Targeted Support Desired Outcome Chosen What is the evidence and How will you ensure it is Staff Lead When will you review action/approach rationale for this choice? implemented well? implementation? To identify gaps in Analyse Data to To track and monitor Data analysis. SLT to identify Half termly data learning and provide identify children who children accessing children for analysis targeted intervention are not making intervention over a longer intervention from Performance management sessions to support PP sufficient progress or time period to ensure that data analysis. of TAs. Termly Pupil Progress children in narrowing meeting age related there is sufficient impact. Meetings. the gap in attainment expectations. SLT to hold meeting throughout school. Using TA time to target with TA to review TA timetables adapted specific gaps in impact after a block to allow them to work understanding based on of intervention. with groups across their training. school based on the PP Lead/SENDCO skills and training they EEF Toolkit suggests that to monitor provision have. average gain could be 4-5 maps for each year months if PP pupils work group. Use of Provision Map alongside non-PP pupils. to monitor access to interventions of children who receive PP and/or SEN Funding. Budgeted Cost: £15,000 Run cycles of ten Teachers to identify gaps in PP Lead to scrutinize GW (Headteacher) Termly after each weeks of after school knowledge and planning for sessions. block of tuition. tuition in Reading or understanding and group AF Maths for vulnerable children, including higher (Deputy Head/UKS2 Learning walks of sessions groups, including attainers. Phase Lead) to be completed by PP higher attainers. This lead. is initially in Y6 but EEF Toolkit suggests that VM moving throughout average gain could be 4-5 (Pupil Premium Data analysis and tracking KS2 in Spring and months. Lead) of children involved at Summer terms. Pupil Progress Meetings in the relevant term.
Targeted Support Desired Outcome Chosen action/approach What is the evidence and rationale for this choice? How will you ensure it is implemented well? Staff Lead When will you review implementation? To identify gaps in learning and provide targeted intervention sessions to support PP children in narrowing the gap in attainment throughout school. Analyse Data to identify children who are not making sufficient progress or meeting age related expectations. TA timetables adapted to allow them to work with groups across school based on the skills and training they have. Use of Provision Map to monitor access to interventions of children who receive PP and/or SEN Funding. To track and monitor children accessing intervention over a longer time period to ensure that there is sufficient impact. Using TA time to target specific gaps in understanding based on their training. EEF Toolkit suggests that average gain could be 4-5 months if PP pupils work alongside non-PP pupils. Data analysis. Performance management of TAs. SLT to identify children for intervention from data analysis. SLT to hold meeting with TA to review impact after a block of intervention. PP Lead/SENDCO to monitor provision maps for each year group. Half termly data analysis Termly Pupil Progress Meetings. Budgeted Cost: £15,000 Run cycles of ten weeks of after school tuition in Reading or Maths for vulnerable groups, including higher attainers. This is initially in Y6 but moving throughout KS2 in Spring and Summer terms. Teachers to identify gaps in knowledge and understanding and group children, including higher attainers. EEF Toolkit suggests that average gain could be 4-5 months. PP Lead to scrutinize planning for sessions. Learning walks of sessions to be completed by PP lead. Data analysis and tracking of children involved at Pupil Progress Meetings in the relevant term. GW (Headteacher) AF (Deputy Head/UKS2 Phase Lead) VM (Pupil Premium Lead) Termly after each block of tuition.