Original PAD Mid Term Review (2015) Revised 2013 No official restructuring, Restructuring (2016) Project Closing but RF change in MTR Project extension Report Indicator of of for as as Date, Mid for for 2017 2017 2013 Change 2016 Change Baseline Closing Review Target 2015 Target 2016 Target 2016 Closing Comments August Term Baseline End End February February June Project Original Achievement Achievement New Revised Indicator Indicator Target exceeded. Indicator eighteen % Because the project provides financial resources to of schools having BGPs and none to COGES, the Midterm Review Dropped COGES quarterly 0 80 decided to monitor BGPs related COGES meetings 0 80% 31% meetings as instead of COGES meetings at school level. documented by the Minutes Indicator nineteen % of BGP having COGES quarterly New No 81% 75% 82% meetings as indicator change documented by the Minutes Indicator twenty Target partially achieved (67%). Annual qualitative surveys undertaken Two annual qualitative surveys were undertaken. (“Bureaux Critically, in of the fact that the original target No No 0 3 0 3 1 1 3 2 in the PAD is 1, this should have been 3 (one survey gestionnaires de change change per year); thus, for the three years of PROSEB, three proximité” no longer collecting surveys were expected to take place. Two surveys fees from the took place; respectively in 2015 and 2016. schools) PDOs-Level Indicators Kasai West – Original PAD Mid Term Review Restructuring (2016) Revised 2013 Project Closing (2015) Project extension
Original PAD Revised 2013 Mid Term Review (2015) No official restructuring, but RF change in MTR Report Restructuring (2016) Project extension Project Closing Indicator Original Baseline End Target for 2016 Baseline 2013 End Target for 2016 Achievement as of June 2015 Mid Term Review Indicator Change Achievement as of August 2016 Indicator Change Revised Target for New Closing Date, February 2017 Project Closing February 2017 Comments Indicator eighteen % of schools having COGES quarterly meetings as documented by the Minutes 0 80 0 80% 31% Dropped Target exceeded. Because the project provides financial resources to BGPs and none to COGES, the Midterm Review decided to monitor BGPs related COGES meetings instead of COGES meetings at school level. Indicator nineteen % of BGP having COGES quarterly meetings as documented by the Minutes New indicator 81% No change 75% 82% Indicator twenty Annual qualitative surveys undertaken (“Bureaux gestionnaires de proximité” no longer collecting fees from the schools) 0 3 0 3 1 No change 1 No change 3 2 Target partially achieved (67%). Two annual qualitative surveys were undertaken. Critically, in of the fact that the original target in the PAD is 1, this should have been 3 (one survey per year); thus, for the three years of PROSEB, three surveys were expected to take place. Two surveys took place; respectively in 2015 and 2016. PDOs-Level Indicators – Kasai West Original PAD Revised 2013 Mid Term Review (2015) Restructuring (2016) Project extension Project Closing
P131120-ICR-SECPO-BOS-09052017.docx