(i) The Special IFR Recommendation has been approved by the vote of (A) a supermajority of the ccNSO Council and (B) a GNSO Supermajority. ARTICLE 19 IANA NAMING No recommended action, No new procedures or Assumptions: FUNCTION SEPARATION noting that GNSO changes to the GNSO In those instances where PROCESS Supermajority is defined in Operating Procedures there is a reference to SECTION 19.1 Bylaws: and/or ICANN Bylaws GNSO Supermajority, ESTABLISHING AN SCWG “ (A) two-thirds (2/3) of the there is no need to add (b) The Board shall Council members of each the voting threshold to establish an SCWG if each House, or (B) three-fourths section 11.3 as a GNSO of the following occurs: (3/4) of the Council Supermajority is already a (ii) The SCWG Creation members of one House and defined term. Recommendation has a majority of the Council been approved by the vote members of the other of (A) a supermajority of House.” the ccNSO Council … and (B) a GNSO Supermajority; SECTION 19.4 SCWG No recommended action, No new procedures or Assumptions: RECOMMENDATIONS noting that GNSO changes to the GNSO In those instances where (b) ICANN shall not Supermajority is defined in Operating Procedures there is a reference to implement an SCWG Bylaws: and/or ICANN Bylaws GNSO Supermajority, recommendation “ (A) two-thirds (2/3) of the there is no need to add (including an SCWG Council members of each the voting threshold to recommendation to issue House, or (B) three-fourths section 11.3 as a GNSO an IANA Naming Function (3/4) of the Council Supermajority is already a RFP) unless, with respect members of one House and defined term. to each such a majority of the Council recommendation (each, an members of the other “SCWG House.” Recommendation”), each of the following occurs: (i) The SCWG
(i) The Special IFR Recommendation has been approved by the vote of (A) a supermajority of the ccNSO Council and (B) a GNSO Supermajority. ARTICLE 19 IANA NAMING FUNCTION SEPARATION PROCESS SECTION 19.1 ESTABLISHING AN SCWG (b) The Board shall establish an SCWG if each of the following occurs: (ii) The SCWG Creation Recommendation has been approved by the vote of (A) a supermajority of the ccNSO Council … and (B) a GNSO Supermajority; No recommended action, noting that GNSO Supermajority is defined in Bylaws: “ (A) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council members of each House, or (B) three-fourths (3/4) of the Council members of one House and a majority of the Council members of the other House.” No new procedures or changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures and/or ICANN Bylaws Assumptions: In those instances where there is a reference to GNSO Supermajority, there is no need to add the voting threshold to section 11.3 as a GNSO Supermajority is already a defined term. SECTION 19.4 SCWG RECOMMENDATIONS (b) ICANN shall not implement an SCWG recommendation (including an SCWG recommendation to issue an IANA Naming Function RFP) unless, with respect to each such recommendation (each, an “SCWG Recommendation”), each of the following occurs: (i) The SCWG No recommended action, noting that GNSO Supermajority is defined in Bylaws: “ (A) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council members of each House, or (B) three-fourths (3/4) of the Council members of one House and a majority of the Council members of the other House.” No new procedures or changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures and/or ICANN Bylaws Assumptions: In those instances where there is a reference to GNSO Supermajority, there is no need to add the voting threshold to section 11.3 as a GNSO Supermajority is already a defined term.