Lack of local financial capacity Cost-sharing mechanisms proportional sharing of costs Costs of pollution externalized User groups control fees downstream Targeted subsidies, e.g. for disposal in sanitary landfill Weak mechanisms for Develop WUA, BCWUA, and DWB 3. Collective choice participation structures negotiation and agreement on Those affected by rules can new rules participate in modifying rules Pathogens and heavy metals Provide laboratory testing 4. Accountable Monitoring invisible Make quality data publicly Users lack information on water available Monitors actively resource quality Technical support and auditing Treatment and monitoring require (inspection) conditions and behavior; and technical expertise Community monitoring of improper are accountable to users disposal BCWUAs lack formal authority to Use local power” “social 5. Graduated Sanctions enforce rules and fees, legislative Use authority of IWMDs and Local changes not likely soon Units, e.g. for fee collection and from warnings and mild backup enforcement sanctions, to severe enforcement difficult Develop BCWUAs and DWBs as 6. Low-cost conflict resolution forums Improve conflict resolution skills Easy access to local arenas to settle conflicts Lack of suitable institutional Community-based initiatives 7. Rights to organize arrangements for providing accepted and supported by IWMDs specialized local public goods and local government acceptance or support for local initiatives Need to organize on multiple Use multiple levels of WUAs and 8. Nested enterprises scales, e.g. of drainage canals local government Multiple layers of organization Annex 1: Stakeholder consultations Stakeholder meeting at Nekla pilot area General The Nekla pilot area is situated in the Mahmoudia district, in the upstream part of the Mahmoudia main canal in the Nile delta. The pilot area covers about 13,000 feddan in the command areas of the Hamad Menesi, Nekla, Ganabiet Hamad Menesi, Ganabiet Sharaf and Ganabiet El-Babli branch canals. Drainage is provided by the El-Atf main drain and El-Babli and Edko Sharaf secondary drains. 2. Stakeholder meeting To introduce the project to the stakeholders and listen to their views and feedback, a stakeholder meeting was held on 13 June 2011. The meeting was attended by representatives of the IIIMP, EPADP, the Planning Sector of MWRI, ISSIP and WUA and BCWUA in the area. A list of the participants is given below.
proportional sharing of costs Lack of local financial capacity Costs of pollution externalized downstream Cost-sharing mechanisms User groups control fees Targeted subsidies, e.g. for disposal in sanitary landfill 3. Collective choice Those affected by rules can participate in modifying rules Weak mechanisms for participation Develop WUA, BCWUA, and DWB structures negotiation and agreement on new rules 4. Accountable Monitoring Monitors actively resource conditions and behavior; and are accountable to users Pathogens and heavy metals invisible Users lack information on water quality Treatment and monitoring require technical expertise Provide laboratory testing Make quality data publicly available Technical support and auditing (inspection) Community monitoring of improper disposal 5. Graduated Sanctions from warnings and mild sanctions, to severe BCWUAs lack formal authority to enforce rules and fees, legislative changes not likely soon Use local “social power” Use authority of IWMDs and Local Units, e.g. for fee collection and backup enforcement 6. Low-cost conflict resolution Easy access to local arenas to settle conflicts enforcement difficult Develop BCWUAs and DWBs as forums Improve conflict resolution skills 7. Rights to organize acceptance or support for local initiatives Lack of suitable institutional arrangements for providing specialized local public goods Community-based initiatives accepted and supported by IWMDs and local government 8. Nested enterprises Multiple layers of organization Need to organize on multiple scales, e.g. of drainage canals Use multiple levels of WUAs and local government Annex 1: Stakeholder consultations Stakeholder meeting at Nekla pilot area General The Nekla pilot area is situated in the Mahmoudia district, in the upstream part of the Mahmoudia main canal in the Nile delta. The pilot area covers about 13,000 feddan in the command areas of the Hamad Menesi, Nekla, Ganabiet Hamad Menesi, Ganabiet Sharaf and Ganabiet El-Babli branch canals. Drainage is provided by the El-Atf main drain and El-Babli and Edko Sharaf secondary drains. 2. Stakeholder meeting To introduce the project to the stakeholders and listen to their views and feedback, a stakeholder meeting was held on 13 June 2011. The meeting was attended by representatives of the IIIMP, EPADP, the Planning Sector of MWRI, ISSIP and WUA and BCWUA in the area. A list of the participants is given below.
E28820v20EA0P100Box365764B03828556.docx