8131 Matthew 70.34 Too many of the Reconcile the Revise generally – Fischer entries for column in 9.4.2.200 TWT agree with "Description when element with Table comment - TGax transmitted by a TWT 10-19a--TWT setup editor shall make scheduling STA, Wake exchange the changes shown TBTT Negotiation command in 11-17/0777r6 subfield = 1" have interpretation - that are marked "NA" - according to noting that Table with CID 8131. Table 10-19a--TWT 10-19a is the more setup exchange correct one. command interpretation, there should be more entries with something other than NA here. 8144 Matthew 69.36 The TWT Channel Change the TWT Revise – Fischer should be or 1 Channel count changes have because for bTWT, the in figure 9-589av caused a separate TWT channel is not TWT element diagram to be present format to read "0 or created, so the 1" instead of "1" change is effected in spirit, but differently than suggested - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r6 that are marked with CID 8144. 8196 69.30 Comparing the IE in clarify Reject the text – Figure 9-589av to the explains the one in 11ah draft, it difference, in that seems that this TWT the Broadcast bit is element is a new reserved for S1G, element by adding and it explains how Broadcast TWT ID. the format changes The question is; is this dependent on the a new IE? If not then I of the don't understand what Broadcast subfield. format is now used for Between these two ah facts, the format for each case should be clear. 8197 Osama 69.30 are sub-fields in Clarify Reject the – the TWT IE having subfields are of variable length. When different length for repeating for each each depends TWT parameter, how on the settings of the information can be other subfields, so decoded given the that the size, variabe length of some format, length, etc of the sub-fields? of each repeated set of subfields is fully described by the bits within that set of subfields.
8131 Matthew Fischer 70.34 Too many of the entries for column "Description when transmitted by a TWT scheduling STA, Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield = 1" have "NA" - according to Table 10-19a--TWT setup exchange command interpretation, there should be more entries with something other than NA here. Reconcile the in 9.4.2.200 TWT element with Table 10-19a--TWT setup exchange command interpretation - noting that Table 10-19a is the more correct one. Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r6 that are marked with CID 8131. 8144 Matthew Fischer 69.36 The TWT Channel should be or 1 because for bTWT, the TWT channel is not present Change the TWT Channel count in figure 9-589av TWT element format to read "0 or 1" instead of "1" Revise – changes have caused a separate diagram to be created, so the change is effected in spirit, but differently than suggested - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r6 that are marked with CID 8144. 8196 69.30 Comparing the IE in Figure 9-589av to the one in 11ah draft, it seems that this TWT element is a new element by adding Broadcast TWT ID. The question is; is this a new IE? If not then I don't understand what format is now used for ah clarify Reject – the text explains the difference, in that the Broadcast bit is reserved for S1G, and it explains how the format changes dependent on the of the Broadcast subfield. Between these two facts, the format for each case should be clear. 8197 Osama 69.30 are sub-fields in the TWT IE having variable length. When repeating for each TWT parameter, how the information can be decoded given the variabe length of some of the sub-fields? Clarify Reject – the subfields are of different length for each depends on the settings of other subfields, so that the size, format, length, etc of each repeated set of subfields is fully described by the bits within that set of subfields.