by other analysed and agencies? used by Nabilan and other organisations. KEQ 3 What Principle: Addressing KEQ3 and its Mid-term review N/A N/A key factors will Sustainability sub-questions will be a contribute to key focus of the mid-term the review. To answer these sustainability questions, the mid-term of the Nabilan review will synthesise program data from a range of outcomes sources, including key beyond the informant interviews, end of the reviews of existing program? documents and literature, existing data collected to answer KEQs 1 and 2, 3.1 To what IO1.3: Relevant Instances that Partner N/A 1 MoU with MoH extent is GOTL Ministries use reflect GoTL reports signed; 1 PRPF resourcing evidence to recognition of the Meeting held each year; prevention allocate funding need for sustainable minutes and funding discussed activities and of essential funding for services public at coordination essential services statements meetings with UN services for from GoTL agencies, women and ImO1.3 Partners Mid-term government and children advocate for review donors impacted by increased GoTL Evidence of changed GoTL budget Available - 2017 N/A violence? How funding of funding portfolio allocations has Nabilan essential VAWC (%) provided by influenced this? services Nabilan/other donors/government to for Nabilan partners Evidence of Nabilan Partner reports N/A N/A partners advocating to GoTL for increased funding 3.2 Is to Indicators 13 and Refer to Indicators Refer to Indicators CBA evidence of 23 above monitoring 13 and 23 above 13 and 23 above changes in Mid-term community review attitudes and practices
by other agencies? analysed and used by Nabilan and other organisations. KEQ 3 What key factors will contribute to the sustainability of the Nabilan program outcomes beyond the end of the program? Principle: Sustainability Addressing KEQ3 and its sub-questions will be a key focus of the mid-term review. To answer these questions, the mid-term review will synthesise data from a range of sources, including key informant interviews, reviews of existing documents and literature, existing data collected to answer KEQs 1 and 2, Mid-term review N/A N/A 3.1 To what extent is GOTL resourcing prevention activities and essential services for women and children impacted by violence? How has Nabilan influenced this? IO1.3: Relevant Ministries use evidence to allocate funding of essential services ImO1.3 Partners advocate for increased GoTL funding of essential VAWC services Instances that reflect GoTL recognition of the need for sustainable funding for services Partner reports Meeting minutes and public statements from GoTL Mid-term review N/A 1 MoU with MoH signed; 1 PRPF held each year; funding discussed at coordination meetings with UN agencies, government and donors Evidence of changed funding portfolio (%) provided by Nabilan/other donors/government to for Nabilan partners GoTL budget allocations Available - 2017 N/A Evidence of Nabilan partners advocating to GoTL for increased funding Partner reports N/A N/A 3.2 Is evidence of changes in community attitudes and practices to Indicators 13 and 23 above CBA monitoring Mid-term review Refer to Indicators 13 and 23 above Refer to Indicators 13 and 23 above
timor-leste-nabilan-monitoring-evaluation-learning-plan.docx