Team Name: Name of Team Members: Identifying the Showed a clear understanding of Needed some teacher Needed lots of teacher directing to Points: problem(s) and the problem(s) to solve. direction to define the define the problem(s) and brainstorming Independently brainstormed problem(s) and brainstorm brainstorm possible solutions solutions solutions. possible solutions Working as a team Worked well together. All team Some team members were Most team members were often Points: member members participated and stayed occasionally off task. off task and not cooperating or on task. participating fully. Using the design Team brainstormed many design Some team members Team brainstormed few design Points: process ideas and tested and improved were occasionally off task ideas and did little testing or the design. Final design complete redesigning. Final design lacks or nearly complete and shows clear design idea(s). creative problem solving. Processing the Team gave a strong presentation Team gave a basic Team gave a weak presentation of Points: science and of its solution to the challenge presentation of its solution its solution to the challenge and engineering and showed clear understanding to the challenge and showed showed little understanding of the of the science concepts and basic understanding of the science concepts and design design process. science concepts and design process. process. Product Team successfully created an Team create a sample close Team was not able to create a new Points: paint that match a paint to a paint chip and the line of eco-friendly paint that chip as well as variations of the variations. matched a paint chip nor any color. variations. Communication/ Team created a well written Team created a basic written Team created a poor written Points: Presentation report of how to create their report of how to create their report of how to create their line of paint. eco-friendly line of paint. line of paint or did not create one at all. Comments: Total Points:
Team Name: Name of Team Members: Identifying the problem(s) and brainstorming solutions Showed a clear understanding of the problem(s) to solve. Independently brainstormed solutions. Needed some teacher direction to define the problem(s) and brainstorm possible solutions Needed lots of teacher directing to define the problem(s) and brainstorm possible solutions Points: Working as a team member Worked well together. All team members participated and stayed on task. Some team members were occasionally off task. Most team members were often off task and not cooperating or participating fully. Points: Using the design process Team brainstormed many design ideas and tested and improved the design. Final design complete or nearly complete and shows creative problem solving. Some team members were occasionally off task Team brainstormed few design ideas and did little testing or redesigning. Final design lacks clear design idea(s). Points: Processing the science and engineering Team gave a strong presentation of its solution to the challenge and showed clear understanding of the science concepts and design process. Team gave a basic presentation of its solution to the challenge and showed basic understanding of the science concepts and design process. Team gave a weak presentation of its solution to the challenge and showed little understanding of the science concepts and design process. Points: Product Team successfully created an paint that match a paint chip as well as variations of the color. Team create a sample close to a paint chip and the variations. Team was not able to create a new line of eco-friendly paint that matched a paint chip nor any variations. Points: Communication/ Presentation Team created a well written report of how to create their line of paint. Team created a basic written report of how to create their eco-friendly line of paint. Team created a poor written report of how to create their line of paint or did not create one at all. Points: Comments: Total Points: