(no name) Include more real case studies. (Nidal) [no comment] (Ali) [no comment] (Saeideh) [no comment] (Mario) [no comment] (Rakesh) No, it is satisfactory. (Govinda) It can be abundant from time to time according to change happened for world. (Andro) [no comment] Presentation The form asks, The presentation and facilitation of the workshop was: Poor, Adequate, Good, Very good. The responses were: Very 0 0 4 12 Presentation evaluation: Poor Adequate Good good The form invites comments on each of the two trainers: Ana Urgoiti Hadrill (no name) Highly energetic Uses Wonderful trainer. Links learning to flipchart exceptionally well. Use of various experiences. Sometimes low in other tools/methods also good. voice. Visiting to participants groups can be improved which will help participants get more connected. (Jiige) Thank you. Thank you. (Sushmita) Very energetic, very good Very calm, very composed, facilitator once hurt my feelings for complementing Ana nicely. Perhaps could animals maybe a little more sensitive initiate some group works. It will help – about animals. know how calmly you can manage that. (Mathias) Excellent animator. Similarly excellent presenter, very Thorough knowledge about training thorough knowledge. Spreads confidence methodologies, but as well livelihoods and a certain comfort among participants! and humanitarian approach. Very Extremely professional and friendly. positive person! (no name) Very good, thanks. Very good, thanks. (Ephraim) Good presenter and trainer. Good presenter and trainer. (Mandefro) Keep up the style you used I like the way you handled the sessions along the course of the training. Pleased and your technical explanations which meeting you! based on your life-long experiences. Pleased meeting you! (James) Well experienced Good trainer. Humble. knowledgeable trainer. (no name) She created such a casual Helpful, supportive and always ready and environment which really helps willing to help. someone as shy as me.
(no name) Include more real case studies. (Nidal) [no comment] (Ali) [no comment] (Saeideh) [no comment] (Mario) [no comment] (Rakesh) No, it is satisfactory. (Govinda) It can be abundant from time to time according to change happened for world. (Andro) [no comment] Presentation The form asks, The presentation and facilitation of the workshop was: Poor, Adequate, Good, Very good. The responses were: Presentation evaluation: Poor 0 Adequate 0 Good 4 Very good 12 The form invites comments on each of the two trainers: Ana Urgoiti Hadrill (no name) Highly energetic Uses flipchart exceptionally well. Use of other tools/methods also good. Wonderful trainer. Links learning to various experiences. Sometimes low in voice. Visiting to participants groups can be improved which will help participants get more connected. (Jiige) Thank you. Thank you. (Sushmita) Very energetic, very good facilitator once hurt my feelings for animals – maybe a little more sensitive about animals. Very calm, very composed, complementing Ana nicely. Perhaps could initiate some group works. It will help know how calmly you can manage that. (Mathias) Excellent animator. Thorough knowledge about training methodologies, but as well livelihoods and humanitarian approach. Very positive person! Similarly excellent presenter, very thorough knowledge. Spreads confidence and a certain comfort among participants! Extremely professional and friendly. (no name) Very good, thanks. Very good, thanks. (Ephraim) Good presenter and trainer. Good presenter and trainer. (Mandefro) Keep up the style you used along the course of the training. Pleased meeting you! I like the way you handled the sessions and your technical explanations which based on your life-long experiences. Pleased meeting you! (James) Well experienced knowledgeable trainer. Good trainer. Humble. (no name) She created such a casual environment which really helps someone as shy as me. Helpful, supportive and always ready and willing to help.
BKK-cost-recovery-LEGS-ToT-evaluation-summary.docx