When Mayenne met leaders of the again on Friday 29, views were exchanged more Seize frankly. We learn from Rozée that, after expressing resentment for the contempt that had been shown for his authority, the duke asserted that the recent crisis was aisé ‘fort In defence of their action against Brisson the deputies produced memoirs in the d’appaiser’. hand les moyens de ruiner le party de and claimed that their président’s ‘contenans l’union’ departure from normal judicial procedures had been necessary because the Parlement was filled with supporters. response was double-edged. He would Navarre’s Mayenne’s continue to support the Catholic party, but his authority must be upheld and to that end he – would need control of the Bastille. In a stormy meeting next morning, Mayenne announced that if he was not granted the Bastille he would turn cannon against it. scorned the et Seize: L’Estoile ‘[ils] tumultuoient parloient haut, sans aucun respect, trestous ensemble, à leur Rozée manière accoustumée’. blamed the duke: protests by the deputies firent autre chose que de mettre le duc Seize ‘ne en colère, lequel leur dit avec des paroles dures et hautes…’ On Sunday 1 December Bussy le Clerc quit the Bastille; he was replaced by the Mayennist du Bourg. Years later, Rozée judged that the had had no choice but to capitaine Seize concede, leaving for Mayenne reproche sur le front (comme ils disoient) de la ruine du ‘le At the time, the extent of their setback was not so obvious, for on Monday 2 the party’. leaders petitioned the duke again. Would he establish a so that they chambre de justice could deal with royalist traitors? And would he put their minds at rest by publishing ‘lettres et silence That they had overstepped the mark became obvious d’oubliance perpetuel’. when the demeanour visibly changed: a he said, se mesler duke’s ‘Ce n’estoit eux,’ ‘de
When Mayenne met leaders of the Seize again on Friday 29, views were exchanged more frankly. We learn from Rozée that, after expressing resentment for the contempt that had been shown for his authority, the duke asserted that the recent crisis was ‘fort aisé d’appaiser’. In defence of their action against Brisson the deputies produced memoirs in the président’s hand ‘contenans les moyens de ruiner le party de l’union’ and claimed that their departure from normal judicial procedures had been necessary because the Parlement was filled with Navarre’s supporters. Mayenne’s response was double-edged. He would continue to support the Catholic party, but his authority must be upheld – and to that end he would need control of the Bastille. In a stormy meeting next morning, Mayenne announced that if he was not granted the Bastille he would turn cannon against it. L’Estoile scorned the Seize: ‘[ils] tumultuoient et parloient haut, sans aucun respect, trestous ensemble, à leur manière accoustumée’. Rozée blamed the duke: protests by the Seize deputies ‘ne firent autre chose que de mettre le duc en colère, lequel leur dit avec des paroles dures et hautes…’ On Sunday 1 December Bussy le Clerc quit the Bastille; he was replaced by the Mayennist capitaine du Bourg. Years later, Rozée judged that the Seize had had no choice but to concede, leaving for Mayenne ‘le reproche sur le front (comme ils disoient) de la ruine du party’. At the time, the extent of their setback was not so obvious, for on Monday 2 the leaders petitioned the duke again. Would he establish a chambre de justice so that they could deal with royalist traitors? And would he put their minds at rest by publishing ‘lettres d’oubliance et silence perpetuel’. That they had overstepped the mark became obvious when the duke’s demeanour visibly changed: ‘Ce n’estoit a eux,’ he said, ‘de se mesler