Table 3. Best-fitting parameter values and chi-square goodness-of-fit statistics for 3 models fit to the group ROC data reported by Rotello et al. (2005). Criterion Variability STREAK Model CDP Model Param Condition Param Condition Param Condition Neutral Conservative Neutral Conservative Neutral Conservative 1.68 1.77 2.32 2.56 c6 1.28 1.19 c6 c6 1.20 1.39 1.67 2.00 c5 0.92 0.94 c5 c5 0.82 1.08 1.15 1.54 c4 0.63 0.74 c4 c4 0.48 0.70 0.69 0.99 c3 0.37 0.48 c3 c3 0.05 0.27 0.08 0.36 c2 0.04 0.18 c2 c2 1.28 1.92 0.92 1.58 r 0.21 -0.12 µr r 0.96 0.74 0.81 0.70 dx 0.50 0.43 r μR1 1.15 1.16 0.78 0.96 dy 0.90 0.89 d μF1 1.33 1.51 1.48 1.98 s 0.76 0.68 Target R1 χ2 χ2 χ2 10.98 24.39 12.15 21.80 493.67 595.64 Figure Captions An illustration of the unequal-variance model of recognition memory. The Figure 1. distribution of memory strengths for targets has a higher mean and a higher variance that
Table 3. Best-fitting parameter values and chi-square goodness-of-fit statistics for 3 models fit to the group ROC data reported by Rotello et al. (2005). STREAK Criterion Variability Model CDP Model Param Condition Param Condition Param Condition Neutral Conservative Neutral Conservative Neutral Conservative c6 1.28 1.19 c6 1.68 1.77 c6 2.32 2.56 c5 0.92 0.94 c5 1.20 1.39 c5 1.67 2.00 c4 0.63 0.74 c4 0.82 1.08 c4 1.15 1.54 c3 0.37 0.48 c3 0.48 0.70 c3 0.69 0.99 c2 0.04 0.18 c2 0.05 0.27 c2 0.08 0.36 r 0.21 -0.12 µr 1.28 1.92 r 0.92 1.58 dx 0.50 0.43 r 0.96 0.74 μR1 0.81 0.70 dy 0.90 0.89 d 1.15 1.16 μF1 0.78 0.96 s 0.76 0.68 Target 1.33 1.51 R1 1.48 1.98 χ2 493.67 595.64 χ2 10.98 24.39 χ2 12.15 21.80 Figure Captions Figure 1. An illustration of the unequal-variance model of recognition memory. The distribution of memory strengths for targets has a higher mean and a higher variance that
CDP%20Model%20(final).docx