even sound, evangelical commentaries, that say Paul in Romans 10:20 twisted this, in this quotation, and got something out of it that in it at all. I believe wasn’t don’t so; I believe Paul was an inspired interpreter of scripture. And when he interpreted, he may not take the whole meaning, he may draw something that, in fact, was there, and not put the stress on something that's not there too; but whatever, I think Paul very definitely quotes 65:1. But, not ready, yet, to we’re look at 65; we are just looking at 64. Is There Evidence of True Repentance? [46:57] And in the outline, letter D: there evidence of true repentance?" Daniel, “Is the prophet Daniel, was one of the godliest men in all of and he Israel’s’ history, understood by books (Jeremiah 29) that seventy years was past, and the time had come when the nation would be delivered from the Babylonian exile. He didn’t say, "Oh, God, promised it and now bring it to us." He is one of the you’ve godliest people in all history, yet he said a great prayer of contrition and Israel’s repentance for the sins of his people in Daniel 9. And evidently, the Lord didn’t think that Daniel was representing all the people, because Daniel says, “The Seventy years are finished, we have been wicked; now we are The repenting.” angel came to him and said, only are seventy years finished, but seventy “Not weeks are determined upon your So there is a long time people.” ahead, “because, you, Daniel, do not represent all the people by any Well, we have to stop means.” there and continue later, next week. Edited and narrated by Dr. Perry Phillips Dan Peredina (editor); Tom Fagn, Caleb Prehlea, Aleah Tarnoviski, Abby Cirella, Brittany Cline, Samantha Twidle, Ayla Lewis, Elise Dadamo, JeffLind, Christ Preyer; Outliner: Elellan Amante and Titler Stephanie Zaloom
even sound, evangelical commentaries, that say Paul in Romans 10:20 twisted this, in this quotation, and got something out of it that wasn’t in it at all. I don’t believe so; I believe Paul was an inspired interpreter of scripture. And when he interpreted, he may not take the whole meaning, he may draw something that, in fact, was there, and not put the stress on something that's not there too; but whatever, I think Paul very definitely quotes 65:1. But, we’re not ready, yet, to look at 65; we are just looking at 64. Is There Evidence of True Repentance? [46:57] And in the outline, letter D: “Is there evidence of true repentance?" Daniel, the prophet Daniel, was one of the godliest men in all of Israel’s’ history, and he understood by books (Jeremiah 29) that seventy years was past, and the time had come when the nation would be delivered from the Babylonian exile. He didn’t say, "Oh, God, you’ve promised it and now bring it to us." He is one of the godliest people in all Israel’s history, yet he said a great prayer of contrition and repentance for the sins of his people in Daniel 9. And evidently, the Lord didn’t think that Daniel was representing all the people, because Daniel says, “The Seventy years are finished, we have been wicked; now we are repenting.” The angel came to him and said, “Not only are seventy years finished, but seventy weeks are determined upon your people.” So there is a long time ahead, “because, you, Daniel, do not represent all the people by any means.” Well, we have to stop there and continue later, next week. Edited and narrated by Dr. Perry Phillips Dan Peredina (editor); Tom Fagn, Caleb Prehlea, Aleah Tarnoviski, Abby Cirella, Brittany Cline, Samantha Twidle, Ayla Lewis, Elise Dadamo, JeffLind, Christ Preyer; Outliner: Elellan Amante and Titler Stephanie Zaloom