TRAC Report Trusted Repository Audit and Certification methodology, 2007 • OCLC, DPC, and NARA • Restructured and adopted in Oct. 2009 as CCSDS Recommended Practice • (Red Book) Nests with OAIS Framework • Widely recognized in archival and library communities • CCSDS Red Book Audit and certification criteria for measuring of a digital • “trustworthiness” repository Lists criteria and evidence needed to support the criteria • Assumes an external certification process which does not exist now • Can be used as a self-assessment guide • DRAMBORA Repository Audit Methodology Based on 2007 • “Digital Risk Analysis,” Feb. Digital Conservation Centre (DCC) and DigitalPreservationEurope (DPE), • Proposes a methodological framework, guidelines and audit tools to support the • identification, assessment and management of risks in a digital repository Self-assessment checklist, no certification at this time • Integrates with OAIS framework • Challenges of for promoting trusted repositories • No integrated “community practice” CCDSC Red Book and DRAMBORA are not widely known in the scientific, IT, • and data management communities They do not address design of data systems and data management, e.g. • systems planning, funding, system requirements No Case Studies and Lessons Learned • 7. USGS Scientific Information Management Workshop Vocabulary From Tom Gunther and Dave Govoni, USGS, 2006.
TRAC Report • Trusted Repository Audit and Certification methodology, 2007 • OCLC, DPC, and NARA • Restructured and adopted in Oct. 2009 as CCSDS Recommended Practice (Red Book) • Nests with OAIS Framework • Widely recognized in archival and library communities CCSDS Red Book • Audit and certification criteria for measuring “trustworthiness” of a digital repository • Lists criteria and evidence needed to support the criteria • Assumes an external certification process which does not exist now • Can be used as a self-assessment guide DRAMBORA • “Digital Repository Audit Methodology Based on Risk Analysis,” Feb. 2007 • Digital Conservation Centre (DCC) and DigitalPreservationEurope (DPE), • Proposes a methodological framework, guidelines and audit tools to support the identification, assessment and management of risks in a digital repository • Self-assessment checklist, no certification at this time • Integrates with OAIS framework Challenges • No integrated “community of practice” for promoting trusted repositories • CCDSC Red Book and DRAMBORA are not widely known in the scientific, IT, and data management communities • They do not address design of data systems and data management, e.g. systems planning, funding, system requirements • No Case Studies and Lessons Learned 7. USGS Scientific Information Management Workshop Vocabulary From Tom Gunther and Dave Govoni, USGS, 2006.
WGISS_DSIG_Data-Lifecycle-Models-And-Concepts-v13-1_Apr2012.docx