Historical Contract Non-Performance Criteria Joint Venture Documentation All Each One Submission Single Entity Members No. Subject Requirement Member Member Requirements Requirements Combined Non-performance of a contract did not 2.1 History of Form CON-2 occur as a result of contractor’s default Non- Must meet Must meet Must meet N/A since 1st January [insert year]. requirement requirements requirement Contracts 2.2 Suspension Not under suspension based on execution Application Based on of a Proposal Securing Declaration Submission Letter Execution of pursuant to ITA 4.10. Proposal Must meet Must meet Must meet N/A Securing requirement requirement requirement Declaration by the Employer 2.3 Pending Applicant’s financial position and Form CON 2 – prospective long term profitability still Litigation sound according to criteria established in Must meet Must meet N/A N/A 3.1 below and assuming that all pending requirement requirement litigation will be resolved against the Applicant 2.4 Litigation No consistent history of court/arbitral Form CON 2 – Must meet Must meet Must meet award decisions against the Applicant N/A History requirement requirement requirement since 1st January [insert year] Financial Situation and Performance
Historical Contract Non-Performance Criteria Single Entity Requirements Joint Venture Documentation No. Subject Requirement All Members Combined Each Member One Member Submission Requirements 2.1 History of Contracts Non-performance of a contract did not occur as a result of contractor’s default since 1st January [insert year]. Must meet requirement Must meet requirements Must meet requirement N/A Form CON-2 2.2 Suspension Based on Execution of Proposal Securing Declaration by the Employer Not under suspension based on execution of a Proposal Securing Declaration pursuant to ITA 4.10. Must meet requirement Must meet requirement Must meet requirement N/A Application Submission Letter 2.3 Pending Litigation Applicant’s financial position and prospective long term profitability still sound according to criteria established in 3.1 below and assuming that all pending litigation will be resolved against the Applicant Must meet requirement N/A Must meet requirement N/A Form CON – 2 2.4 Litigation History No consistent history of court/arbitral award decisions against the Applicant since 1st January [insert year] Must meet requirement Must meet requirement Must meet requirement N/A Form CON – 2 Financial Situation and Performance Non-
SPD-Initial-Selection-Document-PLANT-July-2016.docx