Author(s) Participant Time Other Country Qualitative description since interviews methodology (n, sex, age) stroke at 1st 13 Rittman et N=125 1-6 months None USA Mixed methods: al., 2007 M=123 F=2 computer assisted Age 40-93 thematic analysis for qualitative component 14 Robison et N=19 7-39 days 12 months England Framework al., 2009 M=11 F=8 post post stroke analysis Age 53-85 discharge (median 16 days) 15 Rochette et N=5 3-4 weeks 3 and 6 Canada methods: al., 2007 M=1 F=4 months post qualitative Age 61-83 stroke component based on phenomenology 16 et al., N=31 3, 6, 9 and 12 Australia Iterative “At 2012a M=17 F=14 baseline” months with methodology Age 37-94 for 23 23 Analysis: An participants. participants. inductive Unclear Single thematic when interview with approach using 8 participants modified took place grounded theory 17 White et al., N=22 3, 6, 9 and 12 Australia Iterative “At 2012b M=10 F=12 baseline” months with methodology Age 50-94 for 16. 16 Analysis: An Unclear participants. inductive when Single thematic interview with approach using took place 6 participants modified grounded theory 18 Wood et al., N=10 2 weeks, 3, 6 Canada Symbolic 2010 M=6 F=4 and 12 interactionism Age 31-79 months post Grounded stroke theory-inductive approach Age reported as mean standard deviation IQR= Interquartile range
Author(s) Participant description (n, sex, age) Time since stroke at 1st Other interviews Country Qualitative methodology 13 Rittman et al., 2007 N=125 M=123 F=2 Age 40-93 1-6 months None USA Mixed methods: computer assisted thematic analysis for qualitative component 14 Robison et al., 2009 N=19 M=11 F=8 Age 53-85 7-39 days post discharge (median 16 days) 12 months post stroke England Framework analysis 15 Rochette et al., 2007 N=5 M=1 F=4 Age 61-83 3-4 weeks 3 and 6 months post stroke Canada methods: qualitative component based on phenomenology 16 et al., 2012a N=31 M=17 F=14 Age 37-94 “At baseline” for 23 participants. Unclear when took place 3, 6, 9 and 12 months with 23 participants. Single interview with 8 participants Australia Iterative methodology Analysis: An inductive thematic approach using modified grounded theory 17 White et al., 2012b N=22 M=10 F=12 Age 50-94 “At baseline” for 16. Unclear when took place 3, 6, 9 and 12 months with 16 participants. Single interview with 6 participants Australia Iterative methodology Analysis: An inductive thematic approach using modified grounded theory 18 Wood et al., 2010 N=10 M=6 F=4 Age 31-79 2 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months post stroke Canada Symbolic interactionism Grounded theory-inductive approach Age reported as mean standard deviation IQR= Interquartile range
National-Survey-of-Stroke-Survivors.docx