developing a final set of recommended metrics for reviewing and evaluating SCE’s Load Management strategy: Capacity factors for renewable generators; Coincidence of customers’ use of Preferred Resources; Customer load factor; Curtailment of renewable energy; Utilization of EVSE; Strategic placement of EVSE, and as applicable the associated Distributed Energy Resources, consistent with the system locational benefit considerations of AB 327 and R.14-08-013; and Participation in complementary Low-Income Programs for eligible MultiFamily Residential (or Multi-Unit Dwelling) customers. We recognize that the quantity of charging infrastructure installed under the pilot itself may not result in measurable impacts on all of the factors listed above, and that some factors, such as strategic placement of EVSE, may not be elements of the pilot program design. However, we see value in tracking these trends in order to enable better understanding of potential impacts alluded to in the Guiding Principles as EVSE deployment will increase in the future, and to maintain holistic oversight of SCE’s complementary customer programs. 3.10. Disadvantaged Communities In its application SCE proposes to deploy up to 10% of the charging infrastructure in disadvantaged communities, as defined using the California Environmental Protection Agency’s (CalEPA) California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen 2.0). SCE bases its
developing a final set of recommended metrics for reviewing and evaluating SCE’s Load Management strategy: Capacity factors for renewable generators; Coincidence of customers’ use of Preferred Resources; Customer load factor; Curtailment of renewable energy; Utilization of EVSE; Strategic placement of EVSE, and as applicable the associated Distributed Energy Resources, consistent with the system locational benefit considerations of AB 327 and R.14-08-013; and Participation in complementary Low-Income Programs for eligible MultiFamily Residential (or Multi-Unit Dwelling) customers. We recognize that the quantity of charging infrastructure installed under the pilot itself may not result in measurable impacts on all of the factors listed above, and that some factors, such as strategic placement of EVSE, may not be elements of the pilot program design. However, we see value in tracking these trends in order to enable better understanding of potential impacts alluded to in the Guiding Principles as EVSE deployment will increase in the future, and to maintain holistic oversight of SCE’s complementary customer programs. 3.10. Disadvantaged Communities In its application SCE proposes to deploy up to 10% of the charging infrastructure in disadvantaged communities, as defined using the California Environmental Protection Agency’s (CalEPA) California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen 2.0). SCE bases its
157835660.docx