have provided feedback on Tier I practices within the past 12 months Student/Family/Community Surveys 0 = No documentation (or no Involvement: Stakeholders Voting results from opportunities) for (students, families, and parent/family stakeholder feedback on Tier community members) provide meeting I foundations input on universal foundations Team meeting 1 = Documentation of input on (e.g., expectations, consequences, minutes Tier I foundations, but not acknowledgements) at least every within the past 12 months or 12 months. input but not from all types of stakeholders 2 = Documentation exists that students, families, and community members have provided feedback on Tier I practices within the past 12 months Scoring Criteria Possible Subscale Feature 0 = Not implemented Data Sources 1 = Partially implemented 2 = Fully implemented Discipline Data: Tier I team has School policy 0 = No centralized data system instantaneous access to graphed with ongoing decision Team meeting reports summarizing discipline making exists minutes data organized by the frequency 1 = Data system exists but does Student outcome of problem behavior events by not allow instantaneous data behavior, location, time of day, access to full set of graphed and by individual student. reports 2 = Discipline data system exists that allows instantaneous access to graphs of frequency of problem behavior events by behavior, location, time of day, and student Data-based Decision Making: Data decision rules 0 = No process/protocol exists, or Tier I team reviews and uses professional data are reviewed but not discipline data and academic development used Evaluation outcome data (e.g., 1 = Data reviewed and used for calendar Measures, state tests) at decision-making, but less Staff handbook least monthly for than monthly Team meeting 2 = Team reviews discipline data minutes and uses data for at least monthly. If data indicate an academic or behavior problem, an action plan is developed to enhance or modify Tier I supports Tier I team School policy 0 = No Tier I SWPBIS fidelity Fidelity Data: reviews and uses SWPBIS fidelity Staff handbook data collected
have provided feedback on Tier I practices within the past 12 months Student/Family/Community Involvement: Stakeholders (students, families, and community members) provide input on universal foundations (e.g., expectations, consequences, acknowledgements) at least every 12 months. Surveys Voting results from parent/family meeting Team meeting minutes 0 = No documentation (or no opportunities) for stakeholder feedback on Tier I foundations 1 = Documentation of input on Tier I foundations, but not within the past 12 months or input but not from all types of stakeholders 2 = Documentation exists that students, families, and community members have provided feedback on Tier I practices within the past 12 months Subscale Feature Possible Data Sources Scoring Criteria 0 = Not implemented 1 = Partially implemented 2 = Fully implemented Evaluation Discipline Data: Tier I team has instantaneous access to graphed reports summarizing discipline data organized by the frequency of problem behavior events by behavior, location, time of day, and by individual student. School policy Team meeting minutes Student outcome data 0 = No centralized data system with ongoing decision making exists 1 = Data system exists but does not allow instantaneous access to full set of graphed reports 2 = Discipline data system exists that allows instantaneous access to graphs of frequency of problem behavior events by behavior, location, time of day, and student Data-based Decision Making: Tier I team reviews and uses discipline data and academic outcome data (e.g., Measures, state tests) at least monthly for Data decision rules professional development calendar Staff handbook Team meeting minutes 0 = No process/protocol exists, or data are reviewed but not used 1 = Data reviewed and used for decision-making, but less than monthly 2 = Team reviews discipline data and uses data for at least monthly. If data indicate an academic or behavior problem, an action plan is developed to enhance or modify Tier I supports Fidelity Data: Tier I team reviews and uses SWPBIS fidelity School policy Staff handbook 0 = No Tier I SWPBIS fidelity data collected
2014_09-29_Tiered_Fidelity_Inventory_Version_2_1.docx