outcomes, methods of assessment as well as staffing. 5.4 Review is informed by developments in Effective reviews should be informed by information Review documentation OHS and education, identified to from a broad range of sources both inside and outside Member list of Program Advisory the program, student achievement data, the university. Committee and sample minutes with student and staff feedback, changing attendees included needs of students, developments in OHS Student surveys and in education. 5.5 Review process includes input by past and present students. 5.6 Regular course review includes evidence Collated student surveys/feedback of response to student feedback and sheets lecturer reflection on the delivery of the individual courses. 5.7 Formal processes and structures are in Formal arrangements will usually include a course Review documentation place for regular oversight and input by advisory committee which should include external Member list of Program Advisory OHS professionals and industry. Such industry and professional representatives. Committee and sample minutes with arrangements should be designed so attendees included that the industry and professional CVs of OHS professional and advisors have some familiarity with the industry representatives on course program and their input is timed to advisory committee inform university approval processes. 5.4 Delivery with 5.8 Where work placements are part of the work-placements occur they should be formally Course outlines other parties program documented policies and structured with clear learning outcomes and specific Work-placement policy procedures ensure student safety, activities reflecting the learning outcomes and defined Work-placement/third party quality of student experience and supervision arrangements. agreement contribution to student learning Feedback forms from student and outcomes. workplace supervisors 6 Governance and accountability 6.1 Corporate governance
outcomes, methods of assessment as well as staffing. 5.4 Review is informed by developments in OHS and education, identified to the program, student achievement data, student and staff feedback, changing needs of students, developments in OHS and in education. Effective reviews should be informed by information from a broad range of sources both inside and outside the university. Review documentation Member list of Program Advisory Committee and sample minutes with attendees included Student surveys 5.5 Review process includes input by past and present students. 5.6 Regular course review includes evidence of response to student feedback and lecturer reflection on the delivery of the individual courses. Collated student surveys/feedback sheets 5.7 Formal processes and structures are in place for regular oversight and input by OHS professionals and industry. Such arrangements should be designed so that the industry and professional advisors have some familiarity with the program and their input is timed to inform university approval processes. Formal arrangements will usually include a course advisory committee which should include external industry and professional representatives. Review documentation Member list of Program Advisory Committee and sample minutes with attendees included CVs of OHS professional and industry representatives on course advisory committee 5.4 Delivery with other parties 5.8 Where work placements are part of the program documented policies and procedures ensure student safety, quality of student experience and contribution to student learning outcomes. work-placements occur they should be formally structured with clear learning outcomes and specific activities reflecting the learning outcomes and defined supervision arrangements. Course outlines Work-placement policy Work-placement/third party agreement Feedback forms from student and workplace supervisors 6 Governance and accountability 6.1 Corporate governance
Information-for-Universities-Applying-for-Accreditation-or-Re-accreditation-of-Programs-for-Education-of-Generalist-OHS-Professionals.docx