American political behavior is replete with examples of situations in which people’s political behaviors are influenced by their perceptions of the attitudes or experiences of mass collectives.” For instance, being informed that voter turnout is likely to be high in an upcoming election has also been shown to significantly increase actual turnout (Gerber and Rogers 2009). As defined above, efficacy refers to beliefs about whether one’s own actions exert an influence on collective outcomes. Prior research has shown that individuals base their actions, in part, on perceptions about the likely actions of others, as well as using their own behavior as a diagnostic cue of how others will act (e.g., see Quattrone and Tversky 1984, experiment 2). Thus, a pro-energy-conservation norm should provide a context in which taking action is perceived as efficacious. Consequently, I predict that a pro-conservation norm will moderate (i.e., strengthen) the impact of an appeal for action to conserve energy - increasing favorable attitudes, intentions, and actions (relative to the appeal alone and to the appeal in conjunction (hypothesis 4). with a norm behavioral cue) “con” Experimental Procedure and Design To test the hypotheses previously stated, I designed a survey- experiment. The was implemented by Bovitz Research Group in December of 2009, using a web-based panel that draws a sample demographically representative of the overall U.S. population. Each respondent (n = 500) agreed to participate in an IRB-approved about political learning” and was “study informed he or she would be paid $1 for completing the survey. The main dependent variables consisted of measures for: (a) attitudes about the importance and (b) efficacy of conserving energy, (c) intentions talk with others about ways to reduce energy consumption, and (d) a measure of overt behavior i.e., whether at the conclusion –
American political behavior is replete with examples of situations in which people’s political behaviors are influenced by their perceptions of the attitudes or experiences of mass collectives.” For instance, being informed that voter turnout is likely to be high in an upcoming election has also been shown to significantly increase actual turnout (Gerber and Rogers 2009). As defined above, efficacy refers to beliefs about whether one’s own actions exert an influence on collective outcomes. Prior research has shown that individuals base their actions, in part, on perceptions about the likely actions of others, as well as using their own behavior as a diagnostic cue of how others will act (e.g., see Quattrone and Tversky 1984, experiment 2). Thus, a pro-energy-conservation norm should provide a context in which taking action is perceived as efficacious. Consequently, I predict that a pro-conservation norm will moderate (i.e., strengthen) the impact of an appeal for action to conserve energy - increasing favorable attitudes, intentions, and actions (relative to the appeal alone and to the appeal in conjunction with a “con” norm behavioral cue) (hypothesis 4). Experimental Procedure and Design To test the hypotheses previously stated, I designed a survey- experiment. The was implemented by Bovitz Research Group in December of 2009, using a web-based panel that draws a sample demographically representative of the overall U.S. population. Each respondent (n = 500) agreed to participate in an IRB-approved “study about political learning” and was informed he or she would be paid $1 for completing the survey. The main dependent variables consisted of measures for: (a) attitudes about the importance and (b) efficacy of conserving energy, (c) intentions talk with others about ways to reduce energy consumption, and (d) a measure of overt behavior – i.e., whether at the conclusion
Bolsen%20Norms%20Threat%20Appeals%20and%20Actions%20for%20the%20Public%20Good.docx