interviewed by as key guidance the evaluation material. We are team already working supported the closely with all idea that of our EINRIP roads development should benefit partners to men and advocate for a women greater focus on equally. Many gender in our assumed this current and to be the case future believing that infrastructure roads are programs. We generally, if also understand not always, that the gender neutral. Infrastructure However, the Policy Section is absence of any currently detailed working on a consideration guidance note to to gender advise on gender issues in aspects of EINRIP infrastructure suggests the programs. project was more likely gender blind, than gender neutral. Whilst specialist gender expertise is now more often a feature of current Australian aid investments, a short case study or guidance piece which helps DFAT officers and their counterparts better appreciate why gender matters in
interviewed by the evaluation team supported the idea that EINRIP roads should benefit men and women equally. Many assumed this to be the case believing that roads are generally, if not always, gender neutral. However, the absence of any detailed consideration to gender issues in EINRIP suggests the project was more likely gender blind, than gender neutral. Whilst specialist gender expertise is now more often a feature of current Australian aid investments, a short case study or guidance piece which helps DFAT officers and their counterparts better appreciate why gender matters in as key guidance material. We are already working closely with all of our development partners to advocate for a greater focus on gender in our current and future infrastructure programs. We also understand that the Infrastructure Policy Section is currently working on a guidance note to advise on gender aspects of infrastructure programs.
investing-in-roads-einrip-completion-evaluation-report.docx