Peer Editing Rubric for the Qualitative Article Review Author of Review: Corinne Blake Peer Editor: Linda Tajima Summary 2.5 2 1.5 1 0 Total Purpose of the No discussion of Purpose of the Purpose of the Purpose of the study clearly and concisely the purpose of the Incomplete 2.5 study identified. study is unclear. identified. study. Little, if any, Thorough description Good description of Acceptable description of of participants sample description of Description of sample. No participants/sample, and sample participants Incomplete 1.5 Participants/Sample mention of including sample selection sample and sampling selection. procedures. sample selection. procedures. Research Design Research Design documented with documented with a Research Design No research Research Design indicators of why this general recognition Incomplete 2 documented. design indicated. is an appropriate of why this is an design. appropriate design. Method of data Method of data Method of data No method of data collection & Data Collection & collection and collection and collection and Incomplete 2 analysis indicated Analysis analysis indicated and analyzing date analysis indicated. and somewhat explained thoroughly. unclear explained. Scattered random Tightly focused Somewhat focused Generally focused writing without writing summarizing summary of the Results summary of the focus on the Incomplete 2 the results of the results of the results of the study results of the study study study Analysis Directions for Provides multiple Provides a few further research Incomplete Further Research directions for further directions for are unclear or discussion of Incomplete 2.5 research. further research. inconsistent with further research. findings.
Peer Editing Rubric for the Qualitative Article Review Author of Review: Corinne Blake Peer Editor: Linda Tajima Summary 2.5 2 1.5 1 0 Total Purpose of the study Purpose of the clearly and concisely identified. Purpose of the study identified. Purpose of the study is unclear. No discussion of the purpose of the study. Incomplete 2.5 Description of Participants/Sample Thorough description of participants/sample, including sample selection. Good description of participants sample and sample selection procedures. Acceptable description of participants sample and sample selection. Little, if any, description of sample. No mention of sampling procedures. Incomplete 1.5 Research Design Research Design documented with indicators of why this is an appropriate design. Research Design documented with a general recognition of why this is an appropriate design. Research Design documented. No research design indicated. Incomplete 2 Data Collection & Analysis Method of data collection and analysis indicated and explained thoroughly. Method of data collection & analysis indicated and somewhat explained. Method of data collection and analyzing date unclear No method of data collection and analysis indicated. Incomplete 2 Results Tightly focused writing summarizing the results of the study Generally focused summary of the results of the study Somewhat focused summary of the results of the study Scattered random writing without focus on the results of the study Incomplete 2 Analysis Further Research Provides multiple directions for further research. Provides a few directions for further research. Directions for further research are unclear or inconsistent with findings. Incomplete discussion of further research. Incomplete 2.5
blakec_educ518_qualitative_article_review.docx