Q. What document capture products do you currently have and do you intend/desire to continue to use them with the new solution or are you intending to replace the capture software as part of this procurement? A. SITSD and DLI are currently using FileNet Capture Professional and DataCap Taskmaster, respectively. We are open to both continuing to use our current solutions and using a new one. A December 2013 state-wide survey identified at least 9 different data capture hardware manufacturers and a half dozen capture software vendors in use at the State. Q. The RFP describe capabilities of the solution without detailing the explicit scope or requirement; can we interpret that to mean that the platform must have the capabilities listed, and that they must be demonstrable however, that there is no particular scope that needs to be estimated for these Section 3 unless detailed in the RFP explicitly? “capabilities” A. Yes. Q. The RFP mentions integration to systems such as and other integrations: “Wendia”, “mWorks”, a. Can we assume that the of work in this regard is limited to explaining how the system handles integration or is integration with other systems (e.g. ERM, BPM, etc.) within the scope of this project? b. If so, which systems and what level of integration is anticipated and can you please provide P 20 3.2.5.5 the API (web services, object interface, etc.) information as provided by the software vendor? And And P 16 3.2.2.1 A. See the answers to questions 1 and 60 in Addendum 1 of this RFP. Actual integration of the solution with MWorks and the other existing application using FileNet is part of the scope of the project. For the other existing systems and products mentioned, the State is interested in knowing how your solution would integrate with those products, but the actual integration is not included in the scope of this product. Q. Is Active Directory properly configured with the fields, users, groups, permissions and roles anticipated to be used in the solution? A. Not yet.
Q. What document capture products do you currently have and do you intend/desire to continue to use them with the new solution or are you intending to replace the capture software as part of this procurement? A. SITSD and DLI are currently using FileNet Capture Professional and DataCap Taskmaster, respectively. We are open to both continuing to use our current solutions and using a new one. A December 2013 state-wide survey identified at least 9 different data capture hardware manufacturers and a half dozen capture software vendors in use at the State. Section 3 Q. The RFP describe capabilities of the solution without detailing the explicit scope or requirement; can we interpret that to mean that the platform must have the capabilities listed, and that they must be demonstrable however, that there is no particular scope that needs to be estimated for these “capabilities” unless detailed in the RFP explicitly? A. Yes. P 20 And P 16 3.2.5.5 And 3.2.2.1 Q. The RFP mentions integration to systems such as “Wendia”, “mWorks”, and other integrations: a. Can we assume that the of work in this regard is limited to explaining how the system handles integration or is integration with other systems (e.g. ERM, BPM, etc.) within the scope of this project? b. If so, which systems and what level of integration is anticipated and can you please provide the API (web services, object interface, etc.) information as provided by the software vendor? A. See the answers to questions 1 and 60 in Addendum 1 of this RFP. Actual integration of the solution with MWorks and the other existing application using FileNet is part of the scope of the project. For the other existing systems and products mentioned, the State is interested in knowing how your solution would integrate with those products, but the actual integration is not included in the scope of this product. Q. Is Active Directory properly configured with the fields, users, groups, permissions and roles anticipated to be used in the solution? A. Not yet.