<s>[INST] I like to edit Wikipedia to help with mental health information.
Great, Harnessing volunteer energies helps keep information up to date. However, to raise the bar on this topic, suggest improvements that can be better addressed by involving collaborated efforts from academic and professional communities.

Academic experts in psychology, sociology, and related specialties can help refine the presentation of existing research and theory. Such participatory approaches can help assess the relevance and reliability of the information available.
 
More specific points to address in a collaborative effort:
1. Summarize research findings for easier comprehension in a readable format.
2. Provide substantial contextual background to establish authoritative evidence for mental health article content. 
3. Ensure that article subheadings follow a logical and coherent structure, so conducive to the understanding of standard concepts.
4. Affirm that prominent research figures within the realm are properly cited, and their contributions suitably incorporated. Properly offers that seminal papers are exhaustively exposed to ignite forums of discussions and offer transparency in tones more remarkable.
 
These advantages would better integrate mental health information into Wikipedia's mission to provide accurate information.
 
How can you involve experts with these improvements and encourage them to contribute to Wikipedia?[/INST]