Quarter I. Activities to Achieve the Outcomes for the J. Who will K. When will it L. When will it M. What Resources are Initiative Lead? Start? be Complete? Needed? September All educators conduct self-assessment and Teachers and September Pending n/a 2013 professional practice growth goals and student Principals 2013 learning goals. September Evaluators review Professional Practice Goals Principals September Pending SIPs, AIP (PPG) for alignment with Improvement plans and 2013 2013 district priorities and approve goals. October OOI reviews PPG growth to check for SRV partners October 2013 October 2013 n/a alignment with PD activities—will activities lead to 2013 accomplished goals? November District level Professional Development Director of November December 2013 n/a 2013 Committee is convened examine evaluations of Professional 2013 PD offerings, catalogue existing PD according to Development Teacher Standards and Level of Plan directed, etc.) as defined in Educator Evaluation Handbook, and to define gaps in PD system based on cited needs and goals of educators. January Evaluators conduct mid-cycle formative Executive January 2014 February 2014 n/a 2014 evaluations with teachers in order to review Director of HR & progress on and/or revise PPG and Student SRV Partner Learning Goals. Data is compiled by SRV partner to identify teachers that are in need of more support and ensure proposed PD activities will meet intended outcomes. June Summer PD offerings, are aligned with district Director of June 2014 August 2014 Stipends for teachers and 2014 priorities and teachers’ needs, and are made Professional funding for PD providers. available to teachers. Development Quarterly Progress Rating (QPR) of the Strategic Initiative Key: P = Process, O = Outcome September December January 2012 March June August 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 P O
Quarter I. Activities to Achieve the Outcomes for the Initiative J. Who will Lead? K. When will it Start? L. When will it be Complete? M. What Resources are Needed? September 2013 All educators conduct self-assessment and professional practice growth goals and student learning goals. Teachers and Principals September 2013 Pending n/a September 2013 Evaluators review Professional Practice Goals (PPG) for alignment with Improvement plans and district priorities and approve goals. Principals September 2013 Pending SIPs, AIP October 2013 OOI reviews PPG growth to check for alignment with PD activities—will activities lead to accomplished goals? SRV partners October 2013 October 2013 n/a November 2013 District level Professional Development Committee is convened examine evaluations of PD offerings, catalogue existing PD according to Teacher Standards and Level of Plan directed, etc.) as defined in Educator Evaluation Handbook, and to define gaps in PD system based on cited needs and goals of educators. Director of Professional Development November 2013 December 2013 n/a January 2014 Evaluators conduct mid-cycle formative evaluations with teachers in order to review progress on and/or revise PPG and Student Learning Goals. Data is compiled by SRV partner to identify teachers that are in need of more support and ensure proposed PD activities will meet intended outcomes. Executive Director of HR & SRV Partner January 2014 February 2014 n/a June 2014 Summer PD offerings, are aligned with district priorities and teachers’ needs, and are made available to teachers. Director of Professional Development June 2014 August 2014 Stipends for teachers and funding for PD providers. Quarterly Progress Rating (QPR) of the Strategic Initiative Key: P = Process, O = Outcome September 2012 December 2012 January 2012 March 2013 June 2013 August 2013 P O
2013-0095.docx