Food Security Program Project Rubric Requirement Great Job Good Job Needs Try Again Points Improvement Earned 10 points 9-8 points 7-6 points 5-0 points Information Defined and Defined and Defined and Defined and described described assigned described assigned described assigned assigned program program but was program but was program but it was well and in not as clear as it not as clear as it weak. Gives a understandable could have been. could have been. minimal overview of language. Gives a Gives a detailed Gives a minimal the program and/or detailed overview overview of the overview of the lists few local of the program program and lists program and lists programs. and lists local local programs. some local programs. programs. Citations All sources are One or Two sources Three or four Five or more cited correctly and are not cited, cited sources are not sources are not are reliable correctly, or reliable. cited, cited cited, cited sources correctly, or reliable. correctly, or reliable. Presentation Poster, Poster, PowerPoint, Poster, PowerPoint, Poster, PowerPoint, PowerPoint, Interview, or Guest Interview, or Guest Interview, or Guest Interview, or Speaker is not Speaker is not Speaker is not Guest Speaker is thorough or mildly thorough, lacks thorough, and lacks thorough, creative or have one creativity, or creativity, and creative, free from or two minor errors, disorganized. disorganized. errors, and or is mildly organized. organized. Handout Handout is Handout is Handout is Handout is not creative, free from somewhat creative, somewhat creative, creative, has 5 or errors, and has only 1 or 2 has 3 or more more errors, and is organized. errors, and errors, and is disorganized. organized. somewhat disorganized. Interview/ Interview Interview questions Interview questions Interview questions Local questions were were thoughtful and were developed were developed Program thoughtful and approved by with the help of the with the help of the Contact approved by teacher. Local teacher and then teacher and then teacher. Local program contact approved. Local approved or were program contact was researched program contact inappropriate. Local was thoroughly with some help from was researched but program contact researched. the teacher. needed a lot of help was researched but from teacher. needed a lot of help from teacher. Group Work Students worked Students mostly Students had to Students did not well together and worked well have intervention work well together all participated together and from teacher to and/or some equally. participated equally. work together. students did not participate.
Food Security Program Project Rubric Requirement Great Job 10 points Good Job 9-8 points Needs Improvement 7-6 points Try Again 5-0 points Points Earned Information Defined and described assigned program well and in understandable language. Gives a detailed overview of the program and lists local programs. Defined and described assigned program but was not as clear as it could have been. Gives a detailed overview of the program and lists local programs. Defined and described assigned program but was not as clear as it could have been. Gives a minimal overview of the program and lists some local programs. Defined and described assigned program but it was weak. Gives a minimal overview of the program and/or lists few local programs. Citations All sources are cited correctly and are reliable sources One or Two sources are not cited, cited correctly, or reliable. Three or four sources are not cited, cited correctly, or reliable. Five or more sources are not cited, cited correctly, or reliable. Presentation Poster, PowerPoint, Interview, or Guest Speaker is thorough, creative, free from errors, and organized. Poster, PowerPoint, Interview, or Guest Speaker is not thorough or mildly creative or have one or two minor errors, or is mildly organized. Poster, PowerPoint, Interview, or Guest Speaker is not thorough, lacks creativity, or disorganized. Poster, PowerPoint, Interview, or Guest Speaker is not thorough, and lacks creativity, and disorganized. Handout Handout is creative, free from errors, and organized. Handout is somewhat creative, has only 1 or 2 errors, and organized. Handout is somewhat creative, has 3 or more errors, and is somewhat disorganized. Handout is not creative, has 5 or more errors, and is disorganized. Interview/ Local Program Contact Interview questions were thoughtful and approved by teacher. Local program contact was thoroughly researched. Interview questions were thoughtful and approved by teacher. Local program contact was researched with some help from the teacher. Interview questions were developed with the help of the teacher and then approved. Local program contact was researched but needed a lot of help from teacher. Interview questions were developed with the help of the teacher and then approved or were inappropriate. Local program contact was researched but needed a lot of help from teacher. Group Work Students worked well together and all participated equally. Students mostly worked well together and participated equally. Students had to have intervention from teacher to work together. Students did not work well together and/or some students did not participate.
pfhs_obj_.3.01_food_security_program_project_rubric.docx