Presentation For both the proposal and the presentation of the results, the resident must demonstrate to the Residency Board a thorough understanding of the topic, the methods, any shortcomings of the study and the results and conclusions supported by the project. The resident will create a poster to present at a national meeting and will also create a presentation. The prepared presentation should be 15 minutes with the remainder of the time left for questions and answers (5 minutes). Audiovisuals should be used to enhance the presentation as appropriate with handouts of the presentation provided to facilitate feedback from preceptors. Quality The resident must meet scientific standards for quality in all aspects of the project. The resident may be required to repeat any or all aspects of the project if the standards are not met. The resident will not receive a residency certificate if the project is not completed or if a final paper suitable for publication is not submitted. Suitability will be determined by the residency advisor and program director with the advice of the Residency Board. Journal Club Presentation Evaluation Form Presenter: ___________________________ Date: ______________ 1 2 3 4 5 1. REVIEW OF THE PERTINENT PRIMARY LITERATURE Identifies other recent clinical trials/studies of the same drug/procedure Primary literature is condensed and is correctly summarized Elaborates on any major attributes or deficiencies of the available data If there is a lack of literature/studies for review, this is stated 1 2 3 4 5 2. PRESENTATION OF THE ARTICLE Explains: Study Goal Methodology Results 1 2 3 4 5 3. EVALUATION OF THE ARTICLE Identifies strengths and weaknesses of the methodology of the trial/study Assesses and critiques the statistical analysis Draws own conclusions and contrasts them with authors(s) The conclusions made by the presenter about the are correct 1 2 3 4 5 4. ABILITY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS Answers are logically presented Answers are accurate Presenter can think on his/her feet (theorize if necessary) 5. DELIVERY OF PRESENTATION 1 2 3 4 5 Organization & Preparedness Is well-prepared (does not reread article) Handout is neat, organized, and logical 1 2 3 4 5 Presentation & Communication Skills Proper rate and fluency of speech Professional phraseology Smooth delivery Appropriate use of pauses
Presentation For both the proposal and the presentation of the results, the resident must demonstrate to the Residency Board a thorough understanding of the topic, the methods, any shortcomings of the study and the results and conclusions supported by the project. The resident will create a poster to present at a national meeting and will also create a presentation. The prepared presentation should be 15 minutes with the remainder of the time left for questions and answers (5 minutes). Audiovisuals should be used to enhance the presentation as appropriate with handouts of the presentation provided to facilitate feedback from preceptors. Quality The resident must meet scientific standards for quality in all aspects of the project. The resident may be required to repeat any or all aspects of the project if the standards are not met. The resident will not receive a residency certificate if the project is not completed or if a final paper suitable for publication is not submitted. Suitability will be determined by the residency advisor and program director with the advice of the Residency Board. Journal Club Presentation Evaluation Form Presenter: ___________________________ Date: ______________ 1. REVIEW OF THE PERTINENT PRIMARY LITERATURE 1 2 3 4 5 Identifies other recent clinical trials/studies of the same drug/procedure Primary literature is condensed and is correctly summarized Elaborates on any major attributes or deficiencies of the available data If there is a lack of literature/studies for review, this is stated 2. PRESENTATION OF THE ARTICLE 1 2 3 4 5 Explains: Study Goal Methodology Results 3. EVALUATION OF THE ARTICLE 1 2 3 4 5 Identifies strengths and weaknesses of the methodology of the trial/study Assesses and critiques the statistical analysis Draws own conclusions and contrasts them with authors(s) The conclusions made by the presenter about the are correct 4. ABILITY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS 1 2 3 4 5 Answers are logically presented Answers are accurate Presenter can think on his/her feet (theorize if necessary) 5. DELIVERY OF PRESENTATION Organization & Preparedness 1 2 3 4 5 Is well-prepared (does not reread article) Handout is neat, organized, and logical Presentation & Communication Skills 1 2 3 4 5 Proper rate and fluency of speech Professional phraseology Smooth delivery Appropriate use of pauses
2016-2017-PGY2_MH_Manual.docx