Table 31 Indicators of Disadvantage, Yuille Park 94 – 32 Change on Selected Markers, Yuille Park 95 – Table 33 Potential Economic Benefits, Yuille Park 97 – Table 34 Economic Benefits, Yuille Park 100 – 35 Integration and Co-Location Findings, Sherbrooke 101 – Table 36 Indicators of Disadvantage, Sherbrooke 104 – Table 37 Change on Selected Markers, Sherbrooke 105 – Table 38 Potential Economic Benefits, Sherbrooke 107 – 39 Economic Benefits, Sherbrooke 109 – Table 40 Integration and Co-Location Findings, Moe Place 110 – 41 Indicators of Disadvantage, Moe Place 113 – Table 42 Change on Selected Markers, Moe Place 113 – Table 43 Potential Economic Benefits, Moe 116 – Table 44 Economic Benefits, Moe 118 – Table 45 Integration and Co-Location Findings, Frankston North 120 – Table 46 Indicators of Disadvantage, Frankston North 123 – Table 47 Change On Selected Markers, Frankston North 124 – Table 48 Potential Economic Benefits and ROI, Frankston North Ess 126 – Table 49 Economic Benefits, Frankston North Extended Hub 127 – 50 Integration and Co-Location Findings, Broadmeadows 129 – Table 51 Services in the Broadmeadows Schools Regeneration Project 131 – Table 52 Indicators of Disadvantage, Broadmeadows 132 – 53 Change on Selected Markers, Broadmeadows46 133 – Table 54 Potential Economic Benefits and ROI, Hume Central 136 – Table 55 Economic Benefits Hume Central 137 – – Table 56 Integration and Co-Location Findings, Tarneit 138 – Table 57 Indicators of Disadvantage, Tarneit 141 – Table 58 Change on Selected Markers, Tarneit 141 – Table 59 Integration and Co-Location Findings, Deer Park 143 – Table 60 Indicators of Disadvantage, Deer Park 146 – Table 61 Change on Selected Markers, Deer Park 147 – Table 62 Integration and Co-Location Findings, Whittington 150 – Table 63 Indicators of Disadvantage, Whittington 152 – 64 Change on Selected Markers, Whittington 154 –
Table 31 – Indicators of Disadvantage, Yuille Park 94 32 – Change on Selected Markers, Yuille Park 95 Table 33 – Potential Economic Benefits, Yuille Park 97 Table 34 – Economic Benefits, Yuille Park 100 35 – Integration and Co-Location Findings, Sherbrooke 101 Table 36 – Indicators of Disadvantage, Sherbrooke 104 Table 37 – Change on Selected Markers, Sherbrooke 105 Table 38 – Potential Economic Benefits, Sherbrooke 107 39 – Economic Benefits, Sherbrooke 109 Table 40 – Integration and Co-Location Findings, Moe Place 110 41 – Indicators of Disadvantage, Moe Place 113 Table 42 – Change on Selected Markers, Moe Place 113 Table 43 – Potential Economic Benefits, Moe 116 Table 44 – Economic Benefits, Moe 118 Table 45 – Integration and Co-Location Findings, Frankston North 120 Table 46 – Indicators of Disadvantage, Frankston North 123 Table 47 – Change On Selected Markers, Frankston North 124 Table 48 – Potential Economic Benefits and ROI, Frankston North Ess 126 Table 49 – Economic Benefits, Frankston North Extended Hub 127 50 – Integration and Co-Location Findings, Broadmeadows 129 Table 51 – Services in the Broadmeadows Schools Regeneration Project 131 Table 52 – Indicators of Disadvantage, Broadmeadows 132 53 – Change on Selected Markers, Broadmeadows46 133 Table 54 – Potential Economic Benefits and ROI, Hume Central 136 Table 55 – Economic Benefits – Hume Central 137 Table 56 – Integration and Co-Location Findings, Tarneit 138 Table 57 – Indicators of Disadvantage, Tarneit 141 Table 58 – Change on Selected Markers, Tarneit 141 Table 59 – Integration and Co-Location Findings, Deer Park 143 Table 60 – Indicators of Disadvantage, Deer Park 146 Table 61 – Change on Selected Markers, Deer Park 147 Table 62 – Integration and Co-Location Findings, Whittington 150 Table 63 – Indicators of Disadvantage, Whittington 152 64 – Change on Selected Markers, Whittington 154
Co-location%20and%20Integration%20Initiatives%20Strategic%20Evaluation.docx