Primary Critical Performance Requirements Determination Guidelines CPR Criteria Item Explanation Requirement is Heavily consider requirements that directly contribute to a directly tied to the business case as candidates for CPR status. During program’s NAS business investment analysis, the program office usually develops a case Business Case Analysis Report (BCAR) as well as a Shortfall Analysis Report (SAR) as part of their investment approval process. The BCAR and SAR may define metrics or measure that can form the basis for developing CPRs. Requirement is At least some of the CPRs are able to address a critical program’s directly tied to an operational issues, although there does not have to be a Investment COI relationship. A tie-in contributes to a given requirement’s potential to be a CPR. Requirement Requirements that are technically more difficult to achieve may poses a high level pose a higher level of risk to the program. In addition to posing of technical risk higher risk to the program, certain requirements may have greater risk associated to the NAS, as determined by following the FAA’s Safety Management System. As a result, the program may want to monitor these requirements with greater attention. Therefore, consider requirements with a higher risk rating as candidates for CPR status. Requirements Requirements allocated to investments from the enterprise can poses a high risk represent a risk to the plans of the enterprise. These requirements to enterprise often represent capabilities that are necessary for multiple strategy investments to deliver on their expected benefits. The disruption enterprise-level strategies is possible if an investment is not able to deliver on one of these requirements. Requirements that cannot be to other investments have a higher level of risk. ‘traded off’ Table 3 asks some general questions about the nature of the requirements that are candidate CPRs. These are not meant to be specific selection criteria. The list below clarifies the role of a specific requirement compared to the others within the program. This can help determine the relative importance of larger sets of requirements. Table 3. Second-Pass Critical Performance Requirements Determination Guidelines Secondary Critical Performance Requirements Determination Guidelines CPR Criteria Item Explanation Requirement Consider if a program consolidates, eliminates or duplicates any provides new of the existing legacy NAS capabilities. Consolidation and functionality elimination of legacy capabilities, in particular may have
Primary Critical Performance Requirements Determination Guidelines CPR Criteria Item Explanation Requirement is directly tied to the NAS business case Heavily consider requirements that directly contribute to a program’s business case as candidates for CPR status. During investment analysis, the program office usually develops a Business Case Analysis Report (BCAR) as well as a Shortfall Analysis Report (SAR) as part of their investment approval process. The BCAR and SAR may define metrics or measure that can form the basis for developing CPRs. Requirement is directly tied to an Investment COI At least some of the CPRs are able to address a program’s critical operational issues, although there does not have to be a relationship. A tie-in contributes to a given requirement’s potential to be a CPR. Requirement poses a high level of technical risk Requirements that are technically more difficult to achieve may pose a higher level of risk to the program. In addition to posing higher risk to the program, certain requirements may have greater risk associated to the NAS, as determined by following the FAA’s Safety Management System. As a result, the program may want to monitor these requirements with greater attention. Therefore, consider requirements with a higher risk rating as candidates for CPR status. Requirements poses a high risk to enterprise strategy Requirements allocated to investments from the enterprise can represent a risk to the plans of the enterprise. These requirements often represent capabilities that are necessary for multiple investments to deliver on their expected benefits. The disruption enterprise-level strategies is possible if an investment is not able to deliver on one of these requirements. Requirements that cannot be ‘traded off’ to other investments have a higher level of risk. Table 3 asks some general questions about the nature of the requirements that are candidate CPRs. These are not meant to be specific selection criteria. The list below clarifies the role of a specific requirement compared to the others within the program. This can help determine the relative importance of larger sets of requirements. Table 3. Second-Pass Critical Performance Requirements Determination Guidelines Secondary Critical Performance Requirements Determination Guidelines CPR Criteria Item Explanation Requirement provides new functionality Consider if a program consolidates, eliminates or duplicates any of the existing legacy NAS capabilities. Consolidation and elimination of legacy capabilities, in particular may have
programreq.docx