Validity: Student Threats not identified demonstrates that design is internal validity acceptable for a master’s external validity threats student in terms of statistical conclusion validity considerations of: construct validity threats 5 4 3 2 1 18% (x=3.6) Threats not accurately described or 5 4 3 2 1 Threats to internal validity of poorly described 5% (x=1) the study 5 4 3 2 1 internal validity external validity threats External validity of the study 5% (x=1) 5 4 3 2 1 statistical conclusion validity Statistical conclusion validity 5% (x=1) construct validity threats of the study Threats not adequately controlled in Construct validity of the study variables internal validity external validity threats statistical conclusion validity construct validity threats Writing the response does not address Purpose: Focus Writing on the question a Specific Purpose: 5 4 3 2 1 3% (x=0.6) Thesis & purpose of the answer are focused, & clearly related to the question. Organization and Structure: there is no logical sequence to the All concepts or ideas are information presented 5 4 3 2 1 3% (x=0.6) presented in a logical order the paper lacks a structured introduction, body and conclusion 5 4 3 2 1 0.5% Transitions between ideas response jumps around, it is (x=0.1) enhance presentation difficult to follow many missing or ineffective transitions between ideas/paragraphs information is disjointed Communication: there is confusion as to what is Language clearly & effectively 5 4 3 2 1 4% (x=.8) being said communicates concepts & many grammatical/ ideas; may at times be punctuation/spelling errors nuanced and eloquent 5 4 3 2 1 2.5% quotes are used extensively Minimal errors in spelling, (x=0.5) quotes have little or no relevance grammar, word order, word to the response usage, sentence structure, & 5 3 2 1 quotes are not explained or have 4 punctuation no context 0.5% 5 3 2 1 4 more in-text citations needed Quotes are used sparingly & (x=0.1) they are adequately explained 0.5% & relevant to the issue (x=0.1) Uses in-text citations to document source of material
Validity: Student demonstrates that design is acceptable for a master’s student in terms of considerations of: Threats to internal validity of the study External validity of the study Statistical conclusion validity of the study Construct validity of the variables 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 18% (x=3.6) 5% (x=1) 5% (x=1) 5% (x=1) Threats not identified internal validity external validity threats statistical conclusion validity construct validity threats Threats not accurately described or poorly described internal validity external validity threats statistical conclusion validity construct validity threats Threats not adequately controlled in study internal validity external validity threats statistical conclusion validity construct validity threats Writing Purpose: Focus Writing on a Specific Purpose: Thesis & purpose of the answer are focused, & clearly related to the question. 5 4 3 2 1 3% (x=0.6) the response does not address the question Organization and Structure: All concepts or ideas are presented in a logical order Transitions between ideas enhance presentation 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 3% (x=0.6) 0.5% (x=0.1) there is no logical sequence to the information presented the paper lacks a structured introduction, body and conclusion response jumps around, it is difficult to follow many missing or ineffective transitions between ideas/paragraphs information is disjointed Communication: Language clearly & effectively communicates concepts & ideas; may at times be nuanced and eloquent Minimal errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, sentence structure, & punctuation Quotes are used sparingly & they are adequately explained & relevant to the issue Uses in-text citations to document source of material 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 4% (x=.8) 2.5% (x=0.5) 0.5% (x=0.1) 0.5% (x=0.1) there is confusion as to what is being said many grammatical/ punctuation/spelling errors quotes are used extensively quotes have little or no relevance to the response quotes are not explained or have no context more in-text citations needed
graduatehandbook2018rev8-17-18.docx