the presentation of allow time for discussion/activities; participants or speech 2 materials seem rushed discussion; doesn’t have sometimes states but but still completes all 3 Somewhat rushed time for examples; tells does not explain the materials; appears 4 or hurried? participants they are in a material. relaxed. 5 Not rushed hurry; body language suggests stress or hurry. 4. To what extent did 1 - Less than 25% seem 3 - About half 5 - 75-100% 1 Little understanding the participants appear to understand. understand. understand. 2 to understand the 3 Some participation material? 4 5 Good understanding 5. How actively did the 1 - Less than 25% 3 - About half 5 - 75-100% 1 Little participation group members participate participate. participate. 2 participate in 3 Some participation discussions and 4 activities? 5 Active participation 6. On the following scale, rate the facilitator on the following qualities: Question 1 Looks like: 5 Looks like: Rating Comments Knowledge of the Cannot answer Provides information 1 Poor program questions, above and beyond 2 mispronounces what’s in the manual; 3 Average reads from the manual. seems very familiar with 4 the concepts and 5 Excellent answers questions with ease. Level of enthusiasm Presents information in a Makes clear that the 1 Poor dry and boring way; program is a great 2 lacks personal opportunity; gets 3 Average connection to material; participants talking and 4 appears burned out. excited; outgoing. 5 Excellent Poise and confidence Appears nervous or Does not hesitate in 1 Poor hurried; does not have addressing concerns. 2 good eye contact. Well organized, not 3 Average nervous. 4 5 Excellent
the presentation of materials seem rushed or hurried? allow time for discussion; doesn’t have time for examples; tells participants they are in a hurry; body language suggests stress or hurry. discussion/activities; sometimes states but does not explain material. participants or speech but still completes all the materials; appears relaxed. 2 3 Somewhat rushed 4 5 Not rushed 4. To what extent did the participants appear to understand the material? 1 - Less than 25% seem to understand. 3 - About half understand. 5 - 75-100% understand. 1 Little understanding 2 3 Some participation 4 5 Good understanding 5. How actively did the group members participate in discussions and activities? 1 - Less than 25% participate 3 - About half participate. 5 - 75-100% participate. 1 Little participation 2 3 Some participation 4 5 Active participation 6. On the following scale, rate the facilitator on the following qualities: Question 1 Looks like: 5 Looks like: Rating Comments Knowledge of the program Cannot answer questions, mispronounces reads from the manual. Provides information above and beyond what’s in the manual; seems very familiar with the concepts and answers questions with ease. 1 Poor 2 3 Average 4 5 Excellent Level of enthusiasm Presents information in a dry and boring way; lacks personal connection to material; appears burned out. Makes clear that the program is a great opportunity; gets participants talking and excited; outgoing. 1 Poor 2 3 Average 4 5 Excellent Poise and confidence Appears nervous or hurried; does not have good eye contact. Does not hesitate in addressing concerns. Well organized, not nervous. 1 Poor 2 3 Average 4 5 Excellent
TPPI-AP3-SupervisorProgramObservationForm.docx