Here we show that female preference for secondary sexual traits in male face shapes varies with the probability of conception across the menstrual (741) cycle.” female might choose a “A conception risk “However, primary partner whose low interacted with type of relationship masculine appearance suggests (short-term or long-term; cooperation in parental care 2 fertility (high vs. For a F(1,47)=5.39, P=0.025). preferences are low) x 2 (‘long-term’ short-term sexual relationship, the unchanged across the menstrual relationship context et al. preferred face shape was less cycle) but occasionally copulate (short-term vs. F(1,47)=5.39, P=0.025 (1999), feminine during the with a male with a more long-term) Study 2 phase, whereas masculine appearance predicting attraction preferences remained constant when (indicating good to facial masculinity women judged attractiveness for a immunocompetence) when long-term relationship (Fig. 1c).” conception is most (p. likely.” (741) 741-742) Fertility (continuous) x 2 test whether low “Specifically, I pitch (raised vs. the other hand, there was a “On male VP (1) increases lowered) x 2 significant three-way interaction sexual attractiveness more relationship context between P manipulation, mating = F(1,106)=3.24, p Puts (2005) than long-term relationship (short-term vs. context, and fertility [F(1,106)=3.24, .037 attractiveness, (2) is more long-term) as predicted (p. p=.037], (Fig. 1).” attractive to women nearer peak predicting ratings of 393) (p. 390) fertility…” male vocal attractiveness Roney, the subset of cases with a Main effect of measures ANOVA “For “Repeated Simmons, testing session near ovulation, fertility (high vs. revealed that, as predicted, women (1, 17) = 4.84, = F p & Gray we also predicted that women low) predicting exhibited stronger preferences for 0.043 (2011) would exhibit stronger attraction to facial the high testosterone faces when
Here we show that female preference for secondary sexual traits in male face shapes varies with the probability of conception across the menstrual cycle.” (741) et al. (1999), Study 2 “A female might choose a primary partner whose low masculine appearance suggests cooperation in parental care (‘long-term’ preferences are unchanged across the menstrual cycle) but occasionally copulate with a male with a more masculine appearance (indicating good immunocompetence) when conception is most likely.” (p. 741-742) 2 fertility (high vs. low) x 2 relationship context (short-term vs. long-term) predicting attraction to facial masculinity “However, conception risk interacted with type of relationship (short-term or long-term; F(1,47)=5.39, P=0.025). For a short-term sexual relationship, the preferred face shape was less feminine during the phase, whereas preferences remained constant when women judged attractiveness for a long-term relationship (Fig. 1c).” (741) F(1,47)=5.39, P=0.025 Puts (2005) “Specifically, I test whether low male VP (1) increases sexual attractiveness more than long-term relationship attractiveness, (2) is more attractive to women nearer peak fertility…” (p. 390) Fertility (continuous) x 2 pitch (raised vs. lowered) x 2 relationship context (short-term vs. long-term) predicting ratings of male vocal attractiveness “On the other hand, there was a significant three-way interaction between P manipulation, mating context, and fertility [F(1,106)=3.24, p=.037], as predicted (Fig. 1).” (p. 393) F(1,106)=3.24, p = .037 Roney, Simmons, & Gray (2011) “For the subset of cases with a testing session near ovulation, we also predicted that women would exhibit stronger Main effect of fertility (high vs. low) predicting attraction to facial “Repeated measures ANOVA revealed that, as predicted, women exhibited stronger preferences for the high testosterone faces when F (1, 17) = 4.84, p = 0.043