Women by planned place of birth Study ref LoE N Aim/ methods Findings Comments III-2 258,161 Aim: to determine whether a retrospective Pre-eclampsia was reported in 1.1% of () linked data study using routinely collected women who planned to give birth in the data was a viable means to compare hospital, 0.6% of women who planned perinatal and maternal outcomes and to give birth in a birth centre and 0.1% interventions in labour by planned place of of women who planned to give birth at birth at the onset of labour in one Australian home (p<0.001). state. Methods: A population-based cohort study was undertaken using routinely collected linked data from the NSW Perinatal Data Collection, Admitted Patient Data Collection, Register of Congenital Conditions, Registry of Birth Deaths and Marriages and the Australian Bureau of Statistics over 8 years.
Women by planned place of birth Study ref LoE N Aim/ methods Findings Comments () III-2 258,161 Aim: to determine whether a retrospective linked data study using routinely collected data was a viable means to compare perinatal and maternal outcomes and interventions in labour by planned place of birth at the onset of labour in one Australian state. Methods: A population-based cohort study was undertaken using routinely collected linked data from the NSW Perinatal Data Collection, Admitted Patient Data Collection, Register of Congenital Conditions, Registry of Birth Deaths and Marriages and the Australian Bureau of Statistics over 8 years. Pre-eclampsia was reported in 1.1% of women who planned to give birth in the hospital, 0.6% of women who planned to give birth in a birth centre and 0.1% of women who planned to give birth at home (p<0.001).
Preeclampsia%20evaluation%20report%2016May17.docx