3 In lower-mid quarter of 4 100 m hmax 50 m ≥ ≥ ranked results 5 6 In quarter of 7 50 m > hmax > 20 m ranked results 8 9 In highest quarter of 10 hmax 20 m ≤ ranked results Score = 26 [1] Derivatives for all lens systems that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating. Queensland Unconfined aquifer Propensity for Propensity for Wedge toe Propensity for change in SWI change in SWI relative to change in SWI extent due to extent due to change Scaled wedge toe, extraction extent due to recharge change in flows at the inland xT' bores [1] rise [2] [2] boundary [2] Weighting → 1 1 1 1 1 Rating ↓ In lowest quarter of In lowest quarter In lowest quarter of 1 xT' < 0.05 0 ranked results of ranked results ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 In lower-mid In quarter In lower-mid quarter 4 0.05 xT' 0.1 quarter of ranked ≤ ≤ of ranked results of ranked results results 5
3 4 100 m ≥ hmax ≥ 50 m In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5 6 7 50 m > hmax > 20 m In quarter of ranked results 8 9 10 hmax ≤ 20 m In highest quarter of ranked results Score = 26 [1] Derivatives for all lens systems that were assessed as part of the Math Analysis component of the NSWI project were ranked by magnitude. The ranking is used to determine the rating. Queensland Unconfined aquifer Scaled wedge toe, xT' Wedge toe relative to extraction bores [1] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to rise [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to recharge change [2] Propensity for change in SWI extent due to change in flows at the inland boundary [2] Weighting → Rating ↓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 xT' < 0.05 0 In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results In lowest quarter of ranked results 2 3 0 to 0.25 4 0.05 ≤ xT' ≤ 0.1 In lower-mid quarter of ranked results In quarter of ranked results In lower-mid quarter of ranked results 5