Final Maps and 9–10 points: 5–8 points: 0–4 points: Discussion A well-written summary that Missing 2–4 of the Missing 1–2 of the listed (10 points) accurately assesses the characteristics, may be characteristics for an survey design, potential poorly written and unclear; exemplary report and errors, interpretation of may be poorly AND/OR results, and discussion of written/unclear. broader impact of technique. Most characteristics are present (1–2 missing) but are Societal benefit is clearly Societal benefit is listed incorrect, showing a lack of articulated using nontechnical but not clearly justified. comprehension. language. Plots are well designed and AND/OR contain all requested components. It illustrates the All characteristics are change detected and present but lack detail or associated error. Should are incorrect, showing a minimally include station lack of comprehension. locations and error bars.
Final Maps and Discussion (10 points) 9–10 points: A well-written summary that accurately assesses the survey design, potential errors, interpretation of results, and discussion of broader impact of technique. Societal benefit is clearly articulated using nontechnical language. Plots are well designed and contain all requested components. It illustrates the change detected and associated error. Should minimally include station locations and error bars. 5–8 points: Missing 1–2 of the listed characteristics for an exemplary report and may be poorly written/unclear. Societal benefit is listed but not clearly justified. AND/OR All characteristics are present but lack detail or are incorrect, showing a lack of comprehension. 0–4 points: Missing 2–4 of the characteristics, may be poorly written and unclear; AND/OR Most characteristics are present (1–2 missing) but are incorrect, showing a lack of comprehension.