Innovate/Journal of to the first area of erythema to Medical Imaging and appear, which was not always Radiation Sciences the worst affected area 44 (2013) 44-58 overall. Silicone -based Mepilex®Lite Randomised controlled Zhong, WH., Tang, Radiation-induced dermatitis 0 foam trial comparing the QF., Hu, LY., Feng, in the Mepilex® Lite Low adhesion effectiveness of Mepilex® HX. 2013. Mepilex® healed significantly more Lite dressings and usual Lite dressings for quickly than in the control care (described as wound managing acute group (median 16 days vs. 23 care and cleansing with dermatitis in days, p=0.009). Although on normal saline) in patients nasopharyngeal multivariate analysis, dressing undergoing carcinoma patients: a type was no longer a radiation for systematic controlled significant determinant of time nasopharyngeal clinical trial. Medical to wound healing. Sleep, pain carcinoma. Oncology 30: (4), 761. and combined average N = 88 researcher and Outcome: Time to RISRAS scores were healing; RISRAS, wound significantly better in the pain, restriction of neck Mepilex®Lite group. movement, sleep and body image disturbance. Limitations: as with other studies, this was not blinded. It was not entirely clear at what point the dressings were first applied. Hydrophilic PolyMem® Case studies of Scott, A. 2014. Pain and sleep scores Not able to Polyurethane PolyMem® in patients with Polymeric membrane improved during the score Foam erythematous radiation dressings for radiotherapy treatment course Non-adhesive skin reactions (RTOG >1) radiotherapy-induced after PolyMem® dressings undergoing RT for head skin damage Br J had been applied. Skin had and neck cancer Nurs(Oncology healed within a week in 8 N = 20 patients, and within 3 weeks
Innovate/Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences 44 (2013) 44-58 to the first area of erythema to appear, which was not always the worst affected area overall. Silicone -based foam Low adhesion Mepilex®Lite Randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of Mepilex® Lite dressings and usual care (described as wound care and cleansing with normal saline) in patients undergoing for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N = 88 Outcome: Time to healing; RISRAS, wound pain, restriction of neck movement, sleep and body image disturbance. Zhong, WH., Tang, QF., Hu, LY., Feng, HX. 2013. Mepilex® Lite dressings for managing acute radiation dermatitis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic controlled clinical trial. Medical Oncology 30: (4), 761. Radiation-induced dermatitis in the Mepilex® Lite healed significantly more quickly than in the control group (median 16 days vs. 23 days, p=0.009). Although on multivariate analysis, dressing type was no longer a significant determinant of time to wound healing. Sleep, pain and combined average researcher and RISRAS scores were significantly better in the Mepilex®Lite group. Limitations: as with other studies, this was not blinded. It was not entirely clear at what point the dressings were first applied. 0 Hydrophilic Polyurethane Foam Non-adhesive PolyMem® Case studies of PolyMem® in patients with erythematous radiation skin reactions (RTOG >1) undergoing RT for head and neck cancer N = 20 Scott, A. 2014. Polymeric membrane dressings for radiotherapy-induced skin damage Br J Nurs(Oncology Pain and sleep scores improved during the radiotherapy treatment course after PolyMem® dressings had been applied. Skin had healed within a week in 8 patients, and within 3 weeks Not able to score