national appellate body within the relevant provisions of the Code.] 13.2.2.1 Hearings before the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel 13.2.2.1.1 [Insert a detailed composition of the Appeal Panel]. 13.2.2.1.2 The appointed members shall have had no prior involvement with any aspect of the case. In particular, no member may have previously considered any TUE application or appeal involving the same Athlete as in the current case. Each member, upon appointment, shall disclose to the Chair any circumstances likely to affect impartiality with respect to any of the parties. 13.2.2.1.3 If a member appointed by the Chair to hear a case is unwilling or unable, for whatever reason, to hear the case, the Chair may appoint a replacement or appoint a new hearing panel (e.g., from a pre-established pool of candidates). 13.2.2.1.4 The National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel has the power, at its absolute discretion, to appoint an expert to assist or advise the panel as required by the panel. 13.2.2.1.5 [NADO] has the right to join proceedings and attend hearings of the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel as a party. 13.2.2.1.6 The International Federation and/or the National Federation concerned, if not a party to the proceedings, the National Olympic Committee, if not a party to the proceedings, and WADA each have the right to attend hearings of the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel as an observer. 13.2.2.1.7 Hearings pursuant to this Article should be completed expeditiously and in all cases within three months of the date of the decision of the Doping Hearing Panel, save where exceptional circumstances apply. 13.2.2.1.8 Hearings held in connection with Events may be conducted on an expedited basis. 13.2.2.2 Proceedings of the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel
national appellate body within the relevant provisions of the Code.] 13.2.2.1 Hearings before the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel 13.2.2.1.1 [Insert a detailed composition of the Appeal Panel]. 13.2.2.1.2 The appointed members shall have had no prior involvement with any aspect of the case. In particular, no member may have previously considered any TUE application or appeal involving the same Athlete as in the current case. Each member, upon appointment, shall disclose to the Chair any circumstances likely to affect impartiality with respect to any of the parties. 13.2.2.1.3 If a member appointed by the Chair to hear a case is unwilling or unable, for whatever reason, to hear the case, the Chair may appoint a replacement or appoint a new hearing panel (e.g., from a pre-established pool of candidates). 13.2.2.1.4 The National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel has the power, at its absolute discretion, to appoint an expert to assist or advise the panel as required by the panel. 13.2.2.1.5 [NADO] has the right to join proceedings and attend hearings of the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel as a party. 13.2.2.1.6 The International Federation and/or the National Federation concerned, if not a party to the proceedings, the National Olympic Committee, if not a party to the proceedings, and WADA each have the right to attend hearings of the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel as an observer. 13.2.2.1.7 Hearings pursuant to this Article should be completed expeditiously and in all cases within three months of the date of the decision of the Doping Hearing Panel, save where exceptional circumstances apply. 13.2.2.1.8 Hearings held in connection with Events may be conducted on an expedited basis. 13.2.2.2 Proceedings of the National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel
WADA-2015-NADO-Model-Rules-v3.0-EN.docx