integrated with and supportive of the evaluation system is adequate procedural and are reviewed for possible district initiatives and strategic integrated with strategic safeguards and are reviewed bias to assure that all educators plan. Data is used to develop a planning, professional learning, for possible bias to assure that are treated fairly throughout the coherent approach to educator and continuous improvement. all educators are treated fairly evaluation process. quality, professional learning throughout the evaluation and continuous improvement. process. The evaluation integrates district initiatives and educator The evaluation system includes evaluation through common a general approach for performance goals (e.g., integrating district initiatives and school-wide, educator evaluation, but the to assure that educators specifics may not be systemic. develop and contribute to attaining district goals. Guiding Questions 1.9: How does the district collect and analyze feedback on implementation of the evaluation and support system? What is the district’s collaborative process for monitoring and improving the evaluation and support system? What is the process to identify, review and evaluate data to measure and improve the effectiveness of the district’s evaluation system? What is the process for making recommendations for revisions to the system based upon this review? What procedural safeguards (e.g., appeals, inquiry process, evaluator criteria) are included in the system to assure educators are treated fairly in the evaluation process? CRITERIA 2: District evaluation and support systems emphasize professional growth and continuous improvement of educators’ professional practice to enhance student performance. These systems provide quality assurance of all educators and differentiate evaluation processes based upon level of experience, job assignment, and information. INDICATOR Insufficient Progressing Sufficient Evidence T2.1 Educator evaluation There is little or no evidence The majority of informal and All informal and formal systems establish a that informal and formal formal evaluation activities yield evaluation activities yield continuous process that evaluation activities yield detailed feedback and this detailed feedback and this includes the collection and detailed feedback that is used feedback is used to inform feedback is used to inform analysis of information about to inform recommendations for recommendations for recommendations for an educator’s performance, professional growth. professional growth. professional growth. the establishment of individual goals for There is little or no written Written feedback is provided, but Written feedback is provided and
integrated with and supportive of district initiatives and strategic plan. Data is used to develop a coherent approach to educator quality, professional learning and continuous improvement. the evaluation system is integrated with strategic planning, professional learning, and continuous improvement. adequate procedural safeguards and are reviewed for possible bias to assure that all educators are treated fairly throughout the evaluation process. The evaluation system includes a general approach for integrating district initiatives and educator evaluation, but the specifics may not be systemic. and are reviewed for possible bias to assure that all educators are treated fairly throughout the evaluation process. The evaluation integrates district initiatives and educator evaluation through common performance goals (e.g., school-wide, to assure that educators develop and contribute to attaining district goals. Guiding Questions 1.9: How does the district collect and analyze feedback on implementation of the evaluation and support system? What is the district’s collaborative process for monitoring and improving the evaluation and support system? What is the process to identify, review and evaluate data to measure and improve the effectiveness of the district’s evaluation system? What is the process for making recommendations for revisions to the system based upon this review? What procedural safeguards (e.g., appeals, inquiry process, evaluator criteria) are included in the system to assure educators are treated fairly in the evaluation process? CRITERIA 2: District evaluation and support systems emphasize professional growth and continuous improvement of educators’ professional practice to enhance student performance. These systems provide quality assurance of all educators and differentiate evaluation processes based upon level of experience, job assignment, and information. INDICATOR Insufficient Progressing Sufficient Evidence T2.1 Educator evaluation systems establish a continuous process that includes the collection and analysis of information about an educator’s performance, the establishment of individual goals for There is little or no evidence that informal and formal evaluation activities yield detailed feedback that is used to inform recommendations for professional growth. There is little or no written The majority of informal and formal evaluation activities yield detailed feedback and this feedback is used to inform recommendations for professional growth. Written feedback is provided, but All informal and formal evaluation activities yield detailed feedback and this feedback is used to inform recommendations for professional growth. Written feedback is provided and
final-self-appraisal-tool.docx