The CPEP State Leadership Team will: Function as a link in the feedback to facilitate Policy Enhanced Practice (PEP) Stay current with any new or impending and Practice Informed Policy (PIP) state policy change and implications with respect to the scalability to align them with The CPEP State Leadership Team does not: the state’s Common Principles of Effective Participate in functions outside the purview Practice and the Key Components of of the state Department of Education Implementation vision/mission Take PEP (Policy Enhanced Practice) PIP – Engage in, intentional or inadvertently, (Policy Informed Practice) issues to “back” efforts to subvert, sabotage, undermine various constituencies/departments to create effective projects and efforts broader understanding and to “forward” Purport to it all or have the answer to other decision-makers for review and everything resolution Act with unilateral authority Move from parallel work to integration – Act as a gatekeeper, compliance monitor or how to build coherence across and among sole expert initiatives (finding points of overlap or Endorse or advocate or mandate various intersection) practices Prioritize the PIP (Practice Informed Policy) issues for resolution and aligning issues – The CPEP State Leadership Team values: and solutions to appropriate levels Be vigilant sustaining Practice-Policy School and district time and efforts feedback loops A harmonious message as evidenced by Work to align multiple initiatives ascribing to the Common Principles of Identify and work to solve adaptive Effective Practice and Key Components of challenges Implementation Support member organizations as they work Active participation and efficient utilization toward the delivery of a common message. of the partnership with the National SISEP Member organizations may include: Center » Department of Education An emphasis on building capacity for » Nonprofits focused on education statewide implementation of effective » The State’s Association of School practices Administrators The perceptions of multiple stakeholders » Educational Cooperative Service Units including parents, district and school staff, » National Association of Elementary community and state level organizations and School Principals members of diverse cultural and disability » The state university systems groups » The State’s Staff Development Council Expertise of those who may provide » The Association for Supervision guidance based on research and experience and Curriculum Development Roles and Responsibilities
Function as a link in the feedback to facilitate Policy Enhanced Practice (PEP) and Practice Informed Policy (PIP) The CPEP State Leadership Team does not: Participate in functions outside the purview of the state Department of Education vision/mission Engage in, intentional or inadvertently, efforts to subvert, sabotage, undermine effective projects and efforts Purport to it all or have the answer to everything Act with unilateral authority Act as a gatekeeper, compliance monitor or sole expert Endorse or advocate or mandate various practices The CPEP State Leadership Team values: School and district time and efforts A harmonious message as evidenced by ascribing to the Common Principles of Effective Practice and Key Components of Implementation Active participation and efficient utilization of the partnership with the National SISEP Center An emphasis on building capacity for statewide implementation of effective practices The perceptions of multiple stakeholders including parents, district and school staff, community and state level organizations and members of diverse cultural and disability groups Expertise of those who may provide guidance based on research and experience Roles and Responsibilities The CPEP State Leadership Team will: Stay current with any new or impending state policy change and implications with respect to the scalability to align them with the state’s Common Principles of Effective Practice and the Key Components of Implementation Take PEP (Policy Enhanced Practice) – PIP (Policy Informed Practice) issues “back” to various constituencies/departments to create broader understanding and “forward” to other decision-makers for review and resolution Move from parallel work to integration – how to build coherence across and among initiatives (finding points of overlap or intersection) Prioritize the PIP (Practice Informed Policy) issues for resolution – and aligning issues and solutions to appropriate levels Be vigilant sustaining Practice-Policy feedback loops Work to align multiple initiatives Identify and work to solve adaptive challenges Support member organizations as they work toward the delivery of a common message. Member organizations may include: » Department of Education » Nonprofits focused on education » The State’s Association of School Administrators » Educational Cooperative Service Units » National Association of Elementary School Principals » The state university systems » The State’s Staff Development Council » The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
coherent-and-aligned-system.docx