represents those scoring in the “developing and proficient” levels. Policies How often are your Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) and other technology-related policies updated (Please check one below)? Every year Every other year At least every three years Other: Due for revision in 2012-13 Insert a link to your district’s AUP below if it is stored on the Web: Online Assessments When filling out the table below, please consider the following conditions: The number and percentage of students at each grade level that can have high-speed Internet access at the same time. The students are grouped in clusters of no more than 30 and no less than 10 students. The students remain in their own school. The maximum number of Grade 4 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions. 414 The percentage of Grade 4 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions (number 54% accommodated/total number of Grade 4 students). The maximum number of Grade 6 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions. 624 The percentage of Grade 6 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions (number 84% accommodated/total number of Grade 6 students). The maximum number of Grade 8 students who could be accommodated under these conditions. 624 The percentage of Grade 8 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions (number 78% accommodated/total number of Grade 8 students). The maximum number of Grade 10 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions. 648 The percentage of Grade 10 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions (number 87% accommodated/total number of Grade 10 students). Planning Committee The Educational Technology Planning Committee should represent all stakeholders. Development of the educational technology plan and implementation of the plan should enable parents, educators, students and community members to benefit from the investment in technology and all should have representation on the committee. Member Title Constituency Represented Sally Alubicki Dir. Teaching & admin Assessment
represents those scoring in the “developing and proficient” levels. Policies How often are your Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) and other technology-related policies updated (Please check one below)? Every year Every other year At least every three years Other: Due for revision in 2012-13 Insert a link to your district’s AUP below if it is stored on the Web: Online Assessments When filling out the table below, please consider the following conditions: The number and percentage of students at each grade level that can have high-speed Internet access at the same time. The students are grouped in clusters of no more than 30 and no less than 10 students. The students remain in their own school. The maximum number of Grade 4 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions. 414 The percentage of Grade 4 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions (number accommodated/total number of Grade 4 students). 54% The maximum number of Grade 6 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions. 624 The percentage of Grade 6 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions (number accommodated/total number of Grade 6 students). 84% The maximum number of Grade 8 students who could be accommodated under these conditions. 624 The percentage of Grade 8 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions (number accommodated/total number of Grade 8 students). 78% The maximum number of Grade 10 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions. 648 The percentage of Grade 10 students who could be accommodated under the above conditions (number accommodated/total number of Grade 10 students). 87% Planning Committee The Educational Technology Planning Committee should represent all stakeholders. Development of the educational technology plan and implementation of the plan should enable parents, educators, students and community members to benefit from the investment in technology and all should have representation on the committee. Member Title Constituency Represented Sally Alubicki Dir. Teaching & Assessment admin
West_Hartford_2012-2015_CT_Ed_Tech_Plan.docx