International Baccalaureate Students who passed two IB exams were placed in the level, indicating that “Prepared” the IB program was rigorous and academically challenging. Dual Enrollment Among students who took two dual enrollment courses, 48 percent scored on “Ready” the EAP for ELA. Among those who took three dual enrollment courses, 61 percent scored Given the strong alignment of this measure with college preparedness, “Ready.” it was agreed that students who complete two semester or three quarters of college coursework with a grade of C- or better (and received college credit) should be placed in the level of the CCI. There was no need, it was concluded, to supplement “Prepared” Dual Enrollment with an additional measure. Data Supporting the Placement Settings In order to demonstrate the soundness of the CCI model and its measures, the CDE conducted analyses comparing results from the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and performance on other CCI measures. The results, based on student data from the Class of 2016, are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 ELA: ELA: Math: Math: Number Number & Number & Number & Number & of Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Prepared of of of of CCI Criteria Students Students Students Students Students Who Met Who Who Who Who CCI Received Received Received Received Criteria Level 1 or Level 3 or Level 1 or Level 3 or 2 4 2 4 Two AP 59,071 7,719 53,325 64,818 2,164 (3%) Exams (91%) (12%) (82%) Two IB 3,580 3,163 3,868 141 (4%) 537 (14%) Exams (93%) (82%) Dual Enrollment 725 79 (11%) 609 (84%) 262 (36%) 431 (59%) (One Year) a–g plus Smarter 136,352 40,570 99,664 Balanced 140,234 3,882 (3%) (97%) (29%) (71%) Summative Assessments a–g plus 7,009 26,729 16,591 17,009 CTE 35,045 (20%) (76%) (47%) (49%) Pathway
International Baccalaureate Students who passed two IB exams were placed in the “Prepared” level, indicating that the IB program was rigorous and academically challenging. Dual Enrollment Among students who took two dual enrollment courses, 48 percent scored “Ready” on the EAP for ELA. Among those who took three dual enrollment courses, 61 percent scored “Ready.” Given the strong alignment of this measure with college preparedness, it was agreed that students who complete two semester or three quarters of college coursework with a grade of C- or better (and received college credit) should be placed in the “Prepared” level of the CCI. There was no need, it was concluded, to supplement Dual Enrollment with an additional measure. Data Supporting the Placement Settings In order to demonstrate the soundness of the CCI model and its measures, the CDE conducted analyses comparing results from the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and performance on other CCI measures. The results, based on student data from the Class of 2016, are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 CCI Criteria Number of Prepared Students Who Met CCI Criteria ELA: Number & Percentage of Students Who Received Level 1 or 2 ELA: Number & Percentage of Students Who Received Level 3 or 4 Math: Number & Percentage of Students Who Received Level 1 or 2 Math: Number & Percentage of Students Who Received Level 3 or 4 Two AP Exams 64,818 2,164 (3%) 59,071 (91%) 7,719 (12%) 53,325 (82%) Two IB Exams 3,868 141 (4%) 3,580 (93%) 537 (14%) 3,163 (82%) Dual Enrollment (One Year) 725 79 (11%) 609 (84%) 262 (36%) 431 (59%) a–g plus Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments 140,234 3,882 (3%) 136,352 (97%) 40,570 (29%) 99,664 (71%) a–g plus CTE Pathway 35,045 7,009 (20%) 26,729 (76%) 16,591 (47%) 17,009 (49%)