Department/Program of Study: _____MBA_____________________________ Submitted by: _______Patricia Nemetz Mills___________________________ Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 2nd Friday Fall Qtr 2009 Conduct process 2009-10 academic year Submit findings 6th Friday Spring 2010 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Objective Strategy/Method Performance Scoring Levels Expectation Outcome Goal of Measurement Characteristics Standard Analyze and To articulate, Students present a See attached rubric. 1=does not meet Ninety percent of explain, and portfolio of work expectations students should formulate evaluate functional from various score 3.0 or better solutions to and integrative classes in the MBA 2=marginally meets for the first two problems theories, program. For the expectations categories on the related to the perspectives, assessment rubric, and 95% environment in concepts, and facts, exercise, students 3=meets should pass the oral then to apply those update, correct, and expectations exam as described theories, present a strategy on the rubrics. organizations perspectives, case on a company 4=exceeds (Note: the exist and concepts, and facts to a panel of three expectations quantitative function to solve practical evaluators. Each category was not including problems, support evaluator scores scored) arguments, and the student’s information evaluate multiple performance. The technology, viewpoints in the third evaluator, legal, ethical, context of company who is the graduate economic, strategy, school social, political governance, and representative has structure. the option of and global scoring or checking aspects. a box to indicate that the exam was conducted fairly. A copy of the rubric used is attached, along with the explanation associated with each rating value. Assessment Report
Department/Program of Study: _____MBA_____________________________ Submitted by: _______Patricia Nemetz Mills___________________________ Action Due Date CAC Approval Submit initial plan 2nd Friday Fall Qtr 2009 Conduct process 2009-10 academic year Submit findings 6th Friday Spring 2010 Assessment Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 Learning Outcome Goal Objective Strategy/Method of Measurement Performance Characteristics Scoring Levels Expectation Standard Analyze and formulate solutions to problems related to the environment in organizations exist and function including information technology, legal, ethical, economic, social, political and global aspects. To articulate, explain, and evaluate functional and integrative theories, perspectives, concepts, and facts, then to apply those theories, perspectives, concepts, and facts to solve practical problems, support arguments, and evaluate multiple viewpoints in the context of company strategy, governance, and structure. Students present a portfolio of work from various classes in the MBA program. For the assessment exercise, students update, correct, and present a strategy case on a company to a panel of three evaluators. Each evaluator scores the student’s performance. The third evaluator, who is the graduate school representative has the option of scoring or checking a box to indicate that the exam was conducted fairly. A copy of the rubric used is attached, along with the explanation associated with each rating value. See attached rubric. 1=does not meet expectations 2=marginally meets expectations 3=meets expectations 4=exceeds expectations Ninety percent of students should score 3.0 or better for the first two categories on the rubric, and 95% should pass the oral exam as described on the rubrics. (Note: the quantitative category was not scored) Assessment Report