Table 2: Progress against Key Indicators INDICATOR DESCRIPTION LEVEL RELATED GOAL RESULT COMMENT AND IMPLICATIONS Comment: Significant growth in allocations as proportion Public expenditure on education as KPI 1 of national expenditure, from 12% 2001 (12%) to 20% by percentage of total public Government Share of public National Positive 2013. expenditure (covers MoEC and commitment expenditure Implications: Stable growth in education financing is MoRA expenditure) positive for further investment. KPI 2 Public expenditure on education as Government Comment: Education expenditure, as a proportion of National Positive Share of GDP percentage of GDP commitment GDP, increased from 3.3% in 2011 to 3.7% in 2013. Comment: Non-salary share of expenditures in 2011 increased to 25% of total district level expenditures (up KPI 3 % share of education budget from 13% in 2010). Share of non-salary National Quality Positive spending on non-salary costs. Implications: Growth in budget is not being solely resources consumed by salaries. New budget allocations were especially strong for capital items. Comment: The strong increase in the education share of district budgets in 2011 was reversed in last 2 years 2012 KPI 4 Government Education as % of total public and 2013, with the education share dropping to 34% from District commitment to District commitment Neutral expenditures 36%. education Equity/access Implications: Poorest districts with low allocations for education should be monitored Comment: Average growth in education allocations Annual % change in public KPI 5 improved for poorest districts and fewer poorest expenditures for education in Annual growth in districts allocating less than 15% of the budget for lowest quintile districts compared District Equity/access Positive spending in the poorest education. to national % change in public districts Implications: Papua accounts for the majority of poorest expenditure for education districts with contracting budget allocations in 2013. KPI 6 Public expenditure from APBD Government Comment: Average expenditure per student across the Average district divided by number of school District commitment Positive country grew in 2013 at a reasonable rate. expenditure per student students Quality
Table 2: Progress against Key Indicators INDICATOR DESCRIPTION LEVEL RELATED GOAL RESULT COMMENT AND IMPLICATIONS KPI 1 Share of public expenditure Public expenditure on education as percentage of total public expenditure (covers MoEC and MoRA expenditure) National Government commitment Positive Comment: Significant growth in allocations as proportion of national expenditure, from 12% 2001 (12%) to 20% by 2013. Implications: Stable growth in education financing is positive for further investment. KPI 2 Share of GDP Public expenditure on education as percentage of GDP National Government commitment Positive Comment: Education expenditure, as a proportion of GDP, increased from 3.3% in 2011 to 3.7% in 2013. KPI 3 Share of non-salary resources % share of education budget spending on non-salary costs. National Quality Positive Comment: Non-salary share of expenditures in 2011 increased to 25% of total district level expenditures (up from 13% in 2010). Implications: Growth in budget is not being solely consumed by salaries. New budget allocations were especially strong for capital items. KPI 4 District commitment to education Education as % of total public expenditures District Government commitment Equity/access Neutral Comment: The strong increase in the education share of district budgets in 2011 was reversed in last 2 years 2012 and 2013, with the education share dropping to 34% from 36%. Implications: Poorest districts with low allocations for education should be monitored KPI 5 Annual growth in spending in the poorest districts Annual % change in public expenditures for education in lowest quintile districts compared to national % change in public expenditure for education District Equity/access Positive Comment: Average growth in education allocations improved for poorest districts and fewer poorest districts allocating less than 15% of the budget for education. Implications: Papua accounts for the majority of poorest districts with contracting budget allocations in 2013. KPI 6 Average district expenditure per student Public expenditure from APBD divided by number of school students District Government commitment Quality Positive Comment: Average expenditure per student across the country grew in 2013 at a reasonable rate.
2013-annual-review-of-indonesian-education-sector-financing.docx