Measure 4.1: Does the Growth Plan provide a path towards achieving exponential, rather than linear, growth in the number of people served by PACE 2.0 i.e. from 40,000 individuals to 200,000 individuals? Measure 4.2: Is the growth plan clear in how the scale and spread strategies complement each other? Measure 4.3: Is the rural-specific spread strategy sufficiently adapted to meet the challenges of serving these areas and populations? Deliverable 5: Provider Action Guide: Prioritizing and Planning for PACE Growth Measure 5.1: Is the Provider Guide actionable for a current PACE organization to prioritize, plan for and achieve PACE growth? Measure 5.2: Is the Provider Guide actionable for a prospective PACE organization to prioritize, plan for and achieve PACE growth? Measure 5.3: Does the Provider Guide address provider opportunities in large, midsize and rural service areas? Outcome 5: Outreach Measure 4.1: To what extent are the project’s analyses, results and recommendations about PACE dissemination opportunities communicated to federal and state policy makers? Measure 4.2: What is the number of provider organizations to whom the PACE 2.0 projected impact population estimates at the service level are distributed, including distribution at individual meetings, conferences and through on-line access? Measure 4.3: Does the outreach to consumer groups reflect the range of high need, high cost subpopulations the PACE 2.0 models could serve? Leverage and Sustainability The proposed project brings together funding support from The John A. Hartford Foundation and West Health to leverage the resources of each. The project is also in a position to leverage support from the Commonwealth Fund for an invited proposal that would augment its potential service population analysis and policy outreach goals. In addition, the National PACE Association is providing in-kind staff contributions to the project for the following:
Measure 4.1: Does the Growth Plan provide a path towards achieving exponential, rather than linear, growth in the number of people served by PACE 2.0 i.e. from 40,000 individuals to 200,000 individuals? Measure 4.2: Is the growth plan clear in how the scale and spread strategies complement each other? Measure 4.3: Is the rural-specific spread strategy sufficiently adapted to meet the challenges of serving these areas and populations? Deliverable 5: Provider Action Guide: Prioritizing and Planning for PACE Growth Measure 5.1: Is the Provider Guide actionable for a current PACE organization to prioritize, plan for and achieve PACE growth? Measure 5.2: Is the Provider Guide actionable for a prospective PACE organization to prioritize, plan for and achieve PACE growth? Measure 5.3: Does the Provider Guide address provider opportunities in large, midsize and rural service areas? Outcome 5: Outreach Measure 4.1: To what extent are the project’s analyses, results and recommendations about PACE dissemination opportunities communicated to federal and state policy makers? Measure 4.2: What is the number of provider organizations to whom the PACE 2.0 projected impact population estimates at the service level are distributed, including distribution at individual meetings, conferences and through on-line access? Measure 4.3: Does the outreach to consumer groups reflect the range of high need, high cost subpopulations the PACE 2.0 models could serve? Leverage and Sustainability The proposed project brings together funding support from The John A. Hartford Foundation and West Health to leverage the resources of each. The project is also in a position to leverage support from the Commonwealth Fund for an invited proposal that would augment its potential service population analysis and policy outreach goals. In addition, the National PACE Association is providing in-kind staff contributions to the project for the following:
PACE%202.0%20Final%20Proposal.docx