Output C1.1.1: Ecological Policy guidelines for Existing DCSG document Revised and approved Existing and revised DCSG Risk of competing land considerations integrated incorporating ecological does not cater for DCSG document with document Technical use, private into planning policies and considerations into Land ecological considerations; ecological requirements reports; Government / ownership resistance, regulations for Use and Development Some Government The Physical Planning national policy documents. acceptance of zoning development categories Policy policies incorporate Dept. & the DCA species and landscape evaluates planning protection applications from a considerations; Current multidimensional land Use Policy does not perspective, including integrated ecological ecological considerations considerations; No legislation on land use Output C1.1.2: Land Use Land Use Plan; electronic Existence of NE Quadrant Formulation of local and Completed land use plan Existence of NE Plan for NE Coast/Iyanola, inventory of ecosystem plan; No local Land Use integrated land use plan; document and strategy Quadrant plan, low incorporating valuation of goods and services and Plan exist for NE Coast; Land Use Plan adopted by map; Technical Reports priority status, ecosystem goods and biodiv in NE Coast no inventory of Cabinet (end-of-project and documents, financial constraints services ecosystem goods & target) databases/ electronic and acceptance services and biodiv in NE documentation - Coast videography Output C1.1.3: Enhanced Training opportunities and Limited awareness of At least 3 major planning Technical and training Risk of low awareness, capacity of national and sensitization meetings/ ecosystem services decisions which consider reports; recognition lack of local leaders to uptake workshops and seminars valuation. ecosystem services values publications/presentations technical and financial ecosystem services values Number of trainees and are documented. support and assuming considerations in planning. weeks training; Limited qualitative and priority acceptance by in decision making conservation techniques quantitative capacity and A cadre of practitioners authorities employed; tools and specialized knowledge with the requisite techniques for mapping and expertise; capacity - trainees, and valuing ecosystem increased capacity and services. Awareness increased levels of Surveys. integration; At least one exchange with overseas agency; Develop Component 2 Outputs Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification
Output C1.1.1: Ecological considerations integrated into planning policies and regulations for development categories Policy guidelines for incorporating ecological considerations into Land Use and Development Policy Existing DCSG document does not cater for ecological considerations; Some Government policies incorporate species and landscape protection considerations; Current land Use Policy does not integrated ecological considerations; No legislation on land use Revised and approved DCSG document with ecological requirements The Physical Planning Dept. & the DCA evaluates planning applications from a multidimensional perspective, including ecological considerations Existing and revised DCSG document Technical reports; Government / national policy documents. Risk of competing land use, private ownership resistance, acceptance of zoning Output C1.1.2: Land Use Plan for NE Coast/Iyanola, incorporating valuation of ecosystem goods and services Land Use Plan; electronic inventory of ecosystem goods and services and biodiv in NE Coast Existence of NE Quadrant plan; No local Land Use Plan exist for NE Coast; no inventory of ecosystem goods & services and biodiv in NE Coast Formulation of local and integrated land use plan; Land Use Plan adopted by Cabinet (end-of-project target) Completed land use plan document and strategy map; Technical Reports and documents, databases/ electronic documentation - videography Existence of NE Quadrant plan, low priority status, financial constraints and acceptance Output C1.1.3: Enhanced capacity of national and local leaders to uptake ecosystem services values considerations in planning. in decision making Training opportunities and sensitization meetings/ workshops and seminars Number of trainees and weeks training; conservation techniques employed; tools and techniques for mapping and valuing ecosystem services. Awareness Surveys. Limited awareness of ecosystem services valuation. Limited qualitative and quantitative capacity and specialized knowledge and expertise; At least 3 major planning decisions which consider ecosystem services values are documented. A cadre of practitioners with the requisite capacity - trainees, increased capacity and increased levels of integration; At least one exchange with overseas agency; Technical and training reports; publications/presentations Risk of low awareness, recognition lack of technical and financial support and assuming priority acceptance by authorities Develop Component 2 Outputs Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification