1: Response Logframe Means of Verification (data Description of Objectively Verifiable Activity Output/ Deliverable Expected Outcome Main national source, method of collection, conducted by Indicator (link to sec 2) (link to sec 2.9) (link to sec 3) partners involved responsibility and the CTCN (see Annex 5 guidance) periodicity) 1.1 Summary Climate 1.1 Scope of study Activity 1.1 Review of document of technologies are (sources used, countries Activity 1: experiences experiences identified and 1.1 Document considered) MVOTMA Uruguay Review of Activity 1.2 Analysis of prioritized, adapted 1.2 Proposal of 1.2 Records of meetings and 1.2 Acceptance of the experiences possible variables to be to the national variables to be workshops proposed variables measured context measured 2.1 Agreements reached 2.2 and 2.3 Lists of Activity 2.1 Gathering Agreements on new Activity 2: MVOTMA, databases information tools or tools Level of detail used, UDELAR, Gathering 2.4 and 2.5 Agreed strengthened as a Existence of documents Activity 2.2 INUMET, IGM, ease of use information and structure of database result of the launch MTOP, MINTUR launch response workshop 2.6 Detailed timetable 2.7 Report of launch workshop Risk identification related to climate 3.1 Historical database Activity 3.1 Historical variability and of dynamics 3.1 Database resolution Activity 3: change will be databases of dynamics established in Historical MVOTMA 3.2 Variables used Review of databases improved as a MVOTMA’s Activity 3.2 Projections of databases 3.3. Database reliability result of Environmental climate change dynamics implementing the Information System technological tool Local academic Technical document, graphic 4.1 Graphic outputs on Risk identification Number of variables Activity 4.1 Analysis of the Activity 4: institutions outputs the impacts of erosion related to climate initially defined that have coastal impacts of climate
1: Response Logframe Activity (link to sec 2) Description of conducted by the CTCN Output/ Deliverable (link to sec 2.9) Expected Outcome (link to sec 3) Main national partners involved Objectively Verifiable Indicator (see Annex 5 guidance) Means of Verification (data source, method of collection, responsibility and periodicity) Activity 1: Review of experiences Activity 1.1 Review of experiences Activity 1.2 Analysis of possible variables to be measured 1.1 Summary document of experiences 1.2 Proposal of variables to be measured Climate technologies are identified and prioritized, adapted to the national context MVOTMA Uruguay 1.1 Scope of study (sources used, countries considered) 1.2 Acceptance of the proposed variables 1.1 Document 1.2 Records of meetings and workshops Activity 2: Gathering information and launch Activity 2.1 Gathering information Activity 2.2 launch workshop 2.1 Agreements reached 2.2 and 2.3 Lists of databases 2.4 and 2.5 Agreed structure of database 2.6 Detailed timetable 2.7 Report of launch workshop Agreements on new tools or tools strengthened as a result of the response MVOTMA, UDELAR, INUMET, IGM, MTOP, MINTUR Level of detail used, ease of use Existence of documents Activity 3: Historical databases Activity 3.1 Historical databases of dynamics Activity 3.2 Projections of climate change dynamics 3.1 Historical database of dynamics established in MVOTMA’s Environmental Information System Risk identification related to climate variability and change will be improved as a result of implementing the technological tool MVOTMA 3.1 Database resolution 3.2 Variables used 3.3. Database reliability Review of databases Activity 4: Activity 4.1 Analysis of the coastal impacts of climate 4.1 Graphic outputs on the impacts of erosion Risk identification related to climate Local academic institutions Number of variables initially defined that have Technical document, graphic outputs
response_plan_uruguay_2015000074_final_en.docx