Part I: General No comments (NC) NC NC NC Conditions Part II: Summary Comments: NC Comments: NC of Receiving Develop scope of work Identify entity for for regional GIS effort GIS/regional Waters to overlay MS4 areas collaboration to assist with georeferenced communities (as in, assessment units, RPCs, SWA, others) impaired waters, and outfalls; then Identify which 303(d) crosscheck with list to use cut off point – 303(d) list to id. Question for EPA What waters (RPCs? DES?) about the waters that came off the most Pay attention to 17 recent list? Would want month timeline as this to pick what makes the idea moves forward most sense? What is a reasonable method? Benefits: All UNH method? communities use same method Assess communities’ GIS capacity some may be – helped by regional
Part I: General Conditions No comments (NC) NC NC NC Part II: Summary of Receiving Waters Comments: Develop scope of work for regional GIS effort to overlay MS4 areas with georeferenced assessment units, impaired waters, and outfalls; then crosscheck with 303(d) list to id. waters (RPCs? DES?) Pay attention to 17 month timeline as this idea moves forward Benefits: All communities use same method NC Comments: Identify entity for GIS/regional collaboration to assist communities (as in, RPCs, SWA, others) Identify which 303(d) list to use – cut off point Question for EPA What about the waters that came off the most recent list? Would want to pick what makes the most sense? What is a reasonable method? UNH method? Assess communities’ GIS capacity – some may be helped by regional NC