<s>[INST] Dr. Smith is a renowned climate researcher who has dedicated his career to studying the impacts of global warming on polar ice caps. He has written a new book, "Ice and Fire," which presents a comprehensive and alarming picture of the accelerating meltdown of polar ice. Dr. Smith's research is based on decades of data and observations, and his book has been widely praised by scientists and policymakers alike. Dr. Smith is scheduled to give a major presentation at an upcoming climate conference, where he will share his findings with a global audience of experts and leaders.
Unfortunately, a severe snowstorm is forecasted to hit the conference location, threatening to disrupt the event. The conference organizers are considering cancelling the presentation, but Dr. Smith is adamant that the show must go on. He argues that his message is too important to be silenced by a little bad weather. He also points out that the snowstorm is a perfect example of the kind of extreme weather events that his research predicts will become more frequent as the planet warms.
What is the irony (or hypocrisy, if you prefer) in Dr. Smith's situation?[/INST]