三句话的主语一样吗？但是我不认同你最后一句话，很多人并不懂得第一时间反抗，原因很复杂（自己没有能力判断事情的严重性；可能被胁迫；可能家庭教育有关），而且事情发生前，可以这样教育；但是事情发生后，说这些有用吗？不是应该鼓励受害者先发声，再核查，再定罪，上一轮结束。再开始下一轮教育？
Is the three words the same? But I don't agree with your last words. Many people don't understand the first-time resistance for complex reasons (the inability of themselves to judge the seriousness of the matter; the possibility of coercion; the possibility of family education) and the possibility of such education before it happens; but does it work when it happens? Shouldn't the victim be encouraged to speak, then verify, then convict, and end the last round?