490 2,401 1,119 1,689 526 English Learners 6,225 (6.4%) (31.5%) (14.7%) (22.1%) (6.9%) 19 19 17 9 2 Foster 66 (0.2%) (0.2%) (0.2%) (0.1%) (0.0%) 414 576 282 215 45 Homeless 1,532 (5.4%) (7.5%) (3.7%) (2.8%) (0.6%) Socioeconomically 1,109 2,789 1,718 1,400 264 7,280 Disadvantaged (14.5%) (36.5%) (22.5%) (18.3%) (3.5%) Students with 1,125 2,585 1,405 1,062 229 6,406 Disabilities (14.7%) (33.9%) (18.4%) (13.9%) (3.0%) *Total = Based on cumulative enrollment for students that met the eligibility criteria. Recommendation The CDE recommends that the SBE approve the proposed cut scores and performance levels for the Chronic Absenteeism Indicator. The CDE also recommends that the grid be applied to the Chronic Absenteeism Indicator for both the all students and student group levels, whenever there are fewer than 150 students.
English Learners 6,225 490 (6.4%) 2,401 (31.5%) 1,119 (14.7%) 1,689 (22.1%) 526 (6.9%) Foster 66 19 (0.2%) 19 (0.2%) 17 (0.2%) 9 (0.1%) 2 (0.0%) Homeless 1,532 414 (5.4%) 576 (7.5%) 282 (3.7%) 215 (2.8%) 45 (0.6%) Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 7,280 1,109 (14.5%) 2,789 (36.5%) 1,718 (22.5%) 1,400 (18.3%) 264 (3.5%) Students with Disabilities 6,406 1,125 (14.7%) 2,585 (33.9%) 1,405 (18.4%) 1,062 (13.9%) 229 (3.0%) *Total = Based on cumulative enrollment for students that met the eligibility criteria. Recommendation The CDE recommends that the SBE approve the proposed cut scores and performance levels for the Chronic Absenteeism Indicator. The CDE also recommends that the grid be applied to the Chronic Absenteeism Indicator for both the all students and student group levels, whenever there are fewer than 150 students.
nov18item04.docx