Evaluation of Cost: Pricing The vendor must provide pricing as required on the Pricing Page. – Objective Evaluation of Cost The cost evaluation shall be based on a total cost determined using the – quantities provided below and prices stated on the Pricing Page for the original and each potential renewal period. 400 Initial Polygraph - Sexual History 50 Initial Polygraph - Instant Offense Examinations Examinations 180 Maintenance Examinations 180 Sex Offense Monitoring Examinations 1 Incomplete Polygraph Examination 1 No Show Cost evaluation points shall be determined from the result of the calculation stated above using the following formula: Maximum Cost Lowest Responsive Price Vendor’s Assigned Cost X Evaluation = Points Compared Price Vendor’s points (90) The vendor shall agree and understand that the quantities used in the evaluation of cost are provided solely to document how cost will be evaluated. The State of Missouri makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy of the quantities stated nor does the State of Missouri intend to imply that the figures used for the cost evaluation in any way reflect either actual or anticipated usage. Evaluation of Experience and Reliability and Expertise of Personnel: Vendor’s Experience and reliability of the organization will be considered subjectively in the evaluation vendor’s process. Therefore, the vendor is advised to submit information concerning the organization and vendor’s information documenting the experience in past performances, especially those performances vendor’s related to the requirements of this RFP. If the vendor is proposing an entity other than the vendor to perform the required services, the vendor should also submit the information requested for such proposed subcontractor. Vendor Information - The vendor should provide information about the organization on vendor’s Exhibit A. Experience - The vendor should provide information related to previous and current services/contracts of the vendor or proposed subcontractor where performance was similar vendor’s to the required services of this RFP. The information may be shown on Exhibit B or in a similar manner. As part of the evaluation process, the State of Missouri may contact the references, vendor’s including references not listed or identified within the proposal but who have current vendor’s or previous experiences with the vendor. The vendor shall agree and understand that the State of Missouri is not obligated to contact the references. vendor’s The qualifications of the personnel proposed by the vendor to perform the requirements of this RFP, whether from the organization or from a proposed subcontractor, will be subjectively evaluated. vendor’s Therefore, the vendor should submit detailed information related to the experience and qualifications, including education and training, of proposed personnel.
Evaluation of Cost: Pricing – The vendor must provide pricing as required on the Pricing Page. Objective Evaluation of Cost – The cost evaluation shall be based on a total cost determined using the quantities provided below and prices stated on the Pricing Page for the original and each potential renewal period. 400 Initial Polygraph - Sexual History Examinations 50 Initial Polygraph - Instant Offense Examinations 180 Maintenance Examinations 180 Sex Offense Monitoring Examinations 1 Incomplete Polygraph Examination 1 No Show Cost evaluation points shall be determined from the result of the calculation stated above using the following formula: Lowest Responsive Vendor’s Price X Maximum Cost Evaluation points (90) = Assigned Cost Points Compared Vendor’s Price The vendor shall agree and understand that the quantities used in the evaluation of cost are provided solely to document how cost will be evaluated. The State of Missouri makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy of the quantities stated nor does the State of Missouri intend to imply that the figures used for the cost evaluation in any way reflect either actual or anticipated usage. Evaluation of Vendor’s Experience and Reliability and Expertise of Personnel: Experience and reliability of the vendor’s organization will be considered subjectively in the evaluation process. Therefore, the vendor is advised to submit information concerning the vendor’s organization and information documenting the vendor’s experience in past performances, especially those performances related to the requirements of this RFP. If the vendor is proposing an entity other than the vendor to perform the required services, the vendor should also submit the information requested for such proposed subcontractor. Vendor Information - The vendor should provide information about the vendor’s organization on Exhibit A. Experience - The vendor should provide information related to previous and current services/contracts of the vendor or vendor’s proposed subcontractor where performance was similar to the required services of this RFP. The information may be shown on Exhibit B or in a similar manner. As part of the evaluation process, the State of Missouri may contact the vendor’s references, including references not listed or identified within the vendor’s proposal but who have current or previous experiences with the vendor. The vendor shall agree and understand that the State of Missouri is not obligated to contact the vendor’s references. The qualifications of the personnel proposed by the vendor to perform the requirements of this RFP, whether from the vendor’s organization or from a proposed subcontractor, will be subjectively evaluated. Therefore, the vendor should submit detailed information related to the experience and qualifications, including education and training, of proposed personnel.