Yes / Not clear / No existing to be services checked IPR awareness Is the TCS taking into citation planning to planning to account IPR? needed use use Yes, IPR is clearly taken into EPOS IPR DOI EPOS IPR account / Not clear / No rules rules information Working Group 1 2 3 4 5a 5b 6 8 9 10 Seis Volc Geol Geod OBS NF Labs Sat Mag IndS Summary of the cost assessment No financial No Financial No existing Seems to build No existing No financial Clear plan solid, detailed, clear separation info financial Plan under services services already services info but some between existing / new costs info revision existing in other services WGs already exist Clear plan / no existing services or new in other services proposed / Problems / financial WGs info not available Funding model funding sources for ex. High No financial No Financial No existing No existing No existing No financial Not clear how No existing expenses not info financial Plan under services services services info existing services services justified info revision services integrate into solid, clearly explained, detailed Financial EPOS; Clear plan / plan exists but issues / Problems / info not available or no existing services long term sustainability for Major No financial No Financial No existing No existing No existing No financial Nations keep No existing shortfall info financial Plan under services services services info support 5but services existing services imminent @ info revision not clear for EMSC. Other the additional existing costs secured or strong services costs to adapt strategy to secure the missing (AHEAD, to EPOS) Orfeus, ESM, part, clear vision of the future EFEHR) rely on Clear plan / plan exists but issues / continuing Problems / info not available or no support at 1 existing services institution
Yes / Not clear / No existing services to be checked IPR awareness Is the TCS taking into account IPR? Yes, IPR is clearly taken into account / Not clear / No information citation needed planning to use EPOS IPR rules DOI planning to use EPOS IPR rules Working Group 1 Seis 2 Volc 3 Geol 4 Geod 5a OBS 5b NF 6 Labs 8 Sat 9 Mag 10 IndS Financial Summary of the cost assessment solid, detailed, clear separation between existing / new costs Clear plan / no existing services or new services proposed / Problems / financial info not available No financial info No financial info Financial Plan under revision No existing services Seems to build services already existing in other WGs No existing services No financial info Clear plan but some services already exist in other WGs Funding model funding sources for ex. services solid, clearly explained, detailed Clear plan / plan exists but issues / Problems / info not available or no existing services High expenses not justified No financial info No financial info Financial Plan under revision No existing services No existing services No existing services No financial info Not clear how existing services integrate into EPOS; No existing services long term sustainability for existing services existing costs secured or strong strategy to secure the missing part, clear vision of the future Clear plan / plan exists but issues / Problems / info not available or no existing services Major shortfall imminent @ EMSC. Other services (AHEAD, Orfeus, ESM, EFEHR) rely on continuing support at 1 institution No financial info No financial info Financial Plan under revision No existing services No existing services No existing services No financial info Nations keep support 5but not clear for the additional costs to adapt to EPOS) No existing services
WG10%20TCS%20revision-1.docx