Appointments of 9 Contracts awarded An appointed person Consequence: contractors/ to service checks to ensure that Likelihood: consultants are not in providers/vendors all procurement Risk Rating: accordance with the without adherence activities need to University’s to the University’s comply with the procurement policy Procurement University’s and procedures. procurement threshold policy. Procurement being requirements. divided or split into Independent and separate parts to objective members on circumvent the the evaluation are procurement threshold. to ensure the Purchasing goods procurement process is and/or services from undertaken in suppliers who are accordance with current employees of appropriate probity the University. and approval process.
9 Contracts awarded to service providers/vendors without adherence to the University’s Procurement policy. Appointments of contractors/ consultants are not in accordance with the University’s procurement policy and procedures. Procurement being divided or split into separate parts to circumvent the procurement threshold. Purchasing goods and/or services from suppliers who are current employees of the University. An appointed person checks to ensure that all procurement activities need to comply with the University’s procurement threshold requirements. Independent and objective members on the evaluation are to ensure the procurement process is undertaken in accordance with appropriate probity and approval process. Consequence: Likelihood: Risk Rating:
2017%20Fraud%20Risk%20Assessment%20template.docx