the scope of this revision of the National Capital arrangements, however this is outside the scope Plan. of the current process. Still considers it an NCA responsibility to monitor and evaluate the effective implementation of the National Capital Plan in line with its stated goal of protecting the national interest in the planning, development and heritage of the National Capital. Recommends that the National Capital Plan include a section under Governance spelling out the requirement and mechanism for an ongoing transparent process of monitoring and evaluation to ensure effective implementation of its provisions. Figure 112 in the Amendment shows Yarralumla Bay The NCA has previously supported the idea of a as a node’ and that 'development is to be master plan or similar for the Lake and its ‘development foreshore Such a framework could recognise limited to small scale items that help recreation and areas of heritage and conservation value, identify tourism…’. suitable nodes for development, and ensure that Given existing provisions relating to Yarralumla Bay as an lakeside development is appropriate to the aquatic recreation hub, and current challenges to these location. provisions, what confidence can the public have that the proposed scale’ development referred to will not Through the Consultation Report in response to ‘small turn out to be scale’ development in conflict with the Exposure Draft of the Plan, the NCA advised ‘large the aquatic recreation focus? that review of Precinct Codes will commence once the new format and structure of the Plan is in place has. The Burley Griffin and ‘Lake Foreshores Precinct Code’ will form an early stage of Precinct Code review. The NCA considers this process the most appropriate to address concerns
the scope of this revision of the National Capital Plan. Still considers it an NCA responsibility to monitor and evaluate the effective implementation of the National Capital Plan in line with its stated goal of protecting the national interest in the planning, development and heritage of the National Capital. Recommends that the National Capital Plan include a section under Governance spelling out the requirement and mechanism for an ongoing transparent process of monitoring and evaluation to ensure effective implementation of its provisions. arrangements, however this is outside the scope of the current process. Figure 112 in the Amendment shows Yarralumla Bay as a ‘development node’ and that 'development is to be limited to small scale items that help recreation and tourism…’. Given existing provisions relating to Yarralumla Bay as an aquatic recreation hub, and current challenges to these provisions, what confidence can the public have that the proposed ‘small scale’ development referred to will not turn out to be ‘large scale’ development in conflict with the aquatic recreation focus? The NCA has previously supported the idea of a master plan or similar for the Lake and its foreshore Such a framework could recognise areas of heritage and conservation value, identify suitable nodes for development, and ensure that lakeside development is appropriate to the location. Through the Consultation Report in response to the Exposure Draft of the Plan, the NCA advised that review of Precinct Codes will commence once the new format and structure of the Plan is in place has. The ‘Lake Burley Griffin and Foreshores Precinct Code’ will form an early stage of Precinct Code review. The NCA considers this process the most appropriate to address concerns
MS16-000682%20-%20Attachement%20H%20-%20Amendment%2086%20-%20Consultation%20Report%20%20%28April%202016%29_0.docx