Tech Eng registration details without the (770101) Complainant’s knowledge which allowed him to secure a tender with the Free State Department of Education. 26. J Di Mambro It is alleged that the (2014/01/20 - 01) That a Terms letter against R L Respondent undertook the was issued to the design and supervision of a complainant informing Pr residential apartment complex him that failure to Tech Eng during 2003/2004. It is further respond timeously (200170125) alleged that the Respondent would result in the case failed to adhere to acceptable being dismissed. standards regarding the adequacy, quality and suitability of a large sub-surface channel which crosses the site diagonally below the residential apartment complex. 27. J J van Niekerk It is alleged that the (2014/02/27 11) That there was – against S P Respondents were involved in insufficient evidence of 28. Cilliers Pr Eng the development of a complex improper conduct. 29. (2014/02/27 12) – (980363), W in Bloemfontein. It is further Kruger Pr Tech alleged that building plans for (2014/02/27 13) – Eng the complex were not approved (200570100) and building plans were not and J T submitted for a septic tank at Pidgeon Pr the back of the complex which Eng (780227) is running into the Renoster River. 30. G Rossouw The Respondent was appointed (2014/03/14 - 15) I was found there was against C F to do the structural design and prima facie evidence of Joubert Pr Eng erection supervision of a improper conduct. (800192) building in Magaliesburg. It is
Tech Eng (770101) registration details without the Complainant’s knowledge which allowed him to secure a tender with the Free State Department of Education. 26. J Di Mambro against R L Pr Tech Eng (200170125) It is alleged that the Respondent undertook the design and supervision of a residential apartment complex during 2003/2004. It is further alleged that the Respondent failed to adhere to acceptable standards regarding the adequacy, quality and suitability of a large sub-surface channel which crosses the site diagonally below the residential apartment complex. (2014/01/20 - 01) That a Terms letter was issued to the complainant informing him that failure to respond timeously would result in the case being dismissed. 27. J J van Niekerk against S P Cilliers Pr Eng (980363), W Kruger Pr Tech Eng (200570100) and J T Pidgeon Pr Eng (780227) It is alleged that the Respondents were involved in the development of a complex in Bloemfontein. It is further alleged that building plans for the complex were not approved and building plans were not submitted for a septic tank at the back of the complex which is running into the Renoster River. (2014/02/27 – 11) That there was insufficient evidence of improper conduct. 28. 29. (2014/02/27 – 12) (2014/02/27 – 13) 30. G Rossouw against C F Joubert Pr Eng (800192) The Respondent was appointed to do the structural design and erection supervision of a building in Magaliesburg. It is (2014/03/14 - 15) I was found there was prima facie evidence of improper conduct.
RNW1776-161005.docx