Met Standard N/A 23 31 Percentage Met -- 92% 97% Spring 2015-Fall 2015 Assessment Data Semester Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Summer I Summer I Distance Ed 2015 2015 only Traditional Distance Ed EE2 Academically Count Not offered 19 4 32 & Intellectually Gifted Add-on 2.16 2.75 2.19 Average 84.21% 100% 90.63% % Met Expectations (2 or 3) 3 0 3 # of Candidates Scoring a 1 % of Candidates Scoring a 1 15.79% 0.00% 9.38% 10 1 20 # of Candidates Scoring a 2 3.b.1.: Written % of Candidates Scoring a 2 52.63% 25.00% 62.50% Expression 6 3 9 # of Candidates Scoring a 3 31.58% 75.00% 28.13% % of Candidates Scoring a 3 2.42 2.75 2.56 Average 100% 100% 96.88% % Met Expectations (2 or 3) 0 0 1 # of Candidates Scoring a 1 0.00% 0.00% 3.13% % of Candidates Scoring a 1 Topic 11 1 12 # of Candidates Scoring a 2 % of Candidates Scoring a 2 57.89% 25.00% 37.50% 8 3 19 # of Candidates Scoring a 3 42.11% 75.00% 59.38% % of Candidates Scoring a 3 2.58 2.25 2.44 Average 100% 100% 93.75% % Met Expectations (2 or 3) 0 0 2 # of Candidates Scoring a 1 0.00% 0.00% 6.25% % of Candidates Scoring a 1 8 3 14 # of Candidates Scoring a 2 Content % of Candidates Scoring a 2 42.11% 75.00% 43.75% 11 1 16 # of Candidates Scoring a 3 57.89% 25.00% 50.00% % of Candidates Scoring a 3 2.89 2.50 2.31 Average 100% 100% 90.63% % Met Expectations (2 or 3) # of Candidates Scoring a 1 0 0 3 0.00% 0.00% 9.38% % of Candidates Scoring a 1 Reflection 2 2 16 # of Candidates Scoring a 2 % of Candidates Scoring a 2 10.53% 50.00% 50.00% 17 2 13 # of Candidates Scoring a 3 89.47% 50.00% 40.63% % of Candidates Scoring a 3 2.58 2.00 2.06 Average
Met Standard N/A 23 31 Percentage Met -- 92% 97% Spring 2015-Fall 2015 Assessment Data Semester Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Distance Ed only Summer I 2015 Traditional Summer I 2015 Distance Ed EE2 Academically & Intellectually Gifted Add-on Count Not offered 19 4 32 3.b.1.: Written Expression Average 2.16 2.75 2.19 % Met Expectations (2 or 3) 84.21% 100% 90.63% # of Candidates Scoring a 1 3 0 3 % of Candidates Scoring a 1 15.79% 0.00% 9.38% # of Candidates Scoring a 2 10 1 20 % of Candidates Scoring a 2 52.63% 25.00% 62.50% # of Candidates Scoring a 3 6 3 9 % of Candidates Scoring a 3 31.58% 75.00% 28.13% Topic Average 2.42 2.75 2.56 % Met Expectations (2 or 3) 100% 100% 96.88% # of Candidates Scoring a 1 0 0 1 % of Candidates Scoring a 1 0.00% 0.00% 3.13% # of Candidates Scoring a 2 11 1 12 % of Candidates Scoring a 2 57.89% 25.00% 37.50% # of Candidates Scoring a 3 8 3 19 % of Candidates Scoring a 3 42.11% 75.00% 59.38% Content Average 2.58 2.25 2.44 % Met Expectations (2 or 3) 100% 100% 93.75% # of Candidates Scoring a 1 0 0 2 % of Candidates Scoring a 1 0.00% 0.00% 6.25% # of Candidates Scoring a 2 8 3 14 % of Candidates Scoring a 2 42.11% 75.00% 43.75% # of Candidates Scoring a 3 11 1 16 % of Candidates Scoring a 3 57.89% 25.00% 50.00% Reflection Average 2.89 2.50 2.31 % Met Expectations (2 or 3) 100% 100% 90.63% # of Candidates Scoring a 1 0 0 3 % of Candidates Scoring a 1 0.00% 0.00% 9.38% # of Candidates Scoring a 2 2 2 16 % of Candidates Scoring a 2 10.53% 50.00% 50.00% # of Candidates Scoring a 3 17 2 13 % of Candidates Scoring a 3 89.47% 50.00% 40.63% Average 2.58 2.00 2.06
2015-16_SPCD_SPED_AIG_GradCert_SACS_Report_FINAL.docx