-The scene is clear when I can go in. -In the scene it is easy to get around. Legibility -In the scene, it take much time to figure out a way of moving doesn’t around. -In the scene I can always figure out where I am. - Component are well related to each other. -Components work well together. Coherence - Component seem to hang together. - Components help each other to provide better comprehension. -The scene has too many distractions, making it confusing. -The scene contain enough components to interest me. doesn’t Complexity -The scene contains a good variety of components that keep me involved. -I feel drawn in by the variety of information or components the scene offers. -The scene makes me feel there is something interesting to explore. -As I navigate through the scene, more curiosity inspires me. Mystery -I expect that the scene will provide interesting thing to involve my curiosity as I explore around. -I feel I will find interesting things if I navigate more. -The scene has a wide and unimpeded view. Prospect -In the scene I could easily see what is going on around. Refuge -It offers opportunity for protection from other glances. people’s Source: (Lee & Kozar, 2009; Mumcu et al., 2010; Ramanujam, 2007) Table 4. Mean Description of Visual Preferences Items Mean* SD Scenes’ Predominant Cronbach’s Contents Alpha Tree shade, uncertain paths, Shrub, Height of trees, 1.72 .65 .75 Mystery Green dominant color, Layered spaces, Irregular combination of natural component, Dense plant spaces Coherence Clear trails, Rows of trees, Grass, open spaces, 1.89 .67 .71 Flowering, Integration between green spaces, Integration between manmade elements and greenery, Small amount of shade Refuge Tree shade, grass, Large amount of green space, 1.89 .75 .78 closed environment Domination of manmade elements, Crossroads, Low shade, Various combinations of natural and 2.14 .84 .81 Complexity manmade components, Accessibility to green surfaces; Availability of hard ground and pavements, Shape geometry differences Clear focal points, Open spaces, Pavement, Low amount of shade; Availability of simple or multiple 2.49 .86 .81 Legibility orientations, Recognizable texture
Legibility -The scene is clear when I can go in. -In the scene it is easy to get around. -In the scene, it doesn’t take much time to figure out a way of moving around. -In the scene I can always figure out where I am. Coherence - Component are well related to each other. -Components work well together. - Component seem to hang together. - Components help each other to provide better comprehension. Complexity -The scene has too many distractions, making it confusing. -The scene doesn’t contain enough components to interest me. -The scene contains a good variety of components that keep me involved. -I feel drawn in by the variety of information or components the scene offers. Mystery -The scene makes me feel there is something interesting to explore. -As I navigate through the scene, more curiosity inspires me. -I expect that the scene will provide interesting thing to involve my curiosity as I explore around. -I feel I will find interesting things if I navigate more. Prospect -The scene has a wide and unimpeded view. -In the scene I could easily see what is going on around. Refuge -It offers opportunity for protection from other people’s glances. Source: (Lee & Kozar, 2009; Mumcu et al., 2010; Ramanujam, 2007) Table 4. Mean Description of Visual Preferences Items Scenes’ Predominant Contents Mean* SD Cronbach’s Alpha Mystery Tree shade, uncertain paths, Shrub, Height of trees, Green dominant color, Layered spaces, Irregular combination of natural component, Dense plant spaces 1.72 .65 .75 Coherence Clear trails, Rows of trees, Grass, open spaces, Flowering, Integration between green spaces, Integration between manmade elements and greenery, Small amount of shade 1.89 .67 .71 Refuge Tree shade, grass, Large amount of green space, closed environment 1.89 .75 .78 Complexity Domination of manmade elements, Crossroads, Low shade, Various combinations of natural and manmade components, Accessibility to green surfaces; Availability of hard ground and pavements, Shape geometry differences 2.14 .84 .81 Legibility Clear focal points, Open spaces, Pavement, Low amount of shade; Availability of simple or multiple orientations, Recognizable texture 2.49 .86 .81
habibshahhoseini-A-11-774-1-f2a77ce.docx