2.2 Sustainment Performance Provide data for demonstrations and tests that include evaluation of sustainment elements, its source (e.g., Systems Engineering Plan [SEP], Service/Component, contract), the metric (from Table 2-1) or major feature that affects sustainment or sustainment cost (e.g., cost driver), its schedule, performance goal, estimated value at IOC, PSM impact assessment based on test results ). also should include any demonstration of metrics post-fielding associated with upgrades and/or program modifications and their associated reviews and performance goals. Demonstrated (tested) Sustainment Performance Test Metric/ Feature Schedule PSM Performance Estimated Assessment (SOW, Goal Value/IOC CDRL, DID, Estimate Service) 1st Qtr CY IOT&E Early User AR 73-1 Low observable Repair 1 sq ft Marginal; achieved Test/ coating on area in 4 tested value: 7 only 50% of 2012 /3rd Limited external surfaces hours hr / 5 hours performance at EUT; Qtr Y2015 projected at User Test Risk #A325 IOC Development 46 hrs 46 hrs TBD Reliability SEP CDRL Intelligence, Surveillance and Growth A02 Reconnaissance Test (RGT) (ISR) system reliability of 46 hrs MTBSA 1stQtr See Tables 2-1 Initial TEMP All metrics in See Tables 2-1 TBD CY17 and 2-2 Operational Table 2-1 and 2-2 and 2-2 Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) Table 2-2: Sustainment Performance Assessment/ Test Results Include as-of date AFLCMC Additional Guidance: For Table 2-2, clearly show how the demonstrated performance measures are mapped to the product support plan. Identify links between Section 10, Supportability Analysis, and demonstrated performance measures. In other words, what analysis was done to support that the program’s product support metrics can or have been achieved? Product Support Strategy The Military Services should begin product support planning as soon as the Milestone Decision Authority has determined that a Materiel Solution is needed to satisfy the capability requirement. This timing often precedes formal establishment of a program of record and staffing of a program office. Where sustainment is included (preponderance of
2.2 Sustainment Performance Provide data for demonstrations and tests that include evaluation of sustainment elements, its source (e.g., Systems Engineering Plan [SEP], Service/Component, contract), the metric (from Table 2-1) or major feature that affects sustainment or sustainment cost (e.g., cost driver), its schedule, performance goal, estimated value at IOC, PSM impact assessment based on test results ). also should include any demonstration of metrics post-fielding associated with upgrades and/or program modifications and their associated reviews and performance goals. Demonstrated (tested) Sustainment Performance Test (SOW, CDRL, DID, Service) Metric/ Feature Schedule Performance Goal Estimated Value/IOC Estimate PSM Assessment Early User Test/ Limited User Test AR 73-1 Low observable coating on external surfaces 1st Qtr CY 2012 /3rd Qtr Y2015 Repair 1 sq ft area in 4 hours IOT&E tested value: 7 hr / 5 hours projected at IOC Marginal; achieved only 50% of performance at EUT; Risk #A325 Reliability Growth Test (RGT) SEP CDRL A02 Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) system reliability of 46 hrs MTBSA Development 46 hrs 46 hrs TBD Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) TEMP All metrics in Table 2-1 and 2-2 1stQtr CY17 See Tables 2-1 and 2-2 See Tables 2-1 and 2-2 TBD Table 2-2: Sustainment Performance Assessment/ Test Results Include as-of date AFLCMC Additional Guidance: For Table 2-2, clearly show how the demonstrated performance measures are mapped to the product support plan. Identify links between Section 10, Supportability Analysis, and demonstrated performance measures. In other words, what analysis was done to support that the program’s product support metrics can or have been achieved? Product Support Strategy The Military Services should begin product support planning as soon as the Milestone Decision Authority has determined that a Materiel Solution is needed to satisfy the capability requirement. This timing often precedes formal establishment of a program of record and staffing of a program office. Where sustainment is included (preponderance of