Table 5.6 Geotechnical Results of DM Samples in Indiana Harbor Atterberg Limits Compaction Consolidated-Undrained (CU) Unconsolidated-Undrained (UU) Moisture Hydraulic Opt. Max. Total Geotechnical Specific Total Effective Effective Content Conductivity Water Dry Friction Cohesion Friction Angle Properties Gravity LL (%) PI (%) Cohesion Cohesion Angle (%) (cm/sec) Content Density Angle (psf) (deg.) (psf) (psf) (deg.) (%) (pcf) (deg.) Average 42 19.3 32.5 2.70 18.8 103.0 2.06E-07 104.9 25.7 63.7 36.5 1036.7 14.8 Maximum 48 24 42.6 2.71 19.3 108.7 4.82E-07 147.4 29.4 111 36.5 1124 23.7 Minimum 36 17 17.9 2.69 18 99 6.14E-08 24.2 20.9 15.2 36.4 968 0 Number of Samples 3
Table 5.6 Geotechnical Results of DM Samples in Indiana Harbor Geotechnical Properties Atterberg Limits Moisture Content (%) Specific Gravity Compaction Hydraulic Conductivity (cm/sec) Consolidated-Undrained (CU) Unconsolidated-Undrained (UU) LL (%) PI (%) Opt. Water Content (%) Max. Dry Density (pcf) Total Cohesion (psf) Total Friction Angle (deg.) Effective Cohesion (psf) Effective Angle (deg.) Cohesion (psf) Friction Angle (deg.) Average 42 19.3 32.5 2.70 18.8 103.0 2.06E-07 104.9 25.7 63.7 36.5 1036.7 14.8 Maximum 48 24 42.6 2.71 19.3 108.7 4.82E-07 147.4 29.4 111 36.5 1124 23.7 Minimum 36 17 17.9 2.69 18 99 6.14E-08 24.2 20.9 15.2 36.4 968 0 Number of Samples 3
Hua-Yu_MS-Thesis.docx