2. Discussion of Evidence shows that: Evidence shows that: Evidence shows that: Problematic Candidates clearly state Candidates clearly state Candidates do not Situation and problematic situation problematic situation describe problematic Dilemma and provide multiple and provide at least 1 situation clearly with examples of each example of each sufficient examples. ACEI-5.1 behavior documented. behavior documented. Candidates identify a Candidates provide rich Candidates identify at dilemma not related description of dilemma least 1 dilemma related to the issue. based on research. to the issue. Candidates Candidates do not Candidates identify well identify ARP problem identify an ARP defined ARP problem statement. problem statement. statement in terms of measurable behaviors. 3. Identifying Evidence that: Evidence shows that: Evidence shows that: Causes Candidates use rich and Candidates use Candidates use varied data to support observational data to insufficient data to broad range of possible support broad range of support limited range causes. Candidates possible causes. of possible causes. show how some Candidates include Candidates presume observations support special needs as special needs more than one possible possible causes but do categorization without interpretation. not categorize students supporting formal Candidates include without supporting assessment. special needs as formal assessment. Candidates do not possible causes but do Candidates organize organize data in a not categorize students data to aid reader meaningful manner without supporting understanding. that aids reader formal assessment. understanding. Candidates organize data to clearly aid reader understanding. 4. Pre/Post Data Evidence shows that: Evidence shows that: Evidence shows that: Collection and Candidates clearly Candidates clearly Candidates do not Analysis identify pre/post identify pre/post identify pre/post measure(s) appropriate measure appropriate for measure appropriate ACEI-4.0 for stated problem stated problem for stated problem statement. Candidates statement. Candidates statement. Candidates identify additional data discuss additional data do not consider sources to show clear sources. additional data plan for triangulation. sources.
2. Discussion of Problematic Situation and Dilemma ACEI-5.1 Evidence shows that: Candidates clearly state problematic situation and provide multiple examples of each behavior documented. Candidates provide rich description of dilemma based on research. Candidates identify well defined ARP problem statement in terms of measurable behaviors. Evidence shows that: Candidates clearly state problematic situation and provide at least 1 example of each behavior documented. Candidates identify at least 1 dilemma related to the issue. Candidates identify ARP problem statement. Evidence shows that: Candidates do not describe problematic situation clearly with sufficient examples. Candidates identify a dilemma not related to the issue. Candidates do not identify an ARP problem statement. 3. Identifying Causes Evidence that: Candidates use rich and varied data to support broad range of possible causes. Candidates show how some observations support more than one possible interpretation. Candidates include special needs as possible causes but do not categorize students without supporting formal assessment. Candidates organize data to clearly aid reader understanding. Evidence shows that: Candidates use observational data to support broad range of possible causes. Candidates include special needs as possible causes but do not categorize students without supporting formal assessment. Candidates organize data to aid reader understanding. Evidence shows that: Candidates use insufficient data to support limited range of possible causes. Candidates presume special needs categorization without supporting formal assessment. Candidates do not organize data in a meaningful manner that aids reader understanding. 4. Pre/Post Data Collection and Analysis ACEI-4.0 Evidence shows that: Candidates clearly identify pre/post measure(s) appropriate for stated problem statement. Candidates identify additional data sources to show clear plan for triangulation. Evidence shows that: Candidates clearly identify pre/post measure appropriate for stated problem statement. Candidates discuss additional data sources. Evidence shows that: Candidates do not identify pre/post measure appropriate for stated problem statement. Candidates do not consider additional data sources.
ST%20HB%20F14_9-3-14%20.docx