Outcome summary table: SA/SEA of plans in the UK • Evidence of inclusion evidence of inclusion NR Not reported NA Not applicable UC Unclear О No Process outcomes Specific health issues Significant finding comments considered Author, Topic PA MW EHI UI O Year score of validity score issues adoption Quality Health Health Evidence Post External evidence considered recommendations incorporated implementation Peterborough Problem of the overall context within Fischer, T., Matuzzi, M., City Council which SEA is applied: discretionary Nowacki, J. Sustainability planning appears to support at least – (2009) Appraisal of potentially consideration of various – “the its aspects that may go beyond those Development traditionally considered. While legalistic Plan planning traditions appear to lead to a Document limitation of the factors for assessment to Scoping those legally required, they often appear Report and • • • • + ++ NR NR NR Core Strategy to be used subsequently more О О Preferred consistently.” Options Report The Core Strategy itself did not mention ‘health’. Health stakeholders did not participate in the SEA process. & the health comments came from non-health bodies.
Outcome summary table: SA/SEA of plans in the UK • Evidence of inclusion О No evidence of inclusion NR Not reported NA Not applicable UC Unclear Process outcomes Specific health issues considered Quality score External validity score Significant finding comments Author, Year Topic Health issues considered Health recommendations incorporated Evidence of implementation Post adoption evidence PA MW EHI UI O Fischer, T., Matuzzi, M., Nowacki, J. (2009) Peterborough City Council Sustainability Appraisal of its Development Plan Document Scoping Report and Core Strategy Preferred Options Report • О NR NR • NR • О • + ++ Problem of the overall context within which SEA is applied: discretionary planning appears to support – at least potentially – “the consideration of various aspects that may go beyond those traditionally considered. While legalistic planning traditions appear to lead to a limitation of the factors for assessment to those legally required, they often appear to be used subsequently more consistently.” The Core Strategy itself did not mention ‘health’. Health stakeholders did not participate in the SEA process. & the health comments came from non-health bodies.
Spatial_planning_for_Health_Review2_Final_1_April_2010_rev_21_April.docx