identified through technical therefore enables feedback there is a long list of options to higher score. Thus low need some form of assessment, and the loops to develop. consider. costs score highly, while independent (third party with contribution of these effects, large benefits also score no interest in the final Weightings and scores can be progressively, to elements, more highly. This may outcome) check, review of the modified to reflect evolving components and finally the mean the reversal of scores. understanding of trade offs. overall objectives. The criteria normal measurement themselves are weighted to processes. reflect overall (for example, Weighting of criterion district-wide) objectives. This needs to address the enables options to be scored relative importance of the according to their associated objective to contribution to objectives. which each criterion The best option is that with relates. the highest score, across the relevant criteria. This method can address both efficiency and effectiveness. It identifies both the negative and positive aspects (costs and benefits) and combines them in a structure where outcomes are able to be compared as to benefits relative to costs (both in aggregate, rather than summed), and the extent of objectives achieved (effectiveness). See the
identified through technical assessment, and the contribution of these effects, progressively, to elements, components and finally the overall objectives. The criteria themselves are weighted to reflect overall (for example, district-wide) objectives. This enables options to be scored according to their contribution to objectives. The best option is that with the highest score, across the relevant criteria. This method can address both efficiency and effectiveness. It identifies both the negative and positive aspects (costs and benefits) and combines them in a structure where outcomes are able to be compared as to benefits relative to costs (both in aggregate, rather than summed), and the extent of objectives achieved (effectiveness). therefore enables feedback loops to develop. Weightings and scores can be modified to reflect evolving understanding of trade offs. there is a long list of options to consider. higher score. Thus low costs score highly, while large benefits also score more highly. This may mean the reversal of normal measurement processes. Weighting of criterion needs to address the relative importance of the associated objective to which each criterion relates. need some form of independent (third party with no interest in the final outcome) check, review of the scores. See the
guide-to-section-32-of-resource-manangemnt-amendment-act-1991.docx