baseline, it was not clear if this was being used to track progress over time Without the beneficiary consultations introduced by the MEF, it is not clear what system SCA uses to monitor outcomes at the project level, for example it was not clear whether the water systems implemented were being monitored in terms of: where taps are located; accessibility; women’s privacy; use of the water; for latrines, whether these were being used and kept clean; and for hygiene, whether this had resulted in behaviour change or health impacts, etc. Learning SCA project team appear Challenges in the area of very responsive to learning relate to the extent 5 suggestions and to which LANGOCA is really recommendations at all flexible enough to levels. accommodate such learning. Following the 2010 AEW and Further dialogue with AusAID may be useful. observed weaknesses around gender and Although project staff were disability, SCA have put in able to cite examples of noticeable efforts to interactions with other improve in these areas. LANGOCA NGOs, there is little evidence of any real cross learnings from other projects. From the point of view of the project, LANGOCA as a program of 4 agencies appears to be something of an artificial construct. H: ANGO World Vision Australia Project Name Integrated UXO Action Project
baseline, it was not clear if this was being used to track progress over time Without the beneficiary consultations introduced by the MEF, it is not clear what system SCA uses to monitor outcomes at the project level, for example it was not clear whether the water systems implemented were being monitored in terms of: where taps are located; accessibility; women’s privacy; use of the water; for latrines, whether these were being used and kept clean; and for hygiene, whether this had resulted in behaviour change or health impacts, etc. Learning 5 SCA project team appear very responsive to suggestions and recommendations at all levels. Following the 2010 AEW and observed weaknesses around gender and disability, SCA have put in noticeable efforts to improve in these areas. Challenges in the area of learning relate to the extent to which LANGOCA is really flexible enough to accommodate such learning. Further dialogue with AusAID may be useful. Although project staff were able to cite examples of interactions with other LANGOCA NGOs, there is little evidence of any real cross learnings from other projects. From the point of view of the project, LANGOCA as a program of 4 agencies appears to be something of an artificial construct. H: ANGO World Vision Australia Project Name Integrated UXO Action Project