Demonstrate and Dynamics of Race and M = 4.67 M = 4.6 4, 41 Benchmark met apply a professional Discrimination 100% 100% M = 4.09 understanding of personal and Cultural awareness 97% societal values in ethical 95% decision-making with individuals, families and groups. 2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform communicate professional judgements Demonstrate an Psychopathology M = 4.29 M = 4.2 5, 42, 45 Benchmark met understanding of and an Final paper 97.1% 100% M = 4.01 ability to critically analyze a 74% 97.1% variety of theories and practice approaches in bringing about therapeutic change in individuals, families and small groups Communicate Advanced Practice with M = 4.58 M = 4.4 7, 43 Benchmark met Small Systems I 100% 100% M = 4.16 orally and in writing when Therapeutic intervention 96% working with client systems project and complete documentation 95% effectively; Draw upon a Program Evaluation M = 4.47 M = 4.4 6, 44, 46 Benchmark met Literature review 100% 100% M = 4.24 variety of sources to obtain 95% 97.7% knowledge and skills based upon scientific inquiry. 2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice
Demonstrate and apply a professional understanding of personal and societal values in ethical decision-making with individuals, families and groups. Dynamics of Race and Discrimination Cultural awareness 95% M = 4.67 100% M = 4.6 100% 4, 41 M = 4.09 97% Benchmark met 2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform communicate professional judgements Demonstrate an understanding of and an ability to critically analyze a variety of theories and practice approaches in bringing about therapeutic change in individuals, families and small groups Psychopathology Final paper 74% M = 4.29 97.1% M = 4.2 100% 5, 42, 45 M = 4.01 97.1% Benchmark met Communicate orally and in writing when working with client systems and complete documentation effectively; Advanced Practice with Small Systems I Therapeutic intervention project 95% M = 4.58 100% M = 4.4 100% 7, 43 M = 4.16 96% Benchmark met Draw upon a variety of sources to obtain knowledge and skills based upon scientific inquiry. Program Evaluation Literature review 95% M = 4.47 100% M = 4.4 100% 6, 44, 46 M = 4.24 97.7% Benchmark met 2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice