Section III - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria This Section contains all the criteria that the Employer shall use to evaluate Bids and qualify the Bidders. No other factors, methods or criteria shall be used other than specified in this Bidding Document. The Bidder shall provide all the information requested in the forms included in Section IV, Bidding Forms and/or update any information submitted during Prequalification using the relevant forms included in Section III. Most Advantageous Bid - Evaluation Methodology This Section specifies the methodology to determine the Most Advantageous Bid. The Most Advantageous Bid is the Bid of the Bidder that meets the qualification criteria and whose Bid is: Substantially responsive, and lowest evaluated cost or the best evaluated Bid determined based on the selection method applied i.e. Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS) or Fixed Budget Selection (FBS) as specified in the applicable Regulations. for IPF Borrowers (“Procurement Regulations”) 1. Evaluation Criteria The Employer will evaluate the Technical Proposals using the following criteria: Methodology and Workplan Methodology and Submission [Percentage for, or [Criteria for evaluating Workplan Requirement: must meet each Methodology and TECH Form criterion with Workplan. See User’s separate row for Guide for Examples] each criterion] Staffing Plan Staffing Plan Submission [Percentage for, or [Criteria for evaluating Requirement: must meet each Staffing Plan. See User’s TECH Form criterion with for Examples] separate row for each criterion] 2. Selection Method In the case of Lowest-Evaluated Cost Selection, the Employer shall compare all substantially responsive Bids to determine the lowest-evaluated cost. The Bid of the Bidder with the lowest-evaluated cost will be the Most Advantageous Bid. In the case of QCBS, the financial scores (Sf) of each Financial Proposal will be computed as indicated in the BDS. Bids will be ranked according to their combined technical (St) and financial (Sf) scores using the weights (T = the weight given to the Technical proposal; P = the weight given to the Financial
Section III - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria This Section contains all the criteria that the Employer shall use to evaluate Bids and qualify the Bidders. No other factors, methods or criteria shall be used other than specified in this Bidding Document. The Bidder shall provide all the information requested in the forms included in Section IV, Bidding Forms and/or update any information submitted during Prequalification using the relevant forms included in Section III. Most Advantageous Bid - Evaluation Methodology This Section specifies the methodology to determine the Most Advantageous Bid. The Most Advantageous Bid is the Bid of the Bidder that meets the qualification criteria and whose Bid is: Substantially responsive, and lowest evaluated cost or the best evaluated Bid determined based on the selection method applied i.e. Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS) or Fixed Budget Selection (FBS) as specified in the applicable Regulations. for IPF Borrowers (“Procurement Regulations”) 1. Evaluation Criteria The Employer will evaluate the Technical Proposals using the following criteria: Methodology and Workplan [Percentage for, or must meet each criterion with separate row for each criterion] Methodology and Workplan [Criteria for evaluating Methodology and Workplan. See User’s Guide for Examples] Submission Requirement: TECH Form Staffing Plan [Percentage for, or must meet each criterion with separate row for each criterion] Staffing Plan [Criteria for evaluating Staffing Plan. See User’s for Examples] Submission Requirement: TECH Form 2. Selection Method In the case of Lowest-Evaluated Cost Selection, the Employer shall compare all substantially responsive Bids to determine the lowest-evaluated cost. The Bid of the Bidder with the lowest-evaluated cost will be the Most Advantageous Bid. In the case of QCBS, the financial scores (Sf) of each Financial Proposal will be computed as indicated in the BDS. Bids will be ranked according to their combined technical (St) and financial (Sf) scores using the weights (T = the weight given to the Technical proposal; P = the weight given to the Financial
SPD-Request-for-Bids-MANAGEMENT-SERVICES-OCT-2017.docx