Content Big M The Protects of Drug against the PURPOSE mart cannot Lord’s Day Act of coerce which was legislation individuals historically to affirm a enacted to specific enforce religious Christian belief or morals note manifest a prohibited not specific working as religious well as practice gambling, Religious entertainment, within etc. Big M Canada Drug Mart should be afforded equal treatment. Content Edwards An incidental or Ontario’s of EFFECT Books inadvertent Retail Business of burden on an Holiday’s Act legislation individual’s infringed s.2(a) ability to (although practice their saved by s.1) religion is b/c it had a enough to negative trigger s.2(a) impact on EVEN when the Saturday legislation has a worshipers, as valid purpose. imposed The burden competitive need only be pressure to more than stay open on trivial. Saturdays and therefore was an incidental burden. Edwards 2(b) Freedom of Expression Case Ratio Examples
Content of PURPOSE of legislation Big M Drug mart The cannot coerce individuals to affirm a specific religious belief or manifest a specific religious practice Religious within Canada should be afforded equal treatment. Protects against the Lord’s Day Act which was historically enacted to enforce Christian morals note prohibited not working as well as gambling, entertainment, etc. Big M Drug Mart Content of EFFECT of legislation Edwards Books An incidental or inadvertent burden on an individual’s ability to practice their religion is enough to trigger s.2(a) EVEN when the legislation has a valid purpose. The burden need only be more than trivial. Ontario’s Retail Business Holiday’s Act infringed s.2(a) (although saved by s.1) b/c it had a negative impact on Saturday worshipers, as imposed competitive pressure to stay open on Saturdays and therefore was an incidental burden. Edwards 2(b) Freedom of Expression Case Ratio Examples