Q2 OSCE and block 114.6 (95% CI 105.9 (95% CI p=0.02 109.2 to 120.1) 101.3 to 110.6) P3 OSCE and block 115.8 (95% CI 116.9 (95% CI NS 110.0 to 121.6) 112.2 to 121.6) Q4 OSCE and block 123.9 (95% CI 125.8 (95% CI NS 120.0 to 127.8) 121.8 to 129.8) Johnson(Johnston & Boohan 2000) 2000 Total OSCE score 72 students in 90 in teaching 143 (135±155), Teaching hospital p = 0.320 GP hospitals 146 (135±157), district general hospital: 144 (125±149) * Students were taught for their first five weeks of blocks 1 and 2 either in general practice or in hospital 225 students rotated through the block - all of them took at least one of the two OSCEs, and 208 students (92%) took both OSCEs. NS= p for difference not significant Figure 6 - OSCE results comparing general practice against hospital placements
Q2 OSCE and block 114.6 (95% CI 109.2 to 120.1) 105.9 (95% CI 101.3 to 110.6) p=0.02 P3 OSCE and block 115.8 (95% CI 110.0 to 121.6) 116.9 (95% CI 112.2 to 121.6) NS Q4 OSCE and block 123.9 (95% CI 120.0 to 127.8) 125.8 (95% CI 121.8 to 129.8) NS Johnson(Johnston & Boohan 2000) 2000 Total OSCE score 72 students in GP 90 in teaching hospitals 143 (135±155), Teaching hospital 146 (135±157), district general hospital: 144 (125±149) p = 0.320 * Students were taught for their first five weeks of blocks 1 and 2 either in general practice or in hospital 225 students rotated through the block - all of them took at least one of the two OSCEs, and 208 students (92%) took both OSCEs. NS= p for difference not significant Figure 6 - OSCE results comparing general practice against hospital placements
humberto-e-plinio.docx