6. Has the applicant demonstrated that they are of good Yes No standing in the occupation or profession that they have Comment: stated in their application? How? 7. Has the applicant demonstrated competence as a Yes No Probity Service Provider (Procurement) in the stated Comment: occupation or profession that they have stated in their application? How? 8. Has the applicant demonstrated that they have sufficient Yes No and relevant experience in the industry or area of Comment: practice in which this accreditation is sought? How? Yes No 9. Has the applicant demonstrated to the panel that they have sufficient understanding of probity, integrity, ethics, Comment: fiduciary duty, related law and relevant disciplines? How? 10. Has the applicant satisfactorily completed the relevant Yes No update and continuing professional development Comment: requirements to obtain accreditation? 11. Are there any possible impediments to accreditation known to the panel at the time of the interview? If yes, state or describe such impediments. 12. What other matters considered by the panel to be Yes No relevant? Comment: Based on all of the information available to the Panel, the Panel considers that the Applicant is / is not (strike through that which is not applicable) suitable to be accredited, and be included on the IAMA Accreditation Register for Probity Service Provider - Procurement. Accreditation recommended? (Select one) Yes No Approval for inclusion on the Register of Probity Service Providers (Procurement)? (Select one) Yes No Reasons for recommendation (must be stated) Dissenting reasons (if any)
6. Has the applicant demonstrated that they are of good standing in the occupation or profession that they have stated in their application? How? Yes No Comment: 7. Has the applicant demonstrated competence as a Probity Service Provider (Procurement) in the stated occupation or profession that they have stated in their application? How? Yes No Comment: 8. Has the applicant demonstrated that they have sufficient and relevant experience in the industry or area of practice in which this accreditation is sought? How? Yes No Comment: 9. Has the applicant demonstrated to the panel that they have sufficient understanding of probity, integrity, ethics, fiduciary duty, related law and relevant disciplines? How? Yes No Comment: 10. Has the applicant satisfactorily completed the relevant update and continuing professional development requirements to obtain accreditation? Yes No Comment: 11. Are there any possible impediments to accreditation known to the panel at the time of the interview? If yes, state or describe such impediments. 12. What other matters considered by the panel to be relevant? Yes No Comment: Based on all of the information available to the Panel, the Panel considers that the Applicant is / is not (strike through that which is not applicable) suitable to be accredited, and be included on the IAMA Accreditation Register for Probity Service Provider - Procurement. Accreditation recommended? (Select one) Yes No Approval for inclusion on the Register of Probity Service Providers (Procurement)? (Select one) Yes No Reasons for recommendation (must be stated) Dissenting reasons (if any)