followed by relevant sources and supporting commentary. A clear representation of this strategy is presented when she introduces the negative effects of overbearing parents: technology “While has enabled children’s dependency, it has also abetted parental oversight, making it easier for overbearing parents to well into adulthood. children are not allowed to make small “hover” ‘If errors, they don’t learn through experience’, argues Grafman” (Tyler 470). She then smartly follows this argument with a transition to the effects of these parents in the “Helicopter” workforce. Likewise to the previous structure, she begins: millennials move into the “As workforce, their hovering parents do, too. are writing resumes, applying to jobs and ‘Parents even attending interviews’ reports Steven Rothberg” (471). This repeated pattern allows the reader’s message to appear transparent and well-built as each of Tyler’s points contains solid structure. This clear structure is evident in the labeled subtitles; Tyler begins with her introduction and thesis, then identifies youths’ apparent lack of human skills in “Millennial Connectivity” followed by Parents”, and eventually connects ideas with “Helicopter in the Workforce”. The conclusion works well with the text and provides a “Helicoptering logical, resolute policy of Expectations” acknowledging the issue of the ensuing problem, “Great but also realizing the great potential and polar argument toward the ultimate advancement of the workforce in future workforce scenarios. Tyler employs various strategies to address and appeal to her audience. To analyze the rhetorical effectiveness of the article on a desired audience, the audience must be identified. This is evidently defined in the introduction of the article; the article’s purpose is to inform mature human resource employers and experts on an impending issue while simultaneously offering a solution. Tyler does an exceptional job of targeting and appealing to this older generation. She repeatedly emphasizes the older generation’s to the technology-tethered generation “superiority”
followed by relevant sources and supporting commentary. A clear representation of this strategy is presented when she introduces the negative effects of overbearing parents: “While technology has enabled children’s dependency, it has also abetted parental oversight, making it easier for overbearing parents to “hover” well into adulthood. ‘If children are not allowed to make small errors, they don’t learn through experience’, argues Grafman” (Tyler 470). She then smartly follows this argument with a transition to the effects of these “Helicopter” parents in the workforce. Likewise to the previous structure, she begins: “As millennials move into the workforce, their hovering parents do, too. ‘Parents are writing resumes, applying to jobs and even attending interviews’ reports Steven Rothberg” (471). This repeated pattern allows the reader’s message to appear transparent and well-built as each of Tyler’s points contains solid structure. This clear structure is evident in the labeled subtitles; Tyler begins with her introduction and thesis, then identifies youths’ apparent lack of human skills in “Millennial Connectivity” followed by “Helicopter Parents”, and eventually connects ideas with “Helicoptering in the Workforce”. The conclusion works well with the text and provides a logical, resolute policy of “Great Expectations” acknowledging the issue of the ensuing problem, but also realizing the great potential and polar argument toward the ultimate advancement of the workforce in future workforce scenarios. Tyler employs various strategies to address and appeal to her audience. To analyze the rhetorical effectiveness of the article on a desired audience, the audience must be identified. This is evidently defined in the introduction of the article; the article’s purpose is to inform mature human resource employers and experts on an impending issue while simultaneously offering a solution. Tyler does an exceptional job of targeting and appealing to this older generation. She repeatedly emphasizes the older generation’s “superiority” to the technology-tethered generation