Appendix Three: Excerpt from marking grid for this element of the assessment 0-19% 20 39% 40 49% 50 59% 60 69% 70 100% Areas for – – – – – Fail Fail Fail Pass Commendation Distinction improvement Failure to use the Inappropriate use The CI is unclear An adequate CI has A strong and detailed A very strong CI has Clearer CI(s) required template of template Incident is not been outlined CI has been provided been outlined Stronger focus on self in Failure to provide a No recognisable sufficiently focused on Appropriate toolkit Strong focus on self in Very strong focus on CI(s) incident incident self selected the CI self in the CI Use of more ‘critical’ ‘critical’ No discussion of Failure to select a Choice of toolkit is Discussion of the Detailed discussion of Identifies patterns of appropriate toolkit(s) relevant toolkit suitable toolkit poor and/or not toolkit findings is toolkit findings behaviour within CI More detailed (15%) 1 findings Inappropriate or relevant adequate Relevant strengths and Critical discussion of discussion of toolkit Inappropriate irrelevant Discussion of findings Identification of weaknesses are toolkit findings with findings identification of discussion of toolkit is not detailed enough appropriate strengths highlighted supporting references A more critical strengths and findings Strengths and and weaknesses Clear reference to Excellent analysis of approach to findings Incident weaknesses Strengths and weaknesses not Adequate reference to future career strengths and Stronger discussion on No discussion of weaknesses discussed future career implications weaknesses future implications future implications inconsistent sufficiently implications Detailed future Supporting references Critical Poor discussion of Inadequate implications are to enhance arguments future career discussion of future outlined. implications career implications 0-2 marks 3-5.5 marks 6-7 marks 7.5-8.5 marks 9-10 marks 10.5-15 marks 0-2
Appendix Three: Excerpt from marking grid for this element of the assessment 0-19% Fail 20 – 39% Fail 40 – 49% Fail 50 – 59% Pass 60 – 69% Commendation 70 – 100% Distinction Areas for improvement Critical Incident 1 (15%) Failure to use the required template Failure to provide a ‘critical’ incident No discussion of relevant toolkit findings Inappropriate identification of strengths and weaknesses No discussion of future implications Inappropriate use of template No recognisable ‘critical’ incident Failure to select a suitable toolkit Inappropriate or irrelevant discussion of toolkit findings Strengths and weaknesses inconsistent Poor discussion of future career implications The CI is unclear Incident is not sufficiently focused on self Choice of toolkit is poor and/or not relevant Discussion of findings is not detailed enough Strengths and weaknesses not discussed sufficiently Inadequate discussion of future career implications An adequate CI has been outlined Appropriate toolkit selected Discussion of the toolkit findings is adequate Identification of appropriate strengths and weaknesses Adequate reference to future career implications A strong and detailed CI has been provided Strong focus on self in the CI Detailed discussion of toolkit findings Relevant strengths and weaknesses are highlighted Clear reference to future career implications A very strong CI has been outlined Very strong focus on self in the CI Identifies patterns of behaviour within CI Critical discussion of toolkit findings with supporting references Excellent analysis of strengths and weaknesses Detailed future implications are outlined. Clearer CI(s) Stronger focus on self in CI(s) Use of more appropriate toolkit(s) More detailed discussion of toolkit findings A more critical approach to findings Stronger discussion on future implications Supporting references to enhance arguments 0-2 marks 3-5.5 marks 6-7 marks 7.5-8.5 marks 9-10 marks 10.5-15 marks 0-2
Using-critical-incidents-to-support-reflective-learning-for-Resource-Bank.docx