3.3 Summary of appraisal against CSF domains The table below shows average scores (combining the 2 groups for in Workshop 1) for the options by each CSF and the figures that follows shows the average scores of each option against each CSF. 1 2 3 4 5 The proposed option will improve CSF 1 the health and wellbeing of the 3.00 2.50 0.50 3.00 3.00 population receiving services The proposed option will allow service to deliver improved clinical CSF 2 2.00 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.50 outcomes and maintain clinical standards The proposed option will allow Quality services to deliver a positive patient experience and allow patients to be CSF 3 2.00 1.50 1.00 2.00 2.00 as involved as they wish to be in decision-making about their care and outcomes The proposed option will improve staff satisfaction and facilitate CSF 4 1.50 1.00 1.50 2.50 2.00 appropriate recruitment, retention and training Total 8.50 7.00 4.50 10.00 9.50 The proposed option is deliverable CSF 5 within contractual and regulatory 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 obligations The proposed option appropriately CSF 6 recognises current and future 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 workforce requirements Feasibility The proposed option optimises the CSF 7 delivery of services on the available 2.50 1.50 -1.00 -1.50 0.00 estate The proposed option is feasible and deliverable within the time CSF 8 1.50 1.50 -1.50 -3.00 -3.00 constraints of the new Royal opening Total 7.50 6.50 0.00 -1.50 0.00 The proposed option helps to achieve recurrent financial CSF 9 1.00 0.50 -1.00 -3.00 -2.00 sustainability for orthopaedic Financial services sustainability The proposed option is financially CSF 10 deliverable given likely funding -1.00 -1.00 -2.00 -3.00 -3.00 constraints Total 0.00 -0.50 -3.00 -6.00 -5.00 The proposed option aligns with the Strategic fit CSF 11 goals of the Healthier Liverpool 2.00 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 Programme
3.3 Summary of appraisal against CSF domains The table below shows average scores (combining the 2 groups for in Workshop 1) for the options by each CSF and the figures that follows shows the average scores of each option against each CSF. 1 2 3 4 5 Quality CSF 1 The proposed option will improve the health and wellbeing of the population receiving services 3.00 2.50 0.50 3.00 3.00 CSF 2 The proposed option will allow service to deliver improved clinical outcomes and maintain clinical standards 2.00 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.50 CSF 3 The proposed option will allow services to deliver a positive patient experience and allow patients to be as involved as they wish to be in decision-making about their care and outcomes 2.00 1.50 1.00 2.00 2.00 CSF 4 The proposed option will improve staff satisfaction and facilitate appropriate recruitment, retention and training 1.50 1.00 1.50 2.50 2.00 Total 8.50 7.00 4.50 10.00 9.50 Feasibility CSF 5 The proposed option is deliverable within contractual and regulatory obligations 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CSF 6 The proposed option appropriately recognises current and future workforce requirements 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 CSF 7 The proposed option optimises the delivery of services on the available estate 2.50 1.50 -1.00 -1.50 0.00 CSF 8 The proposed option is feasible and deliverable within the time constraints of the new Royal opening 1.50 1.50 -1.50 -3.00 -3.00 Total 7.50 6.50 0.00 -1.50 0.00 Financial sustainability CSF 9 The proposed option helps to achieve recurrent financial sustainability for orthopaedic services 1.00 0.50 -1.00 -3.00 -2.00 CSF 10 The proposed option is financially deliverable given likely funding constraints -1.00 -1.00 -2.00 -3.00 -3.00 Total 0.00 -0.50 -3.00 -6.00 -5.00 Strategic fit CSF 11 The proposed option aligns with the goals of the Healthier Liverpool Programme 2.00 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.00