(2016) Comparative diagnostic at the postoperative conventional imaging in 1161 patients with (pp 141-148), 2016. accuracy surveillance in the breast suspected metastases and/or recurrent BC cancer patients. Kim YH et al Suspected metastases The clinical significance of The objective of this study was to investigate the 2015 (2015) standardized uptake value clinical and biological significance of F-FDG) uptake PET prognosis in breast cancer measured levels in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND using METHODS: F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 206 positron women with breast cancer, and the standardized emission uptake value (SUV) in breast cancer was analyzed to tomography/computed test associations with prognostic parameters. tomography. Koolen BB . et Non-randomised Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT Comparative diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT versus Koolen BB . et al. Acta Oncologica. 2014 al (2014) for primary tumor conventional imaging in 62 patients with LABC. 53 (1) (pp 50-57), 2014.) Comparative diagnostic visualization and staging in accuracy T1 breast cancer. Krammer J et Suspected metastases (18)F-FDG PET/CT for initial To evaluate the impact of whole-body 18F-FDG European radiology. 25 (8) (pp 2015 al (2015) staging in breast cancer PET/CT on initial staging of breast cancer in 2460-2469), 2015. Date of Change in management patients - Is there a relevant comparison to conventional staging modalities. Publication: 01 Aug 2015. impact on treatment N=101 patients. Preoperative whole-body staging planning compared to with PET/CT was performed in patients with clinical conventional staging stage>T2 tumours or positive local lymph nodes modalities? (n=91). Postoperative PET/CT was performed in patients without these criteria but positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (n=10). All patients underwent PET/CT and a conventional staging algorithm, which included bone scan, chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasound. PET/CT findings were compared to conventional staging and the impact on therapeutic management was evaluated.
(2016) Comparative diagnostic accuracy at the postoperative surveillance in the breast cancer patients. conventional imaging in 1161 patients with suspected metastases and/or recurrent BC (pp 141-148), 2016. Kim YH et al (2015) Suspected metastases PET prognosis The clinical significance of standardized uptake value in breast cancer measured using positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical and biological significance of F-FDG) uptake levels in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 206 women with breast cancer, and the standardized uptake value (SUV) in breast cancer was analyzed to test associations with prognostic parameters. 2015 Koolen BB . et al (2014) Non-randomised Comparative diagnostic accuracy Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary tumor visualization and staging in T1 breast cancer. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT versus conventional imaging in 62 patients with LABC. Koolen BB . et al. Acta Oncologica. 53 (1) (pp 50-57), 2014.) 2014 Krammer J et al (2015) Suspected metastases Change in management (18)F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer patients - Is there a relevant impact on treatment planning compared to conventional staging modalities? To evaluate the impact of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT on initial staging of breast cancer in comparison to conventional staging modalities. N=101 patients. Preoperative whole-body staging with PET/CT was performed in patients with clinical stage>T2 tumours or positive local lymph nodes (n=91). Postoperative PET/CT was performed in patients without these criteria but positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (n=10). All patients underwent PET/CT and a conventional staging algorithm, which included bone scan, chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasound. PET/CT findings were compared to conventional staging and the impact on therapeutic management was evaluated. European radiology. 25 (8) (pp 2460-2469), 2015. Date of Publication: 01 Aug 2015. 2015
1357.1_MSAC_Application_REDACTED_version.docx