delivery) 2 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper 1 Reference 2 Yes or not for last population file delivery for 2016 1 - Consistency of IR not available 0 not consistent or 1 Consistent 2 Yes case definition unclear (IDB & HDR or EDR) 2 Scope of data Two or more Just one No 2 Yes “warning collection “warning flags” “warning flag” flag” 2 - FDS sample Not available 0 Not yet but 1 Complete and 2 Yes 2016 expected in time B. Total score (max. 14) 12 C. Current system in place (2017) Score Comments 2 Data collection 0 1 2 no data & no plan no data but Collected & Yes ongoing to (re)start restart planned / delivery data delivery certain uncertain 2 - Age groups not covering the 0 All ages in most 1 all ages in all 2 Yes full age-span of the hospitals hospitals 2 Yes - Injury less than 0 At least home, 1 all injuries 2 categories leisure & school 2 Yes - Outpatients none or strongly 0 biased toward 1 All HDs + all 2 biased toward HD but EDs HD corrected for IR 2 Yes - Completeness more than 1 code 0 just one missing 1 all codes 2 of coding missing implemented (mechanism, injury type, body part) 1 Yes - Incidence rates 0 1 2 IR not available only crude rate standardized or based on for age and catchment sex 2 Yes Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a 1 Valid at 2 region national level 1 Yes Sampling of Just by 0 rational 1 Validated 2 hospitals availability of sampling but no sample hospitals validation check 2 Yes - Hospital none or below 0 Hardly above 1 well above 2 sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) 2 Yes FDS data none 0 Sample below 1 Sample above 2 minimum minimum expected expected (<3000) (3000+) C. Total score (max. 20) 18 D. Prospects for 2018+ Score Comments 2 Yes - Will the MDS 0 1 2 no Not secured yet yes data collection continue in 2018? 2 Yes - Improvement None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no 2
delivery) Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper or not for last delivery 1 Reference population file for 2016 2 2 Yes - Consistency of case definition (IDB & HDR or EDR) IR not available 0 not consistent or unclear 1 Consistent 2 1 Yes Scope of data collection Two or more “warning flags” Just one “warning flag” No “warning flag” 2 2 Yes - FDS sample 2016 Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 Complete and in time 2 2 Yes B. Total score (max. 14) 12 C. Current system in place (2017) Score Comments Data collection ongoing no data & no plan to (re)start 0 no data but restart planned / data delivery uncertain 1 Collected & delivery certain 2 2 Yes - Age groups not covering the full age-span 0 All ages in most of the hospitals 1 all ages in all hospitals 2 2 Yes - Injury categories less than 0 At least home, leisure & school 1 all injuries 2 2 Yes - Outpatients none or strongly biased toward HD 0 biased toward HD but corrected for IR 1 All HDs + all EDs 2 2 Yes - Completeness of coding (mechanism, injury type, body part) more than 1 code missing 0 just one missing 1 all codes implemented 2 2 Yes - Incidence rates IR not available 0 only crude rate or based on catchment 1 standardized for age and sex 2 1 Yes Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a region 1 Valid at national level 2 2 Yes Sampling of hospitals Just by availability of hospitals 0 rational sampling but no validation check 1 Validated sample 2 1 Yes - Hospital sample size none or below advised minimum 0 Hardly above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 1 well above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 2 2 Yes FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 2 Yes C. Total score (max. 20) 18 D. Prospects for 2018+ Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2018? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 2 Yes - Improvement None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no 2 2 Yes
Sustainability%20Report.docx