of diverse value systems (see Figure 5.2) are in conflict when interpreting the significance, contemporary context or social value, and ultimately defining the sustainably future of historic sites or buildings. Figure 5.2 Defining the Field of Historic Preservation through Dichotomous Values (Wells 2014:1) For Wells, there are four major value sets, these include; Age Value: Generally, the more the significant the age and historical foundations of the site the more value and protection a site is given. Judgments are made as to the architectural and technological Design Value: significance, does it have a particular importance within a movement, style or is an exemplar of a technological innovation. Like age value, the more important the site the higher the protection and perceived social and cultural significance. Experts will bring with them a set of personal and Expert Values: organizational values that have been informed by their education, aesthetic preferences and Worldview etc. This directly will inform their interaction and interpretation of sites. Community Values: The various community members and type of communities will bring with them various sets of values according to whether they are communities of interest (For example The Georgian Society etc.), geographical communities or non-engaging or apathetic communities. These differing value systems and notions of value are often in conflict with each other as they underpin multiple interpretations of sites, as Mansfield (2008:274) states: There is a plurality of competing interpretations of conservation value between the various professional consultants engaged in conservation work and the general perceptions. public’s
of diverse value systems (see Figure 5.2) are in conflict when interpreting the significance, contemporary context or social value, and ultimately defining the sustainably future of historic sites or buildings. Figure 5.2 Defining the Field of Historic Preservation through Dichotomous Values (Wells 2014:1) For Wells, there are four major value sets, these include; Age Value: Generally, the more the significant the age and historical foundations of the site the more value and protection a site is given. Design Value: Judgments are made as to the architectural and technological significance, does it have a particular importance within a movement, style or is an exemplar of a technological innovation. Like age value, the more important the site the higher the protection and perceived social and cultural significance. Expert Values: Experts will bring with them a set of personal and organizational values that have been informed by their education, aesthetic preferences and Worldview etc. This directly will inform their interaction and interpretation of sites. Community Values: The various community members and type of communities will bring with them various sets of values according to whether they are communities of interest (For example The Georgian Society etc.), geographical communities or non-engaging or apathetic communities. These differing value systems and notions of value are often in conflict with each other as they underpin multiple interpretations of sites, as Mansfield (2008:274) states: There is a plurality of competing interpretations of conservation value between the various professional consultants engaged in conservation work and the general public’s perceptions.