Section 2 Staff recruitment – TABLE 12 RECRUITMENT BY EQUALITY GROUP – MALE FEMALE BME WHITE ETHNICITY DISABLED NOT NOT DISABLED* Heads Heads % Heads % Heads % % Heads % % Heads % 2011 Applied 4418 2470 56% 1934 44% 1027 23% 3338 76% 53 1.2% 175 4.0% 4243 96% Shortlisted 943 454 48% 488 52% 138 15% 794 84% 11 1.2% 35 3.7% 908 96% Appointed 274 123 45% 150 55% 31 11% 238 87% 5 1.8% 9 3.3% 265 97% 2010 Applied 5340 3223 60% 2117 40% 888 17% 4107 77% 345 6.5% 254 4.8% 5086 95% Shortlisted 1221 597 49% 624 51% 126 10% 1027 84% 68 5.6% 57 4.7% 1164 95% Appointed 357 164 46% 193 54% 35 10% 309 87% 13 3.6% 14 3.9% 343 96% 2009 Applied 9343 4262 46% 5081 54% 1,539 17% 7232 77% 572 6.1% 139 1.5% 9204 99% Shortlisted 1469 693 47% 776 53% 166 11% 1212 83% 91 6.2% 16 1.1% 1453 99% Appointed 385 175 45% 210 55% 37 10% 323 84% 25 6.5% 7 1.8% 378 98% * Figures for Disabled” include applicants who did not provide data. “Not From 2011 data relates to the period August to July. The volume of staff recruitment declined by 23% in 2011. This is due to the University carrying out major restructuring programmes to achieve cost savings. The number of job applicants decreased by 17% over 2010 due to the temporary policy of jobs being advertised internally first. The 2011 figures show that the success rate for female applicants through the recruitment process continues to be better than for male applicants. 2011 showed a further increase on 2010 in the proportion of BME applicants. The proportion of BME applicants being appointed increased to 11%, although BME applicants still have a lower rate of success through the recruitment process than non-BME staff. In 2011 there has been a reduction in applicants declaring as disabled. TABLE 13 - RECRUITMENT TO THE TEMPORARY STAFF BANK BY EQUALITY GROUP
Section 2 – Staff recruitment TABLE 12 – RECRUITMENT BY EQUALITY GROUP MALE FEMALE BME WHITE ETHNICITY NOT DISABLED NOT DISABLED* Heads Heads % Heads % Heads % % Heads % % Heads % 2011 Applied Shortlisted Appointed 4418 943 274 2470 454 123 56% 48% 45% 1934 488 150 44% 52% 55% 1027 138 31 23% 15% 11% 3338 794 238 76% 84% 87% 53 11 5 1.2% 1.2% 1.8% 175 35 9 4.0% 3.7% 3.3% 4243 908 265 96% 96% 97% 2010 Applied Shortlisted Appointed 5340 1221 357 3223 597 164 60% 49% 46% 2117 624 193 40% 51% 54% 888 126 35 17% 10% 10% 4107 1027 309 77% 84% 87% 345 68 13 6.5% 5.6% 3.6% 254 57 14 4.8% 4.7% 3.9% 5086 1164 343 95% 95% 96% 2009 Applied Shortlisted Appointed 9343 1469 385 4262 693 175 46% 47% 45% 5081 776 210 54% 53% 55% 1,539 166 37 17% 11% 10% 7232 1212 323 77% 83% 84% 572 91 25 6.1% 6.2% 6.5% 139 16 7 1.5% 1.1% 1.8% 9204 1453 378 99% 99% 98% * Figures for “Not Disabled” include applicants who did not provide data. From 2011 data relates to the period August to July. The volume of staff recruitment declined by 23% in 2011. This is due to the University carrying out major restructuring programmes to achieve cost savings. The number of job applicants decreased by 17% over 2010 due to the temporary policy of jobs being advertised internally first. The 2011 figures show that the success rate for female applicants through the recruitment process continues to be better than for male applicants. 2011 showed a further increase on 2010 in the proportion of BME applicants. The proportion of BME applicants being appointed increased to 11%, although BME applicants still have a lower rate of success through the recruitment process than non-BME staff. In 2011 there has been a reduction in applicants declaring as disabled. TABLE 13 - RECRUITMENT TO THE TEMPORARY STAFF BANK BY EQUALITY GROUP
Staffing-Compendium-2011.docx