27.9.3.1 296.32 Change 28-21 as comment Revise TGax editor to – Lv (Spatial Reuse subfield make changes as encoding for an HE SU shown in PPDU, that are HE ER SU PPDU, and marked with CID 12254 HE MU PPDU) " to "Table 28-22 (Spatial Reuse subfield encoding for an HE TB PPDU)" 27.9.3.1 296.33 RPL definition would be Add the RPL Revise TGax editor to – part of bullet 2) not in the definition before make changes as LEE subbullet of a) or b) subbullet a) and b) shown in and delete the that are description in the marked with CID subbullets 13562, which does something very similar to what the commenter suggests, noting that SRP is mentioned before RPL, so the natural order should be to describe SRP before RPL. 13833 27.9.3.1 296.38 "The value of the Spatial Following text will Reject the value to be – Reuse information of the be better. used is not actually the Inoue SIGA SRP field of the value of the field, but a HE TB PPDU that ..." "The of the value that is based on Spatial Reuse field the field value after This text is ambiguous in HE-SIG-A of the performing a lookup and should be improved. HE TB PPDU that into a table. ..." 27.9.3.1 296.50 what is difference as in comment Revise TGax editor to – between RXVECTOR make changes as BSS_COLOR and BSS in 11-18/0026r10 that color of the are marked with CID DSRP_PPDU? They 11560 seem like they would be derived from the same PPDU Shouldn't it be "does not Reject the HE TB 11819 27.9.3.1 296.50 – Li match the BSS color PPDU color has to match the trigger color, otherwise, the SRP information obtained from the trigger common info field is not applicable to the HE TB PPDU. Similarly, if the SRP information read from the HE TB PPDU does not match the color of the trigger frame, then the interference calculation that was performed on the trigger frame is not valid.
Lv 27.9.3.1 296.32 Change 28-21 (Spatial Reuse subfield encoding for an HE SU PPDU, HE ER SU PPDU, and HE MU PPDU) " to "Table 28-22 (Spatial Reuse subfield encoding for an HE TB PPDU)" as comment Revise – TGax editor to make changes as shown in that are marked with CID 12254 LEE 27.9.3.1 296.33 RPL definition would be part of bullet 2) not in the subbullet of a) or b) Add the RPL definition before subbullet a) and b) and delete the description in the subbullets Revise – TGax editor to make changes as shown in that are marked with CID 13562, which does something very similar to what the commenter suggests, noting that SRP is mentioned before RPL, so the natural order should be to describe SRP before RPL. 13833 Inoue 27.9.3.1 296.38 "The value of the Spatial Reuse information of the SIGA SRP field of the HE TB PPDU that ..." This text is ambiguous and should be improved. Following text will be better. "The of the Spatial Reuse field in HE-SIG-A of the HE TB PPDU that ..." Reject – the value to be used is not actually the value of the field, but a value that is based on the field value after performing a lookup into a table. 27.9.3.1 296.50 what is difference between RXVECTOR BSS_COLOR and BSS color of the DSRP_PPDU? They seem like they would be derived from the same PPDU as in comment Revise – TGax editor to make changes as in 11-18/0026r10 that are marked with CID 11560 11819 Li 27.9.3.1 296.50 Shouldn't it be "does not match the BSS color Reject – the HE TB PPDU color has to match the trigger color, otherwise, the SRP information obtained from the trigger common info field is not applicable to the HE TB PPDU. Similarly, if the SRP information read from the HE TB PPDU does not match the color of the trigger frame, then the interference calculation that was performed on the trigger frame is not valid.