6.1 Evaluation Conduct Specifies team structure and Indicate how the evaluation will be relationship with WFP Evaluation conducted and led, including key Manager aspects of communication Consideration of ethical issues that List any potential ethical issues that may relate to the subject of the have already been identified and evaluation propose mitigation measures Evaluation schedule is logical and Specify ethical considerations for the provides adequate time for all conduct of the evaluation phases of the evaluation (including Include the evaluation schedule consultations on draft documents), and annex 2 in the TOR is used Specific tasks and outputs are identified for team members in the evaluation schedule. 6.2 Team composition and competencies The balance of competencies of the Indicate how the evaluation team will evaluation team are consistent with be composed (including gender, the subject of the evaluation and nationality, and if appropriate cultural include, for each member, expertise background) in one or more topics of the Key competencies and knowledge of evaluation evaluation team, including the Inclusion of gender parameters for appropriateness of the skills evaluation team combination for the evaluation; language skills; and leadership skills Address fluency in the language/s for the team leader spoken Specify gender expertise on the team Gender expertise is included and appropriate skills to assess gender Leadership, analytical and dimensions communication competencies are spelt out for the team leader 6.3 Security Considerations
6.1 Evaluation Conduct Indicate how the evaluation will be conducted and led, including key aspects of communication List any potential ethical issues that have already been identified and propose mitigation measures Specify ethical considerations for the conduct of the evaluation Include the evaluation schedule Specific tasks and outputs are identified for team members in the evaluation schedule. Specifies team structure and relationship with WFP Evaluation Manager Consideration of ethical issues that may relate to the subject of the evaluation Evaluation schedule is logical and provides adequate time for all phases of the evaluation (including consultations on draft documents), and annex 2 in the TOR is used 6.2 Team composition and competencies Indicate how the evaluation team will be composed (including gender, nationality, and if appropriate cultural background) Key competencies and knowledge of evaluation team, including the appropriateness of the skills combination for the evaluation; language skills; and leadership skills for the team leader Specify gender expertise on the team and appropriate skills to assess gender dimensions The balance of competencies of the evaluation team are consistent with the subject of the evaluation and include, for each member, expertise in one or more topics of the evaluation Inclusion of gender parameters for evaluation team Address fluency in the language/s spoken Gender expertise is included Leadership, analytical and communication competencies are spelt out for the team leader 6.3 Security Considerations
wfp277855.docx