education rights holders and other foster youth stakeholders, English learner parents, community organizations representing English learners, and others as appropriate) been engaged and involved in developing, reviewing, and supporting implementation of the LCAP? How have stakeholders been included in the LEA’s process in a timely manner to allow for engagement in the development of the LCAP? What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was made available to stakeholders related to the state priorities and used by the LEA to inform the LCAP goal setting process? What changes, if any, were made in the LCAP prior to adoption as a result of written comments or other feedback received by the LEA through any of the LEA’s engagement processes? What specific actions were taken to meet statutory requirements for stakeholder engagement pursuant to Education Code sections 52062, 52068, and 47606.5, including engagement with representative parents of pupils identified in Education Code section 42238.01? In the annual update, how has the involvement of these stakeholders supported improved outcomes for pupils related to the state priorities? Involvement Process Impact on LCAP I. FOSTER YOUTH STAKEHOLDERS: A: Comments/feedback received: B: Changes made in LCAP: County child welfare agency: [contact persons, dates, how involved] County office of education foster youth services program: [contact persons, dates, how involved] Court-appointed special advocates (CASA) and volunteer education rights holders: [contact persons, dates, how involved] Foster youth organizations (CYC, Foster Club, etc.) and individual foster youth: [contact persons, dates, how involved] Foster parent and kinship care organizations (FFAs, Grandparents as Parents, Community Coalition, etc.): [contact persons, dates, how involved] Other foster care stakeholders, including minors’ counsel: [contact persons, dates, how involved] County Office of Education Foster Youth Services local advisory group II. PARENT ADVISORY COMMITTEES: Foster youth stakeholders were represented on parent advisory committees as follows: Parents were trained as to the unique educational challenges facing foster youth as follows:
education rights holders and other foster youth stakeholders, English learner parents, community organizations representing English learners, and others as appropriate) been engaged and involved in developing, reviewing, and supporting implementation of the LCAP? How have stakeholders been included in the LEA’s process in a timely manner to allow for engagement in the development of the LCAP? What information (e.g., quantitative and qualitative data/metrics) was made available to stakeholders related to the state priorities and used by the LEA to inform the LCAP goal setting process? What changes, if any, were made in the LCAP prior to adoption as a result of written comments or other feedback received by the LEA through any of the LEA’s engagement processes? What specific actions were taken to meet statutory requirements for stakeholder engagement pursuant to Education Code sections 52062, 52068, and 47606.5, including engagement with representative parents of pupils identified in Education Code section 42238.01? In the annual update, how has the involvement of these stakeholders supported improved outcomes for pupils related to the state priorities? Involvement Process Impact on LCAP I. FOSTER YOUTH STAKEHOLDERS: County child welfare agency: [contact persons, dates, how involved] County office of education foster youth services program: [contact persons, dates, how involved] Court-appointed special advocates (CASA) and volunteer education rights holders: [contact persons, dates, how involved] Foster youth organizations (CYC, Foster Club, etc.) and individual foster youth: [contact persons, dates, how involved] Foster parent and kinship care organizations (FFAs, Grandparents as Parents, Community Coalition, etc.): [contact persons, dates, how involved] Other foster care stakeholders, including minors’ counsel: [contact persons, dates, how involved] County Office of Education Foster Youth Services local advisory group II. PARENT ADVISORY COMMITTEES: Foster youth stakeholders were represented on parent advisory committees as follows: Parents were trained as to the unique educational challenges facing foster youth as follows: A: Comments/feedback received: B: Changes made in LCAP: