All evaluators receive training and support in IC 20-28-11.5-5(b) Description ongoing evaluator training evaluation skills 511 IAC 10-6-3 Feedback and Remediation Plans Statutory / Regulatory Reference Page Requirement Examples of Relevant Information Authority Number(s) All evaluated employees receive completed IC 20-28-11.5-6(a) System for delivering summative evaluation results to employees evaluation and documented feedback within seven business days from the completion of the evaluation. Remediation plans assigned to teachers rated IC 20-28-11.5-6(b) Remediation plan creation and timeframe as ineffective or improvement necessary Process for linking evaluation results with professional development Remediation plans include the use of IC 20-28-11.5-6(b) Description of how employee license renewal credits and/or Professional employee’s license renewal credits Growth Points will be incorporated into remediation Means by which teachers rated as ineffective IC 20-28-11.5-6(c) Process for teachers rated as ineffective to request conference with can request a private conference with the superintendent superintendent Instruction Delivered by Teachers Rated Ineffective Statutory / Regulatory Reference Page Requirement Examples of Relevant Information Authority Number(s) The procedures established for avoiding IC 20-28-11.5-7(c) Process for ensuring students do not receive instruction from ineffective situations in which a student would be teachers two years in a row instructed for two consecutive years by two consecutive teachers rated as ineffective The procedures established to communicate to IC 20-28-11.5-7(d) Description of how parents will be informed of the situation parents when student assignment to consecutive teachers rated as ineffective is unavoidable Teacher Appreciation Grant Policy Statutory / Regulatory Reference Page Requirement Examples of Relevant Information Authority Number(s) The amount of a stipend awarded to a teacher IC 20-43-10-3.5 Process and calculation for differentiating award amounts rated as Highly Effective must be at least 25% greater than the amount of a stipend awarded to a teacher rated as Effective The TAG policy may differentiate between IC 20-43-10-3.5 Indication of whether amounts will be differentiated between schools within school buildings the corporation
All evaluators receive training and support in evaluation skills IC 20-28-11.5-5(b) 511 IAC 10-6-3 Description ongoing evaluator training Feedback and Remediation Plans Requirement Statutory / Regulatory Authority Examples of Relevant Information Reference Page Number(s) All evaluated employees receive completed evaluation and documented feedback within seven business days from the completion of the evaluation. IC 20-28-11.5-6(a) System for delivering summative evaluation results to employees Remediation plans assigned to teachers rated as ineffective or improvement necessary IC 20-28-11.5-6(b) Remediation plan creation and timeframe Process for linking evaluation results with professional development Remediation plans include the use of employee’s license renewal credits IC 20-28-11.5-6(b) Description of how employee license renewal credits and/or Professional Growth Points will be incorporated into remediation Means by which teachers rated as ineffective can request a private conference with the superintendent IC 20-28-11.5-6(c) Process for teachers rated as ineffective to request conference with superintendent Instruction Delivered by Teachers Rated Ineffective Requirement Statutory / Regulatory Authority Examples of Relevant Information Reference Page Number(s) The procedures established for avoiding situations in which a student would be instructed for two consecutive years by two consecutive teachers rated as ineffective IC 20-28-11.5-7(c) Process for ensuring students do not receive instruction from ineffective teachers two years in a row The procedures established to communicate to parents when student assignment to consecutive teachers rated as ineffective is unavoidable IC 20-28-11.5-7(d) Description of how parents will be informed of the situation Teacher Appreciation Grant Policy Requirement Statutory / Regulatory Authority Examples of Relevant Information Reference Page Number(s) The amount of a stipend awarded to a teacher rated as Highly Effective must be at least 25% greater than the amount of a stipend awarded to a teacher rated as Effective IC 20-43-10-3.5 Process and calculation for differentiating award amounts The TAG policy may differentiate between school buildings IC 20-43-10-3.5 Indication of whether amounts will be differentiated between schools within the corporation
evaluation-plan-submission-coversheet-2017-2018.docx