Risks Description Impact Probability Consequence Actions L,M,H L,M,H Technical Lead L L The lead-time and Reduce: Resources not available effort to recruit will Peter’s time has been on time and for the have negatively affect agreed. duration timescales. The lack of required skills on Share knowledge with time and for duration other technical staff. will negatively affect Bring in new staff, timescales. either internally from Development Team, or externally. Budget not spent in FY M M Lost budget. Accept: 16/17 Corresponding loss in Deliverables for effort available to FY16/17 have been progress the project. identified. The pilot project is likely M L Delivery will be able to Accept: to last more than 15 satisfy common needs Planning phase has months. (Project of SE and DTI. identified deliverables overruns current end Delivery of that can be provided on milestone). functionality on current MyEd. “New MyEd” (aka New UCP Timescale for delivery of Front-End Framework) New MyEd Framework will be after has been accepted. completion of “New MyEd” framework. APIs do not provide M L Unable to deliver API development work sufficient performance functionality will provide at scale previously expected understanding of the and/or performance at requirement to available from the APIs. develop changes to The scope of UCP may UCP and/or APIs. be adapted to reflect the performance achievable. The architecture may be adapted to improved performance (for example by additional caching). Quality of Data from L L User Acceptance / If this occurs we will upstream systems is perception of quality engage with data poor. and value of UCP is providers to address diminished resulting in this and may update a lack of take up. UCP to clarify the position and inform users.
Risks Description Impact L,M,H Probability L,M,H Consequence Actions Technical Lead Resources not available on time and for the duration L L The lead-time and effort to recruit will have negatively affect timescales. The lack of required skills on time and for duration will negatively affect timescales. Reduce: Peter’s time has been agreed. Share knowledge with other technical staff. Bring in new staff, either internally from Development Team, or externally. Budget not spent in FY 16/17 M M Lost budget. Corresponding loss in effort available to progress the project. Accept: Deliverables for FY16/17 have been identified. The pilot project is likely to last more than 15 months. (Project overruns current end milestone). M L Delivery will be able to satisfy common needs of SE and DTI. Delivery of functionality on “New MyEd” (aka New UCP Front-End Framework) will be after completion of “New MyEd” framework. Accept: Planning phase has identified deliverables that can be provided on current MyEd. Timescale for delivery of New MyEd Framework has been accepted. APIs do not provide sufficient performance at scale M L Unable to deliver functionality previously expected and/or requirement to develop changes to UCP and/or APIs. API development work will provide understanding of the performance at available from the APIs. The scope of UCP may be adapted to reflect the performance achievable. The architecture may be adapted to improved performance (for example by additional caching). Quality of Data from upstream systems is poor. L L User Acceptance / perception of quality and value of UCP is diminished resulting in a lack of take up. If this occurs we will engage with data providers to address this and may update UCP to clarify the position and inform users.
sas002_-_studentcentredporalpidv0.3_3.docx