population. Jun 11 Discuss the impacts of one non-communicable disease. Describes impacts – may drift Begins to develop points with Clear, purposeful analysis of The response will depend on the non-communicable disease selected. into cause. regard to impacts. impacts, This is likely to be coronary heart disease (CHD) or type 2 diabetes, but Ideas generic with limited Support is present – clear Response is precise, any non disease is permissible – such as strokes, cancer. reference to specific disease. reference to selected disease elaborated with detailed The content will vary, depending on the disease chosen. Limited support. – likely to focus on economic reference to selected disease The mark scheme is written using CHD – but there are generic points that Points may be random. consequences. – a broader view of impacts is indicate universal application. There are aspects of present, although focus will Consequences are likely to relate to impact on health, economic debate/discussion with some remain economic. development and lifestyle as prescribed in the specification. Thus, the review of relative importance Clear/explicit impact on life expectancy, quality of life, and the reduced ability to live a of aspects of impacts discussion/debate with ‘normal’ life as walking becomes difficult etc. Reference may be made to recognition of relative impact on families and their lives – as carers for example with reference importance of difficult types to lifestyle. There may be reference to linked risks – such as obesity, of consequences. smoking. Economic consequences are likely to be to the fore. People may be unable to work and the cost of treatment and its impact on other budgets such as education, infrastructure may be discussed. There may be discussion of costs linked to trying to reduce the risks regarding education, advertising campaigns regarding healthy lifestyles or policies to reduce the incidence such as banning smoking in public places
population. Jun 11 Discuss the impacts of one non-communicable disease. The response will depend on the non-communicable disease selected. This is likely to be coronary heart disease (CHD) or type 2 diabetes, but any non disease is permissible – such as strokes, cancer. The content will vary, depending on the disease chosen. The mark scheme is written using CHD – but there are generic points that indicate universal application. Consequences are likely to relate to impact on health, economic development and lifestyle as prescribed in the specification. Thus, the impact on life expectancy, quality of life, and the reduced ability to live a ‘normal’ life as walking becomes difficult etc. Reference may be made to impact on families and their lives – as carers for example with reference to lifestyle. There may be reference to linked risks – such as obesity, smoking. Economic consequences are likely to be to the fore. People may be unable to work and the cost of treatment and its impact on other budgets such as education, infrastructure may be discussed. There may be discussion of costs linked to trying to reduce the risks regarding education, advertising campaigns regarding healthy lifestyles or policies to reduce the incidence such as banning smoking in public places Describes impacts – may drift into cause. Ideas generic with limited reference to specific disease. Limited support. Points may be random. Begins to develop points with regard to impacts. Support is present – clear reference to selected disease – likely to focus on economic consequences. There are aspects of debate/discussion with some review of relative importance of aspects of impacts Clear, purposeful analysis of impacts, Response is precise, elaborated with detailed reference to selected disease – a broader view of impacts is present, although focus will remain economic. Clear/explicit discussion/debate with recognition of relative importance of difficult types of consequences.
GEOG1Essays.docx