INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION: DISTRICT(S)/SCHOOL(S): PROJECT COORDINATOR: PROJECT COORDINATOR’S POSITION: PHONE: EMAIL: Criteria for Needs Assessment/Problem Identification 10 points for full submission/underlined sections used to score abbreviated submission requirements Provided a detailed description and (4-5 pts) (2-3 pts) (0-1 pts) in-depth analysis and correlation of Student achievement data in math/science Student achievement data in math and/or Limited student achievement data in math and/or the participating for targeted grades is disaggregated and science is included and disaggregated for science is included for the targeted grades. Data analyzed in the narrative. School/district the targeted grades. Data analysis is limited is presented but no analysis OR only superficial needs based on valid and reliable Comprehensive/PD have been OR only one source of data is analyzed OR of the data is presented OR data ‘reading’ data analyzed. Information related to only loosely correlated to project presented is not current or reliable (i.e., only teacher/administrator goals/strategies. anecdotal reports from a small subset of quality/experience/training is presented students/teachers/districts is presented). clearly. ALL data is analyzed and tightly correlated to project goals/strategies. Referenced multiple and varied (2 pts) (1 pt) (0 pts) sources of relevant and current data Multiple/varied relevant sources of State assessment data or another single assessment data is presented but little to no qualitative and quantitative—are source of relevant data is the only source of analysis of the data is included OR no specific presented/referenced (e.g., ACT, AP, drop data presented and analyzed. data is presented OR only anecdotal data is out rate, retention rates, number of students presented and analyzed OR only data presented taking advanced classes, successful post- is more than 2 years old.
INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION: DISTRICT(S)/SCHOOL(S): PROJECT COORDINATOR: PROJECT COORDINATOR’S POSITION: PHONE: EMAIL: Criteria for Needs Assessment/Problem Identification 10 points for full submission/underlined sections used to score abbreviated submission requirements Provided a detailed description and in-depth analysis and correlation of the participating needs based on valid and reliable data (4-5 pts) Student achievement data in math/science for targeted grades is disaggregated and analyzed in the narrative. School/district Comprehensive/PD have been analyzed. Information related to teacher/administrator quality/experience/training is presented clearly. ALL data is analyzed and tightly correlated to project goals/strategies. (2-3 pts) Student achievement data in math and/or science is included and disaggregated for the targeted grades. Data analysis is limited OR only one source of data is analyzed OR only loosely correlated to project goals/strategies. (0-1 pts) Limited student achievement data in math and/or science is included for the targeted grades. Data is presented but no analysis OR only superficial ‘reading’ of the data is presented OR data presented is not current or reliable (i.e., only anecdotal reports from a small subset of students/teachers/districts is presented). Referenced multiple and varied sources of relevant and current data (2 pts) Multiple/varied relevant sources of qualitative and quantitative—are presented/referenced (e.g., ACT, AP, drop out rate, retention rates, number of students taking advanced classes, successful (1 pt) State assessment data or another single source of relevant data is the only source of data presented and analyzed. (0 pts) assessment data is presented but little to no analysis of the data is included OR no specific data is presented OR only anecdotal data is presented and analyzed OR only data presented is more than 2 years old. post-
MSP%20FY%2015%20RFA.docx