program’s credits are available. Discuss the rationale for the change. Provide evidence of the legal authority for the change, if applicable. List institutional strengths that facilitate implementing the proposed change. Part II. Assessment of Compliance Provide narrative and documentation to support compliance with each standard, emphasizing impact of the electronic expansion on that aspect of the institution. See the Commission policy and “Distance Correspondence Education.” The emphasis throughout this document should be on the programs being delivered electronically and related institutional support. Section 1: The Principle of Integrity 1.1 The institution operates with integrity in all matters. [CR] (Integrity) [No response necessary. This standard will be addressed by the visiting committee, not by the institution.] Narrative: Section 5: Administration and Organization 5.4 The institution employs and regularly evaluates administrative and academic officers with appropriate experience and qualifications to lead the institution. (Qualified administrative/academic officers) Narrative: Section 6: Faculty 6.2 For each of its educational programs, the institution 6.2.a Justifies and documents the qualifications of its faculty members. (Faculty qualifications) [Provide faculty qualifications on the Commission’s “Faculty Roster Form.” Identify new faculty hired to support this initiative. Limit entries to those faculty members assigned to the distance education program(s). For graduate programs, include documentation of the scholarship and research capability of faculty. For doctoral programs, include documentation of faculty experience in directing dissertation research.] Narrative: 6.2.b Employs a sufficient number of full-time faculty members to ensure curriculum and program quality, integrity, and review.
program’s credits are available. Discuss the rationale for the change. Provide evidence of the legal authority for the change, if applicable. List institutional strengths that facilitate implementing the proposed change. Part II. Assessment of Compliance Provide narrative and documentation to support compliance with each standard, emphasizing impact of the electronic expansion on that aspect of the institution. See the Commission policy “Distance and Correspondence Education.” The emphasis throughout this document should be on the programs being delivered electronically and related institutional support. Section 1: The Principle of Integrity 1.1 The institution operates with integrity in all matters. (Integrity) [CR] [No response necessary. This standard will be addressed by the visiting committee, not by the institution.] Narrative: Section 5: Administration and Organization 5.4 The institution employs and regularly evaluates administrative and academic officers with appropriate experience and qualifications to lead the institution. (Qualified administrative/academic officers) Narrative: Section 6: Faculty 6.2 For each of its educational programs, the institution 6.2.a Justifies and documents the qualifications of its faculty members. (Faculty qualifications) [Provide faculty qualifications on the Commission’s “Faculty Roster Form.” Identify new faculty hired to support this initiative. Limit entries to those faculty members assigned to the distance education program(s). For graduate programs, include documentation of the scholarship and research capability of faculty. For doctoral programs, include documentation of faculty experience in directing dissertation research.] Narrative: 6.2.b Employs a sufficient number of full-time faculty members to ensure curriculum and program quality, integrity, and review.