Additional Comments on Part I: # Intervenor’s Comment(s) CPUC Discussion 15 A4NR had planned to file its Verified. compensation for its sanctions motion after the Commission’s final decision on A4NR’s still pending Petition for Modification, but clarified that D.15-12-016 has resolved the proceeding except for pending petitions for modification and an application for rehearing. A4NR has severed all PFM-related costs, and will defer seeking their reimbursement pending a final Commission decision on that matter. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Specific References to Intervenor’s CPUC Discussion Contribution(s) Claimed Contribution(s) 1. One day after SCE late-filed A4NR 02/10/15 Motion. Verified. a Notice of Ex Parte ALJs’ 04/14/15 Ruling noted A4NR Communication describing a Motion, p. 3, and agreed that SCE’s meeting nearly two years Notice little information about “offered earlier between its Exec. VP the content of the meeting,” p. 5. Steven Pickett and CPUC ALJs’ 04/14/15 Ruling also agreed that President Michael Peevey, the Commission has the authority to A4NR filed a Motion seek additional information regarding a requesting that the late-filed or undisclosed ex parte Commission investigate the communication for purposes of extent of appropriate sanctions evaluating possible sanctions, including for violations of Rule 1.1 and whether the breach of Rule 8.4, under its predicate, Rule 8.4. the totality of circumstances, is also a breach of Rule 1.1, pp. 4-5. 2. A4NR’s 02/10/15 Motion A4NR 02/10/15 Motion, p. 9. Verified. sought disclosure of ALJs’ 04/14/15 Ruling ordered SCE to related communications produce additional information and between SCE and the Commission, as well as
Additional Comments on Part I: # Intervenor’s Comment(s) CPUC Discussion 15 A4NR had planned to file its compensation for its sanctions motion after the Commission’s final decision on A4NR’s still pending Petition for Modification, but clarified that D.15-12-016 has resolved the proceeding except for pending petitions for modification and an application for rehearing. A4NR has severed all PFM-related costs, and will defer seeking their reimbursement pending a final Commission decision on that matter. Verified. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion 1. One day after SCE late-filed a Notice of Ex Parte Communication describing a meeting nearly two years earlier between its Exec. VP Steven Pickett and CPUC President Michael Peevey, A4NR filed a Motion requesting that the Commission investigate the extent of appropriate sanctions for violations of Rule 1.1 and its predicate, Rule 8.4. A4NR 02/10/15 Motion. ALJs’ 04/14/15 Ruling noted A4NR Motion, p. 3, and agreed that SCE’s Notice “offered little information about the content of the meeting,” p. 5. ALJs’ 04/14/15 Ruling also agreed that the Commission has the authority to seek additional information regarding a late-filed or undisclosed ex parte communication for purposes of evaluating possible sanctions, including whether the breach of Rule 8.4, under the totality of circumstances, is also a breach of Rule 1.1, pp. 4-5. Verified. 2. A4NR’s 02/10/15 Motion sought disclosure of communications between SCE and the Commission, as well as A4NR 02/10/15 Motion, p. 9. ALJs’ 04/14/15 Ruling ordered SCE to produce additional information and Verified. related
164558176.docx