TABLE 1 Correlations, Means, and Standard Deviations Among Narcissism Scores and Supervisor Ratings Variable M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1. Narcissism 24.57 6.28 .78 2. Participative management 4.01 0.67 .87 –.199* 3. Team building 4.09 0.70 .764** .81 –.223** 4. Confrontation effectiveness 3.90 0.63 .711** .765** .86 –.189* 5. Sensitivity 4.21 0.61 .660** .762** .783** .80 –.187* 6. Integrity 4.31 0.49 .636** .671** .718** .684** .72 –.211** 7. Analysis 4.00 0.58 .585** .518** .681** .522** .688** .82 –.065 8. Judgment and decision making 4.09 0.52 .601** .563** .708** .620** .703** .793** .82 –.124 9. Planning and organizing 3.94 0.69 .502** .449** .520** .428** .678** .695** .641** .86 –.091 10. Initiative 4.12 0.61 .554** .495** .600** .433** .685** .690** .618** .680** .74 –.111 Coeffecient alphas are reported on the diagonal. N = 148–154. Note. *p < .05, two-tailed. **p < .01, two-tailed.
TABLE 1 Correlations, Means, and Standard Deviations Among Narcissism Scores and Supervisor Ratings Variable M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1. Narcissism 24.57 6.28 .78 2. Participative management 4.01 0.67 –.199* .87 3. Team building 4.09 0.70 –.223** .764** .81 4. Confrontation effectiveness 3.90 0.63 –.189* .711** .765** .86 5. Sensitivity 4.21 0.61 –.187* .660** .762** .783** .80 6. Integrity 4.31 0.49 –.211** .636** .671** .718** .684** .72 7. Analysis 4.00 0.58 –.065 .585** .518** .681** .522** .688** .82 8. Judgment and decision making 4.09 0.52 –.124 .601** .563** .708** .620** .703** .793** .82 9. Planning and organizing 3.94 0.69 –.091 .502** .449** .520** .428** .678** .695** .641** .86 10. Initiative 4.12 0.61 –.111 .554** .495** .600** .433** .685** .690** .618** .680** .74 Note. Coeffecient alphas are reported on the diagonal. N = 148–154. *p < .05, two-tailed. **p < .01, two-tailed.
Narcissism%20in%20Organizations-%20A%20multisource%20Appraisal%20Reflects%20Different%20Perspectives-1%20%281%29.docx