Assessment Rubric for Comprehensive Exam Results Student’s Name: Banner ID: U Degree: MS PhD Area of Concentration, if applicable: Date: Criteria Advanced (3) Intermediate (2) Beginner (1) Responses reveal a Responses reveal a Responses are brief and/or comprehensive level of satisfactory breadth of reveal a narrow level of I Completeness and Breadth knowledge of the topic at knowledge of the topic at knowledge of the topic at hand. hand. hand. Responses demonstrate Responses demonstrate depth of knowledge and the Responses are inaccurate II Accuracy and depth of knowledge of the ability to analyze and and/or superficial. topic at hand. synthesize information. Responses contain all of Responses are poorly Responses are logical and III Logic and Organization the elements but take effort organized and difficult to easy to follow. to follow. follow. Criteria Committee Approvals: Signatures (Please print) I II III Overall Chair (Examining Committee) (Examining Committee) Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Criteria Averages Please complete this assessment form for each graduate student in your program upon completion of Comprehensive Exam. Return this completed Assessment Rubric and the Comprehensive Exam Results form to your Graduate Coordinator or designee. Your graduate coordinator will collect this SACS data for your MS candidates and will forward this rubric to the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Administration for your PhD candidates. The Comprehensive Exam Results form will not be sent to the Graduate School until this rubric is completed.
Assessment Rubric for Comprehensive Exam Results Student’s Name: Banner ID: U Degree: MS PhD Area of Concentration, if applicable: Date: Criteria Advanced (3) Intermediate (2) Beginner (1) I Completeness and Breadth Responses reveal a comprehensive level of knowledge of the topic at hand. Responses reveal a satisfactory breadth of knowledge of the topic at hand. Responses are brief and/or reveal a narrow level of knowledge of the topic at hand. II Accuracy and Responses demonstrate depth of knowledge and the ability to analyze and synthesize information. Responses demonstrate depth of knowledge of the topic at hand. Responses are inaccurate and/or superficial. III Logic and Organization Responses are logical and easy to follow. Responses contain all of the elements but take effort to follow. Responses are poorly organized and difficult to follow. Committee Approvals: (Please print) Signatures Criteria I II III Overall Chair (Examining Committee) (Examining Committee) Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Committee Member Criteria Averages Please complete this assessment form for each graduate student in your program upon completion of Comprehensive Exam. Return this completed Assessment Rubric and the Comprehensive Exam Results form to your Graduate Coordinator or designee. Your graduate coordinator will collect this SACS data for your MS candidates and will forward this rubric to the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Administration for your PhD candidates. The Comprehensive Exam Results form will not be sent to the Graduate School until this rubric is completed.