whereas everybody can be a member of BIN anonymous. Therefore, information spread by BIN may fall in the hands of criminals. The chance this happens with the mails spread by Peter van der Linden is much smaller. Also and related, Peter van der Linden can give more detailed information than BIN does. Active part Around 30 persons of the 100 passive members are also active members of the neighborhood watch program. These members walk two to three times a month in the neighborhood. On average, there are around twenty to twenty-five persons present during the walks. The most important aim for walking in the neighborhood, according to Peter van der Linden, is to show the residents that they are visible present in the neighborhood. Based on the reaction he gets from residents, he thinks that people appreciate their work and feel safer in their neighborhood. Also, the residents are becoming aware of the potential danger by seeing the members walking in the street. Beside, during the walks they perform different tasks. Firstly, they check whether backdoors and windows are closed and if necessary they inform the residents about the potential danger of open windows and doors. Secondly, they check whether suspicious persons and cars are in the neighborhood. Thirdly, youth that cause nuisance are being addressed by the members. This is done on a friendly way, based on the ideas of Hans Kaldenbach (Kaldenbach, 2009). The members participated in a curses organized by Lumens Groep. During the curses, the ideas of inter alia Hans Kaldenback were discussed and explained. Fourthly, the members check whether the public street lights work. Fifthly, the members check whether it is noticeable that the residents of a house are on vacation. Sixthly, neighborhood patrols, 3 to 5 times a year. This is the case when, for example, the curtains are closed for several consecutive days. During the walks, no attention is paid on the graffiti, because the neighborhood doesn’t have much graffiti on the walls, according to Peter van der Linden. Interesting is that all the activities do not have an effect on the social cohesion of neighborhood, according to Peter van der Linden. The neighborhood contains around 15.000 residents, of which only 100 are member of the neighborhood watch program.
whereas everybody can be a member of BIN anonymous. Therefore, information spread by BIN may fall in the hands of criminals. The chance this happens with the mails spread by Peter van der Linden is much smaller. Also and related, Peter van der Linden can give more detailed information than BIN does. Active part Around 30 persons of the 100 passive members are also active members of the neighborhood watch program. These members walk two to three times a month in the neighborhood. On average, there are around twenty to twenty-five persons present during the walks. The most important aim for walking in the neighborhood, according to Peter van der Linden, is to show the residents that they are visible present in the neighborhood. Based on the reaction he gets from residents, he thinks that people appreciate their work and feel safer in their neighborhood. Also, the residents are becoming aware of the potential danger by seeing the members walking in the street. Beside, during the walks they perform different tasks. Firstly, they check whether backdoors and windows are closed and if necessary they inform the residents about the potential danger of open windows and doors. Secondly, they check whether suspicious persons and cars are in the neighborhood. Thirdly, youth that cause nuisance are being addressed by the members. This is done on a friendly way, based on the ideas of Hans Kaldenbach (Kaldenbach, 2009). The members participated in a curses organized by Lumens Groep. During the curses, the ideas of inter alia Hans Kaldenback were discussed and explained. Fourthly, the members check whether the public street lights work. Fifthly, the members check whether it is noticeable that the residents of a house are on vacation. Sixthly, neighborhood patrols, 3 to 5 times a year. This is the case when, for example, the curtains are closed for several consecutive days. During the walks, no attention is paid on the graffiti, because the neighborhood doesn’t have much graffiti on the walls, according to Peter van der Linden. Interesting is that all the activities do not have an effect on the social cohesion of neighborhood, according to Peter van der Linden. The neighborhood contains around 15.000 residents, of which only 100 are member of the neighborhood watch program.