Table 8.3 List of transboundary and border rivers that should be taken into account in annual and periodical PLC reporting: River Transboundary/ CP to provide Total catchment and Monitoring station in CP and Expected available Other comments name border river information and proportion of what is monitored information in between which involved CP catchment in involved upstream country(ies) CP’s/countries countries Narva Border and EE (own Total area: 58,126 km2 EE: LV: RU to contact LV or to decide (GUF): transboundary catchment) and whether to take on LV input as EE: 30.2 % 2 hydrochemical stations (7 km No hydrochemical river RU (LV and RU part of RU inputs. from mouth and outflow from surveillance monitoring catchment) LV:6.3 % Peipsi), stations with annual No reporting/quantification of measurements; Belarussian inputs expected RU: 63.0 % LV to RU; EE and 2 hydrological stations (20 km RU, BY from mouth outflow from Peipsi 1 hydrological – flow BY: 0.5% ) monitoring station (Zilupe – Pasiene) RU: chemical monitoring station -12 km from mouth; hydrological - 16 km Torne älv Border river SE Total area: SE: Chemical station at Mattila It is agreed that 55 % of the inputs (BOB) between SE and (approx. 7 km from outlet). of N and P entering the sea via the 40,112 km2 FI Hydrological station at river is from SE and the remaining Kukkolankoski (approx. 20 km 45 % from FI. Sweden report the SE: 63.9 % from outlet) total inputs. Sweden includes FI: 35.0 % Norwegian inputs in their net Fi: inputs NO: 1.2 % Gauja Transboundary LV Total area: LV: EE: (GUR) river 8,950 km2 1 hydrochemical surveillance MS 1 hydrological station EE/LV (Gauja, 2.0 km below Carnikava, and 1 hydrochemical LV: 87.5 % mouth); station (river Mustjõgi, 4 km from LV border) EE: 12.5 % 1 hydrological – flow MS (Gauja – Sigulda)
Table 8.3 List of transboundary and border rivers that should be taken into account in annual and periodical PLC reporting: River name Transboundary/ border river between which CP’s/countries CP to provide information and involved CP Total catchment and proportion of catchment in involved countries Monitoring station in CP and what is monitored Expected available information in upstream country(ies) Other comments Narva (GUF): Border and transboundary river LV to RU; EE and RU, BY EE (own catchment) and RU (LV and RU catchment) Total area: 58,126 km2 EE: 30.2 % LV:6.3 % RU: 63.0 % BY: 0.5% EE: 2 hydrochemical stations (7 km from mouth and outflow from Peipsi), 2 hydrological stations (20 km from mouth outflow from Peipsi ) RU: chemical monitoring station -12 km from mouth; hydrological - 16 km LV: No hydrochemical surveillance monitoring stations with annual measurements; 1 hydrological – flow monitoring station (Zilupe – Pasiene) RU to contact LV or to decide whether to take on LV input as part of RU inputs. No reporting/quantification of Belarussian inputs expected Torne älv (BOB) Border river between SE and FI SE Total area: 40,112 km2 SE: 63.9 % FI: 35.0 % NO: 1.2 % SE: Chemical station at Mattila (approx. 7 km from outlet). Hydrological station at Kukkolankoski (approx. 20 km from outlet) Fi: It is agreed that 55 % of the inputs of N and P entering the sea via the river is from SE and the remaining 45 % from FI. Sweden report the total inputs. Sweden includes Norwegian inputs in their net inputs Gauja (GUR) Transboundary river EE/LV LV Total area: 8,950 km2 LV: 87.5 % EE: 12.5 % LV: 1 hydrochemical surveillance MS (Gauja, 2.0 km below Carnikava, mouth); 1 hydrological – flow MS (Gauja – Sigulda) EE: 1 hydrological station and 1 hydrochemical station (river Mustjõgi, 4 km from LV border)
PLC%20Guidelines_13sept18.docx