Promotional advertising of Gambling by licensees should not be allowed and I am totally unconvinced by the case published in the Media related to the claims of Free to Air TV Stations that they need the associated revenue to fund the coverage of other Sporting Events when they pay $ Billions for coverage rights of the Football and Cricket codes and are reported as charging around $100,000 for a 30 second advertisement during the Grand Finals Furthermore if this argument has merit then so has a return to tobacco advertising and promotion the banning of which represented a huge loss to the Racing codes The publication of prices and comparative offerings should be allowed There is a need at present for existing truth in advertising regulators to study advertising picturing young people receiving large cash dividends from relatively small bets CREDIT BETTING AND OR LOANS OR UP FRONT CASH ADVANCES SHOULD BE BANNED UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF LICENCE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PROFESSIONAL GAMBLERS WHO SHOULD BE OBLIGED TO COMPLY WITH ADEQUATE CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS AS APPLICABLE IN OTHER COMMERCIAL AREAS Interactive gambling is now a reality the responsibility for its management has now fallen upon the Commonwealth whether it wishes to be involved or not but further however those areas of high employment such as the racing codes are desperate for a national intervention in the gambling sector so as to remove the advantage of product providers who choose to take advantage of the modern electronic services substantially provided and regulated by the Commonwealth whilst exploiting State Based laws established when even telephone betting was a novelty to avoid paying any support to the providers of the product from which they make their profits and worse those locked into paying product fees under past purchase contracts are moving to supply other either artificial or questionable products outside this responsibility
Promotional advertising of Gambling by licensees should not be allowed and I am totally unconvinced by the case published in the Media related to the claims of Free to Air TV Stations that they need the associated revenue to fund the coverage of other Sporting Events when they pay $ Billions for coverage rights of the Football and Cricket codes and are reported as charging around $100,000 for a 30 second advertisement during the Grand Finals Furthermore if this argument has merit then so has a return to tobacco advertising and promotion the banning of which represented a huge loss to the Racing codes The publication of prices and comparative offerings should be allowed There is a need at present for existing truth in advertising regulators to study advertising picturing young people receiving large cash dividends from relatively small bets CREDIT BETTING AND OR LOANS OR UP FRONT CASH ADVANCES SHOULD BE BANNED UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF LICENCE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PROFESSIONAL GAMBLERS WHO SHOULD BE OBLIGED TO COMPLY WITH ADEQUATE CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS AS APPLICABLE IN OTHER COMMERCIAL AREAS Interactive gambling is now a reality the responsibility for its management has now fallen upon the Commonwealth whether it wishes to be involved or not but further however those areas of high employment such as the racing codes are desperate for a national intervention in the gambling sector so as to remove the advantage of product providers who choose to take advantage of the modern electronic services substantially provided and regulated by the Commonwealth whilst exploiting State Based laws established when even telephone betting was a novelty to avoid paying any support to the providers of the product from which they make their profits and worse those locked into paying product fees under past purchase contracts are moving to supply other either artificial or questionable products outside this responsibility