the student is participants. A able to problem with appreciate the the NGT was significance of that individual the parts in input was relation to the on whole. personal The perceptions, NGT is a issues, or consensus experiences planning tool rather than the that helps idea of a more prioritize issues inclusive (ref). Research subject to be on the NGT studied. It shows that in seemed we numerous danced around circumstances the problem a the process bit making me produces better think that this results than activity would unstructured be more group effective if interactions aliases were (ref). Research used. It should has also also be more revealed that minimizing As an interaction educator I see between group this technique members as being useful increases for drawing the creativity and learners into a stimulates more ideas (ref). At the onset, it discussion. But appeared that, my position is as the above that a cited research “live indicates, this chat session” would have kind of been a more structured effective and discussion was efficient effective. activity. However, as the discussion •Substantiated progressed it positions are
participants. A problem with the NGT was that individual input was on personal perceptions, issues, or experiences rather than the idea of a more inclusive subject to be studied. It seemed we danced around the problem a bit making me think that this activity would be more effective if aliases were used. It should also be more As an educator I see this technique as being useful for drawing the learners into a discussion. But my position is that a “live chat session” would have been a more effective and efficient activity. the student is able to appreciate the significance of the parts in relation to the whole. The NGT is a consensus planning tool that helps prioritize issues (ref). Research on the NGT shows that in numerous circumstances the process produces better results than unstructured group interactions (ref). Research has also revealed that minimizing interaction between group members increases creativity and stimulates more ideas (ref). At the onset, it appeared that, as the above cited research indicates, this kind of structured discussion was effective. However, as the discussion progressed it •Substantiated positions are