Artistic Excellent – Outstanding Good – Very Satisfactory Marginal — Fair Poor Good Clearly Adequate evidence Implied but not Clearly evident and Hard to determine, evident and of artistic specific evidence articulated artistic no evidence aesthetic of artistic aesthetic achievement, provided artistic aesthetic achievement, aesthetic artistic programming on achievement, artistic a superior level and artistic programming continues to evolve programming on remains consistent creatively. Artistic a high level decisions are made by highly qualified personnel or invitees. Organization is a leader in its field in artistic excellence. Program Evaluation Excellent – Good – Very Good Satisfactory Marginal — Fair Poor Outstanding Excellent Evaluation Outlined Effective Fails to address and effective evaluation techniques are in evaluation efforts, evaluation how the techniques that are an place and provide but leaves techniques are organization will ongoing part of the evidence priorities questions as to part of the evaluate it planning process and are achieved. how the planning process programming provide evidence the information is to and provide priorities are achieved. be used evidence priorities Model for the field in are achieved. program evaluation and continued update of evaluation process How Arts Reflect Mission Excellent – Satisfactory Marginal — Fair Good – Very Good Poor Outstanding General statement Statement on how Clear explanation Lacks an on how the the programs and Articulate and clear of how the explanation of programs and services fulfill the explanation of how the programs and how the programs services fulfill the organization’s programs and services services fulfill the and services fulfill organization’s mission is not fully fulfill the organization’s organization’s the organization’s mission, but lacks formed mission. Evident that mission. mission clarity the mission is regularly evaluated
Artistic Excellent – Outstanding Clearly evident and artistic aesthetic achievement, artistic programming on a superior level and continues to evolve creatively. Artistic decisions are made by highly qualified personnel or invitees. Organization is a leader in its field in artistic excellence. Good – Very Good Clearly evident and artistic aesthetic achievement, artistic programming on a high level Satisfactory Adequate evidence of artistic aesthetic achievement, artistic programming remains consistent Marginal — Fair Implied but not specific evidence of artistic aesthetic Poor Hard to determine, no evidence provided Program Evaluation Excellent – Outstanding Excellent and effective evaluation techniques that are an ongoing part of the planning process and provide evidence the priorities are achieved. Model for the field in program evaluation and continued update of evaluation process Good – Very Good Effective evaluation techniques are part of the planning process and provide evidence priorities are achieved. Satisfactory Evaluation techniques are in place and provide evidence priorities are achieved. Marginal — Fair Outlined evaluation efforts, but leaves questions as to how the information is to be used Poor Fails to address how the organization will evaluate it programming How Arts Reflect Mission Excellent – Outstanding Articulate and clear explanation of how the programs and services fulfill the organization’s mission. Evident that the mission is regularly evaluated Good – Very Good Clear explanation of how the programs and services fulfill the organization’s mission. Satisfactory General statement on how the programs and services fulfill the organization’s mission, but lacks clarity Marginal — Fair Statement on how the programs and services fulfill the organization’s mission is not fully formed Poor Lacks an explanation of how the programs and services fulfill the organization’s mission articulated
GFO%20FY2018%20Guidelines%20Final(1).docx