3 measurements Convenience sample of within 3-4-week Influence of REISSMANN, JOHN people seeking dental Longitudinal period post 39 42 57.5 (15.7) OHIP-49 administration No AND SCHIERZ(2011) treatment at a observational intervention. One methods prosthodontic unit pre-treatment for new patients Schedule for the Evaluation Baseline before of RING, HOFER, Individuals receiving Randomised treatment and 3 Individual 40 HEUSTON, HARRIS conventional denture 117 64 (8) OHIP -49 No control trial month follow-up Quality of Life AND BOYLE (2005) treatment after treatment Direct – Weighing SEIQoL-DW Compare Individuals recruited in Cross Condition normative and Ryu,Tsakos and One measurement 41 Korean National health 1029 30-64 sectional specific (CS socio-dental No Sheiham (2008) only survey observational prosthodontic needs Quality of life Community dwelling Cross was assessed Samnieng, P One measurement 41 Thai aged 60 years or 428 68.79 sectional GOHAI with No Lekatana, H (2016) only older observational SOUZA, Baseline before Validation of Edentulous conventional PATROCINIO, PERO, Longitudinal surgery and OHIP EDENT the – 43 complete denture 58 69.1 (10.3)) No MARRA AND observational up 3 months after Brazilian version wearers COMPAGNONI (2007) surgery version Association 2 groups edentulous One measurement between Torres, Costa, Implant supported Cross only? (mention of personality Modena, Cota, Cortes 64.24 (10.69) 44 mandibular dentures 100 sectional 12 months prior OHIP-14 traits and No and Seraidarian 61.78 (8.92) Conventional dentures observational conclusion of quality of life (2011) study) in denture wearers
39 REISSMANN, JOHN AND SCHIERZ(2011) Convenience sample of people seeking dental treatment at a prosthodontic unit 42 57.5 (15.7) Longitudinal observational 3 measurements within 3-4-week period post intervention. One pre-treatment for new patients OHIP-49 Influence of administration methods No 40 RING, HOFER, HEUSTON, HARRIS AND BOYLE (2005) Individuals receiving conventional denture treatment 117 64 (8) Randomised control trial Baseline before treatment and 3 month follow-up after treatment OHIP -49 Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life – Direct Weighing SEIQoL-DW No 41 Ryu,Tsakos and Sheiham (2008) Individuals recruited in Korean National health survey 1029 30-64 Cross sectional observational One measurement only Condition specific (CS Compare normative and socio-dental prosthodontic needs No 41 Samnieng, P Lekatana, H (2016) Community dwelling Thai aged 60 years or older 428 68.79 Cross sectional observational One measurement only GOHAI Quality of life was assessed with No 43 SOUZA, PATROCINIO, PERO, MARRA AND COMPAGNONI (2007) Edentulous conventional complete denture wearers 58 69.1 (10.3)) Longitudinal observational Baseline before surgery and 3 months after surgery OHIP EDENT – Brazilian version Validation of the version No 44 Torres, Costa, Modena, Cota, Cortes and Seraidarian (2011) 2 groups edentulous Implant supported mandibular dentures Conventional dentures 100 64.24 (10.69) 61.78 (8.92) Cross sectional observational One measurement only? (mention of 12 months prior conclusion of study) OHIP-14 Association between personality traits and quality of life in denture wearers No up