is some Cochrane alcohol adolescents. Participants alcohol use. Two RCTs were of 4)Not being were young (in two studies pooled(RR for mentoring programme. evidence Database of involved in age 12, and in two others compared to no intervention = of effect Systematic alcohol or 9-16). All students at 0.71 (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.90, P Reviews baseline were non-users of value = 0.005). A third RCT aggression or alcohol and drugs. found no significant differences. Alcohol accidents Three RCTs provided evidence prevention The studies assessed about mentoring and preventing Children and structured programmes and drug use, but could not be young people not informal mentors. pooled. One found significantly less use of “illegal“ drugs,” one did not, and one assessed only marijuana use and found no significant differences. One RCT measured “substance use” without separating alcohol and drugs, and found no difference for mentoring. The Community Guide Recommendations
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Alcohol prevention Children and young people alcohol 4)Not being involved in alcohol or aggression or accidents adolescents. Participants were young (in two studies age 12, and in two others 9-16). All students at baseline were non-users of alcohol and drugs. The studies assessed structured programmes and not informal mentors. alcohol use. Two RCTs were pooled(RR for mentoring compared to no intervention = 0.71 (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.90, P value = 0.005). A third RCT found no significant differences. Three RCTs provided evidence about mentoring and preventing drug use, but could not be pooled. One found significantly less use of “illegal“ drugs,” one did not, and one assessed only marijuana use and found no significant differences. One RCT measured “substance use” without separating alcohol and drugs, and found no difference for mentoring. of programme. is some evidence of effect The Community Guide Recommendations
Substance%20misuse%20alcohol%20Evidence%20Review%20Final.docx