Appendix 7.b. HIED 8345 Leadership Theories Interview Paper Summer 2013 Grading Rubric Summary 5- Outstanding 4- Very good 3- Acceptable 2- Below expectations 1. Scholarly and Paper was extremely well organized Paper was clearly Papers organization was Paper organization was well organized and it effectively conveyed the organized but needs only marginally vague and it lacked clarity paper interview research improvement acceptable 5 2 0 0 Paper demonstrated outstanding use of Paper did represent Paper only marginally 2. Leadership “Leadership retrospective” Retrospective antecedents, specific roles, and extent topic is poorly developed “leadership presented “leadership of participation; and key elements in but needs topic and lacks specificity retrospective” retrospective” the leaders successes and failures were improvement highlighted effectively 5 2 0 0 3. Peer and Outstanding presentation of interactions Paper did present peer Paper only marginally and work “ “Peer work and communication with work and work presented and work topic is relationships” “peer relationships” relationship associates; nature of support; and topic but needs topic poorly developed and relationships” quality of working relationships improvement lacks specificity 4 3 0 0 4. Personal and Outstanding description applied to Paper did present Paper only marginally and professional “Personal professional benefits/satisfactions of leadership and presented and topic is “personal “personal development” development experiences; outstanding description of professional professional poorly developed and development” the intersection between personal and topic but topic lacks specificity development” professional life; outstanding highlights needs improvement of social life, spiritual and/or religious involvement 5 2 0 0
Appendix 7.b. HIED 8345 Leadership Theories Interview Paper Summer 2013 Grading Rubric Summary 5- Outstanding 4- Very good 3- Acceptable 2- Below expectations 1. Scholarly and well organized paper Paper was extremely well organized and it effectively conveyed the interview research 5 Paper was clearly organized but needs improvement 2 Papers organization was only marginally acceptable 0 Paper organization was vague and it lacked clarity 0 2. Leadership Retrospective Paper demonstrated outstanding use of antecedents, specific roles, and extent of participation; and key elements in the leaders successes and failures were highlighted effectively 5 Paper did represent “leadership retrospective” but needs improvement 2 Paper only marginally presented “leadership retrospective” topic 0 “Leadership retrospective” topic is poorly developed and lacks specificity 0 3. Peer and work relationship Outstanding presentation of interactions and communication with work associates; nature of support; and quality of working relationships 4 Paper did present “ peer and work relationships” topic but needs improvement 3 Paper only marginally presented “peer and work relationships” topic 0 “Peer and work relationships” topic is poorly developed and lacks specificity 0 4. Personal and professional development Outstanding description applied to benefits/satisfactions of leadership experiences; outstanding description of the intersection between personal and professional life; outstanding highlights of social life, spiritual and/or religious involvement 5 Paper did present “personal and professional development” topic but needs improvement 2 Paper only marginally presented “personal and professional development” topic 0 “Personal and professional development” topic is poorly developed and lacks specificity 0
HIED-DocProgAssessReport_2013_Rev1-1.docx