Cindy: I think we should look at other communities do and adopt a grievance process but not for this round of funding because of time crunch. Travis: Let’s appoint a sub group to look at finding a grievance process Randy: We will look at that going forward. Continue going through comment review. Discussion on TCHC staff being present at the CPRC meeting. James: I will add that staff input is invaluable to understanding from the CPRC Roy: Line 161. Randy: So should collaborative applicant staff be a part. Yes, there are some technical things that we need staff to explain. Randy: What about no other funders are in the room and the collaborative applicant does receive funding. Jason: I think we should have them in the room because they are different in order to provide the service that they are funded to provide. The applicant can create a score card for our own HMIS and Coordinated Assessment card so that we are subject to the same score card process. Jason: No one is competing for the funding that TCHC is getting so it is non competitive. Roy: I don’t have a problem with the Collaborative applicant in the room Patricia Ward: Public Forum is more transparent. I understand you can’t speak freely but you should let people attend and not speak. Charlie Parker: Committee makes recommendations and the council will approve the allocations. Randy: That falls in with the grievance discussion. Continue reviewing the comments. Kelly Allen Gray left the meeting. Karl Travis left the meeting. Randy: Any other comments on the charter document? Roy Brooks: to approve Jason: Second James: Voted nay due to his concerns about CPRC not allowing for CoC Board to be verbalized as the final deciding body.
Cindy: I think we should look at other communities do and adopt a grievance process but not for this round of funding because of time crunch. Travis: Let’s appoint a sub group to look at finding a grievance process Randy: We will look at that going forward. Continue going through comment review. Discussion on TCHC staff being present at the CPRC meeting. James: I will add that staff input is invaluable to understanding from the CPRC Roy: Line 161. Randy: So should collaborative applicant staff be a part. Yes, there are some technical things that we need staff to explain. Randy: What about no other funders are in the room and the collaborative applicant does receive funding. Jason: I think we should have them in the room because they are different in order to provide the service that they are funded to provide. The applicant can create a score card for our own HMIS and Coordinated Assessment card so that we are subject to the same score card process. Jason: No one is competing for the funding that TCHC is getting so it is non competitive. Roy: I don’t have a problem with the Collaborative applicant in the room Patricia Ward: Public Forum is more transparent. I understand you can’t speak freely but you should let people attend and not speak. Charlie Parker: Committee makes recommendations and the council will approve the allocations. Randy: That falls in with the grievance discussion. Continue reviewing the comments. Kelly Allen Gray left the meeting. Karl Travis left the meeting. Randy: Any other comments on the charter document? Roy Brooks: to approve Jason: Second James: Voted nay due to his concerns about CPRC not allowing for CoC Board to be verbalized as the final deciding body.