We are small enough that we shouldn’t pay for it. It has data on where they stopped reading the email, etc… Welcoming new members is a manual process done by Matt and Jay. Utilize a private Facebook group, not a Facebook Page. Groups connect you directly to your members. Members are able to ask questions. Might be very valuable to the smaller business owners. How much this cost? All our proposals are custom, would have another meeting to review the proposal. And how do we measure success? Are our events better attended? Has membership grown? Are members more engaged (using the Facebook group)? She will have a proposal to us within a week. The Board found the discussion helpful. Most ideas we have discussed before, but we haven’t had the inertia to do those ideas. Programs Update: Lucia Villalobos Matt found more interest with his coworkers for the to do When Your Forecast Is Wrong?” “What Education Update: Pru Strain-Gamso Two classes starting in April. Should she start scheduling the classes for Fall Semester 2018. Yes, and she will focus on that instead of the CBAR. Finance: Tom Cook Pretty close to breaking even. Pru has done a good job on getting more classes. Peter is teaching a class at Crown Equipment. Should get $1600 from corporate from that, and we picked up new members. Tom submitted a pricing proposal that was very similar to one that Jason had put together. Rosch has agreed to pay the higher price. Proposal is for the chapter to make 30% profit on every class. That’s cheaper than they could buy from corporate. add $3000 to our Chapter. Need to have consistent pricing, including shipping pricing considerations. We would want the big companies to purchase materials from us, instead of corporate. It’s a savings for them, and an increase in revenue for us. We don’t put any margin on the shipping. We would tax shipping on top. and Lilly are looking at shipping materials overseas. They pick the shipping location and they have to pay the freight no matter where it goes. This is for materials only, if you’re not taking the classes. We can do this for the materials, but for the exams, we need to look at that again. We have just now gotten into selling the exams ourselves. Exams are more effort because we have to submit each person ourselves. Motion: Move that we approve the Tom’s Pricing Proposal on Direct Sale of Materials for Courseware only.
We are small enough that we shouldn’t pay for it. It has data on where they stopped reading the email, etc… Welcoming new members is a manual process done by Matt and Jay. Utilize a private Facebook group, not a Facebook Page. Groups connect you directly to your members. Members are able to ask questions. Might be very valuable to the smaller business owners. How much this cost? All our proposals are custom, would have another meeting to review the proposal. And how do we measure success? Are our events better attended? Has membership grown? Are members more engaged (using the Facebook group)? She will have a proposal to us within a week. The Board found the discussion helpful. Most ideas we have discussed before, but we haven’t had the inertia to do those ideas. Programs Update: Lucia Villalobos Matt found more interest with his coworkers for the “What to do When Your Forecast Is Wrong?” Education Update: Pru Strain-Gamso Two classes starting in April. Should she start scheduling the classes for Fall Semester 2018. Yes, and she will focus on that instead of the CBAR. Finance: Tom Cook Pretty close to breaking even. Pru has done a good job on getting more classes. Peter is teaching a class at Crown Equipment. Should get $1600 from corporate from that, and we picked up new members. Tom submitted a pricing proposal that was very similar to one that Jason had put together. Rosch has agreed to pay the higher price. Proposal is for the chapter to make 30% profit on every class. That’s cheaper than they could buy from corporate. add $3000 to our Chapter. Need to have consistent pricing, including shipping pricing considerations. We would want the big companies to purchase materials from us, instead of corporate. It’s a savings for them, and an increase in revenue for us. We don’t put any margin on the shipping. We would tax shipping on top. and Lilly are looking at shipping materials overseas. They pick the shipping location and they have to pay the freight no matter where it goes. This is for materials only, if you’re not taking the classes. We can do this for the materials, but for the exams, we need to look at that again. We have just now gotten into selling the exams ourselves. Exams are more effort because we have to submit each person ourselves. Motion: Move that we approve the Tom’s Pricing Proposal on Direct Sale of Materials for Courseware only.