deployed devices. This comment is proposing a change for the 802.11-2012 case. A similar change could be considered for DMG and S1G cases as well, if those are expected to have interoperability issues. Alternatively, the AID field definition could be left as-is and the specific uses of AID field in the relevant frames (at least (Re)Association Response frames) could be specified to set the two MSBs to 1. 1338 1285.37 37 9.4.2.185 " At least one of the bits in Change the cited text at the FILSC Type field is set to 1. " referenced location to "At -- but setting one of the least one of the reserved bits would not be bits in FILSC Type helpful (and would be field is set to 1." contrary to the definition of "reserved") 1343 1955.16 16 "If the next Beacon is not Add "frame" after "Beacon" 4 used as a response" is in the cited text at the missing "frame" referenced location
deployed devices. This comment is proposing a change for the 802.11-2012 case. A similar change could be considered for DMG and S1G cases as well, if those are expected to have interoperability issues. Alternatively, the AID field definition could be left as-is and the specific uses of AID field in the relevant frames (at least (Re)Association Response frames) could be specified to set the two MSBs to 1. 1338 1285.37 37 9.4.2.185 " At least one of the bits in FILSC Type field is set to 1. " -- but setting one of the reserved bits would not be helpful (and would be contrary to the definition of "reserved") Change the cited text at the referenced location to "At least one of the bits in FILSC Type field is set to 1." 1343 1955.16 16 "If the next Beacon is not used as a response" is missing "frame" Add "frame" after "Beacon" in the cited text at the referenced location 4