please also explain what difficulties you think might arise from calculating monetary values, and whether this should be on an annualized basis, and if so, how? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_21> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_21> Question 22 Given the number of tables shown in the KID, do you think a more graphic presentation of the breakout table should be preferred? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_22> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_22> Question 23 The example presented includes a possible way of showing the variability of performance fees, by showing the level for all three performance scenarios in the KID, highlighting the scenario, ‘moderate‘ which would be used for the calculation of the total costs. Do you believe that this additional information should be included in the KID? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_23> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_23> Question 24 To reduce the volume of information, should the first and the second table of Annex VII be combined in one table? Should this be supplemented with a breakdown of costs as suggested in the graphic above? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_24> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_24> Question 25 In relation to paragraph 68 a) of Annex VI: Shall the RTS specify that for structured products calculations for the cost free scenario have always to be based on an adjustment of the payments by the investor? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_25> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_25> Question 26
please also explain what difficulties you think might arise from calculating monetary values, and whether this should be on an annualized basis, and if so, how? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_21> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_21> Question 22 Given the number of tables shown in the KID, do you think a more graphic presentation of the breakout table should be preferred? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_22> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_22> Question 23 The example presented includes a possible way of showing the variability of performance fees, by showing the level for all three performance scenarios in the KID, highlighting the ‘moderate‘ scenario, which would be used for the calculation of the total costs. Do you believe that this additional information should be included in the KID? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_23> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_23> Question 24 To reduce the volume of information, should the first and the second table of Annex VII be combined in one table? Should this be supplemented with a breakdown of costs as suggested in the graphic above? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_24> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_24> Question 25 In relation to paragraph 68 a) of Annex VI: Shall the RTS specify that for structured products calculations for the cost free scenario have always to be based on an adjustment of the payments by the investor? <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_25> TYPE YOUR TEXT HERE <ESMA_QUESTION_PRIIPS_25> Question 26
jc_2015_073r_form_to_reply_cp_priips.docx