Explanation of the proposed project limits what conditions exist on both ends of the proposed – project, why should the project terminate at these limits, etc. Note that Logical Termini are determined as part of the NEPA process. Other relevant information regarding the issue(s) the project is intended to address Performance in general, what is the major performance goal of the project (e.g. reduce – congestion, improve mobility, reduce crashes, correct geometric and/or structural deficiencies, etc.). Also list any expected secondary benefits the project is expected to provide. The Project Justification Statement in the Concept Report should not include any information that is not relevant to the to be addressed, including demographics/census information, description of possible solutions, etc. Existing conditions: A brief general description of the project location as it currently is, including lanes, sidewalks, major intersections, structures, and major utilities in project area. Other projects in the area: List other projects in the area; include PI numbers and brief description. MPO: MPO Project ID Regional Commission: RC Project ID Congressional District(s): Federal Oversight: Full Oversight Exempt State Funded Other Projected Traffic: Current Year (20WW): Open Year (20XX): Design Year (20YY): Traffic Projections Performed by: GDOT Office or Consulting Firm name Functional Classification (Mainline): Roadway classifications are maintained by Office of Transportation Data Complete Streets - Bicycle, Pedestrian, and/or Transit Warrants: Warrants met: None Bicycle Pedestrian Transit all that apply. Attach summary of Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Warrant Studies or summarize results here. See Chapter 9 of the GDOT Design Policy Manual for further guidance. Note: If it is not practical to provide appropriate accommodations for GDOT Standard Criteria, Design Variance(s) will be required. Is this a 3R (Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation) Project? No Yes Pavement Evaluation and Recommendations Preliminary Pavement Evaluation Summary Report Required? No Yes Preliminary Pavement Type Selection Report Required? No Yes Feasible Pavement Alternatives: HMA PCC HMA & PCC [HMA = Hot Mix Asphalt; PCC = Portland Cement Concrete] Preliminary Pavement Evaluation Summary and/or Preliminary Pavement Type Selection Reports, if required, should be completed to submission of the Concept Report for approval. The Office of Materials and Testing would prepare either or both of these reports upon request. The pavement report(s) should be attached to the Concept
Explanation of the proposed project limits – what conditions exist on both ends of the proposed project, why should the project terminate at these limits, etc. Note that Logical Termini are determined as part of the NEPA process. Other relevant information regarding the issue(s) the project is intended to address Performance – in general, what is the major performance goal of the project (e.g. reduce congestion, improve mobility, reduce crashes, correct geometric and/or structural deficiencies, etc.). Also list any expected secondary benefits the project is expected to provide. The Project Justification Statement in the Concept Report should not include any information that is not relevant to the to be addressed, including demographics/census information, description of possible solutions, etc. Existing conditions: A brief general description of the project location as it currently is, including lanes, sidewalks, major intersections, structures, and major utilities in project area. Other projects in the area: List other projects in the area; include PI numbers and brief description. MPO: MPO Project ID Regional Commission: RC Project ID Congressional District(s): Federal Oversight: Full Oversight Exempt State Funded Other Projected Traffic: Current Year (20WW): Open Year (20XX): Design Year (20YY): Traffic Projections Performed by: GDOT Office or Consulting Firm name Functional Classification (Mainline): Roadway classifications are maintained by Office of Transportation Data Complete Streets - Bicycle, Pedestrian, and/or Transit Warrants: Warrants met: None Bicycle Pedestrian Transit all that apply. Attach summary of Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Warrant Studies or summarize results here. See Chapter 9 of the GDOT Design Policy Manual for further guidance. Note: If it is not practical to provide appropriate accommodations for GDOT Standard Criteria, Design Variance(s) will be required. Is this a 3R (Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation) Project? No Yes Pavement Evaluation and Recommendations Preliminary Pavement Evaluation Summary Report Required? No Yes Preliminary Pavement Type Selection Report Required? No Yes Feasible Pavement Alternatives: HMA PCC HMA & PCC [HMA = Hot Mix Asphalt; PCC = Portland Cement Concrete] Preliminary Pavement Evaluation Summary and/or Preliminary Pavement Type Selection Reports, if required, should be completed to submission of the Concept Report for approval. The Office of Materials and Testing would prepare either or both of these reports upon request. The pavement report(s) should be attached to the Concept