<s>[INST] Here are two arguments with the same conclusion. Identify the conclusion, and identify the premises and the conclusion of each argument.
**Argument 1:**
If there is a large-enough eruption, then there won't be a tournament. The eruption is going to be large enough. Therefore, there won't be a tournament.
**Argument 2:**
The volcano is going to erupt and it cannot erupt without causing sufficient ashfall to force cancellation of the tournament. Therefore, there won't be a tournament.
**Common Conclusion:** There won't be a tournament.
**Argument 1:**
Premise 1: If there is a large-enough eruption, then there won't be a tournament.
Premise 2: The eruption is going to be large enough.
Conclusion: There won't be a tournament.
**Argument 2:**
Premise 1: The volcano is going to erupt.
Premise 2: The volcano cannot erupt without causing sufficient ashfall to force cancellation of the tournament.
Conclusion: There won't be a tournament.
What is the common conclusion of these two arguments?[/INST]