- Answers are supported by - Answers are justified with observations from data and supporting arguments in a logical student knowledge. order. (8 points) - Answers use acceptable style and grammar (no errors). (2 points) Adequate - Most answers are accurate and - Some answers incomplete or complete. tangentially related to question. - Most answers are supported by - Some explanations missing or observations from data and unclear. student knowledge. - Minor issues (1-2) with - Minor misconceptions or grammar/style. misunderstandings. (1 point) (6-7 points) Needs improvement - Answers are inaccurate or - Answers do not address the incomplete. question asked. - Answers are not supported by - Justification absent or unclear. observations from data and - Answers do not use acceptable student knowledge. and grammar. (5-0 points) (0 points) Annotated map/cross section rubric (specialty group task 2) Level of achievement Content/Comprehension Communication/ Presentation Exemplary - Atmospheric circulation patterns are - Map and cross section accurately sketched in map and are neatly drawn and section views. clearly labeled. - Annotations clearly relate wind patterns (2 points) to radiation excess/deficit and heat transport. (8 points) Adequate - Major atmospheric circulation patterns - Map and cross section are sketched in map and cross section lack some detail or is not views, but features may be imprecisely clearly labeled. located (within ~10%) and/or missing (1 point) minor details. - Annotations relate wind patterns to radiation excess/deficit and heat transport, but some features may be missing or incorrectly attributed. (6-7 points) Needs improvement - Major atmospheric circulation patterns - Map and cross section are imprecisely or inaccurately plotted. lack detail or are - Annotations relating wind patterns to uninterpretable. radiation excess/deficit and heat transport (0 points) are incorrectly identified/labeled. (5-0 points)
- Answers are supported by observations from data and student knowledge. (8 points) - Answers are justified with supporting arguments in a logical order. - Answers use acceptable style and grammar (no errors). (2 points) Adequate - Most answers are accurate and complete. - Most answers are supported by observations from data and student knowledge. - Minor misconceptions or misunderstandings. (6-7 points) - Some answers incomplete or tangentially related to question. - Some explanations missing or unclear. - Minor issues (1-2) with grammar/style. (1 point) Needs improvement - Answers are inaccurate or incomplete. - Answers are not supported by observations from data and student knowledge. (5-0 points) - Answers do not address the question asked. - Justification absent or unclear. - Answers do not use acceptable and grammar. (0 points) Annotated map/cross section rubric (specialty group task 2) Level of achievement Content/Comprehension Communication/ Presentation Exemplary - Atmospheric circulation patterns are accurately sketched in map and section views. - Annotations clearly relate wind patterns to radiation excess/deficit and heat transport. (8 points) - Map and cross section are neatly drawn and clearly labeled. (2 points) Adequate - Major atmospheric circulation patterns are sketched in map and cross section views, but features may be imprecisely located (within ~10%) and/or missing minor details. - Annotations relate wind patterns to radiation excess/deficit and heat transport, but some features may be missing or incorrectly attributed. (6-7 points) - Map and cross section lack some detail or is not clearly labeled. (1 point) Needs improvement - Major atmospheric circulation patterns are imprecisely or inaccurately plotted. - Annotations relating wind patterns to radiation excess/deficit and heat transport are incorrectly identified/labeled. (5-0 points) - Map and cross section lack detail or are uninterpretable. (0 points)
worksheet_answer_key_rubrics.v3.docx