GESNER PRIORITY 1 SMART Goal Every teacher will use assessment for, as and of learning to improve student achievement in math. Each team will – – explore and use common assessments as needed for each mathematics strand and will compose flexible teaching groups based on this data leading to a 5% increase in students performing at achievement level of 4 in all strands of mathematics. Currently, 15.5% of Kindergarten and grade 1 students performed at achievement level 4. We will enter the student data into a spread sheet to track student progress. Targeted Research-Based Monitoring and Responsibility / Progress Notes Baseline Indicators of Success Strategies / Actions Accountability Timeline Math Mention – Connie Charlton follow the curriculum develop assessments for each team monthly Classroom visited school Oct. math strand establish what is 1, 2, 3, 3+, agenda items Teachers 9 to share portal 4, 4+ for each assessment flexible grouping during math will include math resources with use percentages to have a instruction assessment EST - Resource staff more exact measurement We will invite Yvette discussions Grade level teams of student performance Jones to come and support us Creating a data School met on Oct. 9 to team marking sessions with developing a spread sheet spread sheet by Administration begin organizing using pre and post to track data strand with 3 common assessments that are Mrs. Thorne will forward reporting periods assessments for common across the grade information to us on the first term reporting assessments to be shared Mathematics Improvement period across the grade levels K-2 Project use agreed upon common Mrs. Cripps and Mrs. Owens assessments Developed a will meet with Ms. Seeley track the data in a common common to gather the data from place our June report cards checklist for data and assessments the November discussed at monthly team reporting meetings criteria explore the portal for math K team resources discussed use RTI for students not what achieving grade level represented 1 4 based on – reporting criteria
GESNER PRIORITY 1 – SMART Goal – Every teacher will use assessment for, as and of learning to improve student achievement in math. Each team will explore and use common assessments as needed for each mathematics strand and will compose flexible teaching groups based on this data leading to a 5% increase in students performing at achievement level of 4 in all strands of mathematics. Currently, 15.5% of Kindergarten and grade 1 students performed at achievement level 4. We will enter the student data into a spread sheet to track student progress. Baseline Indicators of Success Targeted Research-Based Strategies / Actions Monitoring and Accountability Responsibility / Timeline Progress Notes follow the curriculum establish what is 1, 2, 3, 3+, 4, 4+ for each assessment use percentages to have a more exact measurement of student performance team marking sessions using pre and post assessments that are common across the grade assessments to be shared across the grade levels K-2 use agreed upon common assessments track the data in a common place data and assessments discussed at monthly team meetings explore the portal for math resources use RTI for students not achieving grade level develop assessments for each math strand flexible grouping during math instruction We will invite Yvette to come and support us with developing a spread sheet to track data Mrs. Thorne will forward information to us on the Mathematics Improvement Project Mrs. Cripps and Mrs. Owens will meet with Ms. Seeley Jones to gather the data from our June report cards team monthly agenda items will include math assessment discussions Creating a data spread sheet by strand with 3 reporting periods Classroom Teachers EST - Resource School Administration Math Mention – Connie Charlton visited school Oct. 9 to share portal resources with staff Grade level teams met on Oct. 9 to begin organizing common assessments for first term reporting period Developed a common checklist for the November reporting criteria K team discussed what represented 1 – 4 based on reporting criteria