observer or full of member (2015) 1 - Participation 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2 level in past eight meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended 1 - Government No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 endorsement support of term perspective for endorsement 2 - Responsive to only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 6 Change of NDA organisation B. Data delivery (up to Score Comments 1 - Data delivered none 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 2013 in past five for just one year for two or years more years 2016) 0 - MDS data 2016 0 1 2 Not available Not yet but complete and delivered expected in time 2 - Accuracy of more than 40% 0 between 10% 1 less than 10% 2 2013 coding (most unknown and 40% unknown current unknown delivery) 1 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper 1 Reference 2 2013 or not for last population file delivery for 2016 1 - Consistency of IR not available 0 not consistent or 1 Consistent 2 unclear case definition unclear (IDB & HDR or EDR) 2 Scope of data Two or more Just one No 2 “warning collection “warning flags” “warning flag” flag” 0 - FDS sample Not available 0 Not yet but 1 Complete and 2 2016 expected in time B. Total score (max. 14) 7 Data collection stopped after JAMIE C. Current system in place (2017) Score Comments 1 Data collection 0 1 2 no data & no plan no data but Collected & Shift to new ongoing to (re)start restart planned / delivery partner data delivery certain (Catalonia) uncertain 2 - Age groups not covering the 0 All ages in most 1 all ages in all 2 2013 full age-span of the hospitals hospitals 2 - Injury less than 0 At least home, 1 all injuries 2 2013 categories leisure & school 2 - Outpatients none or strongly 0 biased toward 1 All HDs + all 2 2013
observer or full member of (2015) - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the eight meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 1 - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 1 - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 2 A. Total score (max. 8) 6 Change of NDA organisation B. Data delivery (up to Score Comments - Data delivered in past five years none 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 1 2013 - MDS data 2016 delivered Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 complete and in time 2 0 - Accuracy of coding (most current delivery) more than 40% unknown 0 between 10% and 40% unknown 1 less than 10% unknown 2 2 2013 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper or not for last delivery 1 Reference population file for 2016 2 1 2013 - Consistency of case definition (IDB & HDR or EDR) IR not available 0 not consistent or unclear 1 Consistent 2 1 unclear Scope of data collection Two or more “warning flags” Just one “warning flag” No “warning flag” 2 2 - FDS sample 2016 Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 Complete and in time 2 0 B. Total score (max. 14) 7 Data collection stopped after JAMIE C. Current system in place (2017) Score Comments Data collection ongoing no data & no plan to (re)start 0 no data but restart planned / data delivery uncertain 1 Collected & delivery certain 2 1 Shift to new partner (Catalonia) - Age groups not covering the full age-span 0 All ages in most of the hospitals 1 all ages in all hospitals 2 2 2013 - Injury categories less than 0 At least home, leisure & school 1 all injuries 2 2 2013 - Outpatients none or strongly 0 biased toward 1 All HDs + all 2 2 2013 2016)
Sustainability%20Report.docx