The Evaluation Committee compared the arithmetically corrected financial offers to calculate their financial scores: *In case there were arithmetical corrections, one should include an annex describing what these arithmetical corrections were. Tender ID Tenderer name Price in Euro as per Price in Euro Financial financial offer including any Weight arithmetical corrections (if any)* Final Ranking of Administratively and Technically Compliant Tenders as follows: Price in Euro Overall score Tender ID Name of Tenderer Ranking including [(Technical any score x 0.80*) + (Financial arithmetical corrections score x 0.20*) (if any) as per – Tender Document] [For each lot, ] the final ranking of the tenders which were not excluded during the evaluation was as follows, in order of the arithmetically corrected financial offers: Tender ID Tenderer name Financial offer Final ranking [after arithmetical correction] (Euro) 3. Conclusion Pursuant to the above, the Evaluation Committee recommends that this tender is awarded to [name of bidder] for the amount of of VAT, this being the cheapest compliant offer (Price Award)/the most [€………] exclusive economically advantageous offer with the BPQR. (In the case where the financial offer of the recommended tenderer exceeds the estimated budget)
The Evaluation Committee compared the arithmetically corrected financial offers to calculate their financial scores: *In case there were arithmetical corrections, one should include an annex describing what these arithmetical corrections were. Tender ID Tenderer name Price in Euro as per financial offer Price in Euro including any arithmetical corrections (if any)* Financial Weight Final Ranking of Administratively and Technically Compliant Tenders as follows: Tender ID Name of Tenderer Price in Euro including any arithmetical corrections (if any) Overall score [(Technical score x 0.80*) + (Financial score x 0.20*) – as per Tender Document] Ranking [For each lot, ] the final ranking of the tenders which were not excluded during the evaluation was as follows, in order of the arithmetically corrected financial offers: Tender ID Tenderer name Financial offer [after arithmetical correction] (Euro) Final ranking 3. Conclusion Pursuant to the above, the Evaluation Committee recommends that this tender is awarded to [name of bidder] for the amount of [€………] exclusive of VAT, this being the cheapest compliant offer (Price Award)/the most economically advantageous offer with the BPQR. (In the case where the financial offer of the recommended tenderer exceeds the estimated budget)
Evaluation%20Report%20e-Tenders%20including%20BPQR%20Version%201.0%2020180131.docx