Individual Expertise Discussion Leading Grading Name: ___________________________________ Topic: ____________________________________ Component Weak (0) Poor (1) Good (1.8) Excellent (2.5) Background information on topic Integration of topic with issues of social justice Awareness and/or discussion of topic with relation to issues of rhetoric and ethics Integration of day’s reading into discussion Preparation for leading class in Discussion (handouts, slides, prepared questions and/or activities, etc.) Total General Comments Explanation of rubric Excellent: Information presented is clear, accurate, and specific. Examples are presented from both primary and secondary sources, where appropriate. Good: Information presented is clear, accurate and fairly specific. Some examples from both primary and secondary sources are given, where appropriate. Fair: Information is presented in general terms. Examples from primary and secondary sources are sporadic, or sources may not be wholly appropriate. Poor: Presented information clarity. Examples may be lacking or wholly absent. The design project is discussed in only general terms.
Individual Expertise Discussion Leading Grading Name: ___________________________________ Topic: ____________________________________ Component Weak (0) Poor (1) Good (1.8) Excellent (2.5) Background information on topic Integration of topic with issues of social justice Awareness and/or discussion of topic with relation to issues of rhetoric and ethics Integration of day’s reading into discussion Preparation for leading class in Discussion (handouts, slides, prepared questions and/or activities, etc.) Total Explanation of rubric Excellent: Information presented is clear, accurate, and specific. Examples are presented from both primary and secondary sources, where appropriate. Good: Information presented is clear, accurate and fairly specific. Some examples from both primary and secondary sources are given, where appropriate. Fair: Information is presented in general terms. Examples from primary and secondary sources are sporadic, or sources may not be wholly appropriate. Poor: Presented information clarity. Examples may be lacking or wholly absent. The design project is discussed in only general terms. General Comments
Individual_Expertise_Rubric.docx