& 24-month EP: 18-mth Plan + Baseline 2010 Progress against baseline to Output(s) Indicator Verification / Who Year 4.5 Target EP: date (for 24-mth EP) Source (June 2015) Year 2.5 Target (June 2013) Programme Goal: Strengthened governance and rule of law in Pacific Island Countries through enhanced access to justice and professional judicial officers who act independently according to legal principles. All PICs report a All PICs have court PICs have: no PICs continue (now in its fourth PICs provide year Perceptions of quality, PIC courts and TA continuing positive and judicial common set of year) to qualitatively and two and four court professionalism, court users’ trend in court performance indicators to assess quantitatively assess and performance data. accessibility, efficiency surveys. performance, feedback from court performance provided court performance and reliability of judicial Courts aware of transparently court users and or performance data. services. what court users' accounting for demonstrate a enhancement needs are. performance and positive trend in models to Tools have been disseminated Participating PICs Evidence of progress Statistical data routinely using internal court transpose, no to all PICs, and further revision have qualitatively against judicial collected by PIC performance data to performance data. regional governance of these is underway, to assist and quantitatively development and court courts. forward plan. mechanisms to the PICs in the process of assessed court performance goals in institutionalise assessing and reporting on performance and each PIC. Needs MSC judicial development court performance, as well as judicial development Assessment or manage internal developing codes of judicial and participated in survey / regional governance / ethics, conduct, including the self-improvement discussions at CJ/ an unquantified management of internal activities to NC meetings. number of governance/ethics. strengthen marginalised governance, access prospective court Judicial and court officers in all to justice, judicial users and a PICs have, and are continuing administration and significant number to receive training in a broad professionalism. of lay judicial range of legal and procedural officers. areas according to their individual needs, and the needs of their court. RTT members are continuously engaged in designing, facilitating and/or local and regional training activities.
& 24-month EP: Year 4.5 Target (June 2015) 18-mth Plan + EP: Year 2.5 Target (June 2013) Baseline 2010 Progress against baseline to date Output(s) (for 24-mth EP) Indicator Verification / Source Who Programme Goal: Strengthened governance and rule of law in Pacific Island Countries through enhanced access to justice and professional judicial officers who act independently according to legal principles. All PICs report a continuing positive trend in court performance, transparently accounting for performance and routinely using performance data to forward plan. All PICs have court and judicial performance feedback from court users and demonstrate a positive trend in internal court performance data. PICs have: no common set of indicators to assess court performance or performance enhancement models to transpose, no regional governance mechanisms to institutionalise judicial development or manage internal governance / ethics, an unquantified number of marginalised prospective court users and a significant number of lay judicial officers. PICs continue (now in its fourth year) to qualitatively and quantitatively assess and provided court performance data. Tools have been disseminated to all PICs, and further revision of these is underway, to assist the PICs in the process of assessing and reporting on court performance, as well as developing codes of judicial conduct, including the management of internal governance/ethics. Judicial and court officers in all PICs have, and are continuing to receive training in a broad range of legal and procedural areas according to their individual needs, and the needs of their court. RTT members are continuously engaged in designing, facilitating and/or local and regional training activities. PICs provide year two and four court performance data. Perceptions of quality, professionalism, accessibility, efficiency and reliability of judicial services. PIC courts and court users’ surveys. TA Courts aware of what court users' needs are. Participating PICs have qualitatively and quantitatively assessed court performance and judicial development and participated in self-improvement activities to strengthen governance, access to justice, judicial administration and professionalism. Evidence of progress against judicial development and court performance goals in each PIC. Statistical data collected by PIC courts. Needs Assessment survey / regional discussions at CJ/ NC meetings. MSC
Programme-Completion-Report-annexes.docx