to be defined number of impact by the utility 6 5 4 (consequence) dimensions or Commission number of levels per 7 7 7 to be defined impact dimension uses weights on impact yes no yes yes dimensions Intervenors safety, advocate safety(30%), reliability, analytically reliability(25%), environment, safety(40%), derived impact (consequence) environment(5%), compliance, reliability(20%), weights to be dimensions and weights compliance(5%), financial, (not compliance(20%), properly trust(5%), weighted, risk financial(20%) defined by financial(30%) scores only the utility or summed) imposed by the Commission Risk Scores linear scale risk score? no yes yes yes relative or absolute risk relative quasiabsolute quasiabsolute absolute score consequence scenarios in multiple single single scenario single scenario risk scenarios scenario risk formula emphasizes yes no no no high consequence events Areas takes into account threat no, but model interactions and their does not effects on frequency, no no no preclude impact, and impact possibility of it dimensions takes into account no, but model mitigation overlaps on does not no no no different risks and resulting preclude synergies possibility of it under Risk framework calculates consideration and risk scores for programs yes yes yes possible and projects development no methodology no methodology calculates risk reduction in presented, but presented, a way that allows linear scale nonlinear relative yes yes comparisons across the quasiabsolute scores make this enterprise scores make this impossible possible
number of impact (consequence) dimensions 6 5 4 to be defined by the utility or Commission number of levels per impact dimension 7 7 7 to be defined uses weights on impact dimensions yes no yes yes impact (consequence) dimensions and weights safety(30%), reliability(25%), environment(5%), compliance(5%), trust(5%), financial(30%) safety, reliability, environment, compliance, financial, (not weighted, risk scores only summed) safety(40%), reliability(20%), compliance(20%), financial(20%) Intervenors advocate analytically derived weights to be properly defined by the utility or imposed by the Commission Risk Scores linear scale risk score? no yes yes yes relative or absolute risk score relative quasiabsolute quasiabsolute absolute consequence scenarios in risk single scenario multiple scenarios single scenario single scenario risk formula emphasizes high consequence events yes no no no Areas takes into account threat interactions and their effects on frequency, impact, and impact dimensions no no, but model does not preclude possibility of it no no takes into account mitigation overlaps on different risks and resulting synergies no no, but model does not preclude possibility of it no no Risk framework calculates risk scores for programs and projects yes yes under consideration and possible development yes calculates risk reduction in a way that allows comparisons across the enterprise no methodology presented, nonlinear relative scores make this impossible yes no methodology presented, but linear scale quasiabsolute scores make this possible yes