a few hours later, a letter bearing rhodes's signature arrived, stating that taitz filed the motion without her knowledge or consent, asking land to remove taitz as her attorney of record in the case, and stating that it was her "plan to file a complaint with the california state bar due to [taitz's] reprehensible and unprofessional actions." on september 26, 2009, taitz filed a motion with the court seeking to withdraw as counsel for rhodes, so she could divulge in court "privileged attorney-client communications" since the dismissed "rhodes" case "is now a quasi-criminal prosecution of the undersigned attorney, for the purpose of punishment."