B. Total score (max. 14) 7 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection 2 no data & no plan 0 no data but 1 Collected & 2 ongoing to (re)start restart planned / delivery data delivery certain uncertain - Age groups 2 0 1 2 not covering the All ages in most all ages in all full age-span of the hospitals hospitals - Injury 2 less than 0 At least home, 1 all injuries 2 categories leisure & school - Outpatients 2 0 1 2 none or strongly biased toward All HDs + all biased toward HD but EDs HD corrected for IR 0 - Completeness more than 1 code 0 just one missing 1 all codes 2 Currently not of coding missing implemented possible to (mechanism, identify fall and injury type, road location body part) injuries due to limitations of English injury surveillance dataset being used at present - Incidence rates 2 0 1 2 IR not available only crude rate standardized or based on for age and catchment sex 1 Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a 1 Valid at 2 Only England at region national level present is represented. Sampling of 2 Just by 0 rational 1 Validated 2 Not needed due hospitals availability of sampling but no sample to large sample hospitals validation check - Hospital 2 none or below 0 Hardly above 1 well above 2 sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) FDS data 0 none 0 Sample below 1 Sample above 2 No FDS minimum minimum reference expected expected hospital yet (<3000) (3000+) C. Total score (max. 20) 15 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS 2 no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 data collection continue in 2016? - Improvement 1 None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial 2 Inclusion of or maintenance improvements Wales & plan in place necessary Scotland. Full for next years? implementation of MDS. Search for FDS hospital. - Legal basis for 1 0 1 2 No plans Ongoing In place or Extraction from
B. Total score (max. 14) 7 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection ongoing no data & no plan to (re)start 0 no data but restart planned / data delivery uncertain 1 Collected & delivery certain 2 2 - Age groups not covering the full age-span 0 All ages in most of the hospitals 1 all ages in all hospitals 2 2 - Injury categories less than 0 At least home, leisure & school 1 all injuries 2 2 - Outpatients none or strongly biased toward HD 0 biased toward HD but corrected for IR 1 All HDs + all EDs 2 2 - Completeness of coding (mechanism, injury type, body part) more than 1 code missing 0 just one missing 1 all codes implemented 2 0 Currently not possible to identify fall and road location injuries due to limitations of English injury surveillance dataset being used at present - Incidence rates IR not available 0 only crude rate or based on catchment 1 standardized for age and sex 2 2 Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a region 1 Valid at national level 2 1 Only England at present is represented. Sampling of hospitals Just by availability of hospitals 0 rational sampling but no validation check 1 Validated sample 2 2 Not needed due to large sample - Hospital sample size none or below advised minimum 0 Hardly above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 1 well above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 2 2 FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 0 No FDS reference hospital yet C. Total score (max. 20) 15 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2016? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 2 - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial improvements necessary 2 1 Inclusion of Wales & Scotland. Full implementation of MDS. Search for FDS hospital. - Legal basis for No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 1 Extraction from
Sustainability%20Report.docx