Id Description of Risk Impact on Change Date of Mitigation Actions Responsibility Cost Timeline Work (including any Project Review (Preventative or for mitigation for Breakdown Structure identified (Identify Contingency) action(s) mitigation ‘triggers’) of of consequences ) action(s) and (combined Grade Assessment Likelihood Assessment Seriousness Seriousness) Likelihood <n> <A <Describe the <Change <Date of <Specify planned <Specify who <Specify This is to “newspaper nature of the in Grade last mitigation is responsible timeframe indicate headline” style statement. Also risk and the since last review> strategies: for for that the identify relevant impact on the review> undertaking mitigation identified Preventative triggers that may project if the risk each action(s) mitigation (implement cause the risk to is not mitigated mitigation to be action has immediately) be realised.> or managed> action(s)> complete been Contingency by> included in (implement the WBS if/when risk (workplan). occurs).> 1 Steering Lack of H H A NEW 15/02/06 Preventative: Project NA 15/03/06 Y Committee availability will Manager Highlight unavailable. stall progress strategic Identified triggers: (ie. delayed connection - decisions will Steering link Project defer output Committee Objective to finalisation, meetings relevant extend project repeatedly Agency timelines and rescheduled strategic staff resources due to lack of objectives will be required availability; Confirm 2006 for longer than Members do meeting anticipated) not attend schedule in despite prior January confirmation Confirm SC of attendance. membership Widen representation (include other Agencies)
Id Description of Risk (including any identified ‘triggers’) Impact on Project (Identify consequences ) Assessment of Likelihood Assessment of Seriousness Grade (combined Likelihood and Seriousness) Change Date of Review Mitigation Actions (Preventative or Contingency) Responsibility for mitigation action(s) Cost Timeline for mitigation action(s) Work Breakdown Structure <n> <A “newspaper headline” style statement. Also identify relevant triggers that may cause the risk to be realised.> <Describe the nature of the risk and the impact on the project if the risk is not mitigated or managed> <Change in Grade since last review> <Date of last review> <Specify planned mitigation strategies: Preventative (implement immediately) Contingency (implement if/when risk occurs).> <Specify who is responsible for undertaking each mitigation action(s)> <Specify timeframe for mitigation action(s) to be by> This is to indicate that the identified mitigation action has been included in the WBS (workplan). 1 Steering Committee unavailable. Identified triggers: Steering Committee meetings repeatedly rescheduled due to lack of availability; Members do not attend despite prior confirmation of attendance. Lack of availability will stall progress (ie. delayed decisions will defer output finalisation, extend project timelines and staff resources will be required for longer than anticipated) H H A NEW 15/02/06 Preventative: Highlight strategic connection - link Project Objective to relevant Agency strategic objectives Confirm 2006 meeting schedule in January Confirm SC membership Widen representation (include other Agencies) Project Manager NA 15/03/06 Y complete