Mandatory conduct behaviour expected of requirements could be employees and elected addressed in regulations. members leading to increased uncertainty about expectations. May require a strengthening of the Rules of Conduct Regulations. Codes of conduct Increased autonomy for Risk of code imposing are required but the local governments. improper requirements. content is left to the Mandatory conduct Local governments may local government’s requirements could be not clearly specify the discretion. addressed in regulations. standard of behaviour expected of employees and elected members leading to increased uncertainty about expectations. Codes of conduct Status quo Risk of code imposing are required. improper requirements. The content of a Local governments may code is partially not clearly specify the prescribed in standard of behaviour regulations, but is expected of employees otherwise at the and elected members local leading to increased government’s discretion. uncertainty about expectations. Codes of conduct The Increased burden on Minister’s approval are required. could prevent the Department and imposition of improper or Ministerial staff to assess The content of a unclear requirements draft codes. code is prepared by while maintaining local a local government Increased red tape. government autonomy. and approved by Reduced autonomy for the Minister. local governments. Codes of conduct Create more uniformity in Reduced autonomy for are required the codes of conduct local governments. between districts.
Mandatory conduct requirements could be addressed in regulations. behaviour expected of employees and elected members leading to increased uncertainty about expectations. May require a strengthening of the Rules of Conduct Regulations. Codes of conduct are required but the content is left to the local government’s discretion. Increased autonomy for local governments. Mandatory conduct requirements could be addressed in regulations. Risk of code imposing improper requirements. Local governments may not clearly specify the standard of behaviour expected of employees and elected members leading to increased uncertainty about expectations. Codes of conduct are required. The content of a code is partially prescribed in regulations, but is otherwise at the local government’s discretion. Status quo Risk of code imposing improper requirements. Local governments may not clearly specify the standard of behaviour expected of employees and elected members leading to increased uncertainty about expectations. Codes of conduct are required. The content of a code is prepared by a local government and approved by the Minister. The Minister’s approval could prevent the imposition of improper or unclear requirements while maintaining local government autonomy. Increased burden on Department and Ministerial staff to assess draft codes. Increased red tape. Reduced autonomy for local governments. Codes of conduct are required Create more uniformity in the codes of conduct between districts. Reduced autonomy for local governments.