c Financing for No specific funding MS agreement on country Funding less than 50% Funding less than 75% Funding more than 75% Full funding of that transboundary allocated from the MS share of contributions in of that expected as of that expected as of that expected as expected as contributions cooperation budgets nor from other place and in-kind support for contributions and by contributions and by contributions and by and by regulation. regular sources. the cooperation organisation regulation. regulation. regulation. / arrangement. Score or [Enter score] Justification/evidence [Enter text here. E.g. reference to financing arrangements, evidence of contributions.] n/a: [Enter score here] Average ‘Financing’ score In case of ‘n/a’ for any questions, they should be omitted from the average calculation. Indicator 6.5.1 score Please complete the following table based on scores calculated for the previous four sections. The indicator 6.5.1 score is the average of each of the section scores. Section Average Score Section 1 Enabling Environment Section 2 Institutions and Participation Section 3 Management Instruments Section 4 Financing Indicator 6.5.1 score = Degree of IWRM implementation (0-100) (Please remember: Questions where the score is 0 (zero) must be included. However, questions that are not applicable must not be included.) Interpretation of the score The score indicates the ‘degree of implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management’, on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 signifying no implementation, and 100 signifying complete implementation. However, the true value of the questionnaire to countries lies within the scores and justification provided for the individual questions, as this helps to identify which actions need to be taken to move towards a greater degree of implementation of IWRM.
c Financing for transboundary cooperation No specific funding allocated from the MS budgets nor from other regular sources. MS agreement on country share of contributions in place and in-kind support for the cooperation organisation / arrangement. Funding less than 50% of that expected as contributions and by regulation. Funding less than 75% of that expected as contributions and by regulation. Funding more than 75% of that expected as contributions and by regulation. Full funding of that expected as contributions and by regulation. Score or n/a: [Enter score] Justification/evidence [Enter text here. E.g. reference to financing arrangements, evidence of contributions.] Average ‘Financing’ score [Enter score here] In case of ‘n/a’ for any questions, they should be omitted from the average calculation. Indicator 6.5.1 score Please complete the following table based on scores calculated for the previous four sections. The indicator 6.5.1 score is the average of each of the section scores. Section Average Score Section 1 Enabling Environment Section 2 Institutions and Participation Section 3 Management Instruments Section 4 Financing Indicator 6.5.1 score = Degree of IWRM implementation (0-100) (Please remember: Questions where the score is 0 (zero) must be included. However, questions that are not applicable must not be included.) Interpretation of the score The score indicates the ‘degree of implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management’, on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 signifying no implementation, and 100 signifying complete implementation. However, the true value of the questionnaire to countries lies within the scores and justification provided for the individual questions, as this helps to identify which actions need to be taken to move towards a greater degree of implementation of IWRM.
ENG_6_5_1_Questionnaire.docx