References English Sources: Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stock, D. (1960). New York: The American Voter. Wiley. Dilliplane, S., Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2012). Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, Jimenez, G. C. (2009). (First edition). Red Genes, Blue Genes: Exposing Political Irrationality Brooklyn, N.Y.: Autonomedia. Johnston, R. (2006). Party identification: Unmoved mover or sum of preferences? Annual Review 329–351. of Political Science, 9, Kim, Y.-M., Wang, M., Gotlieb, M. R., Gabay, I., & Edgerly, S. (2013). Ambivalence reduction and polarization in the campaign information environment: the interaction between individual- and contextual-level influences. 388–416. Communication Research, 40(3), http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211431884 Kleinnijenhuis, J., van Hoof, A. M. J., & Oegema, D. (2006). Negative news and the sleeper effect of distrust. 86–104. Harvard International Journal of 11(2), Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. 129–156. Political Psychology, 35(1), Magleby, D. B., & Nelson, C. (2012). Independent leaners as policy partisans: An examination of party identification and policy views. Forum-a Journal of Applied Research in 6. http://doi.org/10.1515/1540-8884.1522 Contemporary Politics, 10(3), Miller, A. H., & Wattenberg, M. P. (1983). Measuring party identification: Independent or no partisan preference? 106–121. American Journal of Political Science, 27(1), Petrocik, J. R. (1974). An analysis of intransitivities in the of party identification. Political 31–47. Methodology, 1(3), Figure 1: Research Design and
References English Sources: Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stock, D. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley. Dilliplane, S., Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2012). Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, Jimenez, G. C. (2009). Red Genes, Blue Genes: Exposing Political Irrationality (First edition). Brooklyn, N.Y.: Autonomedia. Johnston, R. (2006). Party identification: Unmoved mover or sum of preferences? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 329–351. Kim, Y.-M., Wang, M., Gotlieb, M. R., Gabay, I., & Edgerly, S. (2013). Ambivalence reduction and polarization in the campaign information environment: the interaction between individual- and contextual-level influences. Communication Research, 40(3), 388–416. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211431884 Kleinnijenhuis, J., van Hoof, A. M. J., & Oegema, D. (2006). Negative news and the sleeper effect of distrust. Harvard International Journal of 11(2), 86–104. Leeper, T. J., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Political Psychology, 35(1), 129–156. Magleby, D. B., & Nelson, C. (2012). Independent leaners as policy partisans: An examination of party identification and policy views. Forum-a Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics, 10(3), 6. http://doi.org/10.1515/1540-8884.1522 Miller, A. H., & Wattenberg, M. P. (1983). Measuring party identification: Independent or no partisan preference? American Journal of Political Science, 27(1), 106–121. Petrocik, J. R. (1974). An analysis of intransitivities in the of party identification. Political Methodology, 1(3), 31–47. Figure 1: Research Design and
WPSA2015_ProbingforClosetPartisans.docx