Met? Compliance Fishers are to There is a generally Some evidence exists high degree of thought to comply with the demonstrate fishers comply confidence that fishers management system for the with the management system comply with the management Guide fishery under assessment, under assessment, including, system under assessment, c post including, when required, when required, providing including, providing providing information of information of importance to information of importance to importance to the effective the effective management of the effective management of management of the fishery. the fishery. the fishery. Met? Systematic non-compliance Guide There is no evidence of d post systematic non-compliance. Met? Discussion References Likely Performance Indicator Level (e.g. <60, 60-79, ≥80) PI 3.2.4 Monitoring and management performance evaluation – There is a system of monitoring and evaluating the performance of the fishery-specific PI 3.2.4 management system against its objectives. is effective and timely review of the fishery-specific management system. Scoring Issue SG 60 SG 80 SG 100 Evaluation coverage There are mechanisms in There are mechanisms in There are mechanisms in Guide place to evaluate some parts place to evaluate key parts of place to evaluate all parts of a post of the fishery-specific the fishery-specific the fishery-specific management system. management system management system. Met?
Met? c Compliance Guide post Fishers are generally thought to comply with the management system for the fishery under assessment, including, when required, providing information of importance to the effective management of the fishery. Some evidence exists to demonstrate fishers comply with the management system under assessment, including, when required, providing information of importance to the effective management of the fishery. There is a high degree of confidence that fishers comply with the management system under assessment, including, providing information of importance to the effective management of the fishery. Met? d Systematic non-compliance Guide post There is no evidence of systematic non-compliance. Met? Discussion References Likely Performance Indicator Level (e.g. <60, 60-79, ≥80) PI 3.2.4 – Monitoring and management performance evaluation PI 3.2.4 There is a system of monitoring and evaluating the performance of the fishery-specific management system against its objectives. is effective and timely review of the fishery-specific management system. Scoring Issue SG 60 SG 80 SG 100 a Evaluation coverage Guide post There are mechanisms in place to evaluate some parts of the fishery-specific management system. There are mechanisms in place to evaluate key parts of the fishery-specific management system There are mechanisms in place to evaluate all parts of the fishery-specific management system. Met?
MSC_Client_Preparation_Assessment_Report_Template_v0.1.docx