stakeholders in the country, as well as help monitor progress over time. Suggestions for the type of information required are provided. You may also provide further information you think is relevant, or links to further documentation. If ‘Very high (100)’ or ‘n/a’ is selected, a justification should be provided. 2. Institutions and Participation Degree of implementation (0 – 100) Very low (0) Low (20) Medium-low (40) Medium-high (60) High (80) Very high (100) 2.1 What is the status of institutions for IWRM implementation at the national level? a National government No dedicated Authorities exist, with Authorities have clear Authorities have the Authorities have the Authorities have the authorities’ capacity government clear mandate to lead capacity to effectively capacity to capacity to effectively mandate to lead for leading authorities for water water resources lead IWRM plan effectively lead lead periodic IWRM IWRM implementation of resources management. implementation. periodic monitoring plan revision. implementation, and national IWRM plans management. and evaluation of the capacity to or similar the IWRM plan. effectively lead IWRM plan formulation. Score or [Enter score] Justification/evidence [Enter text here. E.g. reference to authorities and mandates, levels of capacity, reports] n/a: b Coordination No communication Communication: Consultation: Participation: Representation: Co-decisions and co- between national between different Information on water Information, Opportunities for Formal consultation production: government government sectors resources, policy, experiences and different sectors to take between different Shared power between authorities on policy, planning planning and opinions are shared part in policy, planning government sectors different sectors on representing and management. management is made between different and management with the objective of joint policy, planning different sectors on available between sectors. processes. agreeing on and management water resources, different sectors. collective decisions activities. policy, planning and on important issues management and activities. Score or [Enter score] Justification/evidence [Enter text here. E.g. reference to mechanisms for cross-sectoral coordination, evidence of meetings, reports] n/a:
stakeholders in the country, as well as help monitor progress over time. Suggestions for the type of information required are provided. You may also provide further information you think is relevant, or links to further documentation. If ‘Very high (100)’ or ‘n/a’ is selected, a justification should be provided. 2. Institutions and Participation Degree of implementation (0 – 100) Very low (0) Low (20) Medium-low (40) Medium-high (60) High (80) Very high (100) 2.1 What is the status of institutions for IWRM implementation at the national level? a National government authorities’ capacity for leading implementation of national IWRM plans or similar No dedicated government authorities for water resources management. Authorities exist, with clear mandate to lead water resources management. Authorities have clear mandate to lead IWRM implementation, and the capacity to effectively lead IWRM plan formulation. Authorities have the capacity to effectively lead IWRM plan implementation. Authorities have the capacity to effectively lead periodic monitoring and evaluation of the IWRM plan. Authorities have the capacity to effectively lead periodic IWRM plan revision. Score or n/a: [Enter score] Justification/evidence [Enter text here. E.g. reference to authorities and mandates, levels of capacity, reports] b Coordination between national government authorities representing different sectors on water resources, policy, planning and management No communication between different government sectors on policy, planning and management. Communication: Information on water resources, policy, planning and management is made available between different sectors. Consultation: Information, experiences and opinions are shared between different sectors. Participation: Opportunities for different sectors to take part in policy, planning and management processes. Representation: Formal consultation between different government sectors with the objective of agreeing on collective decisions on important issues and activities. Co-decisions and co- production: Shared power between different sectors on joint policy, planning and management activities. Score or n/a: [Enter score] Justification/evidence [Enter text here. E.g. reference to mechanisms for cross-sectoral coordination, evidence of meetings, reports]
ENG_6_5_1_Questionnaire.docx