1.3.2: The capacity of a. Organise at least four workshops for All 2012-2017 60,000 per Secretariat Identify options for AEWA-related representatives of governments of all workshop synergies with other government officers CPs; efforts should also be made to MEAs on this training; in all CPs to enhance capacity of NGOs, which Identify expert participate in often need to alert governments to organisations to deliver EIA/SEA processes is ensure that reports are comprehensive the training improved enough and mitigation provisions are sensible 1.3.3: The AEWA a. The Secretariat is informed in a All 2012-2017 0 Agencies in charge of Information is only passed Implementation timely manner of all major cases AEWA implementation on when relevant from Review Process (IRP) having adverse effects or potential in each CP / other AEWA agencies or is used for resolving adverse effects on AEWA waterbird partner organisations other partner severe/adverse cases populations or their habitats as a result organisations of threats to AEWA of human activities populations in b. Funds are secured and the AEWA All 2012-2017 As needed Secretariat in close Where relevant, the IRP African CPs IRP is implemented where relevant for each collaboration with the will be implemented in case AEWA StC and TC close collaboration with other MEAs and partner organisations (e.g. the Ramsar Secretariat, BirdLife International, Wetlands International) Table 4: Results and actions for implementing target 1.4 of objective 1 Target 1.4: Single Species Action (SSAPs) are developed and implemented for most threatened species listed in category 1 and categories 2 and 3 marked with an asterisk on column A of Table 1 Result Action Geographic scope Time frame Budget (€) Lead Comments
1.3.2: The capacity of AEWA-related government officers in all CPs to participate in EIA/SEA processes is improved a. Organise at least four workshops for representatives of governments of all CPs; efforts should also be made to enhance capacity of NGOs, which often need to alert governments to ensure that reports are comprehensive enough and mitigation provisions are sensible All 2012-2017 60,000 per workshop Secretariat Identify options for synergies with other MEAs on this training; Identify expert organisations to deliver the training 1.3.3: The AEWA Implementation Review Process (IRP) is used for resolving severe/adverse cases of threats to AEWA populations in African CPs a. The Secretariat is informed in a timely manner of all major cases having adverse effects or potential adverse effects on AEWA waterbird populations or their habitats as a result of human activities All 2012-2017 0 Agencies in charge of AEWA implementation in each CP / other partner organisations Information is only passed on when relevant from AEWA agencies or other partner organisations b. Funds are secured and the AEWA IRP is implemented where relevant All 2012-2017 As needed for each case Secretariat in close collaboration with the AEWA StC and TC Where relevant, the IRP will be implemented in close collaboration with other MEAs and partner organisations (e.g. the Ramsar Secretariat, BirdLife International, Wetlands International) Table 4: Results and actions for implementing target 1.4 of objective 1 Target 1.4: Single Species Action (SSAPs) are developed and implemented for most threatened species listed in category 1 and categories 2 and 3 marked with an asterisk on column A of Table 1 Result Action Geographic scope Time frame Budget (€) Lead Comments