Number of Calculations (range of the expression of the characteristic, Equation for the characteristic value Ui equivalent to candidate COUNTRY Method: description and the characteristic values i the upper limit of state/note variety’s equivalent to the limits of the mean is states/notes) are based on based on Range and limits based on Combined use of example means of all reference Method 1 varieties and reference current year Where is the current-year mean of all reference varieties varieties given each note in the collection given note i the previous year previous year France Adjusted means from COY Where is the intercept from the regression of notes for a Range based on 5-year means for program + linear set of example varieties on their 5-year means a set of example varieties. Limits Method 2 regression method 2 (3?) years based on coefficients of regression And is the slope from the regression of notes for a set of calibrated with example of their notes on these. example varieties on their 5-year means varieties Range based on 10-year means of Where is the characteristic value equivalent to the upper Adjusted Full Assessment example varieties. Limits adjusted limit of state/note i in the fundamental assessment table Table (FAT) : states Japan proportional to the current year current year (FAT) determined with historical mean of an example variety data of example varieties And is the current year mean of example variety A relative to its 10 year mean And is the 10 year mean of example variety A Range of expression of the over-year means for Where is the maximum over year reference variety mean Range and limits based on means United the reference collection And is the minimum over year reference variety mean Method 1 over any years where reference 2 (3?) years Kingdom varieties (for the past 10 varieties have been tested And is the number of notes years) divided into equal spaced states
COUNTRY Method: description Calculations (range of expression of the characteristic, and the characteristic values equivalent to the limits of the states/notes) are based on Equation for the characteristic value Ui equivalent to the upper limit of state/note i Number of the candidate variety’s mean is based on France Method 1 Combined use of example varieties and reference collection Range and limits based on means of all reference varieties given each note in the previous year Where is the current-year mean of all reference varieties given note i the previous year current year Method 2 Adjusted means from COY program + linear regression method calibrated with example varieties Range based on 5-year means for a set of example varieties. Limits based on coefficients of regression of their notes on these. Where is the intercept from the regression of notes for a set of example varieties on their 5-year means And is the slope from the regression of notes for a set of example varieties on their 5-year means 2 (3?) years Japan Adjusted Full Assessment Table (FAT) : states determined with historical data of example varieties Range based on 10-year means of example varieties. Limits adjusted proportional to the current year mean of an example variety relative to its 10 year mean Where is the characteristic value equivalent to the upper limit of state/note i in the fundamental assessment table (FAT) And is the current year mean of example variety A And is the 10 year mean of example variety A current year United Kingdom Method 1 Range of expression of the over-year means for the reference collection varieties (for the past 10 years) divided into equal spaced states Range and limits based on means over any years where reference varieties have been tested Where is the maximum over year reference variety mean And is the minimum over year reference variety mean And is the number of notes 2 (3?) years
tc_54_18.docx