Rating 1 2 3 Score → Indicator Indicator Not Met Indicator Partially Indicator Met ↓ Met Alignment with Content and Some of the Each of the Learning methods of learning objectives learning objectives Objectives and assessment lack are assessed is assessed with Instruction congruence with through the fidelity and learning objectives assessment plan, integrity through and lack cognitive but more than half the assessment complexity. are congruent with plan. Assessments Assessments do not learning objectives are congruent with align with clear are aligned and the learning local, state, and have integrity with objectives in national standards. content and content and cognitive cognitive complexity. The complexity. assessments show integrity with objectives and standards. Description and Description and Description and Assessment Plan narrative regarding narrative regarding narrative regarding GP 4 the assessment plan the assessment plan the assessment plan does not address provides limited thoroughly DP 3 questions regarding attention to addresses questions DP 5 the plan’s design, addressing regarding the including records questions regarding plan’s design, of individual the plan’s design, including records progress, and how including records of individual assessments reflect of individual progress, and how a respect for progress, and how assessments reflect student diversity. assessments reflect a respect for a respect for student diversity. student diversity. Clarity of The assessments Assessment criteria Assessment criteria Criteria and contain no clear have been are clear and are Standards for criteria for developed, but explicitly linked to Performance measuring student more than half are 90% of the learning performance clear or explicitly objectives. relative to the linked to the GP 4 learning objectives. learning objectives and standards.
Rating → Indicator ↓ 1 Indicator Not Met 2 Indicator Partially Met 3 Indicator Met Score Alignment with Learning Objectives and Instruction Content and methods of assessment lack congruence with learning objectives and lack cognitive complexity. Assessments do not align with clear local, state, and national standards. Some of the learning objectives are assessed through the assessment plan, but more than half are congruent with learning objectives are aligned and have integrity with content and cognitive complexity. The assessments show integrity with objectives and standards. Each of the learning objectives is assessed with fidelity and integrity through the assessment plan. Assessments are congruent with the learning objectives in content and cognitive complexity. Assessment Plan GP 4 DP 3 DP 5 Description and narrative regarding the assessment plan does not address questions regarding the plan’s design, including records of individual progress, and how assessments reflect a respect for student diversity. Description and narrative regarding the assessment plan provides limited attention to addressing questions regarding the plan’s design, including records of individual progress, and how assessments reflect a respect for student diversity. Description and narrative regarding the assessment plan thoroughly addresses questions regarding the plan’s design, including records of individual progress, and how assessments reflect a respect for student diversity. Clarity of Criteria and Standards for Performance GP 4 The assessments contain no clear criteria for measuring student performance relative to the learning objectives. Assessment criteria have been developed, but more than half are clear or explicitly linked to the learning objectives and standards. Assessment criteria are clear and are explicitly linked to 90% of the learning objectives.
tws-rubrics-for-secondary-revised-summer-2013.docx