when person walked on Mars, seisen sprang to heir in B’s futuro. example 4: T devises Blackacre "to A for life, then for life to A's eldest child who survives A, then to the eldest child of that child for life, then to B." "Eldest child who survives A" is construed to mean the eldest of the children living at the death of A. A, B, and A's first child S survive T. for life to eldest child who survives “then A’s A” (valid) proof: The remainder is good—it will vest or not at end of A’s life. Know who it is at death of A; this is a valid remainder in eldest child. A serves as validating life bridging the gap from when T dies to when eldest interest vests. All we A’s child’s need to do is survive A—both of those will happen within A’s life. to the eldest child of that child for (void) “then life” proof: after T dies, X is born to A. Now have a child born to A after the interest is created. We need Y to be born to some other family. Now, we get a war. Everyone is dead, except for X and Y. Thirty years later they have a child. When they have a child, 30 years later, when that child is born, that interest vests. It vests at birth. But, that is thirty years after lives of being are all dead. to (valid) “then B” interest in B is vested in B fertile octogenarian example: T devises A for life, then to the children of A for life, then to the “To grandchildren of A then A is 99 years old. living.” proof: Interest in grandchildren is void. A might have X or Y. Everyone else dies. As soon as that child is born, that interest might vest. unborn widow example: T devises in trust A for life, then to widow for life, then to the “to A’s issue then living of A. proof: Transfer occurs. T dies. Then W is born. And then she grows up. Marries to A. And then A dies. And a long time later widow A’s dies. Much too late. Need to kill everyone else off. The interest is void. Might vest too late
when person walked on Mars, seisen sprang to B’s heir in futuro. example 4: T devises Blackacre "to A for life, then for life to A's eldest child who survives A, then to the eldest child of that child for life, then to B." "Eldest child who survives A" is construed to mean the eldest of the children living at the death of A. A, B, and A's first child S survive T. “then for life to A’s eldest child who survives A” (valid) proof: The remainder is good—it will vest or not at end of A’s life. Know who it is at death of A; this is a valid remainder in eldest child. A serves as validating life bridging the gap from when T dies to when A’s eldest child’s interest vests. All we need to do is survive A—both of those will happen within A’s life. “then to the eldest child of that child for life” (void) proof: after T dies, X is born to A. Now have a child born to A after the interest is created. We need Y to be born to some other family. Now, we get a war. Everyone is dead, except for X and Y. Thirty years later they have a child. When they have a child, 30 years later, when that child is born, that interest vests. It vests at birth. But, that is thirty years after lives of being are all dead. “then to B” (valid) interest in B is vested in B fertile octogenarian example: T devises “To A for life, then to the children of A for life, then to the grandchildren of A then living.” A is 99 years old. proof: Interest in grandchildren is void. A might have X or Y. Everyone else dies. As soon as that child is born, that interest might vest. unborn widow example: T devises in trust “to A for life, then to A’s widow for life, then to the issue then living of A. proof: Transfer occurs. T dies. Then W is born. And then she grows up. Marries to A. And then A dies. And a long time later A’s widow dies. Much too late. Need to kill everyone else off. The interest is void. Might vest too late