Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to communication? Unable 1 2 3 4 5 to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below): Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: 10. Professional Ethics: Considers and applies the professional code of ethics for social workers so as to recognize ethical conflicts and arrive at principled decisions. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Does not understand, Consistently demonstrates Instills social work values in Unable adopt, and/or abide by the key values of the colleagues and social to key ethical values and profession of social work systems through assess principles contributions and example Does not recognize or Able to recognize most Provides others with Unable manage personal values or ethical dilemmas, review consultation and training on to biases related to children standards, and initiate key ethical values and assess and families consultation principles Unable to tolerate Able to tolerate ambiguity Accepts ambiguity and fully Unable ambiguity and/or to and discomfort so as to engages in consultative to engage in appropriate explore sensitive topics conversations about highly assess resolution strategies during instructional and sensitive matters consultation processes Unable to identify or Explores continued access Advocates for continued Unable discuss the needs of to child and family services access to child and family to underserved groups or for underserved groups or services for underserved assess populations populations groups or populations Makes decisions that are Able to openly weigh, Consistently resolves Unable reflexive, secretive, and/or consider, and balance complex dilemmas through to unethical competing needs and arrive a reasoned, principled, assess at a principled decision transparent, and interactive process Consistently resolves complex dilemmas through a reasoned, principled, transparent, and interactive process
Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to communication? 1 2 3 4 5 Unable to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below): Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: 10. Professional Ethics: Considers and applies the professional code of ethics for social workers so as to recognize ethical conflicts and arrive at principled decisions. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Does not understand, adopt, and/or abide by key ethical values and principles Consistently demonstrates the key values of the profession of social work Instills social work values in colleagues and social systems through contributions and example Unable to assess Does not recognize or manage personal values or biases related to children and families Able to recognize most ethical dilemmas, review standards, and initiate consultation Provides others with consultation and training on key ethical values and principles Unable to assess Unable to tolerate ambiguity and/or to engage in appropriate resolution strategies Able to tolerate ambiguity and discomfort so as to explore sensitive topics during instructional and consultation processes Accepts ambiguity and fully engages in consultative conversations about highly sensitive matters Unable to assess Unable to identify or discuss the needs of underserved groups or populations Explores continued access to child and family services for underserved groups or populations Advocates for continued access to child and family services for underserved groups or populations Unable to assess Makes decisions that are reflexive, secretive, and/or unethical Able to openly weigh, consider, and balance competing needs and arrive at a principled decision Consistently resolves complex dilemmas through a reasoned, principled, transparent, and interactive process Consistently resolves complex dilemmas through a reasoned, principled, transparent, and interactive process Unable to assess
First%20Semester%20Progress%20Review%2C%20Second%20Year%20CF%20Students.docx