The Government will evaluate each of the offeror’s proposals to determine if the support services offerings satisfy the specific requirements each task. The evaluations will be based on the evaluation factors defined in this section. Evaluation Methodology and Basis for Award SUGGESTED EVALUATION LANGUAGE (Agency may remove or modify the narratives below) The Government may a contract based on the initial proposal without discussions or negotiations with offerors, in accordance with Therefore, it is important that each FAR 52.215-1. proposal be fully compliant, without exception to any requirement, clause or provision. Offerors should submit initial proposals which respond most favorably to the SOW’s requirements. The Government intends to evaluate offerors proposals in accordance with Section 8.0 of this SOW and make a contract award to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the U.S. Government. The Technical Proposal will be evaluated by a technical evaluation committee using the technical criteria shown below. Price has not been assigned a numerical weight. Offerors are reminded that the Government is not obligated to award a negotiated contract on the basis of lowest proposed price, or to the offeror with the highest technical evaluation score. Agencies must state the following when using tradeoff process: solicitation shall state whether all evaluation factors other than cost or ‘The price, when combined, are significantly more important than, approximately equal to, or significantly less important than cost or price.’ As technical scores converge, price may become a deciding factor in the award. Therefore, after the final evaluation of proposals, the contracting officer will make the award to the offeror whose proposal offers the best value to the Government considering both technical and price factors. Evaluation Approach Trade Off or LPTA – Note: The Agency is required to select either Trade off or LPTA Approach. Once a method has been selected, delete all information in this SOW relevant to the method that was NOT selected. SUGGESTED EVALUATION LANGUAGE IF TRADE OFF APPROACH IS SELECTED BY THE AGENCY (Agency may remove or modify the narratives below) The Government anticipates awarding a task order to the offeror whose quote represents the best value, price and other factors considered.
The Government will evaluate each of the offeror’s proposals to determine if the support services offerings satisfy the specific requirements each task. The evaluations will be based on the evaluation factors defined in this section. Evaluation Methodology and Basis for Award SUGGESTED EVALUATION LANGUAGE (Agency may remove or modify the narratives below) The Government may a contract based on the initial proposal without discussions or negotiations with offerors, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. Therefore, it is important that each proposal be fully compliant, without exception to any requirement, clause or provision. Offerors should submit initial proposals which respond most favorably to the SOW’s requirements. The Government intends to evaluate offerors proposals in accordance with Section 8.0 of this SOW and make a contract award to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the U.S. Government. The Technical Proposal will be evaluated by a technical evaluation committee using the technical criteria shown below. Price has not been assigned a numerical weight. Offerors are reminded that the Government is not obligated to award a negotiated contract on the basis of lowest proposed price, or to the offeror with the highest technical evaluation score. Agencies must state the following when using tradeoff process: ‘The solicitation shall state whether all evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than, approximately equal to, or significantly less important than cost or price.’ As technical scores converge, price may become a deciding factor in the award. Therefore, after the final evaluation of proposals, the contracting officer will make the award to the offeror whose proposal offers the best value to the Government considering both technical and price factors. Evaluation Approach – Trade Off or LPTA Note: The Agency is required to select either Trade off or LPTA Approach. Once a method has been selected, delete all information in this SOW relevant to the method that was NOT selected. SUGGESTED EVALUATION LANGUAGE IF TRADE OFF APPROACH IS SELECTED BY THE AGENCY (Agency may remove or modify the narratives below) The Government anticipates awarding a task order to the offeror whose quote represents the best value, price and other factors considered.
Network_OAM_for_Voice_SOW_Template.docx