thinking seems thus to demand something entirely different– that one takes the risk of entering into the play of ideas not to control it, or to master them, but to learn how to ideas, how to enable them to enable us to extract from that vague compose with experience relevant contrasts, and to fabulate connections, that may allow for something interesting, something important, something new, to exist. References Abbott, A. (2004). New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Methods of Discovery. Bacon, F. (1860). Boston: Taggard and The Works of Francis Bacon: Vol. VI. Thompson. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). Cambridge: An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Polity Press Bridges-Rhoads, S., Van Cleave, J., & Hughes, H. (2015), ‘Complicating methodological transparency’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2015.1063733 in Education, Camic, C. & Gross, N. (2004). The New Sociology of Ideas. In J. R. Blau (Ed.). The (pp. 236-249). Oxford: Blackwell. Blackwell Companion to Sociology. Deleuze, G. (1994). New York: Columbia University Press. Difference and Repetition. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). London: Verso. What Is Philosophy?. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2011). Introduction. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). (4th ed.). (pp. 1– 20). Thousand Oaks, Handbook of qualitative research CA: Sage Descartes, R. (1996[1654]). Cambridge: Cambridge Meditations on First Philosophy. University Press.
thinking seems thus to demand something entirely different– that one takes the risk of entering into the play of ideas not to control it, or to master them, but to learn how to compose with ideas, how to enable them to enable us to extract from that vague experience relevant contrasts, and to fabulate connections, that may allow for something interesting, something important, something new, to exist. References Abbott, A. (2004). Methods of Discovery. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Bacon, F. (1860). The Works of Francis Bacon: Vol. VI. Boston: Taggard and Thompson. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press Bridges-Rhoads, S., Van Cleave, J., & Hughes, H. (2015), ‘Complicating methodological transparency’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2015.1063733 Camic, C. & Gross, N. (2004). The New Sociology of Ideas. In J. R. Blau (Ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Sociology. (pp. 236-249). Oxford: Blackwell. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What Is Philosophy?. London: Verso. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2011). Introduction. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). (pp. 1– 20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Descartes, R. (1996[1654]). Meditations on First Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Savransky%2C%20How%20it%20feels%20to%20think-%20OK.docx