Table 3: Component 1 key findings and recommendations Level of Findings Recommendations Prime Responsibility urgency The extent to which the EOPO is achieved will R1: DFAT and MoEC should reaffirm their commitment to the DFAT and MoEC *** depend upon maximising EOCO contribution as current EOPO. well as encouraging the contribution of other access-related initiatives (see §2.4.3 and 2.4.4) R2: Critically appraise coordination of school construction with DFAT and MoEC (with SSQ and POM other access-related initiatives within MOEC with a view to support) *** maximising the extent of EOPO achievement. is evidence of sub-optimal location of some R3: Further analysis of site selection outcomes should be POM (with MoEC and SSQ support) *** selected sites and improving site selection is both undertaken to provide a robust basis to continue to improve possible and desirable (see §2.4.3) the selection process. R4: DFAT and MoEC should strengthen the site selection DFAT and MoEC (with SSQ support) process by refining factors of JSE demand and supply in the *** selection criteria, and ensuring a strict application of these criteria. A number of lessons on R5: Lessons learned from EP implementation (e.g. regarding MoEC and SSQ construction processes are being learned through monitoring process) should be synthesised and * the EP investment (see §2.4.5) disseminated to interested parties (e.g. MoEC and other GoI institutions/agencies involved in construction processes), should there be merit or demand. NB: Red (***) - high urgency; orange (**) - medium urgency; green (*) - low urgency
Table 3: Component 1 key findings and recommendations Findings Recommendations Level of urgency Prime Responsibility The extent to which the EOPO is achieved will depend upon maximising EOCO contribution as well as encouraging the contribution of other access-related initiatives (see §2.4.3 and 2.4.4) R1: DFAT and MoEC should reaffirm their commitment to the current EOPO. *** DFAT and MoEC R2: Critically appraise coordination of school construction with other access-related initiatives within MOEC with a view to maximising the extent of EOPO achievement. *** DFAT and MoEC (with SSQ and POM support) is evidence of sub-optimal location of some selected sites and improving site selection is both possible and desirable (see §2.4.3) R3: Further analysis of site selection outcomes should be undertaken to provide a robust basis to continue to improve the selection process. *** POM (with MoEC and SSQ support) R4: DFAT and MoEC should strengthen the site selection process by refining factors of JSE demand and supply in the selection criteria, and ensuring a strict application of these criteria. *** DFAT and MoEC (with SSQ support) A number of lessons on construction processes are being learned through the EP investment (see §2.4.5) R5: Lessons learned from EP implementation (e.g. regarding monitoring process) should be synthesised and disseminated to interested parties (e.g. MoEC and other GoI institutions/agencies involved in construction processes), should there be merit or demand. * MoEC and SSQ NB: Red (***) - high urgency; orange (**) - medium urgency; green (*) - low urgency
2013-indonesia-education-annual-partnership-performance-report.docx