Table 3 continued Gender role Measure / Coping Stressful Scoring Measure Author Population Situation Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics procedure (Dependent investigated (Independent Variable) Variable) Spangenberg First-year None BSRI / CI Mann-Whitney U Females & Lategan students specified Median-split tests * (1993) Andr. females had higher adaptive coping scores compared to: masc. = 41, < .05 n p fem. = 67, < .001 n p und. = 76, < .001 n p Males Und. reported less adaptive coping compared: andr. = 10, < .001 n p masc. = 31, < .001 n p Both males and females Andr. and masc. individuals coped more flexibly with the self compared to: fem. und. = 68, < .001 n p Andr. individuals coped more flexible with = 88, < .001 n p the environment compared to: masc. < .05 p fem. < .001 p und. < .001 p * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated, Note.
Table 3 continued Author Population Stressful Situation investigated Gender role Measure / Scoring procedure (Independent Variable) Coping Measure (Dependent Variable) Statistical Analysis Key findings Statistics Spangenberg & Lategan (1993) First-year students None specified BSRI / Median-split CI Mann-Whitney U tests Females Andr. females had higher adaptive coping scores compared to: masc. fem. und. Males Und. reported less adaptive coping compared: andr. masc. Both males and females Andr. and masc. individuals coped more flexibly with the self compared to: fem. und. Andr. individuals coped more flexible with the environment compared to: masc. fem. und. * n = 41, p < .05 n = 67, p < .001 n = 76, p < .001 n = 10, p < .001 n = 31, p < .001 n = 68, p < .001 n = 88, p < .001 p < .05 p < .001 p < .001 Note. * indicates full statistics not reported in the study. Andr. = Androgynous, Masc. = Masculine, Fem. = Feminine, Und. = Undifferentiated,