within current areas e.g. indicators will be based on criteria other sexually transmitted set out in a separate criteria infections. document (available ). Some comments felt that PHD is largely consistent with other there is inconsistency tools and where it this will be isn’t between PHD and other PHE explained. products e.g. Public Health Outcomes Framework includes indicators for excess weight in children, whilst the PHD includes indicators on obese children. Comments on the suitability The rationale for indicators is set out of some indicators that make in a separate document (available ). up the summary rank As a result of specific feedback on indicator. some indicators, the methodology for calculating the summary ranks has been revisited and summary ranks will be revised in July 2018. Lack of clarity within the tool The rationale for indicators is set out e.g. around the inclusion of in a separate document (available ). service areas or indicators, or The metadata for indicators is set out definition of certain in separate document (available ) indicators. Data Some local authorities were Any differences between locally held unable to match data in the data and data in the PHD have been tool. resolved. The indicator metadata has been reviewed to ensure it contains sufficient information to allow users to replicate the calculations. Methodology Requests were received for The methodology is documented in information on how the the methodology document summary rank indicators (available ) have been calculated. Comments on the The methodology is documented in appropriateness of giving the methodology document equal weight to all (available ) component indicators and All indicators will be transformed and suggestions that all indicators summary ranks will be updated July should be transformed 2018. Presentation Some users queried why the Methodology is documented in the summary rank is split into methodology document (available ). four categories, while component indicators themselves are split into three. Difficulty in interpreting Changes have been made to the horizontal bar charts due to scaling of the horizontal bar charts to scaling and labelling. make them easier to interpret.
within current areas e.g. other sexually transmitted infections. indicators will be based on criteria set out in a separate criteria document (available ). Some comments felt that there is inconsistency between PHD and other PHE products e.g. Public Health Outcomes Framework includes indicators for excess weight in children, whilst the PHD includes indicators on obese children. PHD is largely consistent with other tools and where it isn’t this will be explained. Comments on the suitability of some indicators that make up the summary rank indicator. The rationale for indicators is set out in a separate document (available ). As a result of specific feedback on some indicators, the methodology for calculating the summary ranks has been revisited and summary ranks will be revised in July 2018. Lack of clarity within the tool e.g. around the inclusion of service areas or indicators, or definition of certain indicators. The rationale for indicators is set out in a separate document (available ). The metadata for indicators is set out in separate document (available ) Data Some local authorities were unable to match data in the tool. Any differences between locally held data and data in the PHD have been resolved. The indicator metadata has been reviewed to ensure it contains sufficient information to allow users to replicate the calculations. Methodology Requests were received for information on how the summary rank indicators have been calculated. The methodology is documented in the methodology document (available ) Comments on the appropriateness of giving equal weight to all component indicators and suggestions that all indicators should be transformed The methodology is documented in the methodology document (available ) All indicators will be transformed and summary ranks will be updated July 2018. Presentation Some users queried why the summary rank is split into four categories, while component indicators themselves are split into three. Methodology is documented in the methodology document (available ). Difficulty in interpreting horizontal bar charts due to scaling and labelling. Changes have been made to the scaling of the horizontal bar charts to make them easier to interpret.
Feedback%20summary_May%202018.docx