miscalculating hourly employees’ overtime pay GIRARD LLP 505 14th Street by excluding commissions from the overtime Suite 1110 rate during weeks in which they worked more Oakland, California 94612 than 40 hours. 510 350-9700 (Ph.) 10-4-2017 14-CV-2017 (W.D. Okla.) Rickey Royal, Sandra Epperson and Greg Hurley Not set For more information v. Stoneridge, Inc., Stoneridge Control yet write to: Devices, Inc. f/k/a Joseph Pollak Corp. (collectively, (“CSID”) Jeffrey T. Hossley & Embry, LLP Plaintiffs claim that the clutch safety 515 S. Vine Avenue interlock devices (CSIDs) in certain Chrysler TX 75702 vehicles equipped with manual transmissions are defective because they contain return F. Leighton Durham III springs that may fatigue. CSIDs operate to Kelly, Durham & prevent ignition unless a vehicle’s clutch Pittard, LLP pedal is depressed. Plaintiffs claim that P.O. Box 224626 fatigued return springs in a CSID can fail Dallas, TX 75222 such that a driver is able to engage the engine starter motor without the clutch pedal being depressed, which could result in unintended vehicle movement without warning. The same alleged defect could also prevent engine start up without prior warning, which could cause a crash. Plaintiffs allege that Stoneridge is contractually obligated to indemnify owners of vehicles containing the CSIDs for damages they have sustained, namely the need to replace their CSIDs. 10-5-2017 15-CV-00575 (S.D. Cal.) Rlhn v. Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. 10-3-2017 For more inforamtion write or call: Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by W. Gonnello, knowingly misrepresenting to the public Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP
miscalculating hourly employees’ overtime pay by excluding commissions from the overtime rate during weeks in which they worked more than 40 hours. GIRARD LLP 505 14th Street Suite 1110 Oakland, California 94612 510 350-9700 (Ph.) 10-4-2017 14-CV-2017 (W.D. Okla.) Rickey Royal, Sandra Epperson and Greg Hurley v. Stoneridge, Inc., Stoneridge Control Devices, Inc. f/k/a Joseph Pollak Corp. (collectively, (“CSID”) Plaintiffs claim that the clutch safety interlock devices (CSIDs) in certain Chrysler vehicles equipped with manual transmissions are defective because they contain return springs that may fatigue. CSIDs operate to prevent ignition unless a vehicle’s clutch pedal is depressed. Plaintiffs claim that fatigued return springs in a CSID can fail such that a driver is able to engage the engine starter motor without the clutch pedal being depressed, which could result in unintended vehicle movement without warning. The same alleged defect could also prevent engine start up without prior warning, which could cause a crash. Plaintiffs allege that Stoneridge is contractually obligated to indemnify owners of vehicles containing the CSIDs for damages they have sustained, namely the need to replace their CSIDs. Not set yet For more information write to: Jeffrey T. Hossley & Embry, LLP 515 S. Vine Avenue TX 75702 F. Leighton Durham III Kelly, Durham & Pittard, LLP P.O. Box 224626 Dallas, TX 75222 10-5-2017 15-CV-00575 (S.D. Cal.) Rlhn v. Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by knowingly misrepresenting to the public 10-3-2017 For more inforamtion write or call: W. Gonnello, Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP
CAFA-Notice-October-2017.docx