Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: 2. Consultation, Coordination, and Collaboration: Obtains information from a variety of collaterals, stakeholders, and/or other environmental sources, both formal and informal, and integrates into a coordinated service and/or project plan. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Unable to synthesize and Able to synthesize and Exceptionally able to Unable to integration information integrate information and synthesize and integrate assess and perspectives from perspectives from information and numerous stakeholders numerous stakeholders perspectives from numerous stakeholders, even when agendas are in conflict Unable to coordinate Able to coordinate Exceptionally able to Unable information and/or information and/or coordinate information to assess projects with multiple projects with a variety of and/or projects with all stakeholders stakeholders stakeholders Unable to convey Conveys information to Conveys information to all Unable to information to most stakeholders in a stakeholders in a strategic, assess stakeholders in a clear, clear, effective way persuasive manner effective way Unable to interact with, Provides effective Provides strategic Unable to coordinate with, or consultation, coordination to optimize assess collaborate with multiple collaboration, and support from and systems coordination with multiple beneficial exchanges systems among programs, agencies, and communities Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to consultation, coordination, and collaboration? Unable 1 2 3 4 5 to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below):
Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: 2. Consultation, Coordination, and Collaboration: Obtains information from a variety of collaterals, stakeholders, and/or other environmental sources, both formal and informal, and integrates into a coordinated service and/or project plan. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Unable to synthesize and integration information and perspectives from numerous stakeholders Able to synthesize and integrate information and perspectives from numerous stakeholders Exceptionally able to synthesize and integrate information and perspectives from numerous stakeholders, even when agendas are in conflict Unable to assess Unable to coordinate information and/or projects with multiple stakeholders Able to coordinate information and/or projects with a variety of stakeholders Exceptionally able to coordinate information and/or projects with all stakeholders Unable to assess Unable to convey information to stakeholders in a clear, effective way Conveys information to most stakeholders in a clear, effective way Conveys information to all stakeholders in a strategic, persuasive manner Unable to assess Unable to interact with, coordinate with, or collaborate with multiple systems Provides effective consultation, collaboration, and coordination with multiple systems Provides strategic coordination to optimize support from and beneficial exchanges among programs, agencies, and communities Unable to assess Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to consultation, coordination, and collaboration? 1 2 3 4 5 Unable to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below):
Fall%20Semester%20Progress%20Review%2C%20Second%20Year%20Management%20and%20Planning%20Students%2C%202013-2014.docx