I. Proposals of recommendations addressing specific existent institutions/processes/fora Richard Hill, APIG It is proposed to recommend that ICANN provide to all governments the same treatment that it has given to the USA. It is proposed to recommend that ICANN exchange letters with any country that so requests, stating that it will not take any action to re-delegate the first country’s ccTLD without obtaining express written approval from the government of the country in question. It is proposed to recommend that ICANN delegate to any country that so requests up to three additional ccTLDs, with names of the is the two-letter country form “ccXYZ”, where “cc” code, and are strings chosen by the or “XYZ” country, for example “gov”, “mil”, “edu”, country code (which it is not), the corresponding “01”, “02”, “03”. Thus, if “rt” were a valid country could request delegation of or “rtgov” “rt01”m etc. Richard Hill, APIG 2. Since the right of the public to correspond by telecommunications is guaranteed by Article 33 of the ITU Constitution (within the limits outlined in Article 34), it is proposed to
I. Proposals of recommendations addressing specific existent institutions/processes/fora Richard Hill, APIG It is proposed to recommend that ICANN provide to all governments the same treatment that it has given to the USA. It is proposed to recommend that ICANN exchange letters with any country that so requests, stating that it will not take any action to re-delegate the country’s ccTLD without first obtaining express written approval from the government of the country in question. It is proposed to recommend that ICANN delegate to any country that so requests up to three additional ccTLDs, with names of the form “ccXYZ”, where “cc” is the two-letter country code, and “XYZ” are strings chosen by the country, for example “gov”, “mil”, “edu”, or “01”, “02”, “03”. Thus, if “rt” were a valid country code (which it is not), the corresponding country could request delegation of “rtgov” or “rt01”m etc. Richard Hill, APIG 2. Since the right of the public to correspond by telecommunications is guaranteed by Article 33 of the ITU Constitution (within the limits outlined in Article 34), it is proposed to
WGEC2016_m2_CompilationRecommendations_en.docx