Section C1: Delivery Sub-Group (DSG) Recommendations 16th July 2018 / 6th August 2018 DSG Date DSG Summary Dave Addison presented slides 31 to 46, talking through the summary & recommendation. This has been talked through at DSG many times. DSG Discussion: Do we need to take account of this (and change UNC)? Some thoughts: This will make the Mandatory Meter Reading field optional in UMR / UBR / UDR and responses • Only had one response that indicated of portfolio of 150, only 1 was calling U+C only. • Do we build to a UNC compliant solution only? • 06/08/18 discussed with regards to the validation only being applied at the annual process e.g. Check – read process. DSG agreed that the meter and convertor index validation should not be applied to standard Shipper User to CDSP meter reading files. Capture Document / INSERT Requirements DSG Recommendation Defer DSG Recommended TBC Release Section D: DSC Change Proposal High Solution Options
Section C1: Delivery Sub-Group (DSG) Recommendations DSG Date 16th July 2018 / 6th August 2018 DSG Summary Dave Addison presented slides 31 to 46, talking through the summary & recommendation. This has been talked through at DSG many times. DSG Discussion: Do we need to take account of this (and change UNC)? Some thoughts: • This will make the Mandatory Meter Reading field optional in UMR / UBR / UDR and responses • Only had one response that indicated of portfolio of 150, only 1 was calling U+C only. • Do we build to a UNC compliant solution only? 06/08/18 – discussed with regards to the validation only being applied at the annual process e.g. Check read process. DSG agreed that the meter and convertor index validation should not be applied to standard Shipper User to CDSP meter reading files. Capture Document / Requirements INSERT DSG Recommendation Defer DSG Recommended Release TBC Section D: DSC Change Proposal High Solution Options
XRN4621%20V3.docx