population of the school not be (n=1,179=32.6% was not sensitive to analyses on significant, nor school-level 1,116=94.7% of was written SES sample of reference to smokers) smoking control policy or educational activities about smoking prevention. A lower probability of smoking on school premises was found for state subsidized private schools (odds ratio [OR]: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.11–0.35) and nonsubsidized private schools (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.14–0.62) when compared with that for public schools
population (n=1,179=32.6% analyses on 1,116=94.7% of sample of smokers) of the school was not significant, nor was written reference to smoking control policy or educational activities about smoking prevention. A lower probability of smoking on school premises was found for state subsidized private schools (odds ratio [OR]: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.11–0.35) and nonsubsidized private schools (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.14–0.62) when compared with that for public schools not be sensitive to school-level SES
Youth-report-Web.docx