3. Identify and theoretical orientation orientation but conceptualized theoretical orientation summarize a conceptualized the theoretical orientation with good evidence theoretical orientation OR was ambivalent on theory with some with reasonable and rationale for why and explain why it is a theoretical orientation inaccuracy. rationale as to why this treatment theory fit for this case. treatment theory is best is best for client and OR identified an OR rationale for to use with client and presenting issue. theoretical orientation identified theoretical presenting issue. but conceptualized orientation was very inaccurate weak. NOTES: Does not discuss any Simply states a need to Has reasonable idea on Coherently states 4. What assessment assessment process. assess client(s) without need to assess client for need to assess either tools (if any) would clear idea of what is “diagnostic for “diagnostic you use and why. being assessed clarification” and/or clarification” or “other “other issues”, with a issues present”, what OR simply states no need basic defined process, specific assessment to assess client without but may not have a tool(s) and process to any clear reason to this specific tool(s) in mind. be used. assertion. OR provides a AND speculates on reasonable rationale for what elevations would not using any formal be expected given assessment tools with client presentation. this client. OR provides a strong rationale for not using any formal assessment tools, possibly based on stated theoretical orientation. NOTES: Does not provide a Provides weak problem Problem statement Coherently states a 5. Formulate a problem statement for the statement on identifies concise one-sentence treatment plan: treatment plan. anger/disruptive anger/disruptive problem statement behavior. behavior as the that identifies the a. Problem Statement problem without problem (i.e., simple pithy providing evidence of (anger/disruptive statement of client issue problem. behavior) and and evidence for issue) evidence of problem.
3. Identify and summarize a theoretical orientation and explain why it is a fit for this case. theoretical orientation OR was ambivalent on theoretical orientation OR identified an theoretical orientation but conceptualized inaccurate orientation but conceptualized the theory with some inaccuracy. OR rationale for identified theoretical orientation was very weak. conceptualized theoretical orientation with reasonable rationale as to why treatment theory is best to use with client and presenting issue. theoretical orientation with good evidence and rationale for why this treatment theory is best for client and presenting issue. NOTES: 4. What assessment tools (if any) would you use and why. Does not discuss any assessment process. Simply states a need to assess client(s) without clear idea of what is being assessed OR simply states no need to assess client without any clear reason to this assertion. Has reasonable idea on need to assess client for “diagnostic clarification” and/or “other issues”, with a basic defined process, but may not have a specific tool(s) in mind. OR provides a reasonable rationale for not using any formal assessment tools with this client. Coherently states need to assess either for “diagnostic clarification” or “other issues present”, what specific assessment tool(s) and process to be used. AND speculates on what elevations would be expected given client presentation. OR provides a strong rationale for not using any formal assessment tools, possibly based on stated theoretical orientation. NOTES: 5. Formulate a treatment plan: a. Problem Statement (i.e., simple pithy statement of client issue and evidence for issue) Does not provide a problem statement for the treatment plan. Provides weak problem statement on anger/disruptive behavior. Problem statement identifies anger/disruptive behavior as the problem without providing evidence of problem. Coherently states a concise one-sentence problem statement that identifies the problem (anger/disruptive behavior) and evidence of problem.