review and no critical appraisal of included studies National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Literature review No Not a review of effectiveness Related briefing suggests this is not a (2012). A fresh look at the state of driver of interventions systematic review education in America. National Institute for Health and Clinical NICE Review No Too not directly Only part of this is relevant to deaths – Excellence. (2010). Strategies to prevent relevant and covers whole of teenagers in motor vehicles. Some unintentional injuries among the under-15s. population, not just teenagers of the SRs which inform the guidance which are relevant are already included: SR1 = ref 48, SR2=risk factor correlates, not effectiveness of interventions, SR3= ref 4 looks at general population level impact of speeding enforcement and penalties/traffic conviction measures, SR4 & 5 are not relevant, SR6=ref 3 economic evaluation relevance –some re; cost-effectiveness of speeding enforcement National Institute for Health and Clinical NICE review report No See ref 48 Excellence (2013). Preventing unintentional road injuries among under-15s: road design. O'Brien N. (2013). Supervised hours Primary research No Not a systematic review of the Submitted by SJ requirements in graduated driver licensing. effectiveness of interventions Effectiveness and parental awareness. Park A et al. (2009). Current practice and NICE Review No Interventions relevant to this Review underpinning ref 46 innovative approaches to prevent childhood CDR Thematic review were unintentional injuries: An overview and synthesis excluded of international comparative analyses and surveys of injury prevention policies, legislation and other activities: An overview and synthesis of international current practice to prevent unintentional injury in children. Patel DR, Greydanus DE & Rowlett JD. (2000). Literature review No Not a systematic review of the Romance with the automobile in the 20th effectiveness of interventions
review and no critical appraisal of included studies National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2012). A fresh look at the state of driver education in America. Literature review No Not a review of effectiveness of interventions Related briefing suggests this is not a systematic review National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2010). Strategies to prevent unintentional injuries among the under-15s. NICE Review No Too – not directly relevant and covers whole population, not just teenagers Only part of this is relevant to deaths of teenagers in motor vehicles. Some of the SRs which inform the guidance which are relevant are already included: SR1 = ref 48, SR2=risk factor correlates, not effectiveness of interventions, SR3= ref 4 looks at general population level impact of speeding enforcement and penalties/traffic conviction measures, SR4 & 5 are not relevant, SR6=ref 3 economic evaluation –some relevance re; cost-effectiveness of speeding enforcement National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2013). Preventing unintentional road injuries among under-15s: road design. NICE review report No See ref 48 O'Brien N. (2013). Supervised hours requirements in graduated driver licensing. Effectiveness and parental awareness. Primary research No Not a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions Submitted by SJ Park A et al. (2009). Current practice and innovative approaches to prevent childhood unintentional injuries: An overview and synthesis of international comparative analyses and surveys of injury prevention policies, legislation and other activities: An overview and synthesis of international current practice to prevent unintentional injury in children. NICE Review No Interventions relevant to this CDR Thematic review were excluded Review underpinning ref 46 Patel DR, Greydanus DE & Rowlett JD. (2000). Romance with the automobile in the 20th Literature review No Not a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
CDRTeen%20Report%20PUBLISHED%20FINALV3_add231013%20(2).docx