revenue allocation, reflect the changing energy market, including a and rate design for later on-peak period and a spring super-off-peak Commission period, while affirming the grandfathering Consideration. provisions for eligible solar customers previously established by the California Public Utilities In UCAN’s Commission and extending the Eligibility Grace examination of the Period for schools. issues presented we focused on rate design D.17-08-030, p. 2 and revenue allocation issues. UCAN’s experts, William Marcus and Garrick Jones from JBS energy produced detailed and extensive testimony covering these topics. (See Exhibits UCAN -01, UCAN -02 and UCAN -03) After a thorough examination, UCAN supported the revenue allocation settlement, which was adopted by the Commission, and we urged rejection of the SDG&E/San Diego Public Schools settlement, which was not adopted by the Commission. Revenue Allocation San Diego Gas & Electric Company (“SDG&E”), Verified Settlement. the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (“ORA”), the Utility Consumers’ Action Network (“UCAN”), In this proceeding, the California Farm Bureau Federation (“Farm over the course of 2 Bureau”), the Federal Executive Agencies months and 10 (“FEA”), the City of San Diego (“City of San settlement discussions, Diego”) and the California City-County Street seven parties Light Association (“CAL-SLA”) (referenced to presented a settlement hereinafter collectively as Parties” or “Settling proposal on revenue individually as respectfully request that “Party”) allocation. the Commission adopt and find reasonable the UCAN was a Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement signatory to the
revenue allocation, and rate design for Commission Consideration. In UCAN’s examination of the issues presented we focused on rate design and revenue allocation issues. UCAN’s experts, William Marcus and Garrick Jones from JBS energy produced detailed and extensive testimony covering these topics. (See Exhibits UCAN -01, UCAN -02 and UCAN -03) After a thorough examination, UCAN supported the revenue allocation settlement, which was adopted by the Commission, and we urged rejection of the SDG&E/San Diego Public Schools settlement, which was not adopted by the Commission. reflect the changing energy market, including a later on-peak period and a spring super-off-peak period, while affirming the grandfathering provisions for eligible solar customers previously established by the California Public Utilities Commission and extending the Eligibility Grace Period for schools. D.17-08-030, p. 2 Revenue Allocation Settlement. In this proceeding, over the course of 2 months and 10 settlement discussions, seven parties presented a settlement proposal on revenue allocation. UCAN was a signatory to the San Diego Gas & Electric Company (“SDG&E”), the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (“ORA”), the Utility Consumers’ Action Network (“UCAN”), the California Farm Bureau Federation (“Farm Bureau”), the Federal Executive Agencies (“FEA”), the City of San Diego (“City of San Diego”) and the California City-County Street Light Association (“CAL-SLA”) (referenced to hereinafter collectively as “Settling Parties” or individually as “Party”) respectfully request that the Commission adopt and find reasonable the Revenue Allocation Settlement Agreement Verified
200492327.docx