FEAS 3.02-FY2 X X X – FEAS 3.02-FY3 X X X – FEAS 3.02-FY4 X X X – FEAS 3.04-FY1 X – FEAS 3.04-FY2 X X – FEAS 3.04-FY3 X – FEAS 3.04-FY4 X – FEAS 3.04-FY5 X – FEAS 3.04-FY6 X – FEAS 3.04-FY7 X – FEAS 3.06-FY1 X – FEAS 3.06-FY2 X X – FEAS 3.06-FY3 X X – FEAS 3.06-FY7 X X – FEAS 3.07-FY3 X X X – FEAS 3.08-FY2 X – FEAS 3.09-FY4 X – FEAS 3.10-FY3 X X – FEAS 3.11-FY1 X – FEAS 3.11-FY2 X – FEAS 3.11-FY3 X X – FEAS 3.12-FY1 X – FEAS 3.12-FY2 X – FEAS 3.12-FY4 X – FEAS 3.12-FY5 X – FEAS 3.12-FY6 X – Some indicators were added specifically to APSC-100, beyond the faculty-wide indicators created and shown in Appendix 3.1A. Most indicators were scored on a four-level rubric, with a corresponding to “1” expectation not being demonstrated, a meaning marginal (threshold) performance, for meeting “2” “3” expectations (target performance), and 4 for exceeding expectations. The rubrics were given to students when the assignments were created. Each deliverable, by students or team, was graded using the rubric. The total grade for the deliverable was used to compute the mark on the assignment, and the score for each indicator was stored for the purpose of analyzing students’ ability to meet expectations. In the next section student performance is described. Sample rubrics for some of the deliverables are shown below. More detail is shown in the set of course materials. Rubric descriptors for each indicator on each deliverable are shown in the section with student scores.
FEAS – 3.02-FY2 X X X FEAS – 3.02-FY3 X X X FEAS – 3.02-FY4 X X X FEAS – 3.04-FY1 X FEAS – 3.04-FY2 X X FEAS – 3.04-FY3 X FEAS – 3.04-FY4 X FEAS – 3.04-FY5 X FEAS – 3.04-FY6 X FEAS – 3.04-FY7 X FEAS – 3.06-FY1 X FEAS – 3.06-FY2 X X FEAS – 3.06-FY3 X X FEAS – 3.06-FY7 X X FEAS – 3.07-FY3 X X X FEAS – 3.08-FY2 X FEAS – 3.09-FY4 X FEAS – 3.10-FY3 X X FEAS – 3.11-FY1 X FEAS – 3.11-FY2 X FEAS – 3.11-FY3 X X FEAS – 3.12-FY1 X FEAS – 3.12-FY2 X FEAS – 3.12-FY4 X FEAS – 3.12-FY5 X FEAS – 3.12-FY6 X Some indicators were added specifically to APSC-100, beyond the faculty-wide indicators created and shown in Appendix 3.1A. Most indicators were scored on a four-level rubric, with a “1” corresponding to expectation not being demonstrated, a “2” meaning marginal (threshold) performance, “3” for meeting expectations (target performance), and 4 for exceeding expectations. The rubrics were given to students when the assignments were created. Each deliverable, by students or team, was graded using the rubric. The total grade for the deliverable was used to compute the mark on the assignment, and the score for each indicator was stored for the purpose of analyzing students’ ability to meet expectations. In the next section student performance is described. Sample rubrics for some of the deliverables are shown below. More detail is shown in the set of course materials. Rubric descriptors for each indicator on each deliverable are shown in the section with student scores.