- - 30 2014 18-mth Plan + 24-month EP: 12-mth EP: Progress against baseline Output(s) Verification / Year 4.5 Target Baseline 2010 Indicator Who Year 2.5 Target June 2014 (for 24-mth EP) Source (June 2015) (June 2013) Programme Goal: Strengthened governance and rule of law in Pacific Island Countries through enhanced access to justice and professional judicial officers who act independently according to legal principles. PICs have qualitatively and PICs provide year two Perceptions of quality, quantitatively assessed and and four court professionalism, PIC courts and provided court performance data performance data. accessibility, efficiency court users’ PICs have: no for the second year. Courts aware of what and reliability of judicial surveys. common set of court users' needs services. TA indicators to assess Tools have been disseminated to are. court performance or all PICs, and further revision of Statistical data performance these is underway, to assist the collected by PIC All PICs report a enhancement models PICs in the process of assessing All PICs have court courts. continuing positive to transpose, no and reporting on court Participating PICs and judicial trend in court regional governance performance, as well as have qualitatively and performance performance, mechanisms to developing codes of judicial quantitatively feedback from court transparently institutionalise judicial conduct, including the assessed court users and accounting for development or management of internal performance and demonstrate a Evidence of progress performance and manage internal governance/ethics. judicial development positive trend in against judicial routinely using governance / ethics, and participated in internal court development and court Needs performance data to an unquantified Judicial and court officers in all self-improvement performance data. performance goals in each Assessment forward plan. number of PICs have, and are continuing to activities to PIC. survey / regional MSC marginalised receive training in a broad range strengthen discussions at CJ/ prospective court of legal and procedural areas governance, access NC meetings. users and a according to their individual to justice, judicial significant number of needs, and the needs of their administration and lay judicial officers. court. RTT members are professionalism. continuously engaged in designing, facilitating and/or local and regional
- - 30 2014 24-month EP: Year 4.5 Target (June 2015) 18-mth Plan + 12-mth EP: Year 2.5 Target (June 2013) Baseline 2010 Progress against baseline June 2014 Output(s) (for 24-mth EP) Indicator Verification / Source Who Programme Goal: Strengthened governance and rule of law in Pacific Island Countries through enhanced access to justice and professional judicial officers who act independently according to legal principles. All PICs report a continuing positive trend in court performance, transparently accounting for performance and routinely using performance data to forward plan. All PICs have court and judicial performance feedback from court users and demonstrate a positive trend in internal court performance data. PICs have: no common set of indicators to assess court performance or performance enhancement models to transpose, no regional governance mechanisms to institutionalise judicial development or manage internal governance / ethics, an unquantified number of marginalised prospective court users and a significant number of lay judicial officers. PICs have qualitatively and quantitatively assessed and provided court performance data for the second year. Tools have been disseminated to all PICs, and further revision of these is underway, to assist the PICs in the process of assessing and reporting on court performance, as well as developing codes of judicial conduct, including the management of internal governance/ethics. Judicial and court officers in all PICs have, and are continuing to receive training in a broad range of legal and procedural areas according to their individual needs, and the needs of their court. RTT members are continuously engaged in designing, facilitating and/or local and regional PICs provide year two and four court performance data. Perceptions of quality, professionalism, accessibility, efficiency and reliability of judicial services. PIC courts and court users’ surveys. TA Courts aware of what court users' needs are. Participating PICs have qualitatively and quantitatively assessed court performance and judicial development and participated in self-improvement activities to strengthen governance, access to justice, judicial administration and professionalism. Evidence of progress against judicial development and court performance goals in each PIC. Statistical data collected by PIC courts. Needs Assessment survey / regional discussions at CJ/ NC meetings. MSC