Cox, G. W., & Katz, J. N. (2002). Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. the Reapportionment Revolution. L. (2011). a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American “Toward 100–114. Political Science Review, 105(1), K. (2010). Impact of Gender Stereotypes Evaluations on Support for Women “The Candidates.” 32(1), 69-88. Political Behavior, Druckman, J. N. (2014). of Studying Public Opinion, Political Communication, and “Pathologies Democratic Responsiveness.” 467–92. Political Communication, 31(3), Druckman, J. N., Hennessy, C. L., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2010). Engagement on “Issue Congressional Candidate Web Sites, 2002—2006.” 28 Social Science Computer Review (1), 3–23. Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2009). Communications in U.S. “Campaign Congressional Elections.” 343–66. American Political Science Review, 103(3), Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J. & Parkin, M. (2010). "Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium: Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Websites, 2002-2006." Political 88-103. Communication, 27(1), Druckman, J. N., M. J. & Parkin, M. (2017). the Opportunity for Change: How “Resisting Congressional Campaign Insiders Viewed and Used the Web in 2016.” Social Science 392-405. Computer Review, 36(4), Druckman, J. N., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). "Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects." American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 875-896.
Cox, G. W., & Katz, J. N. (2002). Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. L. (2011). “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review, 105(1), 100–114. K. (2010). “The Impact of Gender Stereotypes Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior, 32(1), 69-88. Druckman, J. N. (2014). “Pathologies of Studying Public Opinion, Political Communication, and Democratic Responsiveness.” Political Communication, 31(3), 467–92. Druckman, J. N., Hennessy, C. L., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2010). “Issue Engagement on Congressional Candidate Web Sites, 2002—2006.” Social Science Computer Review 28 (1), 3–23. Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2009). “Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review, 103(3), 343–66. Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J. & Parkin, M. (2010). "Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium: Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Websites, 2002-2006." Political Communication, 27(1), 88-103. Druckman, J. N., M. J. & Parkin, M. (2017). “Resisting the Opportunity for Change: How Congressional Campaign Insiders Viewed and Used the Web in 2016.” Social Science Computer Review, 36(4), 392-405. Druckman, J. N., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). "Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects." American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 875-896.
Campaign%20Rhetoric%20and%20the%20Incumbency%20Advantage%20Nov%2028%202018.docx