Zoning information contained in this layer is correct as of 15 February 2015 PORTSLZN_20131022.shp DPE SEPP_Huntlee_LZN.shp DPE TOMAGO.shp DPE Inverstigation areas URA_Option_1_and_2.shp OEH Other development LMCC_Agricultural_Land_v1_region.shp HCCREMS TYPE = “Constrained (potential urban growth or plans conservation)” AND not overlapping with (‘proposed_awaba_reserve_region.shp’ | ‘Proposed_Coastal_Wetland_region.shp’) lh_proposed_urban_land.shp DotE FutureResidentialAreas.shp HCCREMS Urban Release Area_LHRS_region.shp HCCREMS ps_plgstrategy2011_growthareas.shp HCCREMS Urban_Settlement_2011_region.shp HCCREMS ProposedDevelopmentv2.shp HCCREMS 2: Expressway newFreewayCentreline.shp HCCREMS 3: Important Agricultural Allagg1.shp HCCREMS Built from the following IAL layers: Broad Acre Areas Agriculture, Cultivated Turf and Viticulture 4: Cumulative LEPS, Growth Areas, Future Development, Expressway, Important As defined above development Agricultural Areas and Small vegetation fragments 5: Mining titles coal_titles.shp UoM Appendix 7. Predicted proportion of each biodiversity feature’s LHSA distribution predicted to be lost under each development scenario. Table 19. The proportion of the LHSA distributions of 40 amphibian species predicted to be lost under each of the development scenarios. The scenarios are described in Chapter 5, with the impacts listed under the Urban scenario cumulative across its components.
Zoning information contained in this layer is correct as of 15 February 2015 PORTSLZN_20131022.shp DPE SEPP_Huntlee_LZN.shp DPE TOMAGO.shp DPE Inverstigation areas URA_Option_1_and_2.shp OEH Other development plans LMCC_Agricultural_Land_v1_region.shp HCCREMS TYPE = “Constrained (potential urban growth or conservation)” AND not overlapping with (‘proposed_awaba_reserve_region.shp’ | ‘Proposed_Coastal_Wetland_region.shp’) lh_proposed_urban_land.shp FutureResidentialAreas.shp Urban Release Area_LHRS_region.shp ps_plgstrategy2011_growthareas.shp Urban_Settlement_2011_region.shp DotE HCCREMS HCCREMS HCCREMS HCCREMS ProposedDevelopmentv2.shp HCCREMS 2: Expressway newFreewayCentreline.shp HCCREMS 3: Important Agricultural Areas Allagg1.shp HCCREMS Built from the following IAL layers: Broad Acre Agriculture, Cultivated Turf and Viticulture 4: Cumulative development LEPS, Growth Areas, Future Development, Expressway, Important Agricultural Areas and Small vegetation fragments As defined above 5: Mining titles coal_titles.shp UoM Appendix 7. Predicted proportion of each biodiversity feature’s LHSA distribution predicted to be lost under each development scenario. Table 19. The proportion of the LHSA distributions of 40 amphibian species predicted to be lost under each of the development scenarios. The scenarios are described in Chapter 5, with the impacts listed under the Urban scenario cumulative across its components.
identifying-conservation-priorities-appendices.docx