2.3: Gakkum Annually Project Manager/ Official Assumptions: Political - Annual number of joined up information system M&E officer announcements support is sustained for transnational counter-IWT Coordinator IP reporting on international collaboration operations- transnational IWT with key countries - Annual number of seizures as a operations and result of transnational seizures; Risks: Language, operations Gakkum/MOEF annual communication and cultural reports barriers inhibit transnational joint operations Project Outcome 3 3.1: Enforcement effectiveness PortMATE Annually Project Manager/ PortMATE assessment Assumptions: Improved at 5 key trade ports (Jakarta, assessments at M&E officer reports Statistics reflect an increase enforcement Surabaya, Bitung, Belawan and demo ports Coordinator IP in enforcement strategy Kualanamu airport), indicated effectiveness and not simply demonstrated and by: improved monitoring and scaled up at key - Annual PortMATE assessment reporting trade ports and tool scores (average score for connected KSDA, Customs, Port Risks: Lack of interest in subnational regions Management Authority at each participating in annual with key ecosystems port) PortMATE assessments 3.2: Effective enforcement of Consultations with Annually Project Manager/ Official Assumptions: Assessments two subnational regions known regional Gakkum M&E officer announcements on are carried out consistently to include significant wildlife staff and other key Coordinator IP IWT seizures, between years and sites trade routes, measured by: project investigations and - annual number of IWT seizures stakeholders prosecutions; project Risks: Lack of interest in at the project sites including INP, reports; WCS-WCU collaboration by agencies - annual number of IWT Customs, WCS; database other than IP investigations leading to arrests WCS-WCU database at the project sites; - annual number of successful IWT prosecutions at the project sites
2.3: - Annual number of joined up transnational counter-IWT operations- - Annual number of seizures as a result of transnational operations Gakkum information system Annually Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP Official announcements reporting on transnational IWT operations and seizures; Gakkum/MOEF annual reports Assumptions: Political support is sustained for international collaboration with key countries Risks: Language, communication and cultural barriers inhibit transnational joint operations Project Outcome 3 Improved enforcement strategy demonstrated and scaled up at key trade ports and connected subnational regions with key ecosystems 3.1: Enforcement effectiveness at 5 key trade ports (Jakarta, Surabaya, Bitung, Belawan and Kualanamu airport), indicated by: - Annual PortMATE assessment tool scores (average score for KSDA, Customs, Port Management Authority at each port) PortMATE assessments at demo ports Annually Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP PortMATE assessment reports Assumptions: Statistics reflect an increase in enforcement effectiveness and not simply improved monitoring and reporting Risks: Lack of interest in participating in annual PortMATE assessments 3.2: Effective enforcement of two subnational regions known to include significant wildlife trade routes, measured by: - annual number of IWT seizures at the project sites - annual number of IWT investigations leading to arrests at the project sites; - annual number of successful IWT prosecutions at the project sites Consultations with regional Gakkum staff and other key project stakeholders including INP, Customs, WCS; WCS-WCU database Annually Project Manager/ M&E officer Coordinator IP Official announcements on IWT seizures, investigations and prosecutions; project reports; WCS-WCU database Assumptions: Assessments are carried out consistently between years and sites Risks: Lack of interest in collaboration by agencies other than IP