dissemination and popularisation activity, also includes artistic activities academic policy and administrative activity, including execution of duties, participation in committees, assessment of positions and competence, opponent in disputations, representation on public boards and committees, etc. any other qualifying activity stipulated in the detailed description any other activity to which the applicant attaches significance For further information about requirements for teaching qualifications, refer to UiT’s website covering teacher training courses and the National recommended guidelines for basic pedagogical competence in higher education issued by the Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions (UHR). The applicant must also prepare a list of all his/her academic works. The list shall contain the following information about each work: author(s), the work’s title for articles: the journal’s name and volume, the first and last page of the article, year of publication for books and other independent publications: publisher, printer, year of publication, number of pages performing arts such as compositions, recordings, works of art, etc.: year, duration, participating artists For submission of the academic works, the units may choose between the following two alternatives. The detailed description must clearly state the chosen alternative. The alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: The works (published or unpublished) the applicant wishes to be taken into consideration during the competence assessment process Alternative 2: Up to 10 works that are central to the applicant’s production. The applicant’s doctoral thesis, including works performed as a PhD candidate on a fellowship programme for artistic research, is regarded in this context as one work. For both alternatives, the applicant shall provide a description of his/her scientific production/artistic production, in which he/she points out which are the most important in relation to the announced position and, as such, shall be the main emphasis of the assessment. A brief description of the other listed works shall also be included to demonstrate depth of production. These descriptions shall be an attachment to the application. The application and appendices must be submitted electronically via the application portal. An exemption from electronic submission may be relevant for certain scientific and artistic works. The unit, or the underlying level, may require that the scientific works to be assessed are submitted in a certain language, e.g. a Scandinavian language or English. If there is a requirement relating to language, this must be reflected in the detailed description. 4. Assessment (Section 5 of the Personnel regulations)
dissemination and popularisation activity, also includes artistic activities academic policy and administrative activity, including execution of duties, participation in committees, assessment of positions and competence, opponent in disputations, representation on public boards and committees, etc. any other qualifying activity stipulated in the detailed description any other activity to which the applicant attaches significance For further information about requirements for teaching qualifications, refer to UiT’s website covering teacher training courses and the National recommended guidelines for basic pedagogical competence in higher education issued by the Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions (UHR). The applicant must also prepare a list of all his/her academic works. The list shall contain the following information about each work: author(s), the work’s title for articles: the journal’s name and volume, the first and last page of the article, year of publication for books and other independent publications: publisher, printer, year of publication, number of pages performing arts such as compositions, recordings, works of art, etc.: year, duration, participating artists For submission of the academic works, the units may choose between the following two alternatives. The detailed description must clearly state the chosen alternative. The alternatives are as follows: Alternative 1: The works (published or unpublished) the applicant wishes to be taken into consideration during the competence assessment process Alternative 2: Up to 10 works that are central to the applicant’s production. The applicant’s doctoral thesis, including works performed as a PhD candidate on a fellowship programme for artistic research, is regarded in this context as one work. For both alternatives, the applicant shall provide a description of his/her scientific production/artistic production, in which he/she points out which are the most important in relation to the announced position and, as such, shall be the main emphasis of the assessment. A brief description of the other listed works shall also be included to demonstrate depth of production. These descriptions shall be an attachment to the application. The application and appendices must be submitted electronically via the application portal. An exemption from electronic submission may be relevant for certain scientific and artistic works. The unit, or the underlying level, may require that the scientific works to be assessed are submitted in a certain language, e.g. a Scandinavian language or English. If there is a requirement relating to language, this must be reflected in the detailed description. 4. Assessment (Section 5 of the Personnel regulations)
Utfyllende%20bestemmelser%20engelsk%20jan2017.docx