The Oregon Matrix for Summative Evaluations for Teachers and Administrators Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, all districts will use the Oregon Matrix Model for their summative evaluations. In the Oregon Matrix, Professional Practice (PP) and Professional Responsibilities (PR) intersect with Student Learning and Growth (SLG) culminating in a Professional Growth Plans (Facilitative, Collegial, Consulting, Directed) and summative performance level. When there is a discrepancy between the PP/PR level and SLG level, further inquiry is triggered to explore and understand the reasons for the discrepancy in order to then determine the Professional Growth Plan and corresponding summative performance level. COLLEGIAL FACILITATIVE or FACILITATIVE FACILITATIVE Focus on SLG Goals COLLEGIAL Focus on SLG Goals INQUIRY *SLG Determined post inquiry GOOD level of fidelity HIGHEST level of fidelity LEVEL 4 due to LOW level of between measures between measures (Highest) INQUIRY fidelity between measures *SLG due to only SOME level of fidelity between measures 3 3 or 4 4 4 Professional COLLEGIAL or COLLEGIAL PLAN COLLEGIAL COLLEGIAL CONSULTING and Focus on SLG Goals Determined post inquiry GOOD level of fidelity between HIGHEST level of fidelity GOOD level of fidelity measures between measures between measures LEVEL 3 INQUIRY *SLG Practice due to SOME level of fidelity between measures (PP/PR) 3 3 3 2 or 3 CONSULTING CONSULTING CONSULTING COLLEGIAL or CONSULTING Professional Determined post inquiry on GOOD level of fidelity HIGHEST level of fidelity GOOD level of fidelity LEVEL 2 INQUIRY *PP/PR Responsibilities between measures between measures between measures due to only SOME level of Rating fidelity between measures 2 2 2 2 or 3 DIRECTED DIRECTED CONSULTING or CONSULTING DIRECTED Combined Determined post inquiry INQUIRY *PP/PR LEVEL 1 HIGHEST level of fidelity GOOD level of fidelity between INQUIRY *PP/PR due to only LOW level of (Lowest) between measures measures due to only SOME level of fidelity between measures Y-AXIS: fidelity between measures 1 or 2 2 1 1 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 (Lowest) (Highest) X-AXIS: Rating on Student Learning and Growth *Ratings in these areas require an inquiry process in order to determine a summative performance level and Professional Growth Plan.
The Oregon Matrix for Summative Evaluations for Teachers and Administrators Beginning in the 2014-15 school year, all districts will use the Oregon Matrix Model for their summative evaluations. In the Oregon Matrix, Professional Practice (PP) and Professional Responsibilities (PR) intersect with Student Learning and Growth (SLG) culminating in a Professional Growth Plans (Facilitative, Collegial, Consulting, Directed) and summative performance level. When there is a discrepancy between the PP/PR level and SLG level, further inquiry is triggered to explore and understand the reasons for the discrepancy in order to then determine the Professional Growth Plan and corresponding summative performance level. Y-AXIS: Combined Rating on Professional Practice and Professional Responsibilities (PP/PR) LEVEL 4 (Highest) COLLEGIAL Focus on SLG Goals *SLG INQUIRY due to LOW level of fidelity between measures 3 FACILITATIVE or COLLEGIAL Focus on SLG Goals Determined post inquiry *SLG INQUIRY due to only SOME level of fidelity between measures 3 or 4 FACILITATIVE GOOD level of fidelity between measures 4 FACILITATIVE HIGHEST level of fidelity between measures 4 LEVEL 3 COLLEGIAL or CONSULTING Focus on SLG Goals Determined post inquiry *SLG INQUIRY due to SOME level of fidelity between measures 2 or 3 COLLEGIAL PLAN GOOD level of fidelity between measures 3 COLLEGIAL HIGHEST level of fidelity between measures 3 COLLEGIAL GOOD level of fidelity between measures 3 LEVEL 2 CONSULTING GOOD level of fidelity between measures 2 CONSULTING HIGHEST level of fidelity between measures 2 CONSULTING GOOD level of fidelity between measures 2 COLLEGIAL or CONSULTING Determined post inquiry *PP/PR INQUIRY due to only SOME level of fidelity between measures 2 or 3 LEVEL 1 (Lowest) DIRECTED HIGHEST level of fidelity between measures 1 DIRECTED GOOD level of fidelity between measures 1 CONSULTING or DIRECTED Determined post inquiry *PP/PR INQUIRY due to only SOME level of fidelity between measures 1 or 2 CONSULTING *PP/PR INQUIRY due to only LOW level of fidelity between measures 2 LEVEL 1 (Lowest) LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 (Highest) X-AXIS: Rating on Student Learning and Growth *Ratings in these areas require an inquiry process in order to determine a summative performance level and Professional Growth Plan.
philomathadministratorhandbook.docx