Conduct a metering pilot to determine Consider participant non-participant, whether AMI data can be leveraged to 3 HVAC types, 6 key climate zones fill all the strata needed based on and at least 5 building types means Field monitoring will be done for comparison to direct end use meters 180 strata for sampling. Therefore Upstream HVAC both participant and non-participant with remote communications. Package and even minimal samples will create Program Impact units in the residential and split systems costs far exceeding the budget for Evaluation commercial sectors across a variety A phone survey and followup onsite even simple metering of unit power. of climate zones and building types Sampling detailed performance effort to verify installations and characterize installed application may be would further limit the sample by able to achieve large samples. increasing cost per point. Focus on in the two 2010-12 Study sample doesn’t offer programs (QI and To Code) since the for much follow-up beyond the Either conduct a follow-up to 10-12 budget is $500k. The larger market PG&E Compliance follow-up; Field study or a new study depending on assessment should conduct the measurements without monitoring participation levels and program assessments since the budget may be required for the allocated Quality design changes. is $1.25M. Non-participants under 2008 Impact Evaluation budget or combine this with the Installation, Title 24 would include installs from of QI and To Code Upstream effort To Code 2009 to June 2014. Program Installation Conduct field monitoring of participants (both QI and “To as well as sites where a Code”) permit was not pulled for a variety of climate zones and building types. Ex-post observations followed by debrief to program and technician. Evaluation should focus on may include case study which measures/treatments that have the may be presented to the technicians as a Several issues with the pre-post highest uncertainty in projected training opportunity and to estimate Impact Evaluation Quality design as documented by WO32, but savings for both the residential and achieved and remaining energy savings of QM Program Maintenance pre-post is still the preferred ex post commercial sectors. Pre/post potential. method monitoring and/or billing analysis of participating units. Without pre-measurement, installation rate is primary parameter measured, some UES assumptions in workpapers
Upstream HVAC Program Impact Evaluation Package and split systems Field monitoring will be done for both participant and non-participant units in the residential and commercial sectors across a variety of climate zones and building types Consider participant non-participant, 3 HVAC types, 6 key climate zones and at least 5 building types means 180 strata for sampling. Therefore even minimal samples will create costs far exceeding the budget for even simple metering of unit power. Sampling detailed performance would further limit the sample by increasing cost per point. Conduct a metering pilot to determine whether AMI data can be leveraged to fill all the strata needed based on comparison to direct end use meters with remote communications. A phone survey and followup onsite effort to verify installations and characterize installed application may be able to achieve large samples. Impact Evaluation of QI and To Code Program Quality Installation, To Code Installation Either conduct a follow-up to 10-12 study or a new study depending on participation levels and program design changes. 2010-12 Study sample doesn’t offer for much follow-up beyond the PG&E Compliance follow-up; Field measurements without monitoring may be required for the allocated budget or combine this with the Upstream effort Focus on in the two programs (QI and To Code) since the budget is $500k. The larger market assessment should conduct the assessments since the budget is $1.25M. Non-participants under 2008 Title 24 would include installs from 2009 to June 2014. Conduct field monitoring of participants (both QI and “To Code”) as well as sites where a permit was not pulled for a variety of climate zones and building types. Impact Evaluation of QM Program Quality Maintenance Evaluation should focus on measures/treatments that have the highest uncertainty in projected savings for both the residential and commercial sectors. Pre/post monitoring and/or billing analysis of participating units. Several issues with the pre-post design as documented by WO32, but pre-post is still the preferred ex post method Ex-post observations followed by debrief to program and technician. may include case study which may be presented to the technicians as a training opportunity and to estimate achieved and remaining energy savings potential. Without pre-measurement, installation rate is primary parameter measured, some UES assumptions in workpapers