analysis. on the cost items included Cost-saving of was provided. €0.65 per waiting day avoided. Authors' conclusions SAF teledermatology is cost-effective for managing referrals in skin cancer clinics in a public health system equipped with an intranet. van This The -The The Efficiency Comparator: der study study efficiency Teledermatology The selection data were prevented 74% of the 2011 from the (n=19741/26596) comparator prospective of physical was the system versus cohort referrals. appropriate. effect of patients study. referred care for a for Quality Validity of Efficiency of on patients estimate of -A TDC was -time SAF was with all costs performed for measured by skin quality
analysis. Cost-saving of €0.65 per waiting day avoided. Authors' conclusions SAF teledermatology is cost-effective for managing referrals in skin cancer clinics in a public health system equipped with an intranet. on the cost items included was provided. van der 2011 This study the effect of on quality The study patients referred for a -The system -time versus care for patients with all skin The efficiency data were from the prospective cohort study. Efficiency of SAF was measured by Efficiency Teledermatology prevented 74% (n=19741/26596) of physical referrals. Quality -A TDC was performed for Comparator: The selection of the comparator was appropriate. Validity of estimate of costs
1360%20-%20FinalAssessmentReport%20-accessible.docx