To what extent were the changes directly or indirectly To what extent were the changes directly or indirectly produced by the programme interventions? Medium Term Outcomes produced by the programme interventions? Efficiency To what extent has the programme attained the highest To what extent did Outcome 1 projects demonstrate for money’ through the: Short Term Outcomes ‘value value out of available resources? Implementation of a site selection process which considered the costs and anticipated benefits of works at Medium Term Outcomes How could resources be used more productively and potential sites efficiently? Establishment of partnerships for delivering the project (pooling resources, using local knowledge and What could be done differently to improve implementation, experience) and thereby maximise impact, at an acceptable and Coordination of the delivery of (e.g. with other projects, in geographic locations) sustainable cost? Implementation of procurement processes to ensure both quality and quantity from investment, and Leveraging investment from other sources? How could have resources been used more productively and efficiently? Short Term Outcomes Medium Term Outcomes What could be done differently to improve implementation, and thereby maximise impact, at an acceptable and Short Term Outcomes sustainable cost? Medium Term Outcomes Legacy Will the programme’s impacts continue over time and after What evidence is there that the work completed through Outcome 1 will continue to be maintained? Medium Term Outcomes the programme ceases? How likely is it that the outcomes achieved through Outcome 1 will be sustained? Medium Term Outcomes How should the legacy be managed and by whom?
To what extent were the changes directly or indirectly produced by the programme interventions? To what extent were the changes directly or indirectly produced by the programme interventions? Medium Term Outcomes Efficiency To what extent has the programme attained the highest value out of available resources? How could resources be used more productively and efficiently? What could be done differently to improve implementation, and thereby maximise impact, at an acceptable and sustainable cost? To what extent did Outcome 1 projects demonstrate ‘value for money’ through the: Implementation of a site selection process which considered the costs and anticipated benefits of works at potential sites Establishment of partnerships for delivering the project (pooling resources, using local knowledge and experience) Coordination of the delivery of (e.g. with other projects, in geographic locations) Implementation of procurement processes to ensure both quality and quantity from investment, and Leveraging investment from other sources? Short Term Outcomes Medium Term Outcomes How could have resources been used more productively and efficiently? Short Term Outcomes Medium Term Outcomes What could be done differently to improve implementation, and thereby maximise impact, at an acceptable and sustainable cost? Short Term Outcomes Medium Term Outcomes Legacy Will the programme’s impacts continue over time and after the programme ceases? How should the legacy be managed and by whom? What evidence is there that the work completed through Outcome 1 will continue to be maintained? Medium Term Outcomes How likely is it that the outcomes achieved through Outcome 1 will be sustained? Medium Term Outcomes
rlp-evaluation-plan-2018-appendix-1.docx