13, 2016 and December 07, 2016, it would be necessary that UPPCL and M/s RKM Powergen should reply on the points raised. Hence,the Commission directed that the objections of ShriR.S.Awasthibe sent to UPPCL and RKM Powergento submit their replies, which are captured in next section of this Order. To the written objections of Shri Rama Shankar Awasthi, Public Representative, filed written objections on October 13, 2016 and December 07, 2016, the replies have been filed by RKM Powergen on January 3, 2017 and by UPPCL on January 9, 2017, which have been mentioned in the next section of this order. VIEWS / COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS / OBJECTIONS Shri Rama Shankar Awasthi’s Objection dated October 13, 2016, and its replies filed by RKM Powergen and UPPCL At the stage no Order was passed by the Commission on September 28, 2015, in respect of the status of LoI issued to RKM Powergen on dated May 22, 2015, by the UPPCL and same stand cancelled by UPPCL on dated December 19, 2013 and as such it stood terminated on the date of passing of the Order dated September 28, 2015, in Petition No. 946 of 2014 by the Commission and still stands terminated till date. Reply: UPPCL vide its submission dated January 9, 2017, denied the contention made by Shri R. S. Awasthi and submitted that UPPCL has restored the LoI dated May 22, 2013, vide letter no. 2025/Plg/UMPP/6000 MW dated May 8, 2015, and the Commission has approved the restoration of LoI vide Order dated February 11, 2016, in Petition No. 1078 of 2015. RKM Powergen’s Reply: RKM Powergen also vide its submission dated January 3, 2017, denied the contention made by Shri R. S. Awasthi and submitted that UPPCL has restored the LoI dated May 22, 2013, vide letter no. 2025/Plg/UMPP/6000 MW dated May 8, 2015, and the Commission has approved the restoration of LoI vide Order dated February 11, 2016, in Petition No. 1078 of 2015.
13, 2016 and December 07, 2016, it would be necessary that UPPCL and M/s RKM Powergen should reply on the points raised. Hence,the Commission directed that the objections of ShriR.S.Awasthibe sent to UPPCL and RKM Powergento submit their replies, which are captured in next section of this Order. To the written objections of Shri Rama Shankar Awasthi, Public Representative, filed written objections on October 13, 2016 and December 07, 2016, the replies have been filed by RKM Powergen on January 3, 2017 and by UPPCL on January 9, 2017, which have been mentioned in the next section of this order. VIEWS / COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS / OBJECTIONS Shri Rama Shankar Awasthi’s Objection dated October 13, 2016, and its replies filed by RKM Powergen and UPPCL At the stage no Order was passed by the Commission on September 28, 2015, in respect of the status of LoI issued to RKM Powergen on dated May 22, 2015, by the UPPCL and same stand cancelled by UPPCL on dated December 19, 2013 and as such it stood terminated on the date of passing of the Order dated September 28, 2015, in Petition No. 946 of 2014 by the Commission and still stands terminated till date. Reply: UPPCL vide its submission dated January 9, 2017, denied the contention made by Shri R. S. Awasthi and submitted that UPPCL has restored the LoI dated May 22, 2013, vide letter no. 2025/Plg/UMPP/6000 MW dated May 8, 2015, and the Commission has approved the restoration of LoI vide Order dated February 11, 2016, in Petition No. 1078 of 2015. RKM Powergen’s Reply: RKM Powergen also vide its submission dated January 3, 2017, denied the contention made by Shri R. S. Awasthi and submitted that UPPCL has restored the LoI dated May 22, 2013, vide letter no. 2025/Plg/UMPP/6000 MW dated May 8, 2015, and the Commission has approved the restoration of LoI vide Order dated February 11, 2016, in Petition No. 1078 of 2015.
OrderUPPCLRKMPowergen-01-02-2017-docx222017111005AM.docx