TL: public transport If the user comes with advocate we must cover both expenses - needs clarification CArmel: fair amount should be paid - if someone chooses something that is CV: not the mini wage London living wage TL: greater clarity on the 3 pyramids TL: headings difficult to Understand we describe in terms of principles JN: I was unclear who we referring to - very unclear on who this refers to Sonia: not unclear TL: it assumes u know what an expert advisor is JM: what are we talking about CCG may reject due to cost TL: phrased implementation GAb: I want to agree on the important of meaning of words - payment more volunteers may provide more time - add value - independent gets blurred TL: some people, wouldn't be able to attend because they couldn't afford to take part. TL: maybe called rewards JN: some people may only attend because they are paid JW: all professionals are paid it is not like attending a public meeting coproduction at the highest level means payment TL: how long do we do this for and something about accountability Update on the involvement Lay paper Description of the role when they meet and how Clarify the two headings like minded - VD to make sure Action froM RJC Action: Andrew to bring back an update Provider Board trusts in London get together GAb: 5 May digital citizen appealed to participation - it is a cutting piece of work Governance table cross cutting Action: all to send to RJC - STPS guide one pager Understand easy language detail against content 1) over view of STP the 4 projects 2) why is it better for the system 3) get the information over the next 2 4) short message - simply explain comment on its content 5) would this mean anything to people on the street 6) a number of individuals GAb, John, VD Carmel Two Task and Finsh groups 1) Diversity TL, SO 2) Feedback OF! CV! VD SO: National audit office review on STP - feedback to SO Imperial college: interested to work with the academics TL: apologies
TL: public transport If the user comes with advocate we must cover both expenses - needs clarification CArmel: fair amount should be paid - if someone chooses something that is CV: not the mini wage London living wage TL: greater clarity on the 3 pyramids TL: headings difficult to Understand we describe in terms of principles JN: I was unclear who we referring to - very unclear on who this refers to Sonia: not unclear TL: it assumes u know what an expert advisor is JM: what are we talking about CCG may reject due to cost TL: phrased implementation GAb: I want to agree on the important of meaning of words - payment more volunteers may provide more time - add value - independent gets blurred TL: some people, wouldn't be able to attend because they couldn't afford to take part. TL: maybe called rewards JN: some people may only attend because they are paid JW: all professionals are paid it is not like attending a public meeting coproduction at the highest level means payment TL: how long do we do this for and something about accountability Update on the involvement Lay paper Description of the role when they meet and how Clarify the two headings like minded - VD to make sure Action froM RJC Action: Andrew to bring back an update Provider Board trusts in London get together GAb: 5 May digital citizen appealed to participation - it is a cutting piece of work Governance table cross cutting Action: all to send to RJC - STPS guide one pager Understand easy language detail against content 1) over view of STP the 4 projects 2) why is it better for the system 3) get the information over the next 2 4) short message - simply explain comment on its content 5) would this mean anything to people on the street 6) a number of individuals GAb, John, VD Carmel Two Task and Finsh groups 1) Diversity TL, SO 2) Feedback OF! CV! VD SO: National audit office review on STP - feedback to SO Imperial college: interested to work with the academics TL: apologies
iplg_8_augustminutes_0.docx