For a project, the project In defining project 1 = Four of the requirements, how many of scope is driven by the OAF, and statements are true the following statements are Fit-up Standards as well as 2 = Three of the true? typical terms and conditions of statements are true PWGSC leases. 3 = Two of the statements the requirements can be are true. Typical defined with very few people. 4 = One of the statements 1-2 the requirements can be is true. In the notes identify which (if defined in a short period of 5 = None of the time. Asset any) statements are not true: statements are true. there are a small number of 4-5 a) individual requirements to define. b) the requirements do not require a high degree of c) detail. d) Feasibility studies should not be Information availability for 1 = Feasibility studies are interpreted as the NPMS planning, integration, and not required. development feasibility report. 2 = All sources/methods To what extent have available have been employed sources/methods been but have not been verified. employed and verified to project: provide information for this 3 = Some Only score 2 if additional - sources/methods project as applicable (e.g. technical studies are required. have been employed. research, consultations, 4 = Few sources/methods workshops, surveys, and Lease project: have been employed. existing documentation)? NPMS projects score 1, all “Lite” 5 = No information has others score 2. been gathered or is available. All projects should comply with Have the business 1 = Yes requirements been validated NPMS. 3 = Validation is a with with an appropriate planned activity but 1 technique, such as has not yet been workshops, and completed. independent verification and 5 = No validation? See question #52 Have feasibility studies been 1 = Feasibility studies are conducted and is there not required, because - confidence in the none of the requirements assumptions made in the feasibility studies?
In defining project requirements, how many of the following statements are true? the requirements can be defined with very few people. the requirements can be defined in a short period of time. there are a small number of individual requirements to define. the requirements do not require a high degree of detail. 1 = Four of the statements are true 2 = Three of the statements are true 3 = Two of the statements are true. 4 = One of the statements is true. 5 = None of the statements are true. For a project, the project scope is driven by the OAF, and Fit-up Standards as well as typical terms and conditions of PWGSC leases. In the notes identify which (if any) statements are not true: a) b) c) d) Typical 1-2 Asset 4-5 Information availability for planning, integration, and development To what extent have available sources/methods been employed and verified to provide information for this project as applicable (e.g. research, consultations, workshops, surveys, and existing documentation)? 1 = Feasibility studies are not required. 2 = All sources/methods have been employed but have not been verified. 3 = Some sources/methods have been employed. 4 = Few sources/methods have been employed. 5 = No information has been gathered or is available. Feasibility studies should not be interpreted as the NPMS feasibility report. project: Only score 2 if additional technical studies are required. Lease project: NPMS “Lite” projects score 1, all others score 2. - Have the business requirements been validated with with an appropriate technique, such as workshops, and independent verification and validation? 1 = Yes 3 = Validation is a planned activity but has not yet been completed. 5 = No All projects should comply with NPMS. 1 Have feasibility studies been conducted and is there confidence in the assumptions made in the feasibility studies? 1 = Feasibility studies are not required, because none of the requirements See question #52 -
risqueproj-riskmnl-eng.docx