3. a process by which either party may raise issues related to potential conflicts of interest of such individuals iv. the persons who may attend and/or participate in the adjudication process and the extent of that participation. b. Outline the rights and roles of both parties in the adjudication process, including: i. notice of hearing(s) to both parties; ii. an opportunity for both parties to present witnesses and other evidence, including: 1. a description of the types of evidence that may or may not be presented, including but not limited to: a. prohibiting questioning or evidence about the complainant’s prior sexual conduct with anyone other than the alleged perpetrator b. clarifying that evidence of a prior consensual dating or sexual relationship between the parties by itself does not imply consent or preclude a finding of Sexual Misconduct 2. if the institution conducts a hearing, and generally allows for cross-examination, a description of alternative methods that preclude the respondent from personally the complainant iii. extension of any other rights given to the alleged perpetrator to the complainant. c. Explain the possible results of the adjudication process, including i. sanctions; ii. remedies/accommodations for the complainant; iii. additional remedies for the institution community. d. Outline how the parties will be informed of the results of the adjudication, including: i. simultaneous written notice to both parties of the outcome of the complaint and the option to appeal, if applicable;
3. a process by which either party may raise issues related to potential conflicts of interest of such individuals iv. the persons who may attend and/or participate in the adjudication process and the extent of that participation. b. Outline the rights and roles of both parties in the adjudication process, including: i. notice of hearing(s) to both parties; ii. an opportunity for both parties to present witnesses and other evidence, including: 1. a description of the types of evidence that may or may not be presented, including but not limited to: a. prohibiting questioning or evidence about the complainant’s prior sexual conduct with anyone other than the alleged perpetrator b. clarifying that evidence of a prior consensual dating or sexual relationship between the parties by itself does not imply consent or preclude a finding of Sexual Misconduct 2. if the institution conducts a hearing, and generally allows for cross-examination, a description of alternative methods that preclude the respondent from personally the complainant iii. extension of any other rights given to the alleged perpetrator to the complainant. c. Explain the possible results of the adjudication process, including i. sanctions; ii. remedies/accommodations for the complainant; iii. additional remedies for the institution community. d. Outline how the parties will be informed of the results of the adjudication, including: i. simultaneous written notice to both parties of the outcome of the complaint and the option to appeal, if applicable;
BORSexualMisconductPolicyAct172FINALAugust24.docx