References and/or Correct citation of the process of supporting material references and literature analysis is clear, with generally accurate. used. good structure, and Meets the criteria and Structured and clear meets all module requirements of the presentation. outcomes. module assessment. Meets relevant module Meets relevant module learning outcomes. learning outcomes. Does not fully meet the Does not meet the The module outcomes Achieved criteria and requirements criteria and requirements are evidenced but the 40-49% but of the module of the module analysis of concepts is not at a assessment. assessment. flawed. An adequate to allow MCA Does not meet module Does not meet module of core certification specific criteria or specific criteria or relevant navigational in level 4 and relevant learning learning outcomes. knowledge is in 5. outcomes. Limited evidence of evidence, but Limited range of relevant reading, below average development of theory. knowledge of original thought and Errors in referencing. underpinning knowledge. critique is average. Structure lacking in Poor application of References should be logical continuity and underpinning knowledge. appropriate and up to structure. Overly descriptive in date. Structure of the analysis and lacking in work is adequate. critical analysis. Failure Unreferenced or no Limited and inaccurate Lack of knowledge to achieve. supporting material. referencing and or base with which to Less than Lacking in theoretical supporting materials. inform independent 40% content. Lack of understanding of thought. Poorly organised key issues relating to Poor critique. Lack of, presentation. underpinning knowledge. or inappropriate, Difficult to read and referencing. Poor follow. structure.
References and/or supporting material generally accurate. Meets the criteria and requirements of the module assessment. Meets relevant module learning outcomes. Correct citation of references and literature used. Structured and clear presentation. Meets relevant module learning outcomes. the process of analysis is clear, with good structure, and meets all module outcomes. Achieved 40-49% but not at a to allow MCA certification in level 4 and 5. Does not fully meet the criteria and requirements of the module assessment. Does not meet module specific criteria or relevant learning outcomes. Limited range of relevant theory. Errors in referencing. Structure lacking in logical continuity and structure. Does not meet the criteria and requirements of the module assessment. Does not meet module specific criteria or relevant learning outcomes. Limited evidence of reading, below average knowledge of underpinning knowledge. Poor application of underpinning knowledge. Overly descriptive in analysis and lacking in critical analysis. The module outcomes are evidenced but the analysis of concepts is flawed. An adequate of core navigational knowledge is in evidence, but development of original thought and critique is average. References should be appropriate and up to date. Structure of the work is adequate. Failure to achieve. Less than 40% Unreferenced or no supporting material. Lacking in theoretical content. Poorly organised presentation. Difficult to read and follow. Limited and inaccurate referencing and or supporting materials. Lack of understanding of key issues relating to underpinning knowledge. Lack of knowledge base with which to inform independent thought. Poor critique. Lack of, or inappropriate, referencing. Poor structure.