Country: ESTONIA August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as 2 not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 We have been observer or full of participating in member (2015) the network , different projects and events since IDB1 project - Participation 2 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2 level in past seven meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended - Government 2 0 1 2 No or only weak only for duration for longer endorsement support of term perspective for endorsement - Responsive to 2 only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered 2 none 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 Start 2012 in past five for just one year for two or years more years 2 - MDS data 2014 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 complete and 2 delivered expected in time - Accuracy of 1 more than 40% 0 between 10% 1 less than 10% 2 Average about coding (most unknown and 40% unknown 17% in 2012 current unknown delivery) Incidence rate 2 Not available 0 Only on paper 1 Reference 2 or not for last population file delivery for 2014 - Consistency of 1 IR not available 0 not consistent or 1 Fully 2 Tb checked case definition unclear consistent (IDB & HDR or EDR) Scope of data 2 2 Two or more Just one No “warning collection “warning flags” “warning flag” flag” - FDS sample 0 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 Complete and 2 2014 expected in time B. Total score (max. 14) 10 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection 2 no data & no plan 0 no data but 1 Collected & 2 ongoing to (re)start restart planned / delivery data delivery certain uncertain
Country: ESTONIA August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 We have been participating in the network , different projects and events since IDB1 project - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the seven meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 2 - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 2 - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 2 A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered in past five years none 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 2 Start 2012 - MDS data 2014 delivered Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 complete and in time 2 2 - Accuracy of coding (most current delivery) more than 40% unknown 0 between 10% and 40% unknown 1 less than 10% unknown 2 1 Average about 17% in 2012 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper or not for last delivery 1 Reference population file for 2014 2 2 - Consistency of case definition (IDB & HDR or EDR) IR not available 0 not consistent or unclear 1 Fully consistent 2 1 Tb checked Scope of data collection Two or more “warning flags” Just one “warning flag” No “warning flag” 2 2 - FDS sample 2014 Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 Complete and in time 2 0 B. Total score (max. 14) 10 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection ongoing no data & no plan to (re)start 0 no data but restart planned / data delivery uncertain 1 Collected & delivery certain 2 2
Sustainability%20Report.docx