available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. [see FAR 15.305(a) (2) (ii) and (iv)] M.3 RELATIVE WEIGHTS OF EVALUATION FACTORS a. Mission Suitability Subfactors Within the Mission Suitability Factor, the five subfactors will – each be scored on the following numerical weights, which indicate the relative importance of those evaluation areas. Points Subfactor 1 Understanding Technical Requirements 250 – Subfactor 2 Management Plan and Approach 350 – Subfactor 3 Product Assurance 150 – Subfactor 4 Key Personnel 150 – Subfactor 5 Corporate Resources 100 – Total 1000 b. Overall Evaluation Mission suitability, cost, and past performance are essentially equal. – When combined, past performance and mission suitability are more important than cost.
available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. [see FAR 15.305(a) (2) (ii) and (iv)] M.3 RELATIVE WEIGHTS OF EVALUATION FACTORS a. Mission Suitability Subfactors – Within the Mission Suitability Factor, the five subfactors will each be scored on the following numerical weights, which indicate the relative importance of those evaluation areas. Points Subfactor 1 – Understanding Technical Requirements 250 Subfactor 2 – Management Plan and Approach 350 Subfactor 3 – Product Assurance 150 Subfactor 4 – Key Personnel 150 Subfactor 5 – Corporate Resources 100 Total 1000 b. Overall Evaluation – Mission suitability, cost, and past performance are essentially equal. When combined, past performance and mission suitability are more important than cost.