Build in additional systems to generate feedback loops for affected 23 Agenda populations Need for more operational guideline on AAP how to do it? GCCU – Support systematic roll out of TA at country level GCC 24 Humanitarian Acknowledge capacity of certain organisations to actually provide Programme services: We need integrated decision on matrix between clusters, & showing which organisation can work on what in specific contexts: (e.g. thematically on cholera, displacement, drought etc). coordination the 3W or 4W so that it reflects inter-cluster approach + create GCC – an accountability structure between clusters 25 Cluster Need to out criteria for cluster de and re-activation. GCCU Coordination Ensure that we are transitioning cluster issues to sectors when RRTs GCC Reference leave Module 26 NA tools & Share data for analysis with partners and clusters rather than only NA focal Best practices sharing conclusions and recommendations points 27 Coordinated All UNICEF-led clusters/partners to be trained in the same principles, GCCU /NA Needs processes and methodologies of the assessments (MIRA) focal Assessment points RRTs & CCs to understand what is expected from and how to GCCU /NA contribute to the MIRA approach need to make the engagement – focal house’ ‘in points Identify operational guidance for MIRA and shared GCCs and experiences/suggestions from RRTs in EoMs Explore possibility of inter-cluster assessment teams GCCU /NA focal points Use the web-platform to engage and inform on MIRA across clusters All 28 Assessments Keep assessment tool simple (KISS) but RRTs to contribute to RRTs, GCCs – informing strengthen analysis of data to inform humanitarian strategies better strategies (CAPs, CHAPs, Flash Appeals, strategic statements etc) Other Outcomes of the Retreat The long list of recommendations was a substantial achievement of the retreat. However in the last session other outcomes were also expressed by RRT members as well as stand-by partners and cluster coordinators, some of which are listed below: Getting the RRTs together with donors and partners understanding the others’ procedures, – policies, etc. Developing good relationships with others.
23 Agenda Build in additional systems to generate feedback loops for affected populations Need for more operational guideline on AAP – how to do it? GCCU Support systematic roll out of TA at country level GCC 24 Humanitarian Programme & coordination Acknowledge capacity of certain organisations to actually provide services: We need integrated decision on matrix between clusters, showing which organisation can work on what in specific contexts: (e.g. thematically on cholera, displacement, drought etc). the 3W or 4W – so that it reflects inter-cluster approach + create an accountability structure between clusters GCC 25 Cluster Coordination Reference Module Need to out criteria for cluster de and re-activation. GCCU Ensure that we are transitioning cluster issues to sectors when RRTs leave GCC 26 NA tools & Best practices Share data for analysis with partners and clusters rather than only sharing conclusions and recommendations NA focal points 27 Coordinated Needs Assessment All UNICEF-led clusters/partners to be trained in the same principles, processes and methodologies of the assessments (MIRA) GCCU /NA focal points RRTs & CCs to understand what is expected from and how to contribute to the MIRA approach – need to make the engagement ‘in house’ GCCU /NA focal points Identify operational guidance for MIRA and shared experiences/suggestions from GCCs and RRTs in EoMs Explore possibility of inter-cluster assessment teams GCCU /NA focal points Use the web-platform to engage and inform on MIRA across clusters All 28 Assessments informing strategies Keep assessment tool simple (KISS) – but RRTs to contribute to strengthen analysis of data to inform humanitarian strategies better (CAPs, CHAPs, Flash Appeals, strategic statements etc) RRTs, GCCs Other Outcomes of the Retreat The long list of recommendations was a substantial achievement of the retreat. However in the last session other outcomes were also expressed by RRT members as well as stand-by partners and cluster coordinators, some of which are listed below: Getting the RRTs together with donors and partners – understanding the others’ procedures, policies, etc. Developing good relationships with others.