The Highways Agency will have an interest in the design of Accepted. the proposed landscape bund adjacent to the motorway boundary. Accepted text added accordingly. – It should be noted that the provision of interceptor drainage will be necessary to ensure that there is no surface water from the bund onto the motorway as there must be no — discharge of interceptor drainage into the motorway surface water drainage system. Lighthorne Parish There is much use of but no detail what Comments noted. No specific change to the SPD is ‘should’ — Council exactly will be done and where? How will Lighthorne be considered necessary. protected from noise generated from the new settlement? What guarantees are given that the land movements required for the noise bund won’t fundamentally and irrevocably change the topography of this historic area? There is insufficient detail to be able to comment meaningfully. Chesterton and The bund will be totally inadequate based on the topography Noise is acknowledged as a significant factor and the Kingston Parish Meeting of the site. What happens at the northern tip of the bund? The SPD sets out clearly the standards against which the noise problem on the site will be a major factor. proposed mitigation will be judged. Gaydon Parish Council We have already stated that we regard as essential the noise The bund is proposed as extending to the southern bund protecting part of the site from noise pollution to be boundary of the site. extended southwards to abut the B4451. In addition, given the close proximity of the new road to the village we would matters relate to the public highway that is require mitigation measures to protect the village from noise, already under construction and are outside the scope air and light pollution emanating from this. of the SPD. 3.10 - Air Quality
The Highways Agency will have an interest in the design of the proposed landscape bund adjacent to the motorway boundary. It should be noted that the provision of interceptor drainage will be necessary to ensure that there is no surface water from the bund onto the motorway — as there must be no discharge of interceptor drainage into the motorway surface water drainage system. Accepted. Accepted – text added accordingly. Lighthorne Parish Council There is much use of ‘should’ but no detail — what exactly will be done and where? How will Lighthorne be protected from noise generated from the new settlement? What guarantees are given that the land movements required for the noise bund won’t fundamentally and irrevocably change the topography of this historic area? There is insufficient detail to be able to comment meaningfully. Comments noted. No specific change to the SPD is considered necessary. Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting The bund will be totally inadequate based on the topography of the site. What happens at the northern tip of the bund? The noise problem on the site will be a major factor. Noise is acknowledged as a significant factor and the SPD sets out clearly the standards against which the proposed mitigation will be judged. Gaydon Parish Council We have already stated that we regard as essential the noise bund protecting part of the site from noise pollution to be extended southwards to abut the B4451. In addition, given the close proximity of the new road to the village we would require mitigation measures to protect the village from noise, air and light pollution emanating from this. The bund is proposed as extending to the southern boundary of the site. matters relate to the public highway that is already under construction and are outside the scope of the SPD. 3.10 - Air Quality
Consultation%20Statement.docx