Austrian 0.1317 Economics (-1.10) Journal of Interdisciplinary 44 53 58 57 Interdisciplinary 0.1287 Economics 51 (-1.13) International Interdisciplinary 59 57 59 58 Journal of Green 0.1229 Economics 38 (-1.19) Intervention: General 55 62 39 European Journal of Economics 59 and Economic 0.1171 Policy 59 (-1.26) Review of Black General 60 59 52 60 Political 0.1091 Economy 52 (-1.35) Critical Interdisciplinary 58 61 61 Perspectives on 61 International 0.0928 Business 56 (-1.52) Interdisciplinary 62 60 62 62 0.0873 Debatte 44 (-1.59) Derived from Appendix I: Table 5A Research Quality-Equality Ranking of Heterodox and Mainstream Journals Methodology and Data Economics is about explaining the provisioning process. Even though heterodox and mainstream economics contest each of it, they both adhere to the other’s explanation discipline’s goal of producing more scientific knowledge about it. Thus, the research quality of a journal is broadly the same for both—the usefulness of its articles to researchers in their analysis of the provisioning process. What constitutes advancement in scientific knowledge for heterodox and
Austrian Economics 0.1317 (-1.10) Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics Interdisciplinary 51 44 53 58 57 0.1287 (-1.13) International Journal of Green Economics Interdisciplinary 38 59 57 59 58 0.1229 (-1.19) Intervention: European Journal of Economics and Economic Policy General 59 55 62 39 59 0.1171 (-1.26) Review of Black Political Economy General 52 60 59 52 60 0.1091 (-1.35) Critical Perspectives on International Business Interdisciplinary 56 58 61 61 61 0.0928 (-1.52) Debatte Interdisciplinary 44 62 60 62 62 0.0873 (-1.59) Derived from Appendix I: Table 5A Research Quality-Equality Ranking of Heterodox and Mainstream Journals Methodology and Data Economics is about explaining the provisioning process. Even though heterodox and mainstream economics contest each other’s explanation of it, they both adhere to the discipline’s goal of producing more scientific knowledge about it. Thus, the research quality of a journal is broadly the same for both—the usefulness of its articles to researchers in their analysis of the provisioning process. What constitutes advancement in scientific knowledge for heterodox and