- [This tool should be used to document and track data issues meeting a certain level of criticality as defined by the Data Governance Board or data governance oversight body.] Criteria Example: Must meet one or more of the following criteria: Creates a burden to the agency or its constituents. Causes errors or delays in reporting or funding. Prevents the use of the data for its intended purpose. Priority [Prioritize the External issue based Data Advisory on impact to Governance Executive Committee the agency or Stewards Board Leadership Date/Outcome Data its Workgroup Date/Outcome Date/Outcome [The dates and Owner(s) constituents. Date/Outcome [The dates and [The dates and outcomes of all [The person List the [The dates and outcomes of all outcomes of all External Data Issue Issue Description or group priority level outcomes of all Data Executive Advisory Final Outcome / Date of implementation [A short [A brief, but more responsible and why it Action Taken? stewards Governance Leadership Committee [Describe how the data was resolved description or in-depth for the received that [A log of all actions workgroups Board meetings meetings meetings or dealt with and the date on which a name of the description of the affected level of taken relating to this relating to this relating to this relating to this relating to this solution was implemented or a final data issue.] data issue.] data.] priority.] data issue.] issue.] issue.] issue.] issue.] decision was made.] Example: Stewards workgroup met and recommended adding a new Basis of Admission code Example: Inability Term “Long to enter grades and Example: Suspension Services.” properly calculate High DGB and EAC – graduation rates Impacts reviewed and for schools when districts and approved SW Example: Example: 4/20/16 new basis of –A they have a student agency, causes recommendation. EL Example: Example: 4/4/16 Example: admission code was approved and “LTSS” Example: that is suspended Example: errors in approved 1/25/16 2/17/16 Approved SW 3/12/15 Agreed will be added to the Wave via an Comprehensive through the end of Michael accountability recommendation for Solution Approved SW and DGB with the SW enhancement. Added to enhancement list for Exit the year. Tamborski calculations. implementation. recommended recommendation recommendation recommendation implementation by the 2016-17 school year.
- [This tool should be used to document and track data issues meeting a certain level of criticality as defined by the Data Governance Board or data governance oversight body.] Criteria Example: Must meet one or more of the following criteria: Creates a burden to the agency or its constituents. Causes errors or delays in reporting or funding. Prevents the use of the data for its intended purpose. Data Issue [A short description or name of the data issue.] Issue Description [A brief, but more in-depth description of the data issue.] Data Owner(s) [The person or group responsible for the affected data.] Priority [Prioritize the issue based on impact to the agency or its constituents. List the priority level and why it received that level of priority.] Action Taken? [A log of all actions taken relating to this data issue.] Stewards Workgroup Date/Outcome [The dates and outcomes of all stewards workgroups relating to this issue.] Data Governance Board Date/Outcome [The dates and outcomes of all Data Governance Board meetings relating to this issue.] Executive Leadership Date/Outcome [The dates and outcomes of all Executive Leadership meetings relating to this issue.] External Advisory Committee Date/Outcome [The dates and outcomes of all External Advisory Committee meetings relating to this issue.] Final Outcome / Date of implementation [Describe how the data was resolved or dealt with and the date on which a solution was implemented or a final decision was made.] Example: Comprehensive Exit Example: Inability to enter grades and properly calculate graduation rates for schools when they have a student that is suspended through the end of the year. Example: Michael Tamborski Example: High – Impacts districts and agency, causes errors in accountability calculations. Example: Stewards workgroup met and recommended adding a new Basis of Admission code “Long Term Suspension Services.” DGB and EAC reviewed and approved SW recommendation. EL approved recommendation for implementation. Example: 1/25/16 Solution recommended Example: 2/17/16 Approved SW recommendation Example: 4/4/16 Approved SW and DGB recommendation Example: 3/12/15 Agreed with the SW recommendation Example: 4/20/16 –A new basis of admission code “LTSS” was approved and will be added to the Wave via an enhancement. Added to enhancement list for implementation by the 2016-17 school year.