National body responsible for administering the safety assurance system (options 3 and 4 only) Flexibility and ADSEs responsiveness Commonwealth government State and territory governments and the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator National body responsible for administering the safety assurance system (options 3 and 4 only) Consultation question Has the consultation RIS captured the relevant individuals or groups who may be significantly affected by each of the options? Who else would you include and why? Multi-criteria analysis We use a comparative analysis scale to assign each option a rating against each impact category. Table 6 shows the scale we use to indicate an option’s comparative advantage or disadvantage compared with the baseline (option 1). Comparative analysis scale Very negative Negative impact Neutral Ambiguous / Improvement Large impact uncertain improvement The option would The option would The option would The option could The option would The option likely result in a likely result in likely have a result in an likely result in would likely result in a large decline some (limited or negligible impact improvement or some (limited or large compared with the moderate) decline compared with the decline compared moderate) improvement baseline option compared with the baseline option to the baseline improvement compared with baseline option option compared with the the baseline baseline option option We then test the validity of the outcomes of this assessment, by: examining outcomes against different deployment scenarios assessing the factors that would lead to a different preferred option. A provisionally preferred option is set out in chapter 7. This will be re-assessed on evidence gathered through the consultation process.
National body responsible for administering the safety assurance system (options 3 and 4 only) Flexibility and responsiveness ADSEs Commonwealth government State and territory governments and the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator National body responsible for administering the safety assurance system (options 3 and 4 only) Consultation question Has the consultation RIS captured the relevant individuals or groups who may be significantly affected by each of the options? Who else would you include and why? Multi-criteria analysis We use a comparative analysis scale to assign each option a rating against each impact category. Table 6 shows the scale we use to indicate an option’s comparative advantage or disadvantage compared with the baseline (option 1). Comparative analysis scale Very negative impact Negative impact Neutral Ambiguous / uncertain Improvement Large improvement The option would likely result in a large decline compared with the baseline option The option would likely result in some (limited or moderate) decline compared with the baseline option The option would likely have a negligible impact compared with the baseline option The option could result in an improvement or decline compared to the baseline option The option would likely result in some (limited or moderate) improvement compared with the baseline option The option would likely result in a large improvement compared with the baseline option We then test the validity of the outcomes of this assessment, by: examining outcomes against different deployment scenarios assessing the factors that would lead to a different preferred option. A provisionally preferred option is set out in chapter 7. This will be re-assessed on evidence gathered through the consultation process.
safety_assurance_for_automated_driving_systems.docx