Table 3 continued Gender role Measure / Coping Stressful Scoring Measure Author Population Situation Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics procedure (Dependent investigated (Independent Variable) Variable) McCall & College Participants BSRI short Purpose MANOVA Gender role differences found for: Struthers students asked to form / designed Sex × Gender role × support-focus 210) = 3.97, F(3, p<.009 (1994) imagine they Median-split measure. Self-esteem, feelings-focus 210) = 4.76, F(3, p<.003 To explore are upset or Measures independently for cognitive-focus 210) = 3.40, F(3, p<.02 the sad each coping category predictive effects of Post hoc analysis Fem. (M = 4.56) and andr. (M = 4.79) used 210) = 7.86, F(3, p<.0001 sex-role support more than masc. (M = 3.78) orientation individuals on emotion and Andr. (M = 4.71) used feeling-focused 210) = 3.75, < .01 F(3, p and coping more than fem. (M = 4.17) and und. (M = 4.21), and Andr. (M = 4.23) used coping more cognitive-focused coping than fem. categories (M = 3.98) individuals * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated, Note.
Table 3 continued Author Population Stressful Situation investigated Gender role Measure / Scoring procedure (Independent Variable) Coping Measure (Dependent Variable) Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics McCall & Struthers (1994) To explore the predictive effects of sex-role orientation on emotion and coping College students Participants asked to imagine they are upset or sad BSRI short form / Median-split Purpose designed measure. Measures and categories MANOVA Sex × Gender role × Self-esteem, independently for each coping category Post hoc analysis Gender role differences found for: support-focus feelings-focus cognitive-focus Fem. (M = 4.56) and andr. (M = 4.79) used support more than masc. (M = 3.78) individuals Andr. (M = 4.71) used feeling-focused coping more than fem. (M = 4.17) and und. (M = 4.21), and Andr. (M = 4.23) used more cognitive-focused coping than fem. (M = 3.98) individuals F(3, 210) = 3.97, p<.009 F(3, 210) = 4.76, p<.003 F(3, 210) = 3.40, p<.02 F(3, 210) = 7.86, p<.0001 F(3, 210) = 3.75, p < .01 Note. * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated,