MALE FEMALE BME WHITE ETHNICITY DISABLED NOT NOT KNOWN DISABLED* Heads % % Heads % Heads % Heads % Heads % Heads % 2011 Applied 436 164 38% 271 62% 97 22% 331 76% 8 1.8% 21 4.8% 415 95% Shortlisted 195 59 30% 136 70% 24 12% 167 86% 4 2.1% 15 7.7% 180 92% Appointed 122 38 31% 84 69% 17 14% 101 83% 4 3.3% 8 6.6% 114 93% 2010 Applied 462 174 38% 288 62% 89 19% 352 76% 21 4.5% 26 5.6% 436 94% Shortlisted 180 62 34% 118 66% 22 12% 149 83% 9 5.0% 7 3.9% 173 96% Appointed 83 24 29% 59 71% 7 8.0% 72 87% 4 4.8% 5 6.0% 78 94% 2009 Applied 718 265 37% 453 63% 88 12% 573 80% 57 7.9% 16 2.2% 702 98% Shortlisted 262 88 34% 174 66% 16 6.1% 219 84% 27 10% 5 1.9% 257 98% Appointed 113 38 34% 75 66% 9 8.0% 95 84% 9 8.0% 2 1.8% 111 98% * Figures for Disabled” include applicants who did not provide data; from 2011 data relates to the period August to July. “Not Table 13 shows an increase in temporary recruitment in 2011. This was to provide a wider pool of staff to provide additional interim ‘bank’ support during the period of organisational restructuring. The number of TSU staff in assignment, however, reduced in 2011 (see table 1). The proportion of BME applicants and appointments has again increased significantly in 2011. The higher success rate of applicants declaring as disabled has also been maintained. 14 - INTERNAL RECRUITMENT ONLY BY EQUALITY GROUP
MALE FEMALE BME WHITE ETHNICITY NOT KNOWN DISABLED NOT DISABLED* Heads % % Heads % Heads % Heads % Heads % Heads % 2011 Applied Shortlisted Appointed 436 195 122 164 59 38 38% 30% 31% 271 136 84 62% 70% 69% 97 24 17 22% 12% 14% 331 167 101 76% 86% 83% 8 4 4 1.8% 2.1% 3.3% 21 15 8 4.8% 7.7% 6.6% 415 180 114 95% 92% 93% 2010 Applied Shortlisted Appointed 462 180 83 174 62 24 38% 34% 29% 288 118 59 62% 66% 71% 89 22 7 19% 12% 8.0% 352 149 72 76% 83% 87% 21 9 4 4.5% 5.0% 4.8% 26 7 5 5.6% 3.9% 6.0% 436 173 78 94% 96% 94% 2009 Applied Shortlisted Appointed 718 262 113 265 88 38 37% 34% 34% 453 174 75 63% 66% 66% 88 16 9 12% 6.1% 8.0% 573 219 95 80% 84% 84% 57 27 9 7.9% 10% 8.0% 16 5 2 2.2% 1.9% 1.8% 702 257 111 98% 98% 98% * Figures for “Not Disabled” include applicants who did not provide data; from 2011 data relates to the period August to July. Table 13 shows an increase in temporary recruitment in 2011. This was to provide a wider pool of ‘bank’ staff to provide additional interim support during the period of organisational restructuring. The number of TSU staff in assignment, however, reduced in 2011 (see table 1). The proportion of BME applicants and appointments has again increased significantly in 2011. The higher success rate of applicants declaring as disabled has also been maintained. 14 - INTERNAL RECRUITMENT ONLY BY EQUALITY GROUP
Staffing-Compendium-2011.docx