and to normal, transient, and accident conditions to which the simulator has been designed to respond. 5 Simulator permitted use of the reference procedures so that Y/N the scenario was completed without procedural exceptions, simulator performance exceptions, or deviation from the scenario sequence. 6 Simulator did not fail to an expected alarm or automatic action Y/N and did not cause an unexpected alarm or automatic action. Note: Attach simulator alarm summary (versus time) to SBT Test Results record. 7 Observable change in simulated parameters corresponded in Y/N direction to those expected from actual or best estimate response of the reference plant. Note: Attach predetermined Monitored Parameter List (versus time) to SBT Test Results record. 8 Reference design limitations were not exceeded. Y/N 9 Each scenario malfunction demonstrated expected response to Y/N its initiating cause. 10 SBT conducted in a manner sufficient (i.e., meets requirements of Y/N ANSI/ANS-3.5-2009) to ensure that simulator fidelity has been demonstrated and met for this scenario. Note: Attach relevant marked-up plant procedures and or procedure portions/pages utilized to support assertion. 11 SBT documentation includes, at a minimum, the scenarios, Y/N procedures, data collected, and documentation used for initial license examinations, requalification examinations and reactivity manipulations. 12 Modeling and hardware discrepancies identified during the conduct Y/N of SBT are documented and entered in the site simulator Corrective Action Program (CAP). Note: Discrepancies that directly affect operator response (or action) or expected plant response must be resolved before the SBT test results can be judged as satisfactory. 13 Simulator SBT performance test results: Y/N ___ SATISFACTORY / ___ UNSATISFACTORY Note: Attach list of SBT test personnel (include name, job title, and level of effort). Technical comments attached: Y/N
and to normal, transient, and accident conditions to which the simulator has been designed to respond. 5 Simulator permitted use of the reference procedures so that the scenario was completed without procedural exceptions, simulator performance exceptions, or deviation from the scenario sequence. Y/N 6 Simulator did not fail to an expected alarm or automatic action and did not cause an unexpected alarm or automatic action. Note: Attach simulator alarm summary (versus time) to SBT Test Results record. Y/N 7 Observable change in simulated parameters corresponded in direction to those expected from actual or best estimate response of the reference plant. Note: Attach predetermined Monitored Parameter List (versus time) to SBT Test Results record. Y/N 8 Reference design limitations were not exceeded. Y/N 9 Each scenario malfunction demonstrated expected response to its initiating cause. Y/N 10 SBT conducted in a manner sufficient (i.e., meets requirements of ANSI/ANS-3.5-2009) to ensure that simulator fidelity has been demonstrated and met for this scenario. Note: Attach relevant marked-up plant procedures and or procedure portions/pages utilized to support assertion. Y/N 11 SBT documentation includes, at a minimum, the scenarios, procedures, data collected, and documentation used for initial license examinations, requalification examinations and reactivity manipulations. Y/N 12 Modeling and hardware discrepancies identified during the conduct of SBT are documented and entered in the site simulator Corrective Action Program (CAP). Note: Discrepancies that directly affect operator response (or action) or expected plant response must be resolved before the SBT test results can be judged as satisfactory. Y/N 13 Simulator SBT performance test results: ___ SATISFACTORY / ___ UNSATISFACTORY Note: Attach list of SBT test personnel (include name, job title, and level of effort). Y/N Technical comments attached: Y/N