their attention to the militia colonels. The formerly reliable François Costeblanche was replaced by Jehan-Baptiste de Machault, but attempts to remove Claude Daubray were unsuccessful. In summer, the tried once again to make progress at the institutional level. Thinking Seize ahead to the Estates-General that Mayenne habitually promised but never seemed to deliver they considered but failed to agree upon whom they would elect as king. In the August municipal contest, despite forcing a second electoral assembly to be convened, and despite the consolation prize of securing the resignations of Martin Langlois and Robert Desprez, the failed to prevent moderates from holding the As Seize Bureau de la Ville. Mayenne’s the end of the year approached, simmering tensions bolied over. me noie et ne puis it is with cry of despair amidst a ‘Je m’en sauver’; Barnabé Brisson’s political storm that we approach a critical juncture in the history of the In Ligue. 1591, Brisson and two other lawyers Claude Larcher and Jean Tardif were – – arrested by the charged with conspiracy, and summarily executed. It was an act of Seize, intimidation that Mayenne, could not ignore. In December, lieutenant-général du Royaume, the duke arrived in Paris to deal with the perpetrators, four of whom were hanged. Thereafter the existed only on the sufferance. Seize duke’s We consider this reverse in fortunes by comparing the accounts left by Rozée and Ligue Pierre de These two contemporary commentators, respectively and avocat L’Estoile. had very different views. Rozée produced his cautious but firm defence of the audiencier, years after the dust had settled. In lively and engaging journal we have the Seize L’Estoile’s
their attention to the militia colonels. The formerly reliable François Costeblanche was replaced by Jehan-Baptiste de Machault, but attempts to remove Claude Daubray were unsuccessful. In summer, the Seize tried once again to make progress at the institutional level. Thinking ahead to the Estates-General that Mayenne habitually promised but never seemed to deliver they considered but failed to agree upon whom they would elect as king. In the August municipal contest, despite forcing a second electoral assembly to be convened, and despite the consolation prize of securing the resignations of Martin Langlois and Robert Desprez, the Seize failed to prevent Mayenne’s moderates from holding the Bureau de la Ville. As the end of the year approached, simmering tensions bolied over. ‘Je me noie et ne m’en puis sauver’; it is with Barnabé Brisson’s cry of despair amidst a political storm that we approach a critical juncture in the history of the Ligue. In 1591, Brisson and two other lawyers – Claude Larcher and Jean Tardif – were arrested by the Seize, charged with conspiracy, and summarily executed. It was an act of intimidation that Mayenne, lieutenant-général du Royaume, could not ignore. In December, the duke arrived in Paris to deal with the perpetrators, four of whom were hanged. Thereafter the Seize existed only on the duke’s sufferance. We consider this reverse in Ligue fortunes by comparing the accounts left by Rozée and Pierre de L’Estoile. These two contemporary commentators, respectively avocat and audiencier, had very different views. Rozée produced his cautious but firm defence of the Seize years after the dust had settled. In L’Estoile’s lively and engaging journal we have the