generate questions: Wright himself believed that values >0.25 represent very great genetic variation and that an FST of 0.15–0.25 represented great variation. However, about 5% of human variation occurs between populations within continents, therefore FST values between continental groups of humans (or races) of as low as 0.1 (or possibly lower) have been found in some studies, suggesting more moderate levels of genetic variation. Graves (1996) has countered that FST should not be used as a marker of subspecies status, as the statistic is used to measure the degree of differentiation between populations, although see also Wright (1978).
FST values greater than .25 represent very great what? {sep_token} About how much human variation occurs between continental populations? {sep_token} FST values as low as what amount have been found in some studies? {sep_token} What is the name of the person who thinks FST shouldn't be used as a marker of subspecies status? {sep_token} FST is used to measure the degree of differentiation between what? {sep_token}