The methods used for formulating recommendations are Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: described (describe in detail which methods were used- e.g. Comments: informal consensus or formal consensus such as Delhi, Glaser Action required: techniques...) Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Health benefits, side effects and risks have been considered Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: (describe in detail how these have been considered when making Comments: recommendations) Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 1 (CS team): There is an explicit link between recommendations and Criteria met: supporting evidence (describe how each component of the body Comments: of evidence have been made relevant to each recommendation) Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 1 (CS team): The guideline has been externally reviewed by experts prior to Criteria met: publication (describe which external specialty groups and Comments: stakeholder organisations have been consulted and how the Action required: review has been carried out) Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 1 (CS team): State the procedure for updating the guideline (describe the Criteria met: update process and when the guideline will be updated) Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: 4. Clarity and presentation The recommendations are specific and unambiguous (include the Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: list of recommendations) Comments: Action required:
The methods used for formulating recommendations are described (describe in detail which methods were used- e.g. informal consensus or formal consensus such as Delhi, Glaser techniques...) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Health benefits, side effects and risks have been considered (describe in detail how these have been considered when making recommendations) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: There is an explicit link between recommendations and supporting evidence (describe how each component of the body of evidence have been made relevant to each recommendation) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: The guideline has been externally reviewed by experts prior to publication (describe which external specialty groups and stakeholder organisations have been consulted and how the review has been carried out) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: State the procedure for updating the guideline (describe the update process and when the guideline will be updated) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: Reviewer 2 (QIC lead): Criteria met: Comments: Action required: 4. Clarity and presentation The recommendations are specific and unambiguous (include the list of recommendations) Reviewer 1 (CS team): Criteria met: Comments: Action required:
Guideline_Methodology_Assessment_-_form.docx