for prevention effectiveness & treatment of of cooking Type 2 sessions diabetes Target group: High risk groups and general population 15. Fletcher A Systematic Dietary No and Rake C, review behaviour, 1998 knowledge, Only 1 attitudes & included Nutrition beliefs, study education, physiological included counselling measures cooking and policies and this Target group: 65+ was of unreliable methodology 16. Howerton Fruit and These data imply that Data from 7 studies 0 Yes MW et al, 2007 analysis vegetable school-based were included.. 8156 consumption interventions, can children were matched School-based (Net FV increase fruit and from pretest to nutrition difference and vegetable consumption posttest. Participants net FV relative by modest amounts were primarily initiatives change (%).) and thereby increase elementary school-aged Target group: nutrient density of the (75.5%) and white School children diet. These studies (66%), and 50.4%
for prevention & treatment of Type 2 diabetes Target group: High risk groups and general population effectiveness of cooking sessions 15. Fletcher A and Rake C, 1998 Nutrition education, counselling and policies Target group: 65+ Systematic review Dietary behaviour, knowledge, attitudes & beliefs, physiological measures No Only 1 included study included cooking and this was of unreliable methodology 16. Howerton MW et al, 2007 School-based nutrition initiatives Target group: School children Fruit and vegetable consumption (Net FV difference and net FV relative change (%).) These data imply that school-based interventions, can increase fruit and vegetable consumption by modest amounts and thereby increase nutrient density of the diet. These studies Data from 7 studies were included.. 8156 children were matched from pretest to posttest. Participants were primarily elementary school-aged (75.5%) and white (66%), and 50.4% 0 Yes analysis
Initiative%20assessment%20report%20Cooking%20Bus%20Final.docx