with MEHE specifications Outcome B: Increase in the % of children and Percentage Lebanese Lebanese 2020 for MICS Round 6, Enhanced proportion of youth aged 03-15 Cycle 1: 96% Cycle 1: >96% Lebanese; VASyR, UNHCR quality of students passing above the Cycle 2: 87% Cycle 2: >87% Annually education their grades, and corresponding Cycle 3: 78% Cycle 3: >78% for services and transitioning to the graduation age reporting; learning next grade who have Non-Lebanese Non-Lebanese MEHE environments (disaggregated by completed a Cycle Cycle 1: 68% Cycle 1: >68% information provided, to school type, grade, Cycle 2: 51% Cycle 2: >51% management ensure nationality, and Cycle 3: 52% Cycle 3: >52% appropriate gender); Percentage Lebanese Same rates maintained 2015 and MICS Round 6, learning 99% for all Cycles 2019 or VASyR, UNHCR outcomes for % students who 2020 for children and were at school Non-Lebanese all; youth last year remain 99 for Cycle 1 Annually reporting; at school this year 94 for Cycle 2 for MEHE 93 for Cycle 3 information management Proportion of 2 Percentage Lebanese Same rates maintained 2015 and MICS Round 6, students 100 for transition from Cycle 2019 or VASyR, UNHCR transitioning 1 to 2 2020 for grades 94 for transition from Cycle all; 2 to 3 Annually reporting; 91 for transition from Cycle for MEHE 3 to Secondary information management Non-Lebanese 96 for transition from Cycle 1 to 2 82 for transition from Cycle 2 to 3 82 for transition from Cycle 3 to Secondary Number of Number Grade 3: 0 Grade 3: TBD after pilot Annually CERD students in public Grade 6: 0 Grade 6: TBD after pilot schools successful in Grade 3 and (Baseline at 0 because Grade 6 learning learning assessment is to be assessment tests developed by CERD based on new curriculum)
with MEHE specifications Outcome B: Enhanced quality of education services and learning environments provided, to ensure learning outcomes for children and youth Increase in the proportion of students passing their grades, and transitioning to the next grade (disaggregated by school type, grade, nationality, and gender); % of children and youth aged 03-15 above the corresponding graduation age who have completed a Cycle Percentage Lebanese Cycle 1: 96% Cycle 2: 87% Cycle 3: 78% Non-Lebanese Cycle 1: 68% Cycle 2: 51% Cycle 3: 52% Lebanese Cycle 1: >96% Cycle 2: >87% Cycle 3: >78% Non-Lebanese Cycle 1: >68% Cycle 2: >51% Cycle 3: >52% 2020 for Lebanese; Annually for MICS Round 6, VASyR, UNHCR reporting; MEHE information management % students who were at school last year remain at school this year Percentage Lebanese 99% for all Cycles Non-Lebanese 99 for Cycle 1 94 for Cycle 2 93 for Cycle 3 Same rates maintained 2015 and 2019 or 2020 for all; Annually for MICS Round 6, VASyR, UNHCR reporting; MEHE information management Proportion of students transitioning grades 2 Percentage Lebanese 100 for transition from Cycle 1 to 2 94 for transition from Cycle 2 to 3 91 for transition from Cycle 3 to Secondary Non-Lebanese 96 for transition from Cycle 1 to 2 82 for transition from Cycle 2 to 3 82 for transition from Cycle 3 to Secondary Same rates maintained 2015 and 2019 or 2020 for all; Annually for MICS Round 6, VASyR, UNHCR reporting; MEHE information management Number of students in public schools successful in Grade 3 and Grade 6 learning assessment tests Number Grade 3: 0 Grade 6: 0 (Baseline at 0 because learning assessment is to be developed by CERD based on new curriculum) Grade 3: TBD after pilot Grade 6: TBD after pilot Annually CERD appropriate