Trade drafts with two of your peers (anyone in the class) and ask for feedback like the “is information I provided clear, relevant, and helpful? Could it help the FDA make decisions fair and balanced policies regarding inclusion of and labeling regarding nanoparticles in personal care products? 5. Self-Check Your Work Against the Rubric I’ll be using the same rubric to grade your WebQuest, so I highly recommend you check your work along the way. 6. Turn in Your Final Policy Recommendation Copy your document into the Project” folder on the G-Drive. Make sure all group “Nano member’s names appear on the title page of your document. WebQuest Evaluation Rubric This is the rubric; no mystery here. The project is worth 60 points, so I suggest you refer to this frequently while working so you don't leave anything out. If you want me to check if you met a requirement before you turn in your final draft just ask. :-) Exceeds Standards Met Standards Below Standards (90-100%) (70-89%) (0-69%) Posted at least once Posted at least twice Did not post at all during the week about during the week about how the research was how the research was how the research was going and/or your Collaboration going; submitted your going; submitted you research summary was (5 points) own research own research turned in more than summary no more summary on time. one day late. than one day late. Report was missing Report was missing Report covered all key more than one of the one of the following points: definition of following key points: key points: definition nanoparticles, their definition of General Content of nanoparticles, their common uses, nanoparticles, their (30 points) common uses, pros/cons, and common uses, pros/cons, and recommendations on pros/cons, and recommendations on responsible labeling. recommendations on responsible labeling. responsible labeling. The report was The report was The report lacked a organized in a logical organized in a logical logical sequence and it sequence, but it was sequence. It was easy was difficult or Logic and Clarity difficult to see your to see your supporting impossible to see the (10 points) supporting evidence evidence for all of the evidence that for the recommendations supported your recommendations made. recommendations. made.
Trade drafts with two of your peers (anyone in the class) and ask for feedback like “is the information I provided clear, relevant, and helpful? Could it help the FDA make decisions fair and balanced policies regarding inclusion of and labeling regarding nanoparticles in personal care products? 5. Self-Check Your Work Against the Rubric I’ll be using the same rubric to grade your WebQuest, so I highly recommend you check your work along the way. 6. Turn in Your Final Policy Recommendation Copy your document into the “Nano Project” folder on the G-Drive. Make sure all group member’s names appear on the title page of your document. WebQuest Evaluation Rubric This is the rubric; no mystery here. The project is worth 60 points, so I suggest you refer to this frequently while working so you don't leave anything out. If you want me to check if you met a requirement before you turn in your final draft just ask. :-) Exceeds Standards (90-100%) Met Standards (70-89%) Below Standards (0-69%) Collaboration (5 points) Posted at least twice during the week about how the research was going; submitted you own research summary on time. Posted at least once during the week about how the research was going; submitted your own research summary no more than one day late. Did not post at all how the research was going and/or your research summary was turned in more than one day late. General Content (30 points) Report covered all key points: definition of nanoparticles, their common uses, pros/cons, and recommendations on responsible labeling. Report was missing one of the following key points: definition of nanoparticles, their common uses, pros/cons, and recommendations on responsible labeling. Report was missing more than one of the following key points: definition of nanoparticles, their common uses, pros/cons, and recommendations on responsible labeling. Logic and Clarity (10 points) The report was organized in a logical sequence. It was easy to see your supporting evidence for all of the recommendations made. The report was organized in a logical sequence, but it was difficult to see your supporting evidence for the recommendations made. The report lacked a logical sequence and it was difficult or impossible to see the evidence that supported your recommendations.
Nanoparticles%20Webquest.docx