they will be delivered and the impact that they will have on other areas/stakeholders. Good 4 Sufficient evidence Will reflect that bidders will have provided of addressed, in some detail, all or the appropriate majority of the bullet points listed under knowledge, skills or each criteria heading. Evidence will experience. Have have been provided to show not only confidence in their what will be provided but will give some ability to deliver the detail of how this will be achieved. required service Bidders should make clear how their proposals relate directly to the aims of the project and be specific, rather than general, in the way proposed solutions will deliver the desired outcomes Acceptable 3 Reasonable evidence Will again address the majority of the of appropriate bullet points under each criteria heading knowledge, skills or but will lack some clarity or detail in experience. Meets how the proposed solutions will be requirements in achieved. Evidence provided, while many areas but not giving generic or general statements, is all. not specifically directed toward the aims/objectives of this project. Any significant omission of key information as identified under each criteria heading will point towards a score of 3. Minor 2 Some evidence of Will reflect that the bidder has not Reservation appropriate provided evidence to suggest how they knowledge, skills or will address a number of bullet points experience. Meets under the evaluation criteria heading. requirements in Tenders will in parts be sketchy with some areas but with little or no detail given of how they will important omissions meet project requirements. Evidence provided is considered weak or inappropriate and is unclear on how this relates to desired outcomes. Serious 1 Very little evidence Will reflect that there are major Reservations of appropriate weaknesses or gaps in the information knowledge skills or provided. The bidder displays poor experience understanding and there are major doubts about fitness for purpose. Unacceptable 0 No Will result if no response is given and/or evidence/response if the response is not acceptable and/or does not cover the required criteria.
they will be delivered and the impact that they will have on other areas/stakeholders. Good 4 Sufficient evidence provided of appropriate knowledge, skills or experience. Have confidence in their ability to deliver the required service Will reflect that bidders will have addressed, in some detail, all or the majority of the bullet points listed under each criteria heading. Evidence will have been provided to show not only what will be provided but will give some detail of how this will be achieved. Bidders should make clear how their proposals relate directly to the aims of the project and be specific, rather than general, in the way proposed solutions will deliver the desired outcomes Acceptable 3 Reasonable evidence of appropriate knowledge, skills or experience. Meets requirements in many areas but not all. Will again address the majority of the bullet points under each criteria heading but will lack some clarity or detail in how the proposed solutions will be achieved. Evidence provided, while giving generic or general statements, is not specifically directed toward the aims/objectives of this project. Any significant omission of key information as identified under each criteria heading will point towards a score of 3. Minor Reservation 2 Some evidence of appropriate knowledge, skills or experience. Meets requirements in some areas but with important omissions Will reflect that the bidder has not provided evidence to suggest how they will address a number of bullet points under the evaluation criteria heading. Tenders will in parts be sketchy with little or no detail given of how they will meet project requirements. Evidence provided is considered weak or inappropriate and is unclear on how this relates to desired outcomes. Serious Reservations 1 Very little evidence of appropriate knowledge skills or experience Will reflect that there are major weaknesses or gaps in the information provided. The bidder displays poor understanding and there are major doubts about fitness for purpose. Unacceptable 0 No evidence/response Will result if no response is given and/or if the response is not acceptable and/or does not cover the required criteria.
Health-and-Safety-Audit-ITT-Apr-17.docx