Review of expenditure Previous Academic Year 2016/17 Quality of teaching for all Desired outcome Chosen action Estimated impact: Did you meet the Lessons learned Cost / approach success criteria? Include impact on pupils (and whether you will continue with this not eligible for PP, if appropriate. approach) Higher rates of progress EAL procedures put EAL training given during three PDMS focussing on Questionnaire evaluation sheet indicated the training was £900 for EAL PP children into place to ensure good practice for all EAL pupils PP & non-PP X 3 extremely beneficial and would like more of the longer across the academy. that progress rates sessions, 45 minutes each and a 3 hour session session. Upon observation staff showed improved are accelerated from SALT. understanding and taught skills, confidence levels. Further across the academy. training will follow during the 2017-18 academic year; we will use an outside agency to deliver high quality CPD. The SENco ran the EAL PP and non-pp groups All of the EAL- PP and non-PP interventions indicated The gap between £21200 across the year, daily interventions took place with expected if not accelerated progress in all core subjects. EAL/ non PP EAL 2-3 interventions taking place in a single afternoon; These were solely run by the SENCO. For this level of children closes and resulting in the average progress of: matches the progress success to be sustained EAL-PP interventions need to be or exceeds the run by more staff other than the SENCO. Reading: 4 steps of progress which indicated progress of non EAL accelerated progress. children. Writing: 2.5 steps of progress which indicates expected progress Maths: 2.75 steps of progress which indicates expected progress Non-PP EAL Reading: 3.25 steps of progress Writing: 3.3 steps of progress Maths: 2.5 steps of progress This indicates in two out of the three core subjects PP-EAL out-performed non PP-EAL
Review of expenditure Previous Academic Year 2016/17 Quality of teaching for all Desired outcome Chosen action / approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost Higher rates of progress for EAL PP children across the academy. EAL procedures put into place to ensure that progress rates are accelerated across the academy. The gap between EAL/ non PP EAL children closes and matches the progress or exceeds the progress of non EAL children. EAL training given during three PDMS focussing on good practice for all EAL pupils PP & non-PP X 3 sessions, 45 minutes each and a 3 hour session from SALT. The SENco ran the EAL PP and non-pp groups across the year, daily interventions took place with 2-3 interventions taking place in a single afternoon; resulting in the average progress of: Reading: 4 steps of progress which indicated accelerated progress. Writing: 2.5 steps of progress which indicates expected progress Maths: 2.75 steps of progress which indicates expected progress Non-PP EAL Reading: 3.25 steps of progress Writing: 3.3 steps of progress Maths: 2.5 steps of progress This indicates in two out of the three core subjects PP-EAL out-performed non PP-EAL Questionnaire evaluation sheet indicated the training was extremely beneficial and would like more of the longer session. Upon observation staff showed improved understanding and taught skills, confidence levels. Further training will follow during the 2017-18 academic year; we will use an outside agency to deliver high quality CPD. All of the EAL- PP and non-PP interventions indicated expected if not accelerated progress in all core subjects. These were solely run by the SENCO. For this level of success to be sustained EAL-PP interventions need to be run by more staff other than the SENCO. £900 £21200
Pupil-Premuim-2017-18.docx