Greater than 90% of course have enrichment plans for students (B5) Elements for Discussion: Model for individualized learning plans and support systems. Structures for personalization – recommendations around credits (seat time), competency based systems - progress based on mastery not age bound. Integrated infrastructure and systems support needed for leading academic learning processes and performance Inclusive, respectful and accessible process of consultation and decision making regarding the Shakopee Experience The Shakopee Experience Process GUIDING CHANGE DOCUMENT Team Facilitator: JP Jacobson 5-Year Technology Plan March, 2014 Context and Current Reality Unacceptable Means Results “The Why” “The Not How” “The What” The district currently does not provide Knowingly violate law, policy or binding adequate access to technology enhanced agreement learning for students Create inequity in access to programming Transformation of learning environment The district has made investments in and educational opportunities by design networking and wireless infrastructure through digital curriculum and critical Exceed established financial and capital throughout our buildings, but doesn’t technology tools parameters in budget and long range currently have the devices to maximize its 99% of time technology infrastructure planning use to support instruction meets the needs of students/teachers (C1) Teacher/staff computers have not been Design a system around any special interest 90% of teachers report daily use of replaced as needed group, individual or group of staff technology tools (C2) We have a growing interest and expertise Design a system that knowingly limits 90% of teachers receive training on critical amongst teachers to incorporate digital district flexibility and nimbleness to a high
Greater than 90% of course have enrichment plans for students (B5) Elements for Discussion: Model for individualized learning plans and support systems. Structures for personalization – recommendations around credits (seat time), competency based systems - progress based on mastery not age bound. Integrated infrastructure and systems support needed for leading academic learning processes and performance Inclusive, respectful and accessible process of consultation and decision making regarding the Shakopee Experience The Shakopee Experience Process GUIDING CHANGE DOCUMENT Team Facilitator: JP Jacobson 5-Year Technology Plan March, 2014 Context and Current Reality “The Why” Unacceptable Means “The Not How” Results “The What” The district currently does not provide adequate access to technology enhanced learning for students The district has made investments in networking and wireless infrastructure throughout our buildings, but doesn’t currently have the devices to maximize its use to support instruction Teacher/staff computers have not been replaced as needed We have a growing interest and expertise amongst teachers to incorporate digital Knowingly violate law, policy or binding agreement Create inequity in access to programming and educational opportunities by design Exceed established financial and capital parameters in budget and long range planning Design a system around any special interest group, individual or group of staff Design a system that knowingly limits district flexibility and nimbleness to a high Transformation of learning environment through digital curriculum and critical technology tools 99% of time technology infrastructure meets the needs of students/teachers (C1) 90% of teachers report daily use of technology tools (C2) 90% of teachers receive training on critical
2014-04-17%20Guiding%20Coalition%20Meeting%20Report.docx