Referral responded to Case recordings Identifies There is Children are actively Supervision reviews promptly (within 24 are written in whether strong involved where they actions of previous hours) and decisions plain, jargon free appropriate to evidence of have the ability to supervision and appropriate to identified language that work as the child and do so, including these are completed. need. would enable a CIN/CP or family attending meetings Records up to date service user to NFA. involvement or chairing their and fit for understand their in the own reviews”?) purpose story, should they development request to view of the plan. their files at a This should later date. ) include family network meetings; outlining family and friend support with specific actions for supporting the child’s safety and wellbeing. Decision making takes Files for looked Assessment The plan is Records of reviews There is evidence of accounts of previous after children includes some progressing are comprehensive reflective tools such referrals/contacts include a recent analysis and meeting and provide detailed as appreciative photo. regarding the child’s analysis of the issues inquiry or case multi-agency needs. and actions that are mapping. context and Where there required to meet this is evidence outcomes, including information is the plan is timescales. used to inform not meeting decision the child’s making. needs, the reasons for this are explored and changes made if needed Manager’s risk analysis & Child seen The case file rationale for decision alone (where recording evidenced and appropriate), tells the appropriate for referral spoken to and child’s story information and history. their views and evidences recorded and progress. reflected in assessment. Assessment demonstrates a sense of the child. There is evidence of direct work undertaken with the child to ascertain what life is like for them.
Referral responded to promptly (within 24 hours) and decisions appropriate to identified need. Case recordings are written in plain, jargon free language that would enable a service user to understand their story, should they request to view their files at a later date. ) Identifies whether appropriate to work as CIN/CP or NFA. There is strong evidence of the child and family involvement in the development of the plan. This should include family network meetings; outlining family and friend support with specific actions for supporting the child’s safety and wellbeing. Children are actively involved where they have the ability to do so, including attending meetings or chairing their own reviews”?) Supervision reviews actions of previous supervision and these are completed. Records up to date and fit for purpose Decision making takes accounts of previous referrals/contacts Files for looked after children include a recent photo. Assessment includes some analysis regarding multi-agency context and this information is used to inform decision making. The plan is progressing and meeting the child’s needs. Where there is evidence the plan is not meeting the child’s needs, the reasons for this are explored and changes made if needed Records of reviews are comprehensive and provide detailed analysis of the issues and actions that are required to meet outcomes, including timescales. There is evidence of reflective tools such as appreciative inquiry or case mapping. Manager’s risk analysis & rationale for decision evidenced and appropriate for referral information and history. Child seen alone (where appropriate), spoken to and their views recorded and reflected in assessment. Assessment demonstrates a sense of the child. There is evidence of direct work undertaken with the child to ascertain what life is like for them. The case file recording tells the child’s story and evidences progress.
Quality%20Assurance%20Framework%20FINAL%20DRAFT%20Sept%202017.docx