Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding R. 14-08-020 Verified number: 6. Date of ALJ ruling: 2/18/15 Verified 7. Based on another CPUC determination N/A (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible Yes government entity status? Showing of or §1803.1(b)) “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding R. 14-08-020 Verified number: 10. Date of ALJ ruling: 2/18/15 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination N/A (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D. 17-05-013 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: 5/18/2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: 7/11/2017 Verified and amended on January 31, 2018. 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059) Specific References to CPUC Intervenor’s Claimed Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Discussion Contribution(s) A decision 1. Gas Distribution acknowledging Maintenance Expenditures the position of (GDST) an intervenor is CFC reviewed and analyzed not indicative, CFC- Leak Management Corrective PGE’s proposed expenditures on its own, of Maintenance Expenses, pp.10-14 on gas distribution system, and the intervenor’s prepared Testimony substantial
Showing of eligible customer status (§ 1802(b) or eligible local government entity status (§§ 1802(d), 1802.4): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R. 14-08-020 Verified 6. Date of ALJ ruling: 2/18/15 Verified 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): N/A 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer status or eligible government entity status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§1802(h) or §1803.1(b)) 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R. 14-08-020 Verified 10. Date of ALJ ruling: 2/18/15 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): N/A 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D. 17-05-013 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: 5/18/2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: 7/11/2017 Verified and amended on January 31, 2018. 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(j), § 1803(a), 1803.1(a) and D.98-04-059) Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion 1. Gas Distribution Maintenance Expenditures (GDST) CFC reviewed and analyzed PGE’s proposed expenditures on gas distribution system, and prepared Testimony CFC- Leak Management Corrective Maintenance Expenses, pp.10-14 A decision acknowledging the position of an intervenor is not indicative, on its own, of the intervenor’s substantial