2016 Gas Well Workshop Continuing Education Course Evaluations No. What Did You Like About What Could be Improved? Should Continuing Other Comments Name the Course? Education be Offered in (Optional) the Future? On What Subjects? Course 101 Overview of Gas Well Deliquification Lead Instructor: Jim Hacksma – – 1 Easy to understand. The slides The professor followed the slides Yes were very informative and it was almost exactly. If you have the Whatever is relevant at the easily relatable to someone who book, I didn’t see a ton of time and add value. had never taken this material. advantage to hear the slides read aloud. 2 The instructor was very The slides were a bit information . Great class! Thank you! knowledgeable and able to dense. Too much info on answer all questions. CTO,CTR mode. More information on rod pump would have been good. 3 Very informative. Jim knew a Possible more hands-on Absolutely. This course as a Class participation in all lot, and all subjects covered engagement. Subject is at times general overview was workshops and classes. were covered in proper depth. dry and could use some Other classes looked Subjects are often dry and participation or engagement to interesting as well. technical. That is their nature, maintain focus. but would help greatly in retained learning. 4 The instructor is very The slides should match Yes. My time, and I learned a knowledgeable, the course is presentation; we spent a lot of time lot. Thank you. structured so that meaningful finding our place. information is presented a Don’t use green pointer, it hurts my large variety of topics related to eyes. GWD 5 It was very informative, and Nothing. Yes, if technology is covered many things not taught developed. in PE programs. 6 The general overview style that Less reading verbatim from the Yes. Case studies or coupled with an open forum for slides, more on HZ/ unconventional recommendations on some of further questions or discussion, experience and approaches. the topics that are less allowed for understanding prevalent would be nice topics without going into pages and pages of proofs and equations. 7 Jim was very thorough and Yes. knowledgeable. Lots of good discussion.
2016 Gas Well Workshop Continuing Education Course Evaluations No. What Did You Like About the Course? What Could be Improved? Should Continuing Education be Offered in the Future? On What Subjects? Other Comments Name (Optional) Course 101 – Overview of Gas Well Deliquification – Lead Instructor: Jim Hacksma 1 Easy to understand. The slides were very informative and it was easily relatable to someone who had never taken this material. The professor followed the slides almost exactly. If you have the book, I didn’t see a ton of advantage to hear the slides read aloud. Yes Whatever is relevant at the time and add value. 2 The instructor was very knowledgeable and able to answer all questions. The slides were a bit information dense. Too much info on CTO,CTR mode. More information on rod pump would have been good. . Great class! Thank you! 3 Very informative. Jim knew a lot, and all subjects covered were covered in proper depth. Possible more hands-on engagement. Subject is at times dry and could use some participation or engagement to maintain focus. Absolutely. This course as a general overview was Other classes looked interesting as well. Class participation in all workshops and classes. Subjects are often dry and technical. That is their nature, but would help greatly in retained learning. 4 The instructor is very knowledgeable, the course is structured so that meaningful information is presented a large variety of topics related to GWD The slides should match presentation; we spent a lot of time finding our place. Don’t use green pointer, it hurts my eyes. Yes. My time, and I learned a lot. Thank you. 5 It was very informative, and covered many things not taught in PE programs. Nothing. Yes, if technology is developed. 6 The general overview style that coupled with an open forum for further questions or discussion, allowed for understanding topics without going into pages and pages of proofs and equations. Less reading verbatim from the slides, more on HZ/ unconventional experience and approaches. Yes. Case studies or recommendations on some of the topics that are less prevalent would be nice 7 Jim was very thorough and knowledgeable. Lots of good discussion. Yes.
continueducationevaluation.docx