Component 4 Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification Risks and Outcomes Assumptions Outcome C4.1 Reductions Poaching levels of Turtle mortalities due Marine turtle poaching Technical reports; Nesting Risks: (i) Assumptions: in pressure on biodiversity threatened species largely to poaching levels reduced to < 5% of data from turtle watch (i) Data collection is and forest ecosystem reduced; Criteria for around 20% of nesting, nesting. Forest loss is 0%; teams. Forest loss data; accurate. Capacity services conservation and deforestation at ~10%; At Increased adoption of Standards; policies; exists locally to sustainable use of the local level, there is biodiversity friendly guidelines; operating monitor the poaching biodiversity incorporated limited practices in keeping with procedures; compliance and deforestation in policies, standards, and knowledge/awareness of criteria and indicators for checklists levels. Resource loss is regulations for production the criteria for conservation and reversible; Buy-in to and sale of biodiversity sustainable production of sustainable use of natural policy friendly products BD friendly goods as resources recommendations; businesses are mostly Compliance informal and production mechanisms are is primarily undertaken at supported the subsistence level. Outcome C4.2 Producers Number of producers, Few producers employ Number of producers, Technical reports; business Risks: (i) Assumptions: adopt best practices for disaggregated by gender, best practices; Extension disaggregated by gender, reports/accounts; Data (i) Best practices have production of BD friendly employing best practices services and other that adopt best practices based on research on been identifies, tested goods for production of BD programmes provide in production of production activities and approved; Buy-in friendly goods at one information on biodiversity friendly ongoing at the marine to policy marine reserve; Best conservation and practices increase to 75% reserves; Documented recommendations; practices documented and sustainability measures, best practices; training Producers understand promulgated among local but there is no measure curriculum and other the value of producers of BF friendly of compliance; No best relevant materials; conservation and products practice guidelines and compliance evaluations sustainability efforts certification schemes (Some standards for latanye; lansan; honey) Component 1: Enhanced land use planning and regulatory framework (as applied to NE Coast) Component I Outputs Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification
Component 4 Outcomes Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification Risks and Assumptions Outcome C4.1 Reductions in pressure on biodiversity and forest ecosystem services Poaching levels of threatened species reduced; Criteria for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity incorporated in policies, standards, and regulations for production and sale of biodiversity friendly products Turtle mortalities due largely to poaching around 20% of nesting, deforestation at ~10%; At the local level, there is limited knowledge/awareness of the criteria for sustainable production of BD friendly goods as businesses are mostly informal and production is primarily undertaken at the subsistence level. Marine turtle poaching levels reduced to < 5% of nesting. Forest loss is 0%; Increased adoption of biodiversity friendly practices in keeping with criteria and indicators for conservation and sustainable use of natural resources Technical reports; Nesting data from turtle watch teams. Forest loss data; Standards; policies; guidelines; operating procedures; compliance checklists Risks: (i) Assumptions: (i) Data collection is accurate. Capacity exists locally to monitor the poaching and deforestation levels. Resource loss is reversible; Buy-in to policy recommendations; Compliance mechanisms are supported Outcome C4.2 Producers adopt best practices for production of BD friendly goods Number of producers, disaggregated by gender, employing best practices for production of BD friendly goods at one marine reserve; Best practices documented and promulgated among local producers of BF friendly products Few producers employ best practices; Extension services and other programmes provide information on conservation and sustainability measures, but there is no measure of compliance; No best practice guidelines and certification schemes (Some standards for latanye; lansan; honey) Number of producers, disaggregated by gender, that adopt best practices in production of biodiversity friendly practices increase to 75% Technical reports; business reports/accounts; Data based on research on production activities ongoing at the marine reserves; Documented best practices; training curriculum and other relevant materials; compliance evaluations Risks: (i) Assumptions: (i) Best practices have been identifies, tested and approved; Buy-in to policy recommendations; Producers understand the value of conservation and sustainability efforts Component 1: Enhanced land use planning and regulatory framework (as applied to NE Coast) Component I Outputs Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification