something that on occasion varies, and interestingly enough is relevant in many military geographies today. For example, look to Palestine which is not recognized by the United States, but is by other nations. The same goes for the Kurdish who do not belong to a nation state in the middle east, as well as ISIL/ISIS who have proclaimed themselves to be a country within the territory that they conquer, although not recognized as an official country by anyone. Furthermore, governments don’t declare war on countries as much as they do terrorist groups inside of countries, thus how does this implicate the laws of war within the scope of the resolution? Let’s discuss some of these ideas more, as we incorporate them into affirmative and negative strategies.
something that on occasion varies, and interestingly enough is relevant in many military geographies today. For example, look to Palestine which is not recognized by the United States, but is by other nations. The same goes for the Kurdish who do not belong to a nation state in the middle east, as well as ISIL/ISIS who have proclaimed themselves to be a country within the territory that they conquer, although not recognized as an official country by anyone. Furthermore, governments don’t declare war on countries as much as they do terrorist groups inside of countries, thus how does this implicate the laws of war within the scope of the resolution? Let’s discuss some of these ideas more, as we incorporate them into affirmative and negative strategies.
The%20United%20States%20use%20of%20targeted%20killing%20in%20foreign%20countries%20is%20unjust.docx