(i) Conservation and Five fragmented Forest Projected annual tons Technical reports, Risks: (i) ; CC-5: Outcome 5.2 advancement of carbon in Reserves plus three CO2savings of 23,056. including carbon Assumptions: (i) No Restoration and forests Protected Areas (691689 CO2 eq. accounting major natural disaster enhancement of carbon (mangroves) totaling 1664 10,000 ha avoided (hurricane, wildfire) stocks in forests and non ha and ca 3000 ha of degradation - 113948011 upsets implementation forest lands nominally protected CO2 eq. ) Potential total and forest regeneration forests with lack of active carbon benefit of 691,689 management, active tons CO2 over 30 years. degradation. Component 1: Enhanced land use planning and regulatory framework (as applied to NE Coast) Component 1 Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification Risks and Outcomes Assumptions Outcome C1.1: Land Use trends and No Land Use Plan; sand Land Use Plan adopted by Land Use maps, project Risks: (i) Illegal sand Integration of ecosystems patterns; extent of sand mining seriously affects Cabinet (end-of-project reports, technical reports; miners and squatters approach into legal and mining; extent of turtle nesting iguanas and target); Development Project from outside NE policy framework poaching of Grande Anse marine turtles; extensive Recommendations for Proposals project area largely and Louvet nesting loss of marine turtles policy and regulatory escape internal beaches; area cleared by (specifically Dermochelys framework reform community control slash-and-burn for coriacea) as a result of adopted; and GOSL monitoring charcoal production slaughters for meat and & enforcement and/or short cycle crops eggs; significant forest Sand mining and mechanisms; degradation by poaching of sea turtles Assumptions: (i) Land for charcoal and their eggs at Grand Use Plan remains production and/or short Anse and Louvet stopped; GOSL priority; (ii) cycle crops; ca 30% of forest clearing for Adequate community charcoal makers practice charcoal and agriculture buy-in and internal clear cutting on limited to selective control mechanisms abandoned estates cutting by are created; (iii) on their private Improved regulatory land (mid-term target); framework can be enforced where internal control does not apply (e.g. external squatters and sand miners); (iv) Au Picon Charcoal and
CC-5: Outcome 5.2 Restoration and enhancement of carbon stocks in forests and non forest lands (i) Conservation and advancement of carbon in forests Five fragmented Forest Reserves plus three Protected Areas (mangroves) totaling 1664 ha and ca 3000 ha of nominally protected forests with lack of active management, active degradation. Projected annual tons CO2savings of 23,056. (691689 CO2 eq. 10,000 ha avoided degradation - 113948011 CO2 eq. ) Potential total carbon benefit of 691,689 tons CO2 over 30 years. Technical reports, including carbon accounting Risks: (i) ; Assumptions: (i) No major natural disaster (hurricane, wildfire) upsets implementation and forest regeneration Component 1: Enhanced land use planning and regulatory framework (as applied to NE Coast) Component 1 Outcomes Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification Risks and Assumptions Outcome C1.1: Integration of ecosystems approach into legal and policy framework Land Use trends and patterns; extent of sand mining; extent of turtle poaching of Grande Anse and Louvet nesting beaches; area cleared by slash-and-burn for charcoal production and/or short cycle crops No Land Use Plan; sand mining seriously affects nesting iguanas and marine turtles; extensive loss of marine turtles (specifically Dermochelys coriacea) as a result of slaughters for meat and eggs; significant forest degradation by for charcoal production and/or short cycle crops; ca 30% of charcoal makers practice clear cutting on abandoned estates Land Use Plan adopted by Cabinet (end-of-project target); Recommendations for policy and regulatory framework reform adopted; Sand mining and poaching of sea turtles and their eggs at Grand Anse and Louvet stopped; forest clearing for charcoal and agriculture limited to selective cutting by on their private land (mid-term target); Land Use maps, project reports, technical reports; Development Project Proposals Risks: (i) Illegal sand miners and squatters from outside NE project area largely escape internal community control and GOSL monitoring & enforcement mechanisms; Assumptions: (i) Land Use Plan remains GOSL priority; (ii) Adequate community buy-in and internal control mechanisms are created; (iii) Improved regulatory framework can be enforced where internal control does not apply (e.g. external squatters and sand miners); (iv) Au Picon Charcoal and