% of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% in READING (L2 or above) % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% in WRITING (L2 or above) % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% in MATHS (L2 or above) Key Stage 2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 (6 pupils) (9 pupils) (3 pupils) (6 pupils) (3 pupils) % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress 83% 89% 100% 100% 100% in READING (L4 or above) % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress 83% 100% 100% 67% 100% in WRITING (L4 or above) % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress 100% 89% 100% 83% 100% in MATHS (L4 or above) Summary of PPG spending 2015/16 Objectives in spending PPG: To narrow the attainment gap in English and maths by accelerating rates of progress for disadvantaged pupils.
% of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress in READING (L2 or above) 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress in WRITING (L2 or above) 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress in MATHS (L2 or above) 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% Key Stage 2 2012 (6 pupils) 2013 (9 pupils) 2014 (3 pupils) 2015 (6 pupils) 2016 (3 pupils) % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress in READING (L4 or above) 83% 89% 100% 100% 100% % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress in WRITING (L4 or above) 83% 100% 100% 67% 100% % of disadvantaged pupils making expected progress in MATHS (L4 or above) 100% 89% 100% 83% 100% Summary of PPG spending 2015/16 Objectives in spending PPG: To narrow the attainment gap in English and maths by accelerating rates of progress for disadvantaged pupils.
report-to-govs-2015-2016.docx