for mapping at finer resolution. This feedback has been incorporated into the model.” for recreation. Scoring “Positive should be refined in a second Not applicable yet for air quality regulation.” Stakeholders have seen the method beneficial and the results will be considered in planning. officials are very interested in “Park the tool and were willing to score model inputs.” InVEST: INVEST tools have been “The identified as complex.” QuickScan: tool is potentially very workshop was a success with 11 “The “The powerful, but the time frame for local stakeholders attending and the workshop was not sufficient.” evaluating the tool. Questionnaires currently being analyzed.” so easy to use as expected, “Not many technical difficulties.” a first test so far which was “Just received well (by three well-trained stakeholders).” feedback from “Positive stakeholders.” (2x) QuickScan - methodology and the from the research team:] “The “[Remark ECOPLAN-Quickscan: ECOPLAN-Quickscan-results from At the moment, the quickscan results another, similar project were were not yet presented to the wider presented to VLM. A lot of group of stakeholders involved in the interesting feedback was project. From the viewpoint of gathered in order to fine-tune or operationalization, it would be good adapt the tool if possible.” to do so later on in the project.” (2x) method has caused a very reaction was very positive and Public Participatory GIS “This “The (PPGIS): positive reaction of OpenNESS the groups and workshops were partners in the training fun.” (developed by Ignacio Palomo and Berta Martín-López) in Edinburgh in November 2014.” Deliberative mapping: method […]did start an approach was considered very “The “This interesting discussion on the useful as it provided a valuable different views regarding ES.” exercise of cooperation and learning between stakeholders.” BBN (and Spatial BBN): positive.” interaction so far.” “Initially “Positive in general the data presented to the “[…] “[…] parameterization is going well.” stakeholders at the CAB meeting was only preliminary. They were tools have been identified “BBN supportive of the method and have as good means to explore provided a lot of useful data and suitability, values, conflicts, expert advice to feed into the model.”
for mapping at finer resolution. This feedback has been incorporated into the model.” “Positive for recreation. Scoring should be refined in a second Not applicable yet for air quality regulation.” Stakeholders have seen the method beneficial and the results will be considered in planning. “Park officials are very interested in the tool and were willing to score model inputs.” InVEST: “The INVEST tools have been identified as complex.” QuickScan: “The tool is potentially very powerful, but the time frame for the workshop was not sufficient.” “Not so easy to use as expected, many technical difficulties.” “The workshop was a success with 11 local stakeholders attending and evaluating the tool. Questionnaires currently being analyzed.” “Just a first test so far which was received well (by three well-trained stakeholders).” “Positive feedback from stakeholders.” (2x) QuickScan - ECOPLAN-Quickscan: “The methodology and the ECOPLAN-Quickscan-results from another, similar project were presented to VLM. A lot of interesting feedback was gathered in order to fine-tune or adapt the tool if possible.” “[Remark from the research team:] At the moment, the quickscan results were not yet presented to the wider group of stakeholders involved in the project. From the viewpoint of operationalization, it would be good to do so later on in the project.” (2x) Public Participatory GIS (PPGIS): “This method has caused a very positive reaction of OpenNESS partners in the training (developed by Ignacio Palomo and Berta Martín-López) in Edinburgh in November 2014.” “The reaction was very positive and the groups and workshops were fun.” Deliberative mapping: “The method […]did start an interesting discussion on the different views regarding ES.” “This approach was considered very useful as it provided a valuable exercise of cooperation and learning between stakeholders.” BBN (and Spatial BBN): “Initially positive.” “[…] in general the parameterization is going well.” “BBN tools have been identified as good means to explore suitability, values, conflicts, “Positive interaction so far.” “[…] data presented to the stakeholders at the CAB meeting was only preliminary. They were supportive of the method and have provided a lot of useful data and expert advice to feed into the model.”