d Adult critical care Prioritisation category Outcome Short-listed by Cost, stakeholder priority Criterion1.1 Serious consequences to the patient Evidence x – burden DALYs 2011 Criterion 1.1 Serious consequences to the patient Evidence x – of total DALYs 2011 –% Criterion 1.1 Serious consequences to the patient Score 0.75 – Criterion 1.3 High cost to health system Evidence NHCDC $2.4 billion – – hospital cost Criterion 1.3 High cost to health system Evidence % of 7.11% – – total cost from NCCH Criterion 1.3 High cost to health system Score 1 – Criterion 2.2 Clinician support Evidence Leadership group Established leadership group - ANZICS CORE includes Adult Patient – – Database Criterion 2.2 Clinician support Evidence Current clinical Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society CORE registries – – quality registries Criterion 2.2 Clinician support Score 1 – Total score 2.75
d Adult critical care Prioritisation category Outcome Short-listed by Cost, stakeholder priority Criterion1.1 Serious consequences to the patient – Evidence burden DALYs 2011 x Criterion 1.1 Serious consequences to the patient – Evidence –% of total DALYs 2011 x Criterion 1.1 Serious consequences to the patient – Score 0.75 Criterion 1.3 High cost to health system – Evidence – NHCDC hospital cost $2.4 billion Criterion 1.3 High cost to health system – Evidence – % of total cost from NCCH 7.11% Criterion 1.3 High cost to health system – Score 1 Criterion 2.2 Clinician support – Evidence – Leadership group Established leadership group - ANZICS CORE includes Adult Patient Database Criterion 2.2 Clinician support – Evidence – Current clinical quality registries Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society CORE registries Criterion 2.2 Clinician support – Score 1 Total score 2.75
Prioritised-list-of-clinical-domains-for-clinical-quality-registry-development-Final-report-Nov-2016.docx