understanding of most of presentation subject is most points with verbal delivery two or three of the extract, tape recording, the basic concepts/ areas concerned. Occasionally examples from and/or volume may following:- OHP, powerpoint, 50 59 – with which the description or explanation may reading and, be inappropriate. slides etc. Other eye contact, reference to presentation subject is not be clear or thorough enough, occasionally, media may have been shared experiences, concerned. Occasionally or there may not be appropriate experience more appropriate for written and visual include some minor or sufficient attempts to compare the presentation ability to materials, attention to irrelevancies. and contrast. Arguments are not subject matter summarise though differences in learning all systematically or coherently may be rather styles developed. dependent on language of source material Some failure to focus on Usually adequately describes Shows evidence of Poor use of Limited audience Limited choice and the topic at times. Shows and explains basic concepts/ limited reading, but engagement. Almost total inappropriate use of i.e. Lacks clarity. some understanding of the areas with which the sources used may reliance on one of the supporting materials topic. May have omitted presentation subject is be limited, or basic, range of devices which and e.g. Video 41 - 49 Pace and volume of some basic concepts/ concerned, though explanations or some major might have been included extract, tape recording, verbal delivery are areas or included are not always clear. Some sources which are e.g. eye contact, OHP, powerpoint, unsuitable for the attempts to compare and central to the reference to shared slides etc. environment. unimportant areas. Is not contrast ideas or information but subject may have experiences, written and always relevant largely descriptive. been omitted. visual materials, attention to differences in learning Supports some styles. Presentation points in the almost entirely read from presentation with a script. examples from reading/experience but these may be badly chosen. Very limited ability to summarise Pass Sufficient work to reach minimum acceptable (40) standard Has not addressed the little understanding of basic The presenter Extremely poor use absence of devices Total absence of subject matter of the concepts, and attempts to shows minimal of voice. which might have been supporting materials Fail presentation in any describe them are unclear or evidence of included to engage the and media e.g. Video erroneous. background audience. extract, tape recording,
50 – 59 understanding of most of the basic concepts/ areas with which the presentation subject is concerned. Occasionally include some minor irrelevancies. presentation subject is concerned. Occasionally description or explanation may not be clear or thorough enough, or there may not be appropriate or sufficient attempts to compare and contrast. Arguments are not all systematically or coherently developed. most points with examples from reading and, occasionally, experience ability to summarise though may be rather dependent on language of source material verbal delivery and/or volume may be inappropriate. two or three of the following:- eye contact, reference to shared experiences, written and visual materials, attention to differences in learning styles extract, tape recording, OHP, powerpoint, slides etc. Other media may have been more appropriate for the presentation subject matter 41 - 49 Some failure to focus on the topic at times. Shows some understanding of the topic. May have omitted some basic concepts/ areas or included unimportant areas. Is not always relevant Usually adequately describes and explains basic concepts/ areas with which the presentation subject is concerned, though explanations are not always clear. Some attempts to compare and contrast ideas or information but largely descriptive. Shows evidence of limited reading, but sources used may be limited, or basic, or some major sources which are central to the subject may have been omitted. Supports some points in the presentation with examples from reading/experience but these may be badly chosen. Very limited ability to summarise Poor use of i.e. Lacks clarity. Pace and volume of verbal delivery are unsuitable for the environment. Limited audience engagement. Almost total reliance on one of the range of devices which might have been included e.g. eye contact, reference to shared experiences, written and visual materials, attention to differences in learning styles. Presentation almost entirely read from a script. Limited choice and inappropriate use of supporting materials and e.g. Video extract, tape recording, OHP, powerpoint, slides etc. Pass (40) Sufficient work to reach minimum acceptable standard Fail Has not addressed the subject matter of the presentation in any little understanding of basic concepts, and attempts to describe them are unclear or erroneous. The presenter shows minimal evidence of background Extremely poor use of voice. absence of devices which might have been included to engage the audience. Total absence of supporting materials and media e.g. Video extract, tape recording,
Copa-FSN2014-15.docx