Project: Date: Reviewer status: ____ Underclassman ____ Engineering Senior ___ Engineering Graduate/Customer/Other Your Scoring Scale 1 3 5 Score Organization and Flow Order and flow unclear, Order and flow clear, Order and flow smooth, may be confusing; time parts fit into whole; time clear; time usage very Comments: usage ineffective used well in general good to achieve purposes Language Language not refined; Language and use of Language shows terms may be misused; terms proper; voice knowledge; very good Comments: voice unsteady clear and steady word choice; persuasive Content Completeness Presentation lacks some Presentation includes Presentation includes key information needed most key information all key information Comments: by client needed by client needed by client Content Reliability Information is uncertain Information appears Information proven and causes doubt about correct and reliable; reliable; key data, Comments: its reliability proof lacking sources, derivations given Visual Aids Visuals crude, have Visuals generally Visuals attractive, some errors, are attractive, have no excellent quality; no Comments: generally readable; serious errors, have errors; achieve desired mixed impact positive impact impact Listening/ Responding Interaction with audience Maintains some rapport Excellent rapport with limited; not effective in with audience; generally audience; very effective Comments: Q/A effective in Q/A listening, answering Q/A Confidentiality No awareness or regard Aware of need to Clearly knows and for client confidentiality respect client ensures appropriate Comments: NA confidentiality; casual client confidentiality observance Team Credibility Team shows lack of Team has most Team exhibits all vital expertise, inability to necessary expertise, expertise, key skills, Comments: perform credibly or moderate ability to poise; able to manage effectively manage project and projects, personnel well personnel Concept Quality* Team partially Team understands Team fully understands understands needs of main needs of clients; diverse needs of clients, Comments: clients; concept not concept plausible, society; concept viable, does not address addresses most innovative, viable, some important criteria* important criteria* satisfies all criteria* Economic Issues Generally ignores cost Discusses primary cost Effectively judges costs, issues; concept not concerns; concept has benefits; concept has Comments: economic plausibility economic viability * Incorporate engineering standards and realistic constraints that include most of the following considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; and political
Project: Date: Reviewer status: ____ Underclassman ____ Engineering Senior ___ Engineering Graduate/Customer/Other Your Scoring Scale Score 1 3 5 Organization and Flow Comments: Order and flow unclear, may be confusing; time usage ineffective Order and flow clear, parts fit into whole; time used well in general Order and flow smooth, clear; time usage very good to achieve purposes Language Comments: Language not refined; terms may be misused; voice unsteady Language and use of terms proper; voice clear and steady Language shows knowledge; very good word choice; persuasive Content Completeness Comments: Presentation lacks some key information needed by client Presentation includes most key information needed by client Presentation includes all key information needed by client Content Reliability Comments: Information is uncertain and causes doubt about its reliability Information appears correct and reliable; proof lacking Information proven reliable; key data, sources, derivations given Visual Aids Comments: Visuals crude, have some errors, are generally readable; mixed impact Visuals generally attractive, have no serious errors, have positive impact Visuals attractive, excellent quality; no errors; achieve desired impact Listening/ Responding Comments: Interaction with audience limited; not effective in Q/A Maintains some rapport with audience; generally effective in Q/A Excellent rapport with audience; very effective listening, answering Q/A Confidentiality Comments: NA No awareness or regard for client confidentiality Aware of need to respect client confidentiality; casual observance Clearly knows and ensures appropriate client confidentiality Team Credibility Comments: Team shows lack of expertise, inability to perform credibly or effectively Team has most necessary expertise, moderate ability to manage project and personnel Team exhibits all vital expertise, key skills, poise; able to manage projects, personnel well Concept Quality* Comments: Team partially understands needs of clients; concept not viable, does not address some important criteria* Team understands main needs of clients; concept plausible, addresses most important criteria* Team fully understands diverse needs of clients, society; concept innovative, viable, satisfies all criteria* Economic Issues Comments: Generally ignores cost issues; concept not Discusses primary cost concerns; concept has economic plausibility Effectively judges costs, benefits; concept has economic viability * Incorporate engineering standards and realistic constraints that include most of the following considerations: economic; environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; and political