Social - case studies; The Consultation and Engagement report provides information on the personal /group feedback / consultation process to develop the Strategic Plan and the feedback other: received. There were also a number of staff engagement sessions held and a report on this was considered. Best judgement over hard evidence 3.4 (a) Has ‘best 3.3(b) Who provided the 3.3cWhat gaps in judgement’ been used in ‘best judgement’ data/information were place of data/research/ identified? evidence? YES / NO Both – There has been a range Integration Joint Board of information available from Strategic Planning Group different sources and informed Strategic Planning judgement to assess and Group analyse this. Staff engagement groups Consultees 3.4(d) Is further research necessary? YES / NO If NO – please say why: Consultation 4.0 Has the proposal / policy / project been subject to involvement/consultation? If YES - state which individuals and organisations were involved / consulted; what form the involvement / consultation took and outcome. Who was List: involved/consulted: The Health and Social Care Integration (HSCI) Partnership set out to Please indicate if it was involve key stakeholders during the production of the Strategic Plan. active involvement or Service users, carers, health and social care staff, the public and key consultation partners have had various opportunities to tell us what they think and participate in the production of the Strategic Plan. This was done through a series of information and consultation methods. The list of prescribed stakeholders for the Strategic Plan is set out in the Public Bodies (Joint Working)(Scotland) Act 2014: Users of health care Users of social care Carers of users of social care Carers of users of health care Commercial providers of social care
Social - case studies; personal /group feedback / other: The Consultation and Engagement report provides information on the consultation process to develop the Strategic Plan and the feedback received. There were also a number of staff engagement sessions held and a report on this was considered. Best judgement over hard evidence 3.4 (a) Has ‘best judgement’ been used in place of data/research/ evidence? YES / NO 3.3(b) Who provided the ‘best judgement’ 3.3cWhat gaps in data/information were identified? Both – There has been a range of information available from different sources and informed judgement to assess and analyse this. Integration Joint Board Strategic Planning Group Strategic Planning Group Staff engagement groups Consultees 3.4(d) Is further research necessary? YES / NO If NO – please say why: Consultation 4.0 Has the proposal / policy / project been subject to involvement/consultation? If YES - state which individuals and organisations were involved / consulted; what form the involvement / consultation took and outcome. Who was involved/consulted: Please indicate if it was active involvement or consultation List: The Health and Social Care Integration (HSCI) Partnership set out to involve key stakeholders during the production of the Strategic Plan. Service users, carers, health and social care staff, the public and key partners have had various opportunities to tell us what they think and participate in the production of the Strategic Plan. This was done through a series of information and consultation methods. The list of prescribed stakeholders for the Strategic Plan is set out in the Public Bodies (Joint Working)(Scotland) Act 2014: Users of health care Users of social care Carers of users of social care Carers of users of health care Commercial providers of social care
Equality-and-Poverty-Impact-Assessment.docx