/100 Outstanding Very good Good Fair + 80 % 79 60 % 59 40 % 39 20 % Evaluation Criteria – – – Structure of the Project Question: What are the stated objectives and learning outcomes? Is the learning activity long-term, and does it call on students to plan their work and assess their work over time? /04 4 3 2 1 Overview: Learning activities afford students the opportunity to acquire self-regulation skills (i.e. Students are expected to be able to work with minimal supervision, which requires them to plan their own work and monitor its quality). Design of Learning Environment Question: How is the learning planned? To what extent does the planning for learning facilitate the development of /8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 different dimensions of 21st century skills e.g. knowledge building, use of ICT for learning, problem-solving and innovation, self-regulation, collaboration and skilled communication.
Evaluation Criteria Outstanding + 80 % Very good 79 – 60 % Good 59 – 40 % Fair 39 – 20 % /100 Structure of the Project Question: What are the stated objectives and learning outcomes? Is the learning activity long-term, and does it call on students to plan their work and assess their work over time? Overview: Learning activities afford students the opportunity to acquire self-regulation skills (i.e. Students are expected to be able to work with minimal supervision, which requires them to plan their own work and monitor its quality). 4 3 2 1 /04 Design of Learning Environment Question: How is the learning planned? To what extent does the planning for learning facilitate the development of different dimensions of 21st century skills e.g. knowledge building, use of ICT for learning, problem-solving and innovation, self-regulation, collaboration and skilled communication. 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 /8
MSFT%20PiL%20Canada%20Innovative%20Teacher%20Award%20Application.docx