Potential supplier For information only N/A 1 information Grounds for mandatory 2 Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A exclusion Grounds for Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 3 discretionary exclusion Economic and Financial 4 Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A Standing Wider groups Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 5 Technical and Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 6 Professional Ability Modern Slavery Act Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 7 2015 Insurance Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 8.1 - Responses scored in line with 0 5 scoring 8.2 Additional Questions 100% system Thurrock Council will undertake an assessment and short-listing process as follows: Step 1: Any applicant whose SQ response does not satisfy all pass/fail criteria may be treated as ineligible for this contract opportunity and their SQ response will not be assessed further. Step 2: The remaining sections of the SQ response will be assessed and scored. Where an applicant fails to achieve the minimum of 2 on the scoring system for a section, Thurrock Council reserves the right to disqualify the applicant from the tender process and their SQ will not be assessed further. Step 3: The applicant’s scores will be ranked applying the weightings set out in the Assessment table above and the 4 highest scoring applicants will be shortlisted and invited to tender. Scoring System Where indicated, questions will be scored in line with the following scoring system: Using a 0 – 5 scoring system Unacceptable Response – No information provided or response does not address 0 the requirement. Poor response – The response contains material omissions and / or is supported 1 by limited evidence / examples. Major concerns that the organisation has the potential to deliver / that they have failed to meet a reasonable standard. Fair response – The response contains some omissions and / or is not well 2 supported by evidence / examples. Some concerns about the applicant’s ability to deliver / that they have failed to meet a reasonable standard. Good response – There is adequate detail / supporting examples giving a reasonable level of confidence in the Bidder’s experience and ability. The applicant 3 appears to have the potential to deliver as required / has met a reasonable standard and there are only minor concerns about the applicant’s experience.
1 Potential supplier information For information only N/A 2 Grounds for mandatory exclusion Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 3 Grounds for discretionary exclusion Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 4 Economic and Financial Standing Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 5 Wider groups Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 6 Technical and Professional Ability Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 7 Modern Slavery Act 2015 Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 8.1 Insurance Responses scored on a pass/fail basis N/A 8.2 Additional Questions Responses scored in line with 0 - 5 scoring system 100% Thurrock Council will undertake an assessment and short-listing process as follows: Step 1: Any applicant whose SQ response does not satisfy all pass/fail criteria may be treated as ineligible for this contract opportunity and their SQ response will not be assessed further. Step 2: The remaining sections of the SQ response will be assessed and scored. Where an applicant fails to achieve the minimum of 2 on the scoring system for a section, Thurrock Council reserves the right to disqualify the applicant from the tender process and their SQ will not be assessed further. Step 3: The applicant’s scores will be ranked applying the weightings set out in the Assessment table above and the 4 highest scoring applicants will be shortlisted and invited to tender. Scoring System Where indicated, questions will be scored in line with the following scoring system: Using a 0 – 5 scoring system 0 Unacceptable Response – No information provided or response does not address the requirement. 1 Poor response – The response contains material omissions and / or is supported by limited evidence / examples. Major concerns that the organisation has the potential to deliver / that they have failed to meet a reasonable standard. 2 Fair response – The response contains some omissions and / or is not well supported by evidence / examples. Some concerns about the applicant’s ability to deliver / that they have failed to meet a reasonable standard. 3 Good response – There is adequate detail / supporting examples giving a reasonable level of confidence in the Bidder’s experience and ability. The applicant appears to have the potential to deliver as required / has met a reasonable standard and there are only minor concerns about the applicant’s experience.
ps2018052-sq-belmontroad-v01.docx