References Chiang, H., Liu, C., Lee, S., & Shih, Y. (2010). Effect of assistive reading software on (pp. 473-480, Rep. high school students with learning disabilities: A pilot study No. 1051-9815). IOS Press. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1376 Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. approaches. Elkind, J. (1998, January). Computer reading machines for poor readers. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.kurzweiledu.com/pub/documentation/efficacy.pdf Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Boudousquie, A., Copeland, K., Young, V., Kalinowski, S., & Vaughn, S. (2006). Effects of accommodations on high-stakes testing for students with reading disabilities. 136-150. Exceptional Children, 72(2), Floyd, K. K., & Judge, S. (2012). The Efficacy of assistive technology on reading comprehension for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Assistive 48-64. Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8(1), Fullen, M., & Donnelly, K. (2013, July). Alive in the Swamp: Assessing digital innovations in education. Retrieved from education Gay, L. R., Airasian, P. W., & Mills, G. E. (2012). Educational research: Competencies Boston: Pearson. for analysis and applications. Hecker, L., Burns, L., Katz, L., Elkind, J., & Elkind, K. (2002). Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders. Annals of Dyslexia, 52(1), 243-272. doi: 10.1007/s11881-002-0015-8
References Chiang, H., Liu, C., Lee, S., & Shih, Y. (2010). Effect of assistive reading software on high school students with learning disabilities: A pilot study (pp. 473-480, Rep. No. 1051-9815). IOS Press. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1376 Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Elkind, J. (1998, January). Computer reading machines for poor readers. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.kurzweiledu.com/pub/documentation/efficacy.pdf Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Boudousquie, A., Copeland, K., Young, V., Kalinowski, S., & Vaughn, S. (2006). Effects of accommodations on high-stakes testing for students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(2), 136-150. Floyd, K. K., & Judge, S. (2012). The Efficacy of assistive technology on reading comprehension for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8(1), 48-64. Fullen, M., & Donnelly, K. (2013, July). Alive in the Swamp: Assessing digital innovations in education. Retrieved from Gay, L. R., Airasian, P. W., & Mills, G. E. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Boston: Pearson. Hecker, L., Burns, L., Katz, L., Elkind, J., & Elkind, K. (2002). Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders. Annals of Dyslexia, 52(1), 243-272. doi: 10.1007/s11881-002-0015-8 education