Rating on Standard 7: Student Academic Progress Teacher Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Student Achievement Goal Other Measures of Student Description Data Setting Attainment Progress/ Achievement Summary Other Information* Seventh-grade On the Mathematics Standards of All students demonstrated On quarterly benchmark assessments, mathematics teacher Learning test, 9 percent of students measurable progress on a students typically performed well and who teaches five experienced low growth (<35). rigorous goal that focused on outperformed students in classes classes Twenty-three percent of students mathematics skills. One across the school division. The school experienced moderate growth hundred percent of the students instituted a performance assessment (between 35 and 65) and 48 percent met the goal established at the to assess conceptual understanding in of students experienced high beginning of the year and 60 mathematics and 90 percent of the growth (> 65). SGPs are not percent of students exceeded teacher’s students performed at or available for 20 percent of the the goal. above the proficient level. students. Level 1 Analysis of Student Academic Progress Data For each data source, Exemplary Exemplary Exemplary use the rubric for Proficient Proficient Proficient rating on Standard 7: Developing/ Needs Developing/ Developing/ Needs Improvement Student Academic Improvement Improvement Unacceptable Progress. Unacceptable Unacceptable Rationale: Rationale: Rationale: Level 2 Analysis of Student Academic Progress Data Based on the ratings indicated Exemplary Rationale: above, indicate a summative Proficient rating for this seventh-grade Developing/ teacher for Standard 7: Student Improvement Academic Progress. Unacceptable * We recommend summary supporting data be attached by the teacher. Simulation 3 Middle School Art Teacher – Rating on Standard 7: Student Academic Progress
Rating on Standard 7: Student Academic Progress Teacher Description Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Data Student Achievement Goal Setting Attainment Summary Other Measures of Student Progress/ Achievement Other Information* Seventh-grade mathematics teacher who teaches five classes On the Mathematics Standards of Learning test, 9 percent of students experienced low growth (<35). Twenty-three percent of students experienced moderate growth (between 35 and 65) and 48 percent of students experienced high growth (> 65). SGPs are not available for 20 percent of the students. All students demonstrated measurable progress on a rigorous goal that focused on mathematics skills. One hundred percent of the students met the goal established at the beginning of the year and 60 percent of students exceeded the goal. On quarterly benchmark assessments, students typically performed well and outperformed students in classes across the school division. The school instituted a performance assessment to assess conceptual understanding in mathematics and 90 percent of the teacher’s students performed at or above the proficient level. Level 1 Analysis of Student Academic Progress Data For each data source, use the rubric for rating on Standard 7: Student Academic Progress. Exemplary Proficient Developing/ Needs Improvement Unacceptable Rationale: Exemplary Proficient Developing/ Improvement Unacceptable Rationale: Exemplary Proficient Developing/ Needs Improvement Unacceptable Rationale: Level 2 Analysis of Student Academic Progress Data Based on the ratings indicated above, indicate a summative rating for this seventh-grade teacher for Standard 7: Student Academic Progress. Exemplary Proficient Developing/ Improvement Unacceptable Rationale: * We recommend summary supporting data be attached by the teacher. Simulation 3 – Middle School Art Teacher Rating on Standard 7: Student Academic Progress