In 10.22.2.4 Obtaining an EDCA TXOP At P1487.50 insert each of the above-described specific slot boundaries, if there is no frame available for transmission at that “At EDCAF, each EDCAF shall: set the backoff timer for that EDCAF to a value of 0 wait for a timeout interval of duration aSIFSTime + aSlotTime + aRxPHYStartDelay” CID Commenter Clause Line Comment Proposed 364 Woojin Ahn 10.22.2.2 1486.8 When an AP updates EDCA - Otherwise, parameter set, associated - If CW[AC] is less than STAs only update their MIB CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set attributes and their current to the value max(CWmin[AC], CW[AC] will remain the (CW[AC] + 2 - 1). ├ù same. Therefore, when a - If CW[AC] is equal to or greater STA enters the "otherwise" than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall condition, it might have be set to CWmax[AC]. CW[AC] less than CWmin[AC] or greater than CWmax[AC] if its EDCA parameter set had been updated by the associated AP. It is necessary to keep STAs' CW values within the intended range [CWmin, CWmax]. Discussion: Text in question is 1486.8 — Otherwise, If CW[AC] is less than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to the value (CW[AC] + 1) × 2 1. — – If CW[AC] is equal to CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be left unchanged. — Proposal is to change the second bullet to account for CW[AC] > CWmax[AC] Proposed resolution: ACCEPT 1486.8 to read Otherwise, — If CW[AC] is less than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to the value (CW[AC] + 1) × 2 1. — – If CW[AC] is equal or gtreater than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to CWmax[AC]. —
In 10.22.2.4 Obtaining an EDCA TXOP At P1487.50 insert “At each of the above-described specific slot boundaries, if there is no frame available for transmission at that EDCAF, each EDCAF shall: set the backoff timer for that EDCAF to a value of 0 wait for a timeout interval of duration aSIFSTime + aSlotTime + aRxPHYStartDelay” CID Commenter Clause Line Comment Proposed 364 Woojin Ahn 10.22.2.2 1486.8 When an AP updates EDCA parameter set, associated STAs only update their MIB attributes and their current CW[AC] will remain the same. Therefore, when a STA enters the "otherwise" condition, it might have CW[AC] less than CWmin[AC] or greater than CWmax[AC] if its EDCA parameter set had been updated by the associated AP. It is necessary to keep STAs' CW values within the intended range [CWmin, CWmax]. - Otherwise, - If CW[AC] is less than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to the value max(CWmin[AC], (CW[AC] + ├ù 2 - 1). - If CW[AC] is equal to or greater than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to CWmax[AC]. Discussion: Text in question is 1486.8 — Otherwise, — If CW[AC] is less than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to the value (CW[AC] + 1) × 2 – 1. — If CW[AC] is equal to CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be left unchanged. Proposal is to change the second bullet to account for CW[AC] > CWmax[AC] Proposed resolution: ACCEPT 1486.8 to read — Otherwise, — If CW[AC] is less than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to the value (CW[AC] + 1) × 2 – 1. — If CW[AC] is equal or gtreater than CWmax[AC], CW[AC] shall be set to CWmax[AC].