provided such that the provided such that the one of the following is collection process or reviewer fully understands external reviewer fully missing: time/semester data was not collected. the data collection understands the data and place, sampling methodology (for collection methodology process, population example: time/semester (for example: description, and/or data and place, sampling time/semester and place, review process). process, population sampling process, OR descriptions, and/or data population description, There appears to be a review process). and/or data review mismatch between data AND process). collected and the If a rubric, grading scale, AND student learning or scoring sheet was used, If a rubric, grading scale, outcome(s) being it is appropriate to the or scoring sheet was used, assessed. purposes, and a sample it is appropriate to the document is appended to purpose, and a sample the report. document is appended to AND the report. Two or more reviewers are used in the data review process, or provide a secondary validation method (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha, validity survey, validating focus group). Exemplary (3) Accomplished (2) Emerging (1) Beginning (0) Summary of Results Results are present, Results are present, Results are present and No results are present. specific, and disaggregated specific, and disaggregated provided in aggregate OR within the sample within the sample format only (e.g., 80% Results do not match population (e.g., population (e.g., of the students met the the assessment tool(s) or methodology (e.g.,
provided such that the reviewer fully understands the data collection methodology (for example: time/semester and place, sampling process, population descriptions, and/or data review process). AND If a rubric, grading scale, or scoring sheet was used, it is appropriate to the purposes, and a sample document is appended to the report. AND Two or more reviewers are used in the data review process, or provide a secondary validation method (e.g., Cronbach’s alpha, validity survey, validating focus group). provided such that the external reviewer fully understands the data collection methodology (for example: time/semester and place, sampling process, population description, and/or data review process). AND If a rubric, grading scale, or scoring sheet was used, it is appropriate to the purpose, and a sample document is appended to the report. one of the following is missing: time/semester and place, sampling process, population description, and/or data review process). OR There appears to be a mismatch between data collected and the student learning outcome(s) being assessed. collection process or data was not collected. Exemplary (3) Accomplished (2) Emerging (1) Beginning (0) Summary of Results Results are present, specific, and disaggregated within the sample population (e.g., Results are present, specific, and disaggregated within the sample population (e.g., Results are present and provided in aggregate format only (e.g., 80% of the students met the No results are present. OR Results do not match the assessment tool(s) or methodology (e.g.,
UCA-Academic-Unit-SLO-Report-Review-Rubric-20161118.docx