fertility (continuous) x predicted effect emerged: “The composite x Conception Risk x SP-DIC mating context Composite = 3.06, = .002 t(7677) p (short-term vs. x Mating Context, = 3.06, t(7677) p long-term) = (p. 205) .002.” predicting attraction fertility (continuous) x socially respected x = 2.46, = t(8793) p = 2.46, = .009 (p. 157) t(8793) p relationship context .009a (short-term vs. on actuarial estimates of “Based long-term) fertility risk given women’s predicting attraction both the day of their cycle when fertility they made the ratings and the typical length of their cycle, we (continuous) x arrogant x examined (a) the extent to = 3.06, = t(8793) p Gangestad, which men who were perceived relationship context = 3.06, = .001 (p. 157) t(8793) p .001a (short-term vs. to possess each trait or characteristic were rated as long-term) Simpon, & particularly attractive by fertile predicting attraction Cousin women and (b) whether fertility (2007) fertility risk interacted (continuous) x women’s with relationship context (i.e., muscular x = 2.69, = t(8793) p rating each man as a long-term relationship context = 2.69, = .004 (p. 157) t(8793) p .004a mate vs. a short-term mate) to (short-term vs. predict how attractive women long-term) perceived certain men to predicting attraction be.” (p. 154) fertility (continuous) x = 3.07, = t(8793) p = 3.07, = .001 (p. 157) t(8793) p confrontative x .001a relationship context (short-term vs.
fertility (continuous) x composite x mating context (short-term vs. long-term) predicting attraction “The predicted effect emerged: Conception Risk x SP-DIC Composite x Mating Context, t(7677) = 3.06, p = .002.” (p. 205) t(7677) = 3.06, p = .002 Gangestad, Simpon, & Cousin (2007) “Based on actuarial estimates of women’s fertility risk given both the day of their cycle when they made the ratings and the typical length of their cycle, we examined (a) the extent to which men who were perceived to possess each trait or characteristic were rated as particularly attractive by fertile women and (b) whether women’s fertility risk interacted with relationship context (i.e., rating each man as a long-term mate vs. a short-term mate) to predict how attractive women perceived certain men to be.” (p. 154) fertility (continuous) x socially respected x relationship context (short-term vs. long-term) predicting attraction t(8793) = 2.46, p = .009 (p. 157) t(8793) = 2.46, p = .009a fertility (continuous) x arrogant x relationship context (short-term vs. long-term) predicting attraction t(8793) = 3.06, p = .001 (p. 157) t(8793) = 3.06, p = .001a fertility (continuous) x muscular x relationship context (short-term vs. long-term) predicting attraction t(8793) = 2.69, p = .004 (p. 157) t(8793) = 2.69, p = .004a fertility (continuous) x confrontative x relationship context (short-term vs. t(8793) = 3.07, p = .001 (p. 157) t(8793) = 3.07, p = .001a