the name of God and profit” “In Document 7: Source: Islamic court decision, Ankara, seventeenth century but representative of Turkish guild practices in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries Complaint One trader is buying all the cotton and preventing others from buying the cotton Grouping: Anti-Commerce Pro-Merchant Religion as a Attitudes Attitudes Regulating in the Market Document 1: Document 2: Document 4: Easier for a camel Honest merchants What God wants than a rich man are like martyrs of when it comes to the faith trade the Golden – Document 3: Rule Successful Document 6: merchant gave it God and profits Document 7: all up for God The guild went to the Islamic court Document 5: to ensure one man Commerce is did not buy all of trickery (Change the cotton over time in
“In the name of God and profit” Document 7: Source: Islamic court decision, Ankara, seventeenth century but representative of Turkish guild practices in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries Complaint One trader is buying all the cotton and preventing others from buying the cotton Grouping: Anti-Commerce Attitudes Pro-Merchant Attitudes Religion as a Regulating in the Market Document 1: Easier for a camel than a rich man Document 3: Successful merchant gave it all up for God Document 5: Commerce is trickery (Change over time in Document 2: Honest merchants are like martyrs of the faith Document 6: God and profits Document 4: What God wants when it comes to trade – the Golden Rule Document 7: The guild went to the Islamic court to ensure one man did not buy all of the cotton
Notes%20Trade%20Christianity%20and%20Islam%20DBQ.docx