Appendix K Internship Scoring Guide Several of the rubric definitions below were adapted from the following sources: NASP Case Study scoring guide: These are identified within the scoring guide as *NCSP case study rubric The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Kennedy Krieger Institute and Home Outpatient Pediatrics Father Flanagan’s Girls’ Boys’ and Family Services, University of Nebraska Medical School NASP 3 2 1 # Domains Target Acceptable Unacceptable reports, assessment reports, assessment reports and practice Intern’s Intern’s Intern’s strategies, and interventions, strategies, and interventions showed an insufficient suggest that she/he has provided important understanding that school Domain 1 exceptional knowledge of components or details psychologists must be able to Data-Based varied models of assessment requiring a knowledge of use assessment strategies yielding information varied models of gather information and define Decision-Making and identifying strengths and assessment yielding current problem areas. needs, understanding information identifying Accountability: Observations of problems, and measuring strengths and needs, reports and practice Intern’s this progress and understanding problems, provided little evidence to intern’s practice as well as accomplishments. and measuring progress and support knowledge in this his/her written Intern employed systematic accomplishments area. reports processes to collect data and other information, translate Intern provided sufficient Intern did not provide assessment results into data-based illustrations and sufficient data-based decisions about graphs of assessments and illustrations and graphs of service delivery, and outcomes. assessments. evaluate the outcomes of services. These are reflected in illustrations and graphs of assessments, treatment, and follow-up observations. Domain 1 Includes systematic and Inclusive plan for follow-up No plan included detailed plan for follow-up observations included Continued: Monitoring plan observations. These are reflected in illustrations and graphs of follow-up observations.
Appendix K Internship Scoring Guide Several of the rubric definitions below were adapted from the following sources: NASP Case Study scoring guide: These are identified within the scoring guide as *NCSP case study rubric The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Kennedy Krieger Institute Father Flanagan’s Girls’ and Boys’ Home Outpatient Pediatrics and Family Services, University of Nebraska Medical School NASP Domains 3 Target 2 Acceptable 1 Unacceptable # Domain 1 Data-Based Decision-Making and Accountability: Observations of this intern’s practice as well as his/her written reports Intern’s reports, assessment strategies, and interventions, suggest that she/he has exceptional knowledge of varied models of assessment yielding information identifying strengths and needs, understanding problems, and measuring progress and accomplishments. Intern employed systematic processes to collect data and other information, translate assessment results into decisions about service delivery, and evaluate the outcomes of services. These are reflected in illustrations and graphs of assessments, treatment, and follow-up observations. Intern’s reports, assessment strategies, and interventions provided important components or details requiring a knowledge of varied models of assessment yielding information identifying strengths and needs, understanding problems, and measuring progress and accomplishments Intern provided sufficient data-based illustrations and graphs of assessments and outcomes. Intern’s reports and practice showed an insufficient understanding that school psychologists must be able to use assessment strategies gather information and define current problem areas. Intern’s reports and practice provided little evidence to support knowledge in this area. Intern did not provide sufficient data-based illustrations and graphs of assessments. Domain 1 Continued: Monitoring plan Includes systematic and detailed plan for follow-up observations. These are reflected in illustrations and graphs of follow-up observations. Inclusive plan for follow-up observations included No plan included