Appendix 4: Results Framework Mid Term Targets to be established at Project Inception – Iyanola - Natural Resource Management of the NE Coast Approach Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification Risks and Assumptions BD-1 Outcome 1.1: (i) IUCN Category of Forest reserves (ca (i) Majority of currently Technical and financial Risks: (i) Private Improved management protection; (ii) area (ha) 1600ha) with few undesignated Pas are reports; international absentee land owners effectiveness of existing under protection; (iii) fragmented PAs of formalized; databases on PAs and may not be and new protected areas METT Tracking Tool international recognition (ii) Improved species they contain cooperative; (ii) a (terrestrial: 21 ha), with management major development information gaps and effectiveness and METT at mid term and (resort, road) is minimal management financial sustainability of final approved within the (e.g. status "proposed"): existing protected areas project area; 18 terrestrial and marine encompassed within Assumptions: (i) PA protected areas with proposed Iyanola management remains IUCN category not National Park area (5,090 GOSL priority; (ii) reported, 5 with IUCN hectares) designation as category VI; (iii) METT Scores Protected Area increased by 20% over leverages improved baseline scores management BD-2: Outcome 2.1: Extent/Acreage of land No adopted Land Use Adopted Land Use Plan Land Use Plan, Risks: (i) Private Increase in sustainably and seascape under Plan and enhanced regulatory management plans, absentee land owners managed landscapes and sustainable environmental framework for the NE technical reports, sales may lack interest in seascapes that integrate management Ecosystem Services not Coast incorporates figures of target sustainable land biodiversity conservation. taken into account in biodiversity and community members; management METT Tracking Tool developments ecosystem services Ministry of Agriculture and approaches; (ii) valuation; Ministry of Sustainable squatters and sand Development Reports and miners may not be Increase size of landscape Documents from NE communities; by 25-35% (mid-term) or (iii) a major 50% of total acreage METT at mid term and development (resort, under management; final road) is approved within the project Minimal income Production of at least 3 area; Assumptions: (i) generating alternatives to biodiversity friendly Adequate community unsustainable land use goods and services (with buy-in and internal practices increased income by control mechanisms 10%); are created; (ii) Improved regulatory
Appendix 4: Results Framework – Mid Term Targets to be established at Project Inception Iyanola - Natural Resource Management of the NE Coast Approach Indicator Baseline Target Sources of verification Risks and Assumptions BD-1 Outcome 1.1: Improved management effectiveness of existing and new protected areas (i) IUCN Category of protection; (ii) area (ha) under protection; (iii) METT Tracking Tool Forest reserves (ca 1600ha) with few fragmented PAs of international recognition (terrestrial: 21 ha), with information gaps and minimal management (e.g. status "proposed"): 18 terrestrial and marine protected areas with IUCN category not reported, 5 with IUCN category VI; (i) Majority of currently undesignated Pas are formalized; (ii) Improved management effectiveness and financial sustainability of existing protected areas encompassed within proposed Iyanola National Park area (5,090 hectares) (iii) METT Scores increased by 20% over baseline scores Technical and financial reports; international databases on PAs and species they contain METT at mid term and final Risks: (i) Private absentee land owners may not be cooperative; (ii) a major development (resort, road) is approved within the project area; Assumptions: (i) PA management remains GOSL priority; (ii) designation as Protected Area leverages improved management BD-2: Outcome 2.1: Increase in sustainably managed landscapes and seascapes that integrate biodiversity conservation. Extent/Acreage of land and seascape under sustainable environmental management METT Tracking Tool No adopted Land Use Plan Ecosystem Services not taken into account in developments Minimal income generating alternatives to unsustainable land use practices Adopted Land Use Plan and enhanced regulatory framework for the NE Coast incorporates biodiversity and ecosystem services valuation; Increase size of landscape by 25-35% (mid-term) or 50% of total acreage under management; Production of at least 3 biodiversity friendly goods and services (with increased income by 10%); Land Use Plan, management plans, technical reports, sales figures of target community members; Ministry of Agriculture and Ministry of Sustainable Development Reports and Documents METT at mid term and final Risks: (i) Private absentee land owners may lack interest in sustainable land management approaches; (ii) squatters and sand miners may not be from NE communities; (iii) a major development (resort, road) is approved within the project area; Assumptions: (i) Adequate community buy-in and internal control mechanisms are created; (ii) Improved regulatory