for flood about the long term prevention, particularly government, prevention / cost effectiveness of for: particularly the mitigation versus Preventative federal level flood information generous funding approaches, through the NSDR risk assessment of relief and coupled with short improved development recovery parliamentary terms planning of office: responsible relocation of those most spending is unlikely at risk and to receive due credit reassignment of land to Political gains in the flood compatible uses short term from a ecosystem approaches well-coordinated Strong promotion to the emergency response; public about the benefits of negative media prevention and actions coverage if efforts are governments are insufficient. undertaking. Establish relevance to all Australians, not just those in flood prone areas (i.e. higher tax and insurance premiums for all) Non-mandatory Conflicting policy Consistent policy, State government is consideration of objectives legislation and planning responsible for flood risk in Short term versus processes to ensure that policy, development long term gains future flood risks are legislation, legislation and Lack of flood mapping assessed and addressed processes. processes Length of time before Mandatory inclusion of Investment in large key instruments are flood controls in local scale mapping due for revision and planning schemes exercises may need complex processes for Nationwide investment in federal funding regular update and cost-effective, basic flood support. inclusion of flood mapping, such as QRA Local government information maps Processes to facilitate responsible for prompt inclusion of new inclusion of flood flood information into local risk in planning planning schemes schemes. Federal government needs to ensure its own development projects consider flood risk.
for flood prevention / mitigation versus generous funding of relief and recovery about the long term cost effectiveness of Preventative approaches, coupled with short parliamentary terms of office: responsible spending is unlikely to receive due credit Political gains in the short term from a well-coordinated emergency response; negative media coverage if efforts are insufficient. prevention, particularly for: flood information risk assessment improved development planning relocation of those most at risk and reassignment of land to flood compatible uses ecosystem approaches Strong promotion to the public about the benefits of prevention and actions governments are undertaking. Establish relevance to all Australians, not just those in flood prone areas (i.e. higher tax and insurance premiums for all) government, particularly the federal level through the NSDR Non-mandatory consideration of flood risk in development legislation and processes Conflicting policy objectives Short term versus long term gains Lack of flood mapping Length of time before key instruments are due for revision and complex processes for regular update and inclusion of flood information Consistent policy, legislation and planning processes to ensure that future flood risks are assessed and addressed Mandatory inclusion of flood controls in local planning schemes Nationwide investment in cost-effective, basic flood mapping, such as QRA maps Processes to facilitate prompt inclusion of new flood information into local planning schemes State government is responsible for policy, legislation, processes. Investment in large scale mapping exercises may need federal funding support. Local government responsible for inclusion of flood risk in planning schemes. Federal government needs to ensure its own development projects consider flood risk.
sub084-disaster-funding.docx