body part) - Incidence rates 0 IR not available 0 only crude rate 1 standardized 2 or based on for age and catchment sex Geo-coverage 0 IR not available 0 Valid only for a 1 Valid at 2 region national level Sampling of 0 Just by 0 rational 1 Validated 2 hospitals availability of sampling but no sample hospitals validation check - Hospital 0 0 1 2 none or below Hardly above well above sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) FDS data 0 none 0 Sample below 1 Sample above 2 minimum minimum expected expected (<3000) (3000+) C. Total score (max. 20) 0 No system in place D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS 1 no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 It is likely, that data collection legislation will continue in provide the basis 2016? - Improvement 1 None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial 2 Legislation shall or maintenance improvements introduce MDS plan in place necessary data collection as for next years? a matter of routine - Legal basis for 1 No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 Legislation shall MDS data substantial very likely introduce MDS collection? discussion data collection as a matter of routine - Capacities in 1 Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay 1 Sufficient or 2 your the same will increase organization for injury data collection/ analysis? - Interest to 2 no 0 Yes, but 1 Yes, we 2 participate in depending on remain future EU injury availability of strongly information internal interested projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 6 Successful pilot FDS implementation in one hospital, which Summary discontinued with the end of the JAMIE project. Ongoing Implementation substantial discussion about legislation, which shall make the Assessment MDS data collection compulsory for all hospitals, has been initiated.
body part) - Incidence rates IR not available 0 only crude rate or based on catchment 1 standardized for age and sex 2 0 Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a region 1 Valid at national level 2 0 Sampling of hospitals Just by availability of hospitals 0 rational sampling but no validation check 1 Validated sample 2 0 - Hospital sample size none or below advised minimum 0 Hardly above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 1 well above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 2 0 FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 0 C. Total score (max. 20) 0 No system in place D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2016? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 1 It is likely, that legislation will provide the basis - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial improvements necessary 2 1 Legislation shall introduce MDS data collection as a matter of routine - Legal basis for MDS data collection? No plans 0 Ongoing substantial discussion 1 In place or very likely 2 1 Legislation shall introduce MDS data collection as a matter of routine - Capacities in your organization for injury data collection/ analysis? Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay the same 1 Sufficient or will increase 2 1 - Interest to participate in future EU injury information projects? no 0 Yes, but depending on availability of internal resources 1 Yes, we remain strongly interested 2 2 D. Total score (max. 10) 6 Summary Implementation Assessment Successful pilot FDS implementation in one hospital, which discontinued with the end of the JAMIE project. Ongoing substantial discussion about legislation, which shall make the MDS data collection compulsory for all hospitals, has been initiated.
Sustainability%20Report.docx