at least one combined programmatic monitoring visit and were monitoring/evaluation site visit. monitoring/evaluation site visit functioning responsibly. during the year with any issues of 2004-2005 - 100% (14 of 14) noncompliance to be resolved received at least one within 60 days. monitoring visit and were functioning responsibly. 2005-2006 - 100% (16 of 16) received at least one monitoring visit and were functioning responsibly. 2006-2007 - 100% (16 of 16) Three issues on noncompliance were addressed with 2 activities. All were addressed and appropriately resolved within 60 days. 2007-2008 -100% (16 of 16) No issues of noncompliance were found. 2008-2009 - 100% (15 of 15) No issues of noncompliance were found. 2009-2010 - 100% (13 of 13) of programs have been monitored (Subsidy is not required to be monitored) and no issues of noncompliance were found. 2010-2011 100% (13 of 13) – 2011-2012 92% (11 of 12) – By June 30, 2013, 100% (13 of 13) 2007-2008- 100% (16 of 16) 100% (11 of 11) of activities were monitored of funded activities will be were monitored with technical and 82% (9 of 11) achieved at least 66% of monitored with technical assistance assistance provided as needed their measurable outcomes. provided as needed and 77% (10 of and 73% (11 of 15) met at 13) will achieve at least 66% of their least 66% of their measurable established measurable outcomes, as outcomes measured by at least one monitoring 2008-2009 - 100% (15 of 15) visit per program and Quarterly have been monitored and 85% Reports. (11 of 13) achieved at least 66% of their outcomes. (CREST and Professional Development were not included in the outcome data due to ending early in the year.) 2009-2010 -100% (13 of 13) of programs have been monitored (Subsidy is not required to be monitored) and 62% (8 of 13) of activities met at least 66% of their outcomes 2010-2011 - 100% (13 of 13) of funded activities have been monitored and 77% (10 of 13)
at least one combined programmatic monitoring/evaluation site visit during the year with any issues of noncompliance to be resolved within 60 days. monitoring visit and were functioning responsibly. 2004-2005 - 100% (14 of 14) received at least one monitoring visit and were functioning responsibly. 2005-2006 - 100% (16 of 16) received at least one monitoring visit and were functioning responsibly. 2006-2007 - 100% (16 of 16) Three issues on noncompliance were addressed with 2 activities. All were addressed and appropriately resolved within 60 days. 2007-2008 -100% (16 of 16) No issues of noncompliance were found. 2008-2009 - 100% (15 of 15) No issues of noncompliance were found. 2009-2010 - 100% (13 of 13) of programs have been monitored (Subsidy is not required to be monitored) and no issues of noncompliance were found. 2010-2011 – 100% (13 of 13) 2011-2012 – 92% (11 of 12) monitoring/evaluation site visit. By June 30, 2013, 100% (13 of 13) of funded activities will be monitored with technical assistance provided as needed and 77% (10 of 13) will achieve at least 66% of their established measurable outcomes, as measured by at least one monitoring visit per program and Quarterly Reports. 2007-2008- 100% (16 of 16) were monitored with technical assistance provided as needed and 73% (11 of 15) met at least 66% of their measurable outcomes 2008-2009 - 100% (15 of 15) have been monitored and 85% (11 of 13) achieved at least 66% of their outcomes. (CREST and Professional Development were not included in the outcome data due to ending early in the year.) 2009-2010 -100% (13 of 13) of programs have been monitored (Subsidy is not required to be monitored) and 62% (8 of 13) of activities met at least 66% of their outcomes 2010-2011 - 100% (13 of 13) of funded activities have been monitored and 77% (10 of 13) 100% (11 of 11) of activities were monitored and 82% (9 of 11) achieved at least 66% of their measurable outcomes.