several statements without appropriately citing. Responsive to prior Highly responsive to Largely responsive to Somewhat responsive Highly unresponsive to feedback previous feedback from previous feedback from to previous feedback previous feedback faculty. Feedback is well faculty. Feedback is from faculty. from faculty. integrated into the current somewhat integrated into document. the current document. General recommendations for the thesis /dissertation defense: Qualifying Exam Rubric: Pre-oral exam evaluation of the written document Component met (3) Met (2) Partially Met (1) Not met (0) Score Biological bases of Effectively and insightfully Provides a solid answer Answers the question, Question is not psychology answers the exam to the question. Presents but the answer lacks answered. The answer question. Provides good scientific evidence depth and a clear is superficial and lacks scientific evidence to to support conclusions, integration of existing any clear support conclusions and although may have research and theory. demonstration of an provides a thoughtful, rich, missed a few relevant Some sections are understanding of the astute answer that is citations. The answer is clearly organized and conceptual issues the consistent with and or clearly represents the focused and others question addressed. extends existing empirical empirical and theoretical are not. and theoretical work. work. Social of Effectively and insightfully Provides a answer to Answers the question, Question is not psychology answers the exam the question. Presents but the answer answered. The answer question. Provides good scientific evidence depth and a clear is superficial and lacks scientific evidence to to support conclusions, integration of existing any clear support conclusions and although may have research and theory. demonstration of an
several statements without appropriately citing. Responsive to prior feedback Highly responsive to previous feedback from faculty. Feedback is well integrated into the current document. Largely responsive to previous feedback from faculty. Feedback is somewhat integrated into the current document. Somewhat responsive to previous feedback from faculty. Highly unresponsive to previous feedback from faculty. General recommendations for the thesis /dissertation defense: Qualifying Exam Rubric: Pre-oral exam evaluation of the written document Component met (3) Met (2) Partially Met (1) Not met (0) Score Biological bases of psychology Effectively and insightfully answers the exam question. Provides scientific evidence to support conclusions and provides a thoughtful, rich, astute answer that is consistent with and or extends existing empirical and theoretical work. Provides a solid answer to the question. Presents good scientific evidence to support conclusions, although may have missed a few relevant citations. The answer is clearly represents the empirical and theoretical work. Answers the question, but the answer lacks depth and a clear integration of existing research and theory. Some sections are clearly organized and focused and others are not. Question is not answered. The answer is superficial and lacks any clear demonstration of an understanding of the conceptual issues the question addressed. Social of psychology Effectively and insightfully answers the exam question. Provides scientific evidence to support conclusions and Provides a answer to the question. Presents good scientific evidence to support conclusions, although may have Answers the question, but the answer depth and a clear integration of existing research and theory. Question is not answered. The answer is superficial and lacks any clear demonstration of an
Thesis-and-Dissertation-Evaluation-Rubric-final.docx