Rubric for Mid Internship Report Internship in Biomedical Informatics – Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Score 1 2 3 4 Introduction Does not give any very little Gives too much Presents a concise information about information. information. More lead-in to the report. what to expect in the like a summary. report. Aim The purpose or aim The central aim or The writing has a The writer's central is generally unclear. argument is not clear aim or aim or argument is consistently clear argument, but may readily apparent to throughout the sometimes digress the reader. paper. from it. Content The central aim or Information supports Information provides Balanced argument is not a central aim or reasonable support presentation of clearly identified. argument at times. for a central aim or relevant and Analysis is or Analysis is basic or argument and legitimate not evident. Reader general. Reader displays evidence of information that is confused or may gains few insights. a basic analysis of a clearly supports a be misinformed. significant topic. central aim or process Reader gains some argument and a insights. thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Scientific Reader gains important insights. Procedures Not sequential, most Some of the steps Most of the steps Presents steps are missing or are understandable; are understandable; which are are confusing. most are confusing some lack detail or logical and and lack detail. are confusing. adequately detailed. Data & Data tables and/or Both complete, Both accurate, some Data tables, results Results graphs missing minor inaccuracies ill-formed and graphs neatly information and are and/or illegible characters. completed and inaccurate. characters. totally accurate. Conclusions Presents an illogical Presents an illogical Presents a logical Presents a logical explanation for explanation for explanation for explanation for findings and does findings and findings and findings and
Rubric for Mid Internship Report – Internship in Biomedical Informatics Beginning 1 Developing 2 Accomplished 3 Exemplary 4 Score Scientific process Introduction Does not give any information about what to expect in the report. very little information. Gives too much information. More like a summary. Presents a concise lead-in to the report. Aim The purpose or aim is generally unclear. The central aim or argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper. The writing has a clear aim or argument, but may sometimes digress from it. The writer's central aim or argument is readily apparent to the reader. Content The central aim or argument is not clearly identified. Analysis is or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed. Information supports a central aim or argument at times. Analysis is basic or general. Reader gains few insights. Information provides reasonable support for a central aim or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains some insights. Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central aim or argument and a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights. Procedures Not sequential, most steps are missing or are confusing. Some of the steps are understandable; most are confusing and lack detail. Most of the steps are understandable; some lack detail or are confusing. Presents which are logical and adequately detailed. Data & Results Data tables and/or graphs missing information and are inaccurate. Both complete, minor inaccuracies and/or illegible characters. Both accurate, some ill-formed characters. Data tables, results and graphs neatly completed and totally accurate. Conclusions Presents an illogical explanation for findings and does Presents an illogical explanation for findings and Presents a logical explanation for findings and Presents a logical explanation for findings and
Biomedical-Informatics-Internship-Manual-Summer-2015.docx