lessons sharing, users including their wetland data at the wetland PA data from investment in the upkeep and awareness usefulness. sub-system level. all the PA agencies of the platform for wetland PAs. providing necessary Assumptions: information for wetland There is a need to use the PA managers for their platform (demand). management decision making 3.2. Public and government KAP survey has 30% improvement in KAP Survey results Risks: have better understanding been commissioned KAP survey results (3 times: PPG, Weak statistical and better access to through the PPG and (i.e., a score of 173 or and Closing) significance due to low information about wetland a baseline has been 82%). response rate. issues, indicated by results measured for the Assumptions: of the KAP surveys national level project KAP survey reflects (Annex 4) in Beijing and for attitude and intention. some of the provincial projects. The baseline is a score of 111.5 of 216 in Beijing (52%). 3.3. Magnitude and No program level Programmatic Program reports at Risks: coverage of lessons system to track or monitoring system in mid-term and end of Individual sub-projects’ disseminated. disseminate lessons. place as per the the project by the implementation timing Program Framework SFA differs significantly and program level Assumptions: reporting is in place. Lessons from all projects Lessons documented can be synthesized. and shared widely. Wetland PA Program Steering and Coordination Forum established
lessons sharing, and awareness for wetland PAs. users including their usefulness. wetland data at the sub-system level. wetland PA data from all the PA agencies providing necessary information for wetland PA managers for their management decision making investment in the upkeep of the platform Assumptions: There is a need to use the platform (demand). 3.2. Public and government have better understanding and better access to information about wetland issues, indicated by results of the KAP surveys (Annex 4) KAP survey has been commissioned through the PPG and a baseline has been measured for the national level project in Beijing and for some of the provincial projects. The baseline is a score of 111.5 of 216 in Beijing (52%). 30% improvement in KAP survey results (i.e., a score of 173 or 82%). KAP Survey results (3 times: PPG, and Closing) Risks: Weak statistical significance due to low response rate. Assumptions: KAP survey reflects attitude and intention. 3.3. Magnitude and coverage of lessons disseminated. No program level system to track or disseminate lessons. Programmatic monitoring system in place as per the Program Framework and program level reporting is in place. Lessons documented and shared widely. Wetland PA Program Steering and Coordination Forum established Program reports at mid-term and end of the project by the SFA Risks: Individual sub-projects’ implementation timing differs significantly Assumptions: Lessons from all projects can be synthesized.
PIMS%25204391_MSL%2520National%2520Level%2520Project%2520PRODOC_04282013%2520for%2520resubmission_0.docx