Sweden STANK in MIND 0.36 0.31 Swedish Board of (Swedish Board of Agriculture 2013b Agriculture) Sweden ICECREAMDB model 0.41 0.35 Johnsson et al. 2008, Blombäck et al. 2011 Sweden Environmental 0.37 0.32 Eriksson et al. 2010 monitoring Sweden, Landskrona 0 kg N/ha 0.38 0.32 Haak 1998 Sweden, Landskrona 100 kg N/ha 0.35 0.30 Haak 1998 Sweden, Landskrona 150 kg N/ha 0.34 0.29 Haak 1998 Canada, 18 year no tillage 0.40a, b 0.34 Campbell et al. 2011 Saskatchewan UK Content used for nutrient 0.30b 0.26 Berry et al. 2003 balance calculations, organic farming Australia, Long-term study, 0-120 kg 0.40 0.34 Lester et al. 2009 Queensland, New N/ha, 0-20 kg P/ha South Wales Turkey, Israel Wild varieties 0.43-0.52 Gomez-Becerra et al. c 2010 Tenerife One year, no fertilisation, 0.28 0.2370d Rodrígues et al. 2011 wild varieties Bangladesh Three location, three soil 0.28-0.31 Saleque et al. 2006 types, two fertilisation regimes Pakistan Field experiment, 15 0.29b 0.25 Yaseen & Malhi 2009 cultivars, no P fert. Pakistan Field experiment, 15 0.32b 0.27 Yaseen & Malhi 2009 cultivars, P added Spring wheat Not stated if contents are given for DM or fresh material. DM assumed here. Emmer wheat “Fresh” weight, percent MC not stated Table III. Nitrogen (N) concentration in grains of spring barley, in percent of dry matter, in percent of grains with 15 percent moisture content, details about location, notes about the experiment or the model where the contents are used, and the source of reference. DM= dry matter, MC= moisture content. Location Notes % N in % N in Reference DM 15% MC Sweden SCB nutrient balance 2.0 1.7 Haak, 1988 in Claesson and Steineck 1991 Sweden OECD/Eurostat GNB 1.88 1.6 OECD 2012 Indicated source: EUROSTAT Sweden STANK in MIND 1.93 1.64 Swedish Board of
Sweden STANK in MIND (Swedish Board of Agriculture) 0.36 0.31 Swedish Board of Agriculture 2013b Sweden ICECREAMDB model 0.41 0.35 Johnsson et al. 2008, Blombäck et al. 2011 Sweden Environmental monitoring 0.37 0.32 Eriksson et al. 2010 Sweden, Landskrona 0 kg N/ha 0.38 0.32 Haak 1998 Sweden, Landskrona 100 kg N/ha 0.35 0.30 Haak 1998 Sweden, Landskrona 150 kg N/ha 0.34 0.29 Haak 1998 Canada, Saskatchewan 18 year no tillage 0.40a, b 0.34 Campbell et al. 2011 UK Content used for nutrient balance calculations, organic farming 0.30b 0.26 Berry et al. 2003 Australia, Queensland, New South Wales Long-term study, 0-120 kg N/ha, 0-20 kg P/ha 0.40 0.34 Lester et al. 2009 Turkey, Israel Wild varieties c 0.43-0.52 Gomez-Becerra et al. 2010 Tenerife One year, no fertilisation, wild varieties 0.28 0.2370d Rodrígues et al. 2011 Bangladesh Three location, three soil types, two fertilisation regimes 0.28-0.31 Saleque et al. 2006 Pakistan Field experiment, 15 cultivars, no P fert. 0.29b 0.25 Yaseen & Malhi 2009 Pakistan Field experiment, 15 cultivars, P added 0.32b 0.27 Yaseen & Malhi 2009 Spring wheat Not stated if contents are given for DM or fresh material. DM assumed here. Emmer wheat “Fresh” weight, percent MC not stated Table III. Nitrogen (N) concentration in grains of spring barley, in percent of dry matter, in percent of grains with 15 percent moisture content, details about location, notes about the experiment or the model where the contents are used, and the source of reference. DM= dry matter, MC= moisture content. Location Notes % N in DM % N in 15% MC Reference Sweden SCB nutrient balance 2.0 1.7 Haak, 1988 in Claesson and Steineck 1991 Sweden OECD/Eurostat GNB 1.88 1.6 OECD 2012 Indicated source: EUROSTAT Sweden STANK in MIND 1.93 1.64 Swedish Board of