constitute an exception and shall be justified under Article 31 of Directive 2004/18/EC or The deadlines to request Article 40 of Directive 2014/17/EC by the party seeking to rely on their use) or the participation, submit tenders, or amendments are compliant with Article 72 of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 89 of ask for information were Directive 2014/25/EU if the national transposing these Directives was applicable to the compliant with the contract in question; requirements of the applicable amendments do not introduce changes which are materially different in character from the national law transposing the EU conditions of the original contract showing the intention to renegotiate essential terms of Directives on public the contract; procurement. amendments do not introduce conditions which, had they been part of the initial award procedure, would have allowed for the admission of tenderers other than those initially The procurement procedures admitted or would have allowed for the acceptance of a tender other than the one initially applied were transparent and accepted; non-discriminatory. the scope of the contract has not been extended considerably to encompass services not covered initially; The selection and award criteria the economic balance of the contract has not changed in favour of the supplier in a manner were published in the contract which was not provided for in the terms of the initial procurement documents. notice / tender specifications. No changes to the exclusion / Where the national law transposing Directives 2014/24/EU or 2014/25/EU is applicable and a new contractor replaces the one to which the contract was initially awarded the selection / award criteria were amendment is in line with Article 72(1)(d) of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 89(1)(d) of made after the submission of Directive 2014/25/EU: there is either (1) an unequivocal review clause or option or , (2) a tenders. universal or partial succession of the initial contractor and the new contractor fulfils the The evaluation was on criteria. The award decision was consistent with the results obtained and the contract was awarded to the best ranked tender.
constitute an exception and shall be justified under Article 31 of Directive 2004/18/EC or Article 40 of Directive 2014/17/EC by the party seeking to rely on their use) or the amendments are compliant with Article 72 of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 89 of Directive 2014/25/EU if the national transposing these Directives was applicable to the contract in question; amendments do not introduce changes which are materially different in character from the conditions of the original contract showing the intention to renegotiate essential terms of the contract; amendments do not introduce conditions which, had they been part of the initial award procedure, would have allowed for the admission of tenderers other than those initially admitted or would have allowed for the acceptance of a tender other than the one initially accepted; the scope of the contract has not been extended considerably to encompass services not covered initially; the economic balance of the contract has not changed in favour of the supplier in a manner which was not provided for in the terms of the initial procurement documents. Where the national law transposing Directives 2014/24/EU or 2014/25/EU is applicable and a new contractor replaces the one to which the contract was initially awarded the amendment is in line with Article 72(1)(d) of Directive 2014/24/EU or Article 89(1)(d) of Directive 2014/25/EU: there is either (1) an unequivocal review clause or option or , (2) a universal or partial succession of the initial contractor and the new contractor fulfils the The deadlines to request participation, submit tenders, or ask for information were compliant with the requirements of the applicable national law transposing the EU Directives on public procurement. The procurement procedures applied were transparent and non-discriminatory. The selection and award criteria were published in the contract notice / tender specifications. No changes to the exclusion / selection / award criteria were made after the submission of tenders. The evaluation was on criteria. The award decision was consistent with the results obtained and the contract was awarded to the best ranked tender.
cef_mga_annex_vii_revision_nov_2017_approved_clean.docx