Please indicate which of the CanMEDS-FM /CanMEDs roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity (Collaborator, Communicator, Family Medicine Expert / Medical Expert, Health Advocate, Leader, Professional, Scholar) Did you perceive any degree of bias in any of the program? (No, Yes - Please identify:________) Can you identify any barriers to incorporating what you learned into your practice? The learning objectives of the overall program and specific sessions were met (Strongly Strongly disagree) What learning will you integrate into your practise? Describe the CanMeds roles/competencies for the overall activity and specific sessions as well as how they will be addressed: Program Overall Specific Sessions Please highlight the keywords most relevant to your program from the list below Aboriginal health Family/general Ophthalmology Academic medicine practice/primary care Orthopedic surgery Addiction medicine Gastroenterology Pain management Administration General surgery Palliative care Adolescent medicine Genetics Pathology Allergy Geriatric medicine/care of Patients Allied health professionals the elderly Pediatrics Alternative/complementary Global health Pharmacology medicine Gynecology Pharmacy Anesthesia and analgesia Health economics Preventive medicine sciences Health policy Prison medicine Behavioural science Hematology Psychiatry Cancer care History Psychotherapy/counseling Cardiovascular medicine Homecare Public health Cardiovascular surgery Hospitalist care Radiation therapy Child Abuse Imaging techniques Radiology Chiropractic medicine Immunology Rehabilitation medicine Chronic disease management Infectious disease Religion/spirituality Clinical practice International medicine Research methods guidelines Laboratory medicine Respiratory medicine Communication Legal/medico-legal Rheumatology Community medicine Lifestyle medicine Critical care Management Sexual health and medicine Culture Medical careers Sociology Dentistry/oral medicine Medical education Sports and exercise Dermatology Medical informatics medicine Diabetes Medical students and Statistics Domestic Violence residents Surgery Drugs Men’s health Thoracic surgery Emergency medicine Molecular medicine Toxicology Endocrinology Nephrology Transplant medicine ENT Neurology Travel medicine Environmental medicine Neurosurgery Tropical medicine Epidemiology Nuclear medicine Urology Ethics Nursing Vaccines Evidence-based medicine Nutrition and metabolism Vascular surgery Faculty Development Obstetrics Women’s health Forensic medicine Occupation/industrial medicine Oncology CFPC Quality Criteria Quality Criteria 1: Needs Assessment and Practice Relevance
Please indicate which of the CanMEDS-FM /CanMEDs roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity (Collaborator, Communicator, Family Medicine Expert / Medical Expert, Health Advocate, Leader, Professional, Scholar) Did you perceive any degree of bias in any of the program? (No, Yes - Please identify:________) Can you identify any barriers to incorporating what you learned into your practice? The learning objectives of the overall program and specific sessions were met (Strongly Strongly disagree) What learning will you integrate into your practise? Describe the CanMeds roles/competencies for the overall activity and specific sessions as well as how they will be addressed: Overall Program Specific Sessions Please highlight the keywords most relevant to your program from the list below Aboriginal health Academic medicine Addiction medicine Administration Adolescent medicine Allergy Allied health professionals Alternative/complementary medicine Anesthesia and analgesia sciences Behavioural science Cancer care Cardiovascular medicine Cardiovascular surgery Child Abuse Chiropractic medicine Chronic disease management Clinical practice guidelines Communication Community medicine Critical care Culture Dentistry/oral medicine Dermatology Diabetes Domestic Violence Drugs Emergency medicine Endocrinology ENT Environmental medicine Epidemiology Ethics Evidence-based medicine Faculty Development Forensic medicine Family/general practice/primary care Gastroenterology General surgery Genetics Geriatric medicine/care of the elderly Global health Gynecology Health economics Health policy Hematology History Homecare Hospitalist care Imaging techniques Immunology Infectious disease International medicine Laboratory medicine Legal/medico-legal Lifestyle Management Medical careers Medical education Medical informatics Medical students and residents Men’s health Molecular medicine Nephrology Neurology Neurosurgery Nuclear medicine Nursing Nutrition and metabolism Obstetrics Occupation/industrial medicine Oncology Ophthalmology Orthopedic surgery Pain management Palliative care Pathology Patients Pediatrics Pharmacology Pharmacy Preventive medicine Prison medicine Psychiatry Psychotherapy/counseling Public health Radiation therapy Radiology Rehabilitation medicine Religion/spirituality Research methods Respiratory medicine Rheumatology medicine Sexual health and medicine Sociology Sports and exercise medicine Statistics Surgery Thoracic surgery Toxicology Transplant medicine Travel medicine Tropical medicine Urology Vaccines Vascular surgery Women’s health CFPC Quality Criteria Quality Criteria 1: Needs Assessment and Practice Relevance
1_CertificationAccreditationApplication_CFPC%20Updated.docx