Projects x 4 Projects x 4 Projects x 2 Projects x 2 Activities x 14 Activities x 28 Activities x 27 Activities x 8 Judicial Regional Training Code of Judicial AdministrationProject CapacityProject Access to ConductProject Time Standards Toolkit Certification ToT JusticeProject (formerly Implementation(x4) CoJC and Complaints Workshop (x1 regional) CDR): Delay Reduction Pilot and Handling Toolkit as an Advanced RTT CD/PM Toolkit Implementation - Toolkit (x2) Additional Activity or via Workshop (x1 regional) via Responsive Fund IT Administrators’ Network Responsive Fund (x1) RTT Mentoring Network (regional) (regional) Core Judicial DevelopmentProject: Court Annual Regional Orientation Family Violence and ReportingProject(formerly Workshop (x1) Youth JusticeProject Regional Governance Local Orientation PM&E) Toolkit and Leadership Training Pilot and Toolkit Implementation, Implementation(x5) Meetings(x9 Toolkit (x1) regional) including Survey (x6 + 14 In-country follow-up / Regional Decision for data collection and monitoring visits (x5) Making Workshops (x2) reporting) Remote follow-up / Local Decision Making monitoring (x2) Pilot and Toolkit (x1) National Judicial Development Public CommitteeProject InformationProject Toolkit Pilot and Toolkit (x1) Implementation(x1) Enabling Rights Responsive Fund Project (minimum x17) Pilot and Toolkit (x1) The above project and activity structure reflects the refinement in the PJDP’s approach towards promotingincreased locaIisation of implementation and a stronger focus on strengthening the delivering services to beneficiaries. Thishas resulted in a shift in the allocation of resources. As graphically illustrated below, resourcing in this Extension Plan compared to the current 12-month Extension Plan has to some degree moved away from traditional training / professional development activities towards those projects that promote judicial and court development: Expenditure as a Percentage of the Budget Allocated to the Four Technical Components The approach to locating the planned activities adopted earlier in the implementation of Phase 2 has again been adopted. This has entailed partner courts ‘self-selecting’ which bi-lateral projects are to be undertaken in each jurisdiction as part of the stakeholder consultations at the leadership meetings in March 2013.In this way, courts have selected which activities best meet their priority development needs, in order to tailor Programme support and maximise development outcomes.
Projects x 4 Activities x 14 Projects x 4 Activities x 28 Projects x 2 Activities x 27 Projects x 2 Activities x 8 Access to JusticeProject (formerly CDR): Toolkit Implementation - via Responsive Fund Code of Judicial ConductProject CoJC and Complaints Handling Toolkit as an Additional Activity or via Responsive Fund (x1) Judicial AdministrationProject Time Standards Toolkit Implementation(x4) Delay Reduction Pilot and Toolkit (x2) IT Administrators’ Network (regional) Regional Training CapacityProject Certification ToT Workshop (x1 regional) Advanced RTT CD/PM Workshop (x1 regional) RTT Mentoring Network (regional) Family Violence and Youth JusticeProject Toolkit Implementation(x5) In-country follow-up / monitoring visits (x5) Remote follow-up / monitoring (x2) Regional Governance and Leadership Meetings(x9 regional) Court Annual ReportingProject(formerly PM&E) Toolkit Implementation, including Survey (x6 + 14 for data collection and reporting) Core Judicial DevelopmentProject: Regional Orientation Workshop (x1) Local Orientation Training Pilot and Toolkit (x1) Regional Decision Making Workshops (x2) Local Decision Making Pilot and Toolkit (x1) Public InformationProject Pilot and Toolkit (x1) National Judicial Development CommitteeProject Toolkit Implementation(x1) Enabling Rights Project Pilot and Toolkit (x1) Responsive Fund (minimum x17) The above project and activity structure reflects the refinement in the PJDP’s approach towards promotingincreased locaIisation of implementation and a stronger focus on strengthening the delivering services to beneficiaries. Thishas resulted in a shift in the allocation of resources. As graphically illustrated below, resourcing in this Extension Plan compared to the current 12-month Extension Plan has to some degree moved away from traditional training / professional development activities towards those projects that promote judicial and court development: Expenditure as a Percentage of the Budget Allocated to the Four Technical Components The approach to locating the planned activities adopted earlier in the implementation of Phase 2 has again been adopted. This has entailed partner courts ‘self-selecting’ which bi-lateral projects are to be undertaken in each jurisdiction as part of the stakeholder consultations at the leadership meetings in March 2013.In this way, courts have selected which activities best meet their priority development needs, in order to tailor Programme support and maximise development outcomes.
PJDP-24month-ext-2013-2015.docx