conceptual site model or assessment criteria sourced from the ASC NEPM or other more pertinent guidance. As a guide, it is anticipated that the evaluation of the adequacy of the CLID statement with respect to the auditor’s extent of contamination might require a statement of up to [x] pages length in a relatively simple case, more than [y] pages in a very complex case and perhaps [z] pages in a case of intermediate complexity. In accordance with the code of professional conduct, where the certification relies on a support auditor’s auditor’s report, the certification is to: expert’s auditor’s clearly identify and reference the matters for which the auditor is relying on the report; support expert’s and annex the report. support expert’s It is the responsibility to confirm the adequacy of the information on which he or she relies in forming an auditor’s opinion about the CLID. Consequently, the auditor must accept responsibility for any conclusions underpinning the certification and hence must not either qualify their responsibility for their conclusions or set auditor’s limitations on who may rely on the soundness of their conclusions. It is appropriate, however, that the auditor identifies any relevant uncertainties about the assessment of the site or the effectiveness of proposed management measures as well as any related implications.
conceptual site model or assessment criteria sourced from the ASC NEPM or other more pertinent guidance. As a guide, it is anticipated that the auditor’s evaluation of the adequacy of the CLID statement with respect to the extent of contamination might require a statement of up to [x] pages length in a relatively simple case, more than [y] pages in a very complex case and perhaps [z] pages in a case of intermediate complexity. In accordance with the auditor’s code of professional conduct, where the auditor’s certification relies on a support expert’s report, the auditor’s certification is to: clearly identify and reference the matters for which the auditor is relying on the support expert’s report; and annex the support expert’s report. It is the auditor’s responsibility to confirm the adequacy of the information on which he or she relies in forming an opinion about the CLID. Consequently, the auditor must accept responsibility for any conclusions underpinning the auditor’s certification and hence must not either qualify their responsibility for their conclusions or set limitations on who may rely on the soundness of their conclusions. It is appropriate, however, that the auditor identifies any relevant uncertainties about the assessment of the site or the effectiveness of proposed management measures as well as any related implications.
qpif_edocs_n3536081_module_5_auditor_certification_and_related_templates--.docx