recalled the part of speech where the noted qualities: premier président Brisson’s Caetani’s sa ses On the other hand, he was silent about de ‘son eloquence… doctrine… doctes ecrits’. subsequent opinion that the papal bull amounted to an infringement of national Thou’s liberties, and about the royalist remembrance of historian’s Caetani’s ‘orgueilleux dessein’ in trying to sit in a highly prominent position in court’. Just as it was the leaders of the who had updated Caetani on the plight of Paris, so it Seize was probably they who arranged the pageant that took place the following Sunday. Rozée proceeded cautiously jugea estre expédient que le peuple entendit l'intention du – ‘On pape’ before recalling that there was a involving corps des – ‘procession générale’ ‘le toutes les tous les with preaching by Francesco eccelésiastiques… paroisses… moines’, Panigarola (at Nôtre-Dame, in the presence of the legate) and Pierre Christin (‘prédicateur fort at St-Estienne du Mont. We know that, although popular among moderate célebre’) Panigarola did not always have the support of the Our author gave more Ligueurs, Seize. space to Christin: this preacher made specific mention of qui s'estoient unis Niçois ‘ceux pour la defence et la conservation de la religion catholique, apostolique et romaine’, insisted that only a Catholic could be king of France, and assured his listeners that papal assistance was at hand. It was not just in Paris that awareness of the steadfastness encouraged Catholics. pope’s While Caetani had still been journeying north, the Estates-General of Languedoc Ligueur had declared that they would never accept Henri of Navarre as King of France, a decision that the Toulouse Parlement had promptly registered. Quoting word-for-word from a pamphlet, Rozée was apparently pleased that decisions were being made in an Ligueur
recalled the part of Brisson’s speech where the premier président noted Caetani’s qualities: ‘son eloquence… sa doctrine… ses doctes ecrits’. On the other hand, he was silent about de Thou’s subsequent opinion that the papal bull amounted to an infringement of national liberties, and about the royalist historian’s remembrance of Caetani’s ‘orgueilleux dessein’ in trying to sit in a highly prominent position in court’. Just as it was the leaders of the Seize who had updated Caetani on the plight of Paris, so it was probably they who arranged the pageant that took place the following Sunday. Rozée proceeded cautiously – ‘On jugea estre expédient que le peuple entendit l'intention du pape’ – before recalling that there was a ‘procession générale’ involving ‘le corps des eccelésiastiques… toutes les paroisses… tous les moines’, with preaching by Francesco Panigarola (at Nôtre-Dame, in the presence of the legate) and Pierre Christin (‘prédicateur fort célebre’) at St-Estienne du Mont. We know that, although popular among moderate Ligueurs, Panigarola did not always have the support of the Seize. Our author gave more space to Christin: this Niçois preacher made specific mention of ‘ceux qui s'estoient unis pour la defence et la conservation de la religion catholique, apostolique et romaine’, insisted that only a Catholic could be king of France, and assured his listeners that papal assistance was at hand. It was not just in Paris that awareness of the pope’s steadfastness encouraged Catholics. While Caetani had still been journeying north, the Ligueur Estates-General of Languedoc had declared that they would never accept Henri of Navarre as King of France, a decision that the Toulouse Parlement had promptly registered. Quoting word-for-word from a Ligueur pamphlet, Rozée was apparently pleased that decisions were being made in an