parameters attribute are values" generally variable. So this is a poor name. Proposed resolution: Revised Proposed changes: Replace by in the heading of (10.39 DMG MAC sublayer parameters) and in the caption “parameters” “attributes” of table 10-24—DMG MAC sublayer parameter values” “Table 3102 1735.41 10.24.16.2 "dot11DMGOptionImplemented Either shall be true for a DMG STA" delete cited text, or move to somewhere This is probably true by general to definition, so is unncessary. DMG But if necessary, it certainly STAs. doesn't deserve be to buried in the bowels of the DMS procedures. Proposed resolution: Revised Discussion: Deletion of the noted text does not make it clear the possible configuration for the MIB variables for the DMG case (see beginning of the sentence). dot11(#1676)DMSImplemented is true, at least one of(11aa) “When …” Propose to simply remove redundancy. Proposed changes: Change the noted paragraph as follows Implementation of DMS is optional for a WNM STA and mandatory for a robust AV streaming STA (as defined in 10.27.1 (Robust AV streaming dependencies(11aa))).(11aa) A STA that implements DMS has set to true. When dot11(#1676)DMSImplemented is true, at least one of(11aa) dot11WirelessManagementImplemented and dot11RobustAVStreamingImplemented shall be true,(11aa) dot11HighThroughputOptionImplemented shall be true for a non-DMG STA, and dot11DMGOptionImplemented shall be true (11ad). A STA that has a value of true for dot11(#1676)DMSActivated is defined as a STA that supports the directed multicast service(Ed). A STA for which dot11(#1676)DMSActivated is true shall set the DMS field of the Extended Capabilities element to 1.
parameters are generally variable. So this is a poor name. attribute values" Proposed resolution: Revised Proposed changes: Replace “parameters” by “attributes” in the heading of (10.39 DMG MAC sublayer parameters) and in the caption of table “Table 10-24—DMG MAC sublayer parameter values” 3102 1735.41 10.24.16.2 "dot11DMGOptionImplemented shall be true for a DMG STA" This is probably true by definition, so is unncessary. But if necessary, it certainly doesn't deserve be to buried in the bowels of the DMS procedures. Either delete cited text, or move to somewhere general to DMG STAs. Proposed resolution: Revised Discussion: Deletion of the noted text does not make it clear the possible configuration for the MIB variables for the DMG case “When dot11(#1676)DMSImplemented is true, at least one of(11aa) …” (see beginning of the sentence). Propose to simply remove redundancy. Proposed changes: Change the noted paragraph as follows Implementation of DMS is optional for a WNM STA and mandatory for a robust AV streaming STA (as defined in 10.27.1 (Robust AV streaming dependencies(11aa))).(11aa) A STA that implements DMS has set to true. When dot11(#1676)DMSImplemented is true, at least one of(11aa) dot11WirelessManagementImplemented and dot11RobustAVStreamingImplemented shall be true,(11aa) dot11HighThroughputOptionImplemented shall be true for a non-DMG STA, and dot11DMGOptionImplemented shall be true (11ad). A STA that has a value of true for dot11(#1676)DMSActivated is defined as a STA that supports the directed multicast service(Ed). A STA for which dot11(#1676)DMSActivated is true shall set the DMS field of the Extended Capabilities element to 1.