Figure : Example of LRA flexible capacity deficiency analysis. In the example LRA_A receives full credit for all of LSE1’s Category 2 capacity even though the amount shown is greater than LSE1’s individual Category 2 maximum. If the total ISO system was short of its flexible capacity needs, LSEs under the jurisdiction of LRA_A and LRA_B would not be allocated a portion of the possible CPM cost. Individual Load Serving Entity Analysis ISO Tariff Section 40.10.5.6(a)(2) If the cumulative ISO system is short of its flexible needs, and an LRA is short of its flexible needs, the ISO will calculate the individual LSE deficiency for LSEs under the jurisdiction of the deficient LRA. The ISO will provide the pertinent results of this calculation to the deficient LRA and the scheduling coordinator for each LSE of that LRA to show the risk of CPM designation and cost allocation, calculated using the ISO method. This calculation will also be used to determine compliance with ISO Tariff Section 40.10.5.3 for LSEs under the jurisdiction of a Local Regulatory Authority that has not established a flexible need allocation methodology. The example below demonstrates how this analysis is performed. Figure : Example of individual LSE flexible capacity deficiency analysis. In to simplify the example above, the ISO only shows the analysis for LSE1, LSE4, and LSE5; in practice, all LSEs under the jurisdiction of LRAs that have not established a cost allocation methodology will be analyzed. LSE4 is short of its total flexible need because the ISO capped the Category 2 showings at the individual LSE’s Category 2 maximum. Even though LSE4 meets its Base Ramping need, this LSE is 10 MW short for purposes of determining its CPM cost allocation. LSE1 and LSE5 meet their respective requirements. Finding and Notification ISO Tariff Section 40.10.5.4, 40.10.5.5, and 40.10.5.6
Figure : Example of LRA flexible capacity deficiency analysis. In the example LRA_A receives full credit for all of LSE1’s Category 2 capacity even though the amount shown is greater than LSE1’s individual Category 2 maximum. If the total ISO system was short of its flexible capacity needs, LSEs under the jurisdiction of LRA_A and LRA_B would not be allocated a portion of the possible CPM cost. Individual Load Serving Entity Analysis ISO Tariff Section 40.10.5.6(a)(2) If the cumulative ISO system is short of its flexible needs, and an LRA is short of its flexible needs, the ISO will calculate the individual LSE deficiency for LSEs under the jurisdiction of the deficient LRA. The ISO will provide the pertinent results of this calculation to the deficient LRA and the scheduling coordinator for each LSE of that LRA to show the risk of CPM designation and cost allocation, calculated using the ISO method. This calculation will also be used to determine compliance with ISO Tariff Section 40.10.5.3 for LSEs under the jurisdiction of a Local Regulatory Authority that has not established a flexible need allocation methodology. The example below demonstrates how this analysis is performed. Figure : Example of individual LSE flexible capacity deficiency analysis. In to simplify the example above, the ISO only shows the analysis for LSE1, LSE4, and LSE5; in practice, all LSEs under the jurisdiction of LRAs that have not established a cost allocation methodology will be analyzed. LSE4 is short of its total flexible need because the ISO capped the Category 2 showings at the individual LSE’s Category 2 maximum. Even though LSE4 meets its Base Ramping need, this LSE is 10 MW short for purposes of determining its CPM cost allocation. LSE1 and LSE5 meet their respective requirements. Finding and Notification ISO Tariff Section 40.10.5.4, 40.10.5.5, and 40.10.5.6