Unacceptable Minimally Done Comprehensive Score 0 1 2 1 Plan includes evidence that a team-based Plan not developed Evidence of team Evidence of team process was used. with a team or involvement in involvement in collection of evidence is not collection of information and selection of presented. information, all interventions used. however not for selection of interventions to be used (team participation evidenced by participant signatures and limited evidence of team involvement). 2 Plan identifies and defines functionally No functionally Functionally Plan identifies and defines equivalent replacement behaviors or equivalent equivalent all functionally equivalent alternative behaviors for all targeted replacement replacement replacement behaviors or challenging behaviors. behaviors or behaviors or alternative behaviors for all alternative behaviors alternative targeted challenging are identified and behaviors are not behaviors. defined. identified or defined for all challenging behaviors. 3 Plan identifies the method and timeline No plan for team Plan for team Plan identifies the method for team review of data and progress. review is identified. review of data and timeline for team and progress is review of data and progress identified but on an ongoing basis (at least there is no quarterly). timeline or it is more six months before team review. 4 The plan describes methods for providing No intervention in Interventions do Interventions for choice and opportunities for choice and social the plan addresses not adequately social interaction are clearly interaction. these areas. address addressed. opportunities for choice or social interaction. 5 The plan describes setting event and No setting event or Setting event Setting event and antecedent antecedent intervention based on the antecedent and/or interventions are clearly targeted challenging behaviors. interventions are antecedent described and based on the included. interventions are targeted challenging included but are behaviors. not clearly described or based on the targeted challenging behaviors. 6 Positive consequence interventions Positive Positive Each positive intervention include an explanation of how they relate interventions do not interventions do specifically states how it to the perceived function stated in the address the not relate or related to the perceived hypothesis. perceived function relate incorrectly function in the hypothesis in the hypothesis to the perceived statement. statements. function in the
Unacceptable 0 Minimally Done 1 Comprehensive 2 Score 1 Plan includes evidence that a team-based process was used. Plan not developed with a team or evidence is not presented. Evidence of team involvement in collection of information, however not for selection of interventions to be used (team participation evidenced by participant signatures and limited evidence of team involvement). Evidence of team involvement in collection of information and selection of all interventions used. 2 Plan identifies and defines functionally equivalent replacement behaviors or alternative behaviors for all targeted challenging behaviors. No functionally equivalent replacement behaviors or alternative behaviors are identified and defined. Functionally equivalent replacement behaviors or alternative behaviors are not identified or defined for all challenging behaviors. Plan identifies and defines all functionally equivalent replacement behaviors or alternative behaviors for all targeted challenging behaviors. 3 Plan identifies the method and timeline for team review of data and progress. No plan for team review is identified. Plan for team review of data and progress is identified but there is no timeline or it is more six months before team review. Plan identifies the method and timeline for team review of data and progress on an ongoing basis (at least quarterly). 4 The plan describes methods for providing opportunities for choice and social interaction. No intervention in the plan addresses these areas. Interventions do not adequately address opportunities for choice or social interaction. Interventions for choice and social interaction are clearly addressed. 5 The plan describes setting event and antecedent intervention based on the targeted challenging behaviors. No setting event or antecedent interventions are included. Setting event and/or antecedent interventions are included but are not clearly described or based on the targeted challenging behaviors. Setting event and antecedent interventions are clearly described and based on the targeted challenging behaviors. 6 Positive consequence interventions include an explanation of how they relate to the perceived function stated in the hypothesis. Positive interventions do not address the perceived function in the hypothesis statements. Positive interventions do not relate or relate incorrectly to the perceived function in the Each positive intervention specifically states how it related to the perceived function in the hypothesis statement.
expedited__application_pbs_endorsement-_revised_12-2-16.docx