Appendix 6 Issued Grades below Overall Provider BRAG Rating, Score and Grades Issued Grade 6 5 Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 rating not below 300 Score between Score Score between Score over 601 awarded 301 and 400 between 401 501 and 600 (Weak) (Excellent) and 500 (Unsatisfactory) (Satisfactory) (Very Good) (Good) Provider is Provider has been Provider has Provider has Provider has Provider has unable to unable to meet the demonstrated how fully demonstrated fully demonstrate Standards at an they have met all demonstrated meeting the demonstrated how they meet acceptable level Standards at the meeting the Standards at a meeting all – the Standards important areas for minimum level Standards with high level with Standards – immediate improvement specific areas strong major strengths providing a very remedial action identified for improvement or strengths and and a few areas of high level of required further minor areas for enhancement to assurance - development improvement demonstrate exemplifies best highlighted noted ongoing practice including Continuous delivery of improvement ongoing Continuous Improvement. Improvement Plan Visit within year to Visit will take place within 1 to 2 years Visit will take place after 3 years. to show demonstrate dependant on number of AFIs. progression and improvement. significant improvement within 3 months. If you are a new Provider you will be formally assessed within 2 of beginning to use funding to train apprentices or learners. Appendix 7 The below is an example of what a Provider could use to perform a basic assessment of their organisation against the information entered onto their Self Assessment and Quality Action Plan. It can also be used to summarise what you do best and what you need to improve on. Don't Know/No Plans Standard or Indicator We have plans Nearly there Fully complete Evidence underway
Appendix 6 Issued Grades below Overall Provider BRAG Rating, Score and Grades Issued Grade 6 rating not awarded (Unsatisfactory) 5 below 300 (Weak) Grade 4 Score between 301 and 400 (Satisfactory) Grade 3 Score between 401 and 500 (Good) Grade 2 Score between 501 and 600 (Very Good) Grade 1 Score over 601 (Excellent) Provider is unable to demonstrate how they meet the Standards – immediate remedial action required Provider has been unable to meet the Standards at an acceptable level – important areas for improvement identified Provider has demonstrated how they have met all Standards at the minimum level specific areas for improvement or further development highlighted Provider has fully demonstrated meeting the Standards with strong strengths and minor areas for improvement noted Provider has demonstrated meeting the Standards at a high level with major strengths and a few areas of enhancement to demonstrate ongoing Continuous improvement Provider has fully demonstrated meeting all Standards providing a very high level of assurance - exemplifies best practice including delivery of ongoing Continuous Improvement. Improvement Plan to show progression and significant improvement within 3 months. Visit within year to demonstrate improvement. Visit will take place within 1 to 2 years dependant on number of AFIs. Visit will take place after 3 years. If you are a new Provider you will be formally assessed within 2 of beginning to use funding to train apprentices or learners. Appendix 7 The below is an example of what a Provider could use to perform a basic assessment of their organisation against the information entered onto their Self Assessment and Quality Action Plan. It can also be used to summarise what you do best and what you need to improve on. Standard or Indicator Don't Know/No Evidence We have plans Plans underway Nearly there Fully complete
sds-quality-framework-december-17v2-final.docx