Positives Negatives Gardner, and humanistic Very both argue that doing scientific as analyses of people's it uses objective, individual's unique set of quantifiable Reductionist - all our numerous unique talents are reduced to a measurements intelligence'. Leads to labelling (e.g. test scores The theory reifies intelligence and correlation a definition and discussion of Supported by The tests used to measure IQ vulnerable to ethnocentric large amounts RELATIVISM of scientific data Objective and unbiased Less time consuming- well in one subtest Gardner also stressed that intelligence is defined within the context of culture, so what is intelligent for one culture may not be so for another. Motivation Reliability Brophy (1981)- measurable Maslow (1970) McClelland (1953)- can change Validity Brophy (1981)- measurable, criterion validity, internal validity low because of complex factors
Positives Very scientific as it uses objective, quantifiable measurements (e.g. test scores and correlation Supported by large amounts of scientific data Objective and unbiased Less time consuming- well in one subtest Negatives Gardner, and humanistic both argue that doing analyses of people's individual's unique set of Reductionist - all our numerous unique talents are reduced to a intelligence'. Leads to labelling The theory reifies intelligence a definition and discussion of The tests used to measure IQ vulnerable to ethnocentric RELATIVISM Gardner also stressed that intelligence is defined within the context of culture, so what is intelligent for one culture may not be so for another. Motivation Reliability Brophy (1981)- measurable Maslow (1970) McClelland (1953)- can change Validity Brophy (1981)- measurable, criterion validity, internal validity low because of complex factors
psychology-notes.docx