watersheds. When structuring strategies, watersheds should consider how they want to tell the story (see Nooksack example). Watershed Specific Technical and Policy Reviews The RITT was asked to respond to the following questions: I. Consistency and Sequencing of Project and Activity List: Is the sequence of actions identified in the 3YWP consistent with the current hypotheses and strategies as identified in the watershed’s M&AM Framework? (if applicable) Is the sequence of actions identified in the 3YWP consistent with the current hypotheses and strategies as identified in strategies for other species, including steelhead? Are actions sequenced and timed appropriately for the current stage of implementation? II. Monitoring and Adaptive Management Framework Review Are projects and activities appropriately linked to strategies within the Framework? Are the indicators selected for viability, pressures and effectiveness appropriate for the watershed? What are the major technical gaps and challenges the watershed is likely to experience in developing and implementing their Monitoring and Adaptive Management Framework and subsequent Plan? What are potential solutions to overcoming these challenges? What regional technical support do you anticipate is needed for this watershed to succeed with implementing their Monitoring and Adaptive Management Framework and subsequent Plan?
watersheds. When structuring strategies, watersheds should consider how they want to tell the story (see Nooksack example). Watershed Specific Technical and Policy Reviews The RITT was asked to respond to the following questions: I. Consistency and Sequencing of Project and Activity List: Is the sequence of actions identified in the 3YWP consistent with the current hypotheses and strategies as identified in the watershed’s M&AM Framework? (if applicable) Is the sequence of actions identified in the 3YWP consistent with the current hypotheses and strategies as identified in strategies for other species, including steelhead? Are actions sequenced and timed appropriately for the current stage of implementation? II. Monitoring and Adaptive Management Framework Review Are projects and activities appropriately linked to strategies within the Framework? Are the indicators selected for viability, pressures and effectiveness appropriate for the watershed? What are the major technical gaps and challenges the watershed is likely to experience in developing and implementing their Monitoring and Adaptive Management Framework and subsequent Plan? What are potential solutions to overcoming these challenges? What regional technical support do you anticipate is needed for this watershed to succeed with implementing their Monitoring and Adaptive Management Framework and subsequent Plan?