If PCS-Tender is being used, the Procurement Officer should input the weightings in relation to the specified criteria. Please note that all sections should add up to 100 and all questions within each section should also add up to 100. An example of scoring methodology provided below should be used when utilising PCS-Tender: Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate an ability to 0 Unacceptable meet the requirement. Response is partially relevant and poor. The response addresses some elements of the requirement but contains 25 Poor insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate how the requirement will be fulfilled. Response is relevant and acceptable. The response addresses 50 Acceptable a broad understanding of the requirement but may lack details on how the requirement will be fulfilled in certain areas. Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently 75 Good detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides details on how the requirements will be fulfilled. Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates a 100 Excellent thorough understanding of the requirement and provides details of how the requirement will be met in full. If the Procurement Officer is not utilising PCS-Tender for their procurement, an example of scoring methodology provided below and should be used in conjunction with the : this can be tailored to suit the specific requirements of your procurement exercise. Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate an ability to meet 0 Unacceptable the requirement. Response is partially relevant and poor. The response addresses some elements of the requirement but contains insufficient/limited 1 Poor detail or explanation to demonstrate how the requirement will be fulfilled. Response is relevant and acceptable. The response addresses a 2 Acceptable broad understanding of the requirement but may lack details on how the requirement will be fulfilled in certain areas. Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently 3 Good detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides details on how the requirements will be fulfilled. Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates a 4 Excellent thorough understanding of the requirement and provides details of how the requirement will be met in full. Any documents you need are listed below: (file type: xlsm)
If PCS-Tender is being used, the Procurement Officer should input the weightings in relation to the specified criteria. Please note that all sections should add up to 100 and all questions within each section should also add up to 100. An example of scoring methodology provided below should be used when utilising PCS-Tender: 0 Unacceptable Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate an ability to meet the requirement. 25 Poor Response is partially relevant and poor. The response addresses some elements of the requirement but contains insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate how the requirement will be fulfilled. 50 Acceptable Response is relevant and acceptable. The response addresses a broad understanding of the requirement but may lack details on how the requirement will be fulfilled in certain areas. 75 Good Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides details on how the requirements will be fulfilled. 100 Excellent Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the requirement and provides details of how the requirement will be met in full. If the Procurement Officer is not utilising PCS-Tender for their procurement, an example of scoring methodology provided below and should be used in conjunction with the : this can be tailored to suit the specific requirements of your procurement exercise. 0 Unacceptable Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate an ability to meet the requirement. 1 Poor Response is partially relevant and poor. The response addresses some elements of the requirement but contains insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate how the requirement will be fulfilled. 2 Acceptable Response is relevant and acceptable. The response addresses a broad understanding of the requirement but may lack details on how the requirement will be fulfilled in certain areas. 3 Good Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides details on how the requirements will be fulfilled. 4 Excellent Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the requirement and provides details of how the requirement will be met in full. Any documents you need are listed below: (file type: xlsm)
PJ%20Route%202%20Live%20back%20up.docx