PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Specific References to Intervenor’s CPUC Discussion Contribution(s) Claimed Contribution(s) Energy Savings Target Verified Brightline argued the Brightline Opening Brief, 7/6/15, energy savings goal p. 2. needed to consider factors D.16-11-022, p. 48-51. other than Brightline comments on PD/APD Brightline supported the adopting measures in response to 10% energy savings the Aliso Canyon gas leak, reduction requirement in 4/15/16, p. 2. the Aliso Canyon area D.16-04-040, p. 25. during the gas leak emergency. Go-Back Rule Verified Brightline initially Brightline Opening Brief, 7/6/15, recommended the p. 2. Commission modify the D.16-11-022, p. 55-56 & 61-62 Go-Back Rule and return to the 8 year standard rather than the 10 year standard. Though the Commission eliminated the Go-Back rule, the 8 year modification was discussed extensively by Brightline comments on the PG&E and other parties, PD/APD, 9/16/16, p. 2-3. D.16-11-022, p. 66. Brightline supported the elimination of the Rule.
PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion Energy Savings Target Brightline argued the energy savings goal needed to consider factors other than Brightline supported the 10% energy savings reduction requirement in the Aliso Canyon area during the gas leak emergency. Brightline Opening Brief, 7/6/15, p. 2. D.16-11-022, p. 48-51. Brightline comments on PD/APD adopting measures in response to the Aliso Canyon gas leak, 4/15/16, p. 2. D.16-04-040, p. 25. Verified Go-Back Rule Brightline initially recommended the Commission modify the Go-Back Rule and return to the 8 year standard rather than the 10 year standard. Though the Commission eliminated the Go-Back rule, the 8 year modification was discussed extensively by PG&E and other parties, Brightline supported the elimination of the Rule. Brightline Opening Brief, 7/6/15, p. 2. D.16-11-022, p. 55-56 & 61-62 Brightline comments on the PD/APD, 9/16/16, p. 2-3. D.16-11-022, p. 66. Verified
178869245.docx