SBG CG/SG late-filed Exhibit 10. In a third letter from Mr. Pulley to Mr. Dunn, dated August 19, 2005 regarding Colonial Garden it appears that PGW sent SBG information concerning the bill in question on July 12, 2005. Mr. Pulley writes: After review of this information the following is necessary: Breakdown by month of the billing. This should include the CCF charges, connection fees, usage, distribution fees, and the like for each purported read. do we have additional gas usage and consumption …why in the summer? We need more These bills do not make detailed information…. sense and moreover based on the CCF consumption rates that have been previously reviewed with Tom Murphy, these are exorbitant, the CCFs are out of whack. SBG CG/SG late-filed Exhibit 10. The letter dated August 19, 2005, is the last contact on the record between SBG and PGW about the bill in question in 2005. In addition, Mr. testimony that SBG Pulley’s contacted PGW about the March 5, 2005 bill in 2007, 2008, is not substantiated by “2006, 2009” additional evidence. The duplicate of the March 5, 2005 bill which appeared to have been faxed by Commercial Resource Center to SBG on May 17, 2007 is the only additional piece of PGW’s evidence indicating that this issue was being pursued by SBG in 2007. No other document or correspondence between SBG and PGW in the period 2006-2010 evidences ongoing discussions, inquiries, or disputes with regard to the March 5, 2005 bill. It was only in 2011 that the issue of the March 5, 2005 bill was picked up again by SBG, first in an e-mail dated October 13, 2011, from Mr. Lampert to Mr. Pulley, and then in an e-mail from Mr. Pulley to Daniel Murray on the same date this time in the context of challenge to the gas liens imposed on Colonial. – SBG’s SBG CG/SG late-filed Exhibit 10.
SBG CG/SG late-filed Exhibit 10. In a third letter from Mr. Pulley to Mr. Dunn, dated August 19, 2005 regarding Colonial Garden it appears that PGW sent SBG information concerning the bill in question on July 12, 2005. Mr. Pulley writes: After review of this information the following is necessary: Breakdown by month of the billing. This should include the CCF charges, connection fees, usage, distribution fees, and the like for each purported read. …why do we have additional gas usage and consumption in the summer? We need more detailed information…. These bills do not make sense and moreover based on the CCF consumption rates that have been previously reviewed with Tom Murphy, these are exorbitant, the CCFs are out of whack. SBG CG/SG late-filed Exhibit 10. The letter dated August 19, 2005, is the last contact on the record between SBG and PGW about the bill in question in 2005. In addition, Mr. Pulley’s testimony that SBG contacted PGW about the March 5, 2005 bill in “2006, 2007, 2008, 2009” is not substantiated by additional evidence. The duplicate of the March 5, 2005 bill which appeared to have been faxed by PGW’s Commercial Resource Center to SBG on May 17, 2007 is the only additional piece of evidence indicating that this issue was being pursued by SBG in 2007. No other document or correspondence between SBG and PGW in the period 2006-2010 evidences ongoing discussions, inquiries, or disputes with regard to the March 5, 2005 bill. It was only in 2011 that the issue of the March 5, 2005 bill was picked up again by SBG, first in an e-mail dated October 13, 2011, from Mr. Lampert to Mr. Pulley, and then in an e-mail from Mr. Pulley to Daniel Murray on the same date – this time in the context of SBG’s challenge to the gas liens imposed on Colonial. SBG CG/SG late-filed Exhibit 10.
1382333.docx