requirement under a prior public contract, a If yes please provide details at 3.2 prior contract with a contracting entity, or a prior concession contract, which led to early termination of that prior contract, damages or other comparable sanctions? 3.1(j) Please answer the following statements Yes ☐ 3.1(j) - (i) The organisation is guilty of serious No ☐ misrepresentation in supplying the If Yes please provide details at information required for the verification of 3.2 the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria. Yes ☐ The organisation has withheld such 3.1(j) - (ii) information. No ☐ If Yes please provide details at 3.2 The organisation is not able to submit 3.1(j) –(iii) supporting documents required under Yes ☐ regulation 59 of the Public Contracts No ☐ Regulations 2015. If Yes please provide details at 3.2 The organisation has influenced the 3.1(j)-(iv) decision-making process of the contracting authority to obtain confidential information Yes ☐ that may confer upon the organisation No ☐ undue advantages in the procurement If Yes please provide details at procedure, or to negligently provided 3.2 misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award. 3.2 If you have answered Yes to any of the above, explain what measures been taken to demonstrate the reliability of the organisation despite the existence of a relevant ground for exclusion? (Self Cleaning) Part 3: Selection Questions Section Economic and Financial Standing 4 Question Response
requirement under a prior public contract, a prior contract with a contracting entity, or a prior concession contract, which led to early termination of that prior contract, damages or other comparable sanctions? If yes please provide details at 3.2 3.1(j) 3.1(j) - (i) 3.1(j) - (ii) 3.1(j) –(iii) 3.1(j)-(iv) Please answer the following statements The organisation is guilty of serious misrepresentation in supplying the information required for the verification of the absence of grounds for exclusion or the fulfilment of the selection criteria. The organisation has withheld such information. The organisation is not able to submit supporting documents required under regulation 59 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. The organisation has influenced the decision-making process of the contracting authority to obtain confidential information that may confer upon the organisation undue advantages in the procurement procedure, or to negligently provided misleading information that may have a material influence on decisions concerning exclusion, selection or award. Yes ☐ No ☐ If Yes please provide details at 3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ If Yes please provide details at 3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ If Yes please provide details at 3.2 Yes ☐ No ☐ If Yes please provide details at 3.2 3.2 If you have answered Yes to any of the above, explain what measures been taken to demonstrate the reliability of the organisation despite the existence of a relevant ground for exclusion? (Self Cleaning) Part 3: Selection Questions Section 4 Economic and Financial Standing Question Response
enhanced%20learner%20support%20itt%20v2%2012-05-17.docx