802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8436 "10.49 System Move subclause "10.49 Rejected- information update Channel selection methods 10.49 (System procedure": this for an S1G BSS" to a information update subclause specifies MAC location between "Basic procedure) is describing function operation, not S1G BSS functionality"(the the system information just MLME features. But new 9.42.1) and "Channel update mechanism. this operation is part of selection methods" (the new the S1G operation, so 9.42.3). Also rename this Its reference section is make it a subclause of the subclause "S1G BSS 10.2.2.17 (TIM "S1G BSS operation" channel selection methods". Broadcast) in IEEE clause. After moving the 802.11 base "S1G BSS operation" specification. subclause from 10.50 to the new 9.42, make the The BRC can not identify current 10.49 subclause which operation is the new 9.42.2. considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8437 "10.50 S1G BSS Move the full subclause Rejected- operation": this subclause "10.50 S1G BSS operation", 10.50 (S1G BSS specifies basic MAC except for 10.50.7, to a new operation) is describing functionality, not just subclause 9.42. the BSS operation. MLME features, so it does Its reference section is not belong in the MLME 10.40 (VHT BSS clause. operation) and 10.43 TVHT BSS functionality) in IEEE 802.11 base specification.
802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It fails to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8436 "10.49 System information update procedure": this subclause specifies MAC function operation, not just MLME features. But this operation is part of the S1G operation, so make it a subclause of the "S1G BSS operation" clause. After moving the "S1G BSS operation" subclause from 10.50 to the new 9.42, make the current 10.49 subclause the new 9.42.2. Move subclause "10.49 Channel selection methods for an S1G BSS" to a location between "Basic S1G BSS functionality"(the new 9.42.1) and "Channel selection methods" (the new 9.42.3). Also rename this subclause "S1G BSS channel selection methods". Rejected- 10.49 (System information update procedure) is describing the system information update mechanism. Its reference section is 10.2.2.17 (TIM Broadcast) in IEEE 802.11 base specification. The BRC can not identify which operation is considered as the MAC functionality. So, the comment fails to identify a specific issue to be addressed. It to identify changes in sufficient detail so that the specific wording of the changes that will satisfy the commenter can be determined. 8437 "10.50 S1G BSS operation": this subclause specifies basic MAC functionality, not just MLME features, so it does not belong in the MLME clause. Move the full subclause "10.50 S1G BSS operation", except for 10.50.7, to a new subclause 9.42. Rejected- 10.50 (S1G BSS operation) is describing the BSS operation. Its reference section is 10.40 (VHT BSS operation) and 10.43 TVHT BSS functionality) in IEEE 802.11 base specification.