Technical Evaluation Maximum Points by Score (Maximum 100 Points) Category 1. The number of housing units proposed for households of the lowest income levels, and 20 the size of those units. 2. The affordability of housing (rent and utilities) for the low-income occupants, and 20 the length of affordability. 3. The project’s financing, including methods of other financing, and the plan to 20 applicant’s repay the investment. City’s 4. The location (i.e., proximity to project’s public transportation, major employers, full service grocery, schools, and medical 15 services; distance from other affordable housing). 5. The qualifications and applicant’s 10 experience in the affordable housing field. 6. The physical appearance and project’s attractiveness and its cohesion to the 10 surrounding neighborhood 7. The target occupants (i.e. working project’s poor, families, seniors, persons with 5 disabilities). Total:
Technical Evaluation (Maximum 100 Points) Maximum Points by Category Score 1. The number of housing units proposed for households of the lowest income levels, and the size of those units. 20 2. The affordability of housing (rent and utilities) for the low-income occupants, and the length of affordability. 20 3. The project’s financing, including methods of other financing, and the applicant’s plan to repay the City’s investment. 20 4. The project’s location (i.e., proximity to public transportation, major employers, full service grocery, schools, and medical services; distance from other affordable housing). 15 5. The applicant’s qualifications and experience in the affordable housing field. 10 6. The project’s physical appearance and attractiveness and its cohesion to the surrounding neighborhood 10 7. The project’s target occupants (i.e. working poor, families, seniors, persons with disabilities). 5 Total:
2015ApplicationMulti-UnitDevelopment.docx