<ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_70> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_70> the approach proposed, i.e. the use of the field total issued nominal amount in the context of MiFIR / MAR reference data, be used for the assessment of the amount” under “nominal BMR Article 13(1)(i) for bonds, other forms of securitised debt and money-market instruments? If not, please suggest alternative approaches <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_71> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_71> Are you aware of any shares in companies, other securities equivalent to shares in companies, partnerships or other entities, depositary receipts in respect of shares, emission allowances for which a benchmark is used as a reference? <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_72> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_72> Do you have any suggestion for defining the assessment of the nominal amount of these financial instruments when they refer to a benchmark? <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_73> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_73> Do you agree with ESMA proposal in relation to the value of units in collective investment undertakings? If not, please explain why <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_74> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_74> Do you agree with the approach of using the notional amount, as used and defined in the EMIR reporting regime, for the assessment of notional amount of derivatives under BMR Article 13(1)(i)? If not, please suggest alternative approaches. <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_75> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_75> Which are your views on the two options proposed to assess the net asset value of investment funds? Should you have a preference for an alternative option, please provide details and explain the reasons for your preference. <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_76> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_76>
<ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_70> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_70> the approach proposed, i.e. the use of the field total issued nominal amount in the context of MiFIR / MAR reference data, be used for the assessment of the “nominal amount” under BMR Article 13(1)(i) for bonds, other forms of securitised debt and money-market instruments? If not, please suggest alternative approaches <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_71> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_71> Are you aware of any shares in companies, other securities equivalent to shares in companies, partnerships or other entities, depositary receipts in respect of shares, emission allowances for which a benchmark is used as a reference? <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_72> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_72> Do you have any suggestion for defining the assessment of the nominal amount of these financial instruments when they refer to a benchmark? <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_73> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_73> Do you agree with ESMA proposal in relation to the value of units in collective investment undertakings? If not, please explain why <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_74> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_74> Do you agree with the approach of using the notional amount, as used and defined in the EMIR reporting regime, for the assessment of notional amount of derivatives under BMR Article 13(1)(i)? If not, please suggest alternative approaches. <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_75> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_75> Which are your views on the two options proposed to assess the net asset value of investment funds? Should you have a preference for an alternative option, please provide details and explain the reasons for your preference. <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_76> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_DP_BMR_76>
2016-288_reply_form_dp_bmr.docx