Which indices are the most reliable indicators of changes in fitness? Which reliable indicators of changes in fitness best describe the changes caused by deconditioning? How does training in microgravity differ from training in 1-G ? What are the differences between training that includes impact forces and training that uses non-impact forces? Can an artificial intelligence expert system be developed to aid in monitoring, controlling, and adjusting prescriptions? How does inflight exercise training affect the adaptation process? muscle groups are critical in the performance of egress, landing, and EVAs? 9. Which of the indicators of microgravity-induced change in muscle function can be correlated with possible difficulty in performing egress, landing, and EVAs? These are few of the questions to be answer to understand the possible countermeasures to be efficient. On Wednesday, September 20, 1989, the following 23 topics were suggested by members of the Biomechanics group, of which I was one of the members: Identify and analyze tasks by mission. Focus studies to examine the functions of upper extremities during space flight. Integration of Biomechanics and Physiology to understand "the complete picture." Examine the use of power tools to enhance performance and reduce fatigue of the crew members. Compare the use of a robotic hand to EVA crew interaction. Investigate "tweaking" existing to a give a greater mechanical advantage. Use of the prediction of work and tools required to perform a given task. What jobs/tasks are needed on orbit? What are the energy expenditures for on orbit activity. Comparison of perceived target accuracy and spatial orientation to actual target accuracy and spatial orientation. Comparison of tasks to fine motor control. Quantify performance of metabolism, muscles, forces, etc. Determination of the scope of biomechanics operations vs. those of medical science. Evaluation of muscle, EMC, etc. of crew members. Evaluation of hormones and metabolic information. Investigation of hardware issues such as the development of a universal tool. Integration of protocols including recovery, strength, power, endurance, and frequency. Development of work related tests incorporating dynamometers, force plates, etc. definition of specified joint axes.
Which indices are the most reliable indicators of changes in fitness? Which reliable indicators of changes in fitness best describe the changes caused by deconditioning? How does training in microgravity differ from training in 1-G ? What are the differences between training that includes impact forces and training that uses non-impact forces? Can an artificial intelligence expert system be developed to aid in monitoring, controlling, and adjusting prescriptions? How does inflight exercise training affect the adaptation process? muscle groups are critical in the performance of egress, landing, and EVAs? 9. Which of the indicators of microgravity-induced change in muscle function can be correlated with possible difficulty in performing egress, landing, and EVAs? These are few of the questions to be answer to understand the possible countermeasures to be efficient. On Wednesday, September 20, 1989, the following 23 topics were suggested by members of the Biomechanics group, of which I was one of the members: Identify and analyze tasks by mission. Focus studies to examine the functions of upper extremities during space flight. Integration of Biomechanics and Physiology to understand "the complete picture." Examine the use of power tools to enhance performance and reduce fatigue of the crew members. Compare the use of a robotic hand to EVA crew interaction. Investigate "tweaking" existing to a give a greater mechanical advantage. Use of the prediction of work and tools required to perform a given task. What jobs/tasks are needed on orbit? What are the energy expenditures for on orbit activity. Comparison of perceived target accuracy and spatial orientation to actual target accuracy and spatial orientation. Comparison of tasks to fine motor control. Quantify performance of metabolism, muscles, forces, etc. Determination of the scope of biomechanics operations vs. those of medical science. Evaluation of muscle, EMC, etc. of crew members. Evaluation of hormones and metabolic information. Investigation of hardware issues such as the development of a universal tool. Integration of protocols including recovery, strength, power, endurance, and frequency. Development of work related tests incorporating dynamometers, force plates, etc. definition of specified joint axes.
Chapter%2016-NASA-4-2-11.docx