the provider’s control) triggering levy levels? 17 Do you agree with the Board seeks views before considering the recommendation every issue further organisation which is covered by the Scheme should make a contribution to its running costs? 18 Do you agree with the Board seeks views before considering the recommendation there should be issue further no cross-subsidisation of providers, nor sweetheart deals. Thus, the levy arrangements for Transpower and First Gas should be revisited? 19 Do you agree with the seeks views before considering the recommendation The fixed issue further element should cover all costs incurred by Utilities Disputes excluding those solely related to the handling of individual complaints? 20 Do you agree with the Board seeks views before considering the recommendation In keeping with issue further the pays’ principle, any case ‘user reaching Utilities Disputes at deadlock should incur a fee? 21 Do you agree with the Board seeks views before considering the
the provider’s control) triggering levy levels? 17 Do you agree with the recommendation every organisation which is covered by the Scheme should make a contribution to its running costs? Board seeks views before considering the issue further 18 Do you agree with the recommendation there should be no cross-subsidisation of providers, nor sweetheart deals. Thus, the levy arrangements for Transpower and First Gas should be revisited? Board seeks views before considering the issue further 19 Do you agree with the recommendation The fixed element should cover all costs incurred by Utilities Disputes excluding those solely related to the handling of individual complaints? seeks views before considering the issue further 20 Do you agree with the recommendation In keeping with the ‘user pays’ principle, any case reaching Utilities Disputes at deadlock should incur a fee? Board seeks views before considering the issue further 21 Do you agree with the Board seeks views before considering the
2018_Consultation_Document.docx