The Redondo Beach contract is not needed to meet a local need in 2018 through 2020. There is no evidence that this contract is needed for local reliability in 2018 and beyond. The Alamitos and Huntington Beach contracts are reasonably priced. Consistent with D.02-08-071, SCE’s Procurement Review Group was notified of the AES contracts on August 9, 2016. An Independent Evaluator was not used for the AES Southland Contracts. The Alamitos and Huntington Beach contracts are not inconsistent with the Energy Action Plan (EAP) loading order. The Alamitos and Huntington Beach contracts are in compliance with the Commission’s once through cooling procurement rules. The Alamitos and Huntington Beach contracts are in compliance with SCE’s Public Utilities Code Section 454.5 Bundled Procurement Plan, to the extent applicable. The request of Southern California Edison that the Commission approve the bilaterally negotiated resource adequacy contract between Southern California Edison and AES Alamitos, LLC for 2,010.38 MW from June 2018 to December 2019 and 1,165.82 MW from January 2019 to December 2020 is granted. The request of Southern California Edison that the Commission approve the bilaterally negotiated resource adequacy contract between Southern California Edison and AES Huntington Beach, LLC for 451.55 MW from June 2018 to December 2019 and 225.8 MW for January 2020 to December 2020 is granted. Southern California Edison’s entry into the bilaterally negotiated resource adequacy contract with AES Alamitos and Huntington Beach, LLC is reasonable and prudent for all purposes, including, but not limited to, recovery in rates of payments made pursuant to these contracts, subject only to further review with respect to the reasonableness of Southern California Edison’s administration of this contract. The request of Southern California Edison that the Commission approve the bilaterally negotiated resource adequacy contract between Southern
The Redondo Beach contract is not needed to meet a local need in 2018 through 2020. There is no evidence that this contract is needed for local reliability in 2018 and beyond. The Alamitos and Huntington Beach contracts are reasonably priced. Consistent with D.02-08-071, SCE’s Procurement Review Group was notified of the AES contracts on August 9, 2016. An Independent Evaluator was not used for the AES Southland Contracts. The Alamitos and Huntington Beach contracts are not inconsistent with the Energy Action Plan (EAP) loading order. The Alamitos and Huntington Beach contracts are in compliance with the Commission’s once through cooling procurement rules. The Alamitos and Huntington Beach contracts are in compliance with SCE’s Public Utilities Code Section 454.5 Bundled Procurement Plan, to the extent applicable. The request of Southern California Edison that the Commission approve the bilaterally negotiated resource adequacy contract between Southern California Edison and AES Alamitos, LLC for 2,010.38 MW from June 2018 to December 2019 and 1,165.82 MW from January 2019 to December 2020 is granted. The request of Southern California Edison that the Commission approve the bilaterally negotiated resource adequacy contract between Southern California Edison and AES Huntington Beach, LLC for 451.55 MW from June 2018 to December 2019 and 225.8 MW for January 2020 to December 2020 is granted. Southern California Edison’s entry into the bilaterally negotiated resource adequacy contract with AES Alamitos and Huntington Beach, LLC is reasonable and prudent for all purposes, including, but not limited to, recovery in rates of payments made pursuant to these contracts, subject only to further review with respect to the reasonableness of Southern California Edison’s administration of this contract. The request of Southern California Edison that the Commission approve the bilaterally negotiated resource adequacy contract between Southern