completely and responses are more performance student’s thoroughly. indicative of a 6th or 7th exceeds the expectations grader than a 5th grader. of placed upon a typical 5th grade student. Deviation -1 0 0 This panelist was not aware of and did not Identified Issues N/A N/A review the rubrics for the constructed response section. Calibration Training-Student Sample #2 Anchored Proficient Performance Level Panelist Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Performance Level Proficient Proficient Proficient Assigned Though this student misses some questions, especially in the The multiple choice constructed response section is nearly perfect, This sample is also section, they are questions but the writing section Performance Level impressive, but much less that I would not expect bogs down this student’s Rationale so than the “Advanced” most 5th graders to sample. This sample sample. answer correctly, while seems to be in the most of the correct of the “middle pack.” answers are indicative of typical 5th grade ELA knowledge. Deviation 0 0 0 Identified Issues N/A N/A N/A Calibration Training-Student Sample #3 Anchored Below Proficient Performance Level Panelist Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Performance Level Proficient Below Proficient Below Proficient Assigned This sample contains Inconsistent thought Nearly 50% multiple more errors than the last, process in evidence-based choice questions and Performance Level but the knowledge SR question clusters; this about 75% of constructed Rationale displayed is still is indicative of response questions are satisfactory for a 5th reading answered incorrectly. grader. comprehension. Deviation +1 0 0 This panelist did not examine sequences of Identified Issues N/A N/A incorrect answers; incorrectly answered
completely and thoroughly. responses are more indicative of a 6th or 7th grader than a 5th grader. student’s performance exceeds the expectations of placed upon a typical 5th grade student. Deviation 0 0 -1 Identified Issues N/A N/A This panelist was not aware of and did not review the rubrics for the constructed response section. Calibration Training-Student Sample #2 Anchored Performance Level Proficient Panelist Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Performance Level Assigned Proficient Proficient Proficient Performance Level Rationale This sample is also impressive, but much less so than the “Advanced” sample. The multiple choice section is nearly perfect, but the writing section bogs down this student’s sample. This sample seems to be in the “middle of the pack.” Though this student misses some questions, especially in the constructed response section, they are questions that I would not expect most 5th graders to answer correctly, while most of the correct answers are indicative of typical 5th grade ELA knowledge. Deviation 0 0 0 Identified Issues N/A N/A N/A Calibration Training-Student Sample #3 Anchored Performance Level Below Proficient Panelist Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Performance Level Assigned Proficient Below Proficient Below Proficient Performance Level Rationale This sample contains more errors than the last, but the knowledge displayed is still satisfactory for a 5th grader. Inconsistent thought process in evidence-based SR question clusters; this is indicative of reading comprehension. Nearly 50% multiple choice questions and about 75% of constructed response questions are answered incorrectly. Deviation +1 0 0 Identified Issues This panelist did not examine sequences of incorrect answers; incorrectly answered N/A N/A