2 groups (denture 55-64 (29.7%) Status of the BAE,KIM,PAIK AND wearers) sectional OHIP- 49 10 445 65-74(46.5%) One measurement removable No KIM (2006) Complete denture telephone (Korean version) >75 (23.8%) denture Partial denture Survey Patients seeking BARAN AND Longitudinal Baseline and 1 OHIP- 49 11 removable partial 136 62.47 (7.36) Denture status No NALCACI (2011) observational year follow-up (Turkish version) denture 2 groups (edentulous) Pre-treatment, 1- Conventional denture post ELLIS, PELEKIS AND 74.2 (7.29) Longitudinal 12 group 40 treatment, OHIP-49 Yes THOMASON (2007) 73.1 (8.61) observational Duplicate denture group 12 months 2 groups (complete edentulous) Sense of EMAMI, ALLISON, Mandibular conventional 66-69 (30.1%) Cross One measurement coherence GRANDMONT, dentures; 13 173 70-79 (61.8%) after 12 months OHIP- 20, mediated effect No ROMPRE AND FEINE Over dentures retained 80-89 (8.1%) observational follow up of dentures on (2010) by implants (ball OHQoL attachments) Change in 2 groups (edentulous) Pre-treatment and FORGIE, SCOTT 58 71 (9.6) Longitudinal satisfaction for 14 Requesting replacement 3 months post OHIP-14 Yes AND DAVIS (2005) (32, 26) 74 (10.3) observational replacement dentures dentures dentures FURUYAMA, 2 groups (edentulous) One measurement TAKABA, INUKAI, Cross OHIP-49 Implant supported 188 at least 1 month 15 MULLIGAN, 51.7 (12.4) (Japanese - No Removable partial (79, 109) post insertion of IGARASHI AND BABA observational version) dentures dentures (2012) 1 group (edentulous Baseline before conventional denture Within GECKILI, BILHAN insertion of OHIP-14 16 wearers seeking implant 78 65-82 subject cross - No AND BILGIN (2011) dentures and a 6 (Turkish version) retained mandibular over over trial month follow-up dentures)
10 BAE,KIM,PAIK AND KIM (2006) 2 groups (denture wearers) Complete denture Partial denture 445 55-64 (29.7%) 65-74(46.5%) >75 (23.8%) telephone Survey One measurement OHIP- 49 (Korean version) Status of the removable denture No 11 BARAN AND NALCACI (2011) Patients seeking removable partial denture 136 62.47 (7.36) Longitudinal observational Baseline and 1 year follow-up OHIP- 49 (Turkish version) Denture status No 12 ELLIS, PELEKIS AND THOMASON (2007) 2 groups (edentulous) Conventional denture group Duplicate denture group 40 74.2 (7.29) 73.1 (8.61) Longitudinal observational Pre-treatment, post treatment, 12 months OHIP-49 Yes 13 EMAMI, ALLISON, GRANDMONT, ROMPRE AND FEINE (2010) 2 groups (complete edentulous) Mandibular conventional dentures; Over dentures retained by implants (ball attachments) 173 66-69 (30.1%) 70-79 (61.8%) 80-89 (8.1%) Cross observational One measurement after 12 months follow up OHIP- 20, Sense of coherence mediated effect of dentures on OHQoL No 14 FORGIE, SCOTT AND DAVIS (2005) 2 groups (edentulous) Requesting replacement dentures 58 (32, 26) 71 (9.6) 74 (10.3) Longitudinal observational Pre-treatment and 3 months post dentures OHIP-14 Change in satisfaction for replacement dentures Yes 15 FURUYAMA, TAKABA, INUKAI, MULLIGAN, IGARASHI AND BABA (2012) 2 groups (edentulous) Implant supported Removable partial dentures 188 (79, 109) 51.7 (12.4) Cross sectional observational One measurement at least 1 month post insertion of dentures OHIP-49 (Japanese version) - No 16 GECKILI, BILHAN AND BILGIN (2011) 1 group (edentulous conventional denture wearers seeking implant retained mandibular over dentures) 78 65-82 Within subject cross over trial Baseline before insertion of dentures and a 6 month follow-up OHIP-14 (Turkish version) - No 1-