Are they going on to further study (in like FOE or different FOEs)? Program monitoring Are there sufficient resources to Student and staff Feedback Review Team to meet the demand for the decide 4. Employer/Industry feedback program? Examine Learning and Teaching the Consultants (Curriculum) learning Do students have access to Student Feedback Review Team to adequate IT, electronic or decide in physical library and information which the sources, and specialist program equipment in order to achieve is offered the learning program’s outcomes and ensure program quality? What processes are used to Program Director ensure cross-campus consistency and equivalence of student experience (where applicable)? What impact, if any, are Student:Staff Ratio Program Director ratios having on student to discuss with Student feedback experience, learning and Group Learning satisfaction? What strategies and Teaching are in place to address issues Consultants identified? (Design) Does the program: Student feedback Course Experience Questionnaire 5. Program Director provide students with the (CEQ) /Student Experience of opportunity to develop the Evaluate Course (SEC) qualitative knowledge, skills and the comments application of knowledge currency appropriate for its AQF level and link theory to practice? SEC/SET data ensure that course and program level outcomes can of the Mapping from the Course be assessed and attained? program Profile system provide a developmental content CEQ data and comments and sequence in student’s structure learning? draw from current and Survey of stakeholders’ emerging knowledge in one experiences of the program or more disciplines and include relevant theoretical frameworks and research findings? have gaps or repetition in program content? take into consideration entry and exit pathways, including articulation from other studies and to further studies? ensure the development of the Griffith Graduate Attributes?
Are they going on to further study (in like FOE or different FOEs)? Program monitoring 4. Examine the learning in which the program is offered Are there sufficient resources to meet the demand for the program? Student and staff Feedback Employer/Industry feedback Learning and Teaching Consultants (Curriculum) Review Team to decide Do students have access to adequate IT, electronic or physical library and information sources, and specialist equipment in order to achieve the program’s learning outcomes and ensure program quality? Student Feedback Review Team to decide What processes are used to ensure cross-campus consistency and equivalence of student experience (where applicable)? Program Director What impact, if any, are ratios having on student experience, learning and satisfaction? What strategies are in place to address issues identified? Student:Staff Ratio Student feedback Program Director to discuss with Group Learning and Teaching Consultants (Design) 5. Evaluate the currency and of the program content and structure Does the program: provide students with the opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills and application of knowledge appropriate for its AQF level link theory to practice? ensure that course and program level outcomes can be assessed and attained? provide a developmental sequence in student’s learning? draw from current and emerging knowledge in one or more disciplines and include relevant theoretical frameworks and research findings? have gaps or repetition in program content? take into consideration entry and exit pathways, including articulation from other studies and to further studies? ensure the development of the Griffith Graduate Attributes? Student feedback Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) /Student Experience of Course (SEC) qualitative comments SEC/SET data Mapping from the Course Profile system CEQ data and comments Survey of stakeholders’ experiences of the program Program Director