PI Student record review, Conduct an analysis of a SE 14 Student Provide the documents, and interview cross section of student Review and record review Department with a indicate that at least annually, records across all grade revision of IEPs description of the root on or before the anniversary levels from January 2013 to cause(s) of the Documents date of the IEP, a Team June 2013 determine why, at noncompliance, a meeting is not consistently held least annually, on or before description of the Interview to consider the student’s the anniversary date of the steps the district will progress and to review, revise, IEP, a Team meeting is not take to correct the or develop a new IEP or refer held to consider the student’s root cause(s), and the the student for a re-evaluation, progress and to review, district’s proposed as appropriate. revise, or develop a new IEP timeline for or refer the student for a implementation of as appropriate. Furthermore, record review corrective actions by and interview indicate that the November 1, 2013. district maintains a practice of Conduct a second review of issuing IEP amendments to records for students whose Submit a report of the parents or guardians for the annual review meetings were results of the second purpose of extending the held after all corrective record review. Include annual IEP. actions have been completed, the number of records to verify that at least reviewed; the number annually, on or before the of records in anniversary date of the IEP, a compliance; for Team meeting is held to records not in consider the student’s compliance, progress and to review, determine the root revise, or develop a new IEP cause(s); and the or refer the student for a specific action(s) as appropriate. taken by the district to remedy the by February 28, 2014.
SE 14 Review and revision of IEPs PI Student record review Documents Interview Student record review, documents, and interview indicate that at least annually, on or before the anniversary date of the IEP, a Team meeting is not consistently held to consider the student’s progress and to review, revise, or develop a new IEP or refer the student for a re-evaluation, as appropriate. Furthermore, record review and interview indicate that the district maintains a practice of issuing IEP amendments to parents or guardians for the purpose of extending the annual IEP. Conduct an analysis of a cross section of student records across all grade levels from January 2013 to June 2013 determine why, at least annually, on or before the anniversary date of the IEP, a Team meeting is not held to consider the student’s progress and to review, revise, or develop a new IEP or refer the student for a as appropriate. Conduct a second review of records for students whose annual review meetings were held after all corrective actions have been completed, to verify that at least annually, on or before the anniversary date of the IEP, a Team meeting is held to consider the student’s progress and to review, revise, or develop a new IEP or refer the student for a as appropriate. Provide the Department with a description of the root cause(s) of the noncompliance, a description of the steps the district will take to correct the root cause(s), and the district’s proposed timeline for implementation of corrective actions by November 1, 2013. Submit a report of the results of the second record review. Include the number of records reviewed; the number of records in compliance; for records not in compliance, determine the root cause(s); and the specific action(s) taken by the district to remedy the by February 28, 2014.
0024.docx