Table 3 continued Gender role Measure / Coping Stressful Scoring Measure Author Population Situation Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics procedure (Dependent investigated (Independent Variable) Variable) Long (1990) Male and Work-related BSRI / WCCL Multiple regression No significant findings for androgyny N/A female stressor Masculinity managers × femininity Increases in masc. predicted: = -.12. =.03, 1) R² F(4, β interaction less use of avoidance 1) 125) = 3.58, < .05 p more use of problem-reappraisal 2) .17. . =.03, 2) = R² F(3, β Increases in fem. predicted: 126) = 3.85, < .05 p more problem-reappraisal 3) .29. = .06, 3) = R² F(3, β active problem-solving 4) 126) = 8.74, < .01 p total coping 5) .15. = .03, 4) = R² F(4, β 126) = 3.75, < .05 p .16. = .03, 5) = R² F(3, β 125) = 4.10, < .05 p May & Males on a None BSRI / CI ANOVAs Total Andr. (p < .01) and masc. (p * Spangenberg Business specified Median-split hoc < .01) individuals scored significantly Tukey’s post (1997) Masters higher on total coping compared to und. All scores < .01 p course and fem. individuals Coping with the environment: Andr. individuals coped more flexibly with the environment compared to Masc., Fem. and Und.. Andr. and Masc. coped more actively compared to Fem. and Und.. Coping with self: Andr. coped more flexible then Fem. and Und. individuals. Masc. coped more actively compared to Fem. and Und.. * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated, Note.
Table 3 continued Author Population Stressful Situation investigated Gender role Measure / Scoring procedure (Independent Variable) Coping Measure (Dependent Variable) Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics Long (1990) Male and female managers Work-related stressor BSRI / Masculinity × femininity interaction WCCL Multiple regression No significant findings for androgyny Increases in masc. predicted: less use of avoidance 1) more use of problem-reappraisal 2) Increases in fem. predicted: more problem-reappraisal 3) active problem-solving 4) total coping 5) N/A 1) β = -.12. R² =.03, F(4, 125) = 3.58, p < .05 2) β = .17. . R² =.03, F(3, 126) = 3.85, p < .05 3) β = .29. R² = .06, F(3, 126) = 8.74, p < .01 4) β = .15. R² = .03, F(4, 126) = 3.75, p < .05 5) β = .16. R² = .03, F(3, 125) = 4.10, p < .05 May & Spangenberg (1997) Males on a Business Masters course None specified BSRI / Median-split CI ANOVAs Tukey’s post hoc Total Andr. (p < .01) and masc. (p < .01) individuals scored significantly higher on total coping compared to und. and fem. individuals Coping with the environment: Andr. individuals coped more flexibly with the environment compared to Masc., Fem. and Und.. Andr. and Masc. coped more actively compared to Fem. and Und.. Coping with self: Andr. coped more flexible then Fem. and Und. individuals. Masc. coped more actively compared to Fem. and Und.. * All scores p < .01 Note. * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated,