performance strategy or local the case backlog in the Supreme feasibility of the practices information against development plans in Court. and procedures as selected key PICs to improve court implemented. performance operations (including The ITOF has been developed, Quality and quantity of indicators. Courts in registry systems and tested and launched with 9 dialogue between IT up to two PICs also processes). nominations received from PICs. administrators in proactively reducing Ongoing monitoring and support participating PIC. delay and their IT will be provided by the PJDP. A regional network of capabilities to support IT administrators Feedback from IT judicial administration established and administrators as to requirements; supported. whether this network specifically relating to mechanism is actually time standards and helping PICs to resolve delay reduction, is relevant IT issues. enhanced. 3.2 Court Annual Reporting (formerly Performance Monitoring & Evaluation) Project All PICs have Refinement of the piloted Court Timely, accurate and increased capacity Reporting Toolkit is underway to comprehensive to assess court include support for implementing, annual court reports performance and collating and analysing court published by up to Up to 6 courts have access to the There is no PIC users’ surveys on barriers to three PICs that publically reporting on TA report & tools need to enable judicial and court accessing, satisfaction with, and include relevant court Number of PICs producing performance on an PEC/CJ TA/ them to increase baseline data utilising confidence in the courts. data as well as court an annual report published annual basis across assessment MSC transparency and a common set of user feedback on and the quality of the data the region. minuted. accountability indicators. The Annual Reporting Toolkit has barriers to accessing, contained therein. through the been implemented in six PICs satisfaction with, and development of during the Court Annual confidence in the Annual Court Reporting Workshop, and courts. Reports. ongoing support has been
performance information against selected key performance indicators. Courts in up to two PICs also proactively reducing delay and their IT capabilities to support judicial administration requirements; specifically relating to time standards and delay reduction, is enhanced. strategy or local development plans in PICs to improve court operations (including registry systems and processes). the case backlog in the Supreme Court. The ITOF has been developed, tested and launched with 9 nominations received from PICs. Ongoing monitoring and support will be provided by the PJDP. feasibility of the practices and procedures as implemented. A regional network of IT administrators established and supported. Quality and quantity of dialogue between IT administrators in participating PIC. Feedback from IT administrators as to whether this network mechanism is actually helping PICs to resolve relevant IT issues. 3.2 Court Annual Reporting (formerly Performance Monitoring & Evaluation) Project Up to 6 courts publically reporting on performance on an annual basis across the region. All PICs have increased capacity to assess court performance and have access to the tools need to enable them to increase transparency and accountability through the development of Annual Court Reports. There is no PIC judicial and court baseline data utilising a common set of indicators. Refinement of the piloted Court Reporting Toolkit is underway to include support for implementing, collating and analysing court users’ surveys on barriers to accessing, satisfaction with, and confidence in the courts. The Annual Reporting Toolkit has been implemented in six PICs during the Court Annual Reporting Workshop, and ongoing support has been Timely, accurate and comprehensive annual court reports published by up to three PICs that include relevant court data as well as court user feedback on barriers to accessing, satisfaction with, and confidence in the courts. Number of PICs producing an annual report published and the quality of the data contained therein. TA report & PEC/CJ assessment minuted. TA/ MSC