CF16 2.75 0.89 240 CF17 2.10 0.30 240 CF18 2.05 0.59 240 Source: Field Data, (2016) From Table 4.25, it can be observed that Variable CF1 had the lowest mean score of 1.65. This variable was an indicator of the social cultural impacts of microfinance on women. This means that a majority of respondents agreed and only a minority disagreed with this variable. As a result it is safe to conclude that a majority of respondents agree that the quality of family life has enhanced with women being able to access microfinance credits. Table 4.26: Communalities Factors Initial Extraction CF1 1.00 0.95 CF2 1.00 0.80 CF3 1.00 0.80 CF4 1.00 0.73 CF5 1.00 0.82 CF6 1.00 0.84 CF7 1.00 0.86 CF8 1.00 0.83 CF9 1.00 0.88 CF10 1.00 0.69 CF11 1.00 0.86 CF12 1.00 0.74 CF13 1.00 0.70 CF14 1.00 0.81 CF15 1.00 0.80 CF16 1.00 0.60 CF17 1.00 0.75 CF18 1.00 0.90 Source: Field Data, (2016) Variable CF15 which is that only a marginal of families have benefited from microfinance institutions, had the highest mean score of 3.20, meaning that a majority of the respondents were neutral or disagreed with it. This variable represented the economic impacts of microfinance on women empowerment. It is
CF16 2.75 0.89 240 CF17 2.10 0.30 240 CF18 2.05 0.59 240 Source: Field Data, (2016) From Table 4.25, it can be observed that Variable CF1 had the lowest mean score of 1.65. This variable was an indicator of the social cultural impacts of microfinance on women. This means that a majority of respondents agreed and only a minority disagreed with this variable. As a result it is safe to conclude that a majority of respondents agree that the quality of family life has enhanced with women being able to access microfinance credits. Table 4.26: Communalities Factors Initial Extraction CF1 CF2 CF3 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.80 CF4 CF5 CF6 CF7 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.82 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.86 CF8 CF9 CF10 1.00 0.83 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.69 CF11 1.00 0.86 CF12 CF13 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.70 CF14 1.00 0.81 CF15 1.00 0.80 CF16 CF17 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.75 CF18 1.00 0.90 Source: Field Data, (2016) Variable CF15 which is that only a marginal of families have benefited from microfinance institutions, had the highest mean score of 3.20, meaning that a majority of the respondents were neutral or disagreed with it. This variable represented the economic impacts of microfinance on women empowerment. It is
Oscar_Mchilo_tyr.docx