School ‘X’ Primary and Nursery Summary SEF June 2018 School Logo Factors that have changed since the last inspection including how ‘inspection key findings’ have been addressed. Steps being taken to minimise Aspect Commentary Evaluation of impact any possible negative impact and improve provision and outcomes. Inspection key finding 1 Inspection key finding 2 Inspection key finding 3 Inspection key finding 4 etc. Other contextual factors x% of pupils have been eligible for The impact to school of the The school is working hard Example given free school meals over the last 6 national statistics is that to mitigate the impact of years, which is well above the they serve as a potential these factors through: national average barrier to learning with a partnership work with significant number of our parents/carers, The school has a deprivation parents/carers being: providing a rich and indicator of x. Compared to 0.40 for unemployed, varied curriculum that the City of Nottingham. However, Nottingham City ranks 20th out of unskilled, motivates and inspires 326 districts in England using the of low aspiration for the learners average deprivation score measure both themselves and safe and secure making it the fourth most deprived their children environment of the core cities. part of chaotic lives development of basic with inconsistent skills and life skills x% of our pupils are in the top 10% routines for children. Whole curriculum and of the Index of Multiple Deprivation This brings diversity to environment in the Early whilst x% of pupils are in the top school as well as offering Years is rich with speaking 30% on the IMD challenge and listening opportunities x% of pupils are from minority as well as providing early ethnic groups and x% are believed intervention through x. to speak a first language not to be English OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS is judged to be Good because: Aspect + Judgement (taken from the OFSTED Commentary (and links to SDP if applicable) Evidence Sources handbook)
School Logo ‘X’ Primary and Nursery School Summary SEF June 2018 Factors that have changed since the last inspection including how ‘inspection key findings’ have been addressed. Aspect Commentary Evaluation of impact Steps being taken to minimise any possible negative impact and improve provision and outcomes. Inspection key finding 1 Inspection key finding 2 Inspection key finding 3 Inspection key finding 4 etc. Other contextual factors Example given x% of pupils have been eligible for free school meals over the last 6 years, which is well above the national average The school has a deprivation indicator of x. Compared to 0.40 for the City of Nottingham. However, Nottingham City ranks 20th out of 326 districts in England using the average deprivation score measure making it the fourth most deprived of the core cities. x% of our pupils are in the top 10% of the Index of Multiple Deprivation whilst x% of pupils are in the top 30% on the IMD x% of pupils are from minority ethnic groups and x% are believed to speak a first language not to be English The impact to school of the national statistics is that they serve as a potential barrier to learning with a significant number of our parents/carers being: unemployed, unskilled, of low aspiration for both themselves and their children part of chaotic lives with inconsistent routines for children. This brings diversity to school as well as offering challenge The school is working hard to mitigate the impact of these factors through: partnership work with parents/carers, providing a rich and varied curriculum that motivates and inspires the learners safe and secure environment development of basic skills and life skills Whole curriculum and environment in the Early Years is rich with speaking and listening opportunities as well as providing early intervention through x. OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS is judged to be Good because: Aspect + Judgement (taken from the OFSTED handbook) Commentary (and links to SDP if applicable) Evidence Sources
Summary-SEF-June-2018-Model-Document-Portrait-Version.docx