s. 15 (7) An affidavit or statutory declaration by a person who has served a copy of the certificate on the accused is admissible in evidence at a hearing referred to in subsection (2) and, as to the service of the copy, is proof, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, of the facts and matters deposed to in the affidavit or stated in the statutory declaration. (8) An accused who has been served with a copy of a certificate given under this section may, with the leave of the court and not otherwise, require the person who has given the certificate or any person employed, or engaged to provide services at, the place at which the sample of oral fluid was provided, to attend at all subsequent proceedings for cross-examination and that person must attend accordingly. (9) The court must not grant leave under subsection (8) unless it is satisfied— (a) that the informant has been given at least 7 days' notice of the hearing of the application for leave and has been given an opportunity to make a submission to the court; and (b) that— (i) there is a reasonable possibility that the oral fluid referred to in a certificate given by an analyst under subsection (4) was not that of the accused; or
(7) An affidavit or statutory declaration by a person who has served a copy of the certificate on the accused is admissible in evidence at a hearing referred to in subsection (2) and, as to the service of the copy, is proof, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, of the facts and matters deposed to in the affidavit or stated in the statutory declaration. s. 15 (8) An accused who has been served with a copy of a certificate given under this section may, with the leave of the court and not otherwise, require the person who has given the certificate or any person employed, or engaged to provide services at, the place at which the sample of oral fluid was provided, to attend at all subsequent proceedings for cross-examination and that person must attend accordingly. (9) The court must not grant leave under subsection (8) unless it is satisfied— (a) that the informant has been given at least 7 days' notice of the hearing of the application for leave and has been given an opportunity to make a submission to the court; and (b) that— (i) there is a reasonable possibility that the oral fluid referred to in a certificate given by an analyst under subsection (4) was not that of the accused; or
12-066a.docx