Table 5B - PFMP-II Summary Monitoring Framework (to be refined and expanded during inception and as interventions are confirmed and designed – and then reviewed annually after that) Frequency of How will results be Indicators What we will measure How we will measure Who will measure measurement reported & used Goal: Contribute to delivery of safe and accessible public infrastructure for inclusive and sustainable economic growth in the Philippines PFMP-II M&E Semi-annual progress Number of DBM, DOTr or DPWH Examples of new practice adoption in DBM, Evaluative studies, case Annual Specialist with inputs reports and case operational breakthroughs that reduce DOTr and DPWH that support better studies, performance from NEDA and studies used to delays in infrastructure project delivery infrastructure delivery (e.g. reduced time to monitoring PFMP-II technical inform portfolio delivery from active use of procurement advisers reviews and dialogue guide, ROWSA guide for specific projects) with NEDA, DBM, DOTr, and DPWH. End-of-Program Outcome: Targeted Philippines government agencies and private sector service providers use more efficient, collaborative and innovative systems for inclusive public infrastructure delivery PFMP-II M&E Semi-annual progress % DOTr infrastructure tenders classified Total number of infrastructure tenders Semi-annual review of DOTr Semi-annual “failed” (by number & value) issued by DOTr disaggregated by those procurements with support Specialist with inputs reports and case from PFM and studies used to classified “failed” and those classified from GPPB – compared “successful” against 2017 baseline Transport/ inform portfolio Infrastructure reviews as well as % DPWH infrastructure tenders classified Total number of infrastructure tenders Semi-annual review of DPWH Semi-annual Specialists working dialogue with NEDA, “failed” (by number & value) issued by DPWH disaggregated by those procurements with support with DOTr and DPWH DBM, GPPB, DOTr and classified “failed” and those classified from GPPB staff DPWH. “successful” % infrastructure disbursement delivered Total, actual cash disbursement for Semi-annual review of Semi-annual Information shared through BTMS [in PHP billion] infrastructure projects [in PHP billion] infrastructure project with influencers to disaggregated by amounts through BTMS disbursement in selected support advocacy for and amounts otherwise managed agencies with support from better infrastructure DBM and BTr delivery.
Table 5B - PFMP-II Summary Monitoring Framework (to be refined and expanded during inception and as interventions are confirmed and designed – and then reviewed annually after that) Indicators What we will measure How we will measure Who will measure Frequency of measurement How will results be reported & used Goal: Contribute to delivery of safe and accessible public infrastructure for inclusive and sustainable economic growth in the Philippines Number of DBM, DOTr or DPWH operational breakthroughs that reduce delays in infrastructure project delivery Examples of new practice adoption in DBM, DOTr and DPWH that support better infrastructure delivery (e.g. reduced time to delivery from active use of procurement guide, ROWSA guide for specific projects) Evaluative studies, case studies, performance monitoring PFMP-II M&E Specialist with inputs from NEDA and PFMP-II technical advisers Annual Semi-annual progress reports and case studies used to inform portfolio reviews and dialogue with NEDA, DBM, DOTr, and DPWH. End-of-Program Outcome: Targeted Philippines government agencies and private sector service providers use more efficient, collaborative and innovative systems for inclusive public infrastructure delivery % DOTr infrastructure tenders classified “failed” (by number & value) % DPWH infrastructure tenders classified “failed” (by number & value) % infrastructure disbursement delivered through BTMS [in PHP billion] Total number of infrastructure tenders issued by DOTr disaggregated by those classified “failed” and those classified “successful” Total number of infrastructure tenders issued by DPWH disaggregated by those classified “failed” and those classified “successful” Total, actual cash disbursement for infrastructure projects [in PHP billion] disaggregated by amounts through BTMS and amounts otherwise managed Semi-annual review of DOTr procurements with support from GPPB – compared against 2017 baseline Semi-annual review of DPWH procurements with support from GPPB Semi-annual review of infrastructure project disbursement in selected agencies with support from DBM and BTr PFMP-II M&E Specialist with inputs from PFM and Transport/ Infrastructure Specialists working with DOTr and DPWH staff Semi-annual Semi-annual Semi-annual Semi-annual progress reports and case studies used to inform portfolio reviews as well as dialogue with NEDA, DBM, GPPB, DOTr and DPWH. Information shared with influencers to support advocacy for better infrastructure delivery.
pfmp-ii-investment-design-document-final-draft.docx