[OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 21 – March]: Same recommended resolution as Comment 14, except this addresses time rather than position. Recommend deleting UM 192. A5-2 16 FR Comment: Why not just use 28; same [Editors 21 Open – UM 28-192 comment at 15. CLIMB/DESCEND were required by FAA. Up to the group to decide. Suggested Change: Eliminate 1 message to reduce the size of the message set [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 21 – March]: Comment duplicated. See comment 15. Table A5-2 58 GS Is part of DCL? I question why free text is [Editors 21 Yes part of Closed – not used for this part of the clearance. That DCL. would make this element a candidate for deletion. [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 22 – March]: This is a PANS-ATM requirement, cannot delete. See comment 36-7. A5-2 36 AW 1. UM8R, UM10R: Suggest replacing 1 - [Editors 21 It is UM9 not 1 – – with in the message UM8R. Closed “descend” “descent” intent: Editor change proposal on EXPECT that a descent descend LEVEL Message Text: “Notification instruction may be issued at the specified position.” Note: time/position condition moved to first place (to be consistent with expect speed messages) UM7 AT TIME (time) EXPECT HIGHER LEVEL CLEARANCE
[OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 21 March]: Same recommended resolution as Comment 14, except this addresses time rather than position. Recommend deleting UM 192. A5-2 UM 28-192 16 FR Comment: Why not just use 28; same comment at 15. Suggested Change: Eliminate 1 message to reduce the size of the message set [Editors – 21 CLIMB/DESCEND were required by FAA. Up to the group to decide. [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 21 March]: Comment duplicated. See comment 15. Open Table A5-2 58 GS Is part of DCL? I question why free text is not used for this part of the clearance. That would make this element a candidate for deletion. [Editors – 21 Yes part of DCL. [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 22 March]: This is a PANS-ATM requirement, cannot delete. See comment 36-7. Closed A5-2 36 AW 1. UM8R, UM10R: Suggest replacing “descend” with “descent” in the message intent: “Notification that a descent descend instruction may be issued at the specified position.” 1 - [Editors – 21 It is UM9 not UM8R. Editor change proposal on EXPECT LEVEL Message Text: Note: time/position condition moved to first place (to be consistent with expect speed messages) UM7 AT TIME (time) EXPECT HIGHER LEVEL CLEARANCE 1 – Closed
OPLINKPWGWHL-4-APR.docx