court is satisfied that an application under section 61 or 71 in respect of the offender has been commenced but not determined; and court considers that an interim detention order is not justified; and appears to the court that the documents in support of the application under section 75 would, if proved, justify the making of an interim supervision order; and court is satisfied that it is in the public interest to make an interim supervision order. (3) For the purposes of subsections (1)(c) and (2)(d), the Supreme Court must have regard to— reason why the application section 61 or 71 was not, or will not be, determined before the offender is released from custody or before the expiry of the previous detention order, as the case requires; and matter that the court considers appropriate. (4) The Supreme Court may make no order in circumstances where it is empowered to make an interim detention order or an interim supervision order under this section. (5) The Supreme Court may determine an application under section 75 even if— offender has ceased to be an eligible offender because the custodial sentence has been served or has expired; or offender is no longer subject to a supervision order or a detention order.
court is satisfied that an application under section 61 or 71 in respect of the offender has been commenced but not determined; and court considers that an interim detention order is not justified; and appears to the court that the documents in support of the application under section 75 would, if proved, justify the making of an interim supervision order; and court is satisfied that it is in the public interest to make an interim supervision order. (3) For the purposes of subsections (1)(c) and (2)(d), the Supreme Court must have regard to— reason why the application section 61 or 71 was not, or will not be, determined before the offender is released from custody or before the expiry of the previous detention order, as the case requires; and matter that the court considers appropriate. (4) The Supreme Court may make no order in circumstances where it is empowered to make an interim detention order or an interim supervision order under this section. (5) The Supreme Court may determine an application under section 75 even if— offender has ceased to be an eligible offender because the custodial sentence has been served or has expired; or offender is no longer subject to a supervision order or a detention order.