Angela Valenti (low risk) Summary table Citation Study Population Intervention Outcomes Sample Intervention Compliance to Results & design level measured size duration sodium target location of relevant to (urinary data) research question II Adult males Both groups were pressure 23 9-11 weeks Low sodium diet: Mean difference (supine after et al. (41 59 instructed to 97 +32 mmol/24hr between low sodium – 10 min rest) (1984), parallel years), with consume an energy diet and normal Normal sodium Sweden design hypertension restricted diet low sodium diet diet: 200 + 56 study (DBP: 95 - in sodium. [] mmol/24hr SBP: -8.40mmHg (CI: 105mmHg) 1. provided with 4.27) additional sodium DBP: -4.60mmHg (CI: via salt and -11.31, 2.11) sodium tablets 2. no sodium provided Key features for bias assessment of randomised trials
Angela Valenti (low risk) Summary table Citation & location Study design level of Population Intervention Outcomes measured relevant to research question Sample size Intervention duration Compliance to sodium target (urinary data) Results et al. (1984), Sweden [] parallel design study II Adult males (41 – 59 years), with hypertension (DBP: 95 - 105mmHg) Both groups were instructed to consume an energy restricted diet low in sodium. 1. provided with additional sodium via salt and sodium tablets 2. no sodium provided pressure (supine after 10 min rest) 23 9-11 weeks Low sodium diet: 97 +32 mmol/24hr Normal sodium diet: 200 + 56 mmol/24hr Mean difference between low sodium diet and normal sodium diet SBP: -8.40mmHg (CI: 4.27) DBP: -4.60mmHg (CI: -11.31, 2.11) Key features for bias assessment of randomised trials
Sodium%20Supporting%20Document%201%20%20Systematic%20Literature%20Review.docx