Permit RBLC Facility Issuance BACT ID Date Operation within mfg NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 0.0075 lb/MMBTU Operation within mfg NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 0.037 lb/MMBTU Operation within mfg NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 specs, 0.848 lb/MMBTU Operation within mfg NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 specs, 0.074 lb/MMBTU Good combustion NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 practices, gas fuel, 0.0184 lb/MMBTU Good combustion NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 practices, gas fuel, 0.0214 lb/MMBTU Good combustion NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 practices, gas fuel, 0.0362 lb/MMBTU Good combustion NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 practices, gas fuel, 0.037 lb/MMBTU Good combustion NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 practices, gas fuel, 0.038 lb/MMBTU Good combustion NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 practices, gas fuel, 0.0148 lb/MMBTU Good combustion NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 practices, gas fuel, 0.035 lb/MMBTU South Good combustion, SC-0091 Columbia Energy 7/00/03 Carolina fuel, 0.06 lb/MMBTU Step 1. Identify Available Control Technologies The application identified two control technologies: Good combustion practices Catalytic oxidation While secondary non-catalytic oxidation could have been included in the listing, it would have been eliminated at the step of technical feasibility. The two listed options illustrate CO control adequately, either by preventing formation (good combustion practices) or by removal (catalytic
RBLC ID Facility Permit Issuance Date BACT NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg 0.0075 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg 0.037 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg specs, 0.848 lb/MMBTU NV-0049 Harrah’s Operating Co. Nevada 8/20/09 Operation within mfg specs, 0.074 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.0184 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.0214 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.0362 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.037 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.038 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.0148 lb/MMBTU NV-0050 MGM Mirage Nevada 11/30/09 Good combustion practices, gas fuel, 0.035 lb/MMBTU SC-0091 Columbia Energy South Carolina 7/00/03 Good combustion, fuel, 0.06 lb/MMBTU Step 1. Identify Available Control Technologies The application identified two control technologies: Good combustion practices Catalytic oxidation While secondary non-catalytic oxidation could have been included in the listing, it would have been eliminated at the step of technical feasibility. The two listed options illustrate CO control adequately, either by preventing formation (good combustion practices) or by removal (catalytic
2011441-c2p.docx