Not at all satisfied 7 2 9 7% <1% 2% Subtotal (responders) 94 286 380 Non respondent 28 131 159 Total 122 417 539 Response rate % 77% 69% 71% Most device loan users who provided feedback, and who were borrowing AT in order to make a purchase decision, went on to decide the AT met their needs. As the table below demonstrates, these were 224 of 348 responders (64%). Table: Device Loan Access Performance Measures—Totals and Combined Loan Loan Performance % Combined Participants Participants Both Measure Responders UCP ES AT meets needs 42 182 224 64% AT meet won’t needs 10 78 88 25% No decision 13 23 36 10% Subtotal (responders) 65 283 348 Non respondent 28 74 102
Not at all satisfied 7 2 9 7% <1% 2% Subtotal (responders) 94 286 380 Non respondent 28 131 159 Total 122 417 539 Response rate % 77% 69% 71% Most device loan users who provided feedback, and who were borrowing AT in order to make a purchase decision, went on to decide the AT met their needs. As the table below demonstrates, these were 224 of 348 responders (64%). Table: Device Loan Access Performance Measures—Totals and Combined Performance Measure Loan Participants UCP Loan Participants ES Both % Combined Responders AT meets needs 42 182 224 64% AT won’t meet needs 10 78 88 25% No decision 13 23 36 10% Subtotal (responders) 65 283 348 Non respondent 28 74 102
Final%20FFY2015%20Annual%20Report%20for%20AT%20Advisory%20Council%2004_06_16.docx