In 2014, the consistency of inclusion/exclusion criteria for IDB and for the reference statistics was unclear for almost all countries. Additional comments on major shortcomings are given, when the total score falls below 43. For more details see Annex 1, which contains the full table, for all items, all countries and both years 2015 and 2017. Table 3: Scores for item-groups by country and main reasons for low scores (2015) to 2016+ (up in current for (2015) of delivery (2015) shortcomings score exchange Quality Participation Data Prospects Major A. D. B. C. 2014) Total system (2015) Maximum 8 14 20 10 52 AT 8 13 19 7 47 CY 8 10 16 7 41 Biased sample (no private hospitals). No incidence rates. CZ 3 11 14 6 34 Only data on children 0-18a, only on admissions. No incidence rates. DK 8 13 19 8 48 EE 8 10 18 8 44 FI 6 8 18 8 40 Bias toward admissions. Delayed data delivery. GE 8 11 16 6 41 Small sample. Sampling within hospital. Just one federal state. GR 1 3 0 0 4 Dropped out during JAMIE-project. HU 8 2 0 6 16 Dropped out after end of JAMIE-project. IE 7 5 13 7 32 Just data on persons 15+. Small sample. IS 4 9 18 6 37 Data collection continued, but data exchange stopped after JAMIE-project. IT 7 9 18 9 43 LT 8 10 18 7 43 LU 8 13 20 9 50 LV 8 14 18 7 47 MT 8 9 20 9 46 NL 8 13 20 9 50 NO 8 11 18 8 45 PL 2 3 0 1 6 Dropped out after end of JAMIE-project. PT 8 10 16 8 42 Just home & leisure accidents. RO 6 7 0 3 16 Dropped out after end of JAMIE-project. SE 8 11 19 8 46 SI 8 13 19 9 49 SP 6 6 11 6 29 Dropped out after end of JAMIE-project. TR 8 12 19 9 48 UK 7 7 15 7 36 Not all MDS codes implemented. Delayed data delivery.
In 2014, the consistency of inclusion/exclusion criteria for IDB and for the reference statistics was unclear for almost all countries. Additional comments on major shortcomings are given, when the total score falls below 43. For more details see Annex 1, which contains the full table, for all items, all countries and both years 2015 and 2017. Table 3: Scores for item-groups by country and main reasons for low scores (2015) A. Participation in exchange B. Data delivery (up to 2014) C. Quality of current system (2015) D. Prospects for 2016+ (2015) Total score (2015) Major shortcomings Maximum 8 14 20 10 52 AT 8 13 19 7 47 CY 8 10 16 7 41 Biased sample (no private hospitals). No incidence rates. CZ 3 11 14 6 34 Only data on children 0-18a, only on admissions. No incidence rates. DK 8 13 19 8 48 EE 8 10 18 8 44 FI 6 8 18 8 40 Bias toward admissions. Delayed data delivery. GE 8 11 16 6 41 Small sample. Sampling within hospital. Just one federal state. GR 1 3 0 0 4 Dropped out during JAMIE-project. HU 8 2 0 6 16 Dropped out after end of JAMIE-project. IE 7 5 13 7 32 Just data on persons 15+. Small sample. IS 4 9 18 6 37 Data collection continued, but data exchange stopped after JAMIE-project. IT 7 9 18 9 43 LT 8 10 18 7 43 LU 8 13 20 9 50 LV 8 14 18 7 47 MT 8 9 20 9 46 NL 8 13 20 9 50 NO 8 11 18 8 45 PL 2 3 0 1 6 Dropped out after end of JAMIE-project. PT 8 10 16 8 42 Just home & leisure accidents. RO 6 7 0 3 16 Dropped out after end of JAMIE-project. SE 8 11 19 8 46 SI 8 13 19 9 49 SP 6 6 11 6 29 Dropped out after end of JAMIE-project. TR 8 12 19 9 48 UK 7 7 15 7 36 Not all MDS codes implemented. Delayed data delivery.
Sustainability%20Report.docx