Ordering Paragraph 21: (p. 88) savings associated with Phase 1 “Cost shall be used to fund the bridge period (if necessary) and reinvested in future phases.” Solar concedes D.16-12-065: “Vote that the Commission deems utility “[i]f ownership of EVSE is necessary, then it should be limited to the underserved markets of MUDs and low-income Opening Brief of Vote Solar, (P. 36) June 17, 2016: communities.” (p. 84) Ordering Paragraph 1: the Commission deems “If utility ownership of EVSE is shall not own EVSEs installed “PG&E necessary, then it should be in workplaces in the non-Disadvantaged limited to the underserved Communities segments” markets of MUDs and (p. 6) communities.” Verified Issue C. Grid Integration/ the time being, we D.16-12-065: “For Load Management will adopt the Program Advisory Council proposal submitted by the Settling Parties, with the following Opening Brief of Vote Solar, modifications. First, the Program June 17, 2016: Advisory Council shall provide input on criteria to assess the load management also says in the “PG&E plans of site (pp. 69-70) hosts…” Settlement Agreement that they will to leverage “aim Ordering Paragraph 17: (p. 87) existing or planned load Program Advisory Council may “The management pilots and suggest criteria by which to assess the including the programs,”1 load management plans of site hosts, but PG&E/BMW iChargeForward the responsibility to approve the load pilot and the Electric Power management plans remains with Pacific Research Institute’s “Open Gas and Electric Company (PG&E).” Vehicle Grid Integration (p. 87) PG&E further says Platform.”2 it will adopt an EV “Advanced Grid program for Support” Phase 2 of the program.3 This language is simply too vague
Opening Brief of Vote Solar, June 17, 2016: “If the Commission deems utility ownership of EVSE is necessary, then it should be limited to the underserved markets of MUDs and communities.” (p. 6) Ordering Paragraph 21: (p. 88) “Cost savings associated with Phase 1 shall be used to fund the bridge period (if necessary) and reinvested in future phases.” D.16-12-065: “Vote Solar concedes that “[i]f the Commission deems utility ownership of EVSE is necessary, then it should be limited to the underserved markets of MUDs and low-income communities.” (P. 36) Ordering Paragraph 1: (p. 84) “PG&E shall not own EVSEs installed in workplaces in the non-Disadvantaged Communities segments” Issue C. Grid Integration/ Load Management Opening Brief of Vote Solar, June 17, 2016: “PG&E also says in the Settlement Agreement that they will “aim to leverage existing or planned load management pilots and programs,”1 including the PG&E/BMW iChargeForward pilot and the Electric Power Research Institute’s “Open Vehicle Grid Integration Platform.”2 PG&E further says it will adopt an “Advanced EV Grid Support” program for Phase 2 of the program.3 This language is simply too vague D.16-12-065: “For the time being, we will adopt the Program Advisory Council proposal submitted by the Settling Parties, with the following modifications. First, the Program Advisory Council shall provide input on criteria to assess the load management plans of site hosts…” (pp. 69-70) Ordering Paragraph 17: (p. 87) “The Program Advisory Council may suggest criteria by which to assess the load management plans of site hosts, but the responsibility to approve the load management plans remains with Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E).” (p. 87) Verified
183284877.docx