(i.e., routine reporting is diagnose where the data reporting likely underestimating system is breaking down true coverage) Congratulate your teams. Continue using the current reporting system, Reported coverage and with increased confidence that it survey coverage are A good reporting system is in provides a good estimate of PC similare coverage. Less expenditure in future surveys (at least for the current survey area) is required. Comparison of survey coverage with programme reach: To assess compliance and the success of the programs social mobilization and communication strategy Check the reasons given for why Improved information and education Survey coverage is less individuals who were offered the campaigns may be needed prior to the than programme reach drug did not swallow it next round to increase compliance Greater training may be needed to There may be a problem with the make sure the survey team correctly coverage survey data. Check to Survey coverage is understands the difference between see if the survey team greater than programme offered the drug(s) and implemented the questionnaire reach swallowing the drugs and that this correctly; recount results and difference is conveyed correctly to the check for arithmetic errors respondents Congratulate the teams. Continue with Survey coverage is close the current information and education to or equal to Compliance is high campaigns, as they appear to be programme reach working aApplies to situations in which either the survey coverage is below the target coverage threshold or the 1-sided lower 95% confidence bound of the survey coverage is below the threshold. bApplies when the survey coverage, and the 1-sided lower 95% confidence bound of the survey coverage, both exceed the target coverage threshold. cA more objective approach is to see if reported coverage is greater than the 2-sided upper 95% confidence limit of the survey coverage. dA more objective approach is to see if reported coverage is less than the 2-sided lower 95% confidence limit of the survey coverage. eA more objective approach is to see if reported coverage is contained within the 95% confidence interval around the survey coverage. fThe DQA tool is available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JZS3.pdf
(i.e., routine reporting is likely underestimating true coverage) diagnose where the data reporting system is breaking down Reported coverage and survey coverage are similare A good reporting system is in Congratulate your teams. Continue using the current reporting system, with increased confidence that it provides a good estimate of PC coverage. Less expenditure in future surveys (at least for the current survey area) is required. Comparison of survey coverage with programme reach: To assess compliance and the success of the programs social mobilization and communication strategy Survey coverage is less than programme reach Check the reasons given for why individuals who were offered the drug did not swallow it Improved information and education campaigns may be needed prior to the next round to increase compliance Survey coverage is greater than programme reach There may be a problem with the coverage survey data. Check to see if the survey team implemented the questionnaire correctly; recount results and check for arithmetic errors Greater training may be needed to make sure the survey team correctly understands the difference between offered the drug(s) and swallowing the drugs and that this difference is conveyed correctly to the respondents Survey coverage is close to or equal to programme reach Compliance is high Congratulate the teams. Continue with the current information and education campaigns, as they appear to be working aApplies to situations in which either the survey coverage is below the target coverage threshold or the 1-sided lower 95% confidence bound of the survey coverage is below the threshold. bApplies when the survey coverage, and the 1-sided lower 95% confidence bound of the survey coverage, both exceed the target coverage threshold. cA more objective approach is to see if reported coverage is greater than the 2-sided upper 95% confidence limit of the survey coverage. dA more objective approach is to see if reported coverage is less than the 2-sided lower 95% confidence limit of the survey coverage. eA more objective approach is to see if reported coverage is contained within the 95% confidence interval around the survey coverage. fThe DQA tool is available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JZS3.pdf