mirror reflection (statements 3-7, 11-12). The second principal component “Syn-C2” included statements relating to feelings of a causal relationship between the touch of the cotton bud in the movie and on own face, of being in control of the other one’s face or face being out of control, of face being less vivid person’s one’s one’s one’s than normal and that one was imitating or being imitated by the other person (statements 1-2, 8-10, 15-17). Finally, the third principal component “Syn-C3” included statements that related to the feelings of the other person being attractive and trustworthy (statements 13-14). In the asynchronous condition, analysis of eigenvalues and the scree plot led to the extraction of five components which together accounted for 64.5% of the variance in the data (see Table 2). The first principal component “Asyn-C1” accounted for a large proportion of the variance (35%), and included statements relating to feelings of a causal relationship between the touch of the cotton bud in the movie and own face, of the other face being own face, of one’s person’s one’s owning and being in control of the other face, and of looking at own person’s one’s mirror reflection (statements 1-5, 8). The second principal component “Asyn-C2” included four statements that related to the feelings of the other face person’s beginning to resemble and being similar to own face, as well as feelings of one’s face beginning to resemble and being similar to the other face one’s person’s (statements 6-7, 11-12). The third principal component included “Asyn-C3” statements that related to feelings of being imitated by the other person, of one’s blinks being synchronous with the other blinks, and of affiliation with the person’s other person (statements 16-18). The fourth principal component included “Asyn-C4” two statements that related to the feelings of the other person being attractive and trustworthy (statements 13-14). Finally, the fifth principal component “Asyn-C5”
mirror reflection (statements 3-7, 11-12). The second principal component “Syn-C2” included statements relating to feelings of a causal relationship between the touch of the cotton bud in the movie and on one’s own face, of being in control of the other person’s face or one’s face being out of one’s control, of one’s face being less vivid than normal and that one was imitating or being imitated by the other person (statements 1-2, 8-10, 15-17). Finally, the third principal component “Syn-C3” included statements that related to the feelings of the other person being attractive and trustworthy (statements 13-14). In the asynchronous condition, analysis of eigenvalues and the scree plot led to the extraction of five components which together accounted for 64.5% of the variance in the data (see Table 2). The first principal component “Asyn-C1” accounted for a large proportion of the variance (35%), and included statements relating to feelings of a causal relationship between the touch of the cotton bud in the movie and one’s own face, of the other person’s face being one’s own face, of owning and being in control of the other person’s face, and of looking at one’s own mirror reflection (statements 1-5, 8). The second principal component “Asyn-C2” included four statements that related to the feelings of the other person’s face beginning to resemble and being similar to one’s own face, as well as feelings of one’s face beginning to resemble and being similar to the other person’s face (statements 6-7, 11-12). The third principal component “Asyn-C3” included statements that related to feelings of being imitated by the other person, of one’s blinks being synchronous with the other person’s blinks, and of affiliation with the other person (statements 16-18). The fourth principal component “Asyn-C4” included two statements that related to the feelings of the other person being attractive and trustworthy (statements 13-14). Finally, the fifth principal component “Asyn-C5”
TajaduraJimenez_etal_2012_ConCog.docx