What were the costs? What were the cost-benefits? Adapted from: Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, 2001(89), 7-98. Evaluation Plan Example #1: UTSA DHS Evaluation Plan Logic Model Component Indicator How Collected When Collected Activities (Management Focus) Developed Long-Range Strategic Compliance; Stakeholder Review of Project Dec 2014; Aug 2015; Plan (P2 g) Perceived Quality Documents; Aug 2016; Aug 2018 Communication Goals (P2 g) Interviews with Early Career Awardees and Outreach Goals (P2 g) Mentors Established Evaluation Metrics Stakeholder Perceived Interviews with Early Sept 2014; Annually in (P2 h) Quality Career Awardees and August Thereafter Mentors Establish an Enduring and Compliance with Project Review of Project Fall 2014 for launch in Comprehensive Program of Study Plan; Perceived Quality Documents; Spring 2015; Annually (P2 a) Interviews with Early in August Thereafter Career Awardees, Mentors and DHS Scholars Advisory Group Meetings Compliance with Project Review of Project Biannually (August Plan; Impact of Meetings Documents; and February – Interviews with Early Tentative) Career Awardees and Mentors PI Travel Compliance Interviews with Early Aug 2015; Annually in Career Awardees and August Thereafter Mentors Consulting for Curriculum Compliance; Stakeholder Interviews with Dr. Fall 2014 and as Development Perceived Quality Nikki Austin needed with Advisory (Curriculum Board and Mentor Consultant), Early Consultation Career Awardees and Mentors Establish Meaningful Partnerships Compliance; Issues to Be Interviews with COE Dec 2014; Aug 2015; with COEs (P2 e) Resolved PI’s, Early Career Annually in August Awardees and Thereafter Mentors Implemented Long-Range Compliance with Review of Project Spring 2015; Annually Strategic Plan (P2 g) Plan Created by the Documents; in August Thereafter UTSA Grant Faculty/Staff Interviews with Early Communication Goals (P2 g) Career Awardees and Outreach Goals (P2 g) Mentors
What were the costs? What were the cost-benefits? Adapted from: Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation, 2001(89), 7-98. Evaluation Plan Example #1: UTSA DHS Evaluation Plan Logic Model Component Indicator How Collected When Collected Activities (Management Focus) Developed Long-Range Strategic Plan (P2 g) Communication Goals (P2 g) Outreach Goals (P2 g) Compliance; Stakeholder Perceived Quality Review of Project Documents; Interviews with Early Career Awardees and Mentors Dec 2014; Aug 2015; Aug 2016; Aug 2018 Established Evaluation Metrics (P2 h) Stakeholder Perceived Quality Interviews with Early Career Awardees and Mentors Sept 2014; Annually in August Thereafter Establish an Enduring and Comprehensive Program of Study (P2 a) Compliance with Project Plan; Perceived Quality Review of Project Documents; Interviews with Early Career Awardees, Mentors and DHS Scholars Fall 2014 for launch in Spring 2015; Annually in August Thereafter Advisory Group Meetings Compliance with Project Plan; Impact of Meetings Review of Project Documents; Interviews with Early Career Awardees and Mentors Biannually (August and February – Tentative) PI Travel Compliance Interviews with Early Career Awardees and Mentors Aug 2015; Annually in August Thereafter Consulting for Curriculum Development Compliance; Stakeholder Perceived Quality Interviews with Dr. Nikki Austin (Curriculum Consultant), Early Career Awardees and Mentors Fall 2014 and as needed with Advisory Board and Mentor Consultation Establish Meaningful Partnerships with COEs (P2 e) Compliance; Issues to Be Resolved Interviews with COE PI’s, Early Career Awardees and Mentors Dec 2014; Aug 2015; Annually in August Thereafter Implemented Long-Range Strategic Plan (P2 g) Communication Goals (P2 g) Outreach Goals (P2 g) Compliance with Plan Created by the UTSA Grant Faculty/Staff Review of Project Documents; Interviews with Early Career Awardees and Mentors Spring 2015; Annually in August Thereafter
Evaluation-Guide-and-Sample-Template-Workshop-Handouts-Jan16.docx