performance criteria, performance criteria, target, or average score assessment method is a demographics, etc.). demographics, etc.). is 3.5). rubric, however AND graduation rates or test Results are represented scores are provided as visually with a premium results). on clarity, simplicity, and ease of use by the external reviewer (e.g., tables and/or graphs). Exemplary (3) Accomplished (2) Emerging (1) Beginning (0) Interpretation and/or Interpretation of results Interpretation of results Interpretation of results No interpretation draw connections between Evaluation draw connections between is ambiguous or attempted. the methodologies and the methodologies and superficial, or does not OR results, and seem to be results, and seem to be refer back to the The analysis of results reasonable inferences given reasonable inferences outcomes, benchmarks, repeats what is stated in the outcome(s). given the outcome(s). methodologies, or the Results category of AND AND results. (e.g., We met the report. A narrative is provided that A narrative is provided our benchmarks, or the (e.g., 14 students outlines the discussion of that outlines the students were received distinguished results by pertinent parties discussion of results by successful) ratings, or the average involved in data analysis. pertinent parties involved score was 3.5) AND in data analysis. The report identifies the AND person(s) involved in the The report identifies the interpretation of data person(s) involved in the (Names are not required), interpretation of data and the results were shared (Names are not required), with the program and the results were stakeholders (e.g., faculty, shared with the program curriculum committee.
performance criteria, demographics, etc.). AND Results are represented visually with a premium on clarity, simplicity, and ease of use by the external reviewer (e.g., tables and/or graphs). performance criteria, demographics, etc.). target, or average score is 3.5). assessment method is a rubric, however graduation rates or test scores are provided as results). Exemplary (3) Accomplished (2) Emerging (1) Beginning (0) Interpretation and/or Evaluation Interpretation of results draw connections between the methodologies and results, and seem to be reasonable inferences given the outcome(s). AND A narrative is provided that outlines the discussion of results by pertinent parties involved in data analysis. AND The report identifies the person(s) involved in the interpretation of data (Names are not required), and the results were shared with the program stakeholders (e.g., faculty, curriculum committee. Interpretation of results draw connections between the methodologies and results, and seem to be reasonable inferences given the outcome(s). AND A narrative is provided that outlines the discussion of results by pertinent parties involved in data analysis. AND The report identifies the person(s) involved in the interpretation of data (Names are not required), and the results were shared with the program Interpretation of results is ambiguous or superficial, or does not refer back to the outcomes, benchmarks, methodologies, or results. (e.g., We met our benchmarks, or the students were successful) No interpretation attempted. OR The analysis of results repeats what is stated in the Results category of the report. (e.g., 14 students received distinguished ratings, or the average score was 3.5)