Results Framework and Monitoring Project Development Objective (PDO): Responsibility Description Cumulative Target Values** Unit of Data Source/ PDO Level Results Indicators* Baseline Frequency for Data (indicator Measure Methodology YR 1 YR 2 YR3 YR 4 YR5 Collection definition etc.) Indicator One: At At least At Institutions in No Number of Government bodies, institutions and least one one Project charge of SME institutions bodies, local government units receiving 4 more more Annually Progress Report Implementation policy benefiting institutions receiving support services Team (PIT) from the activities and units support of the project Indicator Two: 3 sets Studies, assessments, reports, action of Guidelines plans, roadmaps, models of good Number of developed and Project practices or frameworks endorsed guidelines endorsed to No guidelines 0 Annually Progress Report Implementation developed (one support each are and Team (PIT) per for under each endorsed JEDCO component Indicator Three: Staff benefiting Public sector trained in various Over Project from the capacity No staff 35 aspects of SME and entrepreneurship Number of 70 100 Annually Progress Report Implementation building activities coordination, dialogue, monitoring staff trained staff Team (PIT) under each and evaluation, and data collection, component harmonisation and analysis INTERMEDIATE RESULTS Intermediate Result (Component One): Provide support and capacity building for to lead the implementation and coordination of the overall SME Strategy Intermediate Result indicator One: Consultations Qualitative indicator. Consultations between relevant actors of are sporadic, At least Number of At Relevance of the different levels (high and technical level) in not one least indicator lies in the selected, highly horizontal policy areas and one Semi-annually OECD-JEDCO form and (e.g. innovation policy, access to finance, relevant actors formal participation of the business environments, etc.). are not consultations consultations rather consistently than their number. involved Intermediate Result indicator Two: Key Number of No specific Semi-annually Qualitative indicator. shortcomings and bottlenecks identified in coordination shortcomings Relevance of the and and indicator lies on
Results Framework and Monitoring Project Development Objective (PDO): PDO Level Results Indicators* Unit of Measure Baseline Cumulative Target Values** Frequency Data Source/ Methodology Responsibility for Data Collection Description (indicator definition etc.) YR 1 YR 2 YR3 YR 4 YR5 Indicator One: Government bodies, institutions and local government units receiving support services Number of bodies, institutions and units No institutions receiving support At least 4 At least one more At one more Annually Progress Report Project Implementation Team (PIT) Institutions in charge of SME policy benefiting from the activities of the project Indicator Two: Studies, assessments, reports, action plans, roadmaps, models of good practices or frameworks endorsed Number of guidelines developed and endorsed No guidelines 0 3 sets of (one per for JEDCO Annually Progress Report Project Implementation Team (PIT) Guidelines developed and endorsed to support each are under each component Indicator Three: Public sector trained in various aspects of SME and entrepreneurship coordination, dialogue, monitoring and evaluation, and data collection, harmonisation and analysis Number of staff No staff trained 35 70 Over 100 staff Annually Progress Report Project Implementation Team (PIT) Staff benefiting from the capacity building activities under each component INTERMEDIATE RESULTS Intermediate Result (Component One): Provide support and capacity building for to lead the implementation and coordination of the overall SME Strategy Intermediate Result indicator One: Consultations between relevant actors of different levels (high and technical level) in selected, highly horizontal policy areas (e.g. innovation policy, access to finance, business environments, etc.). Number of formal consultations Consultations are sporadic, not and relevant actors are not consistently involved At least one At least one Semi-annually OECD-JEDCO Qualitative indicator. Relevance of the indicator lies in the form and participation of the consultations rather than their number. Intermediate Result indicator Two: Key shortcomings and bottlenecks identified in Number of coordination and No specific shortcomings and Semi-annually Qualitative indicator. Relevance of the indicator lies on
JO%20OECD%20SME%20Policy%20Effectiveness%20Proposal.docx