Please double check the alignment to standards. material’s Alignment to Idaho Content Standards: _____% correlation **If the material aligns to the Idaho Content Standards with at least an 80%, move on to: Material Analysis. If the material has less than an 80% alignment, please notify your team leader. Materials Analysis: Directions: Complete one form for each textbook /program you evaluate. In your evaluation, you are asked to consider the materials according to the criteria below. First, take each individual criterion and rate the material using the following standard: 0 (Inadequate), .5 (Partially Meets), and 1.0 (Meets or Exceeds). Use the comment and notes sections to give the reasons for your ratings, citing unit/lesson whenever possible. Inadequate Partially Meets or Comments/Examples 0 Meets Exceeds Objectives 0.5 1.0 (Publisher and Reviewer) Objectives are generally aligned with Idaho Professional-Technical Education Performance Standards. The scope and sequence of the content is well organized and comprehensive. The objectives covered require the students to use higher level cognitive skills (analysis, synthesis, evaluations, etc.). Instructional plans and teaching suggestions provide for efficient adaptation of materials for a variety of performance skill levels and learning styles. Objectives integrate relevant performance, creative, and assessment. Quality supplemental teacher materials are available for this text. Inadequate Partially Meets Meets or 0 0.5 Exceeds Content 1.0 The content incorporates and supports current performance practices. The opportunities for differentiation. teacher’s guide provides Concepts and skills are presented in tandem. The text effectively integrates technology.
Please double check the material’s alignment to standards. Alignment to Idaho Content Standards: _____% correlation **If the material aligns to the Idaho Content Standards with at least an 80%, move on to: Material Analysis. If the material has less than an 80% alignment, please notify your team leader. Materials Analysis: Directions: Complete one form for each textbook /program you evaluate. In your evaluation, you are asked to consider the materials according to the criteria below. First, take each individual criterion and rate the material using the following standard: 0 (Inadequate), .5 (Partially Meets), and 1.0 (Meets or Exceeds). Use the comment and notes sections to give the reasons for your ratings, citing unit/lesson whenever possible. Objectives Comments/Examples (Publisher and Reviewer) Inadequate 0 Partially Meets 0.5 Meets or Exceeds 1.0 Objectives are generally aligned with Idaho Professional-Technical Education Performance Standards. The scope and sequence of the content is well organized and comprehensive. The objectives covered require the students to use higher level cognitive skills (analysis, synthesis, evaluations, etc.). Instructional plans and teaching suggestions provide for efficient adaptation of materials for a variety of performance skill levels and learning styles. Objectives integrate relevant performance, creative, and assessment. Quality supplemental teacher materials are available for this text. Content Inadequate 0 Partially Meets 0.5 Meets or Exceeds 1.0 The content incorporates and supports current performance practices. The teacher’s guide provides opportunities for differentiation. Concepts and skills are presented in tandem. The text effectively integrates technology.
Precision-Machining-Levels-I-III-PTE-Evaluation-Form.docx