context or specific local settings include organisational factors (e.g. availability of trained staff) and cultural factors (e.g. attitudes to health issues, including those that may affect compliance). 4 3 2 1 Directly applicable Applicable to the Applicable to the Not applicable to to the Australian Australian context Australian context with the Australian context with few caveats some caveats context Ranking the evidence On balance, this next step takes into account the considerations of the strength of the evidence (quantity and risk of bias, quantity of evidence and level of evidence), consistency, generalisability and applicability. The total body of the evidence is then ranked into one of four categories: ‘Supported’, ‘Promising’, and Supported’ (see Figure 1). Agreement on ranking is sought ‘Unknown’ ‘Not between all three independent raters. Figure 1: Categories within the intervention ranking system SUPPORTED PROMISING UNKNOWN NOT SUPPORTED consistent Evidence Insufficient evidence of suggestive of evidence of Clear, consistent beneficial effect beneficial effect beneficial effect evidence of no but further and further effect or negative research required research is / harmful effect required Results
context or specific local settings include organisational factors (e.g. availability of trained staff) and cultural factors (e.g. attitudes to health issues, including those that may affect compliance). 4 3 2 1 Directly applicable to the Australian context Applicable to the Australian context with few caveats Applicable to the Australian context with some caveats Not applicable to the Australian context Ranking the evidence On balance, this next step takes into account the considerations of the strength of the evidence (quantity and risk of bias, quantity of evidence and level of evidence), consistency, generalisability and applicability. The total body of the evidence is then ranked into one of four categories: ‘Supported’, ‘Promising’, ‘Unknown’ and ‘Not Supported’ (see Figure 1). Agreement on ranking is sought between all three independent raters. Figure 1: Categories within the intervention ranking system SUPPORTED consistent evidence of beneficial effect PROMISING Evidence suggestive of beneficial effect but further research required UNKNOWN Insufficient evidence of beneficial effect and further research is required NOT SUPPORTED Clear, consistent evidence of no effect or negative / harmful effect Results
Question%209%20-%20Moral%20Injury%20-%20Technical%20Report%20November%202016_0.docx