land use the jurisdiction, rarely leads to In all cases, justify the rating by explaining what thresholds have regulations and and/or penalties. been used to decide if the enforcement is conducted regularly, non-compliance only sometimes or rarely. For example, because enforcement has “B leads to sometimes leads been conducted regularly at least 6 times a year in all penalties. to penalties. administrative regions (e.g. municipalities) for the last 5 years”, or because enforcement has been conducted rarely once or less per “C year over the last 5 years”. 1.4.4 Perceived It is uncommon Individuals or Individuals or 2 Guidance (please delete): This rating should be assessed through for individuals or organizations organizations confidential surveys of people outside government with direct to be free of organizations to sometimes make often make experience of seeking authorizations for land use activities. The corruption make undocumented undocumented justification should provide information on the number of people undocumented extra payments extra payments surveyed from different stakeholder groups and organizations and extra payments or bribes for or bribes for should explain how bias was avoided and confidentiality or bribes for authorizations authorizations maintained. Explain thresholds used for the ratings (e.g. B rating authorizations for activities for activities because corrupt practices are to occur but estimated to be less for activities affecting land affecting land than 80% of potential occurrences). affecting land use. use. use. 1.5 1.5.1 Sustainable Sustainable Sustainable 1 Sustainable landscape goals, landscape goals landscape goals Sustainable landscape including have been have not been landscape goals goals environmental, identified but not identified. are identified economic and for the entire social goals, have jurisdiction been identified and/or not for the entire endorsed by jurisdiction and government endorsed by and/or not government. including environmental, economic and social goals. 1.5.2 Developed Consultations Consultations is no 1 Guidance (please delete): Provide a reference for the analysis of were held with have been evidence of stakeholder groups used for the rating and evidence of stakeholder through a all groups of conducted with consultations groups that were invited to and participated in consultations. participatory stakeholders in some but not all with Evidence that stakeholder input influenced the goals may include a process the jurisdiction groups of stakeholders written statement or minutes of a meeting explaining of how (including all stakeholders about the goals. stakeholder input was taken into account or other relevant levels and the goals and/or documentation. relevant not meeting all departments of other conditions government, for A.
land use regulations and non-compliance leads to penalties. the jurisdiction, and/or only sometimes leads to penalties. rarely leads to penalties. In all cases, justify the rating by explaining what thresholds have been used to decide if the enforcement is conducted regularly, sometimes or rarely. For example, “B because enforcement has been conducted regularly at least 6 times a year in all regions (e.g. municipalities) for the last 5 years”, or “C because enforcement has been conducted rarely once or less per year over the last 5 years”. 1.4.4 Perceived to be free of corruption It is uncommon for individuals or organizations to make undocumented extra payments or bribes for authorizations for activities affecting land use. Individuals or organizations sometimes make undocumented extra payments or bribes for authorizations for activities affecting land use. Individuals or organizations often make undocumented extra payments or bribes for authorizations for activities affecting land use. 2 Guidance (please delete): This rating should be assessed through confidential surveys of people outside government with direct experience of seeking authorizations for land use activities. The justification should provide information on the number of people surveyed from different stakeholder groups and organizations and should explain how bias was avoided and confidentiality maintained. Explain thresholds used for the ratings (e.g. B rating because corrupt practices are to occur but estimated to be less than 80% of potential occurrences). 1.5 Sustainable landscape goals 1.5.1 Sustainable landscape goals are identified Sustainable landscape goals, including environmental, economic and social goals, have been identified for the entire jurisdiction and endorsed by government. Sustainable landscape goals have been identified but not for the entire jurisdiction and/or not endorsed by government and/or not including environmental, economic and social goals. Sustainable landscape goals have not been identified. 1 1.5.2 Developed through a participatory process Consultations were held with all groups of stakeholders in the jurisdiction (including all levels and relevant departments of government, Consultations have been conducted with some but not all groups of stakeholders the goals and/or not meeting all other conditions for A. is no evidence of consultations with stakeholders about the goals. 1 Guidance (please delete): Provide a reference for the analysis of stakeholder groups used for the rating and evidence of stakeholder groups that were invited to and participated in consultations. Evidence that stakeholder input influenced the goals may include a written statement or minutes of a meeting explaining of how stakeholder input was taken into account or other relevant documentation. administrative