因果搞反了吧，同样阅读理解，我没看出博主有说这个意思，博主表达的意思明明是极端女权会要求冠母性，但冠母性不代表极端女权，前面都表达了冠姓是一件私事，二选一的问题。
It's also read and understood that I don't see the blogger saying that, even though extreme feminism requires coronaryism, it does not represent extreme femininity, which is a private matter.