different and created discursive gap between populations of those two regions (Unbegaun 1973, XXII). The political discourse in medieval Russia was expressed through importation of ancient archaisms as sources of their titles (Anderson 2013, 6:44). For example, the ruler of a city in Russia was referred to as which derived from Proto-Germanic title of similar meaning kniaz, (Anderson 2013, 6:44). By 1547 this title was replaced by another title of archaic kuningaz meaning, which gave the bearer greater and more powerful identity because it originated Tsar, from ancient Roman name (Anderson 2013, 6:44-45). There is nothing 'vertical' in the Caesar word but it is distant (larger or bigger) in a same way that the vertical is different from Tsar, horizontal. In order to impress its readers, Russian newspaper used components of Pravda Slavonic to describe the landing of (Unbegaun 1973, XXIV). “Church Soviet astronauts” For thousands of years Chinese rulers had successfully preserved authority on their subjects as a language implies nothing about dictatorship or even though “Chinese democracy” (Anderson 2013, 7:37). Part of their success was that the government used a discourse that people were not familiar with. Similar to ancient Sumerians, Chinese rulers also applied titles that transformed their identity and embodied them "bigger" in character (Anderson 2013, 7:14). In order to better understand this distinction it will be important to examine the "Table 1 - Ranks of Principality" borrowed from Gassmann's article. In this table (counselor), Dáfú Qínq (minister) and (prince) are all depicted as people possessing authority (Gassmann 2000, Jún 350). In order to find the notion of enlargement in this resemblance of (big-man) standing Dáfú higher than others it will be helpful to compare this concept to the Sumerian symbol of Lu-Gal (big/tall man). Similar to the ancient Sumerian symbols, ancient Chinese characters not only represented part of the word but stood for an entire character.
different and created discursive gap between populations of those two regions (Unbegaun 1973, XXII). The political discourse in medieval Russia was expressed through importation of ancient archaisms as sources of their titles (Anderson 2013, 6:44). For example, the ruler of a city in Russia was referred to as kniaz, which derived from Proto-Germanic title of similar meaning kuningaz (Anderson 2013, 6:44). By 1547 this title was replaced by another title of archaic meaning, Tsar, which gave the bearer greater and more powerful identity because it originated from ancient Roman name Caesar (Anderson 2013, 6:44-45). There is nothing 'vertical' in the word Tsar, but it is distant (larger or bigger) in a same way that the vertical is different from horizontal. In order to impress its readers, Russian newspaper Pravda used components of “Church Slavonic to describe the landing of Soviet astronauts” (Unbegaun 1973, XXIV). For thousands of years Chinese rulers had successfully preserved authority on their subjects even though “Chinese as a language implies nothing about dictatorship or democracy” (Anderson 2013, 7:37). Part of their success was that the government used a discourse that people were not familiar with. Similar to ancient Sumerians, Chinese rulers also applied titles that transformed their identity and embodied them "bigger" in character (Anderson 2013, 7:14). In order to better understand this distinction it will be important to examine the "Table 1 - Ranks of Principality" borrowed from Gassmann's article. In this table Dáfú (counselor), Qínq (minister) and Jún (prince) are all depicted as people possessing authority (Gassmann 2000, 350). In order to find the notion of enlargement in this resemblance of Dáfú (big-man) standing higher than others it will be helpful to compare this concept to the Sumerian symbol of Lu-Gal (big/tall man). Similar to the ancient Sumerian symbols, ancient Chinese characters not only represented part of the word but stood for an entire character.