Component: Criteria for the Evaluation Plan Part A: Measures and Evidence (16 points possible) – Describe how you will identify baseline data and use it to measure growth in the implementation of district’s Unbridled Learning goals (i.e., KCAS implementation, CCR) Describe how you will conduct on-going monitoring and reporting of progress in the grant initiatives. Criteria for the Evaluation Plan Part A: Measures and Evidence (16 pts possible) Identifies baseline data to (6-8 pts) (4-5 pts) (0-3 pts) be collected/utilized for Both qualitative and quantitative data Plan is mentioned but is somewhat Baseline data collection process is not measuring growth in the will be used as baseline data and the vague regarding specifically HOW the discussed OR only school level implementation of instruments to be used are identified for baseline data for both teachers AND standardized testing data is presented district’s Unbridled Learning (i.e., both teachers and students, including students will be collected. Few details as a baseline measure. evaluation at all five levels (Gusky of other measures/instruments are use of Innovation 2008). provided. Configuration Map* and PGES Implementation Rubric* to identify need) Identifies a plan to (6-8 pts) (4-5 pts) (0-3 pts) Both qualitative and quantitative data Qualitative or quantitative data will be The protocol for the collection of conduct on-going monitoring and reporting will be gathered and accessible to the gathered, however accessibility to the qualitative and/or quantitative data (e.g., necessary for effective district leadership team, point of contact, district leadership team, point of and/or accessibility if unclear. implementation and and the Effectiveness Coach for the contact, and/or the Effectiveness evaluation of the grant purpose of structuring support for Coach for the purpose of structuring outcomes) effective implementation and support for effective implementation evaluation. and evaluation is not clear. *See the Annotated Bibliography in the Appendix to learn more about Innovation Configuration Maps and/or the PGES Implementation Rubric and how these can be used to provide baseline data.
Component: Criteria for the Evaluation Plan – Part A: Measures and Evidence (16 points possible) Describe how you will identify baseline data and use it to measure growth in the district’s implementation of Unbridled Learning goals (i.e., KCAS implementation, CCR) Describe how you will conduct on-going monitoring and reporting of progress in the grant initiatives. Criteria for the Evaluation Plan Part A: Measures and Evidence (16 pts possible) Identifies baseline data to be collected/utilized for measuring growth in the district’s implementation of Unbridled Learning (i.e., use of Innovation Configuration Map* and PGES Implementation Rubric* to identify need) (6-8 pts) Both qualitative and quantitative data will be used as baseline data and the instruments to be used are identified for both teachers and students, including evaluation at all five levels (Gusky 2008). (4-5 pts) Plan is mentioned but is somewhat vague regarding specifically HOW the baseline data for both teachers AND students will be collected. Few details of other measures/instruments are provided. (0-3 pts) Baseline data collection process is not discussed OR only school level standardized testing data is presented as a baseline measure. Identifies a plan to conduct on-going monitoring and reporting (e.g., necessary for effective implementation and evaluation of the grant outcomes) (6-8 pts) Both qualitative and quantitative data will be gathered and accessible to the district leadership team, point of contact, and the Effectiveness Coach for the purpose of structuring support for effective implementation and evaluation. (4-5 pts) Qualitative or quantitative data will be gathered, however accessibility to the district leadership team, point of contact, and/or the Effectiveness Coach for the purpose of structuring support for effective implementation and evaluation is not clear. (0-3 pts) The protocol for the collection of qualitative and/or quantitative data and/or accessibility if unclear. *See the Annotated Bibliography in the Appendix to learn more about Innovation Configuration Maps and/or the PGES Implementation Rubric and how these can be used to provide baseline data.