Yes No Preliminary CEQA Significance Determination Other Criteria – Is it obvious that the project SSIPE would exceed any of the CEQA 62. significance thresholds for Criteria Pollutants? Skip to 64 (10 ton-NOx/year, 10 ton-VOC/year, 27.4 tons ton-SOx/year, or 15 ton-PM10/year) Please forward the form Incomplete to Tec Svcs supv 63. Has the applicant completed the CEQA Information form? AND Send CEQA Information Discuss with your form to the applicant. supv & Tec Svcs supv. Skip to 78 Skip to 78 This a District is likely the Is the project occurring at an 64. EXISTING facility? Lead Agency for NEW FACILITY Skip to 66 CEQA 65. Has the applicant completed the CEQA Information form? Skip to 67 Skip to 70 Incomplete Please Has the applicant completed the CEQA Information form? Send CEQA Info form 66. forward the form to to the applicant. Tec Svcs supv Skip to 78 District is likely the Lead Agency for Did the applicant to 1 or more question on the CEQA answer “YES” District is likely a 67. CEQA Information form Section 1? Responsible Discuss with your Agency for CEQA supv & Tec Svcs supv. Skip to 78 Did the applicant to 1 or more question on the CEQA answer “YES” Discuss with your 68. Information form Section 2? supv & Tec Svcs supv. Skip to 78 determination, is this project likely to generate potential Project < District CEQA Per District’s Discuss with your signif. Thresholds. 69. public concern or is the facility identified on the list of facilities District’s Supv & Tec Svcs supv Use APR1010 with potential public concern ()? Skip to 78 CEQA Findings Skip to 78 Is it obvious that the project would result in an increase in heavy-duty Incomplete (HD) truck traffic to and from the facility of at least 47 new HD truck 70. Send CEQA Info one-way trips per day? (23 HD truck round trips per day) form to the applicant Is it obvious that the project would result in an increase in employment Incomplete 71. of 350 or more, new employees? Send CEQA Info form to the applicant
Preliminary CEQA Significance Determination – Other Criteria Yes No 62. Is it obvious that the project SSIPE would exceed any of the CEQA significance thresholds for Criteria Pollutants? (10 ton-NOx/year, 10 ton-VOC/year, 27.4 tons ton-SOx/year, or 15 ton-PM10/year) Skip to 64 63. Has the applicant completed the CEQA Information form? Please forward the form to Tec Svcs supv AND Discuss with your supv & Tec Svcs supv. Skip to 78 Incomplete Send CEQA Information form to the applicant. Skip to 78 64. Is the project occurring at an EXISTING facility? District is likely the Lead Agency for CEQA This a NEW FACILITY Skip to 66 65. Has the applicant completed the CEQA Information form? Skip to 67 Skip to 70 66. Has the applicant completed the CEQA Information form? Please forward the form to Tec Svcs supv Incomplete Send CEQA Info form to the applicant. Skip to 78 67. Did the applicant answer “YES” to 1 or more question on the CEQA Information form Section 1? District is likely a Responsible Agency for CEQA District is likely the Lead Agency for CEQA Discuss with your supv & Tec Svcs supv. Skip to 78 68. Did the applicant answer “YES” to 1 or more question on the CEQA Information form Section 2? Discuss with your supv & Tec Svcs supv. Skip to 78 69. Per District’s determination, is this project likely to generate potential public concern or is the facility identified on the District’s list of facilities with potential public concern ()? Discuss with your Supv & Tec Svcs supv Skip to 78 Project < District CEQA signif. Thresholds. Use APR1010 CEQA Findings Skip to 78 70. Is it obvious that the project would result in an increase in heavy-duty (HD) truck traffic to and from the facility of at least 47 new HD truck one-way trips per day? (23 HD truck round trips per day) Incomplete Send CEQA Info form to the applicant 71. Is it obvious that the project would result in an increase in employment of 350 or more, new employees? Incomplete Send CEQA Info form to the applicant