SCE, SEIA, the Natural Resources Defense Council and ORA to keep Schedule TOU-D-T open until the rates implementing SCE’s 2018 GRC Phase 2 become effective, notwithstanding any pending proposal to the contrary in this GRC Phase 2 proceeding. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement disturbs any portion of the RDW Settlement Agreement, including this provision. Third, SCE proposed updated diversity adjustments, submetering discounts and minimum average rates for master-metered customers on the assumption that its tiered rate proposal in the RROIR would be adopted. WMA did not serve testimony but intervened in this proceeding to ensure that its interests were protected with respect to these rates. Because the Commission did not adopt SCE’s tiered rate proposal in the RROIR, the Settlement Agreement adopts updates to the diversity adjustment, submetering discount and minimum average rate consistent with the adjustments the Commission adopted to the tiered rates in the RROIR. In sum, because most residential rate design issues were litigated and resolved in the RROIR and the 2013 RDW proceeding, there are fewer issues in this GRC Phase 2 than is normally the case; that small number of issues was resolved to the Settling Parties’ satisfaction. 3.2.2. Commercial Rate Design There were three main issues in this proceeding for small commercial rate design. The issue concerned the timing and program design for default critical peak pricing (CPP) for small and medium commercial customers. This matter was addressed and resolved in the Marginal Cost and Revenue Allocation
SCE, SEIA, the Natural Resources Defense Council and ORA to keep Schedule TOU-D-T open until the rates implementing SCE’s 2018 GRC Phase 2 become effective, notwithstanding any pending proposal to the contrary in this GRC Phase 2 proceeding. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement disturbs any portion of the RDW Settlement Agreement, including this provision. Third, SCE proposed updated diversity adjustments, submetering discounts and minimum average rates for master-metered customers on the assumption that its tiered rate proposal in the RROIR would be adopted. WMA did not serve testimony but intervened in this proceeding to ensure that its interests were protected with respect to these rates. Because the Commission did not adopt SCE’s tiered rate proposal in the RROIR, the Settlement Agreement adopts updates to the diversity adjustment, submetering discount and minimum average rate consistent with the adjustments the Commission adopted to the tiered rates in the RROIR. In sum, because most residential rate design issues were litigated and resolved in the RROIR and the 2013 RDW proceeding, there are fewer issues in this GRC Phase 2 than is normally the case; that small number of issues was resolved to the Settling Parties’ satisfaction. 3.2.2. Commercial Rate Design There were three main issues in this proceeding for small commercial rate design. The issue concerned the timing and program design for default critical peak pricing (CPP) for small and medium commercial customers. This matter was addressed and resolved in the Marginal Cost and Revenue Allocation
159653461.docx