Governors hold Leaders to The SIB is judged to be SIB continues to hold Plans developed to account for the progress of holding leadership to leadership to account. the governing body. all pupils, in particular for account. (postponed 4th Summer 2017 outcomes the disadvantaged, SEND Insufficient narrowing of the monitoring visit has Disadvantaged pupils make show narrowing of the gap and for attainment in gap between disadvantaged happened) expected progress. between disadvantaged and English and maths and non- disadvantaged. non-disadvantaged. English and maths Attainment in English and departments have strategies English and maths outcomes maths below prediction. in place to improve progress. move significantly closer to SEND progress requires national average. SEND pupils have Education improvement Plans to address learning SEND pupils make expected needs. progress. Safeguarding policies and Safeguarding is effective. Safeguarding Review (Sep Ongoing training including Review of year procedures are effective. 2016) recommendations de-escalation training for all addressed. staff and Level 3 for SLT. Link to Sef area Expected Outcome 1: The quality of provision is improved through self-evaluation, rigorous analysis, appraisal, recruitment and retention and CPD. number What will success look like? Lead How will we get there? (actions) How will we know we Cost, training and have arrived? (impact) resources L and M The SEF accurately records the academy’s PME Termly review, presented to the SIB. Accurate up-to-date SEF Time strengths and areas for development. available for external 1 and 3 ELT and SLT Printing scrutiny. SEF informs Action planning to support school improvement. L and M The Action Plan is effective in addressing PME Termly review, presented to the SIB. Actions about Time areas requiring improvement. improvements required 1 and 3 ELT and SLT Continual adjustments made as Meeting time to bring the academy strategies develop out of special measures Printing
Governors hold Leaders to account for the progress of all pupils, in particular for the disadvantaged, SEND and for attainment in English and maths The SIB is judged to be holding leadership to account. Insufficient narrowing of the gap between disadvantaged and non- disadvantaged. Attainment in English and maths below prediction. SEND progress requires improvement SIB continues to hold leadership to account. Disadvantaged pupils make expected progress. English and maths departments have strategies in place to improve progress. SEND pupils have Education Plans to address learning needs. Plans developed to the governing body. (postponed 4th monitoring visit has happened) Summer 2017 outcomes show narrowing of the gap between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged. English and maths outcomes move significantly closer to national average. SEND pupils make expected progress. Safeguarding policies and procedures are effective. Safeguarding is effective. Safeguarding Review (Sep 2016) recommendations addressed. Ongoing training including de-escalation training for all staff and Level 3 for SLT. Review of year Link to Sef area number Expected Outcome 1: The quality of provision is improved through self-evaluation, rigorous analysis, appraisal, recruitment and retention and CPD. What will success look like? Lead How will we get there? (actions) How will we know we have arrived? (impact) Cost, training and resources L and M 1 and 3 The SEF accurately records the academy’s strengths and areas for development. PME ELT and SLT Termly review, presented to the SIB. Accurate up-to-date SEF available for external scrutiny. SEF informs Action planning to support school improvement. Time Printing L and M 1 and 3 The Action Plan is effective in addressing areas requiring improvement. PME ELT and SLT Termly review, presented to the SIB. Continual adjustments made as strategies develop Actions about improvements required to bring the academy out of special measures Time Meeting time Printing