can be exceeded (see 10.22.2.8 TXOP limits)" 15706 James 347.14 Do we need "and Make it consistent Revise TGax editor – June 2 captured in the with 27.9.3.3 to make changes as Wang RXVECTOR in 11-18/1410r4 parameter that are marked with RSSI_LEGACY in the CID 15706, which update the text to explicitly use the primitive" ? Reference returned value of to RSSI_LEGACY RSSI_LEGACY. does not appear in the 27.9.3.3 James 348.20 Does the statement Please clarify. Revise TGax editor 15708 – June means the restriction to make changes as Wang of TXOP limit related shown in 11-18/1410r4 SR_RESTRICTED in that are marked with the above paragraph CID 15708, which shall follow the delete the note, as the conditions of 10.22.2.8 note does not seem to TXOP limits ? Please add any useful make the statement information. easier to read. "The restriction, in addition to the TXOP limit, of the PPDU duration within the TXOP is included in the above paragraph related to SR_RESTRICTED as there are conditions where the TXOP limit can be exceeded (see 10.22.2.8 TXOP limits)". Jarkko 345.31 Please clarify what is Please change the Revise TGax editor 15747 – Kneckt 2 the legacy portion of legacy portion of to make changes as SRP PPDU. SRP PPDU to shown in 11-18/1410r4 correct field name that are marked with of the PPDU or the CID 15747, which preamble. changes the language to use the RXVECTOR parameter RSSI_LEGACY. 15748 Jarkko 345.41 The triggered Shorten or delete Reject the STA is – Kneckt transmission should the x a SlotTime. only allowed to a SIFS from after perform SR if the the trigger frame. Why arriving is indeed, 2X aSlotTime is the expected HE TB needed here? PPDU, and in order to determine this, the receiver must decode
can be exceeded (see 10.22.2.8 TXOP limits)" 15706 James June Wang 347.14 Do we need "and captured in the RXVECTOR parameter RSSI_LEGACY in the primitive" ? Reference to RSSI_LEGACY does not appear in the 27.9.3.3 Make it consistent with 27.9.3.3 Revise – TGax editor to make changes as in 11-18/1410r4 that are marked with CID 15706, which update the text to explicitly use the returned value of RSSI_LEGACY. 15708 James June Wang 348.20 Does the statement means the restriction of TXOP limit related SR_RESTRICTED in the above paragraph shall follow the conditions of 10.22.2.8 TXOP limits ? Please make the statement easier to read. "The restriction, in addition to the TXOP limit, of the PPDU duration within the TXOP is included in the above paragraph related to SR_RESTRICTED as there are conditions where the TXOP limit can be exceeded (see 10.22.2.8 TXOP limits)". Please clarify. Revise – TGax editor to make changes as shown in 11-18/1410r4 that are marked with CID 15708, which delete the note, as the note does not seem to add any useful information. 15747 Jarkko Kneckt 345.31 Please clarify what is the legacy portion of SRP PPDU. Please change the legacy portion of SRP PPDU to correct field name of the PPDU or the preamble. Revise – TGax editor to make changes as shown in 11-18/1410r4 that are marked with CID 15747, which changes the language to use the RXVECTOR parameter RSSI_LEGACY. 15748 Jarkko Kneckt 345.41 The triggered transmission should a SIFS from after the trigger frame. Why 2X aSlotTime is needed here? Shorten or delete the x a SlotTime. Reject – the STA is only allowed to perform SR if the arriving is indeed, the expected HE TB PPDU, and in order to determine this, the receiver must decode 2 2