the teacher. Note that no changes can be made to the Student Learning Objectives during the instructional period, only the implementation plan. At the end of the instructional period, teachers will administer the post-assessments and will compile their class/group data. By April 15, each teacher is responsible for assessing the students’ growth toward the Student Learning Objectives. By May 1st, teachers must submit to their evaluator their pre-assessment, post-assessment, and growth results for each student. Students must be enrolled in a course for at least 65% of the instructional period, and have both a pre and post assessment score in order for the data to be included in the Student Learning student’s Objectives measures. Students who enroll after the pre-assessment administration must be given an opportunity to take the pre-assessment if they will be enrolled at least 65% of the instructional period for that course. Evaluators will review the pre-assessment and post-assessment data presented by each teacher to make a determination as to whether the Student Learning Objectives were met. The evaluator will assign an end-of-year rating using the evaluation rubric with the following levels: Exemplary, and as shown in Figure 10. Proficient, Needs Development Ineffective (Normal mathematical rules for Figure 10: Student Learning Objectives Evaluation Rubric rounding should apply so that >.5 rounds up.) Exemplary Proficient Needs Development Ineffective The work of the teacher The work of the teacher The work of the teacher The work of the teacher does results in extraordinary results in acceptable, results in student academic not result in acceptable student academic growth measurable, and appropriate growth that does not meet the student academic growth. beyond expectations during established standard and/or is student academic growth. the school year. not achieved with all populations taught by the Greater than 50% of students teacher. exceeded the Student Greater than 80% of students Fewer than 50% of students Learning Objectives, at least met or exceeded the Student Greater than 50% of students 40% met the Student Learning Objectives and no met or exceeded the Student met or exceed the Student Learning Objectives, and no more than 20% did not meet Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives. more than 10% did not meet the Student Learning Objectives. the Student Learning Objectives. Comments:
the teacher. Note that no changes can be made to the Student Learning Objectives during the instructional period, only the implementation plan. At the end of the instructional period, teachers will administer the post-assessments and will compile their class/group data. By April 15, each teacher is responsible for assessing the students’ growth toward the Student Learning Objectives. By May 1st, teachers must submit to their evaluator their pre-assessment, post-assessment, and growth results for each student. Students must be enrolled in a course for at least 65% of the instructional period, and have both a pre and post assessment score in order for the student’s data to be included in the Student Learning Objectives measures. Students who enroll after the pre-assessment administration must be given an opportunity to take the pre-assessment if they will be enrolled at least 65% of the instructional period for that course. Evaluators will review the pre-assessment and post-assessment data presented by each teacher to make a determination as to whether the Student Learning Objectives were met. The evaluator will assign an end-of-year rating using the evaluation rubric with the following levels: Exemplary, Proficient, Needs Development and Ineffective as shown in Figure 10. Figure 10: Student Learning Objectives Evaluation Rubric (Normal mathematical rules for rounding should apply so that >.5 rounds up.) Exemplary Proficient Needs Development Ineffective The work of the teacher results in extraordinary student academic growth beyond expectations during the school year. Greater than 50% of students exceeded the Student Learning Objectives, at least 40% met the Student Learning Objectives, and no more than 10% did not meet the Student Learning Objectives. The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic growth. Greater than 80% of students met or exceeded the Student Learning Objectives and no more than 20% did not meet the Student Learning Objectives. The work of the teacher results in student academic growth that does not meet the established standard and/or is not achieved with all populations taught by the teacher. Greater than 50% of students met or exceeded the Student Learning Objectives. The work of the teacher does not result in acceptable student academic growth. Fewer than 50% of students met or exceed the Student Learning Objectives. Comments: