Academic Innovation Award Rubric Name of Applicant: Amount requested: $ Please enter a score at right for each of the following 4 items using the 5-point scale below. The highest average scores will be recommended for funding. 5-4 Meets or exceeds 3-2 Meets some, but not 1-0 Meets few scores expectations all expectations expectations Clearly states the merits of the proposal and its congruence with Indicates limited merit and value. to provide connections of the mission and vision of the AIC. Merit and Questions exist as to connections merit and value or connect Clearly states how it will facilitate to AIC mission and vision proposal to AIC mission and Value collaboration and innovation in statements. vision statements. teaching, learning, and/or research. Clear descriptions, terminology A question exists as to the Terminology is unclear (only a was defined and clarified. No terminology and/or purpose, or person in the field would questions as to meaning or could only be determined by Quality understand). Weak connections purpose exist. Validity and context. Validity and significance between validity and significance, significance clearly connects to partially connects to merit, and merit, feasibility, and budget. merit, feasibility, and budget. feasibility, and budget. Timeline is clearly articulated and Timeline is vague or does not provides evidence the task can be indicate task can be a timeline and evidence of Feasibility accomplished. Indicates specific accomplished in the timeline feasibility. elements of project related to provided. award, if a multi-stage project. Does not provide an itemized Budget appears to lack items or Provides an itemized budget that budget nor show evidence of, or Budget does not completely observe observes university regulations. observance to, university university regulations. regulations. TOTAL SCORE:
Academic Innovation Award Rubric Name of Applicant: Amount requested: $ Please enter a score at right for each of the following 4 items using the 5-point scale below. The highest average scores will be recommended for funding. 5-4 Meets or exceeds expectations 3-2 Meets some, but not all expectations 1-0 Meets few expectations scores Merit and Value Clearly states the merits of the proposal and its congruence with the mission and vision of the AIC. Clearly states how it will facilitate collaboration and innovation in teaching, learning, and/or research. Indicates limited merit and value. Questions exist as to connections to AIC mission and vision statements. to provide connections of merit and value or connect proposal to AIC mission and vision statements. Quality Clear descriptions, terminology was defined and clarified. No questions as to meaning or purpose exist. Validity and significance clearly connects to merit, feasibility, and budget. A question exists as to the terminology and/or purpose, or could only be determined by context. Validity and significance partially connects to merit, feasibility, and budget. Terminology is unclear (only a person in the field would understand). Weak connections between validity and significance, and merit, feasibility, and budget. Feasibility Timeline is clearly articulated and provides evidence the task can be accomplished. Indicates specific elements of project related to award, if a multi-stage project. Timeline is vague or does not indicate task can be accomplished in the timeline provided. a timeline and evidence of feasibility. Budget Provides an itemized budget that observes university regulations. Budget appears to lack items or does not completely observe university regulations. Does not provide an itemized budget nor show evidence of, or observance to, university regulations. TOTAL SCORE:
2018-19-aic-award-rubric.docx