Damschroder et Concurrent Not reported Verbal probing whereby Termed their analysis as Nil al. (2005) and researcher prompted a descriptive analysis, retrospective respondent to expand on where they identified their TA statements and/or themes, and coded to provide retrospective transcripts according to reported of their thoughts to the themes. elicit more complete verbalisation Horwood at al. Not reported Asked 3 warm up Researcher did not interrupt Segmenting, application Researcher sat out of line (2014) (although questions. Questions respondent unless they were of the framework used by of sight of respondent appears to be not reported. silent for a few seconds, Al-Janabi et al. (2013) to when completing think concurrent when the researcher identify errors and aloud. with reminded them to think struggles. They then After completion of the retrospective aloud. reported using thematic questionnaire, the follow-up analysis to explore researcher asked any questions to problems questions which had participants’ clarify). with completing the arisen. measure. Mulhern et al. Concurrent Two warm up If the respondent was Framework analysis Nil (2012) and questions: unable to verbalise their retrospective thoughts they were asked Asked how many the reasoning behind their windows are there decision after providing an in your house? answer. Presented with a DCE question about a choice of holidays. (same one as used by Cheraghi-Sohi et
Damschroder et al. (2005) Concurrent and retrospective Not reported Verbal probing whereby researcher prompted respondent to expand on their TA statements and/or to provide retrospective reported of their thoughts to elicit more complete verbalisation Termed their analysis as a descriptive analysis, where they identified themes, and coded transcripts according to the themes. Nil Horwood at al. (2014) Not reported (although appears to be concurrent with retrospective follow-up questions to clarify). Asked 3 warm up questions. Questions not reported. Researcher did not interrupt respondent unless they were silent for a few seconds, when the researcher reminded them to think aloud. Segmenting, application of the framework used by Al-Janabi et al. (2013) to identify errors and struggles. They then reported using thematic analysis to explore participants’ problems with completing the measure. Researcher sat out of line of sight of respondent when completing think aloud. After completion of the questionnaire, the researcher asked any questions which had arisen. Mulhern et al. (2012) Concurrent and retrospective Two warm up questions: Asked how many windows are there in your house? Presented with a DCE question about a choice of holidays. (same one as used by Cheraghi-Sohi et If the respondent was unable to verbalise their thoughts they were asked the reasoning behind their decision after providing an answer. Framework analysis Nil
VKBrennan%20THESIS%20FINAL%20%28including%20appendix%29.docx