and proposed cancellation ceiling and made the award no earlier than 31 days after notification? C.76 Has CO ensured that, for award of FAR 19.1303(d) a HUBZone Contract, the awardee is a HUBZone small business concern at both time of initial offer and time of award? C.77 Has CO entered contract into FAR 4.604(b); Prism/Compusearch (NBS) and 304.602 completed DCIS documentation within required timeframes? C.78 Has source selection information FAR 3.104-4 been appropriately marked? No. Action Item FAR/HHSAR Yes No N/A Comments Part 2-STEP SB – ADDITIONAL ITEMS C.79 Were technical proposals submitted FAR 14.503-1, in Step 1 timely and handled 14.401, 14.403(a) properly? C.80 Were late technical proposals FAR 14.502-1(b) submitted in response to Step 1 RTP handled properly? C.81 If 2-step sealed bidding, are FAR proposals properly evaluated and categorized as acceptable, reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable, or unacceptable? C.82 If 2-step sealed bidding, are FAR proposals which modified, or failed
and proposed cancellation ceiling and made the award no earlier than 31 days after notification? C.76 Has CO ensured that, for award of a HUBZone Contract, the awardee is a HUBZone small business concern at both time of initial offer and time of award? FAR 19.1303(d) C.77 Has CO entered contract into Prism/Compusearch (NBS) and completed DCIS documentation within required timeframes? FAR 4.604(b); 304.602 C.78 Has source selection information been appropriately marked? FAR 3.104-4 No. Action Item FAR/HHSAR Part Yes No N/A Comments 2-STEP SB – ADDITIONAL ITEMS C.79 Were technical proposals submitted in Step 1 timely and handled properly? FAR 14.503-1, 14.401, 14.403(a) C.80 Were late technical proposals submitted in response to Step 1 RTP handled properly? FAR 14.502-1(b) C.81 If 2-step sealed bidding, are proposals properly evaluated and categorized as acceptable, reasonably susceptible of being made acceptable, or unacceptable? FAR C.82 If 2-step sealed bidding, are proposals which modified, or failed FAR