Presentations and Project Assessment (0 to 20 points) Other Criteria 16 to 20 = Excellent; 11 to 15 = Very Good; 10 to 14 = Good; 6 to 10 = Poor Applicant Name Faculty Appointment Awards Letters of Presentation Project Quality Total Overall (Date and Faculty Name) (Document Number Reference (Clarity and Response to Questions) Score Ranking (Innovation and Feasibility) (Must be physicians or and Quality) (Review Strength and Points #1 = Best health care professionals Source of licensed to practice in Recommendations) Manitoba)
Other Criteria Presentations and Project Assessment (0 to 20 points) 16 to 20 = Excellent; 11 to 15 = Very Good; 10 to 14 = Good; 6 to 10 = Poor Applicant Name Faculty Appointment (Date and Faculty Name) (Must be physicians or health care professionals licensed to practice in Manitoba) Awards (Document Number and Quality) Letters of Reference (Review Strength and Source of Recommendations) Presentation (Clarity and Response to Questions) Project Quality (Innovation and Feasibility) Total Score Points Overall Ranking #1 = Best