The goal of Roy Allen Elementary is to increase the percent of students scoring at proficiency as evidenced by improved performance on FCAT 2.0. As of Spring 2012, 59% of students performed at or above satisfactory (Level 3 or higher) on the Reading FCAT 2.0. As of Spring 2013, the desired goal is for 64% of the students to demonstrate satisfactory progress (Level 3 or higher) as measured by Reading FCAT 2.0. As of Spring 2012, 66% of students performed at or above satisfactory (Level 3 or higher) on the Math FCAT 2.0. As of Spring 2013, the desired goal is for 69% of the students to demonstrate satisfactory progress (Level 3 or higher) as measured by math FCAT 2.0. Based on the RtI process providing immediate and targeted interventions, students will demonstrate increased success in school as evidenced by improved classroom performance and student work samples. APPENDIX A (ALL SCHOOLS) Reading Goal 2012 Current 2013 Expected As of Spring 2012, 59% of students performed at or above Level of Level of satisfactory (Level 3 or higher) on the Reading FCAT 2.0. Performance Performance As of Spring 2013, the desired goal is for 62% of the (Enter percentage (Enter percentage information and the number information and the students to demonstrate satisfactory progress (Level 3 or of students that percentage number of students that higher) as measured by math FCAT 2.0. reflects ie. 28%=129 percentage reflects ie. 31%=1134 students) students) Anticipated Barrier(s): 1. Strategy(s): 1. FCAT 2.0 59% (167 students) 62% (177 students) Students scoring at Achievement Level 3 Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at levels 4, 5, and 6 in N/A N/A Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. FCAT 2.0 30% (85 students) 33% (95students) Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in Reading Barrier(s): Previously the focus in Kid Talk meetings was on Tier 2 and Tier 3 instruction only. Strategy(s):
The goal of Roy Allen Elementary is to increase the percent of students scoring at proficiency as evidenced by improved performance on FCAT 2.0. As of Spring 2012, 59% of students performed at or above satisfactory (Level 3 or higher) on the Reading FCAT 2.0. As of Spring 2013, the desired goal is for 64% of the students to demonstrate satisfactory progress (Level 3 or higher) as measured by Reading FCAT 2.0. As of Spring 2012, 66% of students performed at or above satisfactory (Level 3 or higher) on the Math FCAT 2.0. As of Spring 2013, the desired goal is for 69% of the students to demonstrate satisfactory progress (Level 3 or higher) as measured by math FCAT 2.0. Based on the RtI process providing immediate and targeted interventions, students will demonstrate increased success in school as evidenced by improved classroom performance and student work samples. APPENDIX A (ALL SCHOOLS) Reading Goal As of Spring 2012, 59% of students performed at or above satisfactory (Level 3 or higher) on the Reading FCAT 2.0. As of Spring 2013, the desired goal is for 62% of the students to demonstrate satisfactory progress (Level 3 or higher) as measured by math FCAT 2.0. 2012 Current Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects ie. 28%=129 students) 2013 Expected Level of Performance (Enter percentage information and the number of students that percentage reflects ie. 31%=1134 students) Anticipated Barrier(s): 1. Strategy(s): 1. FCAT 2.0 Students scoring at Achievement Level 3 Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. 59% (167 students) 62% (177 students) Florida Alternate Assessment: Students scoring at levels 4, 5, and 6 in Reading Barrier(s): Strategy(s): 1. N/A N/A FCAT 2.0 Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in Reading Barrier(s): Previously the focus in Kid Talk meetings was on Tier 2 and Tier 3 instruction only. Strategy(s): 30% (85 students) 33% (95students)
Roy%20Allen%20Elementary.docx