a definitive Fairly readers. left reader. content, but dictionary source for complete Approaching wanting, Not a most definition encyclopedic treatment the quality of but complete readers will of the information. of subject. a content picture, seek further topic. Good for professional may not not ready information. encyclopedia. be to be an complete academic for source. research. The bold border in Table 2 marks the dividing line between complete, accurate, reviewed articles with external sources (FA, FL, and A grade), thus suitable for use as an academic reference, while other graded articles could use outside sources and further research to verify the information contained. 4. Statistics on Wikipedia Usage As a first step in exploring how to manage Wikipedia as an academic reference, a survey instrument was developed in the spring semester of 2009 and distributed to 321 full-time, and adjunct faculty at a medium sized western college. This survey is an initial attempt at measuring how faculty view, use, and manage Wikipedia in their classes, research, and personal life. The survey is included as Appendix A. As a starting point, faculty perceptions, viewpoints, and group consensus are explored using the reported statistics from the survey. Issues to be explored are contained in the following lists. Faculty awareness of a) article controversy affects Wikipedia usage and trust. b) article vandalism affects Wikipedia usage and trust. c) protected pages affects Wikipedia usage and trust. d) article rank feature affects Wikipedia usage and trust. e) article revision history affects Wikipedia usage and trust.
a definitive source for encyclopedic information. Fairly complete treatment of subject. Good for readers. Approaching the quality of a professional encyclopedia. left wanting, but content may not be complete for research. reader. Not a complete picture, not ready to be an academic source. content, but most readers will seek further information. dictionary definition of the topic. The bold border in Table 2 marks the dividing line between complete, accurate, reviewed articles with external sources (FA, FL, and A grade), thus suitable for use as an academic reference, while other graded articles could use outside sources and further research to verify the information contained. 4. Statistics on Wikipedia Usage As a first step in exploring how to manage Wikipedia as an academic reference, a survey instrument was developed in the spring semester of 2009 and distributed to 321 full-time, and adjunct faculty at a medium sized western college. This survey is an initial attempt at measuring how faculty view, use, and manage Wikipedia in their classes, research, and personal life. The survey is included as Appendix A. As a starting point, faculty perceptions, viewpoints, and group consensus are explored using the reported statistics from the survey. Issues to be explored are contained in the following lists. Faculty awareness of a) article controversy affects Wikipedia usage and trust. b) article vandalism affects Wikipedia usage and trust. c) protected pages affects Wikipedia usage and trust. d) article rank feature affects Wikipedia usage and trust. e) article revision history affects Wikipedia usage and trust.
Wiki_MPMA_revised.docx