End of Term Evaluation Process Using the following scale, field instructors will rate the student’s practice proficiency, assigning a score for each of the ten competency areas and all associated practice behaviors. An evaluation score of 2 or 1 requires an explanation. Superior / Advanced Competence = 5: Consistently demonstrates the ability to function independently with very high levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill; overall work quality/task completion is exceptional, suggesting mastery of the practice behavior. Above Average Competence = 4: Typically demonstrates moderate-to-high levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill; overall work quality/task completion exceeds basic practice standards and the level of competence is above average, suggesting additional guidance in key areas would promote mastery. Basic Competence = 3: Normally demonstrates acceptable levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill; overall work quality/task completion meets basic practice standards, but the level of competence is somewhat rudimentary, suggesting additional training and guidance may be beneficial but that the student is ready to enter the field. Below Average Competence = 2: Commonly demonstrates levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill that are below basic practice standards; overall work quality/task completion is below acceptable standards and the degree of competence is lacking, suggesting the need for additional training and consideration of corrective action. Poor / Unacceptable Competence = 1: Demonstrates unacceptable levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill; overall work quality/task completion is exceedingly poor and the degree of competence is very seriously lacking, requiring corrective action. Student and field instructor will review the learning activities, and discuss the student’s progress toward and preparation for professional practice upon receipt of his/her degree. Student and field instructor will complete the Term Grade, Hours and Evaluation page. Signatures provide an official record of the hours logged and the evaluation scores. Student and field instructor must each complete a narrative regarding the student’s performance and growth through the term using the questions and space provided on the evaluation page. Please be sure to describe the competencies and practice behaviors in which the student is particularly strong and those areas that need improvement.
End of Term Evaluation Process Using the following scale, field instructors will rate the student’s practice proficiency, assigning a score for each of the ten competency areas and all associated practice behaviors. An evaluation score of 2 or 1 requires an explanation. Superior / Advanced Competence = 5: Consistently demonstrates the ability to function independently with very high levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill; overall work quality/task completion is exceptional, suggesting mastery of the practice behavior. Above Average Competence = 4: Typically demonstrates moderate-to-high levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill; overall work quality/task completion exceeds basic practice standards and the level of competence is above average, suggesting additional guidance in key areas would promote mastery. Basic Competence = 3: Normally demonstrates acceptable levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill; overall work quality/task completion meets basic practice standards, but the level of competence is somewhat rudimentary, suggesting additional training and guidance may be beneficial but that the student is ready to enter the field. Below Average Competence = 2: Commonly demonstrates levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill that are below basic practice standards; overall work quality/task completion is below acceptable standards and the degree of competence is lacking, suggesting the need for additional training and consideration of corrective action. Poor / Unacceptable Competence = 1: Demonstrates unacceptable levels of awareness, knowledge and/or skill; overall work quality/task completion is exceedingly poor and the degree of competence is very seriously lacking, requiring corrective action. Student and field instructor will review the learning activities, and discuss the student’s progress toward and preparation for professional practice upon receipt of his/her degree. Student and field instructor will complete the Term Grade, Hours and Evaluation page. Signatures provide an official record of the hours logged and the evaluation scores. Student and field instructor must each complete a narrative regarding the student’s performance and growth through the term using the questions and space provided on the evaluation page. Please be sure to describe the competencies and practice behaviors in which the student is particularly strong and those areas that need improvement.
Foundation%20Learning%20Contract%20Updated%209-14-15(1).docx