Observation of vowel motility even beyond Semitic. Among the other insights crossing the divide of language families is the linguistic explanation of Gold is expected to Glisten,” noting “why a linguistic parallel between and GoLd GListen. On the universality of submorphemes, we will exemplify many lexical parallels, in plain sight” within and between languages. “hiding Universal Meanings. On the most ambitious question of universal meanings, our most challenging example will be broadly recognized by researchers as GL, meaning light.’ Obviously this meaning does not fit Hebrew ‘bright examples like but Arabic GLidah GLol aGaL ‘ice-cream,’ ‘roll’), ‘quick. exemplifies the pervasive semantic communalities found. The proposed theory of submorphemes de Saussure’s “modifies” little more than various branches of post-Chomskyan and even “axioms” pre-Chomskyan linguistics. Its innovations like vowel motility lead to new implications in typology and lexical semantics. One indirect example of the way in which Semitic and non-Semitic language structures are brought together is seen in the stenographic system called (spdwrtng) in which vowels are omitted as in Semitic “Speedwriting,” spelling. The comprehensibility of speedwriting in non-Semitic languages supports using Hebrew as starting point for new insights that apply to Hebrew and beyond. For Saussure, He. could have meant even Is this really so? ‘tree.’
Observation of vowel motility even beyond Semitic. Among the other insights crossing the divide of language families is the linguistic explanation of “why Gold is expected to Glisten,” noting a linguistic parallel between GoLd and GListen. On the universality of submorphemes, we will exemplify many lexical parallels, “hiding in plain sight” within and between languages. Universal Meanings. On the most ambitious question of universal meanings, our most challenging example will be GL, broadly recognized by researchers as meaning ‘bright light.’ Obviously this meaning does not fit Hebrew examples like GLidah ‘ice-cream,’ GLol ‘roll’), but Arabic aGaL ‘quick. exemplifies the pervasive semantic communalities found. The proposed theory of submorphemes “modifies” de Saussure’s “axioms” little more than various branches of post-Chomskyan and even pre-Chomskyan linguistics. Its innovations like vowel motility lead to new implications in typology and lexical semantics. One indirect example of the way in which Semitic and non-Semitic language structures are brought together is seen in the stenographic system called “Speedwriting,” (spdwrtng) in which vowels are omitted as in Semitic spelling. The comprehensibility of speedwriting in non-Semitic languages supports using Hebrew as starting point for new insights that apply to Hebrew and beyond. For Saussure, He. even could have meant ‘tree.’ Is this really so?
2-4%20Zev.docx