43. Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. criteria: Development, “Fidelity measurement, and validation”. 2003; 24(3), 315-340. American Journal of Evaluation, 44. Involve notes for researchers: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care “Briefing research” 2012; National Institute for Health Research, London Accessed 23rd May 2016 Tables Table 1. Characteristics of participants in the concept mapping exercise (N=68) Participants Number: n (%) CRT staff 22 (32%) Service users 16 (24%) Academic researchers 10 (15%) Stakeholder Other mental health staff 8 (12%) Carers 6 (9%) 3rd sector staff 6 (9%) 68 (100%) UK 56 (82%) Country of CRT contact Norway 10 (15%) Australia 1 (1%) Netherlands 1 (1%) Male 25 (37%) Gender Female 42 (63%) Not reported 1 White British 39 (58%) White Irish 3 (4%) Ethnicity other 18 (27%) African/Caribbean 2 (3%) Asian 1 (1%) Mixed or other ethnic groups 4 (6%) Not reported 1 Table 2. The relationship of the CRT fidelity scale structure to concept map clusters Cluster Number of Mean of mean Number of statements from importance scores statements in the concept mapping for statements in CRT fidelity scale (N=72) this cluster (N=39)
43. Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. “Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation”. American Journal of Evaluation, 2003; 24(3), 315-340. 44. Involve “Briefing notes for researchers: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research” 2012; National Institute for Health Research, London Accessed 23rd May 2016 Tables Table 1. Characteristics of participants in the concept mapping exercise (N=68) Participants Number: n (%) Stakeholder CRT staff 22 (32%) Service users 16 (24%) Academic researchers 10 (15%) Other mental health staff 8 (12%) Carers 6 (9%) 3rd sector staff 6 (9%) 68 (100%) Country of CRT contact UK 56 (82%) Norway 10 (15%) Australia 1 (1%) Netherlands 1 (1%) Gender Male 25 (37%) Female 42 (63%) Not reported 1 Ethnicity White British 39 (58%) White Irish 3 (4%) other 18 (27%) African/Caribbean 2 (3%) Asian 1 (1%) Mixed or other ethnic groups 4 (6%) Not reported 1 Table 2. The relationship of the CRT fidelity scale structure to concept map clusters Cluster Number of statements from concept mapping (N=72) Mean of mean importance scores for statements in this cluster Number of statements in the CRT fidelity scale (N=39)