IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Comment Resolution on MU Acknowledgement Procedure Date: 2016-09-12 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address email Junichi Iwatani +81-46-859-4222 iwatani.junichi@lab.ntt.co.jp 1-1 Hikarinooka, Yasuhiko Inoue NTT Yokosuka, Kanagawa inoue.yasuhiko@lab.ntt.co.jp 239-0847 Japan Shoko Shinohara shinohara.shoko@lab.ntt.co.jp CID 2313 CID Clause Page Line Comment Proposed Change Resolution Number 2313 10.3.2.11.1 42 02 No text for The subclause "10.3.2.11.1 Revised: 10.3.2.11.1 General ? General" may be removed if we "10.3.2.11.1 do not have any text for this General" is subclause. already removed in 0.3 by TGax editor. CID 1410, 1454, 1728, 1897, 1411, 1729, 1898, 1899 CID Clause Page Line Comment Proposed Change Resolution Number 1410 10.3.2.11.2 42 06 It says "for DL MU PPDU Delete "in SU format" in SU format". This seems self-contradictory 1454 10.3.2.11.2 42 06 Subclause title appears Please clarify text wrong. What is a 'DL MU PPDU in SU format'? 1728 10.3.2.11.2 42 06 I don't understand DL MU Clarify PPDU in SU format. How MU PPDU is mapped to SU format? 1897 10.3.2.11.2 42 06 "MU acknowledgement Replace "MU procedure for DL MU acknowledgement procedure PPDU" creates the for DL MU PPDU in SU impression that both the format" with "SU-format PPDU and the acknowledgement procedure acknowledgement are in for DL MU PPDU" MU. In fact, the acknowledgement is in SU. 1411 10.3.2.11.3 42 34 It says "for HE MU PPDU Delete "in MU format" in MU format". This seems pleonastic 1729 10.3.2.11.3 42 34 This clause seems to address replace HE MU PPDU by HE DL MU PPDU HE DL MU PPDU
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Comment Resolution on MU Acknowledgement Procedure Date: 2016-09-12 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address email Junichi Iwatani NTT 1-1 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 239-0847 Japan +81-46-859-4222 iwatani.junichi@lab.ntt.co.jp Yasuhiko Inoue inoue.yasuhiko@lab.ntt.co.jp Shoko Shinohara shinohara.shoko@lab.ntt.co.jp CID 2313 CID Clause Number Page Line Comment Proposed Change Resolution 2313 10.3.2.11.1 42 02 No text for 10.3.2.11.1 General ? The subclause "10.3.2.11.1 General" may be removed if we do not have any text for this subclause. Revised: "10.3.2.11.1 General" is already removed in 0.3 by TGax editor. CID 1410, 1454, 1728, 1897, 1411, 1729, 1898, 1899 CID Clause Number Page Line Comment Proposed Change Resolution 1410 10.3.2.11.2 42 06 It says "for DL MU PPDU in SU format". This seems self-contradictory Delete "in SU format" 1454 10.3.2.11.2 42 06 Subclause title appears wrong. What is a 'DL MU PPDU in SU format'? Please clarify text 1728 10.3.2.11.2 42 06 I don't understand DL MU PPDU in SU format. How MU PPDU is mapped to SU format? Clarify 1897 10.3.2.11.2 42 06 "MU acknowledgement procedure for DL MU PPDU" creates the impression that both the PPDU and the acknowledgement are in MU. In fact, the acknowledgement is in SU. Replace "MU acknowledgement procedure for DL MU PPDU in SU format" with "SU-format acknowledgement procedure for DL MU PPDU" 1411 10.3.2.11.3 42 34 It says "for HE MU PPDU in MU format". This seems pleonastic Delete "in MU format" 1729 10.3.2.11.3 42 34 This clause seems to address HE DL MU PPDU replace HE MU PPDU by HE DL MU PPDU