Other agencies hire of the space which helps support the objectives of the charity which is of benefit to the community as a whole. Who will lose if the usage ceases? All of the groups and the agencies use or hire the space at 67 Queens Road. The wider community that feels the benefits from the work that takes place at Community at 67. Evidence gained from relevant sources (owner, Ward member, None Parish Council, B&NES Council) Enter score out of 25 and 25 rationale The Annual Report and Contitution for Community at 67 and Application Evidence provided by indicates that there is no evidence that nominee the usage is actively discouraged by the Council’s Policy and Budget C2. Is any aspect of framework the usage actively None discouraged by the Evidence gained from other relevant sources Council’s Policy and (owner, Ward member, Budget Framework? Parish Council, B&NES Council) Enter score out of 25 and 25 rationale The Nomination includes the following: C3. Why is the The users of the centre are local and Evidence provided by seen as having predominantly situated in an area nominee social value in the where this resource provides valuable support to a community that sits in the context of the most disadvantaged Ward in community on Keynsham. whose behalf the Support received from the B&NES Evidence gained from nomination is being Councillor for Keynsham relevant sources made? (owner, Ward member, would wish to whole heartedly “I Parish Council, B&NES support their application. Council)
Other agencies hire of the space which helps support the objectives of the charity which is of benefit to the community as a whole. Who will lose if the usage ceases? All of the groups and the agencies use or hire the space at 67 Queens Road. The wider community that feels the benefits from the work that takes place at Community at 67. Evidence gained from relevant sources (owner, Ward member, Parish Council, B&NES Council) None Enter score out of 25 and rationale 25 C2. Is any aspect of the usage actively discouraged by the Council’s Policy and Budget Framework? Evidence provided by nominee The Annual Report and Contitution for Community at 67 and Application indicates that there is no evidence that the usage is actively discouraged by the Council’s Policy and Budget framework Evidence gained from other relevant sources (owner, Ward member, Parish Council, B&NES Council) None Enter score out of 25 and rationale 25 C3. Why is the seen as having social value in the context of the community on whose behalf the nomination is being made? Evidence provided by nominee The Nomination includes the following: The users of the centre are local and predominantly situated in an area where this resource provides valuable support to a community that sits in the most disadvantaged Ward in Keynsham. Evidence gained from relevant sources (owner, Ward member, Parish Council, B&NES Council) Support received from the B&NES Councillor for Keynsham “I would wish to whole heartedly support their application.
notice_under_section_91_of_the_localism_act_2011-_community_at_67_queens_road_26_march_2018.docx