2009 IEPR-Cycle Incremental Energy Efficiency Impacts As an element of the 2009 IEPR proceeding, the CEC staff developed incremental energy efficiency impacts based upon the specific strategies that the CPUC had assessed as part of its 2008 Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan and in setting its goals for the three IOUs. The strategies making up the scenarios involved various hypothetical energy efficiency programs, some extensions of existing efforts and some that were new. The focus of these programs was on residential and commercial building customer classes, not industrial or agricultural. The CEC published its final estimates, along with recommendations for use in CPUC proceedings, in May 2010. The CPUC in the 2010 LTPP proceeding chose a specific scenario, with adjustments, that IOUs were required to use in the developing future resource plans for the common scenarios. For this effort, the CEC used the adjusted values for years 2013-2020 that were included by the CPUC in the Administrative Law Judge Ruling attachments of February 2011. These are savings, described in both annual energy and peak load reductions, for each IOU service area for each of the residential, commercial and industrial customer classes. For summer peak demand power flow modeling purposes, especially as the basis for 1-in-10 LCA requirements assessments, peak demand load reductions are the focus of interest. Annual energy savings are not utilized. Table 1 provides the 2020 values used for year 2021 as the IOU service area starting point for allocation to load busses. 2021 is the year of interest for California ISO power flow modeling, but 2020 was the final year of the assessment prepared by the CEC and adjusted by the CPUC, so values in year 2021 were assumed to be identical to values in year 2020.
2009 IEPR-Cycle Incremental Energy Efficiency Impacts As an element of the 2009 IEPR proceeding, the CEC staff developed incremental energy efficiency impacts based upon the specific strategies that the CPUC had assessed as part of its 2008 Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan and in setting its goals for the three IOUs. The strategies making up the scenarios involved various hypothetical energy efficiency programs, some extensions of existing efforts and some that were new. The focus of these programs was on residential and commercial building customer classes, not industrial or agricultural. The CEC published its final estimates, along with recommendations for use in CPUC proceedings, in May 2010. The CPUC in the 2010 LTPP proceeding chose a specific scenario, with adjustments, that IOUs were required to use in the developing future resource plans for the common scenarios. For this effort, the CEC used the adjusted values for years 2013-2020 that were included by the CPUC in the Administrative Law Judge Ruling attachments of February 2011. These are savings, described in both annual energy and peak load reductions, for each IOU service area for each of the residential, commercial and industrial customer classes. For summer peak demand power flow modeling purposes, especially as the basis for 1-in-10 LCA requirements assessments, peak demand load reductions are the focus of interest. Annual energy savings are not utilized. Table 1 provides the 2020 values used for year 2021 as the IOU service area starting point for allocation to load busses. 2021 is the year of interest for California ISO power flow modeling, but 2020 was the final year of the assessment prepared by the CEC and adjusted by the CPUC, so values in year 2021 were assumed to be identical to values in year 2020.