TN9 2LP 1.85% Unknown 1.85% Question 1: Response percentage against postcode An analysis was carried out of post codes in the TN9 2- - area, which would include all properties directly affected by the proposed scheme, i.e. fronting directly onto the proposed shared use facility. Please also see 4.2.2 and 4.2.3. Question 3: To what extent do you agree or disagree with our proposal to provide a new use’ pedestrian/cycle route along Vauxhall ‘shared Lane, Pembury Road, St Stephen’s Street and Priory Road to Quarry Hill Road 35.19% of those that responded to the survey strongly disagree with the proposed scheme against 31.48% of those who strongly agree. 18.52% said they tended to agree against a figure of 9.29% who tended to disagree. 5.56% of those surveyed said they neither agreed nor disagreed. Extent of agreement Number Strongly Agree 17 Tend to Agree 10 Neither Agree nor Disagree 1 Not declared 2 Tend to Disagree 5 Strongly Disagree 19 Total respondents 54
TN9 2LP 1.85% Unknown 1.85% Question 1: Response percentage against postcode An analysis was carried out of post codes in the TN9 2- - area, which would include all properties directly affected by the proposed scheme, i.e. fronting directly onto the proposed shared use facility. Please also see 4.2.2 and 4.2.3. Question 3: To what extent do you agree or disagree with our proposal to provide a new ‘shared use’ pedestrian/cycle route along Vauxhall Lane, Pembury Road, St Stephen’s Street and Priory Road to Quarry Hill Road 35.19% of those that responded to the survey strongly disagree with the proposed scheme against 31.48% of those who strongly agree. 18.52% said they tended to agree against a figure of 9.29% who tended to disagree. 5.56% of those surveyed said they neither agreed nor disagreed. Extent of agreement Number Strongly Agree 17 Tend to Agree 10 Neither Agree nor Disagree 1 Not declared 2 Tend to Disagree 5 Strongly Disagree 19 Total respondents 54
Consultation_Report_final.docx