52 the ty could already exercised at level of simply choosing be is arploy. which elanents one wishes to There likewise a scope the the for creativity in choice of perfarners or "actors'': we text know the by all that sane read ferent readers produces different effects, depending on the reader. As gards the the listening to "WOrd of God and camrunity response which should be given to this reading, we asked whether we ought to go still further, and visage new fo:onulas nearer real been life. Here and there exper.inents have already made with reading such texts.It "WOuld be a question of preparing for the precisely as a ccmnunity; of listening to this reading the together, so as to arrive at a real sharing of liturgy; to and of enabling each irrlividual express before one's the and brothers or sisters what Word Spirit might have awakened within one's deepest self. This formula for listening to the 'WOrd the and of God is daily bread of small apostolic groups, especially gocx1 thing of yO\.mgste.rs. uld it not be a to introduce this approach into our nonastic .in and nnmities, function of our possibilities, our needs, our we resources? At any rate, cannot afford to refuse the the evidence: way in which we approach the the Scriptures today is different from what it was in past -not the ly different, of course, but different at level to and of culture; this cannot fail to affect sane degree the style of our response. much b- T h e T r o p a r i o n Not will be said about the troparion in this report, since a by detailed study Fr.Jean-Eudes David of Briwill probably next appear in the issue of this Liturgy bulletin.In this the the article Autlx:>r will study literary fonn of the under troparion, particularly the aspect of play :situation of the various actors or perfonrers, diversification of roles, the articulation of mants of dialogue, conditions requisite for authenticity. Here we shall stress only the fact that, in spite of the
52 ty could already be exercised at the level of simply choosing which elanents one wishes to arploy. There is likewise a scope for creativity in the choice of the perfarners or "actors'': we all know that the sane text read by ferent readers produces different effects, depending on the reader. As gards listening to the "WOrd of God and the camrunity response which should be given to this reading, we asked whether we ought to go still further, and visage new fo:onulas nearer real life. Here and there exper.inents have already been made with such texts.It "WOuld be a question of preparing for the reading precisely as a ccmnunity; of listening to this reading together, so as to arrive at a real sharing of the liturgy; and of enabling each irrlividual to express before one's brothers or sisters what the Word and Spirit might have awakened within one's deepest self. This formula for listening to the 'WOrd of God is the daily bread of small apostolic groups, and especially of yO\.mgste.rs. uld it not be a gocx1 thing to introduce this approach into our nonastic nnmities, .in function of our possibilities, our needs, and our resources? At any rate, we cannot afford to refuse the evidence: the way in which we approach the Scriptures today is different from what it was in the past -not ly different, of course, but different at the level of culture; and this cannot fail to affect to sane degree the style of our response. b- T h e T r o p a r i o n Not much will be said about the troparion in this report, since a detailed study by Fr.Jean-Eudes David of Briwill probably appear in the next issue of this Liturgy bulletin.In this article the Autlx:>r will study the literary fonn of the troparion, particularly under the aspect of play :situation of the various actors or perfonrers, diversification of roles, articulation of the mants of dialogue, conditions requisite for authenticity. Here we shall stress only the fact that, in spite of the
Volume06Number01.docx