behaviour reduce negative impacts? Should the bar be lowered in terms of the type of behaviour that attracts a response from the justice system? Do jurisdictions need to make available a publicly searchable register of orders against vexatious litigants? In relation to vexatious claimants, QPILCH notes that prevention will always be better than cure. Identifying people with a genuine grievance and ensuring they have access to support, advice and guidance early in their dispute can significantly reduce the need for strong action later in the process. It is QPILCH’s view that the process currently in place in Queensland (detailed at pages 44 to 45 of QPILCH’s submissions) adequately deals with vexatious litigants. This process could be used as a framework for application in other jurisdictions.
behaviour reduce negative impacts? Should the bar be lowered in terms of the type of behaviour that attracts a response from the justice system? Do jurisdictions need to make available a publicly searchable register of orders against vexatious litigants? In relation to vexatious claimants, QPILCH notes that prevention will always be better than cure. Identifying people with a genuine grievance and ensuring they have access to support, advice and guidance early in their dispute can significantly reduce the need for strong action later in the process. It is QPILCH’s view that the process currently in place in Queensland (detailed at pages 44 to 45 of QPILCH’s submissions) adequately deals with vexatious litigants. This process could be used as a framework for application in other jurisdictions.
subdr247-access-justice.docx