- abstract - [Reliability 4] - guideline study without - secondary literature - [Reliability 4] detailed documentation - - documentation insufficient for assessment - [Reliability 2] [Reliability 4] - guideline study with - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and acceptable restrictions - falling into its applicability domain, with adequate [Reliability 2] and reliable documentation / justification - - comparable to guideline [Reliability 1 or 2] study with acceptable - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and restrictions - [Reliability 2] falling into its applicability domain, with limited - test procedure in documentation / justification - [Reliability 2, 3 or 4] accordance with national - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but standard methods with not (completely) falling into its applicability acceptable restrictions - domain, with adequate and reliable [Reliability 2] documentation / justification - [Reliability 2 or 3] - study well documented, - results derived from a (Q)SAR model, with meets generally accepted limited documentation / justification, but validity of scientific principles, model and reliability of prediction considered acceptable for adequate based on a generally acknowledged assessment - [Reliability source - [Reliability 2 or 3] 2] - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but - accepted calculation not (completely) falling into its applicability method - [Reliability 2] domain, and documentation / justification is - data from handbook or limited - [Reliability 3 or 4] collection of data - - results derived from a (Q)SAR model, with [Reliability 2] limited documentation / justification - [Reliability 4] - significant - other: methodological deficiencies - [Reliability 3] - unsuitable test system - [Reliability 3] - abstract - [Reliability 4] - secondary literature - [Reliability 4] - documentation insufficient for assessment - [Reliability 4] Condition 2: If 'Type of information' = '(Q)SAR': - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation /
- abstract - [Reliability 4] - secondary literature - [Reliability 4] - documentation insufficient for assessment - [Reliability 4] - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification - [Reliability 1 or 2] - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification - [Reliability 2, 3 or 4] - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification - [Reliability 2 or 3] - results derived from a (Q)SAR model, with limited documentation / justification, but validity of model and reliability of prediction considered adequate based on a generally acknowledged source - [Reliability 2 or 3] - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, and documentation / justification is limited - [Reliability 3 or 4] - results derived from a (Q)SAR model, with limited documentation / justification - [Reliability 4] - other: - guideline study without detailed documentation - [Reliability 2] - guideline study with acceptable restrictions - [Reliability 2] - comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions - [Reliability 2] - test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions - [Reliability 2] - study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment - [Reliability 2] - accepted calculation method - [Reliability 2] - data from handbook or collection of data - [Reliability 2] - significant methodological deficiencies - [Reliability 3] - unsuitable test system - [Reliability 3] - abstract - [Reliability 4] - secondary literature - [Reliability 4] - documentation insufficient for assessment - [Reliability 4] Condition 2: If 'Type of information' = '(Q)SAR': - results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation /
OHT%2070%20-%20ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.GeneticToxicityVitro%20-version%207.0%20-Dec%202017.docx