be cited as a site. Although this is locations, further contributory factor. already in separate existing displaced from proposals potential for mental health impact exists. services. Indicative consideration of refurb costs potentially adjacent to new build with constrained design. Does it meet the Investment Objectives (Fully, Partially, No, n/a): Do Nothing i: Proposed Proposed As existing Solution ii Solution v arrangements Investment Objective 1 Improve patient No Partial environment and safety Investment Objective 2 - Achieve service Partial Partial benefits of co-location Investment Objective 3 Improve access for No Fully Partial – patients Investment Objective 4- Improve staff No Fully Partial retention, recruitment and wellbeing Investment Objective 5- Improve efficiency No Fully Partial of estate Investment Objective No Fully Partial 6- Community Benefits Are the indicative costs likely to present value for money and be affordable? (Yes, maybe / unknown, no) Vfm & Affordability No Yes No Preferred / Possible / Rejected Rejected Preferred Rejected Complex Elderly Mental Health services Do Nothing i: Proposed Proposed As existing Solution ii Solution v arrangements No change for staff Modern accommodation. Improved Advantages and therefore no Single room en-suite of an accommodation. (Strengths & disruption from the appropriate size. Improved Potential for Opportunities) current location. access to outdoor areas and reduced incidents. Allows staff to plan environment for service future in knowledge users. Better opportunity for that no change to reduced incidence of current ward incidents. Vastly improved
be cited as a contributory factor. site. Although this is already in separate existing proposals potential for impact exists. locations, further displaced from mental health services. Indicative consideration of refurb costs potentially adjacent to new build with constrained design. Does it meet the Investment Objectives (Fully, Partially, No, n/a): Do Nothing i: As existing arrangements Proposed Solution ii Proposed Solution v Investment Objective 1 Improve patient environment and safety No Partial Investment Objective 2 - Achieve service benefits of co-location Partial Partial Investment Objective 3 – Improve access for patients No Fully Partial Investment Objective 4- Improve staff retention, recruitment and wellbeing No Fully Partial Investment Objective 5- Improve efficiency of estate No Fully Partial Investment Objective 6- Community Benefits No Fully Partial Are the indicative costs likely to present value for money and be affordable? (Yes, maybe / unknown, no) Vfm & Affordability No Yes No Preferred / Possible / Rejected Rejected Preferred Rejected Complex Elderly Mental Health services Do Nothing i: As existing arrangements Proposed Solution ii Proposed Solution v Advantages (Strengths & Opportunities) No change for staff and therefore no disruption from the current location. Allows staff to plan future in knowledge that no change to current ward Modern accommodation. Single room en-suite of an appropriate size. Improved access to outdoor areas and environment for service users. Better opportunity for reduced incidence of incidents. Vastly improved Improved accommodation. Potential for reduced incidents.