OAS-M). Overall, participants in both groups rated themselves as being satisfied with treatment that they received. Group Study 1 Study 2 3 Author’s & Year Marshall et al., 2010 Morland et al., Strom et al., 2013 2010 Design Single group RCT with six Single group pre-post with one month follow-up month- follow-up Intervention (I) I: Anger I1: I: CBT for driving-related anger and management anger and aggression Comparison (C) treatment management I2: In-person anger management Population US Veterans (76% US veterans (76% US veterans (56% Vietnam war) Mean age (SD)1 Vietnam) Vietnam war) Mean age: 48.2 (15.3) Gender % Mean age: 55 (8.22) In person: Gender: Male Gender: Male Mean age: 54.7 (9.7) Videoconference: Mean age = 54.8 (SD=9.3) Gender: Male Delivered to Group
OAS-M). Overall, participants in both groups rated themselves as being satisfied with treatment that they received. Group Study 1 Study 2 3 Author’s & Year Marshall et al., 2010 Morland et al., 2010 Strom et al., 2013 Design Single group RCT with six month follow-up Single group pre-post with one month- follow-up Intervention (I) and Comparison (C) I: Anger management treatment I1: anger management I2: In-person anger management I: CBT for driving-related anger and aggression Population Mean age (SD)1 Gender % US Veterans (76% Vietnam) Mean age: 55 (8.22) Gender: Male US veterans (76% Vietnam war) In person: Mean age: 54.7 (9.7) Videoconference: Mean age = 54.8 (SD=9.3) Gender: Male US veterans (56% Vietnam war) Mean age: 48.2 (15.3) Gender: Male Delivered to Group
Question%205%20-%20Anger%20-%20Technical%20Report%20November%202016_0.docx