Well-written Summary—You did a good job of summarizing the article. Quality was above average. Exceptionally Well-Written— you summarized the article in a concise and adequately complete fashion, incorporating most of the core concepts. Content Reflection (15 Points) Thoughtful and Your did not “Reflection” insightful adequately relate to the content of the article. Reflection is approximately 1 page of Good connection to text and includes: core ideas in the This section was not article sufficiently developed (1 page response to the article was “Initial min.) given Missing/Partial Good insights was “Design/methodology” More effort needed to discussed (if appropriate) Your discussion was with the concepts “connect” Missing/partial poignant and in the article. 0 heartfelt. Thank you gained” were discussed. “Insights for sharing. Missing/partial for interest in topic” “Reasons were- discussed Missing/partial research interest based on “Future topic” was discussed. Missing/partial Interesting In the future, please describe Content Application (30 Points) counseling scenario a human services specific counseling situation (case Application is approximately 1 page of Good integration and study, etc.). See my Sample text and includes. application of core Journal Article Review ideas to your human Student has applied the article’s core services counseling More work is needed to ideas to a specific human services 0 situation incorporate/integrate the core counseling situation (describe the of the article into your scenario and counseling issue). Make sure you counseling scenario explain you are why Article’s ideas clearly integrated, integrating these In-text citations need to be applied, and cited. Needs more work techniques based on used for the core ideas that Core ideas not adequately integrated your assessment of you are incorporating into the client. your clinical scenario.
Well-written Summary—You did a good job of summarizing the article. Quality was above average. Exceptionally Well-Written— you summarized the article in a concise and adequately complete fashion, incorporating most of the core concepts. Content Reflection (15 Points) Reflection is approximately 1 page of text and includes: “Initial response to the article was given Missing/Partial “Design/methodology” was discussed (if appropriate) Missing/partial “Insights gained” were discussed. Missing/partial “Reasons for interest in topic” were- discussed Missing/partial “Future research interest based on topic” was discussed. Missing/partial 0 Thoughtful and insightful Good connection to core ideas in the article Good insights Your discussion was poignant and heartfelt. Thank you for sharing. Your “Reflection” did not adequately relate to the content of the article. This section was not sufficiently developed (1 page min.) More effort needed to “connect” with the concepts in the article. Content Application (30 Points) Application is approximately 1 page of text and includes. Student has applied the article’s core ideas to a specific human services counseling situation (describe the scenario and counseling issue). Article’s ideas clearly integrated, applied, and cited. Needs more work Core ideas not adequately integrated 0 Interesting counseling scenario Good integration and application of core ideas to your human services counseling situation Make sure you explain why you are integrating these techniques based on your assessment of the client. In the future, please describe a specific human services counseling situation (case study, etc.). See my Sample Journal Article Review More work is needed to incorporate/integrate the core of the article into your counseling scenario In-text citations need to be used for the core ideas that you are incorporating into your clinical scenario.
HSCO%20%20JAR%20Grading%20Rubric--Use%20of%20Prayer%20and%20Scripture%20Revised%20Final.docx