New Zealand MEPS: increase incremental costs by 50%. Labelling: increase LED price – by 25% GHG Energy Saved Emissions Total Net (Gross) (Gross) Option (cumulative Reduction Investment Benefit Benefit to Benefit GWh to 2030) (cumulative (NPV, $M) (NPV, $M) Cost Ratio (NPV, $M) Mt to 2030) 1,201 0.08 147 Proposal A 21 125 6.8 Proposal B 2,098 0.14 239 40 199 6.0 2,321 0.29 274 Proposal C 43 231 6.4 1,424 0.23 182 Proposal D 25 157 7.4 Note: This table uses discount rates of 5% (real) for New Zealand New Zealand No Sensitivity – GHG Total Energy Saved Emissions Total Net (Gross) Option (cumulative Reduction Investment Benefit Benefit to Benefit GWh to 2030) (cumulative (NPV, $M) (NPV, $M) Cost Ratio (NPV, $M) Mt to 2030) 1,201 0.08 147 Proposal A 16 131 9.2 2,098 0.14 239 Proposal B 27 212 8.9 2,321 0.29 274 Proposal C 29 245 9.4 1,424 0.23 182 Proposal D 18 164 10.1 Note: This table uses discount rates of 5% (real) for New Zealand New Zealand MEPS: decrease incremental costs by 50%. Labelling: decrease LED price – by 25% GHG Total Energy Saved Emissions Total Net (Gross) (Gross) Option (cumulative Reduction Investment Benefit Benefit to Benefit GWh to 2030) (cumulative (NPV, $M) (NPV, $M) Cost Ratio (NPV, $M) Mt to 2030) 1,201 0.08 147 Proposal A 10 136 14.3 2,098 0.14 239 Proposal B 14 225 16.9 2,321 0.29 274 Proposal C 15 259 17.9 Proposal D 1,424 0.23 182 11 170 15.9 Note: This table uses discount rates of 5% (real) for New Zealand
New Zealand – MEPS: increase incremental costs by 50%. Labelling: increase LED price by 25% Option Energy Saved (cumulative GWh to 2030) GHG Emissions Reduction (cumulative Mt to 2030) (Gross) Benefit (NPV, $M) Total Investment (NPV, $M) Net Benefit (NPV, $M) (Gross) Benefit to Cost Ratio Proposal A 1,201 0.08 147 21 125 6.8 Proposal B 2,098 0.14 239 40 199 6.0 Proposal C 2,321 0.29 274 43 231 6.4 Proposal D 1,424 0.23 182 25 157 7.4 Note: This table uses discount rates of 5% (real) for New Zealand New Zealand – No Sensitivity Option Energy Saved (cumulative GWh to 2030) GHG Emissions Reduction (cumulative Mt to 2030) Total (Gross) Benefit (NPV, $M) Total Investment (NPV, $M) Net Benefit (NPV, $M) Benefit to Cost Ratio Proposal A 1,201 0.08 147 16 131 9.2 Proposal B 2,098 0.14 239 27 212 8.9 Proposal C 2,321 0.29 274 29 245 9.4 Proposal D 1,424 0.23 182 18 164 10.1 Note: This table uses discount rates of 5% (real) for New Zealand New Zealand – MEPS: decrease incremental costs by 50%. Labelling: decrease LED price by 25% Option Energy Saved (cumulative GWh to 2030) GHG Emissions Reduction (cumulative Mt to 2030) Total (Gross) Benefit (NPV, $M) Total Investment (NPV, $M) Net Benefit (NPV, $M) (Gross) Benefit to Cost Ratio Proposal A 1,201 0.08 147 10 136 14.3 Proposal B 2,098 0.14 239 14 225 16.9 Proposal C 2,321 0.29 274 15 259 17.9 Proposal D 1,424 0.23 182 11 170 15.9 Note: This table uses discount rates of 5% (real) for New Zealand
ris_for_consultation_lighting.docx