Requires a maximum $500 deposit the local board. as prescribed by Must be in writing. Should clearly state the bases for challenge. A respondent’s bases for appeal are limited to: misapplication of Articles of Code misinterpretation of Articles of Code procedural deficiency lack of procedural due process nature/extent of discipline imposed A complainant’s basis for appeal is limited to alleged procedural deficiency or other lack of due process that may have deprived him/her of opportunity for fair hearing. During the initial administrative review process: president or delegate reviews appeal within ten (10) days after the appeal was transmitted to the board it is determined whether appeal states any legitimate basis for appeal (if not, problem should be explained to party, and additional detail is requested) all appeals are heard and there may be no “veto” Appeal request is reviewed by the board of directors, a panel of the board of directors, or the executive committee, if so designated by board of directors, no later than thirty (30) days after the date of receipt of the appeal. During the appeal hearing: the petitioner is limited only to those bases set forth in written request for appeal the hearing chair presents the transcript of or summarizes the case each party may offer corrections to the transcript or summary each party may present arguments about why the hearing panel’s decision should or should not be followed no new evidence is allowed, except that which bears upon the claim of deprivation of due process arguments are limited to the issues raised in the written appeal request
Requires a maximum $500 deposit as prescribed by the local board. Must be in writing. Should clearly state the bases for challenge. A respondent’s bases for appeal are limited to: misapplication of Articles of Code misinterpretation of Articles of Code procedural deficiency lack of procedural due process nature/extent of discipline imposed A complainant’s basis for appeal is limited to alleged procedural deficiency or other lack of due process that may have deprived him/her of opportunity for fair hearing. During the initial administrative review process: president or delegate reviews appeal within ten (10) days after the appeal was transmitted to the board it is determined whether appeal states any legitimate basis for appeal (if not, problem should be explained to party, and additional detail is requested) all appeals are heard and there may be no “veto” Appeal request is reviewed by the board of directors, a panel of the board of directors, or the executive committee, if so designated by board of directors, no later than thirty (30) days after the date of receipt of the appeal. During the appeal hearing: the petitioner is limited only to those bases set forth in written request for appeal the hearing chair presents the transcript of or summarizes the case each party may offer corrections to the transcript or summary each party may present arguments about why the hearing panel’s decision should or should not be followed no new evidence is allowed, except that which bears upon the claim of deprivation of due process arguments are limited to the issues raised in the written appeal request
2017%20Participant%20Guide.docx