Good In women 17 84% [79, 87] 79% [70, 85] In men 13 89% [84, 93] 71% [61, 80] Pharm stress SPECT 8 86% [74, 93] 83% [68, 91] Tech 99m SPECT 10 85% [77, 90] 78% [63, 89] vs ICA ≥50% DS Lapado et al. () Perfusion SPECT NR 30 85% [81, 88] 69% [61, 78] - - - Poor vs ICA ≥50%–75% DS de Jong et al. () Stress perfusion SPECT 52% 13 (all) 83% [73, 89] 77% [64, 86] - - - Moderate In suspected CAD 4 83% [70, 91] 79% [66, 87] vs ICA ≥50% DS 8 81% [72, 87] 81% [72, 87] vs ICA ≥70% DS 6 85% [76, 91] 66% [54, 77] Jaarsma et al. () Stress perfusion SPECT 70% 105 88% [88, 89] 61% [59, 62] 45 Artery-based 69% [68, 70] 79% [78, 80] Moderate In suspected CAD 56 85% [84, 86] 69% [67, 71] vs ICA ≥50% DS 88 87% [86, 87] 69% [67, 71] vs ICA ≥70% DS 17 93% [92, 94] 43% [41, 46] Dolor et al. () Stress SPECT 42% - - - Good Suspected CAD–women 14 81% [76, 86] 78% [69, 84] Known or suspected 30 82% [77, 87] 81% [74, 86] vs ICA ≥50%–75% DS Mc Ardle et al. () Perfusion SPECT 50% 8 85% [82, 87] 85% [82, 87] - - - Moderate vs ICA ≥50%–75% DS Al Moudi et al. () Perfusion SPECT NR 15 82% [76, 88] 76% [70, 82] Poor vs ICA ≥50% DS
Good In women In men Pharm stress SPECT Tech 99m SPECT vs ICA ≥50% DS 17 13 8 10 84% [79, 87] 89% [84, 93] 86% [74, 93] 85% [77, 90] 79% [70, 85] 71% [61, 80] 83% [68, 91] 78% [63, 89] Lapado et al. () Poor Perfusion SPECT vs ICA ≥50%–75% DS NR 30 85% [81, 88] 69% [61, 78] - - - de Jong et al. () Moderate Stress perfusion SPECT In suspected CAD vs ICA ≥50% DS vs ICA ≥70% DS 52% 13 (all) 4 8 6 83% [73, 89] 83% [70, 91] 81% [72, 87] 85% [76, 91] 77% [64, 86] 79% [66, 87] 81% [72, 87] 66% [54, 77] - - - Jaarsma et al. () Moderate Stress perfusion SPECT In suspected CAD vs ICA ≥50% DS vs ICA ≥70% DS 70% 105 56 88 17 88% [88, 89] 85% [84, 86] 87% [86, 87] 93% [92, 94] 61% [59, 62] 69% [67, 71] 69% [67, 71] 43% [41, 46] 45 Artery-based 69% [68, 70] 79% [78, 80] Dolor et al. () Good Stress SPECT Suspected CAD–women Known or suspected vs ICA ≥50%–75% DS 42% 14 30 81% [76, 86] 82% [77, 87] 78% [69, 84] 81% [74, 86] - - - Mc Ardle et al. () Moderate Perfusion SPECT vs ICA ≥50%–75% DS 50% 8 85% [82, 87] 85% [82, 87] - - - Al Moudi et al. () Poor Perfusion SPECT vs ICA ≥50% DS NR 15 82% [76, 88] 76% [70, 82]
1237-AssessmentReport-Final.docx