People did not generally People understood the meaning People understood the meaning People understood the meaning Consumer understanding understand the meaning of the of the assessments and their of the assessments and their of the assessments and their and management of CVD assessments and their CVD risk, CVD risk (i.e. result) but were CVD risk (i.e. result), and were CVD risk (i.e. result), and were risk or how to manage risks where not confident in how to manage confident in how to manage confident in how to manage elevated. risks where elevated. risks where elevated. risks where elevated, and had taken active steps to do so. There has been no impact on Providers have improved Providers have improved their Providers have significantly Improved processes and providers’ processes and processes and systems for CVD processes and systems for CVD improved their processes and systems systems for CVD risk risk assessment, and for the risk assessment, and for the systems for CVD risk assessment, nor for the ongoing ongoing treatment and ongoing treatment and assessment, and for the ongoing treatment and management of management of patients with an management of patients with an treatment and management of patients with an elevated risk. elevated risk, but further elevated risk. patients with an elevated risk. improvements are needed. Economic KEQ 3: What have been the economic implications of the Checks health target and is it likely the programme provides good value for money? Criteria Poor Almost adequate Adequate Excellent Some evidence of wastage of Minimal evidence of wastage of No evidence of wastage of Proactively sought efficiencies in Efficiency funding. Compliance/ funding. Compliance/ funding. Compliance/ implementation. Compliance/ administration costs associated administration costs associated administration costs associated administration costs associated
Consumer understanding and management of CVD risk People did not generally understand the meaning of the assessments and their CVD risk, or how to manage risks where elevated. People understood the meaning of the assessments and their CVD risk (i.e. result) but were not confident in how to manage risks where elevated. People understood the meaning of the assessments and their CVD risk (i.e. result), and were confident in how to manage risks where elevated. People understood the meaning of the assessments and their CVD risk (i.e. result), and were confident in how to manage risks where elevated, and had taken active steps to do so. Improved processes and systems There has been no impact on providers’ processes and systems for CVD risk assessment, nor for the ongoing treatment and management of patients with an elevated risk. Providers have improved processes and systems for CVD risk assessment, and for the ongoing treatment and management of patients with an elevated risk, but further improvements are needed. Providers have improved their processes and systems for CVD risk assessment, and for the ongoing treatment and management of patients with an elevated risk. Providers have significantly improved their processes and systems for CVD risk assessment, and for the ongoing treatment and management of patients with an elevated risk. Economic KEQ 3: What have been the economic implications of the Checks health target and is it likely the programme provides good value for money? Criteria Poor Almost adequate Adequate Excellent Efficiency Some evidence of wastage of funding. Compliance/ administration costs associated Minimal evidence of wastage of funding. Compliance/ administration costs associated No evidence of wastage of funding. Compliance/ administration costs associated Proactively sought efficiencies in implementation. Compliance/ administration costs associated
more-hearts-diabetes-checks-evaluation-aug16.docx