Access to Services: Access to service StatsSA Wards are given a score of 0 to 4 – Combines data from Census delivery effects the Census 2011 depending on the extent of their 2011 on access to water and resilience of access to basic services. Wards sanitation, energy, and communities in terms of with the least access are given a waste collection. health and time available rating of 4. for activities other than The weightings for the individual providing for basic census components are as follows: needs. 40% Energy: 25% Sanitation: 25% Waste: 10% Household Income: Households with a low StatsSA Wards are given a score of 0 to 4 – Census 2011 household of income are less Census 2011 depending on income profiles. income data. likely to have access to Wards with the lowest income credit and less resilient profiles are given a rating of 4. to all shocks including – Ranked by Divided annual income those associated with into groups: climate change and its impacts on health, None: 0 economy, and infrastructure. Low: 0 - R38 200 Medium: R38 201 - R153 800 High: >R 153 800 Points assigned as follows: +1 where None > 10% (Nat avg = 15.1%) +1 where Low > 20% (Nat avg = 48%) +1 where Medium < 10% (Nat avg = 22.2%) +1 where High < 5% (Nat avg = 14.7%)
Access to Services: Combines data from Census 2011 on access to water and sanitation, energy, and waste collection. Access to service delivery effects the resilience of communities in terms of health and time available for activities other than providing for basic needs. StatsSA – Census 2011 Wards are given a score of 0 to 4 depending on the extent of their access to basic services. Wards with the least access are given a rating of 4. The weightings for the individual census components are as follows: 40% Energy: 25% Sanitation: 25% Waste: 10% Household Income: Census 2011 household income data. Households with a low of income are less likely to have access to credit and less resilient to all shocks – including those associated with climate change and its impacts on health, economy, and infrastructure. StatsSA – Census 2011 Wards are given a score of 0 to 4 depending on income profiles. Wards with the lowest income profiles are given a rating of 4. Ranked by Divided annual income into groups: None: 0 Low: 0 - R38 200 Medium: R38 201 - R153 800 High: >R 153 800 Points assigned as follows: +1 where None > 10% (Nat avg = 15.1%) +1 where Low > 20% (Nat avg = 48%) +1 where Medium < 10% (Nat avg = 22.2%) +1 where High < 5% (Nat avg = 14.7%)
risk_and_vulnerability_260803part2.docx