requirements regarding press releases, press conferences, press visits, visits by Government officials, productions and other promotional items. Where other agencies and project partners have provided support through co-financing, their branding policies and requirements should be similarly applied. D.5.h. Monitoring and Evaluation Work Plan and Indicative Budget The monitoring and evaluation plan along with indicative budget is summarized in the Table 1 below: Table 1: Projects Monitoring and Evaluation Work Plan and Indicative Budget (USD) M&E activity Responsible Parties Budget Time frame Inception Workshop Project Management 5,000 Within three months of project (IW) Team (PMT) UNDP, start up UNDP-GEF Inception Report PMT None Immediately following Inception PEC, UNDP CO Workshop Measurement of Oversight by PC, Annually prior to APR/PIR and to the Means of Verification UNDP-CO definition of annual work plans for Project Progress UNDP-GEF and Performance (measured on an annual basis) Quarterly/Half Yearly PC/PMT None Quarterly first two Quarters and Half progress reports and UNDP-GEF Yearly thereafter operational reports UNDP-GEF APR/PIR PC/PMT None Annually PEC UNDP-GEF Tripartite Review (TPR) NPD Climate Change None Every year, upon receipt of APR/PIR and TPR report Division UNDP CO PC/PMT UNDP-GEF Project Executive NPD None Following Inception Workshop and half Committee meetings PC/PMT yearly thereafter Technical and periodic PC/PMT To be determined by Project team and status reports Can do it as required. UNDP-CO Mid-term Evaluation Project manager and Indicative At the mid-point of project team Cost:USD implementation (Not Required for MSP UNDP CO 15,000 project but can be undertaken if it is UNDP RCU deemed necessary by the Project External Consultants Board) (i.e. evaluation team)
requirements regarding press releases, press conferences, press visits, visits by Government officials, productions and other promotional items. Where other agencies and project partners have provided support through co-financing, their branding policies and requirements should be similarly applied. D.5.h. Monitoring and Evaluation Work Plan and Indicative Budget The monitoring and evaluation plan along with indicative budget is summarized in the Table 1 below: Table 1: Projects Monitoring and Evaluation Work Plan and Indicative Budget (USD) M&E activity Responsible Parties Budget Time frame Inception Workshop (IW) Project Management Team (PMT) UNDP, UNDP-GEF 5,000 Within three months of project start up Inception Report PMT PEC, UNDP CO None Immediately following Inception Workshop Measurement of Means of Verification for Project Progress and Performance (measured on an annual basis) Oversight by PC, UNDP-CO UNDP-GEF Annually prior to APR/PIR and to the definition of annual work plans Quarterly/Half Yearly progress reports and operational reports PC/PMT UNDP-GEF UNDP-GEF None Quarterly first two Quarters and Half Yearly thereafter APR/PIR PC/PMT PEC UNDP-GEF None Annually Tripartite Review (TPR) and TPR report NPD Climate Change Division UNDP CO PC/PMT UNDP-GEF None Every year, upon receipt of APR/PIR Project Executive Committee meetings NPD PC/PMT None Following Inception Workshop and half yearly thereafter Technical and periodic status reports PC/PMT Can do it as required. To be determined by Project team and UNDP-CO Mid-term Evaluation Project manager and team UNDP CO UNDP RCU External Consultants (i.e. evaluation team) Indicative Cost:USD 15,000 At the mid-point of project implementation (Not Required for MSP project but can be undertaken if it is deemed necessary by the Project Board)
2-17-15_Pakistan_5326_UNDP_ProDoc_0.docx