Earned Presentation 3 Points 2 Points 1 Point 0 Points Points delivery Connections Clear connections made New and connections Limited, if any No connections made between maps, research made, but lack of connections, and vague and off topic; not a lot questions, and graphs. supporting explanations or generalities made in of thought provided in Original answers with detail provided in comparing maps, answering question and /3 supporting explanations, comparing maps, research research questions and lacking suggestions. and details made in questions and graphs and graphs. Vague suggestions. providing suggestions. suggestions. Visuals Excellent visuals tell Very good visuals. 0 or Visuals are mediocre Few or confusing story on their own. Eye- few mechanical errors. quality. A few visuals, too much text pleasing. One message Visuals explained well, mechanical errors. on slides. More than 3 per slide. Explained very though axes / labels not Complement talk, but not mechanical errors. /3 well (axes, labels, trends, always explained. explained well or put in Visuals distract from etc). context. talk. Visuals not explained. Format of Within 5% of allotted Within 10% of allotted Within 15% of allotted Length is more than delivery time. Conveys the time. what” is there time. Explains the 20% too long or too “so “So what” in just a few but may take a moment to but not the short. Does not explain “what” “so /3 seconds. Very helpful see. Respectful in what.” Somewhat the or the “what” “so and respectful in suggestions. respectful in suggestions. what.” Disrespectful in suggestions. suggestions. Points /9 Task 2 Points 0 Points Earned Points Post-module quiz Completed Did not complete /2 Reflection questions Completed Did not complete /2 Total Points /4
Presentation delivery 3 Points 2 Points 1 Point 0 Points Earned Points Connections Clear connections made between maps, research questions, and graphs. Original answers with supporting explanations, and details made in suggestions. New and connections made, but lack of supporting explanations or detail provided in comparing maps, research questions and graphs and providing suggestions. Limited, if any connections, and vague generalities made in comparing maps, research questions and graphs. Vague suggestions. No connections made and off topic; not a lot of thought provided in answering question and lacking suggestions. /3 Visuals Excellent visuals tell story on their own. Eye- pleasing. One message per slide. Explained very well (axes, labels, trends, etc). Very good visuals. 0 or few mechanical errors. Visuals explained well, though axes / labels not always explained. Visuals are mediocre quality. A few mechanical errors. Complement talk, but not explained well or put in context. Few or confusing visuals, too much text on slides. More than 3 mechanical errors. Visuals distract from talk. Visuals not explained. /3 Format of delivery Within 5% of allotted time. Conveys the “so what” in just a few seconds. Very helpful and respectful in suggestions. Within 10% of allotted time. “So what” is there but may take a moment to see. Respectful in suggestions. Within 15% of allotted time. Explains the “what” but not the “so what.” Somewhat respectful in suggestions. Length is more than 20% too long or too short. Does not explain the “what” or the “so what.” Disrespectful in suggestions. /3 Points /9 Task 2 Points 0 Points Earned Points Post-module quiz Completed Did not complete /2 Reflection questions Completed Did not complete /2 Total Points /4
unit_iii_presentation_rubric_r.v7.docx