a copy of the scoring rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, is to be (Note: submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive and hyperlinked to the Effectiveness Measure above for each student learning outcome.) The program expects 80% of M.Ed. candidates to receive ratings of (Acceptable) or better (Target) ‘2’ ‘3’ on rubric using a 3 point scale. ( Leadership Project) 2011 Assessment Data (Results can be shown by 2012 Assessment Data (Results can be shown year or by semester) by year or by semester) Program CHFD MEd CHFD MEd Semester Spring/Fall 2011 Spring/Fall 2012 9 8 Leadership Project 100% 100% 1. Statement of Goal Leadership Project 100% 100% 5. Self Evaluation of Leadership Leadership Project 100% 100% 6. Mentor Evaluation of Leadership Plans for 2013-2014: Based upon the assessment data included in this annual report, what changes/improvements will the program implement during the next academic year to improve performance on this student learning outcome? Based on review of the previous semester data all performance outcomes were met. Candidates in the M.Ed. Special Education Program achieved above 80% on all performance criteria. It was determined that no changes are needed at this time. Assessment Lead’s Comments on Student Learning Outcome: Student Learning Outcome 5 (knowledge, skill or ability to be assessed) Advanced teacher candidates demonstrate a thorough understanding of assessment through analysis of student, classroom, and school performance data and subsequent data-driven decisions about strategies for teaching and learning so that all students learn. If any changes were made to the Changes to the Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan: assessment plan (which includes the Student Learning Outcome, Effectiveness Measure, Methodology and Performance Outcome) for this student learning outcome since your last report was submitted, briefly summarize the changes made and the rationale for the changes.
(Note: a copy of the scoring rubric, complete with cell descriptors for each level of performance, is to be submitted electronically to the designated folder on the designated shared drive and hyperlinked to the Effectiveness Measure above for each student learning outcome.) The program expects 80% of M.Ed. candidates to receive ratings of ‘2’ (Acceptable) or better ‘3’ (Target) on rubric using a 3 point scale. ( Leadership Project) 2011 Assessment Data (Results can be shown by year or by semester) 2012 Assessment Data (Results can be shown by year or by semester) Program CHFD MEd CHFD MEd Semester Spring/Fall 2011 Spring/Fall 2012 9 8 Leadership Project 1. Statement of Goal 100% 100% Leadership Project 5. Self Evaluation of Leadership 100% 100% Leadership Project 6. Mentor Evaluation of Leadership 100% 100% Plans for 2013-2014: Based upon the assessment data included in this annual report, what changes/improvements will the program implement during the next academic year to improve performance on this student learning outcome? Based on review of the previous semester data all performance outcomes were met. Candidates in the M.Ed. Special Education Program achieved above 80% on all performance criteria. It was determined that no changes are needed at this time. Assessment Lead’s Comments on Student Learning Outcome: Student Learning Outcome 5 (knowledge, skill or ability to be assessed) Advanced teacher candidates demonstrate a thorough understanding of assessment through analysis of student, classroom, and school performance data and subsequent data-driven decisions about strategies for teaching and learning so that all students learn. Changes to the Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan: If any changes were made to the assessment plan (which includes the Student Learning Outcome, Effectiveness Measure, Methodology and Performance Outcome) for this student learning outcome since your last report was submitted, briefly summarize the changes made and the rationale for the changes.
2012-13%20Student%20Learning%20Outcomes%20CHFS%20MEd%20Annual%20Report_0.docx