b) Specific issues: research results by same authors). (i) Physical activity: Y (ii) Mental wellbeing: N/R (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Y (iv) Unintentional injury: No evidence (v) Other health: Y Specify: access to open space c) Knowledge outcome: Planners health knowledge or skills: N/R d) outcome: N/R Specify: Country : Germany Plan: draft local Outcomes measured: Consultation still under a) Process outcomes: way at time of writing statutory land use Setting: urban - (i) Health outcomes Health stakeholders plan of Leipzig 2005 considered: Y Leipzig can participate in SEA (ii) Health recommendations but not sure if they did incorporated in plan: Population: 50000 here. Method of unclear inhabitants on 300km2 (iii) Evidence of being appraisal: SEA Authors thinks that implemented: unclear Equity the SEA has (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: influenced unclear - general comment on the fact that SEA refers to monitoring programme. No fair to say” “Probably SEA specific monitoring that the system identified. considerations of health in SEA have an b) Specific issues: impact on final (i) Physical activity: Y decision-making (ii) Mental wellbeing: N/R (iii) Air / noise quality etc: However, impact Y likely to have been (iv) Unintentional injury: No modest (based on evidence (v) Other health: Y
b) Specific issues: (i) Physical activity: Y (ii) Mental wellbeing: N/R (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Y (iv) Unintentional injury: No evidence (v) Other health: Y Specify: access to open space c) Knowledge outcome: Planners health knowledge or skills: N/R d) outcome: N/R Specify: research results by same authors). Country : Germany Setting: urban - Leipzig Population: 50000 inhabitants on 300km2 Equity Plan: draft local statutory land use plan of Leipzig 2005 Method of appraisal: SEA Outcomes measured: a) Process outcomes: (i) Health outcomes considered: Y (ii) Health recommendations incorporated in plan: unclear (iii) Evidence of being implemented: unclear (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: unclear - general comment on the fact that SEA refers to monitoring programme. No SEA specific monitoring system identified. b) Specific issues: (i) Physical activity: Y (ii) Mental wellbeing: N/R (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Y (iv) Unintentional injury: No evidence (v) Other health: Y Consultation still under way at time of writing Health stakeholders can participate in SEA but not sure if they did here. Authors thinks that the SEA has influenced “Probably fair to say” that the considerations of health in SEA have an impact on final decision-making However, impact likely to have been modest (based on
Spatial_planning_for_Health_Review2_Final_1_April_2010_rev_21_April.docx