PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM Presenter: Date: PRESENTATION STYLE Unacceptable Needs Average Very Good Excellent Work Overall effectiveness of 1 2 3 4 5 delivery (Well-practiced, engaging, etc) Presenter spoke clearly with 1 2 3 4 5 correct speed, cadence, and volume Presentation fit within time 1 2 3 4 5 Allotted (13-15 min) Professionalism of 1 2 3 4 5 presentation and Presenter’s demeanor Comments AUDIO/VISUAL Unacceptable Needs Average Very Good Excellent Work Appropriate use of slides 1 2 3 4 5 (number of slides, time on each slide,etc.) Quality of text slides (legible, 1 2 3 4 5 enhance verbal portion, etc) Quality of graphs, tables, 1 2 3 4 5 images Comments CONTENT Unacceptable Needs Average Very Good Excellent Work Presentation was well 1 2 3 4 5 organized and easy to follow Clarity and progression of 1 2 3 4 5 ideas Appropriate integration of 1 2 3 4 5 scientific data/background If applicable: Hypotheses 1 2 3 4 5 were clearly stated Study design and setting were 1 2 3 4 5 clearly stated and accurate Depth of explanation / 1 2 3 4 5 educational content was appropriate Explanation of statistical 1 2 3 4 5 design was appropriate Overall educational value 1 2 3 4 5 Comments
PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM Presenter: Date: PRESENTATION STYLE Unacceptable Needs Work Average Very Good Excellent Overall effectiveness of delivery (Well-practiced, engaging, etc) 1 2 3 4 5 Presenter spoke clearly with correct speed, cadence, and volume 1 2 3 4 5 Presentation fit within time Allotted (13-15 min) 1 2 3 4 5 Professionalism of presentation and Presenter’s demeanor 1 2 3 4 5 Comments AUDIO/VISUAL Unacceptable Needs Work Average Very Good Excellent Appropriate use of slides (number of slides, time on each slide,etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 Quality of text slides (legible, enhance verbal portion, etc) 1 2 3 4 5 Quality of graphs, tables, images 1 2 3 4 5 Comments CONTENT Unacceptable Needs Work Average Very Good Excellent Presentation was well organized and easy to follow 1 2 3 4 5 Clarity and progression of ideas 1 2 3 4 5 Appropriate integration of scientific data/background 1 2 3 4 5 If applicable: Hypotheses were clearly stated 1 2 3 4 5 Study design and setting were clearly stated and accurate 1 2 3 4 5 Depth of explanation / educational content was appropriate 1 2 3 4 5 Explanation of statistical design was appropriate 1 2 3 4 5 Overall educational value 1 2 3 4 5 Comments
PHC6003-syllabus.docx