Appendix 14 - Evaluation Committee Scoring Record Date: Time: Project Title: Project Reference no: Assessment Issues raised by Objective Weighting Score Criteria Evaluation Committee Do the project proposals meet Compatibility with the criteria set out in the LAG Local Development 20 business plan for the relevant strategy measure? Is the product innovative in its Innovation nature and does it displace 15 existing enterprises? Does the promoter have the Promoter Training/skills, track record or 20 experience experience to deliver? Are the project costs justifiable (reasonableness of costs) and i Financial Viability 20 is funding available to co-fund the project? Is the project viable and will the Sustainability service continue to be 10 delivered? Does the proposal target a Requirement specific need or address a 15 specific gap in the market? Total 100 N.B. Projects must receive a minimum score of 65% prior to being recommended for approval. Has the potential level of deadweight been assessed for this project? YES / NO i.e. would the project proceed without LEADER funding? YES / NO Recommendations of the Evaluation Committee: Signature of Evaluation Committee Member Date:
Appendix 14 - Evaluation Committee Scoring Record Date: Time: Project Title: Project Reference no: Assessment Criteria Objective Issues raised by Evaluation Committee Weighting Score Compatibility with Local Development strategy Do the project proposals meet the criteria set out in the LAG business plan for the relevant measure? 20 Innovation Is the product innovative in its nature and does it displace existing enterprises? 15 Promoter experience Does the promoter have the Training/skills, track record or experience to deliver? 20 Financial Viability Are the project costs justifiable (reasonableness of costs) and i is funding available to co-fund the project? 20 Sustainability Is the project viable and will the service continue to be delivered? 10 Requirement Does the proposal target a specific need or address a specific gap in the market? 15 Total 100 N.B. Projects must receive a minimum score of 65% prior to being recommended for approval. Has the potential level of deadweight been assessed for this project? YES / NO i.e. would the project proceed without LEADER funding? YES / NO Recommendations of the Evaluation Committee: Signature of Evaluation Committee Member Date: