Scoring All applications will be scored against the set of assessment criteria (See table above). The scores that can be awarded are: Assessment Score Interpretation Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates a Excellent 4 thorough understanding of the requirement and provides details of how the requirement will be met in full. Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides Good 3 details on how the requirements will be fulfilled. Response is relevant and acceptable. The response addresses a Acceptable 2 broad understanding of the requirement but may lack details on how the requirement will be fulfilled in certain areas. Response is partially relevant but generally poor. The response addresses some elements of the requirement but contains Poor 1 insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate how the requirement will be fulfilled. Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate an ability to Unacceptable 0 meet the requirement. Weighting The scores given to the questions will not all have the same value and the weighting of these scores is shown in the table below. Criteria Weighting Maximum score Description of activities or 4 16 services Output/Outcome targets 4 16 Staff team 4 16 Individual needs in a 4 16 group context Individual Progress 2 8 Monitoring and Evaluation 2 8 Maximum total Score 80
Scoring All applications will be scored against the set of assessment criteria (See table above). The scores that can be awarded are: Assessment Score Interpretation Excellent 4 Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the requirement and provides details of how the requirement will be met in full. Good 3 Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides details on how the requirements will be fulfilled. Acceptable 2 Response is relevant and acceptable. The response addresses a broad understanding of the requirement but may lack details on how the requirement will be fulfilled in certain areas. Poor 1 Response is partially relevant but generally poor. The response addresses some elements of the requirement but contains insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate how the requirement will be fulfilled. Unacceptable 0 Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate an ability to meet the requirement. Weighting The scores given to the questions will not all have the same value and the weighting of these scores is shown in the table below. Criteria Weighting Maximum score Description of activities or services 4 16 Output/Outcome targets 4 16 Staff team 4 16 Individual needs in a group context 4 16 Individual Progress 2 8 Monitoring and Evaluation 2 8 Maximum total Score 80
Guidance_Application_HAGP_2018-20_v01.docx