Table 3 continued Gender role Measure / Coping Stressful Scoring Measure Author Population Situation Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics procedure (Dependent investigated (Independent Variable) Variable) Hirokawa, Undergraduate Participants MHF scale / ANOVA Gender role groups differed in their active Yagi, Miyata students asked to Tertile coping. (2004) freely masculinity skills Andr. females scored higher on active = 5.82, (p < .05) F(*) identify and coping compared to the other gender role stressful femininity groups. event scores Andr. males scored higher on active 5.18, (p < .05) F(*), coping compared to fem. and und. gender role groups. Huang, Zhu, College None BSRI / Trait Coping Chi-square test Andr. and masc. gender roles were related = 25.23 < .001 X²(3) Zheng, Zhang & and specified Median-split Style to more positive coping style use. Shiomi (2012) university Questionnaire students Jones, Undergraduate None BSRI Short COPE ANOVA There was a significant difference between 182) = 7.93, < .001 F(3, p Mendenhall students specified form / Student type × Sex × gender roles with coping & Myers Median-split Gender role And. individuals used more approach (2016) coping strategies compared to und. < .001 * p (Bem’s norms) Tukey’s HSD post hoc test City None BSRI, CISS ANOVA Groups differed significantly on the transport specified Polish display of: (2011) employees adaptation / Problem-orientated 304) = 10.9, < .001 F(3, p Median-split emotion-orientated 304) = 4.5, < .01 F(3, p social diversion 304) = 2.93, < .05 F(3, p * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated, Note.
Table 3 continued Author Population Stressful Situation investigated Gender role Measure / Scoring procedure (Independent Variable) Coping Measure (Dependent Variable) Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics Hirokawa, Yagi, Miyata (2004) Undergraduate students Participants asked to freely identify stressful event MHF scale / Tertile masculinity and femininity scores skills ANOVA Gender role groups differed in their active coping. Andr. females scored higher on active coping compared to the other gender role groups. Andr. males scored higher on active coping compared to fem. and und. gender role groups. F(*) = 5.82, (p < .05) F(*), 5.18, (p < .05) Huang, Zhu, Zheng, Zhang & Shiomi (2012) College and university students None specified BSRI / Median-split Trait Coping Style Questionnaire Chi-square test Andr. and masc. gender roles were related to more positive coping style use. X²(3) = 25.23 < .001 Jones, Mendenhall & Myers (2016) Undergraduate students None specified BSRI Short form / Median-split (Bem’s norms) COPE ANOVA Student type × Sex × Gender role Tukey’s HSD post hoc test There was a significant difference between gender roles with coping And. individuals used more approach coping strategies compared to und. F(3, 182) = 7.93, p < .001 * p < .001 (2011) City transport employees None specified BSRI, Polish adaptation / Median-split CISS ANOVA Groups differed significantly on the display of: Problem-orientated emotion-orientated social diversion F(3, 304) = 10.9, p < .001 F(3, 304) = 4.5, p < .01 F(3, 304) = 2.93, p < .05 Note. * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated,