Tribromoacetic acid (TBAA) 0-30 0.07 0.28 98.65% Table S2. The pseudo first-order rate constants (k’) of the SMZ degradation WDS beaker C(FC) K1 R2 K2 R2 0.0854 0.8752 0.0605 0.9454 0.4 0.1718 0.1649 0.7 0.9776 0.9776 0.2468 0.2143 1.0 0.9884 0.9884 0.3124 0.2648 1.3 0.9673 0.9973 Table S3. Identified bacteria classes in the different pipes[1] Cytophagia Flavobacteria Sphingobacteriia ductile iron pipe 11.95 0.51 1.84 0.76 (%) (%) 14.3 0.79 3.14 1.28 PE pipe ductile iron pipe 27.53 25.15 0.12.04 2.09 (%) Table S4. The proposed intermediates during degradation of SMZ by chlorination. Retention time m/z Chemical structure products (min) 15.227 123 Peak 1 19.109 157 Peak 2 21.191 201 Peak 3 34.263 214 Peak 4 35.001 248 Peak 6 40.151 294 Peak 8 Table S5. Comparison of byproducts of SMZ identified following either in WDS or in beaker.
Tribromoacetic acid (TBAA) 0-30 0.07 0.28 98.65% Table S2. The pseudo first-order rate constants (k’) of the SMZ degradation WDS beaker C(FC) K1 R2 K2 R2 0.4 0.0854 0.8752 0.0605 0.9454 0.7 0.1718 0.9776 0.1649 0.9776 1.0 0.2468 0.9884 0.2143 0.9884 1.3 0.3124 0.9673 0.2648 0.9973 Table S3. Identified bacteria classes in the different pipes[1] Cytophagia Flavobacteria Sphingobacteriia ductile iron pipe (%) 11.95 0.51 1.84 0.76 PE pipe (%) 14.3 0.79 3.14 1.28 ductile iron pipe (%) 27.53 0.12.04 25.15 2.09 Table S4. The proposed intermediates during degradation of SMZ by chlorination. products Retention time (min) m/z Chemical structure Peak 1 15.227 123 Peak 2 19.109 157 Peak 3 21.191 201 Peak 4 34.263 214 Peak 6 35.001 248 Peak 8 40.151 294 Table S5. Comparison of byproducts of SMZ identified following either in WDS or in beaker.