to identify effective and lessons learned for remediation measures and subsequent projects lessons learned for subsequent projects 6.2 Project and Program Evaluation Subsection Objectives: Review the organization’s ability to conduct objective internal evaluations of project strategies, approaches, outcomes and impacts or to organize, manage, and use external evaluations Resources: Project and program evaluation plans, evaluation tools, evaluation reports, staff and stakeholder surveys or interviews Low Capacity Basic Capacity Moderate Capacity Strong Capacity 1 2 3 4 6.2 Policies and procedures for Written policies and Written policies and procedures for Written policies and Project and evaluation are procedures for evaluation are evaluation are procedures for evaluation Program are Evaluation Not written Weak and require Adequate, but may require significant changes some updating Good Written, but not followed Not usually applied Usually applied Consistently applied The organization has The organization has The organization has The organization has Inadequate ability to prepare Adequate ability to prepare a Weak ability to prepare a Good ability to prepare a a scope of work for an scope of work for an evaluation scope of work for an scope of work for an evaluation of approaches, of approaches, performance, evaluation of approaches, evaluation of performance, and results and results performance, and results approaches, performance, and results Inadequate ability to provide Adequate ability to provide Weak ability to provide support and documentation support and documentation for support and Good ability to provide for evaluators evaluators documentation for support and evaluators documentation for Inadequate ability to review Adequate ability to review evaluators evaluation data quality and evaluation data quality and Weak ability to review reports reports evaluation data quality and Good ability to review reports evaluation data quality Inadequate ability to address Adequate ability to address and reports evaluation findings and evaluation findings and Weak ability to address recommendations in existing recommendations in existing and evaluation findings and Good ability to address and new projects new projects recommendations in evaluation findings and existing and new projects recommendations in
to identify effective remediation measures and lessons learned for subsequent projects and lessons learned for subsequent projects 6.2 Project and Program Evaluation Subsection Objectives: Review the organization’s ability to conduct objective internal evaluations of project strategies, approaches, outcomes and impacts or to organize, manage, and use external evaluations Resources: Project and program evaluation plans, evaluation tools, evaluation reports, staff and stakeholder surveys or interviews Low Capacity Basic Capacity Moderate Capacity Strong Capacity 6.2 Project and Program Evaluation 1 2 3 4 Policies and procedures for evaluation are Not written Written, but not followed The organization has Inadequate ability to prepare a scope of work for an evaluation of approaches, performance, and results Inadequate ability to provide support and documentation for evaluators Inadequate ability to review evaluation data quality and reports Inadequate ability to address evaluation findings and recommendations in existing and new projects Written policies and procedures for evaluation are Weak and require significant changes Not usually applied The organization has Weak ability to prepare a scope of work for an evaluation of approaches, performance, and results Weak ability to provide support and documentation for evaluators Weak ability to review evaluation data quality and reports Weak ability to address evaluation findings and recommendations in existing and new projects Written policies and procedures for evaluation are Adequate, but may require some updating Usually applied The organization has Adequate ability to prepare a scope of work for an evaluation of approaches, performance, and results Adequate ability to provide support and documentation for evaluators Adequate ability to review evaluation data quality and reports Adequate ability to address evaluation findings and recommendations in existing and new projects Written policies and procedures for evaluation are Good Consistently applied The organization has Good ability to prepare a scope of work for an evaluation of approaches, performance, and results Good ability to provide support and documentation for evaluators Good ability to review evaluation data quality and reports Good ability to address evaluation findings and recommendations in
ocawithoutfacilitatorsguidewithnupas_7.27.2015.docx