Rating scale Satisfactory Less than satisfactory 6 Very high quality 3 Less than adequate quality 5 Good quality 2 Poor quality 4 Adequate quality 1 Very poor quality Body of report (maximum 20 pages excluding annexes) Introduction Initiative Background <Provide information about the objectives, design and implementation history of the initiative. Include relevant information on the country context of the activity and how the initiative fits into the country and/or sector strategy.> Evaluation Purpose and Questions <Description of the evaluation objective(s) and questions, as defined in the Terms of Reference and Evaluation Plan.> Evaluation Scope and Methods <Description of the: methods of the evaluation including sources of evidence and of analysis used to answer the evaluation questions duration of the evaluation assumptions made by the evaluation team limitations of the method and sources of evidence for those DFAT criteria not covered in the evaluation, the evaluation manager should provide an explanation of how and when these criteria have been or will be assessed> Evaluation Findings <The main body of the report should directly answer the evaluation questions, as defined in the Terms of Reference and Evaluation Plan. As the report structure should be determined by the evaluation questions, noting that: Quantitative and qualitative evidence to support findings and recommendations needs to be presented as part of the report referring to annexes or other documents is not sufficient. – Where possible, data should be disaggregated by gender. Regardless of the structure, findings must specifically address those evaluation criteria (listed below) which were covered in the evaluation. The Evaluation Manager should delete any criteria which were not included in the evaluation.
Rating scale Satisfactory Less than satisfactory 6 Very high quality 3 Less than adequate quality 5 Good quality 2 Poor quality 4 Adequate quality 1 Very poor quality Body of report (maximum 20 pages excluding annexes) Introduction Initiative Background <Provide information about the objectives, design and implementation history of the initiative. Include relevant information on the country context of the activity and how the initiative fits into the country and/or sector strategy.> Evaluation Purpose and Questions <Description of the evaluation objective(s) and questions, as defined in the Terms of Reference and Evaluation Plan.> Evaluation Scope and Methods <Description of the: methods of the evaluation including sources of evidence and of analysis used to answer the evaluation questions duration of the evaluation assumptions made by the evaluation team limitations of the method and sources of evidence for those DFAT criteria not covered in the evaluation, the evaluation manager should provide an explanation of how and when these criteria have been or will be assessed> Evaluation Findings <The main body of the report should directly answer the evaluation questions, as defined in the Terms of Reference and Evaluation Plan. As the report structure should be determined by the evaluation questions, noting that: Quantitative and qualitative evidence to support findings and recommendations needs to be presented as part of the report – referring to annexes or other documents is not sufficient. Where possible, data should be disaggregated by gender. Regardless of the structure, findings must specifically address those evaluation criteria (listed below) which were covered in the evaluation. The Evaluation Manager should delete any criteria which were not included in the evaluation.
sri-lanka-support-education-sector-conflict-affected-areas-evaluation.docx