Composition of the evaluation team Lack of fair treatment of in line with the project scope and suppliers complexities Failure to observe Inconsistency in evaluation of For high tech/highly complex effective evaluation offers procurement activities, ensure procedures Subjectivity in outcome of the technical expertise evaluations Ensure staff are suitably trained and experienced Ensure that specifications are Failure of offers to meet understandable, generic, and in line Need to re-tender project needs with what exists in the market Know the marketplace Failure of evaluation to identify a clear winner, Claims of unethical and unfair Ensure that selection criteria are leading to subjective behavior appropriate and aligned with the discussions or Need to re-tender project needs development of “new criteria” Reject offers from unacceptable suppliers and document rationale for Failure of the supplier to fulfill the rejection the contract Selection of inappropriate Develop clear evaluation criteria Waste of funds supplier aligned with the project needs Contract disputes Perform technical and financial Re-tendering (time/cost) checks on suppliers before awarding the contract Develop proper specifications/ Failure of goods/services to TOR/SOW Select inappropriate meet the project needs Have the right technical expertise goods/ service Waste of funds during the evaluation process Re-tendering (time/cost) Ensure users are involved Need to start the Develop strong understanding of procurement again market Insufficient number of Delays to procurement Foster international competition responses schedule Develop supplier rosters Lack of value for money due Allow for sufficient time for suppliers to limited competition to prepare offers Procurement Review and Award Proper procurement risk analysis Delay in the contract award Proper procurement strategies Contract approval not Need to re-bid (time/cost) (including sourcing strategies) obtained Undermine business Market understanding community trust Proper procurement planning
Failure to observe effective evaluation procedures Lack of fair treatment of suppliers Inconsistency in evaluation of offers Subjectivity in outcome of the evaluations Composition of the evaluation team in line with the project scope and complexities For high tech/highly complex procurement activities, ensure technical expertise Ensure staff are suitably trained and experienced Failure of offers to meet project needs Need to re-tender Ensure that specifications are understandable, generic, and in line with what exists in the market Know the marketplace Failure of evaluation to identify a clear winner, leading to subjective discussions or development of “new criteria” Claims of unethical and unfair behavior Need to re-tender Ensure that selection criteria are appropriate and aligned with the project needs Selection of inappropriate supplier Failure of the supplier to fulfill the contract Waste of funds Contract disputes Re-tendering (time/cost) Reject offers from unacceptable suppliers and document rationale for the rejection Develop clear evaluation criteria aligned with the project needs Perform technical and financial checks on suppliers before awarding the contract Select inappropriate goods/ service Failure of goods/services to meet the project needs Waste of funds Re-tendering (time/cost) Develop proper specifications/ TOR/SOW Have the right technical expertise during the evaluation process Ensure users are involved Insufficient number of responses Need to start the procurement again Delays to procurement schedule Lack of value for money due to limited competition Develop strong understanding of market Foster international competition Develop supplier rosters Allow for sufficient time for suppliers to prepare offers Procurement Review and Award Contract approval not obtained Delay in the contract award Need to re-bid (time/cost) Undermine business community trust Proper procurement risk analysis Proper procurement strategies (including sourcing strategies) Market understanding Proper procurement planning