social and and professional ethics measure, and a develop constructive communication online and was ethical multicultural sensibility measure. approaches to addressing social and Social Responsibility: The mean score provided to all responsibility. The survey was launched online in April ethical issues, demonstrate a more of all students was 3.49. Ethics: The communication 2018. sophisticated sense of responsibility mean score of all students was 4.05; classes. and be more engaged in community Multicultural Sensitivity: The mean activities. We expect that students will score of all students was 2.62. Data is be above average on each scale (a reviewed by score above of 3.0 on the Social There were no significant differences Associate Responsibility and Ethics scales, a across gender, race, and class. Results Chair. score below 3.0 on the Multicultural indicate that students scored above Sensitivity scale). average on two of the three scales. The assessment report will be posted on our departmental intranet site and discussed at departmental planning retreat in August 2018. 4. Students Communication Flexibility: The entire The general expectation is that Students completed a survey containing Rubrics are will create department was assessed in a students will demonstrate competence the Communication Flexibility scale, completed by and survey includes a in the creation and implementation of plus additional demographic items. The individual implement communication flexibility scale which message strategies in diverse mean score on the Communication faculty in their message demonstrates students’ abilities to adapt contexts. Flexibility scale was 3.49. There were no specific strategies in messages in diverse contexts. The survey significant differences across gender, classes. diverse was launched online in April 2018. Expectations are that students will be class level, time spent at EIU or GPA. contexts with able to create a variety of messages in Data is emphasis on various contexts. We expect that reviewed by multimedia, students will score above average on the Associate Chair.
social and ethical responsibility. and professional ethics measure, and a multicultural sensibility measure. The survey was launched online in April 2018. develop constructive communication approaches to addressing social and ethical issues, demonstrate a more sophisticated sense of responsibility and be more engaged in community activities. We expect that students will be above average on each scale (a score above of 3.0 on the Social Responsibility and Ethics scales, a score below 3.0 on the Multicultural Sensitivity scale). Social Responsibility: The mean score of all students was 3.49. Ethics: The mean score of all students was 4.05; Multicultural Sensitivity: The mean score of all students was 2.62. There were no significant differences across gender, race, and class. Results indicate that students scored above average on two of the three scales. online and was provided to all communication classes. Data is reviewed by Associate Chair. The assessment report will be posted on our departmental intranet site and discussed at departmental planning retreat in August 2018. 4. Students will create and implement message strategies in diverse contexts with emphasis on multimedia, Communication Flexibility: The entire department was assessed in a survey includes a communication flexibility scale which demonstrates students’ abilities to adapt messages in diverse contexts. The survey was launched online in April 2018. The general expectation is that students will demonstrate competence in the creation and implementation of message strategies in diverse contexts. Expectations are that students will be able to create a variety of messages in various contexts. We expect that students will score above average on Students completed a survey containing the Communication Flexibility scale, plus additional demographic items. The mean score on the Communication Flexibility scale was 3.49. There were no significant differences across gender, class level, time spent at EIU or GPA. Rubrics are completed by individual faculty in their specific classes. Data is reviewed by the Associate Chair.