<s>[INST] This is not a discussion, nor structured as such. I'd like assistance formulating a proper meta discussion or proposal for changes to community policies. 

I will provide a series of items that I believe are non-core, non-consensus arguments that are being used in a particular, established Stack Exchange site. After 4-5 examples, I want to see a formatted proposal draft, using ideas you think are congruent with Stack Exchange's ethos. Here are the first 5 examples:

1. A question asking how a novice could learn Morse Code."
   - Closed as: "off-topic" for lack of evident programming relevance. (More than 30 similar questions remain open.)
2. A question asking about the best book on 'The Art of War' by Sun Tzu.
   - Comment: "this is not a programming-related question" 
   - Closed as: "opinion-based" (6 hours later).
3. A mnemonic device to remember the planets ordering.
   - Closed as: "off-topic" due to lack of programming relevance.
4. A question asking how to preserve fresh oregano.
   - Closed as: "off-topic" for no programming relevance.
5. A question asking how numbers were assigned to colors.
   - Closed as: "opinion-based" despite the question asking for origins, not an opinion.

These examples are taken from the Great Outdoors Stack Exchange, and all are kept from December 2021 or later.

It sounds like users are using a biased perspective to determine off-topic. How should I frame this meta discussion to productively bring this to the community's attention and propose positive actions?[/INST]