CE Program Title Sponsoring organization Date On your screen click to mark your choice in each of the rows, according to the How to fill out this form: options in the black bars. Alternatively, you can print the form and use a pen. Neither Instruction Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree nor Agree Agree Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 1. The program objectives were met. A. Objective #1 (Write out specific objective) B. Objective #2 (Write out specific objective) C. Objective #3 etc. (Write out specific objective) 2. Accuracy and utility of content were discussed 3. Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training 4. Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training 5. Teaching methods were effective 6. Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content Instructor 1: Neither Strongly Agree Strongly Name: Disagree Disagree nor Agree Agree Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 7. Knew the subject matter 8. Presented content effectively (e.g., promoted deep reasoning and learning; included a consideration of obstacles or anomalies) 9. Elaborated upon the stated objectives 10. Maintained my interest 11. Answered questions effectively 12. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions 13. Provided a variety of applied examples (e.g., case presentations) Instructor 2: Neither Strongly Agree Strongly Name: Disagree Disagree nor Agree Agree Disagree 1 2 3 4 5 14. Knew the subject matter 15. Presented content effectively (e.g., promoted deep reasoning and learning. Included a consideration of obstacles or anomalies) 16. Elaborated upon the stated objectives 17. Maintained my interest 18. Answered questions effectively 19. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions 20. Provided a variety of applied examples (e.g., case presentations) Professional & Ethical Issues
CE Program Title Sponsoring organization Date How to fill out this form: On your screen click to mark your choice in each of the rows, according to the options in the black bars. Alternatively, you can print the form and use a pen. Instruction Strongly Disagree 1 Disagree 2 Neither Agree nor Disagree 3 Agree 4 Strongly Agree 5 1. The program objectives were met. A. Objective #1 (Write out specific objective) B. Objective #2 (Write out specific objective) C. Objective #3 etc. (Write out specific objective) 2. Accuracy and utility of content were discussed 3. Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training 4. Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training 5. Teaching methods were effective 6. Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content Instructor 1: Name: Strongly Disagree 1 Disagree 2 Neither Agree nor Disagree 3 Agree 4 Strongly Agree 5 7. Knew the subject matter 8. Presented content effectively (e.g., promoted deep reasoning and learning; included a consideration of obstacles or anomalies) 9. Elaborated upon the stated objectives 10. Maintained my interest 11. Answered questions effectively 12. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions 13. Provided a variety of applied examples (e.g., case presentations) Instructor 2: Name: Strongly Disagree 1 Disagree 2 Neither Agree nor Disagree 3 Agree 4 Strongly Agree 5 14. Knew the subject matter 15. Presented content effectively (e.g., promoted deep reasoning and learning. Included a consideration of obstacles or anomalies) 16. Elaborated upon the stated objectives 17. Maintained my interest 18. Answered questions effectively 19. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions 20. Provided a variety of applied examples (e.g., case presentations) Professional & Ethical Issues
evaluation-tool.docx