Affiliate ID: Performance period: Evaluation date: Employee name: Position title: Supervisor: Department: Type of review: Annual Other (describe): _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Important: Review the Evaluation rating chart and University core expectations on page two before filling out this form. Results: Summarize the employee’s performance against core job duties, projects, professional development and defined goals for the review period. Please list examples. a Enter performance rating 1 2 3 4 or 5 : .A rating of five is high, and rating of one is low. — Core expectations: How results were accomplished behaviors. – Core expectations for staff Supervisor comments Rating Comments are required for ratings one or five. It is recommended for ratings four, or two. Service-oriented, positive attitude, helpful Trustworthy, adheres to ethics and compliance standards Collaborative, team-oriented Productive, commitment to ASU Flexible, adaptable Respectful communicator Resourceful, committed to sustainability Enter core expectations rating 1 2 3 4 5: A rating of five is high, and a rating of one is low. — Final overall evaluation leader’s summary comments — an overall rating 1 2 3 4 or 5: A rating of five is high, and a rating of one is low. — Consistently exceeds Frequently exceeds Performance Inconsistently fulfills Fails to meet 5 4 3 2 1 – – – – – performance expectations. performance expectations. expectations fulfilled. performance expectations. performance expectations. Planning for next 12 months. Performance core job duties, expectations, standards and defined goals. Professional development growth in place or for advancement. — —
Affiliate ID: Performance period: Evaluation date: Employee name: Position title: Supervisor: Department: Type of review: Annual Other (describe): _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Important: Review the Evaluation rating chart and University core expectations on page two before filling out this form. Results: Summarize the employee’s performance against core job duties, projects, professional development and defined goals for the review period. Please list examples. Enter performance rating — 1 2 3 4 or 5 : .A rating of five is high, and a rating of one is low. Core expectations: How results were accomplished – behaviors. Core expectations for staff Rating Supervisor comments Comments are required for ratings one or five. It is recommended for ratings four, or two. Service-oriented, positive attitude, helpful Trustworthy, adheres to ethics and compliance standards Collaborative, team-oriented Productive, commitment to ASU Flexible, adaptable Respectful communicator Resourceful, committed to sustainability Enter core expectations rating — 1 2 3 4 5: A rating of five is high, and a rating of one is low. Final overall evaluation — leader’s summary comments an overall rating — 1 2 3 4 or 5: A rating of five is high, and a rating of one is low. 5 – Consistently exceeds performance expectations. 4 – Frequently exceeds performance expectations. 3 – Performance expectations fulfilled. 2 – Inconsistently fulfills performance expectations. 1 – Fails to meet performance expectations. Planning for next 12 months. Performance — core job duties, expectations, standards and defined goals. Professional development — growth in place or for advancement.
performance-evaluation-staff.docx