Accepts as Future Work Tracking Number: RFC 007-B04 Rejects with Reasons Evaluator Submission RFC submission is a comment or question with no call for Candidate Standard modification Document Requirement Type Section Number Criticality Bernard Leclerc, Senior Technical Specialist, CAE, Montreal, Canada 16-009r1 T2DModel Tree Structure 6.2.2 Editorial RFC Comment as submitted by Evaluator OGC CDB SWG Response / Comment / Modifications / Reasons Discussed in SWG meeting; approved by unanimous consent The last sentence of the section is layer has an optional LOD node “Each followed by a fixed hierarchy of regular OpenFlight Object, Face, and Mesh nodes.” It is suggested to remove two words, fixed and regular, to simplify the sentence; especially if the above proposed changes are accepted. The resulting sentence would then be layer has an optional LOD node “Each followed by a hierarchy of OpenFlight Object, Face, and Mesh nodes.” [Document attached by Bernard to the RFC comment submission has been uploaded to the OGC CDB SWG files here: https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=68803] SWG RFC Resolution Categories Tracking Number: RFC 008-B01 X Accepts Evaluator Submission Accepts with Modifications Document Accepts as Future Work Rejects with Reasons RFC submission is a comment or question with no call for Candidate Standard modification Requirement Section Criticality Type Number David Graham, CAE Inc. Volume 9: schemas metadata/schemas Minor
Accepts as Future Work Rejects with Reasons RFC submission is a comment or question with no call for Candidate Standard modification Tracking Number: RFC 007-B04 Evaluator Submission Document Requirement Type Section Number Criticality Bernard Leclerc, Senior Technical Specialist, CAE, Montreal, Canada 16-009r1 T2DModel Tree Structure 6.2.2 Editorial RFC Comment as submitted by Evaluator OGC CDB SWG Response / Comment / Modifications / Reasons Discussed in SWG meeting; approved by unanimous consent The last sentence of the section is “Each layer has an optional LOD node followed by a fixed hierarchy of regular OpenFlight Object, Face, and Mesh nodes.” It is suggested to remove two words, fixed and regular, to simplify the sentence; especially if the above proposed changes are accepted. The resulting sentence would then be “Each layer has an optional LOD node followed by a hierarchy of OpenFlight Object, Face, and Mesh nodes.” [Document attached by Bernard to the RFC comment submission has been uploaded to the OGC CDB SWG files here: https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=68803] SWG RFC Resolution Categories X Accepts Accepts with Modifications Accepts as Future Work Rejects with Reasons RFC submission is a comment or question with no call for Candidate Standard modification Tracking Number: RFC 008-B01 Evaluator Submission Document Requirement Type Section Number Criticality David Graham, CAE Inc. Volume 9: schemas metadata/schemas Minor
16-112_OGC_CDB_V1_0_2016_RFC_Resolution_Document_as_approved_in_Dublin_SWG_meeting.docx