Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below): Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: 4. Intervention Planning: Develops clinical and/or administrative project goals that include input from clients, multiple stakeholders, and/or information sources. Identifies specific, measurable, and achievable goals and integrates the best available evidence and/or knowledge. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Does not demonstrate the Demonstrates emerging Consistently applies the Unable to ability to apply knowledge ability to apply the best best available knowledge assess from research and/or available knowledge from from research and/or practice wisdom to research and/or practice practice wisdom to develop specific, wisdom to develop develop specific, measurable, and specific, measurable, and measurable, and achievable goals that are achievable goals that are achievable goals that are relevant to stakeholders relevant to stakeholders highly relevant to stakeholders Does not use needs Applies some needs Applies all needs Unable to assessment data and assessment data and assessment data and assess evaluation tools for evaluation tools for evaluation tools for effective intervention effective intervention effective intervention planning on a policy planning on a policy planning on a policy and/or program level and/or program level and/or program level Lacks ability to critically Emerging ability to Critically appraises and Unable to appraise and apply critically appraise research applies research and/or assess research and/or practice and/or practice wisdom to practice wisdom to wisdom to intervention intervention planning intervention planning planning Lacks awareness of Exhibits some awareness Thoroughly considers Unable to implications (e.g. of multi-faceted multi-faceted implications assess funding, policy, strategy, implications (e.g. funding, (e.g. funding, policy, relational, social justice) policy, strategy, relational, strategy, relational, social social justice) justice) Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to intervention planning? Unable 1 2 3 4 5 to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess
Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below): Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: 4. Intervention Planning: Develops clinical and/or administrative project goals that include input from clients, multiple stakeholders, and/or information sources. Identifies specific, measurable, and achievable goals and integrates the best available evidence and/or knowledge. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Does not demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge from research and/or practice wisdom to develop specific, measurable, and achievable goals that are relevant to stakeholders Demonstrates emerging ability to apply the best available knowledge from research and/or practice wisdom to develop specific, measurable, and achievable goals that are relevant to stakeholders Consistently applies the best available knowledge from research and/or practice wisdom to develop specific, measurable, and achievable goals that are highly relevant to stakeholders Unable to assess Does not use needs assessment data and evaluation tools for effective intervention planning on a policy and/or program level Applies some needs assessment data and evaluation tools for effective intervention planning on a policy and/or program level Applies all needs assessment data and evaluation tools for effective intervention planning on a policy and/or program level Unable to assess Lacks ability to critically appraise and apply research and/or practice wisdom to intervention planning Emerging ability to critically appraise research and/or practice wisdom to intervention planning Critically appraises and applies research and/or practice wisdom to intervention planning Unable to assess Lacks awareness of implications (e.g. funding, policy, strategy, relational, social justice) Exhibits some awareness of multi-faceted implications (e.g. funding, policy, strategy, relational, social justice) Thoroughly considers multi-faceted implications (e.g. funding, policy, strategy, relational, social justice) Unable to assess Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to intervention planning? 1 2 3 4 5 Unable to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess
First%20Semester%20Progress%20Review%2C%20Second%20Year%20Management%20and%20Planning%20Students%2C%202014-2015_0.docx