trepidation in light of the widespread market New York, NY 10022 turmoil of the past few years. Plaintiffs 212 317-2300 (Ph.) allege that artificially suppressing LIBOR allowed Defendants to pay lower interest rates on LIBOR-based financial instruments that Defendants sold to investors, and otherwise affect the price for LIBOR-based derivatives like Eurodollar futures. 10-20-2017 (C.D. Cal.) Marcus v. OCO Biomedical, Inc. Not set For more information yet or call: Plaintiffs allege that OCO sent unsolicited facsimile advertisements in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. Ackerman & Schmierer LLP § 227. Ross H. Schmierer 103 Eisenhower Parkway Roseland, NJ 07068 973 2286667 (Ph) 10-20-2017 16-CV-01780 (E.D.N.Y.) Zeve Baumgarten, et al. v. CleanWell, LLC 2-9-2018 For more information write, call, fax or Plaintiffs allege that Defendant manufactures, sells, and distributes the Products using a marketing and advertising campaign with claims that its Products are The Sultzer Law P.C. P. Sultzer and/or However, “Natural” “All-Natural”. Joseph Lipari Plaintiffs allege Defendant’s claims are 85 Center Plaza false, deceptive, and misleading because the Suite 104 Products contain artificial and synthetic Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 ingredients. It is further alleged that 845 483-7100 (Ph.) Defendant’s conduct violated and continues to §§ violate New York General Business Law 349 888 749-7747 (Fax) and 350, the consumer protection statutes of all 50 states, and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty
trepidation in light of the widespread market turmoil of the past few years. Plaintiffs allege that artificially suppressing LIBOR allowed Defendants to pay lower interest rates on LIBOR-based financial instruments that Defendants sold to investors, and otherwise affect the price for LIBOR-based derivatives like Eurodollar futures. New York, NY 10022 212 317-2300 (Ph.) 10-20-2017 (C.D. Cal.) Marcus v. OCO Biomedical, Inc. Plaintiffs allege that OCO sent unsolicited facsimile advertisements in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227. Not set yet For more information or call: Ackerman & Schmierer LLP Ross H. Schmierer 103 Eisenhower Parkway Roseland, NJ 07068 973 2286667 (Ph) 10-20-2017 16-CV-01780 (E.D.N.Y.) Zeve Baumgarten, et al. v. CleanWell, LLC Plaintiffs allege that Defendant manufactures, sells, and distributes the Products using a marketing and advertising campaign with claims that its Products are “Natural” and/or “All-Natural”. However, Plaintiffs allege Defendant’s claims are false, deceptive, and misleading because the Products contain artificial and synthetic ingredients. It is further alleged that Defendant’s conduct violated and continues to violate New York General Business Law §§ 349 and 350, the consumer protection statutes of all 50 states, and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty 2-9-2018 For more information write, call, fax or The Sultzer Law P.C. P. Sultzer Joseph Lipari 85 Center Plaza Suite 104 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 845 483-7100 (Ph.) 888 749-7747 (Fax)
CAFA-Notice-October-2017.docx