• are developed to address the • include teacher- and needs of diverse learners questions that lead to • are appropriately rigorous. deeper understanding • identify structured or scaffolded learning pathways • develop sophisticated critical and creative thinking • help to prepare students to undertake summative assessment. EVALUATING SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTS Summative Assessments Using Sharing Capable Exemplary The summative assessment The summative assessment task(s): task(s): • relates to the statement of • thoughtfully connects with the inquiry statement of inquiry • offers students a meaningful • allows open-ended and multiple opportunity to demonstrate what ways for students to communicate they understand (know and can their understanding do) • thoroughly explains what • addresses MYP subject-group students will do to demonstrate objectives understanding • can be differentiated to meet • uses relevant MYP subject-group individual student needs. criteria to judge student achievement • represents an appropriate degree of challenge • balances manageability with authenticity • takes into account students with inclusive assessment arrangements. EVALUATING ATL Approaches to learning (ATL)
• are developed to address the needs of diverse learners • are appropriately rigorous. • include teacher- and questions that lead to deeper understanding • identify structured or scaffolded learning pathways • develop sophisticated critical and creative thinking • help to prepare students to undertake summative assessment. EVALUATING SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTS Summative Assessments Using Capable Sharing Exemplary The summative assessment task(s): • relates to the statement of inquiry • offers students a meaningful opportunity to demonstrate what they understand (know and can do) • addresses MYP subject-group objectives • can be differentiated to meet individual student needs. The summative assessment task(s): • thoughtfully connects with the statement of inquiry • allows open-ended and multiple ways for students to communicate their understanding • thoroughly explains what students will do to demonstrate understanding • uses relevant MYP subject-group criteria to judge student achievement • represents an appropriate degree of challenge • balances manageability with authenticity • takes into account students with inclusive assessment arrangements. EVALUATING ATL Approaches to learning (ATL)
Evaluating%20MYP%20Rubrics%20in%20WORD.docx