From: Describe Hundert’s “Although the resultant split success and ambition among the faculty” as outlined in this to one of section of text. Note “Not them seemed when/how Hundert unable to eat.“ uses first person and (pp. 178–180) possessive pronouns (“we”, “I”, “our”). Who does Hundert refer to as his (p. 179) and “all[ies]” how do these references further develop your understanding of him? had not even Based on context “I wanted [the pistol] clues, what do we when the irascible know about these demagogue Bell highlighted words had foisted it up on and how they me.” (p. 181) function together? How does the substitution of “easily angered” for irascible and “passionate political leader” for demagogue affect your understanding of the meaning of the sentence?
From: “Although the resultant split among the faculty” to “Not one of them seemed unable to eat.“ (pp. 178–180) Describe Hundert’s success and ambition as outlined in this section of text. Note when/how Hundert uses first person and possessive pronouns (“we”, “I”, “our”). Who does Hundert refer to as his “all[ies]” (p. 179) and how do these references further develop your understanding of him? “I had not even wanted [the pistol] when the irascible demagogue Bell had foisted it up on me.” (p. 181) Based on context clues, what do we know about these highlighted words and how they function together? How does the substitution of “easily angered” for irascible and “passionate political leader” for demagogue affect your understanding of the meaning of the sentence?
10.1.2.l6.docx