an applicable public official during the two years prior to the RFP. Offeror shall complete the non-disclosure statement or make separate disclosures for all campaign contributions given by (1) the Offeror, (2) a family member, or (3) a representative of the Offeror. Any proposal that does not adhere to these requirements may be deemed responsive and rejected on that basis. ARTICLE III. CRITERIA AND EVALUATION POINT SUMMARY EMNRD shall evaluate proposals based on how the project categories correlate with program objectives, given 120 possible points as specified below: Evaluation Criteria Points Offeror meets the NWCG instructor qualifications and currency requirements 40 (40 points); Points will be awarded based on proof of NWCG PMS310-1 current qualifications. Higher qualifications and an ability to teach more Offeror’s courses shall be scored higher. experience conducting fire training courses 20 Offeror’s Points will be awarded based current experience teaching NWCG curriculum. Offerors must document this experience the proposal. experience in wildland fire management 15 Offeror’s Points will be awarded based on the incident qualification master Offeror’s record (IQS or IQCS) and other documented responses to wildland fire management incidents. daily rate per training day (training day equals six to ten hours of 25 Offeror’s instruction. The Forestry Division will not be reimbursing successful Offeror(s) for travel and therefore, such costs need to be reflected in the daily rate. Points will be awarded for total cost of providing training daily. The evaluation will be based on the following formula: Lowest Responsive Offer Amount divided by This Proposed Amount x Award Points. Offeror’s References 20 Points will be awarded based upon an evaluation of the responses to a series of questions that will be asked of the references concerning the quality of the services, the timeliness of services, responsiveness to problems and Offeror’s complaints, and the level of satisfaction with the Offerors overall performance (See Attachment 1, Reference Questionnaire). Maximum possible points 120
an applicable public official during the two years prior to the RFP. Offeror shall complete the non-disclosure statement or make separate disclosures for all campaign contributions given by (1) the Offeror, (2) a family member, or (3) a representative of the Offeror. Any proposal that does not adhere to these requirements may be deemed and rejected on that basis. ARTICLE III. CRITERIA AND EVALUATION POINT SUMMARY EMNRD shall evaluate proposals based on how the project categories correlate with program objectives, given 120 possible points as specified below: Evaluation Criteria Points Offeror meets the NWCG instructor qualifications and currency requirements (40 points); Points will be awarded based on proof of NWCG PMS310-1 current qualifications. Higher qualifications and an Offeror’s ability to teach more courses shall be scored higher. 40 Offeror’s experience conducting fire training courses Points will be awarded based current experience teaching NWCG curriculum. Offerors must document this experience the proposal. 20 Offeror’s experience in wildland fire management Points will be awarded based on the Offeror’s incident qualification master record (IQS or IQCS) and other documented responses to wildland fire management incidents. 15 Offeror’s daily rate per training day (training day equals six to ten hours of instruction. The Forestry Division will not be reimbursing successful Offeror(s) for travel and therefore, such costs need to be reflected in the daily rate. Points will be awarded for total cost of providing training daily. The evaluation will be based on the following formula: Lowest Responsive Offer Amount divided by This Offeror’s Proposed Amount x Award Points. 25 References Points will be awarded based upon an evaluation of the responses to a series of questions that will be asked of the references concerning the quality of the Offeror’s services, the timeliness of services, responsiveness to problems and complaints, and the level of satisfaction with the Offerors overall performance (See Attachment 1, Reference Questionnaire). 20 Maximum possible points 120 responsive