therefore, are at risk of being omitted from humanitarian screened for and/or information collected in standards household assistance. Nor does it address those marginalised within assessments and should therefore households that do not benefit from intra-household only be taken into account if These are context-specific issues and Red Cross information is known; this information Crescent responders must bear this in mind beyond this must not be specifically sought for the model. purposes of compelling this All statements marked with an asterisk (*) will have to prioritisation tool be considered carefully as they are heavily Total score this section (maximum and relative. These statements should be either 25) re-written or omitted. Household characteristics Economic situation Number of individuals in household is If yes, No one in the household is currently If yes, greater than five score 5 engaged in employment score 5 The household includes an elderly If yes, The household is not in receipt of If yes, person(s)*, a pregnant or lactating score 5 financial support from relatives score 5 woman, a person(s) with a disability The household has little to no If yes, and/or chronic illness, orphan(s) and significant assets* score 5 or/a teenage mother (i.e. under 18 The household has not received a If yes, years). humanitarian assistance card* score 5 The head of household is elderly If yes, Total score this section person(s)*, a woman, a child (under score 5 18 years) or a man with no spouse/partner supporting children Sector-specific issues (Example here is for shelter – The household identifies as If yes, housing conditions) indigenous, minority group etc. score 5 Other known vulnerabilities. Adapt If yes, The household has no formal land If yes, this section for context-specific issues, score 5 tenure or secure occupancy score 5 which might include people who Children of school-going age have no If yes, identify as LGBTI, trafficked women access to education score 5 and children and women and children subjected to violence. Note that these are not issues that can be routinely
therefore, are at risk of being omitted from humanitarian assistance. Nor does it address those marginalised within households that do not benefit from intra-household These are context-specific issues and Red Cross Crescent responders must bear this in mind beyond this model. All statements marked with an asterisk (*) will have to be considered carefully as they are heavily and relative. These statements should be either re-written or omitted. Household characteristics Number of individuals in household is greater than five If yes, score 5 The household includes an elderly person(s)*, a pregnant or lactating woman, a person(s) with a disability and/or chronic illness, orphan(s) and or/a teenage mother (i.e. under 18 years). If yes, score 5 The head of household is elderly person(s)*, a woman, a child (under 18 years) or a man with no spouse/partner supporting children If yes, score 5 The household identifies as indigenous, minority group etc. If yes, score 5 Other known vulnerabilities. Adapt this section for context-specific issues, which might include people who identify as LGBTI, trafficked women and children and women and children subjected to violence. Note that these are not issues that can be routinely screened for and/or information collected in standards household assessments and should therefore only be taken into account if information is known; this information must not be specifically sought for the purposes of compelling this prioritisation tool If yes, score 5 Total score this section (maximum 25) Economic situation No one in the household is currently engaged in employment If yes, score 5 The household is not in receipt of financial support from relatives If yes, score 5 The household has little to no significant assets* If yes, score 5 The household has not received a humanitarian assistance card* If yes, score 5 Total score this section Sector-specific issues (Example here is for shelter – housing conditions) The household has no formal land tenure or secure occupancy If yes, score 5 Children of school-going age have no access to education If yes, score 5
GUIDANCE-DOC-IFRC-Selection-and-prioritisation-criteria_EN.docx