outdoors, made children more attentive and more productive in the classroom So (Pellegrino).” the open ends, if breaks are proven to help a student refocus cognitively much let’s connect quicker why take way an important element that could benefit the learning of children. It goes back to how the predominant goal is to win the competition of which country has the best educational status. The system will go as far as reducing elective classes such as art, design, and music. It is understandable that their goal to make children more intelligent and spend more time in structuralize schedules to better their education, but they have to remember that the audience in which they are altering are not adults but children. Before making a very powerful decision that could affect the education of a child, the system should really look into harm it really is doing. Studies have also shown that outside recess and intensity of holds “the greatest quantity physical brings to the table the subject of technology and how so much activity.” Which investment is going into software updates rather than recess supplies or equipment for the variety. Technology improvements are great for the outside world, but the technology children’s within the school is making face to face interaction and personal relationship with teachers and peers a bit complicated. It is also a way to supplement recess since the system would rather give children a computer class rather than recess time because they believe it will be of improvement for their future. To an extent that is true, teaching children at a young age helps them retain the skills and ability much longer, but once again society and the educational system are making children mature in a way that childhood is no longer present to a lot of life. Their children’s childhood fun has become video games, iPads, and chatting rather than soccer, hiking, and face to face conversation. All such change is a part of the evolution of time and technology but that is no excuse for technology to take over experience of childhood. children’s
outdoors, made children more attentive and more productive in the classroom (Pellegrino).” So let’s connect the open ends, if breaks are proven to help a student refocus cognitively much quicker why take way an important element that could benefit the learning of children. It goes back to how the predominant goal is to win the competition of which country has the best educational status. The system will go as far as reducing elective classes such as art, design, and music. It is understandable that their goal to make children more intelligent and spend more time in structuralize schedules to better their education, but they have to remember that the audience in which they are altering are not adults but children. Before making a very powerful decision that could affect the education of a child, the system should really look into harm it really is doing. Studies have also shown that outside recess holds “the greatest quantity and intensity of physical activity.” Which brings to the table the subject of technology and how so much investment is going into software updates rather than recess supplies or equipment for the children’s variety. Technology improvements are great for the outside world, but the technology within the school is making face to face interaction and personal relationship with teachers and peers a bit complicated. It is also a way to supplement recess since the system would rather give children a computer class rather than recess time because they believe it will be of improvement for their future. To an extent that is true, teaching children at a young age helps them retain the skills and ability much longer, but once again society and the educational system are making children mature in a way that childhood is no longer present to a lot of children’s life. Their childhood fun has become video games, iPads, and chatting rather than soccer, hiking, and face to face conversation. All such change is a part of the evolution of time and technology but that is no excuse for technology to take over children’s experience of childhood.