proficient level. Typically, In 2012-2013, the SWD:25% SWD:33% achievement gap for SWD proficient proficient these groups meet between students will be reduced by three and five times a week, meeting the AMO target or for 20 to 40 minutes through Safe Harbor. Based on the analysis of student achievement data and Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Process Used to Determine Evaluation Tool reference to Questions,” identify and define Responsible for Monitoring Effectiveness of Strategy “Guiding areas in need of improvement for the following subgroup: 5E. Economically Disadvantaged (ED) Challenges of working with Implementation of a Administration Classroom Walkthrough VSET Observations students not making satisfactory progress in students who do not have literacy system that Domain 3 reading. exposure to high-level emphasizes a unified, Reading Coach Literacy Leadership Team academic vocabulary in their systematic approach to the Meetings Reading Goal #5E: 2012 Current 2013 Expected of Level of homes teaching of vocabulary using In 2012-2013, the Literacy Leadership Team Performance:* Performance:* achievement gap for SWD research-based strategies students will be reduced by SWD:57% SWD:61% meeting the AMO target or proficient proficient through Safe Harbor. Professional Development Each goal has a Professional Development section PD must be based on data and connected to the needs of the school PD must fall within the districts definition of PD Professional Development MUST include Initial training Implementation Follow-up Evaluation Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activities Please note that each strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity. PD Facilitator PD Participants Target (e.g., early release) PD Content/Topic Level/ Person or Position Responsible and/or (e.g., PLC, subject, grade level, and Schedules (e.g., frequency of Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring and/or PLC Focus Subject for Monitoring PLC Leader or school-wide) meetings) PD - When Grades 1 2 Instructional Grade-level PLC Initial training during Classroom visitation / coaching Instructional coaches – Readers Struggle coaches August and September; (WRS) implementation within 30 days; follow-up within 60 days.
proficient level. Typically, these groups meet between three and five times a week, for 20 to 40 minutes In 2012-2013, the achievement gap for SWD students will be reduced by meeting the AMO target or through Safe Harbor. SWD:25% proficient SWD:33% proficient Based on the analysis of student achievement data and reference to “Guiding Questions,” identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following subgroup: Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 5E. Economically Disadvantaged (ED) students not making satisfactory progress in reading. Challenges of working with students who do not have exposure to high-level academic vocabulary in their homes Implementation of a literacy system that emphasizes a unified, systematic approach to the teaching of vocabulary using research-based strategies Administration Reading Coach Literacy Leadership Team Classroom Walkthrough Literacy Leadership Team Meetings VSET Observations Domain 3 Reading Goal #5E: In 2012-2013, the achievement gap for SWD students will be reduced by meeting the AMO target or through Safe Harbor. 2012 Current of Performance:* 2013 Expected Level of Performance:* SWD:57% proficient SWD:61% proficient Professional Development Each goal has a Professional Development section PD must be based on data and connected to the needs of the school PD must fall within the districts definition of PD Professional Development MUST include Initial training Implementation Follow-up Evaluation Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activities Please note that each strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity. PD Content/Topic and/or PLC Focus Level/ Subject PD Facilitator and/or PLC Leader PD Participants (e.g., PLC, subject, grade level, or school-wide) Target (e.g., early release) and Schedules (e.g., frequency of meetings) Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring PD - When Readers Struggle (WRS) Grades 1 – 2 Instructional coaches Grade-level PLC Initial training during August and September; implementation within 30 days; follow-up within 60 days. Classroom visitation / coaching Instructional coaches
2012-2013%20SIP%20Toolkit%20AMO.docx