FIGURES FIGURE 1 IN (RIGHT) THE CONFIGURATION CARBON CHAINS ON THE TWO SIDES OF THE DOUBLE BOND CIS IN (LEFT), BEND TOWARDS EACH OTHER. THE RARER CONFIGURATION THE CARBON CHAIN IS ALMOST TRANS 12 STRAIGHT FIGURE 2 ESTIMATED MEAN DIETARY INTAKES TOTAL TFA AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND 16 OF IN AND FIGURE 3 ESTIMATED DIETARY INTAKES: 5% 95% 16 AND PERCENTILE COMPARED TO MEAN FIGURE 4 MAJOR TFA CONTRIBUTING FOOD GROUPS TO TOTAL INTAKES FOR DIFFERENT POPULATION AUSTRALIA 17 GROUPS: FIGURE 5 MAJOR TFA CONTRIBUTING FOOD GROUPS TO TOTAL INTAKES FOR DIFFERENT POPULATION NEW ZEALAND 17 GROUPS: FIGURE 6 MAJOR TFA CONTRIBUTING FOOD GROUPS TO TOTAL INTAKES FOR DIFFERENT POPULATION NEW ZEALAND MAORI PACIFIC ISLANDERS 18 GROUPS: AND FIGURE 7 CONTRIBUTION TFA TAKE AWAY 18 OF INTAKE FROM FOODS CLASSIFIED AS FOODS FIGURE 8 CONTRIBUTION TFA FOOD LABEL 19 OF INTAKE FROM FOODS CLASSIFIED AS DISPLAYING A FIGURE 9 COMPARISON OF MEAN DIETARY INTAKES OF ENERGY FROM FATS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE AMDR 23 RECOMMENDATION FIGURE 10 PERCENTAGE TFA 23 TOTAL ENERGY INTAKE PER DAY FROM TABLES TABLE 2A ESTIMATED TFA AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND AUSTRALIA: SUMMARY INTAKES OF IN AND OF TFA 24 ESTIMATED DIETARY INTAKES OF 2B ESTIMATED TFA AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND AUSTRALIA: DATA INTAKES OF IN AND SOURCES TFA 25 FOR ESTIMATES OF INTAKES TABLE 3 RESULTS 2002-2003 33 FROM ONGOING LABEL MONITORING SURVEY FOR 4 APPROACHES 41 FOR RISK MANAGEMENT
FIGURES FIGURE 1 IN THE CIS CONFIGURATION (RIGHT) CARBON CHAINS ON THE TWO SIDES OF THE DOUBLE BOND BEND TOWARDS EACH OTHER. IN THE RARER TRANS CONFIGURATION (LEFT), THE CARBON CHAIN IS ALMOST STRAIGHT 12 FIGURE 2 ESTIMATED MEAN DIETARY INTAKES OF TOTAL TFA IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND 16 FIGURE 3 ESTIMATED DIETARY INTAKES: 5% AND 95% PERCENTILE COMPARED TO MEAN 16 FIGURE 4 MAJOR CONTRIBUTING FOOD GROUPS TO TOTAL TFA INTAKES FOR DIFFERENT POPULATION GROUPS: AUSTRALIA 17 FIGURE 5 MAJOR CONTRIBUTING FOOD GROUPS TO TOTAL TFA INTAKES FOR DIFFERENT POPULATION GROUPS: NEW ZEALAND 17 FIGURE 6 MAJOR CONTRIBUTING FOOD GROUPS TO TOTAL TFA INTAKES FOR DIFFERENT POPULATION GROUPS: NEW ZEALAND MAORI AND PACIFIC ISLANDERS 18 FIGURE 7 CONTRIBUTION OF TFA INTAKE FROM FOODS CLASSIFIED AS TAKE AWAY FOODS 18 FIGURE 8 CONTRIBUTION OF TFA INTAKE FROM FOODS CLASSIFIED AS DISPLAYING A FOOD LABEL 19 FIGURE 9 COMPARISON OF MEAN DIETARY INTAKES OF ENERGY FROM FATS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE AMDR RECOMMENDATION 23 FIGURE 10 PERCENTAGE TOTAL ENERGY INTAKE PER DAY FROM TFA 23 TABLES TABLE 2A ESTIMATED INTAKES OF TFA IN AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA: SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED DIETARY INTAKES OF TFA 24 2B ESTIMATED INTAKES OF TFA IN AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND AND AUSTRALIA: DATA SOURCES FOR ESTIMATES OF TFA INTAKES 25 TABLE 3 RESULTS FROM ONGOING LABEL MONITORING SURVEY FOR 2002-2003 33 4 APPROACHES FOR RISK MANAGEMENT 41
Transfat%20report%202007.docx