suspended for a period of one year; SACAP v Lucky Segudla fined R4 000.00; SACAP v Michael Liebenberg Number of cases reported to the SAPS - 30 Number of complaints 0 withdrawn SACPCMP 1 complaint of 1 case was against an Total - 4 advertisement of services unregistered person as a Pr CHSA, Pr CM, Pr practicing as Project 1 complaint of unethical CPM and PrC mentor Manager and Council conduct against a even though not registered has no jurisdiction over registered person in any of these categories. unregistered persons no through influencing the The Council has no further action was deemed termination of the jurisdiction over necessary. appointment of an unregistered persons, Architect by the client. however, it was decided 1 complaint of that a formal caution be 1 case of misconduct rendering a service as issued to the person against a registered a Project Manager for concern to desist from person, which upon the development of a doing so and that if he investigation was deemed residential premises continues, such to be unproven, hence the even though not misrepresentation, then complaint was dismissed. registered. the Council reserved its 1 complaint of right to pursue action unprofessional conduct against them. by a registered person 1 case of misconduct for advertising for work against a registered through a promise of person who upon being payment of a referral requested to provide commission. additional information to 1 complaint of substantiate his allegation advertisement of refused to do so hence services as a Pr CHSA, this has been put on hold Pr CM, Pr CPM and until such time that he PrC mentor even provides the information though not registered in requested from him. any of categories. Number of complaints 0 withdrawn
suspended for a period of one year; SACAP v Lucky Segudla fined R4 000.00; SACAP v Michael Liebenberg Number of cases reported to the SAPS - 30 Number of complaints withdrawn 0 SACPCMP Total - 4 1 complaint of unethical conduct against a registered person through influencing the termination of the appointment of an Architect by the client. 1 complaint of rendering a service as a Project Manager for the development of a residential premises even though not registered. 1 complaint of unprofessional conduct by a registered person for advertising for work through a promise of payment of a referral commission. 1 complaint of advertisement of services as a Pr CHSA, Pr CM, Pr CPM and PrC mentor even though not registered in any of categories. 1 complaint of advertisement of services as a Pr CHSA, Pr CM, Pr CPM and PrC mentor even though not registered in any of these categories. The Council has no jurisdiction over unregistered persons, however, it was decided that a formal caution be issued to the person concern to desist from doing so and that if he continues, such misrepresentation, then the Council reserved its right to pursue action against them. 1 case was against an unregistered person practicing as Project Manager and Council has no jurisdiction over unregistered persons no further action was deemed necessary. 1 case of misconduct against a registered person, which upon investigation was deemed to be unproven, hence the complaint was dismissed. 1 case of misconduct against a registered person who upon being requested to provide additional information to substantiate his allegation refused to do so hence this has been put on hold until such time that he provides the information requested from him. Number of complaints withdrawn 0
RNW1776-161005.docx