1.2 Integration of 1.2.1 Extent to which Explicit stage in policy and 5 Explicit decision step, For example: any – disaster resilience with proposal in government is also budget approval process where applied to all policy and budget initiatives evaluated for disaster resilience disaster resilience side benefits, proposals in all relevant Traffic management systems may also benefits or impairments. or impairments, of any city functional areas. help with evacuation, so increasing government initiative are disaster resilience; identified and counted towards 4 Explicit or semi-explicit – the Return on Investment (ROI) decision step, applied in most A development approval may locate for that proposal. and in most functional people in harm’s way; areas. A land use change may reduce benefit of 3 formal process, but wetlands in preventing floods. –No . disaster resilience benefits are generally understood to be Includes, but not restricted to, the functional to a proposal, in most areas of: land use and zoning; development; “helpful” functional areas. water, energy; public safety; transportation; food supply; healthcare. 2 Decision step sometimes – applied, but very likely to be overlooked in most functional areas if a proposal would impair disaster resilience. 1 Applied ad hoc or – occasionally. 0 Not applied. – 1.3 Capture, 1.3.1 Extent to data on the Availability of a single 5 Full availability of the Information to consider making open for “version – publication and city’s resilience position is of the truth” a single integrated information listed at on public access might include: – sharing of data shared with other organizations set of resilience data for readiness and risk; fully shared involved with the city’s practitioners. with other organizations.. A summary of readiness perhaps the – resilience. LG SAT. 4 Some minor gaps, or the – information is in more than one The outcomes of this scorecard; place but it is shared and it is – at least linked to enable An explanation of the hazards and perils navigation. that the city is thought to face, and probabilities;
1.2 Integration of disaster resilience with initiatives 1.2.1 Extent to which any proposal in government is also evaluated for disaster resilience benefits or impairments. Explicit stage in policy and budget approval process where disaster resilience side benefits, or impairments, of any city government initiative are identified and counted towards the Return on Investment (ROI) for that proposal. . 5 – Explicit decision step, applied to all policy and budget proposals in all relevant functional areas. 4 – Explicit or semi-explicit decision step, applied in most and in most functional areas. 3 –No formal process, but disaster resilience benefits are generally understood to be “helpful” to a proposal, in most functional areas. 2 – Decision step sometimes applied, but very likely to be overlooked in most functional areas if a proposal would impair disaster resilience. 1 – Applied ad hoc or occasionally. 0 – Not applied. For example: Traffic management systems may also help with evacuation, so increasing disaster resilience; A development approval may locate people in harm’s way; A land use change may reduce benefit of wetlands in preventing floods. Includes, but not restricted to, the functional areas of: land use and zoning; development; water, energy; public safety; transportation; food supply; healthcare. 1.3 Capture, publication and sharing of data 1.3.1 Extent to data on the city’s resilience position is shared with other organizations involved with the city’s resilience. Availability of a single “version of the truth” – a single integrated set of resilience data for practitioners. 5 – Full availability of the information listed at on readiness and risk; fully shared with other organizations.. 4 – Some minor gaps, or the information is in more than one place – but it is shared and it is at least linked to enable navigation. Information to consider making open for public access might include: A summary of readiness – perhaps the LG SAT. The outcomes of this scorecard; An explanation of the hazards and perils that the city is thought to face, and probabilities;
Resilience%20Scorecard%20Updated%20V2%20-%20April%2030th%202015.docx