Another advantage of this methodology is the flexibility to add/remove building components and details and EE and EC profiles as much as required for the various ranges of projects. Moreover, the materials of the building utilities such as boilers, coolers, and security systems can be added according to the decision of designers and building in projects. Furthermore, whole phases of building maintenance during the building’s service life can be added, including the materials for devices and utilities (table 7.1). Table 7.1: Total EE, EC, OE, and Eco-point in scenario 1, The Arts Tower of Sheffield The Arts Energy Tower of (MJ) EC Sheffield, (Kg) Embodied Operational Scenario 1 (EE) (OE) Basement 2,358,341 43,168,557 75,565.44 43,244,122.44 42,058 floor/FL-BT Ground 6,525,120 116,524.80 6,641,644.80 393,510.3 4,141 floor/FL-GR Mezzanine 6,027,637.60 120,181.00 6,147,818.60 370,861.3 5,618 floor/FL-MZ Floors 273,348,263 967,195 274,315,458.10 14,299,211 935,838 Floor 19 15,112,604 129,173.00 15,241,777.00 837,030.8 11439 Roof 12,402,373 33,135.84 12,435,508.84 801,804 6,870 Total for 356,584,555 1,441,775.18 358,026,329.78 19,060,758 1,005,964 Building Figures 7.3 to 7.5 reveal comparisons of EE, OE, Total energy, EC, and Eco-point in the design sections of The Arts Tower of Sheffield in pie charts. Figure 7.3: Comparison of EE and OE in the design sections of The Arts Tower of Sheffield: Scenario1
Another advantage of this methodology is the flexibility to add/remove building components and details and EE and EC profiles as much as required for the various ranges of projects. Moreover, the materials of the building utilities such as boilers, coolers, and security systems can be added according to the decision of designers and building in projects. Furthermore, whole phases of building maintenance during the building’s service life can be added, including the materials for devices and utilities (table 7.1). Table 7.1: Total EE, EC, OE, and Eco-point in scenario 1, The Arts Tower of Sheffield The Arts Tower of Sheffield, Scenario 1 Energy (MJ) EC (Kg) Embodied (EE) Operational (OE) Basement floor/FL-BT 43,168,557 75,565.44 43,244,122.44 2,358,341 42,058 Ground floor/FL-GR 6,525,120 116,524.80 6,641,644.80 393,510.3 4,141 Mezzanine floor/FL-MZ 6,027,637.60 120,181.00 6,147,818.60 370,861.3 5,618 Floors 273,348,263 967,195 274,315,458.10 14,299,211 935,838 Floor 19 15,112,604 129,173.00 15,241,777.00 837,030.8 11439 Roof 12,402,373 33,135.84 12,435,508.84 801,804 6,870 Total for Building 356,584,555 1,441,775.18 358,026,329.78 19,060,758 1,005,964 Figures 7.3 to 7.5 reveal comparisons of EE, OE, Total energy, EC, and Eco-point in the design sections of The Arts Tower of Sheffield in pie charts. Figure 7.3: Comparison of EE and OE in the design sections of The Arts Tower of Sheffield: Scenario1
Thesis-Modified-14-09-13.docx