Notes: Indicate to what degree the outputs and outcomes of the programmes were sustainably embedded in the ultimate target group (i.e. were continued independent from contributions from the original donor). Use examples to explain your answer. 2. Planning, monitoring and evaluation (PME) The quality of your organisation's planning, monitoring and evaluation is assessed on the basis of the following criteria: O.2 a: The PME system is sufficient for monitoring progress in terms of outcomes, outputs and sustainability at programme and organisational level. Describe the instruments used to monitor progress and specify the variables measured. Use examples to demonstrate your ability to apply the generated information effectively. O.2 b: The organisation periodically commissions independent evaluations of programmes, programme components and its own functioning. Describe how evaluation is built into your organisation's procedures, including the selection method used to conduct the evaluation. Use examples to demonstrate how the results of evaluations are incorporated in your organisation's activities. O.2 c: The organisation has a sound, integrated system for quality management in place for its primary processes. Notes: Describe how quality management is laid down in your organisation's formal procedures. In addition, describe what progress has been made over the last three years (2010-2012) in developing and/or embedding the quality management system. 3. Financial and administrative management The quality of your organisation's financial and administrative management is assessed on the basis of the following criteria: O.3 a: The applicant/lead organisation has a satisfactory policy on the financial supervision of organisations with which it has a financial relationship.
Notes: Indicate to what degree the outputs and outcomes of the programmes were sustainably embedded in the ultimate target group (i.e. were continued independent from contributions from the original donor). Use examples to explain your answer. 2. Planning, monitoring and evaluation (PME) The quality of your organisation's planning, monitoring and evaluation is assessed on the basis of the following criteria: O.2 a: The PME system is sufficient for monitoring progress in terms of outcomes, outputs and sustainability at programme and organisational level. Describe the instruments used to monitor progress and specify the variables measured. Use examples to demonstrate your ability to apply the generated information effectively. O.2 b: The organisation periodically commissions independent evaluations of programmes, programme components and its own functioning. Describe how evaluation is built into your organisation's procedures, including the selection method used to conduct the evaluation. Use examples to demonstrate how the results of evaluations are incorporated in your organisation's activities. O.2 c: The organisation has a sound, integrated system for quality management in place for its primary processes. Notes: Describe how quality management is laid down in your organisation's formal procedures. In addition, describe what progress has been made over the last three years (2010-2012) in developing and/or embedding the quality management system. 3. Financial and administrative management The quality of your organisation's financial and administrative management is assessed on the basis of the following criteria: O.3 a: The applicant/lead organisation has a satisfactory policy on the financial supervision of organisations with which it has a financial relationship.