(103rd workforce Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1) (pp. 70-104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Tables TABLE 1 Summary statistics for teachers by layoff threat (teacher-year observations), 2008-09 to 2009-10 RIF % Overall No RIF Laid off- 45,571 4,688 2,147 All Teachers 52,406 87.0% 8.9% 4.1% Experience / education Novice teachers (1st - 3rd year) 10.4% 52.7% 19.7% 27.5% Mid - career teachers (4th - 8th year) 24.3% 75.4% 21.2% 3.4% Veteran teachers (9th year or above) 65.3% 96.7% 2.7% 0.6% Mean years of experience 9.3 10.1 4.7 2.5 degree or higher 34.2% 88.5% 8.4% 3.0% Master’s Endorsement area Special Education 12.6% 96.0% 1.7% 2.2% Math or Science 12.9% 86.8% 11.8% 1.4% Other non-elementary 29.3% 87.2% 7.0% 5.8% Elementary 45.2% 84.3% 11.4% 4.3% to teacher who did not receive a reduction-in-force (RIF) implies the Note: “No RIF” refers notice; “RIF-rescinded” teacher received a RIF-notice, but it was the teacher was laid off, but later rescinded; “Laid off-return” means returns in the following year; and off-no refers to teachers that were laid off and do not return the “Laid return” following year. The % overall column shows the overall proportion for each teacher characteristic districtwide (within categories, columns sum to 100%). The next four columns show how those characteristics are distributed across four RIF/layoff categories (rows sum to 100%). For example, 10.4% of teachers are novice and of those, 52.7% were not RIFed. TABLE 2 Summary statistics of student characteristics by Reed treatment group, 2010-11 to 2011-12
workforce (103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1) (pp. 70-104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Tables TABLE 1 Summary statistics for teachers by layoff threat (teacher-year observations), 2008-09 to 2009-10 % Overall No RIF RIF Laid off- All Teachers 52,406 45,571 4,688 2,147 87.0% 8.9% 4.1% Experience / education Novice teachers (1st - 3rd year) 10.4% 52.7% 19.7% 27.5% Mid - career teachers (4th - 8th year) 24.3% 75.4% 21.2% 3.4% Veteran teachers (9th year or above) 65.3% 96.7% 2.7% 0.6% Mean years of experience 9.3 10.1 4.7 2.5 Master’s degree or higher 34.2% 88.5% 8.4% 3.0% Endorsement area Special Education 12.6% 96.0% 1.7% 2.2% Math or Science 12.9% 86.8% 11.8% 1.4% Other non-elementary 29.3% 87.2% 7.0% 5.8% Elementary 45.2% 84.3% 11.4% 4.3% Note: “No RIF” refers to teacher who did not receive a reduction-in-force (RIF) notice; “RIF-rescinded” implies the teacher received a RIF-notice, but it was later rescinded; “Laid off-return” means the teacher was laid off, but returns in the following year; and “Laid off-no return” refers to teachers that were laid off and do not return the following year. The % overall column shows the overall proportion for each teacher characteristic districtwide (within categories, columns sum to 100%). The next four columns show how those characteristics are distributed across four RIF/layoff categories (rows sum to 100%). For example, 10.4% of teachers are novice and of those, 52.7% were not RIFed. TABLE 2 Summary statistics of student characteristics by Reed treatment group, 2010-11 to 2011-12
Who%20Bears%20the%20Costs%20of%20District%20Funding%20Cuts.docx