TOTAL 70 Benchmark is 35/70 0-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 How well does the The applicant has The applicant has The project The applicant has applicant’s project/activity/programme provided very little/no provided evidence to will effectively support provided a detailed meet local needs and evidence to demonstrate how the the delivery of one or explanation as to how the priorities, is there evidence of demonstrate how it project or activity will more of the area project will deliver a local this need? will support the deliver the Local Area priorities. The priority. The application board’s priorities identified by Board priorities. The proposal is based on includes details as to how the Local Area Board. applicant has provided a robust evidence the impact will be information as to how base and includes a measured and assessed the project will be comprehensive both in economic terms evaluated. evaluation matrix. and in terms of social impact. How well does the The applicant has The applicant has There is a strong link The applicant has project/activity/programme provided very little/no provided evidence as between one or more provided a detailed meet the priorities indentified evidence to to how the project will of the priorities summary as to how the in the Joint Strategic Needs demonstrate how it support a JSNA identified in the local project will deliver JSNA Assessment (JSNA) will support the priority. The applicant JSNA and the impact priorities. The applicant priorities identified by has provided limited of the applicants has considered the wider the local JSNA. evidence to project. There is impact of the project in demonstrate how the evidence that the the context of the project will impact on project will deliver a priorities identified in the achieving a JSNA JSNA objective and funding guidance. The priority. that the success of the applicant has provided project will be evidence that the project effectively measured. will be comprehensively and effectively reviewed and the impact of the investment will be measured. There is no or very Older peoples/carers There is evidence that Older people/carers are How well have older people little evidence that views have been the applicant has leading the design, and their carers been involved in the development older people/carers taken into account engaged older people delivery and review of this
TOTAL Benchmark is 35/70 70 0-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 How well does the project/activity/programme meet local needs and priorities, is there evidence of this need? The applicant has provided very little/no evidence to demonstrate how it will support the priorities identified by the Local Area Board. The applicant has provided evidence to demonstrate how the project or activity will deliver the Local Area Board priorities. The applicant has provided information as to how the project will be evaluated. The applicant’s project will effectively support the delivery of one or more of the area board’s priorities. The proposal is based on a robust evidence base and includes a comprehensive evaluation matrix. The applicant has provided a detailed explanation as to how the project will deliver a local priority. The application includes details as to how the impact will be measured and assessed both in economic terms and in terms of social impact. How well does the project/activity/programme meet the priorities indentified in the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) The applicant has provided very little/no evidence to demonstrate how it will support the priorities identified by the local JSNA. The applicant has provided evidence as to how the project will support a JSNA priority. The applicant has provided limited evidence to demonstrate how the project will impact on achieving a JSNA priority. There is a strong link between one or more of the priorities identified in the local JSNA and the impact of the applicants project. There is evidence that the project will deliver a JSNA objective and that the success of the project will be effectively measured. The applicant has provided a detailed summary as to how the project will deliver JSNA priorities. The applicant has considered the wider impact of the project in the context of the priorities identified in the funding guidance. The applicant has provided evidence that the project will be comprehensively and effectively reviewed and the impact of the investment will be measured. How well have older people and their carers been involved in the development There is no or very little evidence that older people/carers Older peoples/carers views have been taken into account There is evidence that the applicant has engaged older people Older people/carers are leading the design, delivery and review of this
hwg-spending-guidelines-2.docx