Rate the performance of this student’s demonstration of practice behaviors that achieved the Program’s core competencies. Each competency will be on a five point Likert Scale. Each level is defined with examples of the student’s performance of the practice behaviors by checking the appropriate number. A competent student integrates theory with agency mission, goals, policies and procedures that direct the service delivery system. The student is culturally competent and demonstrates a professional demeanor relevant to the agency expectations. The student works with supervision effectively and interacts with agency staff and clients appropriately. The five rating levels are defined as follows: RATING LEVEL GENERAL DEFINITION Outstanding performance; work is consistently expert Substantially Exceeds 5 and consistently exceeds results expected to a Expectations substantial degree of a competent student. Superior performance; most work is characterized by 4 Exceeds Expectations significant accomplishments, consistently performs at a above that expected of a competent student. Solid performance; consistently achieves the results 3 Meets Expectations expected of a competent student. Marginal performance; most work is getting done but 2 Below Expectations not at a level expected of a competent student. Improvement is required. Unacceptable performance; work is consistently below Substantially Below 1 standards expected of a competent student. Substantial Expectations improvement is required. No Opportunity presented to evaluate student on NO No Opportunity competency. PRACTICE BEHAVIORS & OUTCOME MEASURES DIRECT PRACTICE Rate the student’s level of performance in Direct Practice learning experiences utilizing the five-point Likert Scale on the previous page. The student’s demonstrated performance of the practice behaviors should be the basis for your assessment.
Rate the performance of this student’s demonstration of practice behaviors that achieved the Program’s core competencies. Each competency will be on a five point Likert Scale. Each level is defined with examples of the student’s performance of the practice behaviors by checking the appropriate number. A competent student integrates theory with agency mission, goals, policies and procedures that direct the service delivery system. The student is culturally competent and demonstrates a professional demeanor relevant to the agency expectations. The student works with supervision effectively and interacts with agency staff and clients appropriately. The five rating levels are defined as follows: RATING LEVEL GENERAL DEFINITION 5 Substantially Exceeds Expectations Outstanding performance; work is consistently expert and consistently exceeds results expected to a substantial degree of a competent student. 4 Exceeds Expectations Superior performance; most work is characterized by significant accomplishments, consistently performs at a above that expected of a competent student. 3 Meets Expectations Solid performance; consistently achieves the results expected of a competent student. 2 Below Expectations Marginal performance; most work is getting done but not at a level expected of a competent student. Improvement is required. 1 Substantially Below Expectations Unacceptable performance; work is consistently below standards expected of a competent student. Substantial improvement is required. NO No Opportunity No Opportunity presented to evaluate student on competency. PRACTICE BEHAVIORS & OUTCOME MEASURES DIRECT PRACTICE Rate the student’s level of performance in Direct Practice learning experiences utilizing the five-point Likert Scale on the previous page. The student’s demonstrated performance of the practice behaviors should be the basis for your assessment.
TeresaPalmerElectronicGraduateFoundationEvaluation.docx