information were and/or was included uninformative Format of Figures Tables or figures Legends were brief Legends were brief Legends were too Little to no and Tables were well labelled and lack some key and/or labels were brief or absent, tables/figures were and include well details, and/or labels lacking and/or figures were presented written legends were lacking poorly labelled Discussion 5 4 3 2 1 or 0 Interpretation of Clear, concise and Concise and clear Discussion of the Discussion of the Little to no discussion results logical interpretation interpretation of the results is convoluted results is minimal of the research of the results, results, interpretation and fails to clearly ant the interpretation findings suggests next briefly discusses the discuss the rationale only focuses on the investigative steps, rationale for the study for the study with methods/data interpretation extends with respect to the respect to the reliability beyond a discussion broader field, but broader field and of the methods/data focuses primarily on focuses primarily on reliability and the methods/data the methods/data discusses the reliability reliability implication of the results to the broader field, if methodological issues are raised they are discussed in light of their impact on the conclusions Synthesis Findings were Findings were Findings were Findings were Findings were discussed discussed discussed discussed discussed individually individually, and individually, and individually with a individually with with no attempt to synthesized and led moderate attempt to little attempt to
information were included and/or was uninformative Format of Figures and Tables Tables or figures were well labelled and include well written legends Legends were brief and lack some key details, and/or labels were lacking Legends were brief and/or labels were lacking Legends were too brief or absent, and/or figures were poorly labelled Little to no tables/figures were presented Discussion 5 4 3 2 1 or 0 Interpretation of results Clear, concise and logical interpretation of the results, suggests next investigative steps, interpretation extends beyond a discussion of the methods/data reliability and discusses the implication of the results to the broader field, if methodological issues are raised they are discussed in light of their impact on the conclusions Concise and clear interpretation of the results, interpretation briefly discusses the rationale for the study with respect to the broader field, but focuses primarily on the methods/data reliability Discussion of the results is convoluted and fails to clearly discuss the rationale for the study with respect to the broader field and focuses primarily on the methods/data reliability Discussion of the results is minimal ant the interpretation only focuses on the methods/data reliability Little to no discussion of the research findings Synthesis Findings were discussed individually, and synthesized and led Findings were discussed individually, and Findings were discussed individually with a moderate attempt to Findings were discussed individually with little attempt to Findings were discussed individually with no attempt to
Rubrics%20for%20the%20Stream%20Study%20Assignments.docx