Partner as Teaching Centre (‘delegated collaboration’ - all or most teaching and tutoring delegated to partner) 3 Control of Outcome Standards (in addition to external  examiner scrutiny) Most assessment set and marked (or second marked) by UoK 1 Assessment shared 2 Most assessment delegated to partner 3 Sub-Total = TOTAL = Overall Risk Scores 11 15 = Low – 16 21 = Medium – 22 30 = High – NOTES 1. The overall total score of any proposal will lie between 10 (min) and 30 (max), with a of thumb’ range of 11-15 regarded as risk’; 16-21 as ‘rule ‘low risk’; and 22-30 as risk’. ‘medium ‘high 2. The model’ is regarded as a particularly significant factor in the assessment of risk, so particular attention is paid to this section ‘delivery 3. checks/factors to consider: views of any local accreditation agency and/or British Council - any local legislation about collaboration - general with University/School collaborative strategy - ‘fit’ existing or potential geographical - ‘node’ existing or potential partner - any internal university issues (eg re-structuring) - host Dept’s record on quality - other latent benefits, (research/consultancy opportunities, staff development, curriculum development, contribution to community need etc) -
Partner as Teaching Centre (‘delegated collaboration’ - all or most teaching and tutoring delegated to partner) 3  Control of Outcome Standards (in addition to external examiner scrutiny) Most assessment set and marked (or second marked) by UoK 1 Assessment shared 2 Most assessment delegated to partner 3 Sub-Total = TOTAL = Overall Risk Scores 11 – 15 = Low 16 – 21 = Medium 22 – 30 = High NOTES 1. The overall total score of any proposal will lie between 10 (min) and 30 (max), with a ‘rule of thumb’ range of 11-15 regarded as ‘low risk’; 16-21 as ‘medium risk’; and 22-30 as ‘high risk’. 2. The ‘delivery model’ is regarded as a particularly significant factor in the assessment of risk, so particular attention is paid to this section 3. checks/factors to consider: - views of any local accreditation agency and/or British Council - any local legislation about collaboration - general ‘fit’ with University/School collaborative strategy - existing or potential geographical ‘node’ - existing or potential partner - any internal university issues (eg re-structuring) - host Dept’s record on quality - other latent benefits, (research/consultancy opportunities, staff development, curriculum development, contribution to community need etc)
International%20Handbook%202010-11%2022%20Sept%202011.DOCX