Compatibility Yes Yes Yes Functionalities that include a Further consideration Further with traffic human driver, are in general necessary to reflect consideration law (WP.1) allowed by the road traffic driverless systems before a necessary to conventions, but the conclusion can be made. reflect implementation in local traffic driverless rules is not harmonized. Driver systems before might not be able, for example, to a conclusion perform other activities than can be made. driving, thus national traffic laws might need amendments. Following principles have been agreed upon in the WP.1 regarding side activities: Principle 1: activities do not prevent the driver from responding to demands from the vehicle systems for taking over the driving task, and Principle 2: these activities are consistent with the prescribed use of the vehicle systems and their defined functions. Summary of the current conditions and the issues to be discussed (specific use cases) Already Automated put into parking by the driver’s Requirements need to be developed Parking area practice: remote control (monitoring) Control Parking, CAT. A ACSF amendment of R79) Parking Assist Roads Categories B2, C, D and E* under Categories B2, B2+E under Requirements need to be developed LKA (draft exclusively for ACSF (amendment of R79) ACSF (amendment of R79) standards) motor vehicles Category B1 in combination with with physical ACC (no specific longitudinal control separation from performance oncoming requirements) ACC+ACSF ACSF Cat. B2* traffic (e.g. (Cat.B1, motorway) Cat.C [Basic
Compatibility with traffic law (WP.1) Yes Yes Yes Functionalities that include a human driver, are in general allowed by the road traffic conventions, but the implementation in local traffic rules is not harmonized. Driver might not be able, for example, to perform other activities than driving, thus national traffic laws might need amendments. Following principles have been agreed upon in the WP.1 regarding side activities: Principle 1: activities do not prevent the driver from responding to demands from the vehicle systems for taking over the driving task, and Principle 2: these activities are consistent with the prescribed use of the vehicle systems and their defined functions. Further consideration necessary to reflect driverless systems before a conclusion can be made. Further consideration necessary to reflect driverless systems before a conclusion can be made. Summary of the current conditions and the issues to be discussed (specific use cases) Parking area Already put into practice: Parking Assist LKA (draft standards) ACC (no specific performance requirements) Automated parking by the driver’s remote control (monitoring) Control Parking, CAT. A ACSF amendment of R79) Requirements need to be developed Roads exclusively for motor vehicles with physical separation from oncoming traffic (e.g. motorway) Categories B2, C, D and E* under ACSF (amendment of R79) Category B1 in combination with longitudinal control Categories B2, B2+E under ACSF (amendment of R79) Requirements need to be developed ACC+ACSF (Cat.B1, Cat.C [Basic ACSF Cat. B2*