addendum of 12 questions. Task to look at first 5 questions within your area in role as ambassador and bring relevant information back. Reviewed authority of the group white paper to Interesting possibility to hear from – make recommendations. At milestones have AUCC reviewers and or University certain members present to Steering Committee. presidents who have gone through the Accreditation Standards framed first meeting experience – with discussion of institutional accreditation Add value to accredit programs through – potential membership in AUCC, and program professional bodies. In some cases the accreditation and professional accreditations. professional accreditation matters more Engaged discussion of the various aspects that than the institutional accreditation. need to be considered. Review paths that Share within Steering Team what different institutions have taken and learning various organizations that we think are from them. All aspects of the accreditation ones that we would like to contact and discussion are actually all of the other explore. People plan will also look at engagement teams. David Marshall’s writing top 100 employers in and out of the encourages identifying for yourself who we are, post-secondary sector. what we want to be. McKewan Grant McKewen turned down in first site – meeting which was a surprise. Challenge was QUALITY Engagement Team looking for around the governance issue. Highlighted the further faculty from Bus, FAAD and Importance of engaging faculty so all are involved and understand. NOTE: Discussed that Engagement Governance meeting next week. Terms of Teams will populate an Engagement – Reference Guest speaker Glen Jones re Team update document to be provided – – different governance structures at Universities. to the steering team and become Looking forward to the opportunity to learn from addendums to the minutes of each those models. meeting. meeting later in January. Infrastructure – Moving from an ownership to a stewardship model for space and resources. Review models in other provinces. Discuss a definition of infrastructure with a look to maximizing our use of resources. meeting later this week, followed People Plan – quickly by a second. Review Draft terms of Meeting schedule document will be reference and vet them. Start discussion of a shared with all teams (Chairs and work plan. Get to know each other re what has support where identified) in order to
addendum of 12 questions. Task to look at first 5 questions within your area in role as ambassador and bring relevant information back. Reviewed authority of the group – white paper to make recommendations. At milestones have certain members present to Steering Committee. Accreditation Standards – framed first meeting with discussion of institutional accreditation – potential membership in AUCC, and program accreditation and professional accreditations. Engaged discussion of the various aspects that need to be considered. Review paths that different institutions have taken and learning from them. All aspects of the accreditation discussion are actually all of the other engagement teams. David Marshall’s writing encourages identifying for yourself who we are, what we want to be. Grant McKewen – turned down in first site meeting which was a surprise. Challenge was around the governance issue. Highlighted the Importance of engaging faculty so all are involved and understand. Governance – meeting next week. Terms of Reference – Guest speaker Glen Jones – re different governance structures at Universities. Looking forward to the opportunity to learn from those models. Infrastructure – meeting later in January. Moving from an ownership to a stewardship model for space and resources. Review models in other provinces. Discuss a definition of infrastructure with a look to maximizing our use of resources. People Plan – meeting later this week, followed quickly by a second. Review Draft terms of reference and vet them. Start discussion of a work plan. Get to know each other re what has Interesting possibility to hear from AUCC reviewers and or University presidents who have gone through the experience Add value to accredit programs through professional bodies. In some cases the professional accreditation matters more than the institutional accreditation. Share within Steering Team what various organizations that we think are ones that we would like to contact and explore. People plan will also look at top 100 employers in and out of the post-secondary sector. McKewan QUALITY Engagement Team looking for further faculty from Bus, FAAD and NOTE: Discussed that Engagement Teams will populate an Engagement Team update document to be provided to the steering team and become addendums to the minutes of each meeting. Meeting schedule document will be shared with all teams (Chairs and support where identified) in order to