Competence in policy conceptualisation, analysis and implementation Knowledge of more than one functional municipal field / discipline Skills in Mediation Skills in Governance Competence as required by other national line sector departments Exceptional and dynamic creativity to improve the functioning of the municipality Total percentage 100% As guided by the Performance Regulations of 2006, Dannhauser Municipality has established an evaluation to assess the Section 54/56 Managers. The evaluation panel is as per Performance Regulations of 2006. 6.8 EVALUATION Each KPAs and CCRs stated in 4.3 and 4.4 respectively will be provided an indicative rating of not more than 5-points. Each rating’ is defined in the table below: ‘indicative 6.5: Performance Assessment Rating Percentage Percentage Term Description Rating Performance Total Score Bonus Performance far exceeds the standard Level 5: 166% - 167% 14% Outstanding expected of a member at this The 161% - 165% 13% performance appraisal indicates that the jobholder has 156% - 160% 12% 5 >150% achieved exceptional results against all performance criteria and indicators and 151% - 155% 11% maintained this in all areas of 150% 10% responsibility throughout the year. Performance is significantly higher than Level 4: 146% - 149% 9% Performance the standard expected in the job. The 140% - 145% 8% significantly appraisal indicates that the member has 136% - 139% 7% above achieved better than fully effective 4 expectations results against more than half of the 131% - 135% 6% >130% performance criteria and indicators and fully achieved all others throughout the 130% 5% year.
Competence in policy conceptualisation, analysis and implementation Knowledge of more than one functional municipal field / discipline Skills in Mediation Skills in Governance Competence as required by other national line sector departments Exceptional and dynamic creativity to improve the functioning of the municipality Total percentage 100% As guided by the Performance Regulations of 2006, Dannhauser Municipality has established an evaluation to assess the Section 54/56 Managers. The evaluation panel is as per Performance Regulations of 2006. 6.8 Each KPAs and CCRs stated in 4.3 and 4.4 respectively will be provided an indicative rating of not more than 5-points. Each ‘indicative rating’ is defined in the table below: 6.5: Performance Assessment Rating Term Description Rating Percentage Total Score Percentage Performance Bonus Level 5: Outstanding performance >150% Performance far exceeds the standard expected of a member at this The appraisal indicates that the jobholder has achieved exceptional results against all performance criteria and indicators and maintained this in all areas of responsibility throughout the year. 5 166% - 167% 14% 161% - 165% 13% 156% - 160% 12% 151% - 155% 11% 150% 10% Level 4: Performance significantly above expectations >130% Performance is significantly higher than the standard expected in the job. The appraisal indicates that the member has achieved better than fully effective results against more than half of the performance criteria and indicators and fully achieved all others throughout the year. 4 146% - 149% 9% 140% - 145% 8% 136% - 139% 7% 131% - 135% 6% 130% 5% EVALUATION
2017_2018%20PMS%20Review_20Jul2017.docx