New Faculty Annually completed Report of Report to Orientation completion AVP-Acad. Program executed Affairs Affairs Percentage of Annually AVP 10% better Counts of Data – faculty who Acad. annually faculty who uploaded to participate in unit Affairs than participate in Data programs/activities baseline specific Warehouse after year 1 programs/ (AY activ.’s offered Percentage of End of each AVP- 75% of Rating counts Qualtrics faculty who rate semester Acad. participants in semester survey data participation in Affairs rate surveys of uploaded to unit program as program Data programs/activities good or participants. Warehouse as good - excellent excellent Percentage of Annually AVP- 75% of Counts of Qualtrics dept. chairs who Acad. department ratings in survey data indicate positive or Affairs chairs rate annual survey uploaded to strongly positive particip. by of Data benefit through their department Warehouse their faculty faculty chairs. members’ particip. above “no in unit program(s) impact” Percentage of Bi-annually 10% better Counts of Sedona faculty who annually faculty who integrate a Affairs than include teaching baseline teaching philosophy with after year 1 philos. in their biannual (AY Sedona review materials. uploads. Percentage of End of each 10% better Counts of Testing students who rate semester annually ratings Office teaching Affairs than (inst. & database performance as baseline at college level good or excellent. Fall 2013 aggregation). end. Strategy 3: Implement a comprehensive public relations program to promote student success in all forms of student communication and University academic recognition. Action Steps Person Time line for responsible Step # Action Step Description implementation for outcomes 1 Conduct a comprehensive review of existing student Spring 2013 AVP for communication efforts, systems, and content.
New Faculty Orientation Program executed Annually Affairs completed Report of completion Report to AVP-Acad. Affairs Percentage of faculty who participate in unit programs/activities Annually AVP – Acad. Affairs 10% better annually than baseline after year 1 (AY Counts of faculty who participate in specific programs/ activ.’s offered Data uploaded to Data Warehouse Percentage of faculty who rate participation in unit programs/activities as good - excellent End of each semester AVP- Acad. Affairs 75% of participants rate program as good or excellent Rating counts in semester surveys of program participants. Qualtrics survey data uploaded to Data Warehouse Percentage of dept. chairs who indicate positive or strongly positive benefit through their faculty members’ particip. in unit program(s) Annually AVP- Acad. Affairs 75% of department chairs rate particip. by their faculty above “no impact” Counts of ratings in annual survey of department chairs. Qualtrics survey data uploaded to Data Warehouse Percentage of faculty who integrate a teaching philosophy with their biannual review materials. Bi-annually Affairs 10% better annually than baseline after year 1 (AY Counts of faculty who include teaching philos. in Sedona uploads. Sedona Percentage of students who rate teaching performance as good or excellent. End of each semester Affairs 10% better annually than baseline at Fall 2013 end. Counts of ratings (inst. & college level aggregation). Testing Office database Strategy 3: Implement a comprehensive public relations program to promote student success in all forms of student communication and University academic recognition. Action Steps Step # Action Step Description Time line for implementation Person responsible for outcomes 1 Conduct a comprehensive review of existing student communication efforts, systems, and content. Spring 2013 AVP for
SEMPlan-January2013.docx