impacts of coal seam gas and implemented and territory governments, large coal mining projects, industry, business, community evaluated? including the role and scope of organisations and individuals. work ascribed to the Independent Expert Scientific Any scientific and robust Were relevant stakeholders Committee on Coal Seam Gas evidence and/or evaluations of appropriately engaged in and Large Coal Mining impact including consultation implementation? Development (IESC) with the IESC. Scientific advice of the Independent Expert scientific What was the number and Committee nature of projects that were considered as a result of implementation of the regulation? How was the Independent Expert Scientific Committee engaged in the implementation of the regulation and was its advice available to decision makers? What was the nature of any conditions placed on approvals as a result of the regulation? What is the evidence that protection of water resources has improved as a result of the operation of the EPBC Amendment Act 2013? What was the impact of the regulation on the interests of relevant stakeholders? 3. Identify any opportunities to Are gaps in the scope of Submissions, consultation and improve the effectiveness of evidence from the Australian the EPBC Amendment Act the regulation Government, state and 2013 relative to its territory governments, objective?
impacts of coal seam gas and large coal mining projects, including the role and scope of work ascribed to the Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development (IESC) implemented and evaluated? Were relevant stakeholders appropriately engaged in implementation? What was the number and nature of projects that were considered as a result of implementation of the regulation? How was the Independent Expert Scientific Committee engaged in the implementation of the regulation and was its advice available to decision makers? What was the nature of any conditions placed on approvals as a result of the regulation? What is the evidence that protection of water resources has improved as a result of the operation of the EPBC Amendment Act 2013? What was the impact of the regulation on the interests of relevant stakeholders? territory governments, industry, business, community organisations and individuals. Any scientific and robust evidence and/or evaluations of impact including consultation with the IESC. Scientific advice of the Independent Expert scientific Committee 3. Identify any opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the regulation Are gaps in the scope of the EPBC Amendment Act 2013 relative to its objective? Submissions, consultation and evidence from the Australian Government, state and territory governments,