<s>[INST] It makes little sense that students who enter a post-secondary institution with the equivalent of 11th grade math and pass math courses at the 13th-grade level while attending college should still be charged the same tuition rate as student who only take math courses at the 11th-grade level. A college should charge more for maintaining higher levels of math proficiency.
Points for and against this proposal are the following:

**For**
1) Properly incentivizing STEM faculty to develop advanced-level math courses by providing enough budget allocations to hire lecturers who are qualified to teach those advanced-level courses.
2) It is fair that students who seek higher levels of math proficiency are charged more for them because the analogy of wine clubs suggests that people will pay more for things that are rarer, or perceived to be of better quality.

**Against**
1) Charging more for more advanced math courses may lead to fewer students seeking higher-level math proficiency.
2) charging more for more advanced math courses is an affront to the principle of ensuring equal access to advanced math education for low-income students.
**Questions**

(1) What would be the most helpful counter-argument to the point that if we charge more for advanced math courses, we would deter students from enrolling?[/INST]