§ U.S.C. 227, et seq. (the by making “TCPA”) automated and/or prerecorded collection calls to cell phones without the prior express consent of Plaintiffs or the putative class members. 12-13-2017 12-CV-711 (D.N.J.) In re: Ductile Iron Pipe Fittings (“DIPE”) Not set For more inforamtion Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation yet write to: The lawsuit alleges that: (i) defendants entered into price-fixing agreements in the Kit A PPierson Cohen ilstein Sellers & Toll alleged market for Open-Spec Ductile Iron Pipe PLLC Fittings (“DIPE”) in the United States in 1100 New York Avenue, NW violation of the antitrust laws; (ii) McWane Suite 500 West monopolized the alleged market for Domestic Washington, DC 20005 DIPF in the United States in violation of the antitrust laws; and (iii) SIGMA and McWane conspired to restrain trade and to monopolize the alleged market for Domestic DIPF in the United States in violation of the antitrust laws. The lawsuit claims that, as a result, plaintiffs paid more for Open-Spec DIPF and Domestic DIPF purchased from defendants than they otherwise would have paid. 12-14-2017 16-CV-3402 (E.D. Mich.) In re: Auto Parts Antitrust Litigation (Body Not set For more inforamtion 16-CV-3403 Sealing Products) yet write to: Re Defendants: Nishikawa Rubber Co., Ltd. (“NRC”), Nishikawa Cooper LLC (“NISCO”) and Cotchett, & McCarthy LLP Nishikawa of America, Inc. (“NOA”) San Francisco Airport Office (collectively, “Nishikawa”) Center Plaintiffs allege that numerous federal and 840 Malcolm Road state law claims based on the alleged Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 price fixing and market allocation of the automotive rubber body sealing products Robins Kaplan LLP
U.S.C. § 227, et seq. (the “TCPA”) by making automated and/or prerecorded collection calls to cell phones without the prior express consent of Plaintiffs or the putative class members. 12-13-2017 12-CV-711 (D.N.J.) In re: Ductile Iron Pipe Fittings (“DIPE”) Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation The lawsuit alleges that: (i) defendants entered into price-fixing agreements in the alleged market for Open-Spec Ductile Iron Pipe Fittings (“DIPE”) in the United States in violation of the antitrust laws; (ii) McWane monopolized the alleged market for Domestic DIPF in the United States in violation of the antitrust laws; and (iii) SIGMA and McWane conspired to restrain trade and to monopolize the alleged market for Domestic DIPF in the United States in violation of the antitrust laws. The lawsuit claims that, as a result, plaintiffs paid more for Open-Spec DIPF and Domestic DIPF purchased from defendants than they otherwise would have paid. Not set yet For more inforamtion write to: Kit A PPierson Cohen ilstein Sellers & Toll PLLC 1100 New York Avenue, NW Suite 500 West Washington, DC 20005 12-14-2017 16-CV-3402 16-CV-3403 (E.D. Mich.) In re: Auto Parts Antitrust Litigation (Body Sealing Products) Re Defendants: Nishikawa Rubber Co., Ltd. (“NRC”), Nishikawa Cooper LLC (“NISCO”) and Nishikawa of America, Inc. (“NOA”) (collectively, “Nishikawa”) Plaintiffs allege that numerous federal and state law claims based on the alleged price fixing and market allocation of the automotive rubber body sealing products Not set yet For more inforamtion write to: Cotchett, & McCarthy LLP San Francisco Airport Office Center 840 Malcolm Road Suite 200 Burlingame, CA 94010 Robins Kaplan LLP
CAFA-Notice-December-2017.docx