Strategy 1 Angie Arnold October 2012 Compass Those students will take the Group the students that are within 3 points of Patrick O’Driscoll to Nov 2012 Review Compass test Nov 2, 2012 and making state benchmark in math and put them in a program should score at or above state transition course during RTI time for 8 sessions benchmark. (*Response to Intervention time is 40 minutes ) Strategy 2 Strategy 3 Short-Term Improvement Goal #2 (timeframe of one year or less): Move 25% of those juniors that did not meet benchmark on the PLAN test as measured by the ACT by March 2013. Strategy Persons Timeframe Resources & Anticipated Impact (What the Responsible or Budget program should look like when Involved strategy is implemented, what data and documentation will be collected to verify progress, completion implementation, and success Strategy 1 Math department Jan 2013 to ACT practice When ACT data is released students that are close to benchmark in math Guidance March 2013 program from from the March 2013 test, we on the PLAN test and place them in review sessions Department Triumph expect to have 25% more during RTI time for 8 sessions. students meet or exceed benchmark in math. Strategy 2 Math department August 2012 to Math Plus Classrooms should not be Math instruction will include increased student Principal March 2013 Grant based solely around lecture. centered activities. Walkthroughs meetings Evidence of increased students working in groups. Lesson Plans & observations will reflect more hands on activities. Strategy 3 Math department August 2012 to Math Plus Lesson plans and observations Varied formative assessments should drive Walkthroughs March 2013 Grant will document the use of instruction and student learning meetings formative assessment to drive instruction.
Strategy 1 Group the students that are within 3 points of making state benchmark in math and put them in a transition course during RTI time for 8 sessions (*Response to Intervention time is 40 minutes ) Angie Arnold Patrick O’Driscoll October 2012 to Nov 2012 Compass Review program Those students will take the Compass test Nov 2, 2012 and should score at or above state benchmark. Strategy 2 Strategy 3 Short-Term Improvement Goal #2 (timeframe of one year or less): Move 25% of those juniors that did not meet benchmark on the PLAN test as measured by the ACT by March 2013. Strategy Persons Responsible or Involved Timeframe Resources & Budget Anticipated Impact (What the program should look like when strategy is implemented, what data and documentation will be collected to verify progress, completion implementation, and success Strategy 1 students that are close to benchmark in math on the PLAN test and place them in review sessions during RTI time for 8 sessions. Math department Guidance Department Jan 2013 to March 2013 ACT practice program from Triumph When ACT data is released from the March 2013 test, we expect to have 25% more students meet or exceed benchmark in math. Strategy 2 Math instruction will include increased student centered activities. Math department Principal Walkthroughs August 2012 to March 2013 Math Plus Grant meetings Classrooms should not be based solely around lecture. Evidence of increased students working in groups. Lesson Plans & observations will reflect more hands on activities. Strategy 3 Varied formative assessments should drive instruction and student learning Math department Walkthroughs August 2012 to March 2013 Math Plus Grant meetings Lesson plans and observations will document the use of formative assessment to drive instruction.
Butler%20County%20MathPLUS%20Improvement%20Plan%202010-13.docx