12. Percent of children referred Monitoring by Part C prior to age 3, who are Activities: found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and Local APR, 6 6 5 implemented by their third Data Review, birthdays. Desk Audit, Visits, or Other Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 13. Percent of youth aged 16 Monitoring and above with IEP that includes Activities: appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are APR, Data 11 11 11 annually updated and based Review, Desk upon an age appropriate Audit, On-Site transition assessment, transition Visits, or Other services, including courses of Dispute study, that will reasonably Resolution: enable the student to meet Complaints, those postsecondary goals, and 1 1 1 Hearings annual IEP goals related to the student’s transition service needs. Other areas of noncompliance: Monitoring Faculty, staff and administration Activities: Local APR, 10 10 8 Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other Dispute Resolution: Complaints, 1 1 1 Hearings
12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays. Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 6 6 5 Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 13. Percent of youth aged 16 and above with IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student’s transition service needs. Monitoring Activities: APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, On-Site Visits, or Other 11 11 11 Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 1 1 1 Other areas of noncompliance: Faculty, staff and administration Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 10 10 8 Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 1 1 1
FFY2012.docx