and whether this fear was reasonable. Looking at the overall situation and the actions of the person in question may help you determine what state of mind was. You can (his)(her) consider this kind of evidence - which is called evidence” - in “circumstantial deciding whether obtained property through the use of threat or fear. (name) You have also heard the testimony of describing (the alleged victim) state of mind - that is, how felt about giving up the (his)(her) (he)(she) property. This testimony was allowed to help you decide whether the property was obtained by fear. You should consider this testimony for that purpose only. You may also consider the relationship between and (name) (the alleged in deciding whether the element of fear exists. However, even a friendly victim) relationship between the parties does not preclude you from finding that fear exists. Comment Sand et al., supra, 50-6. 334 F.2d 678, 687 See also United States v. Provenzano, (3d Cir. 1964) (citing 309 F.2d 286 (2d Cir. 1962) (fear experienced United States v. Tolub, by the victim must be reasonable)); 451 F.2d 49, 72 (3d Cir. United States v. Addonizio, 1972) (fear may be of economic or physical harm).
and whether this fear was reasonable. Looking at the overall situation and the actions of the person in question may help you determine what (his)(her) state of mind was. You can consider this kind of evidence - which is called “circumstantial evidence” - in deciding whether (name) obtained property through the use of threat or fear. You have also heard the testimony of (the alleged victim) describing (his)(her) state of mind - that is, how (he)(she) felt about giving up the property. This testimony was allowed to help you decide whether the property was obtained by fear. You should consider this testimony for that purpose only. You may also consider the relationship between (name) and (the alleged victim) in deciding whether the element of fear exists. However, even a friendly relationship between the parties does not preclude you from finding that fear exists. Comment Sand et al., supra, 50-6. See also United States v. Provenzano, 334 F.2d 678, 687 (3d Cir. 1964) (citing United States v. Tolub, 309 F.2d 286 (2d Cir. 1962) (fear experienced by the victim must be reasonable)); United States v. Addonizio, 451 F.2d 49, 72 (3d Cir. 1972) (fear may be of economic or physical harm).
2017%20Chap%206%20HobbsAct%20revisions%20final.docx