individual counselling. There Smoking is not enough evidence to Cessation support the use of particular psychological components in Adults a programme beyond the support and skills training normally included. Bryant,J. et al, Systematic Abstinence There is some evidence of Thirty-two relevant studies were +/- 2011. Review rates at effective interventions in the included. The majority (n=20) short-term (< short term with low income were of low quality. Behavioural 3 months) female smokers and in the Results of the meta-analysis smoking and long-term longer term with individuals showed a significant increase in cessation (6 months or with mental illness. cessation for behavioural support interventions the longest) interventions targeted at in selected follow-up. female smokers at follow-up [RR 1.68, CI 1.21-2.33] groups. behavioural support Smoking interventions targeted at Cessation individuals with a mental illness at long-term follow-up (RR 1.35, Adults CI 1.01-1.81). Results of the narrative review showed several promising interventions that increased cessation at 6-month or longer follow-up. Grimshaw G, Systematic Primary: There is insufficient evidence 24 trials involving over 5000 0 Include et al, 2010 Review change in to recommend an approach. young people met inclusion smoking Complex approaches show criteria (11 cluster-RCTs, 11 behaviour promise, especially those RCTs and 2 CTs). incorporating elements
Smoking Cessation Adults individual counselling. There is not enough evidence to support the use of particular psychological components in a programme beyond the support and skills training normally included. Bryant,J. et al, 2011. Behavioural smoking cessation interventions in selected groups. Smoking Cessation Adults Systematic Review Abstinence rates at short-term (< 3 months) and long-term (6 months or the longest) follow-up. There is some evidence of effective interventions in the short term with low income female smokers and in the longer term with individuals with mental illness. Thirty-two relevant studies were included. The majority (n=20) were of low quality. Results of the meta-analysis showed a significant increase in cessation for behavioural support interventions targeted at female smokers at follow-up [RR 1.68, CI 1.21-2.33] behavioural support interventions targeted at individuals with a mental illness at long-term follow-up (RR 1.35, CI 1.01-1.81). Results of the narrative review showed several promising interventions that increased cessation at 6-month or longer follow-up. +/- Grimshaw G, et al, 2010 Systematic Review Primary: change in smoking behaviour There is insufficient evidence to recommend an approach. Complex approaches show promise, especially those incorporating elements 24 trials involving over 5000 young people met inclusion criteria (11 cluster-RCTs, 11 RCTs and 2 CTs). 0 Include
Initiative%20Evidence%20Assessment%20Report%20Stop%20Smoking%20Wales%20Final.docx