Feedback on the This part (pages 3-7 of the Plan) ‘About Plan’ What people liked Page 6: (one person said they liked this) “Good communication” Page 6: (three people) “Clear information” Page 6: of (two people) “Continuity staff” Page 6: (one person) “Person centred” Page 7: (one person) “Respect us” What people didn’t like One person was disappointed that page 4 said Plan includes “This people with a learning disability who are from black and ethnic because they thought that ethnicity should not be a barrier minorities” in this day and age. Two people said that the Valuing People Now statement quoted on page the same chances and responsibilities as is 4, “… everyone else”, not right for people with profound learning disabilities. A group said pages 6 and 7 have words that are too difficult to understand, such as and of They said ‘transition’ ‘continuity staff’. easier words should be used, like us for of ‘preparing change’ instead ‘transition’. One person said the bit on Person Centred Plans on page 6 should say is entitled to have support to produce a Person Centred Plan ‘Everyone and invite who they want to attend to help them compose one which – belongs to them - with copies going to those family members, social workers, doctors etc., they would like to have a copy.’ What is missing One person said page 3 only talks about good things that have happened, but bad things have happened too. Some people have lost support because of budget cuts in local government. The person thought the Plan should say some things have not been good and that the Plan is trying to make things better. Page 7 talks about One group wanted information on ‘Good transition’.
Feedback on the ‘About This Plan’ part (pages 3-7 of the Plan) What people liked Page 6: “Good communication” (one person said they liked this) Page 6: “Clear information” (three people) Page 6: “Continuity of staff” (two people) Page 6: “Person centred” (one person) Page 7: “Respect us” (one person) What people didn’t like One person was disappointed that page 4 said “This Plan includes people with a learning disability who are from black and ethnic minorities” because they thought that ethnicity should not be a barrier in this day and age. Two people said that the Valuing People Now statement quoted on page 4, “… the same chances and responsibilities as everyone else”, is not right for people with profound learning disabilities. A group said pages 6 and 7 have words that are too difficult to understand, such as ‘transition’ and ‘continuity of staff’. They said easier words should be used, like ‘preparing us for change’ instead of ‘transition’. One person said the bit on Person Centred Plans on page 6 should say ‘Everyone is entitled to have support to produce a Person Centred Plan and invite who they want to attend to help them compose one – which belongs to them - with copies going to those family members, social workers, doctors etc., they would like to have a copy.’ What is missing One person said page 3 only talks about good things that have happened, but bad things have happened too. Some people have lost support because of budget cuts in local government. The person thought the Plan should say some things have not been good and that the Plan is trying to make things better. Page 7 talks about ‘Good transition’. One group wanted information on