UK External Review Committee Institutional Recommendation CPE Program Review Rubric Institution: Degree Designation as on Diploma: Program Name: CIP Code: Program Type: Program Implementation Date: Submission Date: External Review Committee Recommendation: Maintain Without Modification Maintain With Modification Needs Further Review Comments (200 word limit): Program Review Note for unacceptable rating: Any Committee criterion that the committee Numerical Rating identifies as must “unacceptable” Level 1: Unacceptable 2: Acceptable Level 3: Excellent Rating have a recommended action for ( 2, or 3) improvement in the comments 1, Acceptable=2, section and in the External Review or Excellent=3) Committee Recommendation Report. A. Centrality to the Institution's Mission and Consistency with State's Goals Consistency with Institutional Program demonstrates Program somewhat Program demonstrates Mission/Strategic Agenda/ little or no relation/ demonstrates relation/ strong, committed relation/ A.1. Strategic Implementation contribution to contribution to contribution to institutional Plan and Contribution to institutional mission. institutional mission. mission. institutional mission Contribution to economic and Program somewhat Program demonstrates Program demonstrates social welfare goals of HB1 as demonstrates strong, committed little or no contribution to A.2. delineated in the statewide contribution to the contribution to state's the state's economic and postsecondary education economic and social economic and social welfare social welfare goals. strategic agenda* welfare goals. goals. Alignment with statewide Program is not aligned with Program is somewhat Program proactively postsecondary education A.3. statewide implementation aligned with statewide advances the statewide strategic implementation plan. implementation plan. implementation plan. plan** B. Program Quality and Student Success Description of assessment results indicate an assessment plan is in Description of assessment Description of assessment and results have been results is comprehensive, results indicates that no used to improve the including explanations of Program Quality and Student assessment plan is in place program, but important how each SLO was measured B.1. Success or that a plan was in place, elements (e.g., use of both and how often, what Use of assessment results but assessment results direct and indirect benchmarks or targets were have not been used to measures, all SLOs set, and how results were improve the program. covered by some form of used to make improvements assessment, use of to the program. benchmarks or targets) are missing.
UK External Review Committee Institutional Recommendation CPE Program Review Rubric Institution: Degree Designation as on Diploma: Program Name: CIP Code: Program Type: Program Implementation Date: Submission Date: External Review Committee Recommendation: Maintain Without Modification Maintain With Modification Needs Further Review Level 1: Unacceptable 2: Acceptable Level 3: Excellent Program Review Committee Rating Acceptable=2, or Excellent=3) Numerical Rating ( 1, 2, or 3) Comments (200 word limit): Note for unacceptable rating: Any criterion that the committee identifies as “unacceptable” must have a recommended action for improvement in the comments section and in the External Review Committee Recommendation Report. A. Centrality to the Institution's Mission and Consistency with State's Goals A.1. Consistency with Institutional Mission/Strategic Agenda/ Strategic Implementation Plan and Contribution to institutional mission Program demonstrates little or no relation/ contribution to institutional mission. Program somewhat demonstrates relation/ contribution to institutional mission. Program demonstrates strong, committed relation/ contribution to institutional mission. A.2. Contribution to economic and social welfare goals of HB1 as delineated in the statewide postsecondary education strategic agenda* Program demonstrates little or no contribution to the state's economic and social welfare goals. Program somewhat demonstrates contribution to the economic and social welfare goals. Program demonstrates strong, committed contribution to state's economic and social welfare goals. A.3. Alignment with statewide postsecondary education strategic implementation plan** Program is not aligned with statewide implementation plan. Program is somewhat aligned with statewide implementation plan. Program proactively advances the statewide implementation plan. B. Program Quality and Student Success B.1. Program Quality and Student Success Use of assessment results Description of assessment results indicates that no assessment plan is in place or that a plan was in place, but assessment results have not been used to improve the program. Description of assessment results indicate an assessment plan is in and results have been used to improve the program, but important elements (e.g., use of both direct and indirect measures, all SLOs covered by some form of assessment, use of benchmarks or targets) are missing. Description of assessment results is comprehensive, including explanations of how each SLO was measured and how often, what benchmarks or targets were set, and how results were used to make improvements to the program.