qualitative than quantitative. The IOUs should work with Energy Division and interested parties to develop the format of the report. This process may include a workshop or working group. We direct the Spring 2017 Pilot Report for PG&E to be due earlier in light of its pending Phase II GRC application; we also direct PG&E to serve its 2017 Matinee Pricing Pilot Report to the service list of A.1606013. In the event that SB 919 is signed into law, the Matinee Pricing Pilot Reports should include data on pilot participation by customers targeted by SB 919 (facilities that create or augment local water supplies). In any we find that the measurement and evaluation of these pilots will be qualitative in nature and primarily use surveys and focus groups to develop findings. The IOUs should explore if ex post statistical matching can be used to develop quantitative estimates of the increase in energy usage during off-peak periods caused by the rate design. However, if this matching cannot be achieved, then qualitative measurement is acceptable. Final interval data for the pilot customers (for the time they are on the pilot as well as the 12 months prior) should be provided to the Energy Division at the conclusion of the measurement and evaluation process. While enrollee specific information should be provided to the Commission under §583, summary information should be included in the annual reports described above and served to the service list to this Rulemaking. Steps for Pilot Approval Of the three IOUs, PG&E provided the most detail regarding the procedure for approval of the matinee pricing tariffs. Although all three IOUs are concerned about the lead time required to finish design and implementation of the matinee pricing tariffs, PG&E recommended specific ways to expedite the
qualitative than quantitative. The IOUs should work with Energy Division and interested parties to develop the format of the report. This process may include a workshop or working group. We direct the Spring 2017 Pilot Report for PG&E to be due earlier in light of its pending Phase II GRC application; we also direct PG&E to serve its 2017 Matinee Pricing Pilot Report to the service list of A.1606013. In the event that SB 919 is signed into law, the Matinee Pricing Pilot Reports should include data on pilot participation by customers targeted by SB 919 (facilities that create or augment local water supplies). In any we find that the measurement and evaluation of these pilots will be qualitative in nature and primarily use surveys and focus groups to develop findings. The IOUs should explore if ex post statistical matching can be used to develop quantitative estimates of the increase in energy usage during off-peak periods caused by the rate design. However, if this matching cannot be achieved, then qualitative measurement is acceptable. Final interval data for the pilot customers (for the time they are on the pilot as well as the 12 months prior) should be provided to the Energy Division at the conclusion of the measurement and evaluation process. While enrollee specific information should be provided to the Commission under §583, summary information should be included in the annual reports described above and served to the service list to this Rulemaking. Steps for Pilot Approval Of the three IOUs, PG&E provided the most detail regarding the procedure for approval of the matinee pricing tariffs. Although all three IOUs are concerned about the lead time required to finish design and implementation of the matinee pricing tariffs, PG&E recommended specific ways to expedite the
166993963.docx