Family incidents with children 0.522 <.0001 73 0.755 <0.001 77 present Mental health 0.045 0.707 73 -0.079 0.495 77 care Psychological 0.460 <.0001 73 0.377 <0.001 77 stress Alcohol use 0.244 0.038 73 0.445 <.0001 77 Social support -0.329 0.005 73 -0.072 0.533 77 Safety 0.125 0.291 73 0.211 0.065 77 Notes *Pearsons Correlation co-efficient, **Spearman correlations coefficient Table 6.4: Relationships between the dependent variables and key risk factors, NSW: Correlation coefficients Correlation with Sig N Correlation with Sig N developmentally developmentally vulnerable on 2 vulnerable on 2 or more AEDC or more AEDC domains 2009* domains 2012* Domestic 0.501 <0.001 140 0.552 <0.001 140 violence Liquor 0.224 0.008 140 0.243 0.004 139 offence Mental health -0.198 0.015 151 -0.167 0.041 15 care plans Psychological 0.385 <0.001 150 0.376 <0.001 150 stress Alcohol use 0.153 0.060 150 0.091 0.270 150 Social -0.310 0.001 150 -0.368 0.001 150 support Safety -0.108 0.188 150 0.141 0.084 150 Notes *Pearsons Correlation co-efficient Figures 6.1 and 6.2 graph the data points for the LGAs in the relationship between the two dependent variables and the rate of family violence incidents with children present. The relationship between the rates of family violence and child protection outcomes is stronger than the relationship between family violence and child development outcomes. LGAs are classified as anomalous if they are below median on the outcome, and above median on the risk factor variable. Data points in the lower right-hand quadrant indicate LGAs with anomalous outcomes in that these LGAs report higher rates of the risk factor, but relatively low rates of poor outcomes on the AEDC. The LGAs located in the lower right-hand quadrant for both dependent variables in Figures 6.1 and 6.6 are reported in Table 6.5.
Family incidents with children present 0.522 <.0001 73 0.755 <0.001 77 Mental health care 0.045 0.707 73 -0.079 0.495 77 Psychological stress 0.460 <.0001 73 0.377 <0.001 77 Alcohol use 0.244 0.038 73 0.445 <.0001 77 Social support -0.329 0.005 73 -0.072 0.533 77 Safety 0.125 0.291 73 0.211 0.065 77 Notes *Pearsons Correlation co-efficient, **Spearman correlations coefficient Table 6.4: Relationships between the dependent variables and key risk factors, NSW: Correlation coefficients Correlation with developmentally vulnerable on 2 or more AEDC domains 2009* Sig N Correlation with developmentally vulnerable on 2 or more AEDC domains 2012* Sig N Domestic violence 0.501 <0.001 140 0.552 <0.001 140 Liquor offence 0.224 0.008 140 0.243 0.004 139 Mental health care plans -0.198 0.015 151 -0.167 0.041 15 Psychological stress 0.385 <0.001 150 0.376 <0.001 150 Alcohol use 0.153 0.060 150 0.091 0.270 150 Social support -0.310 0.001 150 -0.368 0.001 150 Safety -0.108 0.188 150 0.141 0.084 150 Notes *Pearsons Correlation co-efficient Figures 6.1 and 6.2 graph the data points for the LGAs in the relationship between the two dependent variables and the rate of family violence incidents with children present. The relationship between the rates of family violence and child protection outcomes is stronger than the relationship between family violence and child development outcomes. LGAs are classified as anomalous if they are below median on the outcome, and above median on the risk factor variable. Data points in the lower right-hand quadrant indicate LGAs with anomalous outcomes in that these LGAs report higher rates of the risk factor, but relatively low rates of poor outcomes on the AEDC. The LGAs located in the lower right-hand quadrant for both dependent variables in Figures 6.1 and 6.6 are reported in Table 6.5.
thriving_in_adversity_0.docx