Kenya Malawi Uganda Ghana Niger Zambia Ethiopia MOHPHS has to Potential CLTS Harmonizing Staffing from Implementation Stakeholder a)Health Extension do CLTS. This project organizations Plan Ghana- Of CLTS in area Program Supervisors dependency on issues means lots of participants’ hijacking the high turnover of Which have force Health Plan to support pressure; expectation for programme CLTS staff subsidised Extension Workers pre-trigger facilitation is hardware support Lack of programme latrines; pressure to trigger villages exercise and minimal from the project to start activities without keenly inadequate Personal in Plan emanating from because of the doing pre-triggering sustainability Kenya to support their previous between the delay (April issues CLTS on the experiences of different 2011); choice of approach of group- e.g. hardware projects organizations first communities b)Scattered champion currently only implemented by and government as part of communities facilitators one person at Plan Sierra Leone. TOT training in Plan Kenya Managing such precipitation focusing on CLTS expectation remains a challenge during triggering. Triggering Allowance issues Community Creating real Mixed Resources for Relaxation of Stakeholder a)Poor quality of as different members who have ownership- so approaches (e.g. doing CLTS (e.g. engoueent in triggering leading to dependency on organizations witnessed CLTS not community PHAST) being petrol to go to some poor quality ODF Plan support provide different triggering ownership but used in the villages) communities; (stationery, (a processes in individual villages Persistence of b)Lack of potable “promises” allowances and form of subside) communities do behaviour Subside issue the susidy idea; water in the transport) and share the process change from other Communities communities inadequate involved CLTS and programmes found hope to beforehand and resources Scaling up the obtain from Plan sustainability this has negatively required- CLTS quality of new investments approach of affected the shame is low cost but facilitators after CLTS project champion and disgust that this does not Implementation; facilitators ignite them into mean no costs action. It only
Kenya Malawi Uganda Ghana Niger Zambia Ethiopia issues MOHPHS has to do CLTS. This means lots of pressure; facilitation is minimal Personal in Plan Kenya to support CLTS on the group- e.g. currently only one person at Plan Kenya focusing on CLTS Potential CLTS project participants’ expectation for hardware support from the project emanating from their previous experiences of hardware projects implemented by Plan Sierra Leone. Managing such expectation remains a challenge during triggering. organizations hijacking the programme Lack of between the different organizations and government Harmonizing CLTS programme Staffing from Plan Ghana- high turnover of staff Implementation Of CLTS in area Which have subsidised latrines; pressure to start activities because of the delay (April 2011); choice of first communities as part of TOT training in precipitation Stakeholder dependency on Plan to support pre-trigger exercise and inadequate sustainability approach of champion facilitators a)Health Extension Program Supervisors force Health Extension Workers to trigger villages without keenly doing pre-triggering issues b)Scattered communities Triggering Allowance issues as different organizations provide different “promises” (a form of subside) Community members who have witnessed CLTS triggering processes in communities do share the process involved beforehand and this has negatively affected the shame and disgust that ignite them into action. It only Creating real ownership- so not community ownership but individual behaviour change CLTS and resources required- CLTS is low cost but this does not mean no costs Mixed approaches (e.g. PHAST) being used in the villages Subside issue from other programmes Scaling up the quality of facilitators Resources for doing CLTS (e.g. petrol to go to villages) Relaxation of engoueent in some communities; Persistence of the susidy idea; Communities found hope to obtain from Plan new investments after CLTS project Implementation; Stakeholder dependency on Plan support (stationery, allowances and transport) and inadequate sustainability approach of champion facilitators a)Poor quality of triggering leading to poor quality ODF b)Lack of potable water in the communities
WorkshopreportLAKampalaUgandaff.docx