Education .02 .02 -.02 -.24* .37** .25 .05 (.05) (.07) (.09) (.09) (.12) (.20) (.09) Income -.02 -.03 -.00 .03 -.03 -.34 -.03** (.02) (.02) (.02) (.02) (.05) (.19) (.01) Age .01 .01 .01 -.01 .01 -.03 -.01 (.01) (.01) (.01) (.01) (.01) (.02) (.02) Church Attendance -.06 -.03 -.32** -.35** -.16 -.18 -.28** (.06) (.07) (.08) (.13) (.10) (.16) (.04) Deep South -.50* -.43* -.10 .01 -.70* .36 -.36 (.21) (.20) (.25) (.30) (.34) (.49) (.25) Intercept 4.96** 2.48* 5.61** .49 4.24* 10.89** 5.37** (.96) (1.01) (1.49) (1.44) (1.84) (2.69) (1.32) Pseduo-R2 .51 .47 .56 .58 .61 .78 .71 N 1024 994 930 587 764 526 2478 *p<.05, **p<.01 All dependent variables coded as 2 party vote 1984 to 2000: Analysis of American National Election Study data. The white identity measure is the dichotomous “Feel close to Whites” measure. 2008: Cooperative Congressional Election Study Data. See Appendix A for white identity wording. 2012: American National Election Study data. See Appendix A for white identity wording. 1984 standard errors clustered on counties; 1988 and 1992 on census tracts; 1996 and 2000 counties; 2008 and 2012 Congressional Districts Starting with 1992, all models employ sample weights Deep South: Respondents in former Confederacy states of South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina.
Education .02 (.05) .02 (.07) -.02 (.09) -.24* (.09) .37** (.12) .25 (.20) .05 (.09) Income -.02 (.02) -.03 (.02) -.00 (.02) .03 (.02) -.03 (.05) -.34 (.19) -.03** (.01) Age .01 (.01) .01 (.01) .01 (.01) -.01 (.01) .01 (.01) -.03 (.02) -.01 (.02) Church Attendance -.06 (.06) -.03 (.07) -.32** (.08) -.35** (.13) -.16 (.10) -.18 (.16) -.28** (.04) Deep South -.50* (.21) -.43* (.20) -.10 (.25) .01 (.30) -.70* (.34) .36 (.49) -.36 (.25) Intercept 4.96** (.96) 2.48* (1.01) 5.61** (1.49) .49 (1.44) 4.24* (1.84) 10.89** (2.69) 5.37** (1.32) Pseduo-R2 .51 .47 .56 .58 .61 .78 .71 N 1024 994 930 587 764 526 2478 *p<.05, **p<.01 All dependent variables coded as 2 party vote 1984 to 2000: Analysis of American National Election Study data. The white identity measure is the dichotomous “Feel close to Whites” measure. 2008: Cooperative Congressional Election Study Data. See Appendix A for white identity wording. 2012: American National Election Study data. See Appendix A for white identity wording. 1984 standard errors clustered on counties; 1988 and 1992 on census tracts; 1996 and 2000 counties; 2008 and 2012 Congressional Districts Starting with 1992, all models employ sample weights Deep South: Respondents in former Confederacy states of South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina.
whid-paper-2016-randr1-final.docx