Table 8. Comparison of threats from previous internal Parks Victoria assessments (Parks Victoria 2003b, 2003c, 2004) with those from Risk Register hazards. (Note that partial matches of threats are recognised in this comparison.) Workshop: (Park) Previous Assessment Workshop Assessment no. of No. of No. of Threats Threats Threats threats threats hazards from Risk from Risk from Risk considered rated High in Risk Register Register Register or Extreme Register rated rated High not or Extreme Low, considered in Previous Moderate in Previous or not Assess. Assess. (i.e. scored in “new” Previous threats) Assess. Discovery Bay 59 7 10 4 1 5 Shipwreck Coast 59 8 17 2 6 9 a Marengo Reefs 59 8 16 1 9 5 Surf Coast 59 8 12 2 7 3 a Barwon Bluff 16 14 18 5 0 13 b Port Phillip 7 25 20 12 4 0 c a b Cooke 23 13 15 4 2 9 b Jawbone 23 13 13 5 0 8 b Ricketts 22 15 14 6 0 8 b Mushroom Reef 22 10 16 6 3 7 b Western Port (1): b Churchill Island MNP 20 9 10 5 0 5 Western Port (2): b Yaringa MNP 12 2 16 2 1 13 French Island MNP 12 5 16 2 2 12 Bunurong 51 27 11 5 0 6 Promontory: d Wilsons Prom. MNP 50 32 7 2 0 5 Corner Inlet MNP 52 18 10 7 3 Ninety Mile 51 25 11 8 2 1 East Gippsland: e Beware Reef MS 54 42 8 5 0 3 Hicks MNP 50 21 8 4 0 4 Cape Howe MNP 50 23 8 4 0 4 a Comparison made on a combined Compliance Plan threat list for all parks or park components b For these parks, high risk in the relevant Compliance Plan was effectively =10 on a 25-point scale of risk. c An identical threat occurred in two separate hazards (i.e. hazards differed only in values affected). d Parks were compared individually because the majority of hazards at this workshop were park specific. e Parks were compared individually because parks at this workshop were scored individually.
Table 8. Comparison of threats from previous internal Parks Victoria assessments (Parks Victoria 2003b, 2003c, 2004) with those from Risk Register hazards. (Note that partial matches of threats are recognised in this comparison.) Workshop: (Park) Previous Assessment Workshop Assessment no. of threats considered No. of threats rated High or Extreme No. of hazards in Risk Register Threats from Risk Register rated High or Extreme in Previous Assess. Threats from Risk Register rated Low, Moderate or not scored in Previous Assess. Threats from Risk Register not considered in Previous Assess. (i.e. “new” threats) Discovery Bay 59 7 10 4 1 5 Shipwreck Coast a 59 8 17 2 6 9 Marengo Reefs 59 8 16 1 9 5 Surf Coast a 59 8 12 2 7 3 Barwon Bluff b 16 14 18 5 0 13 Port Phillip a b 25 20 12 4 0 7 c Cooke b 23 13 15 4 2 9 Jawbone b 23 13 13 5 0 8 Ricketts b 22 15 14 6 0 8 Mushroom Reef b 22 10 16 6 3 7 Western Port (1): b Churchill Island MNP 20 9 10 5 0 5 Western Port (2): b 12 2 16 2 1 13 Yaringa MNP French Island MNP 12 5 16 2 2 12 Bunurong 51 27 11 5 0 6 Promontory: d 50 32 7 2 0 5 Wilsons Prom. MNP Corner Inlet MNP 52 18 10 7 3 Ninety Mile 51 25 11 8 2 1 East Gippsland: e 54 42 8 5 0 3 Beware Reef MS Hicks MNP 50 21 8 4 0 4 Cape Howe MNP 50 23 8 4 0 4 a Comparison made on a combined Compliance Plan threat list for all parks or park components b For these parks, high risk in the relevant Compliance Plan was effectively =10 on a 25-point scale of risk. c An identical threat occurred in two separate hazards (i.e. hazards differed only in values affected). d Parks were compared individually because the majority of hazards at this workshop were park specific. e Parks were compared individually because parks at this workshop were scored individually.
19_2067.docx