uncertainties are political (and ethical), and thus the decision that evidence is sufficient a political decision” (p. 226). is James Fredal’s paper, and “Bullshit Rhetoric,” (2011) helps to shed light on the idea of bullshit as multi-leveled. Fredal wrote: Frankfurt, discourse can be divided “For into two categories: that which is motivated by the truth and that which isn’t. He doesn’t, however, consider discourse that is motivated by multiple factors (in addition to a concern for the truth), nor does he consider
uncertainties are political (and ethical), and thus the decision that evidence is sufficient is a political decision” (p. 226). James Fredal’s paper, “Bullshit and Rhetoric,” (2011) helps to shed light on the idea of bullshit as multi-leveled. Fredal wrote: “For Frankfurt, discourse can be divided into two categories: that which is motivated by the truth and that which isn’t. He doesn’t, however, consider discourse that is motivated by multiple factors (in addition to a concern for the truth), nor does he consider
our%20paper%20on%20bs11-12-15(2).docx