Category Ratings: Transfer your team’s ratings from each category to the following chart and add the scores together for the overall score: Category ratings Total Category I: Category II: Category III: NGSS 3D Design NGSS Instructional Supports Monitoring NGSS Student Score Progress 9 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 E: Example of high quality NGSS design—High quality design for the NGSS across all Overall ratings: three categories of the rubric; a lesson or unit with this rating will still need adjustments Circle the overall rating below: The score total is an for a specific classroom, but the support is there to make this possible; exemplifies approximate guide for the most criteria across Categories I, II, & III of the rubric. (total score ~8–9) rating. Reviewers should use the evidence of quality across E/I: Example of high quality NGSS design if Improved—Adequate design for the NGSS, categories to guide the final but would benefit from some improvement in one or more categories; most criteria rating. In other words, the have at least adequate evidence (total score ~6–7) E E/I R N rating could differ from the total score recommendations if the R: Revision needed—Partially designed for the NGSS, but needs significant revision in reviewer has evidence to one or more categories (total ~3–5) support this variation. designed for the NGSS; does not meet criteria N: Not ready to review—Not (total 0–2) Overall Summary Comments:
Category Ratings: Transfer your team’s ratings from each category to the following chart and add the scores together for the overall score: Category ratings Total Score Category I: NGSS 3D Design Category II: NGSS Instructional Supports Category III: Monitoring NGSS Student Progress 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 9 Overall ratings: The score total is an approximate guide for the rating. Reviewers should use the evidence of quality across categories to guide the final rating. In other words, the rating could differ from the total score recommendations if the reviewer has evidence to support this variation. E: Example of high quality NGSS design—High quality design for the NGSS across all three categories of the rubric; a lesson or unit with this rating will still need adjustments for a specific classroom, but the support is there to make this possible; exemplifies most criteria across Categories I, II, & III of the rubric. (total score ~8–9) E/I: Example of high quality NGSS design if Improved—Adequate design for the NGSS, but would benefit from some improvement in one or more categories; most criteria have at least adequate evidence (total score ~6–7) R: Revision needed—Partially designed for the NGSS, but needs significant revision in one or more categories (total ~3–5) N: Not ready to review—Not designed for the NGSS; does not meet criteria (total 0–2) Circle the overall rating below: E E/I R N Overall Summary Comments:
EQuIP-Rubric-Essential-Physics.docx