Table 2 has been developed to assist the tutors in the marking criteria required for level 4 and level 5 outcomes. This should be considered in relation to the definitive module records, as this table will define the generic marking criteria for each module Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Outstanding Comprehensive coverage Consistently logical and Original logical, 86-100% of relevant issues. critical analysis though analysis and critique. Extremely well informed out. Comparing and knowledge base relevant Exemplary linkage of contrasting the to assignment. underpinning knowledge between UPK, Very clearly written, to application. application and logically structured and Demonstrates consistent associated theory. presented. independent thought on Absolute clarity of Critical discussion of relevant issues. original thought, current issues and their Incorporates evidence of backed up by valid up influence on practice. rationalised, safe, to date references to Excellent application of practice. peer reviewed papers. underpinning knowledge. Consistent application of exemplary techniques, relevant to the level of safety required for that task. Excellent Thorough coverage of Well-argued presentation Full critique showing 70-85% relevant issues. and critical analysis clear analytical skills, Well informed knowledge throughout. and up to date base relevant to Identifies and discusses referencing from peer assignment. relevant underpinning reviewed sources. Clearly written, logically knowledge and its Evidence of a structured and presented. application. knowledge base that Discussion of current Evidence of independent is fully complete that issues and influence thought, clearly allows appropriate on practice. expressed. analysis of navigational
Table 2 has been developed to assist the tutors in the marking criteria required for level 4 and level 5 outcomes. This should be considered in relation to the definitive module records, as this table will define the generic marking criteria for each module Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Outstanding 86-100% Comprehensive coverage of relevant issues. Extremely well informed knowledge base relevant to assignment. Very clearly written, logically structured and presented. Critical discussion of current issues and their influence on practice. Excellent application of underpinning knowledge. Consistent application of exemplary techniques, relevant to the level of safety required for that task. Consistently logical and critical analysis though out. Exemplary linkage of underpinning knowledge to application. Demonstrates consistent independent thought on relevant issues. Incorporates evidence of rationalised, safe, practice. Original logical, analysis and critique. Comparing and contrasting the between UPK, application and associated theory. Absolute clarity of original thought, backed up by valid up to date references to peer reviewed papers. Excellent 70-85% Thorough coverage of relevant issues. Well informed knowledge base relevant to assignment. Clearly written, logically structured and presented. Discussion of current issues and influence on practice. Well-argued presentation and critical analysis throughout. Identifies and discusses relevant underpinning knowledge and its application. Evidence of independent thought, clearly expressed. Full critique showing clear analytical skills, and up to date referencing from peer reviewed sources. Evidence of a knowledge base that is fully complete that allows appropriate analysis of navigational
BSc_Navigation_and_Maritime_Science_programme_specification_4493.docx