80% plus mark Excellent Very good A competent are The COMMUNICATION is awarded interpretation interpretation attempts to assignment 1. The assessment guidelines have been when work of assessment of the of the interpret the rigorously interpreted and followed satisfies all of criteria. assessment assessment little The portfolio addresses the the criteria criteria. guidelines. guidelines relevance to ‘A’ questions asked (i.e. the set in each section Writing is but some of the tasks or module learning to an highly Generally There are these are assessment outcomes) exceptional articulate and the writing clear attempts flawed. guidelines or Appropriate evidence of practice there is a is to provide a the area of is selected and included. demonstrating logical, articulate logical The It lacks Achievement of the module mastery of coherent and there structure but assignment structure and learning outcomes is complex and structure. is a logical there are some lacks a clear there is poor demonstrated. specialised flow of and logical use of knowledge Referencing information in the structure and language 2. Presentation and structure and is worthy technique is expressed approach due to poor including Structure is coherent and logical. of excellent. through a used. writing skills, several and Presentation and formatting of dissemination clear ideas and recurrent the portfolio follow module to a wider Word limit is Referencing concepts are grammatical guidance. audience. adhered to. structure. technique is not and syntax Sections and appendices are satisfactory. adequately errors. The appropriately and clearly Work is expressed. expression of labelled. accurately Word limit is meaning is adhered to. Does not very weak 3. References and citations maintain an and there are An approved method of accurate numerous referencing has been used both Word limit referencing referencing within the main text and in the is adhered technique. errors. reference list. to. References and citations are length. correctly and consistently length. formatted. 4. Writing is articulate and clear Correct spelling, grammar and syntax. Appropriate use of technical language. Variety in the way information is presented. 5. Word limit is adhered to
COMMUNICATION 1. The assessment guidelines have been rigorously interpreted and followed The portfolio addresses the questions asked (i.e. the set tasks or module learning outcomes) Appropriate evidence of practice is selected and included. Achievement of the module learning outcomes is demonstrated. 2. Presentation and structure Structure is coherent and logical. Presentation and formatting of the portfolio follow module guidance. Sections and appendices are appropriately and clearly labelled. 3. References and citations An approved method of referencing has been used both within the main text and in the reference list. References and citations are correctly and consistently formatted. 4. Writing is articulate and clear Correct spelling, grammar and syntax. Appropriate use of technical language. Variety in the way information is presented. 5. Word limit is adhered to 80% plus mark is awarded when work satisfies all of the ‘A’ criteria in each section to an exceptional demonstrating mastery of complex and specialised knowledge and is worthy of dissemination to a wider audience. Excellent interpretation of assessment criteria. Writing is highly articulate and there is a logical, coherent structure. Referencing technique is excellent. Word limit is adhered to. Very good of the criteria. Generally the writing is articulate and there is a logical flow of information expressed through a clear structure. Work is accurately Word limit is adhered to. A competent interpretation of the assessment guidelines. There are clear attempts to provide a logical structure but there are some in the approach used. Referencing technique is satisfactory. Word limit is adhered to. are attempts to interpret the assessment guidelines but some of these are flawed. The assignment lacks a clear and logical structure and due to poor writing skills, ideas and concepts are not adequately expressed. Does not maintain an accurate referencing technique. length. The assignment little relevance to the assessment guidelines or the area of It lacks structure and there is poor use of language including several and recurrent grammatical and syntax errors. The expression of meaning is very weak and there are numerous referencing errors. length.
module_guide.docx