4 Was appointment of the RTWC/IMC communicated to the worker, 5 employer and PTMP? 4 Did the communication with/to the worker, employer, PTMP contain 5 appropriate information in respect to contact details and the role and responsibilities (including dispute resolution) of the RTWC/IMC? Workplace Rehabilitation Provider 4 If a WRP was appointed is there evidence that communication 6 occurred with the worker regarding their right to choose a provider? 4 Upon appointment of the WRP was the worker advised of the name, 6 contact details and the role and responsibilities of the WRP? 4 If a WRP was appointed was the by the Board confirmed? 6 Return to Work/Management of Alternative Duties 10 If the worker’s injury was significant was a return-to-work plan developed within 5 days of 5 days or alternatively within time frames set out in an IMP approved by the WorkCover Tasmania Board post 1 January 2018? 10 If the worker’s injury was significant was an injury management plan developed within 5 days of 28 days or alternatively within time frames set out in an IMP approved by the WorkCover Tasmania Board post 1 January 2018? 10 Are the return-to-work and injury management plans signed by all 4 parties ie worker, employer, PTMP or alternatively is there evidence 5 that they were consulted in the development of the plans? 6 9 10 Do plans support the return to work hierarchy? 10 Is there evidence that return to work/injury management plans are 5 regularly reviewed by the IMC? 5 Are return to work and injury management plans consecutive? 6 7 10 11
4 5 Was appointment of the RTWC/IMC communicated to the worker, employer and PTMP? 4 5 Did the communication with/to the worker, employer, PTMP contain appropriate information in respect to contact details and the role and responsibilities (including dispute resolution) of the RTWC/IMC? Workplace Rehabilitation Provider 4 6 If a WRP was appointed is there evidence that communication occurred with the worker regarding their right to choose a provider? 4 6 Upon appointment of the WRP was the worker advised of the name, contact details and the role and responsibilities of the WRP? 4 6 If a WRP was appointed was the by the Board confirmed? Return to Work/Management of Alternative Duties 10 If the worker’s injury was significant was a return-to-work plan developed within 5 days of 5 days or alternatively within time frames set out in an IMP approved by the WorkCover Tasmania Board post 1 January 2018? 10 If the worker’s injury was significant was an injury management plan developed within 5 days of 28 days or alternatively within time frames set out in an IMP approved by the WorkCover Tasmania Board post 1 January 2018? 10 4 5 6 9 Are the return-to-work and injury management plans signed by all parties ie worker, employer, PTMP or alternatively is there evidence that they were consulted in the development of the plans? 10 Do plans support the return to work hierarchy? 10 5 Is there evidence that return to work/injury management plans are regularly reviewed by the IMC? 5 6 7 10 11 Are return to work and injury management plans consecutive?