ASSESSMENT CRITERIA QUANTITATIVE-BASED WORK – Level 4 Classification % Knowledge and Problem Solving Calculations Analysis and Presentation of Work Understanding Interpretation I 80 100 Substantial knowledge and Able to identify more complex problems Clear demonstration of the steps Evidence of analysis and Very well directed – understanding of major theories, and competent in the modelling of taken, few errors in calculations, interpretation of new and presentation, logically [Outstanding principles and concepts standard problems using recognised methods to seen data in conclusions structured Work] formulate solution derived I 70 79 Evidence of knowledge and Competent in the use of appropriate Able to demonstrate the Reasonable evidence of Well directed – clear understanding of a range techniques to identify and model taken, errors in calculations, using analytical and interpretation presentation, logically of theories, principles and standard problems recognised methods to formulate in evaluating outcomes and structured [Excellent Work] concepts solutions deriving conclusions II (i) 60 69 Knowledge and understanding Able to use appropriate techniques to Errors in the steps taken in Some evidence of use of Clearly presented, – of key theories, principles and identify and standard problems calculations, recognised methods analytical and interpretative logically structured [Good Quality concepts evident used incorrectly skills in evaluating Work] outcomes and making judgements II (ii) 50 - 59 Knowledge and understanding Limited ability to use appropriate Steps taken in calculations lack Limited evidence of the use Competent of key theories, principles and techniques to identify and model clarity recognised methods not of analytical and presentation and [Acceptable concepts limited or inconsistent standard problems used or used incorrectly interpretative skills structure Work] III 40 49 Knowledge and understanding Very limited ability to use appropriate Steps taken in calculations are Little evidence of analysis Poor presentation, and – of key theories, principles and techniques to identify and model incomplete, calculations largely and/or incorrect structure [Adequate concepts very limited standard problems incorrect, recognised methods not interpretation Work] used or used incorrectly Fail 35 39 Lack of knowledge and Not able to use appropriate techniques taken in calculations are No analysis and/or Very poor presentation – understanding of key theories, to identify and model standard problems incomplete or/and incorrect, interpretation and inadequate (marginal) principles and concepts recognised methods not used or structure used incorrectly [Limited Work] Fail 0 34 No evidence of knowledge or Does not use appropriate techniques to Steps taken in calculations are No analysis and/or Unacceptable – understanding of key theories, identify and model standard problems incorrect, recognised methods not interpretation presentation and [Unacceptable principles and concepts used or used incorrectly structure Work]
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA – QUANTITATIVE-BASED WORK Level 4 Classification % Knowledge and Understanding Problem Solving Calculations Analysis and Interpretation Presentation of Work I [Outstanding Work] 80 – 100 Substantial knowledge and understanding of major theories, principles and concepts Able to identify more complex problems and competent in the modelling of standard problems Clear demonstration of the steps taken, few errors in calculations, using recognised methods to formulate solution Evidence of analysis and interpretation of new and seen data in conclusions derived Very well directed presentation, logically structured I [Excellent Work] 70 – 79 Evidence of knowledge and clear understanding of a range of theories, principles and concepts Competent in the use of appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Able to demonstrate the taken, errors in calculations, using recognised methods to formulate solutions Reasonable evidence of analytical and interpretation in evaluating outcomes and deriving conclusions Well directed presentation, logically structured II (i) [Good Quality Work] 60 – 69 Knowledge and understanding of key theories, principles and concepts evident Able to use appropriate techniques to identify and standard problems Errors in the steps taken in calculations, recognised methods used incorrectly Some evidence of use of analytical and interpretative skills in evaluating outcomes and making judgements Clearly presented, logically structured II (ii) [Acceptable Work] 50 - 59 Knowledge and understanding of key theories, principles and concepts limited or inconsistent Limited ability to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Steps taken in calculations lack clarity recognised methods not used or used incorrectly Limited evidence of the use of analytical and interpretative skills Competent presentation and structure III [Adequate Work] 40 – 49 Knowledge and understanding of key theories, principles and concepts very limited Very limited ability to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Steps taken in calculations are incomplete, calculations largely incorrect, recognised methods not used or used incorrectly Little evidence of analysis and/or incorrect interpretation Poor presentation, and structure Fail (marginal) [Limited Work] 35 – 39 Lack of knowledge and understanding of key theories, principles and concepts Not able to use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems taken in calculations are incomplete or/and incorrect, recognised methods not used or used incorrectly No analysis and/or interpretation Very poor presentation and inadequate structure Fail [Unacceptable Work] 0 – 34 No evidence of knowledge or understanding of key theories, principles and concepts Does not use appropriate techniques to identify and model standard problems Steps taken in calculations are incorrect, recognised methods not used or used incorrectly No analysis and/or interpretation Unacceptable presentation and structure