1.A.v. Contribution, coordination, or oversight related to the design, development, or refinement of new or existing courses, curricula, or pedagogies (e.g., textbooks, archival course materials 2.A.vi. Teaching-related nominations, honors, awards, and/or other recognition 1.A.vii. Participation in professional development activities to enhance knowledge as it pertains to instructional capacity. Factors contributing to the weighting of professional development activities include, but are not limited to, evidence that the professional development made a tangible contribution to the candidate’s teaching activities. Service 1.B. A case for promotion should demonstrate significant and substantial contributions to the mission of SSFD. Primary Indicator 1.B.i. Demonstrated use of professional skills to effectively contribute to, manage, and/or develop a program, project, or initiative that contributes to the mission of SSFD. Secondary Indicators 1.B.ii Participation in school level-committees, and/or membership of CLAS and University-level committees. 1.B.iii. Membership contributions to local, regional, state or national boards, committees, councils, or groups. 1.B.iv. Participation in or contributions to project/program, SSFD, College, or University promotional events or press. 1.B.vi. Participation in and/or coordination of outreach efforts, including trainings, consultation, workshops, presentations, conferences, forums and translation of research /or university initiatives and activities to lay or professional audiences. 1.B.vii. Service-related nominations, honors, awards, and/or other recognition. Research 1.C.For cases in which a clinical professor has research as part of the workload percentage, a case for promotion should demonstrate contributions to the research mission of SSFD as proportional to research workload allocation. Primary Indicator 1.C.i. Involvement in SSFD research initiatives and activities (e.g., project/grant execution, data analysis, program development). Factors contributing to the weighting of these contributions include, but are not limited to, candidates’ amount/level of involvement and their successes and achievements stemming from that involvement.
1.A.v. Contribution, coordination, or oversight related to the design, development, or refinement of new or existing courses, curricula, or pedagogies (e.g., textbooks, archival course materials 2.A.vi. Teaching-related nominations, honors, awards, and/or other recognition 1.A.vii. Participation in professional development activities to enhance knowledge as it pertains to instructional capacity. Factors contributing to the weighting of professional development activities include, but are not limited to, evidence that the professional development made a tangible contribution to the candidate’s teaching activities. Service 1.B. A case for promotion should demonstrate significant and substantial contributions to the mission of SSFD. Primary Indicator 1.B.i. Demonstrated use of professional skills to effectively contribute to, manage, and/or develop a program, project, or initiative that contributes to the mission of SSFD. Secondary Indicators 1.B.ii Participation in school level-committees, and/or membership of CLAS and University-level committees. 1.B.iii. Membership contributions to local, regional, state or national boards, committees, councils, or groups. 1.B.iv. Participation in or contributions to project/program, SSFD, College, or University promotional events or press. 1.B.vi. Participation in and/or coordination of outreach efforts, including trainings, consultation, workshops, presentations, conferences, forums and translation of research /or university initiatives and activities to lay or professional audiences. 1.B.vii. Service-related nominations, honors, awards, and/or other recognition. Research 1.C.For cases in which a clinical professor has research as part of the workload percentage, a case for promotion should demonstrate contributions to the research mission of SSFD as proportional to research workload allocation. Primary Indicator 1.C.i. Involvement in SSFD research initiatives and activities (e.g., project/grant execution, data analysis, program development). Factors contributing to the weighting of these contributions include, but are not limited to, candidates’ amount/level of involvement and their successes and achievements stemming from that involvement.