B.70 If PBA methods used, is FAR37.604, Performance Work Statement 46.401(a) (PWS) or Statement of Objectives (SOO) in RFP, and a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (either in RFP or to be dev. by offeror)? SECTION C RECEIPT, EVAUATION AND AWARD – No. Action Item FAR/HHSAR/ Yes No N/A Comments NIH Policy Part Receipt C.1 Have proposals been received no FAR 15.208, later than time set for receipt of HHSAR 315.208 offers, and if not, are late proposals handled properly? C.2 Are proposal modifications, FAR 15.208, revisions, or withdrawals handled 315.208 properly? C.3 If proposal from FPI received, was FAR it timely and if so, was it properly 8.602(b)(4)(ii) considered? C.4 If electronic proposals were FAR 15.203(c) permitted, were any unreadable electronic bids handled properly? Evaluation C.5 If R&D was composition of HHSAR 315.305 technical evaluators proper? (a)(3)(ii) (F), NIH Manual 6315-1 C.6 If unsolicited proposal, were FAR 15.6, procedures appropriately followed? HHSAR 315.6
B.70 If PBA methods used, is Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Objectives (SOO) in RFP, and a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (either in RFP or to be dev. by offeror)? FAR37.604, 46.401(a) SECTION C – RECEIPT, EVAUATION AND AWARD No. Action Item FAR/HHSAR/ NIH Policy Part Yes No N/A Comments Receipt C.1 Have proposals been received no later than time set for receipt of offers, and if not, are late proposals handled properly? FAR 15.208, HHSAR 315.208 C.2 Are proposal modifications, revisions, or withdrawals handled properly? FAR 15.208, 315.208 C.3 If proposal from FPI received, was it timely and if so, was it properly considered? FAR 8.602(b)(4)(ii) C.4 If electronic proposals were permitted, were any unreadable electronic bids handled properly? FAR 15.203(c) Evaluation C.5 If R&D was composition of technical evaluators proper? HHSAR 315.305 (a)(3)(ii) (F), NIH Manual 6315-1 C.6 If unsolicited proposal, were procedures appropriately followed? FAR 15.6, HHSAR 315.6
BOCARvwChcklstNegDec11_508.docx