Administratively Competent Decisive Non-participative Orderly Wilful Non-delegator Administratively Skilled Decisive Micromanager Organized Logical Non-egalitarian Good Administrator Intuitive Individually Oriented Autocratic Diplomatic Performance Oriented Autocratic Diplomatic Improvement-Oriented Dictatorial Worldly Excellence-Oriented Bossy Win-Win Problem Solver Performance-oriented Elitist Effective Bargainer Autonomous Face Saver Procedural Individualistic Indirect Ritualistic Independent Avoids Negatives Formal Autonomous Evasive Habitual Unique Procedural Charismatic I: Visionary Humane Orientation Self-Centered Foresight Generous Self-Centered Prepared Compassionate Non-participative Anticipatory Loner Plans Ahead Asocial Charismatic II: Inspirational Integrity Status Consciousness Enthusiastic Honest Status-Conscious Positive Sincere Class-Conscious Morale Booster Just Motive Arouser Trustworthy Charismatic III: Sacrificial Malevolent Team I: Collaborative team Risk Taker Hostile oriented Self-Sacrificial Dishonest Group-Oriented Convincing Vindictive Collaborative Irritable Loyal Consultatitive Conflict Inducer Modesty Team II: Team Normative Modest Communicative Secretive Sefl-Effacing Team Builder Intergroup Competitor Patient Informed Integrator Source: Hanges and Dickson, 2004: 131. Conceptualization of leadership advanced by the GLOBE researcher has collected positive reactions from other investigators. For instance, Earley (2006) describes the part on leadership as very sophisticated cross-cultural investigation, emphasizing the theoretical framework, the operationalisation and assessment of leadership constructs at diverse levels of examination, and the utilization of intermediary constructs. The six global leadership
Administratively Competent Orderly Administratively Skilled Organized Good Administrator Decisive Wilful Decisive Logical Intuitive Non-participative Non-delegator Micromanager Non-egalitarian Individually Oriented Autocratic Autocratic Dictatorial Bossy Elitist Diplomatic Diplomatic Worldly Win-Win Problem Solver Effective Bargainer Performance Oriented Improvement-Oriented Excellence-Oriented Performance-oriented Autonomous Individualistic Independent Autonomous Unique Face Saver Indirect Avoids Negatives Evasive Procedural Ritualistic Formal Habitual Procedural Charismatic I: Visionary Foresight Prepared Anticipatory Plans Ahead Humane Orientation Generous Compassionate Self-Centered Self-Centered Non-participative Loner Asocial Charismatic II: Inspirational Enthusiastic Positive Morale Booster Motive Arouser Integrity Honest Sincere Just Trustworthy Status Consciousness Status-Conscious Class-Conscious Charismatic III: Sacrificial Risk Taker Self-Sacrificial Convincing Malevolent Hostile Dishonest Vindictive Irritable Team I: Collaborative team oriented Group-Oriented Collaborative Loyal Consultatitive Conflict Inducer Normative Secretive Intergroup Competitor Modesty Modest Sefl-Effacing Patient Team II: Team Communicative Team Builder Informed Integrator Source: Hanges and Dickson, 2004: 131. Conceptualization of leadership advanced by the GLOBE researcher has collected positive reactions from other investigators. For instance, Earley (2006) describes the part on leadership as very sophisticated cross-cultural investigation, emphasizing the theoretical framework, the operationalisation and assessment of leadership constructs at diverse levels of examination, and the utilization of intermediary constructs. The six global leadership
PhD_Thesis_Danijela_Bogdanic.docx