Santa Rosa County District Schools District Leader Evaluation Plan District Office Core Practice #1: Getting Results FLORIDA SANTA ROSA How does your district office evaluation system communicate, monitor, and evaluate expectations for the following: DISTRICT FLORIDA SCHOOL FLORIDA EDUCATOR DISTRICT RESEARCH RTTT MOU ADMINISTRATOR LEADER STATUTES ACCOMPLISHED LEADER CORE CORE PRACTICE ASSESSMENT PRACTICES PRACTICE Improving student SREB p. 2, Strategy 3 – MOU (D) (2) Statute 1012.98 FSLA Domain 1 – FEAPs 1-6 Core Practice # 1 achievement by Provide instructional Improving teacher School Indicator 1.4 focusing on coherence and support. and principal community Academic Standards leadership DM pp. 7, 17, 18, 25 effectiveness based professional behaviors that LET p. 4 #1 – District on performance (ii) development act FSLA Domain 2 – influence the leaders have a shared bullet Indicator 3.6 Faculty desired student agreement on #4 pp. 13-14 Statue 1012.985 Effectiveness results. instructional leadership. Regional LET p. 4 #3 – A shared professional understanding of development instructional leadership academies drives day-to-day work. LET p. 5 #5 – A shared Statute 1012.986 understanding of William Cecil instructional leadership Golden Professional drives evaluation. Development LET p. 5 #7 – Program for School District/Charter Leaders. management organization and school leaders’ focus on continuous improvement in their practice. HON, pp. vi & ix ROB pp. 635-669
Santa Rosa County District Schools District Leader Evaluation Plan District Office Core Practice #1: Getting Results How does your district office evaluation system communicate, monitor, and evaluate expectations for the following: DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR CORE PRACTICE RESEARCH RTTT MOU FLORIDA STATUTES FLORIDA SCHOOL LEADER ASSESSMENT FLORIDA EDUCATOR ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES SANTA ROSA DISTRICT LEADER CORE PRACTICE Improving student achievement by focusing on leadership behaviors that influence the desired student results. SREB p. 2, Strategy 3 – Provide instructional coherence and support. DM pp. 7, 17, 18, 25 LET p. 4 #1 – District leaders have a shared agreement on instructional leadership. LET p. 4 #3 – A shared understanding of instructional leadership drives day-to-day work. LET p. 5 #5 – A shared understanding of instructional leadership drives evaluation. LET p. 5 #7 – District/Charter management organization and school leaders’ focus on continuous improvement in their practice. HON, pp. vi & ix ROB pp. 635-669 MOU (D) (2) Improving teacher and principal effectiveness based on performance (ii) bullet #4 pp. 13-14 Statute 1012.98 School community professional development act Statue 1012.985 Regional professional development academies Statute 1012.986 William Cecil Golden Professional Development Program for School Leaders. FSLA Domain 1 – Indicator 1.4 Academic Standards FSLA Domain 2 – Indicator 3.6 Faculty Effectiveness FEAPs 1-6 Core Practice # 1