Possible decisions: continue with intervention with current goal, continue with the goal increased, teach self-management strategies, or fade intervention components IEP Response Actions & Next Student Grade Supporting Data Fade or Graduate Who? By When? (Y/N) Steps 4 weeks of making Meets criteria to -Train student Mr. King 10/7 Ty Davis goal at 80%, mentor fade to Phase 2 of -Refresh all teachers Mr. King 10/7 6 N reported behavior CICO -Positive Phone call home Mrs. Rose 10/7 has improved -Update Graph Ms. Monroe 10/7 New Referrals To Tier II Team Possible sources: ODR data, teacher nomination, attendance, academic progress, screening tools IEP Referral Source & Relevant Response Actions & Next Student Grade Teacher Who? By When? (Y/N) Information Steps Nomination Form – disruption, parent contact Student meets criteria ODR- 2 Shelby Mr. for CICO, Mr. King will 6 N SRSS – moderate risk Mr. King 10/7 Morris Kennedy start process of externalizing enrollment in CICO Absences – 0 Tardy - 6 Evaluation of Team Meeting (Mark your ratings with an “X”) Our Rating Yes So-So No 1. Was today’s meeting a good use of our time? X 2. In general, did we do a good job of tracking whether we’re completing the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings? X 3. In general, have we done a good job of actually completing the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings? X 4. In general, are the completed tasks having the desired effects on student behavior? X
Possible decisions: continue with intervention with current goal, continue with the goal increased, teach self-management strategies, or fade intervention components Student Grade IEP (Y/N) Supporting Data Fade or Graduate Response Actions & Next Steps Who? By When? Ty Davis 6 N 4 weeks of making goal at 80%, mentor reported behavior has improved Meets criteria to fade to Phase 2 of CICO -Train student -Refresh all teachers -Positive Phone call home -Update Graph Mr. King Mr. King Mrs. Rose Ms. Monroe 10/7 10/7 10/7 10/7 New Referrals To Tier II Team Possible sources: ODR data, teacher nomination, attendance, academic progress, screening tools Student Grade IEP (Y/N) Teacher Referral Source & Relevant Information Response Actions & Next Steps Who? By When? Shelby Morris 6 N Mr. Kennedy Nomination Form – disruption, parent contact ODR- 2 SRSS – moderate risk externalizing Absences – 0 Tardy - 6 Student meets criteria for CICO, Mr. King will start process of enrollment in CICO Mr. King 10/7 Evaluation of Team Meeting (Mark your ratings with an “X”) Our Rating Yes So-So No 1. Was today’s meeting a good use of our time? X 2. In general, did we do a good job of tracking whether we’re completing the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings? X 3. In general, have we done a good job of actually completing the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings? X 4. In general, are the completed tasks having the desired effects on student behavior? X