Appendix 4.b. HIED 7300: Higher Education in the U.S.: An Overview First Paper Evaluation Rubric Total Class Results, Fall 2013 (N=6) CATEGORY-WEIGHT Satisfactory Low Pass Fail Paper Content (75%) Introduction (5%) Thorough overview of topic Insufficient overview of topic No overview (1) (5) (0) Use of assigned readings (15%) Thorough and complete use Insufficient - incomplete use No use (0) (3) (3) Use of outside readings (10%) Thorough and complete use Insufficient - incomplete use No use (1) (4) (1) Analysis of problem, issue, or Thorough and complete analysis Insufficient – incomplete Rote description topic (15%) analysis (0) (3) (3) Individual viewpoint (voice) Clearly present Unclear in places Not present (0) (3) (3) Arguments accurately supported Accurately supported by Inaccurate – incomplete No support by literature (10%) literature support (1) (4) (1) Accuracy of arguments (10%) All arguments are accurate Some arguments are accurate Arguments are inaccurate (1) (4) (1) Clarity of arguments (5%) All arguments are clear Some arguments are clear Arguments are unclear (0) (5) (1) Balance of paper (intro, body, Excellent balance of paper Inconsistent balance of paper Poor balance of paper conclusion) sections sections sections (2) (2) (2) Conclusion (proposed solutions, Thorough conclusion Conclusion merely restates No conclusion strategies, or predictions) (5%) paper content (0) (6) (0) 3. Use of headers and subheaders Effective use Ineffective use No headers or subheaders (2) (1) (3)
Appendix 4.b. HIED 7300: Higher Education in the U.S.: An Overview First Paper Evaluation Rubric Total Class Results, Fall 2013 (N=6) CATEGORY-WEIGHT Satisfactory Low Pass Fail Paper Content (75%) Introduction (5%) Thorough overview of topic (1) Insufficient overview of topic (5) No overview (0) Use of assigned readings (15%) Thorough and complete use (0) Insufficient - incomplete use (3) No use (3) Use of outside readings (10%) Thorough and complete use (1) Insufficient - incomplete use (4) No use (1) Analysis of problem, issue, or topic (15%) Thorough and complete analysis (0) Insufficient – incomplete analysis (3) Rote description (3) Individual viewpoint (voice) Clearly present (0) Unclear in places (3) Not present (3) Arguments accurately supported by literature (10%) Accurately supported by literature (1) Inaccurate – incomplete support (4) No support (1) Accuracy of arguments (10%) All arguments are accurate (1) Some arguments are accurate (4) Arguments are inaccurate (1) Clarity of arguments (5%) All arguments are clear (0) Some arguments are clear (5) Arguments are unclear (1) Balance of paper (intro, body, conclusion) Excellent balance of paper sections (2) Inconsistent balance of paper sections (2) Poor balance of paper sections (2) Conclusion (proposed solutions, strategies, or predictions) (5%) Thorough conclusion (0) Conclusion merely restates paper content (6) No conclusion (0) 3. Use of headers and subheaders Effective use (2) Ineffective use (1) No headers or subheaders (3)
HIED-MastersProgAssessReport_2013.docx