KUBOKI, ICHIKAWA, BABA,HIDESHIMA, SATO,WAKE, Evaluation of a 3 groups multi-axis Measurement at TSUGA, Edentulous Multi-axis. OHIP 49 assessment – baseline and 2 27 SAKURAI, SATO, Partially edentulous 151 66.3 (11.5) Longitudinal Japanese scheme No weeks after first ISHIBASHI, YATANI, Patients with teeth assessment version introduced for visit OHYAMA, problems prosthodontic AKAGAWA, HIRAI, treatment SASAKI AND KOYANO (2012) Elderly divided into 3 groups Cross OHIP -49 LEE, YANG, HO AND Edentulous and satisfied One measurement Denture 28 1332 74.05 sectional (Chinese Yes LEE (2012) Edentulous and not only replacement observational version) satisfied with dentures Dentulous Activities of daily living LOCKER, MATEAR, Measured after a 225 Cross (ADL), STEPHENS, personal interview. GOHAI, 29 1 group of elderly people 83 sectional Perceived Yes LAWRENCE AND Reference period 14 observational stress PAYNE (2001) of 1 year dentures) questionnaire (PSQ) To determine a short of OHIP questionnaire, 541 Discriminant LOCKER AND ALLEN Community dwelling Longitudinal Baseline 1, 3 and 7 OHIP -49 , OHIP 30 (3 years <50 validity was No (2002) older adults observational year follow-up -14 follow up) determined between denture wearers 2 groups of denture MICHAURD, Baseline and 6 McGill Denture wearers 70 Longitudinal 31 GRANDMORT, FEINE 199 month 1 year OHIP - 20 Satisfaction Yes Implant over dentures Range 64-85 observation AND EMAMI (2012) follow-up visits Instrument Conventional dentures 3 groups OIDP and OHIP- Satisfaction, MONTERO, LOPEZ, 78 Cross Requesting prostheses 64.7 Baseline and 3 14 chewing, 32 GALINDO, VICENTE (31, sectional Yes Conventional prostheses (10.7) months follow-up Spanish aesthetic AND BRAVO (2009) 29,18) observational Control group (neither) versions function
27 KUBOKI, ICHIKAWA, BABA,HIDESHIMA, SATO,WAKE, TSUGA, SAKURAI, SATO, ISHIBASHI, YATANI, OHYAMA, AKAGAWA, HIRAI, SASAKI AND KOYANO (2012) 3 groups Edentulous Partially edentulous Patients with teeth problems 151 66.3 (11.5) Multi-axis. Longitudinal assessment Measurement at baseline and 2 weeks after first visit OHIP – 49 Japanese version Evaluation of a multi-axis assessment scheme introduced for prosthodontic treatment No 28 LEE, YANG, HO AND LEE (2012) Elderly divided into 3 groups Edentulous and satisfied Edentulous and not satisfied with dentures Dentulous 1332 74.05 Cross sectional observational One measurement only OHIP -49 (Chinese version) Denture replacement Yes 29 LOCKER, MATEAR, STEPHENS, LAWRENCE AND PAYNE (2001) 1 group of elderly people 225 dentures) 83 Cross sectional observational Measured after a personal interview. Reference period of 1 year GOHAI, Activities of daily living (ADL), Perceived stress questionnaire (PSQ) Yes 30 LOCKER AND ALLEN (2002) Community dwelling older adults 541 (3 years follow up) <50 Longitudinal observational Baseline 1, 3 and 7 year follow-up OHIP -49 , OHIP -14 To determine a short of OHIP questionnaire, Discriminant validity was determined between denture wearers No 31 MICHAURD, GRANDMORT, FEINE AND EMAMI (2012) 2 groups of denture wearers Implant over dentures Conventional dentures 199 70 Range 64-85 Longitudinal observation Baseline and 6 month 1 year follow-up visits OHIP - 20 McGill Denture Satisfaction Instrument Yes 32 MONTERO, LOPEZ, GALINDO, VICENTE AND BRAVO (2009) 3 groups Requesting prostheses Conventional prostheses Control group (neither) 78 (31, 29,18) 64.7 (10.7) Cross sectional observational Baseline and 3 months follow-up OIDP and Spanish versions Satisfaction, chewing, aesthetic function Yes OHIP- 14 14