Discussion References Likely Performance Indicator (e.g. <60, 60-79, ≥80) PI 1.2.2 Harvest control rules and tools – PI 1.2.2 are well defined and effective harvest control rules (HCRs) in place Scoring Issue SG 60 SG 80 SG 100 HCRs design and application Generally understood HCRs Well defined HCRs are in The HCRs are expected to are in place or available that place that ensure that the keep the fluctuating at are expected to reduce the exploitation rate is reduced as or above a target level exploitation rate as the point the PRI is approached, are consistent with MSY, or Guide of recruitment impairment expected to keep the stock another more appropriate a post (PRI) is approached. fluctuating around a target level taking into account the level consistent with (or ecological role of the stock, above) MSY, or for key LTL most of the time. species a level consistent with ecosystem needs. Met? HCRs robustness to uncertainty The HCRs are likely to be The HCRs take account of a robust to the main wide of uncertainties uncertainties. including the ecological role of b the stock, and there is post evidence that the HCRs are robust to the main uncertainties. Met? HCRs evaluation c There is some evidence that Available evidence Evidence clearly that Guide tools used or available to indicates that the tools in use the tools in use are effective post implement HCRs are are appropriate and effective in achieving the exploitation
Discussion References Likely Performance Indicator (e.g. <60, 60-79, ≥80) PI 1.2.2 – Harvest control rules and tools PI 1.2.2 are well defined and effective harvest control rules (HCRs) in place Scoring Issue SG 60 SG 80 SG 100 a HCRs design and application Guide post Generally understood HCRs are in place or available that are expected to reduce the exploitation rate as the point of recruitment impairment (PRI) is approached. Well defined HCRs are in place that ensure that the exploitation rate is reduced as the PRI is approached, are expected to keep the stock fluctuating around a target level consistent with (or above) MSY, or for key LTL species a level consistent with ecosystem needs. The HCRs are expected to keep the fluctuating at or above a target level consistent with MSY, or another more appropriate level taking into account the ecological role of the stock, most of the time. Met? b HCRs robustness to uncertainty post The HCRs are likely to be robust to the main uncertainties. The HCRs take account of a wide of uncertainties including the ecological role of the stock, and there is evidence that the HCRs are robust to the main uncertainties. Met? c HCRs evaluation Guide post There is some evidence that tools used or available to implement HCRs are Available evidence indicates that the tools in use are appropriate and effective Evidence clearly that the tools in use are effective in achieving the exploitation
MSC_Client_Preparation_Assessment_Report_Template_v0.1.docx