Different convolutional neural network (CNN) models have been tested for their application in histologic imaging analyses. However, these models are prone to overfitting due to their large parameter capacity, requiring more data and expensive computational resources for model training. Given these limitations, we developed and tested PlexusNet for histologic evaluation using a single GPU by a batch dimension of 16x512x512x3 . We utilized 62 Hematoxylin and eosin stain (H&E) annotated histological images of radical prostatectomy cases from TCGA-PRAD and Stanford University , and 24 H&E whole-slide images with hepatocellular carcinoma from TCGA-LIHC diagnostic histology images. Base models were DenseNet, Inception V3, and MobileNet and compared with PlexusNet. The dice coefficient (DSC) was evaluated for each model . PlexusNet delivered comparable classification performance ( DSC at patch level: 0.89) for H E whole-slice images in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal tissues. The parameter capacity of PlexusNet is 9 times smallerthan MobileNet or 58 times smaller than Inception V3, respectively. Similar findings were observed in distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from non-cancerous liver histologies (DSC at patch level: 0.85). As conclusion, PlexusNet represents a novel model architecture for histological image analysis that achieves classification performance comparable to the base models while providing orders-of-magnitude memory savings .
Different convolutional neural network (CNN) models have been tested for their application in histological image analyses. However, these models are prone to overfitting due to their large parameter capacity, requiring more data or valuable computational resources for model training. Given these limitations, we introduced a novel architecture (termed PlexusNet) . We utilized 310 Hematoxylin and Eosin stained (H&E) annotated histological images of prostate cancer cases from TCGA-PRAD and Stanford University and 398 H&E whole slides images from the Camelyon 2016 challenge. PlexusNet-architecture -derived models were compared to models derived from several existing "state of the art" architectures. We measured discrimination accuracy, calibration, and clinical utility. An ablation study was conducted to study the effect of each component of PlexusNet on model performance. A well-fitted PlexusNet-based model delivered comparable classification performance ( AUC: 0.963) in distinguishing prostate cancer from healthy tissues, although it was at least 23 times smaller, had a better model calibration and clinical utility than the comparison models. A separate smaller PlexusNet model accurately detected slides with breast cancer metastases (AUC: 0.978); it helped reduce the slide number to examine by 43.8\% without consequences, although its parameter capacity was 200 times smaller than ResNet18. We found that the partitioning of the development set influences the model calibration for all models. However, with PlexusNet architecture, we could achieve comparable well-calibrated models trained on different partitions. In conclusion, PlexusNet represents a novel model architecture for histological image analysis that achieves classification performance comparable to other models while providing orders-of-magnitude parameter reduction .
R
histologic imaging
histological image
R
and expensive
or valuable
R
developed and tested PlexusNet for histologic evaluation using a single GPU by a batch dimension of 16x512x512x3
introduced a novel architecture (termed PlexusNet)
R
62 Hematoxylin and eosin stain
310 Hematoxylin and Eosin stained
R
radical prostatectomy
prostate cancer
R
, and 24
and 398
R
whole-slide images with hepatocellular carcinoma from TCGA-LIHC diagnostic histology images. Base models were DenseNet, Inception V3, and MobileNet and compared with PlexusNet. The dice coefficient (DSC) was evaluated for each
whole slides images from the Camelyon 2016 challenge. PlexusNet-architecture -derived models were compared to models derived from several existing "state of the art" architectures. We measured discrimination accuracy, calibration, and clinical utility. An ablation study was conducted to study the effect of each component of PlexusNet on model performance. A well-fitted PlexusNet-based
D
. PlexusNet
D
DSC at patch level: 0.89) for H
R
E whole-slice images
AUC: 0.963)
R
normal tissues. The parameter capacity of PlexusNet is 9 times smallerthan MobileNet or 58 times smaller than Inception V3, respectively. Similar findings were observed in distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma from non-cancerous liver histologies (DSC at patch level: 0.85). As
healthy tissues, although it was at least 23 times smaller, had a better model calibration and clinical utility than the comparison models. A separate smaller PlexusNet model accurately detected slides with breast cancer metastases (AUC: 0.978); it helped reduce the slide number to examine by 43.8\% without consequences, although its parameter capacity was 200 times smaller than ResNet18. We found that the partitioning of the development set influences the model calibration for all models. However, with PlexusNet architecture, we could achieve comparable well-calibrated models trained on different partitions. In
R
the base
other
R
memory savings
parameter reduction