8131 Matthew 70.34 Too many of the Reconcile the table Revise generally – Fischer entries for column in 9.4.2.200 TWT agree with "Description when element with Table comment - TGax transmitted by a TWT 10-19a--TWT setup editor shall make scheduling STA, Wake exchange the changes shown TBTT Negotiation command in 11-17/0777r1 subfield = 1" have interpretation - that are marked "NA" - according to noting that Table with CID 8131. Table 10-19a--TWT 10-19a is the more setup exchange correct one. command interpretation, there should be more entries with something other than NA here. 8144 Matthew 69.36 The TWT Channel Change the TWT Revise other – Fischer should be or 1 Channel octet changes have because for bTWT, the count in figure caused a separate TWT channel is not TWT diagram to be present element format to created, so the read "0 or 1" change is effected instead of "1" in spirit, but differently than suggested - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r1 that are marked with CID 8144. 8195 Osama 69.22 there may be a as in comment. Reject it’s 200 – numbering issue. 9.4.2.200 in 11ah is assigned to TSF Timer Accuracy element. May need to change the numbering for TWT element 8196 69.30 Comparing the IE in clarify Reject the text – Figure 9-589av to the explains the one in 11ah draft, it difference, in that seems that this TWT the Broadcast bit is element is a new reserved for S1G, element by adding and it explains how Broadcast TWT ID. the format changes The question is; is this dependent on the a new IE? If not then I value of the don't understand what Broadcast subfield. format is now used for Between these two ah facts, the format for each case should be clear.
8131 Matthew Fischer 70.34 Too many of the entries for column "Description when transmitted by a TWT scheduling STA, Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield = 1" have "NA" - according to Table 10-19a--TWT setup exchange command interpretation, there should be more entries with something other than NA here. Reconcile the table in 9.4.2.200 TWT element with Table 10-19a--TWT setup exchange command interpretation - noting that Table 10-19a is the more correct one. Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r1 that are marked with CID 8131. 8144 Matthew Fischer 69.36 The TWT Channel should be or 1 because for bTWT, the TWT channel is not present Change the TWT Channel octet count in figure TWT element format to read "0 or 1" instead of "1" Revise – other changes have caused a separate diagram to be created, so the change is effected in spirit, but differently than suggested - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r1 that are marked with CID 8144. 8195 Osama 69.22 there may be a numbering issue. 9.4.2.200 in 11ah is assigned to TSF Timer Accuracy element. May need to change the numbering for TWT element as in comment. Reject – it’s 200 8196 69.30 Comparing the IE in Figure 9-589av to the one in 11ah draft, it seems that this TWT element is a new element by adding Broadcast TWT ID. The question is; is this a new IE? If not then I don't understand what format is now used for ah clarify Reject – the text explains the difference, in that the Broadcast bit is reserved for S1G, and it explains how the format changes dependent on the value of the Broadcast subfield. Between these two facts, the format for each case should be clear.