ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR ACTION RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM Presenter: Evaluator: Directions: Circle number corresponding with the description that most closely matches your observation of each element. Element: Beginning Developing Average Above Exemplary 1 2 3 Average 5 4 1 Disjointed 3 Font easy to read, clear 5 Visually effective, evidences Poster 2 4 titles and subheadings careful preparation Appearance Text/ Charts/ 1 Misspellings, grammatical errors 3 Could have been better 5 Conveys underlying meaning 2 4 Tables represented or expanded of research findings and upon implications for practice 1 Not clearly stated, topic not 3 May need further 5 Clearly & cogently stated, Purpose of 2 4 Study clearly supported by literature clarification, literature clearly supported by review not exhaustive literature, including different perspectives, threats to validity Study Design 1 Not thoroughly explained, 3 Adequately executed & 5 Meticulously crafted, 2 4 inappropriate, or incomplete. described research sophisticated details may design, context, include sample size & power, population, instruments replicable procedures, & & procedures. attention to validity Briefly communicated, statistical tests not relevant or Presented performed completely, Clearly and concisely Results 1 3 5 2 4 improperly additional or different communicated, show mastery tests could generate more of statistical testing and effective results interpretation Conclusions 1 Not supported by data, limitations 3 Warranted, limitations 5 Strong implications for 2 4 and recommendations not identified but could be changing future practice, addressed expanded limitations clearly identified Overall 1 Quickly executed, needs more 3 Well-executed, solid 5 Very impressive example of 2 4 work attempt at inquiry, all important and well-presented Impression elements included, some research could use further refinement Comments:
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR ACTION RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM Presenter: Evaluator: Directions: Circle number corresponding with the description that most closely matches your observation of each element. Element: Beginning 1 Developing 2 Average 3 Above Average 4 Exemplary 5 Poster Appearance 1 Disjointed 2 3 Font easy to read, clear titles and subheadings 4 5 Visually effective, evidences careful preparation Text/ Charts/ Tables 1 Misspellings, grammatical errors 2 3 Could have been better represented or expanded upon 4 5 Conveys underlying meaning of research findings and implications for practice Purpose of Study 1 Not clearly stated, topic not clearly supported by literature 2 3 May need further clarification, literature review not exhaustive 4 5 Clearly & cogently stated, clearly supported by literature, including different perspectives, threats to validity Study Design 1 Not thoroughly explained, inappropriate, or incomplete. 2 3 Adequately executed & described research design, context, population, instruments & procedures. 4 5 Meticulously crafted, sophisticated details may include sample size & power, replicable procedures, & attention to validity Results 1 Briefly communicated, statistical tests not relevant or performed improperly 2 3 Presented completely, additional or different tests could generate more effective results 4 5 Clearly and concisely communicated, show mastery of statistical testing and interpretation Conclusions 1 Not supported by data, limitations and recommendations not addressed 2 3 Warranted, limitations identified but could be expanded 4 5 Strong implications for changing future practice, limitations clearly identified Overall Impression 1 Quickly executed, needs more work 2 3 Well-executed, solid attempt at inquiry, all elements included, some could use further refinement 4 5 Very impressive example of important and well-presented research Comments:
Practicum%20Internship%20Handbook%20-%20Fall%2015.docx