Section C: Reporting on educational partnerships (if relevant) If any programme(s) reviewed is delivered through an educational partnership (including articulation arrangements), please state the date that the site visit took place and the date the Board of Studies considered the report. Details of relevant programmes can be found in the University’s . Please state the name of the staff member visiting and the date of the visit. If this does not apply to your programme(s), simply type 'Not applicable'. Please state the date when the visit Please give the date of the meeting report was considered by the Board and the relevant minute number. of Studies: Please comment on the operation of this partnership during the year under review. If this does not apply to your programme(s), simply type 'Not applicable'. If your programme is delivered through an educational partnership (including articulation arrangements), please consider and comment on the following key issues: How the relationship with the partner has gone – highlight any particular areas which have gone well and could be shared with other similar provision or any areas where difficulties have been encountered How has the programme been marketed; have there been any issues in relation to this? How do students on an educational partnerships programme or entering through an EP arrangement, such as RPL or articulation arrangement perform academically in comparison to other groups of students? How has the Newcastle student experience been delivered? Highlight any areas where this has been difficult to address? If this is the first year of operating the educational partnership you must comment on the following: Admissions and induction processes for students. Were the target numbers achieved? How assessment procedures have worked How effective the arragements in each area have been during the first year of the partnership Is the partnership working in line with the legal agreement If the programme is to be professionally accredited what progress has been made. Your comments should focus on the key elements relating to these issues; there is no need to provide a detailed narrative in relation to them. Typically responses to this question might be two to three paragraphs in length; normally the full response would not exceed one side at most. You may draw upon the staff site visit report forms. Section D: Reporting on the operation of key quality management processes
Section C: Reporting on educational partnerships (if relevant) If any programme(s) reviewed is delivered through an educational partnership (including articulation arrangements), please state the date that the site visit took place and the date the Board of Studies considered the report. Details of relevant programmes can be found in the University’s . Please state the name of the staff member visiting and the date of the visit. If this does not apply to your programme(s), simply type 'Not applicable'. Please state the date when the visit report was considered by the Board of Studies: Please give the date of the meeting and the relevant minute number. Please comment on the operation of this partnership during the year under review. If this does not apply to your programme(s), simply type 'Not applicable'. If your programme is delivered through an educational partnership (including articulation arrangements), please consider and comment on the following key issues: How the relationship with the partner has gone – highlight any particular areas which have gone well and could be shared with other similar provision or any areas where difficulties have been encountered How has the programme been marketed; have there been any issues in relation to this? How do students on an educational partnerships programme or entering through an EP arrangement, such as RPL or articulation arrangement perform academically in comparison to other groups of students? How has the Newcastle student experience been delivered? Highlight any areas where this has been difficult to address? If this is the first year of operating the educational partnership you must comment on the following: Admissions and induction processes for students. Were the target numbers achieved? How assessment procedures have worked How effective the arragements in each area have been during the first year of the partnership Is the partnership working in line with the legal agreement If the programme is to be professionally accredited what progress has been made. Your comments should focus on the key elements relating to these issues; there is no need to provide a detailed narrative in relation to them. Typically responses to this question might be two to three paragraphs in length; normally the full response would not exceed one side at most. You may draw upon the staff site visit report forms. Section D: Reporting on the operation of key quality management processes
qsh-amr-pgtform.docx