Annex 8. Standard UNDP Risk Log Project Title: Strategic Planning and Action to strengthen climate resilience of Rural Communities Project ID: in Nusa Tenggara Timor Date: March 2012 Date # Description Risk Type Risk Level Risk Management Identified 1 Provincial and/or district March Political The risk would prevent the project from The project will raise awareness, governments fail to 2012 delivering its Outcome 1(Institutional capacitate and work closely with parliament allocate funding to climate capacity developed to integrate climate and senior government officials, while resilience due to resilience in sustainable development) simultaneously undertaking a highly visible competing interests media campaign to highlight the Risk Level: Medium importance to the general public of investing in climate resilience for the benefit of the people of NTT. 2 Coordination amongst 2012 Regulatory, The risk prevent the project from This risk will be mitigated by strong government agencies will Institutional delivering its Outcome 1(Institutional leadership from senior government be ineffective due to the capacity developed to integrate climate officials, and highlighting the opportunities large number of resilience in sustainable development) and benefits of cooperation across government institutes institutes. The project has already started involved and sectoral Risk Level: Medium to map out relevant programmes of thinking, and different institutes, and this will be expanded reporting lines throughout the project duration. Information will be broadly shared to identify synergies, opportunities for cooperation between agencies, and minimize the risks of duplication. During multistakeholder discussions, the facilitation will focus on identifying the common issues, creating common goals and actions that will be of benefit to all stakeholders. 3 Bureaucratic processes March Capacity The risk would prevent the project from Risk mitigation measures include the hamper the active 2012 delivering its Outcome 2 (Livelihoods assurance of firm buy-in from both senior involvement of government and sources of income diversified and management and their staff of the institutes in project strengthened for vulnerable rural institutes, and provide training and activities communities in a changing climate) coaching, and showcasing the value of involvement for their day to day work and Risk Level: Medium programmes. It is expected that by
Annex 8. Standard UNDP Risk Log Project Title: Strategic Planning and Action to strengthen climate resilience of Rural Communities in Nusa Tenggara Timor Project ID: Date: March 2012 # Description Date Identified Risk Type Risk Level Risk Management 1 Provincial and/or district governments fail to allocate funding to climate resilience due to competing interests March 2012 Political The risk would prevent the project from delivering its Outcome 1(Institutional capacity developed to integrate climate resilience in sustainable development) Risk Level: Medium The project will raise awareness, capacitate and work closely with parliament and senior government officials, while simultaneously undertaking a highly visible media campaign to highlight the importance to the general public of investing in climate resilience for the benefit of the people of NTT. 2 Coordination amongst government agencies will be ineffective due to the large number of government institutes involved and sectoral thinking, and different reporting lines 2012 Regulatory, Institutional The risk prevent the project from delivering its Outcome 1(Institutional capacity developed to integrate climate resilience in sustainable development) Risk Level: Medium This risk will be mitigated by strong leadership from senior government officials, and highlighting the opportunities and benefits of cooperation across institutes. The project has already started to map out relevant programmes of institutes, and this will be expanded throughout the project duration. Information will be broadly shared to identify synergies, opportunities for cooperation between agencies, and minimize the risks of duplication. During multistakeholder discussions, the facilitation will focus on identifying the common issues, creating common goals and actions that will be of benefit to all stakeholders. 3 Bureaucratic processes hamper the active involvement of government institutes in project activities March 2012 Capacity The risk would prevent the project from delivering its Outcome 2 (Livelihoods and sources of income diversified and strengthened for vulnerable rural communities in a changing climate) Risk Level: Medium Risk mitigation measures include the assurance of firm buy-in from both senior management and their staff of the institutes, and provide training and coaching, and showcasing the value of involvement for their day to day work and programmes. It is expected that by
re-submission_4549_indonesia_sccf_sparc_prodoc_revised_14sept2012.docx