HUMAN RIGHTS MODULE SUMMATIVE ASSIGNMENT (2015) (Marks: 70) INSTRUCTION’S SUMMATIVE ASSIGNMENT (2015) (Marks: 50) • INSTRUCTION’S • All assessed coursework is to be typewritten and must contain an accurate word count and bibliography. The deadline for submission is Sunday 27th March 2017 (Till 3:00pm) (No excuse for late submission will • be accepted or marked At Any Cost) The word limit is 6,000 words (to exclude footnotes, references and bibliography). • regarding deduction of marks for exceeding word limits. Please note the Law School’s regulations Please consult your lecturer for further rules on essay presentation. • All assessed coursework should be written in your own words; any kind of plagiarism will not only lead to failure, but also prohibit your degree. “As stipulated by HEC” (It is expected that the answer to the following question[s] will necessitate private research and reading beyond the material listed on the seminar sheets / PPT/ folder’s). Please read the following essay titles carefully. Answer one question only. Failure to properly address the question in the exact terms in which it is set may lead to a fail mark. Jeremy Bentham's assessment of the French revolutionaries' was and with all due respect to “NONSENSE upon stilts”. Philosophically, Bentham, it is difficult to make clear-cut distinctions between the and the traditional “first-generation” rights newer “second-generation” variety. The idea that only first-generation rights lend themselves to legal codification is wrong. Certainly, they lend themselves to it far more easily, because the adjudications they require are simpler. But in many
HUMAN RIGHTS MODULE SUMMATIVE ASSIGNMENT (2015) (Marks: 70) INSTRUCTION’S • SUMMATIVE ASSIGNMENT (2015) (Marks: 50) INSTRUCTION’S • All assessed coursework is to be typewritten and must contain an accurate word count and bibliography. • The deadline for submission is Sunday 27th March 2017 (Till 3:00pm) (No excuse for late submission will be accepted or marked At Any Cost) • The word limit is 6,000 words (to exclude footnotes, references and bibliography). Please note the Law School’s regulations regarding deduction of marks for exceeding word limits. • Please consult your lecturer for further rules on essay presentation. All assessed coursework should be written in your own words; any kind of plagiarism will not only lead to failure, but also prohibit your degree. “As stipulated by HEC” (It is expected that the answer to the following question[s] will necessitate private research and reading beyond the material listed on the seminar sheets / PPT/ folder’s). Please read the following essay titles carefully. Answer one question only. Failure to properly address the question in the exact terms in which it is set may lead to a fail mark. Jeremy Bentham's assessment of the French revolutionaries' was “NONSENSE upon stilts”. Philosophically, and with all due respect to Bentham, it is difficult to make clear-cut distinctions between the traditional “first-generation” rights and the newer “second-generation” variety. The idea that only first-generation rights lend themselves to legal codification is wrong. Certainly, they lend themselves to it far more easily, because the adjudications they require are simpler. But in many
Summative-2016-March-3.docx