Yr1: Background paper that 1.2.2 advises the appropriateness of Harvest Control management. Rules and tools Well-defined harvest YR2: agreement on changes to control rules are in the TAC management place that are arrangements if necessary. consistent with the harvest strategy and YR3: Lemon sole advice ensure that the provided by ICES exploitation rate is reduced as limit YR4: implementation of single reference points are species TAC (as part of approached. HCR and 2.2.1 Secondary Catch composition Data analysis and SFSAG (on MMO data NSAC members Overall timescale 6 months – species outcomes Review. interpretation. behalf of provider Yr1: steering Main secondary Refine UoA Output expected MSC – Delivery of review report. group) – species are catch to: interpretation highly data likely to be above composition of standard define request Yr2: Determine recommendation biologically based limits (TR1/TR2 split UoAs for and next based on Yr 1 OR may enable TR1 fast track outputs If below biologically to progress, MSC Clarify based limits, there is Angler species responsible Nephrops either evidence of split may reduce for status per recovery or a % below main) exploring FU and demonstrably explore funding - likely effective partial Nephrops status complete strategy in place such (P2 stocks route that the UoA does not required to be (RBF?) hinder recovery and above Blim) Provide rebuilding. Assess AND Nephrops FU
1.2.2 Harvest Control Rules and tools Well-defined harvest control rules are in place that are consistent with the harvest strategy and ensure that the exploitation rate is reduced as limit reference points are approached. Yr1: Background paper that advises the appropriateness of management. YR2: agreement on changes to the TAC management arrangements if necessary. YR3: Lemon sole advice provided by ICES YR4: implementation of single species TAC (as part of HCR and 2.2.1 Secondary species outcomes Main secondary species are highly likely to be above biologically based limits OR If below biologically based limits, there is either evidence of recovery or a demonstrably effective partial strategy in place such that the UoA does not hinder recovery and rebuilding. AND Catch composition Review. Refine UoA catch composition (TR1/TR2 split may enable TR1 to progress, Angler species split may reduce % below main) explore Nephrops status (P2 stocks required to be above Blim) Assess Nephrops FU Data analysis and interpretation. Output expected to: define UoAs for fast track Clarify Nephrops status per FU and likely route (RBF?) Provide SFSAG (on behalf of steering group) – data request MSC responsible for exploring funding - complete MMO – data provider MSC – interpretation of standard NSAC members Overall timescale 6 months Yr1: Delivery of review report. Yr2: Determine recommendation and next based on Yr 1 outputs