formally developed but is approved and incomplete adopted by and/or not government, formally potentially approved or integrated into adopted by other land use government. strategy/action plan(s). 3.1.3 Developed Consultations Some No 1 Guidance (please delete): Provide a reference for the analysis of were held with consultations consultations stakeholder groups used for the rating and evidence of stakeholder through a all groups of were held on were held with groups that were invited to and participated in consultations. participatory stakeholders in some stakeholders on Evidence that stakeholder input influenced the strategy and action process the jurisdiction but were not mapping and plan may include a written statement or minutes of a meeting (including all comprehensive, prioritization of explaining of how stakeholder input was taken into account or levels and and/or not biodiversity and other relevant documentation. relevant documented, ecosystem departments of and/or the services or on government, strategy, plan the relevant private and map were strategy/action sector not validated by plan. organizations, stakeholders large and small and/or not producers, meeting all other NGOs, local conditions for A. communities and indigenous peoples where present) on mapping and prioritization of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and on the strategy and action plan. Comments have been published with evidence they influenced the strategy, plan and map were
formally approved and adopted by government, potentially integrated into other land use strategy/action plan(s). developed but is incomplete and/or not formally approved or adopted by government. 3.1.3 Developed through a participatory process Consultations were held with all groups of stakeholders in the jurisdiction (including all levels and relevant departments of government, relevant private sector organizations, large and small producers, NGOs, local communities and indigenous peoples where present) on mapping and prioritization of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and on the strategy and action plan. Comments have been published with evidence they influenced the strategy, plan and map were Some consultations were held on some but were not comprehensive, and/or not documented, and/or the strategy, plan and map were not validated by stakeholders and/or not meeting all other conditions for A. No consultations were held with stakeholders on mapping and prioritization of biodiversity and ecosystem services or on the strategy/action plan. 1 Guidance (please delete): Provide a reference for the analysis of stakeholder groups used for the rating and evidence of stakeholder groups that were invited to and participated in consultations. Evidence that stakeholder input influenced the strategy and action plan may include a written statement or minutes of a meeting explaining of how stakeholder input was taken into account or other relevant documentation.