Table 4 Descriptive Statistics Difference in Perceptions of Fairness and Satisfaction – Agents’ No Resp Resp No Resp/Respa Resp No Info No Info No Info Info Paid <0.60> <2.58> <1.68> <1.93> Fairly (3.34) (2.19) (2.88) (3.52) Differenceb n = 10 n = 12 n = 22 n = 14 Satisfied <0.70> <2.17> <1.50> <2.93> Process (3.16) (3.07) (3.13) (3.22) Differencec n = 10 n = 12 n = 22 n = 14 Satisfied 0.60 <0.42> <1.35> <2.07> Allocation (2.95) (3.37) (3.15) (3.36) Differenced n = 10 n = 12 n = 22 n = 14 a We combine ratings from the and conditions to compare them an aggregate to the No Resp/No Info Resp/No Info ratings from the condition. Resp/Info b is the difference in agreement ratings between the disadvantaged and advantaged agents to Paid Fairly Difference the statement I was paid on a 9-pt Likert scale with end caps as and “I believe fairly”, “Strongly Disagree” “Strongly A positive (negative) difference shows a higher rating from the disadvantaged (advantaged) agent. Agree”. c is the difference in agreement ratings between the disadvantaged and advantaged Satisfied Process Difference agents to the statement was satisfied with the on a 9-pt Likert scale with end caps as “I process”, “Strongly and A positive (negative) difference shows a higher rating from the disadvantaged Disagree” “Strongly Agree”. (advantaged) agent. d is the difference in agreement ratings between the disadvantaged and advantaged Satisfied Allocation Difference agents to the statement was satisfied with how the ORANGE group member decided to distribute the $25 “I payoff”,
Table 4 Descriptive Statistics – Difference in Agents’ Perceptions of Fairness and Satisfaction No Resp No Info Resp No Info No Resp/Respa No Info Resp Info Paid Fairly Differenceb <0.60> (3.34) n = 10 <2.58> (2.19) n = 12 <1.68> (2.88) n = 22 <1.93> (3.52) n = 14 Satisfied Process Differencec <0.70> (3.16) n = 10 <2.17> (3.07) n = 12 <1.50> (3.13) n = 22 <2.93> (3.22) n = 14 Satisfied Allocation Differenced 0.60 (2.95) n = 10 <0.42> (3.37) n = 12 <1.35> (3.15) n = 22 <2.07> (3.36) n = 14 a We combine ratings from the No Resp/No Info and Resp/No Info conditions to compare them an aggregate to the ratings from the Resp/Info condition. b Paid Fairly Difference is the difference in agreement ratings between the disadvantaged and advantaged agents to the statement “I believe I was paid fairly”, on a 9-pt Likert scale with end caps as “Strongly Disagree” and “Strongly Agree”. A positive (negative) difference shows a higher rating from the disadvantaged (advantaged) agent. c Satisfied Process Difference is the difference in agreement ratings between the disadvantaged and advantaged agents to the statement “I was satisfied with the process”, on a 9-pt Likert scale with end caps as “Strongly Disagree” and “Strongly Agree”. A positive (negative) difference shows a higher rating from the disadvantaged (advantaged) agent. d Satisfied Allocation Difference is the difference in agreement ratings between the disadvantaged and advantaged agents to the statement “I was satisfied with how the ORANGE group member decided to distribute the $25 payoff”,