Performance Outcome: Identify the percentage of students assessed that should be able to demonstrate proficiency in this student learning outcome and the of proficiency expected. Example: 80% of the students assessed will a copy of the scoring achieve a score of or higher on the Oral Presentation Scoring Rubric. (Note: “acceptable” rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, is to be submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive.) The program expects 90% of its students to earn at least Level 2 on Elements 1 and 3 of the Mentorship Project (out of 3 levels). Assessment Data: NOTE: our data sources have changed; therefore will be two tables here one for Spring – 2014 data, and one for Spring 2015-Fall 2015 data. Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data Assessment Data Fall 2014 Summer 2014 Spring 2014 Count 0 4 7 TTLP Project from Count at Level 1 0 0 ELED 6311 % at Level 1 0% 0% Element 1: Research Count at Level 2 3 5 Based Tasks 75% 71.4% % at Level 2 Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% TTLP Project from Count at Level 1 0 0 ELED 6311 % at Level 1 0% 0% Element 2: Planned Count at Level 2 3 5 Pedagogies % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% TTLP Project from 0 0 Count at Level 1 ELED 6311 % at Level 1 0% 0% Element 3: Analysis of Count at Level 2 3 5 Student Work % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% TTLP Project from Count at Level 1 0 0 ELED 6311 % at Level 1 0% 0% Element 4: Reflection 3 5 at Level 2 % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% Spring 2015-Fall 2015 Assessment Data Distance Education ONLY Assessment Data Fall 2015 Spring 2015 Count 0 0 Mentorship Project from ELED 6316 Count at Level 1
Performance Outcome: Identify the percentage of students assessed that should be able to demonstrate proficiency in this student learning outcome and the of proficiency expected. Example: 80% of the students assessed will achieve a score of “acceptable” or higher on the Oral Presentation Scoring Rubric. (Note: a copy of the scoring rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, is to be submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive.) The program expects 90% of its students to earn at least Level 2 on Elements 1 and 3 of the Mentorship Project (out of 3 levels). Assessment Data: NOTE: our data sources have changed; therefore will be two tables here – one for Spring 2014 data, and one for Spring 2015-Fall 2015 data. Spring 2014-Fall 2014 Assessment Data Assessment Data Fall 2014 Summer 2014 Spring 2014 Count 0 4 7 TTLP Project from ELED 6311 Element 1: Research Based Tasks Count at Level 1 0 0 % at Level 1 0% 0% Count at Level 2 3 5 % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% TTLP Project from ELED 6311 Element 2: Planned Pedagogies Count at Level 1 0 0 % at Level 1 0% 0% Count at Level 2 3 5 % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% TTLP Project from ELED 6311 Element 3: Analysis of Student Work Count at Level 1 0 0 % at Level 1 0% 0% Count at Level 2 3 5 % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% TTLP Project from ELED 6311 Element 4: Reflection Count at Level 1 0 0 % at Level 1 0% 0% at Level 2 3 5 % at Level 2 75% 71.4% Count at Level 3 1 2 % at Level 3 25% 28.6% Spring 2015-Fall 2015 Assessment Data Distance Education ONLY Assessment Data Fall 2015 Spring 2015 Count 0 0 Mentorship Project from ELED 6316 Count at Level 1
2015-16%20Annual%20Report%20REEL.docx