ACE Internship Presentation Rubric Topic Needs Developing = 2 Satisfactory = 3 Excellent = 4 Improvement = 1 Creativity and Not creative at all Had some parts Had a good mix of Was extremely Style or clearly copied, that were creativity and was creative and the style was creative, but not entertaining; also original, definitely bland, boring, and nearly the had engaging parts did a fantastic job. was rushed. majority. Had a that were better few parts that than others. were either rushed or sloppy. Audience, Didn’t consider Some parts of the The presenter The presentation the audience and presentation addressed the was interactive, communication, the language was weren’t catered audience, the presenter and Eye Contact inappropriate. to the audience of displayed some engaged the Read off of the the panel and non-verbal audience, and paper the whole mostly read from communication, only referred to time and seemed the paper, and keep decent the paper once or nervous. displayed one or eye contact with twice. two attempts at the panel. non-verbal communication. Length, Quality, Was too short, The length is Good length, The length was and Overall had mistakes, and questionable, the interesting perfect, the Performance the presenter presentation slides/presentation presentation was didn’t adequately should have been method, and was creative, prepare. revised and well prepared with engaging, and edited, and the documentation without error, and presenter could and delivery. the presenter was have prepared outstanding. more. May have been too long.
ACE Internship Presentation Rubric Topic Needs Improvement = 1 Developing = 2 Satisfactory = 3 Excellent = 4 Creativity and Style Not creative at all or clearly copied, the style was bland, boring, and was rushed. Had some parts that were creative, but not nearly the majority. Had a few parts that were either rushed or sloppy. Had a good mix of creativity and was entertaining; also had engaging parts that were better than others. Was extremely creative and original, definitely did a fantastic job. Audience, communication, and Eye Contact Didn’t consider the audience and the language was inappropriate. Read off of the paper the whole time and seemed nervous. Some parts of the presentation weren’t catered to the audience of the panel and mostly read from the paper, displayed one or two attempts at non-verbal communication. The presenter addressed the audience, displayed some non-verbal communication, and keep decent eye contact with the panel. The presentation was interactive, the presenter engaged the audience, and only referred to the paper once or twice. Length, Quality, and Overall Performance Was too short, had mistakes, and the presenter didn’t adequately prepare. The length is questionable, the presentation should have been revised and edited, and the presenter could have prepared more. May have been too long. Good length, interesting slides/presentation method, and was well prepared with documentation and delivery. The length was perfect, the presentation was creative, engaging, and without error, and the presenter was outstanding.
internship_presentation_rubric.docx