Medium 35% to less than 55% Low 10% to less than 35% Very Low Less than 10% Table 2 displays the percentile distribution. Table 2: Percentile Distribution for the Status Cut Scores Percentile Percent Prepared for College/Career Status Level 5 Very Low 2.1 10 Very Low 5.6 14.8 Low 10.0 15 Low 10.9 17.3 Low 14.1 20 Low 17.6 25 Low 25.5 30 Low 29.3 35 Low 32.5 40 Medium 35.0 41.8 Medium 35.1 45 Medium 37.1 50 Medium 39.8 55 Medium 42.4 60 Medium 45.2 65 Medium 47.8 70 Medium 51.2 Medium 75 54.4 75.5 High 55.0 80 High 58.0 83.4 High 61.4 85 High 63.0 90 High 68.3 91.4 Very High 70.0 The Fall 2017 Dashboard reflects data from the of 2016. Because only one year of Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment results were available for the CCI, only Status was reported for this indicator. The CCI reported Status for all students, as well as for each student group, including the number and percent of students in the Class of 2016 who met the level. “Prepared” To provide additional information to LEAs and schools, the CDE produced a detailed report that indicated which CCI criteria were met by students in both the and “Prepared”
Medium 35% to less than 55% Low 10% to less than 35% Very Low Less than 10% Table 2 displays the percentile distribution. Table 2: Percentile Distribution for the Status Cut Scores Percentile Percent Prepared for College/Career Status Level 5 2.1 Very Low 10 5.6 Very Low 14.8 10.0 Low 15 10.9 Low 17.3 14.1 Low 20 17.6 Low 25 25.5 Low 30 29.3 Low 35 32.5 Low 40 35.0 Medium 41.8 35.1 Medium 45 37.1 Medium 50 39.8 Medium 55 42.4 Medium 60 45.2 Medium 65 47.8 Medium 70 51.2 Medium 75 54.4 Medium 75.5 55.0 High 80 58.0 High 83.4 61.4 High 85 63.0 High 90 68.3 High 91.4 70.0 Very High The Fall 2017 Dashboard reflects data from the of 2016. Because only one year of Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment results were available for the CCI, only Status was reported for this indicator. The CCI reported Status for all students, as well as for each student group, including the number and percent of students in the Class of 2016 who met the “Prepared” level. To provide additional information to LEAs and schools, the CDE produced a detailed report that indicated which CCI criteria were met by students in both the “Prepared” and