sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) 0 FDS data none 0 Sample below 1 Sample above 2 minimum minimum expected expected (<3000) (3000+) C. Total score (max. 20) 0 There is no system in place D. Prospects for 2018+ Score Comments 0 - Will the MDS no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 data collection continue in 2018? 0 - Improvement None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no 2 or maintenance substantial plan in place improvements for next years? necessary 0 - Legal basis for No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 MDS data substantial very likely collection? discussion 0 - Capacities in Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay 1 Sufficient or 2 your the same will increase organization for injury data collection/ analysis? 1 - Interest to no 0 Yes, but 1 Yes, we 2 participate in depending on remain future EU injury availability of strongly information internal interested projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 1 Successful pilot in 4 hospitals in one region in 2012/2013 did not Summary lead to a permanent implementation. During 2015-2017, the pilot partner remains interested, but neither national funding nor Implementation governmental support could be achieved. Continuing Assessment in the EU IDB data exchange is likely, but data delivery is unlikely in the near future. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data Informed, no objection, Cluj-Napoca Diana Dulf administrator no explicit consent BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes
sample size advised minimum advised minimum (Table 4.1) advised minimum (Table 4.1) FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 0 C. Total score (max. 20) 0 There is no system in place D. Prospects for 2018+ Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2018? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 0 - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 Yes or no substantial improvements necessary 2 0 - Legal basis for MDS data collection? No plans 0 Ongoing substantial discussion 1 In place or very likely 2 0 - Capacities in your organization for injury data collection/ analysis? Will be reduced 0 Scarce but stay the same 1 Sufficient or will increase 2 0 - Interest to participate in future EU injury information projects? no 0 Yes, but depending on availability of internal resources 1 Yes, we remain strongly interested 2 1 D. Total score (max. 10) 1 Summary Implementation Assessment Successful pilot in 4 hospitals in one region in 2012/2013 did not lead to a permanent implementation. During 2015-2017, the pilot partner remains interested, but neither national funding nor governmental support could be achieved. Continuing in the EU IDB data exchange is likely, but data delivery is unlikely in the near future. Approval Function Place, date Name OK National IDB data administrator Cluj-Napoca Diana Dulf Informed, no objection, no explicit consent BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, October 2017 Rupert Kisser yes
Sustainability%20Report.docx