Elements Required for EJ Analysis (Per FTA C. Included in EJ Analysis for 4702.1A, IV, 8. a-f) Pennsauken Junction Transit Center? A description of the low-income and minority Yes population within the study area affected by the project A discussion of all adverse effects of the project both Yes, during construction only; during and construction that would affect the No discussion of affects, if any identified minority and low-income population after construction. A discussion of all positive effects that would affect No the identified minority and low-income population A description of all mitigation and environmental Yes enhancement actions incorporated into the project to address the adverse effects A discussion of the remaining effects, if any, and Not Addressed why further mitigation is not proposed For projects that traverse predominantly minority and Not Applicable low-income and predominantly non-minority and non-low-income a comparison of mitigation and environmental enhancement actions that affect both areas. NJ TRANSIT also provided EJ documentation for the following mix of projects classified as CEs and/or EAs: Waldwick Rail Station Park & Ride, June 2004 Categorical Exclusion – Newark Broad Street Station ADA Improvement and Capacity Relief Project, October 2003 Environmental Evaluation – Morris County Intermodal Transit Center and Park-and-Ride at Howard Boulevard, December 2004 Environmental Evaluation – North Hackensack Park & Ride Expansion Project, June 2005 Categorical – Exclusion Edison Rail Station Park and Ride Project, June 2005 Categorical – Exclusion Metropark Station Platform Reconstruction Project, April 2006 – Categorical Exclusion Plauderville (Garfield) Station Accessibility Improvement Project Bergen County Line, July 2006 Environmental Evaluation –
Elements Required for EJ Analysis (Per FTA C. 4702.1A, IV, 8. a-f) Included in EJ Analysis for Pennsauken Junction Transit Center? A description of the low-income and minority population within the study area affected by the project Yes A discussion of all adverse effects of the project both during and construction that would affect the identified minority and low-income population Yes, during construction only; No discussion of affects, if any after construction. A discussion of all positive effects that would affect the identified minority and low-income population No A description of all mitigation and environmental enhancement actions incorporated into the project to address the adverse effects Yes A discussion of the remaining effects, if any, and why further mitigation is not proposed Not Addressed For projects that traverse predominantly minority and low-income and predominantly non-minority and non-low-income a comparison of mitigation and environmental enhancement actions that affect both areas. Not Applicable NJ TRANSIT also provided EJ documentation for the following mix of projects classified as CEs and/or EAs: Waldwick Rail Station Park & Ride, June 2004 – Categorical Exclusion Newark Broad Street Station ADA Improvement and Capacity Relief Project, October 2003 – Environmental Evaluation Morris County Intermodal Transit Center and Park-and-Ride at Howard Boulevard, December 2004 – Environmental Evaluation North Hackensack Park & Ride Expansion Project, June 2005 – Categorical Exclusion Edison Rail Station Park and Ride Project, June 2005 – Categorical Exclusion Metropark Station Platform Reconstruction Project, April 2006 – Categorical Exclusion Plauderville (Garfield) Station Accessibility Improvement Project Bergen County Line, July 2006 – Environmental Evaluation
NJ_Transit_Title_VI_Final_Report.docx