12 TL Ch. 455+040 to Ch. DBM (VG-40) job mix BAEL/PRJ/ CLOSED 455+890 (R/S) formula is not in the line of dated Vide letter overlay MCW & assumptions made in 21.01.2016 no. Ch.453+440 to Ch. pavement design with 453+535 (R/S) regards to Va&Vb as per widening MCW IRC:37:2012 13 TL Ch. 515+290 to DBM (VG-40) job mix BAEL/PRJ/ CLOSED 515+520 (LHS) formula is not in the line of dated Vide letter assumptions made in 14.10.2015 no. pavement design with regards to Va&Vb as per IRC:37:2012 14 TL Ch. 515+320 to Improper laying of kerb due BAEL/PRJ/ CLOSED 515+340 (LHS)-Road to which DBM layer has 1083 dated Vide letter Separator side covered the entire thickness 22.09.2015 no. of L-portion of the Kerb. (Dismantled) Re-laid on dated 24.09.2015 15 TL Ch. 451+500 to Required thickness of DBM BAEL/PRJ/ CLOSED 452+000 (LHS)-MCW as per Pavement Design is Vide letter overlaying 85mm, but laying thickness 05.03.2016 no. of DBM is less than required. 16 TL Ch. 515+300 to Poor quality and improper BAEL/PRJ/ CLOSED 515+650 (RHS)-MCW thickness of Bituminous Vide letter Concrete 05.03.2016 no. 17 TL Ch. 465+200 to WMM mixed with BAEL/PRJ/ CLOSED 465+320 (LHS) unapproved material slag dated Vide letter widening portion (crushed slag) 21.01.2016 no. 18 TL Ch. 472+900 to Inadequate safety measures BAEL/PRJ/ CLOSED 473+700 (RHS) [VUP can threat to traffic dated Vide letter at Km. 473+340 and movement at the road inner 22.01.2016 its approach on both edge which may lead to side] major accident
12 TL Vide letter no. Ch. 455+040 to Ch. 455+890 (R/S) overlay MCW & Ch.453+440 to Ch. 453+535 (R/S) widening MCW DBM (VG-40) job mix formula is not in the line of assumptions made in pavement design with regards to Va&Vb as per IRC:37:2012 BAEL/PRJ/ dated 21.01.2016 CLOSED 13 TL Vide letter no. Ch. 515+290 to 515+520 (LHS) DBM (VG-40) job mix formula is not in the line of assumptions made in pavement design with regards to Va&Vb as per IRC:37:2012 BAEL/PRJ/ dated 14.10.2015 CLOSED 14 TL Vide letter no. Ch. 515+320 to 515+340 (LHS)-Road Separator side Improper laying of kerb due to which DBM layer has covered the entire thickness of L-portion of the Kerb. BAEL/PRJ/ 1083 dated 22.09.2015 (Dismantled) Re-laid on dated 24.09.2015 CLOSED 15 TL Vide letter no. Ch. 451+500 to 452+000 (LHS)-MCW overlaying Required thickness of DBM as per Pavement Design is 85mm, but laying thickness of DBM is less than required. BAEL/PRJ/ 05.03.2016 CLOSED 16 TL Vide letter no. Ch. 515+300 to 515+650 (RHS)-MCW Poor quality and improper thickness of Bituminous Concrete BAEL/PRJ/ 05.03.2016 CLOSED 17 TL Vide letter no. Ch. 465+200 to 465+320 (LHS) widening portion WMM mixed with unapproved material slag (crushed slag) BAEL/PRJ/ dated 21.01.2016 CLOSED 18 TL Vide letter Ch. 472+900 to 473+700 (RHS) [VUP at Km. 473+340 and its approach on both side] Inadequate safety measures can threat to traffic movement at the road inner edge which may lead to major accident BAEL/PRJ/ dated 22.01.2016 CLOSED
QUARTERLY%20PROGRESS%20REPORT%20JULY%20-%20SETEMBER-2016.docx