we argued there that erm scale of migration was not necessary to to be contained within leeds and bradford, to promote regeneration because we're s we're now, we have now exhausted all our brown field sites to the extent that we've had to take land out of our greenbelt, but there we were looking at something in the order of four thousand dwellings in three dris districts, spread over fifteen years, and we might reasonably assume that they'd come forward in a dispersed manner on a site by site basis er and be relatively small scale, certainly we would be looking at the local plans which flow from this alteration to make sure that will be the case, now a new settlement's a completely different animal, you would have to come forward quickly otherwise it would not be regarded as a success, it would it would need wide publicity, perhaps across the whole region, maybe even beyond, it would be a a major attraction to anybody thinking of moving house er from leeds to a a location which would be accessible to them to retain their employment in leeds, so i think we were talking about two different things entirely, more than that mr brighton's su suggested that fifteen hundred would not be an adequate scale, it would have to be, i think two thousand five hundred was his figure, er mr timothy's suggested th the same sort of thinking, and mr brook to, that the the settlement would have to get bigger, erm which only compounds our problem, any any settlement which grew larger and larger and inevitably would contain more employment as well as housing would become more of a threat to the regeneration of leeds and, perhaps to a lesser extent bradford, and it's on