Additional Comments on Part I: # CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Comment(s) B.1-4 TURN submitted its NOI within 30 days of the initial prehearing conference held in this docket on January 20, 2016. Pursuant to Rule 17.1(f), TURN submitted a Supplemental Notice of Intent to Claim Compensation on June 13, 2016 for participation in a related federal court matter filed by several parties to this proceeding on May 5, 2016. TURN filed its first substantive pleadings in the federal court matter on May 12, 2016 and was granted intervenor defendant status in that proceeding on May Supplemental 18, 2016, thus TURN’s NOI was timely filed 30 days after the date TURN first filed a pleading in the judicial review proceeding. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Claimed Intervenor’s Contribution(s) 1. Order Instituting Investigation Verified Summary and Background November 12, 2015 (“OII”), When the Commission adopted its Order Instituting Investigation to open this ALJ/ACR Ruling on Pending proceeding in 2015, stakeholders Motions and Schedule, anticipated a comprehensive yet February 4, 2016. contentious litigation intended to Resolution ALJ-328, provide the Commission with data and March 1, 2016 analysis to help define its (categorization). telecommunications policy roadmap. Opening Testimony of Susan The events in this proceeding confirmed Baldwin on behalf of TURN in the predictions. This proceeding was Response to Information procedurally and substantively Requests, March 15, 2016. complicated and contentious, yet advocates and expert witnesses TURN’s Direct Testimony of Trevor fully participated in all aspects of the Roycroft on behalf of TURN in
Additional Comments on Part I: # Intervenor’s Comment(s) CPUC Discussion B.1-4 TURN submitted its NOI within 30 days of the initial prehearing conference held in this docket on January 20, 2016. Pursuant to Rule 17.1(f), TURN submitted a Supplemental Notice of Intent to Claim Compensation on June 13, 2016 for participation in a related federal court matter filed by several parties to this proceeding on May 5, 2016. TURN filed its first substantive pleadings in the federal court matter on May 12, 2016 and was granted intervenor defendant status in that proceeding on May 18, 2016, thus TURN’s Supplemental NOI was timely filed 30 days after the date TURN first filed a pleading in the judicial review proceeding. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion 1. Summary and Background When the Commission adopted its Order Instituting Investigation to open this proceeding in 2015, stakeholders anticipated a comprehensive yet contentious litigation intended to provide the Commission with data and analysis to help define its telecommunications policy roadmap. The events in this proceeding confirmed the predictions. This proceeding was procedurally and substantively complicated and contentious, yet TURN’s advocates and expert witnesses fully participated in all aspects of the Order Instituting Investigation (“OII”), November 12, 2015 ALJ/ACR Ruling on Pending Motions and Schedule, February 4, 2016. Resolution ALJ-328, March 1, 2016 (categorization). Opening Testimony of Susan Baldwin on behalf of TURN in Response to Information Requests, March 15, 2016. Direct Testimony of Trevor Roycroft on behalf of TURN in Verified
183284931.docx