Appendix B: 2016–17 statewide educator evaluation data The public reporting of aggregated educator evaluation ratings is an essential mechanism for DESE to assess the implementation of the Educator Evaluation Framework at a statewide level. Public reporting of educator evaluation data is established by statute () to enable DESE to assess the effectiveness of educator evaluation implementation statewide. DESE strives to ensure that schools and districts have robust educator evaluation systems in place that promote professional learning and growth as a means to close gaps in equitable access. 3 includes aggregated educator evaluation data for the 2016–17 school year. This data should not be considered as comparative across districts, but rather as evidence of robust educator effectiveness systems functioning in districts. While viewing local educator evaluation data, districts should consider how to use the data to inform strategies to address local equity gaps, and to pursue other district priorities. 3: Rates of educator evaluation and summative ratings % of Summative Rating # of educators # of educators educators Needs evaluated Exemplary Proficient Unsatisfactory evaluated Improvement All teachers & 86,629 81,639 94.2% 83.6% 3.4% 0.3% administrators 12.7% All 6,579 5,736 87.2% 18.6% 78.6% 2.6% 0.2% administrators 71,375 68,178 95.5% 11.8% 84.2% 3.6% 0.3% All teachers Teachers without 18,036 16,555 91.8% 4.8% 85.3% 9.5% 0.5% Professional Teacher Status Teachers with 52,173 50,499 96.8% 14.1% 84.1% 1.5% 0.2% Professional Teacher Status
Appendix B: 2016–17 statewide educator evaluation data The public reporting of aggregated educator evaluation ratings is an essential mechanism for DESE to assess the implementation of the Educator Evaluation Framework at a statewide level. Public reporting of educator evaluation data is established by statute () to enable DESE to assess the effectiveness of educator evaluation implementation statewide. DESE strives to ensure that schools and districts have robust educator evaluation systems in place that promote professional learning and growth as a means to close gaps in equitable access. 3 includes aggregated educator evaluation data for the 2016–17 school year. This data should not be considered as comparative across districts, but rather as evidence of robust educator effectiveness systems functioning in districts. While viewing local educator evaluation data, districts should consider how to use the data to inform strategies to address local equity gaps, and to pursue other district priorities. 3: Rates of educator evaluation and summative ratings # of educators # of educators evaluated % of educators evaluated Summative Rating Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory All teachers & administrators 86,629 81,639 94.2% 12.7% 83.6% 3.4% 0.3% All administrators 6,579 5,736 87.2% 18.6% 78.6% 2.6% 0.2% All teachers 71,375 68,178 95.5% 11.8% 84.2% 3.6% 0.3% Teachers without Professional Teacher Status 18,036 16,555 91.8% 4.8% 85.3% 9.5% 0.5% Teachers with Professional Teacher Status 52,173 50,499 96.8% 14.1% 84.1% 1.5% 0.2%