Size: Gender (Percent): Male: _____ Female: _____ Unknown: _____ SES (Percent, measured as free or reduced-price lunch): _____ Eligible for free or reduced-price lunch: _____ Other SES Indicators: _____ Race/Ethnicity (Percent): White, Non-Hispanic: _____ Black, Non-Hispanic: _____ Hispanic: _____ American Indian/Alaska Native: _____ Asian/Pacific Islander: _____ _____ Unknown: _____ Disability classification (Please describe): _____ First language (Please describe): _____ Language proficiency status (Please describe): _____ Describe the criterion (outcome) measure(s) including the degree to which it is independent from the screening measure. Describe how the cross-validation analyses were performed and cut-points determined. Describe how the cut points align with (a) at-risk and/or (b) intensive need. Were the children in the cross-validation study involved in an intervention in addition to typical classroom instruction between the screening measure and outcome assessment? Yes No If yes, please describe the intervention, what children are receiving the intervention, and how they were chosen. Technical Standard 5. Bias Analysis Have you conducted additional analyses related to the extent to your tool is or is not biased against subgroups (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, students with disabilities, English language learners)? Examples might include Differential Item Functioning (DIF), or invariance testing in multiple-group confirmatory factor models. Yes No If yes, please provide the following information for each grade level/span and informant version of your assessment.
Size: Gender (Percent): Male: _____ Female: _____ Unknown: _____ SES (Percent, measured as free or reduced-price lunch): _____ Eligible for free or reduced-price lunch: _____ Other SES Indicators: _____ Race/Ethnicity (Percent): White, Non-Hispanic: _____ Black, Non-Hispanic: _____ Hispanic: _____ American Indian/Alaska Native: _____ Asian/Pacific Islander: _____ _____ Unknown: _____ Disability classification (Please describe): _____ First language (Please describe): _____ Language proficiency status (Please describe): _____ Describe the criterion (outcome) measure(s) including the degree to which it is independent from the screening measure. Describe how the cross-validation analyses were performed and cut-points determined. Describe how the cut points align with (a) at-risk and/or (b) intensive need. Were the children in the cross-validation study involved in an intervention in addition to typical classroom instruction between the screening measure and outcome assessment? Yes No If yes, please describe the intervention, what children are receiving the intervention, and how they were chosen. Technical Standard 5. Bias Analysis Have you conducted additional analyses related to the extent to your tool is or is not biased against subgroups (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, students with disabilities, English language learners)? Examples might include Differential Item Functioning (DIF), or invariance testing in multiple-group confirmatory factor models. Yes No If yes, please provide the following information for each grade level/span and informant version of your assessment.
NCII_BScreening_SubmissionProtocol_July2017.docx