Assessment the EU IDB data exchange is very likely. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data Amsterdam, October Informed, no objection, Huib Valkenberg administrator 2017 no explicit consent BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: NORWAY October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments 2 - Membership as not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 observer or full of member (2015) 2 - Participation 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2 level in past eight meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended 2 - Government No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 endorsement support of term perspective for endorsement 2 - Responsive to only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to Score Comments 2 - Data delivered none 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 in past five for just one year for two or years more years 2016) 1 - MDS data 2016 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 complete and 2 Delayed delivered expected in time 2 - Accuracy of 0 1 2 more than 40% between 10% less than 10% 2015 coding (most unknown and 40% unknown current unknown delivery) 2 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper 1 Reference 2 2015
Assessment the EU IDB data exchange is very likely. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data administrator Amsterdam, October 2017 Huib Valkenberg Informed, no objection, no explicit consent BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: NORWAY October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the eight meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 2 - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 2 - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 2 A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to Score Comments - Data delivered in past five years none 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 2 - MDS data 2016 delivered Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 complete and in time 2 1 Delayed - Accuracy of coding (most current delivery) more than 40% unknown 0 between 10% and 40% unknown 1 less than 10% unknown 2 2 2015 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper 1 Reference 2 2 2015 2016)
Sustainability%20Report.docx