to timing. recruited into OGT test study. Overall, 79% of participants had original HbA1c ≥5.7% so considered high-risk. N=3476 participants, 51% male, age under 60 years 35%, age 60 years or older 65%. Alqahtani () Level III-2 Low risk of N=1,814 records of Database review so the only inclusion IFG: ≥6.5% IFG: FPG 3x3 table Khamis bias in study patients who had criteria were having the test results 6.4% ≥7.0 Database FPG Mushayt, undergone concurrent available and ‘suspicion of diabetes’, design. review of mmol/L; Saudi Arabia OGT, FPG and but this not described. participants who Some 2hPG IGT: HbA1c testing on visited concerns ≥11.1 2hPG suspicion of diabetes. outpatient clinic about mmol/L N=622 males of armed forces applicability (34.3%), mean age hospital and had given very 54.3 ± 13.6 years. tests on specific suspicion of population; diabetes. unlikely to be relevant to Australia. Baral () Risk of bias N=920 subjects Pregnant women excluded. No other Not FPG FPG Level III-2 ≥6.0% 2x3 table Dharan, unclear referred to hospital for details. reported mmol/L; ≥7.0 Hospital-based Nepal overall. OGT testing. Age 2hPG study of patients Reference range 30–65 years. 11.1 mmol/L referred for 2hPG standard No other details. OGT testing. ≥11.1 differ from Australia, very little information about study design. Some concerns about applicability,
to timing. recruited into OGT test study. Overall, 79% of participants had original HbA1c ≥5.7% so considered high-risk. N=3476 participants, 51% male, age under 60 years 35%, age 60 years or older 65%. Alqahtani () Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia Level III-2 Database review of participants who visited outpatient clinic of armed forces hospital and had tests on suspicion of diabetes. Low risk of bias in study design. Some concerns about applicability given very specific population; unlikely to be relevant to Australia. N=1,814 records of patients who had undergone concurrent OGT, FPG and HbA1c testing on suspicion of diabetes. N=622 males (34.3%), mean age 54.3 ± 13.6 years. Database review so the only inclusion criteria were having the test results available and ‘suspicion of diabetes’, but this not described. IFG: ≥6.5% IFG: FPG mmol/L; IGT: 2hPG mmol/L FPG ≥7.0 2hPG ≥11.1 3x3 table Baral () Dharan, Nepal Level III-2 Hospital-based study of patients referred for OGT testing. Risk of bias unclear overall. Reference standard differ from Australia, very little information about study design. Some concerns about applicability, N=920 subjects referred to hospital for OGT testing. Age range 30–65 years. No other details. Pregnant women excluded. No other details. Not reported ≥6.0% FPG mmol/L; 2hPG mmol/L FPG ≥7.0 2hPG ≥11.1 2x3 table 11.1 6.4%
1267-FinalContractedAssessmentReport-accessible.DOCX