Appendix 16 - Overall Evaluation Committee Scoring Record Date: Time: Project Title: Project Reference no: Assessment Issues raised by Objective Weighting Criteria Evaluation Committee Score Compatibility with Do the project proposals meet LAG Local the criteria set out in the LAG LDS 20 Development for the relevant Theme and Strategy Sub-theme? Is the product innovative in its Innovation nature or does it displace 15 existing enterprises? Does the promoter have the Promoter Training/skills, track record or 20 experience experience to deliver? Are the project costs justifiable (reasonableness of costs) Financial Viability and / is adequate funding available 20 to co-fund the project? Does Deadweight arise? Is the project viable and will the Sustainability service continue to be 10 delivered? Does the proposal target a Requirement specific need or address a 15 specific gap in the market? Total 100 N.B. Projects must receive a minimum score of 65% prior to being recommended for approval. Has the potential level of deadweight been assessed for this project? YES / NO i.e. would the project proceed without LEADER funding? YES / NO Recommendations of the Evaluation Committee: Signature of Committee Chair Date:
Appendix 16 - Overall Evaluation Committee Scoring Record Date: Time: Project Title: Project Reference no: Assessment Criteria Objective Issues raised by Evaluation Committee Weighting Score Compatibility with LAG Local Development Strategy Do the project proposals meet the criteria set out in the LAG LDS for the relevant Theme and Sub-theme? 20 Innovation Is the product innovative in its nature or does it displace existing enterprises? 15 Promoter experience Does the promoter have the Training/skills, track record or experience to deliver? 20 Financial Viability Are the project costs justifiable (reasonableness of costs) and / is adequate funding available to co-fund the project? Does Deadweight arise? 20 Sustainability Is the project viable and will the service continue to be delivered? 10 Requirement Does the proposal target a specific need or address a specific gap in the market? 15 Total 100 N.B. Projects must receive a minimum score of 65% prior to being recommended for approval. Has the potential level of deadweight been assessed for this project? YES / NO i.e. would the project proceed without LEADER funding? YES / NO Recommendations of the Evaluation Committee: Signature of Committee Chair Date: