stevens' dissenting opinion essentially stated that, in formulating a ruling for this case, the court had to consider whether the display had any significant relation to the specific and secular history of the state of texas or the united states as a whole. ultimately, stevens asserted that the display "has no purported connection to god's role in the formation of texas or the founding of our nation" and therefore could not be protected on the basis that it was a display dealing with secular ideals. in fact, stevens says that the display transmits the message that texas specifically endorses the judeo-christian values of the display and thus, the display violates the establishment clause.