Group members encouraged and participated in experimentation using a range of team-based approaches. Group members contributed toward team direction, responded to critical feedback and worked collaboratively as member of a team. Group members collaborated confidently with others in the team and contributed ideas generously to the brief response. Group members observed and recorded work activities clearly and logically. Group members observed and evaluated individual and team work and presented objective observations to improve their own working methods and those of others. Pass Group members communicate clearly using visual and written modes of expression. 50 – 64% Research skills and methodology were applied to a satisfactory level. Knowledge of sustainability is applied to development of responses to the brief. Workable solutions are proposed in response to the brief. Group members worked collaboratively as member of a team. Group members experimented with a range of team-based approaches to responding to the brief. Group members responded to requests, direction and critical feedback from lecturers and tutors. Group members observed and recorded their work activities clearly and logically. Group members observed and evaluated individual and team work performance objectively. Fail Communication/reporting is insufficient, superficial or inadequate. <50% Theory, skills and knowledge of research methodology are not understood or applied. The response to the brief is inadequate or incomplete. Group members have not engaged with a team-based approach. Group members did not follow directions, respond to critical feedback and/or worked collaboratively as a team. Assessment Event 4 - Written examination - Weighting 40% Learning Outcomes: A, B, C, D, E Graduate Attributes: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
Group members encouraged and participated in experimentation using a range of team-based approaches. Group members contributed toward team direction, responded to critical feedback and worked collaboratively as member of a team. Group members collaborated confidently with others in the team and contributed ideas generously to the brief response. Group members observed and recorded work activities clearly and logically. Group members observed and evaluated individual and team work and presented objective observations to improve their own working methods and those of others. Pass 50 – 64% Group members communicate clearly using visual and written modes of expression. Research skills and methodology were applied to a satisfactory level. Knowledge of sustainability is applied to development of responses to the brief. Workable solutions are proposed in response to the brief. Group members worked collaboratively as member of a team. Group members experimented with a range of team-based approaches to responding to the brief. Group members responded to requests, direction and critical feedback from lecturers and tutors. Group members observed and recorded their work activities clearly and logically. Group members observed and evaluated individual and team work performance objectively. Fail <50% Communication/reporting is insufficient, superficial or inadequate. Theory, skills and knowledge of research methodology are not understood or applied. The response to the brief is inadequate or incomplete. Group members have not engaged with a team-based approach. Group members did not follow directions, respond to critical feedback and/or worked collaboratively as a team. Assessment Event 4 - Written examination - Weighting 40% Learning Outcomes: A, B, C, D, E Graduate Attributes: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7