fumigations should not be The TPG suggested the necessary, provided treatment Here we refer to supervision. More coherent with steward to consider rewording programmes protocols are properly section and text below programmes” as “treatment designed and can be verified to this term is confusing. In Category : SUBSTANTIVE ensure a high degree of system addition, see comment 9. integrity for the fumigation entity, process and commodity in question. Regarding the last sentence, Oversight should be appropriate to the TPG supported the changes promptly detect non-compliance from comment 1203. and correct deficiencies promptlytake corrective actions . 192 The NPPO of the country in the European The TPG suggested the following fumigation is conducted is For consistency with the draft standard on changes for consistency with the draft responsible for monitoring the temperature treatments following first ISPM on Requirements for the use of record keeping and the consultation. temperature treatments as documentation by the fumigation Category : SUBSTANTIVE phytosanitary measures: entities, and for ensuring that records are documentation. This NPPO of the country in which the “The information should be available to fumigation is conducted is responsible concerned parties. Trace-back for ensuring that treatment providers capability should be required. keep appropriate monitoring the records, such as raw data on fumigant concentration and temperature recorded during the treatmentkeeping and the documentation by the fumigation entities, and for ensuring that records are available to concerned parties. Accurate record keeping is essential to allow for capability.” TPG 194 TPG proposal (TPG 13): TPG proposal (TPG 13): 13 Procedures should be documented The TPG recommended this change to to ensure that commodities are use the Glossary term. fumigated in accordance with the
fumigations should not be necessary, provided treatment programmes protocols are properly designed and can be verified to ensure a high degree of system integrity for the fumigation entity, process and commodity in question. Oversight should be appropriate to promptly detect non-compliance and correct deficiencies promptlytake corrective actions . Here we refer to supervision. More coherent with section and text below Category : SUBSTANTIVE The TPG suggested the steward to consider rewording “treatment programmes” as this term is confusing. In addition, see comment 9. Regarding the last sentence, the TPG supported the changes from comment 1203. 192 The NPPO of the country in the fumigation is conducted is responsible for monitoring the record keeping and the documentation by the fumigation entities, and for ensuring that records are documentation. This information should be available to concerned parties. Trace-back capability should be required. European For consistency with the draft standard on temperature treatments following first consultation. Category : SUBSTANTIVE The TPG suggested the following changes for consistency with the draft ISPM on Requirements for the use of temperature treatments as phytosanitary measures: “The NPPO of the country in which the fumigation is conducted is responsible for ensuring that treatment providers keep appropriate monitoring the records, such as raw data on fumigant concentration and temperature recorded during the treatmentkeeping and the documentation by the fumigation entities, and for ensuring that records are available to concerned parties. Accurate record keeping is essential to allow for capability.” TPG 13 194 TPG proposal (TPG 13): Procedures should be documented to ensure that commodities are fumigated in accordance with the TPG proposal (TPG 13): The TPG recommended this change to use the Glossary term.