flush as the commenter suggested, it means that the originator can send fragments again and if as a result, the MSDU is completed and passed to the next MAC process, the MSDU reordering will get messed up. 13659 Tomoko In the baseline, the As in comment. Revised. Adachi BlockAck frame variant See the instructions encoding and the to the TGax editor BlockAckReq frame in doc. 11-18/0733. variant were aligned. Note to the TGax As the BlockAck frame editor: subclause variant encoding has 10.24.6 was been changed from the modified by 11ak baseline, the draft but it is not BlockAckReq frame reflected in 11ax variant encoding D2.3. The track should be also changes shown in changed. doc.11-18/0733 is The old subfield names based on the text in should be also 11ax D2.3 but 11ak searched through the modification should baseline and the draft be incorporated and should be updated. and changes should be made thereto. 10.24.6 CID Commenter PP.LL Comment Proposed Change Resolution 11056 Adrian 202.44 "The B2 bit of the BA Name bit 2 at the Revised. Stephens Type subfield of the point of definition In the past there BA Control shall once, and refer to it were names for bit be set to 1" -- this cries here. 2 and bits 3-4, but out for this bit to be Name bits 3-4 as a there was an named. Magic subfield at the point agreement to numbers in the text are of definition and refer change the inherently evil. to the name here. encoding of bit fields to make Also "B3-B4 bits of the better use of them. BA Type " at line 6. So, bringing back These should also the names is not have a name. appropriate. And "B-B4 bits ... shall See the instructions be set 1 to" is to the TGax editor ambiguous. It is in doc. 11-18/0733. perfectly reasonable to read this as both of
flush as the commenter suggested, it means that the originator can send fragments again and if as a result, the MSDU is completed and passed to the next MAC process, the MSDU reordering will get messed up. 13659 Tomoko Adachi In the baseline, the BlockAck frame variant encoding and the BlockAckReq frame variant were aligned. As the BlockAck frame variant encoding has been changed from the baseline, the BlockAckReq frame variant encoding should be also changed. The old subfield names should be also searched through the baseline and the draft and should be updated. As in comment. Revised. See the instructions to the TGax editor in doc. 11-18/0733. Note to the TGax editor: subclause 10.24.6 was modified by 11ak draft but it is not reflected in 11ax D2.3. The track changes shown in doc.11-18/0733 is based on the text in 11ax D2.3 but 11ak modification should be incorporated and changes should be made thereto. 10.24.6 CID Commenter PP.LL Comment Proposed Change Resolution 11056 Adrian Stephens 202.44 "The B2 bit of the BA Type subfield of the BA Control shall be set to 1" -- this cries out for this bit to be named. Magic numbers in the text are inherently evil. Also "B3-B4 bits of the BA Type " at line 6. These should also have a name. And "B-B4 bits ... shall be set 1 to" is ambiguous. It is perfectly reasonable to read this as both of Name bit 2 at the point of definition once, and refer to it here. Name bits 3-4 as a subfield at the point of definition and refer to the name here. Revised. In the past there were names for bit 2 and bits 3-4, but there was an agreement to change the encoding of bit fields to make better use of them. So, bringing back the names is not appropriate. See the instructions to the TGax editor in doc. 11-18/0733.