The reviewers will evaluate and score the Phase 2 proposals using the criteria detailed in Table 2. The qualitative comments and scoring will guide and inform Phase 2 panel review members in making recommendations to the NRF for approval of the nominated candidate and proposed research programme: Table 2.Scorecard for postal peer review of CoE Phase 2 proposals 1 2 3 4 5 DESCRIPTOR Internationally Internationally Leading Nationally Uncompetitive leading competitive, and nationally, not yet competitive leading nationally internationally competitive REVIEW CATEGORY Track record of The candidate is The candidate is The candidate has The candidate has The candidate has nominated outstanding and excellent and has a a record that is a record that is a track record that candidate: has a track record track record that is at the forefront satisfactory but is is unsatisfactory in Research outputs that is world leading internationally nationally and is not at the leading terms of the quality Impact of research in terms of the competitive in becoming edge in terms of and impact of quality and impact terms of the quality internationally the quality and research outputs National and of research outputs and impact of competitive in impact of research and, training and international standing and, training and research outputs terms of the quality outputs and, mentoring of Masters and doctoral mentoring of and, training and and impact of training and postgraduate postgraduate training
The reviewers will evaluate and score the Phase 2 proposals using the criteria detailed in Table 2. The qualitative comments and scoring will guide and inform Phase 2 panel review members in making recommendations to the NRF for approval of the nominated candidate and proposed research programme: Table 2.Scorecard for postal peer review of CoE Phase 2 proposals 1 2 3 4 5 DESCRIPTOR Internationally leading Internationally competitive, and leading nationally Leading nationally, not yet internationally competitive Nationally competitive Uncompetitive REVIEW CATEGORY Track record of nominated candidate: Research outputs Impact of research National and international standing Masters and doctoral postgraduate training The candidate is outstanding and has a track record that is world leading in terms of the quality and impact of research outputs and, training and mentoring of The candidate is excellent and has a track record that is internationally competitive in terms of the quality and impact of research outputs and, training and The candidate has a record that is at the forefront nationally and is becoming internationally competitive in terms of the quality and impact of The candidate has a record that is satisfactory but is not at the leading edge in terms of the quality and impact of research outputs and, training and The candidate has a track record that is unsatisfactory in terms of the quality and impact of research outputs and, training and mentoring of postgraduate
CoE%20Review%20Framework%20%202013.docx