that the person complained about performs a stated reasonable act to redress any loss or damage suffered by a person because of the unlawful act. The Tribunal notes the language of the alternative proposals made by respondent and does not consider that the alternatives suggested by the respondent provide the for the humiliation suffered by the requisite ‘redress’ applicant. The Tribunal considers that the appropriate remedy pursuant to section 53E(2)(b) of the HRC Act is that the respondent accepts the applicant’s application for full voting membership for the years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and further applies the remedy to the 2015 year. The Tribunal also orders that the respondent records in the minutes of the next board of directors meeting that the board of decision of 12 December 2011 to reject the directors’ applicant’s membership application has been reversed and the membership applicant’s application has been accepted. Remedy reinstatement of the access to the respondent social media – applicant’s sites The Tribunal does not consider that the reinstatement of the access applicant’s to the respondent social media site is necessary to redress any loss or damage suffered by him. Remedy Apology – The applicant also seeks that the respondent publishes a written apology to the applicant on the web site and in the Croatian Herald. The Tribunal respondent’s agrees with the submissions that the precise content of the respondent’s political conviction is complex which makes the wording of an applicant’s apology unwieldy and further observes that the applicant had the benefit of a full page unbiased report in the Croatian Herald on 16 July 2014. The Tribunal accepts the submissions of the respondent that it is difficult to understand how precisely an apology might be economically and justly worded so as to accurately reflect the wrongdoing in a manner that might bring fair respondent’s relief to the applicant. The Tribunal does not consider that an apology is appropriate to redress any loss or damage suffered by the applicant in this case.
that the person complained about performs a stated reasonable act to redress any loss or damage suffered by a person because of the unlawful act. The Tribunal notes the language of the alternative proposals made by respondent and does not consider that the alternatives suggested by the respondent provide the requisite ‘redress’ for the humiliation suffered by the applicant. The Tribunal considers that the appropriate remedy pursuant to section 53E(2)(b) of the HRC Act is that the respondent accepts the applicant’s application for full voting membership for the years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and further applies the remedy to the 2015 year. The Tribunal also orders that the respondent records in the minutes of the next board of directors meeting that the board of directors’ decision of 12 December 2011 to reject the applicant’s membership application has been reversed and the applicant’s membership application has been accepted. Remedy – reinstatement of the applicant’s access to the respondent social media sites The Tribunal does not consider that the reinstatement of the applicant’s access to the respondent social media site is necessary to redress any loss or damage suffered by him. Remedy – Apology The applicant also seeks that the respondent publishes a written apology to the applicant on the respondent’s web site and in the Croatian Herald. The Tribunal agrees with the respondent’s submissions that the precise content of the applicant’s political conviction is complex which makes the wording of an apology unwieldy and further observes that the applicant had the benefit of a full page unbiased report in the Croatian Herald on 16 July 2014. The Tribunal accepts the submissions of the respondent that it is difficult to understand how precisely an apology might be economically and justly worded so as to accurately reflect the respondent’s wrongdoing in a manner that might bring fair relief to the applicant. The Tribunal does not consider that an apology is appropriate to redress any loss or damage suffered by the applicant in this case.