Proposal Total Transfer Eliminate IFM. Then hierarchical relations remain unaltered. Getting rid of IFM Total Transfer  a. All material in a phase with head H is transferred directly to the interfaces. b. uF on X, if not licensed/valued by H, is interpreted at the interfaces as a specific instruction.  At PF, uF serves as an instruction not to linearize X in Example: (Assuming here no further uFs on V/vdef). Now vdef can be linearized with respect to VP; VP in turn can linearize its parts: but DPuCase will not be PF has interpretations for two objects, but they are not linearized with respect to each other: What PF sees: This is clearly “not yet” convergent, as there is no single string (cf. Epstein & Seely 1999). No order is established between the DP and the vP (cf. Fox & 2004). The DP can be linearized by merging once its Case feature is valued:
Proposal Total Transfer Eliminate IFM. Then hierarchical relations remain unaltered. Getting rid of IFM Total Transfer a. All material in a phase  with head H is transferred directly to the interfaces. b. uF on X, if not licensed/valued by H, is interpreted at the interfaces as a specific instruction. At PF, uF serves as an instruction not to linearize X in  Example: (Assuming here no further uFs on V/vdef). Now vdef can be linearized with respect to VP; VP in turn can linearize its parts: but DPuCase will not be PF has interpretations for two objects, but they are not linearized with respect to each other: What PF sees: This is clearly “not yet” convergent, as there is no single string (cf. Epstein & Seely 1999). No order is established between the DP and the vP (cf. Fox & 2004). The DP can be linearized by merging once its Case feature is valued:
Groat%20Transfer%20Remnants%20Handout%20Frankfurt%20RM%20Conference.docx