Allegation #8 Providing the researcher with the VRB (3) Bias / errors and Complaint 3.G decision and medical reports created a bias quality of report in the researcher's mind towards Appellant A. Allegation #9 The qualifications of Writeway researchers (4) Unsuitable Complaint 3.H are questionable given they don't hold qualifications private investigator licenses and lack professional qualifications in military research etc. (para 3.1.11). Allegation #10 Writeway’s Director illegally obtained (5) Fraudulent / Complaint 3.I and fraudulent evidence from a former member unauthorised paragraph 4.4 of of the Department of Defence and used this document relied Complaint false document to furnish his company's upon research report, to be used in the Appellant A case (para 4.1). Allegation #11 A member of the Department of Defence (5) Fraudulent / Complaint 3.J fraudulently wrote Attachment 1 of the unauthorised Writeway report. In particular it is alleged document relied that, under oath at the Appellant A hearing, upon one of the witnesses said that Writeway’s Director asked a former member of the Department of Defence to draft Attachment 1. Allegation #12 Attachment 1 has had some information (5) Fraudulent / Complaint 3.K the faxes omitted and only two of the unauthorised six pages have been submitted. document relied upon Allegation #13 Attachment 1 has a falsified signature block (5) Fraudulent / Complaint 3.L from the Director of a Division of the unauthorised Department of Defence. document relied upon
Allegation #8 Providing the researcher with the VRB decision and medical reports created a bias in the researcher's mind towards Appellant A. (3) Bias / errors and quality of report Complaint 3.G Allegation #9 The qualifications of Writeway researchers are questionable given they don't hold private investigator licenses and lack professional qualifications in military research etc. (para 3.1.11). (4) Unsuitable qualifications Complaint 3.H Allegation #10 Writeway’s Director illegally obtained fraudulent evidence from a former member of the Department of Defence and used this false document to furnish his company's research report, to be used in the Appellant A case (para 4.1). (5) Fraudulent / unauthorised document relied upon Complaint 3.I and paragraph 4.4 of Complaint Allegation #11 A member of the Department of Defence fraudulently wrote Attachment 1 of the Writeway report. In particular it is alleged that, under oath at the Appellant A hearing, one of the witnesses said that Writeway’s Director asked a former member of the Department of Defence to draft Attachment 1. (5) Fraudulent / unauthorised document relied upon Complaint 3.J Allegation #12 Attachment 1 has had some information the faxes omitted and only two of the six pages have been submitted. (5) Fraudulent / unauthorised document relied upon Complaint 3.K Allegation #13 Attachment 1 has a falsified signature block from the Director of a Division of the Department of Defence. (5) Fraudulent / unauthorised document relied upon Complaint 3.L
investigationreport.docx