from the very onset "montejurra" devoted attention to social issues like minimum salary, a thread barely characteristic for carlism so far; particular focus was on the rural milieu and some authors advocated even "expropriación forzosa de los latifundios". in isolated but systematically re-appearing articles the review lambasted greedy capitalism yet ridiculed also "aberración del comunismo y socialismo". both marxism and capitalism were denounced as two forms of exploitation of the working people, though when "ya" claimed that "montejurra" was looking for "a third spain", the editors objected. however, indeed also later the monthly seemed equidistant towards capitalist and communist models, publishing articles which denounced both penetration of us capital in spain of the late 1960s and breakdown of steered economy in poland of 1970. its social militancy was getting more and more visible. questions of agrarian reform, discussed mostly by zabala and olcina, earned a dedicated rubric and appeared regularly; these theoretical schemes were increasingly boasting of social justice, the working people, their rights and defense against exploitation. new carlist workers’ organizations, like mot, were dedicated more and more attention. however, until 1971 "montejurra" has never advocated a particular model and did not embrace the term "socialismo"; instead, it opted for "sociedalismo".