was alleged that the second Respondent acting as an expert witness, made incorrect statements regarding the boundary walls and damp proofing throughout the dwelling. 45. M Ungerer The Respondent signed off a (2013/11/07 53) Insufficient evidence of – against J Singh completion certificate whilst not improper conduct from Pr Tech Eng attending to any site the complainant. (200170137) inspections. It is further alleged that the respondent stated that the A19 was not a legally binding document and that he had no contractual obligations to fulfill as the complainant was not his client. 46. R Lees v It is alleged that the (2014/05/12 18) No prima-facie – M M B van Respondent was appointed as evidence of improper Rooyen Pr Eng the competent person for the conduct. (880203) design of a reinforced concrete raft foundation, which has since developed major cracks. The Complainant alleged that the Respondent was not accepting responsibility for the failure of the foundations.
was alleged that the second Respondent acting as an expert witness, made incorrect statements regarding the boundary walls and damp proofing throughout the dwelling. 45. M Ungerer against J Singh Pr Tech Eng (200170137) The Respondent signed off a completion certificate whilst not attending to any site inspections. It is further alleged that the respondent stated that the A19 was not a legally binding document and that he had no contractual obligations to fulfill as the complainant was not his client. (2013/11/07 – 53) Insufficient evidence of improper conduct from the complainant. 46. R Lees v M M B van Rooyen Pr Eng (880203) It is alleged that the Respondent was appointed as the competent person for the design of a reinforced concrete raft foundation, which has since developed major cracks. The Complainant alleged that the Respondent was not accepting responsibility for the failure of the foundations. (2014/05/12 – 18) No prima-facie evidence of improper conduct.
RNW1776-161005.docx