a manner allowing automated always suitable for download and processing automated processing (that is, registries containing PDF and MS Word/Excel documents instead of georeferenced data or databases exposed through web services) 2.2.1 Communication M Post-2020 MT (1) Short (1) Legal and administrative provisions (1) Legal and Legal and operational guarantees that (1), (2) MoEW Stakeholders to the respective 2.2 Improve communication and tools for funding (12.2021); are made to ensure that all mandatory administrative provisions discussions involving trade-offs assessment/ study/ management (3) Authorities and informed programs studies related to ecosystems on mandatory studies potentially harmful to BD&ES on all plan as per the relevant legal (2) Medium responsible for the understanding prioritization of (including EIA, strategic assessments, exist but are insufficiently policy levels are informed and framework State budget for (12.2025); respective of ecosystem research and management plans for species, ES&CCA oriented and in scientifically underpinned with regards co-financing assessment/ study/ (3) Short processes and practical action habitats, protected areas, and so on) some cases vaguely to possible declines in climate change and activities management plan, (12.2023) climate change assess short- and long-term impact on formulated (for example vulnerability, loss of regulating outside the and so on ecosystem condition—including carrying capacity is ecosystem services and societal costs as pressure funding critical natural capital, red lines and required to be estimated programs carrying capacity—and ecosystem but no definition is given) services with special attention to CCA (2) No requirement is (2) All mandatory studies related to made for the mandatory ecosystems (including EIA, strategic inclusion of assessments, management plans for scenarios species, habitats, protected areas, CBA (3) Public consultations for obtaining EU funding, and so on) and discussions often lack contain assessment of the climate objective information and projections and at least one end up as controversy on adaptation scenario calculated in trade-offs terms of business plan for adaptation related activities (3) Stakeholder scenario discussions and public consultations to contain discussion on scientific findings in the reports being discussed and/or from other sources (for example, produced through Activity 2.2.3) about the impact of proposed activities on the ecosystem condition and services. The adoption of scenarios to be documented in the proceedings when such discussions and consultations have legal consequences.
a manner allowing automated download and processing always suitable for automated processing (that is, registries containing PDF and MS Word/Excel documents instead of georeferenced data or databases exposed through web services) 2.2 Improve communication and understanding of ecosystem processes and climate change as pressure 2.2.1 Communication and tools for informed prioritization of research and practical action M Post-2020 funding programs State budget for co-financing and activities outside the funding programs MT (1) Short (12.2021); (2) Medium (12.2025); (3) Short (12.2023) (1) Legal and administrative provisions are made to ensure that all mandatory studies related to ecosystems (including EIA, strategic assessments, management plans for species, habitats, protected areas, and so on) assess short- and long-term impact on ecosystem condition—including critical natural capital, red lines and carrying capacity—and ecosystem services with special attention to CCA (2) All mandatory studies related to ecosystems (including EIA, strategic assessments, management plans for species, habitats, protected areas, CBA for obtaining EU funding, and so on) contain assessment of the climate projections and at least one adaptation scenario calculated in terms of business plan for adaptation related activities (3) Stakeholder scenario discussions and public consultations to contain discussion on scientific findings in the reports being discussed and/or from other sources (for example, produced through Activity 2.2.3) about the impact of proposed activities on the ecosystem condition and services. The adoption of scenarios to be documented in the proceedings when such discussions and consultations have legal consequences. (1) Legal and administrative provisions on mandatory studies exist but are insufficiently ES&CCA oriented and in some cases vaguely formulated (for example carrying capacity is required to be estimated but no definition is given) (2) No requirement is made for the mandatory inclusion of scenarios (3) Public consultations and discussions often lack objective information and end up as controversy on trade-offs Legal and operational guarantees that discussions involving trade-offs potentially harmful to BD&ES on all policy levels are informed and scientifically underpinned with regards to possible declines in climate change vulnerability, loss of regulating ecosystem services and societal costs (1), (2) MoEW (3) Authorities responsible for the respective assessment/ study/ management plan, and so on Stakeholders to the respective assessment/ study/ management plan as per the relevant legal framework
Strategy%20and%20Action%20Plan%20-%20Full%20Report%20-%20Final%20(2018-08-17)%20-%20EN%20-%20for%20printing53db03266cf20be99341fadbf5e9ed10.docx