The happiness (Happy) between subjects in the treatment (mdn = 5) and control group (mdn = 5) did not differ significantly from each other in an 1-tailed setting (U = 12592, z = -0.262, p = 0.397, r = -0.015). Result 6: is no significant difference in the happiness of the students when they are in the loss framing (treatment group) compared to the students in the gain frame (control group). There are also no significant differences when comparing the treatment effects for happiness (Happy) in the proportion of subjects being cooperative (Survey=1) and the proportion of subjects stealing (Stole=1). The fun (Fun) between the subjects in the treatment (mdn = 4) and control group (mdn = 4) did not differ significantly from each other in an 1-tailed setting (U = 12381.5, z = p = 0.309, r = -0.029) Result 7: There is no significant difference in the fun the students experienced for participating in the experiment when they are in the loss framing (treatment group) compared to the students in the gain frame (control group). It subjects answered the question 'how happy are you now?' and 'how much fun did you think this experiment was?' the same, but closer inspection shows that when looking at the proportions 'Survey=0', 'Survey=1', 'Stole=0' and 'Stole=1', the subjects in the treatment group report being more happy, but think of the experiment as less fun compared to the control group. The results are not significant, but might provide some food for thought. The degree of fairness (Fair) between the subjects in the treatment group (mdn = 6) and control group (mdn = 6) did not differ significantly from each other in an 1-tailed setting (U = 12765, z = -0.043, p = 0.483, r = -0.002) Result 8: is no significant difference in the fairness experienced by the students when they are in the loss framing (treatment group) compared to the students in the gain frame (control group).
The happiness (Happy) between subjects in the treatment (mdn = 5) and control group (mdn = 5) did not differ significantly from each other in an 1-tailed setting (U = 12592, z = -0.262, p = 0.397, r = -0.015). Result 6: is no significant difference in the happiness of the students when they are in the loss framing (treatment group) compared to the students in the gain frame (control group). There are also no significant differences when comparing the treatment effects for happiness (Happy) in the proportion of subjects being cooperative (Survey=1) and the proportion of subjects stealing (Stole=1). The fun (Fun) between the subjects in the treatment (mdn = 4) and control group (mdn = 4) did not differ significantly from each other in an 1-tailed setting (U = 12381.5, z = p = 0.309, r = -0.029) Result 7: There is no significant difference in the fun the students experienced for participating in the experiment when they are in the loss framing (treatment group) compared to the students in the gain frame (control group). It subjects answered the question 'how happy are you now?' and 'how much fun did you think this experiment was?' the same, but closer inspection shows that when looking at the proportions 'Survey=0', 'Survey=1', 'Stole=0' and 'Stole=1', the subjects in the treatment group report being more happy, but think of the experiment as less fun compared to the control group. The results are not significant, but might provide some food for thought. The degree of fairness (Fair) between the subjects in the treatment group (mdn = 6) and control group (mdn = 6) did not differ significantly from each other in an 1-tailed setting (U = 12765, z = -0.043, p = 0.483, r = -0.002) Result 8: is no significant difference in the fairness experienced by the students when they are in the loss framing (treatment group) compared to the students in the gain frame (control group).
Hsu-D.docx