Good ability to express ideas in own words. Focuses on the topic Describes, explains, defines, Shows evidence of Adequate voice. Audience is engaged by a Limited choice and use compares and contrasts the some relevant limited of devices of supporting materials Identifies, deals with and i.e. Overall basic concepts/ areas with reading. Supports which may include only and e.g. Video demonstrates and though pace of which the presentation subject is most points with two or three of the extract, tape recording, understanding of most of verbal delivery concerned. Occasionally examples from following:- OHP, powerpoint, 50 59 the basic concepts/ areas and/or volume may – description or explanation may reading and, slides etc. Other with which the be inappropriate. eye contact, reference to not be clear or thorough enough, occasionally, media may have been presentation subject is shared experiences, or there may not be appropriate experience more appropriate for concerned. Occasionally written and visual or sufficient attempts to compare the presentation include some minor Shows ability to materials, attention to and contrast. Arguments are not subject matter irrelevancies. summarise though differences in learning all systematically or coherently may be rather styles developed. dependent on language of source material Some failure to focus on Usually adequately describes Shows evidence of Poor use of Limited audience Limited choice and the topic at times. Shows and explains basic concepts/ limited reading, but engagement. Almost total inappropriate use of i.e. Lacks clarity. some understanding of the areas with which the sources used may reliance on one of the supporting materials topic. May have omitted presentation subject is be limited, or basic, range of devices which and media e.g. Video 41 - 49 Pace and volume of some basic concepts/ concerned, though explanations or some major might have been included extract, tape recording, verbal delivery are areas or included are not always clear. Some sources which are e.g. eye contact, OHP, powerpoint, unsuitable for the attempts to compare and central to the environment. reference to shared slides etc. unimportant areas. Is not contrast ideas or information but subject may have experiences, written and always relevant largely descriptive. been omitted. visual materials, attention to differences in learning Supports some styles. Presentation points in the almost entirely read from presentation with a script. examples from reading/experience but may be badly chosen. Very limited ability to summarise
Good ability to express ideas in own words. 50 – 59 Focuses on the topic Identifies, deals with and demonstrates and understanding of most of the basic concepts/ areas with which the presentation subject is concerned. Occasionally include some minor irrelevancies. Describes, explains, defines, compares and contrasts the basic concepts/ areas with which the presentation subject is concerned. Occasionally description or explanation may not be clear or thorough enough, or there may not be appropriate or sufficient attempts to compare and contrast. Arguments are not all systematically or coherently developed. Shows evidence of some relevant reading. Supports most points with examples from reading and, occasionally, experience Shows ability to summarise though may be rather dependent on language of source material Adequate voice. i.e. Overall though pace of verbal delivery and/or volume may be inappropriate. Audience is engaged by a limited of devices which may include only two or three of the following:- eye contact, reference to shared experiences, written and visual materials, attention to differences in learning styles Limited choice and use of supporting materials and e.g. Video extract, tape recording, OHP, powerpoint, slides etc. Other media may have been more appropriate for the presentation subject matter 41 - 49 Some failure to focus on the topic at times. Shows some understanding of the topic. May have omitted some basic concepts/ areas or included unimportant areas. Is not always relevant Usually adequately describes and explains basic concepts/ areas with which the presentation subject is concerned, though explanations are not always clear. Some attempts to compare and contrast ideas or information but largely descriptive. Shows evidence of limited reading, but sources used may be limited, or basic, or some major sources which are central to the subject may have been omitted. Supports some points in the presentation with examples from reading/experience but may be badly chosen. Very limited ability to summarise Poor use of i.e. Lacks clarity. Pace and volume of verbal delivery are unsuitable for the environment. Limited audience engagement. Almost total reliance on one of the range of devices which might have been included e.g. eye contact, reference to shared experiences, written and visual materials, attention to differences in learning styles. Presentation almost entirely read from a script. Limited choice and inappropriate use of supporting materials and media e.g. Video extract, tape recording, OHP, powerpoint, slides etc.
Copa-FSN2014-15.docx