Your participation would involve in reading 1 abstract of a systematic review and answering 5 short questions about its findings. As a thank for your participation in the study, you will be entered into a draw along with all other participants for a chance to win an iPad mini. You can complete the survey by clicking here. Or by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser : With best wishes Dr Amelie Yavchitz (INSERM, France) Dr Sally Hopewell (University of Oxford, UK) Pr Philippe Ravaud (Paris Descartes University, INSERM, France) Pr Isabelle Boutron (Paris Descartes University, INSERM, France) The University of Paris Descartes, Institutional Review Board (IORG0000725), has approved this study. Your responses will be kept confidential. If you prefer not to receive future reminders regarding this study, please contact Amelie Yavchitz at amelie.yavchitz@bjn.aphp.fr © 2013 Centre d 'épidémiologie clinique, Paris Survey Based on the information reported in the abstract, please answer the following questions about the intervention. To avoid any biased interpretation, the description and name of the intervention have been masked. Randomized abstract 1) How confident are you in the results of this study? 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 □ □ □ 3 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ « Not confident at all» « very confident» 2) How confident are you in the validity of the conclusions of this study? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ « Not confident at all » « very confident» 3) How confident are you that the intervention could be of benefit to patients? “A” 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ « Not confident at all» « very confident» 4) How confident are you that the results of this study could influence your clinical practice? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ « Not confident at all » « very confident» 5) Do you think that this systematic review was conducted rigorously? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ « not rigorously at all» « yes, very rigorously»
Your participation would involve in reading 1 abstract of a systematic review and answering 5 short questions about its findings. As a thank for your participation in the study, you will be entered into a draw along with all other participants for a chance to win an iPad mini. You can complete the survey by clicking here. Or by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser : With best wishes Dr Amelie Yavchitz (INSERM, France) Dr Sally Hopewell (University of Oxford, UK) Pr Philippe Ravaud (Paris Descartes University, INSERM, France) Pr Isabelle Boutron (Paris Descartes University, INSERM, France) The University of Paris Descartes, Institutional Review Board (IORG0000725), has approved this study. Your responses will be kept confidential. If you prefer not to receive future reminders regarding this study, please contact Amelie Yavchitz at amelie.yavchitz@bjn.aphp.fr © 2013 Centre d 'épidémiologie clinique, Paris Survey Based on the information reported in the abstract, please answer the following questions about the intervention. To avoid any biased interpretation, the description and name of the intervention have been masked. Randomized abstract 1) How confident are you in the results of this study? 0 □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 □ 8 □ 9 □ 10 □ « Not confident at all» « very confident» 2) How confident are you in the validity of the conclusions of this study? 0 □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 □ 8 □ 9 □ 10 □ « Not confident at all » « very confident» 3) How confident are you that the intervention “A” could be of benefit to patients? 0 □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 □ 8 □ 9 □ 10 □ « Not confident at all» « very confident» 4) How confident are you that the results of this study could influence your clinical practice? 0 □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 □ 8 □ 9 □ 10 □ « Not confident at all » « very confident» 5) Do you think that this systematic review was conducted rigorously? 0 □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7 □ 8 □ 9 □ 10 □ « not rigorously at all» « yes, very rigorously»
12874_2014_1130_MOESM1_ESM.docx