*Benefit of NEF: if successful, makes K void, so if 3rd party is involved, detrimental impact on them or D no barrier (vs doctrines that K like duress, illegality; if resc would affect 3rd be granted) don’t void neg’ly P, won’t *It is consideration given by promisee that makes prom not gratuitous, s/t K law interested in enforcing promisor’s
*Benefit of NEF: if successful, makes K void, so if 3rd party is involved, detrimental impact on them or D no barrier (vs doctrines that don’t void K like duress, illegality; if resc would neg’ly affect 3rd P, won’t be granted) *It is consideration given by promisee that makes promisor’s prom not gratuitous, s/t K law interested in enforcing