6 Aggregation tables: Table MS/ RBD/SU Number and size (area) of Aggregation on the Yes Quantitative and groundwater bodies by basis of the information chemical status of chemical status class. reported at water body groundwater bodies level. 7 Progress in achieving Map/ MS/ RBD/SU Number, area and Aggregation on the Not relevant in 2010 good chemical status Chart percentage of water basis of the information reporting since the first RBMP bodies which have reported at water body achieved good chemical level. status since the first RBMPs. 8 Improvement in Map/ MS/ RBD/SU Percentage of water Aggregation on the Not relevant in 2010 chemical status since Chart bodies which have basis of the information reporting the first RBMP improved status since the reported at water body first RBMP level. 9 Reasons behind Chart MS Exemptions reported by Aggregation on the No Article 4(4) Member States to extend basis of the information exemptions the deadline of the reported at water body achievement of good level. status beyond 2015 and reasons given (natural condition, technical feasibility, disproportionate costs or combinations). 10 Instances where Chart MS/ RBD/SU Number of groundwater Aggregation on the No Article 4(2)c of the bodies in which basis of the information Groundwater exceedances of quality reported at water body Directive has been standards and/or level. applied threshold values do not result in a failure of good chemical status 11 Percentage of Map/ EU/MS/RBD/ Number, area and Aggregation on the No groundwater bodies Chart/ SU percentage of basis of the information expected to be of Table groundwater bodies reported at water body good chemical status expected to be of good level. in 2015 chemical status in 2015. 12 Percentage of Map/ EU/MS/RBD/ Percentage of Aggregation on the No groundwater bodies Chart/ SU groundwater bodies at basis of the information at risk Table risk. reported at water body level. 13 Percentage of Map/ EU/MS/RBD/ Percentage of Aggregation on the No groundwater bodies Chart/ SU groundwater bodies basis of the information subject to an Table showing a significant and reported at water body environmentally sustained level. significant and anthropogenically sustained induced upward trend anthropogenically induced upward trend Notes: * Scale of information: EU = European; MS = National, Member State; RBD = River Basin District; SU = Sub-unit; WB = water body; Site = monitoring site Proposed contents of the 2016 reporting Schema sketch See Annex 10.3.
6 Aggregation tables: Quantitative and chemical status of groundwater bodies Table MS/ RBD/SU Number and size (area) of groundwater bodies by chemical status class. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. Yes 7 Progress in achieving good chemical status since the first RBMP Map/ Chart MS/ RBD/SU Number, area and percentage of water bodies which have achieved good chemical status since the first RBMPs. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. Not relevant in 2010 reporting 8 Improvement in chemical status since the first RBMP Map/ Chart MS/ RBD/SU Percentage of water bodies which have improved status since the first RBMP Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. Not relevant in 2010 reporting 9 Reasons behind Article 4(4) exemptions Chart MS Exemptions reported by Member States to extend the deadline of the achievement of good status beyond 2015 and reasons given (natural condition, technical feasibility, disproportionate costs or combinations). Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. No 10 Instances where Article 4(2)c of the Groundwater Directive has been applied Chart MS/ RBD/SU Number of groundwater bodies in which exceedances of quality standards and/or threshold values do not result in a failure of good chemical status Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. No 11 Percentage of groundwater bodies expected to be of good chemical status in 2015 Map/ Chart/ Table EU/MS/RBD/ SU Number, area and percentage of groundwater bodies expected to be of good chemical status in 2015. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. No 12 Percentage of groundwater bodies at risk Map/ Chart/ Table EU/MS/RBD/ SU Percentage of groundwater bodies at risk. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. No 13 Percentage of groundwater bodies subject to an environmentally significant and sustained anthropogenically induced upward trend Map/ Chart/ Table EU/MS/RBD/ SU Percentage of groundwater bodies showing a significant and sustained anthropogenically induced upward trend Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. No Notes: * Scale of information: EU = European; MS = National, Member State; RBD = River Basin District; SU = Sub-unit; WB = water body; Site = monitoring site Proposed contents of the 2016 reporting Schema sketch See Annex 10.3.
WFD_ReportingGuidance.docx