Any decision that would be contradictory to, or increase the mitigated risk score (2) of a known risk on the corporate risk register Any decision that is contradictory to risk Any decision that is line with agreed mitigation plans on management plans agreed with British Rowing the corporate risk register or British Rowing risk club’s as part of a water safety assessment assessment Any decision that could reasonably be Secretary and chair only: objective amendment, initial construed as raising an issue relating to conflict Risk estimation/scoring, and restatement/rescoring of risks of interest as and when they emerge or change, following any Any written commitments of the club (even if breaking news events or liaisons with British Rowing, unsigned) relating to the conduct of the club if Leeds City Council the Charity Commission or any that document could reasonably be obtained other governing/legislative body and used to hold the club to account by British Rowing, Leeds City Council the Charity Commission or any other governing/legislative body Changes that have an Director of Rowing only: Routine changes to boathouse Anything that directly contradicts a previous impact upon boat repair or management, boat configuration, training schedules, board decision repairing facilities should Process and strategic training plans and any other operational Any policy or procedural change that, whilst has be made in consultation procedure decisions provided they do not trigger any other with any parties who no overall net effect on the club, may affect the clauses in the preceding sections assist Leeds Rowing Club individual contributions of club members with boat maintenance Footnotes: In line with CC29, the executive committee has a responsibility to manage conflicts of interest, ensuring that it acts only in the best interest of the charity. In the corporate risk register, risks have an unmitigated and a mitigated risk factor, graded from 1 to 10. The overall score is calculated by multiplying probability and impact. Any decision that increases either the mitigated possibility or the mitigated impact (even if one goes up, the other goes down, and the overall score is lower) must be taken at the executive level as this may impact or influence the decision that is taken.
Risk Any decision that is line with agreed mitigation plans on the club’s corporate risk register or British Rowing risk assessment Secretary and chair only: objective amendment, initial estimation/scoring, and restatement/rescoring of risks as and when they emerge or change, following any breaking news events or liaisons with British Rowing, Leeds City Council the Charity Commission or any other governing/legislative body Any decision that would be contradictory to, or increase the mitigated risk score (2) of a known risk on the corporate risk register Any decision that is contradictory to risk management plans agreed with British Rowing as part of a water safety assessment Any decision that could reasonably be construed as raising an issue relating to conflict of interest Any written commitments of the club (even if unsigned) relating to the conduct of the club if that document could reasonably be obtained and used to hold the club to account by British Rowing, Leeds City Council the Charity Commission or any other governing/legislative body Process and procedure Director of Rowing only: Routine changes to boathouse management, boat configuration, training schedules, strategic training plans and any other operational decisions provided they do not trigger any other clauses in the preceding sections Anything that directly contradicts a previous board decision Any policy or procedural change that, whilst has no overall net effect on the club, may affect the individual contributions of club members Changes that have an impact upon boat repair or repairing facilities should be made in consultation with any parties who assist Leeds Rowing Club with boat maintenance Footnotes: In line with CC29, the executive committee has a responsibility to manage conflicts of interest, ensuring that it acts only in the best interest of the charity. In the corporate risk register, risks have an unmitigated and a mitigated risk factor, graded from 1 to 10. The overall score is calculated by multiplying probability and impact. Any decision that increases either the mitigated possibility or the mitigated impact (even if one goes up, the other goes down, and the overall score is lower) must be taken at the executive level as this may impact or influence the decision that is taken.