the first amendment freedom of speech clause was not violated by the school district because the first amendment protection for student expression described in "tinker v. des moines independent community school district" does not compel a public school to affirmatively sponsor speech that conflicts with its educational goals. the school-funded newspaper at issue was also not considered to be a public forum under the totality of circumstances present in the case, and therefore, its editors were entitled to a lower level of first amendment protection than is applicable to independent student newspapers or those newspapers that have, by policy or practice, opened their pages to student opinion. "the trial court ruled that the school principal's decision to delete the pupil's movie reviews from the school newspaper did not violate his expressional rights under the first amendment of the federal constitution because such action was reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns, as required by the united states supreme court in "hazelwood school district v. kuhlmeier"." nevertheless, the trial court determined that the student's rights had been violated under the state constitution, which, it found, provided broader protection of free expression than the first amendment.