Brief description of the groupwork: STRUCTURE There are three analytical dimensions (A, B, C). These are to structure and guide the group discussions. Each group will discuss what type(s) of HWF mobility to monitor, with what objective (A), what kind of indicators to consider for that (B), and how to collect data for those indicators (C). (Table 1) Possible indicators to focus according to three defined HWF mobility challenge areas are listed in Table 2 separately. There are three groups (1,2,3). Each group has a defined HWF mobility challenge area the group members focus on: training mobility (Group 1), reliance on foreign HWF (Group 2), massive outflow of HWF (Group 3). Composition of the groups will follow this main theme as much as possible: some group members (optimally bigger part) represent states that face this challenge, the others are kinds of consultants to contribute with eyes and expertise. “fresh” are three statements in each group. (1/ A-B-C, 2/ A-B-C, 3/ A-B-C) statements are composed according to the three analytical dimension, reflecting the defined HWF mobility challenge area of that group . These reflect WP4 suggestion on related D042 recommendations, thus the results of the discussion and the agreed modification also serves as kind of a validation of that recommendation. (Table 3) COURSE OF DISCUSSION The chooses one group representative to give plenary summary and feedback (10 minutes) on the discussion of the group theme. A template supports to take notes of the discussion. Facilitated discussion of the HWF mobility challenge area according to the three main analytical dimension, and sharing views on the three statements. The group identifies together one related question they want to bring up at plenary. PLENARY FEEDBACK AND INTERACTIVE DISCUSSION Each group representative gives summary and feedback, plus shares the ONE question the group agreed on to have the other participants’ views (10+10 minutes / group). The template filled in can help the feedback and the plenary interaction.
Brief description of the groupwork: STRUCTURE There are three analytical dimensions (A, B, C). These are to structure and guide the group discussions. Each group will discuss what type(s) of HWF mobility to monitor, with what objective (A), what kind of indicators to consider for that (B), and how to collect data for those indicators (C). (Table 1) Possible indicators to focus according to three defined HWF mobility challenge areas are listed in Table 2 separately. There are three groups (1,2,3). Each group has a defined HWF mobility challenge area the group members focus on: training mobility (Group 1), reliance on foreign HWF (Group 2), massive outflow of HWF (Group 3). Composition of the groups will follow this main theme as much as possible: some group members (optimally bigger part) represent states that face this challenge, the others are kinds of consultants to contribute with “fresh” eyes and expertise. are three statements in each group. (1/ A-B-C, 2/ A-B-C, 3/ A-B-C) statements are composed according to the three analytical dimension, reflecting the defined HWF mobility challenge area of that group . These reflect WP4 suggestion on related D042 recommendations, thus the results of the discussion and the agreed modification also serves as kind of a validation of that recommendation. (Table 3) COURSE OF DISCUSSION The chooses one group representative to give plenary summary and feedback (10 minutes) on the discussion of the group theme. A template supports to take notes of the discussion. Facilitated discussion of the HWF mobility challenge area according to the three main analytical dimension, and sharing views on the three statements. The group identifies together one related question they want to bring up at plenary. PLENARY FEEDBACK AND INTERACTIVE DISCUSSION Each group representative gives summary and feedback, plus shares the ONE question the group agreed on to have the other participants’ views (10+10 minutes / group). The template filled in can help the feedback and the plenary interaction.
wp4_rome_pre-reading_-_mobility_groupwork_statements.docx