[39] Accordingly I am prepared to vary of the order of 22 February 2013 paragraph “2” as follows: is ordered that Namfisa may deliver an application for leave to oppose as required by ‘It Rule 6(4)(b) of the Rules of High Court, within 14 days of the date of variation of the order of 22 February 2013.’ [40] In addition I make the following further orders: The application for the variation of the order of 22 February 2013 succeeds to the following extent: is ordered that Namfisa may deliver an application for leave to oppose as “It required by Rule 6(4)(b) of the Rules of High Court, within 14 days of the date of variation of the order of 22 February 2013.’’ Namfisa is to pay the costs in the Rule 44 application, limited to the applicant’s actual disbursements, reasonably incurred. applicant’s The Rule 30 applications, filed by Namfisa, on 15 March 2013 and 14 June 2013, are dismissed. Namfisa is ordered to pay the actual disbursements, reasonably applicant’s incurred, relating to both the said Rule 30 applications. The matter is postponed to 15 October 2013 at 15h30 for a status hearing. ---------------------------------- H GEIER Judge
[39] Accordingly I am prepared to vary paragraph “2” of the order of 22 February 2013 as follows: ‘It is ordered that Namfisa may deliver an application for leave to oppose as required by Rule 6(4)(b) of the Rules of High Court, within 14 days of the date of variation of the order of 22 February 2013.’ [40] In addition I make the following further orders: The application for the variation of the order of 22 February 2013 succeeds to the following extent: “It is ordered that Namfisa may deliver an application for leave to oppose as required by Rule 6(4)(b) of the Rules of High Court, within 14 days of the date of variation of the order of 22 February 2013.’’ Namfisa is to pay the applicant’s costs in the Rule 44 application, limited to the applicant’s actual disbursements, reasonably incurred. The Rule 30 applications, filed by Namfisa, on 15 March 2013 and 14 June 2013, are dismissed. Namfisa is ordered to pay the applicant’s actual disbursements, reasonably incurred, relating to both the said Rule 30 applications. The matter is postponed to 15 October 2013 at 15h30 for a status hearing. ---------------------------------- H GEIER Judge
Ex%20Parte%20Hendrik%20Christian%20ta%20Hope%20Financial%20Services%20(A%2035-2013)%20[2016]%20NAHCMD%20111%20(18%20September%202015).docx