Percent Total Revenue Change 9.08% 13.30% 19.35% -3.31% 0.00% 0.00% Proposed Rate of Return 8.24% 6.13% 6.12% 17.30% 14.50% 18.91% Proposed Relative Rate of 100% 75% 74% 210% 176% 230% Return Current Rate of Return 3.75% -0.54% -0.59% 23.23% 16.20% 21.02% Current Relative Rate of Return 100% -14% -16% 619% 431% 560% UGI Exhibit D-Cost of Service Study (REBUTTAL) at 6-7; UGI M.B. at 148. Additionally, UGI explained that its final proposed revenue requirement increase of $7.705 million, inclusive of all adjustments resulting from the Company’s Rejoinder Testimony, should be allocated according to the same principles and in the same manner set forth in the above table. UGI M.B. at 148, n.30. I&E asserted that rather than merely focusing on the overall rate increase, gradualism and rate shock must be considered for individual components of a customer’s bill, and the customer charge in particular. Therefore, I&E requested that the Commission apply the concept of gradualism when making a final allocation in this proceeding. I&E M.B. at 76-77. The OCA presented an alternative revenue allocation proposal based on its own ACOSS and argued that it should be adopted in lieu of the one proposed by UGI. The OCA submitted that is proposed revenue allocation is appropriate because it reflects
Percent Total Revenue Change 9.08% 13.30% 19.35% -3.31% 0.00% 0.00% Proposed Rate of Return 8.24% 6.13% 6.12% 17.30% 14.50% 18.91% Proposed Relative Rate of Return 100% 75% 74% 210% 176% 230% Current Rate of Return 3.75% -0.54% -0.59% 23.23% 16.20% 21.02% Current Relative Rate of Return 100% -14% -16% 619% 431% 560% UGI Exhibit D-Cost of Service Study (REBUTTAL) at 6-7; UGI M.B. at 148. Additionally, UGI explained that its final proposed revenue requirement increase of $7.705 million, inclusive of all adjustments resulting from the Company’s Rejoinder Testimony, should be allocated according to the same principles and in the same manner set forth in the above table. UGI M.B. at 148, n.30. I&E asserted that rather than merely focusing on the overall rate increase, gradualism and rate shock must be considered for individual components of a customer’s bill, and the customer charge in particular. Therefore, I&E requested that the Commission apply the concept of gradualism when making a final allocation in this proceeding. I&E M.B. at 76-77. The OCA presented an alternative revenue allocation proposal based on its own ACOSS and argued that it should be adopted in lieu of the one proposed by UGI. The OCA submitted that is proposed revenue allocation is appropriate because it reflects
1591254.docx