Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.

So I'm a junior in JROTC and I went to a community service for setting up and helping a local 5k-10k run. After we had set up the over-all CO (Commanding Officer) who is the instructor in charge of the program at my school said that if we brought money we could go get breakfast at the nearby diner. I brought 2 cadets with me, we sat down, and ordered our food when the student NCO-IC (Basically the student 2nd in command of the event) told us to have intervals with one of us getting food, while the others did our jobs (which was passing out water to the finished runners, but the run hadn't even began. I said it was BS but I'd do it. I waited, our food arrived, and I went to go get the other 2. The NCO-IC and the O-IC (essentially student 1st in command of the event) told me to wait while the other 2 got food, I actually called that BS and went to go do my job, I passed the CO and asked him about it and he said it was illogical, I should go get food. I told the NCO-IC and the O-IC and they were pissed because I didn't inform them that I was going to the CO, violating the chain of command. I technically did do this by not informing them, but I went up it as I was supposed to. Anyways I got my food, which the 'ICs complained I didn't get to go and got back, and started my job with a few minutes to spare. 

It's long and confusing if you were never in JROTC but comment if you have any questions.
answerable
In this anecdote, the author describes an event in which they were working a community service event. The OIC and NCO-IC (overall commanding officer and non-commissioned officer in charge) told them to wait for food while the other two people who came with them got to eat first. The author then went to ask the OIC about it, but was not satisfied by their response so went to ask the CO instead. The CO said that it was illogical for them not to go get food, so they did anyway. Then when they returned from getting food with their two companions, both of whom had also gone without eating because of this rule, the OIC and NCO-IC complained that they had not notified them before going up the chain of command (to talk to someone higher up than you) about this problem.\nThe answer is 'answerable' because it seems like what happened here is that both of these officers are being unfair towards these cadets and are making an unnecessary rule about when cadets can eat at a time where there's no reason for such a rule besides controlling all aspects of these cadets' behavior even when it makes little sense (for example, there's no reason why only one person would be allowed to get food at a time)..