smoothing kernel, 2.3 feature selection thresholded, no low-pass filter, and four test-trials per iteration were subsequently used in the analysis of the validation set. – Supplementary Figure 3: Confusion matrices displaying precision-values yielded by the classification analysis of the optimization dataset with the final set of parameters. Because no permutation statistics were calculated for the optimization set, significance was calculated using a one-sample independent against chance-level classification (i.e. 0.333) for each t-test cell in the diagonal of the confusion matrices. Here, all use a degrees of freedom of t-statistics 12 (i.e. 13 subjects - 1) and are evaluated against a significance level of 0.05, For the diagonal of the self-analysis confusion matrix, all values were significantly above chance-level, all < 0.0001. For the diagonal of the cross-analysis confusion matrix, p both the action (43% correct) and situation (44% correct) classes scored significantly above chance, = 0.014 and = 0.0007 respectively. Interoception was classified at chance level, p p p = 0.99, which stands in contrast with the results in the validation-set.
smoothing kernel, 2.3 feature selection thresholded, no low-pass filter, and four test-trials per iteration – were subsequently used in the analysis of the validation set. Supplementary Figure 3: Confusion matrices displaying precision-values yielded by the classification analysis of the optimization dataset with the final set of parameters. Because no permutation statistics were calculated for the optimization set, significance was calculated using a one-sample independent t-test against chance-level classification (i.e. 0.333) for each cell in the diagonal of the confusion matrices. Here, all t-statistics use a degrees of freedom of 12 (i.e. 13 subjects - 1) and are evaluated against a significance level of 0.05, For the diagonal of the self-analysis confusion matrix, all values were significantly above chance-level, all p < 0.0001. For the diagonal of the cross-analysis confusion matrix, both the action (43% correct) and situation (44% correct) classes scored significantly above chance, p = 0.014 and p = 0.0007 respectively. Interoception was classified at chance level, p = 0.99, which stands in contrast with the results in the validation-set.
nsx037_Supp.docx