Sears v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant/Opinion of the Court
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U.S. 168, 181, 19 Sup. Ct. 644, 43 L. Ed. 936; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U.S. 239, 243, 20 Sup. Ct. 867, 44 L. Ed. 1052; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 Sup. Ct. 892, 58 L. Ed. 1557; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 Sup. Ct. 97, 60 L. Ed. 186; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89, 100, 25 Sup. Ct. 727, 50 L. Ed. 101; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 232, 27 Sup. Ct. 476, 51 L. Ed. 779; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 79, 29 Sup. Ct. 580, 53 L. Ed. 914; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285, 59 L. Ed. 544; (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co., 228 U.S. 596, 599, 33 Sup. Ct. 605, 57 L. Ed. 982; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 304, 37 Sup. Ct. 643, 61 L. Ed. 1153; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 Sup. Ct. 264, 62 L. Ed. 701. 

Notes