Ireland Mid-Term progress report on Monitoring group meets four Mid-term progress Monitoring group is 50% CS Findings of independent mid- 1st NAP called for fewer and times a year and is report observed limited Six members of the term progress report 2011-14, broader commitments in independently chaired knowledge Consultative Group that published (not common) 2015-18 Ireland’s second NAP Revision strengthens the implementing actors advised and informed NAP recognised as a living monitoring and evaluation about work of NAP development of revised NAP document Indicators are more colleagues and were from CS, including recommended regular diaspora organisations Includes some actions aimed meetings outside of the Outreach to diaspora at building an evidence base Monitoring Group communities is a core action on the impact of NAP Mid-Term Progress in the NAP implementation Report highlights Irish Defence Forces challenges in adopted its own implementation implementation plan Italy Identifies current economic Unlike 1st NAP, government No mention of The inter-Ministerial Working Connection between crisis as an emerging issue will submit report at the end allocated funding to Group commits to more empowerment and 2010-13, Focuses on integrated of first year of revised NAP implement the NAP inclusive dialogue with combating violence against 2014-16 approach, including identifying the areas that NGOs and participation of women to be a focus of recognition of economic need to be strengthened, CS Italy’s UNSC term 2017/18 issues especially following Revision widens the scope of consultations with both civil action of stakeholders in society and the Parliament response to expansion of agenda (UNSCR 2106 and 2122)
Ireland 2011-14, 2015-18 Mid-Term progress report on 1st NAP called for fewer and broader commitments in Ireland’s second NAP Monitoring group meets four times a year and is independently chaired Revision strengthens the monitoring and evaluation Indicators are more Includes some actions aimed at building an evidence base on the impact of NAP implementation Irish Defence Forces adopted its own implementation plan Mid-term progress report observed limited knowledge implementing actors about work of NAP colleagues and recommended regular meetings outside of the Monitoring Group Mid-Term Progress Report highlights challenges in implementation Monitoring group is 50% CS Six members of the Consultative Group that advised and informed development of revised NAP were from CS, including diaspora organisations Outreach to diaspora communities is a core action in the NAP Findings of independent mid- term progress report published (not common) NAP recognised as a living document Italy 2010-13, 2014-16 Identifies current economic crisis as an emerging issue Focuses on integrated approach, including recognition of economic issues Revision widens the scope of action of stakeholders in response to expansion of agenda (UNSCR 2106 and 2122) Unlike 1st NAP, government will submit report at the end of first year of revised NAP identifying the areas that need to be strengthened, especially following consultations with both civil society and the Parliament No mention of allocated funding to implement the NAP The inter-Ministerial Working Group commits to more inclusive dialogue with NGOs and participation of CS Connection between empowerment and combating violence against women to be a focus of Italy’s UNSC term 2017/18
nap-interim-review-report.docx