Annual Gifts Received ($M) -32.7% 10.9 8.0 9.0 10.0 Endowment ($M) -12.8% 77.4 77.0 80.0 90.0 SUBTOTAL OF IMPROVING METRICS 5 4 7 6 9 11 16 15 TOTAL OF IMPROVING METRICS Notes: (1) SAT trends are based on 3 year average, (2) Professional licensure pass rates are based on the 2010-11 Annual Accountability Report with data that spans multiple time periods, (3) Percent of graduates employed and continuing their education is based on 2009-10 data from FETPIP. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Goals Specific to Research Universities 5 YEAR 3 YEAR TREND 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 GOALS (2005-06 ACTUAL ESTIMATES GOALS (2014-15) to 2010-11) Academic Quality Faculty Awards %∆ x1 x x x National Academy Members %∆ x x x x Number of Post-Doctoral Appointees %∆ xx xx xx xx Number of Science & Engineering Disciplines Nationally Ranked in Top 100 n/a x x x x for Research Expenditures (based on 8 broad discipline areas, and includes private universities) x x x x SUBTOTAL OF IMPROVING METRICS Operational Efficiency The Board of Governors will work with Universities to To Be Determined develop metrics associated with Operational Efficiencies. Return on Investment Research Expenditures ($M) %∆ $ xx.x $ xx.x $ xx.x $ xx.x (includes non-Science & Engineering disciplines) Science & Engineering Research %∆ $ xx.x $ xx.x $ xx.x $ xx.x Expenditures ($M) Percent of Research Expenditures %∆ X% X% X% X% funded from External Sources Patents Issued %∆ x x x x Licenses/Options Executed %∆ x x x x Licensing Income Received ($M) %∆ $ x.x $ x.x $ x.x $ x.x %∆ x x x x Number of Start-up Companies Science & Engineering R&D Expenditures %∆ xx xx xx xx in Non-Medical/Health Sciences National Rank is Higher than Predicted n/a NR-FR n/a n/a n/a by the Financial Resources Ranking (based on U.S. News & World Report) Research Doctoral Degrees Awarded %∆ xx xx xx xx
Annual Gifts Received ($M) -32.7% 10.9 8.0 9.0 10.0 Endowment ($M) -12.8% 77.4 77.0 80.0 90.0 SUBTOTAL OF IMPROVING METRICS 5 4 7 6 TOTAL OF IMPROVING METRICS 9 11 16 15 Notes: (1) SAT trends are based on 3 year average, (2) Professional licensure pass rates are based on the 2010-11 Annual Accountability Report with data that spans multiple time periods, (3) Percent of graduates employed and continuing their education is based on 2009-10 data from FETPIP. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Goals Specific to Research Universities 5 YEAR TREND (2005-06 to 2010-11) 2010-11 ACTUAL 2011-12 ESTIMATES 2012-13 GOALS 3 YEAR GOALS (2014-15) Academic Quality Faculty Awards %∆ x1 x x x National Academy Members %∆ x x x x Number of Post-Doctoral Appointees %∆ xx xx xx xx Number of Science & Engineering Disciplines Nationally Ranked in Top 100 for Research Expenditures (based on 8 broad discipline areas, and includes private universities) n/a x x x x SUBTOTAL OF IMPROVING METRICS x x x x Operational Efficiency To Be Determined The Board of Governors will work with Universities to develop metrics associated with Operational Efficiencies. Return on Investment Research Expenditures ($M) (includes non-Science & Engineering disciplines) %∆ $ xx.x $ xx.x $ xx.x $ xx.x Science & Engineering Research Expenditures ($M) %∆ $ xx.x $ xx.x $ xx.x $ xx.x Percent of Research Expenditures funded from External Sources %∆ X% X% X% X% Patents Issued %∆ x x x x Licenses/Options Executed %∆ x x x x Licensing Income Received ($M) %∆ $ x.x $ x.x $ x.x $ x.x Number of Start-up Companies %∆ x x x x Science & Engineering R&D Expenditures in Non-Medical/Health Sciences %∆ xx xx xx xx National Rank is Higher than Predicted by the Financial Resources Ranking (based on U.S. News & World Report) n/a NR-FR n/a n/a n/a Research Doctoral Degrees Awarded %∆ xx xx xx xx
2012-13%20UNF%20Workplan.docx