Requirements of CA a few paragaphs. Public Utilities Code Regarding the Section 745 for categories of Default TOU Rates customers that for Residential should be studied to Customers, pp. 4-5. comply with Section Opening Comments 745(c)(2), of CFC on the PD states, “CforAT, Adopting Findings ORA, UCAN and Required Pursuant to TURN, agree that PUCode Section 745 CARE and FERA for Implementing customers are Residential TOU “economically Rates, p. 4. but they vulnerable,” D.16-09-016, pp.7-9. argue such as CFC proposed the Commission construction is too D. 17-09-036, p. 33. consider future exclusions for those narrow.” outside CARE eligibility, but whose at 7). Regarding Opening Brief of calculated energy burden would using “energy CFC on the justify relief. as a test burden” Commission’s under Section 745(d) Examination of and 745(2), PUCode Section 745 quotes Issues, pp. 2-5. TURN. Opening Comments at 22). of CFC on the PD Adopting Findings Required Pursuant to PUCode Section 745 for Implementing Residential TOU Rates, p.4 D.16-09-016, pp. 14, 22. D. 17-09-036, pp. 2023. Duplication of Effort (§ 1801.3(f) and § 1802.5): CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Assertion a. Was the Office of Ratepayer Advocates Yes Verified (ORA) a party to the proceeding? b. Were there other parties to the proceeding Yes Verified with positions similar to yours?
CFC proposed the Commission consider future exclusions for those outside CARE eligibility, but whose calculated energy burden would justify relief. Requirements of CA Public Utilities Code Section 745 for Default TOU Rates for Residential Customers, pp. 4-5. Opening Comments of CFC on the PD Adopting Findings Required Pursuant to PUCode Section 745 for Implementing Residential TOU Rates, p. 4. D.16-09-016, pp.7-9. D. 17-09-036, p. 33. Opening Brief of CFC on the Commission’s Examination of PUCode Section 745 Issues, pp. 2-5. Opening Comments of CFC on the PD Adopting Findings Required Pursuant to PUCode Section 745 for Implementing Residential TOU Rates, p.4 D.16-09-016, pp. 14, 22. D. 17-09-036, pp. 2023. a few paragaphs. Regarding the categories of customers that should be studied to comply with Section 745(c)(2), states, “CforAT, ORA, UCAN and TURN, agree that CARE and FERA customers are “economically vulnerable,” but they argue such as construction is too narrow.” at 7). Regarding using “energy burden” as a test under Section 745(d) and 745(2), quotes TURN. at 22). Duplication of Effort (§ 1801.3(f) and § 1802.5): Intervenor’s Assertion CPUC Discussion a. Was the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA) a party to the proceeding? Yes Verified b. Were there other parties to the proceeding with positions similar to yours? Yes Verified