results (ranging information from $0.12 to on the source $0.16 per patient of the costs per day saved). was limited for some items. Some Authors' costs were conclusions estimated in 2001 but the price year was The not reported, teledermatology which makes service decreased reflation the time to initial exercises in definitive other settings intervention, but difficult. The was more costly costs were than usual care treated (UC) for a dermatology in the consultation. TD but could be extensive considered variations of in the base-case settings requiring costs were long waiting investigated in periods for the sensitivity routine analysis. The dermatological indirect costs care. were also included in the sensitivity
results (ranging from $0.12 to $0.16 per patient per day saved). Authors' conclusions The teledermatology service decreased the time to initial definitive intervention, but was more costly than usual care (UC) for a dermatology consultation. TD could be considered in settings requiring long waiting periods for routine dermatological care. information on the source of the costs was limited for some items. Some costs were estimated in 2001 but the price year was not reported, which makes reflation exercises in other settings difficult. The costs were treated in the but extensive variations of the base-case costs were investigated in the sensitivity analysis. The indirect costs were also included in the sensitivity
1360%20-%20FinalAssessmentReport%20-accessible.docx