Concern on the addition of the makes it harder to understand. ‘i.e.’, Removing the parenthetical was agreed to be better. on if there were any other Trigger frame” that need to be removed. “FTM The editor instructions were clarified to indicate more changes were being made other ITEM #4 : Dorothy to make a motion to incorporate the changes for – No Objection to preparing a motion for in week. Review Doc: 11-15/0910r2 Eitan, ALECSANDER Abstract: Current FTM defines resolution of 100 ps for the time-stamps, which is insufficient for many use-cases. This contribution changes the FTM specifications to 1 ps resolution to address this issue. It uses REVmc Draft 4.1 as baseline. related CID the proposed Changes. ITEM #5: Dorothy Prepare a motion to incorporate document 11-15/0910r2 into – the objection to include in a motion. Review doc: 11-15/1073r1 Naveen KAKAMI document header and footer need to be corrected. Neighbour Report changes were described. questions found in D4.0 were addressed in the changes being proposed after the addition of was added to Report Element” in several locations. “element” “Neighbour on the change to equation variable inclusion and definition. TFTM_1 comment will most likely be made to clarify the definition in the next ballot. ACTION ITEM #6: Dorothy Prepare a motion to incorporate document 11-15/1073r2 – into the Check on Other Location topics: A document for Capability + Neighbor Report + FTM Ganesh VENKATESAN” “RM – has not been posted, but will be posted and discussed on a teleconference. Motion 153: Editorial Comments Approve the comment resolutions in the , - ready for motion”, - speculatively edited - updated “Editorials” “Editorials “Editorials resolution”, and style” tabs in “Editorials – and incorporate the indicated text changes into the TGmc draft. Moved: Adrian STEPHENS 2nd: Jon ROSDAHL Discussion no discussion – Results: 12-0-0 MOTION PASSES Review updated Agenda document that will be posted R5: Review motions for tomorrow see – Review doc:11-15/1010r10 Adrian STEPHENS Continue we left off CID 6068 (MAC) Review comment There was a conversation on if the Null Terminated String notation was needed.
Concern on the addition of the ‘i.e.’, makes it harder to understand. Removing the parenthetical was agreed to be better. on if there were any other “FTM Trigger frame” that need to be removed. The editor instructions were clarified to indicate more changes were being made other ITEM #4 : Dorothy – to make a motion to incorporate the changes for No Objection to preparing a motion for in week. Review Doc: 11-15/0910r2 Eitan, ALECSANDER Abstract: Current FTM defines resolution of 100 ps for the time-stamps, which is insufficient for many use-cases. This contribution changes the FTM specifications to 1 ps resolution to address this issue. It uses REVmc Draft 4.1 as baseline. related CID the proposed Changes. ITEM #5: Dorothy – Prepare a motion to incorporate document 11-15/0910r2 into the objection to include in a motion. Review doc: 11-15/1073r1 Naveen KAKAMI document header and footer need to be corrected. Neighbour Report changes were described. questions found in D4.0 were addressed in the changes being proposed after the addition of “element” was added to “Neighbour Report Element” in several locations. on the change to equation variable TFTM_1 inclusion and definition. comment will most likely be made to clarify the definition in the next ballot. ACTION ITEM #6: Dorothy – Prepare a motion to incorporate document 11-15/1073r2 into the Check on Other Location topics: A document for “RM Capability + Neighbor Report + FTM – Ganesh VENKATESAN” has not been posted, but will be posted and discussed on a teleconference. Motion 153: Editorial Comments Approve the comment resolutions in the “Editorials” , “Editorials - ready for motion”, “Editorials - speculatively edited - updated resolution”, and “Editorials – style” tabs in and incorporate the indicated text changes into the TGmc draft. Moved: Adrian STEPHENS 2nd: Jon ROSDAHL Discussion – no discussion Results: 12-0-0 MOTION PASSES Review updated Agenda document that will be posted R5: Review motions for tomorrow – see Review doc:11-15/1010r10 Adrian STEPHENS Continue we left off CID 6068 (MAC) Review comment There was a conversation on if the Null Terminated String notation was needed.