ANNEXES Annex 1: Risk Analysis. Impact (I) 6 highest, 1 lowest, Probability (P) 6 highest, 1 lowest – – # Description Date Identified Type Impact & Countermeasures Owner Submitted, Last Status Probability / Mngt response updated by Update 1 Inconsistent 2013 Financial The risk would UNDP has funds Project UNCDF/UNDP/ no availability of Support to Strategic bring the whole and will mobilise Manager GOL change funds. UNDP financial project to a halt. with other may not be Inclusion in P = 3 partners able to Lesotho I = 6 mobilise (2010 2013) – additional resources required for the project t 2 Inadequate 2011 2011 The risk would Awareness on GOL UNCDF/UNDP/ No ownership, impede the partner strengths change GOL capacity and required direction and direct Support to involvement on and monitoring. engagement of financial the part of P = 5 prospective inclusion in participating I = 4 partners by the Lesotho partners project team 3 Weaknesses of 2013 Operational Ensure that Project UNDP/ GOL reducing coordination Organizational programme staff manager The risk would and limited have the right level Economic impede the engagement of subject, Empowerment required between operational and Project cooperation implementing strategic between partners competence implementing partners.
ANNEXES Annex 1: Risk Analysis. Impact (I) – 6 highest, 1 lowest, Probability (P) – 6 highest, 1 lowest # Description Date Identified Type Impact & Probability Countermeasures / Mngt response Owner Submitted, updated by Last Update Status 1 Inconsistent availability of funds. UNDP may not be able to mobilise additional resources required for the project t 2013 Support to financial Inclusion in Lesotho (2010 – 2013) Financial Strategic The risk would bring the whole project to a halt. P = 3 I = 6 UNDP has funds and will mobilise with other partners Project Manager UNCDF/UNDP/ GOL no change 2 Inadequate ownership, capacity and involvement on the part of participating partners 2011 Support to financial inclusion in Lesotho 2011 The risk would impede the required direction and monitoring. P = 5 I = 4 Awareness on partner strengths and direct engagement of prospective partners by the project team GOL UNCDF/UNDP/ GOL No change 3 Weaknesses of coordination and limited engagement between implementing partners 2013 Economic Empowerment Project Operational Organizational The risk would impede the required cooperation between implementing partners. Ensure that programme staff have the right level of subject, operational and strategic competence Project manager UNDP/ GOL reducing