6. Someone says: It follows that whatever is a consciousness in “do not rely on consciousness” necessarily has not realized emptiness because with respect to whatever is that [consciousness in “do not rely on it is necessarily not reasonable to assert the mode of in accordance with perception by it because a meaning of “do not rely on consciousness” exists. དེ་ལ་ཁ་ཅིག Our response: [That a meaning of “do not rely on consciousness” exists] does not entail [that with respect to whatever is a consciousness in “do not rely on consciousness,” it is necessarily not reasonable to assert the mode of subsistence in accordance with perception by it] because not asserting as the final mode of subsistence in accordance with the appearance to an inferential consciousness realizing emptiness is the meaning [of “do not rely on consciousness”] because if it were otherwise, there would be no proliferations of dualistic appearance in the perspective of the by an inference realizing emptiness.
6. Someone says: It follows that whatever is a consciousness in “do not rely on consciousness” necessarily has not realized emptiness because with respect to whatever is that [consciousness in “do not rely on it is necessarily not reasonable to assert the mode of in accordance with perception by it because a meaning of “do not rely on consciousness” exists. དེ་ལ་ཁ་ཅིག Our response: [That a meaning of “do not rely on consciousness” exists] does not entail [that with respect to whatever is a consciousness in “do not rely on consciousness,” it is necessarily not reasonable to assert the mode of subsistence in accordance with perception by it] because not asserting as the final mode of subsistence in accordance with the appearance to an inferential consciousness realizing emptiness is the meaning [of “do not rely on consciousness”] because if it were otherwise, there would be no proliferations of dualistic appearance in the perspective of the by an inference realizing emptiness.