Including outcomes from MIWP-16 Check of legislation and existing technical guidance documents and propose changes as needed and prepare document for discussion at the Art. 22 Committee. Collaborate with other MIWP activities/groups Implementation [2017] (provided that a mandate for revision of the 2009 Decision is given) Delivery of technical proposals for an updated MR decision and corresponding technical guidance documents Prototype / agile development of updated dashboard according to the technical specifications Country fiche system: editing / visualization Guidelines (user documentation) Testing and improvement [2018] Technical input for the updated of 2009 MR Decision and corresponding technical Outcomes guidance documents Proposals for an updated dashboard with a system to visualize and edit country fiches User documentation Proposed Impact Technical Adjustment / Bug Fixing Technical Improvement / Development Practical Support for Implementing Process Cost Reducing Effect for Implementing Process Direct Support on Policy-Making / - Activities Date of Kick-off: 2016 Timeline Proposed Date of Completion: 31/12/2018 Required human MIG-P, MIG-T and INSPIRE rapporteurs with experience of at least one monitoring and one resources and reporting exercise. Ideally some of those people would have been active in MIWP-16 and expertise would be already using the tools developed under MIWP-16 to ensure a good transfer of knowledge. Required financial Some funding is foreseen by DG ENV through the Administrative Arrangement with the resources and JRC. possible funding Financial resources will be needed to finance the implementation of the updated dashboard and to follow the development of the needs’ analysis, functional analysis and their translation into technical requirements. Most resources will be needed in 2017 for actual implementation and slightly less in 2018 for testing and improvement. From 2019 onwards, funding should come from the same mechanisms put in place for the validators of MIWP-5. Assuming that a facilitator does not need to be paid, resources should be put aside for a minimum of 2 physical workshops per year. Overall risk level of Risk factors to be considered Risk factors the action Missing Resources (especially in 2016 as resource planning for High 2016 already took place)
Including outcomes from MIWP-16 Check of legislation and existing technical guidance documents and propose changes as needed and prepare document for discussion at the Art. 22 Committee. Collaborate with other MIWP activities/groups Implementation [2017] (provided that a mandate for revision of the 2009 Decision is given) Delivery of technical proposals for an updated MR decision and corresponding technical guidance documents Prototype / agile development of updated dashboard according to the technical specifications Country fiche system: editing / visualization Guidelines (user documentation) Testing and improvement [2018] Outcomes Technical input for the updated of 2009 MR Decision and corresponding technical guidance documents Proposals for an updated dashboard with a system to visualize and edit country fiches User documentation Proposed Impact Technical Adjustment / Bug Fixing Technical Improvement / Development Practical Support for Implementing Process Cost Reducing Effect for Implementing Process Direct Support on Policy-Making / - Activities Timeline Date of Kick-off: 2016 Proposed Date of Completion: 31/12/2018 Required human resources and expertise MIG-P, MIG-T and INSPIRE rapporteurs with experience of at least one monitoring and one reporting exercise. Ideally some of those people would have been active in MIWP-16 and would be already using the tools developed under MIWP-16 to ensure a good transfer of knowledge. Required financial resources and possible funding Some funding is foreseen by DG ENV through the Administrative Arrangement with the JRC. Financial resources will be needed to finance the implementation of the updated dashboard and to follow the development of the needs’ analysis, functional analysis and their translation into technical requirements. Most resources will be needed in 2017 for actual implementation and slightly less in 2018 for testing and improvement. From 2019 onwards, funding should come from the same mechanisms put in place for the validators of MIWP-5. Assuming that a facilitator does not need to be paid, resources should be put aside for a minimum of 2 physical workshops per year. Risk factors Overall risk level of the action High Risk factors to be considered Missing Resources (especially in 2016 as resource planning for 2016 already took place)