(3) Do both parties s 35(1)(c) Ontario Dairy Cow have unperfected SIs? Leasing Ltd v Ontario Milk Marketing Board, Note: s 35(4) (notes: Ontario case; WestlawNext Canada link) (4) Was SI’s s 35(7) registration discharged without Note: s 35(4) authorization or in error, or did SP fail to renew its SI’s registration? (5) Do the results of s 68(1) KBA Canada Inc v the priority scheme Supreme Graphics appear to be unfair? Ltd, paras 1-32 (C) Are there multiple secured parties with security interests in the same collateral where there is a circular priority problem? Class | Date TOPIC CASE LAW Class 21 | Tue Nov 14 (1) Is achieving a stable priority ranking impossible where there are 3+ parties asserting claims to the same C?
(3) Do both parties have unperfected SIs? s 35(1)(c) Note: s 35(4) Ontario Dairy Cow Leasing Ltd v Ontario Milk Marketing Board, (notes: Ontario case; WestlawNext Canada link) (4) Was SI’s registration discharged without authorization or in error, or did SP fail to renew its SI’s registration? s 35(7) Note: s 35(4) (5) Do the results of the priority scheme appear to be unfair? s 68(1) KBA Canada Inc v Supreme Graphics Ltd, paras 1-32 (C) Are there multiple secured parties with security interests in the same collateral where there is a circular priority problem? Class | Date TOPIC CASE LAW Class 21 | Tue Nov 14 (1) Is achieving a stable priority ranking impossible where there are 3+ parties asserting claims to the same C?