NOTICE Notice of Advice Letters 5119-E, et al. was made by publication in the Commission’s Daily Calendar. PG&E states that a copy of the Advice Letter was mailed and distributed in accordance with Section 4 of General Order 96-B. AL 5119-E, et al. was timely protested by the Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and Direct Access Customer Coalition (together and “AReM/DACC”), Clean Energy, City of Lancaster, Sonoma Clean Power, and Silicon Valley Clean Energy (collectively Parties”) on August 21, 2017. “CCA The Joint IOUs timely filed a reply to protests on August 28, 2017. Both AReM/DACC and the CCA Parties urge the Commission to reject AL 5119-E, et al., and on similar grounds. We summarize each issue raised in protests, with the response of the IOUs, as categorized below. Table 4 In its protest AReM/DACC point to the inconsistencies between data sources used by the IOUs to update Table 4. All three IOUs utilized the Direct Access Implementation Activities Reports, which are posted on the CPUC’s website, by month. In updating Table 4, SCE utilized the report from July 15, 2017, whereas PG&E and SDG&E utilized the report from June 15, 2017. AReM/DACC also provide corrections to Table 4 one to correct SCE’s applicable ESP load, and the – second to correct the DA MW share of non-bypassable charges for SDG&E. The corrected table provided in AReM/DACC’s protest is pasted, below. In their joint reply to protests, both SDG&E and SCE agree with the revisions proposed by AReM/DACC, and agree to update the table accordingly. Table 5
NOTICE Notice of Advice Letters 5119-E, et al. was made by publication in the Commission’s Daily Calendar. PG&E states that a copy of the Advice Letter was mailed and distributed in accordance with Section 4 of General Order 96-B. AL 5119-E, et al. was timely protested by the Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and Direct Access Customer Coalition (together “AReM/DACC”), and Clean Energy, City of Lancaster, Sonoma Clean Power, and Silicon Valley Clean Energy (collectively “CCA Parties”) on August 21, 2017. The Joint IOUs timely filed a reply to protests on August 28, 2017. Both AReM/DACC and the CCA Parties urge the Commission to reject AL 5119-E, et al., and on similar grounds. We summarize each issue raised in protests, with the response of the IOUs, as categorized below. Table 4 In its protest AReM/DACC point to the inconsistencies between data sources used by the IOUs to update Table 4. All three IOUs utilized the Direct Access Implementation Activities Reports, which are posted on the CPUC’s website, by month. In updating Table 4, SCE utilized the report from July 15, 2017, whereas PG&E and SDG&E utilized the report from June 15, 2017. AReM/DACC also provide corrections to Table 4 – one to correct SCE’s applicable ESP load, and the second to correct the DA MW share of non-bypassable charges for SDG&E. The corrected table provided in AReM/DACC’s protest is pasted, below. In their joint reply to protests, both SDG&E and SCE agree with the revisions proposed by AReM/DACC, and agree to update the table accordingly. Table 5