* * * * * Date Attorney Name Firm Address City Re: CLAIMS OF (name of person contacting your office) FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE Dear Attorney/Source: you for referring [person seeking attorney services] to my office. At this time it is not feasible for me to proceed further with his/her case. I have enclosed a copy of the letter I have sent to him/her for your review. I deeply appreciate the and confidence you have placed in me by referring [person seeking attorney services]. If there is any way I can be of service to you or your firm in the future, please do not hesitate to call. Very yours, LAW OFFICES OF Enclosure Hard Drive: Desktop Folder: Claim Letter 1.3: Example: Trusts & Estates: Who is the Client This example is based upon a hypothetical discussed in Thomas L. Shaffer, Legal “The Ethics of Radical Individualism,” 65 Tex. L. Rev. 963 (1987). In that article, Professor Shaffer argues that the standard answer to the question is the client?” may sometimes be an “Who ethical evasion. How would you define the client in The Case of the Unwanted Will‖? Do you favor Shaffer’s approach? Assuming that the ethics rules do indeed assume a radical
* * * * * Date Attorney Name Firm Address City Re: CLAIMS OF (name of person contacting your office) FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE Dear Attorney/Source: you for referring [person seeking attorney services] to my office. At this time it is not feasible for me to proceed further with his/her case. I have enclosed a copy of the letter I have sent to him/her for your review. I deeply appreciate the and confidence you have placed in me by referring [person seeking attorney services]. If there is any way I can be of service to you or your firm in the future, please do not hesitate to call. Very yours, LAW OFFICES OF Enclosure Hard Drive: Desktop Folder: Claim Letter 1.3: Example: Trusts & Estates: Who is the Client This example is based upon a hypothetical discussed in Thomas L. Shaffer, “The Legal Ethics of Radical Individualism,” 65 Tex. L. Rev. 963 (1987). In that article, Professor Shaffer argues that the standard answer to the question “Who is the client?” may sometimes be an ethical evasion. How would you define the client in The Case of the Unwanted Will‖? Do you favor Shaffer’s approach? Assuming that the ethics rules do indeed assume a radical