Probability: Low Impact: High MVD System Modernization project is Mitigation Strategy not delivered on-time, The vendor selected has an excellent on-time, on-budget budget and in scope. record, with high customer satisfaction ratings. Cost and Schedule management will be performed by the ITD PMO and the Business Project Manager (MVD Project Manager). The selected product is a COTS product, ‘true’ mitigating the risk for late delivery or overruns. Contingency Plan : TRD has already measures to mitigate this risk. Risk 3 Near Term, COTS Architecture will constrain the Vision of the Future – Probability: Low Impact: High Near Term, the selected COTS software will Mitigation Strategy constrain the MVD Vision The Technical (Systems) Architecture function will be of the Future responsible for ensuring the best decisions are made regarding architectural options available within the COTS architecture, and ensuring compliance with the previously selected options during development and implementation. TRD needs to assume responsibility for continuing dialogue with the SI and other states implementing the same COTS software, in order to continue a strategy that will allow MVD to have 80% of the transactions via virtual channels and 20% of the transactions via MVD field or partner offices. Contingency Plan : None. 2.0 2.1 List all of the major stakeholders in this project, and state why they have a stake. Stakeholders are individuals and . organizations that are actively involved in the project, or whose interests may be positively or negatively affected as a result of project execution or project completion. They may also exert influence over the project and its results. TRD Internal Stakeholders
MVD System Modernization project is not delivered on-time, and in scope. Probability: Low Impact: High Mitigation Strategy The vendor selected has an excellent on-time, on-budget record, with high customer satisfaction ratings. Cost and Schedule management will be performed by the ITD PMO and the Business Project Manager (MVD Project Manager). The selected product is a ‘true’ COTS product, mitigating the risk for late delivery or budget overruns. Contingency Plan : TRD has already measures to mitigate this risk. Risk 3 – Near Term, COTS Architecture will constrain the Vision of the Future Near Term, the selected COTS software will constrain the MVD Vision of the Future Probability: Low Impact: High Mitigation Strategy The Technical (Systems) Architecture function will be responsible for ensuring the best decisions are made regarding architectural options available within the COTS architecture, and ensuring compliance with the previously selected options during development and implementation. TRD needs to assume responsibility for continuing dialogue with the SI and other states implementing the same COTS software, in order to continue a strategy that will allow MVD to have 80% of the transactions via virtual channels and 20% of the transactions via MVD field or partner offices. Contingency Plan : None. 2.0 2.1 List all of the major stakeholders in this project, and state why they have a stake. . Stakeholders are individuals and organizations that are actively involved in the project, or whose interests may be positively or negatively affected as a result of project execution or project completion. They may also exert influence over the project and its results. TRD Internal Stakeholders
TRD-Tapestry%20PMP.docx