UAB School of Health Professions GROUP DISCUSSION REFLECTIONS RUBRIC Learning Exemplary Benchmark Milestone Insufficient Score Outcome 4 3 2 1* Clear and concise Exceptional work Critera met; minor Satisfactory work Unacceptable work writing errors Utilized higher Provides examples of Examples are supported Examples included Examples are not order thinking higher order critical by moderate order lower order critical provided, critical skills (Bloom’s thinking skills (creating & critical thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills are not taxonomy**) evaluating) (analyzing & applying) (understanding & demonstrated remembering) Defined and Exceptional work Comprehended main Satisfactory work Main topic(s) not expressed main defining and expressing topic(s) to discuss defining and expressing defined and main topic(s) main topic(s) expressed Reflected on Exceptional definitive Examples showed Examples provided lack Did not provide knowledge/skills skills/knowledge definitive evidence of skills/ examples of gained from class reflected skills/knowledge knowledge reflected knowledge/skills experience reflected reflected Utilized Examples demonstrated Examples demonstrated Examples lacked No examples of strategies exemplary problem-solving evidence of problem-solving realized from class strategies strategies strategies strategies experience demonstrated TOTAL= *Evaluators are encouraged to assign a zero to any work sample that does not attain sufficient performance. **Evaluators are encouraged to refer to Bloom’s Taxonomy. Exemplary Excellent/exceptional work. Exceeds expectations of the project. Superior. (100%) – Benchmark Understands scope and met initial criteria of project/document. 1-2 minor errors. (75%) – Milestone/Satisfactory Acceptable work, but demonstrated limited understanding of scope. Did not meet initial criteria of project/document. 3-5 – issues with project/document. Lacking. (50%) Insufficient Document/project completed, but not as requested. Work was unacceptable and lacking a demonstration of competence. (25%-0%) – Amended: 05-10-2017
UAB School of Health Professions GROUP DISCUSSION REFLECTIONS RUBRIC Learning Outcome Exemplary 4 Benchmark 3 Milestone 2 Insufficient 1* Score Clear and concise writing Exceptional work Critera met; minor errors Satisfactory work Unacceptable work Utilized higher order thinking skills (Bloom’s taxonomy**) Provides examples of higher order critical thinking skills (creating & evaluating) Examples are supported by moderate order critical thinking skills (analyzing & applying) Examples included lower order critical thinking skills (understanding & remembering) Examples are not provided, critical thinking skills are not demonstrated Defined and expressed main Exceptional work defining and expressing main topic(s) Comprehended main topic(s) to discuss Satisfactory work defining and expressing main topic(s) Main topic(s) not defined and expressed Reflected on knowledge/skills gained from class experience Exceptional definitive skills/knowledge reflected Examples showed definitive skills/knowledge reflected Examples provided lack evidence of skills/ knowledge reflected Did not provide examples of knowledge/skills reflected Utilized strategies realized from class experience Examples demonstrated exemplary strategies Examples demonstrated problem-solving strategies Examples lacked evidence of strategies No examples of problem-solving strategies demonstrated TOTAL= *Evaluators are encouraged to assign a zero to any work sample that does not attain sufficient performance. **Evaluators are encouraged to refer to Bloom’s Taxonomy. Exemplary – Excellent/exceptional work. Exceeds expectations of the project. Superior. (100%) Benchmark – Understands scope and met initial criteria of project/document. 1-2 minor errors. (75%) Milestone/Satisfactory – Acceptable work, but demonstrated limited understanding of scope. Did not meet initial criteria of project/document. 3-5 issues with project/document. Lacking. (50%) Insufficient – Document/project completed, but not as requested. Work was unacceptable and lacking a demonstration of competence. (25%-0%) Amended: 05-10-2017