Side Box More About ARVN Chap 22. Reviewer’s Comment. Gen’l Westmoreland is OF Omitted are achievements under Abrams of Vietnam War discussed in both text and side box. There is no winning against the Tet and also winning the 1972 Years 1954-1975. mention or box about Gen’l Abrams. Abrams led Easter offensive. Omitted also is Abrams’ success in Sec 2, p.737. our forces from 1968-1972 with results replacing the failed mass attack method of The whole page, Westmoreland had never achieved. Westmoreland with the successful small-unit attacks text and side box on the north’s supply bases. re Westmoreland The conclusion of the war is not discussed in detail for another 20 pages in the text, until page 758 The information about Abrams’ success needs discussing here or around page 758 to show how the press manipulated the public on the war. Chapter 22 Ask students why land mines continue to be a B/OF Are the students prepared to connect what occurs in Page 739 problem during peace time in many places in the the future to what occurred in the past? Now and Then world. (Land mines continue to kill longer after a Land Mines war is over). Chapter 22 Low morale even led a few soldiers to murder OF This statement is not in parenthesis. It is not a quote. Page 740 their officers. What is it? Par 2 Line 5 There are no facts to back up this statement. of murdered officers? I would eliminate this. Chap 22. Vietnam was slowly claiming an early casualty: OF/B Johnson’s War on Poverty was failing already Vietnam War Johnson’s grand vision of domestic reform. without any help from Vietnam. Years 1954-1975. The largest transfer of wealth in history between Sec 2, p.741. 1965 and 1970 did not decrease the poverty rate as Para 1, Last intended. It destroyed the Black family, encouraged sentence. illegitimacy, and deprived many of pride in working. Chap 22. HT Although it is true that the media and authors called Vietnam War Vietnam a working-class war because of draft Years 1954-1975. deferrals for college and lack of a draft lottery until Sec 3, p. 742, Gen. Hershey was replaced, thousands of middle and Top Box on left upper class soldiers also fought and became casualties.
Side Box More About ARVN Chap 22. Vietnam War Years 1954-1975. Sec 2, p.737. The whole page, text and side box re Westmoreland Reviewer’s Comment. Gen’l Westmoreland is discussed in both text and side box. There is no mention or box about Gen’l Abrams. Abrams led our forces from 1968-1972 with results Westmoreland had never achieved. OF Omitted are achievements under Abrams of winning against the Tet and also winning the 1972 Easter offensive. Omitted also is Abrams’ success in replacing the failed mass attack method of Westmoreland with the successful small-unit attacks on the north’s supply bases. The conclusion of the war is not discussed in detail for another 20 pages in the text, until page 758 The information about Abrams’ success needs discussing here or around page 758 to show how the press manipulated the public on the war. Chapter 22 Page 739 Now and Then Land Mines Ask students why land mines continue to be a problem during peace time in many places in the world. (Land mines continue to kill longer after a war is over). B/OF Are the students prepared to connect what occurs in the future to what occurred in the past? Chapter 22 Page 740 Par 2 Line 5 Low morale even led a few soldiers to murder their officers. OF This statement is not in parenthesis. It is not a quote. What is it? There are no facts to back up this statement. of murdered officers? I would eliminate this. Chap 22. Vietnam War Years 1954-1975. Sec 2, p.741. Para 1, Last sentence. Vietnam was slowly claiming an early casualty: Johnson’s grand vision of domestic reform. OF/B Johnson’s War on Poverty was failing already without any help from Vietnam. The largest transfer of wealth in history between 1965 and 1970 did not decrease the poverty rate as intended. It destroyed the Black family, encouraged illegitimacy, and deprived many of pride in working. Chap 22. Vietnam War Years 1954-1975. Sec 3, p. 742, Top Box on left HT Although it is true that the media and authors called Vietnam a working-class war because of draft deferrals for college and lack of a draft lottery until Gen. Hershey was replaced, thousands of middle and upper class soldiers also fought and became casualties.
TTT-Report-to-Texas-SBOE-on-Houghton-Mifflin-US-History-Since-1877-incl-Alfonsi-Baker-feedback-edited.docx