Table 9: Component 3 scorecard DAC Criterion 2013 Justification Comments Most factors of Madrasah performance are covered in the EP Factors influencing Madrasah performance have design. been defined based on a preliminary analysis of Weak consideration/ focus on community engagement. Phase 2 activities. Relevance 4 Expected changes at systemic level are not well delineated. Block grant socialisation is thought to be instrumental in stimulating community engagement. Implementation is contracted to the SSQ managing contractor; The efficiency of the outsourcing model could be there are no substantial delays and disbursements are on track. examined as part of a VFM assessment. Efficiency 5 Efficiency of support could be increased through targeting madrasah with lower initial standards. Tangible and observable incremental gains are evident at Results of the BAN S/M accreditation process Madrasah level, including in some non-participating Madrasah. might soon highlight the extent of the Effectiveness 4 In the absence of clear systemic change, the EP benefits may be effectiveness of Madrasah support. restricted to individual Madrasah. It is still too early to confidently assess the impact of EP activities the first phase of – Impact TE support has just been finalised in December 2013. Lack of clarity about achievements and benefits to be sustained, With the of the second half of the EP period, and absence of strategy compounded by project modality. considerations about the sustainability of EP UPPAM mandate inconsistent with level of GoI resources. achievements and their benefits become crucial. Sustainability 2 Uncertainty about BAN-S/M resources and capacity to include Madrasah in the accreditation process beyond EP life. Table 10: Component 3 key findings and recommendations
Table 9: Component 3 scorecard DAC Criterion 2013 Justification Comments Relevance 4 Most factors of Madrasah performance are covered in the EP design. Weak consideration/ focus on community engagement. Expected changes at systemic level are not well delineated. Factors influencing Madrasah performance have been defined based on a preliminary analysis of Phase 2 activities. Block grant socialisation is thought to be instrumental in stimulating community engagement. Efficiency 5 Implementation is contracted to the SSQ managing contractor; there are no substantial delays and disbursements are on track. Efficiency of support could be increased through targeting madrasah with lower initial standards. The efficiency of the outsourcing model could be examined as part of a VFM assessment. Effectiveness 4 Tangible and observable incremental gains are evident at Madrasah level, including in some non-participating Madrasah. In the absence of clear systemic change, the EP benefits may be restricted to individual Madrasah. Results of the BAN S/M accreditation process might soon highlight the extent of the effectiveness of Madrasah support. Impact TE It is still too early to confidently assess the impact of EP activities – the first phase of support has just been finalised in December 2013. Sustainability 2 Lack of clarity about achievements and benefits to be sustained, and absence of strategy compounded by project modality. UPPAM mandate inconsistent with level of GoI resources. Uncertainty about BAN-S/M resources and capacity to include Madrasah in the accreditation process beyond EP life. With the of the second half of the EP period, considerations about the sustainability of EP achievements and their benefits become crucial. Table 10: Component 3 key findings and recommendations
2013-indonesia-education-annual-partnership-performance-report.docx