitute for “expects” in this case 6363 John Coffey 75.50 The second case here is when the relevant STA is not an S1G STA, whereas earlier in the same section (P75 L20) the condition is "within an HE BSS". Is some distinction intended? Can TWT be used in non-S1G, non-HE BSSs? Change "is not an S1G STA" to "is an HE STA". Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r5 that are marked with CID 6363. 7170 kaiying Lv 70.27 The Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield is set to in TWT elements transmitted by a responding STA and by a scheduling STA. In table when transmitted by a TWT scheduling STA, Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield = 1", which is conflicted with the above statement. Please change to "Description when transmitted by a TWT scheduling STA, Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield =0." Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r5 that are marked with CID 7170. 7184 kaiying Lv 75.02 change"TWT broadcast field"to"broadcast field" As in comment Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r5 that are marked with CID 7184. 7208 kaiying Lv 71.04 the description about " Demand TWT" is incorrect. please clarify it Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0296r2 that are marked with CID 8125. 9- 0
11-17-0777-05-00ax-cr-twt-ie.docx