Recognised Internet Service Provider (ISP) or Local Infrastructure Authority together with age-related filtering that is actively monitored. Collaboration Practices and procedures are in place to ensure joint working with other relevant agencies. Risk assessment is robust and used to good effect in Monitoring promoting e-safety. and Using data effectively to assess the impact of e-safety Evaluation practice and how this informs strategy. The impact level of personal data is understood and data is managed securely and in accordance with the statutory requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998. Any professional communications that utilise technology Management between the school and pupils/students, their families or of Personal external agencies should: Data take place within clear and explicit professional boundaries be transparent and open to scrutiny not share any personal information with a child or young person. A school may be at risk if: Present? Not Not Present? sure Personal data is often unsecured and/or leaves school site without encryption. Security of passwords is ineffective, for example passwords are shared or common with all but the youngest children. Policies are generic and not updated. There is no progressive, planned e-safety education across the curriculum, for example there is only an assembly held annually. There is no internet filtering or monitoring. There is no evidence of staff training. Children are not aware of how to report a problem.
Infrastructure Recognised Internet Service Provider (ISP) or Local Authority together with age-related filtering that is actively monitored. Collaboration Practices and procedures are in place to ensure joint working with other relevant agencies. Monitoring and Evaluation Risk assessment is robust and used to good effect in promoting e-safety. Using data effectively to assess the impact of e-safety practice and how this informs strategy. Management of Personal Data The impact level of personal data is understood and data is managed securely and in accordance with the statutory requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998. Any professional communications that utilise technology between the school and pupils/students, their families or external agencies should: take place within clear and explicit professional boundaries be transparent and open to scrutiny not share any personal information with a child or young person. A school may be at risk if: Present? Not Present? Not sure Personal data is often unsecured and/or leaves school site without encryption. Security of passwords is ineffective, for example passwords are shared or common with all but the youngest children. Policies are generic and not updated. There is no progressive, planned e-safety education across the curriculum, for example there is only an assembly held annually. There is no internet filtering or monitoring. There is no evidence of staff training. Children are not aware of how to report a problem.
good_to_excellent_e_safety_guidance_checklist.docx