strengthen comprehensive, evidence-based programs and services for all profiles of ELs that enable access to college- and career-ready learning, as well as opportunities to attain the State Seal of Biliteracy. Continuous Improvement California will monitor the implementation of these supports and will develop additional tools, toolkits, and guidance documents to support ELs, their teachers, parents, school administrators, and other school personnel, from pre-kindergarten through grade 12, as necessary based on LEA and stakeholder feedback. As part of the state’s emerging statewide system of support, described in section A.4.viii.c, California will incorporate ESSA and state resources to the greatest extent possible to ensure that LEAs and schools identified as needing additional assistance have the necessary support to develop or strengthen integrated and coherent processes and procedures that lead to successful student outcomes for ELs. Monitoring and Technical Assistance Describe: (ESEA section 3113(b)(8)): How the SEA will monitor the progress of each eligible entity receiving a Title III, Part A subgrant in helping English learners achieve English proficiency; and The the SEA will take to further assist eligible entities if the strategies funded under Title III, Part A are not effective, such as providing technical assistance and modifying such strategies. Monitoring Title III LEAs California provides a coordinated and transparent federal program monitoring (FPM) process to ensure Title III LEAs are meeting program requirements and spending program funds appropriately as required by law. All LEAs in the state are divided into four cohorts. Two cohorts are subject to review each year. Thus, the CDE’s FPM process includes a data review of 50 percent of the LEAs in the state to identify and conduct a total of 125 LEA on-site and online reviews during any given year. The remaining 50 percent of the LEAs in the state receive the data review the following year. A description of the FPM process, LEAs identified in each cohort, LEAs selected for online or on-site reviews, and program instruments can be found on the CDE Compliance Monitoring Web page at . Through the FPM process, III LEAs will have access to resources, instruments, training, and state and regional staff experts that will support them to prepare for the monitoring process, and, upon completion of the monitoring process, address any findings that suggest the LEA is not meeting Title IIII, Part A requirements.
strengthen comprehensive, evidence-based programs and services for all profiles of ELs that enable access to college- and career-ready learning, as well as opportunities to attain the State Seal of Biliteracy. Continuous Improvement California will monitor the implementation of these supports and will develop additional tools, toolkits, and guidance documents to support ELs, their teachers, parents, school administrators, and other school personnel, from pre-kindergarten through grade 12, as necessary based on LEA and stakeholder feedback. As part of the state’s emerging statewide system of support, described in section A.4.viii.c, California will incorporate ESSA and state resources to the greatest extent possible to ensure that LEAs and schools identified as needing additional assistance have the necessary support to develop or strengthen integrated and coherent processes and procedures that lead to successful student outcomes for ELs. Monitoring and Technical Assistance (ESEA section 3113(b)(8)): Describe: How the SEA will monitor the progress of each eligible entity receiving a Title III, Part A subgrant in helping English learners achieve English proficiency; and The the SEA will take to further assist eligible entities if the strategies funded under Title III, Part A are not effective, such as providing technical assistance and modifying such strategies. Monitoring Title III LEAs California provides a coordinated and transparent federal program monitoring (FPM) process to ensure Title III LEAs are meeting program requirements and spending program funds appropriately as required by law. All LEAs in the state are divided into four cohorts. Two cohorts are subject to review each year. Thus, the CDE’s FPM process includes a data review of 50 percent of the LEAs in the state to identify and conduct a total of 125 LEA on-site and online reviews during any given year. The remaining 50 percent of the LEAs in the state receive the data review the following year. A description of the FPM process, LEAs identified in each cohort, LEAs selected for online or on-site reviews, and program instruments can be found on the CDE Compliance Monitoring Web page at . Through the FPM process, III LEAs will have access to resources, instruments, training, and state and regional staff experts that will support them to prepare for the monitoring process, and, upon completion of the monitoring process, address any findings that suggest the LEA is not meeting Title IIII, Part A requirements.
jan18item05a3.docx