a) it is on a separate title; and on the VHR. It is possible for a place to be protected under an HO as well as on the VHR. b) the entire UL Daly Nature Reserve has been nominated to the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR). 10.2 Gisborne Park (proposed HO280) The inclusion of the place in the HO is recommended on No change should be nominated to Heritage merit. Nomination for State level protection is a separate Reference to Victoria for State level heritage process and not precluded by its inclusion in the local property at 2 protection as recommended in the planning scheme. Cabbage Tree Macedon Ranges Cultural Heritage Lane, The 1994 Study provided no evidence or argument for State and Landscape Study 1994 Gisborne. HO level listing. The consultant’s assessment, based on further 280. information developed for this Citation, is that local level protection is appropriate. 10.3 New Gisborne Avenue of Honour The New Gisborne Avenue of Honour is of local heritage No change (proposed should not have the value and is worthy of HO protection and recognition. Reference to HO applied; there are two other New Gisborne The other avenues in the Gisborne environs have been avenues of trees that are more Avenue of degraded over the years and do not reflect the continuity of worthy of recognition. Honour. trees, parallel planting creating the avenue and visual impact. HO304. Their partial existence as fragments does not merit heritage recognition. There are other landscape/vegetation overlays in the Planning Scheme which could provide landscape protection for those fragmented avenues. 11 Residents’ Overall: Supports the intent of the Sections 1 to 5 of the submission include a number of general group amendment but claims are concerns with the methodology and accuracy of the deficiencies and inconsistencies in These are responded to under 11.1 to 11.10 below. MRRA the which is the strategic basis Study In places Sections 1 to 5 include summaries of specific for it. Requests a review of the Study requests that are detailed in Section 6 on specific sites; and its implementation through responses to these are made later in this table as C118, as well as specific changes to appropriate. individual citations and HO controls.
a) it is on a separate title; and b) the entire UL Daly Nature Reserve has been nominated to the Victorian Heritage Register (VHR). on the VHR. It is possible for a place to be protected under an HO as well as on the VHR. 10.2 Reference to property at 2 Cabbage Tree Lane, Gisborne. HO 280. Gisborne Park (proposed HO280) should be nominated to Heritage Victoria for State level heritage protection as recommended in the Macedon Ranges Cultural Heritage and Landscape Study 1994 The inclusion of the place in the HO is recommended on merit. Nomination for State level protection is a separate process and not precluded by its inclusion in the local planning scheme. The 1994 Study provided no evidence or argument for State level listing. The consultant’s assessment, based on further information developed for this Citation, is that local level protection is appropriate. No change 10.3 Reference to New Gisborne Avenue of Honour. HO304. New Gisborne Avenue of Honour (proposed should not have the HO applied; there are two other avenues of trees that are more worthy of recognition. The New Gisborne Avenue of Honour is of local heritage value and is worthy of HO protection and recognition. The other avenues in the Gisborne environs have been degraded over the years and do not reflect the continuity of trees, parallel planting creating the avenue and visual impact. Their partial existence as fragments does not merit heritage recognition. There are other landscape/vegetation overlays in the Planning Scheme which could provide landscape protection for those fragmented avenues. No change 11 Residents’ group MRRA Overall: Supports the intent of the amendment but claims are deficiencies and inconsistencies in the Study which is the strategic basis for it. Requests a review of the Study and its implementation through C118, as well as specific changes to individual citations and HO controls. Sections 1 to 5 of the submission include a number of general concerns with the methodology and accuracy of the These are responded to under 11.1 to 11.10 below. In places Sections 1 to 5 include summaries of specific requests that are detailed in Section 6 on specific sites; responses to these are made later in this table as appropriate.
10.-summary-of-submissions-with-council-officer-response-and-recommended-changes-as-attached-to-council-report-25-07-2018.docx