Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 2nd Friday Fall Qtr 2010 Conduct process 2010-11 academic year Submit findings 6th Friday Spring 2011 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Objective Strategy/Method Performance Scoring Levels Expectation Outcome Goal of Measurement Characteristics Standard Analyze and To articulate, Students analyze See attached rubric. 1=does not meet Ninety percent of explain, and and present a case expectations students should formulate evaluate functional on a company to a an average of solutions to and integrative panel of three 2=marginally meets 2.5 or better for the problems theories, evaluators. Each expectations first two categories related to the perspectives, evaluator scores on the rubric, and environment in concepts, and facts, the student’s expectations 95% should score then to use those performance. The 2.5 or better when which theories, third evaluator, 4=exceeds averaging all organizations perspectives, who is the graduate expectations categories. (Note: exist and concepts, and facts school the quantitative function to solve practical representative has category was not including problems, support the option of scored) arguments, and scoring or checking information evaluate multiple a box to indicate technology, viewpoints in the that the exam was legal, ethical, context of company conducted fairly. economic, strategy, In this dataset, one social, political governance, and of the graduate structure. school and global representatives aspects. scored and the other checked an indicator box. Scoring was averaged for all numerical values. A copy of the rubric used is attached, along with the explanation associated with each rating value. Definitions/Instructions: Learning Outcome Goal: One, or part of one, of a program’s adopted learning outcome as published in catalog or other program. Objective: Student expected performance, stated in measurable terms, that demonstrates accomplishment of the learning outcome.
Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 2nd Friday Fall Qtr 2010 Conduct process 2010-11 academic year Submit findings 6th Friday Spring 2011 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Outcome Goal Objective Strategy/Method of Measurement Performance Characteristics Scoring Levels Expectation Standard Analyze and formulate solutions to problems related to the environment in which organizations exist and function including information technology, legal, ethical, economic, social, political and global aspects. To articulate, explain, and evaluate functional and integrative theories, perspectives, concepts, and facts, then to use those theories, perspectives, concepts, and facts to solve practical problems, support arguments, and evaluate multiple viewpoints in the context of company strategy, governance, and structure. Students analyze and present a case on a company to a panel of three evaluators. Each evaluator scores the student’s performance. The third evaluator, who is the graduate school representative has the option of scoring or checking a box to indicate that the exam was conducted fairly. In this dataset, one of the graduate school representatives scored and the other checked an indicator box. Scoring was averaged for all numerical values. A copy of the rubric used is attached, along with the explanation associated with each rating value. See attached rubric. 1=does not meet expectations 2=marginally meets expectations expectations 4=exceeds expectations Ninety percent of students should an average of 2.5 or better for the first two categories on the rubric, and 95% should score 2.5 or better when averaging all categories. (Note: the quantitative category was not scored) Definitions/Instructions: Learning Outcome Goal: One, or part of one, of a program’s adopted learning outcome as published in catalog or other program. Objective: Student expected performance, stated in measurable terms, that demonstrates accomplishment of the learning outcome.
CBPA%20Assessment%20Report%20AY%202008-18.docx