know blue cards screening. Notification for families e.g. at the entrance of the service is a sign notifying of a student and the AO visiting. Parent handbook, enrolment pack. Each room send out daily emails. Information about events. Facebook page, emails and verbal communications. The regulatory authority noted that the evidence was provided to provider’s demonstrate that an effective enrolment and orientation process is in place that supports families, and current information about the service is provided to families in an accessible format. However, the regulatory authority noted insufficient evidence was provided in support of statements that indicated families are offered a range of opportunities to be actively involved in the service and significantly contribute to service decisions. The regulatory authority states in its first tier review considerations that while the evidence considered as part of the first tier review reflects aspects of both meeting and exceeding practice, overall, the evidence of practice for Standard 6.1 reflects ‘Meeting NQS’. ACECQA advises the panel that the decision outcome letter lists standard 6.1 under both and but the deliberation document ‘Meeting NQS’ ‘Exceeding NQS’ has standard 6.1 listed as ‘Meeting NQS’. view Applicant’s In the cover letter for its application for second tier review the provider noted the regulatory authority mentioned only six of 33 points of evidence it submitted, and feels that this means 27 points were not taken into account. The provider states that evidence was available to show families are offered a range of opportunities to be actively involved in the service and significantly contribute to service decisions. The provider identifies that there are many examples of this in the authorised comments and the feedback the officer’s provider has given. The provider further states that, relationships with ‘our families and input from families are definite strengths of ours, and our families are constantly involved, consulted and listened to’. The provider states there is significant evidence provided above to ‘we believe support how we exceed the National Quality Standard in standard 6.1 in relation to how we offer families a range of opportunities to be actively involved in the service, and significantly contribute to service decisions. There is abundant further evidence available in our response to draft and first tier review about how we exceed the rest of the elements in standard 6.1’. The provider states the service does not just enrol a child, it enrols a family and the director and educators show understanding and interest in each child and their family. Educators encourage children to share things with friends that
know blue cards screening. Notification for families e.g. at the entrance of the service is a sign notifying of a student and the AO visiting. Parent handbook, enrolment pack. Each room send out daily emails. Information about events. Facebook page, emails and verbal communications. The regulatory authority noted that the provider’s evidence was provided to demonstrate that an effective enrolment and orientation process is in place that supports families, and current information about the service is provided to families in an accessible format. However, the regulatory authority noted insufficient evidence was provided in support of statements that indicated families are offered a range of opportunities to be actively involved in the service and significantly contribute to service decisions. The regulatory authority states in its first tier review considerations that while the evidence considered as part of the first tier review reflects aspects of both meeting and exceeding practice, overall, the evidence of practice for Standard 6.1 reflects ‘Meeting NQS’. ACECQA advises the panel that the decision outcome letter lists standard 6.1 under both ‘Meeting NQS’ and ‘Exceeding NQS’ but the deliberation document has standard 6.1 listed as ‘Meeting NQS’. Applicant’s view In the cover letter for its application for second tier review the provider noted the regulatory authority mentioned only six of 33 points of evidence it submitted, and feels that this means 27 points were not taken into account. The provider states that evidence was available to show families are offered a range of opportunities to be actively involved in the service and significantly contribute to service decisions. The provider identifies that there are many examples of this in the authorised officer’s comments and the feedback the provider has given. The provider further states that, ‘our relationships with families and input from families are definite strengths of ours, and our families are constantly involved, consulted and listened to’. The provider states ‘we believe there is significant evidence provided above to support how we exceed the National Quality Standard in standard 6.1 in relation to how we offer families a range of opportunities to be actively involved in the service, and significantly contribute to service decisions. There is abundant further evidence available in our response to draft and first tier review about how we exceed the rest of the elements in standard 6.1’. The provider states the service does not just enrol a child, it enrols a family and the director and educators show understanding and interest in each child and their family. Educators encourage children to share things with friends that
STR0018_Decision_notice_de-identified.docx