Study 2 Summary Author Reported Main Findings: There were no differences between the DVD and live groups on MICA, ERMIS or RIBS scores. The DVD group had higher SCILO (knowledge) scores. The combined Study 3 social contact group Author’s & et al., (DVD/live) had better 2010 MICA and RIBS scores Design Pre-post than the lecture group, Intervention I: Educational (I), campaign with the latter difference facilitator (short version) maintained at 4 months. C1: Educational The DVD was the most film with facilitator (long version) cost effective of the C2: Educational interventions, and the campaign (live presentation) live session the most popular. SD: 7.7 15% male Comparison (C), & (G) Intervention I: Our Own “In program Delivery methods, facilitated by one frequency, individual recovering from duration
SD: 7.7 15% male Study 2 Summary Author Reported Main Findings: There were no differences between the DVD and live groups on MICA, ERMIS or RIBS scores. The DVD group had higher SCILO (knowledge) scores. The combined social contact group (DVD/live) had better MICA and RIBS scores than the lecture group, the latter difference maintained at 4 months. The DVD was the most cost effective of the interventions, and the live session the most popular. Study 3 Author’s & et al., 2010 Design Pre-post Intervention (I), Comparison (C), & (G) I: Educational campaign with facilitator (short version) C1: Educational film with facilitator (long version) C2: Educational campaign (live presentation) Intervention Delivery methods, frequency, duration I: “In Our Own program facilitated by one individual recovering from
Question%201%20-%20Stigma%20-%20Technical%20Report%20November%202016_0.docx