1⃣️有两位警察的证词 2⃣️有四位在公寓的目击者证词 3⃣️有之后持续一周的监控录像 都表明没有在艾女士脸上见到任何伤痕，且艾女士拒绝了警察的帮助、拒绝了法院的验伤。我不知道为什么说这是反咬，这是为自己的合理权益斗争，一切走法律途径，就因为她是女性所以她一定是对的？
Two police officers testified, two witnesses testified in the apartment, and a week after that, the surveillance footage showed that there were no injuries on Ms. Ai's face, and that Ms. Ai refused the police help and the court examination. I don't know why it was a counter-bite, it was a legitimate struggle for her rights, and everything was legal, just because she was a woman, so she must be right?