DATE OUTCOME OF NO. RESPONDENT MERITS OF INVESTIGATION COMPLAINT INVESTIGATING RECEIVED COMMITTEE (year, month, date and number) 1. R Brittnell It is alleged that the The Investigating (2012/11/20 - 32) against A J Respondent as an official of the Committee considered Killian Pr Tech Local Authority, responsible for the matter and was of Eng (8870177) tender documents scrapped the opinion that there certain requirements of a tender was no prima facie and that” his actions directly evidence of improper deprived consulting engineering conduct by the companies the opportunity to Respondent. participate in a fair tender process”. 2. BRS & R A It is alleged that the The Investigating (2013/05/13 16) – Wilson obo Respondent, appointed to Committee considered BRS Wilson facilitate a township the matter and were of Family Trust development, created an the opinion that there against D A unacceptable conflict of interest was insufficient prima Rees Pr Eng and failed to carry out his facie evidence of (790430) engineering responsibilities with improper conduct by the required degree of the Respondent. competence. 3. W Strydom obo It is alleged that the (2013/06/27 - 27) The Investigating Avondans Respondent rendered Committee considered Home Owners professional services to the the matter and was of Association Developer for the Avondans the opinion that there (AHOA) Development in the was insufficient prima against F J construction of the The facie evidence of Klomp Pr Eng development was taken over by improper conduct by (830442) AHOA. A crack appeared in the the Respondent.
NO. RESPONDENT MERITS OF INVESTIGATION DATE COMPLAINT RECEIVED (year, month, date and number) OUTCOME OF INVESTIGATING COMMITTEE 1. R Brittnell against A J Killian Pr Tech Eng (8870177) It is alleged that the Respondent as an official of the Local Authority, responsible for tender documents scrapped certain requirements of a tender and that” his actions directly deprived consulting engineering companies the opportunity to participate in a fair tender process”. (2012/11/20 - 32) The Investigating Committee considered the matter and was of the opinion that there was no prima facie evidence of improper conduct by the Respondent. 2. BRS & R A Wilson obo BRS Wilson Family Trust against D A Rees Pr Eng (790430) It is alleged that the Respondent, appointed to facilitate a township development, created an unacceptable conflict of interest and failed to carry out his engineering responsibilities with the required degree of competence. (2013/05/13 – 16) The Investigating Committee considered the matter and were of the opinion that there was insufficient prima facie evidence of improper conduct by the Respondent. 3. W Strydom obo Avondans Home Owners Association (AHOA) against F J Klomp Pr Eng (830442) It is alleged that the Respondent rendered professional services to the Developer for the Avondans Development in the construction of the The development was taken over by AHOA. A crack appeared in the (2013/06/27 - 27) The Investigating Committee considered the matter and was of the opinion that there was insufficient prima facie evidence of improper conduct by the Respondent.