multifamily sector. Findings of Fact: 46 & 48 (p. 405), 50 (p. 406) (regarding the importance of serving multifamily buildings, including their common areas), 80, 82 (p. 410). Conclusions of Law: 69 (p. 421) (regarding treatment of common areas in rent restricted properties), 72, 73 (p. 421) (outreach to multifamily properties), 84 (p. 423) (IOUs should draw on unspent balances to fund common area measures in multifamily buildings), 86, 87 (p. 424) (treatment and funding of common area measures), 124 (p. 429-430) on (“…focus households and buildings…”) Ordering paragraphs: 41, 42 (p. 458), 43 (p. 458-9) (funding of common area measures in multifamily buildings, subject to an $80 million cap in unspent funds), 48 (p. 460) COMMISSIONER SANDOVAL’S CONCURRENCE (12/21/16): (p. 1): Decision and “expands benefits measures . . . to the eligible population . . . including services for low-income multifamily housing customers.” (p. 2): the first time we authorize “For the deployment of measures . . . in the of certain multifamily ‘common area’ buildings. . .Treating the common areas of those buildings, in addition to the units of low-income families, will increase energy efficiency, and improve the health, comfort, and safety of low-income tenants.” 2. Strengthening & TESTIMONY Verified CLAIMANT’S enhancing use of a (4/27/15): “single point of for contact” (SPOC) Ex. 32 (Stamas), p. 30; Ex. 45 (Larson), owners of multifamily pp.7-8; Ex. 41 (Robbins), p. 2; Ex. 43 buildings wishing to access (Wells), p. 9. the ESA program (also BRIEF: referred to as CLAIMANT’S “one stop
multifamily sector. Findings of Fact: 46 & 48 (p. 405), 50 (p. 406) (regarding the importance of serving multifamily buildings, including their common areas), 80, 82 (p. 410). Conclusions of Law: 69 (p. 421) (regarding treatment of common areas in rent restricted properties), 72, 73 (p. 421) (outreach to multifamily properties), 84 (p. 423) (IOUs should draw on unspent balances to fund common area measures in multifamily buildings), 86, 87 (p. 424) (treatment and funding of common area measures), 124 (p. 429-430) (“…focus on households and buildings…”) Ordering paragraphs: 41, 42 (p. 458), 43 (p. 458-9) (funding of common area measures in multifamily buildings, subject to an $80 million cap in unspent funds), 48 (p. 460) COMMISSIONER SANDOVAL’S CONCURRENCE (12/21/16): (p. 1): Decision “expands benefits and measures . . . to the eligible population . . . including services for low-income multifamily housing customers.” (p. 2): “For the first time we authorize the deployment of measures . . . in the ‘common area’ of certain multifamily buildings. . .Treating the common areas of those buildings, in addition to the units of low-income families, will increase energy efficiency, and improve the health, comfort, and safety of low-income tenants.” 2. Strengthening & enhancing use of a “single point of contact” (SPOC) for owners of multifamily buildings wishing to access the ESA program (also referred to as “one stop CLAIMANT’S TESTIMONY (4/27/15): Ex. 32 (Stamas), p. 30; Ex. 45 (Larson), pp.7-8; Ex. 41 (Robbins), p. 2; Ex. 43 (Wells), p. 9. CLAIMANT’S BRIEF: Verified
180084975.docx