For use by Research Advisor(s) and Course Coordinator Student Name: Student ID: Name: Signature:_______________________________ Advisor’s Date: Section Rating (5=High) Content 1) Title of paper reflects content of paper 1 2 3 4 5 2) Abstract concisely summarizes paper 1 2 3 4 5 3) Clear thesis stated to guide paper and reader 1 2 3 4 5 4) Appropriate number of journal articles reviewed 1 2 3 4 5 5) Articles reviewed are current and relevant 1 2 3 4 5 6) Research is adequately reviewed and discussed 1 2 3 4 5 7) Key terms defined in the paper 1 2 3 4 5 8) Table summarizing primary/original research literature is 1 2 3 4 5 provided 9) Table is completed thoroughly and accurately 1 2 3 4 5 10) Nutritional implications are discussed 1 2 3 4 5 Organization 13) Introduction to paper provided 1 2 3 4 5 14) Body of paper divided into relevant required sections 1 2 3 4 5 15) Sections are clearly linked to one another 1 2 3 4 5 16) Paper is appropriate in length (25 pages of text) 1 2 3 4 5 17) Sections are clear and paper easy to follow 1 2 3 4 5 Style 18) Title page formatted per guidelines (title, name, 1 2 3 4 5 author’s student ID, 250 word abstract and 3-5 key words) 19) Manuscript formatted correctly (single-sided, 1 2 3 4 5 left-justified, numbered pages and 1 inch margins) Only tables/figures can be size 10 font and single 20) References in body of paper formatted correctly 1 2 3 4 5 21) References at end of paper formatted correctly 1 2 3 4 5 22) No more than one spelling mistake per two pages of text 1 2 3 4 5 23) Sentences well formed grammatically 1 2 3 4 5 24) Paragraphs used effectively to organize ideas 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL (110 points) General Comments APPENDIX V Manuscript Evaluation Form
For use by Research Advisor(s) and Course Coordinator Student Name: Student ID: Advisor’s Name: Signature:_______________________________ Date: Section Rating (5=High) Content 1) Title of paper reflects content of paper 2) Abstract concisely summarizes paper 3) Clear thesis stated to guide paper and reader 4) Appropriate number of journal articles reviewed 5) Articles reviewed are current and relevant 6) Research is adequately reviewed and discussed 7) Key terms defined in the paper 8) Table summarizing primary/original research literature is provided 9) Table is completed thoroughly and accurately 10) Nutritional implications are discussed 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Organization 13) Introduction to paper provided 14) Body of paper divided into relevant required sections 15) Sections are clearly linked to one another 16) Paper is appropriate in length (25 pages of text) 17) Sections are clear and paper easy to follow 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Style 18) Title page formatted per guidelines (title, author’s name, student ID, 250 word abstract and 3-5 key words) 19) Manuscript formatted correctly (single-sided, left-justified, numbered pages and 1 inch margins) Only tables/figures can be size 10 font and single 20) References in body of paper formatted correctly 21) References at end of paper formatted correctly 22) No more than one spelling mistake per two pages of text 23) Sentences well formed grammatically 24) Paragraphs used effectively to organize ideas 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL (110 points) General Comments APPENDIX V Manuscript Evaluation Form
HNSC_4120_2018-19.docx