Kidal 29* 55* 15* 28* 1* 16* 0.10 0.60 94 71 59 0.83 Bamako 54* 86 77 34 60* 57 25 51* 51 0.74 0.85 0.91 Wealth Quintile Poorest§ 52 80 94 28 60 68 20 56 63 0.71 0.93 0.93 94 70 66* 0.94 Poorer 49 86* 28 66* 21 61* 0.73 0.92 Middle 44* 87* 90* 26 67* 68 19 63* 62 0.72 0.93 0.91 92 69 65* 0.94 Richer 49 86* 30 67* 21 63* 0.71 0.95 95 73 63 0.87 Richest 57* 84* 36* 65* 26* 59 0.73 0.91 Residence 94 71 61 0.86 54 87 82 33 62 63 23 55 58 0.71 0.88 0.92 Rural 48* 86 85* 93 28* 61 65 69 21 57 61 65 0.73 0.92 0.93 0.93 IRS 86 84 93 61 64 70 56 60 64 0.92 0.94 0.92 No§ 87* 66* 60* 0.90 91 93* 65 74* 60 67* 0.92 0.90 Yes compared to reference group (denoted with §) Observations Between 2006 and 2010, the use:access ratio for almost all regions increased to above .80, and this was maintained through the 2012-2013 survey. This pattern was the same for both wealth quintiles (when measured) as well as rural and urban sites. ITN ownership, use, and access tended to be higher as wealth increased, although this did not affect the use:access ratio, which was similar among all regions, wealth quintiles, and residencies. Households
Kidal 29* 55* 15* 28* 1* 16* 0.10 0.60 Bamako 54* 86 77 94 34 60* 57 71 25 51* 51 59 0.74 0.85 0.91 0.83 Wealth Quintile Poorest§ 52 80 94 28 60 68 20 56 63 0.71 0.93 0.93 Poorer 49 86* 94 28 66* 70 21 61* 66* 0.73 0.92 0.94 Middle 44* 87* 90* 26 67* 68 19 63* 62 0.72 0.93 0.91 Richer 49 86* 92 30 67* 69 21 63* 65* 0.71 0.95 0.94 Richest 57* 84* 95 36* 65* 73 26* 59 63 0.73 0.91 0.87 Residence 54 87 82 94 33 62 63 71 23 55 58 61 0.71 0.88 0.92 0.86 Rural 48* 86 85* 93 28* 61 65 69 21 57 61 65 0.73 0.92 0.93 0.93 IRS No§ 86 84 93 61 64 70 56 60 64 0.92 0.94 0.92 Yes 91 93* 87* 65 74* 66* 60 67* 60* 0.92 0.90 0.90 compared to reference group (denoted with §) Observations Between 2006 and 2010, the use:access ratio for almost all regions increased to above .80, and this was maintained through the 2012-2013 survey. This pattern was the same for both wealth quintiles (when measured) as well as rural and urban sites. ITN ownership, use, and access tended to be higher as wealth increased, although this did not affect the use:access ratio, which was similar among all regions, wealth quintiles, and residencies. Households