4 No loss of agricultural land from Loss is for 6 months or longer. – probable” scenario. “most Effectiveness of zoning should ideally be 3 <2.5% of agricultural land at risk independently validated (see also Essential 2). – from probable” scenario. “most 2 2.5-5% of agricultural land at risk – from probable” scenario. “most 1 5-7.5% of agricultural land at risk – from probable” scenario. “most 0 - >7.5% of agricultural land at risk from probable” scenario. “most 4.1.2 Economic activity at % of employment at risk 5 No loss of employment from Employment is at risk from damage to – “most risk. severe” scenario. farmland, factories, offices, and so on. 4 No loss of employment from Loss is for 3 months or longer. – “most probable” scenario Effectiveness of zoning should ideally be 3 <2.5% of employment at risk from independently validated (see also Essential 2). – probable” scenario “most 2 2.5-5% of employment at risk from – probable” scenario “most 1 5-7.5% of employment risk from – probable” scenario “most 0 - >7.5% of employment at risk from probable” scenario “most % of business output at risk 5 No loss of business output from Business output measured in financial terms. – severe” scenario. This assessment also includes loss through “most business being forced to relocate elsewhere, 4 No loss of business output from even if only temporarily, due to loss of – premises or facilities, loss of markets, loss of probable” scenario. “most
4 – No loss of agricultural land from “most probable” scenario. 3 – <2.5% of agricultural land at risk from “most probable” scenario. 2 – 2.5-5% of agricultural land at risk from “most probable” scenario. 1 – 5-7.5% of agricultural land at risk from “most probable” scenario. 0 - >7.5% of agricultural land at risk from “most probable” scenario. Loss is for 6 months or longer. Effectiveness of zoning should ideally be independently validated (see also Essential 2). 4.1.2 Economic activity at risk. % of employment at risk 5 – No loss of employment from “most severe” scenario. 4 – No loss of employment from “most probable” scenario 3 – <2.5% of employment at risk from “most probable” scenario 2 – 2.5-5% of employment at risk from “most probable” scenario 1 – 5-7.5% of employment risk from “most probable” scenario 0 - >7.5% of employment at risk from “most probable” scenario Employment is at risk from damage to farmland, factories, offices, and so on. Loss is for 3 months or longer. Effectiveness of zoning should ideally be independently validated (see also Essential 2). % of business output at risk 5 – No loss of business output from “most severe” scenario. 4 – No loss of business output from “most probable” scenario. Business output measured in financial terms. This assessment also includes loss through business being forced to relocate elsewhere, even if only temporarily, due to loss of premises or facilities, loss of markets, loss of
Resilience%20Scorecard%20Updated%20V2%20-%20April%2030th%202015.docx