Response is inadequate in written Response is poor in written communication, Response is inferior in written communication, demonstrated by demonstrated by communication, demonstrated by broad or simplistic ideas that are overly simplistic and sometimes lack of purpose or ideas and understood but often ineffective. unclear ideas that have insufficiently sequencing. attempts at organizing that are developed details. organization that obscures the main inconsistent or ineffective; beginnings and sequencing of ideas that is often just a point. endings that are underdeveloped; list; missing or ineffective details that an attempt that is too short to offer repetitive transitional devices. require reader and inference to coherent development of an idea, if it is developmental details that are uneven, comprehend and follow. stated. somewhat predictable, or leave missing beginning and/or ending. extremely limited vocabulary that information gaps; details not always placed repetitive, monotonous, and often shows no commitment to effectively in the writing. misused words awkwardly strung into communicating a message. reliance on clichés and overused words sentences that are difficult to read sentences with confusing word order that do not connect with the reader; because they are either choppy or that may not permit oral reading. limited audience awareness. rambling; many sentences that begin severe and frequent errors in with repetitive noun + verb pattern. monotonous and sometime misused conventions. words; sentences may sound mechanical, lack of audience awareness. has significant historical although simple constructive are usually little control of basic conventions misinterpretation. correct. resulting in errors impeding no apparent thesis or topic statement. limited control of standard conventions readability. CITATIONS are a pre-requisite for scoring. with significant errors. Contains multiple historical errors Historically accurate but overly general loosely uses background loosely makes connections to some knowledge/facts with no connections. resources. includes a general topic statement, but uses background knowledge/facts with not a thesis some connections. uses more than one document includes a thesis, though it is not very clear. correctly but relies on one document OR cites only one document cites multiple documents correctly Score: FFB 1-2 APR 3 Meets 4 EX 5-6
Response is inadequate in written communication, demonstrated by broad or simplistic ideas that are understood but often ineffective. attempts at organizing that are inconsistent or ineffective; beginnings and endings that are underdeveloped; repetitive transitional devices. developmental details that are uneven, somewhat predictable, or leave information gaps; details not always placed effectively in the writing. reliance on clichés and overused words that do not connect with the reader; limited audience awareness. monotonous and sometime misused words; sentences may sound mechanical, although simple constructive are usually correct. limited control of standard conventions with significant errors. Historically accurate but overly general loosely makes connections to some resources. uses background knowledge/facts with some connections. includes a thesis, though it is not very clear. cites multiple documents correctly Response is poor in written communication, demonstrated by overly simplistic and sometimes unclear ideas that have insufficiently developed details. sequencing of ideas that is often just a list; missing or ineffective details that require reader and inference to comprehend and follow. missing beginning and/or ending. repetitive, monotonous, and often misused words awkwardly strung into sentences that are difficult to read because they are either choppy or rambling; many sentences that begin with repetitive noun + verb pattern. lack of audience awareness. little control of basic conventions resulting in errors impeding readability. Contains multiple historical errors loosely uses background knowledge/facts with no connections. includes a general topic statement, but not a thesis uses more than one document correctly but relies on one document OR cites only one document Response is inferior in written communication, demonstrated by lack of purpose or ideas and sequencing. organization that obscures the main point. an attempt that is too short to offer coherent development of an idea, if it is stated. extremely limited vocabulary that shows no commitment to communicating a message. sentences with confusing word order that may not permit oral reading. severe and frequent errors in conventions. has significant historical misinterpretation. no apparent thesis or topic statement. CITATIONS are a pre-requisite for scoring. Score: FFB 1-2 APR 3 Meets 4 EX 5-6
g_00002_201310011036_9-30-2013-14-Thematic%20Pilot-DBQ%20Form%20A%20manifestdestiny.docx