GoTL Contribution to monitoring of NAP-GBV and information relevant to implementation of GoTL programming Partners Information for learning and improvement KEY EVALUATION QUESTIONS AND SUB-QUESTIONS The KEQs were initially developed during the October 2017 workshop with further development in the April 2018 workshops. They provide an organising framework for Nabilan’s monitoring and evaluation approach, and will be used as a structure for progress reports. The KEQs and sub-questions are listed in Table 4 below. Table 4. Key Evaluation Questions and Sub-questions Evaluation Key Evaluation Questions Sub-Questions Criteria Effectiveness KEQ1 How effective was the Nabilan 1.1 To what extent are service provider staff using program in ensuring women and their knowledge and skills for improved service children who experience violence have delivery? access to adequate and responsive 1.2 To what extent did Nabilan contribute to high services? quality service delivery? 1.3 To what extent did Nabilan contribute to inclusive service delivery? 1.4 How has Nabilan strengthened referral pathways? 1.5 How has Nabilan contributed to improving the justice sector response to VAWC? Effectiveness KEQ 2 To what extent are individuals, 2.1 Is Nabilan effectively supporting partner communities and institutions taking agencies to undertake quality prevention action to reduce violence against programming? 2.2 How has Nabilan contributed to the independent movement’s advocacy on gender equity and ending VAWC? 2.3 To what extent has Nabilan influenced increased GOTL dialogue and action on preventing VAWC? 2.4 Is Nabilan effectively supporting Change Ambassadors to influence their programs on quality prevention approaches? 2.5 To what extent has Nabilan supported individuals, communities and institutions to recognise VAWC as a problem? 2.6 To what extent has Nabilan supported communities to take independent action to prevent VAWC? 2.7 To what extent has the evidence from the CBA influenced prevention programming by other agencies? Sustainability KEQ 3 What key factors will 3.1 To contribute what extent is GOTL resourcing prevention to the sustainability of the activities Nabilan and essential services for and children program outcomes beyond impacted the end by of violence? How did Nabilan contribute the program? to this? 3.2 Is there evidence of change of community attitudes and practices relating to VAWC?
GoTL Contribution to monitoring of NAP-GBV and information relevant to implementation of GoTL programming Partners Information for learning and improvement KEY EVALUATION QUESTIONS AND SUB-QUESTIONS The KEQs were initially developed during the October 2017 workshop with further development in the April 2018 workshops. They provide an organising framework for Nabilan’s monitoring and evaluation approach, and will be used as a structure for progress reports. The KEQs and sub-questions are listed in Table 4 below. Table 4. Key Evaluation Questions and Sub-questions Evaluation Criteria Key Evaluation Questions Sub-Questions Effectiveness KEQ1 How effective was the Nabilan program in ensuring women and children who experience violence have access to adequate and responsive services? 1.1 To what extent are service provider staff using their knowledge and skills for improved service delivery? 1.2 To what extent did Nabilan contribute to high quality service delivery? 1.3 To what extent did Nabilan contribute to inclusive service delivery? 1.4 How has Nabilan strengthened referral pathways? 1.5 How has Nabilan contributed to improving the justice sector response to VAWC? Effectiveness KEQ 2 To what extent are individuals, communities and institutions taking action to reduce violence against 2.1 Is Nabilan effectively supporting partner agencies to undertake quality prevention programming? 2.2 How has Nabilan contributed to the independent movement’s advocacy on gender equity and ending VAWC? 2.3 To what extent has Nabilan influenced increased GOTL dialogue and action on preventing VAWC? 2.4 Is Nabilan effectively supporting Change Ambassadors to influence their programs on quality prevention approaches? 2.5 To what extent has Nabilan supported individuals, communities and institutions to recognise VAWC as a problem? 2.6 To what extent has Nabilan supported communities to take independent action to prevent VAWC? 2.7 To what extent has the evidence from the CBA influenced prevention programming by other agencies? Sustainability KEQ 3 What key factors will contribute to the sustainability of the Nabilan program outcomes beyond the end of the program? 3.1 To what extent is GOTL resourcing prevention activities and essential services for and children impacted by violence? How did Nabilan contribute to this? 3.2 Is there evidence of change of community attitudes and practices relating to VAWC?
timor-leste-nabilan-monitoring-evaluation-learning-plan.docx