are demonstrated in figure 24. Data was analysed for 8 participants using the psp.net website, before it was discontinued in October 2015 (table 26). Data for the 3 participants with baseline moderate adherence rates are shown in table 28. psp.net data, n=8 Manual calculation, n=13 Mean (SD) Median (IQR) Mean (SD) Median (IQR) [95% CI] [95% CI] Pre-text 91.3 (11.7) 94.8 (84-98) 80.6 (25.0) 95.2 (68-98) period [83.7-98.8] [67.0-94.2] Text period 94.9 (6.1) 96.1 (91-98) 80.2 (29.5) 94.8 (76-98) [90.9-98.8] [64.2-96.3] P 0.2 0.9 Table 26 - Mean (SD) [95% CI] adherence rates for the pre-text and text periods. Adherence rates are percentages Figure 23 Individual participant adherence for the pre-text and text periods – Figure 24 Sub-groups of baseline adherence A= Good (80-100%), B = Moderate – – C= Poor ( <50%)
are demonstrated in figure 24. Data was analysed for 8 participants using the psp.net website, before it was discontinued in October 2015 (table 26). Data for the 3 participants with baseline moderate adherence rates are shown in table 28. psp.net data, n=8 Manual calculation, n=13 Mean (SD) [95% CI] Median (IQR) Mean (SD) [95% CI] Median (IQR) Pre-text period 91.3 (11.7) [83.7-98.8] 94.8 (84-98) 80.6 (25.0) [67.0-94.2] 95.2 (68-98) Text period 94.9 (6.1) [90.9-98.8] 96.1 (91-98) 80.2 (29.5) [64.2-96.3] 94.8 (76-98) P 0.2 0.9 Table 26 - Mean (SD) [95% CI] adherence rates for the pre-text and text periods. Adherence rates are percentages Figure 23 – Individual participant adherence for the pre-text and text periods Figure 24 – Sub-groups of baseline adherence – A= Good (80-100%), B = Moderate C= Poor ( <50%)