2 = Documentation includes and emphasizes proactive approaches AND administrator reports consistent use A 0 = No process for teaching staff Professional Development: Professional written process is used for orienting is in place development all faculty/staff on 4 core Tier I 1 = Process is calendar SWPBIS practices: (a) teaching informal/unwritten, not part Staff handbook school-wide expectations, (b) of professional development acknowledging appropriate calendar, and/or does not behavior, (c) correcting errors, and include all staff or all 4 core (d) requesting assistance. Tier I practices 2 = Formal process for teaching all all aspects of Tier I system, including all 4 core Tier I practices Scoring Criteria Possible Subscale Feature 0 = Not implemented Data Sources 1 = Partially implemented 2 = Fully implemented Classroom Procedures: Tier I Staff handbook 0 = Classrooms are not formally features (school-wide expectations, Informal implementing Tier I routines, acknowledgements, walkthroughs 1 = Classrooms are informally continuum of consequences) Progress implementing Tier I but no are implemented within classrooms monitoring formal system exists and consistent with school-wide Individual 2 = Classrooms are formally systems. classroom data implementing all core Tier I features, consistent with school-wide expectations Feedback and Acknowledgement: TFI Walkthrough 0 = No formal system for A formal system (i.e., written set of Tool acknowledging students procedures for specific behavior 1 = Formal system is in place but feedback that is [a] linked to is not used by at least 90% of school-wide expectations and [b] staff and/or received by at used across settings and within least 50% of students classrooms) is in place and used by 2 = Formal system for at least 90% of a sample of staff acknowledging student and received by at least 50% of a behavior is used by at least Implementation sample of students. 90% of staff AND received by at least 50% of students Faculty are PBIS 0 = Faculty are not shown data at Faculty Involvement: shown school-wide data regularly Assessment Survey least yearly and do not and provide input on universal Informal surveys provide input foundations (e.g., expectations, Staff meeting 1 = Faculty have been shown acknowledgements, definitions, minutes data more than yearly OR consequences) at least every 12 Team meeting have provided feedback on months. minutes Tier I foundations within the past 12 months but not both 2 = Faculty are shown data at least 4 times per year AND
2 = Documentation includes and emphasizes proactive approaches AND administrator reports consistent use Professional Development: A written process is used for orienting all faculty/staff on 4 core Tier I SWPBIS practices: (a) teaching school-wide expectations, (b) acknowledging appropriate behavior, (c) correcting errors, and (d) requesting assistance. Professional development calendar Staff handbook 0 = No process for teaching staff is in place 1 = Process is informal/unwritten, not part of professional development calendar, and/or does not include all staff or all 4 core Tier I practices 2 = Formal process for teaching all all aspects of Tier I system, including all 4 core Tier I practices Subscale Feature Possible Data Sources Scoring Criteria 0 = Not implemented 1 = Partially implemented 2 = Fully implemented Implementation Classroom Procedures: Tier I features (school-wide expectations, routines, acknowledgements, continuum of consequences) are implemented within classrooms and consistent with school-wide systems. Staff handbook Informal walkthroughs Progress monitoring Individual classroom data 0 = Classrooms are not formally implementing Tier I 1 = Classrooms are informally implementing Tier I but no formal system exists 2 = Classrooms are formally implementing all core Tier I features, consistent with school-wide expectations Feedback and Acknowledgement: A formal system (i.e., written set of procedures for specific behavior feedback that is [a] linked to school-wide expectations and [b] used across settings and within classrooms) is in place and used by at least 90% of a sample of staff and received by at least 50% of a sample of students. TFI Walkthrough Tool 0 = No formal system for acknowledging students 1 = Formal system is in place but is not used by at least 90% of staff and/or received by at least 50% of students 2 = Formal system for acknowledging student behavior is used by at least 90% of staff AND received by at least 50% of students Faculty Involvement: Faculty are shown school-wide data regularly and provide input on universal foundations (e.g., expectations, acknowledgements, definitions, consequences) at least every 12 months. PBIS Survey Informal surveys Staff meeting minutes Team meeting minutes 0 = Faculty are not shown data at least yearly and do not provide input 1 = Faculty have been shown data more than yearly OR have provided feedback on Tier I foundations within the past 12 months but not both 2 = Faculty are shown data at least 4 times per year AND Assessment
2014_09-29_Tiered_Fidelity_Inventory_Version_2_1.docx