3. Same as in Table 2 but for downwind-upwind latent heat flux differences (E) for each direction composite as presented in Table 1. a) DAY Rnet > 300 W Wind direction Lower 95% Upper 95% Skewness Kurtosis  E  category (W m-2) (W m-2) (W m-2) (W m-2) -1.70 39.88 -15.40 12.00 0.09 -0.36 EW 3.25 57.26 -8.48 14.98 -0.76 1.57 EOFF 3.58 44.15 -1.18 8.34 0.25 0.66 EON 31.20 41.05 14.25 48.14 0.64 0.45 EWSW 26.57 55.00 6.40 46.75 0.23 0.18 ESW 15.87 39.78 6.96 24.78 0.11 0.09 ESSW -8.42 40.10 -14.04 -2.80 0.09 0.86 ES-SSE
3. Same as in Table 2 but for downwind-upwind latent heat flux differences (E) for each direction composite as presented in Table 1. a) DAY Rnet > 300 W Wind direction  E  Lower 95% Upper 95% Skewness Kurtosis category (W m-2) (W m-2) (W m-2) (W m-2) EW -1.70 39.88 -15.40 12.00 0.09 -0.36 EOFF 3.25 57.26 -8.48 14.98 -0.76 1.57 EON 3.58 44.15 -1.18 8.34 0.25 0.66 EWSW 31.20 41.05 14.25 48.14 0.64 0.45 ESW 26.57 55.00 6.40 46.75 0.23 0.18 ESSW 15.87 39.78 6.96 24.78 0.11 0.09 ES-SSE -8.42 40.10 -14.04 -2.80 0.09 0.86
RAJEWSKI_PHD_DISSERTATION_rev.docx