shall be determined considering the following three sub-criteria and relevant percentage weights: 1) General qualifications (general education, training, and experience): [insert weight between 10 and 20 %] 2) Adequacy for the Assignment (relevant education, training, experience in the sector/similar assignments ) : [insert weight between 60 and 80%] Relevant experience relevant to the task, add the 3d sub-criterion: in the region (working level fluency in local language(s)/knowledge of local culture or administrative system, government organization, etc.): [insert weight between 0 and 10 %] Total weight: 100% (iv) Transfer of knowledge (training) program (relevance of approach and methodology): [normally, not to exceed 10 points] Total points for criterion (iv): [0 10] – (v) Participation by nationals among proposed Key Experts [0 10] – [not to exceed 10 points] [Sub-criteria shall not be provided. Calculated as a ratio of the national Key time-input (in Experts’ person-months) to the total number of Key time-input (in Experts’ person-months) in the Technical Proposal] Consultant’s Total points for the five criteria: 100 The minimum technical score (St) required to pass is: [insert number] [The indicative range is 70 to 85 on a scale of 1 to 100] 21.1 Criteria, sub-criteria, and point system for the evaluation of the Simplified [for STP] Technical Proposals are: Points (i) Adequacy and quality of the proposed methodology, and work plan in responding to the Terms of Reference: Total points for criterion (i): [20 - 40] (ii) Key qualifications and competence for the Assignment: Experts’ {Notes to Consultant: each position number corresponds to the same for Key Experts in Form TECH-6 to be prepared by the Consultant} a) Position K-1: [Team Leader] [Insert points]
shall be determined considering the following three sub-criteria and relevant percentage weights: 1) General qualifications (general education, training, and experience): [insert weight between 10 and 20 %] 2) Adequacy for the Assignment (relevant education, training, experience in the sector/similar assignments ) : [insert weight between 60 and 80%] relevant to the task, add the 3d sub-criterion: Relevant experience in the region (working level fluency in local language(s)/knowledge of local culture or administrative system, government organization, etc.): [insert weight between 0 and 10 %] Total weight: 100% (iv) Transfer of knowledge (training) program (relevance of approach and methodology): [normally, not to exceed 10 points] Total points for criterion (iv): [0 – 10] (v) Participation by nationals among proposed Key Experts [0 – 10] [not to exceed 10 points] [Sub-criteria shall not be provided. Calculated as a ratio of the national Key Experts’ time-input (in person-months) to the total number of Key Experts’ time-input (in person-months) in the Consultant’s Technical Proposal] Total points for the five criteria: 100 The minimum technical score (St) required to pass is: [insert number] [The indicative range is 70 to 85 on a scale of 1 to 100] 21.1 [for STP] Criteria, sub-criteria, and point system for the evaluation of the Simplified Technical Proposals are: Points (i) Adequacy and quality of the proposed methodology, and work plan in responding to the Terms of Reference: Total points for criterion (i): [20 - 40] (ii) Key Experts’ qualifications and competence for the Assignment: {Notes to Consultant: each position number corresponds to the same for Key Experts in Form TECH-6 to be prepared by the Consultant} a) Position K-1: [Team Leader] [Insert points]