In September 2011 another White Paper called Peaceful Development” issued by the “China’s State Council Information Office, in which it explains the development” more “peaceful academically, scientifically and theoretically. In this paper, it summarized the to peaceful “path development” as follows: the broader perspective on the world history, the path to peaceful development is: “From develop China itself through safeguarding world peace and development and in turn to safeguard world peace and development though its own development; when stressed on China’s own strength, reform and innovation to achieve development and at the same time China has to adhere to the opening policy and draw on the strengths of other countries; China has to adapt to the development trend of economic globalization and to seek mutual benefit and common development with other countries; with the support and help from the international community efforts, China would like to promote an enduring peace, common prosperity and harmonious world. The most distinctive feature is developments”: scientific development, self-development, open “five development, peaceful development and cooperative development.” The general aim and the foreign policy based on peaceful development are explored clearly as well in this White Paper 2011. In a nutshell, it summarized those points” introduced in “five 2005. 3.3.3 The difference between development and rise Even though there are still many articles, papers, journals using both terms, especially in academic circles, there is actually only development theory” used officially now since “peaceful April 2004. President Hu and Prime Minister Wen have replaced the use the term of with “rise” which means the top leader made a decision to use peaceful rise in research and “development”, academic circles, but no longer to use in the leadership speeches of government and Party documents. Despite of changing the terminology there is little difference in the content of the peaceful rise theory and peaceful development theory in Chinese discourse besides includes a new concept of world”. In Lin Jianfei’s paper, there is no essential “harmonious “……(Besides), difference between the words, both are just two ways of expressing the same process.” But the terminology of in western discourse, implicates like a challenge and it will post a threat to “rise”, the pre-existing situation and the balance of the power. Also a Chinese scholar explains that rise
In September 2011 another White Paper called “China’s Peaceful Development” issued by the State Council Information Office, in which it explains the “peaceful development” more academically, scientifically and theoretically. In this paper, it summarized the “path to peaceful development” as follows: “From the broader perspective on the world history, the path to peaceful development is: develop China itself through safeguarding world peace and development and in turn to safeguard world peace and development though its own development; when stressed on China’s own strength, reform and innovation to achieve development and at the same time China has to adhere to the opening policy and draw on the strengths of other countries; China has to adapt to the development trend of economic globalization and to seek mutual benefit and common development with other countries; with the support and help from the international community efforts, China would like to promote an enduring peace, common prosperity and harmonious world. The most distinctive feature is “five developments”: scientific development, self-development, open development, peaceful development and cooperative development.” The general aim and the foreign policy based on peaceful development are explored clearly as well in this White Paper 2011. In a nutshell, it summarized those “five points” introduced in 2005. 3.3.3 The difference between development and rise Even though there are still many articles, papers, journals using both terms, especially in academic circles, there is actually only “peaceful development theory” used officially now since April 2004. President Hu and Prime Minister Wen have replaced the use the term of “rise” with “development”, which means the top leader made a decision to use peaceful rise in research and academic circles, but no longer to use in the leadership speeches of government and Party documents. Despite of changing the terminology there is little difference in the content of the peaceful rise theory and peaceful development theory in Chinese discourse besides includes a new concept of “harmonious world”. In Lin Jianfei’s paper, “……(Besides), there is no essential difference between the words, both are just two ways of expressing the same process.” But the terminology of “rise”, in western discourse, implicates like a challenge and it will post a threat to the pre-existing situation and the balance of the power. Also a Chinese scholar explains that rise
the_whole_thesis1.docx