27 PWC, (2010). Economic No ANZLIC the Spatial Information Council The report identifies – Assessment of Spatial Data (ANZLIC) commissioned the report after principles for guiding the Pricing and Access, recognising a potential benefit in having development of a pricing PricewaterhouseCoopers, a robust framework for managing access and access framework for 1 Report, ANZLIC, to, and pricing of, fundamental data to spatial data Canberra. Retrieved from support the development and sustainability of the spatial data industry. There was concern that proponents of the on-line’ model have not ‘free considered the full economic implications of this approach on the sustainability of the spatial data industry and set out to conduct a holistic analysis of the economic fundamentals surrounding the creation, management, maintenance and provision of access to spatial resources. 28 PWC, (2014). Deciding with No This report examines the value add of Argues that innovation data How data-driven open data, big data, personal data, and driven by this data innovation is fuelling internal enterprise data, provide to contributed $67 billion (or Australia’s economic business processes, particularly in 4.4%) to Australian GDP growth, driving innovation. Noting technological in 2013 PricewaterhouseCoopers advances such as sensors, consumer for Google Australia, devices, cloud computing, as well as the Australia. Retrieved from internet, are dramatically increasing the amount of available data. 29 SCGOE, (2014). Open data: No Consistent with Canada’s signing of the Provides comments by the way of the future, G8 Open Data Charter, the committee Michael Chui, Partner, Standing Committee on undertook a study to assess and enhance McKinsey Global Institute, Government Operations the government’s open data practices. and author of the and Estimates, Canada. This study include: McKinsey (2013) study on Retrieved from the applicability of their examining how Canadian businesses results to the Canadian can better obtain and utilise high-value context information with strong economic potential from the government; reviewing the processes and practices of other governments with respect to their collection, storage and transfer of open data; and the committee’s use of its findings to provide the government with direction and advice focused on improving the way high-value data is collected, stored and transferred to Canadians, resulting in access to useful and useable open data that will drive economic growth as part of an information economy.
27 PWC, (2010). Economic Assessment of Spatial Data Pricing and Access, PricewaterhouseCoopers, 1 Report, ANZLIC, Canberra. Retrieved from No ANZLIC – the Spatial Information Council (ANZLIC) commissioned the report after recognising a potential benefit in having a robust framework for managing access to, and pricing of, fundamental data to support the development and sustainability of the spatial data industry. There was concern that proponents of the ‘free on-line’ model have not considered the full economic implications of this approach on the sustainability of the spatial data industry and set out to conduct a holistic analysis of the economic fundamentals surrounding the creation, management, maintenance and provision of access to spatial resources. The report identifies principles for guiding the development of a pricing and access framework for spatial data 28 PWC, (2014). Deciding with data How data-driven innovation is fuelling Australia’s economic growth, PricewaterhouseCoopers for Google Australia, Australia. Retrieved from No This report examines the value add of open data, big data, personal data, and internal enterprise data, provide to business processes, particularly in driving innovation. Noting technological advances such as sensors, consumer devices, cloud computing, as well as the internet, are dramatically increasing the amount of available data. Argues that innovation driven by this data contributed $67 billion (or 4.4%) to Australian GDP in 2013 29 SCGOE, (2014). Open data: the way of the future, Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, Canada. Retrieved from No Consistent with Canada’s signing of the G8 Open Data Charter, the committee undertook a study to assess and enhance the government’s open data practices. This study include: examining how Canadian businesses can better obtain and utilise high-value information with strong economic potential from the government; reviewing the processes and practices of other governments with respect to their collection, storage and transfer of open data; and the committee’s use of its findings to provide the government with direction and advice focused on improving the way high-value data is collected, stored and transferred to Canadians, resulting in access to useful and useable open data that will drive economic growth as part of an information economy. Provides comments by Michael Chui, Partner, McKinsey Global Institute, and author of the McKinsey (2013) study on the applicability of their results to the Canadian context