differentiate cochlear and retrocochlear pathology. Same study can be used for development of speech perception research materials. It will further enrich the field of Audiology. Limitations of the Study Less number of sample sizes in order to establish a normative and to validate disorder population such as Learning Disability. To develop a more valid tool few heterogeneous stimulus pattern may be excluded from the final list. Qualitative analysis is not inferential into the to establish disorder norms. Future Directions Measurement procedure of adjusted score in SSW test may be further studied to confirm the site of lesion and the amount of (C) APD. SSW test material may be further developed and standardized in Indian languages. The study may be incorporated to see the therapeutic improvement in adverse listening condition for (C) APD and that may formulate a prognostic matrix. SSW test performance in normal listeners and in different (C) APD subjects may be further validated with the help of f-MRI or advanced radiological studies can pinpoint the site of lesion. Practice effect on SSW test may be further documented as an evidence of understanding of adaptive learning. REFERENCES American Speech- Language- Hearing Association. (2005). practice in (Positional statement). www.asha.org/policy communication disorders American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1996). Central Auditory Processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. American 41–54. Journal of Audiology, 5(2), Arnst, D. J. (1981). Errors on the Staggered Spondaic Word (SSW) Test in a group of adult normal listeners. 112-116. Ear and Hearing, 2(3), Bamiou, D. E., Liasis, A., Boyd, S., Cohen, M., & Raglan, E. (2000). Central auditory processing disorder as the presenting manifestation of subtle brain pathology. 168-172. Audilogy, 39 (3). Bamiou, D.E., Musiek, F. E. & Luxon, L.M. (2001). Aetiology and Clinical Presentations of auditory processing disorders: A review. Archives of the Disordered 85,361-365. Child, Bellis, T. J. (2003). When the brain can‘t hears: Unravelling the mystery of auditory processing disorder. New York: Pocket Books.
differentiate cochlear and retrocochlear pathology. Same study can be used for development of speech perception research materials. It will further enrich the field of Audiology. Limitations of the Study Less number of sample sizes in order to establish a normative and to validate disorder population such as Learning Disability. To develop a more valid tool few heterogeneous stimulus pattern may be excluded from the final list. Qualitative analysis is not inferential into the to establish disorder norms. Future Directions Measurement procedure of adjusted score in SSW test may be further studied to confirm the site of lesion and the amount of (C) APD. SSW test material may be further developed and standardized in Indian languages. The study may be incorporated to see the therapeutic improvement in adverse listening condition for (C) APD and that may formulate a prognostic matrix. SSW test performance in normal listeners and in different (C) APD subjects may be further validated with the help of f-MRI or advanced radiological studies can pinpoint the site of lesion. Practice effect on SSW test may be further documented as an evidence of understanding of adaptive learning. REFERENCES American Speech- Language- Hearing Association. (2005). practice in communication disorders (Positional statement). www.asha.org/policy American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1996). Central Auditory Processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. American Journal of Audiology, 5(2), 41–54. Arnst, D. J. (1981). Errors on the Staggered Spondaic Word (SSW) Test in a group of adult normal listeners. Ear and Hearing, 2(3), 112-116. Bamiou, D. E., Liasis, A., Boyd, S., Cohen, M., & Raglan, E. (2000). Central auditory processing disorder as the presenting manifestation of subtle brain pathology. Audilogy, 39 (3). 168-172. Bamiou, D.E., Musiek, F. E. & Luxon, L.M. (2001). Aetiology and Clinical Presentations of auditory processing disorders: A review. Archives of the Disordered Child, 85,361-365. Bellis, T. J. (2003). When the brain can‘t hears: Unravelling the mystery of auditory processing disorder. New York: Pocket Books.
1466756944.docx