days of the notification receipt the Tenderer shall advise his acceptance of the corrections made by the Procurement commission. If within the specified term the Tenderer does not advise his acceptance of the corrections made by the Procurement commission, the Procurement commission shall consider that the Tenderer accepts the corrections. 11.4. stage 4 Evaluation of the tenders – The Procurement commission shall evaluate the tenders conforming to the Regulations requirements and shall select the economically most advantageous tender according to the following evaluation criteria: Maximum No. Criterion number of Evaluation method points * 1. Offered price (C) 10 Lowest determined according to the following formula: where: Cmin = Lowest of all the offers. CP = Price offered by the Tenderer. 2. Quality (Q) 90 Quality determined according to the following formula:: = Q Qp = Total number of points of the Tenderer’s offer according to the quality evaluation sub-criterion. Qmax = The largest number of points all offers according to the quality evaluation sub-criterion. 2.1. Description of the 90 Points are assigned, if the sub-criteria are service including met: description of works, processes 10 points and progress of the The program of visit submitted by the processes included Tenderer conforms to the desired objective in the tender and expected results of study visit. 15 points The tender contains the description of learning methods used in the program of study visit, the selected methods are justified and are employed in order to accomplish the objective. 10 points The program of study visit submitted by the Tenderer is balanced and is fit for the target group. 10 points
days of the notification receipt the Tenderer shall advise his acceptance of the corrections made by the Procurement commission. If within the specified term the Tenderer does not advise his acceptance of the corrections made by the Procurement commission, the Procurement commission shall consider that the Tenderer accepts the corrections. 11.4. stage 4 – Evaluation of the tenders The Procurement commission shall evaluate the tenders conforming to the Regulations requirements and shall select the economically most advantageous tender according to the following evaluation criteria: No. Criterion Maximum number of points * Evaluation method 1. Offered price (C) 10 Lowest determined according to the following formula: where: Cmin = Lowest of all the offers. CP = Price offered by the Tenderer. 2. Quality (Q) 90 Quality determined according to the following formula:: Q = Qp = Total number of points of the Tenderer’s offer according to the quality evaluation sub-criterion. Qmax = The largest number of points all offers according to the quality evaluation sub-criterion. 2.1. Description of the service including description of works, processes and progress of the processes included in the tender 90 Points are assigned, if the sub-criteria are met: 10 points The program of visit submitted by the Tenderer conforms to the desired objective and expected results of study visit. 15 points The tender contains the description of learning methods used in the program of study visit, the selected methods are justified and are employed in order to accomplish the objective. 10 points The program of study visit submitted by the Tenderer is balanced and is fit for the target group. 10 points
regulations_of_the_procruement_procedure_24_08_0.docx