Practice not in Place Established Practice 0 1 2 3 4 Data are reviewed prior to One component is in place. Two components are in place. Three components are in place. All components are in place. developing the Implementation Plan. Action Components: Conduct and analyze results of the Self and related tools: 1. Learning Supports review (Outcome 2 - see Appendix A), 2. Curriculum Alignment review (Outcome 4), 3. Professional Development review (Outcome 5), 4. Instruction/Assessment review (Outcome 6) Additional personnel, stakeholder and/or student-level data are reviewed to determine current status of the district/school. The Implementation Plan is clearly and specifically based on the Self Study and additional data. The information and training needs of new staff and new families are addressed as needed. The Implementation Plan describes how data will be reviewed at least annually as well as how these data are aligned/embedded with the district/school continuous improvement schedule. The Implementation Plan addresses staff turnover/new enrollment so that new personnel, families/students understand the school’s plan to implement the Iowa Core Curriculum. Possible Evidence: A: Completion of the Self Study and completion of all related reviews. B: Documentation of additional data identified that are used to develop and annually review progress of the implementation of the Iowa Core Curriculum. C-D: Data review plan E: Turnover/new enrollment plan Outcome 3: A continuous improvement process to improve teaching and learning is used at the district and school level. Target 3.b: Data used to monitor progress of Iowa Core Curriculum implementation over time. Action Team uses Self Study annual results to monitor progress of Iowa Core Curriculum implementation over time. Guiding Questions: What is the schedule for reviewing and analyzing data to inform next steps? How will the district/school ensure that the process for reviewing local alignment is continuous? What are the procedures and routines that will sustain implementation? How will information gained from the continuous improvement process facilitate teacher and administrator professional growth (evaluation and professional development)? What considerations need to be taken to address staff and administrator turnover?
Practice not in Place Established Practice 0 1 2 3 4 Data are reviewed prior to developing the Implementation Plan. One component is in place. Two components are in place. Three components are in place. All components are in place. Action Components: Conduct and analyze results of the Self and related tools: 1. Learning Supports review (Outcome 2 - see Appendix A), 2. Curriculum Alignment review (Outcome 4), 3. Professional Development review (Outcome 5), 4. Instruction/Assessment review (Outcome 6) Additional personnel, stakeholder and/or student-level data are reviewed to determine current status of the district/school. The Implementation Plan is clearly and specifically based on the Self Study and additional data. The information and training needs of new staff and new families are addressed as needed. The Implementation Plan describes how data will be reviewed at least annually as well as how these data are aligned/embedded with the district/school continuous improvement schedule. The Implementation Plan addresses staff turnover/new enrollment so that new personnel, families/students understand the school’s plan to implement the Iowa Core Curriculum. Possible Evidence: A: Completion of the Self Study and completion of all related reviews. B: Documentation of additional data identified that are used to develop and annually review progress of the implementation of the Iowa Core Curriculum. C-D: Data review plan E: Turnover/new enrollment plan Outcome 3: A continuous improvement process to improve teaching and learning is used at the district and school level. Target 3.b: Data used to monitor progress of Iowa Core Curriculum implementation over time. Action Team uses Self Study annual results to monitor progress of Iowa Core Curriculum implementation over time. Guiding Questions: What is the schedule for reviewing and analyzing data to inform next steps? How will the district/school ensure that the process for reviewing local alignment is continuous? What are the procedures and routines that will sustain implementation? How will information gained from the continuous improvement process facilitate teacher and administrator professional growth (evaluation and professional development)? What considerations need to be taken to address staff and administrator turnover?
SelfStudyImplementationPlanHandbook11-16-09.docx