20 4 References of present and prior school food service contracts in the State of Alaska. 15 5 Nutritional marketing, communication plan, and menu planning option. 15 6 Employee training and development plan. 10 7 Purchasing specification and purchasing power. 10 8 Support for preparation areas and safe food. 5 9 FSMC's (Contractor’s) accounting and reporting system. 5 10 FSMC's (Contractor’s) proposed on-site supervisor. 200 Total Points Ancillary materials includes development of scoring sheets, composite scoring – forms, and any other forms or letters that may be needed. The scoring sheets should contain the evaluation criteria, standards to be applied, scoring columns, and room for comments. The individuals who will be evaluating the proposals should have sufficient knowledge of the goals of the LEA, experience in school food service or congregate feeding, financial management experience (of food service, if possible), and experience in evaluating proposals. POST-SELECTION REVIEW Competing contractors be notified in writing of the selection of the apparent successful contractor and afterwards, shall be given seven (7) calendar days to review the RFP file and evaluation report at the LEA office. Any questions or concerns about the selection process must be in writing and must be delivered to: , and The LEA will promptly respond to contractor questions or concerns. The decisions of the LEA are final. The LEA will provide a 30 calendar day Appeal. III. REQUIRED MATERIALS CONSTITUTING A RESPONSIVE PROPOSAL MANDATORY ITEMS ITEMS 1–14 ARE TO BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL PROPOSALS. PROPOSALS NOT CONTAINING ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS WILL BE REJECTED.
20 4 References of present and prior school food service contracts in the State of Alaska. 15 5 Nutritional marketing, communication plan, and menu planning option. 15 6 Employee training and development plan. 10 7 Purchasing specification and purchasing power. 10 8 Support for preparation areas and safe food. 5 9 FSMC's (Contractor’s) accounting and reporting system. 5 10 FSMC's (Contractor’s) proposed on-site supervisor. 200 Total Points Ancillary materials – includes development of scoring sheets, composite scoring forms, and any other forms or letters that may be needed. The scoring sheets should contain the evaluation criteria, standards to be applied, scoring columns, and room for comments. The individuals who will be evaluating the proposals should have sufficient knowledge of the goals of the LEA, experience in school food service or congregate feeding, financial management experience (of food service, if possible), and experience in evaluating proposals. POST-SELECTION REVIEW Competing contractors be notified in writing of the selection of the apparent successful contractor and afterwards, shall be given seven (7) calendar days to review the RFP file and evaluation report at the LEA office. Any questions or concerns about the selection process must be in writing and must be delivered to: , and The LEA will promptly respond to contractor questions or concerns. The decisions of the LEA are final. The LEA will provide a 30 calendar day Appeal. III. REQUIRED MATERIALS CONSTITUTING A RESPONSIVE PROPOSAL MANDATORY ITEMS ITEMS 1–14 ARE TO BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL PROPOSALS. PROPOSALS NOT CONTAINING ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS WILL BE REJECTED.
NSLP_FSMC_RFP_Template.docx