Table 2: Comparison of mean HbA1cSK and mean HbA1cLAB between the participants who reported HbA1cSK and those who did not Reported Had not t Mean difference P Levene’s –test Test between the two HbA1cSK reported For groups Equality of HbA1cSK Variance (F) (95% Confidence Intervals) Eta –squared [N1] [N2] p (df) (eta 2) Mean HbA1cSK 7.5 (14.4) Not Not Not Not applicable Not applicable applicable applicable applicable in % (SD) [3753] Mean recorded 7.1 (1.1) 7.2 (1.3) F = 33.90 -4.31 -0.12 p < 0.05 HbA1cLAB in % (SD) [3722] [3316] p <0.0001 (6554) (-0.18 to - 0.07) eta 2 = 0.003
Table 2: Comparison of mean HbA1cSK and mean HbA1cLAB between the participants who reported HbA1cSK and those who did not Reported HbA1cSK [N1] Had not reported HbA1cSK [N2] Levene’s Test For Equality of Variance (F) p t –test (df) Mean difference between the two groups (95% Confidence Intervals) P Eta –squared (eta 2) Mean HbA1cSK in % (SD) 7.5 (14.4) [3753] Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Mean recorded HbA1cLAB in % (SD) 7.1 (1.1) [3722] 7.2 (1.3) [3316] F = 33.90 p <0.0001 -4.31 (6554) -0.12 (-0.18 to - 0.07) p < 0.05 eta 2 = 0.003
Full%20Manuscript%20%20-%20Self-knowledge%20of%20HbA1c%20%26%20glycaemic%20control.docx