Purpose A Personal Review and Development Plan (PRDP) is a summary of past achievements and a review of expectations regarding work at Imperial. It includes a review of career and personal development and identifies a programme of work and skills/resource development that will assist you in reaching your goals. The review should comprise a frank and confidential discussion with your reviewer. It is NOT a replacement for regular meetings with your line manager concerning detailed tasks, nor does it form part of formal HR mechanisms such as promotion or re-grading. As the name indicates, it is a PERSONAL review providing an opportunity for you to reflect on your work, your role within Imperial, and your future. Preparation Both reviewee and reviewer should come to the PRDP meeting with notes and ideas covering all aspects of the reviewee’s contributions to Imperial. The list below provides prompts for both the pre-meeting preparation and the conduct of the meeting itself. Not all jobs encompass all the responsibilities shown below. Please complete those parts that are appropriate. Part 1a. Review of last year’s work – to be completed by the reviewee before the meeting Your Achievements /Outputs 1 = Outstanding Objectives/Main Areas of 2 = Highly Effective Indicate an achievement level (not compulsory) and include: Responsibility 3 = Effective What has gone well/not so well and why? What gave you the most/least satisfaction? What has caused you problems or 4 = Less than Effective difficulties? 5 = Unacceptably Low Research/Applications Your comments: Milestones reached, quality of output, technical skills, time management, Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): fellowships or funding applications, barriers/obstacles, etc. Publications/Conference Your comments: Attendance Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): Your comments: Internal Contribution Grant writing, lab management, reviewing colleague’s draft publications, teaching and Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): supervision, etc. External Visibility Your comments: Public outreach, science blogs, peer reviewing, committees, professional Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): membership, etc. Your comments: Networking and Collaboration (if applicable) Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): Your comments: Does your experience and practice match , and how do you support equality, diversity and inclusion? Reviewer’s comments (following discussion):
Purpose A Personal Review and Development Plan (PRDP) is a summary of past achievements and a review of expectations regarding work at Imperial. It includes a review of career and personal development and identifies a programme of work and skills/resource development that will assist you in reaching your goals. The review should comprise a frank and confidential discussion with your reviewer. It is NOT a replacement for regular meetings with your line manager concerning detailed tasks, nor does it form part of formal HR mechanisms such as promotion or re-grading. As the name indicates, it is a PERSONAL review providing an opportunity for you to reflect on your work, your role within Imperial, and your future. Preparation Both reviewee and reviewer should come to the PRDP meeting with notes and ideas covering all aspects of the reviewee’s contributions to Imperial. The list below provides prompts for both the pre-meeting preparation and the conduct of the meeting itself. Not all jobs encompass all the responsibilities shown below. Please complete those parts that are appropriate. Part 1a. Review of last year’s work – to be completed by the reviewee before the meeting Objectives/Main Areas of Responsibility Your Achievements /Outputs Indicate an achievement level (not compulsory) and include: What has gone well/not so well and why? What gave you the most/least satisfaction? What has caused you problems or difficulties? 1 = Outstanding 2 = Highly Effective 3 = Effective 4 = Less than Effective 5 = Unacceptably Low Research/Applications Milestones reached, quality of output, technical skills, time management, fellowships or funding applications, barriers/obstacles, etc. Your comments: Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): Publications/Conference Attendance Your comments: Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): Internal Contribution Grant writing, lab management, reviewing colleague’s draft publications, teaching and supervision, etc. Your comments: Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): External Visibility Public outreach, science blogs, peer reviewing, committees, professional membership, etc. Your comments: Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): Networking and Collaboration (if applicable) Your comments: Reviewer’s comments (following discussion): Does your experience and practice match , and how do you support equality, diversity and inclusion? Your comments: Reviewer’s comments (following discussion):
PRDP-Form-Research-Family-Postdoc-and-Fellow.docx