Table 5: Results of the Moderated Regression Analysis for affective commitment (career) Model 1 Model 2 Leadership style Transformational leadership -.05 -.04 Moderator variable Affective commitment .09 .10 (career) Interaction effect Transformational leadership x -.05 Affective commitment (career) R2 .01 .01 ΔR² .01 .00 *p<0.05, **p<0.01 N=39 Table 6: Results of the Moderated Regression Analysis for affective commitment (leader) Model 1 Model 2 Leadership style Transformational leadership -.18 -.20 Moderator variable Affective commitment ..17 .17 (leader) Interaction effect Transformational leadership x -.15 Affective commitment (leader) R2 .01 .04 ΔR² .01 .02 *p<0.05, **p<0.01 N=39
Table 5: Results of the Moderated Regression Analysis for affective commitment (career) Model 1 Model 2 Leadership style Transformational leadership -.05 -.04 Moderator variable Affective commitment (career) .09 .10 Interaction effect Transformational leadership x Affective commitment (career) -.05 R2 .01 .01 ΔR² .01 .00 *p<0.05, **p<0.01 N=39 Table 6: Results of the Moderated Regression Analysis for affective commitment (leader) Model 1 Model 2 Leadership style Transformational leadership -.18 -.20 Moderator variable Affective commitment (leader) ..17 .17 Interaction effect Transformational leadership x Affective commitment (leader) -.15 R2 .01 .04 ΔR² .01 .02 *p<0.05, **p<0.01 N=39
Poppendick-P-s0157368-Bachelorthese.docx