The Medium/Large C&I class as a whole will see a decrease of its share of allocated revenue of between 1.3 and 1.0 percent annually over three years, as compared to the system average change. Many schools do not receive information about their electric costs and thus have little incentive or information to effectively manage their energy usage because electric bills are received and paid in central business offices. The majority of the 40 individual school districts analyzed by SDG&E showed annual bill benefits from SDG&E’s TOU proposal. The school districts that are negatively impacted by the changing TOU on-peak period are schools that installed solar, who will receive less revenue crediting for their solar generation as a result of the modified TOU period. In recognition that customers, including schools, have made investments in solar facilities in reliance on expected revenue streams based on today’s TOU periods, we adopted grandfathering provisions in D.17-01-006. Both PG&E and SCE implemented specialized rates to promote commercial fleet electrification, but SDG&E has not. Exhibit JT-2 balances the opening positions of SDG&E and Farm Bureau, enables agricultural customers to adjust to changing electric rate structures, and is consistent with the joint testimony offered for residential and small commercial customers. No party opposed the agricultural customer optional rate. SDG&E utilitizes both a Consolidated Model (revenue allocation) and a Lighting Model (rate design) to develop streetlighting rates. No discrepancy exists in the authorized revenues and rates between the Revenue Allocation Settlement, the Consolidated Model, and the Lighting Model.
The Medium/Large C&I class as a whole will see a decrease of its share of allocated revenue of between 1.3 and 1.0 percent annually over three years, as compared to the system average change. Many schools do not receive information about their electric costs and thus have little incentive or information to effectively manage their energy usage because electric bills are received and paid in central business offices. The majority of the 40 individual school districts analyzed by SDG&E showed annual bill benefits from SDG&E’s TOU proposal. The school districts that are negatively impacted by the changing TOU on-peak period are schools that installed solar, who will receive less revenue crediting for their solar generation as a result of the modified TOU period. In recognition that customers, including schools, have made investments in solar facilities in reliance on expected revenue streams based on today’s TOU periods, we adopted grandfathering provisions in D.17-01-006. Both PG&E and SCE implemented specialized rates to promote commercial fleet electrification, but SDG&E has not. Exhibit JT-2 balances the opening positions of SDG&E and Farm Bureau, enables agricultural customers to adjust to changing electric rate structures, and is consistent with the joint testimony offered for residential and small commercial customers. No party opposed the agricultural customer optional rate. SDG&E utilitizes both a Consolidated Model (revenue allocation) and a Lighting Model (rate design) to develop streetlighting rates. No discrepancy exists in the authorized revenues and rates between the Revenue Allocation Settlement, the Consolidated Model, and the Lighting Model.
192079738.docx