Domain 1: Overview of/Rationale for Research 1 2 3 Overview/rationale for Presenter provides Presenter provides research is missing or overview and rationale and inaccurate rationale but does not identifies key identify research research questions questions with or hypotheses with sufficient detail a good amount of detail Domain 2: Methodology 1 2 3 Overview of Presenter addresses Presenter addresses methodology is important aspects of the methodology limited or inaccurate methods but does not employed so clearly reference students can clearly research design understand how the study was completed. Domain 3: Key Findings 1 2 3 Little to no Presenter does a Presenter does a information on results moderate job of good job related to the specific explaining key explaining key research questions or findings. study findings. hypotheses Domain 4: Contextual Relevance 1 2 3 Presenter does not link Presenter does a Presenter does a the article to a broader moderate job of good job of linking topic. linking the article to a the article to a broader topic. broader topic. Clearly highlights relevance of the findings to the field of psychology and law. Domain 5: In Class Presentation 1 2 3 Presentation style was Clear presentation but Clear presentation not polished (e.g., just little effort at with presenter read from slides generating including questions without engaging the discussion. that generated audience) and there discussion. was no meaningful slides. class discussion.
Domain 1: Overview of/Rationale for Research 1 Overview/rationale for research is missing or inaccurate 2 Presenter provides overview and rationale but does not identify research questions with sufficient detail 3 Presenter provides rationale and identifies key research questions or hypotheses with a good amount of detail Domain 2: Methodology 1 Overview of methodology is limited or inaccurate 2 Presenter addresses important aspects of methods but does not clearly reference research design 3 Presenter addresses the methodology employed so students can clearly understand how the study was completed. Domain 3: Key Findings 1 Little to no information on results related to the specific research questions or hypotheses 2 Presenter does a moderate job of explaining key findings. 3 Presenter does a good job explaining key study findings. Domain 4: Contextual Relevance 1 Presenter does not link the article to a broader topic. 2 Presenter does a moderate job of linking the article to a broader topic. 3 Presenter does a good job of linking the article to a broader topic. Clearly highlights relevance of the findings to the field of psychology and law. Domain 5: In Class Presentation 1 Presentation style was not polished (e.g., just read from slides without engaging the audience) and there was no meaningful class discussion. 2 Clear presentation but little effort at generating discussion. 3 Clear presentation with presenter including questions that generated discussion. slides.
SyllabusHeath2015.docx