Learning Progression Scale Sample Progress Monitoring and Assessment Activities Explain how scientific knowledge about I am able to evaluate the use and importance of replication in a natural disasters has changed as new scientific investigation. Score/Step 5.0 evidence is discovered through replication of the investigation. Identify an instance in history when I am able to explain the need for replication in a scientific scientific knowledge has changed as a investigation. Score/Step 4.0 result of new evidence once an investigation was replicated or repeated by someone else Compare data from different student I am able to explain why scientific investigations should be Score/Step 3.0 groups that investigated the same problem replicable (repeated by others). Target and explain why scientific investigations (Learning Goal) should be (replicated (repeated by others) Perform scientific investigation using I am able to recognize that scientific investigations should be repetition and collect data from other replicable (repeated by others).. Score/Step 2.0 groups that did the same investigation (replication). I am able to recognize and explain the need for repeated Score/Step 1.0 experimental trials. SC.6.N.1.3 Assessed as SC.8.N.1.1: Explain the difference between an experiment and other types of scientific investigation, and explain the relative benefits and limitations of each. (Level 3: Strategic Thinking & Complex Reasoning) Learning Progression Scale Sample Progress Monitoring and Assessment Activities
Scale Learning Progression Sample Progress Monitoring and Assessment Activities Score/Step 5.0 I am able to evaluate the use and importance of replication in a scientific investigation. Explain how scientific knowledge about natural disasters has changed as new evidence is discovered through replication of the investigation. Score/Step 4.0 I am able to explain the need for replication in a scientific investigation. Identify an instance in history when scientific knowledge has changed as a result of new evidence once an investigation was replicated or repeated by someone else Score/Step 3.0 Target (Learning Goal) I am able to explain why scientific investigations should be replicable (repeated by others). Compare data from different student groups that investigated the same problem and explain why scientific investigations should be (replicated (repeated by others) Score/Step 2.0 I am able to recognize that scientific investigations should be replicable (repeated by others).. Perform scientific investigation using repetition and collect data from other groups that did the same investigation (replication). Score/Step 1.0 I am able to recognize and explain the need for repeated experimental trials. SC.6.N.1.3 Assessed as SC.8.N.1.1: Explain the difference between an experiment and other types of scientific investigation, and explain the relative benefits and limitations of each. (Level 3: Strategic Thinking & Complex Reasoning) Scale Learning Progression Sample Progress Monitoring and Assessment Activities