[76] I am also of the view that persons who are in the employ of the Government must from now on know that if they act in a manner that is despicable and contrary to what they were employed to do, the message will be sent home that officers who behave in such a fashion will have to pay a personal price and will not have the public purse pay a reward for their indiscretions. In view of the order I will issue against the said officers, it important to note that the question of costs, to be addressed below, is without prejudice to the Inspector-General acting in terms of Regulation 27 of the Police Act, as he may deem fit. The application of Regulation 27 should also be seriously considered by the in relation to the claim for N$ 27 000 as this money remains unaccounted for and the finding that the officers appropriated it is unmistakable. Order [77] In the premises, I issue the following order in favour of the plaintiff: – CLAIM 1 payment of the amount of N$ 300 000; – CLAIM 2 payment of the amount of N$ 27 000; – CLAIM 3 payment of the amount of N$ 90 000; – Interest on the aforesaid amounts at the rate of 20% per annum from the date of judgment to the date of final payment; and Messrs. Freddie Nghilinganye and Sackey Kokule be and are hereby called upon to show cause in person or by legal representatives of their own choice and at their own cost, on or before 27 September 2017, why: (a) Costs of suit in this matter should not be ordered on the scale between attorney and client; (b) Both Mr. Nghilinganye and Kokule should personally not pay such costs, jointly and severally, the one paying and the other being absolved.
[76] I am also of the view that persons who are in the employ of the Government must from now on know that if they act in a manner that is despicable and contrary to what they were employed to do, the message will be sent home that officers who behave in such a fashion will have to pay a personal price and will not have the public purse pay a reward for their indiscretions. In view of the order I will issue against the said officers, it important to note that the question of costs, to be addressed below, is without prejudice to the Inspector-General acting in terms of Regulation 27 of the Police Act, as he may deem fit. The application of Regulation 27 should also be seriously considered by the in relation to the claim for N$ 27 000 as this money remains unaccounted for and the finding that the officers appropriated it is unmistakable. Order [77] In the premises, I issue the following order in favour of the plaintiff: – CLAIM 1 – payment of the amount of N$ 300 000; CLAIM 2 – payment of the amount of N$ 27 000; CLAIM 3 – payment of the amount of N$ 90 000; Interest on the aforesaid amounts at the rate of 20% per annum from the date of judgment to the date of final payment; and Messrs. Freddie Nghilinganye and Sackey Kokule be and are hereby called upon to show cause in person or by legal representatives of their own choice and at their own cost, on or before 27 September 2017, why: (a) Costs of suit in this matter should not be ordered on the scale between attorney and client; (b) Both Mr. Nghilinganye and Kokule should personally not pay such costs, jointly and severally, the one paying and the other being absolved.