Consultee Comments Response Highways Agency Under Section 6.2 it is recognised that a Phasing Plan should be Accepted - the expectations are now more clearly developed to help guide the approach to delivery of the project. stated. A series of guiding principles are intended to inform this. An additional principle could be incorporated in this section to recognise that any necessary highways infrastructure must be delivered in parallel with new development, such that impacts are mitigated at an appropriate time and that highways — safety and efficiency is not compromised. In relation to infrastructure funding and delivery, it can be and agreed. expected that close co-operation between all stakeholders will inform this, and that appropriate triggers and delivery mechanisms will be a key consideration of all future planning decisions. The role of the Council's Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) Agreed new text has been accordingly. — – including its regular monitoring and review provide a useful point of reference in this section to demonstrate consistency — with the Local Plan, and the links to the Council's overall development strategy. Similarly, reference to the potential collection and use of CIL Agreed new text has been added accordingly. – funding, by the Council would be useful in this section - to provide clarity and consistency in relation to other relevant aspects of the LDF. Proposal GLH of the Proposed Submission Core Strategy (CS) Agreed text amended accordingly. – Hallam Land requires the phased delivery of utilities and highways/transport Management infrastructure. Furthermore, Policy CS.26 requires that infrastructure should be delivered concurrently with, or in advance of, development. The Strategic Phasing section of the Draft SPD also identifies the need for a phasing strategy which integrates development, infrastructure and landscaping, however, it then proposes three phases of development without
Consultee Comments Response Highways Agency Under Section 6.2 it is recognised that a Phasing Plan should be developed to help guide the approach to delivery of the project. A series of guiding principles are intended to inform this. An additional principle could be incorporated in this section to recognise that any necessary highways infrastructure must be delivered in parallel with new development, such that impacts are mitigated at an appropriate time — and that highways safety and efficiency is not compromised. In relation to infrastructure funding and delivery, it can be expected that close co-operation between all stakeholders will inform this, and that appropriate triggers and delivery mechanisms will be a key consideration of all future planning decisions. The role of the Council's Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) — including its regular monitoring and review provide a useful point of reference in this section — to demonstrate consistency with the Local Plan, and the links to the Council's overall development strategy. Similarly, reference to the potential collection and use of CIL funding, by the Council would be useful in this section - to provide clarity and consistency in relation to other relevant aspects of the LDF. Accepted - the expectations are now more clearly stated. and agreed. Agreed – new text has been accordingly. Agreed – new text has been added accordingly. Hallam Land Management Proposal GLH of the Proposed Submission Core Strategy (CS) requires the phased delivery of utilities and highways/transport infrastructure. Furthermore, Policy CS.26 requires that infrastructure should be delivered concurrently with, or in advance of, development. The Strategic Phasing section of the Draft SPD also identifies the need for a phasing strategy which integrates development, infrastructure and landscaping, however, it then proposes three phases of development without Agreed – text amended accordingly.
Consultation%20Statement.docx