Full application evaluation criteria for LOT 1 STAGE 2 FULL APPLICATIONS for LOT 1 will be evaluated against the following criteria: – Category Description of criteria Maximum points under category Relevance Score transferred from the concept note 18 evaluation Clarity and quality of proposed action 20 3.1. The activities are realistic, contributing to project 7 results and objectives and well thought out for the proposed time frame 3.2. The detailed roles and responsibilities of 7 partners are well defined and clear 3.3. The roles and responsibilities of the 6 implementation team are well defined and clear Clarity of proposed budget 20 4.1. The budget is well balanced (the ratio of 7 estimated costs to expected results is satisfactory) 4.2. Are the activities envisaged in the proposal 7 properly reflected in the budget? 4.3 Is the ratio of administrative to programme 6 activities met? Sustainability of results beyond project 15 5.1. The applicant has well explained what actions 15 are envisaged in innovative idea so it is ready for testing. 6. Quality of monitoring plan and evaluation 12 6.1. The methods of collecting evidence to verify 6 results achieved are clear 6.2. The indicators are technically correct (measure 6 objectives, activities and results) 7. Capacity of applicant and partners 15 7.1 Relevant experience and/or expertise for the 8 topic 7.2. Managerial capacities 7 MAXIMUM POINTS 100 The maximum score on the full application is 100. Full application evaluation criteria for LOT 2 and LOT 3
Full application evaluation criteria for LOT 1 STAGE 2 – FULL APPLICATIONS for LOT 1 will be evaluated against the following criteria: Category Description of criteria under category Maximum points Relevance Score transferred from the concept note evaluation 18 Clarity and quality of proposed action 20 3.1. The activities are realistic, contributing to project results and objectives and well thought out for the proposed time frame 7 3.2. The detailed roles and responsibilities of partners are well defined and clear 7 3.3. The roles and responsibilities of the implementation team are well defined and clear 6 Clarity of proposed budget 20 4.1. The budget is well balanced (the ratio of estimated costs to expected results is satisfactory) 7 4.2. Are the activities envisaged in the proposal properly reflected in the budget? 7 4.3 Is the ratio of administrative to programme activities met? 6 Sustainability of results beyond project 15 5.1. The applicant has well explained what actions are envisaged in innovative idea so it is ready for testing. 15 6. Quality of monitoring plan and evaluation 12 6.1. The methods of collecting evidence to verify results achieved are clear 6 6.2. The indicators are technically correct (measure objectives, activities and results) 6 7. Capacity of applicant and partners 15 7.1 Relevant experience and/or expertise for the topic 8 7.2. Managerial capacities 7 MAXIMUM POINTS 100 The maximum score on the full application is 100. Full application evaluation criteria for LOT 2 and LOT 3
Guidelines-for-Applicants_10.-maj_final.docx