DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION AMBIENT MONITORING REPORT Date: 1. Study highlights Study Number: Title: County: Study Waterbody/ area: Watershed: Land Use Type: Ag Urban Forested Mixed Other Storm drain outfall Creek River Pond Lake Water body type: Drainage ditch Other: Objectives: Sampling period: Pesticides monitored: or copy) Major findings: (enter or copy) Recommendations for pesticides that need a CDFA analytical method (from SWMP): 2. Pesticide detection frequency Table 1. Pesticides detected in water. Complete data set in Appendix. Lowest Number of Number Reporting Detection Number of USEPA BM BM exceedance Pesticide of Limit frequency detections benchmark frequency (%) samples (µg/L) (%) (BM) (µg/L)*
DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION AMBIENT MONITORING REPORT Date: 1. Study highlights Study Number: Title: Study area: County: Waterbody/ Watershed: Land Use Type: Ag Urban Forested Mixed Other Water body type: Storm drain outfall Creek River Pond Lake Drainage ditch Other: Objectives: Sampling period: Pesticides monitored: or copy) Major findings: (enter or copy) Recommendations for pesticides that need a CDFA analytical method (from SWMP): 2. Pesticide detection frequency Table 1. Pesticides detected in water. Complete data set in Appendix. Pesticide Number of samples Number of detections Reporting Limit (µg/L) Detection frequency (%) Lowest USEPA benchmark (BM) (µg/L)* Number of BM BM exceedance frequency (%)