But other tests related to updates do not include plot(s) showing highlight symbols used for update review (2.2.3, 2.2.5 and 2.2.7). The update for this test GB5X01SW ed2 upd1 is very problematic as indicated by the associated “readme.txt” Because of the way that UKHO’s ENC production software works, the update also deletes and a bundle of 273 soundings as well as the 10m contour, the 5-10m depth area, the 10-20m depth area, a harbour area and a meta navigational system of marks The above cause very crowded highlight of update review if all deletion/re-creations are also highlighted. Such a crowded display does not serve end user to see what has been updated. The current picture included in S-64 has much less highlight of update review. Obviously the plot is from a system has analysed the content of the update and removed unwanted deletions/re-creations from the highlight. However the analyse/optimization process is not described in the S-52. Therefore the S-64 test for compliance should not require such a process. On the other hand making such optimization illegal by having a plot containing all deletions/re-creations in the S-64 does not serve end-user. Our conclusion is that in this case the best way forward is to show after the update a neutral plot without highlight for update review.
But other tests related to updates do not include plot(s) showing highlight symbols used for update review (2.2.3, 2.2.5 and 2.2.7). The update for this test GB5X01SW ed2 upd1 is very problematic as indicated by the associated “readme.txt” Because of the way that UKHO’s ENC production software works, the update also deletes and a bundle of 273 soundings as well as the 10m contour, the 5-10m depth area, the 10-20m depth area, a harbour area and a meta navigational system of marks The above cause very crowded highlight of update review if all deletion/re-creations are also highlighted. Such a crowded display does not serve end user to see what has been updated. The current picture included in S-64 has much less highlight of update review. Obviously the plot is from a system has analysed the content of the update and removed unwanted deletions/re-creations from the highlight. However the analyse/optimization process is not described in the S-52. Therefore the S-64 test for compliance should not require such a process. On the other hand making such optimization illegal by having a plot containing all deletions/re-creations in the S-64 does not serve end-user. Our conclusion is that in this case the best way forward is to show after the update a neutral plot without highlight for update review.
S-64_consolidated_comments_20160208.docx