དེས་ན་སྒྱུ་མ་རྟ་གླང་དུ་སྣང་ཡང་ནས། [དེས་སྟོང་པ་བཞིན་དུ། །དེ་ལྟ་ན་ཆོས་དེ་ཡིན་པ་མི་སྲིད་པར་འགྱུར་ཞིང། །ཞེས་གསུངས་སོ། ། Parts-possessors are to be associated only 16. Moreover, someone says: with the physical. Parts-possessors are to be associated only with And several say: compounded phenomena. are not logically feasible because it must be treated Our response: that there is nothing among all [phenomena]—the compounded such as forms and so forth and the uncompounded such as space, nirvāṇa, and so forth that are not necessarily part-possessors. It follows [that it must be treated that there is nothing among all (phenomena)—the compounded such as forms and so forth and the uncompounded such as space, nirvāṇa, and so forth that are not necessarily part-possessors] because doing it that way is the thought of the father Shāntarakṣhita and the son [Kamalashīla] and of the Supramundane Victor, ཡང་ཁ་ཅིག
དེས་ན་སྒྱུ་མ་རྟ་གླང་དུ་སྣང་ཡང་ནས། [དེས་སྟོང་པ་བཞིན་དུ། །དེ་ལྟ་ན་ཆོས་དེ་ཡིན་པ་མི་སྲིད་པར་འགྱུར་ཞིང། །ཞེས་གསུངས་སོ། ། 16. Moreover, someone says: Parts-possessors are to be associated only with the physical. And several say: Parts-possessors are to be associated only with compounded phenomena. Our response: are not logically feasible because it must be treated that there is nothing among all [phenomena]—the compounded such as forms and so forth and the uncompounded such as space, nirvāṇa, and so forth that are not necessarily part-possessors. It follows [that it must be treated that there is nothing among all (phenomena)—the compounded such as forms and so forth and the uncompounded such as space, nirvāṇa, and so forth that are not necessarily part-possessors] because doing it that way is the thought of the father Shāntarakṣhita and the son [Kamalashīla] and of the Supramundane Victor, ཡང་ཁ་ཅིག
opposite_of_emptiness_SEPT2014.docx