SECTION B: IC 20-28-11.5 Compliance of Staff Performance Evaluation Plans Question Evidence Notes B.1 Was the evaluation plan submitted to the IDOE by September 15, DOE Online submission 2015? Was a coversheet completed? Completed coversheet Question Evidence Did you have staff that were rated Improvement Necessary and/or 90 day improvement plan B.2 Ineffective? How was targeted professional development provided to PD planning protocol them? Evaluation data analysis Question Evidence Notes How is feedback being tracked for all educators? How did final Tracking document for feedback B.3 evaluation ratings inform school/district professional development? PD schedule Strengths/weaknesses tracking of educators Question Evidence Notes B.4 Have any students been instructed by a teacher rated ineffective for Notification to parents two consecutive years? Question Evidence Notes How did the district provide training to all evaluators? Is the training Training agendas and PowerPoints B.5 conducted annually? Ongoing training needs (i.e. reliability) Question Evidence Notes How did the district leverage the Title II grant toward educator Title IIa application program and B.6 effectiveness? funds Question Evidence Notes B.7 Did anyone file for a private conference with the superintendent after Final DOE-ER report for Ineffective the teacher received the rating of Ineffective? Letter to supt. requesting conference Question Evidence Notes Were any HR decisions made after the final summative scores were HR records (2 consecutive years B.8 calculated? Improvement Necessary or 1 year Ineffective) Question Evidence Notes B.9 How can the IDOE help you with staff performance evaluation plan Questions, clarifications, etc. implementation? SECTION C: ESEA Flexibility Waiver Question Evidence Notes C.1 Equitable distribution plan
SECTION B: IC 20-28-11.5 Compliance of Staff Performance Evaluation Plans B.1 Question Was the evaluation plan submitted to the IDOE by September 15, 2015? Was a coversheet completed? Evidence DOE Online submission Completed coversheet Notes B.2 Question Did you have staff that were rated Improvement Necessary and/or Ineffective? How was targeted professional development provided to them? Evidence 90 day improvement plan PD planning protocol Evaluation data analysis B.3 Question How is feedback being tracked for all educators? How did final evaluation ratings inform school/district professional development? Evidence Tracking document for feedback PD schedule Strengths/weaknesses tracking of educators Notes B.4 Question Have any students been instructed by a teacher rated ineffective for two consecutive years? Evidence Notification to parents Notes B.5 Question How did the district provide training to all evaluators? Is the training conducted annually? Evidence Training agendas and PowerPoints Ongoing training needs (i.e. reliability) Notes B.6 Question How did the district leverage the Title II grant toward educator effectiveness? Evidence Title IIa application program and funds Notes B.7 Question Did anyone file for a private conference with the superintendent after the teacher received the rating of Ineffective? Evidence Final DOE-ER report for Ineffective Letter to supt. requesting conference Notes B.8 Question Were any HR decisions made after the final summative scores were calculated? Evidence HR records (2 consecutive years Improvement Necessary or 1 year Ineffective) Notes B.9 Question How can the IDOE help you with staff performance evaluation plan implementation? Evidence Questions, clarifications, etc. Notes SECTION C: ESEA Flexibility Waiver C.1 Question Evidence Equitable distribution plan Notes
site-monitoring-document-sy-15-16.docx