recordkeeping. Thus, PG&E is directed to file and serve a report on all known parties, which responds to the following directives: List each factual contention stated, and conclusion reached, by the SED Incident Investigation Reports, regarding PG&E’s recordkeeping, that PG&E contends is incorrect, and provide support for PG&E’s position. What explanation does PG&E offer for each recordkeeping failure claimed in the SED incident investigation reports? What corrective actions has PG&E already in response to the recordkeeping failures identified in the SED incident investigation reports? Provide the names (and titles if employee or agent) of all witnesses to the responses and information in the PG&E report. Provide the name of each such witness with respect to specified portions of the PG&E report. The purpose of PG&E’s report, as directed by the Commission, was to obtain reasons of law and fact known to PG&E to support the possibility that “all the company has committed no violation of law with respect to its gas distribution recordkeeping.” SED does not explain how the fact that A Forms were missing for the DeAnza Division from 1979 to 1991 falls within the Commission’s directive. We note as well that SED did obtain sufficient information from PG&E to illuminate the issue of the missing A Forms well in advance of the due date for SED’s testimony. Accordingly, SED has not shown a clear violation of the Commission’s directive to PG&E and SED, in fact, received the information regarding the missing A forms in sufficient time to prepare the issue for litigation. Therefore, we conclude that no additional penalties for
recordkeeping. Thus, PG&E is directed to file and serve a report on all known parties, which responds to the following directives: List each factual contention stated, and conclusion reached, by the SED Incident Investigation Reports, regarding PG&E’s recordkeeping, that PG&E contends is incorrect, and provide support for PG&E’s position. What explanation does PG&E offer for each recordkeeping failure claimed in the SED incident investigation reports? What corrective actions has PG&E already in response to the recordkeeping failures identified in the SED incident investigation reports? Provide the names (and titles if employee or agent) of all witnesses to the responses and information in the PG&E report. Provide the name of each such witness with respect to specified portions of the PG&E report. The purpose of PG&E’s report, as directed by the Commission, was to obtain “all reasons of law and fact known to PG&E to support the possibility that the company has committed no violation of law with respect to its gas distribution recordkeeping.” SED does not explain how the fact that A Forms were missing for the DeAnza Division from 1979 to 1991 falls within the Commission’s directive. We note as well that SED did obtain sufficient information from PG&E to illuminate the issue of the missing A Forms well in advance of the due date for SED’s testimony. Accordingly, SED has not shown a clear violation of the Commission’s directive to PG&E and SED, in fact, received the information regarding the missing A forms in sufficient time to prepare the issue for litigation. Therefore, we conclude that no additional penalties for
166208431.docx