Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding R.14-10-010 number: 6. Date of ALJ ruling: 7. Based on another CPUC determination D.17-04-035 02/03/15 (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible Yes government entity status? Showing of or §1803.1(b)) “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding R.14-10-010 number: 10. Date of ALJ ruling: 11. Based on another CPUC determination D.17-04-035 02/03/15 (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804©): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.17-04-039 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: May 8, 2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: July 7, 2017 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Claimed Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Contribution(s) Claimed Contribution(s) Decision D.17-07-039 settled (please note that Attachment 2 includes a list of issue areas, and of GPI Track 2 issues in the energy storage proceeding Pleadings relevant to this Claim.) Task 1. V1G Eligibility Verified Decision Decision D.17-04-039 declines Providing yet another forum to consider to allow V1G smart charging V1G issues can create confusion, further technology to be eligible for undermining the goal of increasing the the D.14-10-045 storage deployment of two-way storage targets, as the GPI proposed.
Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-10-010 6. Date of ALJ ruling: 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.17-04-035 02/03/15 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible government entity status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) or §1803.1(b)) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-10-010 10. Date of ALJ ruling: 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): D.17-04-035 02/03/15 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804©): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.17-04-039 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: May 8, 2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: July 7, 2017 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion Decision D.17-07-039 settled Track 2 issues in the energy storage proceeding (please note that Attachment 2 includes a list of issue areas, and of GPI Pleadings relevant to this Claim.) Task 1. V1G Eligibility Decision D.17-04-039 declines to allow V1G smart charging technology to be eligible for the D.14-10-045 storage targets, as the GPI proposed. Decision Providing yet another forum to consider V1G issues can create confusion, further undermining the goal of increasing the deployment of two-way storage Verified
193663441.docx