Lighthorne Parish What mitigation is proposed exactly? There is insufficient The detail provided is considered appropriate for this Council detail to be able to comment meaningfully. document. Gaydon Parish Council We were pleased to see acknowledgement of flooding issues Comments noted. Consultee Comments Response Chesterton and Figure 16 "M40 BUND SECTION" is misleading and takes no Noted see earlier comments in relation to site – Kingston Parish Meeting account of the sloping topography mentioned earlier from topography. north west to south east across the north eastern part of the site. due to surface drainage within Gaydon and note the three SUDS ponds within the green triangle as mitigation measures against this. We consider this land is an essential mitigation measure for the village against noise, light, and air pollution emanating from the dual carriageway. 3.8 - Utilities 3.9 - Noise
Lighthorne Parish Council What mitigation is proposed exactly? There is insufficient detail to be able to comment meaningfully. The detail provided is considered appropriate for this document. Gaydon Parish Council We were pleased to see acknowledgement of flooding issues due to surface drainage within Gaydon and note the three SUDS ponds within the green triangle as mitigation measures against this. We consider this land is an essential mitigation measure for the village against noise, light, and air pollution emanating from the dual carriageway. Comments noted. 3.8 - Utilities Consultee Comments Response Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting Figure 16 "M40 BUND SECTION" is misleading and takes no account of the sloping topography mentioned earlier from north west to south east across the north eastern part of the site. Noted – see earlier comments in relation to site topography. 3.9 - Noise