C: Performance assessment framework Objective 1. Engage with Pacific regional and national health architecture to develop and implement effective regional health policies and services End of Delivery Strategy Intermediate outcomes Indicators 2013 Baseline Data Source Outcome (2017) Pacific Governments Coherent regional Annual Secretaries/Directors One Pacific Pacific Regional Health agree on, and oversight governance arrangements of Health Meetings held and Secretaries/Directors of Health Team assessment the delivery of a set of are developed and Health Ministers meeting meeting (April 2013) health sector functions implemented improved in effectiveness Current does not Pacific Plan that are delivered Mid-Term Review Pacific health policy provide a framework for regionally framework established effective regionalism in health Regional governance Health Ministers and Pacific Health Ministers Pacific Regional Health arrangements have Secretaries/Directors of Health Meeting does not link directly to Team assessment embedded links to PIFS Meetings linked to PIFS PIF architecture architecture architecture Regional health Number of health 52 regional health mechanisms, Academic assessment or architecture has fewer, mechanisms and meetings and 14 one-off meetings in a 12 commissioned more targeted meetings month period (2009) assessment from HRF and mechanisms Regional health services Country-level ownership Number and percentage of Some health schedules under Survey of Posts and and support are more of regional health Partnerships for Development Partnerships for Development health specialists transparent at country programs increases, (or other bilateral agreement) list regional programs, but no level, accountable to including demand for schedules that include regional detail provided PICs, and country results from health program expenditure No systematic approach to owned and driven implementing and targets including regional health Mid-Term Review organisations Number of Partnership for program inputs in country-level Development (or other) annual planning and performance talks that assess the discussions
C: Performance assessment framework Objective 1. Engage with Pacific regional and national health architecture to develop and implement effective regional health policies and services End of Delivery Strategy Outcome (2017) Intermediate outcomes Indicators 2013 Baseline Data Source Pacific Governments agree on, and oversight the delivery of a set of health sector functions that are delivered regionally Coherent regional governance arrangements are developed and implemented Annual Secretaries/Directors of Health Meetings held and Health Ministers meeting improved in effectiveness Pacific health policy framework established One Pacific Secretaries/Directors of Health meeting (April 2013) Current Pacific Plan does not provide a framework for effective regionalism in health Pacific Regional Health Team assessment Mid-Term Review Regional governance arrangements have embedded links to PIFS architecture Health Ministers and Secretaries/Directors of Health Meetings linked to PIFS architecture Pacific Health Ministers Meeting does not link directly to PIF architecture Pacific Regional Health Team assessment Regional health architecture has fewer, more targeted meetings and mechanisms Number of health mechanisms and meetings 52 regional health mechanisms, and 14 one-off meetings in a 12 month period (2009) Academic assessment or commissioned assessment from HRF Regional health services and support are more transparent at country level, accountable to PICs, and country owned and driven Country-level ownership of regional health programs increases, including demand for results from implementing organisations Number and percentage of Partnerships for Development (or other bilateral agreement) schedules that include regional health program expenditure and targets Number of Partnership for Development (or other) annual talks that assess the Some health schedules under Partnerships for Development list regional programs, but no detail provided No systematic approach to including regional health program inputs in country-level planning and performance discussions Survey of Posts and health specialists Mid-Term Review