Is the performing more poorly or better in some outcomes than others? If so, which one(s)? What are the trends in the state child outcomes? Are the state child outcomes trends stable, trending upwards, or trending downwards? Are the trends similar or different across the outcomes? Do the data appear to be of high quality? Are there any data quality concerns? What outcome(s) would you recommend for further analysis? What additional data or information you like to see? (See Part C or Part B 619 Child Outcomes Data Quality Profile) Expected Patterns for Progress Categories When examining your state data for data quality, ECTA recommends using the following expected ranges for the progress categories when looking for patterns in the data, listed below. Category a Category b Category c Category d Category e 0 <5% <5% <5% <5% >5% >50% >50% >50% >65% Questions: Do you see any unexpected patterns in the progress categories that were not identified in the child outcomes data quality profile? If so, please describe. Given the information in the data quality profile and progress category patterns, what, if any, concerns do you have about the quality of the state data? How might you address those concerns in the future?
Is the performing more poorly or better in some outcomes than others? If so, which one(s)? What are the trends in the state child outcomes? Are the state child outcomes trends stable, trending upwards, or trending downwards? Are the trends similar or different across the outcomes? Do the data appear to be of high quality? Are there any data quality concerns? What outcome(s) would you recommend for further analysis? What additional data or information you like to see? (See Part C or Part B 619 Child Outcomes Data Quality Profile) Expected Patterns for Progress Categories When examining your state data for data quality, ECTA recommends using the following expected ranges for the progress categories when looking for patterns in the data, listed below. Category a Category b Category c Category d Category e 0 <5% <5% <5% <5% >5% >50% >50% >50% >65% Questions: Do you see any unexpected patterns in the progress categories that were not identified in the child outcomes data quality profile? If so, please describe. Given the information in the data quality profile and progress category patterns, what, if any, concerns do you have about the quality of the state data? How might you address those concerns in the future?