for inclusion. Ebner, et al Mobile teledermatology: a Patients attending the outpatient clinic for Children, subjects with skin lesions that could feasibility study of 58 subjects using mobile an urgent-care dermatology visit: adults not be visibly documented (e.g. phones. Journal of Telemedicine and with visible skin lesions; willing to phlebothrombosis) or subjects who were not Telecare 2008Volume 14 Number 1, p2-7 participate; and able to provide informed willing to provide informed consent consent. Edison, 2008 Diagnosis, diagnostic Head-to-head trial Not reported confidence, and management concordance Enrolled subjected were a convenience in live-interactive and store-and-forward sample of new patients who teledermatology compared to in-person and subsequently presented to examination Telemedicine Journal & the dermatology clinic on a “study” day. 2008, 14 (9) 889-95 Every patient was invited to participate Heffner VA, Lyon VB, Brousseau DC, Consecutive patients enrolled to the Not reported Holland KE, Yen K. Store-and-forward pediatric dermatology clinic with a rash or teledermatology versus in-person visits: a rash descriptors (bumps, spots, patches) comparison in pediatric teledermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;60:956-61. High, et al Assessment of the accuracy of Patients presented for FTF consultation at No specific exclusion criteria low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology the Dermatology department. No specific consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42: inclusion criteria 776-83. Kvedar et al. The substitution of digital Adult patients presenting with Patients with a presenting complaint of acne or images for dermatologic physical dermatologic symptoms in a university- warts were excluded because these conditions examination. Arch Dermatol based practice who consented to have pose no diagnostic challenge and would their skin conditions documented with a favourably bias the study. still digital camera according to a standardized protocol. Tucker 2005 New patients agreed to have a digital Unclear photograph taken of their lesions or a representative area of their eruption. Mahendran 2004 Patients with suspicious skin lesions Unclear being referred by GP to a dermatology department. Oztas 2006 Randomly selected outpatients from the Unclear department of dermatology Rashid 2003 Selective patients from the outpatient Unclear department of dermatology
for inclusion. Ebner, et al Mobile teledermatology: a feasibility study of 58 subjects using mobile phones. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2008Volume 14 Number 1, p2-7 Patients attending the outpatient clinic for an urgent-care dermatology visit: adults with visible skin lesions; willing to participate; and able to provide informed consent. Children, subjects with skin lesions that could not be visibly documented (e.g. phlebothrombosis) or subjects who were not willing to provide informed consent Edison, 2008 Diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and management concordance in live-interactive and store-and-forward teledermatology compared to in-person examination Telemedicine Journal & 2008, 14 (9) 889-95 Head-to-head trial Enrolled subjected were a convenience sample of new patients who and subsequently presented to the dermatology clinic on a “study” day. Every patient was invited to participate Not reported Heffner VA, Lyon VB, Brousseau DC, Holland KE, Yen K. Store-and-forward teledermatology versus in-person visits: a comparison in pediatric teledermatology clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;60:956-61. Consecutive patients enrolled to the pediatric dermatology clinic with a rash or rash descriptors (bumps, spots, patches) Not reported High, et al Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42: 776-83. Patients presented for FTF consultation at the Dermatology department. No specific inclusion criteria No specific exclusion criteria Kvedar et al. The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. Arch Dermatol Adult patients presenting with dermatologic symptoms in a university- based practice who consented to have their skin conditions documented with a still digital camera according to a standardized protocol. Patients with a presenting complaint of acne or warts were excluded because these conditions pose no diagnostic challenge and would favourably bias the study. Tucker 2005 New patients agreed to have a digital photograph taken of their lesions or a representative area of their eruption. Unclear Mahendran 2004 Patients with suspicious skin lesions being referred by GP to a dermatology department. Unclear Oztas 2006 Randomly selected outpatients from the department of dermatology Unclear Rashid 2003 Selective patients from the outpatient department of dermatology Unclear
1360%20-%20FinalAssessmentReport%20-accessible.docx