Assessment Rubric for Unit 5 Criteria 0 1 (Poor) 2 (Acceptable) 3 (Good) Score Direction of Direction of Direction of Prediction of groundwater flow groundwater flow groundwater flow direction of is correctly is correctly is correctly groundwater predicted and predicted and predicted but not flow and justified based on justified based on explained well. application to None water table levels. water table levels. Soil sample Groundwater flow Groundwater flow recommendations for soil is not included in is included in the do not include samples (#1 the reasoning for reasoning for soil groundwater flow and #3) soil sample sample in reasoning. recommendations. recommendations. Students explain the connection Students explain between soil the connection permeability and Students describe between soil the potential for Soil soil permeability permeability and groundwater permeability but do not the potential for contamination. as a measure correctly apply it groundwater Students predict None to predict to predict the contamination. the potential for potential for They predict the groundwater potential for contamination groundwater potential for contamination and contamination. groundwater also identify that contamination in the impermeable, this case. clay level is below the water table in this case. Language errors Student is able to are a major express ideas obstacle for Student is able to None, clearly and/or with comprehending communicate detail using Language the student’s with some errors specialized writing OR and language vocabulary from language gaps. the unit. Writing production is shows few errors. minimal
Assessment Rubric for Unit 5 Criteria 0 1 (Poor) 2 (Acceptable) 3 (Good) Score Prediction of direction of groundwater flow and application to for soil samples (#1 and #3) None Direction of groundwater flow is correctly predicted but not explained well. Soil sample recommendations do not include groundwater flow in reasoning. Direction of groundwater flow is correctly predicted and justified based on water table levels. Groundwater flow is not included in the reasoning for soil sample recommendations. Direction of groundwater flow is correctly predicted and justified based on water table levels. Groundwater flow is included in the reasoning for soil sample recommendations. Soil permeability as a measure to predict potential for contamination None Students describe soil permeability but do not correctly apply it to predict the potential for groundwater contamination. Students explain the connection between soil permeability and the potential for groundwater contamination. They predict the potential for groundwater contamination in this case. Students explain the connection between soil permeability and the potential for groundwater contamination. Students predict the potential for groundwater contamination and also identify that the impermeable, clay level is below the water table in this case. Language None, Language errors are a major obstacle for comprehending the student’s writing OR language production is minimal Student is able to communicate with some errors and language gaps. Student is able to express ideas clearly and/or with detail using specialized vocabulary from the unit. Writing shows few errors.
rubric_evaluate_actividades_pa.v2.docx