post 104 no Tan, 200841 The looks at comparison of women in physical performance Australia measurements by osteoporotic fracture risk group TUG score 7.8(1.2) seconds non osteoporotic group n=55 TUG score 8.4(1.4 )seconds osteoporotic group n=49 p=NS patients 27 no Johannesson, 2008125 following transtibial removable vacuum formed rigid 41(24) seconds amputation dressing n-13 conventional rigid plaster of 29(14) seconds paris dressing n=10 mean difference 14(-2-30) p=NS at the 3-month follow-up patients with 124 both made Staalesen Strumse, 2009126 rheumatoid progress, arthritis in warm climate did intervention was 4 week or cold climates not matter rehabilitation Mediterranean climate n=72 baseline 13.9(2.4) week 4 baseline-1.5(1.4)ok week 16 - baseline -0.7(1.6) p=0.001 baseline 14.4(3.2) Norwegian climate n=52 week 4 -1.6(2.5) p=0.001 week 16 -1.2(2.4) p=0.002 No difference between groups patients with 19 no pre exercise score 8.77(1.95) Chang,2008127 COPD from an post exercise score 9.01(2.27) The study assessed the affect of institutional p=NS an exercise task(6 minute walk pulmonary test) on TUG performance rehabilitation program Population N Reference, sample size, Responsive Data supporting responsiveness descriptor intervention Yes / No community 19 yes pretest average 11.22 seconds Batson, 2008128 dwelling elderly intervention was 2 of posttest average 9.53 seconds balance instruction using p=0.006 Alexander technique residents of care 249 no baseline 60(42) Sackley, 2007129 homes intervention group n=128 three months 68(50) PT and OT targeted to mobility six months 59(37) baseline 57(54) control group n=121 received three months 59(56) standard care six months 55(37)
post women in Australia 104 Tan, 200841 The looks at comparison of physical performance measurements by osteoporotic fracture risk group non osteoporotic group n=55 osteoporotic group n=49 no TUG score 7.8(1.2) seconds TUG score 8.4(1.4 )seconds p=NS patients following transtibial amputation 27 Johannesson, 2008125 removable vacuum formed rigid dressing n-13 conventional rigid plaster of paris dressing n=10 no 41(24) seconds 29(14) seconds mean difference 14(-2-30) p=NS at the 3-month follow-up patients with rheumatoid arthritis in warm or cold climates 124 Staalesen Strumse, 2009126 intervention was 4 week rehabilitation Mediterranean climate n=72 Norwegian climate n=52 both made progress, climate did not matter baseline 13.9(2.4) week 4 baseline-1.5(1.4)ok week 16 - baseline -0.7(1.6) p=0.001 baseline 14.4(3.2) week 4 -1.6(2.5) p=0.001 week 16 -1.2(2.4) p=0.002 No difference between groups patients with COPD from an institutional pulmonary rehabilitation program 19 Chang,2008127 The study assessed the affect of an exercise task(6 minute walk test) on TUG performance no pre exercise score 8.77(1.95) post exercise score 9.01(2.27) p=NS Population descriptor N Reference, sample size, intervention Responsive Yes / No Data supporting responsiveness community dwelling elderly 19 Batson, 2008128 intervention was 2 of balance instruction using Alexander technique yes pretest average 11.22 seconds posttest average 9.53 seconds p=0.006 residents of care homes 249 Sackley, 2007129 intervention group n=128 PT and OT targeted to mobility control group n=121 received standard care no baseline 60(42) three months 68(50) six months 59(37) baseline 57(54) three months 59(56) six months 55(37)
timed_up_and_go.docx