28. Individuals working with Individuals interact in limited way and sometimes Historically there were some examples 1 transboundary cooperation for snow in teams but this is rarely effective and functional; of such collaboration but they have not leopard ecosystems work been sustained. Individuals interact regularly and form teams, but 0 2 effectively together as a team this is not always fully effective or functional; Individuals interact effectively and form 3 functional teams 5. Capacity to monitor, 29. Policy is continually reviewed There is no policy or it is old and not reviewed GSLEP policy has been developed but 0 evaluate, report and learn and updated regularly; no reviews have yet taken place. about Policy is only reviewed at irregular intervals; 1 1 transboundary snow Policy is reviewed regularly but not annually; 2 leopard ecosystems; National offsets policy is reviewed annually 3 30. Society monitors the state of There is no dialogue at all; 0 Society will only be involved in transboundary snow leopard implementation process on the national There is some dialogue going on, but not in the 1 ecosystems and local levels wider public and restricted to specialized circles; There is a reasonably open public dialogue going 0 2 on but certain issues remain taboo; There is an open and transparent public dialogue about the state of the Transboundary snow leopard 3 ecosystems 31. Transboundary cooperation for Institutions resist change; 0 Institutions are responding slowly to snow leopard ecosystems changes in policy at national level. Institutions do change but only very slowly; 1 institutions are highly adaptive, Institutions tend to adapt in response to change but 1 2 responding effectively and not always very effectively or with some delay; immediately to change Institutions are highly adaptive, responding 3 effectively and immediately to change 32. Transboundary cooperation for There are no mechanisms for monitoring, Transboundary mechanisms do not yet 0 snow leopard ecosystems evaluation, reporting or learning; exist, so there is no M&E. institutions have effective internal There are some mechanisms for monitoring, mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, reporting and learning but they are 1 evaluation, reporting and learning limited and weak; 0 Reasonable mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, reporting and learning are in place but 2 are not as strong or comprehensive as they could be; Institutions have effective internal mechanisms for 3 monitoring, evaluation, reporting and learning
28. Individuals working with transboundary cooperation for snow leopard ecosystems work effectively together as a team 0 Historically there were some examples of such collaboration but they have not been sustained. Individuals interact in limited way and sometimes in teams but this is rarely effective and functional; 1 Individuals interact regularly and form teams, but this is not always fully effective or functional; 2 Individuals interact effectively and form functional teams 3 5. Capacity to monitor, evaluate, report and learn about transboundary snow leopard ecosystems; 29. Policy is continually reviewed and updated There is no policy or it is old and not reviewed regularly; 0 1 GSLEP policy has been developed but no reviews have yet taken place. Policy is only reviewed at irregular intervals; 1 Policy is reviewed regularly but not annually; 2 National offsets policy is reviewed annually 3 30. Society monitors the state of transboundary snow leopard ecosystems There is no dialogue at all; 0 0 Society will only be involved in implementation process on the national and local levels There is some dialogue going on, but not in the wider public and restricted to specialized circles; 1 There is a reasonably open public dialogue going on but certain issues remain taboo; 2 There is an open and transparent public dialogue about the state of the Transboundary snow leopard ecosystems 3 31. Transboundary cooperation for snow leopard ecosystems institutions are highly adaptive, responding effectively and immediately to change Institutions resist change; 0 1 Institutions are responding slowly to changes in policy at national level. Institutions do change but only very slowly; 1 Institutions tend to adapt in response to change but not always very effectively or with some delay; 2 Institutions are highly adaptive, responding effectively and immediately to change 3 32. Transboundary cooperation for snow leopard ecosystems institutions have effective internal mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, reporting and learning There are no mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, reporting or learning; 0 0 Transboundary mechanisms do not yet exist, so there is no M&E. There are some mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, reporting and learning but they are limited and weak; 1 Reasonable mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, reporting and learning are in place but are not as strong or comprehensive as they could be; 2 Institutions have effective internal mechanisms for monitoring, evaluation, reporting and learning 3
PIMS_5413_BD_Snow_Leopard_Prodoc__final_3Jun16.docx