Annex D - Aid Quality Check ratings AQC ratings Approved and budget year on Investment name and year equality and duration Monitoring Gender Relevance Effectiveness Efficiency Evaluation Risks Sustainability Safeguards INJ577 Integrated Coastal Management Program $21 m 2017 AQC 5 5 5 5 5 5 n/a (ICMP) 2013-18 2016 AQC 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 INL487Aus4Skills $17 m 2017 AQC 5 5 5 5 4 5 n/a 2016-19 2016 AQC n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a INL081Climate Innovation $3 m 2017 AQC 6 5 4 5 4 4 n/a Center (VCIC) 2013-18 2016 AQC 5 4 3 4 4 3 4 INK042 Cao Lanh M&E Social $130.5m 2017 AQC 5 4 5 5 5 5 n/a Development, Diplomacy & Civil Work 2011 -21 2016 AQC 5 5 6 5 5 4 5 INL354 Restructuring $3.6m 2017 AQC 5 4 4 4 5 4 n/a Competitive Vietnam (RCV) 2014-17 2016 AQC 5 5 5 3 5 4 4 Definitions of rating scale: Satisfactory (4, 5 and 6) 6 = Very good; satisfies criteria in all areas. 5 = Good; satisfies criteria in almost all areas. 4 = Adequate; on balance, satisfies criteria; does not fail in any major area. Less than satisfactory (1, 2 and 3) 3 = Less than adequate; on balance does not satisfy criteria and/or in at least one major area. 2 = Poor; does not satisfy criteria in major areas. 1 = Very poor; does not satisfy criteria in many major area.
Annex D - Aid Quality Check ratings AQC ratings Investment name Approved budget and duration year on year Relevance Effectiveness Efficiency Monitoring and Evaluation Sustainability Gender equality Risks and Safeguards INJ577 Integrated Coastal Management Program (ICMP) $21 m 2017 AQC 5 5 5 5 5 5 n/a 2013-18 2016 AQC 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 INL487Aus4Skills $17 m 2017 AQC 5 5 5 5 4 5 n/a 2016-19 2016 AQC n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a INL081Climate Innovation Center (VCIC) $3 m 2017 AQC 6 5 4 5 4 4 n/a 2013-18 2016 AQC 5 4 3 4 4 3 4 INK042 Cao Lanh M&E Social Development, Diplomacy & Civil Work $130.5m 2017 AQC 5 4 5 5 5 5 n/a 2011 -21 2016 AQC 5 5 6 5 5 4 5 INL354 Restructuring Competitive Vietnam (RCV) $3.6m 2017 AQC 5 4 4 4 5 4 n/a 2014-17 2016 AQC 5 5 5 3 5 4 4 Definitions of rating scale: Satisfactory (4, 5 and 6) 6 = Very good; satisfies criteria in all areas. 5 = Good; satisfies criteria in almost all areas. 4 = Adequate; on balance, satisfies criteria; does not fail in any major area. Less than satisfactory (1, 2 and 3) 3 = Less than adequate; on balance does not satisfy criteria and/or in at least one major area. 2 = Poor; does not satisfy criteria in major areas. 1 = Very poor; does not satisfy criteria in many major area.
vietnam-appr-2016-17.docx