Pressure Government Problem Duration Sanitation Verification, Sustainability Inclusion of Hygiene/hygienic Facilitators for policies and of the marketing certification, those least conditions numbers, – and scale subsidies process monitoring able capacity Government Don’t have CLTS in Period to Phasing of Continued CLTS slippage Lack of strategy CLTS – fix point Not enough pressure common disaster achieve sanitation monitoring by to the defecation good versus approach on prone ODF is too marketing government poorest facilitators behaviour sanitation, communities long from local change government areas need to support subsidy CLTS versus How CLTS with Latrine Project time to start Post CLTS How to follow up Inclusion Hygiene tools still Attitudes of government subsidy technology frame too on the triggering to sustain ODF marginalised lacking target incentive in flooding short to sanitation monitoring is an still not clear groups (PWD, facilitators achieve and ladder issue elderly) sustain ODF Government Triggering in Very slow Supplies to CLTS quantity No financing Low capacity policy still floating progress remote construction mechanism for of promotes areas towards areas in poor families managers at subsidies for ODF in TML difficult district and toilets some – expensive commune villages in level TML The autonomy Latrine Rate of ODF Competition Pit emptying Very poor area, Lack of of district head design in achievement among services not very long understanding to determine flooding is still low suppliers available – risk of tradition of OD of program area caused going back to OD Not prioritised development priority some to and CLTS stop business Government is Language Availability How to sustain CLTS vs the Lack of less support to barrier to of ODF if the poor strategy to WASH (not work with affordable poorest capacity priority( minority toilets households can’t of locals to ethnic remains an go up the serve as groups issue in Laos sanitation latter facilitators Expensive CLTS the cheapest Some villagers sanitation approach to don’t want to products increase sanitation build a toilet, coverage they say no money, the ask for subsidy
Pressure for and scale Government policies and subsidies Problem Duration of the process Sanitation marketing Verification, certification, monitoring Sustainability Inclusion of those least able Hygiene/hygienic conditions Facilitators – numbers, capacity Government pressure versus behaviour change Don’t have common approach on sanitation, government need to support subsidy CLTS in disaster prone communities Period to achieve ODF is too long Phasing of sanitation marketing Continued monitoring by government CLTS slippage Lack of strategy to the poorest CLTS – fix point defecation Not enough good facilitators from local areas CLTS versus government target How CLTS with subsidy incentive Latrine technology in flooding Project time frame too short to achieve and sustain ODF to start on the sanitation ladder Post CLTS triggering monitoring is an issue How to follow up to sustain ODF still not clear Inclusion marginalised groups (PWD, elderly) Hygiene tools still lacking Attitudes of facilitators Government policy still promotes subsidies for toilets Triggering in floating areas Very slow progress towards ODF in some villages in TML Supplies to remote areas in TML difficult – expensive CLTS quantity construction No financing mechanism for poor families Low capacity of managers at district and commune level The autonomy of district head to determine program priority Latrine design in flooding area Rate of ODF achievement is still low Competition among suppliers caused some to stop business Pit emptying services not available – risk of going back to OD Very poor area, very long tradition of OD Not prioritised Lack of understanding of development and CLTS Government is less support to WASH (not priority( Language barrier to work with minority ethnic groups Availability of affordable toilets remains an issue in Laos How to sustain ODF if the poorest households can’t go up the sanitation latter CLTS vs the poor Lack of strategy to capacity of locals to serve as facilitators Expensive sanitation products CLTS the cheapest approach to increase sanitation coverage Some villagers don’t want to build a toilet, they say no money, the ask for subsidy
CLTS_sharing_learning_Hanoi_14Sept14.docx