PPC: 86 (6/2015) n/a 99.37 (average of State of Good Bridge Sufficiency Rating (0-100)3 average <.003% 99.64) Repair (6/2015) (9/2012) Percentage Strategic Goal Performance Measure Change Area 22 44 Average bike trips 100% Quality of Life (8/2011) (6/2015) 6 14 Average daily pedestrian trips 133.3% Quality of Life (8/2011) (6/2015) 3 Pavement condition and bridge sufficiency baseline measures were taken after the new facility was completed. Therefore, the in this case refers to initial data after construction. “pre-project” 4 Pavement Structural Condition (PSC), Pavement Rutting Condition (PRC), and Pavement Profile Condition (PPC) Other Considerations: Performance results showed some fluctuation across quarters. In a few these were due to seasonal factors (e.g. bike/pedestrian trips were lower in the winter), while in others (e.g. delay) they were due to temporary construction activities. In yet other cases (e.g. traffic volumes), the fluctuations were the results of changes in methodologies or technologies used for data collection. This project demonstrates challenges associated with measuring performance of a new facility. For most performance metrics, the baseline figures represented conditions during an early stage of the project when only two lanes out of the eventual six were available. Reported changes in traffic, crashes, and pavement and bridge conditions do not address the overall benefits of the project from a regional perspective but represent changes on the road facility itself. Moreover, because the project involved construction of just one segment of what will eventually be a new multimodal corridor providing a critical high-speed, link to I-90, significantly greater benefits are likely to be realized once the full corridor is complete. Additional benefits not captured by the data reported as part of the grant agreement requirements include the following: Table 16. Qualitative Project Benefits: I-395 North Spokane Corridor Francis Ave. to Farwell Rd. – Southbound Performance Measure Strategic Goal Area Fuel savings Economic Competitiveness, Quality of Life, Environmental Sustainability Travel time savings Economic Competitiveness, Quality of Life Jobs created Economic Competitiveness, Quality of Life Traffic moved from urban Economic Competitiveness, Quality of Life, Environmental Sustainability arterials to the new highway
PPC: 86 (6/2015) Bridge Sufficiency Rating (0-100)3 n/a (average of 99.64) (9/2012) 99.37 average (6/2015) <.003% State of Good Repair Performance Measure Percentage Change Strategic Goal Area Average bike trips 22 (8/2011) 44 (6/2015) 100% Quality of Life Average daily pedestrian trips 6 (8/2011) 14 (6/2015) 133.3% Quality of Life 3 Pavement condition and bridge sufficiency baseline measures were taken after the new facility was completed. Therefore, the “pre-project” in this case refers to initial data after construction. 4 Pavement Structural Condition (PSC), Pavement Rutting Condition (PRC), and Pavement Profile Condition (PPC) Other Considerations: Performance results showed some fluctuation across quarters. In a few these were due to seasonal factors (e.g. bike/pedestrian trips were lower in the winter), while in others (e.g. delay) they were due to temporary construction activities. In yet other cases (e.g. traffic volumes), the fluctuations were the results of changes in methodologies or technologies used for data collection. This project demonstrates challenges associated with measuring performance of a new facility. For most performance metrics, the baseline figures represented conditions during an early stage of the project when only two lanes out of the eventual six were available. Reported changes in traffic, crashes, and pavement and bridge conditions do not address the overall benefits of the project from a regional perspective but represent changes on the road facility itself. Moreover, because the project involved construction of just one segment of what will eventually be a new multimodal corridor providing a critical high-speed, link to I-90, significantly greater benefits are likely to be realized once the full corridor is complete. Additional benefits not captured by the data reported as part of the grant agreement requirements include the following: Table 16. Qualitative Project Benefits: I-395 North Spokane Corridor – Francis Ave. to Farwell Rd. Southbound Performance Measure Strategic Goal Area Fuel savings Economic Competitiveness, Quality of Life, Environmental Sustainability Travel time savings Economic Competitiveness, Quality of Life Jobs created Economic Competitiveness, Quality of Life Traffic moved from urban arterials to the new highway Economic Competitiveness, Quality of Life, Environmental Sustainability
TIGER%20Performance%20Measurement%20Biennial%20Report%202016%20Final.docx