13. Sensitive to Need better definition as to Need better definition as to Need better definition as to Need better definition as to change who the decision-makers are who the decision-makers are who the decision-makers are who the decision-makers are i.e. government or businesses i.e. government or businesses. i.e. government or businesses. i.e. government or businesses On a temporal basis it was On a temporal basis it was agreed that change is agreed that change is detected, detected, but on a spatial but on a spatial scale it depends scale it depends on who is on who is being surveyed and being surveyed and the scale the scale of business should be of business should be defined defined 14. Human-induced Criterion considered irrelevant Criterion considered irrelevant Criterion considered irrelevant Criterion considered irrelevant vs natural changes for business indicators for the business indicators for the business indicators for the business indicators 15. Communication Disagreed with the options Communicating the results Queried whether the indicator paper, stating that the indicator would be simple enough, but is accepted by all major is complex, difficult to communicating the survey to stakeholders. There was some communicate and not accepted businesses would be difficult debate in the group about what by all major stakeholders, as without careful wording. It the indicator is actually opposed to simple, easy to depends on the interpretation measuring and some confusion communicate and accepted. If and understanding of in the interpretation asking a CEO, it will probably be biodiversity better understood, than asking someone to answer that works for the business on-the-ground or in a more junior position; this is due to understanding and interpretation of the meaning of the word biodiversity, and so the question would have to be carefully phrased and targeted
13. Sensitive to change Need better definition as to who the decision-makers are i.e. government or businesses Need better definition as to who the decision-makers are i.e. government or businesses. On a temporal basis it was agreed that change is detected, but on a spatial scale it depends on who is being surveyed and the scale of business should be defined Need better definition as to who the decision-makers are i.e. government or businesses. On a temporal basis it was agreed that change is detected, but on a spatial scale it depends on who is being surveyed and the scale of business should be defined Need better definition as to who the decision-makers are i.e. government or businesses 14. Human-induced vs natural changes Criterion considered irrelevant for business indicators Criterion considered irrelevant for the business indicators Criterion considered irrelevant for the business indicators Criterion considered irrelevant for the business indicators 15. Communication Disagreed with the options paper, stating that the indicator is complex, difficult to communicate and not accepted by all major stakeholders, as opposed to simple, easy to communicate and accepted. If asking a CEO, it will probably be better understood, than asking someone to answer that works for the business on-the-ground or in a more junior position; this is due to understanding and interpretation of the meaning of the word biodiversity, and so the question would have to be carefully phrased and targeted Communicating the results would be simple enough, but communicating the survey to businesses would be difficult without careful wording. It depends on the interpretation and understanding of biodiversity Queried whether the indicator is accepted by all major stakeholders. There was some debate in the group about what the indicator is actually measuring and some confusion in the interpretation