List of tables Table 1: Impacts of the Commissioning Framework and how they will be demonstrated 13 Table 2: Some possible approaches to procurement 42 Table 3: Funding model options 50 Table A.1: Members of the Steering Group 63 Table A.2: Members of the Advisory Group 64 Table A.3: Blueprint II priorities 66 Table A.4: The ABCD overarching goals and desired results of Rising to the Challenge 67 Table A.5: Legislative requirements that apply to the mental health and addiction sector 71 Table A.6: A comparison of the United Kingdom’s World Class Commissioning and the Ministry of Health’s outcome framework 75 Table A.7: A comparison of the objectives of the English mental health strategy and Rising to the Challenge 77 List of figures The Commissioning Framework for mental health and addiction vii Figure 1: The New Zealand Triple Aim for quality improvement 11 Figure 2: Intervention logic diagram 13 Figure 3: The Commissioning Framework for Mental Health and Addiction 15 Figure A.1: Project structure 63 Figure A.2: The Ministry of Health’s outcomes framework 68 Figure A.3: Whānau Ora commissioning cycle 80 Executive summary The Commissioning Framework for Mental Health and Addiction aims to place people at the centre of commissioning to achieve equitable outcomes, wherever people live and whatever their circumstances. It is part of an outcomes-focused approach intended to shift the focus from ‘how’ things are done to outcomes that will make a real difference for people experiencing mental health and/or addiction. The Commissioning Framework provides a nationally consistent approach to commissioning that supports the direction set for delivering mental health and addiction services in Rising to the Challenge (Ministry of Health 2012) both now and in the future. It takes into account the social determinants of health by taking a much broader approach to health and wellbeing. Commissioning is defined as:
List of tables Table 1: Impacts of the Commissioning Framework and how they will be demonstrated 13 Table 2: Some possible approaches to procurement 42 Table 3: Funding model options 50 Table A.1: Members of the Steering Group 63 Table A.2: Members of the Advisory Group 64 Table A.3: Blueprint II priorities 66 Table A.4: The ABCD overarching goals and desired results of Rising to the Challenge 67 Table A.5: Legislative requirements that apply to the mental health and addiction sector 71 Table A.6: A comparison of the United Kingdom’s World Class Commissioning and the Ministry of Health’s outcome framework 75 Table A.7: A comparison of the objectives of the English mental health strategy and Rising to the Challenge 77 List of figures The Commissioning Framework for mental health and addiction vii Figure 1: The New Zealand Triple Aim for quality improvement 11 Figure 2: Intervention logic diagram 13 Figure 3: The Commissioning Framework for Mental Health and Addiction 15 Figure A.1: Project structure 63 Figure A.2: The Ministry of Health’s outcomes framework 68 Figure A.3: Whānau Ora commissioning cycle 80 Executive summary The Commissioning Framework for Mental Health and Addiction aims to place people at the centre of commissioning to achieve equitable outcomes, wherever people live and whatever their circumstances. It is part of an outcomes-focused approach intended to shift the focus from ‘how’ things are done to outcomes that will make a real difference for people experiencing mental health and/or addiction. The Commissioning Framework provides a nationally consistent approach to commissioning that supports the direction set for delivering mental health and addiction services in Rising to the Challenge (Ministry of Health 2012) both now and in the future. It takes into account the social determinants of health by taking a much broader approach to health and wellbeing. Commissioning is defined as:
guide-to-commissioning-framework-mental-health-addiction-consultation-sep15-v2.docx