the time required for PDE review. Until PDE approves an locally-developed LEA’s multiple measures and alternative educator rating tool, the LEA is required to use PDE 82-1, PDE 82-2, and/or PDE 82-3. Locally-developed alternative evaluation tools are being submitted for the following professional and temporary professional employees: Insert a Check to Indicate (√) Professional and Temporary Professional Employees Alternative is Submitted 1a Classroom Teachers 1b Principals/School Leaders 1c Nonteaching Professional Employees Identification of changes being proposed Insert a Check to Indicate (√) Proposed Changes Revision is Submitted for Action 2a Building Level Data/Student Performance/School Performance Profile (SPP) (see item #6) 2b Teacher Specific Data (see item #7) 2c Correlation Data/Relationship (see item #8) 2d Elective Data/Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) (see item #9) 2e Combining Multiple Student Measures (see item #10) 2f LEA Implementation of Alternative Rating Tool (see item #11) 2g Accuracy Certification Statement (see Item #12) Describe the purpose, vision and goals of the locally-developed LEA’s educator evaluation system, and how the alternative multiple measures fit into the purpose, vision and goals
the time required for PDE review. Until PDE approves an LEA’s locally-developed multiple measures and alternative educator rating tool, the LEA is required to use PDE 82-1, PDE 82-2, and/or PDE 82-3. Locally-developed alternative evaluation tools are being submitted for the following professional and temporary professional employees: Professional and Temporary Professional Employees Insert a Check (√) to Indicate Alternative is Submitted 1a Classroom Teachers 1b Principals/School Leaders 1c Nonteaching Professional Employees Identification of changes being proposed Proposed Changes Insert a Check (√) to Indicate Revision is Submitted for Action 2a Building Level Data/Student Performance/School Performance Profile (SPP) (see item #6) 2b Teacher Specific Data (see item #7) 2c Correlation Data/Relationship (see item #8) 2d Elective Data/Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) (see item #9) 2e Combining Multiple Student Measures (see item #10) 2f LEA Implementation of Alternative Rating Tool (see item #11) 2g Accuracy Certification Statement (see Item #12) Describe the purpose, vision and goals of the LEA’s locally-developed educator evaluation system, and how the alternative multiple measures fit into the purpose, vision and goals