Grading Rubric for Game Theory CRP A B C D F Accurately relates Accurately Incorrectly Incorrectly chess, Economic relates at least relates at least relates at least Does not campaigning, two of the two of the four three of the four write to the Analysis conflict and (up to 10 components to components to components to proscribed strategic behavior economic economic economic assignment. points) to economics analysis. analysis. analysis. analysis. Written analysis Written Written analysis coherently relates analysis Written is less coherent, Written Mechanics the four raises major analysis is less and there are analysis is (up to 10 components to literacy coherent; minor significant difficult to points) economic analysis. concerns. typos. grammatical follow. Few typographical errors. errors.
Grading Rubric for Game Theory CRP A B C D F Economic Analysis (up to 10 points) Accurately relates chess, campaigning, conflict and strategic behavior to economics analysis. Accurately relates at least two of the components to economic analysis. Incorrectly relates at least two of the four components to economic analysis. Incorrectly relates at least three of the four components to economic analysis. Does not write to the proscribed assignment. Mechanics (up to 10 points) Written analysis coherently relates the four components to economic analysis. Few typographical errors. Written analysis is less coherent; minor typos. Written analysis is less coherent, and there are significant grammatical errors. Written analysis is difficult to follow. Written analysis raises major literacy concerns.
game_theory_crp_grading.docx