2021 COP4 Article 21 reporting: First COP4 initiates the first All Stage 1 reports to be full report by 31 Dec monitoring report, which submitted to the will feed into Secretariat (except for effectiveness evaluation global monitoring report) 2022 Article 21 national Prepare monitoring June: stage 1 completed reports compiled. report and submission to December: Secretariat to Emission/ release EE group to feed into EE develop preliminary inventories start to be report - to address Art analysis. submitted 22 para 2 in facilitating Committee to the evaluation review the information. 2023 COP5 Biennial report COP5 welcomes COP5 welcomes EE NAP review monitoring report. report. e. Arrangements for conducting the effectiveness evaluation The expert group understood that, by mandating the group to draft terms of reference for the committee developing the first effectiveness evaluation, COP has already implicitly decided to set up an effectiveness evaluation committee. The process flow need to be reviewed further to specify who does what for information collection, compilation, synthesis and evaluation f. Terms of reference for the committee developing the first effectiveness evaluation Taking into consideration the experience of the Stockholm Convention, the group developed draft terms of reference for an effectiveness evaluation committee as annexed to this report. Recommendations for the effectiveness evaluation framework. The ad-hoc expert group developed an initial list of indicators for the first effectiveness evaluation. Further work is needed to review the data limitation and baseline for these indicators, as well as to develop methods to analyse the article-by-article indicators for the overall effectiveness evaluation, and to consider the use of monitoring information in effectiveness evaluation. The ad-hoc expert group recommend two-stage process and schedule for the first effectiveness evaluation as described in the meeting report. The Conference of the Parties should consider the proposal with a view to establishing an effectiveness evaluation framework at its third meeting. The terms of reference of an effectiveness evaluation committee, as proposed in the report, should be included in the effectiveness evaluation framework.
2021 COP4 Article 21 reporting: First full report by 31 Dec COP4 initiates the first monitoring report, which will feed into effectiveness evaluation All Stage 1 reports to be submitted to the Secretariat (except for global monitoring report) 2022 Article 21 national reports compiled. Emission/ release inventories start to be submitted Prepare monitoring report and submission to EE group to feed into EE report - to address Art 22 para 2 in facilitating the evaluation June: stage 1 completed December: Secretariat to develop preliminary analysis. Committee to review the information. 2023 COP5 Biennial report NAP review COP5 welcomes monitoring report. COP5 welcomes EE report. e. Arrangements for conducting the effectiveness evaluation The expert group understood that, by mandating the group to draft terms of reference for the committee developing the first effectiveness evaluation, COP has already implicitly decided to set up an effectiveness evaluation committee. The process flow need to be reviewed further to specify who does what for information collection, compilation, synthesis and evaluation f. Terms of reference for the committee developing the first effectiveness evaluation Taking into consideration the experience of the Stockholm Convention, the group developed draft terms of reference for an effectiveness evaluation committee as annexed to this report. Recommendations for the effectiveness evaluation framework. The ad-hoc expert group developed an initial list of indicators for the first effectiveness evaluation. Further work is needed to review the data limitation and baseline for these indicators, as well as to develop methods to analyse the article-by-article indicators for the overall effectiveness evaluation, and to consider the use of monitoring information in effectiveness evaluation. The ad-hoc expert group recommend two-stage process and schedule for the first effectiveness evaluation as described in the meeting report. The Conference of the Parties should consider the proposal with a view to establishing an effectiveness evaluation framework at its third meeting. The terms of reference of an effectiveness evaluation committee, as proposed in the report, should be included in the effectiveness evaluation framework.