ANNEX 2 TO RESOLUTION [A] (WRC-19) List of criteria for the application of 3 resolves 1 Submission of Notification Publication Information. 2 Entry into satellite manufacturing or procurement agreement, and into satellite launch agreement. The non-geostationary FSS system operator should possess: i) clear evidence of a binding agreement for the manufacture or procurement of its satellites; and ii) evidence of a binding agreement to launch its satellites. The manufacturing or procurement agreement should identify the contract milestones leading to the completion of manufacture or procurement of satellites required for the service provision, and the launch agreement should identify the launch date, launch site and launch service provider. The notifying administration is responsible for authenticating the evidence of agreement. The information required under this criterion may be submitted in the form of a written commitment by the responsible administration. 3 As an alternative to satellite manufacturing or procurement and launch agreements, clear evidence of guaranteed funding arrangements for the implementation of the project would be accepted. The notifying administration is responsible for authenticating the evidence of these arrangements and for providing such evidence to other interested administrations in furtherance of its obligations under this Resolution. Reasons: To provide a methodology to ensure that aggregate GSO protection levels are never exceeded and to provide a mechanism to monitor the aggregate limits from the operation of actual non-GSO systems MOD RESOLUTION 750 Compatibility between the Earth exploration-satellite service (passive) and relevant active services The World Radiocommunication Conference (Sharm el-Sheikh, 2019), …
ANNEX 2 TO RESOLUTION [A] (WRC-19) List of criteria for the application of resolves 3 1 Submission of Notification Publication Information. 2 Entry into satellite manufacturing or procurement agreement, and into satellite launch agreement. The non-geostationary FSS system operator should possess: i) clear evidence of a binding agreement for the manufacture or procurement of its satellites; and ii) evidence of a binding agreement to launch its satellites. The manufacturing or procurement agreement should identify the contract milestones leading to the completion of manufacture or procurement of satellites required for the service provision, and the launch agreement should identify the launch date, launch site and launch service provider. The notifying administration is responsible for authenticating the evidence of agreement. The information required under this criterion may be submitted in the form of a written commitment by the responsible administration. 3 As an alternative to satellite manufacturing or procurement and launch agreements, clear evidence of guaranteed funding arrangements for the implementation of the project would be accepted. The notifying administration is responsible for authenticating the evidence of these arrangements and for providing such evidence to other interested administrations in furtherance of its obligations under this Resolution. Reasons: To provide a methodology to ensure that aggregate GSO protection levels are never exceeded and to provide a mechanism to monitor the aggregate limits from the operation of actual non-GSO systems MOD RESOLUTION 750 Compatibility between the Earth exploration-satellite service (passive) and relevant active services The World Radiocommunication Conference (Sharm el-Sheikh, 2019), …
IWG-3_42_1.6proposalRev3_9_19_18.docx