project is redefining and strengthening the program assessment components beginning with all program outcomes and creating a systematic process of program outcome assessment. The project begins fall 2017. Section IV Student Engagement and Satisfaction – Administration of Assessment IV-1. The purchase of software in 2015 student surveys of instruction online, SmartEvals allowing for evaluation of every course, every fall and spring semester. The freedom of electronic distribution provides real-time access to quantitative data that reflect the students' evaluation of academic instruction. For academic year 2016-2017, the survey results consisted of rated-scale questions on the following criteria: overall teaching ability, learned in course, instructor effectiveness, timely feedback, and student recommendation. The rated-scale questions used a five-point scale (1-5) with 5 as the highest favorable score. Students who were enrolled in fall and spring courses were given access to the survey through email. IV-2. A duplicated total of 7,496 responded out of a duplicated possible total of 14,787 respondents. Division Aggregated Scores of Student Feedback on Instruction Fall 2016 & Spring 2017 Social Business Communication Math Allied and New Division and and and Health Behavioral Student Technology Fine Arts Science Sciences Orientation Response 52% 51% 53% 54% 48% 47% Rate Overall Teaching 4.5 2.7 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.3 Ability Learned in 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.1 3.8 this Course Instructor 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.1 4 4.1 Effectiveness Timely 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.4 Feedback Recommend to Other 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.3 Students Overall Aggregated Scores for All Divisions
project is redefining and strengthening the program assessment components beginning with all program outcomes and creating a systematic process of program outcome assessment. The project begins fall 2017. Section IV – Student Engagement and Satisfaction Administration of Assessment IV-1. The purchase of SmartEvals software in 2015 student surveys of instruction online, allowing for evaluation of every course, every fall and spring semester. The freedom of electronic distribution provides real-time access to quantitative data that reflect the students' evaluation of academic instruction. For academic year 2016-2017, the survey results consisted of rated-scale questions on the following criteria: overall teaching ability, learned in course, instructor effectiveness, timely feedback, and student recommendation. The rated-scale questions used a five-point scale (1-5) with 5 as the highest favorable score. Students who were enrolled in fall and spring courses were given access to the survey through email. IV-2. A duplicated total of 7,496 responded out of a duplicated possible total of 14,787 respondents. Division Aggregated Scores of Student Feedback on Instruction Fall 2016 & Spring 2017 Division Allied Health Business and Technology Communication and Fine Arts Math and Science Social and Behavioral Sciences New Student Orientation Response Rate 52% 51% 53% 54% 48% 47% Overall Teaching Ability 4.5 2.7 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.3 Learned in this Course 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.1 3.8 Instructor Effectiveness 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.1 4 4.1 Timely Feedback 4.4 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.4 Recommend to Other Students 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.3 Overall Aggregated Scores for All Divisions
CASC-Annual-Student-Assessment-Report-of-2016-2017-Activity-Final.docx