Working procedure of DG Gakkum and DG KSDAE, as well as MoEF and Ministry of Marine and Fisheries are developed. 0.2: Number of direct project 0 At least 1000 At least 2100 Continuing level of political will beneficiaries: personnel have personal have to support the project - Number of government agency staff improved knowledge improved intervention including enforcement officers who on IWT knowledge on IWT improved their knowledge and skills on (500m/500f); (1050m/1050f); Good relationship continues IWT due to the project (m/f) At least 300 local At least 600 local between enforcement agencies - Number of local people in project people in project people in project and key CSO partners demonstration areas benefiting from demo areas benefit demo areas benefit engagement in conservation activities, directly from project directly from Local people refers to member of Community-Based Partner of reduced HWC impacts and improved intervention project Forest Rangers (Masyarakat livelihoods (m/f) (150m/150f); intervention Mitra Polhut/MMP, CSOs, (300m/300f); villagers who act as collector and distributor of illegal wildlife products 0.3: Expert evaluation of IWT annual 4666 wild animals Increasing number Increasing number Improved legislation are seized from volume (number of animal specimens – of cases prosecuted of settled cases on (Component 1) and law 34 protected body parts or live animals) in Indonesia IWT enforcement (Component 2 and species based on the WCS IWT database 3) will allow the Indonesian government to decrease the Source: Lakip, level of unsustainable WT. Gakkum 2016 0.4: Number of individuals of IWT 2015: Tiger (5 >20% reduction >40% reduction Decrease in IWT will lead to flagship species (Sumatran Tiger, poached); from baseline from baseline decrease in poaching as a main Sumatran Rhinoceros, Sumatran Elephant (7 driver of species loss. Elephant, Black-crested macaque, Anoa poached); Rhino and Babirusa) killed by poachers annually (1 poached); in the 2 project demonstration areas Anoa (10 poached), Babirusa (12), Black-crested macaque (~200)
Working procedure of DG Gakkum and DG KSDAE, as well as MoEF and Ministry of Marine and Fisheries are developed. 0.2: Number of direct project beneficiaries: - Number of government agency staff including enforcement officers who improved their knowledge and skills on IWT due to the project (m/f) - Number of local people in project demonstration areas benefiting from engagement in conservation activities, reduced HWC impacts and improved livelihoods (m/f) 0 At least 1000 personnel have improved knowledge on IWT (500m/500f); At least 300 local people in project demo areas benefit directly from project intervention (150m/150f); At least 2100 personal have improved knowledge on IWT (1050m/1050f); At least 600 local people in project demo areas benefit directly from project intervention (300m/300f); Continuing level of political will to support the project intervention Good relationship continues between enforcement agencies and key CSO partners Local people refers to member of Community-Based Partner of Forest Rangers (Masyarakat Mitra Polhut/MMP, CSOs, villagers who act as collector and distributor of illegal wildlife products 0.3: Expert evaluation of IWT annual volume (number of animal specimens – body parts or live animals) in Indonesia based on the WCS IWT database 4666 wild animals are seized from 34 protected species Source: Lakip, Gakkum 2016 Increasing number of cases prosecuted Increasing number of settled cases on IWT Improved legislation (Component 1) and law enforcement (Component 2 and 3) will allow the Indonesian government to decrease the level of unsustainable WT. 0.4: Number of individuals of IWT flagship species (Sumatran Tiger, Sumatran Rhinoceros, Sumatran Elephant, Black-crested macaque, Anoa and Babirusa) killed by poachers annually in the 2 project demonstration areas 2015: Tiger (5 poached); Elephant (7 poached); Rhino (1 poached); Anoa (10 poached), Babirusa (12), Black-crested macaque (~200) >20% reduction from baseline >40% reduction from baseline Decrease in IWT will lead to decrease in poaching as a main driver of species loss.