(I2, p Xu, 2013 12 0.96(0.84-1.09) 33%, 0.12 White meat Case-control:8 0.84 (0.67–1.06) 41%, 0.10 Prospective:4 0.73 (0.61–0.88) 0%, 0.64 11 0.97(0.80-1.19) 42%, 0.07 Highest vs lowest Fish Case-control:10 0.94(0.76-1.17) 42%, 0.08 Prospective:1 1.25(0.85-1.84) - 7 0.96(0.82-1.18) 38%, 0.14 Poultry Case-control:5 0.96(0.72-1.29) 54%, 0.07 Prospective:2 0.97(0.78-1.21) 0%, 0.35 2.5.1.2 Processed meat Heterogeneity Author, Year Number of studies Comparison RR (95%CI) (I2, p value)* All: 10 1.29 (1.10-1.53) 27% Aune, 2013 Per 50 g/day Case-control: 8 1.23 (0.99-1.52) 37 % Prospective: 2 1.45 (1.10-1.90) 0 % 2.5.1.3 Red meat Heterogeneity Author, Year Number of studies Comparison RR (95%CI) (I2, p value)* All: 16 1.27 (1.16-1.40) 5% Aune, 2013 Per 100 g/day Case-control: 10 1.34 (1.12-1.59) 31 % Prospective: 6 1.20 (1.06-1.36) 0 % 5.1.2 Dietary
(I2, p Xu, 2013 White meat 12 Highest vs lowest 0.96(0.84-1.09) 33%, 0.12 Case-control:8 0.84 (0.67–1.06) 41%, 0.10 Prospective:4 0.73 (0.61–0.88) 0%, 0.64 Fish 11 0.97(0.80-1.19) 42%, 0.07 Case-control:10 0.94(0.76-1.17) 42%, 0.08 Prospective:1 1.25(0.85-1.84) - Poultry 7 0.96(0.82-1.18) 38%, 0.14 Case-control:5 0.96(0.72-1.29) 54%, 0.07 Prospective:2 0.97(0.78-1.21) 0%, 0.35 2.5.1.2 Processed meat Author, Year Number of studies Comparison RR (95%CI) Heterogeneity (I2, p value)* Aune, 2013 All: 10 Per 50 g/day 1.29 (1.10-1.53) 27% Case-control: 8 1.23 (0.99-1.52) 37 % Prospective: 2 1.45 (1.10-1.90) 0 % 2.5.1.3 Red meat Author, Year Number of studies Comparison RR (95%CI) Heterogeneity (I2, p value)* Aune, 2013 All: 16 Per 100 g/day 1.27 (1.16-1.40) 5% Case-control: 10 1.34 (1.12-1.59) 31 % Prospective: 6 1.20 (1.06-1.36) 0 % 5.1.2 Dietary