for products falling under this PT. Only 17% of the products would apply for UA. 3 For all PTs falling 15% A high percentage 1 2 + 2 5 + 4 main group 1, UA is of products will be family families families perceived as a valid placed on the alternative to NA+MR. market under BPFs rather than as separate products. According to the AISE/EBPF survey 60% of dossiers will 8 AS be BPF. 4 For all PTs falling under 40% A high percentage 1 + 1 4 + 4 7 + 8 main group 1, UA is of products will be families families families perceived as a valid placed on the alternative to NA+MR. market under BPFs rather than as separate products. According to the 15 AS AISE/EBPF survey
for products falling under this PT. Only 17% of the products would apply for UA. 8 AS 3 For all PTs falling main group 1, UA is perceived as a valid alternative to NA+MR. 15% A high percentage of products will be placed on the market under BPFs rather than as separate products. According to the AISE/EBPF survey 60% of dossiers will be BPF. 1 family 2 + 2 families 5 + 4 families 15 AS 4 For all PTs falling under main group 1, UA is perceived as a valid alternative to NA+MR. 40% A high percentage of products will be placed on the market under BPFs rather than as separate products. According to the AISE/EBPF survey 1 + 1 families 4 + 4 families 7 + 8 families
CA-May16-Doc.7.8%20-%20BPR%20fee%20model%20final%20report.docx