6842 John 274.06 Technical term used Either provide a Revise generally – Coffey agree with with incomplete or definition for comment, TGax missing description: based spatial reuse editor shall spatial or delete all incorporate reuse". The reference mention of it from changes in given is 27.9 but I the draft. don't find it there. 5872 276.40 In Spatial Reuse field, Use Set to value 1 Revise generally James – June agree with value 1 to 14 are to 14 Wang comment, TGax missing corresponding to editor shall SRP value (see incorporate Table 28-19 changes in (Spatial Reuse subfield encoding)) for SRP-based SR operation. 5871 274.06 values 1 to 14 are Use Set to value 1 Revise generally James – June agree with missing in for to 14 Wang comment, TGax Spatial reuse corresponding to editor shall SRP value (see incorporate Table 28-19 changes in (Spatial Reuse subfield encoding)) for SRP-based SR operation. Revise agree with 6845 John 274.10 "NOTE--This part Delete spatial – Coffey the part of the needs further reuse, of whatever comment that notes development." Well, variety, and all that some yes! As an aside references to it in behaviour is not (though I think a the draft. defined, but relevant one) why disagree with the does it need more commenter’s proposed resolution development at this and instead, late stage? It must be propose an connected with the alternative solution complexity of the which is in line with spatial reuse problem, the vast majority of which is on a vastly proposed resolutions from diffreent scale to the dozens of other regular modes we commenters on the consider. Adding a same topic, which new 1024-QAM MCS resolution is to or another provide descriptive behavioural text to mode mostly resolve the lack of affects individual links completeness in and so any problems the current draft, are largely contained. TGax editor shall Not so with spatial incorporate
6842 John Coffey 274.06 Technical term used with incomplete or missing description: spatial reuse". The reference given is 27.9 but I don't find it there. Either provide a definition for spatial reuse or delete all mention of it from the draft. Revise – generally agree with comment, TGax editor shall incorporate changes in 5872 James June Wang 276.40 In Spatial Reuse field, value 1 to 14 are missing Use Set to value 1 to 14 corresponding to SRP value (see Table 28-19 (Spatial Reuse subfield encoding)) for SRP-based SR operation. Revise – generally agree with comment, TGax editor shall incorporate changes in 5871 James June Wang 274.06 values 1 to 14 are missing in for Spatial reuse Use Set to value 1 to 14 corresponding to SRP value (see Table 28-19 (Spatial Reuse subfield encoding)) for SRP-based SR operation. Revise – generally agree with comment, TGax editor shall incorporate changes in 6845 John Coffey 274.10 "NOTE--This part needs further development." Well, yes! As an aside (though I think a relevant one) why does it need more development at this late stage? It must be connected with the complexity of the spatial reuse problem, which is on a vastly diffreent scale to the regular modes we consider. Adding a new 1024-QAM MCS or another mode mostly affects individual links and so any problems are largely contained. Not so with spatial Delete spatial reuse, of whatever variety, and all references to it in the draft. Revise – agree with the part of the comment that notes that some behaviour is not defined, but disagree with the commenter’s proposed resolution and instead, propose an alternative solution which is in line with the vast majority of proposed resolutions from dozens of other commenters on the same topic, which resolution is to provide descriptive behavioural text to resolve the lack of completeness in the current draft, TGax editor shall incorporate based