<s>[INST] Science is in constant flux. Researchers and scientists seldom agree on new ideas, theories, and findings. This makes scientific progress seem chaotic and disorderly, even confusing. So, it's no wonder that many people and even some scientists struggle to distinguish between an excellent idea and an obviously terrible one.

However, there has always been an orderly process underlying all the apparent turmoil, confusion, and contradictions in the scientific community. Despite the seeming lack of harmony among scientists, individual researchers generally adhere to a widely accepted set of principles and values that ensure progress moves in a steady, albeit slow, pace.

Which of the following statements, if true, would weaken the argument's claim that there is an orderly process underlying scientific progress?[/INST]