Response adequately addresses the requirements being 70% Adequate scored. Any omission(s), flaw(s), or defect(s) are inconsequential and acceptable. Response fully addresses the requirements being scored with a good degree of confidence in the Firm’s response 80% Good or proposed solution. No identified omission(s), flaw(s), or defect(s). Any identified weaknesses are minimal, inconsequential, and acceptable. Response fully addresses the requirements being scored with a high degree of confidence in the Firm’s response 90% Excellent or proposed solution. Firm offers one or more enhancing features, methods or approaches exceeding basic expectations. All requirements are addressed with the highest degree of confidence in the Firm’s response or proposed 100% Exceptional solution. The response exceeds the requirements in providing multiple enhancing features, a creative approach, or an exceptional solution. - Possible *References and work examples will be considered throughout the scoring Points criteria* Written Evaluation Criteria Approach to Tasks in Scope of Work TASK 1 Contract Management and Administrative Duties 10 – TASK 2 Document Production 5 – TASK 3 Interpreting and Translation Services 5 – TASK 4 Outreach, Communication, Technical Support, and Facilitation 10 – Services TASK 5 Environmental, Conservation, and Land Use Planning for Energy 40 – Infrastructure Planning and Implementation TASK 6 Energy Facility and Energy Infrastructure Planning, Studies, 40 – Analysis, and Reports TASK 7 Train Staff, Commissioners and Advisors, Agencies, and 10 – Stakeholders Project Team Organizational Structure and Cost Minimization Effectiveness of the Firm’s strategies to minimize travel and per diem and 10 related time charges. Ability of the Firm to quickly add and train new team members as needed. 10 Effectiveness of the Firm’s strategies to minimize charges being 10 trained by the Energy Commission.
70% Adequate Response adequately addresses the requirements being scored. Any omission(s), flaw(s), or defect(s) are inconsequential and acceptable. 80% Good Response fully addresses the requirements being scored with a good degree of confidence in the Firm’s response or proposed solution. No identified omission(s), flaw(s), or defect(s). Any identified weaknesses are minimal, inconsequential, and acceptable. 90% Excellent Response fully addresses the requirements being scored with a high degree of confidence in the Firm’s response or proposed solution. Firm offers one or more enhancing features, methods or approaches exceeding basic expectations. 100% Exceptional All requirements are addressed with the highest degree of confidence in the Firm’s response or proposed solution. The response exceeds the requirements in providing multiple enhancing features, a creative approach, or an exceptional solution. - *References and work examples will be considered throughout the scoring criteria* Possible Points Written Evaluation Criteria Approach to Tasks in Scope of Work TASK 1 – Contract Management and Administrative Duties 10 TASK 2 – Document Production 5 TASK 3 – Interpreting and Translation Services 5 TASK 4 – Outreach, Communication, Technical Support, and Facilitation Services 10 TASK 5 – Environmental, Conservation, and Land Use Planning for Energy Infrastructure Planning and Implementation 40 TASK 6 – Energy Facility and Energy Infrastructure Planning, Studies, Analysis, and Reports 40 TASK 7 – Train Staff, Commissioners and Advisors, Agencies, and Stakeholders 10 Project Team Organizational Structure and Cost Minimization Effectiveness of the Firm’s strategies to minimize travel and per diem and related time charges. 10 Ability of the Firm to quickly add and train new team members as needed. 10 Effectiveness of the Firm’s strategies to minimize charges being trained by the Energy Commission. 10