4.3(n) An IRP Implementation Oversight Team shall be established in consultation with SO/ACs and comprised of members of the global Internet community to develop clear, published rules for the IRP. 4.6 SPECIFIC REVIEWS Each GNSO No new procedures or Assumptions: (a) Review teams will be Constituency/Stakeholder changes to the GNSO The process for established for each Group may nominate 1 Operating Procedures nominating up to seven applicable review, which candidate. (7 candidates and/or ICANN Bylaws. The prospective members will include both a limited for GNSO) decision to nominate up to of the review team will number of members and seven prospective be carried out by the an open number of members for the review GNSO Standing observers. The chairs of Decisions to approve the 21 team will be put before Selection Committee. SO/ACs shall select a total review team members the GNSO Council as a The Council may group of up to 21 review shall be presented to motion for consideration. provide guidance to team members from Council for approval by a Threshold for approval is a GNSO Chair for among the prospective majority of each House. simple majority vote of priorities and criteria in members nominated by each house, which per selecting from SO/ACs, balanced for Section 11.3-I of the ICANN nominees to fill open diversity and skill: Bylaws is the default review team slots. (A)Each SSO/AC may voting threshold. nominate up to seven prospective members for the review team; (B)Any SO/AC nominating one, two or three prospective review team members shall be entitled to have those one, two or three nominees selected as
4.3(n) An IRP Implementation Oversight Team shall be established in consultation with SO/ACs and comprised of members of the global Internet community to develop clear, published rules for the IRP. 4.6 SPECIFIC REVIEWS (a) Review teams will be established for each applicable review, which will include both a limited number of members and an open number of observers. The chairs of SO/ACs shall select a group of up to 21 review team members from among the prospective members nominated by SO/ACs, balanced for diversity and skill: (A)Each SSO/AC may nominate up to seven prospective members for the review team; (B)Any SO/AC nominating one, two or three prospective review team members shall be entitled to have those one, two or three nominees selected as Each GNSO Constituency/Stakeholder Group may nominate 1 candidate. (7 candidates for GNSO) Decisions to approve the 21 total review team members shall be presented to Council for approval by a majority of each House. No new procedures or changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures and/or ICANN Bylaws. The decision to nominate up to seven prospective members for the review team will be put before the GNSO Council as a motion for consideration. Threshold for approval is a simple majority vote of each house, which per Section 11.3-I of the ICANN Bylaws is the default voting threshold. Assumptions: The process for nominating up to seven prospective members of the review team will be carried out by the GNSO Standing Selection Committee. The Council may provide guidance to GNSO Chair for priorities and criteria in selecting from nominees to fill open review team slots.
proposed-revisions-gnso-op-procedures-bylaws-staff-report-docx-16may17-en.docx