Comparisons of Proficiency Status of Students as Determined by Rather 1-2008, Rater 2-2008, and Rater 2009 who Used the Revised Rubric Reading Math Reading Reading Reading Math 1st Math Math 1st Reliability Rescore 2009 Score Reliability Rescore Score 2009 34A Emerging 4 3 6 7 7 10 Novice 10 13 13 11 11 13 Proficient 11 9 6 21 21 16 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emerging 2 3 6 1 1 1 34B Novice 21 20 20 4 4 5 Proficient 3 3 0 3 3 2 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 34C Emerging 2 1 2 2 1 3 Novice 2 3 3 6 6 6 Proficient 2 2 1 2 3 1 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 56A Emerging 3 2 4 3 2 4 Novice 13 11 6 6 8 Proficient 8 11 8 15 16 12 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 4. Cont’d. Reading Math Reading Reading Reading Math 1st Math Math 1st Reliability Rescore 2009 Reliability Rescore Score 2009 56B Emerging 2 2 4 3 2 4 Novice 16 17 16 16 17 16 Proficient 9 8 7 8 8 7 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 56C Emerging 0 0 0 1 1 1 Novice 3 3 7 2 3 5
Comparisons of Proficiency Status of Students as Determined by Rather 1-2008, Rater 2-2008, and Rater 2009 who Used the Revised Rubric Reading Math Reading 1st Score Reading Reliability Reading Rescore 2009 Math 1st Score Math Reliability Math Rescore 2009 34A Emerging 4 3 6 7 7 10 Novice 10 13 13 11 11 13 Proficient 11 9 6 21 21 16 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 34B Emerging 2 3 6 1 1 1 Novice 21 20 20 4 4 5 Proficient 3 3 0 3 3 2 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 34C Emerging 2 1 2 2 1 3 Novice 2 3 3 6 6 6 Proficient 2 2 1 2 3 1 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 56A Emerging 3 2 4 3 2 4 Novice 13 11 6 6 8 Proficient 8 11 8 15 16 12 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 4. Cont’d. Reading Math Reading 1st Score Reading Reliability Reading Rescore 2009 Math 1st Math Reliability Math Rescore 2009 56B Emerging 2 2 4 3 2 4 Novice 16 17 16 16 17 16 Proficient 9 8 7 8 8 7 Advanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 56C Emerging 0 0 0 1 1 1 Novice 3 3 7 2 3 5
2012%20Validity%20Supplemental%20Report.docx