<s>[INST] I think there are a few issues with the definition of infinity that have not been properly addressed. The concept of infinity is treated as if it were a number or a quantity, when in fact it is not. It's more of a concept or an idea. This idea is often conveyed through math, but it can also be explained in words.

One issue with the concept of infinity is that it's often described as being without bounds or limits. However, this description implies that there is something that it is beyond or outside of, which seems to be contradictory. If infinity is truly without bounds, then it should not be possible to describe it in relation to something else. For example, if you say "infinity is bigger than a million," you're already assuming that infinity is within a framework or system that includes a million, and therefore it's not truly without bounds.

Another issue that I think has not been properly addressed is the fact that our understanding of infinity is based on a binary system of math, which is inherently limited. We represent infinity using symbols such as ∞, but these symbols are still based on a finite set of rules and axioms. This means that our understanding of infinity is always filtered through a lens of finitude, and we can never truly grasp the concept in its entirety.

Finally, I think there is an issue with how we treat infinity as a static concept, when in fact it may be more dynamic and relational. Infinity is often described as a fixed quantity, but what if it's actually a quality or a property of certain systems or relationships?[/INST]