Standard 3: Middle Level 14 2.5 0 50 50 .5 Curriculum and Assessment I Standard 4: Middle 14 2.9 0 7 93 .26 Teaching Fields I Standard 4: Middle Level 14 3.0 0 0 100 0 Teaching Fields II Standard 6: Family and 14 2.2 7 64 29 .56 Community Involvement I Standard 6: Family and 14 2.5 0 50 50 .5 Community Involvement II Standard 6: Family and 14 2.5 0 50 50 .5 Community Involvement III 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target 2011 Percent Scoring at Each Performance Level N Mean 1 2 3 SD Standard 1: Young 22 2.7 5 23 72 .6 Adolescent Development I Standard 1: Young 22 2.9 0 14 86 .3 Adolescent Development II Standard 3: Middle Level 22 2.8 5 14 81 .5 Curriculum and Assessment I Standard 4: Middle Level 22 2.5 5 45 50 .6 Teaching Fields I Standard 4: Middle Level 22 2.8 5 14 81 .5 Teaching Fields II Standard 6: Family and 22 2.4 9 41 50 .7 Community Involvement I Standard 6: Family and 22 2.4 9 41 50 .7 Community Involvement II Standard 6: Family and 22 2.6 5 32 63 .6 Community Involvement III 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target The data showed that candidates who completed the program were able to use technology effectively and that they understand the exceptionalities they will encounter in the classroom. Additionally, they were able to prepare themselves to facilitate the learning of middle level students with exceptionalities and locate resources to aid this facilitation. The data show that candidates are scoring at proficient levels. This assessment demonstrates candidates’ knowledge of concepts, principles, theories and research about young adolescent development that they respond positively to diversity in the planning of instruction (Standard 1)
Standard 3: Middle Level Curriculum and Assessment I 14 2.5 0 50 50 .5 Standard 4: Middle Teaching Fields I 14 2.9 0 7 93 .26 Standard 4: Middle Level Teaching Fields II 14 3.0 0 0 100 0 Standard 6: Family and Community Involvement I 14 2.2 7 64 29 .56 Standard 6: Family and Community Involvement II 14 2.5 0 50 50 .5 Standard 6: Family and Community Involvement III 14 2.5 0 50 50 .5 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target 2011 Percent Scoring at Each Performance Level N Mean 1 2 3 SD Standard 1: Young Adolescent Development I 22 2.7 5 23 72 .6 Standard 1: Young Adolescent Development II 22 2.9 0 14 86 .3 Standard 3: Middle Level Curriculum and Assessment I 22 2.8 5 14 81 .5 Standard 4: Middle Level Teaching Fields I 22 2.5 5 45 50 .6 Standard 4: Middle Level Teaching Fields II 22 2.8 5 14 81 .5 Standard 6: Family and Community Involvement I 22 2.4 9 41 50 .7 Standard 6: Family and Community Involvement II 22 2.4 9 41 50 .7 Standard 6: Family and Community Involvement III 22 2.6 5 32 63 .6 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target The data showed that candidates who completed the program were able to use technology effectively and that they understand the exceptionalities they will encounter in the classroom. Additionally, they were able to prepare themselves to facilitate the learning of middle level students with exceptionalities and locate resources to aid this facilitation. The data show that candidates are scoring at proficient levels. This assessment demonstrates candidates’ knowledge of concepts, principles, theories and research about young adolescent development that they respond positively to diversity in the planning of instruction (Standard 1)