Table 5.3. Native vegetation WTPa Unit Type and Study year of studyb Healthy riverside $1.74-$3.63 % of CM - 2000 Morrison and vegetation covered/household Bennett (2004) Native riverside $3.71-$5.53 km increase in native CM - 2008 Kragt and vegetation riverside vegetation/ Bennett (2009) household Healthy floodplain $1.67-$1.99 % of healthy vegetation CM - 2000 Loch et al (2002) vegetation remaining/household/year Healthy floodplain $0.88-$4.26 % of healthy vegetation CM 2003 Windle and Rolfe – vegetation remaining/household/year (2004) Native vegetation $3.71-$6.23 % increase of healthy CM 2006 Kragt et al (2007) – vegetation along river/ household Preservation of tea $26.52 ha/ year CM - 1998 Mallawaarachchi tree woodlands et al (2001) Notes. a. Expressed in $2011 (ABS 2012). Reported values are central measures. Where a range is indicated, it represents the central measures for a number of model specifications, not a confidence interval. You should refer to the original studies to obtain confidence intervals (and other relevant information) for these estimates. b. CM = Choice Modelling. Table 5.4. Aesthetics / National Parks WTPa Unit Type and Study year of studyb Rural lands $0.09 10 000 ha CM - 2001 Van Bueren and restored/ protected restored/ Bennett (2004) household/ year Hiking Tropical $192.33-$686.77c visit TCM - 2001 Nillesen et al – National Park (2005) National park visits $24.20-$26.89c visit TCM - 1995 Bennett (1995) Notes. a. Expressed in $2011 (ABS 2012). Reported values are central measures. Where a range is indicated, it represents the central measures for a number of model specifications, not a confidence interval. You should refer to the original studies to obtain confidence intervals (and other relevant information) for these estimates. b. CM = Choice Modelling, TCM = Travel Cost Method. c. This is the consumer surplus per visitor that is, the benefit to the – visitor over and above the costs of travelling to the area.
Table 5.3. Native vegetation WTPa Unit Type and year of studyb Study Healthy riverside vegetation $1.74-$3.63 % of covered/household CM - 2000 Morrison and Bennett (2004) Native riverside vegetation $3.71-$5.53 km increase in native riverside vegetation/ household CM - 2008 Kragt and Bennett (2009) Healthy floodplain vegetation $1.67-$1.99 % of healthy vegetation remaining/household/year CM - 2000 Loch et al (2002) Healthy floodplain vegetation $0.88-$4.26 % of healthy vegetation remaining/household/year CM – 2003 Windle and Rolfe (2004) Native vegetation $3.71-$6.23 % increase of healthy vegetation along river/ household CM – 2006 Kragt et al (2007) Preservation of tea tree woodlands $26.52 ha/ year CM - 1998 Mallawaarachchi et al (2001) Notes. a. Expressed in $2011 (ABS 2012). Reported values are central measures. Where a range is indicated, it represents the central measures for a number of model specifications, not a confidence interval. You should refer to the original studies to obtain confidence intervals (and other relevant information) for these estimates. b. CM = Choice Modelling. Table 5.4. Aesthetics / National Parks WTPa Unit Type and year of studyb Study Rural lands restored/ protected $0.09 10 000 ha restored/ household/ year CM - 2001 Van Bueren and Bennett (2004) Hiking – Tropical National Park $192.33-$686.77c visit TCM - 2001 Nillesen et al (2005) National park visits $24.20-$26.89c visit TCM - 1995 Bennett (1995) Notes. a. Expressed in $2011 (ABS 2012). Reported values are central measures. Where a range is indicated, it represents the central measures for a number of model specifications, not a confidence interval. You should refer to the original studies to obtain confidence intervals (and other relevant information) for these estimates. b. CM = Choice Modelling, TCM = Travel Cost Method. c. This is the consumer surplus per visitor – that is, the benefit to the visitor over and above the costs of travelling to the area.
012a_Research_Report_Environment.docx