Outcome 2. Outputs: Global monitoring Output 2.1: Common monitoring indicators and methods for snow leopard landscapes and populations developed, tested and disseminated framework Output 2.2: Spatial database for monitoring and management of one transboundary landscape is developed developed for Output 2.3: Sustainable landscape management measures are identified and presented to stakeholders for implementation snow leopard ecosystems, # Countries using None At least 2 Common monitoring Risks: demonstrated and approved/adopted common framework Monitoring framework is not adopted by range monitoring Approval document used because it is not aligned countries indicators/framework with existing national monitoring frameworks # transboundary snow leopard 0 1 Geospatial assessment landscapes with sustainable Agreed management priorities Assumptions: management measures agreed with M&E system Stakeholder institutions are to reduce key threats Project reports willing to share information with other countries # women in the pilot 0 Kyrgyz part 20% Project reports landscape directly benefiting 0 Kazakhstan part 2% from new sustainable management measures: Outcome 3. Output 3.1: Global coordination mechanism for technical support, resource development and knowledge-sharing is strengthened Effective and Output 3.2: Global and national tools for financing snow leopard ecosystem conservation developed, piloted and shared Output 3.3: Private sector dialogue platforms established sustainable transboundary Capacity of, and satisfaction To be determined 20% increase on the Capacity/Satisfaction surveys Risks: conservation with, GSLEP coordination during inception baseline score of GSLEP coordination from Long-term core funding for mechanism for phase focal points and international the GSLEP Secretariat does snow leopard partners not materialise ecosystems Level of financing for GSLEP GSLEP 25-30% increase on Financing records Further economic downturn Secretariat and at least 2 Secretariat: the baseline (at least Agreements with private hinders private sector national programmes $ 93,300 p.a. 5% of which from sector commitment to (NSLEPs) private sector) environmental sustainability Kazakhstan: $123,857 p.a. Assumptions: Government of Kyrgyz Kyrgyzstan: Republic maintains its $252,857 p.a. support for GSLEP after the
Outcome 2. Global monitoring framework developed for snow leopard ecosystems, demonstrated and adopted by range countries Outputs: Output 2.1: Common monitoring indicators and methods for snow leopard landscapes and populations developed, tested and disseminated Output 2.2: Spatial database for monitoring and management of one transboundary landscape is developed Output 2.3: Sustainable landscape management measures are identified and presented to stakeholders for implementation # Countries using approved/adopted common monitoring indicators/framework None At least 2 Common monitoring framework Approval document Risks: Monitoring framework is not used because it is not aligned with existing national monitoring frameworks Assumptions: Stakeholder institutions are willing to share information with other countries # transboundary snow leopard landscapes with sustainable management measures agreed to reduce key threats 0 1 Geospatial assessment Agreed management priorities with M&E system Project reports # women in the pilot landscape directly benefiting from new sustainable management measures: 0 Kyrgyz part 0 Kazakhstan part 20% 2% Project reports Outcome 3. Effective and sustainable transboundary conservation mechanism for snow leopard ecosystems Output 3.1: Global coordination mechanism for technical support, resource development and knowledge-sharing is strengthened Output 3.2: Global and national tools for financing snow leopard ecosystem conservation developed, piloted and shared Output 3.3: Private sector dialogue platforms established Capacity of, and satisfaction with, GSLEP coordination To be determined during inception phase 20% increase on the baseline score Capacity/Satisfaction surveys of GSLEP coordination from focal points and international partners Risks: Long-term core funding for the GSLEP Secretariat does not materialise Further economic downturn hinders private sector commitment to environmental sustainability Assumptions: Government of Kyrgyz Republic maintains its support for GSLEP after the Level of financing for GSLEP Secretariat and at least 2 national programmes (NSLEPs) GSLEP Secretariat: $ 93,300 p.a. Kazakhstan: $123,857 p.a. Kyrgyzstan: $252,857 p.a. 25-30% increase on the baseline (at least 5% of which from private sector) Financing records Agreements with private sector
PIMS_5413_BD_Snow_Leopard_Prodoc__final_3Jun16.docx