Area Quality Reviews; dip sampling by senior managers etc. We are not persuaded currently that a further formal review is required. Can we suggest therefore that the recommendation is removed? Recommendation 6: National For the Home Office to review role of Christian 30/11/2016 13/01/2017 – That the Home statutory bodies within the Act and Papalleontiou, Letter sent to Mr Response Office consider whether CAFCASS should be an of the DHR Christian received from adding CAFCASS as addition Quality Papalleontiou, Chair of the a statutory body Assurance Panel Chair of the DHR Home Office within the meaning Home Office Quality Assurance DHR Quality of the Act. Panel at the Home Assurance Panel Office. Christian – Papaleontiou. Although the Lead The Home Agency for Office have Recommendation 6 discussed is the Home Office, CAFCASS a letter from LSCB involvement Chair dated and in relation 17/11/2016 has to DHRs, included a response CAFCASS seeks to this the court’s permission for
Area Quality Reviews; dip sampling by senior managers etc. We are not persuaded currently that a further formal review is required. Can we suggest therefore that the recommendation is removed? Recommendation 6: That the Home Office consider adding CAFCASS as a statutory body within the meaning of the Act. National For the Home Office to review role of statutory bodies within the Act and whether CAFCASS should be an addition Christian Papalleontiou, of the DHR Quality Assurance Panel Home Office 30/11/2016 Letter sent to Mr Christian Papalleontiou, Chair of the DHR Quality Assurance Panel at the Home Office. Although the Lead Agency for Recommendation 6 is the Home Office, a letter from LSCB Chair dated 17/11/2016 has included a response to this 13/01/2017 – Response received from Chair of the Home Office DHR Quality Assurance Panel – Christian Papaleontiou. The Home Office have discussed CAFCASS involvement and in relation to DHRs, CAFCASS seeks the court’s permission for
2017.11.30-Appendix-B-Action-Plan-for-CSP-Updated-18-October-2017.docx