239 6.33 4.3.23.3 "Reasons for such selective Please clarify what situation is Discuss: Propose rejection. reception include the MAC assumed here. Base spec has similar service requirement that, when requirements, although I an MSDU is sent, it is not couldn't find the refernce. returned to and processed by We are not changing Anyone? the transmitting station." transmission requirements, rather receive filtering. It is not the intent of this spec to justify 802.1Q bridging It is not clear to me in what requirements, but to support situation is assumed here. In them. Reasons could also the IEEE 802.11-2012 clause include multicast pruning, 9.3.6, the transmission VLANs presence, and policy. procedure of group address frames is specified which is not consistent with the above text. 258 6.33 4.3.23.3 "Reasons for such selective Please explain clearly what Reject: Dup CID239 reception include the MAC situation is assumed here. service requirement that, when an MSDU is sent, it is not returned to and processed by the transmitting station." Its situation should be clarified. It is not clear if the transmission procedure of group address frames specified in the IEEE clause 9.3.6 is included in the above explanation. 295 8.19 4.3.23.4.3 The subset of STAs to Change "an arbitrary" to "a Reject: "an arbitrary subset" is received a group addressed is specific". a mathematical statement. In not arbitrary, it's a specifc that context the definition of subset as defined in the arbitrary from the OED is " SYNRA. (Of a constant or other quantity) of unspecified value". The AP must be willing to accept an arbitrary subset of all associated STA as the receipients. It is not specified here, but in the Should we add a refernce?
239 6.33 4.3.23.3 "Reasons for such selective reception include the MAC service requirement that, when an MSDU is sent, it is not returned to and processed by the transmitting station." It is not clear to me in what situation is assumed here. In the IEEE 802.11-2012 clause 9.3.6, the transmission procedure of group address frames is specified which is not consistent with the above text. Please clarify what situation is assumed here. Discuss: Propose rejection. Base spec has similar requirements, although I couldn't find the refernce. Anyone? We are not changing transmission requirements, rather receive filtering. It is not the intent of this spec to justify 802.1Q bridging requirements, but to support them. Reasons could also include multicast pruning, VLANs presence, and policy. 258 6.33 4.3.23.3 "Reasons for such selective reception include the MAC service requirement that, when an MSDU is sent, it is not returned to and processed by the transmitting station." Its situation should be clarified. It is not clear if the transmission procedure of group address frames specified in the IEEE clause 9.3.6 is included in the above explanation. Please explain clearly what situation is assumed here. Reject: Dup CID239 295 8.19 4.3.23.4.3 The subset of STAs to received a group addressed is not arbitrary, it's a specifc subset as defined in the SYNRA. Change "an arbitrary" to "a specific". Reject: "an arbitrary subset" is a mathematical statement. In that context the definition of arbitrary from the OED is " (Of a constant or other quantity) of unspecified value". The AP must be willing to accept an arbitrary subset of all associated STA as the receipients. It is not specified here, but in the Should we add a refernce?
11-15-0795-00-00ak-addressing-comment-resolutions.docx