Physical Design Framework (check one, and demonstrate consistency): The proposed project is consistent with applicable planning and design guidelines, and campus review processes, in the Physical Design Framework (PhDF) accepted by the Regents in [date]. [Demonstrate consistency with the PhDF by briefly listing its relevant requirements and state how the project conforms to them. Attach design graphics used in design review and relied on by the Chancellor for design approval.] Consistency with the Physical Design Framework is not relevant to this submittal because the current Proposed Approvals do not include design approval. Long Range Development Plan (check one, and demonstrate consistency): The proposed project is consistent with the applicable land use designation of designation] in the [title/date] Long Range Development Plan approved by the Regents in [date]. The proposed project is not consistent with the applicable land use designation in the [title/date] Long Range Development Plan (LRDP). [Projects that require an LRDP amendment are not eligible to be processed as a Delegated-Authority project.] CONSISTENCY WITH CEQA AND UNIVERSITY/REGENTAL POLICIES California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The proposed action is subject to the CEQA. Attachment 1, CEQA Compliance Submittal Documentation is completed. The proposed action is not subject to the CEQA. [Briefly explain why action is not subject to CEQA. budget actions are not subject to CEQA.] Business Case Analysis: Chancellor or Sole Designated Official approved: [Enter date.] Not applicable because the project budget is under $10 million and/or is an infrastructure project. Independent Design and Cost Review of Building Plans: Complies. Date of Design Review: date.] Not applicable—budget action only. [Briefly demonstrate consistency.] Sustainable Practices: LEED™ applies. Target LEED™ [Enter Level.] Not applicable. Waiver requested: [Enter date.] Independent Seismic Review of Capital Projects: Complies. [Enter an affirmative statement that the project will have an independent seismic review or briefly demonstrate consistency.] Not applicable—no structural work. Value Engineering: Complies. SD review date: [Enter date.] Not applicable—budget action only University Controlled Insurance Program (UCIP): This project is subject to and will comply with the UCIP program. Not applicable. Estimated construction budget is: [Enter budget.] Do other policies apply? Yes—explained in an attachment to this Checklist No.
Physical Design Framework (check one, and demonstrate consistency): The proposed project is consistent with applicable planning and design guidelines, and campus review processes, in the Physical Design Framework (PhDF) accepted by the Regents in [date]. [Demonstrate consistency with the PhDF by briefly listing its relevant requirements and state how the project conforms to them. Attach design graphics used in design review and relied on by the Chancellor for design approval.] Consistency with the Physical Design Framework is not relevant to this submittal because the current Proposed Approvals do not include design approval. Long Range Development Plan (check one, and demonstrate consistency): The proposed project is consistent with the applicable land use designation of designation] in the [title/date] Long Range Development Plan approved by the Regents in [date]. The proposed project is not consistent with the applicable land use designation in the [title/date] Long Range Development Plan (LRDP). [Projects that require an LRDP amendment are not eligible to be processed as a Delegated-Authority project.] CONSISTENCY WITH CEQA AND UNIVERSITY/REGENTAL POLICIES California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The proposed action is subject to the CEQA. Attachment 1, CEQA Compliance Submittal Documentation is completed. The proposed action is not subject to the CEQA. [Briefly explain why action is not subject to CEQA. budget actions are not subject to CEQA.] Business Case Analysis: Chancellor or Sole Designated Official approved: [Enter date.] Not applicable because the project budget is under $10 million and/or is an infrastructure project. Independent Design and Cost Review of Building Plans: Complies. Date of Design Review: date.] Not applicable—budget action only. [Briefly demonstrate consistency.] Sustainable Practices: LEED™ applies. Target LEED™ [Enter Level.] Not applicable. Waiver requested: [Enter date.] Independent Seismic Review of Capital Projects: Complies. [Enter an affirmative statement that the project will have an independent seismic review or briefly demonstrate consistency.] Not applicable—no structural work. Value Engineering: Complies. SD review date: [Enter date.] Not applicable—budget action only University Controlled Insurance Program (UCIP): This project is subject to and will comply with the UCIP program. Not applicable. Estimated construction budget is: [Enter budget.] Do other policies apply? Yes—explained in an attachment to this Checklist No.