Marking Schedule for End of Module Report. Name Overall Mark on 20-point scale:- Student’s Name Marker’s Overall comments Qualitative indicators that guide the awarding of an overall mark. Markers are requested to shade/highlight the relevant boxes within the two grids of qualitative indicators. Fail Poor Adequate Good Excellent Outstanding 0-6 7-10 11-13 14-16 17-18 19-20 Clear description Good Excellent Outstanding Absent or of aims of the Unclear aims. Aims are stated. description of description of description of very unclear. placement. aims. aims. aims. Ability to Very little Clear Substantial Outstanding and to Limited evidence Not evidence of evidence of evidence of evidence of demonstrate of self-reflection demonstrated. or self-reflection self-reflection and during or progress. progress progress. and progress. and progress. progress. the module. Understanding of key issues A good A clear and No significant Little A satisfactory An outstanding associated with understanding excellent understanding understanding understanding of understanding communicating of the issues is understanding demonstrated. demonstrated. the issues. of the issues. and teaching clear. of the issues. school pupils. Creativity in thought, A good No significant Limited Some elements of Excellent integration of standard of Outstanding creativity or creativity or creativity and standard of material or creativity and creativity and perspective perspective perspective are creativity or perspective on perspective is perspective. demonstrated. demonstrated. apparent. perspective. educational apparent. issues. Extensive Substantial Critical Very limited Clear evidence of No evidence Limited evidence evidence of evaluation of evidence of evidence of insightful of critical of critical well-informed educational critical critical critical appraisal. appraisal. critical issue(s). appraisal. appraisal. appraisal. appraisal. /grid continued overleaf Fail Poor Adequate Good Excellent Outstanding 0-6 7-10 11-13 14-16 17-18 19-20 Logical Balanced work, Logical Excellent Disorganised structure with Organization of not always structure, structure and Very poor. work, too appropriate material. logically appropriate balance between long/short. balance structured, length. elements of the between the
Marking Schedule for End of Module Report. Student’s Name Marker’s Name Overall Mark on 20-point scale:- Overall comments Qualitative indicators that guide the awarding of an overall mark. Markers are requested to shade/highlight the relevant boxes within the two grids of qualitative indicators. Fail 0-6 Poor 7-10 Adequate 11-13 Good 14-16 Excellent 17-18 Outstanding 19-20 Clear description of aims of the placement. Absent or very unclear. Unclear aims. Aims are stated. Good description of aims. Excellent description of aims. Outstanding description of aims. Ability to and to demonstrate progress during the module. Not demonstrated. Very little evidence of or progress. Limited evidence of self-reflection or progress. Clear evidence of self-reflection and progress. Substantial evidence of self-reflection and progress. Outstanding evidence of and progress. Understanding of key issues associated with communicating and teaching school pupils. No significant understanding demonstrated. Little understanding demonstrated. A satisfactory understanding of the issues. A good understanding of the issues is clear. A clear and excellent understanding of the issues. An outstanding understanding of the issues. Creativity in thought, integration of material or perspective on educational issues. No significant creativity or perspective demonstrated. Limited creativity or perspective demonstrated. Some elements of creativity and perspective are apparent. A good standard of creativity and perspective is apparent. Excellent standard of creativity or perspective. Outstanding creativity and perspective. Critical evaluation of educational issue(s). No evidence of critical appraisal. Very limited evidence of critical appraisal. Limited evidence of critical appraisal. Clear evidence of critical appraisal. Substantial evidence of well-informed critical appraisal. Extensive evidence of insightful critical appraisal. /grid continued overleaf Fail 0-6 Poor 7-10 Adequate 11-13 Good 14-16 Excellent 17-18 Outstanding 19-20 Organization of material. Very poor. Disorganised work, too long/short. Balanced work, not always logically structured, Logical structure, appropriate length. Logical structure with appropriate balance between the Excellent structure and balance between elements of the
ID4002%20Marking%20Schedule%20for%20End%20of%20Module%20Report.docx