Table 25: Studies included in synthesis Study Intervention Comparator 1 Comparator 2 Comparator 3 reference/ID (add more columns as needed) Example: Smith 1990 x x Smith 1994 x x Table 26: Studies excluded from synthesis Study Reasons for exclusion reference/ID Describe the methods used to synthesise the evidence. Meta-analysis: state methods and models used and justify these. If Bayesian methods are used, justify the priors chosen. [add details here] Indirect or mixed treatment comparisons: state the statistical model, software and whether a fixed or random effects model has been used. Justify the choice of methods. If Bayesian methods are used, justify the priors chosen. The computer code and tables of study data entered into the indirect or mixed treatment comparison (including the outcomes data and numbers of patients in each of the trial arms for each outcome synthesised) should be included in an appendix. Narrative review: give details of the methods used. [add details here] Discuss the extent to which the studies may be considered (1) homogeneous as a group and (2) representative of the target population and treatments.
Table 25: Studies included in synthesis Study reference/ID Intervention Comparator 1 Comparator 2 Comparator 3 (add more columns as needed) Example: Smith 1990 x x Smith 1994 x x Table 26: Studies excluded from synthesis Study reference/ID Reasons for exclusion Describe the methods used to synthesise the evidence. Meta-analysis: state methods and models used and justify these. If Bayesian methods are used, justify the priors chosen. [add details here] Indirect or mixed treatment comparisons: state the statistical model, software and whether a fixed or random effects model has been used. Justify the choice of methods. If Bayesian methods are used, justify the priors chosen. The computer code and tables of study data entered into the indirect or mixed treatment comparison (including the outcomes data and numbers of patients in each of the trial arms for each outcome synthesised) should be included in an appendix. Narrative review: give details of the methods used. [add details here] Discuss the extent to which the studies may be considered (1) homogeneous as a group and (2) representative of the target population and treatments.
EUnetHTA-evidence-submission-template_meddev_long-FINAL3_docxversion.docx