Student Name Date Cooperating Teacher School University Supervisor Semester Evaluator TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM CLEMSON UNIVERSITY – ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIO EVALUATION X Please place an in the box next to the rubric that best describes your student teacher’s performance for this portion of the portfolio evaluation. Please also enter the score awarded for each portfolio item evaluated. Artifact Representation of ADEPT Standards Items chosen to support standards were adequate. Most items selected were appropriate with evidence of creativity. 2 points chosen to support standards were appropriate and reflected uniqueness and creativity. 3 points Items not included for all standards or items chosen to support standards were inappropriate, or were one dimensional; with little or no evidence of creativity. 1 point Portfolio Organization and Writing Quality Portfolio showed excellent continuity and organization, exactness, and clarity of thought with evidence of originality and creativity. No errors were present. 3 points Evidence Portfolio Overall portfolio showed of Reflection material continuity poorly and and Self- organization. organized, Evaluation: numerous Errors, Written if errors present, Portfolio in grammar are few and and do spelling. not detract 1 point from the reader’s overall impression of the portfolio or the content of writing and reflective thought. 2 points Evidence of Reflection and Self- Evaluation: Written Portfolio Very little or no evidence of reflection and self-evaluation was present on the standards and/or revealed little or no awareness of integration standards; awareness of present development as a caring, capable, connected professional was limited; and no awareness of needs for future personal growth. 2 point
Student Name Date Cooperating Teacher School University Supervisor Semester Evaluator TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM – CLEMSON UNIVERSITY ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIO EVALUATION Please place an X in the box next to the rubric that best describes your student teacher’s performance for this portion of the portfolio evaluation. Please also enter the score awarded for each portfolio item evaluated. Artifact Representation of ADEPT Standards Items not included for all standards or items chosen to support standards were inappropriate, or were one dimensional; with little or no evidence of creativity. 1 point Items chosen to support standards were adequate. Most items selected were appropriate with evidence of creativity. 2 points chosen to support standards were appropriate and reflected uniqueness and creativity. 3 points Portfolio Organization and Writing Quality Overall portfolio material poorly organized, numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 1 point Portfolio showed continuity and organization. Errors, if present, are few and do not detract from the reader’s overall impression of the portfolio or the content of writing and reflective thought. 2 points Portfolio showed excellent continuity and organization, exactness, and clarity of thought with evidence of originality and creativity. No errors were present. 3 points Evidence of Reflection and Self- Evaluation: Written Portfolio Evidence of Reflection and Self- Evaluation: Written Portfolio Very little or no evidence of reflection and self-evaluation was present on the standards and/or revealed little or no awareness of integration standards; awareness of present development as a caring, capable, connected professional was limited; and no awareness of needs for future personal growth. 2 point
newportfolioform.docx