1- Needs Development 2- Effective 3- Very Effective SCORE COMMENTS Professional Demeanor Has a clear organizational structure Avoids jargon Is readable for both lay and professional audiences No typos or grammatical errors Includes a signature of supervisor and position of supervisor Includes signature of student and indicates practicum or internship status Provides accurate and in-depth description of the child’s functioning, capabilities, needs, and situational challenges Provides conclusions that on intervention efforts and determine the range of available options Provides insights and recommendations that improve the functioning and well-being of the child OVERALL SCORE: OVERALL COMMENTS: Rubric for Evaluating Portfolio To be completed by faculty supervisor The rating scale for the final portfolio will be the following: 0 Unsatisfactory 1 Basic 2 Proficient 3 Distinguished (a) Materials missing, (a) Materials (a) Materials generally (a) Materials complete, (b) (b) Disorganized, (c) incomplete, (b) complete, (b) Exceptional appearance and Evidence of poor Questionable Professional appearance organization, (c) Well performance, organization or and organization, (c) written and clearly (d) Incomplete logs - appearance, (c) Written Clearly written, (d) documented, (d) Complete not documenting communication is Appropriate and and detailed contents hours, basic unclear, (d) Content sufficient content and requirements, and lacks some information documentation supervision Each domain will be evaluated with the following rubric. Domains Rubric: Assessment 0 Unsatisfactory 1 Basic 2 Proficient 3 Distinguished Criteria Artifact None submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted
1- Needs Development 2- Effective 3- Very Effective SCORE COMMENTS Professional Demeanor Has a clear organizational structure Avoids jargon Is readable for both lay and professional audiences No typos or grammatical errors Includes a signature of supervisor and position of supervisor Includes signature of student and indicates practicum or internship status Provides accurate and in-depth description of the child’s functioning, capabilities, needs, and situational challenges Provides conclusions that on intervention efforts and determine the range of available options Provides insights and recommendations that improve the functioning and well-being of the child OVERALL SCORE: OVERALL COMMENTS: Rubric for Evaluating Portfolio To be completed by faculty supervisor The rating scale for the final portfolio will be the following: 0 Unsatisfactory 1 Basic 2 Proficient 3 Distinguished (a) Materials missing, (b) Disorganized, (c) Evidence of poor performance, (d) Incomplete logs - not documenting hours, basic requirements, and supervision (a) Materials incomplete, (b) Questionable organization or appearance, (c) Written communication is unclear, (d) Content lacks some information (a) Materials generally complete, (b) Professional appearance and organization, (c) Clearly written, (d) Appropriate and sufficient content and documentation (a) Materials complete, (b) Exceptional appearance and organization, (c) Well written and clearly documented, (d) Complete and detailed contents Each domain will be evaluated with the following rubric. Domains Rubric: Assessment Criteria 0 Unsatisfactory 1 Basic 2 Proficient 3 Distinguished Artifact None submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted