stored in the pit “sharp” Siting of Negative effect Local M Weekly Site Click here to enter Water incinerator, on drainage, inspection text. (usage, placing of erosion, siltation Act (2004) program (using discharges material, attached form ) and risk of removed soil will identify floods) issues that need correction. Interaction with Spreading of Public M Contractor to PM Click here to enter existing waste contaminated Health Act do risk text. on surface or in areas, exposure (2004) assessment excavated of construction (refer to materials. workers to attached form - disease. Health and safety system) if contamination is suspected. Design of Damage to the M 1. Sustainable PM de Triage and environment energy solution Montfort incinerators, because of poor to be part of the training and energy source, Act (2008) design solution. has been handover of Depletion of Consideration chosen facilities source energy for potential to because resources use renewable/ of its low clean, readily fuel available source of Energy energy. (usage, Consideration source, for local ability cost etc) to maintain a solution with a particular in energy source. terms of low running cost as well as easier
stored in the “sharp” pit Water (usage, discharges and risk of floods) Siting of incinerator, placing of material, removed soil Negative effect on drainage, erosion, siltation Local Act (2004) M Weekly inspection program (using attached form ) will identify issues that need correction. Site Click here to enter text. Interaction with existing waste on surface or in excavated materials. Spreading of contaminated areas, exposure of construction workers to disease. Public Health Act (2004) M Contractor to do risk assessment (refer to attached form - Health and safety system) if contamination is suspected. PM Click here to enter text. Energy (usage, source, cost etc) Design of Triage and incinerators, training and handover of facilities Damage to the environment because of poor energy source, Depletion of source energy resources Act (2008) M 1. Sustainable energy solution to be part of the design solution. Consideration for potential to use renewable/ clean, readily available source of energy. Consideration for local ability to maintain a solution with a particular energy source. PM de Montfort has been chosen because of its low fuel in terms of low running cost as well as easier
SFG1911-EA-P153064-Box394869B-PUBLIC-Disclosed-3-7-2016.docx