Incomplete description of student Discusses growth made by student Exceptionally thorough, progress or unsubstantiated with support for conclusions from well-written and insightful. assertions of student progress. assessments, work products, Thorough description of Candidate shows no deepening of anecdotal notes & observations. student growth with clear, understanding over time. Candidate discusses how her/his accurate examples from Results, student understanding of the student work with child supporting progress changed over time. Refers to all assertions. Candidate logbook, work samples, and demonstrates an assessments to support conclusions. exceptionally deep and Provides work samples. nuanced understanding of literacy problems. student’s No progress by student. Student makes adequate progress. Student makes exceptional Impact on student progress for given time. learning The candidate fails to match The candidate makes mostly Recommends the most recommendations to the specific appropriate recommendations, appropriate or effective Recommendations needs of the student or recommends demonstrating sensitivity to the strategies and activities for ACEI 5.2 activities beyond the capacity of the resources available to each the student. Communicating w/ audience. audience. families and collaborating with other professionals evaluation of his or her Reflections after each session Reflections after each Candidate’s session demonstrate insight own teaching fails to recognize true document what happened and Reflection into the student as a learner; strengths and weaknesses. Or provide some reason for why parts AECI St. 5.1 includes consideration of Trinity Unit Goal went well or did not go well. In the Superficial; fails to provide support alternative explanations. In Counts Double report discusses the strengths and report, exceptionally for assertions. OR (Includes reflections weaknesses of the work with this thorough and insightful Missing or incomplete discussion of work with written after each student. Accurately recognizes child. Supports all or nearly session and summary strengths and weaknesses of work. all assertions with clear, reflections in report.) Makes appropriate suggestions of accurate work samples. things to do differently if given a chance to do it over. Recognizes additional information that would be useful to in attaining a better understanding of the student
Results, student progress Incomplete description of student progress or unsubstantiated assertions of student progress. Candidate shows no deepening of understanding over time. Discusses growth made by student with support for conclusions from assessments, work products, anecdotal notes & observations. Candidate discusses how her/his understanding of the student changed over time. Refers to logbook, work samples, and assessments to support conclusions. Provides work samples. Exceptionally thorough, well-written and insightful. Thorough description of student growth with clear, accurate examples from work with child supporting all assertions. Candidate demonstrates an exceptionally deep and nuanced understanding of student’s literacy problems. Impact on student learning No progress by student. Student makes adequate progress. Student makes exceptional progress for given time. Recommendations ACEI 5.2 Communicating w/ families and collaborating with other professionals The candidate fails to match recommendations to the specific needs of the student or recommends activities beyond the capacity of the audience. The candidate makes mostly appropriate recommendations, demonstrating sensitivity to the resources available to each audience. Recommends the most appropriate or effective strategies and activities for the student. Reflection AECI St. 5.1 Trinity Unit Goal Counts Double (Includes reflections written after each session and summary reflections in report.) Candidate’s evaluation of his or her own teaching fails to recognize true strengths and weaknesses. Or Superficial; fails to provide support for assertions. OR Missing or incomplete Reflections after each session document what happened and provide some reason for why parts went well or did not go well. In the report discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the work with this student. Accurately recognizes strengths and weaknesses of work. Makes appropriate suggestions of things to do differently if given a chance to do it over. Recognizes additional information that would be useful to in attaining a better understanding of the student Reflections after each session demonstrate insight into the student as a learner; includes consideration of alternative explanations. In report, exceptionally thorough and insightful discussion of work with child. Supports all or nearly all assertions with clear, accurate work samples.
2014-2015-CAS-Education-Program-Review-and-Assessment.docx