Medley of Free Speech cases: 5. a. Lawyerdude's free speech page: b. Clear and Present Danger Test explained: c. I talked about this 1941 Bridges case in my 1999 winning argument to the jury in my free speech case. Bridges case about the clear and present danger test is at this link d. That winning argument is here: Look on page 9 for the Bridges case. e. "Fuck the draft" case: f. Bridges is on Findlaw is: g. My "tell em how to make the bomb page: h. Pentagon papers case: i. This clear and present danger test was used in brief #3789: j. Overbreadth case: Shuttlesworth. My overbreadth page: k. List of overbreadth cases pertaining to lawyers and other humans. l. Fred Shuttleworth's most famous Supreme Ct. case (he had 4): m. Link's to Fred's other 3 cases: i. (1969) ii. (1963) iii. (1958) n. Related un-named concept in Yick Wo case: o. explained: Unlawful Prior Restraint p. The clear and present danger test is on the top ten list of liberating constitutional concepts: q. Near v Minnesota page: r. Here is an explanation of prior restraint: Top ten liberating constitutional concepts: s. Top 100 liberating decisions of the supreme court. t. Brief 3789 explaining the speech rights of lawyers. u. of authorities for brief 3789: v. History of bar oppression against me: 6. Medley of regarding the Amish, Jehovah’s witnesses and other honest folks fighting for freedom. Amish don't have to pay social security tax. See this link. Amish don't have to send their kids to high school. God Bless the Amish! See Wisconsin v Yoder at this following link: Here is my link to special rights won by Amish, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and other good honest folks: My other Jehovah’s Witness page: Crass Promotional Links: Crass Promotional Links: Upgraded Friday, April 21, 2006 Telephone Lawyerdude: 541 476 8954. Email: This subdocument is Click it to get the latest version.
5. Medley of Free Speech cases: a. Lawyerdude's free speech page: b. Clear and Present Danger Test explained: c. I talked about this 1941 Bridges case in my 1999 winning argument to the jury in my free speech case. Bridges case about the clear and present danger test is at this link d. That winning argument is here: Look on page 9 for the Bridges case. e. "Fuck the draft" case: f. Bridges is on Findlaw is: g. My "tell em how to make the bomb page: h. Pentagon papers case: i. This clear and present danger test was used in brief #3789: j. Overbreadth case: Shuttlesworth. My overbreadth page: k. List of overbreadth cases pertaining to lawyers and other humans. l. Fred Shuttleworth's most famous Supreme Ct. case (he had 4): m. Link's to Fred's other 3 cases: i. (1969) ii. (1963) iii. (1958) n. Related un-named concept in Yick Wo case: o. Unlawful Prior Restraint explained: p. The clear and present danger test is on the top ten list of liberating constitutional concepts: q. Near v Minnesota page: r. Here is an explanation of prior restraint: Top ten liberating constitutional concepts: s. Top 100 liberating decisions of the supreme court. t. Brief 3789 explaining the speech rights of lawyers. u. of authorities for brief 3789: v. History of bar oppression against me: 6. Medley of regarding the Amish, Jehovah’s witnesses and other honest folks fighting for freedom. Amish don't have to pay social security tax. See this link. Amish don't have to send their kids to high school. God Bless the Amish! See Wisconsin v Yoder at this following link: Here is my link to special rights won by Amish, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and other good honest folks: My other Jehovah’s Witness page: Crass Promotional Links: Crass Promotional Links: Upgraded Friday, April 21, 2006 Telephone Lawyerdude: 541 476 8954. Email: This subdocument is Click it to get the latest version.
Motion%20Writing%20101.docx