To assist Member Discussed. Under implementation since early 2009. CDIP/1/3 CDIP/4/2 States to develop and Activities agreed CDIP/2/INF/1 CDIP/6/2 improve national IP upon (CDIP/2/4 This Recommendation was addressed by the following DA CDIP/2/2 CDIP/8/2 institutional capacity and projects: CDIP/4/12 CDIP/9/6 through further CDIP/3/INF/2). CDIP/5/5 CDIP/10/2 development of 1. of National IP Academies”, Phase CDIP3/INF/2 CDIP/10/4 “Establishment ‘Start-Up’ infrastructure and I and II (documents CDIP/3/INF/2 and CDIP/9/10 Rev. 1); CDIP/10/7 facilities with a view to CDIP/10/8 making national IP 2. Smart IP Institutions Project: Deployment of CDIP/12/2 “The institutions more Components and Business Solutions Customized for CDIP/13/3 efficient and promote Modernizing IP Infrastructure of National and Regional IP CDIP/13/4 fair balance between Institutions” (document CDIP/3/INF/2); CDIP/14/2 IP protection and the CDIP/14/4 public interest. This 3. and Technology Transfer Support Structure for CDIP/15/4 “Innovation technical assistance National Institutions” (document CDIP/3/INF/2); CDIP/16/2 should also be CDIP/17/3 extended to 4. of National, SubRegional and Regional IP CDIP/18/2 “Improvement subregional and Institutional and User Capacity” (document in CDIP/3/INF/2); CDIP/19/4 regional organizations CDIP/20/2 dealing with IP. 5. Property and Product Branding for Business “Intellectual Development in Developing Countries and LDCs” (document CDIP/5/5); 6. South-South Cooperation on IP and “Enhancing Development among Developing Countries and LDCs” (document CDIP/7/6); 7. the Capacity of National IP Governmental “Strengthening and Stakeholder Institutions to Manage, Monitor and Promote Creative Industries, and to Enhance the Performance and Network of Copyright Collective Management Organizations” (document CDIP/3/INF/2);
To assist Member States to develop and improve national IP institutional capacity through further development of infrastructure and facilities with a view to making national IP institutions more efficient and promote fair balance between IP protection and the public interest. This technical assistance should also be extended to subregional and regional organizations dealing with IP. Discussed. Activities agreed upon (CDIP/2/4 and CDIP/3/INF/2). Under implementation since early 2009. This Recommendation was addressed by the following DA projects: 1. “Establishment of ‘Start-Up’ National IP Academies”, Phase I and II (documents CDIP/3/INF/2 and CDIP/9/10 Rev. 1); 2. Smart IP Institutions Project: “The Deployment of Components and Business Solutions Customized for Modernizing IP Infrastructure of National and Regional IP Institutions” (document CDIP/3/INF/2); 3. “Innovation and Technology Transfer Support Structure for National Institutions” (document CDIP/3/INF/2); 4. “Improvement of National, SubRegional and Regional IP Institutional and User Capacity” (document in CDIP/3/INF/2); 5. “Intellectual Property and Product Branding for Business Development in Developing Countries and LDCs” (document CDIP/5/5); 6. “Enhancing South-South Cooperation on IP and Development among Developing Countries and LDCs” (document CDIP/7/6); 7. “Strengthening the Capacity of National IP Governmental and Stakeholder Institutions to Manage, Monitor and Promote Creative Industries, and to Enhance the Performance and Network of Copyright Collective Management Organizations” (document CDIP/3/INF/2); CDIP/1/3 CDIP/2/INF/1 CDIP/2/2 CDIP/4/12 CDIP/5/5 CDIP3/INF/2 CDIP/4/2 CDIP/6/2 CDIP/8/2 CDIP/9/6 CDIP/10/2 CDIP/10/4 CDIP/10/7 CDIP/10/8 CDIP/12/2 CDIP/13/3 CDIP/13/4 CDIP/14/2 CDIP/14/4 CDIP/15/4 CDIP/16/2 CDIP/17/3 CDIP/18/2 CDIP/19/4 CDIP/20/2
cdip_21_2.docx