IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Addressing Comment Resolutions Date: 2015-07-09 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email 170 W Tasman Dr David Kloper Cisco Systems, Inc. 408-526-5041 dakloper@cisco.com San Jose, CA 95134 CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Ad-hoc Notes 206 6.07 4.3.23.1 SYNRA is introduced to Change the wording to: Revise: "SYNRA is prevent bridge, and may have "SYNRA is introduced to introduced to improve benefit of improving prevent bridge, and may have bandwidth usage in some bandwidth usage in some benefit of improving cases of group-addressed cases bandwidth usage in some frames to cases" the GLK non-AP STAs" -> "SYNRA is introduced to improve bandwidth usage in cases of group-addressed frames when the 802.1Q bridge requires that they be forwarded to a subset of the GLK non-AP STAs" 41 6.09 4.3.23.1 "Thus SYNRA special Power Strike quoted text. Discuss: What was intended Save handling need only by the original text? Should consider the GLK AP case." - text be replaced with other how can "a handling" consider statement(s)? anything? This is meaningless.
IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Addressing Comment Resolutions Date: 2015-07-09 Author(s): Name Affiliation Address Phone email David Kloper Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 W Tasman Dr San Jose, CA 95134 408-526-5041 dakloper@cisco.com CID Page Clause Comment Proposed Change Ad-hoc Notes 206 6.07 4.3.23.1 SYNRA is introduced to prevent bridge, and may have benefit of improving bandwidth usage in some cases Change the wording to: "SYNRA is introduced to prevent bridge, and may have benefit of improving bandwidth usage in some cases" Revise: "SYNRA is introduced to improve bandwidth usage in some cases of group-addressed frames to the GLK non-AP STAs" -> "SYNRA is introduced to improve bandwidth usage in cases of group-addressed frames when the 802.1Q bridge requires that they be forwarded to a subset of the GLK non-AP STAs" 41 6.09 4.3.23.1 "Thus SYNRA special Power Save handling need only consider the GLK AP case." - how can "a handling" consider anything? This is meaningless. Strike quoted text. Discuss: What was intended by the original text? Should text be replaced with other statement(s)?