MALE* FEMALE* BME WHITE ETHNICITY DISABLED NOT NOT DISABLED** Heads % Heads % Heads % Heads % % % % 2012 Applied 184 74 40% 108 59% 37 20% 143 78% 4 2.1% 8 4.3% 176 95% Shortlisted 67 23 34% 43 64% 7 10% 58 86% 2 2.9% 4 5.9% 63 94% Appointed 51 17 33% 33 65% 5 10% 44 86% 2 3.9% 2 3.9% 49 96% 2011 Applied 436 164 38% 271 62% 97 22% 331 76% 8 1.8% 21 4.8% 415 95% Shortlisted 195 59 30% 136 70% 24 12% 167 86% 4 2.1% 15 7.7% 180 92% Appointed 122 38 31% 84 69% 17 14% 101 83% 4 3.3% 8 6.6% 114 93% 2010 Applied 462 174 38% 288 62% 89 19% 352 76% 21 4.5% 26 5.6% 436 94% Shortlisted 180 62 34% 118 66% 22 12% 149 83% 9 5.0% 7 3.9% 173 96% Appointed 83 24 29% 59 71% 7 8.0% 72 87% 4 4.8% 5 6.0% 78 94% * Data excludes applicants who did not declare a gender. Figures for Disabled” include applicants who did not provide data; from 2011 data relates to the period August to July. ** “Not Table 14 shows a significant reduction in temporary recruitment in 2012 compared to 2011, recruitment in 2011 having increased to provide additional interim support during the period of organisational restructuring. The 2012 figures show that the success rate for female applicants through the recruitment process continues to be better than for male applicants. In 2012 the proportion of BME applicants and appointments has declined compared to 2011, as has the proportion of applicants declaring as disabled. TABLE 15 - INTERNAL RECRUITMENT ONLY BY EQUALITY GROUP
MALE* FEMALE* BME WHITE ETHNICITY NOT DISABLED NOT DISABLED** Heads % Heads % Heads % Heads % % % % 2012 Applied Shortlisted Appointed 184 67 51 74 23 17 40% 34% 33% 108 43 33 59% 64% 65% 37 7 5 20% 10% 10% 143 58 44 78% 86% 86% 4 2 2 2.1% 2.9% 3.9% 8 4 2 4.3% 5.9% 3.9% 176 63 49 95% 94% 96% 2011 Applied Shortlisted Appointed 436 195 122 164 59 38 38% 30% 31% 271 136 84 62% 70% 69% 97 24 17 22% 12% 14% 331 167 101 76% 86% 83% 8 4 4 1.8% 2.1% 3.3% 21 15 8 4.8% 7.7% 6.6% 415 180 114 95% 92% 93% 2010 Applied Shortlisted Appointed 462 180 83 174 62 24 38% 34% 29% 288 118 59 62% 66% 71% 89 22 7 19% 12% 8.0% 352 149 72 76% 83% 87% 21 9 4 4.5% 5.0% 4.8% 26 7 5 5.6% 3.9% 6.0% 436 173 78 94% 96% 94% * Data excludes applicants who did not declare a gender. ** Figures for “Not Disabled” include applicants who did not provide data; from 2011 data relates to the period August to July. Table 14 shows a significant reduction in temporary recruitment in 2012 compared to 2011, recruitment in 2011 having increased to provide additional interim support during the period of organisational restructuring. The 2012 figures show that the success rate for female applicants through the recruitment process continues to be better than for male applicants. In 2012 the proportion of BME applicants and appointments has declined compared to 2011, as has the proportion of applicants declaring as disabled. TABLE 15 - INTERNAL RECRUITMENT ONLY BY EQUALITY GROUP
Staffing%20Compendium%202012.docx