Have potential indicators been In policy recommendations for , pp. 27 – 32; 115 - 121 identified for each management Watershed Stewardship the LATT measure to determine success? Report identifies qualitative benchmarks to note success or failure in improving watershed conditions, and the implementation timeline repeatedly underlines the need for water quality data to verify the restoration of supportive biological habitat conditions Has it been roughly quantified how The project atlas features a STEPL , pp. 39 – 44 (table); 46 – 111 (profiles). much each management measure will report for each project that quantifies reduce one or more parameters reductions in total nitrogen, total identified in Element 1? phosphorous, biological oxygen demands, and total suspended solids. Reductions in all of these pollutants will improve local and regional water quality conditions. What has not been measured are reductions in runoff volume, which is thought to be a primary stressor in Little Alamance Creek. It can be indirectly measured from these efforts, though. There is a summary of these benefits in Table 4 (pp. 39 – 44), and a profile on each project’s description OPTIONAL (Supplemental and/or supporting information) Has a water quality, watershed or lake Yes, as part of the Jordan Lake Rules response model been developed for and its ongoing watershed modeling this watershed? Estimate of the technical and Yes No Notes Identify location of information (include link or financial assistance needed attach plan and identify section and page number REQUIRED (This box(es) below must be checked Yes in order to be eligible as a 9 Element plan) Have the potential costs associated The LATT Watershed Report & Plan’s ; pp. 39 – 44
Have potential indicators been identified for each management measure to determine success? In policy recommendations for Watershed Stewardship the LATT Report identifies qualitative benchmarks to note success or failure in improving watershed conditions, and the implementation timeline repeatedly underlines the need for water quality data to verify the restoration of supportive biological habitat conditions , pp. 27 – 32; 115 - 121 Has it been roughly quantified how much each management measure will reduce one or more parameters identified in Element 1? The project atlas features a STEPL report for each project that quantifies reductions in total nitrogen, total phosphorous, biological oxygen demands, and total suspended solids. Reductions in all of these pollutants will improve local and regional water quality conditions. What has not been measured are reductions in runoff volume, which is thought to be a primary stressor in Little Alamance Creek. It can be indirectly measured from these efforts, though. There is a summary of these benefits in Table 4 (pp. 39 – 44), and a profile on each project’s description , pp. 39 – 44 (table); 46 – 111 (profiles). OPTIONAL (Supplemental and/or supporting information) Has a water quality, watershed or lake response model been developed for this watershed? Yes, as part of the Jordan Lake Rules and its ongoing watershed modeling Estimate of the technical and financial assistance needed Yes No Notes Identify location of information (include link or attach plan and identify section and page number REQUIRED (This box(es) below must be checked Yes in order to be eligible as a 9 Element plan) Have the potential costs associated The LATT Watershed Report & Plan’s ; pp. 39 – 44