(mechanism, injury type, body part) - Incidence rates 2 IR not available 0 only crude rate 1 standardized 2 or based on for age and catchment sex Geo-coverage 2 IR not available 0 Valid only for a 1 Valid at 2 region national level Sampling of 1 Just by 0 rational 1 Validated 2 hospitals availability of sampling but no sample hospitals validation check - Hospital 2 none or below 0 Hardly above 1 well above 2 sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) FDS data 2 none 0 Sample below 1 Sample above 2 minimum minimum expected expected (<3000) (3000+) C. Total score (max. 20) 19 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS 2 no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 Not likely, but data collection eventual some continue in problems due to 2016? funding reasons - Improvement 2 None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial 2 Not necessary – or maintenance improvements there should be a plan in place necessary major renovation for next years? of Out-patient information system in 2015 - Legal basis for 2 No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 Health care MDS data substantial very likely databases act collection? discussion - Capacities in 1 Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay 1 Sufficient or 2 your the same will increase organization for injury data collection/ analysis? - Interest to 2 no 0 Yes, but 1 Yes, we 2 participate in depending on remain future EU injury availability of strongly information internal interested projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 9 Summary Excellent and sustainable system. Minor shortcoming is that not all FDS variables are covered. Implementation Assessment Signatures
(mechanism, injury type, body part) - Incidence rates IR not available 0 only crude rate or based on catchment 1 standardized for age and sex 2 2 Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a region 1 Valid at national level 2 2 Sampling of hospitals Just by availability of hospitals 0 rational sampling but no validation check 1 Validated sample 2 1 - Hospital sample size none or below advised minimum 0 Hardly above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 1 well above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 2 2 FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 2 C. Total score (max. 20) 19 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2016? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 2 Not likely, but eventual some problems due to funding reasons - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial improvements necessary 2 2 Not necessary – there should be a major renovation of Out-patient information system in 2015 - Legal basis for MDS data collection? No plans 0 Ongoing substantial discussion 1 In place or very likely 2 2 Health care databases act - Capacities in your organization for injury data collection/ analysis? Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay the same 1 Sufficient or will increase 2 1 - Interest to participate in future EU injury information projects? no 0 Yes, but depending on availability of internal resources 1 Yes, we remain strongly interested 2 2 D. Total score (max. 10) 9 Summary Implementation Assessment Excellent and sustainable system. Minor shortcoming is that not all FDS variables are covered. Signatures
Sustainability%20Report.docx