The Application Form identifies one or more test/ (project does not involve testing/ demonstration/ deployment site locations. demonstration/ All test/ demonstration/ deployment sites are located in a deployment California electric IOU service territories (PG&E, SDG&E, or activities) SCE). The application does not contain any confidential information or Pass Fail identify any portion of the application as confidential. The applicant has not included a statement or otherwise indicated Pass Fail that it will not accept the terms and conditions, or that acceptance is based on modifications to the terms and conditions. For funding: The proposal includes one or more support Pass Fail letters, a match funding commitment letter, and/or a demonstration/ deployment commitment letter, as specified in Attachment 11. If the proposal includes commitment letters that are not required and do not meet the requirements of Attachment 11, the letters will not be considered in the scoring Proposals that pass ALL One Screening Criteria will be evaluated based on the Scoring Criteria on the next page and the Scoring Scale below (with the exception of criteria 6−8, which will be evaluated as described in each criterion). Each criterion has an assigned number of possible points, and is divided into multiple sub-criteria. The sub-criteria are not equally weighted. The Project Narrative (Attachment 4) must respond to each sub-criterion, unless otherwise indicated. The total minimum passing score is 70.00 out of 100 points. The minimum passing for criteria 1−4 is 49.00 points. The points for criteria 5−8 will only be applied to proposals that achieve the minimum score for criteria 1−4. Scoring Scale % of Possible Interpretation Explanation for Percentage Points Points The response fails to address the criteria. Not 0% The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and Responsive unacceptable. The response minimally addresses the criteria. Minimally 10-30% The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and Responsive unacceptable. 40-60% Inadequate The response addresses the criteria.
The Application Form identifies one or more test/ demonstration/ deployment site locations. All test/ demonstration/ deployment sites are located in a California electric IOU service territories (PG&E, SDG&E, or SCE). (project does not involve testing/ demonstration/ deployment activities) The application does not contain any confidential information or identify any portion of the application as confidential. Pass Fail The applicant has not included a statement or otherwise indicated that it will not accept the terms and conditions, or that acceptance is based on modifications to the terms and conditions. Pass Fail For funding: The proposal includes one or more support letters, a match funding commitment letter, and/or a demonstration/ deployment commitment letter, as specified in Attachment 11. If the proposal includes commitment letters that are not required and do not meet the requirements of Attachment 11, the letters will not be considered in the scoring Pass Fail Proposals that pass ALL One Screening Criteria will be evaluated based on the Scoring Criteria on the next page and the Scoring Scale below (with the exception of criteria 6−8, which will be evaluated as described in each criterion). Each criterion has an assigned number of possible points, and is divided into multiple sub-criteria. The sub-criteria are not equally weighted. The Project Narrative (Attachment 4) must respond to each sub-criterion, unless otherwise indicated. The total minimum passing score is 70.00 out of 100 points. The minimum passing for criteria 1−4 is 49.00 points. The points for criteria 5−8 will only be applied to proposals that achieve the minimum score for criteria 1−4. Scoring Scale % of Possible Points Interpretation Explanation for Percentage Points 0% Not Responsive The response fails to address the criteria. The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and unacceptable. 10-30% Minimally Responsive The response minimally addresses the criteria. The omissions, flaws, or defects are significant and unacceptable. 40-60% Inadequate The response addresses the criteria.
00_GFO-15-323_EPIC-WaterGrants_Solicitation_Manual_2016-05-20.docx