Total budgeted cost £3290 Review of expenditure Previous Academic Year Quality of teaching for all Desired outcome Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the Lessons learned Cost action/approach success criteria? Include impact on (and whether you will continue with this approach) pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. To aim to ensure floor Identified children This objective was achieved for all pupils except ` standards are met at the below and just in one child in one subject. 92% success rate. end of KS2 for PP ARE. children compared to Booster groups Reading- 75% ARE, 25% met greater depth Non-pupil premium. [teacher], small group against Non-PP children Reading 47% below, work, targeted 33% ARE & 20% greater depth. planning; use of TA’s Intervention has shown to be successful over two years. To Writing - 75% ARE, 25% met greater depth and school resources. £8500 be continued. Team teaching. against Non- PP children Writing 67% ARE & 13% [Academic Close liaison with greater depth. year] SEND lead and through pupil Maths - Below ARE 25% & ARE 75% against Non-PP children 40% below ARE, 47% ARE & progress management 13% greater depth. meetings. [PP children = 4, NON-PP children =15] Targeted support Desired outcome Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the Lessons learned Cost action/approach success criteria? Include impact on (and whether you will continue with this approach) pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate.
Total budgeted cost £3290 Review of expenditure Previous Academic Year Quality of teaching for all Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost To aim to ensure floor standards are met at the end of KS2 for PP children compared to Non-pupil premium. Identified children below and just in ARE. Booster groups [teacher], small group work, targeted planning; use of TA’s and school resources. Team teaching. Close liaison with SEND lead and through pupil progress management meetings. This objective was achieved for all pupils except one child in one subject. 92% success rate. Reading- 75% ARE, 25% met greater depth against Non-PP children Reading 47% below, 33% ARE & 20% greater depth. Writing - 75% ARE, 25% met greater depth against Non- PP children Writing 67% ARE & 13% greater depth. Maths - Below ARE 25% & ARE 75% against Non-PP children 40% below ARE, 47% ARE & 13% greater depth. [PP children = 4, NON-PP children =15] ` Intervention has shown to be successful over two years. To be continued. £8500 [Academic year] Targeted support Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost