Assessment of Satisfactory Conceded Satisfactory Requires Review Progress: (Please tick) Definitions Progress is satisfactory Progress is less than Progress is less than and candidate is on expected for expected without a track to complete substantive reason(s) substantive reason thesis/exegesis/creative that have been and the candidate is work by submission addressed and progress to be placed Under date is expected to improve Review as per Primary Advisor Name: Name: Name: Signature Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: AIMS Primary Name: Name: Name: Advisor Signature Signature: Signature: Signature: (AIMS@JCU only) Date: Date: Date: Secondary Name: Name: Advisor Signature Not required Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Secondary Name: Name: Advisor Signature Not required Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Advisor Mentor Name: Name: Signature Not required Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Explanatory Yes - must outline why Yes - The Advisory Statement Not required situation has arisen and Panel must provide a Required? measures in place. If the statement when Candidate and Advisors placing a HDR agree, a single candidate Under statement signed by Review both may be supplied. If no agreement between the Candidate and Advisors, consult the College Dean in the first instance. Candidate Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: If progress is “Conceded Satisfactory” or “Requires Review” please return to your College HDR Academic Services Officer to obtain the ADRE signature. If “Satisfactory” please send to the Graduate Research School at grs@jcu.edu.au Associate Dean Research Education signature I have considered the recommendation and comments above and where applicable, make the comments and/or recommend the actions below. Signature: Date: Comments or actions if applicable:
Assessment of Progress: (Please tick) Satisfactory Conceded Satisfactory Requires Review Definitions Progress is satisfactory and candidate is on track to complete thesis/exegesis/creative work by submission date Progress is less than expected for substantive reason(s) that have been addressed and progress is expected to improve Progress is less than expected without a substantive reason and the candidate is to be placed Under Review as per Primary Advisor Signature Name: Signature: Date: Name: Signature: Date: Name: Signature: Date: AIMS Primary Advisor Signature (AIMS@JCU only) Name: Signature: Date: Name: Signature: Date: Name: Signature: Date: Secondary Advisor Signature Not required Name: Signature: Date: Name: Signature: Date: Secondary Advisor Signature Not required Name: Signature: Date: Name: Signature: Date: Advisor Mentor Signature Not required Name: Signature: Date: Name: Signature: Date: Explanatory Statement Required? Not required Yes - must outline why situation has arisen and measures in place. If the Candidate and Advisors agree, a single statement signed by both may be supplied. If no agreement between the Candidate and Advisors, consult the College Dean in the first instance. Yes - The Advisory Panel must provide a statement when placing a HDR candidate Under Review Candidate Name: Signature: Date: Name: Signature: Date: Name: Signature: Date: If progress is “Conceded Satisfactory” or “Requires Review” please return to your College HDR Academic Services Officer to obtain the ADRE signature. If “Satisfactory” please send to the Graduate Research School at grs@jcu.edu.au Associate Dean Research Education signature I have considered the recommendation and comments above and where applicable, make the comments and/or recommend the actions below. Signature: Date: Comments or actions if applicable:
PRO_FORM_01.docx