Step 2 .12 .10 .01 2, 109 .58 Average vs. Control -0.20 0.07 -0.69 .00 Contrast (ACC) Average vs. Thin -0.28 -0.10 -0.95 .01 Contrast (ATC) Step 3 .12 .09 .00 1, 108 .02 Internalisation 0.49 0.30 2.12* .03 . Step 4 .19 .14 .07 2,106 4.49** ACC x -0.65 -0.20 -1.74 .02 Internalisation ATC x -.1.00 -.36 -2.95** .07 Internalisation Note. Reported are from the final model. b, t, sr2 β, *p<.05. **p<.01. ***p<.001. Simple slopes analyses demonstrating the moderating impact of internalisation of Figure 1. cultural beauty ideals on the effect of model body size on body image state. women’s Simple slopes analyses demonstrating the moderating impact of internalisation of Figure 2. cultural beauty ideals on the effect of model body size on body image state. men’s
Step 2 Average vs. Control Contrast (ACC) -0.20 0.07 -0.69 .00 .12 .10 .01 2, 109 .58 Average vs. Thin Contrast (ATC) -0.28 -0.10 -0.95 .01 Step 3 Internalisation 0.49 0.30 2.12* .03 .12 .09 .00 . 1, 108 .02 Step 4 ACC x Internalisation ATC x Internalisation -0.65 -.1.00 -0.20 -.36 -1.74 -2.95** .02 .07 .19 .14 .07 2,106 4.49** *p<.05. **p<.01. ***p<.001. Note. Reported b, β, t, sr2 are from the final model. Figure 1. Simple slopes analyses demonstrating the moderating impact of internalisation of cultural beauty ideals on the effect of model body size on women’s body image state. Figure 2. Simple slopes analyses demonstrating the moderating impact of internalisation of cultural beauty ideals on the effect of model body size on men’s body image state.
Waif%20Goodbye%20%20author%20info%20final%20revision.docx