Are roles, responsibilities and protocols for use and access to communication systems ☐ ☐ Yes No in the EAP agreed? Does the communication system/s in the EAP support the continuous flow of ☐ ☐ Yes No date critical information between key stakeholders? ☐ ☐ Is there a redundancy in place for primary communication system/s? Yes No Are the communications system/s responsive to the range of reasonably foreseeable ☐ ☐ Yes No operating environments for the dam location? Are the communities at risk of impact of a dam hazard or emergency event profiled to ☐ ☐ Yes No identify and define groups? ☐ ☐ Are there any identified barriers to communication outlined in the EAP? Yes No Does the EAP outline that the warning messages and systems are regularly reviewed, ☐ ☐ Yes No tested and exercised? Are the warning messages in the EAP delivered by entities with the authority to do so, ☐ ☐ Yes No in line with agreed documented roles and responsibilities? Does the dam owner value-add to warnings with appropriate local context and ☐ ☐ Yes No content and tailor dissemination approaches to local needs? TEMPLATE: Local Government Notice to a Dam Owner LOCAL GOVERNMENT NOTICE TO DAM OWNER Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008, Section 352HB 1. <<INSERT NAME OF COUNCIL>> (the Council) was given a copy of an emergency action plan (EAP) for <<insert name of dam>>, <<version number>> by <<insert dam owner name>> on <<insert date copy EAP received>> to assess its consistency with the disaster Council’s management plan. 2. This notice is given under section 352HB of the Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008 (Qld). 3. The Council considers the EAP is consistent with the local disaster management government’s plan <<OR>> The Council considers the EAP is not consistent with the local disaster management government’s
Are roles, responsibilities and protocols for use and access to communication systems in the EAP agreed? Yes ☐ No ☐ Does the communication system/s in the EAP support the continuous flow of critical information between key stakeholders? Yes ☐ No ☐ Is there a redundancy in place for primary communication system/s? Yes ☐ No ☐ Are the communications system/s responsive to the range of reasonably foreseeable operating environments for the dam location? Yes ☐ No ☐ Are the communities at risk of impact of a dam hazard or emergency event profiled to identify and define groups? Yes ☐ No ☐ Are there any identified barriers to communication outlined in the EAP? Yes ☐ No ☐ Does the EAP outline that the warning messages and systems are regularly reviewed, tested and exercised? Yes ☐ No ☐ Are the warning messages in the EAP delivered by entities with the authority to do so, in line with agreed documented roles and responsibilities? Yes ☐ No ☐ Does the dam owner value-add to warnings with appropriate local context and content and tailor dissemination approaches to local needs? Yes ☐ No ☐ TEMPLATE: Local Government Notice to a Dam Owner LOCAL GOVERNMENT NOTICE TO DAM OWNER Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008, Section 352HB 1. <<INSERT NAME OF COUNCIL>> (the Council) was given a copy of an emergency action plan (EAP) for <<insert name of dam>>, <<version number>> by <<insert dam owner name>> on <<insert date copy EAP received>> to assess its consistency with the Council’s disaster management plan. 2. This notice is given under section 352HB of the Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008 (Qld). 3. The Council considers the EAP is consistent with the local government’s disaster management plan <<OR>> The Council considers the EAP is not consistent with the local government’s disaster management date
support-tool-local-government.docx