10. Evaluate and rate the above solutions from the three perspectives of cost effectiveness, risk assessment and ethical consideration. Solution Cost-effectiveness Risk Ethical Score (Low, medium, assessment consideration high) (Low, medium, (Ethical, not high) ethical) Example: Low High Ethical 3 Option (1) (The casualties (The (Killing one To would be low consequences person could assassinate compared to a war, of assassination save tens of Hitler with the are uncertain millions of martyrdom of the and lives) / assassin(s) at unpredictable. Not ethical most.) For example, (Assassination the itself is Assassination at immoral) Sarajevo led to the outbreak of the First World War.)
10. Evaluate and rate the above solutions from the three perspectives of cost effectiveness, risk assessment and ethical consideration. Solution Cost-effectiveness (Low, medium, high) Risk assessment (Low, medium, high) Ethical consideration (Ethical, not ethical) Score Example: Option (1) To assassinate Hitler Low (The casualties would be low compared to a war, with the martyrdom of the assassin(s) at most.) High (The consequences of assassination are uncertain and unpredictable. For example, the Assassination at Sarajevo led to the outbreak of the First World War.) Ethical (Killing one person could save tens of millions of lives) / Not ethical (Assassination itself is immoral) 3
Resource_Package_on_The_Integrative_Use_of_Generic_Skills.docx