please be thorough as you discuss both the strengths of your sermon and areas for improvement. ======================================================= 1. Biblical Content Score: *Discuss how the sermon communicates a clear and faithful understanding of the text. Where there any points at which stronger communication would have been helpful? *Discuss how the sermon communicates the central convictions of the Christian faith. Were there any points of ambiguity? *The application is faithful to the biblical and theological message of the text. Why do you think so? What might have made the application stronger? 2. Organization/Structure Score: *Introduction: Was a purposeful invitation into the sermon that immediately engaged the listener. Why do you think so? Could any changes or adjustments make the intro stronger? *Development: Was there recognizable and meaningful progression of thought with clear transitions? Why do you think so? Could any changes or adjustments make the development stronger and easier to follow? *Conclusion: Was a clear, decisive ending in support of the Sermon’s Function (no new information is introduced). Could any changes or adjustments make the conclusion stronger? * Sermon Title builds interest, reflects the focus of the sermon and is used effectively in the body of the sermon. Was that accomplished? Why do you think so? 3. Word Choice and Engaging Images and Illustrations Score: Purposeful, Clear, Rich use of language that engages the imagination and evokes emotion. Give examples of engaging use of language, word choice, metaphor or illustrations. 4.Non Verbal Communication Score:
please be thorough as you discuss both the strengths of your sermon and areas for improvement. ======================================================= 1. Biblical Content Score: *Discuss how the sermon communicates a clear and faithful understanding of the text. Where there any points at which stronger communication would have been helpful? *Discuss how the sermon communicates the central convictions of the Christian faith. Were there any points of ambiguity? *The application is faithful to the biblical and theological message of the text. Why do you think so? What might have made the application stronger? 2. Organization/Structure Score: *Introduction: Was a purposeful invitation into the sermon that immediately engaged the listener. Why do you think so? Could any changes or adjustments make the intro stronger? *Development: Was there recognizable and meaningful progression of thought with clear transitions? Why do you think so? Could any changes or adjustments make the development stronger and easier to follow? *Conclusion: Was a clear, decisive ending in support of the Sermon’s Function (no new information is introduced). Could any changes or adjustments make the conclusion stronger? * Sermon Title builds interest, reflects the focus of the sermon and is used effectively in the body of the sermon. Was that accomplished? Why do you think so? 3. Word Choice and Engaging Images and Illustrations Score: Purposeful, Clear, Rich use of language that engages the imagination and evokes emotion. Give examples of engaging use of language, word choice, metaphor or illustrations. 4.Non Verbal Communication Score:
COS-324-Mad-Fall-2019.docx