TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 7689. 7807 Mark Use proper normative Change Accepted- Hamilton verbs "delivers" to "shall deliver" TGax editor changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 7807. 7808 Mark Use proper normative Change "can" Accepted- Hamilton verbs to "may". Same thing TGax editor changes as at P163L35, shown in 11-17/1286r0 that P164L47, are marked with CID 7808. P167L2, P171L12, P171L52, P174L36. 8053 Massinissa is no "DL As in Revised- Lalam OFDMA With MIMO comment. Support" field defined Agree in principle. The right in the HE Capabilities HE Capabilities bit should be element subclause refered. Per proposed 9.4.2.218. Either add resolution of CID 4804, this this field if missing or sentence will be removed. refer to the correct The corresponding sentence one(s). So far the in to 59 is modified intent of the sentence correspondingly. is not really clear for me to decide to which TGax editor changes as already existing fields shown in 11-17/1286r0 that of the HE Capabilities are marked with CID 8053. element to refer. Does the sentence refer to a DL OFDMA transmission plus DL MU-MIMO on some RUs, or just DL OFDMA with more than one spatial streams on some RUs? 8167 Ming Gan "explicitly deliver change "any Rejected- BQRs in any frame frame" to sent to the AP", what "any frame There is no need to put is "any frame". It is which redunt info in the spec. The not clear. Actually it contains only way for a STA to report requires this frame Control field" BQR is through BQR contains A-control field. TGax editor makes no changes on CID 8167.
TGax editor makes changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 7689. 7807 Mark Hamilton Use proper normative verbs Change "delivers" to "shall deliver" Accepted- TGax editor changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 7807. 7808 Mark Hamilton Use proper normative verbs Change "can" to "may". Same thing at P163L35, P164L47, P167L2, P171L12, P171L52, P174L36. Accepted- TGax editor changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 7808. 8053 Massinissa Lalam is no "DL OFDMA With MIMO Support" field defined in the HE Capabilities element subclause 9.4.2.218. Either add this field if missing or refer to the correct one(s). So far the intent of the sentence is not really clear for me to decide to which already existing fields of the HE Capabilities element to refer. Does the sentence refer to a DL OFDMA transmission plus DL MU-MIMO on some RUs, or just DL OFDMA with more than one spatial streams on some RUs? As in comment. Revised- Agree in principle. The right HE Capabilities bit should be refered. Per proposed resolution of CID 4804, this sentence will be removed. The corresponding sentence in to 59 is modified correspondingly. TGax editor changes as shown in 11-17/1286r0 that are marked with CID 8053. 8167 Ming Gan "explicitly deliver BQRs in any frame sent to the AP", what is "any frame". It is not clear. Actually it requires this frame contains A-control field. change "any frame" to "any frame which contains field" Rejected- There is no need to put redunt info in the spec. The only way for a STA to report BQR is through BQR TGax editor makes no changes on CID 8167. Control
11-17-1286-00-00ax-cr-dl-mu-procedure.docx