Response 54% 63% 66% 58% 54% 52% Rate Overall 5 2 3.5 3 3 teaching ability Learned in 3.7 4.4 4.3 3.8 3.9 this course Instructor 3.6 4.4 4.5 4 4 Effectiveness Timely 3.9 4.7 4.6 4.4 4.5 feedback Effectively 4.1 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.6 responded to students’ questions Used 3.2 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.5 instructor feedback to improve work Would 3 4.5 4.5 3.8 4 recommend to other students Spring 2016 course evaluations results by division. Division Academic Allied Business Communication Math and Social and Affairs Health and and Fine Arts Science Behavioral Technology Sciences Response 66% 51% 50% 56% 58% 48% Rate Overall 4.7 3.7 3.8 3.2 3.3 teaching ability Learned in 3.9 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2 this course Instructor 4.1 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.1 4.2 Effectiveness Timely 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 feedback Effectively 4.5 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.5 4.6 responded to students’ questions Used 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 instructor
Response Rate 54% 63% 66% 58% 54% 52% Overall teaching ability 5 2 3.5 3 3 Learned in this course 3.7 4.4 4.3 3.8 3.9 Instructor Effectiveness 3.6 4.4 4.5 4 4 Timely feedback 3.9 4.7 4.6 4.4 4.5 Effectively responded to students’ questions 4.1 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.6 Used instructor feedback to improve work 3.2 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.5 Would recommend to other students 3 4.5 4.5 3.8 4 Spring 2016 course evaluations results by division. Division Academic Affairs Allied Health Business and Technology Communication and Fine Arts Math and Science Social and Behavioral Sciences Response Rate 66% 51% 50% 56% 58% 48% Overall teaching ability 4.7 3.7 3.8 3.2 3.3 Learned in this course 3.9 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2 Instructor Effectiveness 4.1 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.1 4.2 Timely feedback 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 Effectively responded to students’ questions 4.5 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.5 4.6 Used instructor 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5
2017-Official-CASC-AssessmentplanforRegentsApproval2016.docx