- healthier environments Wrexham Borough Council. - equity issues. The SA considered social c) Knowledge outcome: and behavioural aspects Planners health knowledge and used quantitative and or skills: NR qualitative methods. d) Other outcome: NR A lot of the baseline data Specify: provided on the different aspects subsequently did not appear to have been used later in and the connection between baseline data and assessment is vague. This suggests that HIA was not used in a fully proactive manner in order to influence the choice of preferred options, but rather in an ex-post manner for mitigating effects of developments that were already decided upon. Country : Germany Plan: Regional plan Outcomes measured: Health stakeholders a) Process outcomes: can participate in SEA of Western Saxony Setting: (i) Health outcomes 2008 considered: Y Authors thinks that the (ii) Health recommendations SEA has influenced 1 M Population: incorporated in plan: decision-making, inhabitants on Method of unclear fair to say” “Probably 4000km2 in Lower (iii) Evidence of being SEA appraisal: that the considerations Saxony implemented: unclear of health in SEA have an (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: impact on final Equity: unclear - general comment making on the fact that SEA refers to monitoring programme. No However, impact likely SEA specific monitoring to have been modest system identified. (based on other
- healthier environments - equity issues. c) Knowledge outcome: Planners health knowledge or skills: NR d) Other outcome: NR Specify: Wrexham Borough Council. The SA considered social and behavioural aspects and used quantitative and qualitative methods. A lot of the baseline data provided on the different aspects subsequently did not appear to have been used later in and the connection between baseline data and assessment is vague. This suggests that HIA was not used in a fully proactive manner in order to influence the choice of preferred options, but rather in an ex-post manner for mitigating effects of developments that were already decided upon. Country : Germany Setting: Population: 1 M inhabitants on 4000km2 in Lower Saxony Equity: Plan: Regional plan of Western Saxony 2008 Method of appraisal: SEA Outcomes measured: a) Process outcomes: (i) Health outcomes considered: Y (ii) Health recommendations incorporated in plan: unclear (iii) Evidence of being implemented: unclear (iv) Post-adoption evaluation: unclear - general comment on the fact that SEA refers to monitoring programme. No SEA specific monitoring system identified. Health stakeholders can participate in SEA Authors thinks that the SEA has influenced decision-making, “Probably fair to say” that the considerations of health in SEA have an impact on final However, impact likely to have been modest (based on other making
Spatial_planning_for_Health_Review2_Final_1_April_2010_rev_21_April.docx