Chipman et al., May 47oN 20oW Euphotic Zone 11 0.84 (0.19) (1993)55 Marra et al., June 59.5oN Euphotic Zone 4 1 (0.46) (1995)56 21oW Savidge et al., 47-60oN Euphotic Zone 25 0.70 (0.32) May/June (1995)57 20oW Bury et al., May 47oN 20oW Euphotic Zone 8 0.84 (0.50) (2001)58 Painter et al., July 49oN 16oW Euphotic Zone 3 0.55 (0.22) (2010)25 Table 1: Mean productivity rates from the NE Atlantic as reported in the literature. All estimates were made using the 13C stable isotope method. Figures Figure 1: Flow diagram explaining the steps needed to be taken to calibrate and subsequently calculate primary production from a glider.
Chipman et al., May (1993)55 47oN 20oW Euphotic Zone 11 0.84 (0.19) Marra et al., June (1995)56 59.5oN 21oW Euphotic Zone 4 1 (0.46) Savidge et al., May/June (1995)57 47-60oN 20oW Euphotic Zone 25 0.70 (0.32) Bury et al., May (2001)58 47oN 20oW Euphotic Zone 8 0.84 (0.50) Painter et al., July (2010)25 49oN 16oW Euphotic Zone 3 0.55 (0.22) Table 1: Mean productivity rates from the NE Atlantic as reported in the literature. All estimates were made using the 13C stable isotope method. Figures Figure 1: Flow diagram explaining the steps needed to be taken to calibrate and subsequently calculate primary production from a glider.
hemsley_paper_final_revision_changed.docx