4 marks Accurate and reasonably 4 marks Effective evaluation detailed Effective use of material to address the Accurate and reasonably detailed question and provide informed description that demonstrates sound commentary. knowledge and understanding of Effective evaluation of research. research into conformity. Broad range of issues and / or There is appropriate selection of evidence in reasonable depth, or a material to address the question. narrower range in greater depth. Clear expression of ideas, good range of specialist terms, few errors of grammar, punctuation and spelling. 3 marks Less detailed but generally 3 marks Reasonable evaluation accurate Material is not always used effectively Less detailed but generally accurate but produces a reasonable description that demonstrates relevant commentary. knowledge and understanding. Reasonable evaluation of research. There is some evidence of selection of A range of issues and / or evidence in material to address the question. limited depth, or a narrower range in greater depth. Reasonable expression of ideas, a range of specialist terms, some errors of grammar, punctuation and spelling. 2 marks Basic 2 marks Basic evaluation Basic description that demonstrates The use of material provides only a some relevant knowledge and basic commentary. understanding but lacks detail and may Basic evaluation of research. be muddled. Superficial consideration of a restricted There is little evidence of selection of range of issues and / or evidence. material to address the question. Expression of ideas lacks clarity, some specialist terms used, errors of grammar, punctuation and spelling detract from clarity. 1 mark Very / flawed or 1 mark Rudimentary evaluation inappropriate The use of material provides only a Very brief or flawed description rudimentary commentary. demonstrating very little knowledge. Evaluation of research is just Selection and presentation of discernible or absent. information is largely or wholly Expression of ideas poor, few
4 marks Accurate and reasonably detailed Accurate and reasonably detailed description that demonstrates sound knowledge and understanding of research into conformity. There is appropriate selection of material to address the question. 4 marks Effective evaluation Effective use of material to address the question and provide informed commentary. Effective evaluation of research. Broad range of issues and / or evidence in reasonable depth, or a narrower range in greater depth. Clear expression of ideas, good range of specialist terms, few errors of grammar, punctuation and spelling. 3 marks Less detailed but generally accurate Less detailed but generally accurate description that demonstrates relevant knowledge and understanding. There is some evidence of selection of material to address the question. 3 marks Reasonable evaluation Material is not always used effectively but produces a reasonable commentary. Reasonable evaluation of research. A range of issues and / or evidence in limited depth, or a narrower range in greater depth. Reasonable expression of ideas, a range of specialist terms, some errors of grammar, punctuation and spelling. 2 marks Basic Basic description that demonstrates some relevant knowledge and understanding but lacks detail and may be muddled. There is little evidence of selection of material to address the question. 2 marks Basic evaluation The use of material provides only a basic commentary. Basic evaluation of research. Superficial consideration of a restricted range of issues and / or evidence. Expression of ideas lacks clarity, some specialist terms used, errors of grammar, punctuation and spelling detract from clarity. 1 mark Very / flawed or inappropriate Very brief or flawed description demonstrating very little knowledge. Selection and presentation of information is largely or wholly 1 mark Rudimentary evaluation The use of material provides only a rudimentary commentary. Evaluation of research is just discernible or absent. Expression of ideas poor, few
conformity.docx