Nb Name of product Type of Scale of Detailed information Source of detailed Used in 2012 product information* displayed information and reports? aggregation rule 1 Priority Table MS Number of surface water Aggregation of It was not possible Substances bodies in which each information reported at to produce causing failure of Priority Substance causes water body level. (reporting of good chemical failure of good chemical individual Priority status in surface status. Substances was water bodies optional). 2 Percentage of Map/ MS Percentage of surface Aggregation of It was not possible surface water Chart water bodies failing good information reported at to produce a bodies failing chemical status by water body level complete picture good chemical Category. because of large status percentages of water bodies in unknown status. 3 Percentage of Chart EU Percentage of surface Aggregation on the Yes rivers, lakes, water bodies by chemical basis of the information groundwater, status class, by Category. reported at water body transitional and level. coastal waters of good, poor and unknown chemical status 4 Chemical status Chart MS Percentage of river and Aggregation on the Yes of rivers and lake water bodies of poor basis of the information lakes and good chemical status. reported at water body level – water bodies with unknown status not included. 5 Chemical status Map RBD Percentage of river and Aggregation on the Yes of rivers and lake water bodies failing basis of the information lakes to achieve good chemical reported at water body status. level – water bodies with unknown status not included. 6 Chemical status Chart MS Percentage of transitional Aggregation on the Yes of transitional and coastal water bodies basis of the information and coastal water in poor and good reported at water body bodies chemical status. level – water bodies with unknown status not included. 7 Chemical status Map RBD Percentage of Aggregation on the Yes of transitional, transitional, coastal and basis of the information coastal and territorial water bodies reported at water body territorial water failing to achieve good level – water bodies bodies chemical status. with unknown status not included. 8 Aggregation Table MS/ RBD/SU Number and size Aggregation on the Yes tables: Ecological (length/area) of chemical basis of the information and chemical status of surface water reported at water body status of surface bodies by Category. level. water bodies 9 Progress in Map/ MS/ RBD/SU Percentage of surface Aggregation on the Not relevant in 2010 achieving good Chart/ water bodies which have basis of the information reporting status since the Table achieved good chemical reported at water body first RBMPs. status since the first level. RBMPs.
Nb Name of product Type of product Scale of information* Detailed information displayed Source of detailed information and aggregation rule Used in 2012 reports? 1 Priority Substances causing failure of good chemical status in surface water bodies Table MS Number of surface water bodies in which each Priority Substance causes failure of good chemical status. Aggregation of information reported at water body level. It was not possible to produce (reporting of individual Priority Substances was optional). 2 Percentage of surface water bodies failing good chemical status Map/ Chart MS Percentage of surface water bodies failing good chemical status by Category. Aggregation of information reported at water body level It was not possible to produce a complete picture because of large percentages of water bodies in unknown status. 3 Percentage of rivers, lakes, groundwater, transitional and coastal waters of good, poor and unknown chemical status Chart EU Percentage of surface water bodies by chemical status class, by Category. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. Yes 4 Chemical status of rivers and lakes Chart MS Percentage of river and lake water bodies of poor and good chemical status. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level – water bodies with unknown status not included. Yes 5 Chemical status of rivers and lakes Map RBD Percentage of river and lake water bodies failing to achieve good chemical status. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level – water bodies with unknown status not included. Yes 6 Chemical status of transitional and coastal water bodies Chart MS Percentage of transitional and coastal water bodies in poor and good chemical status. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level – water bodies with unknown status not included. Yes 7 Chemical status of transitional, coastal and territorial water bodies Map RBD Percentage of transitional, coastal and territorial water bodies failing to achieve good chemical status. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level – water bodies with unknown status not included. Yes 8 Aggregation tables: Ecological and chemical status of surface water bodies Table MS/ RBD/SU Number and size (length/area) of chemical status of surface water bodies by Category. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. Yes 9 Progress in achieving good status since the first RBMPs. Map/ Chart/ Table MS/ RBD/SU Percentage of surface water bodies which have achieved good chemical status since the first RBMPs. Aggregation on the basis of the information reported at water body level. Not relevant in 2010 reporting
WFD_ReportingGuidance.docx