kW = Gross customer connected load kW savings for the measure Table 243: ENERGY STAR Lighting - References Component Type Value Sources CFLwatts Fixed Variable Data Gathering CFLhours Fixed 1.9 6 ISRCFL Fixed 84% 3 Torchwatts Fixed 115.8 1 Torchhours Fixed 3.0 2 ISRTorch Fixed 83% 3 IFwatts Fixed 48.7 1 IFhours Fixed 2.6 2 ISRIF Fixed 95% 3 OFwatts Fixed 94.7 1 OFhours Fixed 4.5 2 ISROF Fixed 87% 3 CF Fixed 5% 4 kWh Fixed 180 kWh 5 kW Fixed 0.01968 5 Sources: Nexus Market Evaluation of the Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Research, “Impact Vermont 2003 Residential Lighting October 1, 2004, p. 43 Programs”, Final Report, (Table 4-9) Ibid., p. 104 (Table 9-7). This table adjusts for differences between logged sample and the much larger telephone survey sample and should, therefore, have less bias. Ibid., p. 42 (Table 4-7). These values reflect both actual installations and the % of units planned to be installed within a year from the logged sample. The logged % is used because the adjusted values (i.e to account for differences between logging and telephone survey samples) were not available for both installs and planned installs. However, this seems appropriate because the % actual installed in the logged sample from this table is essentially identical to the % after adjusting for differences between the logged group and the telephone sample (p. 100, Table 9-3). RLW of Common Demand Impacts for Energy Efficiency Analytics, “Development Measures/Programs for the ISO Forward Capacity Market prepared for the New (FCM)”, England State Program Working Group (SPWG), March 25, 2007, p. IV. Efficiency Vermont. Technical Reference User Manual: Measure Savings Algorithms and Cost Assumptions (July 2008).
kW = Gross customer connected load kW savings for the measure Table 243: ENERGY STAR Lighting - References Component Type Value Sources CFLwatts Fixed Variable Data Gathering CFLhours Fixed 1.9 6 ISRCFL Fixed 84% 3 Torchwatts Fixed 115.8 1 Torchhours Fixed 3.0 2 ISRTorch Fixed 83% 3 IFwatts Fixed 48.7 1 IFhours Fixed 2.6 2 ISRIF Fixed 95% 3 OFwatts Fixed 94.7 1 OFhours Fixed 4.5 2 ISROF Fixed 87% 3 CF Fixed 5% 4 kWh Fixed 180 kWh 5 kW Fixed 0.01968 5 Sources: Nexus Market Research, “Impact Evaluation of the Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Vermont 2003 Residential Lighting Programs”, Final Report, October 1, 2004, p. 43 (Table 4-9) Ibid., p. 104 (Table 9-7). This table adjusts for differences between logged sample and the much larger telephone survey sample and should, therefore, have less bias. Ibid., p. 42 (Table 4-7). These values reflect both actual installations and the % of units planned to be installed within a year from the logged sample. The logged % is used because the adjusted values (i.e to account for differences between logging and telephone survey samples) were not available for both installs and planned installs. However, this seems appropriate because the % actual installed in the logged sample from this table is essentially identical to the % after adjusting for differences between the logged group and the telephone sample (p. 100, Table 9-3). RLW Analytics, “Development of Common Demand Impacts for Energy Efficiency Measures/Programs for the ISO Forward Capacity Market (FCM)”, prepared for the New England State Program Working Group (SPWG), March 25, 2007, p. IV. Efficiency Vermont. Technical Reference User Manual: Measure Savings Algorithms and Cost Assumptions (July 2008).