Lowest Maximum Time ‘Average Region Adjusted Charge Fee x Score (Hourly) Values’ = ‘Weighted Score’ Potential Provider's Region Adjusted ‘Average Values’ The following example shows how the Hourly Region Adjusted ‘Average are evaluated; the same steps are taken to evaluate the Daily Values’ Region Adjusted ‘Average Values’. Worked example of Region Adjusted calculation ‘Average Values’ score (Hourly rate, Architect - Core Service Discipline) Supplier 3 submits the lowest Hourly Region Adjusted ‘Average Values’ of £150. Supplier 3 is awarded the Time Charge Fee Score ‘Maximum (Hourly)’ of 2.500%; Supplier 1 submits an Region Adjusted of £200. As ‘Average Values’ the Tender is higher than Supplier price, Supplier 1 is awarded 75% of the 3’s Time Charge Fee Score namely a of ‘Maximum (Hourly)’, ‘Weighted Score’ 1.880%; Supplier 2 submits an Region Adjusted of £175. As ‘Average Values’ the Tender is higher than Supplier price, Supplier 1 is awarded 86% of the 3’s Time Charge Fee Score namely a of ‘Maximum (Hourly)’, ‘Weighted Score’ 2.140%. Hourly Rates Maximum Average Region Time Charge Lowest Weighted Tenderer Adjusted Fee Score Tender Score (%) Value (Hourly) Supplier 1 £200.00 2.500% 1.880% Supplier 2 £175.00 2.500% 2.140% Supplier 3 £150.00 2.500% £150.00 2.500% 17.3.3. The Potential (highlighted orange), is combined for Provider’s ‘Weighted Score’ each Core Service Discipline and provides a Time Charge Fee ‘Total Score’, with a maximum Time Charge Fee score of 5% (including both Hourly and Daily maximum scores) available to Potential Providers. 18. Final Tender Summary Evaluation 18.1. Upon completion of the Percentage Project Fee and Time Charge ‘Total Score’ ‘Total Fee evaluation, the two scores are combined to provide a final Weighted Score’ ‘Total Score’.
Lowest ‘Average Region Adjusted Values’ x Maximum Time Charge Fee Score (Hourly) ‘Weighted Score’ = Potential Provider's ‘Average Region Adjusted Values’ The following example shows how the Hourly ‘Average Region Adjusted Values’ are evaluated; the same steps are taken to evaluate the Daily ‘Average Region Adjusted Values’. Worked example of ‘Average Region Adjusted Values’ score calculation (Hourly rate, Architect - Core Service Discipline) Supplier 3 submits the lowest Hourly ‘Average Region Adjusted Values’ of £150. Supplier 3 is awarded the ‘Maximum Time Charge Fee Score (Hourly)’ of 2.500%; Supplier 1 submits an ‘Average Region Adjusted Values’ of £200. As the Tender is higher than Supplier 3’s price, Supplier 1 is awarded 75% of the ‘Maximum Time Charge Fee Score (Hourly)’, namely a ‘Weighted Score’ of 1.880%; Supplier 2 submits an ‘Average Region Adjusted Values’ of £175. As the Tender is higher than Supplier 3’s price, Supplier 1 is awarded 86% of the ‘Maximum Time Charge Fee Score (Hourly)’, namely a ‘Weighted Score’ of 2.140%. Hourly Rates Tenderer Average Region Adjusted Value Maximum Time Charge Fee Score (Hourly) Lowest Tender Weighted Score (%) Supplier 1 £200.00 2.500% 1.880% Supplier 2 £175.00 2.500% 2.140% Supplier 3 £150.00 2.500% £150.00 2.500% 17.3.3. The Potential Provider’s ‘Weighted Score’ (highlighted orange), is combined for each Core Service Discipline and provides a ‘Total Time Charge Fee Score’, with a maximum Time Charge Fee score of 5% (including both Hourly and Daily maximum scores) available to Potential Providers. 18. Final Tender Summary Evaluation 18.1. Upon completion of the ‘Total Percentage Project Fee Score’ and ‘Total Time Charge Fee Score’ evaluation, the two scores are combined to provide a final ‘Total Weighted Score’.
PMFDTS%20Price%20Model%20and%20Price%20Evaluation%20Guidance%2018%20V%203.docx