<s>[INST] In a certain jurisdiction, a person is guilty of disorderly conduct if he recklessly disturbs a public meeting or assembly. To be convicted, each of the following elements must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. The defendant committed an act that disturbed a meeting;
2. The defendant was reckless in committing the act;
3. The meeting which was disturbed was a public meeting or assembly.
The prosecution must show that the defendant's actions caused a disturbance, such as individuals leaving the meeting, loud outbursts, etc. If all three elements are met, what will be the outcome of the trial?[/INST]