218 Commerce Street (LPHI). Based on this conduct, Lead Plaintiff P.O. Box 4160 asserted claims against the MidFirst Defendants Montgomery, AL 36104 for breach of contract (against Midland); breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing 334 269-2343 (Ph.) 334 954-7555 (Fax) (against Midland); and unjust enrichment (against Midland and Firstinsure). The Class Period is from 6-6-2008 through the Preliminary Approval Date. 1-30-2015 10-CV-00804 (E.D. Pa.) Hawk Valley, Inc. v. Elaine G. Taylor, et al. 8-6-2015 For more information write to: Fax-recipient-plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated the federal Telephone Consumer § J. Wanca Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227, by faxing Anderson + Wanca advertisements to the Class without their prior 3701 Algonquin Road express invitations or permission to do so. The Suite 760 Defendants sent one or more faxes on or about Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 1-30-2015 13-CV-01037 (N.D. Cal.) Denis Mulligan, et al. v. Impax Laboratories, Not set For more information Inc., et al. yet write to: Securities-purchaser-plaintiffs allege Daniel S. Sommers violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Christopher Lometti § Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. Joshua M. Kolsky 78j(b) and 78t(a) (the Act”), and Rule “Exchange Genevieve O. Fontan 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC Securities and Exchange Commission. Lead 1100 New York Ave, N.W. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants either East Suite 500 knowingly or recklessly made false and/or Washington, D.C. 20005 misleading statements to the public concerning Impax’s ability to correct deficiencies cited by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). Lead Plaintiff alleges further that disclosure of the truth caused a drop in the share price of the Company’s common stock. The Class Period is from 6-6-2011 to 3-4-2013.
(LPHI). Based on this conduct, Lead Plaintiff asserted claims against the MidFirst Defendants for breach of contract (against Midland); breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing (against Midland); and unjust enrichment (against Midland and Firstinsure). The Class Period is from 6-6-2008 through the Preliminary Approval Date. 218 Commerce Street P.O. Box 4160 Montgomery, AL 36104 334 269-2343 (Ph.) 334 954-7555 (Fax) 1-30-2015 10-CV-00804 (E.D. Pa.) Hawk Valley, Inc. v. Elaine G. Taylor, et al. Fax-recipient-plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, by faxing advertisements to the Class without their prior express invitations or permission to do so. The Defendants sent one or more faxes on or about 8-6-2015 For more information write to: J. Wanca Anderson + Wanca 3701 Algonquin Road Suite 760 Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 1-30-2015 13-CV-01037 (N.D. Cal.) Denis Mulligan, et al. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., et al. Securities-purchaser-plaintiffs allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 78t(a) (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Lead Plaintiff alleges that Defendants either knowingly or recklessly made false and/or misleading statements to the public concerning Impax’s ability to correct deficiencies cited by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). Lead Plaintiff alleges further that disclosure of the truth caused a drop in the share price of the Company’s common stock. The Class Period is from 6-6-2011 to 3-4-2013. Not set yet For more information write to: Daniel S. Sommers Christopher Lometti Joshua M. Kolsky Genevieve O. Fontan Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC 1100 New York Ave, N.W. East Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20005
CAFA-Notice-January-2015.docx