model reviewed and reformed with assessment adjusted system, service outcome fees could then fees? be weighted proportionately like the outcome fees. Improved Discussion Point We support a review of Gateway and 16: Improving the assessments Assessment Gateway but believe this Process should not be How can rushed and gateway should be on real costs and study in a be cohort improved with controls to enable to prove the a better assessment tool before it is to deployed. The connection of the assessment to risk services supports for should be people based on a real with costs study. The context of assessments (skilled assessors, face to face, timeliness) should be addressed with increased
model with outcome fees? reviewed and reformed assessment system, service fees could then be weighted proportionately like the outcome fees. Improved Gateway and Assessment Process Discussion Point 16: Improving the Gateway How can gateway be improved to enable a better to services for people with We support a review of assessments but believe this should not be rushed and should be on real costs and study in a cohort with controls to prove the assessment tool before it is deployed. The connection of the assessment to risk adjusted supports should be based on a real costs study. The context of assessments (skilled assessors, face to face, timeliness) should be addressed with increased
CoAct-Final-Response-to-Discussion-Paper.docx