Nursing or Midwifery in Community with Non-Professional workers Miscellaneous Filene et al. (2013). NR 4. Pregnant women and 8. Clinical/Health outcomes: (6 10. NR. 13. NR. families with children from in total) Meta-analysis. 2. NR other than home birth to 3 years in U Maternal life course, child 11. NR. 14. NR. (n=51 studies. Type of visiting (n=unspecified) cognitive outcomes & parenting studies NR other than behavior & skills: significant 12 NR. noting that effect sizes 3. Typical child 5. Early childhood positive average effect sizes. could be calculated from development information, development (typically Birth outcomes, child physical studies). child care & routines, focus developing). health, & child. Maltreatment: on home, environment – no significant differences in “to determine which safety & cleanliness, 6. Children’s family homes effect sizes. individual home visiting attending to child’s and clinics program components emotional needs, 9. Non-professionals, matching have the most power to promoting cognitive & 7. Professional (e.g. nurse, of home visitors to clients & predict key parent and child socio-emotional psychologist, social problem solving associated outcomes” (p. S101). development, worker) & non-professional improved birth outcomes (e.g. instrumental assistance, home visitors. birthweight, absence of Selecting alternative complications). caregivers, parental Parent education on relationships & health, developmental norms, parenting practices, behavioural management & family planning, discipline techniques, self-, stress & anger responsive associated with management, support & improved parent behaviours & social networks, adult skills outcomes. literacy & academic achievements, problem Parenting practices associated solving, goal setting, with better parenting case management, behaviours & skills and with rehearsal or role-playing, cognitive outcomes in children. matching home visitor to client e.g. race, ethnicity, Professional home visitor standardized curriculum. predicted better child physical health,
Nursing or Midwifery in Community with Non-Professional workers Miscellaneous Filene et al. (2013). Meta-analysis. (n=51 studies. Type of studies NR other than noting that effect sizes could be calculated from studies). “to determine which individual home visiting program components have the most power to predict key parent and child outcomes” (p. S101). NR 2. NR other than home visiting 3. Typical child development information, child care & routines, focus on home, environment – safety & cleanliness, attending to child’s emotional needs, promoting cognitive & socio-emotional development, instrumental assistance, Selecting alternative caregivers, parental relationships & health, parenting practices, family planning, self-, stress & anger management, support & social networks, adult literacy & academic achievements, problem solving, goal setting, case management, rehearsal or role-playing, matching home visitor to client e.g. race, ethnicity, standardized curriculum. 4. Pregnant women and families with children from birth to 3 years in U (n=unspecified) 5. Early childhood development (typically developing). 6. Children’s family homes and clinics 7. Professional (e.g. nurse, psychologist, social worker) & non-professional home visitors. 8. Clinical/Health outcomes: (6 in total) Maternal life course, child cognitive outcomes & parenting behavior & skills: significant positive average effect sizes. Birth outcomes, child physical health, & child. Maltreatment: no significant differences in effect sizes. 9. Non-professionals, matching of home visitors to clients & problem solving associated improved birth outcomes (e.g. birthweight, absence of complications). Parent education on developmental norms, behavioural management & discipline techniques, responsive associated with improved parent behaviours & skills outcomes. Parenting practices associated with better parenting behaviours & skills and with cognitive outcomes in children. Professional home visitor predicted better child physical health, 10. NR. 11. NR. 12 NR. 13. NR. 14. NR.
12912_2017_225_MOESM1_ESM.docx