sections and IUD insertion becomes more hilarious Figure (): duration of contraception use in both with previous cesarean sections. groups But for women with low parity there is high rate of IUD insertion because of the trend that Cocps may The study found that it ranges from 1 to In one: affect fertility due to hormonal disturbances (in there 3 years with a mean of 2.06 years. point of view). The study found that it ranges from 1 In group two: to 8 years with a mean of 3.53 years. And it was found that there is no statistical significance. Table (5): Colposcopic examination: Groups Colposcope IUD(N=100) COCPS(N=100) Total N % N % N % Normal 100 100.0 100 100.0 200 100.0 Abnormal 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total 100 100.0 100 100.0 200 100.0 X2 0.000 Chi-square P-value 1.000 (6): pap smear: Groups IUD COCPS Pap smear Total (N=100) (N=100) N % N % N % Normal 82 82.0 90 90.0 172 86.0 Abnormal 18 18.0 10 10.0 28 14.0 Total 100 100.0 100 100.0 200 100.0 X2 1.836 Chi-square P-value 0.175 In group two: Also 100 of women had normal Figure (): All our patients had normal colposcopic colposcopic examination. And it was found that there findings is no statistical significance. In group one: 100% of women had normal Figure (): pap results in both groups colposcopic examination. Table (7): Abnormal Pap smear Groups IUD COCPS Total Abnormal Pap smear (N=100) (N=100) N % N % N % Chronic cervitis 16 16.0 9 9.0 25 12.5 L.S.I.L 2 2.0 1 1.0 3 1.5 Total 18 18.0 10 10.0 28 14.0 X2 0.008 Chi-square P-value 0.927 Figure (): chronic cervicitis vs. LSIL in both groups
sections and IUD insertion becomes more hilarious with previous cesarean sections. But for women with low parity there is high rate of IUD insertion because of the trend that Cocps may affect fertility due to hormonal disturbances (in there point of view). Figure (): duration of contraception use in both groups In one: The study found that it ranges from 1 to 3 years with a mean of 2.06 years. In group two: The study found that it ranges from 1 to 8 years with a mean of 3.53 years. And it was found that there is no statistical significance. Table (5): Colposcopic examination: Colposcope Groups IUD(N=100) COCPS(N=100) Total N % N % N % Normal 100 100.0 100 100.0 200 100.0 Abnormal 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total 100 100.0 100 100.0 200 100.0 Chi-square X2 0.000 P-value 1.000 (6): pap smear: Pap smear Groups IUD (N=100) COCPS (N=100) Total N % N % N % Normal 82 82.0 90 90.0 172 86.0 Abnormal 18 18.0 10 10.0 28 14.0 Total 100 100.0 100 100.0 200 100.0 Chi-square X2 1.836 P-value 0.175 Figure (): All our patients had normal colposcopic findings In group one: 100% of women had normal colposcopic examination. In group two: Also 100 of women had normal colposcopic examination. And it was found that there is no statistical significance. Figure (): pap results in both groups Table (7): Abnormal Pap smear Abnormal Pap smear Groups IUD (N=100) COCPS (N=100) Total N % N % N % Chronic cervitis 16 16.0 9 9.0 25 12.5 L.S.I.L 2 2.0 1 1.0 3 1.5 Total 18 18.0 10 10.0 28 14.0 Chi-square X2 0.008 P-value 0.927 Figure (): chronic cervicitis vs. LSIL in both groups