History 6 /7 Written Contribution for Essential Question Essay Rubric Purpose: To quantify individual’s effort to contribute to the team Essential Question Essay (20 points) Individual Contribution A B C D F essay Percentage of primary and secondary 40% + 39% - 33% 32% - 26% 25% - 20% 19% or less sources cited (10) Word Count 500+ 499 450 449 400 399 350 Less than 350 – – – (10) Score: /20 Primary and Secondary Sources Analysis and Glossing Rubric Purpose: To evaluate individual’s efforts to critically think about provided sources (20 points) Historical documents A B C D F packet Percentage of documents 66% + 65% - 60% 59% - 55% 54% - 50% Less than 50% analyzed and glossed (10) Highlighting Highlighting Highlighting and glossing Highlighting and glossing of and glossing of Highlighting and of required and glossing of sources sources glossing of sources sources indicate indicate sources indicate VERY indicate indicate POOR Quality of GOOD AVERAGE ALMOST NO analytical EXCELLENT analyzing, analytical analytical analytical analytical thinking and glossing/ thinking and thinking and thinking and thinking and understanding annotating understanding understanding understanding understanding and use of of packet and use of and use of and use of and use of Stanford sources (10) Stanford Stanford Stanford Stanford Historical Historical Historical Historical Historical Thinking Thinking Thinking Thinking Skills Thinking Skills Skills Skills Skills Score: / 20
History 6 /7 Written Contribution for Essential Question Essay Rubric Purpose: To quantify individual’s effort to contribute to the team Essential Question Essay (20 points) Individual Contribution essay A B C D F Percentage of primary and secondary sources cited (10) 40% + 39% - 33% 32% - 26% 25% - 20% 19% or less Word Count (10) 500+ 499 – 450 449 – 400 399 – 350 Less than 350 Score: /20 Primary and Secondary Sources Analysis and Glossing Rubric Purpose: To evaluate individual’s efforts to critically think about provided sources (20 points) Historical documents packet A B C D F Percentage of documents analyzed and glossed (10) 66% + 65% - 60% 59% - 55% 54% - 50% Less than 50% Quality of analyzing, glossing/ annotating of packet sources (10) Highlighting and glossing of required sources indicate EXCELLENT analytical thinking and understanding and use of Stanford Historical Thinking Skills Highlighting and glossing of sources indicate VERY GOOD analytical thinking and understanding and use of Stanford Historical Thinking Skills Highlighting and glossing of sources indicate AVERAGE analytical thinking and understanding and use of Stanford Historical Thinking Skills Highlighting and glossing of sources indicate POOR analytical thinking and understanding and use of Stanford Historical Thinking Skills Highlighting and glossing of sources indicate ALMOST NO analytical thinking and understanding and use of Stanford Historical Thinking Skills Score: / 20
Written-contribution-and-Source-analysis-and-glossing-rubrics-revised-11-1-18-Copy.docx