Table of Contents 3 Should Property Rights Be Granted In The Moon? 4 Yanner v. Eaton (1999) Australia HC (p. 12) (Fauna Act) 4 Harrison v. Carswell (1976) SCC (p. 19) (picketing outside of shopping mall) 4 & 5 Ziff Irreversibility of Commodification” 5 “The McCallum Rights to Property: PEI” 1999 5 “Sacred Moore v The Regents of the University of California (1990, California SC) pg 60 (are cells property) 6 JCM v ANA (2012, BCSC) (are straws property) 7 7 Anishinabek Nation J Borrows 7 – Nanabush v Deer, Wolf et al. 7 Gitxan Nation Richard Overstall 8 – Feudal Europe J cribbet & cw johnson 8 – & 9 J Waldron and the Issue of Freedom” (pg 119) 9 “Homelessness RC Ellickson Chronic Misconduct in City Spaces” (pg 123) 9 “Controlling Victoria (City) v. Adams (2008, BCSC) 10 11 Ziff Liberties” (pg 140) 11 “Taking Constructive Expropriation/Regulatory Takings 11 Marine Real Estate Ltd v Nova Scotia (AG) (1999, NSCA) pg 152 (De facto expropriation test) 11 CPR v City of Vancouver (2006, SCC) pg 163 12 13 13 v Alberta Power Ltd (1988, ABCA) pg 173 (What is Trespass) 13 Ford v Zelman (2005, BCPC) 13 Note: Crane Swing Easements 13 14 Mineral Rights 14 Op-Ed Article: Dawn Hoogeveen mining rules trump privacy in BC” 15 “Outdated - LAND 15 Conventional Line Doctrine 15 Robertson v Wallace (2000, QB) pg 204 (failed Conventional line doctrine test) 15 of Support 15 - WATER 16 Presumption: Ad medium filum aquae the centre thread of the stream” 16 – “To R v Nikal (1996, SCC) pg 213 17 Law of Accretion 17 18 (IP) 18 Property Rights in Ideas 18 Desney v Wilder (1956) can’t be property) 18 Property Rights in Information 19 International News Service v Associated Press (1918, US) (information is not protected) 19 CCH Canadian et al v. LSUC (2004, SCC) 19 20 –
Table of Contents 3 Should Property Rights Be Granted In The Moon? 4 Yanner v. Eaton (1999) Australia HC (p. 12) (Fauna Act) 4 Harrison v. Carswell (1976) SCC (p. 19) (picketing outside of shopping mall) 4 & 5 Ziff “The Irreversibility of Commodification” 5 McCallum “Sacred Rights to Property: PEI” 1999 5 Moore v The Regents of the University of California (1990, California SC) pg 60 (are cells property) 6 JCM v ANA (2012, BCSC) (are straws property) 7 7 Anishinabek Nation – J Borrows 7 Nanabush v Deer, Wolf et al. 7 Gitxan Nation – Richard Overstall 8 Feudal Europe – J cribbet & cw johnson 8 & 9 J Waldron “Homelessness and the Issue of Freedom” (pg 119) 9 RC Ellickson “Controlling Chronic Misconduct in City Spaces” (pg 123) 9 Victoria (City) v. Adams (2008, BCSC) 10 11 Ziff “Taking Liberties” (pg 140) 11 Constructive Expropriation/Regulatory Takings 11 Marine Real Estate Ltd v Nova Scotia (AG) (1999, NSCA) pg 152 (De facto expropriation test) 11 CPR v City of Vancouver (2006, SCC) pg 163 12 13 13 v Alberta Power Ltd (1988, ABCA) pg 173 (What is Trespass) 13 Ford v Zelman (2005, BCPC) 13 Note: Crane Swing Easements 13 14 Mineral Rights 14 Op-Ed Article: Dawn Hoogeveen “Outdated mining rules trump privacy in BC” 15 - LAND 15 Conventional Line Doctrine 15 Robertson v Wallace (2000, QB) pg 204 (failed Conventional line doctrine test) 15 of Support 15 - WATER 16 Presumption: Ad medium filum aquae – “To the centre thread of the stream” 16 R v Nikal (1996, SCC) pg 213 17 Law of Accretion 17 18 (IP) 18 Property Rights in Ideas 18 Desney v Wilder (1956) can’t be property) 18 Property Rights in Information 19 International News Service v Associated Press (1918, US) (information is not protected) 19 CCH Canadian et al v. LSUC (2004, SCC) 19 – 20