Table 22: Risk of bias at study level: randomised studies Study Adequate Adequate Blinding Incomplete Selective Overall risk of reference/ generation of a allocation outcome outcome bias Patient Medical personnel ID randomisation concealment reporting reporting (carer, sequence unlikely? investigator, outcome assessor) Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Low/high Note: an a low risk of bias, and an answer indicates high risk of bias answer ‘yes’ indicates ‘no’ If the answer is or give reasons for the classification ‘unclear’ ‘no’, please
Table 22: Risk of bias at study level: randomised studies Study reference/ ID Adequate generation of a randomisation sequence Adequate allocation concealment Blinding Incomplete outcome reporting Selective outcome reporting unlikely? Overall risk of bias Patient Medical personnel (carer, investigator, outcome assessor) Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Yes/no/unclear Low/high Note: an answer ‘yes’ indicates a low risk of bias, and an answer ‘no’ indicates high risk of bias If the answer is ‘unclear’ or ‘no’, please give reasons for the classification
EUnetHTA-evidence-submission-template_meddev_long-FINAL3_docxversion.docx