3 2 1 0 Comments: strong / thorough response average / partial response weak / minimal response not addressed (2A) Describe the process for garnering input from family and community stakeholders. Family and community Family and community Family and community No action was taken to stakeholders were stakeholders were stakeholders were made engage family and educated on the current provided opportunities for aware of the LEA’s intent community stakeholders. report card ratings, current dialogue and feedback to engage in the SIG improvement efforts (CAP, with school leadership or process on behalf of the Priorities, etc.) AND LEA leadership pertaining school. provided opportunities for to the current state of the dialogue and feedback school and improvement with both the LEA and efforts. school leadership pertaining to the current state of the school and improvement efforts. (2B) Describe the process for considering the input from family and community stakeholders. LEA in collaboration with LEA in collaboration with LEA and / or school No action was taken to school leadership, school leadership, leadership analyzed and consider family and analyzed and considered analyzed and considered considered family and community stakeholder family and community family and community community stakeholder input. stakeholder input in stakeholder input in input in selecting the selecting the intervention selecting the intervention. intervention. and provided opportunities for final approval. Score for Response Item #2: 2A ____ 2B ____ total ____ / 2 = _________
3 strong / thorough response 2 average / partial response 1 weak / minimal response 0 not addressed (2A) Describe the process for garnering input from family and community stakeholders. Family and community stakeholders were educated on the current report card ratings, current improvement efforts (CAP, Priorities, etc.) AND provided opportunities for dialogue and feedback with both the LEA and school leadership pertaining to the current state of the school and improvement efforts. Family and community stakeholders were provided opportunities for dialogue and feedback with school leadership or LEA leadership pertaining to the current state of the school and improvement efforts. Family and community stakeholders were made aware of the LEA’s intent to engage in the SIG process on behalf of the school. No action was taken to engage family and community stakeholders. (2B) Describe the process for considering the input from family and community stakeholders. LEA in collaboration with school leadership, analyzed and considered family and community stakeholder input in selecting the intervention and provided opportunities for final approval. LEA in collaboration with school leadership, analyzed and considered family and community stakeholder input in selecting the intervention. LEA and / or school leadership analyzed and considered family and community stakeholder input in selecting the intervention. No action was taken to consider family and community stakeholder input. Comments: Score for Response Item #2: 2A ____ 2B ____ total ____ / 2 = _________
fy-15-lea-application-review-rubric.docx