State and indicate that for students age assessments 18 and over, the district records Documents that the student has passed the MCAS or MCAS-Alternative. Interview At the time of the review, the district had not applied for a MCAS performance appeal within one academic year. PI Student record review, Conduct an analysis of a Provide the SE 9 Student documents, and interview cross section of student Department with a Timeline for the record review indicate that the district does records across all grade description of the root of determination not consistently provide the levels from January 2013 to cause(s) of the eligibility Documents parent with a proposed IEP and June 2013 to determine why noncompliance, a proposed placement, or a the district does not description of the Interview written explanation of the consistently meet the steps the district will finding of no eligibility, within timelines for student take to correct the 45 working days after receipt eligibility. root cause(s), and the of the parent’s consent to district’s proposed evaluate. timeline for Conduct a review of student implementation of records from those students corrective actions by who were evaluated by the November 1, 2013. district after all corrective actions were completed to verify that all timelines for Submit a report of the the determination of student results of the record eligibility are met. review. Include the number of records reviewed; the number of records in compliance; for records not in compliance, determine the root
State and assessments Documents Interview indicate that for students age 18 and over, the district records that the student has passed the MCAS or MCAS-Alternative. At the time of the review, the district had not applied for a MCAS performance appeal within one academic year. SE 9 Timeline for the determination of eligibility PI Student record review Documents Interview Student record review, documents, and interview indicate that the district does not consistently provide the parent with a proposed IEP and proposed placement, or a written explanation of the finding of no eligibility, within 45 working days after receipt of the parent’s consent to evaluate. Conduct an analysis of a cross section of student records across all grade levels from January 2013 to June 2013 to determine why the district does not consistently meet the timelines for student eligibility. Conduct a review of student records from those students who were evaluated by the district after all corrective actions were completed to verify that all timelines for the determination of student eligibility are met. Provide the Department with a description of the root cause(s) of the noncompliance, a description of the steps the district will take to correct the root cause(s), and the district’s proposed timeline for implementation of corrective actions by November 1, 2013. Submit a report of the results of the record review. Include the number of records reviewed; the number of records in compliance; for records not in compliance, determine the root