Cooperating Teacher/University Supervisor Signature The following level descriptors should be used when completing the rubric. Very Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory Student teacher displays Student teacher displays Student teacher displays Student teacher displays no comprehensive appropriate understanding minimal understanding or incorrect understanding understanding and and application of the and application of the and application of the application of the attribute / attribute / teaching & attribute / teaching & attribute / teaching & teaching & learning learning behavior. learning behavior. learning behavior. behavior. SUMMATIVE EVALUATION This FORM should be DISCUSSED BY COOPERATING tEACHER AND UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR AND DISCUSSED BY THE COOPERATING TEACHER WITH the student teacher in an exit interview. STUDENT NAME DATE COOPERATING TEACHER SCHOOL These evaluations should be based on observations of student teaching activities that indicate potential success in the secondary teaching profession. The following level descriptors should be used when completing the rubric. Outstanding Strong Satisfactory Weak Not Satisfactory Student teacher Student teacher Student teacher Student teacher Student teacher is not able performs the ability performs the ability performs the ability performs the ability to perform the ability, without supervision, with limited with some supervision, with much displays minimal or displays supervision, displays displays some supervision, displays incorrect understanding of comprehensive much understanding of understanding of minimal understanding student characteristics and understanding of student characteristics student characteristics of student does not or minimally student characteristics and relates those to and generally relates characteristics and relate those to learning and relates those to learning goals. those to learning minimally relates goals. learning goals. goals. those to learning goals.
Cooperating Teacher/University Supervisor Signature The following level descriptors should be used when completing the rubric. Very Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory Student teacher displays comprehensive understanding and application of the attribute / teaching & learning behavior. Student teacher displays appropriate understanding and application of the attribute / teaching & learning behavior. Student teacher displays minimal understanding and application of the attribute / teaching & learning behavior. Student teacher displays no or incorrect understanding and application of the attribute / teaching & learning behavior. SUMMATIVE EVALUATION This FORM should be DISCUSSED BY COOPERATING tEACHER AND UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR AND DISCUSSED BY THE COOPERATING TEACHER WITH the student teacher in an exit interview. STUDENT NAME DATE COOPERATING TEACHER SCHOOL These evaluations should be based on observations of student teaching activities that indicate potential success in the secondary teaching profession. The following level descriptors should be used when completing the rubric. Outstanding Strong Satisfactory Weak Not Satisfactory Student teacher performs the ability without supervision, displays comprehensive understanding of student characteristics and relates those to learning goals. Student teacher performs the ability with limited supervision, displays much understanding of student characteristics and relates those to learning goals. Student teacher performs the ability with some supervision, displays some understanding of student characteristics and generally relates those to learning goals. Student teacher performs the ability with much supervision, displays minimal understanding of student characteristics and minimally relates those to learning goals. Student teacher is not able to perform the ability, displays minimal or incorrect understanding of student characteristics and does not or minimally relate those to learning goals.