Our evaluation, delivered in partnership with the Anne Frank Trust and University of Kent, seeks to provide quantitative data to support existing qualitative feedback about the extent to which the outcomes are achieved. It also uses an experimental design method of evaluation that substantially adds to previous efforts by SRtRC and others to measure the impacts of interventions. The tools for this evaluation were first developed by the Anne Frank Trust and University of Kent (2014, 2016), and our partnership with the Anne Frank Trust has enabled these to be adapted for use by SRtRC. SRtRC anticipates that the evaluation will also provide quantitative data to support its assertion that the SRtRC educational model for challenging racism can be applied to other forms of prejudice and discrimination. This would then support the case for establishing a robust evidence base to support the delivery of similar interventions focused on reducing prejudice and discrimination towards people who share a range of protected characteristics. In practical terms, SRtRC hopes to use the data derived from the evaluation to help deliver more interventions tackling homophobia, biphobia and transphobia, as well as supporting the case for delivering hate crime focused interventions in the future and the need for these to be robustly evaluated.
Our evaluation, delivered in partnership with the Anne Frank Trust and University of Kent, seeks to provide quantitative data to support existing qualitative feedback about the extent to which the outcomes are achieved. It also uses an experimental design method of evaluation that substantially adds to previous efforts by SRtRC and others to measure the impacts of interventions. The tools for this evaluation were first developed by the Anne Frank Trust and University of Kent (2014, 2016), and our partnership with the Anne Frank Trust has enabled these to be adapted for use by SRtRC. SRtRC anticipates that the evaluation will also provide quantitative data to support its assertion that the SRtRC educational model for challenging racism can be applied to other forms of prejudice and discrimination. This would then support the case for establishing a robust evidence base to support the delivery of similar interventions focused on reducing prejudice and discrimination towards people who share a range of protected characteristics. In practical terms, SRtRC hopes to use the data derived from the evaluation to help deliver more interventions tackling homophobia, biphobia and transphobia, as well as supporting the case for delivering hate crime focused interventions in the future and the need for these to be robustly evaluated.
prejudice-unlawful-behaviour-anti-prejudice-projects-show-racism-the-red-card.docx