there. “Advanced.” Deviation 0 -1 0 Though some of the errors in work shown are below the overall volume of Identified Issues N/A errors is not significant N/A enough to place this response in the “Below Proficient” category. Calibration Training-Student Sample #2 Anchored Advanced Performance Level Panelist Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Performance Level Advanced Advanced Advanced Assigned Very few errors in the SR and The overall score and student’s The work shown CR sections. The one incorrect the quality of work shown is Performance Level is easy to follow CR answer was off by less higher than what I have seen Rationale and mostly than 1 degree, indicating a from most of the 9th graders I correct. minor miscalculation. have worked with. Deviation 0 0 0 Identified Issues N/A N/A N/A Calibration Training-Student Sample #3 Anchored Below Proficient Performance Level Panelist Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Performance Level Below Proficient Below Proficient Below Proficient Assigned Even if the CR answers Student did not follow The student missed Performance Level were correct, there is directions for many CR items. and/or skipped well Rationale still little to no work Most answers are labeled with over half of the items shown to justify them. incorrect units of measure. on the assessment. Deviation 0 0 0 Identified Issues N/A N/A N/A Build Phase-Meeting 2 Meeting Date: May 8, 2014 Panelists/Qualifications: P. Lopez (District Department Chair), D. Freeman (High School Instructional Coach), N. Bryant (High School Instructional Coach) Subject/Grade Level of Assessment/Task: Mathematics Grade 9 End of Course (EOC) Exam Performance Levels and Descriptors-Draft Set (from Meeting 1) Advanced Proficient Below Proficient Students at this level consistently Students at this level frequently, Students at this level inconsistently, and effectively demonstrate accurately, and satisfactorily inadequately, and partially
“Advanced.” there. Deviation 0 -1 0 Identified Issues N/A Though some of the errors in work shown are below the overall volume of errors is not significant enough to place this response in the “Below Proficient” category. N/A Calibration Training-Student Sample #2 Anchored Performance Level Advanced Panelist Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Performance Level Assigned Advanced Advanced Advanced Performance Level Rationale The work shown is easy to follow and mostly correct. Very few errors in the SR and CR sections. The one incorrect CR answer was off by less than 1 degree, indicating a minor miscalculation. The student’s overall score and the quality of work shown is higher than what I have seen from most of the 9th graders I have worked with. Deviation 0 0 0 Identified Issues N/A N/A N/A Calibration Training-Student Sample #3 Anchored Performance Level Below Proficient Panelist Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Performance Level Assigned Below Proficient Below Proficient Below Proficient Performance Level Rationale Even if the CR answers were correct, there is still little to no work shown to justify them. Student did not follow directions for many CR items. Most answers are labeled with incorrect units of measure. The student missed and/or skipped well over half of the items on the assessment. Deviation 0 0 0 Identified Issues N/A N/A N/A Build Phase-Meeting 2 Meeting Date: May 8, 2014 Panelists/Qualifications: P. Lopez (District Department Chair), D. Freeman (High School Instructional Coach), N. Bryant (High School Instructional Coach) Subject/Grade Level of Assessment/Task: Mathematics Grade 9 End of Course (EOC) Exam Performance Levels and Descriptors-Draft Set (from Meeting 1) Advanced Proficient Below Proficient Students at this level consistently and effectively demonstrate Students at this level frequently, accurately, and satisfactorily Students at this level inconsistently, inadequately, and partially