Misinterprets or does not understand the literature (if applicable) Critical Thought and Demonstrates mature critical Demonstrates appropriate Demonstrates limited critical Lacks careful thought. Argument thinking. level of critical thinking. thinking. Has a weak, inconsistent, The methods and techniques Uses existing methods, Uses existing methods, self-contradictory, to be used are clearly and techniques, or approaches in techniques, or approaches in unconvincing, and/or invalid fully described and justified correct manner. somewhat accurate ways. argument. per purpose and research/evaluation questions Limitations of the design are Limitations of the design are not Methods and techniques to explored adequately. explored with any breadth or be used are not adequately Limitations of the design are depth. described or justified. explored at length. Sustains an argument appropriately and is Sustains an argument, but the Discussion of the Argument is focused, logical, convincing. argument is not imaginative, limitations of the design is rigorous, and sustained. complex, or convincing incomplete, inappropriate, or erroneous Presentation of Findings Results are appropriately Results are somewhat Results are not appropriately Results are not presented to presented to both audience appropriately presented to presented to the particular the particular audience or and according to professional either the audience or audience or according to the according to professional scholarly standards. according to professional professional scholarly scholarly practitioner scholarly practitioner standards. standards. Presentation of results is standards but not both. organized and transitions in a Presentation of results is not Presentation of results is meaningful narrative. Presentation of results is organized in a meaningful missing. somewhat organized in that narrative that transitions The selection of results the narrative progresses in a smoothly. Results are missing. presented may be considered meaningful way. Tables and figures are as the most salient to the Results presented without neither provided nor study. There is a selective reference to what may be sufficiently explained in text. presentation of results that considered most relevant to that Tables and figures are are salient but still not particular study. Tables and figures are used provided and used to selecting the most salient. to replace explanation of supplement explanations in Tables and figures are neither results rather than text. Tables and figures are provided nor sufficiently supplement. provided yet not explained in explained in text. detail
Misinterprets or does not understand the literature (if applicable) Critical Thought and Argument Demonstrates mature critical thinking. The methods and techniques to be used are clearly and fully described and justified per purpose and research/evaluation questions Limitations of the design are explored at length. Argument is focused, logical, rigorous, and sustained. Demonstrates appropriate level of critical thinking. Uses existing methods, techniques, or approaches in correct manner. Limitations of the design are explored adequately. Sustains an argument appropriately and is convincing. Demonstrates limited critical thinking. Uses existing methods, techniques, or approaches in somewhat accurate ways. Limitations of the design are not explored with any breadth or depth. Sustains an argument, but the argument is not imaginative, complex, or convincing Lacks careful thought. Has a weak, inconsistent, self-contradictory, unconvincing, and/or invalid argument. Methods and techniques to be used are not adequately described or justified. Discussion of the limitations of the design is incomplete, inappropriate, or erroneous Presentation of Findings Results are appropriately presented to both audience and according to professional scholarly standards. Presentation of results is organized and transitions in a meaningful narrative. The selection of results presented may be considered as the most salient to the study. Tables and figures are provided and used to supplement explanations in text. Results are somewhat appropriately presented to either the audience or according to professional scholarly practitioner standards but not both. Presentation of results is somewhat organized in that the narrative progresses in a meaningful way. There is a selective presentation of results that are salient but still not selecting the most salient. Tables and figures are provided yet not explained in detail Results are not appropriately presented to the particular audience or according to the professional scholarly standards. Presentation of results is not organized in a meaningful narrative that transitions smoothly. Results presented without reference to what may be considered most relevant to that particular study. Tables and figures are neither provided nor sufficiently explained in text. Results are not presented to the particular audience or according to professional scholarly practitioner standards. Presentation of results is missing. Results are missing. Tables and figures are neither provided nor sufficiently explained in text. Tables and figures are used to replace explanation of results rather than supplement.