<s>[INST] I was wondering if you could help me with a hypothetical situation. Let's say that a driver is driving down the road and their car suddenly loses power and they coast to the side of the road. Once they turn off the ignition, they notice that the car won't start again. They try jump-starting the car, but that doesn't work. They then have it towed to a repair shop. Once at the repair shop, a mechanic inspects the car and finds that the problem is that the alternator has failed and needs to be replaced. The total bill for a new alternator, labor, and towing comes to around $800. 
Now here's the hypothetical situation. Let's say that this driver was involved in a car accident 2 years ago, where they rear-ended another car. The accident was not their fault, the other driver was completely at fault and all parties agreed to that. The driver did have to replace the front bumper and some other minor repairs at the time, which was covered by the other driver's insurance. However, the driver also had to replace the alternator at the time due to damage sustained in the accident. 
The driver is now wondering if the insurance company from the other driver (from the accident 2 years ago) is still obligated to pay for the replacement of the alternator, given that it was damaged in the accident. What are some arguments that the driver could make, and what are some arguments that the insurance company could make, and what are the likely outcomes?[/INST]