Idea of being a - how can we organize ourselves in terms of teaching centres ‘faculty’ and supervisors and yet be one program? This is going to be challenging for us. If we are using the same curriculum then multiple sites is fine. We have high standards for supervisors and learning process. But gap in terms of how we come together as a faculty and do regular reviews and how adjustments are done plus integration of feedback from students This is a change of culture in Ontario - to see ourselves as a single faculty - this is foreign to our imaginations in our way of seeing one another. If we are a faculty what impact is this on accrediting teaching centres? The biggest piece is that we need a common curriculum and a common faculty Suggestion - At Workshop at CASC on curriculum - add in conversation about engagement and CRPO working groups Engagement Group - spent time to clarify purpose of their group lead the “to communication… and to facilitate dialogue”. We have 57 supervisors in Ontario (provisional, associate, teaching levels) with 49 in CPE and 8 PCE 25 teaching centres in Ontario (need to verify the centres) Asking ourselves - Who are our partners and relationships do we need to nurture, particularly APTI. APTI is about education and not practice. Looking at how to engage the colleges and universities. All centres have an academic affiliation. Can we use their existing relationships to build partnerships? Will be in contact with the Ontario Multi-faith council Work Plan for CASC ON ESC Propose that each working group develop a work plan that would become a composite work plan which Neil can present at Feb meeting and at national group meeting in April. We want to engage members across the country and need to consider how information is rolled out so that there is a good progression of the dialogue and to ensure we have buy in from supervisors nationally Essential elements of template would include - goals and time frame - project management (goals/ resources/budget/ lead for goal/ what is hoped to do when Neil can consult with project management people for a template. Others are welcome to also find a template - by this time next week lets have tool in place and then groups can populate the template so that this is ready for our March meeting. We can take this to the educational standards committee at national level in April.
Idea of being a ‘faculty’ - how can we organize ourselves in terms of teaching centres and supervisors and yet be one program? This is going to be challenging for us. If we are using the same curriculum then multiple sites is fine. We have high standards for supervisors and learning process. But gap in terms of how we come together as a faculty and do regular reviews and how adjustments are done plus integration of feedback from students This is a change of culture in Ontario - to see ourselves as a single faculty - this is foreign to our imaginations in our way of seeing one another. If we are a faculty what impact is this on accrediting teaching centres? The biggest piece is that we need a common curriculum and a common faculty Suggestion - At Workshop at CASC on curriculum - add in conversation about engagement and CRPO working groups Engagement Group - spent time to clarify purpose of their group “to lead the communication… and to facilitate dialogue”. We have 57 supervisors in Ontario (provisional, associate, teaching levels) with 49 in CPE and 8 PCE 25 teaching centres in Ontario (need to verify the centres) Asking ourselves - Who are our partners and relationships do we need to nurture, particularly APTI. APTI is about education and not practice. Looking at how to engage the colleges and universities. All centres have an academic affiliation. Can we use their existing relationships to build partnerships? Will be in contact with the Ontario Multi-faith council Work Plan for CASC ON ESC Propose that each working group develop a work plan that would become a composite work plan which Neil can present at Feb meeting and at national group meeting in April. We want to engage members across the country and need to consider how information is rolled out so that there is a good progression of the dialogue and to ensure we have buy in from supervisors nationally Essential elements of template would include - goals and time frame - project management (goals/ resources/budget/ lead for goal/ what is hoped to do when Neil can consult with project management people for a template. Others are welcome to also find a template - by this time next week lets have tool in place and then groups can populate the template so that this is ready for our March meeting. We can take this to the educational standards committee at national level in April.