Percentage of cash transfer/voucher Percentage of targeted households that receive distributed in correct timeline, to correct the cash grant or voucher recipient, correct amount, and/or safely monetary value of cash/voucher beneficiary Recipient household’s ability to access receives cash/voucher Beneficiaries who do not use the full amount of Community satisfaction towards the the transfer targeting system; Beneficiary understanding of programme, targeting criteria, distribution process, and Community satisfaction towards the CFM selection process of CfW programme Incidents of adults carers taking from Beneficiary satisfaction towards the children in their care; number of children whose chosen modality compared to in-kind cash has been stolen aid; Beneficiary satisfaction towards the payment and distribution process; Beneficiary perception on their safety during the CTP The specific requirements per type of transfer and delivery mechanism are summarised in tables below. It presents factors that can influence the speed, cost, and thus efficiency of CTP, which can also be monitored over the course of the programme. Figure 15: process monitoring and issues Source: CaLP’s Monitoring4CTP Onsite monitoring Onsite monitoring is an important step during the distribution process, whether it's a distribution of physical (cash, cards), accessing cash from an ATM, bank or post office etc., or accessing cash through technology, i.e. mobile phones. The purpose is to check that the beneficiaries receive what they are supposed to, that they can access the cash or vouchers safely, and that there are no issues nor delays. The most common data collection tools for this type of monitoring are observation using checklists and short surveys with beneficiaries at distribution points. Post monitoring distribution Post monitoring distribution is conducted within a reasonable amount of time after the cash or vouchers have been distributed so that beneficiaries still have relatively accurate recall of the process. The
Percentage of cash transfer/voucher distributed in correct timeline, to correct recipient, correct amount, and/or safely Recipient household’s ability to access cash/voucher Community satisfaction towards the targeting system; Community satisfaction towards the selection process of CfW programme Beneficiary satisfaction towards the chosen modality compared to in-kind aid; Beneficiary satisfaction towards the payment and distribution process; Beneficiary perception on their safety during the CTP Percentage of targeted households that receive the cash grant or voucher monetary value of cash/voucher beneficiary receives Beneficiaries who do not use the full amount of the transfer Beneficiary understanding of programme, targeting criteria, distribution process, and CFM Incidents of adults carers taking from children in their care; number of children whose cash has been stolen The specific requirements per type of transfer and delivery mechanism are summarised in tables below. It presents factors that can influence the speed, cost, and thus efficiency of CTP, which can also be monitored over the course of the programme. Figure 15: process monitoring and issues Source: CaLP’s Monitoring4CTP Onsite monitoring Onsite monitoring is an important step during the distribution process, whether it's a distribution of physical (cash, cards), accessing cash from an ATM, bank or post office etc., or accessing cash through technology, i.e. mobile phones. The purpose is to check that the beneficiaries receive what they are supposed to, that they can access the cash or vouchers safely, and that there are no issues nor delays. The most common data collection tools for this type of monitoring are observation using checklists and short surveys with beneficiaries at distribution points. Post monitoring distribution Post monitoring distribution is conducted within a reasonable amount of time after the cash or vouchers have been distributed so that beneficiaries still have relatively accurate recall of the process. The
170930-draft-ecwg-manual.docx