4.4.1 Are contingency plans should be adequate proposals for managing a shortfall. There described, eg for alternative should be written stakeholder support for the plans where relevant. For sources of funding, if example, if the commissioners are covering the gap, is this cover clearly assumptions turn out to be shown, including amount and timing? Is there evidence that the wrong or insufficient? Is there commissioners understand what the organisation is doing? flexibility to fund any additional revenue requirements or to absorb any affordability gap? Are there any contingent liabilities? 4.4.2 Have the assumptions underlying the financial appraisal (including cost of risk mitigation) been analysed for their robustness?
4.4.1 Are contingency plans described, eg for alternative sources of funding, if assumptions turn out to be wrong or insufficient? Is there flexibility to fund any additional revenue requirements or to absorb any affordability gap? Are there any contingent liabilities? should be adequate proposals for managing a shortfall. There should be written stakeholder support for the plans where relevant. For example, if the commissioners are covering the gap, is this cover clearly shown, including amount and timing? Is there evidence that the commissioners understand what the organisation is doing? 4.4.2 Have the assumptions underlying the financial appraisal (including cost of risk mitigation) been analysed for their robustness?