Scholarships – Philippines 01/01/2010 – 2011 5 4 3 5 4 5 31/12/2013 $13 630 000 2012 5 5 4 4 4 4 AusAID The Asia Foundation Partnership Philippines 01/07/2011 – 2011 5 3 3 4 3 4 30/06/2020 Building Disaster Resilience of $27 054 399 2012 6 5 4 5 5 6 Manila Communities* 14/01/2010 – 30/06/2019 Basic Education Sector $207 215 811 2012 6 5 6 4 5 6 Transformation Program* 01/07/2010 Strengthening Public Private $26 277 692 2012 6 5 4 5 5 5 Partnership Program* 22/03/2011 – 30/06/2014 $18 000 000 2012 6 5 5 5 5 5 Public Financial Management Program* 01/07/2011 – 30/06/2016 Classroom Construction $45 500 000 2012 6 5 5 4 5 5 Initiative* 15/12/2011 – 30/06/2015 Definitions of rating scale: Satisfactory (4, 5 and 6) = 6 = Very high quality (needs ongoing management and monitoring only) = 5 = Good quality (needs minor work to improve in some areas) = 4 = Adequate quality, needs some work Less than satisfactory (1, 2 and 3) = 3 = Less than adequate quality; needs significant work (needs work to improve in core areas) = 2 = Poor quality; needs major work to improve = 1 = Very poor quality; needs major overhaul * First QAI in 2012
Scholarships – Philippines 01/01/2010 – 31/12/2013 2011 5 4 3 5 4 5 AusAID The Asia Foundation Partnership Philippines $13 630 000 2012 5 5 4 4 4 4 01/07/2011 – 30/06/2020 2011 5 3 3 4 3 4 Building Disaster Resilience of Manila Communities* $27 054 399 14/01/2010 – 30/06/2019 2012 6 5 4 5 5 6 Basic Education Sector Transformation Program* $207 215 811 01/07/2010 2012 6 5 6 4 5 6 Strengthening Public Private Partnership Program* $26 277 692 22/03/2011 – 30/06/2014 2012 6 5 4 5 5 5 Public Financial Management Program* $18 000 000 01/07/2011 – 30/06/2016 2012 6 5 5 5 5 5 Classroom Construction Initiative* $45 500 000 15/12/2011 – 30/06/2015 2012 6 5 5 4 5 5 Definitions of rating scale: Satisfactory (4, 5 and 6) = 6 = Very high quality (needs ongoing management and monitoring only) = 5 = Good quality (needs minor work to improve in some areas) = 4 = Adequate quality, needs some work Less than satisfactory (1, 2 and 3) = 3 = Less than adequate quality; needs significant work (needs work to improve in core areas) = 2 = Poor quality; needs major work to improve = 1 = Very poor quality; needs major overhaul * First QAI in 2012
philippines-appr-2012-13.docx