PART III - SUMMARY MATRIX OF KRAs AND INDICATORS KEY RESULT INDICATORS CRITERIA ELEMENTS POSSIBLE OUTCOMES (KRAs) KRA 1: Core Criterion: The institution’s G1a - Probity Alignment of Governance and Indicator: governance arrangements G1b - Strategic Vision Organizational Culture with Management Governance demonstrate probity/integrity, G1c - Accountability VMG strategic vision, accountability, G1d - Awareness and Quality of institutional awareness and management of risk, Management of Risk performance and effective monitoring of G1e - Effective Effective structures performance. Monitoring of Performance Core Criterion: The institution’s M1a - Management of Support of stakeholders Indicator: management of operations, Operations Sustainability of operations Management financial control, and quality M1b - Financial Control Responsive programs and assurance arrangements give the M1c - Quality Assurance development plans HEI the opportunity to respond to Arrangements Continuous quality development and change. improvement (CQI) in management Indicator: Criterion: The institution has EF1a - Use of ICT in Efficient and effective Enabling enabling features that help improve Management operations Features the operations, quality, and EF1b - Resource Achievement of responsive development, such as 1) the use of Generation Strategies development plans Information and Communications EF1c- Other Enabling Technology (ICT) for more efficient Features and effective management; and 2) viable, sustainable, and appropriate resource generation strategies to support its development plans.
PART III - SUMMARY MATRIX OF KRAs AND INDICATORS KEY RESULT (KRAs) INDICATORS CRITERIA ELEMENTS POSSIBLE OUTCOMES KRA 1: Governance and Management Core Indicator: Governance Criterion: The institution’s governance arrangements demonstrate probity/integrity, strategic vision, accountability, awareness and management of risk, and effective monitoring of performance. G1a - Probity G1b - Strategic Vision G1c - Accountability G1d - Awareness and Management of Risk G1e - Effective Monitoring of Performance Alignment of Organizational Culture with VMG Quality of institutional performance Effective structures Core Indicator: Management Criterion: The institution’s management of operations, financial control, and quality assurance arrangements give the HEI the opportunity to respond to development and change. M1a - Management of Operations M1b - Financial Control M1c - Quality Assurance Arrangements Support of stakeholders Sustainability of operations Responsive programs and development plans Continuous quality improvement (CQI) in management Indicator: Enabling Features Criterion: The institution has enabling features that help improve the operations, quality, and development, such as 1) the use of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) for more efficient and effective management; and 2) viable, sustainable, and appropriate resource generation strategies to support its development plans. EF1a - Use of ICT in Management EF1b - Resource Generation Strategies EF1c- Other Enabling Features Efficient and effective operations Achievement of responsive development plans
Revised-ISA-SED_Final-Version_April-2017.docx