2- [Editors 21 March]: Request sent – to the Downstream ATSU. (not to the CDA) 2- [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 22 – March]: Agree with the Editors. A5-22 10 JC R Agreed Closed Comment: [CSG Webex 14 March]: – As per WG78 discussions, DM113R, DM76R, with the suggested change DM114, DM102, DM104R, DM105, DM106R and DM109R are reponses to report requests. It is applicable to every “Notification” They are not notifications. (e.g. DM78R) Suggested Change: [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 22 – Update Message Intents by replacing Agreed with the suggested change, with indicating…” recommend double-checking its “Notification…” “Report applicability to all messages. DM113R Intent shall be updated according to SPR Intent. added as – comment 26 A5-22 11 JC Comment: R [CSG Webex 14 March]: Disagreed Open – As per WG78 discussions, DM79 is not a with the suggested change and notification. Proposed indicating…” “Report Suggested Change: [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 22 – Update Message Intents by replacing March]: Agree with CSG above and with proposed change (“Report “Notification…” “Confirmation…” indicating…”). Need to determine how this applies to emergency messages (that are notifications).
2- [Editors – 21 March]: Request sent to the Downstream ATSU. (not to the CDA) 2- [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 22 March]: Agree with the Editors. A5-22 10 JC Comment: As per WG78 discussions, DM113R, DM76R, DM114, DM102, DM104R, DM105, DM106R and DM109R are reponses to report requests. They are not notifications. Suggested Change: Update Message Intents by replacing “Notification…” with “Report indicating…” R [CSG Webex – 14 March]: Agreed with the suggested change It is applicable to every “Notification” (e.g. DM78R) [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 22 Agreed with the suggested change, recommend double-checking its applicability to all messages. DM113R Intent shall be updated according to SPR Intent. – added as comment 26 Closed A5-22 11 JC Comment: As per WG78 discussions, DM79 is not a notification. Suggested Change: Update Message Intents by replacing “Notification…” with “Confirmation…” R [CSG Webex – 14 March]: Disagreed with the suggested change and Proposed “Report indicating…” [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 22 March]: Agree with CSG above and proposed change (“Report indicating…”). Need to determine how this applies to emergency messages (that are notifications). Open
OPLINKPWGWHL-4-APR.docx