Rubric for Written Submission on Learning Experience from Team Project Assessment Not Good Enough Good Very Good Score Criteria (0 score <6) (6 score <9) (9 score 10) Does not recognize Recognizes multiple Explains how Criterion 1 Demonstrates perspectives of perspectives and can exposure to new others, and/or explain how they perspectives appreciation of multiple dismisses them as added to the quality evidenced during having no value of the work project served to perspectives and team’s experiences change personalities or improve working environment. Criterion 2 Cannot recall Can identify at 2 Can highlight Explains how new instances in which perspectives and specific experiences other perspectives of explain how each with new perspective helped team and ideas made a positive added to the learning perspectives that impression or experience added to student altered student’s experience contribution consciousness regarding how to deal with others on future projects and work tasks. Criterion 3 Undermines team Can identify at least Explains how student Demonstrates dynamics or only 2 instances of how showed leadership in focuses on how team teamwork improved managing team recognition of value of structure hindered the work product dynamics in a way student efforts and/or explains how that created lessons teamwork student improved that the entire team team dynamics to may benefit from in help the project all future endeavors progress Found no insight Can explain at least 2 Explains new insight Criterion 4 Explains insight from experience or lessons learned about related to teamwork cannot express it an a teamwork that will that is not borrowed related to teamwork gained coherent fashion be of value to student from course readings in future endeavors or instructions. through experience with Shows how this class project insight will help team members in future jobs/endeavors. Total Score
Rubric for Written Submission on Learning Experience from Team Project Assessment Criteria Not Good Enough (0 score <6) Good (6 score <9) Very Good (9 score 10) Score Criterion 1 Demonstrates appreciation of multiple perspectives and experiences Does not recognize perspectives of others, and/or dismisses them as having no value Recognizes multiple perspectives and can explain how they added to the quality of the team’s work Explains how exposure to new perspectives evidenced during project served to change personalities or improve working environment. Criterion 2 Explains how new perspective helped team and added to student experience Cannot recall instances in which other perspectives of ideas made a positive impression or contribution Can identify at 2 perspectives and explain how each added to the learning experience Can highlight specific experiences with new perspectives that altered student’s consciousness regarding how to deal with others on future projects and work tasks. Criterion 3 Demonstrates recognition of value of teamwork Undermines team dynamics or only focuses on how team structure hindered student efforts Can identify at least 2 instances of how teamwork improved the work product and/or explains how student improved team dynamics to help the project progress Explains how student showed leadership in managing team dynamics in a way that created lessons that the entire team may benefit from in all future endeavors Criterion 4 Explains insight related to teamwork gained through experience with class project Found no insight from experience or cannot express it an a coherent fashion Can explain at least 2 lessons learned about teamwork that will be of value to student in future endeavors Explains new insight related to teamwork that is not borrowed from course readings or instructions. Shows how this insight will help team members in future jobs/endeavors. Total Score