Part 2: Will there be a positive impact on people with the Will there be a be a Justification of conclusion of Conclusion (e.g. Date when equality protected characteristics identified above? negative impact on analysis impact is positive, conclusion will be people with the go ahead; reviewed (e.g., in light of new protected negative impact, characteristics go ahead if information;change identified above? justified; negative in circumstances; at a policy review.) impact, don’t go ahead.) Yes, to the ultimate benefit of pupils attending RSS who No. Some schools Although some independent The changes are 2019, or an earlier have disabilities as proper regulation increases the attended by pupils of a schools with boarding to the ultimate date if the likelihood that they will be in schools which meet the specific faith or race, accommodation cater for pupils benefit of pupils NMS/NMS for RSS latest standards for RSS may be de-registered or with specific faiths, and indirectly attending are amended before have a relevant specific races, the impact on them independent that date The inmpact on pupils of a specific faith or race in restriction imposed as a is not particular compared with schools which schools will be regulated on the basis of the latest result of non-compliance those not sharing these protected have boarding version of the NMS, is to the ultimate benefit of the with the revised and characteritics. By contrast pupils accommodation or pupils, but this impact is not particular to them. updated NMS. But this with disabilities form the whole are RSS, and will not have a particular pupil cohort in RSS and will be should go ahead impact on those groups. particularly affected. There will be a particular impact on pupils with If de-registration or a restriction is disabilities attending imposed when a school is not RSS which are meeting the standards, any
Part 2: Will there be a positive impact on people with the protected characteristics identified above? Will there be a be a negative impact on people with the protected characteristics identified above? Justification of conclusion of analysis Conclusion (e.g. impact is positive, go ahead; negative impact, go ahead if justified; negative impact, don’t go ahead.) Date when equality conclusion will be reviewed (e.g., in light of new information;change in circumstances; at a policy review.) Yes, to the ultimate benefit of pupils attending RSS who have disabilities as proper regulation increases the likelihood that they will be in schools which meet the latest standards for RSS The inmpact on pupils of a specific faith or race in schools will be regulated on the basis of the latest version of the NMS, is to the ultimate benefit of the pupils, but this impact is not particular to them. No. Some schools attended by pupils of a specific faith or race, may be de-registered or have a relevant restriction imposed as a result of non-compliance with the revised and updated NMS. But this will not have a particular impact on those groups. There will be a particular impact on pupils with disabilities attending RSS which are Although some independent schools with boarding accommodation cater for pupils with specific faiths, and indirectly specific races, the impact on them is not particular compared with those not sharing these protected characteritics. By contrast pupils with disabilities form the whole pupil cohort in RSS and will be particularly affected. If de-registration or a restriction is imposed when a school is not meeting the standards, any The changes are to the ultimate benefit of pupils attending independent schools which have boarding accommodation or are RSS, and should go ahead 2019, or an earlier date if the NMS/NMS for RSS are amended before that date
TheEqualitiesLogBlankTemplateFeesRegsv4.0.docx