Question should be scored as a Do health and safety 1 = No requirements add significant 5 if the project presents special 5 = Yes complexity to the health and safety considerations requirements for this project to make the project significantly more complex. I.e. such as the presence of extensive amounts 1 of asbestos or other hazardous materials including site contamination requiring remediation measures. If response is 5 then explain in the notes. 2. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RISKS (6 Questions) Follows NPMS and is in-line with How well and how clearly 1 = The project is critical the departmental and branch does the project align with the to the outcomes of department or agency’s the department, investment plans. mandate and outcomes? agency, or program. 3 = There is good alignment with an indirect contribution to 1 the outcomes of the department, agency, or program. 5 = There is a weak alignment with the outcomes, or the outcomes have not been established. Although all the RP Projects To what degree is this project 1 = The project is a critical considered to be of critical have shared resources and are priority: all resources importance to the Department necessary will be considered a normal priority, or Agency allocated to it. they are still considered critical 5 = The project is a to the management of the RP normal priority: portfolio. resources may be - shared with a project of equal or higher priority. If the decision is to make the project a critical priority, please include a rationale or justification for support.
Do health and safety requirements add significant complexity to the requirements for this project 1 = No 5 = Yes Question should be scored as a 5 if the project presents special health and safety considerations to make the project significantly more complex. I.e. such as the presence of extensive amounts of asbestos or other hazardous materials including site contamination requiring remediation measures. If response is 5 then explain in the notes. 1 2. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RISKS (6 Questions) How well and how clearly does the project align with the department or agency’s mandate and outcomes? 1 = The project is critical to the outcomes of the department, agency, or program. 3 = There is good alignment with an indirect contribution to the outcomes of the department, agency, or program. 5 = There is a weak alignment with the outcomes, or the outcomes have not been established. Follows NPMS and is in-line with the departmental and branch investment plans. 1 To what degree is this project considered to be of critical importance to the Department or Agency 1 = The project is a critical priority: all resources necessary will be allocated to it. 5 = The project is a normal priority: resources may be shared with a project of equal or higher priority. Although all the RP Projects have shared resources and are considered a normal priority, they are still considered critical to the management of the RP portfolio. If the decision is to make the project a critical priority, please include a rationale or justification for support. -