When establishing if there are reasons for suspicion of money laundering or terrorism financing, the lawyer is required to apply the list of indicators as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and also to consider other circumstances that indicate the reasons for suspicion of money laundering or terrorism financing. When developing the list of indicators from paragraph 1 of this Article, the lawyer shall also include in the list the indicators published on the APML’s website. Record keeping Article 62 The lawyer shall keep records of the following data: 1) details of customers, business relationships and transactions referred to in Article 8 of this Law; 2) data sent to the APML pursuant to Article 58 of this Law. IV ACTIONS AND MEASURES TAKEN BY NOTARIES PUBLIC Establishing the identity of a customer Article 63 A notary public shall identify a customer in line with the regulations which govern the activity of notaries public. Reporting to the APML on persons and transactions with respect to which there are reasons for suspicion of money laundering or terrorism financing Article 64 In a notary public, when drafting a notarial deed and verifying a private identification document (notarisation), established that in relation to a customer or transaction there are reasons to suspect money laundering or terrorism financing, he shall inform the APML thereof without delay. If the notary public, either due to the nature of transaction or other justified reason, cannot act as laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article, it shall inform the APML thereof as soon as possible. The notary public shall make a written statement explaining the reasons why he did not act as prescribed. The notary public shall file the reports to the APML electronically. In a case of urgency, such report may be delivered also by telephone, in which case it shall consequently be sent to the APML electronically no later than the next business day. Obligation to provide data Article 65
When establishing if there are reasons for suspicion of money laundering or terrorism financing, the lawyer is required to apply the list of indicators as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and also to consider other circumstances that indicate the reasons for suspicion of money laundering or terrorism financing. When developing the list of indicators from paragraph 1 of this Article, the lawyer shall also include in the list the indicators published on the APML’s website. Record keeping Article 62 The lawyer shall keep records of the following data: 1) details of customers, business relationships and transactions referred to in Article 8 of this Law; 2) data sent to the APML pursuant to Article 58 of this Law. IV ACTIONS AND MEASURES TAKEN BY NOTARIES PUBLIC Establishing the identity of a customer Article 63 A notary public shall identify a customer in line with the regulations which govern the activity of notaries public. Reporting to the APML on persons and transactions with respect to which there are reasons for suspicion of money laundering or terrorism financing Article 64 In a notary public, when drafting a notarial deed and verifying a private identification document (notarisation), established that in relation to a customer or transaction there are reasons to suspect money laundering or terrorism financing, he shall inform the APML thereof without delay. If the notary public, either due to the nature of transaction or other justified reason, cannot act as laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article, it shall inform the APML thereof as soon as possible. The notary public shall make a written statement explaining the reasons why he did not act as prescribed. The notary public shall file the reports to the APML electronically. In a case of urgency, such report may be delivered also by telephone, in which case it shall consequently be sent to the APML electronically no later than the next business day. Obligation to provide data Article 65