Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company v. Alexander/Opinion of the Court
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U.S. 596, 600, 57 L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609; Manhattan L. Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U.S. 123, 137, 58 L. ed. 1245, 1254, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U.S. 380, 59 L. ed. 279, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 133; (2) Missouri P. R. Co. v. Humes, 115 U.S. 512, 29 L. ed. 463, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 110; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Beckwith, 129 U.S. 26, 32 L. ed. 585, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 207; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Emmons, 149 U.S. 364, 37 L. ed. 769, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 870; (3) Waters-Pierce Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 112, 118, 53 L. ed. 431, 434, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co. 226 U.S. 102, 57 L. ed. 140, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 80; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U.S. 31, 59 L. ed. 112, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 14. 

Notes