Costs $/ha 393 479 1,384 1,345 569 1,622 Irrigation Service Fee 500 kg USD 110 paid to PWSs 140 kg 120 kg 62 kg USD 80 (ISF) 20% 100% of farmers pay to PWSs, but only 100% (irrigated by lining 0% 0% 88% % of farmer paying ISF half of the total amount to be paid to canals) FWUC by PWS. 30% through PWS (irrigated by earthen canal) Access Road constructed main Canal and secondary Roads Road constructed along Road constructed main Canal Road constructed Road constructed along Road constructed canals main Canal main Canal the dam main Canal No No power (Diesel engine) No power No No Power No power Power Yield increase 2015 – rice t 5,171 6,117 3,682 375 5,215 6,594 Life of project After 7 years, performance After 7 years, performance will reduce to 20 years if we can 20 years but reservoir 20 years if the FWUC of the 20 years as farmers pay the will reduce to 30 % due to 30 % due to silting up of main canal. strengthen the FWUC in storage capacity will be Stung Chinit scheme will be full amount and pumping silting up of main canal. 2017/18 reduced over the years strengthened which is costs relatively low and resulting in decrease of unlikely at present. If not yields are high. area 10 years Effectiveness of FWUC Expected to fail 1 or 2 Expect to function if FWUC is further Well-functioning FWUC. Low yields so farmers will Is not very effective now. Well-functioning FWUC. years as no ISF will be supported especially in working with PWS. Expected to continue as not pay ISF some Future depending on Expected to continue collected anymore. FWUC 100% of farmers pay ISF, years. Not very effective management upstream. to100% of farmers pay ISF. Committee members will but the concern is the area after that. If the FWUC will stay as be reluctant to work for that supplied by earthen strong, but hopefully free canal. It needs technical without the interference of and O&M concentration. the upcoming election.
Costs $/ha 393 479 1,384 1,345 569 1,622 Irrigation Service Fee (ISF) 500 kg USD 110 paid to PWSs 140 kg 120 kg 62 kg USD 80 % of farmer paying ISF 20% 100% of farmers pay to PWSs, but only half of the total amount to be paid to FWUC by PWS. 100% (irrigated by lining canals) 30% through PWS (irrigated by earthen canal) 0% 0% 88% Access Roads Power Road constructed along main Canal No power Road constructed main Canal No Road constructed main Canal No Road constructed along the dam No Power Road constructed main Canal No power Road constructed main Canal and secondary canals No power (Diesel engine) Yield increase 2015 – rice t 5,171 6,117 3,682 375 5,215 6,594 Life of project After 7 years, performance will reduce to 30 % due to silting up of main canal. After 7 years, performance will reduce to 30 % due to silting up of main canal. 20 years if we can strengthen the FWUC in 2017/18 20 years but reservoir storage capacity will be reduced over the years resulting in decrease of area 20 years if the FWUC of the Stung Chinit scheme will be strengthened which is unlikely at present. If not 10 years 20 years as farmers pay the full amount and pumping costs relatively low and yields are high. Effectiveness of FWUC Expected to fail 1 or 2 years as no ISF will be collected anymore. FWUC Committee members will be reluctant to work for free Expect to function if FWUC is further supported especially in working with PWS. Well-functioning FWUC. Expected to continue as 100% of farmers pay ISF, but the concern is the area that supplied by earthen canal. It needs technical and O&M concentration. Low yields so farmers will not pay ISF some years. Not very effective after that. Is not very effective now. Future depending on management upstream. Well-functioning FWUC. Expected to continue to100% of farmers pay ISF. If the FWUC will stay as strong, but hopefully without the interference of the upcoming election.