the merging of several traditional characters into one simplified character (e.g., 願 ("yuàn", "desire", commonly used) and 愿 ("yuàn", "honest", archaic and rare) to 愿 (both meanings)) during the simplification process can be thought of as the modern introduction of phonetic loans. this complicates an already complex landscape of "tongjia" characters appearing in classical texts, introducing additional possibilities for misinterpretation, particularly for beginning students. personal names of historical individuals are also problematic. for example, there are two six dynasties period generals whose names are 王濬 (206-286) and 王浚 (252-314), both of which are pronounced as "wáng jùn". however, according to the current prc simplification scheme, the character 濬 is considered to be an obsolete variant of 浚, so to conform to standard orthography, these names should be written identically using 浚. against this argument, proponents of simplified characters respond that simplified characters are more practical in all domains other than ancient literature and that it is uneconomical to introduce high school students, already burdened by schoolwork, to a new character set for the sole purpose of teaching the classical language. any potentially confusing usages can be remedied by providing appropriate annotations and glosses in footnotes, which are needed anyway for student editions of classical texts. when the need arises, history and language majors in colleges and universities gradually learn to read scholarly editions of texts set in traditional characters without too much difficulty. nevertheless, classical texts set in traditional chinese can be hard to find in mainland chinese bookstores. the zhonghua publishing house ("zhonghua shuju", 中華書局) and several other specialist scholastic publishers are the only ones to routinely publish works in traditional characters.