This set of performance criteria will therefore only be utilised in Phase One to determine how and how well implementation has occurred. Further performance criteria will be developed in Phase Two. Evaluation Methods The evaluation adopted a mix of data collection methods. Methods were selected based on their capacity to answer the key evaluation questions and their ability to be adaptive and responsive to participant groups. The methods will be applied concurrently but separately in phases across the Demonstration period, with some data sources being utilised to answer multiple questions. The figure below provides an overview of the methods selected to be utilised over the four phases of the evaluation What is What are How and in How and What is How and KEQ 1 | KEQ 2 | KEQ 3 | KEQ 4 | KEQ 5 | KEQ 6 | EGL Waikato the outcomes that what ways have in what ways have the value and cost in what ways has and how is it matter to disabled disabled people, disabled Māori of investing in EGL EGL Waikato being people, families families and whānau and their whānau Waikato? changed the implemented? and whānau, effectively achieved been effectively For disabled systems that Potential data community, their outcomes? engaged and people? For support disabled collection method providers, and What contribution utilised EGL families and people and government? has the EGL Waikato Waikato? whānau? For families and Demonstration community? whānau? made to those For providers? For outcomes? funders? Evaluative Rubrics ✓ ✓ Interviews / Hui / ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Fono Focus Groups / ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Wānanga / Talanoa Personal Stories / ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Pūrākau Economic evaluation ✓ approach Survey ✓ ✓ ✓ Document Analysis ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Administrative Data ✓ ✓ ✓ Analysis Figure 12: Evaluation methods to be utilised across the Demonstration, by KEQ For Phase One of the evaluation, the following methods were utilised: Brief document review 16 interviews / hui 13 EGL Waikato participant interviews, representing 14 participants Waikato Leadership Group hui Māori Co-Design members interview EGL Waikato Co-Directors interview Two focus groups EGL Waikato Tūhono/Connectors
This set of performance criteria will therefore only be utilised in Phase One to determine how and how well implementation has occurred. Further performance criteria will be developed in Phase Two. Evaluation Methods The evaluation adopted a mix of data collection methods. Methods were selected based on their capacity to answer the key evaluation questions and their ability to be adaptive and responsive to participant groups. The methods will be applied concurrently but separately in phases across the Demonstration period, with some data sources being utilised to answer multiple questions. The figure below provides an overview of the methods selected to be utilised over the four phases of the evaluation Potential data collection method KEQ 1 | What is EGL Waikato and how is it being implemented? KEQ 2 | What are the outcomes that matter to disabled people, families and whānau, community, providers, and government? KEQ 3 | How and in what ways have disabled people, families and whānau effectively achieved their outcomes? What contribution has the EGL Waikato Demonstration made to those outcomes? KEQ 4 | How and in what ways have disabled Māori and their whānau been effectively engaged and utilised EGL Waikato? KEQ 5 | What is the value and cost of investing in EGL Waikato? For disabled people? For families and whānau? For community? For providers? For funders? KEQ 6 | How and in what ways has EGL Waikato changed the systems that support disabled people and families and whānau? Evaluative Rubrics ✓ ✓ Interviews / Hui / Fono ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Focus Groups / Wānanga / Talanoa ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Personal Stories / Pūrākau ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Economic evaluation approach ✓ Survey ✓ ✓ ✓ Document Analysis ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Administrative Data Analysis ✓ ✓ ✓ Figure 12: Evaluation methods to be utilised across the Demonstration, by KEQ For Phase One of the evaluation, the following methods were utilised: Brief document review 16 interviews / hui 13 EGL Waikato participant interviews, representing 14 participants Waikato Leadership Group hui Māori Co-Design members interview EGL Waikato Co-Directors interview Two focus groups EGL Waikato Tūhono/Connectors
00-Evaluation-Report-Phase-One-EGL-Waikato-Feb16-Final-090316.docx