Assessment Plan and Report Academic Year 2009-2010 Department/Program of Study: _____Undergraduate Business Core________ Submitted by: _________Damon Aiken_______________________ Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 4th Friday Spring Qtr 2009 Conduct process 2009-2010 academic year Submit findings 4th Friday Fall 2010 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Objective Strategy/Method of Performance Scoring Levels Expectation Outcome Goal Measurement Characteristics Standard Students will Use a presentation Ratings appear in 5 or 10 Excellent Students’ mean – possess rubric devised by Dr. six categories: 4 or 8 Good score will be above – presentation Aiken, Dr. Weigand, and 1. Verbal and 3 or 6 Proficient 35 (in total) and – skills that are the UBPC. Use rubric in 2 or 4 Needs above the – sufficient for a convenience sample Communications (5pt Improvement level in “proficient” the variety of across a variety of scale) 1 or 2 Poor each rubric – classes they will business classes (and at 2. Organization & category. encounter in the least two quarters). The Structure (5pt (rubric attached) business core. rubric was administered 3. Analyses (10 pt) to 23 student-groups in 4. Discussion & four classes (MKT 481, Conclusions (10 pt) OPSM 441, MGMT 471, 5. Recommendations and MGMT 423). (10 pt scale) 6. Overall Quality & Effectiveness (10 pt) Assessment Report 7 8 9 10 11 Observations Conclusions about Student Learning Actions Recommended Plan and Timetable Overall from Summary Based on Observations for Taking Action Reflection on Data Assessment Mean scores (by Means in each of the categories were Our observations: category, #4 That students above the proficient level. The lowest above): likely don’t scores were on and “Organization spend the Structure” and the development of 4.05 time sound/strategic “Recommendations.” 3.80 evaluating 7.89 their 7.95 presentation’s 7.50 structure and 8.09 that they don’t
Assessment Plan and Report Academic Year 2009-2010 Department/Program of Study: _____Undergraduate Business Core________ Submitted by: _________Damon Aiken_______________________ Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 4th Friday Spring Qtr 2009 Conduct process 2009-2010 academic year Submit findings 4th Friday Fall 2010 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Outcome Goal Objective Strategy/Method of Measurement Performance Characteristics Scoring Levels Expectation Standard Students will possess presentation skills that are sufficient for the variety of classes they will encounter in the business core. Use a presentation rubric devised by Dr. Aiken, Dr. Weigand, and the UBPC. Use rubric in a convenience sample across a variety of business classes (and at least two quarters). The rubric was administered to 23 student-groups in four classes (MKT 481, OPSM 441, MGMT 471, and MGMT 423). Ratings appear in six categories: 1. Verbal and Communications (5pt scale) 2. Organization & Structure (5pt 3. Analyses (10 pt) 4. Discussion & Conclusions (10 pt) 5. Recommendations (10 pt scale) 6. Overall Quality & Effectiveness (10 pt) 5 or 10 – Excellent 4 or 8 – Good 3 or 6 – Proficient 2 or 4 – Needs Improvement 1 or 2 – Poor (rubric attached) Students’ mean score will be above 35 (in total) and above the “proficient” level in each rubric category. Assessment Report 7 8 9 10 11 Observations from Summary Data Conclusions about Student Learning Actions Recommended Based on Observations Plan and Timetable for Taking Action Overall Reflection on Assessment Mean scores (by category, #4 above): 4.05 3.80 7.89 7.95 7.50 8.09 Means in each of the categories were above the proficient level. The lowest scores were on “Organization and Structure” and the development of sound/strategic “Recommendations.” Our observations: That students likely don’t spend the time evaluating their presentation’s structure and that they don’t
CBPA%20Assessment%20Report%20AY%202008-18.docx