Table of Amendments Amendment Details Effective Date General Amend the application of Assessment Criteria to ensure it can be directly linked to the scope of 30 March 2009 Supplies to facilitate procurement outcomes Amended the reflect new Tier levels and Quotation requirements General Corrected references to Industry Capability Network (NT) Office to reflect name change 1 July 2012 Amendments to remove the use of acronyms in the Directions and maintain consistency in the use of defined terminology Removed duplication of the Direction in the following explanations Introduced a sixth Procurement Tier PO1.2 Added new Direction Assessment Method covering the explanation and treatment of weighting price 1 July 2012 – in assessments (this has resulted in consequential adjustments to Direction numbering) PO1.4 PO1.6 New Directions associated with the introduction of Procurement Reforms changes 1 July 2012 – PO1.9 PO1.10 Applying explicit weighting on price and mandatory minimum 20% weighting for local development and 1 July 2012 – value adding assessment criterion PO1.12 PO1.15 Disclosure of Assessment Criteria Percentage Weightings for all procurement activity from Tier Three 1 July 2012 – and greater (that is $50 000+) Assessment Criteria Changed criterion of of to 1 July 2012 “Whole Life Costs” “Price” Amendments to clarify considerations under each criterion including omitted treatment of Industry Procurement Plans under Local Development and Value Adding Criterion Attachment A Removed 1 July 2012 General Formatted for WCAG2.0 accessibility changes to formatting, spelling, grammar and punctuation 1 January 2013 – PO1.14 XIX Inserted to clarify the requirements for weighting Price 1 February 2013 PO1.13 PO1.14 Corrected numbering error 20 March 2013 – General Amended to reflect Procurement Reforms changes 1 July 2014
Table of Amendments Amendment Details Effective Date General Amend the application of Assessment Criteria to ensure it can be directly linked to the scope of Supplies to facilitate procurement outcomes Amended the reflect new Tier levels and Quotation requirements 30 March 2009 General Corrected references to Industry Capability Network (NT) Office to reflect name change Amendments to remove the use of acronyms in the Directions and maintain consistency in the use of defined terminology Removed duplication of the Direction in the following explanations Introduced a sixth Procurement Tier 1 July 2012 PO1.2 Added new Direction – Assessment Method covering the explanation and treatment of weighting price in assessments (this has resulted in consequential adjustments to Direction numbering) 1 July 2012 PO1.4 – PO1.6 New Directions associated with the introduction of Procurement Reforms changes 1 July 2012 PO1.9 – PO1.10 Applying explicit weighting on price and mandatory minimum 20% weighting for local development and value adding assessment criterion 1 July 2012 PO1.12 – PO1.15 Disclosure of Assessment Criteria Percentage Weightings for all procurement activity from Tier Three and greater (that is $50 000+) 1 July 2012 Assessment Criteria Changed criterion of “Whole of Life Costs” to “Price” Amendments to clarify considerations under each criterion including omitted treatment of Industry Procurement Plans under Local Development and Value Adding Criterion 1 July 2012 Attachment A Removed 1 July 2012 General Formatted for WCAG2.0 accessibility – changes to formatting, spelling, grammar and punctuation 1 January 2013 PO1.14 XIX Inserted to clarify the requirements for weighting Price 1 February 2013 PO1.13 – PO1.14 Corrected numbering error 20 March 2013 General Amended to reflect Procurement Reforms changes 1 July 2014
procurement-directions-18042016.docx