observed OS 1 y K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest MTA 82.4 vs RFA 86.6% Low Critical 8/9 serious spurious effect, but no effect was patients ⊕⊕⨀⨀ observed OS 2 y K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest MTA 66.9% vs RFA 54.8% Low Critical 8/9 spurious effect, but no effect was serious patients ⊕⊕⨀⨀ observed OS 3 y K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest MTA 55.8% vs RFA 44.3% Low Critical 8/9 serious spurious effect, but no effect was patients ⊕⊕⨀⨀ observed OS 5 y K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest MTA 44.0% vs RFA 31.7% Low Critical 8/9 serious spurious effect, but no effect was patients ⊕⊕⨀⨀ observed Complete K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest MTA 93.5% vs RFA 84.3% Low Critical 8/9 ablation serious spurious effect, but no effect was patients, P = 0.094 ⊕⊕⨀⨀ observed MTA = microwave tissue ablation; OS = overall survival; RCCC = retrospective concurrent control cohort; RFA = radiofrequency ablation; RHCC = retrospective historical control cohort
observed OS 1 y K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very serious Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest spurious effect, but no effect was observed MTA 82.4 vs RFA 86.6% patients Low ⊕⊕⨀⨀ Critical 8/9 OS 2 y K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very serious Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest spurious effect, but no effect was observed MTA 66.9% vs RFA 54.8% patients Low ⊕⊕⨀⨀ Critical 8/9 OS 3 y K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very serious Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest spurious effect, but no effect was observed MTA 55.8% vs RFA 44.3% patients Low ⊕⊕⨀⨀ Critical 8/9 OS 5 y K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very serious Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest spurious effect, but no effect was observed MTA 44.0% vs RFA 31.7% patients Low ⊕⊕⨀⨀ Critical 8/9 Complete ablation K = 1 RCCC, N = 89 Very serious Not serious Not serious Not serious Confounding would suggest spurious effect, but no effect was observed MTA 93.5% vs RFA 84.3% patients, P = 0.094 Low ⊕⊕⨀⨀ Critical 8/9 MTA = microwave tissue ablation; OS = overall survival; RCCC = retrospective concurrent control cohort; RFA = radiofrequency ablation; RHCC = retrospective historical control cohort
1402-%20Final%20Contracted%20Assessment%20Report%20(ACCESSIBLE).docx