Demonstration that latency and jitter performance meets the requirements of typical applications (e.g. video conferencing, telephony). The total buffering delay (latency plus jitter margin) is expected to be significantly less than 100ms as is considered acceptable for real time voice and video communication. Supporting For example business A business case that demonstrates that revenue versus cost of the proposed network provides a positive return on investment for case different take-up scenarios; and See Appendix G Business Case. – [The example Appendix G is highly simplified: the supplier shall include all necessary complexity while maintaining clarity. The supplier shall provide a business case sensitivity analysis considering different take-up scenarios. In its assessment, the NCC assessment will consider both the reasonableness of the take-up scenarios themselves as well as the related business case sensitivity results.] Evidence of sufficient funding availability (including an assumption of any government subsidy where appropriate) to build the network as planned. Evidence of funding is included in Appendix G. [The supplier shall include actual evidence of funding] Planning For example: consents Sample planning consents or applications; and/or The proposed network requires a significant number of new radio masts. As all are in national park areas, they cannot be built under the new notification-based General Permitted Development Order process. As a result planning applications are expected to be needed for all new sites.
Demonstration that latency and jitter performance meets the requirements of typical applications (e.g. video conferencing, telephony). The total buffering delay (latency plus jitter margin) is expected to be significantly less than 100ms as is considered acceptable for real time voice and video communication. Supporting business case For example A business case that demonstrates that revenue versus cost of the proposed network provides a positive return on investment for different take-up scenarios; and See Appendix G – Business Case. [The example Appendix G is highly simplified: the supplier shall include all necessary complexity while maintaining clarity. The supplier shall provide a business case sensitivity analysis considering different take-up scenarios. In its assessment, the NCC assessment will consider both the reasonableness of the take-up scenarios themselves as well as the related business case sensitivity results.] Evidence of sufficient funding availability (including an assumption of any government subsidy where appropriate) to build the network as planned. Evidence of funding is included in Appendix G. [The supplier shall include actual evidence of funding] Planning consents For example: Sample planning consents or applications; and/or The proposed network requires a significant number of new radio masts. As all are in national park areas, they cannot be built under the new notification-based General Permitted Development Order process. As a result planning applications are expected to be needed for all new sites.
NGA_Assessment_Worked_Example_v2.docx