10 Number of Chart MS Number of operational sites Aggregation on the basis of Yes operational in relation to the population the water body information sites in density of the Member State; reported at monitoring site relation to the population density is used as level. population an indicator of the amount of density of the potential pressure from Member human activity. State 11 Percentage of Chart MS Percentage of surface water Aggregation on the basis of Yes surface water bodies included in the water body information bodies operational monitoring in reported at monitoring site included in which phytoplankton, other level. operational aquatic flora, monitoring in macroinvertebrates and fish which each are monitored. biological quality element is measured 12 Percentage of Chart MS Percentage of surface water Aggregation on the basis of Yes surface water bodies classified for chemical information reported at bodies status compared to the water body and monitoring monitored percentage of water bodies site levels. and classified monitored for Priority (on the basis Substances. of monitoring or extrapolation) for chemical status 13 Percentage of Chart MS Percentage of surface water Aggregation on the basis of It was not surface water bodies in which each Priority information reported at possible to bodies in Substance is monitored. water body and monitoring produce which each site levels. (reporting Priority of individual Substance is priority monitored substances was optional; in addition in many cases information was not available in RBMP or background documents; generally very poor reporting of chemical status reflecting gaps) 14 Number of Chart Number of monitoring sites Aggregation on the basis of No surface water or per Priority Substance the water body information monitoring table differentiating matrix and reported at monitoring site sites per purpose (status and trend). level. Priority Substance
10 Number of operational sites in relation to the population density of the Member State Chart MS Number of operational sites in relation to the population density of the Member State; population density is used as an indicator of the amount of potential pressure from human activity. Aggregation on the basis of the water body information reported at monitoring site level. Yes 11 Percentage of surface water bodies included in operational monitoring in which each biological quality element is measured Chart MS Percentage of surface water bodies included in operational monitoring in which phytoplankton, other aquatic flora, macroinvertebrates and fish are monitored. Aggregation on the basis of the water body information reported at monitoring site level. Yes 12 Percentage of surface water bodies monitored and classified (on the basis of monitoring or extrapolation) for chemical status Chart MS Percentage of surface water bodies classified for chemical status compared to the percentage of water bodies monitored for Priority Substances. Aggregation on the basis of information reported at water body and monitoring site levels. Yes 13 Percentage of surface water bodies in which each Priority Substance is monitored Chart MS Percentage of surface water bodies in which each Priority Substance is monitored. Aggregation on the basis of information reported at water body and monitoring site levels. It was not possible to produce (reporting of individual priority substances was optional; in addition in many cases information was not available in RBMP or background documents; generally very poor reporting of chemical status reflecting gaps) 14 Number of surface water monitoring sites per Priority Substance Chart or table Number of monitoring sites per Priority Substance differentiating matrix and purpose (status and trend). Aggregation on the basis of the water body information reported at monitoring site level. No
WFD_ReportingGuidance.docx