Appendix 7 CB 21 Rubric-Vetting Data Results as of February 18, 2009 Discipline Number of Approval Contingent other 4 levels 6 levels comments on comments participants work adequate adequate levels Approval 57 1 1 6.5% wanted 3 18 85.7% Math 83 none need to deal with levels, 5.2% five (1.3%) (1.3%) (74%) (23.4%) geometry levels 1 or 2 levels 1 2 50% 25% want only 3 78.6% want 12 14 Reading 33 few levels & 10.7% levels included (3.6%) (7.1%) (42.9%) (50%) more than 4 ESL 35 25 7 10 1 1 3 14 including word ESL writing some decisions count 63.2% yes (5.3%) (5.3%) (15.8%) (73.7%) (36.8%) (52.6%) based on local 36.8% no course offerings 10 5 5 0 0 100% ESL listening & (50%) (50%) speaking 2(66.7%) 1(33.3%) 0 0 0 100% 3 ESL reading 26 3 3 0 much relates to 37 29 English 70 word counts ESL & student (56.1%) (39.4%) (4.5%) (43.9%) (4.5%) 52.7% helpful; population 47.3% not helpful 40.9% 3 levels 5 other total 226
Appendix 7 CB 21 Rubric-Vetting Data Results as of February 18, 2009 Discipline Number of participants Approval Contingent Approval work other 4 levels adequate 6 levels adequate comments on levels comments Math 83 57 (74%) 18 (23.4%) 1 (1.3%) 1 (1.3%) 85.7% none 6.5% wanted 3 levels, 5.2% five levels need to deal with geometry 1 or 2 levels Reading 33 12 (42.9%) 14 (50%) 1 (3.6%) 2 (7.1%) 50% few 25% want only 3 levels & 10.7% more than 4 78.6% want levels included ESL 35 ESL writing 25 7 (36.8%) 10 (52.6%) 1 (5.3%) 1 (5.3%) 3 (15.8%) 14 (73.7%) some decisions based on local course offerings including word count 63.2% yes 36.8% no ESL listening & speaking 10 5 (50%) 5 (50%) 0 0 100% ESL reading 3 2(66.7%) 1(33.3%) 0 0 0 100% English 70 37 (56.1%) 26 (39.4%) 3 (4.5%) 0 29 (43.9%) 3 (4.5%) much relates to ESL & student population 40.9% 3 levels word counts 52.7% helpful; 47.3% not helpful other 5 total 226
CB%2021-%20Chapter_12.docx