Desired outcome Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the success Lessons learned Cost action/approach criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for (and whether you will continue with this approach) PP, if appropriate. Improve writing in key Staff trained in use High: Observed impact on attainment for all Staff were positive about the training and believe it £20,000 stages1 and 2 of SMB materials children not just PP. WBS evidence pupils using has impacted on pupils’ attitudes to writing. HIP to success metacognition through peer and self-assessment rated provision as Outstanding largely due to impact stickers, magpie and next step questions. Success criteria met. of marking and feedback on accelerating progress in nests, self and peer writing. We will continue to implement this assessment stickers feedback and marking strategy and monitor pupils’ Targeted support and next step response. Desired outcome Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the success Lessons learned Cost questions. action/approach criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for (and whether you will continue with this approach) PP, if appropriate. Improved Year 6 1:1 .delivered by High: increased progress amongst participating This was an effective approach when the focus area £30,000 Literacy qualified teacher children compared to peers. Success Criteria met. was determined by the CT in pupil progress meetings. We will continue next year. Other approaches Desired outcome Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the success Lessons learned Cost action/approach criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for r. (and whether you will continue with this approach) PP, if appropriate.
Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost Improve writing in key stages1 and 2 Staff trained in use of SMB materials to success stickers, magpie nests, self and peer assessment stickers and next step questions. High: Observed impact on attainment for all children not just PP. WBS evidence pupils using metacognition through peer and self-assessment and next step questions. Success criteria met. Staff were positive about the training and believe it has impacted on pupils’ attitudes to writing. HIP rated provision as Outstanding largely due to impact of marking and feedback on accelerating progress in writing. We will continue to implement this feedback and marking strategy and monitor pupils’ response. £20,000 Targeted support Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost Improved Year 6 Literacy 1:1 .delivered by qualified teacher High: increased progress amongst participating children compared to peers. Success Criteria met. This was an effective approach when the focus area was determined by the CT in pupil progress meetings. We will continue next year. r. £30,000 Other approaches Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost