Previous Academic Year 2015-6 PPG allocation: £65,348 fully allocated and spent See 2015 2016 Pupil Premium Summary Report – attached Quality of teaching for all Desired Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the Lessons learned outcome action/approach success criteria? Include impact on (and whether you will continue with this approach) pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Narrow gaps Thorough Yes: All PP chn made progress. DIS chn Yes: continue provision and sharp focus by staff team on between PP vs attainment and attained as well and often better than disadvantaged children non PP progress tracking ALL chn when compared with chn who Next steps: sharper focus on performance of Yr 2 phonic screening retakes Ensuring that the had similar starting points quality of teaching was at least Good CPD for staff Targeted support Desired Chosen Estimated impact: Did you meet the Lessons learned outcome action/approach success criteria? Include impact on (and whether you will continue with this approach) pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Cost Narrow gaps Evidence based Yes: targeted intervention with clear Yes: continues to be a worthy way of deploying staff and money; between PP vs interventions; expected outcomes, tracking and supports wellbeing, too non PP daily reading for focused teaching made a significant PP and impact in supporting chn with basic skills Disadvantaged and allowing them to access the next learners steps of learning Other approaches
Previous Academic Year 2015-6 PPG allocation: £65,348 fully allocated and spent See 2015 – 2016 Pupil Premium Summary Report attached Quality of teaching for all Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Narrow gaps between PP vs non PP Thorough attainment and progress tracking Ensuring that the quality of teaching was at least Good CPD for staff Yes: All PP chn made progress. DIS chn attained as well and often better than ALL chn when compared with chn who had similar starting points Yes: continue provision and sharp focus by staff team on disadvantaged children Next steps: sharper focus on performance of Yr 2 phonic screening retakes Targeted support Desired outcome Chosen action/approach Estimated impact: Did you meet the success criteria? Include impact on pupils not eligible for PP, if appropriate. Lessons learned (and whether you will continue with this approach) Cost Narrow gaps between PP vs non PP Evidence based interventions; daily reading for PP and Disadvantaged learners Yes: targeted intervention with clear expected outcomes, tracking and focused teaching made a significant impact in supporting chn with basic skills and allowing them to access the next steps of learning Yes: continues to be a worthy way of deploying staff and money; supports wellbeing, too Other approaches