commodity unmarketable, or for confusion is due to a translation reasons of economy or logistics, problem). another fumigant or treatment may be included in the treatment schedule. 418 70 Cuando no se pueda alcanzar el Panama Changes not supported: nivel de eficacia requerido con un Mejor comprensión del texto y en concordancia con Regarding the proposed único fumigante sin que el producto toda la norma. deletion of treatment”: see “or se vuelva no comerciable, o por Category : TECHNICAL the explanations in paragraph razones económicas o logísticas, 72 of the standard. podrá incluirse otro fumigante o is not redundant “Treatment” tratamiento en el protocolo de with in this case, “fumigant” tratamientofumigación. because section 4.2 refers to combination with other treatments, and not only to combination with other fumigants. schedule” is a “Treatment Glossary term (see comment 9, third paragraph). TPG TPG proposal (TPG 9): TPG proposal (TPG 9): 9 71 4.2.1 Sequential combination TPG suggested to delete treatments 4.2.2 Concurrent because redundant with 73 “combination” combination treatments the title of section 4.2 (see comment 404). 427 72 Another treatment may be applied Peru The TPG did not support the immediately before or after Changes suggested for consistency and better change from to “effectiveness” fumigation after a single fumigant understanding of the text, and also to clarify that as what is indeed “efficacy” treatment to increase the in general fumigation treatments are applied meant here is the increased effectiveness efficacy of the entire before temperature treatments effectiveness of the treatment, treatment. For example, not the efficacy, which is Category : TECHNICAL temperature single and temperature established at the moment of fumigant treatments applied research (efficacy under ideal sequentially may be necessary conditions). The efficacy is
commodity unmarketable, or for reasons of economy or logistics, another fumigant or treatment may be included in the treatment schedule. confusion is due to a translation problem). 418 70 Cuando no se pueda alcanzar el nivel de eficacia requerido con un único fumigante sin que el producto se vuelva no comerciable, o por razones económicas o logísticas, podrá incluirse otro fumigante o tratamiento en el protocolo de tratamientofumigación. Panama Mejor comprensión del texto y en concordancia con toda la norma. Category : TECHNICAL Changes not supported: Regarding the proposed deletion of “or treatment”: see the explanations in paragraph 72 of the standard. “Treatment” is not redundant with “fumigant” in this case, because section 4.2 refers to combination with other treatments, and not only to combination with other fumigants. “Treatment schedule” is a Glossary term (see comment 9, third paragraph). TPG 9 71 73 TPG proposal (TPG 9): 4.2.1 Sequential combination treatments 4.2.2 Concurrent combination treatments TPG proposal (TPG 9): TPG suggested to delete “combination” because redundant with the title of section 4.2 (see comment 404). 427 72 Another treatment may be applied immediately before or after fumigation after a single fumigant treatment to increase the effectiveness efficacy of the entire treatment. For example, temperature single and temperature fumigant treatments applied sequentially may be necessary Peru Changes suggested for consistency and better understanding of the text, and also to clarify that in general fumigation treatments are applied before temperature treatments Category : TECHNICAL The TPG did not support the change from “effectiveness” to “efficacy” as what is indeed meant here is the increased effectiveness of the treatment, not the efficacy, which is established at the moment of research (efficacy under ideal conditions). The efficacy is
TPG_Recommendations_2014-004_CompiledComments_DraftISPM_RequirementsFumigation_2018-01-02_oK0EVMO.docx