Please evaluate the student’s project using the criteria below. Please write additional comments. These comments are very important in the evaluation procedure. Please be as candid and thorough as possible. Exceptional Score Commendable Competent Not Yet Achievement Total Comments 3 Points 2 Points 1 Point 4 Points Points Exceeds goals of Meets goals of Not applicable Not applicable proposal; a major proposal; product was of and challenge a challenge goals challenge Meets proposal Prepares questions in Enthusiastic; knows Is enthusiastic Does not meet as advance; extends how and when to ask but is sometimes scheduled; rarely learning outside questions; shows late to meetings; asks questions; Ethic meeting times initiative; come ready asks few lethargic; Work to work questions unenthusiastic; disrespectful Product was Product was complete Product was on Product was late, complete well in early enough to allow time, but did not incomplete, or of in advance of due date for troubleshooting, allow extra time unacceptable adding finishing for quality touches, and troubleshooting, completion Timeliness evaluation etc. Exceeded Met all responsibilities Nearly met all Did not meet on responsibilities on mentor contract responsibilities responsibilities on a regular basis sheet fulfilled mentor Responsibilities Craftsmanship Craftsmanship qualities Craftsmanship Poor or demonstrates highly meet the standard for qualities do not incomplete exceptional student’s individual meet the craftsmanship; achievement as learning, skills, and standard for clearly below measured according ability levels; use of student’s standard for to all professional correct tools, individual student’s standards for this techniques, learning skills, individual kind of work technology, and ability levels; learning, skills terminology, and use of correct and ability levels; Quality leadership (were tools, little or no applicable) is observed techniques, evidence of use technology, of correct tools, Product terminology, and techniques, leadership technology, (where terminology, and applicable) leadership lacking (where applicable)
Please evaluate the student’s project using the criteria below. Please write additional comments. These comments are very important in the evaluation procedure. Please be as candid and thorough as possible. Exceptional Achievement 4 Points Commendable 3 Points Competent 2 Points Not Yet 1 Point Score Total Points Comments Meets goals of proposal and challenge Exceeds goals of proposal; a major challenge Meets goals of proposal; product was a challenge Not applicable Not applicable Work Ethic Prepares questions in advance; extends learning outside meeting times Enthusiastic; knows how and when to ask questions; shows initiative; come ready to work Is enthusiastic but is sometimes late to meetings; asks few questions Does not meet as scheduled; rarely asks questions; lethargic; unenthusiastic; disrespectful Timeliness in completion Product was complete well in advance of due date Product was complete early enough to allow for troubleshooting, adding finishing touches, and evaluation Product was on time, but did not allow extra time for troubleshooting, etc. Product was late, incomplete, or of unacceptable quality Responsibilities on mentor sheet fulfilled Exceeded responsibilities Met all responsibilities on mentor contract Nearly met all responsibilities Did not meet responsibilities on a regular basis Product Quality Craftsmanship demonstrates highly exceptional achievement as measured according to all professional standards for this kind of work Craftsmanship qualities meet the standard for student’s individual learning, skills, and ability levels; use of correct tools, techniques, technology, terminology, and leadership (were applicable) is observed Craftsmanship qualities do not meet the standard for student’s individual learning skills, and ability levels; use of correct tools, techniques, technology, terminology, and leadership (where applicable) lacking Poor or incomplete craftsmanship; clearly below standard for student’s individual learning, skills and ability levels; little or no evidence of use of correct tools, techniques, technology, terminology, and leadership (where applicable)
184910-f5a583a0-4c8a-4d1d-bb44-8bf321fb8485.docx