Legislation development/enactment Enforcement (lack of) Established processes to reach national goals Sustainability of the process (succession planning) Taking more advantage of all available Lack of biodiversity mainstreaming international funding Improved technical will and capacity for environment agencies Completing GEF application procedure Limited time NBSAP Steering/Working Committee Mobilization of funding established No political support New NBSAP done! Evidence base Identifying stakeholders How to make the NBSAP work at the ground level Civil society attention Stakeholder participation, cooperation, communication Already have NBSAP, and in the process of (government and academia) revising it Continuity of political will COP Guidelines Agricultural modernization without consideration of Convention itself biodiversity Private sector Mainstreaming across sectors and regions Private sector Incentives for all people NGO sector and biodiversity protection Identification of national targets according to the Aichi service of MOE are cooperating tightly in the Targets process (that was missed earlier) Building capacity Identifying stakeholders Development projects are running very actively in the Strengthening national coordination country and there might be barriers in the process of Mainstreaming biodiversity in some sectors of mainstreaming biodiversity economic and development activities Implementation Updated! CHM Already have NBSAP and in process of Funding updating and revising it Guiding framework to link national to local Direct access of GEF-5 Enabling Act Fund processes Lack of capacity Updating ABS Bill to reflect Aichi Targets; Scattered information/data signing and ratifying Political priority in economic crisis Interest of private sector to contribute Turning commitments into practical actions Integration of other sectors at strategic levels Donor dependency Continued and increased commitment re Local communities’ priorities protected areas network (e.g. SPERRGEBIET Lack of coordination / Namib Escarpment / Coral Triangle / Micronesia Challenge / LMMA) Achieving Agreement of National Policy , Lots of evidence of problems but need agreement on Political Buy-In solutions Developing NBSAP in line with Strategic Plan Reliance on GEF to start NBSAP review process for Biodiversity Integration of biodiversity into other sectors Developed planning process for NBSAP Insufficient resources Developing integrated action plan for Environment given lower priority than other sectors protected areas Government really putting strategy into practice Sharing experiences with other countries at Accessing resources (too many barriers) the workshop Mainstreaming into development agenda
Legislation development/enactment Established processes to reach national goals Taking more advantage of all available international funding Improved technical will and capacity for environment agencies Enforcement (lack of) Sustainability of the process (succession planning) Lack of biodiversity mainstreaming Completing GEF application procedure NBSAP Steering/Working Committee established New NBSAP done! Identifying stakeholders Civil society attention Already have NBSAP, and in the process of revising it COP Guidelines Convention itself Private sector Limited time Mobilization of funding No political support Evidence base How to make the NBSAP work at the ground level Stakeholder participation, cooperation, communication (government and academia) Continuity of political will Agricultural modernization without consideration of biodiversity Mainstreaming across sectors and regions Private sector Incentives for all people NGO sector and biodiversity protection service of MOE are cooperating tightly in the process (that was missed earlier) Identifying stakeholders Strengthening national coordination Mainstreaming biodiversity in some sectors of economic and development activities Updated! Already have NBSAP and in process of updating and revising it Identification of national targets according to the Aichi Targets Building capacity Development projects are running very actively in the country and there might be barriers in the process of mainstreaming biodiversity Implementation CHM Funding Guiding framework to link national to local processes Updating ABS Bill to reflect Aichi Targets; signing and ratifying Interest of private sector to contribute Integration of other sectors at strategic levels Continued and increased commitment re protected areas network (e.g. SPERRGEBIET / Namib Escarpment / Coral Triangle / Micronesia Challenge / LMMA) Direct access of GEF-5 Enabling Act Fund Lack of capacity Scattered information/data Political priority in economic crisis Turning commitments into practical actions Donor dependency Local communities’ priorities Lack of coordination Achieving Agreement of National Policy , Political Buy-In Developing NBSAP in line with Strategic Plan for Biodiversity Developed planning process for NBSAP Developing integrated action plan for protected areas Sharing experiences with other countries at the workshop Mainstreaming into development agenda Lots of evidence of problems but need agreement on solutions Reliance on GEF to start NBSAP review process Integration of biodiversity into other sectors Insufficient resources Environment given lower priority than other sectors Government really putting strategy into practice Accessing resources (too many barriers)
Final%20report%20Brazil%20workshop.docx