National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: GREECE October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments 1 - Membership as not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 Just one year observer or full of during JAMIE member (2015) project 0 - Participation 0 1 2 2 or less of the 3-4 of the at least 5 level in past eight meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended 0 - Government No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 endorsement support of term perspective for endorsement participation 0 - Responsive to only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 1 Collaboration stopped after JAMIE B. Data delivery (up to 0 Comments 0 1 - Data delivered 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 Just 2012 in past five for just one year for two or years more years 2016) 1 0 - MDS data 2016 0 Not yet but 1 complete and 2 delivered expected in time 2 - Accuracy of more than 40% 0 between 10% 1 less than 10% 2 2012 coding (most unknown and 40% unknown current unknown delivery) 0 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper 1 Reference 2 or not for last population file delivery for 2016 0 - Consistency of IR not available 0 not consistent or 1 Consistent 2 Not applicable case definition unclear (IDB & HDR or EDR) 0 Scope of data 2 Two or more Just one No Small and biased “warning collection sample, no rates “warning flags” “warning flag” flag” 0 - FDS sample Not available 0 Not yet but 1 Complete and 2 2016 expected in time B. Total score (max. 14) 3 Data collection
National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: GREECE October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 1 Just one year during JAMIE project - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the eight meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 0 - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 0 - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 0 A. Total score (max. 8) 1 Collaboration stopped after JAMIE B. Data delivery (up to 0 Comments - Data delivered in past five years 0 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 1 Just 2012 - MDS data 2016 delivered 1 0 Not yet but expected 1 complete and in time 2 0 - Accuracy of coding (most current delivery) more than 40% unknown 0 between 10% and 40% unknown 1 less than 10% unknown 2 2 2012 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper or not for last delivery 1 Reference population file for 2016 2 0 - Consistency of case definition (IDB & HDR or EDR) IR not available 0 not consistent or unclear 1 Consistent 2 0 Not applicable Scope of data collection Two or more “warning flags” Just one “warning flag” No “warning flag” 2 0 Small and biased sample, no rates - FDS sample 2016 Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 Complete and in time 2 0 B. Total score (max. 14) 3 Data collection 2016) participation
Sustainability%20Report.docx