Table 3. Characteristics of Studies Retained in the Review Authors Focus Sample/Setting Measuresa Design Sampling/data collection Supervisee attachment general and Foundation level masters social work RSQ; Ex post facto; Convenience; Bennett et al. Supervisees’ self-reported (2008) supervision-specific attachment styles students/supervisees (n=72); American WAI-T cross Questionnaire and their perceptions of the supervisory field placements sectional working alliance Duffy (2003) of the impact Qualified Psychotherapist supervisors N/a Qualitative Semi structured Supervisors’ perspectives of supervisee general insecure attachment (n=9); practicing in America interview interviews styles on the supervisory alliance (Grounded Theory) Foster et al. Similarity between Supervisor-supervisee dyads (n=90 RSQ Ex post facto; Volunteer; supervisees’ (2007) general and supervision-specific dyads); across America; supervisors held cross Questionnaire attachment styles. a psychotherapy/social work sectional supervisees doctoral/master’s degree; were psychotherapy/social work trainees with four semesters of clinical experience Gnilka et al. self reported general Counselling doctoral and masters ECR-R; Ex post facto; Volunteer; Supervisees’ (2016) attachment styles and their perception of students/supervisees (n=170); American SWAI- T cross Questionnaire the supervisory working alliance internships sectional Gunn & Trainees/supervisees (n=480); American ESS; Ex post facto; Volunteer; Supervisees’ self-reported Pistole (2012) specific attachment styles and their clinical/counselling psychology doctoral SWAI-T cross Questionnaire perception of the supervisory working and masters programmes; 6.4 semesters sectional
Table 3. Characteristics of Studies Retained in the Review Authors Focus Sample/Setting Measuresa Design Sampling/data collection Supervisee attachment Bennett et al. (2008) Supervisees’ self-reported general and supervision-specific attachment styles and their perceptions of the supervisory working alliance Foundation level masters social work students/supervisees (n=72); American field placements RSQ; WAI-T Ex post facto; cross sectional Convenience; Questionnaire Duffy (2003) Supervisors’ perspectives of the impact of supervisee general insecure attachment styles on the supervisory alliance Qualified Psychotherapist supervisors (n=9); practicing in America N/a Qualitative interview (Grounded Theory) Semi structured interviews Foster et al. (2007) Similarity between supervisees’ general and supervision-specific attachment styles. Supervisor-supervisee dyads (n=90 dyads); across America; supervisors held a psychotherapy/social work doctoral/master’s degree; supervisees were psychotherapy/social work trainees with four semesters of clinical experience RSQ Ex post facto; cross sectional Volunteer; Questionnaire Gnilka et al. (2016) Supervisees’ self reported general attachment styles and their perception of the supervisory working alliance Counselling doctoral and masters students/supervisees (n=170); American internships ECR-R; SWAI- T Ex post facto; cross sectional Volunteer; Questionnaire Gunn & Pistole (2012) Supervisees’ self-reported attachment styles and their perception of the supervisory working Trainees/supervisees (n=480); American clinical/counselling psychology doctoral and masters programmes; 6.4 semesters ESS; SWAI-T Ex post facto; cross sectional Volunteer; Questionnaire specific
Ethesis%201.docx