CHAPTER 3 THE MARXISTS AND THE NATIONAL QUESTION (10) PIERRE SOUYRI In this chapter we present the reading scores of Pierre Souyri, published in the Annals of July, 1979, concerning the volume of Georges Haupt, Michel Lowy, Claudie Weill, entitled The Marxists and the national question, 1848-1914. We enamel his scores of our comments identified by letters EDITOR'S NOTE. Pierre Souyri wrote this about the Marxism and the national question: «By establishing this issue which gathers some of the texts whose publication marked out the stands, alternately complementary and opposite, of the theorists of the Second International on the national question, G. Haupt, M. Lowy and C. Weill took care of not favoring the conceptions of the Bolsheviks. This choice has not only the advantage to make know to the readers points of view whom the hegemony of Russian Marxism had rejected in the oversight; it also allows to break with a commonplace and nevertheless unbearable representation which orders the history of the Marxist theories, as if there was a Marxism establishing a coherent and completed system, of which the Bolsheviks would have regained control on the methodology and the concepts to emerge, finally, after all other theorists of the
CHAPTER 3 THE MARXISTS AND THE NATIONAL QUESTION (10) PIERRE SOUYRI In this chapter we present the reading scores of Pierre Souyri, published in the Annals of July, 1979, concerning the volume of Georges Haupt, Michel Lowy, Claudie Weill, entitled The Marxists and the national question, 1848-1914. We enamel his scores of our comments identified by letters EDITOR'S NOTE. Pierre Souyri wrote this about the Marxism and the national question: «By establishing this issue which gathers some of the texts whose publication marked out the stands, alternately complementary and opposite, of the theorists of the Second International on the national question, G. Haupt, M. Lowy and C. Weill took care of not favoring the conceptions of the Bolsheviks. This choice has not only the advantage to make know to the readers points of view whom the hegemony of Russian Marxism had rejected in the oversight; it also allows to break with a commonplace and nevertheless unbearable representation which orders the history of the Marxist theories, as if there was a Marxism establishing a coherent and completed system, of which the Bolsheviks would have regained control on the methodology and the concepts to emerge, finally, after all other theorists of the
bon-NATIONAL-QUESTION-AND-PROLETARIAN-REVOLUTION-UNDER-THE-MODERN-IMPERIALISM-revision.docx