A numerical value will be assigned for each of the goals: 1 point for LOW, 2 points for EXPECTED, and 3 points for HIGH. The two point values will be averaged together to determine the State Growth Rating using the table below. ( For example, if the reading MSGP is LOW and the math MSGP is expected, then 1+2=3 and 3/2=1.5. Then the state growth rating would be EXPECTED based on the table below.) When up to three years of student growth data is available, the student growth rating will be averaged to determine overall Student Growth Rating for teachers. A numerical value will be assigned to each year’s overall rating with 1 point for LOW, 2 points for EXPECTED, and 3 points for HIGH. The point values assigned for each year will be averaged with equal weighting for each year. Then the score ranges given in the following table will be used to determine the final trend rating for the Local Student Growth Rating. STATE GROWTH RATING BASED ON AVERAGE SCORE RANGE TREND DATA Low 1.00 -- 1.49 Expected 1.50 -- 2.49 High 2.50 -- 3.00 Determining the Overall Performance Category An educator’s Overall Performance Category is determined using the following steps:
A numerical value will be assigned for each of the goals: 1 point for LOW, 2 points for EXPECTED, and 3 points for HIGH. The two point values will be averaged together to determine the State Growth Rating using the table below. ( For example, if the reading MSGP is LOW and the math MSGP is expected, then 1+2=3 and 3/2=1.5. Then the state growth rating would be EXPECTED based on the table below.) When up to three years of student growth data is available, the student growth rating will be averaged to determine overall Student Growth Rating for teachers. A numerical value will be assigned to each year’s overall rating with 1 point for LOW, 2 points for EXPECTED, and 3 points for HIGH. The point values assigned for each year will be averaged with equal weighting for each year. Then the score ranges given in the following table will be used to determine the final trend rating for the Local Student Growth Rating. STATE GROWTH RATING BASED ON TREND DATA AVERAGE SCORE RANGE Low 1.00 -- 1.49 Expected 1.50 -- 2.49 High 2.50 -- 3.00 Determining the Overall Performance Category An educator’s Overall Performance Category is determined using the following steps:
CERTIFIED--Metcalfe%20County%20Certified%20Evaluation%20Plan%202015_16%20TDAPPROVED%20(1).docx