Baltimore Agenda Meeting in Sept. Meeting on Tuesday at Q4 gaps between various registries, creating story boards. Invited some of the vendors to provide insight Should we invite PEW and PCPI? Maybe NQ is group under all professional registries. invite them. Chrystal’s view: definitely Worth reaching out to CMS? Might be helpful to get their perspective. being planned for Physicians Sunday afternoon and all day MondayPurpose: to engage clinicians, provide info about HL7, and to find out what they need from HL7. Hopefully CIMOs will be attending Clinician meeting. Many WG will talk about what they are working on. If interested, Anita will get more info ACTION: White Paper Almost finished. About 8 pages, several contributors, led by Seth . Gap now: Waiting for work ERHQ guide. AbdulMalik’s – This will be sent out for ballot as an Informative Standard. Not yet know when it will be ballot. Could be used as a WG document and a true White Paper Goal of paper: to introduce registry requirements to a more technical audience. Alternative to Ballot: If WG has community reaches beyond HL7 one way is to circulate – within the community outside HL7 and issued as White paper meaning that it is a product of WG, not all of HL7 and then it to go through ballot cycle. doesn’t have Suggestion: Post to CIC Listserve and ask for review and comment before finalized. Also consider other groups to review i.e. Pt. Care Group – ACTION: Anita will f/u with AbdulMalik to see status of DAM ACTION: Reach out to PEW to see if they are interested in attending Next Meeting Wednesday, August 10 @ 9am (ET) – Submitted by: Claire Miller July 13, 2016
Baltimore Agenda Meeting in Sept. Meeting on Tuesday at Q4 gaps between various registries, creating story boards. Invited some of the vendors to provide insight Should we invite PEW and PCPI? Maybe NQ is group under all professional registries. Chrystal’s view: definitely invite them. Worth reaching out to CMS? Might be helpful to get their perspective. being planned for Physicians Sunday afternoon and all day MondayPurpose: to engage clinicians, provide info about HL7, and to find out what they need from HL7. Hopefully CIMOs will be attending Clinician meeting. Many WG will talk about what they are working on. ACTION: If interested, Anita will get more info White Paper Almost finished. About 8 pages, several contributors, led by Seth . Gap now: Waiting for AbdulMalik’s work – ERHQ guide. This will be sent out for ballot as an Informative Standard. Not yet know when it will be ballot. Could be used as a WG document and a true White Paper Goal of paper: to introduce registry requirements to a more technical audience. Alternative to Ballot: If WG has community reaches beyond HL7 – one way is to circulate within the community outside HL7 and issued as White paper meaning that it is a product of WG, not all of HL7 and then it doesn’t have to go through ballot cycle. Suggestion: Post to CIC Listserve and ask for review and comment before finalized. Also consider other groups to review – i.e. Pt. Care Group ACTION: Anita will f/u with AbdulMalik to see status of DAM ACTION: Reach out to PEW to see if they are interested in attending Next Meeting – Wednesday, August 10 @ 9am (ET) Submitted by: Claire Miller July 13, 2016
HL7_Registry_Common_Framework_Meeting_Minutes_-_July_27_2016.docx