Activity A looks like . . . Self-Assessment “5” Top administrative leaders (president, provost, vice Rating on a scale of 1 to 5: Activity 1: presidents, and deans, etc.) have a full understanding of There is a Description of current status: and are committed to math pathways at scale. strong and clearly Leaders have integrated math pathways into the vision defined and strategic plan of the institution. The work is institutional explicitly connected to other student success initiatives. commitment. Leaders consistently communicate the commitment to Ongoing until the full institutional community. normative Next steps: practice is The institutional community understands and established. embraces this commitment. Leaders actively and regularly monitor progress towards goals, provide guidance and support when necessary, and provide resources to support implementation. Activity 2: A leadership team with active involvement from Rating on a scale of 1 to 5: representatives of diverse stakeholders (e.g., faculty, Establish Description of current status: and convene staff, administration) is established with a clear charge a leadership and defined roles and responsibilities. team. Team meets regularly, and has a timeline and an action Ongoing plan. normative Next steps: Team has effective processes for monitoring progress practice is and documenting decisions. established. As implementation progresses, team evaluates for quality and for success in meeting goals for scale, and revises and refines plans based on the evaluation.
Activity A “5” looks like . . . Self-Assessment Activity 1: There is a strong and clearly defined institutional commitment. Ongoing until normative practice is established. Top administrative leaders (president, provost, vice presidents, and deans, etc.) have a full understanding of and are committed to math pathways at scale. Leaders have integrated math pathways into the vision and strategic plan of the institution. The work is explicitly connected to other student success initiatives. Leaders consistently communicate the commitment to the full institutional community. The institutional community understands and embraces this commitment. Leaders actively and regularly monitor progress towards goals, provide guidance and support when necessary, and provide resources to support implementation. Rating on a scale of 1 to 5: Description of current status: Next steps: Activity 2: Establish and convene a leadership team. Ongoing normative practice is established. A leadership team with active involvement from representatives of diverse stakeholders (e.g., faculty, staff, administration) is established with a clear charge and defined roles and responsibilities. Team meets regularly, and has a timeline and an action plan. Team has effective processes for monitoring progress and documenting decisions. As implementation progresses, team evaluates for quality and for success in meeting goals for scale, and revises and refines plans based on the evaluation. Rating on a scale of 1 to 5: Description of current status: Next steps:
Implementation%20Process%20Self-Assess.docx