Annex 3: Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (including Logical Framework) Source: training materials of the Peruvian International Cooperation Agency (APCI). Monitoring and Evaluation Plan. The project manager will have an knowledge production process. The knowledge will be based on: Information produced by follow-up which will make it possible to take better monitoring decisions. Information from the base-line (initial evaluation of project indicators) and a mid-term evaluation, for identifying gaps and hence making adjustments towards the end of the project. The lessons learned from which will be implemented from the Prospective Systematization, start of the project. The research hypotheses arising from the implementation phases, which can provide new information for public sector policies (mining, hydrocarbons) and government action for preventing and transforming socio-environmental conflict. Information from the Final Project Evaluation, which will provide factors for replication and for advocacy. Table. Basic Definitions of Project Follow-up and Evaluation Follow-up Evaluation Management process/tool for to Process / tool for: development project management, geared Determining the effects and impacts to: (expected and unexpected) on project Verifying the proper implementation of implementation, as an analysis of the programmed activities and their factors that potentiated or limited the products. changes. Verifying the efficient use of the Verifying the achievement of expected resources disbursed for implementing outcomes at the end of the project. activities human, material and Verifying compliance with the hierarchy monetary). of objectives in the logical framework.
Annex 3: Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (including Logical Framework) Source: training materials of the Peruvian International Cooperation Agency (APCI). Monitoring and Evaluation Plan. The project manager will have an knowledge production process. The knowledge will be based on: Information produced by follow-up which will make it possible to take better monitoring decisions. Information from the base-line (initial evaluation of project indicators) and a mid-term evaluation, for identifying gaps and hence making adjustments towards the end of the project. The lessons learned from Prospective Systematization, which will be implemented from the start of the project. The research hypotheses arising from the implementation phases, which can provide new information for public sector policies (mining, hydrocarbons) and government action for preventing and transforming socio-environmental conflict. Information from the Final Project Evaluation, which will provide factors for replication and for advocacy. Table. Basic Definitions of Project Follow-up and Evaluation Follow-up Evaluation Management process/tool for to development project management, geared to: Verifying the proper implementation of programmed activities and their products. Verifying the efficient use of the resources disbursed for implementing activities human, material and monetary). Process / tool for: Determining the effects and impacts (expected and unexpected) on project implementation, as an analysis of the factors that potentiated or limited the changes. Verifying the achievement of expected outcomes at the end of the project. Verifying compliance with the hierarchy of objectives in the logical framework.
Peru_-_CARE_-_TECHNICAL-_APS-OAA-12-000001_(2).docx