are all shit.” “They colours are very 70s/80s very old fashioned.” “The – logos should represent sex, intimacy, affection, the three logos presented don’t “The do this at all.” logos should not use too many words, lots of us can’t read. With the three “The proposed logos, you’d have to be able to read to know what it is about.” logo should speak to young people but also older generations so they know “The what this program is about and a logo that would stand the test of time.” the international symbol of disability somewhere in the logo would be good “Using because it is recognised globally.” alternative logo could be the disability symbol but instead of the wheel you have “An a circle with both the arrow and the cross (gender symbols) pointing in different directions.” away from gender symbols, don’t force this onto people. Gender Queer won’t “Stay fit into the cross and arrow (female and male) symbols.” people - not just about boys or girls.” “It’s people hugging in the logo.” “Show symbolising able-bodied people and people with disability that that “Something we’re different in the way that we think and feel similar but different symbols.” – may depend how the logo is to be used within the strategy. In developing “It countries they may have to rely on a static image. In advanced economies there may be more use of digital media to make the logo more interactive.” 1: Specific Feedback and Comments on Proposed LOGOS LOGO 1 LOGO 2 LOGO 3 Proposed LOGO 1 logo looks like an offensive representation of Dissociative Identity Disorder.” “This logo is shit.” “This don’t like it at all, we don’t have multiple heads!” “I colours are terrible.” “The Proposed LOGO 2
“They are all shit.” “The colours are very 70s/80s – very old fashioned.” “The logos should represent sex, intimacy, affection, the three logos presented don’t do this at all.” “The logos should not use too many words, lots of us can’t read. With the three proposed logos, you’d have to be able to read to know what it is about.” “The logo should speak to young people but also older generations so they know what this program is about and a logo that would stand the test of time.” “Using the international symbol of disability somewhere in the logo would be good because it is recognised globally.” “An alternative logo could be the disability symbol but instead of the wheel you have a circle with both the arrow and the cross (gender symbols) pointing in different directions.” “Stay away from gender symbols, don’t force this onto people. Gender Queer won’t fit into the cross and arrow (female and male) symbols.” “It’s people - not just about boys or girls.” “Show people hugging in the logo.” “Something symbolising able-bodied people and people with disability that that we’re different in the way that we think and feel – similar but different symbols.” “It may depend how the logo is to be used within the strategy. In developing countries they may have to rely on a static image. In advanced economies there may be more use of digital media to make the logo more interactive.” 1: Specific Feedback and Comments on Proposed LOGOS LOGO 1 LOGO 2 LOGO 3 Proposed LOGO 1 “This logo looks like an offensive representation of Dissociative Identity Disorder.” “This logo is shit.” “I don’t like it at all, we don’t have multiple heads!” “The colours are terrible.” Proposed LOGO 2