Limited report never finalised (11 months Had impact on donors working in PFM (in Government changed. PEFA assessment met a – from field mission to date of draft report) the Budget Support [BS] who agreed No ownership for what perceived need for to use a single calendar for missions on previous government did comprehensive statement of PEFA assessment intended to be used as PFM and use of multi-donor missions. Report took too long to status of PFM systems, platform for government, but got emerge was overtaken although in finalisation – overtaken by events (caused in part by delay in Common information pool: BS taking by events (election and (lack of?) release of getting draft out). Thus, no opportunity to PEFA matrix as PFM matrix. PEFA results timing) final report led to frustration discuss with government before government integrated into PAF of BS amongst DPs changed. New government reluctant to use analysis undertaken under old government. PEFA framework helping to donors Following PEFA around a common instrument assessment, there was PFM reforms started before PEFA assessment However, donors were frustrated by length agreement by DPs to use a – reforms carrying on. PEFA analysis reportedly of time for PEFA report to be finalised and single mission calendar and did not have an input into the new reform lack of information on the process. to co-ordinate PFM missions programme. helped DP-DP co-ordination
Limited – report never finalised (11 months from field mission to date of draft report) PEFA assessment intended to be used as platform for government, but got overtaken by events (caused in part by delay in getting draft out). Thus, no opportunity to discuss with government before government changed. New government reluctant to use analysis undertaken under old government. PFM reforms started before PEFA assessment – reforms carrying on. PEFA analysis reportedly did not have an input into the new reform programme. Had impact on donors working in PFM (in the Budget Support [BS] who agreed to use a single calendar for missions on PFM and use of multi-donor missions. Common information pool: BS taking PEFA matrix as PFM matrix. PEFA results integrated into PAF of BS PEFA framework helping to donors around a common instrument However, donors were frustrated by length of time for PEFA report to be finalised and lack of information on the process. Government changed. No ownership for what previous government did Report took too long to emerge – was overtaken by events (election timing) PEFA assessment met a perceived need for comprehensive statement of status of PFM systems, although in finalisation and (lack of?) release of final report led to frustration amongst DPs Following PEFA assessment, there was agreement by DPs to use a single mission calendar and to co-ordinate PFM missions helped DP-DP co-ordination
PEFAImpactStudyFinalReportVolumeISynthesis.docx