--- Evaluation ends here. --- Thank you very much for your time and effort in filling-out this form. Your honest and objective evaluation will greatly contribute to our effort in helping your organization become better and be more effective. Please return accomplished form to your organization. The rating generated through this survey will be used for this Awards. year’s Magis Note: Interpretation of Rating: This evaluation system uses multiple perspectives in assessing the efficacy of student organizations on campus. The following are the Level five components comprising this system: 5 (95% - 100%) - Exemplary A. Organization Officers The organization performs tasks/ meets conditions reflecting B. Organization Members highest level of performance; very consistent, commendable, C. CSG/ College Councils and effective. D. Moderator E. RRC 4 (90% - 94%) - Advanced The organization performs tasks/ meets conditions reflecting Student organizations are evaluated based on three areas: mastery of performance with minimal supervision required. 1. Organizational Development (30%) 2. Student Welfare (30%) 3 (75% - 89%) - Improved 3. Involvement in the Community (40%) The organization performs tasks/ meets conditions reflecting development towards mastery of performance with occasional The partial rating for each area is derived by dividing the raw score supervision required. earned by the organization and the possible perfect score. The quotient is multiplied by 100 in order to get the percentage. The 2 (61% - 74%) - Basic product is further multiplied by the weight assigned for the particular The organization performs tasks/ meets conditions reflecting area. To get the final rating, the partial ratings generated for each beginning level of performance; tasks/ conditions not met area are being added. satisfactorily most of the time; demonstrates understanding of --- the tasks/ conditions involved. This evaluation system is developed by the Review and Recognition 1 (60% and below) - Deficient Committee (RRC) AY 2008-2009 and revised by the same The organization is not able to satisfactorily meet the conditions required. committee, AY 2012-2013. Use or adaptation of this tool is not allowed unless permission is granted by SACDEV-OSA.
--- Evaluation ends here. --- Thank you very much for your time and effort in filling-out this form. Your honest and objective evaluation will greatly contribute to our effort in helping your organization become better and be more effective. Please return accomplished form to your organization. The rating generated through this survey will be used for this year’s Magis Awards. Note: This evaluation system uses multiple perspectives in assessing the efficacy of student organizations on campus. The following are the five components comprising this system: A. Organization Officers B. Organization Members C. CSG/ College Councils D. Moderator E. RRC Student organizations are evaluated based on three areas: 1. Organizational Development (30%) 2. Student Welfare (30%) 3. Involvement in the Community (40%) The partial rating for each area is derived by dividing the raw score earned by the organization and the possible perfect score. The quotient is multiplied by 100 in order to get the percentage. The product is further multiplied by the weight assigned for the particular area. To get the final rating, the partial ratings generated for each area are being added. --- This evaluation system is developed by the Review and Recognition Committee (RRC) AY 2008-2009 and revised by the same committee, AY 2012-2013. Use or adaptation of this tool is not allowed unless permission is granted by SACDEV-OSA. Interpretation of Rating: Level 5 (95% - 100%) - Exemplary The organization performs tasks/ meets conditions reflecting highest level of performance; very consistent, commendable, and effective. 4 (90% - 94%) - Advanced The organization performs tasks/ meets conditions reflecting mastery of performance with minimal supervision required. 3 (75% - 89%) - Improved The organization performs tasks/ meets conditions reflecting development towards mastery of performance with occasional supervision required. 2 (61% - 74%) - Basic The organization performs tasks/ meets conditions reflecting beginning level of performance; tasks/ conditions not met satisfactorily most of the time; demonstrates understanding of the tasks/ conditions involved. 1 (60% and below) - Deficient The organization is not able to satisfactorily meet the conditions required.
Form-4_Moderator_2017.docx