For each of the core functions indicated below, identify whether the product and version proposed for the SCO CMS is the vendor’s generally available (GA) release or its “next generation” release, including the year first installed and the number of Courts running the software. Explain the rationale for proposing this version. CORE PRODUCTS TECHNOLOGY STATUS Version Development GA or First # of Why This Version is Core Product Function Proposed Platform NEW Installed Customers Proposed Case Management Content Management E-Filing Manager Case Management System Product Direction Describe plans for ongoing development and enhancement of the Case Management System. State whether a new version of the software is currently in development and when that version may be available. Additionally, indicate how often new releases – both major and minor – are typically provided and whether each release must be installed or not in order to implement future versions of the software. Electronic Content Management System Product Direction Describe plans for ongoing development and enhancement of the Electronic Content Management System. State whether a new version of the software is currently in development and when that version may be available. Additionally, indicate how often new releases – both major and minor – are typically provided and whether each release must be installed or not in order to implement future versions of the software. E-Filing Manager Product Direction Describe plans for ongoing development and enhancement of the E-Filing manager component. State whether a new version of the software is currently in development and when that version may be available. Additionally, indicate how often new releases – both major and minor – are typically provided and whether each release must be installed or not in order to implement future versions of the software. Integration Architecture / Information Exchanges The SCO expects the solution to be capable of sharing data electronically with existing systems used by other members of the justice community and with key local, state and national information systems.
For each of the core functions indicated below, identify whether the product and version proposed for the SCO CMS is the vendor’s generally available (GA) release or its “next generation” release, including the year first installed and the number of Courts running the software. Explain the rationale for proposing this version. CORE PRODUCTS TECHNOLOGY STATUS Core Product Function Version Proposed Development Platform GA or NEW First Installed # of Customers Why This Version is Proposed Case Management Content Management E-Filing Manager Case Management System Product Direction Describe plans for ongoing development and enhancement of the Case Management System. State whether a new version of the software is currently in development and when that version may be available. Additionally, indicate how often new releases – both major and minor – are typically provided and whether each release must be installed or not in order to implement future versions of the software. Electronic Content Management System Product Direction Describe plans for ongoing development and enhancement of the Electronic Content Management System. State whether a new version of the software is currently in development and when that version may be available. Additionally, indicate how often new releases – both major and minor – are typically provided and whether each release must be installed or not in order to implement future versions of the software. E-Filing Manager Product Direction Describe plans for ongoing development and enhancement of the E-Filing manager component. State whether a new version of the software is currently in development and when that version may be available. Additionally, indicate how often new releases – both major and minor – are typically provided and whether each release must be installed or not in order to implement future versions of the software. Integration Architecture / Information Exchanges The SCO expects the solution to be capable of sharing data electronically with existing systems used by other members of the justice community and with key local, state and national information systems.