For Parks, Recreation, or If the bridge is 10 100 1 acre Project must result in no adverse effect – Refuge Sites, project will not to be a no effect or no determination, but adversely affect the features, demolished adverse effect property remains attributes or activities and/or replaced, determination via the eligible for NRHP. >100 Acres 1% of qualifying the property for Section 4(f) section 106 process. site Section 4f protection. applies. De Minimis Impact Independent Use of Historic Minor Involvement with Minor Involvement Transportation Bikeway or Bridges PE Parks, Recreation with Historic Sites Projects that have a Walk way Lands, and Wildlife and PE Net Benefit to Projects PE Waterfowl Refuges PE a Section 4f Property PE Coordination For Historic Properties, Official with If replacement Official with jurisdiction SHPO concurs in Official with Section 106 Consultation jurisdiction is proposed, the concurs in writing with writing with jurisdiction or and process utilized. concurs in bridge must be assessment of impacts assessment of SHPO/THPO Concurrence writing that made available and proposed mitigation. impacts and concurs in writing Requirements Officials with jurisdiction over project is for an proposed mitigation with assessment of the property (if historic, SHPO acceptable alternative use. impacts, proposed or THPO, and ACHP if and consistent mitigation, proposed participating) must be with SHPO concurs measures to informed of FHWA’s intent to designated in writing with minimize harm; make a finding of de minimis use of assessment of mitigation necessary impact, and they must concur property. impacts and to preserve, in writing in the assessment of proposed rehabilitate and project effects. mitigation. enhance those features and values of the Section 4(f) property; and that such measures will result in a net benefit to the Section 4(f) property.
For Parks, Recreation, or Refuge Sites, project will not adversely affect the features, attributes or activities qualifying the property for Section 4f protection. If the bridge is to be demolished and/or replaced, Section 4(f) applies. Project must result in a no effect or no adverse effect determination via the section 106 process. no adverse effect determination, but property remains eligible for NRHP. 10 – 100 1 acre >100 Acres 1% of site De Minimis Impact Independent Bikeway or Walk way Projects PE Use of Historic Bridges PE Minor Involvement with Parks, Recreation Lands, and Wildlife and Waterfowl Refuges PE Minor Involvement with Historic Sites PE Transportation Projects that have a Net Benefit to a Section 4f Property PE Coordination and Concurrence Requirements For Historic Properties, Section 106 Consultation process utilized. Officials with jurisdiction over the property (if historic, SHPO or THPO, and ACHP if participating) must be informed of FHWA’s intent to make a finding of de minimis impact, and they must concur in writing in the assessment of project effects. Official with jurisdiction concurs in writing that project is acceptable and consistent with designated use of property. If replacement is proposed, the bridge must be made available for an alternative use. SHPO concurs in writing with assessment of impacts and proposed mitigation. Official with jurisdiction concurs in writing with assessment of impacts and proposed mitigation. SHPO concurs in writing with assessment of impacts and proposed mitigation Official with jurisdiction or SHPO/THPO concurs in writing with assessment of impacts, proposed mitigation, proposed measures to minimize harm; mitigation necessary to preserve, rehabilitate and enhance those features and values of the Section 4(f) property; and that such measures will result in a net benefit to the Section 4(f) property.
comparisonchart.docx