Dispute Resolution: Complaints, 2 2 2 Hearings Other areas of noncompliance: Monitoring Discipline Activities: Local APR, Data Review, 24 42 42 Desk Audit, Visits, or Other Dispute Resolution: Complaints, 2 2 2 Hearings Other areas of noncompliance: IEP Monitoring implementation and evaluation Activities: Local APR, Data Review, 50 140 140 Desk Audit, Visits, or Other Dispute Resolution: Complaints, 89 110 110 Hearings Other areas of noncompliance: Monitoring Parent/guardian communications Activities: Local APR, Data Review, 56 157 157 Desk Audit, Visits, or Other Dispute Resolution: 2 2 2 Complaints, Hearings Sum the numbers down Column a and Column b 545 544 Percent of noncompliance corrected within one year of identification = (b) / (a) X 100 = 99.82% (column (b) sum divided by column (a) sum) times 100. APPENDIX D Report of Dispute Resolution, FFY2011 –
Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 2 2 2 Other areas of noncompliance: Discipline Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 24 42 42 Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 2 2 2 Other areas of noncompliance: IEP implementation and evaluation Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 50 140 140 Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 89 110 110 Other areas of noncompliance: Parent/guardian communications Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 56 157 157 Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 2 2 2 Sum the numbers down Column a and Column b 545 544 Percent of noncompliance corrected within one year of identification = (b) / (a) X 100 = 99.82% (column (b) sum divided by column (a) sum) times 100. APPENDIX D – Report of Dispute Resolution, FFY2011