significance of connections. those connections. liked it” “I hated it”—are like it” clearly “I hated it”—are anchored in anchored in analysis. insightful analysis. Relevance and Rich and fully Thoughtful Postings reflect a Postings reflect a Incorrect or Connections developed, if responses to cursory if correct cursory and even absent brief, ideas the assigned reading of the text, incorrect reading of reading of the Determine information need, and readings, question at issue, or the text, question at text, question find and cite connections to question at lecture notes. Little issue, or lecture at issue, or relevant information the assigned issue or to specificity in referring to notes. Opinions may lecture notes. readings, others’ the text. Postings be irrelevant or Tangential question at answers to the demonstrate a weak tangential. No postings that issue or question. engagement with the quotes or specificity. may be others’ Specific text. There is some Postings rambling with answers to the references to application of previous demonstrate a lack rather “filler” question. the text, reading to present text, of engagement with than serious Specific including but it is unclear and the text; the reader work engaged references to quotes, are inconsistent. of the posting may in the text or the text, consistent. Occasional irrelevant or feel as if the student question at Reading notes has only read a Cliff issue. including tangential material quotes, are demonstrate included. Notes version of the consistent and thoughtful text. There is little or incisive. effort to no application of the Insightful engage previous reading to applications directly with the present text.
significance of those connections. like it” “I hated it”—are anchored in insightful analysis. connections. liked it” “I hated it”—are clearly anchored in analysis. Relevance and Connections Determine information need, find and cite relevant information Rich and fully developed, if brief, ideas and connections to the assigned readings, question at issue or others’ answers to the question. Specific references to the text, including quotes, are consistent and incisive. Insightful applications Thoughtful responses to the assigned readings, question at issue or to others’ answers to the question. Specific references to the text, including quotes, are consistent. Reading notes demonstrate thoughtful effort to engage directly with Postings reflect a cursory if correct reading of the text, question at issue, or lecture notes. Little specificity in referring to the text. Postings demonstrate a weak engagement with the text. There is some application of previous reading to present text, but it is unclear and inconsistent. Occasional irrelevant or tangential material included. Postings reflect a cursory and even incorrect reading of the text, question at issue, or lecture notes. Opinions may be irrelevant or tangential. No quotes or specificity. Postings demonstrate a lack of engagement with the text; the reader of the posting may feel as if the student has only read a Cliff Notes version of the text. There is little or no application of the previous reading to the present text. Incorrect or absent reading of the text, question at issue, or lecture notes. Tangential postings that may be rambling with “filler” rather than serious work engaged in the text or question at issue.
rubric_think_eng_sp13.docx