type is effective in increasing the English language proficiency level of ELLs. Combined, the data are intended to show what conclusions can be made for whether a program type is best meeting the needs of ELLs and the district. Table 4: Program Demographics # Served # Served by through SEI # Served # Served by Transitional # Not Served in # Identified ELL (ESL and through other program Students sheltered Dual Bilingual an ELE program type content Language Education instruction) Pre-K K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 secondary
type is effective in increasing the English language proficiency level of ELLs. Combined, the data are intended to show what conclusions can be made for whether a program type is best meeting the needs of ELLs and the district. Table 4: Program Demographics # Identified ELL Students # Served through SEI (ESL and sheltered content instruction) # Served through Dual Language # Served by Transitional Bilingual Education # Served by other program type # Not Served in an ELE program Pre-K K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 secondary
ProgramEvaluation.docx