Summary Excellent system regarding MDS. Main shortcoming is the lack of FDS data. Implementation Assessment Signatures Function Place, date Name Signature National IDB data OK for JAMIE final Tallinn Liis Roovali administrator score card June 2014 Vienna, 16 October BRIDGE-Health IDB Rupert Kisser OK 2015 National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: FINLAND August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as 2 not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 observer or full of member (2015) - Participation 1 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2 level in past seven meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended - Government 1 No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 endorsement support of term perspective for endorsement - Responsive to 2 only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 6 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered 2 none 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 Start 2010 in past five for just one year for two or years more years - MDS data 2014 2 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 complete and 2 delivered expected in time - Accuracy of 1 0 1 2 more than 40% between 10% less than 10% Tb checked (bias
Summary Implementation Assessment Excellent system regarding MDS. Main shortcoming is the lack of FDS data. Signatures Function Place, date Name Signature National IDB data administrator Tallinn Liis Roovali OK for JAMIE final score card June 2014 BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, 16 October 2015 Rupert Kisser OK National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: FINLAND August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the seven meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 1 - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 1 - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 2 A. Total score (max. 8) 6 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered in past five years none 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 2 Start 2010 - MDS data 2014 delivered Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 complete and in time 2 2 - Accuracy of more than 40% 0 between 10% 1 less than 10% 2 1 Tb checked (bias
Sustainability%20Report.docx