13. In which of the following scenarios can the seizure of a person occur? a. When a police officer simply questions a person b. When a police officer is in pursuit of a person c. When he or she is arrested and taken to the police station for questioning d. All of the above 14. One way to determine if a Fourth Amendment seizure has occurred is to ask if a reasonable person would believe that he or she is: a. free to post bail. b. speak to an attorney. c. free to leave. d. none of the above. 15. In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer’s conduct in conjunction with the questioning would convince a reasonable person that he or she is not free to leave? a. Terry v. Ohio b. Dunaway v. New York c. California v. Hodari D d. Brinegar v. United States 16. This term refers to more than bare suspicion; it exists when facts and circumstances “the within [the officers’] knowledge and of which they [have] reasonably trustworthy information [are] sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the [suspect] had committed or was committing an offense.” a. Reasonable suspicion b. Justification c. Probable cause d. Administrative justification 17. Justification that below probable cause but above a hunch is referred to as: a. Reasonable suspicion. b. Probable cause. c. Justification. d. Administrative justification. 18. Which level of justification is required for stops and investigative detentions that fall short of arrests? a. Reasonable suspicion b. Probable cause c. Justification d. Administrative justification
13. In which of the following scenarios can the seizure of a person occur? a. When a police officer simply questions a person b. When a police officer is in pursuit of a person c. When he or she is arrested and taken to the police station for questioning d. All of the above 14. One way to determine if a Fourth Amendment seizure has occurred is to ask if a reasonable person would believe that he or she is: a. free to post bail. b. speak to an attorney. c. free to leave. d. none of the above. 15. In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer’s conduct in conjunction with the questioning would convince a reasonable person that he or she is not free to leave? a. Terry v. Ohio b. Dunaway v. New York c. California v. Hodari D d. Brinegar v. United States 16. This term refers to more than bare suspicion; it exists when “the facts and circumstances within [the officers’] knowledge and of which they [have] reasonably trustworthy information [are] sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the [suspect] had committed or was committing an offense.” a. Reasonable suspicion b. Justification c. Probable cause d. Administrative justification 17. Justification that below probable cause but above a hunch is referred to as: a. Reasonable suspicion. b. Probable cause. c. Justification. d. Administrative justification. 18. Which level of justification is required for stops and investigative detentions that fall short of arrests? a. Reasonable suspicion b. Probable cause c. Justification d. Administrative justification
Quiz%202%20-%202015.docx