Figure. 8 SEM image of silver nano-particless synthesized by leaf extract Colocasia esculenta TABLE 1. The LC50 and LC90 values of synthesis of Aegle marmelos, Coleus aromaticus silver nano-particless against the II, III, IV instar and pupa of under 24 h Culex quinquefasciatus exposure. Plant Larval LC50 (ppm) LC90 (ppm) Regression equation χ2 species stages (UCL-LCL) (UCL-LCL) II instar 13.14 36.18 Aegle (17.31-11.48) (40.35-34.52) 1.005 Y= 1.78 + 0.18 X marmelos III instar 16.52 54.54 (20.15-15.21) (58.16-53.22) .468 Y= 1.35 + 0.16 X IV instar 33.40 72.47 (39.36 - 31.75) (78.44-70.82) 1.237 Y= -1.05 + 0.17 X Pupa 43.21 71.98 (52.83 - 41.27) (81.60 70.04) .520 Y= -1.26 + 0.11 X – II instar 9.64 28.89 Colocasia (13.57-8.20 ) (32.52 27.45 ) 3.92 Y= 3.56 0.14 X esculenta – III instar 13.88 48.44 (17.32-12.65 ) ( 51.88-47.21) 1.383 Y= 2.19 + 0.15 X IV instar 32.69 77.22 (37.13- 31.34 ) (81.66 75.87 ) .270 Y= -1.02 + 0.17 X – Pupa 44.52 78.80 (53.29 42.96) (87.56 77.24 ) .018 Y= -1.47 + 0.13 X – –
Figure. 8 SEM image of silver nano-particless synthesized by Colocasia esculenta leaf extract TABLE 1. The LC50 and LC90 values of Aegle marmelos, Coleus aromaticus synthesis of silver nano-particless against the II, III, IV instar and pupa of Culex quinquefasciatus under 24 h exposure. Plant species Larval stages LC50 (ppm) (UCL-LCL) LC90 (ppm) (UCL-LCL) χ2 Regression equation Aegle marmelos II instar 13.14 (17.31-11.48) 36.18 (40.35-34.52) 1.005 Y= 1.78 + 0.18 X III instar 16.52 (20.15-15.21) 54.54 (58.16-53.22) .468 Y= 1.35 + 0.16 X IV instar 33.40 (39.36 - 31.75) 72.47 (78.44-70.82) 1.237 Y= -1.05 + 0.17 X Pupa 43.21 (52.83 - 41.27) 71.98 (81.60 – 70.04) .520 Y= -1.26 + 0.11 X Colocasia esculenta II instar 9.64 (13.57-8.20 ) 28.89 (32.52 – 27.45 ) 3.92 Y= 3.56 0.14 X III instar 13.88 (17.32-12.65 ) 48.44 ( 51.88-47.21) 1.383 Y= 2.19 + 0.15 X IV instar 32.69 (37.13- 31.34 ) 77.22 (81.66 – 75.87 ) .270 Y= -1.02 + 0.17 X Pupa 44.52 (53.29 – 42.96) 78.80 (87.56 – 77.24 ) .018 Y= -1.47 + 0.13 X
1429625529.docx