Cambridge, Massachusetts. Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah. 2010. the veil of ignorance only a concept about risk? An “Is experiment.” 94: 1062-1066. Journal of Public Economics, Traub, Stefan, Christian Seidl, Ulrich Schmidt and Maria V. Levati. 2005. “Friedman, Harsnyi, Rawls, Boulding or somebody else? An experimental investigation of – distributive justice.” 24: 283-309. Social Choice and Welfare, Table 1. Possible distributional allocations in the allocation stage Alternatives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Player 1 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Player 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Table 2. Summary statistics of subjects' choices in the allocation stage 75-threshold treatment Alternatives Frequency Percentage 1 9 14.75 14.75 2 2 3.28 18.03 3 1 1.64 19.67 4 3 4.92 24.59 5 1 1.64 26.23 6 4 6.56 32.75 7 2 3.28 36.07 8 6 9.84 45.09 9 33 54.10 100.00 61 100.00 0-threshold treatment Alternatives Frequency Percentage 1 11 15.71 15.71 2 2 2.86 18.57 3 2 2.86 21.43 4 8 11.43 32.86 5 8 11.43 44.29 6 8 11.43 55.71
Cambridge, Massachusetts. Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah. 2010. “Is the veil of ignorance only a concept about risk? An experiment.” Journal of Public Economics, 94: 1062-1066. Traub, Stefan, Christian Seidl, Ulrich Schmidt and Maria V. Levati. 2005. “Friedman, Harsnyi, Rawls, Boulding – or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice.” Social Choice and Welfare, 24: 283-309. Table 1. Possible distributional allocations in the allocation stage Alternatives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Player 1 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Player 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Table 2. Summary statistics of subjects' choices in the allocation stage 75-threshold treatment Alternatives Frequency Percentage 1 2 9 2 14.75 3.28 14.75 18.03 3 4 1 3 1.64 4.92 19.67 24.59 5 6 1 4 1.64 6.56 26.23 32.75 7 8 9 2 6 33 3.28 9.84 54.10 36.07 45.09 100.00 61 100.00 0-threshold treatment Alternatives Frequency Percentage 1 2 11 2 15.71 2.86 15.71 18.57 3 4 2 8 2.86 11.43 21.43 32.86 5 6 8 8 11.43 11.43 44.29 55.71
Teng_Wang_Yang.docx