Contribution to Strategic Plans and Goals of the Department, College, the Academic Plan of Academic Affairs, and University. While the material in the above described sections will address much of a dossier performance relative to strategic plans and goals, the candidate’s candidate should make sure that any additional evidence regarding performance towards these goals is included in the The dossier. candidate may wish to consider adding a statement that guides reviewers to the evidence in the that relates to strategic plans and goals. dossier 8.1.3.f See Section 9, 10, or 11, as appropriate, for additional details on recommended/required contents for full-time dossier temporary, or faculty. temporary, probationary 8.1.4 Evaluation of Faculty Evidence Teaching Effectiveness – – 8.1.4.a Evaluation of Faculty Evidence Teaching Effectiveness Student – – – Evaluation of Teaching 8.1.4.a.1 Student evaluations of teaching (SETs) serve two purposes: First, the evaluations provide a means of appraising the quality of teaching performance of faculty members; and second, the evaluations should help faculty members improve their teaching and assist in their general professional development. 8.1.4.a.2 Written or electronic student evaluations of teaching (SET) shall be required for all faculty unit employees who teach. All classes taught by each faculty unit employee with six or more enrolled students shall have such student evaluations. See CBA 15.15. 8.1.4.a.3 Each academic may draw up its own Department/Unit instruments and/or procedures subject to approval of the University Student Evaluation of Teaching (USET) Committee. Proposed instruments must Department/Unit include a satisfactory plan for analysis and evaluation of results and shall be submitted for USET Committee approval. 8.1.4.a.3.1 faculty may use the SET instrument Probationary under which their evaluations began for the duration of the period for probationary consistency in SET analysis. faculty Probationary making this choice will communicate it in writing to the College Dean for placement in the PAF, as well as the department chair.
Contribution to Strategic Plans and Goals of the Department, College, the Academic Plan of Academic Affairs, and University. While the material in the above described dossier sections will address much of a candidate’s performance relative to strategic plans and goals, the candidate should make sure that any additional evidence regarding performance towards these goals is included in the dossier. The candidate may wish to consider adding a statement that guides reviewers to the evidence in the dossier that relates to strategic plans and goals. 8.1.3.f See Section 9, 10, or 11, as appropriate, for additional details on recommended/required dossier contents for temporary, full-time temporary, or probationary faculty. 8.1.4 Evaluation of Faculty – Evidence – Teaching Effectiveness 8.1.4.a Evaluation of Faculty – Evidence – Teaching Effectiveness – Student Evaluation of Teaching 8.1.4.a.1 Student evaluations of teaching (SETs) serve two purposes: First, the evaluations provide a means of appraising the quality of teaching performance of faculty members; and second, the evaluations should help faculty members improve their teaching and assist in their general professional development. 8.1.4.a.2 Written or electronic student evaluations of teaching (SET) shall be required for all faculty unit employees who teach. All classes taught by each faculty unit employee with six or more enrolled students shall have such student evaluations. See CBA 15.15. 8.1.4.a.3 Each academic Department/Unit may draw up its own instruments and/or procedures subject to approval of the University Student Evaluation of Teaching (USET) Committee. Proposed Department/Unit instruments must include a satisfactory plan for analysis and evaluation of results and shall be submitted for USET Committee approval. 8.1.4.a.3.1 Probationary faculty may use the SET instrument under which their evaluations began for the duration of the probationary period for consistency in SET analysis. Probationary faculty making this choice will communicate it in writing to the College Dean for placement in the PAF, as well as the department chair.
FPPP1617%20FINAL.docx