they are not already doing so All Participatory Governance Group Agendas and Minutes should be on Inside Cañada Keep annual plan/program review form the same (it works) Possibly set a few overall SSPC Goals From Administrative Planning Council (APC) Completed Revised Decided Did not not to do complete Develop a general calendar of APC meetings for the year. Change hiring timeline to end by February 28 Allow new hire discussion groups to prioritize Change the group leaders to have faculty/staff facilitators Add reports from SSPC/IPC/APC/Academic Senate/Classified Senate to the PBC agendas From Academic Senate Completed Revised Decided Did not not to do complete Perhaps rearrange the agenda, but no real changes necessary. Define what the ‘desired level’ for participation it 100% of FT Faculty, 75%, or what?—and measure it. This would help to understand how much participation is really there, and to set goals for the future. PT Faculty—it might help to have a PT Faculty Senate, especially as a way to increase PT Faculty awareness of Participatory Governance (that it exists, that it’s important, and why it’s important to participate), and even change the culture of PT Faculty ‘buy-in’ of Cañada being a ‘home campus’. However, it was noted that it also might not work. FT Faculty—need more participation from those who
they are not already doing so All Participatory Governance Group Agendas and Minutes should be on Inside Cañada Keep annual plan/program review form the same (it works) Possibly set a few overall SSPC Goals From Administrative Planning Council (APC) Completed Revised Decided not to do Did not complete Develop a general calendar of APC meetings for the year. Change hiring timeline to end by February 28 Allow new hire discussion groups to prioritize Change the group leaders to have faculty/staff facilitators Add reports from SSPC/IPC/APC/Academic Senate/Classified Senate to the PBC agendas From Academic Senate Completed Revised Decided not to do Did not complete Perhaps rearrange the agenda, but no real changes necessary. Define what the ‘desired level’ for participation it 100% of FT Faculty, 75%, or what?—and measure it. This would help to understand how much participation is really there, and to set goals for the future. PT Faculty—it might help to have a PT Faculty Senate, especially as a way to increase PT Faculty awareness of Participatory Governance (that it exists, that it’s important, and why it’s important to participate), and even change the culture of PT Faculty ‘buy-in’ of Cañada being a ‘home campus’. However, it was noted that it also might not work. FT Faculty—need more participation from those who
Evaluation%20of%20the%20Participatory%20Governance%20Process_4_16_2014.docx