Considers WPS holistically, Identifies desired outcomes for closer Emphasise cooperation document’ provisions Norway ‘Living linking the agenda to health Revisions include results coordination and between government, NGOs allow for adjustments and and education efforts framework and indicators to cooperation between all and research groups revision on ongoing basis 2006, Sexual violence is identified enhance M&E actors CS and academia/research Identifies annual budget 2011-13, as a cross-cutting issue Annual work plan developed institutions meet allocation for WPS 2015-18 to complement the NAP and monitoring working specify important action points group twice/year for the coming year and Considered a in its ‘pioneer’ milestones engagement with and External review of integration of research government’s implementation institutes Rather than specify funding in the NAP they explain how funds will be earmarked for WPS within the existing budgetary framework Portugal Notes relevance of WPS M&E framework includes Does not commit Revision aims to strengthen Revised NAP drawn from agenda for outcome indicators and allocated funding cooperation with CS, recommendations of ‘peaceful 2009-13, countries’ as well as timeframe particularly regarding independent external 2014-18 countries evaluation of 1st NAP Interim assessments assessment of revised NAP conducted NAP working group meets Revised NAP calls for independent external with CS twice/year Implementing agencies evaluation at end of its term required to develop NAP (same as in 1st NAP) annual work Working group meets twice a year
Norway 2006, 2011-13, 2015-18 Considers WPS holistically, linking the agenda to health and education efforts Sexual violence is identified as a cross-cutting issue Identifies desired outcomes Revisions include results framework and indicators to enhance M&E Annual work plan developed to complement the NAP and specify important action points for the coming year and milestones External review of government’s implementation Rather than specify funding in the NAP they explain how funds will be earmarked for WPS within the existing budgetary framework for closer coordination and cooperation between all actors Emphasise cooperation between government, NGOs and research groups CS and academia/research institutions meet monitoring working group twice/year Considered a ‘pioneer’ in its engagement with and integration of research institutes ‘Living document’ provisions allow for adjustments and revision on ongoing basis Identifies annual budget allocation for WPS Portugal 2009-13, 2014-18 Notes relevance of WPS agenda for ‘peaceful countries’ as well as countries M&E framework includes outcome indicators and timeframe Interim assessments conducted Implementing agencies required to develop NAP annual work Working group meets twice a year Does not commit allocated funding Revision aims to strengthen cooperation with CS, particularly regarding assessment of revised NAP NAP working group meets with CS twice/year Revised NAP drawn from recommendations of independent external evaluation of 1st NAP Revised NAP calls for independent external evaluation at end of its term (same as in 1st NAP)