care at home and prefer to die at home. 14. Further research on the frequency and the duration of visits is necessary in a cost utility study. Because the costs are largely determined by travel time and travel expenses, a study also should investigate if the follow-up can be performed by nurses with less travel time and costs (e.g., community nurses) or by innovative interventions such as tele-health. Nurse-Family Partnerships/ VoorZorg nurses Mejdoubi et al. (2013). 1. NR. 4. Disadvantaged pregnant 8. Primary outcome: 10. NR. 13. Home visiting women <26 years, with no psychological, physical interventions shown to be Netherlands. 2. Intervention group previous live births. (n= or sexual violence, and injury 11. Open and successful in reaching high received usual care and 460). Randomised to towards the participant (victim) dialogue risk young pregnant RCT home visits from nurse intervention (n=237) or as well as towards her partner between nurse and women and identifying at throughout pregnancy, and control (n=223). (perpetrator). Secondary patient; trusting and risk individuals. To assess the effect of until child turned 2. Control outcomes were a summation of professional VoorZorg, the Dutch Nurse- group received usual care. 5. Intimate partner forms of violence, and both relationships with HCP Suggests the need for Family Partnership violence, pregnancy. experiencing and perpetrating healthcare professionals to (NFP)on addressing 3. Usual care includes IPV. 12 NR. focus on this group due to Intimate Partner physical examination, 6 Home care. their vulnerability. Violence (IVP) monitoring development of 9. Home visit program was victimization and foetus, health education, 7. Home visits: VoorZorg effective in reducing 14. Need to screen at risk perpetration among young, postnatal advice, and nurses. Usual care: victimization by IPV. individuals/ groups and low-educated pregnant monitoring of infant’s midwives/ obstetricians. Improvement greater in address IPV risk factors e.g. women and mothers health. intervention group than control alcohol, financial group at 32 weeks of pregnancy dependency. Need for open
care at home and prefer to die at home. 14. Further research on the frequency and the duration of visits is necessary in a cost utility study. Because the costs are largely determined by travel time and travel expenses, a study also should investigate if the follow-up can be performed by nurses with less travel time and costs (e.g., community nurses) or by innovative interventions such as tele-health. Nurse-Family Partnerships/ VoorZorg nurses Mejdoubi et al. (2013). Netherlands. RCT To assess the effect of VoorZorg, the Dutch Partnership (NFP)on addressing Intimate Partner Violence (IVP) victimization and perpetration among young, low-educated pregnant women and mothers 1. NR. 2. Intervention group received usual care and home visits from nurse throughout pregnancy, and until child turned 2. Control group received usual care. 3. Usual care includes physical examination, monitoring development of foetus, health education, postnatal advice, and monitoring of infant’s health. 4. Disadvantaged pregnant women <26 years, with no previous live births. (n= 460). Randomised to intervention (n=237) or control (n=223). 5. Intimate partner violence, pregnancy. 6 Home care. 7. Home visits: VoorZorg nurses. Usual care: midwives/ obstetricians. 8. Primary outcome: psychological, physical or sexual violence, and injury towards the participant (victim) as well as towards her partner (perpetrator). Secondary outcomes were a summation of forms of violence, and both experiencing and perpetrating IPV. 9. Home visit program was effective in reducing victimization by IPV. Improvement greater in intervention group than control group at 32 weeks of pregnancy 10. NR. 11. Open and dialogue between nurse and patient; trusting and professional relationships with HCP 12 NR. 13. Home visiting interventions shown to be successful in reaching high risk young pregnant women and identifying at risk individuals. Suggests the need for healthcare professionals to focus on this group due to their vulnerability. 14. Need to screen at risk individuals/ groups and address IPV risk factors e.g. alcohol, financial dependency. Need for open Family Nurse-
12912_2017_225_MOESM1_ESM.docx