guidelines set forth action for the Organizational Group: formed Presidents Council and by the College and dialogue the District to See screen shot of MCShare – no move an issue from evidence of Presidents Council. In 2) No evidence of dialogue for discussion to Folder Probing Question Administrative Council recommendation. 2<Organizational Groups. There Discussions, was one agenda item for the 3) Limited evidence of dialogue recommendations, Presidents Council in the for VPs Council – 2009 and final Accreditation section of MCShare. implementation of Provided a screenshot. Qualitative 4) Evidence of dialogue for Deans decisions are all evidence. Council from 2008 to 2013 conducted within See screen shot of MCShare – no the four groups evidence of dialogue for 5) Evidence of dialogue for based on the scope Administrative Council. In Folder Students Council from 2008 to of their Probing Question 2<Organizational 2013 responsibility and Groups source of See screen shot of MCShare – Governance Group authority. limited evidence of dialogue for Budgetary VPs Council. In Folder Probing 6) See screen shot of MCShare for decisions and Question 2<Organizational Groups Governance Group. Student Body resource See screen shot of MCShare –more Senate is missing. In Folder allocations are tied comprehensive evidence of Probing Question 2<Governance to Program Plans. dialogue for Deans’ Council. Group. Final decisions in Included agendas for 2012-2013. In this regard are Folder Probing Question 7)See screen shot of MCShare for made by the 2<Organizational Groups. Academic Senate. In Folder Executive council Qualitative some agenda items are Probing Question 2<Governance with input from not filled out. Group. the various See screen shot of MCShare –more Governance Groups comprehensive evidence of 8) See screen shot of Academic according to dialogue for Students’ Council. Senate Budget empty. In Folder faculty Included agendas for 2012-2013. In Probing Question 2<Governance prioritization Folder Probing Question Group. process, facilities 2<Organizational Groups. request, classified Qualitative some agenda items are 9) See screen shot of Academic staff prioritizations not filled out. Senate meeting minutes. In process, etc. Folder Probing Question 2<Governance Group. In the Document Center of MCShare there is ample evidence of dialogue and action 10) See screen shot of Classified
guidelines set forth by the College and the District to move an issue from discussion to recommendation. Discussions, recommendations, and final implementation of decisions are all conducted within the four groups based on the scope of their responsibility and source of authority. Budgetary decisions and resource allocations are tied to Program Plans. Final decisions in this regard are made by the Executive council with input from the various Governance Groups according to faculty prioritization process, facilities request, classified staff prioritizations process, etc. action for the Organizational Group: See screen shot of MCShare – no evidence of Presidents Council. In Folder Probing Question 2<Organizational Groups. There was one agenda item for the Presidents Council in the Accreditation section of MCShare. Provided a screenshot. Qualitative evidence. See screen shot of MCShare – no evidence of dialogue for Administrative Council. In Folder Probing Question 2<Organizational Groups See screen shot of MCShare – limited evidence of dialogue for VPs Council. In Folder Probing Question 2<Organizational Groups See screen shot of MCShare –more comprehensive evidence of dialogue for Deans’ Council. Included agendas for 2012-2013. In Folder Probing Question 2<Organizational Groups. Qualitative some agenda items are not filled out. See screen shot of MCShare –more comprehensive evidence of dialogue for Students’ Council. Included agendas for 2012-2013. In Folder Probing Question 2<Organizational Groups. Qualitative some agenda items are not filled out. In the Document Center of MCShare there is ample evidence of dialogue and action formed Presidents Council and dialogue 2) No evidence of dialogue for Administrative Council 3) Limited evidence of dialogue for VPs Council – 2009 4) Evidence of dialogue for Deans Council from 2008 to 2013 5) Evidence of dialogue for Students Council from 2008 to 2013 Governance Group 6) See screen shot of MCShare for Governance Group. Student Body Senate is missing. In Folder Probing Question 2<Governance Group. 7)See screen shot of MCShare for Academic Senate. In Folder Probing Question 2<Governance Group. 8) See screen shot of Academic Senate Budget empty. In Folder Probing Question 2<Governance Group. 9) See screen shot of Academic Senate meeting minutes. In Folder Probing Question 2<Governance Group. 10) See screen shot of Classified