alongside monitoring activities during the event, actions were also preemptively taken against several sites that advertised plans to illegally stream the fight. in the philippines, the philippine national police's anti-cybercrime group arrested the operator of a streaming service after a complaint by abs-cbn and was granted a temporary restraining order in a florida court for its infringements of copyrights and trademarks. hbo and showtime filed a similar lawsuit against two other streaming services that advertised an intent to offer the fight under (which allows for preemptive claims of copyright infringement against those conspiring to infringe the copyrights of a broadcast) and a court issued a restraining order against the sites and all parties in "active concert or participation with any of them, including any and all service providers who receive notice of this order". the electronic frontier foundation criticized the wide reach of the order, arguing that the clause of "any and all service providers who receive notice of this order" was comparable to the provisions of the previously proposed stop online piracy act, theorizing that other parties not originally named could become subject to the injunction by merely receiving notice of the order.