upwards as funds shifted within fund-shifting rules are authorized expenditures. This Resolution rejects PG&E’s comments related to C&S Award Cap and makes no adjustments to the C&S expenditure incentives in response to PG&E’s comments. The C&S award cap is adopted in D.13-09-023 and will not be adjusted in this Resolution. SoCalGas’ comments note that SoCalGas recommends that the ESPI process would benefit from additional collaboration and transparency so the discrepancies and irregularities between the information of Energy Division and SoCalGas can be communicated earlier in the process. Staff supports improving the ESPI process with additional collaboration and transparency with the utilities. SoCalGas identified three technical changes in it PY 2014 energy savings that should be made in the Resolution: 1. Home Upgrade Program, 2. Thermostatic Valve with 1.6 GPM Showerhead, and 3. EUL/RUL changes for Tank Insulation. This Resolution rejects SoCalGas’s comments related to the technical changes and makes no adjustments to the savings-related incentives. Staff finds that the Uncertain Measures List includes all Home Upgrade Program Projects so the savings cannot be claimed on an ex ante basis. In addition, SoCalGas shall clarify whether or not those projects are deemed or custom and how the savings are calculated in their next ESPI application. Staff also finds that the Thermostatic Valve with 1.6 GPM Showerhead is on the Uncertain Measures List so the savings cannot be claimed on an ex ante basis. Staff review the methodology for EUL/RUL for Tank Insulation measures and finds that no changes are necessary. SDG&E’s comments on the Draft Resolution state that it disagrees with the adjustment that resulted from the UAFCB examination of SDG&E’s PY 2013
upwards as funds shifted within fund-shifting rules are authorized expenditures. This Resolution rejects PG&E’s comments related to C&S Award Cap and makes no adjustments to the C&S expenditure incentives in response to PG&E’s comments. The C&S award cap is adopted in D.13-09-023 and will not be adjusted in this Resolution. SoCalGas’ comments note that SoCalGas recommends that the ESPI process would benefit from additional collaboration and transparency so the discrepancies and irregularities between the information of Energy Division and SoCalGas can be communicated earlier in the process. Staff supports improving the ESPI process with additional collaboration and transparency with the utilities. SoCalGas identified three technical changes in it PY 2014 energy savings that should be made in the Resolution: 1. Home Upgrade Program, 2. Thermostatic Valve with 1.6 GPM Showerhead, and 3. EUL/RUL changes for Tank Insulation. This Resolution rejects SoCalGas’s comments related to the technical changes and makes no adjustments to the savings-related incentives. Staff finds that the Uncertain Measures List includes all Home Upgrade Program Projects so the savings cannot be claimed on an ex ante basis. In addition, SoCalGas shall clarify whether or not those projects are deemed or custom and how the savings are calculated in their next ESPI application. Staff also finds that the Thermostatic Valve with 1.6 GPM Showerhead is on the Uncertain Measures List so the savings cannot be claimed on an ex ante basis. Staff review the methodology for EUL/RUL for Tank Insulation measures and finds that no changes are necessary. SDG&E’s comments on the Draft Resolution state that it disagrees with the adjustment that resulted from the UAFCB examination of SDG&E’s PY 2013