INSTITUTION/DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE’S NAME CLASSIFICATION TITLE EVALUATION PERIOD EVALUATION DATE FROM TO Annual Review Probationary: 3 month 6 month 10 month Unscheduled PERFORMANCE FACTORS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS: COMMENTS AND/OR EXAMPLES (ATTACH EXTRA SHEETS IF NEEDED) RATING QUALITY OF WORK EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS COMPETENCE, ACCURACY, NEATNESS, THOROUGHNESS. MEETS EXPECTATIONS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT* UNSATISFACTORY * QUANTITY OF WORK EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS USE OF TIME, VOLUME OF WORK ACCOMPLISHED, ABILITY TO MEET MEETS EXPECTATIONS SCHEDULES, PRODUCTIVITY LEVELS. NEEDS IMPROVEMENT* UNSATISFACTORY * JOB KNOWLEDGE EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS DEGREE OF TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING OF JOB MEETS EXPECTATIONS PROCEDURES AND METHODS. NEEDS IMPROVEMENT* UNSATISFACTORY * WORKING RELATIONSHIPS EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS COOPERATION AND ABILITY TO WORK WITH SUPERVISOR, CO-WORKERS, EXPECTATIONS STUDENTS, AND CLIENTS SERVED. NEEDS IMPROVEMENT* UNSATISFACTORY * ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS (As appropriate) EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS TRAINING AND DIRECTING MEETS EXPECTATIONS HOURLY/UNCLASSIFIED WORKERS, DELEGATION, PLANNING AND IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZING WORK, PROBLEM SOLVING, DECISION MAKING ABILITY, UNSATISFACTORY * ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE. DEFINITIONS OF PERFORMANCE RATING CATEGORIES EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS The employee regularly beyond a majority of the performance factors and has made many significant contributions to the efficiency and success of this organization. – MEETS EXPECTATIONS The employee has met the performance factors and has contributed to the efficiency and success of this organization. – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT The employee has failed to meet one or more of the significant performance factors. A plan for improvement must be completed. – * UNSATISFACTORY The employee has failed to meet the performance factors. A plan for improvement must be completed. – * Give specific examples of this employee’s performance.
INSTITUTION/DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE’S NAME CLASSIFICATION TITLE EVALUATION PERIOD FROM TO EVALUATION DATE Annual Review Probationary: 3 month 6 month 10 month Unscheduled PERFORMANCE FACTORS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS: COMMENTS AND/OR EXAMPLES (ATTACH EXTRA SHEETS IF NEEDED) RATING QUALITY OF WORK COMPETENCE, ACCURACY, NEATNESS, THOROUGHNESS. EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS MEETS EXPECTATIONS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT* UNSATISFACTORY * QUANTITY OF WORK USE OF TIME, VOLUME OF WORK ACCOMPLISHED, ABILITY TO MEET SCHEDULES, PRODUCTIVITY LEVELS. EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS MEETS EXPECTATIONS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT* UNSATISFACTORY * JOB KNOWLEDGE DEGREE OF TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING OF JOB PROCEDURES AND METHODS. EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS MEETS EXPECTATIONS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT* UNSATISFACTORY * WORKING RELATIONSHIPS COOPERATION AND ABILITY TO WORK WITH SUPERVISOR, CO-WORKERS, STUDENTS, AND CLIENTS SERVED. EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT* UNSATISFACTORY * ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS (As appropriate) TRAINING AND DIRECTING HOURLY/UNCLASSIFIED WORKERS, DELEGATION, PLANNING AND ORGANIZING WORK, PROBLEM SOLVING, DECISION MAKING ABILITY, ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE. EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS MEETS EXPECTATIONS IMPROVEMENT UNSATISFACTORY * DEFINITIONS OF PERFORMANCE RATING CATEGORIES EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS – The employee regularly beyond a majority of the performance factors and has made many significant contributions to the efficiency and success of this organization. MEETS EXPECTATIONS – The employee has met the performance factors and has contributed to the efficiency and success of this organization. NEEDS IMPROVEMENT – The employee has failed to meet one or more of the significant performance factors. A plan for improvement must be completed. UNSATISFACTORY * – The employee has failed to meet the performance factors. A plan for improvement must be completed. * Give specific examples of this employee’s performance.
PCC-CFT-Performance-Evaluation-form.docx