VII. Project Reports Successful applicants will be required to submit a final report within sixty (60) days after the termination date of the subcontract. Report formats and instructions for submitting will be provided by the Center. VIII. Proposal Evaluation Sheet Criteria IPM Documents Seed Capstone Working Group Resource for appropriate Potential to Builds on and Potential to building, involvement of catalyze or enhances coordinate, investment stakeholders in the PMSP facilitate future previous work on catalyze and or process effective projects this issue produce synergies utilization Appropriate plan to include Stakeholder Stakeholder Stakeholder (15 points) experts in production interest and interest and interest and and/or review involvement involvement involvement Regional Fill key gaps in the current Addresses important issues, citing indicators such as Importance CP/PMSP/Priorities stakeholder priorities, value of the crop/setting, contribution and portfolios of the issue to environmental, economic and human health potential for risk, etc. Importance in the Southern beneficial Region of setting(s) impact addressed (25 points) Potential Will use standard formats Logical targeting of the issue by the project for success and procedures and Appropriate project design involve staff (25 points) Impact Exempt Plan to assess project outcomes and impacts evaluation OR (15 points) Plan to produce new baseline evaluation information OR A combination of aspects of both Proposal Meets all format Meets all format requirements. preparation requirements explanation of issues addressed and what the project (10 points) could provide Budget Detailed budget justification corresponding to project scope, objectives and procedures (10 points) For questions regarding the Request for Applications or submission of a proposal, contact Jim VanKirk, Director (jim@sripmc.org , 919 513 8179). For technical questions
VII. Project Reports Successful applicants will be required to submit a final report within sixty (60) days after the termination date of the subcontract. Report formats and instructions for submitting will be provided by the Center. VIII. Proposal Evaluation Sheet Criteria IPM Documents Seed Capstone Working Group Resource building, investment or utilization (15 points) for appropriate involvement of stakeholders in the PMSP process Appropriate plan to include experts in production and/or review Potential to catalyze or facilitate future effective projects Stakeholder interest and involvement Builds on and enhances previous work on this issue Stakeholder interest and involvement Potential to coordinate, catalyze and produce synergies Stakeholder interest and involvement Regional Importance and potential for beneficial impact (25 points) Fill key gaps in the current CP/PMSP/Priorities portfolios Importance in the Southern Region of setting(s) addressed Addresses important issues, citing indicators such as stakeholder priorities, value of the crop/setting, contribution of the issue to environmental, economic and human health risk, etc. Potential for success (25 points) Will use standard formats and procedures and involve staff Logical targeting of the issue by the project Appropriate project design Impact evaluation (15 points) Exempt Plan to assess project outcomes and impacts OR Plan to produce new baseline evaluation information OR A combination of aspects of both Proposal preparation (10 points) Meets all format requirements Meets all format requirements. explanation of issues addressed and what the project could provide Budget (10 points) Detailed budget justification corresponding to project scope, objectives and procedures For questions regarding the Request for Applications or submission of a proposal, contact Jim VanKirk, Director (jim@sripmc.org , 919 513 8179). For technical questions
RFA79.docx