Development mitigates the potential adverse effects of noise, dust, ground vibration or blast overpressure to ensure safety of people and property in proximity to a hazardous or explosive facility. Criteria for assessment Part A Criteria for assessable development – Table 8.2.8.3.a Hazardous and explosive facilities overlay code Assessable development – – Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes For assessable development All development PO1 AO1.1 Development does not compromise the continued No acceptable outcomes are provided. safety, efficiency and operational integrity of a hazardous or explosive facility. PO2 AO2.1 Development is located, designed and operated No acceptable outcomes are provided. to mitigate the potential adverse impacts arising from a hazardous or explosive facility. Explosive facility area PO3 AO3.1 Development avoids uses that are vulnerable to Unless there is a pre-existing development the direct effects of radiant heat and commitment, development does not: projectiles. (a) include a new vulnerable land use; (b) intensify an existing vulnerable land use. PO4 AO4.1 Development is located, designed and operated No acceptable outcomes are provided. to ensure that potential adverse impacts from noise, dust, ground vibration or air blast overpressure are minimised to the greatest extent practicable. Major hazard facility area PO5 AO5.1 Development is compatible with the risk Development within a Major hazard facility area associated with a major hazard facility. does not result in the establishment or ‘A’ expansion of a vulnerable land use, sensitive land use or commercial land use. AO5.2 Development within a Major hazard facility area does not result in the expansion or ‘B’ establishment of a vulnerable land use. Hillslopes overlay code Application This code applies to assessing development within the Hillslopes overlay.
Development mitigates the potential adverse effects of noise, dust, ground vibration or blast overpressure to ensure safety of people and property in proximity to a hazardous or explosive facility. Criteria for assessment Part A – Criteria for assessable development Table 8.2.8.3.a – Hazardous and explosive facilities overlay code – Assessable development Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes For assessable development All development PO1 Development does not compromise the continued safety, efficiency and operational integrity of a hazardous or explosive facility. AO1.1 No acceptable outcomes are provided. PO2 Development is located, designed and operated to mitigate the potential adverse impacts arising from a hazardous or explosive facility. AO2.1 No acceptable outcomes are provided. Explosive facility area PO3 Development avoids uses that are vulnerable to the direct effects of radiant heat and projectiles. AO3.1 Unless there is a pre-existing development commitment, development does not: (a) include a new vulnerable land use; (b) intensify an existing vulnerable land use. PO4 Development is located, designed and operated to ensure that potential adverse impacts from noise, dust, ground vibration or air blast overpressure are minimised to the greatest extent practicable. AO4.1 No acceptable outcomes are provided. Major hazard facility area PO5 Development is compatible with the risk associated with a major hazard facility. AO5.1 Development within a Major hazard facility area ‘A’ does not result in the establishment or expansion of a vulnerable land use, sensitive land use or commercial land use. AO5.2 Development within a Major hazard facility area ‘B’ does not result in the expansion or establishment of a vulnerable land use. Hillslopes overlay code Application This code applies to assessing development within the Hillslopes overlay.
Part-8-v1.2.docx