2. End-of-Semester Field Practicum Assessment Benchmark or higher – “3” 5 4 3 2 1 NO NA Recognize, critique, & utilize personal values in a way 9 6 that allows professional values to guide practice Make ethical decisions by applying standards of the 8 7 NASW Code of Ethics, etc. Embrace ambiguity and engage the complexity in 11 4 resolving ethical conflicts Apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled 11 4 decisions 3. Curricular Modification None – Competency 3: critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments 1. Touchstone During-Semester Assessment Practice Course Teaching Assessment Assessment Curricular Behavior Strategy Tool Finding Modification Distinguish SWK 311 Students read Exam 1, Benchmark Benchmark sources of Social Neuman’s question #1 grade or achieved “C” knowledge Research chpt. 1 & higher from No curricular Methods lecture on 85% of modification types & students sources of Outcome 22 knowledge of 25 (88%) students met benchmark Mutual Aid Analyze SWK 302 Students read Group (MAG) Benchmark Benchmark – practice Practice with & discuss in Reflection 8 out of 10 achieved models Groups & class models paper points or No curricular Organizations of higher from modification assessment 80% of students Outcome 18 of 21 (89%) met benchmark
2. End-of-Semester Field Practicum Assessment – Benchmark “3” or higher 5 4 3 2 1 NO NA Recognize, critique, & utilize personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice 9 6 Make ethical decisions by applying standards of the NASW Code of Ethics, etc. 8 7 Embrace ambiguity and engage the complexity in resolving ethical conflicts 11 4 Apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions 11 4 3. Curricular Modification – None Competency 3: critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments 1. Touchstone During-Semester Assessment Practice Course Teaching Assessment Assessment Curricular Behavior Strategy Tool Finding Modification Distinguish sources of knowledge Analyze practice models SWK 311 Social Research Methods SWK 302 – Practice with Groups & Organizations Students read Neuman’s chpt. 1 & lecture on types & sources of knowledge Students read & discuss in class models of assessment Exam 1, question #1 Mutual Aid Group (MAG) Reflection paper Benchmark “C” grade or higher from 85% of students Outcome 22 of 25 (88%) students met benchmark Benchmark 8 out of 10 points or higher from 80% of students Outcome 18 of 21 (89%) met benchmark Benchmark achieved No curricular modification Benchmark achieved No curricular modification
Spring%202015%20program%20Assessment%20-%20Gordon%20College%20-%20Baccaluareate%20Program1.docx