two years after the first effectiveness review will be coordinated with the meeting of the CSC; and put before the GNSO ccNSO. Following then every three years Council as a motion for agreement on the thereafter. The method of consideration. Threshold for process and timeline, review will be determined approval is a simple this could eventually by the ccNSO and GNSO majority vote of each be documented as house, which per Section part of the GNSO 11.3-I of the ICANN Bylaws Operating is the default voting Procedures or as a threshold. standalone document. (c) The CSC Charter shall GNSO Council may approve No new procedures or Assumption: be reviewed by a amendments by majority of changes to the GNSO There is a distinction committee of each house. Operating Procedures between requesting representatives from the and/or ICANN Bylaws. The that the Charter be ccNSO and the Registries PROCESS NOTES: GNSO is decisions to request a reviewed after the Stakeholder Group one of the bodies that is to periodic CSC Charter review first such review, selected by such request the formation of (following the first required forming the Charter organizations. This review committee comprised of review) and appoint a review committee, shall commence one year ccNSO and RySG review committee will be and approving any after the first meeting of representatives, to review put before the GNSO amendments the CSC. Thereafter, the CSC Charter. Council as a motion for following a review CSC Charter shall be consideration Threshold for (see Bylaws Section reviewed by such approval is a simple 17). committee of majority vote of each representatives from the house, which per Section ccNSO and the Registries 11.3-I of the ICANN Bylaws Stakeholder Group is the default voting selected by such threshold. This threshold is organizations at the also specified in Bylaws request of the CSC, ccNSO, Section 17.3(d). GNSO, the Board and/or the PTI Board and/or by an IFRT in connection with an IFR.
two years after the first meeting of the CSC; and then every three years thereafter. The method of review will be determined by the ccNSO and GNSO effectiveness review will be put before the GNSO Council as a motion for consideration. Threshold for approval is a simple majority vote of each house, which per Section 11.3-I of the ICANN Bylaws is the default voting threshold. coordinated with the ccNSO. Following agreement on the process and timeline, this could eventually be documented as part of the GNSO Operating Procedures or as a standalone document. (c) The CSC Charter shall be reviewed by a committee of representatives from the ccNSO and the Registries Stakeholder Group selected by such organizations. This review shall commence one year after the first meeting of the CSC. Thereafter, the CSC Charter shall be reviewed by such committee of representatives from the ccNSO and the Registries Stakeholder Group selected by such organizations at the request of the CSC, ccNSO, GNSO, the Board and/or the PTI Board and/or by an IFRT in connection with an IFR. GNSO Council may approve amendments by majority of each house. PROCESS NOTES: GNSO is one of the bodies that is to request the formation of committee comprised of ccNSO and RySG representatives, to review CSC Charter. No new procedures or changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures and/or ICANN Bylaws. The decisions to request a periodic CSC Charter review (following the first required review) and appoint a review committee will be put before the GNSO Council as a motion for consideration Threshold for approval is a simple majority vote of each house, which per Section 11.3-I of the ICANN Bylaws is the default voting threshold. This threshold is also specified in Bylaws Section 17.3(d). Assumption: There is a distinction between requesting that the Charter be reviewed after the first such review, forming the Charter review committee, and approving any amendments following a review (see Bylaws Section 17).