Our opinion is that the better method is to keep original setup instructions and just replace picture based on the original setup. 3.7.4 b Plot b) GB3OVRLP overlaps chart Hannu to create new screen plot Hannu to provide new AA3SCAMN has small area in top left which screen shot should be removed 3.7.4.b It is not the only case of overlapping between IHO True. No Action test datasets . For example there are some Some of the cells overlap. Given examples have a 2m overlapping areas between power up GB5X01SE overlap. Section Seamless ENC coverage” of “2.1.8 “UOC et GB5X02SE cells. Do we have Ed. 4.0.0” allows a 5m overlap, but only the agreed “at to raise an overlap indication for very small adjoining national data limits” which is not the case here. As overlapping areas ? => means for most part of IHO a result, the overlap indication should be shown by the plots ? ECDIS as requested by section Data Overlaps” of “10.1.3 Ed. 4.0.1”. There’s no requirement however to “Preslib show the indication on the chart, so the test plots do not need to be changed to include the indication. Test 3.7.4 b) is sufficient to check the indication. Proposed action: None. 3.7.6 Action te Inaccurate test instruction - Alternative methods Replace Agree specified by IMO are missing Change of display scale by chart scale values and by This test is not based on IHO S-52 but on IMO MSC increments of displayed range values in nautical miles. 232(82) clause 5.7: By It should be possible to change the display scale Change of display scale by chart scale values or by by appropriate steps e.g. by means of either chart increments of displayed range values in nautical miles. scale values or ranges in nautical miles
Our opinion is that the better method is to keep original setup instructions and just replace picture based on the original setup. 3.7.4 b Plot b) GB3OVRLP overlaps chart AA3SCAMN has small area in top left which should be removed Hannu to create new screen plot Hannu to provide new screen shot 3.7.4.b It is not the only case of overlapping between IHO test datasets . For example there are some overlapping areas between power up GB5X01SE et GB5X02SE cells. Do we have to raise an overlap indication for very small overlapping areas ? => means for most part of IHO plots ? True. Some of the cells overlap. Given examples have a 2m overlap. Section “2.1.8 Seamless ENC coverage” of “UOC Ed. 4.0.0” allows a 5m overlap, but only “at the agreed adjoining national data limits” which is not the case here. As a result, the overlap indication should be shown by the ECDIS as requested by section “10.1.3 Data Overlaps” of “Preslib Ed. 4.0.1”. There’s no requirement however to show the indication on the chart, so the test plots do not need to be changed to include the indication. Test 3.7.4 b) is sufficient to check the indication. Proposed action: None. No Action 3.7.6 Action te Inaccurate test instruction - Alternative methods specified by IMO are missing This test is not based on IHO S-52 but on IMO MSC 232(82) clause 5.7: It should be possible to change the display scale by appropriate steps e.g. by means of either chart scale values or ranges in nautical miles Replace Change of display scale by chart scale values and by increments of displayed range values in nautical miles. By Change of display scale by chart scale values or by increments of displayed range values in nautical miles. Agree
S-64_consolidated_comments_20160208.docx