then, was to establish a good understanding of the condition of each individual participant as they entered the SDP. Selected questions from the questionnaire as well as information from the Week Activity Logs shed light on each participant's discipleship life as they entered the project. How each participant allocated the hours of their weeks gave insight into the lives of the participants. Each participant's discipleship satisfaction level and discipleship adequacy level were measured at the beginning of the project. These indications formed the baseline against which the effectiveness of the project will be measured. The second task to understand the effect the SDP had on the individual participants was to examine each participant's experience in the SDP. How active was the participant in the project? How committed was the participant in fulfilling the discipleship commitments the entire group agreed upon in the SDP Covenant Statement at the Initial Weekend Seminar? What patterns developed throughout the ten-week project, and what lessons did the participants glean from those discovered patterns? How did the encouragement and admonition of the other participants influence each participant throughout the project? How did the participant evaluate their involvement in the project? Finally, the third task was to determine what results can be seen in the participant over the duration of the project. Did the perceived adequacy of the discipleship practices of the participant increase over the course of the project? Did the participant's satisfaction with their discipleship practice increase at the end of the project? What resulted in light of the questions identified in chapter 3 that each participant faced as they entered the project? Based on all of the above data an overall assessment will be determined about the effectiveness of the project on each individual participant.
then, was to establish a good understanding of the condition of each individual participant as they entered the SDP. Selected questions from the questionnaire as well as information from the Week Activity Logs shed light on each participant's discipleship life as they entered the project. How each participant allocated the hours of their weeks gave insight into the lives of the participants. Each participant's discipleship satisfaction level and discipleship adequacy level were measured at the beginning of the project. These indications formed the baseline against which the effectiveness of the project will be measured. The second task to understand the effect the SDP had on the individual participants was to examine each participant's experience in the SDP. How active was the participant in the project? How committed was the participant in fulfilling the discipleship commitments the entire group agreed upon in the SDP Covenant Statement at the Initial Weekend Seminar? What patterns developed throughout the ten-week project, and what lessons did the participants glean from those discovered patterns? How did the encouragement and admonition of the other participants influence each participant throughout the project? How did the participant evaluate their involvement in the project? Finally, the third task was to determine what results can be seen in the participant over the duration of the project. Did the perceived adequacy of the discipleship practices of the participant increase over the course of the project? Did the participant's satisfaction with their discipleship practice increase at the end of the project? What resulted in light of the questions identified in chapter 3 that each participant faced as they entered the project? Based on all of the above data an overall assessment will be determined about the effectiveness of the project on each individual participant.
EN_Sunberg_PRP.docx