URC Summer TEAM Fellowship Evaluation Team Name: Please score each criterion from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); multiply score by weight to find total score Criteria Score Weight Score How clearly stated are the hypothesis/thesis/outcomes and 3 motivation? (1- not clearly stated; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) Is enough background provided to contextualize the 2 thesis/hypothesis/outcomes? (1- not clearly described; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) Is the role/plan for the mentor and each student clearly outlined? 2 (1- not clearly described; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) How feasible is the research plan for the students during the 3 summer research period? (1- not enough information is provided; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) Bibliography (1- minimal; 3- adequate; 5- well documented) 1 Specific and strongly supportive letter of recommendation 3 (1- not very supportive; 3- moderately supportive; 5- supportive) How clearly stated are the individual sections from each student? average 4 (0- not provided; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) student Student 1: _______ Student 4: _______ score: Student 2: _______ Student 5: _______ Student 3: _______ How relevant is the project to the student’s prior preparation? (1- average 2 not related; 3- moderately related; 5- substantially impactful, student potentially transformative ) score: Student 1: _______ Student 4: _______ Student 2: _______ Student 5: _______ Student 3: _______ Strength of each student’s academic record average 1 Student 1: _______ Student 4: _______ student Student 2: _______ Student 5: _______ score: Student 3: _______ IUCAC and IRB Approvals are included (where needed) yes no Notes/Comments
URC Summer TEAM Fellowship Evaluation Team Name: Please score each criterion from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); multiply score by weight to find total score Criteria Score Weight Score How clearly stated are the hypothesis/thesis/outcomes and motivation? (1- not clearly stated; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) 3 Is enough background provided to contextualize the thesis/hypothesis/outcomes? (1- not clearly described; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) 2 Is the role/plan for the mentor and each student clearly outlined? (1- not clearly described; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) 2 How feasible is the research plan for the students during the summer research period? (1- not enough information is provided; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) 3 Bibliography (1- minimal; 3- adequate; 5- well documented) 1 Specific and strongly supportive letter of recommendation (1- not very supportive; 3- moderately supportive; 5- supportive) 3 How clearly stated are the individual sections from each student? (0- not provided; 3- moderately clear; 5- well described) Student 1: _______ Student 4: _______ Student 2: _______ Student 5: _______ Student 3: _______ average student score: 4 How relevant is the project to the student’s prior preparation? (1- not related; 3- moderately related; 5- substantially impactful, potentially transformative ) Student 1: _______ Student 4: _______ Student 2: _______ Student 5: _______ Student 3: _______ average student score: 2 Strength of each student’s academic record Student 1: _______ Student 4: _______ Student 2: _______ Student 5: _______ Student 3: _______ average student score: 1 IUCAC and IRB Approvals are included (where needed) yes no Notes/Comments