Gives teachers guidance in evaluating and improving their work. The evaluator’s assessment is a reflection of the teacher's performance during formal observations as well as his or her overall performance. The evaluation software, whether Excel-based or web-based, calculates the average score for each domain according to the scores entered for each indicator within the domain. The overall evaluation score—the composite average—is determined by calculating a weighted average of the evaluation's domain scores. The rubric's descriptions as to each indicator are organized along a five-point scale 2.3 with numeric rankings of 1 - 5. The rankings of N/A and N/O are used for not Rankings of applicable and not observed behavior (evidence) respectively. The numeric scores Performance represent the following rankings: 3. Overview of the System's Weighted Scoring Domains vary in importance, especially with regard to how much they impact student 3.1 achievement. For purposes of establishing the overall effectiveness of a teacher's Relative performance, and hence the overall evaluation score, the TLE Observation and Evaluation Weights of System weights the rubric's domains according to their relative importance. Domains Domains... Their weights and their number of Indicators Classroom Instructional Professional Interpersonal Leadership Management Effectiveness Growth Skills (% weight / # of (% weight / # of (% weight / # of (% weight / # of (% weight / # of indicators) indicators) indicators) indicators) indicators)
Gives teachers guidance in evaluating and improving their work. The evaluator’s assessment is a reflection of the teacher's performance during formal observations as well as his or her overall performance. The evaluation software, whether Excel-based or web-based, calculates the average score for each domain according to the scores entered for each indicator within the domain. The overall evaluation score—the composite average—is determined by calculating a weighted average of the evaluation's domain scores. 2.3 Rankings of Performance The rubric's descriptions as to each indicator are organized along a five-point scale with numeric rankings of 1 - 5. The rankings of N/A and N/O are used for not applicable and not observed behavior (evidence) respectively. The numeric scores represent the following rankings: 3. Overview of the System's Weighted Scoring 3.1 Relative Weights of Domains Domains vary in importance, especially with regard to how much they impact student achievement. For purposes of establishing the overall effectiveness of a teacher's performance, and hence the overall evaluation score, the TLE Observation and Evaluation System weights the rubric's domains according to their relative importance. Domains... Their weights and their number of Indicators Classroom Management (% weight / # of indicators) Instructional Effectiveness (% weight / # of indicators) Professional Growth (% weight / # of indicators) Interpersonal Skills (% weight / # of indicators) Leadership (% weight / # of indicators)
Handbook-for-TLE-Tulsa-Model-Evaluators.docx