This concept would: Avoid declaration by manufacturer (also declaration of device classes) Receiver requirements and tests are related to the TX power and/or OBW RX sensitivity could be related to a minimum distance (min distance is related to e.g. EIRP) Consider Object separation requirement (related to OBW) Interference concept, (majority support): In band (kind is related the use-cases, under discussion) related OWB, e.g. @ f = fc ± OBW, kind of “Adjacent range”: interferer more “real” fixed from boarder (permitted range of operation), “remote” range: e.g. 3GHz below 76GHz and above 77GHz, kind: CW Picture from discussion concept 3: Decision RX-concept: support to develop/revise the document based on this concept. Action for rapporteur: to delete all out of the doc, numbers shall only be used as an “limits” example. Limit evaluation shall take place during the preparation of the related EN (use-cases, wanted performance related) to add radar formula in the doc (as the “background” to update use-case requirements based on contributions and work on SRdoc work editorials, structure of the document: rapporteur will work on the of concept document, “neutral”, insert 3,… Issue: target/echo simulator: TG SRR agreed that this solution is the test procedure for the future “favour” EN Wording to be checked to avoid mix-up with military terminology (Radar Target / Echo simulator) Action for the and to prepare a generic text for document “R&S” “Keysight” More details in related EN/measurement document NWI for ENs? Plans, next steps, possible time schedule Old shopping list Additional: level of confidence for number, see ERMTGSRR(18)035009 Contribution Result:
This concept would: Avoid declaration by manufacturer (also declaration of device classes) Receiver requirements and tests are related to the TX power and/or OBW RX sensitivity could be related to a minimum distance (min distance is related to e.g. EIRP) Consider Object separation requirement (related to OBW) Interference concept, (majority support): In band (kind is related the use-cases, under discussion) “Adjacent range”: related OWB, e.g. @ f = fc ± OBW, kind of interferer more “real” “remote” range: fixed from boarder (permitted range of operation), e.g. 3GHz below 76GHz and above 77GHz, kind: CW Picture from discussion concept 3: Decision RX-concept: support to develop/revise the document based on this concept. Action for rapporteur: to delete all “limits” out of the doc, numbers shall only be used as an example. Limit evaluation shall take place during the preparation of the related EN (use-cases, wanted performance related) to add radar formula in the doc (as the “background” to update use-case requirements based on contributions and work on SRdoc work editorials, structure of the document: rapporteur will work on the document, “neutral”, insert of concept 3,… Issue: target/echo simulator: TG SRR agreed that this solution is the “favour” test procedure for the future EN Wording to be checked to avoid mix-up with military terminology (Radar Target / Echo simulator) Action for the “R&S” and “Keysight” to prepare a generic text for document More details in related EN/measurement document NWI for ENs? Plans, next steps, possible time schedule Old shopping list Additional: level of confidence for number, see ERMTGSRR(18)035009 Contribution Result:
ERMTGSRR(18)035015r1_Meeting_Minutes_TG_SRR_35.docx