Dorothy to prepare a motion for consideration at the January Interim Session in Irvine. Doc 11-17/1810r0 - Artyom LOMAYEV Review Submission Missing definition of PHYCONFIG VECTOR Queston on what is being proposed to be added. A new sub clause being added would need to be instructed differently. There already existis a 20.3.1, so is the intent to add before or after the existing clause. Suggested wording a new subclause, and renumber the following “insert clauses). This would give the new clause the number to be 20.2.3. Check the order in 20.1 make the new 20.3 match the order. – Insert the following as subclause as 20.2.3 The coloring is not material to the instructions. Discussion on the indexing method proposed. Change the to fixes the concern (in the red text). “can” Range 1-11 is correct, but it should only be the odd numbers Make a cross reference to avoid duplicate definition It seems to be a definition for Channel number being defined here, and not in Annex E, so only one place should have the definition. It would be better to delete channel Number” as it is defined a few “and line later. Question on least channel 2”? “at Channel 2 is the mandatory channel The least” is not necessary in the sentence. “at Shall support Channel 2 is the requirement, the other Channels are optional. Suggest support Channel 2 and may support other channels as “Shall well”. The changes will be made offline and then the revision to be posted to the reflector for consideration. The difference between Channel number and the Channel” “Operating was questioned. New wording can be created, but will need to be done offline. The Channel number is no longer 1-11, it is from 1-6. Labels on the figure may help It does seem confusion the overloading of Number” “Channel Schedule to review on January 5th. GEN Discuss CIDs: 29, 76, 324 CID 29 (GEN) Review comment Proposed Resolution: REVISED (GEN: 2017-12-01 16:11:11Z) - Change sentence to "This type of IEEE 802.11 LAN is often formed without preplanning." Discussion on if the the sentence was accurate. No objection Mark Ready for Motion – CID 76 (GEN) Review comment
Dorothy to prepare a motion for consideration at the January Interim Session in Irvine. Doc 11-17/1810r0 - Artyom LOMAYEV Review Submission Missing definition of PHYCONFIG VECTOR Queston on what is being proposed to be added. A new sub clause being added would need to be instructed differently. There already existis a 20.3.1, so is the intent to add before or after the existing clause. Suggested wording “insert a new subclause, and renumber the following clauses). This would give the new clause the number to be 20.2.3. Check the order in 20.1 – make the new 20.3 match the order. Insert the following as subclause as 20.2.3 The coloring is not material to the instructions. Discussion on the indexing method proposed. Change the “can” to fixes the concern (in the red text). Range 1-11 is correct, but it should only be the odd numbers Make a cross reference to avoid duplicate definition It seems to be a definition for Channel number being defined here, and not in Annex E, so only one place should have the definition. It would be better to delete “and channel Number” as it is defined a few line later. Question on “at least channel 2”? Channel 2 is the mandatory channel The “at least” is not necessary in the sentence. Shall support Channel 2 is the requirement, the other Channels are optional. Suggest “Shall support Channel 2 and may support other channels as well”. The changes will be made offline and then the revision to be posted to the reflector for consideration. The difference between Channel number and the “Operating Channel” was questioned. New wording can be created, but will need to be done offline. The Channel number is no longer 1-11, it is from 1-6. Labels on the figure may help It does seem confusion the overloading of “Channel Number” Schedule to review on January 5th. GEN Discuss CIDs: 29, 76, 324 CID 29 (GEN) Review comment Proposed Resolution: REVISED (GEN: 2017-12-01 16:11:11Z) - Change sentence to "This type of IEEE 802.11 LAN is often formed without preplanning." Discussion on if the the sentence was accurate. No objection – Mark Ready for Motion CID 76 (GEN) Review comment
11-17-1536-00-000m-minutes-for-2017-december-and-2018-january-telecons.docx