One biomass-based electricity studies and contracts the private pilot plant contracts and permits of project outputs, the project’s time horizon; (2) generator (5 MW) has been for pilot under consideration; concluded for the monitoring reports Conflicting interests would keep installed, supplying energy to electricity envisaged pilot plant; the Government from (B) Envisaged pilot the national grid, and a generator; implementing a stimulating biomass plant in (B) One 5-MW pilot mechanism for widespread framework for biomass. (B) One pilot prefeasibility stage; biomass plant replication has been prepared. generating plant constructed and Assumptions: (1) Existing (C) Recent Decrees constructed and supplying electricity to experience in Uruguay and invite companies to supplying power to the grid; commitment of private investors present small biomass the national grid; ensure a fast development of the projects on an ad-hoc (C) A policy framework in pilot biomass generator based on (C) Stimulating policy basis; incentives are place allowing the forestry residues; (2) The newly instruments in place non-continuous; widespread elected Government is sufficiently enabling additional Several tax incentives implementation of strong to push forward its capacity to be in place. distributed biomass biomass development plans. installed; plants over a longer (D) Lack of data and timeframe; (D) Detailed technical experience in Uruguay information on concerning field (D) Detailed field data operation parameters performance of small, have been collected of distributed biomass grid-connected regarding operational plants. biomass generators. safety, dispatch, GHG benefits, economy and reliability of distributed biomass generators. Outcome 5 (A) Mid-term (A) No MTE; (A) MTE completed; Evaluation reports Risks: No specific risks have been Evaluation Report; identified related to UNDP/GEF A project monitoring and (B) No FEV; (B) FEV completed; M&E. evaluation plan implemented, (B) Final Evaluation (C) No systematization (C) Lessons learnt and lessons learnt are Report; Assumptions: (1) project of lessons-learnt on publication; disseminated. stakeholders correctly understand (C) Documentation of distributed biomass UNDP/GEF M&E principles; (2) (D) Seminar to present project experiences; plants in Uruguay; national counterparts are project results. committed to the objectives of (D) Sharing of project (D) No sharing of the Project. results. biomass experiences in the region.
One biomass-based electricity generator (5 MW) has been installed, supplying energy to the national grid, and a mechanism for widespread replication has been prepared. studies and contracts for pilot electricity generator; (B) One pilot generating plant constructed and supplying power to the national grid; (C) Stimulating policy instruments in place enabling additional capacity to be installed; (D) Detailed technical information on operation parameters of distributed biomass plants. the private pilot plant under consideration; (B) Envisaged pilot biomass plant in prefeasibility stage; (C) Recent Decrees invite companies to present small biomass projects on an ad-hoc basis; incentives are non-continuous; Several tax incentives in place. (D) Lack of data and experience in Uruguay concerning field performance of small, grid-connected biomass generators. contracts and permits concluded for the envisaged pilot plant; (B) One 5-MW pilot biomass plant constructed and supplying electricity to the grid; (C) A policy framework in place allowing the widespread implementation of distributed biomass plants over a longer timeframe; (D) Detailed field data have been collected regarding operational safety, dispatch, GHG benefits, economy and reliability of distributed biomass generators. of project outputs, monitoring reports the project’s time horizon; (2) Conflicting interests would keep the Government from implementing a stimulating framework for biomass. Assumptions: (1) Existing experience in Uruguay and commitment of private investors ensure a fast development of the pilot biomass generator based on forestry residues; (2) The newly elected Government is sufficiently strong to push forward its biomass development plans. Outcome 5 A project monitoring and evaluation plan implemented, and lessons learnt are disseminated. (A) Mid-term Evaluation Report; (B) Final Evaluation Report; (C) Documentation of project experiences; (D) Sharing of project results. (A) No MTE; (B) No FEV; (C) No systematization of lessons-learnt on distributed biomass plants in Uruguay; (D) No sharing of biomass experiences in the region. (A) MTE completed; (B) FEV completed; (C) Lessons learnt publication; (D) Seminar to present project results. Evaluation reports Risks: No specific risks have been identified related to UNDP/GEF M&E. Assumptions: (1) project stakeholders correctly understand UNDP/GEF M&E principles; (2) national counterparts are committed to the objectives of the Project.
Terminal%2520Evaluation_PROBIO_English_FINAL%2520%25282%2529_0.docx