guidance: presentations, which should be clearly annotated to identify the practical The Environmental Permitting ( and ) competence elements of the presentation; Regulations ()/The Radioactive advice to an employer; Substances Act 1993 Amendment applications or variations to permits, ()Regulations ()* registrations or authorisations; Exemption orders made under contributions to, or co-authorship of, EPR/RSA* policies or guidance or publications in Published policies and guidance from newsletters or peer reviewed journals; examples of correspondence with the environment agencies* regulators on relevant aspects; Limitations and conditions included in production of guidance, instructions, environment agencies’ permits* COPs on compliance for If you decide to submit evidence that is additional to or in place of any of the above examples, list that evidence below: More detailed content (sub-topics) Guidance for the Applicant Evidence Assessor EA reference Decision No. 11b. Operational Radiation Radiological impact assessment methods* See Section 7 of the main text for detailed guidance on the extent of your evidence. Pathways by which radioactive discharges Protection- Hazard and risk Normally evidence should be provided for at may lead to a public dose: assessment (including least 5 of the 9 asterisked (*) items in the External* environmental impact). detailed content’ column. Suitable ‘More Airborne direct ingestion* – evidence may include: Airborne deposition, followed by – presentations, which should be clearly ingestion via food pathway* annotated to identify the practical competence elements of the presentation; Airborne inhalation* –
guidance: The Environmental Permitting ( and ) Regulations ()/The Radioactive Substances Act 1993 Amendment ()Regulations ()* Exemption orders made under EPR/RSA* Published policies and guidance from the environment agencies* Limitations and conditions included in environment agencies’ permits* presentations, which should be clearly annotated to identify the practical competence elements of the presentation; advice to an employer; applications or variations to permits, registrations or authorisations; contributions to, or co-authorship of, policies or guidance or publications in newsletters or peer reviewed journals; examples of correspondence with regulators on relevant aspects; production of guidance, instructions, COPs on compliance for If you decide to submit evidence that is additional to or in place of any of the above examples, list that evidence below: EA No. More detailed content (sub-topics) Guidance for the Applicant Evidence reference Assessor Decision 11b. Operational Radiation Protection- Hazard and risk assessment (including environmental impact). Radiological impact assessment methods* Pathways by which radioactive discharges may lead to a public dose: External* Airborne – direct ingestion* Airborne – deposition, followed by ingestion via food pathway* Airborne – inhalation* See Section 7 of the main text for detailed guidance on the extent of your evidence. Normally evidence should be provided for at least 5 of the 9 asterisked (*) items in the ‘More detailed content’ column. Suitable evidence may include: presentations, which should be clearly annotated to identify the practical competence elements of the presentation;
Instructions-for-the-creation-of-the-Portfolio-of-Evidence-for-RWA-certification.docx