2 Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a 1 Valid at 2 region national level 1 Sampling of Just by 0 rational 1 Validated 2 hospitals availability of sampling but no sample hospitals validation check 2 - Hospital none or below 0 Hardly above 1 well above 2 sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) 0 FDS data none 0 Sample below 1 Sample above 2 minimum minimum expected expected (<3000) (3000+) C. Total score (max. 20) 15 D. Prospects for 2018+ Score Comments 2 - Will the MDS no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 data collection continue in 2018? 1 - Improvement None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no 2 or maintenance substantial plan in place improvements for next years? necessary 2 - Legal basis for No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 In Wales yes MDS data substantial very likely collection? discussion 1 - Capacities in Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay 1 Sufficient or 2 your the same will increase organization for injury data collection/ analysis? 1 - Interest to no 0 Yes, but 1 Yes, we 2 participate in depending on remain future EU injury availability of strongly information internal interested projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 7 Brexit could affect future collaboration Very good and sustained system. Desired is the implementation Summary of all MDS codes and an additional FDS sample from at least one reference hospital. During 2015-2017, quality of the MDS Implementation based rates has been improved. Future in the EU Assessment IDB data exchange is uncertain due to current political developments and increasing data protection concerns. Approval Function Place, date Name OK Swansea, October Ronan Lyons National IDB data Informed, no objection,
Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a region 1 Valid at national level 2 2 Sampling of hospitals Just by availability of hospitals 0 rational sampling but no validation check 1 Validated sample 2 1 - Hospital sample size none or below advised minimum 0 Hardly above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 1 well above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 2 2 FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 0 C. Total score (max. 20) 15 D. Prospects for 2018+ Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2018? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 2 - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no substantial improvements necessary 2 1 - Legal basis for MDS data collection? No plans 0 Ongoing substantial discussion 1 In place or very likely 2 2 In Wales yes - Capacities in your organization for injury data collection/ analysis? Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay the same 1 Sufficient or will increase 2 1 - Interest to participate in future EU injury information projects? no 0 Yes, but depending on availability of internal resources 1 Yes, we remain strongly interested 2 1 D. Total score (max. 10) 7 Brexit could affect future collaboration Summary Implementation Assessment Very good and sustained system. Desired is the implementation of all MDS codes and an additional FDS sample from at least one reference hospital. During 2015-2017, quality of the MDS based rates has been improved. Future in the EU IDB data exchange is uncertain due to current political developments and increasing data protection concerns. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data Swansea, October Ronan Lyons Informed, no objection,
Sustainability%20Report.docx