Annexes Annex I APPENDIX I QUALITATIVE CRITERIA FOR JUDGMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF LEVEL 1 WRITTEN EXAMINATION ANSWERS MARK COMMENT KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING COVERAGE STYLE/CLARITY Outstanding Almost faultless for this level: totally relevant, Shows wide knowledge. Excellent presentation and use of answer high factual accuracy and gives appropriate May include evidence of illustrative material. examples. reading beyond the Extremely well written excellent – (80 - 100) lecture materials. structure and coherence. Very good Good relevance, factual accuracy and use of Thorough coverage of Good presentation and use of answer examples. subject illustrative material. Well written – good structure and coherence. (70 79) – Good answer Generally relevant and factually sound but Good coverage of the Satisfactory presentation with contains minor errors and/or some omissions. essential information. appropriate use of illustrative material. Generally, well structured and logical. (60 - 69) Adequate Largely accurate but contains some mistakes Contains the essential Moderate presentation, expression answer and/or key facts or examples are missing. information but little and clarity. Little or inappropriate use of illustrative material. Mostly logical. (50 - 59) Incomplete Sufficient information to indicate the candidate has answer a knowledge and understanding of the subject. Several omissions and/or errors, poor (41 - 49) relevance and/or understanding of concepts.
Annexes Annex I APPENDIX I QUALITATIVE CRITERIA FOR JUDGMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF LEVEL 1 WRITTEN EXAMINATION ANSWERS MARK COMMENT KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING COVERAGE STYLE/CLARITY (80 - 100) Outstanding answer Almost faultless for this level: totally relevant, high factual accuracy and gives appropriate examples. Shows wide knowledge. May include evidence of reading beyond the lecture materials. Excellent presentation and use of illustrative material. Extremely well written – excellent structure and coherence. (70 – 79) Very good answer Good relevance, factual accuracy and use of examples. Thorough coverage of subject Good presentation and use of illustrative material. Well written – good structure and coherence. (60 - 69) Good answer Generally relevant and factually sound but contains minor errors and/or some omissions. Good coverage of the essential information. Satisfactory presentation with appropriate use of illustrative material. Generally, well structured and logical. (50 - 59) Adequate answer Largely accurate but contains some mistakes and/or key facts or examples are missing. Contains the essential information but little Moderate presentation, expression and clarity. Little or inappropriate use of illustrative material. Mostly logical. (41 - 49) Incomplete answer Sufficient information to indicate the candidate has a knowledge and understanding of the subject. Several omissions and/or errors, poor relevance and/or understanding of concepts.
Copa-FSN2014-15.docx