ongoing to (re)start restart planned / delivery data delivery certain uncertain - Age groups 2 not covering the 0 All ages in most 1 all ages in all 2 full age-span of the hospitals hospitals - Injury 2 less than 0 At least home, 1 all injuries 2 categories leisure & school - Outpatients 2 none or strongly 0 biased toward 1 All HDs + all 2 biased toward HD but EDs HD corrected for IR - Completeness 2 more than 1 code 0 just one missing 1 all codes 2 of coding missing implemented (mechanism, injury type, body part) - Incidence rates 2 IR not available 0 only crude rate 1 standardized 2 or based on for age and catchment sex Geo-coverage 2 IR not available 0 Valid only for a 1 Valid at 2 Two of two region national level hospitals Sampling of 2 Just by 0 rational 1 Validated 2 hospitals availability of sampling but no sample hospitals validation check - Hospital 2 none or below 0 Hardly above 1 well above 2 sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) FDS data 2 0 1 2 none Sample below Sample above FDS>MDS minimum minimum expected expected (<3000) (3000+) C. Total score (max. 20) 20 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS 2 no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 data collection continue in 2016? - Improvement 2 None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial 2 or maintenance improvements plan in place necessary for next years? - Legal basis for 2 No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 Implemented by MDS data substantial very likely administrative collection? discussion act - Capacities in 1 0 1 2 Will be reduced Scarce but stay Sufficient or your the same will increase organization for injury data collection/ analysis? - Interest to 2 no 0 Yes, but 1 Yes, we 2 participate in depending on remain future EU injury availability of strongly
ongoing to (re)start restart planned / data delivery uncertain delivery certain - Age groups not covering the full age-span 0 All ages in most of the hospitals 1 all ages in all hospitals 2 2 - Injury categories less than 0 At least home, leisure & school 1 all injuries 2 2 - Outpatients none or strongly biased toward HD 0 biased toward HD but corrected for IR 1 All HDs + all EDs 2 2 - Completeness of coding (mechanism, injury type, body part) more than 1 code missing 0 just one missing 1 all codes implemented 2 2 - Incidence rates IR not available 0 only crude rate or based on catchment 1 standardized for age and sex 2 2 Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a region 1 Valid at national level 2 2 Two of two hospitals Sampling of hospitals Just by availability of hospitals 0 rational sampling but no validation check 1 Validated sample 2 2 - Hospital sample size none or below advised minimum 0 Hardly above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 1 well above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 2 2 FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 2 FDS>MDS C. Total score (max. 20) 20 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2016? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 2 - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial improvements necessary 2 2 - Legal basis for MDS data collection? No plans 0 Ongoing substantial discussion 1 In place or very likely 2 2 Implemented by administrative act - Capacities in your organization for injury data collection/ analysis? Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay the same 1 Sufficient or will increase 2 1 - Interest to participate in future EU injury no 0 Yes, but depending on availability of 1 Yes, we remain strongly 2 2
Sustainability%20Report.docx