Fragment Number subfield ..." 7934 Mark RISON 38.04 "NOTE---When a Multi-STA BlockAck frame is Delete this NOTE Revised – used to acknowledge a management frame, the TID value is set to 15." -- according to e.g. in principle. Table 9-24b this is only the case for Action frames TGax editor shall incorporate changes in 8113 Matthew 38.35 There is no explicit language anywhere stating Clarify - even if Revised – Fischer what the allowed responses to UL OFDMA VHT the comment is Single are - I assume, without any explicit correct, at least Clarified that Ack language, that both ACK and MBA are allowed add a note Context (MBA with pointing this out Acktype=1 & TID to avoid the 0-7) is sent only in possibility that an DL in response to AP responds with an HE TB PPDU. ACK and a Responding with STA refuses Ack is legacy it. behavior, and is captured in 27.4 for HE cases. TGax editor shall incorporate changes in 8157 Ming Gan 38.04 Now Multi-STA BlockAck can not be used to define a common Rejected – acknowledge the association request frame special AID for all because of unassociated STA is not assigned the unassociated Un-associated an AID STAs such that STAs can have a they can the single AID. No M-BA frame need to have correctly individually unique AID. 8186 37.23 The language, "multi-STA multi-TID and I suggest using Revised – Aboulmagd single TID" is very awakward. Additionally something like, there is no BA variant having this name. "Multi-STA BA TGax editor shall varaint for single incorporate or multiple TID". I changes in am sure the Editor will come up with better wording :-)
Fragment Number subfield ..." 7934 Mark RISON 38.04 "NOTE---When a Multi-STA BlockAck frame is used to acknowledge a management frame, the TID value is set to 15." -- according to e.g. Table 9-24b this is only the case for Action frames Delete this NOTE Revised – in principle. TGax editor shall incorporate changes in 8113 Matthew Fischer 38.35 There is no explicit language anywhere stating what the allowed responses to UL OFDMA VHT Single are - I assume, without any explicit language, that both ACK and MBA are allowed Clarify - even if the comment is correct, at least add a note pointing this out to avoid the possibility that an AP responds with ACK and a STA refuses it. Revised – Clarified that Ack Context (MBA with Acktype=1 & TID 0-7) is sent only in DL in response to an HE TB PPDU. Responding with Ack is legacy behavior, and is captured in 27.4 for HE cases. TGax editor shall incorporate changes in 8157 Ming Gan 38.04 Now Multi-STA BlockAck can not be used to acknowledge the association request frame because of unassociated STA is not assigned an AID define a common special AID for all the unassociated STAs such that they can the M-BA frame correctly Rejected – Un-associated STAs can have a single AID. No need to have individually unique AID. 8186 Aboulmagd 37.23 The language, "multi-STA multi-TID and single TID" is very awakward. Additionally there is no BA variant having this name. I suggest using something like, "Multi-STA BA varaint for single or multiple TID". I am sure the Editor will come up with better wording :-) Revised – TGax editor shall incorporate changes in