Organisation/company name Telephone number/Cell phone number and e-mail address of contact person Type of services provided; Period of the services were provided Points will be allocated on a sliding scale of 2 for each positive provided for. Minimum threshold score 60 Points Total 100 Points 7.2 Service Providers that then qualify in terms of the functionality cut-off points of will then be evaluated in terms of price and preference point system. 60 points 7.3 Functionality rating scales The bids will be evaluated on a scale of 1-5. Each panel member will rate individual criterion on the score sheet using the following scale: Value Description 5 Excellent Meets and exceed the functionality requirements – 4 Very Good average compliance to the requirements – 3 Good Satisfactory and should be adequate for stated element – 2 Average Compliance to the requirements – 1 Poor Unacceptable, does not meet set criteria – The value scored for each criterion will be multiplied with the specified weighting for the relevant criterion to obtain the marks scored for each criterion. Theses marks will be added and expressed as a fraction of the best possible score for all criteria. This score will be converted to a percentage and only bidders that have met or exceeded the minimum threshold of 60% for overall functionality will be evaluated and scored in terms 90/10 preference point system. A bidder/s that less than 60% points in respect of overall functionality will be regarded as submitting a non-responsive bid and will be disqualified. Bidder/s that the minimum required percentage or minimum points, will be evaluated in terms of price and preference as per the PPPFA Act, No.5 of 2000 and its associated Regulations issued by the National Treasury.
Organisation/company name Telephone number/Cell phone number and e-mail address of contact person Type of services provided; Period of the services were provided Points will be allocated on a sliding scale of 2 for each positive provided for. Minimum threshold score 60 Points Total 100 Points 7.2 Service Providers that then qualify in terms of the functionality cut-off points of 60 points will then be evaluated in terms of price and preference point system. 7.3 Functionality rating scales The bids will be evaluated on a scale of 1-5. Each panel member will rate individual criterion on the score sheet using the following scale: Value Description 5 – Excellent Meets and exceed the functionality requirements 4 – Very Good average compliance to the requirements 3 – Good Satisfactory and should be adequate for stated element 2 – Average Compliance to the requirements 1 – Poor Unacceptable, does not meet set criteria The value scored for each criterion will be multiplied with the specified weighting for the relevant criterion to obtain the marks scored for each criterion. Theses marks will be added and expressed as a fraction of the best possible score for all criteria. This score will be converted to a percentage and only bidders that have met or exceeded the minimum threshold of 60% for overall functionality will be evaluated and scored in terms 90/10 preference point system. A bidder/s that less than 60% points in respect of overall functionality will be regarded as submitting a non-responsive bid and will be disqualified. Bidder/s that the minimum required percentage or minimum points, will be evaluated in terms of price and preference as per the PPPFA Act, No.5 of 2000 and its associated Regulations issued by the National Treasury.
TECHNICAL%20DRAWINGS%20PORT%20ELIZABETH%20ANNEXURE%20B-%2002%20SEP%202015.docx