Results/Interpretations/ Provides plausible Provides a good summary of Interpretation is not objective, Has wrong, inappropriate, Conclusions interpretations results. cogent, or correct. incoherent, or confused analysis of problem. Interesting, surprising, and Context of the evaluation is Makes improper inferences. insightful. not fully reiterated in a clear Interpretation is not and concise manner. Overstates the results objective, cogent, or correct. Discusses strength, . weaknesses, and limitations. Findings are explained with Summarizes what has already Has unsupported or some depth according to each been said. exaggerated interpretations. Context of the study is research question. reiterated in a clear and Does not understand the results Does not address the concise manner. Conclusions are tied to or what has been done. significance or the empirical evidence but not implications of the problem Conclusions are both tied to explained. The explanation of empirical evidence and recommendations does not The explanation of findings explained thoroughly with Recommendations are clearly or coherently answer does not clearly or respect to the context of the explained with some research questions. coherently answer problem. foundation in either evidence community partner from the data or the extant questions. Recommendations are literature but not both. explained as founded in both evidence from the data collected and the extant literature. Implementation and Results demonstrate Results demonstrate good Results demonstrate limited Results do not establish Contributions to the Field sophisticated evidence of evidence of planning and evidence of planning and criteria for development of planning and development of development of the project. development of the project the project. the project. Some recommendations work Most or all of the Many recommendations work, with partial function of the rest. Few if any recommendations from the some need additional work to recommendations are project are more or less become viable. Results make a small functional. Major areas not functional with minor effort contribution to the field of higher started or addressed. needed to complete. education. Results make no Results are of interest to Results make a contribution to Demonstrates skills and contribution to the field of collaborating partner and/or the field of higher education. knowledge of how to implement higher education. larger community and significantly advances the An intervention/solution to a field of higher education. Demonstrates skills and problem of practice at a novice knowledge or below level.
Results/Interpretations/ Conclusions Provides plausible interpretations Interesting, surprising, and insightful. Discusses strength, weaknesses, and limitations. Context of the study is reiterated in a clear and concise manner. Conclusions are both tied to empirical evidence and explained thoroughly with respect to the context of the problem. Recommendations are explained as founded in both evidence from the data collected and the extant literature. Provides a good summary of results. Context of the evaluation is not fully reiterated in a clear and concise manner. Findings are explained with some depth according to each research question. Conclusions are tied to empirical evidence but not explained. Recommendations are explained with some foundation in either evidence from the data or the extant literature but not both. Interpretation is not objective, cogent, or correct. Makes improper inferences. Overstates the results . Summarizes what has already been said. Does not understand the results or what has been done. The explanation of recommendations does not clearly or coherently answer research questions. Has wrong, inappropriate, incoherent, or confused analysis of problem. Interpretation is not objective, cogent, or correct. Has unsupported or exaggerated interpretations. Does not address the significance or the implications of the problem The explanation of findings does not clearly or coherently answer community partner questions. Implementation and Contributions to the Field Results demonstrate sophisticated evidence of planning and development of the project. Most or all of the recommendations from the project are more or less functional with minor effort needed to complete. Results are of interest to collaborating partner and/or larger community and significantly advances the field of higher education. Results demonstrate good evidence of planning and development of the project. Many recommendations work, some need additional work to become viable. Results make a contribution to the field of higher education. Demonstrates skills and knowledge Results demonstrate limited evidence of planning and development of the project Some recommendations work with partial function of the rest. Results make a small contribution to the field of higher education. Demonstrates skills and knowledge of how to implement An intervention/solution to a problem of practice at a novice or below level. Results do not establish criteria for development of the project. Few if any recommendations are functional. Major areas not started or addressed. Results make no contribution to the field of higher education.
higher-education-masters-online-handbook-2016-v5.docx