significance is labels. Later in the not understood. day the instructor removed the This activity extreme labels and allowed the the final step was group to selecting the first generate a choice. I think considerable positive results range of can come from individual this exercise. thoughts. We These are my were able to perspectives as an narrow our instructor and ideas by learner. elaborating, clarifying, and and •Defines voting on the accurately perspectives of describes the group. problems/issues Historically, we one or •Selects have seen the two main Delphi concepts from implemented in the unit notes 1970, which and/or course allowed for the text exchange of not •Does ideas before adequately link taking a vote. the information But is it selected effective a conclusion •If online? For the is reached, it is nominal group based on technique to be limited effective, and information whether or not I would use it, I This example, would need to again, is have the option two or more largely •Uses of making the data/information descriptive but senders name 3. sources but fails to there is an invisible to the explain the effort to other responses links/relationships address the participants in between the data question and the conference. sources provide If this can be explanations done, then each for the participant will
labels. Later in the day the instructor removed the extreme labels and the final step was selecting the first choice. I think positive results can come from this exercise. These are my perspectives as an instructor and learner. significance is not understood. This activity allowed the group to generate a considerable range of individual thoughts. We were able to narrow our ideas by elaborating, clarifying, and voting on the perspectives of the group. Historically, we have seen the Delphi implemented in 1970, which allowed for the exchange of ideas before taking a vote. But is it effective online? For the nominal group technique to be effective, and whether or not I would use it, I would need to have the option of making the senders name invisible to the other participants in the conference. If this can be done, then each participant will •Defines and accurately describes problems/issues •Selects one or two main concepts from the unit notes and/or course text •Does not adequately link the information selected •If a conclusion is reached, it is based on limited information 3. responses •Uses two or more data/information sources but fails to explain the links/relationships between the data sources This example, again, is largely descriptive but there is an effort to address the question and provide explanations for the