journal article reviews grading rubric 100 Points Criteria Levels of Achievement Advanced 92-100 (A- Proficient 84-91 (B- to Developing 76-83 (C- Below Not Present Points to A): B+) : to C+): Expectations 1-75 Earned Criteria Satisfies criteria w/ Satisfies criteria at the Satisfies most criteria (F to D+): excellence graduate level Does not satisfy criteria Content 65-70 Points 59-64 Points 53-58 Points 0-52 Points 0 points 70%: 70 Points 33-35 points 30-32 points 27-29 points 1-26 points 0 Points 35 points Student meets the Student provides Student includes Student clearly summary of requirements as some of the deviates from salient/main points listed in the requirements in the the that is concisely requirements in “Proficient” “Proficient” column worded but of column but the “Proficient” sufficient length to provides more Student may not column adequately provide extensive clearly distinguish a reasonably complete review of explanation main points from Student may the article (concisely written peripheral or omit many key and without supporting ideas ideas from the Summary includes wordiness) summary all major topics of the article (if the In addition, student Student may article is a research demonstrates full incorrectly study, briefly understanding of describes review key key ideas hypotheses, research supporting the methods, results, main points, elements in an
journal article reviews grading rubric 100 Points Criteria Levels of Achievement Criteria Advanced 92-100 (A- to A): Satisfies criteria w/ excellence Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+) : Satisfies criteria at the graduate level Developing 76-83 (C- to C+): Satisfies most criteria Below Expectations 1-75 (F to D+): Does not satisfy criteria Not Present Points Earned Content 70%: 70 Points 65-70 Points 59-64 Points 53-58 Points 0-52 Points 0 points 35 points 33-35 points Student meets the requirements as listed in the “Proficient” column but provides more extensive explanation (concisely written and without wordiness) In addition, student demonstrates full understanding of key ideas supporting the main points, 30-32 points Student provides summary of salient/main points that is concisely worded but of sufficient length to adequately provide a reasonably complete review of the article Summary includes all major topics of the article (if the article is a research study, briefly describes hypotheses, methods, results, 27-29 points Student includes some of the requirements in the “Proficient” column Student may not clearly distinguish main points from peripheral or supporting ideas 1-26 points Student clearly deviates from the requirements in the “Proficient” column Student may omit many key ideas from the summary Student may incorrectly review key research elements in an 0 Points
Enhanced%20Grading%20Rubric%20for%20Journal%20Article%20Reviews%20Revised%205.20.2018.docx