Tracking Number: RFC 005-B09 SWG RFC Resolution Categories Accepts Evaluator Submission Document Accepts with Modifications X Accepts as Future Work Rejects with Reasons RFC submission is a comment or question with no call for Candidate Standard modification Requirement Type Section Criticality Number Volker Coors, Fraunhofer IGD / HFT Stuttgart 15-113 Volume 1 115 5.7.1.2.7.1 normal RFC Comment as submitted by Evaluator OGC CDB SWG Response / Comment / Modifications / Reasons - The issues with the representation of attributes would be The SWG accepts as Future Work investigation of alternate solved, if GML / CityGML would be used instead of Shapefiles. encodings for vector data, including the use of other OGC standards including CityGML. SWG RFC Resolution Categories X Accepts Accepts with Modifications Accepts as Future Work
SWG RFC Resolution Categories Accepts Accepts with Modifications X Accepts as Future Work Rejects with Reasons RFC submission is a comment or question with no call for Candidate Standard modification Tracking Number: RFC 005-B09 Evaluator Submission Document Requirement Type Section Number Criticality Volker Coors, Fraunhofer IGD / HFT Stuttgart 15-113 Volume 1 115 5.7.1.2.7.1 normal RFC Comment as submitted by Evaluator OGC CDB SWG Response / Comment / Modifications / Reasons - The issues with the representation of attributes would be solved, if GML / CityGML would be used instead of Shapefiles. The SWG accepts as Future Work investigation of alternate encodings for vector data, including the use of other OGC standards including CityGML. SWG RFC Resolution Categories X Accepts Accepts with Modifications Accepts as Future Work