Peer Editing Rubric for the Quantitative Article Review Author of Review: Corinne Blake Peer Editor: linda Tajima Summary 2.5 2 1.5 1 0 Total Purpose of the study No discussion of Purpose of the Purpose of the Purpose of the clearly and the purpose of Incomplete 1.5 study identified. is unclear. concisely identified. the study. Moderately well Little if any Thorough Good description description of description of description of of participants Description of participants sample. No participants/sample, sample and Incomplete 1 Participants/sample sample and mention of including sample sample selection sample sampling selection. procedures. selection. procedures. Research Design Research Design documented with documented with a general Research No research Research Design indicators of why recognition of Design design Incomplete 0 this is an appropriate why this is an documented. indicated. design. appropriate design. Method of Method of data collection and Method of data No method of collection and statistical collection and data or statistical Data Collection & procedure(s) used to statistical statistical Incomplete 0 procedure(s) Analysis analyze data is procedure procedures indicated and indicated and analyzed indicated. somewhat explained incorrectly explained. thoroughly. Tightly focused Generally Somewhat Scattered writing summarizing Results Incomplete 1 focused focused random writing the results of the summary of the summary of the without focus on study
Peer Editing Rubric for the Quantitative Article Review Author of Review: Corinne Blake Peer Editor: linda Tajima Summary 2.5 2 1.5 1 0 Total Purpose of the Purpose of the study clearly and concisely identified. Purpose of the study identified. Purpose of the is unclear. No discussion of the purpose of the study. Incomplete 1.5 Description of Participants/sample Thorough description of participants/sample, including sample selection. Good description of participants sample and sample selection procedures. Moderately well description of participants sample and sample selection. Little if any description of sample. No mention of sampling procedures. Incomplete 1 Research Design Research Design documented with indicators of why this is an appropriate design. Research Design documented with a general recognition of why this is an appropriate design. Research Design documented. No research design indicated. Incomplete 0 Data Collection & Analysis Method of collection and statistical procedure(s) used to analyze data is indicated and explained thoroughly. Method of data collection and statistical procedure(s) indicated and somewhat explained. Method of data collection and statistical procedure analyzed incorrectly No method of data or statistical procedures indicated. Incomplete 0 Results Tightly focused writing summarizing the results of the study Generally focused summary of the Somewhat focused summary of the Scattered random writing without focus on Incomplete 1
blakec_educ518_quantitative_article_review.docx