National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: CYPRUS October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments 2 - Membership as not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 observer or full of member (2015) 2 - Participation 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2 level in past eight meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended 2 - Government No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 endorsement support of term perspective for endorsement participation 2 - Responsive to only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to Score Comments 2 - Data delivered none 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 in past five for just one year for two or years more years 2016) 2 - MDS data 2016 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 complete and 2 delivered expected in time 2 - Accuracy of more than 40% 0 between 10% 1 less than 10% 2 coding (most unknown and 40% unknown current unknown delivery) 2 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper 1 Reference 2 Reference or not for last population file population file for delivery for 2016 2016 has been sent but unfortunately data are inconsistent due to the fact that IDB admissions are under recording. 1 - Consistency of IR not available 0 not consistent or 1 Consistent 2 Complications case definition unclear and sequels of (IDB & HDR or medical EDR) interventions not excluded 2 Scope of data Two or more Just one No 2 “warning
National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: CYPRUS October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the eight meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 2 - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 2 - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 2 A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to Score Comments - Data delivered in past five years none 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 2 - MDS data 2016 delivered Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 complete and in time 2 2 - Accuracy of coding (most current delivery) more than 40% unknown 0 between 10% and 40% unknown 1 less than 10% unknown 2 2 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper or not for last delivery 1 Reference population file for 2016 2 2 Reference population file for 2016 has been sent but unfortunately data are inconsistent due to the fact that IDB admissions are under recording. - Consistency of case definition (IDB & HDR or EDR) IR not available 0 not consistent or unclear 1 Consistent 2 1 Complications and sequels of medical interventions not excluded Scope of data Two or more Just one No “warning 2 2 2016) participation
Sustainability%20Report.docx