coliform, Covers public supply, Data evaluated Reporting began Domestic wells Data evaluated here Goal is to analyze at Data evaluated here rural domestic sampled were here were drawn included wells of least one sample in include only in 2006 after LA”s home use), located primarily in various use: public every 289 km2 area registered active only from raw heavy metal rule irrigation, livestock, rural areas. Data can supply, domestic, by a single set of domestic wells. (untreated) source required all arsenic aquaculture, be compared irrigation, industrial, analytical methods. supply well water laboratory tests industrial, mining, and because of the observation, and Covers 89% of US samples. There are results be reported thermoelectric power consistency of the monitor. land area. no federal or state wells. No to LDHH sampling design, consumptive use data requirements for sampling protocols, were collected for any monitoring arsenic and water-quality of the categories. Data in source water. analyses. were obtained from multiple state, federal and local sources, and quality or accuracy of these data are
coliform, Domestic wells sampled were located primarily in rural areas. Data can be compared because of the consistency of the sampling design, sampling protocols, and water-quality analyses. Data evaluated here were drawn only from raw (untreated) source supply well water samples. There are no federal or state requirements for monitoring arsenic in source water. Data evaluated here included wells of various use: public supply, domestic, irrigation, industrial, observation, and monitor. Goal is to analyze at least one sample in every 289 km2 area by a single set of analytical methods. Covers 89% of US land area. Data evaluated here include only registered active domestic wells. Covers public supply, rural domestic home use), irrigation, livestock, aquaculture, industrial, mining, and thermoelectric power wells. No consumptive use data were collected for any of the categories. Data were obtained from multiple state, federal and local sources, and quality or accuracy of these data are Reporting began in 2006 after LA”s heavy metal rule required all arsenic laboratory tests results be reported to LDHH