needs. preliminary and ongoing support given to using the Number of PICs the research data and the pilot PIC (Tuvalu) to Responsive Fund toolkit is implemented to. providing technical implement the toolkit (as mechanism enabling inputs into requested). Access to Justice integrated Plans to be planning. developed and implemented. Enabling Rights Project Claim(s) of NA Baseline 2013: Two in-country visits have been A methodology Quality of toolkit for Toolkit and previously unmet courts do not undertaken (Kiribati) to assess enabling those promoting justice for TA/PIC reports. legal needs are promote equal the needs of the Judiciary; legal seeking justice to beneficiaries. brought to, and access to or focus sector and community at large; access available Percentage increase in resolved by, the on being responsive and pilot the Enabling Rights remedies is claims made to courts for courts in at least one to the needs of the Toolkit. developed, piloted remedies focussed on PIC. citizens they serve. The Enabling Rights Toolkit has and adopted in one during the pilot. As a result, there is been finalised and made PIC. a plethora of unmet available electronically to all justice needs within Partner Courts and the community. stakeholders. Family Violence and Juvenile Justice Project Up to five PICs Improvements in 2012 Baseline: Workshops have been held in Improvements in Number of judicial TA responding as a competence to Judicial and court seven PICs to improve awareness, officers trained and sector, more manage officers are not competence and responses to knowledge, skills, quality of training, participant holistically and family/juvenile aware of and/or not family/juvenile justice issues. attitudes relating to including relevance, assessments. competently to issues in two PICs. appropriately Five PICs received a follow-up relevant issues, law, usefulness, skills and family/juvenile justice responding to family visit to bolster these outcomes. contemporary knowledge gained. issues. violence and practice and juvenile justice procedure in up to On average 50 participants issues which are two additional PICs attended each workshop. All pervasive across the and increased participants reported increased region and the poor cooperation, confidence and demonstrated responses to these coordination and
needs. preliminary research data and providing technical inputs into integrated planning. and ongoing support given to the pilot PIC (Tuvalu) to implement the toolkit (as requested). using the Responsive Fund mechanism enabling Access to Justice Plans to be developed and implemented. Number of PICs the toolkit is implemented to. Enabling Rights Project Claim(s) of previously unmet legal needs are brought to, and resolved by, the courts in at least one PIC. NA Baseline 2013: courts do not promote equal access to or focus on being responsive to the needs of the citizens they serve. As a result, there is a plethora of unmet justice needs within the community. Two in-country visits have been undertaken (Kiribati) to assess the needs of the Judiciary; legal sector and community at large; and pilot the Enabling Rights Toolkit. The Enabling Rights Toolkit has been finalised and made available electronically to all Partner Courts and stakeholders. A methodology enabling those seeking justice to access available remedies is developed, piloted and adopted in one PIC. Quality of toolkit for promoting justice for beneficiaries. Toolkit and TA/PIC reports. Percentage increase in claims made to courts for remedies focussed on during the pilot. Family Violence and Juvenile Justice Project Up to five PICs responding as a sector, more holistically and competently to family/juvenile justice issues. Improvements in competence to manage family/juvenile issues in two PICs. 2012 Baseline: Judicial and court officers are not aware of and/or not appropriately responding to family violence and juvenile justice issues which are pervasive across the region and the poor responses to these Workshops have been held in seven PICs to improve competence and responses to family/juvenile justice issues. Five PICs received a follow-up visit to bolster these outcomes. On average 50 participants attended each workshop. All participants reported increased confidence and demonstrated Improvements in awareness, knowledge, skills, attitudes relating to relevant issues, law, contemporary practice and procedure in up to two additional PICs and increased cooperation, coordination and Number of judicial officers trained and quality of training, including relevance, usefulness, skills and knowledge gained. participant TA assessments.
Programme-Completion-Report-annexes.docx