Your proposal Is poignant, thoughtful Your design for the future is An acceptable production, A flippant response, your A poor representation, your and considerate of the complex solid. It is thoughtful and You futuristic model covers future design is project is weak and shows a Proposed situation that involves a number of comprehensive but misses the basics, but neglects to dysfunctional and / or lack of understanding of the Design religions, cultural groups and societies. out on some fine details. consider the complexity of unclear. It needs revision complex groups that occupy Your solution is creative and has taken the region. and greater consideration of the Middle East. This portion (Small Group) into consideration the past and the the facts available. of the project needs to be present milieu in its derivation. reconsidered. You have represented your group with You have represented your You have represented your You have represented your You have represented your Advocacy passion and you have articulated your group with well and you have group with reasonably well group and you have group haphazardly and you stance with thorough knowledge. articulated your stance with and you have articulated articulated your stance with have articulated your stance (Small Group) good knowledge. your stance with some some knowledge. with weak knowledge. knowledge. The final presentation is extremely well The final presentation is well The final presentation The presentation is The project is consistently Final laid out and clearly showcases the laid out and neatly displays sufficiently displays the somewhat scattered and difficult to follow. Agreement information. the information. information so that the makes the project difficult to reader is able to discern the follow at times. (Full Class) focus of the information.
Proposed Design (Small Group) Your proposal Is poignant, thoughtful and considerate of the complex situation that involves a number of religions, cultural groups and societies. Your solution is creative and has taken into consideration the past and the present milieu in its derivation. Your design for the future is solid. It is thoughtful and comprehensive but misses out on some fine details. An acceptable production, You futuristic model covers the basics, but neglects to consider the complexity of the region. A flippant response, your future design is dysfunctional and / or unclear. It needs revision and greater consideration of the facts available. A poor representation, your project is weak and shows a lack of understanding of the complex groups that occupy the Middle East. This portion of the project needs to be reconsidered. Advocacy (Small Group) You have represented your group with passion and you have articulated your stance with thorough knowledge. You have represented your group with well and you have articulated your stance with good knowledge. You have represented your group with reasonably well and you have articulated your stance with some knowledge. You have represented your group and you have articulated your stance with some knowledge. You have represented your group haphazardly and you have articulated your stance with weak knowledge. Final Agreement (Full Class) The final presentation is extremely well laid out and clearly showcases the information. The final presentation is well laid out and neatly displays the information. The final presentation sufficiently displays the information so that the reader is able to discern the focus of the information. The presentation is somewhat scattered and makes the project difficult to follow at times. The project is consistently difficult to follow.
re-mapping_the_middle_east.docx