Work of a distinctive Work at a meritable Work of a passing Work not of a passing SSRI Assessment standard (70%/+) standard (60-69%) standard (50-59%) standard (below 50%) Criteria Evidence of integration of Explicit and extensive Good evidence is shown of Some evidence is shown of Evidence of critically concepts and theoretical evidence is shown of critically evaluating the critically evaluating the evaluating the concepts perspectives of research critically evaluating the relevant concepts and relevant concepts and and theoretical and reflective academic relevant concepts and theoretical perspectives of theoretical perspectives of perspectives of research practice in design and theoretical perspectives of research and reflective research and reflective and reflective practice is implementation of the research and reflective practice for the project, practice for the project, highly limited or lacking. project, aligned to the practice for the project with alignment to the and/or with limited Limited or lacking UKPSF (A5, V3) with clarity in alignment to UKPSF alignment to the UKPSF alignment to the UKPSF the UKPSF Evidence of recent, current The participant has The participant has The participant has The participant has shown and ongoing engagement in cogently and critically critically and undertaken the review and little or no evidence of critically reflective practice reviewed their an aspect of evaluated the outcomes evaluation of outcomes critical review and through design, their current academic achieved in relation to their achieved in relation to their evaluation of the outcomes development and practice and evaluated the current /ongoing academic current /ongoing academic achieved in relation to their engagement in academic outcomes achieved practice practice, but in a more current/ongoing academic practice and in evaluation of limited manner practice outcomes achieved (all aspects of Descriptor 2) Evidence of ability to work The participant is able to The participant is able to The participant is able to The participant shows on problems of professional demonstrate advanced demonstrate good skills in demonstrate some skill in limited demonstration of, practice including in gaining skills in reflective practice, reflective practice, reflective practice, or neglect to demonstrate ethical approval as connected to connected to connected to skills in reflective practice, appropriate (A5, K6, V3) implementing solutions to implementing solutions to implementing solutions to connected to problems in practice problems in practice problems in practice implementing solutions to problems in practice
SSRI Assessment Criteria Work of a distinctive standard (70%/+) Work at a meritable standard (60-69%) Work of a passing standard (50-59%) Work not of a passing standard (below 50%) Evidence of integration of concepts and theoretical perspectives of research and reflective academic practice in design and implementation of the project, aligned to the UKPSF (A5, V3) Explicit and extensive evidence is shown of critically evaluating the relevant concepts and theoretical perspectives of research and reflective practice for the project with clarity in alignment to the UKPSF Good evidence is shown of critically evaluating the relevant concepts and theoretical perspectives of research and reflective practice for the project, with alignment to the UKPSF Some evidence is shown of critically evaluating the relevant concepts and theoretical perspectives of research and reflective practice for the project, and/or with limited alignment to the UKPSF Evidence of critically evaluating the concepts and theoretical perspectives of research and reflective practice is highly limited or lacking. Limited or lacking alignment to the UKPSF Evidence of recent, current and ongoing engagement in critically reflective practice through design, development and engagement in academic practice and in evaluation of outcomes achieved (all aspects of Descriptor 2) The participant has cogently and critically reviewed their an aspect of their current academic practice and evaluated the outcomes achieved The participant has critically and evaluated the outcomes achieved in relation to their current /ongoing academic practice The participant has undertaken the review and evaluation of outcomes achieved in relation to their current /ongoing academic practice, but in a more limited manner The participant has shown little or no evidence of critical review and evaluation of the outcomes achieved in relation to their current/ongoing academic practice Evidence of ability to work on problems of professional practice including in gaining ethical approval as appropriate (A5, K6, V3) The participant is able to demonstrate advanced skills in reflective practice, connected to implementing solutions to problems in practice The participant is able to demonstrate good skills in reflective practice, connected to implementing solutions to problems in practice The participant is able to demonstrate some skill in reflective practice, connected to implementing solutions to problems in practice The participant shows limited demonstration of, or neglect to demonstrate skills in reflective practice, connected to implementing solutions to problems in practice
PGCAP%20Handbook%202019-2020.docx