PRI Staff Present Mark Aubele Susan Frailey Jim Lewis Julia Markardt Safety Information was reviewed. Reviewed Code of and Meeting Conduct Ethics (Ref: Attendees’ Guide) Presented the Antitrust Video (only @ the first open and first closed meeting of the week for each Task Group) Reviewed Agenda DELEGATION STATUS – Both Susan and Julia have fallen below 90% for Task Group (TG) concurrence. Root cause determined to be a combination of several new auditors and unusual number of findings from initial audits. Task Group has determined no corrective action is required at this time and will continue to monitor concurrence. SUBSCRIBER DISCUSSION – Technical discussions associated with audit packages Scott Meyer made a motion and seconded by Bill Cardinal to approve a three-month extension of audit 163610 due to difficulties scheduling an auditor. Motion passed. Task Group reviewed Supplier appeal of audit 162352 NCR 3. Task Group feels the Supplier reasoning for lack of hardware impact is non-persuasive. Additionally, finding raises questions concerning the and review of test results. Appeal denied. Supplier’s process control methodology Task Group reviewed Supplier appeal of audit 162352 NCR 1. Appeal is denied. Although corporate procedure was revised several weeks earlier, the auditor was not presented with the evidence during the audit. Task Group reviewed Supplier appeal of failure audit 169755. Appeal is denied based on compliance to the checklist has not been met. Automotive Class 3 work is acceptable for compliance. Supplier will be audited again using the automotive work as evidence. Junta Okutsu presented results of a Honeywell audit which took place after the ETG audit 163048. ACTION ITEM: Gilbert Shelby/AC7119 Sub team to review critical test criteria per J-STD-003 and IPC-9552. Determine if checklist or handbook needs update or clarification. (Due Date: Completed during meeting Subscribers met with a Supplier in response to an auditor being driven to a second location although audit indicated single location. Supplier had moved receiving and storage to a warehouse located nearby since the previous audit. Although second facility meets the satellite definition, Task Group preference is to continue to regard as a single facility. Regarding audit 165723 and were raised during the audit. The Task 169755, many Qualified No’s Group stance is not appropriate for procedural questions. Topic to be Qualified No’s are introduced during new business to the entire Task Group.
PRI Staff Present Mark Aubele Susan Frailey Jim Lewis Julia Markardt Safety Information was reviewed. Reviewed Code of Ethics (Ref: Attendees’ Guide) and Meeting Conduct Presented the Antitrust Video (only @ the first open and first closed meeting of the week for each Task Group) Reviewed Agenda DELEGATION STATUS – Both Susan and Julia have fallen below 90% for Task Group (TG) concurrence. Root cause determined to be a combination of several new auditors and unusual number of findings from initial audits. Task Group has determined no corrective action is required at this time and will continue to monitor concurrence. SUBSCRIBER DISCUSSION – Technical discussions associated with audit packages Scott Meyer made a motion and seconded by Bill Cardinal to approve a three-month extension of audit 163610 due to difficulties scheduling an auditor. Motion passed. Task Group reviewed Supplier appeal of audit 162352 NCR 3. Task Group feels the Supplier reasoning for lack of hardware impact is non-persuasive. Additionally, finding raises questions concerning the Supplier’s process control methodology and review of test results. Appeal denied. Task Group reviewed Supplier appeal of audit 162352 NCR 1. Appeal is denied. Although corporate procedure was revised several weeks earlier, the auditor was not presented with the evidence during the audit. Task Group reviewed Supplier appeal of failure audit 169755. Appeal is denied based on compliance to the checklist has not been met. Automotive Class 3 work is acceptable for compliance. Supplier will be audited again using the automotive work as evidence. Junta Okutsu presented results of a Honeywell audit which took place after the ETG audit 163048. ACTION ITEM: Gilbert Shelby/AC7119 Sub team to review critical test criteria per J-STD-003 and IPC-9552. Determine if checklist or handbook needs update or clarification. (Due Date: Completed during meeting Subscribers met with a Supplier in response to an auditor being driven to a second location although audit indicated single location. Supplier had moved receiving and storage to a warehouse located nearby since the previous audit. Although second facility meets the satellite definition, Task Group preference is to continue to regard as a single facility. Regarding audit 165723 and 169755, many Qualified No’s were raised during the audit. The Task Group stance is Qualified No’s are not appropriate for procedural questions. Topic to be introduced during new business to the entire Task Group.