evergreen thorn and and community policies and legal frameworks to Riverine forest (scrub resource use ensure land use changes do not forests) for (integrating undermine forest conservation biodiversity sustainable forest conservation, management Risks: mitigation of climate principles) -Failure to generate adequate change and securing revenues from SFM might change forest ecosystem government priorities services -Failure to effectively engage local stakeholders (herders, land owners, forest dependents and other stakeholders leads to conflict Total avoided and/or N/A 9,908,090 tCO2.eq Updates on forest cover, Assumptions: sequestrated carbon carbon monitoring -The GOP and Provincial Governments benefits over reports remain committed to sustainable period due to management of forests and land, as improved sustainable well as set-aside of areas conservation. management of -Federal and Provincial institutions forests. develop capacity and skills for monitoring and assessing C benefits -The affects of climate change on forests is unlikely to be significant to undermine forest rehabilitation Risks: -Reduced revenues from reduced timber exploitation and meeting demands of communities for timber and fuelwood might shift government priorities away from sustainable use and conservation. Extent in hectares of 0 67,861 ha Quarterly and Annual Assumption: forest area managed project progress reports, -The Federal and provincial for multiple forest monitoring Governments are committed to sustainable forest reports and independent management of the forest for management and evaluation reports multiple benefits and not just ecosystem benefits timber production Risks:
evergreen thorn and Riverine forest (scrub forests) for biodiversity conservation, mitigation of climate change and securing forest ecosystem services and community resource use (integrating sustainable forest management principles) policies and legal frameworks to ensure land use changes do not undermine forest conservation Risks: -Failure to generate adequate revenues from SFM might change government priorities -Failure to effectively engage local stakeholders (herders, land owners, forest dependents and other stakeholders leads to conflict Total avoided and/or sequestrated carbon benefits over period due to improved sustainable management of forests. N/A 9,908,090 tCO2.eq Updates on forest cover, carbon monitoring reports Assumptions: -The GOP and Provincial Governments remain committed to sustainable management of forests and land, as well as set-aside of areas conservation. -Federal and Provincial institutions develop capacity and skills for monitoring and assessing C benefits -The affects of climate change on forests is unlikely to be significant to undermine forest rehabilitation Risks: -Reduced revenues from reduced timber exploitation and meeting demands of communities for timber and fuelwood might shift government priorities away from sustainable use and conservation. Extent in hectares of forest area managed for multiple sustainable forest management and ecosystem benefits 0 67,861 ha Quarterly and Annual project progress reports, forest monitoring reports and independent evaluation reports Assumption: -The Federal and provincial Governments are committed to management of the forest for multiple benefits and not just timber production Risks:
12-04-15_PIMS_4674_Pakistan_SFM_ProDOC_3_Dec_2015_AAA.docx