organisational goals and to match this. 4. Off campus students - Ella what does anusa do with griffin hall? Cam - Nothing explicit in our constitution – Karan analysis, what type of events work? Anusa surveys, let’s think strat – 5. Training/handover/development Cam consultations. Anusa needs more specific training. – Karan pros/cons on this. Can we do research. Annika looking to involve Eleanor, having – – actual handover document here. Ella gen rep handover. Each one, personal experiences and contacts – 6. Exec/office management Cam. Already started this – Karan employed person. Having this one come to src and do a report. – Ray clarifying goals, how do we do this? Involve as many people, speak to incoming team – Cam report was good to express some issues that we already had. Was quite broad. Would – like to see process to answer questions. Procedural First Ella – Second Ben – Passed. 4.1.3 Academic Exclusion That ANUSA condemns any increase to the academic exclusion period without any evidence that it would improve the educational outcomes of excluded students. First: Cam Second: Gabby Cam report went up last night. Marnie keen to increase period to 3 years. Paula – and Richard unsure. Don’t have data as of yet, concerned about being done off anecdotal experience. Should oppose it whilst they have no reason. Could improve graduation rates. Gabby waived speaking right – Questions Laura W DoS, RB have they advocated against it? – – Cam didn’t want to misquote them – Laura W what sort of data should they produce? – Cam what grad rates/drop out rates who have already been excluded. Do have – the ability to get it. Laura W academic research on it? – Cam can ask about it. Marnie didn’t mention this but will follow through. – Joyce average for other uni’s? – Cam no, academic exclusion from all universities. – Passed by everyone. ANUSA recommends that the university improve their communication around academic exclusion, particularly of special consideration provisions. First: Cam
organisational goals and to match this. 4. Off campus students - Ella – what does anusa do with griffin hall? Cam - Nothing explicit in our constitution Karan – analysis, what type of events work? Anusa surveys, let’s think strat 5. Training/handover/development Cam – consultations. Anusa needs more specific training. Karan – pros/cons on this. Can we do research. Annika – looking to involve Eleanor, having actual handover document here. Ella – gen rep handover. Each one, personal experiences and contacts 6. Exec/office management – Cam. Already started this Karan – employed person. Having this one come to src and do a report. Ray – clarifying goals, how do we do this? Involve as many people, speak to incoming team Cam – report was good to express some issues that we already had. Was quite broad. Would like to see process to answer questions. Procedural First – Ella Second – Ben Passed. 4.1.3 Academic Exclusion That ANUSA condemns any increase to the academic exclusion period without any evidence that it would improve the educational outcomes of excluded students. First: Cam Second: Gabby Cam – report went up last night. Marnie keen to increase period to 3 years. Paula and Richard unsure. Don’t have data as of yet, concerned about being done off anecdotal experience. Should oppose it whilst they have no reason. Could improve graduation rates. Gabby – waived speaking right Questions Laura W – DoS, RB – have they advocated against it? Cam – didn’t want to misquote them Laura W – what sort of data should they produce? Cam – what grad rates/drop out rates who have already been excluded. Do have the ability to get it. Laura W – academic research on it? Cam – can ask about it. Marnie didn’t mention this but will follow through. Joyce – average for other uni’s? Cam – no, academic exclusion from all universities. Passed by everyone. ANUSA recommends that the university improve their communication around academic exclusion, particularly of special consideration provisions. First: Cam
SRC-7-Minutes-24-September-2014.docx