Data extraction form Greater Granville Regeneration Strategy Title of paper: Study details Population and Plan details and Outcomes Results Notes setting method of appraisal assessed* Greater Granville Health impacts of the Authors Country: Plan: Outcomes measured: Limitations identified Stevenson, A., Australia regeneration strategy a) Process outcomes: regeneration strategy by author(s): Banswell, K. and Pink, (i) Health outcomes have been identified by considered: Y the HIA R. (ii) Health Setting urban Limitations identified recommendations Method of appraisal: Outcomes: by review team: incorporated in proposal: HIA of Year: Y Population: recommendations 2007 (iii) Evidence of being Greater Granville’s changes to new bus Evidence gaps &/or implemented: unclear residents, 1500 tenants timetables to meet recommendations for (iv) Post-development including 300 needs future research: evaluation: NR Citation: Aboriginals with NSW Not sure if details of the Vol. 18 (9-10), NSW b) Specific outcomes: department o housing outcomes have been Public Health Bulletin Equity: Aboriginals (i) Physical activity: Y to see if HIA can be implemented (ii) Mental wellbeing: Y used as a tool for (iii) Air / noise quality etc: broader policy Future evaluation N/R applications at the should consider the full Aim of study: (iv) Unintentional injury: development phase extent of the HIA Description of the N/R of housing outcomes relative to the impact of the Greater (v) Other health: Y regeneration resource investment. Granville Regeneration Specify: access to partnership Source of funding: Strategy’s HIA: services, urban design agreement with key N/R and housing: availability identification of the stakeholders to and control over housing positive and negative progress health impacts c) Knowledge outcome: implementation of Planners health HIA knowledge or skills: N/R recommendations Study design: policy d) outcome: N/R drivers that WILL Specify:
Data extraction form Title of paper: Greater Granville Regeneration Strategy Study details Population and setting Plan details and method of appraisal Outcomes assessed* Results Notes Authors Stevenson, A., Banswell, K. and Pink, R. Year: 2007 Citation: Vol. 18 (9-10), NSW Public Health Bulletin Aim of study: Description of the impact of the Greater Granville Regeneration Strategy’s HIA: identification of the positive and negative health impacts Study design: Country: Australia Setting urban Population: Greater Granville’s residents, 1500 tenants including 300 Aboriginals Equity: Aboriginals Plan: Greater Granville regeneration strategy Method of appraisal: HIA Outcomes measured: a) Process outcomes: (i) Health outcomes considered: Y (ii) Health recommendations incorporated in proposal: Y (iii) Evidence of being implemented: unclear (iv) Post-development evaluation: NR b) Specific outcomes: (i) Physical activity: Y (ii) Mental wellbeing: Y (iii) Air / noise quality etc: N/R (iv) Unintentional injury: N/R (v) Other health: Y Specify: access to services, urban design and housing: availability and control over housing c) Knowledge outcome: Planners health knowledge or skills: N/R d) outcome: N/R Specify: Health impacts of the regeneration strategy have been identified by the HIA Outcomes: of recommendations changes to new bus timetables to meet needs with NSW department o housing to see if HIA can be used as a tool for broader policy applications at the development phase of housing regeneration partnership agreement with key stakeholders to progress implementation of HIA recommendations policy drivers that WILL Limitations identified by author(s): Limitations identified by review team: Evidence gaps &/or recommendations for future research: Not sure if details of the outcomes have been implemented Future evaluation should consider the full extent of the HIA outcomes relative to the resource investment. Source of funding: N/R
Spatial_planning_for_Health_Review2_Final_1_April_2010_rev_21_April.docx