Docket No. P2012-2283641, pursuant to 52 Pa. Code § 5.81(a); and (3) refer the consolidated proceeding to the Office of Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings as may be necessary and a decision on the merits of 2016 CAP Rule PECO’s Change Filing, the CAP-SOP proposed in this DSP IV proceeding, and all issues relating to the ability of CAP customers to shop for electric generation supply in service PECO’s territory; THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That the Joint Petition for Reconsideration and/or Clarification of the Coalition for Affordable Utility Services and Energy Efficiency in Pennsylvania and the Tenant Union Representative Network and the Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia, filed on December 19, 2016, relative to the Opinion and Order entered herein on December 8, 2016, is granted, in part, consistent with this Opinion and Order. 2. That the Petition for Reconsideration and/or Clarification of the Office of Consumer Advocate, filed on December 19, 2016 and updated on December 20, 2016, relative to the Opinion and Order entered herein on December 8, 2016, is granted, in part, consistent with this Opinion and Order.
Docket No. P2012-2283641, pursuant to 52 Pa. Code § 5.81(a); and (3) refer the consolidated proceeding to the Office of Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings as may be necessary and a decision on the merits of PECO’s 2016 CAP Rule Change Filing, the CAP-SOP proposed in this DSP IV proceeding, and all issues relating to the ability of CAP customers to shop for electric generation supply in PECO’s service territory; THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That the Joint Petition for Reconsideration and/or Clarification of the Coalition for Affordable Utility Services and Energy Efficiency in Pennsylvania and the Tenant Union Representative Network and the Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia, filed on December 19, 2016, relative to the Opinion and Order entered herein on December 8, 2016, is granted, in part, consistent with this Opinion and Order. 2. That the Petition for Reconsideration and/or Clarification of the Office of Consumer Advocate, filed on December 19, 2016 and updated on December 20, 2016, relative to the Opinion and Order entered herein on December 8, 2016, is granted, in part, consistent with this Opinion and Order.