a few years before leo's paper, the first small papyrus fragment was found, and the first half of the twentieth century would see the publication of several other pieces which added significantly to the modern text of the "catalogue". among these finds were important passages, the catalogue of suitors and epithalamium of peleus and thetis for example, but few advanced the modern understanding of the work's overall structure. the appearance of the proem in 1956 actually led to a major misapprehension, for the list of gods found therein, beginning with zeus and proceeding through the divine heracles, led some to believe that the "catalogue" was not organized in a strictly genealogical manner, but presented the unions of gods and heroines organized to some extent by amorous deity. six years later, with the publication of the 28th part of the "oxyrhynchus papyri", the corpus of papyrus witnesses to the fragmentary hesiodic poems was nearly doubled, with the lion's share of these new texts belonging to the "catalogue". the new papyri proved once and for all that the poem was organized by genealogies of the great families in a way similar to the "bibliotheca", and that the poet's use of the "ē' hoiē"-formula was not a random method of introduction but an organizing tool within an overall structure.