AJ can it not be offered cheaper if workshops were a longer period of – time? SN covered this in his circular; queried the credibility of other groups. – EN project meets aims of the OV. There is the option of offering a – lower amount than that requested. SN emails from Allerton & Canon Peter Hall schools confirming their – interest. JK-noted that email is not from the Head Teacher of CPH. JK no response from Coomb Brigg and Eastfield not interested. – BD admires TH enthusiasm for the project but concerns it is not – connected with Fair Trade and it is a Business venture. EN which business? – BD Oasis – EN-Oasis is a charity organisation and the project is linked with Fair trade and supports this initaive. SN asks for clarifications on reservations of the project. – BD cannot see how much of impact workshops over a period of 14 – days will alter much. EN if funding can be provided the planning of workshops will be – – done with have the maximum impact. SN planning cannot be done until funding in place. – JK Stated the Thomas Horton said that if OV does not support it, will – the project still go ahead. Vote EN proposed full £4k funding seconded by LB & SN. – For 4 – Against 8 – Vote EN proposed lower amount of £10k funding, seconded by LB & – SN For 5 – Against 7 – No funding to be given to the project. SN What about the £1k re the faith element. This was accepted at last – meeting but no official decision taken. *Please Note a vote should have been taken place regarding this so a the Motion to award £1000 to vote was taken following this meeting this project was passed with a clear majority Vote * Matters arising from See updates on tracker. Minutes Suggestion of representation for IRC to be EN & LA This was due past involvement with the project and the experience LA has in working at
AJ – can it not be offered cheaper if workshops were a longer period of time? SN – covered this in his circular; queried the credibility of other groups. EN – project meets aims of the OV. There is the option of offering a lower amount than that requested. SN – emails from Allerton & Canon Peter Hall schools confirming their interest. JK-noted that email is not from the Head Teacher of CPH. JK – no response from Coomb Brigg and Eastfield not interested. BD – admires TH enthusiasm for the project but concerns it is not connected with Fair Trade and it is a Business venture. EN – which business? BD – Oasis EN-Oasis is a charity organisation and the project is linked with Fair trade and supports this initaive. SN – asks for clarifications on reservations of the project. BD – cannot see how much of impact workshops over a period of 14 days will alter much. EN – if funding can be provided – the planning of workshops will be done with have the maximum impact. SN – planning cannot be done until funding in place. JK – Stated the Thomas Horton said that if OV does not support it, will the project still go ahead. Vote – EN proposed full £4k funding seconded by LB & SN. For – 4 Against – 8 Vote – EN proposed lower amount of £10k funding, seconded by LB & SN For – 5 Against – 7 No funding to be given to the project. SN – What about the £1k re the faith element. This was accepted at last meeting but no official decision taken. *Please Note a vote should have been taken place regarding this so a vote was taken following this meeting the Motion to award £1000 to this project was passed with a clear majority Vote * Matters arising from Minutes See updates on tracker. Suggestion of representation for IRC to be EN & LA This was due past involvement with the project and the experience LA has in working at
Minutes-2013-11.docx