generate questions: However, Mathews' frustration with Whitehead's books did not negatively affect his interest. In fact, there were numerous philosophers and theologians at Chicago's Divinity School that perceived the importance of what Whitehead was doing without fully grasping all of the details and implications. In 1927 they invited one of America's only Whitehead experts – Henry Nelson Wieman – to Chicago to give a lecture explaining Whitehead's thought. Wieman's lecture was so brilliant that he was promptly hired to the faculty and taught there for twenty years, and for at least thirty years afterward Chicago's Divinity School was closely associated with Whitehead's thought.
What affect did Matthews' opinion of the difficulty of Whitehead's works have on his interest in them? {sep_token} How did many philosophers and theologians at Chicago's Divinity School view Whitehead's work? {sep_token} What expert on Whitehead delivered a lecture at the school to explain Whitehead's ideas? {sep_token} What was the result of that lecture? {sep_token} Who was frustrated in Whitehead's books but still interested? {sep_token} What school recognized the importance of Whitehead's work? {sep_token} When was Henry Nelson Wieman invited to the Chicago Divinity school? {sep_token} Who was invited to the Chicago Divinity school as one of Whitehead's only experts? {sep_token} What happened after Henry Nelson Wieman gave a lecture about Whitehead? {sep_token}