future EU injury availability of strongly information internal interested projects? resources D. Total score (max. 10) 3 Summary Successful pilot implementation in 2012/2013 could not be sustained. Main shortcoming is the lack of governmental Implementation support. Assessment Signatures Function Place, date Name Signature National IDB data OK for JAMIE final Cluj-Napoca Diana Rus administrator score card June 2014 Vienna, 16 October BRIDGE-Health IDB Rupert Kisser OK 2015 National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: SWEDEN August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as 2 not yet 0 just since start 1 already before 2 observer or full of member (2015) - Participation 2 2 or less of the 0 3-4 of the 1 at least 5 2 level in past seven meetings meetings meetings five years attended attended attended - Government 2 No or only weak 0 only for duration 1 for longer 2 endorsement support of term perspective for endorsement participation - Responsive to 2 only after many 0 after 1 or 2 1 within 2 information reminders/calls reminders deadline requests of A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered 2 none 0 data delivered 1 data delivered 2 in past five for just one year for two or years more years
future EU injury information projects? availability of internal resources strongly interested D. Total score (max. 10) 3 Summary Implementation Assessment Successful pilot implementation in 2012/2013 could not be sustained. Main shortcoming is the lack of governmental support. Signatures Function Place, date Name Signature National IDB data administrator Cluj-Napoca Diana Rus OK for JAMIE final score card June 2014 BRIDGE-Health IDB Vienna, 16 October 2015 Rupert Kisser OK National IDB Implementation Score Card Report Country: SWEDEN August 2015 A. Participation in EU-data exchange Score Comments - Membership as observer or full member not yet 0 just since start of (2015) 1 already before 2 2 - Participation level in past five years 2 or less of the seven meetings attended 0 3-4 of the meetings attended 1 at least 5 meetings attended 2 2 - Government endorsement perspective for No or only weak support 0 only for duration of 1 for longer term endorsement 2 2 - Responsive to information requests of only after many reminders/calls 0 after 1 or 2 reminders 1 within deadline 2 2 A. Total score (max. 8) 8 B. Data delivery (up to 2014) Score Comments - Data delivered in past five years none 0 data delivered for just one year 1 data delivered for two or more years 2 2 participation