the entire preamble and SIG field, which requires the aRxPHYStartDelay plus additional time to actually perform the decode operation. I.e. SIFS + aRxPHYStartDelay only accounts for the appearance of the SIG field, but does not allow any time for decoding of the SIG field, so additional time is needed to account for that operation. 15749 Jarkko 345.61 The paragraph in lines Clarify or delete the Revise TGax editor – Kneckt 61 -65 is not clearly 61 -65. to make changes as written. What is meant shown in 11-18/1410r4 with:"In cases when that are marked with condition 2) above is CID 15749, which not met because there deletes the paragraph is no SR PPDU because when queued for condition is not met transmission,". for any reason, then Clause 27.9.3.5 allows the STA is not only SR PPDU permitted to transmission in a SRP discontinue the opportunity, so why a reception or signal an case when SR PPDU idle medium condition, is not available for and therefore, no other transmission relevant? reception should take Please rewrite the place to which this paragraph more STA will need to clearly and make sure respond. that there is no contradiction with 27.9.3.5. 15750 Jarkko 345.48 Figure 27-11 should Please add SR Revise TGax editor – Kneckt also show SR PPDU. PPDU to the figure. to make changes as shown in 11-18/1410r4 that are marked with CID 15750, which adds an SR PPDU and a BA and a indication to the figure. Jarkko 347.20 Double negation Change double Reject what looks 15751 – Kneckt 6 should be avoided. negation to like a simple change is Please change to positive. complex because the positive wording. statement is adding a restriction for existing behavior, where a response would be transmitted normally but only if certain conditions are met, e.g. the PPDU is
the entire preamble and SIG field, which requires the aRxPHYStartDelay plus additional time to actually perform the decode operation. I.e. SIFS + aRxPHYStartDelay only accounts for the appearance of the SIG field, but does not allow any time for decoding of the SIG field, so additional time is needed to account for that operation. 15749 Jarkko Kneckt 345.61 The paragraph in lines 61 -65 is not clearly written. What is meant with:"In cases when condition 2) above is not met because there is no SR PPDU queued for transmission,". Clause 27.9.3.5 allows only SR PPDU transmission in a SRP opportunity, so why a case when SR PPDU is not available for transmission relevant? Please rewrite the paragraph more clearly and make sure that there is no contradiction with 27.9.3.5. Clarify or delete the 61 -65. Revise – TGax editor to make changes as shown in 11-18/1410r4 that are marked with CID 15749, which deletes the paragraph because when condition is not met for any reason, then the STA is not permitted to discontinue the reception or signal an idle medium condition, and therefore, no other reception should take place to which this STA will need to respond. 15750 Jarkko Kneckt 345.48 Figure 27-11 should also show SR PPDU. Please add SR PPDU to the figure. Revise – TGax editor to make changes as shown in 11-18/1410r4 that are marked with CID 15750, which adds an SR PPDU and a BA and a indication to the figure. 15751 Jarkko Kneckt 347.20 Double negation should be avoided. Please change to positive wording. Change double negation to positive. Reject – what looks like a simple change is complex because the statement is adding a restriction for existing behavior, where a response would be transmitted normally but only if certain conditions are met, e.g. the PPDU is 6