In year two, the performance report should take the following form: 1a Performance Measure Quantitative Data Award financial aid to 100 Target Actual Performance Data percent of students. Ratio Ratio Raw Raw % % / / Y1 Y2 100/100 100% 85/100 85% Y3 Y4 Y5 Note: Target and Actual Performance Data can be reported as either or not “Raw Number” “Target Ratio” (does have to be both) depending on how the objective was proposed in the original application during the grant competition process. Performance measure in APR should be consistent with the original application. Here is an example of the same objective written as a raw number measure for a project funded to serve 100 students, and provided financial aid to only 85 students in Year 2: 1a Performance Measure Quantitative Data Award financial aid to 100 Target Actual Performance Data percent of students. Ratio Ratio Raw Raw % % Number / / Y1 Y2 100 85 Y3 Y4 Y5
In year two, the performance report should take the following form: 1a Performance Measure Quantitative Data Award financial aid to 100 percent of students. Target Actual Performance Data Raw Ratio % Raw Ratio % / / Y1 Y2 100/100 100% 85/100 85% Y3 Y4 Y5 Note: Target and Actual Performance Data can be reported as either “Raw Number” or “Target Ratio” (does not have to be both) depending on how the objective was proposed in the original application during the grant competition process. Performance measure in APR should be consistent with the original application. Here is an example of the same objective written as a raw number measure for a project funded to serve 100 students, and provided financial aid to only 85 students in Year 2: 1a Performance Measure Quantitative Data Award financial aid to 100 percent of students. Target Actual Performance Data Raw Ratio % Raw Number Ratio % / / Y1 Y2 100 85 Y3 Y4 Y5
hep-instruction-interim-apr-2017.docx