Attachment A: Draft MTR Evaluation Framework MTR Primary ToR Mid-Term Review Questions Additional Secondary Questions Data and Information Questions Sources and Meetings To what extent has the program made appropriate choices Evaluation Are the MPW and partners satisfied with the quality of technical Document review about the use of labour-based approaches? Question 1 advice, training, and other activities delivered by the program? MPW and District Officials To what extent is the MPW supporting the labour-based approach is interviews supported (including ensuring that practices and procedures are Interviews with local embedded within the MPW). contractors and regional To what extent R4D program address the above cross-cutting issues. engineers Are the workers and employers’ organizations involved in the design Case Studies of regional sites and implementation of the R4D program? Has and to what extent the ILO labour standards and tripartism principles been mainstreamed in the area of rural road works? To what extent is the program contributing to the effective use Evaluation Does the current implementation model promote sustainability? What MPW, ADN, DFAT, R4D of contractors within MPW? What factors may limit the local Question 2 other modalities and approaches are required (or are in need of industry? District Officials consideration)? Contractors/regional engineers How appropriate are R4D’s capacity building approaches with Is the R4D program design (objectives, strategies, outputs, activities) MoUs between ILO and MPW Evaluation the Ministry of Public Works? To what extent are we making relevant to the situation on the ground? Does the design need to Question 3 particularly on the provision of adequate progress toward achieving outcomes 1 and 3 be modified in the second half of the project? (Relevance) MPW personnel (both at (intermediate outcomes and results)? national and at regions/districts What progress has been made towards achieving the defined outcomes? How is the program contributing to achieving the GoTL levels) whether these will be priority and national development plan, DFAT’s plan, and relevant ILO realised, DWCP outcomes? What are the main constraints, problems, and Institutional support (support to areas in need of further attention both internal and external? Rural Master Plan and capacity (Effectiveness) development approach) To what extent the MPW has institutionalizing the support provided by R4D to date including ensuring that practices and procedures are
Attachment A: Draft MTR Evaluation Framework MTR Primary Questions ToR Mid-Term Review Questions Additional Secondary Questions Data and Information Sources and Meetings Evaluation Question 1 To what extent has the program made appropriate choices about the use of labour-based approaches? Are the MPW and partners satisfied with the quality of technical advice, training, and other activities delivered by the program? To what extent is the MPW supporting the labour-based approach is supported (including ensuring that practices and procedures are embedded within the MPW). To what extent R4D program address the above cross-cutting issues. Are the workers and employers’ organizations involved in the design and implementation of the R4D program? Has and to what extent the ILO labour standards and tripartism principles been mainstreamed in the area of rural road works? Document review MPW and District Officials interviews Interviews with local contractors and regional engineers Case Studies of regional sites Evaluation Question 2 To what extent is the program contributing to the effective use of contractors within MPW? What factors may limit the local industry? Does the current implementation model promote sustainability? What other modalities and approaches are required (or are in need of consideration)? MPW, ADN, DFAT, R4D District Officials Contractors/regional engineers Evaluation Question 3 How appropriate are R4D’s capacity building approaches with the Ministry of Public Works? To what extent are we making adequate progress toward achieving outcomes 1 and 3 (intermediate outcomes and results)? Is the R4D program design (objectives, strategies, outputs, activities) relevant to the situation on the ground? Does the design need to be modified in the second half of the project? (Relevance) What progress has been made towards achieving the defined outcomes? How is the program contributing to achieving the GoTL priority and national development plan, DFAT’s plan, and relevant ILO DWCP outcomes? What are the main constraints, problems, and areas in need of further attention both internal and external? (Effectiveness) To what extent the MPW has institutionalizing the support provided by R4D to date including ensuring that practices and procedures are MoUs between ILO and MPW particularly on the provision of MPW personnel (both at national and at regions/districts levels) whether these will be realised, Institutional support (support to Rural Master Plan and capacity development approach)