education support. SE 24 Please submit PI Student A review of student Please conduct training for all IEP Notice of evidence of training Records records revealed that the Team chairpersons on the need to School held for IEP Team district routinely issues a clearly identify the assessments being District’s chairpersons. Please Staff notice of the school proposed to address the student’s area Proposal or include the agenda, Interviews district proposal or refusal of suspected disability. Refusal to act materials and to act that addresses the attendance sheet elements required by Please develop a tracking system that (with the name and federal regulations. includes supervisory oversight and role of staff). periodic review to ensure that the However, student records proposal to conduct an evaluation and Please provide a identified that the seek consent specifies the assessments description on the district’s evaluation designed to address the student’s area internal tracking consent forms do not of suspected disability system, including always specify the the personnel assessments selected to Please select a sample of 15 records for responsible for address the student’s area initial evaluations or revaluations supervisory of suspected disability. conducted after the district completed oversight. The evaluation proposed all of its corrective actions. Please often includes a ensure that the sample is representative “Special This progress report Education Evaluation” of the elementary, middle, and high is due on which staff interviews and school levels. Please review the September 28, students records verified records to ensure that the district’s 2012. is synonymous with a proposed evaluation consent form standardized achievement clearly articulates the assessments Please submit a assessment. intended to assess the student’s area of narrative description suspected disability. of the results of the internal monitoring conducted. Please include the numbers
education support. SE 24 Notice of School District’s Proposal or Refusal to act PI Student Records Staff Interviews A review of student records revealed that the district routinely issues a notice of the school district proposal or refusal to act that addresses the elements required by federal regulations. However, student records identified that the district’s evaluation consent forms do not always specify the assessments selected to address the student’s area of suspected disability. The evaluation proposed often includes a “Special Education Evaluation” which staff interviews and students records verified is synonymous with a standardized achievement assessment. Please conduct training for all IEP Team chairpersons on the need to clearly identify the assessments being proposed to address the student’s area of suspected disability. Please develop a tracking system that includes supervisory oversight and periodic review to ensure that the proposal to conduct an evaluation and seek consent specifies the assessments designed to address the student’s area of suspected disability Please select a sample of 15 records for initial evaluations or revaluations conducted after the district completed all of its corrective actions. Please ensure that the sample is representative of the elementary, middle, and high school levels. Please review the records to ensure that the district’s proposed evaluation consent form clearly articulates the assessments intended to assess the student’s area of suspected disability. Please submit evidence of training held for IEP Team chairpersons. Please include the agenda, materials and attendance sheet (with the name and role of staff). Please provide a description on the internal tracking system, including the personnel responsible for supervisory oversight. This progress report is due on September 28, 2012. Please submit a narrative description of the results of the internal monitoring conducted. Please include the numbers