Table 22. Studies measuring OHQoL in conventional dentures Mean age Measurement Other impacts Denture No Study Sample N Study design OHQoL measure (SD/Range) points measured satisfaction Perceived denture performance Individuals seeking Cross One measurement Abuzar, Kahwagi, Denture 1 removable partial 232 > 60 (77.9%) sectional post denture OHIP- 14 Yes Yamakawa(2012) material dentures observational insertion Denture frequency of use Individuals seeking Pain, general ALLEN, MCMILLAN, One measurement implants, removable satisfaction 2 WALSHAW, LOCKER 88 58,64,54 Cohort alone prior OHIP -49 Yes dentures, dentate with dentures, (1999) receiving dentures patients Chewing 3 groups Implant supported Denture ALLEN, MCMILLAN, dentures, Baseline and 3 3 83 57, 60.1, 64.9 Clinical Trial OHIP -49 satisfaction, Yes LOCKER (2001) Conventional dentures months follow-up SF-36 (sought implants), conventional dentures 4 groups (3 edentulous 1dentate) Implant supported ALLEN AND Conventional dentures 58.7, 60.2, Pre-treatment and SF-36, Denture 4 103 Clinical trial OHIP -49 Yes MCMILLAN (2003) (requesting implants) 65.1, 58.7 post treatment satisfaction Conventional dentures Routine treatment 2 groups (edentulous) ALLEN, THOMASON, Implant group Randomised Pre-treatment and JEPSON, NOHL, 64.5 (8.8) Denture 5 Conventional denture 118 controlled 3 months post OHIP -49 Yes SMITH AND ELLIS 68.5 (9.9) satisfaction group trial* treatment (2006)
Table 22. Studies measuring OHQoL in conventional dentures No Study Sample N Mean age (SD/Range) Study design Measurement points OHQoL measure Other impacts measured Denture satisfaction 1 Abuzar, Kahwagi, Yamakawa(2012) Individuals seeking removable partial dentures 232 > 60 (77.9%) Cross sectional observational One measurement post denture insertion OHIP- 14 Perceived denture performance Denture material Denture frequency of use Yes 2 ALLEN, MCMILLAN, WALSHAW, LOCKER (1999) Individuals seeking implants, removable dentures, dentate patients 88 58,64,54 Cohort One measurement alone prior receiving dentures OHIP -49 Pain, general satisfaction with dentures, Chewing Yes 3 ALLEN, MCMILLAN, LOCKER (2001) 3 groups Implant supported dentures, Conventional dentures (sought implants), conventional dentures 83 57, 60.1, 64.9 Clinical Trial Baseline and 3 months follow-up OHIP -49 Denture satisfaction, SF-36 Yes 4 ALLEN AND MCMILLAN (2003) 4 groups (3 edentulous 1dentate) Implant supported Conventional dentures (requesting implants) Conventional dentures Routine treatment 103 58.7, 60.2, 65.1, 58.7 Clinical trial Pre-treatment and post treatment OHIP -49 SF-36, Denture satisfaction Yes 5 ALLEN, THOMASON, JEPSON, NOHL, SMITH AND ELLIS (2006) 2 groups (edentulous) Implant group Conventional denture group 118 64.5 (8.8) 68.5 (9.9) Randomised controlled trial* Pre-treatment and 3 months post treatment OHIP -49 Denture satisfaction Yes