HDFS 414 Summary of Function Rubric Student Points 0-1 2-3 4-5 STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS More than one element is missing Operational definition is missing Operational Definition is in a from the assignment from the data sheets or is not in header in the summary and is in terms observable terms Summary of function is cut and pasted from previous summaries ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: Assessments are compared as they relate to the data collected (i.e., No comparison of the three 1-2 statements are not in patterns and contradictions in the assessments are presented, as they observable terms (with the relate to the data collected exception of the hypothesis of data collected) function) Summary of the data and graphing No hypothesis of function is is at least 4 paragraphs but not presented 1-2 Explanatory fictions are used more than 2-3 pages. in the summary (with the More than two statements contain exception of the hypothesis of Summary is in observable terms explanatory observable terms function) and passes the “Dead Man Test” Summary is too short/too long All conclusions are qualified by statements such as “I observed” or “it seems to be” SUMMARY OF WHAT THE DATA SHOW 0-1 2-3 4-5 Summary is missing from the 1-2 statements contain 1 paragraph discusses patterns assignment explanatory and similarities in findings among terms the MAS or FAI, ABC, and data At least two elements are missing collection from the assignment Summary reflects some of the data collected, but the analysis is 1 paragraph discusses Summary does not in any way incomplete differences/contradiction in the reflect the assessment(s) data collected across all three data conducted Conclusions are qualified by collection methods (MAS or FAI, statements such as “I observed” or Suggests causes related to internal “it seems to be” ABC, and data collection) events The word “data” is used as a Factors that might influence the Conclusion ends with “this will data collection are discussed (e.g., singular noun help me in future classrooms” time of day, physiological factors, Discussion “sticks to the data” as Summary is merely a reflection on bias, etc..) opposed to a reflection on the the process Summary avoids causes related to process internal events (explanatory fictions)
HDFS 414 Summary of Function Rubric Student Points 0-1 2-3 4-5 STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS More than one element is missing from the assignment Summary of function is cut and pasted from previous summaries No comparison of the three assessments are presented, as they relate to the data collected No hypothesis of function is presented More than two statements contain explanatory terms Operational definition is missing from the data sheets or is not in observable terms ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 1-2 statements are not in observable terms (with the exception of the hypothesis of function) 1-2 Explanatory fictions are used in the summary (with the exception of the hypothesis of function) Summary is too short/too long Operational Definition is in a header in the summary and is in observable terms Assessments are compared as they relate to the data collected (i.e., patterns and contradictions in the data collected) Summary of the data and graphing is at least 4 paragraphs but not more than 2-3 pages. Summary is in observable terms and passes the “Dead Man Test” All conclusions are qualified by statements such as “I observed” or “it seems to be” SUMMARY OF WHAT THE DATA SHOW 0-1 2-3 4-5 Summary is missing from the assignment At least two elements are missing from the assignment Summary does not in any way reflect the assessment(s) conducted Suggests causes related to internal events Conclusion ends with “this will help me in future classrooms” Summary is merely a reflection on the process 1-2 statements contain explanatory terms Summary reflects some of the data collected, but the analysis is incomplete Conclusions are qualified by statements such as “I observed” or “it seems to be” The word “data” is used as a singular noun Discussion “sticks to the data” as opposed to a reflection on the process 1 paragraph discusses patterns and similarities in findings among the MAS or FAI, ABC, and data collection 1 paragraph discusses differences/contradiction in the data collected across all three data collection methods (MAS or FAI, ABC, and data collection) Factors that might influence the data collection are discussed (e.g., time of day, physiological factors, bias, etc..) Summary avoids causes related to internal events (explanatory fictions)