Teacher Evaluation Model Comparison Table Domain or The Framework for Teaching by CEL 5D+ Teacher Evaluation Rubric 2.0 Marzano Art and Science of Teaching Dimension Charlotte Danielson (UW’s Dimensions of Learning) Framework 22 Components in 4 Domains: 31 indicators each addressing one best 60 elements/strategies over 4 Number of – practice. One best practice per indicator domains. 41 of the 60 comprise Domain Components or Indicators makes the rubric psychometrically sound. 1: Classroom Strategies & Behaviors 1: Planning and Preparation for Teacher (from the Art & Science of Teaching, these 2: The Classroom Environment Evaluation are the instructional categories that 3: Instruction happen in the classroom). 4: Professional Responsibilities 10 observable Components in Domains 2 and 3 Number of Over 100 and counting. Districts and Latest information was over 600 school districts in Whole-state adoptions of the Danielson states continue to contact the Center for districts. which this Framework include: Educational Leadership and adopt the framework is Arkansas 5D+ rubric. being used Delaware for teacher Idaho evaluation Illinois nationwide Pennsylvania Wisconsin Louisiana South Dakota Kentucky The Danielson Framework is among the approved instruments in states such as: Florida Hawaii New Jersey New York Oklahoma
Teacher Evaluation Model Comparison Table Domain or Dimension The Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson CEL 5D+ Teacher Evaluation Rubric 2.0 (UW’s Dimensions of Learning) Marzano Art and Science of Teaching Framework Number of Components or Indicators for Teacher Evaluation 22 Components in 4 Domains: 1: Planning and Preparation 2: The Classroom Environment 3: Instruction 4: Professional Responsibilities 10 observable Components in Domains 2 and 3 31 indicators – each addressing one best practice. One best practice per indicator makes the rubric psychometrically sound. 60 elements/strategies over 4 domains. 41 of the 60 comprise Domain 1: Classroom Strategies & Behaviors (from the Art & Science of Teaching, these are the instructional categories that happen in the classroom). Number of districts in which this framework is being used for teacher evaluation nationwide Whole-state adoptions of the Danielson Framework include: Arkansas Delaware Idaho Illinois Pennsylvania Wisconsin Louisiana South Dakota Kentucky The Danielson Framework is among the approved instruments in states such as: Florida Hawaii New Jersey New York Oklahoma Over 100 and counting. Districts and states continue to contact the Center for Educational Leadership and adopt the 5D+ rubric. Latest information was over 600 school districts.
teacher_eval_model_comparison_chart.docx