Progress in increasing access Number of MEs who Analysis of MIS data and MIS to MED services (including used various services, progress reports Project reports finance)? under MEDEP and FGDs and interviews with Field notes of What progress has been MEDPA, NMEFEN, stakeholders MTE team made in enabling potential DMEGA, Financial and existing entrepreneurs Service Providers, to access MED services? Cooperatives Number of new Districts where services have become available Which MED services? Current portfolio of Review of project MIS services documents, strategies and Manuals on Has it been reviewed official guidelines on services and revised as planned, portfolio of MED Report on ‘official’ on the of a study? services review of What services are Interviews with various services actually being accessed types of service providers (compared to the FGDs with target groups portfolio)? “official” Is quality and inclusivity of % users from various Analysis of MIS Data MIS data the services (including vulnerable groups Review of Progress Reports Progress finance) being maintained (GESI indicators) and independent reports under MEDEP? Start-up rates reports (if Survival rates any) reports Sales/profits Interviews with project MTE field User satisfaction staff, service providers notes FGDs with target groups Is quality and inclusivity of % from various Analysis of MIS Data MIS services (including finance) vulnerable groups Review of Progress Reports Progress being maintained under (GESI indicators) and independent reports MEDPA? Start-up rates Assessment/study reports (if Survival rates any) reports (if Sales/profits Interviews with project any) User satisfaction staff, service providers Notes of MTE FGDs with target groups team from consultative meetings with MEDPA stakeholders
What progress has been made in enabling potential and existing entrepreneurs to access MED services? Progress in increasing access to MED services (including finance)? Number of MEs who used various services, under MEDEP and MEDPA, NMEFEN, DMEGA, Financial Service Providers, Cooperatives Number of new Districts where services have become available Analysis of MIS data and progress reports FGDs and interviews with stakeholders MIS Project reports Field notes of MTE team Which MED services? Current portfolio of services Has it been reviewed and revised as planned, on the of a study? What services are actually being accessed (compared to the “official” portfolio)? Review of project documents, strategies and official guidelines on ‘official’ portfolio of MED services Interviews with various types of service providers FGDs with target groups MIS Manuals on services Report on review of services Is quality and inclusivity of the services (including finance) being maintained under MEDEP? % users from various vulnerable groups (GESI indicators) Start-up rates Survival rates Sales/profits User satisfaction Analysis of MIS Data Review of Progress Reports and independent reports (if any) Interviews with project staff, service providers FGDs with target groups MIS data Progress reports reports MTE field notes Is quality and inclusivity of services (including finance) being maintained under MEDPA? % from various vulnerable groups (GESI indicators) Start-up rates Survival rates Sales/profits User satisfaction Analysis of MIS Data Review of Progress Reports and independent Assessment/study reports (if any) Interviews with project staff, service providers FGDs with target groups MIS Progress reports reports (if any) Notes of MTE team from consultative meetings with MEDPA stakeholders
nepal-micro-enterprise-development-programme-medep-mid-term-evaluation-report.docx