Concise and hypotheses tend to Complete yet concise generally Incomplete be one-sided with Validity/rival discussion of the recognizes most aspects of the Incomplete 2.5 hypotheses validity/rival aspects of the hypotheses validity/rival hypotheses validity/rival discussion hypotheses hypotheses missing. Insight/Criticism Generally good Evidence only Original on fact, Opinion entirely evidence given in somewhat Incomplete 2 insight/Criticism research, or scholarly unsupported. support of opinion. supports opinion. authority. Complete yet concise Identifies Unclear No connection discussion of Implications implications for implications for between research Incomplete 2.5 implications of practice. practice. and practice. research on practice Writing/Style Free of spelling, syntax, and Many errors. Poor Only a few errors of grammatical errors. A number of grammar and minor significance Well-edited material. Writing & APA errors. Not well sentence structure Incomplete 1.5 with grammar and edited. as well as APA APA style applied APA errors consistently throughout Total 21/25 Peer Comments: Overall, good flow of an article review. The review covers the requirements. Following are provided for your information/action if you wish to incorporate them. APA style is not correct in many areas and various errors found. All quotes always need author, year and page number. Sometimes page number provided, but not always. Check title page. Font for Running head: needs to be Times New Roman and note need for lowercase h in the word head. Right margin is off on page 1. Second paragraph is wordy and confusing. You initially state the number of participants include 44 6th grade students (check the correct way numbers should be expressed numerically APA style- pp. 111-112 in
Validity/rival hypotheses Complete yet concise discussion of the validity/rival hypotheses Concise and generally recognizes most aspects of the validity/rival hypotheses hypotheses tend to be one-sided with aspects of the validity/rival hypotheses missing. Incomplete hypotheses discussion Incomplete 2.5 Original insight/Criticism Insight/Criticism on fact, research, or scholarly authority. Generally good evidence given in support of opinion. Evidence only somewhat supports opinion. Opinion entirely unsupported. Incomplete 2 Implications Complete yet concise discussion of implications of research on practice Identifies implications for practice. Unclear implications for practice. No connection between research and practice. Incomplete 2.5 Writing/Style Writing & APA Free of spelling, syntax, and grammatical errors. Well-edited material. APA style applied consistently throughout Only a few errors of minor significance with grammar and APA A number of errors. Not well edited. Many errors. Poor grammar and sentence structure as well as APA errors Incomplete 1.5 Total 21/25 Peer Comments: Overall, good flow of an article review. The review covers the requirements. Following are provided for your information/action if you wish to incorporate them. APA style is not correct in many areas and various errors found. All quotes always need author, year and page number. Sometimes page number provided, but not always. Check title page. Font for Running head: needs to be Times New Roman and note need for lowercase h in the word head. Right margin is off on page 1. Second paragraph is wordy and confusing. You initially state the number of participants include 44 6th grade students (check the correct way numbers should be expressed numerically APA style- pp. 111-112 in
blakec_educ518_qualitative_article_review.docx