this criticism of otto and inga is addressed by clark himself in "supersizing the mind":“[the] claim was not that the processes in otto and inga are identical, or even similar, in terms of their detailed implementation. it is simply that, with respect to the role that the long-term encodings play in guiding current response, both modes of storage can be seen as supporting dispositional beliefs. it is the way the information is poised to guide reasoning … and behavior that counts. (p. 96)”he argues that extended cognition was never meant to be a universal "fine-grained similarity" between all minds. he believes that such a "fine-grained similarity" is not necessary when analyzing extended consciousness, suggesting it differs depending on an individual's behavior and their given environment.