Evaluation of the substantially responsive bids: There are which warrant loading of the bid prices. No other specific (state any conditions) evaluation criteria have been stipulated in the bidding document. The loading of the prices is therefore (specify the loading factor if none specify as NIL). As per Clause 4.5 of the Instructions to the Bidders, in order to qualify for award of the Contract, the substantially responsive bidders should meet the minimum qualifying criteria. Therefore the substantially responsive bids are evaluated against the following minimum qualifying criteria and evaluation table showing ranking of the bids are as follows: [for evaluation under new point based system(April 2011) attach the evaluation table showing the ranking of the bids generated from e-tool here]. Evaluation: In accordance with the Instruction to Bidders ITB 29, the work can be awarded to (insert name of Bidder) who has scored the maximum price preference score as shown in the above table. –financial Signature of the Evaluation Committee: 1. 2. 3. Enclosures: Copy of bidding document (Annex I) Copy of bid invitation and press advertisement (Annex II) Copies of amendment issued (Annex III) Minutes of bid opening (Annex IV) Determination table of responsiveness (Annex V) Minutes of pre-bid meeting (Annex VI) Comparative statement of offers (Annex VII) PRR-3 Sample Preliminary examination (Determination of responsiveness) Sl No. Name of Verification Eligibility Bid Substantial Acceptance bidders security of bid for detailed examination 1 A Yes No1 Yes Yes No No 2 B Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 C Yes Yes Yes No4 No No 4 D No2 Yes No3 Yes No No 5 E Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 F Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Government owned enterprise and legally not autonomous. 2 Trade license not valid
Evaluation of the substantially responsive bids: There are (state any conditions) which warrant loading of the bid prices. No other specific evaluation criteria have been stipulated in the bidding document. The loading of the prices is therefore (specify the loading factor if none specify as NIL). As per Clause 4.5 of the Instructions to the Bidders, in order to qualify for award of the Contract, the substantially responsive bidders should meet the minimum qualifying criteria. Therefore the substantially responsive bids are evaluated against the following minimum qualifying criteria and evaluation table showing ranking of the bids are as follows: [for evaluation under new point based system(April 2011) attach the evaluation table showing the ranking of the bids generated from e-tool here]. Evaluation: In accordance with the Instruction to Bidders ITB 29, the work can be awarded to (insert name of Bidder) who has scored the maximum price preference –financial score as shown in the above table. Signature of the Evaluation Committee: 1. 2. 3. Enclosures: Copy of bidding document (Annex I) Copy of bid invitation and press advertisement (Annex II) Copies of amendment issued (Annex III) Minutes of bid opening (Annex IV) Determination table of responsiveness (Annex V) Minutes of pre-bid meeting (Annex VI) Comparative statement of offers (Annex VII) PRR-3 Sample Preliminary examination (Determination of responsiveness) Sl No. Name of bidders Verification Eligibility Bid security of bid Substantial Acceptance for detailed examination 1 A Yes No1 Yes Yes No No 2 B Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 C Yes Yes Yes No4 No No 4 D No2 Yes No3 Yes No No 5 E Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 F Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Government owned enterprise and legally not autonomous. 2 Trade license not valid
Procurement-Rules-and-Regulation-2009-Revised-2015.docx