Making our traditions of understanding Fragmented 1. Integration 2. Conflicts ”clearer“ Assume and Embrace uncertainty TIME - rushing to solve without time to Embracing emergence reflect The wisdom and humility of elders Experiencing listened to Trust the process Being part of something so good - Emotionally + intellectually feelings of humility disconnected Embraced by beauty Knowledge is power and the North / Genuine care for humanity has it Information exchange “West” Technological and technocentric Over whelming optimism Confusion Too much conceptual ideas / less Ideas practical solution / action Insights Multicultural system thinking, but can´t Teaching & transfer take due to task + activity Happiness Unexpected things e. g. task, program Knowledge activity Research & application Too many + instructions Making impacts → confusion Recreation of Reality Need Balance of diverse backgrounds in Diversity-logic? a table Choreography of utilizing Defining the bounds and scales within system are applied Tendency to maximize output Start platforms for reaching mutual Juxtaposition of interests understudy Network communication Bring clarity to S.T., Through case Changing paradigms analysis Knowledge & education Need new definitions of community Awareness & interconnection is he?” World view “who Make new footsteps! (Through Hierarchy was a theme b/c it was substantial contributions to scholarship present / Praxis) Cyber-systemic as the answer was a Interdisciplinary scholarship needs fun theme b/c there are other “answers” their support too Different views towards a same big Representation is a b/c it wasn´t issue balanced Human relations cooperation, Confusion was a b/c expectations networks, communication etc. Happy-love was a theme b/c cooperation emphasis 1.5.3 Contracting In our experience, whenever an inquiry assembles we have found it important to spend time generating a about how we will work together. The contract also helps inform the design ‘contract’ of the inquiry. A few before the event, a draft contract was sent to all participants for review. In developing the contract, we invited participants to take a moment to think of all the ways they, or someone else, could make the two days together a bad experience. The process of contracting is designed to
Making our traditions of understanding ”clearer“ Assume and Embrace uncertainty Embracing emergence The wisdom and humility of elders Trust the process Emotionally + intellectually disconnected Knowledge is power and the North / “West” has it Technological and technocentric optimism Too much conceptual ideas / less practical solution / action Multicultural system thinking, but can´t take due to task + activity Unexpected things e. g. task, program activity Too many + instructions → confusion Need Balance of diverse backgrounds in a table Defining the bounds and scales within system are applied Start platforms for reaching mutual understudy Bring clarity to S.T., Through case analysis Need new definitions of community “who is he?” Make new footsteps! (Through substantial contributions to scholarship / Praxis) Interdisciplinary scholarship needs fun their support Different views towards a same big issue Human relations cooperation, networks, communication etc. Fragmented 1. Integration 2. Conflicts TIME - rushing to solve without time to reflect Experiencing listened to Being part of something so good - feelings of humility Embraced by beauty Genuine care for humanity Information exchange Over whelming Confusion Ideas Insights Teaching & transfer Happiness Knowledge Research & application Making impacts Recreation of Reality Diversity-logic? Choreography of utilizing Tendency to maximize output Juxtaposition of interests Network communication Changing paradigms Knowledge & education Awareness & interconnection World view Hierarchy was a theme b/c it was present Cyber-systemic as the answer was a theme b/c there are other “answers” too Representation is a b/c it wasn´t balanced Confusion was a b/c expectations Happy-love was a theme b/c cooperation emphasis 1.5.3 Contracting In our experience, whenever an inquiry assembles we have found it important to spend time generating a ‘contract’ about how we will work together. The contract also helps inform the design of the inquiry. A few before the event, a draft contract was sent to all participants for review. In developing the contract, we invited participants to take a moment to think of all the ways they, or someone else, could make the two days together a bad experience. The process of contracting is designed to
REPORT-A-Systemic-Inquiry-August-2016.docx