Data extraction form Strategic environment assessment in Hong Kong of paper: details Population and Plan details and Outcomes Results Notes setting method of appraisal assessed* Authors Country: Hong Kong Plan: Territorial Outcomes measured: SEA predicted human Limitations identified Ng, K.L., Obbard, J. P. development strategic a) Process outcomes: health related residual by author(s): review (i) Health outcomes impacts in TDS: considered: Y Setting urban with rural Proposed that some (ii) Health Year: spaces of the identified Limitations identified recommendations 2005 problems could be by review team: incorporated in plan: Method of appraisal: mitigated if further does not explain clearly unclear Population: 6.4 M SEA resources were if health outcomes were Citation: applied incorporated in plan, it (iii) Evidence of Environment Others were identified only states that SEA did implemented: N/R International 31 Equity: N/R as requiring policy consider health and that (iv) Post-development evaluation: N/R modifications as no some recommendations mitigation measures were taken into account b) Specific outcomes: feasible in plan (i) Physical activity: N/R (ii) Mental wellbeing: N/R Aim of study: But SEA conducted for conclusions in study (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Examines the the development seem contradictory at Y development and options, but not during time (See results) (iv) Unintentional injury: application of SEA formulation of the N/R process in the planning options Evidence gaps &/or (v) health: Y framework of Hong recommendations for Specify: Kong and evaluates 2 SEA application future research: strategic planning case Overloading of sewage compromised in its infrastructure studies. ability to achieve sustainable Source of funding: not c) Knowledge outcome: development known Planners health Study design: case knowledge or skills: N/R study, methodology not Findings of SEA were described not seriously d) outcome: N/R considered Specify: Quality score: +
Data extraction form of paper: Strategic environment assessment in Hong Kong details Population and setting Plan details and method of appraisal Outcomes assessed* Results Notes Authors Ng, K.L., Obbard, J. P. Year: 2005 Citation: Environment International 31 Aim of study: Examines the development and application of SEA process in the planning framework of Hong Kong and evaluates 2 strategic planning case studies. Study design: case study, methodology not described Quality score: + Country: Hong Kong Setting urban with rural spaces Population: 6.4 M Equity: N/R Plan: Territorial development strategic review Method of appraisal: SEA Outcomes measured: a) Process outcomes: (i) Health outcomes considered: Y (ii) Health recommendations incorporated in plan: unclear (iii) Evidence of implemented: N/R (iv) Post-development evaluation: N/R b) Specific outcomes: (i) Physical activity: N/R (ii) Mental wellbeing: N/R (iii) Air / noise quality etc: Y (iv) Unintentional injury: N/R (v) health: Y Specify: Overloading of sewage infrastructure c) Knowledge outcome: Planners health knowledge or skills: N/R d) outcome: N/R Specify: SEA predicted human health related residual impacts in TDS: Proposed that some of the identified problems could be mitigated if further resources were applied Others were identified as requiring policy modifications as no mitigation measures feasible But SEA conducted for the development options, but not during formulation of the options SEA application compromised in its ability to achieve sustainable development Findings of SEA were not seriously considered Limitations identified by author(s): Limitations identified by review team: does not explain clearly if health outcomes were incorporated in plan, it only states that SEA did consider health and that some recommendations were taken into account in plan conclusions in study seem contradictory at time (See results) Evidence gaps &/or recommendations for future research: Source of funding: not known
Spatial_planning_for_Health_Review2_Final_1_April_2010_rev_21_April.docx