OA, awaiting Adults w/ OA (n=59) compared to w/o OA: 7.4 (.5) s TKR adults w/o OA (n=79) Females w/o OA: 7.6 (.3) s Group diff: p<.001 Persons 97 yes Hui, 200986 Intervention n=52 Baseline 7.5(1.43) 23 sessions of dance over twelve three months 6.97(0.92) weeks change -0.58(0.95) Control group n=45 baseline 7.58(0.95) no intervention three months 7.47(1.12) change -1.12(0.62) p=0.01 Patients with 200 yes Gandhi, 200925 hip and knee joint preoperative TUG scores 18.6(7.9) seconds n=200 replacements 12 week follow-up 12.8(4.7) seconds n=200 p ˂0.0001 Patients 66 yes Bruun-Olsen 200987 following total Intervention group n=30 knee CPM and active exercise arthroplasty preoperative TUG 12(4) seconds Control Group n=33 active exercise alone 3 months postoperative TUG 11(5) seconds preoperative TUG 13±6 seconds 3 months postoperative TUG 12±6 seconds elderly 62 Both groups inpatients intervention group n=33 received improved baseline 27.6 high intensity strength training 3 15.90 weeks p<0.0001 baseline 29.6 control n=29 received regular final 17.60 intensity strength training Population N Reference, sample size, Responsive Data supporting descriptor intervention Yes / No responsiveness Older females 31 yes Murphy, 200889 who have or Intervention was 2x/wk 12 weeks post intervention -1.4, are at risk for of Tai Chi 1day at home p<<0.0001 n=31 osteoporosis 6 months post intervention -1.4, p<0.0001 n=29 12 months post intervention -1.1 p<0.001 n=30 older residents 149 no Peri, 200790 living in residential care baseline 29.2(2.4) facility in 3 months 27.8(2.4)
OA, awaiting TKR Adults w/ OA (n=59) compared to adults w/o OA (n=79) w/o OA: 7.4 (.5) s Females w/o OA: 7.6 (.3) s Group diff: p<.001 Persons 97 Hui, 200986 Intervention n=52 23 sessions of dance over twelve weeks Control group n=45 no intervention yes Baseline 7.5(1.43) three months 6.97(0.92) change -0.58(0.95) baseline 7.58(0.95) three months 7.47(1.12) change -1.12(0.62) p=0.01 Patients with hip and knee joint replacements 200 Gandhi, 200925 preoperative TUG scores n=200 12 week follow-up n=200 yes 18.6(7.9) seconds 12.8(4.7) seconds p ˂0.0001 Patients following total knee arthroplasty 66 Bruun-Olsen 200987 Intervention group n=30 CPM and active exercise Control Group n=33 active exercise alone yes preoperative TUG 12(4) seconds 3 months postoperative TUG 11(5) seconds preoperative TUG 13±6 seconds 3 months postoperative TUG 12±6 seconds elderly inpatients 62 intervention group n=33 received high intensity strength training 3 weeks control n=29 received regular intensity strength training Both groups improved baseline 27.6 15.90 p<0.0001 baseline 29.6 final 17.60 Population descriptor N Reference, sample size, intervention Responsive Yes / No Data supporting responsiveness Older females who have or are at risk for osteoporosis 31 Murphy, 200889 Intervention was 2x/wk 12 weeks of Tai Chi 1day at home yes post intervention -1.4, p<<0.0001 n=31 6 months post intervention -1.4, p<0.0001 n=29 12 months post intervention -1.1 p<0.001 n=30 older residents living in residential care facility in 149 Peri, 200790 no baseline 29.2(2.4) 3 months 27.8(2.4)
timed_up_and_go.docx