Mr. Solomon stated Ms. Ross is getting a divorce and she needs to be able to support her daughter, she can’t do it working as a waitress, her alimony is about done. Father stated maybe he should do some fracking on his property and search for oil. Ms. Ross stated that the property would remain in the family. Ms. Lengel stated you can’t guarantee that. The BZA would not ask for that guarantee. Ms. Sharp-Gates closes the general discussing. Ms. Gazley motioned and Ms. Lengel seconded to grant the variance. FINDING OF FACTS: The Board reviewed the facts in regard to the appeal: a. The variance requested stems from a condition which is unique to the property at issue and not ordinarily found in the same zone or district. There is no unique condition.. b. The hardship condition is not created by actions of the applicant. There is no hardship. c. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the rights of adjacent owners. It would be completely against zoning. d. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare. It would be adverse to the public; residential should be residential. e. The variance will be consistent with the general spirit and intent of the zoning resolution. No it would not. f. The variance sought is the minimum which will afford relief to the applicant. No reason. Ms. Sharp-Gates closes the board discussion and asks for a roll call: Ms. Gazley No, Ms. Preston No, Ms. Lengel No, Mr. Hill No, Ms. Sharp-Gates No. ADJOURNMENT: Ms. Lengel motioned to adjourn, Ms. Preston seconded, the motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9: 25 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, ________________________ __________________________ Jan Helt Date Lucinda Date Secretary, BZA Chairman, BZA
Mr. Solomon stated Ms. Ross is getting a divorce and she needs to be able to support her daughter, she can’t do it working as a waitress, her alimony is about done. Father stated maybe he should do some fracking on his property and search for oil. Ms. Ross stated that the property would remain in the family. Ms. Lengel stated you can’t guarantee that. The BZA would not ask for that guarantee. Ms. Sharp-Gates closes the general discussing. Ms. Gazley motioned and Ms. Lengel seconded to grant the variance. FINDING OF FACTS: The Board reviewed the facts in regard to the appeal: a. The variance requested stems from a condition which is unique to the property at issue and not ordinarily found in the same zone or district. There is no unique condition.. b. The hardship condition is not created by actions of the applicant. There is no hardship. c. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the rights of adjacent owners. It would be completely against zoning. d. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare. It would be adverse to the public; residential should be residential. e. The variance will be consistent with the general spirit and intent of the zoning resolution. No it would not. f. The variance sought is the minimum which will afford relief to the applicant. No reason. Ms. Sharp-Gates closes the board discussion and asks for a roll call: Ms. Gazley No, Ms. Preston No, Ms. Lengel No, Mr. Hill No, Ms. Sharp-Gates No. ADJOURNMENT: Ms. Lengel motioned to adjourn, Ms. Preston seconded, the motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9: 25 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, ________________________ __________________________ Jan Helt Date Lucinda Date Secretary, BZA Chairman, BZA
BOARD%20OF%20ZONING%20APPEALS%20%20March%2014,%20%202017,%202017.docx