After rating each component individually and determining a separate rating, the following formula will be used to determine a summative score: teacher’s [(Admin. Evaluation Rating)/3] + [(Deliberate Practice Score)/3] + [(Student Performance Measure)/3] This summative evaluation will be rated using the following scale: Summative Evaluation HE 141-160 E 114-140 NI 56-113 U 0-55 Rating Scale Definitions The district expects its employees to provide competent and professional work that should improve over time. The employee and supervisor should discuss the level of performance that is expected for each dimension in the planning session. In determining the expected performance levels, the requirements of the position and the employee experience are to be considered. Highly Effective* Indicates performance that consistently meets an extremely high quality standard. This service exceeds the typical standard of normal level service and is held in high regard by supervision and colleagues. Specific comments and examples of high quality work must be included in the assessment Effective* Indicates performance that consistently meets a high quality standard. This is professional level service that meets the district expectations and is consistent with the experience level of the employee. Needs Improvement/Developing* Indicates performance that requires additional attention to ensure an acceptable level of proficiency. Further, this performance is not consistently characteristic of the requirements for the position and experience of the employee. If this category is used, there must be written support regarding how performance is to be improved. The rating of Developing may be used for instructional personnel in the first three years of employment who need improvement.
After rating each component individually and determining a separate rating, the following formula will be used to determine a teacher’s summative score: [(Admin. Evaluation Rating)/3] + [(Deliberate Practice Score)/3] + [(Student Performance Measure)/3] This summative evaluation will be rated using the following scale: Summative Evaluation HE 141-160 E 114-140 NI 56-113 U 0-55 Rating Scale Definitions The district expects its employees to provide competent and professional work that should improve over time. The employee and supervisor should discuss the level of performance that is expected for each dimension in the planning session. In determining the expected performance levels, the requirements of the position and the employee experience are to be considered. Highly Effective* Indicates performance that consistently meets an extremely high quality standard. This service exceeds the typical standard of normal level service and is held in high regard by supervision and colleagues. Specific comments and examples of high quality work must be included in the assessment Effective* Indicates performance that consistently meets a high quality standard. This is professional level service that meets the district expectations and is consistent with the experience level of the employee. Needs Improvement/Developing* Indicates performance that requires additional attention to ensure an acceptable level of proficiency. Further, this performance is not consistently characteristic of the requirements for the position and experience of the employee. If this category is used, there must be written support regarding how performance is to be improved. The rating of Developing may be used for instructional personnel in the first three years of employment who need improvement.
FDC6C3F2AB8AAE5A63A2C8BB70FE552B.teacher-appraisal-system-2016-17-1-1-.docx