service from an electrical corporation.” Since the most recent determination of CforAT’s customer status is more than a year old, CforAT has recently submitted a request for a finding to refresh the determination. Please see CforAT’s request for intervenor compensation, filed on January 20, 2017 in A. et al, the CARE/ESA Proceeding. 9-11 Showing of “significant financial hardship”: CforAT has routinely been found eligible for intervenor compensation based on a showing of significant financial hardship. At this time, the most recent determination that we have made a sufficient showing is over one year old, and is thus outside of the window for the rebuttable presumption of hardship to apply. CforAT has recently submitted a request for a renewed finding of significant financial hardship in our request for intervenor compensation, filed on January 20, 2017 in A. 14-11-007 et al, the CARE/ESA Proceeding. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Claimed Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Contribution(s) Claimed Contribution(s) 1. Overview: This proceeding As set out below, Verified CforAT’s adopts a framework, including participation focused on the guiding principles, for consideration of the needs of residential designing time periods for time customers, particularly vulnerable of use (TOU) rates for electric customers, to understand and respond to customers, including TOU rates and rate periods. residential customers. The actual guidelines adopted are set out as an appendix to the final decision, and are intended to be given consideration in the separate proceedings in which actual TOU rate designs will be
service from an electrical corporation.” Since the most recent determination of CforAT’s customer status is more than a year old, CforAT has recently submitted a request for a finding to refresh the determination. Please see CforAT’s request for intervenor compensation, filed on January 20, 2017 in A. et al, the CARE/ESA Proceeding. 9-11 Showing of “significant financial hardship”: CforAT has routinely been found eligible for intervenor compensation based on a showing of significant financial hardship. At this time, the most recent determination that we have made a sufficient showing is over one year old, and is thus outside of the window for the rebuttable presumption of hardship to apply. CforAT has recently submitted a request for a renewed finding of significant financial hardship in our request for intervenor compensation, filed on January 20, 2017 in A. 14-11-007 et al, the CARE/ESA Proceeding. PART II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion 1. Overview: This proceeding adopts a framework, including guiding principles, for designing time periods for time of use (TOU) rates for electric customers, including residential customers. The actual guidelines adopted are set out as an appendix to the final decision, and are intended to be given consideration in the separate proceedings in which actual TOU rate designs will be As set out below, CforAT’s participation focused on the consideration of the needs of residential customers, particularly vulnerable customers, to understand and respond to TOU rates and rate periods. Verified