that are marked with CID 8125. 7358 70.27 In 70.2-70.4, it says Please clarify Revise generally Kwok – Shum that "The Wake TBTT whether the Wake agree with Au Negotiation subfield is TBTT Negotiation comment - TGax set to in the TWT subfield is allowed editor shall make elements transmitted to set to 1 in the the changes shown by a responding STA TWT elements in 11-17/0777r0 and a scheduling transmitted by a that are marked STA". In 9-262k, scheduling STA. with CID 7358. however, there is a entry titled "Descripton when transmitted by a TWT scheduling STA, Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield = 1", which means that the Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield is allowed to set to 1 in the TWT elements transmitted by a scheduling STA. It is a contradictation. 7359 73.10 Missing proposition for In 73.10 and 73.35, Revise generally Kwok – Shum the sentence replace "Feedback with comment - Au "Feedback can be can be contained is TGax editor shall contained is the QoS the QoS Control make the changes Control field ...". field ..." with shown in "Feedback can be that are contained in the marked with CID QoS Control field 7359. ..." 7360 Kwok 73.14 There is no subclause In 73.14 and 73.39, Revise proposed – Shum 25.14 for link replace "25.14" with change from Au adaptation using the "27.13". commenter is HE variant HT Control misleading, but the field. spirit of the comment is understood and accepted, TGax editor to note that no change is necessary at this point in time as D1.2 already has the problem fixed per CID 4727. 7361 Kwok 74.20 In 74.20-74.25, it says In 69-36, replace "8 Revise other – Shum that the Target Wake or 0" with "8, 2 or changes have Au Up Time field can be 0". caused a separate set to 0, 8 octets or 2 diagram to be octets. In Figure created, so the however, it change is effected indicated that the in spirit, but Target Wake Up Time differently than field can be set to suggested - TGax
that are marked with CID 8125. 7358 Kwok Shum Au 70.27 In 70.2-70.4, it says that "The Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield is set to in the TWT elements transmitted by a responding STA and a scheduling STA". In 9-262k, however, there is a entry titled "Descripton when transmitted by a TWT scheduling STA, Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield = 1", which means that the Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield is allowed to set to 1 in the TWT elements transmitted by a scheduling STA. It is a contradictation. Please clarify whether the Wake TBTT Negotiation subfield is allowed to set to 1 in the TWT elements transmitted by a scheduling STA. Revise – generally agree with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in 11-17/0777r0 that are marked with CID 7358. 7359 Kwok Shum Au 73.10 Missing proposition for the sentence "Feedback can be contained is the QoS Control field ...". In 73.10 and 73.35, replace "Feedback can be contained is the QoS Control field ..." with "Feedback can be contained in the QoS Control field ..." Revise – generally with comment - TGax editor shall make the changes shown in that are marked with CID 7359. 7360 Kwok Shum Au 73.14 There is no subclause 25.14 for link adaptation using the HE variant HT Control field. In 73.14 and 73.39, replace "25.14" with "27.13". Revise – proposed change from commenter is misleading, but the spirit of the comment is understood and accepted, TGax editor to note that no change is necessary at this point in time as D1.2 already has the problem fixed per CID 4727. 7361 Kwok Shum Au 74.20 In 74.20-74.25, it says that the Target Wake Up Time field can be set to 0, 8 octets or 2 octets. In Figure however, it indicated that the Target Wake Up Time field can be set to In 69-36, replace "8 or 0" with "8, 2 or 0". Revise – other changes have caused a separate diagram to be created, so the change is effected in spirit, but differently than suggested - TGax