3 - a good application, generally complies with the requirements contained by the criterion, there are deficiencies which may make the successful implementation of the research application and attainment of high goals difficult; 4 - a very good application, complies with the requirements contained by the criterion, there are few deficiencies; 5 - an excellent application, complies with the top requirements or even exceeds the requirements contained by the criterion, any deficiencies of the application are In the course of performing evaluation of the research project proposal of the research application, experts should take into account the specifics of the relevant direction of research in interpreting criteria and, in particular, whether this is an application of fundamental or industrial research. 5.3. A research project proposal of a research application be evaluated according to the following evaluation criteria: Excellence Implementation Additional score points Impact (Evaluated by the State Education Development Agency) Quality and credibility of Improvement of Consistency and or to of to research/innovation researcher’s efficiency of the was the activities (level of novelty, potential and work plan quoting for SCOPUS sector proper observation of future career opportunities after or and intentions the intention magazines whose and gender aspects) the reception of framework in is are application the research the the Science application index there marketed in there funding of articles within be Clarity and quality of Quality of Matching of the research Web a quoting training, international measures planned planned tasks and may of mobility and knowledge for dissemination resources published application the application funding transfer between the and use of the conference be in which average researcher, the results of the scope of research applicant and the research will private the the research partner application research of included Quality of management Quality of Appropriateness the the which raise volumes within of work and integration in the communication of the technology, of to or percent research team/ institution activities for management or aid articles 50 different target structure and articles, audiences procedures, which product including risk least framework intentions framework magazines of at application management the are conference new the or Post-doctoral researcher’s Appropriateness a of scientific capacity to achieve the of the institutional Within reaches Within position of a professional environment research researcher (infrastructure) 3.1. 3.3. develop development provided.” the 3.2. develop volumes database, index 5 5 5 1 1 1
3 - a good application, generally complies with the requirements contained by the criterion, there are deficiencies which may make the successful implementation of the research application and attainment of high goals difficult; 4 - a very good application, complies with the requirements contained by the criterion, there are few deficiencies; 5 - an excellent application, complies with the top requirements or even exceeds the requirements contained by the criterion, any deficiencies of the application are In the course of performing evaluation of the research project proposal of the research application, experts should take into account the specifics of the relevant direction of research in interpreting criteria and, in particular, whether this is an application of fundamental or industrial research. 5.3. A research project proposal of a research application be evaluated according to the following evaluation criteria: Excellence Impact Implementation Additional score points (Evaluated by the State Education Development Agency) Quality and credibility of research/innovation activities (level of novelty, proper observation of and gender aspects) Improvement of researcher’s potential and future career opportunities after the reception of the research application funding Consistency and efficiency of the work plan 3.1. are intentions to raise private funding within the framework of the research application 3.2. Within the framework of the research application there are intentions to develop scientific articles, which will be published in the magazines or volumes of conference articles included in the Web of Science or SCOPUS database, or magazines or volumes of conference articles whose quoting index reaches at least 50 percent of the average quoting index in the sector 3.3. Within the framework of the research application there is intention to develop a new product or technology, which may be marketed and for the development of which aid within the scope of a research application was provided.” Clarity and quality of training, international mobility and knowledge transfer between the researcher, the research applicant and the partner Quality of measures planned for dissemination and use of the results of the research application Matching of the planned tasks and resources Quality of management work and integration in the research team/ institution Quality of communication activities for different target audiences Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures, including risk management Post-doctoral researcher’s capacity to achieve the position of a professional researcher Appropriateness of the institutional environment (infrastructure) 5 5 5 1 1 1
International_Evaluation_Guidelines_and_Criteria_for_Scientific_Part_of_Research_Applications_2.docx