training activities. Programme Purpose: To support PICs to enhance the professional competence of judicial officers and court officers, and the processes and systems that they use. Quality/perceptions of PICs have: no benefit of: common set of 1. PIC court coordinating indicators to assess with informal justice court performance or systems. performance 2. Communication and enhancement models PICs are sharing of experience with to transpose, no Pilot PICs are, with some Pilot PICs are independently PICs have tools and other PICs through PJDP regional governance assistance, implementing and developing, implementing tools methodologies to activities. Stakeholders' mechanisms to practicing the use of tools and implementing or and methodologies continue 3. Judicial conduct surveys / institutionalise judicial methodologies, and independent practising the use of for continued improvement and structures. interviews MSC development or implementation of these tools is tools and with preliminary results 4. Performance monitoring conducted by manage internal yet to be realised. methodologies to results shared are presented to the and programming actions NCs. governance / ethics, continue between the region's PEC. to improve performance. an unquantified improvement efforts. Chief Justices. 5. Case process number of and marginalised documentation of process. prospective court 6. Planning and delivery by users and a local actors of needs-based significant number of training and provision of lay judicial officers. resources. 1.0 Access to Justice Up to two PICs better Preliminary results Inadequate data Access to Justice Number and quality of Access to Justice addressing broader in at least one PIC about informal justice Plan developed in Access to Justice Plans; TA Four PICs have been recipients Plan. justice needs, and up about: strengthened service providers selected PICs (based quality of toolkit and of workshops and/or monitoring
training activities. Programme Purpose: To support PICs to enhance the professional competence of judicial officers and court officers, and the processes and systems that they use. PICs are independently implementing tools and methodologies for continued with results shared between the region's Chief Justices. PICs have tools and methodologies to continue and preliminary results are presented to the PEC. PICs have: no common set of indicators to assess court performance or performance enhancement models to transpose, no regional governance mechanisms to institutionalise judicial development or manage internal governance / ethics, an unquantified number of marginalised prospective court users and a significant number of lay judicial officers. Pilot PICs are, with some assistance, implementing and practicing the use of tools and methodologies, and independent implementation of these tools is yet to be realised. Pilot PICs are developing, implementing or practising the use of tools and methodologies to continue efforts. Quality/perceptions of benefit of: 1. PIC court coordinating with informal justice systems. 2. Communication and sharing of experience with other PICs through PJDP activities. 3. Judicial conduct structures. 4. Performance monitoring and programming actions to improve performance. 5. Case process and documentation of process. 6. Planning and delivery by local actors of needs-based training and provision of resources. Stakeholders' surveys / interviews conducted by NCs. MSC 1.0 Access to Justice Up to two PICs better addressing broader justice needs, and up Preliminary results in at least one PIC about: strengthened Inadequate data about informal justice service providers Four PICs have been recipients of workshops and/or monitoring Access to Justice Plan developed in selected PICs (based Number and quality of Access to Justice Plans; quality of toolkit and Access to Justice Plan. TA improvement improvement
PJDP-6-monthly-progress-report.docx