Stratton R, A meta-analysis of Meta-analysis readmission in 15/16, A systematic 2013[] six RCT those receiving 94% review and N = 852) nutritional supplements meta-analysis of Odds Ratio (OR) 0.59, the impact of Aim to explore effect 95% CI oral nutritional of nutritional P = 0.001 supplements on supplements on readmission. hospital Inclusion criteria readmissions. >18. 5/6 studies included older people (>65 years) Systematic Cawood AL, This systematic Meta-analysis Reduced readmissions to 14/16, review and 2012[] review involved 36 and hospital in ONS group 88% meta-analysis of randomised systematic (OR 0.59 (95% CI effects of high controlled trials review p=0.004 protein oral (n=3790) nutritional Explored high supplements protein ONS (>20% energy from protein) V normal diet or placebo
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of oral nutritional supplements on hospital readmissions. Stratton R, 2013[] A meta-analysis of six RCT N = 852) Aim to explore effect of nutritional supplements on readmission. Inclusion criteria >18. 5/6 studies included older people (>65 years) Meta-analysis readmission in those receiving nutritional supplements Odds Ratio (OR) 0.59, 95% CI P = 0.001 15/16, 94% Systematic review and meta-analysis of effects of high protein oral nutritional supplements Cawood AL, 2012[] This systematic review involved 36 randomised controlled trials (n=3790) Explored high protein ONS (>20% energy from protein) V normal diet or placebo Meta-analysis and systematic review Reduced readmissions to hospital in ONS group (OR 0.59 (95% CI p=0.004 14/16, 88%