Not Good Good Excellent Assessment Criteria: The author Enough Score 6 score <9 9 score 10 0 score <6 Purpose, Problem, Argument Structure (score x 2) identified and defined a specific business problem. • selected credible and relevant sources. • evaluated the methodology of the sources. • ___/20 compared/contrasted the • sources’ strengths/weaknesses took a position on what research and sources would best • apply to the problem facing the target organization. supported this position with reasons and evidence • Research, Documentation, & Assignment (score x 4) met scope requirement (minimum 1000 words). • followed APA guidelines for citations and references. • identified five or more sources in the reference list. • ___/40 cited each reference at least once. • used summaries and quotes appropriately. • gave at least one citation for each reference. • Organization (score x 2) provided an effective introduction identifying the • structure, and research problem. paper’s purpose, composed unified, coherent, & developed paragraphs. • ___/20 used transition markers to link paragraphs and sections. • wrote an effective conclusion synthesizing key findings • and applying these to the target organization. Mechanics, Format, and Document Design (score x 2) used sophisticated and relevant language and syntax. • composed clear, concise, and varied sentences. • ___/20 wrote with a minimum of grammar and diction errors. • followed APA format guidelines. • presented graphs and tables clearly and attractively. • __/100 Maximum Points: 100 Total Score Comments: Assignment 4: White Paper Assurance of Learning Rubric Not Good Good Excellent Assessment Criteria: The author Enough Score 6 score <9 9 score 10 0 score <6
Assessment Criteria: The author Not Good Enough 0 score <6 Good 6 score <9 Excellent 9 score 10 Score Purpose, Problem, Argument Structure (score x 2) • identified and defined a specific business problem. • selected credible and relevant sources. • evaluated the methodology of the sources. • compared/contrasted the sources’ strengths/weaknesses • took a position on what research and sources would best apply to the problem facing the target organization. • supported this position with reasons and evidence ___/20 Research, Documentation, & Assignment (score x 4) • met scope requirement (minimum 1000 words). • followed APA guidelines for citations and references. • identified five or more sources in the reference list. • cited each reference at least once. • used summaries and quotes appropriately. • gave at least one citation for each reference. ___/40 Organization (score x 2) • provided an effective introduction identifying the paper’s purpose, structure, and research problem. • composed unified, coherent, & developed paragraphs. • used transition markers to link paragraphs and sections. • wrote an effective conclusion synthesizing key findings and applying these to the target organization. ___/20 Mechanics, Format, and Document Design (score x 2) • used sophisticated and relevant language and syntax. • composed clear, concise, and varied sentences. • wrote with a minimum of grammar and diction errors. • followed APA format guidelines. • presented graphs and tables clearly and attractively. ___/20 Maximum Points: 100 Total Score __/100 Comments: Assignment 4: White Paper Assurance of Learning Rubric Assessment Criteria: The author Not Good Enough 0 score <6 Good 6 score <9 Excellent 9 score 10 Score