Portraying CISE participants and access rights Current situation and best options Functions/ Current user access rights and Identification of barriers Best CISE options on portraying CISE User Communities responsibility to share participants and access rights Legal (L), technical (T) and cultural (C) (Remarks/comments and overall (Legal basis for data exchange, categorisation of conducive environment for planned legal activities, actors (if data sharing - A (low) , B (medium) or C A. General B. Specific C. D. Legislative specified) and geographic/regional (high)) nature nature Administrative complexity coverage) burdens (simplification) (reporting implications) MARSUNO pilot MARSUNO – Maritime Surveillance The project establishes three categories of information (B.A.R): Proposal project final in the Northern Sea Basins – is a Basic information: Tracking information originates from sensors, The report outlines very thorough discussion report 2011 pilot project initiated by the observations etc. which is free to be exchanged inside CISE. Basic on the scope of the Data Protection rules and (Maritime European Commission. 24 information is not open information. The information is produced specifically in accordance with the maritime Surveillance authorities from ten countries inside the community using CISE area, which is a very useful discussion for the North) (Sweden, Finland, Poland, Latvia, Additional information: This is information created or enriched analyses in chapter 2 and 5. The legislative France, Germany, Lithuania, mainly through the use of analysis tools. This kind of information is proposals are similar to the proposed policy Norway, Estonia and Belgium) are often responding to a specific mission or functionality and will be options in this report however not on a one to partners to the project. shared based on user demands inside the CISE community one basis. Especially proposal no 5 is similar In the legal analysis carried out Restricted information: This information is sensitive and cannot to policy 5. However the analysis does not within the frame of the project the be shared freely inside the community using CISE. The main fear is move to the level of the specific provisions in following pieces of EU legislation the risk of information leaking that could complicate or endanger an the sector legislation. have been identified: operation Directive 95/46/EC (Data The definitions are for the purpose of the operational level and does protection) not necessarily relate directly to a legislative act. E.g. restricted
Functions/ User Communities Portraying CISE participants and access rights Current situation and best options Current user access rights and responsibility to share (Legal basis for data exchange, planned legal activities, actors (if specified) and geographic/regional coverage) Identification of barriers Legal (L), technical (T) and cultural (C) Best CISE options on portraying CISE participants and access rights (Remarks/comments and overall categorisation of conducive environment for data sharing - A (low) , B (medium) or C (high)) A. General nature B. Specific nature C. Administrative burdens (reporting implications) D. Legislative complexity (simplification) MARSUNO pilot project final report 2011 (Maritime Surveillance North) MARSUNO – Maritime Surveillance in the Northern Sea Basins – is a pilot project initiated by the European Commission. 24 authorities from ten countries (Sweden, Finland, Poland, Latvia, France, Germany, Lithuania, Norway, Estonia and Belgium) are partners to the project. In the legal analysis carried out within the frame of the project the following pieces of EU legislation have been identified: Directive 95/46/EC (Data protection) The project establishes three categories of information (B.A.R): Basic information: Tracking information originates from sensors, observations etc. which is free to be exchanged inside CISE. Basic information is not open information. The information is produced inside the community using CISE Additional information: This is information created or enriched mainly through the use of analysis tools. This kind of information is often responding to a specific mission or functionality and will be shared based on user demands inside the CISE community Restricted information: This information is sensitive and cannot be shared freely inside the community using CISE. The main fear is the risk of information leaking that could complicate or endanger an operation The definitions are for the purpose of the operational level and does not necessarily relate directly to a legislative act. E.g. restricted Proposal The report outlines very thorough discussion on the scope of the Data Protection rules and specifically in accordance with the maritime area, which is a very useful discussion for the analyses in chapter 2 and 5. The legislative proposals are similar to the proposed policy options in this report however not on a one to one basis. Especially proposal no 5 is similar to policy 5. However the analysis does not move to the level of the specific provisions in the sector legislation.
20130708-cowi-a031379_interim_report_legal_final_130524.docx