established in the perspective of awareness by a full-fledged opponent for the proof of that [that is, for the proof that the self and the aggregates are not truly established, the lack of being truly established one and many] proves only the terminology and convention of the absence of true establishment in the probandum of the proof of that [that is, in the proof that the self and the aggregates are not truly established]. It follows [that although the meaning of the absence of true establishment has already been established in the perspective of awareness by a full-fledged opponent for the proof of that, that is, for the proof that the self and the aggregates are not truly established, the lack of being truly established one and many proves only the terminology and convention of the absence of true establishment in the probandum of the proof of that, that is, in the proof that the self and the aggregates are not truly established] because although at that time the meaning of the absence of true establishment has been ascertained from the sign, the association of terminology [that is, conceptual consciousness (rtog pa)] thinking with regard to the probandum are not truly established” “These and of the verbal convention are not truly established” is “[These] meaningful,
established in the perspective of awareness by a full-fledged opponent for the proof of that [that is, for the proof that the self and the aggregates are not truly established, the lack of being truly established one and many] proves only the terminology and convention of the absence of true establishment in the probandum of the proof of that [that is, in the proof that the self and the aggregates are not truly established]. It follows [that although the meaning of the absence of true establishment has already been established in the perspective of awareness by a full-fledged opponent for the proof of that, that is, for the proof that the self and the aggregates are not truly established, the lack of being truly established one and many proves only the terminology and convention of the absence of true establishment in the probandum of the proof of that, that is, in the proof that the self and the aggregates are not truly established] because although at that time the meaning of the absence of true establishment has been ascertained from the sign, the association of terminology [that is, conceptual consciousness (rtog pa)] thinking with regard to the probandum “These are not truly established” and of the verbal convention “[These] are not truly established” is meaningful,
opposite_of_emptiness_SEPT2014.docx