2.1.2 The alignment between assessment and the learning 0 1 2 outcomes in the programme must be systematically and regularly reviewed to ensure its effectiveness. 2.2 : Assessment Method 2.2.1 There must be a variety of methods and tools that are 0 1 2 appropriate for the assessment of learning outcomes and competencies. 2.2.2 There must be mechanisms to ensure, and to periodically 0 1 2 review, the validity, reliability, integrity, currency and fairness of the assessment methods. 2.2.3 The frequency, methods, and criteria of student 0 1 2 assessment— including the grading system and appeal policies—must be documented and communicated to students on the commencement of the programme. 2.2.4 Changes to student assessment methods must follow 0 1 2 established procedures and regulations and be communicated to students prior to their implementation. 2.3: Management of Student Assessment 2.3.1 The department and its academic staff must have 0 1 2 adequate level of autonomy in the management of student assessment. 2.3.2 must be mechanisms to ensure the security of 0 1 2 assessment documents and records. 2.3.3 The assessment results must be communicated to 0 1 2 students before the commencement of a new semester to facilitate progression decision. 2.3.4 The department must have appropriate guidelines and 0 1 2 mechanisms for students to appeal their course results. 2.3.5 The department must periodically review the 0 1 2 management of student assessment and act on the findings of the review. AREA 3 : STUDENT SELECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES 3.1: Student Selection Standard Aspects 0 1 2 3.1.1 The programme must have clear criteria and processes 0 1 2 for student selection (including that of transfer students) and these must be consistent with applicable requirements. 3.1.2 The criteria and processes of student selection must be 0 1 2 transparent and objective.
2.1.2 The alignment between assessment and the learning outcomes in the programme must be systematically and regularly reviewed to ensure its effectiveness. 0 1 2 2.2 : Assessment Method 2.2.1 There must be a variety of methods and tools that are appropriate for the assessment of learning outcomes and competencies. 0 1 2 2.2.2 There must be mechanisms to ensure, and to periodically review, the validity, reliability, integrity, currency and fairness of the assessment methods. 0 1 2 2.2.3 The frequency, methods, and criteria of student assessment— including the grading system and appeal policies—must be documented and communicated to students on the commencement of the programme. 0 1 2 2.2.4 Changes to student assessment methods must follow established procedures and regulations and be communicated to students prior to their implementation. 0 1 2 2.3: Management of Student Assessment 2.3.1 The department and its academic staff must have adequate level of autonomy in the management of student assessment. 0 1 2 2.3.2 must be mechanisms to ensure the security of assessment documents and records. 0 1 2 2.3.3 The assessment results must be communicated to students before the commencement of a new semester to facilitate progression decision. 0 1 2 2.3.4 The department must have appropriate guidelines and mechanisms for students to appeal their course results. 0 1 2 2.3.5 The department must periodically review the management of student assessment and act on the findings of the review. 0 1 2 AREA 3 : STUDENT SELECTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES 3.1: Student Selection Standard Aspects 0 1 2 3.1.1 The programme must have clear criteria and processes for student selection (including that of transfer students) and these must be consistent with applicable requirements. 0 1 2 3.1.2 The criteria and processes of student selection must be transparent and objective. 0 1 2
SENARAI-SEMAK-PASUKAN-AUDIT-DALAMAN-FAKULTI.docx