Very Good: The offer satisfies the selection criterion in all respects. The evaluator has 5 complete certainty and without reservation, that the Service Provider will be able to meet the required standard at the highest level. The Service Provider’s claims are fully supported by the information provided. The supporting information is comprehensive and complete. Good: The offer satisfies the selection criterion in all respects. The evaluator has no 4 reason to believe that the Service Provider will not meet the required standard. The Service Provider’s claims are fully supported by the information provided. Supporting information is comprehensive and complete. Satisfactory: The offer satisfies the selection criterion to an acceptable degree. There are some 3 minor deficiencies and shortcomings in the scope and detail of the supporting information and the evaluator has some reservations regarding the complete satisfaction of the required standard. Marginal: The offer has some short comings and does not fully satisfy the selection criterion. 2 There are some deficiencies in the scope and detail of the supporting information and the evaluator has some reservations regarding the Service Provider’s ability to satisfy the required standard. Poor: The offer barely satisfies, or does not satisfy, the selection criterion. There are 1 major deficiencies in the scope and detail of the supporting information and the evaluator has significant reservations regarding the Service Provider’s ability to satisfy the required standard. Not Compliant: The offer does not satisfy the selection criterion. There are major deficiencies in 0 all aspects of the supporting information and the evaluator considers that the Service Provider has not satisfied the required standard. ATTACHMENT H – RESPONDENT’S DECLARATION Respondent's Declaration an authorised officer of.................................................…............................……................[organisation]
Very Good: The offer satisfies the selection criterion in all respects. The evaluator has complete certainty and without reservation, that the Service Provider will be able to meet the required standard at the highest level. The Service Provider’s claims are fully supported by the information provided. The supporting information is comprehensive and complete. 5 Good: The offer satisfies the selection criterion in all respects. The evaluator has no reason to believe that the Service Provider will not meet the required standard. The Service Provider’s claims are fully supported by the information provided. Supporting information is comprehensive and complete. 4 Satisfactory: The offer satisfies the selection criterion to an acceptable degree. There are some minor deficiencies and shortcomings in the scope and detail of the supporting information and the evaluator has some reservations regarding the complete satisfaction of the required standard. 3 Marginal: The offer has some short comings and does not fully satisfy the selection criterion. There are some deficiencies in the scope and detail of the supporting information and the evaluator has some reservations regarding the Service Provider’s ability to satisfy the required standard. 2 Poor: The offer barely satisfies, or does not satisfy, the selection criterion. There are major deficiencies in the scope and detail of the supporting information and the evaluator has significant reservations regarding the Service Provider’s ability to satisfy the required standard. 1 Not Compliant: The offer does not satisfy the selection criterion. There are major deficiencies in all aspects of the supporting information and the evaluator considers that the Service Provider has not satisfied the required standard. 0 ATTACHMENT H – RESPONDENT’S DECLARATION Respondent's Declaration an authorised officer of.................................................…............................……................[organisation]
FIN009171%20-%20PEMS%20Expression%20of%20Interest.docx