promoted. spaces for dialogue from leaders. the indigenous Strengthening of Social communities that have Responsibility practices. formal representation. Presence of national dialogue mechanisms in project areas (EITI) and Tripartite Dialogues on Hydrocarbons. R2: Men and women leaders of indigenous peoples in Indigenous leaders Increase in the empowerment of Percentage of male and Surveys (Baseline, the area of intervention empowered for the full effectively access and male leaders and female leaders female leaders and who mid-term, final exercise and promotion of rights and multicultural of indigenous communities. say they have full control evaluation) monitor participation multi-stakeholder dialogue. mechanisms promoted over decisions affecting Regular monitoring by the Government. their lives. reports Percentage of female leaders who say they have full control over decisions affecting their lives. Percentage of indigenous female leaders in respect of the total number of leaders. R3: Regional and Local Governments of the area Government entities, An increasingly relevant role of Number of transformed Surveys (Baseline, develop and implement mechanisms of governance including regional Regional and Local socio-environmental mid-term, final for the prevention and transformation of conflict, governments such as Governments in the prevention conflicts whose evaluation). generating lessons for public policy. and transformation of social transformation has been Loreto, San Martin Regular monitoring and Amazonas, apply conflicts. led by the Regional and reports tools and methods of Local Governments in the prevention and area. conflict resolution. Activities Component 1 1.1. Identify the context of conflict and social dynamics Periodic monitoring reports. Increased knowledge regarding Diagnosis of the context of The assumptions at the in the area of intervention. the context of conflict and the conflict and social activities level areas of intervention. dynamics developed using (operational) will be participatory methods. specified in the design phase of the project Monitoring mechanisms to baseline. detect social conflict are designed and put into practice. 1.2. Strategic analysis of the spaces and processes of Periodic monitoring reports. Decision making in the spaces of Strategic analysis of the local and regional dialogue on socio-environmental dialogue carried out based on developed spaces and conflicts around extractive activities and indigenous addressing: potentials, processes dedicated to peoples. challenges, limitations and local and regional threats. dialogue. 1.3. Development of a Participatory Action Plan for the Periodic monitoring reports. The spaces for dialogue in the Participatory plans of the management of spaces for dialogue in the areas of field of intervention guided by dialogue spaces developed
promoted. Strengthening of Social Responsibility practices. spaces for dialogue from the indigenous communities that have formal representation. Presence of national dialogue mechanisms in project areas (EITI) and Tripartite Dialogues on Hydrocarbons. leaders. R2: Men and women leaders of indigenous peoples in the area of intervention empowered for the full exercise and promotion of rights and multicultural multi-stakeholder dialogue. Increase in the empowerment of male leaders and female leaders of indigenous communities. Percentage of male and female leaders and who say they have full control over decisions affecting their lives. Percentage of female leaders who say they have full control over decisions affecting their lives. Percentage of indigenous female leaders in respect of the total number of leaders. Surveys (Baseline, mid-term, final evaluation) Regular monitoring reports Indigenous leaders effectively access and monitor participation mechanisms promoted by the Government. R3: Regional and Local Governments of the area develop and implement mechanisms of governance for the prevention and transformation of conflict, generating lessons for public policy. An increasingly relevant role of Regional and Local Governments in the prevention and transformation of social conflicts. Number of transformed socio-environmental conflicts whose transformation has been led by the Regional and Local Governments in the area. Surveys (Baseline, mid-term, final evaluation). Regular monitoring reports Government entities, including regional governments such as Loreto, San Martin and Amazonas, apply tools and methods of prevention and conflict resolution. Activities Component 1 1.1. Identify the context of conflict and social dynamics in the area of intervention. Increased knowledge regarding the context of conflict and the areas of intervention. Diagnosis of the context of conflict and social dynamics developed using participatory methods. Monitoring mechanisms to detect social conflict are designed and put into practice. Periodic monitoring reports. The assumptions at the activities level (operational) will be specified in the design phase of the project baseline. 1.2. Strategic analysis of the spaces and processes of local and regional dialogue on socio-environmental conflicts around extractive activities and indigenous peoples. Decision making in the spaces of dialogue carried out based on addressing: potentials, challenges, limitations and threats. Strategic analysis of the developed spaces and processes dedicated to local and regional dialogue. Periodic monitoring reports. 1.3. Development of a Participatory Action Plan for the management of spaces for dialogue in the areas of The spaces for dialogue in the field of intervention guided by Participatory plans of the dialogue spaces developed Periodic monitoring reports.
Peru_-_CARE_-_TECHNICAL-_APS-OAA-12-000001_(2).docx