Milpitas 1, Service outage Not eligible for October 10, for 987 “damaged 2012, PG&E customers pipe” rule. crew relied on inaccurate plat Not due to map showing poor nonemergency recordkeeping, distribution this incident main valve was the result was of poor “open” when it was operational actually management, and resulted in “closed” PG&E crew large service did not outage. monitor pressure Find that each gauges which service were showing interruption is pressures a separate inconsistent violation. with engineering model Milpitas 2, Gas release $50,000 March 4, 2013, contractor dug 1 violation @ into $50,000 mismarked 2 inch plastic distribution main Mountain Gas release $100,000 View, July 30, 2013, PG&E
Milpitas 1, October 10, 2012, PG&E crew relied on inaccurate plat map showing nonemergency distribution main valve was “open” when it was actually “closed” PG&E crew did not monitor pressure gauges which were showing pressures inconsistent with engineering model Service outage for 987 customers Not eligible for “damaged pipe” rule. Not due to poor recordkeeping, this incident was the result of poor operational management, and resulted in large service outage. Find that each service interruption is a separate violation. Milpitas 2, March 4, 2013, contractor dug into mismarked 2 inch plastic distribution main Gas release $50,000 1 violation @ $50,000 Mountain View, July 30, 2013, PG&E Gas release $100,000