Bowls Club current ownership (i.e. to the SW of the B4100) should also be noted, so that the context of the additional 100ha can be understood. 2.5 - Planning Policy Context Consultee Comments Response Warwickshire and WP/WMP welcome the inclusion of police facilities within the West Mercia Police proposed community hub. Coventry and Whilst the GLHSPD is supported by CWLEP, it is considered that Warwickshire LEP the document could be enhanced as follows: Direct reference to the strategic alignment of the proposed Noted. Text has been added at Section 1.1. development at Gaydon/Lighthorne Heath with the SEP. This is recommended to be incorporated at section 2.5 of the GLHSPD - Planning Policy Context. Chesterton and The content of Page 11 is exemplary of the brochure produced by Noted. Infrastructure delivery expectations are set Kingston Parish the developer for the GLH exhibition at Lighthorne School on out in the revised Section 6. Meeting 27/28 February. It is full of ifs, but and maybes, with nothing certain, explicit or definitive on housing, the village centre, schooling support, green infrastructure, pedestrian & cycle networks, bus services. This is pure marketing speak full of promises, but how, when, where and what will be delivered is totally unclear. Warwick District It should be noted that any forthcoming Developer Contributions Agreed. This is acknowledged in Section 3.4 of the Council SPD should include a reference to Strategic Highway contributions SPD. being required beyond the boundary of Stratford District in instances where it can be demonstrated that additional traffic pressure requires highway/junction improvements attributable to development within Stratford District (i.e. GLH putting additional pressure on the highway network within Warwick District). … Paragraph starting phased delivery’ should read - the phased This text is copied from the Core Strategy and any ‘The delivery of highway and transport infrastructure as set out in the changes would first have to be addressed in that Infrastructure Delivery Plan including further specific schemes that document. may be as necessary to mitigate local impacts both within Stratford District and, where proven, in neighbouring
Bowls Club current ownership (i.e. to the SW of the B4100) should also be noted, so that the context of the additional 100ha can be understood. 2.5 - Planning Policy Context Consultee Comments Response Warwickshire and West Mercia Police WP/WMP welcome the inclusion of police facilities within the proposed community hub. Coventry and Warwickshire LEP Whilst the GLHSPD is supported by CWLEP, it is considered that the document could be enhanced as follows: Direct reference to the strategic alignment of the proposed development at Gaydon/Lighthorne Heath with the SEP. This is recommended to be incorporated at section 2.5 of the GLHSPD - Planning Policy Context. Noted. Text has been added at Section 1.1. Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting The content of Page 11 is exemplary of the brochure produced by the developer for the GLH exhibition at Lighthorne School on 27/28 February. It is full of ifs, but and maybes, with nothing certain, explicit or definitive on housing, the village centre, schooling support, green infrastructure, pedestrian & cycle networks, bus services. This is pure marketing speak full of promises, but how, when, where and what will be delivered is totally unclear. Noted. Infrastructure delivery expectations are set out in the revised Section 6. Warwick District Council It should be noted that any forthcoming Developer Contributions SPD should include a reference to Strategic Highway contributions being required beyond the boundary of Stratford District in instances where it can be demonstrated that additional traffic pressure requires highway/junction improvements attributable to development within Stratford District (i.e. GLH putting additional pressure on the highway network within Warwick District). … Paragraph starting ‘The phased delivery’ should read - the phased delivery of highway and transport infrastructure as set out in the Infrastructure Delivery Plan including further specific schemes that may be as necessary to mitigate local impacts both within Stratford District and, where proven, in neighbouring Agreed. This is acknowledged in Section 3.4 of the SPD. This text is copied from the Core Strategy and any changes would first have to be addressed in that document.
Consultation%20Statement.docx