no information on patient selection, Nepalese population unlikely to be relevant to Australia. Cosson () Level III-2 Low risk of N=1,157 consecutive Exclusions not detailed. 5.7%≥ ≥6.5% 5.5 mmol/L≥ FPG 3x3 table, Bondy, bias. patients referred to HbA1c FPG ≥7.0 ROC Hospital-based France Applicable to hospital <6.5% <7.0 mmol/L; analysis study of patients Australian clinic referred for 7.8 mmol/L≥ 2hPG setting. who fitted ADA risk weight 2hPG ≥11.1 Relevant criteria for diabetes management. <11.1 mmol/L points. and underwent diabetes tests; 17% male, mean age 41 ± 13 years. Du () Wuhan, Low risk of N=2,856 in sample, Exclusions were chronic disease 5.7%≥ 100 mmol/L≥ FPG 2x2 table, Level III-2 ≥6.5% China bias. n=2,318 recruited (n=45), blood disorder (n=13), HbA1c FPG ≥126 ROC Patients Applicability to patients referred to pregnancy (n=112), other medical <6.5% <126 mg/dL L analysis referred to Australian hospital outpatient reason (n=10), currently have diabetes setting clinic on suspicion of diabetes (n=157), rejection of blood outpatient clinic unclear as diabetes; age collection (n=103) and no information of hospital in Chinese years, mean on tests (n=98), leaving total sample China. study. 47.5 years. of n=2,318. Relevant points. Lee, H () 10 Level III-2 Low risk of N=4,616 patients who Excluded patients with known Not ≥6.1% FPG 2x2 table, sites in South bias. were referred to or diabetes, renal impairment, reported ≥7.0 ROC 10 hospital Korea Applicability to voluntarily attended conditions, conditions analysis outpatient Australian hospital clinic for known to impact on glucose clinics in South 2hPG setting diabetes diagnosis; tolerance. Numbers excluded not Korea, each ≥11.1 unclear as 55% male, mean age given. participant had Korean study. 50 ± 13 years. OGT and Relevant HbA1c as part points. of battery of
no information on patient selection, Nepalese population unlikely to be relevant to Australia. Cosson () Bondy, France Level III-2 Hospital-based study of patients referred for weight management. Low risk of bias. Applicable to Australian setting. Relevant points. N=1,157 consecutive patients referred to hospital clinic who fitted ADA risk criteria for diabetes and underwent diabetes tests; 17% male, mean age 41 ± 13 years. Exclusions not detailed. 5.7%≥ HbA1c <6.5% ≥6.5% 5.5 mmol/L≥ FPG <7.0 mmol/L; 7.8 mmol/L≥ 2hPG <11.1 mmol/L FPG ≥7.0 2hPG ≥11.1 3x3 table, ROC analysis Du () Wuhan, China Level III-2 Patients referred to diabetes outpatient clinic of hospital in China. Low risk of bias. Applicability to Australian setting unclear as Chinese study. Relevant points. N=2,856 in sample, n=2,318 recruited patients referred to hospital outpatient clinic on suspicion of diabetes; age years, mean 47.5 years. Exclusions were chronic disease (n=45), blood disorder (n=13), pregnancy (n=112), other medical reason (n=10), currently have diabetes (n=157), rejection of blood collection (n=103) and no information on tests (n=98), leaving total sample of n=2,318. 5.7%≥ HbA1c <6.5% ≥6.5% 100 mmol/L≥ FPG <126 mg/dL FPG ≥126 2x2 table, ROC analysis Lee, H () 10 sites in South Korea Level III-2 10 hospital outpatient clinics in South Korea, each participant had OGT and HbA1c as part of battery of Low risk of bias. Applicability to Australian setting unclear as Korean study. Relevant points. N=4,616 patients who were referred to or voluntarily attended hospital clinic for diabetes diagnosis; 55% male, mean age 50 ± 13 years. Excluded patients with known diabetes, renal impairment, conditions, conditions known to impact on glucose tolerance. Numbers excluded not given. Not reported ≥6.1% FPG ≥7.0 2hPG ≥11.1 2x2 table, ROC analysis L
1267-FinalContractedAssessmentReport-accessible.DOCX