5.2 Policies and Policies and procedures for sub-award Policies and procedures for sub-award Policies and procedures for sub-award procedures for management are management are management are Management management are Weak and require significant Adequate, but may require some Good changes updating Not written Consistently applied Not usually applied Usually applied Written, but The organization has (NUPAS 3.2) inadequate and The organization has The organization has require Substantial experience providing substantial Limited experience providing sub-awards Significant experience providing changes Consistently oriented Not followed Not adequately oriented on their responsibilities Adequately oriented sub-awardees on on their responsibilities responsibilities Provided good technical and The organization financial oversight to has Not usually provided adequate Provided adequate technical and including regularly technical and financial oversight to financial oversight to sub-awardees, scheduled and documented Not provided sub-awardees, including regularly including regularly scheduled and supervisory visits formal scheduled and documented documented supervisory visits supervisory visits Consistently ensured that Usually ensured that sub-awardees submit regular financial Not usually ensured that submit regular financial and progress No and progress reports submit regular financial reports requirements and progress reports for competition, Consistently provided adequate transparency, Usually provided adequate and timely and timely feedback on reports to Not provided adequate and timely and ethical feedback on reports to sub-awardees sub-awardees feedback on reports to behavior of sub-awardees Adequate requirements for Good requirements for competition, transparency, and ethical competition, transparency, and Inadequate requirements for behavior of sub-awardees ethical behavior of awardees competition, transparency, and ethical behavior of sub-awardees Sub-Award Management Notes 1. Does the organization have much experience providing sub-grants and sub-contracts? 2. How is the organization viewed by its sub-awardees? 3. What challenges have occurred in applying donor rules and regulations for sub-awards? How have the challenges been addressed? 4. Describe how the organization manages and monitors sub-awards. 5. Has the organization consistently provided good technical and financial oversight to the sub-awardees, including regularly scheduled supervisory visits to sub-awardees? Is the oversight documented?
5.2 Management (NUPAS 3.2) Policies and procedures for management are Not written Written, but inadequate and require substantial changes Not followed The organization has Not provided formal No requirements for competition, transparency, and ethical behavior of sub-awardees Policies and procedures for sub-award management are Weak and require significant changes Not usually applied The organization has Limited experience providing Not adequately oriented on their responsibilities Not usually provided adequate technical and financial oversight to sub-awardees, including regularly scheduled and documented supervisory visits Not usually ensured that submit regular financial and progress reports Not provided adequate and timely feedback on reports to Inadequate requirements for competition, transparency, and ethical behavior of sub-awardees Policies and procedures for sub-award management are Adequate, but may require some updating Usually applied The organization has Significant experience providing Adequately oriented sub-awardees on responsibilities Provided adequate technical and financial oversight to sub-awardees, including regularly scheduled and documented supervisory visits Usually ensured that sub-awardees submit regular financial and progress reports Usually provided adequate and timely feedback on reports to sub-awardees Adequate requirements for competition, transparency, and ethical behavior of sub-awardees Policies and procedures for sub-award management are Good Consistently applied The organization has Substantial experience providing sub-awards Consistently oriented on their responsibilities Provided good technical and financial oversight to including regularly scheduled and documented supervisory visits Consistently ensured that submit regular financial and progress reports Consistently provided adequate and timely feedback on reports to sub-awardees Good requirements for competition, transparency, and ethical behavior of awardees Sub-Award Management Notes 1. Does the organization have much experience providing sub-grants and sub-contracts? 2. How is the organization viewed by its sub-awardees? 3. What challenges have occurred in applying donor rules and regulations for sub-awards? How have the challenges been addressed? 4. Describe how the organization manages and monitors sub-awards. 5. Has the organization consistently provided good technical and financial oversight to the sub-awardees, including regularly scheduled supervisory visits to sub-awardees? Is the oversight documented?