You apply invalid or and pasted into what effectiveness. You the difference between reasonable and irrelevant criteria to you write. Your try to integrate valid and invalid evidence insightful the issue at hand, or attempts to apply what you have and argument, and you conclusions. Your you don’t use any accepted criteria to learned into your demonstrate biases and essay demonstrates criteria for making the issue at hand own thinking, but fallacies. Based on your sound reasoning: judgements or don’t work and are this integration reading, you draw you show that you evaluations. Your unpersuasive. When may be clunky or thoughtful, valid, and understand the conclusions are making evaluations incomplete or convincing conclusions. difference between unclear or you do not draw rudimentary. You The instructor may feel valid and invalid unreasonable. Your reasonable or clear make an attempt to that these conclusions are evidence and essay fails to conclusions. Your apply accepted familiar, but you present argument, and you demonstrate sound essay fails to clearly criteria to the issue them in an interesting convincingly point reasoning. You do not demonstrate sound at hand in making way. out biases and demonstrate a clear reasoning: it’s not evaluations, and fallacies in a subtle understanding of the always clear that you you try to draw and sophisticated difference between understand the reasonable way. Based on your valid and invalid difference between conclusions, but reading, you draw evidence and valid and invalid there may be some thoughtful, valid, argument. You fall evidence and shaky reasoning in convincing and prey to biases and argument. You fall your essay. interesting fallacies rather than prey to biases and Overally, your essay conclusions. The contest them. You do fallacies rather than demonstrates instructor feels that not draw valid contest them. You do sound reasoning, she has learned conclusions based on not draw valid however, even if something your reading. The conclusions based on it’s not always significant. reader feels your reading. The smoothly written. unconvinced or reader feels With some unpersuaded, and unconvinced or exceptions, you may even feel bored. unpersuaded, and show that you may even feel bored. understand the difference between valid and invalid evidence and argument, and you try to point out biases and fallacies, although you may do so in an
You apply invalid or irrelevant criteria to the issue at hand, or you don’t use any criteria for making judgements or evaluations. Your conclusions are unclear or unreasonable. Your essay fails to demonstrate sound reasoning. You do not demonstrate a clear understanding of the difference between valid and invalid evidence and argument. You fall prey to biases and fallacies rather than contest them. You do not draw valid conclusions based on your reading. The reader feels unconvinced or unpersuaded, and may even feel bored. and pasted into what you write. Your attempts to apply accepted criteria to the issue at hand don’t work and are unpersuasive. When making evaluations you do not draw reasonable or clear conclusions. Your essay fails to clearly demonstrate sound reasoning: it’s not always clear that you understand the difference between valid and invalid evidence and argument. You fall prey to biases and fallacies rather than contest them. You do not draw valid conclusions based on your reading. The reader feels unconvinced or unpersuaded, and may even feel bored. effectiveness. You try to integrate what you have learned into your own thinking, but this integration may be clunky or incomplete or rudimentary. You make an attempt to apply accepted criteria to the issue at hand in making evaluations, and you try to draw reasonable conclusions, but there may be some shaky reasoning in your essay. Overally, your essay demonstrates sound reasoning, however, even if it’s not always smoothly written. With some exceptions, you show that you understand the difference between valid and invalid evidence and argument, and you try to point out biases and fallacies, although you may do so in an the difference between valid and invalid evidence and argument, and you demonstrate biases and fallacies. Based on your reading, you draw thoughtful, valid, and convincing conclusions. The instructor may feel that these conclusions are familiar, but you present them in an interesting way. reasonable and insightful conclusions. Your essay demonstrates sound reasoning: you show that you understand the difference between valid and invalid evidence and argument, and you convincingly point out biases and fallacies in a subtle and sophisticated way. Based on your reading, you draw thoughtful, valid, convincing and interesting conclusions. The instructor feels that she has learned something significant.
GRADING-CRITERIA-FOR-WRITING-122-ESSAYS.docx