Santa Rosa County District Schools District Leader Evaluation Plan District Office Core Practice #8: Using the District’s School Administrator Evaluation System Effectively, to Support, Monitor and Evaluate the Effectiveness of School Leaders How does your district office evaluation system communicate, monitor, and evaluate expectations for the following research-based best practices: FLORIDA SANTA ROSA DISTRICT FLORIDA EDUCATOR DISTRICT FLORIDA SCHOOL RESEARCH RTTT MOU ADMINISTRATOR CORE STATUTES ACCOMPLISHED LEADER CORE LEADER ASSESSMENT PRACTICE PRACTICES PRACTICE Monitoring the Statute 1012.34 DM pp. 5, 15, 17 FSLA Domain 2 – FEAPs Items 1-6 Core Practice 1 effectiveness of Personnel Indicators 3.1 FEAPs, principals and using evaluation LET p. 3 3.6 Faculty contemporary research procedures and LET p. 5 #7 – Effectiveness and the district’s criteria District/Charter principal evaluation management system criteria and organization and procedures to improve school leaders’ focus student achievement on continuous and leadership improvement in their proficiency on the FPLS practice. and FEAPs. HON, p. vi ROB pp.635-669 Providing and receiving FSLA Domain 1 – DM pp. 10, 33 FEAPs Quality of Core Practice 1 timely and actionable Indicator 1.2 LET p. 5 # 7 – Instruction feedback to and from Performance Data District/Charter #4 Assessment leaders on the management effectiveness of organization and FSLA Domain 2 – leadership on priority school leaders’ focus Indicators 3.3 goals and the cause and on continuous Learning Goals effect relationships improvement in their Alignments, 4.2 between professional practice. Feedback Practices practice and student LET p. 8 #7 – Central achievement on those office evaluates goals. Instructional Leadership Directors on principals’ growth and performance.
Santa Rosa County District Schools District Leader Evaluation Plan District Office Core Practice #8: Using the District’s School Administrator Evaluation System Effectively, to Support, Monitor and Evaluate the Effectiveness of School Leaders How does your district office evaluation system communicate, monitor, and evaluate expectations for the following research-based best practices: DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR CORE PRACTICE RESEARCH RTTT MOU FLORIDA STATUTES FLORIDA SCHOOL LEADER ASSESSMENT FLORIDA EDUCATOR ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES SANTA ROSA DISTRICT LEADER CORE PRACTICE Monitoring the effectiveness of principals and using contemporary research and the district’s principal evaluation system criteria and procedures to improve student achievement and leadership proficiency on the FPLS and FEAPs. DM pp. 5, 15, 17 LET p. 3 LET p. 5 #7 – District/Charter management organization and school leaders’ focus on continuous improvement in their practice. HON, p. vi ROB pp.635-669 Statute 1012.34 Personnel evaluation procedures and criteria FSLA Domain 2 – Indicators 3.1 FEAPs, 3.6 Faculty Effectiveness FEAPs Items 1-6 Core Practice 1 Providing and receiving timely and actionable feedback to and from leaders on the effectiveness of leadership on priority goals and the cause and effect relationships between professional practice and student achievement on those goals. DM pp. 10, 33 LET p. 5 # 7 – District/Charter management organization and school leaders’ focus on continuous improvement in their practice. LET p. 8 #7 – Central office evaluates Instructional Leadership Directors on principals’ growth and performance. FSLA Domain 1 – Indicator 1.2 Performance Data FSLA Domain 2 – Indicators 3.3 Learning Goals Alignments, 4.2 Feedback Practices FEAPs Quality of Instruction #4 Assessment Core Practice 1