Stakeholder Advantages of data flow from social Advantages of data flow to social registry to (…) registry from (…) National social Programs can use data from Registry continuously updated protection the registry (and potentially Being able to keep track of programs national poverty index) to select who receives what their beneficiaries Integrated M&E across Programs can benefit from programs further data integration Potential for integrating established at national level services across programs (e.g. verifying data with civil registry) Programs can be given access to integrated M&E information Potential for integrating services across programs registry and/or Data collection effort for registry National ID number acts as national ID number could help identify and register unique identifier and enables (see also Section unregistered individuals instant linkage with other 4.2.4) government databases Civil registry or National ID data can be used as an information base on all citizens (e.g. name, address), including notification of births and deaths Authentication of registry data Bank or other Potential for coordinating Payment authentication and payment institution payments across different reconciliation across programs (economies of programs Tax authority Tax authority could benefit from Tax data can be cross- better understanding of poverty checked (e.g. to aid eligibility and social protection receipt decisions and prevent fraud) Social security Better integration, coordination Social security data can be database and planning across social cross-checked (e.g. protection and social insurance employment status and social insurance receipt to aid Development of eligibility decisions and complementary packages prevent fraud) targeted at social protection beneficiaries (primarily health Better integration, Insurance) coordination and planning across social protection and social insurance
Stakeholder Advantages of data flow from social registry to (…) Advantages of data flow to social registry from (…) National social protection programs Programs can use data from the registry (and potentially national poverty index) to select their beneficiaries Programs can benefit from further data integration established at national level (e.g. verifying data with civil registry) Programs can be given access to integrated M&E information Potential for integrating services across programs Registry continuously updated Being able to keep track of who receives what Integrated M&E across programs Potential for integrating services across programs registry and/or national ID number (see also Section 4.2.4) Data collection effort for registry could help identify and register unregistered individuals National ID number acts as unique identifier and enables instant linkage with other government databases Civil registry or National ID data can be used as an information base on all citizens (e.g. name, address), including notification of births and deaths Authentication of registry data Bank or other payment institution Potential for coordinating payments across different programs (economies of Payment authentication and reconciliation across programs Tax authority Tax authority could benefit from better understanding of poverty and social protection receipt Tax data can be (e.g. to aid eligibility decisions and prevent fraud) Social security database Better integration, coordination and planning across social protection and social insurance Development of complementary packages targeted at social protection beneficiaries (primarily health Insurance) Social security data can be cross-checked (e.g. employment status and social insurance receipt to aid eligibility decisions and prevent fraud) Better integration, coordination and planning across social protection and social insurance checked cross-
integrating-data-information-management-social-protection-full.docx