10. Discipline incidents number of suspensions and/or – 109 (23%) 20% 17% 14% 11% 8% expulsions Baseline 109 of 475 = 23% of enrollment 11. Truants number of unduplicated students who have – 10 8 7 6 5 4 received truancy letters or action, enter as a whole number 12. Distribution of teachers by performance level on Data will not be LEA’s 4 Highly teacher evaluation system. (Please indicate available until late individual 5 Highly 6 Highly 7 Highly 8 Highly Effective number of Ineffective [IN], Improvement Necessary summer, as evaluations Effective Effective Effective Effective [IMP], Effective [EF], and Highly Effective [HEF].) include 2015 ISTEP+ new principal & new expectations performance & growth 25Effective 25Effective 24 Effective 23 Effective results. 25 Effective 1 0 0 0 Tentative spring data Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement 2 Improvement shows: Needed Needed Needed Needed Needed Highly-Effective 8 Effective 18 0 Ineffective 0 Ineffective 0 Ineffective 0 Ineffective 0 Ineffective Improvement Needed 4 Ineffective 1 13. Teacher attendance rate 96.8% 97% 97.2% 97.4% 97.6% 98% (must be a percentage between 0.00 and 100.00) For the following categories, please demonstrate (1) how the LEA has analyzed specific needs for instructional programs, school leadership, and school infrastructure and (2) justification for the selected interventions for these areas. Each area should be tied back to data above and address the subgroup needs identified. Instructional Programs
10. Discipline incidents – number of suspensions and/or expulsions Baseline 109 of 475 = 23% of enrollment 109 (23%) 20% 17% 14% 11% 8% 11. Truants – number of unduplicated students who have received truancy letters or action, enter as a whole number 10 8 7 6 5 4 12. Distribution of teachers by performance level on LEA’s teacher evaluation system. (Please indicate individual number of Ineffective [IN], Improvement Necessary [IMP], Effective [EF], and Highly Effective [HEF].) Data will not be available until late summer, as evaluations include 2015 ISTEP+ performance & growth results. Tentative spring data shows: Highly-Effective 8 Effective 18 Improvement Needed 4 Ineffective 1 4 Highly Effective new principal & new expectations 25 Effective 2 Improvement Needed 0 Ineffective 5 Highly Effective 25Effective 1 Improvement Needed 0 Ineffective 6 Highly Effective 25Effective 0 Improvement Needed 0 Ineffective 7 Highly Effective 24 Effective 0 Improvement Needed 0 Ineffective 8 Highly Effective 23 Effective 0 Improvement Needed 0 Ineffective 13. Teacher attendance rate (must be a percentage between 0.00 and 100.00) 96.8% 97% 97.2% 97.4% 97.6% 98% For the following categories, please demonstrate (1) how the LEA has analyzed specific needs for instructional programs, school leadership, and school infrastructure and (2) justification for the selected interventions for these areas. Each area should be tied back to data above and address the subgroup needs identified. Instructional Programs
sunny-heights-elementary-sig-application-ac.docx