of date / Action (RAG monitored Mitigating and Amber, for be Monitoring Review if (RAG) controls Risk will of objective Risk realised Effective (Red, Next of Frequency if of Risk Factor Area Description Green) RAG Mitigating Nature Outcome How Date Risk Risk Residual Rate) Responsibility Review Controls Strategic challenge impact Example 1.Staff i. Lack of time given Staff Meetings and INSET Review CPD AO Term Spring – in place & occurring Training to CPD for staff agreed with SLT in advance calendar Summer – one missed due to safeguarding issue. Must replace in June Individual CPD/Staff CPD Plan AO Term Spring – EL missed hers due release time within budget Budget Plan to illness – fixed for 2/5/18 ii. Poor quality CPD External Trainers validated CVs/Prior AO 6/18 Quality trainer booked Knowledge Staff complete evaluations Review ML ½ Spring 1 – 85% VG/G –15% evaluations satisfactory enquired into & wanted more EY input Spring 2 – 95% VG/G – much better EY input – 5% satisfactory feel one teacher CPD linked through gap Review gap AO ½ needs individual input. tasks to ensure impact and tasks & monitoring monitoring of quality
Strategic objective / challenge Risk Area Nature of Risk and date of impact if realised Risk Factor (RAG) Mitigating controls Residual Risk if Mitigating Controls Effective (RAG Rate) How Risk will be monitored Responsibility for Action Review Frequency Outcome of Monitoring Description RAG (Red, Amber, Green) Date of Next Review Example 1.Staff Training i. Lack of time given to CPD for staff Staff Meetings and INSET agreed with SLT in advance Individual CPD/Staff release time within budget Review CPD calendar CPD Plan Budget Plan AO AO Spring – in place & occurring Summer – one missed due to safeguarding issue. Must replace in June Spring – EL missed hers due to illness – fixed for 2/5/18 ii. Poor quality CPD External Trainers validated Staff complete evaluations CPD linked through gap tasks to ensure impact and monitoring CVs/Prior Knowledge Review evaluations Review gap tasks & monitoring of quality AO ML AO 6/18 ½ Term ½ Term Quality trainer booked Spring 1 – 85% VG/G –15% satisfactory enquired into & wanted more EY input Spring 2 – 95% VG/G – much better EY input – 5% satisfactory feel one teacher needs individual input.