evidence people. frequency and one-tailed tests and 7 trials reported incidence of no significant effects of the of effect Alcohol drunkenness interventions for prevention reducing alcohol misuse. Outcome Cochrane measures Reporting quality of trials was poor. Database of related to Systematic psychological Reviews or awareness were deemed Children and as indirect and young adults therefore were Working age not considered. adults B. This Kaner EF, et al, Primary Brief interventions lowered Meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (enrolling Alcohol brief outcomes alcohol consumption. 7,619 participants) showed that intervention 2007. (1)Self or other When data were available participants receiving brief project has now is reports of by gender, the effect was intervention had lower alcohol trained 1200 Effectiveness supported drinking clear in men at one year of consumption than the control group health, social of brief by quantity, follow up, but not in after follow-up of one year or longer care and alcohol moderate frequency and women. (mean difference: -38 grams/week, community interventions to good intensity. Longer duration of 95% CI: -54 to -23), although there professionals quality in primary (2) Levels of counselling probably has was substantial heterogeneity across Wales. evidence care laboratory little additional effect. The between trials of its markers of benefits of brief intervention Take up varies populations. reduced alcohol were similar in Sub-group analysis (8 studies, 2,307 across Health
people. Alcohol prevention Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Children and young adults Working age adults frequency and incidence of drunkenness Outcome measures related to psychological or awareness were deemed as indirect and therefore were not considered. one-tailed tests and 7 trials reported no significant effects of the interventions for reducing alcohol misuse. Reporting quality of trials was poor. evidence of effect Kaner EF, et al, 2007. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Primary outcomes (1)Self or other reports of drinking quantity, frequency and intensity. (2) Levels of laboratory markers of reduced alcohol Brief interventions lowered alcohol consumption. When data were available by gender, the effect was clear in men at one year of follow up, but not in women. Longer duration of counselling probably has little additional effect. The benefits of brief intervention were similar in Meta-analysis of 22 RCTs (enrolling 7,619 participants) showed that participants receiving brief intervention had lower alcohol consumption than the control group after follow-up of one year or longer (mean difference: -38 grams/week, 95% CI: -54 to -23), although there was substantial heterogeneity between trials Sub-group analysis (8 studies, 2,307 Alcohol brief intervention project has now trained 1200 health, social care and community professionals across Wales. Take up varies across Health B. This is supported by moderate to good quality evidence of its