Was this as planned, timely? Does this constitute a move from implementation to facilitation? What have been the How can the challenges be Consideration of Consultative meetings ToC workshop challenges and causes of overcome? assumptions, influencing with project All interviews over or achievement? factors, unintended effects stakeholders at central, in Theory of Change regional and district Views of those concerned level Component 3. Micro Enterprise Association deliver sustainable services to members such as access to markets, finance, technology and advocacy How has the project Are NMEFEN, DMEGA Service portfolio Project staff MIS contributed towards creating increasingly offering Number of Districts where presentations and Project and strengthening MEs services? services are being offered interviews records on groups and associations for How effective are the Number of staff involved NMEFEN, DMEGA training, effective MED services? Associations? What is done to promote the records reports services? Interviews with NMEFEN, DMEGA FGDs with MEs Are the services offered of % of staff experienced Interviews with NMEFEN and good quality and inclusive in/trained on MED NMEFEN, DMEGA Inclusiveness of staff individual service records involved (GESI indicators) providers Are NMEFEN, DMEGA Number of advocacy Interviews with MIS increasingly undertaking initiatives, total and by NMEFEN, DMEGA Interviews quality advocacy initiatives? District Interviews at National with project % that is based on research and District level with staff and/or consultations with participants in dialogue NMEFEN, members DMEGA % that has resulted in records improved regulation, procedures, budget allocations Are services commercially % of cost-recovery Interviews with MIS viable and independent of Technical support provided NMEFEN, Interviews technical support? Increase in demand with project staff NMEFEN, records
Was this as planned, timely? Does this constitute a move from implementation to facilitation? What have been the challenges and causes of over or achievement? How can the challenges be overcome? Consideration of assumptions, influencing factors, unintended effects in Theory of Change Views of those concerned Consultative meetings with project stakeholders at central, regional and district level ToC workshop All interviews Component 3. Micro Enterprise Association deliver sustainable services to members such as access to markets, finance, technology and advocacy How has the project contributed towards creating and strengthening MEs groups and associations for effective MED services? Are NMEFEN, DMEGA increasingly offering services? How effective are the Associations? Service portfolio Number of Districts where services are being offered Number of staff involved What is done to promote the services? Project staff presentations and interviews NMEFEN, DMEGA records Interviews with NMEFEN, DMEGA FGDs with MEs MIS Project records on training, reports Are the services offered of good quality and inclusive % of staff experienced in/trained on MED Inclusiveness of staff involved (GESI indicators) Interviews with NMEFEN, individual service providers NMEFEN and DMEGA records Are NMEFEN, DMEGA increasingly undertaking quality advocacy initiatives? Number of advocacy initiatives, total and by District % that is based on research and/or consultations with members % that has resulted in improved regulation, procedures, budget allocations Interviews with NMEFEN, DMEGA Interviews at National and District level with participants in dialogue MIS Interviews with project staff NMEFEN, DMEGA records Are services commercially viable and independent of technical support? % of cost-recovery Technical support provided Increase in demand Interviews with NMEFEN, MIS Interviews with project staff NMEFEN, records
nepal-micro-enterprise-development-programme-medep-mid-term-evaluation-report.docx