Finland WPS considered holistically, Revision includes greater Identifies need for CS and research institutions Conducted or ‘twinning’ including climate change, focus on monitoring and more long-term are members of formal engagement with health and education as reporting research on monitoring Kenya/ Afghanistan to 2008-11, relevant elements of WPS Annual progress report to effectiveness Group that has regular exchange lessons learned 2012-16 agenda parliament Implementation of meetings several times/year and experiences about their Lesson learned from 1st ambitious targets lags respective NAPs NAP: the need for collection, behind evaluation and distribution of Coordination between lessons learned bilateral actions and Conducted case studies Finnish efforts at the from Kenya, Nepal and multilateral level is North- East India as part of required Study’ of 1st Coherence between ‘Implementation NAP the stated objectives and financial resources is a challenge. Iceland Revision is linked to the Revised document identifies No lessons identified in CS were consulted in the document’ provisions ‘Living Strategy for Iceland’s measures for accountability revision draft, no mention of on-going allow for adjustments and international development and monitoring engagement revision on ongoing basis 2008, co-operation (adopted in Revision standardises Provides estimation of 2013-16 2013) reporting across four annual cost of thematic pillars implementation of the NAP Four main objectives identified, which are partnered with expected outcomes, activities, and indicators
Finland 2008-11, 2012-16 WPS considered holistically, including climate change, health and education as relevant elements of WPS agenda Revision includes greater focus on monitoring and reporting Annual progress report to parliament Lesson learned from 1st NAP: the need for collection, evaluation and distribution of lessons learned Conducted case studies from Kenya, Nepal and North- East India as part of ‘Implementation Study’ of 1st NAP Identifies need for more long-term research on effectiveness Implementation of ambitious targets lags behind Coordination between bilateral actions and Finnish efforts at the multilateral level is required Coherence between the stated objectives and financial resources is a challenge. CS and research institutions are members of monitoring Group that has regular meetings several times/year Conducted ‘twinning’ or formal engagement with Kenya/ Afghanistan to exchange lessons learned and experiences about their respective NAPs Iceland 2008, 2013-16 Revision is linked to the Strategy for Iceland’s international development co-operation (adopted in 2013) Revised document identifies measures for accountability and monitoring Revision standardises reporting across four thematic pillars Four main objectives identified, which are partnered with expected outcomes, activities, and indicators No lessons identified in revision CS were consulted in the draft, no mention of on-going engagement ‘Living document’ provisions allow for adjustments and revision on ongoing basis Provides estimation of annual cost of implementation of the NAP
nap-interim-review-report.docx