Every decision made can and will impact the unit’s operational readiness. The impact will be positive or negative on a unit’s ability to perform the intended mission. To better understand the impact a risk decision will have on readiness, each mission must be broken down into logical segments. (ON SLIDE #99) (2) Part 2: Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) Once the mission has been broken down into logical segments, the hazards associated with each segment need to be identified and listed in a logical order as they pertain to that segment of the mission. The identification of hazards during the PHA will require 30-40% of the total ORM time and resources in order to complete an accurate analysis of hazards associated with the mission. It is important to note that if all detectable hazards have not been identified, then unnecessary risks are being accepted. (ON SLIDE #100) (3) Part 3: Brainstorming If” scenarios “What All individuals responsible for any phase or segment of the operation will be involved in the brainstorming process. The brainstorming process must be conducted with common sense thinking and the hazards should pertain to the mission. For example a meteor falling to Earth during a construction project is possible, but this will happen whether there a construction project or not, so this hazard does not need to be listed, but a person getting crushed by a piece of equipment is also possible but is directly related to the project. (ON SLIDE #101) (4) Part 4: Change Analysis Every mission has events occur that are planned and unplanned. Planned events are evaluated throughout the ORM process. Unplanned events that occur can change the structure of the original plan and will need to be evaluated during the change analysis. A change analysis focuses on the differences between the original plan and the revised plan and how the differences will affect the safety of everyone involved in the mission. An example would be if you and several of your peers were going to a
Every decision made can and will impact the unit’s operational readiness. The impact will be positive or negative on a unit’s ability to perform the intended mission. To better understand the impact a risk decision will have on readiness, each mission must be broken down into logical segments. (ON SLIDE #99) (2) Part 2: Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) Once the mission has been broken down into logical segments, the hazards associated with each segment need to be identified and listed in a logical order as they pertain to that segment of the mission. The identification of hazards during the PHA will require 30-40% of the total ORM time and resources in order to complete an accurate analysis of hazards associated with the mission. It is important to note that if all detectable hazards have not been identified, then unnecessary risks are being accepted. (ON SLIDE #100) (3) Part 3: Brainstorming “What If” scenarios All individuals responsible for any phase or segment of the operation will be involved in the brainstorming process. The brainstorming process must be conducted with common sense thinking and the hazards should pertain to the mission. For example a meteor falling to Earth during a construction project is possible, but this will happen whether there a construction project or not, so this hazard does not need to be listed, but a person getting crushed by a piece of equipment is also possible but is directly related to the project. (ON SLIDE #101) (4) Part 4: Change Analysis Every mission has events occur that are planned and unplanned. Planned events are evaluated throughout the ORM process. Unplanned events that occur can change the structure of the original plan and will need to be evaluated during the change analysis. A change analysis focuses on the differences between the original plan and the revised plan and how the differences will affect the safety of everyone involved in the mission. An example would be if you and several of your peers were going to a
Completed%20DO%20Ground%20Safety_ORM%20FEB%202012.docx