1 person said should be according to units held 1 person said structure should always be according to rights held.’ ‘the 1 person said form of weighting.’ ‘some Question 3 - It is proposed that the structure remains as is with 5 active graziers, 3 the landowners and 2 non voting stakeholders. Question 3 - Do you support this proposal? Yes - 18 No - 3 1 person said no all current active graziers + the 3 non-active + only NE – 1 person said active graziers + 3 non-active + owner.’ ‘all 1 person said & 5’. ‘7 Question 4 - It is proposed that both ENPA and NE will sit as non-voting stakeholders. Question 4 Do you support this proposal? – Yes - 19 No - 2 1 person said only NE not ENPA 1 person said National Park should not vote as they are already involved with BLC ‘Exmoor and would have too much influence as a whole.’ (I think the answer should then read yes – as the proposal is for ENPA to sit as non-voting members). Original Question 4 Stakeholders non contentious so carried forward from previous – – response. Original Question 5 Functions accepted with the one amendment from the Landowner). – – Original Question 6 Regulations accepted with one amendment from the Landowner). – – Question 5 - The landlord proposed that on year to year grazing matters, decisions could be made by a simple majority, but all other decisions should have substantive support and therefore there should be 80% support on all other matters/decisions. Furthermore they suggested that with the current proposed membership structure decisions could be made with 6 of the 9 vote holders present or holding proxy’s. Question 5 - Do you support this amended proposal? Yes - 17 No - 4 1 person said agree with graziers having a simple majority for grazing issues only and 80% for all other decisions disagree with paragraph 2 as only 66% at worst not 80% agreed. – 1 person said majority with casting vote by landowner or chairman’. ‘simple
1 person said should be according to units held 1 person said ‘the structure should always be according to rights held.’ 1 person said ‘some form of weighting.’ Question 3 - It is proposed that the structure remains as is with 5 active graziers, 3 the landowners and 2 non voting stakeholders. Question 3 - Do you support this proposal? Yes - 18 No - 3 1 person said no – all current active graziers + the 3 non-active + only NE 1 person said ‘all active graziers + 3 non-active + owner.’ 1 person said ‘7 & 5’. Question 4 - It is proposed that both ENPA and NE will sit as non-voting stakeholders. Question 4 – Do you support this proposal? Yes - 19 No - 2 1 person said only NE not ENPA 1 person said ‘Exmoor National Park should not vote as they are already involved with BLC and would have too much influence as a whole.’ – (I think the answer should then read yes as the proposal is for ENPA to sit as non-voting members). Original Question 4 – Stakeholders – non contentious so carried forward from previous response. Original Question 5 – Functions – accepted with the one amendment from the Landowner). Original Question 6 – Regulations – accepted with one amendment from the Landowner). Question 5 - The landlord proposed that on year to year grazing matters, decisions could be made by a simple majority, but all other decisions should have substantive support and therefore there should be 80% support on all other matters/decisions. Furthermore they suggested that with the current proposed membership structure decisions could be made with 6 of the 9 vote holders present or holding proxy’s. Question 5 - Do you support this amended proposal? Yes - 17 No - 4 1 person said agree with graziers having a simple majority for grazing issues only and 80% for all other decisions – disagree with paragraph 2 as only 66% at worst not 80% agreed. 1 person said ‘simple majority with casting vote by landowner or chairman’.