clarification, one interpretation of Settlement is that it transforms permanent protections into temporary ones) NCLC Comments on Joint Motion for Settlement at Attachment (in response to NCLC Data Request A, the Settling Parties clarify their intent to abide by D.12-03-054, the decision which establishes the permanent nature of the protection of live CSR assistance for CARE enrollment) 3. NCLC demonstrated that D.14-06-036 at 13 (Conclusion of Law Yes the Petition to Modify #5) is moot and should be denied. NCLC Response to Petition for Modification at 7-8 (as the terms of the prior Settlement have expired, the request to modify the decision approving the prior Settlement at is moot). 4. NCLC demonstrated that a D.14-06-036 at 5 (Settling Parties agree Yes preferable procedure to address with procedural proposal), 9 NCLC’s the Joint Motion for Settlement (Commission agreeing with NCLC’s (rather than modifying recommendation to reopen record for Commission Decisions sole purpose of considering the new and 12-03-054) was to Settlement Agreement and associated reopen the record for the sole filings), 13 (Conclusion of Law #6) and limited purpose of receiving the Joint Motion for NCLC Response to Petition for Settlement and related Modification at 4-5, 8-9 (recommending comments into the record, and introduction of Settlement into record as issuance of a new Commission new evidence to support a new order, decision on whether to adopt independent of prior orders in this the new Settlement. docket) 5. NCLC contributed to D.14-06-036 at 14 (Ordering Paragraph Yes enforcing the 2 directs utilities to each file a Tier 1 approved Settlement Advice Letter implementing changes Provisions 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 for required by the Settlement) & PG&E, SDG&E and Attachment A (Settlement Provisions SoCalGas, which require the 4.1.2 and 4.1.3)
clarification, one interpretation of Settlement is that it transforms permanent protections into temporary ones) NCLC Comments on Joint Motion for Settlement at Attachment (in response to NCLC Data Request A, the Settling Parties clarify their intent to abide by D.12-03-054, the decision which establishes the permanent nature of the protection of live CSR assistance for CARE enrollment) 3. NCLC demonstrated that the Petition to Modify is moot and should be denied. D.14-06-036 at 13 (Conclusion of Law #5) NCLC Response to Petition for Modification at 7-8 (as the terms of the prior Settlement have expired, the request to modify the decision approving the prior Settlement at is moot). Yes 4. NCLC demonstrated that a preferable procedure to address the Joint Motion for Settlement (rather than modifying Commission Decisions and 12-03-054) was to reopen the record for the sole and limited purpose of receiving the Joint Motion for Settlement and related comments into the record, and issuance of a new Commission decision on whether to adopt the new Settlement. D.14-06-036 at 5 (Settling Parties agree with NCLC’s procedural proposal), 9 (Commission agreeing with NCLC’s recommendation to reopen record for sole purpose of considering the new Settlement Agreement and associated filings), 13 (Conclusion of Law #6) NCLC Response to Petition for Modification at 4-5, 8-9 (recommending introduction of Settlement into record as new evidence to support a new order, independent of prior orders in this docket) Yes 5. NCLC contributed to enforcing the Settlement Provisions 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 for PG&E, SDG&E and SoCalGas, which require the D.14-06-036 at 14 (Ordering Paragraph 2 directs utilities to each file a Tier 1 Advice Letter implementing changes required by the Settlement) & Attachment A (Settlement Provisions 4.1.2 and 4.1.3) approved Yes