road whereafter AHOA employed an independent engineering service to do an investigation and provide a report on their findings. The report indicated that standard construction procedures were not followed. The Respondent denied responsibility and refused to guarantee the quality of his work. 4. H P Heath The Respondent issued a (2012/05/11-12) The Complainant against R L completion certificate for a roof withdrew the complaint, which had been repaired. The but due to the number Pr said roof was subsequently of complaints received Tech Eng found to be defective. against the (200170125) Respondent, the matter was referred to PROTT as part of their brief. 5. ECSA against Improper Conduct (2013/11/07 - 47) The Investigating E J Pieters Pr Committee considered Cert Eng the Respondent’s (201290010) formal apology. 6. E Maritz It is alleged that the (2013/12/10 - 54) was insufficient against J Respondent was appointed as evidence of improper Erwee Pr Eng the responsible engineer for the conduct by the (950433) Complainant’s home. A dispute Respondent. arose between the builder and the owner and the Respondent who was appointed by the builder refuses to issue the completion certificate. 7. (2014/02/12 04) –
road whereafter AHOA employed an independent engineering service to do an investigation and provide a report on their findings. The report indicated that standard construction procedures were not followed. The Respondent denied responsibility and refused to guarantee the quality of his work. 4. H P Heath against R L Pr Tech Eng (200170125) The Respondent issued a completion certificate for a roof which had been repaired. The said roof was subsequently found to be defective. (2012/05/11-12) The Complainant withdrew the complaint, but due to the number of complaints received against the Respondent, the matter was referred to PROTT as part of their brief. 5. ECSA against E J Pieters Pr Cert Eng (201290010) Improper Conduct (2013/11/07 - 47) The Investigating Committee considered the Respondent’s formal apology. 6. E Maritz against J Erwee Pr Eng (950433) It is alleged that the Respondent was appointed as the responsible engineer for the Complainant’s home. A dispute arose between the builder and the owner and the Respondent who was appointed by the builder refuses to issue the completion certificate. (2013/12/10 - 54) was insufficient evidence of improper conduct by the Respondent. 7. (2014/02/12 – 04)
RNW1776-161005.docx