non-energy impacts, and health and safety. This task resulted in 30 interviews completed with landlords and property managers, including 29 telephone interviews and one in-person interview. HES-IE Landlord and Property Manager Interviews – Project Characteristics Interviewers asked each landlord and property manager about one of their projects served by the program (referred to as their between July 2013 and April 2015. If the “key project”) landlord or property manager was involved with more than one participating project, interview questions focused on the project with the largest amount of gross electric savings as reported in the program database. Of the 30 projects, 24 were served by Eversource and six were served by UI. The 30 projects included 2,373 housing units, representing 7% of the projects and estimated number of units in the HES-IE participant population between July 2013 and April 2015, in total. The key projects ranged in size from five to 360 units, with an average of 79 units per project and a midpoint of 41 (Table 13)., Figure 2 compares the sample in terms of the number of units, projects, and unique landlord and property manager contacts to the participant population. Figure : HES-IE Landlord and Property Manager Interviews – Sample Comparison to HES-IE Participant Population 1 In the absence of unit-level data in participation database, the study estimated the total number of units in UI’s the UI population by multiplying the mean units per projects among the key projects (79.10) by the number of UI projects in the participation database (166). Table : HES-IE Landlord and Property Manager Interviews – Number of Units in Sample and Population HES-IE Units per Project Eversource UI1 Total1 Participant Population Average 78 - - (n=429 projects) Median 51 - - Interview Sample Average 81 72 79 (n=30 projects) Median 46 26 41 1 participation database does not capture the number of housing units in its projects; as such, the table UI’s does not report the average or median number of units among the full population. Figure 3 presents the program measure types installed at the 30 key projects. The key projects were most likely to have received incentives for refrigerators (7 projects) and insulation (7); for core services, they most often received light bulbs (29), water-saving equipment (21), and air sealing (19).
non-energy impacts, and health and safety. This task resulted in 30 interviews completed with landlords and property managers, including 29 telephone interviews and one in-person interview. HES-IE Landlord and Property Manager Interviews – Project Characteristics Interviewers asked each landlord and property manager about one of their projects served by the program (referred to as their “key project”) between July 2013 and April 2015. If the landlord or property manager was involved with more than one participating project, interview questions focused on the project with the largest amount of gross electric savings as reported in the program database. Of the 30 projects, 24 were served by Eversource and six were served by UI. The 30 projects included 2,373 housing units, representing 7% of the projects and estimated number of units in the HES-IE participant population between July 2013 and April 2015, in total. The key projects ranged in size from five to 360 units, with an average of 79 units per project and a midpoint of 41 (Table 13)., Figure 2 compares the sample in terms of the number of units, projects, and unique landlord and property manager contacts to the participant population. Figure : HES-IE Landlord and Property Manager Interviews – Sample Comparison to HES-IE Participant Population 1 In the absence of unit-level data in UI’s participation database, the study estimated the total number of units in the UI population by multiplying the mean units per projects among the key projects (79.10) by the number of UI projects in the participation database (166). Table : HES-IE Landlord and Property Manager Interviews – Number of Units in Sample and Population HES-IE Units per Project Eversource UI1 Total1 Participant Population (n=429 projects) Average 78 - - Median 51 - - Interview Sample (n=30 projects) Average 81 72 79 Median 46 26 41 1 UI’s participation database does not capture the number of housing units in its projects; as such, the table does not report the average or median number of units among the full population. Figure 3 presents the program measure types installed at the 30 key projects. The key projects were most likely to have received incentives for refrigerators (7 projects) and insulation (7); for core services, they most often received light bulbs (29), water-saving equipment (21), and air sealing (19).
HES%20and%20HES-IE%20Process%20Evaluation%20(R4)%20and%20Real-Time%20Research%20(R31)%20-%20Review%20Draft.docx