Direct workplace observation (WO) (screening clinics): skills assessment checklist Candidate’s name: Date: Assessment linkage to competency standard: 6.3-4, 15.1–5 (ED review), 17.1, 17.3 (spinal), 18.1–3 (limb) Within each workplace observation not all performance criteria may be appropriate to be assessed. Three clinical tests per peripheral region may be chosen to be demonstrated. Once all performance criteria has been assessed as independent no further workplace observations will be required. Assessor’s name and designation: BONDY RATING SCALE label Standard of procedure Quality of performance Level of assistance required Independent (I) Safe Achieved intended outcome Proficient No supporting cues required Accurate Behaviour is appropriate to context Confident Expedient Safe Achieved intended outcome Proficient Occasional supportive cues Supervised (S) Accurate Behaviour is appropriate to context Confident Reasonably expedient Assisted (A) Safe Achieved most objectives for intended outcome Proficient throughout most of the Frequent verbal and occasional physical Accurate Behaviour generally appropriate to context performance when assisted directives in addition to supportive cues Marginal (M) Safe only with guidance Incomplete achievement of intended outcome Unskilled Continuous verbal and frequent physical Not completely accurate Inefficient directive cues Dependent (D) Unsafe Unable to demonstrate behaviour Unskilled Continuous verbal and physical directive Lack of insight into behaviour appropriate to context Unable to demonstrate cues behaviour/procedure X Not observed Reference: K N 1983, definitions for rating scales and clinical evaluation’, Journal of Nursing Education, 22(9):376–381. ‘Criterion-referenced Performance rating scale
Direct workplace observation (WO) (screening clinics): skills assessment checklist Candidate’s name: Date: Assessment linkage to competency standard: 6.3-4, 15.1–5 (ED review), 17.1, 17.3 (spinal), 18.1–3 (limb) Within each workplace observation not all performance criteria may be appropriate to be assessed. Three clinical tests per peripheral region may be chosen to be demonstrated. Once all performance criteria has been assessed as independent no further workplace observations will be required. Assessor’s name and designation: BONDY RATING SCALE label Standard of procedure Quality of performance Level of assistance required Independent (I) Safe Accurate Achieved intended outcome Behaviour is appropriate to context Proficient Confident Expedient No supporting cues required Supervised (S) Safe Accurate Achieved intended outcome Behaviour is appropriate to context Proficient Confident Reasonably expedient Occasional supportive cues Assisted (A) Safe Accurate Achieved most objectives for intended outcome Behaviour generally appropriate to context Proficient throughout most of the performance when assisted Frequent verbal and occasional physical directives in addition to supportive cues Marginal (M) Safe only with guidance Not completely accurate Incomplete achievement of intended outcome Unskilled Inefficient Continuous verbal and frequent physical directive cues Dependent (D) Unsafe Unable to demonstrate behaviour Lack of insight into behaviour appropriate to context Unskilled Unable to demonstrate behaviour/procedure Continuous verbal and physical directive cues X Not observed Reference: K N 1983, ‘Criterion-referenced definitions for rating scales and clinical evaluation’, Journal of Nursing Education, 22(9):376–381. Performance rating scale
screening-workbook.docx