Department/Program of Study: MBA Program Submitted by: Brian Grinder Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 2nd Friday Fall Qtr 2011 Conduct process 2011-12 academic year Submit findings Summer 2012 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Objective Strategy/Method Performance Scoring Levels Expectation Outcome Goal of Measurement Characteristics Standard Graduates are able Student can clearly Each student Students must Scoring will use the At least 70% of to understand and choose and explain enrolled in BADM a median of at least attached rubric. students will score apply the principles appropriate 603 will analyze a 2.5 to pass the oral a median of 3 or of financial theory, financial case that focuses on exam and have no higher on the analysis, reporting techniques used for financial analysis. median score of 1.0 specific objective and markets to the assignment. in any category. A (category). unfamiliar The student fully A written analysis median score of 2.5 circumstances to understands the of the case will be is needed to pass create value. data requirements submitted. Using the specific of each technique the attached rubric, objective being and underlying the written case and assessed (column assumptions. the oral exam of the 2). case will be used to assess the student’s ability to meet the specific objective to be assessed (column 2). Definitions/Instructions: Learning Outcome Goal: One, or part of one, of a program’s adopted learning outcome goals as published in catalog or other program. Objective: Student expected performance, stated in measurable terms, that demonstrates accomplishment of the learning outcome. Strategy/Method of Measurement: Mode and process through which student performance data will be gathered. Examples: embedded test questions in a course or courses, portfolios, in-class activities, standardized test scores, case studies, analysis of written projects, etc. Most measurements benefit from the use of a clearly defined set of criteria (rubric). Performance Characteristics (criteria): Aspects indicative of performance. Pre-defined set of criteria by which data collected will be evaluated: e.g. elements of writing, elements of effective oral presentation, elements of effective management of “x.” Scoring Levels (for Individual Student Performance): Set of defined scoring options used by evaluators to determine level of student achievement. Expectation Standard (collective performance of students): Summary/acceptable measure of collective student performance; e.g. mean student score from rubric; percentage of students meeting defined standard of acceptability. (continued) Assessment Report
Department/Program of Study: MBA Program Submitted by: Brian Grinder Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 2nd Friday Fall Qtr 2011 Conduct process 2011-12 academic year Submit findings Summer 2012 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Outcome Goal Objective Strategy/Method of Measurement Performance Characteristics Scoring Levels Expectation Standard Graduates are able to understand and apply the principles of financial theory, analysis, reporting and markets to unfamiliar circumstances to create value. Student can clearly choose and explain appropriate financial techniques used for the assignment. The student fully understands the data requirements of each technique and underlying assumptions. Each student enrolled in BADM 603 will analyze a case that focuses on financial analysis. A written analysis of the case will be submitted. Using the attached rubric, the written case and the oral exam of the case will be used to assess the student’s ability to meet the specific objective to be assessed (column 2). Students must a median of at least 2.5 to pass the oral exam and have no median score of 1.0 in any category. A median score of 2.5 is needed to pass the specific objective being assessed (column 2). Scoring will use the attached rubric. At least 70% of students will score a median of 3 or higher on the specific objective (category). Definitions/Instructions: Learning Outcome Goal: One, or part of one, of a program’s adopted learning outcome goals as published in catalog or other program. Objective: Student expected performance, stated in measurable terms, that demonstrates accomplishment of the learning outcome. Strategy/Method of Measurement: Mode and process through which student performance data will be gathered. Examples: embedded test questions in a course or courses, portfolios, in-class activities, standardized test scores, case studies, analysis of written projects, etc. Most measurements benefit from the use of a clearly defined set of criteria (rubric). Performance Characteristics (criteria): Aspects indicative of performance. Pre-defined set of criteria by which data collected will be evaluated: e.g. elements of writing, elements of effective oral presentation, elements of effective management of “x.” Scoring Levels (for Individual Student Performance): Set of defined scoring options used by evaluators to determine level of student achievement. Expectation Standard (collective performance of students): Summary/acceptable measure of collective student performance; e.g. mean student score from rubric; percentage of students meeting defined standard of acceptability. (continued) Assessment Report
CBPA%20Assessment%20Report%20AY%202008-18.docx