information internal interested exchange projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 8 Excellent & sustainable system. Desired improvements are the Summary correction of the HD bias and one additional FDS reference Implementation hospital. Between 2015-2017, no substantial changes have Assessment taken place. Data delivery for 2016 is not completed yet. Future in the EU IDB exchange is not secured. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data Informed, no objection, Helsinki, October 2017 Anne Lounamaa administrator no explicit consent BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: GERMANY/ BRANDENBURG October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments 2 - Membership as not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 observer or full of member (2015) 2 - Participation 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2 level in past eight meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended 2 - Government No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 At state level, but endorsement support of term not at federal perspective for endorsement level participation 2 - Responsive to only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to Score Comments 2 - Data delivered none 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 in past five for just one year for two or years more years
information projects? internal resources interested exchange D. Total score (max. 10) 8 Summary Implementation Assessment Excellent & sustainable system. Desired improvements are the correction of the HD bias and one additional FDS reference hospital. Between 2015-2017, no substantial changes have taken place. Data delivery for 2016 is not completed yet. Future in the EU IDB exchange is not secured. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data administrator Helsinki, October 2017 Anne Lounamaa Informed, no objection, no explicit consent BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: GERMANY/ BRANDENBURG October 2017 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the eight meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 2 - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 2 At state level, but not at federal level - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 2 A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to Score Comments - Data delivered in past five years none 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 2 participation
Sustainability%20Report.docx