APSC-100 (2010 -2011) MEA1: Mersey Venture Elevator Failure 1 2 3 4 Mark (not demonstrated) (marginal) (meets expectations) (outstanding) (/4) Information Information not Some important Identifies and Meets expectations plus: summary identified properly, no information or biases unknown information, information, or not identified, or uncertainties, and biases. Includes information from information copied from trivial/incorrect authoritative sources to 3.02-FY1: Identify assignment. information included. inform process, model, problem and conclusions. /4 Proposed process No or inadequate Process identified Creates justified process Meets expectations plus: process misses some important for solving problem, 3.02-FY2: Create factors; some suppored by information. Comprehensive process process assumptions left model; comparison with unidentified or other possible unjustified. approaches. /4 No analysis, or Model selected, some Selects and applies Meets expectations plus: model/analysis selected errors in analysis or appropriate quantitative is inappropriate inappropriate model and MATLAB analysis Authoritative research 3.02-FY3: Select assumptions. to solve problems, using used to defend model reasonable approximations assumptions and and assumptions. approximations made /4 Model results and No evaluation of Superficial evaluation of Evaluates validity of results expectations plus: conclusions solution. solution and model for error, uncertainty Evaluates conclusions and 3.02-FY4: Evalute presents potential solution improvements. /4 No or trivial Some important Makes supported Recommendations Meets expectations plus: recommendations recommendations and recommendations to 3.10-FY3: Describes implications missed. prevent future failures; Information, model, and ethical issues describes implications to conclusions used to make stakeholders. recommendations supported by authoritative information. /4
APSC-100 (2010 -2011) MEA1: Mersey Venture Elevator Failure 1 (not demonstrated) 2 (marginal) 3 (meets expectations) 4 (outstanding) Mark (/4) Information summary 3.02-FY1: Identify problem Information not identified properly, no information, or information copied from assignment. Some important information or biases not identified, or trivial/incorrect information included. Identifies and unknown information, uncertainties, and biases. Meets expectations plus: Includes information from authoritative sources to inform process, model, and conclusions. /4 Proposed process 3.02-FY2: Create process No or inadequate process Process identified misses some important factors; some assumptions left unidentified or unjustified. Creates justified process for solving problem, suppored by information. Meets expectations plus: Comprehensive process model; comparison with other possible approaches. /4 3.02-FY3: Select model No analysis, or model/analysis selected is inappropriate Model selected, some errors in analysis or inappropriate assumptions. Selects and applies appropriate quantitative model and MATLAB analysis to solve problems, using reasonable approximations and assumptions. Meets expectations plus: Authoritative research used to defend assumptions and approximations made /4 Model results and conclusions 3.02-FY4: Evalute solution No evaluation of solution. Superficial evaluation of solution Evaluates validity of results and model for error, uncertainty expectations plus: Evaluates conclusions and presents potential improvements. /4 Recommendations 3.10-FY3: Describes ethical issues No or trivial recommendations Some important recommendations and implications missed. Makes supported recommendations to prevent future failures; describes implications to stakeholders. Meets expectations plus: Information, model, and conclusions used to make recommendations supported by authoritative information. /4
Sample_CEAB_Section3.0_QUEENS_GEOLOGICAL_ENGINEERING_2011.docx