Mastery Grading Procedures Plan Required for All Schools – Strategic Plan Goal: Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready. Strategic Plan Focus Area: Academic growth/high academic achievement Navigator Pathway: At/Above Grade Level in At/Above Grade Level in Enter Kindergarten ready Advanced Reading in K-2 Reading/Writing Grade 3 Reading/Writing Grade 7 Take and pass at least 1 At/Above Grade Level in Math Successful completion of Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & Grades 3-5 Math I in grade 9 ACT exam Data Used: Summative Assessments, EOG Assessment Results, PowerSchool Grade Book Strategies Point Person Evidence of Success Funding Personnel Timeline (determined by what data) (title/name) (Student Impact) (estimated Involved (Start—End) Task cost / source) Interim Task Dates Task (PD) 1. Common assessments Facilitators Increased achievement on post N/A Admin Sept - June (Giers, assessments Pre- and post- assessments Kreutzberger, Facilitators created in School Net aligned to Ricks, Hakeem) Disaggregated data from objectives common assessments Quarterly Common Assessments will be created and used each quarter 2. Data disaggregation Principal (Becker) Lesson Plans for core and N/A Admin Sept June workshop groups Student Achievement will be Admin Facilitators monitored by objective in order (McLaughlin, Differentiated Instruction provided to facilitate Woodruff, in lesson plans Classroom remediation/intervention plans Dermott, Phillips) Teachers (i.e. RTI) Facilitators (Giers, Kreutzberger, Ricks, Hakeem)
Mastery Grading Procedures Plan – Required for All Schools Strategic Plan Goal: Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st-century learning environment for every child to graduate college- and career-ready. Strategic Plan Focus Area: Academic growth/high academic achievement Navigator Pathway: Enter Kindergarten ready Advanced Reading in K-2 At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3 At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7 At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5 Successful completion of Math I in grade 9 Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT Data Used: Summative Assessments, EOG Assessment Results, PowerSchool Grade Book Strategies (determined by what data) Task Task Task (PD) Point Person (title/name) Evidence of Success (Student Impact) Funding (estimated cost / source) Personnel Involved Timeline (Start—End) Interim Dates 1. Common assessments Pre- and post- assessments created in School Net aligned to objectives Quarterly Common Assessments will be created and used each quarter Facilitators (Giers, Kreutzberger, Ricks, Hakeem) Increased achievement on post assessments Disaggregated data from common assessments N/A Admin Facilitators Sept - June 2. Data disaggregation Student Achievement will be monitored by objective in order to facilitate remediation/intervention plans (i.e. RTI) Principal (Becker) Admin (McLaughlin, Woodruff, Dermott, Phillips) Facilitators (Giers, Kreutzberger, Ricks, Hakeem) Lesson Plans for core and workshop groups Differentiated Instruction provided in lesson plans N/A Admin Facilitators Classroom Teachers Sept June
HGES%20School%20Improvement%20Plan%202014-15.docx