Marking Scheme Competitor No Competitor Name Date Competition Fine Jewellery Making Venue Mark Aspect of Criterion Description – Aspect ID Max Mark Awarded Judges’ Score 1 Similarity to drawing how closely the 10 – piece reflects the given design in overall shape and feel 2 Sawing ajour work the quality of all 10 – – piercing out and opening of stone holes including front and back holes 3 Soldering the quality and consistency 10 – of all soldering, marks will be lost where too much or too little solder has been used and lack of consistency in appearance 4 Surface finish quality of surface finish 5 – using up to a minimum of 800 grade emery paper 5 Dimensions marks will be awarded for 10 – accuracy and the ability to make to the given dimensions within a given tolerance (+ or 0.2 mm) – 6 Completion on time Marks will be 5 – awarded for completing the project within the given time TOTAL 50
Marking Scheme Competitor No Competitor Name Date Competition Fine Jewellery Making Venue Aspect ID Aspect of Criterion – Description Max Mark Judges’ Score Mark Awarded 1 Similarity to drawing – how closely the piece reflects the given design in overall shape and feel 10 2 Sawing – ajour work – the quality of all piercing out and opening of stone holes including front and back holes 10 3 Soldering – the quality and consistency of all soldering, marks will be lost where too much or too little solder has been used and lack of consistency in appearance 10 4 Surface finish – quality of surface finish using up to a minimum of 800 grade emery paper 5 5 Dimensions – marks will be awarded for accuracy and the ability to make to the given dimensions within a given tolerance (+ or – 0.2 mm) 10 6 Completion on time – Marks will be awarded for completing the project within the given time 5 TOTAL 50