Probing Questions Answer/Discussion Evidence (previous 5 Gap (yes/no; if a gap years, exist-explain) qualitative/quantitative, and reliable) How does the Mission is reviewed annually by a broad campus collective to ensure Fall Fling Maybe- evidence of the institution ensure that it continues to match college ideals, student needs, and community Curriculum COR curriculum being all institutional needs. review schedule; specifically compared to offerings align with Course curriculum is reviewed as scheduled every 2-3 years as part Making Decisions mission was not readily the stated mission of of Curriculum Committee (College Standing documentation of found. Retrospectively, we the institution? governance group Curriculum Committee can probably link every Over the past few years with budget cuts, many conversations have Charter course in a table to portions occurred among faculty and the Division, department of the mission. What I administration discussing “coring” curriculum to focus on basic skills, transfer (AA-T & AS-T) and meeting minutes, Dean is prospectively don’t see career tech. IGETC chart of course how we ensure every All courses have SLOs that can be mapped to PLO/ILO which link course is aligned with the offerings, Ya’ll Comes to the mission (?), MC Collaborative, mission. Fall Fling (2011) TracDat and CurriUNET; Mapped connection graphic??? How does the Curriculum reviewed as scheduled by Curriculum Committee Curriculum schedule of No gap institution ensure that 100% of courses are measured for Continuous Quality Improvement COR review its programs and in a sustained process evaluation of and Lisa Putnam reports SLO’s PLO’s services are high Services and programs are evaluated annually through the Program and Julie Campbell, quality and Planning Process examples on Trackdat appropriate to an Program Plans in institution of higher TracDat and EVP education? Summaries How does the For CTE, SCANS and input from advisory committee COR Scans, Program No institution choose the Discussions at department meetings and annual Program Planning Plan Scans, advisory fields of study in meeting in January committee meetings which it offers Faculty collaborate on courses/program content when writing CORs Dept. meeting minutes, programs? using CurricUNET EVP summary, Dept. Chairs in collaboration with the Dean determine the courses to Faculty meetings, offer each semester approval signature sheet in CurricUNET AFT Contract, emails between faculty and deans How does the Curriculum is reviewed routinely See Curriculum No
Probing Questions Answer/Discussion Evidence (previous 5 years, qualitative/quantitative, and reliable) Gap (yes/no; if a gap exist-explain) How does the institution ensure that all institutional offerings align with the stated mission of the institution? Mission is reviewed annually by a broad campus collective to ensure it continues to match college ideals, student needs, and community needs. Course curriculum is reviewed as scheduled every 2-3 years as part of Curriculum Committee (College Standing governance group Over the past few years with budget cuts, many conversations have occurred among faculty and administration discussing “coring” the curriculum to focus on basic skills, transfer (AA-T & AS-T) and career tech. All courses have SLOs that can be mapped to PLO/ILO which link to the mission Fall Fling Curriculum COR review schedule; Making Decisions documentation of Curriculum Committee Charter Division, department meeting minutes, Dean IGETC chart of course offerings, Ya’ll Comes (?), MC Collaborative, Fall Fling (2011) TracDat and CurriUNET; Mapped connection graphic??? Maybe- evidence of the curriculum being specifically compared to mission was not readily found. Retrospectively, we can probably link every course in a table to portions of the mission. What I don’t see is prospectively how we ensure every course is aligned with the mission. How does the institution ensure that its programs and services are high quality and appropriate to an institution of higher education? Curriculum reviewed as scheduled by Curriculum Committee 100% of courses are measured for Continuous Quality Improvement in a sustained process evaluation of SLO’s and PLO’s Services and programs are evaluated annually through the Program Planning Process Curriculum schedule of COR review Lisa Putnam reports and Julie Campbell, examples on Trackdat Program Plans in TracDat and EVP Summaries No gap How does the institution choose the fields of study in which it offers programs? For CTE, SCANS and input from advisory committee Discussions at department meetings and annual Program Planning meeting in January Faculty collaborate on courses/program content when writing CORs using CurricUNET Dept. Chairs in collaboration with the Dean determine the courses to offer each semester COR Scans, Program Plan Scans, advisory committee meetings Dept. meeting minutes, EVP summary, Faculty meetings, approval signature sheet in CurricUNET AFT Contract, emails between faculty and deans No How does the Curriculum is reviewed routinely See Curriculum No
Gap_Analysis_All_Standards.docx