and it is in the interest to reflect success. Saudi Arabian program’s newspapers have reported that the program has changed the beliefs of members of A less bias measure of success is the interest from other countries in the structure and methods with the United States being one of the interested program’s countries. This interest from other countries indicates that others deem the program to be successful. Danish Security and Dialogue Forum Intelligence Service’s (PET) In 2008, the Danish Security and Intelligence Service (PET) launched the Dialogue Forum against militant extremism as part of their larger counter-radicalization efforts; this is around the same time the PET noted a rise in the terrorist threat in Centre for Prevention personnel organize biannual meetings on a Denmark. PET’s regular basis with selected Muslim community leaders, including imams, teachers, housing associations, and welfare professionals. The Danish government believes these Muslim community leaders interact the most with individuals at risk of radicalization. All invited participants must not engage in violence or encourage violence. The program strives to bring together individuals to engage in discussion and “disagreeing dialogue,” or debate, while promoting understanding of policies for in countering PET’s radicalization and terrorism. The program also facilitates a level of trust and communication between government officials and community leaders, so that community leaders can help formulate effective counter-radicalization efforts. PET also brings in subject matter experts to participate in some discussions to narratives through “challenge evidence based The purpose of these discussions is to provide the discussion.”
and it is in the program’s interest to reflect success. Saudi Arabian newspapers have reported that the program has changed the beliefs of members of A less bias measure of success is the interest from other countries in the program’s structure and methods with the United States being one of the interested countries. This interest from other countries indicates that others deem the program to be successful. Danish Security and Intelligence Service’s (PET) Dialogue Forum In 2008, the Danish Security and Intelligence Service (PET) launched the Dialogue Forum against militant extremism as part of their larger counter-radicalization efforts; this is around the same time the PET noted a rise in the terrorist threat in Denmark. PET’s Centre for Prevention personnel organize biannual meetings on a regular basis with selected Muslim community leaders, including imams, teachers, housing associations, and welfare professionals. The Danish government believes these Muslim community leaders interact the most with individuals at risk of radicalization. All invited participants must not engage in violence or encourage violence. The program strives to bring together individuals to engage in discussion and “disagreeing dialogue,” or debate, while promoting understanding of PET’s policies for in countering radicalization and terrorism. The program also facilitates a level of trust and communication between government officials and community leaders, so that community leaders can help formulate effective counter-radicalization efforts. PET also brings in subject matter experts to participate in some discussions to “challenge narratives through evidence based discussion.” The purpose of these discussions is to provide the
Hendrickson%20Jennifer%20-%20Global%20Security%20Studies%20Thesis-For%20Publication%20Final.docx