Criteria for the Evaluation of an Assignment Grade A Exemplary B Adequate C Poor Criteria The content was The content was It was unclear as to clear and useful. generally relevant, how the content Content The writer gave but was somewhat related to the specific answers unclear or being considered. relevant to the confusing at times. topic. The writer was The writer was able The writer did little thought provoking to reflect on the more than restate Critical and showed strong topic. A Thoughtful facts and other Analysis insight in applying assessment was people’s (authors’) class materials to included. opinions. the cased or topic. Spelling and Although most of The paper was grammar were the paper was well poorly written – followed. Technical written, a more making it difficult writing rules were than a few to determine the followed. grammar, spelling, writers points. Spelling and and/or technical Numerous Grammar errors were grammatical and present. spelling errors were present. The text did not follow rules for technical writing. The paper lacks The paper meets one or a few The paper was the requirements elements that are poorly written. Overall Quality for the degree important for the program for program student is enrolled
Criteria for the Evaluation of an Assignment Grade Criteria A Exemplary B Adequate C Poor Content The content was clear and useful. The writer gave specific answers relevant to the topic. The content was generally relevant, but was somewhat unclear or confusing at times. It was unclear as to how the content related to the being considered. Critical Analysis The writer was thought provoking and showed strong insight in applying class materials to the cased or topic. The writer was able to reflect on the topic. A Thoughtful assessment was included. The writer did little more than restate facts and other people’s (authors’) opinions. Spelling and Grammar Spelling and grammar were followed. Technical writing rules were followed. Although most of the paper was well written, a more than a few grammar, spelling, and/or technical errors were present. The paper was poorly written – making it difficult to determine the writers points. Numerous grammatical and spelling errors were present. The text did not follow rules for technical writing. Overall Quality The paper meets the requirements for the degree program for student is enrolled The paper lacks one or a few elements that are important for the program The paper was poorly written.