Not Good Good Excellent Assessment Criteria Enough Score 6 score <9 9 score 10 0 score <6 Template for Ethical Decision Making (score x 2) The paper applied the template for ethical decision making to the film • explained the salient facts for Wigand and Bergman. • ___/20 identified Wigand and decision options. • Bergman’s considered the consequences of each decision option for key • stakeholders and how each option would affect them. Ethical Issues/ Philosophical Schools (score x 1.5) The paper identified the ethical issues confronting Bergman and Wigand. • related these issues to philosophical schools of thought • ___/15 discussed in class (e.g. utilitarianism, deontology). applied essay to Bergman and Wigand—and the • Bok’s particular difficulties associated with whistleblowing. Right-versus-Right Dilemmas (score x 1.5) The paper showed an understanding of the notion of right-versus-right • dilemmas as developed by Badaracco and Kidder ___/20 identified the values in conflict for Jeffrey Wigand. • identified the values in conflict for Lowell Bergman. • provided an explanation for why each character acted as he did • in resolving his dilemma. Defining Moments (score x 1.5) The paper applied notion of defining moments to the film. • Badaracco’s identified a possible defining moment for Wigand & Bergman. • ___/15 provided evidence supporting your choice of defining moment. • explained how the decisions made by Wigand and Bergman • and their character, demonstrating “revealed, tested, shaped” ethical leadership. Organization (weight: point total x ) The paper was unified, coherent, and developed (paragraphs and essay). • ___/15 developed a thesis that unified all parts of the paper. • provided links between paragraphs and sections. • Mechanics, Format, and Document Design (score x 2) used sophisticated and appropriate language and syntax. • ___/15 wrote with a minimum of grammar and usage errors. • wrote clear, concise, and varied sentences. • followed APA guidelines for format and documentation. • Total Score __/100 Comments: Essay 2: Enron
Assessment Criteria Not Good Enough 0 score <6 Good 6 score <9 Excellent 9 score 10 Score Template for Ethical Decision Making (score x 2) The paper • applied the template for ethical decision making to the film • explained the salient facts for Wigand and Bergman. • identified Wigand and Bergman’s decision options. • considered the consequences of each decision option for key stakeholders and how each option would affect them. ___/20 Ethical Issues/ Philosophical Schools (score x 1.5) The paper • identified the ethical issues confronting Bergman and Wigand. • related these issues to philosophical schools of thought discussed in class (e.g. utilitarianism, deontology). • applied Bok’s essay to Bergman and Wigand—and the particular difficulties associated with whistleblowing. ___/15 Right-versus-Right Dilemmas (score x 1.5) The paper • showed an understanding of the notion of right-versus-right dilemmas as developed by Badaracco and Kidder • identified the values in conflict for Jeffrey Wigand. • identified the values in conflict for Lowell Bergman. • provided an explanation for why each character acted as he did in resolving his dilemma. ___/20 Defining Moments (score x 1.5) The paper • applied Badaracco’s notion of defining moments to the film. • identified a possible defining moment for Wigand & Bergman. • provided evidence supporting your choice of defining moment. • explained how the decisions made by Wigand and Bergman “revealed, tested, and shaped” their character, demonstrating ethical leadership. ___/15 Organization (weight: point total x ) The paper • was unified, coherent, and developed (paragraphs and essay). • developed a thesis that unified all parts of the paper. • provided links between paragraphs and sections. ___/15 Mechanics, Format, and Document Design (score x 2) • used sophisticated and appropriate language and syntax. • wrote with a minimum of grammar and usage errors. • wrote clear, concise, and varied sentences. • followed APA guidelines for format and documentation. ___/15 Total Score __/100 Comments: Essay 2: Enron
135.301_AY16-17.docx