WY-FI Key Performance Indicators WY-FI Hub No Measured Activity Evidence Measured Activity Link to outcomes in Table 1 1 50 services and agencies adopt the WY-FI Services and agencies 8 agencies in pilot Locality - year 3 Outcome 2 sign up to the WY-FI 30 agencies with rollout in 2 Localities year 4 ‘passport’ – Information Sharing Protocol and adopt Feasibility paper presented to and accepted by CPMB the Apr 17. Actions outstanding due to extended process in ‘passport’ recruitment of Co-Production Champions 2 Personalisation Fund applications Personalisation fund 6 monthly reporting of the impact of the applications Personalisation Fund applications spreadsheet/ Processed in a timely manner Evaluation reports 3 Co-produced research, evaluation, review Business Review Business review event/revised planning/learning Outcome 3 and and re-modelling of delivery and project 4 Research and Peer research undertaken plans completed Evaluation Team Annual insight research completed (Service User/ Reports and position Expert involvement in evaluation of services and papers service user experience) Local Evaluation 80 - year 4 Partner Reports CRESR submit annual evaluation report on the overall assessment of the project SROI case studies 4 Experts by experience support and influence Quarterly review of Engagement and Co-Production Workers and the programme Navigator Teams to ensure: Expert Involvement At least 2 service users attend each Locality Group and Influence Plan meeting A minimum of 8 meetings per year
WY-FI Key Performance Indicators WY-FI Hub No Measured Activity Evidence Measured Activity Link to outcomes in Table 1 1 50 services and agencies adopt the WY-FI ‘passport’ Services and agencies sign up to the WY-FI Information Sharing Protocol and adopt the ‘passport’ 8 agencies in pilot Locality - year 3 30 agencies with rollout in 2 Localities – year 4 Feasibility paper presented to and accepted by CPMB Apr 17. Actions outstanding due to extended process in recruitment of Co-Production Champions Outcome 2 2 Personalisation Fund applications Personalisation fund applications spreadsheet/ Evaluation reports 6 monthly reporting of the impact of the Personalisation Fund applications Processed in a timely manner 3 Co-produced research, evaluation, review and re-modelling of delivery and project plans completed Business Review Research and Evaluation Team Reports and position papers Local Evaluation Partner Reports SROI case studies Business review event/revised planning/learning Peer research undertaken Annual insight research completed (Service User/ Expert involvement in evaluation of services and service user experience) 80 - year 4 CRESR submit annual evaluation report on the overall assessment of the project Outcome 3 and 4 4 Experts by experience support and influence the programme Quarterly review of Expert Involvement and Influence Plan Engagement and Co-Production Workers and Navigator Teams to ensure: At least 2 service users attend each Locality Group meeting A minimum of 8 meetings per year