3.3.3 Incentives to businesses Existence of incentives to 5 Incentives are visibly achieving (or Incentives and financing may come from – organizations to improve help business owners take have achieved) required results evenly multiple sources. disaster resilience disaster to improve disaster with businesses across the city. – plans, premises etc. resilience to a standard to deal with the severe” 4 Incentives are generally effective “most – scenario (Essential 2). but with some minor shortcomings perhaps in some areas. 3 = Incentives have larger gaps in coverage of the economic base. 3 = Incentives have larger gaps in coverage of the required issues. 1 Incentives have major weaknesses – and have so far failed to achieve their purpose 0 No incentives. – 3.3.4 Incentives to non-profit Existence of incentives to 5 Incentives are visibly achieving (or Incentives and financing may come from – organizations to improve help non-profits take to have achieved) required results evenly multiple sources. disaster resilience disaster improve disaster resilience to with non profits across the city. – premises etc. a standard to deal with the Non profits may be directly concerned with severe” scenario 4 Incentives are generally effective disaster resilience issues (for example, “most – (Essential 2). but with some shortcomings emergency response groups, neighborhood perhaps in some areas. watch, food kitchens); or indirectly (for example, churches, environmental watch or similar). 3 = Incentives have larger gaps in coverage of the non-profit base. 3 = Incentives have larger gaps in coverage of the required issues. 1 Incentives have major weaknesses – and have so far failed to achieve their purpose
3.3.3 Incentives to businesses organizations to improve disaster resilience – disaster plans, premises etc. Existence of incentives to help business owners take to improve disaster resilience to a standard to deal with the “most severe” scenario (Essential 2). 5 – Incentives are visibly achieving (or have achieved) required results evenly with businesses across the city. 4 – Incentives are generally effective but with some minor shortcomings perhaps in some areas. 3 = Incentives have larger gaps in coverage of the economic base. 3 = Incentives have larger gaps in coverage of the required issues. 1 – Incentives have major weaknesses and have so far failed to achieve their purpose 0 – No incentives. Incentives and financing may come from multiple sources. 3.3.4 Incentives to non-profit organizations to improve disaster resilience – disaster premises etc. Existence of incentives to help non-profits take to improve disaster resilience to a standard to deal with the “most severe” scenario (Essential 2). 5 – Incentives are visibly achieving (or have achieved) required results evenly with non profits across the city. 4 – Incentives are generally effective but with some shortcomings perhaps in some areas. 3 = Incentives have larger gaps in coverage of the non-profit base. 3 = Incentives have larger gaps in coverage of the required issues. 1 – Incentives have major weaknesses and have so far failed to achieve their purpose Incentives and financing may come from multiple sources. Non profits may be directly concerned with disaster resilience issues (for example, emergency response groups, neighborhood watch, food kitchens); or indirectly (for example, churches, environmental watch or similar).
Resilience%20Scorecard%20Updated%20V2%20-%20April%2030th%202015.docx