Equity: lower incomes, HIA Health effect (iii) Evidence of being Equity: no special – implemented: unclear people with mobility screening (= HIA rapid mention to equity in (iv) Post-adoption problems appraisal) HIA evaluation: unclear Community b) Specific issues: effectiveness: (i) Physical activity: Y modest achievement, (ii) Mental wellbeing: Y better relationship (iii) Air / noise quality etc: with local civil Y servants but passive (iv) Unintentional injury: involvement at later unclear (v) Other health: N/R stages of Specify: c) Knowledge outcome: HIA led to new Planners health thoughts on health knowledge or skills: N/R promotion (eg physical activity), but d) Other outcome: N/R little impact on health Specify: protection (eg polluted soil, air pollution) Finland Country: Plan: detailed Outcomes measured: SIA direct effects on Limitations identified plan for Korteniitty a) Process outcomes: the plan were difficult by review team: (i) Health outcomes to distinguish: Too few interviews and considered: Y Setting (eg urban/rural) Method of appraisal: no triangulation to g et (ii) Health Jyväskylä HIA and social impact= However SIA a sufficient analysis recommendations supported incorporated in plan: in city Prospective discussion, planning Y and 6700 in Korteniitty Participative social and decision-making (iii) Evidence of being (size , characteristics impact assessment Provided residents implemented: unclear with information (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: unclear From plan summary b) Specific issues: report: (i) Physical activity: Y Positive impact on (ii) Mental wellbeing: N/R various aspects
Equity: lower incomes, people with mobility problems HIA – Health effect screening (= HIA rapid appraisal) (iii) Evidence of being implemented: unclear (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: unclear b) Specific issues: (i) Physical activity: Y (ii) Mental wellbeing: Y (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Y (iv) Unintentional injury: unclear (v) Other health: N/R Specify: c) Knowledge outcome: Planners health knowledge or skills: N/R d) Other outcome: N/R Specify: Equity: no special mention to equity in HIA Community effectiveness: modest achievement, better relationship with local civil servants but passive involvement at later stages of HIA led to new thoughts on health promotion (eg physical activity), but little impact on health protection (eg polluted soil, air pollution) Country: Finland Setting (eg urban/rural) Jyväskylä in city and 6700 in Korteniitty (size , characteristics Plan: detailed plan for Korteniitty Method of appraisal: HIA and social impact= Prospective Participative social impact assessment Outcomes measured: a) Process outcomes: (i) Health outcomes considered: Y (ii) Health recommendations incorporated in plan: Y (iii) Evidence of being implemented: unclear (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: unclear b) Specific issues: (i) Physical activity: Y (ii) Mental wellbeing: N/R SIA direct effects on the plan were difficult to distinguish: However SIA supported discussion, planning and decision-making Provided residents with information From plan summary report: Positive impact on various aspects Limitations identified by review team: Too few interviews and no triangulation to g et a sufficient analysis
Spatial_planning_for_Health_Review2_Final_1_April_2010_rev_21_April.docx