Rainbow Business Solutions, d/b/a Precision For more information Tune Auto Care, et al. v. MBF Leasing LLC, et write to: al. Re Defendants: Northern Leasing Systems, Inc., Gutride Safier LLP 100 Pine Street MBF Leasing LLC, Northern Funding LLC, Jay Suite 1250 Cohen, Lenoard Mezei, Sara Krieger, Sam Buono, San Francisco, CA 94111 and SKS Associates, LLC Claim Administrator at Plaintiffs allege that during the period from Northern Leasing Settlement 3-26-2006 to 2010, Leasing Defendants used an c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. inflated cost to assess personal P.O. Box 173043 property taxes on leased equipment. In Milwaukee, WI 53217 particular, Plaintiffs claim that Leasing Defendants did not use the actual “equipment cost” but rather an cost” that “acquisition improperly included commissions paid to sales agents, who induced class members to enter into the leases. Plaintiffs allege violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act; fraud, deceit and/or misrepresentation; negligent misrepresentation; conversion; breach of contract; breach of the duty of good faith; false advertising under California Business and Professions Code sections 17500, and unfair business practices under et seq.; California Business and Professions Code sections 17200, et seq. 8-17-2017 (N.D. Cal.) Ubaldi v. SLM Corporation Not set For more information Re Defendants: Navient Solutions, LLC (“NSL”, yet write to: Navient Corporation, and SLM PC Student Loan Trust 2004-A (“2004-A Trust”) Andrew Friedman Cohen Milstein Sellers Plaintiff alleges that Defendants charged & Toll, PLLC Class Members late fees that were in excess of
Rainbow Business Solutions, d/b/a Precision Tune Auto Care, et al. v. MBF Leasing LLC, et al. Re Defendants: Northern Leasing Systems, Inc., MBF Leasing LLC, Northern Funding LLC, Jay Cohen, Lenoard Mezei, Sara Krieger, Sam Buono, and SKS Associates, LLC Plaintiffs allege that during the period from 3-26-2006 to 2010, Leasing Defendants used an inflated cost to assess personal property taxes on leased equipment. In particular, Plaintiffs claim that Leasing Defendants did not use the actual “equipment cost” but rather an “acquisition cost” that improperly included commissions paid to sales agents, who induced class members to enter into the leases. Plaintiffs allege violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act; fraud, deceit and/or misrepresentation; negligent misrepresentation; conversion; breach of contract; breach of the duty of good faith; false advertising under California Business and Professions Code sections 17500, et seq.; and unfair business practices under California Business and Professions Code sections 17200, et seq. For more information write to: Gutride Safier LLP 100 Pine Street Suite 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Claim Administrator at Northern Leasing Settlement c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. P.O. Box 173043 Milwaukee, WI 53217 8-17-2017 (N.D. Cal.) Ubaldi v. SLM Corporation Re Defendants: Navient Solutions, LLC (“NSL”, Navient Corporation, and SLM PC Student Loan Trust 2004-A (“2004-A Trust”) Plaintiff alleges that Defendants charged Class Members late fees that were in excess of Not set yet For more information write to: Andrew Friedman Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC
CAFA-Notice-August-2017.docx