The increase in height and FSR will not reduce the safety, efficiency, and ongoing operation of the classified road. Further detail on design and location to ameliorate potential traffic noise or vehicle emissions within the precinct of the development will be provided at DA stage. Q6. Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable Ministerial Directions (s.117 directions)? The Planning Proposal is consistent with the Ministerial Directions as described in the table below. Consistency with Ministerial directions Ministerial Direction Comment 1 Employment and Resources 1.1 Business and Industrial Consistent. The proposal is consistent with this direction. Zones The planning proposal introduces the potential for additional Floor Space for non-residential development. This is expected to encourage additional employment uses at the precinct. 1.2 Rural Zones Not applicable. 1.3 Mining, Petroleum Not applicable. Production and Extractive Industries 1.4 Oyster Aquaculture Not applicable. 1.5 Rural Lands Not applicable. 2 Environment and Heritage 2.1 Environment Protection Not applicable. zones 2.2 Coastal Protection Not applicable. 2.3 Heritage Conservation Consistent. The area has a strong heritage context. The planning proposal sets height controls to respect heritage items and transition to the adjoining conservation area. The property at 255 Broadway is recommended as an additional listed item in Schedule 5 of the LEP as
The increase in height and FSR will not reduce the safety, efficiency, and ongoing operation of the classified road. Further detail on design and location to ameliorate potential traffic noise or vehicle emissions within the precinct of the development will be provided at DA stage. Q6. Is the planning proposal consistent with applicable Ministerial Directions (s.117 directions)? The Planning Proposal is consistent with the Ministerial Directions as described in the table below. Consistency with Ministerial directions Ministerial Direction Comment 1 Employment and Resources 1.1 Business and Industrial Zones Consistent. The proposal is consistent with this direction. The planning proposal introduces the potential for additional Floor Space for non-residential development. This is expected to encourage additional employment uses at the precinct. 1.2 Rural Zones Not applicable. 1.3 Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries Not applicable. 1.4 Oyster Aquaculture Not applicable. 1.5 Rural Lands Not applicable. 2 Environment and Heritage 2.1 Environment Protection zones Not applicable. 2.2 Coastal Protection Not applicable. 2.3 Heritage Conservation Consistent. The area has a strong heritage context. The planning proposal sets height controls to respect heritage items and transition to the adjoining conservation area. The property at 255 Broadway is recommended as an additional listed item in Schedule 5 of the LEP as
Planning-Proposal-225-to-279-Broadway-accessible.DOCX