VI. Policy Issues There are no policy issues to be highlighted. VII. 2017 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Decision 71/28 of the Executive Committee approved the following indicators to allow for the evaluation of performance of implementing agencies, with the weightings indicated in the table below. UNDP has added a column containing the for those indicators. Some of these targets can be extracted “2018 targets” from 2018 business plan to be approved at the 80th ExCom meeting in November 2017. It should UNDP’s however be noted that this table is usually revised at that meeting, depending on the decisions that are taken. Other targets will be known once the progress report is submitted. prior year’s Category of Item Weight Remarks UNDP’s performance target for indicator 2018 Planning/Approval Number of tranches approved vs. those planned* 10 23 Planning/Approval Number of projects/activities approved vs. those 10 52 14 IS, 16 TAS, 20 PRP, 1 DEM, 1 INV planned (including project preparation activities)** Implementation Funds disbursed (based on estimated 15 31,295,677 As determined by the 2016 Progress disbursement in progress report) Report. Implementation ODS phase-out for the tranche when the next 25 766.9 ODS Phaseout associated with 23 tranche is approved vs. those planned per tranches business plans Implementation Project completion vs. planned in progress 20 4 As determined by the 2016 Progress reports for all activities (excluding project Report. preparation) Administrative The extent to which projects are financially 10 70% of As determined by the 2016 Progress completed 12 months after project completion those due Report. Administrative Timely submission of project completion reports 5 On time TBD vs. those agreed Administrative Timely submission of progress reports and 5 On time TBD business plans and responses unless otherwise agreed * The target of an agency will be reduced if we could not submit a tranche owe to another cooperating/lead agency, if agreed by that agency. ** Project preparation should not be assessed if the Executive Committee has not taken a decision on its funding. Note: As per usual practice, all the above indicators will be revised during the 80th ExCom, depending on which programmes are allowed to stay in the business plan at that meeting. ANNEX 1 TABLES RELATED TO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS – Table 1: Performance Indicator on planned/approved tranches Country Sector and Subsector Bangladesh Stage II HPMP (air conditioning and servicing)
VI. Policy Issues There are no policy issues to be highlighted. VII. 2017 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Decision 71/28 of the Executive Committee approved the following indicators to allow for the evaluation of performance of implementing agencies, with the weightings indicated in the table below. UNDP has added a column containing the “2018 targets” for those indicators. Some of these targets can be extracted from UNDP’s 2018 business plan to be approved at the 80th ExCom meeting in November 2017. It should however be noted that this table is usually revised at that meeting, depending on the decisions that are taken. Other targets will be known once the prior year’s progress report is submitted. Category of performance indicator Item Weight UNDP’s target for 2018 Remarks Planning/Approval Number of tranches approved vs. those planned* 10 23 Planning/Approval Number of projects/activities approved vs. those planned (including project preparation activities)** 10 52 14 IS, 16 TAS, 20 PRP, 1 DEM, 1 INV Implementation Funds disbursed (based on estimated disbursement in progress report) 15 31,295,677 As determined by the 2016 Progress Report. Implementation ODS phase-out for the tranche when the next tranche is approved vs. those planned per business plans 25 766.9 ODS Phaseout associated with 23 tranches Implementation Project completion vs. planned in progress reports for all activities (excluding project preparation) 20 4 As determined by the 2016 Progress Report. Administrative The extent to which projects are financially completed 12 months after project completion 10 70% of those due As determined by the 2016 Progress Report. Administrative Timely submission of project completion reports vs. those agreed 5 On time TBD Administrative Timely submission of progress reports and business plans and responses unless otherwise agreed 5 On time TBD * The target of an agency will be reduced if we could not submit a tranche owe to another cooperating/lead agency, if agreed by that agency. ** Project preparation should not be assessed if the Executive Committee has not taken a decision on its funding. Note: As per usual practice, all the above indicators will be revised during the 80th ExCom, depending on which programmes are allowed to stay in the business plan at that meeting. ANNEX 1 – TABLES RELATED TO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Table 1: Performance Indicator on planned/approved tranches Country Sector and Subsector Bangladesh Stage II HPMP (air conditioning and servicing)