and were able to reconstruct recognisable corresponding movements by a robot arm scenes and moving objects. were hidden.The monkeys were later In the 1980s, Apostolos shown the robot directly and learned to Georgopoulos at Johns Hopkins University control it by viewing its movements. The found a mathematical relationship between BCI used velocity predictions to control the (based on a function). He also found reaching movements and simultaneously that dispersed groups of neurons in predicted hand gripping force. different areas of the brain collectively Other labs that develop BCIs and controlled motor commands but was only algorithms that decode neuron signals able to record the firings of neurons in one include from Brown University, Andrew area at a time because of technical Schwartz from the University of Pittsburgh limitations imposed by his equipment. and Richard Andersen from Caltech. There has been rapid development These researchers were able to produce in BCIs since the mid-1990s. Several working BCIs even though they recorded groups have been able to capture complex signals from far fewer neurons than brain motor centre signals using recordings Nicolelis (15–30 neurons versus 50–200 from (groups of neurons) and use these to neurons). control external devices, including Donoghue's group reported training research groups led by Richard Andersen, , rhesus monkeys to use a BCI to track Phillip Kennedy, , and Andrew Schwartz. visual targets on a computer screen with or without assistance of a joystick Diagram of the BCI developed by BCI). Schwartzss's group created a BCI for three-dimensional tracking in Miguel Nicolelis and collegues for use on Rhesus monkeys virtual reality and also reproduced BCI Later experiments by Nicolelis control in a robotic arm. using rhesus monkeys, succeeded in and reproduced monkey reaching and grasping CONCLUSION: movements in a robot arm. With their The idea of moving robots or deeply cleft and furrowed brains, rhesus prosthetic devices not by manual control, monkeys are considered to be better but by the brain mere “thinking” (i.e., models for human than owl monkeys. The activity of human subjects) has been a monkeys were trained to reach and grasp fascinated approach. Medical cures are objects on a computer screen by unavailable for many forms of neural and manipulating a joystick while muscular paralysis. The enormity of the
and were able to reconstruct recognisable scenes and moving objects. In the 1980s, Apostolos Georgopoulos at Johns Hopkins University found a mathematical relationship between the (based on a function). He also found that dispersed groups of neurons in different areas of the brain collectively controlled motor commands but was only able to record the firings of neurons in one area at a time because of technical limitations imposed by his equipment. There has been rapid development in BCIs since the mid-1990s. Several groups have been able to capture complex brain motor centre signals using recordings from (groups of neurons) and use these to control external devices, including research groups led by Richard Andersen, , Phillip Kennedy, , and Andrew Schwartz. Diagram of the BCI developed by Miguel Nicolelis and collegues for use on Rhesus monkeys Later experiments by Nicolelis using rhesus monkeys, succeeded in and reproduced monkey reaching and grasping movements in a robot arm. With their deeply cleft and furrowed brains, rhesus monkeys are considered to be better models for human than owl monkeys. The monkeys were trained to reach and grasp objects on a computer screen by manipulating a joystick while corresponding movements by a robot arm were hidden.The monkeys were later shown the robot directly and learned to control it by viewing its movements. The BCI used velocity predictions to control reaching movements and simultaneously predicted hand gripping force. Other labs that develop BCIs and algorithms that decode neuron signals include from Brown University, Andrew Schwartz from the University of Pittsburgh and Richard Andersen from Caltech. These researchers were able to produce working BCIs even though they recorded signals from far fewer neurons than Nicolelis (15–30 neurons versus 50–200 neurons). Donoghue's group reported training rhesus monkeys to use a BCI to track visual targets on a computer screen with or without assistance of a joystick BCI). Schwartzss's group created a BCI for three-dimensional tracking in virtual reality and also reproduced BCI control in a robotic arm. CONCLUSION: The idea of moving robots or prosthetic devices not by manual control, but by mere “thinking” (i.e., the brain activity of human subjects) has been a fascinated approach. Medical cures are unavailable for many forms of neural and muscular paralysis. The enormity of the
125103119-BRAIN-GATE-TECHNOLOGY.docx