The Proposed Changes are Unnecessary Current immigration policy provides sufficient protection for the nation’s interests. There are already time limits and eligibility limits on public benefits, as the preamble notes. [The Proposed Rule is Burdensome You may also want to on possible burdens on your organization from the rule. For example, public interest organizations may be called on to answer questions about the new rule and may experience increased call volume and traffic based on concerns about the new policies. Food banks or other charities may experience more demand for non-governmental assistance. If your organization has insights on how the rule will add to their case load, or other public interest organizations and state and federal agencies tasked with providing information for pubic charge determinations, include it here.] Conclusion The Department’s proposals are a drastic change from current policy. The proposed rule is discriminatory and inconsistent with fundamental American principles, including equal opportunity. It’s an unwelcome throwback to the historical isolation, fear, segregation and exclusion of people with disabilities. I/We urge that the Department withdraw this proposed rule. [Please feel free to contact XXXX with any questions about these comments, or for additional information.] Sincerely, Name Title Agency, if appropriate
The Proposed Changes are Unnecessary Current immigration policy provides sufficient protection for the nation’s interests. There are already time limits and eligibility limits on public benefits, as the preamble notes. [The Proposed Rule is Burdensome You may also want to on possible burdens on your organization from the rule. For example, public interest organizations may be called on to answer questions about the new rule and may experience increased call volume and traffic based on concerns about the new policies. Food banks or other charities may experience more demand for non-governmental assistance. If your organization has insights on how the rule will add to their case load, or other public interest organizations and state and federal agencies tasked with providing information for pubic charge determinations, include it here.] Conclusion The Department’s proposals are a drastic change from current policy. The proposed rule is discriminatory and inconsistent with fundamental American principles, including equal opportunity. It’s an unwelcome throwback to the historical isolation, fear, segregation and exclusion of people with disabilities. I/We urge that the Department withdraw this proposed rule. [Please feel free to contact XXXX with any questions about these comments, or for additional information.] Sincerely, Name Title Agency, if appropriate
State-Orgs.-Template-Comments.docx