Criteria for the Evaluation of an Assignment Grade A Exemplary B Adequate C Poor Criteria The content related The content was It was unclear as to to the text. The generally relevant, how the content Content writer gave but was somewhat related to the field specific answers unclear or being considered. relevant to the confusing at times. topic. The writer was The writer could The writer did little thought provoking reflect on the topic. more than restate Critical and showed strong A Thoughtful facts and other Analysis insight in applying assessment was people’s (authors’) class materials to included. opinions. the cased or topic. Spelling and Although most of The paper was grammar rules the paper was well poorly written – were followed. written, a more making it difficult Technical writing than a few to determine the rules were grammar, spelling, writers points. Spelling and followed. and/or technical Numerous Grammar errors were grammatical and present. spelling errors were present. The text did not follow rules for technical writing. The paper lacks The paper meets one or a few The paper was the requirements elements that are poorly written. Overall Quality for the degree important for the program for program student is enrolled If at any time during the semester you have a concern for your grade progress, please contact me to set up an appointment for review. My objective is to achieve a fair grade. That is a building process based on your performance as evidenced by the aforementioned factors PLUS your efforts, accomplishments, and improvements towards the course objectives. 9. Course Assignments: TCMG 523 Leadership in Technical Enterprises Class Schedule – –
Criteria for the Evaluation of an Assignment Grade Criteria A Exemplary B Adequate C Poor Content The content related to the text. The writer gave specific answers relevant to the topic. The content was generally relevant, but was somewhat unclear or confusing at times. It was unclear as to how the content related to the field being considered. Critical Analysis The writer was thought provoking and showed strong insight in applying class materials to the cased or topic. The writer could reflect on the topic. A Thoughtful assessment was included. The writer did little more than restate facts and other people’s (authors’) opinions. Spelling and Grammar Spelling and grammar rules were followed. Technical writing rules were followed. Although most of the paper was well written, a more than a few grammar, spelling, and/or technical errors were present. The paper was poorly written – making it difficult to determine the writers points. Numerous grammatical and spelling errors were present. The text did not follow rules for technical writing. Overall Quality The paper meets the requirements for the degree program for student is enrolled The paper lacks one or a few elements that are important for the program The paper was poorly written. If at any time during the semester you have a concern for your grade progress, please contact me to set up an appointment for review. My objective is to achieve a fair grade. That is a building process based on your performance as evidenced by the aforementioned factors PLUS your efforts, accomplishments, and improvements towards the course objectives. 9. Course Assignments: TCMG 523 – Leadership in Technical Enterprises – Class Schedule
TCMG_523_Syllabus_Sp_17-Bowman.docx