14 series showed equivalent resection margins between open and lap resections 4 series showed significantly better resection margins in lap vs open resections 1 series showed significantly worse resection margins in lap vs open resections LAPAROSCOPIC MINOR-ONLY RESULTS RESECTIONS Type Conversion N of Mortality Complications Blood loss transfusion Operation time Hospital Stay Bile leak Resection margins Comments lesion rate LLR OLR Author Year -mm -mm LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR -posit -posit -<1cm -<1cm -6(0-58) 200 200 140 180 12 45 45 0 2(4,5%) 9(20%) 20(45%) 0 (0-4) 0 (0-10) 7(0-69) -15% -5% Memeo(1) 15biS 15biS -/ -/ Well matched 2014 HCC 0 0 0 Creteil-France 11S 11S -P=0,02 17subS 17subS P=0,15 P=0,01 P=0,11 P=0,18 P=0,02 P<0,0001 -P=0,03 -/ STUDIES Population: 330 150 Elderly 2(11,8%) 2(6,1%) 6(3-15) 8(5-105) 10(0-20) patients > 70 17 34 COMPARATIVE Potential Chan(2) 9LLS duplication in 2014 Malign 0 0 5,8% 4(23,5%) 12(35,2%) 0 0 Ref. 8. Hong Kong-China 1S 2S Excluded 29 P=0,046 P=0,878 P=0,436 P=0,005 P=0,791 cases in the 7subS 16subS lap(12) and open(17) groups in final count
14 series showed equivalent resection margins between open and lap resections 4 series showed significantly better resection margins in lap vs open resections 1 series showed significantly worse resection margins in lap vs open resections LAPAROSCOPIC MINOR-ONLY RESULTS RESECTIONS Author Year N Type of lesion Mortality Conversion rate Complications Blood loss transfusion Operation time Hospital Stay Bile leak Resection margins Comments LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR OLR LLR -mm -posit -<1cm OLR -mm -posit -<1cm COMPARATIVE STUDIES Memeo(1) Creteil-France 2014 45 15biS 11S 17subS 45 15biS 11S 17subS HCC 0 2(4,5%) 0 9(20%) 20(45%) 200 200 0 (0-4) 0 (0-10) 140 180 7(0-69) 12 0 0 -5% -/ -6(0-58) -15% -/ Well matched P=0,15 P=0,01 P=0,11 P=0,18 P=0,02 P<0,0001 -P=0,02 -P=0,03 -/ Chan(2) Hong Kong-China 2014 17 9LLS 1S 7subS 34 2S 16subS Malign 0 0 5,8% 4(23,5%) 12(35,2%) 150 330 2(11,8%) 2(6,1%) 6(3-15) 8(5-105) 0 0 10(0-20) Population: Elderly patients > 70 Potential duplication in Ref. 8. Excluded 29 cases in the lap(12) and open(17) groups in final count P=0,046 P=0,878 P=0,436 P=0,005 P=0,791
SLA_2015_03_13_WAKABAYASHI_1402188_SDC2.docx