used to identify gaps in exists to identify gaps in some content areas and/or wide assessment data and content areas and identify the curricula. curricula. no process exists to identify AMP data sets in all state curricular gaps and/or areas gaps in curricula. tested content areas to of concern. identify curricular gaps and/or areas of concern. A district-wide review District does not review District reviews some of District staff reviews all District staff reviews process is used to the curricula to monitor if it the curricular areas that are curricular areas that are curricula in areas beyond determine if the district- addresses the learning needs subject to AMP testing in subject to AMP testing in AMP testing. approved curricula students. order to monitor if it order to monitor if it address the learning addresses the learning needs addresses the learning needs of all students and make of some student population of all students, and changes changes to the curricula subgroups. to the curricula are made when needed. when needed. ASSESSMENT Indicator Ratings of Performance Domain 2.0- There is evidence that assessment of student Exemplary level of learning is frequent, rigorous, Fully functioning and development and and aligned with Alaska’s Little or no development and Limited development or operational level of implementation Content Standards. implementation partial implementation development and implementation Meets criteria for rating of a plus: “3” Indicators 1 2 3 3+ District-wide District has not aligned District assessments in District assessments in all All district-wide assessments are aligned curricular-area assessments curricular-areas subject to curricular-areas are aligned assessments are aligned Content with Alaska with Alaska Content
used to identify gaps in the curricula. exists to identify gaps in curricula. some content areas and/or no process exists to identify gaps in curricula. wide assessment data and AMP data sets in all state tested content areas to identify curricular gaps and/or areas of concern. content areas and identify curricular gaps and/or areas of concern. A district-wide review process is used to determine if the district- approved curricula address the learning of all students and make changes to the curricula when needed. District does not review the curricula to monitor if it addresses the learning needs students. District reviews some of the curricular areas that are subject to AMP testing in order to monitor if it addresses the learning needs of some student population subgroups. District staff reviews all curricular areas that are subject to AMP testing in order to monitor if it addresses the learning needs of all students, and changes to the curricula are made when needed. District staff reviews curricula in areas beyond AMP testing. Domain 2.0- There is evidence that assessment of student learning is frequent, rigorous, and aligned with Alaska’s Content Standards. ASSESSMENT Indicator Ratings of Performance Little or no development and implementation Limited development or partial implementation Fully functioning and operational level of development and implementation Exemplary level of development and implementation Meets criteria for rating of a “3” plus: Indicators 1 2 3 3+ District-wide assessments are aligned with Alaska Content District has not aligned curricular-area assessments District assessments in curricular-areas subject to District assessments in all curricular-areas are aligned All district-wide assessments are aligned with Alaska Content