nationally on an ad-hoc basis Jepson J et al., Dietary Traditional, video or One moderate quality systematic This Lack of 2006 change: computer-based teaching review of study types (1&2+, A) evidence intervention Continued reducing the methods were successful at evaluated the effectiveness of may be intake of total increasing nutrition interventions to promote healthy implemented Interventions and saturated knowledge, and their eating in preschool children aged 1 locally in to promote fat, increasing effectiveness was enhanced to 5 years (Tedstone et al, 1998). some areas healthy eating the intake of by including parents. but does not in preschool fruit and However, there is insufficient children vegetables, evidence available to predict have a and increasing the format of successful consistent the intake of healthy eating interventions national fibre. that are likely to be effective programme or at improving the nutritional a co-ordinated well-being of UK pre-school approach children. Jepson J et al., Dietary The results of the One moderate quality SR of mixed This B. This intervention is 2006 change: revealed that these study types (1&2+, A) evaluated intervention supported by Continued reducing the kinds of interventions have a interventions to promote healthy may be moderate to intake of total small, but significant positive eating in order to evaluate the implemented good quality Interventions and saturated effect. Pooled estimates from barriers to, and facilitators of, evidence of its locally in to promote to fat, increasing the nineteen studies suggest healthy eating amongst children effectiveness some areas children aged the intake of that implementation of these aged four to 10 years old (Thomas but does not 4-10 fruit and interventions will, on average, et al, 2003). This review combined vegetables, increase children’s fruit intake both qualitative and quantitative have a and increasing by one-fifth of a portion per studies. The types of interventions consistent the intake of day and their vegetable evaluated by these studies were fibre. intake by a little less than largely school-based, and often
nationally on an ad-hoc basis Jepson J et al., 2006 Continued Interventions to promote healthy eating in preschool children Dietary change: reducing the intake of total and saturated fat, increasing the intake of fruit and vegetables, and increasing the intake of fibre. Traditional, video or computer-based teaching methods were successful at increasing nutrition knowledge, and their effectiveness was enhanced by including parents. However, there is insufficient evidence available to predict the format of successful healthy eating interventions that are likely to be effective at improving the nutritional well-being of UK pre-school children. One moderate quality systematic review of study types (1&2+, A) evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to promote healthy eating in preschool children aged 1 to 5 years (Tedstone et al, 1998). This intervention may be implemented locally in some areas but does not have a consistent national programme or a co-ordinated approach Lack of evidence Jepson J et al., 2006 Continued Interventions to promote to children aged 4-10 Dietary change: reducing the intake of total and saturated fat, increasing the intake of fruit and vegetables, and increasing the intake of fibre. The results of the revealed that these kinds of interventions have a small, but significant positive effect. Pooled estimates from the nineteen studies suggest that implementation of these interventions will, on average, increase children’s fruit intake by one-fifth of a portion per day and their vegetable intake by a little less than One moderate quality SR of mixed study types (1&2+, A) evaluated interventions to promote healthy eating in order to evaluate the barriers to, and facilitators of, healthy eating amongst children aged four to 10 years old (Thomas et al, 2003). This review combined both qualitative and quantitative studies. The types of interventions evaluated by these studies were largely school-based, and often This intervention may be implemented locally in some areas but does not have a consistent B. This intervention is supported by moderate to good quality evidence of its effectiveness
Nutrition%20Evidence%20Review%20Final.docx