(d) 64 Nollamara Avenue, Nollamara The appellant claimed that he was entitled to be paid for the slab finish and 25% brickwork. When it was put to the appellant that although the slabs had been completed, the brickwork at the property had not yet commenced, he said the brickwork was on its way and he had taken photographs on 6 November 2014 that shows the 'brickies' on the site and bricks on all the slabs. (e) 71 Mirrabooka Avenue, Westminster The appellant claimed that the project had reached lock up stage at the time of the termination of his employment. It was put to the appellant that the build was well short of lock up, that rendering had just started, no ceilings were installed and no glazing (windows) had been installed. The appellant responded by claiming that photographs he had taken on 6 November 2014 proved his claim. (f) 77 Curlington Crescent, Balga The appellant stated that the photographs he took on 6 November 2014 show that this project was at lock up. (g) 207 Ravenswood Drive, Westminster When it was put to the appellant that at the date of termination of his employment this project was 8% complete, the appellant said that was impossible as the brickwork was underway so that would make the project 25% complete. (h) 322A Main Street, Balcatta He denied that this project was 5% complete at the time of the termination of his employment and said the site works, ground slab, first floor brickwork, suspended slabs and second floor brickwork was complete. When re-examined, he said that 95% of the brickwork on this site was finished. When asked about the grounds for termination of employment in cross-examination, the appellant denied that he had failed to attend at the sites and failed to manage the construction of the projects. He also denied that he had breached occupational health and safety laws by failing to wear correct safety gear, failing to adequately inspect electrical tools and leads on the site in use by the subcontractors and failing to erect safety signs at the sites. He said that he had warned Mr Quoc Hung Du (Paul) about this many times and explained he told Paul to
(d) 64 Nollamara Avenue, Nollamara The appellant claimed that he was entitled to be paid for the slab finish and 25% brickwork. When it was put to the appellant that although the slabs had been completed, the brickwork at the property had not yet commenced, he said the brickwork was on its way and he had taken photographs on 6 November 2014 that shows the 'brickies' on the site and bricks on all the slabs. (e) 71 Mirrabooka Avenue, Westminster The appellant claimed that the project had reached lock up stage at the time of the termination of his employment. It was put to the appellant that the build was well short of lock up, that rendering had just started, no ceilings were installed and no glazing (windows) had been installed. The appellant responded by claiming that photographs he had taken on 6 November 2014 proved his claim. (f) 77 Curlington Crescent, Balga The appellant stated that the photographs he took on 6 November 2014 show that this project was at lock up. (g) 207 Ravenswood Drive, Westminster When it was put to the appellant that at the date of termination of his employment this project was 8% complete, the appellant said that was impossible as the brickwork was underway so that would make the project 25% complete. (h) 322A Main Street, Balcatta He denied that this project was 5% complete at the time of the termination of his employment and said the site works, ground slab, first floor brickwork, suspended slabs and second floor brickwork was complete. When re-examined, he said that 95% of the brickwork on this site was finished. When asked about the grounds for termination of employment in cross-examination, the appellant denied that he had failed to attend at the sites and failed to manage the construction of the projects. He also denied that he had breached occupational health and safety laws by failing to wear correct safety gear, failing to adequately inspect electrical tools and leads on the site in use by the subcontractors and failing to erect safety signs at the sites. He said that he had warned Mr Quoc Hung Du (Paul) about this many times and explained he told Paul to
FBA-9-2015-201501118.DOCX