Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: Engagement with Individual, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities: Establishes contact, builds rapport, forms working relationships, and invites a diverse array of clients, stakeholders, and/or community partners to participate in clinical services and/or administrative projects. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Does not reach out to key Identifies and reaches out to Strategically identifies and stakeholders; ignores or most stakeholders on reaches out to influential passively approaches multiple levels of systems stakeholders on multiple Unable (program, agency, and levels of key systems to assess community) (program, agency, and community) Unable to introduce self, Introduces self, role and Introduces self, role and role and goals to a variety of goals to a variety of goals to a side variety of Unable stakeholders stakeholders in a clear stakeholders in a clear, to assess manner concise, and inviting manner Unable to establish rapport Establishes rapport with Establishes rapport even with with stakeholders; unable to most stakeholders; elicits highly reluctant stakeholders; Unable discover their interests and their interests, agenda, and attunes to their interests and to assess agendas investment agenda; strengthens their investment Unable to achieve an Achieves an acceptable Achieves an exceptional Unable acceptable participation rate participation rate and level participation rate and level of to assess of participation participation Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to engagement? Unable 1 2 3 4 5 to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below):
Please check the box in each row that best matches your observationally-based appraisal of the student: Engagement with Individual, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities: Establishes contact, builds rapport, forms working relationships, and invites a diverse array of clients, stakeholders, and/or community partners to participate in clinical services and/or administrative projects. Improvement Desired Competence Mastery Does not reach out to key stakeholders; ignores or passively approaches Identifies and reaches out to most stakeholders on multiple levels of systems (program, agency, and community) Strategically identifies and reaches out to influential stakeholders on multiple levels of key systems (program, agency, and community) Unable to assess Unable to introduce self, role and goals to a variety of stakeholders Introduces self, role and goals to a variety of stakeholders in a clear manner Introduces self, role and goals to a side variety of stakeholders in a clear, concise, and inviting manner Unable to assess Unable to establish rapport with stakeholders; unable to discover their interests and agendas Establishes rapport with most stakeholders; elicits their interests, agenda, and investment Establishes rapport even with highly reluctant stakeholders; attunes to their interests and agenda; strengthens their investment Unable to assess Unable to achieve an acceptable participation rate Achieves an acceptable participation rate and level of participation Achieves an exceptional participation rate and level of participation Unable to assess Considering the above items and other relevant factors, how would you rate the student’s overall level of competence related to engagement? 1 2 3 4 5 Unable to Assess Not Proficient Competent Exceptional Mastery Assign a number to the nearest .50 increment: Unable to Assess Specific examples of student attainment for this competency (must contain supporting details particularly for scores above 4.0): Specific ways student could enhance or improve competency in this area (most contain supporting details particularly for scores 1.5 or below):
Fall%20Semester%20Progress%20Review%2C%20Second%20Year%20Management%20and%20Planning%20Students%2C%202013-2014.docx