201725 - Literature Evaluation Table Rubric 2 1 3 5 Less Than 4 Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Excellent Satisfactory Good 80-89% 89.00% 0.00% 79.00% 100.00% 75.00% 100.0 %Article Selection Author, journal Author, journal (peer-reviewed), Author, journal Author, journal (peer-reviewed), Author, journal and permalink or 5.0 % Author, (peer-reviewed), (peer-reviewed), and permalink or (peer-reviewed), working link to Journal and permalink or and permalink or working link to and permalink or access article and working link to working link to access article working link to section is Permalink or access article access article section is access article comprehensive Working Link to section is clearly section is not present, but it section is and thoroughly Access Article provided and included. lacks detail or is present. developed with well developed. incomplete. supporting details. Article title and Article title and year published Article title and Article title and year published Article and section is 5.0 % Article year published year published section is year published comprehensive Title and Year section is clearly section is not present, but it section is and thoroughly Published provided and included. lacks detail or is present. developed with well developed. incomplete. supporting details. Research Research Research Research questions Research questions questions 10.0 % Research questions (qualitative) or questions (qualitative) or (qualitative) or Questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (qualitative) or hypothesis hypothesis (Qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), hypothesis (quantitative), (quantitative), Hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or (quantitative), and purposes or and purposes or (Quantitative), and purposes or aim of study and purposes or aim of study aim of and Purposes or aim of study section is aim of study section is section is clearly Aim of Study section is not present, but it section is comprehensive provided and included. lacks detail or is present. and thoroughly well developed. incomplete. developed with
201725 - Literature Evaluation Table Rubric 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 80-89% 89.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 100.0 %Article Selection 5.0 % Author, Journal and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included. Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present. Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed. Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 5.0 % Article Title and Year Published Article title and year published section is not included. Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Article and year published section is present. Article title and year published section is clearly provided and well developed. Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 10.0 % Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of section is clearly provided and well developed. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with
201725-Literature-Evaluation-Table-Rubric-1.docx