Disciplinary Tribunal or the Legal Practitioners Conduct Board finds the person guilty of conduct which, in the opinion of the Chief Justice, is incompatible with the office of Senior Counsel, or if in the opinion of the Chief Justice that person has acted or practised in a manner incompatible with the office of Senior Counsel or if in the opinion of the Chief Justice that person is otherwise unfit to hold the office of Senior Counsel. Before exercising the powers conferred by this provision the Chief Justice will give the person concerned an opportunity to show cause why his or her appointment or recognition should not be revoked. 12.13.3 Without limiting the power of the Chief Justice under para 12.13.2, any Senior Counsel who changes his or her manner of practice will be expected to offer to resign his or her appointment. The Chief Justice may accept the resignation if the Chief Justice considers that, in the changed circumstances, the person does not qualify for appointment. 12.13.4 The revocation or resignation of an appointment shall be published in the South Australian Government Gazette. Direction 12.14 Interpretation – 12.14.1 In this Practice Direction a reference to the Chief Justice includes an Acting Chief Justice. If the Chief Justice is temporarily unable to perform the duties of the office, or is disqualified from discharging his or her functions under this Practice Direction, the powers of the Chief Justice shall devolve upon the senior puisne judge, or the next most senior judge who is available. 12.14.2 If the senior puisne judge or the junior puisne judge is temporarily unable to discharge their respective functions under this Practice Direction or are disqualified from discharging their respective functions under this Practice Direction, their function shall devolve upon, as the case may be, the next most senior judge or next most junior judge who is available.
Disciplinary Tribunal or the Legal Practitioners Conduct Board finds the person guilty of conduct which, in the opinion of the Chief Justice, is incompatible with the office of Senior Counsel, or if in the opinion of the Chief Justice that person has acted or practised in a manner incompatible with the office of Senior Counsel or if in the opinion of the Chief Justice that person is otherwise unfit to hold the office of Senior Counsel. Before exercising the powers conferred by this provision the Chief Justice will give the person concerned an opportunity to show cause why his or her appointment or recognition should not be revoked. 12.13.3 Without limiting the power of the Chief Justice under para 12.13.2, any Senior Counsel who changes his or her manner of practice will be expected to offer to resign his or her appointment. The Chief Justice may accept the resignation if the Chief Justice considers that, in the changed circumstances, the person does not qualify for appointment. 12.13.4 The revocation or resignation of an appointment shall be published in the South Australian Government Gazette. Direction 12.14 – Interpretation 12.14.1 In this Practice Direction a reference to the Chief Justice includes an Acting Chief Justice. If the Chief Justice is temporarily unable to perform the duties of the office, or is disqualified from discharging his or her functions under this Practice Direction, the powers of the Chief Justice shall devolve upon the senior puisne judge, or the next most senior judge who is available. 12.14.2 If the senior puisne judge or the junior puisne judge is temporarily unable to discharge their respective functions under this Practice Direction or are disqualified from discharging their respective functions under this Practice Direction, their function shall devolve upon, as the case may be, the next most senior judge or next most junior judge who is available.