Aligning Discussion Point incentives to CoAct supports a stronger 11: Ratio between support weight towards outcome service fees and better fees but believes that new outcome fees outcomes 52 week outcomes, funding What should the to cover expected new NDIS ratio between participants and indexation service fees and of payments should be from outcome fees be new not cost neutral funds. and why? Discussion Point We support a 52 week payment but it should be 12: 4-week and funded from new not 52-week Outcome existing A four week Payments outcome payment is also supported. Recognise costs of Discussion Point transition to 13: Service Fees new system by How tapering should reduction of service service fees fees work over first 2 in the years context Once we have a real of a costs study and funding a fully
Aligning incentives to support better outcomes Discussion Point 11: Ratio between service fees and outcome fees What should the ratio between service fees and outcome fees be and why? CoAct supports a stronger weight towards outcome fees but believes that new 52 week outcomes, funding to cover expected new NDIS participants and indexation of payments should be from new not cost neutral funds. Discussion Point 12: 4-week and 52-week Outcome Payments We support a 52 week payment but it should be funded from new not existing A four week outcome payment is also supported. Discussion Point 13: Service Fees How should service fees work in the context of a funding Recognise costs of transition to new system by tapering reduction of service fees over first 2 years Once we have a real costs study and a fully
CoAct-Final-Response-to-Discussion-Paper.docx