Clause Page(C) Line(C) Comment Proposed Change Number(C) 29.5.9.4.3 440 16 It's not clear what the code rate R should be for Add a code rate R example a) listed here. In b.b)-k) there are to example b)a. explicit code rates listed, and they're computed or rewrite all of b) L_CW*R, here R is implicit? in a different structure. Resolution: Revised. Editor: p 440, line 15, add the list of LDPC code used in the case b).a) as below Convert the scrambled PSDU bits to LDPC codewords as follows: If = 1 and LCW = 672 1344: ρ The output stream of scrambler is broken into the blocks of length LCWD = LCW×R bits such that the mth data word is To each data word, parity bits , LCWP = LCW - LCWD, are added to create the codeword such that Editor: p 495, line 7, add the list of LDPC code rates used in the case b).a) as below Convert the scrambled PSDU bits to LDPC codewords as follows: If LCW = 672 1344: The output stream of scrambler is broken into the blocks of length LCWD = LCW×R bits such that the mth data word is To each data word, parity bits , LCWP = LCW LCWD, are added to create the codeword – such that CID 3065 Clause Page(C) Line(C) Comment Proposed Change Number(C) 29.5.9.4.3 440 15 I write this entire section Make a text such as: "The differently. Among subpoints a-k under scrambled PSDU values subheading b, item b) a. is a general are converted to LDPC algorithm but for specified values of codewords using the L_CW and and rho. Why not instead following strategcy, make a table of rho, L_CW and R, and where starting values are give the general formula in b)a. , rather listed in Table XX: than repeating the same thing for different constants 10 times? ...." Then remove b)b.-k. (on page 440, line 23 - page 443, line 31)
Clause Number(C) Page(C) Line(C) Comment Proposed Change 29.5.9.4.3 440 16 It's not clear what the code rate R should be for example a) listed here. In b.b)-k) there are explicit code rates listed, and they're computed L_CW*R, here R is implicit? Add a code rate R to example b)a. or rewrite all of b) in a different structure. Resolution: Revised. Editor: p 440, line 15, add the list of LDPC code used in the case b).a) as below Convert the scrambled PSDU bits to LDPC codewords as follows: If ρ = 1 and LCW = 672 1344: The output stream of scrambler is broken into the blocks of length LCWD = LCW×R bits such that the mth data word is To each data word, parity bits , LCWP = LCW - LCWD, are added to create the codeword such that Editor: p 495, line 7, add the list of LDPC code rates used in the case b).a) as below Convert the scrambled PSDU bits to LDPC codewords as follows: If LCW = 672 1344: The output stream of scrambler is broken into the blocks of length LCWD = LCW×R bits such that the mth data word is To each data word, parity bits , LCWP = LCW – LCWD, are added to create the codeword such that CID 3065 Clause Number(C) Page(C) Line(C) Comment Proposed Change 29.5.9.4.3 440 15 I write this entire section differently. Among subpoints a-k under subheading b, item b) a. is a general algorithm but for specified values of L_CW and and rho. Why not instead make a table of rho, L_CW and R, and give the general formula in b)a. , rather than repeating the same thing for different constants 10 times? Make a text such as: "The scrambled PSDU values are converted to LDPC codewords using the following strategcy, where starting values are listed in Table XX: ...." Then remove b)b.-k. (on page 440, line 23 - page 443, line 31)
11-18-1678-00-00ay-cid-resolution-part-xi.docx