conflict, the student must communicate with the teacher within one week of the project being five (5) entries. assigned (August 18th, 2017). For each novel, students will complete no fewer than Most entries will stem from the student’s understanding of the following terms: Point of View , Internal Conflict, External Conflict, Simile, Metaphor, Diction, Theme, Tone, Foreshadowing, and Personification; however, new terms will be added throughout the year and should be demonstrated. All terms are expected to be used at least once within all combined DJ’s. Rubric: Exemplary Proficient Does not meet standard • Demonstrates strong reading • Demonstrates reading • Fails to demonstrate reading comprehension comprehension comprehension • Details are accurate;no • Significant details are accurate • Contains erroneous Evidence of reading erroneous information • Identifies obvious connections information or lack of sufficient • Identifies obvious and subtle between significant details connections between significant scenes/lines/plot points, etc. • Fails to make connections scenes/lines/plot points, etc between significant moments • Analysis clearly “shows” rather • Analysis attempts to “show”, • Analysis does not “show” than “tells” not “tell” (i.e.:does not rely on textual • Explores how the words/ideas • Able to express significance of evidence) contained within selected selected quotes • Fails to adequately express Textual analysis quotes express significance • Textual evidence matches the significance of selected quotes • Textual evidence is focused to ideas contained in analysis • Ideas in analysis not directly exactly the words necessary for connected to textual evidence analysis Broad selection of textual • Adequate selection of textual • Insufficient selection of textual evidence evidence evidence • Covers a wide variety of • Covers a variety of characters, • Fails to cover a variety of characters, scenes, scenes, themes/motifs, symbols, characters, scenes, Depth themes/motifs, symbols, etc. etc. themes/motifs, symbols, etc. • Response demonstrates • Response adequately analyzes • Response lacks analysis (i.e.: thorough analysis, perception, the significance of the quote summary, questions, and original thought predictions, etc.) and/or original thought Notes:
conflict, the student must communicate with the teacher within one week of the project being assigned (August 18th, 2017). For each novel, students will complete no fewer than five (5) entries. Most entries will stem from the student’s understanding of the following terms: Point of View , Internal Conflict, External Conflict, Simile, Metaphor, Diction, Theme, Tone, Foreshadowing, and Personification; however, new terms will be added throughout the year and should be demonstrated. All terms are expected to be used at least once within all combined DJ’s. Rubric: Exemplary Proficient Does not meet standard Evidence of reading • Demonstrates strong reading comprehension • Details are accurate;no erroneous information • Identifies obvious and subtle connections between significant scenes/lines/plot points, etc • Demonstrates reading comprehension • Significant details are accurate • Identifies obvious connections between significant scenes/lines/plot points, etc. • Fails to demonstrate reading comprehension • Contains erroneous information or lack of sufficient details • Fails to make connections between significant moments Textual analysis • Analysis clearly “shows” rather than “tells” • Explores how the words/ideas contained within selected quotes express significance • Textual evidence is focused to exactly the words necessary for analysis • Analysis attempts to “show”, not “tell” • Able to express significance of selected quotes • Textual evidence matches the ideas contained in analysis • Analysis does not “show” (i.e.:does not rely on textual evidence) • Fails to adequately express significance of selected quotes • Ideas in analysis not directly connected to textual evidence Depth Broad selection of textual evidence • Covers a wide variety of characters, scenes, themes/motifs, symbols, etc. • Response demonstrates thorough analysis, perception, and original thought • Adequate selection of textual evidence • Covers a variety of characters, scenes, themes/motifs, symbols, etc. • Response adequately analyzes the significance of the quote • Insufficient selection of textual evidence • Fails to cover a variety of characters, scenes, themes/motifs, symbols, etc. • Response lacks analysis (i.e.: summary, questions, predictions, etc.) and/or original thought Notes:
GQYT2o91CwXLmlK3Hnud8Gm16i21CiKSbRbdZlTItspQvCaq.docx