generate questions: While the notion that structural and aesthetic considerations should be entirely subject to functionality was met with both popularity and skepticism, it had the effect of introducing the concept of "function" in place of Vitruvius' "utility". "Function" came to be seen as encompassing all criteria of the use, perception and enjoyment of a building, not only practical but also aesthetic, psychological and cultural.
What term replaced Vitruvius' term "utility"? {sep_token} In addition to being practically useful what other aspects did a building need in order to be considered functional? {sep_token} Whose concept of utility did the more modern concept of function replace? {sep_token} What aspects of a building were considered part of the larger concept of function? {sep_token} What were the reactions to the idea that function should come before other concerns? {sep_token}