Mock House of Commons Activity Rubric Components Not Meeting Approaching Meeting Expectations Exceeding Expectations Expectations (0%-50%) Expectations (50%-65%) (66%-90%) (90%-100%) Significant numbers of Some components are missing or Required components are All required components are Bill components are missing or poorly developed; Simple or complete, appropriate, and complete, effective, and add flawed; insufficient, irrelevant, basic information; Valid but with developed; covers topic value to the final product; inaccurate, or incomplete little depth or elaboration; effectively; critical thinking with details and information Limited critical evident; demonstrates examples; demonstrates thinking evident exploration of the topics abstract thinking; Develops complex concepts Little to no participation in Made attempt to engage in Conducted themselves in Conducted themselves in Committee Participation committee discussion; committee discussion; professional manner and were professional manner and an effectively executing Revision notes contain a Revision notes miss some engaged and active participant parliamentary procedures; significant number of components components or are poorly in continuously contributed to missing or flawed; developed; committee; committee Comments and proposed Comments and proposed Revision notes reflect critical Revision notes reflect abstract amendments are insufficient, amendments are valid but reflect thinking thinking and critical reflection; irrelevant, or inaccurate little depth or elaboration Proposed amendments to bills Proposed amendments that were implemented in bills Little to no participation in Made attempt to engage in Conducted themselves in Conducted themselves in Floor Debate debate; debate; professional manner and were professional manner and Participation an effectively executing Comments made during debate Comments made during debate engaged and active participant parliamentary procedures; are are valid but reflect little depth or in irrelevant or inaccurate elaboration debate; Continuously contributed and provide depth to debate; Effectively provided justification for or against a bill; Effectively discussed or proposed bill
Mock House of Commons Activity Rubric Components Not Meeting Expectations (0%-50%) Approaching Expectations (50%-65%) Meeting Expectations (66%-90%) Exceeding Expectations (90%-100%) Bill Significant numbers of components are missing or flawed; insufficient, irrelevant, inaccurate, or incomplete information Some components are missing or poorly developed; Simple or basic information; Valid but with little depth or elaboration; Limited critical thinking evident Required components are complete, appropriate, and developed; covers topic effectively; critical thinking evident; demonstrates exploration of the topics All required components are complete, effective, and add value to the final product; with details and examples; demonstrates abstract thinking; Develops complex concepts Committee Participation Little to no participation in committee discussion; Revision notes contain a significant number of components missing or flawed; Comments and proposed amendments are insufficient, irrelevant, or inaccurate Made attempt to engage in committee discussion; Revision notes miss some components or are poorly developed; Comments and proposed amendments are valid but reflect little depth or elaboration Conducted themselves in professional manner and were an engaged and active participant in committee; Revision notes reflect critical thinking Proposed amendments to bills Conducted themselves in professional manner and effectively executing parliamentary procedures; continuously contributed to committee Revision notes reflect abstract thinking and critical reflection; Proposed amendments that were implemented in bills Floor Debate Participation Little to no participation in debate; Comments made during debate are irrelevant or inaccurate Made attempt to engage in debate; Comments made during debate are valid but reflect little depth or elaboration Conducted themselves in professional manner and were an engaged and active participant in debate; Effectively provided justification for or against a bill; Conducted themselves in professional manner and effectively executing parliamentary procedures; Continuously contributed and provide depth to debate; Effectively discussed or proposed bill
grading_rubric.docx