Project Outcome 2 2.1: Strengthened institutional i) ICCWC Indicator At project Project Manager/ ICCWC Indicator Assumptions: Assessments Strengthened Framework inception; M&E officer Framework are carried out consistently capacity to combat IWT as institutional capacity assessments MTR and TE Coordinator IP assessment reports; between years and agencies indicated by for regulatory ii) UNDP CD UNDP CD Scorecard i) the ICCWC Indicator coordination, Scorecard assessment reports; Strengthened inter-agency Framework (note – baselines to implementation and assessments Information System is collaboration is reflected in be determined in year 1), ii) enforcement at the iii) Operational fully operational and the increased scores UNDP Capacity Development national and database within operated by trained Scorecard for Gakkum (see international levels Gakkum staff Political support continues Annex 18), and iii) iii) for DG Law Enforcement’s Operational status of Gakkum’s role in managing the Information System information system on WT Risks: Difficulty to find trained staff to conduct ICCWC IF assessments Lack of collaboration from key partners constrains effective information flow 2.2: WCU database Annually Project Manager/ WCU database; project Assumptions: Official - annual number M&E officer reports national statistics are made seizures/arrests Coordinator IP available to the project as - annual number of successful required in a timely manner prosecutions Risks: Corruption and interference in enforcement operations
Project Outcome 2 Strengthened institutional capacity for regulatory coordination, implementation and enforcement at the national and international levels 2.1: Strengthened institutional capacity to combat IWT as indicated by i) the ICCWC Indicator Framework (note – baselines to be determined in year 1), ii) UNDP Capacity Development Scorecard for Gakkum (see Annex 18), and iii) iii) Operational status of Gakkum’s Information System i) ICCWC Indicator Framework assessments ii) UNDP CD Scorecard assessments iii) Operational database within Gakkum At project inception; MTR and TE Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP ICCWC Indicator Framework assessment reports; UNDP CD Scorecard assessment reports; Information System is fully operational and operated by trained staff Assumptions: Assessments are carried out consistently between years and agencies Strengthened inter-agency collaboration is reflected in the increased scores Political support continues for DG Law Enforcement’s role in managing the information system on WT Risks: Difficulty to find trained staff to conduct ICCWC IF assessments Lack of collaboration from key partners constrains effective information flow 2.2: - annual number seizures/arrests - annual number of successful prosecutions WCU database Annually Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP WCU database; project reports Assumptions: Official national statistics are made available to the project as required in a timely manner Risks: Corruption and interference in enforcement operations
PIMS_5391_IWT_Indonesia__Prodoc_resubmission_April_5__2017.docx