The improvement actions If no improvements are OR planned, then the program are specific, with a brief No improvements has provided a justification implementation plan (e.g., planned and no or rational, such as: 1) approximate dates of and justification or increase the benchmark, or person(s) responsible for explanation is given. explain why the benchmark implementation, and does not need to be where in increased; plans to curriculum/activities and focus on another area of department/program they concern for future will occur.) assessments, 3) and work to monitor and maintain the current level of success for this outcome (i.e., “because” statements). Academic Assessment Committee (AAC) Academic Affairs Office of Assessment 201 Donaghey Ave 215 Wingo Hall Conway, AR 72035 501-450-3253
The improvement actions are specific, with a brief implementation plan (e.g., approximate dates of and person(s) responsible for implementation, and where in curriculum/activities and department/program they will occur.) If no improvements are planned, then the program has provided a justification or rational, such as: 1) increase the benchmark, or explain why the benchmark does not need to be increased; plans to focus on another area of concern for future assessments, 3) and work to monitor and maintain the current level of success for this outcome (i.e., “because” statements). OR No improvements planned and no justification or explanation is given. Academic Assessment Committee (AAC) Academic Affairs Office of Assessment 201 Donaghey Ave 215 Wingo Hall Conway, AR 72035 501-450-3253
UCA-Academic-Unit-SLO-Report-Review-Rubric-20161118.docx