Delete Seems onerous, unnecessary and Review unjustified, The Permit particularly Holder shall, no given the later than six annual reports months following being prepared the 5th under anniversary of Condition 9. the commencement Little date of these reasoning Permits, have offered for this completed a condition. performance Suspect trying review of the to find a way operation of for Pahiatua ‘compulsory Wastewater review’. Treatment Plant. In particular, the Condition is performance also review shall ambiguous, evaluate: statement such as The discernible correlation of of the ANY conditions downstream of waterbody is Permits in entirely too avoiding, open ended. remedying It also reads to and cover those mitigating matters that any are part of adverse HRC SOE effects on monitoring. the Condition is not fair or The Permit reasonable. Holder’s record of with Permit conditions; The of the Permit
Review The Permit Holder shall, no later than six months following the 5th anniversary of the commencement date of these Permits, have completed a performance review of the operation of Pahiatua Wastewater Treatment Plant. In particular, the performance review shall evaluate: The of the conditions of Permits in avoiding, remedying and mitigating any adverse effects on the The Permit Holder’s record of with Permit conditions; The of the Permit Delete Seems onerous, unnecessary and unjustified, particularly given the annual reports being prepared under Condition 9. Little reasoning offered for this condition. Suspect trying to find a way for ‘compulsory review’. Condition is also ambiguous, statement such as discernible correlation of ANY downstream waterbody is entirely too open ended. It also reads to cover those matters that are part of HRC SOE monitoring. Condition is not fair or reasonable.