philosophy and public health (national interest) 20 JCSm/FCSm Relative impact level of the journals compared to Measure of journal impact their subfields. 21 C/FCSm Applied impact score of each article/set of articles Dependent on calculation to the mean field average in which the researcher of FCSm has published Indicators of quality: and performance of research ID nr. Indicator Description WOS GS Astro. Enviro.Sci. Phil. Health Comments 1 h-index Cumulative achievement Anbefale reference standard w.r.t specialty. Guidelines how to establish on local (peers in dept), national and expert level if necessary (leaders in field). 2 g-index The distinction between and order of scientists (Egghe, 2006; Harzing, 2008) 3 Greater granularity in comparison Hg-index between researchers with similar h- and indices. 4 Normalized Normalizes h to compare scientists Not relevant for this achievement based across fields 5 H(2) index Weights most productive papers but Weight most productive papers but requires a much higher of requires higher citation level. citation attraction to be included in index. 6 Average number of citations in H core, A-index Describes magnitude of each researcher’s hits, where a large to imply that some papers are more implies that some papers have highly cited than others. Has received a large number of citations information redundancy with h. compared to the rest 7 R-index Citation intensity and improves Square root of H and A index. Pretty sensitivity and differentiability of A much the same as g, but easier to index calculate 8 Comprehensive measure of the Includes citations to all papers (square ħ-index overall structure of citations to root of half of the total number of papers citations to all publications) 9 Impact of papers in the h-core To demanding to be used as reference m-index (median nr of citations to papers in h standard, as detailed citation data core) required. M quotient better.
philosophy and public health (national interest) 20 JCSm/FCSm Relative impact level of the journals compared to their subfields. Measure of journal impact 21 C/FCSm Applied impact score of each article/set of articles to the mean field average in which the researcher has published Dependent on calculation of FCSm Indicators of quality: and performance of research ID nr. Indicator Description WOS GS Astro. Enviro.Sci. Phil. Health Comments 1 h-index Cumulative achievement Anbefale reference standard w.r.t specialty. Guidelines how to establish on local (peers in dept), national and expert level if necessary (leaders in field). 2 g-index The distinction between and order of scientists (Egghe, 2006; Harzing, 2008) 3 Hg-index Greater granularity in comparison between researchers with similar h- and indices. 4 Normalized Normalizes h to compare scientists achievement based across fields Not relevant for this 5 H(2) index Weights most productive papers but requires a much higher of citation attraction to be included in index. Weight most productive papers but requires higher citation level. 6 A-index Describes magnitude of each researcher’s hits, where a large implies that some papers have received a large number of citations compared to the rest Average number of citations in H core, to imply that some papers are more highly cited than others. Has information redundancy with h. 7 R-index Citation intensity and improves sensitivity and differentiability of A index Square root of H and A index. Pretty much the same as g, but easier to calculate 8 ħ-index Comprehensive measure of the overall structure of citations to papers Includes citations to all papers (square root of half of the total number of citations to all publications) 9 m-index Impact of papers in the h-core (median nr of citations to papers in h core) To demanding to be used as reference standard, as detailed citation data required. M quotient better.
2._Deliverable_5.3.docx