<s>[INST] I was reading history of a fort. Some historians claimed that fort was destroyed by the enemy, while others said it was destroyed due to an earthquake. I have found that historians are often looking at same information but interpreting it their own way. That historians were instance of two often seem self-conscience of pervasiveness of faulty cognitions and biases. Does an approach exists which may shield against biases that cognitive psychology has identified and academia continues to build upon?[/INST]