Evaluation Form 1. Background and Rationale Research background is unclear, statements for background or Background and rational is clearly statements for the rational. rational. stated. 2. Objectives and Methodology Missing or not related. Fails to Objectives relevant to the project Specifically shows qualitative and address the innovation of the with limited innovation. quantitative measures. Describe project. how the project is innovative. Fails to address methods or methods Describes feasible activities, Provides a detailed are not feasible. Vague testing methods, and analysis techniques. description of design and outcomes. Does not acknowledge Acknowledges limitations. approach. Methods and limitations. analysis well explained. 3. Results and summary Unclear results or summary, Suitable statement for the result and Well-organized results and clearly logically flawed. summary stated summary, logically flawless, concise statement. 4. Oral Presentation Expression is not fluent. Poor Clear expression, suitable voice and Fluent expression. Natural transition and body language. No tone. Appropriate time transition and body language. Vivid variety. Poor time management. presentation. Good time management. management. 5. Power Point Appearance Poorly designed PPT slides, e.g., Appropriately designed PPT slides Well-designed PPT slides with improper font size and typos, with acceptable appearance. comfortable appearance and grammatical mistakes. professional layouts. score (maximum 30 points):
Evaluation Form 1. Background and Rationale Research background is unclear, statements for the rational. statements for background or rational. Background and rational is clearly stated. 2. Objectives and Methodology Missing or not related. Fails to address the innovation of the project. Objectives relevant to the project with limited innovation. Specifically shows qualitative and quantitative measures. Describe how the project is innovative. Fails to address methods or methods are not feasible. Vague testing outcomes. Does not acknowledge limitations. Describes feasible activities, methods, and analysis techniques. Acknowledges limitations. Provides a detailed description of design and approach. Methods and analysis well explained. 3. Results and summary Unclear results or summary, logically flawed. Suitable statement for the result and summary Well-organized results and clearly stated summary, logically flawless, concise statement. 4. Oral Presentation Expression is not fluent. Poor transition and body language. No variety. Poor time management. Clear expression, suitable voice and tone. Appropriate time management. Fluent expression. Natural transition and body language. Vivid presentation. Good time management. 5. Power Point Appearance Poorly designed PPT slides, e.g., improper font size and typos, grammatical mistakes. Appropriately designed PPT slides with acceptable appearance. Well-designed PPT slides with comfortable appearance and professional layouts. score (maximum 30 points):