A in the decision on which STP A delayed decision of messaging format for STP may lead to Likely - Continuing to escalate severity of risk and impact with Likely - Message Format will be used may delayed take-up by software developers and reduced STP take-up. Very decision-makers. Very High delay project deliverables This delay will also place pressure on ATO EST to be able to High develop the relevant STP Product Specific MIG, being the core artefact needed to assist developers in the build. If a choice is made to use simple A decision to use Simple XBRL may impact delivery of the STP Unlikely Monitor and support EST testing effort. Unlikely - XBRL file format there may be risk to project, as there are aspects that have not been proven. This - High High project delivery due to it being an includes whether streaming and validation can occur using a unproven solution standard XML parser as well as processing and throughput impacts. Failure to develop a seamless A failure to develop a seamless transition strategy may lead to a Even Significant focus on consultation activity with all Even Chance - transition strategy may lead to poor poor user experience, delayed take up and reduced or delayed impacted segments to understand difficulties in Chance - Very High user experience, delayed take-up benefits. transition. Very High and reduced benefits Education program to be designed and implemented to support transition. Working with software developers to co-design a product that meets employer needs for reporting in real time at the payroll event. The Enterprise Data Hub (EDH) may Smarter Data and Data and Analytics stakeholders have expressed Even Pursuing multiple funding options to ensure funding is Even not be delivered in time for the some concern over the forecasted timing of decisions that will Chance available based on broader corporate requirement for Chance - preventing STP data capture facilitate the funding of the EDH. The timing places pressure on the - Very infrastructure. Very High capability and delaying Pilot go-live EDH delivery schedule. High Check points on development activity to be scheduled to Current delivery timeframes are within project timeframes, especially ensure readiness for pilot. given the pilot will not commence until early 2017, however a delay in any of the above would likely also result in a delay of the Pilot.
A in the decision on which STP Message Format will be used may delay project deliverables A delayed decision of messaging format for STP may lead to delayed take-up by software developers and reduced STP take-up. This delay will also place pressure on ATO EST to be able to develop the relevant STP Product Specific MIG, being the core artefact needed to assist developers in the build. Likely - Very High Continuing to escalate severity of risk and impact with decision-makers. Likely - Very High If a choice is made to use simple XBRL file format there may be risk to project delivery due to it being an unproven solution A decision to use Simple XBRL may impact delivery of the STP project, as there are aspects that have not been proven. This includes whether streaming and validation can occur using a standard XML parser as well as processing and throughput impacts. Unlikely - High Monitor and support EST testing effort. Unlikely - High Failure to develop a seamless transition strategy may lead to poor user experience, delayed take-up and reduced benefits A failure to develop a seamless transition strategy may lead to a poor user experience, delayed take up and reduced or delayed benefits. Even Chance - Very High Significant focus on consultation activity with all impacted segments to understand difficulties in transition. Education program to be designed and implemented to support transition. Working with software developers to co-design a product that meets employer needs for reporting in real time at the payroll event. Even Chance - Very High The Enterprise Data Hub (EDH) may not be delivered in time for the preventing STP data capture capability and delaying Pilot go-live Smarter Data and Data and Analytics stakeholders have expressed some concern over the forecasted timing of decisions that will facilitate the funding of the EDH. The timing places pressure on the EDH delivery schedule. Current delivery timeframes are within project timeframes, especially given the pilot will not commence until early 2017, however a delay in any of the above would likely also result in a delay of the Pilot. Even Chance - Very High Pursuing multiple funding options to ensure funding is available based on broader corporate requirement for infrastructure. Check points on development activity to be scheduled to ensure readiness for pilot. Even Chance - Very High