consumption. Therefore, Richards Energy’s proposal Id. should be rejected as it is inconsistent with the policy stated in the Implementation Order. PPL RB at 11-12 (footnote omitted). (2) Disposition We understand the proposal of Richards to require PPL to provide a lower charge or a credit to shopping customers with respect to the costs of its proposed TOU program. However, it is premature to rule on this issue until we know the actual costs. These costs are default service costs which should be allocated to Default Service customers pursuant to our Default Service Policy Statement at 52 Pa. Code §§ 69.1801 et With this modification we adopt the PPLTOU proposal subject to further seq. consideration as part of the Annual Review process. g. Expiration of Cost Recovery Mechanism (1) Positions of the Parties In its EE&C Plan, PPL states that it is not proposing an expiration date for its cost recovery mechanism. PPL Exh. 1 Amended at 209. In support of this position, PPL explains as follows: the mechanism will be needed to refund any over collection or recover any under existing at the end of the four-year EE&C Plan. Second, as discussed below, the Company may be able to reduce the overall costs of its EE&C Plan by entering into contracts with CSPs that extend beyond May 31, 2013. If that approach is approved by the Commission, the cost recovery mechanism will be needed to
consumption. Id. Therefore, Richards Energy’s proposal should be rejected as it is inconsistent with the policy stated in the Implementation Order. PPL RB at 11-12 (footnote omitted). (2) Disposition We understand the proposal of Richards to require PPL to provide a lower charge or a credit to shopping customers with respect to the costs of its proposed TOU program. However, it is premature to rule on this issue until we know the actual costs. These costs are default service costs which should be allocated to Default Service customers pursuant to our Default Service Policy Statement at 52 Pa. Code §§ 69.1801 et seq. With this modification we adopt the PPLTOU proposal subject to further consideration as part of the Annual Review process. g. Expiration of Cost Recovery Mechanism (1) Positions of the Parties In its EE&C Plan, PPL states that it is not proposing an expiration date for its cost recovery mechanism. PPL Exh. 1 Amended at 209. In support of this position, PPL explains as follows: the mechanism will be needed to refund any over collection or recover any under existing at the end of the four-year EE&C Plan. Second, as discussed below, the Company may be able to reduce the overall costs of its EE&C Plan by entering into contracts with CSPs that extend beyond May 31, 2013. If that approach is approved by the Commission, the cost recovery mechanism will be needed to