Segal, Jeffrey and Harold J. Spaeth. New York: The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge University 1993. Segal, Jeffrey A. and Harold J. Spaeth. influence of stare decisis on the votes of US “The Supreme Court justices.” 40 (1996). American Journal of Political Science Segal, Jeffrey A. and Harold J. Spaeth. dragons and stare decisis: A response.” “Norms, 40 (1996). American Journal of Political Science Segal, Jeffrey A. values and the votes of U.S. Supreme Court justices revisited.” “Ideological 57(1995): 812. The Journal of Politics Songer, Donald R. and Stefanie A. Lindquist. the whole story: The impact of justice’s “Not values on Supreme Court decision-making.” 40 American Journal of Political Science (1996): 1049-1063. Spaeth, Harold J. and Jeffrey Segal. Majority rule or minority will: Adherence to precedent on Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1999. the U.S. Supreme Court. Tushnet, Mark. New York, NY: W.W. In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court. Norton & Company, 2013. Isaac and Ange-Marie Hancock. Court Decision Making, Case Salience, and the “Supreme Attitudinal Model.” 28 (2006): 295-320. Law & Policy Walhbeck, Paul, James Spriggs, and Forrest Maltzman. the Court: Bargaining and “Marshalling Accommodation on the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political (January 1998): 294-315. Science Winkler, Adam. Coming of the Kagan Court.” (October 6, 2013): 1-2. Slate “The Wohl, Alexander. v. Ohio Turns 50: If a moderate Texan could love the exclusionary “Mapp rule, why can't judicial conservatives?” (June 7, 2011): 1-2. Slate .
Segal, Jeffrey and Harold J. Spaeth. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University 1993. Segal, Jeffrey A. and Harold J. Spaeth. “The influence of stare decisis on the votes of US Supreme Court justices.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1996). Segal, Jeffrey A. and Harold J. Spaeth. “Norms, dragons and stare decisis: A response.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1996). Segal, Jeffrey A. “Ideological values and the votes of U.S. Supreme Court justices revisited.” The Journal of Politics 57(1995): 812. Songer, Donald R. and Stefanie A. Lindquist. “Not the whole story: The impact of justice’s values on Supreme Court decision-making.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1996): 1049-1063. Spaeth, Harold J. and Jeffrey Segal. Majority rule or minority will: Adherence to precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Tushnet, Mark. In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 2013. Isaac and Ange-Marie Hancock. “Supreme Court Decision Making, Case Salience, and the Attitudinal Model.” Law & Policy 28 (2006): 295-320. Walhbeck, Paul, James Spriggs, and Forrest Maltzman. “Marshalling the Court: Bargaining and Accommodation on the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science (January 1998): 294-315. Winkler, Adam. “The Coming of the Kagan Court.” Slate (October 6, 2013): 1-2. Wohl, Alexander. “Mapp v. Ohio Turns 50: If a moderate Texan could love the exclusionary rule, why can't judicial conservatives?” Slate (June 7, 2011): 1-2. .
ModerateBehaviorontheRobertsCourtbyPaulFoote.docx