Total Number of Baselined 0% of total requirements More than 0% and less More than 25% of total Requirements have been added or than 25% of total requirements have been changed. requirements have been added or changed. Total Number of Added added or changed. Requirements Action: do nothing Action: assess impact to Action: assess impact cost and schedule; Total Number of Changed to cost and schedule; rebaseline schedule, Requirements may need to rebaseline and launch meeting Total Number of Deleted Program or Component series with Component Requirements Projects Projects who met this criteria to conduct an requirements Process Metrics 100% “Yes” Greater than 90% but Less than 90% “Yes” less than 100% “Yes” All Program-level business Action: do nothing Action: Are exceptions requirements are accounted for Action: Are exceptions noted, if any? If yes, in the Requirements Traceability noted, if any? If yes, ensure they are Matrix (RTM) ensure they are documented and do not documented and do count towards the 100% The RTM was approved by the not count towards the Yes goal. Otherwise, business Subject Matter Experts 100% goal. Otherwise, launch investigations (SMEs) begin monitoring and and conduct a series of controlling efforts. meetings to complete the necessary work. Design, Development, and Configuration Metrics Performance Measure Green Yellow Red Total Number of Peer Reviews Trending Week to Week Trend towards Trend towards closure Planned towards completion completion shows shows inactivity for more inactivity for two weeks. than two weeks. Total Number of Peer Reviews Action: do nothing Conducted Action: assess need for Action: assess need for peer reviews, assess peer reviews, assess Total Number of Peer Reviews issue(s) preventing issue(s) preventing peer Outstanding peer reviews from reviews from occurring, occurring, and put put appropriate action appropriate action plans in place, and plans in place. consider re-baselining. Total Number of Peer Review Trending Week to Week Trend towards closure Trend towards closure Defects Detected towards closure shows inactivity for two shows inactivity for more weeks. than two weeks. Total Number of Peer Review Action: do nothing Defects Closed Action: assess issue(s) Action: assess issue(s) preventing closure and preventing closure, put Total Number of Peer Review put appropriate action appropriate action plans Defects Open plans in place. in place, and consider re-baselining.
Total Number of Baselined Requirements Total Number of Added Requirements Total Number of Changed Requirements Total Number of Deleted Requirements 0% of total requirements have been added or changed. Action: do nothing More than 0% and less than 25% of total requirements have been added or changed. Action: assess impact to cost and schedule; may need to rebaseline Program or Component Projects More than 25% of total requirements have been added or changed. Action: assess impact to cost and schedule; rebaseline schedule, and launch meeting series with Component Projects who met this criteria to conduct an requirements Process Metrics All Program-level business requirements are accounted for in the Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) The RTM was approved by the business Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) 100% “Yes” Action: do nothing Greater than 90% but less than 100% “Yes” Action: Are exceptions noted, if any? If yes, ensure they are documented and do not count towards the 100% goal. Otherwise, begin monitoring and controlling efforts. Less than 90% “Yes” Action: Are exceptions noted, if any? If yes, ensure they are documented and do not count towards the 100% Yes goal. Otherwise, launch investigations and conduct a series of meetings to complete the necessary work. Design, Development, and Configuration Metrics Performance Measure Green Yellow Red Total Number of Peer Reviews Planned Total Number of Peer Reviews Conducted Total Number of Peer Reviews Outstanding Trending Week to Week towards completion Action: do nothing Trend towards completion shows inactivity for two weeks. Action: assess need for peer reviews, assess issue(s) preventing peer reviews from occurring, and put appropriate action plans in place. Trend towards closure shows inactivity for more than two weeks. Action: assess need for peer reviews, assess issue(s) preventing peer reviews from occurring, put appropriate action plans in place, and consider re-baselining. Total Number of Peer Review Defects Detected Total Number of Peer Review Defects Closed Total Number of Peer Review Defects Open Trending Week to Week towards closure Action: do nothing Trend towards closure shows inactivity for two weeks. Action: assess issue(s) preventing closure and put appropriate action plans in place. Trend towards closure shows inactivity for more than two weeks. Action: assess issue(s) preventing closure, put appropriate action plans in place, and consider re-baselining.
ProgramGovernanceQualityManagementPlanTemplate.docx