Identify the percentage of students assessed that should be able to demonstrate Performance Outcome: proficiency in this student learning outcome and the level of proficiency expected. Example: 80% of the students assessed will achieve a score of or higher on the Oral Presentation Scoring Rubric. “acceptable” a copy of the scoring rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, is to be (Note: submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive.) This assessment measure will be embedded into program coursework and reported on in the 2016 reports. NOTE: our data sources have changed; therefore there will be here one Assessment Data: two tables – for Spring 2014-Fall 2014 data, and one for Spring 2015-Fall 2015 data. Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data Semester Spring 2014 Fall 2014 Count 1 2 100% 100% TIP, EE2A: 3g Count 1 2 100% 100% TIP, EE2A: 3h Count 5 1 100% 100% TIP, EE2B: 4c Spring 2015-Fall 2015 Assessment Data There are no data currently available for the revised SLO 4. Data will be reported for the 2016 report year. Changes to be implemented Fall 2016: Based upon the 2015 assessment data included in this annual report, what changes/improvements will the program implement during the next academic year to improve performance on this student learning outcome? We will continue to analyze data to find points of instructional and evaluative improvements. College: __College of Education ________________________________________________________ Department: __Reading and Elementary Education ________________________________________ Program: Masters of Education in Reading Education _____________________________________
Performance Outcome: Identify the percentage of students assessed that should be able to demonstrate proficiency in this student learning outcome and the level of proficiency expected. Example: 80% of the students assessed will achieve a score of “acceptable” or higher on the Oral Presentation Scoring Rubric. (Note: a copy of the scoring rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, is to be submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive.) This assessment measure will be embedded into program coursework and reported on in the 2016 reports. Assessment Data: NOTE: our data sources have changed; therefore there will be two tables here – one for Spring 2014-Fall 2014 data, and one for Spring 2015-Fall 2015 data. Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data Semester Spring 2014 Fall 2014 Count 1 2 TIP, EE2A: 3g 100% 100% Count 1 2 TIP, EE2A: 3h 100% 100% Count 5 1 TIP, EE2B: 4c 100% 100% Spring 2015-Fall 2015 Assessment Data There are no data currently available for the revised SLO 4. Data will be reported for the 2016 report year. Changes to be implemented Fall 2016: Based upon the 2015 assessment data included in this annual report, what changes/improvements will the program implement during the next academic year to improve performance on this student learning outcome? We will continue to analyze data to find points of instructional and evaluative improvements. College: __College of Education ________________________________________________________ Department: __Reading and Elementary Education ________________________________________ Program: Masters of Education in Reading Education _____________________________________
2015-16%20Annual%20Report%20REEL.docx