Cochrane consumption the normal clinical setting participants) confirmed the benefit of Boards, but (3) Alcohol and in research settings brief intervention in men (mean there is some however Database of related harm to with greater resources. difference: -57 grams/week, 95% nationally guided these are Systematic the drinkers or Longer counselling had little CI: -89 to -25, I2 = 56%), but not in delivery. Reviews to affected additional benefit. Future women (mean difference: -10 type trials others trials should focus on grams/week, 95% CI: -48 to 29, I2 Primary care and not in women and on delineating = 45%). a service Children and Secondary the most effective delivery young adults outcomes components of context. (4) Patient interventions. Working age satisfaction adults (5) quality of life (6) Economic measures including use of health services Moreira MT, Primary Web/computer feedback Twenty-two studies were included P D. The outcomes and individual face to face (7,275 participants). evidence Smith LA, Alcohol use and feedback are probably This is Foxcroft D, misuse as effective in reducing alcohol Significant reduction in alcohol 2009 intervention is measured by misuse. related problems (SMD -0.31 95%Cl and it is currently self-reported The results were not -0.59 to -0.02), peak blood alcohol Social norms not measures of significant for mailed and content (SMD-0.77 95%Cl -1.25 to interventions being possible to consumption group feedback and for drinking frequency (SMD to reduce draw a implemented Secondary social norms marketing 95%Cl -0.63 to -0.13) and alcohol misuse conclusion outcomes campaigns. drinking quantity (SMD -0.35 95% Cl as a trial in University but there Measures of -0.51 to -0.18) with web/computer
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Primary care Children and young adults Working age adults consumption (3) Alcohol related harm to the drinkers or to affected others Secondary outcomes (4) Patient satisfaction (5) quality of life (6) Economic measures including use of health services the normal clinical setting and in research settings with greater resources. Longer counselling had little additional benefit. Future trials should focus on women and on delineating the most effective components of interventions. participants) confirmed the benefit of brief intervention in men (mean difference: -57 grams/week, 95% CI: -89 to -25, I2 = 56%), but not in women (mean difference: -10 grams/week, 95% CI: -48 to 29, I2 = 45%). Boards, but there is some nationally guided delivery. however these are trials and not in a service delivery context. Moreira MT, Smith LA, Foxcroft D, 2009 Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in University Primary outcomes Alcohol use and misuse as measured by self-reported measures of consumption Secondary outcomes Measures of Web/computer feedback and individual face to face feedback are probably effective in reducing alcohol misuse. The results were not significant for mailed and group feedback and for social norms marketing campaigns. Twenty-two studies were included (7,275 participants). Significant reduction in alcohol related problems (SMD -0.31 95%Cl -0.59 to -0.02), peak blood alcohol content (SMD-0.77 95%Cl -1.25 to drinking frequency (SMD 95%Cl -0.63 to -0.13) and drinking quantity (SMD -0.35 95% Cl -0.51 to -0.18) with web/computer P This intervention is currently being implemented as a trial D. The evidence is and it is not possible to draw a conclusion but there type
Substance%20misuse%20alcohol%20Evidence%20Review%20Final.docx