Grade 09 3.57 [-0.91, 8.05] 0.51 3379 8546 Grade 10 3.23 [-0.46, 6.91] 0.12 1997 6206 Grade 11 1.41 [-2.26, 5.08] 0.09 1610 5161 Grade 12 2.65 [-4.11, 9.40] 0.45 2461 8241 *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. The following models did not converge and are therefore not reported: ELL. Note: Impacts of Implementation Award on Graduation, Year of Intervention by Strategy Odds N N Group 95% CI p-value Ratio (Treatment) (Comparison) Adult Advocates 1.40 [0.8, 2.45] 0.24 902 4,483 Alternative 0.81 [0.29, 2.28] 0.70 470 3,011 Pathways Credit Recovery 0.91 [0.70, 1.2] 0.52 1,516 6,286 There were too few students (average of 10 students per strategy) to conduct valid analyses for the Note: following strategies: Expanded Time, School Climate, Service Learning. Impacts of Implementation Award on Graduation, Year after Intervention by Strategy Odds N N Group 95% CI p-value Ratio (Treatment) (Comparison) Adult Advocates 0.99 [0.78, 1.26] 0.95 1,342 7,392 Alternative 1.11 [0.44, 2.81] 0.83 736 5,735 Pathways Credit Recovery 1.15 [0.89, 1.47] 0.29 2,497 10,118 There were too few students (average of 10 students per strategy) to conduct valid analyses for the Note: following strategies: Expanded Time, School Climate, Service Learning. Impacts of Implementation Award on Graduation, Two Years After Intervention by Strategy Odds N N Group 95% CI p-value Ratio (Treatment) (Comparison) Adult Advocates 0.61 [0.42, 0.89] 0.01** 767 9,724
Grade 09 3.57 [-0.91, 8.05] 0.51 3379 8546 Grade 10 3.23 [-0.46, 6.91] 0.12 1997 6206 Grade 11 1.41 [-2.26, 5.08] 0.09 1610 5161 Grade 12 2.65 [-4.11, 9.40] 0.45 2461 8241 *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Note: The following models did not converge and are therefore not reported: ELL. Impacts of Implementation Award on Graduation, Year of Intervention by Strategy Group Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value N (Treatment) N (Comparison) Adult Advocates 1.40 [0.8, 2.45] 0.24 902 4,483 Alternative Pathways 0.81 [0.29, 2.28] 0.70 470 3,011 Credit Recovery 0.91 [0.70, 1.2] 0.52 1,516 6,286 Note: There were too few students (average of 10 students per strategy) to conduct valid analyses for the following strategies: Expanded Time, School Climate, Service Learning. Impacts of Implementation Award on Graduation, Year after Intervention by Strategy Group Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value N (Treatment) N (Comparison) Adult Advocates 0.99 [0.78, 1.26] 0.95 1,342 7,392 Alternative Pathways 1.11 [0.44, 2.81] 0.83 736 5,735 Credit Recovery 1.15 [0.89, 1.47] 0.29 2,497 10,118 Note: There were too few students (average of 10 students per strategy) to conduct valid analyses for the following strategies: Expanded Time, School Climate, Service Learning. Impacts of Implementation Award on Graduation, Two Years After Intervention by Strategy Group Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value N (Treatment) N (Comparison) Adult Advocates 0.61 [0.42, 0.89] 0.01** 767 9,724
FinalEvaluation.docx