PROGRAMME 8; HEALTH FACILITIES MANAGEMENT TABLE 77 AND 78 NATIONAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR HEALTH FACILITIES MANGEMENT Indicator Short Purpose/ Source Method of Data Type of New Desired Indicator Title Definition Importance Calculation Limitations Type Cycle Equitable Expenditure Tracks Health Facility Numerator Data quality Quality Annual No Higher Health Facility share on buildings expenditure Maintenance is reliant on in Rands average Maintenance Expenditure capital and on health accurate backlog of Programme on buildings Programme programme equipment costing and service upgrade as % of total from the and assessment platform renovation health provincial equipment of the reflects poor and expenditure equitable BAS condition of condition of construction share health health allocation facilities facilities. In (I.e. some excluding Denominator instances, it conditional might even Total grants) as a be more Expenditure percentage cost-effective by provincial of total to replace DoH provincial than to repair health the facility (equitable expenditure share) Number of Number of Tracks Health Facility No Focus Input Sum Annual No Higher Health Facility Hospitals hospitals progress Maintenance Denominator should be percentages Maintenance funded from with funding with the on hospitals of hospitals Programme Programme the from the revitalisation that have funded revitalisation of hospitals been reflect programme Grant from to improve actually progress with 2003 service funded for the delivery planning or revitalisation of hospitals or both, but not on approved business cases that have not been funded
PROGRAMME 8; HEALTH FACILITIES MANAGEMENT TABLE 77 AND 78 NATIONAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR HEALTH FACILITIES MANGEMENT Indicator Title Short Definition Purpose/ Importance Source Method of Calculation Data Limitations Type of Type Cycle New Desired Indicator Equitable share capital programme as % of total health expenditure Expenditure on buildings and equipment from the provincial equitable share allocation (I.e. excluding conditional grants) as a percentage of total provincial health expenditure Tracks expenditure on health and equipment Health Facility Maintenance Programme BAS Numerator Expenditure on buildings upgrade renovation and construction Denominator Total Expenditure by provincial DoH (equitable share) Data quality is reliant on accurate costing and assessment of the condition of health facilities Quality in Rands Annual No Higher average backlog of service platform reflects poor condition of health facilities. In some instances, it might even be more cost-effective to replace than to repair the facility Health Facility Maintenance Programme Number of Hospitals funded from the revitalisation programme Number of hospitals with funding from the Grant from 2003 Tracks progress with the revitalisation of hospitals to improve service delivery Health Facility Maintenance Programme No Denominator Focus should be on hospitals that have been actually funded for planning or or both, but not on approved business cases that have not been funded Input Sum Annual No Higher percentages of hospitals funded reflect progress with the revitalisation of hospitals Health Facility Maintenance Programme
Final%20master%20Health%20Vote%207-%202011-12-13-14%20APPapproved%20by%20Legislature%20on%2028%20June%202011%20.docx