thoughts of losing his house and worry about his father. It was on 21 February 2008 that Mr Lee was transferred from the City Watch House to the Adelaide Remand Centre. At the Adelaide Remand Centre it was noted on that same day that Mr Lee denied any thoughts of self-harm. It does not appear that there was cause for any significant level of concern regarding Mr risk of self-harm whilst in custody. He did not attempt self-harm while in Lee’s custody. Mr home detention and death Lee’s As seen, Mr bail was subject to a condition that he obey the lawful directions of Lee’s any supervisor designated to supervise home detention. A supervisor was so designated. On the day of his release from custody, namely 29 February 2008, Mr Lee was met at the premises at , Hallet Cove by a home detention case manager of DCS by the name of Tamara Blythe. Ms Blythe provided a statement to the Inquest. On this occasion Mr Lee identified to Ms Blythe several issues in his life including problematic alcohol consumption, the difficulty that he was having in coming to terms with the charges alleged against him and the fact that he was now subject to home detention bail. The difficulty posed by the restrictive nature of home detention would be mentioned on other occasions by Mr Lee, but it will be remembered that the alternative for Mr Lee would have been a possibly lengthy and unattractive remand in custody. It will be noted that Mr Lee was not the subject of a court imposed Intervention Program pursuant to section 21B of the Bail Act 1985. The imposition of an Intervention Program can be made a condition of a bail. It is meant to person’s provide supervised treatment, supervised rehabilitation, supervised behaviour management or supervised access to support services, or a combination of those things, that are designed to address behavioural problems, substance abuse or mental impairment. Ms Blythe states that she discussed with Mr Lee his interest in being referred to Intervention through DCS. It appears that what Ms Blythe had in mind here was Mr possible participation in anger management, victim awareness and Lee’s alcohol and drug abuse related interventions. Mr Lee indicated that he would like to pursue Intervention. A referral to an Intervention worker at the Edwardstown Community Corrections Centre was later completed and an appointment was made
thoughts of losing his house and worry about his father. It was on 21 February 2008 that Mr Lee was transferred from the City Watch House to the Adelaide Remand Centre. At the Adelaide Remand Centre it was noted on that same day that Mr Lee denied any thoughts of self-harm. It does not appear that there was cause for any significant level of concern regarding Mr Lee’s risk of self-harm whilst in custody. He did not attempt self-harm while in custody. Mr Lee’s home detention and death As seen, Mr Lee’s bail was subject to a condition that he obey the lawful directions of any supervisor designated to supervise home detention. A supervisor was so designated. On the day of his release from custody, namely 29 February 2008, Mr Lee was met at the premises at , Hallet Cove by a home detention case manager of DCS by the name of Tamara Blythe. Ms Blythe provided a statement to the Inquest. On this occasion Mr Lee identified to Ms Blythe several issues in his life including problematic alcohol consumption, the difficulty that he was having in coming to terms with the charges alleged against him and the fact that he was now subject to home detention bail. The difficulty posed by the restrictive nature of home detention would be mentioned on other occasions by Mr Lee, but it will be remembered that the alternative for Mr Lee would have been a possibly lengthy and unattractive remand in custody. It will be noted that Mr Lee was not the subject of a court imposed Intervention Program pursuant to section 21B of the Bail Act 1985. The imposition of an Intervention Program can be made a condition of a person’s bail. It is meant to provide supervised treatment, supervised rehabilitation, supervised behaviour management or supervised access to support services, or a combination of those things, that are designed to address behavioural problems, substance abuse or mental impairment. Ms Blythe states that she discussed with Mr Lee his interest in being referred to Intervention through DCS. It appears that what Ms Blythe had in mind here was Mr Lee’s possible participation in anger management, victim awareness and alcohol and drug abuse related interventions. Mr Lee indicated that he would like to pursue Intervention. A referral to an Intervention worker at the Edwardstown Community Corrections Centre was later completed and an appointment was made