Microlife BPA Algorithm only (based on 97 (81.4-100) 90 (83.8-94.2) Wiesel et al., 201461 200 pulse irregularity) Omron M6 Algorithm only on 100 94 Marazzi et al., 201260 pulse irregularity) Omron M6 Algorithm only (based on 30 97 Wiesel et al., 201461 comfort pulse irregularity) (15.4-49.1) (92.5-99.2) Microlife Algorithm only on 94.9 89.7 (87.5-91.6) Kearley et al., 201456 WatchBP pulse irregularity) Plethysmographs Finger probe Algorithm only on 100 91.9 Lewis et al., 201162 pulse irregularity) iPhone Algorithm only (based on 97.0 93.5 ¶McManus et al., pulse irregularity) 201663 LEGEND: The comparator for all studies was 12-lead ECG (¶also used 3-lead telemetry).
Microlife BPA 200 Algorithm only (based on pulse irregularity) 97 (81.4-100) 90 (83.8-94.2) Wiesel et al., 201461 Omron M6 Algorithm only on pulse irregularity) 100 94 Marazzi et al., 201260 Omron M6 comfort Algorithm only (based on pulse irregularity) 30 (15.4-49.1) 97 (92.5-99.2) Wiesel et al., 201461 Microlife WatchBP Algorithm only on pulse irregularity) 94.9 89.7 (87.5-91.6) Kearley et al., 201456 Plethysmographs Finger probe Algorithm only on pulse irregularity) 100 91.9 Lewis et al., 201162 iPhone Algorithm only (based on pulse irregularity) 97.0 93.5 ¶McManus et al., 201663 LEGEND: The comparator for all studies was 12-lead ECG (¶also used 3-lead telemetry).
Circulation%20final%2028.2%20clean%20without%20Endnote%20fields.docx