strategies determined during this closing the loop discussion are implemented during the next academic year. All data reports created by the College of Education are housed on a secure website which is accessible to all faculty within the College of Education. Identify the percentage of students assessed that should be able to demonstrate Performance Outcome: proficiency in this student learning outcome and the level of proficiency expected. Example: 80% of the students assessed will achieve a score of or higher on the Oral Presentation Scoring “acceptable” a copy of the scoring rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, Rubric. (Note: is to be submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive. The program expects 80% of MAT students to receive course grades of (Target scores of 75-68 or ‘A’ ‘B’ (Acceptable/Proficient scores of 67-61 based on course instructor checklist ratings and presentation rubric. The program expects 80% of its candidates to score or better (proficient/accomplished) on the EE1 ‘2’ (Data-based Decision (DBD) Project rubric). 2011Assessment Data 2012 Assessment Data ON CAMPUS CANDIDATES SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT Program Semester Spring 2011 Summer Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer Fall 2012 2011 2012 Count 16 0 8 5 7 1 SPED 7113 Single Subject 100% 100% 90% 100% Research Proposal 98% Presentation Count 5 100% SPED 6691: DBD Element 1: Teacher Leadership ONLINE CANDIDATES SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT Program Semester Spring 2011 Summer Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer Fall 2012 2011 2012 Count 0 3 0 17 0 SPED 7113 Single Online course 90% 100% Subject Research Fall & Spring Proposal Presentation Data not Count 0 4 Will begin in Fall 100% SPED 6691: DBD 2012 Element 1: Teacher Leadership Plans for 2013-14: Based upon the 2012 assessment data included in this annual report, what changes/improvements will the program implement during the next academic year to improve performance on this student learning outcome? Based on program review of the 2011-2012 data all performance outcomes have been met for SLO 4. Candidates in the MAT in Special Education achieved above 80% on all performance criteria. No changes are needed to the program measures at this time. Assessment Lead’s Comments on Student Learning Outcome 3:
strategies determined during this closing the loop discussion are implemented during the next academic year. All data reports created by the College of Education are housed on a secure website which is accessible to all faculty within the College of Education. Performance Outcome: Identify the percentage of students assessed that should be able to demonstrate proficiency in this student learning outcome and the level of proficiency expected. Example: 80% of the students assessed will achieve a score of “acceptable” or higher on the Oral Presentation Scoring Rubric. (Note: a copy of the scoring rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, is to be submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive. The program expects 80% of MAT students to receive course grades of ‘A’ (Target scores of 75-68 or ‘B’ (Acceptable/Proficient scores of 67-61 based on course instructor checklist ratings and presentation rubric. The program expects 80% of its candidates to score ‘2’ or better (proficient/accomplished) on the EE1 (Data-based Decision (DBD) Project rubric). 2011Assessment Data 2012 Assessment Data ON CAMPUS CANDIDATES Program SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT Semester Spring 2011 Summer 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer 2012 Fall 2012 Count 16 0 8 5 7 1 SPED 7113 Single Subject Research Proposal Presentation 98% 100% 100% 90% 100% Count 5 SPED 6691: DBD Element 1: Teacher Leadership 100% ONLINE CANDIDATES Program SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT SPED MAT Semester Spring 2011 Summer 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer 2012 Fall 2012 Count 0 3 0 17 0 SPED 7113 Single Subject Research Proposal Presentation Online course Fall & Spring Data not 90% 100% Count 0 4 SPED 6691: DBD Element 1: Teacher Leadership Will begin in Fall 2012 100% Plans for 2013-14: Based upon the 2012 assessment data included in this annual report, what changes/improvements will the program implement during the next academic year to improve performance on this student learning outcome? Based on program review of the 2011-2012 data all performance outcomes have been met for SLO 4. Candidates in the MAT in Special Education achieved above 80% on all performance criteria. No changes are needed to the program measures at this time. Assessment Lead’s Comments on Student Learning Outcome 3:
2012-13%20Student%20Learning%20Outcomes%20SPED%20MAT%20Annual%20Report.docx