Appendix A 2012-13 Speaking Rubric Link to GE Does Not Meet Assessment Expectation Courses Mapping (Score 1-2) Meets Expectation (Score 3-4) Exceeds Expectation (Score 4-5) Compose ENGL 2c.1 Speaking: Thesis is not Thesis is clear and supported by Thesis is convincing and strongly supported oral, 103 explicitly stated or is appropriate evidence (e.g., outside source with evidence (e.g., outside source Compose oral, not supported by information,use of logic, crediblity of the information,use of logic, crediblity of the thesis-driven arguments evidence (e.g., speaker, eliciting an emotional response) speaker, eliciting an emotional response) arguments that include that include outside source appropriate appropriate information,use of evidence evidence logic, crediblity of the speaker, eliciting an emotional response) Use ENGL 2c.1 Speaking: Uses insufficient Source material supports thesis or Uses a variety of source material (e.g., appropriate 103 Compose oral, supporting material establishes the presenter's credibility on examples, illustrations, quotations, statistics) sources to thesis-driven or material that is the subject to support thesis and establish presenter's support arguments that unrelated to credibility on the subject arguments arguments include appropriate evidence Engage with ENGL 2c.2 Speaking Delivery techniques Delivery techniques (e.g., body language, Delivery techniques (e.g., body language, audiences 103 (as written) (e.g., body language, posture, eye contact, vocal posture, eye contact, vocal expressiveness) through posture, eye contact, expressiveness) make the presentation make the presentation interesting and effective and vocal understandable. The speaker appears memorable. The speaker appears confident appropriate expressiveness) are relaxed. The language choices are and polished.The language choices are delivery unclear and thoughtful and support the effectiveness imaginative and ehance the effectiveness of inappropriate for of the presentation. Language used is the presentation. Language used is clear and audience clear and appropriate to the audience. appropriate to the audience.
Appendix A 2012-13 Speaking Rubric Courses Link to GE Assessment Mapping Does Not Meet Expectation (Score 1-2) Meets Expectation (Score 3-4) Exceeds Expectation (Score 4-5) Compose oral, arguments that include appropriate evidence ENGL 103 2c.1 Speaking: Compose oral, thesis-driven arguments that include appropriate evidence Thesis is not explicitly stated or is not supported by evidence (e.g., outside source information,use of logic, crediblity of the speaker, eliciting an emotional response) Thesis is clear and supported by appropriate evidence (e.g., outside source information,use of logic, crediblity of the speaker, eliciting an emotional response) Thesis is convincing and strongly supported with evidence (e.g., outside source information,use of logic, crediblity of the speaker, eliciting an emotional response) Use appropriate sources to support arguments ENGL 103 2c.1 Speaking: Compose oral, thesis-driven arguments that include appropriate evidence Uses insufficient supporting material or material that is unrelated to arguments Source material supports thesis or establishes the presenter's credibility on the subject Uses a variety of source material (e.g., examples, illustrations, quotations, statistics) to support thesis and establish presenter's credibility on the subject Engage with audiences through effective and appropriate delivery ENGL 103 2c.2 Speaking (as written) Delivery techniques (e.g., body language, posture, eye contact, vocal expressiveness) are unclear and inappropriate for audience Delivery techniques (e.g., body language, posture, eye contact, vocal expressiveness) make the presentation understandable. The speaker appears relaxed. The language choices are thoughtful and support the effectiveness of the presentation. Language used is clear and appropriate to the audience. Delivery techniques (e.g., body language, posture, eye contact, vocal expressiveness) make the presentation interesting and memorable. The speaker appears confident and polished.The language choices are imaginative and ehance the effectiveness of the presentation. Language used is clear and appropriate to the audience.