1. Location  See Exploration Information.  See Mineral Resource. Maps and cross sections and other  or three-dimensional  Particular attention should be given to  The location of samples and other drill-hole and other sample survey relevant features (property lines, mine representation of results should information including down-hole workings, etc.) should be well-known. exist, showing location of samples, drill holes, exploration surveys. pits, underground workings, If the sample locations are not well  geological data, etc. the effect on the resource When evaluating drill hole results, estimates should be considered.  consideration should be given to  The location of collars depth to top and bottom of should be accurate, and the adequacy mineralization, to total length and of the down-hole surveying technique grade of intercepts, and to the should be reviewed and commented accuracy of survey information on. including down-hole surveys. If more than one coordinate system is  in use on the project, the relationship between the systems needs to be established and verified. Changes in magnetic declination with  time should be accounted for and documented. Effects of vertical and horizontal components of the magnetic field and magnetic storms on magnetic declination at high latitudes should be considered. 2. Geology See Exploration Information. See Mineral Resource. Description of the nature and    reliability of geological Particular attention should be given to  information (rock types, structure, drill-hole logging and other sample information used in resource alteration, mineralization, and evaluation. relation to known mineralized zones, etc.). A description of the thoroughness  Description of the deposit type with which all significant lithologic,  and physical continuity of stratigraphic, structural, mineralogical, mineralization. alteration, or other geological or geotechnical characteristics were Description of drill-hole logging  recorded. and mapping procedures.
1. Location  Maps and cross sections and other or three-dimensional representation of results should exist, showing location of samples, drill holes, exploration pits, underground workings, geological data, etc.  When evaluating drill hole results, consideration should be given to depth to top and bottom of mineralization, to total length and grade of intercepts, and to the accuracy of survey information including down-hole surveys.  See Exploration Information.  Particular attention should be given to drill-hole and other sample survey information including down-hole surveys.  If the sample locations are not well the effect on the resource estimates should be considered.  The location of collars should be accurate, and the adequacy of the down-hole surveying technique should be reviewed and commented on.  If more than one coordinate system is in use on the project, the relationship between the systems needs to be established and verified.  Changes in magnetic declination with time should be accounted for and documented. Effects of vertical and horizontal components of the magnetic field and magnetic storms on magnetic declination at high latitudes should be considered.  See Mineral Resource.  The location of samples and other relevant features (property lines, mine workings, etc.) should be well-known. 2. Geology  Description of the nature and reliability of geological information (rock types, structure, alteration, mineralization, and relation to known mineralized zones, etc.).  Description of the deposit type and physical continuity of mineralization.  Description of drill-hole logging and mapping procedures.  See Exploration Information.  Particular attention should be given to drill-hole logging and other sample information used in resource evaluation.  A description of the thoroughness with which all significant lithologic, stratigraphic, structural, mineralogical, alteration, or other geological or geotechnical characteristics were recorded.  See Mineral Resource.