0.927 11.84 <0.0001 0.0001 EB = 20.96 + 18.30x12 + 29.77x22 + 31.41x32 y Table S3. Comparison between the proposed method and those found in the literature based on DLLME extraction. Extraction LOD Water Instrumental Optimisation technique Analytes %RSD %Rec Ref. matrices analysis process (ng L-1) (extraction/disperser solvents) DPMI, ADBI, AHMI, UA-DLLME EXA, MA, HHCB, Tap, sea, river This GC-MS DoE 0.004-54 1-15 71-118 MX, AHTN, MM, and wastewater work (CF/ACN) MT, MK, EB DLLME ADBI, AHMI, ATII, Sea, river, lake GC-MS DoE 8-63 2-14 60-93 [36] HHCB, AHTN (TCC/MeOH) UA-DLLME DPMI, ADBI, AHMI, River, GC-MS 0.2 2-11 75-90 [34] ATII, HHCB, AHTN wastewater (TCC/IPA) DLLME MA, MX, MM, MT, River, sea, GC-MS 4-33 3-14 87-93 [21] MK wastewater (CF/Acet) CF chloroform; ACN - acetonitrile; TCC - carbon tetrachloride; MeOH - methanol; IPA - isopropyl alcohol; Acet - acetone. –
EB 0.927 11.84 <0.0001 0.0001 y = 20.96 + 18.30x12 + 29.77x22 + 31.41x32 Table S3. Comparison between the proposed method and those found in the literature based on DLLME extraction. Analytes Water matrices Extraction technique (extraction/disperser solvents) Instrumental analysis Optimisation process LOD (ng L-1) %RSD %Rec Ref. DPMI, ADBI, AHMI, EXA, MA, HHCB, MX, AHTN, MM, MT, MK, EB Tap, sea, river and wastewater UA-DLLME (CF/ACN) GC-MS DoE 0.004-54 1-15 71-118 This work ADBI, AHMI, ATII, HHCB, AHTN Sea, river, lake DLLME (TCC/MeOH) GC-MS DoE 8-63 2-14 60-93 [36] DPMI, ADBI, AHMI, ATII, HHCB, AHTN River, wastewater UA-DLLME (TCC/IPA) GC-MS 0.2 2-11 75-90 [34] MA, MX, MM, MT, MK River, sea, wastewater DLLME (CF/Acet) GC-MS 4-33 3-14 87-93 [21] CF – chloroform; ACN - acetonitrile; TCC - carbon tetrachloride; MeOH - methanol; IPA - isopropyl alcohol; Acet - acetone.