important for the As far as I understood from all of you, there wasn't a real transparency but can be Government, but it requires consultation. The plan does mention comments made by civil reasonably expected. It is transparency from the civil society (and what they did with them) and very explicitly an actual risk that an organizations, and elaborated mentions Kmonitor and TI as coimplementors of some of the organization’s budget that NGOs should not only commitments. Were you aware of that? management is unlawful account for where their Best and the financial and money comes from, but also Paul material resources of the for their leaders’ personal organization are used assets. Paul unlawfully and without Maassen authorization. Director, Civil Society Engagement Organizations like this Open Government Partnership Support Unit are non-transparent not ------ just for third parties, but for its members and Forwarded employees as well. message From: xxxxxxxx <xxxxxxxx@kmonitor.hu> Similar abuses were Date: 24 August 2015 at 12:30 revealed recently not Subject: Re: New Hungary plan online only in connection with To: Paul Maassen <paul.maassen@opengovpartnership.org> organizations receiving grants from the Norway Hi Paul, Fund and caused a As xxxxxxxx said, we did not participate in the process, since the significant loss of public government did not give any answer on our request to reopen the trust. debate on the FOI Act. There was a meeting in January I guess, where we evaluated the previous action plan, and recommended the ability to exert “Using to keep some of the unfulfilled commitments for the second AP. I pressure in order to gain guess these are those, where they mentioned us. undue advantage or benefits is another I heard that the government received a letter from OGP and has problem that exist in just drafted its response. Could you share the letter from OGP Hungary as well as with us, or at least give some infos on its content? internationally and is Thank you, best, considerably harder to xxxxxxxx detect than infringements related to
important for the Government, but it requires transparency from the civil organizations, and elaborated that NGOs should not only account for where their money comes from, but also for their leaders’ personal assets. As far as I understood from all of you, there wasn't a real consultation. The plan does mention comments made by civil society (and what they did with them) and very explicitly mentions Kmonitor and TI as coimplementors of some of the commitments. Were you aware of that? Best Paul Paul Maassen Director, Civil Society Engagement Open Government Partnership Support Unit ------ Forwarded message From: xxxxxxxx <xxxxxxxx@kmonitor.hu> Date: 24 August 2015 at 12:30 Subject: Re: New Hungary plan online To: Paul Maassen <paul.maassen@opengovpartnership.org> Hi Paul, As xxxxxxxx said, we did not participate in the process, since the government did not give any answer on our request to reopen the debate on the FOI Act. There was a meeting in January I guess, where we evaluated the previous action plan, and recommended to keep some of the unfulfilled commitments for the second AP. I guess these are those, where they mentioned us. I heard that the government received a letter from OGP and has just drafted its response. Could you share the letter from OGP with us, or at least give some infos on its content? Thank you, best, xxxxxxxx transparency but can be reasonably expected. It is an actual risk that an organization’s budget management is unlawful and the financial and material resources of the organization are used unlawfully and without authorization. Organizations like this are non-transparent not just for third parties, but for its members and employees as well. Similar abuses were revealed recently not only in connection with organizations receiving grants from the Norway Fund and caused a significant loss of public trust. “Using the ability to exert pressure in order to gain undue advantage or benefits is another problem that exist in Hungary as well as internationally and is considerably harder to detect than infringements related to
Hungary%20Review%20Team%20Report%20Final.docx