Vendors’ vested interest in a particular domain (if sufficient it provides a scope for introducing component features relevant to that domain) Contract practice (guarantees given, and obligations vendor is prepared to take on) 3. SDLC vs. COTS SDLC COTS Common/Difference Requirements Analysis Common. In both methods Systems Investigation Systems Requirements requirements should be Software Requirements identified & documented. Preliminary Design Survey of COTS Common. Both methods products and use drawings to determine preliminary evaluation the software design. Analysis Evaluation of COTS Different. Design Modification to Different. requirements Coding Procurement of COTS Different. and customization Testing of the code Testing of customized Common. system Launch Implementation Common. The launch process in both methods Integration includes integration and Maintenance maintenance. 4. Agile vs. COTS Agile COTS Common/Difference Display models in Candidate vendors are Different. public presented to the Board Evaluation of COTS Different. Model to understand and communicate Agree & follow a Authorization of MEPP Common. common set of modeling and VMP Any team member can Decisions should be Different. modify any made by the team Seek stakeholders for MEPP and VMP Common. active participation 5. The benefits of MEPP and VMP: Helping understand the problem as well as the proposed solutions Motivating the project team by having the Board involved in the project Discovering flaws and errors before implementing the project Receiving the Board’s recommendations that could improve the solution
Vendors’ vested interest in a particular domain (if sufficient it provides a scope for introducing component features relevant to that domain) Contract practice (guarantees given, and obligations vendor is prepared to take on) 3. SDLC vs. COTS SDLC COTS Common/Difference Systems Investigation Requirements Analysis Common. In both methods requirements should be identified & documented. Systems Requirements Software Requirements Preliminary Design Survey of COTS products and preliminary evaluation Common. Both methods use drawings to determine the software design. Analysis Evaluation of COTS Different. Design Modification to requirements Different. Coding Procurement of COTS and customization Different. Testing of the code Testing of customized system Common. Launch Implementation Common. The launch process in both methods includes integration and maintenance. Integration Maintenance 4. Agile vs. COTS Agile COTS Common/Difference Display models in public Candidate vendors are presented to the Board Different. Model to understand and communicate Evaluation of COTS Different. Agree & follow a common set of modeling Authorization of MEPP and VMP Common. Any team member can modify any Decisions should be made by the team Different. Seek stakeholders for active participation MEPP and VMP Common. 5. The benefits of MEPP and VMP: Helping understand the problem as well as the proposed solutions Motivating the project team by having the Board involved in the project Discovering flaws and errors before implementing the project Receiving the Board’s recommendations that could improve the solution
solution-manual-project-management-1st-edition-vaidyanathan.docx