2.D.2. Gives up on some May tell students that the Effectively models and Effectively models and students or subject or assignment is reinforces ways that reinforces ways that High communicates that challenging and that they need students can master students can consistently Expectations some cannot master to work hard but does little to challenging material master challenging material challenging material. counteract student through effective effort, through effective effort. misconceptions about innate rather than having to Successfully challenges ability. depend on innate ability. students’ misconceptions about innate ability. Is able to model this element. (check Summative Assessment completed at final 3-way meeting box to indicate level of performance) – Dimension 1 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Needs Improvement 3 - Proficient 4 - Exemplary Quality * Scope * Consistency * Evidence for rating: (to be completed by the Program Supervisor and Supervising Practitioner).Minimum required sources of evidence for assessment of this element are listed below. Candidate evidence provided in Evidence Binder may also be considered. Source of Evidence Evidence to Support the Ratings for 2.D.2: High Expectations Announced Observation #1 Student Feedback Survey Other: Other: Other: 4.A.1: Reflective Practice Summative Assessment 1 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Improvement 3 - Proficient 4 - Exemplary
2.D.2. High Expectations Gives up on some students or communicates that some cannot master challenging material. May tell students that the subject or assignment is challenging and that they need to work hard but does little to counteract student misconceptions about innate ability. Effectively models and reinforces ways that students can master challenging material through effective effort, rather than having to depend on innate ability. Effectively models and reinforces ways that students can consistently master challenging material through effective effort. Successfully challenges students’ misconceptions about innate ability. Is able to model this element. Summative Assessment – completed at final 3-way meeting (check box to indicate level of performance) Dimension 1 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Needs Improvement 3 - Proficient 4 - Exemplary Quality * Scope * Consistency * Evidence for rating: (to be completed by the Program Supervisor and Supervising Practitioner).Minimum required sources of evidence for assessment of this element are listed below. Candidate evidence provided in Evidence Binder may also be considered. Source of Evidence Evidence to Support the Ratings for 2.D.2: High Expectations Announced Observation #1 Student Feedback Survey Other: Other: Other: 4.A.1: Reflective Practice Summative Assessment 1 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Improvement 3 - Proficient 4 - Exemplary
2018%20CAP%20Form%20and%20Rubric%20-%20final.docx