Background: When peer feedback is established it allows students to interact with their peers and creates high social skills while learning material more effectively. Interaction with other students allows students to have better social approaches when interacting. Learning by peer feedback gives students more of an opportunity to work as a unit instead of individuals working alone. Working in groups gives students more useful life skill that well help prepare them for the future. Peer feedback gives more control to the student, the student can decide if they want to use the criticism their peers are giving them or not. When given options more students are more likely to give and absorb more feedback. Peer feedback has confirmed an increase in affect; students that have increasing responsibilities have more drive towards their work and a spike in confidence.[6] Furthermore, Kristanto (2018) found that peer feedback is an essential element of peer assessment. In peer assessment, feedback from peers can provide suggestions or correction for students' future works as companion of the received grade.[7]

Paragraph: Two school districts adopted two different strategies in educating their students. Park's district made the students work in groups at all times, the students from Lake's district were instructed to work by themselves and in isolation.

Given the paragraph above, please answer correctly the following question: Which district's students got less peer feedback?
Lake's
The paragraph describes how Park's district had students work in groups, and Lake's district instructed their students to work by themselves.
Interaction with other students allows for peer feedback and improves social skills. In contrast, working alone does not allow the student to interact or learn from others, resulting in less peer feedback. So we can infer that the answer is "Lake", who was isolated from peers while learning material.