Relevance How well has the Please consider the degree to RADIO BUTTONS: 5 Proactive: Exceptionally responsive and – application kept up with which functional agile; functional enhancements and process change? enhancements have been met needs are proactively addressed; preempts Label: “5 – in a timely manner, relative to industry/market changes. Value: 5 Proactive”, the number of change requests. Additional indicators 3 Relevant: Remains relevant and has – Label: Very “4 – include relevance to efficiently kept up with changing business Value: 4 Relevant”, industry/market best requirements, process needs and practices, processes, and industry/market capabilities. 2 capabilities, and management Label: “3 – attention and interest in Value: 3 Relevant”, 1 Irrelevant: Functionality and processes are – keeping the application out of date; significant enhancements are relevant. Label: Somewhat “2 – backlogged or require substantial time and Value: 2 Relevant”, effort to implement. Label: “1 – Value: 1 Irrelevant”, Complexity To what extent is the Please consider whether this RADIO BUTTONS: 5 - Very Simple: Simple to use, little to no application is difficult to use, training to learn, and/or does not require functionality application’s requires specialized expertise, specialized resources to manage or to get complex, requiring Label: Very “5 – experience and resources needs significant training, or changes completed. Value: 5 Simple”, to learn, use and requires substantial overhead manage? to manage changes, 3 Reasonable: Reasonable training and – Label: Value: “4 – Simple”, interfaces, and reports. expertise to use, some expected attention is 4 required to manage changes, interfaces, and 3 reports. Label: “3 – Value: 3 Reasonable”, 1 Very Complex: Difficult to use, very – complex, requires significant training and highly Label: “2 – specialized resources, significant overhead 2 Value: Complex”, manage changes, interfaces, and reports. Label: Very “1 – Value: 1 Complex”,
2 Relevance How well has the application kept up with change? Please consider the degree to which functional enhancements have been met in a timely manner, relative to the number of change requests. Additional indicators include relevance to industry/market best practices, processes, and capabilities, and management attention and interest in keeping the application relevant. RADIO BUTTONS: Label: “5 – Proactive”, Value: 5 Label: “4 – Very Relevant”, Value: 4 Label: “3 – Relevant”, Value: 3 Label: “2 – Somewhat Relevant”, Value: 2 Label: “1 – Irrelevant”, Value: 1 5 – Proactive: Exceptionally responsive and agile; functional enhancements and process needs are proactively addressed; preempts industry/market changes. 3 – Relevant: Remains relevant and has efficiently kept up with changing business requirements, process needs and industry/market capabilities. 1 – Irrelevant: Functionality and processes are out of date; significant enhancements are backlogged or require substantial time and effort to implement. 3 Complexity To what extent is the application’s functionality complex, requiring experience and resources to learn, use and manage? Please consider whether this application is difficult to use, requires specialized expertise, needs significant training, or requires substantial overhead to manage changes, interfaces, and reports. RADIO BUTTONS: Label: “5 – Very Simple”, Value: 5 Label: “4 – Simple”, Value: 4 Label: “3 – Reasonable”, Value: 3 Label: “2 – Complex”, Value: 2 Label: “1 – Very Complex”, Value: 1 5 - Very Simple: Simple to use, little to no training to learn, and/or does not require specialized resources to manage or to get changes completed. 3 – Reasonable: Reasonable training and expertise to use, some expected attention is required to manage changes, interfaces, and reports. 1 – Very Complex: Difficult to use, very complex, requires significant training and highly specialized resources, significant overhead manage changes, interfaces, and reports.
FY%2018%20Application%20Portfolio%20Management%20Assessment%20and%20Validation%20Instructions.docx