Stakeholder response Provision Thanet and Dover Number of responses 8 (12.5% = 1 response) Date of voicing November 17 Disagree Disagree Strongly Strongly The children are happy at this school 0 87.5 12.5 0 Work Scrutiny The children feel safe at this school 25 75 0 0 Students’ work is monitored as part of the quality assurance I receive valuable information from the 50 37.5 12.5 0 process with particular focus on the following: school about the children’s progress My children make good progress at his There is clear identification of the level the 12.5 75 12.5 0 school student is working at and of an appropriate target. This is shown by the Core Sticker located on the front of the The school is well led and managed 87.5 12.5 0 0 book The school responds well to any Learning Objectives are 87.5 12.5 0 0 of an appropriate level. Students concerns I raise are being challenged and working in line with or above The school supports reintegration expectation 87.5 12.5 0 0 effectively Marking is consistent, identifies areas of improvement and the student is engaged with the process. The children return to mainstream with Literacy is supported and is evidenced in book scrutiny improved behaviours and strategies to 37.5 62.5 0 0 and lesson observation. cope Evidence of stretch / extension work The school provides the required Work is presented well on the students’ ability and 50 50 0 0 advice and support for its stakeholders competences regarding handwriting. The school deals with its processes in a 75 25 0 0 timely manner Areas requiring support The school represents value for money 62.5 37.5 0 0 Areas of competence recommended for sharing Audit of formative feedback across the ELA. Identified areas of best Progress over time. The Management Committee to offer Thanet and Dover practice and areas for development. support to the QTLA to ensure progress over time is validated through book scrutiny
Stakeholder response Provision Thanet and Dover Number of responses 8 (12.5% = 1 response) Date of voicing November 17 Strongly Disagree Strongly Disagree The children are happy at this school 0 87.5 12.5 0 The children feel safe at this school 25 75 0 0 I receive valuable information from the school about the children’s progress 50 37.5 12.5 0 My children make good progress at his school 12.5 75 12.5 0 The school is well led and managed 87.5 12.5 0 0 The school responds well to any concerns I raise 87.5 12.5 0 0 The school supports reintegration effectively 87.5 12.5 0 0 The children return to mainstream with improved behaviours and strategies to cope 37.5 62.5 0 0 The school provides the required advice and support for its stakeholders 50 50 0 0 The school deals with its processes in a timely manner 75 25 0 0 The school represents value for money 62.5 37.5 0 0 Work Scrutiny Students’ work is monitored as part of the quality assurance process with particular focus on the following: There is clear identification of the level the student is working at and of an appropriate target. This is shown by the Core Sticker located on the front of the book Learning Objectives are of an appropriate level. Students are being challenged and working in line with or above expectation Marking is consistent, identifies areas of improvement and the student is engaged with the process. Literacy is supported and is evidenced in book scrutiny and lesson observation. Evidence of stretch / extension work Work is presented well on the students’ ability and competences regarding handwriting. Areas of competence recommended for sharing Areas requiring support Thanet and Dover Audit of formative feedback across the ELA. Identified areas of best practice and areas for development. Progress over time. The Management Committee to offer support to the QTLA to ensure progress over time is validated through book scrutiny
Term_3_17-18_QA_1.docx