Backwell and based on the lack of interest in developing the Moor Lane site is considered to provide a more realistic prospect of enabling employment provision For plan-making purposes, it is important to ensure The 114 hectares were remaining employment the allocations set out in the Site Allocations Plan allocations as set out in the Replacement Local will deliver the Core Strategy (CS) requirements and Plan and not specifically linked to the delivery of assess how this will be achieved. is no 10,100 jobs. The Core Strategy set out a assessment of whether these sites will, if delivered, requirement to review the remaining allocations meet the CS20 requirement. CS20 seeks to provide to ascertain whether or not they should be rolled 114 hectares for B1, B2 and B8 uses, whereas forward. In addition much of the allocation at schedule 2 identifies 86.21 hectares. Unlike for WSM such as at RAF Locking was no longer fit residential development completions are not for purpose taking into account the Weston identified, so it is impossible to assess whether the Villages proposals. overall quantum of employment land identified in CS20 will be delivered by the additional 86.21 It is recognised that many of the 10,100 jobs will hectares identified in schedule 2. not be B Class and won’t have a land requirement. Therefore only a proportion of the 10,100 jobs will translate to a land requirement and it is considered that there is sufficient land set aside to facilitate the delivery of jobs as proposed. Recent work on the Joint Spatial Plan carried out a review of forecast employment against land supply and identified that from a numeric point of
Backwell and based on the lack of interest in developing the Moor Lane site is considered to provide a more realistic prospect of enabling employment provision For plan-making purposes, it is important to ensure the allocations set out in the Site Allocations Plan will deliver the Core Strategy (CS) requirements and assess how this will be achieved. is no assessment of whether these sites will, if delivered, meet the CS20 requirement. CS20 seeks to provide 114 hectares for B1, B2 and B8 uses, whereas schedule 2 identifies 86.21 hectares. Unlike for residential development completions are not identified, so it is impossible to assess whether the overall quantum of employment land identified in CS20 will be delivered by the additional 86.21 hectares identified in schedule 2. The 114 hectares were remaining employment allocations as set out in the Replacement Local Plan and not specifically linked to the delivery of 10,100 jobs. The Core Strategy set out a requirement to review the remaining allocations to ascertain whether or not they should be rolled forward. In addition much of the allocation at WSM such as at RAF Locking was no longer fit for purpose taking into account the Weston Villages proposals. It is recognised that many of the 10,100 jobs will not be B Class and won’t have a land requirement. Therefore only a proportion of the 10,100 jobs will translate to a land requirement and it is considered that there is sufficient land set aside to facilitate the delivery of jobs as proposed. Recent work on the Joint Spatial Plan carried out a review of forecast employment against land supply and identified that from a numeric point of