Finalize with external partner the 6 & 7. Our external partner incorporates a rigorous progress monthly monitoring and evaluation monitoring and data collection process within the selected processes/activities to monitor and CIM framework. The vendor team will collect weekly, assess the transformation process. monthly, annual data from their on-site visits and trainings. Identify local school and the School Our leadership team will sit down face to face with the Board activities that further monitor Pearson representatives to identify and clarify all progress and evaluate success over time, monitoring/data collection activities, which include including schedules, activities, observations, informal dialog with teachers, participation in anticipated rubrics or monitoring tools, monthly professional learning communities, and stakeholder etc. principal and leadership team input. These data will be available to our school leaders on a – 24/7 basis through OneView, an online progress monitoring system that also provides classroom videos, materials, and connections to Pearson experts Establish a special populations review In addition, we will support the monitoring and program plan principal & leadership team – evaluation process through commitment to our formal state’s teacher evaluation program, RISE. There is a part of each teacher's final summative score called a Student Learning Objective that deals with student growth. This part of the evaluation requires teachers to use the data from the beginning of the year, set a goal and then analyze the end of the year data. From there the teacher's score is given based on the percentage of students meeting the required goal. Our continued use of the RISE evaluation system solidifies our adherence to an evaluation system for principal and teachers that includes multiple assessments aligned to student growth our data reveal that our students with disabilities, particularly at the high school level, are performing far below peers on annual assessments, we will establish a special ’s populations data review component within the larger annual SIG monitoring and evaluation plan. Our review of this special population’s data will include looking at classroom academic performance, discipline records, IEP processes, etc. We will include a special education teacher on our leadership team so that the teaching, learning and behavioral needs of this
Finalize with external partner the monthly monitoring and evaluation processes/activities to monitor and assess the transformation process. Identify local school and the School Board activities that further monitor and evaluate success over time, including schedules, activities, anticipated rubrics or monitoring tools, etc. – principal and leadership team Establish a special populations review plan – principal & leadership team 6 & 7. Our external partner incorporates a rigorous progress monitoring and data collection process within the selected CIM framework. The vendor team will collect weekly, monthly, annual data from their on-site visits and trainings. Our leadership team will sit down face to face with the Pearson representatives to identify and clarify all progress monitoring/data collection activities, which include observations, informal dialog with teachers, participation in monthly professional learning communities, and stakeholder input. These data will be available to our school leaders on a 24/7 basis through OneView, an online progress monitoring system that also provides classroom videos, materials, and connections to Pearson experts In addition, we will support the monitoring and program evaluation process through commitment to our formal state’s teacher evaluation program, RISE. There is a part of each teacher's final summative score called a Student Learning Objective that deals with student growth. This part of the evaluation requires teachers to use the data from the beginning of the year, set a goal and then analyze the end of the year data. From there the teacher's score is given based on the percentage of students meeting the required goal. Our continued use of the RISE evaluation system solidifies our adherence to an evaluation system for principal and teachers that includes multiple assessments aligned to student growth our data reveal that our students with disabilities, particularly at the high school level, are performing far below peers on ’s annual assessments, we will establish a special populations data review component within the larger annual SIG monitoring and evaluation plan. Our review of this special population’s data will include looking at classroom academic performance, discipline records, IEP processes, etc. We will include a special education teacher on our leadership team so that the teaching, learning and behavioral needs of this
thea-bowman-leadership-academy-sig-application-ac.docx