55 "B7 is set to 1 to Rather than hedge about Revised indicate MCS10 is with "you really don't permitted but not want to do this", rename recommended" -- this the bit as carrying Discussion: it is the AP to is a laugh. It's information and indicate make the decision that equivalent to saying what information it is that MCS 10 is permitted and "well, you can do it, will enable a non-AP not recommended per the but really bad things STA to determine BSS deployment. that I know about, whether to use MCS10. and am not going to Don't use words like TGah editor changes “"B7 tell you, will happen "permitted" and is set to 1 to indicate to you if you do." "recommended" unless it is permitted but not is clear which entity is recommended” to B7 is “ It is unclear on what doing this act. set to 1 to indicate that it basis a non-AP STA is recommended that an takes its metaphorical STA does not use life in its metaphorical MCS10” hands and transgresses this recommendation. Also "permitted" and "recommended" are in the passive voice. Permitted by who? Recommended by who? 51 "An S1G AP that Move to clause 10. Revised indicates support for sensor STAs does TGah editor deletes "An not indicate minimum S1G AP that indicates MCS restrictions" - support for sensor STAs this has nothing to do does not indicate minimum with frame format. MCS restrictions" from P183 L51. TGah editor adds S1G “An AP that indicates support for sensor STAs does not indicate minimum MCS restrictions" at the end of last paragragh in 10.50.6 BSS basic S1G-MCS and NSS set operation 42 "NOTE 1--For error Change "STA Accepted recovery, a STA participating in a BDT participating in a BDT exchange" to "BDT exchange can Initiator". transmit the next frame" -- this statement is misleading, because error recovery is uniquely the responsibility of the initiator.
55 "B7 is set to 1 to indicate MCS10 is permitted but not recommended" -- this is a laugh. It's equivalent to saying "well, you can do it, but really bad things that I know about, and am not going to tell you, will happen to you if you do." It is unclear on what basis a non-AP STA takes its metaphorical life in its metaphorical hands and transgresses this recommendation. Also "permitted" and "recommended" are in the passive voice. Permitted by who? Recommended by who? Rather than hedge about with "you really don't want to do this", rename the bit as carrying information and indicate what information it is that will enable a non-AP STA to determine whether to use MCS10. Don't use words like "permitted" and "recommended" unless it is clear which entity is doing this act. Revised Discussion: it is the AP to make the decision that MCS 10 is permitted and not recommended per the BSS deployment. TGah editor changes “"B7 is set to 1 to indicate is permitted but not recommended” to “ B7 is set to 1 to indicate that it is recommended that an STA does not use MCS10” 51 "An S1G AP that indicates support for sensor STAs does not indicate minimum MCS restrictions" - this has nothing to do with frame format. Move to clause 10. Revised TGah editor deletes "An S1G AP that indicates support for sensor STAs does not indicate minimum MCS restrictions" from P183 L51. TGah editor adds “An S1G AP that indicates support for sensor STAs does not indicate minimum MCS restrictions" at the end of last paragragh in 10.50.6 BSS basic S1G-MCS and NSS set operation 42 "NOTE 1--For error recovery, a STA participating in a BDT exchange can transmit the next frame" -- this statement is misleading, because error recovery is uniquely the responsibility of the initiator. Change "STA participating in a BDT exchange" to "BDT Initiator". Accepted