narrative. somewhat transitions Results are organized in that smoothly. missing. The selection of the narrative Tables and results presented progresses in a Results presented figures are may be considered meaningful way. without reference neither provided as the most salient to what may be nor sufficiently to the study. There is a selective considered most explained in text. presentation of relevant to that Tables and figures results that are particular study. Tables and are provided and salient but still not figures are used used to selecting the most Tables and figures to replace supplement salient. are neither explanation of explanations in provided nor results rather text. Tables and figures sufficiently than are provided yet explained in text. supplement. not explained in detail Provides plausible Provides a good Interpretation is not Has wrong, Conclusions interpretations summary of objective, cogent, inappropriate, results. or correct. incoherent, or Interesting, confused surprising, and Context of the Makes improper analysis of insightful. evaluation is not inferences. problem. fully reiterated in a Discusses clear and concise Overstates the Interpretation is strength, manner. results not weaknesses, and . objective, limitations. Findings are Summarizes what cogent, or explained with has already been correct. Context of the some depth said. study is reiterated according to each Has unsupported in a clear and research question. Does not or exaggerated concise manner. understand the interpretations. Conclusions are results or what has Conclusions are tied to empirical been done. Does not both tied to evidence but not address the empirical evidence explained. The explanation of significance or and explained recommendations the implications thoroughly with Recommendations does not clearly or of the problem respect to the are explained with coherently answer context of the some foundation in research The explanation problem. either evidence questions. of findings does from the data or not clearly or Recommendations the extant literature coherently are explained as but not both. answer founded in both community evidence from the partner data collected and questions. the extant literature. Implementation and Results Results Results Results do not Contributions to the demonstrate demonstrate good demonstrate establish criteria Field sophisticated evidence of limited evidence of for development evidence of planning and planning and of the project. planning and development of the development of the development of the project. project project. Few if any Some Most or all of the Many recommendations are functional.
narrative. The selection of results presented may be considered as the most salient to the study. Tables and figures are provided and used to supplement explanations in text. somewhat organized in that the narrative progresses in a meaningful way. There is a selective presentation of results that are salient but still not selecting the most salient. Tables and figures are provided yet not explained in detail transitions smoothly. Results presented without reference to what may be considered most relevant to that particular study. Tables and figures are neither provided nor sufficiently explained in text. Results are missing. Tables and figures are neither provided nor sufficiently explained in text. Tables and figures are used to replace explanation of results rather than supplement. Conclusions Provides plausible interpretations Interesting, surprising, and insightful. Discusses strength, weaknesses, and limitations. Context of the study is reiterated in a clear and concise manner. Conclusions are both tied to empirical evidence and explained thoroughly with respect to the context of the problem. Recommendations are explained as founded in both evidence from the data collected and the extant literature. Provides a good summary of results. Context of the evaluation is not fully reiterated in a clear and concise manner. Findings are explained with some depth according to each research question. Conclusions are tied to empirical evidence but not explained. Recommendations are explained with some foundation in either evidence from the data or the extant literature but not both. Interpretation is not objective, cogent, or correct. Makes improper inferences. Overstates the results . Summarizes what has already been said. Does not understand the results or what has been done. The explanation of recommendations does not clearly or coherently answer research questions. Has wrong, inappropriate, incoherent, or confused analysis of problem. Interpretation is not objective, cogent, or correct. Has unsupported or exaggerated interpretations. Does not address the significance or the implications of the problem The explanation of findings does not clearly or coherently answer community partner questions. Implementation and Contributions to the Field Results demonstrate sophisticated evidence of planning and development of the project. Most or all of the Results demonstrate good evidence of planning and development of the project. Many Results demonstrate limited evidence of planning and development of the project Some recommendations Results do not establish criteria for development of the project. Few if any are functional.
higher-education-masters-on-campus-handbook-fall-2017.docx