expectations of Stakeholder perceptions on the quality and Interviews with program community value of the co-design process and stakeholders stakeholders? implementation of activities Most significant change stories Extent to program activities appropriately consider the needs of different stakeholder group Perceptions of program stakeholders on the activities that were most useful in helping to address the problem 3. Does the Program budget and list of all program costs Program budgets and financial program represent and funding expenditure expenditure reports value for money? List of resources, materials and funds Project pilot learning provided to the program on a pro-bono or documentation and how this is used low-bono basis in design documentation Strategies used to maximise efficiencies and Interviews with participants and missed opportunities program staff Investment in learning and implementation Information drawn from question 1 of learnings for program improvement related to outcomes and their sustainability Outcomes and sustainability of outcomes 4. What lessons can Stakeholder perceptions on what did and did Program documentation outlining be learned and not work well and what could have been lessons learned during pilot phases recommendations improved and throughout implementation made to strengthen Factors underpinning success Interviews with program and replicate the participants and staff challenges encountered by the program program? team and how they were addressed Independent analysis based on findings in relation to questions 1-3 Evidence drawn from other evaluation questions Document Review The desktop review entailed an analysis of program documentation related to the program from the period February 2016 to December 2017 provided by the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Other data such as newspaper articles and social media articles written by project participants. Included documents were coded thematically according to the key evaluation questions. Recurring themes from the data were then identified within each of the key evaluation questions and drawn together in a summary of findings. The following documents were included in the desktop analysis: Author Title Source Date Premier Pilot LGBTI Equality Program documentation 2/12/2016 Department of Roadshow pilot reflection and Cabinet Premier LGBTI Equality Roadshow 1.0 Program documentation: 26/10/2017 Department of Framework and Outcomes and Engagement and Cabinet – Framework Titled ‘Attachment A’ Premier LGBTI Equality Roadshow 2.0 Program documentation for 23/8/2017 Department of Framework and Policy Phase 2 framework and Cabinet – Direction Premier Project Concept Note January Program design 4/2016 Department of – 2016 documentation and Cabinet Premier Charter Rural and Regional Program Charter 20/5/16 Department of Roadshow and Cabinet Premier Program planning parameters, 31/5/16 Department of Roadshow Planning Charter frameworks, protocols and Cabinet
expectations of community stakeholders? Stakeholder perceptions on the quality and value of the co-design process and implementation of activities Extent to program activities appropriately consider the needs of different stakeholder group Perceptions of program stakeholders on the activities that were most useful in helping to address the problem Interviews with program stakeholders Most significant change stories 3. Does the program represent value for money? Program budget and list of all program costs and funding expenditure List of resources, materials and funds provided to the program on a pro-bono or low-bono basis Strategies used to maximise efficiencies and missed opportunities Investment in learning and implementation of learnings for program improvement Outcomes and sustainability of outcomes Program budgets and financial expenditure reports Project pilot learning documentation and how this is used in design documentation Interviews with participants and program staff Information drawn from question 1 related to outcomes and their sustainability 4. What lessons can be learned and recommendations made to strengthen and replicate the program? Stakeholder perceptions on what did and did not work well and what could have been improved Factors underpinning success challenges encountered by the program team and how they were addressed Evidence drawn from other evaluation questions Program documentation outlining lessons learned during pilot phases and throughout implementation Interviews with program participants and staff Independent analysis based on findings in relation to questions 1-3 Document Review The desktop review entailed an analysis of program documentation related to the program from the period February 2016 to December 2017 provided by the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Other data such as newspaper articles and social media articles written by project participants. Included documents were coded thematically according to the key evaluation questions. Recurring themes from the data were then identified within each of the key evaluation questions and drawn together in a summary of findings. The following documents were included in the desktop analysis: Author Title Source Date Department of Premier and Cabinet Pilot LGBTI Equality Roadshow pilot reflection Program documentation 2/12/2016 Department of Premier and Cabinet LGBTI Equality Roadshow 1.0 – Framework and Outcomes Titled ‘Attachment A’ Program documentation: and Engagement Framework 26/10/2017 Department of Premier and Cabinet LGBTI Equality Roadshow 2.0 – Framework and Policy Direction Program documentation for Phase 2 framework 23/8/2017 Department of Premier and Cabinet Project Concept Note – January 2016 Program design documentation 4/2016 Department of Premier and Cabinet Charter Rural and Regional Roadshow Program Charter 20/5/16 Department of Premier and Cabinet Roadshow Planning Charter Program planning parameters, frameworks, protocols 31/5/16
Equality_Roadshow_Evaluation_Report_V2_31.7.18.docx