Related Parties Libraries Abstracting and Indexing Repository Administrators Services May serve as a repository for the Indicate the availability of Make deposited content accessible research done by university Supplemental Materials if the by assigning persistent identifiers, researchers. journal publisher has provided such as a DOI or another unique clear indication they exist. identifier. Include Supplemental Materials Include the formats and file Include DOIs for any journal with journal article interlibrary of Supplemental Material if the articles that link to content in their loan when the journal publisher publisher has provided repository. has provided clear indication identifiable metadata. they exist. Include the publisher-provided Manage bidirectional links DOI or other identifier. between the deposited content and the article. Recommended Business Practices This section will cover a number of different issues concerning Supplemental Materials. These are treated here at a high level, and with a policy perspective in mind. A more detailed discussion of the technical and implementation considerations is included in Part B of this document, where consideration will be given to the information and metadata required to ensure that the context, linking, archiving, and preservation recommendations outlined in this section can be achieved. Selecting Supplemental Materials The costs of vetting, delivering, and maintaining Supplemental Materials can be considerable. Consequently, particular care in accepting content is warranted, and the publisher should provide written guidelines for accepting these materials. Careful editorial evaluation according to the Journal’s practices is essential. In all cases, it is helpful to both authors and readers if the Journal sets forth clear expectations that Supplemental Materials be relevant to the article and useful additions to the scholarly record. This section refers to editorial evaluation of manuscripts. Integral Content Best practice is to review any materials deemed essential to the full understanding of the article, but treated as Supplemental Materials for reasons, at the same level as the article. The decision to publish Integral Content separately from the article may occur after the article is accepted; in that case the reviewer has seen the content within the manuscript. However, if it is submitted as a separate file, either at original submission or at request following editorial evaluation, reviewers should receive the full set of article and Integral Content and should be expected to review both at the same level. Ideally, materials should be reviewed at the same level as the article. However, Additional Content Additional Content may be so voluminous that resources simply are not available for full review. In some instances, a reviewer may request these materials to allow a
Related Parties Libraries Abstracting and Indexing Services Repository Administrators May serve as a repository for the research done by university researchers. Indicate the availability of Supplemental Materials if the journal publisher has provided clear indication they exist. Make deposited content accessible by assigning persistent identifiers, such as a DOI or another unique identifier. Include Supplemental Materials with journal article interlibrary loan when the journal publisher has provided clear indication they exist. Include the formats and file of Supplemental Material if the publisher has provided identifiable metadata. Include DOIs for any journal articles that link to content in their repository. Include the publisher-provided DOI or other identifier. Manage bidirectional links between the deposited content and the article. Recommended Business Practices This section will cover a number of different issues concerning Supplemental Materials. These are treated here at a high level, and with a policy perspective in mind. A more detailed discussion of the technical and implementation considerations is included in Part B of this document, where consideration will be given to the information and metadata required to ensure that the context, linking, archiving, and preservation recommendations outlined in this section can be achieved. Selecting Supplemental Materials The costs of vetting, delivering, and maintaining Supplemental Materials can be considerable. Consequently, particular care in accepting content is warranted, and the publisher should provide written guidelines for accepting these materials. Careful editorial evaluation according to the Journal’s practices is essential. In all cases, it is helpful to both authors and readers if the Journal sets forth clear expectations that Supplemental Materials be relevant to the article and useful additions to the scholarly record. This section refers to editorial evaluation of manuscripts. Integral Content Best practice is to review any materials deemed essential to the full understanding of the article, but treated as Supplemental Materials for reasons, at the same level as the article. The decision to publish Integral Content separately from the article may occur after the article is accepted; in that case the reviewer has seen the content within the manuscript. However, if it is submitted as a separate file, either at original submission or at request following editorial evaluation, reviewers should receive the full set of article and Integral Content and should be expected to review both at the same level. Additional Content Ideally, materials should be reviewed at the same level as the article. However, Additional Content may be so voluminous that resources simply are not available for full review. In some instances, a reviewer may request these materials to allow a
RP-15-201x%20Suppl_BWG_final_draft-rev.docx