Rate the presentation for the following: team’s 1 2 3 Your Presentation Components Needs improvement Satisfactory Excellent rating Delivery Poor volume, eye For the most part has Excellent volume, (speech, contact, or pace of overall satisfactory eye contact, and pace mannerisms) speech (too fast/slow) volume, eye contact, of speech and pace of speech Visuals Visually unattractive, Shows some clutter or Visually pleasing, (graphs, confusing lack of structure but enhances charts, diagrams, overall understanding powerpoints) understandable Persuasiveness Information is not Includes persuasive Main idea is (information, convincing; little or information; some communicated argument) no evidence is evidence is presented convincingly; clear presented for for arguments evidence is presented arguments for arguments Procedure The focus of the The focus of the The focus of the (model presentation was presentation was presentation was on solution) mainly on the types of partially on the the procedure to plants; little or no procedure to select select the plants information was the plants with more types of plants; presented about the focus on the plant information about procedure to select the descriptions plant descriptions plants was also included Scientific/mathematical Most of the scientific Most of the scientific All scientific and/or information and/or mathematical and/or mathematical mathematical content content was content was accurate presented was inaccurate accurate Total Score Articulate why you provided the rating for making sure to identify how the evidence was “Persuasiveness,” used, any incorrect reasoning, or exaggerated evidence. What are the strengths of this procedure? team’s Do you have any suggestions for improving this procedure? team’s
Rate the team’s presentation for the following: Presentation Components 1 Needs improvement 2 Satisfactory 3 Excellent Your rating Delivery (speech, mannerisms) Poor volume, eye contact, or pace of speech (too fast/slow) For the most part has overall satisfactory volume, eye contact, and pace of speech Excellent volume, eye contact, and pace of speech Visuals (graphs, charts, diagrams, powerpoints) Visually unattractive, confusing Shows some clutter or lack of structure but overall understandable Visually pleasing, enhances understanding Persuasiveness (information, argument) Information is not convincing; little or no evidence is presented for arguments Includes persuasive information; some evidence is presented for arguments Main idea is communicated convincingly; clear evidence is presented for arguments Procedure (model solution) The focus of the presentation was mainly on the types of plants; little or no information was presented about the procedure to select the plants The focus of the presentation was partially on the procedure to select the plants with more focus on the plant descriptions The focus of the presentation was on the procedure to select the plants types of plants; information about plant descriptions was also included Scientific/mathematical information Most of the scientific and/or mathematical content was inaccurate Most of the scientific and/or mathematical content was accurate All scientific and/or mathematical content presented was accurate Total Score Articulate why you provided the rating for “Persuasiveness,” making sure to identify how the evidence was used, any incorrect reasoning, or exaggerated evidence. What are the strengths of this team’s procedure? Do you have any suggestions for improving this team’s procedure?
PlantsVsPollutants%20DocsCombined.docx