7.1.2 Effectiveness of grass Grass roots organization meeting 5 For >75% of neighborhoods, Grass roots organizations defined as above. – roots network frequency and attendance. one meeting per month, all personnel roles staffed and 10x formal role-holder numbers in regular attendance. 4 For 50-75% of – neighborhoods, one meeting per quarter all roles staffed and 5 x – role-holder numbers in attendance. No meetings in the rest. 3 For 25-50% of – neighborhoods, semi-annual meetings, but with some gaps in roles and less than 3x in attendance. No meetings in the rest. 2 For 25-50% of – neighborhoods, annual meetings but with significant gaps in roles and less than 3x formal in attendance. No meetings in the rest. 1 Ad hoc meetings in less than – 25% of neighborhoods of a few “enthusiasts”. 0 - No meetings. Clear identification and 5 For >75% of neighborhoods, One key is ensuring that there is a clear – coordination of pre and roles are defined and filled, differentiation of roles between grass-roots roles for grass-roots coordination is effective within organizations and between them and other bodies, supported by training. and between grass-roots bodies, entities such as city government who is – responsible for what?
7.1.2 Effectiveness of grass roots network Grass roots organization meeting frequency and attendance. 5 – For >75% of neighborhoods, one meeting per month, all personnel roles staffed and 10x formal role-holder numbers in regular attendance. 4 – For 50-75% of neighborhoods, one meeting per quarter – all roles staffed and 5 x role-holder numbers in attendance. No meetings in the rest. 3 – For 25-50% of neighborhoods, semi-annual meetings, but with some gaps in roles and less than 3x in attendance. No meetings in the rest. 2 – For 25-50% of neighborhoods, annual meetings but with significant gaps in roles and less than 3x formal in attendance. No meetings in the rest. 1 – Ad hoc meetings in less than 25% of neighborhoods of a few “enthusiasts”. 0 - No meetings. Grass roots organizations defined as above. Clear identification and coordination of pre and roles for grass-roots bodies, supported by training. 5 – For >75% of neighborhoods, roles are defined and filled, coordination is effective within and between grass-roots bodies, One key is ensuring that there is a clear differentiation of roles between grass-roots organizations and between them and other entities such as city government – who is responsible for what?