113.Criterion 2 e) refers to published Warwickshire Landscape Guidelines. This should be clarified as the Warwickshire County Council Landscape Guidelines. 114.Criterion 2 f) uses the term which is a value judgment and should be “enjoys” reworded to reflect a concern regarding the resistance of intrusive features. 115.Criteria 2 i) requires an archaeological survey in all cases which is unreasonable. The criterion should be reworded to reflect care is taken when there is a likelihood of archaeological deposits in the immediate vicinity of a site. 116.Criterion 2 j) is effectively a repeat of criterion b) and should be removed. RECOMMENDATION 18 Delete the last sentence in criterion 1. Under (2) Responding to local character: a) is the opening paragraph and should not have a letter, the principles below should then all be ‘re-lettered’, accordingly. In criterion 2 e) clarify that it is the Landscape Guidelines” “Warwickshire insert by Warwickshire County Council.” “prepared In criterion 2 f) delete continue to be enjoyed” insert maintained free “can “are from intrusive development.” Alter criterion i) as follows: When there are archaeological deposits which “ may be affected or it is considered there may be such deposits in the vicinity then a full survey shall be carried out and adequate protection afforded where necessary.” Delete criterion 2 j). Policy ENV4: Protecting designated heritage assets 117.This is a repeat of policies in the NPPF relating to and enhancing “Conserving the historic environment and Core Strategy policy CS.8 Environment”. It ” “Historic does not add anything and should be deleted in the interests of clarity. 118.It is, however, appropriate to make reference and signpost these higher policies. RECOMMENDATION 19 Delete ENV4” from the “Policy Delete the policy wording ENV4 but retain the supporting paragraphs as follows:
113.Criterion 2 e) refers to published Warwickshire Landscape Guidelines. This should be clarified as the Warwickshire County Council Landscape Guidelines. 114.Criterion 2 f) uses the term “enjoys” which is a value judgment and should be reworded to reflect a concern regarding the resistance of intrusive features. 115.Criteria 2 i) requires an archaeological survey in all cases which is unreasonable. The criterion should be reworded to reflect care is taken when there is a likelihood of archaeological deposits in the immediate vicinity of a site. 116.Criterion 2 j) is effectively a repeat of criterion b) and should be removed. RECOMMENDATION 18 Delete the last sentence in criterion 1. Under (2) Responding to local character: a) is the opening paragraph and should not have a letter, the principles below should then all be ‘re-lettered’, accordingly. In criterion 2 e) clarify that it is the “Warwickshire Landscape Guidelines” insert “prepared by Warwickshire County Council.” In criterion 2 f) delete “can continue to be enjoyed” insert “are maintained free from intrusive development.” Alter criterion i) as follows: “ When there are archaeological deposits which may be affected or it is considered there may be such deposits in the vicinity then a full survey shall be carried out and adequate protection afforded where necessary.” Delete criterion 2 j). Policy ENV4: Protecting designated heritage assets 117.This is a repeat of policies in the NPPF relating to “Conserving and enhancing the historic environment ” and Core Strategy policy CS.8 “Historic Environment”. It does not add anything and should be deleted in the interests of clarity. 118.It is, however, appropriate to make reference and signpost these higher policies. RECOMMENDATION 19 Delete “Policy ENV4” from the Delete the policy wording ENV4 but retain the supporting paragraphs as follows: