Figure 6, it can be seen that of the intumescent coatings of is similar to the curve for Therefore, in this paper, it is assumed that the viscosity of the intumescent coatings studied by is that of curve for PP-APP/PER. Figure 7 shows the recorded relationship for PP-APP/PER and the fitted polynomial curve for use in this paper. Figure 8 shows the measured viscosity temperature relationships for the intumescent – coatings of . Figure 6 TGA curves of different mixture of intumescent coatings [] Figure 7 Assumed viscosity temperature relationship, based on heat-treated PP/PER/APP – system of Figure 8 Viscosity-temperature relationships for the intumescent coatings of Muller [] Mathematical Model Results and Comparison Zhang et al. [9] and carried out two series of tests, one under furnace fire exposure and one under cone calorimeter. performed cone calorimeter tests using different intumescent coating formulations. Comparison will be made for these three series of tests. Comparison for furnace fire tests of The furnace fire tests of were conducted by placing intumescent coated steel plates, all measuring 100 mm by 100 mm in planar dimensions but different plates having different thicknesses, each with the same intumescent coating thickness on both sides, to fire exposure
Figure 6, it can be seen that of the intumescent coatings of is similar to the curve for Therefore, in this paper, it is assumed that the viscosity of the intumescent coatings studied by is that of curve for PP-APP/PER. Figure 7 shows the recorded relationship for PP-APP/PER and the fitted polynomial curve for use in this paper. Figure 8 shows the measured viscosity – temperature relationships for the intumescent coatings of . Figure 6 TGA curves of different mixture of intumescent coatings [] Figure 7 Assumed viscosity – temperature relationship, based on heat-treated PP/PER/APP system of Figure 8 Viscosity-temperature relationships for the intumescent coatings of Muller [] Mathematical Model Results and Comparison Zhang et al. [9] and carried out two series of tests, one under furnace fire exposure and one under cone calorimeter. performed cone calorimeter tests using different intumescent coating formulations. Comparison will be made for these three series of tests. Comparison for furnace fire tests of The furnace fire tests of were conducted by placing intumescent coated steel plates, all measuring 100 mm by 100 mm in planar dimensions but different plates having different thicknesses, each with the same intumescent coating thickness on both sides, to fire exposure
with_Burak_theory.docx