Inaccurate / insufficient knowledge around how the how it might be used, using nationally. Can evaluate the evidence based research? comparisons in practice quality of imaging may be a variety of clinical use of 4D with a range of Has excellent knowledge of provided. Extremely limited affected and corrected for examples. Can discuss and clinical examples and national variances in use of clinical examples to using a limited number of evaluate image quality discuss issues which may practice and can relate support discussion. Limited clinical examples. Can using a variety of clinical arise. Can critically appraise evidence based practice to knowledge around the discuss the procedure examples. Can discuss and the positioning and tattooing the departmental protocols. image quality and issues protocol and can link the evaluate patient positioning procedures for a wide Is able to competently link that may arise and the theory to how and when and tattooing, providing a variety of clinical examples, the theoretical principles of implementation of strategies tattooing should be range of clinical examples whilst also linking to 4D and utilising a broad to adapt accordingly. undertaken, alongside and linking the theoretical evidence based practice range of clinical examples Insufficient or inaccurate positioning. Refers principles to clinical nationally. Can discuss and to illustrate depth of information around the predominantly to practice. Can discuss and critically appraise the knowledge. Is able to tattooing procedure and departmental protocol with evaluate the pre-treatment pathways and critically appraise issues issues that influence a few limited examples. Is pathway from localisation to specifically the role of that may occur during positioning. No able to discuss the planning, using a range of planning within and suing a broad comparisons of practice pathway from clinical examples and links Evaluates a range of clinical examples made. Little or no reference localisation through to to theory. treatment plan and links to to demonstrate problem to the issues surrounding planning with clear links to the pre-treatment solving skills. Displays dose limiting practice and the underlying theory. processes. excellent knowledge around the adjustments that are positioning, immobilisation made. Insufficient or and tattooing, using inaccurate links made theoretical knowledge to between the pre-treatment support protocol. Is able to localisation processes and discuss and evaluate the planning. No appreciation planning process, using for the pre-treatment clinical examples to pathway and the underlying evaluate the patient theoretical principles are not pathways within discussed. Critical appraisal of a range of treatment plans. Fail: 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 Grade & Comments
Inaccurate / insufficient comparisons in practice provided. Extremely limited use of clinical examples to support discussion. Limited knowledge around the image quality and issues that may arise and the implementation of strategies to adapt accordingly. Insufficient or inaccurate information around the tattooing procedure and issues that influence positioning. No comparisons of practice made. Little or no reference to the issues surrounding dose limiting practice and the adjustments that are made. Insufficient or inaccurate links made between the pre-treatment localisation processes and planning. No appreciation for the pre-treatment pathway and the underlying theoretical principles are not discussed. knowledge around how the quality of imaging may be affected and corrected for using a limited number of clinical examples. Can discuss the procedure protocol and can link the theory to how and when tattooing should be undertaken, alongside positioning. Refers predominantly to departmental protocol with a few limited examples. Is able to discuss the pathway from localisation through to planning with clear links to the underlying theory. how it might be used, using a variety of clinical examples. Can discuss and evaluate image quality using a variety of clinical examples. Can discuss and evaluate patient positioning and tattooing, providing a range of clinical examples and linking the theoretical principles to clinical practice. Can discuss and evaluate the pre-treatment pathway from localisation to planning, using a range of clinical examples and links to theory. nationally. Can evaluate the use of 4D with a range of clinical examples and discuss issues which may arise. Can critically appraise the positioning and tattooing procedures for a wide variety of clinical examples, whilst also linking to evidence based practice nationally. Can discuss and critically appraise the pathways and specifically the role of planning within Evaluates a treatment plan and links to the pre-treatment processes. evidence based research? Has excellent knowledge of national variances in practice and can relate evidence based practice to the departmental protocols. Is able to competently link the theoretical principles of 4D and utilising a broad range of clinical examples to illustrate depth of knowledge. Is able to critically appraise issues that may occur during and suing a broad range of clinical examples to demonstrate problem solving skills. Displays excellent knowledge around positioning, immobilisation and tattooing, using theoretical knowledge to support protocol. Is able to discuss and evaluate the planning process, using clinical examples to evaluate the patient pathways within Critical appraisal of a range of treatment plans. Fail: 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 Grade & Comments
201808NewClinicalAssessorTrainingGuidance.docx