It is drawn neatly and used a ruler for straight lines Labels for all parts and materials used in the construction. Labels written neatly Paragraph 1: OWN DESIGN: Thorough explanation is provided for why each 20 material was used in the design. Paragraph 2: OTHER DESIGNS CONSIDERED: Clear explanation about other designs of solar 20 cooker that were considered is provided. Specific explanation of why each of those designs were disregarded. Paragraph 3: FLAWS IN YOUR DESIGN: Flaws in student’s own design are clearly explained. 20 Suggestions for fixing the in the design are clearly stated. (If the solar cooker was build again…). FORMATTING: Research paper is typed with double spacing Any information taken from sources is cited 20 correctly in the paper. A bibliography is done correctly using the right format Max. Points SOLAR COOKER MODEL Comments Points Earned DESIGN: Design of the solar cooker is creative. It is visually inviting and appealing (someone 20 might want to buy it) It is engaging and attention grabbing QUALITY OF MODEL: Built with a high quality of craftsmanship (The parts of the cooker do not fall apart) 20 Minimum 60% green building materials +10 for 100% materials Attempted to fix problems after the test TESTING: (on 5/31 during the period) The temperature of water rises at least 5 oC in 20 minutes or less time. 20 Has there own 15 ounce can Your design was present for testing FUNCTIONALITY: Starting temp. of the water _________ oC 20 The temperature of the after 40 min. _______ oC
It is drawn neatly and used a ruler for straight lines Labels for all parts and materials used in the construction. Labels written neatly Paragraph 1: OWN DESIGN: Thorough explanation is provided for why each material was used in the design. 20 Paragraph 2: OTHER DESIGNS CONSIDERED: Clear explanation about other designs of solar cooker that were considered is provided. Specific explanation of why each of those designs were disregarded. 20 Paragraph 3: FLAWS IN YOUR DESIGN: Flaws in student’s own design are clearly explained. Suggestions for fixing the in the design are clearly stated. (If the solar cooker was build again…). 20 FORMATTING: Research paper is typed with double spacing Any information taken from sources is cited correctly in the paper. A bibliography is done correctly using the right format 20 SOLAR COOKER MODEL Max. Points Points Earned Comments DESIGN: Design of the solar cooker is creative. It is visually inviting and appealing (someone might want to buy it) It is engaging and attention grabbing 20 QUALITY OF MODEL: Built with a high quality of craftsmanship (The parts of the cooker do not fall apart) Minimum 60% green building materials +10 for 100% materials Attempted to fix problems after the test 20 TESTING: (on 5/31 during the period) The temperature of water rises at least 5 oC in 20 minutes or less time. Has there own 15 ounce can Your design was present for testing 20 FUNCTIONALITY: Starting temp. of the water _________ oC The temperature of the after 40 min. _______ oC 20
SolarCookerRubric.docx