Thus, Reid made a substantial contribution to the of the Commission’s resolution Developer Refunds issue. 3. Ratepayer Refunds Reid argued that are not Verified “Deposits which refunded should be credited to the IOU’s Energy Resource Recovery Account (ERRA). Thus, the credit of deposits will serve to reduce the overall level of ratepayer procurement (Reid FIT costs.” Comments, p. 5) Although the Commission did not adopt recommendation, Reid made a Reid’s substantial contribution to the of the Ratepayer Commission’s resolution Refunds issue. 4. System Impact Study Reid recommended that developer be Verified “a limited to one system impact study while remaining in the BioMAT queue. If a developer drops out of the queue and then re-enters the queue at a later date, the developer should be allowed to conduct an updated system impact (Reid FIT study.” Comments, p. 5) Although the Commission did not adopt recommendation, Reid made a Reid’s substantial contribution to the of the System Commission’s resolution Impact Study issue. 5. Compliance Periods Reid recommended that Commission Verified, however “The should establish the following compliance comments Reid’s periods for SB 350 implementation regarding purposes: 2016-2018, 2019-2020, compliance 2021-2024, 2025-2027, and 2028-2030. periods prior to (Comments of L. Jan Reid on the 2020 did not Implementation of Senate Bill 350, substantially May 5, 2016 (Reid SB350 Comments), contribute. “Reid p. 4. asserts that SB 350 requires a new The Commission adopted Reid’s configuration of recommendation on compliance periods the compliance beginning in 2021. (D.16-12-040, slip op. periods from at 1) 2016-2020. (Reid
Thus, Reid made a substantial contribution to the Commission’s resolution of the Developer Refunds issue. 3. Ratepayer Refunds Reid argued that “Deposits which are not refunded should be credited to the IOU’s Energy Resource Recovery Account (ERRA). Thus, the credit of deposits will serve to reduce the overall level of ratepayer procurement costs.” (Reid FIT Comments, p. 5) Although the Commission did not adopt Reid’s recommendation, Reid made a substantial contribution to the Commission’s resolution of the Ratepayer Refunds issue. Verified 4. System Impact Study Reid recommended that “a developer be limited to one system impact study while remaining in the BioMAT queue. If a developer drops out of the queue and then re-enters the queue at a later date, the developer should be allowed to conduct an updated system impact study.” (Reid FIT Comments, p. 5) Although the Commission did not adopt Reid’s recommendation, Reid made a substantial contribution to the Commission’s resolution of the System Impact Study issue. Verified 5. Compliance Periods Reid recommended that “The Commission should establish the following compliance periods for SB 350 implementation purposes: 2016-2018, 2019-2020, 2021-2024, 2025-2027, and 2028-2030. (Comments of L. Jan Reid on the Implementation of Senate Bill 350, May 5, 2016 (Reid SB350 Comments), p. 4. The Commission adopted Reid’s recommendation on compliance periods beginning in 2021. (D.16-12-040, slip op. at 1) Verified, however Reid’s comments regarding compliance periods prior to 2020 did not substantially contribute. “Reid asserts that SB 350 requires a new configuration of the compliance periods from 2016-2020. (Reid
183273938.docx