captured by our clear whether search due to this contributed date of to the observed publication. reduction in SIDS. We found no • studies looking at the effects of advice to avoid soft sleeping surfaces, to promote soother/pacifier use, or to promote room sharing (without bed sharing). Study details Results of the study Main findings and evidence grading Education for mothers D'Halluin AR et al. 2011. Description of Study took place in the maternity department of Intervention: Leaflet on avoidable risk factors for Formative evaluation to Rennes university hospital (France). All mothers usually hospitalised for 3 SIDS plus and educative questionnaire on The improve prevention of sudden days post delivery. All received package of information on prevention of control group did not receive the educative infant syndrome (SIDS): a SIDS before discharge. Mothers in test condition received an educative questionnaire. prospective study. Acta Paediatr questionnaire in addition. Questionnaire repeated (by telephone interview) 100 (10): e147-e151 3 months after leaving hospital Outcome: Knowledge of risk and protective factors for SIDS, compliance with SIDS prevention Study type: Randomised recommendation controlled trial. Formative Quality of study: Suggests that all eligible mothers took part in the study evaluation but not explicitly stated. Follow up rates < 90% for both test and control Evidence statement Grade B: This intervention is groups. Control group less likely to be working class (assume based on supported by evidence of effectiveness from a Intervention: Information plus occupational status not explicit). Self report of compliance with SIDS moderate quality single study – educative questionnaire on prevention recommendations. avoidable risk factors for SIDS. Effect size: From a single randomised controlled Findings: Mothers’ scores at the educative questionnaire was 5.12 (1.52) knowledge of main SIDS risk factors (test vs control) [mean (standard deviation)]. The scores performed 3 months later were AOR 1.69 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.77) p<0.01; indications
captured by our search due to date of publication. clear whether this contributed to the observed reduction in SIDS. • We found no studies looking at the effects of advice to avoid soft sleeping surfaces, to promote soother/pacifier use, or to promote room sharing (without bed sharing). Study details Results of the study Main findings and evidence grading Education for mothers D'Halluin AR et al. 2011. Formative evaluation to improve prevention of sudden infant syndrome (SIDS): a prospective study. Acta Paediatr 100 (10): e147-e151 Study type: Randomised controlled trial. Formative evaluation Intervention: Information plus educative questionnaire on avoidable risk factors for SIDS. Description of Study took place in the maternity department of Rennes university hospital (France). All mothers usually hospitalised for 3 days post delivery. All received package of information on prevention of SIDS before discharge. Mothers in test condition received an educative questionnaire in addition. Questionnaire repeated (by telephone interview) 3 months after leaving hospital Quality of study: Suggests that all eligible mothers took part in the study but not explicitly stated. Follow up rates < 90% for both test and control groups. Control group less likely to be working class (assume based on occupational status – not explicit). Self report of compliance with SIDS prevention recommendations. Findings: Mothers’ scores at the educative questionnaire was 5.12 (1.52) [mean (standard deviation)]. The scores performed 3 months later were Intervention: Leaflet on avoidable risk factors for SIDS plus and educative questionnaire on The control group did not receive the educative questionnaire. Outcome: Knowledge of risk and protective factors for SIDS, compliance with SIDS prevention recommendation Evidence statement Grade B: This intervention is supported by evidence of effectiveness from a moderate quality single study Effect size: From a single randomised controlled knowledge of main SIDS risk factors (test vs control) AOR 1.69 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.77) p<0.01; indications
CDR%20Research%20Evidence%20Review%20SUID%20report%20FINAL%20091014.docx