[12] I have taken into account that the accused is the first offender and had spent six years and seven months in prison, awaiting his trial and that should count in his favour. In the result, the accused is sentenced as follows: 1 Murder Thirty (30) years imprisonment. – Count 2 Rape Twelve (12) years imprisonment. – Count 3 Theft One (1) year imprisonment. – It is ordered that the sentence in count 3 is to be served concurrently with the sentence in count one. The accused is sentenced to forty two years effective imprisonment. It is further ordered that the exhibits “7”, “8”, “9”, “10”, “11”, “12”, “13”, “14”, “15”, “16”, “17”, and be returned to the lawful owners. “18” “19” ______________________ G N NDAUENDAPO Judge APPEARANCES FOR THE STATE Ms Esterhuizen Of the Office for the Prosecutor General Mr Ujaha FOR ACCUSED Of Mukonda & Associates
[12] I have taken into account that the accused is the first offender and had spent six years and seven months in prison, awaiting his trial and that should count in his favour. In the result, the accused is sentenced as follows: 1 Murder – Thirty (30) years imprisonment. Count 2 Rape – Twelve (12) years imprisonment. Count 3 Theft – One (1) year imprisonment. It is ordered that the sentence in count 3 is to be served concurrently with the sentence in count one. The accused is sentenced to forty two years effective imprisonment. It is further ordered that the exhibits “7”, “8”, “9”, “10”, “11”, “12”, “13”, “14”, “15”, “16”, “17”, “18” and “19” be returned to the lawful owners. ______________________ G N NDAUENDAPO Judge APPEARANCES FOR THE STATE Ms Esterhuizen Of the Office for the Prosecutor General FOR ACCUSED Mr Ujaha Of Mukonda & Associates
State%20v%20Titus%20(CC%2022%20-%202010)%20[2016]%20NAHCMD%20153%20(26%20May%202016).docx