Assessment Plan and Report Academic Year 2011-2012 Department/Program of Study: Human Resources Submitted by: Dr. David E. Terpstra Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 2nd Friday Fall Qtr 2011 Conduct process 2011-12 academic year Submit findings 6th Friday Spring 2012 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Objective Strategy/Method Performance Scoring Levels Expectation Outcome Goal of Measurement Characteristics Standard Students should This year’s focus is Multiple choice 1. Knowledge of 5 = Excellent 80% of students possess the on questions regarding the research (90-100) will achieve an knowledge required (PFP) PFP plans will be literature regarding average rating of to effectively plans. developed by HR PFP 4 = Above average 3.0 or higher manage important faculty. (80-89) aspects of the Students will be compensation expected to These questions 3 = Competent function. demonstrate their will be embedded (70-79) knowledge of the in Exam #2 of research literature HUMR 427 2 = Below average regarding PFP (Compensation). (60-69) plans. 1 = Poor (0-59) Definitions/Instructions: Learning Outcome Goal: One, or part of one, of a program’s adopted learning outcome goals as published in catalog or other program. Objective: Student expected performance, stated in measurable terms, that demonstrates accomplishment of the learning outcome. Strategy/Method of Measurement: Mode and process through which student performance data will be gathered. Examples: embedded test questions in a course or courses, portfolios, in-class activities, standardized test scores, case studies, analysis of written projects, etc. Most measurements benefit from the use of a clearly defined set of criteria (rubric). Performance Characteristics (criteria): Aspects indicative of performance. Pre-defined set of criteria by data collected will be evaluated: e.g. elements of writing, elements of effective oral presentation, elements of effective management of “x.” Scoring Levels (for Individual Student Performance): Set of defined scoring options used by evaluators to determine level of student achievement. Expectation Standard (collective performance of students): Summary/acceptable measure of collective student performance; e.g. mean student score from rubric; percentage of students meeting defined standard of acceptability.
Assessment Plan and Report Academic Year 2011-2012 Department/Program of Study: Human Resources Submitted by: Dr. David E. Terpstra Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 2nd Friday Fall Qtr 2011 Conduct process 2011-12 academic year Submit findings 6th Friday Spring 2012 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Outcome Goal Objective Strategy/Method of Measurement Performance Characteristics Scoring Levels Expectation Standard Students should possess the knowledge required to effectively manage important aspects of the compensation function. This year’s focus is on (PFP) plans. Students will be expected to demonstrate their knowledge of the research literature regarding PFP plans. Multiple choice questions regarding PFP plans will be developed by HR faculty. These questions will be embedded in Exam #2 of HUMR 427 (Compensation). 1. Knowledge of the research literature regarding PFP 5 = Excellent (90-100) 4 = Above average (80-89) 3 = Competent (70-79) 2 = Below average (60-69) 1 = Poor (0-59) 80% of students will achieve an average rating of 3.0 or higher Definitions/Instructions: Learning Outcome Goal: One, or part of one, of a program’s adopted learning outcome goals as published in catalog or other program. Objective: Student expected performance, stated in measurable terms, that demonstrates accomplishment of the learning outcome. Strategy/Method of Measurement: Mode and process through which student performance data will be gathered. Examples: embedded test questions in a course or courses, portfolios, in-class activities, standardized test scores, case studies, analysis of written projects, etc. Most measurements benefit from the use of a clearly defined set of criteria (rubric). Performance Characteristics (criteria): Aspects indicative of performance. Pre-defined set of criteria by data collected will be evaluated: e.g. elements of writing, elements of effective oral presentation, elements of effective management of “x.” Scoring Levels (for Individual Student Performance): Set of defined scoring options used by evaluators to determine level of student achievement. Expectation Standard (collective performance of students): Summary/acceptable measure of collective student performance; e.g. mean student score from rubric; percentage of students meeting defined standard of acceptability.
CBPA%20Assessment%20Report%20AY%202008-18.docx