documents and may use outside relies on a variety of the documents and uses background knowledge sources, all of which are cited correctly includes outside resources, all of which are thesis statement is clear. cited correctly cites multiple documents correctly SCORE POINT 3 SCORE POINT 2 SCORE POINT 1 Response is inadequate in written communication, Response is poor in written communication, Response is inferior in written communication, demonstrated by demonstrated by demonstrated by broad or simplistic ideas that are understood overly simplistic and sometimes unclear lack of purpose or ideas and sequencing. but often ineffective. ideas that have insufficiently developed organization that obscures the main attempts at organizing that are inconsistent details. point. or ineffective; beginnings and endings that sequencing of ideas that is often just a an attempt that is too short to offer are underdeveloped; repetitive transitional list; missing or ineffective details that coherent development of an idea, if it is devices. require reader and inference to stated. comprehend and follow. developmental details that are uneven, extremely limited vocabulary that shows somewhat predictable, or leave information missing beginning and/or ending. no commitment to communicating a gaps; details not always placed effectively in repetitive, monotonous, and often message. the writing. misused words awkwardly strung into sentences with confusing word order reliance on clichés and overused words that sentences that are difficult to read that may not permit oral reading. do not connect with the reader; limited because they are either choppy or severe and frequent errors in audience awareness. rambling; many sentences that begin conventions. with repetitive noun + verb pattern. monotonous and sometime misused words; has significant historical sentences may sound mechanical, although lack of audience awareness. misinterpretation. simple constructive are usually correct. little control of basic conventions no apparent thesis or topic statement. limited control of standard conventions with resulting in errors impeding readability. CITATIONS are a pre-requisite for scoring. significant errors. Contains multiple historical errors Historically accurate but overly general loosely uses background loosely makes connections to some knowledge/facts with no connections. resources. includes a general topic statement, but uses background knowledge/facts with some not a thesis connections. uses more than one document correctly includes a thesis, though it is not very clear. but relies on one document OR cites only one document cites multiple documents correctly Score: FFB 1-2 APR 3 Meets 4 EX 5-6
relies on a variety of the documents and includes outside resources, all of which are cited correctly documents and may use outside sources, all of which are cited correctly uses background knowledge thesis statement is clear. cites multiple documents correctly SCORE POINT 3 Response is inadequate in written communication, demonstrated by broad or simplistic ideas that are understood but often ineffective. attempts at organizing that are inconsistent or ineffective; beginnings and endings that are underdeveloped; repetitive transitional devices. developmental details that are uneven, somewhat predictable, or leave information gaps; details not always placed effectively in the writing. reliance on clichés and overused words that do not connect with the reader; limited audience awareness. monotonous and sometime misused words; sentences may sound mechanical, although simple constructive are usually correct. limited control of standard conventions with significant errors. Historically accurate but overly general loosely makes connections to some resources. uses background knowledge/facts with some connections. includes a thesis, though it is not very clear. cites multiple documents correctly SCORE POINT 2 Response is poor in written communication, demonstrated by overly simplistic and sometimes unclear ideas that have insufficiently developed details. sequencing of ideas that is often just a list; missing or ineffective details that require reader and inference to comprehend and follow. missing beginning and/or ending. repetitive, monotonous, and often misused words awkwardly strung into sentences that are difficult to read because they are either choppy or rambling; many sentences that begin with repetitive noun + verb pattern. lack of audience awareness. little control of basic conventions resulting in errors impeding readability. Contains multiple historical errors loosely uses background knowledge/facts with no connections. includes a general topic statement, but not a thesis uses more than one document correctly but relies on one document OR cites only one document SCORE POINT 1 Response is inferior in written communication, demonstrated by lack of purpose or ideas and sequencing. organization that obscures the main point. an attempt that is too short to offer coherent development of an idea, if it is stated. extremely limited vocabulary that shows no commitment to communicating a message. sentences with confusing word order that may not permit oral reading. severe and frequent errors in conventions. has significant historical misinterpretation. no apparent thesis or topic statement. CITATIONS are a pre-requisite for scoring. Score: FFB 1-2 APR 3 Meets 4 EX 5-6
g_00002_201310011041_9-23-2013-14-DBQ-World%20History-Form%20B-Imperialism.docx