(2012) ... 36 , ... 38 cert. denied, ... 33, 36 ... 34 ... 43 ... 38 *iii ... 31, 32 , ... 39 cert. denied, ... 22 ... 34, 35 ... 37 Massachusetts General Laws ... 26, 27 Chapter 265, Section 1 ... 3 ... 31 Rules ... 31 ... 42, 43 ... 31 ... 22 ... 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 31 ... 33, 36 Authorities ... 33 30B Mass.Prac., Criminal Practice and ... 43 Procedure§11.11 (3d ed. 2011) ... 33 ... 44 *1 ISSUES PRESENTED ) ... 44 I. Whether the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in determining to sequester the jury on day ten of trial, during deliberations, and after the last ... 43 alternate juror had been seated. ... 44 II. Whether the defendant's new trial motion was properly denied where a new trial would not be the *iv ... 34 proper remedy for any public trial violation that occurred solely during sentencing, and further, ... 39 whether any such violation occurred due to security
(2012) ... 36 ... 33, 36 ... 43 *iii ... 31, 32 ... 22 ... 37 ... 26, 27 ... 31 ... 31 ... 31 ... 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 33, 36 ... 33 ... 43 ... 44 ) ... 44 ... 43 ... 44 *iv ... 34 ... 39 , cert. denied, ... 38 ... 34 ... 38 , cert. denied, ... 39 ... 34, 35 Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 265, Section 1 ... 3 Rules ... 42, 43 ... 22 ... 31 Authorities 30B Mass.Prac., Criminal Practice and Procedure§11.11 (3d ed. 2011) ... 33 *1 ISSUES PRESENTED I. Whether the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in determining to sequester the jury on day ten of trial, during deliberations, and after the last alternate juror had been seated. II. Whether the defendant's new trial motion was properly denied where a new trial would not be the proper remedy for any public trial violation that occurred solely during sentencing, and further, whether any such violation occurred due to security
Commonwealth-of-Massachusetts-v.-SOK-Brief-for-the-Commonwealth.docx