contents, and in structure, thoughts but paper shows conclusion. clarity and lacks clarity in clear structure conclusion. reaching a and thoughts convincing with conclusion. convincing conclusion. Methodology Students are Students are Students are Students are unable to able to able to able to differentiate NT differentiate NT differentiate differentiate methodologies methodologies NT NT and unable to and formulate methodologies methodologies formulate their their own and formulate and formulate own theological methodology their own own understanding, but lack clarity theological theological and lack critical and lack critical understanding understanding evaluation with evaluation with with most with clarity, other other clarity, identify identify the methodologies. methodologies. its strengths strengths and and weaknesses of weaknesses, each method, and conversant and conversant with other with other methodologies methodologies with good with evidence. convincing evidence. Integration Students are Students are Students are Students are unable to able to able to able to integrate a integrate a integrate a integrate a selected method selected selected selected into a specific method into a method into a method into a text. specific text but specific text specific text lack clarity and with most with clarity and argument. clarity and convincing good arguments. arguments.
contents, and conclusion. in structure, clarity and conclusion. thoughts but lacks clarity in reaching a convincing conclusion. paper shows clear structure and thoughts with convincing conclusion. Methodology Students are unable to differentiate NT methodologies and unable to formulate their own theological understanding, and lack critical evaluation with other methodologies. Students are able to differentiate NT methodologies and formulate their own methodology but lack clarity and lack critical evaluation with other methodologies. Students are able to differentiate NT methodologies and formulate their own theological understanding with most clarity, identify its strengths and weaknesses, and conversant with other methodologies with good evidence. Students are able to differentiate NT methodologies and formulate own theological understanding with clarity, identify the strengths and weaknesses of each method, and conversant with other methodologies with convincing evidence. Integration Students are unable to integrate a selected method into a specific text. Students are able to integrate a selected method into a specific text but lack clarity and argument. Students are able to integrate a selected method into a specific text with most clarity and good arguments. Students are able to integrate a selected method into a specific text with clarity and convincing arguments.
2018S-TSS705-Research-Methodology-syllabus-1.docx