in and direct consider it relevant national and regional provided and levels of engagement at five engage with, and nine. judicial to the development levels. regional leadership meetings and 33 contribute input and development needs of their court approved Responsive Fund activities. strategic direction to across the region and that it facilitates PJDP Projects. through ongoing sharing solutions to support to common challenges networks of chief justices and their Participants' perceptions of delegates for the quality of the workshop dialogue and and engagement with PJDP sharing experience and regional counterparts. about aspects of judicial development, including programme management. 2.3 Responsive Fund Number of Responsive Fund 90% of Responsive All PICs successfully applications successfully Fund allocated in develop their capabilities delivered with minimal NC reports / MSC PICs increasingly 19 RF activities were successfully LoV9 expended, to formulate cogent assistance from the PJDP confirmation. manage their own completed by June 2012 in 12 PICs and 13 70% of activities No RF activities applications to support NC / Team. locally-delivered more applications have been approved MSC 6-monthly achieve their aims implemented. priority development MSC development since July 2012. All activities will be The Responsive Fund and annual and with less activities and implement activities. completed by June 2013. managed effectively and progress reports. support from the associated activities efficiently (including financial PJDP Team. which achieve their aims. expenditure) by the MSC. 2.4 National Judicial Development Committee (NJDC) Project APIC can strategically The capabilities of One PIC has NJDCs exist in some ARegional NJDC toolkit is currently being MSC assistance to TA reports. TA plan and manage their one PIC to established NJDCs but not all PICs with developed and will be piloted in Samoa. strengthen NJDCs is tailored
in and direct judicial development across the region through ongoing support to networks of chief justices and their delegates for dialogue and sharing experience about aspects of judicial development, including programme management. consider it relevant to the development needs of their court and that it facilitates sharing solutions to common challenges national and regional levels. provided and levels of engagement at five regional leadership meetings and 33 approved Responsive Fund activities. engage with, and contribute input and strategic direction to PJDP Projects. nine. Participants' perceptions of the quality of the workshop and engagement with PJDP and regional counterparts. 2.3 Responsive Fund PICs increasingly manage their own locally-delivered development activities. 90% of Responsive Fund allocated in LoV9 expended, 70% of activities achieve their aims and with less support from the PJDP Team. No RF activities implemented. 19 RF activities were successfully completed by June 2012 in 12 PICs and 13 more applications have been approved since July 2012. All activities will be completed by June 2013. All PICs successfully develop their capabilities to formulate cogent applications to support priority development activities and implement associated activities which achieve their aims. Number of Responsive Fund applications successfully delivered with minimal assistance from the PJDP Team. The Responsive Fund managed effectively and efficiently (including financial expenditure) by the MSC. NC reports / MSC confirmation. MSC 6-monthly and annual progress reports. NC / MSC 2.4 National Judicial Development Committee (NJDC) Project The capabilities of one PIC to One PIC has established NJDCs NJDCs exist in some but not all PICs with ARegional NJDC toolkit is currently being developed and will be piloted in Samoa. APIC can strategically plan and manage their MSC assistance to strengthen NJDCs is tailored TA reports. TA
PJDP-24month-ext-2013-2015.docx