participate in the RPS implementation program subject to purposes as the the same terms and utilities that are conditions applicable fully regulated by to electrical the CPUC corporations. (D.0511025, pp. 1213). Further, Specifically, the Joint the Commission Utilities claim that has no this requires all retail responsibility for sellers to file the price solicitation reasonableness of documentation (as ESP procurement, required by and to regulatory 399.13(a)(5) and cost over ESP rates quantification tables. (D.1101026, pp. 2223). They note that the CPUC doesn't Therefore, approve solicitation we will not documentation, but require CCAs and assert that this ESPs to file the documentation still solicitation and needs to be filed. cost quantification tables, but they are required to include in their RPS procurement plans the remaining requirements of Section 399.13(a)(5). LSA at 3 PG&E and LSA comments that This issue SDG&E uncertainty should be
participate in the RPS program subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to electrical corporations. Specifically, the Joint Utilities claim that this requires all retail sellers to file solicitation documentation (as required by 399.13(a)(5) and cost quantification tables. They note that the CPUC doesn't approve solicitation documentation, but assert that this documentation still needs to be filed. implementation purposes as the utilities that are fully regulated by the CPUC (D.0511025, pp. 1213). Further, the Commission has no responsibility for the price reasonableness of ESP procurement, and to regulatory over ESP rates (D.1101026, pp. 2223). Therefore, we will not require CCAs and ESPs to file the solicitation and cost quantification tables, but they are required to include in their RPS procurement plans the remaining requirements of Section 399.13(a)(5). LSA at 3 PG&E and SDG&E LSA comments that uncertainty This issue should be
171552899.docx