(39 substantial way. Strays off reading. Points i.e. Clarity and pace The presentation consists OHP, powerpoint, – 20) the subject very frequently. made in the are totally entirely of reading from a slides etc. presentation are inappropriate. script with no reference to The presentation contains unsupported, and audience either directly or much irrelevance. appear to be based in the content entirely on personal experience and opinion. May be errors of fact. Bad Fail No attempt to present Little or no understanding of No evidence of No attempt to Little or no evidence of No attempt to use material related to the basic concepts. Contains many background deliver an oral audience engagement. supporting material. (0 19) – subject. factual errors. reading. Material is presentation of the often incorrect. required standard. QUALITATIVE CRITERIA FOR JUDGMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF LEVEL 5 WRITTEN EXAMINATION ANSWERS MARK COMMENT KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING COVERAGE STYLE/CLARITY Outstanding Almost faultless for this level, totally relevant, Outstanding breadth and Excellent presentation and use of answer a thoughtful answer with integration of depth. Extensive illustrative material. 80 - 100 concepts. Organisation of argument and supplementary reading Extremely well written excellent – essay structure shows full understanding and which is integrated into structure and coherence. use of knowledge. Shows insight and the answer with
(39 – 20) substantial way. Strays off the subject very frequently. The presentation contains much irrelevance. reading. Points made in the presentation are unsupported, and appear to be based entirely on personal experience and opinion. May be errors of fact. i.e. Clarity and pace are totally inappropriate. The presentation consists entirely of reading from a script with no reference to audience either directly or in the content OHP, powerpoint, slides etc. Bad Fail (0 – 19) No attempt to present material related to the subject. Little or no understanding of basic concepts. Contains many factual errors. No evidence of background reading. Material is often incorrect. No attempt to deliver an oral presentation of the required standard. Little or no evidence of audience engagement. No attempt to use supporting material. QUALITATIVE CRITERIA FOR JUDGMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF LEVEL 5 WRITTEN EXAMINATION ANSWERS MARK COMMENT KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING COVERAGE STYLE/CLARITY 80 - 100 Outstanding answer Almost faultless for this level, totally relevant, a thoughtful answer with integration of concepts. Organisation of argument and essay structure shows full understanding and use of knowledge. Shows insight and Outstanding breadth and depth. Extensive supplementary reading which is integrated into the answer with Excellent presentation and use of illustrative material. Extremely well written – excellent structure and coherence.