National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: CZECH REPUBLIC August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as 2 not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 observer or full of member (2015) - Participation 0 0 1 2 2 or less of the 3-4 of the at least 5 Only first NDA level in past seven meetings meetings meetings meeting. five years attended attended attended - Government 0 No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 endorsement support of term perspective for endorsement - Responsive to 1 only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 3 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered 2 none 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 2011+2012 in past five for just one year for two or delivered as years more years Excel - MDS data 2014 1 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 complete and 2 Not yet delivered expected in time - Accuracy of 2 more than 40% 0 between 10% 1 less than 10% 2 To be checked coding (most unknown and 40% unknown current unknown delivery) Incidence rate 0 Not available 0 Only on paper 1 Reference 2 or not for last population file delivery for 2014 - Consistency of 1 IR not available 0 not consistent or 1 Fully 2 case definition unclear consistent (IDB & HDR or EDR) Scope of data 0 Two or more Just one No 2 Only 0-18, only “warning collection admissions “warning flags” “warning flag” flag” - FDS sample 1 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 Complete and 2 Not yet 2014 expected in time B. Total score (max. 14) 7 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection 2 0 1 2 no data & no plan no data but Collected &
National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: CZECH REPUBLIC August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the seven meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 0 Only first NDA meeting. - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 0 - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 1 A. Total score (max. 8) 3 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered in past five years none 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 2 2011+2012 delivered as Excel - MDS data 2014 delivered Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 complete and in time 2 1 Not yet - Accuracy of coding (most current delivery) more than 40% unknown 0 between 10% and 40% unknown 1 less than 10% unknown 2 2 To be checked Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper or not for last delivery 1 Reference population file for 2014 2 0 - Consistency of case definition (IDB & HDR or EDR) IR not available 0 not consistent or unclear 1 Fully consistent 2 1 Scope of data collection Two or more “warning flags” Just one “warning flag” No “warning flag” 2 0 Only 0-18, only admissions - FDS sample 2014 Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 Complete and in time 2 1 Not yet B. Total score (max. 14) 7 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection no data & no plan 0 no data but 1 Collected & 2 2
Sustainability%20Report.docx