The execution of the masterplan is subject to several risks. They have been mentioned in the text above but are summarised here together with possible mitigations. Risk Consequence Mitigation The TAP Phase One is Delay to re-publication of Effective working in May not approved according to TAP TSI Regulation, and June 2012 by all the Chapter 7 timetable uncertainty for RU and parties to ensure approval IMs as to the method for is to the timetable meeting their obligations and therefore no funds at all in 2013 for any TAP TSI Phase Two activity DG MOVE or ERA Extended negotiation Effective working in May proposes material between DG MOVE, ERA and June 2012 by all changes to the TAP and the stakeholders parties to ensure approval Phase One (for example leading to uncertainty for is to the timetable as regards the RU and IMs as to the architecture or method for meeting their governance) and the obligations and therefore regulatory services no funds at all in 2013 for proposed in it any TAP TSI Phase Two activity RUs in a bad financial Incomplete roll-out of TAP DG MOVE and relevant state will not meet TSI masterplan Member State discuss masterplan timetable funding options for affected RUs RUs not involved in TAP Incomplete roll-out of TAP Member States actively TSI Phase One project TSI masterplan ensure all implicated RUs will not meet masterplan prepare and execute their timetable implementation plan project RUs operating PSO Incomplete roll-out of TAP Member States actively contracts will not meet TSI masterplan ensure all public masterplan timetable authorities holding or entering into rail PSO contracts are aware of the need for their PSO RUs to prepare and execute an implementation plan project RUs not involved in Incomplete roll-out of TAP Member States actively international business will TSI masterplan ensure all implicated RUs not meet masterplan plan at least to make their timetable timetable data available as per the Regulation RUs and IMs have no Incomplete roll-out of TAP Member States where funds to carry out TSI masterplan necessary fund RUs to implementation plan prepare and execute their projects in second half of implementation plan 2012 project RUs cannot fund Phase Phase Two transition goodwill from RUs and Two transition project to starts only when IMs to self-fund work in start in 2012 stakeholder funds 2012 in anticipation of collected in mid 2013 eventual project payment leading to six to nine months delay to masterplan
The execution of the masterplan is subject to several risks. They have been mentioned in the text above but are summarised here together with possible mitigations. Risk Consequence Mitigation The TAP Phase One is not approved according to the Chapter 7 timetable Delay to re-publication of TAP TSI Regulation, uncertainty for RU and IMs as to the method for meeting their obligations and therefore no funds at all in 2013 for any TAP TSI Phase Two activity Effective working in May and June 2012 by all parties to ensure approval is to the timetable DG MOVE or ERA proposes material changes to the TAP Phase One (for example as regards the architecture or governance) and the regulatory services proposed in it Extended negotiation between DG MOVE, ERA and the stakeholders leading to uncertainty for RU and IMs as to the method for meeting their obligations and therefore no funds at all in 2013 for any TAP TSI Phase Two activity Effective working in May and June 2012 by all parties to ensure approval is to the timetable RUs in a bad financial state will not meet masterplan timetable Incomplete roll-out of TAP TSI masterplan DG MOVE and relevant Member State discuss funding options for affected RUs RUs not involved in TAP TSI Phase One project will not meet masterplan timetable Incomplete roll-out of TAP TSI masterplan Member States actively ensure all implicated RUs prepare and execute their implementation plan project RUs operating PSO contracts will not meet masterplan timetable Incomplete roll-out of TAP TSI masterplan Member States actively ensure all public authorities holding or entering into rail PSO contracts are aware of the need for their PSO RUs to prepare and execute an implementation plan project RUs not involved in international business will not meet masterplan timetable Incomplete roll-out of TAP TSI masterplan Member States actively ensure all implicated RUs plan at least to make their timetable data available as per the Regulation RUs and IMs have no funds to carry out implementation plan projects in second half of 2012 Incomplete roll-out of TAP TSI masterplan Member States where necessary fund RUs to prepare and execute their implementation plan project RUs cannot fund Phase Two transition project to start in 2012 Phase Two transition starts only when stakeholder funds collected in mid 2013 leading to six to nine months delay to masterplan goodwill from RUs and IMs to self-fund work in 2012 in anticipation of eventual project payment
tap_masterplan_v1-1_tracked.docx