The process reference model in an information maturity environment The current IM maturity development resource has been developed as a process driven Examples of the generic information management statements from 1 to level 5 are provided in table 1 below. Changes in organisational information maturity are reflected in increasingly more complex and sophisticated attribute requirements as the organisation moves from level 1 to level 5. Level 1 Ad 2 3 - Defined Level 4 - Managed Level 5 - – – hoc Repeatable Optimised Process Process Process Process performance Process performance performance - performance - Largely achieved performance – – Partially achieved Largely achieved Fully achieved achieved Work product Work product Work product Work product development - development management – – development Fully – Partially achieved Largely achieved achieved achieved Work product Performance Work product management management – – management – Partially achieved Fully achieved achieved Work product Work product Work product deployed - deployed - Fully deployed Largely – Partially achieved achieved Process Performance measurement – management – Fully Achieved Partially achieved Process Process optimisation measurement - occurring Partially achieved Table : Generic process driven statements across information management maturity levels Table 2 (page 11) translates generic statements outlined in table 1 above into a number of activities that would be likely to be undertaken in an organisation within the sub-domain of governance at an information management maturity of level 3 defined. The sample – statements are not intended to encompass all IM management activities that may be undertaken by an organisation in that domain.
The process reference model in an information maturity environment The current IM maturity development resource has been developed as a process driven Examples of the generic information management statements from 1 to level 5 are provided in table 1 below. Changes in organisational information maturity are reflected in increasingly more complex and sophisticated attribute requirements as the organisation moves from level 1 to level 5. Level 1 – Ad hoc 2 – Repeatable 3 - Defined Level 4 - Managed Level 5 - Optimised Process performance achieved Process performance - Partially achieved Work product development - Partially achieved Process performance - Largely achieved Work product development – Largely achieved Work product management – Partially achieved Work product deployed - Partially Process performance – Largely achieved Work product development – Fully achieved Work product management – achieved Work product deployed – Largely achieved Performance management – Partially achieved Process measurement - Partially achieved Process performance – Fully achieved Work product management – achieved Performance management – Fully achieved Work product deployed - Fully achieved Process measurement – Fully Achieved Process optimisation occurring Table : Generic process driven statements across information management maturity levels Table 2 (page 11) translates generic statements outlined in table 1 above into a number of activities that would be likely to be undertaken in an organisation within the sub-domain of governance at an information management maturity of level 3 – defined. The sample statements are not intended to encompass all IM management activities that may be undertaken by an organisation in that domain.
IM-Maturity-Development-Resource-Guideline.docx