11621 Dorothy 403.37 some of the variables As in Revised. comment Stanley Change to as in are defined below Eq the resolution of 28-9, and some are CID11621 in doc not. Lets define or provide references to definitions of all the variables. 11620 Dorothy 403.27 its not clear in an HE as in Rejected. comment Stanley Same reason as TB PPDU for a user CID #11602 with an RU <=242 in a 40, 80, or 160/80+80MHz bandwidth, whether L-STF is transmitted in the user's 20 MHz or the entire PPDU BW. Something in this equation needs to be indexed on a per-user basis, perhaps i_BW or Omega_20MHz? In Clause 28.3.4 says: as in 11622 Dorothy 403.27 Rejected. comment Stanley Same reason as "In the HE TB PPDU, CID #11613 the pre-HE modulated fields, which include L-LTF, L-SIG, and HESIGA fields, are sent only on the 20 MHz channels where the STA's HE modulated fields are located." I don't see how this equation matches this statement for UL MU. There needs to be a per-user component for UL MU. This equation needs to be modeled like Eq 28-4. Best would be to create separate equations for UL MU. 11629 Dorothy 404.45 its not clear in an HE as in Rejected. comment Stanley Same reason as TB PPDU for a user CID #11602 with an RU <=242 in a
11621 Dorothy Stanley 403.37 some of the variables are defined below Eq 28-9, and some are not. Lets define or provide references to definitions of all the variables. As in comment Revised. Change to as in the resolution of CID11621 in doc 11620 Dorothy Stanley 403.27 its not clear in an HE TB PPDU for a user with an RU <=242 in a 40, 80, or 160/80+80MHz bandwidth, whether L-STF is transmitted in the user's 20 MHz or the entire PPDU BW. Something in this equation needs to be indexed on a per-user basis, perhaps i_BW or Omega_20MHz? as in comment Rejected. Same reason as CID #11602 11622 Dorothy Stanley 403.27 In Clause 28.3.4 says: "In the HE TB PPDU, the pre-HE modulated fields, which include L-LTF, L-SIG, and HESIGA fields, are sent only on the 20 MHz channels where the STA's HE modulated fields are located." I don't see how this equation matches this statement for UL MU. There needs to be a per-user component for UL MU. This equation needs to be modeled like Eq 28-4. Best would be to create separate equations for UL MU. as in comment Rejected. Same reason as CID #11613 11629 Dorothy Stanley 404.45 its not clear in an HE TB PPDU for a user with an RU <=242 in a as in comment Rejected. Same reason as CID #11602
11-18-0110-05-00ax-11ax-comment-resolutions-for-phy-preamble.docx