Influencing development such that it has environmental impact on marine and terrestrial priority systems. We should engage in Infrastructure, Oil and Gas, Extractives and Agriculture. Natural resource Management is done or sustainably managed through appropriate governance. We also want to ensure more broad coordination of CSO engagement across the programme, i.e. marine, terrestrial, energy and trade and investment. What should we stop doing Working with CSOs directly but rather work through forums/coalitions in the respective CEA countries. What should we do differently? The NR Governance Barometer to be transitioned to country offices and then CSOs over 3 years, so that the countries have local ownership. Adopt spatial planning (though government planning processes) for better NRM and reduction of adverse impacts Transition investment guidelines (voluntary) into investment requirements (mandatory). Use economy opportunity/umbrella to drive priority policy work regarding development and natural resource management Innovative financing for Natural Resource Management to include private sector financing and PES. Consider implementation of Governance related work in Rovuma Landscape as demonstration of translation of high-level policy to the ground. Implications for our Approaches Work with partners/through thematic platforms Make adjustment/review programs intervention logic/documents Work differently with some partners and Identify new partners Work with non-traditional sectors e.g. finance, planning Agriculture, Infrastructure etc. Strategies Need to review skill sets of staff and fill gaps and /or also work strategically with/through existing or new partners. This need to be strategic because WWF does not need to have all the skills for all the identified work, but can find appropriate partners. Review of Strategic Objectives and Milestones The team agreed that there might be a need to review the governance objectives to reflect on the above proposed approaches and strategies. of Theories of Change Terrestrial Component: Discussions on the Theories of Change were:
Influencing development such that it has environmental impact on marine and terrestrial priority systems. We should engage in Infrastructure, Oil and Gas, Extractives and Agriculture. Natural resource Management is done or sustainably managed through appropriate governance. We also want to ensure more broad coordination of CSO engagement across the programme, i.e. marine, terrestrial, energy and trade and investment. What should we stop doing Working with CSOs directly but rather work through forums/coalitions in the respective CEA countries. What should we do differently? The NR Governance Barometer to be transitioned to country offices and then CSOs over 3 years, so that the countries have local ownership. Adopt spatial planning (though government planning processes) for better NRM and reduction of adverse impacts Transition investment guidelines (voluntary) into investment requirements (mandatory). Use economy opportunity/umbrella to drive priority policy work regarding development and natural resource management Innovative financing for Natural Resource Management to include private sector financing and PES. Consider implementation of Governance related work in Rovuma Landscape as demonstration of translation of high-level policy to the ground. Implications for our Approaches Work with partners/through thematic platforms Make adjustment/review programs intervention logic/documents Work differently with some partners and Identify new partners Work with non-traditional sectors e.g. finance, planning Agriculture, Infrastructure etc. Strategies Need to review skill sets of staff and fill gaps and /or also work strategically with/through existing or new partners. This need to be strategic because WWF does not need to have all the skills for all the identified work, but can find appropriate partners. Review of Strategic Objectives and Milestones The team agreed that there might be a need to review the governance objectives to reflect on the above proposed approaches and strategies. of Theories of Change Terrestrial Component: Discussions on the Theories of Change were:
report_shg_physical_meeting___2013_maputo_final.docx