[Note: Insert as much text as required to justify the SG achieved for this scoring issue] Justification d The assessment has been tested and shown to be robust. Alternative hypotheses and assessment approaches have been rigorously explored. Guidepost Met? (Y/N) [Note: Insert as much text as required to justify the SG level achieved for this scoring issue] Justification e The assessment of The assessment has been stock status is subject internally and externally peer to peer review. reviewed. Guidepost Met? (Y/N) (Y/N) [Note: Insert as much text as required to justify the SG level achieved for this scoring issue] Justification References [List any references here] OVERALL PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SCORE: CONDITION NUMBER (if relevant): Evaluation Table for PI 2.1.1 The fishery does not pose a risk of serious or irreversible harm to the PI 2.1.1 retained species and does not hinder recovery of depleted retained species Scoring Issue SG 60 SG 80 SG 100
Justification [Note: Insert as much text as required to justify the SG achieved for this scoring issue] d Guidepost The assessment has been tested and shown to be robust. Alternative hypotheses and assessment approaches have been rigorously explored. Met? (Y/N) Justification [Note: Insert as much text as required to justify the SG level achieved for this scoring issue] e Guidepost The assessment of stock status is subject to peer review. The assessment has been internally and externally peer reviewed. Met? (Y/N) (Y/N) Justification [Note: Insert as much text as required to justify the SG level achieved for this scoring issue] References [List any references here] OVERALL PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SCORE: CONDITION NUMBER (if relevant): Evaluation Table for PI 2.1.1 PI 2.1.1 The fishery does not pose a risk of serious or irreversible harm to the retained species and does not hinder recovery of depleted retained species Scoring Issue SG 60 SG 80 SG 100
msc_full_assessment_reporting_template_v1-3.docx