2. Checked: Data entered by the user is checked for errors and the user is provided an opportunity to correct them. 3. Confirmed: A mechanism is available for reviewing, confirming, and correcting information before finalizing the submission. Principle 4: Robust Content must be robust enough that it can be interpreted reliably by a wide variety of user agents, including assistive technologies. Guideline 4.1 Compatible Maximize compatibility with current and future user agents, including assistive technologies. Criteria Supporting Feature Remarks and Explanations 4.1.1 Parsing: In content Supported implemented using markup languages, elements have complete start and end tags, elements are nested according to their specifications, elements do not contain duplicate attributes, and any IDs are unique, except where the specifications allow these features. 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value: For all Supported With Exceptions - Assistive technologies can access user interface components equations and provide descriptive (including but not limited to: form text output, but may omit some elements, links and components information about equation font generated by scripts), the name and formatting or the existence of role can be programmatically comments. Some advanced features determined; states, properties, and of AT may be impacted while values that can be set by the user accessing equations, such as can be programmatically set; and verbosity controls or output to notification of changes to these Braille. items is available to user agents, - OneNote does not announce the including assistive technologies. presence of decorative page backgrounds (e.g. coloured pages or rule lines) to assistive technologies. - OneNote announces the presence of ink annotations on a page to assistive technologies, but does not expose specific information regarding the form or location of the ink annotations.
2. Checked: Data entered by the user is checked for errors and the user is provided an opportunity to correct them. 3. Confirmed: A mechanism is available for reviewing, confirming, and correcting information before finalizing the submission. Principle 4: Robust Content must be robust enough that it can be interpreted reliably by a wide variety of user agents, including assistive technologies. Guideline 4.1 Compatible Maximize compatibility with current and future user agents, including assistive technologies. Criteria Supporting Feature Remarks and Explanations 4.1.1 Parsing: In content implemented using markup languages, elements have complete start and end tags, elements are nested according to their specifications, elements do not contain duplicate attributes, and any IDs are unique, except where the specifications allow these features. Supported 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value: For all user interface components (including but not limited to: form elements, links and components generated by scripts), the name and role can be programmatically determined; states, properties, and values that can be set by the user can be programmatically set; and notification of changes to these items is available to user agents, including assistive technologies. Supported With Exceptions - Assistive technologies can access equations and provide descriptive text output, but may omit some information about equation font formatting or the existence of comments. Some advanced features of AT may be impacted while accessing equations, such as verbosity controls or output to Braille. - OneNote does not announce the presence of decorative page backgrounds (e.g. coloured pages or rule lines) to assistive technologies. - OneNote announces the presence of ink annotations on a page to assistive technologies, but does not expose specific information regarding the form or location of the ink annotations.