is used, it is clearly stated as e.g. could be both a "Concept" and an "INSPIRE <dcat:dataset>, followed by its properties, theme"). <dcat:dataset> refers to a however SKOS-objects are stated as a relationship (between a "dcat:Catalog" and <rdf:Description>, followed by the declaration other entities), not an entity itself. of its type, using the property rdf:type. all Figures ge When reading the document it seems like the Check if all the figure numbering matches the Updated figure reference. Figure numbering not always match the reference in the text. UK Executive ge could make the scope of resources to be Not accepted. summary included in registers more explicit by giving The executive summary and introduction and examples of the kinds of INSPIRE resources already give some examples of the resources with URIs that would not be included in a in scope. The document is deliberately open register. to including different types of resources in sections national registers and also in the INSPIRE register federation. It will be ultimately up to the national or European control bodies to accept or reject proposals for inclusions of registers. NL Foreword 5 Ed Typo: will improved improve’ Updated ‘will NL 1 1 Ed Typo reused’ > re-use’ Updated ‘should ‘should NL 1 5 Ed Missing verb the MIWP 2014-2016, an action and Reworded to "… for setting up register and ‘Within sub-group (MIWP-6) was therefore set up to registries and for publishing and accessing develop technical guidelines and best practices European, national or community registers for setting up register and registries and to and the links between them through a register work out how European, national or federation." community registers and the links between them can be published in and accessed through a register federation.’ NL 1 7 Ed Broken reference to chapter 6 Fix reference Updated NL 1 7 Ed Broken reference to annex C Fix reference Updated NL 2 Ge Ref to W3C DWBP should not reference the Either make this an undated reference, or The date has been updated (15 December editor’s draft. Editor’s drafts are just the reference the Candidate Recommendation of 2016). The document is now. W3C Proposed publicly available working version of W3C 30 August 2016. Recommendation. documents and are continually changing until the document is complete. The URL provided in the Normative Reference is the correct one,
is used, it is clearly stated as e.g. <dcat:dataset>, followed by its properties, however SKOS-objects are stated as a <rdf:Description>, followed by the declaration of its type, using the property rdf:type. could be both a "Concept" and an "INSPIRE theme"). <dcat:dataset> refers to a relationship (between a "dcat:Catalog" and other entities), not an entity itself. all Figures ge When reading the document it seems like the Figure numbering not always match the reference in the text. Check if all the figure numbering matches the figure reference. Updated UK Executive summary and sections ge could make the scope of resources to be included in registers more explicit by giving examples of the kinds of INSPIRE resources with URIs that would not be included in a register. Not accepted. The executive summary and introduction already give some examples of the resources in scope. The document is deliberately open to including different types of resources in national registers and also in the INSPIRE register federation. It will be ultimately up to the national or European control bodies to accept or reject proposals for inclusions of registers. NL Foreword 5 Ed Typo: will improved ‘will improve’ Updated NL 1 1 Ed Typo ‘should reused’ > ‘should re-use’ Updated NL 1 5 Ed Missing verb ‘Within the MIWP 2014-2016, an action and sub-group (MIWP-6) was therefore set up to develop technical guidelines and best practices for setting up register and registries and to work out how European, national or community registers and the links between them can be published in and accessed through a register federation.’ Reworded to "… for setting up register and registries and for publishing and accessing European, national or community registers and the links between them through a register federation." NL 1 7 Ed Broken reference to chapter 6 Fix reference Updated NL 1 7 Ed Broken reference to annex C Fix reference Updated NL 2 Ge Ref to W3C DWBP should not reference the editor’s draft. Editor’s drafts are just the publicly available working version of W3C documents and are continually changing until the document is complete. The URL provided in the Normative Reference is the correct one, Either make this an undated reference, or reference the Candidate Recommendation of 30 August 2016. The date has been updated (15 December 2016). The document is now. W3C Proposed Recommendation.
inspire-tg-registers-and-register-federation-mig-t-comment-resolution.docx