plan in place improvements for next years? necessary 1 - Legal basis for No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 Delivery is MDS data substantial very likely uncertain due to collection? discussion data protection issues 1 - Capacities in Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay 1 Sufficient or 2 Uncertain your the same will increase organization for injury data collection/ analysis? 2 - Interest to no 0 Yes, but 1 Yes, we 2 participate in depending on remain future EU injury availability of strongly information internal interested projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 8 Summary Excellent & sustainable system. Between 2015-2017, increasing challenges to maintain the FDS data collection and to secure Implementation resources for data handling. Future in the EU IDB Assessment data exchange is likely. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data Copenhagen, 10.10.17 Bjarne Laursen OK administrator BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser OK National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: ESTONIA October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments 2 - Membership as not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 observer or full of member (2015) 2 - Participation 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2 level in past eight meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended 2 - Government No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 endorsement support of term
plan in place for next years? improvements necessary - Legal basis for MDS data collection? No plans 0 Ongoing substantial discussion 1 In place or very likely 2 1 Delivery is uncertain due to data protection issues - Capacities in your organization for injury data collection/ analysis? Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay the same 1 Sufficient or will increase 2 1 Uncertain - Interest to participate in future EU injury information projects? no 0 Yes, but depending on availability of internal resources 1 Yes, we remain strongly interested 2 2 D. Total score (max. 10) 8 Summary Implementation Assessment Excellent & sustainable system. Between 2015-2017, increasing challenges to maintain the FDS data collection and to secure resources for data handling. Future in the EU IDB data exchange is likely. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data administrator Copenhagen, 10.10.17 Bjarne Laursen OK BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser OK National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: ESTONIA October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the eight meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 2 - Government endorsement No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term 2 2
Sustainability%20Report.docx