THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Complaint No. 13/2017 – Quorum Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman Shri S.K Agarwal, Member In the matter of: Sub: Petition under section 142 of the Electricity Act 2003. Shri Manoj Kumar s/o Shri Shivprasad, Village & Post Diravati, Tahsheel Knoch, – – Urai. …….. Petitioner Verus Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division I, Urai. – Respondent …….. ORDER on 19/09/2017) (Hearing The CGRF referred a complaint before the Commission under section 14 of UPERC (Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum & Electricity Ombudsman) Regulation 2007 and whereas the Commission initiates the proceeding in the matter under section 142 for non compliance of Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum order dated 18/04/2017 in appeal no. 149/2017. The operative part of the order dated 08/04/2017 is reproduced below: CGRF’s fnukafdr 17-01-2017 }kjk dks vkns”k ikfjr djrs gq, vf/k”kklh vfHk;Urk] fo|qr forj.k [k.M&izFke] mjbZ dks Fkk fd miHkksDrk ds fcy 1 fd0ok0 funsZf”kr fd;k Hkkj rFkk ehVj jhfMax ds vk/kkj ij fcuk ljpktZ ds miHkksDrk dks la”kksf/kr dj miyC/k dj;sa o fnukad 17-02-2017 rd Qksje dks vuqikyu vk[;k izLrqr djsaA The Commission issued notice to the parties. The Petitioner was absent. The Respondent was represented by his counsel Shri A.S. Rakhra.
THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Complaint No. – 13/2017 Quorum Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman Shri S.K Agarwal, Member In the matter of: Sub: Petition under section 142 of the Electricity Act 2003. Shri Manoj Kumar s/o Shri Shivprasad, Village & Post – Diravati, Tahsheel – Knoch, Urai. …….. Petitioner Verus Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division – I, Urai. …….. Respondent ORDER (Hearing on 19/09/2017) The CGRF referred a complaint before the Commission under section 14 of UPERC (Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum & Electricity Ombudsman) Regulation 2007 and whereas the Commission initiates the proceeding in the matter under section 142 for non compliance of Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum order dated 18/04/2017 in appeal no. 149/2017. The operative part of the CGRF’s order dated 08/04/2017 is reproduced below: fnukafdr 17-01-2017 }kjk dks vkns”k ikfjr djrs gq, vf/k”kklh vfHk;Urk] fo|qr forj.k [k.M&izFke] mjbZ dks funsZf”kr fd;k Fkk fd miHkksDrk ds fcy 1 fd0ok0 Hkkj rFkk ehVj jhfMax ds vk/kkj ij fcuk ljpktZ ds la”kksf/kr dj miHkksDrk dks miyC/k dj;sa o fnukad 17-02-2017 rd Qksje dks vuqikyu vk[;k izLrqr djsaA The Commission issued notice to the parties. The Petitioner was absent. The Respondent was represented by his counsel Shri A.S. Rakhra.