Is any guidance that discusses when we can use the de minimis exemption for controlled sources? I hear some folks around the state say they never accept de minimis determinations for controlled sources and others accept them with minimal or no monitoring/record keeping. The rule lists several options for items we might request and indicates the company must demonstrate that emissions didn’t exceed the thresholds, but it doesn’t talk about what is acceptable to us. I have seen records of parametric monitoring on the controls required, but I have also seen a simple one-time calculation using the manufacturer’s control efficiency be acceptable. I want to open it up to the group to see if there is guidance out there that I have not seen and to hear if other offices have a standard practice for approving these determinations eDoc 5 1:10:48 Updates on status and schedule Updates on Attachment & Correspondence Types Upgrade to Public Notice/Weekly Review Software 6 1:18:40 March 27 on, WRAPN off – “Notices” March 25 10:30AM-Noon DAPC Notices Training Webinar – – All notices from Stars2 changing to Notices that day 60+ interfaces – Confirmation of public notice publications will be accessed in Notices software OR public web page Publication dates will still be in Stars2 Newspaper contact work shifting to Legal DAPC still confirm draft notification done before progressing permit workflow Changes to Stars2: Entry of hearing dates Entry of short vs. long notices DAPC Public Notice Guidance - Coming LAA IT Issues 7 1:30:25 New Notices (a.k.a. WRAPN) user accounts for F5 and WebApps F5 Interface What issues do you have we can address? – Banner & Names F5 ITS Contact Mark Garner until June, then Dung Nguyen. – 8 Bonus Permitting Topic: 1:08:00 CDO has been working on an application for a new source which is subject to NSPS Subpart KKKK. The applicant included manufacturer’s guaranteed values for each pollutant and the NSPS establishes relevant standards for both NOX and SO2. The manufacturer’s guaranteed values for NOX and SO2 are lower (more restrictive) than the NSPS standards for NOX and SO2, so CDO has proposed assigning the more restrictive manufacturer’s guaranteed value
Is any guidance that discusses when we can use the de minimis exemption for controlled sources? I hear some folks around the state say they never accept de minimis determinations for controlled sources and others accept them with minimal or no monitoring/record keeping. The rule lists several options for items we might request and indicates the company must demonstrate that emissions didn’t exceed the thresholds, but it doesn’t talk about what is acceptable to us. I have seen records of parametric monitoring on the controls required, but I have also seen a simple one-time calculation using the manufacturer’s control efficiency be acceptable. I want to open it up to the group to see if there is guidance out there that I have not seen and to hear if other offices have a standard practice for approving these determinations 5 eDoc Updates on status and schedule Updates on Attachment & Correspondence Types 1:10:48 6 Upgrade to Public Notice/Weekly Review Software March 27 – “Notices” on, WRAPN off March 25 – 10:30AM-Noon – DAPC Notices Training Webinar All notices from Stars2 changing to Notices that day – 60+ interfaces Confirmation of public notice publications will be accessed in Notices software OR public web page Publication dates will still be in Stars2 Newspaper contact work shifting to Legal DAPC still confirm draft notification done before progressing permit workflow Changes to Stars2: Entry of hearing dates Entry of short vs. long notices DAPC Public Notice Guidance - Coming 1:18:40 7 LAA IT Issues New Notices (a.k.a. WRAPN) user accounts for F5 and WebApps F5 Interface – What issues do you have we can address? Banner & Names F5 ITS Contact – Mark Garner until June, then Dung Nguyen. 1:30:25 8 Bonus Permitting Topic: CDO has been working on an application for a new source which is subject to NSPS Subpart KKKK. The applicant included manufacturer’s guaranteed values for each pollutant and the NSPS establishes relevant standards for both NOX and SO2. The manufacturer’s guaranteed values for NOX and SO2 are lower (more restrictive) than the NSPS standards for NOX and SO2, so CDO has proposed assigning the more restrictive manufacturer’s guaranteed value 1:08:00
callsummary.docx