strengthened institutions at the national level (including MoUD, MoFALD, and TDF) as well as the participating municipalities. This approach enabled scaling up or evolving to wider replication of programs built on strengthened policies and institutions at both national and local levels. 7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners (a) Borrower/implementing agencies Annex 7 provides a summary of the The report is well prepared and draws borrower’s ICR. on strong evidence-based facts based on independent reviews at the ICR stage. There were several issues were identified by the borrower during interactions with implementing agencies, municipalities, and stakeholders, which are very useful in informing project design of other similar projects in the future. (b) Cofinanciers Not Applicable. (c) Other partners and stakeholders Not Applicable. Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing Revised Appraisal Percentage Estimate at Actual Percentage Estimate at Components Restructuring (US$ m) of Revised (US$ m) Appraisal (US$ m) (IDA) (% of IDA) (IDA) (% of IDA) (IDA) Component 1: Block 20 41 5.00 4.43 4.73 Grants Component 2: Municipal 65 39 16.37 5.10 4.59 sub-projects Component 3: 15 20 3.63 3.38 2.34 Institutional Development Total Baseline Cost 25.00 12.90 11.66 Physical Contingencies Price Contingencies 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Project Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 Front-end fee PPF Front-end fee IBRD Total Financing Required 25.00 12.90 11.66 (b) Financing Appraisal Actual/Latest Type of Estimate Estimate Percentage of Source of Funds Cofinancing (USD (USD Appraisal millions) millions) Borrower 5.00 0.00 0 Local Communities/Municipalities 2.13 1.78 83.57 GERMANY: GTZ 3.00 2.66 88.67
strengthened institutions at the national level (including MoUD, MoFALD, and TDF) as well as the participating municipalities. This approach enabled scaling up or evolving to wider replication of programs built on strengthened policies and institutions at both national and local levels. 7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners (a) Borrower/implementing agencies Annex 7 provides a summary of the borrower’s ICR. The report is well prepared and draws on strong evidence-based facts based on independent reviews at the ICR stage. There were several issues were identified by the borrower during interactions with implementing agencies, municipalities, and stakeholders, which are very useful in informing project design of other similar projects in the future. (b) Cofinanciers Not Applicable. (c) Other partners and stakeholders Not Applicable. Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing Components Appraisal Estimate (US$ m) (IDA) Revised Estimate at Restructuring (US$ m) (IDA) Actual (US$ m) (IDA) Percentage at Appraisal (% of IDA) Percentage of Revised (% of IDA) Component 1: Block Grants 5.00 4.43 4.73 20 41 Component 2: Municipal sub-projects 16.37 5.10 4.59 65 39 Component 3: Institutional Development 3.63 3.38 2.34 15 20 Total Baseline Cost 25.00 12.90 11.66 Physical Contingencies Price Contingencies 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Project Costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 Front-end fee PPF Front-end fee IBRD Total Financing Required 25.00 12.90 11.66 (b) Financing Source of Funds Type of Cofinancing Appraisal Estimate (USD millions) Actual/Latest Estimate (USD millions) Percentage of Appraisal Borrower 5.00 0.00 0 Local Communities/Municipalities 2.13 1.78 83.57 GERMANY: GTZ 3.00 2.66 88.67
ICR-Main-Document-P120265-2017-07-31-09-09-08112017.docx