Exam Chair ______________________________________ MBA Faculty Member_______________________________ GAC Rep ________________________________________ Candidate must score an average of 2.5 to pass the oral exam and have no average scores of 1.0 in any category. Scoring example: To score a 4, all items in phrases listed under "4" must be met, otherwise a lower category is scored. 4 3 2 1 Comments --> Exceeds Meets Marginally Meets Does Not Meet Category Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Knowledge of Functional and Integrative Theories, Perspectives, Concepts, and Facts (TPCFs) Can clearly articulate, explain, and evaluate all important TPCFs written or implied in portfolio material and raised during questioning Application of Theories, Perspectives, Concepts, and Facts (TPCFs) Can choose appropriate TPCFs to solve practical problems; can provide illustrative examples and evaluate the outcome and usefulness of the TPCF; can use TPCFs to support arguments; understands multiple viewpoints Quantitative Knows which data to collect; can analyze, and interpret numerical data from a variety of sources and reports and use the information to solve problems or evaluate situations Written Communication Skill Content is well organized; grammar and mechanics are correct. Word selection is sophisticated enough for graduate work. Presentation and Oral Communication Skill Good eye contact; volume and intonation are strong. Meaningful gestures and good rate of delivery. Right quantity of speaking and visuals. Professionalism Follows of presentation etiquette, maintains composure under questioning pressure *Score total requirement (30) is based on assumption that 2 examiners evaluate candidate in all 6 categories (min exam avg = (Adjustments to required score can be made by multiplying the number of categories evaluated by each examiner by 2.5). 2.5). **GAC representative marks "yes" if he/she agrees that the exam was reasonably conducted and evaluated in each category or that adequate reason was used for eliminating evaluation in a particular category (to be done in exceptio Assessment Plan and Report Academic Year 2010-2011
Exam Chair ______________________________________ MBA Faculty Member_______________________________ GAC Rep ________________________________________ Candidate must score an average of 2.5 to pass the oral exam and have no average scores of 1.0 in any category. Scoring example: To score a 4, all items in phrases listed under "4" must be met, otherwise a lower category is scored. Category 4 Exceeds Expectations 3 Meets Expectations 2 Marginally Meets Expectations 1 Does Not Meet Expectations Comments --> Knowledge of Functional and Integrative Theories, Perspectives, Concepts, and Facts (TPCFs) Can clearly articulate, explain, and evaluate all important TPCFs written or implied in portfolio material and raised during questioning Application of Theories, Perspectives, Concepts, and Facts (TPCFs) Can choose appropriate TPCFs to solve practical problems; can provide illustrative examples and evaluate the outcome and usefulness of the TPCF; can use TPCFs to support arguments; understands multiple viewpoints Quantitative Knows which data to collect; can analyze, and interpret numerical data from a variety of sources and reports and use the information to solve problems or evaluate situations Written Communication Skill Content is well organized; grammar and mechanics are correct. Word selection is sophisticated enough for graduate work. Presentation and Oral Communication Skill Good eye contact; volume and intonation are strong. Meaningful gestures and good rate of delivery. Right quantity of speaking and visuals. Professionalism Follows of presentation etiquette, maintains composure under questioning pressure *Score total requirement (30) is based on assumption that 2 examiners evaluate candidate in all 6 categories (min exam avg = 2.5). (Adjustments to required score can be made by multiplying the number of categories evaluated by each examiner by 2.5). **GAC representative marks "yes" if he/she agrees that the exam was reasonably conducted and evaluated in each category or that adequate reason was used for eliminating evaluation in a particular category (to be done in exceptio Assessment Plan and Report Academic Year 2010-2011
CBPA%20Assessment%20Report%20AY%202008-18.docx