SWG RFC Resolution Categories Accepts Tracking Number: RFC 013-B05 Accepts with Modifications Evaluator Submission Requirement Section Criticality Accepts as Future Work Document Type Number Rejects with Reasons Gregory Peele, Jr. / X RFC submission is a comment or question with no call Applied Research for Candidate Standard modification Associates, Inc. 101 5.6.2.3.1 Volume 1 Minor RFC Comment as submitted by Evaluator OGC CDB SWG Response / Comment / Modifications / Reasons There is no NODATA value for Jpeg2000. The VSTI imagery has to Is any provision for representing NODATA pixels where the VSTI imagery content is absent, unknown, or have some data there. redacted? Or is the expectation that the terrain producer will fill these pixels with geotypical data or a desired Marking areas as geospecific vs something else would be future work sentinel color? Some users in the geo-intelligence domain using metadata to describe the characteristics of the CDB. only wish to see and use data if it is known to be present and geospecific. Greg’s email response: (Informational) Just curious. I assume the answer is no. Something to consider for next version. SWG RFC Resolution Categories
SWG RFC Resolution Categories Accepts Accepts with Modifications Accepts as Future Work Rejects with Reasons X RFC submission is a comment or question with no call for Candidate Standard modification Tracking Number: RFC 013-B05 Evaluator Submission Document Requirement Type Section Number Criticality Gregory Peele, Jr. / Applied Research Associates, Inc. Volume 1 101 5.6.2.3.1 Minor RFC Comment as submitted by Evaluator OGC CDB SWG Response / Comment / Modifications / Reasons Is any provision for representing NODATA pixels where the VSTI imagery content is absent, unknown, or redacted? Or is the expectation that the terrain producer will fill these pixels with geotypical data or a desired sentinel color? Some users in the geo-intelligence domain only wish to see and use data if it is known to be present and geospecific. There is no NODATA value for Jpeg2000. The VSTI imagery has to have some data there. Marking areas as geospecific vs something else would be future work using metadata to describe the characteristics of the CDB. Greg’s email response: (Informational) Just curious. I assume the answer is no. Something to consider for next version. SWG RFC Resolution Categories
16-112_OGC_CDB_V1_0_2016_RFC_Resolution_Document_as_approved_in_Dublin_SWG_meeting.docx