hospitals validation check 2 - Hospital none or below 0 Hardly above 1 well above 2 sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) 2 FDS data none 0 Sample below 1 Sample above 2 minimum minimum expected expected (<3000) (3000+) C. Total score (max. 20) 19 D. Prospects for 2018+ Score Comments 2 - Will the MDS no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 data collection continue in 2018? 2 - Improvement None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no 2 Extension of or maintenance substantial sample planned plan in place improvements for next years? necessary 0 - Legal basis for No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 MDS data substantial very likely collection? discussion 2 - Capacities in Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay 1 Sufficient or 2 your the same will increase organization for injury data collection/ analysis? 2 - Interest to no 0 Yes, but 1 Yes, we 2 participate in depending on remain future EU injury availability of strongly information internal interested projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 8 Summary Excellent and sustainable system. Major shortcoming is the lack of a legal basis. During 2015-2017, no substantial changes have Implementation taken place. Future in the EU IDB data exchange is Assessment very likely. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data Vienna, October 2017 Robert Bauer yes administrator BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes
hospitals validation check - Hospital sample size none or below advised minimum 0 Hardly above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 1 well above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 2 2 FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 2 C. Total score (max. 20) 19 D. Prospects for 2018+ Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2018? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 2 - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no substantial improvements necessary 2 2 Extension of sample planned - Legal basis for MDS data collection? No plans 0 Ongoing substantial discussion 1 In place or very likely 2 0 - Capacities in your organization for injury data collection/ analysis? Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay the same 1 Sufficient or will increase 2 2 - Interest to participate in future EU injury information projects? no 0 Yes, but depending on availability of internal resources 1 Yes, we remain strongly interested 2 2 D. Total score (max. 10) 8 Summary Implementation Assessment Excellent and sustainable system. Major shortcoming is the lack of a legal basis. During 2015-2017, no substantial changes have taken place. Future in the EU IDB data exchange is very likely. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data administrator Vienna, October 2017 Robert Bauer yes BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes
Sustainability%20Report.docx