measures/partial strategy is strategy/strategy is being being implemented implemented successfully successfully. and is achieving its objective, as outlined in scoring issue (a). Met? Compliance with management requirements and MSC UoAs’/non-MSC fisheries’ measures to protect VMEs There is qualitative is some quantitative There is clear quantitative evidence that the UoA evidence that the UoA evidence that the UoA complies with its complies with both its complies with both its d Guide management requirements to management requirements management requirements post protect VMEs. and with protection measures and with protection measures afforded to VMEs by other afforded to VMEs by other MSC UoAs/non-MSC MSC UoAs/non-MSC fisheries, where relevant. fisheries, where relevant. Met? Discussion References Likely Performance Indicator Level (e.g. <60, 60-79, ≥80) PI 2.4.3 Habitats information – Information is adequate to determine the risk posed to the habitat by the UoA and the PI 2.4.3 effectiveness of the strategy to manage impacts on the habitat. Scoring Issue SG 60 SG 80 SG 100 Information quality The types and distribution of The nature, distribution and The distribution of all habitats the main habitats are broadly vulnerability of the main is known over their range, understood. habitats in the UoA area are with particular attention to the a Guide known at a level of detail occurrence of vulnerable post OR relevant to the scale and habitats. intensity of the UoA. If CSA is used to score PI 2.4.1 for the UoA: OR
measures/partial strategy is being implemented successfully. strategy/strategy is being implemented successfully and is achieving its objective, as outlined in scoring issue (a). Met? d Compliance with management requirements and MSC UoAs’/non-MSC fisheries’ measures to protect VMEs Guide post There is qualitative evidence that the UoA complies with its management requirements to protect VMEs. is some quantitative evidence that the UoA complies with both its management requirements and with protection measures afforded to VMEs by other MSC UoAs/non-MSC fisheries, where relevant. There is clear quantitative evidence that the UoA complies with both its management requirements and with protection measures afforded to VMEs by other MSC UoAs/non-MSC fisheries, where relevant. Met? Discussion References Likely Performance Indicator Level (e.g. <60, 60-79, ≥80) PI 2.4.3 – Habitats information PI 2.4.3 Information is adequate to determine the risk posed to the habitat by the UoA and the effectiveness of the strategy to manage impacts on the habitat. Scoring Issue SG 60 SG 80 SG 100 a Information quality Guide post The types and distribution of the main habitats are broadly understood. OR If CSA is used to score PI 2.4.1 for the UoA: The nature, distribution and vulnerability of the main habitats in the UoA area are known at a level of detail relevant to the scale and intensity of the UoA. OR The distribution of all habitats is known over their range, with particular attention to the occurrence of vulnerable habitats.
MSC_Client_Preparation_Assessment_Report_Template_v0.1.docx