In support of these efforts, USDA should draw in its technical (i.e., water) research agencies, for example, the Agricultural Research Service, and others as expertise is available. The range of activities to be considered should include all aspects of the requirements, such as the microbial quality criteria, indicator organism, testing/sampling frequency, test methods (including recognition of the EPAs acceptance of other test methods), treatment options, and flexibility/alternatives allowed; each with a focus on practicality, availability and cost effectiveness. Further, USDA should consider providing consistent funding available for mid- and long-term research, and for grant and loan programs aimed at assisting the impacted stakeholders (e.g., growers and packers) with compliance with the FDA Produce Safety Rule.
In support of these efforts, USDA should draw in its technical (i.e., water) research agencies, for example, the Agricultural Research Service, and others as expertise is available. The range of activities to be considered should include all aspects of the requirements, such as the microbial quality criteria, indicator organism, testing/sampling frequency, test methods (including recognition of the EPAs acceptance of other test methods), treatment options, and flexibility/alternatives allowed; each with a focus on practicality, availability and cost effectiveness. Further, USDA should consider providing consistent funding available for mid- and long-term research, and for grant and loan programs aimed at assisting the impacted stakeholders (e.g., growers and packers) with compliance with the FDA Produce Safety Rule.
Spring2017RecommendationsFoodSafety.docx