Table 4: A comparison of the participants with accurately reported HbA1cSK and inaccurately reported HbA1cSK Accurately Inaccurately Analysis: Mean difference P reported reported t-test/chi-squared and 95% Eta 2/ phi HbA1cSK HbA1cSK with degrees of confidence freedom (df) intervals (CI) N1 N2 Eta squared (eta 2) Mean 7.0 (1.0) 6.8 (1.5) t = 2.76 (1033) 0.16 p = 0.05 2921 810 (0.04 to 0.27) eta 2 = 0.002 HbA1c in % (SD) Mean recorded 7.0 (1.0) 7.3 (1.2) t = -6.88 (1152) -0.33 p < 0.05 HbA1c in % 2921 810 (-0.42 to -0.23) eta 2 = 0.01 (SD)
Table 4: A comparison of the participants with accurately reported HbA1cSK and inaccurately reported HbA1cSK Accurately reported HbA1cSK N1 Inaccurately reported HbA1cSK N2 Analysis: t-test/chi-squared with degrees of freedom (df) Mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI) Eta squared (eta 2) P Eta 2/ phi Mean HbA1c in % (SD) 7.0 (1.0) 2921 6.8 (1.5) 810 t = 2.76 (1033) 0.16 (0.04 to 0.27) p = 0.05 eta 2 = 0.002 Mean recorded HbA1c in % (SD) 7.0 (1.0) 2921 7.3 (1.2) 810 t = -6.88 (1152) -0.33 (-0.42 to -0.23) p < 0.05 eta 2 = 0.01
Full%20Manuscript%20%20-%20Self-knowledge%20of%20HbA1c%20%26%20glycaemic%20control.docx