2. Historical Contract Non-Performance 2.1 History of Non- Non-performance of a contract did not occur as a Must meet Must meet Must meet N/A Form CON-2 result of contractor’s default since 1st January requirement1 requirements requirement Contracts [insert year]. 2.2 Not under suspension based on execution of a Must meet Must meet Must meet N/A Application Suspension Based on Execution of Bid/Proposal Securing Declaration pursuant to requirement requirement requirement Submission Bid/Proposal ITA 4.9. Letter Declaration by the Employer 2.3 Pending Litigation Applicant’s financial position and prospective Must meet N/A Must meet N/A Form CON 2 – long term profitability still sound according to requirement requirement criteria established in 3.1 below and assuming that all pending litigation will be resolved against the Applicant 2.4 Litigation History No consistent history of award Must meet Must meet Must meet N/A Form CON 2 – decisions against the Applicant since 1st January requirement requirement requirement [insert year] 3. Financial Situation and Performan 3.1 Financial (i) The Applicant shall demonstrate that it has Must meet Must meet N/A N/A Form FIN 3.1, – Capabilities access to, or has available, liquid assets, requirement requirement with attachments unencumbered real assets, lines of credit, and other financial means (independent of any contractual advance payment) sufficient to meet the construction cash flow requirements estimated as USD $ for the subject [insert amount in US$] contract(s) net of the Applicants other commitments (ii) The Applicant shall also demonstrate, to the Must meet Must meet N/A N/A satisfaction of the Employer, that it has adequate requirement requirement sources of finance to meet the cash flow requirements on works currently in progress and for future contract commitments.
2. Historical Contract Non-Performance 2.1 History of Contracts Non-performance of a contract did not occur as a result of contractor’s default since 1st January [insert year]. Must meet requirement1 Must meet requirements Must meet requirement N/A Form CON-2 2.2 Suspension Based on Execution of Bid/Proposal Declaration by the Employer Not under suspension based on execution of a Bid/Proposal Securing Declaration pursuant to ITA 4.9. Must meet requirement Must meet requirement Must meet requirement N/A Application Submission Letter 2.3 Pending Litigation Applicant’s financial position and prospective long term profitability still sound according to criteria established in 3.1 below and assuming that all pending litigation will be resolved against the Applicant Must meet requirement N/A Must meet requirement N/A Form CON – 2 2.4 Litigation History No consistent history of award decisions against the Applicant since 1st January [insert year] Must meet requirement Must meet requirement Must meet requirement N/A Form CON – 2 3. Financial Situation and Performan 3.1 Financial Capabilities (i) The Applicant shall demonstrate that it has access to, or has available, liquid assets, unencumbered real assets, lines of credit, and other financial means (independent of any contractual advance payment) sufficient to meet the construction cash flow requirements estimated as USD $ [insert amount in US$] for the subject contract(s) net of the Applicants other commitments (ii) The Applicant shall also demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Employer, that it has adequate sources of finance to meet the cash flow requirements on works currently in progress and for future contract commitments. Must meet requirement Must meet requirement Must meet requirement Must meet requirement N/A N/A N/A N/A Form FIN – 3.1, with attachments Non-