in the past month. Furthermore, I have received nearly 2,000 pages worth of harassing emails from these individuals since filing my Motion for Terminating Sanctions in mid-March. I am now receiving rather absurd harassing emails from Lana Clarkson’s publicist, Ed Lozzi, who posed a question about Michelle Rice. I would like the Court to review that document. This is the individual who shot herself at Phil Spector’s house on February 3, 2007 and I am not a party to that case. Exhibit A: Emails from Ed Lozzi dated May 28, 2015 at 8:33 AM; Should this Court decide to instruct Plaintiffs to file their Motion for Sanctions, which contains a reference to the Phil Spector “gun” incident, they should be instructed to formally notify Phil Spector’s attorney of record or appellate attorney as he has a right to confront his accuser. In the alternative, they should be instructed to remove the statements. I referred to the three versions of that statement to address a pattern of perjury on the part of Leonard Cohen and not to prove which version was correct. That is none of my business. I have however taken the following position about this situation vis a vis Leonard Cohen: 1) For approximately 20 years, Leonard Cohen personally told me that Phil Spector never held a gun on him; 2) Mick Brown, UK Telegraph, advised me that he personally reviewed the Spector Grand Jury transcripts and Leonard Cohen’s statements/testimony was presented to the jury; 3) the Spector prosecution’s Motion in Limine (February 2005) is readily available online at LA Superior Court and that document contains one version of Leonard Cohen’s highly embellished alleged “gun” story related to Phil Spector; and, 4) there are now three versions of Leonard Cohen’s goo rock ‘n roll “gun” story before LA Superior Court at this time. Cohen’s Motion for Sanctions takes the position, if I recall correctly, that I said he perjured himself before Phil Spector’s Grand Jury. The Grand Jury Legal Adviser herself was unable to determine what witness presented these statements and/or testimony. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
in the past month. Furthermore, I have received nearly 2,000 pages worth of harassing emails from these individuals since filing my Motion for Terminating Sanctions in mid-March. I am now receiving rather absurd harassing emails from Lana Clarkson’s publicist, Ed Lozzi, who posed a question about Michelle Rice. I would like the Court to review that document. This is the individual who shot herself at Phil Spector’s house on February 3, 2007 and I am not a party to that case. Exhibit A: Emails from Ed Lozzi dated May 28, 2015 at 8:33 AM; Should this Court decide to instruct Plaintiffs to file their Motion for Sanctions, which contains a reference to the Phil Spector “gun” incident, they should be instructed to formally notify Phil Spector’s attorney of record or appellate attorney as he has a right to confront his accuser. In the alternative, they should be instructed to remove the statements. I referred to the three versions of that statement to address a pattern of perjury on the part of Leonard Cohen and not to prove which version was correct. That is none of my business. I have however taken the following position about this situation vis a vis Leonard Cohen: 1) For approximately 20 years, Leonard Cohen personally told me that Phil Spector never held a gun on him; 2) Mick Brown, UK Telegraph, advised me that he personally reviewed the Spector Grand Jury transcripts and Leonard Cohen’s statements/testimony was presented to the jury; 3) the Spector prosecution’s Motion in Limine (February 2005) is readily available online at LA Superior Court and that document contains one version of Leonard Cohen’s highly embellished alleged “gun” story related to Phil Spector; and, 4) there are now three versions of Leonard Cohen’s goo rock ‘n roll “gun” story before LA Superior Court at this time. Cohen’s Motion for Sanctions takes the position, if I recall correctly, that I said he perjured himself before Phil Spector’s Grand Jury. The Grand Jury Legal Adviser herself was unable to determine what witness presented these statements and/or testimony. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.