1. Touchstone During-Semester Assessments Practice Course Teaching Assessment Assessment Curricular Behavior Strategy Tool Finding Modification Personal SWK 301 Readings & Process Benchmark Benchmark – values Theories & lectures on recording & grade or achieved “C” allowing for Practice with the topic of higher from No curricular personal Individuals & values genogram 85% of modification – values Families personal & paper students professional Outcome 20 of 21 students (95%) achieved “C” or better . Apply SWK 311 Neuman’s Assessment Benchmark Benchmark – strategies of Social Basics of of "Do no or achieved “C” ethical Research Social harm," higher on No curricular reasoning to Methods Research: informed examination 1 modification arrive at Qualitative consent, and essay principled and the function question 3 decisions Quantitative of the from 90% of Approaches, Institutional students. chapter 3 & Review Board Outcome 25 on Exam 1, of 27 discussion question 3 students (193%) achieved grade of “C” or higher Embrace SWK 221 Reading of Student Benchmark Benchmark – ambiguity & Power, primary text & journal grade or achieved “C” complexity Prestige & discussion of graded higher on No curricular Poverty ethical journals for modification complexity 85% of students Outcome 17 of 20 (85%) students achieved a grade of “C” or higher
1. Touchstone During-Semester Assessments Practice Course Teaching Assessment Assessment Curricular Behavior Strategy Tool Finding Modification Personal values allowing for personal values . Apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions Embrace ambiguity & complexity SWK 301 – Theories & Practice with Individuals & Families SWK 311 – Social Research Methods SWK 221 – Power, Prestige & Poverty Readings & lectures on the topic of values – personal & professional Neuman’s Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, chapter 3 & discussion Reading of primary text & discussion of ethical complexity Process recording & genogram paper Assessment of "Do no harm," informed consent, and the function of the Institutional Review Board on Exam 1, question 3 Student journal graded Benchmark “C” grade or higher from 85% of students Outcome 20 of 21 students (95%) achieved “C” or better Benchmark “C” or higher on examination 1 essay question 3 from 90% of students. Outcome 25 of 27 students (193%) achieved grade of “C” or higher Benchmark “C” grade or higher on journals for 85% of students Outcome 17 of 20 (85%) students achieved a grade of “C” or higher Benchmark achieved No curricular modification Benchmark achieved No curricular modification Benchmark achieved No curricular modification
Spring%202015%20program%20Assessment%20-%20Gordon%20College%20-%20Baccaluareate%20Program1.docx