10. Date of ALJ ruling: September 6, 2013 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination N/A (specify): 12 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.16-12-047 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: December 20, 2016 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: February 17, 2017 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes Additional Comments on Part I: # CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Comment(s) TURN did not receive an affirmative 1 ruling on its Notice of Intent in this proceeding. As explained in the Intervenor Commission’s an Compensation guide, “normally, ALJ Ruling need not be issued unless: (a) the NOI has requested a finding of financial “significant hardship” under § 1802(g). (b) the NOI is deficient; or (c) the ALJ desires to provide guidance on specific issues of the of these NOI.” (page 12) Since none factors apply to the NOI submitted in this proceeding, there was no need for an ALJ ruling in response to TURN’s NOI. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), §1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Claimed Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Contribution(s) Claimed Contribution(s) 1. Water-Energy Calculator Verified (Calc.) / Embedded Energy The Commission modified the Water-Energy calculator (W-E
10. Date of ALJ ruling: September 6, 2013 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): N/A 12 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.16-12-047 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: December 20, 2016 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: February 17, 2017 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes Additional Comments on Part I: # Intervenor’s Comment(s) CPUC Discussion 1 TURN did not receive an affirmative ruling on its Notice of Intent in this proceeding. As explained in the Commission’s Intervenor Compensation guide, “normally, an ALJ Ruling need not be issued unless: (a) the NOI has requested a finding of “significant financial hardship” under § 1802(g). (b) the NOI is deficient; or (c) the ALJ desires to provide guidance on specific issues of the NOI.” (page 12) Since none of these factors apply to the NOI submitted in this proceeding, there was no need for an ALJ ruling in response to TURN’s NOI. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), §1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion 1. Water-Energy Calculator (Calc.) / Embedded Energy The Commission modified the Water-Energy calculator (W-E Verified