will be evaluated as described in each criterion). Each criterion has an assigned number of possible points, and is divided into multiple sub-criteria. The sub-criteria are not equally weighted. The Project Narrative (Attachment 4) must respond to each sub-criterion, unless otherwise indicated. The minimum passing score for criteria 1−4 is 49.00 points and the total minimum passing score is 70.00 out of 100 points for criteria 1 to 7. The points for criteria 5−7 will only be applied to proposals that achieve the minimum score for criteria 1−4. The points for criteria 8-10 will only be applied to proposals that achieve the minimum scores for criteria 1-4 and criteria 1-7. Scoring Scale % of Possible Interpretation Explanation for Percentage Points Points The response to address the criteria. Not 0% The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and Responsive unacceptable. The response minimally addresses the criteria. Minimally 10-30% The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and Responsive unacceptable. The response addresses the criteria. are one or more omissions, flaws, or defects or the 40-60% Inadequate criteria are addressed in a limited way that results in a low degree of confidence in the proposed solution. The response adequately addresses the criteria. 70% Adequate Any omissions, flaws, or defects are inconsequential and acceptable. The response fully addresses the criteria with a good degree of confidence in the applicant’s response or proposed solution. 80% Good There are no identified omissions, flaws, or defects. Any identified weaknesses are minimal, inconsequential, and acceptable. The response fully addresses the criteria with a high degree of confidence in the applicant’s response or 90% Excellent proposed solution. The applicant offers one or more enhancing features, methods, or approaches that exceed expectations. All criteria are addressed with the highest degree of confidence in the applicant’s response or proposed solution. 100% Exceptional The response exceeds the requirements in providing multiple enhancing features, a creative approach, or an exceptional solution. Scoring CRITERIA The Project Narrative (Attachment 4) must respond to each criterion unless otherwise indicated.
will be evaluated as described in each criterion). Each criterion has an assigned number of possible points, and is divided into multiple sub-criteria. The sub-criteria are not equally weighted. The Project Narrative (Attachment 4) must respond to each sub-criterion, unless otherwise indicated. The minimum passing score for criteria 1−4 is 49.00 points and the total minimum passing score is 70.00 out of 100 points for criteria 1 to 7. The points for criteria 5−7 will only be applied to proposals that achieve the minimum score for criteria 1−4. The points for criteria 8-10 will only be applied to proposals that achieve the minimum scores for criteria 1-4 and criteria 1-7. Scoring Scale % of Possible Points Interpretation Explanation for Percentage Points 0% Not Responsive The response to address the criteria. The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and unacceptable. 10-30% Minimally Responsive The response minimally addresses the criteria. The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and unacceptable. 40-60% Inadequate The response addresses the criteria. are one or more omissions, flaws, or defects or the criteria are addressed in a limited way that results in a low degree of confidence in the proposed solution. 70% Adequate The response adequately addresses the criteria. Any omissions, flaws, or defects are inconsequential and acceptable. 80% Good The response fully addresses the criteria with a good degree of confidence in the applicant’s response or proposed solution. There are no identified omissions, flaws, or defects. Any identified weaknesses are minimal, inconsequential, and acceptable. 90% Excellent The response fully addresses the criteria with a high degree of confidence in the applicant’s response or proposed solution. The applicant offers one or more enhancing features, methods, or approaches that exceed expectations. 100% Exceptional All criteria are addressed with the highest degree of confidence in the applicant’s response or proposed solution. The response exceeds the requirements in providing multiple enhancing features, a creative approach, or an exceptional solution. Scoring CRITERIA The Project Narrative (Attachment 4) must respond to each criterion unless otherwise indicated.
00_GFO-16-306_EPIC_Solilcitation%20Manual_2016-10-19.docx