Understanding of the rules applying to plagiarism and collusion; Collate, summarise, reason and argue effectively on a given topic without reference to another’s work or ideas/concepts. Ability to work as an individual, in a small team and in a larger group to effect Meet and succeed in each of the varied assessments presented. data collation, discussion and presentation of evidence; Assessment Type Duration Method Topic Schedule Weighting Assessment E 10 weeks efficacy of individual PDP Attendance and NA 10% participation in PDP Assessment A Nine (9) research project (1,500 Set session 2.2 30% – 2000 words) or Submission session 11.1 studies Assessment B 1 session Listening assessment Listen to a lecture Session 10.2 10% (1 hour) or studies) and answer set questions. Assessment C 1 session Presentation Project presentation Session 11.2 20% Individual and defence presentation Assessment D Two (2) Examination Final summative Week 13 30% Final hour examination covering Examination academic reading and writing skills; history of scholarship and academic debate and critical analysis Total Weighting 100% Standard Progression Criteria For the purposes of PUIC this module carries a standard minimum progression requirement: [grade C* / pass mark 65%]. For University of Plymouth this is a Pass/Fail zero credited module that the student must pass to progress into University Stage 2. Grade Classification Mark A* High Distinction 80% 100% – B* Distinction 70% - 79% C* Pass 65% - 69% F Fail Less than 65% Bibliographic Resources Essential Reading Essential Reading Module Guide see MG ILS1005 – Recommended Reading Cottrell, S., The Study Skills Handbook, 3rd ed., Macmillan, 2008. Fry, R., How to 6th ed., Delmar Learning, 2005. Race, P., How to Get a Good Degree Making the most of your time at university, 2nd ed., Open University Press, 2007. – Further Sources Baker, E., Barrett, M., and Roberts, L., Working communication. Milton, 2002.
Understanding of the rules applying to plagiarism and collusion; Collate, summarise, reason and argue effectively on a given topic without reference to another’s work or ideas/concepts. Ability to work as an individual, in a small team and in a larger group to effect data collation, discussion and presentation of evidence; Meet and succeed in each of the varied assessments presented. Assessment Type Duration Method Topic Schedule Weighting Assessment E 10 weeks efficacy of individual PDP Attendance and participation in PDP NA 10% Assessment A Nine (9) research project (1,500 – 2000 words) or studies Set session 2.2 Submission session 11.1 30% Assessment B 1 session (1 hour) Listening assessment Listen to a lecture or studies) and answer set questions. Session 10.2 10% Assessment C Individual presentation 1 session Presentation Project presentation and defence Session 11.2 20% Assessment D Final Examination Two (2) hour Examination Final summative examination covering academic reading and writing skills; history of scholarship and academic debate and critical analysis Week 13 30% Total Weighting 100% Standard Progression Criteria For the purposes of PUIC this module carries a standard minimum progression requirement: [grade C* / pass mark 65%]. For University of Plymouth this is a Pass/Fail zero credited module that the student must pass to progress into University Stage 2. Grade Classification Mark A* High Distinction 80% – 100% B* Distinction 70% - 79% C* Pass 65% - 69% F Fail Less than 65% Bibliographic Resources Essential Reading Essential Reading Module Guide – see MG ILS1005 Recommended Reading Cottrell, S., The Study Skills Handbook, 3rd ed., Macmillan, 2008. Fry, R., How to 6th ed., Delmar Learning, 2005. Race, P., How to Get a Good Degree – Making the most of your time at university, 2nd ed., Open University Press, 2007. Further Sources Baker, E., Barrett, M., and Roberts, L., Working communication. Milton, 2002.
BSc_Animal_Behaviour_and_Welfare_programme_specification_4174.docx