Stakeholder interviews: To Describe road understand DGH approach to maintenance road maintenance arrangements The degree to which EINRIP supported As per question S1 above. capacity-building measures remain relevant and in use Do EINRIP represent The extent to the planned and actual Document review: Examine Categorise roads value for money? Taking benefits from EINRIP roads exceed costs feasibility study and 2015 according to net into account any increases of costs and benefits Present value & in traffic volumes, have the benefit-cost ratio Document review: Identify additional costs associated Total EINRIP costs including both loan project cost Apportion grant with project preparation and grant elements costs to roads Stakeholder interviews and and higher quality Road construction cost data for document reviews: Identify Compare EINRIP standards been effectively roads typical road construction cost in costs against offset against levels of Indonesia Indonesian norms required maintenance expenditure and other Update economic Data on maintenance expenditure, economic benefits (e.g. evaluation vehicle operating travel times, reduced vehicle operating accident rates cost)? (VFM3) The extent to which the EINRIP approach As per S1 above influenced the construction/upgrading of other roads Cross cutting issues: Did ENRIP road packages take adequate account of cross-cutting issues? Evaluation question / sub Evidence required Data collection method and Analytical question source approach Main question Did the design and Whether the needs Document of women review: were To assess the Synthesise implementation of EINRIP taken into account consideration explicitly of or gender implicitly issues in treatment of take adequate account of planning and reporting (social gender issues The extent to which the strategy needs of women as road safeguards plan, loan agreement, faithfully implemented users and facilitate their M&E manual, social surveys, annual reports, AQC reports)
Stakeholder interviews: To understand DGH approach to road maintenance Describe road maintenance arrangements The degree to which EINRIP supported capacity-building measures remain relevant and in use As per question S1 above. Do EINRIP represent value for money? Taking into account any increases in traffic volumes, have the additional costs associated with project preparation and higher quality standards been effectively offset against levels of required maintenance expenditure and other economic benefits (e.g. reduced vehicle operating cost)? (VFM3) The extent to the planned and actual benefits from EINRIP roads exceed costs Document review: Examine feasibility study and 2015 of costs and benefits Document review: Identify project cost Stakeholder interviews and document reviews: Identify typical road construction cost in Indonesia Categorise roads according to net Present value & benefit-cost ratio Apportion grant costs to roads Compare EINRIP costs against Indonesian norms Update economic evaluation Total EINRIP costs including both loan and grant elements Road construction cost data for roads Data on maintenance expenditure, vehicle operating travel times, accident rates The extent to which the EINRIP approach influenced the construction/upgrading of other roads As per S1 above Cross cutting issues: Did ENRIP road packages take adequate account of cross-cutting issues? Evaluation question / sub question Evidence required Data collection method and source Analytical approach Main question Did the design and implementation of EINRIP take adequate account of needs of women as road users and facilitate their Whether the needs of women were taken into account explicitly or implicitly The extent to which the strategy faithfully implemented Document review: To assess the consideration of gender issues in planning and reporting (social safeguards plan, loan agreement, M&E manual, social surveys, annual reports, AQC reports) Synthesise treatment of gender issues
investing-in-roads-einrip-completion-evaluation-report.docx