Which outcome(s) would you like to focus on now? Use the next question as probes: The two questions are more factual and may be answered more quickly. What was our starting point for this outcome? How well have we done so far? Where would we like to be [choose one: in one year, five years, or another time span]? What do we think are the best or promising practices to get there? Show 6: Outcomes We have a few final questions: How helpful has it been to use the model in evaluating your partnership and in reflecting about the issues in our partnership? Is this a process that would be helpful to do on an annual basis? How could the model be changed to be more helpful in evaluating your partnerships? We believe that this model is dynamic and each partnership should feel free to adapt it and add constructs (or categories) within each oval dimension that may be appropriate for your own partnership to evaluate and track over time. Finally, what is the most important lesson learned from your work with this partnership that might influence your decision to work with another partnership in the future? Thank you so much for the dialogue and evaluation of issues within the partnership. We hope this self-reflection and evaluation has been useful for your next steps. If you do create or re-create your own model and adapt the constructs/categories within each dimension to your own partnership, we’d love to hear from you. Send your adapted model and your insights to cpr.unm.edu. We’d love to post your model on our UNM Center for Participatory Research website to share with others if you are willing. Many thanks, Nina Wallerstein Producers of this Focus Group Guide: Julie Lucero, Lorenda Belone, Bonnie Duran, Greg Tafoya, Nina Wallerstein. Appreciation to oversight from the National Advisory Board of Think Tank of the CBPR Research and Evaluation Community of Practice: Margarita Alegria, Magdalena Avila, Elizabeth Baker, Beverly Becenti-Pigman, Charlotte Chung,
Which outcome(s) would you like to focus on now? Use the next question as probes: The two questions are more factual and may be answered more quickly. What was our starting point for this outcome? How well have we done so far? Where would we like to be [choose one: in one year, five years, or another time span]? What do we think are the best or promising practices to get there? Show 6: Outcomes We have a few final questions: How helpful has it been to use the model in evaluating your partnership and in reflecting about the issues in our partnership? Is this a process that would be helpful to do on an annual basis? How could the model be changed to be more helpful in evaluating your partnerships? We believe that this model is dynamic and each partnership should feel free to adapt it and add constructs (or categories) within each oval dimension that may be appropriate for your own partnership to evaluate and track over time. Finally, what is the most important lesson learned from your work with this partnership that might influence your decision to work with another partnership in the future? Thank you so much for the dialogue and evaluation of issues within the partnership. We hope this self-reflection and evaluation has been useful for your next steps. If you do create or re-create your own model and adapt the constructs/categories within each dimension to your own partnership, we’d love to hear from you. Send your adapted model and your insights to cpr.unm.edu. We’d love to post your model on our UNM Center for Participatory Research website to share with others if you are willing. Many thanks, Nina Wallerstein Producers of this Focus Group Guide: Julie Lucero, Lorenda Belone, Bonnie Duran, Greg Tafoya, Nina Wallerstein. Appreciation to oversight from the National Advisory Board of Think Tank of the CBPR Research and Evaluation Community of Practice: Margarita Alegria, Magdalena Avila, Elizabeth Baker, Beverly Becenti-Pigman, Charlotte Chung,
cbpr-model-eval-guide.docx