Q74 Highlighted transfer sites do not manage waste, only Transfer tonnes for Non-hazardous, Inert and Hazardous transfer. This was taken into account in figures waste are specifically identified in Tables 8, 10 and 12 (Grundon). respectively. The use of waste received as a proxy for waste management capacity should only be an interim position Agreed, please also see response to Q.71 above. In until more accurate data is obtained (Oxfordshire County addition a number of sources for waste capacity will be Council) explored with reference to different confidence levels. Q75 Waste Data Flow Department for Environment, Food Waste Data Flow will be used to provide accurate arising – and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (should be included in figures for LACW, as a component within the Household Environment Agency Waste Data Interrogator) (Royal Industrial and Commercial waste stream. Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) Greater recognition of smaller facilities in UK for Noted, to be considered for the Preferred Options specialist hazardous waste. Some sites are not regulated consultation. by Environment Agency so have no precise data. Environment Agency permitted void data (Environment Agency). Radioactive data (Grundon). As above. Lack of up to date data. Suggestion of annual surveys As per response to Q.71 above. (Biffa) Q78 Support for method. from other Mineral Planning Noted. Authority to compare if necessary (Surrey County Council). Noted. Weighting of capacity estimates will be explored as Differing weight should be applied to different methods other Waste Planning Authorities have done. Please also depending on their robustness (Biffa). refer to Q.74 comment above. Q82 published data Statistics on Waste” Other methodologies will be explored in the Preferred “UK (December 2016) and of Waste and Resource Options consultation. “Digest Statistics” (March 2017) (Biffa) Different growth rates will be applied. Household Municipal
Q74 Highlighted transfer sites do not manage waste, only transfer. This was taken into account in figures (Grundon). The use of waste received as a proxy for waste management capacity should only be an interim position until more accurate data is obtained (Oxfordshire County Council) Transfer tonnes for Non-hazardous, Inert and Hazardous waste are specifically identified in Tables 8, 10 and 12 respectively. Agreed, please also see response to Q.71 above. In addition a number of sources for waste capacity will be explored with reference to different confidence levels. Q75 Waste Data Flow – Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (should be included in Environment Agency Waste Data Interrogator) (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) Greater recognition of smaller facilities in UK for specialist hazardous waste. Some sites are not regulated by Environment Agency so have no precise data. Environment Agency permitted void data (Environment Agency). Radioactive data (Grundon). Lack of up to date data. Suggestion of annual surveys (Biffa) Waste Data Flow will be used to provide accurate arising figures for LACW, as a component within the Household Industrial and Commercial waste stream. Noted, to be considered for the Preferred Options consultation. As above. As per response to Q.71 above. Q78 Support for method. from other Mineral Planning Authority to compare if necessary (Surrey County Council). Differing weight should be applied to different methods depending on their robustness (Biffa). Noted. Noted. Weighting of capacity estimates will be explored as other Waste Planning Authorities have done. Please also refer to Q.74 comment above. Q82 published data “UK Statistics on Waste” (December 2016) and “Digest of Waste and Resource Statistics” (March 2017) (Biffa) Other methodologies will be explored in the Preferred Options consultation. Different growth rates will be applied. Household Municipal
JCEBFinalIOconsultationstatementSept2017.docx