APPENDIX 13 Continued: ASD Assessment of EBAC response to S22 Notice 2 APPLIED SCIENCE ASSESSMENT - PEER REVIEW Yes No If yes, level recommended: If no, why not: PEER REVIEW high standard advice REQUIRED/RECOMMENDED medium low risk/low complexity (use decision matrix in SOP) low not available Scope: Types: Sense check on thought technical PEER REVIEW REQUEST: process in RA language and style SCOPE AND TYPES science communications strategic alignment PEER REVIEWER(S) Laura-lee Innes PEER REVIEW DETAILS <what was/wasn’t included in scope> DAU OUT FRAME QUALITY OF APPLIED SCIENCE Please find your request in this , and complete it. FEEDBACK Version Date Author Summary of changes 0 Creation David Robinson Creation of form date 1 23/05/2018 Michael Clough Filled in AS parts 2 24/05/2018 Innes AS peer review
APPENDIX 13 Continued: ASD Assessment of EBAC response to S22 Notice 2 APPLIED SCIENCE ASSESSMENT - PEER REVIEW PEER REVIEW REQUIRED/RECOMMENDED (use decision matrix in SOP) Yes If yes, level recommended: high medium low No If no, why not: standard advice low risk/low complexity not available PEER REVIEW REQUEST: SCOPE AND TYPES Scope: Sense check on thought process in RA Types: technical language and style science communications strategic alignment PEER REVIEWER(S) Laura-lee Innes PEER REVIEW DETAILS <what was/wasn’t included in scope> DAU OUT FRAME QUALITY OF APPLIED SCIENCE FEEDBACK Please find your request in this , and complete it. Version Date Author Summary of changes 0 Creation date David Robinson Creation of form 1 23/05/2018 Michael Clough Filled in AS parts 2 24/05/2018 Innes AS peer review
SO1003002_WA-Assessment-Report-EBAC-asbestos-landfill-Final.docx