against the Court below which the Appellant claimed had rendered the judgment of the Court below now on appeal, a nullity. The complaint of the Appellant in this issue arose from the proceedings of the Court below of 8th October, 2013 where for no apparent reason, the learned Counsel to the Appellant at the Court below refused to move the Appellant's application for extension of time to file the Appellant's/1st Respondent's brief of argument. Learned Counsel to the Appellant refused to move the motion for extension of time to file Appellant's/1st Respondent's brief of argument when that Court was prepared to take the motion in the absence of any objection from the other parties. The Appellant's Counsel instead of moving the motion, asked for adjournment which was refused by the Court below on being opposed by the other parties. There upon, the record of the Court below for proceedings of 8th October, 2013, recorded the following action for the learned Counsel to the Appellant then the 1st Respondent before that Court. "Court: The Respondent Counsel Prince
against the Court below which the Appellant claimed had rendered the judgment of the Court below now on appeal, a nullity. The complaint of the Appellant in this issue arose from the proceedings of the Court below of 8th October, 2013 where for no apparent reason, the learned Counsel to the Appellant at the Court below refused to move the Appellant's application for extension of time to file the Appellant's/1st Respondent's brief of argument. Learned Counsel to the Appellant refused to move the motion for extension of time to file Appellant's/1st Respondent's brief of argument when that Court was prepared to take the motion in the absence of any objection from the other parties. The Appellant's Counsel instead of moving the motion, asked for adjournment which was refused by the Court below on being opposed by the other parties. There upon, the record of the Court below for proceedings of 8th October, 2013, recorded the following action for the learned Counsel to the Appellant then the 1st Respondent before that Court. "Court: The Respondent Counsel Prince
jbd_judgements_supreme_court_nicholas_c_uchachukwu_vs._peoples_democratic_party__3ors.docx