CLO Rubric Development Project Report Form Part 1 – Core Learning Outcome: THINK CRITICALLY Discipline and Faculty: ENGLISH (online Intro to Literature Sequence): Amy Beasley, Anne McGrail, Eileen Thompson, Jennifer Von Ammon Draft Core Learning Outcomes Rubric for for Moodle Discussion Questions and “THINK” Responses Beasley, McGrail, Thompson, Von Ammon English 104, 105, 106 Identify and define key issues Determine information need, find and cite relevant information Demonstrate knowledge of the context and complexity of the issue Integrate other relevant points of view of the issue Evaluate supporting information and evidence Construct appropriate and defensible reasoning to draw conclusions Dimension Accomplished Proficient Developing Failing Assessed* Below 60% Score of 1 “F” Critical Thinking Outstanding Clear General understanding Little or no Lack of Identify and define understanding understanding of the specific content understanding of the understanding key issues of the specific of the specific of the text, question at specific content of of the text, or content of the content of the issue or comment the text, question, or no Demonstrate text, question text, question under discussion. Few comment under engagement knowledge of the or comment or comment new ideas with little discussion. Few new at all with it. context and under under introspection. Postings ideas with no Posting may
CLO Rubric Development Project Report Form – Part 1 Core Learning Outcome: THINK CRITICALLY Discipline and Faculty: ENGLISH (online Intro to Literature Sequence): Amy Beasley, Anne McGrail, Eileen Thompson, Jennifer Von Ammon Draft Core Learning Outcomes Rubric for “THINK” for Moodle Discussion Questions and Responses Beasley, McGrail, Thompson, Von Ammon English 104, 105, 106 Identify and define key issues Determine information need, find and cite relevant information Demonstrate knowledge of the context and complexity of the issue Integrate other relevant points of view of the issue Evaluate supporting information and evidence Construct appropriate and defensible reasoning to draw conclusions Dimension Assessed* Accomplished Proficient Developing Failing Below 60% Score of 1 “F” Critical Thinking Identify and define key issues Demonstrate knowledge of the context and Outstanding understanding of the specific content of the text, question or comment under Clear understanding of the specific content of the text, question or comment under General understanding of the specific content of the text, question at issue or comment under discussion. Few new ideas with little introspection. Postings Little or no understanding of the specific content of the text, question, or comment under discussion. Few new ideas with no Lack of understanding of the text, or no engagement at all with it. Posting may