case definition unclear consistent (IDB & HDR or EDR) Scope of data 2 Two or more Just one No 2 “warning collection “warning flags” “warning flag” flag” - FDS sample 2 Not available 0 Not yet but 1 Complete and 2 2014 expected in time B. Total score (max. 14) 13 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection 2 no data & no 0 no data but 1 Collected & 2 ongoing plan to (re)start restart planned / delivery data delivery certain uncertain 2 - Age groups not covering the 0 All ages in most 1 all ages in all 2 full age-span of the hospitals hospitals - Injury 2 less than 0 At least home, 1 all injuries 2 categories leisure & school 2 - Outpatients none or strongly 0 biased toward 1 All HDs + all 2 biased toward HD but EDs HD corrected for IR - Completeness 2 more than 1 code 0 just one missing 1 all codes 2 of coding missing implemented (mechanism, injury type, body part) - Incidence rates 2 IR not available 0 only crude rate 1 standardized 2 or based on for age and catchment sex Geo-coverage 2 IR not available 0 Valid only for a 1 Valid at 2 region national level Sampling of 1 0 1 2 Just by rational Validated hospitals availability of sampling but no sample hospitals validation check - Hospital 2 none or below 0 Hardly above 1 well above 2 sample size advised minimum advised advised minimum (Table minimum 4.1) (Table 4.1) FDS data 2 none 0 Sample below 1 Sample above 2 FDS=MDS. minimum minimum About 10000 expected expected cases from 5 (<3000) (3000+) hospitals in 2014 C. Total score (max. 20) 19 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS 2 no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 data collection continue in 2016? - Improvement or 2 0 1 2 None or just draft in consultation No substantial maintenance improvements plan in place necessary for next years? - Legal basis for 0 No plans 0 Ongoing 1 In place or 2 MDS data substantial very likely
case definition (IDB & HDR or EDR) unclear consistent Scope of data collection Two or more “warning flags” Just one “warning flag” No “warning flag” 2 2 - FDS sample 2014 Not available 0 Not yet but expected 1 Complete and in time 2 2 B. Total score (max. 14) 13 C. Current system in place (2015) Score Comments Data collection ongoing no data & no plan to (re)start 0 no data but restart planned / data delivery uncertain 1 Collected & delivery certain 2 2 - Age groups not covering the full age-span 0 All ages in most of the hospitals 1 all ages in all hospitals 2 2 - Injury categories less than 0 At least home, leisure & school 1 all injuries 2 2 - Outpatients none or strongly biased toward HD 0 biased toward HD but corrected for IR 1 All HDs + all EDs 2 2 - Completeness of coding (mechanism, injury type, body part) more than 1 code missing 0 just one missing 1 all codes implemented 2 2 - Incidence rates IR not available 0 only crude rate or based on catchment 1 standardized for age and sex 2 2 Geo-coverage IR not available 0 Valid only for a region 1 Valid at national level 2 2 Sampling of hospitals Just by availability of hospitals 0 rational sampling but no validation check 1 Validated sample 2 1 - Hospital sample size none or below advised minimum 0 Hardly above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 1 well above advised minimum (Table 4.1) 2 2 FDS data none 0 Sample below minimum expected (<3000) 1 Sample above minimum expected (3000+) 2 2 FDS=MDS. About 10000 cases from 5 hospitals in 2014 C. Total score (max. 20) 19 D. Prospects for 2016-2017 Score Comments - Will the MDS data collection continue in 2016? no 0 Not secured yet 1 yes 2 2 - Improvement or maintenance plan in place for next years? None or just draft 0 in consultation 1 No substantial improvements necessary 2 2 - Legal basis for MDS data No plans 0 Ongoing substantial 1 In place or very likely 2 0