National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: MALTA August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as 2 not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 observer or full of member (2015) network - Participation 2 0 1 2 2 or less of the 3-4 of the at least 5 level in past seven meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended - Government 2 No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 endorsement support of term perspective for endorsement participation - Responsive to 2 only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered 2 none 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 in past five for just one year for two or years more years - MDS data 2014 1 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 complete and 2 Not yet due to IT delivered expected in time problem - Accuracy of 1 more than 40% 0 between 10% 1 less than 10% 2 About 11% in coding (most unknown and 40% unknown 2011. Not current unknown reported for 2013 delivery) Incidence rate 1 Not available 0 Only on paper 1 Reference 2 or not for last population file delivery for 2014 - Consistency of 1 IR not available 0 not consistent or 1 Fully 2 unclear case definition unclear consistent (IDB & HDR or EDR) Scope of data 2 Two or more Just one No 2 “warning collection “warning flags” “warning flag” flag” - FDS sample 1 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 Complete and 2 Not yet 2014 expected in time B. Total score (max. 14) 9 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection 2 0 1 2 no data & no plan no data but Collected &
National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: MALTA August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the seven meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 2 - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 2 - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 2 A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered in past five years none 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 2 - MDS data 2014 delivered Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 complete and in time 2 1 Not yet due to IT problem - Accuracy of coding (most current delivery) more than 40% unknown 0 between 10% and 40% unknown 1 less than 10% unknown 2 1 About 11% in 2011. Not reported for 2013 Incidence rate Not available 0 Only on paper or not for last delivery 1 Reference population file for 2014 2 1 - Consistency of case definition (IDB & HDR or EDR) IR not available 0 not consistent or unclear 1 Fully consistent 2 1 unclear Scope of data collection Two or more “warning flags” Just one “warning flag” No “warning flag” 2 2 - FDS sample 2014 Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 Complete and in time 2 1 Not yet B. Total score (max. 14) 9 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection no data & no plan 0 no data but 1 Collected & 2 2 participation network
Sustainability%20Report.docx