the plan is working. Wherever possible and applicable, survey data should be broken down by demographic and/or branch/campus/pathway groupings, and comments provided on any notable findings. A description of formative and summative assessments of student learning and professional development used by college or school A description of standardized and comparative assessments of student learning and professional development used by college or school How the assessment plan measures student achievement at defined levels of the professional competencies that support attainment of the educational outcomes in aggregate and at the individual student level A description of how the college or school uses information generated within the curriculum assessment plan(s) to advance quality within its Doctor of Pharmacy program How feedback from the assessments is used to improve student learning, outcomes, and curricular effectiveness How the college or school uses the analysis of assessment measures to improve student learning and the level of achievement of the educational outcomes How the college or school is applying the guidelines for this standard in to comply with the intent and expectation of the standard Any other notable achievements, innovations or quality improvements Interpretation of the data from the applicable AACP standardized survey questions, especially notable differences from national or peer group norms [TEXT BOX] [15,000 character including spaces] (approximately six pages) College or School’s Final Self-Evaluation: Self-assess how well the program is in compliance with the standard by putting a check in the appropriate box : Compliant Compliant with Monitoring Partially Compliant Non Compliant No factors that compromise No factors exist that Factors that compromise Factors that compromise • current compliance; no factors compromise current current compliance; an current compliance; an exist that, if not addressed, may compliance; factors exist that, appropriate plan exists to appropriate plan to address the compromise future compliance. if not addressed, may address the factors that factors that compromise compromise future compliance compromise compliance and it compliance does not exist or /or has been initiated; the plan has has not yet been initiated /or Factors exist that compromise not been fully implemented Adequate information was not • • current compliance; an and/or there is not yet sufficient provided to assess compliance appropriate plan exists to evidence that the plan is address the factors that addressing the factors and will compromise compliance; the bring the program into plan has been compliance. implemented; sufficient evidence already exists that the plan is addressing the factors and will bring the program into full compliance. Compliant Compliant with Monitoring Partially Compliant Non Compliant Recommended Monitoring: If applicable, briefly describe issues or elements of the standard that may require further monitoring. [TEXT BOX] [1,000 character limit, including spaces]
the plan is working. Wherever possible and applicable, survey data should be broken down by demographic and/or branch/campus/pathway groupings, and comments provided on any notable findings. A description of formative and summative assessments of student learning and professional development used by college or school A description of standardized and comparative assessments of student learning and professional development used by college or school How the assessment plan measures student achievement at defined levels of the professional competencies that support attainment of the educational outcomes in aggregate and at the individual student level A description of how the college or school uses information generated within the curriculum assessment plan(s) to advance quality within its Doctor of Pharmacy program How feedback from the assessments is used to improve student learning, outcomes, and curricular effectiveness How the college or school uses the analysis of assessment measures to improve student learning and the level of achievement of the educational outcomes How the college or school is applying the guidelines for this standard in to comply with the intent and expectation of the standard Any other notable achievements, innovations or quality improvements Interpretation of the data from the applicable AACP standardized survey questions, especially notable differences from national or peer group norms [TEXT BOX] [15,000 character including spaces] (approximately six pages) College or School’s Final Self-Evaluation: Self-assess how well the program is in compliance with the standard by putting a check in the appropriate box : Compliant Compliant with Monitoring Partially Compliant Non Compliant No factors that compromise current compliance; no factors exist that, if not addressed, may compromise future compliance. No factors exist that compromise current compliance; factors exist that, if not addressed, may compromise future compliance /or • Factors exist that compromise current compliance; an appropriate plan exists to address the factors that compromise compliance; the plan has been implemented; sufficient evidence already exists that the plan is addressing the factors and will bring the program into full compliance. Factors that compromise current compliance; an appropriate plan exists to address the factors that compromise compliance and it has been initiated; the plan has not been fully implemented and/or there is not yet sufficient evidence that the plan is addressing the factors and will bring the program into compliance. • Factors that compromise current compliance; an appropriate plan to address the factors that compromise compliance does not exist or has not yet been initiated /or • Adequate information was not provided to assess compliance Compliant Compliant with Monitoring Partially Compliant Non Compliant Recommended Monitoring: If applicable, briefly describe issues or elements of the standard that may require further monitoring. [TEXT BOX] [1,000 character limit, including spaces]