Evaluation of Candidate for Full Professor (research and teaching) in XXX The committee should consider the criteria below. The evaluation should be based on the application (cover letter, CV, teaching portfolio, publications submitted at the time of application) relative to the advertised position. Candidates are judged by a balanced evaluation of the criteria. They are divided into three categories: A-criteria are very important. B-criteria are also important, but it is acceptable if some are only partly fulfilled. C-criteria are qualifications and experiences that are not specifically required by a candidate for this type of position. However, these count positively and may to some extent compensate for not fulfilling all A- and B-criteria. 1. Applicant Name, year of birth and nationality Academic exams and degrees (discipline, date and institution) Current position and number of years in the current position 2. Research (peer-reviewed publications) (A) Numerous papers in high-quality journals or other high-quality publication channels. (A) Several papers in the very best publication channels within the research area. (A) Many papers with good citation numbers. (A) Excellent H-index (depending on research area). (A) Independent production after PhD (e.g. demonstrating ability to work in different subareas and with different people). 3. Research (network) (A) Extensive international research collaborations (e.g. joint papers and applications). (A) Programme/organising committees, editorial boards, invited lectures, peer-reviewing, etc. (A) Long-term research stay(s) abroad at another internationally acknowledged university or research institution. (C) PhD-study/employment in a world-class research group.
Evaluation of Candidate for Full Professor (research and teaching) in XXX The committee should consider the criteria below. The evaluation should be based on the application (cover letter, CV, teaching portfolio, publications submitted at the time of application) relative to the advertised position. Candidates are judged by a balanced evaluation of the criteria. They are divided into three categories: A-criteria are very important. B-criteria are also important, but it is acceptable if some are only partly fulfilled. C-criteria are qualifications and experiences that are not specifically required by a candidate for this type of position. However, these count positively and may to some extent compensate for not fulfilling all A- and B-criteria. 1. Applicant Name, year of birth and nationality Academic exams and degrees (discipline, date and institution) Current position and number of years in the current position 2. Research (peer-reviewed publications) (A) Numerous papers in high-quality journals or other high-quality publication channels. (A) Several papers in the very best publication channels within the research area. (A) Many papers with good citation numbers. (A) Excellent H-index (depending on research area). (A) Independent production after PhD (e.g. demonstrating ability to work in different subareas and with different people). 3. Research (network) (A) Extensive international research collaborations (e.g. joint papers and applications). (A) Programme/organising committees, editorial boards, invited lectures, peer-reviewing, etc. (A) Long-term research stay(s) abroad at another internationally acknowledged university or research institution. (C) PhD-study/employment in a world-class research group.
Evaluation_Form_Full_Professor_research_and_teaching.docx