help to avoid that again, is very aspects of tourism’ (for details see footnote much welcomed. changes in the present 3 below table). ‘no navigation regime should be implemented in pursuit of tourist-related economic gain.’ 13 I think the AOEP plan is excellent on this and other Not really, I can't beyond points. I fully support it. my house. 14 The wild life, and fauna, are very special to the area. Concerned about the effect on Plans for the Snape The landscape is unique. The ideas to have monitoring Snape Marsh if the inner wall scheme will be discussed plans and review the estuary plan from time to time option is chosen. with the community very seem sensible. shortly. 15 is a great deal of reed bed and saltings at the upper end of Butley Creek. This has all been turned into a closed bird reserve, managed by the RSPB. Reasonable compromise, If "spreading room" is Protect wildlife as far as possible instigated here under the new coastal path regime all the good work of the last twenty years will be lost. Saltings are now increasing in the upper reaches of Butley Creek, and this helps the sea defences 16 The RSPB (I think) and EA has a reed bed marsh up stream of The current river walls and the estuary provide lovely the big sluice gates. It is habitats for wading birds and the surrounding Haven and dammed off so they can control Minsmere provide further marsh habitats. The river is an the water height in the marsh essential feature of coasts and heaths scenery in that it area. The dam/bank is I believe provides sailing and racing that is not available anywhere to be 0.9 meters. I cannot see north of us - up until the Broads. how damming off acres of flood plain in an area that floods can be seen as a good idea? 17 It is the visual impact of the high wall to conserve Note worthy features of Iken to the wetlands. preserve, see note 2 below
help to avoid that again, is very much welcomed. aspects of tourism’ (for details see footnote 3 below table). ‘no changes in the present navigation regime should be implemented in pursuit of tourist-related economic gain.’ 13 I think the AOEP plan is excellent on this and other points. I fully support it. Not really, I can't beyond my house. 14 The wild life, and fauna, are very special to the area. The landscape is unique. The ideas to have monitoring plans and review the estuary plan from time to time seem sensible. Concerned about the effect on Snape Marsh if the inner wall option is chosen. Plans for the Snape scheme will be discussed with the community very shortly. 15 Reasonable compromise, Protect wildlife as far as possible is a great deal of reed bed and saltings at the upper end of Butley Creek. This has all been turned into a closed bird reserve, managed by the RSPB. If "spreading room" is instigated here under the new coastal path regime all the good work of the last twenty years will be lost. Saltings are now increasing in the upper reaches of Butley Creek, and this helps the sea defences 16 The current river walls and the estuary provide lovely habitats for wading birds and the surrounding Haven and Minsmere provide further marsh habitats. The river is an essential feature of coasts and heaths scenery in that it provides sailing and racing that is not available anywhere north of us - up until the Broads. The RSPB (I think) and EA has a reed bed marsh up stream of the big sluice gates. It is dammed off so they can control the water height in the marsh area. The dam/bank is I believe to be 0.9 meters. I cannot see how damming off acres of flood plain in an area that floods can be seen as a good idea? 17 It is the visual impact of the high wall to conserve the wetlands. Note worthy features of Iken to preserve, see note 2 below
Question-3-AOEP-Consultation.docx