The results are presented as two graphs. Firstly Revenue Recovery Rates are shown with a percentage shown highlighted by the red line. This is separated out into IP and Non-IP. Secondly, the same effects are shown for exit. 1st of two analysis slides 2ND of two analysis slides What the results show In terms of Modification 0621, the results show how Revenue Recovery Rates increased as a result of keeping the OC Rate.…. (from NG) Increase of 3% for IP for entry, 22% for Non-IP. Increase of 70% for IP for exit, 9% for Non-IP. Workgroup response Workgroup Participants differed in view of whether the percentage changes (which were all increases) constituted a distortion. Those who favoured keeping the OC rate tended to feel the distortion was appropriate; those who did not favour keeping the OC rate suggested it might constitute an undue distortion. Number 6 Difference between the Transitional and Enduring Periods Aim To assess the impact of the FCC change between Transition and Enduring period by keeping all other variables the same. Graphs show the Firm and Combined (Firm + Revenue Recovery) rates for transitional and enduring period Assumptions This analysis used the 2019/20 Transitional parameters from CWD model (i.e. Model reset to transitional period) for both scenarios Obligated levels have been used for the transitional FCC. The revenue recovery rates for the transitional period have been taken from the anticipated revenue recovery sheets using the anticipated booking scenario and excluding Optional Charge.
The results are presented as two graphs. Firstly Revenue Recovery Rates are shown with a percentage shown highlighted by the red line. This is separated out into IP and Non-IP. Secondly, the same effects are shown for exit. 1st of two analysis slides 2ND of two analysis slides What the results show In terms of Modification 0621, the results show how Revenue Recovery Rates increased as a result of keeping the OC Rate.…. (from NG) Increase of 3% for IP for entry, 22% for Non-IP. Increase of 70% for IP for exit, 9% for Non-IP. Workgroup response Workgroup Participants differed in view of whether the percentage changes (which were all increases) constituted a distortion. Those who favoured keeping the OC rate tended to feel the distortion was appropriate; those who did not favour keeping the OC rate suggested it might constitute an undue distortion. Number 6 Difference between the Transitional and Enduring Periods Aim To assess the impact of the FCC change between Transition and Enduring period by keeping all other variables the same. Graphs show the Firm and Combined (Firm + Revenue Recovery) rates for transitional and enduring period Assumptions This analysis used the 2019/20 Transitional parameters from CWD model (i.e. Model reset to transitional period) for both scenarios Obligated levels have been used for the transitional FCC. The revenue recovery rates for the transitional period have been taken from the anticipated revenue recovery sheets using the anticipated booking scenario and excluding Optional Charge.