active opportunities to connections, and discover learn. new ideas. Describe how the program will make time for reflection (that is thought or consideration of an “careful idea or with the intent of making change or focusing on improvement”). Provide any methods, procedures, activities, and background information that will influence this practice. Poor Fair Good Excellent Review Rubric 0 1 2 3 Participant Reflection The applicant provides little The applicant provides, The applicant details specific "Good" criteria and: or no detail about the though at a high level, opportunities for participant Participants, upon opportunities it will provide opportunities for participant reflection on activities and reflection, are given for students to reflect on reflection on activities and learning that are opportunities to journal or their academic activities. learning. It is unclear, meaningfully linked to otherwise write and record however, how these participant articulated their ideas and thoughts on opportunities for reflection and their progress toward the program and are meaningfully linked to meeting those goals. participant articulated goals and their progress toward meeting those goals. Supportive Activities The applicant provides little Activities referenced do not Activities referenced meet "Good" criteria and: or no detail about how appear to meet youth in youth in regard to their Examples are where activities will meet youth in regard to their development, skill level, activities are connected regard to their development, skill level, readiness, and interest. with participant’s development, skill level, readiness, or interest. Methods include hands-on subject content and readiness, or interest. Methods are vague or are in opportunities to interact participants’ preferences. conflict with hands-on, with materials, make active opportunities to connections, and discover learn. new ideas.
active opportunities to learn. connections, and discover new ideas. Describe how the program will make time for reflection (that is “careful thought or consideration of an idea or with the intent of making change or focusing on improvement”). Provide any methods, procedures, activities, and background information that will influence this practice. Review Rubric Poor Fair Good Excellent 0 1 2 3 Participant Reflection The applicant provides little or no detail about the opportunities it will provide for students to reflect on their academic activities. The applicant provides, though at a high level, opportunities for participant reflection on activities and learning. It is unclear, however, how these opportunities for reflection are meaningfully linked to participant articulated goals and their progress toward meeting those goals. The applicant details specific opportunities for participant reflection on activities and learning that are meaningfully linked to participant articulated and their progress toward meeting those goals. "Good" criteria and: Participants, upon reflection, are given opportunities to journal or otherwise write and record their ideas and thoughts on the program and Supportive Activities The applicant provides little or no detail about how activities will meet youth in regard to their development, skill level, readiness, or interest. Activities referenced do not appear to meet youth in regard to their development, skill level, readiness, or interest. Methods are vague or are in conflict with hands-on, active opportunities to learn. Activities referenced meet youth in regard to their development, skill level, readiness, and interest. Methods include hands-on opportunities to interact with materials, make connections, and discover new ideas. "Good" criteria and: Examples are where activities are connected with participant’s subject content and participants’ preferences.