annexes a core issue of – differentiation. Our position in this regards is to ensure that no decision is taken on the framework for building in countries with economies in transition. Annual technical progress Decision on the annual No agreement is Failure to reach any The item was technical progress report of reached. There is an agreement on concluded and a COP report of the Paris the Paris Committee on agreement to continue PCCB. recommendation was Committee on Capacity-Building reached deliberations at SBI48. adopted. and forwarded to COP for adoption. Capacity-building under According to the Convention Maintain reference to Abolishing reference The item was and the Paris Agreement capacity for to annexures. concluded and a COP the Kyoto Protocol Capacity Building is for developing countries. recommendation was developing countries. It is adopted. important that the focus is not shifted in such a way that we lose reference to annexes a core issue of – differentiation. Our position in this regards is to ensure that no decision is taken on the framework for building in countries with economies in transition. Impact of the implementation of response measures: Technical work on No substantive The item was Improved Forum and work Address how the impact of economic technical work and concluded and draft programme the implementation of RM diversification and just support for capacity conclusions were pose challenges for transition must building for recommended for economic diversification in produce developing country adoption by the developing countries by parties with respect SBSTA/SBI.
annexes – a core issue of differentiation. Our position in this regards is to ensure that no decision is taken on the framework for in countries with economies in transition. Annual technical progress report of the Paris Committee on Decision on the annual technical progress report of the Paris Committee on Capacity-Building reached and forwarded to COP for adoption. No agreement is reached. There is an agreement to continue deliberations at SBI48. Failure to reach any agreement on PCCB. The item was concluded and a COP recommendation was adopted. Capacity-building under the Kyoto Protocol According to the Convention and the Paris Agreement Capacity Building is for developing countries. It is important that the focus is not shifted in such a way that we lose reference to annexes – a core issue of differentiation. Our position in this regards is to ensure that no decision is taken on the framework for in countries with economies in transition. Maintain reference to capacity building for developing countries. Abolishing reference to annexures. The item was concluded and a COP recommendation was adopted. Impact of the implementation of response measures: Improved Forum and work programme Address how the impact of the implementation of RM pose challenges for economic diversification in developing countries by Technical work on economic diversification and just transition must produce building No substantive technical work and support for capacity building for developing country parties with respect The item was concluded and draft conclusions were recommended for adoption by the SBSTA/SBI.