KRA 2: Core Criterion 1: Program Approval and PS1a - Program Student and faculty Quality of Teaching Indicator: Implementation - The institution’s Approval performance toward the and Learning Setting and process for approving and PS1b - Setting of desired competencies of Achieving implementing programs ensure that Objectives and Learning graduates Program programs: 1) are aligned to the Outcomes Dynamic learning Standards HEI’s VMG as expressed in the PS1c - Mechanisms for environment desired competencies for its Effective Delivery of Stakeholder satisfaction graduates; 2) consider the risks Programs and Academic Relevant and responsive related to needed resources, Support academic programs potential market, etc.; 3) are PS1d - Matching of effectively implemented to achieve Abilities and Aptitudes the intended outcomes; and 4) contribute to the development needs of the region/country. Criterion 2: Program Monitoring and PS2 - Monitoring and Programs that are current, Review - The institution’s effective Review relevant, coherent, and arrangements for monitoring and sustainable reviewing contribute to the Improved teaching and effectiveness of its programs. learning Improved student performance (e.g. licensure examination, passing rate, employment rate, and opportunities) Criterion 3: Action to Strengthen PS3 - Action to Ideal student performance Programs - The institution’s Strengthen Programs towards desired programs are continuously competencies improved through effective actions that address weakness, on strengths, and enhance student and faculty performance.
KRA 2: Quality of Teaching and Learning Core Indicator: Setting and Achieving Program Standards Criterion 1: Program Approval and Implementation - The institution’s process for approving and implementing programs ensure that programs: 1) are aligned to the HEI’s VMG as expressed in the desired competencies for its graduates; 2) consider the risks related to needed resources, potential market, etc.; 3) are effectively implemented to achieve the intended outcomes; and 4) contribute to the development needs of the region/country. PS1a - Program Approval PS1b - Setting of Objectives and Learning Outcomes PS1c - Mechanisms for Effective Delivery of Programs and Academic Support PS1d - Matching of Abilities and Aptitudes Student and faculty performance toward the desired competencies of graduates Dynamic learning environment Stakeholder satisfaction Relevant and responsive academic programs Criterion 2: Program Monitoring and Review - The institution’s effective arrangements for monitoring and reviewing contribute to the effectiveness of its programs. PS2 - Monitoring and Review Programs that are current, relevant, coherent, and sustainable Improved teaching and learning Improved student performance (e.g. licensure examination, passing rate, employment rate, and opportunities) Criterion 3: Action to Strengthen Programs - The institution’s programs are continuously improved through effective actions that address weakness, on strengths, and enhance student and faculty performance. PS3 - Action to Strengthen Programs Ideal student performance towards desired competencies
Revised-ISA-SED_Final-Version_April-2017.docx