intervenor compensation. Showing of customer or customer-related status (§ 1802(b)): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding R.12-06-013 Verified. number: 6. Date of ALJ ruling: February 25, 2013 Verified. 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer or customer-related status? Yes, IREC demonstrated appropriate status as a customer. Showing of financial hardship” (§ 1802(g)): “significant 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.12-06-013 Verified. 10. Date of ALJ ruling: February 25, 2013 Verified. 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): See Notes 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes, IREC demonstrated significant financial hardship. Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.15-07-001 Verified. 14. Date of issuance of Order or Decision: July 13, 2015 Verified. 15. File date of compensation request: June 29, 2016 Verified. 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes, IREC timely filed the request for compensation. Additional Comments on Part I (use line reference # as appropriate): # Intervenor’s Comment(s) CPUC Discussion 15 IREC has continued to monitor R.12-06-013, but has Agreed. IREC timely filed the chosen to not participate further and will not be filing request for compensation. a request for any other Decision issued in this docket. IREC’s decision to delay filing this request was, in part, due to the pendency of the Commission’s decision in Docket 14-07-002 (NEM 2.0). Consistent with its arguments in this case, IREC expected that the Commission might preserve a two-tier inverted block
intervenor compensation. Showing of customer or customer-related status (§ 1802(b)): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.12-06-013 Verified. 6. Date of ALJ ruling: February 25, 2013 Verified. 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer or customer-related status? Yes, IREC demonstrated appropriate status as a customer. Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§ 1802(g)): 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.12-06-013 Verified. 10. Date of ALJ ruling: February 25, 2013 Verified. 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): See Notes 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes, IREC demonstrated significant financial hardship. Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.15-07-001 Verified. 14. Date of issuance of Order or Decision: July 13, 2015 Verified. 15. File date of compensation request: June 29, 2016 Verified. 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes, IREC timely filed the request for compensation. Additional Comments on Part I (use line reference # as appropriate): # Intervenor’s Comment(s) CPUC Discussion 15 IREC has continued to monitor R.12-06-013, but has chosen to not participate further and will not be filing a request for any other Decision issued in this docket. IREC’s decision to delay filing this request was, in part, due to the pendency of the Commission’s decision in Docket 14-07-002 (NEM 2.0). Consistent with its arguments in this case, IREC expected that the Commission might preserve a two-tier inverted block Agreed. IREC timely filed the request for compensation.