As per 4.2.4, UM181R, 182, 228R, 229, 231, [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 23 – 232, 372, 375 message elements are not Agreed with the suggested change, instructions. update intents to or “request” according to the context of “confirm” Suggested Change: the message. Update Message Intents by replacing to” with to confirm” or In UM181R (from) be replaced by “Instruction “Request to report”. FROM (no need to be a parameter) “Request – added as comment 29 Table A5-8 8 JC R, E Agreed Closed Comment: [CSG Webex 14 March] – UM217 message element is an instruction to with the suggested change report when the aircraft has landed. (already W/U in SPR/INTEROP) Suggested Change: [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 23 – Change resp attribute with W/U. March]: Agreed, editorial. Table A5-8 24 FR Comment: Why not use similar format ? [Editors 21 March]: 294 seems fine Closed – 231/294 as it is. Already proposed and Suggested Change: STATE PREFERED discussed with Chris Adams. LEVEL (level single) OR (level single) [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 23 – March]: Agreed with Editors above. Table A5-8 25 TL Comment: Fix, currently identical to UM294 E [Editors 21 Agreed. Error in Closed – UM307 OPLINK paper. Suggested Change: Should be “Request to provide the required runway visual REQUIRED RVR” [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 23 “REPORT – M, Y March]: Agreed, editorial. Table A5-8 29 US, CSG In UM181R (from) shall be R Agreed Closed Comment: [Editors 21 March]: – UM118R replaced by FROM (no need to be a parameter) see comment 7 the UM181R be read/corrected as – : REPORT DISTANCE FROM Suggested Change: Remove FROM (position ATW) parameter
As per 4.2.4, UM181R, 182, 228R, 229, 231, 232, 372, 375 message elements are not instructions. Suggested Change: Update Message Intents by replacing “Instruction to” with “Request to confirm” or “Request to report”. [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 23 Agreed with the suggested change, update intents to “request” or “confirm” according to the context of the message. In UM181R (from) be replaced by FROM (no need to be a parameter) – added as comment 29 Table A5-8 8 JC Comment: UM217 message element is an instruction to report when the aircraft has landed. Suggested Change: Change resp attribute with W/U. R, E [CSG Webex – 14 March] Agreed with the suggested change (already W/U in SPR/INTEROP) [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 23 March]: Agreed, editorial. Closed Table A5-8 231/294 24 FR Comment: Why not use similar format ? Suggested Change: STATE PREFERED LEVEL (level single) OR (level single) [Editors – 21 March]: 294 seems fine as it is. Already proposed and discussed with Chris Adams. [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 23 March]: Agreed with Editors above. Closed Table A5-8 UM307 25 TL Comment: Fix, currently identical to UM294 Suggested Change: Should be “Request to provide the required runway visual “REPORT REQUIRED RVR” M, Y E [Editors – 21 Agreed. Error in OPLINK paper. [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 23 March]: Agreed, editorial. Closed Table A5-8 UM118R 29 US, CSG Comment: In UM181R (from) shall be replaced by FROM (no need to be a parameter) – see comment 7 Suggested Change: Remove FROM parameter R [Editors – 21 March]: Agreed the UM181R be read/corrected as : REPORT DISTANCE FROM (position ATW) Closed