district and the remaining Grossmont UHSD. Based on 2016–17 data and assuming the new district was effective for that year, the CDE calculates that the 2016–17 LCFF entitlements would have been $19.9 million for the new Alpine district and $153 million for the remaining Grossmont UHSD—the combined total being slightly less than 1.3 percent above the 2016–17 LCFF entitlement received by the two current districts. The actual LCFF entitlement recalculation will be based on data from one year prior to the effective year of the new district (assuming the new district is approved). Attachment(s) Attachment 1: Report of Required Conditions for Reorganization (37 pages) Attachment 2: Racial/Ethnic Report (15 pages) Attachment 3: Educational Program Report (18 pages) Attachment 4: School Facilities Analysis (7 pages) Attachment 5: Fiscal Analysis (6 Attachment 6: Data for Enrollment Trend Bar Graphs (1 page)
district and the remaining Grossmont UHSD. Based on 2016–17 data and assuming the new district was effective for that year, the CDE calculates that the 2016–17 LCFF entitlements would have been $19.9 million for the new Alpine district and $153 million for the remaining Grossmont UHSD—the combined total being slightly less than 1.3 percent above the 2016–17 LCFF entitlement received by the two current districts. The actual LCFF entitlement recalculation will be based on data from one year prior to the effective year of the new district (assuming the new district is approved). Attachment(s) Attachment 1: Report of Required Conditions for Reorganization (37 pages) Attachment 2: Racial/Ethnic Report (15 pages) Attachment 3: Educational Program Report (18 pages) Attachment 4: School Facilities Analysis (7 pages) Attachment 5: Fiscal Analysis (6 Attachment 6: Data for Enrollment Trend Bar Graphs (1 page)
jan18item21.docx