The Virtues of Enquiry Learner to think up explanations of complex sets of (VOM, p.21). ‘Ability data’ to think up illuminating scientific hypotheses or interpretations of literary ‘Ability (VOM, p.21). texts’ to recognize the salient (VOM, p.21). ‘Ability facts’ sensitivity to (VOM, p.21). ‘A detail’ The virtues: thinking of coherent explanations of the (VOM, ‘ detective’s facts’ p.114). into persons, (VOM, p.114). ‘Insights problems, theories’ in collecting and appraising (VOM, p.114). ‘Open-mindedness evidence’ (VOM, p.225). ‘Newman’s “illative sense”…’ of (VOM, p.21). ‘Adaptability intellect’ (VOM, p.123). ‘Curiosity’ Teacher in evaluating the arguments of (VOM, p.114). ‘Fairness others’ to (VOM, p.21). ‘Sensitivity detail’ (VOM, p.109). ‘Intellectual fairness’ (VOM, p.114). ‘Intellectual humility’ into persons, (VOM, p.114). ‘Insights problems, theories’ critical a virtue which enables us to avoid ‘Reflexive openness’, ‘epistemic injustice that is, failing to believe people when they ought to be believed, but – also believing someone who ought not to be believed’.
The Virtues of Enquiry Learner ‘Ability to think up explanations of complex sets of data’ (VOM, p.21). ‘Ability to think up illuminating scientific hypotheses or interpretations of literary texts’ (VOM, p.21). ‘Ability to recognize the salient facts’ (VOM, p.21). ‘A sensitivity to detail’ (VOM, p.21). ‘ The detective’s virtues: thinking of coherent explanations of the facts’ (VOM, p.114). ‘Insights into persons, problems, theories’ (VOM, p.114). ‘Open-mindedness in collecting and appraising evidence’ (VOM, p.114). ‘Newman’s “illative sense”…’ (VOM, p.225). ‘Adaptability of intellect’ (VOM, p.21). ‘Curiosity’ (VOM, p.123). Teacher ‘Fairness in evaluating the arguments of others’ (VOM, p.114). ‘Sensitivity to detail’ (VOM, p.21). ‘Intellectual fairness’ (VOM, p.109). ‘Intellectual humility’ (VOM, p.114). ‘Insights into persons, problems, theories’ (VOM, p.114). ‘Reflexive critical openness’, a virtue which enables us to avoid ‘epistemic injustice – that is, failing to believe people when they ought to be believed, but also believing someone who ought not to be believed’.
PhD%20Sean%20FINALL%202011.docx