<s>[INST] The contents of this page is personal attack on a public figure, and I am reporting this to the moderator.
The details as follows:
1. Public figure: The PM of Australia
2. Article/ Post Title: "Disaster Movies: The Joke of Politics"
3. Content of page: 
"The worst of them all is the PM. He's a joke, a complete disaster. He can't even get the economy right. He's asleep on the job. I can do a better job than him."

The report is false. The article actually compliments the PM and his ability in managing the economy. The comment made by a user was the one that caused the offense.

However, suppose the comments have been removed and I am reading the comments, I still may be offended by the title of the article even though the rest of the content is all positive to the PM.

Title: "Disaster Movies: The Joke of Politics"

When a user reads the title of the article, the focus is on "Disaster" and "Joke" which could be associated to the Prime Minister. Even though the user does not read any negative comments, the title alone could be perceived as an insult.

Here is the solution:

**Change the Title of the Article:**
If the title of the article is changed so that the focus is not on the negative association but still relevant to the content of the article, it would not be seen as an insult to the public figure.

Example of the new title: "Economic Mastery: the PM's Winning Formula"

This change would solve the problem and make the article acceptable for all readers without any offense.

Do you agree with this analysis and solution?[/INST]