4. Was the NOI timely filed? Yes, due to later pre-hearing conference. Showing of customer or customer-related status (§ 1802(b)): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding R.14-07-002 Verified number: 6. Date of ALJ ruling: December 18, 2014 Verified 7. Based on another CPUC determination n/a (specify): 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer or customer-related status? Yes Showing of (§ 1802(g)): “significant financial hardship” 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding R.14-07-002 Verified number: 10. Date of ALJ ruling: December 18, 2014 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination n/a (specify): 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.17-05-014 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: May 15, 2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: June 28, 2017 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Specific References to CPUC Discussion Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Claimed Claimed Contribution(s) Contribution(s) Verified (A) Develop guidance The decision specifies that the economic feasibility of each identified option in this on economic feasibility and proceeding will be evaluated based on: implementation of Direct financial and energy specific costs potential energy and benefits of the individual program, options including the implementation costs of the
4. Was the NOI timely filed? Yes, due to later pre-hearing conference. Showing of customer or customer-related status (§ 1802(b)): 5. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-07-002 Verified 6. Date of ALJ ruling: December 18, 2014 Verified 7. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): n/a 8. Has the Intervenor demonstrated customer or customer-related status? Yes Showing of “significant financial hardship” (§ 1802(g)): 9. Based on ALJ ruling issued in proceeding number: R.14-07-002 Verified 10. Date of ALJ ruling: December 18, 2014 Verified 11. Based on another CPUC determination (specify): n/a 12. 12. Has the Intervenor demonstrated significant financial hardship? Yes Timely request for compensation (§ 1804(c)): 13. Identify Final Decision: D.17-05-014 Verified 14. Date of issuance of Final Order or Decision: May 15, 2017 Verified 15. File date of compensation request: June 28, 2017 Verified 16. Was the request for compensation timely? Yes II: SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION Did the Intervenor substantially contribute to the final decision (see § 1802(i), § 1803(a), and D.98-04-059). Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) Specific References to Intervenor’s Claimed Contribution(s) CPUC Discussion (A) Develop guidance on economic feasibility and implementation of potential energy options The decision specifies that the economic feasibility of each identified option in this proceeding will be evaluated based on: Direct financial and energy specific costs and benefits of the individual program, including the implementation costs of the Verified