Change == to = at 1542.8, 1542.11, 1542.12. At 1232.13, delete == B16”. “C7 Change = to == at 1880.62, 1880.65, 1881.42, 1881.46, 1883.22. Change != to at 1733.19, 3566.17. ≠ Change <> to at 1514.8, 1514.35, 1820.1, 2183.25, 2183.30, 2185.26, 2212.21, 2271.22. ≠ Proposed resolution: REVISED Make the changes shown under changes” for CID 6582 in <this document>, which use proper glyphs “Proposed for ==, !=/<>, >=, <= where not in ASCII text and where not in Boolean contexts. Identifiers Comment Proposed change CID 6661 "attribute values" in the context of PHY As it says in the comment Mark RISON characteristics should be "characteristics". Discussion: It seems reasonable to assert that something describing characteristics, in a subclause about characteristics or carried in a CHARACTERISTICS primitive, should be called a characteristic. For MAC characteristics as well as PHY characteristics, in fact. Proposed resolution: REVISED Change values” to at 1275.55. “attribute “characteristics” Change attribute” to at 1840.1, 1840.8. “sublayer “characteristic” Identifiers Comment Proposed change CID 6754 Table 9-17 should be moved to clause 8, As it says in the comment Mark RISON somewhere near Table 8-34 [these might be D3.0 references] Discussion: The table which needs moving is Table 9-17 Valid address field usage for Mesh Data and Multihop Action frames. This is a table showing frame formats. It should be in Clause 8, not Clause 9. It is very similar to Table 8-26 Address field contents. Proposed resolution: REVISED
Change == to = at 1542.8, 1542.11, 1542.12. At 1232.13, delete “C7 == B16”. Change = to == at 1880.62, 1880.65, 1881.42, 1881.46, 1883.22. Change != to ≠ at 1733.19, 3566.17. Change <> to ≠ at 1514.8, 1514.35, 1820.1, 2183.25, 2183.30, 2185.26, 2212.21, 2271.22. Proposed resolution: REVISED Make the changes shown under “Proposed changes” for CID 6582 in <this document>, which use proper glyphs for ==, !=/<>, >=, <= where not in ASCII text and where not in Boolean contexts. Identifiers Comment Proposed change CID 6661 Mark RISON "attribute values" in the context of PHY characteristics should be "characteristics". As it says in the comment Discussion: It seems reasonable to assert that something describing characteristics, in a subclause about characteristics or carried in a CHARACTERISTICS primitive, should be called a characteristic. For MAC characteristics as well as PHY characteristics, in fact. Proposed resolution: REVISED Change “attribute values” to “characteristics” at 1275.55. Change “sublayer attribute” to “characteristic” at 1840.1, 1840.8. Identifiers Comment Proposed change CID 6754 Mark RISON Table 9-17 should be moved to clause 8, somewhere near Table 8-34 [these might be D3.0 references] As it says in the comment Discussion: The table which needs moving is Table 9-17 Valid address field usage for Mesh Data and Multihop Action frames. This is a table showing frame formats. It should be in Clause 8, not Clause 9. It is very similar to Table 8-26 Address field contents. Proposed resolution: REVISED
11-15-0762-15-000m-resolutions-for-some-comments-on-11mc-d4-0-sbmc1.docx