Provide for proper Contractor waste disposal Site Supervisor Disposal of waste at SEEFOR Waste the Government Safeguards Generation and approved dumpsite Officer and Disposal (debris Provision of protective AEAs from drainages, gears Used cement Collaboration with bags, etc.) relevant Waste Management Agency for effective waste disposal. Provision of carefully Contractor planned diversion Site Supervisor routes during SEEFOR operation Safeguards Use of signboards and Officer and Traffic public information AEAs Disruption mechanisms to inform the public in advance of operation, schedule closure or diversion, etc. Social Aspects Proper disposal of Contractor Occupational wastes Site Supervisor Health and Provision of protective SEEFOR Safety gear and First Aid Box Safeguards at site Officer and Beneficiaries health AEAs care services will be taken seriously through awareness and preventive care 5.3 Analysis of Project Alternatives In this report, alternatives are analysed to evaluate the character, magnitude and time within which alterations are caused over each one of the environmental elements, considering or nor implementation of the ESMP for the proposed projects. Though, there are number of options, but the options considered here are: 5.3.1 No Project Option This implies that the proposed project shall not be executed or implemented. No project option is not considered a viable option since it keeps every user of the road suffering the worsening conditions. Therefore, it is not considered. 5.3.2 Delayed Project Option This is just as the name implies. This option is usually occasioned by war, host community is resentful/hostile to the project and unfavourable economic climate, but these are not applicable to the proposed project. Therefore, the delayed project option is not accepted. 5.3.3 Go Ahead Option This means going ahead with project based on the professional advice and the cleared ESMP and other relevant safeguards instruments and best practices relating to the execution of the projects. This will definitely aid in employment of youths (one of the PDO objectives), reduction in flooding of the project communities and loss of lives through road accidents occasioned by bad roads. This option is therefore considered as the most viable and recommended for implementation.
Waste Generation and Disposal (debris from drainages, Used cement bags, etc.) Provide for proper waste disposal Disposal of waste at the Government approved dumpsite Provision of protective gears Collaboration with relevant Waste Management Agency for effective waste disposal. Contractor Site Supervisor SEEFOR Safeguards Officer and AEAs Social Aspects Traffic Disruption Provision of carefully planned diversion routes during operation Use of signboards and public information mechanisms to inform the public in advance of operation, schedule closure or diversion, etc. Contractor Site Supervisor SEEFOR Safeguards Officer and AEAs Occupational Health and Safety Proper disposal of wastes Provision of protective gear and First Aid Box at site Beneficiaries health care services will be taken seriously through awareness and preventive care Contractor Site Supervisor SEEFOR Safeguards Officer and AEAs 5.3 Analysis of Project Alternatives In this report, alternatives are analysed to evaluate the character, magnitude and time within which alterations are caused over each one of the environmental elements, considering or nor implementation of the ESMP for the proposed projects. Though, there are number of options, but the options considered here are: 5.3.1 No Project Option This implies that the proposed project shall not be executed or implemented. No project option is not considered a viable option since it keeps every user of the road suffering the worsening conditions. Therefore, it is not considered. 5.3.2 Delayed Project Option This is just as the name implies. This option is usually occasioned by war, host community is resentful/hostile to the project and unfavourable economic climate, but these are not applicable to the proposed project. Therefore, the delayed project option is not accepted. 5.3.3 Go Ahead Option This means going ahead with project based on the professional advice and the cleared ESMP and other relevant safeguards instruments and best practices relating to the execution of the projects. This will definitely aid in employment of youths (one of the PDO objectives), reduction in flooding of the project communities and loss of lives through road accidents occasioned by bad roads. This option is therefore considered as the most viable and recommended for implementation.