(APC CPD Standard 1.1) Evidence examples: explanation, promotional material, presentation materials etc. Please give details of authors, content Pharmacist or Subject Contribution to Activity developers and presenters and their Name involvement in the activity development. Matter Expert (SME) (APC CPD Standard 2.1) Pharmacist SME Pharmacist SME Pharmacist SME Pharmacist SME Pharmacist SME Declarations of conflicts of interests and activity Please attach a completed Conflict of Interest Declaration for sponsorship each author, content developer and presenter. Explanation of any activity sponsorship (if applicable) (APC CPD Standard 2.4, 3.2) How will conflicts of interests be made available to participants? (APC CPD Standard 3.2) Evidence examples: explanation, presentation, handouts, website etc. Is the activity free of commercial bias and Yes No promotional language? (APC CPD Standard 2.5) Do limitations on information or referencing Yes No exist? If yes, please give details: Content should be based on critical evaluation of relevant literature and/or practice-based Evidence examples: professional evidence (and referenced accordingly). Activity content in which ideally references are < 5 years old. Explanation of lack of evidence available or lack of change in (APC CPD Standard 2.3) evidence available and how this will be addressed must be explained. What has been done to ensure the content relates to contemporary pharmacy practice? (APC CPD Standard 2.1) Methods of delivery must promote effective adult learning (APC CPD Standard 4.1, 4.2)
(APC CPD Standard 1.1) Evidence examples: explanation, promotional material, presentation materials etc. Please give details of authors, content developers and presenters and their involvement in the activity development. (APC CPD Standard 2.1) Pharmacist or Subject Matter Expert (SME) Name Contribution to Activity Pharmacist SME Pharmacist SME Pharmacist SME Pharmacist SME Pharmacist SME Declarations of conflicts of interests and activity sponsorship (APC CPD Standard 2.4, 3.2) Please attach a completed Conflict of Interest Declaration for each author, content developer and presenter. Explanation of any activity sponsorship (if applicable) How will conflicts of interests be made available to participants? (APC CPD Standard 3.2) Evidence examples: explanation, presentation, handouts, website etc. Is the activity free of commercial bias and promotional language? (APC CPD Standard 2.5) Yes No Do limitations on information or referencing exist? Content should be based on critical evaluation of relevant literature and/or practice-based professional evidence (and referenced accordingly). (APC CPD Standard 2.3) Yes No If yes, please give details: Evidence examples: Activity content in which ideally references are < 5 years old. Explanation of lack of evidence available or lack of change in evidence available and how this will be addressed must be explained. What has been done to ensure the content relates to contemporary pharmacy practice? (APC CPD Standard 2.1) Methods of delivery must promote effective adult learning (APC CPD Standard 4.1, 4.2)
Q.CPD.F8.V6-Accreditation-Application-Form.docx