Time Scale for Time scale to spin up the activity or product Project Cost and What’s the cost to SCCOOS of the activity? Funding Is targeted funding available for this specific activity? Potential to leverage existing funds or attract future funds Has the PI been able to attract funding based on SCCOOS funding or a SCCOOS letter of support and if so – can they keep going without base SCCOOS funding? 2Within the and categories, sequence of criteria is based on a logical progression from broad to “primary” “other” specific considerations, and is not intended to imply any prioritization or relative weighting of considerations Appendix 2 SCCOOS Active Signatory Members (as of April 2014) Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Science and Technology Directorate Phil Bailey Representatives: Ben Holt, Paul DiGiacamo Dean of the College of Science and University of California, Irvine Mathematics William H. Parker Representative: Mark Moline Vice Chancellor for Research University of California, Santa Barbara Representatives: Carl Friehe, George Hunt, Gaines Stanley Brett Sanders Director, Marine Science Institute Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Representatives: Tommy Dickey, Libe University of California, San Diego Washburn John Orcutt University of Southern California Deputy Director Tony Michaels Representative: John Orcutt, Deputy Director, Wrigley Institute for Director Environmental Studies CICESE Representative: Burt Javier Mendieta University of California, Los Angeles Director General Keith Stolzenbach Representive: Francisco Ocampo Director, Coastal Center, Institute of the UABC Environment Guadalupe Garcia Representatives: Keith Stolzenbach, James Vicerector C. McWilliams Representative: Reginaldo Durazo Jet Propulsion Laboratory/National California State University, Los Angeles Aeronautics & Space Administration Carlos Robles Diane Evans Program Director, CEA-CREST
Time Scale for Project Time scale to spin up the activity or product Cost and Funding What’s the cost to SCCOOS of the activity? Is targeted funding available for this specific activity? Potential to leverage existing funds or attract future funds Has the PI been able to attract funding based on SCCOOS funding or a SCCOOS letter of support – and if so can they keep going without base SCCOOS funding? 2Within the “primary” and “other” categories, sequence of criteria is based on a logical progression from broad to specific considerations, and is not intended to imply any prioritization or relative weighting of considerations Appendix 2 SCCOOS Active Signatory Members (as of April 2014) Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Phil Bailey Dean of the College of Science and Mathematics Representative: Mark Moline University of California, Santa Barbara Gaines Director, Marine Science Institute Representatives: Tommy Dickey, Libe Washburn University of Southern California Tony Michaels Director, Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies Representative: Burt University of California, Los Angeles Keith Stolzenbach Director, Coastal Center, Institute of the Environment Representatives: Keith Stolzenbach, James C. McWilliams Jet Propulsion Laboratory/National Aeronautics & Space Administration Diane Evans Science and Technology Directorate Representatives: Ben Holt, Paul DiGiacamo University of California, Irvine William H. Parker Vice Chancellor for Research Representatives: Carl Friehe, George Hunt, Stanley Brett Sanders Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego John Orcutt Deputy Director Representative: John Orcutt, Deputy Director CICESE Javier Mendieta Director General Representive: Francisco Ocampo UABC Guadalupe Garcia Vicerector Representative: Reginaldo Durazo California State University, Los Angeles Carlos Robles Program Director, CEA-CREST
2014_sccoos_strategic_plan_draft.docx