Increase in attainment of Children were The PP children supported by the Intervention TAs It was apparent that children made more gains when pupil premium children, supported in small made good progress. supported by a skilled member of staff rather than a especially those with groups for literacy by TAs, in collaboration with the class teacher and commercially available tutoring programming. Staff SEN. an experienced SENDCo were able to adapt some available working in school are more able to react to children’s teacher. programmes, eg, Beat Dyslexia to directly target needs and target interventions based on the needs and help support class room learning. assessment data and observations provided by the children‘s A team of Intervention teacher. Assistants target At the end of the summer term, all PP children with gaps in the learning SEN were accessing age appropriate assessment We have chosen not to implement the Third Space of PP children and un criteria Learning programme this year. tailored interventions. The Third Space Learning Intervention was not Third Space learning effective. None of the Year 6 children who took part in online maths tutoring the programme reached the expected level in maths. sessions. Other approaches Desired outcome Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the Lessons learned Cost action/approach success criteria? Include impact on pupils not (and whether you will continue with this eligible for PP, if appropriate. approach) £5,487
Increase in attainment of pupil premium children, especially those with SEN. Children were supported in small groups for literacy by an experienced teacher. A team of Intervention Assistants target gaps in the learning of PP children and un tailored interventions. Third Space learning online maths tutoring sessions. The PP children supported by the Intervention TAs made good progress. TAs, in collaboration with the class teacher and SENDCo were able to adapt some available programmes, eg, Beat Dyslexia to directly target children‘s needs and help support class room learning. At the end of the summer term, all PP children with SEN were accessing age appropriate assessment criteria The Third Space Learning Intervention was not effective. None of the Year 6 children who took part in the programme reached the expected level in maths. It was apparent that children made more gains when supported by a skilled member of staff rather than a commercially available tutoring programming. Staff working in school are more able to react to children’s needs and target interventions based on the assessment data and observations provided by the teacher. We have chosen not to implement the Third Space Learning programme this year. Other approaches Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost £5,487
PP-2017-report.docx