Table 3.1: Summary for data collection methods Specific Objective Variables Indicator Method/tool Source of Data 1. Compare the proportion of FIF Amount allocated, Total Amount for each Difference in Extracted Quarterly FIF allocated for procurement quarter from 2010-2013 Proportion data into Authority to of pharmaceuticals allocated for Form 1 period 2010-2011 (Appendix I) expenditure and 2012-2013 from accounts department 2. To measure the proportional Quantity and Cost of each essential medicine Difference Extracted KEMSA orders, contribution of the various procured sorted by source of funding FIF, between the data into Local Purchase sources of funding to the Other facility)for each quarter from 2010-2013 proportion of Form 3 orders and essential medicines budget medicine (Appendix I) invoices from procured, by suppliers, S3 quantity and cost, cards, Pharmacy for period Summary and budgets from sorted by Supplies office source of funding and Pharmacy department
Table 3.1: Summary for data collection methods Specific Objective Variables Indicator Method/tool Source of Data 1. Compare the proportion of FIF allocated for procurement of pharmaceuticals FIF Amount allocated, Total Amount for each quarter from 2010-2013 Difference in Proportion allocated for period 2010-2011 and 2012-2013 Extracted data into Form 1 (Appendix I) Quarterly Authority to expenditure from accounts department 2. To measure the proportional contribution of the various sources of funding to the essential medicines budget Quantity and Cost of each essential medicine procured sorted by source of funding FIF, Other facility)for each quarter from 2010-2013 Difference between the proportion of medicine procured, by quantity and cost, for period and sorted by source of funding Extracted data into Form 3 (Appendix I) KEMSA orders, Local Purchase orders and invoices from suppliers, S3 cards, Pharmacy Summary budgets from Supplies office and Pharmacy department
THESIS_MECCA.docx