105,250 Total budgeted cost Other approaches Action Intended outcome What is the evidence and How will you ensure it is Staff lead When will you review rationale for this choice? implemented well? implementation? CEIAG- Aspire Program Diminish the differences in EEF research shows the actions Appointed CEIAG Lead Teacher to VVA Half termly against- Aspire PP students will actively limiting external factors and identified deliver the most impact with work alongside AHT- Personal SLO- CEIAG Program/ Bench marks. meet all 8 Benchmarks opportunities between PP low cost. Development. lead teacher 100% PP students meet all 8 through: and Non PP. Review against Aspire Program half BM July 2019 A stable careers Increase Aspiration and termly. 100% PP students Complete Aspiration Interventions program. Ambition. Work Experience. June 2019 Social and Emotional learning Exposure to accurate. local and global LMI. ‘Every young person needs Bespoke opportunities. quality career guidance to make Linking curriculum informed decisions about their future. subjects to Careers. Good career guidance is a necessity Encounters with for delivering technical education employers and reforms and is a vehicle for social Employees. justice: those young people without Work experience. social capital or home support suffer Encounters with FE and most from poor career guidance’. HE. Gatsby Bespoke Advice and guidance. career guidance is critical if ‘Good Intensive Careers young people are to raise their Advisor. aspirations and capitalise on the opportunities available to Gatsby them’. Extended Learning Provide students with EEF research shows the actions PP money is allocated based on an VVA Data Collections 1,2,3 and 4 strategy- Home and targeted resources identified deliver the most impact with Impact bid. Reviewed by AHT QA or Period 6 Registers for Period 6 and homework to support low cost. Faculty leaders target specific attendance and ATL. the learning in the resources for PP students. classroom. Digital Technology Extending learning time
Total budgeted cost 105,250 Other approaches Action Intended outcome What is the evidence and rationale for this choice? How will you ensure it is implemented well? Staff lead When will you review implementation? CEIAG- Aspire Program PP students will actively meet all 8 Benchmarks through: A stable careers program. Exposure to accurate. local and global LMI. Bespoke opportunities. Linking curriculum subjects to Careers. Encounters with employers and Employees. Work experience. Encounters with FE and HE. Bespoke Advice and guidance. Intensive Careers Advisor. Diminish the differences in limiting external factors and opportunities between PP and Non PP. Increase Aspiration and Ambition. EEF research shows the actions identified deliver the most impact with low cost. Aspiration Interventions Social and Emotional learning ‘Every young person needs career guidance to make informed decisions about their future. Good career guidance is a necessity for delivering technical education reforms and is a vehicle for social justice: those young people without social capital or home support suffer most from poor career guidance’. Gatsby ‘Good career guidance is critical if young people are to raise their aspirations and capitalise on the opportunities available to them’. Gatsby Appointed CEIAG Lead Teacher to work alongside AHT- Personal Development. Review against Aspire Program half termly. VVA SLO- CEIAG lead teacher Half termly against- Aspire Program/ Bench marks. 100% PP students meet all 8 BM July 2019 100% PP students Complete Work Experience. June 2019 Extended Learning strategy- Home and Period 6 Provide students with quality targeted resources and homework to support the learning in the classroom. EEF research shows the actions identified deliver the most impact with low cost. Digital Technology Extending learning time PP money is allocated based on an Impact bid. Reviewed by AHT Faculty leaders target specific resources for PP students. VVA Data Collections 1,2,3 and 4 QA or Period 6 Registers for attendance and ATL.
Pupil-Premium-Strategy-SEF.docx