Chuck undertake standard development activities, RPEWG work, developing – comments from a planning perspective. Hassan consider looking into probabilistic methodology, input. RS should continue, – people look at RS to assess reliability criteria. Participate more in NERC monitoring, are they drawing the right conclusions? Technology impact on reliability. Baj Consider having RPEWG be part of RS. Don’t take over functions that others are – already doing. Pick specific things that take advantage of knowledge and strength of this group. Ken Annual study plan does not necessarily look at it from a reliability standpoint. RS – may want to take on the review from the reliability perspective. With the new standards requiring methodologies being developed, RS can take developing and coordinating these methodologies (such as SOLs) for the planning horizon. Coordination form needed in WECC. Marv Take on special and unique issues such as expanding on the transfer capability – in a corridor. Extreme event evaluations. Vishal possibly also add review of disturbance reports – Variable Generation Study Kenneth Wilson – Ken RS did a number of iterations to the report. Implemented all comments, technical – writer also had a few revisions. Final report was transmitted to VGS, but Ken has not heard any comments back. As far as RS is concerned we have completed this assignment. PCC was also notified of this. NERC Standards Activities Update Kenneth Wilson – Ken very briefly reviewed the following activities: Bulk Electric System Definition and Process Comment/Ballot (8/6/13-9/4/13) Assess Trans. Future Needs and Develop Trans. Plans (Project 2006-2: NOPR 5/16/13) Five-Year Review of FAC Standards (Project 2010-2, FAC-010-2.1 and FAC-011-2 comments due 8/1/13-9/16/13) Project 2007-09 Generator Verification – MOD-025-2, MOD-026-1, MOD-027-1, PRC-019-1, PRC-024-1 [voltage ride through] Filed with FERC
Chuck – undertake standard development activities, RPEWG work, developing comments from a planning perspective. Hassan – consider looking into probabilistic methodology, input. RS should continue, people look at RS to assess reliability criteria. Participate more in NERC monitoring, are they drawing the right conclusions? Technology impact on reliability. Baj – Consider having RPEWG be part of RS. Don’t take over functions that others are already doing. Pick specific things that take advantage of knowledge and strength of this group. Ken – Annual study plan does not necessarily look at it from a reliability standpoint. RS may want to take on the review from the reliability perspective. With the new standards requiring methodologies being developed, RS can take developing and coordinating these methodologies (such as SOLs) for the planning horizon. Coordination form needed in WECC. Marv – Take on special and unique issues such as expanding on the transfer capability in a corridor. Extreme event evaluations. Vishal – possibly also add review of disturbance reports Variable Generation Study – Kenneth Wilson Ken – RS did a number of iterations to the report. Implemented all comments, technical writer also had a few revisions. Final report was transmitted to VGS, but Ken has not heard any comments back. As far as RS is concerned we have completed this assignment. PCC was also notified of this. NERC Standards Activities Update – Kenneth Wilson Ken very briefly reviewed the following activities: Bulk Electric System Definition and Process Comment/Ballot (8/6/13-9/4/13) Assess Trans. Future Needs and Develop Trans. Plans (Project 2006-2: NOPR 5/16/13) Five-Year Review of FAC Standards (Project 2010-2, FAC-010-2.1 and FAC-011-2 comments due 8/1/13-9/16/13) Project 2007-09 – Generator Verification MOD-025-2, MOD-026-1, MOD-027-1, PRC-019-1, PRC-024-1 [voltage ride through] Filed with FERC