Mark for motion Youhan KIM (Qualcomm) joined the WebEx call. CID 5887, 5888, 5889, 5890, 5885, 5886 (MAC) – Review comments and proposed changes At the same general location in the draft. Proposed resolution to CID 5886 (MAC): Accepted Mark Ready for Motion Proposed resolution to CIDs 5885, 5887, 5888, 5889, 5890 (MAC): Revised: Incorporate the changes in 11-15/760r2() as shown for resolutions to CIDs 5885, 5887, 5888, “Proposed 5889, 5890” and delete lines 1311.48 through 1311.55 Discussion concern on the technical change that limits the – STA vs Type of PPDU transmission. Discuss the meaning of HT STA transmits PPDU vs STA transmits HT PPDU What is aPPDUMaxTime definition? See 2568.40; see 2547.42 – Concern on the breaking of a Single MAC Single – PHY, but we may be separating it based on PHY. Discussion on where the limit is applied and how to describe it in text. Two different ways to interpret the changes is causing a bit of in debating the solution. Question on how implementations actually implement this part? Not sure at this moment. Where is the aPPDUMaxTime get its value? Part of the disagreement is if The PHY-TXTIME.Confirm is per PPDU type. After the long debate proposal to go with the proposed – resolution and then see what the debate may be later. Mark Ready for Motion CID 5891 (MAC) Review comment and proposed changes. Disagreement on adding the defined in 21-31” “as Do we need a reference or a normative directive. Propose Resolution: Revised. Add to the end of the cited sentence Table 21-31)”. “(see Mark Ready for Motion CID 5893, 5136, 6449 (MAC) – Review comments Proposed Resolution 5136 and 6449: Accepted
Mark for motion Youhan KIM (Qualcomm) joined the WebEx call. CID 5887, 5888, 5889, 5890, 5885, 5886 – (MAC) Review comments and proposed changes At the same general location in the draft. Proposed resolution to CID 5886 (MAC): Accepted Mark Ready for Motion Proposed resolution to CIDs 5885, 5887, 5888, 5889, 5890 (MAC): Revised: Incorporate the changes in 11-15/760r2() as shown for “Proposed resolutions to CIDs 5885, 5887, 5888, 5889, 5890” and delete lines 1311.48 through 1311.55 Discussion – concern on the technical change that limits the STA vs Type of PPDU transmission. Discuss the meaning of HT STA transmits PPDU vs STA transmits HT PPDU What is aPPDUMaxTime definition? See 2568.40; see 2547.42 – Concern on the breaking of a Single MAC – Single PHY, but we may be separating it based on PHY. Discussion on where the limit is applied and how to describe it in text. Two different ways to interpret the changes is causing a bit of in debating the solution. Question on how implementations actually implement this part? Not sure at this moment. Where is the aPPDUMaxTime get its value? Part of the disagreement is if The PHY-TXTIME.Confirm is per PPDU type. After the long debate – proposal to go with the proposed resolution and then see what the debate may be later. Mark Ready for Motion CID 5891 (MAC) Review comment and proposed changes. Disagreement on adding the “as defined in 21-31” Do we need a reference or a normative directive. Propose Resolution: Revised. Add to the end of the cited sentence “(see Table 21-31)”. Mark Ready for Motion CID 5893, 5136, 6449 – (MAC) Review comments Proposed Resolution 5136 and 6449: Accepted