v. Would the IPPC budget be approved by the CPM plenary session? vi. Would retention of FAO core funding be guaranteed, or would it become dependent on whether additional extra-budgetary funds would be raised? vii. Extra-budgetary funding would the FAO still take a percentage of the funds received? – viii. Subsistence Allowance for meeting participants would this remain linked to FAO – rules? ix. Would use of FAO interpretation and translation services be obligatory or could external contractors be used? x. Plenary meetings would these continue to be governed by FAO rules, e.g. on requiring – delegates to have credentials? xi. Reporting of progress, e.g. on Impact Areas, to other FAO bodies would this remain – an obligation? Timing The report should be completed by 1st October 2011 to allow consideration by the CPM Bureau meeting and the SPTA prior to finalization for presentation to the CPM meeting in March 2012.
v. Would the IPPC budget be approved by the CPM plenary session? vi. Would retention of FAO core funding be guaranteed, or would it become dependent on whether additional extra-budgetary funds would be raised? vii. Extra-budgetary funding – would the FAO still take a percentage of the funds received? viii. Subsistence Allowance for meeting participants – would this remain linked to FAO rules? ix. Would use of FAO interpretation and translation services be obligatory or could external contractors be used? x. Plenary meetings – would these continue to be governed by FAO rules, e.g. on requiring delegates to have credentials? xi. Reporting of progress, e.g. on Impact Areas, to other FAO bodies – would this remain an obligation? Timing The report should be completed by 1st October 2011 to allow consideration by the CPM Bureau meeting and the SPTA prior to finalization for presentation to the CPM meeting in March 2012.
2011_SPTA_19_Article_XIV_2011-10.docx