The scope of each type of monitoring is briefly described in the following sections and in Table 9.1 along with the staffing, and resources needed for the monitoring program. In to effectively report on the effectiveness of the ARAP implementation, the EMUS/MCC will monitor the following key indicators: timely disbursement of compensation; compensation disbursement to the entitled parties; public consultation and grievance procedures in place and functioning; and Physical progress of resettlement and rehabilitation, where applicable. Monitoring will be based on indicators of change in: delivery of compensation, resolution of grievances, social stability, and human and environmental health Performance Indicators will include the following: The number and categories of affected people compensated Adherence to compensation implementation schedule Cases of complaints received, number resolved and number outstanding Accuracy in records of payments made The EMUS/MPW will provide feedback on ARAP implementation and ensure that adverse impacts on affected people are mitigated in a timely manner. M&E will be the main mechanism to alert project management of any delays and problems and will help measure the extent to which the main objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved. M&E activities will be supplemented and verified by monitoring efforts of experts specialized in resettlement issues or a government agency with the same function. The establishment of appropriate indicators in the ARAP is essential since what is measured is what will be considered important. Key performance indicators for monitoring are commonly divided into four categories as follows: 12 A: Key performance indicators Input: Output: Process: Outcome Indicators include the Indicators concern the Indicators represent the Indicators include the resources in terms of activities and services, change in the quality and delivery of compensation people, equipment and which are produced with quantity of access and and other mitigation for materials that go into the the inputs. Examples of coverage of the activities impacts caused by the ARAP. output indicators in the and services. Examples of project. They measure Examples of ARAP include (i) a process indicators in the compensation paid and indicators in the ARAP database for tracking ARAP include: grievance received, whether the include: the sources and individual compensation; mechanisms; stakeholder affected populations who amounts of funding for and (ii) the payment of channels; and Information preferred cash various RAP activities etc compensation for loss of dissemination activities. compensation to in-kind land or assets. resettlement assistance
The scope of each type of monitoring is briefly described in the following sections and in Table 9.1 along with the staffing, and resources needed for the monitoring program. In to effectively report on the effectiveness of the ARAP implementation, the EMUS/MCC will monitor the following key indicators: timely disbursement of compensation; compensation disbursement to the entitled parties; public consultation and grievance procedures in place and functioning; and Physical progress of resettlement and rehabilitation, where applicable. Monitoring will be based on indicators of change in: delivery of compensation, resolution of grievances, social stability, and human and environmental health Performance Indicators will include the following: The number and categories of affected people compensated Adherence to compensation implementation schedule Cases of complaints received, number resolved and number outstanding Accuracy in records of payments made The EMUS/MPW will provide feedback on ARAP implementation and ensure that adverse impacts on affected people are mitigated in a timely manner. M&E will be the main mechanism to alert project management of any delays and problems and will help measure the extent to which the main objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved. M&E activities will be supplemented and verified by monitoring efforts of experts specialized in resettlement issues or a government agency with the same function. The establishment of appropriate indicators in the ARAP is essential since what is measured is what will be considered important. Key performance indicators for monitoring are commonly divided into four categories as follows: 12 A: Key performance indicators Input: Output: Process: Outcome Indicators include the resources in terms of people, equipment and materials that go into the ARAP. Examples of indicators in the ARAP include: the sources and amounts of funding for various RAP activities etc Indicators concern the activities and services, which are produced with the inputs. Examples of output indicators in the ARAP include (i) a database for tracking individual compensation; and (ii) the payment of compensation for loss of land or assets. Indicators represent the change in the quality and quantity of access and coverage of the activities and services. Examples of process indicators in the ARAP include: grievance mechanisms; stakeholder channels; and Information dissemination activities. Indicators include the delivery of compensation and other mitigation for impacts caused by the project. They measure compensation paid and received, whether the affected populations who preferred cash compensation to in-kind resettlement assistance
RP9900RP0P1156001B0AFR0RAP0P115664.docx