***1NC 1/3*** A. Link—Economic engagement creates a form of control over developing governments Mansfield & Browne 09’Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate, Edward D. Mansfield is Hum Rosen Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Christopher H. Browne Center for International Politics at the University of Pennsylvania. Brian M. Pollins is Associate Professor of Political Science at Ohio State University and a Research Fellow at the Mershon Center. PG 180 recent literature has served clarify the underlying logic of Along those lines, the a second important purpose—to economic-engagement strategy and to point to some of the likely determinants of success or failure. In a striking convergence, virtually all of the recent studies highlight the linkages between domestic politics and foreign policy strategy as the key factors driving the potential effectiveness of economic engagement. Hirschman. The causal logic of economic engagement, and the emphasis on domestic politics, can be traced to He viewed economic engagement as a long-term, transformative strategy. As one state gradually expands economic the resulting interdependence creates vested interests within the target interaction with its target, (asymmetrical) society and government. The beneficiaries of interdependence become addicted to it, they protect their and interests by pressuring the government to accommodate the source of interdependence. Economic engagement is a means to get other states to want what you want, rather than is a form of structural linkage; it to do what you want. The causal chain runs from domestic to economic interdependence through political change foreign policy accommodation.
***1NC 1/3*** A. Link—Economic engagement creates a form of control over developing governments Mansfield & Browne 09’Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate, Edward D. Mansfield is Hum Rosen Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Christopher H. Browne Center for International Politics at the University of Pennsylvania. Brian M. Pollins is Associate Professor of Political Science at Ohio State University and a Research Fellow at the Mershon Center. PG 180 Along those lines, the recent literature has served a second important purpose—to clarify the underlying logic of economic-engagement strategy and to point to some of the likely determinants of success or failure. In a striking convergence, virtually all of the recent studies highlight the linkages between domestic politics and foreign policy strategy as the key factors driving the potential effectiveness of economic engagement. The causal logic of economic engagement, and the emphasis on domestic politics, can be traced to Hirschman. He viewed economic engagement as a long-term, transformative strategy. As one state gradually expands economic interaction with its target, the resulting (asymmetrical) interdependence creates vested interests within the target society and government. The beneficiaries of interdependence become addicted to it, and they protect their interests by pressuring the government to accommodate the source of interdependence. Economic engagement is a form of structural linkage; it is a means to get other states to want what you want, rather than to do what you want. The causal chain runs from economic interdependence through domestic political change to foreign policy accommodation.
Capitalism-Kritik-2016-2017.docx