The EIR of the associated project stated that main adverse impact associated with this “The be the increase in motor vehicle congestion on weekends and project is stated to holidays.” The waterfront project is many greater than this project. City of Redondo agreed with the impact of the Air resource board, stating that comments of the “The Air Resources Board is a legitimate one. Clearly a project that envisions a commercial- recreation center can be expected to have secondary effects on air quality as a result of increased automotive traffic and use.” A great opportunity of the duo” “Dynamic The AES power plant location and waterfront represent a great opportunity, once never thought possible. Now, this is possible. The AES power plant site represents a large amount of potential commercial, residential and office development. Constraining such a large amount of development into such a small part of the waterfront is thinking that was only available due to the fact that the power plant would never be demolished. This is no longer the case. The intent of the CARE act was to include full development of the power plant location, working harmoniously together with the waterfront. Martin F. Holmes Craig Nils Nehrenheim 6 December 2016
The EIR of the associated project stated that “The main adverse impact associated with this project is stated to be the increase in motor vehicle congestion on weekends and holidays.” The waterfront project is many greater than this project. City of Redondo agreed with the impact of the Air resource board, stating that “The comments of the Air Resources Board is a legitimate one. Clearly a project that envisions a commercial- recreation center can be expected to have secondary effects on air quality as a result of increased automotive traffic and use.” A great opportunity of the “Dynamic duo” The AES power plant location and waterfront represent a great opportunity, once never thought possible. Now, this is possible. The AES power plant site represents a large amount of potential commercial, residential and office development. Constraining such a large amount of development into such a small part of the waterfront is thinking that was only available due to the fact that the power plant would never be demolished. This is no longer the case. The intent of the CARE act was to include full development of the power plant location, working harmoniously together with the waterfront. Martin F. Holmes Craig Nils Nehrenheim 6 December 2016
ROW-Rebuttal-to-City-Impact-Report.docx