Study details Population and Plan details and Outcomes Results Notes setting method of appraisal assessed* Authors Country: Plan: Outcomes measured: An explicit objective of the Limitations identified HIA was to use it as a tool S., Parry, N., England Planning Study to a) Process outcomes: by author(s): to increase participation of Rimmington, B. inform consultation (i) Health outcomes None local communities in considered: Y Setting (eg process on the M1 strategic development (ii) Health Year: Unknown, but likely mix Corridor Strategic Limitations identified decisions for the area. The recommendations 2004 of urban & rural Economic Zone by review team: methodological framework incorporated in plan: Authors prepared the (Objective 1 investment used was a modification of Y Citation: Population: HIA programme). the Merseyside guidelines (iii) Evidence of being Environmental Impact (size, characteristics…) with a focus on equity. implemented: Y Assessment Review 24 Parts of Rotherham & Evidence gaps &/or (iv) Post-adoption The HIA process helped to (2004) 255–267. 2004 Sheffield within the M1 recommendations for Method of appraisal: evaluation: NR articulate not only local motorway corridor future research: community concerns, but b) Specific issues: HIA also potential solutions, Aim of study: (i) Physical activity: NR and that understanding (ii) Mental wellbeing: Y A critical reflection upon Source of funding: and dialogue between key (iii) Air / noise quality etc: the experience of stakeholders had Y undertaking a Unknown increased as a result. (iv) Unintentional injury: comprehensive and NR participatory health The final 2001 delivery (v) Other health: Y plan for the M1 Corridor impact assessment in Specify: Strategic Economic Zone, Sheffield’s East End. set out requirements for - range of physical individual site Integrated Study design: environment Implementation Plans Review of process & improvements including: (IIPs) to which developers traffic reduction, upgrade outcome of participatory have to adhere to receive of local amenities, HIA, plus post adoption Obj 1 investment. The IIPs derelict land evaluation require a ‘community improvements development’ plan, and - comprehensive labour some additional elements Quality score: market strategy on environmental and + - public engagement local employment issues, reflecting HIA c) Knowledge outcome: External validity recommendations. Planners health score: knowledge or skills: NR Post-adoption + Evaluation
Study details Population and setting Plan details and method of appraisal Outcomes assessed* Results Notes Authors S., Parry, N., Rimmington, B. Year: 2004 Citation: Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24 (2004) 255–267. 2004 Aim of study: A critical reflection upon the experience of undertaking a comprehensive and participatory health impact assessment in Sheffield’s East End. Study design: Review of process & outcome of participatory HIA, plus post adoption evaluation Quality score: + External validity score: + Country: England Setting (eg Unknown, but likely mix of urban & rural Population: (size, characteristics…) Parts of Rotherham & Sheffield within the M1 motorway corridor Plan: Planning Study to inform consultation process on the M1 Corridor Strategic Economic Zone (Objective 1 investment programme). Method of appraisal: HIA Outcomes measured: a) Process outcomes: (i) Health outcomes considered: Y (ii) Health recommendations incorporated in plan: Y (iii) Evidence of being implemented: Y (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: NR b) Specific issues: (i) Physical activity: NR (ii) Mental wellbeing: Y (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Y (iv) Unintentional injury: NR (v) Other health: Y Specify: - range of physical environment improvements including: traffic reduction, upgrade of local amenities, derelict land improvements - comprehensive labour market strategy - public engagement c) Knowledge outcome: Planners health knowledge or skills: NR An explicit objective of the HIA was to use it as a tool to increase participation of local communities in strategic development decisions for the area. The methodological framework used was a modification of the Merseyside guidelines with a focus on equity. The HIA process helped to articulate not only local community concerns, but also potential solutions, and that understanding and dialogue between key stakeholders had increased as a result. The final 2001 delivery plan for the M1 Corridor Strategic Economic Zone, set out requirements for individual site Integrated Implementation Plans (IIPs) to which developers have to adhere to receive Obj 1 investment. The IIPs require a ‘community development’ plan, and some additional elements on environmental and local employment issues, reflecting HIA recommendations. Post-adoption Evaluation Limitations identified by author(s): None Limitations identified by review team: Authors prepared the HIA Evidence gaps &/or recommendations for future research: Source of funding: Unknown
Spatial_planning_for_Health_Review2_Final_1_April_2010_rev_21_April.docx