Table 3 continued Gender role Measure / Coping Stressful Scoring Measure Author Population Situation Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics procedure (Dependent investigated (Independent Variable) Variable) Cheng . of a choice of Masc.: (2005a) 8) to the MANOVA Event main effect of coping, more likely to use 168) = 69.55, < F(7, p continued strategy. controllability × direct action regardless of controllability .001 Coping Fem.: 168) 100.71, < F(7, = p They then (independently for main effect of coping, more acceptance, .001 rated the each group) social support and religious support effectiveness regardless of controllability of the strategy Andr.: = 2.68, < .05 t(24) p Post-hoc t-tests - More direct action coping during controllable events = -5.02, < .001 t(24) p - More acceptance coping during 504) = 23.96, < .00 F(14, p uncontrollable events MANOVA Group × Andr., Masc. and Und. gave different Event controllability effectiveness ratings to different coping × Coping (for strategies across situations of differing 168) = 15.81, < .001 F(7, p effectiveness ratings) controllability 168) = 43.03, < .001 F(7, p MANOVA Event Andr.: controllability × Main effect for coping = 8.43, < .001 t(24) p Coping coping × interaction effect (independently for each group) Direct action perceived as more effective in controllable compared to uncontrollable Post hoc t-tests situations * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated Note.
Table 3 continued Author Population Stressful Situation investigated Gender role Measure / Scoring procedure (Independent Variable) Coping Measure (Dependent Variable) Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics Cheng (2005a) continued . of a choice of 8) to the strategy. They then rated the effectiveness of the strategy MANOVA Event controllability × Coping (independently for each group) Post-hoc t-tests MANOVA Group × Event controllability × Coping (for effectiveness ratings) MANOVA Event controllability × Coping (independently for each group) Post hoc t-tests Masc.: main effect of coping, more likely to use direct action regardless of controllability Fem.: main effect of coping, more acceptance, social support and religious support regardless of controllability Andr.: - More direct action coping during controllable events - More acceptance coping during uncontrollable events Andr., Masc. and Und. gave different effectiveness ratings to different coping strategies across situations of differing controllability Andr.: Main effect for coping coping × interaction effect Direct action perceived as more effective in controllable compared to uncontrollable situations F(7, 168) = 69.55, p < .001 F(7, 168) = 100.71, p < .001 t(24) = 2.68, p < .05 t(24) = -5.02, p < .001 F(14, 504) = 23.96, p < .00 F(7, 168) = 15.81, p < .001 F(7, 168) = 43.03, p < .001 t(24) = 8.43, p < .001 Note. * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated