Table 5: Gloucester Public Schools Science CPI by Subgroup 2012–2015 4- Year Above/Below Group 2012 2013 2014 2015 Trend State 2015 District 77.7 77.2 78.7 76.4 -1.3 All students -3.0 State 78.6 79.0 79.6 79.4 0.8 District 67.7 68.6 69.2 65.1 -2.6 High Needs -1.2 State 65.0 66.4 67.3 66.3 1.3 District -- -- -- 65.5 -- Economically -1.6 Disadvantaged State -- -- -- 67.1 -- District -- -- -- -- -- ELL and former -- ELL students State 51.4 54.0 54.0 53.9 2.5 District 58.8 60.4 61.8 57.5 -1.3 Students with -2.7 disabilities State 58.7 59.8 60.1 60.2 1.5 In 2015 the district reached its 2015 CPI target in math for English language learners; between 2014 and 2015 its CPI improved but remained below target for all students, high needs students, and students with disabilities in ELA and math. Table 6: Gloucester Public Schools 2015 CPI and Targets by Subgroup ELA Math Science 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 Group Rating Rating Rating CPI Target CPI Target CPI Target Improved Improved No All students 87.7 91.3 Below 80.8 83.7 Below 76.4 84.2 Change Target Target Improved Improved High Needs 79.9 86.1 Below 70.9 76.4 Below 65.1 78.4 Declined Target Target Economically 82.7 -- -- 73.2 -- -- 65.5 -- -- Disadvantaged Improved ELLs 73.5 82.1 Below 70.1 71.0 On Target -- -- -- Target Improved Improved Students with 69.9 78.9 Below 62.2 69.9 Below 57.5 72.7 Declined disabilities Target Target Students’ growth in ELA and math was high compared to their academic peers statewide for English language learners and moderate for all students, high needs students, and students with disabilities. Table 7: Gloucester Public Schools 2015 Median ELA and Math SGP by Subgroup Median ELA SGP Median Math SGP Group District State Growth Level District State Growth Level All students 51.0 50.0 Moderate 54.0 50.0 Moderate
Table 5: Gloucester Public Schools Science CPI by Subgroup 2012–2015 Group 2012 2013 2014 2015 4- Year Trend Above/Below State 2015 All students District 77.7 77.2 78.7 76.4 -1.3 -3.0 State 78.6 79.0 79.6 79.4 0.8 High Needs District 67.7 68.6 69.2 65.1 -2.6 -1.2 State 65.0 66.4 67.3 66.3 1.3 Economically Disadvantaged District -- -- -- 65.5 -- -1.6 State -- -- -- 67.1 -- ELL and former ELL students District -- -- -- -- -- -- State 51.4 54.0 54.0 53.9 2.5 Students with disabilities District 58.8 60.4 61.8 57.5 -1.3 -2.7 State 58.7 59.8 60.1 60.2 1.5 In 2015 the district reached its 2015 CPI target in math for English language learners; between 2014 and 2015 its CPI improved but remained below target for all students, high needs students, and students with disabilities in ELA and math. Table 6: Gloucester Public Schools 2015 CPI and Targets by Subgroup ELA Math Science Group 2015 CPI 2015 Target Rating 2015 CPI 2015 Target Rating 2015 CPI 2015 Target Rating All students 87.7 91.3 Improved Below Target 80.8 83.7 Improved Below Target 76.4 84.2 No Change High Needs 79.9 86.1 Improved Below Target 70.9 76.4 Improved Below Target 65.1 78.4 Declined Economically Disadvantaged 82.7 -- -- 73.2 -- -- 65.5 -- -- ELLs 73.5 82.1 Improved Below Target 70.1 71.0 On Target -- -- -- Students with disabilities 69.9 78.9 Improved Below Target 62.2 69.9 Improved Below Target 57.5 72.7 Declined Students’ growth in ELA and math was high compared to their academic peers statewide for English language learners and moderate for all students, high needs students, and students with disabilities. Table 7: Gloucester Public Schools 2015 Median ELA and Math SGP by Subgroup Group Median ELA SGP Median Math SGP District State Growth Level District State Growth Level All students 51.0 50.0 Moderate 54.0 50.0 Moderate
gloucester-public-schools-district-review-report-2016.docx