9. Percent of districts with Monitoring disproportionate representation of Activities: racial and ethnic groups in special Local education that is the result of APR, Data Review, inappropriate identification. Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 10. Percent of districts with Dispute disproportionate representation of Resolution: racial and ethnic groups in specific Complaints, disability categories that is the result of Hearings inappropriate identification. 0 0 0 11. Percent of children who were Monitoring evaluated within 60 days of receiving Activities: parental consent for initial evaluation Local or, if the State establishes a timeframe APR, Data Review, 24 24 24 within which the evaluation must be Desk Audit, conducted, within that timeframe. Visits, or Other Dispute Resolution: 10 11 11 Complaints, Hearings 12. Percent of children referred by Part Monitoring C prior to age 3, who are found eligible Activities: for Part B, and who have an IEP Local developed and implemented by their APR, Data Review, 5 5 4 third birthdays. Desk Audit, Visits, or Other Dispute Resolution: Complaints, 0 0 0 Hearings 13. Percent of youth aged 16 and Monitoring above with IEP that includes Activities: appropriate measurable postsecondary Local goals that are annually updated and APR, Data Review, 16 16 16 based upon an age appropriate Desk Audit, transition assessment, transition Visits, or services, including courses of study, Other that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, Dispute and annual IEP goals related to the Resolution: transition service needs. Complaints, student’s 0 0 0 Hearings Other areas of noncompliance: Faculty, Monitoring Staff and Administration Activities: Local APR, Data Review, 9 11 11 Desk Audit, Visits, or Other
9. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education that is the result of inappropriate identification. Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 10. Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification. Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 0 0 0 11. Percent of children who were evaluated within 60 days of receiving parental consent for initial evaluation or, if the State establishes a timeframe within which the evaluation must be conducted, within that timeframe. Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 24 24 24 Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 10 11 11 12. Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays. Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 5 5 4 Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 0 0 0 13. Percent of youth aged 16 and above with IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student’s transition service needs. Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 16 16 16 Dispute Resolution: Complaints, Hearings 0 0 0 Other areas of noncompliance: Faculty, Staff and Administration Monitoring Activities: Local APR, Data Review, Desk Audit, Visits, or Other 9 11 11