Random Effects/Gender Equality Constant (s.d.) 0.01** 0.01** 0.01** (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) Halved chi2 p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 Note: Table entries are multilevel maximum likelihood estimates with robust standard errors in parentheses. ** p<0.01, * p<0.05. Table 3: Variation in Random Intercepts across Gender Equality Frequency Social Media Political > < > < > < μ μ μ μ μ μ Gender Gender Gender Gender Gender Gender Equality Equality Equality Equality Equality Equality Intercepts < 72 % 15 % 53 % 32 % 82 % 44 % μ > 28 % 85 % 47 % 68 % 18 % 56 % μ 0.00 0.00 0.00 Χ2 Table entries are percentages based on the average of the best linear unbiased Note: predictions (BLUPs) of the random intercepts across each of the 5 imputed data sets for each of the respective models, = mean. The p-value represents the probability that μ Χ2 we cannot reject the null hypothesis of cell independence. Figure 1: Gender Equality across Latin American Countries
Random Effects/Gender Equality Constant (s.d.) 0.01** 0.01** 0.01** (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) Halved chi2 p-value 0.00 0.00 0.00 Note: Table entries are multilevel maximum likelihood estimates with robust standard errors in parentheses. ** p<0.01, * p<0.05. Table 3: Variation in Random Intercepts across Gender Equality Frequency Social Media Political < μ Gender Equality > μ Gender Equality < μ Gender Equality > μ Gender Equality < μ Gender Equality > μ Gender Equality Intercepts < μ 72 % 15 % 53 % 32 % 82 % 44 % > μ 28 % 85 % 47 % 68 % 18 % 56 % Χ2 0.00 0.00 0.00 Note: Table entries are percentages based on the average of the best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs) of the random intercepts across each of the 5 imputed data sets for each of the respective models, μ = mean. The Χ2 p-value represents the probability that we cannot reject the null hypothesis of cell independence. Figure 1: Gender Equality across Latin American Countries
Gray%20Gainous%20and%20Wagner%202015.docx