opportunities for the Course includes frequent are present are not taken or those present summative assessments and appropriate methods to would negatively impact mastery of student success assess students’ content Action Plan: Required for all of and “Area Improvement” “Significant Issue” Feedback and Course grading policies, Course grading policies and There are no course Meets “Satisfactory” students have easy access including, rubrics, expectations are not clearly grading policies or to a well designed and expectations for timely communicated expectations gradebook feedback and consequences of late submissions, are clearly stated in the course information area or syllabus Action Plan: Required for all of and “Area Improvement” “Significant Issue” Weight and Assessments are given The weighting of There is a significant Meets “Satisfactory” grade weight schema aligns appropriate weight to ensure assessments is potentially break between the with the programmatic vision that the summative misaligned to student method for determining or guidelines assessments are critical for mastery of the course the course grade and passing the course outcomes demonstration of competency Action Plan: Required for all of and “Area Improvement” “Significant Issue” Instruction The instructional materials of the course promote student engagement and meaningful learning. Critical Elements Exemplary Satisfactory Area of Improvement Significant Issue Scaffolding Meets and All instructional materials Some instructional materials Instructional materials are “Satisfactory” instructional materials have direct relevance and are non-essential or only systemically irrelevant or
opportunities for the summative assessments Course includes frequent and appropriate methods to assess students’ mastery of content are present are not taken or those present would negatively impact student success Action Plan: Required for all “Area of Improvement” and “Significant Issue” Feedback Meets “Satisfactory” and students have easy access to a well designed and gradebook Course grading policies, including, rubrics, expectations for timely feedback and consequences of late submissions, are clearly stated in the course information area or syllabus Course grading policies and expectations are not clearly communicated There are no course grading policies or expectations Action Plan: Required for all “Area of Improvement” and “Significant Issue” Weight Meets “Satisfactory” and grade weight schema aligns with the programmatic vision or guidelines Assessments are given appropriate weight to ensure that the summative assessments are critical for passing the course The weighting of assessments is potentially misaligned to student mastery of the course outcomes There is a significant break between the method for determining the course grade and demonstration of competency Action Plan: Required for all “Area of Improvement” and “Significant Issue” Instruction The instructional materials of the course promote student engagement and meaningful learning. Critical Elements Exemplary Satisfactory Area of Improvement Significant Issue Scaffolding Meets “Satisfactory” and instructional materials All instructional materials have direct relevance and Some instructional materials are non-essential or only Instructional materials are systemically irrelevant or
Quality-Assurance-Rubric.docx