1. Has an agreement been reached among the SHPO or THPO, ACHP, and FHWA through the Section 106 process of the NHPA and 36 CFR 800 on measures to minimize harm and have those measures been incorporated into the project? SHPO/THPO ACHP FHWA Division Representative COORDINATION YES NO 1. Has the proposed project been coordinated with the Federal, State, and/or local officials having jurisdiction over the Section 4(f) lands and concurrence in writing been given? List all applicable officials: 2. For historic sites encumbered with Federal interests, has coordination with the official with jurisdiction occurred and concurrence in writing been given? 3. Does the proposed project require an individual bridge permit from the US Coast Guard and has coordination occurred? APPROVAL PROCEDURE YES NO This programmatic Section 4(f) approval applies only after the FHWA Division Representative has: 1. Determined that the project meets the applicability criteria set forth above; 2. Determined that all of the alternatives set forth in the Findings section have been fully evaluated; 3. Determined that the findings in this document (which conclude that the alternative recommended is the only feasible and prudent alternative) are clearly applicable to the project; 4. Determined that the project complies with the Measures to Minimize Harm section of this document; 5. Determined that the coordination called for in this programmatic evaluation has been successfully completed; 6. Assured that the measures to minimize harm will be incorporated into the project; and
1. Has an agreement been reached among the SHPO or THPO, ACHP, and FHWA through the Section 106 process of the NHPA and 36 CFR 800 on measures to minimize harm and have those measures been incorporated into the project? SHPO/THPO ACHP FHWA Division Representative COORDINATION YES NO 1. Has the proposed project been coordinated with the Federal, State, and/or local officials having jurisdiction over the Section 4(f) lands and concurrence in writing been given? List all applicable officials: 2. For historic sites encumbered with Federal interests, has coordination with the official with jurisdiction occurred and concurrence in writing been given? 3. Does the proposed project require an individual bridge permit from the US Coast Guard and has coordination occurred? APPROVAL PROCEDURE YES NO This programmatic Section 4(f) approval applies only after the FHWA Division Representative has: 1. Determined that the project meets the applicability criteria set forth above; 2. Determined that all of the alternatives set forth in the Findings section have been fully evaluated; 3. Determined that the findings in this document (which conclude that the alternative recommended is the only feasible and prudent alternative) are clearly applicable to the project; 4. Determined that the project complies with the Measures to Minimize Harm section of this document; 5. Determined that the coordination called for in this programmatic evaluation has been successfully completed; 6. Assured that the measures to minimize harm will be incorporated into the project; and
Nationwide%20Section%204(f)%20Evaluation%20for%20Independent%20Bikeway%20or%20Walkway%20Construction.docx