health status was in excellent health in excellent health in excellent health rated higher before vs. 47% before vs. 50% before vs. 46% after after after 26% before vs. 26% before vs. 24% before vs. more health children’s 32% after 31% after 30% after was thought to be better than one year earlier. 74% before 80% before 79% before children had fewer without a sick day without a sick day without a sick day sick days in the vs. 82% after vs. 83% after vs. 82% after previous four weeks Percentage not 28% Percentage not 1 in 4 children with a available. available. chronic condition had the condition detected because of care provided while in the hawk-i Program. Impact on Families – In 95% of families In 96% of families In 96% of families stress was reduced - more than 75% - more than 75% more than 75% – of families said it of families said it of families said it had reduced had reduced had reduced stress stress stress “a lot” “a lot” “a lot” Reduced 57% worried 54% worried worry about the ability “a “a significantly before before to pay for health care great deal” great deal” vs. 19% after vs. 20% after Significantly 25% before vs. 23 % before vs. the activities of fewer children 14% after 12% after significantly fewer were limited. children were limited because of the concerns about health care costs Significantly more Significantly more Significantly more parents health parents had parents had parents had coverage status health insurance health insurance health insurance one year after one year after one year after their children their children their children started on the started on the started on the hawk-i Program. hawk-i Program. hawk-i Program.
health status was rated higher in excellent health before vs. 47% after in excellent health before vs. 50% after in excellent health before vs. 46% after more children’s health was thought to be better than one year earlier. 26% before vs. 32% after 26% before vs. 31% after 24% before vs. 30% after children had fewer sick days in the previous four weeks 74% before without a sick day vs. 82% after 80% before without a sick day vs. 83% after 79% before without a sick day vs. 82% after 1 in 4 children with a chronic condition had the condition detected because of care provided while in the hawk-i Program. Percentage not available. 28% Percentage not available. Impact on Families – stress was reduced In 95% of families - more than 75% of families said it had reduced stress “a lot” In 96% of families - more than 75% of families said it had reduced stress “a lot” In 96% of families – more than 75% of families said it had reduced stress “a lot” worry about the ability to pay for health care Reduced significantly 57% worried “a great deal” before vs. 19% after 54% worried “a great deal” before vs. 20% after the activities of significantly fewer children were limited because of the concerns about health care costs Significantly fewer children were limited. 25% before vs. 14% after 23 % before vs. 12% after parents health coverage status Significantly more parents had health insurance one year after their children started on the hawk-i Program. Significantly more parents had health insurance one year after their children started on the hawk-i Program. Significantly more parents had health insurance one year after their children started on the hawk-i Program.