Based on the In 2013, we By 2013, 40% of our 2012 FAA would like to students will achieve scores, we have 40% of a level 4-6 had 5(33%) our FAA on the FAA math of our students assessment. students score level score level 4-6 in math. 4-6 in math. 1B.2. 1B.2. 1B.2. 1B.2. 1B.2. 1B.3. 1B.3. 1B.3. 1B.3. 1B.3. on the analysis of student achievement data and Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Process Used to Determine Evaluation Tool reference to Questions,” identify and define areas Responsible for Monitoring Effectiveness of Strategy “Guiding in need of improvement for the following group: 2A. FCAT 2.0: Students scoring at or above 2A.1. 2A.1. 2A.1. 2A.1. 2A.1. Student needs enrichment Project based learning opportunities Leadership Team; Teachers and CWTs focusing on instructional Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in mathematics. opportunities and exposure to Coaches practices and instructional Common Core Math Standards Use of manipulatives with strategies Mathematics Goal 2012 Current 2013 Expected order questioning, which will Level of Level of #2A: include Common Core Standards CWT data analysis and feedback Performance:* Performance:* Based on the In 2013, we By 2013, 15% of our Benchmark Data chart review 2012 FCAT, would like to students will achieve we had have (15%) a level 4 and 5 on the Data Chats (Administrators with 31(9%) of of our FCAT math Teachers, Teachers with our students students assessment. Students) score level 4 score level 4 or 5 in math. or 5 in math. 2A.2. 2A.2. 2A.2. 2A.2. 2A.2. Students need exposure to high Provide students with problem Enrichment Activities level Instructional Strategies daily solving assignments that require to maintain and increase analytical two and three step interpretive, and CWTs focusing on instructional and problem solving skills analytical critical thinking skills. practices, instructional strategies and the learner Provide students the opportunity to enhance analysis skills through CWT data analysis and feedback graphic organizers and real world
By 2013, 40% of our students will achieve a level 4-6 on the FAA math assessment. Based on the 2012 FAA scores, we had 5(33%) of our students score level 4-6 in math. In 2013, we would like to have 40% of our FAA students score level 4-6 in math. 1B.2. 1B.2. 1B.2. 1B.2. 1B.2. 1B.3. 1B.3. 1B.3. 1B.3. 1B.3. on the analysis of student achievement data and reference to “Guiding Questions,” identify and define areas in need of improvement for the following group: Anticipated Barrier Strategy Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy Evaluation Tool 2A. FCAT 2.0: Students scoring at or above Achievement Levels 4 and 5 in mathematics. 2A.1. Student needs enrichment opportunities and exposure to Common Core Math Standards 2A.1. Project based learning opportunities Use of manipulatives with questioning, which will include Common Core Standards 2A.1. Leadership Team; Teachers and Coaches 2A.1. CWTs focusing on instructional practices and instructional strategies CWT data analysis and feedback Benchmark Data chart review Data Chats (Administrators with Teachers, Teachers with Students) 2A.1. Mathematics Goal #2A: By 2013, 15% of our students will achieve a level 4 and 5 on the FCAT math assessment. 2012 Current Level of Performance:* 2013 Expected Level of Performance:* Based on the 2012 FCAT, we had 31(9%) of our students score level 4 or 5 in math. In 2013, we would like to have (15%) of our students score level 4 or 5 in math. 2A.2. Students need exposure to high level Instructional Strategies daily to maintain and increase analytical and problem solving skills 2A.2. Provide students with problem solving assignments that require two and three step interpretive, and analytical critical thinking skills. Provide students the opportunity to enhance analysis skills through graphic organizers and real world order 2A.2. 2A.2. Enrichment Activities CWTs focusing on instructional practices, instructional strategies and the learner CWT data analysis and feedback 2A.2.