Charitable Community & Government Religious Total (32 facilities) Private (43 facilities) (37 facilities) (175 facilities) (63 facilities) Number Number Number Number population Number facilities facilities facilities facilities facilities Result Result Result Result total % of of of of of of Operating EBITDA>$0 20 32 17 19 88 Average occupancy 100% 99.6% 100% 100% 100% Average # beds 56 46 37 40 45 Operating EBITDA<$0 12 31 26 18 87 Average occupancy 64.9% 83.3% 78.7% 83.9% 77.8% Average # beds 34 37 25 36 33 Total 32 63 43 37 100% 175 Approximately 62.5 per cent (20 from 32) of charitable facilities derived a positive Operating EBITDA. In comparison, only 39.5 per cent (17 from 43) of government facilities derived a positive Operating EBITDA. The proportion of facilities with positive Operating EBITDA was higher for facilities with higher average occupancy. The tables below highlight that with the inclusion of the non-operating result (including financing), more facilities achieved a positive Facility EBITDA prpa. Table 24 - Facility EBITDA analysis – by location Inner Outer Remote / Very Remote Total Regional Regional (26 facilities) (175 facilities) (30 facilities) (119 facilities) Number Number Number population Number facilities facilities facilities facilities Result Result Result total % of of of of of Facility EBITDA >$0 24 71 14 109 Average occupancy 100% 90.7% 99.2% Average # beds 44 39 42 35 Facility EBITDA < $0 6 48 12 66 Average occupancy 77.6% 82.5% 79.2% Average # beds 34 33 34 29 Total 30 119 26 100% 175 The proportion of facilities with positive Facility EBITDA prpa was higher for facilities in inner regional locations (24 from 30 facilities) compared with outer regional, and remote and very remote
Charitable (32 facilities) Community & Private (63 facilities) Government (43 facilities) Religious (37 facilities) Total (175 facilities) Result Number of facilities Result Number of facilities Result Number of facilities Result Number of facilities % of population total Number of facilities Operating EBITDA>$0 Average occupancy Average # beds 100% 56 20 99.6% 46 32 100% 37 17 100% 40 19 100% 45 88 Operating EBITDA<$0 Average occupancy Average # beds 64.9% 34 12 83.3% 37 31 78.7% 25 26 83.9% 36 18 77.8% 33 87 Total 32 63 43 37 100% 175 Approximately 62.5 per cent (20 from 32) of charitable facilities derived a positive Operating EBITDA. In comparison, only 39.5 per cent (17 from 43) of government facilities derived a positive Operating EBITDA. The proportion of facilities with positive Operating EBITDA was higher for facilities with higher average occupancy. The tables below highlight that with the inclusion of the non-operating result (including financing), more facilities achieved a positive Facility EBITDA prpa. Table 24 - Facility EBITDA analysis – by location Inner Regional (30 facilities) Outer Regional (119 facilities) Remote / Very Remote (26 facilities) Total (175 facilities) Result Number of facilities Result Number of facilities Result Number of facilities % of population total Number of facilities Facility EBITDA >$0 Average occupancy Average # beds 35 24 100% 44 71 90.7% 39 14 99.2% 42 109 Facility EBITDA < $0 Average occupancy Average # beds 29 6 77.6% 34 48 82.5% 33 12 79.2% 34 66 Total 30 119 26 100% 175 The proportion of facilities with positive Facility EBITDA prpa was higher for facilities in inner regional locations (24 from 30 facilities) compared with outer regional, and remote and very remote