violent when they grow belongs in the Response and not up. 3Adatto chose the Summary. correctly by not signing for her son to go to the birthday party. I liked Next, the student-writer uses the that Adatto supported chose evaluative phrase “Adatto her position against correctly by not signing for her son paintball for children by to go to the birthday party.” giving the reader an informative story of The wording, effective,” “Especially her own experience shows the student-writer’s taking her son to a evaluation of the effectiveness of paintball birthday. the author’s use of a quote to 4Especially effective provide support for her Thesis was her quote from the Statement. Release of Liability contract, which limits Next, the student-writer evaluates the company’s liability the author’s writing style: also “I in the case of or liked the author’s writing style, “injury death.” Who would want which was informal and written in to expose their child to the voice of a concerned mother.” It this kind of danger? 5I is important that a Response not also liked the author’s only evaluate the effectiveness of writing style, which was the author’s Thesis Statement and informal and written in Support, but also the quality of her the voice of a writing. Notice that the concerned mother. In first states that she the “likes the essay, 6I writing style,” and then gives appreciated that Adatto support for this evaluation: “[the comes to her opinion writing was] informal and written in through her experience the voice of a concerned mother.” portrayed in the narrative rather than by The student-writer signals approval prejudging paintball to for how the author arrived at her be bad from the start. 7I Thesis (“Paintball birthday parties the really enjoyed are bad for kids”) as a way to essay, and through evaluate the effectiveness of the reading it I am as a whole: appreciated that “I determined to protect Adatto comes to her opinion through her experience portrayed in
violent when they grow up. 3Adatto chose correctly by not signing for her son to go to the birthday party. I liked that Adatto supported her position against paintball for children by giving the reader an informative story of her own experience taking her son to a paintball birthday. 4Especially effective was her quote from the Release of Liability contract, which limits the company’s liability in the case of “injury or death.” Who would want to expose their child to this kind of danger? 5I also liked the author’s writing style, which was informal and written in the voice of a concerned mother. In the essay, 6I appreciated that Adatto comes to her opinion through her experience portrayed in the narrative rather than by prejudging paintball to be bad from the start. 7I really enjoyed the essay, and through reading it I am determined to protect belongs in the Response and not the Summary. Next, the student-writer uses the evaluative phrase “Adatto chose correctly by not signing for her son to go to the birthday party.” The wording, “Especially effective,” shows the student-writer’s evaluation of the effectiveness of the author’s use of a quote to provide support for her Thesis Statement. Next, the student-writer evaluates the author’s writing style: “I also liked the author’s writing style, which was informal and written in the voice of a concerned mother.” It is important that a Response not only evaluate the effectiveness of the author’s Thesis Statement and Support, but also the quality of her writing. Notice that the first states that she “likes the writing style,” and then gives support for this evaluation: “[the writing was] informal and written in the voice of a concerned mother.” The student-writer signals approval for how the author arrived at her Thesis (“Paintball birthday parties are bad for kids”) as a way to evaluate the effectiveness of the as a whole: “I appreciated that Adatto comes to her opinion through her experience portrayed in
Ch_7_Sum-Response_Essay_WRITING.docx