Monitoring 3D student performances: Elicits direct, observable evidence of three-dimensional learning; students are using practices with core ideas and crosscutting concepts to make None sense of phenomena and/or to design solutions. Inadequate Adequate Extensive Formative: Embeds formative assessment processes throughout that evaluate student learning to inform instruction. None Inadequate Adequate Extensive Scoring guidance: Includes aligned rubrics and scoring guidelines that provide guidance for interpreting student performance along the None three dimensions to support teachers in (a) planning instruction and (b) providing ongoing feedback to students. Inadequate Adequate Extensive Unbiased tasks/items: Assesses student proficiency using methods, vocabulary, representations, and examples that are accessible and None unbiased for all students. Inadequate Adequate Extensive Rating for Category III. Monitoring NGSS Student Progress—lessons Lesson Rating scale for Category III (Criteria A–D only): Circle Rating After carefully weighing the evidence, reasoning, and suggestions for 3: At least adequate evidence for all criteria in the category; extensive evidence improvement, rate the degree to which the lesson met this category. for at least one criterion 2: Some evidence for all criteria in the category and adequate evidence for at least If you are evaluating an instructional unit rather than a single lesson, 0 1 2 3 three criteria, including A continue on to evaluate criteria E–F and rate Category III overall below. 1: Adequate evidence for at least two criteria in the category 0: Adequate evidence for no more than one criterion in the category Category III: Monitoring NGSS Student Progress (additional criteria for units only) If you are evaluating a lesson, it is not necessary to evaluate criteria E–F. Please enter your rating for a lesson above (after D). Unit Criteria Specific evidence from materials and reviewers’ Evidence Suggestions for A unit or longer lesson designed for the NGSS will also include clear and reasoning of Quality? improvement compelling evidence of the following:
Monitoring 3D student performances: Elicits direct, observable evidence of three-dimensional learning; students are using practices with core ideas and crosscutting concepts to make sense of phenomena and/or to design solutions. None Inadequate Adequate Extensive Formative: Embeds formative assessment processes throughout that evaluate student learning to inform instruction. None Inadequate Adequate Extensive Scoring guidance: Includes aligned rubrics and scoring guidelines that provide guidance for interpreting student performance along the three dimensions to support teachers in (a) planning instruction and (b) providing ongoing feedback to students. None Inadequate Adequate Extensive Unbiased tasks/items: Assesses student proficiency using methods, vocabulary, representations, and examples that are accessible and unbiased for all students. None Inadequate Adequate Extensive Rating for Category III. Monitoring NGSS Student Progress—lessons After carefully weighing the evidence, reasoning, and suggestions for improvement, rate the degree to which the lesson met this category. If you are evaluating an instructional unit rather than a single lesson, continue on to evaluate criteria E–F and rate Category III overall below. Lesson Rating scale for Category III (Criteria A–D only): 3: At least adequate evidence for all criteria in the category; extensive evidence for at least one criterion 2: Some evidence for all criteria in the category and adequate evidence for at least three criteria, including A 1: Adequate evidence for at least two criteria in the category 0: Adequate evidence for no more than one criterion in the category Circle Rating 0 1 2 3 Category III: Monitoring NGSS Student Progress (additional criteria for units only) If you are evaluating a lesson, it is not necessary to evaluate criteria E–F. Please enter your rating for a lesson above (after D). Unit Criteria A unit or longer lesson designed for the NGSS will also include clear and compelling evidence of the following: Specific evidence from materials and reviewers’ reasoning Evidence of Quality? Suggestions for improvement
EQuIP%20Rubric%20for%20Science%20v3.docx