Responsibility as responsiveness (norms and laws must adapt according to new knowledge) and accountability (actors need to give accounts of their actions) presupposes the good intentions of the actors (intentionalist). Table 3.3. Richard Owen et al. (2012, 2013a) Presuppositions/ parameters Intentionalist Schematizing Mentalist Participation/deliberation × × Owen et Ethical Tools (incrementalism) × × al. Norms/Law relation × Responsibility × Here, participation and deliberation are both intentionalist and schematizing because it is assumed that the inclusion of stakeholders and public dialogue will, as such (and owing to the good intentions of stakeholders), lead to more responsibility. The normative content of this conception rests on incrementalism (constant adaptation to a changing environment) and implies the good will of actors to adapt and that the application of a rule or a norm derives from the rule itself (intentionalist, schematizing). presupposes that the application of a rule or a norm is Compliance with law and norms logically deduced from the rule itself (schematizing). Responsibility as care for the future and as responsiveness (i.e. the flexibility and capacity to change research and innovation processes according to public values) presupposes the good intentions of the actors (intentionalist). Table 3.4. Alexeï Grinbaum and Christopher Groves (2013) Presuppositions/ parameters Intentionalist Schematizing Mentalist Participation/deliberation × × Grinbaum Ethical (virtue ethics) × × & Groves Norms/Law relation × × Responsibility × ×
Responsibility as responsiveness (norms and laws must adapt according to new knowledge) and accountability (actors need to give accounts of their actions) presupposes the good intentions of the actors (intentionalist). Table 3.3. Richard Owen et al. (2012, 2013a) Presuppositions/ parameters Intentionalist Schematizing Mentalist Owen et al. Participation/deliberation × × Ethical Tools (incrementalism) × × Norms/Law relation × Responsibility × Here, participation and deliberation are both intentionalist and schematizing because it is assumed that the inclusion of stakeholders and public dialogue will, as such (and owing to the good intentions of stakeholders), lead to more responsibility. The normative content of this conception rests on incrementalism (constant adaptation to a changing environment) and implies the good will of actors to adapt and that the application of a rule or a norm derives from the rule itself (intentionalist, schematizing). Compliance with law and norms presupposes that the application of a rule or a norm is logically deduced from the rule itself (schematizing). Responsibility as care for the future and as responsiveness (i.e. the flexibility and capacity to change research and innovation processes according to public values) presupposes the good intentions of the actors (intentionalist). Table 3.4. Alexeï Grinbaum and Christopher Groves (2013) Presuppositions/ parameters Intentionalist Schematizing Mentalist Grinbaum & Groves Participation/deliberation × × Ethical (virtue ethics) × × Norms/Law relation × × Responsibility × ×