APSC-100 Module 3: Final team evaluation 1 2 3 4 Mark (not demonstrated) (marginal) (meets expectations) (outstanding) Information Management No significant Insufficient usage; improper Gathers and uses information Uses information from multiple information used, not citations. from appropriate sources, authoritative, objective, reliable /4 3.04-FY4: Gathers info cited; blatant including applicable standards, sources; cited and formatted plagiarism. patents, regulations as properly appropriate, with proper citations Project Management No useful timeline or Poor timeline or budget; Plans and efficiently manages Efficient, excellent project plan budget described; infrequent meetings; minor time and money; team effectively presented; detailed budget; /4 poorly managed safety problems used meetings; safety potential foreseen and 3.11-FY1: Manage time project; safety issues considerations are clear mitigated and money No discussion of Generic design process Describes design process used to Comprehensive design process Design process /4 design process. described. design system, component, or described, with appropriate 3.04-FY1: Uses process process to solve open-ended iterations and revisions based on complex problem. project progress Social, environmental, No consideration of Factors mentioned but no Incorporated appropriate social, Well-reasoned analysis of these /4 and financial factors these factors. evidence of impact on environmental, and financial factors, with risks mitigated where decision making. factors in decision making possible 3.09-FY4: Sustainability in decisions Implementation Insufficient Sufficient implementation but Appropriate effort, analysis, Outstanding implementation /4 implementation some opportunities not and/or construction demonstrated taken, or feedback at to implement product, process, or proposal not incorporated in system implementation Evaluation No evaluation of Some factors missed in Compares the design solution Comprehensive evaluation of /4 design solution evaluating design solution against the project objectives and design solution, with 3.04-FY7: Compares functional specifications, providing recommendations for solution qualitative evaluation where future work or implementation appropriate Written communication Poorly constructed Some organization Report achieves goal formal Professional tone, convincing /4 report problems, minor formatting tone, properly formatted, argument, authoritative, skillful problems, redundancy, concisely written, appropriate use transitions spelling grammar/errors of figures, few spelling/grammar errors
APSC-100 Module 3: Final team evaluation 1 (not demonstrated) 2 (marginal) 3 (meets expectations) 4 (outstanding) Mark Information Management 3.04-FY4: Gathers info No significant information used, not cited; blatant plagiarism. Insufficient usage; improper citations. Gathers and uses information from appropriate sources, including applicable standards, patents, regulations as appropriate, with proper citations Uses information from multiple authoritative, objective, reliable sources; cited and formatted properly /4 Project Management 3.11-FY1: Manage time and money No useful timeline or budget described; poorly managed project; safety issues Poor timeline or budget; infrequent meetings; minor safety problems Plans and efficiently manages time and money; team effectively used meetings; safety considerations are clear Efficient, excellent project plan presented; detailed budget; potential foreseen and mitigated /4 Design process 3.04-FY1: Uses process No discussion of design process. Generic design process described. Describes design process used to design system, component, or process to solve open-ended complex problem. Comprehensive design process described, with appropriate iterations and revisions based on project progress /4 Social, environmental, and financial factors 3.09-FY4: Sustainability in decisions No consideration of these factors. Factors mentioned but no evidence of impact on decision making. Incorporated appropriate social, environmental, and financial factors in decision making Well-reasoned analysis of these factors, with risks mitigated where possible /4 Implementation Insufficient implementation Sufficient implementation but some opportunities not taken, or feedback at proposal not incorporated in implementation Appropriate effort, analysis, and/or construction demonstrated to implement product, process, or system Outstanding implementation /4 Evaluation 3.04-FY7: Compares solution No evaluation of design solution Some factors missed in evaluating design solution Compares the design solution against the project objectives and functional specifications, providing qualitative evaluation where appropriate Comprehensive evaluation of design solution, with recommendations for future work or implementation /4 Written communication Poorly constructed report Some organization problems, minor formatting problems, redundancy, spelling grammar/errors Report achieves goal formal tone, properly formatted, concisely written, appropriate use of figures, few spelling/grammar errors Professional tone, convincing argument, authoritative, skillful transitions /4
Sample_CEAB_Section3.0_QUEENS_MECHANICAL%20ENGINEERING_2011.docx