impact on good for me or the baby and could make us both unwell. I protected would have no support when I needed it.” groups and Mental health (and differentiation of the needs of those living service users) with significant mental health – “People in rural problems do not all meet the FACS criteria which is set at a areas high threshold. People are being maintained independently using SP Funding. This keeps them from relapsing and requiring even more expensive services. This funding stream was originally established for this purpose and the evidence suggests it has been most effective used for those who have experienced mental illness.” is punishing already vulnerable and old people.” Age – “This / Being elderly I feel as if you are all taking away everything I value in life. If this isn't discrimination, I don't know what is. Please don't do this to us.” / people have been hit “Young hard by all of the cuts in the last 5 years. As a professional I have seen the negative effect this has had.” / - people who need help to set up for Disability “Young themselves or people who are already at a disadvantage due to disability need as much help as we can give them.” / will people who are dyslexic and have special needs “How get support to even get started with a house. Where will people get help?” / seems very wrong to make cutbacks “It on the elderly and disabled as we are the people who really need supporting people services.” Low income seems the lower paid and over sixties get – “It the same problem every time a cut back on most things.” General - that are in the situation requires “People these services did not willingly put themselves in it. Taking this service away would discriminate anyone that is not healthy or happy at home and stop them being able to live as normally as possible. They are not being given the same chance at life as everyone else.”
impact on protected groups and those living in rural areas good for me or the baby and could make us both unwell. I would have no support when I needed it.” Mental health (and differentiation of the needs of service users) – “People with significant mental health problems do not all meet the FACS criteria which is set at a high threshold. People are being maintained independently using SP Funding. This keeps them from relapsing and requiring even more expensive services. This funding stream was originally established for this purpose and the evidence suggests it has been most effective used for those who have experienced mental illness.” Age – “This is punishing already vulnerable and old people.” / Being elderly I feel as if you are all taking away everything I value in life. If this isn't discrimination, I don't know what is. Please don't do this to us.” / “Young people have been hit hard by all of the cuts in the last 5 years. As a professional I have seen the negative effect this has had.” / Disability - “Young people who need help to set up for themselves or people who are already at a disadvantage due to disability need as much help as we can give them.” / “How will people who are dyslexic and have special needs get support to even get started with a house. Where will people get help?” / “It seems very wrong to make cutbacks on the elderly and disabled as we are the people who really need supporting people services.” Low income – “It seems the lower paid and over sixties get the same problem every time a cut back on most things.” General - “People that are in the situation requires these services did not willingly put themselves in it. Taking this service away would discriminate anyone that is not healthy or happy at home and stop them being able to live as normally as possible. They are not being given the same chance at life as everyone else.”
Building%20resilient%20lives%20%20LARGE%20PRINT%20WORD%20version.docx