PI The review of student records and The district must provide Please submit evidence SE 4 Student interviews indicated that each training to members of staff training, Record Report of Assessment person conducting an assessment responsible for completing including the agenda and Review Results did not always summarize in evaluations and writing signed attendance sheets writing the procedures employed, assessment summaries on the (include the name and Staff the results, and the diagnostic content requirements. role of staff), provided to Interviews impression, and did not always evaluators involved in define in detail and in The district must develop a writing assessment educationally relevant and monitoring system which should summaries. common terms, the student's include supervisory oversight needs, offering explicit means of and periodic reviews of Submit a detailed meeting them. evaluation reports to ensure narrative description of evaluators develop complete the oversight system summaries. including the identity of the person(s) responsible The district must conduct an for the oversight by internal review of student name and title; the date records from initial evaluations of the system's or re-evaluations that occurred implementation and the after all other corrective actions frequency of the district's have been implemented. Review monitoring. the assessment reports to ensure school personnel provided Submit all of the above summaries with all the required by November 5, 2012. elements. Submit a report of the Please note when conducting results of the internal internal monitoring that review of student school must maintain the records. Include the following documentation and following: make it available to the Number of records Department upon request: a) reviewed;
SE 4 Report of Assessment Results PI Student Record Review Staff Interviews The review of student records and interviews indicated that each person conducting an assessment did not always summarize in writing the procedures employed, the results, and the diagnostic impression, and did not always define in detail and in educationally relevant and common terms, the student's needs, offering explicit means of meeting them. The district must provide training to members responsible for completing evaluations and writing assessment summaries on the content requirements. The district must develop a monitoring system which should include supervisory oversight and periodic reviews of evaluation reports to ensure evaluators develop complete summaries. The district must conduct an internal review of student records from initial evaluations or re-evaluations that occurred after all other corrective actions have been implemented. Review the assessment reports to ensure school personnel provided summaries with all the required elements. Please note when conducting internal monitoring that school must maintain the following documentation and make it available to the Department upon request: a) Please submit evidence of staff training, including the agenda and signed attendance sheets (include the name and role of staff), provided to evaluators involved in writing assessment summaries. Submit a detailed narrative description of the oversight system including the identity of the person(s) responsible for the oversight by name and title; the date of the system's implementation and the frequency of the district's monitoring. Submit all of the above by November 5, 2012. Submit a report of the results of the internal review of student records. Include the following: Number of records reviewed;
0181.docx