Table 2.2: Community and Stakeholders Values, Attitudes and Issues – Stakeholder group and Impact Supporting values/attitudes Challenging values/attitudes Issues Directly Affected Landowners (DAL) Desire for financial security or Attitudes to mining perceived Impact on farming operations – retirement from farming competition with farming Property access Landholders and residents within Project offers economic benefits. Attitudes to the land; legacy for the future; Legal arrangements the project area Employment sustainable management of resources Perceived relationship with Kalbar Supply of goods and services. Attitudes to community and lifestyle Lifestyle and amenity – Diversification of income community cohesion; family history; Impacts on water resources Social/community country lifestyle Land values and compensation benefits investment in social Fear and uncertainty over project project Rehabilitation – – infrastructure viability; project components and layout; Increased heavy vehicle traffic Willingness to work with Kalbar financial compensation Native flora and fauna Opposition to land access Employment Avoidance of community conflict Social fabric Distrust of Kalbar and/or approvals process Visual, dust (including radiation) and noise impacts Community services and infrastructure Safety and human health impacts Nearby Landowners (NL) Project offers economic benefits Attitudes to mining perceived Impact on rural land use – · Employment competition with farming Lifestyle and amenity Landholders and residents adjacent · Supply of goods and services Attitudes to the land; legacy for the future; Impacts on water resources to and near the project area · Diversification of income sustainable management of resources Land values and compensation Social/community Attitudes to community and lifestyle Rehabilitation – benefits investment in social community cohesion; family history; erosion Increased heavy vehicle traffic – infrastructure of community values Native flora and fauna Desire for detailed information about Land access/community rights lack of Employment – the project and its potential impacts compensation despite potential impacts Social fabric Distrust of Kalbar and/or approvals process Visual, dust (including radiation) and noise impacts Community services and infrastructure Safety and human health impacts Local Communities (LC) Project offers economic benefits. Attitudes to mining - perceived Impact on rural land use Employment competition with farming and tourism Lifestyle and amenity Community members within the Supply of goods and services. Attitudes to the land; legacy for the future; Water requirements and potential impacts on water local communities of Glenaladale, Diversification of income sustainable management of resources resources Lindenow, Fernbank, Lindenow Social/community Attitudes to community and lifestyle Land values and compensation. – South, Walpa and Flaggy Creek benefits investment in social community cohesion; family history; country Rehabilitation –
Table 2.2: Community and Stakeholders – Values, Attitudes and Issues Stakeholder group and Impact Supporting values/attitudes Challenging values/attitudes Issues Directly Affected Landowners (DAL) Landholders and residents within the project area Desire for financial security or retirement from farming Project offers economic benefits. Employment Supply of goods and services. Diversification of income Social/community benefits – investment in social infrastructure Willingness to work with Kalbar Attitudes to mining – perceived competition with farming Attitudes to the land; legacy for the future; sustainable management of resources Attitudes to community and lifestyle – community cohesion; family history; country lifestyle Fear and uncertainty over project – project viability; project components and layout; financial compensation Opposition to land access Avoidance of community conflict Distrust of Kalbar and/or approvals process Impact on farming operations Property access Legal arrangements Perceived relationship with Kalbar Lifestyle and amenity Impacts on water resources Land values and compensation Rehabilitation Increased heavy vehicle traffic Native flora and fauna Employment Social fabric Visual, dust (including radiation) and noise impacts Community services and infrastructure Safety and human health impacts Nearby Landowners (NL) Landholders and residents adjacent to and near the project area Project offers economic benefits · Employment · Supply of goods and services · Diversification of income Social/community benefits – investment in social infrastructure Desire for detailed information about the project and its potential impacts Attitudes to mining – perceived competition with farming Attitudes to the land; legacy for the future; sustainable management of resources Attitudes to community and lifestyle – community cohesion; family history; erosion of community values Land access/community rights – lack of compensation despite potential impacts Distrust of Kalbar and/or approvals process Impact on rural land use Lifestyle and amenity Impacts on water resources Land values and compensation Rehabilitation Increased heavy vehicle traffic Native flora and fauna Employment Social fabric Visual, dust (including radiation) and noise impacts Community services and infrastructure Safety and human health impacts Local Communities (LC) Community members within the local communities of Glenaladale, Lindenow, Fernbank, Lindenow South, Walpa and Flaggy Creek Project offers economic benefits. Employment Supply of goods and services. Diversification of income Social/community benefits – investment in social Attitudes to mining - perceived competition with farming and tourism Attitudes to the land; legacy for the future; sustainable management of resources Attitudes to community and lifestyle – community cohesion; family history; country Impact on rural land use Lifestyle and amenity Water requirements and potential impacts on water resources Land values and compensation. Rehabilitation
Fingerboards-Mineral-Sands-Project-EES-Consultation-Plan-May-2017.docx