half-day off indirect costs did from work not alter the Validity of for the results, estimate of patient or a although the TD costs family costs were more member. comparable with The price UC costs. The authors year was stated 2001 in US explicitly the -An incremental dollars. perspective cost-effectiveness that was ratio was adopted in the calculated to study. combine the costs Detailed and benefits of information the alternative on the cost diagnostic items included strategies. In the was provided, base-case analysis, although the the incremental costs were cost per patient presented as per day of time to initial definitive intervention Therefore, the saved with TD unit costs over UC was were not $0.17. The results given. This of the sensitivity reduces the analysis did not possibility of vary in replicating the comparison with analysis. the base-case Similarly,
half-day off from work for the patient or a family member. The price year was 2001 in US dollars. indirect costs did not alter the results, although the TD costs were more comparable with UC costs. -An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to combine the costs and benefits of the alternative diagnostic strategies. In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost per patient per day of time to initial definitive intervention saved with TD over UC was $0.17. The results of the sensitivity analysis did not vary in comparison with the base-case Validity of estimate of costs The authors stated explicitly the perspective that was adopted in the study. Detailed information on the cost items included was provided, although the costs were presented as Therefore, the unit costs were not given. This reduces the possibility of replicating the analysis. Similarly,
1360%20-%20FinalAssessmentReport%20-accessible.docx