Service area 2013–2014 2014–2015 2015–2016 2015–2016 target Variation from Variation from target 2014–2015 Accommodation support n/a 91% 67% 75% ▼8% ▼24% Community-focused n/a 94% 75% 75% 0% ▼19% supports Coordination and individual n/a 80% 74% 75% ▼1% ▼6% support Family support n/a 96% 71% 75% ▼4% ▼25% Percentage of projects that achieved their outcome/s within the required time frame Background Projects are an important way we achieve outcomes for the community. Access and inclusion projects include DAIPs, advocacy and community education projects as well as service improvement projects which raise community awareness about disability. This indicator captures projects completed during the reporting period and assesses whether projects are undertaken efficiently. Analysis The 2015–2016 reporting period captures a greater number of projects than the previous year. This reflects the fact that 2015–2016 included the provision of many targeted grants and grants aiming to improve individual capacity, which are assessed as completed to deliver their outcomes within the required time. Results Key efficiency indicator 2013–2014 2014–2015 2015–2016 2015–2016 Variation from Variation from target target 2014–2015 Percentage of projects that achieved their outcome/s within 83% 86% 89% 90% ▼1% ▲43% the required time frame
Service area 2013–2014 2014–2015 2015–2016 2015–2016 target Variation from target Variation from 2014–2015 Accommodation support n/a 91% 67% 75% ▼8% ▼24% Community-focused supports n/a 94% 75% 75% 0% ▼19% Coordination and individual support n/a 80% 74% 75% ▼1% ▼6% Family support n/a 96% 71% 75% ▼4% ▼25% Percentage of projects that achieved their outcome/s within the required time frame Background Projects are an important way we achieve outcomes for the community. Access and inclusion projects include DAIPs, advocacy and community education projects as well as service improvement projects which raise community awareness about disability. This indicator captures projects completed during the reporting period and assesses whether projects are undertaken efficiently. Analysis The 2015–2016 reporting period captures a greater number of projects than the previous year. This reflects the fact that 2015–2016 included the provision of many targeted grants and grants aiming to improve individual capacity, which are assessed as completed to deliver their outcomes within the required time. Results Key efficiency indicator 2013–2014 2014–2015 2015–2016 2015–2016 target Variation from target Variation from 2014–2015 Percentage of projects that achieved their outcome/s within the required time frame 83% 86% 89% 90% ▼1% ▲43%