The MSC ensures that this initiative does not duplicate the work of other initiatives (eg RRRT). In its approach to implementation, the MSC will explore the possibility of adapting resources developed by other initiatives where appropriate rather than re-inventing the wheel to ensure cost-effectiveness and value for money. 2.0 Governance Three CoJC exist in the region based on Self-assessment internationally recognised principles and a Level of improvement in by JO and CO NC toolkit has been developed for other PICs judicial conduct. user surveys. to develop/revise codes. The toolkit is No CoJCs exist in the currently being piloted in one PIC. region based on and fourPEC, three CJs and two Improvements in: Improvements in judicial conducts are adapted from Continued improvements NC meetings held, judicial conduct and Meeting reports being assessed in 3 PICs; the results will internationally Greater judicial in standards of judicial perceptions of quality of MSC leadership; and and feedback. be presented to the PEC by June 2013. recognised principles. ownership of leadership, integrity, engagement by key local management No PIC driven or professional programme management stakeholders. and implementation PIC driven and regionally coordinated regionally coordinated development andimplementation of of judicial options to institutionalise judicial options exist to enable across the region. local judicial development development All approved Responsive development have been developed and ongoing judicial activities. activities in up to Fund activities achieve their endorsed by the PEC. The MSC has development regionally NC reports and four PICs. objectives; are implemented analysed its experience implementing the or lead/implement MSC NC/MSC on time and within budget PJDP and produced a lessons learned activities locally. confirmation. with minimal assistance from report which has been approved by the the PJDP Team. PEC.
The MSC ensures that this initiative does not duplicate the work of other initiatives (eg RRRT). In its approach to implementation, the MSC will explore the possibility of adapting resources developed by other initiatives where appropriate rather than re-inventing the wheel to ensure cost-effectiveness and value for money. 2.0 Governance Greater judicial ownership of professional development across the region. Improvements in: judicial conduct and leadership; and local management and implementation of judicial development activities in up to four PICs. No CoJCs exist in the region based on and adapted from internationally recognised principles. No PIC driven or regionally coordinated options exist to enable ongoing judicial development regionally or lead/implement activities locally. Three CoJC exist in the region based on internationally recognised principles and a toolkit has been developed for other PICs to develop/revise codes. The toolkit is currently being piloted in one PIC. Improvements in judicial conducts are being assessed in 3 PICs; the results will be presented to the PEC by June 2013. PIC driven and regionally coordinated options to institutionalise judicial development have been developed and endorsed by the PEC. The MSC has analysed its experience implementing the PJDP and produced a lessons learned report which has been approved by the PEC. Continued improvements in standards of judicial leadership, integrity, programme management andimplementation of local judicial development activities. Level of improvement in judicial conduct. Self-assessment by JO and CO user surveys. NC fourPEC, three CJs and two NC meetings held, perceptions of quality of engagement by key stakeholders. Meeting reports and feedback. MSC All approved Responsive Fund activities achieve their objectives; are implemented on time and within budget with minimal assistance from the PJDP Team. NC reports and MSC confirmation. NC/MSC
PJDP-24month-ext-2013-2015.docx