- Hospital 2 none or below 0 Hardly above 1 well above 2 sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) FDS data 0 none 0 Sample below 1 Sample above 2 minimum minimum expected expected (<3000) (3000+) C. Total score (max. 20) 16 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS 2 no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 data collection continue in 2016? - Improvement 2 None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial 2 Sample bias or maintenance improvements shall be plan in place necessary controlled in for next years? order to provide national IR - Legal basis for 1 No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 unclear MDS data substantial very likely collection? discussion - Capacities in 1 Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay 1 Sufficient or 2 Less capacities your the same will increase for FDS, but organization for more for MDS injury data collection/ analysis? - Interest to 2 no 0 Yes, but 1 Yes, we 2 participate in depending on remain future EU injury availability of strongly information internal interested projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 8 Very good system due to the opportunity to extract MDS from Summary public hospital statistics. Main shortcomings are the lack of Implementation national estimates (IRs) and FDS data. However, it is planned to Assessment control the bias of public hospitals and to provide IRs also retrospectively. Signatures Function Place, date Name Signature National IDB data OK for JAMIE final Nicosia Pavlos Pavlou administrator score card June 2014 Vienna, 16 October BRIDGE-Health IDB Rupert Kisser OK 2015
- Hospital sample size none or below advised minimum 0 Hardly above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 1 well above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 2 2 FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 0 C. Total score (max. 20) 16 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2016? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 2 - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial improvements necessary 2 2 Sample bias shall be controlled in order to provide national IR - Legal basis for MDS data collection? No plans 0 Ongoing substantial discussion 1 In place or very likely 2 1 unclear - Capacities in your organization for injury data collection/ analysis? Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay the same 1 Sufficient or will increase 2 1 Less capacities for FDS, but more for MDS - Interest to participate in future EU injury information projects? no 0 Yes, but depending on availability of internal resources 1 Yes, we remain strongly interested 2 2 D. Total score (max. 10) 8 Summary Implementation Assessment Very good system due to the opportunity to extract MDS from public hospital statistics. Main shortcomings are the lack of national estimates (IRs) and FDS data. However, it is planned to control the bias of public hospitals and to provide IRs also retrospectively. Signatures Function Place, date Name Signature National IDB data administrator Nicosia Pavlos Pavlou OK for JAMIE final score card June 2014 BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, 16 October 2015 Rupert Kisser OK
Sustainability%20Report.docx