Criterion 2.2.3.5 (HDS(RMSP)S.2008:2.2.3.5) A restraint register or equivalent process is established to record sufficient information to provide an auditable record of restraint use. Attainment and Risk: FA Evidence: Finding: Corrective Action: Timeframe (days): (e.g. for 1 week choose 7, for 1 choose 30, for 6 months choose 180, etc.) Standard 2.2.4: Evaluation (HDS(RMSP)S.2008:2.2.4) Services evaluate all episodes of restraint. ARC D5.4n D5.4n, D16.6 Attainment and Risk: FA Evidence: The service has documented evaluation of restraint every month. The restraint process considers the items listed in # 2.4.1. In the three restraint files reviewed, evaluations had been completed with the resident, family/whanau, restraint co-ordinator and medical practitioner. Restraint practices are reviewed on a formal basis every monthly by the facility restraint co-ordinator at quality and staff meetings meeting. Evaluation timeframes are determined by risk levels. The evaluations had been completed with the resident, family/whanau, restraint co-ordinator and medical practitioner. Criterion 2.2.4.1 (HDS(RMSP)S.2008:2.2.4.1) Each episode of restraint is evaluated in collaboration with the consumer and shall consider: (a) Future options to avoid the use of restraint; (b) Whether the consumer's service delivery plan (or crisis plan) was followed; (c) Any review or modification required to the consumer's service delivery plan (or crisis plan); (d) Whether the desired outcome was achieved; (e) Whether the restraint was the least restrictive option to achieve the desired outcome; (f) The duration of the restraint episode and whether this was for the least amount of time required; (g) The impact the restraint had on the consumer; (h) Whether appropriate advocacy/support was provided or facilitated; (i) Whether the observations and monitoring were adequate and maintained the safety of the consumer;
Criterion 2.2.3.5 (HDS(RMSP)S.2008:2.2.3.5) A restraint register or equivalent process is established to record sufficient information to provide an auditable record of restraint use. Attainment and Risk: FA Evidence: Finding: Corrective Action: Timeframe (days): (e.g. for 1 week choose 7, for 1 choose 30, for 6 months choose 180, etc.) Standard 2.2.4: Evaluation (HDS(RMSP)S.2008:2.2.4) Services evaluate all episodes of restraint. ARC D5.4n D5.4n, D16.6 Attainment and Risk: FA Evidence: The service has documented evaluation of restraint every month. The restraint process considers the items listed in # 2.4.1. In the three restraint files reviewed, evaluations had been completed with the resident, family/whanau, restraint co-ordinator and medical practitioner. Restraint practices are reviewed on a formal basis every monthly by the facility restraint co-ordinator at quality and staff meetings meeting. Evaluation timeframes are determined by risk levels. The evaluations had been completed with the resident, family/whanau, restraint co-ordinator and medical practitioner. Criterion 2.2.4.1 (HDS(RMSP)S.2008:2.2.4.1) Each episode of restraint is evaluated in collaboration with the consumer and shall consider: (a) Future options to avoid the use of restraint; (b) Whether the consumer's service delivery plan (or crisis plan) was followed; (c) Any review or modification required to the consumer's service delivery plan (or crisis plan); (d) Whether the desired outcome was achieved; (e) Whether the restraint was the least restrictive option to achieve the desired outcome; (f) The duration of the restraint episode and whether this was for the least amount of time required; (g) The impact the restraint had on the consumer; (h) Whether appropriate advocacy/support was provided or facilitated; (i) Whether the observations and monitoring were adequate and maintained the safety of the consumer;