and their share of public space provision - tend to be the result of dedicated, and very political, stakeholder negotiations. This paper, in contrast, explores different options of systematized approaches in the form of policies, regulations and incentive programs. Please find hereafter a concise explanation of the different forms of physical situation and type of provision strategies. In this list we marked those strategies that found also application in the online tool. The subsequent table identifies specific case-studies as combinations of these two attributes and conditions, which in turn get briefly explained in a short paragraph at the end of the chapter. Physical situation of a newly-created publicly accessible space: open land within the urban fabric, not directly attributed to an individual building (a square or park in the classical understanding) setback spaces between the street and a building in the center of a block or building ensemble (courtyard type) within or underneath a building (skydeck or pilotis type) leading through a building or private lot (“right of way” type) on top of a building along a special geographic feature, usually waterways or hills extension of existing sidewalks (street widening) public space as, or linked to a new infrastructure (bridge or pedestrian bridge) space, as a visual extension of public space (on private inaccessible land) “imaginary” Type of provision strategy: deliberately provided by public or private landowners* implemented by the city through land purchase (based on preemptive rights or not) implemented through private owner, based on place-specific code stipulations* implemented through private owner, based on amenity-related laws* implemented through public or private owner, based on laws of ecological preservation* implemented by the city, but financed through voluntary participation of private developers in schemes that allow for bonus development capacity in return for financial contributions implemented by private owners, based on voluntary participation in incentive schemes* implemented by the city, based on public pressure through protestation and informal appropriation implemented by partnerships, through the re-organization of scattered spaces open setback part of right of on top of street visual / land type building / way building widening related
and their share of public space provision - tend to be the result of dedicated, and very political, stakeholder negotiations. This paper, in contrast, explores different options of systematized approaches in the form of policies, regulations and incentive programs. Please find hereafter a concise explanation of the different forms of physical situation and type of provision strategies. In this list we marked those strategies that found also application in the online tool. The subsequent table identifies specific case-studies as combinations of these two attributes and conditions, which in turn get briefly explained in a short paragraph at the end of the chapter. Physical situation of a newly-created publicly accessible space: open land within the urban fabric, not directly attributed to an individual building (a square or park in the classical understanding) setback spaces between the street and a building in the center of a block or building ensemble (courtyard type) within or underneath a building (skydeck or pilotis type) leading through a building or private lot (“right of way” type) on top of a building along a special geographic feature, usually waterways or hills extension of existing sidewalks (street widening) public space as, or linked to a new infrastructure (bridge or pedestrian bridge) “imaginary” space, as a visual extension of public space (on private inaccessible land) Type of provision strategy: deliberately provided by public or private landowners* implemented by the city through land purchase (based on preemptive rights or not) implemented through private owner, based on place-specific code stipulations* implemented through private owner, based on amenity-related laws* implemented through public or private owner, based on laws of ecological preservation* implemented by the city, but financed through voluntary participation of private developers in schemes that allow for bonus development capacity in return for financial contributions implemented by private owners, based on voluntary participation in incentive schemes* implemented by the city, based on public pressure through protestation and informal appropriation implemented by partnerships, through the re-organization of scattered spaces open land setback type part of building / right of way on top of building street widening related visual /
Yi%20Firley.docx