efficiently and and effectively IP effectively IP disputes disputes. in cohesion with the identified developmental needs and priorities of the country. A At least 50% of Most trained judges understand **** IP culture in beneficiary judges, the relationship between the judiciary that magistrates and effective and efficient encourages local prosecutors adjudication and local innovation innovation and acknowledge the and creativity. creativity as well as relationship between improves the effective and efficient environment for adjudication and local international innovation and creativity. collaboration, technology transfer and investment. More efficient national At least 50% of Most trained judges **** IP dispute settlement beneficiary judges, acknowledge the correlation institutions and fair magistrates and between adjudication and public balance between IPR prosecutors interest. protection and the acknowledge the public interest. correlation between Most trained judges indicated adjudication and public that the training improve interest. their dispute settlement skills. At least 50% of beneficiary judges, magistrates and prosecutors indicate the training has improved their dispute settlement skills. A development At 50% of Most trained judges **** orientation among the beneficiary judges, acknowledge the importance of judiciary for creating a magistrates and balance between the rights and balanced, efficient prosecutors interests of IPR holders, IPR and effective IPR acknowledge the users and the public interest. dispute settlement importance of balance system that supports between the rights and local talent, innovation interests of IPR holders, and creativity while IPR users and the public incentivizing, interest. rewarding and protecting, in an equitable, fair and balanced manner, the rights and interests of all IPR holders, IPR
efficiently and effectively IP disputes in cohesion with the identified developmental needs and priorities of the country. and effectively IP disputes. A IP culture in the judiciary that encourages local innovation and creativity as well as improves the environment for international collaboration, technology transfer and investment. At least 50% of beneficiary judges, magistrates and prosecutors acknowledge the relationship between effective and efficient adjudication and local innovation and creativity. Most trained judges understand the relationship between effective and efficient adjudication and local innovation and creativity. **** More efficient national IP dispute settlement institutions and fair balance between IPR protection and the public interest. At least 50% of beneficiary judges, magistrates and prosecutors acknowledge the correlation between adjudication and public interest. At least 50% of beneficiary judges, magistrates and prosecutors indicate the training has improved their dispute settlement skills. Most trained judges acknowledge the correlation between adjudication and public interest. Most trained judges indicated that the training improve their dispute settlement skills. **** A development orientation among the judiciary for creating a balanced, efficient and effective IPR dispute settlement system that supports local talent, innovation and creativity while incentivizing, rewarding and protecting, in an equitable, fair and balanced manner, the rights and interests of all IPR holders, IPR At 50% of beneficiary judges, magistrates and prosecutors acknowledge the importance of balance between the rights and interests of IPR holders, IPR users and the public interest. Most trained judges acknowledge the importance of balance between the rights and interests of IPR holders, IPR users and the public interest. ****
cdip_22_2.docx