infrastructure lifestyle; erosion of community values Increased heavy vehicle traffic Willingness to reserve judgement Land access/community rights lack of Native flora and fauna – Desire for accurate information compensation Employment Opposition to mining activity Social fabric Distrust of Kalbar and/or approvals process Visual, dust (including radiation) and noise impacts Community services and infrastructure Safety and human health impacts Broader Community Economic and employment benefits Attitudes to mining in competition with Impact on image of the region (BC) – Supply of goods and services farming and tourism Water requirements and potential impacts on water The broader regional community, Diversification of income Attitudes to the land legacy for the future; resources – not resident in the immediate area Social/community sustainable management of resources Environmental impacts on surrounding areas, water benefits investment in social bodies, etc. – infrastructure Employment Willingness to reserve judgement Community services and infrastructure Local Members of Parliament (MP) State Government policy Pressure from community Employment opportunities Need for regional economic growth Potential for lack of bilateral support for the New industry for Gippsland adding to economic MLA Gippsland East Employment project diversity MLA Gippsland South Community infrastructure Adverse media coverage Increased heavy vehicle traffic MHR Gippsland Pressure from lobby groups Transport options and routes MLCs Eastern Victoria Water resources Environmental impacts Social fabric State Government Ministers (SG) State Government policy Pressure from community Employment opportunities Need for regional economic growth Internal disagreement on support for the New industry for Gippsland adding to economic Need for assessment of project diversity project’s All relevant Ministers effect on the environment Adverse media coverage Transport options and routes Employment Pressure from lobby groups Water resources Community infrastructure Environmental impacts Mineral royalties Social fabric Sustainable resource development State Government agencies (SGA) State Government policy Under resourced and variable detailed Accountabilities Adequate information to inform technical expertise Complexity of approvals process statutory decisions Conflicting inter-departmental priorities Increased heavy vehicle traffic Need for economic growth Pressure from lobby groups Transport options and routes All relevant agencies and statutory Employment Community expectations Amenity of neighbouring landholders authorities Community infrastructure Complex accountabilities Water requirements and potential impacts on water In charge of investment facilitation, resources and designated waterways
infrastructure Willingness to reserve judgement Desire for accurate information lifestyle; erosion of community values Land access/community rights – lack of compensation Opposition to mining activity Distrust of Kalbar and/or approvals process Increased heavy vehicle traffic Native flora and fauna Employment Social fabric Visual, dust (including radiation) and noise impacts Community services and infrastructure Safety and human health impacts Broader Community (BC) The broader regional community, not resident in the immediate area Economic and employment benefits Supply of goods and services Diversification of income Social/community benefits – investment in social infrastructure Willingness to reserve judgement Attitudes to mining – in competition with farming and tourism Attitudes to the land – legacy for the future; sustainable management of resources Impact on image of the region Water requirements and potential impacts on water resources Environmental impacts on surrounding areas, water bodies, etc. Employment Community services and infrastructure Local Members of Parliament (MP) MLA Gippsland East MLA Gippsland South MHR Gippsland MLCs Eastern Victoria State Government policy Need for regional economic growth Employment Community infrastructure Pressure from community Potential for lack of bilateral support for the project Adverse media coverage Pressure from lobby groups Employment opportunities New industry for Gippsland adding to economic diversity Increased heavy vehicle traffic Transport options and routes Water resources Environmental impacts Social fabric State Government Ministers (SG) All relevant Ministers State Government policy Need for regional economic growth Need for assessment of project’s effect on the environment Employment Community infrastructure Mineral royalties Sustainable resource development Pressure from community Internal disagreement on support for the project Adverse media coverage Pressure from lobby groups Employment opportunities New industry for Gippsland adding to economic diversity Transport options and routes Water resources Environmental impacts Social fabric State Government agencies (SGA) All relevant agencies and statutory authorities State Government policy Adequate information to inform statutory decisions Need for economic growth Employment Community infrastructure In charge of investment facilitation, Under resourced and variable detailed technical expertise Conflicting inter-departmental priorities Pressure from lobby groups Community expectations Complex accountabilities Accountabilities Complexity of approvals process Increased heavy vehicle traffic Transport options and routes Amenity of neighbouring landholders Water requirements and potential impacts on water resources and designated waterways
Fingerboards-Mineral-Sands-Project-EES-Consultation-Plan-May-2017.docx