4 Award Criteria Tenders will be awarded marks under each of the award criteria listed in this section to determine the most economically advantageous tenders. Price (CIF – DAP Freetown as applicable) Technical Specification / Quality Delivery time See section 5.3 for more details. 5 Post selection References and other checks are found to be clear and quality is assessed. GOAL will convene an evaluation team which may include members of the Finance, Logistics, Programmes, Donor Compliance and Internal Audit, as well as 3rd Party technical input. During the evaluation period clarifications may be sought by e-mail from Tenderers. Clarifications may include testimonials from customers in support of particular aspects of a tender, whether such aspects are contained in the original submission or in subsequent responses to requests for clarification. Deadlines will be imposed for the receipt of such clarifications and failure to meet these deadlines may result in the disqualification of the Tender or loss of marks. Responses to requests for clarification shall not materially change any of the elements of the proposals submitted. Unsolicited communications from Tenderers will not be entertained during the evaluation period. 5.3.1 Price All prices must be in SLL / USD with a clear breakdown of prices must be shown as part of the financial offer – any transport fees, taxes, customs charges, component parts, etc. must be shown separately. Prices offered will be evaluated on full cost basis (including all fees and taxes). Marks for cost will be awarded on the inverse proportion principle (shown below): Scorevendor = maximum score x (pricemin / pricevendor) Scores for the Financial Offer will be calculated by comprising maximum available marks () by inverse proportion: Offered by Tenderer price divided by the minimum price offered in this Tender. 5.3.2 Technical Specification /Quality This is a combination of three elements that will be highlighted in the Technical section but also from responses to the mandatory parts of the submission as follows: 1. Previous experience in similar suppliers to other organisation with confirmed references for that experience – including details of the numbers of vehicles supplied over specific time period. 2. Warranty: 100,000 Km or 3 years warranty including after sales service in country 3. The tenderer should demonstrate evidence of being able to deliver supply within a realistic time frame. 4. Overall quality and any “added value” parts to the proposal
4 Award Criteria Tenders will be awarded marks under each of the award criteria listed in this section to determine the most economically advantageous tenders. Price (CIF – DAP Freetown as applicable) Technical Specification / Quality Delivery time See section 5.3 for more details. 5 Post selection References and other checks are found to be clear and quality is assessed. GOAL will convene an evaluation team which may include members of the Finance, Logistics, Programmes, Donor Compliance and Internal Audit, as well as 3rd Party technical input. During the evaluation period clarifications may be sought by e-mail from Tenderers. Clarifications may include testimonials from customers in support of particular aspects of a tender, whether such aspects are contained in the original submission or in subsequent responses to requests for clarification. Deadlines will be imposed for the receipt of such clarifications and failure to meet these deadlines may result in the disqualification of the Tender or loss of marks. Responses to requests for clarification shall not materially change any of the elements of the proposals submitted. Unsolicited communications from Tenderers will not be entertained during the evaluation period. 5.3.1 Price All prices must be in SLL / USD with a clear breakdown of prices must be shown as part of the financial offer – any transport fees, taxes, customs charges, component parts, etc. must be shown separately. Prices offered will be evaluated on full cost basis (including all fees and taxes). Marks for cost will be awarded on the inverse proportion principle (shown below): Scorevendor = maximum score x (pricemin / pricevendor) Scores for the Financial Offer will be calculated by comprising maximum available marks () by inverse proportion: Offered by Tenderer price divided by the minimum price offered in this Tender. 5.3.2 Technical Specification /Quality This is a combination of three elements that will be highlighted in the Technical section but also from responses to the mandatory parts of the submission as follows: 1. Previous experience in similar suppliers to other organisation with confirmed references for that experience – including details of the numbers of vehicles supplied over specific time period. 2. Warranty: 100,000 Km or 3 years warranty including after sales service in country 3. The tenderer should demonstrate evidence of being able to deliver supply within a realistic time frame. 4. Overall quality and any “added value” parts to the proposal
FRT-IT-13217_Toyota_Land_Cruiser_Final_ITT.docx