Review of expenditure Previous Academic Year Quality of teaching for all Desired outcome Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the Lessons learned Cost action/approach success criteria? Include impact on (and whether you will continue with this approach) pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Improve attention, One to one/small In June 2017 year 1 PP children made Continue this approach next year. £41509 concentration and group tuition better progress than non PP children in memory. (including phonics, reading, writing and maths. maths interventions). In June 2017 87% of year 1 PP children passed phonics screen test. WOW days and In June 2017 year 2 PP children made subsidising class better progress than non PP children in trips. reading and writing. In June 2017 48% of PP children achieved GLD. SALT interventions. One to one/small In June 2017 year 1 PP children made Continue this approach next year. £5000 group tuition. better progress than non PP children in reading, writing and maths. In June 2017 87% of year 1 PP children passed phonics screen test. In June 2017 year 2 PP children made better progress than non PP children in reading and writing. In June 2017 48% of PP children achieved GLD. Targeted support Desired outcome Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the Lessons learned Cost action/approach success criteria? Include impact on (and whether you will continue with this approach) pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Improve self-esteem, Pastoral support. In June 2017 year 1 PP children made Continue this approach next year. £5620 confidence. better progress than non PP children in reading, writing and maths. In June 2017 year 2 PP children made better progress than non PP children in reading and writing.
Review of expenditure Previous Academic Year Quality of teaching for all Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost Improve attention, concentration and memory. One to one/small group tuition (including phonics, maths interventions). WOW days and subsidising class trips. In June 2017 year 1 PP children made better progress than non PP children in reading, writing and maths. In June 2017 87% of year 1 PP children passed phonics screen test. In June 2017 year 2 PP children made better progress than non PP children in reading and writing. In June 2017 48% of PP children achieved GLD. Continue this approach next year. £41509 SALT interventions. One to one/small group tuition. In June 2017 year 1 PP children made better progress than non PP children in reading, writing and maths. In June 2017 87% of year 1 PP children passed phonics screen test. In June 2017 year 2 PP children made better progress than non PP children in reading and writing. In June 2017 48% of PP children achieved GLD. Continue this approach next year. £5000 Targeted support Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost Improve self-esteem, confidence. Pastoral support. In June 2017 year 1 PP children made better progress than non PP children in reading, writing and maths. In June 2017 year 2 PP children made better progress than non PP children in reading and writing. Continue this approach next year. £5620
Pupil-premium-strategy-draft-4-9.9.17.docx