continue in 2018? 2 - Improvement None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no 2 or maintenance substantial plan in place improvements for next years? necessary 2 - Legal basis for No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 MDS data substantial very likely collection? discussion 1 - Capacities in Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay 1 Sufficient or 2 your the same will increase organization for injury data collection/ analysis? 2 - Interest to no 0 Yes, but 1 Yes, we 2 participate in depending on remain future EU injury availability of strongly information internal interested projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 9 Excellent and sustainable system. Recommended is an Summary additional FDS data sample from at least one reference Implementation hospital. During 2015-2017, non substantial changes have Assessment taken place. Future in the EU IDB data exchange is very likely. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data Vilnius, October 2017 Rita Gaidelyte OK administrator BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: LUXEMBOURG October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments 2 - Membership as not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 observer or full of member (2015) 2 - Participation 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2
continue in 2018? - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no substantial improvements necessary 2 2 - Legal basis for MDS data collection? No plans 0 Ongoing substantial discussion 1 In place or very likely 2 2 - Capacities in your organization for injury data collection/ analysis? Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay the same 1 Sufficient or will increase 2 1 - Interest to participate in future EU injury information projects? no 0 Yes, but depending on availability of internal resources 1 Yes, we remain strongly interested 2 2 D. Total score (max. 10) 9 Summary Implementation Assessment Excellent and sustainable system. Recommended is an additional FDS data sample from at least one reference hospital. During 2015-2017, non substantial changes have taken place. Future in the EU IDB data exchange is very likely. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data administrator Vilnius, October 2017 Rita Gaidelyte OK BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: LUXEMBOURG October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 - Participation 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2 2
Sustainability%20Report.docx