STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY FORM AY 2016-2017 Degree and Program Name: Submitted By: Please use size 10 font or larger. PART ONE What are the learning How, where, and when are they What are the expectations? What are the results? Committee/ person objectives? assessed? responsible? How are results shared? 1. Apply accepted research Graduate theses, Graduate recital Rubrics for graduate Recital AY 16-17 Three students The graduate examining – practices to the study of analyses (Performance Analyses and Theses with the submitted Recital Analysis committee formed for each Music. concentration only), written and percentage of students papers or Theses; Four students student performs the oral comprehensive exams expected to be at each level in took Comprehensive evaluations and reports evaluated by graduate faculty on parentheses: (Theses must be Examinations; Three students results to the Graduate graduate examination committees; at the superior level in order held Oral Examinations. Two Coordinator. In AY 16-17 exit interviews conducted upon to pass) Superior (50%), Recital Analyses in the the exit survey was completion of the program; Good (50%), Developing category; One Recital distributed anonymously Superior Classwork: grades from MUS (0%), Not Acceptable (0%); Analyses in the category. and electronically. The Good 5100 (Introduction to Research in [Students writing a Thesis One Recital Analysis received Graduate Coordinator Music) and MUS 5880 (Seminar must achieve a on Deferred Credit in May 2017. evaluates the data and Superior in Music History) our evaluation rubric–16/16 AY 16-17 Written and oral reports to the Chair and points–in order to receive comprehensive examinations: Graduate Committee (GC). Superior ranking; Students Four out of four students Graduate Coordinator giving a Graduate Recital plus achieved Pass or Conditional compiles results and Recital Analysis paper must Pass on the Written Exam (the distributes to Graduate achieve a or better on two that received Conditional Faculty. Good our evaluation rubric– min. Pass on a question submitted The Graduate Coordinator 12/16–in order to receive a the necessary paper to qualify and Graduate Committee Good ranking. If a Recital for a Pass) and three out of are responsible for making Analysis paper achieves a three students passed the Oral any consequent 16/16, that paper is treated as Exam. One student has not yet modifications to the a Thesis and deposited.] taken the Oral Comprehensive assessment process and for Exam and will take it following formulating any
STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY FORM AY 2016-2017 Degree and Program Name: Submitted By: Please use size 10 font or larger. PART ONE What are the learning objectives? How, where, and when are they assessed? What are the expectations? What are the results? Committee/ person responsible? How are results shared? 1. Apply accepted research practices to the study of Music. Graduate theses, Graduate recital analyses (Performance concentration only), written and oral comprehensive exams evaluated by graduate faculty on graduate examination committees; exit interviews conducted upon completion of the program; Classwork: grades from MUS 5100 (Introduction to Research in Music) and MUS 5880 (Seminar in Music History) Rubrics for graduate Recital Analyses and Theses with the percentage of students expected to be at each level in parentheses: (Theses must be at the superior level in order to pass) Superior (50%), Good (50%), Developing (0%), Not Acceptable (0%); [Students writing a Thesis must achieve a Superior on our evaluation rubric–16/16 points–in order to receive Superior ranking; Students giving a Graduate Recital plus Recital Analysis paper must achieve a Good or better on our evaluation rubric– min. 12/16–in order to receive a Good ranking. If a Recital Analysis paper achieves a 16/16, that paper is treated as a Thesis and deposited.] AY 16-17 – Three students submitted Recital Analysis papers or Theses; Four students took Comprehensive Examinations; Three students held Oral Examinations. Two Recital Analyses in the Superior category; One Recital Analyses in the Good category. One Recital Analysis received Deferred Credit in May 2017. AY 16-17 Written and oral comprehensive examinations: Four out of four students achieved Pass or Conditional Pass on the Written Exam (the two that received Conditional Pass on a question submitted the necessary paper to qualify for a Pass) and three out of three students passed the Oral Exam. One student has not yet taken the Oral Comprehensive Exam and will take it following The graduate examining committee formed for each student performs the evaluations and reports results to the Graduate Coordinator. In AY 16-17 the exit survey was distributed anonymously and electronically. The Graduate Coordinator evaluates the data and reports to the Chair and Graduate Committee (GC). Graduate Coordinator compiles results and distributes to Graduate Faculty. The Graduate Coordinator and Graduate Committee are responsible for making any consequent modifications to the assessment process and for formulating any
Mus%20ma%2017.docx