No but should be coordinated with “EDCT”, ICAO “ELDT” “EOBT”, Action editor: Full/explicit wording “ETOT”, will be provided in SPR/INTEROP. “TOBT”, “TSAT”, Assessment has to be done for the need “TTOT”, for these values. “CSTT” Are these standard ICAO abbreviations? 1 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 22 – March]: Unclear whether all these 2. (direction preposition) abbreviations could be accepted from an ICAO perspective. OPLINKP “AT” secretariat will look into implementing “ON” them. “TO”, “Abeam”, “VIA”, 2 Open “FROM”, – “ONTO” or 2 -[Editors 21 March]: “Clear”, – It shall be assessed by D-TAXI team. “OF” Action is taken to provide this question Are all of these valid values? (How would to SESAR D-TAXI team “of” be applied ???) 3. (time preposition) 2 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 22 – March]: Agreed with Editors. The current definition of (time preposition) is: whether the associated instruction 3 “Indication – is to be performed Closed 3 -[Editors 21 March]: “At” –
“EDCT”, “ELDT” “EOBT”, “ETOT”, “TOBT”, “TSAT”, “TTOT”, “CSTT” Are these standard ICAO abbreviations? 2. (direction preposition) “AT” “ON” “TO”, “Abeam”, “VIA”, “FROM”, “ONTO” “Clear”, or “OF” Are all of these valid values? (How would “of” be applied ???) 3. (time preposition) The current definition of (time preposition) is: “Indication whether the associated instruction is to be performed “At” No but should be coordinated with ICAO Action editor: Full/explicit wording will be provided in SPR/INTEROP. Assessment has to be done for the need for these values. 1 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 22 March]: Unclear whether all these abbreviations could be accepted from an ICAO perspective. OPLINKP secretariat will look into implementing them. 2 -[Editors – 21 March]: It shall be assessed by D-TAXI team. Action is taken to provide this question to SESAR D-TAXI team 2 - [OPLINKP WG/WHL/4 – 22 March]: Agreed with Editors. 3 -[Editors – 21 March]: 2 – Open 3 – Closed