NRF/SAASTA reserves the right to communicate recommendations/queries and the right to request the service provider to provide a revision of their original proposal in terms of such recommendations / queries only. To be returned to SAASTA as per the instructed deadline provided in the feedback. The Evaluation Criteria on Technical aspects for Awarding of Proposals are: NO. ELEMENT WEIGHTING SCORE 0 100 ACTIVITIES PROPOSED PROJECT MANAGEMENT Evaluation of this – 1. component will be found in the log frame (item: inputs page 25) Is the project well resourced? (input page 25) In terms of 1.1. 5 references i.e. websites, libraries, specialists etc. 1.2. Does it align to the objectives? (Page 29) 5 Are clear indicators against which the success of the 1.3. 5 project can be evaluated? Are the timelines clearly specified and are there clear 1.4. 5 timelines for planning leading up to implementation? 2. REACH District rating as per annexure A (1 easy - 3 difficult) , – 2.1. has the geographical reach been clearly defined in terms 5 of municipal districts as per Annexure A? To what extent has the proposal covered the target 2.2. 15 audience (page29)? Can the structure of the proposal provide each of the 2.3. participants with an appreciation of the value of science in 10 their lives? 3. CONTENT: How well is the content of the proposal aligned to the 3.1. objectives, theme and topics as outlined in the Terms of 15 Reference? How does the proposal guarantee the quality of the 4. scientific content with reference to: 4.1. The scientific integrity of the messages 5 The appropriateness in which the messages are 4.2. 5 packaged? Confidence in the ability to deliver: 5. Here the evaluation will be looking at experience and knowledge of the project leader and team 5.1. Has the team implemented similar projects? 5 Does the team have access to or hold the capacity to 5.2. 5 implement the project? Does the proposal show a full understanding of the 5.3. capacity needed to run the proposed implementation 5 successfully? 6. MARKETING AND BRANDING: Does the proposal include a marketing and advertising 6.1. 10 plan of the intended activities?
NRF/SAASTA reserves the right to communicate recommendations/queries and the right to request the service provider to provide a revision of their original proposal in terms of such recommendations / queries only. To be returned to SAASTA as per the instructed deadline provided in the feedback. The Evaluation Criteria on Technical aspects for Awarding of Proposals are: NO. ELEMENT WEIGHTING SCORE ACTIVITIES PROPOSED 100 0 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT – Evaluation of this component will be found in the log frame (item: inputs page 25) 1.1. Is the project well resourced? (input page 25) In terms of references i.e. websites, libraries, specialists etc. 5 1.2. Does it align to the objectives? (Page 29) 5 1.3. Are clear indicators against which the success of the project can be evaluated? 5 1.4. Are the timelines clearly specified and are there clear timelines for planning leading up to implementation? 5 2. REACH 2.1. District rating as per annexure A – (1 easy - 3 difficult) , has the geographical reach been clearly defined in terms of municipal districts as per Annexure A? 5 2.2. To what extent has the proposal covered the target audience (page29)? 15 2.3. Can the structure of the proposal provide each of the participants with an appreciation of the value of science in their lives? 10 3. CONTENT: 3.1. How well is the content of the proposal aligned to the objectives, theme and topics as outlined in the Terms of Reference? 15 4. How does the proposal guarantee the quality of the scientific content with reference to: 4.1. The scientific integrity of the messages 5 4.2. The appropriateness in which the messages are packaged? 5 5. Confidence in the ability to deliver: Here the evaluation will be looking at experience and knowledge of the project leader and team 5.1. Has the team implemented similar projects? 5 5.2. Does the team have access to or hold the capacity to implement the project? 5 5.3. Does the proposal show a full understanding of the capacity needed to run the proposed implementation successfully? 5 6. MARKETING AND BRANDING: 6.1. Does the proposal include a marketing and advertising plan of the intended activities? 10
NSW_2014__bid_document_final.docx