Subjects with assess acute severe CI (no post-op pain, variations) hence Specific pain limited in assessment for generalizing acute pain only its use in during post-op other period settings Knowledge of patient’s physical status influenced FLACC scores (parents vs. bedside nurse vs. observers) Citation #3 Citation #4 Reference Malviya, S., Solodiuk, et al., The J.C., et al., revised Validation of FLACC the observational Individualized pain tool: Numeric improved Rating Scale reliability and (INRS): a pain validity for assessment pain tool for assessment nonverbal in children children with with intellectual cognitive disability. impairment. Pain, 2010. Paediatr 150(2): p. Anaesth, 231-6. 2006. 16(3): p. 258-65. Use of the Is it feasible Question revised to create a FLACC pain usable assessment
Subjects with severe CI (no variations) Specific pain assessment for acute pain only during post-op period assess acute post-op pain, hence limited in generalizing its use in other settings Knowledge of patient’s physical status influenced FLACC scores (parents vs. bedside nurse vs. observers) Citation #3 Citation #4 Reference Malviya, S., et al., The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment. Paediatr Anaesth, 2006. 16(3): p. 258-65. Solodiuk, J.C., et al., Validation of the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS): a pain assessment tool for nonverbal children with intellectual disability. Pain, 2010. 150(2): p. 231-6. Question Use of the revised FLACC pain assessment Is it feasible to create a usable
CAT-Abstract-Rutatangwa.docx