analysis and the method of calculation was explicitly reported. The authors noted that the variable costs could have been because the time spent by clinicians for other duties was not taken into consideration. Pak The aim SAF Comparator: 2009 of this study subjects The selection was to of versus analysis who From a of the perform (a part were previously comparator a cost care. of a being published was referred randomised appropriate. from a controlled analysis control Primary trial of Care Validity of -Time trial) Clinic to estimate of a Direct Costs costs 4
analysis and the method of calculation was explicitly reported. The authors noted that the variable costs could have been because the time spent by clinicians for other duties was not taken into consideration. Pak 2009 The aim of this study was to perform a cost analysis of subjects who were being referred from a Primary Care Clinic to a of -Time 4 SAF versus care. analysis (a part of a trial) From a previously published randomised controlled trial Direct Costs Comparator: The selection of the comparator was appropriate. Validity of estimate of costs control
1360%20-%20FinalAssessmentReport%20-accessible.docx