observation during the visits accepted the interviews, some of to the properties) them preferred not to receive the direct observation visits in their properties.” models/tools: as good to explore positive, evaluation of the first “Identified “Very Input for ES mapping suitability and scenarios but not conflicts maps already done.” through Backdating considered within WP3 methods. transitions matrices; For the case study based on CAB Markov Chains, DINAMICA consultation only spatial tools are acceptable in order to target EGO, Weights of Evidence (weighted Bayes approach) planning and operationalization of (scenarios towards 2050) ES and future visions. This tool fulfills the expectations for the region, two workshops with the CAB already took place to incorporate feedbacks and inputs.” models/tools: data collection phase gave “The promising outputs.” A novel approach based on crowd-sourced information analysis and GIS) Other models/tools: have existing experience “We with the model and are aware of SPECIES-model for Climate its advantages and limitations.” envelope modeling Other models/tools: technical issues, slow “Several model adaptation.” Biome-BGC terrestrial ecosystem model models/tools: forest department officials department is planning to “The “Forest found the method useful.” replicate the model in other sites as Eco Chain well.” Other models/tools: participated in “Stakeholders ESM-App (in combination survey; feedback was used to with questionnaire) improve questionnaire.” from the case studies All the case studies were to summarize the most-important lessons-learned sofar as project is at the halfway point (December 2014) (Q3). It was a very open question, where CS had the freedom to answer the question (there was no limitation for text). All case studies, except 2 answered this question (N=25). We realize that this is an interim reflection of the case studies on the operationalization of ES concepts and tools. Nevertheless, we feel that some interesting themes are starting to appear. They are summarized in Table 4.1. In the below analysis, we are always indicating the case studies (CSxx) who phrased a certain lesson-learned. Table 4.1: Topics emerging from the lessons-learned from the OpenNESS case studies related to the operationalization of ES concepts and tools (N=25, December 2014).
observation during the visits to the properties) accepted the interviews, some of them preferred not to receive the direct observation visits in their properties.” models/tools: Input for ES mapping through Backdating transitions matrices; Markov Chains, DINAMICA EGO, Weights of Evidence (weighted Bayes approach) (scenarios towards 2050) “Identified as good to explore suitability and scenarios but not considered within WP3 methods. For the case study based on CAB consultation only spatial tools are acceptable in order to target planning and operationalization of ES and future visions. This tool fulfills the expectations for the region, two workshops with the CAB already took place to incorporate feedbacks and inputs.” “Very positive, evaluation of the first conflicts maps already done.” models/tools: A novel approach based on crowd-sourced information analysis and GIS) “The data collection phase gave promising outputs.” Other models/tools: SPECIES-model for Climate envelope modeling “We have existing experience with the model and are aware of its advantages and limitations.” Other models/tools: Biome-BGC terrestrial ecosystem model “Several technical issues, slow model adaptation.” models/tools: Eco Chain “The forest department officials found the method useful.” “Forest department is planning to replicate the model in other sites as well.” Other models/tools: ESM-App (in combination with questionnaire) “Stakeholders participated in survey; feedback was used to improve questionnaire.” from the case studies All the case studies were to summarize the most-important lessons-learned sofar as project is at the halfway point (December 2014) (Q3). It was a very open question, where CS had the freedom to answer the question (there was no limitation for text). All case studies, except 2 answered this question (N=25). We realize that this is an interim reflection of the case studies on the operationalization of ES concepts and tools. Nevertheless, we feel that some interesting themes are starting to appear. They are summarized in Table 4.1. In the below analysis, we are always indicating the case studies (CSxx) who phrased a certain lesson-learned. Table 4.1: Topics emerging from the lessons-learned from the OpenNESS case studies related to the operationalization of ES concepts and tools (N=25, December 2014).
WP5_D52_20March2015.docx