permissible 84.1% Footbridge actor Count 18 5 21 % 40.9% 11.40% 47.7% permissible 59.1% Footbridge observer Count 10 1 32 % 23.3% 2.3% 74.4% permissible 76.7% Table 5: Regression models of rightness judgments in the second task with dummy variables for actor/ observer (observer = 1, actor = 0), side-track/ footbridge (footbridge = 1, side-track = 0), and whether the participant took the action/ said that the actor should take the action (yes = 1, no = 0), male/ female (male = 1, female = 0). Standard errors in brackets beneath each coefficient parameter 1 Model 2 Model 3 4 Model 5 Constant 2.87*** 2.80*** 3.47*** 3.23*** 2.27** (0.56) (0.58) (0.74) (0.86) (1.00) Observer 1.63*** 1.76*** 0.45 1.62*** 1.63*** (0.29) (0.41) (1.01) (0.29) (0.29) Footbridge 0.16 0.28 0.14 -0.39 0.13 (0.29) (0.40) (0.29) (1.06) (0.29) TakeAction 2.72*** 2.73*** 2.08*** 2.35*** 2.73*** (0.53) (0.53) (0.75) (0.87) (0.53) Observer*footbridge -0.26 (0.57) Observer*action 1.28
permissible 84.1% Footbridge actor Count 18 5 21 % 40.9% 11.40% 47.7% permissible 59.1% Footbridge observer Count 10 1 32 % 23.3% 2.3% 74.4% permissible 76.7% Table 5: Regression models of rightness judgments in the second task with dummy variables for actor/ observer (observer = 1, actor = 0), side-track/ footbridge (footbridge = 1, side-track = 0), and whether the participant took the action/ said that the actor should take the action (yes = 1, no = 0), male/ female (male = 1, female = 0). Standard errors in brackets beneath each coefficient parameter 1 Model 2 Model 3 4 Model 5 Constant 2.87*** (0.56) 2.80*** (0.58) 3.47*** (0.74) 3.23*** (0.86) 2.27** (1.00) Observer 1.63*** (0.29) 1.76*** (0.41) 0.45 (1.01) 1.62*** (0.29) 1.63*** (0.29) Footbridge 0.16 (0.29) 0.28 (0.40) 0.14 (0.29) -0.39 (1.06) 0.13 (0.29) TakeAction 2.72*** (0.53) 2.73*** (0.53) 2.08*** (0.75) 2.35*** (0.87) 2.73*** (0.53) Observer*footbridge -0.26 (0.57) Observer*action 1.28