Annex 2 Monitoring Plan The Project Manager/Coordinator will collect results data according to the following monitoring plan. Data source/Collection Frequency Responsible for Assumptions and Risks Monitoring Indicators Means of verification Methods data collection Project objective: 0.1: Extent to which legal or Consultations with Annually Project Manager/ Official government Assumptions: There is policy or institutional government M&E Officer notifications and sufficient political will to To reduce the frameworks are in place for institutions and Coordinator IP announcements for support revision of key volume of conservation, sustainable use, partners to review new legislation policies, laws and unsustainable and access and benefit sharing policy and legal Monitoring progress regulations wildlife trade and of natural resources, frameworks status reports the rate of loss of biodiversity and ecosystems. There are no major globally significant (IRRF Output 2.5 indicator bureaucratic delays in biodiversity in 2.5.1) seeing revisions through to Indonesia and East approval stage and South-East Asia Risks: Political change 0.2: Number of direct project Review of project MTR and TE Project Manager/ Reports from Assumptions: Continuing beneficiaries: reports; M&E officer consultation processes level of political will to - Number of government questionnaire Coordinator IP Survey Results support the project agency staff including surveys for target Monitoring progress intervention enforcement officers who communities in reports improved their knowledge and demo areas Good relationship continues skills on IWT due to the project between enforcement (m/f) agencies and key CSO - Number of local people in partners project demonstration areas benefiting from engagement in Risks: Communities do not conservation activities, reduced accept project intervention HWC impacts and improved in their areas livelihoods (m/f)
Annex 2 Monitoring Plan The Project Manager/Coordinator will collect results data according to the following monitoring plan. Monitoring Indicators Data source/Collection Methods Frequency Responsible for data collection Means of verification Assumptions and Risks Project objective: To reduce the volume of unsustainable wildlife trade and the rate of loss of globally significant biodiversity in Indonesia and East and South-East Asia 0.1: Extent to which legal or policy or institutional frameworks are in place for conservation, sustainable use, and access and benefit sharing of natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems. (IRRF Output 2.5 indicator 2.5.1) Consultations with government institutions and partners to review policy and legal frameworks status Annually Project Manager/ M&E Officer Coordinator IP Official government notifications and announcements for new legislation Monitoring progress reports Assumptions: There is sufficient political will to support revision of key policies, laws and regulations There are no major bureaucratic delays in seeing revisions through to approval stage Risks: Political change 0.2: Number of direct project beneficiaries: - Number of government agency staff including enforcement officers who improved their knowledge and skills on IWT due to the project (m/f) - Number of local people in project demonstration areas benefiting from engagement in conservation activities, reduced HWC impacts and improved livelihoods (m/f) Review of project reports; questionnaire surveys for target communities in demo areas MTR and TE Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP Reports from consultation processes Survey Results Monitoring progress reports Assumptions: Continuing level of political will to support the project intervention Good relationship continues between enforcement agencies and key CSO partners Risks: Communities do not accept project intervention in their areas
PIMS_5391_IWT_Indonesia__Prodoc_resubmission_April_5__2017.docx