alleged violation. is the default voting harms in reasonable threshold. detail. Who would represent A template will be the GNSO? developed that provides Who would pay for guidance for what should representation? appear in the motion. How would a claim that Specifically, it would state, is supported by the “"The claim shall state the GNSO be put forward? basis for the dispute and Such details could be in the the harms in reasonable form of a separate guideline detail." which eventually are to be added to the GNSO Operating Procedures? 4.3(j) ICANN shall, in Decisions to approve the No new procedures or Assumptions: consultation with SO/ACs, nominated panelist shall be changes to the GNSO The process for initiate a four-step process presented to Council for Operating Procedures nominating a slate of to establish the [IRP] approval by a majority of and/or ICANN Bylaws. The proposed panel Standing Panel … [SO/ACs] each House decision to nominate a members will be shall nominate a slate of slate of proposed panel carried out by the proposed panel members members will be put GNSO Standing from the well-qualified before the GNSO Council Selection Committee. candidates identified per as a motion for the process set forth in consideration. Threshold Section 4.3(j)(ii)(B). for approval is a simple majority vote of each 4.3(k) The Claimant and house, which per Section ICANN shall each select 11.3-I of the ICANN Bylaws one panelist from the is the default voting Standing Panel, and the threshold. two panelists selected by the parties will select the third panelist from the Standing Panel.
alleged violation. is the default voting threshold. A template will be developed that provides guidance for what should appear in the motion. Specifically, it would state, “"The claim shall state the basis for the dispute and the harms in reasonable detail." harms in reasonable detail. Who would represent the GNSO? Who would pay for representation? How would a claim that is supported by the GNSO be put forward? Such details could be in the form of a separate guideline which eventually are to be added to the GNSO Operating Procedures? 4.3(j) ICANN shall, in consultation with SO/ACs, initiate a four-step process to establish the [IRP] Standing Panel … [SO/ACs] shall nominate a slate of proposed panel members from the well-qualified candidates identified per the process set forth in Section 4.3(j)(ii)(B). 4.3(k) The Claimant and ICANN shall each select one panelist from the Standing Panel, and the two panelists selected by the parties will select the third panelist from the Standing Panel. Decisions to approve the nominated panelist shall be presented to Council for approval by a majority of each House No new procedures or changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures and/or ICANN Bylaws. The decision to nominate a slate of proposed panel members will be put before the GNSO Council as a motion for consideration. Threshold for approval is a simple majority vote of each house, which per Section 11.3-I of the ICANN Bylaws is the default voting threshold. Assumptions: The process for nominating a slate of proposed panel members will be carried out by the GNSO Standing Selection Committee.
proposed-revisions-gnso-op-procedures-bylaws-staff-report-docx-16may17-en.docx