Assessment Peer Review Report: Subject Design Practice Form 1 of 4 – General comments Dimensions of subject design: Quantity and quality of evidence Alignment with CSU Assessment Policy Subject No apparent Some Many – examples examples examples #All subject learning outcomes are covered by the assessments in the subject #All assessment tasks are clearly linked to at least Effectiveness Effective Very one subject learning outcome in each assessment effective not clear task rationale, criteria and standards enter other chosen review items Alignment with CSU Assessment Policy Task No apparent Some Many – examples examples examples #Rationale is aligned to subject learning outcomes #Marking criteria are aligned to subject learning outcomes Effectiveness Effective Very #Pass level grade meets the standard required in not clear effective the learning outcomes enter other chosen review items Alignment with CSU Learning & Teaching Priorities No apparent Some Many examples examples examples 3.1 chosen review items Effectiveness Effective Very not clear effective Assessment Strategies No apparent Some Many examples examples examples 4.1 enter chosen review items Effectiveness Effective Very not clear effective Formative Assessment and Feedback Strategies No apparent Some Many examples examples examples 5.1 enter chosen review items Effectiveness Effective Very effective not clear Feedback on Assessment No apparent Some Many examples examples examples 6.1 chosen review items
Assessment Peer Review Report: Subject Design Practice – Form 1 of 4 General comments Dimensions of subject design: Quantity and quality of evidence Alignment with CSU Assessment Policy – Subject #All subject learning outcomes are covered by the assessments in the subject #All assessment tasks are clearly linked to at least one subject learning outcome in each assessment task rationale, criteria and standards enter other chosen review items No apparent examples Some examples Many examples Effectiveness not clear Effective Very effective Alignment with CSU Assessment Policy – Task #Rationale is aligned to subject learning outcomes #Marking criteria are aligned to subject learning outcomes #Pass level grade meets the standard required in the learning outcomes enter other chosen review items No apparent examples Some examples Many examples Effectiveness not clear Effective Very effective Alignment with CSU Learning & Teaching Priorities 3.1 chosen review items No apparent examples Some examples Many examples Effectiveness not clear Effective Very effective Assessment Strategies 4.1 enter chosen review items No apparent examples Some examples Many examples Effectiveness not clear Effective Very effective Formative Assessment and Feedback Strategies 5.1 enter chosen review items No apparent examples Some examples Many examples Effectiveness not clear Effective Very effective Feedback on Assessment 6.1 chosen review items No apparent examples Some examples Many examples
Peer-Review-Subject-Form1-Assessment.docx