citizens. The contested delimitation of and in the current ‘constitutional justice’, ‘cosmopolitan justice’, ‘commutative justice’ ‘equity’ EU crises measures illustrates like the WTO guarantees of and – ‘violation complaints’ ‘non-violation complaints’ ‘situation (cf. Articles XXIII GATT and GATS) the constitutional tasks of citizens, parliaments and courts of justice to further complaints’ – of and to take more seriously the customary law requirements of interpreting treaties, and settling clarify competing ‘principles justice’ with principles of and human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. As illustrated by the related disputes, ‘in conformity justice’ financial crises since 2008, also questions of private ordering raise constitutional issues requiring legal limitations of both ‘market as well as of in conformity with and more limited international failures’ ‘governance failures’ ‘cosmopolitan constitutionalism’ agreements on As limitations of the of self-congratulatory of ‘multilevel constitutionalism’. ‘dogmatic slumber hybris’ (Kumm) constitutional nationalists and citizens, parliaments and courts of justice to engage in for ‘international realists’ require ‘struggles and for public constitutional reforms justified by constitutional justice’ ‘cosmopolitan reason’, pragmatic incremental ‘multilevel are no less important than on vis-à-vis the ubiquity of abuses of public pluralism’ ‘purist insistence’ ‘cosmopolitan constitutionalism’ and private power in IEL.-
citizens. The contested delimitation of ‘constitutional justice’, ‘cosmopolitan justice’, ‘commutative justice’ and ‘equity’ in the current EU crises measures illustrates – like the WTO guarantees of ‘violation complaints’ ‘non-violation complaints’ and ‘situation complaints’ (cf. Articles XXIII GATT and GATS) – the constitutional tasks of citizens, parliaments and courts of justice to further clarify competing ‘principles of justice’ and to take more seriously the customary law requirements of interpreting treaties, and settling related disputes, ‘in conformity with principles of justice’ and human rights and fundamental freedoms for all. As illustrated by the financial crises since 2008, also questions of private ordering raise constitutional issues requiring legal limitations of both ‘market failures’ as well as of ‘governance failures’ in conformity with ‘cosmopolitan constitutionalism’ and more limited international agreements on ‘multilevel constitutionalism’. As limitations of the ‘dogmatic slumber of self-congratulatory hybris’ (Kumm) of constitutional nationalists and ‘international realists’ require citizens, parliaments and courts of justice to engage in ‘struggles for justice’ and for ‘cosmopolitan public reason’, pragmatic incremental constitutional reforms justified by ‘multilevel constitutional pluralism’ are no less important than ‘purist insistence’ on ‘cosmopolitan constitutionalism’ vis-à-vis the ubiquity of abuses of public and private power in IEL.-
petersmann_madrid-seminar-2013.docx