AIDC application (ground-ground coordination) 2 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 22 – Agree; editorial. The same comment(s) to UM246 3 – 2. UM96: Suggest removing either the word Closed or from the message intent: 3 - [Editors 21 March]: a) b) to be “present” “current” – discussed with the group. It could be a to continue to fly on the current vertical instead of route. “Instruction present heading” 3 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 22 – 3. UM284 DESCEND OUT OF March]: Agree with AW. Delete CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: UM284, modify UM236 to accommodate parameter for none, a) Does this message element belong in descending, and climbing. But, keep A5-5? Maybe A5-2 would be more message in Table 5-5. appropriate? 4 Open – b) Suggest that the message element text be revised, to match the voice phraseology:- e.g. 4 - [Editors 21 March]: To be – discussed in the group. Rationale to LEAVE CONTROL AIRSPACE keep AT was: A procedure DESCENDING (named_instruction) has to be started at the position which is the first Maybe UM236 could even be adapted to: position in the procedure. LEAVE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE 4 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 22 – [new_variable], where [new_variable] is a March]: Agree with the Editors. choice of NONE, DESCENDING or 5 – CLIMBING. Closed 5 - [Editors 21 March]: To be – discussed with the group
AIDC application (ground-ground coordination) The same comment(s) to UM246 2. UM96: Suggest removing either the word “present” or “current” from the message intent: “Instruction to continue to fly on the current present heading” 3. UM284 DESCEND OUT OF CONTROLLED AIRSPACE: a) Does this message element belong in A5-5? Maybe A5-2 would be more appropriate? b) Suggest that the message element text be revised, to match the voice phraseology:- e.g. LEAVE CONTROL AIRSPACE DESCENDING Maybe UM236 could even be adapted to: LEAVE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE [new_variable], where [new_variable] is a choice of NONE, DESCENDING or CLIMBING. 2 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 22 Agree; editorial. 3 - [Editors – 21 March]: a) b) to be discussed with the group. It could be a vertical instead of route. 3 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 22 March]: Agree with AW. Delete UM284, modify UM236 to accommodate parameter for none, descending, and climbing. But, keep message in Table 5-5. 4 - [Editors – 21 March]: To be discussed in the group. Rationale to keep AT was: A procedure (named_instruction) has to be started at the position which is the first position in the procedure. 4 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 22 March]: Agree with the Editors. 5 - [Editors – 21 March]: To be discussed with the group 3 – Closed 4 – Open 5 – Closed
OPLINKPWGWHL-4-APR.docx