While the Review Panel has raised Report No 1, Volume 1, Executive Clause 35a. A summary of the significant concerns about the summary, Chapters 16 and 17, and Review Panel’s reasons for exhibited and revised versions of Volume 2 recommending (or otherwise) the draft Amendment, it considers amendments to the proposed there is enough for it to be planning scheme amendment progressed, subject to the Review Panel’s recommended drafting changes. The track changes are based on the Report No 1, Volume 2 Clause 35b. A track change version Ministers Version C of the proposed planning scheme schedules and clauses The track changes are based on the Report No 1, Volume 2 Clause 35c. Any additional Ministers Version C recommendations for amendments to the proposed Capital City Zone Schedule The Review Panel has Report No 1, Volume 2 Clause 35d. Any additional recommended several recommendations for amendment modifications to the draft to all other proposed planning Amendment, which are included in scheme changes sought by the the track change versions planning scheme amendment The Review Panel considered As the draft Framework is a Clause 35e. Any changes required whether to make changes to the Reference Document to the to the draft Fishermans Bend draft Framework and resolved that Melbourne and Port Phillip Framework as a result of any changes should be made once Planning Scheme, the Review Panel recommendations made to the the Precinct Plans are prepared has not made specific changes. It planning scheme amendment and in place. However, the considers that such changes can be findings and recommendations of made once the final decision is the Review Panel in relation to its made on the draft Amendment impact on the draft Framework and following the completion of Plan should be taken into account the Precinct Plans as this matter progresses A number of issues were raised Report No 1, Volume 1, Chapter 12 Clause 35f. A summary of all that could be considered to be submitters heard that presented outside the specific remit of the on matters outside the Terms of Reference, these consideration of the Review Panel principally related to Governance A total of 255 written submissions The list of submitters and those Clause 35g. A list of persons who were received and considered by who presented at the Hearing is made submissions considered by the Review Panel provided in Appendix B and C of the Review Panel Report No 1, Volume 1
Clause 35a. A summary of the Review Panel’s reasons for recommending (or otherwise) amendments to the proposed planning scheme amendment While the Review Panel has raised significant concerns about the exhibited and revised versions of the draft Amendment, it considers there is enough for it to be progressed, subject to the Review Panel’s recommended drafting changes. Report No 1, Volume 1, Executive summary, Chapters 16 and 17, and Volume 2 Clause 35b. A track change version of the proposed planning scheme schedules and clauses The track changes are based on the Ministers Version C Report No 1, Volume 2 Clause 35c. Any additional recommendations for amendments to the proposed Capital City Zone Schedule The track changes are based on the Ministers Version C Report No 1, Volume 2 Clause 35d. Any additional recommendations for amendment to all other proposed planning scheme changes sought by the planning scheme amendment The Review Panel has recommended several modifications to the draft Amendment, which are included in the track change versions Report No 1, Volume 2 Clause 35e. Any changes required to the draft Fishermans Bend Framework as a result of recommendations made to the planning scheme amendment The Review Panel considered whether to make changes to the draft Framework and resolved that any changes should be made once the Precinct Plans are prepared and in place. However, the findings and recommendations of the Review Panel in relation to its impact on the draft Framework Plan should be taken into account as this matter progresses As the draft Framework is a Reference Document to the Melbourne and Port Phillip Planning Scheme, the Review Panel has not made specific changes. It considers that such changes can be made once the final decision is made on the draft Amendment and following the completion of the Precinct Plans Clause 35f. A summary of all submitters heard that presented on matters outside the consideration of the Review Panel A number of issues were raised that could be considered to be outside the specific remit of the Terms of Reference, these principally related to Governance Report No 1, Volume 1, Chapter 12 Clause 35g. A list of persons who made submissions considered by the Review Panel A total of 255 written submissions were received and considered by the Review Panel The list of submitters and those who presented at the Hearing is provided in Appendix B and C of Report No 1, Volume 1
Fishermans-Bend-Planning-Review-Panel-Report-1-Volume-1.docx