information and the information and the number number of students that of students that percentage percentage reflects ie. reflects ie. 31%=1134 students) 28%=129 students) FCAT 2.0 34% (88) of students 38% (98) of students Students scoring at Achievement Level 3 tested achieved will achieve proficiency proficiency (FCAT (FCAT Level 3.0) on the Barrier(s): 3.0) on the reading reading section of the section of the 2012 2013 FCAT Strategy(s): FCAT 1. Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at levels 4, 5, and 6 in Reading N/A N/A Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. FCAT 2.0 18% (48) of students 21% (55) of students Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in Reading achieved above will achieve above proficiency (FCAT proficiency (FCAT Level Barrier(s): Level 4 or 5) in 4 or 5) in reading on reading on the 2012 the 2013 FCAT Strategy(s): FCAT 1. Florida Alternate Assessment: 100% (2) students 100% (2) of students Students scoring at or above Level 7 in Reading achieved at or above will achieve at or above Barrier(s): proficiency (level 7 or proficiency (level 7 or above) on the Florida above) on the Florida Strategy(s): Alternate Assessment Alternate Assessment 1. for 2012 for 2013 Florida Alternate Assessment: N/A N/A Percentage of students making learning Gains in Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. FCAT 2.0 64% (28) of students 68% (30) of students in Percentage of students in lowest 25% making learning gains in Reading in the lowest 25% the lowest 25% will made learning in make learning gains in Barrier(s): Teacher absences/personnel availability reading on the 2012 reading on the 2013 FCAT FCAT Strategy(s): 1. Provide small group Walk to Intervention daily for a minimum of 30 minutes to provide for direct instruction in demonstrated areas of weakness. FCAT 2.0 Percentage of students in lowest 25% making learning gains in Reading Barrier(s): Students attendance in Academic Support Program (ASP) Strategy(s): 2. Implement an Academic Support Program (ASP), to include low performing
information and the number of students that percentage reflects ie. 28%=129 students) information and the number of students that percentage reflects ie. 31%=1134 students) FCAT 2.0 Students scoring at Achievement Level 3 Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 34% (88) of students tested achieved proficiency (FCAT 3.0) on the reading section of the 2012 FCAT 38% (98) of students will achieve proficiency (FCAT Level 3.0) on the reading section of the 2013 FCAT Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at levels 4, 5, and 6 in Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. N/A N/A FCAT 2.0 Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 18% (48) of students achieved above proficiency (FCAT Level 4 or 5) in reading on the 2012 FCAT 21% (55) of students will achieve above proficiency (FCAT Level 4 or 5) in reading on the 2013 FCAT Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at or above Level 7 in Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 100% (2) students achieved at or above proficiency (level 7 or above) on the Florida Alternate Assessment for 2012 100% (2) of students will achieve at or above proficiency (level 7 or above) on the Florida Alternate Assessment for 2013 Florida Alternate Assessment: Percentage of students making learning Gains in Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. N/A N/A FCAT 2.0 Percentage of students in lowest 25% making learning gains in Reading Barrier(s): Teacher absences/personnel availability Strategy(s): 1. Provide small group Walk to Intervention daily for a minimum of 30 minutes to provide for direct instruction in demonstrated areas of weakness. 64% (28) of students in the lowest 25% made learning in reading on the 2012 FCAT 68% (30) of students in the lowest 25% will make learning gains in reading on the 2013 FCAT FCAT 2.0 Percentage of students in lowest 25% making learning gains in Reading Barrier(s): Students attendance in Academic Support Program (ASP) Strategy(s): 2. Implement an Academic Support Program (ASP), to include low performing
Cambridge%20Elementary.docx