To a certain extent, their disruptive activities had a deleterious effect, but our party and government have unswervingly adhered to the revolutionary line in foreign affairs formulated by Chairman Mao. The of four' in no way represent the Chinese people. They are ‘gang traitors disowned by the Chinese people." (op.cit., p.24). It is as simple as that! Everyone who should express doubts as to the correctness of the strategic concept of today's Chinese leaders supports the "gang of four". There then follows a whole passage devoted to the "main force against imperialism, colonialism and hegemonism": "The countries and people of the world constitute the main force in the world-wide struggle against the hegemonism of the two superpowers and against imperialism and colonialism. (...). What are the grounds for our saying this? Since the end of World War Il, the revolutionary people of Asia, Africa, Latin America and other regions, standing in the forefront of the anti-imperialist and struggle ( ... )" (‘Renmin Ribao', "Chairman Mao's theory ... ", p. 39). But take note! the end of World War II a whole line of countries and peoples in Europe, Asia and America have overthrown imperialist rule, done away with the capitalist social order and introduced socialism with the support of the Soviet Union, at that time the basis of world revolution. This socialist camp, along with the proletariat struggling in the capitalist countries, formed the principal force and the main support of national liberation in the colonies and semi-colonies which one by one gained their national independence. But they were by no means entirely independent. In Weg' No 16 and 17 ‘Revolutionarer (Revolutionary Way, theoretical organ of the KABD) we have shown in an exact analysis that in the meantime these countries have been forced into a neo-colonial position, becoming economically and to an extent politically dependent on the monopolies of the imperialist countries (not only of the two superpowers). At the end of RW 17 we have shown how these countries can liberate themselves from this imperialist strangle-hold: "We have already pointed out in Revolutionary Way No 16 that in order to attain genuine political independence, developing countries
To a certain extent, their disruptive activities had a deleterious effect, but our party and government have unswervingly adhered to the revolutionary line in foreign affairs formulated by Chairman Mao. The ‘gang of four' in no way represent the Chinese people. They are traitors disowned by the Chinese people." (op.cit., p.24). It is as simple as that! Everyone who should express doubts as to the correctness of the strategic concept of today's Chinese leaders supports the "gang of four". There then follows a whole passage devoted to the "main force against imperialism, colonialism and hegemonism": "The countries and people of the world constitute the main force in the world-wide struggle against the hegemonism of the two superpowers and against imperialism and colonialism. (...). What are the grounds for our saying this? Since the end of World War Il, the revolutionary people of Asia, Africa, Latin America and other regions, standing in the forefront of the anti-imperialist and struggle ( ... )" (‘Renmin Ribao', "Chairman Mao's theory ... ", p. 39). But take note! the end of World War II a whole line of countries and peoples in Europe, Asia and America have overthrown imperialist rule, done away with the capitalist social order and introduced socialism with the support of the Soviet Union, at that time the basis of world revolution. This socialist camp, along with the proletariat struggling in the capitalist countries, formed the principal force and the main support of national liberation in the colonies and semi-colonies which one by one gained their national independence. But they were by no means entirely independent. In ‘Revolutionarer Weg' No 16 and 17 (Revolutionary Way, theoretical organ of the KABD) we have shown in an exact analysis that in the meantime these countries have been forced into a neo-colonial position, becoming economically and to an extent politically dependent on the monopolies of the imperialist countries (not only of the two superpowers). At the end of RW 17 we have shown how these countries can liberate themselves from this imperialist strangle-hold: "We have already pointed out in Revolutionary Way No 16 that in order to attain genuine political independence, developing countries
ThreeWorldsTheorySmacksOfRight-WingOpportunism-KABD-1980.docx