Consolidated Edison Company of New York v. National Labor Relations Board
[Syllabus from pages 197-203 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Wm. L. Ransom, of New York City, for Petitioners Consolidated Edison Co. and others.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 203-210 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Charles Fahy, of Washington, D.C., for respondent National Labor Relations Board.

[Argument of Counsel from Pages 210-211 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Isaac Lobe Straus, of Baltimore, Md., Claude A. Hope, of New York City, for Petitioners International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and others.

[Argument of Counsel from page 212 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Joseph A. Padway, for petitioners in No. 25.

[Argument of Counsel from Pages 215-216 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Louis B. Boudin, of New York City, for respondent-intervener United Electrical and Radio Workers of America.

Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court. 

Notes
Uncategorized United States Supreme Court decision