LRI#233: This is in person for EPI = Nell or Riki to reach out LRI#234: WBCS is not identifying isolate specifically, so use MNIR for both Many and WBCS - motion to find persuasive with mod Walter, Carmen, no further discussion, against: 0, abstain: 0, in favor: 4 – LRI#236: OBX-30 value for normal flora - Use MNIR in both occurrences in the examples - motion to find persuasive with mod Carmen, Walter, no further discussion, against: 0, abstain: 0, in favor: 4 – LRI#237: OBX-30 - Ask if the quantity is for micro only, or any quantitative test in general Riki to do – LRI#239: Handling of ID to follow similar comments - Riki to request an example for us to “organism “and add - propose in/near section 12.2.3 LRI#240: reviewed the embedded pdf - Related to Sequence Diagram in 2.6 41-42) - check with submitter, if the intent is to replace the entire section with the suggested changes in the document - unclear why the new diagram was provided twice - Riki to do LRI#998: XCN_01 and XCN_02 datatype mismatch check on LOI item where we already closed, if not – bring back Riki to do – LRI#999: Reviewing the section in the document don’t recall why we wanted to rename, but – proposed names are too restrictive, too
LRI#233: This is in person for EPI = Nell or Riki to reach out LRI#234: WBCS is not identifying isolate specifically, so use MNIR for both Many and WBCS - motion to find persuasive with mod – Walter, Carmen, no further discussion, against: 0, abstain: 0, in favor: 4 LRI#236: OBX-30 value for normal flora - Use MNIR in both occurrences in the examples - motion to find persuasive with mod – Carmen, Walter, no further discussion, against: 0, abstain: 0, in favor: 4 LRI#237: OBX-30 - Ask if the quantity is for micro only, or any quantitative test in general – Riki to do LRI#239: Handling of “organism ID to follow “and similar comments - Riki to request an example for us to add - propose in/near section 12.2.3 LRI#240: reviewed the embedded pdf - Related to Sequence Diagram in 2.6 41-42) - check with submitter, if the intent is to replace the entire section with the suggested changes in the document - unclear why the new diagram was provided twice - Riki to do LRI#998: XCN_01 and XCN_02 datatype mismatch – check on LOI item where we already closed, if not bring back – Riki to do LRI#999: Reviewing the section in the document – don’t recall why we wanted to rename, but proposed names are too restrictive, too
20170718_LabUSRealm_Notes.docx