2. If you could change one thing to improve the school what would it be? (If you were the Principal, what would you do differently?) The data gained from the student session was fed back to the review panel immediately after it occurred. A review report was prepared by the reviewer and sent to the Principal and peers for comment prior to final submission to Monash University and the DEECD for quality assurance. Table 1: Timeline for the Peer Review Date Activity Resources Action officer Term 1, 2014 Briefing to on Staff meeting time. Anna Kukuruzovic. upcoming review Term 1, 2014 Establishment of Staff commitment. Anna Kukuruzovic and leadership team. School Self Evaluation Committee 2 and 3, Preparation of the SSE School Portal data. Anna Kukuruzovic and school staff. 2014 and school data 2011-2014 SSP and many data package files. Multiple meeting times. Parent and student Forums. August 14, 2014 Preliminary visit Data files, VRQA folders. Anna Kukuruzovic and Discussion between External leadership team with Reviewer and Leadership Team. Hildebrand. School tour and meeting key August 14 to Analysis of data and Reviewer’s time and data Gaell Hildebrand August 28, 2014 information analysis skills. collected on the VRQA detailed preliminary visit. August 28, 2014 Peer review panel day SSE. Data files. Focus group of Peer Review Panel students. and invited others. Panel input. August 28 to Drafting of the review Reviewer’s time. Gaell Hildebrand September 16, report and checking by Data analysis. Anna Kukuruzovic 2014 the Principal. Peer review panel day evidence. September 16, Submission of finalised Quality Assurance processes Gaell Hildebrand 2014 completed via Monash University Peer Review Report. Monash University and DEECD. DEECD TBC Presentation to Review Report. Anna Kukuruzovic and and School Council. Assistant Principals Time to prepare presentation.
2. If you could change one thing to improve the school what would it be? (If you were the Principal, what would you do differently?) The data gained from the student session was fed back to the review panel immediately after it occurred. A review report was prepared by the reviewer and sent to the Principal and peers for comment prior to final submission to Monash University and the DEECD for quality assurance. Table 1: Timeline for the Peer Review Date Activity Resources Action officer Term 1, 2014 Briefing to on upcoming review Staff meeting time. Anna Kukuruzovic. Term 1, 2014 Establishment of School Self Evaluation Committee Staff commitment. Anna Kukuruzovic and leadership team. 2 and 3, 2014 Preparation of the SSE and school data package School Portal data. 2011-2014 SSP and many data files. Multiple meeting times. Parent and student Forums. Anna Kukuruzovic and school staff. August 14, 2014 Preliminary visit Data files, VRQA folders. Discussion between External Reviewer and Leadership Team. School tour and meeting key Anna Kukuruzovic and leadership team with Hildebrand. August 14 to August 28, 2014 Analysis of data and information collected on the preliminary visit. Reviewer’s time and data analysis skills. VRQA detailed Gaell Hildebrand August 28, 2014 Peer review panel day SSE. Data files. Focus group of students. Panel input. Peer Review Panel and invited others. August 28 to September 16, 2014 Drafting of the review report and checking by the Principal. Reviewer’s time. Data analysis. Peer review panel day evidence. Gaell Hildebrand Anna Kukuruzovic September 16, 2014 Submission of finalised Peer Review Report. Quality Assurance processes completed via Monash University and DEECD. Gaell Hildebrand Monash University DEECD TBC Presentation to and School Council. Review Report. Time to prepare presentation. Anna Kukuruzovic and Assistant Principals
nevr_8743_ashwoodcollege_peer_review_report_final.docx