unemployment benefits family benefits family benefits minimum income (maternity and (maternity and paternity leave, paternity leave) family benefits (maternity ALMP) parenting services affordable housing policies health care parenting services ALPM long-term care disability service sick provisions disability service education and training Source: Own elaboration adopted from: DeDeken, 2014. Facilitators and limitations for/of implementation of Investment” approaches “Social Table 2 provides an overview of the facilitators for (and limitations of) social investment approaches. Table 2: Facilitators and limitations for/of implementation of social investments Factors Facilitators Limitations Strategy 2020”, the empirical basis for the work “Europe “Social “making Investment Package”; pay” approach remains weak (Adema et the work pay” paradigm (Aasen al., 2011); “making et al., 2015); there is an empirical evidence as well as Investment” is understood in terms references to the literature, showing that “Social of of interdependent policy receipt, duration, and generosity of “packages” initiatives across various areas benefits have no clear-cut effect (Bonoli, (Abrahamson, 2010); 2007, 2009, 2012) rights to mothers and fathers as carers and earners financial support, flexibility, – quality childcare, children’s rights to quality care and parental time, right to have democratic control and choice, Legal human rights, civil rights, right to work, right to support and an enabling environment, right to have control over support, right to financial and practical support, right to work and care, right to social inclusion, right to improved health services, right to flexible working over the life course, right to collective organization, right to residency, right to social protection, right to family reunion, right to training, right to contracted/regularised work (eg. Bonoli, 2006; Bouget et al., 2015; Crouch, 2013) social benefits serve to enable the dividing line between compensation beneficiaries to keep investing in and prevention is often not clear-cut Political themselves and their families (Crouch, (Heidenreich and Rice, 2015); 2015)
unemployment benefits minimum income family benefits (maternity and paternity leave, ALMP) parenting services long-term care disability service family benefits (maternity and paternity leave) parenting services ALPM disability service education and training family benefits (maternity affordable housing policies health care sick provisions Source: Own elaboration adopted from: DeDeken, 2014. Facilitators and limitations for/of implementation of “Social Investment” approaches Table 2 provides an overview of the facilitators for (and limitations of) social investment approaches. Table 2: Facilitators and limitations for/of implementation of social investments Factors Facilitators Limitations Legal Strategy “Europe 2020”, “Social Investment Package”; the “making work pay” paradigm (Aasen et al., 2015); “Social Investment” is understood in terms of “packages” of interdependent policy initiatives across various areas (Abrahamson, 2010); rights to mothers and fathers as carers and earners – financial support, flexibility, quality childcare, children’s rights to quality care and parental time, right to have democratic control and choice, human rights, civil rights, right to work, right to support and an enabling environment, right to have control over support, right to financial and practical support, right to work and care, right to social inclusion, right to improved health services, right to flexible working over the life course, right to collective organization, right to residency, right to social protection, right to family reunion, right to training, right to contracted/regularised work (eg. Bonoli, 2006; Bouget et al., 2015; Crouch, 2013) the empirical basis for the “making work pay” approach remains weak (Adema et al., 2011); there is an empirical evidence as well as references to the literature, showing that receipt, duration, and generosity of benefits have no clear-cut effect (Bonoli, 2007, 2009, 2012) Political social benefits serve to enable beneficiaries to keep investing in themselves and their families (Crouch, 2015) the dividing line between compensation and prevention is often not clear-cut (Heidenreich and Rice, 2015);
InnoSI-649189-D2-2.docx