teacher management it will be must. 18 Profile of RPs and SSs and Not in TORs RPs and SSs who are Medium their capacity development responsible for needs monitoring and pedagogical support to teachers are themselves not monitored and evaluated properly, 19 Assessment of private sector Not explicit Requires a study on High provisioning of education at in TORs governance systems, various levels teacher management and quality assurance mechanisms in private schools Appendix VI: Comments Grid Comments made by stakeholders on the draft of the MTR Evaluation Report Comments Response Whether No. incorporated and where NORAD underscores the importance of with this observation. Annex 1, Section V, 1 capacity development throughout the These issues have been subsections a-c system, as without the necessary level highlighted in Annex 1 on and g and Section of capacity; the system will not be able Governance and specific VII (iii) to deliver on other agendas such as recommendations made for teacher management, quality and reorienting the capacity inclusion/equity. Adequate financial development efforts and for resources must be prioritized for revising the existing capacity capacity development purposes. development plan to address the issues highlighted 2 also seems to be a need to MOE and DPs to consider No action in Report. redefine and/or clarify the categories what is required and recurrent/development budgets in incorporate in coding system. order to better understand their content. 3 Recommendations should be provided We left that to the MTR since No action in a prioritized order, within many recommendations, we components and between knew, would be rejected. The components. 20 recommendations are already a distillation of those made in the main text and Annexes.
teacher management it will be must. 18 Profile of RPs and SSs and their capacity development needs Not in TORs RPs and SSs who are responsible for monitoring and pedagogical support to teachers are themselves not monitored and evaluated properly, Medium 19 Assessment of private sector provisioning of education at various levels Not explicit in TORs Requires a study on governance systems, teacher management and quality assurance mechanisms in private schools High Appendix VI: Comments Grid Comments made by stakeholders on the draft of the MTR Evaluation Report No. Comments Response Whether incorporated and where NORAD 1 underscores the importance of capacity development throughout the system, as without the necessary level of capacity; the system will not be able to deliver on other agendas such as teacher management, quality and inclusion/equity. Adequate financial resources must be prioritized for capacity development purposes. with this observation. These issues have been highlighted in Annex 1 on Governance and specific recommendations made for reorienting the capacity development efforts and for revising the existing capacity development plan to address the issues highlighted Annex 1, Section V, subsections a-c and g and Section VII (iii) 2 also seems to be a need to redefine and/or clarify the categories recurrent/development budgets in order to better understand their content. MOE and DPs to consider what is required and incorporate in coding system. No action in Report. 3 Recommendations should be provided in a prioritized order, within components and between components. We left that to the MTR since many recommendations, we knew, would be rejected. The 20 recommendations are already a distillation of those made in the main text and Annexes. No action
ssrp-mtr-eval-main-report.docx