whether strictly order twenty eight, er order sixty, rule twenty eight for erm applies in this case is not amount entirely clear to me because the obligation to lodge a bill of taxation under rule twenty nine provides that he must begin proceedings for the taxation either within three months after the judgement direction or order of the terminations enter sides are otherwise perfected, and that is presently on it's face which seemed to be debited may of nineteen ninety three and er accordingly that is right, it's not in fact been any  failure to comply with order tw order sixty two, rule twenty nine, one, and that hasn't been disregarded, it's not entirely clear to me that erm  there is any matter come from paragraph sub paragraph a of rule twenty eight, four, it may already require, still nevertheless erm fall within paragraph b of rule fo , erm  there has in fact been a delay in lodging the bill of costs for taxation, the delay being really and truly, the delay in  having the order of mr justice  perfected  and it seems to me that although in chasing matters generally speaking it is the court will itself draw the order, nevertheless where er it seems to be clearly in this case would contemplate it that counsel would sign a minute erm that counsel do sign a minute and that minute has been signed having forwarded by the defendants solicitors to the defendants solicitors seems to me it must be the case that erm the obligation to, as it were, forward that minute to the court, it is an obligation which would lie upon the plaintiffs solicitors and it maybe said that erm there has been delay and erm  on the best it should be lodged with the court sealed, er shortly after it was received and that therefore on that footing there has been delay lodging the bill of costs for concession, er mr, doctor  doesn't seemed to be take any point in relation to that er because it's not in his interest to do so, it seems to be that he does have to say if it has been delayed, with an order of twenty eight rule four  that's a rule, rule, rule twenty eight er four if he is to have interest disbarred and er mr  er he'll apparently have the matter of read before the taxing master, it seems that the taxing master did not chew any sympathy with that er suggestion, that er there was in fact no breach of the requirement rule twenty, four, mr  he said, very probably, that erm, look on text upon it, he really is concerned to erm have this case dealt with as you put it on the merits, it seems to me it's in the interest of all parties that erm i should deal with the case on merits have on the assumption erm that er, that that was lodged properly  i think, i ca i, a matter of which found within rule twenty eight, four and that the  taxing officer give  our interest under that rule.