actions were arbitrary NRDC v. Winter, 518 F.3d 2008 CEQ’s and restores injunction. 658 (9th Cir. 2008) Navy petitions the U.S. NRDC v. Winter, 527 F. Supreme Court to review the Supp. 2d 1216 (C.D. Cal. Ninth Circuit decision. February 2008) NRDC v. Winter, No. 29, 2008 Ninth Circuit modifies two (March 31, 2008) mitigation measures, February allowing 19, 2008 November Ninth Circuit rejects sonar reduction when at 12, 2008 Navy’s motion for a stay. critical point of the exercise U.S. Supreme Court finds in NRDC v. Winter, 516 F.3d and during surface ducting favor of the Navy. 1103 (9th Cir. 2008) conditions. Winter v. NRDC,129 S. Ct. NRDC v. Winter, 2008 U.S. 365 (2008) February App. LEXIS 4458 (9th Cir. 29, 2008 Feb. 29, 2008) Ninth Circuit affirms preliminary injunction. March 31, Appendix C (mitigation measures, pasted from Alexander 2008, Table 3, see attached pages CRS 16-17, from Alexander 2008) Works Cited Adler, Jonathan. Habeas Porpoise Dorf, Michael. The – “Habeas Porpoise: Marine Mammals vs. Navy Future of NEPA in a Sonar”. Writing Bottle.” Blog posting, for the Blog, The Volokh Conspiracy. from Dorf on Law. Available at , 2009. Available at . Last visited April 19, 2009. Farnsworth, E. Allen. An Introduction to Alexander, Kristina. and Sonar: the Legal System of the United States, 3rd “Whales Environmental Exemptions for the Oceana Publications: New York, 1996. Navy’s Ed. Mid-Frequency Active Sonar Training” the Blue and Gold “Green Trumps – Congressional Research Service Report. National Security Takes a Back Seat to Order Code RL344403. Updated November Natural on the American Resources.” Posted 14, 2008. College of Environmental Lawyers court backs Navy in sonar (ACOEL) website, January 22, 2008. “Divided case” (Nov. 12, 2008) Available at . Last visited April 20, 2009. On the Docket: U.S. Available at , 2009 Supreme Court News.
CEQ’s actions were arbitrary and restores injunction. NRDC v. Winter, 527 F. Supp. 2d 1216 (C.D. Cal. 2008) February 19, 2008 Ninth Circuit rejects Navy’s motion for a stay. NRDC v. Winter, 516 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2008) February 29, 2008 Ninth Circuit affirms preliminary injunction. NRDC v. Winter, 518 F.3d 658 (9th Cir. 2008) February 29, 2008 Ninth Circuit modifies two mitigation measures, allowing sonar reduction when at critical point of the exercise and during surface ducting conditions. NRDC v. Winter, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 4458 (9th Cir. Feb. 29, 2008) March 31, 2008 Navy petitions the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit decision. NRDC v. Winter, No. (March 31, 2008) November 12, 2008 U.S. Supreme Court finds in favor of the Navy. Winter v. NRDC,129 S. Ct. 365 (2008) Appendix C (mitigation measures, pasted from Alexander 2008, Table 3, see attached pages CRS 16-17, from Alexander 2008) Works Cited Adler, Jonathan. Habeas Porpoise – Marine Mammals vs. Navy Sonar”. Writing for the Blog, The Volokh Conspiracy. Available at . Last visited April 19, 2009. Alexander, Kristina. “Whales and Sonar: Environmental Exemptions for the Navy’s Mid-Frequency Active Sonar Training” Congressional Research Service Report. Order Code RL344403. Updated November 14, 2008. “Divided court backs Navy in sonar case” (Nov. 12, 2008) On the Docket: U.S. Supreme Court News. Available at , 2009 Dorf, Michael. “Habeas Porpoise: The Future of NEPA in a Bottle.” Blog posting, from Dorf on Law. Available at , 2009. Farnsworth, E. Allen. An Introduction to the Legal System of the United States, 3rd Ed. Oceana Publications: New York, 1996. “Green Trumps the Blue and Gold – National Security Takes a Back Seat to Natural Resources.” Posted on the American College of Environmental Lawyers (ACOEL) website, January 22, 2008. Available at . Last visited April 20, 2009.