and manage a performed. patient satisfactorily. To Patients The Average total cost Comparator: conduct being effectiveness per patient The selection an referred evidence was of the 2009 from from a comparator SAF analysis primary was teledermatology: of a care versus comparative appropriate. €79.78 centres study -Time with care conducted Conventional: for between €129.37 Validity of skin patients March 2004 estimate of (p < 0.005) cancers. with and July measure of system 2005. effectiveness March for the skin Average cost for 2004 routine cancers. travel per patient and Cost triage of The July components skin effectiveness 2005. include fixed cancer evidence came SAF costs patients. from a clinical teledermatology: (Equipment, A trial, which €6.01 e.g. was computer, Conventional: appropriate digital €13.2 for the study camera) and question. variable and costs Average lost (Preparation productivity cost analysis Validity of and per patient under a estimate of submission societal measure of of benefit
and manage a patient satisfactorily. performed. 2009 To conduct an analysis of a system for the routine triage of skin cancer patients. A and analysis under a societal Patients being referred from primary care centres with skin cancers. -Time March 2004 and July 2005. versus care for patients with skin cancers. The effectiveness evidence was from a comparative study conducted between March 2004 and July 2005. Cost components include fixed costs (Equipment, e.g. computer, digital camera) and variable costs (Preparation and submission of Average total cost per patient SAF teledermatology: €79.78 Conventional: €129.37 (p < 0.005) Average cost for travel per patient SAF teledermatology: €6.01 Conventional: €13.2 Average lost productivity cost per patient Comparator: The selection of the comparator was appropriate. Validity of estimate of measure of effectiveness The effectiveness evidence came from a clinical trial, which was appropriate for the study question. Validity of estimate of measure of benefit
1360%20-%20FinalAssessmentReport%20-accessible.docx