1. What should the new VEET target be? No response Other (please specify a target and length): [Required if 'Other' selected] * 1a. Please outline why you prefer the Lighting Council Australia supports a longer term than 5 years to provide some level of target you identified, or why you selected "No response": certainty to the VEET scheme No Comment. Not a core business activity of 2. Comments are invited on the modelling approach used to determine Lighting Council Australia. Unable to recommend value. the costs and benefits of the VEET scheme. Is there any additional data or information that should be considered? 3. Which greenhouse gas coefficient No response should be used to quantify the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions achieved by the VEET scheme? 3a. Please outline why you believe this Not a core business activity of Lighting Council Australia option is preferred, or why you selected "No response": No comment. Not a core business activity of 4. The Department has valued greenhouse gas emissions reductions Lighting Council Australia attributed to the VEET scheme by adopting a carbon valuation series that was produced by the Federal Climate Change Authority as part of its 2014 Targets and Progress Review.Please outline whether you think this approach is appropriate for valuing greenhouse gas emissions reductions over the period 2016 to 2050? 5. Is there a case to exclude any business No response sector(s) from participation in the VEET scheme? 5a. Please outline why this is your preferred option, and comment on how this should be implemented: 5b. Please outline why this is your preferred option: No 6. Should the VEET scheme be amended to better ensure support for low income households?
1. What should the new VEET target be? No response Other (please specify a target and length): [Required if 'Other' selected] * 1a. Please outline why you prefer the target you identified, or why you selected "No response": Lighting Council Australia supports a longer term than 5 years to provide some level of certainty to the VEET scheme 2. Comments are invited on the modelling approach used to determine the costs and benefits of the VEET scheme. Is there any additional data or information that should be considered? No Comment. Not a core business activity of Lighting Council Australia. Unable to recommend value. 3. Which greenhouse gas coefficient should be used to quantify the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions achieved by the VEET scheme? No response 3a. Please outline why you believe this option is preferred, or why you selected "No response": Not a core business activity of Lighting Council Australia 4. The Department has valued greenhouse gas emissions reductions attributed to the VEET scheme by adopting a carbon valuation series that was produced by the Federal Climate Change Authority as part of its 2014 Targets and Progress Review.Please outline whether you think this approach is appropriate for valuing greenhouse gas emissions reductions over the period 2016 to 2050? No comment. Not a core business activity of Lighting Council Australia 5. Is there a case to exclude any business sector(s) from participation in the VEET scheme? No response 5a. Please outline why this is your preferred option, and comment on how this should be implemented: 5b. Please outline why this is your preferred option: 6. Should the VEET scheme be amended to better ensure support for low income households? No