Part A of the order of the High Court is set aside and replaced with the following order: 'The value of the enrichment to the first defendant from the estate of the deceased, Mr Jürgen Eichhorn, to the plaintiff’s impoverishment, is to be determined as at the date of litis contestatio.' 3. The costs of the appeal shall be costs in the cause. ________________________ O’REGAN AJA ________________________ SHIVUTE CJ ________________________ CHOMBA AJA APPEARANCES APPELLANT: A Instructed by Andreas Vaatz & Partners
Part A of the order of the High Court is set aside and replaced with the following order: 'The value of the enrichment to the first defendant from the estate of the deceased, Mr Jürgen Eichhorn, to the plaintiff’s impoverishment, is to be determined as at the date of litis contestatio.' 3. The costs of the appeal shall be costs in the cause. ________________________ O’REGAN AJA ________________________ SHIVUTE CJ ________________________ CHOMBA AJA APPEARANCES APPELLANT: A Instructed by Andreas Vaatz & Partners
Paschke%20v%20Frans%20(SA%2030-2012)%20%5B2015%5D%20NASC%20(30%20April%202015).docx