3. AECA was an active party D.16-03-030, pp. 3-6, and Agricultural to the Agricultural and and Pumping Rate Group Rate Design Pumping Rate Group Rate Settlement Agreement, p. 1. Design Settlement Agreement. Settling Party represents Agricultural and Pumping Rate Group “Each customers who are directly Rate Design Settlement Agreement p.2. affected by and have an interest in the outcome of the A&P rate design issues in this proceeding.” AECA’s participation in the D.16-03-030, pp. 30-31; Marginal Cost Settlement Agreement and Revenue Allocation Agreement contributed to an overall rate p.10; and Agricultural and Pumping decrease for the agricultural Rate Group Rate Design Settlement class (-0.7%) compared to Agreement, Appendix B. proposed 6.2% increase. (See 1.a and f above, raised by AECA testimony.) AECA’s participation in the D.16-03-030, p.32, and Agricultural and Settlement Agreement resulted Pumping Rate Group Rate Design in modification of SCE’s Rule Settlement Agreement, p.A-7. 1 definition of Agricultural Power Service to include fluid milk producers. (See 1.e above, in AECA testimony.) AECA’s participation in the D.16-03-030, pp. 33-36, and Settlement Agreement Agricultural and Pumping Rate contributed to revisions to the Rate Design Settlement Agreement, pp. time-related demand charges, A-10 A-12 and A-13. – super off-peak schedule, and time-of-use charges, compared to those proposed by SCE. (See 1.c above, raised by AECA testimony.) AECA’s participation in the Settlement Agreement resulted in a out” of the PA-ICE “phase program. (See 1.d above, raised by AECA testimony.)
3. AECA was an active party to the Agricultural and Pumping Rate Group Rate Design Settlement Agreement. “Each Settling Party represents customers who are directly affected by and have an interest in the outcome of the A&P rate design issues in this proceeding.” AECA’s participation in the Settlement Agreement contributed to an overall rate decrease for the agricultural class (-0.7%) compared to proposed 6.2% increase. (See 1.a and f above, raised by AECA testimony.) AECA’s participation in the Settlement Agreement resulted in modification of SCE’s Rule 1 definition of Agricultural Power Service to include fluid milk producers. (See 1.e above, in AECA testimony.) AECA’s participation in the Settlement Agreement contributed to revisions to the time-related demand charges, super off-peak schedule, and time-of-use charges, compared to those proposed by SCE. (See 1.c above, raised by AECA testimony.) AECA’s participation in the Settlement Agreement resulted in a “phase out” of the PA-ICE program. (See 1.d above, raised by AECA testimony.) D.16-03-030, pp. 3-6, and Agricultural and Pumping Rate Group Rate Design Settlement Agreement, p. 1. Agricultural and Pumping Rate Group Rate Design Settlement Agreement p.2. D.16-03-030, pp. 30-31; Marginal Cost and Revenue Allocation Agreement p.10; and Agricultural and Pumping Rate Group Rate Design Settlement Agreement, Appendix B. D.16-03-030, p.32, and Agricultural and Pumping Rate Group Rate Design Settlement Agreement, p.A-7. D.16-03-030, pp. 33-36, and Agricultural and Pumping Rate Rate Design Settlement Agreement, pp. A-10 – A-12 and A-13.
166269823.docx