Country: Plan: Outcomes measured: The Core Strategy England Peterborough City a) Process outcomes: itself did not mention Council 2006 Scoping (i) Health outcomes but almost ‘health’ considered: Y Report and 2008 Core entirely focuses on the (ii) Health recommendations Strategy Preferred question as to how to incorporated in plan: Options Report deliver economic NR growth. However, the (iii) Evidence of being SEA itself works with implemented: NR Method of appraisal: various health (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: objectives and aspects. NR SEA (within context of SA: The SEA is focussed Used HIA-type b) Specific issues: assessment). more on social & (i) Physical activity: Y behavioural aspects. (ii) Mental wellbeing: NR (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Y Interestingly, it is (iv) Unintentional injury: N reported that Health (v) Other health: Y stakeholders had the Specify: possibility to participate - access to health in the SEA process, but services did not. Health - health inequalities comments came from - open space non-health bodies. E.g. - socio-economic comments (on health - healthier environments and flood risk, - equity issues. biodiversity, accessibility, c) Knowledge outcome: high quality living Planners health knowledge environments, healthy or skills: NR lifestyles) came from the Countryside d) Other outcome: NR Agency, Environment Specify: Agency, English Heritage and ‘Opportunity Peterborough’ (an regeneration company).
Country: England Plan: Peterborough City Council 2006 Scoping Report and 2008 Core Strategy Preferred Options Report Method of appraisal: SEA (within context of SA: Used HIA-type assessment). Outcomes measured: a) Process outcomes: (i) Health outcomes considered: Y (ii) Health recommendations incorporated in plan: NR (iii) Evidence of being implemented: NR (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: NR b) Specific issues: (i) Physical activity: Y (ii) Mental wellbeing: NR (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Y (iv) Unintentional injury: N (v) Other health: Y Specify: - access to health services - health inequalities - open space - socio-economic - healthier environments - equity issues. c) Knowledge outcome: Planners health knowledge or skills: NR d) Other outcome: NR Specify: The Core Strategy itself did not mention ‘health’ but almost entirely focuses on the question as to how to deliver economic growth. However, the SEA itself works with various health objectives and aspects. The SEA is focussed more on social & behavioural aspects. Interestingly, it is reported that Health stakeholders had the possibility to participate in the SEA process, but did not. Health comments came from non-health bodies. E.g. comments (on health and flood risk, biodiversity, accessibility, high quality living environments, healthy lifestyles) came from the Countryside Agency, Environment Agency, English Heritage and ‘Opportunity Peterborough’ (an regeneration company).
Spatial_planning_for_Health_Review2_Final_1_April_2010_rev_21_April.docx