Acknowledgements I am indebted to Krisztián Pete for useful discussions leading to this paper. Its first version was presented at the Oxford Hume Forum in April 2017. I am grateful to Dan O’Brien and Lorenzo Greco for the invitation, and to the audience, especially Don Garrett, Peter Millican and Eric Schliesser for helpful comments and discussion. My work has been supported by the MTA BTK and Science” Lendület Project. “Morals Hume’s T A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. by David Fate Norton, Marthe Norton, Oxford: – Clarendon, 2007. Enquiry An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, ed. by Tom Beauchamp, Oxford: – Clarendon, 2000. Secondary literature Allison, Henry, 2008, Custom and Reason in Hume: A Kantian Reading of the First Book of the Treatise, Oxford: OUP. Badici, Emil, 2011, of Equality and Hume’s View of Geometry”, Pacific “Standards Philosophical Quarterly 92, 448-467. Beebee, Helen, 2011, Two Definitions: The Procedural Interpretation”, Hume “Hume’s Studies 37, 243-274. Bloor, David, 1997, Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions, London: Routledge. Boehm, Miren, 2016, Foundational Project in the Treatise”, European Journal of “Hume’s Philosophy 24, 55-77. Buckle, Stephen, 2002, Hume’s Enlightenment Oxford: OUP. Rachel, 2008, Hume’s Morality: Feeling and Fabrication, Oxford: OUP. Coleman, Dorothy, 1979, Mathematics for Hume Synthetic a Priori?”, The Southwestern “Is Journal of Philosophy 10, 113–126. Demeter, Tamás & Láng, Benedek & Schmal, Dániel, 2015, in Marco Sgarbi (ed.), “Scientia” Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy, Cham: Springer, DOI Demeter, Tamás, 2016, David Hume and the Culture of Scottish Newtonianism: Methodology and Ideology in Enlightenment Inquiry, Leiden: Brill.
Acknowledgements I am indebted to Krisztián Pete for useful discussions leading to this paper. Its first version was presented at the Oxford Hume Forum in April 2017. I am grateful to Dan O’Brien and Lorenzo Greco for the invitation, and to the audience, especially Don Garrett, Peter Millican and Eric Schliesser for helpful comments and discussion. My work has been supported by the MTA BTK “Morals and Science” Lendület Project. Hume’s T – A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. by David Fate Norton, Marthe Norton, Oxford: Clarendon, 2007. Enquiry – An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, ed. by Tom Beauchamp, Oxford: Clarendon, 2000. Secondary literature Allison, Henry, 2008, Custom and Reason in Hume: A Kantian Reading of the First Book of the Treatise, Oxford: OUP. Badici, Emil, 2011, “Standards of Equality and Hume’s View of Geometry”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92, 448-467. Beebee, Helen, 2011, “Hume’s Two Definitions: The Procedural Interpretation”, Hume Studies 37, 243-274. Bloor, David, 1997, Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions, London: Routledge. Boehm, Miren, 2016, “Hume’s Foundational Project in the Treatise”, European Journal of Philosophy 24, 55-77. Buckle, Stephen, 2002, Hume’s Enlightenment Oxford: OUP. Rachel, 2008, Hume’s Morality: Feeling and Fabrication, Oxford: OUP. Coleman, Dorothy, 1979, “Is Mathematics for Hume Synthetic a Priori?”, The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10, 113–126. Demeter, Tamás & Láng, Benedek & Schmal, Dániel, 2015, “Scientia” in Marco Sgarbi (ed.), Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy, Cham: Springer, DOI Demeter, Tamás, 2016, David Hume and the Culture of Scottish Newtonianism: Methodology and Ideology in Enlightenment Inquiry, Leiden: Brill.
HSCMKfinal.docx