Standard 2: Middle 9 Philosophy and School 2.67 0 22 78 .47 Organization I Standard 2: Middle Level 9 Philosophy and School 2.89 0 11 89 .31 Organization II 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target Case Studies 2012 Percent Scoring at Each Performance Level N Mean 1 2 3 SD Standard 1: Adolescent 14 2.9 0 21 79 .35 Development I Standard 2: Middle Level Philosophy and School 14 2.9 0 21 79 .35 Organization I Standard 2: Middle Level Philosophy and School 14 2.6 0 43 57 .49 Organization II 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target 2011 Percent Scoring at Each Performance N Mean 1 2 3 SD Standard 1: Young 17 2.9 0 16 94 .2 Adolescent Development I Standard 2: Middle Level Philosophy and School 17 2.7 0 29 71 .5 Organization I Standard 2: Middle Level Philosophy and School 17 2.3 0 71 29 .5 Organization II 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target 4. The case study assessments not only demonstrate candidates’ understanding of adolescent development, they also reveal candidates’ abilities to apply theory to practice in typical and diverse situations. This assessment demonstrates candidates’ knowledge of concepts, principles, theories and research young adolescent development (Standard 1) by reporting aspects of development theories of development in essays. This assessment demonstrates candidates’ ability to understand concepts, principles, theories and research underlying the philosophical and historical foundations of developmentally responsive middle level programs and schools effectively articulate developmentally responsive practices
Standard 2: Middle Philosophy and School Organization I 9 2.67 0 22 78 .47 Standard 2: Middle Level Philosophy and School Organization II 9 2.89 0 11 89 .31 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target Case Studies 2012 Percent Scoring at Each Performance Level N Mean 1 2 3 SD Standard 1: Adolescent Development I 14 2.9 0 21 79 .35 Standard 2: Middle Level Philosophy and School Organization I 14 2.9 0 21 79 .35 Standard 2: Middle Level Philosophy and School Organization II 14 2.6 0 43 57 .49 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target 2011 Percent Scoring at Each Performance N Mean 1 2 3 SD Standard 1: Young Adolescent Development I 17 2.9 0 16 94 .2 Standard 2: Middle Level Philosophy and School Organization I 17 2.7 0 29 71 .5 Standard 2: Middle Level Philosophy and School Organization II 17 2.3 0 71 29 .5 1= Unacceptable, 2=Acceptable, 3=Target 4. The case study assessments not only demonstrate candidates’ understanding of adolescent development, they also reveal candidates’ abilities to apply theory to practice in typical and diverse situations. This assessment demonstrates candidates’ knowledge of concepts, principles, theories and research young adolescent development (Standard 1) by reporting aspects of development theories of development in essays. This assessment demonstrates candidates’ ability to understand concepts, principles, theories and research underlying the philosophical and historical foundations of developmentally responsive middle level programs and schools effectively articulate developmentally responsive practices