Compares new findings to past trends, as appropriate. Supporting documentation (rubrics, surveys, more complete reports*, etc.) are included in the document repository. *Reports must be free of student identifiable information. Use of Results Exhibits an Reflects with sufficient Not clearly related to understanding of the depth on what was assessment results. Implications of learned during the to offer excuses for assessment findings. assessment cycle. results rather than Identifies an area that At least one action plan thoughtful interpretation needs to be monitored, in place. or "next steps" for remediated, or program improvement. enhanced and defines No action plans or too logical "next steps". many to manage. Possibly identifies an Too general; lacking area of the assessment details (e.g. time frame, process that responsible party). improvement. Contains completion dates. Identifies a responsible person/group. Number of action plans are manageable Rubric adapted from the following institutions: Indiana University South Bend, Texas A & M University,
Compares new findings to past trends, as appropriate. Supporting documentation (rubrics, surveys, more complete reports*, etc.) are included in the document repository. *Reports must be free of student identifiable information. Use of Results Exhibits an understanding of the Implications of assessment findings. Identifies an area that needs to be monitored, remediated, or enhanced and defines logical "next steps". Possibly identifies an area of the assessment process that improvement. Contains completion dates. Identifies a responsible person/group. Number of action plans are manageable Reflects with sufficient depth on what was learned during the assessment cycle. At least one action plan in place. Not clearly related to assessment results. to offer excuses for results rather than thoughtful interpretation or "next steps" for program improvement. No action plans or too many to manage. Too general; lacking details (e.g. time frame, responsible party). Rubric adapted from the following institutions: Indiana University South Bend, Texas A & M University,
OutcomesandAssessment_InstitutionalEffectivenessPlanningandReportingRubric.docx