Data extraction form Greater Christchurch Draft Urban Development Strategy 2005 Title of paper: details Population and Plan details and Outcomes Results setting method of appraisal assessed* Greater Authors Country: New Zealand Outcomes measured: Process was supported Limitations identified Plan: Stevenson, A., a) Process outcomes: by those involved (3250 by author(s): Christchurch Urban Banswell, K. and Pink, (i) Health outcomes respondents), strong Development considered: Y R. Setting urban support for Strategy 2005 (ii) Health interdisciplinarity and Limitations identified recommendations limit in what could be by review team: incorporated in proposal: achieved due to limited Population: Y Year: Greater Christchurch resources (staff, money, (iii) Evidence of being Method of appraisal: 2007 time). Evidence gaps &/or implemented: unclear HIA Equity: maori recommendations for (iv) Post-development involvement in process Impact: Greater future research evaluation: unclear Citation: (= process and impact Christchurch Urban evaluation) Vol. 18 (9-10), NSW Development Strategy Public Health Bulletin has now a dedicated Source of funding: b) Specific outcomes: section on health and N/R (i) Physical activity: Y well-being (ii) Mental wellbeing: acknowledging unclear Aim of study: importance of social (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Description of the and environmental Y Greater Christchurch determinants of health (iv) Unintentional injury: Urban Development Participation of maori N/R Strategy 2005’s HIA: its increased. (v) health: Y development and Specify: Hhousing and transport - implementation and the HIA directed the social connectedness results from the process focus on the evaluation. Examines strategy on quality c) Knowledge outcome: whether the HIA is a of life outcomes. Planners health useful tool for local knowledge or skills: N/R government policy HIA has highlighted the significance of
Data extraction form Title of paper: Greater Christchurch Draft Urban Development Strategy 2005 details Population and setting Plan details and method of appraisal Outcomes assessed* Results Authors Stevenson, A., Banswell, K. and Pink, R. Year: 2007 Citation: Vol. 18 (9-10), NSW Public Health Bulletin Aim of study: Description of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy 2005’s HIA: its development and implementation and the results from the process evaluation. Examines whether the HIA is a useful tool for local government policy Country: New Zealand Setting urban Population: Greater Christchurch Equity: maori involvement in process Plan: Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy 2005 Method of appraisal: HIA Outcomes measured: a) Process outcomes: (i) Health outcomes considered: Y (ii) Health recommendations incorporated in proposal: Y (iii) Evidence of being implemented: unclear (iv) Post-development evaluation: unclear (= process and impact evaluation) b) Specific outcomes: (i) Physical activity: Y (ii) Mental wellbeing: unclear (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Y (iv) Unintentional injury: N/R (v) health: Y Specify: Hhousing and transport - social connectedness c) Knowledge outcome: Planners health knowledge or skills: N/R Process was supported by those involved (3250 respondents), strong support for interdisciplinarity and limit in what could be achieved due to limited resources (staff, money, time). Impact: Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy has now a dedicated section on health and well-being acknowledging importance of social and environmental determinants of health Participation of maori increased. HIA directed the focus on the strategy on quality of life outcomes. HIA has highlighted the significance of Limitations identified by author(s): Limitations identified by review team: Evidence gaps &/or recommendations for future research Source of funding: N/R
Spatial_planning_for_Health_Review2_Final_1_April_2010_rev_21_April.docx