Subgroup Achievement Indicators Review Subgroup Data via the NCLB drop-down under the Accountability tab: % of this group # of students How severe is this group’s failure in comparison SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018 SY 2018-2019 SY 2019-2020 ELA passing passing in to the school’s rate? In what ways are the Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Student Groups - this group learning needs of this group unique? Example: LEP 35% 52 HIGH - No formal schooling; from 40% passing 45% passing 50% passing 55% passing 60% passing culture. All Students: 66.2% 401 High: Below state average 70% 76% 83% 88% 92% ECA 73.8% 90 77% 81% 85% 89% 94% African American 65.8% 387 70% 76% 83% 88% 92% 73.5% 86 77% 81% 85% 89% 94% Islander NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hispanic 72.7% 8 76% 80% 84% 88% 92% NA NA White NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Students with 35.7% 5 High: Most significant achievement gap. 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% Disabilities NA NA Need differentiated instruction based on diverse needs LEP NA NA NA: Scores suppressed NA NA NA NA NA Free/Reduced Lunch 65.7% 326 High: HS achievement gap of 14.4% but 70% 76% 83% 88% 92% 74.3% 72 outperformed other FRL students statewide 77% 81% 85% 89% 94% 96.8% 92 HS required - : Vast majority are currently passing but we 97% 97.5% 98% 98+% 98+% % of of ECA who pass by expect ALL students to succeed 12th grade % of this group # of students SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018 SY 2018-2019 SY 2019-2020 How severe is this group’s failure in comparison Math passing passing in Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal to the school’s rate? In what ways are the Student Groups - this group learning needs of this group unique? Example: LEP 35% 52 HIGH - No formal schooling; from 40% passing 45% passing 50% passing 55% passing 60% passing 64.2% culture.
Subgroup Achievement Indicators Review Subgroup Data via the NCLB drop-down under the Accountability tab: Student Groups - ELA % of this group passing # of students passing in this group How severe is this group’s failure in comparison to the school’s rate? In what ways are the learning needs of this group unique? SY 2015-2016 Goal SY 2016-2017 Goal SY 2017-2018 Goal SY 2018-2019 Goal SY 2019-2020 Goal Example: LEP 35% 52 HIGH - No formal schooling; from culture. 40% passing 45% passing 50% passing 55% passing 60% passing All Students: ECA 66.2% 73.8% 401 90 High: Below state average 70% 77% 76% 81% 83% 85% 88% 89% 92% 94% African American 65.8% 73.5% 387 86 70% 77% 76% 81% 83% 85% 88% 89% 92% 94% Islander NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hispanic 72.7% NA 8 NA 76% 80% 84% 88% 92% White NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Students with Disabilities 35.7% NA 5 NA High: Most significant achievement gap. Need differentiated instruction based on diverse needs 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% LEP NA NA NA: Scores suppressed NA NA NA NA NA Free/Reduced Lunch 65.7% 74.3% 326 72 High: HS achievement gap of 14.4% but outperformed other FRL students statewide 70% 77% 76% 81% 83% 85% 88% 89% 92% 94% HS required - % of of ECA who pass by 12th grade 96.8% 92 : Vast majority are currently passing but we expect ALL students to succeed 97% 97.5% 98% 98+% 98+% Student Groups - Math % of this group passing # of students passing in this group How severe is this group’s failure in comparison to the school’s rate? In what ways are the learning needs of this group unique? SY 2015-2016 Goal SY 2016-2017 Goal SY 2017-2018 Goal SY 2018-2019 Goal SY 2019-2020 Goal Example: LEP 35% 64.2% 52 HIGH - No formal schooling; from culture. 40% passing 45% passing 50% passing 55% passing 60% passing
thea-bowman-leadership-academy-sig-application-ac.docx