Time constraints Limited availability Difficulty to adhere to Clear communication minimised face - stakeholders of key technical timelines to face requirements, frequent personnel within monitoring of project deliverables and stakeholder groups revised schedules where necessary to take advantage of participation by key stakeholders with the least amount of disruption to daily workloads. Time constraints Limited availability Difficulty to adhere to Clear communication minimised face collaborators / of key technical and timelines to face requirements, frequent – partners (e.g. testing personnel monitoring of project deliverables and RCPA QAP, within collaborating revised schedules where necessary to Cancer Institute / partner take advantage of participation by NSW, HL7 organisations Working groups / collaborators with Australia, the least amount of disruption to daily Melbourne workloads. Genomics PITUS 15-16 Project Officer provided Health Alliance) project support to collaborators / partners, including assistance with testing and documentation. Time constraints Workforce Difficulty to adhere to Clear communication minimised face - discipline shortage, limited timelines to face requirements, frequent specific availability of monitoring of project deliverables and pathologist discipline specific revised schedules where necessary to pathologist take advantage of participation by key pathologists with the least amount of disruption to daily workloads. Difficulty - Difference of Difficulty to adhere to Key opinion leaders were included on agreeing - what professional timelines and project the Project and on the PITUS 15-16 to include in opinion. may not have been Steering Committee to ensure Standard. completed. adequate representation and expertise. Lack of Difference of Limitation of buy-in Transparent communication of acceptance by professional from profession objectives, clear reasoning in support Fellows. opinion. without enforced of the Standards, included key Standards stakeholders throughout the development process Change of Difference of Fragmented PITUS 15-16 wg1 members joined the governance professional opinion approach to develop HL7 O&O working group Australia’s structure at HL7 and approach to Standards and collaborated on the standards
Time constraints - stakeholders Limited availability of key technical personnel within stakeholder groups Difficulty to adhere to timelines Clear communication minimised face to face requirements, frequent monitoring of project deliverables and revised schedules where necessary to take advantage of participation by key stakeholders with the least amount of disruption to daily workloads. Time constraints – collaborators / partners (e.g. RCPA QAP, Cancer Institute NSW, HL7 Australia, Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance) Limited availability of key technical and testing personnel within collaborating / partner organisations Difficulty to adhere to timelines Clear communication minimised face to face requirements, frequent monitoring of project deliverables and revised schedules where necessary to take advantage of participation by Working groups / collaborators with the least amount of disruption to daily workloads. PITUS 15-16 Project Officer provided project support to collaborators / partners, including assistance with testing and documentation. Time constraints - discipline specific pathologist Workforce shortage, limited availability of discipline specific pathologist Difficulty to adhere to timelines Clear communication minimised face to face requirements, frequent monitoring of project deliverables and revised schedules where necessary to take advantage of participation by key pathologists with the least amount of disruption to daily workloads. Difficulty - agreeing - what to include in Standard. Difference of professional opinion. Difficulty to adhere to timelines and project may not have been completed. Key opinion leaders were included on the Project and on the PITUS 15-16 Steering Committee to ensure adequate representation and expertise. Lack of acceptance by Fellows. Difference of professional opinion. Limitation of buy-in from profession without enforced Standards Transparent communication of objectives, clear reasoning in support of the Standards, included key stakeholders throughout the development process Change of governance structure at HL7 Difference of professional opinion and approach to Fragmented approach to develop Standards PITUS 15-16 wg1 members joined the HL7 Australia’s O&O working group and collaborated on the standards
PITUS-15-16_Final-report%2015%20May%202017.docx