of new the text. Applications of new lecture notes—to previous lecture material and notes—to the primary previous text. material and Integration of the primary previous texts text. and terms to Consistent and new material competent is outstanding integration of and previous texts consistent. and terms to new material. Uniqueness, Exceptionally Interesting A careful reader can A careful reader may The posting Freshness, insightful, and engaged, follow the logical not be able to does not Originality, well reasoned, well-reasoned argument or approach ascertain the logical contribute to Contribution original or approach to to the text, but the argument being the Construct fresh the text, response may lack offered. Consistently conversation appropriate and approach to lecture notes, originality or freshness unoriginal approach about the defensible reasoning or use of the or others’ and reasoning may to the material, often text. The devolving into to draw conclusions text, lecture postings. show some Reasoning is notes, or instructor and oversimplification or summary. Instructor indefensible others’ others may missed logical steps. and peers may have or postings. The feel that the Ideas may feel overly the sense they are indiscernible. instructor response is familiar or rehashed at reading a rehashing Postings feels she has familiar but times, although there is border on
of new lecture notes—to previous material and the primary text. Integration of previous texts and terms to new material is outstanding and consistent. the text. Applications of new lecture notes—to previous material and the primary text. Consistent and competent integration of previous texts and terms to new material. Uniqueness, Freshness, Originality, Contribution Construct appropriate and defensible reasoning to draw conclusions Exceptionally insightful, well reasoned, original or fresh approach to or use of the text, lecture notes, or others’ postings. The instructor feels she has Interesting and engaged, well-reasoned approach to the text, lecture notes, or others’ postings. The instructor and others may feel that the response is familiar but A careful reader can follow the logical argument or approach to the text, but the response may lack originality or freshness and reasoning may show some oversimplification or missed logical steps. Ideas may feel overly familiar or rehashed at times, although there is A careful reader may not be able to ascertain the logical argument being offered. Consistently unoriginal approach to the material, often devolving into summary. Instructor and peers may have the sense they are reading a rehashing The posting does not contribute to the conversation about the text. Reasoning is indefensible or indiscernible. Postings border on
rubric_think_eng_sp13.docx