How are demonstrations of professional responsibilities measured? How observations and artifact collection are differentiated for central office administrators? INDICATOR Insufficient Progressing Sufficient Evidence A1.5 Administrators are The evaluation system has few The evaluation system has The evaluation system has evaluated on the effectiveness of or no features that define high features that define high quality specific features that define the quality of educational quality leadership practices leadership practices, but may not high quality leadership leadership as evidenced in the and there is little or no link include links between the practices and directly links Oregon Standards for between these features to features and evaluation tools and these features to evaluation Educational Leadership IISLLC). evaluation tools and processes. tools and processes. processes. Instructional leadership is Evaluation includes multiple Evaluation includes multiple evidenced by alignment of There is little or no evidence formal and informal observations formal and informal curriculum and instruction to that evaluation includes that support making inferences observations that support CCSS. multiple formal and informal about the quality of leadership, making valid inferences about observations that support but the quality of the the quality of leadership. making valid inferences about observations or structure of the the quality of leadership. observations may limit the Evaluation includes protocols validity of the inferences. and processes for, and There is little or no evidence implementation of a systematic that evaluation includes the Evaluation includes the protocols review of artifacts related to protocols and processes for a and processes for a systematic administrator performance that systematic review of artifacts review of artifacts related to support making valid related to administrator administrator performance, but inferences. performance. the implementation may limit the validity of inferences Guiding Questions 1.5: What is the process or strategies used in observation? How frequently are observations conducted? How many observations within a cycle? What feedback is provided and how is it provided? What is the process of artifact selection and review? How frequently is the artifact review conducted? What feedback is provided and how is it provided? How does the system ensure administrators implement effective leadership strategies? How do observations and review of artifacts of leadership practice and demonstration of professional responsibilities reflect administrator support for CCSS implementation?
How are demonstrations of professional responsibilities measured? How observations and artifact collection are differentiated for central office administrators? INDICATOR Insufficient Progressing Sufficient Evidence A1.5 Administrators are evaluated on the effectiveness of the quality of educational leadership as evidenced in the Oregon Standards for Educational Leadership IISLLC). Instructional leadership is evidenced by alignment of curriculum and instruction to CCSS. The evaluation system has few or no features that define high quality leadership practices and there is little or no link between these features to evaluation tools and processes. There is little or no evidence that evaluation includes multiple formal and informal observations that support making valid inferences about the quality of leadership. There is little or no evidence that evaluation includes the protocols and processes for a systematic review of artifacts related to administrator performance. The evaluation system has features that define high quality leadership practices, but may not include links between the features and evaluation tools and processes. Evaluation includes multiple formal and informal observations that support making inferences about the quality of leadership, but the quality of the observations or structure of the observations may limit the validity of the inferences. Evaluation includes the protocols and processes for a systematic review of artifacts related to administrator performance, but the implementation may limit the validity of inferences The evaluation system has specific features that define high quality leadership practices and directly links these features to evaluation tools and processes. Evaluation includes multiple formal and informal observations that support making valid inferences about the quality of leadership. Evaluation includes protocols and processes for, and implementation of a systematic review of artifacts related to administrator performance that support making valid inferences. Guiding Questions 1.5: What is the process or strategies used in observation? How frequently are observations conducted? How many observations within a cycle? What feedback is provided and how is it provided? What is the process of artifact selection and review? How frequently is the artifact review conducted? What feedback is provided and how is it provided? How does the system ensure administrators implement effective leadership strategies? How do observations and review of artifacts of leadership practice and demonstration of professional responsibilities reflect administrator support for CCSS implementation?
final-self-appraisal-tool.docx