DEL vs. DEM: = 121, < .001, 95% U p CI = [60.20, 78.40] DEM vs. CON: U = 1265, = .0995% CI p = [-15.32, 2.54] BAT 4 (2.25-5) 6 (4.75-6.26) 7 (6-7) (2) = 62.19, < .001 DEL vs. CON: = 262.5, < .001; 95% H p U p (max. score = 7) CI = [51.43, 83.86] DEL vs. DEM: = 704.5, < .001, 95% U p CI = [14.37, 47.10] DEM vs. CON: U = 656.5, < .001, 95% p CI = [20.85, 52.96] Table 1.
DEL vs. DEM: U = 121, p < .001, 95% CI = [60.20, 78.40] DEM vs. CON: U = 1265, p = .0995% CI = [-15.32, 2.54] BAT (max. score = 7) 4 (2.25-5) 6 (4.75-6.26) 7 (6-7) H (2) = 62.19, p < .001 DEL vs. CON: U = 262.5, p < .001; 95% CI = [51.43, 83.86] DEL vs. DEM: U = 704.5, p < .001, 95% CI = [14.37, 47.10] DEM vs. CON: U = 656.5, p < .001, 95% CI = [20.85, 52.96] Table 1.