What are the three closest programmes of education and training (whether or not they lead to nationally standardised NFQ awards) and why are these inadequate for the new requirement? Where does the expertise to develop the proposed award reside? Are these experts likely to be available to support the work of standards development? Who will fund and provide the programmes of education and training that would lead to this award(s)? Conservatively estimate how many enrolments and awards would be made annually for each of the first five years? Has a systematic needs (cost versus benefit) analysis been completed? What did it conclude concerning national, regional or local needs over each of the first five years? Is there a viable business plan for provision of programmes of education and training that would lead to this qualification? Prioritisation Process A list of proposal descriptions will be maintained and be published along with the proponent’s identity. Development work will be scheduled on the basis of need and priority. Not all proposals can be expected to achieve sufficient priority to warrant development. More details on the prioritisation process will be published soon. A list of current awards standards development work will be maintained and published. However, placement on the list is not a guarantee that a national award standard will result. Award Standards Development Process The work on the development of new standards will be undertaken by an appointed expert group with current knowledge of the discipline(s) concerned, pedagogical expertise and an understanding of learner and employer perspectives. Terms of References Terms of reference will be established for each expert group and published by QQI. Consultation All draft awards standards will be published for public observations prior to finalisation. Awards Standards Review Proposals Proposals for the review of existing awards standards (including CAS specifications) are invited and will be published along with the proponent’s identity. Review work will also be planned to ensure the highest priority work is tackled first. Proposals to review existing published award standards will address the following:
What are the three closest programmes of education and training (whether or not they lead to nationally standardised NFQ awards) and why are these inadequate for the new requirement? Where does the expertise to develop the proposed award reside? Are these experts likely to be available to support the work of standards development? Who will fund and provide the programmes of education and training that would lead to this award(s)? Conservatively estimate how many enrolments and awards would be made annually for each of the first five years? Has a systematic needs (cost versus benefit) analysis been completed? What did it conclude concerning national, regional or local needs over each of the first five years? Is there a viable business plan for provision of programmes of education and training that would lead to this qualification? Prioritisation Process A list of proposal descriptions will be maintained and be published along with the proponent’s identity. Development work will be scheduled on the basis of need and priority. Not all proposals can be expected to achieve sufficient priority to warrant development. More details on the prioritisation process will be published soon. A list of current awards standards development work will be maintained and published. However, placement on the list is not a guarantee that a national award standard will result. Award Standards Development Process The work on the development of new standards will be undertaken by an appointed expert group with current knowledge of the discipline(s) concerned, pedagogical expertise and an understanding of learner and employer perspectives. Terms of References Terms of reference will be established for each expert group and published by QQI. Consultation All draft awards standards will be published for public observations prior to finalisation. Awards Standards Review Proposals Proposals for the review of existing awards standards (including CAS specifications) are invited and will be published along with the proponent’s identity. Review work will also be planned to ensure the highest priority work is tackled first. Proposals to review existing published award standards will address the following:
QQI%20Guidelines%20and%20Criteria%20for%20Proposing%20the%20Development%20of%20New%20Award%20Standards%20201114.docx