BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT ) APPLICATION OF UNITED WATER IDAHO ) CASE NO. UWI-W-99-2 INC. AND BARBER WATER CORPORATION ) FOR AN ORDER APPROVING THE ) PURCHASE BY UNITED WATER IDAHO ) INC. OF WATER SERVICE PROPERTIES ) OWNED BY BARBER WATER ) CORPORATION; FOR AUTHORITY TO ) EXPAND UNITED WATER ) IDAHO’S CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE ) AND NECESSITY NO. 143 AND FOR ) ORDER NO. 28062 APPROVAL OF RATES AND CHARGES. ) ) On May 14, 1999, the Commission in Case No. UWI-W-99-2 denied a Petition for in Public Affairs Inc. In its interlocutory Order Intervention filed by CAPA: Citizens’ Advocates No. 28048 the Commission made the following findings: The Commission finds that CAPA has not articulated any direct and substantial interest in this case, nor has it raised any issues that cannot otherwise be adequately addressed in written comments or in public testimony. The Commission finds on the basis of the filings of record that intervention in these proceedings by CAPA will not serve the purposes of intervention as described by Rules 71-74 of the Rules of Commission’s Procedure. Also noted in the was that a hybrid procedure has been adopted in this case, Commission’s Order written comments in lieu of a formal technical hearing and an evening hearing for public testimony. On May 18, 1999, a timely Petition for Review of Commission Order No. 28048 was filed by CAPA. Based on further information provided by CAPA, the nature of which it contends articulates a direct and substantial interest in the case, CAPA requests that the Commission rescind its prior Order No. 28048 and grant CAPA full rights of participation as an intervening party. Reference Rules 71-75 Commission Rules of Procedure; IDAPA 31.01.01.071-075. Should the Commission choose not to rescind Order No. 28048, CAPA requests that the Commission require the Company to answer questions propounded in its filing prior to the June 23, 1999, evening hearing scheduled for public testimony.
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF UNITED WATER IDAHO INC. AND BARBER WATER CORPORATION FOR AN ORDER APPROVING THE PURCHASE BY UNITED WATER IDAHO INC. OF WATER SERVICE PROPERTIES OWNED BY BARBER WATER CORPORATION; FOR AUTHORITY TO EXPAND UNITED WATER IDAHO’S CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY NO. 143 AND FOR APPROVAL OF RATES AND CHARGES. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. UWI-W-99-2 ORDER NO. 28062 On May 14, 1999, the Commission in Case No. UWI-W-99-2 denied a Petition for Intervention filed by CAPA: Citizens’ Advocates in Public Affairs Inc. In its interlocutory Order No. 28048 the Commission made the following findings: The Commission finds that CAPA has not articulated any direct and substantial interest in this case, nor has it raised any issues that cannot otherwise be adequately addressed in written comments or in public testimony. The Commission finds on the basis of the filings of record that intervention in these proceedings by CAPA will not serve the purposes of intervention as described by Rules 71-74 of the Commission’s Rules of Procedure. Also noted in the Commission’s Order was that a hybrid procedure has been adopted in this case, written comments in lieu of a formal technical hearing and an evening hearing for public testimony. On May 18, 1999, a timely Petition for Review of Commission Order No. 28048 was filed by CAPA. Based on further information provided by CAPA, the nature of which it contends articulates a direct and substantial interest in the case, CAPA requests that the Commission rescind its prior Order No. 28048 and grant CAPA full rights of participation as an intervening party. Reference Rules 71-75 Commission Rules of Procedure; IDAPA 31.01.01.071-075. Should the Commission choose not to rescind Order No. 28048, CAPA requests that the Commission require the Company to answer questions propounded in its filing prior to the June 23, 1999, evening hearing scheduled for public testimony.