Module Learning Outcomes: By the end of the module, you should be able to: Describe the main arguments in the culture” debate, and the interface • “compensation between insurance and tort, Analyse the interface between altruism and the normative justifications for the tort of • negligence, Reflect on the historical context of charitable immunity from tort, protective • mechanisms, and volunteer protection, Evaluate the Social Action, Responsibility, and Heroism Bill; Good Samaritan and • volunteer protection legislation; common law protective mechanisms; charitable immunity; and damages caps, Critically evaluate the legal mechanisms, and structures, used to protect non-profits, • and volunteers, from liability, and appraise their suitability for the non-profit sector, and society. Assessment Method: 25% - Moot & Skeleton 75% - Coursework - 2000 words Preliminary Reading: Peter Cane, Atiyahs Accidents, Compensation and the Law, 8th Edn, CUP, 2013
Module Learning Outcomes: By the end of the module, you should be able to: • Describe the main arguments in the “compensation culture” debate, and the interface between insurance and tort, • Analyse the interface between altruism and the normative justifications for the tort of negligence, • Reflect on the historical context of charitable immunity from tort, protective mechanisms, and volunteer protection, • Evaluate the Social Action, Responsibility, and Heroism Bill; Good Samaritan and volunteer protection legislation; common law protective mechanisms; charitable immunity; and damages caps, • Critically evaluate the legal mechanisms, and structures, used to protect non-profits, and volunteers, from liability, and appraise their suitability for the non-profit sector, and society. Assessment Method: 25% - Moot & Skeleton 75% - Coursework - 2000 words Preliminary Reading: Peter Cane, Atiyahs Accidents, Compensation and the Law, 8th Edn, CUP, 2013
Year%203%20Option%20Module%20Booklet%20-%20choices%20for%202017-18.docx