Manual Mechanical Locked Grand % of Cumulative Hold Restraint Seclusion Total Total % 160 64.00% 64.00% MR2951 90 70 17 16 33 13.20% 77.20% MR7878 8 2 10 4.00% 81.20% MR7950 8 8 3.20% 84.40% MR684 3 3 6 2.40% 86.80% MR7419 5 5 2.00% 88.80% MR4974 2 2 4 1.60% 90.40% MR2576 3 3 1.20% 91.60% MR4814 2 1 3 1.20% 92.80% MR7127 2 1 3 1.20% 94.00% MR7932 1 1 2 0.80% 94.80% MR91 1 1 2 0.80% 95.60% MR484 2 2 0.80% 96.40% MR8023 1 1 0.40% 96.80% MR6466 1 1 0.40% 97.20% MR7032 1 1 0.40% 97.60% MR7326 1 1 0.40% 98.00% MR7468 1 1 0.40% 98.40% MR7509 1 1 0.40% 98.80% MR7820 1 1 0.40% 99.20% MR7892 1 1 0.40% 99.60% MR8016 1 1 0.40% 100.00% MR8022 100.00% 153 0 97 250 27% (22/81) of the average hospital population experienced some form of confinement event during 3Q2017. Five of these patients (6% of the average hospital population) accounted for 87% of the confinement events. V28) Riverview demonstrates that, on a review of two quarters of data, for 95% of seclusion events, seclusion was employed only when absolutely necessary to protect the patient from causing physical harm to self or others or for the management of violent behavior;
Manual Hold Mechanical Restraint Locked Seclusion Grand Total % of Total Cumulative % MR2951 90 70 160 64.00% 64.00% MR7878 17 16 33 13.20% 77.20% MR7950 8 2 10 4.00% 81.20% MR684 8 8 3.20% 84.40% MR7419 3 3 6 2.40% 86.80% MR4974 5 5 2.00% 88.80% MR2576 2 2 4 1.60% 90.40% MR4814 3 3 1.20% 91.60% MR7127 2 1 3 1.20% 92.80% MR7932 2 1 3 1.20% 94.00% MR91 1 1 2 0.80% 94.80% MR484 1 1 2 0.80% 95.60% MR8023 2 2 0.80% 96.40% MR6466 1 1 0.40% 96.80% MR7032 1 1 0.40% 97.20% MR7326 1 1 0.40% 97.60% MR7468 1 1 0.40% 98.00% MR7509 1 1 0.40% 98.40% MR7820 1 1 0.40% 98.80% MR7892 1 1 0.40% 99.20% MR8016 1 1 0.40% 99.60% MR8022 1 1 0.40% 100.00% 153 0 97 250 100.00% 27% (22/81) of the average hospital population experienced some form of confinement event during 3Q2017. Five of these patients (6% of the average hospital population) accounted for 87% of the confinement events. V28) Riverview demonstrates that, on a review of two quarters of data, for 95% of seclusion events, seclusion was employed only when absolutely necessary to protect the patient from causing physical harm to self or others or for the management of violent behavior;
2017Q3.docx