and all references in 10 point font] REFERENCES [‘REFERENCES’ Toulmin, S. E. (1958). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. The uses of argument. Benoit, W. L. (1989). Attorney argumentation and Supreme Court opinions. Argumentation and Advocacy, 22-38. 26, Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1993b). The history of the argumentum ad hominem since the seventeenth century. In E. C. W. Krabbe, R. J. Dalitz & P. A. Smit (Eds.), Empirical Logic and (pp. 49-68). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Public Debate. Essays in Honour of Else M. Barth
REFERENCES [‘REFERENCES’ and all references in 10 point font] Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Benoit, W. L. (1989). Attorney argumentation and Supreme Court opinions. Argumentation and Advocacy, 26, 22-38. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1993b). The history of the argumentum ad hominem since the seventeenth century. In E. C. W. Krabbe, R. J. Dalitz & P. A. Smit (Eds.), Empirical Logic and Public Debate. Essays in Honour of Else M. Barth (pp. 49-68). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
practical_template.docx