assessment and Offender, victim, and half-sister all treatment, cognitively impaired mental health Plea assessment and Significant level of intellectual treatment, 150 disability hours unpaid community work over 12 months, two-year participation in services specified in justice plan SP case Guilty 3 x sexual 16 months Offender aged 13–14 years at time – 20 penetration with wholly suspended of offending, victim was his eight a child under 12 year old cousin 2 x indecent act Includes representative charges with a under is now 24 years and a PhD ‘Offender 16 student’ accept as accurate, given the age ‘I of [offender] at the time, that he did not think it was such a serious thing to be committing (see his answer to Question 389 in the record of interview), and that such was more a sexual exploratory activity rather than a sexual thing’ SP case Guilty 1 x sexual CCO 2 years Adult offended against nine year old – – 21 penetration with supervision, in his neighbour’s care a child under 12 unpaid work (50 Diagnosis of high functioning autism hours over six Verdins: his disability would place months), him in a vulnerable situation in assessment for a prison, likely to suffer hardship that sex offenders others without the disability would treatment not, specific deterrence can be program achieved through terms of a CCO SP case Not 1 x sexual YJC detention 2 Offender had just turned 18 – 22 guilty penetration with years victim was his seven year old cousin a under 12 Previous uncharged acts committed by the offender when he was under 18 years Offender was aged 19 at sentence The guilty verdict will have impact on his ‘significant’ employment and future career hopes As a young offender, emphasis is on rehabilitation SP case Guilty 3 x indecent act 7 months – Offender aged 14–16 victim 26 with a child under wholly suspended was his cousin aged nine to eleven 16 years Offender was aged 33 at sentence
assessment and treatment, mental health assessment and treatment, 150 hours unpaid community work over 12 months, two-year participation in services specified in justice plan Offender, victim, and half-sister all cognitively impaired Plea Significant level of intellectual disability SP case 20 Guilty 3 x sexual penetration with a child under 12 2 x indecent act with a under 16 16 months – wholly suspended Offender aged 13–14 years at time of offending, victim was his eight year old cousin Includes representative charges ‘Offender is now 24 years and a PhD student’ ‘I accept as accurate, given the age of [offender] at the time, that he did not think it was such a serious thing to be committing (see his answer to Question 389 in the record of interview), and that such was more a sexual exploratory activity rather than a sexual thing’ SP case 21 Guilty 1 x sexual penetration with a child under 12 CCO – 2 years – supervision, unpaid work (50 hours over six months), assessment for a sex offenders treatment program Adult offended against nine year old in his neighbour’s care Diagnosis of high functioning autism Verdins: his disability would place him in a vulnerable situation in prison, likely to suffer hardship that others without the disability would not, specific deterrence can be achieved through terms of a CCO SP case 22 Not guilty 1 x sexual penetration with a under 12 YJC detention – 2 years Offender had just turned 18 victim was his seven year old cousin Previous uncharged acts committed by the offender when he was under 18 years Offender was aged 19 at sentence The guilty verdict will have ‘significant’ impact on his employment and future career hopes As a young offender, emphasis is on rehabilitation SP case 26 Guilty 3 x indecent act with a child under 16 7 months – wholly suspended Offender aged 14–16 victim was his cousin aged nine to eleven years Offender was aged 33 at sentence
Sentencing%20of%20Offenders%20Sexual%20Penetration%20with%20a%20Child%20under%2012_0.docx