Submissions must contain relevant supporting and corroborating evidence within the submission to allow judges to evaluate the claims made in the narrative. Judges will evaluate the performance of the Individual over a period of years NOT the project or projects specifically In evaluating submissions, all judging panels will use a standard template. The standard template will include the following aspects of each criteria. Senior / Junior Category OPM Awards Project Complexity (30% of overall) – To what extent has the candidate managed projects based on the types and scale? Has the context of the works performed by the candidate in the nominated project been demonstrated in the write-up? Project Management Experience and Scope and Knowledge upgrading/ relevancy (25% of overall) – How many years has the candidate been involved in the role of a PM? To what extent does the write up provide evidence that the individual has been involved in the respective stages of the project? To what extent has the candidate performed across the spectrum of the PM Scope? Has the candidate sought continuous learning and certification to keep him/herself relevant to the changing landscape of the construction industry? Write Up (30% of overall) – Interview (15% of overall) Performance of the individual during the interview? 3.2 AWARDS All award winners will each be given a free 1-year SPM membership inclusive of the one-time entrance fee.
Submissions must contain relevant supporting and corroborating evidence within the submission to allow judges to evaluate the claims made in the narrative. Judges will evaluate the performance of the Individual over a period of years NOT the project or projects specifically In evaluating submissions, all judging panels will use a standard template. The standard template will include the following aspects of each criteria. Senior / Junior Category OPM Awards Project Complexity (30% of overall) – To what extent has the candidate managed projects based on the types and scale? Has the context of the works performed by the candidate in the nominated project been demonstrated in the write-up? Project Management Experience and Scope and Knowledge upgrading/ relevancy (25% of overall) – How many years has the candidate been involved in the role of a PM? To what extent does the write up provide evidence that the individual has been involved in the respective stages of the project? To what extent has the candidate performed across the spectrum of the PM Scope? Has the candidate sought continuous learning and certification to keep him/herself relevant to the changing landscape of the construction industry? Write – Up (30% of overall) Interview (15% of overall) Performance of the individual during the interview? 3.2 AWARDS All award winners will each be given a free 1-year SPM membership inclusive of the one-time entrance fee.
OPM%202018%20-%20Awards%20Submission%20Guidelines.docx