1 (No Relevance) 2 (Limited Relevance) 3 (Certain Relevance) 4 (Key Relevance) Quantitative Reasoning Potential for incorporation of Inclusion of numbers and QR No potential for inclusion of could have provided/did provide Incorporation of numbers and numerical evidence and QR numbers or QR. Numbers and QR could have useful detail, enrich QR would have been/was been/was included incidentally. descriptions, present essential to address the main No need for further review. background or establish frames question, theme or issue. of reference. 1 (Beginning) 2 (Developing) 3 (Accomplished) 4 (Exemplary) Actual incorporation of No explicit numerical evidence Explicit numerical evidence or or QR. May include Explicit numerical evidence or numerical evidence and QR QR incorporated randomly. Comparisons presented to references such as QR establishes context and Numbers used contribute provide deeper meaning. QR etc. supports the main question, “many,” “few,” “increased,” minimally to establishing or woven into coherent argument. Numbers included do not theme or issue. supporting context. support thesis. Implementation, interpretation, Use of numerical evidence Use of numerical evidence Use of numerical evidence Use of numerical evidence does and communication of QR supports the argument, but effective throughout the consistently high quality. All not support or is inappropriately supports the main question, some information missing or argument. Claims made claims clearly supported by applied to argument. misused. generally supported by data. data. theme or issue Quantitative data is credible Quantitative data generally Data not always most recent Sources are credible and lacks credibility or is interpreted Quantitative data generally available or incorrectly timely. Methods are clearly incorrectly. Sources not reliable credible and timely. Methods interpreted. Methods described if data collected by or outdated. Methods not adequately described if data inadequately described if data writer. Limitations in the data described if data collected by collected by writer. collected by writer. are noted. writer. Visual representations of data Relevant visual representations Relevant visual representations Visual representations enhance Visual representations missing, mentioned in passing. Titles introduced in text. Images reader’s understanding of data enhance exposition irrelevant or inserted without missing and/or attribution provide additional context for presented. Display the most mention. No attribution provided present solely if incorporated in exposition. Titles and attribution appropriate choice for type of for sources. given. data conveyed.
Quantitative Reasoning 1 (No Relevance) 2 (Limited Relevance) 3 (Certain Relevance) 4 (Key Relevance) Potential for incorporation of numerical evidence and QR No potential for inclusion of numbers or QR. No need for further review. Numbers and QR could have been/was included incidentally. Inclusion of numbers and QR could have provided/did provide useful detail, enrich descriptions, present background or establish frames of reference. Incorporation of numbers and QR would have been/was essential to address the main question, theme or issue. 1 (Beginning) 2 (Developing) 3 (Accomplished) 4 (Exemplary) Actual incorporation of numerical evidence and QR No explicit numerical evidence or QR. May include references such as “many,” “few,” “increased,” etc. Numbers included do not support thesis. Explicit numerical evidence or QR incorporated randomly. Numbers used contribute minimally to establishing or supporting context. Explicit numerical evidence or QR establishes context and supports the main question, theme or issue. Comparisons presented to provide deeper meaning. QR woven into coherent argument. Implementation, interpretation, and communication of QR supports the main question, theme or issue Use of numerical evidence does not support or is inappropriately applied to argument. Use of numerical evidence supports the argument, but some information missing or misused. Use of numerical evidence effective throughout the argument. Claims made generally supported by data. Use of numerical evidence consistently high quality. All claims clearly supported by data. Quantitative data is credible Quantitative data generally lacks credibility or is interpreted incorrectly. Sources not reliable or outdated. Methods not described if data collected by writer. Data not always most recent available or incorrectly interpreted. Methods inadequately described if data collected by writer. Quantitative data generally credible and timely. Methods adequately described if data collected by writer. Sources are credible and timely. Methods are clearly described if data collected by writer. Limitations in the data are noted. Visual representations of data enhance exposition Visual representations missing, irrelevant or inserted without mention. No attribution provided for sources. Relevant visual representations mentioned in passing. Titles missing and/or attribution present solely if incorporated in Relevant visual representations introduced in text. Images provide additional context for exposition. Titles and attribution given. Visual representations enhance reader’s understanding of data presented. Display the most appropriate choice for type of data conveyed.
SOU_Senior_Writing_Assessment_Report.docx