DESCRIPTION KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF VERIFICATION RISKS AND ASSUMPTIONS END OF PROGRAM # of rural road rehabilitation and maintenance 6-monthly progress reports Rural road infrastructure OUTCOME packages tendered by NPC and MPWTC per year, 6-monthly Performance development and maintenance vis-à-vis targets set-out in the annually updated Dialogues are adequately resourced by Selected rural communities RRMPIS. (Not less than 30#/year) Annual independent MRG GoTL, in line with the annually throughout Timor-Leste are reviews updated RRMPIS # (and %) of completed rural road packages that connected by rehabilitated Mid-term and final evaluation Sufficient capacity available meet technical standards per year (24# and 80%) Approved GoTL annual budget within NPC to procure the and systematically # (and %) of eligible bids per tendered package per maintained core rural roads, for rural roads R4D annual program of works year (3# and 60%) – in line with the GoTL Rural Updated RRMPIS (4#) Sufficient staff and operational # (and %) of road package contracts completed Roads Master Plan GIS/IRMIS database budget resources available in on time. (20# and 67%) Field visits DRBFC to supervise the works # of km of core rural rehabilitated roads NPC R4D procurement reports Payment delays to contractors maintained per year (and % of core rural road (4#) are reduced substantially to network), vis-à-vis the targets set-out in the MPS and CS contract mitigate the risk that local annually updated RRMPIS. [Year 1: 400 km (20%), management system contractors are less interested Year 2: 440 km (22%), Year 3: 480 km (24%), Year 4: to tender for R4D works 520 km (26%)]. # (and %) of sukus along R4D rehabilitated and maintained core rural roads compared to total national sukus, vis-à-vis the targets set-out in the annually updated RRMPIS [Year 1: 130 (30%), Year 2: 150 (34%), Year 3: 170 (38%), Year 4: 190 (43%)].
DESCRIPTION KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF VERIFICATION RISKS AND ASSUMPTIONS END OF PROGRAM OUTCOME Selected rural communities throughout Timor-Leste are connected by rehabilitated and systematically maintained core rural roads, in line with the GoTL Rural Roads Master Plan # of rural road rehabilitation and maintenance packages tendered by NPC and MPWTC per year, vis-à-vis targets set-out in the annually updated RRMPIS. (Not less than 30#/year) 6-monthly progress reports 6-monthly Performance Dialogues Annual independent MRG reviews Mid-term and final evaluation Approved GoTL annual budget for rural roads – R4D Updated RRMPIS (4#) GIS/IRMIS database Field visits NPC R4D procurement reports (4#) MPS and CS contract management system Rural road infrastructure development and maintenance are adequately resourced by GoTL, in line with the annually updated RRMPIS Sufficient capacity available within NPC to procure the annual program of works Sufficient staff and operational budget resources available in DRBFC to supervise the works Payment delays to contractors are reduced substantially to mitigate the risk that local contractors are less interested to tender for R4D works # (and %) of completed rural road packages that meet technical standards per year (24# and 80%) # (and %) of eligible bids per tendered package per year (3# and 60%) # (and %) of road package contracts completed on time. (20# and 67%) # of km of core rural rehabilitated roads maintained per year (and % of core rural road network), vis-à-vis the targets set-out in the annually updated RRMPIS. [Year 1: 400 km (20%), Year 2: 440 km (22%), Year 3: 480 km (24%), Year 4: 520 km (26%)]. # (and %) of sukus along R4D rehabilitated and maintained core rural roads compared to total national sukus, vis-à-vis the targets set-out in the annually updated RRMPIS [Year 1: 130 (30%), Year 2: 150 (34%), Year 3: 170 (38%), Year 4: 190 (43%)].
timor-leste-roads-for-development-design-update-annex.docx