understanding and and thorough punctuation. proofreading. 6. EP Oral Evidence Evidence Evidence Presentation shows that: shows that: shows that: Candidates Candidates Candidates ACEI-5.1 clearly and clearly do not concisely articulate explain their articulate key personal personal aspects of philosophy. philosophy personal Candidates clearly and philosophy present parts sufficiently. including of the EP Candidates discussion of that do not at least one demonstrate present EP educational both adequately dilemma. personal and do not Candidates philosophy demonstrate fluidly access and personal parts of the EP successful philosophy that completion and demonstrate of SPA successful both standards. completion philosophy Candidates of SPA and successful answer standards. completion of follow-up Candidates SPA questions do not standards. using the EP answer Candidates to support follow-up confidently responses. questions answer Candidates clearly and questions give fully. using the EP overview of Candidates to support entire EP but do not use responses. direct EP artifacts Candidates attention to to support give brief most key responses. overview of examples of Candidates entire EP but own work do not direct attention and impact present the to key on P-12 entire EP and examples of student do not own work and learning. address key impact on examples of student own work learning. and impact
understanding and thorough proofreading. and punctuation. 6. EP Oral Presentation ACEI-5.1 Evidence shows that: Candidates clearly and concisely articulate key aspects of personal philosophy including discussion of at least one educational dilemma. Candidates fluidly access parts of the EP that demonstrate both philosophy and successful completion of SPA standards. Candidates confidently answer questions using the EP to support responses. Candidates give brief overview of entire EP but direct attention to key examples of own work and impact on student learning. Evidence shows that: Candidates clearly articulate personal philosophy. Candidates present parts of the EP that demonstrate both personal philosophy and successful completion of SPA standards. Candidates answer follow-up questions using the EP to support responses. Candidates give overview of entire EP but direct attention to most key examples of own work and impact on P-12 student learning. Evidence shows that: Candidates do not explain their personal philosophy clearly and sufficiently. Candidates do not present EP adequately and do not demonstrate personal philosophy and successful completion of SPA standards. Candidates do not answer follow-up questions clearly and fully. Candidates do not use EP artifacts to support responses. Candidates do not present the entire EP and do not address key examples of own work and impact
ST%20HB%20F14_9-3-14%20.docx