Score of 1 Score of 2 Score of 3 Score of 4 Criteria 2: Understanding of the solutions Very few nodes on the Many solutions efforts A thorough look at The submission is solutions landscape are listed and some different solution exceptional in its landscape are identified, or many are explored in models is included, analysis of the are identified yet they Some models are plus a comparison of solutions landscape. It Does the submission clearly articulate the overall are not explored in any identified, yet the their efforts. Different not only includes a solutions landscape in a concise and descriptive way, depth (simply a list or depth of analysis is not types of efforts wide look at the efforts including acknowledgement of a diverse range of groupings of logos very robust. Little or no (business, both locally and existing players, resources and networks? without exploring their effort is focused on the government, globally from which Does the submission demonstrate a deeper work). space the etc) are lessons can be drawn, “between” understanding of the nature and diversity of the efforts (i.e. explored and but also thoroughly existing solutions, including an understanding of what government support, tangential efforts, examines the space has worked, what hasn’t and the change needed? knowledge sharing, which could be learned between the efforts etc). from, are discussed. and the links between Does the submission explore some of the models for different solutions. change being tried and what distinguishes the approaches? Does the submission look between the organizations by not only listing specific organizations but also looking at what joins up some of the efforts? Score awarded for Criteria 2: Score of 1 Score of 2 Score of 3 Score of 4
Score of 1 Score of 2 Score of 3 Score of 4 Criteria 2: Understanding of the solutions landscape Does the submission clearly articulate the overall solutions landscape in a concise and descriptive way, including acknowledgement of a diverse range of existing players, resources and networks? Does the submission demonstrate a deeper understanding of the nature and diversity of the existing solutions, including an understanding of what has worked, what hasn’t and the change needed? Does the submission explore some of the models for change being tried and what distinguishes the approaches? Does the submission look between the organizations by not only listing specific organizations but also looking at what joins up some of the efforts? Very few nodes on the solutions landscape are identified, or many are identified yet they are not explored in any depth (simply a list or groupings of logos without exploring their work). Many solutions efforts are listed and some are explored in Some models are identified, yet the depth of analysis is not very robust. Little or no effort is focused on the space “between” the efforts (i.e. government support, knowledge sharing, etc). A thorough look at different solution models is included, plus a comparison of their efforts. Different types of efforts (business, government, etc) are explored and tangential efforts, which could be learned from, are discussed. The submission is exceptional in its analysis of the solutions landscape. It not only includes a wide look at the efforts both locally and globally from which lessons can be drawn, but also thoroughly examines the space between the efforts and the links between different solutions. Score awarded for Criteria 2: Score of 1 Score of 2 Score of 3 Score of 4