[Evaluation of limitations of Source 2B L3] – The cartoon could be biased because it only gives an American artist’s viewpoint The cartoon only shows the Cuban and USSR intervention in Angola, while South Africa and other countries were also involved in the Angolan war but are not depicted The USSR is shown as the driving force behind Cuba, no mention is made of role in supporting the South African intervention in America’s Angola Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 2.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C L1] – Bitter/unhappy (1 x 2) (2) [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C - L2] The USA played a major part in supplying the SADF with arms and information and if Vorster spoke about the then South US’s assistance Africa could lose its backing and support The US government could be criticised on the international stage because of its support of the apartheid regime American citizens had not been informed of the role its government played in the Cold War in Angola The South African government did not want to breach the confidentiality of its communication with the US government Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C L1] – When confronted by the statement that the USA had requested South help in Angola, Vorster stated that are making the statement, Africa’s ‘if you I won’t deny it.’ When confronted by the accusation that Kissinger gave the go ahead for a South African military operation in Angola, Vorster answered you say it ’If of your own accord, I will not call you a (2 x 1) (2) liar.’ [Interpretation of evidence Source 2C L2] – Some African presidents did not support the communist ideology Some African presidents did not support the MPLA government in Angola Some African presidents supported the intervention to help UNITA SADF’s and the FNLA only Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)
[Evaluation of limitations of Source 2B – L3] The cartoon could be biased because it only gives an American artist’s viewpoint The cartoon only shows the Cuban and USSR intervention in Angola, while South Africa and other countries were also involved in the Angolan war but are not depicted The USSR is shown as the driving force behind Cuba, no mention is made of America’s role in supporting the South African intervention in Angola Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 2.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1] Bitter/unhappy (1 x 2) (2) [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C - L2] The USA played a major part in supplying the SADF with arms and information and if Vorster spoke about the US’s assistance then South Africa could lose its backing and support The US government could be criticised on the international stage because of its support of the apartheid regime American citizens had not been informed of the role its government played in the Cold War in Angola The South African government did not want to breach the confidentiality of its communication with the US government Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1] When confronted by the statement that the USA had requested South Africa’s help in Angola, Vorster stated that ‘if you are making the statement, I won’t deny it.’ When confronted by the accusation that Kissinger gave the go ahead for a South African military operation in Angola, Vorster answered ’If you say it of your own accord, I will not call you a liar.’ (2 x 1) (2) [Interpretation of evidence Source 2C – L2] Some African presidents did not support the communist ideology Some African presidents did not support the MPLA government in Angola Some African presidents supported the SADF’s intervention to help UNITA and the FNLA only Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)