Public sector Upgrading of the Upgraded risk of Introduced into MJU EU funds bodies collect the risk of corruption corruption register all public (NFP MF data on their risk register managed as part of a single administration of corruption in by the KPK, register of risks bodies KPK one place in a along with the transparent establishment of manner: the KPK a single register and other of all risks supervisory bodies are allowed access to them; the statistics are to be available to the public Proactively Limited risk of Upgrading of the Upgraded public Use in all MJU EU funds limit the risk of corruption in the public procurement (PP) public (NFP corruption MF field of public procurement portal which administration procurement and (PP) portal so ensures mandatory bodies tenders that clients will publication of have to publish contracts from PP, contracts from concessions and PP, concessions public-private and partnerships, and established partnerships; application for the establishment of publication of an application for documents and the publication of contracts in tender documents and procedures contracts in tender procedures Quality management systems in public administration The aim of the quality management system is principally to obtain the strategic objective of “improving the quality systems, programme planning, business supervision, measurable targets and process With the systematic application of quality control tools, this system will expand across all indicators”. public administration bodies, in addition to administrative units as well as ministries, government offices, bodies affiliated to ministries and others in order to improve the transparency and efficiency of the functioning of the public administration. Existing situation In 2014, Slovenia deteriorated in both indicators: 55th place in the world competitiveness ranking prepared by the IMD and 56th place in the global competitiveness index of the WEF in 2013. The key factors also affecting entrepreneurship include inefficient public administration and corruption. The efficiency of public administration places Slovenia below the European average. The European Commission assesses that inefficient public administration is one of the main obstacles in the way of business competitiveness and economic development in several Member States; therefore, they
Proactively limit the risk of corruption Public sector bodies collect the data on their risk of corruption in one place in a transparent manner: the KPK and other supervisory bodies are allowed access to them; the statistics are to be available to the public Upgrading of the risk of corruption register managed by the KPK, along with the establishment of a single register of all risks Upgraded risk of corruption register as part of a single register of risks Introduced into all public administration bodies MJU MF KPK EU funds (NFP Limited risk of corruption in the field of public procurement and tenders Upgrading of the public procurement (PP) portal so that clients will have to publish contracts from PP, concessions and partnerships; establishment of an application for the publication of documents and contracts in tender procedures Upgraded public procurement (PP) portal which ensures mandatory publication of contracts from PP, concessions and public-private partnerships, and established application for the publication of documents and contracts in tender procedures Use in all public administration bodies MJU MF EU funds (NFP Quality management systems in public administration The aim of the quality management system is principally to obtain the strategic objective of “improving the quality systems, programme planning, business supervision, measurable targets and process indicators”. With the systematic application of quality control tools, this system will expand across all public administration bodies, in addition to administrative units as well as ministries, government offices, bodies affiliated to ministries and others in order to improve the transparency and efficiency of the functioning of the public administration. Existing situation In 2014, Slovenia deteriorated in both indicators: 55th place in the world competitiveness ranking prepared by the IMD and 56th place in the global competitiveness index of the WEF in 2013. The key factors also affecting entrepreneurship include inefficient public administration and corruption. The efficiency of public administration places Slovenia below the European average. The European Commission assesses that inefficient public administration is one of the main obstacles in the way of business competitiveness and economic development in several Member States; therefore, they