5. Increase percentage of student performance Increase % of student K-2nd- MI Grade level MI Here are the results on IP in math/algebra at every grade level. (S) performance for our teachers, the Math inventory (Based on CCRPI ES-MS Math & HS Algebra Kindergarteners on the MI from 3rd-5th Susan test for grades 1 and 2 Scores) 79% proficient and advanced grades- MI Hallmark, formative and the CCRPI Increase % of student and CCRPI Brad Cohen percentage of growth performance for our first graders math EIP from 2016 to 2017 in on the MI from 81.8% proficient Proficient teachers grades 3rd-5th: and advanced and after units, MI scores and advanced 1st grade: scores school flexible from fall- 64.6% to Increase % of student performance for our second tutors math and spring- 79.8% graders on the CCRPI from 87% on reading 2nd grade MI scores level 2-4 groups, from fall- 56.2% to Increase % of student spring- 79.8% 3rd Grade CCRPI math performance for our fourth score 2016- 89.35t% graders on the CCRPI from 92.6% and 2017- 87.06% on levels 2-4 a 4th grade- CCRI math Increase % of student scores 2016- 89.7% – performance for our fifth graders and 2017- 92.66% on the CCRPI from 88.0% on levels 5th grade CCRPI math 2-4 scores 2016- 74.6% and 2017- 88.64% All data that Each Resources Our RTI has run very 6. Increase number of students academically Meet with grade levels for RTI is collected teacher that have smoothly and of the completing every grade.(S) about RTI2 and utilize it based on the who is some students we referred strategies taking the strategies through the process, Select effective strategies for our students each month. RTI data to use only 3 were found on RTI with our ineligible for Special RTI Education services. As students far as our retention trends, Year before last we had 21 students who were up for possible retention and this year past year we had 13, so the number of students not meeting standards dropped significantly.
5. Increase percentage of student performance in math/algebra at every grade level. (S) (Based on CCRPI ES-MS Math & HS Algebra Scores) Increase % of student performance for our Kindergarteners on the MI from 79% proficient and advanced Increase % of student performance for our first graders on the MI from 81.8% proficient and advanced Increase % of student performance for our second graders on the CCRPI from 87% on level 2-4 Increase % of student performance for our fourth graders on the CCRPI from 92.6% on levels 2-4 a Increase % of student performance for our fifth graders on the CCRPI from 88.0% on levels 2-4 K-2nd- MI 3rd-5th grades- MI and CCRPI math Proficient and advanced scores Grade level teachers, Susan Hallmark, Brad Cohen EIP teachers and after school tutors MI formative units, flexible math and reading groups, Here are the results on the Math inventory test for grades 1 and 2 and the CCRPI percentage of growth from 2016 to 2017 in grades 3rd-5th: 1st grade: MI scores from fall- 64.6% to spring- 79.8% 2nd grade MI scores from fall- 56.2% to spring- 79.8% 3rd Grade CCRPI math score 2016- 89.35t% and 2017- 87.06% 4th grade- CCRI math scores – 2016- 89.7% and 2017- 92.66% 5th grade CCRPI math scores 2016- 74.6% and 2017- 88.64% IP 6. Increase number of students academically completing every grade.(S) Meet with grade levels for RTI about RTI2 and utilize it Select effective strategies for our students on RTI All data that is collected based on the strategies each month. Each teacher who is taking the RTI data Resources that have some strategies to use with our RTI students Our RTI has run very smoothly and of the students we referred through the process, only 3 were found ineligible for Special Education services. As far as our retention trends, Year before last we had 21 students who were up for possible retention and this year past year we had 13, so the number of students not meeting standards dropped significantly.
2018%20Strategic%20Planning%20Template%20-%20all%20levels.docx