Ms Shaanika 3 in terms of the application if it is opposed as I see Mr Norman “Prayer Tjombe standing up and not following the Rule because he is known of (indistinct) the rule. Then the cost should be ordered to him Court: No just hold on. May I ask you to guard your language. Ms Shaanika: Okay (sic) thank u (sic) very much, I am sorry. You(sic) understand? Ms Shaanika: Yes Court: I am not going to allow you to be ruled by emotions. Whoever is in this court room deserves respect in as much as I am sure you yearn for that respect. If you want to be respected also exercise that respect to others. Let us continue. Ms Shaanika: I shall do so.” [6] As shown by these exchanges it is clear that applicant was extremely rude to Mr Tjombe and she apologized. The court allowed her to make her oral submissions regarding her application to compel but she did not confine herself to that but instead went further and narrated the history of the matter which the court did not prevent her to do, but, allowed her to do so as she is a self-actor and the court exercised its judicial discretion in allowing her to make those submissions. [7] As she had submitted that Mr Tjombe had no locus standi, it was only fair to hear what his position was bearing in mind that he had in fact filed his principals’ resolution on the 25 October 2012 which was authority for him to represent the respondents. I concluded that in fact first respondent had complied with the order to compel it to furnish applicant with a record of proceedings which was missing. In her response, applicant stated the following (at page 14 of the typed record) Ms Shaanika
Ms Shaanika “Prayer 3 in terms of the application if it is opposed as I see Mr Norman Tjombe standing up and not following the Rule because he is known of (indistinct) the rule. Then the cost should be ordered to him Court: No just hold on. May I ask you to guard your language. Ms Shaanika: Okay (sic) thank u (sic) very much, I am sorry. You(sic) understand? Ms Shaanika: Yes Court: I am not going to allow you to be ruled by emotions. Whoever is in this court room deserves respect in as much as I am sure you yearn for that respect. If you want to be respected also exercise that respect to others. Let us continue. Ms Shaanika: I shall do so.” [6] As shown by these exchanges it is clear that applicant was extremely rude to Mr Tjombe and she apologized. The court allowed her to make her oral submissions regarding her application to compel but she did not confine herself to that but instead went further and narrated the history of the matter which the court did not prevent her to do, but, allowed her to do so as she is a self-actor and the court exercised its judicial discretion in allowing her to make those submissions. [7] As she had submitted that Mr Tjombe had no locus standi, it was only fair to hear what his position was bearing in mind that he had in fact filed his principals’ resolution on the 25 October 2012 which was authority for him to represent the respondents. I concluded that in fact first respondent had complied with the order to compel it to furnish applicant with a record of proceedings which was missing. In her response, applicant stated the following (at page 14 of the typed record) Ms Shaanika
Shaanika%20v%20Minister%20of%20Justice%20(A%20411-2013)%20[2014]%20NAHCMD%2016%20(24%20January%202014).docx