556 U.S. __ (2009). Nation, 2009/2010 Roberts Scalia Kennedy Thomas Ginsburg Breyer Alito Sotomayer Kagan Souter/Stevens Resign For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against 2009/2010 Sotomayer/Kagan Begin 0% 17.3% 17.7% 10.2% 38.2% 29% 0% 0% __ Overall percentage in favor of tribal interests 0/6 9/52 8/45 4/39 13/34 9/31 0/5 0/1 X X X X X X X X - - United States v. Tohono 563 U.S. __ Nation, O’odham (2011).
Nation, 556 U.S. __ (2009). 2009/2010 Souter/Stevens Resign 2009/2010 Sotomayer/Kagan Begin Roberts Scalia Kennedy Thomas Ginsburg Breyer Alito Sotomayer Kagan For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against For Against Overall percentage in favor of tribal interests 0% 0/6 17.3% 9/52 17.7% 8/45 10.2% 4/39 38.2% 13/34 29% 9/31 0% 0/5 0% 0/1 __ United States v. Tohono O’odham Nation, 563 U.S. __ (2011). X X X X X X X X - -
supreme-court-justice-indian-law-report-card.docx