possible if methodology complies with RED methodology and is verifiable. In this case, duly justification and flagging in documentation required. Verify whether the calculation of GHG emissions was conducted according to the methodology of ISCC 205 taking into account all relevant inputs. Consider especially if for (mineral and organic) and crop residues the N2O-field emission have been included in the calculation. 7.3.5. Were net GHG emissions from The calculation of GHG emissions Transparent documentation of the Please indicate, if any land use change (el) from land use change took calculation and documentation of land use change (not calculated according to the according to the respective results and of input data. violating ISCC Principle respective formula (see ISCC formula and all relevant inputs 1) took place: 205)? Are all inputs for the have been taken into account, in single factors of the formula particular: documented and verifiable? Carbon stock of reference Are all inputs and results area per hectare X available in the required Carbon stock of cultivation units? area per hectare Yield per hectare and year Note: Please indicate in if any land use “Findings” change (not violating ISCC Principle 1) took place. 7.3.6. Calculation of emission Were only the following measures Production records savings from improved integrated: agricultural management Shifting to reduced or (esca) X Improved crop rotations Transparent documentation of the and/or crops, including calculation and documentation of crop residue management; results and of input data.
possible if methodology complies with RED methodology and is verifiable. In this case, duly justification and flagging in documentation required. Verify whether the calculation of GHG emissions was conducted according to the methodology of ISCC 205 taking into account all relevant inputs. Consider especially if for (mineral and organic) and crop residues the N2O-field emission have been included in the calculation. 7.3.5. Were net GHG emissions from land use change (el) calculated according to the respective formula (see ISCC 205)? Are all inputs for the single factors of the formula documented and verifiable? Are all inputs and results available in the required units? Note: Please indicate in “Findings” if any land use change (not violating ISCC Principle 1) took place. The calculation of GHG emissions from land use change took according to the respective formula and all relevant inputs have been taken into account, in particular: Carbon stock of reference area per hectare Carbon stock of cultivation area per hectare Yield per hectare and year Transparent documentation of the calculation and documentation of results and of input data. X Please indicate, if any land use change (not violating ISCC Principle 1) took place: 7.3.6. Calculation of emission savings from improved agricultural management (esca) Were only the following measures integrated: Shifting to reduced or Improved crop rotations and/or crops, including crop residue management; Production records Transparent documentation of the calculation and documentation of results and of input data. X
ISCC_EU_Procedure_Farm_Plantation_v3.2.docx