Students should possess Multiple choice Expectation Standard -- Based on the assessment HUMR instructors The objectives are the knowledge and questions regarding 80% of students will data that was gathered, should continue to keep important for the HRM skills needed to performance appraisal achieve an average no major changes or abreast of new research program, and effectively manage the formats/methods and rating of 3.0 or higher. actions are required. in the area of assessment of these compensation function. performance appraisal performance appraisal objectives should rating errors and Biases (1) 82% of students However, HUMR by reading the most continue. This year’s is on will be developed by achieved an average of instructors should recent issues of performance appraisal. HR faculty. These 3.0 or higher with continue to on top’ Personnel Psychology ‘stay Students will be questions will be regard to of recent research in the and the Journal of “Performance expected to demonstrate embedded in Exam #2 Characteristic” # 1. area of performance Applied Psychology. their knowledge of the of HUMR 427 appraisal. research literature (Compensation). (2) 85% of students regarding performance achieved an average appraisal Performance rating of 3.0 or higher formats/methods. Characteristics (1) with regard to – Students will also be Knowledge of the “Performance expected to demonstrate research literature Characteristic” # 2. their knowledge of the regarding performance research literature Students exceeded the appraisal regarding performance expectation standards formats/methods. (2) appraisal rating errors for both “Performance Knowledge of the and biases. Characteristics.” research literature regarding performance The students have appraisal rating errors demonstrated that they and biases. have adequate knowledge of the Scoring Levels – research literature 5 = Excellent (90-100) regarding both 4 = Above Average performance appraisal methods, and 3 = Competent (70-79) performance appraisal 2 = Below Average rating errors and biases. 1 = Poor (0-59)
Students should possess the knowledge and skills needed to effectively manage the compensation function. This year’s is on performance appraisal. Students will be expected to demonstrate their knowledge of the research literature regarding performance appraisal formats/methods. Students will also be expected to demonstrate their knowledge of the research literature regarding performance appraisal rating errors and biases. Multiple choice questions regarding performance appraisal formats/methods and performance appraisal rating errors and Biases will be developed by HR faculty. These questions will be embedded in Exam #2 of HUMR 427 (Compensation). Performance Characteristics – (1) Knowledge of the research literature regarding performance appraisal formats/methods. (2) Knowledge of the research literature regarding performance appraisal rating errors and biases. Scoring Levels – 5 = Excellent (90-100) 4 = Above Average 3 = Competent (70-79) 2 = Below Average 1 = Poor (0-59) Expectation Standard -- 80% of students will achieve an average rating of 3.0 or higher. (1) 82% of students achieved an average of 3.0 or higher with regard to “Performance Characteristic” # 1. (2) 85% of students achieved an average rating of 3.0 or higher with regard to “Performance Characteristic” # 2. Students exceeded the expectation standards for both “Performance Characteristics.” The students have demonstrated that they have adequate knowledge of the research literature regarding both performance appraisal methods, and performance appraisal rating errors and biases. Based on the assessment data that was gathered, no major changes or actions are required. However, HUMR instructors should continue to ‘stay on top’ of recent research in the area of performance appraisal. HUMR instructors should continue to keep abreast of new research in the area of performance appraisal by reading the most recent issues of Personnel Psychology and the Journal of Applied Psychology. The objectives are important for the HRM program, and assessment of these objectives should continue.
CBPA%20Assessment%20Report%20AY%202008-18.docx