Appendix 4 Evidence Profile THERAPY TARGETING ANGER CBT- based Individual Study Participants who received the intervention showed significantly more improvement Study Author’s & Year Shea, Lambert & Reddy, 2013 Design RCT with three month follow-up Intervention (I) and Comparison (C) I: Cognitive behavioural intervention C: Supportive intervention US veterans (OEF/OIF) Population Mean age (SD)1 Mean age: 36.3 (10.2) Gender % Gender: Male Delivered to Individual Dosage (total number of sessions) Twelve weekly 75 minute sessions Primary Outcome domain (Measure(s)) - Anger (OAS-M; STAXI-2) Secondary Outcome domain (Measure(s)) - PTSD (CAPS) - DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I/P W/PSY) - Anger (DAR7) - Outcomes (OQ) N= 25 Total sample size n= 12 12 Participants: I Participants: C n= 11 than controls on the STAXI-2 Anger Expression Index (p=.019), and improvement approached significance on the OAS-M aggression scale (p <.06). There was significantly more improvement for the intervention group on the DAR compared to controls (p=.027). At follow-up, changes for the intervention group were maintained, and on some scales scores had decreased further (STAXI-2 AX and Expression Out,
Appendix 4 Evidence Profile THERAPY TARGETING ANGER CBT- based Individual Study Author’s & Year Shea, Lambert & Reddy, 2013 Design RCT with three month follow-up Intervention (I) and Comparison (C) I: Cognitive behavioural intervention C: Supportive intervention Population Mean age (SD)1 Gender % US veterans (OEF/OIF) Mean age: 36.3 (10.2) Gender: Male Delivered to Individual Dosage (total number of sessions) Twelve weekly 75 minute sessions Primary Outcome domain (Measure(s)) - Anger (OAS-M; STAXI-2) Secondary Outcome domain (Measure(s)) - PTSD (CAPS) - DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I/P W/PSY) - Anger (DAR7) - Outcomes (OQ) Total sample size N= 25 Participants: I n= 12 12 Participants: C n= 11 Study Participants who received the intervention showed significantly more improvement than controls on the STAXI-2 Anger Expression Index (p=.019), and improvement approached significance on the OAS-M aggression scale (p <.06). There was significantly more improvement for the intervention group on the DAR compared to controls (p=.027). At follow-up, changes for the intervention group were maintained, and on some scales scores had decreased further (STAXI-2 AX and Expression Out,
Question%205%20-%20Anger%20-%20Technical%20Report%20November%202016_0.docx