to an overall synthesized but lacked synthesize the synthesize the synthesize the conclusion. an overall conclusion. findings findings findings Use of literature Extensive discussion Good discussion of Moderate discussion Moderate to little Little to no discussion of relevant literature relevant literature to of relevant literature, discussion of of relevant literature, to support acceptance support acceptance or not all literature was relevant literature, papers were or rejection of rejection of appropriate or and/or little mentioned without hypotheses hypotheses clearly explained explanation of how further discussion cited literature related to the findings Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 or 0 Organization Excellent Good organization, Problematic Problematic Poorly organized, organization, few to few grammatical organization, some organization, unable to follow no grammatical errors or awkward sections were poorly difficult to follow, progression of errors wording structured and awkward wording at thought, many difficult to follow, times, some grammatical errors some grammatical grammatical errors errors Literature Citations Literature cited in Cited in correct format Cited in correct Cited in correct Minimal to no correct format, with few errors, 5 format with some format with many literature cited and/or includes more than 5 articles from the errors, and/or 4 errors, and/or 3 or improper sources articles from the primary literature articles from the less articles from the cited, and/or improper primary literature, all cited, all papers primary literature primary literature citation in the text. papers appropriately appropriately cited in cited, some errors in cited, some errors in cited in the text. the text. citation of papers in citation of papers in the text. the text. Total [50]
to an overall conclusion. synthesized but lacked an overall conclusion. synthesize the findings synthesize the findings synthesize the findings Use of literature Extensive discussion of relevant literature to support acceptance or rejection of hypotheses Good discussion of relevant literature to support acceptance or rejection of hypotheses Moderate discussion of relevant literature, not all literature was appropriate or clearly explained Moderate to little discussion of relevant literature, and/or little explanation of how cited literature related to the findings Little to no discussion of relevant literature, papers were mentioned without further discussion Presentation 5 4 3 2 1 or 0 Organization Excellent organization, few to no grammatical errors Good organization, few grammatical errors or awkward wording Problematic organization, some sections were poorly structured and difficult to follow, some grammatical errors Problematic organization, difficult to follow, awkward wording at times, some grammatical errors Poorly organized, unable to follow progression of thought, many grammatical errors Literature Citations Literature cited in correct format, includes more than 5 articles from the primary literature, all papers appropriately cited in the text. Cited in correct format with few errors, 5 articles from the primary literature cited, all papers appropriately cited in the text. Cited in correct format with some errors, and/or 4 articles from the primary literature cited, some errors in citation of papers in the text. Cited in correct format with many errors, and/or 3 or less articles from the primary literature cited, some errors in citation of papers in the text. Minimal to no literature cited and/or improper sources cited, and/or improper citation in the text. Total [50]
Rubrics%20for%20the%20Stream%20Study%20Assignments.docx