II.D.3 Documenting students’ achievements and outcomes that demonstrate the program’s effectiveness. All accredited doctoral programs are expected to document student achievement in the program and to look at post-graduation outcomes. Accredited programs are also expected to prepare students for entry-level practice and the program's achievement of this should be reflected in student success in achieving licensure after completion of the program. The outcomes of program graduates including licensure rate and other proximal and distal outcomes of program graduates shall be evaluated within the context of: the requirement that all accredited doctoral programs prepare students for practice; each program's expressed and implied stated educational aims and competencies; and statements made by the program to the public. Doctoral programs' specific educational aims and expected competencies may differ from one another; therefore there is no specified threshold or minimum number for reviewing a program's licensure rate. Instead the Commission on Accreditation shall use its professional judgment to determine if the program's licensure rate, in combination with other factors, such as attrition of students from the program and their time to degree, demonstrates students' successful preparation for entry-level practice in health service psychology. Supporting Material: UPLOAD OPTIONAL Focused Questions: Review: IR C-19 D: Licensure Rates for Doctoral Programs Discuss the licensure rate of program graduates. Include the licensure rate that appears in the program's "Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Data" section of its public documents in the narrative, and ensure that the rates listed in the narrative and in the disclosure data are consistent. II.(All) Additional information relevant to Section II. Supporting Material: UPLOAD OPTIONAL Focused Questions: (IF CURRENTLY ACCREDITED): In your program's last decision letter and/or other correspondence since the last review, did the CoA note any Section II issues to specifically address "in the next self-study"? If so, provide your response here. (IF CURRENTLY ACCREDITED): In your program's last decision letter and/or other correspondence since the last review, did the CoA note any other Section II issues to address (i.e., narrative responses due by a certain date)? If so, briefly describe what information was provided to the CoA and whether the CoA determined the issue was satisfactorily addressed. You may reference correspondence in the appendices as necessary, but provide a brief summary of those issues here.
II.D.3 Documenting students’ achievements and outcomes that demonstrate the program’s effectiveness. All accredited doctoral programs are expected to document student achievement in the program and to look at post-graduation outcomes. Accredited programs are also expected to prepare students for entry-level practice and the program's achievement of this should be reflected in student success in achieving licensure after completion of the program. The outcomes of program graduates including licensure rate and other proximal and distal outcomes of program graduates shall be evaluated within the context of: the requirement that all accredited doctoral programs prepare students for practice; each program's expressed and implied stated educational aims and competencies; and statements made by the program to the public. Doctoral programs' specific educational aims and expected competencies may differ from one another; therefore there is no specified threshold or minimum number for reviewing a program's licensure rate. Instead the Commission on Accreditation shall use its professional judgment to determine if the program's licensure rate, in combination with other factors, such as attrition of students from the program and their time to degree, demonstrates students' successful preparation for entry-level practice in health service psychology. Supporting Material: UPLOAD OPTIONAL Focused Questions: Review: IR C-19 D: Licensure Rates for Doctoral Programs Discuss the licensure rate of program graduates. Include the licensure rate that appears in the program's "Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Data" section of its public documents in the narrative, and ensure that the rates listed in the narrative and in the disclosure data are consistent. II.(All) Additional information relevant to Section II. Supporting Material: UPLOAD OPTIONAL Focused Questions: (IF CURRENTLY ACCREDITED): In your program's last decision letter and/or other correspondence since the last review, did the CoA note any Section II issues to specifically address "in the next self-study"? If so, provide your response here. (IF CURRENTLY ACCREDITED): In your program's last decision letter and/or other correspondence since the last review, did the CoA note any other Section II issues to address (i.e., narrative responses due by a certain date)? If so, briefly describe what information was provided to the CoA and whether the CoA determined the issue was satisfactorily addressed. You may reference correspondence in the appendices as necessary, but provide a brief summary of those issues here.
2018-doctoral-worksheet.docx