Measurement: 7. Percent of children whose services provided reflect the File Review Percent of children whose service contacts correlate with outcomes on the IFSP including: Checklist frequency and intensity of services indicated on the IFSP. A. service contacts correlate with frequency and intensity Programs use Self-assessment File Review Checklist and check for the of services indicated on the completion of the above item in each child’s record. IFSP; B. service summaries reflect Program: activities related to IFSP Percent = # of children’s records where service contacts correlate outcomes and strategies; and with the frequency and intensity of services indicated on the IFSP C. when services are missed, divided by all children whose records were reviewed by the every effort is made to program. reschedule the visit and/or IFSP is updated to reflect State compiles data across all programs to determine statewide changes in frequency/ performance. intensity of services as appropriate. Statewide: Percent = # of children’s records where service contacts correlate with the frequency and intensity of services indicated on the IFSP divided by all children whose records were reviewed across all agencies. Percent of children whose service summaries reflect activities related to IFSP outcomes and strategies. Programs use Self-assessment File Review Checklist and check for the completion of the above item in each child’s record. Program: Percent = # of children’s records where service summaries reflect activities related to IFSP outcomes and strategies divided by all children whose records were reviewed by the program. State compiles data across all programs to determine statewide performance. Statewide: Percent = # of children’s records where service summaries reflect
7. Percent of children whose services provided reflect the outcomes on the IFSP including: A. service contacts correlate with frequency and intensity of services indicated on the IFSP; B. service summaries reflect activities related to IFSP outcomes and strategies; and C. when services are missed, every effort is made to reschedule the visit and/or IFSP is updated to reflect changes in frequency/ intensity of services as appropriate. File Review Checklist Measurement: Percent of children whose service contacts correlate with frequency and intensity of services indicated on the IFSP. Programs use Self-assessment File Review Checklist and check for the completion of the above item in each child’s record. Program: Percent = # of children’s records where service contacts correlate with the frequency and intensity of services indicated on the IFSP divided by all children whose records were reviewed by the program. State compiles data across all programs to determine statewide performance. Statewide: Percent = # of children’s records where service contacts correlate with the frequency and intensity of services indicated on the IFSP divided by all children whose records were reviewed across all agencies. Percent of children whose service summaries reflect activities related to IFSP outcomes and strategies. Programs use Self-assessment File Review Checklist and check for the completion of the above item in each child’s record. Program: Percent = # of children’s records where service summaries reflect activities related to IFSP outcomes and strategies divided by all children whose records were reviewed by the program. State compiles data across all programs to determine statewide performance. Statewide: Percent = # of children’s records where service summaries reflect