INT-001-3 R2.1. If a Purchasing-Selling Entity is not involved The Sink Balancing The Sink Balancing The Sink Balancing The Sink Balancing in the Interchange, such as delivery from a Authority experienced Authority Authority experienced Authority experienced jointly owned generator. one instance of failing experienced two three instances of four instances of to ensure that instances of failing failing to ensure that failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange to ensure that Arranged Interchange Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Arranged was submitted to the was submitted to the Interchange Authority Interchange was Interchange Authority if Interchange Authority if a Purchasing-Selling submitted to the a Purchasing-Selling if a Purchasing-Selling Entity was not Interchange Entity was not involved Entity was not involved in the Authority if a in the Interchange, such involved in the Interchange, such as Purchasing-Selling as delivery from a Interchange, such as delivery from a jointly Entity was not jointly owned delivery from a jointly owned generator. involved in the generator. owned generator. Interchange, such as delivery from a jointly owned generator. INT-001-3 R2.2. For each bilateral Inadvertent Interchange The Sink Balancing The Sink Balancing The Sink Balancing The Sink Balancing payback. Authority experienced Authority Authority experienced Authority experienced one instance of failing experienced two three instances of four instances of to ensure that instances of failing failing to ensure that failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange to ensure that Arranged Interchange Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Arranged was submitted to the was submitted to the Interchange Authority Interchange was Interchange Authority Interchange Authority for each bilateral submitted to the for each bilateral for each bilateral Inadvertent Interchange Inadvertent Interchange Inadvertent Interchange payback. Authority for each payback. Interchange payback. bilateral Inadvertent Interchange payback. INT-003-3 R1. Each Receiving Balancing Authority shall There shall be a There shall be a There shall be a There shall be a confirm Interchange Schedules with the separate Lower VSL, separate Moderate separate High VSL, if separate Severe VSL, Sending Balancing Authority prior to if either of the VSL, if either of the either of the following if either of the implementation in the Balancing following conditions following conditions conditions exists: Three following conditions Authority’s ACE equation. exists: One instance of exists: Two instances of entering a exists: Four or more entering a schedule instances of entering schedule into its ACE instances of entering a into its ACE equation a schedule into its equation without schedule into its ACE without confirming the ACE equation confirming the schedule equation without
INT-001-3 R2.1. If a Purchasing-Selling Entity is not involved in the Interchange, such as delivery from a jointly owned generator. The Sink Balancing Authority experienced one instance of failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Interchange Authority if a Purchasing-Selling Entity was not involved in the Interchange, such as delivery from a jointly owned generator. The Sink Balancing Authority experienced two instances of failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Interchange Authority if a Purchasing-Selling Entity was not involved in the Interchange, such as delivery from a jointly owned generator. The Sink Balancing Authority experienced three instances of failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Interchange Authority if a Purchasing-Selling Entity was not involved in the Interchange, such as delivery from a jointly owned generator. The Sink Balancing Authority experienced four instances of failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Interchange Authority if a Purchasing-Selling Entity was not involved in the Interchange, such as delivery from a jointly owned generator. INT-001-3 R2.2. For each bilateral Inadvertent Interchange payback. The Sink Balancing Authority experienced one instance of failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Interchange Authority for each bilateral Inadvertent Interchange payback. The Sink Balancing Authority experienced two instances of failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Interchange Authority for each bilateral Inadvertent Interchange payback. The Sink Balancing Authority experienced three instances of failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Interchange Authority for each bilateral Inadvertent Interchange payback. The Sink Balancing Authority experienced four instances of failing to ensure that Arranged Interchange was submitted to the Interchange Authority for each bilateral Inadvertent Interchange payback. INT-003-3 R1. Each Receiving Balancing Authority shall confirm Interchange Schedules with the Sending Balancing Authority prior to implementation in the Balancing Authority’s ACE equation. There shall be a separate Lower VSL, if either of the following conditions exists: One instance of entering a schedule into its ACE equation without confirming the There shall be a separate Moderate VSL, if either of the following conditions exists: Two instances of entering a schedule into its ACE equation There shall be a separate High VSL, if either of the following conditions exists: Three instances of entering a schedule into its ACE equation without confirming the schedule There shall be a separate Severe VSL, if either of the following conditions exists: Four or more instances of entering a schedule into its ACE equation without
VSL_Matrix_Complete_2016_01_27.docx