6. Information In one implementation of the With a greater sample size, more Literacy Model assessment 8/8 (100%) of the differentiation in rubric scores will be candidates earned scores in the anticipated. acceptable or target ranges. Score for the Curriculum Alignment dimension were lower than scores for the other assessment dimensions. This may be attributable to modifications to the Maryland State Curriculum , and local school systems curriculum which are in the process of realignment with the Common Core curriculum. 8. MARC In one implementation of the Part I of No specific actions recommended other Assignment/LOC the assessment 6/6 (100%) of the than the formative assessment of the new Field Trip candidates earned scores in the Assessment # 8 Pathfinder. – acceptable or target ranges. In one implementations of the Part II of the assessment 6/6 (100%) of the candidates earned scores in the acceptable or target ranges. Candidate’s scores for the MARC 245, 3XX, 4XX, and 8XX fields were low in comparison to recent r implementations of the assessment, candidates have scored at the on average at the target levels. This was the last implementation of this assessment which has been replaced by a new assessment #8 titled, Pathfinder. AY13: Have the change(s) in response to data that you documented last year had the desired effect on your program? Please provide specifics referencing prior changes that you submitted in Fall 2012, covering AY 2011-2012.
6. Information Literacy Model In one implementation of the assessment 8/8 (100%) of the candidates earned scores in the acceptable or target ranges. Score for the Curriculum Alignment dimension were lower than scores for the other assessment dimensions. This may be attributable to modifications to the Maryland State Curriculum , and local school systems curriculum which are in the process of realignment with the Common Core curriculum. With a greater sample size, more differentiation in rubric scores will be anticipated. 8. MARC Assignment/LOC Field Trip In one implementation of the Part I of the assessment 6/6 (100%) of the candidates earned scores in the acceptable or target ranges. In one implementations of the Part II of the assessment 6/6 (100%) of the candidates earned scores in the acceptable or target ranges. Candidate’s scores for the MARC 245, 3XX, 4XX, and 8XX fields were low in comparison to recent r implementations of the assessment, candidates have scored at the on average at the target levels. This was the last implementation of this assessment which has been replaced by a new assessment #8 titled, Pathfinder. No specific actions recommended other than the formative assessment of the new Assessment # 8 – Pathfinder. AY13: Have the change(s) in response to data that you documented last year had the desired effect on your program? Please provide specifics referencing prior changes that you submitted in Fall 2012, covering AY 2011-2012.
R.2.4.g.24.docx