<s>[INST] These are two sentences taken from a review paragraph:
1. But when the edifice is compromised, when individual mistakes are made by players, the defensive organization looks less than sound.
2. Of course, Repsol Honda’s young gun two has a proneness towards taking greater risks, a stylistic element that simultaneously excites and infuriates.

It puzzles me how the sentences (1) and (2) are organized in relation to each other. Both of the sentences indicate the source of the team's weaknesses - theplayers' mistakes in sentence (1) and Repsol Honda's flashy style of play in sentence (2). But the two sentences don't form a causality chain (e.g., one being the reason of the other), nor do they provide contrasting ideas. So, I'm not sure what relationship these sentences express to each other?[/INST]