Developing/ Standard 7: Student Unacceptable Unacceptable Unacceptable Needs Academic Progress. Improvement Rationale: Rationale: Only The goal was an Unacceptable Rationale: percent of the teacher’s adequate goal rather than The progress of students demonstrated a rigorous goal. In English Language Learners Rationale: moderate or acceptable addition, 70 percent of the is unacceptable. In addition, percent of growth. Forty percent students met an adequate the SGPs for English students passed the demonstrated low goal which indicates that Language Learners are low 4th Grade Virginia growth. According to 30 percent of students for two consecutive years. Studies Standards of the rubric, a teacher failed to meet an adequate According to the Standard 7: Learning test. The who is rated as goal and did not make Student Academic Progress benchmark for adequate progress. Rubric, an “Developing/Needs “Unacceptable” accreditation ratings Improvement, Rating indicates that “The “The in History/Social work of the teacher work of the teacher does not Science is a 70 results in student achieve acceptable student percent pass rate. academic progress that academic progress.” The does not meet the progress of English established standard Language Learners in and/or is not achieved unacceptable. with all populations taught by the teacher.” Level 2 Analysis of Student Academic Progress Data Based on the four ratings Exemplary Rationale: Students perform adequately on the 4th Grade Virginia Standards indicated above, indicate Proficient of Learning test but fail to make acceptable progress on the 4th grade reading Developing/ a summative rating for subtest of the Standards of Learning test. In addition, English Language Improvement this fourth grade teacher Learners continue to exhibit low growth in the area of reading as measured by Unacceptable for Standard 7: Student the student growth percentiles. Therefore, an overall rating of Academic Progress. Improvement” aligns with the rubric for Standard 7: “Developing/Needs Student Academic Progress in that work of the teacher results in student “The academic progress that does not meet the established standard and/or is not achieved with all populations taught by the teacher.”
Standard 7: Student Academic Progress. Unacceptable Rationale: Only percent of the teacher’s students demonstrated moderate or acceptable growth. Forty percent demonstrated low growth. According to the rubric, a teacher who is rated as “Developing/Needs Improvement, “The work of the teacher results in student academic progress that does not meet the established standard and/or is not achieved with all populations taught by the teacher.” Unacceptable Rationale: The goal was an adequate goal rather than a rigorous goal. In addition, 70 percent of the students met an adequate goal which indicates that 30 percent of students failed to meet an adequate goal and did not make adequate progress. Developing/ Needs Improvement Unacceptable Rationale: percent of students passed the 4th Grade Virginia Studies Standards of Learning test. The benchmark for accreditation ratings in History/Social Science is a 70 percent pass rate. Unacceptable Rationale: The progress of English Language Learners is unacceptable. In addition, the SGPs for English Language Learners are low for two consecutive years. According to the Standard 7: Student Academic Progress Rubric, an “Unacceptable” Rating indicates that “The work of the teacher does not achieve acceptable student academic progress.” The progress of English Language Learners in unacceptable. Level 2 Analysis of Student Academic Progress Data Based on the four ratings indicated above, indicate a summative rating for this fourth grade teacher for Standard 7: Student Academic Progress. Exemplary Proficient Developing/ Improvement Unacceptable Rationale: Students perform adequately on the 4th Grade Virginia Standards of Learning test but fail to make acceptable progress on the 4th grade reading subtest of the Standards of Learning test. In addition, English Language Learners continue to exhibit low growth in the area of reading as measured by the student growth percentiles. Therefore, an overall rating of “Developing/Needs Improvement” aligns with the rubric for Standard 7: Student Academic Progress in that “The work of the teacher results in student academic progress that does not meet the established standard and/or is not achieved with all populations taught by the teacher.”