Criteria 12.2.2: Ongoing monitoring (e.g. up to five years after relocation) of commitments to relocated communities is in place. Standard 12.3: Conservation Criteria 12.3.1: Biological rationale for impacts on the evacuated area relocation needs to be clearly stated and are identified, managed and communicated to local communities. monitored. Criteria 12.3.2: Restoration plans for the evacuated area are developed, implemented and monitored (e.g. re-use by tigers and prey). Standard 12.4: Involvement and Criteria 12.4.1: The site’s local engagement of Indigenous governance structures and mechanisms Peoples and local communities recognise the legitimate rights of in governance. Indigenous Peoples and local communities Criteria 12.4.2: Community consultation and involvement in the management of the conservation area/buffer zone is appropriate, clearly planned, implemented, monitored, assessed and documented (see also Standard 4.2). Standard 12.5: Criteria 12.5.1: If in place, government livelihood policy on benefit sharing /alternative mechanisms are in place and livelihoods is implemented, monitored monitored. and assessed by the conservation area. Criteria 12.5.2: Approaches undertaken by the conservation / protected area for sharing benefits/alternative livelihoods with communities (e.g. tourism revenue generated and shared) are clearly planned, implemented, monitored, assessed, adapted and documented (see also Standard 4.2).
Criteria 12.2.2: Ongoing monitoring (e.g. up to five years after relocation) of commitments to relocated communities is in place. Standard 12.3: Conservation impacts on the evacuated area are identified, managed and monitored. Criteria 12.3.1: Biological rationale for relocation needs to be clearly stated and communicated to local communities. Criteria 12.3.2: Restoration plans for the evacuated area are developed, implemented and monitored (e.g. re-use by tigers and prey). Standard 12.4: Involvement and engagement of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in governance. Criteria 12.4.1: The site’s local governance structures and mechanisms recognise the legitimate rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities Criteria 12.4.2: Community consultation and involvement in the management of the conservation area/buffer zone is appropriate, clearly planned, implemented, monitored, assessed and documented (see also Standard 4.2). Standard 12.5: livelihood mechanisms are in place and monitored. Criteria 12.5.1: If in place, government policy on benefit sharing /alternative livelihoods is implemented, monitored and assessed by the conservation area. Criteria 12.5.2: Approaches undertaken by the conservation / protected area for sharing benefits/alternative livelihoods with communities (e.g. tourism revenue generated and shared) are clearly planned, implemented, monitored, assessed, adapted and documented (see also Standard 4.2).
f2-cats-dossier-assessment-form%20(1).docx