ANNEX A: PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK Indicators Baseline End of Project Target Source/Means of Risks and Assumptions verification COMPONENT 1: STRENGTHENING POLICY, INSTITUTIONAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR BIOSAFETY Outcome 1.1: Number of Gaps still remain in At least 5 implementation examples Government Risks Enhanced implementation existing regulatory with enhanced framework of notifications Delay in approval or rejection of capacity to examples and institutional evaluation, management and regarding Biosafety legal documents by the develop, (evaluation, frameworks to monitoring of LMOs; Act, regulations and Parliament; implement and management and implement the other national At least 3 laws enforced by the Lack of active involvement of coordinate monitoring of LMOs) National Biosafety documents; enhanced mechanism (including Act, concerned ministries and decision biosafety in the National Framework (NBF); Master plan, support regulations); Implementation makers for the establishment of legislations and Biosafety Framework records; biosafety policy framework; regulations that is in compliance Capacity for sound with the CPB; decision-making Policy assessment Assumption processes and law report; Government strengthened capacity enforcement limited; for the inter-ministerial Capacity Number of laws coordination as well as policy development survey enforced by the implementation under the of committee enhanced high-level regulatory framework; members (e.g. before/ inter-ministerial after training survey, coordination Presence of an institutional mechanism; framework with concerned (KAP) ministries to implement biosafety survey, Most policy with smooth coordination; Significant Change (MSC) survey);
ANNEX A: PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK Indicators Baseline End of Project Target Source/Means of verification Risks and Assumptions COMPONENT 1: STRENGTHENING POLICY, INSTITUTIONAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR BIOSAFETY Outcome 1.1: Enhanced capacity to develop, implement and coordinate biosafety legislations and regulations Number of implementation examples (evaluation, management and monitoring of LMOs) in the National Biosafety Framework that is in compliance with the CPB; Number of laws enforced by the enhanced high-level inter-ministerial coordination mechanism; Gaps still remain in existing regulatory and institutional frameworks to implement the National Biosafety Framework (NBF); Capacity for sound decision-making processes and law enforcement limited; At least 5 implementation examples with enhanced framework of evaluation, management and monitoring of LMOs; At least 3 laws enforced by the enhanced mechanism (including Act, Master plan, support regulations); Government notifications regarding Biosafety Act, regulations and other national documents; Implementation records; Policy assessment report; Capacity development survey of committee members (e.g. before/ after training survey, (KAP) survey, Most Significant Change (MSC) survey); Risks Delay in approval or rejection of legal documents by the Parliament; Lack of active involvement of concerned ministries and decision makers for the establishment of biosafety policy framework; Assumption Government strengthened capacity for the inter-ministerial coordination as well as policy implementation under the regulatory framework; Presence of an institutional framework with concerned ministries to implement biosafety policy with smooth coordination;