disarmament, demobilization and reintegration and on the status of humanitarian affairs in the country were also held in the framework of parliamentary activities. Training course for members of parliament on human rights and peace-building measure were also organized. Field visits to South Sudan were conducted by both Houses of Parliament, where MP's met with several members of the Southern Sudan Government and members of the Legislative Councils in the South to discuss and evaluate efforts relating to the status of implementation of the CPA. Conclusion This communication reveals that the Comprehensive Peace Agreement brought about tremendous political change in the political and economic structure of Sudan and produced many developments in the performance of the national Parliament, putting on his shoulders enormous amounts of responsibilities to play its role in transforming the provisions of the CPA into constitutional and legal provisions. This is in addition to the responsibility established by the CPA on the shoulders of the two legislatures in each of the States of Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile for the implementation of the popular consultation included in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. Mr Marc BOSC, President, thanked Mr Ibrahim Mohamed IBRAHIM for his communication and invited members present to put questions to him. Mr Alphonse K. NOMBRÉ (Burkina Faso) asked how this agreement and its implementation had worked out following the independence of South Sudan. Mr Mahamat HASSAN BRÉMÉ (Chad) thanked and congratulated Mr IBRAHIM. He asked about the situation in South Sudan at the moment the agreement had been signed. He thought that some bodies had been pointlessly duplicated and that the separation of powers appeared biased, and he asked for clarification on these subjects. Mr Shah Sultan AKIFI (Afghanistan) asked Mr IBRAHIM about the constitutional court and its competences. recalled the management of the crisis in Mr Socrates SOCRATOUS (Cyprus) Cyprus after the Turkish invasion in 1984, and asked if Parliament had been involved in the management of humanitarian situations. Mrs Jacqueline BIESHEUVEL-VERMEIJDEN (Netherlands) what the relations were between the Council of States and the different national commissions and who took the final decisions. Mr Md. Mahfuzur RAHMAN (Bangladesh) asked how the competences of the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court were defined. Mr Manuel CAVERO GOMEZ (Spain) asked about the way in which the national commissions had been established and tasks had been allocated to them.
disarmament, demobilization and reintegration and on the status of humanitarian affairs in the country were also held in the framework of parliamentary activities. Training course for members of parliament on human rights and peace-building measure were also organized. Field visits to South Sudan were conducted by both Houses of Parliament, where MP's met with several members of the Southern Sudan Government and members of the Legislative Councils in the South to discuss and evaluate efforts relating to the status of implementation of the CPA. Conclusion This communication reveals that the Comprehensive Peace Agreement brought about tremendous political change in the political and economic structure of Sudan and produced many developments in the performance of the national Parliament, putting on his shoulders enormous amounts of responsibilities to play its role in transforming the provisions of the CPA into constitutional and legal provisions. This is in addition to the responsibility established by the CPA on the shoulders of the two legislatures in each of the States of Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile for the implementation of the popular consultation included in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. Mr Marc BOSC, President, thanked Mr Ibrahim Mohamed IBRAHIM for his communication and invited members present to put questions to him. Mr Alphonse K. NOMBRÉ (Burkina Faso) asked how this agreement and its implementation had worked out following the independence of South Sudan. Mr Mahamat HASSAN BRÉMÉ (Chad) thanked and congratulated Mr IBRAHIM. He asked about the situation in South Sudan at the moment the agreement had been signed. He thought that some bodies had been pointlessly duplicated and that the separation of powers appeared biased, and he asked for clarification on these subjects. Mr Shah Sultan AKIFI (Afghanistan) asked Mr IBRAHIM about the constitutional court and its competences. Mr Socrates SOCRATOUS (Cyprus) recalled the management of the crisis in Cyprus after the Turkish invasion in 1984, and asked if Parliament had been involved in the management of humanitarian situations. Mrs Jacqueline BIESHEUVEL-VERMEIJDEN (Netherlands) what the relations were between the Council of States and the different national commissions and who took the final decisions. Mr Md. Mahfuzur RAHMAN (Bangladesh) asked how the competences of the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court were defined. Mr Manuel CAVERO GOMEZ (Spain) asked about the way in which the national commissions had been established and tasks had been allocated to them.
CCQGBNKSOYJWDYXQLTFSVZGVTCISRG_0.docx