Date: __________ Student Progress (Committee Meeting) Rubric Completed by: – (To be completed by each committee member. Please check boxes for all evaluation criteria that you feel are appropriate within each attribute category) Does Not Meet Expectations Attribute Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Please provide a short explanation for each attribute that you select in this category Overall quality Poorly organized Clearly organized Well organized of responses Lacks careful, critical thinking skills Responses are adequate Responses are exceptional Does not reflect understanding of subject matter Demonstrates average critical thinking skills Exhibits mature, critical thinking skills and pertinent literature Exhibits understanding of subject matter and Exhibits mastery of subject matter and pertinent Arguments are weak, inconsistent or pertinent literature literature. unconvincing Arguments are coherent Arguments are exceptional Demonstrates little understanding of theoretical Demonstrates average understanding of Demonstrates exceptional understanding of concepts theoretical concepts theoretical concepts Displays limited creativity and insight Displays some creativity and insight Displays superior creativity and insight Overall breadth Majority of responses unacceptable Majority of responses acceptable All responses acceptable of knowledge Responses reveal critical weaknesses in depth of Responses reveal some depth of knowledge in Responses reveal exceptional depth of knowledge in knowledge in subject matter subject matter subject matter Reponses reflect limited critical thinking skills Reponses reflect above average critical thinking Reponses reflect well developed critical thinking skills skills Reponses are narrow in scope Reponses reveal the ability to interconnect and Responses reveal the ability to draw from extend knowledge from multiple disciplines knowledge in several disciplines Quality of Responses are incomplete or require prompting Responses are complete Arguments are well Responses are eloquent organized Responses to Arguments are poorly presented Arguments are skillfully presented Questions Respondent exhibits adequate knowledge in Respondent exhibits lack of knowledge in subject Respondent exhibits superior knowledge in subject subject area area area Responses meet expected of a Ph.D. Responses do not meet level expected of a Ph.D. Responses exceed level expected of a Ph.D. graduate graduate graduate Overall Does not meet expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Assessment Constructive Comments for Student:
Student Progress (Committee Meeting) Rubric – Completed by: Date: __________ (To be completed by each committee member. Please check boxes for all evaluation criteria that you feel are appropriate within each attribute category) Attribute Does Not Meet Expectations Please provide a short explanation for each attribute that you select in this category Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Overall quality of responses Poorly organized Lacks careful, critical thinking skills Does not reflect understanding of subject matter and pertinent literature Arguments are weak, inconsistent or unconvincing Demonstrates little understanding of theoretical concepts Displays limited creativity and insight Clearly organized Responses are adequate Demonstrates average critical thinking skills Exhibits understanding of subject matter and pertinent literature Arguments are coherent Demonstrates average understanding of theoretical concepts Displays some creativity and insight Well organized Responses are exceptional Exhibits mature, critical thinking skills Exhibits mastery of subject matter and pertinent literature. Arguments are exceptional Demonstrates exceptional understanding of theoretical concepts Displays superior creativity and insight Overall breadth of knowledge Majority of responses unacceptable Responses reveal critical weaknesses in depth of knowledge in subject matter Reponses reflect limited critical thinking skills Reponses are narrow in scope Majority of responses acceptable Responses reveal some depth of knowledge in subject matter Reponses reflect above average critical thinking skills Responses reveal the ability to draw from knowledge in several disciplines All responses acceptable Responses reveal exceptional depth of knowledge in subject matter Reponses reflect well developed critical thinking skills Reponses reveal the ability to interconnect and extend knowledge from multiple disciplines Quality of Responses to Questions Responses are incomplete or require prompting Arguments are poorly presented Respondent exhibits lack of knowledge in subject area Responses do not meet level expected of a Ph.D. graduate Responses are complete Arguments are well organized Respondent exhibits adequate knowledge in subject area Responses meet expected of a Ph.D. graduate Responses are eloquent Arguments are skillfully presented Respondent exhibits superior knowledge in subject area Responses exceed level expected of a Ph.D. graduate Overall Assessment Does not meet expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Constructive Comments for Student: